<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<itemContainer xmlns="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xsi:schemaLocation="http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5 http://omeka.org/schemas/omeka-xml/v5/omeka-xml-5-0.xsd" uri="https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/items/browse?collection=62&amp;output=omeka-xml&amp;page=7" accessDate="2026-05-04T18:44:20-04:00">
  <miscellaneousContainer>
    <pagination>
      <pageNumber>7</pageNumber>
      <perPage>24</perPage>
      <totalResults>256</totalResults>
    </pagination>
  </miscellaneousContainer>
  <item itemId="54705" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58976">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/ea3cac0518cc3bd50bccb1d15579af5c.pdf</src>
        <authentication>3a12c461c0f27d0ff63954ecc06e3107</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008387">
                    <text>GAYL0RD

SIGN ORDINANCE

ord. amend. eff. March 14, 1993
PHONE:

(517) 732-4060

FAX:

(517) 732-8266

�SIGN ORDINANCE
CITY OF GAYLORD, MICHIGAN
ord. amend. eff. Mar. 14, 1993

20.400

•

An Ordinance to regulate and control the size,
location, number and types of signs within the City
of Gaylord and to provide penalties for the
violation thereof. The purpose of this Ordinance is
to permit signs that will not, by their size,
location, construction or manner of display,
endanger the public safety of any person, will be
consistent with the intent and purposes of the
Gaylord Zoning Ordinance and will enhance the public
interest and general welfare.
THE CITY OF GAYLORD ORDAINS:
20.401

Sec. 1. TITLE.
That this Ordinance shall hereafter be known and
cited as the "Gaylord Sign Ordinance".
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

20.402

Sec. 2. DEFINITIONS.
In interpreting the regulations of this Ordinance
pertaining to signs, the following definitions shall
apply:
1.

ADJACENT AREA.
"Adjacent area" means the area
measured from the nearest edge of the
right-of-way of an interstate, highway, freeway
or primary highway a extending 3,000 feet
perpendicularly and then along a line parallel
to the right-of-way line".

2.

AREA OF SIGN.
"Area of sign" means the entire
area within a circle, triangle, parallelogram or
any other shape which encloses the extreme
limits of writing, representation, emblem, logo
or any other figure or similar character,
together with any frame or other material or
color forming an integral part of the display or
used to differentiate the sign from the
background against which it is placed, excluding
only the structure necessary to support the sign.

Where the sign has two or more faces, the area
of all faces shall be included in computing the
area of the sign, except:
a.

If two (2) such faces are placed
back-to-back, the area of the sign shall be
computed as the area of one face.
20.400 - 20.402
(Rev. 03/93)

�b.

If such faces are of an unequal area, the
larger of the two faces shall determine the
area.

3.

BANNER SIGN.

4.

BILLBOARD.

5.

CANOPY.
"Canopy" means a permanent roof-like
shelter that extends from part or all of a
building face and is constructed of nonrigid
material, except for the supporting framework.

6.

CANOPY SIGN.
"Canopy Sign" means a sign
displayed and affixed flat on or incorporated
into the surface of a canopy and does not extend
vertically or horizontally beyond the limits of
the canopy.

7.

CHANGEABLE COPY SIGN. A sign on which the
copy is changed manually or automatically
through mechanical means.

8.

COPY. The wording, logos or symbols on a sign
surface in either permanent or removable form.

9.

DIRECTIONAL/INFORMATION SIGN. An on-premise
sign giving directions, instructions or facility
information and which may contain the name or
logo of any establishment but no advertising
copy.
(e.g. parking, entrance, exit or signs
which identify specific buildings within a
complex)

10. DISPLAYS.

(See "Temporary Sign").
(See "Off-Premise Sign").

(See "Temporary Sign").

11. EXEMPI' SIGN.

"Exempt sign" means a sign as to
which a permit is not required by this
ordinance.

12. FLASHING SIGN.
"Flashing Sign" is a sign
which contains an intermittent or flashing,
scintillating, blinking or traveling light
source which includes signs that give the
illusion of intermittent or flashing light by
means of animation, or an externally mounted
intermittent light source.
13. FREE STANDING SIGN.

"Free-standing sign"
means a sign erected on a free-standing frame,
mast or pole, and not attached to a building.

20.402

(Rev. 03/93)

�14. HEIGHT OF SIGN.
"Height of sign" means the
vertical distance measured from the point of
ground immediately beneath the sign to the
, highest point of the sign or its projecting
structure.
15. IDENTITY SIGN.
An "identity sign" is a sign
whose copy is limited to the name and address of
building, institution, or person and/or activity
or occupation being identified. Trademarks and
logos customarily associated with a business or
a business' franchise shall be considered an
"identity sign".
16. ILLUMINATED SIGN.
An "illuminated sign" is a
sign that provides artificial light directly on
or through any transparent or translucent
material, from a source of light connected with
such sign, or a sign illuminated by light with a
source so obscured and shielded that no direct
rays from it are visible from a public right of
way or from abutting premises.
17. INCIDENTAL SIGN.
An "incidental sign" is a
sign, emblem or decal for the purpose of
informing the public of goods, facilities or
services available on the premises.
(e.g.
credit card signs or a sign indicating hours of
business.)
18. MAINTENANCE.
For the purpose of this
Ordinance, "Maintenance" shall mean the
cleaning, painting, repair or replacement of
defective parts of a sign in a manner that does
not alter the basic copy, design or structure of
the sign.
19. MARQUEE.

"Marquee" means a permanent
roof-like shelter that extends from part or all
of a building face and is constructed entirely
of noncombustible materials.

20. MARQUEE SIGN.

"Marquee sign" means a sign
displayed on a marquee that does not extend
vertically or horizontally beyond the limits of
the marquee.

21. NAMEPIATE SIGN.

A "nameplate sign" means a
nonelectric identity sign giving only the name,
address and/or occupation of an occupant or
group of occupants residing on a premises.

20. 402

(Rev. 03/93)

�22. NONCONFORMING SIGN.
"Nonconforming sign"
means a sign which lawfully occupied a building
or land at the effective date of this Ordinance,
or any amendment thereto, that does not conform
to the regulations of this ordinance as to the
District in which it is located.
23. OFF-PREMISE SIGN. A sign structure
advertising an establishment, merchandise,
service or entertainment, which is not sold,
produced, manufactured, or furnished at the
premises on which said sign is located.
24. ON-PREMISE SIGN. A sign which pertains to the
use of the premises on which it is located.
25. PERMANENT SIGN. Any sign permanently affixed
to a building or the ground that relates
directly to the use of the building or lot.
26. PERSON. A "person" means any individual,
corporation, association, firm, partnership or
similarly defined interest.
27. POLITICAL SIGN.
28. PORTABLE SIGN.

(See "Temporary Sign").
(See "Temporary Sign").

29. PREMISES.
"Premises" means the contiguous
land in the same ownership or control which is
not divided by a public street.
30. PRIMARY FRONT.
"Primary front" means that
portion of a building which faces the street to
which the building's address is assigned.
31. PROJECTING SIGN.
"Projecting sign" means a
sign other than a wall or marquee sign, which is
perpendicularly attached to, and projects from a
structure or building face.
32. REAL ESTATE SIGN.

(See "Temporary Sign").

33. ROOF LINE.
"Roof line" means the top edge of
the roof or the top of a parapet, whichever
forms the top line of the building silhouette.
34. ROOF SIGN.
"Roof sign" means a sign erected
upon, against or directly above a roof, or on
top of, or above the parapet of a building.

20.402
(Rev. 03/93)

�35. SANDWICH SIGN.

(See "Temporary Sign").

36. SIGN.
"Sign" means a structure, device,
letter, word, model, banner, balloon, pennant,
insignia, emblem, logo, painting, placard,
poster, trade flag or representation,
illuminated or non-illuminated, which is visible
from a public place, including but not limited
to, highways, streets, alleys, or public
property, or is located on private property and
exposed to the public, which directs attention
to a product, service, place, activity, person,
institution, business or solicitation.
37. SUBSTANTIALLY ALTERED.
"Substantially
altered" means a change in a sign or sign
structure, as differentiated from maintenance or
repair including a change in height, location,
area, shape or material, except that which
occurs in manual or automatic changeable copy
signs, including the wording, style or size of
the lettering.
38. TEMPORARY SIGN.
Any sign that is not
permanently affixed, including, but not limited
to banners, portable signs, sandwich signs, real
estate signs, garage sale signs, political
signs, displays and vehicle signs. The
following definitions and regulations govern
"Temporary Signs".

a.

BANNER SIGNS:
Signs which consist of
banners, posters, pennants, ribbons,
streamers or similar devices. These signs
are prohibited, unless specifically
permitted by the City Manager for a period
not to exceed fourteen (14) days.
Placement
of Banner Signs are limited to the B-1, c-1,
and C-2 Districts and require a Temporary
Sign Permit.
Banner Permits will be limited
to a total of six (6), for any one (1)
business within a calendar year. (amend. Mar.
14,

b.

1993)

PORTABLE SIGN: Any
ground or any other
Sandwich Signs), is
said surface and is

sign which rests on the
surface (excluding
not directly attached to
designed to be

20.402

(Rev. 03/93)

�transported from one location to another.
Portable Signs includes, but is not limited,
to the following:
1.
2.

3.

4.
5.

Signs with wheels removed
Signs with chassis or support
constructed without wheels
Designed to be transported by a trailer
or wheels
May have changeable letters and/or
hitches for towing
Mounted on a vehicle for advertising
purposes, parked and visible from the
public right-of-way, excepting signs
identifying the related business when
the vehicle is being used in the normal
day-to-day operations of that business

Portable Signs are prohibited in all
Districts unless specifically permitted by
the city Manager, for promotional purposes,
for a period not to exceed seven (7) days
and are subject to a Temporary Sign Permit.
c.

SANDWICH SIGNS: A free-standing A-Frame
type sign which rests on the ground and is
not directly attached to any surface,
designed to be placed immediately outside of
a business building for the purpose of
identifying a business location and/or
services. Sandwich Signs are subject to the
following:
1.

Total sign face area not to exceed six
(6) square feet per side, with an
overall width not to exceed two (2) feet
and with overall height not to exceed
four (4) feet.

2.

Must be constructed in a professional
manner of wood or metal, with outside
finish of materials made to withstand
ou~side elements without changing
appearance, and sturdy enough to remain
upright in inclement weather.

3.

Must be placed within (3) feet of
business building location.
4.

Sandwich Signs are allowed from May
1st through September 30th, only.

Sandwich Signs are prohibited in all
areas except the Downtown Business
20.402

(Rev. 03/93}

�District and do require a Temporary Sign
Permit.
, d.

e.

REAL ESTATE SIGNS: A temporary sign
advertising the real estate upon which the
sign is located as being for sale, rent or
lease. Real Estate Signs are subject to the
following:
1.

On improved land, one (1) Real Estate
Sign allowed per premises, not exceeding
six (6) square feet in area, provided
that no such sign is placed within the
public right-of-way or on any utility
pole. A Temporary Sign Permit is not
required.

2.

In cases of unimproved or vacant land of
ten (10) acres or more, one (1) Real
Estate Sign, not exceeding thirty two
(32) square feet with a maximum height
of six (6) feet will be permitted for a
period not to exceed two (2) years. A
Temporary Sign Permit is required.

3.

All such signs shall be removed within
seven (7) days after the sale or lease
has been consummated. Real Estate Signs
are allowed in all Districts.

GARAGE SALE SIGNS: A temporary sign or
poster used for the primary purpose of
directing attention to an individual or
group sale of used goods and products at a
private dwelling in a residential area for a
limited period of time. Garage Sale Signs
are subject to the following:
1.

Garage Sale Signs may not exceed six (6)
square feet in area and may be posted
for no more than seven (7) consecutive
days.

2.

Garage Sale Signs shall be posted on
private property only with the
permission of the property owner.

3.

No Garage Sale Signs may be posted on
any utility pole or within any public
right of way.

Garage Sale Signs are allowed in R-1 and R-2
Districts and on residential properties
located in a C-1 and C-2 District only.
20.402

(Rev. 03/93)

�Garage Sale Signs are not subject to a
Temporary Sign Permit.
f.

POLITICAL SIGNS: A temporary sign designed
to advocate or oppose a candidate for
political office or an issue to be
determined at an official Federal, State,
County, School or Municipal election.
Political Signs are subject to the following:
1.

A maximum of one (1) political sign for
each candidate or proposal per premises
in an R-1 or R-2 District. Each sign is
restricted to six (6) square feet in
area. (amend. Mar. 14, 1993)

2.

A maximum of one (1) political sign for
each candidate or proposal per premises
in the B-1, C-1 or C-2 District. Each
sign is restricted to sixteen (16)
square feet in area, with a maximum
height of six feet. (amend. Mar. 14,
1993)

3.

Political Signs shall not be installed
more than forty five (45) days before
the candidate or issue appears upon the
ballot and shall be removed within ten
(10) days after the election to which
they pertain.

4.

Political Signs may be located in the
required front yard in any District with
permission of the property owner, but
shall not be located in any public right
of way.

Political Signs are not subject to a
Temporary Sign Permit.
g.

DISPLAYS: Outdoor exhibit of merchandise
arranged in a manner so as to advertise or
promote products or services offered on said
premises. Displays are subject to the
following:
1.

Must be placed within (3) feet of
business building location.

20.402

(Rev. 03/93)

�h.

2.

Displays are prohibited in all Districts
except the Downtown Business District
and C-2 District. Displays in the
Downtown Business District are permitted
from May 1st through September 30th,
only.

3.

Displays do not require a Temporary Sign
Permit, but are subject to review by the
City Manager at any given time. Those
businesses found to be in violation of
the intent of this Ordinance will be
notified in writing by the City Manager
and subject to the termination of the
use of outdoor displays.

VEHICLE SIGNS: Signs which are mounted or
painted on vehicles, which are primarily
situated or used to serve as a sign rather
than transportation. Vehicle Signs are
subject to the following:
1.

Vehicle Signs are prohibited in all
Districts unless specifically permitted
by the City Manager, for promotional
purposes, for a period not to exceed
seven (7) days and are subject to a
Temporary Sign Permit.

39. UNDER-CANOPY SIGN. An "under-canopy sign" is
a sign which is suspended beneath a canopy,
ceiling, roof or marquee.
40. WALL SIGN.
"Wall sign" means a sign which is
painted or attached directly to the exterior
wall of a building and which does not project
more than eighteen (18) inches from the wall,
with the face of the sign running on a parallel
plane to the plane of the building wall.
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)
20.403

Sec. 3. REQUIREMENTS AND PROHIBITIONS.
A person shall not erect or maintain a sign within
the City of Gaylord unless the sign is in full
compliance with this Ordinance and without first
obtaining a permit for such sign as required by this
Ordinance.
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

20.403
(Rev. 03/93)

�20.404

Sec. 4. SIGNS EXISTING ON THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF
THIS ORDINANCE.
All signs which are not in compliance with the
provisions of this Ordinance on its effective date
may be continued subject to the provisions of
Section 12 (20.412).
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

20.405

20.406

Sec. 5. INCORPORATION OF ZONING ORDINANCES AND
MAPS: REQUIRED INFORMATION.
1.

All duly enacted zoning ordinances and any
amendments or additions thereto, that are in
force and effect within the City of Gaylord,
either now or in the future, and all zoning maps
defining or delineating the various zoning
districts within the City of Gaylord, are hereby
incorporated by reference into this, the Gaylord
Sign Ordinance.

2.

Before applying for any permit required by this
ordinance, a person intending to apply for a
permit for a sign shall first determine the
manner in which the premises upon which the sign
is to be located is zoned, and shall furnish
-such information when applying for any sign
permit.
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

Sec. 6. PERMITTED SIGNS IN R-1 (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE) DISTRICTS.
Signs shall be permitted in R-1 Residential
Districts only as follows:
1.

One (1) non-illuminated nameplate sign per
premises, not exceeding one (1) square foot in
area, for the purpose of identifying the name of
the owner or occupants residing on said
premise. A Sign Permit is not required.

2.

One (1) non-illuminated professional nameplate
sign per premises, not exceeding one (1) square
foot in area, for the purpose of identifying a
classified Home Occupation, Residential State
Licensed Facility or Day Care Center. A sign
permit is not required.

3.

Signs erected by an official government body or
agency and deemed necessary for the protection
of the public health, safety, or welfare; or
those signs required by law to be displayed.

20.404 - 20.406

(Rev. 03/93)

�4.

One (1) non-illuminated temporary residential
Real Estate Sign, Garage Sale Sign or Political
Sign per premises, not to exceed six (6) square
• feet in area, provided that said sign conforms
to placement and time limitation regulations set
forth in Section 2 (20.402) DEFINITIONS, Signs,
Temporary. In areas of undeveloped land of ten
(10) acres or more, one (1) Real Estate Sign,
not to exceed thirty two (32) square feet with a
maximum height of six (6) feet will be permitted
for a period not to exceed two (2) years.

5.

one (1) non-illuminated free-standing identity
sign, not to exceed six (6) square feet in area,
with a maximum height of six (6) feet for the
purpose of identifying parks, playgrounds or
community buildings owned or operated by public
agencies.

6.

One (1) non-illuminated free-standing identity
sign, not to exceed twelve (12) square feet in
area, with a maximum height of six (6) feet, or
one (1) non-illuminated wall sign, not exceeding
six (6) square feet in area for the purpose of
identifying the church, pastor and church
activities located on the premises.

7.

One (1) non-illuminated free-standing identity
sign, not to exceed twelve (12) square feet in
area, with a maximum height of six (6) feet, or
one (1) non-illuminated wall sign, not exceeding
six (6) square feet in area for the purpose of
identifying public schools or those private or
parochial schools having a curriculum similar to
a public elementary, public high school or
nursery school.
In addition to the allowed
identity sign, the following informational signs
are allowed:
a.

Informational wall signs, not to exceed
three (3) square feet in area per sign, for
the purpose of identifying building
entrances or specific buildings such as
gymnasium, administration, vocational

20.406
(Rev. 03/93)

�education building, cafeteria, etc., with an
aggregate informational sign area not to
exceed thirty (30) square feet per building.
b.

Free-standing informational signs, not to
exceed three (3) square feet in area, with a
maximum height of four (4) feet for the
purpose of identifying parking lot entrances
and/or exits.

c.

Scoreboards on athletic fields.

8.

None of the free-standing signs permitted in an
R-1 District, with the exception of Temporary
Signs, shall be erected nearer any street than
one-half (1/2) the setback required for the
principal building to be erected on said
premises.

9.

No Off-Premise signs will be allowed in an R-1
District.

10. Signs identifying or advertising any use or

activity defined as a ''Special Use" or that are
subject to a Special Use Permit as outlined in
Section 13 of the Zoning Ordinance, shall be
approved by City Council at the time the Special
Use Permit is granted.
11. The effect of wind pressure shall be thoroughly
considered in the design of all signs, but in no
case shall the wind load be assumed less than
thirty (30) pounds per square foot.

12. No person shall alter, enlarge, or erect a sign
unless it is in accordance with these provisions.
13. All signs shall be maintained in good repair in
terms of structure and appearance. Any sign,
which is applicable to a business which has been
permanently discontinued, shall be eliminated by
the property owner within thirty (30) days after
said discontinuance.

14. No person shall erect, place, structurally
alter, or add to any sign without obtaining a
permit from the Building Official designated
under the terms of the Gaylord Zoning Ordinance.
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

20.406

(Rev. 03/93)

�20.406a

Sec. 6a. PERMITTED SIGNS IN R-2 (MULTIPLE FAMILY
RESIDENCE) DISTRICTS.
Signs shall be permitted in R-2 Residential
Districts only as follows:
1.

One (1) non-illuminated nameplate sign per
premises, not exceeding one (1) square foot in
area, for the purpose of identifying the name of
the owner or occupants presiding on said
residence. A sign permit is not required.

2.

One (1) non-illuminated professional nameplate
sign per premises, not exceeding two (2) square
feet in area for the purpose of identifying the
premises or services rendered on the premises,
including the following:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.

Home Occupations
Day Care Centers
Lodging Houses, Boarding Houses or Bed and
Breakfast
Private Clubs, Fraternities, Sororities or
Lodges
Physician, Surgeon or Dentist Office located
within a dwelling
Apartments Buildings with a minimum of four
(4) units
Any other use allowed in an R-2 District

A Sign Permit is required.
3.

Signs erected by an official government body or
agency and deemed necessary for the protection
of the public health, safety, or welfare; or
those signs required by law to be displayed.

4. ·

One (1) non-illuminated temporary residential
Real Estate Sign, Garage Sale Sign or Political
Sign per premises, not to exceed six (6) square
feet in area, provided that said sign conforms
to placement and time limitation regulations set
forth in Section 2 (20.402) DEFINITIONS,
Temporary· Signs. In areas of undeveloped land
of ten (10) acres or more, one (1) Real Estate
Sign, not to exceed thirty two (32) square feet
with a maximum height of six (6) feet will be
permitted for a period not to exceed two (2)
years. A Sign Permit is not required.

5.

One (1) non-illuminated free-standing sign, not
to exceed six (6) square feet in area, with a
maximum height of six (6) feet for the purpose

20.406a
(Rev. 03/93)

�of identifying parks, playgrounds or community
buildings owned or operated by public agencies.
6.

One (1) non-illuminated free-standing identity
sign, not to exceed twelve (12) square feet in
area, with a maximum height of six (6) feet, or
one (1) non-illuminated wall sign, not exceeding
six (6) square feet in area, for the purpose of
identifying the church, pastor and church
activities located on the premises.

7.

One (1) free-standing identity sign, not to
exceed twelve (12) square feet in area, with a
maximum height of six (6) feet, or one (1) wall
sign, not exceeding six (6) square feet in area,
for the purpose of identifying hospitals,
nursing or convalescent homes, mortuaries and
institutions. In addition to the allowed
identity sign, the following informational signs
are allowed:

8.

a.

Informational wall signs, not to exceed
three (3) square feet in area per sign, for
the purpose of identifying building
entrances or specific buildings, with an
aggregate informational sign area not to
exceed thirty (30) square feet.

b.

Free-standing informational signs, not to
exceed three (3) square feet in area, with a
maximum height of four (4) feet, for the
purpose of identifying parking lot entrances
and/or exits.

One (1) non-illuminated free-standing identity
sign, not to exceed six (6) square feet in area,
with a maximum height of six (6) feet, or one
(1) wall sign, not exceeding six .(6) square feet
in area, for the purpose of identifying
apartment complexes with a total of five (5) or
more units.
In addition to the allowed
identity sign, the following informational signs
are allowed:
a.

Informational wall signs, not to exceed two
(2) square feet in area per sign, for the
purpose of identifying building entrances or
specific buildings, with an aggregate sign
area not to exceed twelve (12) square feet.

b.

Free-standing informational signs, not to
exceed three (3) square feet in area, with a
maximum height of four (4) feet for the

20.406a

(Rev. 03/93)

�purpose of identifying parking lot entrances
and/or exits.
9. , One (1) non-illuminated free-standing identity
sign, not to exceed twelve (12) square feet in
area, with a maximum height of six (6) feet, or
one (1) non-illuminated wall sign, not exceeding
six (6) square feet in area, for the purpose of
identifying public schools or those private or
parochial schools having a curriculum similar to
a public elementary, public high school or
nursery school.
In addition to the allowed
identity sign, the following informational signs
are allowed:
a.

Informational wall signs, not to exceed
three (3) square feet in area per sign, for
the purpose of identifying building
entrances or specific buildings such as
gymnasium, administration, vocational
education building, cafeteria, etc., with an
aggregate sign area not to exceed thirty
(30) square feet per building.

b.

Free-standing informational signs, not to
exceed three (3) square feet in area, with a
maximum height of four (4) feet, for the
purpose of identifying parking lot entrances
and/or exits.

c.

Scoreboards on athletic fields.

10. One (1) non-illuminated free-standing identity
sign, not to exceed six (6) square feet in area,
with a maximum height of six (6) feet, or one
(1) non-illuminated wall sign, not exceeding six
(6) square feet in area, for the purpose of
identifying a State residential licensed .
facility, located on the premises and whose
staff includes a minimum of four (4) employees
which do not reside on said premises.
11. None of the free-standing signs permitted in an
R-2 District, with the exception of Temporary
Signs, shall be erected nearer any street than
one-half (1/2) the setback required for the
principal building to be erected on said
premises.

12. Illumination, if used, shall be what is known as
white and shall not be blinking, fluctuating or
moving. Light rays shall shine only upon the
premises and shall not encroach upon any other
property line except by indirect reflection.
20.406a

(Rev. 03/93)

�13. No Off-Premise signs will be allowed in an R-2
District.
14. Signs identifying or advertising any use or
activity defined as a "Special Use'' or that are
subject to a Special Use Permit as outlined in
Section 13 of the Zoning Ordinance, shall be
approved by City Council at the time the Special
Use Permit is granted.
15. The effect of wind pressure sh~ll be thoroughly
considered in the design of all signs, but in no
case shall the wind load be assumed less than
thirty (30) pounds per square foot.
16. No person shall alter, enlarge, or erect a sign
unless it is in accordance with these provisions.
17. All signs shall be maintained in good repair in
terms of structure and appearance. Any sign,
which is applicable to a business which has been
permanently discontinued, shall be eliminated by
the property owner within thirty (30) days after
said discontinuance.
18. No person shall erect, place, structurally
alter, or add to any sign without obtaining a
permit from the Building Official designated
under the terms of the Gaylord Zoning Ordinance.
(ord. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)
20.407

Sec. 7. PERMI'ITED SIGNS IN THE B-1, CENTRAL
BUSINESS DISTRICT.
For the purpose of this Ordinance the B-1, Central
Business District shall be identified as those
properties which are north of Second Street, south
of Mitchell Street, east of Michigan Avenue and west
of Elm Street.
Signs when erected or used on the building or
exterior wall or otherwise used as permitted under
the provisions of this ordinance, shall comply with
the following requirements:
1.

The aggregate sign area allowed for a business
shall be based on one and one-half (1 1/2)
square feet per lineal foot of the primary front
of the business portion of the building.

2.

Only wall signs, canopy signs, under-canopy
signs or projecting signs for the purpose of
identifying the name of the person, business
and/or services offered on the premises, may be
20.407

(Rev. 03/93)

�utilized across the primary front of the
building.
3. , Projecting signs are restricted to twelve (12)
square feet for those businesses whose primary
front of the business portion of the building is
less than sixty (60) lineal feet.
Projecting
signs are restricted to twenty-four (24) square
feet for those businesses whose primary front of
the business portion of the building is sixty
(60) or more lineal feet.
Projecting signs over
twelve (12) square feet in area must be erected
a minimum of fifteen (15) feet from any
adjoining or adjacent business. The bottom of
any projecting sign must be a minimum of ten
(10) feet from the ground or sidewalk level.
Under canopy signs are restricted to a total of
three hundred eight-four (384) square inches
with a maximum height of eight (8) inches. The
bottom of an under canopy sign shall be a
minimum of seven (7) feet from the ground or
sidewalk level. (amend. Mar. 14, 1993)
4.

Additional wall signs, canopy signs and/or
projecting signs on other than the primary front
of the business building are permitted as long
as the aggregate square footage of all signs
does not exceed the maximum square footage
allowed under paragraph 1.

5.

Marquee Signs are permitted for Cinemas located
in the B-1, Central Business District, in
addition to the allowed wall mounted signs and
in addition to the square footage limitations
under paragraph 1 above. Marquee Signs shall
not exceed a total of two (2) per premises with
a maximum size of fifty six (56) square feet and
maximum height of four (4) feet each.

6.

No sign shall be allowed to obstruct or
interfere with motor vehicle or pedestrian
traffic, or be hazardous to the public.

7.

Illumination, if used, shall be what is known as
white and signs shall not be of flashing or
intermittent illumination. The direct source of
all lights used for the illumination of
commercial establishments or for the
illumination display of merchandise or the
products of such establishment shall be
completely shielded from the view of vehicular
traffic using the roads or streets abutting such
premises. Floodlights used for the illumination
of commercial premises or any sign thereon,
20.407
(Rev. 03/93)

�whether such floodlights are attached to or
separate from the building, shall not project
above the highest elevation of the front wall of
such building, or thirty (30) feet above street
level, whichever is less.
8.

When more than one (1) business occupies a
building, each business shall be allowed signage
based on the portion of the building occupied by
such business.

9.

Temporary Signs permitted in the B-1 Central
Business District must conform to placement and
time limitations regulations as set forth in
Section 2, (20.402) DEFINITIONS, Temporary Signs.

10. Roof mounted signs are prohibited in the B-1
central Business District.
11. Off premise signs are prohibited in the B-1
Central Business District.
12. In those instances in which a business building
is located not closer than a distance of twenty
(20) feet to the property line, one (1)
free-standing sign is permitted when located in
such a manner that no part extends closer than
five (5) feet to the front or side property
lines. The total sign and supporting structure
may have a maximum height of eighteen (18) feet
above ground level and may have an area not to
exceed thirty-two (32) square feet on any one
(1) face of sign.
13. The effect of wind pressure shall be thoroughly
considered in the design of all signs, but in no
case shall the wind load be assumed less than
thirty (30) pounds per square foot.
14. No person shall alter, enlarge, or erect a sign
unless it is in accordance with these provisions.
15. All signs shall be maintained in good repair in
terms of structure and appearance. Any sign,
which is applicable to a business which has been
permanently discontinued, shall be eliminated by
the property owner within thirty (30) days after
said discontinuance.
16. No person shall erect, place, structurally
alter, or add to any sign without obtaining a
permit from the Building Official designated
under the terms of the Gaylord Zoning Ordinance.

20.407
(Rev. 03/93)

�17. Signs erected by an official government body or
agency and deemed necessary for the protection
of the public health, safety, or welfare; or
, those signs required by law to be displayed are
permitted.
18. Signs identifying or advertising any use or
activity defined as a "Special Use" or that are
subject to a Special Use Permit as outlined in
Section 13 of the Zoning Ordinance, shall be
approved by City Council at the time the Special
Use Permit is granted.
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)
20.407a

Sec. 7a. PERMITI'ED SIGNS IN C-1 (GENERAL
COMMERCIAL) DISTRICT.
Signs when erected or used on the building or
exterior wall or otherwise used as permitted under
the provisions of this ordinance, shall comply with
the following requirements:
1.

Signs allowed for the following shall be limited
to those restrictions set forth in Section 7
20.406a), R-2 (Multiple Family Residence)
District:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
i.
j.
k.

2.

Home Occupations
Day Care Centers located within a dwelling
Lodging Houses, Boarding Houses or Bed and
Breakfast
Private Clubs, Fraternities, Sororities or
Lodges
Physician, Surgeon or Dentist Office located
within a dwelling
Apartment Buildings (as based on the number
of units)
Churches
Hospitals
Schools
Nameplate for the purpose of identifying the
name of the owner or occupants residing on
the premises
State residential licensed facility

The aggregate sign area allowed for all other
businesses located in a C-1 District shall be
based on two (2) square feet per lineal foot of
the primary front of the business portion of the
building. Businesses may utilize canopy signs,
free-standing signs, marquee signs, projecting
signs, under-canopy signs and wall signs as long
as the aggregate square footage of all signs do

20.407a
(Rev. 03/93)

�not exceed the square footage allowed based on
the primary front of a building.
3.

All signs, with the exception of free-standing
signs, projecting signs and under-canopy signs,
are limited to a maximum height of (6) feet, as
defined in Section 2 (20.402) DEFINITIONS.

4.

Projecting signs are restricted to twelve (12)
square feet for those businesses whose primary
front of the business portion of the building is
less than sixty (60) lineal feet.
Projecting
signs are restricted to twenty-four (24) square
feet for those businesses whose primary front of
the business portion of the building is sixty
(60) or more lineal feet.
Projecting signs over
twelve (12) square feet in area must be erected
a minimum of fifteen (15) feet from any
adjoining or adjacent business. The bottom of
any projecting sign must be a minimum of ten
(10) feet from the ground or sidewalk level.
Under canopy signs are restricted to a total of
three hundred eight-four (384) square inches
with a maximum height of eight (8) inches. The
bottom of an under canopy sign shall be a
minimum of seven (7) feet from the ground or
sidewalk level. (amend. Mar. 14, 1993)

5.

Marquee Signs are permitted for Cinemas located
in a C-1 District, in addition to the allowed
other signage and in addition to the square
footage limitations under paragraph 2 above.
Marquee Signs shall not exceed a total of two
(2) per premises with a maximum size of fifty
six (56) square feet and maximum height of four
(4) feet each.

6.

Where a business building is located not closer
than a distance of twenty (20) feet to the front
property line, one (1) free-standing sign is
permitted when located in such a manner that no
part extends closer than five (5) feet to the
front or side property lines. The total sign
and supporting structure may have a maximum
height of eighteen (18) feet above the average
ground level and may have an area not to exceed
eighty (80) square feet on any one (1) face of
sign, provided the aggregate sign area is within
the limitations of paragraph 1 above.

7.

Free-standing informational signs, not exceeding
three (3) square feet in area, with a maximum
height of four (4) feet for the purpose of

20.407a
(Rev. 03/93)

�identifying parking lot entrances and/or exits
are permitted.
8. , No sign shall be allowed to obstruct or
interfere with motor vehicle or pedestrian
traffic, or be hazardous to the public.
9.

Illumination, if used, shall be what is known as
white and signs shall not be of flashing or
intermittent illumination. The direct source of
all lights used for the illumination of
commercial establishments or for the
illumination display of merchandise or the
products of such establishment shall be
completely shielded from the view of vehicular
traffic using the roads or streets abutting such
premises. Floodlights used for the illumination
of commercial premises or any sign thereon,
whether such floodlights are attached to or
separate from the building, shall not project
above the highest elevation of the front wall of
such building, or thirty (30) feet above street
level, whichever is less.

10. When more than one (1) business occupies a
building, each business shall be allowed signage
based on the portion of the building occupied by
such business.
11. Temporary Signs in a C-1 District must conform
to placement and time limitations regulations as
set forth in Section 2, (20.402) DEFINITIONS,
Temporary Signs.
12. Roof mounted signs are prohibited in a C-1
District.
13. Off-premise signs are prohibited in a C-1
District.
14. The effect of wind pressure shall be thoroughly
considered in the design, but in no case shall
the wind load be assumed less than thirty (30)
pounds per square foot.
15. No person shall alter, enlarge, or erect a sign
unless it is in accordance with these provisions.
16. All signs shall be maintained in good repair in
terms of structure and appearance. Any sign,
which is applicable to a business which has been
permanently discontinued, shall be eliminated by
the property owner within thirty (30) days after
said discontinuance.
20.407a
(Rev. 03/93)

�17. No person shall erect, place, structurally
alter, or add to any sign without obtaining a
permit from the Building Official designated
under the terms of the Gaylord Zoning Ordinance.
18. Signs erected by an official government body or
agency and deemed necessary for the protection
of the public health, safety, or welfare; or
those signs required by law to be displayed are
permitted.
19. Signs identifying or advertising any use or
activity defined as a "Special Use" or that are
subject to a Special Use Permit as outlined in
Section 13 of the Zoning Ordinance, shall be
approved by City Council at the time the Special
Use Permit is granted.
(ord. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)
20.407b

Sec. 7b. PERMITTED SIGNS IN C-2 (CENTRAL
COMMERCIAL} DISTRICT.
Signs when erected or used on the building or
exterior wall or otherwise used as permitted under
the provisions of this ordinance, shall comply with
the following requirements:
1.

Signs allowed for the following shall be limited
to those restrictions set forth in Section 7
20.406a), R-2 (Multiple Family Residence)
District:
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.

2.

Home Occupations
Day Care Centers located within a dwelling
Apartment Buildings (as based on the number
of units)
Churches
Hospitals
Schools
Nameplate for the purpose of identifying the
name of the owner or occupants residing on
the premises

One non-illuminated free-standing sign, not to
exceed twelve (12) square feet in area with a
maximum height of six (6) feet, or one (1)
non-illuminated wall sign not exceeding six (6)
square feet in area will be permitted for the
following located in a C-2 District:
a.
b.

Lodging Houses, Boarding Houses or Bed and
Breakfast
Private Clubs, Fraternitiei, Sororities or
Lodges
20.407b
(Rev. 03/93)

�c.
d.

Physician, Surgeon or Dentist Office located
within a dwelling
State residential licensed care facility

3.

The aggregate sign area allowed for all other
businesses located in a C-2 District shall be
based on two (2) square feet per lineal foot of
the primary front of the business portion of the
building. Businesses may utilize canopy signs,
free-standing signs, marquee signs, projecting
signs, under-canopy signs and wall signs as long
as the aggregate square footage of all signs
does not exceed the square footage allowed based
on the primary front of a building.

4.

All signs, with the exception of free-standing
signs, projecting signs and under-canopy signs,
are limited to a maximum height of (6) feet, as
defined in Section 2 (20.402) DEFINITIONS.

5.

Projecting signs are restricted to twelve (12)
square feet for those businesses whose primary
front of the business portion of the building is
less than sixty (60) lineal feet.
Projecting
signs are restricted to twenty-four (24) square
feet for those businesses whose primary front of
the business portion of the building is sixty
(60) or more lineal feet.
Projecting signs over
twelve (12) square feet in area must be erected
a minimum of fifteen (15) feet from any
adjoining or adjacent business. The bottom of
any projecting sign must be a minimum of ten
(10) feet from the ground or sidewalk level.
Under canopy signs are restricted to a total of
three hundred eight-four (384) square inches
with a maximum height of eight (8) inches. The
bottom of an under canopy sign shall be a
minimum of seven (7) feet from the ground or
sidewalk level. (amend. Mar. 14, 1993)

6.

Marquee Signs are permitted for Cinemas located
in a C-2 District, in addition to the allowed
other signage and in addition to the square
footage limitations under paragraph 3 above.
Marquee Signs shall not exceed a total of two
(2) per premises with a maximum size of fifty
six (56) square feet and maximum height of four
(4) feet each.

7.

Free-standing signs are
District providing they
the aggregate sign area
3 above and are subject

allowed in a C-2
are not in violation of
limitations of paragraph
to the following:

20.407b
(Rev. 03/93)

�a.

In those instances in which a business
building is located not closer than a
distance of twenty (20) feet to the property
line, one (1) free-standing sign is
permitted when located in such a manner that
no part extends closer than five (5) feet to
the front or side property lines. The total
sign and supporting structure may have a
maximum height of eighteen (18) feet above
the average ground level and may have an
area not to exceed eighty (80) square feet
on any one (1) face of sign.

b.

Those businesses whose premises are located
within a one thousand (1,000) foot radius of
any expressway exit may have one (1)
free-standing sign whose location, height
and size are not restricted except that the
aggregate sign area limitations of paragraph
3, above, shall apply and include the area
of any free-standing sign.
In computing the
square footage of a free-standing sign in
this instance, only one (1) face of the sign
shall be counted. Those businesses applying
for a sign permit under this subsection must
present to the City Clerk a certified survey
detailing the premises in relation to an
expressway exit.

c.

Shopping Center or business complexes
located on premises with a minimum of three
hundred (300) feet of frontage from - the
building(s) to the property line, may have
two (2) free-standing signs, to be located
not less than one hundred seventy-five (175)
feet apart and are subject to size
restrictions as outlined in 7a and 7b
above.

8.

Free-standing informational signs, not exceeding
three (3) square feet in area, with a maximum
height of four (4) feet, for the purpose of
identifying parking lot entrances and/or exits
are permitted.

9.

No sign shall be allowed to obstruct or
interfere with motor vehicle or pedestrian
traffic, or be hazardous to the public.

10. Illumination, if used, shall be what is known as
white and signs shall not be of flashing or
intermittent illumination. The direct source of
all lights used for the illumination of
commercial establishments or for the
20.407b
(Rev. 03/93)

�illumination display of merchandise or the
products of such establishment shall be
completely shielded from the view of vehicular
, traffic using the roads or streets abutting such
premises. Floodlights used for the illumination
of commercial premises or any sign thereon,
whether such floodlights are attached to or
separate from the building, shall not project
above the highest elevation of the front wall of
such building, or thirty (30) feet above street
level.
11. When more than one (1) business occupies a
building, each business shall be allowed signage
based on the portion of the building occupied by
such business.
12. Temporary Signs in a C-2 District must conform
to placement and time limitations regulations as
set forth in Section 2, (20.402) DEFINITIONS,
Temporary Signs.
13. Roof mounted signs are prohibited in a C-2
District.
14. Off-premise signs are prohibited in a C-2
District.
15. The effect of wind pressure shall be thoroughly
considered in the design, but in no case shall
the wind load be assumed less than thirty (30)
pounds per square foot.
16. No person shall alter, enlarge, or erect a sign
unless it is in accordance with these provisions.
17. All signs shall be maintained in good repair in
terms of structure and appearance. Any sign,
which is applicable to a business which has been
permanently discontinued, shall be eliminated by
the property owner within thirty (30) days after
said discontinuance.
18. No person shall erect, place, structurally
alter, or add to any sign without obtaining a
permit from the Building Official designated
under the terms of the Gaylord Zoning Ordinance.
19. Signs erected by an official government body or
agency and deemed necessary for the protection
of the public health, safety, or welfare; or
those signs required by law to be displayed are
permitted.

20.407b .
(Rev. 03/93)

�20. Signs identifying or advertising any use or
activity defined as a "Special Use" or that are
subject to a Special Use Permit as outlined in
Section 13 of the Zoning Ordinance, shall be
approved by City Council at the time the Special
Use Permit is granted.
(ord. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)
20.407c

Sec. 7c. PERMITTED SIGNS IN M-1 (MANUFACTURING)
DISTRICT.
Signs when erected or used on the building or
exterior wall or otherwise used as permitted under
the provisions of this ordinance, shall comply with
the following requirements:
1.

Signs allowed for the following shall be limited
to those restrictions set forth in Section 7
20.406a), R-2 (Multiple Family Residence)
District:
a.
b.
c.

2.

One non-illuminated free-standing sign, not to
exceed twelve (12) square feet in area with a
maximum height of six (6) feet, or one (1)
non-illuminated wall sign not exceeding six (6)
square feet in area will be permitted for the
following located in a M-1 District:
a.

3.

Churches
Hospitals
Schools

Private Clubs, Fraternities, Sororities or
Lodges

The aggregate sign area allowed for all other
businesses located in a M-1 District shall be
based on two (2) square feet per lineal foot of
the primary front of the business portion of the
building and may utilize canopy signs,
free-standing signs, marquee signs, projecting
signs, under-canopy signs and wall signs as long
as the aggregate square footage of all signs
does not exceed the square footage allowed based
on the primary front of a building.

20.407c
(Rev. 03/93)

�4.

All signs, with the exception of free-standing
signs, projecting signs and under-canopy signs,
, are limited to a maximum height of (6) feet, as
defined in Section 2 (20.402) DEFINITIONS.

5.

Projecting signs on a building are restricted to
eight hundred sixty four (864) square inches,
with a maximum height of thirty (30) inches.
Under-canopy signs may not exceed a height of
eight (8) inches or a maximum length of four (4)
feet.
The bottom of a under-canopy sign shall
be a minimum of seven (7) feet from the ground
or sidewalk level.

6.

Marquee Signs are permitted for Cinemas located
in a M-1 District, in addition to the allowed
other signage and in addition to the square
footage limitations under paragraph 3 above.
Marquee Signs shall not exceed a total of two
(2) per premises with a maximum size of fifty
six (56) square feet and maximum height of four
(4) feet each.

7.

Free-standing signs are
District providing they
the aggregate sign area
3 above and are subject

allowed in a M-1
are not in violation of
limitations of paragraph
to the following:

a.

In those instances in which a business
building is located not closer than a
distance of twenty (20) feet to the front
property line, one (1) free-standing sign is
permitted when located in such a manner that
no part extends closer than five (5) feet to
the front or side property lines. The total
sign and supporting structure may have a
maximum height of eighteen (18) feet above
the average ground level and may have an
area not to exceed eighty (80) square feet
on any one (1) face of sign.

b.

Those businesses whose premises are located
within a one thousand (1,000) foot radius of
any expressway exit may have one (1)
free-standing sign whose size shall not be
restricted by this Ordinance. Those
businesses must submit to the City Clerk a
certified survey detailing the premises in
relation to the expressway exit when
applying for a Sign Permit.

c.

Shopping Center, business or industrial
complexes located on premises with a minimum
20.407c
(Rev. 03/93)

�of three hundred (300) feet of frontage from
the building to the property line, may have
two (2) free-standing signs, not to be
located less than one hundred seventy-five
(175) feet apart and are subject to size
restrictions as outlined in 7a and 7b
above.
8.

Free-standing informational signs, exceeding
three (3) square feet in area, with a maximum
height of four (4) feet for the purpose of
identifying parking lot entrances and/or exits
are permitted.

9.

No sign shall be allowed to obstruct or
interfere with motor vehicle or pedestrian
traffic, or be hazardous to the public.

10. Illumination, if used, shall be what is known as
white and signs shall not be of flashing or
intermittent illumination. The direct source of
all lights used for the illumination of
commercial establishments or for the
illumination display of merchandise or the
products of such establishment shall be
completely shielded from the view of vehicular
traffic using the roads or streets abutting such
premises.
Floodlights used for the illumination
of commercial premises or any sign thereon,
whether such floodlights are attached to or
separate from the building, shall not project
above the highest elevation of the front wall of
such building, or thirty (30) feet above street
level.
11. When more than one (1) business occupies a
building, each business shall be allowed signage
based on the portion of the building occupied by
such business.
12. Temporary Signs in a M-1 District must conform
to placement and time limitations regulations as
set forth in Section 2, (20.402) DEFINITIONS,
Temporary Signs.
13. Roof mounted signs are prohibited in a M-1
District.
·
14. Off-premise signs are allowed in an M-1 District
in accordance with the provisions outlined in
Section 8 (20.408), OFF-PREMISES SIGNS.
15. The effect of wind pressure shall be thoroughly
considered in the design, but in no case shall
20.407c
(Rev. 03/93)

�the wind load be assumed less than thirty (30)
pounds per square foot.
16.• No person shall alter, enlarge, or erect a sign
unless it is in accordance with these provisions.

17. All signs shall be maintained in good repair in
terms of structure and appearance. Any sign,
which is applicable to a business which has been
permanently discontinued, shall be eliminated by
the property owner within thirty (30) days after
said discontinuance.
18. No person shall erect, place, structurally
alter, or add to any sign without obtaining a
permit from the Building Official designated
under the terms of the Gaylord Zoning Ordinance.
19. Signs erected by an official government body or
agency and deemed necessary for the protection
of the public health, safety, or welfare; or
those signs required by law to be displayed are
permitted.
20. Signs identifying or advertising any use or
activity defined as a "Special Use" or that are
subject to a Special Use Permit as outlined in
Section 13 of the Zoning Ordinance, shall be
approved by City Council at the time the Special
Use Permit is granted.
(ord. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)
20.408

Sec. 8. OFF-PREMISES SIGNS.
1.

Off-Premises Signs which conform with the
provisions of this ordinance shall be permitted,
as a matter of right, only in Manufacturing
(M-1) Districts.

2.

Notwithstanding the provisions, controls and
limitations of any urban renewal plan or
project, or area regulation, Off-Premises Signs
shall be permitted to be erected in the
commercial and industrial portions of such
project areas pursuant to the provisions and
limitations of this ordinance.

3.

Off-Premises Signs shall not be established at
any location having principal frontage on any
street within 300 feet of any premises which is
used for public parks, public schools, church,
courthouse, city hall or public museum having
principal frontage on the same street.

20.408

(Rev. 03/93)

�4.

No Off-Premises Sign shall be established closer
to the street than the building setback line, if
such a line exists.
If none exists, the
Off-Premise Sign may be established behind the
right-of-way line. No portion of any
Off-Premise Sign may be placed on, or extend
over the right-of-way line of any street or
highway.

5.

No Off-Premise Sign shall be constructed which
resembles any official marker erected by the
city, state, or any governmental agency, or
which by reason of position, shape or color
would conflict with the proper functioning of
any traffic sign or signal.

6.

All Off-Premises Sign shall be maintained in
good and safe structural condition. The painted
portions of outdoor Advertising Signs shall be
periodically repainted and kept in good
condition.

7.

No Off-Premises Sign or part hereof shall be
located on any premises without the consent of
the owner, holder, lessee, agent or trustee.

8.

The general area in the vicinity of any
Off-Premise Sign on undeveloped property must be
kept free and clear of weeds, debris, trash and
other refuse.

9.

In addition to the regulations and restrictions
of this ordinance, Off-Premises Signs in
adjacent areas are regulated by the Highway
Advertising Act of 1972, being Michigan Compiled
Laws 252.301, et. seq. Whenever there is a
conflict between the provisions of this
ordinance and the Highway Advertising Act, the
more restrictive regulations shall apply.

10. The maximum area for any one sign facing shall
be 720 square feet inclusive of any border and
trim, but excluding the base or apron, supports
and other structural members.
11. No Off-Premises Sign may be established within
300 feet of any other Off-Premises Sign,
measured on the same side of the same street.
12. All Off-Premises Signs shall be constructed in
accordance with the City Building and Electrical
Code.

20.408
(Rev. 03/93)

�13. The above set forth spacing between sign
structures does not apply to sign structures
separated by buildings or other obstructions in
, such manner that only one sign located within
the above spacing distances is visible from the
highway at any one time.
14. Official and on-Premise Signs, as well as any
other sign which does not constitute an
Off-Premises Sign as defined herein shall not be
counted nor shall measurements be made from them
for the purpose of determining compliance with
these spacing requirements.
15. The minimum distance between sign structures
shall be measured along the nearest edge of the
pavement between points directly opposite the
center of the signs along each side of the
highway and shall apply only to sign structures
located on the same side of the street or
highway.
16. Signs may be illuminated subject to the

following restrictions:
a.

Signs which contain, include, or are
illuminated by any flashing, intermittent,
or moving light or lights are prohibited
except those giving public service
information such as, but not limited to,
time, date, temperature, weather or similar
information.

b.

Signs which are not effectively shielded as
to prevent beams or rays from being directed
at any portion of the traveled ways and are
of such intensity or brilliance to cause
glare or impair the vision of the driver of
any motor vehicle or which otherwise
interfere with any driver's operation of a
motor vehicle are prohibited.

c.

No sign shall be so illuminated that it
interferes with the effectiveness or
obscures an official traffic sign, device or
signal.

17. No free-standing sign may exceed the building
height limitation of the zone in which it is
located unless a variance is secured from the .
Zoning Board of Appeals.
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

20.408

(Rev. 03/93)

�20.409

Sec. 9. REGULATION OF SIZE, LIGHTING AND SPACING OF
SIGNS IN ADJACENT AREAS.
(ord. deleted eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

20.410

Sec. 10. PROHIBITED SIGNS.
The following signs or devices are prohibited unless
approved by the Zoning Board of Appeals as
designated under the terms of the Gaylord Zoning
Ordinance.

20.411

1.

Signs not located on the business premises,
except for Off-Premises Signs.

2.

Signs which extend beyond the property line.

3.

Signs constructed or erected after the date of
this Ordinance or any amendment, which do not
comply with the regulations as set forth for the
District in which the sign is to be located.
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

Sec. 11. EXEMPrIONS.
The following signs are exempted from the provisions
of this ordinance except for construction and safety
requirements and those requirements contained below:

20.412

1.

PUBLIC SIGNS. Signs of a noncommercial nature
and in the public interest, erected by, or on
the order of, a public officer in the
performance of his public duty, such as safety
signs, danger signs, trespassing signs, traffic
signs, memorial plaques, signs of historical
interest and the like.

2.

INTEGRAL. Names of buildings, dates of
erection, monumental citations, commemorative
tablets and the like when carved in stone,
concrete or similar material or made an integral
part of the structure.
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

Sec. 12. EXISTING SIGNS.
1.

REMOVING OR RECONSTRUCTING SIGNS. No sign
presently erected or hereafter approved and
erected shall be substantially altered or moved,
nor shall any sign or any substantial part
thereof, which is blown down, removed or
destroyed, be re-erected, reconstructed, rebuilt
or relocated unless it is made to comply with
all applicable requirements of this ordinance.
20.409 - 20.412

(Rev. 03/93)

�20.413

20.414

2.

REPAIR OF UNSAFE SIGNS. This section shall not
be construed to prevent the maintenance, repair
or restoration to a safe condition, as directed
by the building official, of any part of an
• existing sign when damaged by storm or other
accidental emergency.

3.

RELOCATING SIGNS. Any sign that is moved to
another location either on the same or to other
premises shall be considered a new sign and a
permit shall be secured for any work perfol.'.1Iled
in connection therewith when required by this
ordinance.
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

Sec. 13. SIGN PERMITS AND PERMIT FEES.
1.

A person who desires to erect any sign regulated
by this ordinance shall first apply for a sign
permit on a form prescribed by the City Clerk.
The permit shall be approved or denied in
writing within ten (10) business days after
proper receipt of the application. All signs,
existing and proposed, must appear on the
application and a blueprint or drawing of all
signs showing size and verbiage must be
submitted with the application.
If the
application is approved, the permit shall be
issued upon payment by the applicant of a permit
fee of $10.00.

2.

Permit fees shall apply to all signs except
those exempted under the provisions of this
ordinance.

3.

At the time any permit is issued it shall be
assigned a number by the City Clerk. Such sign
permit number shall be displayed, at all times,
upon the facing of the sign for which such
permit was issued.

4.

After construction or erection of any sign or
signs, the business shall contact the City. A
member of the City Staff shall inspect the sign
to verify size, location and number of signs as
stated on the application. Any person found in
violation of the terms of the application shall
be subject to Section 14 (20.414), PENALTIES.
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

Sec. 14. PENALTIES.
Any persons violating the provisions of this
ordinance shall upon conviction thereof be subject
20.413 - 20.414
(Rev. 03/93)

�to a fine of not more than Five Hundred ($500.00)
Dollars. Each day that a violation of this
ordinance is continued or permitted to exist without
compliance shall constitute a separate offense
punishable upon conviction in the manner prescribed
in this section.
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)
20.415

Sec. 15. APPEAL.
Appeal of any section of this ordinance or of any
decision of the Zoning Administrator may be brought
to the Zoning Board of Appeals by the owner, renter,
or les~ee in accordance with Section 16 of the City
of Gaylord Zoning Ordinance. The Board of Appeals
may grant a variance from the requirements and
specifications of this ordinance or the decision of
the Zoning Administrator only upon the Board's
finding that there are practical difficulties or
unnecessary hardships in applying the strict terms
of this ordinance.
Public notice shall be printed in the official
newspaper of the City, not more than 15 or less than
8 days before the public hearing. The fee for the
variance proceedings is to be paid for in advance by
the person making the request.
(ord. amend. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

20.416

Sec. 16. EFFECTIVE DATE.
This ordinance shall be effective immediately on
February 16, 1992 •
(ord. eff. Feb. 16, 1992)

20.415 - 20.416
(Rev. 03/93)

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008374">
                <text>Gaylord_Sign-Ordinance_1993</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008375">
                <text>1993-03-14</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008376">
                <text>Gaylord Sign Ordinance</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008377">
                <text>The Gaylord Sign Ordinance went into effect on February 16, 1992 and was amended effective March 14, 1993.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008378">
                <text>Ordinances, municipal</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008379">
                <text>Gaylord (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008380">
                <text>Otsego County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008381">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008383">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008384">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008385">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008386">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038330">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54704" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58975">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/ede598b49b2ced6432ca61cddc31c866.pdf</src>
        <authentication>871fd7c9f420adc211fdd7fce64ced8a</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008373">
                    <text>CITY OF GAYLORD

1990-1995
RECREATION PLAN
Adopted: June 14, 1990

GAYL0RD
the Alpine Village
CITY COUNCIL:

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION:

Ernest Grocock, Mayor
William Tholl, Mayor Pro-Tern
Patrick Mankowski
Luke Noss
Eugene Niedzwiecki
Tom Nelson
Scott Dunn

Sandra (Toni) Brown, Chairperson
Gerald Campbell
Norm Brecheisen
Kellie Galer
Leona (Sam) Titus
Maude Gilmore
Douglas Squires
Steve Swan
Terra Deming

�City of Gaylord
PHO:\E (5 Ii) 732-4060
F:\X (517) 732-8266
225 WEST \IA!:\ STREET
GAYLORD. \1ICHIGAN 49735

~
aAYL0ftD

1hl' Alpu:e V,lla~.,

June 13, 1990

Mr. Philip Wells
Department of Natural Resources
Stevens T. Mason Building
P.O. Box 30028
Lansing, Michigan 48909
Dear Mr. Wells:
I hereby certify that the following resolution was passed at
the City Council Meeting of Monday, June 11, 1990:
Moved by Nelson, supported by Dunn to adopt the revised
City of Gaylord 1990/1995 Recreation Plan as presented.
Ayes:

Grocock, Nelson, Dunn, Noss and Thall.

Nays:

None.

Motion carried.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

/llmo__) ~~
Rebecca Curtis
City Clerk

�STATE OF MICHIGAN

IZ

NATURAL RESOURCl:'.S COMMISSION

THOMAS J . ANDERSON
MARLENE J . FLUHARTY
GORDON E. GUYER
KERRY KAMMER
ELLWOOD A. MATTSON
0 . STEWART MYERS
RAYMOND POUPORE

JAMES J. BLANCHARD. Governor

BEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
STEVENS T. MASON BUILDING
P.O. BOX 30028
LANSING. Ml 48909
DAVID F. HALES. Director

July 12, 1990

Mr. Dave Siegel, City Manager
City of Gaylord
225 W. Main
Gaylord, Michigan 49735
Dear Mr. Siegel:
SUBJECT:

City of Gaylord Recreation Plan

The community recreation plan referenced above has been approved by this
Division. City of Gaylord is now eligible to participate in our grant programs
through December 31, 1995. We ask that you provide copies of the final plan to
the Community's elected and appointed officials and make copies available to
the public.
All projects for which grant assistance is sought must be listed and justified
in the plan.
The community may amend the plan as needed.
All amendments must be
accompanied by evidence of approval by the community's governing body. Amendments must be in the form of either (1) a complete revised document, with a
cover letter describing the changes; or (2) substitute or additional pages,
with clear indication as to where they are to be inserted in the plan (the
second option applies only if the plan on file here is suitably bound). Plan
revisions will not extend the eligibility period stated above unless all plan
content is updated and the community requests extended eligibility.
If you have any questions on this, please contact me.
Sincerely,

~

jA£~ -~ ~

~ i -~:[{., Mgr. , Recreation Planning
Recreation Services Branch
Recreation Division
517-335-3038

PW:mlf
cc: Mr. Eric Antisdale, MDNR
R1026
3/89

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

I.

INTRODUCTION

4

CULTURAL AND PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF OTSEGO COUNTY

5

Transportation and Regional Location . . · ~ . .
Natural Resources . • .
. . . . . . . . . .
Water Resources . . . . . . . .
Environmental Conditions. . . .
. ..
Land Use .

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

.

Population . . . .
. . .
. . . . . . . . .
Economic Activity • • . . . . . . . .
Utilities . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
II.
III.
IV.

v.
VI.

6

7

15
19
23
26

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

28

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

40

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

43

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

44

RECREATIONAL INVENTORY
ADMINISTRATION

5
5

DEFICIENCIES AND NEEDS
LONG RANGE GOALS

SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES

. .

.....

2

. . . . . . . . .

45

�LIST OF TABLES
Page

Table#

. . . . . .

1

AGRICULTURE 1964-1982 • • • .

2

POPULATION BY CIVIL DIVISION, OTSEGO CO., MICHIGAN
1970-1988 .
. • . . . • . . . . . .
. . .

19

POPULATION BY AGE GROUP, OTSEGO CO., MICHIGAN
1970-1980.
• •..........

20

3A

POPULATION BY AGE GROUP, CITY OF GAYLORD, MI

22

4

POPULATION PROJECTIONS, OTSEGO CO.

3

17

. . . . . .

22

LIST OF FIGURES

Figure#
1

GENERALIZED SOILS MAP.

2

LAND USE MAP

3

PLANNING PROCESS AND ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCTURE.

4

ASPEN PARK NATURE AREA

5

DOUMAS PARK.

6

FREEL PARK

7

HALE PARK

8

CITY OF GAYLORD AND J:T'S PARKS

7a

. . . . . . . . . . .

..

. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . .

. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .

3

16a
41a
45a
46a
47a
47b
44a

�INTRODUCTION

The preparation of this 1990 Parks and Recreation Plan has
been a continuous process since 1985 when the City Council and
Planning Commission was studying the recreation needs of the
community. The purchase of Aspen Park, a quiet nature area,
with City Funds is a testimony to the dedication of improving
recreation needs for City, County and visitors alike.
'

Specifically this plan was formulated by the City Staff
under the guidelines set forth by the City Planning Commission.
One of the criteria for this plan was to integrate with Otsego
County's Recreation Planning. The staff received help from
numerous sources including, but not limited to the following:
Citizens of Gaylord
City Council
Gaylord Community Schools
Michigan Employment Security Commission
Northeast Michigan Council of Governments
Otsego County Parks and Recreation Department
Otsego County Soil Conservation District
The Planning Commission held a series of meetings with the
above mentioned agencies and the public was invited for input.
In some instances particular individuals were specifically
invited to work with both the Planning Commission and City
Staff. The City of Gaylord is the only incorporated City in
Otsego County therefore, great effort was taken to include the
Gaylord Community Schools and Otsego County. In some instances
City facilities are utilized by the school and the County.
Therefore, the Planning Commission took great pains to receive
input from these two groups.
The 1990 Recreation Plan formally establishes a set of
goals to further enhance the recreational opportunities for all
citizens living or visiting the Gaylord area. The City Council
and Planning Commission realize this Recreation Plan is the
first step to allow the realization of the full potential of our
park systems.
For the City of Gaylord to accomplish the stated goals and
objectives of this plan, cooperation with many local, State and
Federal agencies is necessary. With the initiative set forth by
the City Council and Planning Commission reaching the stated
goals of this plan will become a reality because of the
continued efforts to cooperate with other governmental agencies
for the benefits of all citizens.

4

�I.

CULTURAL AND PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION OF THE CITY OF GAYLORD
AND OTSEGO COUNTY
TRANSPORTATION AND REGIONAL LOCATION

The City of Gaylord has the advantage of being centrally
located in northern Michigan.
It is serviced by Interstate 75,
which as of this writing, {March 1, 1990) is the only four lane
interstate freeway system in northern Michigan. The freeway
provides convenient access for travel to and from populated
areas of southcentral and southeastern Michigan. The freeway
has much impact on the economic livelihood of the City and
County, providing convenient access for tourists downstate. The
major east-west route serving Gaylord and Otsego County is
M-32. This route connects Gaylord with Alpena, the largest city
of northeast Michigan, a distance of 72 miles. To the west,
M-32 indirectly provides access to Traverse City, Charlevoix and
Petoskey.
The Gaylord Industrial Park Airport, located one mile
southwest of downtown Gaylord, provides both private and charter
service.
Charter service is provided by one company. The air
field is capable of accommodating a 727. It is a Class A
airport, has a full-time manager and is open seven days a week.
The City of Gaylord and Otsego County are serviced by the
Detroit and Mackinaw Railway. There is one main line running
north-south through the city and county in close proximity to
I-75. No passenger service is available on this line.

NATURAL RESOURCES
The most important natural resources of the area in terms
of providing a foundation for recreational activities are the
abundance of trees, clean air, clean water and wild game. Each
of these also provides an important economic base for the area.
Tourists, primarily from southern Michigan are attracted to
Gaylord because of the recreational amenities available. Many
jobs in Gaylord and Otsego County are highly dependent on the
tourist dollar. Also, the abundance of trees supports a healthy
lumber and wood products industry. Georgia-Pacific, located in
Gaylord, employs approximately 275 people and produces wood
products.

5

�Water Resources

The City of Gaylord has very minimal surface water
resources. There are no lakes or streams in the City of
Gaylord. Scott's pond, located partially in the City's Aspen
Park, is the only surface water. This pond consisting of a few
acres is home to two beaver families and a source of drinking
water for native animals in the area.
The City is blessed however, with abundant drinking water.
The City recently built a $7.2 million dollar wastewater
treatment facility to help protect this valuable natural
resource. The problem of pollution of our natural resources was
the driving force that led to the new facility being built in
1986. The urbanization trend and increase in population
necessitates the proper removal and disposal of domestic and
industrial wastes to avoid any possibility of contamination to
the City's water supply and resulting hazards to the Community's
health.

6

�Environmental Conditions

a.

Soils &amp; Subsurface Conditions

Soils in the Plan of Study Area (City of Gaylord) are a result
of a large intermorainal outwash plain exhibiting deep granular
soils with high permeability and little evidence of surfa~e
drainage features. The predominant soil series within the study
Area are of the Rubicon-Grayling Association, the Kalkaska-East
Lake-Mancelona Association, or the Leelanau-Emmet-Kalkaska
Association. The U. s. Department of Agriculture system of
classification describes these associations as follows:

RUBICON-GRAYLING ASSOCIATION
These are nearly level to gently sloping, well drained, sandy
soils. Areas of these soils are popularly designated as
Jackpine plains. They have low natural fertility, low moisture
holding capacity, and rapid permeability.

KALKASKA-EAST LAKE-MANCELONA ASSOCIATION

These are nearly level to gently sloping, well drained sandy and
gravelly soils of the hardwood plains. These soils are slightly
more fertile and hold slightly greater amounts of moisture than
those in the Rubicon-Grayling Association.

LEELANAU-EMMET-KALKASKA ASSOCIATION
These are sloping to steep, well drained sandy and loamy soils
on complex rolling areas and hills. They range from medium to
moderately low or low in natural fertility and moisture holding
capacity. Permeability ranges from moderate to rapid.
Underlying the surface soils of the area is a very thick stratem
of sand with a few isolated clay lenses which are typically less
than five feet thick. The bedrock is located at a depth of more
than 600 feet.
Figure 6 shows the generalized soils for the
Study Area.

7

�.

-

_,

~

r
·i

I

f.

I

,r
,.

l

r

t
l

•

l
"Ultt...

I
I

l4

I
1...-.

I

~

-~-

l

I
I
I
I
I

~

I!

· -umn

I

·I , :I ~
'I

•

IiI
I
I
I

__ ..JI

Cl
I
H

I
¢. ..$iiii.!! . -

--·--

L

. . . . . . 0A-J.A- IC

·rI ·-= ,..... ___

0

KALKASKA

~ RUBICON

EAST LAKE

MANCELONA

GENE~ALIZED

SOILS

GRAYLING

an LEELANAU • . EMMEI
mJ CARBONDALE •

TAWAS

KALKASKA

FIGURE 1

ROSCOMMON
SOURCE: U.S. :tPARTM::NT

7a

OF lG"ICV...r:q~

o.::s

�b.

Hydrology &amp; Topography

The Plan of Stuoy Area lies primarily within the drainage basin
of the Sturgeon River. The headwaters of the Sturgeon River is
located to the northeast of the City of Gaylord and flows in a
northerly direction where it flows into Burt and Mullett lakes.
Drainage out of these lakes is to the north down the Cheboygan
River to Lake Huron. A small portion in the southern part of
the Study Area drains into Otsego Lake and then to Lake Huron
through the AuSable watershed.
The topography of the Plan of Study Area displays natural slopes
generally less than 1.5 percent. This relatively flat terrain
is evident throughout most of the Plan of Study Area except in
the northeasterly portion where gullies can be found. These
gullies are tributaries to the Sturgeon River.

c.

Climate

Otsego County's climate is classified as
temperate-humid-continental.
Day to day weather is
characterized by constantly changing weather patterns. The
county seldom experiences prolonged periods of excessively hot
weather or of extremely cold weather. The prevailing winds are
predominantly westerly. The average length of the freeze-free
period, the number of days between the average date of the last
spring freeze (32o F.) and the average date of the first fall
freeze (32o F.) is 116 days.
The average annual snowfall is 136.2 inches.
Area lies within the "Lake Snowbelt".

The Plan of Study

The maximum one hour rainfall expected to occur in the county at
fifty year intervals is about 2 to 2.2 inches, the maximum
estimated fifty year, twenty-four hour rainfall is about 4 to
4.5 inches.

8

�Inventory of Lakes in Otsego County

,
There are a total of 336 lakes/ponds in the County
according to a Michigan Lake Inventory Bulletin done by the
Department of Resource Development at Michigan State
University. Twenty-six of these lakes are 50 or more acres in
size. The largest is Otsego Lake covering approximately 1,972
acres or 3.08 square miles.
Names of Lake. Location &amp; Area

Description of Lake

..

Bear (Big) Lake
Panfishing;
100% mineral
shoreline; maximum
depth 30 feet;
public access

Sec. 1, 2, of T29, 30N, RlW,
435 acres

Bear (Little) Lake
Private development
around most of lake
100% mineral
shoreline; maximum
depth 35 feet

Sec. 2, T29, 30N, RlW,
127 acres

Douglas Lake
Panfishing;
100% mineral
shoreline

Sec. 9, T29N, RlW,
94 acres
Crapo Lake

Maximum depth

Sec. 30, T29N, RlW,
92 acres

3 feet; panfishing;
60% mineral
shoreline,
40% organic

Bass Lake
Panfishing, trout
fishing; maximum
depth 20 feet;
90% mineral
shoreline;
10% organic

Sec. 1, 2, 11, T29N, R2W
70 acres

9

�Turtle Lake
Undeveloped natural
lake; 20% mineral
shoreline,
80% organic

Sec. 4, 33, T2~, JON, R2W
164 acres

Emerald Lake
Panfish, pike;
maximum depth
35 feet; 75% mineral
shoreline;
25% organic

Sec. 1, 6, T29N, R2,3W
53 acres

Opal Lake
Public access;
panfish, pike;
100% mineral
shoreline; maximum
depth 42 feet

Sec. 1, 12, T29N, R3W
122 acres

Otsego Lake
Public access sites
including
beachfront; much
of shoreline is
privately owned;
panfish, pike,
muskies; 90% mineral
shoreline;
10% organic

T29,30N, R3W
1972 acres, 3.08 sq. miles

Chub Lake
Panfish, pike, trout;
maximum depth 74
feet; 75% mineral
shoreline,
25% organic

Sec. 14, 23, T29N, R3W
75 acres

Heart Lake
Residential developed
lake; 100% mineral
shoreline. Public
access.

Sec. 20, T29N, R3W
65 acres

10

�Barefoot Lake
Sec. 29, 32, T29N
R3W, 225 acres •

Public access;
prankish; pike;
100% mineral
shoreline

Lynn Lake
Sec. 23, 24, 25, 26 T29N
RAW, 52 acres

Undeveloped natural
lake; panicking;
10% mineral
shoreline,
90% organic

Big Lake
Sec. 7, 8, T30N, RAW
126 acres

Public access;
prankish, pike;
90% mineral,
10% organic; maximum
depth 81 feet

Dixon Lake
Sec. 14, T30N, R3W
78 acres

Public access;
panfish, pike;
maximum depth 30
feet; 100% mineral
shoreline

Perch Lake
Sec. 30, T30N, R3W
65 acres

Much of shoreline
privately developed;
panfish; 100% organic
shoreline; maximum
depth 26 feet

Thomas Lake
Sec. 23, T30N, R4W
53 acres

Undeveloped natural
lake; panfish, pike;
100% mineral
shoreline

Lake Manuka
Sec. 25, 35, 36, T30N
R4W, 163 acres

Public access;
panfishing; maximum
depth 27 feet
100% mineral
shoreline

11

�Buhl Lake
Sec. 32, T30N, R4W
95 acres
"

Undeveloped natural
lake with 100%
mineral shoreline

South Five Lakes
Sec. 2 9 , 3 O , 31 , 3 2
T31N, R3W, 50 acres

Undeveloped natural
lake

Lake Five
Sec. 29, 30, T31N, R3W
64 acres

Undeveloped natural
lake

Porcupine Lake
Sec. 13, 23, 24, T31N
R4W, 61 acres

Panfishing; 100%
mineral shoreline;
maximum depth
23 feet

Lake Twenty-seven
Sec. 27, T31N, R4W
120 acres

Some private
development
around lake; 100%
mineral shoreline

Guthrie Lake
Sec. 36, T29N, R3W
115 acres

Private development 100% mineral
shoreline

Lake Horicon
Sec. 1, 2, 11, 12, T29N
R4W, 63 acres

Undeveloped natural
lake with 100%
mineral shoreline

Lake Tecon
Sec. 2, 11, 14, T29N, R4W
270 acres

Some private
development on west
side of lake;
panfishing; 100%
mineral shoreline;
maximum depth 3 feet

12

�Minerals
Mineral Resources in the county have also contributed to
the economy. Otsego county, in 1989, was one of the leading
county in the state in terms of oil production.
It is estimated
that 400 people are employed in the drilling, exploration and
production of gas and oil. Nearly six million barrels of oil
were produced in the county in 1983. Also, in that year, over
12 million cubic feet of natural gas was produced, making Otsego
County the 4th leading gas producing county in the state.
Hydrology
Otsego County has a total of 6,682 acres ot surface water
in the form of 116 lakes. The county also has 140 miles of
trout streams. Fishing is very popular for trout on most
streams, with several lakes also having trout populations. The
warmer lakes normally have bluegill, bass, perch and pike.
Tiger musky have also been stocked in several lakes and are
reaching trophy size. A complete inventory of county lakes and
streams is on a preceding page.
Groundwater supplies in the county are very productive in
the predominant gravels and unconsolidated sands of the glacial
drift. The groundwater aquifers are recharged by precipitation
which is readily absorbed by the permable soils. Individual
wells near the lakes and streams are usually quite shallow due
to the existing high water table. Wells located on high
moraines may be in excess of 250 feet. Wells in the county of 6
inch in diameter or more will yield from 10-500 gallons per
minute.
The county consists basically of two watersheds, one being
the Cheboygan watershed draining northerly and consisting of the
Sturgeon, Pigeon and Black Rivers. The southern part of the
county drains south into the AuSable watershed.
Soil Classification
The soils breakdown presented in Figure 5 was obtained from
information made available by the Soil Conservation Service.
The following notes applying to the individual soil types listed
on the map, are taken from the pamphlet "Interpretations of the
General Soils Map of Otsego County, Michigan".
Soil Association 1:

Rubicon-Grayling-Kalkaska

These are nearly level to undulating, well drained sandy
soils, popularly designated as jack pine plains. They have low
natural fertility, low moisture holding capacity and rapid
permeability (dominant slope 0-6%).

13

�Soil Association 2:

Kalkaska-East Lake-Mancelona

These are . nearly level to undulating, well drained sandy
and gravelly soils of the hardwood plains. These soils are
slightly more fertile and hold slightly greater amounts of
moisture than those listed in Association 1 (dominant slope
0-6%).
Soil Association 3:

Coventry-Karlin

These are nearly level to undulating, well drained sandy
and loamy soils occupying high plateau-like areas in the
uplands. They have medium to moderately low fertility and
moisture holding capacity with permeability ranging from
moderate to rapid (dominant slope 0-6%).
Soil Association 4:

Rubicon-Graycalm-Montcalm

These are undulating to rolling well drained sandy soils on
uplands, including dry valleys, benches, plateau-like areas and
many small lakes. These soils have moderately low to low
natural fertility and moisture holding capacity and rapid
permeability (dominant slopes 2-12% and 6-25%).
Soil Association 5:

Kalkaska-Blue Lake-Rubicon

These are dominantly sloping to steep, well drained sandy
soils. Most areas consist of a network of ridges enclosing dry
valleys with steep escarpment-like sides. The soils are low in
natural fertility and moisture holding capacity with rapid
permeability (dominant slopes 2-12% and 6-25%).
Soil Association 6:

Emmet-Leelanau

These are gently sloping to sloping, well drained sandy and
loamy soils on the undulating to rolling uplands. Major soils
in this association have medium to moderately low natural
fertility and moisture holding capacity with moderate to
moderately rapid permeability (dominant slope 2-12%).
Soil Association 7:

Leelanau-Emmet-Kalkaska-Mancelona

These are sloping to steep, well drained sandy and loamy
soils on complex rolling acres and hills. They range from
medium to moderately low or low in natural fertility and
moisture holding capacity with moderate to rapid fertility
(dominant slopes 2-12% and 6-25%).
Soil Association 8:

Nester-Kawkawlin-Iosco

These are nearly level to gently sloping, well drained to
somewhat poorly drained loamy soils of the till plain, including
random small wet spots and swales. Major soils in this
association have moderately high natural fertility and moisture
14

�holding capacity with moderately slow permeability (dominant
slope 0-6%).
Soil Association 9:

Ubly-Nester-Menominee

These are gently sloping to rolling, well drained sandy and
loamy soils on uplands, including random small muck-filled
depressions. Major soils in this association have medium to
moderately high natural fertility and moisture holding
capacity. Permeability ranges from moderately rapid to
moderately slow (dominant slope 2-18%).
Soil Association 10:

Carbondale-Tawas-Roscommon.

This association consists of poorly drained sandy soils and
mucks occurring mainly in stream channels and swamps. they have
low natural fertility with moderately rapid to rapid
permeability. Moisture holding capacity is high in the organic
soils and low in the sandy mineral soils (dominant slope 0-2%).
LAND USE
Otsego County has 334,272 acres or 527 square miles of land
area. Of this, 91,101 acres (142.3 sq. miles) or 27.25 percent
of the land in the county is owned by the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources. The land use analysis presented here
explores the county's physical character. This information is
important since land and water resources play such a vital role
in establishing the character of the county and in providing
opportunities for recreational activities. Total land uses were
tabulated by Michigan State University in their publication
"County and Regional Facts" (1979).
These figures show that the
land use for Otsego County is:

Total Area:
Inland Water:
Land Surface

344,172 acres
6,784 acres
337,388 acres

Forested:
Agriculture:
Transportation:
Recreation:
Urban:
Other:

251,000
45,904
9,120
489
1,261
29,614

acres
acres
acres
acres
acres
acres

( 74.4%)
( 13.6%)
(
2.7%)
(
0.1%)
(
0.4%)
(
8.8%)

TOTAL:

337,388 acres

(100.0%)

15

�A general synopsis of land use in Otsego County includes
the following (See Land Use Map on following page):
Forest land makes up the bulk of the county's land use
(approximately 75%). Over one-third of the forest land in the
county is state owned with the remainder in private hands.
Agricultural land is composed primarily of small to medium
sized farms (under 500 acres) producing hay, potatoes or corn.
The amount of land devoted to agriculture has decreased by
nearly one-third since 1964.
Residential land is concentrated in the City of Gaylord,
portions of the surrounding townships, along the major lake
shores, and in the smaller villages of the county. Nearly 85%
of all residential structures in the county are single family
units. Mobile homes account for approximately one out of every
nine residential structures in the county.
There are over 20,000 subdivided parcels in the county.
Currently, 2,500 of these parcels are developed. Another 2,900
were platted before the existing building codes took effect and
are unsuitable for development. This leaves over 14,000 legally
subdivided parcels available for development throughout the
county.
There are also nearly 1,000 ten acre parcels throughout the
county, many of which are currently undeveloped and could be
available for future residential use.
Commercial facilities within the county fall into three
categories based on the markets they serve.
1.

Travel services along I-75 and Old 27 for those
passing through or visiting the area.

2.

County-wide specialized services provided in the City
of Gaylord for all residents of the area as well as
travelers and vacationers.

3.

Convenience facilities located in or near villages
throughout the county. These serve the more rural
year-round and seasonal residents plus the visitors or
travelers and provide general goods and services.

Industrial activity in the county is related to either
manufacturing (primarily durable goods) or resource extraction.
Manufacturing operations are located at the southern edge of
Gaylord and in or near Vanderbilt with major products including
construction materials, auto components and copper tubing.
Resource extraction includes several gravel pits located
throughout the county as well as oil and gas drilling and
processing sites. The county's location along the Niagaran Reef
16

�•

1
•
I

H

I

I :.-.,,

5

--·--

L

-D•- IC

LAND USE MAP
ll
NlUSTRIAl.
EXTilACTI'IIE
-AGR!CULn.RAL

~ PUB.JC

FOMST
. "'R'!IVATI FOREST
:~ Pl.A TTI:O SUSIJVISIONS
~::lECREATICJ,IAl.
PUBLIC FAQUT'r

g

16a

FIGURE 2

�has meant increased oil and gas drilling in recent years which
has led to the construction of several pipelines and gas
sweetening plants in the county. Recent emphasis has shifted to
Antrim exploration and processing period.
Recreation activity is an important element in both Otsego
County's general character and its economy. Public recreation
lands include extensive state forest holdings, as well as the
State Park and County park located along Otsego Lake. These are
general recreation facilities providing sites for a wide range
of individual or group outdoor activities. The City and county
also have a wide range of privately owned recreation sites for
more specific activities (skiing, golf, etc.) and offers
extensive opportunities for recreation on privately owned
undeveloped property (hunting, snowmobiling, hiking, etc.).
The lakes and rivers of the area are another important part
of the county's character and provide many opportunities for
recreation activity.
Lake and riverfront property has become
valuable for both its residential as well as recreational
potential.
The City and county's connection with I-75 has helped to
make it an excellent location for commercial, recreation and
industrial activities.
East-west connections to other portions
of the state are somewhat inadequate and could be improved. The
county has adequate freight service, but is lacking passenger
service by rail. Daily passanger air service has been initiated
in the spring of 1990.
Agriculture and Forestry
Agriculture and forestry combined to make up 88% of Otsego
County's land use. Forestry plays an important role in total
land use and in the county's economic picture. Approximately
75% of the land surface of the county is forested with another
13% in agriculture. Less than 1% of the county's land is used
for urban activities.
TABLE

I

AGRICULTURE 1964-1982

OTSEGO COUNTY
Year

Number of Farms

1964
1968
1974
1978
1982

266
172
132
151
142

% Change

Acres in Farms

% Change

61,867
46,052
35,308
41,500
41,510

- 26%
- 23%
18%

- 35.0%
- 23.0%
14.4%
6.0%
17

�Table I shows the number of farms and farm acreage for the
county from 1964 - 1982. Agricultural land in the county is
made up primar~ly of small to medium size farms.
In 1982, 80%
of all county farms were between SO and 500 acres in size. Only
four farms in the county were over 1,000 acres. Major products
include potatoes, oats, corn, livestock and dairy products.
With 63% of the county's forested area in private
ownership, there has been an increasing tendency to split large
holdings into 10 acre parcels for seasonal and year-round
residences or other uses. These smaller parcels, owned by a
diversity of individuals, cannot be effectively managed for
productive timber cutting and their continued increase reduces
the return from this important resource.
~
The physical form of a community is the result of the actions of
many individuals and agencies. The buildings and structures
created by private enterprise requires supporting public
facilities such as streets, utilities, parks and schools. The
manner in which these public and private improvements are
related to each other largely determines the character of our
community.
Proper planning of these relationships results in an
orderly, attractive community.
Residential uses occupy the greatest amount of developed land
area within Gaylord. Though the residential pattern is located
fairly uniformly around the central business district, new
residential developments have been primarily taking place to the
northeast and north. Scattered residential uses are found along
M-32 to the east and Old Highway 27 to the North. The
long-established business district is located at the crossing of
M-32 and Business Loop 27, generally the geographic center of
the City. This was the largest concentration of commercial land
uses, but new development within the past few years along M-32
to the west and along Business Loop 27 to the South are the new
developing commercial areas.
Industrial land uses form a definite pattern in Gaylord. This
being concentrated along Dickerson Road which leads to the
Gaylord Air Industrial Park. The Industrial park comprises the
remaining industrial area of the City. Public and semi-public
uses occupy a considerable amount of the area within and around
the City of Gaylord. The Hidden Valley Ski Club and golf course
forms a large mass on the east side of the City; the community
School, and City property forms a large mass to the south; The
former state hospital which is now county owned property occupy
large tracts to the north. West of Interstate 75 is the Otsego
County Airport which occupies a large tract which impedes
development in that area.
PU.blic and semi-public uses in
Gaylord occupy a considerable share of the developed land within
the City.

18

�POPULATION
Table 2 s~ows population by civil division within the
county. A quick reference to the county map, indicates that
most of the population as well as the most significant growth is
in the municipalities around the I-75 corridor from Gaylord
south to the Crawford County line. The amenities and
recreational opportunities offered at Otsego Lake may be
responsible for more rapid development in this particular area
of the county.
Developments that offer some degree of privacy
of "space" between neighbors, such as Michaywe', are currently
attractive to many residents. Michaywe' had an excess of 40 new
homes constructed in 1989.

TABLE 2
POPULATION BY CIVIL DIVISION
OTSEGO COUNTY. MICHIGAN 1970-1988
Civil Division
Otsego County
Bagley Township
Charlton Township
Chester Township
Corwith Township
Dover Township
Elmira Township
Gaylord, City of
Hayes Township
Livingston Township
Otsego Lake Township
Vanderbilt, Village of

1988

1980

1970

16,900
4,630
1,010
710
1,390
410
1,030
3,440
960
1,810
1,360
560

14,993
4,106
823

10,422
2,294
573
332
1,126
317
486
3,012

661
1,313
432
899
3,011
888
1,703

416

1,157

1,393
473

525

522

19

(1970-1988)
% Change

62.2
101. 8
76.3
76.3
23.4
29.3
111.9
14.2
130.8
29.9
187.5
7.3

�TABLE 3
POPULATION BY AGE GROUP
OTSEGO COUNTY, MICHIGAN 1970-1980
Age Group
Total
00-04
05-14
15-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-64
65+

1980

% of Total

1970

% of Total

14,993
1,252
2,710
2,550
2,287
1,757
1,446
1,357
1,634

8.4
18.1
17.0
15.3
11.7
9.6
9.1
10.9

10,422
1,033
2,460
1,538
l,3oj
1,110
1,026
965
987

9.9
23.6
14.7
12.5
10.6
9.8
9.2
9.5

A major consequence to the area is the influx of seasonal
and temporary residents. During the summer months population
estimates have shown more than a 200% increase over the
permanent population•. This figure only includes
seasonal/temporary housing residents, campers and renters at
commercial lodges. It does not include private camps and
resorts, visitors who stay with family or friends or mobile
homes. Although many of these seasonal/temporary residents
utilize the area beaches and state forestlands, they also are
showing an increasing demand for day-use of the City and County
recreational facilities. The winter season is also becoming
increasingly popular with temporary residents utilizing ski
slopes, ski trails and snowmobile trails in the county.
The Gaylord area is promoted as the Golf Mecca, the heart
of America's summer golf capital. Several new championship golf
courses have recently been built with more slated for
construction in 1990. In 1989, 200,000 rounds of golf were
played compared to 145,903 in 1987. The total golf impact on
the area economy is $112,500,000**· The recent impact of
golfing in the area has been phenominal.
Table 3 provides a breakdown of population by age groups
within Otsego County. The percentage of total population is
given to show the relative importance to the total population.

*

Figure derived from Clean Water Program Interim Outputs,
NEMCOG 1977

**

Gaylord Area Convention and Tourism Bureau

20

�The 5-14 age group was the largest in 1970 and 1980, in both
relative and in absolute terms. The relative increase of the
15-24 age group in 1980 is partly from the aging of the 5-14 age
group of 1970. Relative increases were noted in the 25-34 and
35-44 age group as well. Much of the increase of these age
groups was from migration into the county.
Additionally, important increases occurred in the 65 and
over category. The importance of a large 5-14, 15-24 and 65 and
over age group concerning recreation must be recognized. The
5-14 and 15-24 age groups are most likely to require and utilize
recreational provisions. Also, the 65 and over age group is
composed of retirees frequently with considerable leisure time
which creates a need for recreational opportunities for senior
citizens.
A major component of population change, in addition to
births and deaths, is migration in and out of a community. Net
migration is determined by subtracting deaths from births and
comparing this sum to population change recorded by the Census.
With a population increase from 1970-1980 of 4,571 (14,993 10,422) we want to know how much was natural increase and how
much was from migration. During this period there was 1,140
more births than deaths, thus the natural increase•. Therefore,
the remainder of the increase, 3,431 people migrated to the
county from 1970-1980. This means that 75% of the population
increase from 1970-1980 was from migration into the county.
Population projections for the county are based on current
trends. Department of Management and Budget (DMB) estimates for
1983 for the county placed the population at 15,283 and projects
the 1990 population to be 18,569. The DMB projects the 1995
Otsego County population to be 21,586 and the 2000 population to
be at 24,792.

*

Source:

Office of Revenue and Tax Analysis, Michigan
Department of Management and Budget
21

�TABLE 3A
POPULATION BY AGE GROUP
CITY OF GAYLORD*
AGE GROUP

o -

POPULATION COUNT

5 Years of Age

198
189
276
327
223
197
167
154
162
153
147
167
121
131
127
272

5 - 9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-29
30-34
35-39
40-44
45-49
50-54
55-59
60-64
65-69
70-74
75+

Total City Population

3,011

Female Population

1,686

Male Population

1,325

..

TABLE 4
POPULATION PROJECTIONS
OTSEGO COUNTY

Year

Population

1970
1980
1990
2000

*

Source:

10,422
14,993
18,569
24,792

Migration

3,431
2,305
4,509

Total
Increase
4,571
3,576
6,223

% of Total Increases
from Migration
75%
64.5%
72.5%

GENERAL POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS, 1980
United States Census Bureau, Page 276
22

�ECONOMIC ACTIVITY

The unemployment rate for 1989 for Otsego County was 7.2
percent, an increase of .4 percent from 1988. The Gaylord Labor
Market Area has had the lowest unemployment rates in northeast
Michigan for the past several years. The average unemployment
rate for the eight counties of northeast Michigan was 10.9
percent in 1988 and 10.6 percent in 1989.
Non-manufacturing jobs accounted for 72.4 percent of total
employment in Otsego County in 1989. The service industries
combined with retail trade are responsible for 82.2 percent of
the non-manufacturing jobs. With the addition of retail
construction this trend appears to be increasing.

City and County Employers

The following is a list of the major employers (over 50
employees) in Otsego County:

Carter's

Gaylord

65 employees

Elias Brothers

Gaylord

65 employees

Gaylord comm. Schools

Gaylord

250 employees

Gaylord Opportunity

Gaylord

85 employees

Georgia Pacific

Gaylord

275 employees

Glen's Market

Gaylord

160 employees

GTE North

Gaylord

75 employees

Old Kent Bank

Gaylord &amp; Branches

75 employees

Higgins Industry

Vanderbilt

75 employees

Holiday Inn

Gaylord

65 employees

K-Byte Co.

Gaylord

250 employees

Mark One Automation

Gaylord

75 employees

Mayfair Plastics

Gaylord

50 employees

McDonald's

Gaylord

60 employees

23

�Otsego Mem. Hospital

Gaylord

250 employees

Otsego Ski Club

Gaylord

100 employees

Provincial House

Gaylord

100 employees

Standard Products Co.

Gaylord

340 employees

Otsego Co. Courthouse

Gaylord

80 employees

Sugar Bowl

Gaylord

50 employees

Van Products

Vanderbilt

75 employees

The list below gives the smaller employers in the City &amp; county:

Alpine Molding, Inc.

Plastic Products

Bozzer Brothers

Construction Machinery

Central Printing Corp.

Publishing, advertising

16 employees

E-Z Lift, Inc.

Door Manufacturing

14 employees

Jobbers Warehouse

Wholesale Auto Parts

16 employees

Michigan Hardwoods

Pallets, Skids, Wood

3 employees

Norandex Sales Co.

Metal Doors, Siding

5 employees

North Central Steel
&amp; Fabricators

Steel Warehousing

3 employees

Otsego Log Cabin Co.

Bldg. &amp; Components

16 employees

Peet Packing Co.

Meat Packing Plant

12 employees

Roberts Boring &amp; Mfg.

Fabricating, Mach. Shop

50 employees

24

18 employees
4 employees

�The preceding list of Basic Employers in Otsego County show
the diversity of the numbers of employer's and the different
types of produots, manufacturing and services offered in the
Gaylord and Otsego County.
Because there are no profiles and
civilian labor estimates available are done by using the base
employment for the County of 7850 and estimating the different
types of jobs.
Seasonal employment for the summer months are estima~ed to
increase an additional 15 to 20 percent. The civilian labor
force in the City is estimated as follows:
2,100 people
Labor Force
1,900 people
Employment
Estimated Unemployment
300 people
(With a rate of 14.3%) *

* Source is Michigan Employment Security Commission

25

�UTILITIES

The county's utility system includes the private suppliers
of electric, natural gas, telephone and cable television
services along with the publicly owned and operated
Crawford-Otsego landfill and Gaylord water and sewer systems.
These suppliers (with the exception of the Gaylord systems) are
faced with the task of providing services to a relatively low
density, dispersed population.
The most widely distributed service is electricity,
provided by Consumers Power and Top-a-Michigan Rural Electric.
Electrical service has expanded rapidly over the past 10 years
and there is a general feeling that requirements could double by
the year 2000. At the present time, there are no problems
envisioned in regard to expanding service to new users and
meeting future demands.
Natural gas is provided to portions of the county by the
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company. Gas is supplied by a
pipeline which generally follows Interstate 75, providing
service to the Waters, Gaylord and Vanderbilt area. Expanded
service would be possible to developed locations near the
existing service area, but the cost of extending lines makes
service beyond this area unlikely. Bottled gas, provided by
private suppliers, is widely used for heating and cooking in
portions of the county located away from the natural gas line.
Gaylord's water and sewer system currently serves the City
of Gaylord as well as developed areas immediately adjacent to
the city. The water system has been expanding at approximately
15% per year with current average daily usage at 550,000
gallons. The existing collection system could adequately meet
increased needs, the water distribution system has been expanded
and improved to meet the increase in demand.
It is expected
that most new service required in Gaylord will be for commercial
uses, with little room for residential expansion in the city.
The city's wastewater treatment facility currently handles
480,000 gallons of sewage per day, with a capacity of 850,000
gallons. This system was constructed in 1988 and should have a
useful life of 20 years.
In January 1986, the City of Gaylord
was awarded an Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Grant for
3.5 million dollars for construction of a new wastewater
treatment facility. A Federal Housing Administration (FHA) loan
of 3.4 million dollars was secured by the City of Gaylord for
the balance of the total cost of the project. An existing odor
problem was eliminated completely with the new treatment
facility.
The remainder of the county is served by individual wells
and septic tanks. In recent years, approximately four to five
hundred permits for wells and septic systems have been issued
each year.
In most portions of the county there are few
26

�problems associated with those systems. In the Johannesburg
area heavy clay soils often require extensive digging before an
adequate disposal area can be established and this could limit
residential expansion. The areas around many of the county's
major lakes and along Old 27 south of Gaylord have been
extensively developed, often creating problems in maintaining
proper levels of water quality.
Careful consideration must be given to protecting the
county's water resources from the effects of residential,
commercial and industrial development. Adequate drain fields
and proper maintenance of septic systems are important elements
in safeguarding water quality and should be closely monitored.
New developments should include provisions for nandling
household waste efficiently and adequately. Continued growth
should not be stifled by environmental restrictions but must be
located and designed so as to best fit in with the character of
the county while having a minimal impact on the area's resources.

27

---

-

-

-

-- -

-

-

�II.

RECREATIONAL INVENTORY

•

Recreation activities are a key factor in establishing the
character of the City and County. As stated earlier, state
forest land accounts for over 90,000 acres within the county, or
27% of the total land surface. These lands are located
primarily in the northeast and southeast sections of the county,
along the southern border and west of Otsego Lake. There are
seven state forest campgrounds, providing over 150 campsites,
located within the county. Hiking, cross-country skiing,
boating, canoeing and fishing are other primary public uses of
the county's state forest lands.
The county's water resources also play an important role
in recreation activity. Public facilities on the lakes include
the Otsego Lake State and County Parks. The state park is
located along the southeast lake shore and includes over 200
campsites on 62 acres with easy access to Otsego Lake for
boating and fishing. The county park, on the lake's northwest
shore, provides facilities for picnicking, boating and extensive
day use, and camping.
Many other smaller lakes are located throughout the county,
especially through the southern sections. These are used both
during the summer months (for boating, skiing, or fishing) and,
less intensely, during the winter months (for skating,
cross-country skiing or ice fishing).
In addition to the lakes, Otsego County has an extensive
system of rivers and wetlands. The Sturgeon, Pigeon and Black
Rivers all originate in the central portion of the county, while
the north and middle branches of the AuSable flow through the
southern sections of the county. These rivers offer many
opportunities for fishing and canoeing. As with the County's
lakes, property along these rivers is valuable for residential
purposes. Currently there are no special guidelines for
protecting the county's water resources from misuse or over
development. This should be an important element in efforts to
maintain the character of the area.
Other facilities located throughout the county provide a
wide range of recreation opportunities. There are some public
recreation facilities that are currently lacking within the
county, however. There is no public indoor swimming facility,
for instance, and no community auditorium. It might be possible
to combine these facilities at one central location with
additional space for public recreation such as tennis,
racquetball or meeting rooms. A facility of this nature could
serve a wide range of purposes for all county residents.

28

�In addition to a centralized activity site, recreational
opportunities could be increased by developing several smaller,
less intensive ~ites throughout the county. These could offer
opportunities for hiking, cross-country skiing and nature study
and could be developed to complement the current distribution of
parks and play fields.
In addition to public facilities available for recreational
use, the county has a wide range of privately operated
facilities including ten golf courses, two downhill ski areas,
swimming pools, riding stables and campgrounds. These
facilities are generally located near Gaylord and either M-32
and Old 27 and serve local residents along with seasonal
residents and visitors.
~
Beyond private and public facilities for recreation,
considerable activity takes place on private, individually owned
property. Snowmobiling, hunting and cross-country skiing are
seasonal activities that are popular throughout northern
Michigan, both for people living in the area and for those
traveling from southern Michigan or the Midwest and Canada.

29

�RECREATION PARKS AND FACILITIES

BAGLEY TOWNSHIP
Name

Facilities Available

ownership

Otsego Lake
County Park

27 acre park with 500' sand beach;
40 campsites; pavilion, boat launch,
playground, picnic tables, park store

County

Dixon Lake Public
Fishing Site

Boat launch fishing, swimming

Township

Pleasant View
Public Access Site

Otsego Lake used for swimming

Township

Otsego Co. Airport

Two Softball diamonds

Township

KOA Kampground

130 camping sites; swimming pool,
store, playground, movies,
miniature golf, hiking and bike
trails, laundry, restroom and
showers, playground

Private

Northland
Sportsman's Club

Skeet shooting, archery range,
rifle range, and meeting hall

Private

Norden Hem

cottages; cross-country ski
trails; horseback riding

Private

Ray MacMullen
Memorial Park

Five acre park donated to little
league; baseball fields, picnic tables

Michaywe'

18 hole public golf course,
downhill ski area with nine
slopes; seven miles of cross
country ski trails; travel trailer
resort with sixty densely wooded
acres for camping; store, playground
laundry, ice, showers, movies,
planned activities, miniature golf,
bike rental, open year-round

Private

Fireside Softball
diamonds

Two softball diamonds

Private

Dr. Roberts.
Libke Memorial
Fields

Three softball fields

County

30

�Approximately seven miles of
riding and bike trails; cross
country skiing trail in
southeastern part of the township

State

Riding &amp;
Hiking Trail

Horseback riding; hiking, crosscountry skiing (part of county
trail) approximately 14 miles in
township

State

Big Bear Lake

Public fishing site and camP,ground
including cottages

State

West Twin Lake

Public fishing site

State

JohannesburgLewiston High
School

Baseball/softball field, football
field, tennis courts, basketball
court, ice rink, play equipment, track

state

Big Lake

Public Fishing Site

State

Emerald Lake

Public Fishing Site

State

Big Bass Lake

Public Fishing Site

State

Lower Chub Lake

Public Fishing Site and
Campground

State

Riding and
Hiking Trail

Approximately nine mile trail
of hiking, riding and crosscountry skiing

State

Pigeon River
Forest Campgrounds

campsites in densely wooded
scenic area, fishing

State

Pickerel Lake

Trout, bass and panfishing;
camping, swimming, trout
fishing, camping, picnic tables

State

Pigeon Bridge
Forest Campgrounds

Trout fishing, camping picnic
tables

State

Public Fishing
Sites

on the sturgeon River at
Vanderbilt Road and the
Sturgeon Valley Road and other
locations; on the Black River
near Black River Road

State

Riding and
Hiking Trails

CHARLTON TOWNSHIP

CHESTER TOWNSHIP

CORWITH TOWNSHIP

31

�. J

Round Lake

campground and fishing area;
swimming

state

Pigeon River
State Forest

Scenic, densely wooded area
with numerous state campgrounds,
lakes, rivers, public fishing
areas; including several miles of
hiking or cross-country ski trails,
has the only elk herd east of the
Mississippi River

State

Ski resort with 12 downhill slopes
and cross-country ski trails;
hotel and lodge accommodations, golf
course currently under construction

Private

DOVER TOWNSHIP
Sylvan Resort

ELMIRA TOWNSHIP

Gaylord Country
Club

Privately owned club with 18 hole
golf course

Private

Elmira Elementary
School

Gymnasium, two softball diamonds,
playground

Gaylord
Community
School

Gaylord Schools'
Plantation

80 forested acres owned by
Gaylord School District,
forestry studies, hiking trails

Gaylord
Community
School

Wilderness Valley

18 hole public golf course;
cross-country skiing

Private

Lake Manuka

Public campground and
fishing sites

State

Public Fishing
Sites

Located on the Manistee Rivers
in the extreme southwest part
of the township

State

Frank H. Wilkinson
Roadside Park

Seven wooded acres with stream;
10 picnic tables located on US 27

State

Five Lakes Study
Area

Owned by the Gaylord School
District; 20 acres with
biological center, hiking trails

Gaylord
Community
Schools

HAYES TOWNSHIP

LIVINGSTON TOWNSHIP

32

�Otsego County
Fairgrounds

Five exhibit barns, race track,
horse barns, mid-way booths,
grandstand

County

Alpine Center

10 kilometers (6.2 miles) of
cross-country skiing

County

Hidden Valley
(Otsego Ski Club)

Membership only - 13 downhill
ski slopes, 8 miles of crosscountry ski trails, 18 hole
public golf course

Private

OTSEGO LAKE TOWNSHIP

Michaywe' Hills
Golf Course

Located partially in Bagley Twp.

Otsego Lake
State Park

62 acre park with 203 campsites,
1000' sand beach, boat access

State

Arbutus Beach

Private (residents) beach on
Otsego Lake

Private

Hear Lake

Public Fishing Site

State

Big Bradford
Lake

New camping sites presently
under construction
Public Fishing Site

Private
State

Lake Marjory

camping, public fishing site

State

Riding and Hiking
Trail

Approximately 8.5 miles of
state-owned trail for riding,
hiking and cross-country skiing

State

Edna Schotte
Memorial Park

Pavilion, picnic tables,
playground, hiking trails,
restrooms, grills, fountain

~

.

.

Private

Township

VILLAGE OF VANDERBILT
Vanderbilt
Memorial Park

Two tennis courts, playground
equipment, six picnic tables

Village

Vanderbilt
School

Indoor basketball court,
baseball diamond, football
field, hiking trails, forestry
study area, picnic area.

Vanderbilt
Schools

33

�CITY OF GAYLORD
(See Figure 8)
1

Alten Zimmer

Senior Citizens meeting place, square
dancing, recreational activities,
Housing units - subsidized

2

Aspen Park

Natural area, three picnic tables,
two tennis courts, hiking, crosscountry ski trails, wildlife pond

City

3

Freel Park

Picnic tables, grills and pavilion

City

4

Gaylord
Bowling Center

Bowling, three softball diamonds,
horseshoes

Private

5

Gaylord
Community
Center Area

6

Gaylord High
School

Basketball court (indoor);
baseball diamond, football
field, track

7

George Dumas
Park

Playground equipment, eight
picnic tables

City

8

Hale Park

Picnic tables and benches

City

9

Hockey Arena

Outdoor ice rink for hockey,
maintained by Hockey Association

City &amp;
Private

10

Monseigneur
Kaminski Park

Little League Field - St. Mary's

Private

11

North Ohio
Elementary

Playground, gymnasium, two
softball diamonds

12

Otsego
Health Club

Membership only, six racketball
courts, weightlifting, exercise
courses, racquetball, walleyball,
pool, two tennis courts

13

South Maple
Elementary

Playground and gymnasium

14

st. Mary's
School

Indoor basketball court,
baseball diamond, football
field, playground equipment

15

City Property

Numerous Soccer Fields

Indoor and outdoor facilities;
tennis, skating rink, pool tables,
ping-pong, etc.

34

Ot. County
Council on
Aging

City Of Gaylord
&amp; Otsego County
Gaylord
Community
Schools

Gaylord Comm.
Schools
Private

Gaylord
Community
Schools
Private

Gaylord Soccer Assoc.

�CITY RECREATIONAL PARKS ANO FACILITIES:

The City of Gaylord has four (4) parks within the City
limits; Aspen Park, Ooumas Park, Freel Park and Hale Park. The
City also has the land area surrounding Otsego County Community
Center and property located near Fairview Cemetery. With the
exception of Aspen Park, which contains 58.22 acres, the
remaining City parks range in size from less than a regulation
City lot to several City lots. The smallest of the parks is
Hale Park, located along Business Loop 27, consisting of some
trees, a picnic area and park benches. This park is viewed
mostly for it's ascetics value. Ooumas Park, ldcated at the
intersection of Fourth Street and South Maple Street, is used by
a large number of residents of the City, County and tourist
alike. This park provides picnic tables, playground equipment,
and is moderately wooded. Freel park, located between Huron and
Mitchell Street, is an open area providing both picnic areas and
additional playground equipment. With the recent addition of
the new playground equipment located at Freel Park, use has been
increased significantly. Aspen park, consisting of 58.22 acres,
is the most recent addition to the City Park system. As a
contingent upon purchase of the property for this park, the City
had to install two (2) tennis courts and name the park "Aspen
Park". This 100 acres was initially purchased in 1986 for two
reasons. These being the natural beauty of the area and the
City wastewater fac i lity needing an additional 30 acres as a
spare drain field.
In 1987, the City did install the two
required tennis courts to meet the deed restriction on the
property. In 1988, the City Planning Commission was given the
task of devising a Recreational Plan for the park. After much
discussion and study, the Planning Commission asked and received
help from the Soil Conservation Staff located at the Alpine
Center and Gaylord Public School System. Initially, the Soil
Conservation Staff did a complete inventory of the trees and
other physical characteristics of the park and provided a
significant findings of fact to the City Planning Commission.
Many of the items in the city Recreation Plan have been further
developed from this Soil Conservation study. It has been agreed
upon by the City Planning Commission and the Gaylord City
Council to keep the park as natural as possible. During the
summer of 1989, the Michigan Youth Corp was employed by the Soil
Conservation District to establish new walkways, clean up old
fencing and provide other work as dictated by the Soil
Conservation Staff.

35

�The Community Center land area, owned by the City, consists
of some very minor playground equipment, two tennis courts that
were constructed several years ago, and an outdoor basketball
court. This area is used during the winter for a skating rink
area. There is also a shuffle board located on the Community
Center property that has not been utilized in the past several
years. The Otsego County Community Center located on this
parcel of property has been recently renovated by County-wide
tax milage voted for this purpose.
Included within this
facility is a new indoor basketball court, ping-pong and other
games as such.
The area located across from Fairview Cemetery and directly
north of the North Ohio School has been utilized for several
recreational needs in the past. The current use includes an
unsheltered hockey arena operated by the Otsego County Hockey
Association. The area has also been used for BMX bikes,
baseball and soccer.

36

�RECREATION PROGRAMS
PROGRAM SPONSORS

PROGRAM NAME

Adult Education

Gaylord Community
Schools

Alpenfest

Chamber of Commerce

Bingo

Elks, Eagles, Knights
of Columbus,
st. Mary's Cathedral

Boating Safety

Sheriff's Dept.

Church Slow Pitch Softball

Church League ~ssoc.
&amp; Parks &amp; Recreation

Community Band
Community Education

Gaylord Community
Schools

Cross Country Ski Lessons

Wilderness Valley

Down-Hill Ski Lessons

Sylvan Resort and
Michaywe

Historical Society
4-H Program

Cooperative Extension

Horse Programs

4-H

Hunter Safety

Sheriff's Dept. &amp;
Sportsman Club

July 4th Festivities

Johannesburg,
Vanderbilt, Otsego
Lake Association

Little League Baseball,
Senior Div. League Minors League

Little League
Organization

Mark Mellon Memorial Triathlon - Summer

Alpine Striders

Medallion Snowmobile Marathon
(Winterfest)

Chamber of Commerce

Model Airplane Program

Unsponsored

Oktoberfest

Chamber of Commerce

37

�Otsego Health Club:
Aerobics, swimming, gymnastics,
Jr. Racketball program, Racketball
League, Wallyball Leagues

Private

Otsego Lake Fishing Contest

Northland Sportman's
Club

Senior Citizens

Council of Aging

Slow Pitch Softball

Slow Pitch Assoc. &amp;
Parks &amp; Recreation

Soccer

Alpine Youth Soccer
Association

Square Dancing

Council of Aging

Starker-Mann Biathlon

Chamber of Commerce

swimming Classes

Red Cross

Winterfest

Chamber of Commerce

Ice Skating Lessons

City of Gaylord

38

�CITY COUNCIL
Ernest Grocock, Mayor
Patrick Mankowski
William E. Thall
Luke E. Noss
Eugene Niedzwiecki
Scott Dunn
Tom Nelson

-·

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
Sandra (Toni) Brown, Chairperson
Gerald Campbell
Norm Brecheisen
Kellie Galer
Leona (Sam) Titus
Maude Gilmore
Douglas Squires
Steve Swan
Terra Deming

39

�III.

ADMINISTRATION

The City of Gaylord is organized under the "Council Manager
Plan". Both operating and staff departments are under the
control and direction of an appointed manager. The City Manager
is ultimately responsible for ensuring recreation policy of the
City Council is carried out.
The City Planning Commission serves in an advisory capacity '
to the City Council. The function of the Planning Commission
includes, but is not limited to, all of the following functions:
Planning - to provide a systematic means of planning the
location, acquisition, development, and maintenance of a system
of parks, recreation and ·open space areas, facilities and
activities within the City. Definite criteria for inclusion
shall be adopted and revised periodically to keep pace with
changing demands and habit use patterns.
Development - to provide those activities and facilities
commensurate with the needs of the people. All development
should be carefully planned and be of a durable nature to
minimize maintenance.
Funding - to explore and utilize every means of financing that
is available to the Commission including federal and state
matching fund programs, general obl.i gation bonds, general funds,
fees and charges, if justified, and gifts and donations.
General Administration - to employ qualified and competent
personnel to achieve the above functions of the park systems,
and to maintain and establish the necessary procedures for
maintaining an accurate accounting of all funds utilized by the
Commission.
The City Manager recommends and the City Council approves
the annual budget for the Parks and Recreation Department. The
current budget for 1990-1991 is provided following this section.
Operation - to provide the necessary personnel to operate the
parks as effectively and efficiently as feasible. Adequate
supervision should be provided at all areas to protect the
facilities and to insure the equal opportunity for enjoyment of
all users.
Maintenance - all parks and facilities will be maintained in a
clean, neat, sanitary and orderly manner, to protect the public
health, safety and enjoyment of its users.

40

�Programming of the facilities is handled through the annual
operating budget which groups the Recreation Department as a
"General Fund" item. An important distinction to be made is
that the Parks ~nd Recreation Department function is not
confined to a user-charge, self sustaining mode, but are
provided on a City wide basis, and to outside residents at no
charge.
The City of Gaylord is the only City in Otsego County.
Serving as the County seat it is essential the City and County
work in close harmony. The County employs a full-time
recreation director. The careful utilization of funds dictate
this director utilize both City and County facilities.
This
arrangement has worked very well and will continue as long as
this utilization is succesful.
The Planning Commission makes their recommendations for
recreation planning directly to the City Council. The Planning
Commission initiates input from the citizens of Gaylord whether
it be through formal public hearings, notice through the local
media, which generates informal input, and task groups
consisting of planning members, school officials, soil
conservation experts and Gaylord citizens.
Through formal approval the City Council adopts recommendations
of the Planning Commission for recreational policy. By adopting
the annual budget the City Council approves the administration
of the recreation plan. To approve the annual budget a public
hearing must be held which allows citizens an additional
opportunity for input of recreation administration and policy.
The City Manager is responsible for the parks and recreation
administration once the annual budget is adopted. All
operations and maintenance must be carried out as the adopted
budget dictates. The public works foreman coordinates City
Public Works employees and volunteer efforts to ensure all
maintenance in the park system is completed systematically.
Part-time employees are hired for specific needs such as the ice
skating program and supplemental maintenance as dictated by the
City Manager.

METHODS OF MAINTENANCE AND RECREATION BUDGET
All maintenance and capital expenditures are funded by City
General Tax money. The budget is allocated from the operating
levy of the City of Gaylord annually. The amount of the annual
City Budget for parks and recreation varies depending on
projected capital purchases, such as land or new playground
equipment. Other funding sources are service clubs and private
donations from the area.
41

�CITY OF GAYLORD RECREATION PLANNING PROCESS AND ADMINISTRATIVE STRUCT~E

Voting Ctt lzens

I
I

-'-

Mayor
City Council Members

~

I
I

_I_
Annual Budget

I

I

--------------'---------------I
I
I

I
_,_

_I_

City of Gaylord Planning/
Park Recreation Conmission

+'
r-'
Ul

City Manager/
Director of Parks and Recreation

I
I

-'-

Park Factl lty/
Maintenance

I
I
_,_

t-tj

H

::u

M

w

.

Public Works Department

C)

c-:

Volunteers

I
I

________ ,________
I
I

I
I

Ful 1 Ttme Staff

Part Tlme Staff

-'-

-'-

�PARKS

&amp;

RECREATION BUDGET

89-90

BUDGET

90-91

90-91

REQUESTED

APPROVED

EXPENDITURES
Salaries &amp; Wages
Fringe Benefits

$

5,000
0

$

5,500
2,200

$

5,500
2,200

Supplies

2,000

2,200

2,200

Materials

3,000

3,000

8,000

Contractual Services

1,000

5,000

0

0
0

0
1,000

0
1,000

Electric

200

200

200

Heat

100

0

0

4,000

4,000

4,000

0

0

0

Telephone Expense
Contractual Service

Equipment Rental
Land Purchase

TOTAL

$15,300

$ 22,100

$ 22,100

REVENUES
General Fund

$ 22.100

42

�IV.

DEFICIENCIES AND NEEDS

• conducted in January 1984 by the City of Gaylord
A survey was
and asked several questions pertaining to recreation as part of a
much longer survey. The 1984 City survey (January 1984) was
delivered to each household in the City of Gaylord.
It offered
residents an opportunity to "vote" on their preference as to several
options of recreational activities or to write in other recreational
facilities/activities that they preferred. As obtained from the
results, residents of Gaylord were mostly in favor of bicycle paths,
a city-owned swimming pool and an activity center for teenagers and
young adults. By contrast, residents also indicated that they were
most opposed to additional baseball diamonds and a city-owned
swimming pool.
Residents were also given the opportunity to write in a
recreational activity of their choice that they think the City ought
to provide. Although there was a wide range of answers, the most
common answers were for an ice skating rink and for tennis courts.
Some people were in favor of tennis courts in summer that could be
converted to an ice skating rink in winter.
The survey of 1984 conducted by the City of Gaylord had several
questions dealing with recreation. The preference for an activity
center, a city-owned swimming pool (the survey did not specify indoor
or outdoor), and bicycle paths were indicated to also be used for
hiking and cross-country skiing. Residents were most opposed to
additional baseball diamonds and lighting of a second baseball
diamond. Secondly, residents were opposed to a city-owned swimming
pool. Thus, residents are divided on the issue of a swimming pool
owned by the city.

43

�V. LONG RANGE GOALS

The role of the city of Gaylord is to acquire, develop and
maintain parks, recreation areas and open spaces.
In addition, Gaylord should plan and coordinate local
neighborhood and community facilities with cooperation of the County
and Schools. Cooperation with the state and federal planring and
coordinative activities is a necessity.
Coordination with the Gaylord Community Schools has included
adoption of a park-school concept of a park site adjacent to the
schools. Furthermore, Gaylord shall encourage ciose coordination
with local and county intermediate school districts responsible for
special education programs to extend their programs to include
leisure non-school activities and facilities for handicapped students
and their families.
The responsibility of administering the City Parks and
Recreation Program shall be that of the City administration. The
Planning Commission shall keep the City Council informed of its
programs, policies, procedures and objectives.

In addition, the goals of the City are:
- To provide recreational facilities that are accessible
to all residents.
- To provide recreation sites which will accommodate a
variety of activities for diverse interests as well as
diverse incomes.
- To provide park sites which will accommodate daily use.
- To provide a large enough facility so that residents
and tourists alike can be accommodated.
- To maintain communication between the Planning
Commission and the city Council.
- To maintain orderly economic/industrial growth so that
it is not detrimental to the natural environment of
the City and surrounding townships.

44

�I.
I

i.

I

44a

FIGURE 3

�VI.

SHORT TERM OBJECTIVES
Five Year Plan
ASPEN PARK

1991

Asphalt road to eliminate severe erosion
problems and provide easier access to
picnic areas.

$25,000
(2,000 Local)
(23,000 Grants)

1990

Erosion control and landscaping provided
around newly constructed tennis courts.

$5,000
(1,000 Local)
(4,000 Grants)

19901991

Walkways cleared for foot path only
(especially through hemlock area).

$2,000
(2,000 Local)

PLANTATIONS:
19901991

Establish interpretive area showcasing
managed and unmanaged stands, thin every
third row and prune to 17 feet to illustrate
wise forest management on a few acres, this
project coordinated with local school system.

$2,000
(2,000 Local)

MIXED HARDWOOD STANDS:
19911992

Trees, shrubs and groundcovers identified
along trails. Highlight signs of wildlife
(beaver cuts, wildlife dens, woodpecker
holes, etc.)

$1,000
(1,000 Local)

OPEN FIELDS:
19901991

Encourage deer and small animals by creating
food plots or mowing grass once per year. At
northeast opening, plant windbreak of shrubs
and conifers for cover.

$1,000
(1,000 Local)

1990

Prune trees in existing pathways to accommodate
bicycle paths, cross-country skiing and
hiking trails.

$16,000
$1,000 Local)
$15,000 Grants)

1993

Improve parking area for picnic area and tennis
area.

$2,000
(2,000 Local)

1990

Erect gates to limit access.

$2,000
(2,000 Local)

45

�-----

\

- · - PtitYK Bo1,n1olr~

--fwo1r'1cK ~M
--#ik.i~ 1rttil

45a

L _____.: .;

FIGURE 4

�1992

Construct erosion control barriers on
two-track going through plantation down
to pond area.

$1,250
(1,250 Local}

1990

Signs installed notating park name and park
rules.

$1,500
(1,500 Local)

1990

Mark all corner survey points to better
illustrate property boundary lines.

19901995

Purchase property to boundary line to include
all of Scott's pond and along boundary to
further preserve natural beauty of the area.. -.

Donation
$300,000
(225,000 Grants)
(75,000 Local)

DOUMAS PARK

1992

Additional picnic tables.
(Utilizing recycled plastic)

$2,000
(500 Local)
(1,000 Grants)
(500 Donations)

19901991

Landscape new playground equipment.

$500
(500 Local)

19901991

Reseed grass.

$250
(250 Local)

19901995

Purchase additional playground equipment.
(Toddler)

$12,000
(2,000 Local}
(10,000 Grants)

1991

Replace drinking fountain.

$450
(450 Local)

19941995

Pave parking lot.
(Correct erosion problem)

$10.000
(2,000 Local)
(8,000 Grants)

46

��FREEL PARK
19921993

Purchase more playground equipment to be
placed at south end of the park.
(Toddler)

$15,000
(2,000 Local)
(13,000 Grants)

19901995

Continue to landscape entire area.

$2,500
(2,500 Local)

1992

Additional picnic tables.
(Utilizing recycled plastic)

$2,000
(500 Local)
(1,000 Grants)
(500 Donations)

HALE PARK
19911992

Replace park benches and picnic tables using
table and benches manufactured from recycled
products.

$3,000
(3,000 Local)

1991

Continue to landscape.

$750
(750 Local)

1992

Drinking fountain.

$500
(500 Local)

47

�fral ~vk.

�47b

�The staff would like to extend our "thanks" to the following for
their help in compiling the Recreation Plan.

citizens of Gaylord
City Council
City Planning Commission
Gaylord Community Schools
Michigan Employment Security Commission
Northeast Michigan Council of Governments
Otsego County Parks and Recreation
Otsego County Planning Commission
Otsego County Soil Conservation District

48

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008359">
                <text>Gaylord_Recreation-Plan_1990</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008360">
                <text>City of Gaylord Planning Commission, City of Gaylord, Otsego County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008361">
                <text>1990-06-14</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008362">
                <text>City of Gaylord 1990/1995 Recreation Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008363">
                <text>The City of Gaylord 1990/1995 Recreation Plan was prepared by the City of Gaylord Planning Commission and was adopted on June 14, 1990.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008364">
                <text>Recreation--planning</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008365">
                <text>Gaylord (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008366">
                <text>Otsego County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008367">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008369">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008370">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008371">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008372">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038329">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54703" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58974">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/3ca509aa34c346ed3643352542032e8b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b1e120f3f361ac2f32e34ed672f93a71</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008358">
                    <text>-

�I
II
I

I
I
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

A Preliminary Report Upon
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Gaylord, Michigan

Prepared for the
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AND THE CITY COUNCIL

The preparation of this report was financially aided
through a Federal Grant from the Urban Renewal Administration of the Housing and Home Finance Agency under
the Urban Planning Assistance Program authorized by
Section 701 of the Housing Act of 1954, ~s amended,
administered by the Michigan Department of Economic
Expansion.

By

Harland Bartholomew and Associates
Planners, Engineers and Landscape Architects
Saint Louis, Missouri

September, 1965

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

HARLAND BARTHOLOMEW AND ASSOCIATES
PLANNERS. ENGINEERS· LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS
1030 PIERCE BUILDING
Ill NORTH FOURTH STREET

SAINT LOUIS 2. MISSOURI
CAa.Pl!LD

1·1107

CAILE

ADDl!S! ,

HAR.PLAN

September, 1965
City Planning Commission
Gaylord, Michigan
Gentlemen:
We are pleased to submit the following Preliminary
Report on the Comprehensive Plan for the City of Gaylord.
As this is a preliminary report, it should be carefully
reviewed by the Commission, the City Council and other
city officials.
The report includes a review of existing conditions
for all planning phases and sets forth preliminary plans
and projections for the economy, population, land use,
thoroughfares, business district and community facilities.
Regulatory measures are discussed in this report and the
recommended text for zoning and subdivision regulations
are contained as appendices. The utilities studies and
capital improvement program will be presented in a separate report following review of the plans in this report.

We wish to gratefully acknowledge the cooperation and
assistance we have received during the preparation of this
report.
Respectfully submitted,

::;;;;:~~J:::1
Malcolm C. Drummond
Associate Partner

ST. LOUIS

ATLANTA

MEMPHIS

'-..._,_

WASHINGTON

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I

•~

TABLE OF CONTENTS

INTRODUCTION.

. 1

• • . . . . • • • • .

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COMMUNITY • •
Historical Background.
. . .
Geographic Location.
.
Economic Background.
.

.

..

LAND USE PLAN . •
Existing Land Use Pattern
Dwelling Unit Distribution • •
Future Land Use Needs
••
Land Use Plan • . • •
• •

.
.

. . . . . .
. . .. . .
.. .. .. .. ..
.
.

.
.

.
.

.

•
.
•
.

•
•
•
•

•

.
.

. 11
. 11

. . . .

. 15

.
.

. . . . .

• • • .
• • . . .• .

THOROUGHFARE PLAN.
. . . . .
Present Street System
•• . . .
Traffic Patterns • • • • . • •
.
Proposed Thoroughfare Plan • . • • •

.
.
.
•

.
.
.

.
.
.
•

.

.

. . .
.
.. . .
• •

3
3
5
5

• . 15
. . 16
.
.
.

. 21
. 21
. 23
• 24

THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT •
• • • . ,.. •
. 27
Land Use Pattern • . • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • 27
Street Pattern . • • • • . • • • • • • • • • . • • 28
Parking Facilities • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 29
Development Plan for the Business District,
.33

• • 37
.37
.40

COMMUNITY FACILITIES . • • • • • • • . •
Existing Community Facilities
Community Facilities Plan • • • •
REGULATORY MEASURES .

• • • • • • • • • •
• • • • 45
Zoning Regulations. . • • • •
• . • • . • • 45
Subdivision Regulations . • • • • • • • • • • • . 50

PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION . •

Administration of the Plan • • • •
Immediate Objectives for Planning
City Council Program . • • • . . .
Public Understanding and Support.

• • .. .
. . . .

.
.

• • . 53
. . . 53

Implementation.54
• • • • . • . . 55
• • • • • • • • 56

APPENDIX A - PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE
APPENDIX B - PROPOSED SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

INDEX TO PLATES
Plate
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Land Use - 1965. . . • . • • . • • • • . . . • •
Distribution of Dwelling Units - 1965 and 1985
Land Use Plan - 1985 . . • •
• • • • •
Zoning District Map. • • • • . . . • • •
. •
Traffic Flow - 1965. . . • • • •
• • • •
Major Street Plan . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
General Standards for Major Thoroughfares • • • •
Business District Plan . • • . • • • • • .
•
Community Facilities Plan. . • • • • • • •
•

11
15
16
48
23
25
25
33
40

INDEX TO TABLES
Table
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Economic Characteristics • • • • • • . . • • • •
Population Trends and Projections. •
. • • •
Existing Land Use in Gaylord.
• •••••.
Land Use and Population Ratios.
• •••••
Future Land Use Requirements. • • • •
• •
Existing Major Street Data • . • • • • • • • • •
Percentage of Vehicles Parking by Time Periods.
Existing and Proposed Community Facilities . . •

4
8
12
14
19
22
30
43

�II

I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

INTRODUCTION
Gaylord is a growing .· community in the center of a rapidly
developing area.
Increased trade ·activity and industrial development. are expected to accompany this growth.
The present
population of 2,600 persons is expected to increase to nearly
5,000 persons of permanent population by 1985. The Comprehensive Plan contemplates consi-derable development in the surrounding areas represented by continuous development .of summer
homes, resorts and recreational facilities.
The Comprehensive Plan is designed to guide this growth
in Gaylord during the next 20 years. The major purpose of the
plan is to fully capitalize on the community's potential.
Gaylord, as the center of a growing tourist area, is advantageously located in relation to major metropolitan centers. The
area possesses resources in access and transportation, in industrial sites, and in a well-established residential and commercial center. The area should be able to successfully compete
with other communities in other counties for these developments.
If the community develops without proper planning and services,
the haphazard result could gradually discourage new growth. On
the other hand, a well-designed and efficient community can
assure a promising future and attract new growth.
Satisfactory living and working conditions in Gaylord are
essential to its growth if it is to achieve its potential as a
city of 5,000 in the center of a growing area. These optimum
conditions cannot be obtained by providing public improvements
to the expediency of the moment or by allowing all private development to take place at the whim of the individual. There
must be a publicly accepted, overall comprehensive plan to coordinate all public improvements and to direct private development. By using the plan as a guide, duplications, waste and
lessened standard developments can be avoided. Gaylord has
had many changes in the past and will continue to change in
the future. The plan should serve as a guide for these inevitable modifications to direct the building of new homes, new
plants, new businesses, and expanding community facilities.
The plan calls for the development of an improved central
business district, a large highway-oriented commercial area,
an industrial complex along the Interstate Highway, new residential areas to the north and southeast, a new elementary
school, several park areas, and a new city-county building,
all coordinated for the development of a modern community.
The Comprehensive Plan for Gaylord is primarily concerned
with physical improvements, public facilities in the form of

�-

2 -

streets, highways, airport facilities, parking lots, public
buildings, schools, parks, sanitary and storm sewers, water
lines and private developments . such as the use of land, construction of buildings, division of land and the appearance
and maintenance of property. Public improvements are directed
by a thoroughfare plan, a community facilities plan, and the
like. Private improvements are controlled by zoning, subdivision,building, and other regulatory ordinances and by .the land
use plan.
These plans and regulations are the basic components
of the Comprehensive Plan.

�•
•I
'I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

-

3 -

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COMMUNITY
Historical ~ackgr6und
Gaylord was organized as a village in 1881 and incorporated as a city in 1921. Gaylord has always been progressive in the provision of public services, as evidenced by its
development of a public water distribution system almost from
the very start. The courthouse was built in 1891, the first
electricity arrived in 1897, the first streets were paved in
1921, and the sewer system was started in 1933. The only bank
in Otsego County was founded in Gaylord in 1893.
The first railroad line from the south reached Otsego
Lake Village in May, 1873, and Gaylord in July, 1873.
With
the advent of the railroad, the lumbering activity greatly increased since it was possible to transport much greater quantities of lumber.
The pine lumbering activity soon reached
its peak and then was nearly depleted by 1890. The first industry, other than saw mills, to come to Gaylord was the Detroit
Iron and Furnace Company. This company built two charcoal kilns
north of Gaylord sometime prior to 1890, however, they ceased
production in 1896. The Dayton Last Block Works was started in
1891. This industry used maple lumber for ten pins and blocks
and was a major industry for a number of years, employing about
30 people. The company went out of business about 1931. The
Jackson and Wylie Company of Sagin~w, a . hoop and stay mill, was
also started about 1890 and continued in business until about
1915.
In 1905, an east-west railroad from Boyne City to Alpena
with a daily total of four passenger trains, in addition to the
freight trains, came to Gaylord. During the period from 1910
to 1915, there were 14 passenger trains stopping at Gaylord
each day.
Industry was also active in the period shortly after the
turn of the century. The Gaylord Manufacturing Company, specialists in the manufacture of wagons and logging sleighs,
operated from approximately 1900 to 1915 and reached its peak
about 1908. An automobile factory manufacturing the "Gaylord
3~' started about 1910, but was in business only for a few
years.
The Saginaw Wood Products Company operated from about
1915 to 1922. The 1930's saw little development in the area;
however, in 1941 both the Higgins Industry, Incorporated and
the Hidden Valley Ski Club came to Gaylord.
In 1945, the
Standard Products Company located in Gaylord and the O. W.
Rowley Company was established in the area.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

4 -

Table 1
ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
Gaylord, Michigan

Retail Trade -

1963 - Gaylord

Establishments • • • • • • • • • • • 76 (62 with payroll)
Retail Sales~ • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • $10,587,000
Payroll • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • $1,041,000
Selected Services -

1963 - Gaylord _

Establishments • • • • • • • • • • • 46 (22 with payroll)
• • • • • • • • • • • $819,000
Sales • • • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • $164,000
Payroll • • • • • • • •
Wholesale Trade - 1963 - Otsego County
Establishments. • • • •
• • • . • • • • • -. -• • • • 23
Sales •
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • $9,600,000
Payro 11 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •. • . $412, 000
Manufacturing - 1958 - . Otsego County
Establishments • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Value Added by Manufacturing • • • •

.. .. •.

. . . . 18
$3,548,000

Agriculture - 1959 - Otsego County
Land in Farms • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 69,000 acres
Number of Farms • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 288
Total Value of Farm Products Sold • • • • • • • $643,000
Employment - 1960 - Otsego County
Agriculture, Forestry •
• . . . . . . .. . . . . . . 212
Construction. .• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .184
Manufacturing • • • • •. • • • • • • • • • -• • • • • • 579
Transportation, Communications and Utilities • • • • • 75
Wholesale and Retail Trade. • • • • • • • • • .• • • • 479
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate • • • • • • • • • 59
· Public Administration • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 156
Business Services and Miscellaneous • • • • • • • ~, .676
2,420
Source:

U. S. Census, 1958, 1959 and 1963

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I

r

GAYLO~D

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

u.s.

INDl,.NA

GE

·r~~N

E-

GKA HIC

CITY PLANN ING COMMISS1or..;
GAY LOi.D.
MICH IG A t,J
TH( Pll•AlA10N Qr 11-1!1 MM WA~ IINMIC l-"lLY
AJ0(0 lHlOUGH A rtO!l"l GlANl f l OM lH(

or

Uk&amp;AN llN[WAL A0MINlillATION
lli. ~ ING ANO HOM( /INANC( AG(N(l , UNOll IH( Ul·
IAN JLANNJ,..G A~\l~lAN(t PlQGlAM ,\UlHOl·
IHD IY !MCHQN 701 Of lM( HOU)ING &gt;(1 Of
19~4. A~ AMlNOlO

HARLAND

BAlTHOLOMEW AND AIIOCIAT!S

Cl1Y HAHNllt CIVIL INGIN!!l\, LAN05CM [ AlCH tlE CH
SAI NT lOUIS,
HP1 1,;01
MIHO U ll

�I

'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

5 -

In recent years, Gaylord has gained distinction as a
year~round tourist and resort center.
Ski resorts operate
in the winter; bunting and fishing facilities are available
throughout the year.
The development of summer homes and
resorts on the many nearby lakes has grown steadily.
Geographic Location
Gaylord is strategically located in the northern part on
Michigan's lower peninsula on Interstate Highway 75, the main
north-south highway in the state, and on Michigan Highway 32,
an important east-west road. Gaylord is within or close to a
70 mile radius of a large part of Michigan's tourist area, including Traverse City, Mackinaw City, Alpena and Houghton Lake.
The larger cities of Grand Rapids, Lansing and Flint are within a 150 mile radius, and the major metropolitan areas of
Detroit and Chicago are within a general proximity of 250
miles.
In addition, improved transportation facilities have
placed Gaylord and Otsego County in a favorable location to
attract tourists from such metropolitan centers as Toledo,
Indianapolis, Cincinnati and Louisville.
Because of the area's central location in the northern
part of the lower peninsula, and because of the lack of large
cities in the area, Gaylord serves as a regional trading center for a relatively large area. Because of its favorable
position on a good transportation artery, the Interstate Highway, Gaylord and Otsego County are able to attract tourists
and economically transport manufactured products.
Economic Background
An analysis of the present economy of Otsego County and
a study of future economic development has been developed as
a part of the county plan. This study is contained in a report entitled, ''Background for Planning" and essentially include~ an economic study of Gaylord. The following section
summarizes the economic background for Gaylord and the area.
Some of the economic characteristics of Gaylord or Otsego
County are shown in Table 1.
Trading enterprises in Otsego County employ nearly 25
percent of the labor force; most of this employment is located
within or close to the City of Gaylord. Boasting a total of
76 retail establishments realizing annual sales in excess of
$10,000,000, Gaylord serves as the trading center for Otsego
County and areas in adjoining counties. The Gaylord regional
trade center is in competition with such cities as Traverse
City, East Jordan, Boyne City, Petoskey, Alpena and Grayling.

�- 6 -

Since the area around Gaylord is recognized as a tourist
center selected serv{~es are a vital part of the city's economic base. There were . 46 service establishments in the City
of Gaylord in 1963 with annual sales in excess of $800,000.
Gaylord also serves as a sub-wholesale trade center with 23
establishments realizing nearly $10,000,000 annually in wholesale sales.
Although there has been a decrease in the number of farms
and land utilized -in farms in recent years, agricultural activities are still an important part of the local economic
base, as evidenced by a 1959 total of 288 farms within Otsego
County earning $643,000 in farm products sold.
In 1958, the value added by manufacturing through Otsego
County local industries was $3.5 million. The five major manufactu~ing companies in the County - Standard Products, Higgins
Industry, .0. w. Rowley Company, _a nd Gaylord Tool and Gauge have recently been joined by the U. s. Plywood Corporation~
which employs about 200 persons. By comparing this situation
with the earlier one described under Historical Background,
the emergence of a much healthier distribution of manufacturing establishments is apparent.
From a low base in 1940, employment in manufacturipg in
Gaylord ' increased by 300 persons to 1950 and increased ari
additional 200 persons to 1960. Th.i s is attributable in part
to greater manufacturing activity; but probably an . equally
important factor has been the growing tourist trade. : While
employment decreases in agriculture and the extractive industries have nearly equalled employment increases in manufacturing, there has been an overall employment increase of just over
50 percent in the 20-year period.
The future economy of the Gaylord area will generally be
an outgrowth of the existing base of the city and the county.
Industrial employment will probably continue to increase in
importance to the economic base. The county area is still
relatively undeveloped from the standpoint of tourist activity
and summer home development, but is favorably located so as to
have the opportun-Uy to increase these developments.
If Gaylord and Otsego County are to gain new· industry, it
will be necessary for leaders of the community to actively engage in competing for new industries. The recently formed
Industrial Development Corporation can do a great deal to further future industrial development within the area. Examples
of the types of industries that could advantageously locate in

�Ill

i
i
II
II
i
II
rl

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

-

7 -

the area include operations involving the assembly of relatively small products not requiring high transportation costs,
fabrication of finished products, and wood-using industries.
It is anticipated that all types of tourist activity will
continue to be an important part of the economy and will continue to see growth in the future; however, most of this
growth will probably occur in the development of new summer
homes.
With increases expected in basic employment and tourist activity, there will be a corresponding increase in retail
trade and selective services.
As Gaylord and Otsego County exper1ence growth, there will
be a corresponding need for additional construction.
Some
growth in the construction and building materials industry may
be expected.
Wholesale trade is already at a relatively high
level of activity and probably cannot be expected to experience
much more growth. There is a possibility of tapping a maple
syrup potential. There are also lime deposits and at least
limited deposits of natural gas and oil within the county area.
These resources may bold some potential for future development.
Past population growth trends since 1900 for the City of
Gaylord, Otsego County, . the state, and the nation are shown
in Table 2. Both the state and the nation have had increases
in population in every decade, though the rate of increase was
the lowest during the 1930's because of the economic depression. Otsego County's growth has fluctuated over the years,
but has steadily been increasing since the 1930's. The City
of Gaylord has had a steady increase in population also since
1930, and the population bas increased from some 1,600 to
2,600 persons during this period of time.
Projections of future population were prepared as a part
of the Otsego Comprehensive Planning Program and are contained
in a report on "Background for Planning". The population of
Otsego County was projected as a relationship to projections
of United States population and State of Michigan population.
Projections for the populations for both the state and the
nation are also shown in Table 2. Based upon several estimates, the County Comprehensive Plan indicates a 1985 population in the county of some 11,000 persons of permanent population.
It is also expected that there will be a seasonal
population of 17,400 persons, thus making 28,400 persons the
total year-around equivalent population of the county.
As a part of these county projections, projections were
made for the population for the City of Gaylord.
It is expected that by 1985 the total population of the city will be

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-:- 8 Table 2
POPULATION TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS
Gaylord, Michigan

City of
Gaylord

Gaylord
Urban Area

United
States
(1,000)

1900

75,995

2,421

6,175

1,561

1910

92,228

2,810

6,552

1,538

1920

106,022

3,668

6,043

1,701

1930

123,202

4,842

5,554

1,627

1940

132,165

5,256

5,827

2,055

1950

151,326

6,372

6,435

2,271

1960

179,323

7,823

7,545

2,568

2,960

1970

214,000 (1) 10,000 (2)

9,000 (3)

3,060

3,650

1980

260,000 (1) 12,500 (2) 10,400 (3)

3,540

4,340

1985

282,000 (1) 14,000 (2) 11,000 (3)

3,740

4,680

(1)
(2)
(3)

· State of
Michigan
(1,000)

Otsego
County

Year

Projections by Bureau of Census, Series II Projections.
Interpolation from ORRRC Judgment Projections.
Estimated by Harland Bartholomew and Associates in
"Background for Planning", Otsego County, Michigan.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

�'I
'
'I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 9 -

3,740 persons residing in 1,068 dwelling units (based upon a
population of 3.5 persons per dwelling unit).
Within the urbanized or planning area of Gaylord (that is, the area bounded
by Congdon, East, McCoy and Murner Roads), there are an additional 592 new dwelling units shown in the distribution of
population plan. Thus, there would be a total of 1,336 dwelling units within the Gaylord planning area by 1985. This results in a projected population of 4,700 persons for the Gaylo r d
urban area by 1985.

�I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

L_ _ __ _ _ _

~~ !
r--

LAND

USE

'Y'•

- 19~5

~

RESIDENTIAL

•
C3

C.OMMERCl~L SEMI - PUBLIC
PUBLIC AN
ND RAILROADS
INDUSTRIAL A

~

I

PLATE

1

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

11 -

LAND USE PLAN
The physical form of a community is the result of the
actions of many individuals and agencies. The buildings and
structures created by private enterprise require supporting
public facilities such as streets, utilities, parks and
schools. The manner in which these public and private improvements are related to one .another largely determines the
character of the community. Proper planning bf these relationships results in an orderly, attractive community.
A survey of existing land uses in Gaylord was conducted
in March of 1965, in which every parcel of land in the city
and within the surrounding area was field-checked, classified
and mapped. This was essentially an up-dating of the land use
survey made as a part of the Otsego County planning program.
The eight major categories of land use include single, two and
multiple-family residential, commercial, light and heavy industrial, parks, public and semi-public property, and railroad
properties.
Existing Land Use Pattern
A land use map of the City of Gaylord and the surrounding
area is shown on Plate 1. The land use pattern of Gaylord is
one of fairly uniform development, occupying a relatively large
part of the present corporate area. The largest concentration
of development is located east of Hidden Valley Ski Club, north
of the public golf course, and east of Interstate Highway 27.
There is a relatively sparse pattern of urban development within the environs of Gaylord with residential and commercial uses
scattered along the various state and county highways.
Residential uses occupy the greatest amount of developed
land area within Gaylord. Though the residential pattern is
located fairly uniformly around the central business district,
new residential developments have been primarily taking place
to the northeast and north.
Scattered residential uses are
found along the highways leading out of the city, primarily
along Michigan 32 and Old Highway 27. The business district
is located at the crossing of M-32 and U. S. Highway 27, generally in the geographic center of the city. This is the
largest concentration of commercial land uses, but smaller
scattered commercial uses are located along the state and
federal highways. The largest concentration of outlying
commercial uses is found south of the city along Old Highway
27. Following completion of the Interstate Highway, a number
of new commercial uses located to the west end of the community along Main Street near the intersection of M-32 and the
Interstate Highway.

I I

�- 12 Table 3

I

EXISTING LAND USE IN GAYLORD
- Gaylord,:Michigan

Land Use
Classification

Area in
Acres

Single-Family .
Residential

147 .6 ;

Two and Multiple
Family Residential

Percent of Total
Corporate Area
_Compared
Gaylord Cities *
14. 44 ,

Percent of
Developed Area
Compared
Gaylord Cities *

17 .10

29.0

34.08

6.1

.60

2.75

1.2

5.48

Commercial

31.2

3.05

1.58

6.1

3.14

Industrial

23.5

2.29

2.83

4.6

5.65

Railroads

18.8

1.84 '

2~50

3.7

4.99

2.1

.21 ,

2.55

0.4

5.08

,

Parks

'

Public and
Semi-Public

122.5

11.99

6.65

23.8

13.25

Streets

159.1

15.57

14.21

31.2

28.33
100.00

Developed Area

510.9

Vacant Land

511~1

50.01

49.83

1,022.0

100.00

100.00

Total Area

*

•
•
'

100.0

The average of 28 other cities have a
population of less than : 50,000.

�I
I
I
I

I-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

13 -

Industrial land uses form a definite pattern in Gaylord,
being concentrated along the railroad tracks. A number of
industrial uses have located in and around the central business district and are scattered to the southwest side of the
city. Public and semi-public uses occupy a considerable
amount of the area within and around the City of Gaylord. The
Hidden Valley Ski Club forms a large mass on the east side of
the city; the community school, the go~f course, and city
property form a large mass to the south; the sanitarium and
hospital occupy large tracts to the north.
West of the Interstate Highway, the County Airport occupies a large tract which
further impedes future development in that direction.
The present population of Gaylord bas developed a total
of 510 acres for urban purposes within the total corporate area
of 1,022 acres.
The area occupied by existing land uses in
Gaylord is reported in Table 3, along with comparative percentages of total corporate and developed area. These percentages are compared with the average of 28 other central
cities having a population of less than 50,000.
A total of 511 acres of Gaylord's total corporate area
is presently vacant; thus, the city is very similar to the 28
compared cities. Gaylord's present population is using approximately 150 acres for residential purposes, 30 acres for
commercial activities, nearly 50 acres for industry and railroads, 125 acres for public and semi-public and parks, and 160
acres for streets.
Residential land uses occupy nearly 30 percent of Gaylord's
developed area which is somewhat lower than the 34 percent average for the compared cities.
Commercial uses occupy over six
percent of the developed area in Gaylord, which is nearly double
the percent of area devoted to this type of land use in the compared cities.
Industrial and railroad uses are somewhat lower
than the compared cities with eight percent of the developed
area of Gaylord devoted to this purpose compared to over 10 percent of the other cities. The lack of park space in Gaylord is
clearly pointed out in the comparisons made in Table 3. The
city has less than one percent of its developed area devoted to
parks, whereas in the compared cities over five percent of the
developed area is dedicated for park purposes. Public and semipublic uses in Gaylord occupy a considerably larger share of
the developed area.
Streets and alleys occupy a slightly higher
percentage of the developed area than is true of the compared
cities.

�-14 Table 4
LAND USE AND POPULATION RATIOS
Gaylord, Michigan

Land Use
Classification

Vandalia,
Illinois

Jackson,
Missouri

Gaylord,
Michigan

Oconto,
Wisconsin

LeMars,
Iowa

Single-Family
Residential

5.68

6.85

5.09

6.03

8.48

Two and Multiple
Family Residential

0.23

0.49

0.28

0.11

0.23

Commercial

1.12

0.60

0.51

o. 74

0.57

Industrial

0.90

1.90

0.71

1.36

0.89

Railroads

0.72

1.31

0.73

0.53

0.41

Parks

o.os

2.29

1.96

0.61

1.16

Public and
Semi-Public

4.71

2.19

3.36

0.80

0.87

Streets

6.12

7.18

5.53

6. 76 ...

4.08

19.56

22.83

18.17

Total
Developed Area

16.94

16.69

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

•

. I. .
. •• I .
. 1
.

VALLEY

CLUB

.

l·.

le

t~-

N01lTM£1\.N
!,AN ITO II..IUM

f------1 f - -

··· -

7

7

..•
i.

•

I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

HIDDEN

l

• •

OTSEGO

._ LJ

COUNTY

~

Al R.PO R T

•

..ly .-

r===~~•µw;mml];ill~~¥•
I

DISTRIBUTION

e

HA.LA N D I AlTHOLOW f W AN O A !,!,OCIATU

c,, • •, ... 11 111,,
u 1•1lou,,

(IY!l

u,,. nu.

~Ot 19•~

lA•DSCAII

,.,o, ,ucu
,uuouu

CITY PL,.NNlNG COMMISSION
G,.YlOJ.0
MICHIG~N

OF DWELLING

UNITS - 19b5 &amp; 1985
• ONE DOT
UNITS OR
• ONE DOT
UNITS OR

REPRESENTS
FOURTEEN
REPRESENTS
FOURTEEN

FOUR DWELLING
PERSONS, 19b5
FOUR DWELLING
PERSONS, 1985

PLATE

2

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
!
!
!
!
I
I

- 15 Dwelling Unit Distribution
The present distribution of dwelling units within Gaylord
is shown on Plate 2, with one dot equalling four dwelling
units.
This distribution of dwelling units was determined
from the land use survey which counted a total of 744 dwelling
units within the city. The present distribution of dwelling
units is a reflection of the existing land patterns within th~
community.
With the exception of the central area and a few
large public open spaces, the population is fairly uniformly
distributed. This population is concentrated i .n and around
the central part of the total corporate area and, to some extent, is scattered along the major highways leading from the
city.
Future Land Use Needs
Estimates of future land use needs for the community can
be developed from past trends in the relationship between land
use and population.
Acres of land used per 100 persons in
Gaylord is compared with four other cities of similar . size located in the states of Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois and Missouri.
Table 4 shows the definite similarity between Gaylord and the
compared cities in land use and population. These communities
are using approximately five to eight acres per 100 persons
for single-family residential purposes and a very minor amount
of land for two-family and multiple-family residential purposes.
There is a definite similarity in the amount of land per 100
persons used for commercial purposes in the other cities; however, Gaylord is using over one acre per 100 persons, which is
considerably more than the compared communities. A variation
is found in the amount of land used for industrial and railroad purposes, and Gaylord is using less area for these purposes than all of the other communities except one.
It is significant to note that Gaylord is using nearly five acres per
100 persons for public and semi-public uses compared to the
next highest of 3.3 acres per 100 persons. This ratio will
undoubtedly increase in the future. Gaylord is using . an average amount of land per 100 persons for streets and alleys.
The probable future land use needs of Gaylord are based
upon the 1985 estimated population of 4,700 persons. The
present population is using 19.56 acres of land per 100 persons for all types of larid uses. The amount of land needed
for every 100 persons is expected to decrease slightly; however, the land required for various types of uses is expected
to alter significantly. Future land use requirements for
Gaylord are shown in Table 4.

�- 16 The acres used · pe._r_~~lOO .- persqii_~ for .. single-family residential purposes will increase slightly to six acres per 100
persons, recognizing the recent trends toward larger lot
sizes.
With the development of highway commercial activities
in the Gaylord area, it is expected that the amount of land
used per 100 persons - for commercial activities will increase
to approximately 1. 50 acres per 100 persons.
Similarly, industrial needs are expected to increase to approximately two
acres per 100 persons. ·As previously-noted, the amount of
land in Gaylord devoted to park purposes is unusually low.
Based upon national standards, the future needs are estimated
at one acre per 100 persons of population.
As previously
noted, the amount of land in Gaylord devoted to streets and
public rights-of-way is extremely high. This ratio should
decline in the future as new areas are planned and more spacious street develop~e._nts and larger block sizes are developed.
Commercial and industrial land uses are expected to increase
significantly during the next several decades. The inc·r eases
shown in the table reflect a trend toward larger floor · areas
in stores and industrial plants, greater parking requirements,
and increased needs for open storage and expansion.
Based upon these ratios of land use and population, the
future population of 4,700 persons would require a total of
890 acres of land for urban purposes. This would require
nearly 380 acres of vacant land to be absorbed for urban land
uses.
An additional 140 acres would be required for residential purposes, 40 acres for commercial, 75 acres for industrial, nearly 50 acres for park, and only an additional 40
acres for public and semi-public purposes.
It is expected
that the total amount of land needed for streets will only increase from 160 to 190 acres. The present use of 511 acres
would increase to 890 acres occupying nearly all of the present corporate area of the community. The foregoing analysis
indicates the amount of land that should be provided in the
future land use plan and indicates the amounts of commercial
and industrial areas that should be provided for in zoning
areas within the present corporate limits and withiri the
areas iIIlmediately around the corpor·a te limits.
Land Use Plan
The proposed land use arrangement for a future community
of 4,700 is shown in the ·Land Use Plan (See Plate 3), which
generally indicates the areas proposed for residential, com~
mercial, industrial, and open space uses.
The Land Use Plan
is a synthesis of the economic population and land use studies.
Concurrent consideration was given to circulation and street
planning, community facilities, open spaces, and the total potential of the site.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

v==9-r-(I - - - - f ! - - - - = ==-----------········
\

"(,.

\.,.
&gt;

&gt;

::.,::\
).

I .

\·

,._DD1Tic:u,i "'l'O
c;,01,fl

C.OU.I\!!.£

I 1· -

USE

LAND
D
D
D

PLAN - 1985

~

RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
PUBLIC AND SEMI - PUBLIC.
PARKS, SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS

~

INDUSTRIAL AND

-

MAJOR

STREETS

RAILROADS
PLATE 3

�I
I

I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

.:. 17 This plan contemplates the rehabilitation and rebuilding of the central business distiict as the continued focal
point of commercial activity within the community and within
the trade area. Residential development has been confined
fairly well to create proper population densities.
Industrial development has been held to the existing industrial
areas along the railroad tracks and in a new area located
along the west side of the Interstate Highway. Recreat _ional
activities and open spaces have been created to serve the
various residential areas.
Residential Areas
The development of three major residential areas, with
park areas to serve as focal points for each residential area,
are contemplated. The existing elementary school located on
the south side of the city would serve the present residential
area south of Main Street and some proposed residential developments also south of Main and to the east of the existing
school site. A second residential area would be·iocated north
of Main and east of the railroad tracks. This_ re~idential
area would primarily be served by a proposed elementary school,
athletic field, and park area on Hayes Road. A third and
smaller residential area would include those areas west of
the railroad tracks, served by one 10-acre park area.
A desirable future distribution of dwelling units within
Gaylord was developed concurrently with the land use studies.
One dot on Plate 2 equals four dwelling units of the 1985 population of 4,700. A greater part of the new dwelling units
are expected to locate to the southeast, northeast, and north,
with lesser increases along the west city limits. The future
distribution also contemplates a limited amount of filling in
of certain of the vacant areas in the north section of the
city. This proposed distribution of dwelling units suggests
a generally balanced pattern and does not contemplate extensive dwelling unit development beyo.nd the planned residential
areas of the community. The planned future distribution of
dwelling units should result in an adequate density of dwelling units so as to provide a sound urban pattern. Generally
speaking, the density of the new and growing areas is slightly
less than the density of the present developed residential
areas of the city.
In the usual residential neighborhood, approximately one-half of the land is used for residential purposes with the remaining one-half used for streets, schools,
parks, churches, and parcels of vacant land. A residential
development with lots averaging 7,500 feet in area produces a
density for approximately three dwelling units per acre, in
contrast to large lots (20,000 square feet) where the average

I
!

' I

�-

18 -

density would be one dwelling unit per acre. Th~ Land Use
Plan and the distributi.o n of dwelling units shown _oIJ. Plate 2
provide a density of approximately two to three dwelling units
per acre. · This density is adequate to provide normal urban
services at reasonable costs.
Commercial Development
Under the proposed plan, the central business district
would remain the dominant commercial center of the city. Recognizing the need for highway commercial developments, the
plan proposes the commercial development at Main Street and
the Interstate Highway on the west side of the city. This is
in line with the economic requirements for greater recreational-tourist commercial activity, with planned touristoriented facilities at the various interchanges along the
Interstate Highway. This commercial center would be used
primarily for motels, restaurants, and various entertainment
and recreational activities. It is expected that the commercial uses south of the city would also be highway and touristoriented. Continued use of this area has been provided in
the plan as well as a new smaller commercial center to the
north on Old Highway 27 at the north city limits. This commercial area would be primarily for service of residential
uses.
Parks and Open Spaces
Al thou.g h Gaylord has a large amount of land dedicated
to various open spaces, only . a limited amount of land has
been provided for actual park use. The comprehensive plan
proposed the development of three major recreat_ional park
areas within the corporate limits. The present city park
and community school on the south side of the city would be
enlarged by approximately 30 acres over to a proposed extension of Grandview Boulevard. A completely new and enlarged
park, recreation and educational complex _is proposed in
the 40-acre tract on Hayes Road. This proposed park area
would serve the residential area north of Main Street and
would also provide athletic field facilities for the entire
county. The third and smaller open space has been proposed
in the west side of the city to serve the immediate residential area.
·
Industrial Areas
Industrial development is proposed to be continued along
the railroad tracks along the southeast side of Gaylord. However, future industrial growth is primarily expected to take

�I
I
I
I
I
I

I

'I
I
I
I

I

I

I

I
I
I
I

-

19 -

Table 5
FUTURE LAND USE REQUIREMENTS
Gaylord, Michigan
Acres of Land Per 100 Persons
Land Use
Classification

Needed by 1985

Acres of Land
Used in 1961

5.68

6.00

147.6

0.23
1.12
0.90
0.72
0.08

0.20
1.50
2.00
0.70
1.00

6.1
31.2
23.5
18.8
2.1

4. 71
6.12

3.50
4.00

122.5
159.1

19.56

18.40

510.9

Used in 1965

Single-Family
Residential
Two and Multiple
Family Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Railroads
Parks
Public and
Semi-Public
Streets and Alleys
Total

Acres of Land
Needed in 1985 (1)
Single-Family
Residential
Two and Multiple
Family Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Railroads
Parks
Public and
Semi-Public
Streets and Alleys

10
70
100
30
50
160
190
890

Total

(1)

280

Based on a population of 4,700.

�_f

- 20 place in the large industrial area along the west side of
Interstate 75. This area would ~e served by the interchange
on the Interstate Highway in Gaylord at _M-32 and by an interchange to the south with Old 27. The area is also close to
the existing Otsego County Airport. Thus, the proposed future
industrial area would be provided with highway access from the
Interstate Highway, with a major east-west highway and with
ready access to airport facilities.
· The Land Use Plan provides for a total urban area of
1,500- acres. Of this, approximately 680 acres has been set
aside for residential development. The plans provide for 200
acres of commercial development which is ample to meet the
estimated 70 acres shown in Table 5. The industrial areas
shown in the plan are far in excess of those .needed for the
City of Gaylord; however, this industrial area is designed
to serve the long-range needs of the entire county and is coordinated with the Land Use Plan for Otsego County. A total
70 acres of park space is provided._ ·in the Land use Plan which
is in excess of the required 50 acres shown in Table 5.

�---------------------------------------------~

I
I

- 21 THOROUGHFARE PLAN

••

I
I
I
I
l
I
I
I
I

t

I

I
■

I
I
I
I

The movement of traffic throughout a community can best
be accomplished by designating and improving to desirable
standards relatively few strategically-placed, direct and
continuous routes.
Control is facilitated and movement becomes more continuous, even when the traffic is concentrated
on a few thoroughfares, than when it is dispersed on most of
the streets within the community.
The major streets can be
improved with wider and heavier pavements to accommodate
ordinary traffic as well as the movement of trucks and heavy
vehicles. The remaining minor streets, which would constitute three-fourths of the total street system, can then be
relatively narrow and lightly paved. Thus, the cost of the
original construction of the street system as a whole can be
substantially reduced and the expense of street maintenance
can be held to a minimum. Further, as the preponderance of
traffic can be diverted from residential neighborhoods to
the streets in such areas, such streets will be safer to use
and will be less noisy.
Present Street System
Gaylord's street system has developed gradually since
the 1870's. During a century of evolution, the street system
has grown through the dedication of many individual rightsof-way and subdivisions. These have been generally small and,
for the most part, uncoordinated.
The present system forms a
gridiron pattern generally oriented due north, south and eastwest. Development of a gridiron system in Gaylord has created
problems found in most communities; that is, there is little
differentiation between major and minor streets, resulting in
the division of traffic on many of the residential streets.
Because of the original platting and fairly small blocks, there
is an obvious excess of streets; in some instances there are
streets every 300 feet in some of the originally platted sections near the center of the city.
Gaylord is served by Old U. s. Highway 27 which enters
the city from the north on Center Street, travels through the
central business area on Main Street, and extends to the south
out of the city on Otsego Avenue.
Michigan Highway 32 is an
important east-west route in northern Michigan and runs from
Charlevoix to Alpena. This route follows Main Street through
the entire length of the City of Gaylord.
Interstate 75, a
federal highway, is not a part of the Gaylord street system in
the strict sense, but does provide access to the city from
other parts of the county, the state, and the nation.
Interstate 75 passes along the west side of the city with a traffic

I

I

�•
•

- 22 Table 6
EXISTING MAJOR STREET DATA
G~ylord, Michigan
'•

Section

Name of Street
Main Stre~.t
Center Avenue
Otsego Avenue
Ohio Avenue
Fourth Street
Mitchell Street
Congdon Road
Hayes Road
Five Lake Road
McCoy Road
Dickerson Road
Murner Road

Right-ofWay Width

Pavenient
Width

80'
66'
66'

20'
20'
20'

66'
66'
66'
66'
66'
66'
66'
66'
66'

20'
20'
20'

Limits to Limits
Limits to Main
Main to Limits
Morgan Road
Main to Limits
Illinois to Oak
Ohio to Center
Morgan to Hayes
Main to Congdon
Morgan to Hayes
U.S. 27 to East
M-32 to South
M-32 to North

Type

Name ·of Street

of Paving (1)

Main Street
Center Avenue .
Otsego Avenue
Ohio Avenue
·
Fourth Street
Mitch~ll Street

Concrete with Bit. Con. Surface
Concrete with Bit. Con. Surface
Concrete with Bit. Con. Surface
Oil Seal and 1,320' Gravel
Oak to Elm Bit. Agg. Bal. Oil Seal
Bit. Agg. Center to Otsego 39' Wide

Congdon Road
Hayes Road

Unimproved Earth
3,328' Oil Seal Bal. Unimproved .
Earth
Morgan to Old 27 Bit. Agg. Bal. ,Oil
Seal
Bitull)inous Aggregate
Bituminous Aggregate .
Bituminous Aggregate

Five Lake Road
McCoy Road
Dickerson .Road
Murner Road

(1) Concrete, bituminous, oiled, gravel
(2) Good, fair, poor

**

20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
Condition(2)
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair to
Good
Poor
Fair to
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good

�I
I
I
I

. I
HIDDEN

"':::,
0
L

&gt; - - --

VALL E Y

:

)

..J

I

(

SKI

0

i..1 0 11.TWf lU ,1
:,.-.M1 TOR.. ! UM

'I

I

f

'I
',
'
'
',
'
'

M-3'2.

~ I
i

_ _ _ _ _ __j__
I __ _
OTS E GO

COUNTY

Al R.POR. T

:---=~~ :\1illfilm&amp;m:~=:=b(t1'•LA"ll l1, (l¥l l 0610,I U.

H~ IUAND I AllM Ol OW f W A PIID

M50CIAH5

I AI OSC.U!AlOl1llC
1'
~EPT , 196)
11 ,uo uu

IA1111 1oun

C! TY Pl ANNING (0t.lMl'S'5l0N

GAYlOkD

TRAFFIC
VEHICLES

PER

FLOW -

MICH IG AN

19~5

TWENTY - FOUR HOUR PERIOD

GRAPH IC. SCALE.

PLATE 5

�I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

- 23
interchange at the south end of the urban area where it
crosses Old U. S. 27 and on the west side of the city where
it crosses Michigan Highwat 32~
Gaylord presently has a fairly adequate street system,
consisting of Main Street which bisects the city in an eastwest direction, Murner Road, Center Avenue, Ohio Avenue, and
Hayes Road which run north from Main Street, Sand Road,
Otsego Avenue south of Main Street, and a fairly continuous
number of east-west routes consisting of Congdon Road, Five
Lake Road, Mitchell Street, Fourth Street and McCoy Road.
Data on the existing major streets within the Gaylord area is
shown in Table 6. By-and-large, most of the right-of-ways
are 60 foot with the exception of Main Street which has an
80-foot right of way. The Interstate Highway, not actually
a part of the internal street system, has a right-of-way width
of 400 to 500 feet.
All of the existing major streets in
Gaylord have two moving lanes with various widths for parking
lanes. Most of the paving is bituminous and is generally in
fair condition.
Lack of continuity found in some of the major thoroughfares in the southern part of the city is one of the major
problems of the present street system. For example, Fourth
Street does not run continuously east-west; there is no connection between Grandview Boulevard and Center Avenue, Maple
Avenue, or Hayes Road. There is also a lack of any adequate
connection between several of the north-south routes such as
Wisconsin Avenue with Ohio Avenue. Another problem is the
absence of cross-town routes in the northern part of the city.
North Street, for example, does not run continuously between
Ohio Avenue and Hayes Avenue. There are five railroad crossings of existing streets with the New York Central Railroad
tracks within Gaylord.
A number of these crossings do not
have proper protection.
Traffic Patterns
The average daily traffic flow in Gaylord for the major
streets within the city and on important county roads is shown
on Plate 5. These traffic volumes were obtained from counts
made by the State Highway Department in 1962 and from traffic
counts made by the Automobile Club of Michigan within Gaylord
in 1963. Some of the counts were obtained from the County
Road Commission's survey made in 1959.
As is apparent, the most important corridor of traffic
through the city is Main Street, which had a peak 24-hour
traffic volume in excess of 15,000 vehicles within the central
business district.
As would be expected, the next highest
volumes are found on Old U. s. 27 with some 4,400 cars on

�- 24 Center Ave.n ue north . of ·Ma;i.n Street . and some 7,700 cars on
Otsego Avenue south· of Main Street.. . The traffic volumes on
Main Street reduce very rapidly at .the edges of the urban
area with some 3,700 vehicles on Main Street or U. S. 32 just
east of the city limits. Twenty-four hour traffic volumes on
the Interstate Highway are approximately 3,000 to 3,500 vehicles per day, however, much higher voiumes exist during the
summer months. Most of the traffic on the Interstate is
through traffic; it does not originate or have its destination
within the City of Gaylord. Traffic flow on most of the other
streets within the city is less than 1,000 cars. Mitchell
Street does have some 1,600 cars in a 24-hour period just east
of Court Avenue. The traffic counts indicate that there is a
fairly wide dispersal of cars . ·traveling over . the other streets both major and minor - within the .c ommunity. For example, approximately five of the streets south of Main . Street have
traffic flows between 700 and 1,000 vehicles. This indicates
that no.n e of these streets is functioning as a major street;
that all of the traffic is dispersed widely over all of the
residential streets within the area, much to the disadvantage
of the residential amenities of these areas.
Traffic in urban areas is , expected to increase from four
to five perc·e nt per year; thus, by the year 1985 traffic is
expected to increase approximately 100 to 125. percent. For
the purposes of estimating future traffic volumes in Gaylord,
the existing traffic flows can be increased by 100 percent
for the 20-year period. Application of this increase to certain existing volumes reveals some significant increases; for
instance, traffic flow on Main S.t reet by 1985 would be in excess of 30,000 vehicles in a 24-hour period compared to .the
present range of 15,000 cars in 24 hours.
Proposed Thoroughfare Plan
The proposed thoroughfare plan has incorporated as many
of the existing streets within the community as possible,
with the number and length of proposed thoroughfares held to
a minimum consistent with sound planning principles. The
street plan was developed in conjunction with the highway
plan for the county and with the land .use plan to insure
proper ·development and access to all future land use development within the city.
(See Plate 6.)
The proposed major street system in Gaylord would consist of three major north-south routes - Wisconsin-OhioMorgan, Otsego-Center and Hayes Road. The east-west routes
would consist of Congdon Road, Five Lake Road, North Avenue,
Main Street, Fourth Avenue, and Grandview Boulevard.
In
order to complete this system of major thoroughfares, several extensions and improvement of existing major thoroughfares . would be necessary.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

m
I

I

m

\1

~

!

~

I

I

HIDDEN

'---

VA LLE Y
SKI

CLUB

L._ -

1 - · · -- - - - - l l l - - - - - l - - - • NOII..Tl-lfll,.N

~ANITOlllU"",

I
I

_L_

MAJOR
;;.:

STREET PLAN

=

EXISTING MAJOR STREETS
PROPOSED MAJOR STREETS
MI NOR STREETS
PROPOSED
STREET VACATIONS

•

RAILROAD

=c:::::i

-

CROSSING

ELIMINATIONS

Pl ATE 6

�I
I
I
I
I
I

ST~EET
Tl&lt;-.AFFIC
L/\ Nf.

FO~

THO~OUGHFA~ES

MAJ 0~

C ~OS S - S E. CT ION
PAl?-..K I NG
L/\ Nc ®

f&gt;Af!...f!...lf.l&lt;-. CUI&lt;-.!',
CLcAf!...ANct

E.LE.MENTS
MED I AN @

(61--.ASS STl?-.. I P
AN D SI D f. WA LK)

,f

10' 101 Y

I

·~ir7 i ·
1 4' lO T

n

MINIMUM

I

.,

I

2J

~
~

~luHT-OF-WAY
c;,o• kO. W .

'I

~EQUl~EMENTS
80' "-..0. W.

100' 11-...0W.

120' F-..0 . W.

2 H.AFflC LANESGJ
1 PM.. KIN6 LANE

I
I
I

2 1 ll..A fF IC LANE S 0)
2 PA!l..KIN6 LANES
3 TJ!.AFFIC LANES @
0 PA!l..KIN6 LANE,S

.3 Tll..AFFIC LANES @
1 PAJ!.KIN6 LANE

I
I

I
I
I
I
I

STANDA~DS

GENE ~AL

3 TJ!.AFFIC LANES@
2 PAF-.KIN6 LANES

MINIMUM
(13:,0)+

4 lF-.AFFIC LANES (2)
0 PAF-.K.IN6 LANES

MINIMUM
000

4 H... AF F IC LAN E S ([)
1 LEFT TUll.N LANE
0 PAJ!.KIN6 LANES
4 Tll..AFFIC LANES ([)
2 PAll.KIN6 LANES

MINIMUM
900

4 Tll.AFFIC LANES ([)

I LEFT TUP-.N LANE
2 PA!l..KIN6 LANES

MINIMUM
1150

G) THE LEFT TUP-.N LANES MAY l&gt;E 10' WIDE WITHOUT SEl'--.I OUSLY I MPA!l..lNCi OPEP-.,ATI O N.

®

WHEP-.E PAP-.K.INCi LANES A"-.E TO E&gt;E USED AS PEAK-HO U!l.. Tll.Aff lC LANES, THEY SHOULD E&gt;E DES ICiN ED TO H .. AfF I C LA NE
STANDAP-.DS WITH ll..ECiAF-.D TO CU!l..E&gt; CltAPs.ANCE LANE W I DTH, AND PAINT STJ!.IPE LO CAT ION.
@IF THE MEDIAN CONTAINS .~ LUT TUP-.N LANE , TH[ LEFT TUP-.N LANt WIDTH
(10'-12') MUST H ADDED TO T HE
MtDIAN WIDTH.

@
G)

©.

Q)

THE LAPs.CiEF-. 50"-.Dl"-. WIDTHS SHOULD 5[ USED ON THE WIDllt-. CP-.OSS-SECTIONS .
NO MEDIAN IS CONSIDEP-.ED ON THESE Cll..OSS-SECTION S.
THESE CP-.OSS-SECTIONS AP-.E FOil.. ONE-WAY H..AFFIC ONLY.
THtSt O... OSS-S[CTIONS All.E FOi-... TWO-WAY TP-.AfllC ONLY
PAJ!.,KIN6 PEll....MITHD ONLY WHEP-.E PAJ!.K.IN6 LANES Pll..OV I DED.
NUMH!l..S UNDEI'--. Cl'..DSS-SECTION CLASSIFICATIONS DESICiNATl DtS/6N CAPACITY IN VEHICL(S PE"-. HOUI'--. 5Y 0 ..055-StCTJON .
PLAIN NUM5EP-.S Al'...E FOil.. TWO-WAY Tll..AFFIC- PA"-.ENTHESIS NUMU"-5 AP-.E FOil.. ON[ - WAY TUfflC.
DATA TAKEN FP-.OM DESICiN CAPACITY CHA"-.lS FOil.. SICiNALIZED SH...EtT AND HICiHWAY INTl"-.SECTIONS, 5UJ!.,[AU OF PUBLIC
J!.OADS, Ps.tVIStD 1959, WITH THt FOLLOWINCi ASSUMPTIONS, 10% Tll.UCK.S - 20% J!.,/6HT TUP-.N -10% LEFT TUl'...N - NO BUS
STOPS - Cill.tEN/CYCL[ 4S % - NO S[PA"-AH LEFT TUll.N SIC, N/\L - PAP-.KIN6 PF...OH / blltD 100 FttT Fil.OM I NH"-.S[CTION .
"DOWNTOWN All.tA ( fOI'.... ONE-WAY 5Tll.ltTS ONL Y)
+Fl'... I N6 [ AP-.tl\ ( FOil. ON[-WAY Slll..ttTS ONLY)
INTt'--.MlDIAH APs.tA FOi._ TWO-WAY H.AFF IC VO LU MtS
M"-l l ... ND t,._lH• Ot O._.tw " N D AnOC IATfS
( •1•

, , , .,•!0 1

I• &gt; I 1., , ., l , ■ I ,,
HP ! 19 &amp;)

1~ •• • 1011•1

'

- y

• ~ l(

~ . •. ,...... -- ~

GAYLO~D

" I

• •&lt;• •, : • 1
" 11 0, u

.::~ ......

':i ~ - ·•

1.11(,. G"' N

PLATE 7

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 25 One of the most important proposals of the thoroughfare
plan is the re-routing of traffic from Main Street within the
central business district.
It is therefore recommended that
through traffic using Old U. S. Highway 27 continue south on
Center Avenue from Main Street to Second Street, travel two
blocks westward to Otsego Avenue, and then resume south along
the present route. One of the most serious points of congestion in the city is the two-block section on Main Street between Center Avenue and the railroad tracks. This would relieve this congested area of through north-south traffic. Main
Street would, of course, continue to handle through east-west
traffic.
This by-pass route would not require any new rightsof-way with the exception of rounding the northwest corner of
Second Street and Center Avenue.
There is a definite lack of through streets in Gaylord
south of Main Street. The thoroughfare plan would provide for
a new north-south route which would primarily consist of an
extension of Grandview Boulevard northeasterly into Hayes Road
at Main Street. This route would enable all traffic entering
the city from the east which is destined for the southern
parts of the city to by-pass the central business district.
It would also provide a boundary for the proposed expansion
of the school and park site. Much of the right-of-way for
this route could be acquired as properties are subdivided,
and the land is dedicated for future development. The land
use plan indicates a need for some improved east-west routing
in the northerly part of the city.
It is, therefore, recommended that North Street be developed as a continuous route
from Ohio Avenue over to Hayes Road. This would require several new sections of rights-of-way as shown on Plate 6, which
also could be acquired as these areas are subdivided in the
future.
Several other adjustments to the major street system are
recommended in the thoroughfare plan.
It is proposed that
Wisconsin Avenue be re-routed into Ohio Avenue, as shown in
the plan, to an area that is presently under consideration as
a shopping center. A second improvement would be the extension
of Fourth Street from Maple Avenue easterly to the Grandview
Boulevard extension, providing continuous east-west traffic
from Hayes to Wisconsin. Five Lake Road and Congdon Road
would continue to provide important east-west major routes in
the northern part of the city. The recommended cross-sections
for the proposed streets are shown on Plate 7.

�-I

I
I

I-I

I
-I

I
I

- 27 -

THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
Gaylord's business district .serves as a focal point
for a majority of the community's varied economic and social
activities and as a trade and tourist center for the surrounding territory.
The present business area is comparable with that of
other communities of similar size. Most of the buildings were
erected many years ago, and today are approaching obsolescence.
The area grew without any real direction, being developed by
many separate individuals without consideration for the entire
area. The present street system is fairly adequate; however,
in previous years a great volume of through traffic was forced
into this central area. Although there is a sizeable amount
of on-street parking, very little off-street parking has been
developed. Little, if any, attention has been given to pedestrian access other than provision of standard sidewalks.
Land Use Pattern

~

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

The preponderance of commercial development is found
along the frontages of Main Street from the railroad tracks
to Center Avenue, a three block distance. This area contains
the primary retail and walk-in commercial facilities.
Commercial uses are also found along Main Street from the railroad
tracks west to the Interstate 75, but they are more in the
nature of automotive-oriented commercial facilities such as
restaurants, filling stations, and entertainment facilities.
Commercial -uses are also found along some of the streets
crossing Main Street, although to a lesser degree. The
greatest secondary concentration is along Otsego Avenue primarily south, and to some extent north, of Main Street.
Commercial uses have scattered in and around Hurst and Second
Street south of Main Street. These commercial uses in Gaylord
primarily form an elongated pattern which does not provide the
most efficient and desirable type of commercial center. Only
a limited number of industrial uses have intermixed with the
commercial uses within the commercial area.
A railroad track
crossing Main Street has provided a barrier for commercial
uses to the west.
Gaylord's business district is not totally prepossessing
in its appearance. Although there have been a number of buildings remodeled in recent years, a number of which are along the
Tyrolean architectural line, many remaining buildings are old
and obsolete.
In addition to the obsolete buildings, the
presence of numerous signs and overhead telephone and utility

�~

- 28 wires and poles add to the cluttered appearance of the area.
Any re-planning of Gaylord's business district should give
serious consideration to the aesthetic improvement of the
total area and all o~. the buildings within the area.
These conditions are not peculiar to Gaylord. Practically every city has recognized the poor appearance of its
central area and is attempti~g to accent attractiveness in
order to successfully compete with newly developing centers.
Street Pattern
The streets of Gaylord's business district are laid out
in a system running north-south and east-west. Through traffic is concentrated . on Main Street and th~re are no parallel
streets that are used to by-pass traffic around the area.
Early problems of the business district were created because
both U. s. 27 and Michigan 32 passed directly through the
area on Main Street~ The completion of Interstate Highway
75 removed much of the north-south traffic; however, there
continues to be a considerable amount of through traffic on
Michig~n ~2. Thro~gh traffic does not add to the activity
of the area and represents a detriment to the area's future
function. The ~ight-o~-way width of all streets within the
central area . is 66 feet with the exception of Main Stre~t,
which has an 80-foot right-of-way.
Traffic · volumes within the central area are comparatively
high for a community of Gaylord's size. Traffic volumes .on
Main Street, between Center and the railroad tracks, are -in
excess of 15,000 cars in a 24-hour period.
A high volume is
also found on Otsego Avenue south of Main, with 7,700 cars in
24 hours.
West of the railroad tracks, the traffic volume
decreases to 9,200 cars in a 24-hour period. North of Main
Street on Old Highway 27, the volume is more than 5,000 vehicles. Minor traffic flows are found on Mitchell .Street, First
Str~et and Second Street - all less . than 1,000 .v~hicles in 24
hours.
·
Peak hour traffic volull\es generally represent ten percent
of the total 24-hour traffic flow. The highest peak hour
volume within Gaylord's business area would be on Main Street
at Court Avenue, with a peak flow of app+oximately 1,500 vehicles.
The capacity of this street, assuming 500 cars per lane,
would indicate that traffic flow . on Main Street is reaching a
critical point, especially during tQe peak-hour periods and
during the summer months. The peak flow, however, on the remainder of the streets within the area, does not appear to be
critical. There is no need for any major pavement widening.

•'I
•
•
•ti
ll

ll

t,

�- 29 -

Parking Facilities
Existing parking facilities in the business district consist primarily of curb spaces with only a small amount of offstreet parking. The following review of the use of parking
facilities indicates that while there are a number of curb
spaces, there is a definite need to provide additional offstreet parking facilities.
The types of existing parking facilities are summarized
in the following:
Type of
Parking Facility

Number of Spaces

Street Parking
2-Hour Meters
2-Hour Meters - Summer
12-Minute Meters
12-Minute Meters - Summer
10-15 Minute Posted
12 10-15 Minute Posted
2-Hour Posted
No Limit
Total

110
89
2
2
15
108
54
15
380

Off-Street Parking
Public Lots
Private Lots

289

51
Total

Total All Parking

340
720

There are a total of 720 parking spaces within the central business district study area. Of the total, only 340 (or
47 percent) are off-street spaces, with the majority being on~treet parking spaces. Most of the on-street parking space is
·2-hour posted or 2-hour metered. These, with the no-limit
spaces, total 304 parking spaces which can be used by persons
parking for a fairly long period of time. Only 42 percent of
the parking spaces within the central area are designed for
tourists or for shoppers remaining parked for less than two
hours.
It is unfortunate that, of the 720 existing spaces, a
total of 289 are private parking spaces, representing 40 percent of the total parking within the study area.
The off-street parking facilities within the business district are generally inconvenient and are not easily accessible
to the commercial frontages along Main Street. A parking turnover and accumulation study was conducted within the study area

�- 30 Table . 7
PERCENTAGE OF VEHICLES PARKING BY. TIME - PERIODS
Gaylord, Michigan :

Time Period

½ hour
½ to 1

or less
hour
1 to I½ hours
l½ to 2 hours
2 to 2½ hours
2½ to 3 hours
3 to 3½ hours
3½ to 4 hours
4 hours or more

Time Period

½ hour
½ to 1

or less ·
hour
1 to l½ hours
l½ to 2 hours
2 to 2½ hours
2½ to 3 hours
3 to 3½ hours
3½ to 4 liours
4 hours oi:- more

Source:
(1)

Two-Hour
Meters

Two-Hour
Posted (1)

80.2
13.2
3.8
2.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
100.0

68.1
15.9
5.0
3.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.5
1.0
100.0

10 and 15
Minute
Meters
71.5
21 .. 4

o.o
o.o
0.0
o.o
o.o
o.o

7.1
100.0

Two-Hour
Posted

Private
Lots

Public
Lots

Unrestricted
Spaces

50.0
11.1
5.6
16.7
5.6
5.5

11.5
13.6
6.2
5.2
3.1
13.6
6.2
5.2
35.4
100.0

10.9
4.3
4.4
8.7
6.5
15.2
13.0
6.5
30.5
100.0

43.4
16.7
10.0
3.3

o.o
o.o

5.5
100. 0 -

o.o

3.3
6.7
3.3
6.7
100.0

Survey by Harland Bart4olomew and Associates,
December 29, 1964

Two-hour posted, two-hour. metered in summer.

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-I
I
I
I
I

'I
I

II

�- 31 of the central business district. This study was carried out
during the peak ski season in 1964. A sample of all types of
parking within the central area was checked every one-half
hour and license numbers were recorded as part of the turnover
survey. Results of this survey are shown in Table 7.
Concurrently, an accumulation survey was made in which every parked
vehicle within the study area was recorded every hour every
day. The information on this survey is shown in the following:
Time Period
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00

Vehicle
Accumulation

355
448
472
407
435
478
445
434 . ·
354
216

The accumulation of vehicles recorded on December 29 and
December 30 were increased by a factor of 1.3 to produce the
foregoing estimates of vehicle accumulation during the average
summer day. A peak accumulation occurred at 2:00 in the afternoon with a total of 478 vehicles, which represented 66.5 percent of the total 720 available spaces. The next highest peak
was found at 11:00 in the morning with 472 spaces occupied. In
view of the fact that 289 spaces (or 40 percent) are private
spaces, this indicates that all available public space was
occupied during the peak period of accumulation. These
figures are only estimates of summer accumulation and, on
many days during the summer, these figures are exceeded. The
highest recorded peak period during the actual time of the
survey was 368 vehicles at 2:00 p.m. compared to 153 vehicles
at 6:00 p.m., which is the lowest recorded parking accumulation.
The percentage of vehicles parking by time periods is
shown in Table 7 for one-half hour periods up to four hours or
more.
Similar to most communities, a greater percentage of the
parking is taking place on the metered curb spaces for one hour
or less. As shown on Table 7, 80 percent of the parkers in the
two-hour metered spaces are remaining for one-half hour or less
and 93 percent are parking for one hour or less. Similarly, in
the two-hour posted spaces, 68 percent are parking for one-half
hour or less and nearly 16 percent remain for one hour or less.

�-

32 -

On private lots, parking periods are for longer times, with
only 25 percent remaining parked for one hour or less and
over 35 percent staying for four hours or more.
Parking in
the public lots is also more on a long-term basis; only 15
percent utilized spaces for one hour or less and 30. percent
remained· for over four hours. · This turnover survey definitely
indicates a very high demand for short-term parking as is evidenced by the use of the existing two-hour meters and two-hour
posted spaces at the curbs.
Also, there is no significant
amount of long-term public parking available within the business area.
The maximum accumulation of 478 vehicles in the central
area essentially represents the existing demand for parking
space. This total of 478 occupied spac_e s must be increased
by approximately 15 percent for vacancy to allow time for entering and leaving spaces. Therefore, an additional 72 spaces
must be added to the actual demand, producing a total parking
demand of 558 spaces within the study area. The present population of 2,568 in 1960 is expected to nearly double by 1985.
The present parking demand can be expected to increase approximately two times, producing a 1985 parking demand for 1,100
spaces.
The distribution of new parking spaces, based upon the
turnover study, should be as follows; for every 100 parking
spaces, there _should be 41 one-hour spaces, 11 one to two
hour spaces, 17 two to four hours spaces, and 31 spaces for
four hours or more.

1 Hour
or Less

1 to
2 Hours

2 to
4 Hours

4 Hours

Over
Total
lOQ.O

Percent Parked

80.7

7.6

6.4

5.3

Average Length
of Time Parked

0.6

. 1. 7

3.2

7.0

Space Hours Parked
Per 100 Cars Parking

48.4

12.9

20.5

37.1

118.9

Spaces Required Per·
10~ Cars Parking

41

11

17

31

100

Of · tbe existing 720 total parking spaces, approximately 52 of
every 100 spaces should be used for one hour and one to two
hour parking· space, for a total of 374 spaces. At the
present time, there are only 253 spaces that are restricted

•I

•
•
•

•
•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
~

�J

______,,,~'----.

.___

- --- - - - -

....
. . . .. . . . . .. .. ... .

-

.

EXISTING BUILDING
GR-OUPS TO IZ.cMAI N

-I.____

-~----

TO ~l(iij'l.iAY

MITCH ELL

27

sT.

. . .

. . .. . .. ..

.. .

u...i

&gt;

.

.

.

. .

&lt;l:

-

PIZOPOSED BUILDINGS
PIZ.OPOSED Cl TY COUNTY 5UILDING
D IZ.f SI DtNTI AL AKt AS
CJ OPEN SPACES
Imm PKOPOSfD PtDfST/\IAN MALLS

&lt;t

z

-&lt;(

a

CE$

:z

i I ~ I I ' ----'---t!:U
'- ~ - I

---

----

-

U51DrNT/AL

•
•
•Ill
Ill
II
II

/

ST

so

ANOLt

SPACES CUANGE.D
SPACES

CITY PLAN
6AYLOP--.D,

COM/1\IS&lt;,ION
MIC~IOAN

Tr1! U,.flAlATIO ,- Of T,U MAI WA) IJ-lANCIALlt
,1, 1DID lHlOiJGrt A HOllA.L Gl AH1 rLCW, IHI.
UA.I AH llN!,,,'Al A01,1!Nll1L.ATl0t,, ,i&gt;f IM! HOuS·

.. . .....

WG AND HOlitl IINANCI AulNCY UN!H~ !If. UI.·
IJ.H ,tJ,,.HING A)~HA1&lt;tCl ll.06lA"' ,._UINOl·
tl(D If YC T!ON 701 Of lHl NOIJ)mc, ACT Of
19S~ A) AM(HDlD

·*l.o'.&gt;1.·.10
".3&lt;1 • CO ~b: SY-Ac.ts· . ·. ·
-su;en.·.vAc..ur

C.
&lt;(

NS

·4-.

. ~O(H\
.
...
. . ..
. . ·$DUrn
. . . .-Cir:
. . .M
. IN

0
&lt;&gt;L
...J

.

::r . . . .
· ....

.....
·.....
. . . . .. . .

\J

I-IAUAND f)A"TWLOMEW AND ASSOCIAHS
e, ITY PlANHf~S, llVIL tl'/6/HE:tF-S, WIDSCAPf ARCUITECTS
SAINT LOUIS, Ml S',OUP-.I,
SEPW'l\btP-, 1965

:

.. ·. : ·... : .. ...

.. . ..

·. . . . . .

·.. ./\.E. ·y. 1 -D· f.(1"1· ~ ~ ·

·.... ·.: ·.. : ·.•:· .· : ·....
.• ••. . . . . . .
. .. · .·. ·. .......
·. . ... ..

I

____, J

...____

__

·-·· - .

•

1

.

• • • •

----

)fCOND

ST.

-----

f)LJSINESS

DI ST~I CT

PLAN

-

_./

I
I

�t

'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

-

33 -

to two hours or less. Further, any elimination of curb parking spaces along Main Street through changes from angle parking to parallel parking and the elimination of any .parking
spaces on Court Avenue, would further increase the immediate
demand.
It is therefore estimated that there should be an
additional 200 off-street parking spaces provided within the
business district within the next few years to meet current
demand. A total of 600 public parking spaces should be provided by 1985.
Development Plan for the Business District
The plan for the Gaylord business district contemplates
a gradual rebuilding and rehabilitation of the area into a
more compact shopping and big business center with improved
appearance, adequate parking, a functional street system, and
planned pedestrian circulation.
(See Plate 8.) It is a longrange plan designed to be carried out in stages; it is one
that will take a number of years for realization. The plan
will basically require revitalization of buildings, the development of several public parking lots, and some very minor
street vacations for pedestrian malls •
Land Use Development
Fundamental to the proposed plan for the district is the
rebuilding of a large, central core area consisting of an area
generally bound by the New York Central Railroad tracks on the
west, Mitchell Street on the north, Center Avenue on the east,
and Second Street on the south.
Many of the existing buildings
within this area would be rehabilitated; others would be removed and replaced with parking facilities and commercial structures. As the community grows and the estimated population
reaches 4,700 persons, this rebuilding and replacement will become more feasible.
The plan contemplates a concentration of
commercial development along Main Street from Center Avenue to
the New York Central Railroad tracks, with a pedestrian northsouth orientation along Court Avenue from Second Street to
Huron Street extended •
The plan includes three pedestrian malls within the area
as shown on Plate 8. These malls or walkways are placed along
the vacation of Court Avenue. The proposed malls would be 66
feet wide and should be properly landscaped and oriented for
pedestrian use.
An important mall would run from Main Street
north to a large series of public off-street parking lots north
of the building frontages on Main Street.
At the north axis of
this pedestrian mall would be a new proposed specialty shop or
building of unique design.
A second mall would run south from

�...; 34 -

Main Street -to First Street along the east etjge of the proposed new ;ci ty:-county building. The. third inall would run a
short distance south of First Street within •the Court Avenue
right-of-way to ·a second proposed building of unique design.
The building to the north and the ·building to the south along
this pedestrian mall would act as focal points along this main
pedestrian access.
The third mall would provide access to a
large proposed public parking area along the ·south side of
First Street.
The plan envisions the gradual rebuilding of existing
buildings within the area and encourages the gradual development of buildings along the Tyrolean architectural theme. The
same type of architectural concept should be applied to the
proposed city-county building in a subdued manner, and in a
more elaborate manner to the buildings at the north and south
axis of the proposed pedestrian malls. The existing and proposed general locations for building groups are shown- on ·
Plate 8.
Primarily, it is expected that commercial activity will
be centered along Main Street and to a lesser degree along
Otsego Avenue, the Court Avenue mall, and First Street.
If
additional commercial space is needed within t _h e central area,
the properties along the north side of Second Street between
Court Avenue and Center Avenue conceivably could be used for
special commercial facilities.
No significant changes are proposed in· the street system
for the central business area other than the vacation of Court
Avenue.
It is recommended that Main Street, First Street, and
Second Street function as important-east-west circulatory
streets within the business area.
Similarly, Otsego Avenue
and Center Avenue would provide major north-south circulation.
A major change proposed for traffic within the central area
would be providing increased capacities for Main Street.
It
is recommended that Main Street be changed to four moving lanes
with two parallel .parking lanes.
It would also be possible to
provide for ten-foot left turning lanes by eliminating parking
at the intersections with Center and Otsego Avenues. Main
Street would provide four moving lanes through the entire central area from Elm Avenue to Interstate Highway 75.
To further reduce future through traffic on Main Street,
Old Highway 27 should by-pass the central core area by directing through traffic entering the business area on the north
to Center Avenue, south to Second Street .and then westerly along
. Second Street to Otsego Avenue. -This would · require improved
paving along this four block by-pass section for two moving
lanes of traffic.

I'

•I
II

•..

1

�I

•
•I
•
-I
t
I

-I

- 35 The development plan would provide an extensive system
of off-street parking facilities within the central area. Many
of these parking facilities can be provided in the areas that
are presently vacant; however, in order to make the parking
accessible and usable to the retail uses, it will be necessary
to gradually acquire existing commercial and residential structures.
The proposed parking areas are fairly well distributed
throughout the area so that there is an equal amount of parking throughout all parts of the area.
Proposed parking area A is located in the northwest section and would provide for a total of 76 spaces. This would
require very little demolition of existing buildings for this
public parking area. By far, the largest parking area would
consist of all the off-street spaces in public parking area B.
This area extends north from the buildings on Main Street,
from Otsego Avenue to Center Avenue, and would provide for a
total of 370 parking spaces. The service alleys north of
Main Street would be retained in the plan.
Court Avenue would
not be connected with this proposed parking facility but would
be provided with a cul-de-sac for the residential uses to the
north.
Access to this large parking area would be accomplished
with two entrances from Otsego Avenue and two entrances from
Center Avenue. Parkers would be able to circulate through the
entire area with two-way traffic on all access drives.
The
third major parking area is shown south of First Street between
Center Avenue and the vacated Court Avenue. This consists of
the existing city parking lot which would be enlarged to provide for a total of 170 parking spaces. Additional parking
facilities are shown in the plan through a combination of public or private spaces in the block bounded by Main, Center,
First, and Court Streets. Also, additional parking facilities
are recommended to the west along the New York Central Railroad
tracks south of Main Street.
There are presently 420 on-street parking spaces within
the study area; of these, 370 spaces would be retained in the
plan, as well as 300 existing off-street spaces. The proposed
plan would provide for a total of 600 public off-street spaces,
with 150 of the private spaces retained. There would be a
total of 750 off-street spaces in the plan. The 370 retained
curb spaces and the proposed 750 off-street spaces would provide for a total of 1,120 parking spaces. This plan meets the
1985 estimated demand for approximately 1,100 parking spaces
within the central area.

H
I

�- 37 -

COMMUNITY FACILITIES
Community facilities in the form of parks, schools, and
public buildings are integral parts of the physical structure
of every community. They have a very definite influence on
the community's appearance and livability, providing not only
essential open spaces but often serving as focal points for
community activities of . all kinds. The availability and adequacy of various public utilities are a definite measure of
the quality and the desirability of a community.
Existing Community Facilities
The existing community facilities within the City of
Gaylord have been developed over a period of many years. The
present system of parks, schools, public buildings, and underground utilities have been developed by separate groups at
varying periods of time, resulting in a relatively unrelated
system of facilities within the city.
Park and Recreational Facilities
Although there are a number of recreational facilities
within Otsego County at the present time, only one park area
has been developed within the City of Gaylord. This consists
of a two-acre park located on the south side of Fourth Street
adjacent to the Gaylord community schools. This park is a
small, wooded, pleasant park but does not provide any facilities.
Although there are many recreational outlets for the
population of Gaylord, there are no close-in recreational
spaces. There is one nine-bole golf course open to the general public just south of the city on Old Highway 27. Both
Otsego County and the State of Michigan operate parks on
Otsego Lake, however, they are primarily camping areas. The
City of Gaylord has a totally inadequate park and recreational
program, even for a community of its size.
A determined effort must be made to develop a proper park system in the future.
School Facilities The Gaylord Community School District is one of the
larger school districts within the county and provides both
elementary and secondary education. The district operates
one school site located within the City of Gaylord, generally
on the south side of Fourth Street and east of Elm Avenue.
The present facilities include an elementary school, which was
built in 1957 and enlarged in 1964. Grades K-6 are taught in
24 classrooms within this school. The school has a total capacity for 720 students, compared to a 1964-1965 enrollment

·1

�- 38 of 658 students. This represents an enrollment under-capacity
of 62 students. Also located on the 40-acre site is the
school district's junior and senior high school. Major additions were made in 1964 to the building, which was originally
constructed iri . 1951. Both the junior grades, 7 through 9, and
senior grades 10 through 12 . are taught in the school's 32
classrooms~ This facility h&lt;iS a total capacity for 960 students; compared ·to a present enrollment of 509 showing an excess capacity within this school for 451 students.
The trends in public school enrollments in the Gaylord
School District over the past ten yeJrs are shown in the following table:
Year
. ..

~

.

·1951-52
1955-56
1956-57
1957-58
1958-59
1959-60
1960-61
1961-62
1962-63
1963-64
1964-65

Grades
9-12

K-12

204
224
205
210
256
283
302
333
315
336
332

760
858
832
821
906
1005
1019
1149
1121
1163
1187

K-6

7-8

452
504
486
491
524
566
.561
663

104
:130
141
120
126
153
156
153
131
153
177

.675

674
658

School enrollments have increased nearly every year since the
·1951-1952 school year, from :7 60 in the 1951-52 school year to
1,187 in the 1964-65 school year.
A fairly uniform increase
in enrollment bas taken place in all grades - elementary, ·junior, and senior. Elementary enrollments have increased from
452 to 658 during the 10-year period. Similarly, junior enrollments have increased from · 104 to 177, and senior enrollments
have increased from 204 to 332. This represents a 25 percent
increase in elementary enrollments, a 73 percent increase in
junior enrollments, and a 58 percent increase in senior high
school enrollments during the past 10 years.
Projections of future school enrollments indicate a total
of 2,400 students for the entire · county, · an increase of 600
students over the current county-wide enrollments.
It · is expected that the Gaylord - Community School District - will receive
a greater part of these increased school enrollments, or approximately 520 additional students. -It ·is estimated that elementary enrollments in grades K-6 will represent 59 percent of the
enrollment, grades : 7 and 8 will' represent 60 percent of the

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-I
I
I

-

39 -

enrollment, and grades _9 through 12 will represent 25 percent
of the total enrollment. This breaks down to an increase over
current enrollments within the Gaylord Community School District of 310 elementary students, 100 junior students, and
110 senior students.
·
The St. Mary's School in Gaylord currently has an enrollment of 610 students in grades 1 through 12.
If St. Mary's
enrollment increases at approximately t~e same _ percentage rate
as the public schools, there would be approximately 200 additional students by 1985. The plans for public schools for the
Gaylord area assume that this increase will occur.
Public Buildings
The Gaylord Municipal Building is located on Court Avenue
across from the county courthouse. The structure was built in
1912 and remodeled in 1949. The building is used for all of
the city governmental offices including police, justice court,
the city library, and an auditorium seating about 600 persons.
Fire trucks formerly housed in this building were moved recently to a different building. The building is in fair to
good structural condition, but would require extensive remodeling to provide the space and services required by the city. The
city offices are located on the first floor in an extremely
small area totally inadequate to provide efficiently the necessary city services.
A large area on the second floor is devoted to an infrequently used auditorium seating about 600 persons and to a library. The space formerly used by the fire
trucks is not being utilized at the present time. The Gaylord
fire hall is located on the northwest corner of Otsego Avenue
and Second Street, where the city's two fire trucks were moved
recently.
The building location and facilities are adequate
to serve Gaylord and the surrounding area since the fire hall
has immediate access to Otsego Avenue.
This thoroughfare, in
turn, provides immediate access to the central business area
and to the industrial areas on the south side of the city, in
addition to having access to Main Street for the east and west
sides of the city.
There are a number of other public buildings located within the City of Gaylord that would have a definite effect upon
public building planning for the City of Gaylord. The county
courthouse was built in 1891; additions and improvements were
made in 1948 and again in 1951. The building is in fair to
good structural condition.
It is considered inadequate for
present and future county needs.
The United States post office in Gaylord is located on the business district on the
west side of Court Avenue. The building and site are relatively new, but both are too small to provide adequate services to the present and future population.

·t

�-

40 -

The Otse·g o_· County Road Co~:j..ssion offices and garage
are located on Otsego Avenue s _o u:th of the Gaylord business
district. The structure was built in 1940 and has major additions . in 1964. The building is a modern facility, adequate
to meet the future needs of the road commission. The State
Conservation Department has a district office and central repair shop in two buildings on Otsego Avenue just north of the
County Road Commission building. The conservation . department
also has a large storage yard . adjacent to the road commission
storage yard. ' Both of these operations are in a satisfactory
location in · relation to developments in Gaylord. The Gaylord
State Police Post is located across the street from the conservation department building. These state and county functions are logically located within the city.
Community Facilities Plan
Long-range proposals for community facilities are shown
on.Plate 9. The comm~nity facilities plan proposed the utilmate development of tliree city parks, a new elementary school,
and considerable ·expansion of the sanitary sewer system and
water system. The various proposals are · discussed i _n the
following:
Recreational Areas
The plan proposes the ultimate development of three recreational areas throughout the city. The present city park,
located on the south side of the city on Fourth Street, would
be expanded by approximately 30 acres. This park, the present
school site, and the proposed expansion area would provide a
total park area in excess of 70 acres. This park area would
be located on the proposed extension of Granqview . Boulevard
into Hayes Road. This section of . highway could be developed
in an attractive manner and would provide an excellent view
and appearance for this section of the city. This proposed
expansion area should contain a comple.t e unit of neighborhood
recreational facilities including playground equipment, hard
surface courts, ball diamonds, and other active recreational
facilities.
A major feature of tµe recreation plan is a proposed 40acre educational and recreational site located on the west side
of Hayes Road. This site would serve as a location for a proposed elementary school and for city and county recreational
purposes.
It is recommended that the area be used as a neighborhood park for the area north of Main and east of the railroad tracks; This would include a complete contingent of
neighborhood recreational facilities similar to those proposed

�I
l
I
I
I

\

1

\'

~

)

~~--

;

.

'

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

PROPOSED SITE E
I FOR C.\TY PAR
!AND SCHO
t 30 ACRES)

END~D
DDITION
C.OUR.SE.

I

I
I

I
I
I

ANSION

- --==r1=:~WJlmJJ[lilllk==::=!=

MAllAND IAUHOlOM(W AND AHOCIATU
(11• • l """IU,

1A1u

,01111

Cl¥rll01•1•UU. \A •Ol(NI A.C•tTIC TI

Hn

COMMUNITY
iii
D
--

FACILITIES

1&lt;iH

io,no1.11o1

C I TY PLANNING COMM ISSIO N

GAYlOl0

MICI0GAN

PLAN

PARKS, SCHOOLS, HOS Pl TALS
AND COURT HOUSE.
ALL OTHER PUBLIC AND SEM \PUBLIC USES
NEIGHBORHOODS

PLATE 9

�- 41 for the park to the south.
In addition, it is recommended
that this area be developed as a major athletic field for the
entire county, providing a large track, stands, field house
facilities within the elementary school, lighted ball diamonds,
tennis courtsi and other hard surface courts for a complete
range of outdoor athletic facilities.
So as to properly. serve the residential areas on the west
side of Gaylord, it is recommended that a 10-acre park be developed.
This area would be developed primarily with neighborhood facilities si.milar to those of the south neighborhood
park and the proposed neighborhood park on Hayes Road; equipment should include playground apparatus, a ball diamond, and
other such active recreational facilities.
Public Schools
A consolidated county-wide school district was proposed
as a part of the Otsego County Comprehensive Plan. The plan
recommended that the Gaylord High School serve as a county-wide
senior high school and that the other Gaylord, Johannesburg,
and Vanderbilt schools provide only elementary and junior high
education. Projections for public schools indicate that there
will be an additional 300 elementary students by 1985, meaning
that the Gaylord schools will have approximately 950 elementary students. This is too large an enrollment for one elementary school; therefore, the plan recommends that a second
elementary school be built in the proposed site on Hayes Road.
This new school would also be in an area where considerable
population growth is anticipated.
The junior and senior high school facilities would be contained in the present junior and senior facilities in the
Gaylord community school site. Total enrollment at the high
school would be approximately 900 students, including the
Gaylord junior high school students and the county-wide senior
high school students.
The county comprehensive plan recommended that consideration be given to the establishment of a vocational school. The
population of Otsego County may not be large enough to support
such a facility, . but the combined population of Otsego County
and several of the adjoining counties would be sufficient for
such support.
It was also suggested that Gaylord would be a
logical location for such a vocational school.
It is recommended that this facility be developed on the same site with
the junior and senior high school, with the vocational school
generally fronting on the proposed extension of Grandview
Boulevard.

�- 42 Proposed City-County Building
The present municipal building, the county courthouse
and the post office in Gaylord are considered to be functionally obsolete and inadequate for their intended purposes. In
coordination with the Comprehensive Plan for Otsego County,
the Gaylord Comprehensive Plan recommends the development of
a city-county building, which would house all of the functions
of the present municipal building and the courthouse. The
post office could be incorporated into this building as well.
A study of space requirements indicates that the proposed
building should provide approximately 60,000 square feet of
floor space for all m~nicipal, county, and post office functions.
The functions of the large, generally unusable courtroom
in the courthouse and the sizeable auditorium in the municipal
building could be combined into a new modern courtroom and
large meeting room in the new buildfng.
In addition to this,
a smaller meeting room would be necessary for the Board of
Supervisors and the City Council meetings.
At least. ,one other
small· ·meeting room should be made availabl,e to serve the needs
of both the city and the county. The library should also be
located in this building.
It is expect~d that fire protection
equipment would remain in the present fire hall~
In general,
complementary functions such as the sheriff and city police
should be able to a·c hieve a better degree of coopera:tion by
being located in the same building. The combination of - both
city and county offices would enable a dual utilization of
space, permitting a more efficient operation of both governments than could be realized in the present old buildings.
The plan strongly recommends construction of a new citycounty building on the present site of the county courthouse.
Unique advantages of · the site include its location in the
Gaylord central business district, making the building convenient to those people in the area of greatest activity in the
county; its positive effect of bringing additional people into
the business area who may shop while attending to other .affairs;
and its possession of an open green area. The open space lends
a special attractiveness to the business area, giving it a
unique and exquisite characteristic lacking in many other central districts.
One possible disadvantage in using the site in this manner
is that the area could provide space for additional parking and
business. This is a minor consideration however because of
the inherent aesthetic value of the open space. The development of this site for business use might even prove to be a
detriment to the business area, since the district would then
lose one of its best features. A summary of existing and proposed community facilities is shown in Table 8.

I-

I
I
I

�II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
II

-

43 -

Table 8
EXISTING AND PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES
Gaylord, Michigan

Type of
Facility

Year
Built

Use of
Facility

Area of Site in Acres
Existing
Proposed
Tota!

Municipal
Building

1912
(1949)

Offices,
Auditorium,
Library and
Police

0.1

Site to be
abandoned

Site to be
abandoned

Post Office

1952

U. S. Post
Office

0.1

Courthouse

1891

County
Offices

2.1

Proposed
City-County
Building

Fire Hall

City and
County
Offices,
Auditorium,
Library,
Police and
Post Office
1935

City Park

2.1

Use the present
Courthouse site

Houses two
fire trucks

0.3

0.3

Passive park
with no
facilities

2.0

2.0

Gaylord
Elementary

1957
( 1964)

24 Classrooms

Gaylord High

1951
(1964)

32 Classrooms

On same site
as above

Proposed City
Park &amp; School
Site on Hayes
Road

A complete
athletic field
and elementary
school

40.0

40.0

Proposed West
Neighborhood
Park

Recreational
facilities

10.0

10.0

40.0

30.0

70.0

�I

'I
'
'
'I
'
'
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

45 -

REGULATORY MEASURES
Zoning Regulations
The control of land use through zoning is a vital portion of city planning if the community is to- avoid a chaotic
pattern of intermingled residential, commercial; and industrial uses. Land use and the intensity of development form
the basic community pattern; their harmonious relationship is
an essential beginning step in the creation of a satisfactory
city.
Gaylord has enjoyed the protection and guidance afforded
by comprehensive zoning since 1946. The present ordinance has
been amended in some minor respects, but it essentially has remained unchanged since adoption. The basic objectives of· zoning have not substantially changed in recent years, even though
there have been improvements in zoning techniques and ·a -broader
legal support for some of the aspects of zoning. Zoning is
still concerned with three types of regulations; namely, the
use of land and buildings, the amount of open space that must
be provided around buildings, and the maximum height of buildings.
Although modern ordinances generally require the provision of space for off-street parking, this requirement is
closely associated with the provision of front, side, and rear
yards. Practically all ordinances also regulate the intensity
of land use and buildings or the density of population by specifying the number of families that may occupy a lot of acertain size.
Gaylord's zoning ordinance was authorized under an Enabling
Act adopted by the State Legislature. Act 207, which is still
in effect with little or no modification since its original
passage, is similar in most respects to zoning enabling legislation adopted by other states. The language of the act clearly
defines the major principles that should be considered when preparing and adopting a zoning ordinance.
The original zoning ordinance in Gaylord was prepared without the benefit of a plan for future land use.
Such a plan has
been prepared as a part of the current program in Gaylord, and
the zoning ordinance will be a principal means of implementing
and carrying out this plan. For that reason, if for no other,
it is necessary to prepare a new zoning ordinance based upon
up-to-date information, the provisions of the land use plan,
and the newer techniques that have been developed in recent
years.
Zoning is accomplished by dividing the community into districts such as residential, commercial and industrial.

�- 46 -

The first purpose of zoning is to direct the growth of
the community in accordance with a comprehensive plan.
Since
the use of urban land is dependent upon the arrangement of
such physical facilities as highways, schools, and parks, the
zoning regulations should be a part of a plan dealing with all
of these facilities ·. . Under a good zoning ordinance, urban
growth will arrange itself according to a pattern of land use
that will fit :into a comprehensive plan,- resulting ·in maximum
benefit to the entire county.
There is a close relationship
between the land use arrangement and the provision of needed
public facilities such as schools. · For example, it is most
difficult to design a highway system in the absence of a general plan. The land use plan provides the basis for the
zoning district map.
· The second purpose of zoning is to encourage the most ·
appropriate use of land. Zoning must be reasonable.
The future · use· of property permitted must be related to the ex:i.sting
development.
In drafting an ordinance, consideration must · be
given to the character of the distrfct and its peculiar ·suitability for ·particular uses. Of greatest importance, however,
is the necessity for the regulations to encourage .the most appropriate use of land. The zoning- regulations should be based
upon the interests ·of ·the entire community - of alr the people rather than upon the value or use of one or two · individual
pieces of land. · Zoning is more than just a few rules to keep
one man from unduly damaging the value of his neighbor's ·property.
It is a directive force to encourage- the development of
the best possible community.
·
The third purpose of zoning is to provide adequate light
and air, to prevent over-crowding of the land, and to avoid
undue concentration of population. This is not too difficult
a problem in Otsego County.
The fourth purpose of zoning is to conserve and protect
property values. For example, in a residential area a few
lots might bring a much higher price if they could be used for
commercial purposes.
Such a use, however, would depreciate
rather than conserve the value of the existing buildings in
the particular area.
When there -is no zoning to prevent each individual from
doing just as he -pleas·es · with his property, the different
types of land us·e • - residence, industry and commerce· - · become
intermingled; damaging one another and the community as·a
whole. No one wants to build a residence or summer home and
then find the adjacent lot used as a soap factory or as a junk
yard.
While this is a most extreme example, there is no question but.that industrial or commer(?ial use adversely.affects

�•I
•
'•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
I
I
I
I

-

47 -

adjacent residential property.
In addition, one type of residential property has an adverse effect on another. For example, when a single-family lake residential area is invaded by
some rental cottages, the value of the single-family area for
its original purpose is reduced because, over a long period,
rental property depreciates at a faster rate than does owneroccupied property •
Existing Ordinance
As previously stated, Gaylord adopted its present zoning
ordinance in 1946. The ordinance divides the city into eight
districts:
three residential districts, one agricultural district, three commercial districts, and one industrial district.
Within each of the several districts, the use of land and
buildings is regulated, minimum setbacks are established for
front yards, and minimum rear and side yards are required.
Minimum lot areas and dimensions are specified, but there are
no height regulations; this omission indicates that the ordinance is not fully comprehensive.
In addition to the use and
area regulations, the ordinance sets out certain definitions,
adopts the zoning map by reference, and describes how district
boundaries are to be interpreted. The ordinance also provides
for enforcement of the ordinance and creates a Board of Appeals.
The present ordinance does not truly provide the desirable
controls under present-day conditions. There have been many
changes in land uses since the ordinance was adopted, and these
changing trends should be recognized.
Specifically, the following deficiencies are noted:
1.

Definitions of terms should be expanded to recognize certain new types of land use such as clinics,
modern filling stations, off-street parking and
loading spaces, motels, nursing homes, and trailers •

2.

The "R-2'' and "R-3" Residential Districts are
nearly identical and do not materially assist in
providing purposeful zoning controls. The "H-1"
and "H-2" Highway Service Districts are also nearly
identical.

3.

The area and yard regulations are scattered throughout the ordinance, in Article IV, and in the various
use districts.

4.

The ordinance does not have a section on compliance
with the regulations to make the requirements of the
ordinance clearly mandatory.

�-

48 -

s.

The residential districts permit certain· types
of institutions and other uses that =shotild o~ly
be allowed by special use permit~

6.

The ordinance does not ·contain a special use
section to provide for the proper location of
unusual land uses such as cemeteries, trailer
parks, junk yards, and similar problematic uses
that should be reviewed prior to thei~ establishment.

7.

The uses permitted in the vari·o us districts are
not well selected and do not properly relate to
one another. Also, certain commercial uses such
as retail stores, are not permitted in the "H-1"
or "H-2" Highway Service district~.

8.

The ordinance is deficient in not requiring offstreet parking to be provided in all districts
other than in the central business district.

The above are the principal defects of _the present ordinance and, while they could be remedied by amending the present
ordinance, there are so many changes which should be made the
piecemeal amendment procedure would be very cumbersome.
It is
concluded that it would be far better to draft and adopt an
entirely new ordinance than to attempt to amend the present
one.
Proposed Zoning Regulations
The text and district maps of a proposed zoning ordinance
are submitted in Appendix A. This ordinance has been coordinated and patterned to the regulations for Otsego County. The
purpose of the ordinance is to establish controls on the use
of land, the size of lots, front, side and rear yards, a minimum dwelling size, and parking space. The zoning ordinance
consists of written text and a zoning district map. (See Plate 4.)
The intent of the ordinance is to insure the general
orderly growth of the city, to insure proper development in
the future, to protect the values of land and property, and
to assure the most appropriate use of land.
Districts.
follows:

The city is -divided into five districts as
R-1
R-2
C-1
C-2
M-1

Single-Family Residence
Multiple Residence
General Commercial
Central Commercial
Manufacturing

_.!

�'
'
'
'
'
'I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

HID OE t,,,,
VALLEY

(.--

SKI

CLUB

)

t

/

- I

I

/

LJ

+ _

_j_

-

: - --1
-~ - 1

R-1

OTSEGO

COUNTY

Al RPOR.T

r-----1
KAltLANO tAlTHOlOW IW AIIIO A ))OCIATU

...

c/1• tlA11 ■ 1U, C•"11•••1111u. 1••tic..,1 .. ac11111eti

-~~~~~~=

6

.,

un. ,,o

,101i1,~
CtT'T'

.. ,uo11 u

PlANNING (O lr,M,A l~510N

GAYlOJ.0

MICHIGAN

,
I'

ZONING
ti[]

-

DISTRICT

NONCONFORMING
NONCONFORMING

MAP

COMMERCIAL USES
INDUSTRIAL USES
PLATE 4

�I
I
I

.,

I
I

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

-

49 -

Use Regulations. The R-1 Single-Family Residence District permits single-family dwellings and certain other compatible uses such as schools, parks, churches, and home occupations. The R-2 Multiple Residence District permits the uses
allowed in R-1, plus two family and multiple dwellings, clubs,
and hospitals. The C-1 General Commercial District allows
almost all types of commercial uses, including retail service
and office uses, drive-in establishments, parking facilities
and signs. The C-2 Central Commercial District applies only
to the central business area.
Permitted uses are the same as
in the C-2 District, plus wholesale establishments and terminals
and limited manufacturing. This district is exempted from
parking requirements.
The M-1 Manufacturing District allows
any type of commercial or industrial use (with the exception
of Council review of certain obnoxious uses). Residential uses
are prohibited.
Special Uses. The City Council and the planning commission may permit by special permit, cemeteries, drive-in theaters, golf courses, institutions, trailer parks, and junk yards
in certain districts where they are not regularly allowed.
Area Regulations.
All new buildings in every district
must have a minimum front yard of 25 feet except in the C-2
District. Rear yards of 25 feet and side yards of five to
ten feet are required, depending upon the district.
Side
yards are not necessary in the C-1 and C-2 districts, except
where they abut an R District.
A minimum lot of 8,500 square
feet and minimum lot width of 60 feet are required for singlefamily residential uses in the Rand C districts. Two-family
dwellings must provide 2,500 square feet and 1,500 square feet
is required for each multiple unit. Every dwelling unit is
required to have a minimum ground floor area of 480 square
feet.
These area regulations do not apply to existing buildings.
The ordinance also contains provisions for making reasonable adjustments to these regulations where there are unusual existing condi t ions. These area regulations are minimum
standards; larger lots and yards, of course, are permitted.
Any lot existing at the present time, regardless of size, may
be used as only new lots must observe these minimum areas.
Height. The height of all new buildings must not exceed
two and one-half stories or 35 feet in all districts, except
in the C-2 and M-1 districts where the maximum height is eight
stories or 100 feet for new buildings. These regulations do
not apply to existing buildings.
Board of Appeals.
Appeals may be made to an Appeal Board
for errors or for hardships. All new buildings or additions
to existing buildings must obtain a permit. Permit fees are

�- 50 $3.00 for improvements up to $2,000 in valuation, and $0.50
for each additional $1,000 -valuation. Any improvement under
$200 has no fee.
)
.!

Amendments. The City Council may amend and change the
zoning ordinance and the district maps. Before any am~ndment
may be made, the proposed amendment must ~e submitted to the
planning commission for its consideration and a public hearing.
The amendment procedure is the same as that used in adopting
the ordinance.
Subdivision Regulations
Any physical expansion of a community is primarily accomplished by the developmertt of new subdivisions of land. The
process of platting new streets, blocks and lots establishes
a pattern which firmly attaches itself to the land and thereafter is - difficult to change or alter. Therefore, it is essential that the process of subdividing land be subject to reasonable· public regulations and control so that the pattern of
development is properly related to the overall community plan.
The procedure will protect the interest of the prospective
purchaser, the developer, and the city. The creation of new
subdivisions often offers opportunities for implementing various proposals ·of the comprehensive plan such as the location
of major thoroughfares and sites for schools, parks, and other
public facilities.
Subdivision Planning
Subdivision regulations are one of the most important
tools available to implement the Comprehensive Plan of Gaylord
and to assure orderly growth in the community.- . The City of
Gaylord has the authority to control the subdivision of land
in the corporate limits and within the unincorporated territory,
as established in Michigan Statutes.
The planning commission is vested with the responsibility
of reviewing new subdivisions. This power of review is established through the adoption and enforcement of s~bdivision
regulations by the City Council. Subdivision regulations are
concerned with standards of design, standards of minimum physical improvements, the procedures to be followed, and information required to be shown on a preliminary and final plat.
It
is in the public interest · to require that the developer ·provide
certain minimum physical improvements in accordance with applicable standards of the city to prevent premature placement
of public facilities and excessive maintenance costs, as well
as to safeguard the public health and interest.

•
•
•
•
•
•

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

51 -

Upon adoption of the subdivision regulation ordinance by
the City Council, the planning commission will be required to
review each new subdivision. This offers an excellent opportunity for the city to apply sound planning principles in the
development of areas.
It is important that specific standards be available to use in appraising the merit of each proposal.
The creation of a new subdivision is usually the first
step in the development or the expansion of a residential
neighborhood.
As each parcel of land is developed, it should
be oriented to the neighborhood and must become an integral
part of it. The land use plan has identified several neighborhoods in Gaylord, the focus of which is upon a combined elementary school and neighborhood park. Future streets within the
neighborhood should be so arranged as to discourage through
traffic.
Whenever physically possible, major streets should
border the neighborhood rather than penetrate it.
In this way,
pedestrians are protected from the dangers of vehicular traffic
and residences are protected from the noise, dust, and nuisance
of through traffic.
Attention should be given to the location
of churches, clubs, lodges, public buildings, and public and
semi-public open spaces.
If these are located in the neighborhood, they should be provided with large sites, and the
buildings should be insulated from surrounding residences with
adequate setback for landscaping.
Certain basic principles of planning standards should be
observed whether a proposed subdivision is built by a single
developer or by many separate developers over a period of years.
Attention should be given to the physical characteristics of
the topography of the area under consideration. Natural features should be preserved. Minor streets should enter major
streets at right angles to avoid traffic hazards.
Wbe~ever
possible, streets should follow main drainage lines.
Dead-end
streets should be avoided, except where needed to connect to a
future development of adjacent property.
Lots should be adjusted to obtain maximum frontage on existing and proposed open
spaces.
Proposed Subdivision Regulations
The text of the proposed subdivision regulations is submitted in Appendix B. This ordinance has been coordinated and
patterned to the regulations prepared for Otsego County. This
proposed ordinance sets out in detail the procedures for the
subdivision of land. After careful review by the planning commission, the recommended regulations should then be prepared
in proper legal form by the City Attorney for adoption by the
City Council.

?'' '

�-

51 -

Upon adoption of the subdivision regulation ordinance by
the City Council, the planning commission will be required to
review each new subdivision. This offers an excellent opportunity for the city to apply sound planning principles in the
development of areas. It is important that specific standards be available to use in appraising the merit of each proposal.
The creation of a new subdivision is usually the first
step in the development or the expansion of a residential
neighborhood. As each parcel of land is developed, it should
be oriented to the neighborhood and must become an integral
part of it. The land use plan bas identified several neighborhoods in Gaylord, the focus of which is upon a combined elementary school and neighborhood park. Future streets within the
neighborhood should be so arranged as to discourage through
traffic.
Whenever physically possible, major streets should
border the neighborhood rather than penetrate it.
In this way,
pedestrians are protected from the dangers of vehicular traffic
and residences are protected from the noise, dust, and nuisance
of through traffic. Attention should be given to the location
of churches, clubs, lodges, public buildings, and public and
semi-public open spaces.
If these are located in the neighborhood, they should be provided with large sites, and the
buildings should be insulated from surrounding residences with
adequate setback for landscaping.

I

i -

Certain basic principles of planning standards should be
observed whether a proposed subdivision is built by a single
developer or by many separate developers over a period of years.
Attention should be given to the physical characteristics of
the topography of the area under consideration. Natural features should be preserved. Minor streets should enter major
streets at right angles to avoid traffic hazards.
Whenever
possible, streets should follow main drainage lines. Dead-end
streets should be avoided, except where needed to connect to a
future development of adjacent property.
Lots should be adjusted to obtain maximum frontage on existing and proposed open
spaces.
Proposed Subdivision Regulations
The text of the proposed subdivision regulations is submitted in Appendix B. This ordinance has been coordinated and
patterned to the regulations prepared for Otsego County. This
proposed ordinance sets out in detail the procedures for the
subdivision of land. After careful review by the planning commission, the recommended regulations should then be prepared
in proper legal form by the City Attorney for adoption by the
City Council.

�I
I

'
'
'
'I
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'I
I
I
I

- 53 -

PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION
Administration of the Plan
The preparation of a comprehensive plan is the responsibility of the City Planning Commission, with the support of the
citizens of the city and the adoption and enforcement of the
plan by the City Council and city officials. The ·planning commission, however, as the sponsor of the plan and advisor to the
city authorities, should continue to review all matters affecting physical development of the ~ity and should remain active
in promoting the plan in the community.
·
The completion and adoption of the comprehensive plan
are only the very beginning steps and not the end of the planning program. The plan itself is merely a blueprint for the
orderly, efficient, and attractive community which Gaylord
strives to be in the future.
The task remains to actually
bring into being this planned community.
This can be accomplished through careful guidance and direction of the many
day-to-day activities affecting the physical city and to
gradually carry out the various improvements proposed in the
plan. The plan is of little or no value unless it is followed
and its recommendations are carried out in the ensuing years.
Following its completion, the plan must be · adopted by the City
Planning Commission, kept up to date and thereafter periodically reappraised and revised when necessary to meet changing
conditions.
It is not too great a task to prepare a planning
program; to preserve the plan's integrity and to consistently
carry out its proposals is much more difficult.
Into the development of each parcel of private property
and into the planning for each project, must necessarily go a
significant number of detailed considerations on the part of
many individuals and groups. Throughout the next 20 years,
countless decisions of this type will be made. No single
group in a given time can possibly foresee the . ramifications
of all these many decisions.
Many will affect the improvements
on the recommendation of the comprehensive plan. The plan,
consequently, will require changes and modifications in the
future so that it always represents the latest and best thinking for the future development of the city. In any event, the
basic principles set forth in the plan will remain valid. Both
public and private improvements must be coordinated with some
single, overall scheme if a satisfactory community is to be
created in Gaylord.

�IJ
II

I

- 55 -

4.

Establishment of Permanent Citizen Committee.
An active citizen committee which would remain as
a permanent organization can be of much value in
a long-range planning program. By establishing a
permanent committee, the will of the community
would thus be represented and expressed. The intelligent understanding and wide representation
of such an organization can consolidate public
opinion and favor in developing the city in a
truly democratic manner along the principles established by the comprehensive plan. This committee would not be required to provide excessive
time, but rather would meet several times a year
to review broad planning goals and to provide the
commission with citizen assistance.

5.

Publication of a Summary Report. Publication and
distribution of the comprehensive plan is the first
important means of familiarizing the public with
the commission's activities. The mere printing of
the plan in its entirety will not, however, be adequate means of securing public understanding. Many
people will not read such a report and many will
not remember the large amount of data and recommendations contained therein.
It is essential that an
educational program of a more visual nature be presented.
A summary brochure of the plan, presented
in this manner, should be prepared for wide-scale
distribution •

6.

Publicity Program. The planning commission should
inaugurate a publicity program within the near future.
It is recommended that a publicity committee
be appointed, consisting of several members of the
commission and an interested citizen. Educational
activities must be continued in succeeding years,
for a single program even though intensive, is
quickly forgotten.
The planning commission should
publish annual reports as well as any special studies
of city-wide interest which it may undertake. These
reports should clearly present accomplishments that
have been made under the comprehensive plan and
through capital improvement programs.

I.J
IJ

•I
•
•I
•
•I
•
•

City Council Program
The City Council, as the legislative body of the municipal government, has the final responsibility for all planning
in the .c ommunity. The City Planning Commission is an advisory
body and can only make recommendations to the City Council. It

�I
- 54Immediate Objectives for Planning Implementation
In order for the planning program in Gaylord to become a
reality so that it can actually serve as a guide for future
development, certain major steps must be initiated by the City
Planning Commission and the City Council in the near future.
These important steps are ,. essential, immediate objectives.
These five major steps are- reviewed in the following.
It is
the . responsibility of the City Planning Commission to initiate
these immediate objectives.
1.

Adoption of the Comprehensive Plan. __The first and
most important step is the adoption of the comprehensive plan, upon which all of the other actions
and programs of the city to guide the future devel~
opment are based.
The City Planning Commission
should pursue the adoption of the plan, following
review of the preliminary reports by the commission
and the citizen advisory committees. The commission should officially and formally adopt the plan
and forward it to the City Council.

2~ ,

Recommendation of Regulatory Ordinances. The City
of Gaylord does not presently have any control
over the -development of subdivisions within the ·
city.
It is imperative that the proposed subdivis.ion regulations, as submitted, be reviewed by
the planning commission, adopted by the commission
and forwarded to the City Council so that these
regulations become a city ordinance through official adoption by the council.
Recommendations were made for the revision of the
zoning ordinance. The revised text and district
map should be reviewed by _ the planning commission
and forwarded to the City Council with the recommendation that these zoning regulations be officially adopted as a city ordinance.

3.

Recommendation on a Capital Improvement Program.
The comprehensive plan outlined an extensive number
of public improvements that should be developed by
the city during the next - twenty years. The development of these public improvements should start
-immediately so that they are developed gradually
. over a period of y.e ars. Therefore, it is · imperative that the city undertake a sound program for
capital improvements. The planning commission
should refine the capital improvement program and
forward it to the City Council recommending its
execution.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I
;I

I
I

�IJ

II
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

•I

•
•I
•
•
•
•

-

57 -

plan and recognize its advantages.
No matter how effective
the legal procedures that are made available for carrying out
the program, the administration cannot be completely successful unless the plan is understood by and has the support of
the public.
It is suggested that the following measures be
employed by the City Planning Commission and the City Council
to insure and obtain greater public understanding and support
of the planning program.
Publication and distribution of the comprehensive plan is
the first important means of familiarizing the public with the
commission's activities. The mere printing of the plan in its
entirety will not, however, be adequate means of securing public understanding.
It is essential that an educational program
of a more visual nature be presented.
A summary brochure of
the plan, presented in this manner, should be prepared for a
wide-scale distribution.
Slides, displays in retail stores,
talks before audiences, and newspaper stories are all effective means of apprising the public of the facts and advantages
of the plan.
A study of the comprehensive plan could be included as
a part of the school curriculum in Gaylord. This is particularly desirable in the junior and senior high school; even the
older elementary school pupils can be properly advised about
certain phases of the planning work •
Educational activities must be continued in succeeding
years, for a single program even though intensive, is quickly
forgotten.
The planning commission should publish annual reports as well as any special studies of city-wide interest
which it may undertake. These reports should clearly present
accomplishments that have been made under the comprehensive
plan and through capital improvement programs •
An active citizens' committee that would remain as a permanent organization can be of much value in a long-range planning program. By establishing a permanent committee, the will
of the community would thus be represented and expressed. The
intelligent understanding and wide representation of such an
organization can consolidate public opinion and favor in developing the city in a truly democratic manner along the concepts established by the comprehensive plan •

�- 56 -

I
I

is ther.e fore - essential that the Council pursue a p:togram in
order to make effective use of the comprehensive plan. A
program pertaining to plann_ing is outlined· in t _h e following:
1.

Adoption of the Plan. Following refinemeJ?.t and
adoption of the comprehensive plan by the City
Planning Commission, the commission would forward
the plan· to the City Council. This plan will
represent the combined thinking of the planning
commission members, the consultants, and interested citizens.
It i~ the responsibility of the
. City Council to adopt the plan as a public document to serve the present and future city councils.

2.

Adoption of Regulatory Measures. Following action
by th~ planning commission, the City Council should
pr9ce.e d with the adoption of the revised zoning
ordinance and the propos~d subdivisi6n regulations.
These municipal ordinances are necessary for the
City Council to properly control and guide future
private development.

3.

Initiation of a Bond Issue.
A capital improvement
program, based upon the comprehensive plan, should
be forwarded to the City Council by the planning
commission. The City Council should carefully review the proposed program, revise and modify it
according to their judgment of local needs, and
initiate a bond issue for its execution. Gaylord
has many pressing needs for public improvements.
A delay in providing these improvements will only
create a greater burden for the community in the
future.

4.

Initiation of Downtown Projects. Many improvements
to privat~ structures have been made in Gaylord's
business district in recent years. The city should
follow this local interest with needed parking areas
as recommended in the comprehensive' plan.
Also, the
city should proceed with further studies of the proposed · city:-count°y building.
Public Understanding and Support

Planning is a democratic process; to be effective, it
should have the understanding and support of the citizens of
the community.
While all technical details may not be grasped
by all of the people, the objectives and aims of the plan and
its principal proposals_ should be sufficiently publicized so
that the public as a whole can see the reasonableness of the

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

�(

I

'I
I
I
I
I

11

APPENDIX A"

PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE
GAYLORD, MICHIGAN

I
I
Prepared for the

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
by

HARLAND BARTHOLOMEW AND ASSOCIATES
Saint Louis, Missouri

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section

. . . . . •••
.......•

1

_P urpose • • •

2

Exemptions • •

3

Definitions • • • • • • • • • • • •

4

Interpretation and Conflict • • • •

5

Districts. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A-8

6

Compliance with the Regulations • • • • • • • • A-9

7

R-1 Single-Family Residence District • • • • • A-9

8

R-2 Multiple Residence District • •

9

C-1 General Commercial District • • •

•

• • • •

.... .. .

.

.

. . . .
. . . ..

...

A-1
A-1

• A-2
• A-7

• • • A-12

...

• • A-13

. .

A-16

10

C-2 Central Commercial District • •

11

M-1 Manufacturing District • •

. . . . . . . . A-18

12

Off-Street Parking Regulations

. . . . .

13

Special Use Regulations • • • • • • • • • • • • A-22

14

Nonconforming Uses • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A-25

15

Supplementary Height and Area Regulations • • • A-26

16

Board of Appeals • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • A-29

17

Amendments

18

Penalties.

19

Validity.

..

.

.. . ... . . .... . . • •
................ .•
. . . . ... . . . . . . . .. . •

A-19

A-33
A-33
A-34

�!!.....,

---- -

r

r
r
f

-f

-I
I
I
I
·I
! '

PROPOSED ZONING ORDINANCE
CITY OF GAYLORD, MICHIGAN
This Ordinance is intended - to continue the general orderly
growth of this City, to insure proper development , in the future,
to protect the values of land and property, and to assure the
most appropriate use of land. The Ordinance is designed to allow
the continuance of any existing use in the City.
PREAMBLE
The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Gaylord is to promote
the health, safety, morals and general welfare, and to
protect the rights of individual property owners; to regulate and restrict the height, number of stories and size
of buildings and other structures, the percentage of lot
which may be occupied, the size of yards, courts, and
other open spaces, the density of population, the location
and use ·of buildings, structures and land for trade, industry, residence and other purposes; and for the said purposes
to divide the =City of Gaylord, Michigan into districts of
such number, shape and area as are deemed best suited to
carry out the said purposes; to provide a method for its
administration and enforcement and to provide penalties
for its violation .
The City Council of Gaylord, Michigan, does ordain as
follows:
SECTION 1.

PURPOSE

AN ORDINANCE to establish zoning districts and provisions
for Gaylord, Michigan, including the administration thereof, in
accordance with the provisions of Act 207 of the Public Acts of
1921, as amended:
BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of Gaylord, Michigan:
This Ordinance shall be known and may be cited and referred
to as the Zoning Ordinance of the City of Gaylord.
SECTION 2.

EXEMPTIONS

The erection, construction, alteration or maintenance by
public utilities or municipal departments or commissions, of
overhead or underground gas, electrical, · steam or water, distribution or transmission systems, collection, communication,
s~pply or disposal systems, including mains, drains, sewers,
pipes, conduits, wires, cables, fire alarm boxes, police call
boxe~, traffic signals, hydrants, towers, poles, electrical substations, gas regulator stations, and other similar equipment
and accessories in connection therewith, reasonably necessary

�A-2
for the furnishing of icieqfrate service :by such public utility or
municipal department or COfil.!llission or for the public health or
safety or general :. ~~~;fare' / ''shall . be permitted as authorized or
regulated by law and other ordinances of the City of Gaylord in
3:ny use district, i _t _.being the · int~nticm -:hereof to except such
e~ection, construction, al~eration, and.~aintenance from the
. ~ppli_cation of° this Ordinance. ·
· .r_: ,; , -.
SECTION 3.

DEFI.NITIONS

For the purpose of this Ordinance, certain terms and . words
are to be construed and are defined as follows:
.

.

.

Words used in . the present tense include the future; words
in the singular - include the plural number~ and words in the
. plural nu~ber- ·i11-clude the singular number: · the word "building"
:i,ncludes the_ word "structure"; the word ·"shall" •is mandatory
and not directory .
. . Accessory Building - A subordinate building, the use of
-~~ich . is _incidental to and customary -in connection with the
·principal building or use, and which is located on the same lot
with such principal building or use.
··. •,
..

Accessory Use - ~ subordinate use which -is incidental to
and customary in connection with the principal building or use
and which is located on the same lot with such principal building or u_s e.
Alley - A public or private thoroughfare which affords only
a secondary means of access to abutting property.
Basement - That part of a bu:i,.lding having -at least two feet
l?ut not more than one-half of its height below the average grade
.o f the adjoining ground.
·
Billboard - A sign which directs attention to a business,
_commodity, service or _entert~inment conducted, sold or offered
eisewhere than upon the same lot.
Boarding -House - A building, other .than a hotel or apartment
hotel where, for compensation and by prearrangement for definite
periods, lodging, meals, or _ lodging and :_me:als are provided for
three or more persons, but not exceeding 20 persons.
•

I

.'

•

Building - Any structure having a roof supported by columns
. or. walls for the shelter or enclosure . ofr persons or. property •
. Building, Height of - -The. =vertical .d±stance from the grade
to (a) the highest point of a flat .roof, . (b) . the average height
between eaves and ridge for gable, hip and gambrel roofs, ·or
(c) the deck line of a mansard roof.

�•
•II
•
•II
•
•d
•
•
•

I
A-3
Buildable Width - The width of the : lot left to be built
upon after the side yards are provided.
Cellar - That part of a building having more than one-half
of its height below the average grade of .the ~a~joining ground.
Clinic - An establishment where patients are not lodged
overnight, but are admitted for examination and treatment by
a group of physicians or dentists practicing medicine together.
Club - Buildings and facilities owned or operated by a
corporation, association, person or persons for a s·ocial, educational or recreational purpose, but not primarily for profit
and not primarily to render a service which is customarily
carried on as a business.
District - Any section of the City of Gaylord within which
the zoning regulations are uniform.
·
Dwelling - A building or portion thereof designed or used
exclusively for residential occupancy, but ·not including house
trailers, mobile homes, hotels, motels, boarding and lodging
houses, tourist courts or tourist homes.
·
·
Dwelling, Single-Family - A building designed for _or occupied exclusively by one family.
· ,:
Dwelling, Two-Family - A building designed for or occupied
exclusively by two families ·.
Dwelling, Mtlltiple - A building designed for or occupied
exclusively by three or more families.
· Dwelling Unit - A room or suite of rooms used as a singlefamily dwelling, including bath and culinary accommodations.
Family - An individual or two or more persons . related by
blood or marriage, or a group of not more than five persons who
need not be related by blood or marriage, living together as a
single housekeeping unit in a dwelling.
Filling or Service Station - Any land, building, structure
or premises used for the sale at retail of motor vehicle fuels,
oils or accessories or for servicing or lubricating motor vehicles or installing ' or repairing -parts and accessories, but not
including the rep·a iring or replacing ·of· . motors, bod"ies, or · fenders of motor vehicles or painting motor vehicles, and excluding
public garages.
·
Floor Area - The square feet of floor space within the outside line of walls and includes the total of all space on all
floors of_a building. It does not include porches, garages,
or space in a basement or cellar when said basement or cellar
space is used for storage or incidental uses.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I

I
I

�I

I
A-4

'
'
''I
I

I

L

'~

L

t

. Fro'ntage - The distance along a· st:feet .· l:LneLfrom one intersecting street to an6ther oi from 6rie in~eis~~iing street
to the end, of a_ dead-end street.
Garage I Pi-1.vate - A detached a·c cessory bt.il.ldfng or portion of a main building housing the automobiles of the occupants of the premises~ ·
· · ,,
'i

:

··

Garage, Publi'c ~ -A building or· porti-on thereof·, other than
a private or storage garage, designed or used for equipping,
servicing, repairi:ng, · hiring, selling, storing or parking
motor~driven ~ehicl~s.· Th~ term repairing shall not include
an auto~otive bodj repair shop nor ' the rebuilding, dismahtling
or storage of wrecked or junked vehicles;
Grade - The average level of the finished surface of the
ground for buildings more than five feet from a street line.
For buildings closer than five feet to a street line, the
grade is the sidewalk elevation at the center of the building _. If there is more than· one street,- -an average s ;i _d ewalk
elevati_o n is to be used. If there is nci sid·e walk, the Cfty
Engineer shall establish · the sidewalk grade. The average ·
level of the water where buildings or structures are erected
thereon.
Home Occupation - Any occupation within a dwelling and
clearly incidental thereto carried on by a member of the
family residing on the premises; provided that no person not
a resident on the premises is employed, no stock in trade is
kept or commodities sold, no mechanical equipment is used,
except such that is normally used -f or pure.ly . domestic or
household purposes, no adve.rtising sign is displayed other
than a name plate not exceeding one square foot in area and
there is no other exterior indication that the building_is
being used for any purpose other than · a dwelling.
Housekeeping Cabin Park '- A parcel ' of -land on which two
or more buildings; ten·t s or similar -s tructures are maintained,
offered or used for · dwelling or sleeping quarters for tran-·.
sients, but shall not include boarding and lodging houses,
tourist homes or motels.
;
In~titutiort· - A nonprofit est~bli~hment for public use~
Junk Yard -• -The use of premises for ' the · open--· storage of
old and dilapida~ed ·automobiles·, · trucks, tractors and other
such vehicles and . parts thereof, . wagons, · and other kinds of·
vehicles and parts thereof, scrap building material, scrap · .
contractors' equipment,
.
.; . ' . tanks, cases, cans, barrels, boxes,
::

;

�•
•
•
•ii
•
I."
,.
•..
•
•:.
,.
'

I

A-5
drums, piping, bottles, glass, old. iron, · machinery; rags,
paper, excelsior, hair, mattresses, . beds or bedding or any
other kind of scrap or waste material.
Lodging or Rooming House - Same as . "Boarding II~u~;e''.
Lot - (1) A parcel of land adequate for occupanc~ by
a useherein permitted, providing the yards, area and offstreet parking herein required and fronting directly on a
street.
0

(2) Land occupied or intended for occupancy by
a use permitted in this Ordinance, including one main building, together with its accessory buildings and the yards,
loading and parking spaces required herein, and having its
principal frontage upon a street or upon an officially approved place.

!

Lot, Corner - A lot abutting upon two or more streets
at their intersection.

I

Lot. Depth - The -mean horizontal distance between the
front and rear lot lines.

L

,

1.

I

11111
I

I

Lot, Interior - A lot other than a corner lot.
Lot of Record - A lot which is part of a· subdivision, the
map of wbich has been recorded in the Office of the Regi~ter of
Deeds of Otsego County; or a parcel of land, the deed of which
was recorded in the Office of the Register of Deeds of Otsego
County.
Lot, Through (double-frontage) - An interior lot having
frontages on two streets.
Lot, Width - The width of a lot at the front yard line •
Motel (Motor Court, Motor Hotel, Motor Lodge) - A building or buildings in which lodging or boarding and lodging are
provided and offered to the public for compensation. As such,
it is open to the public in contradistinction to a boarding
house, a lodging house or a multiple dwelling which are herein separately defined.
Nonconforming Use - The lawful use of land or a building,
or a portion thereof, which use does not conform with the use
regulations of the district in which it is located.
Nursing Home - A home for the aged, or infirm in which
three or more persons not of the immediate family are received, kept or provided with food and shelter or care for

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I

-

�,--

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

A-6
compensation·;· but not including hospitals, clinics . or similar
institutions .devoted primarily to the diagnosis .and treatment
of the sick or injured.
Parking Space. Off-Street - An all-weather, surfaced area
not in a street or alley and having an area of not less than
180 square: feet -, exclusive of driv.eways, permanently reserved
for · the . temporary storage of one automobile .- and connected with
a street or alley by an all-weather surfaced driveway which
affords ingress and egress for an automobile without requiring
another automobile to be moved.
Porte-cochere - A canopy attached to a building and ex- ..
tending over ·a driveway, open on. all sides except for the wall
of the main building.
Premises - A lot together with all buildings and structures thereon.
Sign - An identification, description, illustration, or
device which is affixed to, or represented directly or indirectly upon a building, structure or land and which directs
attention to a product, place, activity, person, institution
or business.
Stor_y - That portion of a building, other than a basement,
included between the surface of any floor and the surface of
the floor next above -it; o.r if there be no · floor ·a bove it, then
the space between such floor and the ceiling next above it.
Story, Half - A space under a sloping roof which has the
line of intersection of roof decking and wall face not more
than three feet above the top floor ·level, and in which .space
not more than two-thirds of the floor area ·1s finished off for
use. A half-story containing independent apartments or living
quarters -shall be counted as a full story.
Street ,- A -public thoroughfare which affords -the principal
means of access· to abutt1ng property. ·
. Street · Line
ous. street.

A dividing line between a lot and a contigu-

Structure - Anything constructed or erected~ the use of
which requires permanent location on the ground-o~ attached
to something having a permanent · locatio·n . on the grouncf;· · including, but without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
advertising signs, billboards, backstops for tennis courts and
pergolas.
•., ·.

�I

I
I
,1
,·

I
I
]

I
I
I
I
I
I

,
l'I
'l

I
I
I
I
_11

A-7-

Structural Alteration - Any change except those required
by law or ordinance, which would prolong the life of the supporting members of a building or structure, such as bearing
walls, columns, beams or girders, not including openings in
bearing walls as permitted by other ordinances.
Tourist Home - An establishment used for dwelling purposes in which rooms, with or without meals, are offered to
transient guests for compensation.
Trailer or Mobile Home - A vehicle used for living purposes and standing or designed to stand on wheels or rigid
supports.
Trailer Park or Mobile Home Court - An area where one
or more trailers can be or are intended to be parked, designed or intended to be -used as living facilities for one
or more families.
Yard - An open space, other than a court, on a lot, unoccupied and unobstructed from the ground upward, except as
otherwise provided in this Ordinance.
Yard, -Front - A yard across the full width of the lot
extending from the front line of the building to the front
street line of the lot.
Yard, Rear - A yard extending the full width of the lot
between a principal building and the rear lot line.
Yard, Side - A yard on the same lot with the building
between the main building and the adjacent side of the lot
and extending from the front yard to the rear yard thereof.
SECTION 4.

INTERPRETATION AND CONFLICT

The provisions of this Ordinance shall be held to be
minimum requirements adopted to promote the health, safety,
morals, comfort, prosperity and general welfare of the people
of the City of Gaylord, Michigan.
It is not intended by this Ordinance to repeal, abrogate,
annul, impair or interfere with any existing easement, covenants, or agreements between parties, or with any rules, regulations, or permits previously adopted or issued pursuant to
law; provided, however·, that where this Ordinance imposes a
greater restriction upon the use of buildings or premises, or
upon the height of a building, or requires larger open spaces
than are required by other rules, regulations or permits, or
by easements, covenants or agreements, the provisions of this
Ordinance shall govern.

I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I

I
I

I

I

I

I

I

�,...-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,,.

I

I
I
I

A-8
.~EQJI ON 5.

DISTRICTS

. .' i .- In order to carry out the . provisions of this Ordinance,
the _C;i ty. of Gay~ord is hereby -.divided into five districts which
shall be known as :
:·'

R-1
.R-2
C-1
C-2
M-1

Single-Family Residence_District
Multiple Res:ldence .D istridi~--·General Commercial District
Central Commercial District
Manufacturing District

2. The districts and boundaries of districts are .shown
on the maps attached hereto and made a part of this Ordinance.
The map . shall be designated .as the "District Map".
All
notations ~nd J'.eferences ·shown ·o n the . "District Map" are as
much a part of this Ordinance as though specifically described
herein.
·
.a. The district bound~ries are either . streets, highways or alleys .unless otherwise shown~ . and where the
designation on the "District Map" indicates that the
various districts are approximately bounded by a
street, highway, _or _alley .line, such strE?et, _highway,
,or alley line shall be construed to be the district ·
boundary line.
b. _Where the _district .poundaries are not otherwise
indicated, and where the property h~s been -or may
hereafter be divided into blocks and lots, the dis.trict boundaries shall be construed to be lot lines
and where 0the designations , qn the "District Map" are
. •) . approximately bound_e d . by lot lines, said lot lines
shall be construed to~e the boundary of the district.

.;,

.. I

I/
-~

II

'

,
III
'
a,,
~

I

c. In unsubdivided property, ·the district boundary
lines shown . on the "Distri.ct -Map" . shall _Qe determined
by. use of the scale shown on such map •.
d. In the event any street, highway, alley, drainageway or other public way forming the boundary of a dis. trict is .vacated, the new _d istrict boundary shall be
the former qenterline of .~aid .vacated street, :,highway,
alley, drainageway or other . public way •
.. 3 • . All . t~r-r i tory which may . hereaftej;. pec~me a . part of
th~ City of Gaylord -by incorporation ~hall .automatically be
classified in .the R-:'i · Single_-Fami,:iy Residence District until
appropriately. l:'ecJassi:fied in accordance with the provisions
of Section 17 o:( this Ordina.nce:

•

�]I

...

1JI•
1I.•
'

·l

·•
•
•
•
•
•

1 11

•
•
•:I

A-9

4. In the event the District Map does not show the
zoning of any area within the ·City of Gay"iord, such area
automatically shall be classified in the R-1 Single-Family
Residence District until a reasonable time following discovery of the omission, the area shall be appropriately
classified in accordance with the provisions of Section 17
of this Ordinance.
SECTION 6.

COMPLIANCE WITH THE REGULATIONS

Except as hereinafter specifically provided:
1. No building or structure shall be erected, converted,
enlarged, reconstructed, moved or structurally altered, nor
shall any building or land be used, except for a purpose permitted in the district in which the building or land is located.
2. No building or structure shall be erected, converted,
enlarged, reconstructed or structually altered to exceed the
height and bulk limit herein established for the district in
which the building is located.
3. No building or structure shall be erected, converted,
enlarged, reconstructed, or structurally altered, except in
conformity with the yard, floor area, and lot area regulations
of the district in which the building is located.

4. No building shall be erected, or structurally altered
to the extent specifically provided · hereinafter except in conformity with the off-street parking and loading regulations
of the district in which the building is located.
5. The minimum yards, parking space, and other open
spaces, including lot area per family, required by this Ordinance, for any building hereafter erected or structurally altered, shall not be encroached upon or considered as parking,
yard, or open space or lot area requirements for any other
building, nor shall any lot area be reduced beyond the district requirements of this Ordinance •.
6. Every building hereafter erected or structurally
altered shall be located on a lot as herein defined and in
no case shall there be more than one main building on one
lot except as specifically provided hereinafter in Section
15.

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

SECTION 7. R-1 SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCE DISTRICT

I

1. The regulations set forth in this Section or set forth
elsewhere in this Ordinance, when referred to in this Section
are the regulations in the R-1 Single-Family Residence District.

I

�I
I
I
I
I

I

I

I

I
I
I

A--10

·2 ·. Use Regulations. N building· or prelllises_ shall be used
only_-~or tµe following ~ti_f P:?ses ~'
,.
a~ . s·ingle_;family ~\\;~'11ings.
.,

b. ' Publ"ic sbhools, elementary and high, or private or
parochial schools having a curriculum similar to a
public elementary
school
high school.
.
.
.or · public
. ' .
.

c. Parks, playgrounds and community buildings owned or
operated by public agencies.
d. · Farining and truck gardening, ·except fur and stock
farms and farms operated for the disposal of garbage,
rubbish or offal~
e. Country club or golf course, except a miniature
course or prac~ice . driving ;y~e operated. ~or comme_rcial
purposes.
·
~", , :;;

f.

Churches · and temples.

g. Accessory buildings and accessory uses customarily
incident to the above uses, but not involving the coµduct · of a business. Acces·sory uses to a dwelling· in:... · ·
elude, but are not linii ted to, a home occupation, ··- pr1vate g-arage, a swimming pool for the use of the fam'ily
and their guests.
h.

Home occupations.

i. Temporary signs · pertaining to the lease, hire, or
sale of a building or parcel, not exceeding eight square
feet in gross surfa_c e area.
j. Chtirch or publiri bulletib boards not ~xceed~ng twenty
square f~et in gross surfa~e are~. :: .. ..
__

,;

· 3. Height Regulations. ·. Buildings arid 'structures shall
exceed neither 35 feet,· · nor two and one-half stories in height
except as provided in Section 15 of this Ordjnance.
4~

·Area Re~ul~tions.
a.

Front Yard:
(1)
There shall be cl: front yard having a depth
of not less than 25 feet, · except as provided in
Section 15 of this Ordinance.

I

�_.
j

1•
1•
1•

A-11.

(2) Where lots have ,double frontage, the required front yard shall
·provided on both
streets.

be

's

(3) On corner lots, there shall be. a front
yard on both streets. On corner lots that
were under separate ownership on the effective date of this Ordinance, the buildable
width shall not be reduced to less than 35
feet, except that there shall be a yard along
the side street side of such a lot, of at
least 10 feet, as well as the required interior
side yard.

•

.~

1•

•:.
•,.
•

b.

Side Yard:
(1) Except as hereinafter provided _in the following paragraph and in Section 15 of this Ordinance, there shall be a side yard on each side
of a building having a width of not less than
10 feet.
(2) Wherever a lot of record, on the effective date of this Ordinance has a width of
less than 50 feet, each side yard may be reduced to a width of not less than ~O percent
of the width of the lot, but in no instance
shall it be less than five feet.

c.

Rear Yard:

Except as hereinafter provided in Section 15
of this Ordinance, there shall be a rear yard having· a depth of not less than 25 feet.
d.

Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width:
(1) Every lot shall have an area of not less
than 8,500 and a minimum width of 60 feet.

•
•
•
•,ll

(2) Any lot which has less area or width than
herein required and was held under separate
ownership on the effective date of this Ordinance, may be occupied by any use permitted
in this district.
e.

Minimum Floor Area:

Every dwelling shall have a minimum ground
floor area of not less than 480 square feet.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I

�I
I
I
I
I
I

I

'I
I
I
I
I
I
II

I

I
I
II

f.

Off... Street Parking-:

Off-street parking spaces shall be provided in
accordance with requirements for specific uses set
forth in Section 12 of this Ordinance.
SECTION 8. -. R-2 MULTIPLE RES I-DENCE DISTRICT
; l. The regulations set forth in this Section or set
forth elsewhere - iri this Ordinance when referred to in this
Section are the regulations in the R-2 Multiple Residence
District;
2. Use Regulations. A building or premises shall be
used only for the following purposes:

a. Any. use permitted in the R-1 Single..:Family Residence District. ·
b.

Multiple dwellings.

c.

Lodging houses or boarding houses.

d.

Apartment hotels.-

.,.

e. Hospitals, nursing or convalescent homes, and institutions, but not a penal or ment_a l institution.
f.

Private clubs, fraternities, sororities, or lodges.

g. A physician, surgeon or dentist may have office space
within his residence ·f or consul tat ion or treatment of
patients · provided -that no more -thari one--third of the
floor area of such dwelling unit is used for office space.

h. Storage garage when· accessory'. to a permitted building
or use.
•J

.-

• :

i. · Usual accessory uses •
. · 3. Height Regulations. Buildings and structures shall
exceed neither 35 feet, nor- two and •ohe-half stories in height
except as provided in Section· lS- of· this Ordinance.
4.

Area Regulations.
a.

Front Yard:

The front yard regulations are the same as those
in the R-1 District.

�l'u

A-13
b.

•
I

Side Yard:

(1)
Except as hereinafter provided in the following paragraph and in Section 15 of this Ordinance,
there shall be a si_de yard on each side of a building, having a width of not less than five feet.

c.

Rear Yard:

The rear yard regulations are the .same• as those
in the R-1 District.
d.

Minimum Lot Area and Lot Widths:

Every building hereafter erected or structurally
altered for dwelling purposes shall comply with the
following lot area requirements.
(1) Single-family dwelling; 5,000 square
feet and a minimum width of 60 feet.
(2) Two-family dwellings; 2,500 ·s quare
feet per family and a minimum width of 60
feet.
(3) Multiple dwellings; 2,500 square feet
per family and a minimum width of 50 feet.
Any lot which has less than herein required
and was held under separate ownership at the
effective date of this Ordinance may ·be- occupied by any use permitted in this : district •
. e.

Minimum Floor Area:

Every dwelling shall have a minimum ground floor
area of not less than 480 .square feet.
f.

Off-Street Parking:

Off-street parking spaces shall be provided in
accordance with requirements for specific uses set
out in Section 12 of this Ordinance.
SECTION 9. C-1 GENERAL COMMERCIAL DISTRICT

1. The regulations set forth in this Section, or set
forth elsewhere in this Ordinance, when referred to in this
Section, are the regulations of the C-1 General Commercial
District.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

A-14

2. Use Regulations. A building or ·premises shall be
used only for the following purpo~es:
-.-•·

.-

.. , .a • . Advertising·sign or b:i:11b6'.ard}'when located at least
···'

, ;· ;50:

r

·

r

f~et:, ·f rom any "R" Di5.t'r'fc·,:~·
·

' ,!

•

'

: ·

.

i

I : .

: • · ! ·.

·: . •. :. •...

~- ·,'

b. Parking or public garages, and auto, truck, trailer,
and boat sales, service, storage;.. ·parts, repair, washing
or painting shop provided that any outdoor storage of
parts ·, material or damaged: autos, trucks, trailers or
boats shall be suitably screened or fenced or enclosed
and such storage shall not be conducted within a required
yard.
c. Auto parking or sales·lots for new or used cars provided that dismantled or junked cars · unfit for operation
on the highways shall not be stored on the premises unless within a building.
d.

Business or- commercial schools.

e. Dance halls, bowling alleys/ and: similar places of
amusement or entertainment.
·
f. Restaurants and coffee shops, including drive-in
restaurants. ··
The o:ffice and display room of home repair contractors
such as- heating, · painting, roof'i-ng and d~corating contractors · provided the business is entirely within a completely; enclosed building, there is no· storage of supplies
or equipment on the premises outside the building, and
no more than 50 percent of the .. gross floor area is used
for processing and fabricating.

,-g~·

.

. .

.(

- : . ~- i .. ·

h. Drive-in establishments bf:f'er•ing 'goods or services to
customers
waiting in parke_
d a~tomobiles
•.
.
. ,, -: . -; . i ~.. •
.
. • .. '. •
~

i.

-

~

.

·- ·

Theatres, including outdoor
or drive-in
theatres.
.
~

•.

j.
Display rooms for merchandise' to b,e sold at wholesale
where merchandise is stored elsewhere.

k. Printing shops having a saies office or retail outlet
on the premises and having less than 10,000 square feet
of floor area.
·
1. · Radio· or television ·broadc·a sting stations, studios

and offices.

I

t.f1
I

r

�A-15
m. Repair services or businesses, including repairing
of bicycles, radios, television sets, and other home
appl~ances, typewriters, watches, clocks, and shoes,
having a retail outlet on the premises and having no
more than 10,000 square feet of floor area.

•
~

,I~

1•

•~·
~
•
J,

!

I ~

I

n.

Monument works having a retail outlet on the premises •

o. General service and repair establishments similar in
character to uses listed herein.
p.

Hotels and motels.

q.

Farm implement display and sales rooms.

r. Veterinarian or animal hospital or riding academy
provided that no such building, kennel, or exercise
runway shall be closer than 50 feet to any "R" District.
s.

Tire sales and service .

t. Other retail stores and outlets similar in character
to uses listed herein.
u.

Frozen food lockers.

v. A.ccessory buildings and uses customarily incident to
the above .uses.
3. Height Regulations. Buildings and structures shall
exceed neither 35 feet, nor two and one~half,~· stories in height,
except as provided in Section 15 of .this ._ Ordinance.
4.

Area Regulations.

a.

Front Yard:

The front yard regulations are the same as those in
the R-2 District.

~

b.

Side Yard:

No side yard shall be required for non-residential
buildings except that a seven-foot side yard shall be
required on the side of a lot or tract adjoining a residence district. Side yards for dwellings shall be not
less than six feet.
:

I

~
.,.
.

"

-...J

•.: }

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

'

I
I

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I

'I
I
I

~

I

'
~

A-16
. c. . Rear Yard .:

.

,.,;

..
'·

The rear yartj regulations are the same as those in
the R-2 D;i.strict..
..,
. :·
d.

Minimum Lot Area and Lot Width:
.

•·

..

The lot area regulations are the same as those in
the R~2 District except ,that no-minimum lot Width is
required.
e.

Minimum Floor Area:

·. i · ,·

Every dwelling shall .have a minimum ground floor
area of not less than 480 square feet and housekeeping cabin _nqt less _than 300 square feet.

~ •. Off~~tr~~{:'Parking:
Off-street parking spaces shall:-:be .provided _in
accordance with requirements for specific uses set
, forth in;Se_(;tion · 12 of this- Ordinance-~
.· ' '. . ·

SECTION 10.

C-2 CENTRAL COMMERCIAL. DISTRICT
.
--

.,

.

. . ....

1. The regulations set forth in this section, or set
.forth :elsewh~re .in this .Ordinance when referred to in this
section, are the regulations in the C-2 Central Commercial
District.
2. Use .Regulations. A- building or,· premises shall . be
used only for the following purposes:
a. Any use permitted in the C-1 General Commercial Dis~
trict, except outdoor theatres. Limitations as to floor
area shall not apply when C-1 uses are located in the
C-2 Central Commercial District.
b.

Printing or engraving plants. ·

c.

Candy manufacture.

d. · Wholesal,.e establishments;
. e. . Wa;rehouses •.- ·
f.

Testing and research laboratories~

g. Truck or transfer terminal or freight house or
bus garages and repair shop.

�•

•
•

..

A-17

h. Fabrication and repair of electric or neon signs or
other commercial advertising structures, light sheet
metal products, and the like.
i.

Jewelry
·manufacturing .
. :• . .

j .

Ice· ·cream manufacturing.

.

k. Assembly and manufacture from prefabricated parts of
household appliances, electronic products and similar
products or the processing or assembling of parts for
production of finished equipment.
1. Other processing and manufacturing establishments that
are not objectionable because of smoke, odor, dust, or
noise, but only when such processing and manufacturing is
inciden~al to a retail business conducted on the premises.
m. Accessory buildings and accessory uses customarily
incident to the above uses.
3. Height Regulations.
Buildings and structures shall
exceed neither 100 feet, nor eight stories in height, except
as provided in Section 15 ~f this Ordinance.
4.

Area Regulations.

a.

Front Yard:
No front yard required.

b.

~1

~
-~.
~.
~.
~--

Side Yard:

A side yard is not required, except on the side of a
lot abutting an R District, in which case there shall
be a side yard of not less than five feet. If provided,
where not required, a side yard shall pe not less than
five feet.
c.

Rear Yard:

No rear yard shall be required for non-residential
buildings, except that a rear yard of 25 feet shall be
required on the rear of a lot abutting Upon a residence
district. Rear yards _for dwellings shall be 25 feet.
d.

Lot Area Per Familr:

Every building hereafter erected or structurally
altered for dwelling purposes shall comply with the
following lot area requirements.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

�·A-18
(1)
,_.

(2)

Singl~-::fapiily dwelling: 5,000 square feet •
•.

•' " f

Two-family d_w ellings: 2,500 square feet per family.

(3) Multiple dwellings: ,1,500 square feet per family.
Any lot which has less area than herein required and
was held under separate ownership at the effective .
date of this Ordinance may be occupied by any use
.. permitted in this district •.
e.

Minimum Floor Area:

Every dwelling shall have a minimum ground floor area
. of,480 square feet.

f,~.;: ·Off-Street

Parking~ :

Off-street parking spaces shall be provided in acGOrdance _w ith requirements for SJ?_~ cj..f ic uses set. forth
in Section 12 of this Ordinanc,~_.,1_.·. ,:,
··
SECTION ,11.

M-1 .MANUFACTURING DIS.T R-lCT

1. The regulations -set forth in this section ·~r set
forth elsewhere in this Ordinance, when referred to in this
section are the regulations in the M7i M_anufacturing District.

2. Use Regulations. A building or premises may be used
for any purpose, except that:
a. No building shall be erected, converted, reconstructed:,
or structurally altered for residential purposes, except
that each individual permitted use may provide accommodat~ons for one resident watchman or caretaker.
. ..

·1 .

b,. . The following' uses are subject t ·o special permit in
a~c9rdance with the procedures and under :the conditions
set out in Section 13 of this Ordinance.
(1)

Distillation of bones.

(2)

Fat rendering • .

(3)

Junk and -salvage yards.

..

(4) Manufacture of the following:
(a)

Cement, lime, gypsum, plaster of Paris •

.Cb),..· Explo$ives.

I.i :-

~

'

�I

•I

A-19

I

•I
I•

•
•••
•I.
].
1.
).
~~~~I

(c)

Fertilizer.

(d)

Glue.

(e)

Stockyard, feeding pen.

(f)

Slaughter of animals •

(g)

Tannery, curing of raw hi.des.

(h)

Wool pulling or scouring.

(5)

Oil refinery.

(6)

Trailer park.

(7)

Sanitary landfills and dumps. ·

3. Height Regulations •. Buildings and structures shall
exceed neither 100 feet, nor eight stories in height - except
as provided in Section 15 of this Ordinance.
·4.

Area Regulations .

a.

Front Yard:

Except as hereinafter provided in Section ·l5, the
fr.ont yard regulations are the. same as those in the
C-1 District.
b.

Side Yard:

No side yard is required except on the side .of a
lot abutting an R District, in which case there shall
be a side yard of not less than five feet.
c.

Off-Street Parking:

-Off-street parking spaces shall be provided in accordance with requirements for specific uses set forth in
Section 12 of this Ordinance.
d.

Rear Yard;

Except as ·hereinafter provided in Section 15, there
shall be a rear yard having a depth of 15 feet.
SECTION 12.

OFF-STREET PARKING REGULATIONS

_ 1. · Off-Stree-t Parking Requirements. . In all districts,
there shall be provided at the time any building or structure

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

�I
I

I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II

II

'

iii

A-20

is erected or structurally altered (to the extent hereinafter
provided), off-street parking spaces in accordance with the
following requirements:

i'i

a. Dwelling: one parking space for each bathroom or
fraction thereof provided in the dwelling.
b. Boarding and Lodging House:
each two sleeping rooms.
c. Private Club or Lodge:
ten members.

one parking space for

one parking space for every

d. Church: one parking space for each six seats or
seating spaces in the main aud,i torium.
e. School (except high scho_o1)' :: 19rie: ·parking space for
each ten sea ts in the audi tor:tuni:
main assembly room
or four spaces plus one additional space for each classroom whibhever is greater.
·

or

f. High School: one parking space for each six seats
in the main auditorium or three spaces . for each classroom, whichever is greater.

.,
.:

g. Community Center, Library, Museum or Art Gallery: ten
parking spaces plus one additional space for each 200
square feet of floor area in excess of 2,000 square feet.
h. Hospital or Nursing Home:
every two beds.

one parking space for

i ·.
Sanitarium, Home for the ·Aged or Similar Institution:
one parking space for each three beds.

j. Theatre or Auditorium (except school): one parking
space for each five seats or bencl) seating spaces.

k. Motel, Hotel, Tourist Home or Guest Ranch:
ing space for· each sleeping room or suite.

one park-

Sports Arena, Stadium or Gymnasium: one parking
space for each five seats or seating spaces.
1.

m. Restaurant, Night Club, Cafe, Dance Hall, or Similar
Recreation or Amusement Establishment or an Assembly or
Exhibition Hall without fixed seats: one parking space
for each 100 square feet -of floor area.
n; · Bowling All¢y: ·: ~our parking spa~es fo~ each alley.

I.

•·
Ii

~I

~

I·

�I

•
•
•
•
•

•
•
II

l.
•111
11

,II

~c

~~

A-21

o. Business or Professional Office, Studio, Bank, or
Clinic: three parking spaces plus one additional parking space for ea~h 300 square feet of floor area over
1,000 square feet •
p. Mortuary: one parking space for each 50 square feet
of floor space in parlors or individual funeral service
home.
q. Furniture, Appliance or Implement Store, Hardware
Store, Wholesale Establishments, · Machinery or Equipment
Sales and Servi6~, Clothing or Sho~ Repaii .6r Service
Shop: two parking spaces plus one additional parking
space for each 300 square feet of floor area over 1,000
square feet.
r. Retail Store or Personal Service Establishment not
otherwise specified herein: one parking space for each
200 square feet of floor area •

I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

s. Printing or Plumbing Shop or Similar Service Establishment; one parking space for each three persons employed · therein.
t. : M_a nufacturing or Industrial -Establishment, Research
or -Testing Laboratory, Creamery, Bottling Plant, Warehouse,
or Similar Establishment: two parking spaces for each
three employees on the maximum ~orking shift plus· space
to accommodate all trucks and other vehicles used in connection therewith.
2. General Rules for Determining Parking Requirements.
In computing the number of off-street parking spaces required,
the following rules shall govern.
a. Where fractional spaces result, the parking spaces
required shall be construed to be the next higher whole
number.
·
·
b. 'fhe parking spa_c e requirements for a use not specifically mentioned herein shall be the same as required for a use
of similar nature as determined by the Zoning Administrator.
c. Whenever a building or use constructed or established
after the .effective date of th~s Ordinance is changed or
enlarged in floor area, number of employees, seating
capacity or otherwise, to create a need for an increase of
10 percent or . more in the number of existing parking spaces,
~uch space shall be provided on the basis of the enlargement or change. Whenever a building or use existing prior

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

�I
I

I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
1

~
I

to the effective -date of this O:rdinance is enlarged to
· the extent of 50 percent or more in floor area, or in
the area used; said building or use shall then and
thereafter comply with the parking requirements s~t
forth herein.
d. In the case of mixed uses, the parking spaces required shall equal the sum of the requirements of the
various uses computed separately.
3.

Location and Improvement of Parking Areas.

a. All parking spaces required herein shall be located on the same lot with the building or use served,
but not within the required front yard in R-1 and R-2
Districts, except that where an increase in the number
of spaces is·required by a change or enlargement of
use or where the parking spaces are provided collectively or used jointly by two or more buildings' or
establishments, the required spaces may be located not
to exceed 300 feet from any -non-residential building
served. In any case, where the required parking spaces
are not located on the same lot with the bui.lding or
use served, or where such spaces are collectively or
· jointly provided and used, a written agreement to
assure their retention for such purposes shall be
properly · drawn and -executed by · the parties concerned,
approved as to form ~p.ct ·executed by the City Attorney
and shall be filed with · the application· for a building permit.
SECTION_13.

(,

SPECIAL USE . REGULAT.IONS.

1. The City Council may, by special permit after report
by the Planning Commission, authorize the location of any of
the following buildings or uses in any district from which
they are prohibited by this Ordinance and may also permit an
increase of height of any such building.
a. Cemetery, · including columbarium, mausoleum, or
crematory; provided, that any site· for a new cemetery
shall contain at least 50 acres~
·
b~ Commercial stables and riding academies in the R-1
and .R-2 Districts; provided, they are ' located on sites
containing not less than two and one-half acres.

c.

Drive-in theatre in: the ·R-1 and R-2 Rural Districts;
provided it complies · with the . following requirements:

I
11!

�•
•
•II

A-23

(1) Ingress or egress for any site abutting_,
a state highway shall be approved by the Stat,e
Highway Department; otherwise such approval ·
shall be given by the . City Cou:qcil!"-:
(2) Reservoir off~street standing spa~e or
side service road space shall be provided at
any entrance sufficient to accommodate vehicles in an amount equal to at least 30 percent
of the vehicular capacity of the theatre.

11111
~

(3) Any building or structure shall be at
least 50 feet from any street on any side
where ingress or egress is permitted.
(4) Any area of the site accessible to vehicles of patrons shall be surfaced with gravel,
oil, or other higher-type paving, except that
any reservoir off-street standing space or
side service road shall be surfaced with oil
or other higher-type paving where such space
or road connects with a public way, as required by the City Council.
(5) Any screen_ less than 500 feet from a .
county, arterial or state highway shall be so
located or shielded that the picture surface
cannot be seen from such highway.
(6) The site shall be enclosed with a wall,
solid fence, or compact evergreen hedge at
least six feet high, except as provided in
paragraph 3 above.
d.

Golf course, commercial or private.

e. Institution (penal, correctional or mental} in
the R-1 and R-2 Districts, provided, the site shall
contain an area of at least five acres.
f. Privately or commercially operated ski facilities,
with lodging facilities meeting requirements of paragraph Le.

g. Trailer parks in all ·districts provided they comply
with the Trailer Coach Act, (243 of 1959).

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

h. Publicly or privately owned or operated sanitary
landfill or sewage treatment plant in the R-1 an~ R-2

I
I

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II

II'

I

Districts when located 80 -rods from any public road
and provided that all parts, of the use shall be enclosed by :nat,u ral .features ;such. as trees and terrain
so as to ob.struct .· from sight.- :

•

i. Publi.c ly,..owned warehouse /, garage, ,. shop -or storage
yard · in the R-1- and R-2 Distri.c.ts.
Nursery school.. when operated in a building with the
external appearance of a residence in all "R" Districts.

j -.

k. Real estate sales offices, in connection with a
specific development for a period of not more than one
year.

•

1. · Junkyard when locat~d -§9 rods from any public road
and provided that all pa:f-t'si '&amp;f
. . the use shall be enclosed
by natural features, such as : trees and .terrains so as to
obstruct from sight.
. ,.
\-·

2. Before the issuance of· any special permit for any
of the abov.e buildings or. uses,· /the application for such
permit shall be made in writing on :forms prescribed by the
Planning Commission. Each application shall be accompanied
by an accurate plot plan, site plan, · building development
plan, sketch,. program of development, or other related material .and information requirect ·by the Planning Commission
or this Ordinance.
3. Before. any ;,application for a special per.mi t shall
be considered ,-by the Planning Commission, a fee of $25.00
shall be charged, which shall be .payable to the City of Gaylord.
When an application is withdrawn after scheduling and advertising for public hearing by the Planning Commission, the filing
fee shall not be refunded to . the applicant.
4. Public )1earings on all applications for special
permits shall be held by the Planning Commission in accordance with the p~ocedures of hearings on changes and -amendments to this Ordinance as prescribed in Section 17 of this
Ordinance. Irr event of approval of the application by the
Planning Commission,~ written recommendation shall -be made
to the City Council. The City Council shall not authorize
the issuance of a special per.mi t until it receives such
I'.ecommendation.
.

. ..:

~

.

5. Appeals of any denial of an application for a
special pern:iit.by . the Planning Commission may be made . to the
City, Co.u nc.il: within the time prescribed for appeals from
denial of applications foi changes or amendments of this
Ordinance and in accordance with procedures prescribed in
Section 17 of this Ordinance.

I
I

11
I
li
1

I

�I
A-25

•
•
•1
•
•
•
•
•
•
!~

ii

•la
•

6. In approving any application, the City Council shall
impose. minimum requirements as required by this section, together with such additional requirements as the City Council
deems necessary to safeguard th~ public welfare, safety, health,
morals, convenience, anq best -interest of the adjoining property, neighborhood and community.
7. Violation of any requirement imposed by the City
Council in approving an application filed under this section
shall constitute a violation of this .Ordinance and shall be
subject to the same penalties as any other violation of this
Ordinance. Any requirement imposed by the City Council shall
become effective and shall be strictly complied with immediately
upon execution or utilization of any portion of the rights and
privileges authorized by approval of an application.
SECTION 14.

NONCONFORMING USES

1. Nonconforming Buildings. Any lawful use of a building existing at the effective date of this Ordinance may be
continued, even though such use does not conform to the provisions hereof, but no such building shall be enlarged or extended. If no structural alterations are made, a nonconforming use of a building may be changed to -another nonconforming
use of the same or to a more restricted classification. Whenever a nonconforming use has been changed to a· more restricted
use or to a conforming use, such use shall not thereafter be
changed to a less restricted use. The nonconforming use of a
building may be extended throughout those parts, which were
manifestly arranged or designed for such use at the time of
adoption of this_ Ordinance •
a. Whenever the use of a building shall become nonconforming through a change in the zoning regulations
or in the district boundaries; such use may be -continued and if no structural alterations are made,
may be changed to another nonconforming use of. the
same or of a more restricted classification.
b. Whenever a nonconforming use of a building or
portion thereof is discontinued for a continuous period
of two years, such nonconforming use shall be deemed to
be abandoned, and any future use of such building or
portion thereof, shall be in conformity with the regulations of the district in which such building is located.
c. A nonconforming building which has been damaged by
fire, explosion, act of God or the public enemy to the
extent of more than 75 percent of its reproduction value

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
·1

I

'I
l
l

�I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

'

II

at the time of damage, shall not be restored except in
conformity with the regulations of ·the district in which
it is located. When damaged by less than 75 percent of
its reproduction value, a nonconforming building may be
repaired or reconstructed and · used as before the time ' of
damage; provided such repairs or reconstruction are completed within one year from the date of such damage.
• 2. Nonconforming Uses of Land. - A nonconforming use of
land existing at the effective date of this Ordinance may be
continued; provided, however, · that no such nonconforming use
of land shall be in any way exp·a nded or extended, either on
the same or adjoining proper-t y. :' If such nonconforming use ·of
land or arty portiort thereof is discontinued for a continuous
period of one year, any future use of such land shall be in
conformity with the provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 15.

SUPPLEMENTARY HEIGHT AND AREA REGULATIONS

1. The regulations set forth in this section qualify
or supplement the district regulations appearing elsewhere
in this Ordinance.
·
2.

Modification of Height Regulations·.

a. The height regulations as prescribed in this
Ordinance shall not apply to: belfries, chimneys,
church spires, conveyors, cooling towers, elevator
bulkheads, fire towers, flag poles·, monuments, ornamental towers and spires, smoke stacks, stage towers,
or scen~ry lofts, tanks and water towers~
b. Public, semi-public or public service buildings,
hospitals, institutions or schools, when permitted in
·: a district may be erected to a height -not exceeding 60
feet, and churches may be erected to a height not exceeding ·75 feet when the required side and rear yards
are each increased by at least one foot for each foot
of additional building height above the height regulations for the district. in which the building is located.
c. All buildings · and-· structures within 500 feet of an
airport shall not exceed :35 feet or two and one-half
stories in height irrespective of the requirements of
the district-in which : the airport is located.
3.

Modification of Area Regulations.

a.

Yards; Generally:
(1) Whenever a lot abuts upon a public alley, onehalf of the alley width may be considered as a portion of the required yard.

I
I

�A-27

•

(2) All parts of _any required yards or open
spaces shall be open ·to the sky, except as
authorized by this Section, and except for
accessory buildings in the rear yard, open
rir lattice-enclosed balco~ies opening upon
fire towers which may project as much as 10
feet into the rear yard, and ordinary projections of skylights, sills, chimneys, belt
courses, cornices and ornamental features which
may project as much as 12 inches into a required
yard.
(3) In the event that a lot is to be occupied
by a group of two or more related buildings to
be used for residential, institutional, hotel,
or motel purposes, there may be more than one
main building on the lot when such buildings
are arranged around a court having direct street
access; provided, however~

■

(a) That said court between buildings
that are parallel or within 45 degrees of
being parallel, shall have a minimum width
of 30 feet for one-story buildings, 40
feet for two-story buildings, and 50 feet
for three-story buildings, and -~n no case
may such buildings be closer to each other
than 15 feet; and
(b} Where a court having direct access
to a building is more than 50 percent surrounded by a building, the minimum width
of the court shall be at least 30 feet
for one-story buildings~ 40 feet for two
story buildings and 50 feet for threestory buildings.
(4) Where a lot is used for a commercial or
industrial purpose, more than one main building
may be located on the lot, but only when such
buildings conform to all open space requirements around the lot for the district in which
the lot is located.
(5) Front and side yards shall be waived for
any dwelling, hotel or boarding or lodging house
erected above the ground floor of a building when
said ground floor is designed exclusively for commercial or industrial purposes.

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1

I
l
l
l

l

l

---=

�I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-~
-

A-28

· b.

Accessory Buildings and Structures.
(1) · · Except as· herein provided, no accessory building
shall project beyond a· 'required yard line along any
street. ·
·

I
l
I
I

(2} . Filling station pumps~and pump islands may occupy the required · yards;" ·provided, however, that they
are not less than 12 feet from street lines.
(3)
One directional or name sign or sign advertising
products sold on the premises may occupy required
yards in
district where such sign· is permitted by
the use'. Tegulations of this Ordinance; provided such
sign doe·s: not contain ffashing, moving, or intermi ttent illumination;

a

(4)
Accessory, · open and uncovered swimming pools and
home barbecue grills may occupy a required rear yard;
provided they are 'not located closer than five feet to
the rear or side lot line.

( 5) Accessor'y buildings which are not a part of the
· main build.ing, although connected by an open breezeway may be ·constructed in a rear yard; provided such
accessory building does not occupy more than 30 percent of the area of 'the· required rear yard, and provided it is not located closer than five feet to the
rear or side lot line.

f

c. · Front Yards:
{1) Where an official line has been established for
the future widening or -opening of a street upon which
a lot abuts, then the depth of a front or side yard
shall be measured from· such official line to the nearest
line of the building.
Girages detached ' or attadhed to the main building
and· entering on the side street o'f a ·corner lot shall
maintain a yard of 20 feet in front of the garage.
(2)

Open, unenclosed porches, platforms, or paved
terraces, not covered by a roof or canopy and which
do not extend above the level of the first floor of
the building, may extend or project into the front
or side yard, not more than six feet.
(3)

(4)
The front yards heretofore established shall be
adjusted in the following cases:

I

r

�A-29
(a) Where 40 percent or more of the frontage
on the same side of a street between two intersecting streets or on water frontage is developed
with two or more buildings that have (with a variation of five feet or less) a front yard greater
in depth than herein required, new buildings shall
not be erected closer to the street or water's
edge than the front yard so established by the
existing building nearest the street line.
(b) Where 40 percent or more of the frontage
on one side of a street between two intersecting streets or on water frontage is developed with
two or more buildings that have a front yard of
less depth than herein required, then:
(b-1} Where a building is to be erected on a
parcel of land that is within 100 feet of
existing buildings on both sides, the minimum front yard shall be a line drawn between
the two closest front corners of the adjacent
building on each side; or
(b-2) Where a building is to be erected on
a parcel of land that is within 100 feet of
an existing building on one side only, such
building may be erected as close to the street
or water's edge as the existing adjacent building.
SECTION 16.

I

•
•

BOARD OF APPEALS

There is hereby created a Zoning Board of Appeals which
shall perform its duties and exercise its powers as provided
by Act 207 of the Public Act of 1921, as amended, and by the
provisions of this Ordinance to the end that the objectives
of this Ordinance are observed, public safety, health, morals
and general welfare secured and substantial justice done.
a. The said Board shall consist of seven members
appointed by the City Council. The members shall serve
for terms of two for one year, two for two years, and
three for three years, respectively, in the first instance, and .t hereafter appointments shall be for three
years each. At least one member of the Board shall be
a member of the City Planning Commission. The Chairman
of the Board shall be annually elected by the members of
the Board. Vacancies shall be filled by the City Council
·f or ·the unexpired term.

I
I
I
I

I

1
1

l
l
l
l

�I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
II
II

-II
II
t

'fll
II
t
-~

,· b • . The Board shall ·fix a reasonable ··and regular time
and place . for meetings and -it shall adopt such rules as
... may be -necessary -and proper to govern. its proceedings.
Such :rules shall be in -conformance with requirements of
this Ordinance. All meetings shall be-open to the public.
The Board shall keep minutes of ·its proceedings, including a record of the vote 6f each member on each action
and such -minutes shall be public records.•
c.

Powers and Duties:
The Board of Appeals shall have the following powers:
(1) To hear and determine appeals where it is
alleged there is · error or- abuse of discretion in
any order, requirement, decision, or determination
made by the .. Building Inspector in the enforcement
of the provisions of this · Ordinance.
·(2) To hear and determine appeals from the rulings,
decisions, and · determinations of the Building Inspector
granting or denying applications for variation from
any requirement of this Ordinance.
Appeals - How Made: :
(1) An appeal shall be -in writing and shall be
-filed in duplicate in the office of the Building
Inspector upon forms provided by the Board. Such
appeal must set forth specifically wherein it is
claimed there was an error or an abuse of discretion by this action or where the decision is not
supported by evidence in the matter.,
· (2) · Any appeal nBt filed within -10 days after the
· rendition, in writing, of the decision appealed
from, . shall be dismissed by the Board.

(3) Within five days after the filing of the
appeal, the Building Inspector -shall transmit to
.the Board all papers involved in the proceedings,
'. a . copy of his findings and determination relative
thereto,·· and one copy of the ·appeal. In addition,
he may make and transmit to the.Board such supplementary .report as ·h e may deem necessary to · present
clearly the facts and circumstances of . the case.
..

.

'

(4) Upon receipt of the record, the Board shall
set the matter for hearing and ..give ,notice by . mail

I

•I
•I
I
I

11

I

I
-.d
11;1

�A-31

of the time, place and purpose thereof to the
appellant and to any other party at interest whb
has requested in writing to be so notified, and
no other notice thereof need be given, except in
those cases hereinafter mentioned.
(5) Upon hearing of such appeals, said Board may
affirm, change, or modify the ruling~ decision, : or
determination appealed from, or in lieu thereof:,
make such other or additional determination as it
shall deem proper in the premises.
(6) The decision of the Board upon the appeal
shall be in writing concurred in by at least three
members · of the Board, which shall forthwith transmit a copy thereof to th·e appellant~ Any such :decision shall, in all instances, be firial administrative
. decisions, and shall be .s ubject to judicial review as
by law may be provided •

•
•
•

(7) No determination of the Board permitting the
alteration or erection of a building under a variation shall be valid for i •period loriger than Six
months unless a building ·permit for such alteration
or erection is obtained within such· period and such
alteration or erection is started and proceeds to
completion in accordance with the terms of such permit.
(8) No determination of the Board permitting a use of
a building or premises under a variation shall be
valfd for a period longer than six months; unless such
use is established within such period.; provided, however,· that where such use is dependent upon the erection or alteration of a building, such determination
shall continue in force and effect if a building permit for said erection or alteration is started and
proceeds to completion in accordance with the terms
of such permit.

3.

'

Building Permit.

a. No building permit shall be issued by the Building
Inspector until he is satisfied that the proposed building structure complies with all of the regulations of
this Ordinance. Where a building permit is not required
for the use of land, a Zoning Certificate shall be issued
by the 1·n spector certifying that the use of such land
complies with all the regulations · of thi·s Ordinance.

I
I
I

I

1
l

l

.1
l
1

�A-33

buildings shall have been completed in conformity
with the provisions of this Ordinance. A record
of all certificates shall be kept on file in the
office of. the Building Inspector. ·
(4) No permit for excavation for any building
shall be issued before application has been made
for Certificate of Occupancy and Compliance.

SECTION 17.

AMENDMENTS

The City Council may from time to time amend, supplement,
or change by ordinance the boundaries of the district or the
regulations herein established.
Before taking action on any .proposed amendment, supplement or change, the Council _shall submit the same to the
Planning Commission for its consideration and for public
hearing in accordance with the requirements of Act 207 of
the Public Acts of 1921, as amended. When any such amendment proposes the rezoning of any premises, the Building
Inspector shall cause the premises to be posted for six days
preceding the date of the hearing with at least one sign
stating the nature of the proposed rezoning and the time and
p1ace of the hearing.
Following the public hearing, further procedure shall
be in accordance with the provisions of Act 207 of the Public Acts of 1921, as amended.

SECTION 18.

PENALTIES

1. Any building or structure which is erected, altered,
maintained or used and any use of land which is begun, maintained or changed in violation of any provisions of this
Ordinance is hereby declared to be a nuisance per se. Any
person, firm, corporation or other organization which violates,
disobeys, omits, neglects or refuses to comply with or resists the enforcement of any provision shall be fined upon
conviction not less than Ten Dollars ($10.00) nor more than
Fifty Dollars ($50.00) together with the costs of prosecution, or shall. be punished by imprisonment in jail for not
less than one day nor more than five days for each offense,
or may be both fined and imprisoned as provided herein at
the discretion of the Court. Each and every day during which
an illegal erection, alteration, maintenance or use continues
shall be deemed a separate offense. The imposition of any
sentence shall not exempt the offender from compliance with
the provisions of this Ordinance.

�A-34

•
•II
•I
I

-II
-II
-

·2. , The City Council, the Board of Appeals, or any owner
or owners of real estate within the Zoning District in which
such building; structure .or premises .is situated may institute injunction, mandamus, abatement or -any other appropriate
action or proceedings to prevent, enjoin, abate, or remove any
said unlawful erection; alteration, maintenance, or use. The
rights and remedies provided herein are -cumulative, and in
addition to all other :remedies provided by law.

SECTION 19.

VALIDITY

This Ordinance and all parts thereof are hereby declared
to be severable. If any part is adjudged unconstitutional
or invalid, it is hereby provided that the remainder of this
Ordinance shall not be affected thereby. The City Council
hereby declares that it would have passed thiS hOrdinance and
each part, section, subsection, phrase, sentence and clause
thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or, more parts,
sections, subsections, phrases, sentences or · clauses be declared invalid.
·

I

I~
,.

'II

,.

•

�APPENDIX B
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION REGULATIONS
GAYLORD, MICHIGAN

•I
~

~

•
•ii
I

'

Prepared for the

CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
by

Harland Bartholomew and Associates
Saint Louis, Missouri

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

I
1
1

�'J I

TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section

. . .

. .

1

Title and Purpose.

2

Definitions.

3

Jurisdiction and Procedures.

4

Preliminary Plan

5

Final Plat Requirements ••

6

Design Standards

7

Improvements ••

8

Exceptions • • •

9

Changes and Amendments

• • • B-16

10

Validity. • • • • • •

. . . . . . . . . .B-16

11

Penalties ••

12

Conflicting Ordinances Repealed •• • • • .B-17

...

• • B-2

....

....

... . . . . . .

• • B-2

• • • B-4

• • • .B-6

. . . . . . . .B-8
•
• • . . . • • • • • B-9
. . . . . . . . . . .B-13
. . . . . . . . . . . . .B-15

.. .

. .

• • • • • • • • B-16

�"
"
II"
II

"
'
II'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
'

PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
REGULATIONS, .
. .. ..
,

•·

Gaylord, Michigan
The following regulations provide for ·the 'harmonious development of areas in the City, _for the coordination of streets
within· s·u bdivisions with· 0th.e r existing or planned streets or
with oth~rfeaturep of the· Comprehensive Plan; for adequate
operi spaces for · traffic, recreation; light ; and air, for an appropriate distribution -of population· and traffic ·and for in. _. s·tallation · of· physical ·improvements, 'w hich will fend· to create
condi ti•o ns favorable to health, s ·a fety; convenience, and prosperity. ·
·
:

PROPOSED
SUBDIVISION REGULATION ·
A REGULATION TO PROMOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH PRESENT AND
FUTURE NEEDS, THE SAFETY, MORALS, ORDER,' CONVENIENCE, PROSPERITY, AND· GENERAL WELFARE -OF' THE CITIZENS OF THE CITY OF·
GAYLORD, MICHIGAN, AND TO PROVIDE FOR EFFICIENCY AND ECONOMY
IN THE PROCESS OF DEVELOPMENT, FOR CONVENIENCE OF TRAFFIC AND
CIRCULATION OF GOODS, FOR GOOD CIVIC DESI.GN AND .ARRANGEMENT,
AND FOR ADEQUATE PUBLIC UTILITIES AND FACILITIES BY PRESCRIBING RULES AND' STANDARDS·FOR'- :THE SUBDIVIStON OF LAND AND FOR
THE ACCOMPLISHMENT Oi!" SAIO: 'PURPOSES TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADMINISTRATION AND ENFORCEMENT ,.HEREOF.
.
, . . · .. .i
BE IT ORDAINED; BY THE CITY COUN_CIL OF ,GAYLORD, MICHIGAN.

•

!

'

'

~

.· !

.

..

·.

�IJ
I

B-2

I
I
I
~

•
•I
II

•II

II
II

•
-I
•I

. .

. .

:

t t, : . ,- '

1. Title. This R~~ttl~tion -shall be known, referred to,
and cited as, "The Land Subdivision Regulations of the City of
Gaylo:r;~i ,)1',l.i ~~igan" -~ . .~ . . . . .. , "'
~
~
•

'•

..

'

•

~

, ,

• 1

•

.(. • • .,,

• ,

f

•

;

'

• •

•

, ' • \, \ :, '

,'

•• • •

•

•

I

,

•

.' '

•• ,

•

•

.

•

· ,

.
. 2;. Purpose. This Regulation is .. to · provide for t'he ·h~r·monious dev.~;to"pµient of ' areas. w~ 1;1).in,, the Ci.t y of Gaylor:d , fo_r
. the· coordiilatio'n . of stre'e ts wftp.in supdiv:i,.s.i ons . with"' other exi,s~ing ·or.. pla,p'ried_· sti;\eets;_o:r .y,ri_th . other ' fe~t~re~ . of ·1:h·e . Com~
prehen,s~v.e, , P~ap.; . ;or·· adequate, C?PEin. spaces ;. _for tfa":ffi9, · r~cr~atlqn, light. _a nd a~r; a;nd f9;r a d;i;§tribution of populat;J.9n . and
trri.ffic which will tend to create conditions favorable
health, safety, convenience and prosperity.

to

.f .

I ' '

_

•

SECTION II - DEFINITIONS
.•:
··:;:··:
· :·'·.. . , ; .··· ... .
' . •.- . .
;_. ,;
·.' . .', .

..
For -t)l~ purpose o.f . th:i,.s Regl;l.l at,ion, cer.ta;i.n . words and
te·:r;m$ are : p.er~\v:j. th de'.:f i,ne_d; the . singular in9 ludes the plural
and - the : :plural ; inc 1-udes the,'. ~·iµgu·lµ; . the i
"sh~l 1 is: .,
m,and:a tory__and , np~ :--d}rec~&lt;;&gt;ry.·. : ·
· · · · · ' , ..,. '·
· ._ ;:''. -' .:.

word

o

•

I

l

•, •

;

11

'i' •••• • • : / ,' ' ••.

•

. , 1.
· ., ...
- . .·_.• Subdivision.
.
•

'

•

:

~

•

•

•'

'

•

•

•

l

,

••

•, l

•

;

•..

;

'.

•

• '

II

-I
!

-~
l

•,

~

II
II

'

,'

: ;

,

I.

~

(a) . 'l'he,; diyis;ion .o'fi,-any,, parce:r of _. land showµ ij.s. ,;. :,
a unft'. or .as :con"t;,iguoU:s .'.i.1nits ori . the ' last pr·eced1ng ~ .. .;
tax roll, . in.t o three . or mp~e .'pa_:i;cels, .. :~ite~,. ot· lots,:, .. .·
any one of which is less than five . acres ·~ for the ·pur~ .
pose,. wh~ther .immediate .or,..fut1:1re of tra_n sfer of . ownership; ·provided·~ however, . that ' the divi"sion or partition
of land into parcels of more than five acres, not involving any new streets, or easements of access and the
sale or exchange of parcels between adjoining lot owners,
where such sale or exchange does not create additional
building sites, shall be exempted; or,
(b) The improvement of one or more parcels of land
for residential, commercial, or industrial structures
or groups of structures involving the division or allocation of land for the opening, widening or extension of
any street or streets, except private streets serving
industrial structures; the division or allocation of
land as open spaces for common use by owners, occupants,
or lease holders, or as easements for the extension and
maintenance of public sewer, water, storm drainage or
other public facilities.
2. Subdivision, Class 1. A subdivision in which the
smallest lot has an area of less than one acre and a width
of less than 150 feet •

II
ll

�•
•
•
I.
•
•1•

r "

,

\i ■

1YI

1•

•
•I.

3. Subdivision, : Class , 2. A subdivision in which the ,
smallest lot has an area of one acre or more and a width of
more than 150 feet.
4. Building Line. A line ol'l a• plat · between which line
and a · street. no building or structure may be :erected~ '
.5. Cul-de-Sac.· A minor street with only .o'n·e ' outlet and
culminated by a turnaround.
6. Roadway; That portion of. ·the str·e et · avai:lable for
vehicular . traffic and, where curbs are laid, the -portion .f rom
batjc-to-back of curbs.
·•,i
7. Street. All property dedicated or intended for public
or private use · for ·.access to abutting lands: ~r .s~bject to public easements. therefor;·:· and whether designated as a street,
highway, thoroughfare, parkway, throughway, . e'xpressway, road,
avenue, boulevard, lane, place, ·circle or . however otherwise ·
designated.
8. ,Minor Stre.et. A street n0t designated as -a major
thoroughfare in the Major: Thoroughfare Plan for Gaylord.
9. ,Major Thoroughfare~ A street designated as a major
thoroughfare: in the Major Thoroughfare -Plan .-for Gaylord •
10. Easement~- · A grant by the property owner of the use
for a specific purpose of a strip of - land by the general public, a corporation or a certain person or persons •

11. Lot. · A portion of a subdivision or other parcel of
land intended for the purpose, whether immediate or future, of
transfer of ownership or for building development.

I

jj

~

•
I

1•
1•
1•

I.

12.- Subdivider. Any person, individual, firm, partnership, -association, corporation, estate, trust or any -other
group or -combination -acting as a unit, - dividing; or proposing
to divide land so as to constitute a subdivision as defined
herein and includes . any .··agent of the subdivider •

· 13. - Performance . Bond • . A surety :bond or. cash deposit made
out to the City of -Gaylord in an amount equal ·to the full cost
of the improvements which are required by this regulation, said
cost being estimated by the City Engineer and -said surety bond
or cash deposit -being legally sufficient to secure to the City
that the said improvements will be constructed in accordance
with tbis ·regulation.

�SECTION .III ~ : JURISDICTION AND . J?~.,O~Q:µRE · :·, . . . . _
f .
,···.
, ,.. .
1. Plat, When Required.
It shall be ·unlawful for the.
owner, agent, or persons having control of any land within
the .' City;'c,f.· Gaylord · to· subdivide i or lay, oµt such I .a nd -into
lots, blocks ;- streets ·, . avenues,· alleys; public ways · and
grounds, unless by plat in accordance with the laws of the
.• State i of -Michigan · arid .: the provisi-o ns of this _R~gulation.
'

I
I

•II
I
I

"•
•

.I
;

•·

·1 1
I

Each subdivider should confer with the City Engineer
before · preparing .·the . preliminary. ·. p1an in . ord~;r that he may
.become -familiar with '. the requirements of these :regulations
and the proposals of the Comprehensive Plan as ··they ·may apply
to the land proposed to be subdivided •
. I

•.~ .-

_;

:

· 2: .. Procedure~ .. In . :obtaining f i nal approval oi' 'a propqsed subdivision ,by the Planning Commission ·· and :•the City ·
Council,, .the subdivider -shall .submit a pr.eliminary plan, a
performance bond ·; ias -may be required and a . f,inal ·plat ·in · accordance with this Regulation.
·

,. .. (a) · -'llhe · subdivider shall firs:t :.P.r epal;'e .··aii_d file
with .·_ the .City: Engineer four •copies · of ··a preliminary ·
plan conforming to the requirements set forth in this
i •. :Regulation~ . · Said plans sball:_- ·b~ _:a~c.9mp~_
ie.4 •. ~y a fee
.of One Dollar . ($LOO) -for :each lot ·in the ·subdivision
providing said subdivision does not consist of less
than ten ·· lots; ·. in, which case a ,·minimum f:_il~~g -fee , of
Ten •Dollars .. ($10.00) · .shall be required.,',
· ·. •
. ·· ,:
.
(b) A hearing on the preliminary plan will be
held before · .the :.Plannirig Commission at its . f;1t,st .regular meeting following the filing. No ·hearinir~shall - . :
be held by ·. the Commission until notice ·thereof, which
shall include the time and place, shall be given by
. the City Engineer . in :behalf · of the Cornp1i,s si.bn,_~ by
mailing · a notice to =the persbn o~ persons who filed
'the preliminary plan to •the address set forth in the
filing papers ' arid :to such · other interested parties , :
as may be · determined by . the Commission.

I

1

)

•,

· ·· · (c) ,. '-The City Engineer shall : ¢xanii:P.Jf said plan · as
: · to its compliance · with the laws and regulations ,of tne·.
. • City . of Gaylord;- the existing street system ·and good
engineering practi'ces: '- and shall, .withiw·l5 days;·' suB- ·
:•mit his, findings
in duplicate ' to . the Planning Commission •
. . ,,
:

·. ..

(d) The Planning Commission, upon receivingthe
City Engineer's report, shall within a reasonable time
consider said report and pass upon the plan. It shall

, !1

~

1f

~~
•
Ii

�•
•
•I.
,.
1:r i
•1.
,~.
l.
l■
'•
'•

B-5
then set ..forth its recommendat_ions in writing, whether
. of approval, modification· 6:r ·~is approval. In case of
. modif.ication c;&gt;r disapproval, . it. shall give its reasons
. therefor. The. Planning Commi_s sion sh~ll return one
copy of any approved preliminary plan to the supdivider.

I

1

I

I~

. _ (e) Upon approval of the .preliminary plan _by the
Planning. Commiss_ion, the subdivider may proce~d with
_the preparation of the final plat arid detailed construction drawings and specifications for the improvements
required under this Regulatiqn.
.

.

(f) The approval of--the preiiminiry plan by the
Planning Commission is revc;&gt;cable and, does not constitute final approval: _. or acceptance , of the sub di vision
by- the City Council - or authorization to proceed on
construction of improvenien,t s _within the subdivision
but sµall qonsti tute. ap:pro:v.al -:o.f . layout and general
engineering proposais, and plans.
.
. (g) Before submitting .the final plat to the Planning Commission for approval, the subdivider shall
furnish _all pl~ns_ and . information as listed in "Final
Plat Requirements" necessary for the .detailed engineering consideration of .the improvement.s required and
obtain the approval of the City Engineer which shall
be endorsed thereon.
(h) For · final .p lat approval, -the subdivider shall
submit to the Plan~ing Commission:
.. . .

' (1)

. (2).

.

.'

:

Six copi,es. of the final plat.
.

'

A perfo~mance- bond as :r ·e quired and
approved by the City _Enginee~.

(3)

One copy of the certified approved
plans, profiies, cross sections and
specifications.

{4)

A certificate from the City Engineer
that the final plat is substantially
in accord with the ·preliminary plan
as approved by the . ~lanning Commission.

'

.

(

(i) . W}Jen the finai plat has been passed upon by the
Planning Commission, six copies of the final plat and
performance bond shall forthwith .be transmitted to the
City Council together with a certificate showing the action of the Planning Commission.

�I j'
I

·. (j) :'·-' when the f:i.nal plat ·has been · approved by the
Ci'ty' C~uncii'~· t'be · pe·r forma:hce. ; bond -:accepted;' and all
:-, '. ; si'x' copies . duly; ce:ttifiec:l', ·· ·o ne copy shall be delivered
. . to- the Planni'ng . Commission ; and ·o ne copy to• ·the · Ci-ty
&gt;&lt; ·' ':i!:ngi'neer ··fo'r : tlreir i·es'pective files, and t 1hree to , the
. subdivider, two of which are for filing with the County
· · ile·c order·: and ·eounty ·'Auditor ~ · If said :plat is · disapproved
; by' fhe ·ctty ·council·, . such disapproval shall pointi: 'out in
. ·, · ·w ri'ting· whereiri · said· pro·p os~d plat · is obJecti_onable •
. :
(k) The passage - of the resolution accepting the
plat shall constitute final approval of the platting of
·. the - area' shown on the ' final plat, but · the · owner shall
· -. cause such plat' 1to be recorded· in the offices· 1of the
Cdunty Audi tor ahd Gounty Record'e r• of Deeds, · and shall
file · satisfactoty evidence of such •recording 'in the office· of the City Engineer before the City shall recognize the :plat ·~s being in fUll force and effect.
. 'i .

·

;

•
•I
I

'I
II
I

•

·,

'

(1)

.

The State requires certain certificates be

ent~i~d 6~ r~bord tOgethe~w~th the certifie~ .~lat.
•

•

:

f

••

• •

..

.

•

.

•·

.'

:,_._

l

(in) ' &gt; 'Receipt : df · the- duly!. certified· fi'nal '· Plat by
tbe ·· subdivider is authorization: that " he· may proceed
wi-th ·th_e · installation and const!I'Ucti'o n · of the . required
improvements. ··
· ,:.
·
·

(n) The City of Gaylord ', will return the performance
bond t ·o · .the ' subdiv·ider upon certification by the City
Engineer of satisfactory -comple·tion: · of- the ' installation
and construction of the required improvements and acceptance of the requ-ired ·:1.mprovemehts by• the City Council.
Pr~or to certification_ by the City Engineer, the subdivid'e r · shall file with · the City Engineer plans, profiles,
and cross sections of the required' i mprovements as they
have be_e n_ buil ~PRELIMINARY PLAN .:

SECTION · IV -

1. The Preliminary Plan shall be clearly and legibly
drawn to a ·scale of o'ne itich to one- hundrect ·feet or less and
shall ·be 'plainly marked ,_,,: P..reliin'i narY Plan" .
~

2~

.: •

,;· ;

- . ~. -

• . _., ..

:.. !

': ·.

' .:

!

..

.

.

The Plan Shall Shov/~

. ..

!. - -.

· ·· · · · .

··: (a) The, proposei°&lt;:f riame: of· the subdivision and, if
different,· the t i tle -· under · which the .• subdi vi's ion · is to

be recorded.

.

·,;

:

.

:

,, ... ·: ·· ,

..• .• 1 , ; . .. ;

, '. : '

!.·

�l
l

B-_7

■

I.

(b) The name and·· addr.ess. pf. the owner ·:a,nd ·..tl,1e name,
address and profession o·f ·1:lie 'person preparing the plan.

:.:·,::·:.·.\cl- ~~h~

d~t~,, . sda"i_e~. ~~d: -~~rt'b po.i iit"', .•·ali'd·' ·.~

key

map,
. showing· .the gene_r al lo_q ati;Q_Il . of. the proposed-_subdiyi~ion
in re'fatiori to surrounding development.
;

(d)

~i· ~:

• . • •

\. • ·•.

J \;. ' . .

. .

The legal descripti6t1 .. o·f--·the- ·area · being platted.

(~~· . T~~-~~undary.ii~~ i~~c~rate in s~~le), t~e dimensions and location of the property to be platted and
the location. of ·. section lines. , Contours , _wi t ,h· intervals
of ~ot l~ss ihan five ie~t. ·
··
·

·. , .. :· (f )' .

Tll·~' ~-~ -~s; ~.n d loc_3: ti~~, of -adj-acent subdivisions

and the names of record owners and location of adjoining
.. -p arcels· of .:unplatted la.nd • . -... ..

-·

-

. .. ··

.

'

.,

•••

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

I,. .

•

•

J

.

•

. _(g) .Th_e location of proper_ty lines,.. str.eets and
alleys, , easements,, buildi·ngs ,: ,uti,'li t;ies,, watercoµrses,
~ree ~asses and ~ther existing ~eatur~s . affecting the
plan.
·
.

.

0

.

zo~ing

(b)_,.- Th~.
_cla~sj'.fi.~ ~tion ap4 p;oposed: use for
the area being platted.
·
(i) . ·

The ia.yo~t, :. nu'~b~~ and · appro~iµi~te:: -~limen!3ions
of proposed lots.
{j). ·_:;r~~ -.:•1~yo11t of al~ existing. ap~- pro_ppsed b11ild-

ing lines and easeplents • .·

·

· ·, ,

. ,· ~k) . Tbe .locatio~,-. width: .and. diuiep.s_:i,ons of all streets,
.. B;lleyi;; .~nd grounds prop&lt;;&gt;s_ed to ..be .~edica.ted . for. public use.
'(1) :·P~oposed.-~ain~'s for all streets .i:~-~ the .area being

r■

~

I

-

Ill

' platted.

·· · ·

·

··

(m) .Written and, s·igped statem~~ts explaining how
and when the subdivide~- proposes to provide and install
all required sewers or other disposal of sanitary wastes,
pavem~nts, ;Sidewalks. and . dr,~:i,nage st;ruc;tures.• ,
..•. ,

(n) Written and sign~d stateme~ts/ .of. t _
he' appropriate
officials of the availability of gas, electricity and
. water to .;the propose~ subdiyisJon.
(o) Any restrictions prop~sed to be included in the
•· ., owne~.'s. declar.at~on o;f plat .. ·_ .,

1

I

�I
I
I

II

I
I

II

I

II

B-8

SECTION

FINAL. ;PLAT
·_
··" .REQUIREMENTS
.· .
. :; _.
.. . . .

V

,

The Final .Pla,t ..s'1all ..be c _learly and legibly drawn to
one inch to. ·one hundred feet ·or less and in ink on
tracing ' cloth
~:ny . ot°her
s~it~~l.e pe,rmanent
base.
. .
.
_

1.

of

a . scafe

or·

. .•

~

.

The Plat Sb.a ll Show:,

2.

.
(a) r1,ie title unde,r which ~he subdiy_ision: is to be
r~corded.
. .· ..·
. .·

(b)

The name or names· .of the ow~ers and subdividers.

. . . (c) _Th~ date, sqal_e and northpoint, . and a key map
~hoiirig the ieneral loc~t~on of the prQposed subdivision.
(d)

II
11

The legal descript_ion

·of

the area be'ing platted.

(e) Accur~te, distanc~s' and bearings of all _b oundary
· lines o{ the subdivision_ iric1udin·g all sections_, · u. s.
Survey and Congressional township lines. . .

''II
11

'

11
11

(f)
Cent~rlines ot all propose~~nd. adjoining streets
with their right-of-way· widt_h and_ ,names,• .

(g) . Lines _of al~ lots . wi:th a . simple method of numbering to identify all lots' ~nd bl_o cks. _·. '. _
(h) All building lines and all easements provided
for public service together ~i th _· their dimens'ion:s and
any limitations of the easements.

11
11
I

(i) ·. Any arid all 'dimen~ions ,-necessary for . accurate
location of the.boundaries of the site' to be developed
and of all. streets, lots, e&lt;\sements and dedic.a ted areas.
These dimensions shall ' be expressed in feet a~d decimals
of a foot.
Al;I. :r~dii, . arcs, points , of t~ngency·, _: ce.nt~al
angles . and lengths of curves~
. , .·.·
(j)

(k)
Certification' by a registe-~ed· land surveyor that
th_e final plat. as. shown is a 9orrect represe.ntation of
the· SU!Vey' ·as made.
. .
..
. . .
·,
(1)
All survey monuments and benchmarks', .together
with tpeir descripti~n!
•

·,.

,

..

" f

• ·

(m) Private restrictive ·covenants and their . period
of existence.

lj
1,
I

~I

1r

�1
.a-.9
(n) The accurate outline, dimensions and purposes
of all property which is offered for dedication or is to
be reserved for acquisition ~o~ pubJic us~, or is to be
· reserve·c f j:,y deed covenant ;£or . the common us.e of the prop. ·. ez;ti.'owli~l's. :i)-1 the suJ:&gt;diyisi9,n.
. .

SECTION VI - DESIGN STANDARDS
_ 1. All subdiv:i s.ions -sb,all. c'onf¢'~m. ·to the minimum design
standards of this section.
.
2.

Streets:

(a) The street : and . aliey arrang·~ro'ent shall be such
as to cause no hardship ;t o owner.s of ad~oining property
~hen they· seek to shbdi*ide th~ir land~. ;
(b) The arrangement of str~ets shall make provisions for continuation of _the pr"incipal existing streets
in adjoining areas.
·
·
{c)

Otf-s~t streets shall be a~oid~d.

{d) The right-of-way width . for major -stre~ts shall
conforlll to the . Major· Thoroughfare Plan of t _b e Comprehensive .Plan and to all subsequent amendmen~s or. additions
thei·eto.
(e) The minimum right-of-way width for minor streets
shall b~ 50 feet.
(f) When streets adjoin unsubdivided property, a
half-street not less than 30 feet in width may be dedicated, and whenever the subdivided property adjoins a
half-street, the remainder of the street shall be dedicated.
· ··
· ·
(g) Proper access ·shall be given to all _lots from
a d~dicated stre·e t.
·
(h) All dead-end streets shall terminate in an open
space having a minitmim radius _o f . 50 feet. No . dead-end
streets .shall e~crea· eoo f~et in length.
{i) Reserve · sti-_:i.ps controlling· access to stre·e ts
-· shall be pr6hibi ted. .. ·
.. .
(j) A tangent of at least 100 feet long shall be
placed between reverse curves on major streets; on minor
streets such tangents shall be at least 50 feet long.

�B-10
• ,:'

.

·' · . ' · ('a-) · Th:e lot: a:'rr·a ngerifent·. and design shall be such
·· ., :· : ·, t-ba t all · Io·ts ·w ill · pt-oviae: satisf·a cto·r-y and de·sirable
building sites proper·1y rela·ted · to topography and the
character of adjacent development.
•

t

•

I

•

(b) All side lines of lots shall be at right angles
to· . straight street lin-es
·ta.dial · to curved street lines
unless a variation of this rule will· givB · a bette~ street
and lot plan.

or

.

~

..

Lots with double frontage shall be avoided.

(c)

• : ~•

•

~

I •

•

r

I

. •

•

~

•·

•

• •

'

•

'· (d) · Access from a· publi"G:: st'reet shall be provided
·
for all lots.- ;.•·., ·

(e) ' No ' lot shall have a'· depth' of · less than 100 feet
or a ' depth in excess of thr'ee: · t-imes· its ··width. · .
(f) The minimum width of residential lots shall be
60 feet at -t he . buil·d ing : lines... · ·

· • (g) No lot that- is'· to be used· for reside1ntial pur. · poses shall· contain· an · area · of less·•than 7; 500- ·square
feet.· provided;i. however,, that- ali; lots shall conform in
area to any city zoning regulation.
· . (b) Lots at; int-ersections of major ·streets and at
all acute angle intersections shall · ha·v e : a radius' of
20 feet at the street corner.
.. ·-::- :
4. ·Building Lines: ·

· (a)

Building lines sh·a ·ll be ·shown on all lots•· intended for residential use and on commercial a'nd · industrial lots immediately adjoining residential areas. Such
· building lines shall ·not · b:e les·s than the requirements
of any zoning ordinance or regulatio"n, at1d in no case
shall such building lines be less than 25 feet from the
right-of-way of the·1street : or highway: upon which the lot
·. fronts, ·· exd~pt that ' where all.· frontage on :· one side of a
street between .· two inte·rsecting ··s treets· o'r ·. for a distance
of 300 feet or more is to be used for commercial or indus·t rial :p urpose·s; ' said ihi'nimum bui'l'ding· lines.' shall not
be less than 20 feet.
'· · · ,, ;-:. · · ·· !
,.
.

. .
:

•,

•,

•

I•,

I .

•:.

•

..

•'

(I
.I

~
11

I

I

11

I

I

�r. ,;--_ _______________..:.:=====================;;;;;;;

11
11
W1

•
..

!

(b) Restrictions requiring buildings . to be set back
to such building lines shall either be shown on the plat
or shall be contained in a separate .recorded instrument
and referred to ~n t~e plat.
·
5.

Open Spaces Other Than Streets: '

(a) Where the area being subdivided includes lands
to be used for parks under the officially adopted Comprehensive Plan, the subdivider shall indicate the location of such areas on the subdivision plat ··and shall grant
a two-·y ear option 'for the purchase of such · lands or easements by the appropriate public agency at the appraised
value prior to subdividing plus one-half the cost of grading and surfacing of the portions . of any streets that are
contiguous to the site.
(b) Said option may be taken up by the ap·p ropriate
public agency upon the· payment · to the subdivider ·of 10
· percent of the total purchase price; total purchase: price
being the price plus pro-rata street costs. ·said amount
shall serve as either earnest money, ' · in the event the purchase is not completed, or shall be applied on the purchase price if. the purchase ·is completed as hereinafter
provided~ The balance of the purchase price; · phis interest computed at the current bank rate, shall be payable over a period of not to exceed 12 months or the remainder of the current fiscal year, whichever i's shorter.
(c) In case of a disagreement over the value of the
land, said value shall be established by three qualified
appraisers, one of whom shall be appointed by the purchasing public agency, one of whom shall be appointed by the
subdivider and one of whom shal~ be mutually agreed upon
by the two appraisers named above. The subdivider shall
bear the cost of any· appraisa:1. · ·If the option is not taken
up within two years as· prb~i~ed hereinaiter, or if the
purchase is not completed within the applicable period of
ttme, then the subdivider may ··sell or use the lands for an
alternate purpose, which alternate purpose shall be shown
on the approved subdivision plat.
6.

Alleys:

Where there are alleys, the minimum width shall be 20
feet. A cut-off shall be provided at all acute angle alley
intersections. Dead-end alleys shall not be allowed.

1
l
I
I

I

�B-i2
,7 .

. Eas~ments:

.

i

(a) . •Where, there · are .no .alleys, easements of at
least seven and one-half .f.eet in width shall be provided and dedicated on each side of all rear lot lines
and along side lot· ·lines where necessary for poles,
wires, conduits, ·s·torm "aiicf ·sari:i. ta.r y. s·ewers, gas, water
. an~ other: mains. .
·· · ·
·
l·,

•

• •

•

!

'·'

(b), . An. adequate easement sha:11 be 'dedicated · along
all import.ant watercourses for ·the · purpose ·of widening,
deepening, .. sloping, .. improving or protecting the , stream
for drainage ~urposes.
,8..

Character: of Development·:

. ..:

(a) The Planning Commission shall confer with the
, · subdivider regardi-ng the ·type. and character of · developm~nt that -will be permitted itr the subdivisioft, J ~nd may
agree with the subdivider 1 as' to ct9rta·1 n·! minimum ·restrictions to be placed. upon the property ·to· prevent· the con, struction of sub~tandard buildings; -to contrc&gt;l·' tb.~·' type
and use of sti;-uctures:: or the use· bf lots ·which, · unless so
controlled, · would cleatly d~pree~ate the- ~ha~act~r ' and
value of. the proposed subdi visitm: and o'.f. adj'o'ining property~ .\ ,·. ,
·
·
: ·' ··
·
;

.

•

'•

I

'

-

. (b) · .·The Commission shall· have&lt;power to agk-ee · With
the subdivider upon the use, height, area or bulk restrictions gove-rning. building and·.premises, providing
~hat eaid restrictiorts . do ndt i kuthorize· the violation
of, any zoning .regulation of the City.
·· · · ·
(c) ,6~ed- re~t~ictions . and covenahts shall .not contain rev.ersionary clauses wherein,·any lot shall :return
to th~ subdivideribecause of a violation· of · the terms of
·. the restrict~ons or covenants.
9.

Maintenance of Improvemetlts iOutsideCorporate Limits:

Where a subdivision outside the - corporate limits of a
municipality contains sewers, sewage treatment plants, water
supply systems, park areas, street trees or ot~er physical
facilities necessary or desirable for the welfare of the area
and. ,whi~h. are of comm,on use -or benefit and which "the municipali:ty do(?$,. ~ot :desire to or cannot maintain, provision sha:11
be .made by : trust agreements made a part of the deed restriritions acceptable to the City Council for the proper and continuous maintenance and supervision of such facilities by the
lot owners in the subdivision.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

�SECTION VII - IMPROVEMENTS

• \...

:

·:

1 ~ ' ·.-·

:

&gt;,

,I

1. Authorization to -P repare • . -=Receipt of the signed copy
of the preliminary plan is authorization for · the subdivider to
proceed with the preparation of plans and specifications for
the ·minimum improvement~ _:.:.~ Pa.t _wilJ.. p~ __ !"equired~ Prior to the
construction of any improvements, the· subdivider shall furnish
the City Engineer all plans, information and data necessary for
the construction of sa-id improvements. These plans shall be
examined by the City Enginee'r ·and will be approved if in accordance with the :following r -e quirements. Following the approval,
construction can be st_a rted. The subdivider '- may prepare and
secure approval of the preliminary plan and then install improvements only · in a pottiori . of.- ·: the area covered by the preliminary plaa.
· :'
··

2. Completion of Improvements. Plans for improvements
shall be pr·epared by a qualified engineer ·r egistered in accordance vJith the laws of M-icbigan.' The improvements listed below
shall -be installed prior to the ·~pproval bf the final plat which
is prepared for recording purposes. In lieu of actual completion of said improvements, the City Council may accept a performance bond assuring _tbe'. act.tialconstrUctioii and installation
of such improvements ·and utilitfes within a r'easona.ble time, and
with the · provision that · no ·· residence or· other building shall be
constructed uritil' the street improvement~; , water •hd sewer lines
have been instal-led for ' the entire block in which t :be residence
or other building shall be located. Sidewalks may be installed
after the construction of each residence or other building.
3. · · Thei ,i:mprovements to be installed shall •include the
foll,9w~ng: -·.·
(a) Perniarie:n t Markers. All subdivision. boundary
corners and the intersections· of street cen·teriines
shall be marked ·with permanen't nionum_e nt$ as _r equired
by the - City Engineer.
A permanent moritime·nt shall be
deemed to be concrete with a minimum dimension of four
inches, extending three feet below the surface of the'
ground, or steel pipe firmly imbedded ~n concrete which
extends at least three feet . below.the. surface of the
ground·. Should con~i tions prohibi\ the_. placing of
monuments on line, off-i;;et marking: w:11:t be 'p ermitted;
provid.ed, however ', that of:f-set · courses and dist'ances
ar:e shc;nvn on the plat. A ·perm·a n'eht ben,bh. I,nark ; ~hall
b'e acc'e ssibly placed .wit1,1iit the _ s'ubdivi$ibit, '. the· e).evation of which shall be re'f erred to . the ··u;s·.ci'.S~ ..
datum arid a~curateiy noted on. the · subdivisi:o n plat'. ,
..

.

'•

·.

.

�I

B-14

(b) Street Improvements. All . str·eets sha11 · be
graded and the roadway improved by surfacing under
,(.~. · · th~, supervision .of: the C~p_y :·-~_nl5~.1?-~!:?r .~.a ~9 --~_u}~j~~-t to
:·.-: .bis . approval •. •..
\ ..~:. .- · r: , · ·;·: · •: ·. ,, ·, • .. . · ... , 1.• , •
.:! . ·- ,:, ·1

....

.t

~-

°.i :

.. ' ~1 ,.

'

;·

• •

l •~

, •.

: ~

• .

:. ~ . ; .

:~,
· ,; .· ·. · (1) For .Class l:Subdiv,isions; -. roadway ·snrfac- ·
. '-~· ,, · ·, , iing- shall i,n:clude· standard ·,curb. •and gutter ·on both
, . .,&lt;
, · ., S;ides of ..th.e
street :Iiot closer than ,30 · fe-~t from
. :· _ ·'. the . b_a ck. o.f .one .curb-,t,o, ~the back of the ,other: with-· :
.the ar·e,a . between ·the · c;u rbs..: su;rfaced . with concrete
. or asphalt -me.e ti,ng .the st~ndard specifications of
.~he City of Gaylord •. ;
.: :

.

(2L For Class· 2 . Subdivisions, , roadway surfac-·
ing shall consist of concrete or asphalt paving,- ··.
at least 24 feet wide, constructed in accordance
:;-- - wi-th standard spe,cificat.ions -o f· the Ci.ty; of
.
. . . Gaylord with drairiage:,- di-fche~ where ·, appropriate ·
W:i th sl9pes no steeper. tJ:ian two feet ·- boriz.o.ntal
for each. one foot , yert~~al and - at~ least two feet ·
cleep.
. 1. : :_
- ,
:;

: . J.

(

•• •"

(3) Fo·r Major T·b oroughia-res, . i.e . 1 streets· so · ·
1
. design,ated on ·-the of_f ,iq:"i ·al· .Comprehensive . P.lan 1 the
, sur.facing ;shall· be_.. the:- same, as· for Class 1 Subdt,

.

:...:-

. visions_ e~cept th.a ,t tb-e s:urfacing:·sball- be at. a . . ·
width designa,ted by :the- City Council. · · .. ,
,•

(c) Sid~waiks
. . For- Class 1· Subdd. visions&gt; ; two sidewalks, shall be
required along all streets. For Class 2 Subdivisions,
two sidewalks shall be required along all major streets.
All _sj,dewal;lts: shall ha_v e a minitn\nn width" of four feet
anc( sha°I-1 , be constructed_-. under-: the .·supervfsion· of., and
i:;ubject. to the a.pp:roval of, . the City Engineer • . Sidefalks· ~ball . };).~ _lOCfl,te~ . o~e. foot. in$i.de the· s_tree t rightof-way line~ - · · . . .: i : i· . · . , · .
(d) . ·1 vater- L.i n~s •.-:, _,

t'~;:

. .For ~1.1_s _uqd';i._~ isions, .
~ub.divi_9er sl,lall pro. ,y_i9-e . ~µ .,ad_equ11-t~ supply . of, potable y.,.a:ter.'. _to •each lot by
· a water : s.y'i;;"tem appr9ved . by. the, State. pepartment. of. Heal th
···with pr~oper provlsic:&gt;.ns _.for the inai,hteJ,lance thereof .as
requir-~d· 'by , ~ar'ag,r "apb,', 9. o_
f , $ectip'J;l 6 . :o't . this . Regula,tion;
or s _l:iall ' serye , each,: _19t:. with ·.,a water ~ai_n._of.; a, municipal
water · system; or .where _i t is .t.easible. and practical for
an ; ~,ct'~qu'~ te wate'r • supply to . be made available · for e'v ery

I
I
II

�i

'
'
'
'
'•
•f
•
•
•
•,
,
'
'i
I

i

B.:..15

lot by the individual lot - owner, to present evidence to
this effect and "include deed : te·s t'rictions on the final
plat · requiring any such individual watersupply · systeni
to comply with the requirements of the State Department'
of Health.
·. ,!

·(e)

Sewers.

For all Subdivisions,' the · subdivider shall con-,
nect with a public sanitary sewer system when available,
and provide adequat~ sewer lines accessible to each lot.
When a publi'c sanitary sewer _s ystem· is ·not available,
individual sewage · di~posal devices may be used· for ·each
lot, but the subdivision plat shall include deed restrictions requiring that all such individual disposal
systems · shall·be consfructed in accordan6e with the
specifications of the· State Department 'of Health· and ·
under the · supervision of·and subject to ·the approval
of the City Engineer.
(f)

Drainage.

Adequate provisions shall be .made for drainage
of storm water stibject to the approval ot . the City Engineer. Drainage improvements shall maintain any natural
watercourse and shall -prevent the collection of water in
any low spot. · When public storm · drainage systems are
available, su·b divisions· shall utilize them! ··' When no public storm drainage system is available, · drainage shall be
by open channels located along the street$ or along rear
lot lines. No lot shall be platted to obstruct· natural
water flow •
(g)

Alleys.

Alleys shall be graded to their maxi'mum usable
width to a grade approved by the Qity Engiµeer.

SECTION VIII - EXCEPTIONS
1. Modification of Requirements.
Where in the case of a
particular proposed subdivision,· it can be shown that strict
compliance with the requirements of this· Regulation would result in extraordinary ha~dship to : the subdivider because of
unusual topography; or other such non-self inflicted conditions
or that these conditions would' ·result in •inbibi ting the achievement· of the objectives of- this ·Re·gu·1ation,· the Planning Commission may vary, modify, or waive ~h~ require~ents so · that stibstantial justice may be done and the public interest secured;

�I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I

provided , that such variance,. modifi.cat.ion ::or waiv.er will not
have the .:effect ·of nullifying- :the ! intent. and purpose .of this
Reg.ula;tion. :or:·_. interfening with carrying out the. Comprehensive
Plan •. ·. , : -,.:;- .: ·; , ..
. .. r··-:,; _..,-;. -__
• ·, 1
. • l _l

In no case shall any variation or modification be more
than a minimum easing of the requirements~ In no case shall
it have the effect of reducing the traffic capacity of any
-street . below t hat . ·s hown. on the , Gomprehensi ve. Plan or be in
conflict with -any zoning regulatio-n · and · map . :
• Such _v..ariances and .w_a i vers. -m ay be , granted · only by · the
affi r mative vote of three-fourths •.o f the ·members of the Planning Commission. ·. 1
;,. ·.•
. : .'
In granting• variances and modif'ica tibris,. · the Planning
Commission may .require such condftions ': as will, ir1--i ts judgment', .sec11re .substantially the objectives o:f the requirements
so varied or modified.
•

I

SECTION IX - CHANGES AND AMENDMENTS
. .. .. 1. ·. Changes and: Amendments. · . 'Any; regulations or provi··sioris ·o·f this Regulatio~. .may ibe . 1changed and 'amend'e d ' from time
to time- by the City Co.unc'i 1 ; . ·provided•, however, · ·t hat· such
. changes or amendments· shall not become·.•.effective· ·until after
a public" hearing has been held·, ·pub•lic notice :of · wl:iicl:i shall
have been·:.g iv.en in a newspaper' of general circulation ·tn the
City ·. at -least. fiftee.n 'days prior·, ;ta: such ' hearing ~-

SECTION, X - VALIDITY 1. Validity.
If any section, subsection, sentence ,
clause or phrase of this Regulation is fo;r. ~J;l.Y. reason held
to be unconstitutional or void, such decision shall not invalida,t e the. remaining -portio.ns · of t.his Regulation.

SECTION XI - PENALTIES
1. Penalties. Whoever, being the owner or agent of the
. owner of . any :.land •;located__ .~ ~~~i~•· :t .h e '._C?-_ty _.o:t:q~ylord, .knowingly
or ;wi,th •in:t end to defr.aud,: ·tr,ansfers -or, sells by · reference .to
or ~xhibition ,of or by other -use~~f. :a ,plat of subdivision ~f
such land before such -pla.:t has •. been approved · by · the City Council,
shall forfeit ,and pay th.e ·.penalty of not more. than fifty dollars
..($50. 00) for each .:lot so :transferred . or sold · or agreed . or negotiated to :_be sold, . and 1a description . b.yr.metes· and bounds shall
not. exempt the transact.ion . from ·such penalties.
., .
., · .
. .,

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

I

~

B-17

SECTION XII - CONFLICTING REGULATIONS REPEALED
1. Conflicting Regulations Repealed. All regulations
or parts of regulations in conflict herewith are hereby repealed, except any regulation that imposes more restrictive
regulations than are imposed herein.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008344">
                <text>Gaylord_Preliminary-Report-Comprehensive-Plan_1965</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008345">
                <text>Harland Bartholomew and Associates</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008346">
                <text>1965-09</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008347">
                <text>Preliminary Report Comprehensive Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008348">
                <text>The Preliminary Report Comprehensive Plan for the City of Gaylord was prepared by Harland Bartholomew and Associates in September 1965.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008349">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008350">
                <text>Gaylord (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008351">
                <text>Otsego County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008352">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008354">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008355">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008356">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008357">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038328">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54702" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58973">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/bfca2aa0acf45efb5ebf83a6325191fb.pdf</src>
        <authentication>18232c7c6f894e4481f8662fe9fefa86</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008343">
                    <text>.... THE CITY OF GAYLORD STRONGLY ENCOURAGES THE USE OF THE SWISS ALPINE MOTIF IN
THE CONSTRUCTION AND/OR RENOVATION OF ALL COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS IN THE CITY OF
GAYLORD TO MAINTAIN, ENHANCE AND TO PROMOTE "GAYLORD, THE ALPINE VILLAGE" AND TO
SYMBOLIZE THE CITY'S RELATIONSHIP WITH ITS SISTER-CITY, PONTRESINA, SWITZERLAND .

•

PREAMBLE, CITY OF GAYLORD ZONING ORDINANCE

OAYL0R'D

G

~a,@t

MUNICIPAL STANDARDS FOR THE
CITY OF GAYLORD
OTSEGO COUNTY, MICHIGAN
1992 EDITION

PREPARED BY:
CAPITAL CONSULTANTS, INC.
P.O. BOX 1398
GAYLORD, Ml 49735
TELEPHONE: (517) 732-8131
FAX: (517) 732-•2 714
CITY OF .GAYLORD
225 WEST MAIN STREET, ROOM 109
GAYLORD, Ml 49735
TELEPHONE: (517) 732-2815
FAX: (517) 732-8266
CITY MANAGER; DAVE SIEGEL

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

MUNICIPAL STAJ\1)ARDS
FOR THE
CITY OF GAYLORD
OTSEGO COUNTY, MIClilGAN

GENERAL
Introduction
Definitions
Regulatory Constraints
Subdivision Control Act of 1962
Inland Lakes and Streams Act of 1972
Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Act of 1972
State and Local Building Codes
State Construction Permits
Subdivision Control Ordinances
Administrative Procedures and Fees

G-1
G-1
G-2

G-3

STANDARDS OF DESIGN
Streets and Roadways
Driveways
Sanitary Sewers
Storm Sewers
Water Distribution Systems
Site Grading
Table of Standard Castings and Valves

SD-1
SD-4
SD-22
SD-26
SD-29
SD-32
SD-34

STAl\TJ)ARDS OF CONSTRUCTION - UTILITY
COMPANY CONSTRUCTION

BIBLIOGRAPHY

GAYLORD
MS-I
91527.12

UC-1

B-1

TOC-1

�11111

1111
1111
1111
1111

•

11111

Ill
111

Iii
1111

-•Ill
Ill
1111

•

STANDARD OF CONSTRUCTION - SPECIF1CATIONS
SECTION

NUMBER

PAGES

SOILS COMP ACTION M1D TESTING
•
SPECIAL CONTROLS
SITE PREPARATION
SHEETING M1D BRACING
ROADWAY EARTHWORK
EXCAVATION FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS
BEDDING AND BACKFILLING FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS
BORING, JACKING &amp; TUN1'.TELING FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE
BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SURFACE COURSE
CONCRETE CURB &amp; GUTTER
CONCRETE SIDEWALK.S
WATER MAINS
CONCRETE UTILITY MM1HOLES &amp; CATCH BASINS
RAW SEWAGE FORCE MAINS
STORM SEWERS
SANITARY SEWERS
RESTORATION AND CLEANUP
TOPSOILING AND SEEDING
SODDING
CONCRETE
MORTAR M1D GROUT

01410
01560
02110
02161
02211
02222
02223
02227
02231
02512
02513
02525
02528
02665
02715
02717
02722
02732
02901
02936
02938

1-4
1-4
1-4
1-2
1-4
1-4
1-6
1-4
1-2
1-2
1-3
1-2
1-2
1-8
1-3
1-7
1-4
1-8
1-2
1-3
1-3
1-3
1-2

03001
03600

STANDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION - STAND ARD DETAILS
TRENCH BACKFlLL DETAILS
STANDARD SANITARY MANHOLE
STANDARD DROP PIPE DETAIL
SANITARY SERVICE CONNECTIONS
SM1ITARY SERVICE LEAD DETAIL
STANDARD STORM MANHOLE
STANDARD CATCH BASIN
STANDARD MANHOLE - 24" TO 48" PIPE
HYDRANT DETAIL
WATER SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL
PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAIL
CONCRETE DRIVEWAY OPEN1NG
SIDEWALK DETAILS
STANDARD STREET AND UTILITY LAYOUT
TYPICAL ROADWAY CROSS-SECTION
STANDARD CURB &amp; GUTTER DETAIL
BORE &amp; JACK DETAILS
GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

TOC-2

SC-1
SC-2
SC-3
SC-4
SC-5
SC-6
SC-7
SC-8
SC-9
SC-10
SC-11
SC-12
SC-13
SC-14
SC-15
SC-16
SC-17

�ill
111
Ill
Ill

111
Iii
Iii
Ill
Ill

INTRODUCTION
The design and construction standards for subdivision and land development contained in this
publication are intendecl as guidelines to be used by the Developer in the preparation and final
plats, development plans, and final construction documents. These standards should be utilized
in conjunction with local zoning and subdivision ordinances, the State of Michigan Subdivision
Control Act, and other applicable State and local regulations to produce residential and
commercial developments which conform to the City's requirements.

DEFii'\TfIONS
(1)

OWNER OR DEVELOPER- A natural person, finn, corporation, association, partnership,
or other entity who proposes subdivision or other land development and/or municipal
improvements and who either has an ownership interest therein or is authorized to act as
an agent with respect thereto for an entity having such ownership interest.

(2)

MUNICIPALITY - The City of Gaylord.

•Ill

(3)

ENGTh1EER OR CITY ENGINEER - The person, firm, or corporation empowered by the
City of Gaylord to provide the required engineering review and inspection services.

(4)

DESIGN ENGTh1EER - The engineer engaged by the developer to prepare platting
documents and plans and specifications for subdivisions or plans and specifications in
unplatted land developments.

Ill

(5)

CONTRACTOR - The person, firm, or corporation engaged by the developer for
construction services in conjunction with the proposed land development.

Ill

(6)

MUNICIPAL STANDARDS - The minimum standards for design and construction for
all work related to subdivisions and land development.

(7)

MDOT - Michigan Department of Transportation

(8)

MDNR - Michigan Department of Natural Resources

(9)

MDPH - Michigan Department of Public Health

•Ill

Ill
Ill
Ill
Ill

GAYLORD
MS-1
9152?:12

G-1

�ill

•
•
•
•
•
•
•II
II
II
Ii
Ii

II
11

REGULATORY CONSTRAINTS
Subdivision Control Act of 1967
In 1967, the Michigan Legislature enacted Public Act 288, the Subdivision Control Act of 1967,
which gives the local units of government in Michigan the authority required to assure that new
subdivisions conform to sound subdivision practices, retain their beauty and value and that they
remain an asset, not a liability, to the community.
A Manual of Instructions of implementing Act 288 is available from the State Department of
Treasury, Bureau of Local Government Services. The Manual of Instruction includes step by step
regulations for preparation of the preliminary and final plats as well as the rules and regulations
of the Departments of Treasury, Transportation, Natural Resources and Public Health.
Inland Lakes and Streams Act of 1972
The Inland Lakes and Streams Act (Act 346) was enacted to control construction operations in
flood plains. A construction permit may be required and can be obtained from the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) .
Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Act of 1972
The Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Act (Act 347) was enacted to control soil erosion
and sedimentation which could enter the State's watercourses through public or private
construction operations. Any construction involving an "eanh change" as defined in the Act,
must obtain a construction permit from the County enforcing agency. The agent for Act 347 is
the Otsego County Building and Zoning Department Developers are directed to contact the
Building Department for permit applications and additional information. Also refer to Section
01560 "Special Controls" of the "Standards of Construction - Specifications" section of these
standards.
State and Local Buildini Codes
The City of Gaylord has adopted the State of Michigan code for basic building. The state code
will be enforced by Otsego County for mechanical, plumbing and electrical work.
State Construction Permits
Upon receipt of approved plans and specifications from the Developer, the City will make
applications for permits to the Michigan Department of Public Health for the water main
construction and to the Michigan Department of Natural Resources for the sanitary sewer
construction.
All other required permits shall also be secured by the Developer prior to construction.
GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

G-2

�•

1111

91

Iii

-II
II
II
II
II

-II

II
II
II
II
II
II

Subdivision Regulation Ordinance
In addition to these Municipal Standards, the City of Gaylord has a comprehensive subdivision
ordinance in effect which outlines the subdivision procedure, design layout standards,
improvements, review ' fees, and penalties for violation of the ordinance. Developers are
encouraged to review the requirements of the subdivision ordinance at the outset of their planning
and design work.

ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES A~TJ) FEES
General
All correspondence, verbal requests, submission of plans, and related information exchanges shall
be directed to the City Manager of the City of Gaylord during normal business hours or by mail.
Appropriate distribution of information, plans, etc., shall be ma.de by the City. This applies to
information received from developers for the Engineer and information from the Engineer for the
developer. The intent of this section is to maintain, in the City offices, a copy of all
correspondence and related information for City use.

The Owner is directed to reference Article VIII "Review Fees" of Section 8108 "Jurisdiction and
Procedure" of Ordinance 17.00 "Subdivision Ordinance of the City of Gaylord" of the City of
Gaylord Compiled Ordinances for infonnation regarding plat review fees.
The Engineer shall provide an estimate of field inspection charges at the time of street and utility
plan approval. The estimated amount shall be deposited with the City by the Developer prior to
construction. The City shall disburse the funds to the Engineer.

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

G-3

�STA1"1DARDS OF DESIGN - STREETS AND ROADWAYS
Scope
These standards establish the minimum requirements for the design of streets and roadways in
the Municipality.
Plans and Specifications

Ill
II
II
II
II

II
II

•

1.

The plans and specifications shall be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the
State of Michigan.

2.

Plans shall consist of a cover sheet showing a location map and site plan of the proposed
project, plan and profile sheets covering all the proposed street and roadway construction,
and a standard detail sheet Plan sheet size shall be 24" x 36" or 22" x 34". Plan scale
shall be either 1" = 40' or 1" = 20' horizontally and l" = 5' vertically.

3.

Elevations shall be based upon U.S.G.S. datum. Elevations based upon assumed datum
will not be approved.

4.

Plan profiles shall indicate existing and proposed ground levels, U.S.G.S. elevations, and
stationing.

5.

Four sets of plans and specifications shall be submitted by the Developer to the
Municipality for preliminary approval. All plans and specifications submitted for
approval shall be sealed by the registered engineer in charge of design. Modifications
required to meet the municipal standards, if any, will be noted on two sets, with one such
set returned to the Developer for final corrections within 90 days of receipt

6.

Six sets of final plans and specifications shall be submitted by the Developer to the
Municipality for approval. All plans and specifications submitted for approval shall be
sealed by the registered engineer in charge of design.

7.

The Developer will be responsible for securing all State and local construction permits
required for street and roadway construction.

8.

One (1) set of reproducible "as-built" tracings, on mylar or polyester film, shall be
submitted to the Municipality upon completion of the construction.

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-1

�Ill

II

•
•
•
•
•
•
•II
-•
•
•
•ii
•
-II

Subsurface Soil Conditions
The Developer shall provide sufficient soil borings and other information to accurately describe
the prevailing soil conditions under the proposed streets and roadways. The minimum soil boring
depth shall be ten feet below the plan road grade, unless unstable soil conditions are encountered.
If such conditions are found, the boring depth shall be extended until stable soil is encountered .
Curb and Gutter
All streets and roadways shall include concrete curb and gutter of the cross-section indicated on
the standard detail. Bituminous curb v.ill not be allowed. On local streets the minimum street
width shall be 31' back to back of curb. Concrete curb and gutter width on major streets shall
conform to the "uniform Criteria for Major Streets" as adopted by the Michigan Department of
Transportation and the Municipality's Master Plan. At all intersections, the minimum curb radius
shall be 25', unless otherwise approved.
Sidewalk
Concrete sidewalks (where required) shall be five feet wide and shall be located one foot inside
right-of-way line. At all intersections of sidewalks and curb and gutter, appropriate pedestrian
ramps shall be constructed. Unless otherwise approved, the ramps shall be Type 1 as designated
by MDOT. The maximum allowable sidewalk grade shall be seven percent and the minimum
allowable grade shall be 0.50 percent Sidewalk shall have a cross slope of 1/4 inch per foot
away from the property line. Sidewalks shall project one inch above finished grade. In cut
sections, the maximum sidewalk elevation shall be one foot above the street centerline elevation.
In fill sections, the sidewalk elevation shall be no lower than 0.5 feet below the street centerline
elevation. Sidewalks shall be 4 inches thick except across residential driveways, which shall be
6 inches thick, and across commercial driveways, which shall be 10 inches thick.
Grade, Horizontal and Vertical Ali enment
The minimum vertical grade on any street or roadway shall be 0.50 feet per 100 feet and the
maximum grade on any street or roadway shall be 5 feet per 100 feet of length. In general, the
minimum length of a vertical curve shall be 100 feet, unless otherwise dictated by site
topography. In general, all intersections of streets or roadways shall be ma.de perpendicular to
each other. However. intersections ranging from 75° to 90° from perpendicular may be approved.
Additional information concerning street geometrics right-of-way v.idths, block length
requirements and other relevant requirements are available from the Municipality .
Driveway Approaches
All driveway approaches between the curb and gutter and sidewalk shall be paved with either
concrete or bituminous leveling or wearing course. Bituminous pavement shall consist of a
minimum of 330 pounds per square yard (3 inches) of MDOT No. 1100. Concrete driveway
approaches for residential sections shall be 6 inches thick and 10 inches for commercial
GAYLORD

MS-1
91527.12

SD-2

�•
•
-

approaches. The maximum grade on driveway approaches shall be 14 percent The width of the
driveway shall conform to the standard detail .
Rie:ht-of-way Width
•
Right-of-way width shall be a minimum of 66 feet for all public streets.

Utility Location \Vithin the Street Rie:ht-of-way
The utilities listed below shall be constructed in the designated location within all street right-ofways as follows:
Sanitary Sewers

on the centerline of the street

Storm Sewers

south or each side, 8 feet from the centerline of the right-ofway.

\Vater Main

north or west side, 23 feet from the centerline of the right-ofway.

Gas Main

south or east side, 23 feet from the centerline of the right-ofway.

0th er Utilities

as approved by the City Manager.

Street Surface Materials and Pavement Thickness
The following pavement design are minimum requirements for local streets with restricted wheel
loads. Pavement design for major streets shall reflect the increased traffic volume and higher
axle loads and shall be subject to approval by the Municipality. The base for local streets shall
consist of either 8 inches of compacted MDOT 22A gravel or 4 inches of MDOT No. 5
bituminous base constructed on an approved subbase. If the bituminous base is selected a bond
coat shall be applied to the bituminous base prior to the construction of a minimum of 2 inches
of MDOT No. 1100 L &amp; T, 20AA. If the gravel base is selected the pavement thickness shall
be 3 inches of MDOT No. 1100 L &amp; T, 20AA.

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-3

�-II
•
•
•
•II
•
•..

STANDARD OF DESIGN - DRIVE\VAYS

These standards establish the minimum requirements for the design of driveways m the
Municipality.
Driveway Pennits
Application for driveway pennit shall be required for all driveway construction and shall be filed
with the City of Gaylord. The driveway application shall be filed on a form provided by the
City. The driveway application shall contain information as required by the Michigan
Department of Transportation Driveway Pennit Rules R.247.221 through R.247.224 unless
otherwise waived by the City.
Desirn Standards
All driveways shall meet the Michigan Department of Transportation (MD01) Standards for
Driveway Construction contained in Rules R 247.231 through R 247.267. All references to the
"Department" shall be changed to the "City of Gaylord" .

II
II

II
II

•II

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-4

�•
•
•
•
•
•
"•
•
•
•
•
•II

PART 2.
R 247.221.

DRIVEWAY PERMITS

Applications •

Rule 21.
(1)
An application for a driveway permit shall
be accepted fro:n a property owner, goverrunental agency,
lessee, or its legally authorized agent.
(i) An application for a driveway permit shall be submitted in the ~anner prescribed on forms supplied by the
department. The application shall contain or be accompanied
' by a certification of either legal o~~ership or agency
authorization. The application shall be accompanied by plans
or drawings containing the information required by rule 22
and shall include the applicable design features required
by part 3 •
R 247.222.

Plans or drawings.

Rule 22. Copies of a driveway permit application shall
be accompanied by plans or drawings clearly indicating the
following features of the site and abutting highway as the
department may require:
(a)
Existing highvay pavement, ditches, right-of-way
and property lines, highway appurtenances, utilities,
medians, if existing, and dimensions thereof.
(b) For cOm.tilercial driveways, buildings, both proposed
and existing, and appurtenances and dimensions thereof,
including a notation as to present use of the buildings and
details of internal traffic circulation, parking and traffic
signs.
(c) Design features in accordance with part 3 of drive·ways,. tapers and right-turn lanes to be cons true ted, reconstructed, relocated, surfaced, resurfaced, operated, used
or maintained including the following dimensions and
features:
(i)
Widths of driveways.
(ii) Radii of driveway returns and other points of
curvature.
(iii) Driveway grades or profile view of drive, when
necessary.
(iv) Angle of the driveway relative to the highway
centerline •
(v)
Dimensions of traffic "islands adjacent to the
highway.
(vi) Driveway surface material and traffic island
surface material •
(d)
Distance from each existing and proposed driveway on
the site to:
(i)
Nearest intersecting street, road or highway.
(ii) Nearest driveway on adjacent properties •
(iii) Street, road, highway or driveways opposite the site •

I

4

GAYLORD
MS-1

91527.12 .

SD-5

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•II
II

(iv)
Property lines and pr o pe rty l i~e s extended to the
highway centerline.
(v)
Buildings and business appurte~ances on the site.
(e) Features in addition to drive~ays to be constructed
within the highway right-of-way including traffic control
islands, curb, sidewalks and authorized traffic signs.
(f) Existing and proposed drainage structures and
controls to include:
(i)
Size of drive culvert •
(ii) Type of culvert.
(iii) Type of culve~t end treatment.
(iv) Grade of culvert •
(v)
Direction of surface water flow on or from
adjacent property.
(g) North directional arrow •

R 247.223.

Specifications and design standards.

Rule 23. The design, location, construction and operation of driveways and related construction within the highway right-of-way shall meet requirements of the current
department Standard Specifications for Highway Construction
and the design standards required by part 3 of these rules.
A deviation therefrom shall be consistent with current and
projected traffic volumes on the highway a·nd on the driveway, adjacent development, equivalence of materials and
methods, and safety requirements of persons using the
driveways and highway. The deviation shall be authorized
only by the department.
R 247,224.

Conditions and limitations in permits •

Rule 24. A driveway permit is subject to the following
conditions and limitations:
(a) The department reserves the right of inspectio~ by
its authorized representatives of a driveway constructed
within a highway right-of-way. The permittee shall reimburse the department for the services of an on-the-job
inspection which may be required for I:1ajor commercial
developments or other special cases.
(b) The department or its representative may require
that it be given at least 5 days notice before commencement
of an operation covered by the permit.
(c) The permittee shall have a copy of the permit
available at the site during construction.
(d) The permittee shall take, provide and maintain
necessary precautions to prevent injury or damage to persons
and property from operations covered by the permit and shall
use warning signs and safety devices which are in accordance
with the current Michigan Manual of Uniform Traffic Control
Devices •

5

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-6

�•
•
•
•

(e) . The per:::i ttee shall surrender the permit and all
rights thereun~er when notified to do so by the department
because of its need for the area covered by the permit or
because of default of any provision of the permit. The
department may grant the person a new permit.
(f)
Altered natural drainage shall not be permitted to
flow onto the highway right-of-way unless special provisions
are approved by the department.
(g)
The perwit holder shall remove all surplus materials
, to an area outside of the highway right-of-way unless the
permit provides for disposal at locations within the highway
right-of-way. Excavated material shall be stockpiled so it
does not adversely affect the safety of traffic.
(h)
Work authorized by the permit shall be completed to
the satisfaction of the department on or before the completion date· specified in the· permit. A request for an extension of time for cornpletion•of this work shall include reasons for the request. Approval of extension of time shall
be based on extenuating circumstances and absence of neglect
by the permittee.
(i)
The property owner or his agent shall maintain the
driveways set forth in the permit.
R 247.226.

Indemnity and Insurance.

Rule 26.
A permittee shall save harmless the department
against any claim for damages arising from his negligence
or his contractor's negligence in operations covered by the
permit. Certificates of insurance may be required in case
of a commercial driveway to insure claims for damage or
personal injury. General liability . insurance carried by an
applicant or contractor is acceptable.
R 247.227.

Performance bonds.

Rule 27.
(1) A performance bond shall be required by a
permit which is issued for construction or reconstruction of
a commercial driveway to protect the department against the
cost of completing construction or correcting deficiencies.
A reaso:1able a::;cunt c-f coverage cf the bond shall be determined by the department. A bond shall not b.e required from
a governmental agency.
(2)
Acceptable types of bonds may be a certified check
or money order payable to the department or a surety bond
executed on forms obtainable from the department~

6

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-7

�ill
ill
ill

•
•
"•
"I

II

II
II

•
•
•

PART 3.
R 247.231.

DRIVEWAY DESIGN STASDARDS

Driveway locations.

Rule 31.
(1)
A driveway shalt be so located that no
undue interference with the free movecent of highway traffic
will result.
A driveway shall be so located also to provide
the nost favorable vision and grade conditions possible for
motorists using the highway and the driveway consistent with
development of the site considering proper traffic operations
and safety.
'
(2) A driveway, including the radii but not including
the right-turn lanes and tapers, shall be located entirely
within the area between the permittee's property lines
extended to the centerline of the highway.
A driveway
radius may extend outside of that area only if the adjacent property owner certifies in writing that he will permit such extension.
(3)
If the driveway is to be located adjacent to a
highway intersection, the following shall apply:
(a)
If the intersecting highway is curbed, the point of
curvature of the driveway radius shall be at least 20 feet
from the point of curvature of the in~ersecting highway
radius.
(b)
If the intersecting highway is uncurbed, the point
of curvature of the driveway radius shall be at least 50
feet from the edge of pavement of the intersecting highway.
(c) ~~en an existing highway or driveway is reconstructed or the requireme1its in paragraphs (a) or (b) cannot be
applied, the driveway radius shall not encroach upon the
intersection radius unless such encroachment is physically
unavoidable.
(4) A driveway shall not be constructed along the acceleration or deceleration lanes and tapers connecting to
interchange ramp terminals, unless no other reasonable'
access point is available.
R 247.232.

Clear vision and buffer areas.

Rule 32.
(1)
At an intersection or railroad crossing
where the department owns li~ited access right-of-way to
provide a clear vision area, a driveway shall not enter or
cross that clear vision area.
At an intersection or railroad crossing where the department has an easement for a
clear vision area, a driveway shall not enter or cross that
clear vision area if another reasonable access point is
available.

7

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-8

�(2) Adjacent to and on bot~ si~es of a drive~ay, a
b ffer area between ~he r!ght-cf-way line and the pavecent
edge shall be used, as deterr:~~ed by the departnent, to
provide a physical barrier bet~een highway traffic and
activity on private property.
A buffer area is needed to
provide an unobscured vision area and to prevent potentially
hazardous movement of vehicles, especially at undesirable
angles of approach, from and to the highway.
The b'.lffer
area shall consist of a lawn area, a low shrub area, a ditch
or equivalent.• Where encroacl:r.,ent of vehicle parking on the
buffer area takes place or may take place, the department
may require the buffer area to be established by guardrail,
guard posts, curb or equivalent.
R

247.233.

Design Features.

Rule 33.
The design features described in this rule and
illustrated in figure ], . shall be used by the applicant in
dimensioning a proposed drive~ay or driveway system on plans
accompanying the driveway pe:-r:i t application.
The dir:ens ions
to be used for various dri ve,.-ay design features, sho,.-n as a
standar wi t:i a -.:;orking range of di:censions, are given in
tables
to 7, rules 37 to ~9.
'rnese sta dard dicensions
shall :,e used •nless co:iditio:is ,;.·arrar.t a c.evia~ion, The
depart:e~~ =ay s_ecify pari::c :ar c:.::.e::siocs so a ~a.::-tic lar
cri ·e-.ay s;s:e= -;,il accc::.::.o · a~e ve icle .::.OYe=en·s i:::o::-=ally
ex?ecte ~i-~o · t creating ·~·~e co~gestion or r.azar o ~ the
::igb•~ay or to pro·.•:~e reaso,.a· _e access.
.e let•en; i.:1 the
:ollo-·ii:g design feat res re:er o :ea~ res i::i figu.::-e l:
(a)
Intersecting a:.g_e, A, ,:. e c_oc-;...-,:,ise angle f.::-o::i. a
l:Jigllway centerl'ne to a drive;.ay reference line ...-~ich :s the
centerl ne or the edge of the drive~ay.
(b)
Driveway width, B, the distance between drive~ay
edges of pave □ ent or edges of the gravel surfa~e weasured at
the point where the edges of the driveway beco:ce parallel,
point b in figure 1.
If the right-of-way line is so close
to the pavement that point b falls on the applicant's property, then the widt!J of the crive ..·ay at the right-of-way
line shall be based on the projected driveway width.
(c)
Entering radius, C, the radius of a driveway ecge
curve on the right side of a vehicle entering the applicant's
property.
(d)
Exiting radius, D, t e radius of a driveway edge
curve on the right side of a vehicle leaving the applicant's
property.
(e)
Curb ending, E, the length of the height transition
of the driveway curb from gro nd level to full curb height
along a:-1 u curbed h igh"'ay.
Th is curb transition may be
10 feet raini.J:lu::i.
(f)
Right-turn lane length, F, the length of an auxiliary
lane constr•cted receding the drive~ay to accorr~odate rightturn traffic entering the i:.pplicant 's proper_~Y·,·
8

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-9

�ill
ill
IJI

•
•II
•
•
•
-

(g) Right-turn lane width, G, the width edge-to-edge of
a right-turn lane, or the width edge-to-edge at the full
width of entering and exiting tapers.
(h)
Entering taper, H, the length of a pavement widening, preceding the driveway for a right-turn lane - or taper.
(j) Exiting taper, J, the length of a pavement narrowing, following the driveway.
(k) Entrance drive width, K, the wijth of the portion
of a divided or a directional driveway that is used by a
vehicle entering the a_pplicant 's property.
(1) Exit drive width, L, the width of the portion of a
divided or a directional driveway that is used by a vehicle
leaving the applicant's property.
(m)
Island width, M, the edge-to-edge distance between
an entrance drive and an exit drive.
(n)
Island length, N, the distance between ends of the
island, measured parallel to the entrance drive.
(p) Nose offset, P, the distance between the edge of
pavement and the traffic island of a divided or directional
driveway.
(r) Curb cut, R, the length of the opening along a highway curb for a straight-sided residential driveway.
(s) Distance between driveways, S, the inside distance
between 2 adjacent driveways measured along a highway rightof-way line.
·
R 247.234.

Commercial driveways, permits.

Rule 34. A permit application for a commercial driveway
shall specify the driveway system requested, including the
number and type:
two-way, one-way, divided, dual service or
directional.
The department may approve the requested system
or may require changes in it to insure safe conditions and
necessary spacing between driveways, based on anticipated
traffic volumes on the driveways and on the highway, type of
traffic to use the driveways, type of roadside development
and other operational considerations.
R 247,235.

Commercial driveways, consolidation.

Rule 35. Adjacent property owners may consolidate their
commercial driveways by using either a frontage road or a
joint driveway system.
If the department approves such a
system, a driveway permit shall be issued to all property
owners concerned and shall state that there is an agreement
that all properties shall have access to the highway via the
frontage road and the joint driveway system,

9

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-10

�Design Features

Figure l

I

t\

t

i
,.

E

E

I

~

H

l

~-::- ,:

~

----c..--

Single Twc-wcy Comm,rc;af Driveway
Uncurbed Hi~hwcy

e

Exit Drive

Entrcnce Drive

l
F

------t.--Divided Cammercicl Driveway

~9!l.!.:...£.!.·~--•-y

I

\

le It Driveway

~ - - -- ----

Right . Driveway

- ~'};~_!---------~------~-Duel Service Drivewcys

Curbed Highwcy

l--Ll

f-'Y

~\~
~~~~~~~~~~~;~

Ruidenticl Driveway
Curb-return Typ•
Curbed Hig_hwcy

Residential Drivewcy
Curb-cul Type
Curbed Kighwcy

SICETCHES J..RE NOT DRAWN TO SCALE

10

II

"II

(

E

Single Two-wcy Ccrr.rr, ercicl Drivewcy
Curbed Hi hwc

•
-II
"II
•II

t

l

t.-

l

I

9

I

e

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-11

Ruidenlicl Driveway
Paved or Greve! Surlace
Uncurbed' Highway

�•
-Iii
•II
1111

Ill

"
"•
II
II

R ·247.236.

Commercial driveways, alteration of dimensions .

Rule 36.
If the highway carries one-way traffic, the
dimensions given in rules 41 and 42 may be altered so that
the prohibited movements are discouraged.
If the driveway
system is on the left-hand side of a o~e-way highway, the
dimensions·used shall be based on the same principles as
used on right-hand side driveways.
R 247.237.

Corunercial driveways, right-turn lanes.

Rule 37. The applicant shall provide right-turn lanes or
tapers as part of a commercial driveway system if the department determines that such ·right-turn lanes or tapers are
required to minimize congestion or hazard on the highway
caused by vehicles ent~ring the applicant's driveways. A
right-turn lane shall be preceded by a taper. The design
feature di~ensions of a right-turn lane and taper shall
conform to those given in table 1.

TABLE1
COMMERCIAL RIGHT•TURN LANE AND TAPERS
Curbed Highway

Design
Features

Stondord

Curb Ending

Enfcrini

F
G
H

Toper
Exitin~

J

Toper

Stondord

Ronge

10 ft

no range

os determined by the Geporfmenl
12 ft
150 ft •

10 to 15 ft

12 ft

10 to 15 fr

50 to 150 ft

150 ft

50 to 150 ft

so

50 to 150 ft

not opplicoble

ft

• If a right•tvrn lone is used, the Entering Toper stondcrd shell be 50 ft.
Without a right-turn lone, the Entering Teper stcndcrd shell be 150 ft.

The standard shell b~ used un/eu engineering iudgmenf determines that another
&lt;Hmension within the range is more suitcofe for c porliculor site or specie/ con•
dition ond is approved by the deportment.

R 247 .241.

Two-way commercial drive~·ays.

Rule 41. The design feature dimensions of a two-way
coI!llllercial driveway shall conform to those given in table· 2.

II
II

•
-~

not opplicoble

E

Ri~t-tvm Lone
Len Qin
R i ght-tvrn Lon•
Width

Range

Uncurbcd Highway

11

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-12

�•ill

(2)
Adjace~t to and on both sides of a driveway, a
buffer area between the right-of-way line and the pavement
edge shall be used, as determined by the department, to
provide a physical barrier between highway traffic and
activity on private property.
A buffer area is needed to
provide an unobscured vision area and to prevent potentially
hazardous movement of vehicles, especially at undesirable
angles of approach, from and to the highway. The b'1ffer
area shall consist of a lawn area, a low shrub area, a ditch
or equivalent. Where encroachment of vehicle parking on the
buffer area t~kes place or may take place, the department
may require the buffer area to be established by guardrail,
guard posts, curb or equivalent.

ill

II

•
•
-II
..
•
•
•
•
•

R 247.233.

Design Features.

Rule 33. The design features described in this rule and
illustrated in figure l shall be used by the applicant in
dimepsioning a proposed driveway or driveway system on plans
accompanying the driveway permit application. The diraens ions
to be used for various driveway design features, shown as a
standard with a working range of dimensions, are given in
tables l to 7, rules 37 to 49. These standard dimensions
shall be used unless conditions warrant a deviation. The
department may specify particular dimensions so a particular
driveway system will accommodate vehicle movements normally
expected without creating undue congestion or hazard on the
highway or to provide reasonable access. The letters in the
following design features refer to features in figure 1:
(a)
Intersecting angle, A, the clockwise angle from a
highway centerline to a driveway reference line which is the
centerline or the edge of the driveway.
(b) Driveway width, B, the distance between driveway
edges of pavement or edges of the gravel surface measured at
the point where the edges of the driveway become parallel,
point· b in figure 1. If the right-of-way line is so close
to the pavement that point b falls on the applicant's property, then the width of the driveway at the right-of-way
line shall be based on the projected driveway width.
(c) Entering radius, C, the radius of a driveway edge
curve on the right side of a vehicle entering the applicant's
property.
(d) Exiting radius, D, the radius of a driveway edge
curv.e on the right side of a vehicle leaving the applicant's
property •
(e) Curb ending, E, the length of the height transition
of the driveway curb from ground level to full curb height
along an uncurbed highway.
This curb transition may be
10 feet min imwn •
(f)
Right-turn lane length, F, the length of an auxiliary
lane constructed preceding the driveway to accommodate rightturn traffic •entering the applicant's property •
8

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-13

�TABLE 2
TWO·WAY COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY

II

"'•
•
•
"
"
"II
•
•
"II

1ntctsecting

An~lc
O, i vc-oy

WiC,h
Entcrin~
R0Cius

Ex i t i ng
Rod i us

Uncurbed Highwoy

Curbed Highwoy

Design
Fecfures

Stondorcl

Rohge'

Stondord

Ronge

90°

60 to 120°

90°

60 lo 120°

B

30 ft

12 lo 50 ft

30 ft

15 to 50 ft

C

2!)

ft

5 to 50 ft

30 It

5 to 50 ft

D

l S ft

5 to 50 ft

20 ft

51050ft

A

The stondord shcll be used unless engineering judgment determines thot cncther
dimension within the ronge is more suitable for a por1icufor site or specie/ con•
dition end is opproved by the deporlment.

247.242.

R

One-way commercial driveways.

Rule 42. Tue des·ign feature dimensions of a one-way
commercial driveway shall conform to those given in table 3.

TABLE 3
ONE·WAY COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY
Curbed Highway

Design
F eotures

Stcndord

Ronge

Stondord

Ronge

s

not
opplicoble

40 to 500 ft

no,
cpplicoble

40 to 500 ft

An~le

A

90°

60 to 120°

90°

60 lo 120°

Driveway
Wic!lh

B

16 ft

16 to30 ft

16 ft

161030ft

c,
o,

20 ft

15to50ft

2!)

ft

15 to 50 ft

10 ft

5 to 15 ft

s ft

5tol5ft

Co.

10 ft

5to15ft

5 ft

51015ft

Do

Z)

15to50ft

20 ft

15 to 50 ft

Di,tcnce- Between
Driveways
l

ln1crsecting

!
&gt;-.
0

~ ~
C,

C:

&gt;-0

~'

:,

~o

0

Ent,ring
Rodi us
Exiling
Rodi us

0

Uncurbed Highwoy

Entering

Rodi us
Exi1ing

Rodi us

ft

The stondord sha/l be used unless engineering judgment determines that onother
dimension within the range is more suitable for a parliculor site or special con•
dition and is approved by the deporlment •

12

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-14,

�•
•
•
•
-..
"..
-II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II

R 247.243.

Divided cor.unercial drive,;.·ays.

Rule 43.
A divided commercial driveway shall have a
curbed island separating the entrance drive and the exit
drive. The radii forming the edges on this island_shall
be designed to accommodate the largest vehicle that will
normally use the driveway. The min iir.u.-:i area of the is land
shall be 50 square feet.
Toe design feature dimensions of
a divided commercial driveway shal~ conform to those given
in table 4 •

TABLE 4
DIVIDED COMMERCIAL DRIVEWAY
Un curbed H ighwoy

Curbed Highway

Design
F eolures
Intersecting

kngle
Orivewcy
Width
Entering

Rodi us
Exiling
Rodi us
Entrance Drive
Width

Sionclord

Ronge

StOfldord

Ronge

A.

90°

75 lo 105°

90°

75 to 105°

B

48 ft

42 to 90 ft

48 ft

42 lo 90 ft

C

25 ft

5 to 50 ft

25 ft

5 to 50 ft

D

25 ft

5 to 50 ft

20 ft

5 lo 50 ft

K

16 ft

l6to30ft

16 ft

16 to 30

r,

Exit Drive
Width

L

22 ft

16 to30 ft

22 ft

16to30ft

I I lond Width

M

10 ft

10to30ft

10 f1

10 lo 30 ft

Nose Offset

p

8 ft

ft

Utt

12 lo 17 ft

is lend Leng1h

N

35 ft

35 ft

20 lo 1.50 ft

2 to 10

20 to 150 ft

The stondord shall be vad vnfess engineering ·jvdgment de.termines that another
dimension within the range is more svitobfe for a porlicvfor site o&lt; specie/ condition ond is approved by the deportment.

R 247.244.

Dual service driveways.

Rule 44.
To facilitate vehicle movements between a highway and private property when the major vehicle movement at
a commercial establishment is approximately parallel to the
highway, such as at a service station or drive-in bank, the
department may permit dual service driveways. The design
feature dimensions of dual service driveways shall conform
to those given in tables.

13

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-15

�ill
ill

TABLES
DUAL SERVICE DRIVEWAYS

•
"_ _;
"-

l n1c,sec ti n9

,._
-

0

Angle

t

En,c ,i ng

er .;

Rccfh.,s

~
"'C&gt;

0

Exit i n9
Re di v s

,._
.:: ~
C&gt;

C&gt;

_J -~

0

ln t crse-ct i ng

S10nd0rd

Ronge

90°

60°

45 lo 90°

AR

60°

CR

15 ft

5 lo 50 ft

20 ft

5 to 50 ft

DR

10 ft

5 lo 25 ft

5 ft

5 to 25 ft

45

lo

Ang l e

AL

120°

90 to 135•

120°

90 lo 135•

CL

10 ft

5 lo 25 ft

5 ft

5 lo 25 ft

Ex i t i ng
· Rod i u s

DL

. 15 ft

Wi C, h
O i s tonce Between
O ri vcwcys

5 lo 50 ft

Z)

ft

5 lo 50 ft

8

30 ft

12 t o50ft

30 ft

151050ft

s

20 ft

10 lo 150 ft

20 ft

10 lo 150 ft

The slondord shol/ be used unless en9ineerin9 judgment determinu thot another
dimension within the ron9e is more suitob/e for a porliculor site Ol' specie/ con•
dition ond is approved by the deportment.

R 247.245.

Directional commercial driveways.

Rule 45. A directional commercial driveway is a special
case and the driveway shall be designed individually to
facilitate the desired turning movements and to discourage
prohibited movements. Radii shall be as ·approved by the
department, based on the driveway intersecting angle and on
the turning path of the largest vehicle that will normally
use the driveway.
R 247.247.

Residential driveways, number and separation.

Rule 47. The number of residential driveways permitted
shall be determined as follows:
(a)
One residential driveway shall° be permitted for each
platted lot or for unplatted residential property with less
than 100 feet of frontage •
(b)
One additional residential driveway may be permitted
for residential property for each 70 feet of frontage in
excess of the first 100 feet of frontage.
(c)
Two residential driveways may be permitted on the
same property, in lieu of the requirements . of paragraph (b),
to . serve a circle driveway if the frontage of the property is
80 feet or more.
14

II
II
II

Slondcrd

Ronge

En t er i ng
Rod i v s

Or i vcwcy

=
II
•
•II
II

Uncurbed Highway

Curbe&lt;l Highway

De sig n
Feolures

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-16

�"II
"II
II

~

(d) Residential driveways. on the sc..:::e property shall be
at least 45 feet apart, center-to-center.
R 247,248,

Residential driveway dimensions.

Rule 48. The design feature dimensions of a residential
driveway shall conform to those given i~ table 6.

TABLE G
RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY

Range

Stondcrd

Ronge

Stondord

A

90°

70 to 110°

90°

70 to 110°

Orh•ewcy
Width

B

10 ft

8 to 24 ft

12 ft

8 to 24 ft

Entering
Rcdius

C

15 ft

5 to 15 ft

15 ft

5 to 20 ft

Exiting
Rcc!ius

D

6 ft

5tol5ft

10 ft

5 to 20 ft

Curb Cut

R

26 ft

,fnters•cting
Angle

I

Un&lt;:urbed Highwoy

Curbed Highwoy

Design
Feotures

20

lo

not applicoble

40 ft

The standard shall be used unfess engineering jud9menf determines that another
dimension within the range is more suitabfe for a porlicufar site or specie( condition orid is approved by the deportment:

R 247.249.

Field entrances and utility structure driveways.

Rule 49.
(1)
One field entrance may be permitted for
each 1000 feet of frontage of cultivated land, timber land
or undeveloped land. Additional driveways may be permitted
when a single driveway will not provide adequate access due
to topographic conditions.
(2) The design feature di~ensions of a field entrance and
of a utility structure driveway shall conform to those given
in table 7.

is

GAYLORD
MS-1
,.
91527.12·

.SD-17

�•
•
•
•
-II

TABLE 7 .
FIELD ENTRANCE AND UTILITY STRUCTURE DRIVEWAY

l t"ltersec 1i n9
0

An~ 1e

•

O rive• c y

W;e ,h
En 1e rin 9

Uncu rbed Highwoy

Stondcrd

Range

Stcndcrd

Ro ng e

A

90°

7010110°

90°

70 to 110°

B

20 ft

15 to LO ft

20 ft

15 to LO ft

C

not o ppli co b le

20 ft

5 l o 40 ft

D

not oppl icoble

Z)

Rod i u s

ft

5 t o LO ft

C ur b Cu r

R

Ro &lt;! i v s

E xitin g

26 ft

20 to 50 ft

not oppl ico b le

T f. e s tandc rd shell be used ur:less engineering judg ment determines thot an other
dirr:er:s ion ..., ;th in th e ronge is mere su i table for o por1 icufar si te or spec ie/ co~d i tio n a nd is a p p ro ved by t he department.

R 247.251.

Surfacing and curbing along curbed highways.

Rule .51. If a highway is curbed, the following driveway
surfacing and curbing requirements apply:
(a) A comoercial driveway shall be paved and curbed to
either the right-of-way line or to the point of curvature
between the driveway edge and the larger radius, point bin
figure 1, as determined by the department.
(b) A residential driveway shall be paved between the
edge of the pavement and the existing or proposed sidewalk.
If there is no existing or proposed sidewalk, the surfacing
shall extend at least 10 feet from the edge of the pavement.
For a residential driveway, either curb cuts or curb returns
shall be required as determined by the department, based on
the current department standards for curb and gutter.

Ill

"
='.
-·
II ·

R 247.252.

Surfacing and curbing along uncurbed highways.

Rule 52.
If a highway· is uncurbed, the following driveway
surfacing and curbing requirements apply:
(a) A co~~ercial driveway shall be paved and curbed to
either the right-of-way line or to the point of curvature
between the driveway edge and the larger radius, point bin
figure 1, except a commercial driveway may be uncurbed where
there is a proper ditch and other adequate roadside control
or delineation, as determined by the department. The curb
·ending adjacent to the highway shall be located at least
13.5 feet from and parallel to the edge of the pavement.
(b) A low volume commercial driveway along a low volume
highway shall be paved, but the paving may be delayed as
mutually agreed upon by the applicant and the department.

II
II

•--

Curbed Highwoy

Des ign
F e-c tur es

16

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-18

�•
•
•
•
•
•II
"
"
"
"
"II

(c) A residential driveway may be ~aved or surfaced with
stabilized gravel and may be curbed or uncurbed.
R

247.253.

Surfacing and curbing of field entrances and
utility structure driveways •

Rule 53. A field entrance or a utility structure driveway may be surfaced with stabilized gravel or with sod over
a stable base and may be uncurbed, as determined by the
department.
R 247.254.

Surface materials and thickness •

Rule 54. The surface of a paved driveway, excluding
right-turn lanes, shall be concrete, bituminous or equivalent
surfacing material. The thickness of the surface and the
base to be used shall be sufficient to provide the bearing
capacity needed to carry the proposed traffic loads.
A
2 1/2 inch, 250 pounds per square yard, bituminous mix on 8
inches of compacted gravel, 8 inches of unreinforced concrete
or equivalent surfacing material which ceets current department Standard Specifications for High~ay Construction is
acceptable for normal driveway traffic loads over stable
soil.
R 247.255.·

Right-turn lanes and tapers.

Rule 55.
(1)
The pavement of a right-turn lane and
accompanying taper~ shall ma~ch the highway pavement, unless
the department permits the use of an equivalent pavement.
(2)
The cross slope of a right-turn lane and tapers shall
be:
(a) A continuation of the cross slope of the highway if
the highway is curbed.
(b) Equal to the shoulder slope if the highway is uncurbed.
R 247.256.

Shoulders.

Rule 56.
(1)
The surface of the shoulder adjacent to a
right-turn lane and tapers shall be of the same material as
the highway shoulder and conform to the current department
Standard Specifications for Highway Construction.
(2)
If the distance between 2 paved commercial driveways
serving the same property is less than 100 feet, measured
between adjacent ends of the curb endings, the applicant
shall pave the shoulder between the driveways.
R 247.259.

Driveway curb details.

Rule 59.
(1)
The driveway curb shall either match the
existing highway curb or shall conform to the current department standards for curb and gutter.

II
II
II

-II

17

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-19

�-"•
•
•
•
"

(2) The driveway curb height shall be constant if there
is no existing or proposed sidewalk or if an inclined sidewalk is permitted by the department.
(3)
The dr i ve.:ay curb height rnay be tapered to zero
height at the si~ewalk if the driveway grade meets the grade
of an existing or proposed sidewalk •
R 247.261.

i

II
!I
!

.i

Drainage.

Rule 61.
(1)
A driveway shall be constructed so that it
~oes not adversely affect the highway drainage.
The drainage
and the stability of the highway subgrade shall not be altered by driveway construction or roadside development.
(2)
Drainage fro~ adjacent parking or storage areas on
private property in excess of existing drainage shall not be
discharged into the highway drainage system.
(3) Culvert pipe shall be of a size adequate to carry
the anticipated natural flow of the ditch.
The culvert shall
be no smaller than the nearest upstream culvert nor less than
12 inches inside diameter. A culvert, catch basin, drainage
channel and other drainage structure required within the
highway right-of-way shall be manufactured or constructed
and installed in accordance with the current department
Standard Specifications for Highway Construction. The minimum length of the culvert may be determined as the sum of
the distance between driveway edges, measured along the ditch
line, plus the distances needed to accommodate an embankment
slope not to exceed 1 foot vertical for 6 feet horizontal on
both sides of the driveway.
R 247.263.

Profile.

Rule 63. A driveway profile shall be determined using
the following criteria:
(a)
If the highway is uncurbed, the grade of the driveway between the highway edge of pavement and the edge _of the
shoulder shall conform to the slope of the shoulder.
(b)
If the highway is uncurbed or if the sidewalk is
more than 10 f~et from the edge of the pavement or if there
is no sidewalk: •
(1)
The grade of a two-way, one-way or divided commercial
driveway shall not exceed 1.5% for a minimum distance of
25 feet from the edge of the pavement. Beyond this distance, the grade shall not exceed 8% .
(ii)
The grade of a residential or utility structure
driveway or field entrance shall not exceed 10%,
(c)
If the highway is curbed and if the sidewalk is 10
feet or less from the edge of pavement, the grade of a driveway, except a directional driveway, shall be the grade required to meet the sidewalk elevation; but if that grade
would exceed the maximums specified in paragraph (b), the
sidewalk shall be either tilted or inclined.

=r

"'"
II
II

"
"Ill
-

18

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-20

�(d)
The grade of a directional dri\'eway shall be designed
so to provide vision of the highway edge of pavement and the
driveway surface for a distance of 100 feet along the driveway.
For a driveway on an upgrade towards the highway, a
grade of 1.5% for a distance of 100 feet from the e~ge of
the pavement is acceptable.
Beyon~ this distance, the grade
shall not exceed 4% and the difference in grades where there
is a change of grade shall not exceed 3%.
(e) Vertical curves, with a minimur.i length of 15 feet,
shall be provided at a change cf grade of 4% or more.
(f)
If the sidewal~ elevation has to be adj~sted to meet
the driveway, the department may require that the sidewalk
be inclined at a rate not to exceed 1 foot vertical for every
24 feet horizontal.
R 247.265.

Parking and storage.

Rule 65. Adequate storage for vehicles parking or waiting to be serviced shall be provided so as not to interfere
with pedestrian movements, vision requirements or traffic
operations on the highway.
R 247. 267.

Traffic signs and markings.-

Rule 67.
A permittee shall provide and properly maintain
traffic signs and pavement markings which the department
determines necessary, subject to local ordinances, for proper
operation of the driveway. Only those traffic signs and
pavement markings approved by the department may be used
within the highway right-of-way. Signs and pavement markings
shall conform to the current Michigan Manual of Uniform
Traffic Control Devices.
·

19

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-21

�•
•
•
•
~
"

STANDARDS OF DESIGN - SANITARY SEWERS

These standards establish the minimum requirements for the design of sanitary sewers in the
Municipality.
Plans and Specifications

1.

The plans and specifications shall be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the
State of Michigan.

2.

Plans shall consist of a cover sheet showing a location map and site plan of the proposed
project, plan and profile sheets covering all the proposed street and roadway construction,
and a standard detail sheet Plan sheet size shall be 24" x 36" or 22" x 34". Plan scale
shall be either 1" = 40' or 1" = 20' horizontally and 1" = 5' vertically.

3.

Elevations shall be based upon U.S.G.S. datum. Elevations based upon assumed datum
will not be approved.

4.

Plan profiles shall indicate existing and proposed ground levels, U.S.G.S. elevations, and
stationing.

5.

Four sets of plans and specifications shall be submitted by the Developer to the
Municipality for preliminary approval. All plans and specifications submitted for
approval shall be sealed by the registered engineer in charge of design. Modifications
required to meet the municipal standards, if any, will be noted on two sets, with one such
set returned to the Developer for final corrections within 90 days of receipt.

6.

Six sets of final plans and specifications shall be submitted by the Developer to the
Municipality for approval. All plans and specifications submitted for approval shall be
sealed by the registered engineer in charge of design.

7.

The Developer will complete the Act 98 Sanitary Sewer Construction Permit from the
DNR. The City will sign the pennit and submit it to the DNR after City review and
approval. The Developer will be responsible for securing all other pennits required for
the sanitary sewer construction.

8.

One (1) set of reproducible "as-built" tracings, on mylar or polyester film, shall be
submitted to the Municipality upon completion of the utility construction. The location
of all tees, manholes, and the intersection of the service lateral and the respective property
line shall be witnessed from at least two permanent topographic features.

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-22

�•
•II
•
•II
II
II
II

-II
II

"

"
"II

Location
The location of the sanitary sewer within the street right-of-way shall be on the centerline of the
street
Minimum Grades and Velocities
Sanitary sewers shall be designed to maintain a minimum velocity of two feet per second;
maximum velocity shall not exceed ten feet per second. Suggested minimum grades for various
size sanitary sewers are listed below:
6" (lateral)

8"
10"
12" .
15"
18"
24"

1.00%
0.40%
0.30%
0.22%
0.15%
0.12%
0.10%

Minimum Diameter
The Developer shall install the appropriately sized sanitary sewer system to serve the proposed
development and shall submit · supporting documentation and calculations to the City to
demonstrate adequacy.
The minimum diameter of collected sewers shall be eight inches and the minimum diameter of
the service lateral shall be six inches. The municipality may desire to increase the size of certain
sewers for their own purposes, in which case the municipality shall pay for the difference in
sewer pipe and manhole construction material costs over and above the Developer's proposed
diameter sanitary sewer and manhole structures.
Sewer Pipe
Sanitary sewer pipe shall be PVC conforming to ASTM D3033 or ASTM D3034. Minimum wall
thickness shall be SDR-35. Joints shall be of the elastomeric gasket push-on type conforming
to ASTM D3212.
Manholes
Manholes shall be constructed at all changes in gr-ade, size and alignment of the sanitary sewer.
The maximum run between manholes shall be 400 feet All manholes shall be precast concrete
with rubber "O" ring at joints; block or brick sanitary manholes will not be approved. All pipe
· openings shall be cast in the precast section or cored in the finished wall. Manhole pipe
connections shall be furnished with an integrally cast seal system, equal to "Press Wedge II",
"Kor-N-Seal", "Lock Joint Flexible Manhole Sleeve", or equal. Sanitary manholes shall have
GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-23

�•
•II
II

•,i
Ill

•
•
•
•
•II
II

integrnl concrete manhole bottom. A drop pipe shall be constructed for all sewers entering a
manhole at a height of 24 inches or greater above the proposed manhole invert. The minimum
inside diameter of a sanitary sewer manhole for sewers through 21 inches in diameter shall be
48 inches. For sanitary sewer 24 to 36 inches in diameter, the minimum inside diameter of the
sanitary manhole shall be 60 inches. A minimum of three rows and a maximum of six rows of
concrete adjusting bricks or rings shall be constructed on top of the precast cone section. The
interior and exterior of the adjusting bricks or rings shall receive a ½ inch thick coat of plaster.
All manholes shall be provided with approved manhole steps.
Service Laterals
Connection of the service laterals to the collection sewer shall be by means of a sewer pipe wye
or tee fitting. The service lateral shall be constructed to the property line of all lots and marked
in accordance with the sanitary sewer standard of construction included herein. In addition, the
Developer shall be required to furnish to the Municipality a map indicating the precise location
of all sanitary sewer laterals at the property line intersection. The location should be witnessed
from two recoverable reference points. All service laterals shall have a minimum 4" diameter
cleanout pipe connected to the lateral with a wye fitting. The cleanout pipe shall be extended
to the surface and equipped with a threaded cap set flush with the ground surface. The cleanout
cap shall be located six inches (6") inside the right-of-way line. For service laterals of extended
length, cleanouts shall be constructed at 100 foot intervals. Where sanitary sewers are deeper
than 15 feet, 6 inch diameter risers shall be constructed such that the service lateral is 11 feet
below finish grade at the property line. All changes in direction, materials, or pipe size shall be
done with proper fittings.
Subsurface Soil Conditions
The Developer shall provide sufficient soil borings along the sanitary sewer route to accurately
describe the prevailing soil conditions. The borings shall be constructed to a depth of four feet
below the proposed invert elevation of the sanitary sewer.
Manhole Casting
Refer to the table of standard castings and valves for the municipalities standard manhole
castings.
Lift Stations
Unless otherwise approved lift stations shall be of fiberglass enclosed suction lift type station.
Each station shall be equipped with an adequately sized wet-well, duplex pumps, suction and
discharge plug valves, discharge check valves, high and low water level alarms, ventilation and
heaters. Stations shall have provisions for accepting portable emergency generator service
compatible with the City's generator. Pump stations shall be similar to the City's existing station
and shall be subject to the approval of the Municipality. Lift station design shall conform to the
guidelines contained in the Recommended Standards for Sewage Works, Great Lakes-Upper
GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-24

�II
II
II
II
II

•
•II
..

II

II

II

Mississippi River Board of State Sanitary Engineers (fen-States Standards) unless otherwise
noted or approved. All submersible pump lift stations shall be provided with intrinsically safe
electrical control systems. The electrical system shall have provisions for accepting portable
electrical generator service. Lift station design shall be subject to the approval of the
municipality.
Inverted Siphons
Generally, the use of inverted siphons will not be approved unless specific conditions warrant
their use.
Ille!!al Connections
The connections of footings drains, roof drains, sump pump discharge, or yard drains to the
sanitary sewer are strictly prohibited.
Connection Elevations
Plans submitted for approval shall note the elevation of the sanitary sewer service lead at the
building foundation line as well as the invert elevation of the service lead at the collection sewer
in the street. Minimum cover over the service lateral shall be four feet.
Trench Load.in!? Design
All sanitary sewers shall be designed so as to resist all trench backfill and construction load or
anticipated superimposed loadings utilizing a factor of safety of 2.0 of the pipe's resistance to
failure .

..

II
II
II
II
II
II
II

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.i2

SD-25

�•II
II

•
•••
..

II
II

;
"
"•
•
•
•
•

STANDARDS OF DESIGN - STORM SEWERS
Scope
These standards establish the minimum requirements for the design of storm sewers in the
Municipality.
Plans and Specifications
1.

The plans and specifications shall be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the
State of Michigan .

2.

Plans shall consist of a cover sheet showing a location map and site plan of the proposed
project, plan and profile sheets covering all the proposed street and roadway construction,
and a standard detail sheet. Plan sheet size shall be 24" x 36" or 22" x 34". Plan scale
shall be either 1" 40' or 1" 20' horizontally and 1" 5' vertically.

=

=

=

3.

Elevations shall be based upon U.S.G.S. datum. Elevations based upon assumed datum
will not be approved.

4.

Plan profiles shall indicate existing and proposed ground levels, U.S.G.S. elevations, and
stationing.

5.

Four sets of plans and specifications shall be submitted by the Developer to the
Municipality for preliminary approval. All plans and specifications submitted for
approval shall be sealed by the registered engineer in charge of design. Modifications
required to meet the municipal standards, if any, will be noted on two sets, with one such
set returned to the Developer for final corrections within 90 days of receipt.

6.

Six sets of final plans and specifications shall be submitted by the Developer to the
Municipality for approval All plans and specifications submitted for approval shall be
sealed by the registered engineer in charge of design .

7.

The Developer will be responsible for securing all State and local construction pemuts
required for storm sewer construction.

8.

One (1) set of reproducible "as-built" tracings, on mylar or polyester film, shall be
submitted to the Municipality upon completion of the utility construction. The location
of all tees, manholes and catch basins shall be witnessed from at least two permanent
topographic features .

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•II
"

Location
Location shall be within the street right-of-way 8 feet south and 8 feet east of the centerline of
the right-of-way.
Minimum and Maximum Velocity

All storm sewers shall be designed to provide a minimum velocity of three feet per second and
a maximum velocity of ten feet per second when the pipe is flowing full .
Minimum Diameter
The Developer shall install the appropriately sized storm sewer system to serve the proposed
development and shall submit supporting documentation and calculations to the City to
demonstrate adequacy .
The minimum diameter for all storm sewer, including catch basin leads, shall be 12 inches. The
Municipality may desire to increase the size of certain sewers for their own purposes, in which
case the Municipality shall pay for the diffe/ence in sewer pipe and manhole structure material
costs over and above the Developer's proposed diameter storm sewer and manhole structures.
Manhole
Storm sewer manholes shall be constructed at all changes in grade, size and alignment of the
storm sewer. The maximum run between storm sewer manholes shall be 500 feet Manholes
may be either precast concrete or concrete block construction. The minimum inside manhole
diameter for storm sewers through 21 inches in diameter shall be 48 inches. For storm sewers
from 24 to 36 inches in diameter, the minimum storm manhole diameter shall be 60 inches. For
storm sewers 42 inches and larger, "tee" manhole riser sections shall be used. Should a change
in grade, size or alignment of the pipe occur in a manhole where one or more of the sewers are
42 inches in diameter or large, the manhole section shall have a minimum inside diameter of the
largest pipe diameter plus two feet All manholes shall be provided with approved manhole
steps.
Storm Sewer Design
Storm sewer design shall be consistent with engineering practice and shall utilize a minimum
storm flow generated from a 10 "year, 24 hour storm event
Catch Basins
Storm sewer catch basins shall have a minimum inside diameter of 48 inches and shall provide
a minimum sump depth of 24 inches below the lowest pipe invert elevation. Catch basins shall
be constructed at all low poin~ in the curb and gutter and shall be located so as to limit storm
water travel in the gutter section to a maximum distance of 250 feet

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-27

�Standard Castine:s
Refer to the Table of Standard Castings and Valves for the municipalities standard castings.
Trench Loadin e: Desi e:n
All storm sewers shall be designed so as to resist all trench backfill and construction load or
anticipated superimposed loadings utilizing a factor of safety of 2.0 of the pipe's resistance to
failure.
Pipe Materials
Storm sewers shall be constructed with reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) or high depsity
polyethylene corrugated pipe with an integrally formed smooth interior. Corrugated metal pipe
(CMP) may be approved for service leads off the public R.O.W. and culverts.

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-28

�•
•
•
•
•
"
"

STA1\1DARDS OF DESIGN - "\VA TER DISTRIBUTION SYSTEMS
Scope
These standards establish the minimum requirements for the design of storm sewers in the
Municipality.
Plans and Specifications
1.

The plans and specifications shall be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the
State of Michigan.

2.

Plans shall consist of a cover sheet showing a location map and site plan of the proposed
project, plan and profile sheets covering all the proposed street and roadway construction,
and a standard detail sheet Plan sheet size shall be 24" x 36" or 22" x 34". Plan scale
shall be either 1" = 40' or 1" =· 20' horizontally and 1" = 5' vertically.

3.

Elevations shall be based upon U.S.G.S. datum. Elevations based upon assumed datum
will not be approved.

4.

Plan profiles shall indicate existing and proposed ground levels, U.S.G.S. elevations, and
stationing.

5.

Four sets of plans and specifications shall be submitted by the Developer to the
Municipality for preliminary approval. All plans and specifications submitted for
approval shall be sealed by the registered engineer in charge of design. Modifications
required to meet the municipal standards, if any, will be noted on two sets, with one such
set returned to the Developer for final corrections within 90 days of receipt

6.

Six sets of final plans and specifications shall be submitted by the Developer to the
Municipality for approval All plans and specifications submitted for approval shall be
sealed by the registered engineer in charge of design.

7.

The Municipality will apply for the water main construction permit from the Michigan
Department of Public Health. The Developer \\ill be responsible for securing all oL~er
permits required. for the. water distribution system construction.

8.

One (1) set of reproducJble "as-built" tracings, on mylar or polyester film, shall be
submitted to the Municipality upon completion of the utility construction. The location
of all valves and curb shutoffs shall be witnessed from at least two permanent topographic
features.

.

II
II
II

II

.

II

Ill
Ill

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-29

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•Ill
•
•II
Ill
II

II
II

Location
Location of the water main within the street right-of-way shall be 23 feet north and 23 feet west
of the centerline of the right-of-way. In no case shall a water main be constructed within ten feet
(measured horizontally) from a sanitary sewer.
Minimum Size
The Developer shall install the appropriately sized water main to serve the proposed development
and shall submit supporting documentation and calculations to the City to demonstrate adequacy.
The minimum size of water main shall be six inches in diameter. The municipality may desire
to increase the size of certain mains for their own purposes, in which case the municipality shall
pay for the difference in water main and valve material costs over and above the Developer's
proposed diameter water main and valves.
Valves

AWW A approved gate valves shall be placed throughout the distribution system in accordance
with the following regulations:

a.

On straight runs, valves shall be spaced at maximum intervals of 800 feet

b.

At tees, a minimum of two valves are required.

c.

At crosses, a minimum of three valves are required.

d.

At the end of dead end mains, valves shall be construct to facilitate future
connections.

e.

A valve shall be installed at the intersection of water mains and easement lines.
The municipality intends to maintain water main within legal easements .

Valve Boxes and Manholes
Valves shall be placed in valve manholes as directed by the municipality. Generally valve
manholes will be required in State Highway right-of-ways, paved surfaces, berms, sidewalks, and
any other location where re-excavation may be difficult Valves not placed in valve manholes
shall be provided with adjustable screw type valve boxes.
Valve Extension Stems
Where valves are used with valve boxes, the depth to the top of the valve operating nut shall not
be greater than 5½ feet \Vhere the water main is buried at a depth where the nonnal valve
operating nut will be at a depth greater than 5½ feet, a valve extension stem with operating nut
GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-30

�•
•
•
•
•II
•II
""•
•
•II
•
•
•

shall be provided and mechanically attached to the valve to provide an operating nut at the 5½
foot depth .
\Vater Mains
Water mains shall be constructed of ductile iron or PVC with a minimum cover of 6 feet The
use of cement-asbestos water main \\ill not be approved. In general, water mains shall be
designed in a network with sufficient looping to eliminate "dead end" runs. Any other pipe
material shall be subject to the approval of the municipality.
Hydrants
The minimum size for fire hydrants shall be 5 inch diameter and the hydrant shall have
connections and special construction as noted on the Table of Standard Castings and Valves .
Hydrants shall be spaced along the water main network such that all residential and commercial
establishments are within 400 feet of a hydrant (measured along the street right-of-way).
Threads on the connections shall be National Standard Threads (NS1). The hydrants shall have
plugged drains. The pumper connection shall face the street Hydrants shall be constructed at
all dead end mains. Hydrants shall be constructed from the main by use of a standard tee and
. gate valve. A concrete thrust block of sufficient area shall be constructed to resist _the thrust.
Service Connections

I

Connection to the existing main shall be made with a corporation stop with a minimum diameter
of one (1) inch. Service lead shall be type K annealed seamless copper water tubing with flared
type fittings. Service lead shall be constructed to within six inches of the property line and shall
be terminated with a curb valve. The open end shall be capped and protected during backfill
operations. An adjustable curb box shall be provided for each curb box. The size of water
service connection shall be approved by the Engineer. Each service connection shall be provided
with a minimum of 6 feet of cover. Refer to the Table of Standard Castings and Valves for
acceptable makes and model numbers .
Water Meters
Water meters together with the necessary setting equipment are to be furnished by the City upon
payment of the necessary fee as establishe4 by the City. (This fee is subject to change by the
City Council). The meter and appurtenances shall remain the property of the City and shall be
maintained by the City in accordance with the City Water Ordinance.

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-31

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-II
•
•II
II
II
II
II

STANDARDS OF DESIGN - SITE GRADING
Scope
These standards establish the minimum requirements for the design of storm sewers in the
Municipality.
Plans and Specifications
1.

The plans and specifications shall be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the
State of Michigan.

2.

Plans shall consist of a cover sheet showing a location map and site plan of the proposed
project, plan and profile sheets covering all the proposed street and roadway construction,
and a standard detail sheet Plan sheet size shall be 24" x 36" or 22" x 34". Plan scale
shall be either 1" = 40' ·or l" = 20' horizontally and l" = 5' vertically.

3.

Elevations shall be based upon U.S.G.S. datum. Elevations based upon assumed datum
will not be approved.

4.

The site plan for street and lot layout shall indicate both existing and proposed contours
at a two foot contour interval Individual lot drainage patterns shall be indicated on the
plan.

5.

Tirree sets of plans and specifications shall be submitted by the Developer to the
Municipality for preliminary approval. All plans and specifications submitted for
approval shall be sealed by the registered engineer in charge of design. Modifications
required to meet the municipal standards, if any, will be noted on two sets, with one such
set returned to the Developer for final corrections.

6.

Six sets of final plans and specifications shall be submitted by the Developer to the
Municipality for approval All plans and specifications submitted for approval shall be
sealed by the registered engineer in charge of design.

7.

The Developer will be responsible for securing all State and local construction permits.

Grading
Site grading shall be designed to allow for drainage of storm water away from residential or
commercial buildings. Grades shall be such as to minimize earth settlement problems, avoid
concentrating run-off onto adjacent properties, prevent creation of water pockets or pools of
standing water and to minimize erosion. The grading design shall incorporate natural drainage
courses where possible. In areas where natural drainage is not present, sutface (ditches) or

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-32

�•
•
•
•
•
•II
•II
•II
•
•
•
•
•
•

subsurface (storm sewers) drainage shall be provided for collection and disposal of storm run-off.
It is the intent of these regulations that the grading design minimize the need for banks, retaining
walls or terracing. Minimum grade away from structures shall be two percent On slopes of 3.5
horizontal to 1 vertical or greater, Class A sodding with pegs must be provided to minimize
erosion. The maximum aalowable slope shall be 3.5 horizontal to 1 vertical. Site grading shall
conform to the applicable sections of the Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Act Where
mulch is required, a mulch adhesive shall be used.

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-33

�CITY OF GAYLORD
TABLE OF STANDARD CASTINGS AND VALVES

SEWER SYSTEM
SANITARY MANHOLE CASTINGS

EJIW lOCX) A

STORM MANHOLE CASTINGS

EJIW lOCX) B

CATCH BASIN CASTINGS
CURB TYPE (C-4)
CURB TYPE (ROLLBACK)
DITCH TYPE (BEElllVE)
INVERTED CROWN, ROAD EOOE
PARKING LOTS (CONCAVE INLET)

EJIW 7045 Ml
EJIW 7065 Ml
EJIW 1OCX) TYPE 02 GRATE
EJIW 5105 M2

WATER DISTRIBUITON SYSTEM
FIRE HYDRANTS

EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS
MODEL 5BR WITH 2-2½ HOSE
CONNECTIONS AND 1 STANDARD
PUMPER CONNECTION. NATIONAL
STMTDARD THREADS.

GATE VALVES

RESILIENT WEDGE TYPE
WATERO US SERIES 500, KENNEDY
KEN-SEAL.

CORPORATION STOPS

:MUELLER H-15008 OR APPROVED
EQUAL.

CURB STOP

MUELLER ORJSEAL MARK III OR
APPROVED EQUAL.

CURB STOP BOX

MUELLER OR APPROVED EQUAL
WITH ARCH PATTERN BASE,
STATIONARY ROD AND LID WITH
PENTAGONAL BRASS PLUG.

SERVICE LEAD

TYPE K MTJ\TEALED SEA.111.ESS
COPPER

VALVE MANHOLE CASTINGS

EJIW lOCX) A

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SD-34

�STAI\TDARDS OF CONSTRUCTION - UTILITY CONSTRUCTION
\VITHIN MUNICIPAL STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY
General
This specification covers the requirements of all gas, telephone, cable television or other public
utilities, and private pers@ns or corporations in conjunction with construction operations within
Municipal Street rights-of-way.
All new utility installations including electrical service, telephone and cable t v. shall be installed
underground.
All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner and interference with flow of
traffic shall be kept to a minimum. No street may be closed without prior permission from the
authority having jurisdiction. The utility shall be responsible for providing, installing, and
maintaining traffic control signs, lights and barricades as required by the MDOT Manual of
Uniform Traffic Control Devices.
Whenever reference is made to specifications other than those contained herein, said
specifications shall apply and be binding as if fully repeated herein. Unless otherwise specified,
all work shall conform with applicable divisions of the "Standard Specifications for Highway
Construction", latest revision of the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT).
The utility company, private person or corporation shall notify the Municipality 72 hours prior
to commencing construction operations, unless the situation warrants immediate action.
Where applicable, construction plans shall be submitted to the City for approval 30 days in
advance of the proposed initiation of construction operations.
Construction Operations

In general, construction operations shall be in accordance with the applicable sections of the
MUNICIPAL STANDARDS.
1.

Pavement Crossings - Unless otherwise specified, where a utility line crosses the entire
width of a permanent pavement, the utility, private persons or corporations will be
required to bore, bore and jack, or tunnel in accordance with Section 02222, Excavation
for Utility Systems. If open cutting of a permanent pavement is allowed, the pavement
shall be saw cut prior tp excavation and backfilled and compacted in accordance with
Section 01410, Soils Compaction and Testing. ·

2.

Pavement Replacement - Where weather conditions allow, pavement shall be replaced
upon completion of construction operations. Pavement replacement materials shall be of
the same material as the existing pavement During freezing weather, cold patch shall be
used until permanent pavement can be replaced. The utility, private persons or
corporations shall be responsible for maintaining the cold patch until the permanent
pavement can be replaced.

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

UC-1

�BIBLIOGRAPHY

1990 STAND ARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONS1RUCI1ON, State of Michigan,
Department of Transportation.

RECO1111ENDED STAl\1DARDS FOR SE\VAGE WORKS, Great Lakes-Upper Mississippi
River Board of State Sanitary Engineers, 1978 Edition.

RECO:MMENDED STAND ARDS FOR WATER WORKS, Great Lakes-Upper Mississippi River
Board of State Sanitary Engineers, 1976 Edition.

ADMIN1STRATIVE RULES REGULA TING DRIVEWAYS. BANNERS. AND PARADES ON
Al\1D OVER HIGITTVA YS, State of :Michigan, Department of Transportation.

•
•
'

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

B-1

�•
•
•
•
•
•II
II
II
II
II
II

SECTION 01410
SOILS COMPACTION AJ\TJ) TESTING

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment and materials in connection with
SOILS COMPACTION A!\TD TESTING.

1.02

RELATED ·woRK: The Contractor shall compact all bedding, backfill, fills,
and embankments to the percentage of maximum unit weight specified herein. All
compaction operations shall be performed utilizing suitable methods and
equipment specifically designed for earth compaction. Rollers shall be of a
standard design and in general shall be vibratory, rubber tire or smooth steel drum
for granular materials and kneading type (sheep's foot) for non-granular materials.
All operations shall be performed such that they do not damage or displace any
pipes, utilities or structures. Compaction by flooding or jetting shall not be
allowed. Attention is directed to SECITON 01560 - SPECIAL CONTROLS.

1.03

DEFThTfIONS

•
•
•
•
•II
II

•

PART 1

002

A.

GRANULAR MATERIALS: Soils having a loss by washing of 15 percent or
less.

B.

NON-GRANULAR MATERlALS: Soils having a loss by washing of more than
15 percent

C.

LOSS BY WASHING: Materials finer than a No. 200 sieve as determined by
ASTMC117 .

D.

MAXIMUM UNIT WEIGHT: Maximum dry pounds per cubic foot at the
optimum moisture content as determined by the following standard tests:

1.

Modified Proctor: AASHTO 180, Method C, shall be used for granular
and non-granular materials at structures as noted in Part D of the appended
table .

2.

Standard Proctor: AASHTO T-99 as modified by MDOT shall be used for
soils having a loss by wash greater than 15%.

3.

Michigan Cone: The MDOT "Method of Test for the Compaction and
Density of Soils (Granular)" shall be used for granular materials .

E.

OPTTh1UM MOISTURE CONTENT: Shall be the percent moisture of the soil at
which the maximum unit weight is obtained by the above tests.

F.

LIFT: Shall be the vertical measure of a soil layer when measured loose.
01410-1

�II
II

•
•
•II

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

:MATERIALS: Shall be as specified herein, and as noted on the plans. The
Contractor shall notify the Engineer of the source of materials at least three days
prior to their use to allow for testing of samples .

PART 3

EXECUTION

3.01

COMPACTION AND TESTmG

A.

II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II

•
•
•
•
•

MOISTURE CONTENT: All material shall be at or near the optimum moisture
content when compacted. Unless modified by the Engineer, the allowable
moisture range shall be as follows:
1.
2.

Granular soils: -3% to +2% above the optimum
Non-granular soils: -1 % to +3% above the optimum

In the event the moisture content of the material exceed these limits, the material
shall be allowed to dry or dried by discing of harrowing. In the event that the
moisture content is too low to obtain the required densities when compacted, water
shall be added to increase the moisture content to the optimum.

002

B.

TESTING: Moisture and in-place density tests will be made on the compacted
fill in locations and at times as selected by the Engineer. The costs of tests which
meet the specifications will be paid by the Owner. The costs of failing tests will
be paid by the Contractor and said costs will be deducted from sums due the
Contractor. The Contractor may elect to perform additional testing at his own
expense for his own purposes, however, the Engineer's decision of the suitability
of materials and compliance with specifications shall be final.

C.

TABLE OF C011PACTION OPERATIONS Al\TD REQUIREMENTS: The
appended table lists requirements for minimum in-place densities and maximum
lifts for various compaction operations, material classifications, and locations. The
lift thickness, moisture content, type of equipment, number of passes, and weight
and speed of equipment shall be adjusted to product the required compaction
density with consistent results .

D.

SUBSIDENCE AND SETTLEMENT: The Contractor shall be responsible to
conduct all compaction operations in such a manner to avoid objectionable soil
settlement Irrespective of compaction tests results, excessive ·soil settlement any
resulting structure or pavement damage shall be repaired by the Contractor.

01410-2

�•
•II
•
•
•II

TABLE OF COMPACTION OPERATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS

•
Compaction
Operation

A.

II

B.

002

Min. In-Place
Density% Max.
Unit Weight

Granular
Crushed Stone

6"
12"

95%
N.A.

Granular

4"

(2)

95%

BACKFILL FOR UTILilY SYSTEMS:
1.

Undercut below
plan grade
to 4" below
pipe

2.

Bedding (from
4" below pipe
to l' above pipe)

3.

Backfill over
bedding-open
field

Trench Mat'l

12"

(6)

90%

4.

Backfill under
permanent
pavements

Granular

12"

(6)

95%

5.

Backfill under
existing
utilities

Granular

6''

(6)

95%

6.

Backfill around
manholes and
other structures

Granular

12"

(6)

95%

Ill

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•II

Max. Lift
Loose
Measure

Material
Classification (1)

EMBANKMENTS:
1.

General

2.

Under utility
structures

(3)
Granular

01410-3

9"-12" (4)(6)
12''

(6)

95%
97%

�II

•
•
•II

C.

D.

II
II
II
II

Existing Mat'l

9"-18" (5)

1.

Subgrade

2.

Aggregate Base
Course

As Specified

3"-6"

98%

3.

Aggregate
Surface Course

As Specified

3"-6"

98%

95%

STRUCTURES:
1.

Adjacent to
walls

Granular

12"

2.

Under floor and
foundation slabs
and footings
(Structural Fill)

Granular

9"

(6)

95%

97%

NOTES:

•
•
•II

(1) Specific material requirements shall be as specified herein or shown on the
drawings.
(2) For pipes of 8 inch O.D. and less, maximum lift shall be one-half of the pipe
O.D.
(3) Material as designated on the drawings or as approved by the Engineer, with
exception that frost heave material, as defined in MDOT Specification
2.08.lOd may not be used in top 3 feet of embankment below subgrade.
(4) 9" for non-granular, 12" for granular materials.

II

•
•
•II
•

STREETS AND ROADWAYS:

(5) Depth of lift indicated is below excavation at which compaction is required
provided a base course is required. If a base course is not required,
compacted depth shall be 18 ".
(6) The maximum depth of lift for hydraulic compactors which may be allowed
by the Engineer v.ill vary depending upon the compaction equipment utilized
by the Contractor. The maximum depth of lift shall not exceed 50%
(percent) of the maximum compaction lift stated in the compaction equipment
manufacturers data sheet, provided the Contractor can demonstrate that the
required density has been achieved throughout the depth of the lift.

E:t-.TO OF SECTION

002

01410-4

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
'
'•
•

SECTION 01560
SPECL\L CONTROLS

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

'WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
pertains to SPECIAL CONTROLS.

1.02

SPECIFICATIONS BY REFERENCE: Where reference is made in the
specifications to standards of any technical society, association, governmental
agency, etc., said specifications or standards shall apply and be binding as though
fully repeated therein and are to be considered as a part of these specifications .

1.03

RELATED WORK: The Contractor shall conduct his work in a manner to
prevent air, water, and noise pollution by establishing adequate controls during the
construction operations. All controls shall be in accordance v.'i.th the applicable
laws of the State of Michigan.

A.

AIR POLLUTION: The open burning of combustible wastes from clearing and
grubbing operations and of waste construction materials will not be permitted.
The Contractor shall dispose of all such wastes at sanitary landfill(s) licensed by
the Michigan Department of Natural Resources .

1.

001

Dust Control: The Contractor shall maintain all traveled areas in a safe,
dust-free conditions at all times. To accomplish this, the Contractor shall
remove any tracked materials such as much, dirt, etc. from construction
and haul roads, furnish and apply chloride treatment to temporary roads,
furnish and install temporary road patches or surface, or any other
approved methods or systems .

B.

WATER POLLUTION: The Contractor will be required to perform all
construction operations in a manner that will conform to the requirements of Act
347, Soil Erosion and Sedimentation Control Act Methods to be used are
indicated herein (Items No. 1 through 46) and referenced with numbers and
symbols to the plans when special details are designated. The Contractor shall
also be required to perform all work in conformance with the requirements of Act
346, Inland Lakes and Streams. The permits for construction will be obtained by
the Owner.

C.

NOISE POLLUTION: The Contractor shall exercise judgment in the conduct of
operations which by nature result in excessive noise. All such operations shall
take place during reasonable daylight periods, which are defined at 7:00 a.m.
through 6:00 p.m. unless otherwise stated in the governing municipal ordinance,
or authorized by the Owner.

01560-1

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-Ill
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I

D.

CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS: All construction debris shall be removed from the
construction site(s) at regular intervals and disposed of at sanitary landfill(s)
licensed by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.

E.

HOUSEKEEPING: The project worlc areas shall be maintained in a neat and
clean conditions and all debris and waste materials shall be removed from work
areas on a daily basis .

1.04

VEHICULAR ~'\'D PEDESTRIAN TRAFFIC CONTROL: The Contractor
shall be responsible for providing, installing, and maintaining vehicular and
pedestrian traffic control signs, lights, and barricades in conjunction with
construction operations. Vehicular traffic control measures shall be in accordance
with the Michigan Manual of Uniform Traffic Control Devices.

A.

STREET CLOSING: No street or roadway may be closed to traffic without prior
written pennission of the governing body having jurisdiction over the street or
roadway.

B.

EXISTING TRAFFIC CONTROL SIGNS: Existing traffic control signs which
conflict with construction operations may be temporarily removed. The Contractor
shall provide traffic control for the duration of the sign displacement and signs
shall be replaced in the proper location immediately after construction operations
adjacent to the sign locations are completed.

END OF SECTION

II

•

001

01560-2

�•
•

111·01

:::

::
::

.. - --- .
-- - -- -.

=

::

-

--- --

::

:.

---

- - -- -... -:::=~===
- -- 0

~B

-- -.... -.. --

0

-

-

;

-

;Hi!

-

- -

=--

i

-

'

=
::

....

; :: =::
....;~:~
-- .

-- -

1 Ii ;===

:

r
-:
;

g

:

=

----

-- =
;

&lt;t

w

&lt;t

~

u

::;

....~
'i:

~

~

~)

I

-

-

I

I

(

=

a::

- --- .. -- -- --- .....- -.--~

&gt;l-

(J)

w

-. -- -;~;

--

~

:::

-

0

a::
Q_

m- -=

:::&gt;

I

(J)

-

-

w
Q_

- -

~
a::

-

-

a::

:

=

-

J

-c

01560-3

. ------ -~=~
-------~~E
-. --. ----

:;

-

;..

=

- - --

-.

=
;

-- -- .....

~§~~i

I~
:: J

~

-

-

- !
}

~

lS

:
.:

-

::

I

�,.
..
..
;
l
•-------- - 0

STREAMS

ENCLOSED DRAINAGE SYSTEMS

(USlltCIIU t11t

2B

11
,,.......,..

.. -...- .-

~"""

~

111111111

29

i:.~--~==:::.i..,.,, ...•

llf"nT. ,.;;_

llllll &amp;I 11\.tl

JO

~-

----·-

H
CU II CIIIIIVII MIii IOII 1'1111,1111 111111 tOUIIIIJI
tllll 111(1 tu II PV"II llllClll IICI 1111 11111 ■
II Ulllill 111111111 II IIIIJ ■

::::: . ~ ~ ) " '

·--::. ~~ -~

◄J

....

11i,ou11 111111
c111111 c,m1

)2

UllhS

))

'·

auu,

llllltll IUI II lllll

v ·--~fo:~
~
- - .,~❖i
~---=--

lllllll IIIIUPIIOI '"U III0lll

Ull(\ 11\IU

-

OSI ID \lllf(

1111 ltlll 111 II (litN 1111' . 1101

'11(.

IU0lll IU[ lit

·BORROW AREAS

Pll/1111 UIUII IU,I ,11111 HOU 1111 IIOI IUIIIUtliU

4◄

·~

!Hall 1111 llll Clllll II 11111 1111 II IIOtlPIII UI PIICI
tu II IUI 11111 II IICllllll I 11 •lllll

tU(U Ill tlOll(IIOl
1110( DI 1111H IU1

IVllOUC llotl lllO IIDlliOIIH II lllll.

:' :.. ';_~---- ..

._•• 1-!..

ll

··---·- - - - -

((OIOIIUl

INIII lllll '11111

-,-

ADV A/HAG( S

IREAll(NI l'RACIIC(

IOU

I

I

O(IAIL

'UIIII IOU It (UIIIUI( lll'lllt IOIU\ 111(.U IIICU

tUlltllU llOOtlJlt CU ll l(tOllll\JIU IUIU rUIODI Of IUClltlll

1111 II II llllllllNIII Im ltlUI" llll
llllll/11 lll,IIOl

lllltllll u11m Ill IWIII

1111'11•1 UI 11111[11[
II IUltll

llltl (II II IIIICIII ID 11'111/1 0lf . 1111 llllli
lllllll 111111 111111 IUIC, II II tUI 1110 1111

11011111

ltlltl 1111 1[0

CO.UlUIDUl to111,1t1I to II VIO ft IIO(Ullt ut l'lllt lttlOl\

11111 , lllll
111,oau, (Vl JIIIS , ..
IOl HUI

0

)(

V1

-

0--

0

~·-

IOtl CIIIIII'

I

.t:-

r

'7

l~

----·-.."I=~:n

IUIICll&amp;lltl IUII 11111 •(II

J6

~~~~.,._,011111

JI

l1111J 101 111C11U

lllltUIO 111111 IU.IUllJltl 1111 IUlllllt
,u,un nOUUVCIU ,uuu , .. 11111 ••• 111111 11111 llfl
t&amp;r,tlll IOI IOllll Hit (U II tl0111ll 110 llDal Ul(I 1ll11i, Dill
1,1 1111111

11 11\l'lt 111111

Ill 0111(1 IU(ll(U

IOUUI IUr1
111IIU, UI tU\(11

NOTES ,

Ill II IOCI II Clf II IUllll

111111111 llllll IUIIIOIII

THIS SHEET PROVIDES THE KEY TO THE NUMOEREO ER0$10N CONTROi. ITEMS
'.iHOWN ON THE CONSTRUCTION Pl.ANS, SOME ITEMS SHONN ARE PAY ITEMS, AS NOTED
IN THE SPECIFICATIONS. OTHERS ARE F1EOUIR£0 CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES ANO
MAY NOT N(C(SSARII.Y DE SEPARATE ~y ITEMS.

ll(Ullllf(

Ill lilt llltl H IIICII CM([a DI 1ftlt(II 111,
(Olllll UlllllllflOI ti UHi llltUI
,uuatal OI ., .. (USU lllllll IUllllllf

CO...l.ECTEO SILT ANO SEDIMENT SHALL DE REMOVED PERIOOICAl.LY TO MAINTAIN
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF THE SILT TRAP OR SEDIMENTATION DASIN.

IICIIUI 1111

)~
, , .. . .. ,
- - --··---- ·---

(6

I III IO 1111 Ill II 11111
Ill II COIIIIUCIII OI lUIHI . l°'I

TEMPORARY EROSION AND POLLUTION CONTROL PROVISIONS SHAU BE COOROINATt:D
Wffii THE PERMANENT CONTROL FEATURES TO ASSURE EFFECTIVE CONTRCI. Of WATER
POLLUTION DURING CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROJECT

1uuc11111.-1 UIIIS

)3

~-..'.:...:__: ~::...Z

)9

IUIIUI Ult

40

...

IN PLANNING SILT TRAPS ANO SEDIMENTATION OASINS, THE WATERWAY AREA MUST
DE INCREAS(O SO AS TO EFFECTIVELY REDUCE THE STREAM VE\.OCITY.

tu

I( ' " II IN( llf II OX( JU( Of OUUfl
110 rOtLS UI tllt (1UUU 1111 lfftCllll IUl SIIU( rUl

AGGREGATES PLACED IN STREAMS SHOULD CONTAIN A MINIMI.M CF FINES AS A
GENERAL RUl.E FOF1 DAMS IN SMALL STREAMS, AT LEAST 50•1• CF STONE SHOULD BE
(,' DIAMETER OR LARGER.

111 1l •

II COUIIUCIII OI !HIN.
111 ll. !1111 1111

Ul

IOU .

ALL TEMPO'lARY EROSION CONTROi. FACll.lTIES SHALL 8( R(MOVEO AT THE COMPl.ETION OF CONSTRUCTION UNl.ESS ORDERED BY THE ENGINEER TO BE l.EF T IN
PLACE. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN OVRING REMOVAi. TO. MINIMIZE SILTATION IN NEARBY
DrlAINAG( COJflSES

IVOI . lit .

llUIII( llUII l•UHIU

II

~~,~~ -

(IH(tll fUIIIUi t(UII llOI tUIIIIICIIOI
Iii I( f(l[l flUI(

:

�II
II

SECTION 02110
SITE PREPARATION

I

ii

-II

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment and materials in connection with
SITE PREPARATION.

1.02

RELATED WORK

II

-11

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference with flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum.

B.

RELATED SECITONS: Including, but not limited to:
1.
2.

3.

SECTION 01410 SECTION 01560 SECTION 02223 -

SOILS COMPACTION MTD TESTING
SPECIAL CONTROLS
BEDDING Al\TD BACKFILLING FOR UTILTIY
SYSTEMS
.

PART2

PRODUCTS - This section not used.

PART 3

EXECUTION

3.01

CLEARING: Shall consist of cutting, removing from the ground, and clisposing
of trees, stumps, brush, shrubs, and other vegetation occurring within the project
site which interfere with excavation, embankment or clear vision, or are otherwise
noted on the construction drawings to be removed and includes the preservation
from injury or defacement of all vegetation and objects designated to remain. Any
trees or shrubs that are designated to be saved but are damaged by the
Contractor's operations shall be repaired or replaced by the Contractor, as clirected
by the Engineer, at not adclitional cost to the Owner.

3.02

TREE Al\1D STUMP REMOVAL: Shall consist of removing trees or stumps
where called for on the plans or directed by the Engineer, or of removing stumps
which are shown on the plans as trees occurring within the project site and shall
include cutting such trees, removing their stumps and roots from the ground or
chipping the stumps and properly disposing of the material. Where removal of a
stump may result in damage to existing utilities, the stump shall be removed by
chipping to a depth of at least one foot below the finished ground surface. Other
stumps may be removed by chipping when approved by the Engineer. The
Contractor shall comply with requirements of the 1'1ichigan Act 72 of the Public

I

'-I
-

A.

001

02110-1

�I
I
I
I
I
I
II
I
I
I

-II
-

Acts of 1945 and requirements of the Michigan Act 72 and regulations of the
Michigan Department of Agriculture in regard to Dutch Elm diseased trees.

REMOVING MISCELLAA'EOUS STRUCTURES: Shall consist of removing
pavement surface and base course, curb and gutter, sidewalk, manholes and catch
basins, salvaging or disposing of the resulting materials, and backfilling the
resulting excavations.

3.03

A.

PA VE:MENT, CURB M1D GUTTER, SIDEWALK REMOVAL: Shall be to
existing joints or a sawed joint The sawed joint shall be cut with a concrete saw
to a depth sufficient to cut the steel or, if the concrete is unreinforced., at least 3
inches. If the concrete has been covered with bituminous material, the depth of
cut shall be sufficient to cut the steel or penetrate at least 3 inches into
unreinforced concrete. The use of a crane and ball type pavement breaker will not
be permitted within 50 feet of the pavement or other concrete structure that is to
remain in place. Sufficient removal shall be made to provide for proper grades
and connections in the new work.

B.

MANHOLE, CATCH BASIN AND INLET REMOVAL: In removing manholes,
catch basins and inlets, any live sewer connected to them shall be rebuilt and
properly rec~nnected through the removal areas, and service shall be maintained,
as directed by the Engineer, during such construction operations. Unless
otherwise noted, removal of the structures shall include the cost of removing the
connecting pipes or sewers. Where the existing sewer or pipes are to be
abandoned in place, the existing sewer or pipe shall be bulkheaded at the trench
or structure wall . .The cost of the bulkhead(s) shall be included in the cost of the
structure removal or abandonment

3.04

ADJUSTING UTILITY CASTINGS AA1D COVERS: Shall include all
manholes, catch basins, valve vaults, valve boxes, etc., publicly or privately
owned, which are located in the project site. All work shall be done in
accordance with the structure Owner's requirements.

A.

;

MM1HOLE OR CATCH BASIN CASTING: Adjusting the casting shall apply
where the elevation of the casting is lowered by the height of the available
adjusting brick or rings or raised to a maximum of 15 inches of brick and block
adjustment This adjustment .shall be done by one of the following methods:

1.

Masonry Adjustment: Existing castings shall be adjusted to the proper
elevation by removing the castings, and setting them to the required
elevation by supporting them on a concrete collar or on masonry, so
constructed as to hold them finnly in place. The adjacent pavement, curb,
or curb and gutter shall be replaced to the original elevation, conditions
and kind of construction, unless otherwise provided.

001

02110-2

�II
II
I
I

2.

--

II
II
II
II
II

-II
'

B.

WATER VALVE BOXES: Shall be adjusted by chipping sufficient adjacent
pavement or other material, adjusting the casting, and replacing pavement or other
material. \Vater valve boxes which cannot be adjusted properly shall be replaced
with a new screw type adjustable valve box to be furnished by the Owner and
installed by the ~ontractor.

C.

MONUMENT BOXES: Shill be adjusted to the proper elevation by placing an
approved cast iron ring to support the · cover at the correct elevation, or by
removing or chipping sufficient adjacent pavement or other material to remove the
casting, raising it to the proper elevation, and supporting it on Class B concrete.

3.05

REMOVE Al\1D REPLACE 1'-fAATJIOLE OR CATCH BASIN CASTINGS:
Shall be where called for on the plans or in the specifications. The Contractor
shall remove existing castings, install new castings of the style noted on the plans
or in the specifications, and adjust the new castings to the proper elevation. The
old castings remain the property of the Owner and shall be delivered by the
Contractor to a location designated by the Owner.

3.06

RECONSTRUCTING MAl\'ROLES OR CATCH BASINS: Reconstruction of
manholes or catch basins shall apply to where castings cannot be adjusted to the
proper elevation due to the absence or present of sufficient adjusting brick or rings
on the manhole structure. The manhole or catch basin structure &amp;hall be
constructed by one of the following methods:

3.07

II

I
Ill

Ill

Adjusting Rings: Existing covers may be adjusted to the proper elevation
by inserting an Engineer approved, variable adjustable casting into the
existing frame. The adjustable casting shall be capable of diameter
adjusµnent as well as height adjustment

001

A.

Precast Structure: If the manhole is constructed of precast concrete sections, the
top section(s) shall be removed and replaced with a precast concrete section(s) of
such height as to allow for the proposed casting adjustment

B.

Manhole Block or Brick: If the manhole is constructed of manhole block or brick,
remove sufficient rows of block or brick in order to construct the manhole to the
proper grade for casting adjustment
BITUMINOUS SURFACE REMOVAL:
Shall consist of removing a
bituminous surface from a rigid base or removing a bituminous surface from an
aggregate base without the removal of the aggregate base. The method of
removing the bituminous surface shall be approved by the Engineer. The removal
of a bituminous surface and the aggregate base will be classed as Earth
Excavation, except when the bituminous surface is more than 5 inches in
thickness. The removal of bituminous surface will be paid for as Removing
Pavement

02110-3

�I

II
I
I
I

I

-I.
-I

3.08

DISPOSAL OF MATERIALS: Materials salvage.d during the construction of
the project shall become the property of the Contractor unless otherwise shown
on the plans or in the propostl Materials reserve.d for use by the Owner shall be
remove.d wjthout damage to the material and store.d outside the limits of
construction at the location and in the manner approved by the Owner. Materials
that become the property of the Contractor shall be removed from the project
before acceptance of the project. Broken concrete which is matte.d together by
steel reinforcement and all other waste material shall be disposed in conformance
with SECITON O1560 - SPECIAL CONTROLS.

3.09

RESTORATION OF DISTURBED STRUCTURES: Existing structures,
including pavement, curb and gutter, sidewalk and other miscellaneous structures,
disturbed or damage.d as a result of site preparation operations shall be restore.d
or replaced to their original condition by the Contractor at no additional cost to
the Owner.

3.10

BACKFILLING: All trenches, holes and pits resulting from the breaking down
or removal of foundations and misceUaneous structures within the project site shall
be backfille.d in conformance with SECTION 02223 Paragraph 2.02 - BACKFILL
MATERIAL and compacted in conformance with SECTION 01410 - SOILS
COMPACTION AND TESTING.

END OF SECTION

I
I
I
I

-I
-I

001

02110-4

�I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

-II
-

SECTION 02161
SHEETING AND BRACING

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
SHEETING AND BRACING.

1.02

RELATED ¥'\'ORK: Certain sections of the work may be specifically designated
on the plans to be sheeted. This designation was made in order to limit trench
width and protect parallel utilities or adjacent property. In such areas, so
designated on the plans, the Contractor must provide adequate sheeting. In other
areas not specifically designated to be sheeted, the Contractor may excavate in
conformance with State and Federal regulations by electing to shore or by
widening the trench at the top to provide the required slopes.

1.03

REQUIREMENTS: The Contractor shall comply with all Federal, State and
local laws and regulations governing the furnishing and use of safeguards, safety
devices and protective equipment In addition, the Contractor shall take any other
needed actions on his own responsibility to protect the life and health of all
persons and property during construction. The Michigan Department of Labor,
Bureau of Safety and Regulations, is the enforcing agency for both the Federal
and State safety regulations governing construction; the Owner and the Engineer
are not the enforcing agencies to insure compliance with Federal and State safety
regulations.

PART2

PRODUCTS (Not Used)

PART 3

EXECUTION

3.01

INSTALLATION: The Contractor shall furnish and place all sheeting or shoring
and bracing as may be required. for the protection of the work, personnel, the
public, and the adjacent property.

A.

STRUCTIJRES: Sheeting including steel sheet piling, and prone bracing thereof,
shall be installed for the protection of adjacent paving, structures, and other
properties, including existing utilities and structures, as may be required. in the
prosecution of the work.

B.

UTILITIES: Sheeting, including steel sheet piling, shall be installed above the
elevation of the top of the pipe or utility being installed to protect personnel and
pennit proper installation of the work. Existing utilities being crossed by trenches

1111

II

001

02161-1

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

'-

shall be adequately supported to prevent misalignment and damage. The method
of support shall meet the requirements of the applicable utility company.

3.02

C.

ALTERNA T,IVE 1vIBIBODS: The Contractor may, in lieu of tight steel sheeting,
utilize special high trench boxes or other acceptable means to protect the trench
so long as applicable State and Federal safety regulations are met, or unless
sheeting is required as outlined under paragraph 1.02. In no event shall a trench
which is shown on the drawings to be specifically sheeted be wider at the top than
one-half of the depth of the trench, or 20 feet, whichever is less.

D.

RELATION OF TRENCH WIDTII TO SEWER STRENGTII: The Contractor
shall be aware that the strength class of sewer pipe or the pipe bedding may be
influenced by the width of trench at the top of the pipe. In general, the Engineer
has designed for the worst condition assuming a wide trench at the top of the pipe
so that the so called "transition width" determines the load on the pipe.

CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY:
All paving, structures, and other
properties including existing utilities, which are damaged as a result of the lack
of sheeting or shoring, and bracing, or the adequate installation thereof, shall be
repaired by the Contractor at his expense. In addition, where the Contractor is
required to install sheeting or shoring, or elects to do so, he shall provide a
certification in writing from a qualified registered professional engineer attesting
to the adequacy of the proposed sheeting or shoring system(s) for each and every
area or condition where sheeting or shoring is to be used. No sheeting or shoring
shall be constructed without such certification.
E:t--.1D OF SECTION

001

02161-2

�I
I

SECTION 02211
SITE EARTHV\1ORK

I

I
I
I
II
I
II
II
II
II
II
II

II.
II
Ill

PART l

GENERAL

1.01

\VORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
SITE EARTHWORK.

1.02

RELATED V\10RK

A.

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference v.ri.th flow of traffic shall ·be kept to a minimwn.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:

1.

2.

C.

SECTION 01410 SECTION 01560 -

SOILS COMPACTION M1D TESTING
SPECIAL CONTROLS

COORDINATION WTI1I OTIIBR CONTRACTORS: Certain portions of the
work may require completion of construction under other contracts prior to
commencing work under this section. The Contractor shall coordinate his work
and schedule with other contractors to result in complying with the contract
completion date.

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

SUBBASE AND SUBGRADE Ul\TIERCUTTING: Shall conform to 1IDOT
Granular Material Class II.

2.02

~?\IBANKM::ENT MATERIAL: Materials utilized for embankment construction
shall be approved by the Engineer. In general, any natural material which can be
compacted to the required density, contains no organic material, and has a
maximum unit weight of at least 95 pounds per cubic foot may be used. Materials
containing more than 50 percent silt or any frozen material will not be allowed_
Silt is defined as material having a particle size of 0.074 to 0.0005 rrµn.

PART3

EXECUTION

3.01

SITE EARTHWORK: Work performed under this section shall consist of
constructing earth grades by excavating soil or rock and by placing embankments
of fills. This work shall include the salvaging and stockpiling of selected material,

001

02211-1

�I
I

disposing of surplus or unsuitable material, trimming the earth grade, and
maintaining the work in a finished condition until acceptance.

I

A.

I
I

SITE PREPARATION: Undesirable material shall be removed from the grading
limits and salvaged or disposed of as specified herein or as shown on the plans.
1.

I
I
I
I
I
'

I
I
I

-I
"

B.

001

Removing Topsoil: Before removing topsoil, all vegetation of a height
greater than one foot shall be reduced to a height of approximately 6
inches and all such vegetation and all brush, stones, rocks, and any other
objectionable litter or foreign materials shall be removed from the site and
disposed of in confonnance with SECTION 01560 - SPECIAL
CONTROLS. Equipment and methods of operations shall be such as to
avoid the lifting of subsoil. If soil or weather conditions are unsuitable,
the Contractor shall cease and resume removing topsoil upon orders from
the Engineer.
a.

Embankment Areas: Where the embankment is to be 5 feet or less
in height to the pavement surface, the topsoil shall be stripped from
the area within limits of 1 on 1 slopes spreading outward from the
finished shoulders. For embankments upon which a structure is to
be built, the topsoil shall be stripped from an area within limits of
1 on 1 slopes spreading outward in all directions from the bottom
of structure footing. The depth of the topsoil to be removed shall
be as shown on the plans or as directed by the Engineer.

b.

Cut Areas: Topsoil shall be removed within the grading limits.

2.

Salvaging Topsoil: The topsoil may be stocl...l)iled outside the limits of
construction or used as shown on the plans or as directed by the Engineer.
Topsoil stockpiles shall be located and shaped so as to avoid placing
around trunks and over root areas of trees to be preserved or in drainage
courses. The topsoil shall be kept separate from other excavated material.

3.

Salvaging Other Materials: If provided on the plans or in the proposal, or
if directed by the Engineer, old road surfacing of gravel, crushed stone, or
selected excavated materials, shall be removed from the designated areas
for use in such items as earth shoulders, salvaged approaches, temporary
roadway surfacing or other items requiring the use of such materials.
Reasonable care shall be exercised in removing and handling the
designated materials to prevent incorporation of foreign or undesirable
material. When the salvaged material cannot be placed directly in the
contemplated construction, the material shall be stored in stockpiles.

SUBGRADE ill\TDERCUTTING: Including backfilling, shall be performed to
replace material susceptible to frost heaving or differential frost action and
unstable soil conditions, as determined by the Engineer. Removing topsoil will
not be part of subgrade undercutting. Excavation below subgrade in cut sections,
at the transition from cut to fill sections, and any excavation other than peat

02211-2

�I
I
I
I
I
I

excavation that may be required below the topsoil in fill sections will be classified
as Subgrade Undercutting.

II

I
I
I
II
II

C.

11

001

Limits 'of Subgrade Undercutting: After the subgrade has been constructed
to the approximate grade, the Engineer will promptly inspect the grade to
determine if any subgrade undercutting is required and determine the limits
of such undercutting. Where shallow fills are to be placed, the Engineer
will inspect the fill area before any embankment is placed and determine
the limits of the subgrade undercutting if any, before placing any
embankment All deposits of frost heave material v.ithin lines 2 feet
outside the proposed surface, shall be removed to a depth as directed by
the Engineer. Subgrade undercutting shall be performed within the limits
established by the Engineer, and the excavated material shall become the
property of the Contractor.

2.

Backfilling of Subgrade Undercut Sections: Undercut sections shall be
backfilled to the subgrade elevation with MDOT Granular Material Class
II. The degree of compaction shall be in conformance with SECTION
01410 - SOILS COMPACTION AND TESTING.

WASTE MATERIAL AND DEBRJS: Of whatever nature shall
the site at the Contractor's expense.

be removed from

1.

Excess Material: From excavation operations which is not required for fill
or backfill may be spread at the site in spoil areas as shown on the plans.

2.

Hazardous \Vaste: Should such waste material as defined by MD:NR be
encountered during construction, the Contractor shall immediately notify
the Engineer. Removal and disposal of such materials from the site shall
be considered a changed condition.

D.

CONSTRUCTING E1vIBAl\1XMENTS: Shall be done with approved materials as
specified in paragraph 2.02. In addition, embankments shall be constructed with
the maximum allowable lift and degree of compaction conforming to SECTION
01410 - SOILS COMPACTION AND TESTING. In general, embankment
construction at outside air temperatures below 35°F. will not be allowed. If
embankment construction is allowed under such conditions, the Contractor shall
exclude frozen material from any portion of the embankment Any frozen
material on a partially completed fill shall be removed and disposed of prior to
placing additional fill on the embankment

E.

BORROW: Material secured from locations outside the project site will be
considered borrow excavation. The Contractor shall perform all work and provide
all materials and equipment necessary to excavate, haul and place the borrow
material. The Contractor will be held liable for all damages caused by his hauling
operations and will be required to pay for such damages.

-

II
II
II
II

1.

02211-3

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

F.

PREPARATION OF SUBGR.ADE SURFACE: Where the natural soils form the
subbase, the subgrade shall be scarified and blended to a minimum depth of 6
inches to obtain uniformity across all lines of change in soil types. The subgrade
shall be compacted. in conformance with SECTION 01410 - SOILS
COMPACTION AND TESTil\G.

E:t\1) OF SECTION

I
I

-

•

1,:

--

-II

II
II
II

001

02211-4

�I
I
I
I
I

SECTION 02222
EXCAVATION FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS

·-·

I
I
I
I
I
I

,:
•
•
•

PART 1

GENERAL
WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials and perfonning all
operations in connection with EXCAVATION FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS.

1.02

RELATED WORK

A.

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference with flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:
1.

C.

2.
3.
4.

SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION

5.

SECTION 02227 -

6.

SECTION 02901 -

-

SOILS COMPACTION AND TESTING
SPECIAL CONTROLS
SHEETING AND BRACING
BEDDING A1'.1D BACKFILLING FOR UTILITY
SYSTEMS
BORING, JACKlliG AND TUNNELING FOR
UTILITY SYSTEMS
RESTORATION AND CLEAN-UP

DEVIATIONS: \Vherever obstructions not shown on the plans are encountered
during the progress of the work and interference to such an extent that an
alteration in the plan is required., the Engineer shall have the authority to change
the plans and order a deviation from the line and grade or arrange with the ovmers
of the structures for the removal, relocation or reconstruction of the obstructions.
If the change in plans results in a change in the amount of work by the
Contractor, such altered work shall be done on the basis of payment to the
Contractor for extra work or credit.

1.

001

01410
01560
02161
02223

Contractor Downtime: In the event that the above mentioned interference
causes the Contractor to cease operations temporarily, he shall immediately
inform the Engineer through the representative on the job or the Engineer's
office. The Engineer wilL within one normal working day, defined as 8
hours between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M., inform the
Contractor how to proceed or to move his operations to another portion of
the work without any additional cost to the Owner for Contractor
downtime or for relocation to another portion of the work.

02222-1

�I
I
I

D.

I
I
I

-I
-II
•
•

SUBSURFACE EXPLORATIONS: Whenever, in the opinion or the Engineer, it
is necessary to explore and excavate to determine the location of the existing
underground structures, the Contractor shall make explorations and excavations for
such purposes at no cost to the Owner. All apparent underground conflicts shall
be excavated in advance for utility systems to determine any actual interference.

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

BACKFILL FOR UNDERClJITING: Shall conform to MDOT Granular
Material Class II Granular Material or other material approved by the Engineer.

2.02

FLEXIBLE PIPE REQUIREMENTS: When undercutting exceeds 12" for
flexible pipe (PVC or corrugated pipe) backfill for undercutting shall conform to
MDOT requirements for 3 lA aggregate.

PART 3

EXECUTION

3.01

EXCAVATION AND PREPARATION OF TRENCH

001

A.

CAUTION IN EXCAVATION: The Contractor shill proceed with caution in the
excavation and preparation of the trench so that the exact location of underground
structures, both known and unknown, may be detennined. The Contractor shall
be held responsible for the repair of such structures if broken or otherwise
damaged as a result of excavation at no additional cost to the Owner.

B.

EXCAVATION TO GRADE: The trench shall be excavated to the depth required
so as to provide a uniform and continuous bearing and support for the pipe per
details shown in Section 02223, Bedding and backfilling for Utility Systems.

C.

EXCAVATION BELOW GRADE
1.

Contractor's Fault: If the Contractor undercuts the trench bottom below
plan grade, the trench shall be restored to plan grade with compacted
granular material or stone (at the option of the Engineer) at no additional
cost to the Owner.

2.

Unstable Ground Conditions:
If unstable ground conditions are
encountered at the plan grade, the Engineer will direct the Contractor to
excavate the unstable material to a stable base. The Contractor shall then
place and compact crushed stone, granular materials or other suitable
material, approved by the Engineer, to estabLish the plan grade.

3.

Compaction of Granular Material: Shall conform to Section 01410, Soils
Compaction and Testing.

02222-2

�I
I

D.

I
I
I

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

--"
II

001

WIDTH OF TRENCH: The \lr1dth of the trench shall be ample to pennit the pipe
to be laid and joined properly. In general, the Engineer has designed for the worst
condition assuming a wide trench at the top of the pipe so that the so called
"transition width" determines the load on the pipe.

1.

Bedding Requirements: When sand bedding is used, the trench widths
shall be as required to allow specified compaction of the bedding. If stone
bedding is used. a minimum of 6 inches clearance shall be provided on
each side of the pipe.

2.

Safety: The trench v.idth shall be such that safety is provided at all times.
In this regard, it shall be the responsibility of the Contractor to provide a
safe trench for working at all times. Trench width and excavation shall
meet all requirements of the Sate of Michigan Safety Inspector, the
Department of Labor and MI-OSHA. Sheeting and bracing shall conform
to Section 02161, Sheeting and Bracing.

E.

REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF WATER: The Contractor shall provide
adequate pumping, bailing, or other drainage facilities for removal and disposal
of water from the excavation. These facilities shall consist of sumping,
dewatering wells, well points or any other system designed and operated to
remove groundwater to provide a dry and stable trench.

F.

BORING, JACKING AND TIJNNELING: At certain permanent pavement and
railroad crossings, the Contractor shall bore and jack, or tunnel utilities in
conformance with Section 02227, Boring, Jacking and Tunneling for Utility
Systems.

G.

OPEN CUTTING OF PERMANENT PAVEMENT

1.

General: Where utilities are to be constructed within the rights-of-way of
county, State or Federal highways or railroads, an application will be
applied for by the Owner with the respective agency/agencies and shall be
executed by the Owner upon fulfillment of requirements by the Contractor.
The Contractor shall provide any bonds or assurances required by the
agency/agencies. Whenever the specifications and plans conflict with the
requirements of the permit, the requirements of the pennit shall govern.

2.

Pavement Removal:
Prior to excavation through all hard surface
pavement, including sidewalks, the pavement shall be sawcut at such
places to allow approximately 12 inches of undisturbed earth between the
cut and the top edge of the trench. In lieu of sawcuts the pavement may
be removed to a clean line at construction joints or contraction joints as
approved by the Engineer.

02222-3

�I
I
I

H.

OPEN CUTITNG MTD Tl.11'1'1:LING OF TREES

1.

Open Cutting: Where noted on the drawings, trees up to two inches (2")
in diameter, may be balled, removed, and reinstalled after backfilling
operations, or replaced in conformance with Section 02901, Restoration
and Clean-up. Trees between two inches (2") and eight inches (8") may
be removed and replaced by approved tree space if acceptable to the
Engineer. Trees eight inches (8") in diameter and smaller shall not be
open cut closer than four feet (4') and shall be tied back to a dead.man.
Trunks or limbs shall be protected from damage. Trees eight inches (8")
in diameter and larger shall not be open cut closer than the radius in
inches multiplied by one foot; i.e., a twelve inch tree shall not be open cut
closer than six feet (6') and shall be tunneled within that radius.

2.

Tunneling: Tunneling operations adjacent to or under trees shall begin at
end points which fall outside a radius designated above.

I
I
I

-I
-Ill

END OF SECTION

001

02222-4

�i
i
ii
II

•II

SECTION 02223
BEDDING AND BACKFILLING FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS

PART 1

GENERAL
'WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials and performing all
operations in connection with BEDDING AND BACKFILLING FOR UTILITY
SYSTEMS .

1.02

II

RELATED WORK

A.

REQUlREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference with flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum. Special attention
shall be made to the interrelationship between types of bedding and class of piped
material.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:

1.

2.
3.

4.
5.

SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION

01410
01560
02222
02901
03001

-

SOILS COMPACTION AND TESTING
SPECIAL CONTROLS
EXCAVATION FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS
RESTORATION AND CLEAN-UP
CONCRETE

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL: Includes all specified bedding material from 4
inches below the pipe to 12 inches above the top of the pipe.

A.

GRANULAR BEDDlNG: Shall be well graded granular materials conforming to
MDOT granular material Oass II.

B.

STONE BEDDING

C.

001

1.

Rigid Pipes: Shall be stone conforming to MDOT Specification 8.02 for
6A coarse aggregate.

2.

Flexible Pipes (PVC or Corrugated Pipe):
Specification 8.02 for 3 lA aggregate.

Shall conform to MDOT

CONCRETE: Shall be Class B wet mix concrete conforming to Section 03001,
Concrete.

02223-1

�-11

D.

I
ii
I

BACKFILL l\1A TERIAL: Includes all trench material above the pipe bedding
material to the topsoil, aggregate base course, or grade.

2.02

•II

A.

BACKFILL MATERIAL FOR AREAS OUTSIDE PERMANENT PA VE11ENT
AREAS: When the type of backfill material is not indicated on the plans or in
the specifications, the Contractor may backfill with excavated material, provided
that the excavated material consists of loam, clay, sand, gravel or other materials
approved by the Engineer. All backfill material shall be free from cinders, ashes,
refuse, vegetable or organic material, boulders, rocks or stones, or other material
which in the opinion of the Engineer is unsuitable. However, from one foot above
the top of the pipe to grade, suitable material containing stones up to 6 inches in
their greatest dimension may be used. Backfill shall be placed to the level
required for final restoration in conformance with Section 02901, Restoration and
Clean-up.

II

I

•
•
•
•II
•
•
•
•

FLEXIBLE PIPE BEDDil\G (PVC OR CORRUGATED PIPE): Shall be
approved by the Engineer and graded to provide adequate sidewall support,
compactibility, and to prevent loss of support through migration of trench wall
material into •the bedding or migration of bedding material into the trench wall or
bottom. Where in place trench materials are clay, silt, fine sand or a mixture
thereof, the bedding material shall contain sufficient fines and be graded such that
there are essentially no voids when compacted.

B.

BACKFILL

MATERIAL UNDER PER11Al\TENT PAVEMENTS OF
SIDEWALKS: Shall be sand,s gravel or other granular material conforming to

Section 01410, paragraph 1.03A, Granular Materials, approved by the Engineer.
Use of excavated trench material will be allowed only if it conforms to Section
01410, paragraph 1.03A, Granular Materials. Backfill shall be placed to the level
required for final restoration in conformance with Section 02901, Restoration and
Clean-up .

PART3

EXECUTION

3.01

GENERAL: Excavation, undercutting, trench widths and dewatering shall
conform to Section 02222, Excavation for Utility Systems. Installation of pipes
and structures shall be in accordance with the applicable sections of this
specification.

3.02

OPEN TRENCH: The length of trench allowed to be left open before backfilling
shall be a maximum of 100 feet, or as directed by the Engineer. The trench, if
bedded to one foot above the top of the pipe, shall still be considered as an open
trench.

3.03

PIPE SUPPORT IN UNSTABLE SOIL: Where the bottom of the trench at
subgrade is found to consist of material which is unstable to such a degree that
it cannot be removed and replaced with an approved material thoroughly
compacted in place to support the pipe properly, the Contractor shall construct

001

02223-2

�-ll

supports as directed by the Engineer. Cost of such supports shall be negotiated
at the time of construction.

3.04

CONSTRUCTION IN FILL SECTIONS: Where it is necessary to lay pipe in
a fill area, all unstable or unsuitable material shall be removed and slopes steeper
than 1 to 2 shall be stepped before fill material is placed. The embankment shall
be of suitable material on 1 to 2 fill slopes and shall be not less than five
diameters plus four feet wide at the invert of the pipe and shall be continued up
to provide not less than one foot of cover over the pipe. Compaction shall
conform to Section 01410, Soils Compaction and Testing.

3.05

PIPE BEDDING: All trenches shall be bedded by hand, from the bottom of the
trench to one foot above the pipe with approved material and compacted by
tamping. Bedding material shall be deposited in the trench for its full width on
each side of the pipe, fittings and appurtenances. Special care shall be taken to
assure that there are no voids under the pipe haunches and that the pipe line and
grade is not disturbed. Bedding dimensions and details shall conform to the
appended tables.

II
II

-II
II"
•
•

•

A.

CONCRETE BEDDING: The pipe and fittings shall be adequately blocked and
otherwise supported to maintain line and grade during concrete placement
Following concrete placement, no subsequent bedding or backfill operations shall
be performed until the concrete has obtained adequate strength, which is 48 hours
unless an accelerating admixture is used wherein the time may be reduced to 24
hours with the consent of the Engineer. Concrete bedding shall conform to the
dimensions as given in the appended tables and reinforcement if required, shall be
as detailed on the drawings .

B.

FLEXIBLE PIPE BEDDING: Due to sidewall support requirements, flexible pipe
bedding shall be placed with extreme care. Wherever trench undercut with porous
stone with a high void ratio is used for dewatering, special methods and materials
for bedding shall be used as detailed on the appended sheets.

3.06

BACKFILL: Backfill shall be carefully placed and compacted in lifts. From the
top of the pipe bedding material to four feet above the pipe, compaction shall be
with small vibrating plate compactors and heavy wheel driven impactors shall not
be used.

A.

001

BACKFILLING UNDER PERMANENT PAVEMENTS: Permanent pavements
include gravel, bituminous concrete, and concrete surfaces streets, curbs,
sidewalks, driveways, or similar structures. Where the excavation for utilities cuts
through permanent pavements, the entire backfill to subgrade shall consist of
granular material approved by the Engineer. Granular backfill shall be placed to
the outside edges of shoulders or two feet outside the back of curb.

02223-3

�-I
I
I

I

•••
•
•
•
•

1.

Maintenance of Street Cuts: If replacement of permanent pavement will
not be completed \lt1trun 5 days of excavation, the Contractor shall
construct and maintain a 4 inch bituminous base patch on all street cuts
until fhe original type of surfacing is replaced.

2.

Maintenance of Sidewalk Cuts: In sidewalks, sand backfill shall be
constructed. to the existing sidewalk grade, and maintained. until the
sidewalk can be poured. If replacement of the sidewalk will not be
completed within 5 days of excavation, the Contractor shall construct and
maintain a 4 inch bituminous base patch on all sidewalk cuts until the
original type of surfacing is replaced.

B.

BACKFILLING AT STRUCTURES: All backfill placed within three (3) feet of
manholes or other underground structures shall be approved sand compacted in
conformance with Section 01410, Soils Compaction and Testing.

C.

BACKFILL AT EXISTING UTILITIES: Existing utilities shall be protected
during backfilling operations and backfilled in accordance with the requirements
and standards of the company or municipality having jurisdiction over the utility.
When backfill requirements under utilities are not set forth by the company or
municipality, the Contractor shall backfill in conformance with paragraph 3.04.
Existing utility lines damaged during, or as a result of backfilling operations, shall
be repaired by the Contractor at his expense.

3.07

BEDDING AND BACKFILLING IN FREEZING WEATHER: Bedding and
backfilling shall not be constructed in freezing weather, except by permission of
the Engineer. Bedding and backfill shall not consist of frozen material and no fill
shall be made where the material already in the trench is frozen .

3.08

COMPACTION: Compaction lifts and required densities for bedding and
backfilling shall conform to Section 01410, Soils Compaction and Testing.

3.09

RESTORATION AND CLEAN-UP:
Restoration and Clean-up.

END OF SECTION

001

02223-4

Shall conform to Section 02901,

�~
- ••• ----- • .• - - •.:•.. •.- -\-I- FOR RIGID PIPE

BEDDING

GRANULAR
BEDDING
/"BA.CKFILL _./

. ·.~.

·t.:·:\'.'•:·•:·:·•::)
..... ..
.:-.:·•:
,

z

··:,.

'.::·:.:-:}

L::}\..:

Yft::•i
·
:
?
:
/?
... .

,

GRANULAR
BEDDl~G

..·.

. .·.

.. :

:.\: .::
;

•

.

.

,(.-~.•);;j¾/.

:

.:·o •: .. .:'

CONCRETE-41~

~!,//
/ //,
FOR

BEDDING

l.,.J

I
\,"'I

( pyc · AND

/

BACKFILL

✓-

:i

...

' • O&lt;{U .

,' •

••

Z 1-:i;

[}i&amp;..
' • : , .• ;

:: .• · ,

NORMAL BEDDING

·.··

~ . . ..
:,• .' :·

· ••.

-. .

~

'('\J

.

•rrp..
q•·. 1,,'\ □••
• 11• ·!)1
o. 'l:
'I.
•
.ti', o
h."Pb
•
A

••

~

&lt;ti : ., •.. ~)

II.JI
.
0. ~

~ d 1),

•
•

0: o MOOT 31A

l

&lt;J'

~
~

STONE

40 •••

~

,1p:"l,t&gt;'.
t'. •

6,v•'&lt;J-

1

l1J
0.

•

•

/.

z

\ .·.1
: .:.:.·· ~ :·.:;_/. :·: . . :, .

('\J

I,

:·, .:.\··_::.;_::\..... &lt;.~&lt;· 2 58 :'i

: .·

·· :·•. {AT TOP OF PIPE)

;E

u-t•..... w-n...,:

~ :.

AS SPECIFIED .

5 X 0.0. MIN .

• • IJ.. JI- 'l

··.·

BACKFILL _,,

'• ' •'.·_....

BEDDING
•

OEDDING MAT'L

. •, ~

~n:·:; :··.·:,: ;: .·.·:-J:\
MAT'L. AS
SPECIFIED

Pl PE S

CMP)

_,.

•

a:

I•
0

0

4' !MIN .

D :A

llx ·.,FY t... , _. 't, r ~- rli':
";)]\,'iJ:'.1:'·.~;:, ,vv.t
.
f
,

~

I") '

BEDDING FOR UNDER CUT
AND STONE REFILL

g

n.
I

8 EDDING- TYPE 3

FLEXIBLE

~

... _:' ?(::,:
~ . •.(: ;
-'---,-.J&lt;-¢
1•

N
N

N

0.D./2

,

BEDDING - TYPE 2

BEDDING - TYPE I

('\J

\ -.: :.' ·:&gt;·to_
,_ .U./-1&lt;--i

~

/

~

.

. ·:.• ··. ·:

·. ~ ·...:.. :.. ·.,

CLASS B

••
..• , ...
••• ; /•,/ /A/)//// /.
·::.-.•::·,,·

-

..J&lt;---~~

. ..

I

.

z

..
' ..

. .; ·,...:-..:.... :::.:.:·:·/·::;~;

··□

0

..:..:.·.:,.,,,·,·.
...
..
...

\

::'.!:

. ·N. .
.t&lt;·....·.J-':;·o
';•.
.···.

., ,•

AS

'I REO'D.

'11 z
ci ,:

�•••• --- • .• -• :- .• .• • .. - .•..• .• :

,

,

SANITARY SEWERS

0
0
N

ALTERNATIVE PIPE MATERIALS, PIPE CLASS, AND BEDDING TYPE
Refer to Section 02730 - "SANITARY SEWERS" For Pipe Ma~erial and Installation Specifications.
Nominal Depth
of Cover to
Top of PipeFeet
to 6
to 10
10 to 12
3

V.C.P. (1) BEDDING TYPE
GIi

0
....,
....,

15 to 16
16 to 17
17 to 18

N
l.,.J

I

C1'

(1)

(2)

to

3

&amp;

10"

Type 1

12 II

15 11

Type 1

Type 1

6 II I · 8 II

I

-

10 11

Class 51

PIPE CLASS
12 II

RCP - 15 11 TO
•,

16 11

,

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

Type 2
II
II

II

Type 3

II

II

Type 3

Type 2
II

Type 3

Type 2
Type 3

18 11

Class 50 Class 50

II

Type 2

18 to 20
20 to 22
22 to 24
0

8 II

Type 1

6

12 to 13
13 to 14
14 to 15

I

D. I.

PIPE
CLASS
IV
V

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

l
1
3
3

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

II

11
II

II

II

....., .. ,,......
...
II
,...
........, ......
\;;,;;,::,:;,;;\;;,:;
.........
,
..
,
.
,'-.,
....
,
..
,
..
,
......
,
..
,
......
·············· \i;t!;\;;\:it!;\!;\;;, ..
\!; t:;\!il!: t::ri\;i ............................
.... , .. , .. , ..............
~=:~::
::: !::
,~::
:, !::
,:,,:,
, :, !::
, :,u,
,:,

Class 51
II

II
II

,:-,:•► !•U•)!• ► !•&gt;I•

Over 24

--

Pipe and Bedding Per plan Details.

All V.C.P to be extra strength per Section 02730 - SANITARY SEWERS.
Bedding for D.I. Pipe to be Type 1.

Pipe Class and Bedding shall be per above table unless otherwise shown on the Plans.
Cross Hatched Areas - Use of particular pipe material not allowed.

WATER MAINS
Refer to Section 02665 -

11

1
1

II

II

II

1
1
1

II

II

II

BEDDING
TYPE

III

.

JO"

WATER MAINS" for pipe material and installation specifications.

1.

Ductile Iron - All bedding shall be Type 1.
Pipe class shall be minimum of Class 52, as
specified as a minimum for pressure rating, or as noted on the plans.

2.

Polyvinyl Chloride - Conform to Paragraph 2.01.p. of this specification.

3
3
3

�I

I
I
I
I

•
•
•

SECTION 02227
BORING, JACKING Al\1D TUNI\1ELING FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

'WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials and perforrning all
operations in connection with BORING, JACKING Al\TD/OR TUNNELING FOR
UTILITY SYSTEMS.

1.02

RELATED WORK

A.

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference with flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:
1.
2.

C.

•
1.03

001

3.
4.
5.

SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION

01410
01560
02161
02222
02223

-

6.

SECTION 02901 -

SOILS COMPACTION Al\TD TESTING
SPECIAL CONTROLS
SHEETING AND BRACING
EXCAVATION FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS
BEDDING Al\TD BACKFILLING FOR lITILITY
SYSTEMS
RESTORATION Al\TD CLEAN-UP

PERMITS FOR BORING, JACKING OR TUNNELING OPERATIONS:
Applications for such pennits have been filed by the Owner with the respective
Agency/Agencies and shall be executed by the Owner and Contractor upon
fulfillment of the Administrative requirements contained herein. Whenever the
specifications and plans conflict with the requirements of the pennit, the
requirements of the pennit shall govern.
ADMINISTRATIVE REQUIREJ\fENTS

A.

DRAWINGS TO BE FURNISHED: The Contractor shall furnish a drawing of
the jacking pit showing size, proposed location, details of sheeting and bracing,
and the type and capacity of jacking and excavating equipment to be used to
install the pipe for approval of the agency having jurisdiction.

B.

SCHEDULE OF OPERATIONS: The Contractor shall submit, with the drav.rings
required above, a schedule of proposed operations showing dates he proposed to
start work, daily and weekly work schedules and his estimated ti.me to complete
work for each crossing called for under this Contract

C.

SPECIAL INSURANCE, BONDS AND PERMITS: The governing authority may
require special insurance coverage and a performance bond. The Contractor shall
02227-1

�I
I
I
I
I

comply with the requirements of the pennit and agency, to f umish satisfactory
evidence of this special insurance and/or bonding before proceeding with any work
on or within such right-of-way.

D.
1.04

I
I
I·
I
I

•
•
•
•
•
•
•II

II

GE:t\TERAL: Inspection costs incurred by the Owner shall be paid by the
Contractor when so indicated in the supplemental technical specifications.
DE VIATIO NS: \Vherever obstructions not shown on the plans are encountered
during the progress of the work and interference to such an extent that an
alteration in the plan is required, the Engineer shall have the authority to change
the plans and order a deviation from the line and grade or arrange with the owners
of the structures for the removal, relocation or reconstruction of the obstructions.
If the change in plans results in a change in the amount of work by the
Contractor, such altered work shall be done on the basis of payment to the
Contractor for extra work or credit.

A.

In the event that the above mentioned
CONTRACTOR DOWNTIME:
interference causes the Contractor to cease operations temporarily, he shall
immediately inform the Engineer through the representative on the job or the
Engineer's office. The Engineer will, within one normal working day, defined as
8 hours between the hours of 7:00 A.M. and 6:00 P.M., inform the Contractor
how to proceed or to move his operations to another portion of the work without
any additional cost to the Owner for Contractor downtime or for relocation to
another portion of the work.

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

BACKFILL FOR UNDERCUTTING:
paragraph 2.01, Backfill for Undercutting .

2.02

CASING PIPE: Shall be the size, type and class, including steel yield strength,
as shown on the plans and noted herein, except as may be modified by the permit
issued by the jurisdictional agency.

2.03

CASING PIPE VOID: Shall be filled using either stone, sand or grout in
accordance with the specifications or as required by the pennit agency .

PART3

EXECUTION

3.01

BORING, JACKING AND TUNNELING: At certain permanent pavement and
railroad crossings, the Contractor shall bore and jack, or tunnel utilities in
accordance with the regulations of the municipality, county, :MDOT, or
transportation agency having jurisdiction.

A.
001

Shall conform to Section 02223,

EXCAVATION OF BORING AND TUNNELING PITS:
Section 02222, Excavation for Utility Systems.
02227-2

Shall conform to

�I
I
I
I
I

B.

3.02

JACK.ING

A.

JACKING OPERATION: Bracing, backstops and jacks shall be so designed and
of sufficient rating so that the jacking operation can be progressed without
stoppage until the leading edge of the pipe has at least reached the limit specified
in the pennit This operation shall be conducted without hand-mining ahead of
the pipe or use of any type of boring or augering equipment Excavated material
shall be removed from the pipe as excavation progresses, and no accumulation of
such material within the pipe will be permitted.

I
I
I

•,

B.

PILOT TUNNEL: When jacking the larger diameters of pipe, a pilot tunnel may
be constructed first to insure accuracy of grade and alignment The dimensions
and support of the pilot tunnel will be optional with the Contractor subject to the
approval of the Engineer but s~ch approval shall in no way relieve the Contractor
of the responsibility for damage of any nature which might occur as a result of the
method used or relieve the Contractor of the responsibility for maintaining proper
line and grade.

C.

PIPE SECTION JOINTING: Concrete pipe joints shall be protected from
crushing by placing a ½-inch rope or other approved. material in the joints.
Welded steel plate pipe sections shall be field welded together as recommended
by the manufacturer and approved. by the Engineer.

I
I

•
•
•

SAFETY: The boring and tunneling pit trench width shall be such that safety is
provided at all times. In this regard, it shall be the responsibility of the Contractor
to provide a safe trench for working at all times. Trench width and excavation
shall meet all requirements of the State and Michigan Safety Inspector, the
Department of Labor and MI-OSHA. Sheeting and bracing shall conform to
Section 02161, Sheeting and Bracing, of these specifications.

3.03

TUNNELING: Care shall be exercised in trimming the surface of excavated
sections in order that the liner pipe fits snugly against undisturbed. earth. The top
of the tunnel excavation shall be supported by a cutting shield, and the excavation
shall not be advanced. ahead of such support. The vertical face of the excavation
shall be supported as necessary to prevent sloughing. At any interruption of the
tunneling operation, the liner shall be completely bulkheaded. As soon as the
liner pipe has been placed and the alignment approved, a uniform mixture of 1:6
cement to sand grout shall be placed under pressure between the liner and the
surrounding earth. Grout holes for 1½-inch pipe spaced at approximately 3 feet
around the periphery, and every five feet of liner shall be provided. Grouting
shall start at the lowest hole and proceed upwards progressively and
simultaneously on both sides of the liner.

3.04

001

BORING: 'This method employs the use of a rock roller type bit or a plate bit
made up of individual roller cutter units which are solidly welded to the pipe
sleeve being installed. and which turns as it is advanced. The pipe shall be turned
for its entire length from the boring machine to the head to give the bit the
necessary cutting action against the ground being bored. A high density slurry
02227-3

�I
I

(drilling mud) shall be injected through a small supply line to the head which acts
as a cutter lubricant and as a liquid carrier to bring back the spoil to the boring
pits. This sl1¥1)' shall be injected at the rear of the cutter unit to prevent any
jutting action ahead of the pipe. The boring machine shall run on a set of steel
rails and be advanced (thus advancing the pipe) by a set of hydraulic jacks. All
machine operations are to be carried out from a pit constructed to the requirements
of the pennit The method shall be the same whether earth or rock is being bored.
Methods of a similar nature may be approved but are subject to review by the
authority granting the pennit

I
I

I
I
II
I

I
I
I
I

•
•
•
•
•
•
•

3.05

OBSTRUCTIONS: If an obstruction is encountered during installation to stop
the forward action of the pipe, and it becomes evident that it will be impossible
to advance the pipe, operations shall cease, and the pipe will be abandoned in
place and filled with grout

3.06

MAINTENANCE OF TRAFFIC: \Vhen work is done in highway rights-of-way,
all work shall be as previously specified. \\Then work is done in railroad rights-ofway, the Contractor shall contact the local or St.ate authorities having jurisdiction
over such area regarding protection required to maintain traffic. All required
protective devices and services shall be provided and maintained by the
Contractor.

3.07

BACKFILLING OF BORING AND Tll1\TNELING PITS: Shall conform to
Section 02223, Bedding and Backfilling for Utility Systems. Compaction shall be
as specified under Section 01410, Soils Compaction and Testing.

END OF SECTION

001

02227-4

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

•
•
•
•II

SECTION 02231
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE.

1.02

RELATED WORK

A.

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference with flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited. to:
1.

2.

SECTION 01410 SECTION 01560 -

SOILS COMPACTION Al\1D TESTING
SPECIAL CONTROLS

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

AGGREGATE: Aggregate base materials shall conform to MDOT Specification
22A Series aggregate.

2.02

001

A.

SINGLE SOURCE: It is the intent of these specifications to secure materials
from a single source and to avoid repetitive testing of various sources of aggregate
for the convenience of the Contractor.

B.

AGGREGATE PRODUCTION: Prior to any request to the Engineer for approval
of aggregate base material, the Contractor or his supplier shall create a stockpile
of an appropriate amount for the size project

C.

TESTING OF SOURCE: Prior to approval and placement of the aggregate base
course material, an independent testing laboratory, selected. by the Engineer, shall
take representative samples of aggregate base course materials from the stockpile
and test said samples for compliance with the specified. aggregate gradation. Tests
required for second sources or failed tests shall be paid by the Contractor.

CHEMICAL ADDITIVES: Chemical additives may be calcium chloride or
calcium-magnesium chloride solution.

02231-1

�I
I

PART 3

EXECUTION

-

3.01

I
I

PREPARATION OF SUBGRADE: The subgrade shall be smoothed and
trimmed to the required line, grade and cross-section within a tolerance of-¾ to
¾ of an inch 'to receive the base course and shall be compacted in conformance
with Section 01_4 10, Soils Compaction and Testing. The subgrade thus formed
shall be maintained in a smooth and compacted condition until the base course has
been placed. No base course shall be placed on the subgrade until it has been
approved by the Engineer.

3.02

CHEl\.1ICAL ADDITIVE: A chemical additive may be added to the aggregate
base course material in conformance with MOOT specification 3.01.05 upon
approval by the Engineer.

3.03

AGGREGATE BASE COURSE PLACEMENT

I
I

II

I
I

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

3.04

A.

EQUJPMENT: The use of motor graders and other approved equipment will be
allowed during spreading, depositing and compacting operations.

B.

PLACEMENT: Where the required thickness of the aggregate base course is 6
inches or less, the material may be spread and compacted in a similar manner.
The aggregate base shall have a moisture content sufficient to obtain optimum
moisture content. Aggregate base shall not be placed during freezing or other
unfavorable weather conditions.

C.

COMPACTION: The spreading work shall be followed by vibrating compactors
or pneumatic tired rollers until required. density has been attained. Special care
shall be exercised. to secure proper compaction adjacent to curb lines. Compaction
shall conform to Section 01410, Soils Compaction and Testing.

D.

GRADING TOLERANCE: The finished surface shall be shaped to the specified
crown and established grade to within a tolerance of-¾ to ¾ of an inch. Twentyfour (24) hours prior to placing of any surface course on the prepared base, the
Contractor shall notify the Engineer, who will check the grade and crown at
proper intervals to verify compliance with the grading and shaping tolerance. Any
section not meeting tolerance shall be reshaped before the Engineer grants
approval to place surface material.

E.

MAINTENANCE: The Contractor shall, without additional cost to the Owner, be
required to regrade and reshape the finished surface if the surface becomes
damaged during any interval between completion of base course and placing of
bituminous surface material .

TESTING: After placement of the aggregate base course, the finished base
course shall be tested for compliance with the compaction requirements of Section
01410, Soils Compaction and Testing.
END OF SECTION

001

02231-2

�I
I

I
I
I
I
I

SECTION 02512
BITl.Th1INOUS BASE COURSE

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
the construction of BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE.

1.02

RELATED WORK

A.

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference v.rith flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:

I

•
•
•
•
•II

1.

2.
3.

SECTION 01410 SECTION 01560 SECTION 02231 -

SOILS COMPACTION MTO TESTING
SPECIAL CONTROLS
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

MATERIALS: The composition of the bituminous base course mix shall
conform to the following aggregate and asphalt cement specifications .
A.

BASE COURSE: Shall be an :MDOT stabilization mix as indicated on the plans
or in the specifications.

B.

ASPHALT CEMENT: 85-100 penetration grade asphalt cement

2.02

PROPORTIONS: The Contractor shall submit to the Engineer, for review, a
laboratory Marshall mix design representative of the mixture to be placed by the
Contractor. The bituminous mixture shall conform to "Composition of Bituminous
Mixtures", subsection 7.10.06 of the MDOT Standard Specifications .

2.03

LABORATORY TESTING: Representative samples of the bituminous base
material will be taken at the job site and submitted to an independent testing
laboratory, selected by the Engineer, for determination of aggregate gradation and
asphalt cement content

II
001

02512-1

�I
I
I
I
II

•
•II

PART 3

EXECUTION

3.01

SUBBASE: The aggregate subbase must be approved by the Engineer prior to
placement of µie bituminous base course. Placement of aggregate subbase shall
conform to Section 02231, Aggregate Base Course. Compaction of the subbase
shall conform to Section 01410, Soils Compaction ~d Testing.

3.02

EQUIP1\1ENT: The bituminous base course shall be placed by means of an
approved self-propelled mechanical paver or other suitable spreading equipment
approved by the Engineer prior to commencement of work.

3.03

PLACEMENT: Placement of the bituminous base course shall conform to
MOOT Specifications 4.00.01 through 4.00.17, except as herein modified.

3.04

S11OOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS: Shall conform to :MDOT Specification
4.00.12.

E?\1D OF SECTION

II

001

02512-2

�I
I
I
I
II

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•II

SECTION 02513
BITUMINOUS LEVELING/SURFACE COURSE

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in conjunction with
the construction of BITTJMINOUS LEVELING/SURFACE COURSE.

1.02

RELATED WORK

A.

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference with flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum .

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:
1.
2.

3.
4. .

SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION

01410
01560
02231
02512

-

SOILS COMPACTION AND TESTING
SPECIAL CONTROLS
AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
BTilJMINOUS BASE COURSE

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

1\1ATERIALS: The composition of the bituminous leveling/surface course mix
shall conform to one of the following :MDOT asphalt mixture specifications except
modified where indicated.

001

A.

LEVELING COURSE: Shall be an MDOT stabilization mix as indicated on the
plans or in the specifications.

B.

SURFACE (TOP) COURSE: Shall be an MDOT stabilization mix as indicated
on the plans or in the specifications .

C.

BOND COAT: Shall be an :MDOT Specification SS-lh asphalt emulsion:

D.

ASPHALT CE:tvIBNT: Shall have a penetration grade index of 85-100, unless
otherwise indicated on the plans or in the specifications. In general, the asphalt
cement content for leveling mixtures shall be 5.0 to 6.0 percent based upon
percent asphalt by weight of the total mix. The bitumen content of the top course
shall be designed to have up to 0.5 percent more bitumen than the optimum
specified for the leveling course.

02513-1

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

•
•
•
•

2.02

PROPORTIONS: The Contractor shall submit to the Engineer, for review, a
laboratory Marshall mix design representative of the mixture to be placed by the
Contractor. The bituminous mixture shall conform to "Composition of Bituminous
Mixtures", su9section 7.10.06 of the MOOT Standard Specifications.

2.03

LABO RA TORY TESTING: Representative samples of the bituminous material
will be taken at the job site and submitted to an independent testing laboratory,
selected by the Engineer, for determination of aggregate gradation and asphalt
content

PART 3

EXECUTION

3.01

ADJUSTING UTILITY CASTING AND COVERS: Shall conform to Section
02110, Site Preparation.

3.02

PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS MIXTURE(S) ON AN AGGREGATE
BASE COURSE

A.

CONDIDO1\11NG AGGREGATE SURFACE:
Prior to placement of the
bituminous mixture(s), the aggregate surface shall be shaped to the required grade
and cross-section in conformance with Section 02231, Aggregate Base Course.
Where the aggregate surface is irregular, the use of a scarifier may be required.
Additional aggregate shall be placed as directed by the Engineer when it is
required to shape and consolidate the surface. Unless otherwise noted, the shaped
surface shall be rolled to provide thorough compaction. Wetting may be required
to facilitate shaping the surface and to assist in compaction of the subbase in
conformance with Section 01410, Soil Compaction and Testing. The surface thus
formed shall be maintained in a smooth and compacted condition until it is paved.
Immediately before paving, all excess loose material remaining on the surface
shall be removed to the shoulder. The length of existing road which is prepared
and conditions for paving shall be determined by the Engineer.

B.

PLACEMENT: Placement of the bituminous base course shall conform to MOOT
Specifications 4.00.01 through 4.00.17.

3.03

PLACEMENT OF BITUMJNOUS MIXTURE(S)
BITUMINOUS OR CONCRETE SURFACE
A.

EXISTING

PREP ARING EXISTING PAVEMENT

1.

001

ON

Removing Bituminous Patching: Existing bituminous patches of ¾-inch
thickness or more, and bituminous patches of less than ¾-inch thickness
with a high bitumen content which may cause bleeding or instability, shall
be removed and patched in accordance with the following paragraph,
Wedging and Patching.

02513-2

�I
I
I
I
I

I

-I
•
•
•II

3.04

2.

Wedging and Patching: All holes and depressions in the pavement section
and all spaces caused by removing old surface material shall be wedged
with a Bituminous :Mixture as determined by the Engineer, placed and
thoroµghly compacted by tamping or rolling in layers of not more than
2½-inches in thickness before constructing the full width of bituminous
pavement

3.

Pavement Joints: The existing joint fillers shall be removed to an
elevation ¾-inch below the surface of the pavement by mechanical or hand
methods. Where existing transverse and longitudinal pavement joints and
cracks are repaired. the existing bituminous surface and any loose or
spalled concrete around the joint shall be filled with Bituminous Patching
Mixture (MOOT No. 1lO0L) and compacted with a machine vibrator or
approved roller. The prepared pavement shall be approved by the
Engineer and the Contractor before placing any bituminous concrete
mixture.

B.

BO!\TD COAT: Prior to application of the bond coat, all existing surfaces shall
be swept clean. The bond coat shall be applied at a rate of 0.10 gallons per
square yard. The material shall be applied immediately ahead of paving
operations for distances of 1,000 feet to 1,500 feet, depending upon traffic
conditions .

C.

PLACEMENT: Placement of the bituminous base course shall conform to MOOT
Specifications 4.00.01 through 4.00.17 .

TfilCKNESS: The required bituminous material and thicbless shall be shown
on the plans or in the specifications. Pavement course thicbless in excess of 2½inches shall be placed in two or more courses.

3.05

SMOOTHNESS REQUIREMENTS: Shall conform to :MDOT Specification
4.00.12.

END OF SECTION

001

02513-3

�I
I

I
i

SECTION 02525
CONCRETE CURB AATJl GUTTER

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
the construction of CONCRETE CURB MTD GUTTER.

1.02

RELATED 'W ORK

I

I

-I
•
•
•
•

A.

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference with flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:
1.

2.
3.

SECTION 01560 SECTION 03001 SECTION 03600 -

SPECIAL CONTROLS
CONCRETE
GROUT

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

CONCRETE: Shall be Class A with a 28 day compressive strength of 3,500 psi.
Materials, mixing, placing and curing shall conform to Section 03001, Concrete.

2.02

REINFORCING STEEL: Shall conform to ASTh1 A615 Grade 40. The size
and location shall be as noted on the plans.

2.03

PREFORMED BITUMINOUS JOINT FILLERS:

Shall consist of a
bituminous mastic composition formed and encased between layers of felt,
conforming to ASTM D2475.

PART3

EXECUTION

3.01

BASE PREPARATION: The Contractor shall excavate or fill, as required, to
within six inches of the proposed curb and gutter base. The Contractor shall place
and compact a bed of sand, bank run gravel or other material equal to MDOT
Granular Material Class II to bring the base to the desired grade. All tree roots
2 inches or more in diameter which are cut in conjunction with the base
preparation shall be painted with Bartlett's Tree Paint, Tanglefoot Tree Paint, or
equal.

001

02525-1

�I

I
I
I
I
I

•
•
•

3.02

LThTE AND GRADE: All curbs are to slope uniformly to the catch basins so that
no standing water forms in the finished gutter. Grades are shown on the plans.

3.03

FORMS: Shall
be of such design of steel or wood as to insure the accurate
t
maintenance of lines and grades and shall extend for the full depth of the required
concrete. Flexible strips may be used where necessary on curves.

3.04

JOINTS: Expansion joints shall be 1-inch thick and placed at 400 foot intervals
along the curb, at all street returns, within 20 feet each side of structures, and at
the end of each day's pour. Contraction joints shall be placed at 40 foot
maximum intervals. For both expansion and contraction joints, the reinforcing
steel shall be broken each side of the joint at a distance of 6-inches minimum to
18-inches maximum. Joint filler shall extend to the full depth of the joint, and the
top shall be recessed ¼- to ½-inch from the finished surface of the structure.
Plain of weakness joints shall be placed every 10 feet

3.05

PLACING CONCRETE: No concrete shall be placed until the subgrade and
forms have been reviewed by the Engineer. The subgrade shall be wetted and the
concrete deposited to the proper depth and spaded or vibrated sufficiently to insure
satisfactory consolidation prior to finishing.

A.

B.

FINISIIlNG: The curb and gutter shall be rounded with an approved finishing
tool having a radius of 1/4-inch to the dimensions shown on the standard details .
Patching, when necessary shall be with concrete from the mixture used in the
curb. The finished surface shall not vary more than 1/8-inch in 10 feet from the
established grade when check with a 10 foot straightedge. Voids in the curb back
shall be patched. with a grout mixture confonning to Section 03600, Grout
CURING: Sufficient tarps or plastic sheets shall be stored on the job to prevent

rain damage to the newly placed curb. Immediately after the free water has left
the concrete surface, the curb shall be coated with a uniform coat of white

-

membrane curing compound at the rate of one gallon per 200 square feet No
vehicle or foot travel shall be allowed on the _n ew curb for 96 hours.

END OF SECTION

001

02525-2

�I
I
I
I
I

SECTION 02528
CONCRETE SIDEWALKS

PART 1

GENERAL •

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
the construction of CONCREfE SIDEWALKS.

1.02

RELATED WORK

I
I
I

I
II

'

A.

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference with flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:
1.

2.

SECTION O1560 SECTION 03001 -

SPECIAL CONTROLS
CONCRETE

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

CONCRETE: Shall be air entrained 6 sack mix with a 28 day compressive
strength of 3,500 psi. Materials, mixing, placing and curing shall conform to
Section 03001, Concrete.

2.02

PREFORMED BITUMINOUS JOINT FILLERS:

PART3

EXECUTION

3.01

BASE PREPARATION: The sidewalk base shall consist of a minimum of four
inches of compacted sand or other materials equal to MDOT Granular Material
Class ill. In areas of existing granular subbase, the natural base may be used. In
areas of existing unstable base material, the Contractor shall excavate the unstable
material, as directed by the Engineer and place and compact sand or other material
equal to :MDOT Granular Material Class II. All tree roots 2-inches or more in
diameter which are cut in conjunction with the base preparation shall be painted
with Bartlett's Tree Paint, Tanglefoot Tree Paint, or equal.

3.02

FORMS: Shall be clean and straight, composed of wood or metal. The forms

Shall consist of a
bituminous mastic composition formed and encased between layers of felt,
conforming to ASTh1 D2475.

shall be staked to line and grade in a manner that will prevent deflection or
settlement Forms shall be clean and oiled before placing concrete. Removal
shall not take place in less than 12 hours after placement of concrete.
001

·

02528-1

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I

3.03

full depth of the sidewalk, at driveways, and where the new walk abuts existing
concrete structures. Contraction joints shall be formed every 5 feet or as
requested by the Owner. All joints shall be constructed at right angles to the
centerline of the sidewalk.

3.04

PLACING CONCRETE: The subgrade shall be thoroughly wetted and the
concrete deposited. thereon to the proper depth. Concrete shall be spaded along
the forms, compressed and struck off flush with the top of the forms. The surface
shall be floated with a steel float, edges and joints properly tooled.a nd then
finished with a wood float or brush as required to provide a non-slip surface.

3.05

CURING: Sufficient tarps or plastic sheets shall be stored on the job to prevent
rain damage to the newly placed sidewalk. Immediately after the free water has
left the concrete surface, the sidewalk shall be coated with a uniform coat of white
membrane curing compound at the rate of one gallon per 200 square feet No
vehicular or foot traffic shall be allowed on the new sidewalk for 96 hours after
pouring.

••,

'

JOINTS: 0.50-inch transverse expansion joint shall be placed every 50 feet the

'

1:

I

END OF SECTION

...

001

02528-2

�I
I

I
I

SECTION 02665
WATER MAINS

•

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by thls section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all pl211t, labor, equipment, and materials in conjunction with
the installation of WATER ~INS.

1.02

RELATED WORK

A.

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference with flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:
1.
2.
3.
4.

SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION

5.
6.

SECTION 02901 SECTION 02715 -

7.

SECTION 03001 -

01410
01560
02222
02223

-

SOILS COMPACTION MTI TESTING
SPECIAL CONTROLS
EXCAVATION FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS
BEDDING A:t--iTI BACKFILLING FOR UTILITY

SYSTEMS
RESTORATION M1D CLEAN-UP
CONCRETE UTILITY MANHOLES AND CATCH
BASINS
CONCRETE

1.03

SUB MITT ALS: Detailed material lists, specifications, and written certification,
for all materials furnished under thls section of the specification shall be submitted
to the Engineer for review.

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

MATERIALS: Shall be new and of the type as specified herein or the standard
of the governing agency, as noted on the plans.
·
A.

WATER MAIN PIPE
General Requirements:
a.

002

Material Selection: Unless specifically shown on the plans or
listed in the form of proposal to be a specific material, the
Contractor may elect to utilize any of the following materials
subject to specifications and size limitations outlined below.

02665-1

�I
I

I
I
I
I

2.

b.

Single Material Requirement: Unless otherwise approved by the
Engineer, a single material shall be used for all water main in the
contract If multiple pipe materials are permitted, the change in
• materials shall be accomplished at normal junctions such as valves
or fittings.

c.

Pipe Markings: All pipe delivered to the job site shall bear the
marks required by the ANSI/AWWA specification.

Ductile Iron (D.1.) : Shall conform to ANSI/AWWA C151/Al21.51 and
the following:
a.

Class and Size: Unless otherwise noted on the plans, pipe wall
thickness shall be a minimum of Class 52., Ductile iron may be
used for six inch (6") and larger diameter pipe.

b.

Exterior Coating: Bituminous, 1 mil thick.

c.

Lining:
Standard thickness cement-mortar confonning to
ANSI/AWWA C104/A21.4.

d.

Polyethylene Encasement: ANSI/AWWA Cl05/A21.5.

e.

Flanged Joints: ASA Oass 125.

f.

Mechanical Joints and Push-on Joints:
ANSI/AWWA
Clll/A21.ll, bolts and nuts shall be high strength corrosion
resistant alloy with hex head nuts.

g.

Fittings: Ductile iron or cast iron, cement-mortar lined, confonning
to ANSI/AWWA C110/A21.10.

h.

Electrical Continuity: Bronze wedges or continuity straps.

i
I
I
II
II
II
II

,.
"Ill
Ill
,

3.

002

Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC): Shall conform to ANSI/AWW A C900.
a.

Class and Size: SDR 18 wall thickness, six (6) inch through
twelve (12) inch diameter.

b.

Joints: Integral wall-thickened bell and spigot with elastomericgasket confonning to ASTM D3139.

c.

Fittings: Shall conform to paragraph 2.01.A.2.g. above.

02665-2

�I

I
I
I
I

B.

VALVES

1.

I
I
I

2.

002

General Requirements:
a.

Working Pressure: 150 psi minimum.

b.

Joints: Unless otherwise indicated on the plans or valve schedule,
mechanical joint conforming to ANSI/AWWA Cl 11/A21.1 l. End
flanges, if specified, shall be ANSI B 16.1 Class 125.

c.

Direction of Opening: Agency standard.

Resilient Seated Gate Valves: Shall conform to ANSI/AWWA C509 and
the following:
a.

Body Construction: ASTM A126 Class B, cast iron.

b.

Operator: Hex nut, unless otherwise indicated on the plans or the
valve schedule.

c.

Manufacturer. Kennedy Valve, Waterous or equal.

C.

VALVE BOXES: Cast iron, screw type, three (3) piece; cover shall be furnished
marked "Water". EJIW series 6860 or agency standard.

D.

VALVE EXTENSION STEMS: Where valves are used with valve boxes, the
depth to the top of the valve operating nut shall not be greater than 5½ feet.
Where the water main is buried at a depth where the normal valve operating nut
will be at a depth greater than 5½ feet, a valve extension stem with operating nut
shall be provided and mechanically attached to the valve to provide an operating
nut at the 5½ foot depth.

E.

HYDRANTS: Shall conform to ANSI/AWWA C503 and the following:

L

Type and Size: Break.away traffic flange; 5¼-inch main valve seat

2.

Connections: Two (2), 2½-inch hose nozzles and 1 pumper connection;
agency standard threads.

3.

Direction·_ of Opening: Agency standard.

4.

Manufacturer. EJIW Model 5-BR, or approved equal.

02665-3

�I
I
I

•
•
•
•
•

F.

SERVICE LEAD, CORPORATION STOP, CURB VALVE AND CURB BOX
1.

Service Lead Pipe: ASTM B88 type k annealed seamless copper water
tube qf the size indicated on the plans. Fittings shall be flared type.

2.

Corporation Stop: Mueller H-15000, Hays "Nuseal", or approved equal.
Corporation sizes exceeding the maximum for three (3) full threads shall
utilize an· appropriate service clamp, Mueller H-10526 through H-10537,
or approved equal.

3.

Curb Valves: Mueller H-15204, Oriseal, or approved equal.

4.

Curb Box: Mueller H-10350, or approved equal .

2.02

BEDDING :MATERIAL: Shall conform to section 02223, Bedding and
Backfilling for Utility Systems .

2.03

MAt\THOLES: Shall be precast concrete confonning to Section 02715, Concrete
Utility Manholes and Catch Basins.

PART3

EXECUTION

3.01

WATER MAIN INSTALLATION

002

A.

GEl\TERAL: Installation shall be in accordance with ANSI/AWWA C600 for
ductile iron pipe; ASTM D2774 for PVC pipe and the following:

B.

LA YING PIPE: Pipe shall be laid with the bell ends facing the direction of
laying, unless otherwise directed or allowed by the Engineer.

C.

LOCATION: As indicated on the plans. Maintain at least a ten feet separation
from any sewer, unless specifically indicated on the plans.

D.

GRADE AND ALIGNMENT: Provide cover of 6 feet, unless otherwise indicated
on the plans.

E.

WET TRENCH LAYING: When the trench contains water, open ends of the
pipe shall be closed by a watertight plug. 'This provision shall apply during the
noon hour as well as overnight

F.

PIPE BEDDING: Shall conform to Section 02223, Bedding and Backfilling for
Utility Systems.

G.

PIPE ENCASEMENT: Ductile iron pipe, bedded in an area of aggressive soil
such as peat, shall be encased in a polyethylene encasement

02665-4

�H.

ELECfRJCAL CON1Th11.JITY: Unless otherwise noted on the plans, electrical
continuity shall be provided for ductile iron pipe.

I.

LOCATING ,PROVISIONS: A suitable means for magnetically locating PVC
water main shall be provided and approved by the Engineer in writing prior to
construction.

J.

THRUST BLOCKS: Shall be made of Class B, poured-in-place concrete, placed
at all bends, dead ends, tees, reducers, hydrants and valves, as required.

1.

2.

Thrust Table: Shall be used for sized noted. For larger si~ the details
will be shown on the plans. Area in square feet of concrete thrusting
against undisturbed eanh shall be computed by dividing the total thrust by
the safe bearing load of the soil.

Thrust
Main Size

Tee or
Plug

90°
Bend

45°
Bend

4"
6"
8"
10"
12"
14"
16"
18"
20"

2,840
5,800
8,900
14,800
20,900
28,000
36,200

4,000
8,200
14,000
21,000
30,000
40,000
51,000

2,100
4,300
7,400
11,000
15,500
21,000
27,000
34,000
37,500

45,400

64,000

55,800

79,000

22½ 0
Bend

· Bend

1,100
2,300
3,900
5,800
8,200
11,000
14,200
17,800
21,800

600
1,100
2,000
2,900
4,100
5,500
7,100
8,900
11,000

11¼0

Safe Bearing Loads for Soils (Horizontal Thrust):
Safe Bearing Load
Lbs. per Sq. Ft
Muck, Peat, etc.
Soft Clay
Sand
Sand
Sand and Gravel cemented w/clay
Hard compacted clay

3.

002

0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000

Thrust Blocks in Unstable Soil Conditions: Thrust shall be resisted by
piling driven to solid foundations or by removal of unstable soil material
and replacement with ballast of sufficient stability to resist thrust 1brust

02665-5

�I
l

•
•
•

C.

INSTALLATION WITH CASING: In unstable soils, as determined by the Project
Manager, the combination of boring and jacking simultaneously shall be utilized
providing the cutting edge of the auger does not advance ahead of the casing.
Casing diam~ter shall not e~ceed the diameter of the service lead by more than
one inch. Casing pipe may be removed at the Contractor's option .

D.

BORING INSTALLATION:
agency/utility .

E.

CONl\TECTION TO EXISTING SERVICES: Connections to existing water
services with like material shall be made with standard couplings; connections of
dissimilar materials shall be made with appropriate couplings with Nylon dielectric
bushings.

HYDROSTATIC TESTING

3.05

A.

GENERAL:
Upon completion of installation of the water main and
appurtenances, the Contractor shall furnish all apparatus, materials, labor and
water required to perform the pressure tests in accordance with Section 4,
Hydrostatic Testing, ANSI/AWW A C600 and the following:

B.

PRE-TEST PROCEDURES: . The Contractor shall open all valves, including
hydrant auxiliary valves, and then completely fill the line with water with a
special emphasis upon removing all air from the pipe, valves or hydrants. If
necessary, the Contractor shall install additional corporation stops at high points
to allow the air to be expelled.

C.

PRELIMINARY. TEST: A preliminary pressure test by the Contractor shall be
accomplished. Any leaks encountered shall be corrected and the test shall be
rerun until results_are satisfactory.

D.

FINAL PRESSURE AND LEAKAGE TEST: Shall conform to ANSI/AWWA
C600, Hydrostatic Testing, in the presence of the Engineer, who shall receive 24
hours notice prior to testing. If it is necessary for the Engineer to observe more
than one test on any section of mainline, the Contractor shall be liable for the
additional cost involved for observation of subsequent tests.

E.

LEAK REPAIR: The Contractor shall provide all labor and materials, etc., as
required to repair any leaks, or otherwise required to meet these tests; all leaks
shall be repaired, _regardless of the amount of leakage. Water damage resulting
from flushing or testing proc¢ures shall be the responsibility of the Contractor.

3.06

DISU\1FECTION

A.

002

Shall conform to the requirement of the local

GENERAL: Procedures shall conform to ANSI/AWWA C651, and the following:

02665-7

�B.

PRELTh1INARY FLUSHING: After the pressure test and before disinfection, the
Contractor shall flush out the new pipe lines until the water runs clear. Each
valved section of the newly laid pipe shall be flushed separately with potable
water from tfue public supply.

C.

DISINFECITON: The Contractor shall disinfect the new mains in increments
designated by the Engineer. Samples shall be ta.ken from corporation stops only.
If mains dead end at hydrants, with no adjacent valve, the Contractor shall install
an additional corporation stop for sampling.

D.

BACTERIOLOGICAL WATER SAMPLES: Shall be collected by the Contractor,
or his duly authorized representative, in the presence of the Engineer, in
confonnance with ANSI/AWWA C651. Two successive safe tests ta.ken 24 hours
apart are required; analysis shall be made by a State approved laboratory.

E.

FAILING TESTS: In the event of an unsafe test, the test shall be repeated as
described above . . The Contractor shall be responsible for the tests and shall be
liable for any costs when more than one treatment or set of tests is necessary.

END OF SECTION

002

02665-8

�I
I
I

•
•
•

SECTION 02715
CONCRETE UTILITY l\1ANlIOLES AND CATCH BASINS

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
CONCRETE UTILITY MAi'\tiOLES M1D CATCH BASINS.

1.02

RELATED WORK
A.

REQUIREMENTS: All concrete utility manholes, including catch basins and
valve vaults, shall be installed in accordance with the details indicated on the
drawings and these specifications.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:
1.

2.
3.
4.

5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

SECTION 01410 SECTION 01560 SECTION 02222 SECTION 02223 SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION

02665
02722
02732
02901
03001
03600

-

SOILS COMPACTION M1D TESTING
SPECIAL CONrROLS
EXCAVATION FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS
BEDDIN'G AND BACKFILLING FOR UTILITY
SYSTEMS
WATER MAINS
STORM SEWERS
SANITARY SEWER
RESTORATION AND CLEAN-UP
CONCRETE
GROUT

1.03

Detailed material lists and specifications for all materials
furnished under this section of the specification shall be submitted to the Engineer
for approval. Submittals shall be in accordance with Section 2.12 of the
GENERAL CONDffiONS. .

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

PRECAST SECTIONS: Precast sections shall conform to ASTM C478. Sewer
pipe opening connections to precast concrete manholes shall conform to the
following specifications:

SUBMITf ALS:

A.

001

SANITARY SEWERS: Manhole pipe connections shall be furnished with an
integrally cast seal system, equal to "A-Lok", "Kor-N-Seal", "Lock Joint Flexible
Manhole Sleeves", or equal. Sanitary manholes shall have integral concrete
manhole bases. Manhole sections joints shall be of the O-ring rubber joint type
or preformed type of butyl sealant material. All pipe openings shall be case in the
02715-1

�I

I
I

B.

•-

STORM SEWER:Manhole pipe connections shall be with a non-shrink grout
Manhole section joints shall be of the mastic joint type or butyl rubber sealant type
unless otherwise shown on the drawings.

C.

VALVE MANHOLES M1D OTIIBR STRUCI1JRES: Details and joints shall
conform to the drawings.

•
•
•
•

precast section or cored in the finished wall. Broken and patched connections will
not be accepted.

MA1"-UIOLE ADJUSTING BRICK:

2.02

Shall be concrete units conforming to

ASTM C55.

2.03

MAI\TJIOLE ADJUSTING RING: Shall be standard precast reinforced concrete
rings ·with a minimum of rn·o inch height and a maximum of 6 inch height

2.04

MAmIOLE STEPS: Shall be furnished in all manholes unless otherwise noted
on the plans, and shall be Co-Polymer Polypropylene Plastic manhole steps
reinforced with 3/8" deformed_reinforced bar. Manhole steps shall be of the pressfit type with serrated type treat and lugs. Steps shall not be cast in wall. Steps
shall be spaced at sixteen inches on center in a true vertical alignment unless
shown otherwise on the drawings.

2.05

FRAMES AND COVERS: The cast iron frames and covers shall conform to the
castings noted on the plans or in the specifications. Cover lettering shall be
included when specified. It is the intention of this specification to provide frames
and covers considered standard in the Owner's system.

2.06

GROUT: Shall conform to Section 03600, Grout

2.07

CONCRETE: Shall conform to Section 03001, Concrete.

PART3

EXECUTION

3.01

IN'STALLATIO N: Utility manholes shall be constructed of precast concrete
sections including risers, adjusting rings and precast tops of eccentric cone or flat
slab type, as indicated on the drawings.

A.

UTILITY MAI\THOLE AND CATCH BASINS
1.

Precast Concrete: Precast bottoms or bases shall be set on uniform
bedding of 8 inches of compacted sand or existing granular material as
approved by the Engineer. When water is encountered in the trench, bases
shall be set on a minimum of 12 inches of stone fill conforming to MDOT

6A.

001

02715-2

�I
2.

I
I

'•
•
•..

Integral Base: The Contractor, at his option, may use integral cast base
and riser sections confonning to ASlM C478, except that integral bases
shall be used on all sanitary sewer manholes.

B.

PRECAST CONCRETE RISERS: Shall be set plumb and manhole steps shall be
aligned to forin a continuous ladder. Joints between manhole sections shall utilize
rubber O-rings or preformed butyl rubber sealant material for sanitary sewer
manholes and shall utilize mastic or preformed butyl rubber sealant for storm
manholes, catch basins and valve vaults unless otherwise shown on the drawings .

C.

CASTINGS: Shall be installed as specified below:

E.

1.

Sanitary Sewer Manholes and Valve Vaults: Castings shall be set on
precast concrete adjusting rings with a minimum adjustment of 4 inches
and a maximum of 12 inches. Casting and rings shall be set in grout
unless otherwise called for on the drawings.

2.

Storm Sewer Manholes and Catch Basins: Castings shall be set on precast
concrete adjusting rings with a minimwn adjustment of 4 inches and a
maximum of 12 inches or, if allowed on the drawings, adjusting brick may
be used.

3.

Casting Elevations: Where castings are to be flush with permanent
pavements, the Contractor shall adjust the frame to the proper grade.
Where castings are on flat slab tops in non-paved areas, they shall be set
flush with finish earth grade unless shown otherwise.

4.

Finish: The interior and exterior surface of adjustment rings or bricks shall
be tooled to give a smooth finish coat of grout

DROP PIPES: Shall be constructed at sanitary manholes wherever the difference

in elevation between any inlet and outlet sewer is more than two vertical feet or
as noted in the plans. All drop pipes shall be encased in concrete and shall
conform to the drawing details. All drop pipes shall be exterior unless othernise
noted on the plans.

F.

3.02

FLOW CHMTNELS: Shall be constructed in manhole bottoms with mechanically
mixed concrete. Flow channel depth shall be a minimum of ½ the pipe diameter
and concrete thickness shall be a minimum of 4 inches measured from the top of
the base to the bottom of the flow channel. Where the grade of sewer is
continuous through the manhole, the Contractor may lay the pipe through the
manhole, fill around the pipe with concrete and carefully break out or cut out the
top of the sewer pipe.

TESTING: All sanitary sewer manholes shall be tested in conformance with
Section 02732, Sanitary Sew~rs. The Contractor shall repair any leaks, flaws or
irregularities in any manholes or catch basins.

El\TD OF SECTION
001

02715-3

�I

I
I
I
I

•
•

SECTION 02717
SEWAGE FORCE MAINS

PART 1

GENERAL '

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
SEWAGE FORCE MAINS.

1.02

RELATED WORK: All items herein specified shall be adjusted to be
compatible with the standard units used by the Owner in his present system. The
items shall be of a quality level specified herein, and may be modified as called
for herein or on the plans .

~

A.

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference with flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:
1.

4.

SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION

5.

SECTION 02715 -

6.

SECTION 02901 SECTION 03001 -

2.
3.

7.

01410
01560
02222
02223

-

SOILS COMPACTION AND TESTING
SPECIAL CONTROLS
EXCAVATION FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS
BEDDING Ai-...1D BACK.FILLING FOR UTILITY
SYSTEMS
CONCRETE UTILITY MANHOLES AND CATCH
BASINS
RESTORATION Mm CLEAN-UP
CONCRETE

1.03

SUB MITT ALS:

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

PIPES AA'D JOINTS: Shall be of the type as listed herein meeting the
specifications_noted. Unless specifically shown on the plans or listed in the form
of proposal to be a specific material, the Contractor may elect to utilize any of the
following materials subject to specifications and size limitations herein specified.
Unless specifically approved by the Engineer, a single material shall be used for
the total of each size main in the Contract All pipe delivered to the job site shall
bear the marks required by the ANSI/AWWA specification.

001

Detailed material lists and specifications for all materials
furnished under this section of the specification shall be submitted to the Engineer
for review. Submittals shall be in accordance with Section 2.12 of the GENERAL
CONDIDONS.

02717-1

�f
f
f

A.

•
•
•
B.

C.

DUCTILE IRON (D.I.): Shall conform to ANSI/AWWA C151/A21.51 unless
otherwise noted on the plans. Pipe wall thickness shall be a minimum of Class 52.
Pipe shall be standard thickness cement-mortar per ANSI/AWWA C104/A21.4,
with the standprd exterior bituminous coating. Ductile iron may be used for four
inch (4") and larger diameter pipe.
1.

Flanged Joints: Shall conform to ASA Class 125.

2.

Mechanical Joints and Push-On Joints: Shall conform to AN.SI/A WW A
Cl l l/A21.11. Bolts and nuts shall be of high strength corrosion resistant
alloy with hex head nuts .

3.

Fittings and Specials: Shall conform to ANSI/AWWA Cll0/A21.10 and
may be either ductile or cast iron and shall be standard thickness cementmortar lined per ANSI/AWWA Cl04/A21.4.

4. .

Polyethylene Encasement: Shall conform to ANSI/AWW A C105/A21.5.

POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC): Shall conform to ANSI/AWWA C900,
pressure class 150. Minimum pipe wall thickness shall be DR 18. All pipe shall
have a "home" mark. PVC may be used for four inch (4") through twelve inch
(12") diameter pipe.
1.

Joints: Shall be of the elastomeric gasket, push-on type confonning to
ASTM D3139.

2.

Fittings and Specials: Shall conform to AN.SI/AWWA C110/A21.10 for
ductile iron, mechanical joint fittings with suitable adapters or gaskets as
required by the pipe manufacturer. Fittings and specials shall be standard
thickness cemenf-mortar lined per ANSI/AWW A Cl04/A21.4.

POLYETI-IYLENE (PE) PIPE AND FITTINGS: Shall be manufactured from a
high density, high molecular weight polyethylene base resin confonning to ASTM
D 1248 Type III, Class C, Category 5, Grade P34. Polyethylene may be used for
one inch (1 ") and larger diameter pipe.
1.

Minimum Cell Classification Values: As referenced to ASTM D-3350
shall be:
a.

b.

2.

001

,

335433C: With a minimum pipe wall thickness of SDR 9.3, rated
at not less than 150 psL ·
335434C: With a minimum pipe wall thickness of SDR 11.0, rated
at not less than 150 psL

Joints: Shall be made by thermal butt-fusion conforming to ASTM
D-2657. All joints shall be made in accordance with the procedures and

02717-2

�joining equipment recommended by the pipe manufacturer and approved
by the Engineer.
3.

D.

2.02

LOCATING PROVISIONS: A suitable means for magnetically locating PVC or
PE forcemain shall be installed with the PVC or PE forcemain and shall be
approved by the Engineer in writing prior to construction.
BEDDING: Shall conform to Section 02223, Bedding and Backfilling for Utility
Systems.

A.

DUCTILE IRON (D.L): Shall be Type 1 Bedding for Rigid Pipe unless otherwise
specified on the plans.

B.

POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) AND POLYETIIYLENE (PE): Shall conform
to Section 02223, paragraph 3.05.B, F1exible Pipe Bedding.

2.03

001

Joint ,and Equipment Testing: Prior to the installation of the pipe, a
specimen of a butt-fusion pipe joint, made with the joining equipment to
be used on the project, shall be submitted to an independent testing
laboratory selected by the Engineer and tested in conformance with AS1M
D638, or certified standard data sheets indicating acceptable test results
have been made on similar joints.

VALVES

A.

GATE VALVES: Shall be iron body, fully bronze mounted, double disc, parallel
seat type, opening confonning to ASTM B132 (Grade Ill cast bronze) non-rising
stem and nut, unless otherwise called for, and confonning to ANSI/A WW A C500,
Traverse City Iron Works ([CIW), Ea.st Jordan Iron Works (EJIW), or equal.
Valves shall be supplied with mechanical joint ends unless otherwise specified on
the plans or in the specifications. The design working pressure shall be a
minimum of 150 psi unless otherwise noted on the plans.

B.

VALVE BOXES: Shall be cast iron, screw type, two piece, consisting of the base
and the top section. The length shall be adjusted by means of threads cast into the
top and base sections. A cover shall be furnished. The base shall be 5 1/4-inch and
have a range of extension of 51-82 inches. The valve boxes shall be TCI\V A297, Clow F-2454, or equal.

C.

AIR RELEASE VALYES: Shall be designed to operate under pressure and open
to vent entrapped air and gases from the sewage force main. After entrapped air ·
and gases are vented, the valve shall close to prevent clogging of the valve
mechanism. The body and cove.r shall be cast iron with all internal parts of
stainless steel or other acceptable material to prevent corrosion. The valve shall
be complete with acce4ssories necessary for installation including an inlet shut-off
valve, 1" clean out valve, and an ½" shut-off valve for back flushing with quick
disconnect couplings and back flushing hose. The inlet shall be 2" unless
otherwise noted on the plans. Valves shall be rated for not less than 150 psi
02717-3

�working pressure and be APCO, Val-Matic Corporation, or equal, specifically
designed for use on sewage forcemains.

PART3

EXECUTION

3.01

HANDLING OF PIPE: Proper and suitable tools and appliances shall be used
for the safe and careful handling, conveying and laying of the pipe. Care shall be
taken to prevent the coating of pipe from being damaged. Dropping mat'!rial
directly from a truck or platform will not be permitted. All pipes and castings
shall be carefully examined for defects. If any materials are found to be defective,
they shall be removed from the site.

A.

CLEANING PIPE AND Fl I I INGS: All lumps, blisters and excess coal tar or
other material shall be removed from the bell and spigot end of each pipe and
fitting. The outside of the spigot and the inside of the bell shall be brushed and
wiped clean, dry and free from oil or grease prior to laying. The inside of the pie
shall be brushed in order to remove all dirt and debris. Any damage to exterior
pipe coating shall be repaired with an approved coating before the pipe is laid.

B.

LAYING PIPE: Pipe shall be laid with the spigot ends facing the direction of
flow. Under no circumstances shall pipe be dropped directly into the trench.
Precautions shall be taken to prevent foreign material from entering the pipe while
it is being placect After placing a length of pipe in the trench, the spigot end shall
be centered in the bell, and the pipe forced home to correct line and grade. At all
times, the open ends of the pipe shall be covered to prevent foreign matter from
entering. If cuts of full lengths of pipe are required, the cut end shall be trimmed,
beveled or otherwise prepared for jointing as recommended by the pipe
manufacturer. Only lubricants recommended by the pipe manufacturer shall be
used as recommended in joint assembly.

3.02

001

GRADE AND ALIGl'\1MENT: All forcemains shall be installed to provide an
overall cover of 6 feet, unless otherwise indicated. on the drawings. The location
of the forcemain is indicated on the drawings. Special care shall be taken to avoid
any air pockets within the forcemain. If high points are constructed in the
forcemain other than those shown on the plans or authorized by the Engineer, the
Contractor shall install an air release valve at each high point at no additional cost
by the Owner.

A.

PIPE DEFLECTION: Where curved lines, laid without fittings, are shown on the
plans, or are necessary to avoid obstructions, the pipe may be deflected
horizontally or vertically at each joint within the published recommended limits
recommended by the pipe manufacturer. Deflections in excess of the allowable
deflection shall be made by using standard fittings.

B.

VIET 1RENCH LA YING: When the trench contains water, the open ends of pipe
shall be closed by a watertight plug. This provision shall apply during the noon

02717-4

�•
•
•

hour as well as overnight If water is in the trench, the seal shall remain in place
until the trench is pumped completely dry.

3.03

PIPE BEDDING: Shall conform to Section 02223, Bedding and Backfill for
Utility Systems. Ductile iron· pipe, bedded in an area of aggressive soil such as
peat, shall be encased in a polyethylene encasement

3.04

THRUST BLOCK: Shall be made of Class B, poured-in-place concrete, and
placed at all bends noted below. Area in square feet of concrete thrusting against
undisturbed earth shall be computed by dividing the total thrust by the safe bearing
load of the soil. Thrust and safe bearing loads for soils are shown in the following
tables:
A.

THRUST TABLE: Shall be used for sizes noted. For larger sizes, the details will
be shown on the plans.
Thrust
Main Size

Bend

45°
Bend

22½ 0
Bend

4,000
8,200
14,000
21,000
30,000
4(),000
51,000
64,000
79,ooq

2,100
4,300
7,400
· 11,000
· 15,500
21,000
27,000
34,000
37,500

1,100
2,300

900

11¼0
Bend

·'
4"
6''
8"

10''
12"
14"
16"
18"
20"
B.

3,900
5,800
8,200

11,000
14,200
17,800
21,000

600
1,100
2,000
2,900
4,100
5,500
7,100

8,900
11,000

SAFE BEARING LOADS FOR SOILS (HORIZONTAL lBRUST):
Safe Bearing Load

Lbs. per Sq. Ft
Muck, Peat, etc.
Soft Clay
Sand
Sand and Gravel
Sand and Gravel cemented w/clay
Hard compacted clay

C.

001

0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
5,000

THRUST BLOCKS IN PEAT: In muck or peat, all thrust shall be resisted by
piling.driven to solid foundations or by removal of muck or peat and replacement
with ballast of sufficient stability to resist thrusts. In all cases, thrust block size
and method of thrusting must be approved by the Engineer before the thrust block
is poured.

02717-5

�1.

D.

Special 111.rust Containment: Using joint ties and containing thrust within
the pipe will be considered by the Engineer upon a definite proposal of
methods submitted by the Contractor. Only methods retaining the freedom
of joints to bend will be considere.d.

GENERAL: A detail of standard thrust blocks is included at the back of this
specification section showing typical blocks for a 2,000 psf safe bearing capacity.
If the soil capacity is different than 2,000 psf, the bearing area will be varied
accordingly, but the general arrangement shall be as shown.

3.05

AIR RELEASE AATI CLEANOUT STRUCTURES: The Contractor shall
install air release and cleanout structures as indicated on the drawings. Structures
shall conform to Section 02715, Concrete Utility Manholes and Catch Basins.

3.06

RESTORATION AATJ) CLEAN-UP:
Restoration and ~lean-up.

3.07

PRESSURE Al\1D LEAKAGE TESTING: The Contractor shall furnish all
apparatus and water required to perform the pressure and leakage tests, and shall
outline this equipment to the Engineer for.his approval prior to any testing.
A.

PRE-TEST PROCEDURES: The Contractor shall provide any temporary plugs
and blocking as required for the test, and then completely fill the line with water
with a special emphasis upon removing all air from the pipe.

B.

PRELIM:INARY TEST: Lines shall be given a preliminary pressure test by the
Contractor to ascertain if there are any major lea.ks. After any leaks are corrected,
the test shall be rerun until results are satisfactory.

C.

FINAL PRESSURE AND LEAKAGE TEST: Shall conform to ANSI/AWWA
C600 - Hydrostatic Testing, in the presence of the Engineer, who shall receive 24
hours notice prior to testing. The test pressure shall be at least 150 psi measured
at the highest point in the line. If it is necessary for the Engineer to observe more
than one test, the Contr~ctor shall be liable for the additional cost involved for
observation of subsequent tests.

D.

GENERAL: The Contractor shall provi_de all labor and materials, etc., as required
to repair any lea.ks, or otherwise required to meet these tests. All visible leaks
shall be repaired, regardless of the amount of leakage. Any excavation or
construction required shall be done as previously required herein.

1.

Water: For filling and testing will be supplied by the Contractor.

END OF SECTION

001

Shall conform to Section 02901,

02717-6

�ELBOWS
P I PE DIA .
INCHES

4
6

8
10
12
14
16
18
20

ELBONS

'A'

BEAR ING AREA-SOUARE FEET

FEET

90°

.75
.75
.75
.75
.75
.75
.75
.75
.75

2.0
4. I
7.0
10.5
14.8
19. 8
25. 6
32.2
39.4

45°

22-112°

I 1-1 ;4c

0.6
I. 2
2.0
2.9
4. I
5.5

0.3
0.6
I .0
I .5
2 .0
2.7
3.5

I. I

2.2
3,7
5.5
7.8
10.4
13.5
16 .9
18.8

7. I

8.9
10.9

4.4

5.5

ALL BLOCKS -SKAL L BE
PLACED AGAINST
·
iNDISTURBED

EARTH

i:::;=~

TEES, PLUGS 8. HYOOANTS

NOMINAL PIPE DIA.

PIPE DIA.
INCHES

4
6
8

10
12
14

16
18
20

a

'A'
FEET

BEAqlNG AREA
SQU!I.RE FEET

.75
.75
. 75
.75
. 75
.75
.75
.75
.75

JOINTS SHALL BE KEPT CLEAR OF CONCRE1E.

I_

B:)LTS, FITTINGS

2.

A BEARING CAPACITY OF 2&lt;:::IXjlf- PER FOOT WAS \£ED IN DE1ERMINING
THE Ml NIMUM I BEARING AREAS' IN THE ABO/E TABl..£S.
THE CROSS SECTION OF THE lliRUST BLOCKS SHALL E£ APPROXIMATELY

3.

*

SQUARE.
THIS DIMENSION SHALL BE INCREASED AS REQUIRED TO PROVIDE
LARGER BEARING AREAS.

THRUST

BLOCK
NO

SCALE

02717-7

DETAIL

I

.5

2.9

4.9

7.4
10.5
14.0
18. I
22. 7
27_ 8

�SECTION 02722
STORM SEWERS

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
the installation of STORM SEWERS.

1.02

RELATED 'WORK

A.

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference with flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:
1.

2.
3.
4.

SECTION
SECTION
SECTION
SECTION

5.

SECTION 02715 -

6.

SECTION 02901 SECTION 03001 SECTION 03600 -

7.
8.

01410
01560
02222
02223

-

SOILS COMPACTION AND TESTING
SPECIAL CONTROLS
EXCAVATION FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS
BEDDING AND BACKFILLING FOR UTILITY
SYSTEMS
CONCRETE UTILITY MM1HOLES AND CATCH
BASINS
RESTORATION Al\1D CLEAN-UP
CONCRETE
GROUT

1.03

SUBMIITALS: Detailed material lists and specifications for all materials
furnished under this section of the specification shall be submitted to the Engineer
for review. Submitta.ls shall be in accordance with Section 2.12 of the GENERAL
CONDIDONS.

1.04

CERTIF1CATION OF MATERIALS: When requeste.d, the Contractor shall
furnish certification that all materials meet the requirements set forth in the plans
and specifications. Source of the certification shall be determine.d by the Engineer.

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

SEWER PIPES AND JOINTS: Shall be new unless noted on the plans and shall
be stored and handled as recommended by the manufacturer. The size, type, and
class shall be as shown on the plans or noted in the specifications. All pipe shall
be marked with the class and date of manufacture by the manufacturer.

001

02722-1

�A.

NON-REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (CSP): Shall conform to ASTh1 C14,
Class 3 unless othen,,rise noted on the plans with acceptance on the basis of plant
load bearing tests, material tests, and inspection of manufactured pipe for visual
defects and imperfections.

B.

REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP):Shall conform to ASTM C76 with
acceptance on the basis of plant load bearing tests, material tests, and inspection
of manufactured pipe for visual defects and imperfections.

C.

CORRUGATED PIPE:
specified herein.

1.

Corrugated Metal Pipe (C:MP): Shall be standard 2-2/3" x 1/2" pipe unless
otherwise specified on the plans. The pipe shall conform to AASHTO M36 galvanized CMP. All buried pipe shall have a suitable bituminous
coating.

2.

Corrugated Polyethylene Pipe: Shall conform to AASHTO M-294. Joints
shall be made using couplings which are corrugated to match the pipe
corrugations and shall be of a width of not less than one-half the nominal
pipe diameter. Corrugated polyethylene pipe shall be ADS N-12, or equal.

D.

END SECTIONS: Shall be suitable design for the pipe and adjoining grades to
provide a smooth transition from the pipe to the rectangular stream cross-section.
The section shall be of material at least as heavy as the pipe, shall be reinforced
on all edges, and have a toe plate. End sections shall be manufactured and
furnished by the pipe supplier.

E.

JOINTS: Shall conform to one of the following specifications:

F.

001

Shall be either corrugated metal or polyethylene as

1.

Rubber "O" Ring: Shall be "Tylox", "Ring-Tite", or equal.

2.

Bituminous Mastic Joints: Shall be made when the joint surfaces are clean
and dry, using DeWitt #10, "Sewerti.te" by Philip Carey Company, or
equal. Cold weather joint compound may be used only with approval of
the Engineer. All excess material shall be removed from the inside of the
pipe.

3.

Butyl Ru.bber Sealant: May be used in lieu of rubber "O" ring or
bituminous mastic joints. Butyl rubber sealant shall be "RUB 'R-NEC
LTh1" by K. T. Snyder Company, or equal.

4.

Band Couplings: Bolted corrugated metal couplings shall be used at all
connections of corrugated metal pipe.

LUBRICANTS: For the making of pipe joints shall strictly conform to the
recommendations of the pipe manufacturer.

02722-2

�G.

GROUT FOR POlNTING PIPE JOINTS: Shall conform to Section 03600, Grout.

H.

UNDERDRAINS: Shall be perforated high density polyethylene corrugated tubing
wrapped in fil ter confonning to AASHTO M-252 requirements. The filter \Vrap
shall conform to MOOT requirements for geotextiles.

2.02

MA1''HOLES AND CATCH BASINS: Shall be precast concrete confonning to
Section 02715, Concrete Utility Manholes and Catch Basins.

2.03

BEDDING AA1D BACKFILL J\fATERIALS: Shall conform to Section 02223,
Bedding and Backfilling for Utility Systems.

A.

CONCRETE PIPE BEDDING: Shall be Type 1.

B.

CORRUGATED PIPE BEDDING: Shall conform to flexible pipe bedding.

PART3

EXECUTION

3.01

GENERAL: Handling, storage, installation, and the making of joints shall strictly
follow the manufacturers' recommendations. Rubber materials affected by
ultraviolet rays shall be protected from direct sunlight

3.02

GRADE M1D ALIGNMENT: All sewer shall be laid utilizing an "in-line" laser
for vertical and horizontal controL Vertical and horizontal alignment of the invert
shall, at any point, be within ±0.04 feet (½-inch) of plan elevation and line.

LAYING OF SEWER: Each pipe shall be inspected for possible defects before
being placed in the trench. Joint surfaces shall be free of earth or frozen matter.
All pipe shall be laid from the low end of the sewer upgrade with bell ends

3.03

upgrade to line and grade as called for on the plans and each pipe as laid shall be
checked by the Contractor. The use of brick, lumps of clay, wood, etc., to bring
the pipe to grade will not be permitted.

3.04

A.

JOINTS:
Shall be made in strict accordance with the manufacturers'
recommendations utilizing the recommended lubricant \Vood blocks or other
approved materials shall be used to protect the pipe ends from pry bars, chains,
etc. Pipe shall be pushed closed to the "home" position and if joints do not remain
tightly closed the pipes shall be replaced.

B.

FINAL LINE AND GRADE: After the pipe is laid, care in backfilling and other
operations shall be taken so as not to disturb its line, grade, or joint. Misalignment
shall be cause fo~ rejection of the sewer.

PIPE BEDDING AATJ&gt; BACKFILL: Shall conform to Section 02223, Bedding
and Backfill for Utility Systems.

001

02722-3

�3.05

POINTING: Concrete pipe joints on sewers 30 inches in diameter and larger
shall be pointed up with grout on the inside after backfilling is complete.

3.06

CONNECTIONS TO LIVE SEWERS: When connections are made with sewers
carrying storm water, special care must be taken that no part of the work is built
underwater, a flume or darn must be installed and pumping maintained if necessary
and the new work kept dry until completed and any concrete or grout has set up.

3.07

REMOVAL OF UN SUITABLE MATERIAL: Whenever any pipe section,
fitting or appurtenance is found to be unsuitable for installation due to
specification non-confonnance, poor workmanship, damage, or any other reason,
it shall be removed from the construction site during the working day by the
Contractor. Any material not so removed shall be painted or otherwise marked by
the Engineer to prevent its subsequent use.

3.08

RESTORATION AND CLEAN-UP:
Restoration and Clean-up.

3.09

TV INSPECTION: The Owner or his representative shall have the option of
perfonning a TV inspection of any section of sewer for signs of structural damage,
misalignment or improper joints. The costs of the inspection shall be paid by the
Owner unless the inspection reveals faulty construction or materials wherein the
costs shall be paid by the Contractor.

3.10

CORRECTION OF DEFECTIVE WORK: Whenever any inspection indicates
defective material or installation, the Contractor shall repair the section to the
satisfaction of the Engineer at no cost to the Owner. Any pipe or fitting having
structural damage shall require the removal and replacement of the damaged
section.

END OF SECTION

001

02722-4

Shall conform to Section 02901,

�•

SECTION 02732
SANITARY SE\VER

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
the installation of SANITARY SEWERS.

1.02

RELATED WORK

A.

REQUIREMENTS: All work shall be carried on in a neat and satisfactory manner
and interference with flow of traffic shall be kept to a minimum.

B.

RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:

2.
3.
4.

SECTION 01410
SECTION 01560
SECTION 02222
SECTION 02223

5.

SECTION 02715 -

6.

SECTION 02901 SECTION 03600 -

1.

7.

-

SOILS COMPACTION AND TESTING
SPECIAL CONTROLS
EXCAVATION FOR UTILITY SYSTEMS
BEDDING AND BACKFILLING FOR UTILITY
SYSTEMS
CONCRETE UTILITY MANHOLES AND CATCH
BASINS
RESTORATION AND CLEAN-UP
GROUT

1.03

SUBMfITALS: Detailed material lists and specifications for all materials
furnished under this section of the specification shall be submitted to the Engineer
for review. Submittals shall be in accordance with Section 2.12 of the GENERAL
CONDillONS.

1.04

CERTIFICATION OF MATERIALS: When requested, the Contractor shall
furnish certification that all materials meet the requirements set forth in the plans
and specifications. Source of the certification shall be detennined by the Engineer.

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

PIPES AND JOINTS:
All materials shall be new.
Manufacturers'
recommendations for storage, handling, and installation shall be strictly adhered
to. Materials shall be of the type as listed herein meeting the specifications noted.
Unless specifically shown on the plans and/or listed in the form of proposal to be
a specific materials, the Contractor may elect to utilize any of the following
materials subject to specifications and size limitations herein except that sewer
pipe materials may be changed only at manholes.

001

02732-1

�II
II

A.

B.

C.

001

PIPE
1.

Ductile Iron (D.1.): Shall be per ANSI/A WWA C151/A21.51. Pipe wall
thickr1ess will vary v.rith depth of cover and shall conform to Section
02223, Bedding and Backfilling for Utility Systems. Pipe shall be standard
thickness cement-mortar lined per ANSI/AWWA Cl 04/A21.4. Pipe joints
shall be mechanical joints or push-on joints confonning to ANSI/AWWA
Cll 1/A21.11. Ductile iron may be used for six inch (6") and larger
diameter pipe.

2.

Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP): Shall conform to ASTM C76. Pipe
class will vary v.rith depth of cover and type of bedding and shall conform
to Section 02223, Bedding and Backfilling for Utility Systems. Pipe joints
shall conform to ASTh1 C443 for rubber gasket joints. RCP may be used
for eighteen inch (18") or larger diameter pipe.

3.

Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC): Shall conform to ASTh1 D3033 or ASTh1
D3034. :Minimum pipe wall thickness shall be SDR-35. All pipe shall
have a "home" mark. Joints shall be of the elastomeric gasket push-on
type conforming to ASTM D3212. PVC may be used for six inch (6")
through fifteen inch (15") diameter pipe.

Fl I l lNGS: All piping connections and pipe size and/or direction changes shall
be made v.rith standard manufactured fittings conforming to the following:
1.

Ductile Iron Fittings: Shall be standard manufactured fittings of ductile
iron or cast iron conforming to ANSI/AWWA Cl 10/A21.10 for mechanical
joints and push-on joints. Fittings shall be cement-mortar lined per
ANSI/AWWA Cl04/A21.4 and shall have the standard exterior bituminous
coating. Service lateral fittings shall be tees. Plugs shall be iron or plastic
suitable for air testing.

2.

Reinforced Concrete Pipe Fittings: Service lateral connections shall be
made using standard manufactured components. Holes in the pipe barrel
shall be cored. The connection shall be made utilizing a system of 300
series stainless steel bands and an elastomeric molded boot confonning to
ASTh1 C443. Epoxy coated aluminum bands may be used in lieu of
stainless steel upon written approval of the Engineer.

3.

Polyvinyl Chloride Fittings: Shall be full fittings conforming to ASTh1
D3033 or ASTM D3034 for pipe wall thickness of SDR-35. Joints shall
conform to ASTM D3212. Service lateral connections shall be made with
standard wye fittings. Tees, tee-wyes, or saddles shall not be used.

CONNECTIONS OF DISSTh1ILAR PIPE MATERIALS: Shall not be made using
Donuts, oversize gaskets, etc. Connections shall be made utilizing one of the
following methods:

02732-2

�~

•
•
•
•
•

1.

Standard Adapters: Shall be a manufacturer's standard adapter with joints
confomm:ig to the above specifications .

2.

Couplings: Shall be an elastomeric coupling complete with 300 series
stainless steel tension bands confonning to ASTM C425. Couplings shall
be Clow Band-Seal Couplings, Fernco Flexible Couplings, or equal.

D.

CHANGES IN PIPE SIZES: Shall be made using standard smooth flow increasers
or reducers.

E.

LUBRICANTS: All lubricants for the making of pipe joints shall strictly conform
to the recommendations of the pipe manufacturer.

F.

GROUT FOR POINTING PIPE JOINTS: Shall conform to Section 03600, Grout

G.

POLYETIIYLENE ENCASEMENT:
ANSI/AWWA C105/A21.5.

For ductile iron pipe shall conform to

2.02

SANITARY SEWER MAAl-IOLES: Shall be precast concrete conforming to
Section 02715, Concrete_Utility Manholes and Catch Basins. Joints between the
pipe and the manhole shall be as specified therein.

2.03

CHEMICAL GROUT: For sealing minor joint leaks shall be an EPA approved

type.
2.04

MARKING: All pipe, fittings and appurtenant items furnished to the job site
shall be marked in accordance with the applicable specification. Any unmarked
materials are subject to rejection by the Engineer.

2.05

BEDDING A1\1D BACKFILL MATERIALS: Shall conform to Section 02223,
Bedding and Backfilling for Utility Systems as applicable to sanitary sewers where
in pipe class and bedding requirements are given for various depths of cover.

PART 3 ·

EXECUTION

3.01

GENERAL: Handling, storage, installation, and the making of joints shall strictly
follow the manufacturers' recommendations. Plastic and rubber materials affected
by ultraviolet rays including all PVC products shall be protected from direct
sunlight Material handling during cold weather shall take into account increased
brittleness for p1astic materials. Pipe which is warped or bowed due to
temperature variations such that the deviation from straightness is greater than one
inch shall not be installed.

3.02

GRADE AND ALIGNMENT: All sewer shall be laid utilizing an "in-line" laser
for vertical and horizontal control Vertical and horizontal alignment of the invert
shall, at any point, be within ±0.04 feet (½-inch) of plan elevation and line.

001

02732-3

�•
•
•
•
•

3.03

CUTTING OF PIPE: Full lengths of pipe shall be used whenever feasible.
Cutting of pipe where required shall be done only using methods as recommended
by the manufacturer, utilizing tools and equipment as required to provide a neat,
perpendicular 'cut without damage to the pipe or coatings. All burrs shall be
removed. Spigot ends of cut pipe shall be beveled similar to factory beveling. If
field cutting or coring of pipes exposes any bare metal surface, the surface shall
be covered with an epoxy coating.

3.04

LA YING OF SEWER: Each pipe shall be inspected for possible defects before
being placed in the trench. Joint surfaces shall be free of earth or frozen matter.
All pipe shall be laid with the bell ends upgrade to line and grade as called for on
the plans and each pipe as laid shall be checked by the Contractor. Pipe shall be
laid from the low end of the sewer upgrade. The use of brick, lumps of clay,
wood, etc., to bring the pipe to grade will not be permitted.

A.

JOINTS:
Shall be made in strict accordance with the manufacturers'
recommendations utilizing the recommended lubricant Wood blocks or other
approved materials shall be used to protect the pipe and fitting ends from pry bars,
chains, etc. Pipe shall be pushed closed to the "home" position and if joints do
not remain tightly closed the pipes shall be replaced.

B.

FINAL LINE AND GRADE: · After the pipe is laid. care in backfilling and other
operations shall be taken so as not to disturb its line, grade, or joint Misalignment
shall be cause for rejection of the sewer.

C.

POINTING: Pipe joints .on RCP sewer 30 inches in diameter and larger shall be
pointed up with grout on the inside after backfilling is complete.

3.05

PIPE BEDDING AND BACKFILL: Shall conform to Section 02223, Bedding
and Backfill for Utility Systems.

3.06

CONNECTIONS TO LIVE SEWERS: When connections are made with sewers
carrying sewage or water, special care must be taken that no part of the work is
built underwater; a flume or dam must be installed and pumping maintained if
necessary and the new work kept dry until completed and any concrete or grout
has set up.

3.07

SERVICE LATERALS: Shall be installed to the property line or length as
shown on the construction drawings. The location of the service lateral shall be
as shown, or when serving an existing building, to the location designated by the
building owner. Where an existing service lead is to be connected, the Contractor
shall locate the lead.

A.

001

CLEANOUTS: All service laterals shall be equipped with a cleanout near the
property line. The cleanout shall be a minimum four inch (4") diameter and
connected to the lateral with a wye fitting. The cleanout shall be extended to the
surface vertically' with the use of a 45° bend and 4" PVC pipe. The top of the
cleanout shall be equipped with a threaded plug which is set flush with the ground
02732-4

�surface. The cleanout cap shall be located six inches (6") inside the right-of-way
line. The cleanout assembly shall be oriented to facilitate cleaning of the sewer
lateral back to the sewer main.

B.

SERVICE LATERAL END: Shall be capped and blocked sufficiently to withstand
all required acceptance test pressures.

C.

MARKING: The Contractor shall mark the end of each service lateral with a 2
x 4 of sufficient length to extend from the service lateral to 3 inches below gr..de.
The top of each 2 x 4 shall have four 16 penny common nails driven into it for
subsequent location with a magnetic locator.

D.

RECORD OF LOCATIONS: The Contractor shall record and submit to the
Owner and the E_ngineer a location sketch of the service lateral fitting measured
upstream from the nearest manhole and shall record the location of the tenninus
of the service lateral with a minimum of two witness measurements to permanent
physical features, building corners, etc. Any services not readily located within
one year after date of final payment due to inaccurate as-built measurements shall
be field located by the Contractor at no expense to the Owner.

E.

RISERS: Where sanitary sewers are constructed deeper than 15 feet, service risers
shall be constructed as shown in the standard detail. VCP tees shall be encased
in concrete as shown on the plan details. Risers shall be constructed such that the
service lateral is 11 feet deep at the property line. When main sanitary sewers are
less than 15 feet deep, no riser is required and the lateral shall be constructed at
a slope such that the service lead is 11 feet deep at the property line, if feasible.
The six inch service laterals shall be constructed at a minimum slope of 0.60%
Lateral fittings shall be installed with the branch connection tilted up 45 degrees.

F.

SERVICE LATERAL INSPECTION: All service lateral pipes shall be left with
at least the top of the pipe exposed until inspected by the Owner or his
representative and authorization for backfill given.

3.08

REMOVAL OF UNSUITABLE MATERIAL: Whenever any pipe section,
fitting or appurtenance is found to be unsuitable for installation due to
specification non-conformance, poor workmanship, damage, or any other reason,
it shall be removed from the construction site during the working day by the
Contractor. Any material not so removed shall be painted or otherwise marked by
the Engineer to prevent its subsequent use.

3.09

RESTORATION AA1D CLEAN-UP:
Restoration and Clean-up.

3.10

SANITARY SEWER TESTING: In general, the sanitary sewers shall be tested
by applying an air pressure test described in the following paragraphs. Methods
of testing and measurement other than specified herein shall be approved by the
Engineer. The Contractor shall be responsible for furnishing all equipment and
labor for the air testing at no additional cost to the Owner. The Engineer may, as

001

02732-5

Shall conform to Section 02901,

�I
an alternative to or in addition to the air testing, require an infiltration test of the
sanitary sewers in certain instances. All testing shall be performed in the presence
of the Engineer.
A.

AIR TESTING: Is required to be performed on all sanitary sewers. The following
described test procedure shall be used.
1.

Equipment Record: Portable air compressor, standard air hose and
connections, minimum of 50 feet of single and triple air hose, one single
and one triple connection pneumatic sewer plug, one hand air pump,
stopwatch, and one air gauge, range 0-30 psig graduated in tenths from 0
to 10 psig.

2.

Preliminary Requirements:
After all sewer, lateral, and manhole
construction and backfilling operations have been completed, the sewer
shall be cleaned by the Contractor as follows:

3.

a.

Inflatable Balls: The Contractor shall furnish an inflatable rubber
ball of a. size that will inflate to fit snugly into the pipe to be
te~ted. The ball may, at the option of the Contractor, be used
without a tag line or a rope may be fastened to the ball to enable
the Contractor to know and control its position at all times. The
ball shall pass through the pipe with only the force of the water
impelling it All debris flushed out ahead of the ball shall be
removed at the first manhole. In the event cemented or we.dged
debris, or damaged pipe shall stop the ball, the Contractor shall
remove the obstruction.

b.

Pneumatic Plug Test: The pneumatic plugs shall pass the
following qualifying test in the presence of the Engineer and
Contractor prior to the line testing. One length of sewer pipe shall
be laid on the ground and sealed at both ends with the pneumatic
plugs to be checked; air shall be introduced into the pipe until the
pipe pressure reaches 15 psig. The pneumatic plugs being checked
shall hold against this pressure without bracing being needed, and
without movement of the plugs out of the pipe. All pneumatic
plugs shall pass the aforementioned qualifications before being
used to ~st the actual installation.

Test Procedures: Immediately following the pipe cleaning described, low
pressure air shall be introduced into the sealed line until the internal air
pressure reaches 4.0 psig greater than the average back pressure of any
groundwater pressure, as determine.d by the Engineer, that may be over the
pipe. At least two (2) minutes shall be allowed for the air pressure to
stabilize.
a.

001

Acceptance: The portion of the line being tested shall be accepted
if the portion under the test meets or exceeds the requirements of
02732-6

�•
•
•
•

ASTM C828._ This requirement shall be accomplished by
perfonning the test as follows: The time required in minutes for
the pressure to decrease from 3.5 to 2.5 psig greater than the
, average back pressure of any groundwater that may be over the
pipe shall not be less than the time shown for the given diameters
in the table following this paragraph. If the system does not meet
the foregoing requirements, the Contractor will be required to
locate and repair the leaks at no extra cost to the Owner and repeat
the tests until the allowable leakage is obtained.
AIR TEST TABLE
Note: If the section of line to be tested includes more than one pipe size (i.e., lateral
connections), calculate the test time for each size and add the test times to arrive at the
total test time for the section.
ASTM C828
MINIMUM TEST TIME FOR VARIOUS PIPE SIZES

PIPE SIZE
(INCHES)

4

6
8
10
12
15
18

001

TIME - PER 100'
MIN.
SEC.

0.3
0.7
1.2
1.5
1.8
2.1
2.4

18
42
72
90

PIPE SIZE
(INCHES)

21
24

27
30

108

33

126
144

36
39
42

TIME - PER 100'
MIN. SEC.

3.0
3.6
4.2
4.8
5.4
6.0

180
216
252
288
324

6.6

396
438

7.3

360

B.

INFILTRATION TEST: An infiltration test may be conducted on a sanitary sewer
only where the groundwater table is at least two feet above the invert of the sewer.
The Engineer will measure the amount of infiltration at the sanitary manholes
utilizing V-notch weirs or other measurement apparatus. The maximum allowable
infiltration shall be 200 gallons per mile per inch of diameter of sewer per 24
hours per day at any time for· an individual run between manholes.

C.

MANHOLE EXFILTRATION TEST: An exfiltration test shall be performed by
the Contractor of each manhole. All pipes shall be plugged and the manhole filled
with water to the bottom of the casting. After a stabilization period, the fall of
water will be measured to detennine the exfiltration rate. The maximum allowable
exfiltration shall not exceed 0.5 gallons per foot of depth per foot of diameter per
24 hour day. All materials, labor, and water shall be furnished by the Contractor
and the cost thereof shall be incidental to the cost of construction.

02732-7

�•

D.

PVC DEFLECTION TESTS: The completed. installation of PVC sewers shall at
no point have out-of-round pipe deflections greater than 5.0%. Deflectometer or
go no-go gauging tests shall be performed prior to acceptance c;if sewers. The test
shall be conducted after the final backfill has been in place at least 30 days.

E.

POST CONSTRUCTION Th1FILTRATION: Following complete construction and
prior to connection of services to the sewer, the Engineer shall have the option of
requiring retesting of any section of sewer where excessive infiltration is observed.
or suspected.. Any of the above tests may be utilized per the Engineer's
requirements. The costs of the tests shall be paid for by the Owner unless the test
fails wherein the costs shall be paid by the Contractor.

F.

TV INSPECTION: The Owner or his representative shall have the option of
perfonning a TV inspection of any section of sewer for signs of structural damage,
joint leaks or infiltration. The costs of the inspection shall be paid by the Owner
unless the inspection reveals faulty construction or materials wherein the costs
shall be paid by the Contractor.

G.

CORRECTION OF DEFECTIVE WORK: Whenever any of the above tests or
inspections indicate defective material or installation, the Contractor shall repair
and retest the section to the satisfaction of the Engineer at no cost to the Owner.
The use of chemical grouts shall be limited to the repair of minor joint leaks and
shall not be used without the specific written approval of the Engineer. Any pipe
or fitting having structural damage shall be removed and replaced.. Any PVC
sewer with deflection in excess of the 5.0% limitation shall be re-excavated,
inspected. for structural damage, and then rebed.ded and backfilled and retested..

END OF SECTION

001

02732-8

�•
•

SECTION 02901
RESTORATION AND CLEAN-UP

PART 1

GENERAL

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
RESTORATION M1D CLEAN-UP.
RELATED WORK

1.02

A.

. B.

REQUIREMENTS: The Contractor shall restore all areas disturbed. by his
construction operations to a condition equal to or better than the existing prior to
construction and shall clean-up and haul away all construction debris and litter
caused by his operation.
RELATED SECTIONS: Including, but not limited to:
1.

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

7.
8.

SECTION 015_60
SECTION 02231
SECTION 02513
SECTION 02525
SECTION 02528
SECTION 02946
SECTION 02938
SECTION 03001

- SPECIAL CONrROLS
- AGGREGATE BASE COURSE
- BITUMINOUS LEVELING/SURFACE COURSES
- CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER
- CONCRETE SIDEWALKS
- . TOPSOILING AND SEEDING
- SODDING
- CONCRETE

1.03

CLEAN-UP: General rough grading and clean-up shall follow immediately after
installation of utilities so that no more than 1,000 lineal feet of clean-up shall
remain to be completed at any time during construction. The Contractor shall
remove all equipment, debris, and waste material from the construction site and
material and equipment storage areas prior to final inspection and after restoration.

PART2

PRODUCTS - Tius section not used.

PART3

EXECUTION

3.01

PERMANENT PAVE:MENT: All street surfaces, driveways, curb and gutter, and
sidewalks removed or disturbed by construction operations shall be restored to
their original condition, or better unless otherwise shown on the plans and/or
details. Street base course and surfacing shall conform with Section 02231,
Aggregate Base Course, and Section 02513, Bituminous Leveling/Surface Course.
All concrete for restoration shall be air entrained Class A concrete conforming to
Section 03001, Concrete or Section 03300, Structural Concrete. All street,

001

02901-1

�I

I
I

•
•

driveway and sidewalk crossings shall be restored immediately after completion
of the crossing to accommodate vehicular and pedestrian traffic. Temporary
patching of pa;vements of bituminous base will be required in the event of final
restoration is not anticipated within 5 days of the crossing construction.
3.02

~flSCELLANEOUS STRUCTURES: Mail boxes, fences, culverts, ditches and
oth!!r existing structures shall be· resorted or replaced, as required, to original or
better condition in a manner acceptable to the Engineer.

3.03

BOUNDARY MARKER REPLACEMENT: The Contractor shall have replaced
by a Registered Land Surveyor, at his own expense, al section corners, property
corners or boundary markers of any type or material that may be damaged or
destroyed by his construction operation.

3.04

SEEDING: Lawn areas disturbed. by the Contractor's construction operations
shall be topsoiled and seeded in conformance with Section 02936, Topsoiling and
Seeding. In general, lawn areas shall be all areas back of the curb unless
otherwise designated on the plans or noted in the specifications.

3.05

SODDING: Areas designated on the drawings to be sodded shall be sodded in
conformance with Section 02938, Sodding. The Contractor at his option may sod
areas required or designated to be seeded.

3.06

PLANTING: Shrubs, other plantings, and trees removed during construction,
other than those specifically designated to be removed, shall be replaced with new
material equal to that removed. Replacement shall be with approved stock from
a State-inspected nursery and shall carry a one year replacement guarantee.

END OF SECTION

001

02901-2

�I

•

•
•

SECTION 02936
TOPSOILJJ\G AND SEEDING
PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

"'ORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection w;th
TOPSOJLlliG AND SEEDING.

1.02

RELATED WORK:
A.

REQUIRE11.ENTS: The Contractor shall topsoil, grade, fertilize, seed and mulch
lawn and other designated areas disturbed by construction operations. Attention
is directed to Section 01560 - SPECIAL CONTROLS.

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

TOPSOIL: Any topsoil _necessary to complete the work over and above the
topsoil stockpiled during construction operations shall be ftL.111ished by the
Contractor. Topsoil shall be free from brush, objectionable weeds or other litter,
and approved by the Engineer prior to spreading.

2.02

SEED: All seed to be used shall be labeled in accordance with the U.S.
Department of Agriculture Rules and Regulations under the Federal Seed Act and
shall be in accordance with the State seed rules and regulations. Seed certificates
or tags from the seed bags shall be submitted to the Engineer. Seed shall conform
to :MDOT Specification 8.21.09 for roadside and Class A mixtures.

2.03

FERTILIZERS: Chemical fertilizer shall be standard commercial grade with
packaging clearly marked in accordance with applicable Federal laws. Bulk
fertilizer may be used when certified delivery slips are furnished by the
Contractor.

2.04

MULCH: Straw, hay, and marsh hay used for mulching of grass seeded areas
shall ·meet the approval of the Engineer.

2.05

MULCH ADHESIVE: Mulch adhesive shall be latex-base adhesive confonning
to :MDOT Specification 8.21.11.

001

02936-1

�•-·
-·
•
•
•
•·

PART 3

. 3.01

PREPARATIQN OF SEED BED
A.

GRADING: Grades on areas to be seeded shall be maintained in a true and even
condition. Where the grades are not defined, they shall be established by the
Contractor to blend with existing adjacent grades without irregularities and shall
provide for proper drainage .

B.

PLACING TOPSOIL: The topsoil shall be evenly spread over the areas by blade
graders, or other approved methods, to a depth of at least 3 inches. Any
irregularities in the surface resulting from topsoiling or other operations shall be
corrected in order to prevent the formation of low places and pockets where water
will stand. Topsoil shall not be placed when the subgrade is in a condition
detrimental to seeding or proper grading.

C.

APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER: Fertilizer shall be distributed unifonnly over
the areas to be seeded at a rate which will provide 240 pounds per acre of
chemical fertilizer nutrients, in equal proportions of nitrogen, phosphoric acid and
potash and shall be incorporated into the soil to a depth of at least 3 inches by
discing, harrowing or other acceptable methods.

D.

CLEAN-UP: After completion of the above operations, the surface shall be
cleared of stones, roots, brush, wire, grade stakes and other objects that might be
a hindrance to maintenance operations.

3.02

001

EXECUTION

SEEDING

A.

SEEDING REQUIREMENTS: 11DOT Class A seed mixture shall be used on all
lawn areas. 11DOT Roadside seed mixture shall be used for areas disturbed by
construction and not defined as lawn area. No seeding shall be .done until the
Engineer has inspected the seed containers.

B.

SEEDING: Seed shall be sown by mechanical means except that areas
inaccessible to spreading equipment may be seeded by t he broadcast method.
Seeding shall be accomplished between the period of April 15 into the fall as long
as weather conditions pennit seed bed preparation. Seeding rate shall be Class A:
110#/A, Roadside: 100#/A.

c.

CO:Ml'ACTING: Immediately after seeding, the entire area shall be compacted
by means of a cultipacker, roller or approved equipment weighing 60 to 90 pounds
per linear foot of roller. The final rolling shall be a right angles to slopes to
prevent water erosion.

02936-2

�I
I
I

..

3.03

•
•

MULCHING

A.

STRAW AND HAY MULCH: After seeding and fertilizing operations have been
I
completed, straw, hay or marsh hay shall be spread over the swiace to a unifonn
thickness at the rate of two tons per acre. The mulch shall be loose enough to
allow sunlight to penetrate and air to slowly circulate, but thick enough to shade
the ground, reduce rate of water evaporation and prevent or reduce water or wind
erosion. Mulch which has become displaced shall be replaced at the Contractor's
expense. Cellulose fiber mulch shall be applied at the rate of 2000#/Acre ,vith 55
gallon Tackifyer/Acre. Cellulose fiber mulch shall not be used in lawn areas.

B.

MULCH ADHESIVE: The mulch shall be held in place by a spraycoating of
mulch adhesive. The Contractor shall protect all traffic, signs, structures, and
other objects from being mmed or disfigured by the adhesive material. Adhesive
material shall be applied uniformly at a rate of 400 gallons per acre and shall be
by spraying simultaneously with the mulch, or by spraying a swiace application
of adhesive immediately follov.'ing mulching .

.-

•

3.04

ESTABLISHMENT OF SEEDED AREAS: The Contractor shall be responsible
for the proper care of the seeded area during the period when the grass is
becoming established, and shall be responsible for a total grass cover. The
acceptance must be demonstrated. by the results.
A.

WATERlNG: The seed bed for lawn areas shall be given one watering
immediately after placement sufficient to wet at least two (2) inches of the seed
bed. Additional watering at the same rate shall be accomplished at five (5) day
intervals for a period of five (5) weeks, or a total of eight applications of water.
In case of rain, the Contractor shall obtain approval of the Engineer to omit an
application of water or re-schedule the watering interval. After the five week
period, maintenance of the seeded areas will be assumed by the Owner or
respective property owners. The Contractor will not be held responsible for any
mowing of seeded areas.

B.

REPAIR: If any time prior to the end of the five (5) week period during which
the Contractor is responsible for watering of the seeded areas, the ground is
displaced due to subsidence, or sliding or gullying on sloped areas, the Contractor
shall repair and re-seed the damaged areas at his expense.

C.

WEEDS: After the grass has become established and it appears to have more than
10% weeds, the Contractor shall spray with an approved herbicide.

E:t\'D OF SECTION

001

02936-3

�•

SECTION 02938
SODDING

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection w·th
SODDING.

1.02

RELATED WORK

A.

REQUIREMENTS: The Contractor shall topsoil, grade, fertilize and sod areas
designated on the plans or in the specifications. Attention is directed to Section
01560 - SPECIAL CONTROLS.

PART 2

PRODUCTS

2.01

TOPSOIL: Any topsoil necessary to complete the work over and above the
topsoil stockpiled during construction operations shall be furnished by the
Contractor. Topsoil shall be free from brush, objectionable weeds or other litter,
and approved by the Engineer prior to spreading. Any additional topsoils required
shall be fertile, friable, humus soil of mineral origin consisting of black loam, clay
loam, or sandy loam.

2.02

SOD: The class and blend of sod to be furnished under this specification shall
be shown on the plans or noted in the specifications. In general, sod shall be
mineral or muck type and shall contain a well developed cover of growing grass.
The sod shall be free of undesirable plants, stone, roots or other material
detrimental to the establishment of the sod. The minimum sod mat thickness shall
. be ¾" and sod snail be cut to provide an average thickness after laying of not less
than 1½". The Contractor shall provide certificates of sod blends from approved
suppliers prior to placement of the sod. Sod containing Merion Bluegrass will not
be accepted. Sod shall not be frozen.

2.03

FERTILIZERS: Chemical fertilizer shall be standard commercial grade \\-ith
packaging clearly marked in accordance with applicable Federal laws. Bulk
fertilizer may be used when certified delivery slips are furnished by the
Contractor. The mix shall be 12-12-12.

2.04

PEGS FOR SODDING: Pegs shall be at least 10 inches long of a size sufficient
to hold the sod.

002

02938-1

�•
•
•
•

ALIGN DR!VEWAY RETURN TO FIT
OPENING IN CURB &amp; GUTTER

CURB

FLOW LINE

1'' EXP. JOINT

1" EXP. JOINT

GUTTER PAN
GUTTER

CURB &amp;
GUTTER

CURB

SECTION A-A

CONCRETE DRIVEWAY OPENING

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

. SC-12

�EXTRA WIDTI-i TO BE ADDED AT

f

&gt;.!..LEYS &amp; COI.II.IERCIAI. DRJVES

,· ~~~~

~

/

WID™ AS Cl.l.l.£D
FOR ON Pl.ANS

:..•_ __:5~•----4,_ _ _ _ _ _W-'------t--.::..S'_--;

I

1/(' RADIUS
1/(' /FT. SLOPE
TOWARDS STREIT

Pl.ME Of WEAKNESS JOIP..'TS

--=-..;sm~,=,.~,_,·,-=...~~--.~ -...,_.,r.-.,...,.,.,_,:fn-4" CONCRETE SIDEWALK
™ICl&lt;NE:SS EQUAL TO CONC.
DRIVEWAY APPROACH

SUBBASE-IF CAU£D FOR
ON Pl.ANS (4" I.IIN.)

THICKENED CONCRETE SIDEWALK
50' MAX. D&lt;P. JOINT SPACING!

W-R-d

I

1/-r'

™ICl&lt;ENEO CONC. SIOEWALJ&lt;

EXP. JOINT

1/"r

I

&lt;

CONC. SlOEWALK

EXP. JOINT

1/"r EXP.

BACK OF CURS

0.6 R

0.4 R
NOTE: W .. 1.CIN. W!D'TH Of ™ICKENED
CONCRE:Tt: SlOEWAU&lt;.

R

(R-d) SH.AJ..1. NOT BE LESS THAN

JOINT

TIWTIC
DIRECTION

DRIVEWAY WlCliH.

K,;r
.

A
V

A
V

V

STRVCT\JRE

A

•

V

I:

50' I.IAX. EXP. JOINT SP&gt;.CING

""'·"''"'"""-a&lt;

PLACED
BE'IWN. SIDEWALK &amp; RJG1D S'TRVCT\JR£.

E//"'

PROPERTY UNE .

WHEN OIRECIT.O BY ll-1£ ENC:Hfl'.R THE
JOINT SH.A.1..1.. BE P ~ 1' FROI.I THE
PROPERTY UN£

II

CONC. SODEW'1J&lt;

1/1/z'

EXP.

JOINT

/
r'-.

.\

" ". EXP. JOINT

1

I
"

I

~, I "r

EXP. JOI

I

I

I

.....
" - - SIDEWALK S1W.L BE DMDED INTO UNrT AREAS OF NOT
I.IOR£ ll-\A.N 36 SO. FT. BY 1,1£N,1S OF CUT JOlr-tT'S. INSOFAR
AS POSSIBl.£. UNrT AREAS SH.A.1..1.. BE SQUARE AND NOT lESS
ll-\A.N 1 6 SQ. FT.

LOCATION OF JOINTS IN CONCRETE SIDEWALK
SID£WAU&lt; INTERS(CTIONS SI-WJ. BE OST
1.40NOUTHICAU..Y WITH JOINT IJH£S PLACED
NEAA TO PERPENDICULAR AS POSSIBLE
wmt SIDEWAU&lt; EDGE. TO AVOID NARROW
OR POINTED PIECES OF CONCRETE.
~

NOTES:
SIDEWALK lRANSVERSE SLOPE MAY VARY FROI.I
ZERO TO 1/-r PER FT. TO UEIT SIDE CONDmows.
WHO-I TAANSVERSE SLOPE IS LESS THAN 1/, PER
FT. LONCffiJDIIW. DR&gt;JN.A.GE UUST BE PROVIDED.
IN SETTlNG GAAD£S FOR C:01.CI.CERCIAI. DRlYES THE
TYPES OF THE USl~ VOilCLES SHOULD BE CONSIDERED

WHERE f'ERI.W-IE),lf STRUCTURE IS LOCATED IN SIDEWALK.
PtACE EXPANSION UATERIAI. AROUND STRUCT\JRE &amp; ADJUST
JOINT PATTERH TO IITTERSECT STRUC'TURE AS SHOWl'I.

lYPICAL SIDEWALK JOINT 1.AYOUT

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SIDEWALK DETAILS
SC-13

�I
66'

I
I
ow I

31'

-B

z

Cl!:

w
~

&lt;
.en

en

.:E
t-

&lt;
c.,

I

I

V)

3:

8'

23'

I

I

I

I

1 23

N

, ______ J
,

-----

_ _ _ _ W A T E R - - - -..........- - - ~ - . . . . - - - - - - , I C - - - W A T E R - - - - - - - -

z
&lt;
V)

:::E

(/)

I-

en

&lt;
c.,

I
I

I

SAN-------:---+--SAN--------~M---

--!----L--~M------------lI
I
I

GAS---t--

-GAS-------

1
I

I

z
&lt;
(/)

~

c.,

I

I
I
I
I
I
I
STANDARD STREET &amp; UTILllY LAYOUT
SCALE: 1"

=

GAYLORD
. __MS-1
91527.12

SC-14

20'

�•

1111§ .111111 ~ ~ 111111

1111§ -~

~~ C)
V,

Cl:)

N'

&gt;-

~

:--i-r
.....

N

0

~

66' R.O.W.

17.5'

VJ

....0

VI

15.5'

17.5'

15.5'
3• MINIMUM BITUMINOUS
SURFACE .

.

r

iJ_ ...~ . , C - 0 ½ 1 / 4 0~
0 W f f f i Z ¼ o / 4 . :..);.
• . •. : . 4 •

• J. •. : : ·•. ·..

L

ROADWAY SUBGRADE COMPACTED
TO 957. M.U.D.

STANDARD
CURB &amp;: GUTTER

NOTE: q_ ELEVATIONS EQUALS
TOP OF CURB ELEVATIONS

8" -22A GRAVEL, COMPACTED IN PLACE
TO 987. OF MAX. UNIT DENSllY

]YPICAL ROADWAY CROSS SECTION
NO SCALE

�r
J

f
f
J

,.
,
,
4• CONSTRUCTION LIMIT

1'+ S' TOPSOIL

0

1·-0

1'+/-

CONCRETE
CURB
t

.--

EXCAVATED
MATERIAL FREE
FROM DEBRIS

#4

2RE-STEEL
CONT. AT BOTTOM

COMPACTED SANO BASE

STANDARD CURB &amp; GUTTER DETAIL
SCALE: 1•= 1'-o"

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SC-16

�~,.. _,..~WI,~~-.
::s~o
en ►
v,
t,J

I

-&lt;

:--i-

~

-

0

N

~

GROUND LINE

~-.,----c====-==-=-+==-=-=-==r-----CASING LENClTH PER PLANS

TEMPORARY SHEETING
IF REQUIRED
CARRIER PIPE

fj EMBECO OR OTHER
APPROVED EXPANDING GROUT
VOID SHALL BE FILLED WITH PEASTONE
AGGREGATE (MIN.) OR AS REQUIRED
BY CONTROLLING AUTHORllY
Cl)

STEEL CASING PIPE - ALL CASING PIPE JOINTS
TO BE CONTINUOUS WELDED

]YPICAL JACKING SECTION

0

-

NO SCALE

--.l

MINIMUM CASING SIZES
CARRIER PIPE
SIZE

CASING SIZE
SEWER

CASING SIZE
WATER

6"
8"

12"
16"

18"

10"

18"

12"

20"

15"

24"

18"

JO"

-

CARRIER PIPE

14"
1" STEEL BANDS, 2 PER
SKID- 5'-0" MAX. SPACING

20"
24"

~
1. BELL ENDS OF CARRIER PIPE SHALL
NOT BE IN CONTACT W/ CASING PIPE.
2. BULKHEAD ENDS W/ EMBECO OR OTHER
APPROVED EXPANDING GROUT.
J. THE VOID SHALL BE FILLED W/ PEASTONE
AGGREGATE (MIN.) OR AS REQUIRED BY
CONTROLLING AUTHORllY.

STEEL CASING PIPE
W/MIN . 0.250" THICK WALL

STRUCTURAL GRADE REDWOOD OR
TREATED WOOD SKIDS- MIN. (2)
PER PIPE

SKID DETAIL
NO SCALE

�PART 3

EXECUTION

3.01

PREP ARATipN

BED

A.

GRADING: Grades on areas to be sodded shall be maintained in a true and even
condition. Where the grades are not defined, they shall be established by the
Contractor to blend with existing adjacent grades without irregularities and shall
provide for proper drainage.

B.

PLACING TOPSOIL: The topsoil shall be ~venly spread over the areas by blade
graders, or other approved methods, to a depth of at least 3 inches. Any
irregularities in the surface resulting from topsoiling or other operations shall be
corrected in order to prevent the formation of low places and pockets where water
will stand. Topsoil shall not be placed when the subgrade is in a condition
detrimental to sodding or proper grading.

C.

APPLICATION OF FERTILIZER: Fertilizer shall be distributed uniformly over
the areas to be _sodded at a rate which will provide 240 pounds per acre of
chemical fertilizer nutrients, in equal proportions of nitrogen, phosphoric acid and
potash and shall be incorporated into the soil to a depth of at least 3 inches by
discing, harrowing or other acceptable method. An additional 100 pounds per acre
of chemical fertilizer nutrients shall be applied over the completed sod
immediately prior to the first watering.

D.

CLEAN-UP: After completion of the above operations, the surface shall be
cleared of stones, roots, brush, wire, grade stakes and other objects that might be
a hindrance to maintenance operations.

3.02

002

OF SOD

PLACEMENT OF SOD: The sod, within 24 hours of cutting, shall be laid
smoothly, edge to edge, with staggered joints. The sod shall immediately be
pressed firntly into contact with the sod bed by tamping or rolling with approved
e.quipment to provide a true and even surface. Following compaction, screened
loam or topsoil shall be used to fill any cracks between sod pieces in a manner
which will prevent smothering of the grass.

A.

FINISHJNG: After sodding operations have been completed, the edges of the area
shall be smooth. On slopes steeper than, or equal to, 3 and 1, the sod shall be ·
fastened in place with suitable wooden stakes places 2' on center or by other
approved methods.

B.

WATERING: The sod shall be given one watering immediately after placement
sufficient to wet the sod through completely and to wet at least two (2) inches of
the sod bed. Additional watering at the same rate shall be accomplished at three
(3) day intervals for a period of three (3) weeks, or a total of eight applications
of water. In case of rain, the Contractor shall obtain approval of the Engineer to
omit an application of water or re-schedule the watering interval. After the three
week period, maintenance of the sod will be assumed by the Owner or respective
02938-2

�property owners. The Contractor will not be held responsible for any mowing of
sodded areas.
C.

REP AIR: If at any time to the end of the three (3) week period during which the
Contractor is responsible for watering of the sodded areas, the sod is displaced due
to subsidence, or sliding or gullying on sloped areas, the Contractor shall repair
and re-sod the damaged areas at his expense.

E:t\TD OF SECTION

002

02938-3

�SECTION 03001
CONCRETE

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
furnishing CONCRETE.

1.02

RELATED "WORK: The Contractor shall notify the Engineer in writing of the
name and address of the ready mix concrete supplier to be used one week prior
to placement of any concrete. The Engineer will then determine the competency
of the supplier and notify the Contractor if the concrete supplier is approved or
rejected. Attention is directed to Section 01560, Special Controls.

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

CE1\1ENT: Shall be ASTM C150, Type IA or I. Air content shall be 5.5
percent, with a tolerance of + 1.5, -0.5, when required.

2.02

AGGREGATE

A.

FINE AGGREGATE: Shall conform to MDOT Specification 2NS fine aggregate.

B.

COARSE AGGREGATE: Shall be gravel and stone confonning to MDOT
Specification 6A coarse aggregate.

2.03

WATER: Shall be clean and free from injurious deleterious substances such as
oil, alkali and organic matter. If drinking water quality is not used, the Engineer
shall ap.prove the water source before use.

2.04

2.05

001

ADMIXTURES

A.

AIR-ENTRAINING AGENT: Shall conform to ASTM C260.

B.

ACCELERATING AD1vIDITURES: Shall conform to ASTM C494, Type C, nonchloride and non-corrosive type.

C.

GENERAL AD11IXTURES: Shall be used only as herein specified. \Vritten
approval of the Engineer shall be required to use any other admixtures.
REINFORCING STEEL BARS: Shall conform to ASTM A615, Grade 60,
unless otherwise noted on the plans.

03001-1

�2.06

CURING COMPOUND: For exposed concrete swfaces shall be equal to MDOT
Specification 8.24.06.a., "White Membrane Curing Compound". (ASTM C309,
Type 2).

2.07

PROPORTIONS

A.

r

MIXTURE DESIGN: Cement, fine and coarse aggregates shall be mixed in
approximately 1:2:3 parts (dry and loose) by volume to achieve the following
minimum strengths and cement content

Cement Content
Sacks oer CYD

AA

6.5

A
B

6.0

5.5

Minimum 28 Day
Compressive
Stren2:th (psi)

4,000
3,500
3,000

B.

WATER CONTENT: Shall be the minimum amount necessary to provide
workability. Slump as measured by ASTh1 C143 shall be from 2 to 4 inches.

C.

MIXING: Transit mixing concrete conforming to ASTM C94 shall be used unless
otherwise approved by the Engineer.

D.

ADMIXTURES
1.

Air-Entraining Cement or Admixtures: Shall be used for all exposed
concrete, but shall not be required for buried concrete.

2.

Accelerating Admixtures: Shall be used only for buried concrete to allow
the Contractor to proceed sooner with the backfill operations. Use of
calcium chloride will not be allowed.

PART3

EXECUTION

3.01

CONCRETE PLACEMENT: Prior to placement of concrete, all forms and
placement of reinforcing steel and embedded items shall be approved by the
Engineer. Forms shall be cleaned of all debris and reinforcement secured in
position. Concrete shall be placed as rapidly and continuously as possible without
segregation. Concrete shall not be allowed to free fall more than six (6) feet

A.

001

TEMPERATURE: No concrete shall be placed in temperature lower than 4()° F.
unless special provisions are made and approved by the Engineer. Admixtures
shall not be used to prevent freezing.

03001-2

�J
J
J
J

B.

BASE: Concrete shall be placed on undisturbed soil, free from water, mud, frost,
and ice.

C.

COMP ACTIO~: Each layer of concrete shall be compacted with a mechanical
vibrator which shall be supplemented by handspading, rodding and tamping, as
required to consolidate the fresh concrete. Vibrators shall be applied at uniformly
spaced points no further apart than 18 inches or the visible effectiveness of the
machine. Vibrators shall not be inserted into layers which have begun to set nor
shall vibration be continued to a point where objectionable segregation occurs.
Form vibrators \\rill not be pennitted.

D.

REINFORCING STEEL: Shall be accurately placed and firmly held in place as
indicated on the plans. All splices shall have a minimum lap of 36 bar diameters.
The minimum cover for concrete placed against earth shall be 3 inches and for
surfaces exposed to the weather, shall be 2 inches.

E.

CURING OF CONCRETE: All concrete shall be maintained in a thoroughly wet
condition for not less than seven (7) days after placement by adding moisture, or
by preventing loss of original moisture, by one of the following methods:

3.02

1.

Moist Curing: Unformed surfaces shall be covered with burlap, and shall
be kept moist. Forms shall be kept wet at all times and when removed,
curing shall be continued by wetting concrete with a fine spray from a
hose until curing period is completed. Burlap shall not be used for curing
of exposed surfaces in the finished work. Ponding on slabs on earth may
be used.

2.

Moisture Barrier Curing: Surfaces shall be covered with a moisture barrier
lapped six (6) inches at the edges and ends. Moisture barrier covering
shall be weighted to prevent displacement and all holes and tears shall be
repaired and moisture added as required to maintain an adequate curing
environment.

3.

Membrane Curing: Shall be utilized on all exterior slabs, pavements,
sidewalks, curb and gutters.

FIELD AA1D LABORATORY CONTROL TESTS

A.

FIELD TESTING: The Engineer will perform slump tests (ASTM C143) for each
truckload of concrete placed and air content tests (ASTM C138) when applicable
and as required to maintain the air content within the tolerance specified.

B.

LABORATORY TESTING: Compressive strength tests shall be made for each
50 cubic yards of concrete placed. Three (3) molded concrete cylinders will be ..
made (AS1M C31) and delivered to the designated testing laboratory. The testing
laboratory shall perform the compressive strength tests in conformance with
ASTM C39. The cost of the testing will be paid by the Owner.
END OF SECTION

001

03001-3

�SECTION 03600
GROUT

PART 1

GENERAL

1.01

WORK INCLUDED: The work covered by this section of the specifications
consists of furnishing all plant, labor, equipment, and materials in connection with
the use of GROUT.

1.02

RELATED WORK:

Grout used in related work specified elsewhere shall
conform with the requirements· of this specification.

PART2

PRODUCTS

2.01

GROUT:

A.

PORTLAND CEMENT: Shall be ASThf C150, Type 1 or IA.

B.

NON-SHRINK GROUT: Shall conform to Corps of Engineers specification CRDC588. Material shall be as manufactured by \V. R. Meadows, Five Star, Embeco,
or equal. Non-staining material shall be used for all exposed work.

C.

MORTAR: Shall be ASThf C270, Type M.

2.02

Fll\1E AGGREGATE: Shall conform to MDOT Specification 2MS for masoruy
sand.

2.03

WATER: Shall be clean and free from injurious deleterious substances such as
oil, alkali and organic matter. If drinking water quality is not used, the Engineer
shall approve the water source before use.

2.04

ADMIXTURES: Shall not

2.05

PROPORTIONS: Grout shall be mixed in the following proportions:

A.

be used without written permission of the Engineer.

GROUT: Shall consist of proportions of Portland Cement or mortar and sand with
sufficient water. to form a workable mix in accordance with the following
requirements:
Parts
Cement

Use
Utility Structures - Precast Section Joints
Sewer Joints - when specified
001

03600-1

1
1

Parts
Cement .
2
2

�B.

. PART 3

NON-SHRJNK GROUT: Shall be mixed in accordance with the manufacturer's
recommendations.

EXECUTION

3.01

GROUT: Shall be placed within 1½ hours of the time the mix is completed.

3.02

NON-SHRINK GROUT FOR HYDRAULIC STRUCTURES: Used for
caulking around pipes through concrete walls, repair of joints, in concrete pipe and
other circumstances where the effectiveness and durability of the grout depends
upon the reduction or elimination of drying shrinkage shall be placed in
accordance with manufacturer's recommendations.

3.03

NON-SHRINK GROUT FOR EQUIPl\.fENT OR STRUCTURAL BASES:
Shall be used to completely fill the voids between bearing plates and the structural
foundations to provide full bearing for the base. All grout shall be placed in
accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations.

E1'.1D OF SECITON

001

03600-2

�I

~O Ul/S.Y. MINIIJ.Ul,l l.lDOT 1100U&lt;T-20M
OR MATCH EXISTING il-llCl&lt;NESS.

TRll.l EXISTING ASPKAI..T TO
A NEAT EDGE.

------.---- -----4----''------.....,C.."""

If' UDOT 2:2A GRA\/El.
BASE COMPACTED TO , oo,;
O£NSJ1Y.

IUPORTED GRANULAR BACKF1Ll OR
TR£NCH MATERW.. APPROVED
BY ENGINEER.

UNDISTURBED SOIL

APPROVED BEDDING FOR
STORM ANO SANITN«
SEWERS ANO WATERMAlN

4'

MIN. UNDERCUT FOR STORM

&gt;ND SANITARY SEWERS
mo WATERMAJN

NOTE: IN D:IS11NG STREETS, CONTR.ACTOR
Sl-wJ. RESTOR£ SURF&gt;.c:E TO ORIGINAL
OR BETTER CONomoN.

TRENCH BACKFJLL
UNDER RON&gt;WAY.
NO SCA!.£

TOPSOIL-3" 1.411'1. FOR SEEDING

f

"r

MIN. FOR SODDING

/

'

TRENCH l.(ATERw.. APPROVED
BY ENGll'lEIR.
APPROVED BEDDING FOR

STORM ANO SANITARY

S€WERS ANO WATERWJN

~ UIN. UNDERCUT FOR STORM
SA.'lrTAR"Y SB'l'ERS

mo

NORMAL IBENCH
BACKEJLL
NO SCA!.£
GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SC-1

�PLASTER COATING
ON EXTERIOR
PRECAST ADJ. RINGS

TOOL INTERIOR JOINTS

PRECAST CONCRETE
MH RISERS

Ji
MH STEPS 1

Ji

fl
Ji

,
'f
J
J
J
J

J

PRECAST CONC. ECCENTRIC
CONE VAF?:f HEIGHT AS REQ'D.
REINFORCED Fl.AT SLAB IS
ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATE

s•

0- RING JOINT

NOTE:

1. SANITAF?:f MANHOLES
SHALL BE PRECAST

CONCRETE FlllSTEEL TROWEL FlNISH
SLOPE 2 ON 1 2 TYPICAL

UNLESS NOTED
011-iERWISE

FLEXIBLE CONNECTION,
• KOR-N-SEAL; • A-LOCK;
OR EQUAL

z
:i

.3/4• -1 1/4• GAP AT
PIPE ENDS PROVIDED
TO MAINTAIN JOINT
FL.EXIBILTY

.J.,::...:-1~-:-- ~=-I-+--'-~~

INTEGRAL BASE
-.... __ - - FlRM UNDISTURBED SOIL.
COMPACTED SAND,
OR CONCRETE

STANDARD SANITARY MANHOLE
NO SCALE

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SC-2

�NOTE:
FOR e; DIA SEWERS WITH DROP
CONNECTION, TI-iE DROP PIPE
SHALL BE e;' DIA FOR SEWERS
1o• AND LARGER, THE DROP
PIPE SHALL BE ONE SIZE
' SMALLER THAN TI-iE MAIN LINE.

FLEXIBLE CONNECTION,
"KOR-N-SEALN, "A-LOCK",
OR EQUAL

2' LONG TEE FITTINGBRANCH DOWN

!

I

r

INLET SEWER OR

,........__ _-t-=-~1 r - - -.......

SAN. SERVICE LEAD

&lt;f.

oa
w

w-

-a.

0..

'=
(..)

w
a.

a. V&gt;
0
0:: V&gt;

STD. LENGTH
PIPE CUT, ONE
LENGTH ONLY TO FlT

Cl V)
N

w

....J

z

,- :::&gt;

LONG RADIUS
90" ELBOW

"A:

·.·.· -.~

NON-SHRINK GROUT

·. 4 .· :.

CONCRETE ENCASEMENT
o MIN. All AROUND

:;.: ·.. : ...:

STANDARD DROP PIPE DETAIL
NO SCALE

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SC-3

�·•
.

~

2::

Vt (/)
N
I

;--1 ....

N

C)

&gt;
-&lt;
~
0

~

"'7?0,&lt;¼¼¼¼(¼:'~-@'i
45· ELBOW

//Jl I

.·:.--..·,:. J

0.67. GRADE (MIN.)

: , ... ·.

(/)

45" ELBOW

.
&lt;.

COMPACTED GRANULAR
BEDDING

n

.1,..
.-.,,,'l..?/

'

COMPACTED GRANULAR
BEDDING OR 6A STONE

. -·.

MINIMUM
LATERAL ,:LOO.
. 67. (MIN.(&amp;_ :

FIRM UNDISTURBED
SOIL OR TAMPED SAND

COMPACTED GRANULAR
BEDDING OR 6A STONE-

HORIZONTAL CONNECTION

VERTICAL RISER

SANIIARY

~l~.4:
~ «t~·~A
'., :..' //-.'

SERVICE

CONNECTIONS

(PVC PIPE ONLY)
NO SCALE

�\0

7' C)

t;; v.i &gt;
1-J I
-&lt;
:--i - r
.....
0
N

fj

66' R.O.W.
w

z

:J
3::
0

0:::

CLEANOUT WITH THREADED
PLUG FLUSH WITH GRADE

~I
0

~_

I 6"

~

4"r;, MIN.
CLEANOUT

u

(/)

Q

~I

VI

io

0

u

21
PROP. SAN. SEWER

6"r/J MIN. SERVICE LEAD

//
~1
1

SANITARY SERVICE LEAD DETAIL
NO SCALE

L.

FITTING

�TOOL INTERIOR JOINTS

PRECAST CONCRETE
MH RISERS

MH STEPS 1

o

__.-- PRECAST CONC. ECCENTRIC
_-CONE VARY HEIGHT AS REQ'D.
REINFORCED FLAT SLAB IS
ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATE

O.C.

4•-0·

i------------;• •:
UNLESS NOTED
O11-iERWISE

NON-SHRINK
GROUT AROUND PIPE

CONCRETE FlLLSTEEL TROWEL FINISH
SLOPE 2 ON 12 TYPICAL
INTEGRAL

BASE
FIRM UNDISTURBED SOIL.
COMPACTED SAND,
OR CONCRITE

STANDARD STORM- MANHOLE
NO SCALE

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

SC-6

�1 - - - - - - STANDARD MUNICIPAL

r.=:=~s::::ll I

CATCH BASIN CASTING.
(SEE NOTE NO. 1)
MINIMUM 1/2• CEMENT
PLASTER OUTSIDE

PRECAST CONC.
MANHOLE SECTIONS
TOOL INTERIOR
JOINTS

NON-SHRINK GROUT

.: ..
~___._-·_;·•~
·

a.
t

0

0
NOTE:

1. CASTING TO BE SET
~RGg~i~RB OR

I

4' 0

7I ...
~

:::&gt;
Vl

N .
z

~

;.,._....1,•~
·· r-··J.......,..-----P---.J._--'7':--'+:-:-i...._

:~//// ~

=,:.:..•.. //:

2. INTEGRAL BASE IS
6'-r:J'
\
AN A C C E P T A B L E C
ALTERNATE.

I
1/

SECTION

STANDARD CATCH BASIN
NO SCALE

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

:::E

SC-7

FIRM UNDISTURBED
SOIL. COMPACTED
SAND OR CONCRETE

�PRECAST CONCRETE
MH RISERS

MH STEPS 1

o

- - - - - PRECAST CONC. ECCENTRIC
CONE VARY HEIGHT AS REQ'D.
REINFORCED FLAT SLAB IS
ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATE

0 .C.

0-RING JOINT

JOTE:

4'-(j DlA.

i . SANITARY MANHOLES
SHALL BE PRECAST

UNLESS NOTED

b

I
ii,

•PIPE SIZES GREATER

0

CONCRETE FlLL-

THAN Jo• DIA. AT 90 •
BENDS REQUIRE A

0

- S'TEQ TROWEL FlNISH

•

6' DIA. MANHOLE

..

0

1
NTEGRAL BASE

·O

.: ·w.'·

----------1:_:__:--=--.c....,,.,,,r:---------•· -·· . • · .0 ·

z

~

STANDARD MANHOLE
24" TO 48" PIPE;
NO SCALE

GAYLORD
MS-I
91527.12

SC-8

FlRMCONCRETE
UNDISTuRSED SOIL.
OR
COMPACTED
SAND,

�PUMPER CONNECTION
SHALL FACE· STREET
GRADE UNE ON HYDRANT SHALL BE ·
SET AT FlNISH GROUND SURFACE OR
AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.

1• GRAVEL OR·
CRUSHED STONE

a::

w

&gt;

0

(.)

HYDRANT DRAIN SHALL
BE PLUGGED UNLESS
DIRECTED OTHERWISE.

UNDISTURBED

:i
~

DISTANCE DETERMINED
BY RESIDENT ENGINEER

4• THICK X 2 SQ. FT. BEARING AREA
SLAB OF PRECAST OR POURED CONC.
OR OlliER SLAB MATERIAL APPROVED
BY RESIDEt--.'T ENGINEER.

KEEP CONC. THRUST BLOCK
BELOW HYDRANT DRNN. SEE
THRUST BLOCK SCHEDULE &amp;
DETAIL IN SPECS. FOR SIZE.

HYDRANT DETAIL
NO SCALE

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

THRUST BLOCK

SC-9

�STREET R.0.W.

PROPERlY LINE
OR AS DIRECTED
BY ENGINEER

0::

w

~

CONSTRUCT
GOOSE NECK
GoRP. STOP

(.)

z
SE

1"~ MIN.
SERVICE PIPE

MUNICIPAL sm. SERVICE
STOP (CURB VALVE)
REMOVABLE PLUG

WATER SERVICE CONNECTION DETAIL
NO SCALE

GAYLORD
MS-1
91527.12

�SIDEWALK RAMP lYPE

SIDEWALK RAMP lYPE 3 MODIFIED

PAVEMENT

CURS k
GUTTER

RAMP
IMXIMUI.I SLOPE
1• PER f'OOT

SIDEWALK

.. .. . .. . . .
JOIITT

4• I.CINIMUI.I THICKNESS

rt' f'OR DRIVE APPROACHES
1• EXPANSION JOIITT

lYPICAL SIDEWALK RAMP/DRIVE APPROACH SECTION

j_

• 4.

.....·.. : -~ .

SECTION THRU CURB CUT

GAYLORD
MS-I
91527.12

PEDESTRIAN RAMP DETAIL
SC-11

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008329">
                <text>Gaylord_Municipal-Standards_1992</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008330">
                <text>Capital Consultants, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008331">
                <text>1992</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008332">
                <text>Municipal Standards for the City of Gaylord</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008333">
                <text>The Municipal Standards for the City of Gaylord were prepared by Capital Consultants, Inc. in 1992.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008334">
                <text>Ordinances, municipal</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008335">
                <text>Gaylord (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008336">
                <text>Otsego County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008337">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008339">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008340">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008341">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008342">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038327">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54701" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58972">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/447f3ea5f481d8360089632001bd17fd.pdf</src>
        <authentication>d4ea91742c5dd56b530a2f765001ce93</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008328">
                    <text>December 1, 1993
The Special Meeting of the City of Gaylord Zoning Board of Appeals was opened by
Chairman Brecheiseq at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, December 1, 1993, in the City Council
Chambers, located in the City County Building, 225 West Main Street, Gaylord, Michigan.
Members Present:

Brecheisen, Copenhaver (Alternate), Dickerson, Sharrard (Alternate),
Thomas and Turczynski.

Members Absent:

Becker, Haber and Yarsevich.

The minutes of the previous meeting will be considered at the next Special Meeting of the
Zoning Board of Appeals.
Request for a Sign Variance by Chris Monte at Monte's Soft Cloth Auto Wash
located at 1375 West Main Street
Chairman Brecheisen reviewed the request. Mr. Chris Monte and Mr. Tom Wishman
(representing Amor Sign Studio) were present to answer any questions the Board had
regarding the request. Mr. Wishman reviewed the proposal. Mr. Wishman stated the
proposed sign would be obstructed if placed in conformance with the City Sign Ordinance,
but if placed at the front property line it would be visible by traffic going either east or west
on M-32. The proposed sign if placed at the property line would conform with old
requirements and would be in excess of fifty (50) feet from the center of the roadway.
Motion by Copenhaver, supported by Turczynski to grant a Sign Variance to Chris Monte
for the erection of a fifty-six (56) square foot free standing sign at 1375 West Main Street.
Mr. Monte is permitted to place the sign on the front property line and the variance is
granted based upon the following "finding of fact":
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.

Parcel is unique because of the location of adjacent property signage.
The sign cannot be reasonably used in accordance with Sign Ordinance
because of the building location and obstructed view from the west.
The variance would not grant the applicant a right or privilege not enjoyed by
neighboring property owners.
The variance request is not the result of self-created actions on the part of the
applicant.
The variance will not injure or damage neighboring properties and in fact will
preserve the character of the area.
The variance is being requested because of the unique characteristics of the
property and not because of economic or personal reasons.
The variance constitutes the minimum action necessary to permit
reasonable use of the property and insure public safety.

The variance is granted to Mr. Monte for Monte's Soft Cloth Auto Wash and becomes
invalid if the business is discontinued, relocated or the sign is altered.

�Ayes: Brecheisen, Copenhaver, Dickerson, Sharrard, Thomas and Turczynski.
Nays: None. Motion carried.
I

Motion by Turczynski to adjourn.
Meeting adjourned at 7:24 p.m.
Norm Brecheisen, Chairman

�January 26, 1994
The Special Meeting of the City of Gaylord Zoning Board of Appeals was opened by
Chairman Brecheisen at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, January 26, 1994, in the City Council
Chambers, located in the City County Building, 225 West Main Street, Gaylord, Michigan.
Members Present:

Becker, Brecheisen, Copenhaver (Alternate), Dickerson, Haber and
Sharrard (Alternate).

Members Absent:

Thomas, Turczynski and Yarsevich.

Motion by Haber, supported by Becker to dispense with the reading of the minutes of the
previous two (2) meetings and to accept them as presented.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Request for an Outer Wall Covering Variance by Gary Merritt for an addition to
be constructed at Nu Way Supply, 403 West Sheldon Street, C-2, Central Commercial
District
Chairman Brecheisen reviewed the request. Mr. Gary Merritt (property owner) and Mr. Bill
Ford (builder) were present to answer any questions the Board had regarding the request.
Mr. Ford stated it was the intention of the property owner to make the proposed addition's
outer wall materials and setbacks the same as the existing building. Mr. Ford also stated
the purpose of the proposed addition was to allow inside storage of inventory currently
stored outside. It was also discussed that although the current and proposed addition will
be located three (3) feet from the north property line, the adjacent neighbor to the north
has a fence which is attached to the north side of the building and is therefore utilizing
three (3) feet of the property owned by Nu Way Supply.
The Board discussed the fact that Zoning Ordinance regulations regarding outer wall
materials and setbacks have changed since a previous addition to the building within the last
four (4) years. The Board also discussed prior action by Council in which they had
considered abandoning the portion of the street in front of the proposed addition, but for
legal reasons could not.
Motion by Copenhaver, supported by Dickerson to grant a request by Gary Merritt of
Nu Way Supply for an Outer Wall Covering Variance for the construction of a new addition
at 403 West Sheldon Street. The Board also allows the building to be constructed three (3)
feet from the north property line. The variance is granted based on the following "findings
of fact":

�1.

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.

The addition would be no less nonconforming than the current structure;
Unique circumstances regarding setback and outer wall materials already exist and
the addition would be consistent with the existing structure;
Nu Way Supply owns the adjacent properties to the west of the proposed location;
Nu Way Supply is already extending a "friendly neighbor" privilege to the property
owners to the north;
The addition would aid in the storage of inventory currently stored outside;
The Ordinance regulating these issues have changed since the previous addition; and
The variance conforms to the spirit of the Ordinance

Ayes: Brecheisen, Copenhaver, Dickerson, Haber and Sharrard.
Nays: None. Abstained: Becker. Motion carried.
Becker abstained due to conflict of interest.
Motion by Haber, supported by Becker to adjourn.
Meeting adjourned at 7:15 p.m.
Norm Brecheisen, Chairman

�March 23, 1994
The Special Meeting of the City of Gaylord Zoning Board of Appeals was opened by
Chairman Brecheisen at 7:00 p.m. on Wednesday, March 23, 1994, in the Circuit Court Jury
Room, located in the City-County Building, 225 West Main Street, Gaylord, Michigan.
Members Present:

Becker, Brecheisen, Dickerson, Sharrard (Alternate), Thomas and
Turczynski.

Members Absent:

Copenhaver (Alternate), Haber and Yarsevich.

Motion by Becker, supported by Sharrard to dispense with the reading of the minutes of the
previous meeting and to accept them as presented.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
No report from Planning Commission Liaison, as Brecheisen was out of town.
A.

Request for a Front Yard Setback Variance by Carl Jansen for an addition to be
constructed at Mayfair Plastics, Inc., 845 Dickerson Road, M-1 Manufacturing
District.

Chairman Brecheisen reviewed the request. Mr. Carl Jansen, President of Mayfair Plastics,
and the contractor for Up-North Builders were present to answer any questions the Board
had regarding the request. Mr. Jansen stated the purpose of the proposed addition was to
allow for additional warehouse space for shipping and is necessary for the growth of the
business. Mr. Jansen also stated the need for 2 truck wells. If the proposed addition was
no wider than 40', it could not be used, as storage space is needed on both sides and still
have room for trucks to run through the center. The truck trailers will be at ground level
and no excavating is needed.
The Board discussed the fact that the building is currently a non-conforming building and
that the Ordinance changed after the building was built. The new addition would not make
the building any less conforming than the current structure. The practical difficulty was
created by government action, as the Ordinance was changed after the building was created.
Therefore, the request for the proposed addition is a reasonable request.
Chairman Brecheisen read correspondence from Dave Siegel indicating he reviewed the
plans and supports the request be granted for construction.
Motion by Dickerson, supported by Turczynski to grant a request by Carl Jansen of Mayfair
Plastics, Inc. for the construction of a new addition at 845 Dickerson Road. The variance
is granted based on the following "findings of fact":

�1.

The parcel is unique (in terms of size, shape, topography, location, or natural
features) when compared to other parcels in the same zoning classification.

2.

The parcel cannot be reasonably used in a manner consistent with the
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.

3.

The applicant would not be given a right or privilege not enjoyed by
neighboring properties if the variance is granted.

4.

The variance request is not the result of self-created actions on the part of the
applicant.

5.

The variance will not injure or damage neighboring properties.

6.

The variance is not being requested because of personal or economic hardship
rather than the unique physical situation of this particular property.

7.

The variance does constitute the minimum action necessary to permit
reasonable use of the land and building.

Ayes:

Brecheisen, Dickerson, Sharrard, Thomas and Turczynski.

Abstained:

Becker, due to conflict of interest.

B.

Request for a Front Yard Setback Variance by Mr. John MacLeod for an addition
to be constructed at the Otsego Memorial Hospital, 825 North Center Avenue, C-1,
Central Commercial District.

Chairman Brecheisen reviewed the request. Mr. John MacLeod and Mr. Terry Morgridge
(architect) were present to answer any questions the Board had regarding the request. Mr.
MacLeod stated the purpose of the proposed addition was to allow for more room on the
east side. With the growth of the county, there is a need for a new emergency department,
radiology, lab, physical therapy and raspatory therapy. The canopy area would not obstruct
the view of traffic. The intent of the 32' width would allow 2 vehicles under the canopy.
The entrance is designed for one-way traffic with traffic exiting north. The emergency room
will be in line with North Center Avenue for visibility purposes to make it easier for citizens
to locate the emergency room entrance.
The Board discussed the fact that public safety was secured, there would be not obstruction
problem for traffic. The request for the proposed addition fits with the intent of the
Ordinance. The nearest intersection is Shipp Street, which is at a distance of approximately
150'. The Ordinance does provide for a canopy up to 12' from the property line.

�Motion by Thomas, supported by Becker to grant a request by John MacLeod of the Otsego
Memorial Hospital, for the construction of a new addition at 825 North Center Avenue.
The variance is granted based on the following "findings of fact":

•

1.

The parcel is unique (in terms of size, shape, topography, location, or natural
features) when compared to other parcels in the same zoning classification.

2.

The parcel cannot be reasonably used in a manner consistent with the
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.

3.

The applicant would not be given a right or privilege not enjoyed by
neighboring properties if the variance is granted.

4.

The variance request is not the result of self-created actions on the part of the
applicant.

5.

The variance will not injure or damage neighboring properties.

6.

The variance is not being requested because of personal or economic hardship
rather than the unique physical situation of this particular property.

7.

The variance does constitute the minimum action necessary to permit
reasonable use of the land and building.

Ayes:

Becker, Brecheisen, Dickerson, Thomas and Turczynski.

Abstained:

Sharrard, due to conflict of interest.

C.

Request for a Side Yard Setback Variance by Mr. Fred and Theresa Charboneau for
an addition to be constructed at Fred's Garage, 1035 1/2 West Main Street, C-2,
General Commercial District.

Chairman Brecheisen reviewed the request. Mr. Fred Charboneau was present to answer
any questions the Board had regarding the request. Mr. Charboneau stated the purpose of
the proposed addition is to expand on the west side of the existing building, as more room
is needed. The west side will be used as the service area for cars, which will approach from
the south, and the east side of the building will be used for a showroom. Mr. Charboneau
also stated there would be no maintenance necessary on the west side of the building and
snow removal will not be a problem, it will be hauled away.
The Board discussed the fact that there is practical difficulty. The proposed addition will
not be any less conforming than the existing building. The area is not a high traffic area
and is on a side street (Milbocker Road). Therefore, the request for the proposed addition
is a reasonable request.

�Motion by Becker, supported by Turczynski to grant a request by Fred Charboneau of
Fred's Garage for the construction of a new addition at 1035 1/2 West Main Street. The
variance is granted based on the following "findings of fact":

Ayes:

1.

The parcel is unique (in terms of size, shape, topography, location, or natural
features) when compared to other parcels in the same zoning classification.

2.

The parcel cannot be reasonably used in a manner consistent with the
requirements of the Zoning Ordinance.

3.

The applicant would not be given a right or privilege not enjoyed by
neighboring properties if the variance is granted.

4.

The variance request is not the result of self-created actions on the part of the
applicant.

5.

The variance will not injure or damage neighboring properties.

6.

The variance is not being requested because of personal or economic hardship
rather than the unique physical situation of this particular property.

7.

The variance does constitute the minimum action necessary to permit
reasonable use of the land and building.
Unanimous. Motion carried.

Motion by Sharrard, supported by Becker to adjourn. Meeting adjourned at 7:50 p.m.

Norm Brecheisen, Chairman
Zoning Board of Appeals

�March 2, 1994

The regular meeting of the Gaylord City Planning Commission was opened at 7:00 p.m.
by Chairperson Brown.

Members Present: Brown, Campbell, Merry, Murphy, Payton, Squires, Galer and Deming.
Members Absent:

Brecheisen (excused).

Also Present:

Kathy Franckowiak, Secretary
Dave Siegel and Councilmember Nelson.

Motion by Campbell, supported by Deming to accept the minutes of February 1, 1994 as
presented.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
No report from ZBA Liaison, as Brecheisen was absent. Councilmember Nelson did
indicate Mayfair Plastics is proposing a wall extension on Dickerson Road.
No report from Council Liaison. Dave Siegel updated the Planning Commission on the
April 5, 1994 election and handed out "Fact Sheets" on street millage.
7:05 p.m. Councilmember Wambold entered the room at this time.
Master Plan Committee Report was given by Squires. The meeting scheduled for
Tuesday, February 15, 1994 was canceled. Squires will schedule another meeting, which
will also include Dave Siegel and Councilmember Nelson.
Farmer's Market Committee and Flea Market Committee was given by Brown. The City
Attorney prepared a draft copy of the "Rules and Regulations for Farm Markets, Flea
Markets, Transient Traders, Peddlers And Solicitors", along with an "Amendment To The
Gaylord Ordinance Code 21.00 Through 21.017".
Motion by Squires, supported by Campbell to hold a Public Hearing on Wednesday, April
6, 1994 at 7:00 p.m. for consideration of the proposed Rules and Regulations for Farm
Markets, Flea Markets, Transient Traders, Peddlers and Solicitors and for the
consideration of Amendment to the Gaylord Ordinance Code 21.00 through 21.017.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
The Planning Commission is invited to attend the meeting on Friday, March 4, 1994 at
10:00 a.m. in the City Council Chambers. Representative Lowe will be present to discuss
the road closure for Alpenfest 1994.

Meeting adjourned at 7:53 p.m.

Kathy Franckowiak, Secretary

City Planning Commission

�April 6, 1994
The regular meeting of the Gaylord City Planning Commission was opened at 7:00 p.m. by
Chairperson Brown.
Members Present: Brown, Brecheisen, Merry Murphy, Payton, Squires, Galer and Deming.
Members Absent: Campbell (excused).
Also Present:

Kathy Franckowiak, Secretary
Dave Siegel, Councilmember Nelson and Lori Robinson

Motion by Brecheisen, supported by Merry to accept the minutes of March 2, 1994 as
presented.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Public Hearing opened at 7:03 p.m. by Chairperson Brown for consideration of the
following:
Consideration of Rules and Regulations for Farm Markets, Flea
Markets, Transient Traders, Peddlers and Solicitors.
Amendment to the City of Gaylord Ordinance Code, Section 21.00021.017, PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS, TRANSIENT TRADERS,
CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS, FARM VENDORS, FARM
MARKETS AND FLEA MARKETS.
Amendment to the City of Gaylord Zoning Ordinance, Section lO(b ),
C-2, Central Commercial District, USE REGULATIONS.
Discussion by the Board took place at this time.
Public Hearing remained open and Chairperson Brown continued with regular business.
Report from ZBA Liaison, Brecheisen reported there were two variances for additions and
one variance for the hospital addition.
Report from Council Liaison, Councilmember Nelson reported the voters approved the
street election.
Master Plan Committee Report was given by Squires. The committee will meet to discuss
what the committee can do with the Master Plan and what parts of the Master Plan will
need outside help. Squires indicated he would prepare a draft for the Council indicating
such.
Public Hearing closed at 7:30 p.m. by Chairperson Brown.
Motion by Squires, supported by Brecheisen that the City Planning Commission recommend
to the City Council for adoption the following:
Consideration of Rules and Regulations for Farm Markets, Flea
Markets, Transient Traders, Peddlers and Solicitors.
Amendment to the City of Gaylord Ordinance Code, Section 21.00021.017, PEDDLERS, SOLICITORS, TRANSIENT TRADERS,
CHARITABLE SOLICITATIONS, FARM VENDORS, FARM
MARKETS AND FLEA MARKETS.
Amendment to the City of Gaylord Zoning Ordinance, Section lO(b ),
C-2, Central Commercial District, USE REGULATIONS.

�Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Dave Siegel updated the Board on the North Center Avenue project.
Meeting adjourned at 7:35 p.m.

Kathy Franckowiak, Secretary
City Planning Commission

�May 4, 1994
The regular meeting of the Gaylord City Planning Commission was opened at 7:00 p.m. by
Chairperson Brown.
Members Present: Brown, Brecheisen, Campbell, Murphy, Payton, Squires, Galer and
Deming.
Members Absent: Merry.
Also Present:

Kathy Franckowiak, Secretary
Dave Siegel and Councilmember Nelson

Motion by Campbell, supported by Murphy to accept the minutes of April 6, 1994 as
presented.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
7:05 p.m. Merry entered the room.
Report from ZBA Liaison, Brecheisen asked the Planning Commission for recommendations
from a handout regarding Zoning Ordinance changes as follows: Section 15, C(2b ), Page
32, Section 9, B(l), Page 17, Section 9, D(l-6), Page 19, Section 10, B(la), Page 22 and
Section 10, B(3a-d), Page 23.
Report from Council Liaison, Councilmember Nelson reported the Council passed the
recommendations made by the Planning Commission in regards to Farm Markets, Flea
Markets, Transient Traders, Peddlers and Solicitors. The Council did add the word
"approved" in regards to City sponsored events.
Master Plan Committee Report was given by Squires. The committee is still working on the
Master Plan.
Dave Siegel informed the Planning Commission that Mark Wycoff of Planning and Zoning
News will be sending a Comprehensive Plan. Dave recommended to the Planning
Commission to utilize Mark Wycoff for the Master Plan. It will take approximately one year
to complete with meetings twice a month.

Meeting adjourned at 7:40 p.m.

Kathy Franckowiak, Secretary
City Planning Commission

�April 11, 1994
The Regular Meeting of the Gaylord City Council was opened with prayer by Councilman
Wambold at 7:00 p.m. on Monday, April 11, 1994, in the City Council Chambers, located
in the City-County Building, 225 West Main Street, Gaylord, Michigan. The Pledge of
Allegiance followed the invocation.
Members Present:

Bates, Dunn, Grocock, Mankowski, Nelson and Wambold.

Members Absent:

Tholl.

Motion by Nelson, supported by Wambold to dispense with the reading of the minutes of
the previous meeting and to accept them as presented.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Councilman Nelson publicly thanked City voters for their support of the City's recent
passage of a 4.4 millage levy for infrastructure and roadway improvements.
Motion by Dunn, supported by Bates to authorize City Manager Dave Siegel to apply for
the 1995 Transportation Enhancement Grant for non-motorized vehicles for the construction
of a sidewalk/bike path on North Ohio Avenue from M-32 north to Fairview Road and on
North Street east to North Center Avenue. The City will appropriate the $13,000 required
local match and the project will be undertaken upon the grant being awarded.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Dunn, supported by Wambold to accept an engineering proposal from Capital
Consultants, Inc. for inspection services during the reconstruction of North Center Avenue
at an estimated cost of $84,980.00.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Mankowski, supported by Bates to award the bid for the City's annual spring
clean-up to Waste Management of Northern Michigan at a cost of $19.00 per compacted
yard. The proposal from Waste Management was the only one received.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Mankowski, supported by Nelson to accept the first reading of an amendment
to the City of Gaylord Ordinance Code and Zoning Ordinance, FARM MARKETS, FLEA
MARKETS, TRANSIENT TRADERS, PEDDLERS AND SOLICITORS.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Nelson, supported by Wambold to accept the City Manager's recommendation

�and appoint the auditing firm of Distel, Okrei and Keskine to conduct the City's annual
1993 /94 annual audit.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Mankowski, supported by Bates to authorize the City Manager to approve change
orders in an amount up to $25,000 during the North Center Avenue reconstruction project.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Nelson, supported by Dunn to approve an amendment to the DDA 1993/94
Budget increasing budgeted expenditures for administration to $25,430.00 and decrease total
operation expenditures to $10,003.00. Total amended budgeted expenses for both
operations and administration are $35,733.00.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Ms. Sherrie Schuster, Executive Director of the Downtown Development Authority,
appeared before City Council with an update on the Streetscape project.
Motion by Mankowski, supported by Dunn to approve a request by Diana's Delights for an
Outdoor Cafe Permit from May 31 through September 5, 1994. Ms. Roney is granted
approval contingent upon the cafe being operated as it bas in previous years.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Nelson, supported by Mankowski to approve a request by Mr. Richard Yaple for
a Taxi Cab Permit for a period to expire December 31, 1994. Mr. Yaple must conform with
all City inspection and insurance requirements.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Bates, supported by Wambold to approve for payment the following expenditures:
A&amp;L Steel
Allie Brothers
Alpine Car Wash
Alpine Oil Company
Alpine Pro Hardware
Baxter - Scientific Products Division
B.C. Pizza
Bell Atlantic Business System Services
Brecheisen Diesel Service
B S &amp; A Software
Camera World of Oregon
Cap-Com Paging

74.00
77.75
55.00
183.60
151.84
26.38
17.68
217.60
3,520.26
2,995.00

199.85
59.90

�RFB Cellular, Inc.
City Environmental Services of Northern Michigan
City of Gaylord
CMS Utility Services, Inc.
Consumers Power Company
Deming Hardware
Distel, Okrei &amp; Keskine
Doubleday Bros. &amp; Company
Dubois, Westerman &amp; Cooper
Dunn's Office Supply
Joe FitzGerald
Carquest Auto Parts
Fred Pryor Seminars
Gall's, Inc.
Gaylord Communication &amp; Electronics
Gaylord Flower Shop
Gaylord Opportunity Center, Inc.
Gaylord Steel
GTE North Inc.
Glen's Market
Graham Motor &amp; Generator
H &amp; D, Inc.
Habitec Security
Harrison Piping Supply Company
Herald Times
Holton's LP Gas Company
Huron Valley Laboratories
Hyde Equipment Company
Image Factory
Jack's Well Drilling
Jim's Alpine Auto Inc.
Johnson Oil Company
Joint Building Authority
Matthew E. Kinsinger
KMart
Doug Kussrow
La.Rosa &amp; Company, Inc.
Lawson Products, Inc.
Lurnidor Safety Products
State of Michigan - Corrections Camp Program
Michigan Department of Transportation

MFPA
Michigan Airgas
Michigan Association of Municipal Cemeteries
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
Michiana Auto Radiator

-----

5.61
40.00
140.43
81.48
8,945.70
31.00
500.00
846.41
3,980.62
432.65
38.40
335.60
198.00
425.11
105.00
30.00
335.12
66.66
983.71
269.48
123.20
40.00
106.00
62.00
282.26
27.81
424.00
25.48
27.50
1,080.00
189.84
1,022.83
4,070.00
18.10
358.00
9.70
97.86
77.17
125.92
480.00
36.56
45.00
138.73
20.00
1,314.82
85.00

�Michigan Officeways, Inc.
Mid-North Printing, Inc.
Mid-States Bolt &amp; Screw
Minolta LeasiJ}g Service
Mr. Coots
MSU Extension Office
Municipal Benefit Service
Northeast Radio Engineers
NuWay Computer
Nye Uniform Company
Old Kent Bank of Gaylord
Otsego County Data Processing
Photo Express
Planning &amp; Zoning Center
PPCT Management Systems, Inc.
Prein &amp; Newhof, P.C.
Premarc Corporation
Principal Mutual Life Insurance
RAS Telecom
Rental Uniform Inc.
Rieth-Riley Construction Company
Royal Linen Service
Scientific Brake &amp; Equipment
Statewide Uniforms Inc.
Sure Stop Brake Center
Technichem, Inc.
Thrifty Print of Gaylord
Top O'Michigan Electric Company
Tristar Industries
Varnum, Riddering, Schmidt and Howlett
W &amp;S Distributing, Inc.
Walmart Stores, Inc.
Washtenaw Community College
Wickes Lumber Company
Wilber's Auto Supply
Wolohan Lumber Company

6.23
139.70
71.48
339.83
10.50
25.00
10,848.60
207.50
434.75
151.00
561.38
466.23
145.18
305.00
17.90
664.00
829.51
237.01
165.00
264.88
3,469.20
29.87
229.30
590.00
233.13
51.70
292.50
183.66

86.77
143.40
52.05
13.94
450.00
367.95
188.03
68.59
57,998.39

Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Nelson to adjourn.
Meeting adjourned at 8:10 p.m.
Rebecca Curtis, City Clerk
Ernest Grocock, Mayor

�April 25, 1994
The Regular Meeting of the Gaylord City Council was opened with prayer by Councilman
Warn.bold at 7:00 p,m. on Monday, April 25, 1994, in the City Council Chambers, located
in the City County Building, 225 West Main Street, Gaylord, Michigan. The Pledge of
Allegiance followed the invocation.
Members Present:

Bates, Dunn, Grocock, Mankowski, Nelson, Tholl and Warn.bold.

Members Absent:

None.

Motion by Nelson, supported by Bates to dispense with the reading of the minutes of the
previous meeting and to accept them as presented.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Mr. Jeff Kleinschmidt, Vice President of Grayling State Bank, appeared before City Council
to introduce Grayling State Bank's new C.E.O., Mr. Jim Canary.

City Council publicly congratulated Mr. Dale LaBelle, Wastewater Treatment Plant
Superintendent, for being selected "Michigan Wastewater Treatment Worker of the Year".
City Council is extremely proud of Mr. LaBelle and his accomplishment and appreciate his
outstanding work and dedication to the City of Gaylord.
Motion by Dunn, supported by Wambold to accept the second reading of an amendment
to the City of Gaylord Ordinance Code, Section 21.000 and City of Gaylord Zoning
Ordinance, FARM MARKETS, FLEA MARKETS, TRANSIENT TRADERS, PEDDLERS
AND SOLICITORS. This amendment defines and regulates activities of Farm Markets,
Flea Markets, Transient Traders, Peddlers and Solicitors and provides for an approval and
permitting process. A copy of the amendments may be obtained at the Gaylord City Office.
Ordinance becomes effective May 15, 1994.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Nelson, supported by Mankowski to adopt the "Rules and Regulations for
Farm Markets, Flea Markets, Transient Traders, Peddlers and Solicitors".
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Mankowski, supported by Bates to schedule a public hearing to be held at the
Regular Meeting of May 23, 1994, for the consideration of the 1994/95 Annual Budget and
millage levy.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.

�Motion by Bates, supported by Dunn to approve a request by the Times Coffee Haus for
an Outdoor Cafe Permit at 125 East Main Street from May 1 through September 1, 1994.
The Times Coffee Haus is granted approval contingent upon the Cafe being operated as
presented on its application.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Mankowski, supported by Tholl to approve a request for a Charitable Solicitation
Permit by Clyde Wilks Post #1518 VFW for their annual "Buddy Poppy Flower" sale to be
held May 5 through May 7, 1994.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Nelson to adjourn.
Meeting adjourned at 7:19 p.m.

Rebecca Curtis, City Clerk
Ernest Grocock, Mayor

�May 9, 1994
The Regular Meeting of the Gaylord City Council was opened with prayer by Councilman
Wambold at 7:04 p.m. on Monday, May 9, 1994, in the City Council Chambers, located in
•
the City-County Building,
225 West Main Street, Gaylord, Michigan. The Pledge of
Allegiance followed the invocation.
Members Present: Bates, Dunn, Grocock, Nelson, Tholl and Wambold.
Members Absent:

Mankowski.

Motion by Nelson, supported by Bates to dispense with the reading of the minutes of the
previous meeting and to accept them as presented.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Bates, supported by Nelson to direct the Planning Commission to review and
make recommendations regarding the regulation of oil and gas exploration in the City,
including proposed amendments to the City of Gaylord Zoning Ordinance.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Dunn, supported by Tholl to proclaim the week of May 15, 1994, "National Police
Week" and May 15, 1994 "Police Memorial Day".
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Mr. Barry Cole, candidate for 87th District Judge, appeared before City Council to
introduce himself.
Mayor Grocock solicited names to be considered for appointment to the Downtown
Development Authority. The name of Mr. Doug Madden was submitted.
Motion by Dunn, supported by Tholl to adopt the Notice of Intent Resolution - 1994
Downtown Development Bonds.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Please see separate publication in this paper for "Notice of Intent Resolution" in its entirety.
Motion by Tholl, supported by Wambold to adopt the Resolution Authorizing Certain
Filings With the Michigan Department of Treasury and Authorizing Reimbursement from
Bond Proceeds - 1994 Downtown Development Bonds.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.

�Please see separate publication in this paper for "Resolution Authorizing Certain Filings
With the Michigan Department of Treasury and Authorizing Reimbursement from Bond
Proceeds" in its entirety.

•

Motion by Tholl, supported by Nelson that the Gaylord City Council does hereby approve
the Otsego County Fire Department's request to place a one (1) mill millage levy proposal
to be used for the purpose of purchasing fire equipment, on the August ballot for 1994.
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Tholl, supported by Dunn to approve the following requests for Charitable
Solicitation Permits:
Gaylord-Alpine Chapter 98 of Disabled American Veterans for their annual "ForgetMe-Not" sale to be held July 13 through 15, 1994;
American Legion Post 458 for their annual "Poppy" sale to be held May 26 through
28, 1994; and
St. Judes for their annual Bikathon to be held May 14, 1994
Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Tholl, supported by Bates to approve for payment the following expenditures:
A&amp;L Steel
Ace Tel-A-Tape Inc.
Advance Electric Inc.
Allen Chemical Company
Alpine Car Wash
Alpine Oil Company
Alpine Pro Hardware, Inc.
Bell Atlantic Business System Services
Bozzer Brothers, Inc.
Burn's Electric
Callender &amp; Dornbos, Inc.
Cap-Com Paging
Capital Consultants, Inc.
RFB Cellular, Inc.
Central Commercial Equipment
Gaylord/Otsego Area Chamber of Commerce
City Environmental Services of Northern Michigan
City of Gaylord
Consumers Power Company
Deming Hardware
Jack Doheny Supplies, Inc.

90.86
29.29
15.48
489.50
55.00
221.03
95.87
217.60
87.40
45.00
417.60
59.90
1,415.41
14.35
50.00
39.00
40.00
181.45
9,526.84
94.97
899.40

�Dubois, Westerman and Cooper
Dunn's Office Supply
East Jordan Iron Works
Carquest At]tO Parts
The Framery
Gallery Photo
Gaylord Ford, Inc.
Gaylord Communication &amp; Electronics
Gaylord Flower Shop
Gaylord Opportunity Center, Inc.
Gaylord Steel
GTE North Inc.
Glen's Market
Great Lakes Redi-Mix
Great Lakes Tree Removal
Harrison Piping Supply Company
Herald Times
Holton's LP Gas Company
Huron Valley Laboratories
Hyde Equipment Company
Interstate Battery Inc.
John Jenkins
Jim's Alpine Auto Inc.
Johnson Oil Company
Joint Building Authority
LaRosa &amp; Company, Inc.
Lawson Products, Inc.
Michigan Association of Mayors
Master Dry Carpet Clean
State of Michigan - Corrections Camp Program
Michigan Airgas
Michigan Consolidated Gas Company
Michigan Officeways, Inc.
Mid-States Bolt &amp; Screw
Michigan Municipal League
Minolta Leasing Service
Michigan Police Equipment Company
Otsego County Extension
Municipal Benefit Service
Northern Power Sweeping
NuWay Computer
Old Kent Bank of Gaylord
Otsego County Data Processing Dept.
Otsego County Fair Association

P&amp;S Distributors, Inc.
C.P. Phibrochem

5,319.37
796.98
510.12
140.19
147.32
51.25
63.90
155.00
:15.00
5'75.73
13.32
1,246.93
218.38
141.00
200.00
518.98
315.52
28.73
144.00
166.04
115.90
6.50
103.90
1,022.12
1,462.00
206.56
172.51
50.00
74.00
680.00
42.00
5,460.72
45.97
46.25
90.00
411.04
230.00
10.00
10,848.58
400.00
27.40
106.73
145.31
62.50

52.69
2,227.27

�Photo Express
Pitney Bowes
Petoskey Plastics, Inc.
Principal Mutual
Pure Water, Works, Inc.
Quality Farm &amp; Fleet, Inc.
American Red Cross
Rightsizing Tapes
Royal Linen Service
Scientific Brake &amp; Equipment
Sirchie Fingerprint Labs
Jeffrey A Smetzer
Spartan Sewer &amp; Septic Tank Service
Statewide Uniforms Inc.
Stream Spray Sprinkler Service
Teledial America
Thrifty Print of Gaylord
Top O'Michigan Electric
Triple M Tire Inc.
Tristar Industries
Upper Lakes Tire Distributors, Inc.
U.S. Postoffice
W&amp;S Distributing, Inc.
Wade-Trim Engineering
Wickes Lumber Company
Wilber's Auto Supply
Wolohan Lumber Company
Xerox Corporation
Zaremba Equipment, Inc.

69.38
56.25
818.28
237.01
319.00
540.72
260.00
30.00
33.66
94.10
111.01
118.00
255.00
590.00
461.60
48.86
244.00
165.78
301.98
83.95
6.50
263.15
50.00
345.00
193.73
126.62
38.94
97.50
74.73
55,008.41

Ayes: Unanimous. Motion carried.
Motion by Nelson to adjourn.
Meeting adjourned at 7:42 p.m.
Rebecca Curtis, City Clerk
Ernest Grocock, Mayor

�BANNER SIGN APPLICATION

APPLICANT

Name:
Business Address:

Size of Sign:
Placement of Sign:
Length of Placement:
Verbage of Sign:
CITY MANAGER

Approved:

Date To Be Removed By:
Comments:

City Manager's Signature

Dated

Denied:

�APPLICATION FOR APPOINTMENT TO CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OR
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS

NAME:

ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE NUMBER:

AGE:

OCCUPATION:
NUMBER OF YEARS OF RESIDENCE IN CITY:
WHAT BOARD WOULD YOU BE INTERESTED IN SERVING UPON:

WHY:

PERSONAL COMMENTS:

SIGNATURE OF APPLICANT

DATE

�■

CITY OF GAYLORD
APPLICATION FOR BED AND BREAKFAST

NAME OF APPLICANT, OWNER
ADDRESS
CITY

-------------------------AM APPLYING FOR A LICENSE FOR A

I,

BED AND BREAKFAST, LOCATION AT
STREET AND NUMBER
I HAVE READ THE ORDINANCE AND UNDERSTAND THAT I MUST MEET CERTAIN
REQUIREMENTS tN ORDER FOR THE CITY OF GAYLORD TO ISSUE A LICENSE.
I AM THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY AND WILL RESIDE THERE FULL TIME
WHILE THE LICENSE IS IN AFFECT.
I FURTHER UNDERSTAND THAT THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS NEEDED BY
ME WITH THIS APPLICATION:
1.
2.

3.

4.

County minimum building permit
Lot size, building diagram of home in l/8th inch scale
and number of parking spaces located on the property
No application will be approved until the building and
property is reviewed and inspected by the Building
Inspector, Police Chief and/or the City Manager for
compliance with the standards of the respective
departments
The license is nontransferable

FEES:
INITIAL APPLICATION FEE

$100.00

ANNUAL RENEWAL FEE

$ 50.00

. ,.

I agree to an on site inspection as needed.

OWNER'S SIGNATURE
If a Company or Corporation, please list the name of officers and
the owner in residence.

--

- --- · - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

OWNER'S NAME

OFFICER'S NAME

OFFICER'S NAME

cc:

County of Otsego, Building and Zoning
City of Gaylord, Assessor

�BED AND BREAKFAST ORDINANCE
DEFINITION:
BED AND BREAKFAST - A single family structure in which lodging
and a morning meal are provided for compensation primarily to
transients and for periods not to exceed fourteen (14) days and
nights.
BED AND BREAKFAST OPERATIONS AND REGULATIONS:
a.

No person or entity shall operate a Bed and Breakfast as
defined without having obtained a license as herein
provided. These regulations shall not apply to hotels,
motels, motor lodges, boarding houses, or rooming houses
doing business within the City of Gaylord.

b.

The annual fees for a Bed and Breakfast license shall be
established by the Gaylord City Council. Fees shall be
payable for the whole or any part of a year and shall be
paid at the City offices. Applicants for a license to
operate a Bed and Breakfast shall complete and submit an
application and shall submit a floor plan of the single
family dwelling unit that illustrates that the proposed
operation will comply with the terms of this ordinance and
any others applicable City Codes and Ordinances.

c.

Bed and Breakfast operations shall be confined to the single
family dwelling unit which is the principal dwelling unit on
the property. Parking provided for a Bed and Breakfast
operation shall be in compliance with all City Codes and
Ordinances pertaining to parking regulations. No premises
shall be utilized for a Bed and Breakfast operation unless
the following conditions are met:

d.

1.

Minimum Exits: There shall be at least two (2) exits
to the outdoors from such premises.

2.

Size of Sleeping Rooms: Rooms utilized for sleeping
shall have a minimum size of one hundred (100) square
feet for two (2) occupants with an additional thirty
(30) square feet for each additional occupant to a
maximum of four (4) occupants per room.

3.

Smoke Detectors: Each sleeping room used for the Bed
and Breakfast operation shall have a separate smoke
detector alarm, installed in accordance with the
applicable building codes.

4.

Lavatory Facilities:
Lavatory and bathing facilities
shall be available to all persons using any Bed and
Breakfast operation.

The dwe11·ng unit in which the Bed and Breakfast is located
shall oe
1e principal residence of the operator , and said
operator shall l i ve on the premises when the Bed and
..1!
ik•c,,,.. .r·r·-r t~ .1 L:C "'r"".1Vc&gt;
I , addition, the Bed and
Breakfast operation shall meet the Lollowing conditions:

1.

A Bed and Breakfast operation sha ll be limited to five
(5) sleeping rooms for use in the Bed and Breakfast
operation.

2.

Guest Register: Every operator shall keep a list of
the names of all persons staying at the Bed and
Breakfast operation. The guest register shall be
available for inspection by City officials at any time.

3•

Length of Stay: The maximum stay for any occupant of
the Bed and Breakfast sleeping rooms shall be fourteen
(14) consecutive days and nights.

�4.

Public Nuisance: Bed and Breakfast operation shall not
be permitted whenever the operation endangers, or
offends or interferes with the safety or rights of
others so as to constitute a public nuisance.

e.

No license shall be issued for a Bed and Breakfast operation
at a dwelling unit located within five hundred (500) feet of
an existing licensed Bed and Breakfast operation.

f.

The City of Gaylord shall issue a license for a Bed and
Breakfast operation if the City finds that the applicant can
meet all requirements of this ordinance and of any other
applicable local, state or federal regulation.
If the City
finds that an applicant cannot meet a particular requirement
of these licensing requirements, then the Ci ty shall have
the authority to deny the applicant a license. The denial
may be appealed to the City Council, wh i ch may then weigh
the facts of the case and make a final decision.

g.

Any license issued hereunder shall be valid for a period of
one (1) year from the date of issuance. The City may renew
the license for any Bed and Breakfast ope ration provided
that the licensed operation shall meet the following
conditions:
1.

The Bed and Breakfast operation shall meet all
conditions of this ordinance as confirmed by an annual
inspection of the premises by the City.

2.

The license for the Bed and Breakfast operation shall
not have lapsed for more than thirty (30) days beyond
its expiration date.

3.

The active operation of the Bed and Breakfast shall not
have lapsed for more than nine (9) months.

h.

A Bed and Breakfast license may be renewed only as provided
in Section g. above.
Such license shall not be transferable
to any property other than the property for which it was
approved.

i.

The City shall have the authority to refuse to renew a
license or to suspend or revoke a license for continued and
repeated violations of the provisions of this ordinance. A
decision to suspend, revoke, or refuse renewal of a
license, may be appealed to the City Council by the
applicant. Any license issued under the provisions of this
ordinance may be revoked by the City Council for good cause
shown after investigation and opportunity to the holder of
such license to be heard in opposition thereto; in such
investigation the compliance or non-compliance with the
State law and local ordinances, the conduct of the licensee
i n 1.c gard to the public, and o t her consicleration shall be
we ighed in determination of such issues.

J.

A1l'':l 1-1e1 son violat._r_ J

t. c.

l:-'

.,, •

._;::-:...1.,

,r._

c~

t.~us

ordinance shall

be guilty of a misdemeanor.

OFF STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS:
a.

Bed and Breakfast:
rooms.

One parking space for each two sleeping

�APPLICATION FOR DRIVEWAY PERMIT

Property Owner Name
Business Name (If Applicable)
Address
Telephone Number
Address of Drive Construction
Drive Way Width
Surface material to be used in construction of drive (from edge of
street to property line).
Contractor
Name
Address
t
Telephone Number
Date of Proposed Construction
I hereby certify that I have completed this application to the best
of my knowledge.
I agree to furnish a detailed sketch of the
proposed construction at the time the application is filed to the
City Clerk which displays the location and width of drive.
I am
aware the City Manager will determine if a ditch culvert is needed.
If deemed necessary I agree to the construction of a ditch culvert
at the City Manager's specifications.
Applicant's Signature

Date

Contractor's Signature

Date

(Below to be completed by authorized City Staff)
Recommended for Issuance
Not Recommended for Issuance
Comments: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

- - - - - - - - - -- - -

- - - - - - -- - - - - - PERMIT

A permit for drive~ay construc~ion.is grante~ in accord~n~e with the
conditions stated in the "Application for Driveway Permit. If
applicant hires a contractor for drive~ay constructio~, the
applicant and contractor are both considered the permit holder.
Property Owner
Construction Address
Authorized Signature

Date

�City of Gaylord
225 West Main Street, Room 109
Gaylord, MI 49735
Telephone: (517) 732-2815
Fax: (517) 732-8266

~
CJAYL0N.'.O

CJtt!+! W'ditlM)

1994 GAYLORD AREA VENDOR
INFORMATION SHEET

Name:
Home Address:

Telephone Number:

LIST ALL ITEMS OR TYPE OF PRODUCE WHICH WILL BE SOLD (Please be very
specific):

******************************************************************************

CITY OF GAYLORD
Approved By:
Title:
Date:
Expiration Date:

�City of Gaylord
225 West Main Street, Room 109
Gaylord, Ml 49735
Telephone: (517) 732-2815
Fax: (517) 732-8266

Gl;)
O.AYL0R.O

CJ mt; ffl'b i®3

APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT
APPLICANT NAME:

ADDRESS:

TELEPHONE NUMBER:
TYPE OF SIGN:
HOW MAY LINEAL FEET OF THE PRIMARY FRONT OF THE BUILDING THE BUSINESS
OCCUPIES:

IS SIGN ILLUMINATED AND HOW?
PROHIBITED.

FLASHING OR INTERMITTENT LIGHTS ARE

SIGN DIMENSIONS:
SQUARE FOOTAGE OF SIGN:
OVERALL HEIGHT OF SIGN:
LOCATION OF SIGN ON PROPERTY (IF FREE STANDING, PLEASE INCLUDE SETBACK
DISTANCE FROM PROPERTY LINES):

NUMBER, TYPE AND SIZE OF EXISTING SIGNS LOCATED ON PROPERTY:

�City of Gaylord
225 West Main Street, Room 109
Gaylord, Ml 49735
Telephone: (517) 732-2815
Fax: (517) 732-8266

CJ&amp;)
GAYLOR.O

CUM! MW ttt

APPLICATION FOR SIGN PERMIT

IN THE SPACE PROVIDED BELOW PLEASE SKETCH YOUR PROPOSED SIGN(S).
PLEASE INCLUDE DIMENSIONS AND WORDING TO BE USED.

Applicant Signature

Date

******************************************************************************
BELOW SECTION TO BE COMPLETED BY CITY

DATE ISSUED:
PERMIT NUMBER:
ISSUED BY:
COMMENTS:

�APPLICATION FOR FENCE PERMIT

NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER:
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER:

PHONE NUMBER:
PROPERTY ADDRESS THAT FENCE IS TO BE CONSTRUCTED UPON (IF
DIFFERENT THAN ABOVE):

TYPE OF FENCE TO BE CONSTRUCTED:
PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS:
COLOR OF PROPOSED FENCE:
FENCE HEIGHT:

PRIMARY FRONT
SIDE YARD

REAR YARD

•

PLEASE ATTACH A DRAWING WHICH DETAILS THE POSITION OF THE
PROPOSED FENCE IN RELATION TO BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, EXISTING
FENCES AND PROPERTY LINES. PLEASE INCLUDE ALL MEASUREMENTS AND
A DETAILED SKETCH OF THE TYPE OF FENCE TO BE CONSTRUCTED.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE RECEIVED AND READ A COPY OF THE
CITY OF GAYLORD FENCE ORDINANCE.

SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER

DATE

�City of Gaylord
2~5 West Main Street, Room 109
Gaylord, MI 49735
Telephone: (517) 732-2815
Fax: (517) 732-8266

~
ClAYL0R'D

CJ ttf;i HH4'4111:!&gt;

GAYLORD AREA FARMER'S MARKET 1994
PRODUCERS INFORMATION SHEET

Name:
Home Address:

Telephone Number:
Address Where Produce Grown If Not Same As Above:

County:
LIST ALL ITEMS OR TYPE OF PRODUCE WHICH WILL BE SOLD (Please be very
specific):

******************************************************************************

CITY OF GAYLORD
Approved By:
Title:
Date:

�GAYLORD AREA FARMER'S MARKET 1994
PRODUCERS INFORMATION SHEET
Type Of Structure(s) or Vehicle(s) To Be Used To Sell Produce:

How Will Parking Be Provided For Customer Use:

Does Property Have Adequate Entrance and Exit:
I certify that I have received and reviewed the market rules and regulations and a copy of
the Gaylord Ordinance Code regulating my proposed activities and agree to comply with
same.
Producer's Signature

Property Owner's Name:
Address of Property to Be Used:
Property Owner's Signature
REFERENCES:
This is to certify that I personally know this grower and that he/she has grown all the
produce listed on this application to be sold. I am not a relative of the applicant.
Signature of Reference

Signature of Reference

Street Address

Street Address

City, Zip Code

City, Zip Code

Telephone Number

Telephone Number

�TEMPORARY SIGN APPLICATION

APPLICANT
Name:
Business Address:

Size/Type of Sign:
Placement of Sign:
Length of Placement:
Verbage of Sign:
CITY MANAGER
Approved:

Date To Be Removed By:
Comments:

City Manager's Signature

Dated

Denied:

�REQUEST FOR SIGN VARIANCE
NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER:
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER:

PHONE:
BUSINESS NAME (IF APPLICABLE):
PROPOSED VARIANCE ADDRESS:
ZONING DISTRICT:

TAX ID NUMBER:

PROPOSED SIZE ' AND VERBAGE OF SIGN (ATTACH BLUEPRINT):

PROPOSED TYPE OF SIGN:
PROPOSED SIGN TO BE ILLUMINATED:
NUMBER/TYPE OF CURRENT IDENTITY SIGNS:

A.
TO OBTAIN A NONUSE VARIANCE THE APPLICANT MUST SHOW
"PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY" BY DEMONSTRATING THE FOLLOWING.

1.

EXPLAIN WHY THIS IS NOT A SELF-CREATED PROBLEM. A SELF
CREATED HARDSHIP IS NOT A VALID BASIS FOR A VARIANCE.

2.

EXPLAIN WHY WOULD STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH AREA SETBACKS,
FRONTAGE HEIGHTS, BULK OR DENSITY WOULD UNREASONABLY
PREVENT THE OWNER FROM USING THE PROPERTY FOR A
PERMITTED PURPOSE.

�3.

EXPLAIN WHY THE VARIANCE WOULD DO SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE TO
THE APPLICANT AS WELL AS TO OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE
DISTRICT OR WHY WOULD A LESSER RELAXATION GIVE
SUBSTANTIAL RELIEF AND BE MORE CONSISTENT WITH JUSTICE
TO OTHERS.

4.

EXPLAIN WHY THE PLIGHT OF THE APPLICANT IS DUE TO THE
"UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES" OF THE PROPERTY. WHAT ARE THESE
CIRCUMSTANCES?

B. THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MUST INSURE THAT THE "SPIRIT OF
THE ORDINANCE IS OBSERVED, PUBLIC SAFETY SECURED AND
SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE DONE".

VARIANCE REQUEST:

NAME OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE:

I, THE ABO VE MENTIONED PROPERTY OWNER, DOH..._.~-~~ C

.,,___,_-.1..~E

--==-------~ ABOVE FACTS TO BE TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I ALSO .,.._,,_,,._.........-..::.._ _,__
UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE COST TO PUBLISH •NOTICE OF
SPECIAL MEETING* OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS IS MY
RESPONSIBILITY AND MUST BE PAID BEFORE HEARING DATE.
I HAVE
RECEIVED A COPY OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS GUIDELINES FOR

DECISION MAKING AND A COPY OF THE CITY OF GAYLORD ZONING
ORDINANCE.
SIGNED THIS

-------

OF

SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER
APPROVED:
MEETING DATE:

DENIED:

�CITY OF GAYLORD
APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT

Applicant's Name:
Address:

Telephone No.:
I hereby request a Special Use Permit.

1.

Describe the nature of the special use:

2.

Indicate the property which is the subject of the special use request:

3.

Indicate the District in which the subject property is located:
R-1 Single-Family Residence
R-2 Multiple Residence
C-1 General Commercial

C-2 Central Commercial
M-1 Manufacturing

Date:

Signature:

APPLICATION NOTE:

Each application must be submitted to the City Planning Commission together
with a fee of $25.00 (payable to the City of Gaylord). Furthermore, each
application shall be accompanied by at least one of the following:
1) accurate site plan; 2) plot plan; 3) building development plan;
4) sketch; or 5) program of development.
In addition, the City Planning
Commission may require other related material and other information required
by the Planning Commission and the City Zoning Ordinance, Section 13.
Special Use Regulations.

�REQUEST FOR VARIANCE
NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER:
ADDRESS OF PROPERTY OWNER:

PHONE:
BUSINESS NAME (IF APPLICABLE):
PROPOSED VARIANCE ADDRESS:
ZONING DISTRICT:

TAX ID NUMBER:

PROPOSED BUILDING/ADDITION SIZE (ATTACH BLUEPRINT):

PARKING SPACES:

PROPOSED

BUILDING SETBACK (FEET):

REQUIRED
FRONT

-----

SIDE

REAR

-----

SIDE

-----

To CONFORM WITH ESTABLISHED BUILDING LINE:

A. TO OBTAIN A NONUSE VARIANCE THE APPLICANT MUST SHOW A
PRACTICAL DIFFICULTY BY DEMONSTRATING THE FOLLOWING.
0

0

1.

EXPLAIN WHY THIS IS NOT A SELF-CREATED PROBLEM. A SELF
CREATED HARDSHIP IS NOT A VALID BASIS FOR A VARIANCE.

2.

EXPLAIN WHY WOULD STRICT COMPLIANCE WITH AREA SETBACKS ,
FRONTAGE HEIGHTS, BULK OR DENSITY WOULD UNREASONABLY
PREVENT THE OWNER FROM USING THE PROPERTY FOR A
PERMITTED PURPOSE.

�3.

EXPLAIN WHY THE VARIANCE WOULD DO SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE TO
THE APPLICANT AS WELL AS TO OTHER PROPERTY OWNERS IN THE
DISTRICT OR WHY WOULD A LESSER RELAXATION GIVE
SUBSTANTIAL RELIEF AND BE MORE CONSISTENT WITH JUSTICE
TO OTHERS.

4.

EXPLAIN WHY THE PLIGHT OF THE APPLICANT IS DUE TO THE
"UNIQUE CIRCUMSTANCES" OF THE PROPERTY. WHAT ARE THESE
CIRCUMSTANCES?

B. THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS MUST INSURE THAT THE "SPIRIT OF
THE ORDINANCE IS OBSERVED, PUBLIC SAFETY SECURED AND
SUBSTANTIAL JUSTICE DONE".
VARIANCE REQUEST :

NAME OF AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE:

I, THE ABOVE MENTIONED PROPERTY OWNER, DO HEREBY CERTIFY THE
ABOVE FACTS TO BE TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE.
I ALSO
UNDERSTAND AND AGREE THAT THE COST TO PUBLISH "NOTICE OF
SPECIAL MEETING" OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS IS MY
RESPONSIBILITY AND MUST BE PAID BEFORE HEARING DATE.
I HAVE
RECEXV~D
C-0~ O~"THE LONIRG OARD F PPEAt:S U~DELINES F
DECXSXON MAKING AND A COPY OF THE CITY OF GAYLORD ZONING
ORDINANCE.
SIGNED THIS _ _ _ _ _ _ _ OF

SIGNATURE OF PROPERTY OWNER
APPROVED:
MEETING DATE:

DENIED:

�•

I

,

CITY OF GAYLORD
ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS
ZONING VARIANCE REVIEW LIST
NON-USE VARIANCES
RESPONSE

FINDING

1.

Is THE PARCEL UNIQUE (IN TERMS OF SIZE,
SHAPE, TOPOGRAPHY, LOCATION, on NATURAL
FEATURES) WHEN COMPARED TO OTHER PARCELS
IN THE SAME ZONING CLASSIFICATION? • • •
.
DESCRillE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

... ....

2.

3.

CAN THE PARCEL REASONAllLY DE USED J:N A
MANNER CONSISTENT WITH THE REQUIREMENTS
OF THE ZONING ORDINANCE? • • • • • • • •
DESCRIDE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

.

Is THE VARIANCE REQUEST THE RESULT OF
SELF-CREATED ACTIONS ON THE PART OF THE
APPLICANT? • . • • . • . • • • . . . . .

5.

..

NO

YES *NO

IF THE VARIANCE IS GRANTED, WOULD THE
APPLICANT llE GIVEN A RIGHT OR PRIVILEGE

. . . . . .
NOT ENJOYED llY NEIGHllORING PROPERT1.ES? •
DESCRillE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

4.

*YES

.

. . . . . .

WILL THE VARIANCE INJURE OR DAMAGE
NEIGHDORING PROPERTIES (WILL IT RESULT
IN HAZARDS FROM FIRE, FLOOD, LIGHTS,
TRAFFIC CONGESTION, ETC)? • • • • • , • • • • • • • • •
0ESCRIDE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

I

I

I

I

YES *NO

I
I

YES *NO

I

I

I

I

YES *NO

�:,

6.

!s

THE VARIANCE llEING REQUESTED DECAUSE OF
PERSONAL OR ECONOMIC HARDSHIP RATHErt THAN
THE UNIQUE PHYSICAL SITUATION OF TIIIS

PARTICULAR PROPERTY? • • • • .• • • • • • • •

.. .

. . .

.

I

I

YES *NO

I

DESCRIDE: _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __

I

7.

DOES THE VARIANCE CONSTITUTE THE MINIMUM
ACTION NECESSARY TO PERMIT REASONAOLE USE
OF THE LAND AND DUILDINGS? • • • • • • • •
DESCRillE:

. ...

...

I

J_ _.__
*YES

I
_._I

NO

-----------------------

1,

NOTE: * -

INDICATES APPROPRIArE RESPONSE.

ATTACHMENT OF CONDITIONS
IF THE VARIANCE IS APPROVED, SHOULD CONDITIONS DE ATTACHED TO THE
APPROVAL? IF SO, LIST. (NOTE: ARE THE CONDITIONS TO DE ATTACHED DASED
ON STANDARDS PROVIDED FOR IN THE ORDINANCE?)
A)

8)

C)

D)
E)

MOTION
THE MOTION SHOULD STATE:

1.

2.

3.

THE FINDINGS OF FACT.
THE ACTION TAKEN DY THE ZDA.
ANY CONDITIONS THAT WILL OE APPLIED.

·····························--··-·
THE REVIEW LIST IS NOT TO OE CONSTRUED AS A LEGAL :INSTRUMENT RELATIVE
TO THE APPROVAL/DENIAL OF A VARIANCE.
IT IS TO SERVE AS A GUIDE TO

THE TYPES OF INFORMATION REQUIRED DY THE ZOA AS PART OF THE
DECISION MAKING PROCESS.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008312">
                <text>Gaylord_Meeting-Minutes-and-Materials_1993-1994</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008313">
                <text>Gaylord Zoning Board of Appeals</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008314">
                <text>Gaylord City Planning Commission</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008315">
                <text>Gaylord City Council</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008316">
                <text>1993-1994</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008317">
                <text>Meeting Minutes and Materials</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008318">
                <text>The Meeting Minutes and Materials comprises of meeting minutes from the Gaylord Zoning Board of Appeals, the Gaylord City Planning Commission, and the Gaylord City Council, from 1993-1994. Included are forms related to items discussed in the meetings.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008319">
                <text>Minutes and proceedings</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008320">
                <text>Gaylord (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008321">
                <text>Otsego County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008322">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008324">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008325">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008326">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008327">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038326">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54700" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58971">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/df2cb1ac38ec0d3bbe78ba9258946db2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2ddd483c73d1cc874c7fbe1f4c66c6fd</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008311">
                    <text>�A Final Report Upon
THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
Gaylord, Michigan

Prepared for the
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
AND THE CITY COUNCIL

The preparation of this report was financially aided
through a Federal grant from the Urban Renewal Administration of the Department of Housing and Urban Development under the Urban Planning Assistance Program
authorized by Section 701 of the Housing Act of 1954,
as amended, administered by the Michigan Department
of Commerce.

By
Harland Bartholomew and Associates
Planners, Engineers and Landscape Architects
Saint Louis, Missouri

May, 1966

�'
'
'•
•
"-

HARLAND BARTHOLOMEW AND ASSOCIATES
PLANNER~

f:NGINEERS · LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

1030

PIERCE

BUILDING

112 NORTH FOURTH STREET

SAINT LOUIS
GARFIELD

1·2107

2,

CABLE

MISSOURI
ADL'ftUS

HARPLAN

May, 1966
City Planning Commission
and City Council
Gaylord, Michigan
Gentlemen:
In accordance with our agreement, we are pleased to submit this final report on the Comprehensive Plan for the City
of Gaylord.

~ ·

The plan calls attention to the many opportunities of
Gaylord and provides an agreed upon program of community action essential to the implementation of the plan. This report contains all of the supporting data, information, and
maps as amended or modified, that have been presented in previous reports and meetings.
In the coming years, the plan must be kept up to date
with appropriate revisions and periodic re-evaluation so that
it may be closely related to the changing conditions in the
community. This report, once adopted as the plan for Gaylord,
will mark the beginning of a continuous planning program directed toward improving the community while creating the best
possible environment for its residents.
The preparation of this plan has been a most interesting
and challenging endeavor. Our association with the city, its
officials, and residents has been an enjoyable experience. We
would like to express our appreciation to the many people who
have generously contributed their time and effort to the development of the plan.
Respectfully submitted,

HA7~J::;

I
I
I
I

By

ST. LOUIS

ATLANTA

Malcolm C. Drummond
Associate Partner

MEMPHIS

WASHINGTON

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

. . . . . . . .. . . ... . . . . ..
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COMMUNITY • • • • • • • • • • . •
Historical Background • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . .
Geographic Location • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . .
Economic Background • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • . .

3
3
5
5

LAND USE PLAN • • • • • •
• • • • • • • • • • • • •
Existing Land Use Pattern • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Dwelling Unit Distribution • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Future Land Use Needs • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Land Use Plan • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

11
11
15
15
16

THOROUGHFARE PLAN. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Present Street System • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Traffic Patterns • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Proposed Thoroughfare Plan • • • • • • • • • • • • •

21
21
23
24

THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Land Use Pattern. •
• •••••••••••••
Street Pattern • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Parking Facilities • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Development Plan for the Business District • • • • •

27
27
28
29
33

INTRODUCTION. •

I
I
I

1

. .. . .. . . .
. ... .

• 37
COMMUNITY FACILITIES • • • • • • • •
• 37
Existing Community Facilities • •
. .
Community Facilities Plan • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 40

. .

REGULATORY MEASURES • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 45
Zoning Regulations. • • • • • • • • • •
• • • • 45
Subdivision Regulations • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 50

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

.. ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... .• .•

. .

PUBLIC UTILITIES • • • • • •
Existing Facilities • • • •
Future Requirements • • • •

• 53
• 53
• 55

CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Present Municipal Finances • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Proposed Capital Improvement Program • • • • • • • •
Cost of the Program • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •

57
57
64
69

PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Coordination of Public Improvements • • • • • • • • •
Guidance of Private Development • • • • • • • • • • •
Public Understanding and Support • • • • • • • • • •
Planning Commission Program • • • • • • • • • • • • •
City Council Program • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Planning Commission Policies and Procedures • • • • •

71
72
73
74
75
76
77

�INDEX TO PLATES
Plate
1
2
3
4
5
6

7
8
9

••

10

Land Use - 1965. • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Distribution of Dwelling Units - 1965 and 1985.
Land Use Plan - 1985 • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Traffic Flow - 1965 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Major Street Plan • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
General Standards for Major Thoroughfares • • • •
Business District Plan • • • ~ • • • • • • • • •
Community Facilities Plan • • • • • • • • • • • •
Zoning District Map • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Areas Served by Sewer and Water Systems • • • • •

11
15
16
23
25
25
33
40
48
55

-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

INDEX TO TABLES
Table
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10
11
12
13
14

Economic Characteristics. • • • • • • • • • • •
Population Trends and Projections. • • • • •
Existing Land Use in Gaylord • • • • • • • • • •
Land Use and Population Ratios • • • • • • • • •
Future Land Use Requirements. • • • •
• ••
Existing Major Street Data • • • • • • • • • • •
Percentage of Vehicles Parking by Time Periods.
Existing and Proposed Community Facilities • • .
Municipal Revenues • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Municipal Expenditures • • • • • • • • •
• •
Trends in Assessed Values • • • • • • • . • • • •
Estimated Bonding Limits • • • • • • • • • • • •
Trends in Tax Rates • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Proposed Six-Year Capital Improvement Program • •

4
8
12
14
19
22
30
43
58
59
61
62
63
68

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

r

GAYLOR.D

I
C.
~

0

z.

"'

-.....J

I
I
I

us

-~

GE

II

•

t1

c;~N

1=-

G~A HIC

,...,.,.c.
l'.\lY
u o~ 11-1{

TH( Jl( ...... Al ()N Of 1~ MM...,,. ~
AIDI0 lNt..OUCiH A. fl OUAl GVN l

UUA"i l( N[WAt 1' 0 1,,l!N~ llAl iO N ~ l ti .oOu';·
~ ANO HOM( l lh ,."1( 1 AG! N(• U,,,Ix l I"( !JI·
IN" ' I ANN ING -' '&gt;~l AN (I " CX, f l'IJ ,',..Jl,&lt;()f
IHO 1Y ~ (ll()N }01 OJ l ot!
~,t,,(, ,._-, OI
19'&gt; ' A\ AMI ND(0

HAl tA JIO IA l1H0l0 1t11 l W ANO AU0( 1A1U
L lt • f l ,. •• l l.L
IA• • I IOVl1

Cl• •l l • 6 •• 1f l.l. l• " Dl( Nl"l( ot •t lC11
... ...
, 110 ... 11

+•"

..

�I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

I
I

INTRODUCTION
Gaylord is a growing community in the center of a rapidly
developing area.
Increased trade activity and industrial development are expected to accompany this growth. The present
population of 2,600 persons is expected to increase to nearly
5,000 persons of permanent population by 1985. The Comprehensive Plan contemplates considerable development in the surrounding areas represented by continuous development of summer
homes, resorts and recreational facilities.
The Comprehensive Plan is designed to guide this growth
in Gaylord during the next 20 years. The major purpose of the
plan is to fully capitalize on the community's potential.
Gaylord, as the center of a growing tourist area, is advantageously located in relation to major metropolitan centers. The
area possesses resources in access and transportation, in industrial sites, and in a well-established residential and commercial center. The area should be able to successfully compete
with other communities in other counties for these developments.
If the community develops without proper planning and services,
the haphazard result could gradually discourage new growth. On
the other hand, a well-designed and efficient community can
assure a promising future and attract new growth.
Satisfactory living and working conditions in Gaylord are
essential to its growth if it is to achieve its potential as a
city of 5,000 in the center of a growing area.
These optimum
conditions cannot be obtained by providing public improvements
to the expediency of the moment or by allowing all private development to take place at the whim of the individual. There
must be a publicly accepted, overall comprehensive plan to coordinate all public improvements and to direct private development. By using the plan as a guide, duplications, waste and
lessened standard developments can be avoided. Gaylord has
had many changes in the past and will continue to change in
the future.
The plan should serve as a guide for these inevitable modifications to direct the building of new homes, new
plants, new businesses, and expanding community facilities.
The plan calls for the development of an improved central
business district, a large highway-oriented commercial area,
an industrial complex along the Interstate Highway, new residential areas to the north and southeast, a new elementary
school, several park areas, and a new city-county building,
all coordinated for the development of a modern community.
The Comprehensive Plan for Gaylord is primarily concerned
with physical improvements, public facilities in the form of

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I
I

-

2 -

streets, highways, airport facilities, parking lots, public
buildings, schools, parks, sanitary and storm sewers, water
lines and private developments such as the use of land, construction of buildings, division of · land and the appearance
and maintenance of property. Public improvements are directed
by a thoroughfare plan, a community facilities plan, and the
like. Private improvements are controlled by zoning, subdivision,building, and other regulatory ordinances and by the land
use plan. These plans and regulations "are : the basic components
of the Comprehensive Plan.

�II

-I
I

-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I

-

3 -

CHARACTERISTICS OF THE COMMUNITY
Historical Background
Gaylord was organized as a village in 1881 and incorporated as a city in 1921. Gaylord has always been progressive in the provision of public services, as evidenced by its
development of a public water distribution system almost f rom
the very start. The courthouse was built in 1891, the first
electricity arrived in 1897, the first streets were paved in
1921, and the sewer system was started in 1933. The only bank
in Otsego County was founded in Gaylord in 1893.
The first railroad line from the south reached Otsego
Lake Village in May, 1873, and Gaylord in July, 1873. With
the advent of the railroad, the lumbering activity greatly increased since it was possible to ·transport much greater quantities of lumber. The pine lumbering activity soon reached
its peak and then was nearly depleted by 1890. The first industry, other than saw mills, to come to Gaylord was the Detroit
Iron and Furnace Company. This - company built two charcoal kilns
north of Gaylord sometime prior to 1890, however, they ceased
production in 1896. The Dayton Last Block Works was started in
1891. This industry used maple lumber for ten pins and blocks
and was a major industry for a number of years; employing about
30 people. The company went out of business about 1931. The
Jackson and Wylie Company of Saginaw, a hoop and stay mill, was
also started about 1890 and continued in business until about
1915.
In 1905, an east-west railroad from Boyne City to Alpena
with a daily total of four passe-n ger trains, in addition to the
freight trains, came to Gaylord. During the period from 1910
to 1915, there were 14 passenger · trains stopping at Gaylord
each day.
Industry was also active in the period shortly after the
turn of the century. The Gaylord Manufacturing Company, specialists in the manufacture of wagons and logging sleighs,
operated from approximately 1900 to 1915 and reached its peak
about 1908. An automobile factory manufacturing the "Gaylord
3ry• started about 1910, but was in business only for a few
years.
The Saginaw Wood Products Company operated from about
1915 to 1922. The 1930's saw little development in the area;
however, in 1941 both the Higgins Industry, Incorporated and
the Hidden Valley Ski Club · came to Gaylord.
In 1945, the
Standard Products Company located in Gaylord and the 0. W.
Rowley Company was established in the area.

�-

4 -

Table 1
ECONOMIC CHARACTERISTICS
Gaylord, Michigan

•
•
•
•

Retail Trade - 1963 - Gaylord
Establishments • • • • • . • • • . • 76 (62 with payroll)
Retail Sales • • . • .
• • • . • • • . • • $10,587,000
Payroll • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • $1,041,000
Selected Services - 1963 - Gaylord
Establishments • • • • •
• • • • 46 (22 with payroll)
Sales . . . . . . . . . . . • • •
• • • • • $819,000
Payroll • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • • • $164,000
Wholesale Trade - 1963 - Otsego County
Establishments. • • • • • • • • • •
• . . • • . • 23
Sales • • • . • • • • • • • • • • • . • • • • $9,600,000
Payroll • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • $412,000

=
•
•I

•I
I
I
I

Manufacturing - 1958 - Otsego County
Establishments • • • • • • • .
Value Added by Manufacturing.

..

. . . . . . . . 18
• . • • $3,548,000

Agriculture - 1959 - Otsego County
Land in Farms • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • 69,000 acres
Number of Farms • • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • . • 288
Total Value of Farm Products Sold • • • • • • • $643,000
Employment - 1960 - Otsego County
Agriculture, Forestry • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • 212
Construction. . • • •
• • • • . . • • • • • • • • 184
M~nufacturing • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . • • • 579
Transportation, Communications and Utilities.
• • 75
Wholesale and Retail Trade . • • . • • • • . • • . • • 479
Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate • • • • • • • • • 59
Public Administration • • • • • • • • • • . , , • • . 156
Business Services and Miscellaneous . • • . . • • . • 676
2,420
Source:

U. S. Census, 1958, 1959 and 1963

�-

5 -

In recent years, Gaylord has gained distinction as a
year-round tounist and resort center.
Ski resorts operate
in the winter; bunting and fishing facilities are available
throughout the year. The development of summer homes and
resorts on the many nearby lakes has grown steadily.
Geographic Location
Gaylord is strategically located in the northern part on
Michigan's lower peninsula on Interstate Highway 75, the main
north-south highway in the state, and on Michigan Highway 32,
an important east-west road.
Gaylord is within or close to a
70 mile radius of a large part of Michigan's tourist area, including Traverse City, Mackinaw City, Alpena and Houghton Lake.
The larger cities of Grand Rapids, Lansing and Flint are within a 150 mile radius, and the major metropolitan areas of
Detroit and Chicago are within a general proximity of 250
miles.
In addition, improved transportation facilities have
placed Gaylord and Otsego County in a favorable location to
attract tourists from such metropolitan centers as Toledo,
Indianapolis, Cincinnati and Louisville.

•
•
•
•
•
•I
I

Because of the area's central location in the northern
part of the lower peninsula, and because of the lack of large
cities in the area, Gaylord serves as a regional trading center for a relatively large area. Because of its favorable
position on a good transportation artery, the Interstate Highway, Gaylord and Otsego County are able to attract tourists
and economically transport manufactured products.
Economic Background
An analysis of the present economy of Otsego County and
a study of future economic development has been developed as
a part of the county plan. This study is contained in a report entitled, "Background for Planning" and essentially includes an economic study of Gaylord. The following section
summarizes the economic background for Gaylord and the area.
Some of the economic characteristics of Gaylord or Otsego
County are shown in Table 1 •
Trading enterprises in Otsego County employ nearly 25
percent of the labor force; most of this employment is located
within or close to the City of Gaylord.
Boasting a total of
76 retail establishments realizing annual sales in excess of
$10,000,000, Gaylord serves as the trading center for Otsego
County and areas in adjoining counties. The Gaylord regional
trade center is in competition with such cities as Traverse
City, East Jordan, Boyne City, Petoskey, Alpena and Grayling.

�- 6 -

Since the area around Gaylord is recognized as a tourist
center, selectedt services are a vital part of the city's economic base. There were 46 service establishments in the City
of Gaylord in 1963 with annual sales in excess of $800,000.
Gaylord also serves as a sub-wholesale trade center with 23
establishments realizing nearly $10,000,000 annually in wholesale sales.

•
•
•
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Although there has been a decrease in the number of farms
and land utilized in farms in recent years, agricultural activities are still an important part of the local economic
base, as evidenced by a 1959 total of 288 farms within -Otsego
County earning $643,000 in farm products sold •
In 1958, the value added by manufacturing through Otsego
County local industries was $3.5 million • . The five major manufacturing companies in the County - Standard Products, Higgins
Industry, O. w. Rowley Company, and Gaylqrd Tool _and Gauge have recently been joined by the U. S. Plywood Corporation,
which employs about 200 persons. By comparing _this situation
with the earlier one described under Historical Background,
the emergence of a much healthier distribution of manufacturing establishments is apparent.
From a low base in 1940, employment in manufacturing in
Gaylord increased by 300 persons to 1950 and increased an
additional 200 persons to 1960. This is attributable in part
to greater manufacturing activity; but probably an equally
important factor has been the growing tourist trade.
While
employment decreases in agriculture and the extractive industries have nearly equalled employment increases in manufacturing, there has been an overall employment increase of just over
50 percent in the 20-year period.
The future economy of the Gaylord area will generally be
an outgrowth of the existing base of the city and the county.
Industrial employment will probably continue to increase in
importance to the economic base.
The county area is still
relatively undeveloped from the standpoint of tourist activity
and summer home development, but is favorably located so as to
have the opportun~~Y to increase these developments.
If Gaylord and Otsego County are to gain new industry, it
will be necessary for leaders of the community to actively engage in competing for new industries. The recently formed
Industrial Development Corporation can do a great deal to further future industrial development within the area. Examples
of the types of industries that could advantageously locate in

�•
•
•
•
•
•I
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

7 -

the area include operations involving the assembly of relatively small products not requiring high transportation costs,
fabrication of 'finished products, and wood-using industries .
It is anticipated that all types of tourist activity will
continue to be an important part of the economy and will continue to see growth in the future; however, most of this
growth will probably occur in the development of new summer
homes.
With increases expected in basic employment and tourist activity, there will be a corresponding increase in retail
trade and selective services.
As Gaylord and Otsego County experience growth, there will
be a corresponding need for additional construction.
Some
growth in the construction and building materials industry may
be expected.
Wholesale trade is already at a relatively high
level of activity and probably cannot be expected to experience
much more growth. There is a possibility of tapping a maple
syrup potential.
There are also lime deposits and at least
limited deposits of natural gas and oil within the county area.
These resources may hold some potential for future development.
Past population growth trends since 1900 for the City of
Gaylord, Otsego County, the state, and the nation are shown
in Table 2. Both the state and the nation have had increases
in population in every decade, though the rate of increase was
the lowest during the 1930's because of the economic depression. Otsego County's growth has fluctuated over the years,
but has steadily been increasing since the 1930's.
The City
of Gaylord has had a steady increase in population also since
1930, and the population has increased from some 1,600 to
2,600 persons during this period of time.
Projections of future population were prepared as a part
of the Otsego Comprehensive Planning Program and are contained
in a report on "Background for Planning". The population of
Otsego County was projected as a relationship to projections
of United Sfates population and State of Michigan population.
Projections for the populations for both the state and the
nation are also shown in Table 2. Based upon several estimates, the·· county Comprehensive Plan indicates a 1985 population in the county of some 11,000 persons of permanent population.
It is also expected that there will be a seasonal
population of 17,400 persons, thus making 28,400 persons the
total year-around equivalent population of the county.
As a part of these county projections, projections were
made for the population for the City of Gaylord.
It is expected that by 1985 the total population of the city will be

�-

8 -

Table 2
POPULATION TRENDS AND PROJECTIONS
Gaylord, Michigan

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Year

United
States
(1,000)

1900

75,995

2,421

6,175

1,561

1910

92,228

2,810

6,552

1,538

1920

106,022

3,668

6,043

1,701

1930

123,202

4,842

5,554

1,627

1940

132,165

5,256

5,827

2,055

1950

151,326

6,372

6,435

2,271

1960

179,323

7,823

7,545

2,568

2,960

1970

214,000 (1) 10,000 (2)

9,000 (3)

3,060

3,650

1980

260,000 (1) 12,500 (2) 10,400 (3)

3,540

4,340

1985

282,000 (1) 14,000 (2) 11,000 (3)

3,740

4,680

(1)
(2)
(3)

State of
Michigan
(1,000)

Otsego
County

City of
Gaylord

Gaylord
Urban Area

Projections by Bureau of Census, Series II Projections.
Interpolation from ORRRC Judgment Projections.
Estimated by Harland Bartholomew and Associates in
"Background for Planning", Otsego County, Michigan.

�II

•
•
•
•
•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

9 -

3,740 persons residing in 1,068 dwelling units (based upon a
population of 3 p5 persons per dwelling unit).
Within the urbanized or planning area of Gaylord (that is, the area bounded
by Congdon, East, McCoy and Murner Roads), there are an additional 592 new dwelling units shown in the distribution of
population plan. Thus, there would be a total of 1,336 dwelling units within the Gaylord planning area by 1985. This results in a projected population of 4,700 persons for the Gaylord
urban area by 1985 •

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

11 ...

LAND USE PLAN
The physical form of a community is the result of the
actions of many individuals and agencies. The buildings and
structures created by private enterprise require supporting
public facilities such as streets, utilities, parks and
schools. The manner in which these public and private improvements are related to one another largely determines the
character of the community.
Proper planning of these relationships results in an orderly, attractive community.
A survey of existing land uses in Gaylord was conducted
in March of 1965, in which every parcel of land in the city
and within the surrounding area was field-checked, classified
and mapped. This was essentially an up-dating of the land use
survey made as a part of the Otsego County planning program.
The eight major categories of land use include single, two and
multiple-family residential, commercial, light and heavy industrial, parks, public and semi-public property, and railroad
properties.
Existing Land Use Pattern
A land use map of the City of Gaylord and the surrounding
a~ea is shown on Plate 1. The land use pattern of Gaylord is
one of fairly uniform development, occupying a relatively large
part of the present corporate area. The largest concentration
of development is located east of Hidden Valley Ski Club, north
of the public golf course, and east of Interstate Highway 27.
There is a relatively sparse pattern of urban development within the environs of Gaylord with residential and commercial uses
scattered along the various state and county highways.
Residential uses occupy the greatest amount of developed
land area within Gaylord. Though the residential pattern is
located fairly uniformly around the central _business district,
new residential developments have been primarily taking place
to the northeast and north.
Scattered residential uses are
found along the highways leading out of the city, primarily
along Michigan 32 and Old Highway 27. The business district
is located at the crossing of M-32 and U. s. Highway 27, generally in the geographic center of the city. This is the
largest concentration of commercial land uses, but smaller
scattered commercial uses are located along the state and
federal highways. The largest concentration of outlying
commercial uses is found south of the city along Old Highway
27. Following completion of the Interstate Highway, a number
of new commercial uses located to the west end of the community along Main Street near the intersection of M-32 and the
Interstate Highway.

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 12 Table 3

•

EXISTING LAND USE IN GAYLORD
Gaylord; . Michigan

Land Use
Classification

Area in
Acres

Single-Family
Residential

Percent of Total
Corporate Area
Compared
Gaylord Cities

*

Percent of
Developed Area
Compared
Gaylord Cities *

. 147.6

14.44

17.10

29.0

34.08

6.1

.60

.. 2. 75

1.2

5.48

Commercial

31.2

· 3. 05

1.58

6.1

3.14

Industrial

23.5

2.29

2.83

4.6

5.65

Railroads

18.8

1.84

2.50

3.7

4.99

Parks

. 2.1

.21

2.55

0.4

5.08

Public and
Semi-Public

122.5

11.99

6.65

23.8

13.25

Streets

159.1

15.57

14.21

31.2

28.33

Two and Multiple
Family Residential

100.00
100.0·

Developed Area

510.9

Vacant Land

511.1

50.01

49.83

17022.0

100.00

100.00

Total Area

* The average of 28 other cities have a
population of less than 50,000.

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
-I

L__,;,._,i
~~~~~~:;
~
~-~
~ ¥-~~·~il--' l ~~i

•~,,;

~• ~

7,

':"Dll/~

~

1
~-\~~
...1//,. "
.,.!..,, ..• -~

~

I):

½J v

1/,

.£"1i,i~ ~

\

·1.\

r

[~

\'·'\-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

~-

"

~

' ~

b

'

' ;,:;

1·,. $½'

S3''

~~l!!'im. . e ~~. . ~ : :~
,~1~~~~l~~ ~E~
~

.,;,~~~~~CJ~

.· .·;,·

. ··, ::;17,j.•.:

/',/: •

'°7-·•:;'
::&gt;~.!;;:; ..: . ··...

~r«

l"':% .··z,;···Y· :.,'· :. ·.··· ::0 .
~

.d.r$.~~

Jj

- J~~,~~-fa_ j ~~- ..... -- ,
l1~\.~\- . ·~~~~-~ f}JZ)§fr~"w--,1
-.li~,\\ .\1 t::i!f
~:
,
·
&lt;
.
'
.
i
l
~.
~
.
.
~~.·.·~.
~.
·
.
r·
.
:
·
.
~
.
~
.
·.:· .·'.·.~,.
t
I,
¾LbJ;~~r5ii&lt;&lt;·.~::&gt;z
1\-=-

~ ~~I

11-,,~,· :·, --·:· .: '.t,··.::.-&gt;~\.,::-.:./

•

1/,

~~ ,.__ »~
I

•

•

11

9

r··.··•·:. . ·.•.:,·:•:·:·:·1·:.•.

,.,
~

~ "•,l__

•

'

•

~

&gt;or, .._.,••~

•.i,..,.,.,,o,,.

w
(1M

~"·- ~ - •
¼',;.;

:

:;

I

r

1

✓,- J~ --------- /!... ,. -~~ l'L
✓~

h'

._.

- ~~

• ! • ....,• •• t,O,,,OJl ◄ o0,6

&lt;:-1 ..... .,, ....... t, """"" ... 1,11

U"' • • •""-- • l~·:· ~""-1

~t; i;~w~t1~•.,.

•LOC,l,., ..

..._1..o,._.

o, hol ~ " ,-:,

o

MA l lA•D IAn HOlOW[W AHO ,+,.S}OC IAlU

--.-

%

I°"
0'
, .,_"-'"C,.U I
#fOIZ f..-0.,C.- • 1ua, .. . c,., ... , IC:,., Joe
Ul,. l•• tito1 •••

""

½::

-;;:;::p,:;;:;7,,._===i•,;;.:;1/h=·.;:;::.=;;;II=

&lt;.1n •u••1u. (1"1lll•U•IIU. \•UIHC..,,1,uo, nt(.U
5'•• • T 101/IJ

IIIIU

l flM,

tHU0"'"'

~~~~o:tNNtNG ,o,.~i.-~!~~=

LAND USE - 19'=,S
fill
•
D
~

RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
PUBLIC AND SEMI - PUBLIC
INDUSTRIAL AND RAILROADS
PLATE

1

�-

•

•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

13 -

Industrial land uses form a definite pattern in Gaylord,
being concentrated along the railroad tracks. A number of
industrial uses have located in and around the central business district and are scattered to the southwest side of the
city. Public and semi-public uses occupy a considerable
amount of the area within and around the City of Gaylord. The
Hidden Valley Ski Club forms a large mass on the east side of
the city; the community school, the golf course, and city
property form a large mass to the south; the sanitarium and
hospital occupy larg-e---tracts to tlie north.
West of the Interstate Highway, the County Airport occupies a large tract which
further impedes future development in that direction •
The present population of Gaylord has developed a total
of 510 acres for urban purposes within the total corporate area
of 1,022 acres.
The area occupied by existing land uses in
Gaylord is reported in Table 3, along with comparative percentages of total corporate and developed area.
These percentages are compared with the average of 28 other central
cities having a population of less than 50,000.
A total of 511 acres of Gaylord's total corporate area
is presently vacant; thus, the city is very similar to the 28
compared cities. Gaylord's present population is using approximately 150 acres for residential purposes, 30 acres for
commercial activities, nearly 50 acres for industry and railroads, 125 acres for public and semi-public and parks, and 160
acres for streets.
Residential land uses occupy nearly 30 percent of Gaylord's
developed area which is somewhat lower than the 34 percent average for the compared cities.
Commercial uses occupy over six
percent of the developed area in Gaylord, which is nearly double
the percent of area devoted to this type of land use in the compared cities.
Industrial and railroad uses are somewhat lower
than the compared cities with eight percent of the developed
area of Gaylord devoted to this purpose compared to over 10 percent of the other cities. The lack of park space in Gaylord is
clearly pointed out in the comparisons made in Table 3. The
city has less than one percent of its developed a_r ea devoted to
parks, whereas in the compared cities over five percent of the
developed area is dedicated for park purposes. Public and semipublic uses in Gaylord occupy a considerably larger share of
the developed area.
Streets and alleys occupy a slightly higher
percentage of the developed area than is true of the compared
cities.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 14 Table 4
LAND USE AND POPULATION RATIOS
Gaylord, Michigan

Vandalia, - Jackson,
Illinois
Missouri

Gaylord,
Michigan

Oconto,
Wisconsin

LeMars,
Iowa

Single-Family
Residential

5.68

6.85

5.09

6.03

8.48

Two and Multiple
Family Residential

0.23

0.49

0.28

0.11

0.23

Commercial

1.12

0.60

0.51

0.74

0.57

Industrial

0.90

1.90

0.71

1.36

0.89

Railroads

0.72

1.31

0.73

0.53

0.41

Parks

0.08

2.29

1.96

0.61

1.16

Public and
Semi-Public

4.71

2.19

3.36

0.80

0.87

Streets

6.12

7.18

5.53

6.76

4.08

19.56

22.83

18.17

16.94

16.69

Land Use
Classification

Total
Developed Area

�I

l

"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

,r--------------·-...::c::

1-

r---

•

' " ' "1.0, .... (ll,.

1-UU 10.,,11

11,.. , .. llu, l~ • Olc ... , Al0,11ac:u
foU ,T
11144
• 1uo.,,.

(IW'SI,

C 'T Y ,uN~•hC. C01-.!M 155ION
GAYlOI.O
MICHIGAN

DISTRIBUTION OF
DWELLING
UNITS - f 9 (, 5 &amp; 1985
• ONE DOT REPRESENTS FOUR DWELLING
UNITS OR FOURTEEN PERSONS, 19f&gt;S
• ONE DOT REPRESEN TS FOUR DWELLING
UNITS OR FOURTEEN PERSONS. 1985

PLATE

2

�•
•
•I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

~ - J,.5 -

Dwelling Unit Distribution
The present distribution of dwelling units within Gaylord
is shown on Plate 2, with one dot equalling four dwelling
units.
This distribution of dwelling units was determined
from the land use survey which counted a total of 744 dwelling
units within the city.
The present distribution of dwelling
units is a reflection of the existing land patterns within t he
community.
With the exception of the central area and a few
large public open spaces, the population is fairly uniformly
distributed. This population is concentrated in and around
the central part of the total corporate area and, to some extent, is scattered along the major highways leading from the
city.
Future Land Use Needs
Estimates of future land use needs for the community can
be developed from past trends in the relationship between land
use and population.
Acres of land used per 100 persons in
Gaylord is compared with four other cities of similar size located in the states of Wisconsin, Iowa, Illinois and Missouri.
Table 4 shows the definite similarity between Gaylord and the
compared cities in land use and population. These communities
are using approximately five to eight acres per 100 persons
for single-family residential purposes and a very minor amount
of land for two-family and multiple-family residential purposes.
There is a definite similarity in the amount of land per 100
persons used for commercial purposes in the other cities; however, Gaylord is using over one acre per 100 persons, which is
considerably more than the compared communities. A variation
is found in the amount of land used for industrial and railroad purposes, and Gaylord is using less area for these purposes than all of the other communities except one.
It is significant to note that Gaylord is using nearly five acres per
100 persons for public and semi-public uses compared to the
next highest of 3.3 acres per 100 persons.
This ratio will
undoubtedly increase in the future. Gaylord is using an average amount of land per 100 persons for streets and alleys.
The probable future land use needs of Gaylord are based
upon the 1985 estimated population of 4,700 persons. The
present population is using 19.56 acres of land per 100 persons for all types of land uses. The amount of land needed
for every 100 persons is expected to decrease slightly; however, the land required for various types of uses is expected
to alter significantly.
Future land use requirements for
Gaylord are shown in Table 4.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

-

16 -

The acres used per 100 persons for single-family residential purposes will increase slightly to six acres per 100
•
persons, recognizing
the recent trends toward larger lot
sizes.
With the development of highway commercial activities
in the Gaylord area, it is expected that the amount of land
used per 100 persons for commercial activities will increase
to approximately 1.50 acres per 100 persons.
Similarly, industrial needs are expected to increase to approximately two
acres per 100 persons.
As previously noted, the amount of
land in Gaylord devoted to park purposes is unusually low.
Based upon national standards, the future needs are estimated
at one acre per 100 persons of population.
As previously
noted, the amount of land in Gaylord devoted to streets and
public rights-of-way is extremely high. This ratio should
decline in the future as new areas are planned and more spacious street developments and larger block sizes are developed.
Commercial and industrial land uses are expected to increase
significantly during the next several decades.
The increases
shown in the table reflect a trend toward larger floor areas
in stores and industrial plants, greater parking requirements,
and increased needs for open storage and expansion.
Based upon these ratios of land use and population, the
future population of 4,700 persons would require a total of
890 acres of land for urban purposes. This would require
nearly 380 acres of vacant land to be absorbed for urban land
uses.
An additional 140 acres would be required for residential purposes, 40 acres for commercial, 75 acres for industrial, nearly 50 acres for park, and only an additional 40
acres for public and semi-public purposes.
It is expected
that the total amount of land needed for streets will only increase from 160 to 190 acres.
The present use of 511 acres
would increase to 890 acres occupying nearly all of the present corporate area of the community.
The foregoing analysis
indicates the amount of land that should be provided in the
future land use plan and indicates the amounts of commercial
and industrial areas that should be provided for in zoning
areas within the present corporate limits and within the
areas immediately around the corporate limits.
Land Use Plan
The proposed land use arrangement for a future community
of 4,700 is shown in the Land Use Plan (See Plate 3), which
generally indicates the areas proposed for residential, commercial, industrial, and open space uses.
The Land Use Plan
is a synthesis of the economic population and land use studies.
Concurrent consideration was given to circulation and street
planning, community facilities, open spaces, and the total potential of the site.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

~

'\

,,.........

\

\

\

- + - - - - = =-------- -------

~\

": .~.: ( T

"
".

\
'(.l .,.,_r t .. •

)(

,,
I

'::

\

:.·/'
\1

\,.._ ,
__

(

--- I -

--- - □, i ,,
' -

j.!:7;,

]

l

I

.
I
I

--;

I

1

; "i-

,

I

- ,.. .

I

l

,·:-.$

I

_ _ _jI

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

•t&gt;0 ,1'1' ot,,t 'TO
c;o-..F

USE

LAND
D
~

D
•
E23
-

C.OU'l..'5.'-

I

PLAN - 1985

RESIDENTIAL
COMMERCIAL
PUBLIC AND SEMI - PUBLIC.
PARKS, SCHOOLS AND HOSPITALS
INDUSTRIAL AND RAILROADS
MAJOR STREETS
PLATE 3

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

17 -

This plan contemplates the rehabilitation and rebuilding of the central business district as the continued focal
point of commercial activity within the community and within
the trade area. Residential development has been confined
fairly well to create proper population densities. Industrial development has been held to the existing industrial
areas along the railroad tracks and in a new area located
along the west side of the Interstate Highway. Recreational
activities and open spaces have been created to serve the
various residential areas.
Residential Areas
The development of three major residential areas, with
park areas to serve as focal points for each residential area,
are contemplated. The existing elementary school located on
the south side of the city would serve the present residential
area south of Main Street and some proposed residential developments also south of Main and to the east of the existing
school site. A second residential area would be located north
of Main and east of the railroad tracks.
This residential
area would primarily be served by a proposed elementary school,
athletic field, and park area on Hayes Road. A third and
smaller residential area would include those areas west of
the railroad tracks, served by one 10-acre park area.
A desirable future distribution of dwelling units within
Gaylord was developed concurrently with the land use studies.
One dot on Plate 2 equals four dwelling units of the 1985 population of 4,700. A greater part of the new dwelling units
are expected to locate to the southeast, northeast, and north,
with lesser increases along the west city limits. The future
distribution also contemplates a limited amount of filling in
of certain of the vacant areas in the north section of the
city. This proposed distribution of dwelling units suggests
a generally balanced pattern and does not contemplate extensive dwelling unit development beyond the planned residential
areas of the community~ The planned future distribution of
dwelling units should result in an adequate density of dwelling units so as to provide a sound urban pattern. Generally
speaking, the density of the new and growing areas is slightly
less than the density of the present developed residential
areas of the city.
In the usual residential neighborhood, approximately one-half of the land is used for residential purposes with the remaining one-half used for streets, schools,
parks, churches, and parcels of vacant land. A residential
development with lots averaging 7,500 feet in area produces a
density for approximately three dwelling units per acre, in
contrast to large lots (20,000 square feet) where the average

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

18 denstty would be one dwelling unit per acre. - The Land Use
Plan and the dist r ibution of dwelling units shown on Plate 2
provide _a density of approximately two to three dwelling uni ts
per acre. This density is adequate to provide normal urban
services at reasonable costs.
Commercial Development
Under the proposed plan, the central business district
would remain the dominant commercial center of the city. Recognizing the need for highway commercial developments, the
plan proposes the commercial development at Main Street and
the Interstate Highway on the west side of the city. This is
in line with the economic requirements for greater recreational-tourist commercial activity, with planned touristoriented facilities at the various interchanges along the
Interstate Highway. This commercial center would be used
primarily for motels, restaurants, and various entertainment
and recreational activities. It is expected that the commercial uses south ·of the city would also be highway and touristoriented. Continued u~e of this area has been provided in
the plan as well as a new smaller commercial center to the
north on Old Highway 27 at the north city limits. This commercial area would _be primarily for service of residential
uses.
Parks and Open Spaces
- Although Gaylord has a large amount of land dedicated
to various open spaces, only a limited amount of land has
been provided for actual park use. The comprehensive plan
proposed the development of three major recreational park
areas within the corporate limits. The present city park
and community school on the south side of the city would be
enlarged by approximately 30 acres over to a proposed extension of Grandview Boulevard. A completely new and enlarged
park, recreation and educational complex is proposed in
the 40-acre tract on Hayes Road. This proposed park area
would serve the residential area north of Main Street and
would also provide_ athletic field facilities for the entire
county. The third and smaller open space has been proposed
in the west side of the city to serve the immediate residential area.
Industrial Areas
Industrial development is proposed to be continued along
the railroad tracks along the southeast side of Gaylord. However, future industrial growth is primarily expected to take

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I
I

-

19 -

Table 5

•
FUTURE LAND USE REQUIREMENTS
Gaylord, Michigan
Acres of Land Per 100 Persons
Land Use
Classification

Needed by 1985

Acres of Land
Used in 1961

5.68

6.00

147.6

0.23
1.12
0.90
0.72
0.08

0.20
1.50
2.00
o. 70
1.00

6.1
31.2
23.5
18.8
2.1

4. 71
6.12

3.50
4.00

122.5
159.1

19.56

18.40

510.9

Used in 1965

Single-Family
Residential
Two and Multiple
Family Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Railroads
Parks
Public and
Semi-Public
Streets and Alleys
Total

Acres of Land
Needed in 1985 (1)
Single-Family
Residential
Two and Multiple
Family Residential
Commercial
Industrial
Railroads
Parks
Public and
Semi-Public
Streets and Alleys
Total

(1)

280
10
70
100
30
50
160
190
890

Based on a population of 4,700.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

- 20 -

place in the large industrial area along the west side of
Interstate 75. Tllis area would be served by the interchange
on the Interstate Highway in Gaylord at M-32 and by an interchange to the south with Old 27. The area is also close to
the existing Otsego County Airport. Thus, the proposed future
industrial area would be provided with highway access from the
Interstate Highway, with a major east-west highway and with
ready access to airport facilities.
The Land Use Plan provides for a total urban area of
1,500 acres. Of this, approximately 680 acres has been set
aside for residential development. The plans provide for 200
acres of commercial development which is ample to meet the
estimated 70 acres shown in Table 5. The industrial areas
shown in the plan are far in excess of those needed for the
City · of Gaylord; however, this industrial area is designed
to serve the long-range needs of the entire county and is coordinated with the Land Use Plan for Otsego County. A total
70 acres of park space is provided in the Land Use Plan which
is in excess of the required 50 acres shown in Table 5.

�I
I

I
I
I

I·

I

I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I

I
I

-

21 -

THOROUGHFARE PLAN
The movement of traffic throughout a community can best
be accomplished by designating and improving to desirable
standards relatively few strategically-placed, direct and
continuous routes.
Control is facilitated and movement becomes more continuous, even when the traffic is concentrated
on a few thoroughfares, than when it is dispersed on most of
the streets within the community.
The major streets can be
improved with w~der and heavier pavements to accommodate
ordinary traffic:. as well as the movement of trucks and heavy
vehicles.
The remaining minor streets, which would constitute three-fourths of the total street system, can then be
relatively narrow and lightly paved. Thus, the cost of the
original construction of the street system as a whole can be
substantially reduced and the expense of street maintenance
can be held to a minimum. Further, as the preponderance of
traffic can be diverted from residential neighborhoods -to
the streets in such areas, such streets will be safer to use
and will be less noisy.
Present Street System
Gaylord's street system has developed gradually since
the 1870's. During a century of evolution, the street system
has grown through the dedication of many individual rightsof-way and subdivisions. These have been generally small and,
for the most part, uncoordinated. The present system forms a
gridiron pattern generally oriented due north, south and eastwest.
Development of a gridiron system in Gaylord has created
problems found in most communities; that is, there is little
differentiation between major and minor streets, resulting in
the division of traffic on many of the residential streets.
Because of the original platting and fairly small blocks, there
is an obvious excess of streets; in some instances there are
streets every 300 feet in some of the originally platted sections near the center of the city.
Gaylord is served by Old U. s. Highway 27 which enters
the city from the north on Center Street, travels through the
central business area on Main Street, and extends to the south
out of the city on Otsego Avenue.
Michigan Highway 32 is an
important east-west route in northern Michigan and runs from
Charlevoix to Alpena. This route follows Main Street through
the entire length of the City of Gaylord.
Interstate 75, a
federal highway, is not a part of the Gaylord street system in
the strict sense, but does provide access to the city from
other parts of the county, the state, and the nation.
Interstate 75 passes along the west side of the city with a traffic

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

22 -

Table 6

•

EXISTING MAJOR STREET DATA
Gaylord, Michigan

Section

Name of Street
Main Street
Center Avenue
Otsego Avenue
Ohio Avenue
Fourth Street
Mitchell Street
Congdon Road
Hayes Roaq.
Five Lake Road
McCoy Road
Dickerson Road
Murner Road

Right-ofWay Width

Pavement
Width

80'
66'
66'

20'
20'
20'

66'
66'
66'
66'
66'
66'
66'
66'
66'

20'
20'
20'

Limits to Limits
Limits to Main
Main to Limits
Morgan Road
Main to Limits
Illinois to Oak
Ohio to Center
Morgan to Hayes
Main to Congdon
Morgan to Hayes
U.S. 27 to East
M-32 to South
M-32 to North
Type of Paving (1)

Name of Street
Main Street
Center Avenue
Otsego Avenue
Ohio Avenue
Fourth Street
Mitchell Street

Concrete with Bit. Con. Surface
Concrete with Bit. Con. Surface
Concrete with Bit. Con. Surface
Oil Seal and 1,320' Gravel
Oak to Elm Bit. Agg. Bal. Oil Seal
Bit. Agg. Center to Otsego 39' Wide

Congdon Road
Hayes Road

Unimproved Earth
3,328' Oil Seal Bal. Unimproved
Earth
Morgan to Old 27 Bit. Agg. Bal. Oil
Seal
Bituminous Aggregate
Bituminous Aggregate
Bituminous Aggregate

Five Lake Road
McCoy Road
Dickerson Road
Murner Road

;

(1) Conc rete, bituminous,-•oiled, gravel
(2) Good, fair, poor

**

20'
20'
20'
20'
20'
Condition(2)
Good
Good
Good
Fair
Fair
Fair to
Good
Poor
Fair to
Poor
Good
Good
Good
Good

�I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 23 interchange at the south end of the urban area where it
crosses Old U. s. 27 and on the west side of the city where
it crosses Michigan Highway 32.
Gaylord presently bas a fairly adequate street system,
consisting of Main Street which bisects the city in an eastwest direction, Murner Road, Center Avenue, Ohio Avenue, and
Hayes Road which run north from Main Street, Sand Road,
Otsego Avenue south of Main Street, and a fairly continuous
number of east-west routes consisting of Congdon Road, Five
Lake Road, Mitchell Street, Fourth Street and McCoy Road.
Data on the existing major streets within the Gaylord area is
shown in Table 6. By-and-large, most of the right-of-ways
are 60 foot with the exception of Main Street which has an
SO-foot right of way. The Interstate Highway, not actually
a part of the internal street system, has a right-of-way width
of 400 to 500 feet.
All of the existing major streets in
Gaylord have two moving lanes with various widths for parking
lanes. Most of the paving is bituminous and is generally in
fair condition~
Lack of continuity found in some of the major thoroughfares in the southern part of the city is one of the major
problems of the present street system. For example, Fourth
Street does not run continuously east-west; there is no connection between Grandview Boulevard and Center Avenue, Maple
Avenue, or Hayes Road.
There is also a lack of any adequate
connection between several of the north-south routes such as
Wisconsin Avenue with Ohio Avenue. Another problem is the
absence of cross-town routes in the northern part of the city.
North Street, for example, does not run continuously between
Ohio Avenue and Hayes Avenue. There are five railroad crossings of existing streets with the New York Central Railroad
tracks within Gaylord.
A number of these crossings do not
have proper protection.
Traffic Patterns
The average daily traffic flow in Gaylord for the major
streets within the city and on important county roads is shown
on Plate 4. These traffic volumes were obtained from counts
made by the State Highway Department in 1962 and from traffic
counts made by the Automobile Club of Michigan within Gaylord
in 1963. Some of the counts were obtained from the County
Road Commission's survey made in 1959.
As is apparent, the most important corridor of traffic
through the city is Main Street, which bad a peak 24-hour
traffic volume in excess of 15,000 vehicles within the central
business district.
As would be expected, the next highest
volumes are found on Old u. s. 27 with some 4,400 cars on

�I
I
I
I

I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

- 24 Center Avenue north of Main Street and some 7,700 cars on
Otsego Avenue sout'h of Main Street. · The traffic volumes on
Main Street reduce very rapidly at the edges of the urban
area with some 3,700 vehicles on Main Street or U. S. 32 just
east of the city limits • . Twenty-four hour traffic volumes on
the Interstate Highway are approximately 3,000 to 3,500 vehicles per day, however, much higher volumes exist during the
summer months. Most of the traffic on the Interstate is
through traffic; it does ,not originate or have its destination
within the City of Gaylord. Traffic flow on most of the other
streets within the city is less than 1,000 cars. Mitchell
Street does have some 1,600 cars in a 24-hour period just east
of Court Avenue. The traffic counts indicate that there is a
fairly wide dispersal of cars traveling over the other streets both major and minor - within· the community. For example, approximately five of the streets south of Main Street have
traffic flows between .700 and 1,000 vehicles. This indicates
that none of these streets is functioning as a major street;
that all of the traffic is dispersed widely over all of the
residential streets within the area, much to the disadvantage
of the residential amenities of these areas.
Traffic in urban areas is expected to increase from four
to five percent per year; thus, by the year 1985 traffic is
expected to increase approximately 100 to 125 percent. For
the purposes of estimating future traffic volumes in Gaylord,
the existing traffic flows can be increased by 100 percent
for the 20-year period. Application of this increase to certain existing volumes · reveals some significant increases; for
instance, traffic flow on Main Street by 1985 would be in excess of 30,000 vehicles in a 24-hour period compared to the
present range of 15,000 cars in 24 hours.
Proposed Thoroughfare Plan
The proposed thoroughfare plan bas incorporated as many
of the existing streets within the community as possible,
with the number and length of proposed thoroughfares held to
a minimum consistent with sound planning principles. The
street plan was developed in conjunction with the highway
plan for the county and with the land use plan to insure
proper development and access to all future land use development within the city.
(See Plate 5.)
The proposed major street system in Gaylord would consist of three major north-south routes - Wisconsin-ObioMorgan, Otsego-Center and Hayes Road. The east-west routes
would consist of Congdon Road, Five Lake Road, North Avenue,
Main Street, Fourth Avenue, and Grandview Boulevard.
In
order to complete this system of major thoroughfares, several extensions and improvement of existing major thoroughfares would be necessary.

�•I
I
1·

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

~

7

t.

t-

\•

!'I

\

11

)

H I DDEN
V~Ll[Y

J

"':j
_,

5KI

-

[tj.

.

-- lI

-

\I

t -

[J

~

-

...

I

)

0

0

-/'

'I

,.

Cl"'t"i a.•

I

- ~' ~ ~ = - ·

r1rm=-~

11~1

...

\

'

I

- ·

,\

::·
-~:_...;-t=
·
::!
-r-

-

-

.-~~
I

.

.
1··":.~-----=-·=::::.::::.:.::.·( -~'

'

\':[

- - ---

,,
:)

,:•

-

__

ii
;:::

M-3'2. ~ - , 1

§i~

~

I

g,c::l

" ? ..,,,..

~-

!

-

I

•

I

.

:::·:::: -:::
·- OTSE.GO

1
I
..J.

COUNTY

Al RPOR.r

TRAFFIC
PER

VEHICLES

F LOW ~'/! ENTY - FOUR

1965

HOUR PERIOD

0

GRAPH IC. SC.ALE

PLATE

4

�I

I

HIDDEN
V~LLEY

L - -

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

CLUB

'-------~II

.

I

LJ

----------

~E
~E
~II
E
~

.,

-

ffl

MAJOR
--:

STREET PLAN

=

EXISTING MAJOR STREETS
PROPOSED MAJOR STREETS
MINOR STREETS
PROPOSED
STREET VACATIONS

•

RAILROAD

c::Jc::J

-

I

I
.

CROSSING

ELIMINATIONS

L-J

�I
I
I
I
I

ST~E.ET

~·
E

Pldl.KINy

LANE

LANE®

LEFT

STAN Dl\"-D

AIMT

su.. 1,e
Z-u.,..Ufll

ACCEPT

0

Al'&gt;LE

,h

Ja

&amp;MJ,Hl.

Ja

rizD
. ,.

,

-

S10fWA\.IC...~
J....OW LINt

~~
ni-

~

:i:

I

10 11

I

! 0·10-,·, ro~· ,J

I I !I
d
1

Sll..lPl

d]

f--.. E. QUI
80' il-.OW

I

,-P AI NT

/

I

~

,

_ _o_·

I

I

n

I ,;;:O'-~H I

I1. ~ H
11

.

G.O' 11...0W

;B"

1Z' f-

l ' C.

~- -·

10 · TO I~'

YOUHl,-.Mt

~

I

I

t&lt;.' TO 19"

I

LtJ,.A.fJIC lAlll fDOf

UNf tt&gt;Cil

f--..lGHT-OF-WAY

~

vu.. 1,..&amp;Lt
~

'

Ji

I

(Ci"-ASS STll..lP
AND SIDEWALK)

U .. AfflC
LAN£ f D ( j l '

.

n

MINIMUM

-··1

''

l'&gt;O"-DEft...~

LANES ONLY)
10'

--

MWIANQ)

(TO T"-AFFIC

- ~

I

E.LE.MENT5

l'&gt;Al-..1(..IE"-. CU"-.1'&gt;
CLEA"-ANCE

TUlN CI))

ll'

"E M E. N T S
100' 11...0W.

IZO'kO. W

N

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

C ~OS S - S E.C TION

(1H"-.U O"-.

y

~

f0 ~
TH o~o u G H FA ~E s

Tft...AFFIC

T

I
I
I

I
I

s TA N DA~D s

G [_ N t ~AL
MAJ 0 ~

le

2 TkMFIC L,l.NE s ®
0 PAkK..IN6 LANES

STANDH... D

2 H.AfflC L,l.NES®
1 P,l.JP...KIN6 LANE

AC.Cf PTAME
500-(750) 0

STANO,l.J..0

2 TkAFFIC L,l.NES ®

ACCEPTAIHE
SS0 ·(850)+

SlANDA/1...D

2 PM... K..IN6 LANES
3 H.MFIC LANES@
0 PAkKINO L,l.NtS

~CCEPTA&amp;LE
(11SO)•

STANDAJP...D

SS0-(800)•

&lt;.OO·C8SO)•

(.50-(1100)+

-

(1300) 0

3 H... AFFIC LANES @
I PAJ..KINCi LANE

MINIMUM
(950)·

ACCEPT ASLE
(1150) 0

SlANDAkD

;) H..MFIC LANES @
2 PAkKINCi LANES

MINIMUM
(1350)•

,l.CCE PTA!&gt;LE
(1500)•

STANO.-.,._D
(1(.00)•

4 TkAfflC LANl5 (i)
0 PAkKIN&lt;i LANES

MINIMUM
000

ACCEPTA!&gt;Lt
850

STANDA'--D
1100

4 TkAFFIC L,l.NES
I LEFT 1Ul'...N LANE
0 PAI..KIN(i L,l.NfS

CD

(1300) •

MINIMUM
10,0

AC.C.f PTA!&gt;LE
IZSO

STAHDAJP....D
1~00

4 TkAFFIC LANlS CD
2 PAl'...KIN(i LANES

MINIMUM
900

ACCEPTAIILE
1200

STANDAJP....O
1400

4 T/1...AFFIC L,l.NES CD
1 LEFT TU'-N L,l.Nf
Z PAJ...KIN(i LANtS

M I NIMUM
11,0

ACClPTAe.LE
1300

SUNDAJP....O
IC.00
II

CI)

THE LEFT TUl'...N LANES MAY I;[ 10' WIDE

WITHOUT

SO-.IOUSLY

IMPAk l NCi

OPE!l-.ATION

(V WHfk[ PAJ..KINCi LAN[S Akf TO !&gt;E USED ,l.S PlAK-HOUk TJ..AFFIC LANES, TH[Y SHOULD !&gt;E DESIGNtD 10 H.AfflC LAN[

@

STANOA'-DS WITH J...EuAkO TO CUk~ CUA'--,l.NCt LAN[ WIDTH, ,l.NO P,l.lNT STJ..IPE LOCATION.
IF THE M[DIAN CONTAINS ,l. L[fT TU'-N LAN[, THE LEFT Tu,:..N L,l.Nl WIDTH
(10·-12·) MUST H
MlDl,l.N WIDTH.
THE LA'--Cilk bOkDt/1... WIDTHS SHOULD H USED ON THt WIDl/1... C'--OSS-S[CTIONS

ADDED

TO

THE

@
G) NO MEDIAN 15 CONSIDE'-.EO ON TH[S[ CkOSS-SECTIONS

©
(?)

THES[ CJP...055-SECTIONS AkE fOJ... ONE-WAY TI..AfflC ONLY.
THES[ o . . oss-SECTIONS Al-.[ fO'-. TWO -W AY T'-AfllC ONLY
PAlt..KIN(i Pt'-.MITHO ONLY WHO...f P,l.lt..KIN(i LANES PkOVIDtD.
NUMbl'-.S UN0[/1... O ..OSS-StCTION CLASSIFICATIONS D[SIGNATt DESIGN CAP,'\CITY IN VEHICl[S P[/1... HOU'-. bY c,:..oss-StCTION
PLAIN NUMM'-S All..t FOk TWO-WAY TkAfflC-PA/1...!NTHESIS NUMM"'-S A'-E FO'-- CNf·W,'\Y 11-AfflC.
DATA TAIC.fN Fl'...OM OfSICiN CAPACITY CHA'--TS FO'-. SICiNMIZtD SlkElT ,'\NO HIGHWAY INTfkStCllONS, bUlt..lW Of PUHIC
'-OADS, kEVISfD I9S9, WllH THE fOLLOWIN(i ASSUMPTIONS : 10¼ Tl'...UCK.S - 20% ll.I6H1 TUl'...N - 10Y. LEFT TU'-N - NO !&gt;US
STOPS· 61'...EtN/CYClt 4SYo· NO SEPA'-,l.ll LlfT TUl'...N SICiNAL-P,\'-K.INCi Pl'...OHlblTtD 100 flll fl'...OM I Nlll'...Sl(T IO N
•DOWNTOWN Al'...lA (fOI.... ONE-WAY STl'...llTS ONLY)
+f'-lNCit "'-f,l. (fO k ONf-WAY SlkflTS ONlY)
INltl'...MlOl,l.H Alt..E,l. FO,:.. TWO-WAY H.ArFIC VOLUMES

•4) ,...,.,,:,.,11
'"'°"""' • ho).._.,(,l••
~-_. . . . •.:;::4.!~:C~!!t~~.,:.,"'t.~
• -1

u,,.1.-100,

•'tlO

,.., • ••-&lt;-

0f
llDI"' •

•ur11 MO( t

~u '; ,w:.!. ..rov

0,

'"°"'-'" , .,,_

'"'

MAllAfilO tAlltiOI011tfW Af&lt;O AUOCIAll)

1 1l()w I...

..o.n..c. ""'

Of

~

!:'~

1• ~~:",~ll,

t,o,~t•":

" ll • ~ ..~,.-01.(A#I

'•°''"" "IG
GAnOt0
C 1'1'

•:~,•:!(ul~

I
.
i

C~•v. !r.~ ION
M ICHIG~N

PLATE 6
.', j

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 25 -

One of the mpst important proposals of the thoroughfare
plan is the re-routing of traffic from Main Street within the
central business district.
It is therefore recommended that
through traffic using Old U. S. Highway 27 continue south on
Center Avenue from Main Street to Second Street, travel two
blocks westward to Otsego Avenue, and then resume south along
the present route.
One of the most serious points of congestion in the city is the two-block section on Main Street between Center Avenue and the railroad tracks.
This would relieve this congested area of through north-south traffic. Main
Street would, of course, continue to handle through east-west
traffic.
This by-pass route would not require any new rightsof-way with the exception of rounding the northwest corner of
Second Street and Center Avenue.
There is a definite lack of through streets in Gaylord
south of Main Street. The thoroughfare plan would provide for
a new north-south route which would primarily consist of an
extension of Grandview Boulevard northeasterly into Hayes Road
at Main Street. This route would enable all traffic entering
the city from the east which is destined for the southern
parts of the city to by-pass the central business district.
It would also provide a boundary for the proposed expansion
of the school and park site. Much of the right-of-way for
this route could be acquired as properties are subdivided,
and the land is dedicated for future development. The land
use plan indicates a need for some improved east-west routing
in the northerly part of the city.
It is, therefore, recommended that North Street be developed as a continuous route
from Ohio Avenue over to Hayes Road. This would require several new sections of rights-of-way as shown on Plate 5, which
also could be acquired as these areas are subdivided in the
future.
Several other adjustments to the major street system are
recommended in the thoroughfare plan.
It is proposed that
Wisconsin Avenue be re-routed into Ohio Avenue, as shown in
the plan, to an area that is presently under consideration as
a shopping center.
A second improvement would be the extension
of Fourth Street from Maple Avenue easterly to the Grapdview
Boulevard extension, providing continuous east-west traffic
from Hayes to Wisconsin.
Five Lake Road and Congdon Road
would continue to provide important east-west major routes in
the northern part of the city.
The recommended cross-sections
for the proposed streets are shown on Plate 6.

�I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I

I

I

I
I
I
I
I
I

- 27 THE CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT
Gaylord's business district serves as a focal point
for a majority of the community's varied economic and social
activities and as a trade and tourist center for the surrounding territory.
The present business area is comparable with that of
other communities of similar size. Most of the buildings were
erected many years ago, and today are approaching obsolescence.
The area grew without any real direction, being developed by
many separate individuals without consideration for the entire
area. The present street system is fairly adequate; however,
in previous years a great volume of through traffic was forced
into this central area.
Although there is a sizeable amount
of on-street parking, very little off-street parking has been
developed.
Little, if any, attention has been given to pedestrian access other than provision of standard sidewalks.
Land Use Pattern
The preponderance of commercial development is found
along the frontages of Main Street from the railroad tracks
to Center Avenue, a three block distance. This area contains
the primary retail and walk-in commercial facilities.
Commercial uses are also found along Main Street from the railroad
tracks west to the Interstate 75, but they are more in the
nature of automotive-oriented commercial facilities such as
restaurants, filling stations, and entertainment facilities.
Commercial uses are also found along some of the streets
crossing Main Street, although to a lesser degree. The
greatest secondary concentration is along Otsego Avenue primarily south, and to some extent north, of Main Street. Commercial uses have scattered in and around Hurst and Second
Street south of Main Street. These commercial uses in Gaylord
primarily form an elongated pattern which does not provide the
most efficient and desirable type of commercial center.
Only
a limited number of industrial uses have intermixed with the
commercial uses within the commercial area.
A railroad track
crossing Main Street has provided a barrier for commercial
uses to the west.
Gaylord's business district is not totally prepossessing
in its appearance.
Although there have been a number of buildings remodeled in recent years, a number of which are along the
Tyrolean architectural line, many remaining buildings are old
and obsolete.
In addition to the obsolete buildings, the
presence of numerous signs and overhead telephone and utility

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I

I
I

wires and poles ·add to the cluttered appearance of the area.
Any re-planning of Gaylord's business district should give
serious consideration to the aesthetic improvement of the
total area and all of the buildings within the area.
These conditions are not peculiar to Gaylord. Practically every city has recognized the poor appearance of its
central area and is attempting to accent attractiveness in
order to successfully compete with newly developing centers.
Street Pattern
The streets of Gaylord's business district are laid • out
in a system running north-south and east-west. Through traffic is concentrated ·on Main Street and there are no parallel
streets that are used to by-pass traffic around the area.
Early problems of the business district were created because
both U. s. 27 and Michigan 32 passed directly through the
area on Main Street. The completion of Interstate Highway
75 removed much of the north-south traffic; however, there
continues to be a considerable amount of through traffic on
Michigan 32. Through traffic does not add to the activity
of the area and represents a detriment to the area's future
function.
The right-of-way width of all streets within the
central area is 66 feet with the exception of Main Street,
which has an 80-foot right-of-way.
Traffic volumes within the central area are comparatively
high for a community of Gaylord's size. Traffic volumes on
Main Street, between Center and the railroad tracks, are in
excess of 15,000 cars in a 24-hour period. A high volume is
also found on Otsego Avenue south of Main, with 7,700 cars in
24 hours.
West of the railroad tracks, the traffic volume
decreases to 9,200 cars in a 24-hour period. North of Main
Street on Old Highway 27, the volume is more than 5,000 vehicles. Minor traffic flows are found on Mitchell Street, First
Street and Second Street - all less than 1,000 vehicles in 24
hours.
Peak hour traffic volumes generally represent ten percent
of the total 24-hour traffic flow. The highest peak hour
volume within Gaylord's business area would be on Main Street
at Court Avenue, with a peak flow of approximately 1,500 vehicles.
The capacity of this street, assuming 500 cars per lane,
would indicate that traffic flow on Main Street is reaching a
critical point, especially during the peak-hour periods and
during the summer months. The peak flow, however, on the remainder of the streets within the area, does not appear to be
critical. There is no need for any major pavement widening.

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

I
I

- 29 Parking Facilities
Existing parking facilities in the business district consist primarily of curb spaces with only a small amount of offstreet parking.
The following review of the use of parking
facilities indicates that while there are a number of curb
spaces, there is a definite need to provide additional offstreet parking facilities.
The types of existing parking facilities are summarized
in the following:
Type of
Parking Facility

Number of Spaces

Street Parking
2-Hour Meters
2-Hour Meters - Summer
12-Minute Meters
12-Minute Meters - Summer
10-15 Minute Posted
12 10-15 Minute Posted
2-Hour Posted
No Limit
Total
Off-Street Parking
Public Lots
Private Lots
Total
Total All Parking·

110
89
2
2

15
108
54
15
380
51
289
340
720

There are a · total of 720 parking spaces within the central business district study area. Of the total, only 340 (or
47 percent) are off-street spaces, with the majority being on~treet parking spaces. Most of the on-street parking space is
·2-hour posted or 2-hour metered,
These, with the no-limit
spaces, total 304 parking spaces which can be used by persons
parking for a fairly long period of time.
Only 42 percent of
the parking spaces within the central area are designed for
tourists or for shoppers remaining parked for less than two
hours.
It is unfortunate that, of the 720 existing spaces, a
total of 289 are private parking spaces, representing 40 percent of the total parking within the study area.
The off-street parking facilities within the business district are generally inconvenient and are not easily accessible
to the commercial frontages along Main Street. A parking turnover and accumulation study was conducted within the study area

�I
I

- 30 -

I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Table 7
· PERCENTAGE OF VEHICLES PARKING BY . TIME PERIODS

Gaylord, Michigan

Time Period

½ hour
½ to 1

or less
hour
1 to l½ hours
l½ to 2 hours
2 to 2½ hours
2½ to 3 hours
3 to 3½ hours
3½ to 4 hours
4 hours or more

Time Period

½ hour
½ to 1

or less
hour
1 to l½ hours
l½ to 2 hours
2 to 2½ hours
2½ to 3 hours
3 to 3½ hours
3½ to 4 hours
4 hours or more

· source:
(1)

Two-Hour
Meters

Two-Hour
Posted (1)

80.2
13.2
3.8
2.1
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.2
100.0

68.1
15.9
5.0
3.5
2.0
2.0
2.0
0.5
1.0
100.0

Two-Hour
Posted
50.0
11.1
5.6
16. 7
5.6
5.5

o.o

0.0
5.5
100.0

10 and 15
Minute
Meters
71.5
21.4

o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o
o.o

7.1
100.0

Private
Lots

Public
Lots

Unrestricted
Spaces

11.5
13.6
6.2
5. 2 .
3.1
13.6
6.2
5.2
35.4
100.0

. 10.9··
4.3
4.4
8. 7..
6.5
, 15. 2
13. 0
.. 6.5
30.5
100.0

43.4
16.7
10.0
3.3

o.o

3.3
6.7
3.3
6.7
100.0

Survey by Harland Bartholomew and Associates,
December 29, 1964

Two-hour posted, two-hour metered in summer.

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 31 of the central business district. This study was carried out
during the peak sKi season in 1964. A sample of all types of
parking within the central area was checked every one-half
hour and license numbers were recorded as part of the turnover
survey. Results of this survey are shown in Table 7.
Concurrently, an accumulation survey was made in which every parked
vehicle within the study area was recorded every hour every
day.
The information on this survey is shown in the following:
Time Period
9:00
10:00
11:00
12:00
1:00
2:00
3:00
4:00
5:00
6:00

Vehicle
Accumulation
355
448
472
4~

435
478
445
~4
354
2W

The accumulation of vehicles recorded on December 29 and
December 30 were increased by a factor of 1.3 to produce the
foregoing estimates of vehicle accumulation during the average
summer day.
A peak accumulation occurred at 2:00 in the afternoon with a total of 478 vehicles, which represented 66.5 percent of the total 720 available spaces. The next highest peak
was found at 11:00 in the morning with 472 spaces occupied. In
view of the fact that 289 spaces (or 40 percent) are private
spaces, this indicates that all available public space was
occupied during the peak period of accumulation. These
figures are only estimates of summer accumulation and, on
many days during the summer, these figures are exceeded. The
highest recorded peak period during the actual time of the
survey was 368 vehicles at 2:00 p.m. compared to 153 vehicles
at 6:00 p.m., which is the lowest recorded parking accumulation.
The percentage of vehicles parking by time periods is
shown in Table 7 for one-half hour periods up to four hours or
more.
Similar to most communities, a greater percentage of the
parking is taking place on the metered curb spaces for one hour
or less.
As shown on Table 7, 80 percent of the parkers in the
two-hour metered spaces are remaining for one-half hour or less
and 93 percent are parking for one hour or less.
Similarly, in
the two-hour posted spaces, 68 percent are parking for one-half
hour or less and nearly 16 percent remain for one hour or less.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

- 32 On private lots, parking periods are for _longer times, with
only 25 percent remaining parked for one hour or less and
over 35 percent staying_ for four hours or more.
Parking in
the pu_b lic lots is also more on a long-term basis; only 15
percent utilized ·spaces for one hour or less and 30 percent
remained for over four hours. · This turnover survey definitely
indicates a very high demand for short-term parking as is evidenced by the use of the existing two-hour meters and two-hour
posted spaces at the curbs.
Also, there is no significant
amount of long-term public parking available within the business area.
The maximum accumulation of 478 vehicles in the central
area essentially represents the existing demand for parking
space.
This total of 478 occupied spaces must be increased
by approximately 15 percent for vacancy to allow time for entering and leaving spaces. Therefore, an additional 72 spaces
must be added to the actual demand, producing a total parking
demand of 558 sp·a ces within the study area.
The present population of 2,568 in 1960 is expected to nearly double by 1985.
The present parking demand can be expected to increase approximately two times, producing a 1985 parking demand for 1,100
spaces.
The distribution of new parking spaces, based upon the
turnover study, should be as follows; for every 100 parking
spaces, there should be 41 one-hour spaces, 11 one to two
hour spaces, 17 two to four hours spaces, and 31 spaces for
four hours or more.

1 Hour
or Less

1 to
2 Hours

2 to
4 Hours

Over
4 Hours

Total

Percent Parked

80.7

7.6

6 •.4

5.3

100.0

Average Length
of Time Parked

0.6

1.7

3.2

7.0

Space Hours Parked
Per 100 Cars Parking

48.4

12.9

20.5

37.1

118.9

Spaces Required Per
100 Cars Parking

41

11

17

31

100

Of the existing 720 total parking spaces, approximately · 52 of
every 100 spaces should be used for one hour and one to two
hour parking space, for a total of 374 spaces. At the
present time, there are only 253 spaces that are restricted

�I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

-

33 -

to two hours or less. Further, any elimination of curb park•
ing spaces along Main
Street through changes from angle parking to parallel parking and the elimination of any parking
spaces on Court Avenue, would further increase the immediate
demand.
It is therefore estimated that there should be an
additional 200 off-street parking spaces provided within the
business district within the next few years to meet current
demand. A total of 600 public parking spaces should be provided by 1985.
Development Plan for the Business District
The plan for the Gaylord business district contemplates
a gradual rebuilding and rehabilitation of the area into a
more compact shopping and big business center with improved
appearance, adequate parking, a functional street system, and
planned pedestrian circulation.
(See Plate 7.) It is a - longrange plan designed to be carried out in stages; it is one
that will take a number of years for realization. The plan
will basically require revitalization of buildings, the development of several public parking lots, and some very minor
street vacations for pedestrian malls.
Land Use Development
Fundamental to the proposed plan for the district is the
rebuilding of a large, central core area consisting of an area
generally bound by the New York Central Railroad tracks on the
west, Mitchell Street on the north, Center Avenue on the east,
and Second Street on the south.
Many of the existing buildings
within this area would be rehabilitated; others would be removed and replaced with parking facilities and commercial structures.
As the community grows and the estimated population
reaches 4,700 persons, this rebuilding and replacement will become more feasible.
The plan contemplates a concentration of
commercial development along Main Street from Center Avenue to
the New York Central Railroad tracks, with a pedestrian northsouth orientation along Court Avenue from Second Street to
Huron Street extended.
The plan includes several suggested pedestrian malls within the area as shown on Plate 7. These are only a general application of the mall concept as a part of the long-range proposal. The malls are placed along the vacation of Court Avenue.
A mall would run from Main Street north to a large series of
public off-street parking lots north of the building frontages
on Main Street. A second pedestrian mall would run south from

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

34 -

Main Street to First Street along the east edge of the proposed new city-county building. The third mall would run a
short distance south of First Street within the Court Avenue
right-of-way to a second proposed building of unique design.
The building to the north and the building to the south along
this pedestrian mall would act as focal points along this main
pedestrian access.
The third mall would provide access to a
large proposed public parking area along the south side of
First Street.
The plan envisions the gradual rebuilding of existing
buildings within the area and encourages the gradual development of buildings along the Tyrolean architectural - theme. The
same type of architectural concept should be applied to the
proposed city-county building in a subdued manner, and in a
more elaborate manner to the buildings at the north and south
axis of the proposed pedestrian malls. The existing . and proposed general locations for building groups are shown on
Plate 7.
Primarily, it is expected that commercial activity will
be centered along Main Street and to a lesser degree along _.
Otsego Avenue, the Court Avenue mall, and First Street.
If
additional commercial space is needed within the central area,
the properties along the north side of Second Street between
Court Avenue and Center Avenue conceivably could be used for
special commercial facilities.
No significant changes are proposed in the street system
for the central business area other than the vacation of Court
Avenue.
It is recommended that Main Street, First Street, and
Second Street function as important east-west circulatory
streets within the business area.
Similarly, Otsego Avenue
and Center Avenue would provide major north-south circulation.
A major change proposed for traffic within the central area
would be providing increased capacities for Main Street.
It
is recommended that Main Street be changed to four moving lanes
with two parallel parking lanes.
It would also be possible to
provide for ten-foot left turning lanes by eliminating parking
at the intersections with Center and Otsego Avenues.
Main
Street would provide four moving lanes through the entire central area from Elm Avenue to Interstate Highway 75.
To further reduce future through traffic on Main Street,
Old Highway 27 should by-pass the central core area by directing through traffic entering the business area on the north
to Center Avenue, south to Second Street and then westerly along
Second Street to Otsego Avenue.
This would require improved
paving along this four block by-pass section for two moving
lanes of traffic.

�J

I

/

.

~
~

D

D
~

EXISTING BUILDING
G~OUPS TO fZ.tMAI N
PR.OPOSED BUILDINGS

.

.

. . .. .
. . . . . ... .

.

.

.

.

.

-.~:-:-t·&gt;-~'
.I
- ··.·

.

....... . .
. .

) T.

MITCHELL

,..----- - -

.

. . . .

::&gt;

..... . .

.i:\:~·_;-_·t;_ ·c~ ·- _· . -· .·.-.-·_-: ·. :~
. . . . ·_· .· · - ~ ---- · ~L

I&lt;&lt; : ::
.

.

.

-------..,_

..

. . ' : .... ...... .- ..

~

.

. ... ...
.
.
_j

·piJicic----PAP-..¥--111·G&lt;-

lLl

._:-_· ·. -~3'~.;-: @_·. _·..· ._·. ·_..

PfZ.OPOS cD C.I TY COUNTY E&gt;UILDING
RJSI DtNTI AL Al\.tAS
OPEN SPACES

I

PI\.OPOStD PE-DfSTKIAN MALLS

U51DtNTIAL

!L

(.________
I

So AN6Lt SPACES CMN6to
o PM.ULEL SPACES

~

GITY PLAN
6J..YLOP--.D,

fr

-~~~~j ~::;=;i ~=~~~~-:;,

-----

C.OM/t\lS':&gt;ION
MIC.~16AN

·* "34 · co·ir&gt; ·.- )P-A &lt;is··.·:

l.O'.i1_·.1o·SUJE1.·.VAUH

f

·$OUrn
.. ~0\11.1
. .·4-.
..
. . . -or:
. . . M. IN
. . . . . . . . . . .. .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .

0

"'

sT.

fl~ST

..J

S

r

&lt;t"

a/.

. .

1-lU.. Lli.ND eio.. rnoLOMEW AIJD ASSOCIAHS
e, rTY PLANNf~S. llVIL tN61Hf-t"-S, WIPSCAPE ARCU/TECTS
SAINT WUIS, MIS'&gt;OUP-..l,
MA.Y
19U,

rose o. ·Ntw·

z

.. . .. .

:

ci. .l.L'r¥
. . . · S~OP~
.

·.. .1\ -E. ·_y . ·,

·-s:1-0:tN·T1
·.. .·:. ·. ·. ·.
J

./

71 \~-~____::--_

••••

l:-.,...,.-''--;:::- ----'-:i&gt;lh---dllfr.--'-t :~:l:a'"t:.....:.~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~d .~i;-__:]~,,/J~....J_/

------ - - - - - -- t - _,

--+~~--------.~~
, ,

- $ -~

f)LJSINESS

~

• ---

;

fia; -a

DI STf(I CT

. ... . .
. . : . ..

•♦

-D-f N°t"l· kl-

••••••

•

••

•

•

•

••

•

•

••

..... .

. ...... . . . .
...... . . . . . . .

Sl

11

I r

PLAN

PLATE 7

�I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

- 35 -

The development plan would provide an extensive system
of off-street parking facilities within the central area. Many
of these parking facilities can be provided in the areas that
are presently vacant; however, in order to make the parking
accessible and usable to the retail uses, it will be necessary
to gradually acquire existing commercial and residential structures.
The proposed parking areas are fairly well distributed
throughout the area so that there is an equal amount of parking throughout all parts of the area.
Proposed parking area A is located in the northwest section and would provide for a total of 76 spaces. This would
require very little demolition of existing buildings for this
public parking area. By far, the largest parking area would
consist of all the off-street spaces in public parking area B.
This area extends north from the buildings on Main Street,
from Otsego Avenue to Center Avenue, and would provide for a
total of 370 parking spaces. The service alleys north of
Main Street would be retained in the plan.
Court Avenue would
not be connected with this proposed parking facility but would
be provided with a cul-de-sac for the residential uses to the
north.
Access to this large parking area would be accomplished
with two entrances from Otsego Avenue and two entrances from
Center Avenue. Parkers would be able to circulate through the
entire area with two-way traffic on all access drives.
The
third major parking area is shown south of First Street between
Center Avenue and the vacated Court Avenue. This consists of
the existing city parking lot which would be enlarged to provide for a total of 170 parking spaces. Additional parking
facilities are shown in the plan through a combination of public or private spaces in the block bounded by Main, Center,
First, and Court Streets. Also, additional parking facilities
are recommended to the west along the New York Central Railroad
tracks south of Main Street.
There are presently 420 on-street parking spaces within
the study area; of these, 370 spaces would be retained in the
plan, as well as 300 existing off-street spaces.
The proposed
plan would provide for a total of 600 public off-street spaces,
with 170 of the private spaces retained.
There would be a
total of 770 off-street spaces in the plan. The 370 retained
curb spaces and the proposed 750 off-street spaces would provide for a total of 1,120 parking spaces.
This plan meets the
1985 estimated demand for approximately 1,100 parking spaces
within the central area.

-

~

--

---==

�I
I

-

37 -

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

I
I

Community facilities in the form of parks, schools, and
public buildings are integral parts of the physical structure
of every community. They have a very definite influence on
the community's appearance and livability, providing not only
essential open spaces but often serving as focal points for
community activities of all kinds. The availability and adequacy of various public utilities are a definite measure of
the qua~ity and the desirability of a community.
Existing Community Facilities
The existing community facilities within the City of
Gaylord have been developed over a period of many years. The
present system of parks, schools, public buildings, and underground utilities have been developed by separate groups at
varying periods of time, resulting in a relatively unrelated
system of facilities within the city.
Park and Recreational Facilities
Although there .are a number of recreational facilities
within Otsego County ·at the present time, only one park area
has been developed within the City of Gaylord. This consists
of a two-acre park located on the south side of Fourth Street
adjacent to the Gaylord community schools.
This park is a
small, wooded, pleasant park but . does not provide any facilities. Although there are many recreational outlets for the
population of Gaylord, there are no close-in recreational
spaces. There. is one nine-bole golf course open to the general public just ioµth of the city on Old Hiihway 27. Both
Otsego County and the State of Michigan operate parks on
Otsego Lake, however, they . are primarily __canip1.ng areas. The
City of Gail6rd has a totally inadequate park and recreational
program, even for a community of its size. · A .de_termined effort must be made to develop a ·'proper park system in the future.
School Facilities
The Gaylord _Community School District is _one of the
larger school districts within the county and provides both
elementary and secondary education. The district operates
one school site located within the City of Gaylord, generally
on the south side of Fourth Street and east of Elm Avenue.
The present facilities include an elementary school, which was
built in 1957 and enlarged in 1964. Grades K-6 are taught in
24 classrooms within this school. The school has a total capacity for 720 students, compared to a 1964-1965 enrollment

�- 38 of 658 students•.
This represents an enrollment under-capacity
of 62 students. Also located on the 40-acre site is the
school district's junior and senior high school. Major additions were made in 1964 to the building, which was originally
constructed in 1951. Both the junior grades, -7 through 9, and
senior grades 10 through 12 are taught in the school's 32
classrooms. This facility has a total capacity for 960 students, compared to a present enrollment of 509 showing an excess capacity within this school for 451 students.
The trends in public school enrollments in the Gaylord
School District over the past ten years are shown in the following table:
Year
1951-52
1955-56
1956-57
1957-58
1958-59
1959-60
1960-61
1961-62
1962-63
1963-64
1964-65

I

I

I

I
I

K-6

Grades
7-8
9-12

K-12

452
504
486
491
524
566
561
663
675
674
658

104
130
141
120
126
153
156
153
131
153
177

204
224
205
210
256
283
302
333
315
336
332

760
858
832
821
906
1005
1019
1149
1121
1163
1187

School enrollments have increased nearly every year since the
1951-1952 school year, from 760 in the 1951-52 school year to
1,187 in the 1964-65 school year.
A fairly uniform increase
in enrollment has taken place in all grades - elementary, junior, and senior. Elementary enrollments have increased from
452 to 658 during the 10-year period. Similarly, junior enrollments have increased fr6m 104 to 177, and senior enrollments
have increased from 204 to 332. This represents a 25 percent
increase in elementary enrollments, a 73 percent increase in
junior enrollments, and a 58 percent increase in senior high
school enrollments during the past 10 years.
Projections of future school enrollments indicate a total
of 2,400 students for the entire county, an increase of 600
students over the current county-wide enrollments.
It is expected that the Gaylord Community School District will receive
a greater part of these increased school enrollments, or approximately 520 additional students.
It is estimated that elementary enrollments in grades K-6 will represent 59 percent of the
enrollment, grades 7 and 8 will represent 60 percent of the

�I
I
I
I
I
,I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

39 -

enrollment, and grades 9 through 12 will represent 25 percent
of the total enrollment. This breaks down to an increase over
current enrollments within the Gaylord Community School District of 310 elementary students, 100 junior students, and
110 senior students.
The St. Mary's School in Gaylord currently has an enrollment of 610 students in grades 1 through 12.
If St. Mary's
enrollment increases at approximately the same. percentage rate
as the public schools, there would be approximately 200 additional students by 1985. The plans for public schools for the
Gaylord area assume that this increase will occur.
Public Buildings
The Gaylord Municipal Building is located on Court Avenue
across from the county courthouse. The structure was built in
1912 and remodeled in 1949. The building is used for all of
the city governmental offices including police, justice court,
the city library, and an auditorium seating about 600 persons.
Fire trucks formerly housed in this building were moved recently to a different building. The building is in fair to
good structural condition, but would require extensive remodeling to provide the space and services required by the city. The
city offices are located on the first floor in an extremely
small area totally inadequate to provide efficiently the necessary city services. A large area on the second floor is devoted to an infrequently used auditorium seating about 600 persons and to a library. The space formerly used by the fire
trucks is not being utilized at the present time. The Gaylord
fire hall is located on the northwest corner of Otsego Avenue
and Second Street, where the city's two fire trucks were moved
recently. The building location and facilities are adequate
to serve Gaylord and the surrounding area since the fire hall
has immediate access to Otsego Avenue. This thoroughfare, in
turn, provides immediate access to the central business area
and to the industrial areas on the south side of the city, in
addition to having access to Main Street for the east and west
sides of the city.
There are a number of other public buildings located within the City of Gaylord that would have a definite effect upon
public building planning for the City of Gaylord. The county
courthouse was built in 1891; additions and improvements were
made in 1948 and again in 1951. The building is in fair to
good structural condition.
It is considered inadequate for
present and future county needs. The United States post office in Gaylord is located on the business district on the
west side of Court Avenue. The building and site are relatively new, but both are too small to provide adequate services to the present and future population.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.

I

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

- 40 The Otsego qounty Road Commission offices and garage
are located on Otsego Avenue south of the Gaylord business
district. The structure was built in 1940 and has major additions in 1964. The building is a modern facility, adequate
to meet the future needs of the road commission. The State
Conservation Department has a district office and central repair shop in two buildings on Otsego Avenue just north of the
County Road Commission building. The conservation department
also has a large storage yard adjacent to the road commission
storage yard. · Both ' of these operations are in a satisf~ctory
location in relation to developments in Gaylord. The Gaylord
State Police Post is located across the street from the conservation department building. These state and county functions are logically located within the city.
Community Facilities Plan
Long-range proposals for community facilities _. are . shown
on Plate 8. The community facilities plan proposed the utilmate development of three city parks, a new elementary school,
and considerable expansion of the sanitary sewer system and
water system. The various proposals are discussed in the
following:
Recreational Areas
The plan proposes the ultimate development of three recreational areas throughout the city. The present city park,
located on the south side of the city on Fourth Street, would
be expanded by approximately 30 acres. This park, the present
school site, and the proposed expansion area would provide a
total park area in excess of 70 acres. This park area would
be located on the proposed extension of Grandview Boulevard
into Hayes Road. This section of highway could be developed
in an attractive manner and would provide an excellent view
and appearance for this section of the city. This proposed
expansion area should contain a complete unit of . neighborhood
recreational facilities including playground equipment, hard
?urface courts, ball diamonds, and other active recreational
facilities.
A major feature of the recreation plan is a proposed 40acre educational and recreational site located on the west side
of Hayes Road. This site would serve as a location for a proposed elementary school and for city and county recreational
purposes.
It is recommended that the area be used as
neighborhood park for the area north of Main and east of the railroad tracks. This would include a complete contingent of
neighborhood recreational facilities similar to those proposed

a

�I
I
I

1 ·: ;.. .

-==.. .....

I

HIDDEN

7

y ·,Ul[Y
5KI
CLU &amp;

I
I
I

•
•
•
PROPOSED
I

FOR

SITE

CITY

E

PAR

AND

SCH
t 30 ACRES)

nr&lt;.tGO

COUNTY

Ala.POft.T'

ENDED
DDITION

COUQ.51{.

=1~~~g~4=::;=;===:J=

r
COMMUNITY

C.i'TY PHNN1NC, COMl•11S~ION
G AY~Ol0
t,,1 1(MIG'-N

FACILITIES

PLAN

-

PARKS, SCHOOLS, HOSPITALS
AND COURT HOUSE

D

ALL OTHER PUBLIC
PUBLIC USES
NEIGHBORHOODS

.._

NAlLAfllD IAl1HOtOw t w AND ,UJOCl,.TU
c:11••1•••1u.
Cl•llMA
l116&lt;
l• ·•~c,..,uo111Kn
1..iU lOl,111
Y •11U.
1. ' 4
111 11101,t•

AND

5EM I-

PLATE

8

�I

I
I
I

•
•

- 41 for the park to the south.
In addition, it is recommended
that this area be developed as a major athletic field for the
entire county, providing a large track, stands, field house
facilities within the elementary school, lighted ball diamonds,
tennis courts, and other bard surface courts for a complete
range of outdoor athletic facilities.
So as to properly serve the residential areas on the west
side of Gaylord, it is recommended that a 10-acre park be developed.
This area would be developed primarily with neighborhood facilities similar to those of the south neighborhood
park and the proposed neighborhood park on Hayes Road; equipment should include playground apparatus, a ball diamond, and
other such active recreational facilities.
Public Schools
A consolidated county-wide school district was proposed
as a part of the Otsego County Comprehensive Plan. The plan
recommended that the Gaylord High School serve as a county-wide
senior high school and that the other Gaylord, Johannesburg,
and Vanderbilt schools provide only elementary and junior high
education. Projections for public schools indicate that there
will be an additional 300 elementary students by 1985, meaning
that the Gaylord schools will have approximately 950 elementary students. This is too large an enrollment for one elementary school; therefore, the plan recommends that a second
elementary school be built in the proposed site on Hayes Road.
This new school would also be in an area where considerable
population growth is anticipated.
The junior and senior high school facilities would be contained in the present junior and senior facilities in the
Gaylord community school site. Total enrollment at the high
school would be approximately 900 students, including the
Gaylord junior high school students and the county-wide senior
high school students.
The county comprehensive plan recommended that consideration be given to the establishment of a vocational school. The
population of Otsego County may not be large enough to support
such a facility, but the combined population of Otsego County
and several of the adjoining counties would be sufficient for
such support.
It was also suggested that Gaylord would be a
logical location for such a vocational school.
It is recommended that this facility be developed on the same site with
the junior and senior high school, with the vocational school
generally fronting on the proposed extension of Grandview
Boulevard •

�- 42 Proposed City-County Building

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

The present municipal building, the county courthouse and
the post office in Gaylord are considered to be functionally
obsolete and inadequate for their intended purposes.
In coordination with the Comprehensive Plan for Otsego County, the
Gaylord Comprehensive Plan recommends the development of a
city-county building, which would house all of the functions
of the present municipal building and the courthouse. A study
of space requirements indicates that the proposed building
should provide approximately 60,000 square feet of floor space
for all municipal and county functions.
If the space needs of
the building exceed 60,000 square feet, the jail or other
functions should be developed on another site. ·
The functions of the large, generally unusable courtroom
in the courthouse and the sizeable auditorium in the municipal
building could be combined into a new modern courtroom and
large meeting room in the new building.
In addition to this,
a smaller meeting room would be necessary for the Board of
Supervisors and the City Council meetings. At least one other
small meeting room should be made available to serve the needs
of both the city ~nd the county. The library should also be
located in this building. It is expected that fire protection
equipment would remain in the present fire hall. In general,
complementary functions such as the sheriff and city police
should be able to achieve a better degree of cooperation by
being located in the same building. The combination of both
city and county offices would enable a dual utilization of
space, permitting a more efficient operation of both governments than could be realized in the present old buildings.
The plan strongly recommends construction of a new citycounty building on the present site of the county courthouse.
Unique advantages of the site include its location in the
Gaylord central business district, making the building convenient to those people in the area of greatest activity in
the county; its positive effect of bringing additional people
into the business area who may shop while attending to other
affairs; and its possession of an open green area. The open
space lends a special attractiv·eness to the business area,
giving it a unique and exquisite characteristic : lacking in
many other central districts.
One possible disadvantage in using the site in this manner is that the area could provide space for additional parking and business. This is a minor consideration however because of the inherint aesthetic value of the open space. The
development of this site for business use might even prove to
be a detriment to the business area since the district would
then lose one of its best features. A summary of existing and
proposed community facilities is shown in Table 8.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1·

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 43 Table 8
EXISTING AND PROPOSED COMMUNITY FACILITIES
Gaylord, Michigan

Area of Site in Acres
Existing
Proposed
Total

Type of
Facility

Year
Built

Use of
Facility

Municipal
Building

1912
(1949)

Offices,
Auditorium,
Library and
Police

0.1

Site to be
abandoned

Post Office

1952

U. s. Post
Office

0.1

0.1

Courthouse

1891

County
Offices

2.1

2.1

Proposed
City-County
Building

Fire Hall

City and
County
Offices,
Auditorium,
Library,and
Police
1935

City Park

Use the present
Courthouse site

Houses two
fire trucks

0.3

0.3

Passive park
with no
facilities

2.0

2.0

Gaylord
Elementary

1957
(1964)

24 Classrooms

Gaylord High

1951
(1964)

32 Classrooms

On same site
as above

Proposed City
Park &amp; School
Site on Hayes
Road

A complete
athletic field
and elementary
school

40.0

40.0

Propes ed West
Neighborhood
Park

Recreational
facilities

10.0

10.0

40.0

30.0

70.0

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

-

45 -

REGULATORY MEASURES
Zoning Regulations
The control of land use through zoning is a vital portion of city planning if the community is to avoid a chaotic
pattern of intermingled residential, commercial, and industrial uses.
Land use and the intensity of development form
the basic community pattern; their harmonious relationship is
an essential beginning step in the creation of a satisfactory
city.
Gaylord bas enjoyed the protection and guidance afforded
by comprehensive zoning since 1946. The present ordinance has
been amended in some minor respects, but it essentially has remained unchanged since adoption.
The basic objectives of zoning have not substantially changed in recent years, even though
there have been improvements in zoning techniques and a broader
legal support for some of the aspects of zoning. Zoning is
still concerned with three types of regulations; namely, the
use of land and buildings, the amount of open space that must
be provided around buildings, and the maximum height of buildings.
Although modern ordinances generally require the provision of space for off-street parking, this requirement is
closely associated with the provision of front, side, and rear
yards.
Practically all ordinances also regulate the intensity
of land use and buildings or the density of population by specifying the number of families that may occupy a lot of acertain size.
Gaylord's zoning ordinance was authorized under an Enabling
Act adopted by the State Legislature. Act 207, which is still
in effect with little or no modification since its original
passage, is similar in most respects to zoning enabling legislation adopted by other states. The language of the act clearly
defines the major principles that should be considered when preparing and adopting a zoning ordinance.
The original zoning ordinance in Gaylord was prepared without the benefit of a plan for future land use.
Such a plan has
been prepared as a part of the current program in Gaylord, and
the zoning ordinance will be a principal means of impiementing
and carrying out this plan.
For that reason, if for no other,
it is necessary to prepare a new zoning ordinance based upon
up-to-date information, the provisions of the land use plan,
and the newer techniques that have been developed in recent
years.
Zoning is accomplished by dividing the community into districts such as residential, commercial and industrial.

�I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

-

46 -

The first pur~ose of zoning is to direct the growth of
the community in accordance with a comprehensive plan.
Since
the use of urban land is dependent upon the arrangement of
such physical facilities -as highways, schools, and parks, the
zoning regulations sho~ld · b~ a part of a plan dealing with all
of these facilities.
Under a good zoning ordinance, urban
growth will arrange itself according to a pattern of land use
that will fit into a comprehensive plan, resulting in maximum
benefit to the entire county. There is a close relationship
between the ·land use arrangement and the provision of needed
public facilities such as schools. For example, it is most
difficult to design a highway system in the absence of a general plan. The land use plan provides the basis for the
zoning district map.
The second purpose of zoning is to encourage the most
appropriate use of land. Zoning must be reasonable. The future use of property permitted must be related to the existing
development.
In drafting an ordinance, consideration must be
given to the character of the district and its peculiar suitability for particular uses. Of greatest importance, however,
is the necessity for the regulations to encourage the most appropriate use of land. The zoning regulations should be based
upon the· interests of the entire community - of all the people rather than upon the value or use of one or two individual
pieces of land. Zoning is more than just a few rules to keep
one man from unduly damaging the value of his neighbor's property.
It is a directive force to encourage the development of
the best possible community.
The third purpose of zoning is to provide adequate light
and air, to prevent over-crowding of the land, and to avoid
undue concentration of population. · This is not too difficult
a problem in Otsego County.
The fourth purpose of zoning is to conserve and protect
property values. For example, in a residential area a few
lots might bring a much higher price if they could be used for
commercial purposes. Such a use, however, would depreciate
rather than conserve the value of the existing buildings in
the particular area.
When there is no zoning to prevent each individual from
doing just as he pleases with his property, the different
types of land use - residence, industry and commerce - become
intermingled, damaging one another and the community as a
whole. No one wants to build a residence or summer home and
then find the adjacent lot used as a soap factory or as a junk
yard.
While this is a most extreme example, there is no question but that industrial or commercial use adversely affects

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

47 -

-

•

•
•

adjacent residential property.
In addition, one type of residential property has an adverse effect on another. For example, when a single-family lake residential area is invaded by
some rental cottages, the value of the single-family area for
its original purpose is reduced because, over a long period,
rental property depreciates at a faster rate than does owneroccupied property.
Existing Ordinance
As previously stated, Gaylord adopted its present zoning
ordinance in 1946. The ordinance divides the city into eight
districts:
three residential districts, one agricultural district, three commercial districts, and one industrial district.
Within each of the several districts, the use of land and
buildings is regulated, minimum setbacks are established for
front yards, and minimum rear and si_d e yards are required.
Minimum lot areas and dimensions are specified, but there are
no height regulations; this omission indicates that the ordinance is not fully comprehensive.
In addition to the use and
area regulations, the ordinance sets out certain definitions,
adopts the zoning map by reference, and describes how district
boundaries are to be interpreted. The ordinance also provides
for enforcement of the ordinance and creates a Board of Appeals.
The present ordinance does not truly provide the desirable
controls under present-day conditions. There have been many
changes in land uses since the ordinance was adopted, and these
changing trends should be recognized.
Specifically, the following deficiencies are noted:
1.

Definitions of terms should be expanded to recognize certain new types of land use such as clinics,
modern filling stations, off-street parking and
loading spaces, motels, nursing homes, and trailers.

2.

The "R-211 and "R-3" Residential Districts are
nearly identical and do not materially assist in
providing purposeful zoning controls. The "H-1"
and "H-2" Highway Service Districts are also nearly
identical.

3.

The area and yard regulations are scattered throughout the ordinance, in Article IV, and in the various
use districts •

4.

The ordinance does not have a section on compliance
with the regulations to make the requirements of the
ordinance clearly mandatory •

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

•

•II

- 48 -

5.

The resid~ntial districts permit certain types
of institutions and other uses that should only
be allowed by special use permit.

6.

The ordinance does not contain a special use
section to provide for the proper location of
unusual land uses such as cemeteries, trailer
parks, junk yards, and similar problematic
uses that should be reviewed prior to their
establishment.

7.

The uses permitted in the various districts
are not well selected and do not properly relate to one another. Also, certain commercial
uses such as retail stores, are not permitted
in the "H-1" or "H-2" Highway Service districts.

8.

The ordinance is deficient in not requiring offstreet parking to be provided in all districts
other than in the central business district.

The above are the principal defects of the present ordinance and, while they could be remedied by amending the present
ordinance, there are so many changes which should be made the
piecemeal amendment procedure would be very cumbersome.
It is
concluded that it would be far better to draft and adopt an
entirely new ordinance than to attempt to amend the present
one.
Proposed Zoning Regulations
The text and district maps of a proposed zoning ordinance
were submitted in the preliminary report. The proposed ordinance was coordinated and patterned to the regulations for
Otsego County. The purpose of the ordinance is to establish
controls on the use of land, the size of lots, front, side and
rear yards, a minimum dwelling size, and parking space. The
zoning ordinance consists of written text and a zoning district
map.
(See Plate 9.)
The intent of the ordinance is to insure the general orderly growth of the city, to insure proper development in the
future, to protect the values of land and property, and to assure the most appropriate use of land.
Districts.
follows:

The city is divided into five districts as
R-1
R-2
C-1
C-2
M-1

Single-Family Residence
Multiple Residence
General Commercial
Central Commercial
Manufacturing

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

H I D D (

I\,.

VALLEY

OTSlGO

COUNTY

AIRPOltT

- .2 ,

::

.L::-----,
'

-

--1

- -

-

••

•
•
•

ZONING
D
•

D\STR\CT

NONCONFORMING
NONCONFORMING

MAP

COMMERCIAL USES
INDUSTRIAL USES
PLATE 9

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

•
•
•
•
•
•

-

49 -

Use Regulations. The R-1 Single-Family Residence District permits single-family dwellings and certain other compatible uses such as schools, parks, churches, and home occupations. The R-2 Multiple Residence District permits the uses
allowed in R-1, plus two family and multiple dwellings, clubs,
and hospitals. The C-1 General Commercial District allows
almost all types of commercial uses, including retail service
and office uses, drive-in establishments, parking facilities
and signs. The C-2 Central Commercial District applies only
to the central business area.
Permitted uses are the same as
in the C-2 District, plus wholesale establishments and terminals
and limited manufacturing. This district is exempted from
parking requirements.
The M-1 Manufacturing District allows
any type of commercial or industrial use (with the exception
of Council review of certain obnoxious uses). Residential uses
are prohibited.
Special Uses.
The City Council and the planning commission may permit by special permit, cemeteries, drive-in theaters, golf courses, institutions, trailer parks, and junk yards
in certain districts where they are not regularly allowed.
Area Regulations.
All new buildings in every district
must have a minimum front yard of 25 feet except in the C-2
District. Rear yards of 25 feet and side yards of five to
ten feet are required, depending upon the district.
Side
yards are not necessary in the C-1 and C-2 districts, except
where they abut an R District.
A minimum lot of 8,500 square
feet and minimum lot width of 60 feet are required for singlefamily residential uses in the Rand C districts. Two-family
dwellings must provide 2,500 square feet and 1,500 square feet
is required for each multiple unit. Every dwelling unit is
required to have a minimum ground floor area of 480 square
feet.
These area regulations do not apply to existing buildings.
The ordinance also contains provisions for making reasonable adjustments to these regulations where there are unusual existing conditions. These area regulations are minimum
standards; larger lots and yards, of course, are permitted.
Any lot existing at the present time, regardless of size, may
be used as only new lots must observe these minimum areas .
Height. The height of all new buildings must not exceed
two and one-half stories or 35 feet in all districts, except
in the C-2 and M-1 districts where the maximum height is eight
stories or 100 feet for new buildings. These regulations do
not apply to existing buildings •
Board of Appeals.
Appeals may be made to an Appeal Board
for errors or for hardships.
All new buildings or additions
to existing buildings must obtain a permit. Permit fees are

�I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

•
•

- 50 $3.00 for improvements up to $2,000 in valuation, and $0.50
for each additional $1,000 valuation. Any improv·ement under
$200 has no fee.
Amendments. The City Council may amend and change the
zoning ordinance and the district maps. Before any amendment
may be made, the proposed amendment must be submitted to the
planning commission for its consideration and a public hearing.
The amendment procedure is the same as that used in adopting
the ordinance.
Subdivision Regulations
Any physical expansion of a community is primarily accomplished by the development of new subdivisions of land. The
process of platting new streets, blocks and lots establishes
a pattern which firmly attaches itself to the land and thereafter is difficult to change or alter. Therefore, it is essential that the process of subdividing land be subject to reasonable public regulations and control so that the pattern of
development is properly related to the overall community plan.
The procedure will protect the interes~ .of the prospective
purchaser, the developer , and the city. The creation of new
subdivisions often offers opportuniti~s for implementing various proposals of the comprehensive plan such as the location
of major thoroughfares and sites for schools, parks, and other
public facilities.
Subdivision Planning
Subdivision regulations are one of the most important
tools available to implement the Comprehensive Plan of Gaylord
and to assure orderly growth in the community. The City of
Gaylord has the authority to control the subdivision of land
in the corporate limits and within the unincorporated territory,
as established in Michigan Statutes.
The planning commission is vested with the responsibility
of reviewing new subdivisions.
This power of review is established through the adoption and enforcement of subdivision
regulations by the City Council.
Subdivision regulations are
concerned with standards of design, standards of minimum physical improvements, the procedures to be followed, and information required to be shown on a preliminary and final plat.
It
is in the public interest to require that the developer provide
certain minimum physical improvements in accordance with applicable standards of the city to prevent premature placement
of public facilities and excessive maintenance costs, as well
as to safeguard the public health and interes t .
·

�- 51 -

I
I

-I
I

•I
I

I
I
I
I
I

Upon adoption , of the subdivision regulation ordinance by
the City Council, the planning commission will be required to
review each new subdivision.
This offers an excellent opportunity for the city to apply sound planning principles in the
development of areas.
It is important that specific standards be available to use in appraising the merit of each proposal.
The creation of a new subdivision is usually the first
step in the development or the expansion of a residential
neighborhood. As each parcel of land is developed, it should
be oriented to the neighborhood and must become an integral
part of it. The land use plan bas identified several neighborhoods in Gaylord, the focus of which is upon a combined
elementary school and neighborhood park.
Future streets within the neighborhood should be so arranged as to discourage
through traffic. Whenever physically possible, major streets
should border the neighborhood rather than penetrate it.
In
this way, pedestrians are protected from the dangers of vehicular traffic and residences are protected from the noise, dust
and nuisance of through traffic. Attention should be given to
the location of churches, clubs, lodges, public buildings, and
public and semi-public open spaces.
If these are located in
the neighborhood, they should be provided with large sites,
and the buildings shou l d be insulated from surrounding residences with adequate setback for landscaping.
Certain basic principles of planning standards should be
observed whether a proposed subdivision is built by a single
developer or by many separate developers over a period of years.
Attention should be given to the physical characteristics of
the topography of the area under consideration. Natural features should be preserved. Minor streets should enter major
streets at right angles to avoid traffic hazards.
Whenever
possible, streets should follow main drainage lines. Dead-end
streets should be avoided, except where needed to connect to
a future development of adjacent property.
Lots should be
adjusted to obtain maximum frontage on existing and proposed
open spaces.
Proposed Subdivision Regulations
The text of the proposed subdivision regulations were
submitted in the preliminary report.
The proposed ordinance
was coordinated and patterned to the regulations prepared for
Otsego County. This proposed ordinance sets out in detail
the procedures for the subdivision of land. After careful review by the planning commission, the recommended regulations
should then be prepared in proper legal form by the City Attorney for adoption by the City Council.

�II
II
II

-II

II

I

II

- 52 -

The City Engineer is the official responsible for administration of the subdivision ordinance, and the ordinance
provides that copies of the preliminary plan be filed with
him.
A public hearing before the planning commission is then
scheduled. The City Engineer submits a report upon the preliminary plan to the planning commission, and the commission
then approves, modifies or disapproves the plan.
Upon approval of the preliminary plan, the subdivider may
then prepare the final plat along with the detailed specifications for required improvements.
A performance bond is filed
with the final plat to insure that the required improvements
will be made. This performance bond is returned to the subdivider when the City Engineer certifies that the required
improvements have been made.
The ordinance prescribes minimum standards and requirements which are necessary for good subdivision design.
Such
items as minimum specifications for street and street arrangement, lot sizes, easements, and the like are included~ Additional requirements pertaining to land for parks are included.
When public property is to be provided, a time period is specified during which the appropriate agency may purchase the land.
The required improvements may be provided by the subdivider upon receiving a signed copy of the preliminary plan. The
required improvements include permanent markers, streets, sidewalks, water lines, sanitary sewers, and storm drainage.

I
I

Provision is made for maintenance or improvements outside
the corporate limits when the municipality is unable to maintain them or does not wish to do so. Deed restrictions will
insure that utility systems, park areas, trees and other necessary and desirable physical facilities will be cared for by lot
owners in the subdivision. The ordinance also contains sections
for general administration, on variations and exceptions, violations and penalties, validity and the repeal of conflicting
ordinances. The ordinance may be amended from time to time by
the City Council if this becomes necessary in the future.

�•
•

- 53 PUBLIC UTILITIES
Water is the most essential utility provided by the municipality with its direct impact on the health, commerce and general well-being of the citizens.
In addition to its primary
life-sustaining function, water is essential for sanitation,
commerce and industry, and for fire protection. The availability of an adequate and dependable wat~r supply often has a
great bearing on the growth and prosperity of a community.
The various facilities that make up a water system; supply
works, treatment facilities, pumping facilities, transmission
and distribution mains, storage facilities, hydrants, valves,
etc., represent a large long-term capital investment and, as
such, require careful long-range planning to provide adequate
service to an increasing population in the most economical manner.
A complete sanitary sewage system consists of facilities
for collection, pumping, treatment, and disposal of domestic
and industrial wastes. The problem of pollution of our natural
resources is finally beginning to receive the widespread concern that it has so long deserved. The urbanization trend and
increase in population necessitates the proper removal and disposal of domestic and industrial wastes to avoid any possibility
of wholesale contamination of water supply and resultant hazards
to the community health.
The primary function of an urban storm sewer system is to
reduce or eliminate accidents and property damage due to local
floods and water flooding.
Storm sewers also assist in the
maintenance of efficient and safe vehicular and pedestrian
traffic movement and eliminate the health and safety hazards
accompanying pooled water. Advance planning enables the city
to provide for increased storage run-off which is an inevitable
result of urban development. As more streets, parking lots,
and other relatively impervious features replace the original
undeveloped countryside, the percentage of run-off from a
given rainfall may increase as much as fivefold or possibly
more.
Existing Facilities
The City of Gaylord's existing water system consists of
two wells with high discharge head turbine pumps as sources of
supply; a distribution system ·of two, four, and six-inch mains;
and a 54,000 gallon elevated storage tank.
Maintenance facilities are located at the south well house. The north well

�- 54 -

I

I
I
I

located on Otsego Avenue consists of a 16-inch gravel packed
well with a high discharge turbine pump.
Under normal operation or auxiliary power, the well's capacity is 310 gallons
per minute. The south well is located on Center Avenue and
is a remodeled dug well with a high discharge head turbine
pump. From the best information available, it is estimated
that the well has a 350 gallon. per minute capacity. The existing storage tank located on south Center Avenue has a capacity for 54,000 gallons. Although adequate when originally
constructed, this tank does not satisfy the present needs of
the City of Gaylord. The distribution system is comprised of
six-inch wooden feeder mains along Center Avenue, Otsego Avenue, and Main Street. The feeder mains are connected by a
two a-n d four-inch distribution network. The distribution network is comprised of wood, cast iron, cement, asbestos, and
galvanized iron mains. Recent water main installations in the
new subdivisions consist primarily of four-inch cement asbestos
pipe.
The adequacy of the present distribution system is definitely substandard.
In the northwest section of the city,
which is beginning to develop into a residential area, there
has already been experiences of low pressure. The low pressure
is caused by attempting to supply too many people with a 4,000
foot long four-inch main. As with many old distribution systems, the City of Gaylord's network has developed many serious
leakage problems.
It is apparent from the report prepared on
"Water Supply, Distribution, and Storage", February, 1965, by
George E. Synder and Associates, that there are many inadequacies in the present water system of the City of Gaylord and
many improvements are needed to place the system in proper
order to serve the present population. As the community grows
in the future, additional facilities must be developed for
this new population.
Gaylord's sanitary sewer system p~ovides service to all
of the present urban development. The system flows by gravity
to the oxidation ponds and treatment facilities located in the
southeast corner oi the city. The system is connected to the
treatment facilities by a 14-inch trunk line which generally
follows Seventh Street and Court Avenue north to a point approximately one block north of Main Street. The collection
system is in three basic parts, with all the system east of
Elm connected to the 14-inch main at Fourth and the central
area east of the tracks connected at - multiple points with the
14-inch trunk line. The western collection network is also
connected to the 14-inch trunk main and_ crosses the railroad
tracks at Fourth Street. This westerly system has a pump
house on Main Street near Ohio Avenue. Nearly all of tbe local service lines are of an 8-inch size. Gradients are relatively low due to the level topography of the city.

�'-I
I
I
I
I

....
r,I

HIDDEN

"'::,

VALLEY

0

CLUE

5KI

..J
L--

-

0

--

~ -'"' ITO .,_ IU M

-

-

1

M-32.

"I
II
II
I

II
II
II
II

-

r-

i
OTSEGO

COUNTY

j
AIRPOR.T

JI: ·

ti

~ ~·E·~

,
=·

-

_-

~,•

1

--~ly .
••••••C

1-------------i

1t • \I

-

" "

•

; ]71---'-- - - i

Alt...EAS 5E~VED l)Y SE.WE~
AND WATE~ 5YSTEM5
-

r-----.1
e
0

AR..EAS PR..E.SE.NTLY StP--.YED ~y
SE.WE P-... AND WAT E. P-... LIN E. S.
AR..EAS TO ~E. SE!&lt;....VED l)Y St.WEil-..
A ND WA H I&lt;... L I N E5 I N TH I:. FllTU R..E. .
WATEP--.. STOil-AG!:. FACILITIES
SE.WE.GE TR..E.ATME.NT PLANT
PLATE 10

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I

- 55 -

•

The storm drainage system in Gaylord does not provide
for proper removal of surface water.
A very limited and inadequate system of underground lines serves the central part
of the city, generally around the business district on Main
Street. A 14-inch line runs from the oxidation ponds to
Seventh Street. From Seventh Street, a 1O-inch line runs to
Fourth Street and a series of 8-inch lines connect with the
catch basins in the central business area.
Only five intersections on Main Street are provided with catch basins. All
other areas in the community are primarily served by surface
drainage facilities with storm water handled through curbs
and gutters, ditches, and by natural flow.
The level terrain
of the city is not suited to this type of a system. There
are frequent instances of ponding water throughout the city
following heavy rainfall or during periods of melting snow.
Therefore, the city faces a major improvement program if
proper storm drainage is to be provided.
Future Requirements

I

I
I

The master plan for Gaylord's water distribution system
calls for a three-phase development program. Phase I of the
program would consist of the replacement of all wood water
mains, construction of an elevated 300,000 gallon storage
tank, and the addition of one well. These improvements are
based upon the needs of the present population. The Phase II
improvements include the replacement of under-sized mains
(less than four inches in diameter) and the addition of several new mains to strengthen the distribution network.
These
proposed improvements are based upon the present needs of the
city; however, they are separated from Phase I to accommodate
financial considerations and implementation. The Phase III
improvements are designed to satisfy the requirements of the
future city. These improvements include the expansion of the
supply system, a 500,000 gallon elevated storage tank, and an
expanded distribution system.
Compact urban growth in and around Gaylord should be encouraged in accordance with the land use plan. One of the
reasons for this suggested type of development is to allow
for the economic and adequate provision of water supply to
the residential, commercial, and industrial areas.
The areas
presently served by the water system and the areas requiring
service in the future are illustrated on Plate 1O,as are the
areas requiring sanitary sewer service in the future.
The American Engineering Company has prepared some preliminary plans for the expansion of the sanitary sewer system
and for the development of an adequate storm sewer system.

�- 56 -

Relatively limited additional facilities are needed to complete the sanitary sewer system for present development. The
plans call for a proposed 10-inch sanitary sewer line to run
from the oxidation ponds westerly along Grandview Boulevard,
northerly along Wisconsin Street to Petoskey Street, and then
northerly along Ohio Avenue to North Street. This proposed
line would have a grade of 0.5 percent and would not require
pumping facilities.
Several other minor 8-inch line extensions are proposed in the plan. As future development takes
place, it will be necessary to extend the present sanitary
sewer system into these areas, primarily with 8-inch service
lines.
The majority of the areas requiring future service,
as shown on Plate 10,are to the northeast and northwest. The
area to the northeast may require added trunk line facilities
to the treatment plant; however, such a requirement would be
a number of years in the future.

I

The storm sewer system will require considerable improvement and the expenditure of large sums of money in the future.
The plan, as prepared by American Engineering Company, proposes
three main trunk lines serving three separate areas of Gaylord,
generally similar to the storm sewer service districts. A 66inch line would run from the treatment plant to Seventh Street.
A proposed 48-inch line would follow Center Street, extending
north to serve all of the areas east of Elm. A 54-inch line
would connect with the 66-inch line on Seventh Street and serve
all of the area in the central part of the city north to the
hospital. The developments west of the railroad tracks would
be connected by a 60-inch line and a 48-inch line with a crossing at Fourth Street. The smallest storm sewer in the proposed
system would be· 12-inch storm mains with a minimum gradient of
0.2 percent. The system is designed for a five-year frequency
and would be adequate to properly drain the present developed
areas of the city. As the residential areas to the northwest
and northeast develop, this system would have to be extended
into these areas. The system is designed so that it would be
adequate to handle the extensions into these areas in the
future.

�'

- 57 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
The proposals in the Gaylord Comprehensive Plan are indeed expensive, for all the proposals are needed improvements.
It would be impossible for the city to finance them all within
the first few years. To effectuate the plan implementation
for maximum benefit according to a cost schedule which the
citizens of Gaylord can afford, it is necessary to determine
the priorities and estimated costs of the various proposed
projects and then prepare a financial plan for their development. The priorities schedule will assure the development of
the most · urgent improvements and, combined with the cost schedule, will assure a financial plan which Gaylord can afford.
Present hlunicipal Finances
Prior to the formation of a six-year capital improvement
program, it is necessary to review the past and present level
of municipal finance.
Such is the purpose of the following
text and tables.
The cost of government in the City of Gaylord has increased steadily in recent years. Total revenues increased
from $136,000 in 1960-61 to $166,000 in 1964-65. Property
taxes have been the greatest source of revenue for the city
over the years, representing 35 percent of total revenues in
1960 and 38 percent of total revenues in 1964. An important
source of revenue for the city is the returned taxes from the
state which generally represent nearly one-third of revenue
sources. In 1960-61, state motor vehicle tax returns were
$21,000 and increased to $27,000 in 1964-65. The sales tax
diversion increased from some $17,000 to $21,000 during this
same period of time. Trends in municipal revenues are shown
in Table 9.
Municipal expenditures are shown in Table 10 for the years
1960 through 1965. The expenditures have increased and paralled revenues, increasing from $147,000 in 1960-61 to $153,000
in 1964-65. General government and general street maintenance
are the categories that required the greatest expenditures of
money, each representing approximately 30 percent of total expenditures. As would be expected, police, fire, and sanitation and health are the next largest categories. During the
five-year period shown on Table 10,the costs of government in
Gaylord remained relatively uniform.
If the capital outlay
totals are subtracted, the costs of government have ranged
from $132,000 to $148,000, with an outlay of $147,000 in 1960
and an outlay of $148,000 in 1964-65. Although costs of

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-I
'I
'
''

- 58 -

Table 9
MUNICIPAL REVENUES
Gaylord, Michigan

1960-61

1961-62

1962-63

1963-64

1964-65

$ 48,004

$ 58,249

$ 62,310

$ 62,894

$ 65,003

3,090

3,107

3,107

3,107

3,132

Sales Tax
Diversion

16 I 906

16,942

18,361

19 l 516

21,327

State Motor
Vehicle Tax

21,973

22,059

24,408

25,912

27,323

Liquor Licenses

1,993

1,974

2,010

2,549

2,517

Court Fines
(No Costs)

2,286

2,709

3,076

4,005

5,224

State Highway
Maintenance

8,069

12,550

9,084

6,946

10,841

All Other
Receipts

34,549

34,317

28,315

42,867

30,795

Total

$136,870

$151,907

$150,671

$167,796

$166,072

Property Taxes
Intangibles Tax

Source:

City Manager's Office

�-II
~

1:
I'
'
II
'
"
'-

Table 10
,1 ·

MUNICIPAL EXPENDITURES
Gaylord, Michigan

1960-61

1961-62

1962-63

1963-64

1964-65

$ 38,842

$ 37,251

$ 40,919

$38,941

$ 42,624

19,201

19,909

20,335

18,598

21,171

5,586

. 3;951

.. 4,904

4,316

5,674

Sanitation
and Health

27,072

7,463

19,430

15,714

16,799

General Streets

38,616

45,531

39,790

38,874

41,611

Library

2,500

2,500

2,500

2,500

2,500

Parks and
Recreation

1,748

1,541

2,090

1,365

858

Cemetery

4,179

4,300

4,234

4,477

5,043

Street Lights

4,352

5,077

7,633

7,963

7,975

Public Works

4,699

4,122

3,781

4,030

4,536

18,628

15,456

25,633

3 2 935

$150,273

$161,072

$162,411

$152,726

General
Government
Police
Fire (Including
Hydrant Rental)

Capital Outlay
Total

Source:

$146,795

City Manager's Office

�•

- 60 governmental operation has increased as have other costs, the
cost of government has been held at a relatively uniform level.
Although the amount of revenue has increased during recent years, it is apparent that there will not be an excess of
revenues over expenditures for direct operation.
The costs
of general government, protection of persons and property, and
maintenance of streets are major financial requirements of the
community. Although revenues will continue to increase in the
future, it is expected that similar increases will take place
in the level of expenditures. This indicates that major public improvements in Gaylord can only be financed through the
issuance of obligation bonds.
The assessed valuation of Gaylord in 1960 was 4.8 million
dollars and has been increasing steadily during the past five
years.
In 1965, the total assessment for real and (Table 11)
personal property was 6.6 million dollars. The per capita
valuation has also increased steadily from $1,886 in 1960 to
$2,298 in 1965. The assessed valuation of property in the
city determines the amount of money that can be raised through
a given tax levy and the bonded indebtedness the city may incur. This indebtedness is set by the state statutes at 12
percent of equalized assessed valuation. Thus, assessed valuation largely determines the amount of income available to
the community for the development of public improvements.
In
Gaylord, the Charter states that the total bonded indebtedness
of the community is limited to 10 percent of the assessed valuation. Table 12 indicates the total assessed value for the
years 1960 through 1965. The estimated bonding power at 10
percent of assessed value is shown in the second column.
In
1960, the bonding power of the city was $484,000 and increased
to $659,000 in 1965, During this period of time, there have
been no general obligation bonds outstanding; thus; the estimated bonding limit of the city in 1965 is $659,000,
The total tax rate for residents of Gaylord has varied
considerably during the past six years as indicated in Table 13.
In 1960, the total tax rate was $38,00 per $1,000 of assessed
valuation (state equalized). The highest tax rate was in 1961
at $40.82; however, the rate was reduced in 1965 to $32.93 per
$1,000 of assessed valuation. Although there have been some
fluxtuations in the total tax rate, the tax rate for the city,
county and the school operating taxes have remained relatively
uniform. The greatest fluctuations are found in the tax rate
levied for the school debt which has ranged from $3.06 to
$6.14. The tax rate in Gaylord is relatively nominal and an
increase in this tax rate for the purposes of retiring general obligation bonds would not be unwarranted or excessive .

�- 61 -

Table 11
TRENDS IN ASSESSED VALUES
Gaylord, Michigan

I
I

Total
Property

Assessed Value
Per Capita

693,525

4,844,905

1,886

3,978,550

680,050

4,658,600

1,773

1962

4,250,750

723,250

4,974,000

1,850

1963

4,300,300

757,500

5,057,800

1,840

1964

4,480,700

826,850

5,307,550

1,890

1965

5,531,700

1,057,900

6,589,600

2,298

Year

Real
Property

1960

4,151,380

1961

Note:
Source:

Personal
Property

Estimated Population Increase - 60 per year
City Manager's Office

�I
I
I
I

- 62 Table 12

ESTIMATED ao·NDING LIMITS

I

-I
-I
II

-

Gaylord, Michigan .

Assessed
Value

Year

1960

$ 4,844.905

1961

4,658,600

466,000

1962

4,974,000

497,000

1963

5,057,800

506,000

1964

5,307,550

531,000

1965

6,589,600 ,

659,000

1966

7,260,000 (2)

726,000

1967

7,931,000 (2)

793,000

1968

8,602,000 (2)

860,000

1969

9,273,000 (2)

927,000

1970

9,944,000 (2)

994,000

1971

10,615,000 (2)

1,062,000

$

484,000

(1)

Represents 10 Percent of Assessed Value by Charter.

(2)

Based on the 1961 to 1965 Trend of an Annual Average Increase of $671,000 in Assessed Value Per Year.

Source:

'

Estimated
Bonding
Limits (1)

City Manager's Office

�-

63 -

Table 13

TRENDS IN TAX RATES
Gaylord, Michigan
Tax Rate Per $1,000 of Assessed Valuation (State Equalized)

Governmental
Unit
City
County
School
Operating
School Debt

1965

1961

1962

1963

1964

10.00

12.50

12.50

12.50

12.50

11.99(1)

9.60

8.50

7.64

7.76

7.16

5.94(2)

12.80

14.16

13.12

12.42

12.70

11.63(2)

5.60

5.66

3.06

6.14

6.06

3.13(2)

Intermediate
School
Total Tax
Rate

-

1960

38.00

40.82

36.32

38.82

.24

.24

38.66

32.93

I
1.

City is shown on assessed valuation.
on State equalized valuation.

would be 12.50 for 1965

2.

County and School are shown on State equalized valuation.

�I
64 •·--

Based on the 1965 valuation, an increase in the tax rate of
$1.00 would produce a revenue of $6,589. A $3.00 increase in
the tax rate, which represents 10 percent of the 1965 rate,
would produce an annual increased revenue of $19,767. Over a
20-year period, this would make available nearly $400,000 for
purposes of retiring principal and interest on a general obligation bond issue.
There are several methods available to Gaylord for the
financing of various capital improvements; the most common
method is by issuing general obligation bonds. They are retired by special real estate tax levies; i.e., an increase in
the present city tax rate. The second method of financing
capital improvements is through the issuance of revenue bonds these are generally issued for the financing of self-supported
public enterprises, such as water systems, off-street parking
facilities, and the like. Funds for paying the interest and
retiring the bonds are derived from income produced by the
facilities. One of the advantages of these bonds is that they
do not come under _ the limitation on the general bonded indebtedness imposed by state law. Although the "pay-as-you-go"
method has been used by some cities, such a procedure would
not be possible in Gaylord, as it would be many years before
the city could accumulate a cash fund for the purposes of
providing major capital improvements. Special assessments
provide another method by which public improvements may be
financed. This is particularly well used in areas where a
certain segment of the community will benefit from a public
facility.
Under this procedure, the benefited property pays
for all or almost all of the cost improvement. This might be
used for minor street improvements or for extension of sanitary sewers with assessment against abutting property owners.
Similar procedures have often been used by establishing benefit assessment districts for central area parking lots.
Proposed Capital Improvement Program
The comprehensive plan presents a broad concept of improvements that should be developed in the City of Gaylord
during the next 20 years. A proposed capital improvement
program has been developed to provide those improvements most
needed in the immediate future, designed to meet the financial
abilities of the community. One of the serious problems in
Gaylord is that much of the physical plant is obsolete and
deteriorating. This is especially true of the various utility
systems - water, sanitary, and storm facilities. Thus, the
community is now faced with the need for a fairly extensive
improvement program. ( See Table 14)

�~ 65 -

The proposed program involves considerable improvements
to the water system, the provision of storm drainage for the
central part of the city, minor sanitary sewer improvements,
the development of off-street parking lots in the central area,
continuing street ' maintenance, and the city providing its share
for the proposed city-county building. The proposed program,
to be carried out during the six-year period from 1966 through
1971, aggregates a total of $1,284,000.
General obligation
bonds comprise only $486,000 of this total, with the balance
consisting of revenue bonds and other sources. The total program is well within the estimated bonding power of the City
of Gaylord. As pointed out previously, the city had, in 1965,
a bonding limit of $659,000 with no outstanding bonds.
Water System Improvements
The water system in Gaylord is in a critical state of
deterioration, thus, it is essential that major improvements
be made in the near future. The citizens of Gaylord have recognized this need and approved a bond issue of $300,000 in an
election in 1965.
In a master plan for water supply, distribution, and storage, prepared in February, 1965, estimates
were outlined for a three-phase improvement program. Phase I
would include the replacement of all wood water mains, the
development of an additional well, and the construction of an
elevated storage tank. Water main replacement would amount
to $155,000; a 300,000 gallon elevated storage tank would cost
an estimated $72,000; and the well and pump house would cost
an estimated $22,000. This would amount to a total estimated
cost of $286,000, including engineering and contingencies.
The recently approved $300,000 bond issue would be used to
cover the cost of these improvements.
In order to retire
these obligation bonds, a three mill tax levy will be required. This levy would produce approximately $19,000 which would
be adequate to cover the principal and interest debt requirement of a $286,000 bond issue.
The Phase II water improvement program includes the replacement of undersized mains and the construction of new
mains to strengthen and improve the system, including a feeder
main to the northwest section of the city from the existing
north well. The total cost of this project is estimated at
$180,000.
It is recommended that revenue bonds be issued for
the Phase II improvements, to be retired from water system
revenues.
It is estimated that the water bills provide an
excess over operation of $15,000 annually, based upon the recently increased rates. Depending upon the interest rates,
the $180,000 revenue bonds could be retired -in 16 to 20 years.

�-

66 -

Storm Sewers
One of the most critical problems in Gaylord is the
standing storm water situation that occurs throughout the
central portions of the city.
In conjunction with the widening and improvement -of J1iain Street, Michigan Highway 32, by
the Michigan Highway Department, a significant change in the
storm drainage system can be effected. The Highway Department will pay for the· proper drainage of this major_ thoroughfare, for storm water produced by the new highway surface.
However, the City of Gaylord must be prepared to provide the
necessary storm sewer system to remove this water from the
central part of the city. Initial estimates indicate a cost
of $400,000 for such a storm drainage facility.
It is possible that the cost to the community will not be as high as
$400,000, as the State Highway Department may assume part of
the cost.
The Economic Development Administration, authorized to
carry out the Economic Opportunity Act, will assume the responsibility of the accelerated public works program. The
City of Gaylord should be eligible for a 50 percent matching
federal grant of $200,000 through this agency for one-half
of the cost of the $400,000 storm sewer improvement.
It is
recommended that the remaining local share of $200,000 be
derived from two sources. First, the city could issue $100,000
in general obligation bonds to be retired by the proceeds from
an additional one mi~l tax levy. This additional levy would
probably not be required for two or three years until the
Highway 32 improvement is initiated. The remaining $100,000
could be financed through . the use of motor vehicle funds; It
is estimated that the city will receive $28,000 annually in
returned motor vehicle funds. If $12,000 is to be used for
continued street maintenance, then $12,000 could be used to
pay off certificates of indebtedness for the city's remaining
$100,000 local share of the storm sewage improvement. This
would commit a total of $24,000 of the annual motor vehicle
funds.
The remaining $4,000 should be placed in a reserve
sinking fund.
Sanitary Sewers
The recently .completed sanitary sewer inventory did not
specifically indicate needed sanitary sewer projects. However,
it is apparent that improvements to the present system will be
required during the next six years.
In view of the fact that
the present quarterly minimum sanitary sewer charge is relatively low at $1.50, it is recommended that the minimum charge
be increased to $3.00 per quarter and that all of the rates
be doubled across the board. Thus, the present annual income

�- 67 -

of $11,000 to $12,000 would be increased by a like amount.
The additional $12,000 could then be used to retire as much
as $170,000 in sanitary sewer revenue bonds. As an alternate,
the entire $12,000 could be used for sanitary system improvements each year during the six-year period, a total of approximately $70,000 in sanitary sewer improvements. The latter
method is suggested and is shown in Table 14. If an emergency
arises or a ~ajor improvement is required, revenue bonds could
be issued.
Parking Lots
The City of Gaylord recently created a Building Authority
in accordance with Michigan statutes.
This authority is also
functioning as the parking authority for the city.
Concurrent
with planning for the central area, the authority has selected
a series of parking lots and is in the process of acquiring
properties. The authority issued $175,000 in revenue bonds
and will, in turn, lease the parking lots to the city for an
annual rent of $12,000. This $12,000 will be used by the
authority to retire the revenue bonds. The City of Gaylord
has received a pledge from the merchants for $7,500 annually
for a period of 10 years, for a total of $75,000. The remaining $4,500 for the $12,000 annual lease will be taken from
parking meter revenues, which are currently providing approximately $6,000 to $7,000 per year.
The 280-meter parking spaces to be developed in the new
off-street parking lots, in addition to the present off-street
parking facilities, should be adequate to meet the needs of
the central business district during the six-year program
through 1971.
Municipal Offices
The City of Gaylord and Otsego County have recently established a joint City-County Building Authority for the purpose of developing a city-county building as proposed in the
comprehensive plans. The public buildings section of the
county comprehensive plan indicated an initial cost of $950,000
for the entire structure.
It is estimated that the City of
Gaylord would require between 4,000 and 5,000 square feet of
space.
Assuming a building cost of $20 per square foot, the
city should be prepared to assume a responsibility for $100,000.
Assuming an annual debt requirement or lease requirement of
$7,000, the city would only need to budget approximately $2,000
a year over the present costs of the municipal building.
Such
a building is several years off and, at that time, it may be
necessary to increase the tax levy by 0.3 mills. Further, it

�- 68 Table 14
PROPOSED SIX-YEAR CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM
Gaylord, Michigan

Total
Cost

Purpose
Water System Phase I
Water System Phase II
Storm Sewers
Sanitary Sewers
Parking Lots
Municipal _Offices
Continuing Street
Improvements

$

286,400

Parking Meter
Revenue
Bonds
$

100,000
175-000&lt; 2 &gt;

'

100,000

72,000
$1,283,000

Water
Charge
Revenue
Bonds

Water System Phase I
$
Water System Phase II
180,000
Storm Sewers
Sanitary Sewers
Parking Lots
Municipal Offices
Continuing Street
Improvements
TOTAL

$286,000(l)

180,000
400,000
70,000
175,000
100,000

TOTAL

Purpose

General
Obligation
Bonds

$180,000

$486,000

$175,000

Federal
Grants

Motor
Vehicle
Funds

Sanitary
Charge
Revenue
Bonds

$

$
200,000

100,000

70,000

72,000
$70,000

$200,000

$172,000

(1)

From Bond Issue of $300,000 approved in 1965 election.

(2)

Revenue Bonds obtained in 1965.

�•
•
•
•
~

- 69 is possible that federal grants are available for 75 percent
of the cost of th ~ building which would negate the need for
any tax levy.
Financing of the city's share is shown as general obligation bonds in Table 14. If a federal grant is not forthcoming, the city would be required to raise the monies in
this manner.
In view of the fact that the present debt limit
of the city is relatively restricted, it would be possible
for Otsego County to assume the full faith and credit of all
the $950,000 needed for the city-county building.
Thus, the
city would only pay rent to the City-County Building Authority
and would not encumber its bonding power. The county has a
bonding limit of $2,900,000 and the proposed capital improvement program for the county only uses a relatively small part
of this bonding power •
Continued Street Improvements
The city has maintained a relatively sound street system
over the years.
In recent years, approximately $12,000 of
the motor vehicle funds have been used for annual street maintenance.
It is proposed that this be continued during the
six-year program; thus, a total of $72,000 would be used for
this purpose in the program. The remaining $16,000 of the
existing motor vehicle funds would be used as previously discussed; i.e., $12,000 to retire storm sewer certificates of
indebtedness and $4,000 for a reserve sinking fund.
Cost of the Program
The proposed six-year capital improvement program would
obviously require increased taxes and service charges to the
citizens of Gaylord. The $386,000 in general obligation bonds
(not including the municipal offices) will require a three
mill increase for the already approved water system bond issue,
and an additional one mill for the $100,000 in sanitary sewer
bonds. Thus, the present tax rate would increase from 12.50
mills to 16.50 mills. Also, the present minimum sanitary
sewer charge would increase from $1.50 to $3,00 quarterly. The
proposed increase of 4.0 mills would produce approximately
$26,000, which is about $10.00 per capita per year. The increased sanitary sewer charges would amount to approximately
$2.00 per capita. The proposed capital improvement program
would provide the community with much needed public improvements at a relatively minor cost to the citizens. The undertaking of these essential improvements will be dependent upon
the willingness of the citizens to further improve their community.

�ill
ill

1)11

11111

ill
ill

"ill

- 71 -

PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION
The Comprehensive Plan for Gaylord is a guide for future
physical development of the city affecting both public and
private entities, and is intended to create a well designed,
efficient, and desirable community. The preparation of the
plan is the responsibility of the City Planning Commission
with the support of the citizens of the city and the adoption
and enforcement of the plan by the City Council and city
officials.
The Planning Commission, however, as the sponsor
of the plan and advisor to the city authorities should continue to review all matters affecting physical development of
the city and should remain active in promoting the plan in
the community.
The plan itself is merely a blueprint for an orderly and
attractive community which Gaylord should strive to be in the
future.
The task remains of actually bringing into being
this planning program. This can be accomplished through careful guidance and direction of the many day-to-day activities
affecting the physical city and to gradually carry out the
various improvements proposed in the plan. The plan is of
little or no value unless it is followed and its recommendations are carried out in the ensuing years.
The preparation of a comprehensive plan will not, in itself, insure a successful planning program in Gaylord.
Many
plans have been prepared in other cities, set aside, and the
development in these communities continued without direction.
Experience has indicated that there are five basic measures
that are required to ·develop a city in accordance with a plan.
These are briefly reviewed:
Independent Planning Agency.
There must be an independent planning agency.
The task of securing the planned development of a city is too great to be entrusted to an agency or
department whose responsibilities are chiefly in another field.
The planning agency should be independent of other municipal
agencies and should be given legal powers sufficient to permit
it to advise, and have its advice heeded, by other local public
bodies including independent agencies and State and Federal
commissions or boards who are engaged in building activities
in the community.
While in one sense it is necessary for the
planning agency to be objective and independent, its activities must be integrated with the municipal governmental structure to insure the proper coordination of the day-by-day activities of the official policy making and constructing departments and officials.

�-

72 -

Officially Adopted Comprehensive Plan. There must be an
officially adopted comprehensive plan. The building of a city
is a gradual process of growth carried on by numerous individuals and agencies and it is imperative that there be a guide
for the coordination of the process, expressed in terms of a
comprehensive city plan.
This plan must have official recognition through adoption by the City Planning Commission. Th i s
official adoption will then insure the attention to the plan
by city departments and other jurisdictions. As a practical
matter any city plan to be successful must be worked out,
maintained, and constantly revised in consultation with all
public agencies that are involved and affected. To be successful, it must not just have the acceptance, but the enthusiastic approval, of the various public agencies and officials.
Private Development Coordinated.
To insure that private
property development is properly coordinated with the comprehensive plan, legal measures are required.
Controlling the
basic land use pattern, the zoning ordinance is one of the
most important parts of a city plan. Through subdivision
regulations, new residential areas can be designed within the
framework of the comprehensive plan. Areas for new thoroughfares and for parks and schools may be reserved in the proper
place.
Public Improvements Coordinated. Public improvements
must be coordinated with the plan. The comprehensive plan
should be a major consideration in the design of all public
improvements. To insure proper consideration of such improvements, the Planning Commission should be charged with the responsibility of reviewing plans for all public improvements
prior to authorization or construction.
If the improvement
is in accordance with the plan, it is approved.
If it conflicts with the plan, it is disapproved or an appropriate modification is suggested.
Public Support.
There must be public understanding and
support of the plan. No matter how excellent the planning
laws, no matter how sound and inspiring the city plan, no
matter how sympathetic and cooperative the officials may be,
the comprehensive plan will not be carried out unless the
plan is generally understood and approved by, and has the
backing of the people of the community.
Coordination of Public Improvements
For many years, the State of Michigan has had legislation
providing for the creation of a city planning commission, outlining the power and authority of such commissions, and providing for the preparation and adoption of comprehensive city plans.

�II
II
II
II

II
II
II

II

I

I

'.

- 73 -

This act authorizes the appointment of a city planning commission, establi~hes the term of office for such members,
provides for the organization of the commission, the making
of reports, the employment of consultants, et cetera.
The Planning Commission bas wide powers in reviewing
and making recommendations concerning all public improvements.
The Council having jurisdiction over projects can, of course,
override an adverse recommendation of the Commission; but,
the requirement that the plans for the improvement be reviewed
before it is built affords an opportunity for coordination
with the city plan and allows the Planning Commission to bring
to the attention of the appropriate public officials any lack
of conformity with the plan.
It also affords time for public
opinion to be heard, provides a means of keeping the public
and the council informed concerning the plan, _and insures that
the city plan will be considered in the location and design
of all such improvements.

-II

Michigan State law requires that the compr~hensive plan,
or any part thereof, · shall be adopted by resolution of the
Commission.
After its adoption by the Commission, an attested
copy of the plan must be certified to the council, and the
County Registrar of Deeds, and after · which action~ the plan
constitutes the official city plan. Amendment of the comprehensive plan can be made, but only after referral to the City
Planning Commission for its recommendations.

II

A greater part of Gaylord is composed of private buildings. The various public improvements such as streets, utilities, schools, et cetera, are service facilities which enable
the private developments to function.
Consequently, if the
basic pattern of the community is to conform with the plan,
several regulatory measures are needed to help guide private
building construction.

Ill

II
II
II

·•,

;

Guidance of Private Development

Recommendations on certain regulatory measures were presented in previous preliminary reports.
These include the
zoning ordinance, the subdivision regulations, and a major
street plan. These regulations either direct private growth
or control the standards of private development.
Mere adoption of these laws is not enough as they should be carefully
administered and strictly enforced.
One of the major activities of the City Planning Commission will be the administration of the zoning and subdivision
regulations. From time to time, there will be petitions and

�"
"II
II
II
II
II

- 74 requests for changes in the zoning ordinance. Each of these
should be studied on the basis of the conditions and, especially, from the standpoint of the desirable development of
the community as a whole. The ordinance should never be made
subject to easy and frivolous amendments.
Nonetheless, there
will be instances when revision is desirable. These changes
should be made only after the most careful appraisal of the
conditions and the weighing of public· interests and welfare,
to insure that the change is warranted.
Similar careful consideration should be given to each subdivision design. Once
the plat is recorded and streets and lots laid out, the pattern is fixed, and the design of the area should be made as
nearly perfect as possible in its very conception.
Public Understanding and Support

-II

It is essential that the citizens of Gaylord· understand
the many problems confronting the city as revealed by the
comprehensive plan; how the plan can assist in solving these
problems; and the many advantages that the citizens as · a whole
may derive therefrom. · No matter how effective the legal procedures that are made available for carrying out the plan, the
administration cannot· be completely successful unless the plan
is understood by, and has the support of, · the public.
Lack
of understanding of comprehensive plans · by the citizens has
invariably been one of the weakest phases of planning programs.

II

1. An active citizen committee that remains as a permanent organization is of great value in a planning program.
Through this permanent committee, the will of the community
will thus be represented and expressed to advise upon the various elements of the plan. "The intelligent understanding and
wide representation of such an organization can consolidate
public opinion in favor of developing the city in a truly democratic manner along the principles set forth in the city plan.

"-II
II
II

The following are suggested measures for obtaining citizen
understanding and support of the planning program in Gaylord:

2. Publication and distribution of the plan provides an
important means of acquainting the public with its aims and
proposals. The area newspapers and radio stations have done
an excellent job of publicizing the studies and proposals.
3.
Another important means of gaining public understanding and support is the inclusion of studies of the plan in the
elementary and high school curricula.
Copies of the reports,
including the final report, should be placed in all school and
public libraries. ·

�111

111

"Ill

Ill
Ill
Ill

-Ill
"
II
II
"-II

- 75 4.
Annual reports published by the City Planning Commission could be efnective tools in informing the public of
progress on the plan.
5.
The Planning Commission could form an ex-officio publicity committee consisting of approximately three members,
one member of the Commission, a member of the city staff, and
a member of an active community organization such as the
Chamber of Commerce. This committee could prepare map displays for retail stores and banks, arrange for newspaper and
radio publicity, develop color slides and models of the longrange program.
Planning Commission Program
In order for the planning program in Gaylord to be effective and actually serve as a guide for future development,
certain major steps must be initiated by the City Planning Commission in the near future.
These important steps are essential and immediate objectives.
It is the responsibility of
the City Planning Commission to initiate these programs _reviewed in the following:
1. Adoption of the Comprehensive Plan.
The ' first and
the most important step is the adoption of .the comprehensive
plan.
~e_veral phases have already b,een adopt~d by the Commission.
All of the other actions and programs of the city
to guiqe the future development are based upon this comprehensive plan.
The City Planning Commission should pursue the
adoption of the plan.
2. Recommendations on a Capital Improvement Program. The
comprehensive plan outlined an extensive number of public improvements that should be developed in Gaylord during the next
twenty years.
The development of these public improvements
should start immediately so that they are developed gradually
over a period of years. Therefore, it is imperative that the
city undertake a sound program for capital improvements. The
Planning Commission should refine the capital improvement program and forward it to the City Council recommending its execution.
3.
Publish a Summary Report. Publication and distribution of the comprehensive plan is the first important means of
familiarizing the public with the Commission's activities.
The mere printing of the plan in its entirety will not, however, be adequate means of securing public understanding. Many
people will not read such a report and many will not remember
the large amount of data and recommendations contained therein.

�- 76 It is essential that an educational program of a more visual
nature be presented. A summary brochure of the plan, presented
in this manner, should be prepared for a wide-scale distribution.
4. Planning Publicity Programs.
The Planning Commission
should inaugurate a publicity program. Educational activities
must be continued in succeeding years, for a single program,
even though extensive, is quickly forgotten.
The Planning
Commission should publish annual reports as well as any special
studies of city-wide interest which it may undertake.
These
reports should clearly present accomplishments that have been
made under the comprehensive plan and through capital improvement programs.
City Council Program
The City Council, as the legislative body of the municipal government, has the final responsibility for all planning
in the community.
It is therefore essential that the Council
pursue a program in order to make effective use of the comprehensive plan for Gaylord.
A program, pertaining to planning,
is outlined in the following:
1. Acceptance of the Plan. Following refinement and
adoption of the comprehensive plan by the City Planning Commission, the Commission would forward the plan to the City
Council. This plan will represent the combined thinking of
the Planning Commission members, the consultants, and interested citizens.
It is the responsibility of the City Council
to accept the plan as a public document to serve the present
and future City Councils.
2.
Initiate Improvements.
The capital improvement program, based upon the comprehensive plan, should be forwarded
to the City Council by the Planning Commission. The City Council should carefully review the proposed program, revise and
modify it according to their judgment of local needs, and initiate legislation for its execution. Gaylord bas many pressing
needs for public improvement and a delay in providing these improvements will only create a greater burden for the community
in the future.
3. Adoption of Regulatory Measures.
Following action by
the Planning Commission, the City Council should proceed with
the adoption of the revisions in the zoning ordinance and the
subdivision regulations. These municipal ordinances are necessary for the City Council to properly control and guide future
private development.

�"
":
"-II
-II
II
II

-II
II
II
II
II

- 77 Planning Commission Policies and Procedures
Any major public physical improvement should be referred
to the Commission for study and report before it is initiated
and land purchased therefor. A cooperative action between the
City Planning Commission and the City Council will be required
to make it effective. The Commission must be kept informed
regarding changing conditions or unexpected trends which may
require some adjustments in the long-range plan and in the
capital improvement program.
Such adjustments should not result in abandoning the basic principles or the major proposals
of the plan, but will consist largely of minor modifications
to meet changing conditions. The Planning Commission should
act as an advisory body to the City Council for any public project that would affect the general deve_lopment of the community.
The Planning Commission should interpret the comprehensive plan
for the City Council.
One of the important functions of the Planning Commission
should be an annual review of the capital improvement program
in cooperation with the affected officials and agencies.
The
Planning Commission is concerned with all improvements affecting the community and it is the logical agency to suggest their
coordination and scheduling. The City Council should direct
the Planning Commission to prepare annually a program of capital improvements for their consideration.
The new zoning ordinance provides that the Planning Commission shall study any change requested in the zoning ordinance or district map and make a report before official action
is taken by the City Council.
The Planning Commission is the
logical agency to consider such changes, as it has thoroughly
studied all of the major phases of urban development and is
conversant with the data and principles on which the zoning
ordinance is based. There are several phases of zoning administration upon which the City Council and the City Planning
Commission are required to take action.
The proposed land subdivision ordinance places heavy responsibility on the Planning Commission.
Each subdivision plat
is submitted to the City Planning Commission for careful examination to determine whether it conforms to the general provisions of the comprehensive plan and to the standards established
by the regulations.
The responsibility of the Planning Commission is to determine general overall policy and to make decisions on matters
referred to it concerning the physical development of the city.
The Commission should have a carefully worked out set of rules

�- 78 -

and bylaws and an established procedure.
The latter should
include, among other things, the establishment of regular
monthly meeting dates and deadlines for the submission of
matters to be considered at regular meetings. Close cooperation between the city and the county should be encouraged
by the City Planning Commission.
Joint meetings between the
city and the county should create an excellent liaison.
The Planning Commission should not only be aware of local
trends, but should stay informed of new trends and major developments in other cities. Attendance at state and national
conferences or meetings on planning and urban development is
helpful in keeping the Commission and the community informed
of progress and experience in handling local problems in other
urban areas.
The Planning Commission should also be a service
organization for supplying data and information on local conditions and for helpful assistance to both private and public
agencies in dealing with current problems.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008297">
                <text>Gaylord_Comprehensive-Plan_1966</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008298">
                <text>Harland Bartholomew and Associates</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008299">
                <text>1966-05</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008300">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008301">
                <text>The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Gaylord was prepared by Hardland Bartholomew and Associates in May 1966.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008302">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008303">
                <text>Gaylord (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008304">
                <text>Otsego County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008305">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008307">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008308">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008309">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008310">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038325">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54699" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58970">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/6ef58851bc4749d022b94cd56f1ce7a0.pdf</src>
        <authentication>28f1dc9cf741e8220f9b5a681b0b93e1</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008296">
                    <text>COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CITY OF FREMONT

FEBRUARY 1981

PREIN &amp; NEWHOF

ENGINEERS • PLANNERS

�COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
CITY OF FREMONT, MICHIGAN

r

�f

r
r

f

r

I
I

FORWARD
This publication constitutes the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City of
Fremont, Michigan.

The Plan consists of a series of background studies with respect

to environmental considerations and their development limitations, population, economic,
comnunity facilities, transportation, utilities and land use.

. planning series also involved forecasts of population growth to the year 2000 and
what this means in terms of new housing units production and other land requirements.

Additional studies in this planning process include the formulation of comprehensive
goals and objectives, future land use, major throughfare and central business district

'~
I

I~
I

plans.

,.

I

f

r
r
r

b

Each study report was reviewed and discussed by the Planning Commission involving citizen

input prior to moving on to the next step in the work program.

proposed as policy and not a binding legal document.

The Plan herein is

However, it is intended to serve

the City as a growth management tool and a sound basis for the City's zoning ordinance

,~

I

Part of the background

and map.

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

REGIONAL AND AREAWIDE RELATIONSHIPS

1 - 2

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

3 - 33

•

Environmental Considerations
Topography
Soil Characteristics
Aquatic Systems
Prime Woodlands

3 - 6
3
3 - 4
4 - 5
5

•

Population Analysis
Total Size
Age Dis tri butfon
Education
Income
Employment

7 - 13
7 - 8

•

•

•
•
■-

■-

•

9 - 10
10
11 - T2
12 - 14

Economic Characteristics
Manufacturing
Retail Trade

14 - 16
15

15 - 16

Community Facilities
Fremont Lake Park
Darling Creek
Branstrom Park
Cherry Hill Playground
Fremont City Park
Aboretum Park
Newaygo County Fairground
Fremont Junior High School
Cedar Street Elementary School
Ptne Creek Athletic Field
Fremont High School
Daisy Brook Elementary School
Fremont Christian Elementary School
Fremont Christian Junior High School
Privately Owned Facilities

22 - 29

•

Transportation Elements
Miscellaneous Transportation Facilities
Roads

26 - 27
26
27

•

Uti 1i ty Services
Water Distribution System
Sanitary Sewer System

27 - 29
27
27

•

Existing Land Use Profile
Residential
Commercial, Offices and Industrial
Public and Private Recreation

30
30
31

i

16
16
17
18
19
19
19
19
20
20

21

-

25
17
18
19

- 20

- 21

21
21
22
22

30 - 33

�TABLE OF CONTENTS cont.

Schools
Agricultural
Open Space
Other Land Uses

,.

31
31
31
31 - 33

PROJECTED GROWTH TRENDS

34 - 40

•

Population Growth Trends
Alternative No. 1
Alternative No. 2

34 - 35
34
34 - 35

•
•

Housing Growth Trends

35 - 39

Nonresidential Gorwth Trends
Commerical Uses
Industrial Uses

39 - 40
39 - 40
40

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

41 - 42

•

Residential Areas

41

•

Commercial Areas

41 - 42

•
•

Industrial Uses

42

Open Space and Recreation

42

LAND USE PLAN

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

43 - 49

Low Density Residential

44

Medium Density Residential

44

High Density Residential

44 - 45

Commercial Uses

45 - 46

Professional Offices

46

Industrial Uses

46 - 47

Public and Semi-Public

47

Recreational

47 - 48

•

Agricultural

48

•

Future Utility Service Areas

48 - 49

ii

�TABLE OF CONTENTS cont.
Page
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT STUDY

50 - 63

•

Physical Resources
Existing Land Use
Physical Appearance

50 - 52
50 - 52
52

•

Retail Trade

52 - 56

•

Parking

56 - 59

•

Vehicular Circulation

59

•

Development Plan
Land Use

60 - 63
60 - 62

MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN

64 - 72

•

Existing Thoroughfare System

64 - 65

•

Future Traffic Volumes and Capacities

65 - 68

•

Major Thoroughfare Plan
Primary Roads
Secondary Roads
Collector System

69
69
70
71

LIST OF TABLES
Table 1

Population Growth Trends for the City of Fremont and
Other Geographic Areas

8

Age Distribution of the Population, City of Fremont,
1960 and 1970

10

Table 3

Educational Attainment for the City of Fremont, 1960 and 1970

10

Table 4

Income Distirbution for the City of Fremont for 1960 and 1970

11

Table 2

Table 5
Table 6
Table 7

Employment by Major Industry Group, City of Fremont, Michigan,

1960, 1970

Employment by Occupation, City of Fremont, Michigan,

1960. and 1970

Table 9

14

Manufacturing Establishments in Fremont, Michigan 1967, 1972,
1979

Table 8

13

15

Retail Trade Summary, City of Fremont, Michigan, 1954, 1963,

1967, 1972

16

Existing Land Use, City of Fremont, Michigan

32

iii

-

72
70
71
72

�l

LIST OF TABLES cont.

Table 10 Population Projections for the City of Fremont, Michigan
1980 - 2000
Table 11

Housing Characteristics of the City of Fremont, Michigan
1979

35
35

Table 12 Projected number of Housing Units for the City of Fremont,
Michigan 1979-2000

36

Table 13 Projected Housing Mix and Units for the City of Fremont,
Michigan; Year 2000

37

Table 14 Number and Type of Housing Units Projected for 1979-2000,
City of Fremont, Michigan

38

Table 15 Number of New Housing Units, Density and Acreage Requirements
for the Year 2000, City of Fremont, Michigan

38

Table 16 Projected Land Needs for Residential Purposes by Types, City of
Fremont, Michigan

39

Table 17
Table 18

Population and Cormnercial Acreage Projections for Fremont,
Michigan and Surrounding Townships, 1980-2000

40

Industrial Acreage for the City of Fremont, Michigan 1980-2000

40

Table 19 Existing Land Use and Land Needs by the Year 2000, City of
Fremont
Table 20
Table 21
Table 22
Table 23

43

Projected Total Retail Sale for the Fremont Trade Area, Newaygo
County, Michigan

53

Population Projections for the Fremont Trade Zones, Newaygo
County, Michigan

54

Projected Total Effective Buying Income for the Fremont Trade
Zones, Newaygo County, Michigan

54

Projected Total Sales, Effective Buying Income and Sales not
Captured for the Fremont Trade Areas, Newaygo County, Michigan

55

Table 24

Existing Retail Floor Area and Projected to the Year 2000 for the
Fremont Trade Area, Newaygo County, Michigan.
56

Table 25

CBD Parking Supply and Demand, City of Fremont, Michigan, 1980

Table 26

Existing and Projected Traffic Volumes, Fremont Central Business
District 1980-2000
68

Table 27

Projected Traffic Volumes and Road Capacities for Selected Streets,
Fremont, Michigan
68

iv

59

�II]

C
•

III

•
•
•
•
•
•

LIST OF FIGURES
Page
Figure 1 Vicinity Map

2

Figure 2 Soil Suitability

6

Figure 3 Percent Changes in Population, Fremont Area

7

Figure 4 Recreational Facilities

24

Figure 5 Premont School District

25

Figure 6 Water Mains

28

Figure 7 Sanitary Sewers

29

Figure 8 Existing Land Use

33

Figure 9 Future Utility Service Areas

49.a

Figure 10 CBD Existing Land Use

51

Figure 11 CBD Parking Inventory

57

Figure 12 CBD Parking Supply and Demand

58

Figure 13 CBD Future Land Use

62

Figure 14 Illustrative Site Plan - CBD

63

Figure 15 Road Classifications

66

Figure 16 Traffic Volumes

67

Figure 17 Comprehensive Plan

72 ·

~
~
V

�•
•

REGIONAL AND AREAWIDE RELATIONSHIPS

•

�•
•
•
•
.,
•
•
-••
•
•
•
•
•■
•
•
•-~

' REGIONAL AND AREAWIDE RELATIONSHIPS

Toe City of Fremont is located within the southwestern portion of Newaygo County,
on the north side of Fremont Lake.

This urban community of 4,115 persons is sit-

uated in an agri'cultural and water resort area 50 miles north of Grand Rapids

Metropolitan Area and 30 miles northeast of Muskegon.

With the Manistee National

Forest occupying approximately two-thirds of Newaygo County, Fremont naturally acts

as the center of population for the county.

Contributing to the population attractions

are the hundreds of lakes in the County and the two .principle rivers, the Muskegon and
the White .

The aesthetic and recreational value of these lakes and streams is priceless, not

only for leisure time activities of City natives but for the growth and development
of the community.

Commercial developments rely on the seasonably heavy tourist trade

brought on by the attractions the City has to offer.

This in turn helps boost the

economic base .

Fremont is served by one secondary State High\-1ay, M-82, which is located on South

Stewart Avenue and on Main Street.

This easily accessible community makes Fremont

a favorable location for Gerber Products, the largest producer of baby food in the

world, who's home office and research center are located within the City . . In addition,
two chemical oriented industries, Carojon Chemical Company and Ori-Slide Incorporated

are located here.

With these industries, Fremont has a firm employment base.

Coupled with a sound economic and employment base, Fremont's location is very favor-

able.

Figure 1 portrays Fremont's location in relationship to the region .

-1-

�11
11

•

I

I

- ••• - L - - - - • ~ - - - - - '- - - -- •

I

NI

~

i~

I

~

- -

I

ILL!;._ 1,')-__ .,;_ __ ••

-, ------,------

- - - - T - - - -

~

I

I

- -- - -

I

I

•
•

FIGURE

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CITY OF FREMONT
NEWAYGO COUNTY, MICHIGAN

VICINITY

MAP

---- MILES

0

10

20

30

~

�•
•
•

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•-~

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

Environmental Considerations

The natural and physical features of the Fremont Area must be accounted for and made

an integral part of the Comprehensive Development Plan for the City of Fremont.

By

taking into account environmental considerations, decisions can be made as to what

extent environmental values outweigh urban development values.

This is necessary

to enhance preservation concerns and justify a growth management strategy .

The following environmental factors are analyzed to provide clues to more desirable
spatial urban development patterns consistent with the most cost-effective development
solutions .

Topography - The City of Fremont is situated on the south edge of a glacial dumping
ground.

There is a definite, yet gradual, change in topography from north to south .

In the northern areas, relief is sharp and broken.

Moving southward, the hills be-

come more rolling in nature, generally decreasing in size and flattening out to a

more or less level area around Fremont Lake.

Here can be found the lowest elevation

(746 feet above sea levell within the City limits.

The highest point in the City,

about 900 feet, can be found in the northwest area. ,

In general, the City can be described as two separate mounds.

northwest area and the other along East Main Street.

wide valley northeast of the City.

One is located in the

The latter impounds water in a

Within the valley are numerous isolated hills and

a chain of four connected lakes .

Soil Characteristics - Since Fremont lies on a glacial dumping ground, several types

-3-

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

of soils have been found.

A total of 36 soil types have been classified.

total, the Nester series is the predominant soil series.

Of this

These soils have a very low

permeability and are generally not conducive to septic systems in regions of dense
development.

However, because of the low permeability the soil is generally very

receptive to agricultural uses.

Moisture is held in the soil, while at the same time,

valuable soil nutrients are not easily leached out .

Aquatic Systems - Fremont Lake, the largest of the City lakes, is located near the
southwest corner of the City and is within the Corporate City limits.

It has a

surface area of 1.3 square miles and approximately 6 miles of shoreline.

It serves

as a receptor for drainage for the entire City including the four lakes in the northwest area.

Much of the land in surrounding townships also comprises t his particular

drainage district .

Other City lakes include; First Lake, Second Lake, Third Lake, and Fourth Lake in the
northwest area.

These small lakes are interconnected and outlet to Darling Creek .

Kempf Lake is a very small lake which feeds Second Lake .

Darling Creek flows from First Lake southwest through the City and into Fremont Lake .
Throughout most of its course, it has a natural appearance with the presence of
vegetation and wildlife.

It flows through Branstrom Park in the nort h and is channeled

under M-82 through a culvert.

Its water quality is good, and its aesthetic and

potential recreational value is high .

There are also three named drains within the City:

Maat Drain, Miller Drain, and

McDonald Drain.

Maat Drain flows southward from

All three outlet to Fremont Lake.

sections of Dayton and Sheridan lownships cutting across an area in the southwest
portion of the City.

Miller Drain flows west to Fremont Lake through the southern

-4-

�portion of the City.

McDonald Drain flows west to southwest across the southeast

area and across the northeast corner of Sheridan Township.

Other drains and drain-

age ditches become active during periods of high rainfall and flooding.

=
•
•
•II
II
II

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Prime Woodlands - Because the City is already extensively developed, prime natural
woodlands are extremely rare.
do exist.

However, a few areas considered prime woodland areas

By far, the most extensive prime woodland is the red pine stand in northern

Branstrom Park .

An additional prime woodland area is in and around Maple Grove Cemetery.

Here,

several mature maples and spruces add to the beauty of the southern region.

Other areas considered prime woodlands have recently been logged off.

This type of

activity must be guarded against if Fremont is to maintain its beauty in a natural
setting.

In the development of new subdivisioris and homesites, care should be taken

to retain as much forest cover as possible .
to enhance the aesthetic value of an area.

Trees offer a natural screen and do much
This value is directly related to the

dollar value of property .

In summary, the last glacial period left its imprint upon the City of Fremont with
changing relief, numerous soil types and many impounded waters.

As a result, soils

in the Fremont area are generally not conducive toward septic systems.

Figure 2

indicates those areas with soil less receptive to subsurface disposal of sewage .
Waste removal other than septic systems should be utilized .

-5-

�.l.l.!. 1. ).l. i•1.• I.I. ;. ). 1•••,
t'e,

... ..... ..

"ta

JI-

&gt;;

fl

}U A ·-csf f i l l P ~ ~ - - ¾ _ l ? j

.,
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CITY OF FREMONT
fEWAYGO COUNTY, M l ~

LEGEND
-

AREA WIT-H SOIL
CHARACTERISTICS NOT
RECEPTIVE TO SUBSURFACE OlsPOSAL
OF SEWAGE.

FIGURE

SOIL
~

U}

2

SUITABILITY
o'
~

aoo· ,200·
.,,,... --I
- - FEET

i,1111•. NWMC) I'

UtGUltlUII - "lA.Ulte

�II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II
II

•
•
•
•
•
•

Population Analysis
In order to develop a basic understanding of the growth of Fremont and the needs
of its population, it is important to study the population growth trends and the
changing indicators such as age, education, income, and employment.

Failure to

assess the impact of changing conditions will mean inadequate solutions to existing
and future problems and needs both in terms of supplying services and the provision
for proper land development.

Total Size - While the City of Fremont grew by only 2.4 percent from 1960 to 1970,
the area grew by 564 people - mostly in the tovmships surrounding the City.

Figure 3

shmvs the percent change of population in the surrounding toimships (Sheridan, Dc1yton,

Sherman, and Garfield).

In 1950, the popu1 ati on in Fremont was 3,056.
3,384 or an increase of 10.7 percent.

the growth was only 2.4 percent.

By 1960, grO\vth in the City reached

During the 1960 to 1970 period, as noted earlier,

It would appear that most of the grov,th in the City

and the area is attributable to the growth of Gerber Products.

As new employees

join the Gerber organization, there are additional spin-offs in the form of service
type jobs.
impact.

One hundred new jobs in any corrmunity has considerable positive economic

Table 1 relates the growth of Fremont to other geographical areas:
FIGURE 3

PERCENT CHANGE IN POPULATION
FREMONT .!\REA: 1960-70, 1970-80

• 1960-70: + 11.8%
• 1970-80: + 13.0%

• 1960-70: + 30.0%
• 1970-80: + 17.0%

DAYTO~I
TOlmSHI P

SHERMAN TrnmsHIP

SHERIDAN
TO,JNSHI P

GARFIELD TOWNSHIP

0 1950-70: +
9.8%
• 1970-80: + 13.0%

o 1960-70: - 15.5%
• 1970-80: + 21.0%

-7-

�TABLE 1

II

Area

II

Fremont

II
II
II
II
II
II
II

•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

POPULATION GROWTH TRENDS
FOR THE CI TY OF FREMONT AND
OTHER GEOGRAPHIC AREAS

1950

1960

%

1970

3,056

3,384

11

3,456

855

1,085

27

1,411

30

1,650

17

Sheridan Twp. 1,759

2,256

28

2,477

10

2,800

13

1,523

1,709

12

1,910

12

2,150

13

Garfield Twp. 1,078

1,713

60

1,488

-16

1,800

21

24,160

12

27,992

16

34,200

Sherman Twp.

Dayton Twp .

Newaygo Co.

21,567

%

1980*

2. 4 4,115

Of

n

19

22.2

*Estimates by Prein &amp;Newhof and West Michigan Regional Planning Commission
(.1975)
In 1970, Fremont's population was 3,465 with a toal of 1,259 dwelling units and .
1,193 occupied units for a 5 percent vacancy ratio.
2.9 persons/unit.

Average occupancy then was

According to City officials, vacancies in the City are non-

existent today.

Through October of 1979, new units constructed or under construction totaled 187.
However, 27 units were demolished for a net increase of 160 units.

Calculations pro-

ceed as fol lm-.,s:
1,259

1970 Units

160

New Units {_Net)

1,419
1,419 Units x 2.9/unit

=

4,115 Persons

Some of this population increase is a result of the anne xation of lands previously
in Dayton and Sheridan Townships.

In fact, 103 units were annexed in 1978 for a pop-

ulation of about 299 persons .

-8-

�Population estimates for Fremont by the U.S. Census as presented in the 1979 Michigan Statistical Abstract indicate 4,776 persons in 1976 or a 37.6 percent change
from 1970. Based on current information, this estimate would appear excessive.
Federal census projections are often determined by tax returns with Fremont mailing
addresses.

Therefore, residents in adjacent townships would be considered res-

idents within the corporate limits for estimate purposes.

II
II
II
II
II
II
II

•II

II

•
•
•
•
•

The land use survey conducted in the fall of 1979 counted 1,416 dwelling units.

There-

fore, the 4,100 figure appears to be accurate.

Age Distribution - Trends during the 1960 to 1970 period show quite clearly that the
age of the population is changing in Fremont .
older while less babies are being born.

The age distribution is becoming

For example, the age group 50 to 64 jumped

from 13 to 16 percent of the population from 1960 to 1970, while the under 5 years
of age dropped from 12 percent to 8 percent, a 31 percent decline in just a 10 year
period.

Further, the family unit size substantiates the trend changing from 3.3 persons in
1960 to 2.9 persons in 1970.

Based on projections for the State of Michigan as a whole, the median age in the
State will continue to change from 25.5 years to 35.2 years by the year 2000 .

Table 2 shows age distribution for the City of Fremont for 1960 to 1970:

-9-

�TABLE 2

Ill
Ill

Ill
Ill

II

II
II

II

•
•
•
•
•II

AGE DISTRIBUTION OF THE POPULATION
CITY OF FREMONT, 1960 &amp; 1970

Age Group

1960

%

1970

Under 5 years

409

12

283

8

5-19 Years

955

29

1083

31

20-34 Years

561

17

553

16

35-49 Years

634

18

588

17

50-64 Years

446

13

547

16

65 &amp;Over

379

11

411

12

Source:

%

U.S. Census of Population, 1960, 1970.

Education - Educational attainment by City residents increased during the 1960-1970
period.
1970.

Median school years completed in 1960 were 12.1, increasing to 12.3 in
Assuming the same trend, current figures for median school years completed

is 12.5.

Following is an educational summary for Fremont:
TABLE 3

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT FOR
THE CITY OF FREMONT 1960 &amp; 1970

Categories

1960

1970

3

5

Elementary, 1-4 Years
5-7 Years
8 Years

56
147
400

17
110
351

High School 1-3 Years
4 Years

288
498

284
626

1-3 Years

225
228

235
319

12.1

12.3

No Schoo1 Completed

College

4 Years

Median School Years Completed
Source:

U.S. Census of Population, 1960, 1970

-10-

�•
•
•
•
II
II

-II
•
•
•
•
•II

Income - Significant changes in the income levels of the population in Fremont are
evident in the following Table.

In 1960, lower incomes are prevalent since the

dolla r bought considerably more in 1960 than in 1970 .
TABLE 4

INCOME DISTRIBUTION FOR
THE CITY OF FREMONT FOR
1960 &amp;1970

Income Levels

1960

%

1970

%

Under 1,000

24

3

5

1

1,000 - 1,999

63

7

15

2

2,000 - 2,999

47

6

38

4

3,000 - 3,999

82

9

57

6

4,000 - 4,999

88

10

37

4

5,000 - 5,999

116

14

42

5

6,000 - 6,999

116

14

52

6

7,000 - 7,999

70

8

59

6

8,000 - 8,999

26

3

88

10

9,000

9,999

37

4

92

10

10,000 &amp; Over

184

22

406

46

10,000 - 11,999

(127}

12,000

14,999

(130)

15,000 - 24,999

(109)

25,000 - 49,999

( 36)

50,000 &amp; Over

(

Tota 1 Families
Source:

853

100

4)
891

100

U.S. Census of Population
() Indicates figures are included in the total
number for the $10,000 and over categories .

-11-

�In 1960, only 22 percent of the population earned $10,000 or more in Fremont.
1970, this figure had drastically changed to 46 percent.
caused by inflation.

By

Much of this change was

However, greater educational attainment was evident which

translates to higher incomes.

Using the Consumer Price Index, income distribution

could be estimated for the year 1980 assuming the same percent breakdown for the in-

II
II
Ill
Ill
Ill

Ill
Ill
Ill

II

•
•
•II
•II

come group.

This is not a totally realistic analysis, however, since the character~

istics of the population most likely have changed since 1970.

In 1970, per capita income was $3,141.

This increased to $4,053 by 1975.

Using

the Consumer Price Index and assuming no change in distribution of income, estimated 1980 per capita income is $5,520.

Assuming an average family size of about

t hree persons, family income is approximately $16,560.

Employment - Employment characteristics of Fremont residents have remained relatively
stable in some areas with drastic changes in at least two areas.

Manufacturing continues

to be the major industry group comprising 36 percent of the population.

The per-

cent of the total employment persons (_City residents) rern ined unchanged from 1960
to 1970.

However, in the wholesale and retail trade areas, a substantial decrease i s noted
fro m 25 percent of the employed persons to 17 percent, or a decrease of 32 percent .
In contrast, professional and related services increased 50 percent from 14 percent
of employed persons in 1960 to 21 percent in 1970 .

Thus, it appears that there are less wholesale and retail facilities but larger in
size.

Further, with the population growth in the area primarily outside of the

City, there has been an increasing demand for professional and related services.
The following Table shows employment by industry group for 1960 and 1970 .

-12-

�II

•II
II
II

•II
II

II

II
II
II
II

•
•
•
•
•II

TABLE 5

EMPLOYMENT BY MAJOR INDUSTRY GROUP
CITY OF FREMONT , MI CHI GAN, 1960, 1970

Major Industry Group

1970

1960

%

22

2

30

2

26

2

60
382

5
31

81
406

6
30

79

6

72

5

Who1esale &amp; Retai1 Trade

303

25

230

17

Finance, Insurance Business
&amp;Repair

116

10

94

7

Professional &amp; Related Services

172

14

279

21

Public Administration

33

3

39

3

Other Industries

25

2

124

9

1222

100

1351

100

Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries

%

Mining
Construction
Manufacturing:

Durab1e
Nondurable

Transportation, Communication, &amp;
Other Public Uti1ities

Tota 1 Emp 1oyed
Source:

U.S. Census of Population, 1960, 1970.

Fremont's employment was 1,351 in 1970 or about 14 percent of Newaygo County's employed persons.

Assuming this same ratio for more current employment figures, we have

estimated current average emp1oyment at about 1,680 in 1979 .

In reviewing employment statistics by occupations, we find similar characteristics .
From 1960 to 1970, professional, technical, and kindred workers; craftsman, foremen,
and kindred workers; and service workers a11 increased as a percentage of all those
employed in the City.

Table 6 shows employment by major occupation groups for 1960

and 1970.

-13-

�•
•II
-Ill

TABLE 6

EMPLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION, CITY OF
FREMONT, MICHIGAN 1960, 1970
1960

Occupation

Employed

1970
%

Employed

%

Professional, Technical, &amp; Kindred
Workers

208

17

276

20

Managers &amp;Administrators

177

14

103

8

94

8

92

7

Clerical &amp; Kindred Workers

219

18

210

15

Craftsmen, Foremen &amp; Kindred
Workers

116

9

144

11

Operatives

199

16

231

17

Laborers, Except Farm

57

5

53

4

Farmers &amp; Farm Managers

14

1

8

1

15

1

Service Workers

77

6

176

13

Private Household Workers

20

2

51

4

Ill

Occupation Not Reported

33

3

II
II

Total

1222

100

II
II
Ill
II
II

•
•
•
•II

II

S~les Workers

Farm Laborers &amp; Farm Foremen

Source:

1351

100

U.S. Census, 1960, 1970

Economic Characteristics
By analyzing manufacturing and retail trade characteristics, the economic potential
of the community can be assessed.

Furthermore, the ability of the community to finance

community facility improvements and to make determinations as to land area requirements for job activities can be estimated .

-14-

�J
J
J
J

•J
J
J

•J
J

•••
•
•
•
•
•
•

Following is a brief analysis of some representative economic characteristics for
the City of Fremont.

Manufacturing - According to the 1967 and 1972 Census of Manufacturers, Fremont
manufacturing establishments increased from 8 to 14 between 1967 and 1972.
current estimates indicate 10 manufacturing establishments.
TABLE 7

1972

No. Establishments

8

14

No. Establishments with 20
or More Employed

4

4

Retail Trade

Following is a summary:

MANUFACTURING ESTABLISHMENTS IN
FREMONT, MICHIGAN, 1967, 1972, 1979
1967

Source:

However,

1979
10*

U.S. Census of Manufacturers .
*Fremont Chamber of Commerce.

Fremont has seen a healthy growth in retail trade in the City, in-

creasing the number of retail establishments by 25 percent from 1967 to 1972.
also increased substantially during that same period - over 48 percent.

Sales

Other re-

tail indicators during this period experienced increases - sales per establishment
and employees .

Following is a summary of the retail trade activity in Fremont:

-15-

�•
•
•
'•
•II'

TABLE 8

1954

1963

1967

1972

81

89

89

111

Sales C$1,000)

$ 9,000

$ 12,000

$ 15,500

$ 23,000

Sales/Establishment

$110,000

$142,800

$174,600

$207,400

402

412

388

401

Number Establishments

Employees
Employees/Establishment
Source:

5.0

4.6

4.4

3.6

U.S. Census of Retail Trade, 1954, 1963, 1967, 1972.

If the Consumer Price Index is used on sales/establishment, the 1979 figure amounts

••

to $365,500.

II

Corrmunity Facilities

,•
,
•
•II
•II
-II

RETAIL TRADE SUMMARY
CITY OF FREMONT, MICHIGAN
1954, 1963, 1967, 1972

Community facilities affect the character of a municipality and its attrativeness as
a place to live and work.
channeling development.

In addition, they can influence urban growth patterns by
Long range planning and programning is needed to ensure that

lands best suited for recreation and community use remain in the public sector.

Fremont Lake Park - Fremont Lake Park is located just south of the City proper .
The water quality in Fremont Lake is deemed suitable for swimming.
City owns approximately 27.4 acres on the waterfront.

At present, the

There are plans to acquire

additional land whi~h will boost the size of the park to approximately 30 acres.
The park attracts a good number of out-of-town campers.

Forty-five of the 63 trailer

sites are leased on a ~easonal basis (five to six months).

The remaining 18 sites

are leased for a limited number of days on an open "first come, first serve" basis.
Revenue to the City from this operation alone has averaged $16,000 per year (gross).
There are no accurate figures stating the additional revenue local merchants derive
from the seasonal tourism.

Understandably, there is controversy over this type of

-16-

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•I
•
•
-

activity.

It is so intensively used by campers, Fremont area residents do not feel

motivated to utilize the area .

The boat ramp is located in the southeast portion of the park.

The block and gravel •

ramp is in need of repair or replacement.

Hardwood trees form a high canopy most

suitable for picnicking (its present usel.

There are restroom facilities and a

small general store in this section of the park.
of two baseball fields.

The western portion is the site

The orientation and location of the diamonds have caused

many balls to be lost .

The lake bottom is a mixture of sand, marl, and some rock.
water vary from two to five percent.

A depth of six feet is attained within a

range of 150 to 300 feet from the shoreline.
these points.
water.

Slopes entering the

The lake becomes much deeper beyond

Depths reach 60 feet approximately 500 feet from the edge of the

Maximum lake depths occur 2,000 feet form the shoreline (110 feet in ·depth) .

A high water table predominates throughout the park.
peat, and muck.

Soils are composed of sand,

Soil erosion is evident on the southwest shoreline.

are exposed as much as 24 inches in certain areas.

Roots of trees

Since nothing has been done about

. this condition, it is very probable that the erosion problems will continue.

A

sanitary sewer system currently serves the eastern portion of the par k (for the use
of the trailer park facility).

The sewer lines are located 24 inches below ground

level (this is approximately one foot above the water table}.

Other utilities include

electricity and water .

Darling Creek - Darling Creek flows southward from the lake areas north of Branstrom
Park.

Throughout most of its course, different species of wildlife were observed

which depend on this smooth-flowing stream of water.

-17-

Vegetation is thriving and

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

water quality is good.

Although at present there are no known easements parallel

to this Creek, it should not be difficult to obtain access throughout its course
to the Branstrom Park area.

The creek has been channeled through a culvert for

a short distance involving the M-82 crossing.

Once out of that area, it regains

its character by sweeping through property owned by Gerber Products and onto the
southern portion of Branstrom Park.

Branstrom Park - Branstrom Park is located on the highest land in the Fremont area.
A low key road and nature trail wind from wooded to open areas up hills and down
to lower areas. · There are two very still ponds fed by springs and by Darling
Creek.

The latter acts as a connector to larger lakes and ponds in the immediate

vicinity.

A small area has been developed for picnic activities including a shelter

and a playground for children.

A very well-planned facility for playing baseball

can be found with two tiers of parking positioned in such a way so as to enable
viewers to enjoy the game from their cars if this is there preference .

The Fremont Public School System and the City of Fremont share in the ownership
. of this park.

The school system owns 53.13 acres and the City 36.75 acres.

The

City of Fremont has undertaken an acquisition program which, when completed, will add
approximately 30 acres to the existing 89.88 acres.

Outdoor winter recreation

facilities have been developed including a toboggan slide, a tow, and warming lodge .
The slopes on the eastern portion of the park exhibit great potential for enhancing
winter recreation and sports .

Several soil types can be found in this area.

However, most range from poorly to

very poorly drained containing muck, peat, and clay loam .

The north and east portions of the site have been left as forests.

Mixed hardwoods

can be found throughout the southern half of the property with more dense forest islands

-18-

�on the east side.

The northern half of the site is predominantly evergreen

with mixed hardwood brush as an understory.

Cherry Hill Playground - Cherry Hill Playground is located due north of the Gerber
Products complex.

Some playground equipment has been placed on the northwest por-

tion of this 2.7 acre site.

The park was observed to be nicely maintained, but

there were no other facilities which might invite more intensive use.

The soils are poorly drained with rather poor topsoil.

Bearing capacities are

fair to good, while the topography is flat.

Fremont City Park - Fremont City Park is a 2.3 acre site located on the western
edge of the downtown area .
a chi1drens' playground.
surrounding streets.
used.

The facilities include restrooms, a band shell, and
An annual festival is conducted in this park and its

However, the remainder of the year the site is virtually un-

This site should be developed as a more inviting passive and/or active

recreation area.

Arboretum Park - The Arboretum is a seven acre natural area located in the southeast
quadrant of the City.

It contains labeled plantings and a limited system of trails.

Miller Drain flows through the site enhancing the woodland setting.

Newaygo County Fairground - Although Newaygo County Fairground is actually owned
by the City of Fremont, it is presently being leased to Newaygo County.

It is a

26.8 acre site with 4-H Club Assembly area, food serivce facilities, exhibition
buildings, livestock barns, lighted show ring, and open space for riding, etc.
The fairgrounds are used very seldom throughout the year.

It is the site of horse

sho1oJs, Scout-0-Ramas, lives tock shows, and snowmobi 1e races in addition to the
annual fair.
-19-

�•

I

-I

I

-II

I

-I
-I

I
I
I
I
I
I

Several smaller play areas are scattered throughout the City.

These are geared

toward the smaller child.

Clubview Playground, which is one acre in size, is an open play area in the northeast section of the City.

Fremont Avenue Playground is a fenced childrens' play area approximately 1.6 acres
in size in the northeast area of the City.

The Fremont Public School facilities, in general, provide the more organized type
of recreation activities.

Following is a discussion of these facilities:

Fremont Junio r High School - Fremont Junior High School is a 91.86 acre site providing approximately 40 acres of outside recreation space.

This includes two lighted

tennis courts, one unlighted football field, one lighted baseball field, one unlighted baseball field, and a gym approximately 70 to 96 feet.

Two baskets (for

playing basketball) have been installed in the parking lot for practice.
for this game are nonexistent at this school.
as a roller skating rink.

Courts

At present, the gym has also doubled

However, school officials have concluded that this ac-

tivity should not be allowed to use the gym because of the wear and tear on the
floors.

Approximately one-fourth of the site is undeveloped.

The soil composition is

mostly peat and muck with very scant vegetation.

Cedar Street Elementary School - An analysis of Fremont Junior High School cannot
be complete until Cedar Street Elementary School is discussed.

-20-

This particular

�I
I
I

-I
I
I

•
•
•
•
-

school has a gym facility 35 to 75 feet and a 10 acre playground.

However, this

acreage is included in the 40 acres of play area presently utilized by the Junior
High School.

Pine Creek Athletic Field - Pine Creek Athletic Field is also under the jurisdiction of the Fremont Public School System.

This area is approximatey 14.2 acres in

size containing a lighted football field, one unlighted baseball field, five unlighted tennis courts which have just recently been resurfaced, a quarter-mile
all-weather track, and two football practice areas.

Fremont High School - The Fremont High School complex is located at the eastern edge
of the downtown core area.
severe parking problem.

It is very limited in its ability to expand and has a

However, some of its facilities are not duplicated else-

where in the Fremont area.

As part of these facilities, it has an indoor swimming

pool, a teen center composed of about 3,960 square feet with game and pool tables,
table tennis, snack counter, lounge area, and one acre of playground.

Also, one of

the grassed overflow parking areas doubles as an outdoor ice skating rink in the
winter time.

This, in itself, is a problem due to the decreased parking space in

the winter months.

Land has already been acquired to the west of the school to

build the proposed civic center.

Hopefully, along with that construction, a mall

area will be built together with additional parking facilities.

Daisy Brook Elementary School - The Daisy Brook Elementary School has a playground
area of approximately 10 acres and a gym facility 60 by 77 feet.

Both the school

and the playground facility encompass an area of 14.74 acres .

All of the above-mentioned school facilities offer the public complete access except during certain school hours and game hours.
have top priority.

-21-

During these periods, students

�I

-II
•
•
•
•

Fremont Christian Elementary School - Fremont Christian Elementary School encompasses
approximately 3.61 acres.

Its recreational facilities include a playground area, an

unlighted ball field, a gymnasium, and an outdoor basketball court area with three
baskets.

Fremont Christian Junior High School - Diagonally across from the elementary school
is the Christian Junior High School facility.

With a total area of 5.27 acres, this

institution has facilities including a playgrouhd area, an unlighted ball field,
and a surfaced court with three baskets for playing bas ketball.

The Fremont Christian School policy is to make all of their facilities available
to the community provided there are no conflicts with school activities.

Privately Owned Facilities - There are several private enterprises involved in recreational facilities that deserve to be mentioned as well.

One privately owned

recreational facility in Fremont is the Fremont Fish and Game Club located in the
downtown area.

Facilities include an indoor archery range and pistol range.

Other

privately owned recreational facilities include the Fremont Theater which opens four
nights a week throughout the entire year; Westwood Lanes with 10 bowling alleys open
all year; the Newaygo County Community Services which has an auditorium with food
handling facilities, an assembly hall with small kitchen, and four shuffleboard
courts.

This last facility is open throughout the year and a great number of senior

citizens use it .

There are two 18-hole golf courses; the Northwoods Golf Course and the Briarhill
Golf Course.· In addition, two nine hole courses are located in the area; the Village
Green Golf Course (public) and the Ramshorn Country Club (private).

Other private

facilities include restarts, riding stables, trailer parks, camps, and boat liveries .

-22-

�•
•
•
•
•
•
-II

II
II
II

This analysis clearly points out that Fremont has a wide variety of recreation
facilities.

It is lacking a few types of activities.

lies in the number of organized court-type games.

However, the greater problem

Local officials have observed

that people want to be participating rather than observing.

Therefore, in analyzing

this data, it is important to interpret correctly the recreation needs as well as
goals and planning criteria to develop an organized and feasible master plan .

Other community facilities include the following:
•

18 Churches

•

Chamber of Commerce offices

•

Municipal Offices

Figure 4 shows recreational facilities, while Figure 5 indicates the extent of the
Fremont Schoo1 District.

-23-

�,---------------~-u~r

r . 11

I

1

1s ,

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

=1

,Nh_,

CITY OF FREMONT
EWAYGO COUNTY, MICHIGA

.ll!!fli!?.
la FREMONT LAKE PARK ADON,
lb FREMOli!T LAKE PARK
2

BRANSTROM PARK

4

CHERRY HILL PLAYGROUND

5

FREMONT CITY PARK

6

ARBORETUM PARK

7

NEWAYGO CO. FAIRGROUNDS

8

FREMONT JR, . HIGH ~CHOOL

9

• ·-

ITTI1I

I II

I I II II

'ifiljoffi)N

q I 11

II •

Ill~

DARLING CREEK"

:$

CEDAR ST.ELEM.SCHOOL

10

PINE CR. ATHLETIC FIELD

II

FREMONT HIGH SCHOOL

12

DAISY BROOI&lt; ELEM, SCHOOL

13

PINE ST. ELEM( SCHOOL

14

FREMONT CHRISTIAN

15

FREMONT CHRISTIAN

~

ELEM. SCHOOL
JR. HIGH SCHOOL

Fremon,

16

RAMSHORN COUNTRY CLUB

17

SENIOR CITIZEN RECREATION

IB

CLUBVIEW PLAYGROUND

19

FREMONT AVE. PLAYGROUND

20

NATURAL PARK

21

WESTWOOD LAN[S

22

NEWAGO CO, COMM. SERVICES

U

FREMONT THEATRE

FIGURE 4

Lake

RECREATION FACILITIES
'
rf'••--w~
~

-

1"11111.IN

10

a IH.WHOI'

-

IMQUHIIIS • !"LANNERS

�-

ct.

D11lcA

L.

(

SCHOOL

DISTRICTS

)

FIGURE 5

COMPREHENSIVE

PLAN

CITY OF FRE.M ONT
LEGEND
-••-

FREMONT PUBLIC
SCHOOLS DISTRICT

NEWAYGO COUNTY, MICHIGAN

~-,

MILES

0

I

2

3

�-J
•
•

Transportation Elements
Transportation systems circulate people and goods within urban areas. Ease of
transportation in conjunction with a city's resources and geographical position,
determine to a great extent the growth of the economy and the urban area.

This

in turn will affect the spatial form of a city.

Because The City of Fremont is a small community, one would not expect sophisticated
transportation systems to be serving the public.

However, the transportation

systems which do exist in the City are well maintained and provide excellent service to the citizenry.

Miscellaneous Transportation Facilities - Presently, there is one privately owned
public transportation service which makes up the extent of public access commuter
service.

The Citizens Anonymous Transportation Service (C.A.T.S.) maintains one

vehicle for appointment chauffeur service.

This service is used almost exclusively

by senior citizens.

Railroad facilities have been serving the City's industry for many years.

However,

the Chesapeake &amp; Ohio has abandoned its railroad right-of-way east of Darling Avenue.
Consideration is presently being given to the total elimination of railroad service to the Fremont area.

The Fremont Airport is located approximately two miles southwest of the City just
west of Fremont Lake.

In recent years, this facility has been upgraded to a point

where the major runway is now 5,500 feet in length with a 250 foot overrun.
east-west runway continues at 3,500 feet in length.
type.

The

Both runways are hard surface

The Fremont Municipal Airport is an excellent facility for an airport ser-

vicing a community the size of Fremont.
petes for industrial development .

-26-

It should be a great asset as the City com-

�-II
•
•
-

Roads - The center of the City of Fremont lies at and along the intersection of
two state highways.

State highway M-82 and state truckline M-20 join the City to

other areas in the county and are connectors to other highways which lead to larger
cities such as Grand Rapids and the City of Muskegon.

Along M-82 through the heart

of the City are found the Municipal Building, banks, and the downtown shopping
district.

This is the center of commercial activity in the City.

The City contains a higher than average number of state-designated major streets.
The majority of these streets are in residential areas close to the downtown district.

Most of the City streets are paved with bituminous and have curb and gutter.

The few gravel streets within the City are generally well maintained.

These are

slowly being paved according to importance and when funds become available.

Utility Services
Public utilities form an infrastructure which determines what type of development
can realistically occur and where it can best be accommodated.

Because they strongly

influence both private and public land use patterns, utilities must receive special
attention in the planning process.

Water Distribution System - The City of Fremont has provided water service to
virtually the entire City as shown in Figure 6.

In addition, through special approval

by the City, water was extended beyond the corporate li~its into Garfield and Sherman
Townships to service a county vocational education facility as well as nursing homes
east of Luce Avenue.

Sanitary Sewer System - Sanitary sewers are also provided throughout the entire
City with only some small exceptions as seen in Figure 7.

In addition, those areas

recently annexed to the City do not have sanitary se\ver facilities as of this date.

-27-

�- -- --------•- -

II

.-

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

\

~

'

·

-

-

I,

~I
L

-

',~
. ,W
:',I"
I,

I

i

-

11

-

-=----

Ii

11"

.

":1

i-

r,iewAYGO COUNTY, MICHIGA

,,

r--

'

I
_

I!

-

I

"-'.=':- ==j~--===--3'4

1'![
I

CITY OF FREMONT

ill
i-----

I'

,. /'=i1

11.

·'. ,,_,
·)f

-ri

;;
-

JP

.J

!

~ ---

i

_____.. __

1•-

I

~JL

~I!

- _2.7

-·-

WI 1111 1111 WI 1111 11111

id,

•/I '

fil -

j _,..i

_-

--

i! ~ -

l,

••• &lt;»''I
::-:~.i:ttrnF~7"""~""".J-..,L'

-- ri

1;

!

51

--4~~-,_.;
I;

i

r();

.{Tr

,.

1;i

111

_JJL
--f~·

t/ ,M••-.. - --.-,r-'-j·~---- _c-

~- :r--i

. ~ -~ I!

' '"'

. '";:·:··

,I

-

!:;:

'I

'
-,

1

I

II

I

.
-~-_.r·rJ
ii

.

11

~:· ~ .,
-

i _:

:ii

!~~A
/.' ·~ -tP'.J

Ii

I

8

t '

Ir:t=1J

,,

~-7-J
;-

i1
'I

'1

.

11

I

-;:,~,p

FIGURE

!!!!!

v--r

F,,,,.on I

lak,

____ _,, ,-

--,

J

;

'

WATER ·MAINS

,,
I
/
I .

l
---,_,

o'

~

\J.}
'

" - . _._

•

; 11 : ~
----,

10

-H

12

j

-

}'

6

_

~

P'IIU• 6 11.wMOf'

eoo'

,_.

1,--.J
...J
•• ..a-fur
r ... tNl:l"S

• l'LAII-M

MAY 1971

�-II
- .
-I
'
''I

I
I

~

&gt;

IX IX
w~W

~-3
z UJ

C,

i.:

h -•~·I.

!

I

•

~

•

l

I

\

I

,---.;

'

I

- ·1
'
1·

\

I n

I
I
2

lfi j

r-

L~-~·'l'=.c.
·-·c&lt;i' -,."'&lt; , . • . .

ii&amp;!

-l

i

.;.

9!

l-

~

:,

!

&lt;( (I)

I

-

,

~

e

Ii
I

~J

,.~

..
.

(I)

1- -- !

U)

.:; ..

i

..

I
-- I

L

:,,..-:'_1,
. ~,
/

,

.!

~ --

. {/:I

.,,:I
I

1:

_. ,,,,.-.

�I
I
I
I

I

'I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

I
I
I

As is the case with the water distribution syst em, sanitary sewers wer~ extended
east of the City limits (east of Luce Avenue ) to service the Newaygo County Vocational
Education Facility as well as nursing care f acilities.

Existing Land Use Profile
Existing land use advises planning decision makers on the extent to which their
community is now developed, the range and amoun ts of the various land uses and urban
activities.

This land use analysis uses classification techniques to bring land use

groupings in line with popular zoning relationships.

Residential uses are comprised

of single family, two family, multiple family and mobile homes.

Other categories

include commercial, offices and industrial, public and private recreation, schools,
agricultural and open space.

Additional groupings take into account public and semi-

public, public utilities and parking.

Residential - Housing makes up the majority of the City's land use (23%). Residential
distributi?n appears to be quite varied as si ngle family, two family, and multiple family dwellings are inter-mixed within several City blocks.

These housing units tend to

be found near the center of town with other concentrations around the lake and recreation areas.

However, one large multiple f amily complex does exist apart from

other residential units on the east side of t ow n.
parks on the west side.

There are also two mobile home

Of these residential homes, single family dwellings make up

the majority of housing units, comprising a lmost 72 percent of all residential types.

Commercial, Offices and Industrial - The ce ntral business district lies along Main
Street (M-82).

Here is found the bulk of t he City's commercial establishments and

office buildings.

Most industry is located outside the central business district

along the railroad tracks and near the highway.

Gerber Products Company, the largest

single employer in Fremont, is located nort h of M-82 near the west edge of the central
business district.

-30-

�•
•

II
Ill
II
II
II

111·

II

II
II
II
II

Ill

Public and Private Recreation - Fremont has a comparatively high percentage of lands
allocated for recreational uses.
percent of the City land area.

Public and private recreation areas make up over 15
Most of these areas lie on the fringe between resid-

ential subdivisions and open space.

Schools - The City's schools are centrally located in various elementary school districts.

Most school property is found outside the downtown area and offers children

short walking distances and easy access to parks and playgrounds.

Fremont High School,

on the other hand, is located downtown and has little or no room for expansion.

Agricultural - Although Fremont is a market for many agricultural products, there
are only about 96 acres of fannland within the City limits.

Nearly all of the

former farmlands have been developed into other land uses through the years.

However,

the surrounding townships have been and still are comprised primarily of prime
farmland.

Open Space - Fremont contains over 293 acres of open space and vacant lands.

These

areas, mostly woodlands and field, consist of over 16.5 precent of the total City
area.

The large acreage of open space/vacant lands is a direct result of annexation

on the fringes of the City which_ included new vacant 1ands to the west of the City,
in the vicinity of Luce and East Main Street, plus other lands which, while vacant,
are committed for a future use (such as the mobile home park north of Locust Street).

Other Land Uses - Other land uses found in the City are:
public utilities, and parking.

public, semi-public,

These uses, though important in their service capa-

city, are less significant in terms of their total land area.

Table 9 summarizes the

existing land use in the City of Fremont as a result of the land use survey taken in
the fall of 1979, while Figure 8 graphically depicts these findings.

-31-

�- ••• ,_ ....... . • •
TABLE 9

Land Use Category
Single Family Residential
2-Family Residential

No. of Units

EXISTING LAND USE
FREMONT, MICHIGAN ~
. Acres

% of Total

% of Developed Land

l, 052

407.7

22.9

27.4

97

18.2

1.0

1.2

Multiple Family Residential

150

15. 5 ·

1.0

1.0

Mobile Home Park

168

25.0

1.4

1. 7

Commercial

61. 7

3.5

4.2

Industrial

124. 7

7.0

8.3

Agricultural

96.0

5.4

6.5

Pub 1i c

15.2

1.0

1.0

Semi-Public

67.1

3.8

4.5

Private Recreation

99.8

5.6

6.7

Public Recreation

179. 1

10.0

12. 1

Schools

107. 7

6.0

7.3

Office

9.0

0.5

0.6

Public Utility

9.3

0.5

0. 7.

Parking

3.4

0 .1

0.2

230.0

12. 9

15.5

16.2

0.9

,. 1

292.5

16.5

Street Right-of-Way
Railroad Right-of-Way
Open Space/Vacant
TOTALS
Source:

1,467

1,778.1 Acres

100.0

Land Use Survey Conducted During September, 1979 by Prein &amp;Newhof .
-32-

100%

�l - - - - ' - - - t - - - - - h j .7 - - - - ~ - - - - - ' l - - - - - - - - - - - f - - - - - l f &lt; ' " " ' - - - - · - - - - i - - - - - - l - - - - - - - 1
I

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

!
i

n

CITY OF FREMONT

ST.

38TH

EWAYGO COUNTY, MICHIGA
LEGEND:

··--,---

-

1:;:;1

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

~

TWO-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

'''

MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

~ - - MOBILE HOME PARK
-

COMMERCIAL

1111
Ill

PUBLIC

D

SEMI - PUBLIC

~

. .

. . m .,··

...·. --~&lt;·
t&gt;i

lllllliltlini:

~ ~ ~ - 9),:

...• ..... □~~~
1·• . z.... ..........

•

•

~ □·

~'

!&lt;t.

• • ••

/r==~==:;:c:;. .. . .. . ..
••

1

•I

•:• •

I[i{1~:'Ii[i'tI

• 1

·•••

••

AGRICULTURAL

-

a
.

INDUSTRIAL

PRIVATE RECREATION
PUBLIC RECREATION

f:~•::.:~1 SCHOOLS
tillilllli] OFFICE
-

PUBLIC UTILITIES

-

PARKING

D

OPEN SPACE

•

••••

.

'I

·.I

FIGURE 8

Fremont

EXISTING LAND USE
f-·-····

i

:
•

PREIN &amp; NEWHOF

10

ENGINEERS• PLANNERS

�PROJECTED GROWTH TRENDS

�•
•
•
•
•

PROJECTED GROWTH TRENDS
Population Growth Trends
Looking ahead and preparing in advance for future needs is the very essence of
planning, and the needs that planning must attempt to foresee depend to a very
great extent upon the size of population.
are undertaken.

For this reason, population projections

The task of making population forecasts is very complex requiring

information for many parameters.

Even with the needed information, unpredicted

developments may seriously invalidate the predictions.

In light of this, however,

the City of Fremont 1 s population projections have been made using two accurate
alternatives which have resulted in logical and realistic estimates.

Alternate No. 1 involves using building permits to indicate growth trends.

In 1970,

the Census of the Population reported 1,259 housing units in the City of Fremont.
From 1970 to 1980, 187 new units were constructed.

However, during this time period

27 units were demolished bringing the net increase to 160.

number of housing units in 1980 is calculated at 1,419.

As a result, the total

Assuming a continued trend

of 2.9 persons per unit which is realistic based on leading social indicators, the
1980 Fremont population is 4,115.

Therefore, projecting the trend of 18.7 new

dwelling units a year with 2.9 persons per unit, the estimated population for the
years 2000 is 5,243.

Alternative No. 2 is based upon population growth trends.

This trend was derived

by determining the percent change from 3,456 persons in 1970 to 4,115 persons in
1980; translating to a 19 percent increase .

If we assume this change will continue

over the next 20 years, the population projection for the year 2000 is 5,826.

Based on these alternatives, it is accurate to project Fremont 1 s 2000 population
between 5,200 0 5,800.

1,Jith Alternative No. 1, the building permits clearly reveal

-34-

�•
•
•

'

the growth characteristics of the community.

Further, Alternative No. 2 is a

good indicator because of the wide mix of economic conditions which prevailed
during the period.

Therefore, for planning purposes, the population projection

for the year 2000 is estimated at 5,500 persons.
determined for preceding years.
TABLE 10

As a result, estimates can be

Table 10 presents these findings.
POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR THE
CITY OF FREMONT, MICHIGAN 1980 - 2000

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

4,115

4,461

4,808

5,154

5,500

Source:

Prein &amp; Newhof Estimates

Housing Growth Trends
An analysis of the existing and long-range housing needs are necessary to
estimate space requirements in an attempt to plan for future land use.

In

the City of Fremont, residential land makes up 31.4 percent of developed
land.

The residential land has been broken down into four types: single

family, two family, multiple family and mobile homes.

Within these categories

the number of units, acres, densities and percent of the housing stock have
been tabulated showing existing conditions.
TABLE 11

Table 11 presents these findings.

HOUSING CHARACTERISTICS OF THE
CITY OF FREMO NT , MICHIGAN 1979
•

Housing Tyee

Units

Acres

Dens i t1

Single Family

1052

408

2.6

71. 7

97

18

5.4

6.6

Multiple Family

.150

16

9.4

10.2

Mobile Homes

168

25

6.8

11.5

1467

467

Two Family

TOTALS
Source:

Prein &amp; Newhof Land Use Survey

-35-

% of Stock

100

�•
•
•
•

Based on population projections and 2.9 persons per unit, the estimated number of
housing units has been determined for the City of Fremont.

Table 12 conveys these

findings .
TABLE 12

PROJECTED NUMBER OF HOUSING UNITS
(BASED ON POPULATION PROJECTIONS AND 2.9
PERSONS PER UNIT) FOR THE CITY OF
FREMONT, MICHIGAN 1979 - 2000
Year

Population

1979
1985
1990
1995
2000

4115
4461
4808
5154
5500

Source:

Units
1467
1538
1658
1777
1897

Prein &amp; Newhof Estimates

Having determined the number of needed dwelling units, a percentage breakdown
can be estimated for each housing type.
indicators and trends.

The estimated housing mix is based on

The rent paying ability of households is significantly

changing during these times of spiraling inflation.

With high interest rates,

enormous construction and land cost, and high taxes, people are left with less
disposable income.

In addition, household characteristics are changing.

This

has resulted in a modification of housing needs as well as housing demands.

The City of Fremont over the past 10 years has experiences an average growth of
16 units a year.
21.5 units a year.

The projected growth over the next 20 years is estimated at
This growth rate is reasonable since many of the new units

will be multiple family dwellings.

With the economic conditions and changing

household characteristics, as previously mentioned, more households are being
forced to seek high density, rental units, and especially the young and elderly.
In addition, with several elderly apartment complexes in the planning stage,
multiple family dwellings making up 18 percent of the housing mix is realistic.

�•
•
•

However, if economic conditions continue to worsen, these projections may be
invalidated.

Furthermore, if the City actively pursues greater industrial devel-

opment in an attempt to diversify the industrial base, a significant impact on housing
development could result.

Keeping these variables in perspective, the estimated

housing mix for the year 2000 was compiled.
TABLE 13

Table 13 reveals these findings.

PROJECTED HOUSING MIX AND UNITS FOR
THE CITY OF FREMONT, MICHIGAN: YEAR 2000

Housing T1ee

Housing Mix(%)
1979
2000

Single Family

71. 7

60

1138

6.6

8

152

Multiple Family

10. 2

18

341

Mobile Homes

11.5

14

266

TOTALS

100

100

1897

Two Family

Source:

Units 2000

Prein &amp; Newhof Estimates

Using the projected housing mix for the year 2000, the estimated number of units
for each housing type can be determined.

Table 13 also reveals these findings.

By plotting the 1980 and the year 2000 data and interpolating for the five year
increments, the number of dwelling units for preceding years can be calculated.
These results are found in Table 14.

-37-

�..

TABLE 14

NUMBER AND TYPE OF HOUSING UNITS
PROJECTED FOR 1979 - 2000,
CITY OF FREMONT, MICHIGAN

Housing Type

1979

1985

1990

1995

·2000

Single Family

1052

1070

1090

1115

1138

97

110

120

135

152

Multiple Family

150

175

210

265

341

Mobile Homes

168

190

210

235

266

1467

1545

1630

1750

1897

Two Family

TOTALS
Source:

Prein &amp; Newhof Estimates

Residential acreage can be determined using the projected housing mix figures
together with density standards and their ranges established in Table 15.
TABLE 15

NUMBER OF NEW HOUSING UNITS,
DENSITY AND ACREAGE REQUIREMENTS
FOR THE YEAR 2000, CITY OF FREMONT, MICHIGAN
Units
2000

Density
New units/acre

Additi ona 1
Acreage

Housing Type

1979

Single Family

1052

+86

High
Average
Low

97

+55

High
7
Average
5
. 4
Low

8
11*
14

150

+191

High
Average
Low

8

16
19*
24

High
7
Average . 6
Low
5

14
16*
20

Two Family

Multiple Family

Mobile Homes
TOTALS
Source:

168

+98

1467

+430

4
2.5
1

12
10

22
34*
86

80*

Prein &amp;Newhof Estimates
* Average numbers are summarized in the totals column.

-38-

�•

Based then, on the preceding tables, Table 16 summarizes for the City of Fremont,
the anticipated average land usage of residential types within a 20 year period.
TABLE 16

PROJECTED LAND NEEDS FOR
RESIDENTIAL PURPOSES BY TYPES
CITY OF FREMONT, MICHIGAN

Housing Tyee

1979 Acreage

2000 Acreage

Change

Single Family

408

442

34

Two Family

18

29

11

Multiple Family

16

35

19

Mobile Homes

25

41

16

467

547

80

TOTALS
Source:

Prein &amp;Newhof Estimates

Nonresidential Growth Trends
Commercial Uses - In commercial enterprises, the market reaches a point of saturation in which a certain number of residents can only support a specific amount of
businesses.

Assuming area needs are presently met, as the population grows, so will

the demand for commercial land.

Presently, commercial land in the City of Fremont accounts for 61.7 acres.

Since

Fremont is the area market center, commercial land in surrounding townships should
be included.

Adjacent commercial lands account for approximately 49.2 acres.

brings the total commercial acreage in the Fremont area to 110.9 acres.

This

With an

area population of 12,515, commercial land is calculated at 112.9 persons per acre.
Based on these figures, 148 acres of commercial land are needed to serve the area by
the year 2000 with a population of 16,714.

Therefore, assuming land is available,

Fremont could absorb 37 additional acres of commercial land.

Table 17 conveys the

projected commercial acreage for Fremont and surrounding townships for 1980 - 2000 .

-39-

�TABLE 17

POPULATION AND COMMERCIAL ACREAGE
PROJECTIONS FJR FREMONT, MICHIGAN AND
SURROUNDING - owNSHIPS, 1980 - 2000

Populatio:1

Commercial Acreage

1980

11,214

111

1985

12,589

120

1990

13,96~

130

1995

15,339

139

2000

.16, 71~

148

Source:

Prein &amp; Newnof ~stimates

Industrial Uses - In the City of Fremont, 696 persons are employed in manufacturing.
Current land used for industrial purposes totals 124.7 acres.
employees per acre.

This computes to 5.6

By establishing a ratio of manufacturing employees in Fremont

to those in Newaygo County and applying this ratio to the number of Newaygo County
manufacturing employees, the number of Frenor.: employees can be determined.

As a

result, projections can be made for Industritl Acreage for the City of Fremont,
1980 - 2000.

Table 18 reveals these findings.
TABLE 18

INDUSTRI~L ACREAGE FOR
THE CI~Y QF FREMONT, MICHIGAN
1980 - 2CJO
198•)

Newaygo County Population*

34,200

1985

1990

37,600 41,000

1995

2000

43,800

45,900

Newaygo Manufacturing
Employees

1, 87 S

2,068

2,555

2,409

2,524

Fremont Manufacturing
Employees

696

767

837

894

936

Employees/Acre

5.6

5.6

5.6

5.6

5.6

124.7

137.0

150.0

160

167

Industrial Acres
Source:

Prein &amp; Newhof Estimates
* Michigan Statistical Abstract 1979
-40-

�GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

�GOALS &amp; OBJECTIVES
An understanding of the goals and objectives of the Comprehensive Plan is essential
to perceive specific proposals and concepts proposed by the Plan.

An essential

purpose of the Plan is to broadly define the kind of community envisioned so that
development, regardless of its rate, will always be toward the fulfillment of
recognized goals.

RESIDENTIAL AREAS
1.

2.

3.

Preserve and enhance the supply of decent, safe and structurally sound housing
within the City of Fremont.
•

Periodically review the structural integrity of the housing supply.

•

Develop programs for conservation and rehabilitation of unsound and
unsightly structures.

•

Consider the establishment of a housing code which requires, among other
things, occupancy pennits. An alternative mig ht be the establishment of
an occupancy permit section in the Zoning Ordinance.

•

Through local ordinances, require owners to maintai n their structures
and grounds in order to promote the health, safety and general welfare
of Fremont's residents .

Preserve the residential character in the various neighborhoods.
•

Protect residential areas from non-residential encroachment.

•

Minimize the intrusion of through traffic in neighborhood areas.

Provide for a variety of housing types within the City to allow people options
in housing.
•

Through proper land use planning and zoning, establish areas for a
variety of housing types within the City such as single family,
duplexes, multiple family (condominiums and apartments), and mobile
homes.

COMMERCIAL AREAS
1.

Encourage business in Fremont to develop appealing shopping facilities which
provide a sufficient amount of goods and services to meet the needs of a
growing population in the City and market area.
•

Promote physical clustering of commercial facilities rather than
strip development thereby providing for joint use of parking facilities,
more convenient shopping and pleasant pedestrian spaces.

-41-

�2.

•

Discourage over-~oncentration of similar businesses to prevent
vacancies and market saturation.

•

Blend the commercial areas with surrounding uses to minimize land use/
traffic and environmental conflicts.

•

Provide adequate parking to create an inviting shopping environment
convenient for all to use.

•

Provide for efficient accessibility to shopping complexes to minimize
traffic conflict.

Promote the Central Business District (CBD) as the major commercial center in a
four township area. In addition, enhance the CBD as the place to do business
rather than dependence on other areas such as Muskegon, Grand Rapids, etc.
•

Eliminate traffic congestion through the use of the one-way street system.

•

Convert Main Street back to the pedestrian through greater use of the
right-of-way for pedestrians.

•

Introduce landscaping and a design motif in the CBD.

•

Minimize or eliminate through vehicle movement patterns.

•

Provide for adequate off-street parking to accommodate existing and future
parking deficiencies.

INDUSTRIAL USES
1.

Promote a strong, stable industrial base in Fremont thus providing a greater
number of local jobs.
•

Promote industrial diversification in the City.

•

Obtain land for industrial development.

•

Encourage industry to locate in an industrial park complex.

•

Work closely with existing industry to promote expansion and to maintain
their present operations.

OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
1.

Development of recreation facilities which will provide adequate facilities for
all the residents in Fremont.
•

Select sites to adequately cover the City in terms of active and passive
recreation.

•

Implement previously prepared Master Plans for Fremont Lake Park and Branstrom
Park.

•

Develop plans for utilization of the Darling Creek River Bed as a
viable recreation resource.

-42-

�LAND USE PLAN

�LAND USE PLAN
The formulation of the Land Use Plan has had considerable thought put into it after
evaluating the inventory and background studies.

The inventory and study phases

included mapping and analysis of environmental features, population, economic,
community elements, transportation and utility analysis and forecasts, and defining
related goals.

These studies were important to establish relationships for land

use decisions which will affect the future spatial form of the City's urban development.

The land use planning process is one of determining land area requirements for all of
the urban and related activities which future populations will require in the City
of Fremont.

The plan is based upon the assumption that, at or around the target year

2000, the various urban and related requirements of some 5,$00 persons will be pro-

vided based on the given capabilities of the land.

As a result of this planning

process, the Land Use Plan was conceived and is graphically presented in Figure 17.

Current acreages for selected land uses are shown in Table 19. In addition, additional
acreage required to accommodate 5500 people by the year 2000 is show.n.

TABLE 19

Land Use Category
Low Density Residential
Medium Density Residential
High Density Residential
Commercial
Industrial
TOTALS
Source:

EXISTING LAND USE
AND LAND NEEDS BY THE
YEAR 2000, CITY OF FREMONT
Existing
Land Use
408
43
16
74
125

AC
AC
AC
AC
AC

666 AC

Prein &amp; Newhof

-43-

Proposed
Acreage

Total Acreage
Year 2000

34 AC
27
19

442 AC

47
42

121
167

169 AC

70
35

835 AC

�Low Density Residentia1
Low density residentia1 areas incij1ude densities of 1-4 units per acre of land.
Within the Fremont City 1imits, these densities continue to be located in the
northeastern and southeast portions of the City.

In outlying sections of the urban areas, the Second, Third and Fourth Lakes area
continues to be a prime low density residential area with its large lots, mctny of
are water oriented.

Other outlying areas designated as low density are areas east

and west of M-82 between the corporate limits and 56th Street, areas to the west
of the City north and south of Main Street and along 44th Street generally east of
Stone Road.

Medium Density Residentia1
Medium density residentia1 areas are designated general1y in the older single family
residential districts of the City.

These are generally found within close proximity

to the downtown area, such as, west of Stewart just south of Main Street, and west of
Hillcrest just north of Main Street.

In addition, the area in the vicinity of Connie

Avenue is designated for this use as well as south of Lake Drive.

Medium density residential areas will develop within a range of from five to seven
(5 to 7) dwelling units per acre.

Generally, this residential category will be

characterized by higher density single family, mobile homes duplexes, and possibly
condominiums with lower density characteristics.

High Density Residential
The plan proposes high density residential districts in older areas of the community where many of the homes are considered in a transitional stage, as well as new,
more rural locations on the fringe of the City.

-44-

High density districts in older

�areas of the community are generally found adjacent to the Central Business District,
such as, north of Elm Street just west of Division Avenue, east of Merchant Avenue
between Main and Elm Streets, along Sheridan Street between Mechanic and Gerber
Avenues, and near Stone Road and Main Street bounded by Gerber Products on the east.

Other high density areas are proposed near the fringe of the City Limits to
allow for newer type developments.

These areas include: north of Main Street and

adjacent to Value Land Center; west of the City; on Main Street near Luce Avenue;
east of the City, and southeast of 44th Street along Stone Road.

High density residential suggests development of housing at a density rate of eight
to twelve (8 to 12) dwelling units per acre.

Generally, high density residential

housing will be characterized by apartments and condominiums. However, high density
single fan~ 1ly units could be possible as more innovative approaches to development
are reviewed and implemented by the City.

Efforts should be made to encourage condominium-type development in the City.

Greater

use of high density housing encouragees young couples and singles to stay in the
community if jobs are available.

This type of housing is necessary in Fremont to

to provide another option to families who otherwise might be unable to secure good
housing because of inflation and high interest rates.

Commercial Uses
The plan proposes a more intensively developed commercial core in the downtown area
with boundaries between Mechanic and Merchant Avenue and extending as far north as
Elm Street and half a block south of Sheridan Street.

Some strip commercial has

been allowed along Main Street from Weaver west to Connie Avenue.

However, in an

attempt to minimize strip commercial any farther west of that point, an area of
professional offices has been introduced between Connie Avenue and the Value Land

-45-

�Center.
Other existing corrmercial areas have been designated for continual commercial uses.
These include the areas along Main Street east of Hillcrest Avenue, and along Stewart
Avenue on the southern border of the City Limits.

The proposed commercial designations take into account regional considerations.
In Sheridan Townships ' Land Use Plan, commercial development is proposed at the
intersection of 56th Street and M-82.

Therefore, the Plan attempts to discourage

further expansion north of 56th Street on M-82 since such development would detract
from Fremont's downtown business and the proposed M-82 commercial center.

Professional Offices
The plan allocates professional office space adjacent to the Commercial core to the
west of town along Main Street between Connie Avenue and the Value Land Center, and
to the east on Main Street immediately east of the existing apartment complex.
Generally, professional offices can serve as an effective buffer between commercial
and residential areas.

In addition, professional offices provide economic vitality

to adjacent commercial areas by the retail purchase generated by professional
office personnel.

Industrial Uses
The plan proposes the concentration of industrial uses in two locations, north of
State Street just east of Stone Road, and along Connie Avenue as far west as Green
Avenue adjacent to the railroad right-of-way.

The designated industrial land which

includes Gerber Products, includes those lands presently utilized for industrial
purposes as well as vacant land necessary for anticipated expansion.

The industrial

area to the west adjacent to Green Road includes some existing industrial lands.
However, this area has the potential for industrial diversification, so sorely needed

-46-

�in the area.

Both locations for industry are logical due to their available vacant lands as
well as the close tie in with existing industry.
compatible with adjacent uses.
are feasible.
handling easy.

In addition, the areas are

Utilities are also readily available and extentions

Railroad service is adjacent to each area making shipping and
However, there has been some concern that the railroad serv ·ce

will be withdrawn in the foreseeable future.

Public and Semi-Public
The public and semi-public uses are widely dispersible throughout the City.
concentrations consist of the school lands
and church facilities.

Major

t he cemetery west of Stewart (M-82),

The public category is composed of municpal facilities,

schools, cemeteries, and public utility lands such as a utility substation, wastewater treatment and water treatment operations and Federal and State offices.

Semi-

public uses include primarily churches and other quasi-public uses such as the
Veterans of Foreign Wars, etc.

The Plan has shown these uses basically as they exist with selected areas for
expansion such as the area between Main Street, Sheridan, Merchant and Darling Streets.

Recreational
As a result of the Park &amp; Recreation Plan, lands following the course of Darling
Creek are designated for recreational development.
Lake Drive and those southwest of Branstrom Park.

These areas include lands along
This is an attempt to connect

Branstrom Park to Fremont Lake Park, offering a recreational trail system through
the City.

The Plan also proposes stage development of these facilities to provide

-47-

�an easier process for implementation inter-~ of financial feasibility.

A smaller recreational center east of Woods
proposed.

~-j

south of Main Street is also

This site is recommended since i : is easily accessible for senior citizen

use.

Agricultural
Agricultural land uses are confined to out1;i~~ areas of the City.

These designations

have been established to assure the availa bi~~~Y of space for increasing urbanization
on the fringes.

Future Utility Service Areas
The present utility system as described en c::-: ;.sses the large majority of the City
of Fremont.

In addition, utilities extend c:r.3~de of the City to the east serving

public and quasi-public uses in that area e~s : of Luce Avenue.

Future growth and deve 1opment wi 11 occur mo r :: "'eadi ly in most communities generally
in areas where utilities are provided, but--:, ~~ particularly in the Fremont area
because of the heavy nester soils so preve lc r.: in the area.

New utility service is

now available around Fremont Lake to the no ~:- and west.

The plan would envision new growth in the i-: ~; t rial area west of Locust, to Green
Road in the vicinity of Value Land, in the

c:.,==

of Division and ~•Jalriut (which would

require a lift station), along East Main St r 2::: north and south of this corridor,
east of Hillcrest and north of East Main Str:::::.

As shown in Table 19, additional land needs :r--: ~ected to the year 2000 are as follows:

-48-

�F

,
'

Low Density Residential

34 acres

Medium Density Residential

27 acres

High Density Residential

19 acres

Commercial

47 acres

Industrial

42 acres

TOTAL

169 acres

This. acreage amounts to only a quarter of a square mile or one-quarter of a Section.
Therefore, this land could develop with no real noticable change in the physical
configuration of the City.

-49-

�,_
Il=f , I ...J'

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

I

I

I

1

__ . 11,

7 r· -

I

·r cir

CITY OF FREMONT

l

~f --- .

I

II

I

I ,J~

EWAYGO COUNTY, MICHIGA

"'✓1

SERVICE AR!A

W SY THE YEAR 2000

~

L

~j
FIGURE 9

FUTURE UTILITY
SERVICE AREA

l'r,ncon I

lo1;,

l\

ffl

·~

""IN
10

- - - · ·I

I NIWMO,

.........."·······

�'.

CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT STUDY

�CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT STUDY
The Central Business District (CBD) is the core of the Fremont Urban Area.

It is

generally identified as having the highest land values placed on the parcels within this area.

It is the social, economic, financial, business and governmental

center of most communities.

The ref ore, speci a1 cons i de ration shou 1d be given to

this area to maintain its rightful role in the many activities of the City of
Fremont.

There are many challenges placed before the CBD at the present time.

Certainly

continued pressure. from the growth of outlying co111T1erci a1 activities threatens
the economic viability of the area.

Traffic congestion, urban aesthetics and

off-street parking are all important considerations in seeking ways to maintain,
restore and enhance the core area so that it can compete effectively with outlying
influences.

The purpose of this study, therefore, is to analyze the CBD in detail, to assess the
problems, the prospects and finally to chart a course of improvements which are
essential for its continued economic strength.

Physical Resources
Existing Land Use - The area generally regarded as making up the Fremont Central
Business District (CBD) contains 50 acres of land lying between Elm and Maple Street,
and between Sullivan and Darling Avenue.
City's land uses.

This area contains a cross-section of the .

These uses are shown in Figure 10.

The configuation of the CBD is typical of those located in many smaller cities.
The majority of merchants are located in a highly concentrated core along Main
Street.

Intermingled among the retail stores are various professional, public and

-50-

�-~ ~

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CITY OF FREMONT
EWAYGO COUNTY,

MICHIGA

LEGEND

~

- ·-

r--r---

~ ~ Fl I I I I
H+l+i-1 1+1-1+1 Fl 11 111 ~
······· a· 1·1·1 1rrE ~ 1- 1+a 1·1·1·1·1·1·1

llllllMfflllllll__J
I~~

,.,

,

,

,

,

,

, ,

,

ELM

DAYTON

~ EG___HI 1-111111 1~1~1 1 -~ l+I fl·H L_

=11mw=,imi=~~ii=mm~~11m~ ·.,:,::=:it}'i :_::&lt; . r.' &amp;&amp;ILi
:}):~/'.:='._::;!=;.::;;=:~l:'.'.1: :.
r,z,t

Vi((C/a

l!t•l·sl• ■

'i"(,:.','.y'j/',((,Ulllllllll[[IIIH

~ ~-1·1·1·1·1 mmm
Fii11-=H

·

fil
II
ail
111 11
e·i 11·1·

C
MAIN

..I

W

:
=

•

f

• • I• 1.1:1:1.1 ~~~ ~~ ~~
~1·1·1·1:1·1·1 ~~IHl·l-!-l·l·l·ll!~·l·l·I l·lllh5EB3
S
g
~11111111 ...111 H~Ed I Fl Fl I I ltlllli L_

r---

4

11

11

I

L.:.:J

TWO-FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL

II

RESIDENTIAL

■

COMMERCIAL

■

PROFESSIONAL OFFICES

Ill
filII

MULTIPLE FAMILY

INDUSTRIAL

PUBLIC

m
[I

RECREATION

~

PARKING

FIGURE

z ~ " ' ~•&gt;
•
z

l

r::,

SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL

SEMI-PUBLIC

MAPLE

• 10

rn

L.:J

f

I

10

CBD
EXISTING LAND USE

~

~

100

100

~---

•OO

,m

�semi-public offices.
ing lots.

These establishments are easily accessible to the City park- .

Also within convenient distance is the Fremont City Park.

offers visual relief from the more intensive business activities.

This park

Residential

homes make up the perimeter of the CBD, some of which are in a transitional stage
(i.e. higher density residential uses, or use changes).

Physical Appearance - The general physical appearance of the CBD is critically
important to its vitality.

The location and appearance of buildings and the street

landscape are elements which create an inviting shopping environment. · In addition,
the strucutral condition of buildings is an important facet in assessing overall
conditions.
sound.

In the City of Fremont, the physical condition of buildings is basically

Only one area of substandard structures has been identified within the CBD,

on the south side of Sheridan between Sullivan and Darling Avenue.

The overall image of the existing business area could improve its aesthetic appeal.
The architectural design of buildings lacks continuity since building form and design
do not relate with the different use of materials, colors, and storefront signs.
Landscape planting in areas is almost non-existent as are other important elements
of streetscape such as seating, trash cans and street furniture.

Consideration

should be given to upgrading the CBD so that it might become more pedestrianoriented, offering curb cuts and ramps for wheel chairs and baby strollers.

Design

improvement through renovation could overcome these shortcomings and generate a
more positive shopping environment in the CBD.
for the CBD.

A general design motif was selected

However, coordination on a block by block basis has not been accomplished.

Retail Trade
The Central Business District market area is that area from which downtown retail
establishments can expect to receive 80 to 90 percent of their business . . Because the
Fremont Trade Area covers a large market, two basic levels of shopping districts have

-52-

�been established.

The primary zone consists of the City of Fremont and households

generally within the ori gi na 1 annexation area.

The secondary zone comprises the

surrounding Dayton and Sheridan Townships and portions of Sherman and Garfield
Townships.

Within this market, total retail sales for 1980 have been estimated at

$38.8 million.

Fremont's total retail sales have been calculated based on statistical information
from Newaygo County for the year 1978.

In projecting retail sales, yearly increases

of 1.81 percent are expected based on United States standards and market compostion.
Applying this factor and holding constant the effects of inflation, Table 20 shows
projected retail sales for the Fremont Trade Area.
TABLE 20

PROJECTED TOTAL RETAIL SALES FOR THE
FREMONT TRADE AREA, NEWAYGO COUNTY, MICHIGAN
1980
$38.8

Source:

1985
1990
1995
(Dollars In Millions)

2000

S46.4

$55.5

$42.4

$50.8

Prein &amp; Newhof Estimates

The total effective buying income is calculated based on population projections and
an established per capita effective buying income.
population estimates.

Table 21 presents the forcasted

In projecting the total effective buying income, it is assumed

the per capita EBI is $5606 for the primary zone and $5265 for the secondary zone,
in 1980 dollars holding constant the effects of inflation.

Effective buying income

is determined from "Sales Management" statistical data for 1979 for Newaygo County.
Table 22 conveys these tabulations.

-53-

�POPULATION PROJECTIONS FOR THE FREMONT
TRADE ZONE, NEWAYGO COUNTY, MICHIGAN

TABLE 21

Zone

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

Primary

5,348

5,798

6,249

6,698

7,148

Secondary

5,442

6,315

7,187

8,061

8,934

10,790

12,113

13,436

Total
Source:

14,759 16,082

Prein &amp;Newhof Estimates

TABLE 22

PROJECTED TOTAL EFFECTIVE BUYI NG INCOME FOR
THE FREMONT TRADE ZONES, NEWAYGO COUNTY, MICHIGAN
. 1980

Dollars in Millions*
1985
1990
1995

2000

Primary Zone

30.0

32.5

35.0

37 .6

40.1

Secondary Zone

28.7

33.3

37.8

42.4

47.0

Total Trade Area

58.7

65.8

72.8

80.0

87.1

Source:

Prein &amp; Newhof Estimates
Sales Management Magazine
*Assuming an Effective Buying Income of $5,606 per
person for the primary zone and $5,265 per person
for the secondary zone-holding constant the effects
of infl~tion in 1980 dollars.

In summary, the 1980 total retail sales in the Fremont Market Area were calculated
at $38.8 million. The total effective buying income, or actual potential sales in
the market area were estimated at $58.7 million.

This translates to $19.8 million

dollars worth of sales that Fremont merchants did not capture.

It should also be

noted that approximately 10 to 20 percent of the sales were to tourists who were
not included in the ability to buy.
exists.

Therefore, an even greater growth potential

Table 23 presents the projected retail market conditions.

-54-

�· TABLE 23

PROJECTED TOTAL SALES, EFFECTIVE BUYING INCOME
AND SALES NOT CAPTURED FOR THE FREMONT TRADE
AREA, NEWAYGO COUNTY, MICHIGAN
Total
Retail Sal es

Dollars In Millions
Total
Effective Bu,Zi ng Income

Sales
Not Ca~tured

1980

38.8

58.7

19.9

1985

42.4

65.8

23.4

1990

46 . 4

72.8

26.4

1995

50.8

80.0

29.2

2000

55.5

87 .1

31.6

Source:

Prein &amp; Newhof Estimates
Sales Management Magazine

With estimated projections of potential retail sales, in the CBD, the next step is
capturing those sales.

Therefore, projected expenditure levels are converted into

retail floor area requirements to detennine additional space for development over
the next 20 years.

Currently, 213,900 square feet of retail floor space exist in the City of Fremont's
Central Business District.

With total retail sales estimated at $38,788,881 in 1980,

the annual retail sales per square foot of floor area calculates to $181.

The amount of retail floor space in the Central Business District proposed in
future years can be determined based on projected retail sales and the average
~etail sales per square foot.

Table 24 relates these findings.

-55-

�TABLE 24

EXISTING RETAIL FLOOR AND PROJECTED
TO THE YEAR 2000 FOR THE FREMONT TRADE
AREA, NEWAYGO COUNTY, MICHIGAN
Proposed*
Existing
Additional
Floor Space (sq.ft.) Floor Space (sq.ft.) Floor Space (sq.ft.)

1980

213,900

1985

234,414

20,514

1990

256,409

42,509

1995

280,470

66,570

2000

306,790

92,890

Source:

213,900

Prein &amp; Newhof Estimates

* Assuming retail sales of $181 per square foot of retail
floor area, holding constant inflation in 1980 dollars.
Parking
Convenient parking is a major factor influencing a person's decision where to
shop.

This is of primary importance in capturing the potential retail market.

A parking inventory was undertaken and Figure 11 reveals the findings.

In the City of Fremont, parking is generated by a core area within the CBD.

This

shopping core is made up of a six (61 block area divided into six (6) sectors.
Within this area, parking demand was determined to help assess the retail market
and its vitality.

Parking requirements are largely determined by assessing the

needs of the various land uses in the CBD.

Based on the amount of floor space

allocated to each use within each sector, supply and demand figures were determined.

By comparing the supply and demand, it becomes clear that a parking

deficiency exists within the Fremont CBD core.

To clarify whether the total park-

ing supply offsets the core deficiency, parking in the total CBD was inventoried.
Figure 12 graphically presents these findings, while Table 25 gives a summation.

-56-

�COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CITY OF FREMONT
EWAYGO COUNTY,

MICHIGA

_LEGEND
. . : . . METERED PARKING

~ ~

Fl I I I I ~
~--~~--p--r
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Fl I I I I I L_
I
"" ► ► " ,■r■-■r .. ~■--■1'-■,.....DIE . I I I I i I I ~
~~ [ITilJ~~II 11 1i 11 L_
~ UJ I IIITTTTR ~
I '"'I I I I I I l _llf'lrnlll l[I ll!)·[=■ i~ITIIIJ~ L....IOJTI 111 I ~ ...,1111 J.I 11111111[11
., Ell□ i
ill[[J 1111..l Ea[j' ,~) D]ll. 1111 Ii
~

~

_

(~)

-------',;,V /

/

~--··

. ···~

ELM

novTnw

SIJffl/EY TAKEN: OEC,, 1979

~~~JA~~EDP~~~:GOR
CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT

BOUNDARY

I 11 I

;[IIBi[IIBi □ ~I

l[

OFF • STREET PARKING

(20).

MAPl.£

l[

I ■■■

NON- METERED PARKING

'------'--..................-l,,;r

1~ttHBtDB-am1~ -

~BIIE~LllJ::=jg

-

m

I I_II I I I I I I I I I I I l~R 111111 l~CJEi~
r1 1111111 111 R~Ed I Fl Fl 11 ltillo~L_

l[

OAK

FIGURE

11

PARKING
INVENTORY

~

�COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CITY OF FREMONT
EWAYGO COUNTY,

~~

~

· I

I I Fl Fl I I I I ~
I _II ~lL~~-1I _I_, I I I II II I II II I H II I I I L_

~. Jttmtff(1_::}j_~~bt-~h Iiii 111111 C
1

,ff' &lt;

,z

~~ □!I

l1rur'111p1r l#li~ C
11
~1111 ~I III l£l!l__1~:!r~~--l_l~llrn+a . .
1
r' ffiE 1·-· -1• t!rrfi e-HHH~1M~00
11

~

®

CHERRY

MICHIGA

SECTOR NUMBER

■■■ I

C. 8. D.

__

SECTOR BOUNDARY

20

BOUNDARY

DEMAND
SUPPLY
SUB- SECTOR

76
__

I

1

I

~

- '
~----J
~ITIBiITIB!Dil 111111111111111 l~R 111111 1!CIE3 ~
l:=illli~[I[B~
;11111111 111 H~Ed I Fl Fl 11 lallJj__o L_
MAPLE

~~

OAK

I

11

II

11

I

FIGURE

12

PARKING SUPPLY
&amp; DEMAND

~
Pf\EJN

a

NEWHOF

ENGINEERS · PlANNEftS

�TABLE 25

CBD PARKING SUPPLY AND DEM.~N D
£ITY OF FREMONT, MICHIGAN 1980

CBD Areas
· Core
Adjacent Areas
Total CBD
Source:
Note:

Demand

SU'.]D lt

Difference

1,138

707

- 431

339

381

+

1,477

1,088

42

- 389

Prein &amp; Newhof Estimates
The CBD core is defined as t he highly concentrated
commercial center which ge nerates major business
activity and is that area within the boundaries
of Elm, Sullivan, Maple and St ewart.

Vehicular Circulation
Traffic patterns have been analyzed in terms of existing volumes and capacities.
This data was then used to project volumes and to assess t he capabilities of the
system to handle future traffic loads.

The proposed vehicu l ar circulation plan as

presented in the Thoroughfare Plan section evolved from t his analysis.

Concentrating on the aspects of the Thoroughfare Plan which directly affect
the CBD, the proposal is designed to facilitate greater carrying capacity and
easier flow for vehicules by rerouting through traffic off of Main Street.
be made possible by developing a one-way traffic loop.

This will

: he system will consist of

a three lane, one direction circulation loop with approp r iate cut throughs, widenings
and alignments.· This type of circulation network will discourage any through traffic
other than shoppers.

This approach will eliminate the existing conflict on Main

Street between through vehicles and those who wish to par k and shop.

It will allow

for innovative development on Main Street to replace the co ngested character of the
core.

-59-

�,

Development Plan
The Development Plan which is illustrated in this section reflects the fundamental
decisions formulated as a result of the investigation and analysis.

The plan as presented indicates very definite avenues of potential growth in terms
of the direction and location of future expansion and also recommends certain types
of physical development to assure a valid growth pattern.

However, realiz i ng that

all forecasts made for the next 20 years may not hold true as time and circumstances
change, the plan allows for degrees of flexibility.

Land Use
area.

The Land Use Plan proposes for more corrmercial intense land in the downtown

The area between Mechanic and Merchant Avenues and extending as far north as

Elm Street and half a block south. of Sheridan Street, has been designated solely for
commercial use.

The only strip commercial in the CBD has been isolated along Main

Street from Weaver west to Kreps Avenue.

The plan proposes professional offices adjacent to commercial establishments.
Generally this will provide a buffer between commercial and residential areas and
will also generate more economic vitality to the area.

Professional office uses

are proposed on Maple between Division and Merchant between Main Street and Sheridan,
Sullivan and Mechanic and on the north side of Deyton between Weaver and Mechanic.

The plan shows little change in public and semi-public land uses.

These uses will

continue where municipal facilities, schools, churches and public lands presently
exist.

The only land designated for industrial use in the CB0 is that area north of State
Street and east of Darling Creek.

This land is presently owned by Gerber Products

and will be needed for expansion purposes.
-60-

�I•

High and medium density residential lands make up the remainder of -the CBD.

These

areas are found in close proximity to the commercial core and generally in older
areas of the community where many of the homes are in a transitional stage.

Figure 13 graphically depicts the proposed land use for the City of Fremont's
Central Business District.

In addition to future land use concepts and traffic circulation improvements, the
plan proposed some additional, more precise suggestions for downtown revitalization.
These suggestions are as follows:

•

Establishment of a design motif or theme which will assure the
coordination of all building improvements in the CBD such as
architecture, color, texture, street furniture, landscaping, signs.

•

Initially, development of a pedestrian and parking mall on Main Street
including diagonal parking, wider pedestrian walkways and effective
landscaping. Ultimate development might include a pedestrian mall, void
of all vehicular traffic.

•

Improvement of store backs, providing rear entrance to retail establishments directly from off-street parking areas.

•

Additional promotions to generate more business including special showings
of new products such as cars, boats, fall clothes, etc. on Main Street.

•

Consideration of longer store hours and larger inventories to provide
greater selection of merchandise to reach and service a wider segment of
the potential market.

Figure 14 pictorially represents the site plan for the City of Fremont's Central
Business District.

-61-

�~

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

CITY OF FREMONT
EWAYGO COUNTY,

MICHIGA

~
□

MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
!5·7 UNITS / ACRE

r7

[_JJ

-·

•

[HE

••

'--.L......L~'--

~EDIE~DIBg
II

11

~l1111111111111
~11111111

111
OAK

11

I

11 l~H

a ~w

~

PROFESSIONAL OFFICES

I

Fl

8

SEMl·PUBLIC

INDUSTRIAL

CBD
FUTURE LAND USE

F l I 111111111

111 11 I

PUBLIC

FIGURE 13

MAPLE

~[IJ:Ei[IJE~o

COMMERCIAL

1 1 1 1 1 11 11111111111111111111111111111111

••,.,..... ..,.,.,.,,,.,.

8 · 12 UNITS / ACRE

■

lffl
Iii

11111111111111111111111111111111111 1 1

.•••

HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL

l~CIE

F l 11 l t l l l l i

I

~

L_

If

~

---

D

IOO

, oo

tll'O

...

,

�f

'

�-

MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN

�MAJOR THOROUGHFARE PLAN
Streets and highways make up a very important part of the framework which links
community activities to one another.

Because of their importance to a community

it is imperative that they be part of the Comprehensive Development Plan.

This sec ti on of the Comprehensive Pl an examines vehicle networks in the City of
Fremont in general and the proposed thoroughfare system in particular.

While

transportation is a separate section in this study, it is very much an integral
part of the Land Use Plan and general overall pattern for development.

Existing Thoroughfare System
For purposes of analysis, streets have been classified according to their function.
Primary arterial streets provide high volume movement of vehicles through the community
connecting traffic generations.

Secondary arterial streets are similar to primary

streets except they carry a lower volume of traffic.

Collector streets serve the

internal traffic within an area; such as a neighborhood, and connect with the arterial
sys tern.
•

Principle or Primary Arterial - The highest traffic volume corridors
carrying the major portion of trips entering and leaving an urban area.

•

Minor or Secondary Arterial - Streets and highways interconnecting with
and augmenting th.e urban principle arterial system providing service to
trips of moderate length at a somewhat lower level of travel mobility.
This system places more emphasis on land access. It includes all
arterials not classified as principal or primary.

•

Urban Collector - Streets penetrating the neighborhoods, collecting traffic
from the local streets in the neighborhood and channeling it into the
arterial system. A minor amount of through traffic is carried on a collector
street. It's primary function is to provide land access service and carries
local traffic movements within residential neighborhoods as well as commercial a~d industrial uses.

Urban Local Street Systems: - Streets which are not classified in a higher system,
primarily providing direct access to adjacent land uses as well as access to the
higher road systems.

Volumes are low while through traffic is discouraged.

-64-

�The road classification map indicates the
fare system has evolved.

frame1&gt;✓ 0rk

from which the proposed thorough-

The objective has been to define appropriate related purposes

of highways and streets in providing traffic services that influence urban development,
and to establish the most economic yet beneficial system to meet both present and
future transportation needs.

The followin g list defines the street classification

system:

Concerning the classification of these streets, the following is a breakdown of the
primary, secondary, and collector road system within the City of Fremont:

•

Primar) Roads - M-82 (West Main Street and Stewart south of Main
Street _, East Main Street.

•

Secondary Roads - Luce, 56th Street, Sheridan, Dayton, 44th, Osborne
(Weaver), Stone, Green, Darling, Rarnshorn, Lake Drive, Lakevie~ Drive.

•

Collector Roads - Hillcrest, Division, Connie, Lake Drive (north of Lakeview Drive), Oak Street, Pine (east of Stewart), and Woods; Apache Drive,
Iorquois Drive and State Street.

The remainder of the City Streets are considered minor or local streets.

Figure 15

graphically depicts these classifications. ·

Future Traffic Volumes and Capacities
Estimated 1980 traffic volumes on designated streets are shown in Table 26 while
Figure 16 graphically presents these findings.

These figures are based on actual

counts in 1977-78 and projected to 1980 based on the standard increase of 2.7%, as
used by the Michigan Department of Transportation.

-65-

�•

- ---

. - 1.7

-.

-•-

.....,.

- ---

~

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN

·--;

CITY OF FREMONT

I

\
/

I

~EWAYGO COUNTY, MICHIGA

f

,1

I

·,I •·

'

1111 PRIMARY ARTERIAL
I

,]l !
't· -,
':Lt
..--:::--·~ )---1l
'1,JJ..
~

;,_::'

·,,·,: l:

., .

.?'-.

. L.:-&lt;~
:Ji
~-r:- .:;1_~

=:~~~\~
.,

'ii

•...

~\

,--·

:....._i;

&amp;h
4

~

---~-----,/

VA

I,

':51

j~

,

••

SECONDARY ARTERIAL

3l

I

•••

COLLECTOR

L

I .. ;-;.....
.. . .

'

11

;- -, :.j

i
L__rJ
t

J
6

•••

FIGURE

•✓-

15

ROAD
CLASSIFICATIONS

&amp;

~

':,

Fr t-,,,o,,_,

~

'

Lafe
~v

.

t

, I ·1

r.,1,

~

~ &amp;]

_.,.,,,-

I

-~d·-

- ~ ..UL
/I···.~~--

LEGEND

=c,--,_,

I

iJI
I,

10

~➔

te·

i
ii

'-.;;

~,-

~

~-

,,

w

,,~ l ........."°,

o'~

aoo·

1200·

..
.J ...J
••w

F'EET

......... .........

I

�zl- &lt;
c:s:Zc,

..JQ:c

fl)

a.:E~

UJ

&gt;W.

cna:~
zu.z

..J

::c LI. 0
wou

w

:::,

(.)

a:

0
CJ

a.
OI-,:
o-w
(J

ct

w

,:

:E

::::&gt;

g

:i

ii:
IL

::E&gt;~

IX

I-

~

,

C

I
l:}--- - i r -- ~ - .L -

r--.. . .,_--

/

~ "'

~l(
I

.,_

-

~

�TABLE 26

EXISTING AND PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES
FREMONT CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT 1980-2000
1980

Main St. east of State
Main St. west of State
Main St. east of Stewart
Main St. west of Stewart
Darling north of Main
Division north of Main
Division south of Main
State St. west of Main
Stewart south of Main
Weaver north of Main
Dayton west of Mechanic
Source:

15,065
13,527
9,402
12,555
1,503
2,964
5,901
1,801
6,822
1,985
1,133

1985

1990

1995

2000

17,212
15,454
10,742
13,970
1,717
3,386
6,742
2,058
7,794
2,268
1,294

19,664
17,656
12,272
15,961
1,962
3,869
7,702
2,351
8,905
2,591
1,479

22,467
20,171
14,021
18,235
2,185
4,420
8,800
2,686
10,173
2,960
1,690

25,667
23,046
16,018
20,833
2,497
5,050
10,054
3,068
11,630
3,381
1,930

Actual traffic counts (1977-78) projected by Prein &amp; Newhof

Existing traffic information points out that some streets, particularly Main Street,
are heavily traveled. Traffic capacities for Ihe above streets have been computed.
The following table shows projected traffic volumes as related to traffic volume
capacities.
TABLE 27

PROJECTED TRAFFIC VOLUMES AND
ROAD CAPACITIES FOR SELECTED
STREETS, F~EMONT, MICHIGAN
200.'J
Road
Volu me s Capacities*

Main St. east of State
Main St. west of State
Main St. east of Stewart
Main St. west of Stewart
Darling north of Main St.
Darling south of Main St.
Division north of Main
Division south of Main
Stewart south of Main
Weaver north of Main St . .
. Dayton St. between Weaver
&amp; Stewart
Sheridan between Sullivan
&amp; Darling

11,620 ·
3,381

22,400
22,400
22,400
22,400
20,400
15,450
6,700
6,700
26,200
20,400

neg.

17,400

neg.

17,400

25,667
23,846
16,018
20,833
2, 497
5,05 0
10,05 4

* Average Daily Traffic Volumes

Source:

Prein &amp; Newhof

-68-

~eg. = Negligible

Deficiency
3,267
646

3,354

�Projections show that volumes on Main Street will increase to about 25,000 vehicles/
day by the year 2000 with capacities at slightly over 22,000 east and west of the
Central Business District core and just under 18,000 between Mechanic and Merchants
Streets.

There is no other place for traffic to go unless improvements are made in

side and parallel streets with eventual cut t hrough access to tie these roads to the
major circulation system of the City.

Major Thoroughfare Plan
Primary Roads - The plan continues to propose those roads already designated in the
primary system with the addition of Sheridan and Dayton Streets.

·M-82 which is a segment of Stewart, provides access to the City.

This road will

continue to be a part of the primary system bJt rerouted into the downtown one-way loop.

The proposed downtown one-way traffic systs.~ consists of a three-lane circulation loop
with with appropriate cut throughs, .widenings and alignments carrying traffic around the
Central Business District.

This network al lo,,;s for greater carrying capacity and

easier f1ow with a more desirable volume distribution resulting from increased lane
movement.

As pointed out through the anlaysis of traffic volumes and capacities of streets to
the year 2000, there will be deficiencies in the traffic carrying capability for Main
Street, with vo1umes reaching 25,000 vehicles per day.

As a result, we have proposed

the one-way traffic loop for Sheridan and Dayton Streets which wi 11 accommodate
17,400 vehicles in each direction.

This plan allows traffic circulation on Main Street but discourages any through traffic

-69-

�other than shoppers.
trians.

This is an attempt to return the area back to shoppers/pedes-

In addition, the Plan proposes the landscaping and general beautification

of Main Street within the Central Business District with the introduction of walkways and street furniture.

This is a sound approach since the best tactic to

compete with outlying shopping centers is to provide equal or better amenities.

Secondary Roads - The secondary road system is comprised basically of existing through
roads i"n the community such as:
Green Avenue

Luce Avenue

Stone Road

44th Street

Weaver Avenue

Lake Drive

Darling Avenue (north of Dayton Street) Lakeview Drive
Rams Horn Drive

56th Street

Analysis indicates no anticipated capacity problems in the future.

I
I

-I
I
I
I
I
I

In an attempt to redirect cross-town traffic through some of the older neighborhoods,
the plan suggests a future secondary arterial to connect Stewart Street with Stone
Road, generally adjacent to the school and cemetery properties, ,.and south of the
central portion of the City.

This proposed secondary road has several advantages.

It provides access to school

properties thus minimizing excess traffic through the neighborhood north of the school.
It allows for additional travel options for residents north of the central business
district who are traveling to the school areas and points south of the City.

In

addition, it provides a link between the eastern and western portions of the City without going through the Central Business District.

Furthermore, by extending Locust

Street in the industrial area, it will provide direct access to secondary streets,
thereby rerouting industrial traffic in and out of the City without traveling
through the Central Business District.

-70-

�There are some disadvantages associated with this secondary road.
a rather expensive project.

It would be

The City must assess the costs versus the benefits

to be derived prior to the implementation of such a project.

In addition, with

the development of the one-way system in the Central Business District, increased
road capacity will not be necessary.

Therefore, the new secondary road could

needlessly cause the traffic to bypass the Central Business District.

Certainly the growth and development of the industrial area to the west as well as
Central Business District and general commercial growth will have a direct bearing
on the need for such a facility.

Collector System - The collector system is comprised primarily of existing streets
such as:
Division Avenue

Hemlock Street

Hillcrest Avenue

State Street

Woods Street

Locust Street

Iroquois Drive

Apache Street

The plan suggests addtional roads to facilitate the movement of vehicles onto secondary
and primary arterials.

Therefore, the plan proposes the extention of 44th Street

east of Division Street, between Branstrom Park and Daisy Brook Elementary School to
Darling Street.

Also proposed is the extention of Locust Street in the industrial

area west to Green Avenue and east from the Chessie Railroad tracks to Stone Road,
extended connecting with the possible future secondary arterial running generally
east and west.

An alternate solution for the extension of Locust Street to the east

is the use of the existing unimproved road bed parallel to the rai_lroad right-of-way
between Connie and Sonte which intersects Stone Road at Oak.

See Figure 17 for a summary of the Major Thoroughfare Plan.
-71-

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008282">
                <text>Fremont_Comprehensive-Plan_1981</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008283">
                <text>Prein &amp; Newhof</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008284">
                <text>1981-02</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008285">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008286">
                <text>The Comprehensive Plan for the City of Fremont was prepared by Prein &amp; Newhof in February 1981.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008287">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008288">
                <text>Fremont (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008289">
                <text>Newaygo County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008290">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008292">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008293">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008294">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008295">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038324">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54698" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58969">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/217a89dce23702efac7b73fa7eb3ec1e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e9cf60aa9f1f778fcc5bde1cd382a448</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008281">
                    <text>•·

I

L.
L
L

L.
L
L
L
L
L
Lr
L

L

ste
an

�I

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF FORT GRATIOT

MASTER PLAN
I
I

•

JUNE, 1990

Charter Township of Fort Gratiot
Planning Commission

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
REGIONAL ANALYSIS

1

INTRODUCTION

1

HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

1

REGIONAL INFLUENCES

2

Relationship to Port Huron Urban Area
Southeast Michigan Council of Governments
St. Clair County Planning Commission
Port Huron Urban Area Transportation Study Committee
Other Regional Influences
LOCAL PLANNING INFLUENCES

2
7
8
9
10
10

PHYSICAL FEATURES

12

INTRODUCTION

12

EXISTING LAND USE

12

Residential
Commercial
Office
Industrial
Public and Semi-Public
Open Space
Utilities
Roads
Vacant

15
15
16
16
16
16
16
17
17

LAND DEVELOPMENT CONCERNS

17

Road Frontage Development
Commercial Strips
Mixed Land Use

17
18
18

WETLANDS

19

WOODLANDS

20

SOILS

21

Lando-Avoca Association
Wainola-Deford Association
Eastport-Wainola-Tobico Association
Bach Association
Alluvial Land-Rough Broken Land Association
PRIME AGRICULTURAL LAND

21
22
22
22
22
23

�,.

Table of Contents - Continued

POPULATION ANALYSIS

i

'

24

INTRODUCTION

24

POPULATION GROWTH TRENDS

24

AGE CHARACTERISTICS

29

HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS

33

POPULATION PROJECTIONS

35

I·•
I
I

•

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS

38

INTRODUCTION

38

COMMERCIAL AREA CONCEPTS

38

Shopping Centers
Commercial Strips

38

40

MARKET ANALYSIS

40

TRADE AREA

41

Primary Trade Area
Secondary Trade Area

41
42

INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS

44

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS

45

RESIDENT LABOR FORCE CHARACTERISTICS

45

FUTURE EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS

49

INDUSTRIAL PLANNING CONCEPTS

50

CONCLUSIONS

52

�/

Table of Contents - Continued

GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

I I

53

INTRODUCTION

53

POLICY BASIS

54

POLICY PURPOSE

54

THE MASTER LAND USE PLAN AS POLICY

54

DETERMINING POLICY

55

I_.

;

.

I '

'

i '

General
Residential (Low Density)
Residential (Medium Density)
Commercial
Industrial
Recreation/Open Space
Community Facilities
Transportation

55

56
57
57
58
59

60
60

LAND USE PLAN

!

'

-

' .

62

INTRODUCTION

62

RESIDENTIAL AREAS

62

COMMERCIAL

66

INDUSTRIAL

68

LANDFILL

68

LOW DENSITY BUFFER AREA

69

PUBLIC

69

OPEN SPACE/RECREATION

69

ROADS

69

~

- ----

~

-

--

�Table of Contents - Continued

COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLAN

,

..

'f

t

'I •.
I.,
'

I •
I ,

'

,

'

.. .

INTRODUCTION

71

PROTECTIVE SERVICES

71

Fire Fighting Facilities
Police Protection

73

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

73

CIVIC CENTER

73

UTILITIES

74

Sanitary Sewer Facilities
Public Water Distribution System
Storm Drainage

74
75
75

SCHOOLS

75

RECREATION PLAN

76

EXISTING RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS

76

RECREATION NEEDS
Neighborhood Unit Concept
Recreational Standards
Neighborhood Facilities
Community Parks
Other Recreation Needs

_;

71
73

LIBRARY

Township Facilities and Programs
School Sites

I•

71

76

77
77
77
81
81

84
85

�Table of Contents (Continued)

THOROUGHFARE PLAN

86

INTRODUCTION

86

THOROUGHFARE CLASSIFICATION

86

EXISTING THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM

90

,
I.

'

,

( -:'"''""

,' . '

; '

i.
l '.
l .J

State Routes
County Roads
Right-of-Way Standards
Traffic Volumes
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
North Street Bypass
Black River Bridge
Keewahdin Road
Major Thoroughfares
Secondary Thoroughfares
Collector Roads
Local Roads
CONCLUSION

.- j

I

.

90
90
90
91
91
92
92
92
93
93
93
93

94

�LIST OF TABLES
Table
1

2

Port Huron Urban Area
Population Growth Trends, 1960-1986

4

Port Huron Urban Area
Household Growth Trends, 1970-1986

5

Fort Gratiot Township
Existing Land Use - 1988

13

4

Comparative Population Growth Trends

26

5

Share of County Population

28

6

Current Population Estimates

28

7

Median Age Trends

29

8

Age Composition and Population Change

30

9

Age Distribution by Life Cycle Category

32

10

Household Growth Trends

34

11

Household Size

35

12

Population Projection Summary

36

13

Shopping Centers Classified by Type

39

14

Industry of Employment
Fort Gratiot Township &amp; St. Clair County - 1980

46

Occupational Characteristics
Fort Gratiot Township &amp; St. Clair County - 1980

47

16

1980 Employment by Place of Work

48

17

Projected Year 2000 Employment by Place of Work

49

18

Land Use Plan Acreage Allocations

70

19

Location Standards for Fire Stations

72

20

Capacity Population Estimates

79

21

Neighborhood Recreation Needs

82

22

Summary of Street Classification System

88

3

15

�LIST OF FIGURES
Figure
1
2

Port Huron Urban Area Population Growth Trends

4

Port Huron Urban Area Household Growth Trends

6

3

Comparative Growth Trends

27

4

Age Composition and Popula~ion Change

31

5

Age Distribu~ion by Life Cycle Ca~egory

32

6

Growth Trends and Projections
Fort Gratio~ Township

36

i.

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS
Illustration
1

Fort Gratiot Township Regional Location

2

Existing Land Use Map

14

3

Secondary Trade Area

43

4

Cluster Housing Solutions

65

5

The Neighborhood Unit Development Concept

78

6

Neighborhood Planning Areas

80

7

Lake Huron Park Conceptual Plan

83

8

Cross Section Standards

89

9

Master Plan

95

3

�REGIONAL ANALYSIS

INTRODUCTION
The growth and development of a community is strongly influenced
by its position within the larger region within which it is
located.
This position is a factor that, realistically, cannot
be changed, but which must be recognized and accommodated. Local
policies and decisions impacting land use, therefore, shou l d take
these regional influences into account to be relevant and effective.
Many factors influence the growth and development of a given
community.
Some relate to local decisions and can be controlled
by the local community; others result from actions or developments
outside the community and are, therefore, subject to somewhat less
local control.

(

,

i

.

I

•

r ,

I

The purpose of this opening chapter of the Fort Gratiot Township
Master Plan is to identify a framework of those factors that
influence growth in St. Clair County and Southeast Michigan as
a whole. This framework will help determine the growth potential
of the Township based on its position within the County and the
region.
It will further provide a basis for future planning
.
decisions and serve as a background for understanding the dynamics
of community growth. This chapter will also consider the plans
and policies of other governmental agencies that potentially may
impact future land development patterns in the Township.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
The historical development of the Port Huron urban area, including
Fort Gratiot Township, helps establish a basis for understanding
growth patterns and trends as they have impacted the Township over
time.

i"

The original settlement of the Port Huron area occurred in the
latter portion of the 17th Century. This settlement was related
to the location of the area along the St. Clair River at the
southern end of Lake Huron. The location had an obvious strategic
value for military, as well as commercial, purposes. Direct
access to the river and lake was a major asset to the area's first
major commercial activities: fur trading and lumbering. The
emergence of the railroad as an important form of transportation
in the mid-18O0's also served as a catalyst to growth in the area
as Port Huron was located on a major rail corridor linking
St. Clair County with other developing population centers,
including Chicago.

-1-

�Fort Gratiot Township became a recognized governmental unit in 1866.
For most of the Township's history, it has played an ancillary role
to Port Huron as the County's dominant city. Development in the
Township for many years was limited to the establishment of homes
along the Lake Huron shoreline and farming in the interior portions
of the community. A limited amount of non-farm residential growth
also occurred along the section line roads that served the Township.
During the second half of this century, the pace of growth
accelerated in the Township. As was the case earlier, much of this
development was concentrated along two of the Townshp's most scenic
areas: the Lake Huron and Black River shorelines. The lake also
attracted tourists to the area, many of whom eventually developed
summer cottages in the Township.
REGIONAL INFLUENCES
Relationship to Port Huron Urban Area

I.!

Fort Gratiot Township is part of a larger urban area which, for the
purposes of this analysis, includes · the City of Port Huron, Port
Huron Township, the City of Marysville, Kimball Township, and Clyde
Township (see Illustration 1). The population and household growth
characteristics of the Township, therefore, need to be considered
in relationship to trends that are occurring within this larger
g~ographic setting.
During the 26-year period of time between 1960 and 1986, the
Port Huron urban area increased hy a total of 7,734 persons, for
a growth rate of 12.6 percent. Over this same period of time,
Fort Gratiot Township experienced a population increase of approximately 2,700 persons, or nearly 50 percent. Only Marysville and
Clyde Township added more people during this same period.

I
\

. :

Current population estimates indicate that 12 percent of the urban
area's poopulation resides in Fort Gratiot Township. This figure
is second only to Port Huron's total of 49 percent and slightly
higher than Port Huron Township, Marysville, or Kimball Township's
share of the total urban area population base (see Table 1 and
Figure 1).
Although population increases have traditionally been used as the
popular method of assessing community growth trends, this particular
measure of growth has become less important in recent years. Decline
in population levels do not necessarily imply a loss of growth
altogether.
The decline in household size is the principal factor
accounting for declining population levels. Because of this trend,
the rate of new household formation is gaining acceptance over
absolute population increases as a more accurate measure of community
growth. For marketing purposes, the individual household is considered the basic spending unit that is critical to any assessment
of a community's economic growth potential.
It is, therefore,
important to consider this demographic variable as it relates to
Fort Gratiot Township and the Port Huron urban area as a whole.

-2-

�r..,

SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN
REGIONAL LOCATION
r'

f '
L

WASHTENAW
!

•

' ,
'

J

BURTCHNO

VILLE

SCAL(

I

,

i

I

,

I

I

I

CLYDE

PORT HURON

I

URBAN AREA

I

I

,I
PORT

HURON

-3-

1

�TABLE 1
PORT HURON URBAN AREA
POPULATION GROWTH TRENDS
1960-1986
Change
1960-1986

Change

8,290

2,702

48.4

33,981

33,770

-2,314

- 6.4

7,635

7,886

7,580

461

6.5

4,065

5,610

7,345

7,590

3,525

86.7

Kimball Twp.

6,266

6,152

7,180

6,870

604

9.6

Clyde Twp.

1,886

2,980

4,632

4,870

2,984

158.2

61,236

65,246

69,520

68,970

7,734

12.6

1960

1970

1980

5,588

7,075

8,496

Port Huron City

36,084

35,794

Port Huron Twp.

7,047

Marysville

Fort Gratiot Twp.

1986(1)

l .;

Percent

r-:

i '.
!
'

J

Urban Area Total
(1)

Estimate

Source:

u.s.

Bureau of the Census
FIGURE 1
PORT HURON URBAN AREA
POPULATION GROWTH TRENDS
CLYDE TWP (3 .1 ,:;)

FT GRATIOT (9 .2,:;)

L. "

MARYSVILLE (6 .7,:;)

. HURON TWP (11 .6%)

PORT HURON (59 .2,:;)

-4-

�Between 1970 and 1985, the Port Huron urban area experienced
an increase of 13,081 new households, for a growth rate exceeding
35 percent,
The greatest number of new households during this
period was formed in the City of Port Huron, followed by
Marysville and Fort Gratiot Township. More than 900 new households were created in the Township over this 15-year period,
representing an increase of slightly less than 50 percent. This
exceeds the household growth rate for the urban area as a whole.
Only Marysville and Clyde Township experienced more rapid
household growth rates during this period. Overall, Fort Gratiot
ranks second in the total number of urban area households at
11.8 percent (see Table 2 and Figure 2).

TABLE 2
PORT HURON URBAN AREA
HOUSEHOLD GROWTH TRENDS
1970-1986

Change
1970-1986

Percent
Change

1970(1)

1980( 1)

1985(2)

2,060

2,820

2,991

931

45.2

Port Huron City

11,632

12,782

13,024

1,392

12.0

Port Huron Twp.

2,151

2,591

2,666

515

23.9

Marysville

1,677

2,580

2,899

1,222

72.9

Kimball Twp.

1,671

2,209

2,256

585

35.0

777

1,376

1,451

674

86.7

19,968

24,358

25,287

5,319

26.6

Fort Gratiot Twp.

Clyde Twp.

Urban Area Total

Sources:

(1) U.S. Bureau of the Census;
(2) Southeast Michigan Council of Governments;

-5-

�FIGURE 2
HOUSEHOLD GROWTH TRENDS

14

,-----------------------------7

13

12
I

'

11 .

10
9
V) .......

0

Ill

8

..J 'O
0 C

:I: 0

7

4J Ill
Vl ::,

::&gt;

0

6

0~
:I: .._,

.

5

::

4

2

P. HURON TWP
PO.RT HURON

~ 1970

MARYSVILLE

~ 1980

~ 1985

Based on the preceding analysis of these trends, two conclusions
appear to be evident: 1) While the City of Port Huron retains a
dominant position relative to overall population and household
total, growth to an increasing degree is migrating out into the
surrounding suburban communities that comprise this dynamic urban
area; and 2) Fort Gratiot Township is fully participating in this
growth. One important consideration of this planning process
involves determining the role that the Township will continue to
play in the future growth of this larger urban area. A necessary
step towards addressing this concern involves considering other
regional planning influences that may also impact the Township in
the future.

-6-

.,
'

-

- - - --

�Southeast Michigan Council of Governments
Over the past decade, the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments
(SEMCOG) has emerged as the primary regional planning organization
for the seven-county Southeast Hichigan region.
SEMCOG's influence
originally stemmed from its role as the Federally mandated regional
review agency for this region. This role provided SEMCOG with an
opportunity to review and comment on all State and Federal grants
offered to local communities. This review was intended to provide
an opportunity to input a regional perspective to grant programs,
thereby ensuring a coordination among programs and avoiding a
duplication of effort. While this program was discontinued at the
Federal level, the process has been continued through the authority
of the Governor's office.
SEMCOG's role in the regional planning process has expanded over
the years beyond their original function of monitoring local
participation in Federal grant programs. Today, SEMCOG is
involved in other important regional planning activities including:
transportation planning, demographic and employment forecasting,
water quality planning, and economic development, among others.
To the extent that they are applicable, these activities should be
considered relative to their potential impact on the development
of the Master Plan for Fort Gratiot Township. Two aspects of
SEMCOG's role that will he considered here involve the 1990 Land
Use Policy Plan and the Small Area Forecast process.
SEMCOG's 1990 Plan divides Southeast Michigan into numerous
different land use categories. That portion of the Plan covering
Fort Gratiot Township divides the Township into several designated
areas. The northwestern portion of the community is shown as
suitable for agricultural production.
The area located along the
Lake Huron shoreline and much of the southeast corner of the
Township is classified as either existing or proposed urbanized
areas. Several fragile resource areas are also noted in the
Township, one of which is located along the Black River. No major
activity centers are identified by the Plan in Fort Gratiot
Township.
This policy plan has been subsequently modified through the
adoption of a regional sewer service area map. SEMCOG's growth
management philosophy generally favors the utilization of existing
sewer lines and unused treatment capacity, and discourages the
extension of utilities into unserved areas.
The Small Area Forecast process involves the development of a
series of population, household and employment projections for the
more than 200 individual communties located in the region.
These
forecasts are particularly useful for a wide range of planning
applications and will be referenced in subsequent sections of the
Master Plan.

-7-

�St. Clair County Planning Commission
The St. Clair County Planning Commission plays a central,
coordinating planning role on a county-wide basis. The County
also provides planning assistance to local units of government.
Two county-wide planning activities that will be considered here
include the County's Comprehensive Development Plan and the
Solid Waste Management Plan.

I •
\"

.:

I~
I
L

.

r ·,

'

I

I '

I

St. Clair County Comprehensive Development Plan - This plan,
which was prepared in the mid-1970's, is somewhat dated and,
as such, may not accurately reflect current development policies
or trends. Nevertheless, the plan should be considered for the
purpose of determining how the Township related to the rest of
the County in terms of anticipated development trends.
The plan anticipated low density residential development occurring
in the eastern one-third of the Township extending from the Lake
Huron shoreline west into the interior portions of the Township.
Medium density residential development is noted in the southeast
corner of the community near the Port Huron City limits.
Commercial development is shown at several major intersections
located along 24th Avenue, including the following:
Krafft,
Keewahdin and Carrigan.
Future commercial uses were also noted
near the intersection of Keewahdin and Pine Grove and Krafft and
State Roads.
Several recreation and public/semi-public locations are identified
in the plan. That portion of the Township lying along the Black
River is designated for recreation uses. The Township Hall and
cemetery site are shown as public land areas.

1 ··

l'

I, ....

An extensive area in the northern portion of the Township is
designated for transportation/communication/utility purposes.
This area encompasses the Detroit Water Board property Some
future industrial development was also anticipated for this area.
Another interesting feature of this plan was the planned extension
of a State arterial highway north through the Township. Such an
extension would obviously have important land use impact for the
land located in the path of this corridor and for the Township as
a whole.
Solid Waste Management Plan - The intent of this plan is to
consider how to meet the County's future solid waste disposal
needs. The plan also identifies existing and planned disposal
sites which potentially could have a significant impact on future
land use planning activities in the area.

-8-

�Several existing and closed landfill sites are identified by the
Plan in Fort Gratiot Township. These include one active Type II
landfill, one active Type III landfill, one inactive combination
Type II and III site, and an old Township dump site. All of these
sites are located in the east-central portion of the Township.
,--,
I •
I

Only one of these locations is carried forward and contained in
the final solid waste plan. This Type II disposal site is known
as the Eastern Michigan Development Company landfill and has a
maximum site size of 107 acres. This plan is currently in the
process of being updated by the County. This update process
should be monitored to determine any potential impact that the
plan may have on land use planning activities in the Township.
Port Huron Urban Area Transportation Study Committee
The Port Huron Urban Area Transportation Study Committee (PHUATS)
was established in 1982 to assist in the coordination of transportation planning and improvement efforts within the 11-community
urban area.

r-

i

r ..

l
I

' ..

!

"The urban transportation planning process includes the development
of a planning work program, transportation plan, and improvement
program, as well as providing a forum for cooperative decisionmaking.
The basic purpose of this transportation planning process
is to develop, monitor and refine long and short-range transportation and improvement plans with due consideration to their probable
social, economic and environmental impacts, as well as the safety
and mobility needs of the urbanized area population." PHUATS'
major areas of concern are described more fully below.
PHUATS is responsible for the development, maintenance and updating
of a long-range transportation plan for the urban area. The
current transportation plan, which anticipated transportation needs
and improvements to 1995, was adopted in 1976 and is currently
being updated to the year 2005.
The PHUATS plan provides the basis for the programming of transportation improvements. Each year a three-year Transportation
Improvement Program (TIP) is develoed, which includes highway
construction projects for all urban area communities. More than
$250,000 is available on an annual basis for road improvements
within the urban area. PHUATS is also responsible for reviewing
all other Federally-funded transportation projects in the study
area to determine conformance with the adopted Plan.
PHUATS also provides assistance to local units of government on
various transportation-related improvements. These include
obtaining project funding, expediting projects through the
implementation process, and providing transportation data and
analysis, among others.

-9-

�Fort Gratiot Township is included within the PHUATS urban area
and has a representative on the committee. The current adopted
PHUATS transportation plan and the eventual updated plan will
have an impact on land use planning activities within the
Township and, therefore, needs to be considered as part of this
planning process.
Other Regional Influences
Fort Gratiot Township has an extensive shoreline along Lake Huron.
The Township's authority to regulate the use of land does not
extend beyond the edge of this shoreline, however. Construction
activities within the water are shared by the U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources. The
latter agency also has the authority to regulate development
activity in designated wetland areas.
LOCAL PLANNING INFLUENCES
In addition to the other regional planning influences identified
earlier, Fort Gratiot Township is also influenced, to a limited
extent, by planning and development activities occurring in
neighboring communities. While it may not always be in the best
interest to mirror the examples established by surrounding
communities, cooperative planning activities should be encouraged
whenever practical and feasible • .

r,
l .
I
,.__

I

•

Four communities share a common boundary with Fort Gratiot
Township. These include Burtchville Township to the north,
Clyde Township to the west, and Port Huron City and Township to
the south. Both Burtchville and Clyde Townships are largely
agricultural and rural residential communities. The impact of
planning, zoning and development activities in these two
communities appears to be limited to well-defined areas.
In
Burtchville Township, this area is located along Lake Shore Drive
and the shoreline of Lake Huron where much of the Township's
development appears to be concentrated. The Clyde Township
Master Plan anticipates the most intense development pattern
along the Fort Gratiot Township boundary occurring in the area
proximate to the Black River. The remainder of this common
boundary is designated for agricultural purposes by the plan.
The influence of development activities in Port Huron Township
to the south is limited by the Black River which forms the common
boundary between these two neighboring communities. The Port
Huron Township Master Plan indicates that the area along the
river's banks is best suited for public or semi-public uses.
Much of the rest of the land in this general area is designated
for residential development of varying densities.

-10-

�_,

! .

Perhaps the strongest influence from surrounding communities
will come from the City of Port Huron to the south. These two
communities share an uneven boundary along Gratiot Avenue,
Krafft Road, the Black River Canal, and portions of Pine Grove
Avenue. Much of this common boundary has been zoned for
residential purposes. The major exceptions to this pattern occur
near the intersections of Pine Grove and Krafft and Pine Grove
and Holland. Both of these areas are zoned for commercial
purposes.
l

'.

I·~

I
I

•

.,
f

! ,

1..;

-11-

�PHYSICAL FEATURES

INTRODUCTION
The manner in which the land in a community is being used is
one of the basic determinants of the general character of the
community and its development potential. Land use patterns on
the periphery of a community also influence planning acti v ities
because of their potential impact on the community.
The use or misuse of a community's unique physical features can
also have significant and long-term consequences for the
development of an area.
It is, therefore, important to consider
these physical characteristics as part of any comprehensive
planning process and the extent to which these features offer
either opportunities or constraints for future land development
activities.

i \

.

I .

! .

'
'

J

The following narrative provides a detailed explanation of
Ft. Gratiot Township's physical land use features.
The main
component of this study is an examination of existing land use
characteristics on a category-by-category basis, and the extent
to which these features have changed over time. This study will
also examine other aspects of the physical environment that may
influence future development patterns. These include an
identification of State-designated wetlands, significant woodland
areas, soil types, prime agricultural lands and parcels enrolled
in the State farmland and open space preservation program.
EXISTING LAND USE

'
l ,

Existing land use data for Fort Gratiot Township was derived from
1985 aerial photography available through the Southeast Michigan
Council of Governments. The accuracy of this data was verified
through on-site field inspection on a Township-wide basis.
Information from both sources was subsequently transferred to a
Township base map using the different land use categories
reflected in Table 3. These categories were selected to portray
the existing land use pattern at a significant level of detail
and to facilitate comparison with previous land use surveys
conducted for the Township.
Fort Gratiot Township has a total land area of 10,240 acres
(16.0 square miles). Approximately one-third of this total land
area is currently developed.
The results of this survey for each
individual categort are summarized in Table 3, described in the
following narrative, and portrayed graphically in Illustration 2.

-12-

�TABLE 3
FORT GRATIOT TOWNSHIP
EXISTING LAND USE - 1988

Land Use Category

r

•

I',

'

.

Residential
Single Family
Multiple Family
Mobile Home

Area (Acres)
1,620.6
1,561.0
49.8
9.8

Office
:

·-·

.. ,
'j

,... ~:
l

Commercial
Convenience
General
Comparison

'-

~.

15.8
15.2
0.5
0.1

0.5

99.9
16.9
53.7
29.3

Percent of
Total Area

49.0
47.2
1.5
0.3

17.7

0.2

3.0

1.0
0.2
0.5
0.3

0.5
1.6
0.9

Industrial

102.7

3.1

1.0

Public

140.7

4.3

1.7

28.4

0.9

0.3

Open Space

338.6

10.2

3.3

Utilities

445.3

13.4

4.3

Roads

447.5

13.5

4.4

Water

63.4

1.9

0.6

Semi-public

I

Percent of
Developed Area

'

~

' .

Vacant

67.7

6,935.3

. ·-

Total Area

Source:

10,240.0

99.9

99.9

1985 SEMCOG aerial photography and 1988 field checks.

-13-

�1llllf
J

0

SINGLE

FAMILY

MULTIPLE

FAMILY

W

MOBILE

G)

OFFICE

@D

CONVENIENCE

COMMERCIAL

-

COMPARISON

COMMERCIAL

-

GENERAL

8

INDUSTRIAL

-

UTILITIES

HOME

PARK

COMMERCIAL

~ PUBLIC

®

SEMI - PUBLIC

@

RECREATION / OPEN

1988
EXISTING

en ,

-2

.,

_,... __JLr-,==',\=..f''\" .
P•,1

H•r1111

SPACE

LAND

FORT

GRATIOT

ST. CLAIR

COUNTY , MICHIGAN

USE

TOWNSHIP

FORT GRATIOT TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION

F"ttl

Seol•

,ooo

2000

Co111111uNiTy
8o'M - •

lOOO

4000

PlANNiNG

°' J.ROG ERs.u11u

&amp;

MANAGEMENT ,

P. C.

uTicA., Micki~AN

-14-

2

_ii

�i
Residential
Residential land uses, including single-family homes, multiplefamily dwellings, and mobile home parks, collectively occupy
slightly more than 1,600 acres of land.
This represents approximately one-half of the Township's developed land area and 15.8
percent of its total land area. Single-family homes comprise the
single largest residential sub-category, accounting for 96 percent
of all residential development in Fort Gratiot Township.

\.

-

IC

\

!

i

\,.

While residential development can be found in nearly all portions
of the Township, this land use feature is clearly concentrated in
the southern and eastern portions of the community, particularly
along the Lake Huron shoreline and along both sides of North River
Road. Single-family residential development is found in platted
subdivisions and along the forntages of the major arterial road
system. Most of the former is located south of Krafft Road and
east of 24th Avenue. Frontage residential development is located
throughout the Township.
Multiple-family units occupy nearly 50 acres of land, or 1.5 percent
of the Township's developed land area. These units are located in
several small complexes which are largely concentrated in an area
between Keewahdin Road and Krafft Road, immediately west of Lake
Huron. The community's newest multiple-family complex is located
near the intersection of 24th Avenue and Keewahdin Roads. Another
larger complex is located between North River Road and the Black River.

f •

I

•

Mobile home parks represent a relatively small portion of the
Township's developed or total land area (less than one percent
of either). One mobile home park is located on the south side of
Keewahdin Road, west of Fairway Drive. The second is located
approximately one mile due south, with access from Krafft Road.
This particular development appears to be a platted subdivision
with mobile homes located on individual lots of record.
Commercial
Fort Gratiot Township has a commercial base of nearly 100 acres,
which accounts for three (3) percent of the Township's developed
land area and one (1) percent of the total land area.
Slightly more
than one-half of this land area, or some 53.7 acres, is classified
as general commercial development. Convenience and comparison
commercial uses occupy 16.9 and 29.3 acres of land respectively.
With some minor exceptions, the Township's commercial development
is concentrated along the 24th Avenue corridor leading north from
the City of Port Huron. This corridor extends from the Township's
southern boundary near the Black River Canal to Carrigan Road on
the north. The most intensely developed portion of this corridor
occurs from Krafft Road south. Outside of this corridor some
commercial development can be found at isolated areas elsewhere
in the community.
In many instances, these commercial uses
intrude into established residential neighborhoods.

-15-

�I
Office

.,

r •

Office development accounts for a very small percentage of either
the Township's developed or total land area. Approximately 18
acres of land are being used for this purpose in Fort Gratiot
Township. Most of this office development is concentrated along
the previously identified commercial corridor. A consolidated,
planned office park is currently under development along 24th
Avenue, south of Keewahdin Road.
Industrial

..

'

....,
l

l.

1.:

Industrial uses occupy slightly more than 100 acres of land,
which account for three (3) percent of the Township's developed
land area, or one (1) percent of the total land area. Nearly
all of this acreage is concentrated in seciton 16 in the east
central portion of the Township. An active landfill accounts
for most of this acreage.
Some more traditional industrial
establishments can be found along 24th Avenue .east of the
landfill and at several other locations throughout the Township.
Excluding the landfill, which was classified as industrial
because of the intensity of the land being used, Fort Gratiot
Township lacks an identifiable industrial base.
Public and Semi-Public
Collectively, public and semi-public uses comprise approximately
five (5) percent of the Township's developed land area, with the .
former occcupying the greater amount of land area. These public
uses consist of four school sites and the Township cemetery, all
of which occupy larger parcels of land. Semi-public uses consist
primarily of churches.
Open Space

,·,
I .
l ..

Land being used for open space and recreation purposes accounts
for 338.6 acres of land, or ten (10) percent of the Township's
developed land area. This category is dominated by several golf
courses, two Township parks, and one horse-riding facility.
Most
of these uses are concentrated in the southern one-third of the
community.
Utilities
Land being used for utility purposes occupies 445 acre of land in
Fort Gratiot Township. The single largest of these uses consists
of the Detroit Metropolitan Water and Sewage facility, which
alone covers 436 acre of land in Section 5 along the Township's
northern boundary. The Township's remaining utility land uses
consist of several smaller facilities which include a water tower,
electrical sub-station, and a sewage treatment lagoon. These uses
are located primarily in the central portions of the Township.

-16-

�,
Roads
A direct relationship exists between the amount of land used for
road purposes and a communityrs degree of urbanization.
For
example, more populated or densely settled communities typically
have a greater proportion of their total land area reserved for
road right-of-way purposes than sparsely populated communities.
Within Fort Gratiot Township, roads account for 13.4 percent of
the community's developed land area (447.3 acres). These roads
include the major or section line road system and local
subdivision streets.
Vacant
Vacant, undeveloped land represents the single largest individual
land use category. Nearly 7,000 acres of land remains undeveloped
within the Township. This represents approximately two-thirds of
the Township's total land area. Aside from both the Township's
shoreline areas which are nearly solidly developed, vacant,
undeveloped land is evident throughout the community.
LAND DEVELOPMENT CONCERNS
I-,

I-

'.
I

t .

i .

, -

\

A principal function of the existing land use survey is to offer
some insight regarding the extent to which land development
patterns and practices influence, either positively or negatively,
future pevelopment potential. An identification of these problems
will help provide a basis for the Township to consider solutions
to these issues at subsequent phases of the planning process.
Specific problem areas are described below.
Road Frontage Development
One of the major land use concerns noted in the 1965 Plan was the
tendency for residential development to occur along the frontages
of the Township's major or section line road system. This
practice remains a problem today and creates numerous planning
problems.
One such problem is the multiple points of vehicular access that
this land use pattern creates. The proliferation of individual
driveways along highly travelled roads creates a potential for
traffic-related problems, especially as vehicles enter and leave
individual sites.
Related to this issue is the development of single-family homes
on long, narrow lots. One consequence of land subdivision
practices in Michigan has been the creation of long, narrow lots
which may meet the frontage requirements of the Zoning Ordinance,

(

--17-

�i

r~

I,,

l .
! '
I. -

but which have excessive depths that result in substantial
quantities of vacant, unusable land.
Typical development
activities on these lots normally occupy the front 200 feet in
depth, with the remaining depth left undeveloped.
Acceptable
land subdivision practices normally allow for a maximum
depth-to-width ratio of l-to-4.
In many instances throughout
the community, there exist situations where existing singlefamily lots exceed this standard by excessive margins.
Another consequence of this development practice is that they
frequently result in the isolation of a significant amount of
interior acreage.
The assembly and eventual development of this
remaining acreage is often difficult to accomplish. This
problem is evident in southern or more developed portions of
the Township, particularly south of Krafft Road.
Commercial Strips

f '.

A universal problem faced by many urban communities is the
placement of commercial activities in a linear and unplanned
fashion along major highway corridors. One such corridor is
emerging in Fort Gratiot Township along 24th Avenue.
The most
extensive developed portion of this corridor is located in the
extreme southeast corner of the Township where Pine Grove Avenue
leaves Port Huron and enters Fort Gratiot.
This area shares most
of the features that typically characterize this form of development, including multiple driveways, excessive signage, and a lack
of landscaping, among others. As the Township continues to grow,
careful attention should be directed towards controlling the form
of future commercial development to effectively avoid the
extension of this linear commercial district and its attendant
problems.
Mixed Land Use
Another land use concern observed during the field survey of the
Township is the use of land for commercial or industrial uses in
what are otherwise residential areas.
In numerous instances
along the section line road system, single-family uses share land
with a commercial or industrial use.
This pattern, while not
widespread, does offer a potential for creating land use conflicts
with adjoining, less intense residential neighbors.
A related compatibility problem involves the use of residential
parcels for a variety of outdoor storage purposes. This type of
storage frequently detracts from the overall character and
quality of a residential neighborhood.
As part of subsequent planning activities, increased attention
needs to be directed to the transition of different land uses,
with particular emphasis on the treatment of the edges or
boundaries of different uses. Correspondingly, another area of
concern involves providing for more effective buffers between
potentially incompatible land use activities.

-18-

�I
WETLANDS
Wetlands serve a number of important environmental functions
that need to be considered during a community-wide planning
process. Among other functions, wetlands affect water quality
by trapping and storing the nutrients from upland runoff in
plant tissue and serving as a settling basin for slit generated
from upland erosion. This natural filtering function, however,
can be seriously damaged by poor land use practices. Since
every wetland has a unique tolerance for filtering runoff from
the uplands surrounding it, development in these adjacent areas
can create more nutrient and sediment inflow than the wetland is
able to absorb.
Moreover, development in and around the fringe
of the wetland itself can destroy its ecological health and,
thus, its filtering ability. Sediments and nutrients from
upland development can overload and damage the natural system,
turning the wetland into a settling basin of polluted and
unpleasant smelling water.

! ,
f

l

'

.

r ,
i
j
I

'

l

l

While wetlands operate as natural nutrient filters, they can
easily be overloaded and, thus, destroyed. Through increased
storm water runoff and nutrients from fertilizers and urban
development, this entire process is accelerated as much as one
hundred times as fast as the natural process. Consequently, a
wetland that may have served as an important nutrient filtering
area for 1,000 years may only function that way for ten years
once it has been overloaded.
Even more serious is the removal of wetlands. The removal of
these natural features by dredging or filling will have an
immediate impact on the water quality of streams and lakes below
them in the watershed system. Preserved wetlands improve water
quality, moderate floods, and stabilize water supplies, thereby
providing for overall environmental health and stability.
Development in and around wetlands are regulated by the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources pursuant to the provisions of
the Goemaere-Anderson Wetlands Protection Act. This legislation
generally regulates the development of wetlands over five (5)
acres in size, or which are contiguous to the Great Lakes or to
a river, stream, pond or inland lake. Permits are required by
this legislation for the following activities:
1) Depositing or
placing fill material in a wetland; 2) dredging or removing soil
from a wetland; 3) constructing, operating, or maintaining any
use or development in a wetland; and 4) draining surface water
from a wetland. State law does provide procedures whereby these
activities may be permitted in a wetland, depending on whether
or not certain criteria are met.

-19-

�Some designated wetlands appear to be located in Fort Gratiot
Township. The identification of these wetlands is based on
aerial photography interpretation. Actual on-site inspection of
these areas by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources is
necessary to precisely determine the characteristics and extent
of these wetlands.
WOODLANDS

l_.,

Large wooded areas also serve significant environmental functions
that need to be recognized and acknowledged.
A wooded area can
be of great value to a watershed area. The canopy of trees aid
in breaking the force of precipitation, thereby decreasing
erosion.
Erosion is further inhibited by the fibrous root
system of the understory plants, as well as the layer of leaf or
needle litter. Woodlands can also reduce the volume of
stormwater runoff. Clearcut lands can produce excessive runoff
unless trees are replaced by other vegetation with comparable
water retaining capacity.
With no soil and vegetation to
moderate runoff from precipitation, flooding may result, in
addition to a loss of precipitation ordinarily retained and
recharged into groundwater reserves by the woodland.
Woodlands improve air quality and afford protection from wind
and erosion. Leaves and branches moderate the strength of winds
and, when moisted with dew or rainwater, reduce suspended
particles in the air, which are later washed off with rainwater.
Plants also serve to moderate the effect of chemical pollutants
in the air by absorbing some ozone, carbon dioxide, and sulfar
dioxide.

r'
\. J

[ .

'
I •

I

l

'

·•

A dense stand of trees can significantly cut noise from adjacent
factories or highways by six to eight decibels per 100 feet of
forest.
Moreover, the moderating effects of forests on
temperature and wind can significantly cut the sound-carrying
capacity of the atmosphere.
The resilience of woodlands creates a microclimate around the
tree stand itself. Woodland qualities which moderate and buffer
temperature, precipiation, runoff, wind and noise are features
of this microclimate effect. The benefits of this microclimate
effect to surrounding urban and suburban areas can be
significant.
An urban area devoid of vegetation is the exact
opposite of the forest microclimate.
It increases the range of
temperature fluctuations much like the climatic extremes of a
desert.

-20-

�The sun's energy striking streets and buildings is changed into
heat, further increasing the temperature on a hot day; at night,
the buildings lose heat and offer no protective cover from night
chill or winter winds.
Thus, if woodlands are interspersed among
built-up areas, the effects of their microclimates can be felt in
adjacent urban areas, moderating fluctuations in temperatures by
keeping the surrounding air cooler in the summer and daytime and
warmer in the winter and evening.
The significance of woodlands is given added weight by the less
quantifiable benefits that they provide to the public.
Not only
are woodlands important buffers, they also add aesthetic values
and provide attractive sites for recreational activities such as
hiking, camping, and other passive recreational pursuits.

r •

!

I .

Continued stability of good real estate values is a secondary
benefit offered by woodlands.
Since people choose to live in and
around woodlands, providing for woodland protection in the
planning of development projects will maintain favorable real
estate values.
Fort Gratiot Township is fortunate inasmuch as extensive portions
_of the community are occupied by large, woodland areas. These
are located throughout the community. The most extensive wooded
areas are located in the southern and eastern portions of the
Township.
While the variety and quality of existing trees
·
obviously vary from location to location, the extensiveness of
this woodland coverage offers ample opportunities to incorporate
existing vegetation into future development activities.

,__
SOILS
Soil characteristics are an important determinant of land use
potential. Not only do soils influence the suitability of land
for agricultural purposes, they also help determine whether or
not a parcel is suitable for more intense forms of urban development including housing, roads, and utilities. The suitability of
different soil classifications for the installation of on-site
sewage dispoal systems is particularly important for areas that
are not served by municipal disposal systems.
Fort Gratiot is
composed of five main generalized soil associations which are
described below.
Lando-Avoca Association
The most prominent soils in this association are somewhat poorly
drained and have high water tables which require drainage prior
to development. These soils occur in areas that are largely
cleared and cultivated. They are further characterized by low
natural fertility and may be droughty in mid-summer.
These soils
are mainly concentrated in the northwest portion of the Township.

-21-

�I
Wainola-Deford Association
The soils that constitute the major portions of this association
are somewhat poorly drained.
Some minor soil categories in this
larger group, however, have better drainage characteristics.
Some areas within this association have been cleared and
cultivated, while others are either urbanized or are idle.
The major soils in this group have low fertility and low
available water capacity.
Further, they have a high seasonal
water table and require drainage. These soils are confined to
the southwestern portion of the Township, south of Keewahdin and
west of Pine Grove Roads.
Eastport-Wainola-Tobico Association
,

'

.

This association occurs on glacial-like beaches along the shoreline of Lake Huron in a landscape characterized by a pattern of
ridges and troughs.
The prominent soils in this association
range from well-drained to poorly-drained soils. Also included
in this association are Alluvial land and the sandy lake beaches
of Lake Huron. These areas are generally poorly drained and
occur on the floodplains.
Most of the area occupied by these
soils were either cleared or cut over.
In many cases, the soils
have been developed for summer cottages or more fully urbanized.
These soils occur in Fort Gratiot Township along the Lake Huron
shoreline, extending west to a depth of approximately one mile.
Bach Association

r ,

Soils in this association occur in glacial drainageways and on
lake plains. The landscape is nearly level, but has broad,
slightly depressed areas.
For the most part, these soils have
poor drainage chracteristics. They are also characterized by a
high water table and are subject to periodic flooding.
A
relatively small portion of the Township is covered by soils in
this associ~tion.
This area is located parallel to the Lake
Huron shoreline, adjacent to the previously described association.
Alluvial Land-Rough Broken Land Association
This association occurs on the floodplains and steep bluffs of
the major rivers and streams throughout St. Clair County. More
particularly in Fort Gratiot Township, these soils occur along
the Black River, the Township's southern boundary. The general
landscape is broad to narrow, generally deeply incised valleys.
The Alluvial land component of this association is the active
floodplains of the rivers and streams that is either level to
gently sloping.
Rough broken land is strongly sloping to very
steep and consists of bluffs or excarpments that border the outer
edges of the floodplains and the higher uplands. Most areas of
this association are pastured, forested, or idle and covered with
brush. Alluvial land has a seasonal high water table and is
subject to the following.
Rough broken land is subject to severe
erosion and is too steep and rough for most uses.

-22-

�I

PRIME AGRICULTURAL LAND
Soil data is the principal source of information used by the
U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (SCS)
to determine those areas of the Country that have the greatest
potential for long-term agricultural production. St. Clair
County includes a considerable amount of land that has been
designated by the SCS to be either prime or unique farmland.
Much of this land is confined to the western portions of t he
County. A relatively small proportion of the County's prime
agricultural land is located in Fort Gratiot Township. These
areas are confined primarily to the northwest and central
portions of the Township.
The long-term use of this land for agricultural purposes will be
influenced by factors other than just soil characteristics.
These factors include land speculation activity, increasing land
values, taxation and assessment practices, and general economic
trends.
The desirability of preserving land for long-term
agricultural purposes and to accommodate the demand for a range
of urbanized uses are situations that will be addressed during
the planning process.
; ·. ..

-23-

�I
POPULATION ANALYSIS

INTRODUCTION
The population of a community, its composition and characteristics,
is a basic ingredient in planning for the future.
Historical and
current population trends can be used in various ways. They
illustrate problem areas of development and provide an indication
of probable future needs.
Proper planning of future land use,
roads, and community facilities must take the existing distribution of population and future projections into consideration.
The population study is linked to the general health, safety, and
welfare of the area residents through the following four
objectives:
1.

To guide the distribution of populations and prevent overconcentration.

2.

To ensure orderly development by closing in unplanned gaps
left between residential areas.

3.

To provide the necessary air, light and open space.

4.

To dimension the need for community facilities, utilities,
and other development features required to serve the growing
community.

This analysis will consider the characteristics of the Township's
population, how the population has changed over time, and the
extent to which these characteristics may influence future planning
related decisions.
Included in this analysis is a discussion of
population growth trends, age and household characteristics, and
anticipated future population levels.
POPULATION GROWTH TRENDS
I .

Fort Gratiot Township has experienced significant population
growth over the course of the past 50 years.
In 1930, for
example, the Township had a population of approximately 1,000
persons. By 1980, this population grew to a level approaching
8,500 persons, for an increase of 743.7 percent. During this
50-year period, the Township has experienced consistently strong
population growth, averaging nearly 1,500 new people each decade.
The Township's greatest period of population growth occurred
between 1950 and 1960, when the Township's population increased
by 2,091 persons.

-24-

�Fort Gratiot is one of the leading growth communities in the
Port Huron metropolitan area and for the County as a whole.
Between 1930 and 1980, the Township outpaced the City of Port
Huron, Port Huron Township, and Kimball Township relative to
total population gain and percent of population increase.
The Township's growth rate for this period of time was also
higher than that reported for St. Clair County as a whole
(see Table 4 and Figure 3).
Fort Gratiot Township's share of St. Clair County's population
has risen consistently since 1930 when 1.5 percent of the
County's population resided in the Township.
By 1980, this
share had risen to 6.1 percent, placing it second to the
City of Port Huron among other nearby communities (see Table 5).

.

.'
I

)

•

.

While a complete census of population is not scheduled to
occur again until 1990, it is possible to gain some insight
into population changes that have occurred for the Township
and surrounding communities since the 1980 census was conducted.
Population forecasts for 1985 were prepared for all Southeast
Michigan communities by SEMCOG. Population estimates are also
prepared by the U.S. Bureau of the Census.
These forecast and
estimate results are summarized in Table 6.
The SEMCOG forecast totals suggest that Fort Gratiot Township
increased by approximately 500 people between 1980 and 1985. This
increase is second only to Port Huron, which showed an increase of
2,734 persons. This anticipated gain for the City is interesting
to note in light of the population declines experienced by the
City since 1960. The Census estimates suggest a five (5) percent
growth rate for the County, with modest increase shown for Fort
Gratiot Township and the City of Port Huron.
Slight declines are
noted for both Kimball and Port Huron Townships.
Neither estimate included in Table 6 can be considered conclusive.
The SEMCOG figure suggests that population growth is continuing
to occur in the Township abeit at a lesser rate than occurred
during the previous decade. The census estimate, on the other
hand, suggests a stable population base. The 1990 Census will
provide a more conclusive answer to the question of population
growth trends over the past decade.
Port Huron has traditionally been, and to a large extent remains,
the dominant community in St. Clair County. As is the case with
other urban centers, however, there has been a trend away from
the central City into the adjoining suburban communities. The
population growth trends evident in the preceding tables indicate
that the communities surrounding the City of Port Huron are fully
participating in the overall growth of the larger urban area,
while the City's population remains static.
Fort Gratiot
Township has emerged as, perhaps, the leading growth community in
this urban area.

-25-

�TABLE 4
COMPARATIVE POPULATION GROWTH TRENDS

. ·' '

Ft.
Gratiot
Twp.

City of
Port
Huron

Port
Huron
Twp.

Kimball
Twp.

St.
Clair
County

1930 Population

1,007

31,361

2,709

1,723

67,563

1940 Population
'30-'40 Change
Percent Change

1,620
613
60.4

32,759
1,398
4.0

3,440
731
27.0

3,107
1,384
80.0

76,222
8,659
12.8

1950 Population
'40-'50 Change
Percent Change

3,497
1,877
116.0

35,72B
2,~66
9.1

5,875
2,435
70.0

4,950
1,843
59.0

91,599
15,377
20.0

5,588
2,091
60.0

36,084
359

''-·

1960 Population
'50-'60 Change
Percent Change

LO

7,047
1,172
20.0

6,266
1,316
26.0

107,201
15,602
17.0

.

1970 Population
'60-'70 Change
Percent Change

7,075
1,487
26.6

35,794
290
0.8
-

7,635
588
8.3

-

6,152
114
1.8

120,175
12,974
12.1

1980 Population
'70-'80 Change
Percent Change

8,496
1,421
20.1

33,981
-1,813
- 5.1

7,886
251
3.3

7,180
1,028
16.7

138,802
18,627
15.5

1930-1980 Change
Percent Change

7,489
743.7

2,620
8.4

5,177
191.1

5,457
316.7

71,239
105.4

... ~.2

; -,
i

L.

.!

l.

w

iI

j- ...

'
''

, .
'--

-

i '

Source:

U.S. Bureau of the Census

-26-

�The Township's extensive Lake Huron shoreline and the location of
the Township along one of the urban area's major transportation
corridors help account for this growth. The extent to which the
Township will remain a leading growth corridor will be considered
as part of the discussion on population projections.

FIGURE 3
COMPARATIVE GROWTH TRENDS

I
! .,,

40 . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ,

,1

l .

35

I
L

•

30

I .

l·

z,.....,

25

Q~

I- C

j ~

::, ::J

20 -

CL O
0 J;
CL t:,

15

10

5

PORT HURON

m

1930

~

1940

~

1950

P.HURON TWP

~

-27-

19so

ISS:l

1970

KIMBALL TWP

rz211980

�~

.!

TABLE 5
;

SHARE OF COUNTY POPULATION

.,

t !

t

t

'

.:'

"9

f;

i-i

r,
I

\

' .,

Year

Fort
Gratiot
Twp.

City of
Port
Huron

Port
Huron
Twp.

Kimball
Twp.

1930

1.5

46.4

4.0

2.6

1940

2.1

43.0

4.5

4.1

1950

3.8

39.0

6.4

5.4

1960

5.2

33.7

6.6

5.9

1970

5.9

29.8

6.4

5.1

1980

6.1

24.5

5.7

5.2

I

I
I •

.:.: .. ;!

TABLE 6

. .,
..

CURRENT POPULATION ESTIMATES
Ft.
Gratiot
Twp.

City of
Port
Huron

Port
Huron
Twp.

Kimball
Twp.

St.
Clair
Countr

1980 Population

8,496

33,981

7,886

7,180

138,802

1985 Population(l)
'80-'85 Change
Percent Change

9,015
519
6.1

36,715
2,734
8.1

7,935
49
0.6

7,105
75
1.0

-

145,932
7,130
5.1

1988 Population(2)
'80-'86 Change
Percent Change

8,520

34,590
609
1.8

7,800
86
1.1

7,040
- 140
- 1.9

145,800
6,998
5.4

,.,
I

,!

. ...,

l

24

0.2

-

(l)

Southeast Michigan Council of Governments,
Small Area Forecasts, 6/84.

(2)

u.s.

Bureau of the Census Estimate

-28-

�I
•

1

AGE CHARACTERISTICS
An important demographic factor influencing planning is the age
composition of a community and the extent to which this
composition has changed over time.
This is particularly useful
for anticipating future Township service demands and land use
requirements.

I •

\

I

I,.

The 1980 Census revealed some significant changes that occurred
in the age of the nation's population. These changes have
similarly had an impact on the population of both St. Clair
County and Fort Gratiot Township. Among the most significan t
changes revealed by the Census was the continued aging of the
nation's population. This trend is reflected in median age
figures in Table 7. Median age for the nation as a whole rose
to a level of 30 years in 1980. Consistent with the larger
trend, median age levels for Fort Gratiot Township, St. Clair
County and the State of Michigan also rose during this period.
For the Township, median age rose from 25.8 in 1970 to 29.2 years
in 1980. This figure is similar to the county-wide number, both
of which are higher than similar figures for Michigan, but less
than the United States as a whole.
Projected median age
statistics available from the Southeast Michigan Council of
Governments suggest that the Township's median age rose slightly
to 29.6 years by 1985.

TABLE 7
r'
!
I

MEDIAN AGE TRENDS

,_i '

1970 (1)

1980 ( 1)

1985 (2)

Fort Gratiot Township

25.8

29.2

29.6

St. Clair County

26.8

29.0

30.6

Michigan

26.3

28.8

United States

28.3

30.0

·-1- ·
I

l.,_

r,

i
!' '

: i
~

~

(1)

u.s.

Bureau of the Census;

( 2 ) Southeast Michigan Council of Governments.

,

·

'

-29-

�I
Between 1970 and 1980, Fort Gratiot Township experienced a
population increase of 1,421 persons. By reviewing the various
age categories that comprise the Township's total population,
it is possible to determine how individual age groups changed
during this ten-year period and which groups made the largest
contribution to the Township's overall population increase.
Ten of the twelve age categories shown in Table 8 and Figure 4
reported an increase between 1970 and 1980. The single largest
population gain occurred in the 25-34 age category, which
expanded by 456 persons between 1970 and 1980. Large increases
are also noted for the 35-44 age group (+259) and the 15-19
group (+303). Only two groups lost population between 1970 and
1980. Children under the age of ten declined by 269 persons
during this period.
' ,,
.

'l

L

.! '
i_

While nearly every age group contributed to the Township's overall
population increase during the 1970's, the overall increase was
clearly the result of individuals between the ages of 25 and 54.
This age group increased by 879 persons between 1970 and 1980,
for an increase of 62 percent.

TABLE 8
AGE COHPOSITION AND POPULATION CHANGE

1980

1970
[" .

'~
r

~

Number

Under 5 years
5-9
10-14
15-19
20-24
25-34
35-44
45-54
55-59
60-64
65-74
75+

663
901
829
638
433
956
874
801
310
233
318
119

9.4
12.7
11.7
9.0
6.1
13.5
12.4
11.3
4.4
3.3
4.5
1.7

589
706
851
941
597
1,412
1,133
943
383
316
401
224

6.9
8.3
10.0
11.1
7.0
16.6
13.3
11.1
4.5
3.7
4.7
2.6

- 74
-195
22
303
164
456
259
142
73
83
83
105

7,075

100.0

8,496

99.8

1,421

Total
Source:

%

U.S. Census Bureau

-30-

Number

%

Age Groue

Change

�'

.

1 ·· '

I ~

FIGURE 4
AGE COMPOSITION AND POPULATION CHANGE

1.5

r-----------------------------,

1.4
1.3
1.2
1.1

\

\.. .

0 .9
0 .8

( .

0 .7

L

0 .6
0 .5
0 .4
0 .3
0 .2
0 .1
Under 5

10-14
5-9

20-24
1 5-19

~ 1970

I I

L.

35-44
25-34

55-59
45-54

60-64

65-74
Over 75

~ 1980

It is possible to obtain another perspective on the changes that
are occurring to the age structure of the Township's population
by combining individual age groups into larger categories that
more closely resemble identifiable stages of a normal life cycle:
pre-school, school, adolescent/family formation, middle-age and
senior citizens. Table 9 and Figure 5 display the share of Fort
Gratiot's and St. Clair County's population that is included in
each category. This table and figure further show how the share
of each of these categories have changed since 1970.
The pre-school category is a good short-range indicator of future
school enrollment trends and the impact that these trends may
have on the use of existing or planned school facilities.
Between 1970 and 1980, Fort Gratiot Township experienced a
decline in this age group's share of the Township's total
population from 9.4 percent to 6.9 percent. Projected age data
to 1985 suggests a slight increase for this category to 7.2
percent. The data for St. Clair County shows a continued decline
for this age group between 1970 and 1980.

-31-

�TABLE 9
AGE DISTRIBUTION BY LIFE CYCLE CATEGORY
1970
Age
Category
:

-;

l

i ..

lI - .
I

Pre-School
(0-4)

Fort
Gratiot

Twp.

1980
St.
Clair
County

Fort
Gratiot

Twp.

1985
St.
Clair
County

Fort
Gratiot
Twp.

St.
Clair
County
7.5

9.4

9.3

6.9

7.7

7.2

School
(5-19)

33.5

31.8

29.4

27.9

27.6

26.0

Family
Formation
(20-44)

32.0

28.6

37.0

34.8

37.5

36.6

Middle Age
(45-64)

19.0

20.4

19.3

19.0

19.9

19.8

6.2

9.9

10.7

7.8

o.o

Senior
Citizens
(65+)

7.4

'

\

FIGURE 5
AGE DISTRIBUTION BY LIFE-CYCLE CATEGORY

40
! -

35

z

30

0

g
:::,

a.
0
a.

25

I..

0

,

-

20

I-

zw
u

ex:

w
a.

15

10

5

0
Middle Age

School

~ 1970

~ 1980

~ 1985

-32--

-

-

-

-

-

�The school-age category also provides some evidence of the demand
for school and recreation facilities.
This category's share of
the Township's total population is declining.
In 1970, for
example, approximately one-third of all Township residents were
between the ages of 5 and 19. By 1980, this group declined to
a 29.4 share. Projections for 1985 indicate a continued decline
to 27.6 percent. A similar trend is evident for St. Clair County
as a whole.

.-·,

,,.....
l.
I

L..

'

.

\'

.

f '

'

The family formation and middle-age categories comprise more than
one-half of the Township's total population and are increasing
their share of the Township's overall population. Collectively,
these two categories represent the foundation of the community.
These categories represent the community's largest share of
property owners and taxpayers. They are also consumers of goods
and services, thereby serving as a catalyst for economic growth.
Between 1970 and 1985, these categories' share of the Township's
population increased from 51 percent to 57.4 percent. Similar
increases are also noted for St. Clair County.
Nationwide, senior citizens are becoming a more important segment
of the overall population base. As the number of seniors
continues to grow, greater demands will be generated for passive
recreation opportunities, convenient transportation, as well as
specialized housing and health care services. The national trend
noted above is similarly reflected in Fort Gratiot Township's
population, although to a somewhat lesser extent.
In 1970,
senior citizens comprised 6.2 percent of the Township's population.
By 1985, this figure rose to 7.R percent. A greater share of the
County's population is 65 years old or older, than is the case
for the Township.
HOUSEHOLD CHARACTERISTICS
Household characteristics in general, and the rate of new
household formations in particular, have become increasingly
important as indicators of demographic change and economic
growth.
The growth of new households, in fact, may be a better
determinant of economic growth within a community than absolute
increases in the population itself.
Among the more significant trends revealed by the 1980 census was
the rate of new household formations. Michigan offers a good
example of this trend.
In spite of a low population growth rate
of 4.3 percent between 1970 and 1980, Michigan experienced the
formation of 500,000 new households during this period, for an
increase of 20 percent. Accompanying this change in household
formations was an equally noticeable decline in ~he size of the
average household. At the national level, household size
declined to a record low of 2.75 persons per household.

-33-

�I

'

,_

l _,

'I

i.

r •
l

Three factors are largely held responsible for these trends:
1) increased numbers of people living alone, either before
marriage or after divorce; 2) smaller families, with women having
fewer children; and 3) more elderly women outliving their
husbands.Cl)
The aging of the "baby boom" generation has also
had an impact on the rate of new household formations. Many
members of the baby boom generation reached the age when they
began forming their own households during the 1970s, contributing
significantly to the number of new households.
Both Fort Gratiot Township and St. Clair County shared in the
rapid rate of household formation that characterized the ten-year
period between 1970 and 1980. During this period, approximately
760 new housholds were formed in the Township, for an increase of
36.9 percent. This is slightly higher than the rate of household
formation of 29.9 percent which occurred on a County-wide basis.
Approximately seven (7) percent of all new households formed in
the County between 1970 and 1980 were established in Fort Gratiot
Township.
Projections by the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments
indicate that the household growth trends have continued between
1980 and 1985, abeit at a lower rate than occurred during the
preceding decade.
For example, the SEMCOG projections suggest a
household growth rate of 6.1 percent for the Township between
1980 and 1985, and a slightly lower County growth rate of 4.6
percent for this same five-year period (see Table 10).

TABLE 10
HOUSEHOLD GROWTH TRENDS
Fort Gratiot
Township

St. Clair
County

1970 Households
1980 Households
'70-'80 Change
Percent Change

2,060
2,820
760
36.9

36,416
47,308
10,892
29.9

1985 Households
'80-'85 Change
Percent Change

2,991
171
6.1

49,497
2,189
4.6

(1) Russell, Cherly.
"Inside the Shrinking Household," American
Demographics. Volume 3, No. 9; Ithaca, New York; American
Demographics, October, 1981; pp. 28-33.

-34-

�i

l --

Consistent with National and State trends, the size of the
average household in Fort Gratiot Township declined over the
15-year period between 1970 and 1985. For example, in 1970,
the Township reported an average household size of 3.43 persons.
By 1980, this figure had declined to 3.01. Projections for
1985 suggest that household size has remained at a constant level
of 3.01.
In spite of these declines, the average household size
for Fort Gratiot remains slightly higher than similar figures for
either the County or the State (see Table 11).

TABLE 11
HOUSEHOLD SIZE

.

:

i .

I

,,

Fort Gratiot Township
St. Clair County
Michigan

1970

1980

1985

3.43
3.27
3.27

3.01
2.93
2.84

3.01
2.95

POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Projections of future population growth provide the bridge
between the present and the future in the comprehensive planning
process. These projections help dimension future land use
requirements as well as the demand for various municipal services.
Projections of future population growth need to consider the
growth of the larger geographic region within which the community
is located.
For the Township, this involves considering future
population growth within the community as it relates to growth
for St. Clair County and Southeast Michigan as a whole. The
growth of these larger geographic areas will influence population
growth in Fort Gratiot Township.
Fort Gratiot Township experienced consistently steady growth over
the past five and one-half decades. Growth patterns and trends
for the County as a whole indicate that Fort Gratiot is located
along one of the County's primary growth corridors and will
likely continue to expand in the future.
The principal challenge
for planning purposes is to determine the extent to which the
Township's population will likely increase in the succeeding years.
Three common methods of projecting future population levels were
considered:
the Constant Proportion Method, the Growth Rate Method,
and the Arithmetic Method.
Each method uses past population growth
trends as a way to guage future growth. A summary of the results
of these methods is shown in Table 12 and Figure 6. Projections
from SEMCOG are also included for comparison purposes.

-35-

�1
-

(

TABLE 12
POPULATION PROJECTION SUMMARY
Constant
Proportion

Growth
Rate

Arithmetic

SEMCOG

8,496

8,496

8,496

8,496

1990 Projection
1980-1990 Change
Percent Change

9,067
571
6.7

10,195
1,699
20.0

9,917
1,421
16.7

9,457
961
11.3

2000 Projection
1990-2000 Change
Percent Change

9,515
448
4.9

13,084
2,889
28.3

11,404
1,487
15.0

10,324
867
9.2

2010 Projection
2000-2010 Change
Percent Change

10,315
800
8.4

20,645
7,561
57.8

13,495
2,091
18.3

1980 Actual

I

'

L.

I

I.

FIGURE 6

FORT GRATIOT TOWNSHIP

r-------------------------_,
GROWTH TRENDS ANO PROJECTIONS

1s

15

15000

14
i

II

1J

(.

12
11

......
II

10

8

.c

7

► 0
:J

t
\

'

\.

.

9500

g

~

a: C
&lt; ..0
w

8496
7075

6

5588

5
4

3497

J

2
1
0 -~~~~~..QCQl~....DQQQQl:ISI...JlgQQf;;llQll,_J:11:i:11:~-t.Qii~LJjj~~~~__J
1940
1950
1960
1970
1980
1990
2000
2010
POPULATION

-36-

�1
Considering the range of possibilities offered above, the
Township will likely have a population of 9,500 persons in 1990;
12,000 by the turn-of-the century; and 15,000 by the year 2010.
These projections assume a gradual but continued increase in Fort
Gratiot's share of the County's population from 6.1 percent in
1980 to 6.4 percent in 1990; 7.7 percent in 2000; and 8.9 percent
in 2010.
It is further assumed that the size of the average Township
household will continue to decline to 2.78 persons per household
in 1990 and to 2.50 for the years 2000 and 2010. Applying these
figures to the anticipated population levels noted above yields
a total of 3,400 households in 1990, 4,800 in 2000, and 6,000
in 2010.
If the Township aggressively pursues commercial and industrial
development, it is possible that Fort Gratiot's share of the
County's projected population could increase from 6.4 percent
in 1990 to 10 percent in the year 2000, and 15 percent by the
year 2010. This would result in a Township population of 16,000
persons in the year 2000, and 25,000 persons by the year 2010.
Related to housing development, this would result in 250 to 300
new dwelling units being constructed each year over the next
two decades, or 5,900 households by the year 2000, and 9,600
households by the year 2010.
These population projections assume that the Township will
continue to play an important role in the future growth of the
Port Huron urban area. The extent to which these projections
may be realized, however, depends on a number of factors which
include the following:
•

The amount of high quality residential land that remains
available for residential development. Continued development
of shoreline areas, including both lake and riverfront
properties, may influence the influx of household into the
Township.

•

The image of Fort Gratiot Township as a place to live.

•

The expansion of employment opportunities in the Port Huron
urban area.

•

The types and varieties of housing permitted or encouraged
within the Township.

.

i '.

Barring some unforeseen circumstances, continued growth is
anticipated for the Township. The challenge for the Master Plan
is, therefore, to establish policies which provide a foundation
that allows the Township to fashion this future growth into a
balanced and functional pattern that effectively addresses the
needs of Township residents into the next century.

-37-

�ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
INTRODUCTION
Commercial and industrial needs vary substantially between
communities. The growth and development of a community's economic
base is influenced by a number of factors, including its regional
location. Other factors influencing commercial and industrial
development patterns include transportation systems, the
availability of land, and the characteristics of a community's
population.
The purpose of this study is to analyze the economic characteristics of Fort Gratiot Township and to identify its economic base.
This study seeks to dimension the Township's commercial and
industrial needs for the future, with benchmarks at the years
1990 and 2000.
COMMERCIAL AREA CONCEPTS
There are many forms of commercial development which serve
different retail needs and which have varying land use requirements. These include traditional central business districts,
planned shopping centers, and linear or frontage commercial
development.
Considering the varying land use requirements that
characterize these different types of commercial uses, it is
worth making a distinction between the two most predominant forms
of commercial development in Fort Gratiot Township:
the planned
shopping center and linear or frontage commercial development.
Shopping Centers
' .

'

A planned shopping center is defined as a group of architecturally
unified commercial establishments built on a site which is planned,
developed, owned and managed as an operating unit related in its
location, size and type of shops to the trade area that the unit
services. 1 Such centers have many advantages over strip commercial
districts which include the following:
- Functional and attractive grouping of buildings including
unified architecture and strategic groupings of tenants to
maximize merchandising and marketing.
Controlled access and exit points, frequently from several
major traffic routes.

1 McKeever, J. Ross; Griffin, Nathaniel, M.; and Spink, Frank H.,
Jr.; Shopping Center Development Handbook, Community Builders
_ Handbook Series,
(Washington D.C.:
Urban Land Institute,
1977) p.1.

-38-

�- Controlled interior circulation.
- Convenient and ample parking.
Economical and effective service areas including a separation
of service entrances and functions from customer areas.
Overflow areas for future expansion.
Opportunities to provide adequate buffering from contiguous
residential areas.
There are basically two types of commercial centers according to
functional classsification: convenience and comparison. Convenience
centers usually deal with goods and services that represent daily
consumer needs such as food, drugs, barber/beauty shops, dry
cleaners, etc •• Comparison centers, on the other hand, generally
provide a wider range of merchandise that people generally "shop
around" for before making a purchase. Examples of "comparison
shopping" establishments include apparel, furniture or applia~ce
stores, among others. Comparison centers vary in size depending on
the principal tenant and the particular trade area to be served.
The characteristics of some common convenience and comparison
commercial centers, including the trade area, supporting population,
site size, gross floor area and principal tenant, are shown in
Table 13. The information presented in this table is a synthesis
of material from several sources of shopping center data.
TABLE 1.3

SHOPPING CENTERS CLASSIFIED BY TYPE

Trade Area ( 1)

Supporting
Population (2)

Site Size
(Acres)

Gross Floor Area
(sq.ft.)

O:&gt;nvenlence

2~.3 Neighborhoods

5,000 - 10,000

.3 - 12

20,000 - 100,000

Minor
Chmparlson

Sma I I Commun Ity

20,000 - 60,000

12

20

100,000 - 200,000

Jr.Dept. Store

Intermediate
0:&gt;mparlson

Large Community

60,000 -100,000

20 - 40

200,000 - 400,000

I ntermed I ate
Dept.Store

M!IJor

Region

250,000 - up

50 - up

400,000 and up

1 Major Dept.
Store or 2 or 3
Intermed Iate
Dept. Stores

Type of Center

I

..

I

:

... _.,

~

0:&gt;mpar I son

Prlnclpal Tenant

Supermarket

~

(1) Trade Area - The area served by a shopping center Is largely dependent upon the drawing power of
the various stores Included In the center. Furthermore, this drawing power can be roughly
translated lnTo maximum travel time and distance that customers wlll drive to a specific center.
This permits the approximate physical delineation of the trade area for each type of center.
(2) Supporting Population - The minimum population of a trade area from which the center can be
expected to draw customers.

-39--

----

-

.,.

---

--

--

~

�Commercial Strips
r~-·

Unplanned shopping areas, such as commercial activity along major
thorough-fares, are positioned as a result of a multitude of
complex and frequently diametrically opposed historical forces.
Future parking, building area, and other needs are frequently
neglected because unplanned areas evolve to service the day-to-day
needs of consumers. Several features are characteristic of the
typical strip commercial district, including the following:

-

Dangerous disruption of traffic flow as a result of uncontrolled
turning and parking movements.
Frequently inadequate parking facilities.
No coordination of complementary commercial functions and
activities.
Haphazard arrangement of buildings.
Potential blighting influences, particularly on adjacent
residential neighborhoods.
Inability to make several purchases at one central location.
Poor coordination of service-related functions.

MARKET ANALYSIS
The market analysis for Fort Gratiot Township mathematically defines
the commercial needs for the Township.
It derives a statistically
reliable commercial planning base from an examination of trade area
statistics. Such an analysis, _however, is not capable of forecasting
actual retail sales. Rather, the market analysis can only predict
future market performance on an "all things being equal" basis.

. ·,

.' -

The market analysis is capable of describing the potential spending
available to a given shopping location on the basis of trade area
demand.
The willingness of consumers to actually purchase goods or
services at a given location becomes a question of consumer
motivation. Often, consumers are motivated to travel greater
distances to a newer, planned shopping center than to an older,
deteriorating commercial area or dispersed commercial establishments
located closer to home. Equally important to consumer motivation
are matters of access, traffic, parking availability and aesthetics.
The statistical market analysis provides only a numerical answer to
the question on what the Township's potential is in terms of future
retail sales. The actual sales that the community can expect to
realize are highly contingent upon the willingness of consumers to
patronize commercial establishments in the Township in light of
alternative shopping centers available to them in nearby and
surrounding communities.
In the final analysis, the Township's ability to fully capture its
economic potential becomes a question of whether ancillary programs
involving items such as access, parking, circulation and beautification will be encouraged by the coffifilunity in conjunction with
commercial development proposals.

-40-

�TRADE AREA
Marketing literature is replete with "principles" of commercial
trade area delineation.
These techniques range from Reilly's
Law of Retail Gravitation to surveys of consumer shopping habits.
Practically speaking, the term "trade area" should be considered
in the context of its inherently vague nature.
A trade area is
delineated for a given commercial area with the implication being
that the commercial area can be expected to attract, at a minimum,
a large share of its prospective customers from the outermost
geographical limits of the trade area. Other commercial areas can
also be expected to draw portions of their business from the same
trade area, with the amount left to the subject commercial areas
being termed that area's market penetration of the trade area.
Of
necessity, the trade area concept must be visualized as a dynamic
phenomenon due to changing population distributions, additional
competition, changing shopping habits, highway improvements and
other factors.
Reilly's Law of Retail Gravitation is usually applied to communities,
shopping centers, or even large metropolitan areas where there is
some distance between the competing facilities.
Simply stated,
Reilly's Law suggests that the drawing power of a commercial center
competing with Fort Gratiot Township for the consumers' dollar will
be stronger if the competing center's support population is larger
than Fort Gratiot Township, and will increase as the distance in
miles between the Township and the competing center decreases.

I

I

;

{.;

i '

Two separate trade areas have been defined for the purpose of
determining the anticipated retail trade potential for Fort Gratiot
Township:
a primary trade area, and a secondary trade area.
The
primary trade area encompasses only that area within the existing
Township limits and assumes that the market for retail goods and
services offered by existing or new businesses is confined largely
to existing Township residents. The secondary trade area encompasses
a wider geographic area and assumes that Fort Gratiot Township's
businesses have the potential to attract customers from outside of
the existing Township limits.
For both trade areas, estimates of
future commercial needs are based on the projected number of households residing in the trade area communities, their disposal income
levels and assumptions regarding how their income is spent on
different categories of goods and services.

Primary Trade Area

l'.

Based on the assumptions and methodology described above, the
estimated retail needs for the Township are noted below :
Year

Projected Commercial
Acreage Needs
63.5 acres
89.6 acres
112.0 acres

1990
2000
2010

-41-

�The land use survey of the Township revealed that approximately
100 acres of land were being used for commercial purposed in
1987. This exceeds the projected commercial demand anticipated
by the year 2000. The difference between the current quantity of _
commercially used land and the projected demand, based on the
requirements of future Township households, suggests that those
commercial establishments located along 24th Avenue are serving
a trade area that goes well beyond the boundaries of the Township
to include other portions of St. Clair County.
Secondary Trade Area

i .!

The extent of the secondary trade area was defined in the market
analysis conducted by General Growth Development Companies in
conjunction with the development of their regional mall at the
intersection of 24th Avenue and Keewahdin Road.
This trade area
includes portions of St. Clair, Lapeer, Sanilac and Huron Counties.

l

L

In determining the size of this trade area, consideration was
given to the proximity of major shopping centers in the Detroit
urbanized area, shopping alternatives in adjacent counties, and
the draw of Sarnia retail alternatives.
In addition, consideration was given to existing market capture and draw by Port Huron
retail merchants, as well as the availability and mix of existing
stores in the market. The trade area defined by this study
extends south to the City of St. Clair, west into Lapeer County,
and north into the thumb of Michigan. Counties which are included
are St. Clair (80% of the County, excluding the southern-most
portion), Sanilac (100%), Lapeer (15% on the eastern edge), and
Huron (25% on the east side). See Illustration 3.

; f

Other relevant observations made by this market study include the
following:

I

- Growth in GAF sales, $64.1 million in 1977 to $103.1 million in
1982, and general merchandise sales were even slower compared to
State -- indication of lack of retail variety in Port Huron.
i •

In 1982, Port Huron merchants captured only 67% of potential GAF
expenditures by trade area residents -- this was a drop in
capture of 11% since 1972.
- GAF sales potential for the trade area is expected to grow to
more than $213 million by 1990 -- greater capture of these sales
is expected with the addition of new retail facilities.

.....'

Port Huron has no regional shopping center, one of the few
markets its size in the U.S. without such -- Sarnia has two
centers:
255,600-square foot Sarnia Eaton Center, and
347,000-square foot Lambton Mall.

-42-

�SECONDARY TRADE AREA

I

i.

/;
i
t

I.

1l ·:
I

I

I

~

I

i •
( .

--,~AW
I

I

!

I

CANA.DA

( '
i

*

Regional Commercial Center
-43-

3

�- Despite steady population and income growth, retail sales in the
trade area have not increased as rapidly as elsewhere in the
State -- a reflection of "outshopping" by trade area residents.
Sales potentials are expected to increase through growth and
development -- projected growth indicates by 1989, the trade
area would have GAF sales potential of $213.1 million.
-

t

I.

I •
I

It is anticipated a new regional center will increase sales
capture in Port Huron by 13% over 1982 -- it is also expected
11% of potential GAF sales in Sarnia will come to the new mall.

Applying the same projection methodology to secondary trade areas
that was applied to the primary trade area, yields an anticipated
commercial need of approximately 1,000 acres. The former
projection assumes that commercial development potential in the
Township is limited exclusively to the demand generated by
Township residents.
The latter is based on the assumption that
the households in the secondary trade area will do all of their
shopping in Fort Gratiot Township. Obviously, both assumptions
reflect extremes that are neither practical nor realistic.
The
quantity of commercial needed to support both the primary and
secondary trade areas will likely fall somewhere in between.
Realistically, Fort Gratiot Township businesses are forced to
compete with establishments in other communities. The Township's
ability to capture a portion of the disposable income from the
secondary trade area is · obviously improved by its position with
the M-25 growth corridor and by the development of a regional
mall in the Township.

\

.

'.,

It .

The scale of commercial development in the Township should be
commensurate with the community's position in the region and
market demands for retail goods and services. The development
of the mall at 24th Avenue and Keewahdin Road will nearly double
the amount of commercial acreage recorded during the 1987 land
use survey.
Some ancillary or support commercial development may
be expected in the vicinity of the mall site. The quantity of
future commercial development will depend upon how much of the
secondary trade area that this commercial center and surrounding
sites will be able to capture.
INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS
The second factor that needs to be considered when evaluating the
Township's economic base involves industrial development and
employment characteristics. This analysis includes a consideration
of existing industrial establishments located in the Township, the
employment and occupational characteristics of the Township labor
force, and a consideration of future employment projections. This
analysis concludes with an examination of land use development
issues frequently associated with industrial land uses.

-44-

�INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT PATTERNS
As noted in the preceding analysis of existing land use patterns,
Fort Gratiot Township has a small industrial base. Only 100 acres
of industrially used land was identified by the survey.
A large
percentage of this land is occupied by an existing landfill.
While this landfill may be considered to be an industrial use in
terms of land use intensity, it does not share the employment
characteristics normally associated with industrial uses. Aside
from this previously identified use, the remaining industrial
development consists of small facilities located througho u t the
Township. No consolidated industrial development is evident
anywhere in Fort Gratiot Township.
RESIDENT LABOR FORCE CHARACTERISTICS
The 1980 Census of Population reported that Fort Gratiot Township
had a resident civilian labor force of 4,139 persons. Of this
total, 93.7 percent, or some 3,869 residents, reported that they
were employed.
Data from the Michigan Employment Security
Commission (July, 1988) indicates that the Township's resident
labor force has increased to 4,525 workers and that the
unemployment rate has declined to 4.5 percent from the 6.5 percent
reported by the Census Bureau in 1980. This compares favorably to
the 9.5 percent unemployment rate for St. Clair County as a whole.
The characteristics of the Township's resident labor force are
more clearly revealed through an examination of occupation and
industry of employment statistics.
Fort Gratiot Township and St. Clair County share similar
characteristics relative to the percent of the respective labor
forces that are employed in various industry categories, with
two exceptions.
A noticeably smaller percentage of the Township's
resident labor force is employed in manufacturing (23 percent)
than is noted for St. Clair County as a whole (32 percent). The
second exception involves the professional services industry.
Approximately one-quarter of the Township's labor force is
employed in this category, compared to 18 percent for the County.
See Table 14.
l

'

The Township and County also share similar occupational
characteristics, with two deviations noted.
The first deviation
involves the percent of workers employed in managerial or
professional occupations. More than one-quarter of the Township's
resident labor force is employed in these occupations, compared
to 17.8 percent for St. Clair County. The County, on the other
hand, has a greater share of its labor force employed as
operators, fabricators, precision production or related occupations
(40.9 percent) than is true for the Township (32.6 percent).
See Table 15.

-45-

�TABLE 14
l~USTRY OF EMPLOYMENT
FCRT !JtATIOT TOWNSHIP AND ST. CLAIR CX&gt;UNTY
1980

Fort Gratiot Township
Number
Agriculture, Forest:Y• Fishing
and Mining

'

-

Percent

St. Clalr County
Number

Percent

38

1.0

1,103

2. 1

Construction

201

5.2

2,887

5.6

Manufacturing
tt&gt;ndurable goods
Durable goods

885

Transportation

192

5.0

7,446

2.4

Communications/Public Utl I ltles

258

6.7

4,607

8.9

Wholesale Trade

133

3.4

1,421

2.1

Reta l I Trade

693

17.9

8,500

16.4

Finance Insurance and Real Estate

157

4. 1

2,210

4.3

Business and Repair Services

94

2.4

1,554

3.0

Personal, Entertainment, and
Recreation Services

133

3.4

1. 728

3.3

22.9
269
616

16,345
1.0

31.6
4,594
11,751

15.9

8.9
22. 7

Professional and Related Services
Health services
Educational services
Other professional services

935

Public Administration

150

3.9

1,881

3.6

3,869

100.0

51,779

100.0

Totals

Source:

24.1
276
460

199

U.S. Bureau of the Census

-46-

9,543
7. 1
11. 9
5. 1

18.4
3,492
44,338
1. 713

6.7
8.4
3.3

�TABLE 15
CX:ClPATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
FCRT GRATIOT TOWNSHIP AND ST. CLAIR COUNTY
1980

r

Fort Gratiot Townshle
Number
Percent

Managerial and Professional

1,018

Executive, administrative, managerial
Professional specialty

{.

.. ~·

Technical, Sales, Admln. Support
Technicians
Sales
Admln. Support Inc. clerical

Service
Protective Service occupations
Other service occupations

r

13,286

25.7

7,127

11.3

7.5
10.0

1,162
4,578
7,546

1.9
11.9
15.6

2.3
8.8
14.6

13.8
940
702
6,196

0.4
1.4
9.5

15
53
368

17.8
4,052
5,185

15.8

29.4

436

Fanning, Forestry, Fishing

10.5

74
461
603

Private household occupations

9,237

26.3
405
613

1,138

St. Clair Count:z:
Percent
Number

1.8
1.4
12.0

13

0.3

940

1.8

Precision Production, Craft, Repair

539

13.9

8,718

16.3

Operators, Fabricators, Laborers
Machine operators, assemblers, etc.
Transportation/material rrovlng
Handlers, cleaners, etc.

725

.1

Totals

Source:

3,869

U.S. 8.lreau of the Census

-47-

12,471

18. 7
343
206
176

99.9

24.1
7,125
3,154
2,192

8.9
5.3
4.5

51,779

13.8
6. 1
4.2

100.

�This data suggests that Fort Gratiot may be among the County's
more affluent communities. This conclusion also appears to be
supported by estimated per capita income statistics for the County.
Fort Gratiot reports the fourth highest per capita income level
in the County behind the City of St. Clair, St. Clair Township
and the City of Marysville.
It is interesting to note that the
County's highest income levels are largely concentrated in
waterfront communities. This obviously reflects the desirability
of shoreline living and the higher property values associated
with shoreline residential development.
Data available through the Bureau of the Census indicates that a
total of 818 persons were employed at locations in Fort Gratiot
Township in 1980. The distribution of these workers into various
employment categories is included in Table 16. Similar figures
for the larger Port Huron urban area are also included for
comparison purposes.
L -

TABLE 16
1980 EMPLOYMENT BY PLACE OF WORK
Fort Gratiot Townshi,E
%
Number
Urban Area
%

Port Huron
Urban Area 1
Number

%

Manufacturing
Wholesale
Retail
Other 2

43
15
407
353

5.3
1.8
49.7
43.2

0.2
0.1
1.6
1.4

8,251
526
4,404
12,184

32.9
2.1
17.5
48.5

Total

818

100.0

3.3

25,115

100.0

1

The Port Huron Urban Area, as defined by the Port Huron Urban
Area Transportation Study Committee, consists of the following
communities:
Fort Gratiot Township, Burt Township, China
Township, Clyde Township, East China Township, Kimball Township,
Marysville, Port Huron, Port Huron Township, St. Clair and
St. Clair Township.

2

This category includes the following employment categories:
agriculture, forestry, finance, real estate, mining, construction, transportation, communication, utilities, sanitary
services, education, government and public administration,
among others.

-48-

�This table reveals some important observations on the characteristics of the Township's employment base. The first item worth
noting is the absence of a manufacturing employment base.
Employment in Southesast Michigan is dominated by manufacturing
industries.
This dominance is reflected in the Port Huron urban area's
employment pattern which indicates that approximately one-third
of all workers employed in the area work in manufacturing-related
establishments.
In Fort Gratiot Township, only five (5) percent
of the community's employment base are employed in the
manufacturing sector. Fort Gratiot, on the other hand has a
much greater percentage of retail employment than is true for
the urban area as a whole (49.7 percent to 17.5 percent).
Overall, only three (3) percent of the urban area's labor force
are employed at locations in Fort Gratiot Township.

''

l .,

FUTURE EMPLOYMENT PROJECTIONS

I .,

Projections of future employment levels for Fort Gratiot Township
and other nearby communities are available from the Port Huron
Urban Area Transportation Study Committee. These projections were
developed to assist in determining future regional transporation
planning needs. These projections are reflected in Table 17.

TABLE 17
PROJECTED YEAR 2005 EMPLOYMENT
BY PLACE OF WORK

..,
I

M!llnufacturln9
Number ~

Reta I I
Number _L

Wholesale
Number _L

other
Number _L

Total
Number

...L

•

Fort Gratiot Township
Burt Townsh Ip

66

0

0.5
0
0.1
0.2
0.2
11.8
9.5
63.5
5.3
2.2

575
15
6
8
41
181
658
3,877
68

8.9
0.2
o. 1
o. 1
0.6
2.8
10.2
60. 1
10.3
1.2

~

...hl.

32 3. 1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
48 4.7
123 12.0
418 40.8
262 25.6
93
9.1
47
4.6

6,456 100. 1

1,025 100.1

China Township

80

Clyde Township
East China Township
Kimbal I Township
~rysvll le
Fbrt Huron
Fbrt Huron Township
St. Clair Township
St. Clair

30

_.lli,~

Total

12, 129 100.0

27

1,435
1,154
7,698
638
261

663

-49-

619
93

675
17
819
1, 185
1,772
8,966
1,193
360

3.7
0.6
4.1
o. 1
5.0
1.2
10.8

1,292
108
108
88

3.7
0.3
0.3
0.2
2.4
8. 1
3.6
59.2
7.8
2.2

~

856
2,849
3,038
20,954
2,756
783
1,893 ~

16,431 100.2

35,.368 100.0

.....ill.

54.6

1.3
2.2

�While these projections anticipate an increase of employment
opportunities in the Township from 818 in 1980 to 1,292 in the
year 2005, they do not suggest any change in the Township's role
as a regional employment center. According to these projections,
Fort Gratiot Township will provide only 3.7 percent of the urban
area's employment opportunities, which is nearly identical to its
1980 percentage.
'•

i

'

INDUSTRIAL PLANNING CONCEPTS

i •

(

l •

' .

L

•

I .

Promoting industrial development to supplement residential and
commercial land uses is a normal concern of those communities
interested in achieving a balanced tax base.
The physical
relationship of these uses is critical, however, as the
intermingling of industrial development with less intensive uses
can result in land use conflicts. Such conflicts should be
avoided whenever possible. Non-nuisance industries can be located
adjacent to residential areas provided that measures are taken to
mitigate any negative secondary effects that may be associated
with the uses. An attractive physical setting, including
landscaping and buffering where necessary and a separation of
industrial and residential traffic, are measures that can be used
to avoid potential compatibility problems. Nuisance types of
industries (those producing noise, smoke and dust) should have
greater insulation from residential neighborhoods. This can
often be accomplished by a transitional band of non-nuisance
industries.
Industrial areas should also be protected from
encroachment of other non-industrial types of land uses, such as
residences and commercial establishments. Encroachments of these
uses into industrial districts seriously jeopardize the overall
viability of the industrial area.
Industrial areas should be
afforded the same type of exclusive zoning that is normally
available in residential and commercial districts.
In addition to the important goal of achieving exclusive
industrial districts, specific design concepts have been
established for the physical development of planned industrial
areas. Several important industrial planning concepts are
outlined as follows:
• Buffering or insulation between industrial and non-industrial
uses. This can be achieved by a number of different techniques,
including the following:
- Greenbelts and/or obscuring walls developed on required yards.
- Major thoroughfares or railroad rights-of-way, possibly with
non-residential uses backing up to them.
- Transitional zones of less intensive uses (parks, offices,
and off-street parking areas).
• To keep congestion to a minimum, industrial districts should be
adjacent to major surface arteries or to special routes
providing convenient access to the area-wide highway network.

-50-

�• In addition to industrial buildings, industrial districts should
also provide adequate space for employee parking, truck loading
storage, warehousing, · future expansion needs and landscaping.
• Individual site features in an industrial district should be
arranged in the most efficient manner possible.
In a large
industrial district, a sound design approach is to have
alternative streets for trucks and cars. The former would be
fronted by parking facilities and the latter by loading docks.

I

'.

&gt;
i

i.__;

,...,

.

I •

I
I

l

-

i

[.

.. I

A variety of site characteristics affect the suitability of a
particular parcel for industrial development. Most manufacturers
will look at the following site characteristics in determiing
whether or not a specific parcel is suitable for industrial
purposes:
Size and Shape.
The usual preference is for a site of regular
shape and otherwise suitable from such standpoints as building
layout, access to transportation, parking, and future expansion.
Topography.
Most industries require a level site with just
enough slope to provide good drainage.
In some cases, a sloping
site may be preferred for specialized plants, such as those with
shipping and receiving on two levels.
Utilities. The utilities with which manufacturers are chiefly
concerned include electric power, water, natural gas and sewerage.
The principal difference in utility cost between sites is found
in the cost of extending the lines to the plant site.

.

'I

'

'

.

I
I

Flooding.
The possibility of flooding is always a major site
consideration. Some firms are willing to incur the risk of
occasional flooding in order to gain other site advantages.
The
customary policy, however, is to insist on a flood-free site.
Drainage and Soil Conditions.
It is important to avoid a site
that is a natural low spot. Test borings by soil engineers
should be made, as adequate drainage will have a significant
bearing on foundation conditions and site development costs.
Location Within the Community. One major factor of location is
accessibility for employees, customers and movement of goods and
raw materials.
The immediate surroundings in relation to other
land uses are also important if the industry is to avoid possible
community relation problems.
Transportation Facilities. These are highly dependent on how the
individual firm plans to ship its goods. Adequate sites must be
available that provide good access to main highways and/or retail
transportation facilities with the ability to extend rail sidings
where needed.

-51-

�r·-

' '

j

•

I

'

i

L.
I .,

II ',.
{
i

'
'

I
l ..

I'.,

I .,

l

r .

Taxes and Insurance.
Long-range stability of property tax rates
is usually as important as the current level.
Fire insurance
rates are considered in surveying both the community and the site.
Zoning and Other Legal Aspects.
Zoning is a site factor that has
often been overlooked in the past. Profiting from the experiences
of others, most firms now regard proper zoning as highly essential.
A careful check of zoning regulations is desirable for two
principal reasons:
to avoid litigation and to protect the new
plant against incompatible industrial neighbors or other land uses.
In addition to zoning, other local regulations such as building
codes, laws relating to waste disposal, smoke and fumes, and
restrictions on highway use are desirable.

CONCLUSIONS
Traditionally, Fort Gratiot Township has served as a bedroom
community for the Port Huron area, with commercial and industrial
employment concentrated elsewhere in the urban area. While this
role is, to a large extent, still applicable today, there are
trends evident that suggest that Fort Gratiot's relationship to
the remainder of the urban area and the County as a whole is
changing.
This change is most apparent relative to commercial growth
occurring within the 24th Avenue corridor. The planned development of a regional shopping mall in the Township will have a
dramatic impact on both employment and land use patterns. The
Township, therefore, has a unique opportunity to fashion future
commercial development into a pattern that is both functional,
efficient, and aesthetically pleasing.

I
l .. ,

i.

-52-

�GOALS AND OBJECTIVES

INTRODUCTION
In the broadest sense, the Master Land Use Plan is policy, a
set of goals and objectives designed to serve as a guide to
consistent and rational public and private decisions in the use
and development of land. Goals and objectives formulated by
the community are viewed as the cornerstone of the planning
process. They form the framework for public and private
decision-making.

l ,
L.Z

I

•

\

-

I

!
iI

In the broadest terms, sample choices of direction for Fort
Gratiot Township include:
1.

"Laissez-faire" approach or to permit development to take
its own course with no guiding direction.

2.

The linear city or corridor development orients all uses
along major transportation routes.

3.

The nuclear arrangement where the entire community evolves
around a multi-purpose center or number of centers.

4.

The multi-nuclei arrangement where intensive uses may be
placed at various community locations to foster that type
of use concentration.

5.

The neighborhood concept which orients residential units
around a school.

6.

A combination of the above concepts which meets the
community's needs.

'

•

It is often the defining of objectives that makes goals choice
more clear. The articulation of objectives is the more
perceivable level of detail description of the substantive
goal statement. Objectives are clarifications of the goal,
a second level of detail description. A third level of policy
planning detail which might be called "lines of action",
necessary to carry out the plan, is not within the scope of
this program.

I

-.·•

While policy formulation in practice is not as tidy and
logical as it is in theory, it is important to note that policy
decisions tend to move in sequence from the general to the
specific.

-53-

�;

;

POLICY BASIS

,M-•

Only through careful analysis of existing conditions and the
forces which have brought them about, can we understand their
interrelationship, identify their underlying purpose, anticipate
future problems and devise solutions.

I·.,

Accordingly, Fort Gratiot Township identifies its objectives by
relating them to current problems and issues and to tangible
alternative solutions; at the same time, Fort Gratiot must attempt
to anticipate future problems and recommend the objectives needed
to prevent their development or reduce their severity.
No statement of policy, however carefully and analytically
developed, will be equally relevant at all times. Movements of
people, industry and commercial activity relieve one set of
problems and leave others in their wake. When the automobile
replaced the horse, the streets became cleaner but the air dirtier.
Increases in population and income affect recreation demand and
create weekend traffic congestion in and through all nearby areas.
Changes in household composition require different needs to be
addressed by the Township.
POLICY PURPOSE

,

l

'

Administrative and legislative action by the Township Board,
quasi-judicial by the Zoning Board of Appeals, and administrative
action by the Planning Commission are sometimes criticized as
being capricious and arbitrary.
The very nature of planning
decisions makes them particularly prone to such indictments.
Clear-cut statements of policy can go far to minimize arbitrariness in planning actions:
1) They can guide and substantiate
honest, intelligent decisions;
2) They can serve the elected
officials and commissioners as an anchor of objectivity;
3) They
can be a useful tool to the citizen who finds it necessary to
remind an errant agency that it is veering from the stated course;
and 4) They can inform the public about the thinking of the
Township with regard to land development.
THE MASTER LAND USE PLAN AS POLICY
As an expression of desirable physical development, the Master
Land Use Plan is an affirmation of goals. The purposes of the
Master Land Use Plan are:

! .

1.

To improve the physical environment of the community as a
setting for human activities -- to make it more functional,
beautiful, decent, healthful, interesting, and efficient.

2.

To promote the public interest, the interest of Fort Gratiot
at large, rather than the interests of individuals or special
groups within the community.

-54-

�'

I .

'

.

!' .
i

3.

To facilitate the democratic determination and implementation
of community policies and physical development. The Plan is
primarily a policy instrument. The plan constitutes a
declaration of long-range policy and provides the basis for a
program to accomplish its goals. By placing the responsibility
for determining policies with the Planning Commission and
providing an opportunity for citizen participation, the Plan
facilitates the democratic process.

4.

To affect political and technical coordination in community
development.

5.

To inject long-range considerations into the determination of
short-range actions.

6.

To bring professional and technical knowledge to bear on the
making of administrative and legislative decisions concerning
the physical development of the community.

I.

DETERMINING POLICY

I .

i
'

The Master Plan is more than just a series of maps.
It is
foremost a series of policy statements. Policy statements, of
course, do have limitations.
They cannot cover every situation.
Certain areas are so complex that it will be impossible to know
what sort of policy decision can be made until all the facts are
assembled.
Also, there should be a relatively high degree of
agreement and consensus before a policy statement can be adopted.
Obviously, this concurrence will not always exist. None of this
negates, however, the desirability of formulating and adopting
policy statements in as many areas of planning concern as possible.

I •
t

' .

General
1.

Enhance and strengthen important gateway entry points into
the Township's core development area with landscaping and
signage that helps establish an identity and sense of place.

2.

Have gateway areas function as development "bookends" for the
Township's core develoment area.

3.

Encourage only development which can be well assimilated by
the community while preserving the Township's character,
natural features, and overall quality of life.

4.

Encourage commercial and industrial development to obtain a
greater tax base and employment center.

5.

Keep basically incompatible land uses separate.

6.

Work to keep the natural and man-made environment in balance.

-55-

�r

7.

Provide, as most appropriate, the transition of uses from
the most intensive to the least intensive.

8.

Require developers to preserve natural features including
trees as an integral part of development.

9.

Strengthen zoning regulations to better achieve the
Township's goals.

10.

Enhance the overall environment and appearance of the
Township by always giving consideration to quality of life
standards in the development process.

11.

Employ new and innovative planning tools to enhance
aesthetics in the land development process.

12.

Promote a land use pattern that considers and takes
advantage of natural features.

J

I

! _·

Residential (Low Density)
1.

Preserve and enhance the Township's predominantly low
density single-family residential development pattern.

2.

Maintain the low density character of the Township as it
currently exists.

3.

Provide housing opportunities at both ends of the housing
affordability range without compromising the existing
residential character of the Township.

4.

Encourage the provision of quality and affordable housing.

5.

Discourage strip frontage residential development along
major roads that result in the isolation of interior
acreage.

6.

Preserve transitional residential districts from untimely
intrusions and blighting influences.

7.

Prohibit intensive residential development in areas with
poor soil absorption capabilities.

8.

Require suitable and adequate buffers be established between
residential, commercial, and industrial areas to maintain
property values and physical attractiveness.

9.

Protect single-family residential areas from through-traffic
and non-related uses.

II ,
I.

!t.

1

,..
\

.

t

l' .,:

I "

I

•

-56-

�'

.

I

:

Residential (Medium Density)
1.

Provide multiple-family housing opportunities to meet
anticipated future housing demands.

2.

Recognize the relationship of demographic characteristics
to various housing types and ownership methods.

3.

Increase opportunities for medium-high density housing in
the Township.

4.

Locate future medium-high density housing development in
those areas where it will not detract from existing
residential development patterns and where adequate
infrastructure exists to support these uses.

5.

Discourage the development of high density residential
development.

6.

Encourage the development of medium-high density residential
development that offers opportunities for home ownership.

7.

Remain open to housing opportunities at higher densities and
price ranges which do not detract from the existing low
density character of the Township.

8.

Strengthen medium density development design standards as
·they relate to site layout and building design.

9.

Provide a wider range of multiple family zoning districts.

'.

'

'

!

:

I

f"'

L.1
,I ·Il

.-,

Commercial
1.

Encourage the development of a regional commercial center
in the Township at the intersection of 24th Avenue and
Keewahdin Road, and provide opportunities for second wave
growth that may accompany the location of a regional mall in
the Township.

2.

Encourage the development of complimentary regional-oriented
uses proximate to the proposed mall site.

3.

Establish well-defined limits to the spread of convenience
and general commercial uses along 24th Avenue.

4.

Consolidate future commercial development.

5.

Provide opportunities for convenience commercial uses that
are related to existing and planned residential neighborhoods.

6.

Develop more stringent site design and architectural
regulations for new commercial development.

I
\.

-57-

�Commercial (Continued)

'

i

7.

Control the access of commercial uses along major transportation routes to provide for safe and efficient traffic flow.

8.

Relate commercial facilities to transportation, parking, and
public services.

9.

Prohibit spot commercial development, except where part of
an overall development plan.

10.

Encourage commercial facilities only where there is
sufficient support population, or where there is adequate
draw from the region.

11.

Encourage the use of landscaping, setbacks, and related
controls to provide . aesthetically pleasing and safe shopping
facilities.

L,

I •

Industrial
1.

Maximize the Township's industrial development potential and
concentrate industrial uses in those areas of the Township
where these uses would not create a compatibility problem
for less intense land uses.

2.

Strive to provide some balance to the Township's tax base
by encouraging the development of a limited industrial base
without compromising the quality or desirability of the
community's residential living environment.

3.

Locate industry in areas that have the necessary infrastructure that is necessary to support these uses (water,
sewer, highway access, etc.).

4.

Encourage the development of light industrial and office/
research uses that are compatible with the Township's
existing land use pattern.

5.

Discourage the development of heavy industrial uses and
favor uses that do not result in nuisances or negative
environmental impacts.

6.

Assure that all industries shall not intrude on other uses
either physically, visually, or through other negative
external effects.

7.

Buffer industrial uses from less intensive land uses through
the use of appropriate setback standards, landscaping, and
by locating industrial uses adjacent to other intensive land
uses.

-58-

�.

\

Industrial (Continued)
8.

Promote the location of industrial uses in approved
industrial parks.

9.

Provide for the development of appropriate industrial zoning
categories and controls.

Recreation/Open Space

r··

1.

Provide public open space that offers direct access to
Lake Huron.

2.

Cooperate with adjoining communities on the delivery of
public open space opportunities.

3.

Avoid duplicating the development of public and commercial
recreation opportunities that are available in nearby
communities.

4.

Recognize and incorporate the Township's existing natural
features into the development of future recreation sites.

5.

Encourage the development of a linear, passive recreation
facility along the Black River.

6.

Enhance existing public recreation sites by expanding the
range of passive and active recreational opportunities that
are available at each site.

7.

Incorporate neighborhood level parks as desirable facilities
into future residential development.

8.

Encourage the development of non-motorized, pedestrian
linkages between existing and planned open space sites.

9.

Relate recreation programs and facilities to changing
demographic characteristics of the Township.

1

(

-

;

f'.
I
\~- -

I

I

10.

Utilize appropriate planning and zoning tools that encourage
developers to incorporate more open space in new residential
developments to be owned and maintained by private homeowner
associations.

11.

Set aside sufficient land area to meet the leisure time
recreation needs of existing and potential users.

12.

Encourage the joint development and use of park/school
facilities by the Township and school district.

-

-59-

�Recreation/Open Space (Continued)
13.

Improve access to Lake Huron through an improved Black River
canal.

14.

Encourage the development of a marina facility along the
Black River near the canal.

Community Facilities
1.

Encourage the development of a new Township Civic Center
consolidating and centralizing basic community services at
a convenient location.

2.

Design the Civic Center site so that it becomes a community
focal point contributing to the overall identity of the
Township.

3.

Encourage the development of a branch library site in the
Township •

4.

Plan development in a manner that best utilizes the
Township's utility system.

5.

Encourage large lots and on-site disposal systems where sewer
extensions are not foreseeable within the planning period.

6.

Recognize that drainage can be a problem and that a variety
of solutions are available for correcting drainage problems
(retention, pumping, gravity design, and drain deepening).

7.

Stage any sewer or water installations to provide efficient
growth and revenues to pay for the system.

8.

Extend future sewer and water service in an orderly manner,
leaving no gaps or spaces in coverage.

9.

Install sewer and water facilities only where planning and
zoning will not be compromised by their use.

:"
.. ~.

I

(

.

I

•

Transportation
1.

Encourage the development of an alternative to Lakeshore
Road/M-25 as a major north-south through-traffic corridor
serving the Lake Huron shoreline communities north of Fort
Gratiot Township.

2.

Encourage the upgrading of 24th Avenue to a boulevard crosssection with a landscaped median and controlled access, and
the upgrading of Keewahdin as a State trunkline.

-60-

�Transportation (Continued)
r '

f.

r

3.

Plan for a network of roads by type and function that will
provide a complete road system including major, secondary,
collector and local roads.

4.

Obtain necessary right-of-way dedications and reservations.

5.

Cooperate with the Michigan Department of Transportation
and the Port Huron Urban Area Transportation Study to ensure
that a proper relationship exists between planned road
improvements and the Township's desired future land use
pattern.

6.

Increase pedestrian safety by providing opportunities for
pedestrian circulation along exsting and planned road
systems.

7.

Limit points of ingress/egress on major roads.

8.

Provide a transportation system that furnishes the maximum
in convenient, safe, and economic movement of people and
goods.

9.

Provide a transportation system that recognizes the need
for both auto and truck traffic and eliminates as many
points of conflict between the two as possible.

~

10.

Improve the road system to better serve residences and
businesses.

11.

Recognize the relationship between land use patterns and
the availability and adequacy of the transportation system.

12.

Encourage the continued use of Fairway Drive as a local
collector road serving residential development between
Krafft Road and Keewahdin Road.

-61-

�LAND USE PLAN

INTRODUCTION
The use of land is both a resource and a commercial commodity
which derives its function from economic and social forces
operating nationally, regionally and within the Township.
Individual land uses and the arrangement of these uses influence
the way we live and the degree of satisfaction with our physical
surroundings. Community planning offers the opportunity to provide some rational sense of order to our man-made environment and,
therefore, enhancing the overall quality of the human experience.
The Land Use Plan for Fort Gratiot Township describes, in a
generalized manner, the most appropriate areas for various
categories of land uses including residential, commercial,
industrial and public, among others. The physical arrangement
of these uses reflects the physical, social, economic, regional .
characteristics and projections presented previously.
This data
is correlated with the Township's stated goals and objectives
for the future to derive the distribution and relationship among
various uses reflected in the Master Plan Illustration.
Fort Gratiot is located along one of St. Clair County's leading
growth corridors. This setting is currently having a major
impact on development activities within the Township and will
likely continue to influence development for years to come.
It
is in recognition of this potential that the Plan was prepared.
The urbanization of a community carries with it certain requirements that need to be addressed as part of the long-range
planning process.
Implicit in this recognition is the fact that
urban uses are neither self-sufficient nor self-sustaining.
They
depend on the provision of facilities and services by the State,
County and Township. Urban development is conditioned by the
interdependency of urban residents and their activities.
The Master Plan attempts to deal with this interdependency in a
logical and rational manner and in a way that is consistent with
accepted planning practices and principles.
RESIDENTIAL AREAS
Among Fort Gratiot's most attractive development features is the
availability of several high quality residential neighborhoods.
The Township's extensive Lake Huron and Black River shorelines
have contributed to the development of attractive homesites.
Few
remaining sites with access to either amenity exist today.
In
order for the Township to continue to be attractive for future
homeowners, new residential neighborhoods are needed.

-62-

�Maintaining and enhancing the Township's predominantly low
density single-family character is a central policy of the
Master Plan. To accomplish this, several existing land use
practices need to be overcome. These include strip frontage
development and the subsequent isolation of interior acreage
which is frequently difficult to develop.

1···,
I
I. ;:...

L•..•

I

•

i'. .
I

,_

Over 6,000 acres of land, or nearly 60 percent of the Township,
are reserved for future residential purposes. Within the area
designated for residential development, specific residential
density categories are identified. The purpose of planning areas
with varying residential densities is two-fold:
first, such
delineation of future desired density gives the Township a
locational guideline to avoid haphazard development; and second,
future density patterns within defined neighborhoods provide the
basis for determining the various community facility needs of the
area's residents. The characteristics of each of the Township's
designated residential areas are described below.
Agricultural/Rural Residential - The agricultural/rural residential category is confined to the sparsely developed northwest
section of the Township. Approximately 2,635 acres are specified
for this purpose on the Master Plan Illustration. This category
anticipates the development of single-family homes on lots
exceeding one (1) acre in total area. · The location of this
portion of the Township, outside of existing or proposed utility
service areas, suggests that a greater density would not be
appropriate, nor would it be consisent with the policy of
concentrating development in those areas where there is a
reasonable expectation that needed services will be available
to serve these uses. This portion of the Township provides
opportunities for those residents who desire a semi-rural
lifestyle. Larger lot sizes of one acre or more provide
residents with a more spacious home site, plus the opportunity
to pursue other rural pastimes on a scale that would be
appropriate in more urbanized settings. This may include
small-scale hobby farms and similar activities.
Single-Family - Infill - The single-family infill category
encompasses the predominantly developed shoreline portions of the
Township. The residential development pattern in these areas is
largely established. Remaining vacant land consists largely of
infill sites. The development of these sites should observe the
established density of nearby parcels. Much of the remaining
vacant land within this area may be characterized by physical
constraints (i.e., odd shapes, lack of frontage, etc.) that may
limit their development potential.

-63-

�\

:

In those instances, some flexibility may be needed to accommodate
future development proposals. Cluster development, planned open
space subdivisions and site condominiums served by private roads
may be appropriate in this area. Examples of these techniques
are showin in Illustration 4. Each of these examples may
represent appropriate responses to leftover parcels that may not
lend themselves to conventional platting.

1 '

f -

Single-Family - Conventional - This residential planning designation encompasses interior portions of the Township where the
future development pattern remains in more formative stage.
These areas lend themselves to more conventional single-family
subdivision development.
It is expected that densities within
this residential category will vary from somewhere between two
(2) and four (4) units per gross acre. Lot sizes will be highly
dependent on the availability of public utilities, specifically
water and sewer lines. Public roads are needed within this area
to ensure continuity of access and public safety.
Planned Unit or Cluster Housing Development - The Black River and
Lake Huron shoreline areas of Fort Gratiot Township have traditionally been among the Township's most important assets in attracting
high quality residential development to the community. For the
most part, these areas are nearly completely developed, with only
small infill parcels remaining for future development purposes.
The Township's ability to remain attraciive for continued upscale
residential home sites, similar to that which has occurred along
the shoreline areas, will depend to a large extent on providing
similar opportunities in the interior portions of the Township.

l ..

The presence of interesting and unique natural features, including
bodies of water, wetlands, woodlands and topographic changes, are
frequently used alone or in some combination as amenities around
which attractive residential neighborhoods are developed.
The
inventory portion of the Master Plan process revealed that extensive portions of the Township are occupied by both wetlands and
woodlands.
The full potential of these areas should be maximized
for future residential development. This potential may be most
fully realized through the encouragement of planned units in these
unique and sensitive areas. These planned cluster housing or zero
lot line development concepts encourage flexibility in overall
neighborhood design and provide for a mixture of density and
residential development types based on an overall comprehensive
plan for the designated area.

While these concepts may prove to be applicable to numerous sites
within the residentially planned areas, it appears to be uniquely
suited to that portion of Section 9 bounded by Lakeshore Road on
the east, Parker Road on the west, Brace Road on the north, and
Carrigan Road on the south. Much of the 530 acres of land
encompassed by this area is covered by trees. Designated wetland
areas also appear to impact portions of this acreage. Both
factors suggest that a more flexible and innovative ·development
concept may be appropriate.

-64-

�!

I

I

'~---·-·
I

1

r-·- ·
I r-·I

I
I
I

__ _J

1

r-·- ·

(__ j

'~- --,~-\

/J--- -1 - ·
ISOLATED NO IIOAD STUBS ·

I'

.

'I·

•I

I

I

-----.\
.
II
.

L.....--··7:
\
L
I ·-

1'-~
.\
.'
I
.

-t-·-r-··. ,- · · ·~-I.

•

:

I.

I

i

I

'

I

_1._L_1_j_

r-1

r-·- ·
\.....

ADJACENT 8UBDIVIIION PIIOVIDII IIOAD 8TUB

I

.

I .
l .:

PROBLEM PARCELS with
CLUSTER HOUSING SOLUTIONS
-65-

.... ,-.50•

4

�.-

;

I

'

\

Mobile Home Parks - Approximately 40 acres of land have been
included in this category, which suggests a density of
approximately seven (7) units per acre or less.
The area
designated for this category is consistent with the location of
the existing mobile home park west of 24th Avenue and south of
Keewahdin.
Multiple-Family - This remaining residential category is intended
to signify areas suitable for multiple-family housing types.
This category has an average anticipated density of ten (10)
units per acre.
A variety of different low-rise, multiple --family
dwelling types can be accommodated within this category, such as
multiplexes, townhouses and apartments.

I

'-·

, -i
i .
i •

\.

r.

rI
\..

.....

.....

I
\

Approximately 200 acres of land within the Township have been
reserved for multiple-family purposes. This represents a
three-fold increase over the current quantity of multiple-family
development and reflects a previously stated policy of increasing
opportunities for this form of development.
Consistent with previous policy statements, suitable locations
for this form of development were identified which shared one
or more of the following characteristics:
convenient access to
major roads, availability of utilities, and proximity to uses
of similar intensity.
In large part, medium high density areas
are shown flanking either side of the 24th Avenue commercial
corridor.
The placement of multiple-family units adjacent to
commercial uses provides the ability to effectively transition
to adjoining single-family neighborhoods.
COMMERCIAL
Three distinct categories of commercial uses are specified on
the Master Plan Illustration.
These include:
convenience,
regional and highway.
Each category is intended to serve the
different market needs of both local and regional consumers.
Collectively, these three categories encompass nearly 500 acres
of land.
The Master Plan indicates an increase in the quantity of
commercial land needed by the year 2000 over levels revealed
by the 1987 current land use survey results. This increase is
consistent with the Township's emerging role as a regional
commercial center for St. Clair County and communities to the
north. A description of each of the three categories of
commercial reflected on the Master Plan Illustration are
described as follows.

-66-

�Convenience - This category includes retail and service uses that
are intended to primarily meet the daily needs of adjacent residential neighborhoods. Approximately 70 acres of land have reserved
for convenience commercial purposes on the Master Plan Illustration.
For the most part, these convenience commercial areas are clustered
along the periphery of the regional commercial corridor proximate
to existing or planned residential neighborhoods.
One of the designated convenience commercial deserves careful
attention to its relationship to surrounding residential
development. This area is located on the east side of 24th Avenue
from Keewahdin Road north to Carrigan Road.
This area is characterized by a mixed land use pattern that
includes miscellaneous commercial uses of a general commercial
nature, single-family homes and vacant lots. The parcelization
pattern in this area is highly fragmented, with the 24th Avenue
frontage divided into lots that rarely have more than 120 feet of
frontage.
Many lots share a common depth of 280 feet, the rear
lot lines of which abut a neighborhood of single-family homes.

/ .
I•

I

.

I

I. .

,·

!
i

·-' -

A range of different land uses may be appropriate for this area.
These include convenience commercial, office, multiple-family or
institutional.
In considering the suitability of specific uses
for this area, attention should be directed toward the impact of
a given use on the adjoining residential neighborhood. Whenever
possible, the consolidation of parcels should be encouraged to
achieve more flexibility in the design of individual sites.
Decisions on appropriate land uses for this area should be
determined on a case-by-case basis.
Regional - Comparison commercial establishments generally provide
for a more diverse range of merchandise than may be available at
convenience locations. For the most part, these uses will likely
occur in the form of planned centers that are developed as a cluster
of common wall establishments served by consolidated driveways and
parking, as well as unified architecture and landscaping features.
Over 300 acres of land have been identified as being suitable for
comparison commercial purposes. This acreage is anchored by the
Birchwood Mall site and the K-Mart shopping center, which are
located at opposite ends of a one-mile long intense commercial
corridor along 24th Avenue between Krafft and Keewahdin Roads.
Careful attention should be directed towards achieving an
appropriate transition between the regional commercial acreage and
abutting low intensity residential uses. Transitional uses such as
offices, multiple family and some forms of convenience commercial
uses may be appropriate for areas with transitional characteristics.
This quantity of regional commercial acreage should be sufficient
to provide for both the first and second wave demand for ancillary
or spin-off regional commercial demand that may be generated by
_the mall.
If it is determined that the demand for commercial uses
exceeds the amount of land reserved for this purpose, the Township
should then consider the appropriateness of designating additional
acreage for this purpose.

-67-

�I.·

! ....

i .
l..

I

•

1 i

Highway - The highway category consists primarily of freestanding,
independent businesses that are dependent on convenient highway
access. Many of the uses that are included in this category are
oriented towards meeting the needs of automobiles and include uses
such as dealerships, service stations and related activities.
Approximately 65 acres of land at two locations along the 24th
Avenue corridor have been allocated for linear commercial purposes.
The first area is located at the south end of the corridor,
proximate to the Port Huron City limits. This is the oldest
portion of the Township's commercial district and is characterized
by many of the problems commonly associated with strip commercial
development. Over time, as redevelopment activities occur in
this area, improvements should be encouraged that result in a
more functional and visually cohesive land use pattern. Careful
attention should be directed towards updating existing development standards relating to setbacks, signs, landscaping, building
appearance and vehicular circulation. Consolidating driveways,
reducing the height and number of signs, and providing greenbelts
between the road pavement and parking lots represent examples of
specific improvements that could go a long way in improving the
appearance and function of this area.
The Township's second planned commercial site is located on the
west side of 24th Avenue, north of Keewahdin. The highway
commercial designation in this location reflects the somewhat
more intense future development pattern on adjoining land.
The
planned development of the adjacent site for light industrial
purposes, the highway exposure offered by proximity to 24th
Avenue, and the lack of single-family residential development on
nearby sites reinforce the appropriateness of this designation.
INDUSTRIAL

,!

r-l

The allocation of 260 acres of land for industrial purposes reflects
the policy of encouraging the development of a balanced economic
base for the Township. The location of this site, proximate to both
24th Avenue and Keewahdin Road, and the availability of utlities may
make this site suitable for industrial purposes. An appropriate
development pattern for this area would emphasize the development
of a planned industrial park which includes uses that are highly
compatible with one another and whose external effects are limited.
Typically, these sites would be planned, developed and managed as
an integrated facility, with emphasis given to circulation,
parking, utilities, aesthetics and performance standards.
LANDFILL
The 90-acre landfill area shown on the Master Plan largely
corresponds to the existing landfill. No expansion of this site
is encouraged by the Plan.
Improvements should be encouraged to
improve the compatibility of this site to adjoining residential
property and to the Keewahdin Road frontage.

-68-

�.
,,

LOW DENSITY BUFFER AREA
To effectively mitigate any deleterious impacts associated with
either the existing landfill or the planned industrial area, a
low density buffer area has been established around the periphery
of this area. The density of any future residential development
in this area should be limited to large parcels to minimize the
number of homes located proximate to either use.

I .

PUBLIC

,,,.

.
...,:

f .,..

f ''

L

Approximately 580 acres of .land have been reserved for public
uses on the Master Plan. The largest of these areas reserved
for public uses corresponds to the Detroit Water and Sewage
Department site, located in the northern portion of the Township
along Brace Road.
This site alone occupies 436 acres of land, or
three-quarters (3/4) the Plan's future allocation of public uses.
The remaining public uses identified on the Master Plan
Illustration consist of public school sites and Township-owned
property.
OPEN SPACE/RECREATION

r .

Several existing and proposed recreation sites are identified
on the Master Plan. These include two golf courses and several
park sites. The desirability of somehow using the Black River
floodplain for open space purposes is also reflected on the
Master Plan Illustration.
Specific ideas for the potential
development of the Township's open space resources are discussed
in more detail in the Community Facilities portion of the Plan.
In total, approximately 460 acres of land have been identified
for open space and recreation purposes.
ROADS
The Township is currently served by a network of major roads
that largely follow section lines and existing physical features,
such as the Lake Huron shoreline and the Black River. Numerous
local subdivision streets are also evident that provide access
to designated neighborhood areas. As the Township continues to
grow, additional roads will likely be developed.
For the most
part, these new roads will consist largely of collector and local
roads designed to penetrate large tracts of vacant land, thereby
facilitating the development of this acreage.
Approximately
1,580 acres of land have been allocated for this purpose.
Realistically, the quantity of land needed for this purpose will
vary from one development to another.

-69-

�TABLE 18
LAND USE PLAN
ACREAGE ALLOCATIONS

Percentage

Acres
RESIDENTIAL

!

-.

i .:

I

65.0

6,660

Agricultural/Rural Residential
Single-Family - Infill
Single-Family - Conventional
Planned Unit Development
Mobile Home Parks
Multiple-Family

25.4
16.1
16.1
4.9
0.4
2.1

2,600
1,650
1,650
500
40
220

•

COMMERCIAL
Convenience
Regional
Highway

480

4.7
70
330
80

TRANSITIONAL

0.7
3.2
0.8

30

0.3

210

2.1

90

0.9

LOW-DENSITY BUFFER AREA

200

2.0

PUBLIC

580

5.7

OPEN SPACE/RECREATION

460

4.5

1,580

14.9

INDUSTRIAL
LANDFILL

ROADS

-70-

�r
COMMUNITY FACILITIES PLAN

INTRODUCTION

Within the total development of a community, one of the most
important services is the provision of adequate community
facilities.
Often the impression created by a particular
community is directly related to its parks, libraries, schools
and public buildings.

r:
r
;

'

Community facilities are normally divided into three major
categories: neighborhood, community and regional.
Neighborhood
facilities include elementary schools, play areas, neighborhood
parks and playgrounds. The extent to which these facilities are
developed is dependent upon the needs of the particular neighborhood; however, it is desirable to plan for all of these facilities
so that the neighborhood is not left deficient in facilities at
the time of its total development. Community-wide facilities are
normally municipal offices, senior high schools, junior high
schools, libraries, fire stations, playfields and community parks.
By the very nature of their individual functions, they serve not
only the neighborhoods, but the entire community. Regional
facilities are developed to serve large areas. These areas
include two or more communities.
PROTECTIVE SERVICES
Fire Fighting Facilities
Among the most important services provided by local government is
fire protection.
Fire fighting facilities are important because
they protect residents, businesses, and industries from financial
loss and personal injury, and because they can also substantially
reduce the cost of fire insurance.
The standards contained in the
Plan should be considered as the minimum necessary to provide an
adequate level of fire protection for the Township.

t-,

Fort Gratiot Township operates a volunteer fire department that
consists of 22 part-time fire fighters and one full-time member.
The fire station is part of the Township Hall site and was
recently expanded to accommodate a newly purchased fire truck.
The Fire Department has six (6) vehicles available which consist
of one mini-pumper, one rescue vehicle, three standard pumpers
and one aerial ladder truck.
The amount of equipment available
to the Fire Department appears to be sufficient to meet future
demands.
The Township does, however, have a need for a full-time
fire chief and for additional space to house their operation.
In the event that the Township builds a new administrative
complex on another site, the existing Township Hall building
would appear to be suitable for eventual conversion to the
permanent Township Fire Station headquarters.

-71-

�The National Board of Fire Underwriters has stt wi~i@um standards
for fire protection that enable communities to get the best
possible rating.
Since this can be an ultimate savings to the
community, it is only logical to adopt these standards:
1.

The water system should be able to provide a "fire flow"
during a five (5) day maximum consumption period of ten (10)
hours.

2.

The existing system of water mains should be a minimum of
eight (8) inches in diameter to serve residential development.

3.

Fire hydrants should be within three or four hundred (300 or
400) feet of every structure and never more than six to eight
hundred (600 to 800) feet apart.

4.

A fire station should be located so that it is close to, or
leading into, a major or secondary thoroughfare.

5.

Within the primary service area of each fire station, there
should be no barriers, natural or man-made, that would delay
the effectiveness of the fire fighting equipment.

6.

The fire stations should be built and manned in such a way as
to be the most efficient for the area to be served.
In most
larger communities, they are manned by salaried employees;
however, in many areas of the country they are manned by
volunteers on an extremely well-organized basis.

TABLE 19
LOCATION STANDARDS FOR FIRE STATIONS

Fire Station
Pumper and Hose Company

Radius Served
Standard
High Value
District
Residential

Number
of Men
0n Dutz

Minimum
Land Area
Re9.uired

3/4 mi.

1 1/2 mi.

4-5

1/2 acre

Ladder Company

1 mi.

2 mi.

5-6

1/2-3/4 acre

Pumper-Ladder Company

1 mi.

8-10

1 acre

These standards possess a certain amount of flexibility which is based upon the
individual community's needs.

-72-

�Police Protection
Police protection for the Township is provided by the St. Clair
County Sheriff on a contractural basis. One officer is available
to the Township for daytime patrol Monday through Friday. Evening
and weekend police protection is provided by the county Sheriff
and the Michigan State Police as part of their regular patrols and
service.
LIBRARY
Books are but one of many services of information that a wellorganized library can provide. Generally, the library should be
located within the community in such a way that it can serve as
many of the people as conveniently as possible.
Fort Gratiot
does not operate a Township library. Library services are
available to Township residents through St. Clair County which
has a library in downtown Port Huron.
f ..

DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

I •

The Township Public Works Department is responsible for the
upkeep and maintenance of the water and sewer system and the
Township cemetery.
Seven (7) people are employed by this
Department, which is located on the south side of Keewahdin Road,
west of the Township · Hall.

'I
I

•

CIVIC CENTER

I

I

;

•

The concept of a civic center as a community focal point is not
new.
For many years, the aesthetic and economic advantages of
this locational feature has been known.
The location of a civic
center near the area of greatest use serves to strengthen the
economy of the area and brings a public awareness and economic
vitality to that area of the Township.
The benefit of a civic center can be both functional and
aesthetic.
By creating a grouping of essential buildings, such
as administrative offices, police, fire, and parking, people will
be drawn to the uses surrounding the civic center.
If properly
designed, nearby commercial enterprises will attract people from
the civic center. This will add to the economic vitality of the
community because people are placed within easy access of many of
their daily and weekly activities.
It also decreases the time
and distance residents must travel to complete their trips.
The Fort Gratiot Township Hall and administrative complex is
located at the intersection of Keewahdin Road and Pine Grove
Road.
The existing Township offices appear to be undersized to
meet the current staffing needs of the Township. Continued growth
of the Township will place further strains on this facility.

-73-

�The Township has formed a committee to explore the possibility of
developing a new Township Hall building. One area that deserves
considertion is the Township-owned site near the cemetery.
This
site is centrally located along one of the Township's major roads
and would serve as an important community focal point. The
location of a civic center in this general vicinity is reflected
on the Master Plan Illustration.
UTILITIES

l. .

I
C

Achievement of the full growth potential of a community is
directly related to the availability of capacities of public
utility systems.
As a community grows, increased demands are
placed on these systems to provide the necessary infrastructure
required for commercial, industrial and residential development.
Sanitary Sewer Facilities

'

l:

Fort Gratiot Township is one of several communities in the Port
Huron urban area that is participating in the regional sewer system.
As part of this system, the Township has a contract with the City
of Port Huron wastewater treatment facility.
In exchange for participating in the operation and maintenance of this facility, the
Township effectively reserves for itself a portion of the capacity
of this plant to serve existing and anticipated development.
Sanitary sewers are currently available to the more developed
portions of the Township. More specifically, the existing sewer
service boundaries are confined primarily to Lakeshore Road and
North River Road corridors.
The Township's proposed future sewer
service area map envisions the eventual extension of sanitary
sewers to the central portions of the community.
It appears that the Township has sufficient purchased capacity to
allow these extensions to occur if there is enough development to
justify the extensions. The development of an industrial base in
the Township could alter this situation if any fu~ure industries
are significant water users that consequently discharge large
volumes of water back into the treatment system.
In the absence
of this type of user, however, the availability of future sewer
capacity should not be considered to be a factor limiting the
Township's growth potential.

I.,

One factor that may impact the extension of sanitary sewers into
previously unserved areas involves regional utility extension
policies reflected in SEMCOG's sewer service area map.
This map
does not anticipate the widespread future sanitary sewer extensions as shown on the Township's sewer service area maps.
In an
effort to reconcile this obvious difference and to promote an
orderly growth pattern, the Township should consider the development of a community-wide sewer extension policy. Such a policy
would provide the community with a better understanding of the
costs of extending utilities into unserviced areas and the longterm financial obligations associated these extensions.
-74-

�: .

Public Water Distribution System

r.

Public water, like sanitary sewer services, are also purchased by
Fort Gratiot Township from the City of Port Huron under the terms
of a rate ordinance between the two communities. The Township
subsequently resells the water to those residents and businesses
that are tapped into the system.
Public water lines are more widely available to Township residents
than are sanitary sewers.
In addition to serving the more heavily
developed Black River and Lake Huron shoreline areas, the public
water distribution system extends into the interior portions of
the Township along Keewahdin Road, Krafft Road, Parker Road and
State Road, among others.

! .
i :

.·•
Ii. '
i .

i -

(

An ample supply of water is available to accommodate future
development. Further, existing water lines were designed large
enough to allow for subsequent growth and new taps.
Storm Drainage
With the exception of specific drains that are the responsibility
of the St. Clair County Drain Commission, all remaining storm
drainage in the Township is essentially a private matter.
Numerous
private drains are located in the Township that remain in private
hands which may receive little or no maintenance. The Township
does not have any comprehensive policy for addressing long-term
drainage concerns. As the Township continues to urbanize, this
will continue to be a problem.
In response to this concern, the
Township may wish to consider developing a community-wide storm
dr~inage master plan which describes the limitations of the
existing system and outlines a program to address these problems
including a capital improvement program to fund necessary
improvements.

.

i :
,_
r'
i

L...:

II

SCHOOLS
The entire Township is served by the Port Huron School District.
Five existing school sites are located within Fort Gratiot Township.
These include two elementary schools (T~omas Edison Elementary and
Keewahdin Elementary), one junior high school (Fort Gratiot
Intermediate) and one high school (Port Huron Northern). On a
system-wide basis, elementary school enrollment has been maximized
for the current school year and all elementary school sites are
full.
All four school sites located in Fort Gratiot Township are
currently full.
In order to assess future district space needs, the Port Huron
School District has established a Planning Committee that will be
addressing district-wide needs.
It is anticipated that the
committee will reach some conclusions regarding future school
facilities during 1990. Until such time as this committee makes
its recommendations, no future school sites are shown on the
Master Plan Illustration.

-75-

�,'

'

RECREATION PLAN
A community's overall quality of life is influenced by many
factors, not the least of which is the availability of recreation
facilities for area residents. Parks not only provide areas for
active and passive recreation activities, they also introduce
welcome open space and natural areas into an urban environment
that is frequently lacking those amenities which are essential
components of a balanced and healthy land use pattern. All too
often, however, one frequent consequence of urban development is
the loss of recreation areas to a variety of urban uses. As land
becomes more valuable for these urbanized uses, it becomes more
expensive to purchase for recreation activities.
It is, therefore,
appropriate to plan for the development of future recreational
facilities in proportion to the expansion of Fort Gratiot's other
uses, particularly residential neighborhoods.
The development of future recreation facilities needs to be related
to existing and anticipated residential neighborhoods within which
these sites will be located and whose residents they are intended
to serve.
Consideration should also be given to the availability
and location of existing recreation sites and the extent to which
these sites are capable of meeting both current and future needs.
EXISTING RECREATION FACILITIES AND PROGRAMS
Fort Gratiot Township and the Port Huron School District are the
two principal providers of recreation facilities and programs to
Township residents. The range of both recreation facilities and
programs available within the Township are described in the
following narrative.
Township Facilities and Programs

I

-

Fort Gratiot Township operates two existing park sites. The first
of these two sites is the seven-acre park located on the south
side of North River Road, west of Pine Grove Road.
This site
includes a basketball court, baseball diamond, picnic tables,
playground equipment, open play area and frontage along the Black
River shoreline.
The second park site is located on property leased by the school
district. This site abuts the Fort Gratiot Intermediate School
property to the north. This 18-acre park features four baseball
diamonds that are used for little league competition. Other
facilities and equipment available at this site include a slide,
swings, bleachers, concession stand and portable restrooms.
In addition to the two previously described park sites, the
Township also operates a part-time recreation program for Township
residents. During summer months, activities for children are
offered at both elementary school sites in the Township.

-76-

�Structured recreation programs are offered at each site which
include arts and crafts, sporting events and field trips. Other
activities sponsored by the Recreation Department include a winter
carnival held at Willow Ridge Golf Club, the Senior Olympics,
Santa Days and the sale of amusement park tickets. Many of these
programs are offered in conjunction with the Community Education
Department of the Port Huron Public School System.
I-·

These programs and activities are organized and coordinated by
one part-time Township employee.
An elected Recreation Board
oversees those programs which are funded by the Township Board.
School ·Sites

f

•,

The Port Huron School District operates four school sites in Fort
Gratiot Township. Collectively, these sites occupy nearly 100
acres of land. Numerous recreation facilities are available at
these sites. Both elementary schools include a full range of new
playground equipment, small baseball diamonds and large open play
areas. The intermediate school site includes an exercise station,
basketball court, baseball diamond, practice football field and
open play area.
Facilities available at the high school include a
baseball diamond, practice football fields and a track.

I

.' .
RECREATION NEEDS
Determining future recreation needs should consider well-defined
geographic areas that each park site is intended to serve.
Generally, a determination of recreation deficiencies considers
both neighborhood-level recreation needs as well as larger
community-wide needs.
Both levels of need and the identification
of specific neighborhood areas are considered in the following
narrative.

r

Neighborhood Unit Concept
The individual neighborhood unit is considered to be the basic
residential planning unit.
The intent of this concept is to create
self-contained residential areas, each served by an elementary
school, playground and park area. These residential areas are
typically bounded by man-made or physical boundaries, such as
roads or rivers, and are sized to accommodate the development of
an elementary school and a park to be located at the center of the
neighborhood. As they were originally conceived, these neighborhoods were intended to serve a population of between 3,000 and
5,000 persons.
[

-

Another feature of this approach was the establishment of
commercial uses on the periphery of the neighborhood.
Major roads
designed to accommodate through-traffic framed the boundaries of
each neighborhood with the intent of minimizing conflicts between
through-traffic and local traffic.
This concept is displayed
graphically in Illustration 5.

-77-

�I

'

c····

l :
l .'

I

•

'!
L.:
'

I

'

\

ca

SchoolPark

u

_,0

&gt;ca

i::,

Local

C:

0

.,u

-

(/)

0

!

I

Secondary Thoroughfare

NEIGHBORHOOD UNIT
DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT
-78-

5

�This planning concept has numerous advantages which include the
following:
1) neighborhood safety is advanced by providing
children with an opportunity to walk to neighborhood facilities
without encountering major traffic conflicts; 2) it provides
economies of scale for public and private expenditures; and 3) it
encourages stable property values.

t.,

I -·

I

l ,

Within those areas planned for future residential development in
the Township, six larger neighborhood planning areas have been
identified. These geographic areas largely correspond to the
Port Huron Urban Area Traffic Analysis Zones. Utilizing similar
planning area boundaries offers an opportunity to coordinate
Township land use planning activities with those occurring on a
broader regional basis. Within these planning areas, smaller
neighborhood-sized units have also been identified which more
closely approximate the concept described above.
These areas are
reflected in Illustration 6.
Each of these residential neighborhoods generate a need for
recreation facilities which ideally should be provided within the
boundaries of the neighborhood, or in close proximity to it.
Collectively, these neighborhoods will provide a basis for
determining the need for community-wide recreation facilities.
The purpose of the Recreation Plan is to identify future
recreation needs based on anticipated residential development
trends and the availability of existing park and schoo~ sites.
Within each of these individual neighborhood planning areas,
assumptions have been made regarding the anticipated number of
dwelling units that are likely to develop, average family size,
and the anticipated number of school-age children.
Such capacity
population estimates are subsequently correlated to the previously
defined recreation planning standards to arrive at a preliminary
determination of neighborhood level recreation needs for each
individual planning area.
As a result of this analysis, the
following capacity population estimates have been arrived at for
each neighborhood area.

(

I

TABLE 20

CAPACITY POPULATION ESTIMATE
Neighborhood
North
Central
Lakeshore

1980 Population

Capacity Population
Estimate

Pine Grove
Old Farms

1,604
440
1,168
1,011
2,936
1 325

14,900
9,300
1,900
2,500
14,500
12 200

TOTAL

8,484

55,300

Fairway

-79-

�.:
.:.
J

,....,

NORTH
.c;
_,

6

'

....... .:.:
. ... .:
:
:
:

I:•

i.

•

9

7

---··--·

. "----·--···-··..
-·········-······

CENTRAL

I .

-······················
l~e:;
. .;-::;;· 1
~
~
I
:
~

.

19

16

11-1,.....---\7

1G

·:;.

·-···-----···.:

:

.::
:.

20

I

PINE

I

1r=---~lr'--...:,-'lr-=-~~....-1-,.~~~~~
~I
' ·-

~·1

'

, .
I

NEIGHBORHOOD PLANNING AREAS
FORT GRATIOT TOWNSHIP
ST. C&amp;.AIII COUNTY , MICHIGAN

FORT GRATIOT TOWNSHIP PLANNIHG COMMISSION

raaa'!.

A

C-■■■iTT ll'lu•i-. 6 . .~••t ■t , I'! C.
- .. . - . . .
nic&amp; , •idti~•

-

-80-

6

�Recreational Standards
Several techniques are commonly used for the purpose of
determining the nature and extent of future recreation needs
in a community.
Perhaps the most traditional method of
determining recreation deficiencies and/or needs is to compare
existing park acreage and the distribution of this acreage
with accepted recreation planning standards. These standards
normally suggest optimum or ideal conditions that communities
should strive to meet in the development of park facilities
and provide a benchmark against which progress can be measured.
The risk in using these standards, however, is that they may
not be uniformly applicable to every community; and as such,
need to be evaluated in light of the unique physical, social,
and economic conditions that may characterize a specific
community.
(

.

Recreation planning standards should include acreage requirements based on anticipated population levels, the size of such
facilities, and their proposed locations.
Examples of specific
optimal recreation standards for some typical recreation
facilities are summarized below.
These standards are provided
by the National Recreation and Park Association and are based
on a 1983 study entitled Recreation Park and Open Space Standards
and Guidelines.
Neighborhood Facilities

'.

These sites are intended to be areas for intense recreational
activities such as field games, court games, crafts, playground
apparatus areas, skating and picnicking, among others. This
type of park is optimally suited to serving a neighborhood
consisting of up to 5,000 people and having a service radius
of 1/4 to¼ mile.
The desirable size of such a facility is
approximately 15 acres.
Between one and two acres of
neighborhood park land should be provided for each 1,000
persons anticipated to reside within a given neighborhood area.
Such facilities should be easily accessible to the neighborhood
they are intended to serve with consideration given to pedestrian
and bicycle safety.
This type of park may be appropriately
developed in conjunction with an elementary school.
Using a
planning standard of 1.5 acres of land per 1,000 persons, the
need for future neighborhood-level recreation sites is estimated
in Table 21. Specific needs for each designated neighborhood
planning area are discussed in more detail following the table.

-81--

-- -

�TABLE 21
NEIGHBORHOOD RECREATION NEEDS

Neighborhood

l
I

•

14,900
9,300
1,900
2,500
14,500
12,200

Projected
Needs
(Acres)
22.4
14.0
2.9
3.8
21.8
18.3

Existing
Acreage
(Acres)
40
11
48.7

Deficiency/
Surplus
+ 17.6
14.0
+ 8.1
3.8
+ 26.9
- 18.3

-

North - This is the largest and among the most sparsely settled
portions of the Township. The only noticeable area of concentrated residential is located north of Brace Road between the
Detroit Water Board property and the Lake Huron shoreline.
No
existing public recreation sites are currently available to serve
this neighborhood. The preceding analysis revealed a potential
need for slightly more than 20 acres of neighborhood park land to
serve this neighborhood at capacity development.

'.

I •

!.

'

.

North
Central
Lakeshore
Fairway
Pine Grove
Old Farms

Estimated
Capacity Pop.

;

' :

One potentially suitable park site in this area is located at the
extreme northeast corner of the Township south of Metcalf Road
between M-25 and the Lake Huron shoreline. This 40~ acre site
has approximately 500 feet of beachfront shoreline along Lake
Huron and is one of the few remaining sites along the Township's
Lake Huron shoreline that could reasonably be used for public
access and enjoyment of the lake. A conceptual plan for the
development of this site is shown in Illustration 7.
The development of a 40-acre park at this location would not
only meet the recreation needs of nearby neighborhood residents,
it could also double as a community-wide type of recreation
facility.
The location of this site at the corner of the
Township realistically precludes this park site from functioning
as a neighborhood recreation facility for the remainder of this
neighborhood planning area. Consideration should also be given
to the development of a second site in Section 9.
It is unlikely
that any additional park sites will be necessary to serve the
remainder of this neighborhood. The low density development
pattern envisioned for Sections 6, 7 and 8 would not likely
create a need for a future park site. Further, the larger lot
sizes that typically characterize this area provide sufficient
opportunities for spontaneous recreation activities, especially
for younger children, thereby fulfilling the need for recreation
space.

-82-

�~

a:
I..

C

a.

...-&gt;
z

z

C

::,
:E

..J

:E

I-

0

A.

A.

w

u u
z z
0
0
a: u
::,

---- ..

~

----

--- -·-- --- ---

--

'·

I

, I

:c

-83-

7

�Central - No existing recreation sites are available to serve
this neighborhood area. Considering the low density development
pattern planned for this area and its proximity to the existing
school and park site located at the northwest corner of Keewahdin
and State Roads, the development of neighborhood park to serve
this area is neither practical nor necessary.
Lakeshore - This neighborhood is nearly completely developed with
few remaining opportunities for new residential growth. The
recreation needs of this neighborhood are being adequately
addressed by the Keewahdin Elementary School site. This site is
centrally located to serve the neighborhood and includes a
well-developed playground area.
j

•

L_
r

'

f

T

'

Fairway - Like its counterpart to the north, this neighorhood is
also approaching capacity development. The existing development
pattern in this neighborhood may limit opportunities for the
development of a centrally located public park site. A more
appropriate approach for this neighborhood may be to encourage
the provision of open space as part of any future single-family
or multiple-family development proposals. All three of the
single-family condominium projects located to the north of Port
Huron County Club included areas reserved for open space.
Additional recreation areas could be incorporated into any future
residential areas located to the east of the golf course.
Pine Grove - Four existing recreation sites are currently located
within this neighborhood planning area. These sites should be
sufficient to meet the neighborhood recreation needs of this
neighborhood area at capacity development.
Some enhancement and
upgrading of existing equipment and facilities located at these
sites should be considered.
Old Farms - The southern portion of this neighborhood, namely
Section 30, is nearly fully developed. No existing recreation
sites are located within this area. As development continues and
moves in a northerly direction across Krafft Road, land should be
reserved for a future park site.
Community Parks
These parks are frequently areas of diverse environmental quality
and may include areas suited for intense recreational facilities
such as athletic complexes and large swimming pools. They may
also feature an area of natural quality for outdoor recreation
activities such as walking, viewing, sitting and picnicking.
Community parks are intended to serve several neighborhoods
located within a one to two mile radius and should be easily
accessible to these neighborhoods. An ideal site would occupy an
area of 25 acres or more. Plans for community parks should
consider allocating between five and eight acres of land per
1,000 persons.

-84-

�I :

Based on a planning standard of five acres of park land per 1,000
persons and an estimated capacity population of approximately
50,000, there is a theoretical need for some 250 acres of land
for community-wide recreation purposes. Realistically, however,
the need for this quantity of land for community parks will, in
all probability, not be realized in the foreseeable future.
The Master Plan envisions the development of three communitysized parks to serve the Township at capacity development.
Each site would contain some common basic park features such
as playground equipment, picnic facilities, fitness trails, etc.
Other more unique improvements would also be planned for each
site depending on the specific physical and 1ocation features
of the site.
For example, the proposed community park described
earlier along the Lake Huron shoreline in the northeast corner
of the Township would emphasize water-related recreation
activities.
A second community park is proposed in conjunction with the
development of a new civic center site in Section 20. The
inclusion of recreation improvements in conjunction with the
development of this site will further reinforce this area as an
important community anchor or focal point.

i '

A third and final community-wide recreation proposal reflected
on the Master Plan is the identification of the Black River
shoreline as a future passive recreation corridor.
More
specifically, this concept envisions the development of a pathway
along this unique open space resource · that could be used for
walking, jogging and bicycling. A more detailed analysis of this
area would need to be undertaken to more appropriately determine
the feasibility of developing such an open space corridor.

I

'

I

Other Recreation Needs
•

In addition to the specific facility needs described previously,
there may be a corresponding need to increase the range of
recreation programs being offered to Township residents. Of
specific concern is the need to address the recreation needs of
senior citizens and children. The Recreation Department also
needs a physical location from which recreation programs can be
offered. As part of the development of a new Township Hall site,
consideration should be given to providing space for the
Recreation Department.

-85-

�THOROUGHFARE PLAN

INTRODUCTION
A community's growth is influenced by the region in which it is
located. Road systems are developed to provide fast and efficient
movements of goods and people, both within and through a community.
The unpaved or graveled roads of early settlements and road alignments that were adequate for low traffic volumes become hazardous
with increased volumes of traffic.
A coordinated and improved road
system must be provided to allow a smooth and safe flow of traffic.

l

~

II

•

'

I

I_,

An important consideration in planning land development is proper
accessibility.
The automobile has reoriented land use patterns,
making the free movement of people and goods essential to the
economic and social welfare of the community. The Thoroughfare
Plan must consider the relationship between type and intensity
of land uses and resulting generation of traffic movements to
ensure orderly development and a desirable environment.
Often,
the Thoroughfare Plan will shape the urban development pattern,
improve the environment and economic efficiency of the land
uses, and result in the optimum use of the thoroughfare system.
The Land Use Plan provides an indication of future land use
locations.
The Thoroughfare Plan analyzes available data
relative to present traffic conditions and existing problem
areas in the Township and makes traffic recommendations designed
to meet the needs of the expected land use pattern for Fort
Gratiot Township as it approaches the turn of the century.

I

•

The Thoroughfare Plan is designed to provide adequate roadways
to serve future growth and development in Fort Gratiot Township.
In designing such a system, attention should be directed to
coordinating the Township's road network with those in adjacent
communities.
It must also be viewed in the regional and county
context in order to integrate the community into the larger
region of which it is a part. The Township's ability to achieve
and realize the land use pattern described previously is
dependent, to a great extent, on improvements to the existing
road system serving the community.
THOROUGHFARE CLASSIFICATION
Thoroughfare systems are grouped into a number of different
classifications for administrative, planning, and design purposes.
In the most basic classification system for design work, thoroughfares are grouped into freeway, arterial, collector, and local
road classes in urban areas. These classifications carry with

-86-

�them suggested minimum design standards. The various types of
County highways are shown in Table 22. State Trunkline System
carries relatively high volumes of traffic between State-wide
population centers and should be designed to facilitate traffic
movement while controlling land access.
A County highway system normally consists of primary and local
roads.
The primary road system provides access to higher
classification roads and connects abutting communities to nearby
areas.
A local road system consists of all Township secondary
feeder roads to the primary system, Township residential streets,
and County park drives.
The County Highway System consists of primary roads and local
roads.
The primary road system provides access to higher type
roads and connects abutting communities and nearby areas.
' -

The local road system consists of all Township secondary feeder
roads to the primary system, Township residential streets, and
County Park drives.
A functional classification of the roads might be suggested as
follows:
1.

Major arterial system providing for the through-traffic
movement between areas and across the Township, and
direct access to abutting property, subject to the
necessary control of entrances, exits, and culvert uses.

2.

Collector street system providing for traffic movement
between major arterials and local streets, and direct
access to abutting property.

3.

Local street system providing for direct access to
abutting land, and for local traffic movements.

Appropriate road right-of-way design standards are reflected in
Table 22 and in the Cross Section Standards Illustration which
follows.

-87-

�TABLE 22
SUMMARY OF STREET CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM*

Expressway
and Regional
Thoroughfares

Major and
Secondary
Thoroughfares

Collector

Local

primary
freeway: none
regional:
secondary

primary
secondary

equal
equal

secondary
primary

over 3 miles

over 1 mile

under
1 mile

under
1/2 mile

1. Land Uses

major generators
&amp; commercial
areas

secondary
generators
&amp; commercial
areas

local
areas

individual
sites

2. Rural Highways

Interstate &amp;
State primary

State primary
&amp; secondary

County
roads

none

1 mile

1/2 mile

Element

..

SERVICE FUNCTION

,!

1. Movement

·!

L

! .

I.

PRINCIPLE TRIP
LENGTH
LINKAGE

SPACING

*

Adapted from Standards in Manual of Housing/Planning &amp; Design Criteria,
Joseph DeChiara &amp; Lee Koppelman, 1975. By Community Planning &amp; Management, P.C.

L

-88-

�SECTION

CROSS

STANDARDS

i"

1------ 36 -------!

1

- - - 28
+ - - - - - - - - 6 o'
l

LOCAL

•

I

-------;

--------;

- - - - - - 50'

--------1

- - - - - - - - - - - - 86° - - - - - - - - - - ~

SUBDIVISION

COLLECTOR

+-----------59 -----------1
-------------------- 120'--------------------,
1

1 ,

SECONDARY

THOROUGHFARE

I ,

!I

,

!--------

l

*

Medium- AOT 63' *---------i

J

1------------ High -,:~:r_e_4_'_--=-*_-_-~~----_-_-_-_-~_-_-_-_-_-~_-_-_-1__________

r ,
AOT

Avero1,e

Da i ly

Traff i c .

MAJOR

THOROUGHFARE

!

!' 1'

i

I

f - - - 1 0 · - - - - 24' - - - - 1 0 ' -l

! - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 120'

------------------~

In i ti al Stage

MAJOR

THOROUGHFARE

-89-

8

�EXISTING THOROUGHFARE SYSTEM
State Routes
...-1 '
lI '
l ,

Two State-designated highways cross Fort Gratiot Township. The
first of these roads is M-25, which follows Pine Grove Avenue,
24th Avenue and Lakeshore Road. This route basically provides
the principal access in a northerly direction from Port Huron to
those communities located along the Lake Huron shoreline in the
Thumb area of the State.
The second State designated route is M-136, which follows portions
of Pine Grove Avenue and Keewahdin Road. This route provides
access across the northern portion of the County connecting with
M-19 which runs in a north-south direction.
County Roads

'i

',_

r
'

L,

The remaining roads in the Township consist of County roads.
These roads are classified as either primary, secondary or local.
Primary and secondary roads mainly follow section lines and are
largely the product of the Land Ordinance of 1785. This
ordinance divided all unsurveyed land in the Northwest Territory
into square mile sections.
The mile roads of the Township today
reflect this grid pattern.
Local streets provide access to
residential lots located in single-family subdivisions.
County primary roads are intended to carry traffic throughout the
County and adjacent counties. Each of the roads carrying this
designation are important to intra-county traffic flow.
The
following roads, or road segments, are designated as primary roads
on the St. Clair County road map:
North River Road, Brace Road,
Lakeshore (between 24th Avenue and Krafft Road, and Keewahdin
(between Lakeshore Road and Pine Grove Avenue). With the
exception of a one-mile segment of Brace Road west of State Road,
all of these roads are paved.
County secondary roads include Krafft Road, Parker Road, State
Road, Campbell Road, Brace Road, and Cole Road. Significant
portions of these roads, especially those serving the northwest
and central portions of the Township, are not paved.

I
',.
1,.
I

Right-of-Way Standards
The predominant right-of-way standard for most of the County's
primary, secondary and local roads is 66 feet.
The exception to
this rule is 24th Avenue which has a right-of-way of 120 feet.
Several other roads have variable right-of-way widths. These
include portions of Keewahdin, Pine Grove, Fairway, Lakeshore and
State. Existing right-of-way widths for these roads vary between
66 feet and 120 feet.

-90-

�Traffic Volumes

I

•

The two State-designated roads crossing the Township carry the
heaviest volumes of traffic. The highest traffic volumes are
experienced along that portion of M-25/Pine Grove Avenue as it
enters the Township from the City of Port Huron to the south.
This small road segment has average daily traffic volumes
exceeding 33,000 vehicles. Volumes decrease further north on
M-25 to approximately 13,000 vehicles per day. Traffic volumes
on M-136 (Pine Grove Avenue/Keewahdin Road) average between 4,400
and 6,400 vehicles for that segment located within the Township.
Significant traffic volumes are also noted along portions of the
major routes that intersect with these two State routes.
For
example, portions of Krafft Road to the east and west of M-25 and
M-136 have a daily volume of 10,200 and 2,600, respectively.
That portion of North River Road, between M-25 and Parker Road,
experiences daily volumes approaching 10,000 vehicles. Further
west on North River Road, the volumes decline markedly.
For
example, at Campbell Road, which is the Township's western
boundary, the average daily volumes are 2,500 vehicles.

,

.

'

'

'.

i

Among the most important transportation planning issues facing
the Township is the need to relieve the high volumes of traffic
along M-25. This road serves three principal functions:
1) to accommodate through-traffic between Port Huron and
other communities to the south to the resort communities
located along the Lake Huron shoreline north of the Township;
2) provide access to the emerging regional commercial center
along 24th Avenue; and 3) serve as the main southerly route to
Port Huron for Township residents. Observed traffic patterns
along this road suggest that it is not able to accommodate all
three roles simultaneously, and that significant improvements
are needed.
There is no one single solution to this problem. Rather, a
combination of improvements are needed to relieve this problem
and to help facilitate the Township's desired land use pattern.
Further, the scope of the existing problems is regional in
nature; therefore, any effective solution will necessitate road
improvements both within and outside the Township.
THOROUGHFARE PLAN
The Thoroughfare Plan is designed to provide adequate roadways
to serve future growth and development in Fort Gratiot Township.
In designing such a system, attention should be directed to
coordinating the Township's road network with those in adjacent
communities.
It must also be viewed in the regional and county
context in order to integrate the community into the larger
region of which it is a part.

-91-

�I·

North Street Bypass
The Township's greatest transportation need is for an additional
north-south route serving through-traffic. One alternative would
be to encourage the use of the Wadhams Road crossing, and North
Street and Keewahdin Road as a second means of access into Fort
Gratiot and to points further north. North Street is already a
paved County primary road which runs parallel to the Townshp's
western boundary. Traffic with destinations along Lake Huron
could exit I-69 at Wadhams and travel in a northerly direction on
North Street to either Keewahdin or Burtch Roads, both of which
intersect with Lakeshore/M-25 a short distance to the east.

I ,

A secondary north-south route is also needed within the Township.
State Street, which runs the full length of the Township, could
also be upgraded to help provide a secondary means of access in a
northerly direction.
Black River Bridge

(··

,-

Another partial relief value could be provided by the extension
of a second bridge crossing of the Black River.
Two possible
alignments include Strawberry Lane and Beach Street. The
proximity of a Strawberry Lane crossing to the existing
North River Road/M-25/Pine Grove intersection would only serve
to complicate what is already a difficult intersection.
Beach Street offers a better alignment and may, therefore, be
more practical.
It is unlikely, however, that a Beach Street
River crossing would significantly relieve the regional traffic
flow problems impacting the Township. Rather, it would likely
serve as a more secondary intra-community route. The cost of
providing such a crossing further limits potential for relieving
the Township's regional traffic problems.

' .. :

Keewahdin Road

I

l

The development of the mall will increase the need for an eastA portion of such a corridor
exists along Keewahdin, between Campbell Road on the west and
Pine Grove Avenue on the east. The missing link in this system
is the one and one-half mile segment of Keewahdin between Pine
Grove Avenue and 24th Avenue. Upgrading this segment to State
trunkline status should be considered. Such an improvement would
provide a better means of access to the Township development
focal point that is emerging at the M-25/Keewahdin Road intersection. Upgrading Keewahdin would effectively eliminate the
need for Pine Grove as a State-designated highway.
west corridor through the Township.

i
I
I ..

Regional thoroughfares have a planned right-of-way width of
150 feet.
This wider right-of-way width is necessary to
accommodate the higher volumes of traffic which characterize
both roads.
It is particularly important along 24th Avenue,
along which the Township's most intense development is planned.

-92-

�■
1--.

Major Thoroughfares
The major thoroughfare designation is largely reserved for those
section line roads in the more densely developed portions of the
Township and which carry higher volumes of traffic.
These roads have a planned right-of-way width of 120 feet.
Roads
and road segments carrying this designation include the following:
•
•
•
•

i '

,-(' "'i
)

i.

North River Road
24th Avenue/Lakeshore Road
State Road
Metcalf Road

Secondary Thoroughfares
Secondary thoroughfares function as principal feeder roads for
primary thoroughfares. These roads also have a planned rightof-way width of 120 feet.
While the full 120-foot width may not
be needed to accommodate the current function of the road, it
does allow for the road to be upgraded in the future as traffic
volumes increase. Roads designated as secondary thoroughfares
are primarily concentrated in the more undeveloped sections of
the Township.
Specific road segments designated as secondary
thoroughfares include the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Krafft Road
Pine Grove Avenue
Campbell Road
Cole Road
Brace Road
Carrigan Road
Parker Road

Collector Roads
In many areas of the Township, additional roads will be necessary
to carry traffic from the interior of property to the major
section line road network.
Roads designed to serve this function
are classified as collector roads. As a rule, these roads have a
right-of-way requirement of 86 feet and follow quarter-section
road alignments.

'.

Three existing roads appear to function as collector roads:
Fairway, Polina and Dykeman.
Additional collector roads will be
needed in the future to accommodate future development. The need
for one such road is evident to serve the undeveloped interior
acreage west of 24th Avenue and south of Keewahdin Road.
A road
at this location would serve to open up the interior acreage for
future commercial and residential purposes. The development of
a similar collector road on the opposite side of Keewahdin could
help promote future industrial development in this area. Other
roads will be needed to accommodate future residential development. Where such roads cannot be located on the quarter-section
alignment, alternate locations should be required and their
feasibility determined before development occurs.
-93-

�Local Roads
The remaining Township roads that do not fall into one of the
previously mentioned categories are considered local streets.
Local streets are designed to provide direct access to abutting
properties and to direct this local traffic to the higher level
thoroughfares. A 66-foot right-of-way standard is acceptable for
this classification of road. Local street systems should be
designed in a curvilinear fashion, as opposed to the traditional
gridiron arrangement which fosters area traffic volumes and
higher speeds. Curved streets discourage both of these potential
problems.
For the most part, local streets are shown only in
the existing and proposed urbanized portions of the Township.
A generalized local street system for this area has been shown
for illustration purposes.
CONCLUSION
The road network shown in the Thoroughfare Plan provides a
transportation system designed to ·meet the land use requirements
reflected in the Master Plan. As is the case with any plan,
periodic review of the highway system may be necessary.
Adjustments may need to be considered subsequent to the
completion of the updated Transportation Plan for the Port Huron
Urban Area by the Port Huron Urban Area Transportation Study.
This Plan will project traffic volumes to the year 2010 and will
provide a technical basis for determining specific road segments
which will require upgrading to meet future land use and
population demands. Preliminary results of this study indicated
that several roads within the Township exhibit capacity
deficiencies that will need to be addressed as part of future
road improvement efforts. Specific roads that require attention
include the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•

M-136, as far as State Road
M-25 (the entire length)
Krafft Road between Gratiot and Parker
North River Road from State Road to Campbell Road
Keewahdin from M-136 to Lakeshore
Lakeshore from Krafft to Keewahdin.

The road right-of-way and pavement standards suggested here
should be followed and applied to new development occurring in
the Township. For example, when subdivision plats or site plans
are presented to the appropriate local review agencies, planned
right-of-way widths should be dedicated and observed.
Sufficient
setbacks should also be observed so that additional right-of-way
requirements can be met clear of obstruction.

-94-

�METCALf

Q

RURAL RESIDENTIAL

0

SINGLE FAMILY
INFILL
COVENTIONAL
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

Q MULTIPLE

FAMILY

0

MOBILE HOME PARK
(D COMMERCIAL
C

CONVENIENCE

R

REGIONAL

H

HIGHWAY

CA RRI GAN

@ INDUSTRIAL
~

LANDFILL

@ PUBLIC

e
-

RECREATION/OPEN SPACE
MAJOR THOROUGHFARES
SECONDARY THOROUGHFARES

* FOCAL POINTS

PLAN

MASTER
TNIS IUUSTU TIOI tF THE Ju.STU Pl.Al .
T05£THEI 'II ITI DTHU IU CIIPTIV! MTEIIAL.
VAS ADO,TED IT THE OtAIT£1 TOVISHIP Of
FOil WTIOT P-..AIIII&amp; COIIII SSION
IESOLUTfOI DI JUIE U . 1990,

FORT GRATIOT TOWNSHIP
ST. CLAIR

COUNTY , MICHIGAN

FORT GRATIOT TOWNSHIP PLANNING COMMISSION

,000

zooo

Co101uNiTy

lOOO

PlANNiNG

S... - . -,, J. AQG[ftS , Utw:e

-95-

4000

&amp;

MANAGUIENT ' P. C.
UTiCA, MicitiGAN

9

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008267">
                <text>Fort-Gratiot-Charter-Twp_Master-Plan_1990</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008268">
                <text>Charter Township of Fort Gratiot Planning Commission, Fort Gratiot Charter Township, St. Clair County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008269">
                <text>1990-06</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008270">
                <text>Charter Township of Fort Gratiot Master Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008271">
                <text>The Charter Township of Fort Gratiot Master Plan was prepared by the Charter Township of Fort Gratiot Planning Commission in June 1990.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008272">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008273">
                <text>Fort Gratiot Charter Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008274">
                <text>St. Clair County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008275">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008277">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008278">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008279">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008280">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038323">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54697" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58968">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/ce546f465a84a130a87cf548957b207e.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a2b4ec253cfbd33cfb12b3cf5b3f1179</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008266">
                    <text>L
L
L

,:

. -&gt;••

··.

'.

L

R PLAN
FLAT ROCK

■

■·

■

�MASTER PLAN
City of Flat Rock
Wayne County, Michigan
r
;

Prepared by:
I
I
I ~

McKenna Associates, Incorporated
Farmington Hills, Michigan

r

I·
January, 1990

[
!

�ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

MAYOR

r-

Richard C. Jones

CITY COUNCIL
Cynthia Marion, Mayor Pro Tern
Terry Byrd
Paul Gagne
Timothy Nightingale
Sarah Jane Olbrich
Kenneth Wrobel

I

I.

\...

PLANNING COMMISSION
Dennis Mowbray, Chairman
Janet Baggett
Norvell Barnes
Lee Bobcean
Daniel Swisz
Steven Tallman
James Vajen
Terry Byrd (former member)

L

CITY STAFF
Larry Dishaw, Director of Building and Safety

1·
l_
l.

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
List of Tables

iii

List of Maps

iii

List of Figures

iii

MASTER PLAN GOALS
Introduction
POPULATION ANALYSIS
General Development Trends
Population Characteristics
Future Population Growth
Population Projections

I

!

l

1
1
8

8

9
14
17

EXISTING LAND USE
Overview
Residential Land Use
Commercial and Office Land Use
Industrial Land Use
Public and Semi-Public Uses
Transportation
Landfi 11 s
Vacant Land

24
24
24
24

REGIONAL LAND USE RELATIONSHIPS
Overview
Planning Relationships to Surrounding Communities
Additional Regional Issues

25
25
25
27

HOUSING REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
Introduction
Age and Condition of Housing
Housing Size and Density
Value of Housing
Projected Housing Demand

29
29
29

19
19
20
20

23

31

32
33

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

(Continued)
PAGE

I

l.

[

I.
I
I..

ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Existing Economic Base
Industrial Sector
Commercial/Office Sector
Market Profile
Commercial Land Needs
Commercial District Profiles
Economic Development Trends
Conclusions: Potential for Future Growth
Fiscal Impact of Economic Growth

34
34
34
34

CIRCULATION ANALYSIS
Overview
Jurisdiction of Roads
Road Classifications
Circulation System Deficiencies
Opportunities for Improvement
Pedestrian Movement

50
50
50
51
53

COMMUNITY AND RECREATION FACILITIES
City Administration and Services
Public Utilities
School Facilities
Recreation Facilities

59
59

FUTURE LAND USE
Introduction
Future Land Use Map
Single Family Residential
Mobile Home Park
Multiple Family Residential
Commercial and Office Uses
Planned Mixed Use Development
Industrial and Railroad Use
Parks and Recreation
Public Facilities
Road Network

72
72

35

36

37
39
42
44

56
58

63
64
65

73
74
76
76

77
78
79

80
81
81

ii

�.

LIST OF TABLES
1.

IL.

2.
3.

'

4.
5.

f -

i

I -

6.
7.
8.
9.
10 .
11.

12.
13.
14.

15.

!1.

16.

17.
18.

Total Population
Population Age Structure
Future Age Structure
Composition of Labor Force
Annual Household Income
Educational Attainment
Population and Household Projections
Land Use Acreage
Age of Housing
Size of Housing Units•
Value of Housing
Property Value Trends
Value of Classes of Property (1988)
Budget History
Municipal Facilities
Parks and Recreation Facilities Property Inventory
Comparison to Standards -- Recommended Parkland
Recommended Recreation Facility Standards

8

10
11
13
13

14

18
21
30
31

33
44
46

47
61
65

68
70

LIST OF MAPS

I
I_

1.

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.

i.

'.

L

Property Value History
Budget and Property Tax History

i ii
.

22
52
54
57

60
83

LIST OF FIGURES
1.
2.

!f

Existing Land Use
Functional Classification of Roads
State, County &amp; Local Road Classification
Comprehensive Circulation Pl~n
Community and Recreation Facilities
Future Land Use Map

45

48

�[

MASTER PLAN GOALS

l.
I
I

I

'

.

Introduction

This chapter sets forth goals for the Flat Rock Master Plan. These goals resulted
from discussion with the Planning Commission, City Council, and department heads.
They address the genera 1 deve 1opment of the City, 1and use, housing, the
environment, economic development, transportation, community facilities, and
recreation.
General Goals
1. Neighborhoods: Foster strong, vital neighborhoods to ensure that Flat Rock
continues to be recognized as a stable community where families and
individuals reside, work, and shop.
2. Master Physical Planning: Maintain complementary land use relationships
which promote a harmonious, attractive community; preserve natural
resources; promote a sound tax base; and provide for manageable traffic
volumes.
3. Property Maintenance: Recognize that the City and its physical resources
are dynamic, and aggressively encourage property maintenance and
reinvestment.
4. Fiscal Stability: Promote the development of a financially secure community
which can continue to provide all necessary services to its residents and
businesses in an efficient manner.
5. Land Use: Promote efficient use of the land and encourage assembly and
orderly redevelopment if appropriate land use plans are presented for:
underdeveloped areas;
areas isolated among more intensive uses; or
areas which are declining or negatively impacted by nonresidential
traffic or incompatible land uses.
6. Planning Innovation and Flexibility: Encourage innovation in land use
planning (e.g., Planned Unit Development), where innovation would:
more effectively implement the goals set forth in the Master Plan,
achieve a higher quality of development than would be possible under
conventional regulations,
result in better use of 1and in accordance with its character and
adaptability,
- 1 -

�,

.
result in development that is compatible with surrounding uses, and
produce recognizable and substantial benefits for the community.
Residential Goals
1.

Housing Balance: Strive for a housing balance that enhances the City's
image as a high quality single-family residential community, recognizing
that most of the City's residences are designed and built for single-family
homeowners with children. · Avoid concentrations of other types of housing
that would upset this desired balance.

2. Single-Family Neighborhoods: Retain single-family residential areas as
secluded and quiet neighborhoods through the promotion of safe and efficient
internal pedestrian and vehicular circulation systems, maintenance of citywide public services, and protection from nonresidential encroachment.
3. Housing Choice:

I_
I'
I

!:

Seek a balanced housing stock consisting of a range of housing types
and price ranges, and particularly encourage the development of lowdensity, high-quality, upscale single-family housing in conventional
subdivisions, for which there is an existing need.
Provide a sufficient supply of affordable housing alternatives for
elderly residents which will encourage them to remain in the community,
balancing and diversifying the population.

I

[_·

[
1·
I
I

I

I.

4. Density Relationships: High- and medium-density residential developments
should be separated from lower-density developments. Exceptions to this
policy would be .where a higher-density residential development serves as
a transition between commercial development and lower-density residential
development, or where housing of varying densities is contained within a
planned development.
5. Multiple-Family Development:
Provide for new multiple-family housing primarily as a transitional use
to separate non-residential uses from single family development.
High- and medium-density housing should be located only where there is
access to major thoroughfares, and only where it can be adequately
served by public and private services without unreasonable disruption
to the level of services enjoyed by other residents.
Future multiple-family housing should be constructed of the highest
quality materials. Buildings and other improvements should be placed
on the site with sensitivity to natural features and the need to create
a stable and secure living environment.
Maintain the quality of existing multiple-family developments through
strict enforcement of City ordinances, security, housing inspections,
and beautification promotion.
- 2 -

�•

6. Housing Maintenance: Encourage housing rehabilitation and require a high
standard of property maintenance to perpetuate a high quality of housing
among residents.

I
L. •

Economic Development
1. Economic Development Initiatives: Continue to develop and apply economic
development tools (such as formation of the DOA, tax increment financing,
tax abatements, sharing in the cost of utilities, and special assessment
districts) in a prudent and efficient fashion to enhance and maintain a
ba 1anced, heal thy mixture of business and industry, provided that such
programs are consistent with the overall development and financial goals
of the City.
2. Economic Development Incentives: Economic development incentives should
be used chiefly to promote development of light manufacturing, research
firms, and other types of development which: 1) are compatible with the
City's goals concerning protection of residential areas and the environment
and, 2) generate new employment opportunities, particularly for residents,
and 3) increase the tax base.
Commercial Development Goals
1. Central Business District: Recognize the Central Business District as the
focus of office, specialty retail activity, and housing in a mixed use
setting.
2. Telegraph Road: . Recognize that Telegraph Road north of the railroad tracks
is the center of retail activity in the City. Recognize also that Telegraph
Road north of the tracks, and particularly north of Vreeland Road is the
center of service-type businesses in Flat Rock.
3. Gateway Commerce Center: Develop the Gateway Commerce Center as a regional
convention/business center consisting of business, industry, lodging, and
other regional-oriented commercial uses. Regional commercial facilities
should be located near the freeway and isolated from .nearby residential
areas.
[

4.
.

l

Gibraltar Road: -Aside from Gateway Commerce Center, restrict future
retail development along Gibraltar Road, but permit office and professional
uses to locate along the corridor.

5. Neighborhood Commercial Districts: Restrict future commercial development
within neighborhoods, since designated commercial areas on major
thoroughfares will be able to supply the convenience shopping needs of all
residents.
6. Revitalization of Aging Convnercial Districts:
and redevelop aging business structures
deteriorating conditions and the aging cycle.

I
1. .

- 3 -

Maintain, upgrade, expand,
and sites, anticipating ·

�,--

!

7. Planned Deve1opment vs. Li near Shopping Districts: The deve 1opment of
planned multi-tenant shopping centers or office buildings should be
encouraged a1ong commerci a1 corridors, instead of unp 1anned strip
development where one use is located on each parcel. Consolidation of
individual uses on separate parcels should be encouraged.
8. Appearance: The design of commercial uses in Flat Rock should reflect
thorough and careful analysis of the site and a sincere effort to improve
the aesthetic experience.
Architecture should be clean and uncluttered, and excessively large or
garish signs should be prohibited.
Loading and storage areas should be screened, preferably with landscaped
screening or a combination or landscaping and walls.
Parking areas should be landscaped to provide visual relief to large
paved areas.
Landscaping and setbacks should generally convey a sense of spaciousness
and compatibility with the underlying natural features.
Lighting should enhance the appearance of the commercial district.
Lighting fixtures should be designed to complement the design of
adjoining buildings. Glaring high-intensity lights should not be used
in areas where pedestrian activity is desired.
9. Office Development: Provide desirable sites in the downtown area, Gateway
Commerce Center,- and along Gibraltar Road for both large and smaller scale
office uses which will enhance the City's tax base, be attractively
developed, and create employment.
Industrial Development Goals
1.

Industrial Diversity:
Continue to promote diversity in the City's
industrial base through recruitment of high-tech, research, light
manufacturing, and warehouse uses.

2.

Industrial Design Standards. Promote the location of new high technology,
research and 1ight industrial parks in attractive settings which will
coexist harmoniously with the rest of the community. Future industrial
development within planned industrial parks should be encouraged. Planned
industrial parks should include an internal circulation system, needed
supporting facilities, and adequate land use transitions to other parts of
the City.

3. Allocation of Industrial Land. Confine future industrial to designated
areas on the east side of the City, where an industrial base has already
been established. Since most industries are oriented toward metropolitan
Detroit or Toledo, industrial development on the east would minimize the
impact on the rest of the City. The only exception to this policy would be
where expansion of an existing industry in another part of the City (such
ii-

- 4 -

�,---

I

.

I

'
,-

•

1

as in proximity to Telegraph Road) would provide recognizable benefits, such
as new employment opportunities and increased tax base, but would not have
a detrimental impact on nearby residential or commercial areas or on the
natural environment.

I

4.

f":

[
["''.

Utilities and Public Services: Future industrial development should be
permitted only in accordance with the ability to provide required utilities
and public services, including public water and sewer services, adequate
road construction and maintenance, police and fire protection, and general
municipal administrative and regulatory services. The ongoing costs of
providing such services should be considered, as well as the costs related
to initial construction.

Phase out older industrial uses in the center
of the City which are incompatible with surrounding uses and the development
goals for the area.

5. Obsolete Industrial Uses:

Environmental Goals
1.
l_

Huron River: Recognize the Huron River as the most significant natural
feature in Fl at Rock. Promote development that wi 11: 1) preserve the
natural riverfront environment, and 2) maximize visual and physical access
to the river for all residents.

2. Protection of Natural Features: Promote the preservation of significant
wooded areas, wetlands, and floodplains through the review of development
plans, public acquisition of floodplain and other sensitive lands, and
utilization of environmentally sensitive areas for storm water control and
low intensity uses (such as recreation uses), recognizing a balance must be •
achieved between natural resource goals and other planning and development
goals.
3. Pollution Control:
Continue to encourage land planning, development
patterns and effluent treatment techniques which promote energy conservation
and minimize noise and pollution of the air, soil, and water.
4. Toxic Waste Sites: Work with the Department of Natural Resources and other
appropriate agencies to determine feasible uses for toxic waste sites
identified in Flat Rock.
Transportation
1.
l.

[
[:
r.
~

..

Transportation Planning: Promote transportation improvements consistent
with efficient access to community goods and services, public safety and
convenience, and consider the capability of the transportation system to
accommodate increased traffic produced by development.

2. The Need for New Roads:

Identify locations and work toward installation
of new roads where needed to make vacant land accessible for development
in accordance with the Future Land Use Plan.

- 5 -

�3. Right-of-Way Widths: Limit development within the existing or planned
rights-of-way as indicated on the Master Thoroughfare Plan. However,
recognize that it could be several years before certain rights-of-way are
acquired. Therefore, develop flexible guidelines to restrict development
within such "long-range" rights-of-way where the estimated implementation
is more than 10 to 15 years in the future.
4. Road Hierarchy: Develop a road system that provides access to all parts
of the City, yet restricts the use of neighborhood streets by trucks or
extraneous through traffic.

5. Roadway Aesthetics: Roadways should be visually pleasing to motorists,
pedestrians, and persons who view the roads from adjoining land. Frontage
along roads should be amply landscaped. The construction of boulevards or
parkways should be encouraged.
6. Pedestrian/Bicycle Transportation:
Sidewalks should be required in
conjunction with all new construction, following the standard established
in the older neighborhoods. Sidewalks should link residential areas with
schools, recreation areas, commercial districts, and other attractions
throughout the City.
Community Facilities
1. Municipal Services: Develop a system of quality municipal services which
are responsive and necessary to maintaining the attractiveness and vitality
of the City's residential, business, and industrial districts.
2. Maintenance and- Replacement:
Provide for system completion, ongoing
maintenance, and replacement programs based on a continually updated capital
improvement program for roads, street lights, sewers, water mains, and other
infrastructure elements.
Recreation Goals
1. Level of Service: Provide the maximum level of neighborhood and communityoriented recreation facilities feasible and programs to meet the needs of
all residents, within the physical and financial capabilities of the City.

r

I_

2. Multiple-Use Concept: Develop the City's recreation system in accordance
with the multiple-use concept, whereby the City's two main parks provide
a total recreation experience for the entire family. Under this concept,
each community park serves a large section of the City with facilities for
active and passive recreation, competitive sports, facilities for children
and adolescents, and picnic and nature study.
3. Neighborhood Parks: Assure that, as the City develops, adequate land is
set aside throughout the City for recreational purposes . As new residential
subdivisions are built in the outlying areas of the City, the use of Cityowned properties and school properties as neighborhood parks should be
encouraged.
- 6 -

�r--

i

r-

I~

[
[
r-·

I.~

~

•

.
4. Activities Center: Construct a multi-purpose, community-wide activities
center within the City, which would contain indoor recreation facilities,
meeting room space, and central programming offices.

5. River Access: Increase public access to the Huron River through acquisition
and enhancement of riverfront properties.
·
6. Park Design and Landscaping: Enhance the design and aesthetic quality of
all local parks, recognizing the significance of parkland to the overall
character and public image of the City.
7. Coordination with Other Agencies: Continue to cooperate with ot er public
and private organizations, such as the school district and Huron-Clinton
Metropolitan Authority, in providing recreation services and facilities to
avoid unnecessary duplication.
8. Privately-Owned Recreation Facilities:
Encourage privately owned and
commercial recreation facilities to locate in the City, provided the type
and location of such facilities is consistent with the City's recreation
goals.
9. Recreation Facilities Outside the City:
Provide expanded access to
important recreation resources outside of the City to increase recreation
opportunities for City residents.

I.
1·

1-

I

r·
[

f
[
l-:
1-

- 7 -

�POPULATION ANALYSIS
General Demographic Trends
Population growth in Flat Rock generally has followed regional trends over the
past four decades. The end of World War II initiated a housing construction
boom and subsequent population growth in Flat Rock. Steady growth in population
continued into the 1970's, when the pace of housing construction slowed and
population growth came to an abrupt halt.
As indicated in Table 1, the largest numerical increase in population was
recorded in the decade beginning in 1950, resulting in the addition of 2,765
residents, an increase of over 140 percent for the decade. The population
continued to increase by over 20 percent in each of the next two decades
beginning in 1960 and 1970, reaching a peak of 6,853. Recent population estimates
indicate that the population declined by almost five percent between 1980 and
1984.
TABLE 1
TOTAL POPULATION
I_

I
l[__

Year

Numerical Change

1,231

1940

1,467

+

236

+ 19.2%

1950

1,931

+

464

+ 31.6%

1960

4,696

+ 2,765

+ 143.2%

1970

5,643

+

947

+ 20.2%

1980

6,853

+ 1,210

+ 21.4%

1984

6,522

331

4.8%

Bureau of Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.
1984 Estimate: 1984 Population and 1983 Per Capita Income Estimates
for Counties and Incorporated Pl aces, Current Population Reports,
Local Population Estimates, Series P-26, U.S. Department of Commerce.

[

[

Percent Change

1930

Source:

[

Total

- 8 -

�Evidence indicates that residential development and population growth in Flat
Rock have been affected by two key factors: economic cycles in the Downriver area
and the availability of public utilities. According to Census data, during the
relatively strong economy in the 1970's almost 800 housing units were constructed
in Flat Rock. In contrast, during the recession in the early 1980's an average of
less than four housing units were constructed each year. In recent years, as the
regional economy gained strength, a modest increase in new housing construction
has been recorded. Population growth has been closely related to the level and
cycles of new housing construction.
The availability of public utilities has also affected new housing construction
and population growth in Flat Rock. In particular, the capacity of sanitary sewer
treatment facilities has limited new housing construction.
The recent
construction of the South Huron Valley Wastewater Treatment Plant in Brownstown
Township is expected to expand the capacity of the sanitary sewer system serving
Flat Rock, thereby creating new development opportunities.
Population trends in Fl at Rock para 11 el the trends recorded in other nearby
communities.
Brownstown Township, Huron Township, and Rockwood recorded
population growth through 1980. Census estimates reveal that the number of
residents has begun to decline in each of these communities since 1980.

Population Characteristics
A review of the age composition reveals that, as a whole, the Flat Rock population
is younger than the populations of other communities in Downriver and Wayne
County. The 1980 census indicated that the median age of residents in the north
part of the City (Tract 5990) was 30.1 years, and the median age of residents in
the south part (Tract 5991) was 26.0 years. The median age for the population as
a whole was 27.31 years.
In comparison, the median age of the entire Downriver population was 29.7 years,
and the median age of the population of Wayne County was 29.3 years. In the five
closest Downriver communities the median age ranged between 24.8 and 28.7 years.

l
ii

i__-·

I_ :

Closer review of age statistics reveals that four age groups increased in total
number and as a percent of total population between 1970 and 1980 (see Table 2)
The 20 to 34 year age group recorded the largest increase, amounting to 962
persons. An increase in the number of children under five years of age was also
recorded between 1970 and 1980. The increase in these two age categories reflects
the level of new household formation during the 1970's.
An increase in residents was al so recorded in the two oldest age categories
between 1970 and 1980. The number of residents 45 years of age or older increased
by 330 persons, an increase of 24 percent. Residents in this age group account
for about a quarter of the total population in the City.
The number of school-age children (between the ages of 5 and 19) decreased in
total number and as a percent of total population between 1970 and 1980. Whereas
this age group accounted for 35.4 percent of the total population in 1970, they
- 9 -

�~

TABLE 2

I~

POPULATION AGE STRUCTURE

r- ·
I

[
[

l·

Total
Under 5 years

1970
Percent

Total

1980
Percent

8.3%

637

9.3%

469

Change
1970-1980
+168

5 to 14 years

1,350

23.9

1,211

17.7

-139

15 to 19 years

651

11.5

606

8.8

- 45

20 to 34 years

1,034

18.3

1,996

29.1

+962

35 to 44 years

772

13.7

706

10.3

- 66

45 to 64 years

1,012

17.9

1,283

18.7

+271

355

6.3

414

6.0

+ 59

!
i' ..

65 and older
Source:

I

[_

I.

1·

l:

t_

Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

constituted only 26.5 percent of the population in 1980, reflecting a decline of
184 persons. A decrease was also recorded in the number of residents between the
ages of 35 and 44 years. The decrease in these two age groups reflects a decline
in the number of mature families with children in Flat Rock.
School enrollment figures indicate little change in the number of school-age
children since 1980. The number of children enrolled in the Flat Rock School
District has ranged between 1,538 and 1,669 in the 1980's, a variation of only
131 students. Enrollment for the 1987-88 school year is 1,659; enrollment is
expected to remain about the same for the 1988-89 school year.
Estimates prepared by the Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG)
indicate that, as a proportion of total population, the most substantial future
increases are expected in the older age categories (see Table 3). By the year
2005, residents between the ages of 45 and 64 are expected to account for 24
percent of the total population, and residents 65 years and older are expected to
account for 9.8 percent of the total population. Residents in the 20 to 34 age
group are expected to decrease in total number as a percent of total population,
from 29.1 percent in 1980 to only 20.7 percent in 2005. To summarize, the SEMCOG
estimates forecast a general aging of the population, although in-migration and
general population growth is expected to maintain the younger age groups at stable
levels.
Household Size and Composition. Broad changes in household composition have been
observed in Flat Rock in recent years. Of greatest significance is the change
in household size, from an average size of 3.6 persons in 1970 to 2.96 in 1980.
According to the SEMCOG Small Area Forecast, average household size is expected
to decrease to 2.31 persons by 2005.
- 10 -

�I.

TABLE 3

[

FUTURE AGE STRUCTURE

1-·

1980

Under 5 years

[I •.
I
I

I

L

Percent

637

9.3%

774

8.1%

Change
1980-2005

+137

5 to 14 years

1,211

17.7

1,423

15.0

+212

15 to 19 years

606

8.8

709

7.5

+103

20 to 34 years

1,996

29.1

1,968

20.7

- 28

35 to 44 years

706

10.3

1,404

14.8

+698

45 to 64 years

1,283

18.7

2,275

24.0

+992

414

6.0

930

9.8

+516

65 and older

Source:
i

Total

2005
Percent
Total

Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.
2005 Estimate:

Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Small Area
Forecast, Version 84

The decrease in household size is attributed in part to the trend among married
couples to delay or avoid having children. The aging of the population has also
affected household size. The proportion of one and two-person "empty-nester"
households composed of elderly residents has increased.
I

I__

II ,
i

I-

The type of housing constructed in Flat Rock is another determinant of household
size. Approximately half of the almost 800 housing units constructed between 1970
and 1980 were multiple-family units according to Census statistics. As the number
of multiple-family units increased, the number of rental units increased
accordingly. The 1980 Census reported 757 occupied rental units in the City, or
about 32 percent of all occupied units. Most multiple-family housing is designed
to accommodate small households. In Flat Rock, the median number of persons per
renter-occupied housing unit is about 2.1 persons.
The combination of lower birth rates, an aging population, and smaller housing
units produced the 22 percent decrease in household size between 1970 and 1980.
The decrease in household size has had a substantial impact on total population.
If not ·for the influx of residents due to new construction, the decrease in
household size between 1970 and 1980 would have resulted in a population loss of
1,015 persons.
If the SEMCOG estimates prove accurate and household size
- 11 -

�decreases to 2.31 persons by 2005, the resulting population loss may be as high
as 1,655, based on the current number of households.
Migration. The 1980 Census revealed a high rate of population migration in Flat
Rock. According to the Census, over 55 percent of the City's households had moved
in within the previous five years. In comparison, the Census reported that only
about 42 percent of the households in Wayne County as a whole had moved in within
the previous five years.
r -·

l-

I

The mobility of residents is related to several factors, including the rate of
new housing construction, upward mobility, new employment opportunities, and the
movement of empty-nester households into smaller homes. Regardless of the causes,
the mobility of residents has the effect of accelerating population change.
Population migration has had a minor impact on racial composition. In 1970, the
Census reported that only four residents out of a total population of 5,683 were
black. In 1980, the Census reported 82 black residents in the City, accounting
for 1.2 percent of the total population.
Employment and Income. The percentage increase in the size of Fl at Rock's
resident labor force was much greater than the increase in population between
1970 and 1980, suggesting that a number of households have more than one wage
earner. The total resident labor force in 1980 was 3,154 persons, an increase of
about 40 percent over the 1970 figure.

I

The increase in the size of the labor force was accompanied by substantial changes
in composition (see Table 4). The percentage of workers employed in precision
production, crafts, and repair work decreased from 28 percent to 18.2 percent.
During the same period the percentage of workers employed in managerial,
professional, technical positions increased to 21. 8 percent, and the percentage
of workers employed in sales increased to 7.8 percent. In spite of the shifts in
labor force composition, operators, fabricators, and laborers still constitute the
largest occupational category, accounting for 25.6 percent of the total resident
labor force.
On the whole, household and family income has continued to increase over the
years, resulting in a substantial increase in middle and .upper-middle income
categories. Between 1969 and 1979 the proportion of households making more than
$25,000 per year increased from 5.6 percent to almost 35 percent (see Table 5).
The proportion of residents in lower income categories decreased accordingly,
although there appears to be a core of lower income residents. In both 1970 and
1980, the Census revealed that slightly over eight percent of all households had
an annual income of less than $5,000. The percentage of households in the $5,000
to $14,999 income category decreased from over 57 percent to only about 20 percent
of all households. At any rate, the continued increase in income of most
households has widened the income gap between the most and least affluent
households over the years.

- 12 -

�I

TABLE 4
COMPOSITION OF LABOR FORCE

Occu12ation

Number

Managerial, professional, technical
Sales

1970

1980

Percent

Number

382

17.7%

590

21.8%

109

5.0

211

7.8

!.

Administrative support

300

13.9

385

4.3

f

Service

235

10.8

304

11.3

Precision production, craft, repair
Operators, fabricators, l_aborers

605

28.0

491

18.2

529

24 . 4

690

25.6

4

0.2

28

1.0

1-1

Other

I

TOTAL
Source:

2,164

Percent

2,699

Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce.

TABLE 5
ANNUAL HOUSEHOLD INCOME

Wayne
Count~

Flat Rock
Number
f,

Percent

Number

1979

1979

Percent

Percent

8.4%

14.5%

Less than $5,000

116

$ 5,000 to $14,999

815

57 . 1

462

19.7

26.5

$15,000 to $24,999

415

29.1

653

27.8

24.3

$25,000 to $49,999

76

5.3

940

40.1

29.6

5

0.3

93

4.0
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.

5.1

I

I .·

1969

$50,000 or more
Source:

8.1%

- 13 -

198

�l

.

Education. The educational status of Flat Rock residents substantially improved
between 1970 and 1980, according to the Census (see Table 6}. The percentage of
residents over the age of 25 who completed high school increased from just 56.2
percent in 1970 to 73.2 percent in 1980. Based on high school completion, the
educational attainment of Flat Rock residents exceeds that of residents in the
County as a whole or the region.
TABLE 6
EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT
(Residents Over 25 Years of Age}

Wayne
County

Flat Rocle
Years of
School Completed

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

Percent

Elementary School

2,401

86.1%

3,552

95.7%

89.6%

High School

1,567

56.2

2,715

73.2

61.4

397
167

14.2
6.0

1,015
406

27.3

26.1

10.9

11.1

College
1 to 3 years
4 years
Source:

1970

1980

1980

U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census.

Residents of Flat Rock also improved their college-level educational status in
recent years. The percentage of residents who completed one to three years of
college education increased from 14.2 percent in 1970 to 27.3 percent in 1980.
The 1980 Census further reported that 10.9 percent of Flat Rock residents had
completed four years of college. In comparison, 11.1 percent of all residents
in Wayne County had completed four years of college.

l
I[_

Future Population Growth
The level of growth of Flat Rock's population will be determined chiefly by four
sets of variables:
1. Physical Parameters.
Several physical variables will affect future
population growth in Flat Rock, including the amount of vacant land available
for residential development, the zoning restrictions placed on such land, the
capacity of the sanitary sewer system, and the type of housing that is
constructed in the future.

- 14 -

�~

1-

I

[

l

"
•

2. Regional Economy. The economic health of the region is the most significant
external variable that affects population growth in all Detroit metropolitan
communities. ·
3. Characteristics of the Existing Population. Characteristics of the
population, such as the age structure and propensity to move will affect
population growth in Flat Rock.
4. Preferences of Residents. Existing and prospective residents' preferences
in terms of a living environment will have an impact on population growth.
The type and affordability of housing, characteristics of the environment,
and availability of public facilities and services affect people's desire
to live in a community.
Each of these sets of vari ab 1es are discussed in detail in the fo 11 owing
paragraphs.
Physical Parameters.
Vacant land area on which new housing units can be
constructed is a key variable that determines the absolute maximum population,
or holding capacity, of the City. An existing land use survey completed by SEMCOG
in 1980 indicated that 1,150 acres of vacant developable land remains in the City.
In addition, there are 1,726 acres of land used for agricultural purposes. A
comparison between the existing land use and future land use maps reveals that
approximately 850 acres of the vacant land are designated for single-family
development, and approximately 300 acres are designated for multiple-family
development.

Currently, there are 2,369 housing units which occupy 631 acres of residential
land in Flat Rock. Therefore, on the average, each housing unit occupies 11,602
square feet of land. If the remaining single-family acreage is developed at the
same density as existing residential development, then another 3,191 single-family
units could be built in the City. It is likely that multiple-family development
will occur at a higher density. At a relatively low density of eight multiplefamily units per acre, a total of 2,400 additional multiple-family units could be
constructed of the remaining vacant land.

I

Based on an average of 2. 96 persons per househo 1d from the 1980 Census, the
maximum population of Flat Rock if all residential lands are eventually developed
is calculated to be about 23,400 persons. This estimate does not account for
possible rezoning of single-family residential land to permit higher density
development. Such rezoning would increase the holding capacity of the City.
Equally important, these estimates do not take into account the capacity of the
sanitary sewer system.
This is a major physical parameter that could
substantially reduce the City's holding capacity.
Regional Economy. The regional economy is largely beyond the control of the City
and its individual residents, but it has a tremendous impact on population growth.
The general state of the economy and regional patterns of growth and development
are related external variables that work in conjunction to affect population
growth.

- 15 -

�f""

I

Cycles in the economy have been cited as one of the key determinants of population
change in Michigan, because of the effect of the economy on migration patterns.
In general, a lackluster economy results in a reduction in the number of families
that purchase new homes or relocate. Thus, a poor economy tends to preserve the
status quo or, as observed in certain Downriver communities in recent years, may
result in a reduction in population.
During times when the economy is strong, regional patterns of growth determine
the population growth of individual communities. Although most analysts believe
that the regional center of growth and development is farther to the north in
metropolitan Detroit, the Downriver economy has grown substantially stronger since
1984. Recent newspaper reports have documented a "new surge in residential
development tied chiefly to the economic revival." 1 Demand fueled by the Mazda
plant plus $1.7 billion invested in other major industrial developments in
Downriver in recent years are cited as key reasons for the upswing in new housing
construction. If the economy continues to rebound, it is likely that Flat Rock
will eventually experience demand for new housing, provided that public utilities
have the capacity to serve such development.
Characteristics of the Population. The earlier review of SEMCOG forecasts
revealed that the number of mature households is projected to increase over the
next twenty years.
However, in-migration and general population growth is
expected to maintain the younger age groups at stable levels.
The increase in residents over the age of 45 portends smaller household size,
which is an important consideration with regards to future population growth.
A fr act i ona 1 increase or decrease in househo 1d size can make a difference of
hundreds in total population. SEMCOG projections for the year 2005 call for an
average household size of 2.31 persons in Flat Rock, compared to an average size
of 2.96 persons in 1980. As noted earlier, if the SEMCOG projections prove
accurate, the effect of household size alone could range between 1,655 and 2,270
persons by the year 2005 depending on the total number of households.

I.

Residents' Preferences and Perceptions. Variables related to people's preferences
in terms of housing and the environment in which they live will affect population
growth.
Residents have been drawn to Fl at Rock by a variety of features,
including the availability of nearby employment, the character of the community,
well-maintained public facilities, proximity to the Lake Erie and other recreation
opportunities, and the convenience of being located along 1-75.

L

The ability of the City to maintain these qualities will affect the stability of
neighborhoods, and accordingly, the growth in population. Maintaining quality
housing, good public services, and other qualities of the community becomes
increasingly difficult as neighborhoods and housing ages. Continued investment
in maintenance and replacement by the City and individual property owners will be
required.

[
1

Jack A. Seamonds, "Downriver ripples with new housing plans," The Detroit
Free Press, March 20, 1987, sec. J, p. 1.
- 16 -

f ..

L

�I

I

.

l. .
'

[

.
People's preferences in terms of type of housing will also affect future
population growth. Single-family detached housing is predominant in Flat Rock
at the present time. However, the successful development of multiple-family
housing in the 1970's revealed a latent demand for a greater variety of housing
types.
The construction of additional multiple-family housing would increase the total
number of housing units that could be built in the City. However, as noted
earlier, households occupying multiple-family homes are typically much smaller
than those occupying single-family homes.

Population Projections
Current population statistics indicate that the rate of population growth in Flat
Rock has levelled off.
According to Bureau of the Census estimates, the
population may have actually declined between 1980 and 1984. The information
presented on the previous pages reveals a number of events that could generate
add it ion al population growth in future years. These events include continued
growth of the local economy and increased capacity of the sanitary sewer system.
It is not likely that large scale housing development will occur in Flat Rock in
the near future. In spite of the successful economic development initiatives
taken in recent years, statistics reveal that the overall direction of growth in
the region is not toward the Downriver area. While many communities in Oakland,
Macomb, and Washtenaw Counties have gained population in recent years, 1984 Census
estimates reveal that all except two Downriver communities lost population since
the 1980 Census. It would be reasonable to expect that recent economic development
initiatives will sustain a modest level of population growth in Downriver.
The most precise population projections for Flat Rock and other communities in
the region have been prepared by SEMCOG as a part of its Version 84 Small Area
Forecast. The small area forecast is based on local land use plans and policies,
modified to account for sewer service, protection of environmentally sensitive
lands, planned transportation improvements, and similar considerations.
The SEMCOG projections indicate a 38.4 percent increase resulting in a total
population of 9,486 for Flat Rock by the year 2005 (see Table 7). This increase
is projected even though the number of persons per househo 1d is expected to
decline from 2.96 to 2.31. Thus, the net increase of 2,633 residents must be
attributed to the projected increase of 1,792 households.
Review of these projections reveals the importance of accurate estimates of
household size. If household size were to remain steady instead of decrease,
the population could exceed 12,000 persons by the year 2005, assuming that the
number of households increases as projected.
The SEMCOG estimates are based on a healthier rate of growth than in the recent
past. Between 1970 and 1980, an average of 77. 8 housing uni ts per year were
constructed in Flat Rock. The pace of construction slowed to about 3.4 units
per year in the 1980's. Over the 18-year period beginning in 1970 an average of

[
L.

- 17 -

�r

·-

l.

.

44.7 housing units per year were constructed each year. In contrast, the SEMCOG
estimates call for construction of an average of 86.8 units per year over the next
twenty years.
TABLE 7
POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD PROJECTIONS

Percent Change
1980 - 2005

1980

1990

2005

Population

6,853

7,661

9,486

+38.4%

Households

2,314

2,731

4,106

+77 .4

2.96

2.81

2.31

-22.0

Persons per Household

Source: Southeast Michigan Council of Governments Small Area Forecast Version 84.

[

- 18 -

�EXISTING LAND USE
Overview

[.

l.

I' ·

Early development in Flat Rock was oriented in relation to three primary
transportation axes: Telegraph Road, Gibraltar Road, and Huron River Drive. At one
time, Telegraph Road (US-24) was the major north-south transportation route in
southeast Michigan, linking Detroit and communities farther to the north with
Toledo. The heavy volume of traffic on Telegraph Road provided a healthy market
for an assortment of retail and services businesses that were developed in a
random pattern along the corridor.
In Flat Rock, Telegraph Road near the Huron River became the "main street" of the
central business district (CBD). The CBD eventually expanded to encompass about
12 to 15 blocks, generally east of Telegraph Road. Telegraph Road consisted of
primarily retail uses, whereas the rest of the CBD contained a mixture of service,
institutional and residential uses. Some of the oldest housing in the City is
interspersed with the commercial and inst itut i ona 1 uses in the CBD. A sma 11
neighborhood of older single family homes also exists adjacent to and east of the
CBD.
Patterns of additional early residential growth were prescribed by the other two
primary axes noted above, Gibraltar Road and Huron River Drive. The largest single
family neighborhood in the City developed in a large triangular area bounded by
Gibraltar Road on the north and Huron River Drive on the south. Huron River Drive
was developed by residents who desired more substantial custom-built homes on
large lots in a semi-rural setting.
A second concentration of early residential growth occurred northwest of the CBD
along Huron River Drive. In addition to the large lot development facing onto
Huron River Drive, a small riverfront subdivision was developed north of the CBD.
A fourth major transportation axis -- the railroad -- also affected the early
development and general form of the City. The general pattern of commercial and
residential development was split diagonally by the railroad line, demarcating the
north boundary of the CBD. The northwest part of the City developed at a slower
rate than the rest of the City, possibly because the tracks "cut off" the
northwest from the businesses and institutions in and near the CBD.

:

I...

r

I

The basic pattern of development described in the previous paragraphs was in place
in 1970, when the previous master plan was completed. In more recent times, the
development of the City has been affected most significantly by access to I-75 ,
the major north-south corridor in Michigan and the United States. The Gibraltar
Road interchange created opportunities for regional-oriented development on the
east side of the City. Mazda is the most prominent example of such development.
Concurrently, Telegraph Road's role as a regional transportation corridor
declined. Accordingly, much of the recent commercial development along Telegraph
Road has been oriented toward a local market, rather than toward travellers. Some
o1der businesses have become obsolete because of the reori en tat ion of the
Telegraph Road market.
- 19 -

,.
L

�,.

Aside from the I-75 access and reorientation of the Telegraph Road commercial
district, in recent years Flat Rock's land use profile has changed because of the
construction of new types of housing. The City's predominantly single family
housing stock has been diversified with the construction of mobiles homes and
apartments during the 1970's.
Although the City recorded a few major developments in the 1970's and 1980's,
almost half of the land in Flat Rock remains vacant. Thus, the opportunity still
exists to shape the City to the form desired by residents and community leaders.
A more detailed review of each type of land use follows.

Residential Land Use
The amount of land used for residential purposes increased by about 130 acres, or
about 21 percent, between 1970 and 1988 {see Map 1 and Table 8). Currently,
about 754 acres, or approximately 17.5 percent of the total land area, is used for
residential purposes.
Much recent residential development has consisted of multiple family and mobile
home construction. Multiple family complexes occupy over fifty acres of land,
most of which is on the south side of Gibraltar Road, west of Cahill Road. The
huge Deerfield Estates mobile home park occupies over 120 acres of land east of
Telegraph Road, at the northern entrance to the City.

I_

The most recent large scale single family development occurred in the southeast
part of the City off of Olmstead Road, where a 280-lot subdivision was constructed
in the 1970's. Scattered large lot single family development also occurred
recently along various roads, such as Huron River Drive, Arsenal Road, and Cahill
Road.
The continued development of scattered large lot single family homes indicates the
demand for such housing still exists. Development of single family subdivisions
has been hindered because of, among other reasons, the lack of sewer capacity and
insufficient access to vacant lands. Three broad areas are suitable for single
family development but are not currently accessible via public. road: in the center
of the City, north of Gibraltar Road; in the southcentral part of the City; and,
in the northwest corner of the City.

Commercial and Office Land Use
The amount of land allocated for commercial and office use increased by over 50
acres between 1970 and 1988, an increase of almost 82 percent. The 1988 land
use survey revealed that about 112 acres of land are currently used for commercial
purposes.

- 20 -

�I • •

TABLE 8
LAND USE ACREAGE

Acres

1970

Change 1970-1988
Acres
Percent

Acres

623.7

14.7

754.0
580.3
51.8
122.0

17.5
13.5
1.2
2.8

+130.3

+ 20.9

Commercial
Retail
Office

61.4

1.4

111.7108.9
2.8

2.7
2.6
0.1

+ 50.3

+ 81.9

Industrial

56.0

1.2

410.3

9.6

+354.3

+632.7

Public and Semi-Public
Schools, Municipal
Buildings, Religious
Institutions
Parks and Recreation
Utilities

256.0

6.0

207.8

4.8

- 48.2

- 18 . 8

153.9
52.2
1.8

3.6
1.2
0.04

Transportation
Street Rights-of-Way
Railroad

482.1

11.3

530.1
323.5
206.6

- 48.0

-10.0

2,789.7

65.4

2,110.2

-679.7

-24.4

Residential
Single Family
Multiple Family
Mobile Home Park

Vacant
Landfi 11 s
.

1988
Percent

Percent

Sources:

163.8

12.3
7.5
4.8
49.3

3.8

(1) November 1988 Land Use Survey by McKenna Associates, Incorporated.
(2) Comprehensive Community Plan, City of Flat Rock (March 1970)

The most substantial commercial development in recent years occurred along
Telegraph Road, north of the railroad tracks. With the construction of Kmart
shopping center and various other nationally-recognized businesses, the north
Telegraph business district has become the center of retail activity in the City.
The central business district is a secondary node of specialty retail and office
activity. Based on recent development patterns, continued business development
on the remaining Telegraph Road frontage and redevelopment of obsolete businesses
can be expected.
Gibraltar Road also has the potential of developing into a commercial node,
benefitting from access to 1-75. Strict adherence to adopted planning policies
will be required to prevent strip commercial development that is common adjacent
to many freeway interchanges.
- 21 -

�"

/

,.

'

_/

;;::::-

1:..··., \"~?

/

/j ;:_.:

r-7)
0

- ~

~~~
~

'\

·,,&lt;&lt;h ·7__ .

Wl .l,__\e_ CAl'IL[TOH

,,

,,
"

,,,,

. ,,,,--- ----L___

If---_ -

'I

.,

,,

,:
\1
1'

I

'1

,,,,
,,

1,

\'

'

....
. ,,.

H~W~tRG

,,,,

\\

,,

'I

LEGEND
□

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

B

MOBILE HOME PARK

~

RAILROAD

COMMERCIAL

UTILITIES

OFFICE

PUBLIC &amp; SEMI-PUBLIC

INDUSTRIAL

PARKS &amp; RECREATION

LANDFILL

■

VACANT

EXISTING LAND · USE ■ ■ ■
■ ■ CITY
OF FLAT ROCK ■ ■
■ WAYNE COUNTY ■ . MICHIGAN ■

■ ■ ■

m
north

,c,lo

...~~-~-I:.:::!._. . .:l: :~

~i: I

MAP 1

M!eKenna Associates, Incorporated
Community Planning • Urban Design
Farmington Hills, Michigan

�r. :
'

L.

Industrial Land Use

!

~

Industrial land use recorded the largest percentage increase of any land use
since 1970. The allocation of an additional 354 acres of land for industrial
use represented a 633 percent increase over the 1970 industrial land use figure.
The 1988 land use survey revealed that about 10 acres of land are currently used
for industrial purposes.
The most significant industrial construction during the past two decades was the
Mazda manufacturing facility (formerly a Ford plant). The construction of this
facility marked a reorientation of industry in Flat Rock, toward 1-75 instead
of Telegraph Road. The facility also set a new standard for industrial design
in the City.
Little growth was recorded in Flat Rock's older industrial district near the City
center during the past two decades. Older industries along the railroad and
Telegraph Road were developed at a time when environmental planning issues were
of minor importance in industrial districts. Consequently, inadequate parking,
buffering, and screening of outside storage areas are common problems. The size
and configuration of the sites themselves do not meet the needs of modern
Industry.
Based on recent development patterns, continued decline of the older industrial
district can be expected.
The opportunity exists to develop new light
manufacturing, research, and warehousing uses on the east side of the City, where
there is convenient access to 1-75. Light industrial development is proposed
in the Gateway Commerce Center. Also, planned industrial park development would
be an appropriate transitional use to buffer existing and new single family
development from the railroad and Mazda.

Public and Semi-Public Uses
I
I
I

The amount of land allocated for public and semi-public uses decreased by about
48 acres between 1970 and 1988, a decrease of almost 19 percent. The 1988 land
use survey revealed that about 208 acres of land are currently used for public
and semi-public purposes. The overall decrease is attributed chiefly to a
decrease in the amount of land owned by the Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority
(HCMA) The 1970 survey indicated the about 147 acres were owned by HCMA.

I.

l
1·

i

I

IL
'\

_

The amount of land occupied by schools, municipal buildings, and religious
institutions actually increased over the past two decades . New buildings
constructed during this period include the Flat Rock municipal building, several
churches located along Gibraltar Road and Huron River Ori ve, and the senior
citizens building in the central business district.
The most significant
transition in the public and semi-public land use category over the past two
decades involved the general movement of such uses out of the CBD to larger sites
elsewhere in the City.

- 23 -

�Transportation
The amount of land allocated for transportation uses decreased by about 48 acres
between 1970 and 1988, a decrease of about 10 percent. The 1988 land use survey
revealed that about 530 acres of land are currently used for transportation
purposes, including street rights-of-way and the railroad.
The overall decrease is due to loss of the airport, which occupied about 57 acres
according to the 1970 land use survey. The amount of land occupied by street
rights-of-way increased by a small amount, reflecting the construction of new
subdivision streets and the widening of certain rights-of-way.

Landfills
The 1988 land use survey revealed that 164 acres, or almost four percent of the
City's total land area is occupied by land that was formerly used as landfill.
There are two such landfill sites in the City:
The former Ford Motor Company landfill on the east side of Hall Road,
between Vreeland and Gibraltar Roads, and
The landfill site located on the west side of Arsenal Road at the City's
northern boundary.
The land occupied by these former landfills apparently cannot be used in the
foreseeable future. Of far greater significance is the impact these landfills
have on development of adjacent lands.

Vacant Land
The 1988 land use survey revealed that 2,110 acres, or about 49 percent of the
City's total land area remains undeveloped. There are . four broad undeveloped
areas in the City:
in the northwest corner, between Inkster and Arsenal Roads,
in the central part of the City, north of Gibraltar Road and west of Cahill
Road,
in the southcentral part of the City, south of Gibraltar Road extending to
Huron River Drive, and
in the southeast corner of the City, in the southwest quadrant of the I75/Gibraltar Road interchange.
In addition, opportunities for development exist on vacant lands along the river,
and on scattered vacant sites fronting on various thoroughfares.

- 24 -

�-'

I'

'

,---

I

•.

•

REGIONAL LAND USE RELATIONSHIPS
Overview
Flat Rock is a part of the sub-region known as "Downriver." This sub-region
extends approximately seventeen miles along the Detroit River, from Detroit to
Huron River.
Downriver contains some of the most intensively developed industrial land in
southeast Mi chi gan. A recent SEMCOG report characterized the northernmost
Downriver communities as follows:
From north to south, the corridor is a series of blast furnaces, coke
ovens, oil tanks, chemical plants, and similar industrial structures,
alternating with such extensive land uses as coal piles, slag heaps,
and chemical waste ponds.
The overall image of the Downriver area as an intensively developed industrial
region is not stt:ictly applicable to southernmost communities, such as Flat
Rock. Although Flat Rock has large scale industrial development, such as the
Mazda plant and the Grand Trunk rail classification yard, the City also has
hundreds of acres of land that are vacant or used for agriculture.
These vast undeveloped areas provide Flat Rock and other southern Downriver
communities with the opportunity to implement a new land use pattern that
redefines the Downriver image.
Indeed, the master plans for the southern
Downriver commun it i e.s propose a range of complementary land uses, with an
uncustomary emphasis on housing, commercial facilities, recreation, as well as
the traditional industrial uses.
Although most of the City has been subject to the intensive industrial
development that characterizes the northern Downriver communities, the City has
not been completely insulated from the impact of industrial development in the
region.
A recent report identified four sites in Flat Rock that are
contaminated with toxic industrial wastes. These site include the Michigan
Environmental Services Company waste oil transport, treatment, and recycling
facility; Huron Quarry Sanitary Landfill; Mand P Landfill; and, Erving and
Vivian Brown Landfill.

Planning Relationships to Surrounding Communities

[_

l
..

The City of Fl at Rock is surrounded by seven communities: Huron Township,
Brownstown Township, Woodhaven, Rockwood, South Rockwood, Berlin Township, and
Ash Township. Following review of the land use and adopted master plans of
surrounding communities, two general observations can be made:
1. The past and expected future pattern of land use in Flat Rock should not
deter adjoining communities from achieving their 1and use objectives.
Furthermore, the proposed pattern of development in surrounding communities
- 25 -

i .

�,·

';

'
.,_

[--

.
does not appear to be in conflict with desired land use development in Flat
Rock.

iI

L_

2. Coordination of future development in adjoining communities would achieve
benefits in terms of urban design and the efficient use of public utilities.

[

. The -following analysis explores the land use relationships with adjoining
communities in greater detail.

[

The Northern Border. Brownstown Township and Woodhaven adjoin Flat Rock on the
north. Brownstown Township's master plan calls for single-family development
between Inkster and Arsenal Roads, and a combination of multiple-family and
mobile home park uses between Arsenal and Peters Roads. This pattern of
development is compatible with the adjoining land use and zoning in Fr at Rock,
which indicates a combination of single- and multiple-family land use west of
Telegraph Road, and mobile home park use east of Telegraph Road.

[

I_

Woodhaven's master plan specifies light and heavy industrial use between Peters
Road and I-75, north of Vreeland Road.
This pattern of development is
compatible with the adjoining General Manufacturing and Railroad Industrial
zoning classifications, which accommodate the Mazda plant and Grand Trunk rail
classification yard in Flat Rock.
The Eastern Border. I-75 provides a substantial buffer between Flat Rock and
Brownstown Township, the adjoining community to the east. The master plan for
Brownstown Township specifies single- and multiple-family uses south of Vreeland
Road. Commercial development is proposed for the intersection of I -75 and
Gibraltar Road. Planned unit development and light industrial use is indicated
for land south of Gibraltar Road.

i
I_

L.

The evolving land use pattern in Flat Rock is consistent with Brownstown
Township's master plan in that land around the interchange is proposed for
intensive, planned mixed use development in both communities. Consequently, the
opportunity exists to create a full-service commercial/office/lodging district
to meet the needs of travellers along I-75 as well as residents in surrounding
communities.
Because· of the physical separation provided by I-75, the compatibility of
adjoining land use is of less importance north and south of the Gibraltar Road
interchange.
The Southern Border. Flat Rock is bordered by four communities on the south:
Rockwood, plus three communities across the Huron River in Monroe County. The
river itself and the heavy vegetation along its banks provides a buffer between
Flat Rock and communities to south. Nevertheless, the single-family development
pattern in the south portion of Flat Rock is consistent with a similar adjoining
pattern of development in communities to the south.
The Western Border. Huron Township adjoins Flat Rock on the west. The master
plan for Huron Township specifies park use south of the Huron River, and singlefamily development north of the river.
- 26 -

�'··
&lt;.

r--

•

This pattern of development is consistent with the adjoining pattern of existing
and zoned development in Flat Rock. The zoning map indicates single-family and
industrial use south of the river along the western boundary. In spite of the
existing zoning, ownership patterns indicate that industrial-zoned land adjacent
to Huron Township will eventually be developed as parkland by the Huron-Clinton
Metropolitan Authority. Single-family development is the predominant land use
north of the river in Flat Rock.

Additional Regional Issues
In addition to the immediate impact from land use in adjoining communities,
there are a number of planning issues which relate to the broader metropolitan
area. These issues are analyzed in the following pages.
Regional Patterns of Growth. The strength of the regional economy and the
patterns of regional development will affect the pace of future development in
Flat Rock. Housing construction trends provide one measure of the impact of the
patterns of regional growth on local communities. New housing construction
occurred at a steady pace in most communities in southern Downriver during the
197O's. The recession in the early 198O's brought housing construction to a
virtual halt. As the economy rebounded, housing construction resumed, but at
a modest pace compared to construction in other parts of the region. Statistics
indicate that the overall current direction of growth in the region is not
toward the Downriver area, but is focused more toward communities to the north
and west.
Evidence indicates that steady growth of the Downriver economy is continuing,
however. For example, Downriver housing sales in 1987 outpaced housing sales
in the state as a whole, increasing by 8.7 percent over 1986 sales levels.
Other reports have documented over $1.9 billion in industrial investment since
1984. Should this pattern of economic growth continue, Flat Rock is wellpositioned to benefit. A recent report prepared by the Downriver Planning Group 2
made the following observation: "It is clear that Downriver development is
moving in a westward direction; consequently, development south of Pennsylvania
is now centered somewhat west of 1-75."
Proximity to 1-75.
Flat Rock has direct access to 1-75, which has been
described as the state's most important industrial corridor. 1-75 provides Flat
Rock with access to industrial and commercial centers in southeastern Michigan
and Ohio. Furthermore, the direct freeway access provides industries in Flat
Rock with transportation savings, an expanded labor market, and an expanded
market area in general. The large volume of traffic along I-75 also represents
a potential market for Flat Rock retail businesses. Traffic counts taken in
1986 indicate that about 43,800 vehicles travel on 1-75 in the vicinity of
Gibraltar Road during an average 24-hour period.

1

Downriver Planning Group, Analysis of Regional Projects and Development
Opportunities, 1988.
- 27 -

�r·

Regional Utility Systems. The South Huron Valley Waste Control System is a
major regional utility which has had a substantial impact on growth in the
southernmost Downriver communities. Prior to construction of a $34 million
wastewater treatment plant which was completed in early 1988, development was
held up because of inadequate capacity of the sanitary sewer system. With
completion of the treatment pl ant, development is expected to resume, in
particular to address the latent demand for housing in Flat Rock, and the nearby
communities of Gibraltar, Woodhaven, Brownstown Township, Huron Township, Van
Buren Township, and South Rockwood.
Regional
regional
because
regional

Activity Centers.
Certain activity centers in Flat Rock have a
imp act, because of the market served, the level of employment, or
of the services provided. The three principal existing or roposed
activity centers in Flat Rock are as follows:

- Mazda Vehicle Assembly Plant. The Mazda plant contains 2,700,000 square feet
of floor area and provides employment for approximately 3,500 persons. The
Mazda plant is credited with being the catalyst for a additional industrial
development in Downriver, as well as creating demand for housing in nearby
communities.

I

- Gateway Commerce Center. The Gateway Commerce Center is a planned mixed used
development located south of the Mazda Assembly Plant, adjacent to I-75. If
implemented as planned, this 300-acre development will be a regional center
of economic activity.
Retail and restaurant uses are planned near to
Gibraltar Road, research and office uses farther south, and industrial uses
in the southernmost portions.
- Grand Trunk Railroad Classification Yard. Because of its function, the Grand
Trunk rail classification yard has a regional impact. The classification yard
is an important infrastructure requirement for large-scale manufacturing
facilities which receive and deliver shipments throughout the country by rail.

Metropark Development. Although no d·eve loped Metropark land is actua 11 y 1ocated
in Flat Rock, the Oakwood and Willows Metroparks in Huron Township have the
potential of creating a regional impact. In 1987, over 185,000 vehicles entered
these two parks. Plans call for continued development of the parks, including
the provision of winter sports, pedal boats, put-in-take fishing, additional
golf course development, picnic areas, and campgrounds.
Employment would
increase to 25 full-time and 135 part-time employees. Upon completion of these
improvements in 10 to 15 years, the two parks are expected to generate over
400,000 vehicle trips per year. This level of activity is likely to have a
spillover impact on adjoining communities, generating increased traffic on
access roads and possibly expanding the market for retail businesses.

- 28 -

�HOUSING REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
I

•

Introduction

I

Even though Flat Rock is a relatively small community, it contains a broad
variety of housing types:
- Older, wood-frame housing is located near the City center, primarily east of
Telegraph Road.
- Newer conventional single family neighborhoods are located south of Gibraltar
Road, east of the City center.
- Large lot single-family development in rural-like settings is located along
Huron River Drive, Arsenal Road, Cahill Road, and other roads which extend
into the sparsely-developed portions of Flat Rock .
- Cottage-type dwellings are located along certain segments of Huron River
Drive, providing residents with the recreational benefits of living on the
riverfront.
- Higher density multiple-family housing is located in various locations,
generally in proximity to the major roads, such as Gibraltar and Telegraph
Roads.
I

l. -

Mobile home development is located in the north end of the City, east of
Telegraph Road.
According to the 1980 Census and more recent SEMCOG building permit statistics,
there are approximately 2,390 housing units in the City. There are 763 occupied
rental units, or about 32 percent of all occupied units. In comparison, about
33.5 percent of all occupied housing units in Wayne County as a whole are rental
units.
Housing construction during the 1970' s increased the proportion of rental
housing in the City.
Approximately half of the almost 800 housing units
constructed between 1970 and 1980 were multiple-family units according to Census
statistics.
In contrast, although there has been very little housing
development in the 1980's, single-family development has been predominant.
Almost 80 percent of the housing units for which building permits have been
issued in the 1980's have been single-family units.

Age and Condition of Housing

L:

Housing age statistics reveal that the period of greatest growth in Flat Rock
was over thirty years ago (see Table 9). More homes were constructed in the
1950's -- over 700 units -- than any other decade in Flat Rock's history.
Furthermore , over 60 percent of all housing units were constructed prior to
1960. The pace of housing construction remained steady in the 1960' s and
- 29 -

�1970's. The units constructed during these two decades account for about 39
percent of all housing units in the City.
L

TABLE 9

l

AGE OF HOUSING

Construction Period

Cit~ of Flat Rock
Percent
No. of Units

1.1%

Wayne County
Percent

2.1%

1980 - 1987

27

1975 - 1980

304

12.7

3.9

1970 - 1974

354

14.8

5.9

1960 - 1969

267

11. 2

11.6

1950 - 1959

705

29.5

22.7

1940 - 1949

289

12.0

22.2

1939 or earlier

445

18.6

31.5

I

I

L

2,391

I

Source: Bureau of the Census, Department of Commerce.
1980-1987 Figures: Southeast Michigan Council of Governments.

l

I.

r

I.

A combination of two factors -- the recessionary economy and inadequate sewer
capacity -- dampened the pace of housing construction in the 1980's. Building
permits for only 27 housing units have been issued during the past seven years.
These 27 units account for about 1.1 percent of all housing units in the City.
Although Flat Rock has a high proportion of older housing units, the housing
stock in Wayne County as a whole is even older. Over 76 percent of all housing
units in Wayne County were built prior to 1960. However, the rebound in housing
construction in the 1980's has been stronger in Wayne County than for Flat Rock.
Units built during the past seven years account for 2.1 percent of all housing
units in Wayne County as a whole.
In spite of its age, housing in Flat Rock is in generally good condition. The
need for repair and rehabilitation is evident in the older neighborhood
surrounding the City center. Conditions which contribute to the deterioration
of housing in this area include the age of the housing, the impact from
encroaching non-residential uses, and the conversion of some homes originally
designed for single-family use into multiple-family dwellings or commercial uses

- 30 -

�!

L ..

Housing deterioration is also evident along certain roads where large lot
single-family development has occurred in a somewhat discontinuous pattern.
Development in these fringe areas consists of a variety of housing designs and
styles, constructed at different periods of time in accordance with different
construction standards. Homes, outbuildings, and yards on some of the parcels
in these areas have not been consistently well-maintained.
Generally, housing in most other neighborhoods in Flat Rock is in good
condition. However, the majority of the housing stock exceeds thirty years of
age. Typically, this is the age at which the need for major repairs and
replacement become apparent. Thus, maintenance of the housing stock will be
increasingly important in future years.

Housing Size and Density
Housing size in Flat Rock is about average for Wayne County. The median size
of owner-occupied housing is 5.8 rooms in Flat Rock, compared to 5.7 rooms for
the County as a whole. The median size of renter-occupied housing is 4.0 rooms
in Flat Rock and 4.3 rooms in Wayne County.
As indicated in Table 10, almost half of the housing units in Flat Rock have
five or six rooms. In comparison, about 54 percent of the housing units in
Wayne County as a whole have five or six housing units.

TABLE 10
SIZE OF HOUSING UNITS

No. of Rooms

l.
I..

I

I••

1
2.
3
4
5
6
7
8 or more
Source:

Cit~ of Flat Rock
No. of Units
Percent
32
29
163
464
663
489
358
165

1.3%
1.2
6.9
19.6
28.1
20.7
15.2
7.0

Wavne County
Percent

Oakland Count~
Percent

1.4%
2.7
8.6
13.6
29.6
24.3
10.8
9.0

0.6%
1.8
7.9
15 .1
22.4
20.5
13.2
18.5

Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce (1980 Data)

Although Flat Rock compares favorably with the rest of the County in terms of
housing size, homes are somewhat larger in the developing northern portion of
southeast Michigan. In Oakland County, for example, the median size of owneroccupied housing is 6.2 rooms. Almost a third of all housing units in Oakland
County have seven or more rooms.
- 31 -

�The highest density of single-family residential development in Flat Rock is in
the conventional subdivisions near the City center and south of Gibraltar Road.
The gross density of development in the subdivision located south of Gibraltar
Road and east of Evergreen Road is about 4.2 units per acre. The gross density
is about 3.5 units per acre in the single-family neighborhood east of Telegraph
near the City center, and in the subdivision located east of Olmstead and south
of Gibraltar heed.
Aside from the scattered residential development on agricultural lands, the
lowest density of single-family development is along such roads as Huron River
Drive, Arsenal, Vreeland, Cahill, and Woodruff.
Lots in some linear
subdivisions along these roads typically range between one-half and one acre in
size. Most parcels along these roads are not within platted subdivisions, and
consequently they range in size from less than an acre to five or more acres in
size. It appears that land along these roads may have once been divided for
use as narrow strip farms. Along Huron River Drive, though, it appears the land
has been divided to maximize the number of parcels with access to the
riverfront.
Higher density multiple-family development has occurred in a few locations along
major roads in Flat Rock, for example, on the south side of Gibraltar Road,
Vreeland Road near Telegraph, Olmstead Road in the south part of the City, and
off of Telegraph Road. Multiple-family development consists of predominantly
two-story apartments and townhouses, constructed at an average density of 15
units or less per acre.

Value of Housing
According to the 1980 Census, a majority of homes in Flat Rock have a value of
between $40,000 and $59,999 {see Table 11). About 28 percent of the homes have
a value of less than $40,000, and about 18 percent have a value of $60,000 or
more. This assessment is based on the values specified by homeowners themselves.
The housing values reported on the 1980 Census may be outdated, based on recent
reports. A recent newspaper report on the Downriver housing market stated:
"Nowadays, buyers are snatching up homes as fast as sellers can pack their
dishes in boxes. In fact, Downriver recorded the biggest sales gain of any
Michigan region during the first half of 1987 ... "3
I

L

The report further indicated that the increased demand for homes has produced
a substantial increase in average sales price. The average sales price in the
Downriver area was $42,422 in 1982. The average sales price reported for 1987
had increased to $54,083. Real estate analysts further report that a higherpriced homes constitute a larger share of the total sales.

3

r-

Joe Hoshaw Jr., "Home buyers set rapid pace," The News Herald Newspapers,
September 9, 1987, sec. p. 1.

L

- 32 -

�l. .
TABLE 11
VALUE OF HOUSING
1980

Value Range

r·

City of Flat Rock
No. of Units
Percent

23.6%

14.4%

25.1

37.2

31.9

777

54.4

22.0

25.8

$60,000 - $99,999

236

16.5

13.8

20.9

$100,000 or more

17

1.2

3.3

7.0

Less than $20,000

40

$20,000 - $39,999

359

$40,000 - $59,999

2.8%

Wavne Count~ SMSA
Percent
Percent

Source: Bureau of the Census, U.S. Department of Commerce (as reported by

homeowners on the 1980 Census)

Projected Housing Demand
The projections set forth in the Population Analysis indicate that the
population of Flat Rock is expected to increase by 2,663 residents to 9,486 by
the year 2005. At the same time, the average househo 1d size is expected to
decrease to 2.31 persons.
To accommodate a net population increase of
residents, an additional 1,792 housing units would have to be constructed by the
year 2005.
If the existing proportions of renter and owner-occupied housing is maintained
in the future, then 573 of the projected 1,792 housing units will be rental
units, and 1,219 will be owner-occupied units. Required residential land area
can be computed using average densities of 15 units per gross acre for rental
units and 3.5 units per gross acre for owner-occupied housing. Accordingly, a
total Jand area of 386 acres is needed to accommodate the projected demand for
housing by the year 2005.
Sufficient land area exists in various locations throughout the City to
accommodate this need for residential housing. For example, vacant developable
acreage exists north of Gibraltar Road and west of Cahill Road, west of Arsenal
Road on the west side of the City, and north and south of Woodruff Road in the
southeast part of the City. The land in these areas is appropriately zoned for
residential use.

- 33 -

L.,.

�ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
Existing Economic Base
l.

l_

The economic base in Flat Rock consists of chiefly two components: the
industrial sector and the commercial/service sector. The industrial sector
serves a regional market, and draws employment from throughout southeast
Michigan. In contrast, the commercial/service district serves principally local
residents and trave 11 ers a1ong Telegraph Road. Characteristics of these two
components of the economic base are described in the following paragraphs.

Industrial Sector

I_

I·

l.

I_
r·

I

Based on total employment, volume of production, and similar criteria, the
industrial base in Flat Rock is dominated by the Mazda Motor Manufacturing (USA)
Corporation, which is located at the I-75/Gibraltar Road interchange. The Mazda
plant contains about 2.7 million square feet of floor space, and employs about
3,500 people when at full production. Full production capability of the Mazda
plant is 240,000 vehicles.
Flat Rock contains a variety of other, smaller industrial-type concerns, many
of which have been in operation for several years. These include Flat Rock
Metals, Scheel Concrete, AAA Sign Company, Flat Rock Bagging Company, and Astro
Oil. Most of these industrial facilities are located on the west side of the
City, in proximity to the Telegraph Road corridor.
The
Grand
Trunk
rail
classification
yard
is
also
a
major
industrial/transportation facility. This classification yard serves industry
throughout southeast Michigan. The classification yard is located on the north
side of Vreeland Road, just over a half mile west of I-75.

Commercial/Service SectorThe commercial/service sector in Flat Rock consists of three districts: the
downtown area; the linear commercial district along Telegraph Road, north of the
railroad tracks; and, the linear commercial district along Gibraltar Road,
extending from I-75 to downtown. The businesses in these three districts
provide basic necessities. However, residents must shop outside of the City for
certain goods and services, particularly if they desire a broader selection of
comparison goods. Also, certain specialized services, such as the services of
a stockbroker or medical specialist, must be acquired outside of the City.
Numerically, service-type businesses and retail businesses are predominant in
Flat Rock's commercial/service sector. About 40 out of a total of 149 existing
businesses provide some type of service. Service businesses include beauty and
barber shops, dry cleaning establishments, car washes, video rental, vehicle
repair shops, heating and air conditioning service establishments, and similar
uses.

i_

- 34 -

�Retail stores account for 36 of the businesses in Flat Rock. Convenience retail
uses are predominant, accounting for almost half of all retail uses.
Convenience goods are those that are consumed on a daily basis, such as
groceries, drugs, and hardware items.
About thirty percent of a11 retail businesses of fer comparison or "shopper"
goods. Comparison goods are purchased less frequently and usually only after
people have compared prices and quality of competing stores. Examples of
comparison goods businesses in Flat Rock include the auto dealerships, the
lumber company, the floor covering store, and the paint store.
Flat Rock also contains seven specialty retail establishments, accounting for
about twenty percent of all retail uses.
Specialty retail establishments
include gift shops, a tack shop, bait and tackle shops, and a mobile home supply
business.
In addition to service and retail businesses, other major categories of business
in Flat Rock include offices and restaurant-type uses. A total of 26 office
uses are located in the Flat Rock commercial/service districts. Most offices are
occupied by banks, insurance agents, attorneys, and medical practitioners.

i.

Restaurant-types
uses
include full-service
restaurants,
fast
food
establishments, and bars. There are 19 restaurant-type uses located in Flat
Rock.
Other types of businesses located in the commercial/service sector of Flat Rock
include hotels/motels (4 establishments), equipment rental businesses (2),
public uses (1), and recreation uses (2). Ten vacant commercial buildings or
storefronts are presently located in Flat Rock.

Market Profile
According to data compiled by Urban Decisions Systems, the retail market located
within a five-mile radius contains 25,411 households with a total population of
73,957. 4 The median annual household income is estimated at $36,731.

I_ _

l

By 199~, the number of households in the market area is projected to increase
to 26,741 and the population is expected to increase to 75,717. The median
annual household income is expected to increase substantially, reaching .$46,166
in 1992. These projections indicate that, although the number of households and
total population is expected increase by a modest amount, the purchasing power
of residents is expected to increase substant i a1ly. Thus, based on income
projections alone, there is strong potential for expansion of the retail sector
in Flat Rock.

4

Source of market data: Urban Decisions Systems, Inc., as reported in Gateway
Convnerce Center, a market study prepared by Rainmaker Holdings, Inc., January
1988.
- 35 -

�I
I

'

I.

I

•

· The market study for the Gateway Commerce Center revealed that t~ere is market
support for specific types of retail stores in the trade area. These conclusions
are based on a random survey of residents in the trade area that was conducted
as a part of the market study.

I.. ·

The survey found that, due to the limited range of shopping facilities in the
trade area, a majority of residents shop at malls or shopping.centers outside
of the trade area for non-grocery items. Southland Mall in Southgate is the most
popular shopping center, frequented by 43 percent of residents in the trade area.

l.

The market survey found that many residents would be willing to change their
shopping habits in favor of new retail facilities that offer better selection,
better services, or more competitive prices. In particular, the survey found
that development opportunities are best for certain services (such as tax
preparers, cleaners, and eye care), clothing stores, general merchandise stores,
a large hardware store, a department store, recreation services (such as a movie
theater or bowling establishment), and full-service restaurants.

Commercial Land Needs
The income data presented above can be used to calculate the purchasing power
of residents and the amount of retail space needed to serve the trade area
population. Data collected by the U.S. Census indicates that about 39 percent
of all personal income is spent on retail goods, with about ten percent spent
on durab 1e goods and about 29 percent on nondurable and convenience goods.
Accordingly, the potential retail sales volume generated by residents in the
trade area is estimated as follows:
Durable Goods:
Nondurable Goods:

$123,016,620
356,748,200

Total Potential Retail
Sales Volume:

$ 479,764,820

Retail floor area requirements are calculated by dividing the sales volume
estimates by sales per square foot information for existing businesses.
Information concerning sales per square foot are provided by the Urban Land
Institute in its annual publication Dollars and Cents of Shopping Centers, the
U.S. Census, and various local economic development publications. Based on these
sources the average sales per square foot is estimated to be about $125 for
comparison goods and about $225 for convenience goods businesses. Based on these
averages, the retail floor space needed to serve the 1992 trade area population
is estimated to be 10,278,722 square feet.

I..

A general standard for retail uses is that the total site area should be about
four times the gross building area. Based on this ratio, the land area needed
to accommodate the future commercial needs of residents in the trade area is
about 240 acres. Since only about 112 acres of land are allocated for commercial
use in Flat Rock, according to the 1988 land use survey, the opportunities for
future growth of the commercial sector appear strong. This trade area need,
however, will be addressed partially by commercial facilities in surrounding
communities.
- 36 -

�.

Commercial District Profiles
North Telegraph Road Business District. Analysis of the distribution of
businesses reveals that the City's three commercial/service districts serve
different functions and markets. The linear commercial district along Telegraph
Road north of the railroad tracks appears to be the primary focus of retail
activity in the City. Retail, service, and restaurant uses are predominant in
this district.
The quality, character, and size is as important as the actual number of
businesses in this district.
North Telegraph Road is Flat Rock' s newest
commercial/service district, containing regional and nationally-recognized
businesses located in modern-looking buildings on spacious sites.
The
combination of generally attractive surroundings and modern marketing techniques
increase the appeal of this district. Of the three commercial/office districts
1ocated in the City, north Telegraph Road generates the greatest amount of
economic activity.
Downtown Flat Rock. Compared to the north Telegraph Road district, downtown Flat
Rock contains almost twice as many businesses, including almost twice as many
retail and service uses. However, the level of economic activity in the downtown
area does not match the level of activity along north Telegraph Road, for the
following reasons:

I-

I.

!I -

l...

- The downtown business district was developed several decades ago. Many
buildings and businesses have not been modernized or updated in recent years.
- The downtown area was initially planned
intensively-developed, compact district.
buildings are small. Modern standards call
street parking, and much larger buildings
merchandise.

with the intent of creating an
Lots are shallow and narrow, and
for spacious lots with ample offto contain a greater variety of

- The economic impact of the downtown area is dispersed among several streets,
including Huron River Drive; Gibraltar Road, between Division Street and
Tel~graph Road; Seneca Street; and Telegraph Road, between the river and the
ra i1 road tracks. The economic imp act of downtown businesses is further
dispersed by _the presence of non-commercial uses, including homes and
churches, in the business district.
A report completed in 1976 cited these and similar concerns about the central
business district. 5
Among the conclusions stated in CBD Report are the
following:

5

Norman L. Dietrich Associates, P. C. , City of Flat Rock CBD Report, April,
1976.
- 37 -

�There is no smooth continuous east/west through traffic flow in the study
area.
- The number of streets and alleyways that segment the CBD are a deterrent to
sound commercial growth.
- There is no separation of through traffic, local traffic, and shopper traffic.
- The Huron River has been neglected as an important resource and focal point
in the central business district.
- The center of gravity for commercial growth in the central business district
is along Telegraph Road with a small nucleus at Telegraph and Huron River
Drive.
- The Telegraph Road frontage has many of the problems associated with typical
strip development, such as excessive signage, fragmented facades, and lack of
any real identity or sense of place.
- The mixed use area has within it the basic framework for sound development.
- Where possible, more intensive residential developments should occur within
or on the fringe of the central business district.
Many of the concerns cited in the CBD report have been addressed in the
intervening· years~
The visual appearance and pedestrian environment were
improved through implementation of a streetscape program. Construction is nearly
complete on a new senior citizens housing complex on Telegraph Road in the heart
of the central business district.
Nevertheless, because of certain inherent constraints, downtown Flat Rock
accommodates many comparatively small specialty retail and service businesses
which do not depend on a steady or large volume of customers or sales for their
livelihood. For example, several businesses in the downtown area operate on an
appointment-only basis, and some service businesses have little or no walk-in
trade at all.

1.-

The downtown does stand apart from the City's other commercial/service districts
because of the number of office uses. Twenty office uses are located in the
downtown area, many of which are located in redesigned homes. Offices for
attorneys, medical practitioners, insurance agents, and real estate agents are
well-suited for downtown Flat Rock, because these businesses do not create a
severe traffic or parking demand.
In summary, the evolving development pattern suggests that the economic health
of downtown Fl at Rock depends on a mixture of reta i1 , service, office, and
residential uses.
Gibraltar Road Business District. The third commercial/service district, along
Gibraltar Road between 1-75 and downtown, consists of mostly service-type
businesses, such as service stations, vehicle repair, video rental, and a selfservice auto wash.
- 38 -

i.
i .
L.,

�Businesses along Gibraltar Road are dispersed over a two-mile distance. The
commercial uses are widely separated by the more predominant residential and
institutional uses and vacant land along Gibraltar Road.
The quality of commercial development along Gibraltar Road varies considerably.
A gasoline service station and a Ford auto dealership--both well-maintained,
viable operations -- anchor the district at the east end. New development
proposed for the Gateway Commerce Center is expected to generate additional high
quality, regional-oriented development near 1-75.
I

I-

Elsewhere along corridor, businesses appear to be less viable, and the buildings
and grounds are rundown in appearance. The only shopping center along this
section of Gibraltar Road is dated in appearance, lacks adequate landscaping,
and exhibits signs of inadequate maintenance.

Economic Development Trends
Various local, regional, and national trends affect current and future growth
of the commercial and industrial sectors in Flat Rock. The potential impact of
major economic trends is described in the following paragraphs:
1. General Growth Patterns in Downriver. The general direction of growth in
Downriver indicates that the opportunities for economic growth in Flat Rock
will be strong. A recent analysis of regional projects and development
opportunities found that a significant band of development is taking shape
in the central third of the Downriver area, generally along the 1-75
corridor. 6 A recent newspaper report further noted that "The Downriver is
growing to the south and west, thanks largely to affluent families looking
to build new homes instead of buying existing ones." 7 As the leading edge
of development in the region continues to expan_d to the west and south,
proposals for new development can be expected in Flat Rock.

i-i

2. Growth in the Trade Area.
Aside from regional growth patterns, the
projections cited earlier in this chapter indicate there is inherent growth
in the Flat Rock trade area. Modest increases in the number of residents
and households are projected, but a substant i a1 increase in the average
hous.ehold income is expected. This inherent growth in the trade area
creates the opportunity for steady expansion of the local economy.

,1

I

i
t__

6

Downriver East-West Trunkline Studv, vol.
1987.

7

Curt Smith, "Burgeoning Communities Record Housing Bonanza," The News-Herald,
December 28, 1988, p. 10-A.
- 39 -

2 - Data Inventory, November 20,

�'·

r·
L

3. Changes in the Methods of Reta i 1i ng. Methods of reta i 1i ng have changed
dramatically since the time when downtown and many isolated businesses were
constructed. Modern retailing standards call for much larger inventory than
in the past, spacious sites with off-street parking, and high-visibility.
These changes in retailing affect the viability of older businesses and
business districts, particularly the central business district, which is now
better-suited as a specialty retail and office district.
Even older
businesses along Telegraph Road north of the railroad tracks are
experiencing intense competition from the newer businesses. Consequently,
continued redevelopment of i so 1ated obsolete reta i 1 businesses can be
expected along Telegraph Road.
4. Changes in Industrial Processes and Industrial Development Standards.
Industrial operations have changed substantially in the past two decades,
creating growth opportunities and rendering certain industrial operations
obsolete. Small industrial plants on cramped sites in the heart of the City
fail to meet the standards of modern industries. In terms of function, most
small and medium-size industries no longer rely on rail transportation.
Modern industries are concerned about image, availability of space for
loading/unloading, availability of space for expansion, and isolation from
incompatible residential or commercial uses.
Most new industrial
development occurs in planned industrial parks. Studies have shown that
Downriver has failed to keep up with the needs of modern industry, as
reflected in the fact that Downriver contains only 12 percent of all
industrial parks in southeast Michigan. This development void provides an
opportunity in Flat Rock to develop industrial park facilities that meet
the needs of modern industries.

;
l ·-

5. Growth in the Service Sector. Increasingly, industrial commodities are
being replaced by knowledge-based and information-based services as the most
critical components in the national economy. The result of this trend is
the growth of the service sector, including such businesses as information
processing, transportation, communications, insurance, financial services,
accounting, l ega 1 counseling, management consulting, advertising, design
services, real estate, marketing, and so forth. The growth of the service
sector creates opportunities for development of office-oriented businesses,
which are not currently well-represented in the local economy or Downriver
as a whole.
6. Computerized Technology.
The widespread introduction of computerized
technology is creating new operating procedures for business organizations.
The most apparent impact of computer technology is to automate low-skilled
work. Computer technology also permits remote management, so that the
production of services need not take place where the services are consumed
or used. As a result, certain clerical and other functions normally
associated with management need not be located in the same high-rent office
district as the administrative offices. The relatively low cost of land in
Fl at Rock could meet the requirements for such computer-1 inked office
functions.

r·

Ii

- 40 -

�'
L.

7. Proximity
analyzing
center at
following

to Metro Airport, Detroit, and Toledo. In recent market studies
the potential demand for a suite hotel and executive conference
the Gateway Commerce Center, Pannell, Kerr and Forster cited the
locational factors in favor of such facilities:

- Proximity to Detroit Metropolitan Airport,
Accessibility to the entire Detroit metropolitan area via I-75 or I-275,
- Accessibility to Monroe, Toledo, and locations farther south.
These same 1ocat i ona l factors favor the deve 1opment of other types of
commercial, service, and industrial facilities in Flat Rock. For example,
retailers are beginning to realize that by locating their warehouse near the
I-75/I-275 interchange they have direct access to all parts of the
metropolitan area. Similarly, industrial suppliers located in the Flat Rock
area can serve industries in both Detroit and Toledo.

I.
I

!' .

In recent years, the lack of adequate sanitary sewer
8. Sewer Capacity.
capacity has hindered economic growth in Flat Rock and surrounding
communities. This constraint was removed with the completion of the South
Huron Valley Wastewater Control System, also called the "minisewer," which
serves Flat Rock, Brownstown Township, Gibraltar, Huron Township, Woodhaven,
and South Rockwood.
9.

Free-Trade Agreement. According to economic analysts, the recently approved
Free-Trade Agreement (FTA) between the United States and Canada offers the
potential for substantial economic growth in southeast Michigan, including
the Downriver area. According to one report, 10,000 jobs could be created
in southeast Michigan as a result of the FTA. The report further stated that
"proximity to Canada, and cost of land will make the I-75 corridor
attractive to businesses that want to capitalize on the FTA. The Gateway
Commerce Center, in particular, could benefit from the FTA if the impact is
as widespread as predicted.

10. Spin-off Effect of Mazda. Flat Rock has yet to realize the full spin-off
effect from Mazda, resulting from the construction of small manufacturing
facilities by suppliers. The benefits of Mazda's presence has been felt by
several surrounding communities, such as Rockwood, where Mazda suppliers
have located. The potential for additional spin-off benefit from Mazda
exists in Flat Rock, provided that industrial park facilities are available
to accommodate the manufacturing concerns.

[[

[
r

I,_

11.

Catalyst Effect from the Senior Citizens Building. Completion of the senior
citizens residence could be a catalyst that generates new growth in downtown
Flat Rock, in contrast to the longstanding pattern of development in the
outlying areas of the City. Besides providing a market for some types of
retail stores and service businesses, the building provides a new, modern
image for downtown. Frequently, a development of such magnitude induces
other property owners and businesses to update their facilities or
operations.
- 41 -

�Conclusions:

I

Potential for Future Growth

Potential for Future Commercial and Office Development. The analysis presented
in this chapter indicates that strong potential for future commercial and office
development exists in Flat Rock, as the population, number of households, and
total income in the trade area continues to increase. Research cited herein
reveals that the Flat Rock trade area is currently underserved in terms of retail
facilities, based on comparison with other communities.
The potential for further commercial growth is also reflected by survey research,
which revealed that residents of the trade area travel several miles to major
shopping centers to do much of their shopping. Many residents indicated they
would be willing to change their shopping patterns if competitive, quality retail
facilities were constructed nearby. In summary, it appears that the strongest
need is for community-oriented shopping centers and services.
As such development occurs, it is expected that the particular function, or
market niche, of each commercial district will become better defined. North
Telegraph Road is expected to retain its status as the primary retail and service
district in the City. The downtown area is expected to develop as a mixed use
center of office development and specialty retail. The function of the Gateway
Commerce Center is 1east we 11-defi ned at the present time, a1though the potent i a1
exists for regionally-oriented retail, office, lodging, and light industrial
development.
As one of the main entranceways to the City, the Gibraltar Road frontage west
of Olmstead Road would be best-suited for low-intensity office development.
Offices would be compatible with adjacent institutional uses that have been
developed in recent years, and would provide a good buffer between the road and
existing or future residential development on the interior.
Potential for Future Industrial Development. Prior to construction of the Ford
plant, industrial development in Flat Rock was limited to a variety of small
operations located near the center of the City, generally adjacent to the
railroad tracks. The construction of the Ford plant and then Mazda dramatically
altered the industrial profile of the City. The attributes that attracted Ford
and Ma~da to locate in Flat Rock would be equally attractive to other industries.
Industrial developers cite five major consideration which determine suitable
industrial locations: transportation, labor supply, energy and other utilities,
availability of land, and public policy. Additional considerations that are
relevant when selecting a specific site include the topography and soil
conditions, the direction and composition of population growth, and the types
of industries that are expanding or moving into the area. The following analysis
reveals that, when measured in terms of these considerations, certain portion
of the City are well-suited for industrial development.
- Access to Transportation. The primary industrial location determinant is
convenient access to freeway transportation. Research has shown that over
three-quarters of all land developed for industry is located within 2.5 miles
of an interstate freeway interchange. A freeway location provides industries
- 42 -

�with substantial transportation savings, access to In expanded labor market,
and an expanded trade area. Immediate access to 1-75, which has been described
as the state's most important industrial corridor, was clearly one the major
locational determinant for Ford and Mazda. Heavy industries in the City also
benefit from the Grand Trunk railroad facilities.

[

I

- Labor Supply. The availability of a trained labor force is an industrial
need that can be met by the Downriver labor force. According to the 1980
Census, a greater proportion of people in Downriver are employed in
manufacturing-about 37 percent-than in any other sub-region in southeast
Michigan. In addition, industries in Flat Rock have access to the trained
labor markets in more urbanized communities nearer to Detroit and Toledo.
-

Energy and Utilities.
Industry requires a reliable supply of energy and
adequate utility services, including water supply and sanitary sewer service.
Detroit Edison provides electrical service to the City, and natural gas is
supplied by Michigan Consolidated Gas.

As noted earlier, the limitations caused by inadequate sewer capacity were
resolved with the completion .of the South Huron Valley Wastewater Control
System, also called the "minisewer." The City of Detroit water system
currently serves the City.
- Ava i 1abi 1i ty of Land. The need for 1arge amounts of 1and, both for the
initial construction and for later expansion, has been cited as one of the key
reasons that industries have moved out of urban core areas. Large industrial
sites are needed that are suitable for construction and free from drainage
problems. Several hundred acres of vacant land on the easterly side of the
City could potentially be used for industrial development in Flat Rock. Three
genera 1 areas have been identified as being particularly well-suited for
industrial development:
I. Another manufacturing/heavy industrial use would be appropriate for the
former Ford Motor Company industrial plant on Gibraltar Road at I-75.
2. Light industrial, research, and warehousing uses would be appropriate in
the Gateway Commerce Center industrial park.
3. Light industrial, research, and warehousing uses would also be
appropriate as a buffer along Hall Road and Vreeland Road, to separate
future residential development from Mazda and the Grand Trunk railroad
yard.
- Public Policies. Research in recent years has documented the relationship
between public policies and the ability to successfully operate a business
or industry. Public policies with the greatest impact on industry in Flat
Rock are reflected in the adopted planning and zoning standards. Review of
these documents reveals that the City has set aside sufficient land to
accommodate industrial growth. Further evidence of favorable public policies
include the City's actions to allow Mazda to locate into the City, and
creation of a Planned Unit Development ordinance and tax increment financing
authority to facilitate establishment of the Gateway Commerce Center.
I.
!

I

I.

- 43 -

�r--

I

.

1 .•

1··I

l,·,

.
This analysis indicates that conditions are conducive for industrial growth in
Flat Rock. Vacant lands on the east side of the City are best-suited to the
locational requirements of industry because of the immediate access to 1-75.
Reuse of the vacant Ford Motor Company p1ant for heavy industry would be
appropriate, but other industrial lands would be better-suited for light
industrial, research, and warehousing uses.

t

Fiscal Impact of Economic Growth
Property values pro vi de one of the best measures of economic growth. As
indicated in Table 12, Flat Rock experienced rather substantial decline in
property values from 1982 through 1986. Total State Equalized Value (SEV)
dropped from a high of $152.4 million in 1982 to $79.2 million in 1986, a decline
of about 48 percent.
TABLE 12
PROPERTY VALUE TRENDS

Year

,i ..

($000,000)

Percent
Change

1989

$84.9

1988

81.8

+ 2.3

1987

79.9

+ 0.9

1986

79.2

-11. 3

1985

89.3

-10.7

1984

100.0

-32.6

1983

132.7

-12.9

1982

152.4

+ 5.5

1981

144.5

Source:

- 3.8%

1988 Annual Report, City of Flat Rock.

As indicated in Figure 1, the decline in the total value of property parallels
the decline in the value of industrial property during the same period. Most
of the decrease in value of industrial property can be attributed to the shutdown
of the Ford Motor Company plant. Because of tax abatements, the construction
of Mazda did not restore property levels to their former level .
- 44 I
I

l.

�;----

~

140

110

ililllllllii::11111:::1i

100

90

0

::)

....J

&lt;
&gt;

80

•

·1:1 ■!l~ll!ill!~Ji!!III~~

111:11111111111~

Hlil!il iilillii!ilili!ll!Hiii!!iii!j:iiM
1

70

@
60
en
en
w
en
en
&lt;

/

1

0

~
w

.

·•·•·•·•·'.-'.i;:ft._

120

0

-

---

~I iiiiil lil
ilil!l!l l!II i iili!I ill

130

-g

-

r-~--

50

40

30

20

10

11 1:11

:i;::r

::;I !II

l!'-1!1!1.1!1111111111111~

Ii I JI::;;;::
1 .; ti
!lilil iilillillllll!i II ll•l~\IIIH:111 Iii
:11111.l i I iH!ilil li:·11:li i H ;:1:1: 111111111 ::1 illHi 1:111::
1 1 1 HI 11 :i ;: il!ilil !il i :111:1 i : ilili Ii iIilJH I IIll!! II1:
-liliilllilliiilil!i!lilllll ili!IJl;liilllllll■Hllil i lil il .
,;;:. ;•::: :::;:; liiiililll ii lliiiil i i ::::.::~:::::::w
!/i~i!;
N

··········
.....•.·· :•:•:•:•.•:•:•:•:•:•.•····
•.·.·.•,:.·.·······•:•:•:•
•:•:•:•:•: ···············•
•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•
0

TOTAL ASSESSED VALUE

••••••••••••••••••••• •••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••• ••••••••••••••••••••••••••

1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

. . • --~ .

.

1985

:•

:::::::::

;

;

:•'❖"❖'❖ '❖'•··············

············· ··················

:::::••.••••

•.!.•-•'• •••• ••'• ••••••••••• •'

·:::• .:....:::

1986

COMMERCIAL ASSESSED VALUE
INDUSTRIAL ASSESSED VALUE

················ UTILITY ASSESSED VALUE

1987

1988

PROPERTY VALUE HISTORY
CITY OF FLAT ROCK

RESIDENTIAL ASSESSED VALUE

Figure 1
Source: City Assessment Record

�rI.. ,

r-

~

•

!

I,_

The slopes of the lines in Figure 1 depicting total assessed value and industrial
assessed value are very similar, reflecting the impact of industry on the
economic well-being of the City. During the nine-year period covered in Figure
1, the assessed value of residential, commercial, and utility properties remained
nearly level.
·

[-_
l_-

The impact of various classes of property on total land value is indicated in
Table 13. Residential real property accounts for greatest proportion of the total
equalized value, about 57 percent. According to the 1988 land use survey,
residential land uses occupy 17.5 percent of the total land area in the City.
A large proportion of the vacant lands in the City, however, are also considered
residential properties for the purposes of tax assessment.
TABLE 13
VALUE OF CLASSES OF PROPERTY (1988)

r

Equalized Value of Real
and Personal Property ($000)

I

I-

Commercial
Industrial
Residential
Utility
Source:

$18,717
8,739
40,409
3,049

Class Value as a
Percent of Total SEV
26.4%

12.3
57.0
4.3

Records of the City Assessor

Commercial real and personal property accounts for the next highest proportion
of the total equalized value, about 26.4 percent. Commercial land uses occupy
about 2.7 percent of the total land area. Thus, commercial uses provide a fairly
high return in comparison to the amount of land occupied.

i

'
l·-·

[__

[

:

The return is not nearly as great for industrial uses, which account for 12.3
percent of the total equalized value.· Even though industrial uses currently
account for about half as much of the state equalized value as commercial uses,
industrial uses occupy almost four times as much land area. Given current
conditions, the figures in Table 13 indicate that industrial land use is the
least cost-efficient use of land in the City. This assessment does not take into
account other benefits from industry, though, such as job creation and state
generated funds.
The decline in property values and tax revenues has forced the City to reduce
expenditures and limit the expansion of public services. Table 14 and Figure
2 indicate the irregular year-to-year changes in the general fund budget, a
result of the adjustments made necessary because of declining property tax
revenues. The largest percentage decrease in the general fund budget, a decrease
of 17.1 percent, was recorded in 1983. The budget declined in every year except
- 46 -

�one between 1983 and 1987.
a 10.4 percent increase.

This decreasing pattern was reversed in 1988 with

TABLE 14
BUDGET HISTORY

Year

General Fund Budget

Percent Change

1989*

$2,500,575

+ 2.2%

1988

2,445,910

+10.4

1987

2,215,498

- 2.9

1986

2,280,531

- 1.3

1985

2,309,476

- 1. 2

1984

2,282,014

+ 2.8

1983

2,218,856

-17.1

1982

2,676,665

+18.7

1981

2,254,5~4

- 1. 7

1980

2,293,228

Source: Treasurer, City of Flat Rock
* 1989 Estimate by Williams, Herbert &amp;Jocks

l
l
[

r

1,
I

In summary, largely due to the decline in industrial property values there was
a subsequent substant1al decrease in tax revenue. The loss in revenue imposed
severe constraints on the normal operations of the City, caused by cutbacks in
the budgets~ The pattern of decreasing tax revenues and budgets was finally
reversed in 1988.
The analysis presented in this chapter indicates that
opportunities for continued economic growth exist, particularly in the following
areas:
- Commercial growth is expected to occur in three locations: along Telegraph
Road, downtown, and in the Gateway Commerce Center. Telegraph Road north of
the railroad tracks will continue to develop as the primary retail and service
district in the City. A mixture of specialty retail, office, and service uses,
as we 11 as resident i a1 deve 1opment is expected downtown. Because of its
location adjacent to I-75, regionally-oriented planned mixed use development
is most appropriate for Gateway Commerce Center.
- 47 -

�r -·}

r~

I

·1

,- --

·---,

,--·--;

!7

--i

~

..

. •,~i

,.

r-- .-,. i

,

::-~---1

2,800 - - - - - -

~

2,600
2,400

"'11.:111111::1•1111111

2,200

: i:

2,000

1,800
_
0
0
0

fh

1,600

1,400

• i I•

1•:1 •11:11•:

:1• 1!!••

!II!! ! 1:1 •: I

1 •:1 ll!il 1■1~1111111111111! 1J!Ji!l l lil !il !lil

&lt;C

_J
_J

•.iH•.•··••1~;;1

1••1!•1;~·T·

r· 1·r·· 1·
1

''

1,200

11 •n mrnm

11•

1•11111:1 !I•11• il!l!I!! 11 •1111,::r

Ii 111 !l!lllll!il!llll!IJ•liiw

0
0

:11

.1Biilllllilllillil!illi11!1il•!l!ll!l!l•!!llllll■ll!l-llli•l1illl

( /)

a:

:: 11•:Hli:lll!l !I!

1,000
800

600
400

200
0
1980

1981

1982

1983

1984

1985

1986

1987

1988

1'989

BUDGET AND PROPERTY TAX HISTORY
e ·1TY OF FLAT ROCK

Figure 2
Source: City Treasurer

�- In addition to downtown, which serves as the current office center for Flat
Rock, office development would be appropriate in the Gateway Commerce Center
and along Gibraltar Road, west of Olmstead Road. The development of welldesigned and lands caped office uses along Gibraltar Road would create a
pleasing entranceway to the City. From a land use perspective, office uses
would be more compatible with surrounding residential and institutional uses
than strip commercial development.
- Future industrial development would be suitable in three general locations.
Because of the design and location of the building, the former Ford Motor
company industrial plant on Gibraltar Road at I-75 is the single most
prominent opportunity for manufacturing/heavy industrial development. Light
industrial, research, and warehousing uses would be appropriate in the Gateway
Commerce Center i ndust rial park and al so as a buffer along Ha 11 Road and
Vreeland Road, to separate future residential development from Mazda and the
Grand Trunk railroad yard.

I

l
[

I

' .

l-

,.
l.·

[
[
r-l.

r·

- 49 -

�CIRCULATION ANALYSIS
I-

Overview

The local network of streets and thoroughfares is of vital importance for the
overall well-being of the City and its residents. The most basic function of
local streets is to provide a circulation system by which people and goods can
move within and through the City.
Roads and road rights-of-way also provide locations for public utilities, such
as water, sewer, gas, electric, and telephone lines. Roads provide the means
by which emergency and public services are delivered to residents. Road rightsof-way provide locations for landscaping and parking along commercial strips.
Most important, the road system establishes the basic form and character of the
City.
As described in the Existing Land Use component of this plan, the development
of the City has been shaped by the location or, in some cases, the absence of
transportation corridors. The impact of Telegraph Road on commercial development
is particularly evident. While early commercial development was concentrated
in a central business district near the riverfront, commercial development in
more recent times has occurred in strips along the full length of Telegraph Road.
At the same time, the absence of roads in the central and northwestern portions
of the City has resulted in little or no development in these areas.
In summary, because the local road network serves many functions, this network
has a significant impact on the local economy, character, environmental quality,
development, and the overall well-being of the City. It is important, therefore,
to identify and understand deficiencies in the circulation system, and to prepare
alternatives to address those deficiencies.
Jurisdiction of Roads

The roads within the City of Flat Rock are under the jurisdiction of three
agencies: the Michigan Department of Transportation (MOOT), the Wayne County
Office of Public Services, and the City of Flat Rock.
State Trunkline System. The state trunkline system serves as the regional road
network for the City and County. MOOT has jurisdiction over this system, which
in Flat Rock consists of I-75 and US-24 (Telegraph Road). Although MOOT oversees
planning and major improvements to the trunkline system, it contracts with the
County for general maintenance services. A more complete description of this
regional network follows:
- I-75 is the primary north-south freeway through the region, providing a link
to the Detroit and Toledo metropolitan areas as well as locations farther
north and south.
This highway has been described as the state's most
important industrial corridor. In Flat Rock, an interchange with I-75 is
located at Gibraltar Road.
- 50 -

�- US-24 (Telegraph Road) provides an alternate north-south route to the Detroit
and Toledo metropolitan areas. Telegraph Road serves dual purposes as a
carrier of through traffic as well as providing access to abutting commercial
properties.
- I-275 . intersects with Will-Carleton Road approximately four miles west of
Flat Rock city limits. This freeway provides direct access to expanding
markets and employment opportunities in the western suburbs of Detroit and
in Washtenaw County.
Overall, the state trunkl ine system provides excellent north-south transportation
for City residents. The north-south orientation of regional circulation system
has affected business, employment, shopping patterns, and the local economy in
general. The circulation system facilitates interaction with businesses in the
Detroit or Toledo metropolitan areas, rather than with businesses to the west.
The east-west regional transportation network is less than adequate. The closest
east-west freeway routes are I-94 to the north and M-50 in Monroe County.
County and City Roads. A network of county and city roads provides for local
circulation within the City of Flat Rock. Gibraltar Road, Huron River Drive,
Will-Carleton Road, and Inkster Road are under the jurisdiction of the County.
All other roads are under the jurisdiction of the City.
In general, the local circulation system radiates out from the original central
business district (CBD), which is located in the southwestern portion of the
City. In the eastern and northern portions of the City, the road network takes
the form of a grid pattern which is typical of the county road system. In these
outer areas of the City, the road network is sparse, and there are large tracts
of undeveloped land. Transportation to the west of the CBD is limited to a
single crossing over the Huron River at Telegraph Road.

I.
I

The Grand Trunk Rail road runs from northeast to southwest through the City,
connecting with a large rail classification yard in the northeast part of the
City. This railroad is a formidable barrier to the construction of new roads
across the central portions of the City.

Road Classifications
The purpose served by each road or highway in the circulation system is best
described through classification of the roads. Road classifications identify
the type and volume of traffic that is- appropriate for each segment of the road
network.
The classifications establish expectations among residents, City
officials,
and transportation engineers concerning the operational
characteristics of each road.
For the purpose of future transportation planning in Flat Rock, a functional
classification of roads has been developed. This system includes the following
road classes (see Map 2):
- 51 -

�[

I

I ..

V~'I ,,

,.
,,

,;

,,
,:
",,,,

~---: :____.

-T ;, r·~7

::I I I i I

'I

::,;

I !•··.I!
; : ,.; I I
;i II

::

'·::

'

I

LEGEND

•~'.--...........,/
~

---FREEWAY

I

--

\?',

;

I

'

~

~--~~&gt;
' ,'

- - - PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL

I

:.;; , /I/.

- - - - - - MINOR ARTERIAL

.fl

t .,

I

it.Lr\,_

===LOCAL

I

FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF ROADS

~

MAP 2

■ ■

CITY OF FLAT ROCK ■ ■
MICHIGAN ■
■ WAYNE COUNTY

m

■

nortn

I. .80__.0l_,eo
. .......ol _3_r.~?.....l _ _::._.~:i
scale

··--··-· c.,- ....... -

M~K.eMa Associates, Incorporated

Comniunity Pleming • Urban Desion
Farmington Hills, M1chioan

_-_--.....

�.

•'

- Freeways. Freeways are designed to handle large volumes of traffic moving
at high speeds over long distances or between urban areas. As noted, the
principal freeway serving the City of Flat Rock is I-75, which, in the
vicinity of the City, carries about 44,000 vehicles per day.
Principal arterials. Principal arterial roads and highways serve the major
centers of activity. With the exception of freeways, principal arterials
provide for the highest traffic volumes and the longest trips. Principal
arterials allow for major traffic movement within the City and region. The
City of Flat Rock has four principal arterial roads: Telegraph Road (average
daily traffic (ADT): 22,200 vehicles), Gibraltar Road, Will Carleton Road, and
Vreeland Road.

II.

- Mi nor arterials.
Mi nor arteri a1 roads interconnect with the pri nc i pa 1
arterial system and provide trips of moderate length and a lower level of
traffic mobility. Minor arterial roads place more emphasis on land access
than principal arterials. Minor arterials in Flat Rock include Huron River
Drive, Hall Road, Olmstead Road, Arsenal Road, Inkster Road, and Garden
Boulevard.
- Local roads. Local roads primarily provide direct access to abutting land
and to collector and arterial streets. Movement of through traffic is usually
discouraged on local roads. Local roads in Flat Rock include minor roads in
the central business district and local subdivision roads.
Public Act 51 Classification System. Wayne County utilizes a road classification
system to establish funding priorities in accordance with Michigan Public Act
51 of 1951 (see Map 3). Under the Act 51 classification system, principal and
minor arterials are generally classified as State Trunklines, County Primary
Roads or Major City Streets,- depending on agency jurisdiction over the road.
The remaining roads are generally classified as Local City Streets, with the
exception of streets in the CBD. Streets within the CBD qualify for Act 51
funding, and therefore, receive the classification of Major City Streets.

Circulation System Deficiencies

l.
Ir__

The status of the local road system has important consequences in terms of the
future land use plan. An inadequate road system can impact on whether the City
achieves its development objectives. For example, the lack of good access to
some areas of the City has prevented desired residential, commercial, and
industrial development. In other areas, continued development without necessary
road improvements will result in increasing congestion and traffic conflict on
local streets. Described below are circulation system deficiencies within the
City:
Telegraph Road. Telegraph Road is an example of a road which is experiencing
increasing congestion and traffic conflict. Strip commercial development has
occurred along the road, generating local business traffic. At the same time,
Telegraph Road is utilized as a regional thoroughfare for longer through trips
- 53 -

�I-

I_

,-----

...... ;:
,,

---

~~=--

LEGEND
- - - STATE TRUNKLINE
• • - • - • - COUNTY PRIMARY

n,1111111111_ COUNTY LOCAL

I~

- - - MAJOR CITY STREET

l

===

LOCAL CITY STREET

- - - ADJOINING CITY STREET

f
i

I .

I·

ST A TE COUNTY
&amp; LOCAL ROAD CLASSIFICATION*
*Based on Michigan Public Act 51 of 1851

■

■

MAP 3

■

CITY OF FLAT ROCK ■ ■
MICHIGAN ■
WAYNE COUNTY
■

m
no&lt;lh

scale
800 1600

3200
feet

one
mile

M!tKeMa Associates. tncorporated
Convnurvty Plal'Y"ling • Urban Des,gn
Farmington Hills, Michigan

�I

•

L

by vehicular and truck traffic. As a result, conflicts have arisen between local
business traffic which generates many turning movements, high-speed through
traffic, and relatively slower and cumbersome truck traffic. These conflicts
will intensify as the commercial district along Telegraph Road continues to
expand.
Circulation in the CBD. A key transportation deficiency in the Central Business
District is the lack of a direct link between Gibraltar Road and Telegraph Road.
Following Gibraltar Road all the way through the CBD to Telegraph Road might seem
a logical route. However, there are no directional signs along the route, nor
is there a traffic signal at the Gibraltar/Telegraph intersection to facilitate
turning movements onto Telegraph.

I.

Need for Access Roads. There are several large tracts of vacant land in Flat
Rock which are suitable for new development, particularly for high-quality single
family homes, but which are inaccessible from the existing road network. These
areas include a large tract of land located between Cahill Road and the CBD, an
area south of the Cahill/Gibraltar intersection, and land areas both east and
west of Arsenal Road.
Need for Collector Roads. As new residential development occurs in the City,
a residential street system wi 11 develop to pro vi de access for these areas.
Subsequently, there will be a need for new "collector roads" to channel traffic
from the local residential streets to arterial roads. Collector roads are
generally wider than other residential roads. Efforts are made, where possible,
to discourage direct residential access onto collector roads, since the added
curb cuts increase traffic conflicts and congestion. Homes which do front on
collector roads should be set back an ample distance from the roadway.

I.

I

l.

Grand Trunk Railroad. A constraint to the development of new roads in Flat Rock
is the presence of the Grand Trunk Railroad classification yard. The rail road
is a physical barrier that makes it very difficult to provide east-west road
connections between the central and western portion of the City. - Improvements
to the railroad crossings at Vreeland Road will be very important in order to
facilitate better traffic flow along the only east-west road in the northern
portions of the City.
Pavement of Roads.
Not only is there a need to provide access roads to
underdeveloped areas of the City, but there is a need to pave certain existing
roads. Unpaved roads in the City include Woodruff Road, Cahill Road, Meadows
Avenue, Seneca Avenue, Peters and several roads in residential subdivisions.

l[

Delivery of Community Services. Currently deficiencies in the City's existing
overall road system frustrate the delivery of community services. For -example,
the presence of unpaved roads and lack of collector streets has made it difficult
for local officials to identify safe and appropriate school bus routes and
student transfer stations. In the future, as City road network is improved,
special effort must be made to accommodate school buses, fire trucks, trash
collection truck, ambulances and other service vehicles.

[:.
- 55 -

�Opportunities for Improvement
Following are possible solutions to road system deficiencies in the City of Flat
Rock (refer to Map 4):
Access Roads for Residential Development. The opportunity exists to provide
road access to vacant areas east and west of Arsenal Road by extending
Vreeland Road west to Inkster Road. Other undeveloped areas of the City may
be accessed by extending Seneca east to Cahill, extending Cahill south to
Woodruff, and connecting Meadows Avenue east and west from 01 mstead to
Tamarack. These road extensions could become future collector roads as
residential development in the vicinity expands. The exact location of these
road extensions could vary depending on topography, location of drains and
wetlands, the need to align new roads with existing roads, proposals for new
development, and similar conditions.

r·

I

!~

- Downtown Circulation. Traffic circulation in the CBD may be improved by
designating Gibraltar Road as the primary route for through traffic,
connecting traffic from the east to Telegraph Road. Traffic- flow along
Gibraltar could be facilitated by installing a traffic signal at the
Telegraph/Gibraltar intersection, and by making adjustments at the
Gibraltar/Garden Boulevard intersection which would allow non-stop traffic
movement along Gibraltar.
Telegraph Road Commercial Area. To reduce congestion and traffic conflict,
the site plan review process should be used to control the number of curb
cuts onto Telegraph Road. Developers should be encouraged to construct
secondary access drives to serve a11 of the properties, thereby reducing
turning movements on Telegraph Road. For example, traffic safety on Telegraph
Road could be improved by constructing a secondary service drive behind the
existing -business along the east side of Telegraph Road, thereby providing an
alternate access off of Vreeland Road for patrons of Kmart and adjoining
businesses.

iI •

Truck Routes. Conflicts between truck and vehicular traffic could be reduced
by encouraging trucks to use Hall Road as the primary north-south truck route,
and Vreeland Road as the primary east-west truck route. For non-industrial
traffic, Cahill should become the primary north-south roµte, and Gibraltar
Road should become the primary east-west route.

L

- Pavement of Roads. As the City grows, developers should be required to pave
all proposed roads. In addition, there are existing roads which may never
be paved without public funds, which the City could pave to provide a catalyst
for development. The following roads should receive priority for paving with
public funds: Cahill Road, Seneca Road, Woodruff Drive, and Meadows Avenue
east of Tamarack.
-

[_·
f -

I

Improved Access to School. After Woodruff Drive is paved and Meadows Avenue
is connected east to Olmstead, improved access to the Flat Rock elementary and
middle schools should be developed. Tamarack Street should be phased out as
the primary access to the schools, and a direct route which does not cut
through a residential neighborhood should be developed.

I ·"'

- 56 -

�I.

,1

I

LEGEND
.' I

:- -'_5~:

FREEWAY

, .j ,.,. . ',._

_j:_ :·_: /-

- - - • PRINCIPAL ARTERIAL

~ L=.- -

• • - • - • • PROPOSED PRINCIPAL
ARTERIAL

0

- - - MINOR ARTERIAL
1111,n111111111111111n1111

===

-$--

FUTURE COLLECTOR
STREET

'\ 1-\,,t/,

"'-------..

TRAFFIC SIGNAL

• - - - - - SERVICE DRIVE

~ POSSIBLE TRAFFIC

W

LOCAL STREET

□

- - - PROPOSED TRUCK
ROUTES

-""'

~c....- -·\_

INTERSECTION
IMPROVEMENTS

SIGNAL (Long-term)

~ STREET CLOSING

RAILROAD CROSSING
IMPROVEMENTS

11iiilliiiiilihiiiihiiiiiii0 PRIORITY ROAD PAVING
(Future Collector Street)

COMPREHENSIVE CIRCULATION PLAN

MAP 4

■ ■
I

I

l:

CITY OF FLAT ROCK ■ ■
■ WAYNE COUNTY
MICHIGAN ■
■

m
north

scale
800 1800

320 0
feet

one
mile

MS:Kenna Associates, lncor0orated
Community Planning • Urba n De sign
Farmington Hills. M1chtgan

�Improved transportation patterns are also required at
Currently, school bus loading and unloading blocks access
and hinders the flow traffic on other streets. Ideally, an
area for buses should be developed, possibly making it
school to acquire more property.

the high
to certain
off-street
necessary

school.
streets
staging
for the

Improved Access to Cook Road Industrial Area. Industries located along Cook
Road do not have direct access to Telegraph Road. Consequently, trucks
serving this industrial district must travel through residential areas. An
alternate means of access to this area is required. Two alternatives are
possible:
I) Construction of a new road to Telegraph Road, or
2)
Construction of an access road along the railroad tracks to Vreeland Road.
I

I
Pedestrian Movement
As the City continues to deve 1op, the need to accommodate pedestrians wi 11
increase in importance. A pedestrian orientation was established in the older
portions of the City through construction of sidewalks along most streets. This
pattern should be continued in newly developed areas, using a two-fold approach,
as follows:
First, developers should be required to install sidewalks along all road rightsof-way in conjunction with all new construction. Second, the City should become
directly involved in the installation of sidewalks if the following circumstances
exist.
- Pedestrian/vehicle conflicts are prevalent.
It would be beneficial to provide access to key centers of community activity,
such as to parks or libraries.
It is necessary to complete the missing links in an area where much of the
pathway system has been installed.
1·

Priorities for installation of new sidewalks in Flat Rock should include the
following: missing links along Telegraph Road, missing links in the downtown
{particularly in the vicinity of the new senior housing complex), a new sidewalk
along Woodruff Drive from Olmstead to Huron River Drive, and sidewalks along both
sides of Gibraltar Road between the CBD and Gateway Commerce Park.

[.
[_

- 58 -

�[

COMMUNITY AND RECREATION FACILITIES
The responsibility for providing public services to the residents of Flat Rock
is shared by several public entities, including the City itself, various Wayne
County departments, various state agencies, the Fl at Rock Community School
District and other organizations. These services play an important role in
determining the quality of life within the City. During the coming years, as
vacant land areas within the City are developed and the number of residents in
the City increases, the demand for public services will also increase. This
chapter of the Master Plan examines the public facilities and services within
the City and looks at ways to expand these resources to meet the needs of a
growing City.

City Administration and Services
Following is a description of existing municipal facilities (see Table 15 and
Map 5):
City Hall

r·

!
I

City Hall represents a major focal point within the City of Flat Rock, occupying
a five acre site located on Gibraltar Road near Evergreen Street. The facility
contains a number of civic and governmental activities including the general City
offices, council chambers, and police, fire, and public works departments. Built
in 1975, the building itself is an impressive two-story structure, containing
a total of 45,500 square feet of floor space. It is anticipated that the
existing structure will provide adequate capacity for City administrative needs
for the foreseeable future. The only drawback of the building is that it is
not energy efficient; measures to mitigate this deficiency are required.
The site on which City Hall is located is highly visible, centrally situated
within the community, and surrounded on two sides by Flat Rock Community Park.
These characteristics, coupled with adequate space on the site for additional
construction, presents the opportunity to develop the site as the civic center
for the community. As additional library space, meeting rooms, and other
facilities become necessary within the City (such needs are described below),
these facilities should be constructed adjacent to City Hall. This will allow
for the integration of local civic activities, and enhance City Hall as a focal
point of the City.
Senior Center/ Public Works Garage

The City owns and maintains a Senior Citizen Center, which is housed in the old
Public Works Building on West Huron River Drive north of Arsenal Road. Built
in 1926, the building is approximately 1,200 square feet in size and is in fair
condition. The building contains meeting room space and kitchen facilities which
are utilized for senior activities. The City continues to improve the facility
each year, rehabilitating the structure itself and remodeling its interior.
Window restoration and energy efficiency measures are currently needed.
- 59 -

�I

I

I

'. ~

- · .-

Municipal Facilities
1. CITY HALL
2. SENIOR CENTER/PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING
3. YOUTH CENTER
4. LIBRARY
5. ABANDONED WATER TREATMENT PLANT
6. ABANDONED SEWAGE TREATMENT PLANT (OWned by County)

0

Municipal Recreation
7. HU ROC PARK
8. FLAT ROCK COMMUNITY PARK
9. PEBBLE BROOK PARK
10. POTENTIAL RECREATION

0

·1

Public School Facilities
11. FLAT ROCK HIGH
12. BOBCEAN ELEMENTARY
13. UNDEVELOPED PROPERTY
14. SIMPSON JUNIOR HIGH
15. BARNES ELEMENTARY
16. SCHOOL-OWNED PLAYGROUND

□

■

'I
LJ./\
'\.._..,,,..,._

Regional Recreation
17. OAKWOODS METROPARK
18. POTENTIAL RECREATION

COMMUNITY &amp; RECREATION FACILITIES
■

..r .,f'
~ l ·/;".
W

~;,.

MAP 5

■

CITY OF FLAT ROCK ■ ■
MICHIGAN ■
WAYNE COUNTY
■

north

scale

I
L

~

J.-_____3r_:_....~l ___:1.r. . .l W

~--s-:....t_-so....

~enna Aasoclatea. Incorporated
Conm.nty Pia,...,,,_ • Urban Design
Farmington Hills, Michigan

�TABLE 15
MUNICIPAL FACILITIES

City Hall Complex, 25500 Gibraltar Road, 5 Acres
City Administration, Police, Fire and Public Works Department; 45,500 sq. ft.;
built in 1975; good condition, although modifications are required to make it
more energy-efficient.
I

Library, 26336 East Huron Drive, 0.2 Acres

I .

City-leased facility for ·library services, 5,600 sq. ft., built in 1978,
maintained in good condition.

I.

Senior Citizen Center/ Public Works Building, 26643 West Huron Drive, 0.3 Acres
Senior Citizen Center, 1,200 sq. ft., built in 1926, fair condition (requires
window restoration, energy efficiency measures, and remodeling).
Public Works Building, 3,200 sq. ft., built in 1954, good condition.
Sewage Treatment Plant, East Huron River Drive, 1.21 Acres
Sewage Treatment Plant, closed -- to be demolished.
I

Youth Center, located at Hu Roe Park

i

I

I.

I
i

il

I.

Youth Center Building, 1,500 sq. ft., built in 1957; average condition (requires
new roof, boiler, general modernization).
The new senior housing complex, located on Telegraph Road in the central business
district, contains a meeting room for senior activities.
While this facility
will bolster programs available to senior citizens within the City, it will not
replace existing programs. The City should continue to improve and maintain the
existing Senior Citizen Center on East Huron River Drive as a site for ongoing
senior programs.
The Senior Citizen Center shares the same site with the City Public Works Garage,
which houses mechanic facilities for repair of city vehicles. This building is
3,200 square feet in size and is in good condition.

r

!
L

- 61 -

�Youth Center
The City owns and maintains a Youth Center located on Atwater Street in Hu Roe
Park. The Youth Center contains a meeting room, kitchen facilities, and storage
space. It is utilized by local youth groups, such as the boy scouts and girl
scouts, and by community groups which are youth-oriented. Built in 1957, the
Youth Center is in average condition. Currently, the building needs a new roof
and boiler and general modernization. The kitchen cannot be used for cooking,
because as it does not meet County Health Department standards.
Eventually, when new community meeting facilities are constructed behind City
Ha 11, the Youth Center wi 11 cease to be a primary meeting space for the
community. The City may continue to maintain the Youth Center as secondary
meeting facilities, or remove the Youth Center to enhance the natural setting
of Hu Roe Park.
Library

The local Library is centrally located at 26336 East Huron Drive in downtown Flat ·
Rock. The building itself, which is leased by the City, contains 5,600 square
feet of floor space, and is maintained in good condition. The City of Flat Rock
is a member of the Wayne/Oakland Federation, a cooperative in southeast Michigan
consisting of approximately 60 libraries. The library located in Flat Rock is
financed by Flat Rock, Gibraltar, Rockwood, Brownstown Township, and Huron
Township. The hiring of personnel is handled by Wayne County.
According to library officials, the existing library is adequate for the current
needs of the community. In the long-term, the City hopes that a new 1ibrary
facility will be built behind the City Hall, as part of the City's civic center.
11

I-

f-

I

Police

The City Police Department operates out of the City Hall. The department has
a 19-person force, including the chief, 12 uniformed road officers, 2 detectives,
a narcotics officer, and 3 shift commanders. While the department has ample
space in City Hall for its operations, there is a need for additional office
support in terms of equipment and personnel. The department has a fleet of 4
marked and 2 unmarked police vehicles, which is adequate to service the City.
The City has 911 dialing service for emergencies, but does not have the capacity
to automatically identify the number and location of emergency calls.
The Michigan State Police maintains a post within the City of Flat Rock, located
at the intersection of Will Carleton Drive and Telegraph Road. This is a central
location for state patrol of the 1-275 and 1-75 Freeways. There has been some
consideration given to moving this post to a new location north of Flat Rock;
however, at this time, State funds have not been appropriated for such a move.

l . .•

Fire Department
The City has a voluntary Fire Department which operates out of City Hall. Fire
trucks are stationed at City Hall and at the Public Works Garage on West Huron
River Drive. The City Fire Department provides fire protection and ambulance
service for all City residents (seven minute maximum response time). When
- 62 -

�requested, the Department has a mutual agreement to provide services to
surrounding communities.
The department's equipment is in generally good
condition; the City has recently purchased two new fire trucks. The department
is, however, in need of an aerial bucket. Currently, there are 37 volunteers
on the Flat Rock Fire Squad.

Public Utilities
Public Water Service

The City of Flat Rock owns and maintains the local public water distribution
system which services all developed areas within the City. Water is supplied
from the City of Detroit. Major water mains into the City lie along G"braltar,
Vreeland, and Woodruff Roads. The system is in generally good condition. There
is a need to replace some undersized lines within the older central portion of
the City, and to replace lines within the system which are subject to breakage
(ie. along Huron River Drive, Arsenal Road, Moses Road). Additional improvements
are needed to allow system looping in some areas of the City, which would improve
water pressure.
·

l

'-·

According to City officials, the water system has adequate capacity to meet the
needs of future development on the City's remaining vacant land. The system is
also adequate for the purposes of fire protection throughout the City.
Sanitary Sewer Service

Flat Rock also owns and maintains the sanitary sewers in the City. Sewage is
treated at the South Huron Valley Wastewater Control System located in the
Township of Brownstown. · The treatment facility is operated by Wayne County,
but is owned by seven communities, each of which is allocated a portion of the
total treatment capacity of the plant. The City of Flat Rock itself owns the
capacity to treat 2.77 million gallons per day.
l-

Currently, the City sends approximately 2 million gallons of sewage to the
treatment plant each day. The remaining available treatment capacity owned by
the City could serve approximately 600 additional homes. The City, therefore,
does not own the capacity to provide sanitary sewer service a population of 9,486
persons, which is the projected population for Flat Rock in the Year 2005. If
the City Master Plan is to be implemented, the City must seek additional sewage
treatment capacity. At this time, there are no plans to expand the treatment
plant in Brownstown, and there appears to be little possibility that Flat Rock
will be able to purchase existing capacity from another municipality.
The City's old sewage treatment plant (which is owned by Wayne County) is located
on East Huron River Drive in the vicinity of Van Riper Street. This plant was
closed in 1988 because of obsolescence. The abandoned plant will be demolished.
Storm Sewers
The City of Flat Rock contains enclosed storm drains scattered throughout the
City. All combined storm/sanitary sewers, which once existed in the older
central portions of the City, were separated during the l960's and 1970's. All
- 63 -

�•.

r-.
'

I

'

-

r-·

enclosed storm water and surface water ronoff from City land areas discharges
into the Huron River, either directly or via open drains.
Improved drainage is required on some of the vacant lands that have been
identified as suitable for residential development. It is recommended that the
City undertake a system-wide stormwater study, possibly in cooperation with
surrounding communities, to determine solutions to the stormwater drainage
problems.

School Facilities

[._
r-

il

The Flat Rock Community School District operates four schools within the City
of Flat Rock. Flat Rock High School is located on a 5.4 acre site north of the
Gibraltar Road/Garden Boulevard intersection. Simpson Junior High (33.4 acre~)
and Barnes Elementary (9.7 acres) are located north and south of Carter Street
respectively, east of Tamarack Road. Bobcean Elementary is located north of
Seneca, west of Evergreen. The School District also owns a 55.8 acre site north
of the City Hall which is now vacant, and a 0.8 acre site near Dover Street (in
the southeast portion of the City) which is used as a neighborhood park. The
District's administration building is located on the same site as the High
School.
According to school officials, K-12 enrollment in Flat Rock has fluctuated during
recent years. At this time, local school facilities are operating a full
capacity.
If enrollment grows appreciably over the next few years, the
construction of additions to the two existing elementary school buildings will
be needed. Currently, there is ample land at both elementary schools for such
additions.
School officials hope to eventually construct a new high school and
library/resource center on the school-owned property behind City Hall. From the
standpoint of city-wide planning, this is an excellent proposal; for it would
reinforce the City Hall and surrounding properties as the center for civic
activities in Flat Rock. Adequate space could be provided at the new high school
for vehicular parking and the transfer of students between buses, which would
alleviate some of the traffic problems now occurring at the existing high school
site.
The existing high school building could be converted into a
vocational/special education center.

Parks and Recreation
Inventory of Existing Facilities
As listed in Table 16, the City owns and maintains three parks, comprising a
total of 38.3 acres of parkland.
r

I

I

The largest City park is Hu Roe Park (27.4 acres) which is located along the
Huron River south of the Grand Truck Railroad. A large portion of the park is,
in fact, located on an island, and access is provided via a footbridge. Hu Roe

L.

- 64 ,--

�TABLE 16
PARKS AND RECREATION FACILITIES
PROPERTY INVENTORY

Site Size

(Acres)

Hu Roe Park

27.4

Footbridge, picnic areas, benches, fishing.

Flat Rock
Community Park

10.7

Two (2) lighted softball fields, two (2)
tennis courts, playground equipment, picnic
areas with grills, pavilion, restrooms,
storage shed, water fountain, caboose.

Pebble Brook Park

I.

0.2

Tot lot, benches.

5.4

One (1) baseball diamond, football field,
soccer field, gymnasium, weight room.

Public Schools
Flat Rock
High School

33.4

Two (2) baseball/softball diamonds, running
track, soccer field, six (6) tennis courts,
sledding hills, indoor pool, gymnasium.

Barnes Elementary

9.7

One (1) softball diamond, soccer field, play
equipment, gymnasium.

Bobcean Elementary

9.1

Two (2) baseball/softball diamonds, play
equipment, gymnasium.

Playground near
Dover Street

9.8

Ball diamond.

Simpson Junior
High School
I .

Facilities

City Parks

I

Huron-Clinton
Metro Authority

r;
1·

Oakwoods Metropark

35.5

Natural area (portion of larger park).

Property north of
Will Carleton Drive

31.0

Undeveloped, leased by the City.

-.

[

·

- 65 -

�r -

'

Park contains picnic areas and benches along the river. The park is used
extensively for fishing and other forms of passive recreation. The park is also
the site of the City's annual July 4th celebration and other community events.
Located adjacent to City Hall on a 10.7 acre site is Flat Rock Community Park.
This park contains two lighted softball diamonds, tennis courts, playground
equipment, picnic areas, a pavilion, and restrooms. It is used extensively by
City residents for active recreation.
Pebble Brook Park is a 0.2 acre site located at the end of Todd Street in the
southeast portion of the City. Pebble Brook Park contains a tot lot and benches.
The Flat Rock Community School District is also a major provider of recreation
services within the City. The District owns 57.6 acres of land at four school
sites. Recreation facilities located on these sites include 5 ball diamonds,
6 tennis courts, 4 gymnasiums, a soccer field, running track, play equipment,
and an indoor pool. Although these facilities are designed to meet the needs
of school children, the facilities are made available to all residents when not
being used for school purposes.
The School District and the City of Flat Rock together employ a full-time
director for local adult education and recreation programs.
The director
coordinates a full range of recreation programs for all age groups including
organized baseball, softball, track, basketball, soccer and "safety-town" (for
children). The director also coordinates adult education programs and many of
the Senior Citizen activities. Over 1,000 people participated in these programs
during the 1988/89 year; the age of participants ranged from 2 to 85 years.
The southern 35 acres of the Oakwoods Metropark 1i es within Fl at Rock City
limits, located west of the Huron River and north of the Grand Trunk Railroad.
This park is owned and operated by the Huron-Clinton Metropolitan Authority
(HCMA). Recreation facilities available at the park (although not located within
City limits) include picnicking, fishing, hiking, canoeing, and cross-country
skiing. The portion of Oakwoods Metropark which lies within the City is a
designated nature study area.

II.
I
I_

The HCMA owns an additional 31 acre site within the City of Flat Rock which is
undeveloped. The site is located immediately west of the Huron River, south of
the Grand Trunk Railroad, with access to Will Carleton Road. The City currently
leases this property from HCMA and is considering developing the property as a
campground. A footbridge over the Huron River to the City's Hu Roe Park could
be provided.
There are three other metroparks located within 10 miles of the City of Flat
Rock, which are managed by the HCMA. These parks offer swimming, boating,
golfing, camping, and ice skating facilities. Throughout the entire southeast
Michigan metropolitan area, there are a total of 13 metroparks operated by HCMA.
Each metropark offers a variety of recreation opportunities, and all are located
within a one-hour drive from Flat Rock.
The Mi chi gan Department of Natura 1 Resources (MDNR) operates Sterling State Park,
approximately 20 miles south of Flat Rock, on the shore of Lake Erie near the
- 66 -

�1-75/Dixie Highway interchange.
This 1,000-acre park is one of the most
frequently visited state parks in Michigan.
Park Classification

For planning and management purposes, parks can be classified based on the type
of facility and expected use. The parks in Flat Rock may be classified as
follows:
- Mini-Parks. Mini-parks are small, specialized parks, usually less than an
acre in size, that serve the needs of residents in the surrounding
neighborhood. A mini-park may contain a children's playlot, serve as a
greenbelt, or provide a sitting area for senior citizens. The retommended
service area for mini-parks is a 1/4 mile radius. In Flat Rock, Pebble Brook
Park meets the criteria for classification as a mini-park.
- Neighborhood Parks. Neighborhood parks are typically multi-purpose facilities
which serve as the focus of recreation activity for an entire neighborhood.
Neighborhood parks are generally 3 to 10 acres in size and should be easily
accessible to the neighborhood population, with safe walking and bike access.
The recommended service area is a 1/2 mile radius. These parks typically
contain areas for active recreation, such as ballfields, playlots, and tennis
courts, as well as areas for quiet recreation activity, such as walking,
sitting, or picnicking. The two elementary schools and the high school
function as neighborhood parks in the City of Flat Rock.

I.
[

- Community Parks.
Community parks typically contain a wide variety of
recreation facilities to meet the diverse needs of residents from several
neighborhoods. Community parks are generally 10 acres or more in size with
a 2 mile service radius. These parks typically contain areas for active and
quiet recreation, pl us other facilities not commonly found in neighborhood
parks, such as nature trails, fishing areas, a band shell or pavilion. Such
parks generally have access to major streets and are centrally located within
the community. Community parks in Flat Rock include Hu Roe Park, Flat Rock
Community Park, and the Simpson Junior High School recreation facilities.
- Regional Parks. Regional parks are typically located on . sites with unique
natural qualities which are particularly suitable for outdoor recreation, such
as picnicking, boating, fishing, swimming, camping, and trail uses. Such
parks generally exceed 200 acres in size. Regional parks typically serve
several communities, although most users are within 1/2 hour driving time.
The four HCMA parks, including Oakwood Metropark which is located partially
within Flat Rock City limits, are regional parks which provide regional
recreational opportunities for Flat Rock residents.
Evaluation of Existing Recreation Space and Facility Needs
One determination of recreation space adequacy is comparison to nationally
accepted standards of acreage per 1,000 persons. Once these genera 1 space
requirements are identified, it is necessary to determine if there are any
specific recreational deficiencies based on existing development, proposed
development and the desires and needs of the service area residents.
- 67 -

�In terms of overall recreational standards for land, City-owned parks alone fall
short of national standards. The National Parks and Recreation Association
recommends 6.5 acres per 1,000 people. Based on this standard, the City should
have 42.8 acres of parkland for its present population and 59.3 acres of parkland
by the year 2005. Currently, the City owns and maintains only 38.3 acres of
parkland.
However by combining all City, School, and HCMA owned park properties located
within Flat Rock, there is a total of 141.2 acres of developed parkland available
to local residents. This figure exceeds parkland needs for both the City's
current and projected (year 2005) population.
Table 17 compares the acreage of park types within the City to national
standards. These figures indicate that the City has adequate neighborhood and
community park acreage for both its current and projected population, but is
deficient in mini-parks and regional parks. The deficiency in mini-parks is
partially mitigated by the excess of parkland in other categories.
The
deficiency in regional parkland is mitigated by the HCMA park system, which
provides adequate regional park facilities within a 1/2 hour drive from Flat
Rock.
TABLE 17
COMPARISON TO RECOMMENDED PARKLAND STANDARDS*
I.

MiniParks

Neighborhood
Parks

Convnunity
Parks

Regional
Parks

Recommended
Minimum Acres per
1000 Population

0.25

2.0

5.0

10.0

Estimated Existing
Acreage**

0.2

34.0

71.5

35.5

Acres Needed for
Existing Population
(6,853)

1. 7

13.7

34.3

68.3

Acres Needed for
Projected Population
in 2005 (9,486)

1. 9

18.0

47.4

94.9

I.

I.

I.

*Based on National Parks and Recreation Standards.
**Includes City, School, and HCMA properties.
- 68 -

�•

Based on national standards, the City of Flat Rock appears to have adequate park
acreage for its current and projected population. However, the existing parks
and school sites are located predominately in the central portions of the City.
Because Hu Roe Park and Flat Rock Community Park are classified as community
parks, which have a 2 mile radius service area, these parks are adequately
located to service the entire City.
·

I.
l

Neighborhood-type recreation facilities, however, have a service radius of only
1/2 mile and, therefore, should be more evenly distributed throughout the City.
As the City develops, there will be a need to identify sites for neighborhood
parks in the outlying portions of the City. For example, facilities at the
school-owned playground near Dover Street could be expanded to provide for
neighborhood recreation for residents in the southeast portion of the City.
Evaluation of park acreage alone does not assess the type of facilities located
at each park. Table 18 details standards for recreation facilities and compares
actual facilities available to projected need in the year 2005. The table
indicates that additional court facilities (hardball, basketball, and
volleyball}, a soccer field, golf course, indoor ice rink, trail, archery range,
and campsites will be needed by the year 2005. Some of these facilities are
available at nearby regional parks, including trails, golf course, and campsites.
Summary and Recommendations.
Based on the preceding evaluation, the immediate emphasis for parks and
recreation improvements in Flat Rock should be on the development of facilities
and general site enhancement at existing parks, rather than the acquisition of
new park properties.
However, in the l anger term, as new residential
subdivisions are developed in the outlying portion of Flat Rock, the City should
assure that adequate property is set aside for neighborhood parks to service
their subdivisions.
1. Hu Roe Park and Flat Rock Community Park should continue to be developed as
community-wide parks and as important focal points within the City.
Emphasis should be placed on enhancing the natural amenities at Hu Roe Park
for passive recreation. This park should be incorporated as part of the
downtown area. Flat Rock Community Park should continue to be developed for
active recreation.
2. As outlying portions of the City are developed, mini-parks and neighborhood
parks should be · incorporated into new residential subdivisions.
Specifically, parks will be needed in the following areas: 1} the northwest
portion of City in the vicinity of Arsenal Road, 2} in the central part of
the City, south of Vree 1and and west of Cah i 11 Road, and 3} south of
Gibraltar Road and west of Cahill Road.
3.

i-

The City should continue to explore the possibility of leasing the HCMA owned property (located east of the Huron River and north of Will Carleton
Road} for campground facilities.

- 69 -

�.
r-·

TABLE 18

.

RECOMMENDED RECREATION FACILITY STANDARDS

r
I -

r
I.

I-

Facility

Reconunended
Facilities
per 1,000
Population

Existing
Facilities

Facilities
Needed For
Projected
Population
of (9,484)

Projected
Deficiency

Softball Fields

1/5,000

3

2

Adequate

Baseball Fields

1/5,000

5

2

Adequate

Picnic Areas

None

2

Continued
Improvement Required

1

Continued
Improvement Required

Published
Picnic Shelters

None
Published

Playgrounds

1/3,000

5

3

Adequate

Tennis Courts

1/2,000

8

5

Adequate

Basketball Courts
- Outdoor

1/5,000

0

2

2 Courts

Soccer Fields

1/10,000

2

2

Adequate

Golf Course

1/ 25,000

0

1

Adequate

Community Center

1/25,000

1

1

Adequate

Senior Center

1/30,000

1

1

Adequate

Handball

1/20,000

0

1 or 2

1 Court

Swimming Pool
- Indoor

1/20,000

1

1

Adequate

l.

Indoor Ice Rinks

1/50,000

0

1

1 Rink

ll:_

Campsites

1/150

0

63

63 Sites

Volleyball

1/5,000

0

2

2 Courts

l.
'

[

Trails

I/Community

0

1

1 Trail

Archery Range

1/50,000

0

1

1 Archery
Range

Source: Based on standards published by the National Parks and Recreation and
the Michigan Department of Natural Resources
- 70 -

�I

1-

•

4.

The City should continue to maintain and enhance all existing parks and
recreation facilities. The design of local parks is very important, and
should take into account annual maintenance requirements and aesthetic
enhancement. Good landscaping of local park facilities wi 11 add to the
overall character and image of the City.

5.

The City should prepare a master recreation plan to provide overall
direction and phasing for the development of recreation facilities within
the community. It is recommended that the pl an be prepared to meet the
guidelines set forth by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR),
so that the City may qualify for MDNR grant programs.

6.

The City and the Flat Rock Community School District should continue to work
together to enhance and support their existing recreation and adult
education programs. These programs currently provide excellent recreational
opportunities for the residents of Flat Rock.

I'

I..

- 71 -

�r•-...

I

•

L_

[
r·_

[_-

FUTURE LAND USE
Introduction

Early development in Flat Rock was oriented in relation to three primary
transportation axis: Telegraph Road, Gibraltar Road, and Huron River Drive.
Telegraph Road near the Huron River became the "main street" of the central
business district.
Eventually, the central business district expanded to
encompass about 12 to 15 blocks, generally east of Telegraph Road. The Telegraph
Road frontage consisted of primarily retail uses, whereas the rest of the CBD
contained a mixture of service, institutional, and residential uses.
Patterns of early residential growth were prescribed by the other two primary
axes, Gibraltar Road and Huron River Drive.
The largest single family
neighborhood in the City developed in a large triangular area bounded by
Gibraltar Road on the north and Huron River Ori ve on the south. A second
concentration of early residential growth occurred northwest of the CBD along
Huron River Drive.
The fourth major transportation axis -- the railroad -- also affected the early
development and general form of the City. The general pattern of commercial and
residential development was split diagonally by the railroad line, demarcating
the north boundary of the CBD.
This basic pattern of development was in place in 1970 when the previous master
plan was completed. In more recent times, the development of the City has been
affected most signifi.cantly by access to I-75. The Gibraltar Road interchange
created opportunities for regional-oriented development on the east side of the
City.
Concurrently, Telegraph Road's role as a regional transportation corridor
declined. As a result, much of the recent commercial development along Telegraph
Road has been oriented toward a local market, rather than toward travellers.
Other changes in the commercial sector have occurred in the . two decades since
the last master plan was prepared. The level of economic activity in the CBD
has continued to decline. The commercial district along Telegraph Road north
of the railroad tracks is now the primary retail district in the City.
It is important to examine Flat Rock's current development pattern in the context
of time. For most of its history, Flat Rock's development has been concentrated
in a very small part of the City. The City had been in existence for several
decades in 1970, but still only one-third of City's land area had been developed
upon. The interchange at Gibraltar Road opened a new frontier. If looked at
in the context of the City's entire history, the "exploration" and development
of this frontier is in the very early stages. Gradual, steady growth in the
eastern part of the . City would not be out of character with the pace of
development experienced over the past several decades throughout the City.

[. :
f.
I
I

i..

- 72 -

�Although the City recorded a few major developments in the 1970's and 1980's,
almost half of the land in Flat Rock remains vacant. Thus, the opportunity still
exists to shape the City to the form desired by residents and community leaders.
Planning Goals. Early in the planning process, the Planning Commission and City
Council reviewed and approved a series of goals to help sort out some of the
difficult decisions that are addressed by the Master Plan. Primary goals agreed
upon by the City leaders include the following:
Neighborhoods: Foster strong, vital neighborhoods to ensure that Flat Rock
continues to be recognized as a stable community where families and
individuals reside, work, and shop.

- Master Physical Planning: Maintain complementary land use relationships
which promote a harmonious, attractive community; preserve natural
resources; promote a sound tax base; and provide for manageable traffic
volumes.
- Property Maintenance: Recognize that the City and its physical resources
are dynamic, and aggressively encourage property maintenance and
reinvestment.
- Fiscal Stability: Promote the development of a financially secure community
which can continue to provide all necessary services to its residents and
businesses in an efficient manner.
- Land Use: Promote efficient use of the land and encourage assembly and
orderly redevelopment if appropriate land use pl ans are presented for
underdeveloped areas, areas isolated among more intensive uses, or areas
which are declining or negatively impacted by nonresidential traffic or
incompatible land uses.
I

l

l.

- Planning Innovation and Fl exi bi l i ty: Encourage innovation in land use
planning (e.g., Planned Unit Development) where innovation would achieve a
higher quality of development than would be possible under conventional
regulations.
In addition to these general goals, the Planning Commission and City Council
reviewed and approved more detailed goals concerning land use, housing, the
environment, economic development, transportation, community facilities, and
recreation. These goals have been thoroughly examined during the planning
process in light of data, analysis, and recommendations produced during the
course of preparing the Master Plan.

Future Land Use Map
The Future Land Use Map (Map 6) sets forth recommendations for continued use,
new development, and reuse of land in the City over the next two decades. The
Future Land Use Map is a link between what exists and what City leaders and
citizens would like to have .
- 73 -

i.

�Together, the Master Plan and Future Land Use Map provide a flexible guide to
promote informed public and private decision-making for the betterment of the
community. The land use designations on the map are generalized; they are not
intended to be site specific or to follow specific property lines. Although
the Master Plan and Future Land Use Map form the basis for the Zoning Ordinance
and other rigid legal controls, the Plan and Map are intended to be flexible
policy documents and decision-making guides.
General Form of the City. The Future Land Use Map builds upon past growth and
prevailing development patterns. According to the map, intensive development
is generally limited to two areas: along the Telegraph Road corridor and on the
east side of the City, in proximity to I-75.
Commercial and service uses are concentrated along Telegraph Road.
New
commercial development is expected, particularly north of the railroad tracks.
Specialized retail, office, and residential development is expected to occur
south of the railroad tracks in the downtown.
Two types of intensive development are slated for the east side of the City.
Industrial development is indicated on the Future Land Use Map north of Gibraltar
Road. A mixed use pattern is indicated on the map for the land on the south side
of Gibraltar Road near I-75.

I

I

I

L

Residential development is specified for most of the remaining land in the City.
Single family residential development is the most predominant residential land
use classification.
Multiple family development is called for in several
locations, to serve as a transition zone between the single family areas and more
intensive land uses. Interspersed within the residential areas are various
public uses, such as parks and schools.
Recommendations for each of the land uses identified on the Future Land Use Map
are reviewed in the next several pages.

Single Family Residential
The Population Analysis revealed that the rate of population growth levelled off
in the 1980's after five decades of continued growth. However, the analysis also
found several events that are expected to generate additional population growth
in future years. These events include economic expansion and increase capacity
of the sanitary sewer system.
SEMCOG projections indicate that the population of the Clty will increase by 38.4
percent by the year 2005, resulting in a total population of 9,486. At the same
time the average household size is expected to decrease to 2.31 persons. To
accommodate the projected population increase an additional 1,792 housing units
would have to be constructed by the year 2005. To accommodate this level of
growth, about 386 acres of land must be turned over for residential development
during the next two decades.

- 74 -

�The ba 1ance of housing types is an important concern with regard to future
residential development. Almost one-third of all existing housing units are
rental units. About half of the units constructed between 1970 and 1980 were
multiple-family units. The housing balance must be shifted in the future, toward
a greater proportion of single family units. This shift is needed to address
a latent need for higher quality single family housing and to reinforce the
City's neighborhoods.
The following standards should be used to guide future residential development:
- Ideally, new residential development should occur in planned settings, such
as subdivisions or condominium developments, rather than at random along
thoroughfares.
- Residential development should be coordinated with the availability of
sewers, public water supply, and public roads.
- The creation of "neighborhoods" should be a primary residential development
objective. There is a need to coordinate housing construction with the
development of schools, parks, community services, and neighborhood
shopping.
The Future Land Use Map identifies five areas where new single family development
is appropriate:
- South of Gibraltar Road. New development must be coordinated with land use
patterns in existing neighborhoods. The opportunity exists to create some
of the most attractive homesites in the City through subdivision design that
is sensitive to the natural features, particularly the woodlands, which
exist in this part of the City.
Northwest part of the City. Roads must be developed to provide access to
large vacant landlocked parcels which are suitable for residential
development.
The extension of Vreeland Road to Inkster Road would
facilitate development in the northwest part of the City.

L
i

L

Central part of the City. The central part of the City, north of Gibraltar
Road and west of Cahill Road, is viewed by many City leaders as the best
location for high quality single family development. Housing in this area
would be located close to the City's primary commercial district, public
facilities, and schools. Access roads are needed in this area to unlock the
development potential.
- Northcentral part of the City. The opportunity exists for additional single
family development north of Vreeland Road and south of the mobile home park.
The layout of any future residential development in this area must be
sensitive to the potential impact of more intensive uses to the north, east,
and west.
- City Center. The opportunity for new residential development exists in
downtown Flat Rock. A ·variety of housing types could be developed in the
downtown area, including townhouse, mid-rise, or single-family housing. Ne~

- 75 -

�..
I

:

''

'-

I

I_-

housing should be integrated into an overall mixed use development plan for
the downtown.

Mobile Home Park
The land use survey completed in 1988 revealed that 2.8 percent of the City's
land area is occupied by a mobile home park which is located at the north end
of the City, between Telegraph and Peters Roads. One objective of the Master
Plan is to seek a more balanced range of housing, yet provide opportunities for
construction of various types of housing to meet the needs of residents. Also,
it is the intent of the Master Plan to minimize additional demands on public
services and minimize any deterrent impact on future low density single family
development elsewhere in the City. Accordingly, the Future Land Use Map does
not designate any additional lands for mobile home park development. If the
housing balance improves in the future such that additional single family homes
are constructed, then future mobile home park development may be appropriate.
Under such circumstances, expansion of the existing mobile home park to the south
would be appropriate.

Multiple Family Residential
It is intended that areas designated for multiple family use be developed with
attached housing at a density of between seven and ten units per acre. The
nmultiple familyn classification may include single family attached townhouses,
apartments, or mid-rise housing. Multiple family areas are generally located
on the Future Land Use Map where they can serve as a transitional zone between
commercial or industrial development and lower density sing~e family housing.
Multiple family areas are also located where they would have direct access onto
major thoroughfares so as to minimize the impact of increased traffic on the road
system and on nearby land uses.
i

I

The Future Land Use Map identifies five general areas where multiple family
housing is appropriate:

l

On the south side of Gibraltar Road, in the vicinity of existing multiple
family complexes. Vacant land between the existing complexes provides the
opportunity for limited expansion.

I.

!.

- On the east side of Cahill Road, between Vreeland and Gibraltar Roads.
Multiple family development in this area would serve as a transition zone
between the single family area to the west and the industrial area to the
east.
- Along Arsenal Road, north of Huron River Drive. Multiple family dev~lopment
in this area would serve as a transition zone between the developing single
family area to the north and the intensive development along the railroad
and on Huron River Drive.

I
I

I

L

- 76 -

�- On the west side of Telegraph Road at the north end of the City. The
location of this parcel, its shape, the character of land use to the north,
and other site constraints make this parcel of land suitable for multiple
family.
- On the south side of Vreeland Road, between Cahill and Telegraph Roads.
Multiple family development in this area would serve as a transition zone
between the proposed single family area to the south and the industrial/
railroad area to the north.

Commercial and Office Uses
The economic analysis revealed that there is a strong potential for commercial
and office development in Flat Rock, as the population, number of households,
and total income in the trade area continues to increase. Research presented
earlier in the Master Plan indicated that the Flat Rock trade area is currently
underserved in terms of retail facilities, based on comparison with other
communities.
As such deve 1opment occurs, it is expected that the particular function, or
market niche, of each commercial district will become better defined. North
Telegraph Road is expected to retain its status as the primary retail and service
district in the City. The downtown area is expected to develop as a mixed use
center of office and specialty retail. The Gateway planned mixed use area is
expected to contain regionally-oriented retail development, office, and lodging,
among other uses.

I.

A more complete description of the commercial and office areas designated on the
Future Land Use Map follows:
North Telegraph Road Business District. Over the next twenty years, the
Telegraph Road business corridor, north of the railroad tracks, is expected
to retain its status as the main retail/service district in the City. To
accommodate the projected growth in the commercial sector, the Future Land
Use Map calls for Commercial/Retail development along almost the entire
length of the north Telegraph Road corridor. Furthermore, the Future Land
Use Map provides for greater depth for the commercial frontage wherever
feasible. The greater depth will allow for limited expansion as well as
improved site design on existing inadequately-sized sites.

Downtown Flat Rock. In accordance with the mixed use pattern proposed for
downtown Flat Rock, limited retail, office, and service uses would be
appropriate. Three factors should be considered when evaluating commercial
development proposals for downtown: 1) the intensity of any such development
must be compatible with existing and future residential development that is
1ocated in the downtown area, 2) the intensity of deve 1opment must be
appropriate for the size and configuration of the site on which it is
located, and 3) emphasis should be placed on upgrading existing facilities
and quality building design.

- 77 -

�".

,I

l
f.

l

f.

- Neighborhood Commercial Development. The Future Land Use Map identifies
two locations where neighborhood commercial development is appropriate: the
"Big Lots" shopping center on the south side of Gibraltar Road, east of City
Hall, and at the intersection of Huron River Drive and Sheek Boulevard.
Future development in these areas should consist of low-intensity
convenience commercial uses that are compatible with the surrounding
residential development.
- Gateway Planned Mixed Use Area. Retail development would be appropriate in
the Gateway Commerce Center area, as a part of the mixed use development
plan anticipated for the area. A broad range of commercial uses would be
appropriate in the Gateway area which, because of its location, would serve
an automobile-oriented market.

Office Development. In addition to the downtown area, the Future Land Use
Map identifies one other location where substantial office development would
be appropriate: along Gibraltar Road.
Office development along this
corridor would serve three purposes:
I

•

!

1. Amply landscaped office development would provide an attractive entrance
to the City.
2. Office uses would provide a buffer between residential development to
the north and south and the traffic on Gibraltar Road.
3. Offices would be compatible with the existing churches along Gibraltar
Road.

Planned Mixed Use Development
As noted previously, "Planned Mixed Use Development" is designated in two areas
on the Future Land Use Map:
Gateway Planned Mixed Use Area. The conceptual plans that have been
considered by the City in the past provide a general indication of the range
of uses that might be appropriate in the Gateway area, including retail,
office, research, lodging, and light industrial uses. There are three
principles that will determine the success of a mixed-use development
proposal in this area: 1) the timing of the proposed development, 2) the
ability of the proposa 1 ( based on the mix of uses) to create a focus of
activity that will draw a new regional market to Flat Rock, and 3) the
quality of the overall plan, which must integrate several different uses
into a single functioning unit.
- Downtown Flat Rock. The new senior citizens building was a major project
that upgraded the image of downtown.
Additional "major projects" are
required to reverse the gradual decline that has been evident. The Future
Land Use Map provides for a mixed land use pattern in the downtown that
includes office uses, retail, and housing uses. Replacement of existing
uses and buildings may eventually be necessary or, based on the future
I.
I

:

- 78 -

�development plans, it may be possible to combine existing and new uses.
Detailed plans for the downtown are being prepared by the Downtown
Development Authority.
New housing is viewed a key component for the revitalization of downtown,
since it would provide market support for the retail uses. Townhouses (68 units per acres) or garden apartments (10-15 units per acre) would provide
the required population concentration. Such housing should be designed to
be compatible with existing single family housing in the vicinity.
Any development proposals for the downtown must be sensitive to the fact
that this is the oldest part of the City. Although new development is
necessary, structures which have historic value should be preserved and
renovated. Because the downtown was developed several decades ago, the size
of the parcels and the configuration of land uses favor pedestrian movement.
It is necessary to adapt the downtown to higher level of vehicle movement
in order to meet needs of modern business, but the pedestrian environment
must still be retained.

Industrial and Railroad Use
The Economic Analysis revealed that conditions are conducive for industrial
growth in Flat Rock. The City's industrial attributes include access to freeway
transportation, availability of vacant land, and access to rail facilities.
Vacant lands on the east side of the City are best-suited to the locational
requirements of industry because of the immediate access to I-75. Accordingly,
"General Industrial" ·use is indicated on the Future Land Use Map for the Mazda
parcel, plus land adjacent to the Grand Trunk classification yard north of
Vreeland Road. An objective of the plan is to maintain heavy industrial uses
on the east side of the City to minimize the effect from trucks, noise, fumes,
and other impacts on the rest of the City.
Planned light industrial and warehousing is proposed in three locations:
- As a transitional use along Hall Road.
In this location, the light
i ndustri a1 development wi 11 pro vi de a buffer between the more intensive
industrial development to the east and the residential development to the
west. Ideally, new light industrial development should be contained in
planned industrial parks or a similar planned setting.

[

- Along Cook Road near the railroad tracks. The uses in this district have
adapted to unusual site conditions that would not be suitable for most other
uses. The Future Land Use Map provides for the continued operation of this
existing industrial district, provided that the intensity of development
does not increase.
However, efforts should be made to upgrade the
appearance of these facilities and to provide a more direct outlet onto
Telegraph Road.

[
I
I

L...

- 79 -

�- North of the railroad tracks, on the west side of the City. The Future Land
Use Map provides for continued use of 1and which has been used for
industrial purposes for several decades, beginning with the a Ford Motor
Company operation. The site is currently occupied by Flat Rock Metals. Any
increase in the intensity of the industrial use would not be appropriate in
this part of the City.
As noted earlier, light industrial use in a planned setting would also be
appropriate in the Gateway planned mixed use area.
Existing lands currently being used for industrial use in the vicinity of Arsenal
Road near the railroad tracks are not designated for industrial use on the Future
Land Use Map. The existing industrial uses in this area have been in a state
of decline for several years. The sites are too small to accommodate most modern
industrial operations. Commercial uses would be more viable on these sites in
the long run. Furthermore, commercial development would be more compatible with
the existing and future residential uses in the vicinity.

1..

The Grand Trunk rail classification yard is an established industrial/
transportation use which provides significant economic benefits for the City.
The Future Land Use Map anticipates the continued operation of the classification
yard within its existing boundaries.

Parks and Recreation
The Community and Recreation Facilities chapter indicated that the immediate
emphasis in terms of parks and recreation planning should be on the development
of facilities in existing parks, rather than acquisition. However, the analysis
recognized that as new residential subdivisions are developed additional
neighborhood park land will be needed.

[
I
(.

l_

.•

Based on this assessment, the Future Land Use Map identifies two existing Cityowned parks, Hu Roe Park and Flat Rock Community Park (adjacent to City Hall).
Emphasis should be placed on enhancing the natural amenities at Hu Roe Park for
passive recreation use. Flat Rock Community Park should continue to be developed
for active recreation.
Lands located on the west side of the City which are owned by the Huron-Clinton
Metropark Authority are also identified as "Parks and Recreation" on the Future
Land Use Map, even though these lands are not currently open to the public. This
land would be suitable for campground use or nature study.
The Future Land Use Map also identifies four "Proposed Park Sites" in locations
where neighborhood parks will be needed after residential development occurs.
The proposed park site designations are intended to be generalized; they are not
intended to be site specific or to follow specific property lines. Additional
information concerning proposed parks and recreation improvements are set forth
in the City's Recreation Plan.

- 80 -

�Finally, the Future Land Use Map identifies riverfront park sites which are still
under study. Two such sites are publicly-owned lands which could be developed
to provide limited river access. Two other riverfront properties, on Arsenal
Road south of Hu Roe Park and south of the Telegraph Road bridge, are privately
owned.

Public Facilities
The Future Land Use Map identifies City facilities, schools and school owned
properties, and cemeteries. Key public facilities are identified below:
- City Hall Complex. City Hall is a modern, spacious building which is
located in a highly visible, centrally situated site on Gibraltar Road. As
indicated in the Community and Recreation Facilities chapter, the
opportunity exists to develop the site into a true civic center by
incorporating other public facilities (such as the library) and by
continuing the expansion of the adjacent Community Park. The civic center
function would be further enhanced if the high school is moved to the large
vacant school-owned parcel directly north of City Hall.
- Schools. Parcels occupied by four schools are identified on the Future Land
Use Map:
I.

1. Flat Rock High School is located on 5.4-acre site on Division Street.
Current published standards indicate that Flat Rock is in need of a more
modern high school facility on .a larger site. The vacant property north
of City Hall would be an excellent location for a new high school.
2. Barnes Elementary and Simpson Junior High are located adjacent to each
other on Meadows Street. These sites are adequate in size, but a direct
means of access is required.
3. Bobcean Elementary Schoo 1 is 1ocated on Evergreen., north of Gibraltar
Road.
The school district owns one other large parcel of land in the City, on the
east side of Arsenal Road, south of Matilda. New school construction on
this parcel is not anticipated in the near future.
Single family
development would be appropriate in the event that the school district
relinquishes ownership of the parcel.

Road Network

[

The Circulation Analysis identified several circulation system deficiencies
including:
- Increasing traffic congestion and traffic conflict on Telegraph Road.

r-

- Lack of a direct link between Gibraltar Road and Telegraph Road .
- 81 -

�r

-r;

....

'\.

- The need for access roads to serve vacant lands and schools.

I,

- The need for collector roads to complete the road •network.•

r.

- The need to pave roads to facilitate development in underdeveloped parts of
the City.
Recommendations to address many of these deficiencies are set forth in the
Circulation Analysis and on the Comprehensive Circulation Plan Map (Map 4). The
Future Land Use Map i dent i fies access roads needed to serve vacant 1ands,
including: extension of Vreeland Road west to Inkster Road, extension of Seneca
east to Cahill, extension of Cahill south to Woodruff, and connection of Meadows
and Carter Streets to provide a link between Tamarack and Olmstead. The exact
location of these road extensions could vary depending on topography, location
of drains and wetlands, the need to align new roads with existing roads,
proposals for new development, and similar considerations.

I,

/_

r

1--

I

II_,

- 82 -

�·~
_____. /'
,:::,1.-·.~·-.

~~~ ~i)

·\
&gt;:\1'.:

~1~~

-L

cu1,,po111

,,
,,,,""

11

III

:,,! ,.,--- '--; ~

// '-.._____ ·...

,,
I'

I'

·,

//

1'
,1
1'
,1
11

,,

,,'

!\

' .:·..... ,

\ ,

~[WB!flll

",,,,
,,
=----=

\\k~o•u•===cY-=--

I'

LEGEND
□

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

PUBLIC
(CITY HALL , SCHOOLS, MUNICIPAL BUILDINGS &amp;
CEMETERIES)

~!i!iili!/!l/lli/;I

lt f

MULTIPLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

OFFICE

MOBILE HOME PARK

~

COMMERCIAL/RETAIL

-=-

,~t.!.~~1x..e~1~~~'?.oM!~~f.lJJSE DEVELOPMENT
CBD PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT

(RETAIL, OFFICE &amp; HOUSING)

E]
~

GENERAL INDUSTRIAL
PLANNED LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
&amp; WAREHOUSING

R
.

PARKS &amp; RECREATION

RAILROAD

[l

PROPOSED PARK SITE

POTENTIAL RIVERFRONT

~ ACCESS
sn,ov)

X

,

PROPOSED ROAD

WNOER

LAND USE ■ ■ ■
CITY OF FLAT ROCK ■ ■
WAYNE COUNTY
MICHIGAN ■

■

■

■

■

■

FUTURE

-

scale
800(1600

■

■

north
3200
feet

. . . . Mtp • SOIH'U! Ci1y ol ,1,1 Aocll, Michigan

one
mile

CD

MAP 6
MS:KeMa Associates, Incorporated
Community PlaMlng • Urban Design
Farmington Hills, Michigan

F

.,.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008252">
                <text>Flat-Rock_Master-Plan_1990</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008253">
                <text>McKenna Associates, Incorporated</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008254">
                <text>1990-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008255">
                <text>Master Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008256">
                <text>The Master Plan for the City of Flat Rock was prepared by McKenna Associates, Incorporated In January 1990. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008257">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008258">
                <text>Flat Rock (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008259">
                <text>Wayne County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008260">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008262">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008263">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008264">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008265">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038322">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54696" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58967">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/fc6c9f20667c023b3ea1e78f53764fb2.pdf</src>
        <authentication>4274aabbf6359c6ef6b9b36c2f127bae</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008251">
                    <text>\

F I L E; ., R

T O WN S H I P

C O MP R E H E N S I V E
February _ 19, 1988

P L A N

�FILER TOWNSHIP
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
February 19, 1988
INTRODUCTION
This report is intended to be the basic or master, or
comprehensive plan for the Township of Fi~er.
It is the adopted
plan, adopted as authorized under Michigan Public Act 168 of 1959
(being the Township Planning Act, MCL 125.321 et.
seq.&gt;.
It is
also to serve as the plan referred to in Section 3 of P.A. 184 of
1943 (being Township Rural Zoning Act MCL 125.27~&gt;.
This plan is the main guiding document and statement of
towhship policy for growth and development in Filer Tpwnship.
Decisions as to priority, and where future extensions of roads,
water mains,
parks, etc. should be in conformity with this plan.
All future amendments to the Filer Township Zoning Ordinance
should be in conformity with this plan.
Filer Township chose to contract with the Manistee County
Planning Commission to provide professional staff to work with
the Township's
Planning Commission.
The County Planning
Department staff wrote this plan under the guidance and direction
of
the
Filer
Township
Planning Commission.
Decisions,
recommendations and policies in this plan represent the Township
Planning Commission's desires~
In doing
work on this plan,
certain people provided
assistance, information and their time.
They are:
Steve Harold
of
the Manistee County H~storical
Museum; Duane Marquand and
Marjorie Johnson of the Filer Township Planning Commission.
The
editor typist and proofreading for this document was done by Kurt
H. Schindler, County Planning Director and Sue Wagner, Planning
Department secretary.
Also this report relied heavily on other plans and documents
which, by their nature of use,
become adopted _by reference in
this plan,
where applicable. · They are: The Manistee County Land
Use and Development Policy. as amended; United States census data
for
1980 and earlier years; · Manistee County Third Level Soil
Association Report and Tables,
March 1982;
Manistee County 1982
Economic Adjustment Strategy; and Manistee Lake Management Plan,
1982.

,-- .

Members of the Filer Township
Planning Commission:
Duaine Marquand, Chairman
Marjorie Johnson, Secretary
Joseph Adamski
Ed Allen
Alvin Janowiak
Ed Radtke
Jane Sievert
Paul Stelasky

Members of the Filer Township
Board of Trustees
Alvin Janowiak, Supervisor
David Rhodea, Clerk
Bernard Feliczak, Treasurer
Melvin Kruse, Trustee
Charles Wisniski, Trustee

i

i

�:•·,.·:·' • -:~,-.&lt;'.:·..~~?-~t":~;•i?:: .;~: ~&lt;. '·'•.'._\'_·..... ,.

'

~

: ~ ·(~·~.:&lt;. .-· .: ·,.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
GEOGRAPHY • • • • • • • • •
. SLOPE OF THE LAND • · • •
Quaternary Geology Map • • • • • • • • • • • •
Slope and Erosion Restrictions Map.
Topographic Map, u.s~ . Geological Survey • • • •
HISTORY

. . . .. . . . .

.

.

,• .

.

•· . .
. . . . . . . •.
Filer Township Historic Sites • • • • • •
Filer Township Area Maps • • .
Historic United States Census Data • • • •

NATURAL RESOURCES • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • •
SURFACE WATER. • • • • • • • • • .
SO I LS •

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

I

If

•

• • •
• • • •
•

•

12
12
13

•

•

•

16

..

• .•

•

7
8
10
11

•

. .

•

. . . .

FORESTRY • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
AGRICULTURE
• • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
SPECIAL AND UNIQUE ·ENVIRONMENTS AND NATURAL FEATURES
Watersheds Map. . . • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Flood and Septic Building Restrictions Map. • • •
Filer Township Third Level Soils Map.
• • • •
Forest Production Potential Map • • • • • • • • •
Agricultural Lands Map. • • . • • . . • • • . . •
Designated Special and Unique Environment and
Natural Features Map • •
• • • • • •
POPULATION

•

1
2
4
5
6

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.

.

Filer Township Population by . Age Table • • • • • •
Persons by Race and Spanish Origin Table • • • • •
1980 U.S. Census Ancestry Information Table • . •
Resident-Seasonally Adjusted Average Population
Chart • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • .
Filer Township Population Projections Graph ~
Filer Township Housing Distribution Map
1980 Census Data Advance Final Counts Table • • •
Housing, Households, Seasonal Homes Table
Manistee County Detailed Housing Characteristics
Table . . . . · . . • . . . . . . . .

Estimated Housing Heating Data Table • • • • • • •
Detailed Housing Characteristics Table.
Estimated Age of Housing Chart
.••••.
ECONOMY

. . .

..

. . . . . . . . . . . . .

Employment and Business Estimates Table • • .
Filer
Township
Commercial
/
Industry Land
Occupation Map • • • • • • • • • •
• ••
Labor Force Profile (1980) Table • • • • • • • • •
1980 Census Data - Labor Force Table • • • • • . •
Mani~tee County Estimated Labor - Force Data Table
ii

17
17
19
20

21
22
23
24

25
29
32
33
34
35
36
37

37
38
38
39
39

40
40
43
55
56

57

�.
. ·"' ...

Estimated County of Employed Persons by
Worker Tabll • . . . . . . . . . .
Estimated Income and Poverty Data Table

.. .

Class of
57

58

COMMUNITY FACILITIES (INFRASTRUCTURE)
•••••••••
UTILITIES • • • • • • • • · • • • • • • •
WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE • • • • • •·, •
SIDEWALKS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
PUBLIC BUILDINGS • • • • •
• •••••••••
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND VACANT PUBLIC LAND • •
Electric Utility Service Areas Map • • - • • • •
Natural Gas Service Areas Map • • • • • • • •
United ·S tates Post Office &lt;Zip Code) Service Areas
Map •

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

• ~

•

Cable Television Service Areas Map • • • •
Green Lake County Drain Map
•••••
Filer Township Water System Map
•••••
Filer Township Storm Drains Map • • • • • • •
Sidewalks Map • • • • • • • • • •
• •••••
Public Buildings Map. • . • . .
. ....
Fi~er Township Parks, Public Vacant Land, and
Private Recreation Facilities Map.
• ••
TRANSPORTATION • • • • • • •
BUS TRANSIT • • • •
HARBOR
RAILROAD • • • • • • •
Road Map around Manistee Lake
••••
Manistee County Road Commission Road Certification

59
59
60
62

63
63
66

67

68
68
69
70
71
72
73

74
75

78
78
79
81

•

82

Road Commission Certification Detail Map.
Road Surf ace ·Map • • • • • • • • , • • • • • • • • •
Road Surface Detail Map • . . • • • • • . . • • •
Manistee County Road Commission
and Michigan
Department of Transportation Average Daily
Traffic County Map • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Railroad Extension and Switch Yard Map

83

LAND USE ANALYSIS • • • • • • • • • • . • •
LAND OWNERSHIP • • • • •
LAND FRACTIONALIZATION • • •
LAND USE • • • • • • • • • . • • • •
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
••••.
Filer T6wnship Parcel Ownership Map
.•.
Filer Township Recorded Subdivisions Map.
Land Fractionalfzation Map • • • • • . • .• • .
Filer Township Land Use/ Cover Map
••.
Filer Township Land Use/Cover Map Key • • . • • •
Filer
Township
Community
Character
Map of
Neighborhoods •. • • • • • • • • • • •

88
88
88
91
95
104
105
106
107
108

Map

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

iii

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

•

• .. •

•

•

84
85

86
87

109

�.
.' . .
' .;.

'

.,•,

.....

BOALS, OBJECTIVES, ACTION PLAN • • • • • • • • • •
. • •
Existing Service Are~s of Filer Township Map . • •
Filer Township Planned Service Areas Map
...
Deficiencies in Planned Service Areas Map
LAND USE DEVELOPMENT • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
Filer Township Land Use Plan Ma~ - 1986 • • •
TRANSPORTATION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
RECREATION • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • •
INFRASTRUCTURE • • • •
• • • • • • • • • •
• •
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
•. • • •
• • •
NATURAL ENVIRONMENT.
• • •
• • • •
HISTORIC AND.. CULTURAL, POPULATION, OTHER
• • •
\

iv

---

.. .

-------------- -

·- - - ----

110
112
113
114
115
116
121
123
124
126
127
128

�,

GEOGRAPHY
Filer
Township·s
surface
geography is a product of
glaciation.
A .great deal can be · learned about .the natural
features of the township through review of the glacial formations
in . the county.
The . network of hills west . of U.S. 31 South along Lake
Michigan are the extreme southern end of the Manistee end
moraine.
The hills are deposits created by water running off the
edge of a stationary glacier.
The Manistee Moraine -- generally north of . Manistee .City,
has better farm soils.
The good soils, combined with the
irregular topography and moderate lake effect climate, lends the
area to unique farming conditions.
However, in Filer Township,
these thre~ major factors do not combine in the same area to
create conditions to designate an area for fruit growing.
The moraine in Filer Township · normally has occasional
deposits of gravel
and clay.
One site in southeast Filer
Township has High Two Clay deposits, unusual for this part of
Michigan.
Kettle hole lakes are found in Filer Township and are formed
by a block of glacial ice buried with sediment in a moraine or
plain.
The ice block then melts leaving a round shaped lake.
Generally a kettle hole lake does not seem to be connected to
surface water drainage pattern in the county.
A kettle hol~ lake
is likely to· be found at various altitudes with a small drainage
basin and not connected to any rivers.
Canfield Lake is a
classic example.
Others migh_t include King Lake, Gambs Lake and
Shingle Mill
Lake.
Other inland lakes are thought to be post
glacial.
_T he valley along the township's north boundary is thought to
be a
iacustrine plain.
A ~acustrine plain in the center of
Manist~~ County is the Boardman River glacial drainage corridor.
The theory is thi_s dra1nage corridor, during glacial times, also
included the valley at the north end of Filer Township.
A major characteristic of lacustrine plains is the presence
of wetlands and poorly drained soils.
Lacustrine plain soils are
relatively infertile and poor for farming.
The· majority of Filer Township is an outwash plain.
The
outwash plain ·is where water moving away from a glacier deposits
sand and silt, creating. flat areas and fluvial
fans, etc.
In
Manistee·s case, the outwash plain has Rubicon and Grayling soils
with some wetland.
The land is very poor for farming and
infertile.
The water table is irregular.
The area has scattered deposits of better soil such as clay
ball.
Often these are found today by noticing a healthy hardwood
August 21, 1987

-1-

�I(

tree surrounded by scrub . oak or pine.
system in the clay ball.

That tree&lt;s&gt; has its root

SLOPE OF THE LAND
The areas shown on the map following this section have
limitations for high · density residential
development.
The
hillsides, being steep, can cause erosion problems during the act
of construction and afterwards with paved drives and lawns.
Septic tank. absorption fields are difficult to install and
require special measures and design.
Side hill seepage can
occur.
Although the above cautions are given in Soil Conservation
Service Land Resource Inventory Map~, few of the hi .ll&gt;sides in
Manistee County are so severe that development without proper
measures is not possible.
With a trend toward energy efficient homes -- including
underground homes hillside building sites might be considered
more desirable.
Obviously, though, cautions in erosion control
and septic field installation must be required.
The SI.ope and Erosion Restrictiqns map shows the general
area of moderate to extreme slopes.
The slope was estimated by
use of contour maps and transferred to the map in this report.
Lake Michigan shoreline bluff erosion is also shown on this
map.
The setbacks for erosion are determined by estimating the
rate, or amount of erosion which is likely to occur at a given
location along the shoreline.
For example, along the south half of Filer Township, high
risk erosion setbacks are established at 55 feet.
The 55 feet
was determined by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources by
using historical air photos, surveys, etc. and comparing the
shoreline with modern surveys and air photos, etc.
The erosion
was measured . for a period of 30 years.
Thus a 55-foot setback
indicates that the shoreline has eroded 55 feet in the past
thirty years and is estimated to erode another 55 feet in the
next thirty years.
Erosion rates and setbacks were not established where loss
of bluf~ occurred at an average rate of 1 foot per year or less
(30 feet in thirty years&gt;.
However, in recent years, with high Lake Michigan water
levels, actual erosion has not occurred as predicted.
Observed
erosion has occurred in areas where not predicted, has not
occurred where predicted, and has occurred at rates greater than
predicted.
The minimum setback
(administered via permit by the DNR
unless the same or stricter setbacks are incorporated into local
zoning) is designed to protect a structure built along Lake
Michigan for a period of thirty years.
Thirty years is usually
the length of a mortgage.
For longer protection, a greater
setback should be followed.
Setbacks to protect structures and ·shoreline ~n Filer
August 21, 1987

-2-

�.- ,

. . :·

.

Townshi'p should be subs~antially greater than DNR required
setbacks ,and should apply throughout the township.
A contour map of Filer Township follows this section .

\

August 21, 1987

-3-

�\'-~

QUATERNARY GEOLOGY MAP

End Moraines (fine textured
til former stillstands of
sheet margins)
~ Lacustrine Sand and Gravel
~ (suspected)

D

Glacial Outwash and Post
Glacial Alluvium

f
22.

Source:

..,

23

.-....
ITl

DNR Geological
Survey Division

~

~

0

I:

I

zCl)

I

. :i::

""'

..,....

'l1

~

tr.

2'

0

S
C)

o&lt;
..

)4

J3

'

5

31

4

3

2

. . . . J::t # • .,..

�IF!

' \.)

Restrictive Steep
Slopes for building
purposes (more than
65
12i% slope)
50

0·

®
I
V'I
I

Lake Michigan High Risk
Erosion Areas
Top number is the
recommended setback
. from the . top of the
bluff.
Bottom number is
the -minimum
setback from
the top of
the bluff.

21

.,

23

~.

•

•

...

-

I

■

Cl&gt;
t"'"

.,,
t
0

l"1

t,

l"1

~

11

ii

2S

f

25

3)

I I

0

Cl&gt;
~

0

:z:
~

l"1
Cl&gt;

;1
M

n

t-i
0

M

:z:

Cl&gt;

)4

33

z

~

- •.. ----•

'

5

4

3

,/

-~-

2

31

�TOPOGRAPHIC MAP. U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
1958
I'

20 Foot Contour Intervals

\

J .u

I

i,

-6-

�. : . ...
~

' •,

.

HISTORY
,.

As the land . changed following the glacial activity, the
various beaches and water ;courses provided ideal habitats for
human occupation.
· Because of this, Indian sites, frequently
temporary camp sites, may be found · · near any of the ,l akes or
creek~ of Filer Township.
About a thousand years ago, the land
along Magoon Creek at Lake Michigan was used as one of these camp
sites.
Here Indians utilized the abundant natural food while
making projectile points and pottery vessels from the nearby
clay.
Lumbering activity began in the.· area now known as Filer
Township with the settlement of the Stronach family nearby in
1841 •. Althoµgh their second mill was in the adjacent township to
the east, they purchased and logged most of the land at the east
side of the present Filer Township.
The lumbermen who came to Manistee County around 1850 were
the first purchasers of the majority of the land in Filer
Township.
It would appear there were several small pockets of
prime pine timber, ·notably al.ong the Lake Michigan shoreline and
in Section 33. The balance of the land was purchased because of
access1bility to the · Mani.stee mills. The timber was cleared off
and the land was then used for agricultural purposes.
In 1855, Manistee County was organized and divided into
three townships.
The land of present day Filer Township was
included in Stronach Township . for locaf government purposes.
Between 1850 and 1867, _the Township saw a gradual · but slow
development.
Even at this early dat~, the adjacent large
population of Manistee needed food and farm activity was started
in the township because of the ready market.
One or ·more large
dairy f~rms were developed and extensive orchards were planted.
Major activity commenced ih 1867 when the Filer family, at
the time one of the largest lumbering operators in Manistee
County, moved to Section 19, today's Filer City area.
They built
a large mill, platted a village, and commenced to log all the
nearby land.
About the same time, two other mills were built on
Manistee Lake in Section 12, today's Oak Hill area, those of
Stakoe &amp; Nelson and Horace Taber &amp; Sons.
With all this activity,
the Township was set off from Stronach in 1868, and established
its own local government.
The readily available jobs at the mill
caused a steady influx of people and the population increased
from 376 in 1870 to 1,033 in 1880, and 2,101 in 1890.
Four years
later, as the smaller mills were closing, the population peaked
at 2,253.
August 21, 1987

�·•,· . ... -_.- -~:i~•,':' ~-~ ·j:f ·:··/.;·

. . ··&lt;

Industrial :.activity . continued to be centered in Section 19.
The Filer and ) Sons mill operated until about 1914.
This was
replaced in °.1917 :by a pulp mill known as Filer -Fiber. Over the
years, this . plant has . been sold and -e&gt;&lt;panded,
including paper
mills, into a large industrial activity. Other industries have
included a drop forge and chemical plants_.
As already stated~ agriculture was . important ta township
residents at · an early . date because_ of the nearby population
center at Manistee.
By 1904·,
there were 80 farms in the
township, averaging 52 acres each.
These farms each had a few
cows, a team . of ,- horses, several pigs, .and ·. , chickEms.
For almost
all the farms, truck crops were an important source of income.
Cabbages, sweet- corn, . cucumbers, . strawberries, apples, and grapes
found a ready mar-ket in Manistee.
In addition, th~re were
several large dairy farms which supplied milk to the nearby
populace.
Traditionally; commercial activity in Filer Township has
been concentrated near industry.
Sizable communities grew up
around each · sawmill.
Initially, all
purchasing was done at
company stores, but with time other stores were opened in each
community •
. In recent years, commercial activity has developed
along U.S. 31 through the Township.
After the turn-of-the-century, the prime pine timber of
northern Michigan was gone and the majority of the sawmills in
Manistee County ceased operation.
This caused a steady decline
in the population of Filer Township to a law of 1,344 in 1930.
However, by this time the automobile and goad roads had arrived.
With this transportation, the many people who lived and worked in
Manistee sought a move away from that city.
Filer was nearby and
large numbers of families took up resi~ence in the Tawrtship.
This has caused a steady incr-ease in the population until it
reached 2,143 in 1980 - almost back to the , 1900 level of 2,238.
Filer Township Historic Sites

C

\

./

National Register of Historic Sites/Districts
(none)
State 01 Michigan Historic Regi~ter and Centennial Farms
(none)
Manistee County List o~ Histo~ic Sites
Unknown shipwreck sites, along Lake Michigan shoreline
Unknown lurnbercamp sites
Architecture
House
2200 Nelson St.
House
2406 . Nelson St.
House
1302 Twenty Seventh St.
Golden Filer House
2600 Filer City Raad
2600 Filer City Road
Golden Filer Carriage Hause
2600 Filer City Road
Golden Filer Guest House
1825 Maple Road
.Joseph Gambs House
4564 U.S. 31 South
Herman Bruski House
4311 U.S. 31 South
Bruski Four• Buildings
August 21, 1987

-a-

~

�-~n:::-: •,s,: r:t'5'Jf:t:i~!W~f~r;,t? ",· . &lt;,, .·.·•·•· .·. · --., ,-, •· ·
·.,.'.·\\.'...,&gt;··,.. '.I

,

:Rakoniewski .Cabi'n
3666 Rakoniewski Road
1951 ·'/ fist, , •- kill
fri . Manis.tee Lake and pollution control
_ac;t1'vity - heightened . in Manistee Lake
Transportation
f:='irst'·_- north-south· :_waiking route - Lake Michigan beach
Allegan~uskegon
·a nd
Traverse
Bay
State
Road
.,·· •. ····-:_._(predecessor · . of U.S • . 31&gt; follows today's Nelson
:- ..:·Street . and · due south to county line
Filer Township Historic •Sites
Two former ·. farm homestead sites at Magoon Creek
Magoon . Cr.eek archaeological site
Sands cottages on Twenty-First Street
Old School~ 2600 Nelson . Street
Old 1 room Russell School, Cherry -Road
I
01 d 1 room Ayers School, Fox
Farm ~ U.S. 31 C.extensi vel y
remodeled) .
Old 1 room Flynn School, South County Line and Maple Road
·Township Hall, 2505 Filer City Road
\

August 21, 1987

·--·- ·

· --. -· •· ..

-9-

�..

Area of Filer Township. as part· of Stronach 1855-1868

I

r

T 21 N

\

T O WN S H I P

0

organiz.ed 1855
R 17 W

R 13 ~
tO'JmlSSlOA

R.14 W

R 1S ti

R 16 W

MANtsTU COUNTY PLANNING
·,

Filer Township for 1870 through 1960 U.S. Census

~
e

nship

.; f ,

_J_,:J\.

T 21 tt

To,:,ship

R 17 W ...

R 14 W

R 1S 11

R 16 W

R ll

~

MANISTEE COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSI~

Filer Township for 1970 and 1980 Census

T 21 N

Norman

O

R 17 W

n

16

w

Township

R 14 W
R 13 W
JMN~ tOUNT't PLANNING C~~
- . .. •·•·· ·-·
.....

R 1S ti

---------·--···- ··--

•·

------· -----------

Filer Township. p~st 1980 Census

T 21 H

Noraan

O

R 17 W

nl6W

RlS\:1_ 10 ~

-- - ·-· ···-· . ... •·- -·-

.

ll14W

Township

RllW

_1 1 . ~ ~----- ........... ·- :_ _

•. ·-

•

�.-·-....

r - '\

j

~--·

\.,
&gt;.

.'

.. :::\~·.:_:.

·-•.:

:•

·.:

I

Hlstorlc United Stites Census Data - January 1983
1860
Manistee County
Filer To1t11shlp
Manistee City

1810

1880

1890

1900

1910

1920

1930

1940

19S0

1960

1970

1980~
Housln1

1910

,1s s.911b 12.s32 24,233h21.1s6 26,690 20.199 11.409 11.447 11,s24 19,042 20.391 21,01, 12,21s
376 1,033 2.101 2.238 1,969 1.s1s 1,121 1.2s1 1.Jls 1.104 1.,21• 2.14J
116
3.342 6.930 12.112 14.260 12,311 9,694 1,071 1,694 1,642 1,324 7,723• 7,66S J.247

\ Population Chan&amp;•
1970-1980
•12 . !I\
•11.6\

-2.0\

• Fl1urt 2.61 people per household (llvin&amp; unit). Housin&amp; counts includ•_,11 aalntaintd car• tor houses, apartaents, cabins, suaa.r h0111s,
11&lt;&gt;bllt ho■ es. ■ edical tacilitits. Jails.
b
Manistee County lost territory (Cleon Twp.) to Wuford County.
h
Manistee County &amp;aintd ttnitory (Cleon Twp . ) lroa Wu(ord County.
•
ManistH
Clty added tenltory.

-~

•

. , .:: .

·• ,·

... . . :: .

�NATURAL RESOURCES
SURFACE WATER
Filer .Township is divided between si~ ' dr~inage areas-watersheds: .. ·.t1anistee Lake, Little Manistee River, Gurney Creek,
.Magoon Cr.e ek, and direct: flow into Lake Michigan south of
Manistee City ..to Magoon · Creek and between Magoon · and Gurney
Creeks.
A Watersheds map at the end of this section shows the
estimated divides between watersheds in the township.
Watersheds are the areas around a creek, river or lake which
drain• into ' .that creek, river or lake.
Thus any water which does
not evaporate or soak into the ground flows downhill
to a
particular body of water.
In Michigan's glacial geography,
groundwater ~eves in roughly the same direction.
Thus one can
make an educated guess as to the direction sedimentation, septic
nutrients and industrial pollutions wil~ migrate.
This type of
consideration · · is
important
.in locating new subdivisions,
municipal water wells or major disposal sites.
A complete list o.f surface water lakes and streams in listed
here:
Lakes: . .
Canfield Lake (Section 24)
Butcher Lake . (Section 24)
Gambs Lake (Section 13)
Lake Winnogene (Section 13)
Unnamed (Section 36)
Unnamed (Section 36)
King Lake (Section 32)
Shingle Mill Lake (Section 32)
Unnamed (Section 32)
Kujawski Lake (SectionL31)
Manistee Lake (part, east township boundary)
Lake Michigan (east shoreline)
Rivers, Streams:
Magoon Creek
(mouth in Section 28&gt; a designated trout
stream
Unnamed (mouth in Section 33~ a desi~nated trout stream
Wetlands in Filer Township include the headwaters of Magoon
Creek, areas associated with lakes, and kettle hole bogs in the
southeast/central part of the township.
There are two major
wetland areas in the township.
The most significant, and
fragile,
are wetlands associated with Magoon Creek a~d its
headwaters and the marsh area at the south end of Manistee Lake,
associated with the delta of the Little Manistee River.
The Land
Use/Cover Map in this plan illustrates the location of wetlands.
August 21, 1987

-12-

�~\'!.~::ft:.~ t:.":, ·: .; ..1 .., :·J·•:,
• I

~

•

. ,.·.

. . __..:-.-~long : wit;h ._ the -discussion : of surface water, coastal areas ··
along ::Lake Michigan are classified as · flood prone ·. or flood hazard
areas • . · The classification "e&gt;&lt;fsts -for townships which / have passed
~esoluti'ons ..to participate '· in ' · the National -Flood Insurance
Program ·created_. by the U.S • .. Congress, as Filer Township ··has done.
Flood , and septic .restrictions map is found at the end of
this section.
This same .map . -. illustrate~ locations where it is
not likely homeowner sewage disposal systems --- septic · tank with
a drain field or dry well ··-~ wouid be permitted. These -_ areas were
drawn with
the _assistance · of Mr • .James Lerg ·, ,·, . Sariitarian,
Manistee-Mason District Health Department.
Using · :'files : in his
office showing each parcel of land where a · septic_· tank ·'permit had
been denied was shown on township (8 1/2 by 11 and · 8 · 112 : by 14)
contour maps.
Areas shown as wetlands by the u.-s. -Get&gt;logical
Survey, and areas where the health code required 1oo ·foot ·setback
from water or wetlands was also marked on the maps as areas where
septic systems would not be .allowed.
Mr~ .· Lerg al so shaded other areas where he suspected an
application for a septic tank would be denied due to the area's
failure to perk when tested.
Such areas may be acce~table for
low density . development where there is room for special designs
or larger drain fields (10 acres per living unit&gt;.
The information from Mr. Lerg's maps was transferred to the
Flood and Septic - Building Restrictions Map at the end of this
section.
SOILS

)

Soils information used for this plan (map at the end of this
section&gt;
is based on the _ Manistee County Third Level Soil
Association Report and Tables of March 1982.
The soils
information is a major source of data .on fhe township's land
resources.
Soil data is a major factor · in determining prime
forestlands and
timber productivity
rates,
in identifying
nati anal 1 y unique agricultural areas
a _n d 1 oc:al l y essential
farmlands, and soil characteristics play a role in determining
septic tank feasibility, industrial disposal limitations, and so
on.
I
The Third Level Soil Associatio~ report is not a modern
progressive soil survey.
Such detailed information has not been
done for Manistee County. A third level soil association report
is a compilation of soil conservation service soil maps of
individual farms.
The farms were mapped when they became
participants in the SCS/Soil Conservation District programs.
Suc:h mapping has been done from the 1930s to present.
After
compiling individual farm soil maps, a soil scientist uses air
photo and. a windshield survey to interpolate soil information in
the un~apped areas of the county.
The soils information is
"third level"
in that it uses old soil survey information,
involves interpolation, and involves combining similar soils into
broad categories
(associations&gt;.
Such a report is useful for
broad planning purposes and for ~aking zoning ordinance policy
August 21, 1987

�:· ,; ' ·. ~:,/·;i:.

-~.,~': •-:~~~t{{{:_':
. ·. ·;· :

decisions. · ·However., .-site inspection is . necessary. for planning
specifics, such · as . for- -'.buildings, roads, farm :operation, taxation
.a nd -so on.
On the - map, soils were ' divided mto soi.l associations and
. labeled by a letter-number · code.
Discussion. here ·, · for summary
-purposes, will include '. the . generalized categories shown on the
attached map .with parentheses enclosing soil · association codes.
Sandy soi 1 s - · Deer Park and . Eastport' CA-21 k.&gt; ,
and Rubi cons
. CB-1)
are ,mainl~ . found in the north and west part of the
township.
These soils are most common in Filer - Township and can
be found - throughout the southern half of Manistee County~ The
soils are characterized as infertile and not well suited for
agr.fcultural
purposes.
The sandy texture contributes to the
draughty, well drained nature of the area. Water sel·dom \forms in
puddles, but . soaks into the soil rapidly.
Irrigation efforts
must be extensive.
The soils tend to be stable in that they do
not heave or shift upon freezing.
This characteristic allows for
excellent building sites, road beds, etc. which may not require
as large a foundation or base as would be required in other soil
types. The rapid permeab~lity of the soil also·allows pollution
-- mainly septic nutrients-· to move relatively rapidly through
the soil • . While a septic tank will
"work" in that it dcies not
back up, concern comes with the rapid .movement of effluents and
poor filtration ability of the soil.
This can be countered by
requiring larger drainfields, and discouraging use of drywells.
Loamy sand soils
Kalkaska-like soils with · a weaker
profile development similar ~o Rubicon CC-7) are mainly found
in the southeast portion of Filer. Township.
The soils are
characterized as more fertile than the sandy soils, but still not
considered excellent agricultural production soil. Poor soil
management practices have degraded much -of this· category of
soils.
Most of the soil &lt;C-7&gt; is consid~red by soil scientists
to be a depleted soil which was originally a soil with a stronger
profile, Kalkaska
(C-8).
Again, the soil is droughty 9 with a
rapid water intake.
Drainage is generally not needed with the
rapid percolation.
Crop or timber productivity will be higher
than sandy soil~ 9 but will vary within the general group.
Some
of FilerI Township row crop
farms
are
located
on
land
with
soils
'
which fall into this category, though there is much better farm
soils found in Filer Township.
The soils tend to be stable, in
that they do not heave or shift with freezing or when becoming
wet or dry.
As above 9 this lends itself toward better building
sites.
With rapid permeability of the soil,
the same concerns
exist relative
to septic tank and pollution discharge as
express~d for sandy soils.
Both sandy soils and loamy-sand soils are subject to wind
erosion, blowouts and sidehill seepage.
Clay-loam and Clay soils -- Nester and Kent &lt;C-1&gt;, Nester .
and Manistee. series in complex with loamy soils
&lt;C-5)
-- are
located in two spots, mainly associated with the Manistee moraine
in the extreme northwest corner of the township
(Cherry .and
Merkey Roads) and in a spot in the southeast part of the township
L

August 21, 1987

-14-

· ';.i

�·, . .~·t,;.· .. ::~,.='.:;::r: ,=-: . ;..·•., : ·:· •:_.:·.:.• .-:~ •
.. . .

(

&lt;Linke , Road).
This
soil . grouping
represents
the . best
agriculiural and . timber productiv~ty soils i~ Manistee County.
• These areas of the county are rated nationally · prime timberlands
potential .and, if flat and not urbanized, considered locally
essential farmlands. potential.
The : -soils are moderately well
drained, so . puddles can form .on the surface, water- gullies can
form, and the soil · ~s ·.. generally_ tiea°'(ier., _a nd more compact.
· Ir:-rigation efforts :can :· be ·more fruitf_ul · than _on · sandy or loamysand soils. The clay ··:· soil has · a . slow.-::&gt;permeability, · and is
subject to eros~on ··re!:;Ul ting from . -rapid water runoff .
These
soils are not as :·-.· stable . and will heave/-shff.t,'·, ·upon ·freezing ·-and
thawing and ' will shr:,ink/swell upon becom~ng ,•.wet and drying •. More
attention and - experise is necessary for -~'c:ji.Jndation .work ~nd road
·bed . construction ·: . is likely in these · areas. · Often the slow
permeability of the ·soil does not allow for use · of septic tanks
with dry wells a~ drain fieids.
Historically, many of the clay
soil areas of the county have been denied septic tank permits by
the Manistee-Maso~ Dist~i~t Health Department.
Sandy-loam -soils -- Emmet and Menominee series in complex
with sandy soils ·cc-3&gt;
- are found in spots in the south and
east portion .. of the township, usually associated with the edges
of the Manistee Moraine.
Loamy soils are also considered as
better for timber and agricultural production potential.
The ' ·
areas these soils are found in are also classified as nationally
prime timberland potential and locally essential agricultural
land potential.
The areas these soils are found in are also
classified as nationa~ly prime · timberland potential and locally
essential agricultural land potential.
The soil is well to
moderately well drained, and like clay and clay-loam soils, may
require some tile d~ainage.
Irrigation efforts are more fruitful
than on sandy-loam soils, but water seepage will be more rapid
than clay and clay-loam soils.
The soil is not as heavy as the
loam-clay and clay, but also does not have properties as light as
sandy soils.
Its ability to support foundations without·movement
is near a . compromise between a sandy soi 1. and clay soi 1. Loamy
soils, however, will tend to slip sideways · (down a hill) though
not as. dramatically as clay soils. Septic tank operation is not.
uniform ., throughout this groupi.ng of soils.
The tendency,
however, is for the so'il not to perc, or to be less than
efficient in allowing uater
movement, making
septic tank
operation and maintenance more difficult.
Wetland complex soils -- all mucks, organics, sands, clays
and loams in wetland conditions &lt;D-2, D-4, E-4, E-7, F-4, G-2)-are found to be mainly located in the south and east part of the
township,
associ a _ted
with
1 akes,
potholes
and streams.
Obviously, all
such areas require artificial drainage for
d~velopment.
For the large part, these soils have not been rated
for agricultural use (except Croswell series (Ds&gt; which tends to
fall between loamy soils and _loamy sand soils in productivity
potential).
This group of soils has also not been rated for
timber potential.
Fill,' and possibly removal of organics and
mucks first,
is necessary for . foundation or firm building site,
August 21, 1987

-15-

�.. ,

)

...

.•·. ·'

if permitted or possible at al 1. These areas of the township do
not perc, and ·septic · tank · disposal systems are ·not a viable
alternative.
The last generalized group involves small areas.
Discussion
is not necessary for the following soil groups:
sand, sand dune
and dune 1 ands · -&lt;H-3)
mainly along •Lake Michigan · beach; and
alluvial land and flood plain sediments &lt;H-6&gt;.
FORESTRY

(,

Using information from the soi~s ·report and data put
together by the Prime Forestlands Identification Project in
nor,thwest Michigan, the Forest_ Production ·Potential map following
this section illustrates · the · areas in . Filer Township which ·a re
classified as
nationally prime timberlands, timberlands of
regional importance .and areas not classified.
For purposes of
this plan, Filer Township does not have any timberlands of local
importance.
Forestry for Filer Township is an important industry, with
Packaging Corporation of America, a corrugated medium paper and
pulp mill and various logger~ and handlers.
Despite · the relatively large number in Manistee County
already receiving income from an aspect of the timber industry,
literature indicates expansion of the timber industry is one of
the best routes for Michigan economic development.
The Northwest
Michigan Prime Forestlands Identification Project reiterates this
conclusion.
Prime forest l ands are those lands which are capable of
producing sustained high yields of ·wood products.
Capability is
determined by the physical and chemical characteristics of the
soil.
Four classes, or levels,
of prime forestlands are
recognized as defined by the U.S. Departme~t of Agriculture:
1.
"Prime timberlands"
Lands which are capabl• of
producing 85 cubic feet
(about one standard cord)
per · acre p~r
year in fully stocked natural · stands.
These lands are nationally
significant, found in the northwest corner of the township, and
spotted throughout the east and south parts of the township.
2., "Unique timberlands" ~ Lands which are not capable of
producing 85 cubic feet per acre per year but are growing
substantial quantities of specific high value species or species
capable of producing specialized wood projects. Some example~ of
unique timberlands in other states are those which support black
walnut plantations, pecan, and Atlantic white cedar.
There are
no unique timberlands desigriated in Filer Township.
3.
"Timberlands of statewide or regional importance"Lands in addition to prime and unique timberlands, that are of
statewide or regional
importance for the growing of wood.
Criteria for delineating these lands are to be determined by a
state forestry committee.
The Prime Forestlands Identification ·
Project Technical Committee has developed a regional guideline to
use as a substitute until these criteria are determined.
These
lands consist of soils designated as important forestland by the
August 21. , 1987

-16-

�.L, ,?~

1' ,

1

~·:1, ....... :•:• .~•·.. :~

.

'-· ,'. ;.:..,.,...,,_.. ,~..,.,·.~::-:~•.;p;'/:";'(-lt:':: ~-

Y,: :i·~:-t:!..: :"··~;, ~~~··.',:' :'..:. .'

:.

.
.• ~

::

,•

-

(

- local resource groups . :and . which produce medium-high to high
volumes of wood products~
Most. of ·Filer Township's land area
falls in thi• ~ategory.
4.
"Ti~berlands · of local importance" - Lands which are not
identified as· : having national .. or regional significance but are
important ·to our local communities.
These lands were also
identi-fied ' by the local resource groups.
None, or no noteworthy
areas, were designated in Filer ··Township.
AGRICULTURE
The agricultural lands map, following this section, draws
it~ conclusions from two ·sources.·
First, the nationally unique
fruit sites are delineated in the Red Tart Cherry Si'te Irwentory
for . Benzie and M.anistee Countfes, Mi'chigan.
Second, locally
essential farmland are those areas in which clay, loamy-clay, and
loamy soils are found.
The map is not intended ·to indicate where farming takes
place; it is attempting to present a general idea . what areas of
the . township are best · suited for
a particular
type of
agricultural activity.
Manistee County does not have any prime farmland.
Soils and
climate simply do not provide the combination of factors which
create the conditions for top of the line farm areas.
Filer
Township does not have Nationally Unique Farmland. Geoclimatic
conditions for favorable fruit growing sites do not exist in the
township.
For purposes of this plan, the following definition is used
for locally exceptional farmlands:
"Lo1=ally exceptional farmlands"
Areas which are not
nationally prime farmland or unique farmland,
but which have
Nester, Kent, clayey soils; Emmet, McBride• Menominee, Newaygo or
Ubly loamy soils; above clayey or loamy soils in complex with
Blue Lake, East Lake, Kalkaska, Karlin, Leelanau, Mancelona or
Montcalm sandy soils,· or in complex with Emmet, Menominee and
Newaygo loamy soils as shown and coded in the Manistee County
Third Level Soil Association Report as C-1, C-2, C-3 and C-5.
Further, such . areas are relat)vely flat, few rocks, free from
urban d~velopment, not e&gt;&lt;cessively eroded, not saturated with
water, available irrigation water, all
in such a manner to
accommodate common farmiMg pr•ctices in Manistee County.
SPECIAL AND UNIQUE ENVIRONMENTS AND NATURAL FEATURES
Special and unique environments were identified on a countywide basis by conducting a survey of known natural, unique and
significant features and areas that might
warrant special
attention in the county.
Much of that survey material is not
reiterated h~re, nor a matter of public record.
Sites, such as
those for
endangered species, or archaeological sites are
intentionally omitted from specific listing in order to protect
the areas from the curious, vandals, and so on.
August 21, 1987

-17-

.

�··.·:.· .. "• :

The survey .- included features listed below:
a.
Archaeological Sites.
b.
Historical · Sites •..
c.
Hi~torical Structures.
d. Scenic Overlooks.
e.
Scenic Roads.
f.
Scenic Areas.
g • .Rare Geological Features.
h.
Glacial or Geological Formations.
i.
Areas of Endangered, Threatened or Rare Species •
. j.
Unique Forestlands. ·
k. Unique Nonforested Lands.
1. Unique Water Features.
m.
Unique Wetlands.
\
n. Other Unique Areas.
After· conducting an ·inventory of the above, the location&lt;s&gt;
of each were plotted on a map.
The locations of the plots
provided evidence that most locations -t ended to congregate along
some land feature.
Thus, areas in Filer Township, each with
attributes listed
above, can be defined with a boundary.
Obviously, _ all items inventoried are not included within areas of
special and unique environments.
It is not the intent to list each feature.
Rather, the
intent is to designate special and unique environments.
This is
taken to imply "areas" where several attributes are found, rather
than "points" representing a feature.
A . map at the end of this
section shows location of . special and unique environments in
Filer Township.

August 21, 1987

-18-

�f"\

t

l.

, .-..........- ;1
,

...
j

WATERSHEDS MAP

'

.,

»

Lake Michigan Shoreline
_579 Manistee River to Magoon Creek
f 582 Magoon Creek to Gurney Creek
I

Manistee Lake
341 Manistee Lake

Rivers
340 Little Manistee River
580 Magoon Creek
581 Gurney Creek

!.

1 tI

·,i,

Oak
0&gt;Gum1&gt;,
Lale,

f

~-'-

'

i

~~

....

~,,.
, ,,, \Butchtr,,
~---;Lo.Jr,

.i[)c.;,vtt1J
ru ~ ◄

I

~-

1.0
I

••

..
•• •

••

"-

.

•

•••..... +•• : ••••

.

en

::II

9 ..
.
.L . ~''t- '

•. , lab

• I•

;

I

......&amp;...-_,-a,..._,

-

. . .',J\
..

H
"ti

.

~

a

' -

en

I

,,

,

I

*" •• .....

CSJlii

,
•

,,.

:

•

•
~

'

///

•

•.

gJ

I

• ·.

~

I

@)

I

•

I

I

I

: Ayr~ Sch-.,~

f(@
,.

..• ,~.•
'--~,·-~..
' "•;

•

(/

I

I

g

co
:;-~

•

en

.........

.. ~

•I

•

·'

I

Ill

•
I

®

-,.•• ..

DKl,t~

'-vlalc,~

•

•

I

•

I

9'i'lfgl~Mil'1

lif' • !a'J, • lli\t;u k 2 - l ~ .:.Le,_ _-•!;!'
:,
7i .......
- ~ .au,,-r_
.• - ' .
-' • ,
. .
. 7 •C::t·..
.i

~

.

#

·. .

..•

.

.

�-=-'1

.·...... _,/

~

Areas that qualify for
National Flood Insurance
Program (100-year flood
pl_a in)
Areas where septic tank/drain
field permit denial is likely.
(Permit denial is also liyl ·
in flood plain areas along
creeks and Manistee Lake
shoreline.) _

tl

0

g
22.

i

23

en
M

~

1-i
H

n

~

I

N

t:,:I

Q

H

0

I

(I)

i

a

11

f;
z(j)

H
~- I

25

I

.•~.

i

~

en

~

H

n

1-i
H

0

z

en

,

z

-~

-~

'

4

~
I

~

5

,

31

3

2

•

. I

�FILER TOWNSHIP THIRD LEVEL SOILS MAP
1982
Sand

Clay

A2-lk; Deer Park and Eastport with
Lake Michigan effect.
Bl; Rubicon

Cl; Nester and Kent
Sandy Loam
~ e t Menominee ·(loam)
C3; A Complex'lSlue Lake, East Lake, Kalkaska,
. Karlin, Leelanau, Mancelona (sand)
Clay-Loam
[Nester and Manistee (clay)
CS; A Complex: lF.mmet, Menominee, Newago (loam)
Loamy Sand
,
C7; A soil like Kalkaska, but depleted to_a .
;
soil similar to Rubicon (Bl)
Sand and/or Loam ::Borderllne Wetland ··
D2; Croswell (sand)
•
Jcroswell on hill areas (sand)
D4; A complex: Liosco, Kawkawlin, Richer on
low areas (loam)

•;

I

,.

-21-

·, F4· Rosc011DDon (sand) domtnant with
'
frawas Lupton (organic swamp)
a complex:lBergl ;nd,Brevort,Ensley
(clay-loam)
G2; Loxl~y (organic, acid bog)
Miscellaneous
H3· Sand and stony lake beaches and bluffs
H6i Variably textured flood plain sediments
\

".\4

t·

~
:~. Bl

Wetland soils
E4; AuGres and Finch (sand)
(
)
.
j.uGres sand
E7;. In association or a complex~scommon (sand

~

""

""

�~,

:::----,.

\. j!
'-·

FOREST PRODUCTION POTENTIAL MAP

Nationally Prime
Timberlands
~Timberland·s of Regional ··
~ Importance
.

i

'l
'I
I

!

tffllm Timberlands of Local
-,Note; or Not Rated

!

"'1

23

0

~

en
H

;
"d

I
N
N

n

H

I

H

i

3

'

5

4

~

25 .

"d
0

i

3

H

tH

~

2

l

�,r-·\
\.

.,_.,...... ''

I

)
;

:!.--'

--·

AGRICULTURAL LANDS

.

!
I

j

I

(none) Nationally Prime Farmland

·1

~-

....

.,'

I

I

ii I

~-·

I

\

:'!.•.
.;,

.,

~~

'"

·-~

K

(.none) Nationally Unique Farmland
Locaily Exceptional
lands

,,

D o t Rated

22.

II

I

N
CA
I

I

Jri· 1

23

-1

I
t1

I

ii

3

I

~

-

I -

~

~

-~-I I
I
•
§

~

en

31

•

'

4

3

t

~

-~

5

I

~

~

z

33

24

2

l

�•.
-'~\

,

~

,.

~

)

!---..--...,
)

., ~

DESIGNA1~1J SPECIAL AND UNIQUE ENVIRONMENT
. AND NATURAL FEATURES
.

fZI

t@

Lake Mi~higan Shore Spec!al and
Unique Environments ·
- Coastal Zone Management
High Risk Erosion areas
Sand dune and bluffs
- Scenic overlooks
(Sundling Park, Russell
- Magoon Creek Natural Arej
- Archaeological Sites
- Historic and Prehistoric
Explorer Travel Routes
- Beaches

23

22.

'.

Special Pl4nt Natural
Feature within.
immediate area shown

Z7

&gt;4

33

i

~

25

~

~

3l

i

1j

---

'

5

4

3

2

l

�POPULATION
Filer Township's 1980 U.S.
Census counted population is
2,143 people.
This population count represents an 11.6 p ercent
increase in populati·on over the 1,921 population figure given in
the 1970 census.
The growth of Filer Township in the ten years
of ,1970 to 1980 is a continuation of a long-term trend of growth
which started in the 1930s.
\
. Historically, Filer Township started with a population of
376 people in 1870.
The twenty years from 1870 to 1890 saw a
fantastic growth in the township, 558.7 percent, before leveling
off into
a
10.6
percent growth during th~ 1890 decade.
Presumably, during this period the older neighborhoods in the
township -- Oak Hill and Filer City -- were settled in connection
with the lumber industry boom.
After 1900, the population of the township fell almost
equally as fast to a 1930 level of 1,127.
After 1930 started a
slower, but more consistent, pattern of growth through to the
present.
In the period of 1960-1980, the rate of growth has been
stable at about 11 percent for each decade.
Among the people living _ in Filer Township in 1980, the
largest number of indivi~uals who lived elsewhere in 1975 and
moved into the township came from another house which was located
in M•nistee County.
This would include people who were recently
married,
or moved out of their parents' home,
as well as
established families relocating in Filer Township.
This category
of in~migration represents about 256 individuals.
Less than half
that number of people moved into Filer Township -from another
county in Michigan:
119 people.
About 98 people moved into
Filer from . other parts of the United Statei, but not Michigan.
About 238 people in Filer Township in 19~0 were born in a
different state.
About 12 Filer residents were born as citizens
of a foreign country.
The largest minority group in Filer Township
like
Manistee County -- is the native American Indian.
The 1980 U.S.
Census reported 17 individuals with
Indian racial background
living in the township -- about 8 tenths of one percent.
The
census reported that there was no one with Black, Asian, or
Pacific Islander racial background.
Two individuals are reported
to be members of "other" racial background.
People with a Polish ancestry are the most prevalent ethnic
group in the township.
Percentage-wise, Filer Township has a
higher number of people with Polish ancestry than does Manistee
County.
Likewise, Manistee County has a higher percentage of
people with Polish ancestry than does ' Michigan.
This reflects
the immigration into the Manistee area i~ the late 1800s when the
I

August 21, 1987

'-

-25-

�Polish immigrant was the common laborer in sawmills which
developed around Manistee Lake.
Also, the same areas of the
township which were densely settled in the late 1800s -- Oak Hill
and Filer City -- are adjacent and along the Manistee Lake shore
corridor with the "Maxwell Town" area of Manistee City.
Maxwell Town developed as a Polish neighborhood in the city
and is today still recognized in the Manistee County list of
historic sites as an e~hnic community which is homogenous in its
culture, character of buildings, ethnic, religion, and so on.
In far second place, people of German ancestry populate
Filer Township.
The Ancestry Table at the end of this section
provides ethnic data for other ancestries in the township.
Because of Filer Township's location in northern Michigan
and because of its Lake Michigan shoreline, there are are~s which
attract the vacationer or second homeowner.
Using a process of
estimation
(shown on the table entitled "Resident-Seasonally
Adjusted Average Population"&gt;, Filer Township has
a total
seasonal population of 203 additional persons, or a total summer
population of 2,342.
It is presumed that _Filer's seasonal
population was larger at one time.
When development first took
place along ~he Lake Michigan shore
(Red Apple Beach Shores and
the Lakeland Subdivisions) in the 1960s and 1970s, the type of
home built was dominantly the summer cottage.
As time went on
and summer cottage owners reached retirement age, the cottage was
converted i _nto year-round use, or simply became the year-round
home.
With the advent of the Michigan State Construction Code
all housing -- regardless if ~tis intended to be used year-round
or summers only -- must be built to certain insulation and energy
conservation standards. Thus, nearly all homes built after the
late 1970s are constructed for year-round use.
This has
contributed to an even easier and faster transition of resort
neighborhoods into year-round communities.
Subdivisi·ons along the Lake Michigan shoreline in Filer are
no longer "resort" in character.
There is potential for further
subdivision development along the Lake Michigan shore north of
Red Apple Road,
as
existing zoning
and soil
types are
accommodating.
(As one moves farther north, soils become heavy
clay tha~ does not perc, and do~s not allow for working septic
systems.)
Existing zoning south of the Red Apple Subdivision
does not provide for - small lot development and a resort community
is not likely there.
Even with the potential for additional resort development,
the number of seasonally used homes will
be limited as the
lakefront land is recognized as prime home sites by people
relocating in the county -- tending for a
higher proportion of
homes in such areas to be in year-round use.
In addition to the seasonal population, the existence of
three motels :in the township also contributes to a transient or
tourist population.
At its highest,
about 120 people would be
expected to be in the township at any given time.
This can bring
the township's
total
population up to 2,462.
Seasonally
August 21, 1987

-26-

�adjusted, the total seasonal, tourist and transient population is
estimated to have a per-day average of 2,280.

***********
The Population Projections Growth Graph, at the end of this
section illustrates the range of simple straight-line population
projections for Filer Township through th~ year 2000.
The U.S. Census has been estimating a general decline in the
population of Manistee County since 1980.
The decline is due to
the loss of jobs in the county because of the hard economic times
in the first three years of the 1980s.
The Traverse City Data
Center, "Inc.
of Traverse City (a 10-county northwest Michigan
regional statistical analysis company)
has estimated that the
population in Filer Township has dropped 5.7 percent to a 1984
number of 2,021 persons.
For purposes of discussion here, and
for projecting future population, the 1984 estimates are assumed
to be accurate.
The Michigan Department of Management and Budget, Michigan
Information Center, has projected future populations for Manistee
County as in~reasing by about 1,000 persons per decade.
(From
that 1,000 person increase one would subtract the early 1980s'
loss of population.&gt;
Accurate statistical projection at the
township level
is not practical and is not done by state or
regional agencies.
Thus, a simple straight-line graph projection
is used here.
The projections reache~ using the graph method can be
considered to be wi thin the reasonable e&gt;&lt;pectations for Filer
Township.
Filer Township is inseverably connected to the general
Manistee County economy and growth patterns.
It is assumed
events occurring anywhere in the county which impact the area's
growth will have a correspondingly proportional
impact on Filer
Township ' s
growth.
Filer Township is currently ju's t under 10
percent of the total county population.
This has been true for
the . past several
decades and there is_ no appare~t reason to
expect that relationship to change in the future.
When using the straight-line projection (center line) that
method FOi nci des · with the e&gt;epec:ted "just under 10 percent" of
total county population.
The assumption,
or argument here, is
that this proportional relationship endorses the reliability of
the population projection graph.
It is also assumed,
in making these projections, that the
following events
will not occur:
nuclear war;
extensive
conventional warfare invol~ing the U.S.; socia1 unrest leading to
the breakdown of civil government in Michigan or the U.S.; severe
manipulation or t6llapse of world commodity markets or the
domestic economy;
and severe natural disasters such as fire,
tornado, flooding, and so on.
The assumption also made is a
period of steady,
slow economic: growth in northwest Michigan
involving Manistee County.
There is considerable argument that the Manistee area is
about to enter an era of home and business grpwth similar to what
August 21, 1987

-27-

�Traverse City had experienced.
The argument is based on the idea
that land and · building prices are still low in the Manistee
County area but are highe~ both south and north of Manistee
County along the Lake Michigan shoreline.
The low prices will
attract an additional influx of people as natural economic forces
tend to even the prices out along the shoreline corridor.
The opposite argument is that Ma_n istee will experience
canti nued economic setbacks as the ar_e a·· s
1 arger "smokestack"
industries continue to have the troubles they have had in the
first half of the 1980s and as the county continues its shift
from a _ heavy industry base toward high technology retail and
service businesses.
Both these scenarios can influence any
projections, and both may occur at the same time, resulting in a
canceling effect.
\
The projections indicate virtually
no net
change in
population for Filer Township from 1980 to 1990.
Thus it can be
assumed no additional road development, or additional land zoned
for residential or commercial uses will be needed in the township
beyond _what is currently used for those purposes.
Using the high
end of the.range shown in the graph, as many as an additional 100
people might_be expected, calling for the need and potential
development of an additional 20 acres of residential home sites.
(100 people are equal to about 34 families/households, each
occupying abo·u t 25,000 square feet of land which equals just
under 20 acres.)
To infills areas for residential development-instead of continued strip development along existing county
roads
anywhere from · 1/~ to 1 1/2 · miles of
new road
construction will be required.
This is to indicate an absolute
minimum of undeveloped land zoned for residential development,
because some may buy more than 25,000 square feet, and one must
have more land to accommodate competitive speculation of land
development.
No additional commercial or tndustrial areas should
be needed to accommodate additional Filer Township population.

Infill means to have housing constructed in open lands,
vacant lots,
between areas of existing housing, such as parcels
found behind homes fronting on Cherry, Merkey,
Ramona and Red
Apple Roads.
1

August 21, 1987

-28-

�The following
Township by age:

table

presents

the

population

of

Filer

Filer Township Population by Age Table
POI;!Ulation
305 persons

Years o-f Age
birth to 10 years

420 persons

11 to 21 years

311
259
252
308
255

--·I

persons
persons
persons
persons
persons

22 to 32 years
33 to 42 years
43 to 52 years

53 to 62 years
63 years &amp; older

Period of Life
Preschool and
elementary school
and
Secondary
college/work school
Work force
Work force
Work force
Work force \
Retirement

The data,
above,
does not_ tend to support a widely held
assumption that large numbers of young people leave the community
because of lack of opportunity in the Manistee area.
While local
residents may be leaving the area to seek employment, apparently
a near equa~ number of people in the same age group are also
moving into Filer Township,
thus
keeping
the population
relatively stable.
Residents of Filer Township are relatively well educated.
According to the 1980 U.S. Census, of those people who are . 18
years old, or older:
524 complet~d elementary school and up to 3 years of
high school
689 completed high school
179 completed 1 to 3 years of college
77 completed 4 years of college
45 completed 5 or more years of . college
As discussed earlier, people move to Filer· Township from
other areas of Manistee County, supporting the contention the
township is a desirable place to live.
A segment of Filer
Township's growth is also from people moving into the -area from
other parts of Michigan and the United States.
Nationally, there
has been, a · trend in the last 1:,i years for people to move out of
major metropolitan areas seeking homes in rural and small town
are~s.
Demographic analysis by the Uni.ted States Bureau of the
Census and data from the Michigan Employment Security Commission,
as well
as the Manistee County Land Use Plan of 1984, present
similar generalizations about the type of person and the reason
people move into Manistee County, including Filer Township.
People move · to · Filer for three reasons, in addition to
relocation from other parts of Manistee County:
persons moving
here for employment opportunities, retirement, or seeking to get
away from the large city. While those are thought to be the main
reasons,
they are certainly not the entire picture.
Other
reasons include
moves as
a result
of marriage, . marital
dissolution,
seeking larger housing or less expensive housing,
leaving school or the armed forces and desire for a change of
August 21 , 1987

-29-

�(
climate.
However,
most these reasons are secondary.
Major
purposes for relocation. are for employment,
retirement or
escaping the city.
Detailed discussion on employment and economy is discussed
in a separate working paper, but . suffice it to say here that
Manistee County shares in the national trend toward increased
numbers of jobs available in retail,
services,
finance, real
estate, insurance,
transportation, utilities, communications and
health fields.
From 1970 to 1980 Manistee employers have
provided about 17 percent more jobs overall, though some of this
gain has been lost in the first three years of the 1980s.
Lack of
new job availability in the manufacturing and
in~ustrial center has been the factor which has held the rate of
growth in the county in check.
In contrast, new industry\ opening
in the Traverse City area has been accompanied by a much faster
population growth rate in those areas, illustrating the impact of
job availability to po~ulation growth.
A portion of
the
population growth in Filer Township can be attributed to job
availability,
though that number of immigrants could increase
considerably as the economy becomes stronger.
Filer Township also sees a
proportion of
its residents
moving into · the area for reasons of retirement.
This is
particularly true along the residential areas on Lake Michigan
and to a lesser extent in other parts of the township.
To the
degree that retirees bring additional
population to the area,
those people contribute to the area·s tax base, economy and
require ~overnment services • . Retirees buy cars, maintain houses,
go shopping,
and so on -- all of which contributes to the volume
of business in service and retail businesses, which in turn leads
to additional employment opportunities.
The . final
reason for moving to northern Michigan is the
desire to escape from -the city.
This ; migration also brings
people who shop and thus contribute to the economy.
They seek
jobs, or less successfully depend on unemployment or social
services.
An important distinction to make in discussing this type of
individual is that the desire is to get away from the city; not a
desire for rural or country living.
Thus, the expectation is for
an urba~ level of services even ihough they are in a more rural
area.
Of concern in the south part of Filer Township is the
potential for such individuals to .locate next to a farm operation
or forest management area.
In such an instance, it is not
uncommon to hear complaints about the smell and dust from a farm,
noise from machinery in operation on a
farm or in timber
harvesting, an~ so on.
The farmer also may complain about his
new neighbor's dogs, lights, and the neighbor's complaining.
Also,
such new · residents are not accustomed to having a
septic system, its proper care, or the fact that a
permit is
needed;
they want a . policeman, ·ambulance, fire truck.. at their
door within five minutes of the call for help.
There are also people who desi~e . to live in rural areas.
Then, when
individuais get older, or after a
few years living
August 21, 1987

-30-

�there, they start to complain about the lack of urban services in
their rural area.
To avoid such conflicts in land use and to make it more
practical and financially feasible to provide urban levels of
government services,
new residential development should be
concentrated in only certain areas of Filer Township.
Condensed
development allows for more efficient _provision of government ·
services,
allows
for less
infrastructure construction and
maintenance to service a greater number of homes and businesses,
and avoids traffic problems
associated with
lineal
strip
development along main arteries.
Placement and location of new housing is of particular
concern in Filer Township.
Although the population increased
11.6 percent from 1970 to 1980, the number of houses in the
township increased 26.2 percent in the same time period.
This
reflects the national trend toward - smaller families, and reflects
home construction for use as a
seasonal
home,
or second . home
which may become a permanent residence in the future.
Several tables on housing data at the end of this section
provide various items of
housing data on Filer Township.
Data
from those tables indicate some points . of note:
The township has only 9 percent of its housing (68
housing units)
used seasonally,
a significantly lower
number than normal for Manistee County as a whole.
Most housing units were built between 1940 and 1969 in
the township, with a
proportionately higher number of
housing units (comp~red to the county as a whole) built
in the 1950s, 1960s and a
somewhat higher proportion
from 1975-1980.
Filer has a higher proportion of homes with more than
three bedrooms, indicating the community has a larger
number of
large homes in contra~t with the rest of the
county.
With the availability of the Filer Water Department, . a
higher percentage of homes than is normally found in a
Manistee County township have · public water supply.
About 44 percent of the houses in Filer are serviced by
-Filer Township Water D~partment.
None of the houses in Filer Township are connected to a
public sewag~ system.
A septic tank with a drainfield
or dry well is the norm.
Most homes have steam,
hot water or central
warm air
furnaces as the principal source of heat.
Most homes in the township heat with natural gas-which is not normally found
in Manistee townships
because gas utility service is not available as it is
in the northern parts of Filer Township.
Oil is the
second most common heating fuel used with other heating
fuels trailing far behind.
Market value of housing
in Filer Township is higher
than it is in the county as a whole -- about 10 percent
higher.
August 21, 1987

-31-

�"1J1
I

\

I,

'

iY

~.
',~

,-'

.
Persons By Race and Spanish Origin - 1980 U.S. Census Advance Final Count Data (April 1981)

Municinality
Manistee County
Filer Township
Manistee City*

I
(,I

N
I

Tota-1
Population

Persons
Race
Am. Indian,

1980

Eskimo .&amp;
Aleut

White
22,615
i,124
7,447

23,019
2,143
7,665

98.2\
99.1\
98.4\

Black

0.9\
0.8\
0.6\

202
17

46

47 0.2\

--17 0.2\
--

liltit;.,
cr#NI~

Asian and
Pacific
Islander
51
24

Other

Spanish
Origin

0.2\

104

0.5\

316

0.1\

8

0.3\

2
32

0.4\

96

1.4\
0.4\
1.3\

*In early 1980 U. S. Census counts, Stronach Township's population was reported as 826 and Manistee City as 7,566.
This was in error, as 99 people in group quarters (Heights Care Center) were credited to Stronach. The error
was corrected so census data gives the total population as shown in the table above. However, statistics which
further break down the population have not been corrected. The census wili not be correcting those figures.
Estimate of Ancestry and Foreign 1.anguage Speaking at Home - 1980 U.S. Census STF 3A and PHC 80-3, Table 3

rsons-~ to 11 Years
Old Who Speak A
Language Other Than
English At· Home

Municinalit
Manistee County
Filer Township
Manistee City

Total
107

Over Who Speak A
Language Other Than
English At Home

Percent of the
Total Who Speak
English ~ot Well
or Not At All

Total
667
47
219

1.9\

4

57

~-i '
,p-

I(:

Percent of the
Total Who Speak -.
English Not Well
or Not At All

Percent of Persons,
In Manistee County,
5 Years and Over Who
Lived Outside of
Michi2an in 1975

5.1\
4.3\

3. 6\
4.8\

.-

-

1.7\

�&lt;_,$;:\ ;

\..

~

-,

}
/

1980 U.S. Census Ancestry lnfon11ation
S.T.F. 14
Manistee County Plannin&amp; Commission July 19, 1983

Total Population
White PollUlltion
~ltiple Ancestr

......
. ....,...•... ...... ..,..
• ...

,... . ,...
....... ..... ....
.
.c
.c ...
.c
0
...
0
.,, .,,Ii .,,0
• .c •

,...

.

II

II

II

C

I
t,I
t,I

I

Manistee Co.
Filer Twp.
Manistee City+

II

u

II

.c

!.!

... ...
.,, .,, .,,Ii
.c

.c

0

0

Ii

0

t:I

.

C

.t:

Ii
i::

-.

........ ....
...Ii. .......
Ii
... ...
t• ... .... .• •.
C

....... .... .......c. '5 .......i ....... a .c....... ....,,.u ....
e
.... •.
• .5 .... l. t
t.. ~ .5

Ii

tllnicipal ity

....t-

,...

.t:

.

.c

.

.t:

:a

Cl)

.t:
u
C

Cl.

C

.c

.
6

.t:
u

0

z

8

Cl)

....

C

C

:@

23,019122,61S 19,938 S204 29S4'276436J96Jl4? 30~34~316 4S~ 44~ 33~ 20~ I~ 69 69 48
2,143 2,124
964 sss ·usl 20 391151 12 S6 13
72 29 2 1
2 2
7,665 7,447 3: 206 16S2 718 75 08,
25 17
622 347 250 121 10 2 4 21
5 22

681

.
II

M

u

....Ii. a,.~
..• Q

M

II

::,

t:I

9
2
-

-

4

0

Cl.

4

2
-

.,,

....
II

-•.

II

i:

C

. g.• f.

Cl)

.c
0

.c

0

z

- 12St1S612141

- · 6 95 171
- 348 142 600

~In early ·1980 U.S. Census counts, Stronach Township's population was reported as 826 a'l,d Manistee City as 7,566. This was in error, · u gg people in irou:
quarters (Heights Care Center) were credited to Stronach. The error was corrected so census data aives the total population as shown in the table above
•Indicate a sl1nificant portion of the population in the aunicipality has the indicated ancestry backiround in comparison to the county t : _ _ / t a l
proportions. This does not exclude the possibility of ethnic c01111unlties within areas of a aunicipality. Manistee County has a hi&amp;her
.
proportion of Polish ancestry in c011parison to Michiaan as a whole.
However, statistics which further break dovn the population have not been corrected.

.

The census will not be correctin( those figures.

-~

·

�"'~

i'

I

)

•.'",)

Resident-Seasonally Adjusted Average Population - Based on 1980 Census Advance Final Counts (April 1981) and Household Data Tapes (July 1981)

I
~

r-bnicipality

Penn•
anent
Pop.
(a)

Total
Housina
(b)

Ma!)istee County
Filer Township
Manistee City

23,019
2,143
7,66S

Vacant/
Seasonal
Housing

8,490
718
3,036

3,74S

(d)

~ve. Pop./
Household
(afc•e)

Seasonal
Pop.
(e·d•f)

2.68*
2.98*
2.s2•

10,106t
203
S32

,

A
I

Penaanent
Housina
(b-d•c)

12,23S
786
3,247

68

211

Potential
Peak Peraanent and
Seasonal
Pop. Peak
Pop.
(e·b•1)

Seasonally
AdJ. Ava.
Pop.
((1•S)•(a•7);12•h)
27,178 ♦

33,001·
2,342
8,182

2,226
7,880

*Figure fr011 U.S. Census, figuring 239 people do not live in housing units; rather in convents, donas, Jail, transient, ■edical facilities.
This will cause a variation of 140 in the City and 99 in Manistee Township.
·
.
••
The County total figures represent s1.111s of the !Nnicipal figures below the111, as a more accurate representation of the county.

♦

Tourist-Seasonallf Adjusted Average Population - Based on 1980 Census Advance Final Counts (April 1981) and Household Data Tapes (July 1981)

r-bnici~
Manistee County
Filer Township
Manistee City
♦

Est. I
of Motels,
Hotels,
Cabins
(i)
24
2
7

Est. I
of Motel,
Hotel, Ca•
bin R0011s
(i•20•j)
480
40
140

Est . Peak
Motel,
Hotel
Cebin Pop.

(J · l•k)

Carnp
Sites
(1)

1,440
120
420

1,437
0
117

Potential
Peak Camp
Site Pop.
(1•8•m)

11,496
0
936

Potential •
Peak
TouristTransient
Pop.
(k•m•n)
12,936
-120
1,356

-

Potent.l a!
Peak
Penaanent
I Seasonal
Pop. Peak
Pop.
(1•n•o)

Seasonal
and Tourist
Adj. Avg.
Pop. per
Day

46,117 ♦

30,957 ♦

2,462
9,538

2,280
8,322

(h•(k•.4S)+(m·.27) ■ p)

The County total figures represent surns of the municipal figures below them, as a more accurate representation of the county.

'

�/-

(
\

..

30
29
28
27
26
25
24
23
22

FILER TOWNSHIP
POPULATION PROJECTIONS

..
...
2,61rl

/

.:

//

/
✓2,440

2,260 ... /
2. 193

_..~2, ;.~2":i 50

)..•2': 080

21
20
19
18
17
16

\

,021

VI

]15
l-&lt;14
"'O
c::13
;,
____..c: 12
·c::
•'"411
§10
'j 9
cd
8

,033

~

;,

g, 1
0..

6
5
4
3
2
1
0
1870 1880 1890 1900 1910 1920 1930 1940 1~50 19601970 1980 1990 2000

DECENNIAL .YEARS
Projections:
Population in 1990:
·population in 2000:

2,080-2,260; most likely near 2,180
2,150-2,670; most likely near 2,440

Manistee Cot.mty Planning Commission
January 1985
-35-

�,,.

FILER TOWNSHIP
·- HOUSING· DISTRIBUTION

houses

per square mile:
200 and over
40 - 199.9

~
~

CJ

20 - 39.9

1 - 19.9

Zero

-36-

----- ·------ ·-·-. -

... -

·•·- -··

\

�~
•
' ,.-------- ,

~~~

:-· .~. _-_..,.., ;:..•·:1::~~f'&gt;r-~::•,·~)::-_,_,

:

.. .

,!.•

·-:., :I;_

. ___ ,, I

·,.,,,. ·;. :·: ; ,;, ;:

:.:,·--~

... -

:,·: ►;~'=~:'~~~:.:~~i/~-~

,. : : .. , .: ,. . .f;:::,:!:·.:.'. :· ';1:...

1980 Census Data Advance Final Counts (A ril 1981) - Count of Housin
1980 Housin&amp;
1970 Ho:isin1

Units
\ Housin&amp; Chan&amp;e 1970-1980

t•

Manistee County
Filer Township
Manistee City
(Filer City/Oak Hill)

9,460
623
·2,898

...t

+29 .3\
+26. 2\
+12 . 0\

12,235
786
3,·247
(322)

ril 1981 and household data tapes, July 1981
Housint. Households. Seasonal Homes - 1980 Census Data Advance Final Counts

... ... . .:
1980 Pop.

ill

Total
Housin&amp; Units

Year- round
PeT11anent
Households

ill

ill

8,490

12,235
·1116
(322)
3,247

23,019
· 1111
Manistee County
2,143
Filer Township
(11S6)
(Piler City/Oak Hill)
3,036
7,665
Manistee City
*Ficure .fro■ U.S. Census, ficurin&amp; 239 people do not live in housin&amp; units; rather
etc. · This vil1 cause variation in _the .City (140) and Manistee Township (99).

I
CA

-...J
I

-• .·

"'"

. .... ~ ·

, : ;;, . ,

• ..•4

•• •

People Per
Vacant and
Year-round
Percent
Seasonal
Pe1111anent
Group
Seasonal
Houses
House
Quarters
ill
(AfC•D)
31\
3,74S
2.
611*
239
9\
68
2.911*
-o-•
N/A
-o-•
6\
211
2,411·
140•
in convents, dor■s, jail, transient, ■edical facilities,

"'"

...

.

.

.....•

"'"

. .. .. , . '

,;"'•

;

··· : ·

· ····: ~

·;: .

--

1:

·......

..

�~

'

I

,)
r '·

~anistee County Detailed Housing Characteristics - 1980 U.S. Census PHC 80-3, Table 5
Year-round Housing Units
Percent With:

1'l.lnicioalltv
1
(A

00

Manistee County
Filer Township
Manistee City

Total
9,901
742
3. 231

Percent
Percent
Percent
Built in
Built
Built
in Years
in Years
1939 or
1970-1980 1940-1969 Earlier
20.8\
20.5\
7.8\

35. ◄\

. 43 . 8\

47.3\
, 23. 1'

32.2\

69.1\

S or More
Houlln1 Units
in a Structure•
3.2\
0 . 5\

Water From
1'l.lnlcipal
Central
or Private
Public Heat ln1
Air
Utility Suooly Sewer Svstea Conditlonint

40.7\
44.5\
99 . 5\

a.o,

35.9\
3.8\•
98.9\

77.5\

I or ~lore
Complete 3 or More
8athrooas
Bedrooas

5. 8\

s. 1'

89.4\
89.6\

7.3\

94.2\
95.8\
97.5\

52.1\
66.3\
53.6\

.

·

I

•Percentaees in this ·column appear as reported by the U.S. Census. Manistee County Planning Department contends the percentaaes are wrona.
1-bltiple housin1 is not that frequent. Percentaaes marked by this footnote should read 0\. Others should be ■ ade lower.
•Percentaaes appear as reported by the U.S. Census. Manistee County Plannin1 Depirt ■ ent contends the data ls wron1. Percentaaes marked by this
footnote should read zero, as there is no public or utility water service offered· in the respective 11Unicipalities . Total percenta1e for
the county should also be adjusted. The Census Bureau staff reported people had a problem understandin1 the question.

.. =}-

Estimated Housin1 Heating Data - Summary Tape File 38
Heatin&amp; Fuel

· Heatin&amp; Equipment

l,bniclpal lty
Manistee County
Filer Township
Manistee City

Total
Year-round
Housin1
Units
9,831
743
3,232

Stea11 Central
Room
Room
Floor,
Wam Electric
Other
Wall, Heaters Heat
or
Air
Heat
Hot
Built-in Pipe less
With If/out
Wate1 Furnace
Pump . Electric Furnace
Flue
Flue
1,431
166
630

5,451
452
2,072

84
6

48

387
21
75

3)2

18
70

982
38

134

277

41

8

Fireplace
Stove
Portable
Room
Heater None
1,062
JO
18

48
J

Bottle,

LP
Gas

Gas

3,758
440
Z,674

811
44
14

-

Coal
Elect. Oil Coke Wood Other None
433 2694
2J 181
130 200

16

2

768
28
15

3
3

7

�1.::::\

~!

'

' -~#·/

)

......

.,.)

'

Detailed Housinr Characteristics - 1980 U.S. Census' PHC 80-3, Table 5

Municipality
I
CA
CD
I

Manistee County
Filer Township
Manistee City

Total

Occu~iei Housin1 Units
Median Selected
Monthly Owner
Percent With
Costs (Dollars)
1 or More
Specified Owner
Vehicles
Occupltd With
Available
A Mort1a1e

Percent
With Householder
Moved Into Unit
1979 to March
1980

90.4\'
94.4\
82.2\

15 . 3\

8,490
718

,lO. 2\

3,036

17.0\

Median Selected
Monthly Owner
Costs (Dollars)
Specified Owner

Median Goods
Rent (Dollars)
Sp•ci!ied

Occupitd, Not
Morttued

$319
$333
$298

Renter
Occupied

$201
$213
$190

$138

$140
$139

Estieated Are of Housin&amp; • 1980 Census Data - Summary Tape File 38
Total
Year-round
Housinr
1-ltn ic i pa 11
Manistee County
Filer Township
Manistee City

Uni

9,831
743
3,232

1979
to
March
1980
197
29
17

\
I
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

1975
to
1978

2\

688
65
82

4\

1\

\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

r'.'

7\
9\
3\

1970
to
1974

\
I
I

1,175: 12\
58: 8\
154 : 5\
I
I
I
I
I

1960
to
1969

\
I
I

1,422 : 14\
132: 18\
254 : 8\
I
I
I
I
I

1950
to
1959

•

\

I

1,181: 12\
164 : 22\
·252 : 8\
I
I
I
I
I

---

1940
to
1949
901
55
239

1939
or
Earli

\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
l

I
I
I
I

9\
7\

7\

4,337
239
2,233

\
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

44\

32\
69\

�ECONOMY
Filer
Township's
internal
economy
is
dominated by
manufacturing and retail activities.
The domination of these two
segments of the township's economic activity is so great, that
all other categories of economic activity in the township account
~o~ less than 20 percent of the total
jobs provided by businesses
in Filer.

\

Employment .and Business Estimates Table
(from Analysis of Employment and Business in Manistee County, 1992
County Planning Commission)
of Businesses
in Twp. (Job
Providers)
#

s.

I.

c.

Code

-1,02, 13 .
07-08 ~
14-17
20-39
40-49
50-51
52-59
60-65
70-89
91-97

Classification

Agriculture,
n/a
Mining
Agriculture Ser8
vices &amp;! Const.
Manufacturing
3
Transportation,
1 (or 2)
Utilities,
Sanitation
Wholesale
1
Retail
18
Finance, Insurance,
9
Real Estate, Etc.
Services
~o
Public
1 (or 3)
Administration

TOTALS

60

Jobs
in Twp.

'Y.
#

Jobs
n/a

n/a

45 1/2

5

410
3

20

234
26 1/2

9%

1 /2'l.

5'l.

51 1 /2'l.
1/2'1/.

30%
4%

1/2%
29'1.
3 1 / 4'l.

1 1 /2'l.

~

L

47

6'l.

7

1'1/.

792 1/2

i. Total
Jobs in Co.

19%
4'l.
231/.
3

100%

The manufacturing segment of Filer Township's economic
picture is attributable mainly to Packaging Corporation of
America Mill
in Filer City.
PCA of Illinois is wholly owned by
Tenneco Corporation of Texas • . The mill is one of several in the
corporate
conglomeration.
The
PCA mill
in Filer City
manufactures the corrugated medium for cardboard boxes.
The
corrugation, and final assembly into boxes,
is done elsewhere.
Shipments from the plant are by rail and truck.
The PCA mill
owns the head, or end, . of the Chessie System Railroad line.
This
August 21, 1987

-40-

1 /2'l.
lOO'l.

�mill accounts for over half the exported manufactured product
from Filer Township and a significant amount of the total exports
from Manistee County.
The PCA mill has
historically
maintained
a regular
reinvestment of capital
into the Filer City location and on
occasion has sought industrial rehabilitation tax incentives from
Filer Township for parts of the capi~al program.
Recent
investments have
been
oriented
toward
pollution control
equipment, transition of boilers (for steam&gt; from natural gas to
coal, coal
dock facilities,
and increased
efficiencies of
operation.
Competition in this industry has been intense in the
recent past, and has a good chance to continue to be so.
Use of
ca~dboard, and sale of cardboard, not only faces more , intense
competition from other cardboard · manufacturers but also is not
obtaining a share of the market where plastics, styrofoams, and
similar products have made inroads.
With this background,
concern at a local
level for the health and continued operation
of the mill may be warranted.
Traditionally, the PCA mill has been a county leader in
terms of wage and benefit packages for its workers.
In the past
four years, other heavy industries in the Manistee Lake area have
assumed that role.
Employment at Packaging extends beyond those
directly employed at t~e mill.
PCA contracts/subcontracts with
logging operators ·. and truck drivers/firms for the purchase and
delivery of its raw material.
Within Manistee County, an additional estimated 222 jobs are
directly dependent on the. PCA mill in addition to Packaging's
employees.
PCA uses a hardwood -- aspen, poplar -- pulp log for
its - paper-making process.
While other wood can be used, the
company has been becoming particular as to the type of wood
purchased.
PCA buys pulpwood -- by the pulp cord hauled by bolt
truck or chips hauled by semi -- from an ar,ea as far as Mio.
A
circle extending as far as Cadillac is common, and purchases have
been made from distances farther than Mio.
Increasingly, a problem faced by PCA.
and all
of the
logging industry -- is the . fractionalization of land into parcels
which are smaller than 40 acres in size.
For a pulpwood logging
operatior,
it is estimated b)i. foresters at PCA that 25 to 35
ac~es are necessary simply to break even on costs to set up
logging equipment at a site.
A wood chipping operation has a
requirement of 40 acres or more for an ability to break even
after set up costs.
While this calls for large parcel, or
stringent forest preservation goals for land use in much of
Manistee and other counties, there appears little opportunity for
such measures in Filer · Township.
PCA owns large parcels of
forestland in Filer, but soil fertility and thus potential for
regenerative timber management practices,
or growing of hybrid
poplar trees, is not practical.
The second major industry in the township was Manistee Forge
Corporation.
The Forge plant,
tied to the nation's steel
industry, shared the problems related to steel manufacturing in
general.
It closed down in 1985-6~
Between the Manistee Forge
August 21, 1987

-41-

�(

Corporation site and Packaging Corporation of America is the site
for a proposed cogeneration plant, to use waste products from PCA
along with coal to create steam.
The steam will be used to
generate electricity
(for sale to Consumers Power Company&gt; and
then sell the steam to PCA.
Other manufacturing . firms in
the township are small
operations wholly owned by an individual who lives in the area.
Those firms are _c haracterized as having ..fewer than 10 employees
and remain largely anonymous in the community.
The second major segment of Filer Township•s economy is the
retail sector, reflecting the township·s position as a city-edge
shopping mall _ area.
Two shopping areas are·· located in the
township, Cypress Street Plaza and the shopping center associated
with K-Mart.
Filer Township ha&amp; the only shopping ,malls in
Manistee County
with the possible exception of Shopper's
Square within -the Manistee downtown area.
The largest grocer in
the county is also located in one of Filer's shopping centers.
Both shopping areas are nearly adjacent to the Manistee City
limits and front on U.S.
31, the major artery approaching
Manistee City from the south.
The strip of development which
includes the shopping malls and other
retail and service
enterprises draws shoppers from the city and much of the Manistee
Lake area hinterland.
The hinterland is loosely defined as
extending sou~h to the Sauble River, east to the Manistee-Wexford
County line, north to Arcadia, but excluding the northeast corner
of Manistee County &lt;Copemish area&gt;.
Sources of employment and economic activity are listed
below.
The listing is or.ganized according to the Standard
Industrial
Classification
Manual
CU~S.
Government Printing
Office, 1972&gt;i and based on the · Manistee County S.I.C. List,
1982, Manistee County Planning Commission, and personal knowledge
of members of the Filer Township Planning Commission.

February 19, 1988

-42-

�FILER TOWNSHIP

COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRY

LAND OCCUPATION

1985

-43-

-. - ... ... -

Dlanis~ee Coun~y Planninn Conunission

·

--·-·--·-•...... - -- ----- ·- -···-----. . ~-·- - ---- ·---·----·- ·

···-- ~

--- -- -

�S.I.C. Groups:
A.
Agriculture, .Forestry and Fishing
Seven major part-time farm operations
Slawinski ·
Preuss, Chuck
Preuss, Herman
Sievert, Frances
Sievert, .Fred
Sievert, Jack
Wresins.ki
Major land
ownership · by Packaging Corporation of
America for forestry.
U.S. Forest Service Distr:ict Ranger Office, U.S.-31
· . South
Steinberg's Landscaping, Maple· Road
\
Dufon's Landscaping, Canfield Road
B.
Mining .
· Transient oil and gas drilling and recovery operations.
Salt brine .. wells associated with industries in two
adjacent municipalities.
C.
Construction .
Sul_'l-Lite Glass Company, ·Nelson · street
Krolczyk~ Skiera, Red Apple Road
Todd Ketz, U.S.-31 ·South
Wright · Carpentry, S~- Maple Road
Bruce Elli&amp;, _U.S.-31 South
Schrader's Masonry, Twenty Third Street
Field Plumbing and Heating, Nelson Street
Justmann·s Plumbing and Heating, Nelson Street
Carl's Excavating, Cherry Road
Rademaker Liquid Dust Layers, U.S.-31 South
Industrial Welding, Oak Hill
D.
Manufacturing ·
Packaging Corporation of Americ~, Filer City
E.
Transportation -and Public Utilities
Centel Cabl~ Televi~icin, 1213 U.S. 31 South
Davis Cartage Company, Oak Hill ·
Filer City U.S. Post Office, Filer City
_Filer · Township .Water Department, Oak Hill
Kowal~ki " Trucking Ca.,·oak Hill
F.
Wholesale Trade
Welsh Distributing Co. (Beverages&gt;, Oak Hill
G•
.. Retail . Trade
Building Material&amp;
Linke Lumber Ca., Filer City
·Department Stores
. S.S. Kresge ·Co. &lt;K-Mart), U.S.-31 South
Food Store&amp;
Plumb's Inc.,. U.S.-31 South
Eberhard' &amp; Red Onion, U.S. -3_1 -South
T -&amp; · B Market, Filer City
Witts End, Filer City
February 19, 1988

�H.

Automotive Dealers and Service Stations
Manistee Ford-Mercury, Inc., U.S.-31 South
Yates· Chevrolet, Inc., Oak Hill
Phil's Auto, u.s.-31 South
Oak Hill Service, Oak Hill
Clark, u.s.-31 South
Imperial Oil Co., inc., U.S.-31 South
Apparel and Accessories
Furniture and Home Stores
The Drapery Den, E. Preuss Road
Tandy Corporation &lt;Radio Shack&gt;, U.S.-31 South
Eating and Drinking Places
Ruth's Anchor Inn, U.S.-31 South
Armedo's Pizzeria, U.S.-31 South
· Elias Brothers Big Boy Restaurant, u.s.-31\ South
Michigan Pizza Hut, Inc., U.S.-31 South
Wendy's Restaurant, U.S.-31 South
Bungalow Inn, U.S.-31 South
Filer City Tavern, Filer City
Gorley·s Tavern, Oak Hill
Miscellaneous
Steinberg Monument Sales, Maple Road
Revco .Discount Drug Centers, Inc., U.S.-31 South
Finance, Insurance and Real Estate
First of America Bank - .Manistee Branch Office, U.S.-31
South
Security National Bank Southgate Branch Office, U.S.-31
South
Filer Ci ty Mill - Employees Credit Union, Filer City
Manistee County Federal Credit Union, U.S.-31 South
Lutheran Brotherhood (insurance&gt;, Preuss Road
Filer Township Economic Development Corporation, Oak
Hill
Joe Adamski, Real Estate, Oak Hill
Mount Carmel Cemetery, Maple Road
Trinity Lutheran Cemetery, Maple _Road
Services
Lodging Places
Day's Inn, U.S.-31 South
Hillside Motel, U.S.-31 South
Sunset Motel, U.S.-31 South
Personal Services
Karla's Shop, Maple Road
Gladys Lijewski's, Oak Drive
Business Services
Tye's Neon Signs, Oak Hill
Auto Repair (not sales&gt;
Band S Repair, Oak Hill
Tuff-Kate, Filer City
Schrader's Auto Shower, Oak Hill
· Miscellaneous Repair
Leroy's Lock(smith&gt; Shop, Oak Hill

February 19, 1988

�Bob Mikula, T.V. Repair, Oak Hill
Hanson Television Services, Merkey Road
DeCair Welding, Merkey Road
Holm and Sons · Septic Tank Service, Red Apple Road
Motion Pictures
Amusement and Recreation
Manistee Lanes, U.S.-31 South
Fo&gt;&lt; Hills Golf Course, Fo&gt;&lt; .,F arm Road
Slender You, U.S.-31 South
Health · Services
Legal Services
Educational Services
South (Madison) Elementary School, Oak Hill
G.E.D. Alternative Education, Filer City \
Social Services
Michigan Employment Security Commission, U.S.-31
South
Membership Organizations
Amalgamated Meat Cutters and Butcher Workmen Local
539 (Eberhard's)
Michigan Education Association, Oak Hill &lt;Madison&gt;
Michigan State Employees Association &lt;MESC&gt;
. United Food and Commercial Workers Local
&lt;Eberhard's)
United Food and Commercial Workers Local
&lt;Plumb's)
United Steelworkers of America Local 12585 &lt;PCA&gt;
Crooked Tree . Girl Scouts, Camp Little Deer,
Wildwood Road

J.

Filer Mill Community Club, Filer City
Gentlemen's Motorcycle Club, Oak Hill
Red Apple . Beach Association, Red Apple Road
Lakeland Association, Fo&gt;&lt; Farm Road
South Elementary Parent-Teacher Club, Oak Hill
Veterans of For.eign Wars Walsh Post 4499,' Oak Hill
Private Households
Unknown number employing domestics, etc.
Miscellaneous
Public Administration ~
Filer Township Board of Trustees, Oak Hill
Township
of
Filer,
Oak
Hill
(government
administration,
tax
assessment,
water
department, comm. ·dev., parks, etc.&gt;
Filer Township Fire Department, Oak Hill
Filer Township Planning Commission, Oak Hill

Filer Township is within an area of economic influence from
Detroit -- as is all
Manistee County -- for primary wholesale
distributorship and a retail ~center.
The township is within the
economic influence of : Traverse City for secondary wholesale and
retail shopping.
(Grand Rapids may also be . considered as having
:influence in ·this area, but Traverse appears to have an edge

of

February 19, 1988

-46-

�,-:;

based on ·. newspaper · circulation and political ties.&gt;
Filer
Township can be .,considered an inseparable part of the Manistee
Lake . area serving as .: a specialty-complete shopping area; with a
primary economic impact on the •five
municipalities around
Manistee Lake and a larger hinterland defined above.
Even though -the Manistee Lake area is politically divided
between five municipalities -- Manistee City, Manistee Township,
Eastlake Village, · Stronach Township a~d Filer Township -- the
pattern of commercial,
industrial and population concentration
around Manistee Lake clearly makes the area one social-economic
center.
It is difficult,
if not impossible, to isolate or
separate the economic activities and influence·s of the Manistee
Lake area by municipality.
Many of the statistics generated by
go~ernment agencies,
universities, and private research , services
do not generate data for local government units smaller than a
county.
&lt;This discussion presents data that is currently
available at
township level.
A summarization of county data
will be provided here, as the reader may review county plans and
reports for . detail.)
A compa~ison of the table of Labor Force Profile at the end
of
this section with the tabfe on Employment and Business
Estimates, illustrates that there js a great deal of commuting in
and out of Filer Township to a person's job.
Only 61 percent of
the people who .live in Filer Township and work, are employed in
the manufacturing· or retail
sector.
But over 80 percent of the
jobs provided in Filer Township are retail and manufacturing.
This comparison shows a · discrepancy.
It does not measure the
number of ~eople who live in-Filer Towriship, have a manufacturing
or retail
job, but still commute outside the township, and vice
versa.
The 1980 Census - Labor Force Table, following this section
shows the 1980 U.S. Census estimated travel time for workers who
do not work at home. • It is assumed that one can travel from any
home in Filer Township to any place of employment in Filer
Township within 14 minutes • .There are 164 residents of "Filer who
travel over 14 minutes to get to work.
Again,
this does not
measure those people who work outside Filer Township, but can get
to work in the Manistee Lake · area within 15 minutes.
It is
presumed the • reverse also
takes place,
with nonresidents
reporting to work in Filer Township.
The proximity to Manistee City, and being a part of the
Manistee Lake area places Filer Township in a geographical
position that involves several advantages:
ability to share a larger market area which supports a
larger based economy.
ability to share the Manistee Lake as an area port.
to be a · member of a community which is ~ble to support
railroad transportation.
ability to anticipate the growth of businesses, and
homes, which typically occurs at the outer edges of a
.City.

a

February 19, 1988

-47-

�(
·-._,1

ability to rely upon county-wide economic development
efforts with minimal investment at a township level,
with the· ability to benefit from employment anywhere in
the hinterland by inc~eased shopping activity in Filer
Township shopping areas.
In contrast, the township also experiences what is perceived
as some disadvantages to its location:
the possibility of
property taK · loss through annexation of township territory to
Manistee City, cost of infrastructure .development to accommodate
development and growth in the township,
land use management
problems associated with development pressures, environmental.
con·c:erns associated with development and heavy i'ndustry •
. In each case,
the negative impacts can be reduced or
eli'minated through planning and/or - enforcement of state s.tatutes.
1
Only with the issue of annexation does an apparent solution
require Michigan legislative action:
where annexation is no
longer an antagonistic relationship,
but becomes a process of
border changes through mutual planning and tax revenue sharing.
In that Filer Township is inseparable from the Manistee Lake
area and · Manistee County economy,
a summary of the Manistee
County 1982 Economic Adjustment Strategy is reviewed here:
By
use · of a citizen committee of the Manistee County
Planning Commission,
and subcommittees specializing in various
aspects of the . area's economy, along · with technical assistance
from the Michigan Department of Labor's Office of Industrial
Training,
an economic development program was prepared and
adopted as
the economic component of the Manistee County
Comprehensive Plan.
Membership of the committees included three
residents of Filer Township.
Both short and long-term projects
were developed.
The projects were then . integrated into a coordinated
and balanced strategy for economic retovery.
The
report
identifies
the
following ~ajor
problems:
1.
Continued high
unemployment
levels that
exceed those of the state and region.
2.
Lack of both new industry and growth or
expansion of existing bu~iness.
·
3.
Lack of consensus a» to the direction and
type of economy and quality of life desired
by the county.
4.
Relatively low level of tourism development.
5.
Historically low growth rates for income,
population, jobs and other economic indeKes.
6.
Under-utilization of . forest and agricultural
as~ets.
~
A 1 ac k of .1 eadersh i p . or unwi 11 i ngness of some
community ·
leaders
to
exerci~e
their
positions.
a.
Labor-Management . relations that historically
are characterized by mistrust, animosity and
February 19, 1988

-48-

�lack of respect and understanding of the
aspirations and needs of each other.
The lack of a coordinated and concerted
9.
effort to retain, as well as recruit new
industry to the
county,
"to
pull the
(economic) cart out of the mud" by creating a
consensus as . to what needs to be done in the
community ~nd marshalling the resources to
see that it is accomplished.
Other problems w.e re also identified including such
areas as conflicts between local units of government
· and media coverage of local news.
The subcommittees developed 44 projects to be
implemented
locally
to
start the effort to~ard
achieving a healthier economy.
CTwo of . those projects
involved firms in Filer Township
PCA and Drop
Forge.]
The major thrust of the strategy is to protect and
strengthen existing assets in the county.
Once this
base is firmly established, the next step is to expand
and also attempt to recruit or create additional
business.
Two major related projects are intended to improve
the capacity of the county to respond to economic
development - opportunities.
First,
an Economic
Development Office CEDO) with a full-time Director, has
been established for the purpose of coordinating the
efforts of the EDCs, IDCs, DDAs and other . local groups
involved in economic development.
It will develop an
industry
retention
program,
industry recruitment
project and develop a series of programs to expand the
capabilities, expertise and opportunities of local
small businesses.
(Second, · in] order to create an
improved environment
for more
Jobs and eHpanded
business, a
Manistee . Area-Wide
Labor Management
Committee has been created.
Its purpose is to provide
a means by which labor and management can work to
improve the Quality of Work Life in Manistee, improve
. productivity ·and foster new economic development for
Manistee County.
Other strategies involve the . coordination and
expansion of tourist attraction efforts both through
improved promotion
efforts and
_an upgrading and
expansion of facilities in Manistee County and emphasis
to · improve
and
expand
the utilization of the
agricultural
and
forest
resources.
Improved
utilization
of
present agricultural resources is
proposed.
A wood treatment plant tied in with improved
management practices is defined by various projects as
a means to improve thi~ sector of the economy.
The 44 projects over the next five years are
February 19, 1988

-49-

�predicted to cost Sl,793,500 and directly produce 142274 identifiable new jobs for the county ' s residents.
Just as importantly, a positive record of change,
progress and successful resolution of present problems
will have laid the foundation for renewed growth in the
1990's.
Although, on a county-wide basis, ~everal problems such as
unemployment,
underemployment,
low growth
rates, etc.
are
serious, Fi.ler Township residents tend not to have the problems
as severely as the county as a whole, or even in comparison to
Manistee City • . The tables at the end of this section show Filer
Township per capita income, median household or family income to
be 1 higher than the county's or · city's.
Unemployment rate
estimated by the U.S. Census for March 1980 i&amp; considerably lower
than the city ' s or county's. The Census data also indicates the
number of people below the poverty level
is also a lower
proportion of the total population for Filer than for the county
or city.
Economic issues in terms of agriculture or forestry in Filer
Township are not significant.
Manistee County Agricultural
Extension Agent, Gerald Draheim,
indicates there are only parttime (alternative income in addition to the farm operation) farms
in the township;
Sandy soils, with little or no fertility, do
not allow for competitive large scale farming in the township.
In addition, land values associated with urban sprawl do not
allow for economically feasible operations.
At this time only
four farm operations are active in the township.
Soil
limitations also have the same impact on forest operations.
Initially Packaging
Corporation of America purchased large
holdings for hybrid poplar development, but abandoned the proJ~ct
in Filer Township when it was found the tree requires a mo~~
fertile soil.
Timber . potential does , exist for
red pi•n·e
plantations, but there is currently · no local demand for pine ·of
any type.
There is current.ly a glut of pine available for
harvest in Manistee County.
·
Economic projections for Filer Township are not really
possible, in that it will be dependent . on two major companies:
Packaging Corporation of Americ. and Tondu Cogeneratian facility.
The remaining segments of the township's economy are tied to the
county's , economic projections as a whole.
Excerpts of the
projections offered in. the county Economic Strategy of 1982 are
offered here.
The
10-county
northwest
Michigan
region's
population growth in the last 14 years has generated
major expansion cf the non-manufacturing sectors of the
economy.
Government employment kept pace with the
economy's expansion.
However, manufacturing provided
no additional new jobs and the number of agricultural
jobs have declined dramatically.
February 19, 1988

-so~

�'_. "''3
· .. '
-- .
'

_)

The . region's
non-farm personal incomes also
increased dramatically and more than statewide averages
(184% vs.
130%). However, perhaps because of the high
percentage of retirees in the region,
and lower wage
levels in general, per capita income continues to trail
the state as a whole, as it did in 1970.
The .region has moved smoothly into the service
sector of the economy during the seventies.
However,
the manufacturing sector is stagnant.
Higher costs of
energy and consequent higher transportation costs may
have offset the historically lower wage levels of the
area.
The decline of auto related industry in . the
state, together with the perceived . business climate
have _ undoubtedly also. had their impact.
The area's
I
'quality of • life' . and rich natural resources continue
to be positive -factors for continued growth.
Manistee County and Filer Township have not been immune from
the effects of the national and state economies.
Indeed, the
closings of industries around Manistee Lake, in the early 1980s
can be attributed, at least in part, to . the national recession.
To a large extent Manistee County and Filer Township "have
not shared in the significant growth-trend of the region during
the 1970-80 decade.
Population increased regionally by 31.5%
compared to 12.9% for Manistee County" and 11.oX for Filer
Township.
· To some extent, this has resulted from a prevailing
attitude in the county of controlling and even limiting
growth.
There is an often heard comment that the City
of . Manistee does not wish to emulate Traverse City with
·some of the associated negative growth effects which
that city has experienced.
Development and growth will
likely continue to . occur in Manistee County at a
somewhat sl ewer pace than for the region as ·a whole,
unless definitive actions are taken to change present
policies and programs.
There are, however, m_a ny reasons for optimism
concerning those diverse elements which the county
possesses that could give ~rise to an improved economy
in the coming years.
Among them are the many basic
·tools' for development" already in place, including an
established
Filer
Township
Economic
Development
Corporation, and the newly established Manistee County
Economic Development .Office.
The physical infrastructure of the county Cwhich
is available
to benefit Filer Township] is most
impressive . and includes •· a modern Industrial Park in
Manistee City and another ona in Kaleva, all weather
harbor. and deep water port facilities, a long-term
commitment for
rail services,
30-mila access to
Interstate highway and a modern 5500 foot runway
airport. Other advantages the county possesses include
February 19, 1988

�1

'

_j

a highly skilled labor force, a newly formed Manistee
Area Wide
Labor
Management
Committee, eMcellent
training programs available through Region 10 CETA
office in Traverse City, and the Michigan Department of
Labor's · Office of Industrial Training, West Shore
Community College, vocational education programs and
organized and effective county and township government.
The county's · underlying stre~gth of its natural
resource
base · should
continue
to
contribute
significantly
to
its
economy
in
the
future,
particularly the burgeoning oil and gas industry, salt
mining and
chemical companies
and wo'od products
industries.
The county is represented by two financi~lly
healthy banks with sufficient assets to provide 'the
financial basis for eMpanded area economic development
· acti vi ti es. ·
Manistee -County offers an extremely high quality
of life with a varied four-season recreational climate.
There is an abundance of public land to encourage both
an expanded wood products industry and a viable tourist
industry.
The county's access to Lake Michigan as well
as its numerous inland lakes and streams provides some
of the finest fresh water recreation opportunities in
the county.
The economic outlook in Manistee County is largely
dependent _upon the health of the national and state
economy.
There is no immediate
forecast for a
significant major industry to locate into the county,
although recruitment efforts .continue by the Manistee
County Economic Development Office and local officials.
There is also no immediate significant employment
growth forecast
for Manistee County.
The basic
resource based manufacturing industries should benefit
as the national and state economies improve, but ncit to
the peak employment levels of 1979-1980.
Manistee County's opportunities are substantial,
yet
generally
under
utilized
or
ineffectively
exploited."
Those applic•ble ~o Filer Towriship include:
•Rich in natural resources;
oil and gas deposits
are presently being exploited from the Niagara Reef
which cuts diagonally through the county from the
northeast
to
the
southwest
Cand
now includes
exploration in . Filer Township].
Additionally, there
are brine wells in Filer and around Manistee Lake.
They were first primarily brought into production
before the turn .of the century and continue to provide
the basis for the location of· Martin Marietta, Morton
Salt and Chemical and Hardy Salt (Diamond Crystal].
February 19, 1988

-52-

�\.

J

· The county has extensive tracts of forestland owned by
both the · Federal and State governments as well as major
- holdings by private ~6mpanies.
Improved management
·. practices as ,well · as a means by which small holdings
could :be• harvested ~conomically could further improve
this . renewable resource" · Cto the . benefit of Filer's
major employer and for timber industry growth].
Manistee Lake and its connection to Lake Michigan
via the Manistee . River · 'm outh provides a sheltered
harbor for both pleasure and commercial boating as well
as industrial Great Lakes freighters.
At present, the
use of the -lake as a Great Lakes port remains dormant.
· Present usage is limited .. to importation of coal and
lignite, road salt, .limestone and gravel.
Only offloading facilities are in use; cn-loadi·n g facilities
are · almost · non-e&gt;eistent and have not been used in
years.
CTh·e lake/part is suitable , for use . by the new
Interlake Tug Barga System, . but is currently not
financially feasible.]
Additional
development of
· marina related support facilities including housing,
. entertainment
and
supportive
services
remains
· relativ~ly unaxpl~itad. ,
Expanded e&gt;eplot'tation
of tourism and outdoor
sports as·· i t · relates to the above -mentioned areas, as
~ell . a~ · forfishing, hunting, boating, hiking, biking,
golfing
and -.
other ·
activities
remain
as major
development opportunities, Cparticularfy with Manistee
Lake and Lake Michigan . frontage].
Manistee area is
literally not even on the map of some tourism material
produced by various agencies.
Its wildlife and fishing
.are unexcelled.
There is
a possibility of spin-off business
opportunities . from the
waste
prpducts
of local
industries.
These include the sludge from PCA for use
as a fer,tilizer, and
its old logs for firewotjd and
pallets.
Another by-product, dolomite limestone from
salt processing, has possible agriculture applications.
The labor force in Manistee and Filer is uniquely
skilled for · a northern coµnty with a high percentage
skilled in machine trades, bench work and processing
occupations.
With an 11-12 year average education,
long, steady employment histories and in their midthirties, the unemployed represent a unique resource
that can provide a stable base for new industry. The
stability· of . the work force is further attested to by
the fact that while the median income for the county is
BOX of the statewide median, -home ownership is 68~, the
same as the , statewide average.
·
In addition to the existing port facilities, the
county -is served by air, truck and rail, all of which
have additional capacities that can be put to use
February 19, 1988

�without
new
construction
configurations.

or

changes

in

present

Manistee has five industrial/commercial parks, including a
largely undeveloped commercial area in Filer Township.
"The . county •·s . governments
have · also provided basic
administration infrastructure
necessary for,
or to assist
additional
e~pansion,
~ncluding
Fil~r Township's Economic
Development Corporation.u There is also a history of utilizing
P.A. 198 and P.A.
255, · Plant and Commercial Rehabilitation Tax
Abatement Incentive programs.

\

February 19, 1988

-:54-

�Labor Force Profile ( 11'~o)
STP I 3

Count of Employed Persons 16 Years and Older
by Occupation
Managerial and Professional
Executive. Administration and Manager
Professional Specialty
Tech Sales and Administrative Support
Technicians and Related
Sales Occupations
Administrative Support
Service Occupations
Private Household Occupation
Protective Service Occupation
Service. exc. Protection and Household
Fat'111ing. Forestry. Fishing .
Precision. Production, Crafts. Repair
Operators, Fabrications, Laborers
Machine Operator. · Assembler, Insp.
Transportation and Material Moving
tfandlers, -Cleaners. Helpers. etc.

. Count of Persons, 16 Years and Older by Industry
Agriculture, Forestry. f-ishing • . Mining
Construction
Manufacturing
Nondurable Goods
Durable . Goods
. Transportat i.on
Communications 1 Other Public Utilities
Wholesale :rrade
Retail Trade
Financ~,·tnsurance, Real Estate
Business and Repair Service
Personal, Entertainment. Recreation~Service
Professional and Related
Health Services
Educational Services .
Other :Professional Related Services
Public Administration

...

County of
Manistee

Filer
Township

606
688

so

272

265
674
1,067

54
78
118

55
266
507

12
87
10
131

· ·11
34
352
16
421

121
59
52

433
105
161

452
496

13
26

46
107

1,438
1,275
231
171
142
1,355
338

248
137
19

640
400

37
91
959
274
1,211
1,203
443
451

57

\

-~:i..1

17
6

273

98
73
36

573

252

124
42
29
10

589
602
179
279

61
38
30
29

233
174
77

170

22..r

-55-

City of
Manistee

172

58
93

126

�(l
......

{:j..

\-.,, .).

-,-

t· .

~J.

\

•_./

•
l!

1980 Census Data - Summary Tape Fi le 38

.

Municipality
Manistee County
Filer Township
Manistee City

.Work
Outside
Total Work in
Labor Manistee Manistee
Co.
Co.
Force
7,969
829
2,906

562
19
111

6,692
705
2,575

Worker 16 Years and Over in 1979
Transportation to Work
Personal
Work
Vehicle
Personal
Outside Not . ReDrive
Vehicle
Public
Michigan ported
Carpool
Alone
Trans. Walk Other
34

559

12

192

so

5,101
628 .
1,830

121
12
42

1,375
114
423

703
27
430

· Work
at

Home
246
10

78
10
19

59

I

V1

°'
I

1980 Census Data - Summary Tape File 38

Munici?&gt;ality
Manistee County
Filer Township
Manistee City

5 Min.
or Less
601
22
324

5-9
Min.
2,164
284
1,216

Travel Time For Worlcers Not l'!orkin
20-29
10-14
15-19
Min.
Min.
Min.
1,921
299
880

1,059
111
192

849
' 30
68

At Home
30-44
Min.
692
·-19
87

45-59

Min.
152
4
19

60+
Min.
154
33

�r

(

l

'-•. 7

~

~J

;·

Wlnistee County Estimated Labor Force Dau ._ 1980 U.S. Census; PHC 80-3 Table 3 &amp; 4
-In Civilian Labor Force the
Last Week of March 1980
Persons
16 Years
Old and
Older

lllnicipality
I
1./1

......
I

Total

Workers

UnnJ)loyed

Percent
of Total
Civilian
Labor
Force

Persons 16 Years .
and Over in the
Labor Force in 1979
Percent
Unemployed
15 or Hore
Total

Weeks

17,587
9,398 7,624
1,429
15.2\
14 . 8\
10, 76S
77
1,624
906
801
8.5\
1,005
10.8\
Piler Toi.-nship
3,297 2,803
391
5,893
11.9\
3,752
14 . S\
lanistee City
IA household is any eroup of people, or one person, livin&amp; in a housin&amp; unit .
•4 family is at least two people related by blood or aarria&amp;e livin&amp; in a housin&amp; unit.
Ranistee Cpunty

•

Soninstitutionalhed Persons
16-64 Years Old
..
Percent
With I
Work
Disability
Total
13,952
1,369
4,576

11.1\
8.8\

9.0\

Per Capita
lncoae
in

Median

Dollars

19711

Dollars

House-

holds•

~

Private
Wa1e/Salary
Worker

Federal
Gov't
Worker

State
Gov't
Worker

Local
Gov't
Worker

Manistee County
Filer Township
Manistee City

7,969
829
2, 906

5,995
688
2,306

143
18
26

165
15
89

915
69
307

SelfEmployed
Worker
672
37
-162

I·

Families•

$14,351 $17,281
$18,542 $20,950
$13,789 $18,504

$6, 182
$6,623
$6,466

Estimated Count of Employed Persons by Class of Worker - Su111111ary Tape File 38
Total
Labor

Jnco■ e

in 1979

Unpaid
Family
Worker
79
2
16

-· -.

�,-

,.,..

~

(
'-

-

!

t':··--1
0 ·~

\ ..._,,·

\ __)

\

(...,_.J

.,·

. ._,

Esti ■ated

Jncoae and Poverty Data~ 1980 U.S. Census PHC 80-3, Table 4

~mid alit

Per Capita
Inc011e
In
1979
Dollars

Median Inc011e
In 1979
Dollars
Households
F111ilies

.

I

V'I
00

I

Manistee County

Filer Township
Manistee City

$6,182
$6,623
$6,466

$14,351
$18,542
$13,789

$17,281
$20,950
$18,504

22,738
2,143
7,520 '

TotaJ

.

lnc011e ll
1979 lelov
125 Percent
of Poverty
Level

lncoae

Total•

_.:,; ....

Persons For wn011 roven ~tatus 1s oetera1ned

65 Years

Percent

2,443 .

10.7\

104
766

4,9\

10.2\

and Over
530
21
227

512
25
175

742

32
239

230
7
64

3,664

150
1,171

*Total persons nwabers 1iven in this coluan vill not alvays · equal total population for each respective IIUllicipality. C011bini~1 of E.D. and
block data was done to produce statistically accurate results for each ■unicipality. The 1reat'1 the variation froa actual population
counts, statistical variation should correspond in the same ■ anner.

+)-:?:~

,/'

.-:-• •·• .• }

�COMMUNITY FACILITIES &lt;INFRASTRUCTURE&gt;
This section is a quick review of the utilities and public
facility systems available to residents of Filer Township.
The
full range of public services includes those provided directly by
Filer Township, those provided by private utility companies, and
thqse provided by other government ·units such as county, state,
board of education, etc.
\
With many services, File~ Township is serviced as a whole,
or i~ conjunction with~ other municipal governments.
All of
Filer Township is within the boundaries of the Manistee Public
School System which . services the greater Manistee Lake area.
In
Filer Township the school system maintains an elementary building
-- South Elementary
for grades three and four.
School
buildings for students in Kindergarten through second grade and
fifth grade · through 12th grade are north of Filer Township.
The
township is within the immediate service area of the principal
Maniste• County Public Library building
All of Filer Township is within the Manistee Intermediate
School District,
and within the service - area of West Shore
Community College.
' All · of . Fi 1 er Township is serviced by Michigan Bell Telephone
Company, via the Manistee 723~ exchange.
The township-~ through contract to a private company-provides door-to-door solid waste collection.
Refuse is taken to
a private landfill, in compliance with the ;Manistee County Solid
Waste Management Plan.
The entire . township receives police protection · from two
agencies, both headquartered outside Filer, but within two miles
of the township's north border.
The Man~stee County Sheriff's
Department provides police, jail, civil service,
animal control,
detective, marine patrol, canin~ and other court services.
The
Michiga~ S~ate - P6lice Post
(77)
provides police, specialized
investi~ation,
canine : services.
Other eme~gency services are
provided by West Shore Hospital and Manistee County for ambulance
_service;
federal-county coope~ative emergency services planning
· for the event of natural disaster or war;
and fire protection
provided by the Filer Township Volunteer Fire Department.
· UTILITIES
Electri~ity in Filer Township is provided by two separate
vendors.
Most of the township is serviced by Consumers Power
Company of
Jackson,
Michigan
(see Electric Utilities Servic&amp;
Area.s map at the end of this . section) .
Consumers has thF.'
capability to provide multiple phase service to most of its
August . 21, 1987

-59-

�service area, and in the - ~orth
and northeast
sections of the
township already , has an electrical distribution system in place
to accommodate large-demand users.
, West Michi~an Rural
ElEctrical
Cooperative
Ca federallyassisted company under the rural electrification act) provides
service ' to th~ southwest corner of· the township.
While the
Cooperative 2an · provide service to larger. customers, it does not
· have the appropriate distribution
system in
place within Filer
Township.
Michigan _ Consolidated Gas Company operates natural
gas
distribution lines in much of
northern Filer' Township.
The
Natural · Gas Service Areas Map at
the end of this section shows
the extent of - their available service area.
Given the demand-volume. of
business -- gas lines can be extended to ~ill ~n areas
in the northern part of the township~
A corridor
along Maple
Road also has -· the . potential
for expansion, as was done along
South County Line Road,
mainly to service Driftwood Village
Mobile . Home Park in Mason County.
Two post offi-ces service Filer Township.
First is the Filer
City post Office -~hic~ provides post
office boxes fer ~esidents
of
the com~unity of
Filer City.
The Manistee Post Office
provides ci~y _deli •very _to Oak Hill
resident~ and rur~l delivery
to the remainder of
the township
as shown on the map with this
section.
Cable television is av-ilable to an area of
the town5hip
similar t6 Michigan Consolidated Gas's service area.
Th~ Cable
Television Service Areas map ,;l.t the end of ·this section ;;ho;..is the
area wh~re Centel Cable - . T.V. generally has lines
iG place ~or
customer service.

WATER, SEWER AND DRAINAGE
drair•s•,
31~
Except for
Manistee
County
agricultural
stormwater drainage is associated with the Michigan Department c,f

August 21, · 1987

-60-

�Highw_a ys; .. Manistee - County· roads, or private parking lots.
In
each·~ase, - the _maintenarice and
.~P~~at{on · of
the . drains are
done . fn .. conjunction ,;,'with the
■· Great
tr~nsportatio~ facility;
.·
Lakes
The ' ~anistee Co~n~y Dr~in
Cable
Commissioner
maintains Green
D
L~ke Count~ Agritultural Drain.
Area
Geherally,
county drains ~ere
constructed to- provide drainage
of
wetlands
or
moist
8
u
•
agricultural
. lands · so
the
• ii
ser~ice area can be used for
farm · purposes.
Normally in
Manistee County
with the
ll
•
•
preponderance of -- well-drained
sandy~ soils
-- _agricultur~l
·drains
are
not
needed.
However, -i~ parts of Sections
COMMUNITY ANTENNA TELEVISION
25,
30,
35 · and 36 ·of Filer
SERVICE AREA
Township, heavier s 'oi ls and
poorly drainec{so.ils are found •.
As shown on the County Drain
map, ·_ at the end ·:- of · this sec.tion, most of Section 30 is serviced
by-_ a c .o unty drai'n. ·
~Filer Township. does not have a sewer system.
Sanitary sewer
and · commercial _wa~te -: di·s ·posal is accomplished by use of ManisteeMa_son:,·Di strict· Health Department-approved • septic tanl&lt; and dr-ain
field · or similar system.
I~ the late 1970s the township was
par-tic::ipating · in- -' the _South West
Manistee
County Utilitie&gt;s
Auih6rJty ._ with the fi~e other municipa:ities ~round Manistee
Laket at~e~~ting to .seek federal
grants-i~-aid
to upgrade
M~ni5tee City·s _se~age treatment plant and construct collector
lines a~ound Manisfe~ Lake.
Design work h~s been done for Filer
Township for collector li~es tp service roughly the same ~rea as
the township's _ water system curr-ently services.
Financing
at tempts
have
. been
unsuccessful
~r.d thiree of
tr,e f i VP.
municipalities. aited to not particip~te in the system.
At this
time it, . is -unlikely sewer
lines will be constructed in Filer
Township.
Manistee City is proceeding with 1.1.pgrac-ir1q its ;;ewer
. treatme~t plant en its own.
The Filer Township Water Department provides municipal water
to the F~l~r City ~nd greater Oak Hill
area wit~ three water
w2l_ls _tsae map entitled _Fi. ler Township Water Eyi;;t~·•m).
luhi.le the
~~ter sy~tem does not
pr~vent yround~ater
po: ~uticn from septic
;;ystems . in t:-,e rel ati ve-1 ·r de-nse pr,p....11 .;,.ted ;:,,-.;;,~-=- o-f the tm-.nshi rs,
it da&amp;i ~rcvi~F a water ~cur~e which is not likely to be
c~~taminat2d
from septi~
sy~tems.
ror
th1s r8aso~, smallP~
i:,-;;.r-ce!. siz:s can ~1e all"c,w-::d --- ir; contr-~st to_ l'JthEr
a :-eas ,:if the
towr-s:,i p,

wat:1:?r
sy5tem
is cwrren-t:l'y' cldequ,;-..te fo...- 2:dst:-1rac3 use,.
anticip~ted demands. · and e~pansions rFsult
in som@
r1E·-fiClPiiC:le;;. _
The fc,lfrn,-ing is i~Lo_ted -4rc:im Fi.J,:?r T.£.;~i)&lt;;-hi_g__W~t~•r

The
-Ho~ever, ·
Ai.Jgust -~

r,

198"7

J1

•

�System Extension Preliminary Engineering Study summary by Gosling
Czubak Associates: of Traverse City, May 1985.
, Fi.l er·· Township• s ,water system · · has an adequate
. supply to furni~h water . to the d~velo~ing commercial
area along .U.S.
31 in the northern - part of
the
township.
However, the pressures a~e too low.
The
Michigan Department . of Public Heaith will not permit
extension of · water mains in , this area unless the low
pressures · are alleviated.
The projected average water
consumption of the fully~developed study area is 55,000

GPD.
,.

. Regardless of the met.hod used to alleviate the 1 ow
pressure, · .the water main must be . e&gt;&lt;tended to the
commercial area. · The cost for constructing about 6900
feet of a. inch water main to serve the entire study
area is estimated to be $277,000. · Construction of the
water main can · be · segmented.
This will help spread the
cost. because the water main can be constructed in
sections as the need develops.
:aptio~s to alleviate the low pressure in the study
area include:
Altjrnate A
Raise existing elevated tank
Alt~rnate B
Install a pressure booster station
Alternate C
Purchase water from.Manistee
Alternate D _ Install large .diameter water mains
The recommended · improvement op-tion is Alternate Bpressure ' booster station with hydropneumatic storage.
·The estimated cost of this improvement option is
: .-$125~000. ·- The -combined _c ost to improve the water
pressure and construct the water main that is needed at
. this time (S~gment 1), would be an estimated $158,000.
Alternate . Bis recommended because it is the least
costly of the practi~al ~ptions that would be permitted
by the M~chigan Department of Public Health.

- Filer'. T~~~ship maintains about 20 to 22 storm drains in the
Oak Hil~ · and Filer · City areas ••
The drains consist of a street
surface grate and a drywell.
The function is so surface water on
roads can . drain into · the drywell for discharge into the ground.
· Few of the drywells are connected to storm drain mains.
File~ City "Road {n Filer City is the only area of the township
with drainage mains.
The Storm Drains map at the end of this
·section . ~hows the approxi~ate location of the drywell storm
drains.
At the time of writing,
these are all
of
the known
· drains of _this t~pe in t~e township.
SIDEWALKS
, , A . second cha~acteristic of the two different types of
Township is
the existence of
residenti~l · areas in Filer
sidewalks.
' In Oak Hi 11 and Filer City the township maintains
August 21, 1987.

-62-

•

�p~destrian walkways., along most residential streets.
Sidewalks
are not .· found . in
other township - residential areas, Lake
Wi nnogene, ·· Cherry · Road area, Red Apple . Road or Lakeland area.
In those areas of.· the township where si .d ewal ks exist, they
are not · al ways ;complete.·
For ex,ampl e, sidewalks do not meet
·. (Filer and · Staunton, Hilty and 'Sheridan~ Oak and Twenty Eighth
Street, · Nelson · arid Twenty Eighth Stre.et &gt; or do not exist
(Madison, west .Twenty Seventh Street, Manistee Street south of
Twenty Fifth Street) in some areas.
PUBLIC . BUILDINGS

\
.,,..
I

_Filer Township maintains three , public buildings:
first is
the ·Filer Township Hall, a one-room schoolhouse-style ~uilding
with rest rooms, offices and parking.
Second is the Filer
Townshi~ Fire Department which houses the
township's fire
figh~ing equipment,. and · meeting room.
Third is the former
township school building in Filer City,
more recently u~ed for
vocational
education .. by . lease to the Manistee Public School
District'.
· Also in Filer Township ·
is
South
(formerly Madison)
Elementary School awned and operated by the Manistee School
System • .
· The. Oak
Hill
Improvement
Association building became
t6wn~hip . property at the beginning · of the 1985 year.
The
building includes a meeting room, full
kitchen, rest rooms and
. storage room •.
PARKS, RECREATION FACILITIES AND VACANT PUBLIC LAND
.~iler Township maintains a relatively sophisticated -- and
·1arge number
· of public parks and r.ecreation services in
comparison to
other communities in Manistee County.
The
, administration of the park system is done by the Filer .Township
Board of Trustees with park planning done through the Planning
Commission -and citizen committees.
A description of park facilities follows:
A. . Filer City Pool - An outdoor pool operated and staffed
during t~e summe~ season • .
The pool is 60 by 125 feet, a league
si _z ed pool.
Facilities at the pool include a wading pool for
, children; bathh6use with locker rooms, showers; diving board; and
fencing.
The depth - ~f the pool ranges from three to eight feet.
Staff of about 15 people provide lifeguards, swimming instructors
and checkers at the shower rooms.
Use in 1980 averaged about 650
persons per week . . The general funds (Federal Revenue Sharing) is
the source o~ revenues to operate the pool,
about 520,000 net
cost to the township.
B.
A neighborhood vest-pocket park across the street from
the Filer City Pool.
Equipment at the park includes four teetertotters; twelve . swings; four children's swings; merry-qo-round;
two · s!ides; . two pi~hic .tables under a shelter.
August 21, . ·1997

-63-

�r•

~

• :'\: .~

-._.,1 •• -:

.

·-•·.

_·. c. ·. ·_oak · Hill · Improvement Association Park - The park used
to ' be a , cooperative facility between the township and the Oak
Hill Improvement. Association when ·the Association was active (the
As·sociati6n has . since dissolved).
The . township park facilities
incl.ude two tennis courts; si&gt;&lt; swings;
six children •s swings; a
·· teeter-totter; .· ·f our _ children ·s spring sets; a cross bar swing
set; · : merry~go-round.
.,
D.
· Ball· diamond ·on ·land between Twenty · Third and Twenty
Fourth Street·s . ·.
The ., diamond accommodates hard and softbal 1
g~mes~ with ' a backstop, dugouts, bleachers and fencing around the
playing area.
·
·
·, E. ·:'. Sundling Park.
This park is. a road which was removed
and the 66 ~ foot road right-oi-way turned
into a vest-pocket
. park/access -to the . Lake Michigan beach.
The park is a gr~en area
.with · minor; landscaping · to .provide for . parking near the road and a
physical ;separation · between parki'ng · and -the beach.
Facilities
include a - parking lot~ .· landscaping, two benches, stairs to the
. beach~
·
·
·- ·
: F. :.. Mago.on Creek ·· Natural Area. This facility is a 97-acre
day-use ar_ea •with · about . a quarter mi le of
Lake Michi_gan beach
frontage loc~ted in the Magoon Creek river valley.
The facility
is designed for walking,
and limited numbers of
people in the
park at any one time.
Parking is limited to parking lots, when
lats· are· -: full, .. the park is at
its maximum environmentally
~~ceptablW capacity.
The area has some environmentally sensitive
environments,
the creek,
and erosion areas currently being
~~naged ' ·under
a
u.s~ . Soil Conservation Service recovery plan.
-Facilities !include - two parking lots for 10 autos, one parking lot
(at &lt;' entrance) . ,for
six
autos;
entrance . gate,
entrance sign'
regulation . sign, three map-directional signs; miscellaneous speed
limit, -no . parking and boundary signs; ten picnic tables~ five
gril_ls, - 6ne ·male outhouse, one female outhouse; 41 birdhouse-type
signs _ and ~ posts;
~encing, . chip paths, auto barriers, entrance
road, : mounted bronze plaque. ; .
· e:: South ·Elementary School and grounds. Facilities, owned
and operated by the __ Manistee · Public . Schools, include multipurpo~e ~com, · gym/lunch r6o~/auditorium; · five basketball hoops;
two ·. mo~k_ey bars; . two · ;:_ merry-go-rounds;
five swing sets; three
slides; ·.hahd:_over-hand . bars; and a bal 1 di amend with backstop.
H. · 'i Filer Township Hall, see discussion above.
I. .
Fi 1 er City School , see discussion above.
J.
~acant public l~nd owned by - the State of Michigan
&lt;Department of :· Natural . Resources)
on the north side of Canfield
Lake.; _-;·,. &lt;five ·. acres)
__ . ·-. K •. - ·:.Vacant pubfic land owned by the Manistee Public Schools
(Scriool F~~est&gt; ( on west - Preuss Roa~;
(40 acres)
.
__ L. ". Vacant public land owned by the Mani.stee Pub 1 i c Schools
. &lt;School Forest) on Maple Road.
(40 acres)
M.
' Private Sector:
Manistee Lanes (bowling alley).
N.
Private Sector:
Hillside Motel outdoor swimming pool.
0. Private Sector:
. Veterans of Foreign Wars Welsh Post
4499 community hall.
-64-

•

�'

-.

•'·

-' P~
camp.

/' ·

·-;_ Pri~ate Sector: - . Crooked

Tree Girl Scout Council day-

Private Sector: · Fox Hills Golf Course.
Ri
Private Sector: Sunset. Motel .outdoor swimming pool.
S.
Private Sector: Day's Inn indoor swimming pool.
Previous recreation planning done by Filer Township listed
def~ciencies - in their recreation system which may be seen to
still exist.
. .There is no neighborho.od park -- children ' s
pl~y~round -- '· to serviie the . area of Canfield Lake and to service
the · •. area of · Cherry-Snow Trai 1 s-west · Red Apple-Windsor-Ramona
Roads • . The possibilit~ . o~ entering into a joint use agreement
with _the Michigan Department of Natural Resources may provide a
· sit,e:··: -in : · the · Canfield · Lake area
to resolve one . of the
deficiencies·•.: Vacant land - e&gt;&lt;ists in the Cherry Road area ~ but is
~enerally ~ct a✓ ailable for ·the township at a feasible price.
Q.

August 21,

1987

-65-

�_ J::LECTlUC . UTILITY
SERVICE, AREAS -

. Z1 :

~

D

~~

- ~

fl

a

v

i

»

~

,,b

o'i':-.

~

0

35

....-- .... \

.
I

\(_,,.-·....,:

.

-66-

3'

' ~ :n

l2

�(

\

(~)

\, _)

NATURAL GAS ·SERVICE AREA

,_..,

:,·

•I

..
,,•,
.;..

~·
~

::-. . ;;1:

Michigan Consolidated
, Gas Company
service from
existing gas lines

II

22.

I

-

23

~

24.

'
I
Q\

~,

-..J
I

I

II
\ r,

)4

I

d

•

a

::J

i

-•

'

5

4

3

~

31

~

JS

33

25

2

�stee
t

ice

60
ty

er

UNITED STATES
POST OFFICE (ZIP CODE)
SERVICE AREAS

Filer City
Post Office

49634
(post
office
boxes)
11

. '•.

D

· Mani

ee Post

Rural
ti

oute 12

If

49660

i

.a

25
t

·•
3'

D

w,:=

•-· .. ......., .

-4-

, -68-

�,........_

(

\

t)

I(

0

.

···,

......,

·.

:·~'./- .

LAKi_:

.. . ., .

"

GREEN
COUNTY
AGRICULTURAL .DRAIN
~'

CJ

.

·

;, .

·- .,:-.;

.

'\ ~·

'.

:,:,; .

:·.;

-~{-.);..\':· ·

. ·,

-'

'"_.r- b&amp; ':...1D- Known
-...
.
·_
Drain Course

:

· ~~~inagO Service.
. •:~

._,

.·•:

:

22.·

-.

._;· ..'

r' .... ,,,, ,

23

Open ·Trench Draine

to

I

°'ID,,

·canf ield . Lake ·.
~nd Kaniate~ Lake '

1w

'D

)4

~

a

i

z

33

25
,,

31

~

h

--·~
..,

----

"

'

5

4

3

2

1

'·. ·

'i .

�/'

l- . ,
-;

I

\

)

\ _)
_

.. -t:3)•
/

'
3

"•:

'Wt-.'IER
. s1s1ni
DE'IAlL
.
.
.

..

(Note: Detail ~ap's
no~th-south . a~es 1s·
tilted on the page.)
\,late~
.-M.ait\

\,late~
\,lell
31

•

Jl

:

·~

~

•

: .~... 3'

\

.

~

~ 1:'2 '

11111 Se~ic~ · Area

~

~ ·-

Area Serviced by Water System

.....
0
I

.

=
H
"'d

,.
I

~ ·
en .

~

,,

Sol"',...
3'

,,

::
~

;•

,. ,.

,..

~ ·

,1
··•

f\\.f.l\

C

en

"4
en

~:.

�....

FILER. TOWNSHIP STORM DRAINS

Cl)

ti

. C

;: -

..
..

W.22nd
St_, _

14th
St.

I

_.•---.i----~

St~-----........___

W.ZJrJ

-1

I

15th
St.
1',r

w.l

24tl\
St.

Sr

£:, w.
,.,
v,

........

17th
St.

r
E. 24th St.

~51h

~I
\

. l
~".
.!11
...,

E. 25th St.

~

18th
C St.
0

:::&gt;

...

w.

E. 26th St.

26th St.
E•

00

....C
&gt;(

j

',

. '

...

E, 28th St.

'-1,-rk ,., ·1,,1

Lake
Winn&lt;;&gt;gen e.
Subd1.vis1.o

ti •
ti ...

.

... Cl)

....

Oak Hill
Detail

.,__ _ _ Madison St.

C:

:;!

• -f .

Filer City
Detail
..
•

~torm Drain
Drywell ·

~ Storm Drain ·
..... Main
Mee St.

..:

Vl

...
C

t'O
~

t.,

Pllcr Ave.

•

.I
I

--

••

llllty

'II
I
I

•

Warren

-71-

I
I
I

..,...

...
n,

"1

CJ.

n.

�..

SIDEWALKS

en

...
ti
C

(found only in the areas of the township shown)

&gt;

road with adjacent
sidewalks
----•road

1¾:---,

sidewalk

"eE'

W. 22nd

St

14th
St.

~

~E'

W.23r
St

15th
St.

-

c: ..

1 ""

...

-5 w.

;

17th
St.

£.· 24th St.

1
...

E. 25th St •

f'\

..

en·

18th
g St.

;:I

!

E-. 26th St.

W. 26th St.

, M

...

CIO

C

W. 27th St •

)(

.s
/

U,, . 1 ,

,v

U.t

Lake
Winnogen e
Subdivisio

W.28th

St.

E. 28th St.

-~-r... -

u •
u ..
.icn

...•C

~

Hadiaon St.

:i!

. Oak Hill
Detail

Filer City
Detail

Mee St.
M
II)

M

C

•

'"

c..,

Filer Ave

Hilty

-72-

�- PUBLIC BUILDINGS

A

Filer Township
Fire Department

·' ■ File~ To~ship

Hall

• ·schools

7l

21

a

a

25

JI

i
I

I

»-

,.

I

•

'

.

-73-

:n

32

�FILER TOWNSHIP PARKS, PUBLIC
VACANT LAND, AND PRIVATE
RECREATION FACILITIES
•

Public Parks

llillIIIIII] Township-Owned Land
~Manistee Public School-Owned
~Vacant Land

~

.
State of Michigan (DNR)-Owned
Vacant Land

■ Private

'

22.■p

Recr!ation Facility

23

Letters on map correspond
to text.

..,.
I

r--.
I

ti

l)

~

■Q
)4

-_)

'

5

4

31

36

%&gt;

33

3

2

)

�TRANSPORTATION

t

'-..../

The major thrust of
transportation planning
in Filer
Township will center on road construction and maintenance.
Three
other forms of
transportation
provide service
within
the
township:
Manistee County Transportation, Inc. &lt;Dial-A-Ride and
bus services&gt;, Chessie System Railroad, and Great Lakes shipping.
Road construction is one of
the
most powerful
tools
government has to influence the development
or lack of
development -- in a given area.
Planning and routing of roads
has more social
impact than most other planning activities.
Homes, businesses, etc. will
tend to be built along existing
roads.
Land speculators tend to develop property in areas which
already have roads, or have a short distance to e~isting roads-to minimize the developer"s cost for road construction.
A clear
policy at the township
level as to what areas are
programmed for
development is important.
Equally important is
that the same policy indicates new roads will be built in those
areas
and new roads will
not be built
i~ areas where
development is not wanted.
Currently there are five types of roads in Filer Township.
First is the state/federal highway which is maintained by the
Michigan Department of Transportation.
&lt;Day to day maintenance
is contracted out to the Manistee County Road Commission in Filer
Township.}
Driveway, sign and drainage regulation is handled by
the MDOT's Cadillac Office. U.S. 31
is the only road of this
status in Filer
Township.
It is the main north-south artery
along the east side of
Lake Michigan.
The highway supports
commercial development in Filer Township south of Manistee City.
From time to time,
MDOT proceeds with studies for the
construction of a
U.S.
31
freeway
to and north
of Manistee
County., Currently the Northwest-Michigan Regional Transportation
Plan does not project a
need for
freeway systems in the 10
counties in
this part of
Mich.igan.
Pursuing
this line of
thought, MOOT, Manistee County Planning Commission and Manistee
City jointly started a
Manistee Lake Area Sub-Study Team which
proposed improvements to existing highways in the area.
Among
the recommendations in Filer Township, the major need was for the
U.S. 31 to be widened to four lanes from the south Manistee City
limits to Twenty Eighth Street.
Currently there
is a traffic
bottleneck, confusion point, where the road is four
lanes in the
city, narrows
to two lanes at Manistee Catholic Central, then is
three lanes until just south of Merkey Road and finally two lanes
before going
past
the urban
area with a lot of slow traffic
turning off of, and on to,
the highway.
This situation has
caused
a
large number of
accidents.
U.S. 31, from the city
August 21,

1987

-75-

�limits to Twenty Eighth Street, is the location
of more traffic
accidents than
any other
road
or highway in Manistee County,
outside the city, according to traffic
accident report summaries
prepared by the Michigan State Police.
The second major re~ommendation
of the Lake Area MDOT SubStudy Team
is to construct a
two-lane U.S.
31 alternate route
east of
Manistee Lake.
In
Filer Towns~ip
two possible routes
were proposed.
First,
a route to "head
east near
Preuss Road
(incorporating a
proposed Filer
City truck route&gt; around the
south part of Manistee Lake,
north
through
Stronach to M-55."
The second
alternative route
is to roughly follow the Consumers
Power high
voltage power
lines from
the county line,
at a
diagonal northeast through Stronach to M-55.
Both routes utilize
existing M-55 to cross the Big
Manistee River.
The proposed
route, it
was recommended,
is to pass as close to Manistee City
as possible, to avoid use of local roads
for access
to and from
the alternate route, and to avoid crossing the Big Manistee River
in an area where urbanization and
road crossings
do not already
exist.
The Manistee County
Planning
Commission
has
taken
the
position the proposed U.S.
31
freeway
should
it ever be
extended past
Manistee -- should follow
similar paths as those
discussed above for an alternate route.
Thinking
is that
it is
important for Filer, Manistee City and Parkdale that the existing
U.S. 31 be maintained as a
business loop.
To accomplish this,
freeway
interchanges are desired
both
north and south of the
city, and
the freeway
route should
be relatively close to the
city.
Further, the farther east
a freeway
route travels, the
larger the number of
environmentally sensitive areas which are
impacted.
Also,
when
crossing
the
Big Manistee River, the
proportion of environmental damage to the Big Manistee River is
directly proportionate to how
far east the crossing is located.
Minimum damage takes place closer to
the existing M-55 river
crossing.
Finally,
if
going
too far east, it will place the
freeway east of the Manistee Blacker Airport in Manistee Township
-- and a north interchange will be northeast of the existing U.S.
31/M-22 junction -- and too far for it to be likely to retain the
existing U.S. 31 as a business loop.
The second
type of
road
in Filer Township is the county
primary
road.
These roads
are
county
roads,
under
the
jurisdiction
of
the
Manistee County Road Commission and their
construction and maintenance are
funded
entirely by state and
federal
gasoline
taxes.
Primarv
roads are main arteries, or
through routes.
In Filer Township, Maple Road,
Merkey Road east
of Maple,
South County l_ine Road between Quarterline and U.S. 31
South, Twenty First Street, Twenty Eighth
Street, Nelson Str·eet,
Filer City Road &lt;County Route 590),
Heuer Hill
Road, an~ east
Preuss Road east of Heuer Hill Road are County primaries.
&lt;See
maps following this section).
Traditionally,
Filer
Township
has
adopted
a
policy of
recognizing
the major
through
rout~s
in
the
township
as
predominantly north-south
for
traffic
moving
to and from the
August 21,

1987

-76-

�city.
The philosophy is that existing north-south arteries
should be maintained.
From these major routes, side roads should
radiate to service neighborhood areas.
The side roads should not
be through
routes,
or provide for
easy or convenient travel
through
the neighborhood sections.
Through routes
in
the
township are considered to be Filer City Road, Heuer Hill,
Nelson, U.S. 31 South, Maple and Cherry Roads.
The third type of road in the townsh1p
is the county local
road.
The county local roads (formerly known as township roads)
are under
the
jurisdiction
of
the
Manistee County Road
Commission.
Their construction is financed by state gasoline tax
revenues and from the township general
fund.
Maintenance is
financed by state and federal gasoline tax revenues.
These are
generally considered neighborhood service
roads of
varying
degrees.
Some have a seasonal
status and do not receive yearround maintenance (no snow removal&gt;.
The road surface will vary,
paved,
gravel,
graded sand or two-track (see road surface map
following this section).
The fourth type of
road
is the recognized
private road.
Private
roads
generally
are
built,
maintained,
and
the
responsibility of a land developer or the subsequent landowners.
Private roads
can
be
constructed
in
conjunction with
a
subdivision of
land,
an easement across private property to
otherwise land-locked land, or private land roads.
The Manistee County Road Commission
discourages private
roads
in
new subdivisions,
and
requires
private roads
in
subdivisions to be constructed to county road standards.
Private
roads are shown on the road surface map.
The fifth type of road in Filer Township
(not shown on any
maps in
this report)
is the incidental two-track road.
Through
recreational vehicle use, or just cross-county auto travel, roads
are worn
and defined by two-track ruts.
Those two-tracks, which
are not certified in the county system,
have no
legal status
except for what someone might claim through adverse possession or
prolonged public use.
Such roads can be created quickly and will
grow over from disuse in a short period of time.
County roads
(local and
primary) are all certified to the
Michiga~ Department of
Transportation
under
Public
Act
51 of
1951.
The notations of
numbers on the two certification map
reproductions in this report give the length of
each county road
segment in
feet or
miles.
The certification
maps are used to
determine the number
of
miles of
county road
for
gas tax
reimbursement,
and
becomes the
Road
Commission's offici~l
statement
as
to which
roads are public
versus
private or
incidental two-track.
County roads are on right-of-ways which are dedicated to the
public (under Filer Township
Board custodianship)
as is common
within
subdivisions,
er
(2)
are on right-of-ways
which are
recognized by use.
Generally, a "user road" right-of-way is only
as wide as the worn or
maintained portion
of the road.
R □ ~d
right-of-ways are also
(3)
owned
by
local,
county or road
August 21,

1987

-77-

�commission, by recorded deed, lease, easement, in the same manner
that anyone or a corporation can own land.
Filer Township
has a
higher proportion
of
its roads
blacktopped than is normal for most townships in Manistee County.
With the possible exception of Manistee and Onekama Townships,
most have half or more of
the local roads as a gravel surface.
There are townships in Manistee County where only primary roads
are paved.
The Michigan Department of
Transportation and Manistee
County Road Commission both set up equipment for periodic traffic
counting.
A map
on following
this section illustrates the
results of
the count data for
Filer Township.
Traffic counts
strongly support the assumption that U.S. 31 South is the major
north-south route through the township.
The traffic count data
also supports Filer's policy that north-south roads tend to serve
as the major arteries through the township, and other roads serve
as neighborhood connectors with
fewer
than 500 average daily
autos.
The traffic count maps further
support
the contention
that Filer City Road,
U.S.
31 South and Maple Road are major
north-south arteries.
BUS TRANSIT
Manistee County Transportation is a federal/state subsidized
public
transportation
system which
services all
of
Filer
Township.
Service
includes handicapped and
senior citizen
transportation,
dial-a-ride
(door-to-door or demand response)
service,
bus route
in and around Manistee City and worker
commuter service from rural
parts of the county to employment
locations in the Manistee Lake area and for
community college
students going to West Shore Community College.
Manistee County Transportation also provides the promotional
services for van and car pooling in the county and works with the
Manistee
County
Road
Commission/Michigan
Department
of
Transportation to construct car pool parking lots.
HARBOR
Manistee Lake is a
natural. deep
draft shipping port.
For
Filer Township shipping is important for the importation of coal
to Packaging Corporation of America.
PCA maintains its own coal
docks for this purpose.
The potential
for shipping related industry, or use of the
harbor for
shipping,
also exists for
the former
Drop Forge
Corporation and the former Great Lakes Chemical Company location.
Associated with the county's economic development efforts there
has been discussion and study for use of the harbor to ship coal
to Manistee by unit
train and
for tug barge shipping
to major
coal users along ·the northern Lake Michigan shoreline.
Returning
tug barges may be able to haul pulpwood or other products for
Manistee industries.
While current studies show this concept is
February 19, 1988

-78-

�not yet cost effective, economies may change which
will make the
idea more attractive in the future.
As part of the harbor and
lake management, Filer Township
participated in the drafting
of
the Manistee Lake Management
Plan.
That plan
makes specific recommendations far
the
management and shoreline management of
Manistee Lake,
and is
adopted as part of
this plan by this reference.
Of particular
concern to Filer Township
is the standardization of shoreline
zoning around Manistee Lake,
to define certain industrial areas
and to provide for waterfront dependent industries having use of
the lake for shipping, cooling water and process water.
RAILROAD
The Chessie System (formerly Chesapeake and Ohio) Railroad
services the
industrial
section of
Filer Township along the
Manistee Lake shoreline.
The railroad track approaches Manistee
from the south, and goes north through Stronach,
to Eastlake and
around the north end of Manistee Lake before heading back south
and dead-ending in Filer Township in PCA's yard.
CPCA owns and
maintains track
farther into their yard and into the PCA factory
loading area.)
The railroad
does not
make a
complete loop,
connecting back with the railroad's approach to Manistee from the
south.
Railroad/highway crossings in Manistee City have long been
an
irritant
and
potential
disaster situation for the Manistee
Lake area.
U.S.
31 in
Manistee City
is the only road heading
north out of the city.
It is along this road that the Chessie
System not
only crosses the highway twice,
but
maintains a
switching yard.
Thus, trains are switching by backing across the
U.S. 31 highway.
The Michigan Department of Transportation Manistee Lake Area
Sub-Study Team found that the railroad/highway crossing is the
number one problem with transportation in the Manistee Lake area.
The study team made two recommendations to resolve the situation.
The first is to extend Washington Street
north to provide an
alternative route out of Manistee City to the north.
The second
alterna~ive is to propose extending the Chessie System railroad
through Filer
City and south to meet the main rail line entering
Manistee from the south (see map at end
of this section).
The
switching yard would be relocated to that point (just east of the
Filer-Stronach Township boundary).
This would allow the railroad
trac~ around the north side of Manistee Lake to be removed (so no
track is found north of Eastlake, and no track is found north of
the Big Manistee River Channel that
runs between Manistee Lake
and Lake Michigan).
The advantage to the railroad would be a
savings in no longer . having to maintain several bridges crossing
the Big Manistee River delta, highway crossings, and the channel
swing
bridge.
Advantage
to the community would be the
alleviation of the traffic
and potential
danger associated with
the train
crossing U.S.
31.
Currently, however, Chessie System
August 21,

1987

-79-

�management is not receptive to the idea, unless
the city and/or
municipalities involved pay for the entire relocation cost.
The potential
problem, and concern, for
Filer Township is
the route of the railroad and
grade around
the south end of
Manistee Lake.
Both PCA and Forge Corporation -- as with nearly every major
industry around Manistee Lake
either . import
or
export (or
both) material
by rail.
The Chessie System makes connections to
most
of
southern Michigan
urban
areas,
Chicago,
Detroit,
Appalachian coal fields, and eastern seaboard cities.

Au gust 2 1 ,

1987

-BO-

�CI TY OF
MfllllSTf/
\

-.

•

- ·r:·..,
··....-

~·

·
•

•

.i

rr,

.

.•

I

h~--R--H-+1\Hrlt'-~:'1" •
'-"T1""1

Ill

·'

{

,.,-,,,.__

~+mE~-\.
'!..
:r;t:
'•

~i-,.w,.t-

~
I

{ \

.

QI

.
;

,..,
t1- r:

I

,.....
I
VI

:::,

F

O

X

F a r

m

R o

d

)

C

V

~

C

11.■ II

a.
,u

::

C.

a u

Aultcrnate U.S

t h

C

0

U

',,/Iden to ~

n t

\.......,.

-81-

lac

�ca ·J

MANis( W:oUNTY ROAD COMMISSIO~
!'\Ct 51 of 1951
Certification Map for
Filer Township

\ ,i' \

~~i'l:,lr-~......;
.. H~r.:
..

I

I

n "· Ii!

- - - - - - - - County tocal/R

i

I

l

I

I

•
1

·,.·.

• '

,_ · ·--..·-· -~ ,.

•

----

-

_,'

-

•

,-

) /
. ,

I

/

ci

-

ac

'-w11JSOC1'. tt.

~u
,,

ADA't.Z ..:..-..

f1:

/

/
I

;~
~

F

Q)

&lt;Q
~

J:

,i

II

C o.

_re, .•.

Of.

~v
~

0

,1

,f

~,./ .

I
/0

•

iI

-

IC

I.'

')

:.·:uti
I•;
.,..
11
o
1•

~

I

RD .

I

~~\

OS

:+

I

'~";•~•&lt;• A&amp;E

L
I

E

I

\

. .

ci
::ir::

,' 0
E

J

H
•

FAW

I

I

: :c:

-

ii

t.

~

: 'I PREUSS

F01.

I

FARM

RD.

I

'o
•er

-!!
~

I ►

CA'fF1£LD L

.... ._ .. /~

C

\~ t)R.

0.11

f,.C,.

JNC'/AN T~~IL

I)°

,·o

&lt;::i

10

H

+

I

...

-~

~

(

~

I

x~

•

1"'

C ;-

I

(

,

j::

C

......

N

~

I . t.9-

______

00

I

...... . ........ ,.?""", '"\- ~ .

L:

Road Jnder , jurl
dic~ion 9f
l
adjacen~/ cit/
r coutiy

l

I

~]c.if
' :; ,JI

-

County Primary

11111·11~\\l!ljl!HIJ!lljljljj
1. !II

:, ·.· -• .: .

·• - -

c.~

State/F~aerall
I

~-

•

;,

iI

;.w
~

r::

'

•

.

KING

LA"E

&lt;
.l.

.... I
r:
M \µUt~ ~ µtttl 111 t1, t~ k-- -7- --.,~
i

r

I©
I

!

_ _!

--°"' --

ll__

-,.

__

_l_~lf

�,,

ROAD COMMISSION Act 51 of 1951
Certification Detail Map

IZ.

,,-7

14

. .\

JJfl' St

\ -,-/
. '

I

....
u,

'407

0

,.._u ST.
•01

i.;

&gt;

&lt;

15t, ST.
II'\

•01

.....:

~

0-

~

~

l(:,!IST.

::,
Q

I:,

-:

"'"o

.:...

~

17nrst

'C
0

~

•HO

l8~ST.

-.

""

H\

I

~

0.:,

VI

:~;.

::;

0
0
0

OAK HILL DETAIL

l&amp;I

z

&gt;

0

t3!.9ST. "'
""
'-'-8
0

~

"'
z4 t1 ST."'

►
&lt;
~

..,"'

.....,

ZS'~St

0

""o

w

J

.

#0

....

C.11

0

2.r.!s,:
(,71

AD.

LAKE
WINNOGENE
ION DETAIL

State/Federal Highwa
----County Loca
Road
f

f

•

County Pri
mary Road

111111111111 Adjacent

Municipali
Road
Alley or
Narrow

R.O.W .

WILLI!

l•9
~

""9 ..,
G.O.OYE ST.

FILER CITY

DETAIL
~~=~

HILTY

-r-:.-~-,...-..,'-""'-_.....
_,

ST

a:,
I,\
C)

4l9
WARRENS

-83-

198

�( :

r

\.

(.

l

ROAD SURFACE

-1... ,_..

See
Lake Winnogene
Detail
cer-'C.e"C

ut·

c~"'e
"t:J
CV

-~

~

Road

paved
-

-

-

- - gravel

Merkey .

~ Snow
Trails
Q)
Drive
0
I-,

- - - -

-

-

sand/two track
West

Red

0

e~

~

sor
I Lane

0
0
3:

-.. J

4J Q)
-.4 00

&lt;G

&lt;'q~

"t:J
CV

e

~

QGumb~
La.h.e

--·

la,

----Adamczak

Pt!

r--

....-0
-.4

~"'&lt;,
t"ee

CV

C

Rd.

-0

-0

W-&lt;.~gene
' Lake
Road

::i:
I

uo

~

I

Indian

,
_!r~l- l_!o~,,,'
I.

------ \

Road

..

\

lr-

C:

.~

1;;-

Cl)

I

--~~

"

, . Critter

;,;-

-fi-~r

0

........

tf
If

-~o-~n:rch

,~

IC,.

' :,0

(I)

•'

Road

•

I

E. Fox Farm Road

I
I
I

I
I

Fox

IP.

ex:

(/)

0

C

I
I

....

I

&lt;(

I

Q)

Q.
Q.

":T

....
Q)

I
\

'

~

({AK-lng
~ Lake

-0
•

Q)

................
' ex:

- I

~---•

""•1th
--·

/",..,

.........

---··-, I

I

Line

Road

I- - - -

1®S~le
'

'

�ROAD SURFACE
I

- - - - - - - paved
- - - - - • gravel
- -

-

-

-

-

sand/two track

~

\;.

~e

W.22nd
14th
St,

S t , - - - - - -...- - - - - ' \ .

I

&lt;"&lt;?.

~e

W.23rd
S t ~ - - - - - - - ~ - - - -..

15th
St.
I i:.t

I

w.l
24tl\
St,\_.__ _ _ _. . ._ _ _ ___

St_

-5::,

~

W,

.....,

17th
St,

II)

18th
C St.

:::&gt;

...
0

...

5th
~!St
_ _ _ _ _ _. ._ _
_ _St.
___
E. _
24th

I
I

E. 25th St.

g,

t

E, 26th St,

00

C

&gt;(

j

-'l, , r l , n

11,i

Lake

II •
u
...

....

Winn~g 7n 7
Subd1.v1.s1.o

... Cl)

C

;j!

Oak Hill
Detail

-----Madison St.

Filer City
Detail ·
C

..."'

"·~- ~..---.·----~•

'0
I,,

u

.c

-g ..-.........!:
0

:,

....
C

C

!:"'

• •

CII

.c

Vl

•

rove
Filer

I

I
I
I

I

I
I
I

I

Mee St.

...

...l

Ave.---~-.---,--..-~-,
•~•
__._
I
I
Hilty------1--ir--1

Vl

...
C

"'

I,,

t..?

�r

MANIS._..._,. COUNTY ROAD COMMISSION
and MI IGAN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Average Daily Traffic Count 1970-1981
I
I

l,300e

&gt;

I

I

10,000 and up

I

~----:--~

5,000 to 10,000

1I .
I

I

-- ... - I-- -I - -- -- .....I
I

1,000 to 2,500

I
I

500 to 1,000

I

l

l,350e&gt;

I

•

0 to 500

I

'

No count data
available

I

co

°'
I

400

•

2,500 to 5,000

- - - - -- - -

I

I

,300e

&lt; Actual count points, with

'

I

average daily count.
"e" means estimate.

A

150e

700e :&gt;

&lt; 140
/
/
/

I
I

I

., I

~------·--

,- -- -

------------·- ---------- - - - ---- --- ...

I

I

I
I

I
I

1_1_15

&gt;

----_:_ --, -------------~~-- - I
I

7/, D

v-

�,.0

Q.,

~
"U
IV

:.:

xtenslon

Ra 11 road I ~ch yard

and sw

I

Q

lJ

t

-87-

�LAND USE ANALYSIS
This section of the Filer Township Plan will
provide an
inventory and analysis of
the use of the land, ownership of the
land, and division of the land.
To do this the treatment of the
Land Use Analysis is divided into the following parts:
(1) a
review of the ownership of land, (2) a review of
the division or
fractionalization of
land
including subdivisions and small
parcels, (3) the various classifications of the land use, and (4)
an analysis of the elements which define the distinct character
of various communities in the township.

LAND OWNERSHIP
Land in Filer Township
is predominantly privately owned.
Most of the land in the township is owned by private individuals,
for home, vacant,
farm,
or commercial
purposes.
The second
largest landownership group
in Filer Township
is owned
by
corporations:
Packaging Corporation of America,
Manistee Forge
Corporation, or Chessie System Railroad.
Packaging Corporation
of America also has substantial holdings in the southwest quarter
of
the township and associated with their secondary treatment
ponds for the industrial discharge.
Other notable landholders in
Filer Township
include Morton-Norwich
International Inc. (brine
well
operation)
and
Great
Lakes
Land
Corp.
Ca
landholding/investment concern&gt;.
The third group
is Filer Township, with various holdings
represented as
local
government facilities
(parks, buildings,
recreation, roads,
etc.).
Most notable in terms of land area is
the Magoon Creek Natural Area on the Lake Michigan shoreline.
The fo~rth
major
landholder
in the township is the Manistee
Public Schools, both for
school · facilities
and
forested land.
The former
city landfill
site is still owned by Manistee City;
Manistee County has interest in some lands (via general bonding
for
financing
pollution abatement
equipment
for
Packaging
Corporation of America&gt;.
In terms of acreage,
federal or state
ownership of land in Filer Township is insignificant or nil.
A map
on at
the end
of
this section
illustrates the
landownership pattern within Filer
Township,
naming the larger
parcel owners.
This map also begins to illustrate the pattern of
land fractionalization in the township.
LAND FRACTIONALIZATION

August 21,

1987

-88-

�it is
in which
Fractionalization of land
is the manner
large acreages vs. small lots;
divided
into parcels;
such
as
straight edges vs. irregular
square vs.
long narrow strips;
boundaries; and so on.
The most dense (small
lots) division of land is generally
represented by the existence of subdivisions.
When
a landowner
chooses to divide his land into more than four parcels, each 10
acres or smaller in size, within a 10-year' period, a
formal plat
must be drawn and approved as a subdivision.
Other splitting of
land is done as dividing property into smaller parcels.
A proposed plat
(the drawing of
lots)
is subject to a
lengthy review by township, county and state agencies before the
land can actually be subdivided.
The review and approvals are
designed
to
provide government
the opportunity to insure
compliance with zoning, that there is adequate drainage, septic
facilities,
road access,
open space,
and so on.
The map of
Subdivisions following
this section shades in the areas within
Filer Township which have recorded -- approved -- subdivisions.
As a
generalization, subdivisions tend to cover the largest
land areas in the more urban
areas of
the township:
Oak Hill,
Filer
City,
Cherry-Red
Apple
Roads.
There is another
concentration of subdivisions along
the Lake Michigan shoreline
reflecting what was originally resort residential development.
Extensive land fractionalization has also taken place ir. the
township.
The map entitled "Land Fractionalization" shoi,Js the
area within
Filer where parcel sizes are ten acres or smaller,
but not within subdivisions.
The areas where land is divided in
this manner are commonly found adjacent to subdivisions and along
main roads:
Oak Hill area;
Merkey-Maple Roads area; along Fox
Farm, U.S.
31 South,
South County Line, Preuss and Indian Trail
Hoads.
By comparison of the land fractionalization
map
with the
plat map
on the previous pagei one can observe that much of the
fractionalized divided land is into parcels which are about 10
acres in size.
Each parcel
often has one home near a public
road.
The remainder of the parcel lies vacant. This arrangement
cre~tes a
situation where land which is not near a road is split
up into ,d ifferent ownerships.
T.his results
in
land remaining
vacant ar.d generally not available for residential development.
Small
parcels are often not as economically feasib!e for
developers to work with, particularly with
the development
of a
subdivision requiring
road, drainage, or other development.
The
result is a lack of "infilling"
in areas of the township wherEresidential development is occurring.
Homes
tend
to
be built
along
roads,
resulting
in
a
residential land use pattern in
strips along
both
sides of a
road,
while property behind
the homes remains vacant.
The
residential
development
then
continues to move
along
ro~d
corridors rather
than the development filling in behind existing
homes:
"infilling".
.
Fil er- Township
has more than adequate
l .;..nd to ac-ctwHnc,,_, a.te
the anticipated
growth in
the township, and can accommodate the
August 21,

1987

-89-

�development
with
little
infrastructure
development
(see
discussion earlier in report&gt;.
With the anticipated population
growth in the township, as little as 20 acres of
additional land
could be adequate to meet
the growth demand with little road
construction.
However, due to the
larger lot
pattern (lack of
subdividing) and
homes on large parcels leaving land behind them
vacant as much as 340 acres are needed
(just over
a half
of a
square mile)
with the accompanying infrastructure costs for that
development.
For example, it takes a lot more road
-- and costs
a lot
more -- to service 34 homes
in a 340 acre area than the
same 34 homes on about 20 acres.
The same escalated costs exist
for other services:
school bus, garbage route, utilities, and so
on.
To address the problem head on would be for the
township to
enter into a detailed planning process; literally plotting future
road development areas to provide access
in areas which are
failing to infill.
A regulatory approach might be to also impose
a maximum parcel
size in a
zoning ordinance i~ residential
districts to discourage divided
vacant
land
that results in
vacant land not infilled.
The township can also, in talking with
landowners, discourage the development of just dividing land into
large parcels, while promoting development via subdividing.
The
township may consider speculative construction of
a road under
the theory that home development
will
follow along
the road.
Concern with
this approach
is that taxes collected on developed
land to pay for the speculative development
is not seen
as a
realistic way to recover the investment.
The township can also,
by policy, refuse to develop roads
or allow road development in
areas not zoned primarily for residential use.
Also the township
can agree to road
development,
(agreeing
or
not
agreeing) to
share cost or roads with developers, in areas zoned primarily for
industrial, commercial or residential uses . . This policy of road
development can be used
as a
means to encourage development in
certain areas of the township.
This approach is also not viewed
as workable as there is a political fear of sharing costs in one
instance and not another.
Thus, using road development as a tool
is limited
to the options of detailed planning of road location,
persuasipn with landowners to ~iscourage
land development / road
development
in
rural
areas versus encourage developme"t
in
residential
and
in
more dense residential,
commercjal
and
industrial areas, creating a maximum p~rcel size allowable.
Filer Township Planning Commission has previously st~ted the
objective of keeping residential development at the north end of
the township,
adjacent to similar development in Manistee City.
Allowing development to occur on
large parcels will,
in part,
work
counter
to that
goal
as housing will sprawl out over a
larger land area.
Attemptihg
to have residential development
fill in
areas within
the already developed residential area of
the township can work to further the goal.
A comparison of the map of subdivisions and the map of 12nd
fractionalization
also
illustrates
the tendency for
land
di v isions to be found distributed throughout
the township, while
August 21,

1987

-90-

�subdivisions tend to congregate at the north end of the township.
The problem is not that division of land takes place in the south
part of
the township,
but rather that division of land takes
place in the north end of the township rather than subdividing or
some other form of more dense residential development.
LAND USE
The map following this section illustrates the location and
extent of the various types of
land uses in the township.
To
draw the map,
airphotos are used to identify, for example, . a
residential
area.
Then a
boundary
is drawn
around the
residential area,
thus illustrating the shape and extent of land
the residential
area occupies.
This
is
then
given a
classification number -- 113 -- which is similar in function to
the Dewey Decimal
Classification system used for
books
in
libraries.
The classification system is a statewide standardized
system.
An explanation of
the classification numbers used on
Filer Township's map is on the page following the map.
(Far visual
impact~ and to make the map easier to read, one
may color the map.
A suggested color scheme is residential,
yellow;
commercial
and services,
orange;
industrial,
red;
transportation and utilities,
black;
open and other &lt;parks,
cemeteries), purple; agricultural, light green; rangeland, white;
for~sted,
green;
water,
blue;
wetlands,
aqua-blue;
barren
(beach), flesh.)
A discussion on the various land uses in the township
follows:
Barren:
Land in Filer Township which is
considered barren land is classified
as beach and lakeside bluffs.
This
land use/cover
is only found
in
Filer
Township
along
the Lake
Michigan coastline.

Wetland:
(611, 612, 622)
Wetlands in Filer Township
are found
in
four
general
circumstances.
Wetlands are associated with inland lakes in the

\'.

/

August 21,

1987

-91-

�central part of the township and in
the
southeast
corner
of
the
township.
Second,
wetlands are
found
as glacial
potholes in the
south-central and southeast portions
of
the township.
Third, wetlands
are associated with drainage into
Lake Michigan
(along Magoon Creek,
etc.).
These wetlands are currently
under
the
protection
of
the
Goemaere-Anderson Wetland Protection
Act &lt;P.A.
203 of
1979; MCL 281.701
et.
sq.).
Unti 1
the Michigan
Department
of
Natural
Resources
inventories the other wetlands, they
are not subject
to . the Wetland Protection Act.
The fourth wetland category found
in Filer Township is at the south end of Manistee Lake.
Wetlands are highly complex
natural
systems
in the
ecological
balance
of
nature.
Wetlands provide the most
productive a~eas for
breeding,
nesting and rearing of birds,
mammals, fish
and reptiles.
From that cycle of nature comes the
wildlife for enjoyment, hunting,
fishing and trapping, which in
turn provides an important contribution to the tourist industry .
in Michigan.
A traditional use of wetlands -- bogs -- is for the
production of
cash crops such as cranberries, blueberries and
timber.
(Though not currently found in Filer.)
Wetlands play an
important role
in sediment control
and wastewater treatment.
Particularly with the wetlands at the south end of Manistee Lake,
the wetlands
act as
a major sediment filter which reduces silt
and sand from the Little Manistee River entering Manistee Lake.
Also,
the Manistee Lake wetlands play. an
important role in
maintaining -- improving -- the water quality of
Manistee Lake.
The wetlands provide an "oxygen factory" which replaces oxygen in
the lake used in the process of man-made material decaying on the
lake bottom.
The wetland also provides a natural system which
uses -- thus removes -- nutrients from the lake water.
This function
of
wetlands . is particularly critical when
adjacent
to
the highly
industrialized and slab-wood
loaded
Manistee Lake bottom.
Protection of the wetlands is an important
aspect of
the Manistee Lake Management Plan of 1982, adooted ~s
part of this plan by this reference.
All wetlands,
regardless of
location
in Filer Township 1
provide the
above positive attributes.
Also, wetlands provide~
storage, or
buffer, for
floodwater and other water runoff.
A
wetland
area
is able to absorb large quantities of water, in
effect storing the water, and letting it drain slowly rather than
having water draining all at once, resulting in floods or erosion
from runoff.
( 52,

August 21,

54 &gt;

1987

-92-

�Water bodies in Filer Township include inland lakes, streams
and Lake Michigan, all discussed in the natural features section
of this plan.
Forested:
(400 - 499)
As shown with the small land
use/cover map,
right, forest cover
ldnd is the dominant
land use in
Filer Township.
Forest areas, along
with
the
rangeland
category,
illustrate the undeveloped area of
the township.
The
two maps,
together, show areas of the township
which have not
seen residential,
commercial,
industrial,
etc.
development.
It illustrates a lack
of development
in the south part of
the township,
but
it also shows
landlocked areas of the north end of
the township
which
have not developed -- infilled.
Further
discussion on forestry issues are found · in the natural features
section of this plan.
Rangeland:
(31, 32)
Rangeland on the map refers to
open fields
of grass
(31)
and to
grassy fields with shrubs (32).

Agricultural:
&lt;21,22,24)
Land
actually
used
for
agricultural
purposes
in
Filer
Township tends to be in the south
;::i~::. . _:. ... -~~-~
·.-..~ . .• . . • . ~~., ~;__;'. 2~
and
southeast
portions of
Filer.
Relatively
little
land
in the
township is used
in
a
manner that
; ., . ...
11· ... .""
'
I'
'
~·"";. •
. ~
allows
it
to be classified as
agricultural.
A comparison
of the
agricultural map
with the soils map
._ 'ls· '
and the wetlands land use/cover map
_.".. ·'_Q
illustrate a relatively high
correlation
between
better soils,
wetlands,
and agricultural
activity.
Further discussion
an
agricultural
activity can be
found in the natural features section of this plan.

i"? .L _:i-c:=-'~
/,di~:_ ;. ~\-·\l '

'../:·
._;_
/2·\.· r· ~-,·r_:·,, .. - '. · :
I

.,

August 21,

1987

-93-

�...

\

Open and Other-:
(193, 194)
The land use category "open and
other"
in Filer
Township includes
two categories;
outdoor recreation
(193) such as
parks,
golf courses,
track;
and cemeteries (194).
With
the scale map used
in this report,
only the Fox
Hills Golf
Course,
Reitz Park (actually in the city),
the Manistee Catholic Central playing field, Trinity Lutheran and
Mount Carmel Cemeteries are shown.
Transportation and Utilities:
(1431,146)
Land used
for
transportation
includes
roads,
parking
lots,
port/dock
facilities, railroads and
J::
~,
so on.
Land
used
for utilities
..
includes, for
Filer Township, water
treatment
plants.
Of
particular
note
is
the secondary treatment
ponds
operated
by
Packaging
Corporation
of
America just to the
southwest of Filer City.

/J

•

It
• \

I

Indu=trial:
(13,1319,1321,1336)
The predominance of industrial
activity in
Filer Township is found
along the Manistee Lake shoreline.
On Manistee Lake industry has access
to shipping, rail, and
class A road
modes of transportation.
The map on
the
right
side
of
this page
illustrates the geographic location
of industrial land uses.
Furt~er discussion on
in the economic section of this plan.
CommPrrial and Services:
(12,12~,126)
With few exceptions, commercial
activity in
Filer Township is along
the U.S. 31 South corridor.
The few
e x ceptions which
do exist are spots
within
the
more densely developed
residential areas
of the township-Oa~
Hill
and
Filer
City
areas.
Further ~iscussion on commercial and
services can
be
found
in
the
economic section of this plan .

1987

-94-

is found

�Residential:
(112,113)
The map, right, illustrat~s the
distribution of
residential
land
uses in Filer Township.
Homes tend
to concentrate in
the two older
neighborhoods
(Oak
Hill
and Filer
City)
where
public
water
is
available;
along the Lake Michigan
shoreline;
and
in
lineal patterns
along paved county roads.
There is
also
a
notable concentration of
homes along South County Line Road
just east of Maple Road.
For the purposes of drawing the residential land
use in map
form, only those residential areas which are larger than 2 1/2 to
5 acres in size and with a density of three homes per 2 1/2
to 5
acres are shown.
Thus a
single home
(farm homestead, for
example) will ·not be classified within the residential land use.
The distribution of
the
residential
land
use also
illustrates the areas of the township which are subdivided versus
those areas which are divided into parcels and
result in homes
along
existing county roads.
Despite the previous township
planning goal to retain dense residential
development
to the
north part · of the township, the
land use map shows residential
development along roads has taken place south of
the residential
zone district.
This is particularly evident along Maple Road,
U.S. 31 South and South County Line Road.
COMMUNITY CHARACTER
This part of
the Land Use Analysis
is an
attempt to
characterize
the
various
neighborhoods,
or
groups
of
neighborhoods, as distinct entities.
The purpose is to define
various areas of the township which share common attributes.
The
attributes reviewed are physical,
environmental,
aesthetic and
socio-psychological.
The members of
the Filer
Township Planning Commission
independently reviewed various areas of the township.
By using
their personal knowledge they were able to go down a checklist to
use a quick phrase to characterize a particular
community in the
township.
Staff
at the Manistee County Planning Departm~nt
reviewed each township planning
commission member's
response in
order to compile the responses into one set of characterizations
for each neighborhood.
The Filer Township Planning Commission
then
reviewed the
compiled responses,
editing and
modifying them according to the
consensus of the •~roup.
The Township Pl 2nni ng
Cammi ssi on -:11 so
defined the
geographic boundaries nf each area, as shown on the
map on the next page.
Community characteristics which are common to each of t~e
neighborhoods in the township are as follows:
August 2 l

1

1987

-95-

�All neighborhoods have the following characteristics:
A high
proportion of homes/businesses occupied by
their owners, relatively few renters or lessors.
Single family homes dominate.
Relatively few fences around yards or lots.
A small number ("some")
hedges along
lot or yard
borders.
Traffic pattern -- circul.at'ion
by automobile is
common.
Color and texture of buildings
such as siding,
roofing,
etc.
does not
follow any uniform
pattern.
There are no areas of the township where
there
is a
theme to the exterior design of
buildings.
There is an overall
socio-psychological
home
ownership pride that
results in home and yard
care.
Mobility/access,
consumption/shopping,
security/safety, and employment opportunities are
the same throughout the township.
Characteristics which are representative of Filer City are:
The area is a
residential, commercial
mix.
The
proximity
of
industrial
activity
to
the
neighborhood
creates
the
image
that
the
residential area also has an industrial mix.
Home prices are considered to be in the low to
medium range. _
A relatively high density
of homes -- small lots
characteristic of an old subdivision.
With small
lots,
there is a question about how
much privacy exists from yard to yard, house to
house.
The neighborhood
is the oldest settled portion of
the township.
Buildings are generally two floor (with the second
most frequent being one floor).
Hames and accessory buildings occupy most of the
land area on the ~espective parcel of land.
Little open space, with few empty lots.
A large
volume of
traffic
notably trucks-traverse through the area.
The landscape is characterized by square city
block pattern with alleyways.
The area is flc:lt.
The linkage between buildings and uses, if a:-iy, is
the close proximity to each other.
The
area
has
sidewalks,
accommodating
the
pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
Air and water quality is "poor" to "good to fair"
dependent on w~ather and wind direction vis-a-vis
adjacent industrial activity and other industries
along the Manistee Lake shoreline.
Au.gust 21,

1987

-96-

�There
are
no,
or
poor,
aesthetic visual
attractions in the neighborhood.
Odors, smoke and noise are frequent
problems in
terms of
volume,
pitch and frequency associated
with the adjacent
industrial
activity and heavy
traffic.
There are few signs,
with little or no perceived
problem from signage.
There are no scenic roads.
Recreational experiences in the neighborhood are
''fair" particularly with the Filer City pool and
neighborhood park.
There is little contemporary neighborhood cohesion
&lt;local
nationalism)
as current residents tend
toward individualism.
However, many people in the
township and county identify with Filer City,
indicating they are from there.
Characteristics which are representative of Oak Hill are:
The area is residential,
with an old/former
commercial mixed in.
Home prices are considered to be in the medium
range.
A relatively high density of homes
small lots
characteristic of an old subdivision.
With small
lots,
there is a question about how
much privacy exists from house to house, but with
placement of
auto garages there is the feeling
privacy does exist from yard to yard.
The
neighborhood
has
some
historic value,
particularly with
the Filer mansion
and
its
associated buildings.
Buildings are generally one floor
ranch style.
Many appear to be constructed in the 1950's.
Homes and accessory buildings occupy most of the
land area on the respective parcel of land.
Little open space, with few empty lots, exists in
the center portion of
the subdivision, but there
are vacant lots and fields at the west edge of Oak
Hill.
.
A
large volume of
traffic
notably trucks-traverse through the area an
two county primary
roads.
County local
roads tend to experience
lower volumes of heavy tr~ffic.
The
landscape is characterized by square city
block pattern.
The area is flat.
The linkages between buildings and uses is the
close proximity to each other, reinforced by the
city block street patterns.
The
area
has
sidewalks,
the
accommodating
pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
Air and water quality is ttgoad
to fair'' dependent
on weather and wind direction vis-a-vis industries
August 21,

1987

-97-

�along the Manis.tee Lake shoreline.
Better air
quality may
be perceived to exist here
(in
comparison to Filer City)
because there
is no
immediately adjacent industry.
There is an aesthetic view across Manistee Lake.
Odors, smoke and noise are problems in terms of
volume,
pitch and frequency
but
not
as
frequently as in Filer City -- associated with the
lakeside industrial activity and heavy traffic.
There are few signs,
with little or no perceived
problem from signage.
There are no scenic roads.
Recreational
experiences in the neighborhood are
"okay" with use of
Manistee City's Reitz ' s Park,
Oak Hill Improvement Association neighborhood park
and Maywood ballfield.
There is little contemporary neighborhood cohesion
(local
nationalism&gt;
as current residents tend
toward
individualism.
The area used
to be
cohesive, reflected by the former existence of the
Oak Hill Improvement Association.
Characteristics which are representative of
the U.S. 31
South area:
The area is mainly a commercial development mix.
Land prices are high as a result of commercial
development.
Only two homes exist between Twenty-Eighth Street
and the City limits.
absentee
corporation of
local
Ownership
is
business.
The neighborhood is a commercial strip development
along a federal highway.
Buildings are generally one floor.
A lot of open space, particularly on land behind
the developed
commercial
strip along U.S.
31
South.
A large volume of traffic traverses through the
area on the major . north-south federal highway .
The
landscape
is
characterized
by
lineal
development along the highway.
The area is hilly,
sometimes requiring fill to create flat building
sites at highway grade.
The linkages between buildings and uses, if any,
are poor,
requiring
too many drives onto the
highway, and independent parking lots.
The area does not have sidewalks, so there is no
accommodation for pedestrian and bicycle traffic.
Air and water qua.lity is "good".
There are no, or poor aesthetic visual attractions
in the neighborhood, but there is one view from
the Cypress Plaza toward Manistee City.
August 21,

1987

-98-

�Noise is a frequent
problem in
terms of volume,
pitch and frequency associated with the adjacent
highway.
possible perceived
There are many signs,
with a
depreciation of
the quality of the area.
Signage
is especially bad at
night with
glare and
lighting.
There are no scenic roads.
Recreational
experiences in
the neighborhood do
not exist.
There is no contemporary neighborhood cohesion
(local nationalism&gt;.
Characteristics which are representative of Lake Michigan
shoreline area are:
The area is residential.
Originally started as a
summer resort
area,
but
has evolved into yearround
residence
for
retirees
and
working
residents.
Home prices are considered to be in the high
range.
A relatively
medium density of
homes -- l c1.rge
subdivision lots on or near Lake Michigan.
Privacy exists from yard to yard and house to
house with
large lots,
open space
and tree
buffering.
Buildings are generally two floor (with the second
most frequent
being one floor).
Most homes are
custom built to homeowner's or architect's plans,
resulting in a variety and some unique designs.
Homes and accessory buildings occupy a
small
portion of
the land area on the respective parcel
of land.
A lot of open space, with regular empty
lots, or
homeowners owning more than one lot.
A small
volume of
traffic as the roads are not
through routes.
There is
a
perception of a
problem with speeding cars.
The landscape is ~haracterized by rural open 5pace
attributes
(fields,
woods)
and
Lake Michigan
shoreline.
The area is gently rolling.
The linkages between buildings and uses underline
a low-key character.
Homes are designed to blend
with the landscape.
The area does not have sidewalks, so pedestrian
and bicycle traffic use the roadway.
Air and water quality is "good".
There is the aesthetic views of
Lake Michigan,
fall color, wildlife in the neighborhood.
Odors, smoke and noise are infrequent problems in
terms of volume,
pitch
and frequency.
If the
problem exists,
it is associated with motorbikes
and snowmobiles.
August 21,

1987

-99-

�\~&gt;

There are few signs,
with little or no perceived
problem from signage.
Red Apple Road between Fox Farm and Magoon Creek
Natural Area Entrance considered scenic.
Recreational experiences in the neighborhood are
"good"
particularly with Lake Michigan beach,
Sundling Park, Magoon Cree~ Natural Area and the
Lakeland
Association
and
Red
Apple
Beach
Association's lake access.
There is neighborhood cohesion (local nationalism)
reflected by the existence of th~ Red Apple Beach
Association and
Lakeland Association property
owner's groups.
The neighborhood
is relatively new,
with most
residents choosing to live there.
Characteristics which are representative of Cherry-Red Apple
Road area are:
The area is residential.
Home prices are considered to be in the medium to
high range.
A medium density of homes.
Privacy exists from yard to yard, house to house.
The neighborhood is a relatively new portion of
the township.
Buildings are generally one floor ranch style,
usually standard designed units.
A lot of open ?pace, with vacant land to the rear
of many homes.
A moderate volume of traffic traverses through or
to the area.
The landscape is characterized by square rural
section
line,
1/8 line, 1J16 line road pattern.
The area is flat.
The linkages between buildings and
uses is the
proximity along existing ~oads.
Pedestrian and
bicycle traffic
use the county
roads.
Air and water qual.i t y is "gcod".
Aesthetic vis~al attractions
include open sp~ce,
fall color, wildlife.
Noise is a problem in terms of volume associated
with traffic, motorbikes and snowmobiles.
There are few signs,
with little or no perceived
problem from signage.
There are no scenic roads.
Recreational
experiences
in the neighborhood are
"poor" to "fair".
Open space provides some, but a
neighborhood park does not exjst in this area.
There
is
little neighborhood cohesion
(local
nati anal ism).
Characteristics which are representative of
Centr2.l Maple
Road corridor area are:
August

21,

1987

-100-

�The area is residential.
Home prices are considered to be in the medium
range.
A medium to low density of homes on small parcels
and on acreages.
Privacy
exists
from
yard to yard,
due to
relatively larger sizes of , homes or adjacent to a
large amount of open space or inland la k e.
Buildings are generally one or two floor.
Homes and accessory buildings occupy a
small
proportion of
the
land area on the respective
parcel of 1 and.
A lot
of open space, with vacant land to the rear
of homes.
A large volume of
traffic traverses through the
two main north-south arteries and Merkey Road.
The landscape is characterized by an irregular
road
pattern,
with two significant north-south
arteries.
The area is gently rolling to flat.
The linkages between buildings and uses, if any,
is the proximity to a common feature, such as an
inland lake or are lineal along a road.
The area does not have s~dewalks to accommodate
pedestrian or bicycle traffic.
Air and water quality is "good".
There
are
no,
or
poor,
aesthetic visual
attractions in the neighborhood.
Odors,
smoke and noise are frequent problems in
terms of volume,
pitch and frequency associated
with the adjacent
industrial activity and heavy
traffic.
There are few signs,
with little or no perceived
problem from signage.
There are no scenic roads.
Recreational
experiences
in the neighborhood are
"fair" with availability of open space and inland
lakes
(Canfield)
but
no formal recreation sites
exist.
There is little neighborhood
(local
cohesion
nationalism&gt;.
Characteristics which are representative of the Agricultural
ar-ea are:
with some
The area
is dominantly residential,
agr-icultural mix.
Home prices are consider-ed to be in the medium
range.
homes an small
to large
A- very low density
of
acreages.
A lot
of privacy exists with the large acr-eages
available.
Buildings ar-e generally two floor wood frame.
August 21,

1987

-101-

�small
Homes and accessory buildings occupy a
amount of
the land area on the respective parcel
of land.
A lot of open space,
with wood
lots, wetlands,
rangeland and cultivated fields.
A moderate volume of traffic traverses through the
area,
with heavy traffi~
on two north-south
arteries.
The
landscape
is
characterized
by
square
sectionline block patterns.
The area
is flat to
gently rolling.
Air and water quality is "good".
Aesthetic views include the Udell Hills from Linke
Road and of the pasture lands.
There are few signs,
with little or no perceived
problem from signage.
There are no scenic roads.
There is little contemporary neighborhood cohesion
(local nationalism).
Characteristics which are representative of the Forest area
are:
The area is dominantly forest cover with little or
no residential development.
Open space -- woods -- dominate, with little or no
development.
Roads are non-existent,
private,
or unimproved
primitive trails.
There are no signs.
Air and water quality is "good".
Characteristics which are representative of
the Industry
area are:
The area is dominantly industrial.
Little open space exists by the lake, with fields
surrounding the facilities southwest of
Filer
City.
No residences exist in the area.

\,.__./

Th~ nine distinct neighb0rhoods described above each have
unique characteristics.
Those characteristics nelp define the
different
areas of
the township
for
purposes of introducing
public programs
to enhance the positive characteristics and to
mitigate what
may be seen as undesirable characteristics.
For
example, concerning the residential
districts,
there are five
neighborhoods
in
the township.
For
purposes of
zoning
regulation, however, the five neighborhoods can be combined into
two zoning
districts:
a
high density residential area that
includes Oak Hill and
Filer City.
This
is because both these
areas have many characteristics
in common:
older subdivisions;
smaller
lots;
not
a
lot of
open space;
road
and sidewalk
circulation of
traffic; commercial/industrial
mix; large volume
of traffic including trucks; noise, smoke,
odors, air
and water
quality
is
poorer
than other
residential
areas due to the
August 21,

1987

-102-

�proximity of
industrial activity.
The assessment of community
character supports the decision to treat both the neighborhoods
as one zoning district in addition to existing infrastructure
(water system&gt;,
and other factors outlined in other parts of the
plan.
Likewise,
the remaining three residential
neighborhoods
&lt;Lake Michigan shore, Cherry-Red Apple Roads, Central Maple Road
corridor&gt; also share common characteristics that support its
treatment as a medium density zoning district.
The community characteristics, along with land use mapping,
natural
features
information,
etc.
can be used to identify
and
commercial,
industrial,
residential
and agricultural,
forestry zones in Filer Township.

August 21,

1987

-103-

�FILER TOWNSHIP PARCEL OWNERSHIP
Source:

Rockford Map Publishers Inc., Plat Book for
MaJ?.istee County

~

~
'V

.,

!'i-ir,,_L.:.ll.:~:i-t-7"-1b-'17':':"l-_.__~~~~~~~+.'l--".!~...._...........,i,c,-~:"!'T:"t.~§

,.,

~,

2

.

·.

,,..h,.•

.;;_.11--:--'-ri~'O-t.:PT;;-",::J.;:,=::.::r.'."1'1:r.c:;;.;r.----

*''

..•.,• -.

;..-;;,

#

.......

'"'~,.,.,....

~

, .~~. l~~- ~

• • ,,,._;, ('..!..!"

,.•

i!,, I••~"':/ .
• ',•11,1-1

2000W

"'
0
r--i:::=~~~t't"T~~"TT""ri"-:-"""."lt~~- 8

.

••/

IOOOW

00

�(ti)

1)

C'J)

FILER TOWNSHIP
W':'dsall
Village

llECORDED SUBDIVISIONS

H. W. Harsh Addition to Oak Hill
chard Linke Subdivision
Addition

#2

22

23

....
0

V,

I

1J

)4

'

i

15

33

5

i

2'

4

3

25

.1)

~

31

Rockie
Valley
Plat

2

of

Oak Hill

�(..,..,~

(

LAND FRACTIONALIZATION
Shaded areas are part of Filer Township
which are:
•Not subdivided, but
·Approximately 10 acre parcels
or smaller

.....I
0

°'
I

~

)4

5

4

31

~

~

3

2

�FILER TOWNSHIP LAND USE/COVER MAP
summer 1981
(see key on adjoining page)

.-

N

a,

-:

M

-.

m_
M

~

..:I--

I.../)

r
-107-

-.....

�Filer Township Land Use/Cover Map Key
URBAN
112 residential multi family low-rise
113 residential single family and duplexes
12
commercial and services
122 commercial and services, shopping center and malls
126 commercial and services, institutional
13
industrial
131
industrial, primary metal production
1319 industrial, primary metal production, forging
1321 industrial, inorganic and organic chemicals
1336 industrial, primary wood processing, paperboard mill
1431 transportation, water, port/dock facilities
146 utilities
193 open and other, outdoor recreation
194 open and other, cemeteries
AGRICULTURAL
21
cropland
22
orchard
24
pasture

RANGELAND
31
32

herbaceous · grass field
shrub, field with woody plants

FORESTED
411
412

413
421
423

deciduous, northern hardwood
deciduous, central hardwood
deciduous, aspen/white birch association
coniferous, pine
coniferous, lowland conifer

WATER
1 ake
great lake

52

54

WETLAND
611
forested, wooded (20+ feet tall trees)
612 forested, shrub/scrub
622 _
non-forested,
emerg~nt
(most plants
waterlevel)

growing above

BARREN
721

beach, sand

This classification system is the same system used state-wide in
Michigan by the Michigan Natural Resources Inventory System, Land
Use/Cover Classification System.

AL1gust

21 ,

1987

-108-

�l

FILER TOWNSHIP
COMMUNITY CHARACTER

l

\. ·_.

,

MAP OF NEIGHBORHOODS

U.S.-31 CoJUudo~
Oa.k. H-Ul.

CheNLyRe.d

'

App~

Roa.d

La.k.e.
M-&lt;.c.fuga.n

Sho~e.-

Ag tuc.uliuJr.al
)4

line.ll

~

Fo~Ui.t

Manistee County Planning Commission Sept. 1985

5

L

4

3

-109-

2

------ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -~

�GOALS, OBJECTIVES, ACTIO~ PLAN
The main function of this document is to plan for the future
of Filer Township.
Planning for
the future includes the total
scope of township services and capital
improvements done in the
township.
Thus,
planning
includes road construction; water
system construction;
maintenance and construction of
public
buildings;
sidewalk
construction;
park
improvement
and
construction;
economic development,
including
tax
incentive
programs, bonding, etc.; and development of the land so there are
coordinated areas of residential expansion, preservation of open
space,
environmental
protection
and
areas
for
intense
development, such as commercial and industrial.
The planning for the future for
Filer Township should take
into account
the anticipated population growth, economic growth,
natural resources and geography of the township.
This section of
the Filer Township Comprehensive Plan is to present statements
and principals for
the planned development
of
Filer.
This
section of
the plan is also likely to be the more frequently
amended and updated portion of
the plan.
The Filer Township
Planning Commission should, every three to five years, carefully
review this document to make sure it is still up-to-date.
Every
time a zoning
ordinance amendment
is proposed, the Planning
Commission should first
review the proposed
zoning amendment
against the plan to insure that it complies, or that this plan be
updated first.
Finally,
the Filer Township Planning Commission
should
coordinate
this
plan
with
the
Manistee County
Comprehensive Plans to insure neither contradict one another.
The statements for planning in Filer Township are given in
three forms,
or
three levels.
First
is the statement of a
"goal". , A goal means a general description of an ideal condition
or situation. · The purpose of a goal is to provide direction.
It
may, admittedly, not be obtainable.
The second
is the statement
of an
"objective".
An objective i .s an a.chievc1.ble point in the
general direction of a
goal.
Its achievement marks progress
toward the goal.
The third
is the statement of "strategy".
A
strategy means the township ' s
policy,
planned
action,
or
directive,
which
is designed ta achieve an objective.
A
simplified . example of this, at a . personal level, might be to have
the goal
of always owning a new car without debt.
The objective
is to buy a
car every three years.
The strategy is to place
S333.33 in
a savings account every month and not use the savings
ac c ount e x cept to buy the new car.
In an attempt to
identify goals and objectives for this
plan, the following two methods were used.
The Filer Township
August 21,

1987

-110-

�t )

Planning Commission established some general service statements
which were used to
develop the map on the next page:
"Existing
Service Areas of the
Township".
The statements
are to reflect
areas where public water and sidewalks are to be provided, where
paved roads are, areas for
10 minute fire
department response
time, areas where neighborhood parks are within a half mile from
residential areas, and where parks are _ within one mile from
residential
areas.
The next
map
shows those areas of Filer
Township where the above services should be available.
That map,
''Planned Service Areas",
is created
by
the Filer
Township
Planning Commission to define what
levels of
service will be
provided
(objective)
to certain
areas of
the township.
The
following map, ''Deficiencies in Planned Service Areas", is a map
that
shows
which
areas
~f
Filer Township
have service
deficiencies according to the above standards.
The overall goal of _ the Filer Township Comprehensive Plan is
to have preservation of
the attributes which comprise the high
quality of
life in
Filer Township,
while at
the same time
accommodating population, commercial and industrial growth.
An objective
is that commercial, industrial and residential
areas of Filer Township
be consolidated
in
area so that the
township
can
benefit
from
lower costs by only providing urban
level services to those selected areas of the township, rather
than
bearing
the high
cost
of . providing
the urban services
throughout the township.
The Planned Service Areas
~ap is Filer
Township Planning Commission's attempt to show which areas of the
township will receive what levels of service.
The remainder of this plan will, by general topic, introduce
goals,
objectives and
strategies which comprise the township ' s
future plan.

August 21,

1987

-111-

�EXISTING SERVICE AREAS OF FILER TOWNSHIP

-......-...

Public Water and Sidewalks
Paved Roads

10 Minute Fire Response Limit

---s
.,,-

--

Minute Fire Response Limit

j Mile Radius Around a Park

.._

1 Mile Radius Around a Park

--

~-

••
.
,."

••
•
•

•
.

.' I

/ r
ll

34 /
/

I

•• •

·•.

•

••

31

'1$ ...

••
••

••

···.J

I 1.••
-112-

...
.
,
••
I

_

••

..•• .

••

•
••

••

.

�FILER TOWNSHIP PLANNED SERVICE AREAS

riiinil Level

I: All paved roads, sidewalks, streetlights at each corner, public:
water, 5 minute fire response, parks within~ mile, solid waste pickup

llOfllll

II: Paved roads, frontage
[IIl] Level
within l mile, 10 minute fire

D

Level III: Only primary roads paved, 15 minute fi r e response, no new
road development, solid waste pickup.
.

I

I

- \l't;lr
~~ L

I
I

\

l.--1•

I

I

I'

I

1,

I

J

I

'

1

I

I

'

J
r/

/

J/,
I

~

I"

.

v---a.

I

I: l

23
~

iii.

--

t"j

:
I

j

~

~

~

)4

...,,. .
;

(

I -

i

--

-" .
l

'-

l;:;:j

i-

!

:

r·

,,,

I

3)

~- !

I

I

I

I

I

I

.

I

I

I

I
-113-

'

11

I

31

I

\

!

I

''-- r /

i

L1

'

)j

~

~~\
: I

ID

I

2S

'

~

'

\

••

~

-----

\ 11

'jj

i

28

.~

!

i

'

j t!i.

"t

i
;

\,,

7J

iJ

l

1

l.~
·tt

I

11t2·

.

ll

I

'

i

..."' i"'!~"
: lllM
• ·•

I

-

ll

~

I

,

~

:J

I

I

, tj

I
i

-

I

I

I

'

'

to land, infrequent streetlights, parks
response, solid waste pickup.

'
l

I
'·

�DEFICIENCIES IN PLANNED SERVICE AREAS

-

Area Needs Improved (Shorter Time) Fire Response

[[fl

Area Needs Additional Neighborhood Park

fl(ff§ Area Needs Road Upgraded to Pavement
Area Needs Extension of Public Water and Sewer

-114-

�LAND USE DEVELOPMENT
GOAL:

To preserve the attributes which comprise the high quality
of
life
in Filer
Township,
while at
the same time
accommodating population, commercial and industrial growth.
OBJECTIVE:
That commercial,
industrial
and residential
areas of
the township be consolidated in defined areas
to avoid higher casts of providing services to sprawled
development.
OBJECTIVE:
To maintain the township ' s population center,
residential
development at
the north end
of
the
township and along Manistee Lake adjacent to similar
development in Manistee City, Filer City and Oak Hill.
OBJECTIVE:
To use development of roads by the township as a
tool to direct land use development in Filer Township.
OBJECTIVE:
To work with land developers to persuade them to
develop
in areas
designated
residential
and
to
discourage development in rural areas.
OBJECTIVES: To develop Filer Township according to a land
use plan shown on the next page:

August

21.,

1987

-- 115-

�fl~ER TOWNSHIP LAND USE PLAN MAP
'

·::

1986
!

. . ..i ..

,,

,i

, I'

,,

.

i
..

I ;!

. .

, : , .,.

•

• . , ,I

COMMERCIAL
Re id ti a 1
Indus tr'..

C
0

' ·'4-,J
-

. ·-

'ti

Lakesh
envir

Agricultu

25

3j

( ./)

Forest

i

C

cu
\,_.
I-

Agricultural
l3

36

Residentia

Forest

5

4

3
-116-

2

�STRATEGIES:
1.
The area of Filer City and Oak Hill
should receive
urban residential
designation and be zoned for dense
residential
development
&lt;residential
and
some
commercial uses):
because the area is dominantly residential land
uses already.
because the area
is dominantly small
parcels
and/or subdivided.
because the area is characterized as two similar
neighborhoods, Filer City and Oak Hill,
with a
similar community character.
because the area has been historically densely
settled.
because the area is in a
single watershed which
drains toward Manistee Lake so industrial effluent
does not move into residential areas.
because the area already has a
high density of
housing.
because the area is condensed in a small defined
area.
because the area has a sidewalk network in place.
because the area has a water system in place.
because the area is adequately service by public
buildings and parks.
because the area has a primary and local county
r oad network in urban block pattern.
because the area is adjacent
to industrial and
commercial areas of activity.
2.
The area from Lake Michigan to U.S. 31 South along the
north part of Filer Township (Red Apple, Cherry, Maple,
Canfield Lake,
Merkey areas&gt; _should be designated
residential on the Land Use Plan map
and
zoned for
larger-lot residential development:
because the
area has residential
development
started in the area coupled with vacant land that
can be used for further development.
because the area is a mix
of newer subdivisions
and unsubdivided parcels.
because the
area has
potential
for
further
development by "infilling".
because the area
is confined to the northern
portion of the township
(with
the exception of
Lake Michigan shoreline development).
because the area is characteri~ed as three s i milar
neighborhoods, Lake Michigan shoreline, Cherry-Red
Apple Roads,
central Maple Road corridor, with c&lt;.
similar community character.
because the area has seen a
recent building boom
for residences.
because the dominant soil
type in the area lends
itself to on-site residential sewage disposal.
August 2 1, 1987

-117-

�I

becaus~ separate resort-type areas are not likely
to develop along the Lake Michigan shoreline.
because the areas already have a relatively high
density of housing.
because the
area is
adequately serviced by
schools; electric, phone utilities; postal service
and parts by natural gas and cable television.
because most of the area is adequately serviced by
public buildings and parks.
because most of
the area has county or private
roads.
The areas along Mapl~ Street and U.S. 31
South between
Preuss and Fox Farm Roads be designated as transition
areas to be zoned Agricultural
or
Resideritial, as
appropriate:
because both areas have developed
into stripdevelopment residences and have subdivisions and
small parcels.
because the Maple Road
area and part of U.S. 31
South area is recognized as part
of the Central
Maple Road corridor while the other part is within
the Agricultural neighborhood.
because historically both areas have been
in use
for forestry and farming.
because most of the area has soil types which lend
themselves to on-site residential
sewage disposal
but also portions have heavier soils likely to
present an-site sewage disposal
problems and
better suited for agricultural
uses and forestry
growth.
bec~.use the area is developing a
r-elatively high
density of housing.
because the
area
is
adequately serviced by
schools;
electric,
phone
utilities;
postal
service.
The areas along Manistee Lake in
the Filer City area
should receive heavy
industrial
designation and be
zoned Lakefront Industrial.
because the area is classified as industrial land
uses already.
because the
industrial
area
is
a
distinct
community with its own character.
because the area has historically been used for
industrial purposes.
because the area is
in a
single watershRd which
drains into Manistee Lake r-ather than intc nearby
residential areas.
because the
area
is
adequately serviced bv
electric, phone and gas utilities.
because the area is serviced by county primar y
class-A
roads,
railroad
and
shippinc
transportatio~ systems.

3.

4.

August

..., 1
..:.... .I.

'

1987

-118-

�importance to the county's
the area's
because of
economic base.
because
the
designation
complies
with
and
implements the Manistee Lake Management Plan.
The area
just south of Oak Hill and west of Filer City
should receive a light
industrial
designation
and be
zoned for the same:
because the area
is par·t1y L1sed for indust,--ial
pollution treatment facilities
and
has available
vacant land.
because the area is characterized as an indust,--ial
neighborhood
wit~
a
corresponding
community
character.
because the area does not have any commercial or
residential land uses within its boundaries.
because the area has Rubicon
sandy
soils which
provide
positive
characteristics
for
major
development.
because the Manistee County area seeks increased
employment opportunities for economic development.
because the
area
is close
to existing or has
availability to electric, gas, phone utilities.
because the area is close to the existing service
area for public water.
The area alond U.S.
31 South near Oak Hill should be
designated commercial and be zoned for the same:
because the area
is dominantly commercial land
uses already.
because
the
area
ha.s
small
parcels or
is
subdivided and
vacant
areas
for
further
has
development.
because the
area
is
adequately serviced by
electric, phone,
gas
utilities;
postal service;
cable television.
because the ar~a has or is close to a public water
system.
because the area
is contiguous
to
a
highway.
because commercial
development
is
an import 2.nt
aspect
of
economic
develop!Tlent
for
the count y
a.rea.
The south
end of
Manistee la k e should be designated
wetland and so zoned:
because the area is an e xi sting wetland.
because soils
in
the
area
are
indicati v e
of
wetland and generally preclude development.
because of the importance of wetlands protection.
because
the
designation
complies
with
and
implements the:i Manistee l_ake Management Pl an.
The major portions of southern Filer Township should be
designated
as
agricultural
and
should
be
zone~

5.

6.

7.

8.

August

~

1,

l 987

-119-

�.

~

u

9.

10.

August 21 ,

residential, larger
agricultural
(farming,
woodlots,
parcel size&gt;:
because the area has sparse residential uses, open
field,
agricultural,
woodlands,
wetlands,
land
uses already.
because the area has a larger proportion of larger
parcel sizes.
a
because
the
area
is · characterized
as
neighborhood with a similar community c h aracter.
because
the
area
is dominantly within
the
township's "level III" service area.
because the area is bisected by end moraines-type
soils; relatively flat sandy, loamy sand and clay
loam soil types.
because significant areas within
the designation
which are suspected not
to be acceptable for onsite sewage disposal systems.
because significant areas of
the designation are
locally exceptional farmlands.
because part of the area is serviced by a county
agricultural drain.
because there are areas of the designation which
are nationally prime and
regionally
important
timberlands.
The area by King Lake and
between Red
Apple, County
Line and Maple Roads should be designated forestry and
should be zoned forestry
(forest,
residential, large
parcel/open space&gt;: ·
because the area is dominantly woodland land uses
already.
because the area has a larger proportion of larger
parcel sizes.
because
the
area
is
characterized
as
a
neighborhood with a similar community character.
because the area
is
dominantly
within
the
township's "level III" service area.
because there are areas within the designation
which are suspected not
to be acceptable for onsite sewage dispo~al systems.
The area of
the Lake Michigan shoreline near Magoon
Creek should be designated:
because of the same reasons
given
iG
number 7 1
above.
the existence of
because of
the Maqoon Cr-eel :
Natur-al Area.
because of
the designation
of
the area
in the Manistee
Special
and
Unique Envi ronn1ent
County Land Use P l an.

1987

-120 -

�TRANSPORTATION
GOAL:

I

'--

\.... ,•

To provide safe automobile transportation
through the
township with
the miles of roads in existence in proportion
to development so roads are not built where development will
not occur
and road construction resources are concentrated
only in populated areas.
OBJECTIVE:
Establishment of speed controls and enforcement
of same should be done in residential areas.
STRATEGY:
The Filer
Township Board should work with
the Road
Commission
and Michi~an State Police
Traffic and Safety Division to identify problem
locations and to take corrective measures in those
areas.
separate
pedestrian
traffic
by
STRATEGY:
To
sidewalks in
southwest Oak Hill,
construction of
and between Oak Hill
Lake Winnogene Subdivision
and Filer City.
STRATEGY:
Start work on plans for bike path routes in
conjunction
with
the
Manistee
County Road
Commission for
(in
priority)
a
bike path from
Filer
City
Pool
to
Oak
Hill
Improvement
Association Park;
a
bike path from Oak
Hill
Improvement Association Park to northwest part of
the township; a bike path from
northwest part of
the township to Magoon Creek.
OBJECTIVE:
Main arteries maintained by the township should
run on
a north-south
axis for
through traffic, while
east-west
roads be maintained
as
local roads which
discourage traffic through residential areas.
STRATEGY:
Designate U.S. 31 South, Maple Street, Filer
City Road
and
Nelson Street as major through
routes in Filer Township,
and maintain a program
of maintenance . and reconstruction on those routes
as class-~ primary routes via coordination with
the Manistee County Road
Commission and Michiga~
Department of Highways.
STRATEGY:
Desi gr.ate onl v Merkey Road
and Twenty-First
and Twenty-Eighth Streets as
prim2ry e~st-west
routes with
the same maintenance programs
as
primary north-south routes.
STRATEGY:
All
7ther
roads should
be des1gn~d and
routed
to
b~
secondary
feeders
~r
locaJ
neighbarhoo(1
str-ee~s;
laid
01.,t,
designed, with
~ul-de-sacs, curves, stop signs so they
are net
through r □ ut~s,
and in
effect discourage traffic
traveling through a~ area.
the tm..:nsh i p · s
nBJECTIVE:
All roads should
be paved
in
service level areas I and I I .
STRATEGY:
Pave Adamcza~ Road, Yoder ~rive , Cherry Road
(south end),
Critter
Trai I,
Ir,di a.n
Tr.:.i l (east
end)
Maywood
Street
and
connectors, Red Apple

August

2 l.,

1987

-121-

�Road (between Ramona and Maple&gt;, Anthony Road.
If
the road is not a county road, paving should be
financed by means of a loan
from the township to
be repaid,
with
interest,
through a
special
assessment on property fronting on the road.
STRATEGY:
To construct
new roads
in areas of
development within residential,
commercial
and
light industrial
areas t~ entice and encourage
development and subdivisions.
STRATEGY:
To construct an alternate route for truck
traffic to replace use of Twenty-First and TwentyEighth Streets to go from U.S. 31 ta the Manistee
Lake area industrial district.
OBJECTIVE:
To reduce fire department response time to the
Red Apple area north of Magoon Creek.
STRATEGY:
Improve access from the Oak Hill fire
station to the Red Apple Subdivision area.
OBJECTIVE:
Use construction of roads as a
tool to direct
land use in Filer Township.
STRATEGY:
Develop new local roads, and upgrade local
roads only
in
areas
designated
industrial,
commercial, and residential (level I and level I I
service areas) by this plan.

August. :'. l ,

l 987

-122-

�·~

~~

RECREATION
GOAL:

•

To have equitable distribution of
park facilitjes that
serve all residential areas and to provide the township with
a variety of park facilities.
OBJECTIVE:
To have at least one park within 1/2 mile of all
residences
in the
"level
I"
service area of
the
township.
STRATEGY:
Maintain and
improve existing
parks in Oak
Hill and Filer City.
STRATEGY:
Replace equipment,
repair- tennis court,
Hi 11
Improvement
landscaping
at
the
Oak
Association Park.
OBJECTIVE: To have at least one park within one mile of all
residences
in the
"level
II"
service area of the
township.
STRATEGY:
Maintain and
improve all existing parks in
the township.
STRATEGY:
Obtain land (set aside in a new subdivision,
etc.&gt;
in the northwest portion (Cherry, Merkey,
Wildwood, Red Apple Roads)
of
the township for
construction
of
a
neighborhood
park/playground/ballfield.
STRATEGY:
Enter into an agreement,
or land exchange,
or
use permit with the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources so Filer Township can develop
the Canfield Lake access site into a beach and
neighborhood playground.
OBJECTIVE:
To tie the township park system together with a
network of non-motorized transportation facilities.
STRATEGY:
Start work on plans for bike path routes, in
conjunction
with
the
Manistee
County Road
Commission, for (in priority) a bike path from the
Filer City Pool
to the Oak Hill
Improvement
Association Park;
a bike path from
the Oak Hill
Improvement Association Park
to the northwest
portion (future park) of the township; a bike path
from the northwe~t portion of
the township to
Magoon Creek Natural Area.

Aug•.,st ......
....:. J

,

1987

-123-

�•

•

INFRASTRUCTURE
(Water System, County Drains, Utilities, Schools,
Public Buildings, Fire Department):
GOAL:
To maintain an
active capital
improvement program, to
insure needed and desired ~ublic facilities exist.
OBJECTIVE:
To maintain
the existing township
public
buildings, storm drains and
fire department equipment
at current capacity and conditio~.
STRATEGY:
Maintain a regular schedule of preventative
maintenance and repairs as needed for all township
buildings.
STRATEGY:
Maintain a regular schedule of preventative
maintenance,
and
repairs
as
needed
for
fire
department rolling stock and to maintain a regular
schedule of
depreciation
and
replacement
of
rolling stock.
STRATEGY:
Maintain, by repair and reconstruction on an
as needed basis, drywell storm drains.
GOAL:
To have adequate water
supply for
fire fighting purposes
in all parts of the township.
OBJECTIVE:
A fire
department standpipe wjthin 1 -1/2 miles
of . all areas in service level areas II and III and fire
hydrants every
600
feet in service level area I.
STRATEGY:
Install
a
standpipe
in the Fox Farm-Red
Apple Roads area -- in the Lakeland Subdivision .
STRATEGY:
Install a standpipe in
the Red Apple-Che~ry
Roads area.
STRATEGY:
Install . fire hydrants every
600
feet at
the same
time
any
water
main
is extended, or
replaced.
OBJECTIVE:
Expansion of the Filer Township water system to
service all of service area level I.
GOAL:
Maintenance of adequate water capaci~y and
water pressure
in urban areas of the township.
OBJECTIVE:
Expansion of the township
public water system
throughout service area I.
STRATEGY:
Correct
a
water
pressure deficiency and
expand
the
water
system
along
the U.S.
31
commercial corridor
in phases,
as recommended by
the Water System Extension F'rel i mi na.ry E.o_gineer i IJ.9.
Studv:
1.
Construct
a
pressure booster
station
and
construct a water main from Maywood Street to
U.S. 31 South along Merkey Road.
2.
Construct a water main
from
Merkey Road to
the
existing
water
main
extended
west of
Twenty-Fourth Str-eet along U.S. 31 South.
~
Construct
a
water
main
from
the extended
Twenty-Fourth
Street
main
to Twenty-Eighth
Street along U.S. 31 South.
Const,-uc:t:
a
main
from
Merkey Road,
4.
north r:&gt;1"1
U.S. 31
South, east on Care Center
Aug,,st

21,

1987

· -124-

�ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
GOAL:

To develop
a
strong regional
(county-wide)
economy to
solidify Filer Township's role as a bedroom community and as
an
inseparable component of
the
Manistee
Lake area
specialty-complete shopping center.
OBJECTIVE:
Increase employment and decrease unemployment of
residents of Filer Township and . the county.
STRATEGY:
Continue to work cooperatively with county
Economic
Development
Council
and
Planning
Commission
for
area
efforts
for
economic
development.
STRATEGY:
Improve infrastructure (water mains, roads)
to enhance
commercial
and
light
industrial
development;
extension of
Twenty-Eighth Street
west of U.S. 31 South, and
the "Filer City Truck
Route", for examples.
STRATEGY:
Protect the environment/quality of life as
an important
amenity
used
to
attract new
businesses to the area .

•

•

August

21,

1987

-126-

�( _,"

NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
GOAL:

Protect the natural features and wooded areas from dense
development.
OBJECTIVE:
Retain areas zoned for
forest, to accommodate
larger
lot
parcels
for
low density residential
development.
OBJECTIVE:
Have specific protection measures for the Lake
Michigan shoreline.
STRATEGY:
Institute a
uniform setback from the bluff
along the Lake Michigan shoreline.
STRATEGY:
Study and
decide upon
future zoning
amendments to protect sand dune features along the
Lake Michigan shoreline.
OBJECTIVE:
Protect surface water areas and related habitats
from dense developments.
STRATEGY:
Require setbacks from all surface waters .

•

·.....__~..,.:

August

•

2

t,

t '?87

·· 127 ...

�....... _..~__....... .............. · ~., • . ...... 1.. ,,.,...,......,........_ _
..,,...
.....~ ~ -,. ·11

e.
~ --

HISTORIC AND CULTURAL, POPULATION, OTHER:
GOAL:

Protect historic and cultural features in the township.
OBJECTIVE:
Take steps to provide recognition to certain
sites in Filer Township.
STRATEGY:
Encourage the placement of
the Golden Filer
house,
carriage house and guest house in the
National Historic Register of Places.
STRATEGY:
Encourage signing and listing on the state
register of historic places old schools which are
still architecturally significant.
STRATEGY:
Encourage the placement of Sands Cottages
(Twenty-First ' Street)
on the National Historic
Register of Places.

[F'LAN.FLRJ

... .
...._ J.

~

-128-

�CERTIFICATE OF CLERK
RESOLVED, That the Comprehensive Plan for the development
of the unincorporated portions of Filer Township,
Manistee County, Michigan, which Comprehensive Plan
is dated February 19, 1988~ be and the same is hereby
approved and adopted, in its entirety, as the Comprehensive
Plan for the development of the unincorporated portions
of Filer Township, Manistee County, Michigan.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Clerk attach a true
copy of said Comprehensive Plan to the minutes of
this meeting.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, That the Clerk send a certified
copy,of the within resolution to the Secretary of
the Filer Township Planning Commmission for the records
and files of said Planning Commission.

I, David Rhodea, duly elected and qualified Clerk
of Filer Township do hereby CERTIFY thatthe above is a true,
accurate and correct copy of a resolution of the Filer Township
Board adopted at a regular meeting held on June 7, 1988.

•

•

~
Filer Township Clerk

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008237">
                <text>Filer-Twp_Comprehensive-Plan_1988</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008238">
                <text>Filer Township Planning Commission, Filer Township, Manistee County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008239">
                <text>1988-02-19</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008240">
                <text>Filer Township Comprehensive Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008241">
                <text>The Filer Township Comprehensive Plan was prepared by the Filer Township Planning Commission on February 19, 1988 and approved on June 7, 1988.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008242">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008243">
                <text>Filer Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008244">
                <text>Manistee County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008245">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008247">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008248">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008249">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008250">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038321">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54695" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58966">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/e777127b68d69631f1d98bf65f65321f.pdf</src>
        <authentication>01101a0ed6077b3bb198c983b5d0d5f7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008236">
                    <text>Managing the Township's Growth and
Resources through the Year 2010

-

r,..~

�FENTON CHARTIR T

MASTER PLAN

�I.

IN I FICJl)tJCTIC)tf

ra..,..
IL

• • • • • • • • • .. • • .. .. •

Plan.

BACKGROUND STUDIES •
l!xl8llng Davelapnrant ,,... .
Papu
••

��Over 119 yaarl tl'9 FallM . . . . . . . ., .
reaaon for 1h11 .-&amp;h • ¥8dld and btllCII
and hlCl'elllonal On&gt;wli - . . . . . . . . .
and ....... of the Job ......
County anc1 e11a . . . Ollllld8 ot Alnlmr n. .a
Townahlp'l nNlldlnllll Nlllng 11k1 arlCI
U11ban

...... ,.

110W1b ha8 C1111•1d null ,____

�orig11'81plMwada'NlapldfarFalDI
ainnt nm 11e u
D1p11tmaat ot .......,.

orc:lnanoea -

......, - - . . . . ...

SlnCa Nt
•
general Plllllllnll
the Ccultr and
many)'en.

1

.-,ia
liownaND

Beglnrllng In . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . .,
Hllnnllr,
andaecllG8 AtilM-.. RlllllmlTIIIIIIII•

...............

1

���enton Township is a rural, recreationally-oriented residential community of some 10.000
ople.

The area should continue to service the demand for high quality reaidetllfat

pportunities for the regional empJoyment centers. The numerous natural takes ptOYfde Ile
opportunity for a very congenial residential environment.

9'1Y16NAW GOVNT'(

~CdUN"IV

MONTROSE

rwP

□

CITY

JF

.VONTROSE

□~0TIS'VU£

������kI1
l !!
1 : I
9-

I

i-

..

l

I ..

§ -=----=-

������BACKGROUND STUDIES
Between 1988 and 2008, MESC expects Genesee County to lose 3,240 jobs, a decrease of
2.3%. The largest decline will be noted in the manufacturing sector, with a loss of 6,500 jobs.
An increase of 2, 1oo service jobs is anticipated in the 10-year period.
The study area will outperform the rest of Genesee County, experiencing an increase of 8,022
jobs, or a growth rate of 24.4%. Service industries will produce 4,290 of the new jobs, while
1,393 retail jobs will also be added. Employment losses in the City of Flint and o:her parts
of the country will more than offset employment Increases in the study area, producing the
overall decline for Genese·e County.

Between 1988 and 2008, the share of County

employment located In the study area will increase from 23.6 % to 30%.
Employment projections for the County show total employment rising slightly (1,000 jobs) over
the next twenty years while population levels should increase by nearly 36,000 people.
Several segments of the employment spectrum should stabilize or decrease slightly including
farm employment, agricultural services, mining, construction, transportation communications and
utilities and governmental employment. However, the most significant change, already alluded
to in the Bllnton Study, will be the reduction in manufacturing employment (nearly 15,000 jobs)
and the resultant increase In retail and service-related employment.

Figure 5 charts these

projected changes within the Genesee County employment sectors.

Fenton Charter Township

Page

16

�BACKGROUND STUDIES

Figure 5

Genesee Cowuy Employment
Trends (1970 - 2010)

70000

Finance, Insurance,
Real Estate and
Services

60000

Retall Trade
.c
"'

Manufacturing

.......
0

0

.8

40000

g

z

30000

20000

Government

10000

Transportation,
Communication,
utilities • Wholesale Trade
Ag. Services, Mining
and Construction

o~----,-.------,--....----,..-~----1
1990
2000
1910

1980

Y•

FeAtOn charier Townih1p

2010

Source: Woods &amp; Pool. Inc. 1990.

Agriculture

��----

Map) alllOldbg
W&amp;INIIRld t,/ the SOIi
Map (Map 1) - - - · -. . .I
to
hfgll01ganiOCOlllld

.,..d ...........lllllntlllllllll911111
I!

��i)
--

,
411

✓

•
-·~
::a

I

,

---

.

I-·

)

��......

4 ..

I

,

, . ;.( 'n.. -ci
n

1

•

r
·-...J

~(

11!

\......_ _ _ ,..-.......
I

•

ETLANDS A

...

������. . . . . . . . . . .1•

-

•

IDWlld a CDhllMllbalil¥a - - • ■1111-llff

..... « .............
fOllowlngMapL

�LAK

*

TE

Pultllo MC. . .

HE

�TABLE I ILUOR FENT0H TOWNSHIP LAKES

..... __
Ula~

..........
Llllal.-vl.Jl

Dllat'LIM

........

......

WataalNld
(.AcrN)

1137

.... ...... ......

SUlfaal

Araa(AaalO

845

Ellnllall

Pl. (1111.)

174

Lqlh
(IIIN)

14.53

Waterahed

Shorallne
Develoement

Wettand.l

Wellllndl

v....a

~

Conwnercla1'
lndualrlal

Commercial
(l.t.)

local

Undewloped

(IJ.)

flNldentlal
(llouelng)

(U.)

(Percent)

Vacant
(Acrea)

5800

l57000

3900

76700

7.6

482.73

112059

33.97

2380

220

29.7

72.20

41.48

(1)

3700

0.00

(25)

5340

0

7500

28.8

7.96

56.85

0.38

0

5540

30.7

49.86

81.64

2.42

0

16840

34.4

304.94

284.71

0.54

1600

59200

48.5

1155.39

344.24

10.99

Publlc
(Acres)

(AcrN)

(645)

114
16

30

14

174
870

0.70
1.42

1100
· 2180

(34)

134

.
28

l70

1.05

1700

3840
(37)

,

870

1511

480

889

680

252

889

7.56

13320

26280
(183)

300

39900

33.4

311.33

367.59 ·

0.99

617

152

878

2.43

n40

neo

0

15500

49.9

462.80

154.12

0.00

.......
.......

198

134

889

2.61

1000

12800
(119)

0

13800

7.2

143.69

53.39

1.10

213

25

114

0.67

3520

0
(0)

0

3520

100.0

18857

2451

0

90

12

874

0.61

1000

2240
(15)

0

3240

30.9

c.ladLIM

300

IO

841

2.95

6520

9080
(64)

0

15600

41.8

90

12

851

0.81

3180

1080
(4)

0

4260

74.6

-

274

1837

24fll

-

50.24

81,540

1m40

6020

265300

30.7

uuPCIMmlll

.......

.......

.........

..,.Lace

...

590

3.19

5800

11040
(80)

11.21

28700

28900
(330)

(72)

���---

IIIIJlC

J

J

,
I

'

I

I
I

•
I

I
I

��BACKGROUND STUDIES
LAND USE
For discussion purposes, the Township consists of two areas, the lake communities and rural
Fenton Township. Throughout the 1920's and 1930's small vacation home developments
began to ring the major lakes In Fenton Township. Since the early 1950's the vacation homes
have been converted to year-round residences. This development trend continued over the

next forty years until the existing lake frontage has been nearly completely developed.
Residential growth was largely the result of employment opportunities In the Flint areL
The vast majority of the lake front homes are now year-round residences.

Lake shore
development has often altered the shoreline by creating marina Inlets and canals to expand
the lake frontage as evidenced by the Wenwood. Golden Shores and Ponemah Gardens
developments. Small lake community commercial centers have developed along Fenton Road,
Long Lake Road and Sliver Lake Road.
Residential densities within the lake communities average three to four dwellings per net acre
or that which Is expected In normal single-family urban settings. This density can only be

supported by pubHc sanitary sewer service. Otherwise, the water quality of the lakes wo
deterlora18.

Awai Fenton Township la characl8t'tzed by larger, 111-aawerad l'88ldenlllll _.._.._ modei*

sized farms and orchards with a scattertng of 8lables and equl8trlan training
community supports two golf oourl88 and one privat8 airport.

Tbe

U.S. 23 has a18o had a pronounced eflact upon land
patl8ml. TIie u.s 23/1rlalllllllllft
Road lnterdlanges
creal8d mixed wrnrne,dll and .....,. CC&gt;fflCIII'

Raad In aectlonl 2 and 3

cr-...s
1imnllhlll

�FENTON CHARTER TOWNSHF' LAND USE INVENTORY (1990)

....
2
3

'

5

•

TGlal
AIN

Vacant
AnNI

Resldendal
Use

Commaroial
Use

812
574
617
633

394

217
230
150
282
257
211
255
295
181

0.5
7.0
82.0
5.0
2.0
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
9.0
11.0
0.5
0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
1.9
15.0
5.0
25.0
0.0
13.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
0.0
182.0

661
817
802

613
668
664
314

482
548

'l87
480

507

634

528
312
482
483
276
284

181
674

542

468
187

230
339
267
392
404
347
318
475
425
91
296
251
81

100
444
342
448

155

397
316
155
110
73

438
184
339

54

205
154
294
159
368
63

32
80
73
85
129
97
139
75
136
68

540
122

383

290

113
89
156
232

15..184

9.081

4.880

577

Industrial
Use

0

67
25
79
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

Public
Use

Number
of Units

n

83

30

0
36
8
0

3.19
0.88
2.99
1.65
4.35
5.55
5.55
3.51
2.96
0.96
0.48
3.35
1.22
0.36
1.37
0.58
2.47
5.32
2.81
1.44
0.36
0.82
3.47
0.89
0.86
0.83
0.55
3.31
1.21
0.73
1.21

0
40
21
0
0
0
0
0
0
175
9
0
3
27
11
0
160
0

262
54
79
53

39
47
80
50

71
423
51
242
447
268
107
13
20

0
31
0
0
0
0
0
0
0

0
277
0
0
0
0

59
402
119
61
62
159
82
206
27
129
315

203

858

4,034

0

Residential
Density

8

�������BACKGROUND
the northeast portion of the Township. Map 10 shows a two-mile tire service ndll8 •

a

general Indicator of fire service adequacy.
Library - The Genesee District Library System operates two branches In the Fenton

Community; one In the City of Linden, the other In the City of Fenton. The books and staffing
for both Is financed by a county-wide mlflage. The local community must S1ipp0rt the buldlng,
grounds, maintenance and utilltles for the faclllty. No Fenton Township general fUnds ant Ul8d
to support the library building, yet a large portion of the library patrons are Township residents.
Parka and Recreation

A recreational land and faclllty Inventory Includes private parks

subdM8lonl. prlval8

courses, gun clubs, state, schoOI district. and county lands as we as Townsh propet1las.
A complete Inventory Includes over 630 acres of land. Of this total, 381 acres are golf course
or private park and the balance Is pubDc lands.
Table 11 shows a complete lnventofy of each tacility.

�FaplHty
Lake Fenton School

�Applying recognized state and national recreallonal alandaldl to a comnu1
misleading. The following standards show a present need for two tennis court. 18 addlllonal
pia1ic tables and one basketball court.

By the year 2000 with a maximum growth scenario of 17,400 popdatlon the need would
inaease to:
3 tennis courts.
one pool,
4 playgrounds.
67 picnic tables,
two basketball courts, and
two baUflelds.

The school systems within the Township are all experiencing a laCk of avaDab1e apaae for
recreational programs. Adult recreation softball, baake1ball. and volleyball Is llrrllted.
a
result, recreation for informal league play as wel as Indoor racna1ion facilltles wl be needed
as population growth contlnueS.

�BACKGROUND STUDIES
Table 12
Fenton Township Recreational lnwntory. 1990

and State Rea Ntlonal Standarde

Township
lnv1ntorv

11@m
Tennis Courts
Outdoor Pool
Soocer Field
Sledclng Hill
Shotgun Range
Playgrounds
Picnic Tables
Ice Rink (outdoor)
Ice Rink (Indoor)
Golf Course
Bicycle Trajl

Ba.,ketbaJICourt

Ballfield

Archery Range
local Park Land

0
0
0
0
0

1
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
5

Fenton

&amp;II
1
0
0
1
2
2
30
0
0
2
0
1

4

0
630

Township

0emu

2.5
0.25
.50
0.25
0
3
50
0

00.50
0.40
0.25 mlle8
2
3
0
100

Need

.!ill

m2Q

2
0
0
0
0
0
18
0
0
0

3
1
0
0
0
4
87
0
0
0

.25 mlles
1
0
0
0

0.44
2
2
0
0

Based upon the following atlonal Recreation and Palk As8oclatloft standards.

JP8 of Opportunity

NRPA
Standards
10/1,000
1150,000
1/5000
1 ,000

Plan
Standald(llpop.)

10/1,000
t 008
1

�BACKGROUND STUDIES

swnmary of Findings
Analysis of demographic, economic, environmental and land use data has derived the foRowlng
conclusions:

1.

Fenton Township has experienced a 44% population growth since 1960.

2.

The populace Is wealthier, more educated, and the housing stock Is of better quality
now than in 1980 and In comparison to the balance of Genesee county.

3.

While employment opportunities have expanded within the Township, most residents

work - outside of the Townshlp.
4.

Higher density residential development Is locat8d on and around the seventeen natural
lakes.

5.

Public sanitary sewers service nearly all of the lake residential devetopment

6.

Commercial development Is dispersed and lacks a central ldenllfylng location.

7.

Wetlands and other soils Umttattons have Influenced and wll continue to llmlt tututa
residential growth.

8.

At11ve fanning operations are ~ t tor pr888rvll'IQ . - apace and townaNp
Identity.

9.

Flasidantlal development II prlmlUIIY lakl

10.

Lake waler quallty
devalopmert.

�BACKGROUND STUDIES
13.

The number of households by the year 2000 should range between 4,500 and 6,000

dwellings. There are presently approximately 4,000 dwellings In 1he Township.

��GOALS,OBJECTIVES,PO
In terms relevant to community planning, goals, objectives and policies give a Master Plan the
litllosophical guidance it needs to address the present issues and advance plans Into the
future. They are defined as follows:
Goals

are overall broad statements that provide a focus for future
discussions.

Objectives

are more specific statements of a means to attai1 the goal
statement.

Pollcl

are very specific. acllon-ortentad statements that would

he_,

achieve the goals and objectives. Polley statements would provide
Justification to revise or draft new ordinances or regulations or
finance specific capital improvements.
goals and objectives were developed during work sessions which focused on local
!Qnnlng Issues and established a purpose of the Master Plll1 The goal s1a18mentS wera
derived from a statement of purpose and are expreaaed • communfly planning goal
Slatamenta. The goals (or purposes) provide o
general Q11 11t11lflll'!III for
master planning efforts.

~es. developed separately from the goals. are a
of ..... 1881118d and an11111111111
llldar each goal (purpose) statement. The
and COffl&amp;DC)ldtm otlkd1V81 R

below.

�GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POUQES

GOAL 1.

Maintain the resldentlal quallty of Fenton Township.

Objedives
a

Promote quality single-family housing, in a low and moderate density and maintain the
rural character of the community.
Provide sufficient open space to serve each dwelling unit either through generous yard
spaces or common open space areas.

c.

Preserve the off-lake areas of the Township for larger lot. agricultural and open space
residential uses.
Plan medium and high density residential development In specific areas property served
With public and/or private utilities and adequate Ingress and egress.

e.

Encourage a high percentage of home ownership and permanent housing types.

f.

Separate sJngle-tamlly and multiple-family resldentlal areas from non-resJdentlal U888.

g.

Provide an alternative to continued sprawl and loss of farmlands by encouraging cluster
development In low and medium density areas and take advantage of natural tan'aln

vistas

and rolling topography In permJttlng such development to occur.

h.

Encourage additional hou8lng opportunities for senior cillzens.

L

The acceptabltt population for the li,..natlln

10 wffl be

and 16,000. A pop dalon 111111111111
burdens on T-rlatllp roads Aftlji1M1111111111111 ,... .nv

1W11111Un.idlldll1i0Wlllhl)

12,500
place . . . . .

�GOALS, 08JEC11VEB.
GOAL 2.

Provide necessary township commerclal IIMC8I while reta1
resldentlaJ character.

a

Discourage spot and marginal strip commercial development

b.

Provide locations for attractive local shopping with adequate spacing throughout the

Township to serve expected needs for many years.

c.

Plan for commercial uses where there existing or projected support population, or
where there will be adequate draw from the highway trade na.

d.

Place commercial uses at locations of easy access where Ingress and egress
impede traffic flow.

e.

Allow local commerclal development only In planned areaa to avoid epot and
locations.

GOAL 3.

Allow

pproprtate

or high l8Ch

employment

L

Maximize the uee of avalllable lranlll)OIIIIIOII faclllll
01nau1trta1

b.
C.

not

to provide IIIC-IIIIY

�GOALS, OBJECTIVES, POLICIES
I.

Set aside land adequate to provide an employment base for the residents of the
Township.

GOAL 4.

Provide for the sate and efficient movement of people and gooda within

the Town hip.

a

Plan a network of road connections to complete the major and secondary road systems
of the Township.

b.

Correct existing road paving Inadequacies (partlcularly unsafe areas).

c.

Monitor traffic volumes and correct roads which are functioning beyond safe operating
capacity.

GOAL 5.

Preaerve the envlronmentaJ q

lty and

11a11....

l

Maintain or Improve the water quality of lak88 aid

b.

Minmtze the overcrowdng of lake 81981 through land
conrol.

d.

t

IINIOl.llal of tlw

and

Townehlp.

��IIASTER PLAN

A Master Plan is a statement of community public policy. It Is a description of community
aspirations and the ·road-map• toward the attainment of the Idealized Fenton Char18r
Township.

The goal and objective statements provide the phllosophlcal basis for the plan and the
background studies become Ill factual basis. The plan atlampts to present a strategy to
allocate scarce public financial resources toward the attainment of stated publlc policies. Thus,
the Plan becomes a series of rational choices al1'()rlg many reasonable allematlves.

The Master Plan for the Charter Township of Fenton contatna a land use plan, a natural
resources plan, a parks and recreallon plan, a comrnuntty facltlel plan, a transpOrtatlon plan,

and a housing plan.
land Use

or alt8mallve land i a stiategles u wel • Input racelved from the
studies, pollclea and citizen quealonAalr8, a land
concept PB' can be
The concept plan (Map 11) roughl)- recorrmendl cortClfUII aid
thesl

Based upon the analysls
background

developed.

areas.
The concept land uses are clvldad Into vartous sub-zones. TI18S8 u,.zonea •
follows:
I.

Service Corl1dol8

IL
Ill.

Lake R8111d8111111

�r •

...,
!I

~I
} ·----ti

J-

Map 11

CONCEPT PLAN
Service Corridor
II

Ill

a. Thompson

b. N. Long Lake

Rural / Agriculture
Lake Realdentlal

FENTON

CHARTER TOWNSHIP

c. Fenton

~=r----==
...............
_.,...,.-.-.

._.

nri.......J. II

��Figure 7
FENTON CHARTER TOWNSHIP
SUB-PLANNING ZONE - STRATEGIES

SUI ZONE 1
SERVICE CORRIDOR

-ZCNE2
RURAL AGRICULTURE

u...

AlllfflalML,ndUIN

Altemdve Lad
o Residential
• Medium Density

ProfasaionalJOff
High Tech

Businea

0
0

~Agricuftln

Aelidlnlilll
• l.Ollf DenlitV
o Pd I Open Space

Commercial
- Local Commercial
- H"1iway Commercial
o lndullrial

Alllmadve 11--a■IINIII Slrataga

Alllmatlve llanqs ■ 1111 . . . . . . .

• W8llandlld
- Sol EIOlian Conni Id
- Floodplain Allgullllonl

enta.08ii..,, of sm, bw•
• W.U.ldakA

• Sol En.Ion Con1r01 kA
• Floodplain Regulallona

~ of Colf!ty Hewth Dept

Enloamlnt of s.a llGilfation

SUI ZONE I
LAKE RESIDENTIAL
Alllmallve Land
0
0

~Agricutan

Reeidential
• Low Denaity
- Medium Denlily
o Parka I Open Space

Alllrnadve ........................

Enlorcament of M

Lt4◄;dan

. ':.',_ldlM

- FlnNlnd Pr-..ullian

• Sall!lallonCcdrdld.
llllarll
• F
wallDII

. . . afCaunlVHNli\Oepf.

fl'&amp;'

-Sa,aielllldl
- Well

- A

of County He!IJ Dept.

• Wells

1.oca1 zm
- Land-■ ...--­

• I.and ... niguladana
lotllze&amp; ......
• tteight
• Sign conrai

u.-

. 1.at••---• Height

. Galt• l!d■ 11 ►-....-.
- Qlara:.:plMUIII

· LandlM . . . . . .
Lotlilel...,.._

.·

...._

��E AGRICULnJRI!
SPACEPRESl!RV~

RURAL RESK&gt;EN11AL:

UIIBANl8UBUR

�IIASTEII

LIGHT INDUSTRIAL:

HIGH TECH INDUSTRIAL:

Manufacturing, light assembly, warehou&amp;lng facllllas
and outdoor storage yards lncluclng the aaacdat8d
parkJng . . . and ancma,y amnlnlBtrallve offlol
Ptmllc ulllly office buildngs and subltallOn8 . .

Included In 1h18 categOry.
Umlled lndullrlal ac11vtty areas lhat
tlexlJlllY
In atandald8 to allow for research and ctewloprnant.
office use and sales activllles tn conjll1Ctlon with
light assembly

and warehousing.

����. . Non-realdential .....

nm an olherwla6 a111act1ve 111aa1nn1.
Mordar to

lfflflllall'l,allll

be adoplad.
appllad 1D al OOIIIIMlrall

1)

Develop . . . . .ell

alllamMN1111.

����w,&amp;llng the surtace
,oots. This change

...,. lmffl8dlatelY
groundW8l8r. W'ellendl
urban runoff.

�Lake Management
Fenton Township lakes can be claSSffled as meec,trophlc. The laka8 do 8hoW
eutrophlcatlon, or the accumulation of nutrtenta In the wal8r and lake botlOffl IIIClldallll ._.,..
produce Increasing amounts of aquatic planlS. The L-oaaaed fk.lltllntl
clarity and quality of the water. However, swlmmlnQ and boallnG can
problems and conditions have lmprOY8d with the 11llltalafl0n of

Ile
I be 8lljDy9d wllNlUl

aewer ayatllffl&amp;.

lmpactS of developm8flt within 1h11 lak8 .-,ahed haV8 lnCnl•ld .....,.... and - levels, which In turn haY8 lna'98lld plant growth and dl08111d waler uumllY• over
extended period of time, all the lak89
haV8
In wllh aeclm8l1t and ..,....., at1lftillill

marshes and wetlands- Waterlhed deV8IOPffl8l1l merelY acceleral8S the natutal pn,ol88 of
eutrophlcatlon. What would haY8 takeh possl&gt;IY tenS of tt,ousandl of years to compete, may
take only a few hundred years with unch8Ck8d u,banlzatlon
The thirteen mal« lak88 1n Fentan Tow111111p have _,.,. conwnon faCIDfS.
arty total abS8nC8 of lndUl(IIII - - - 11an one percent (80 . , . ,
Ul8d for commerdal or lndt,11111111 t:IIIDOIII and

there

peroent (45 iCAIS)

watersheds {Ponemah and ~

waldaedl 18 served by publlC sanitary sewers or sewer
~ areas. ThU8, any ..-ca of pollullon or
AH urban develoPffl8rlt
tervtce can easlY be acllllltclld
OIII apecl8I source •point sourer, rathat sadlm8A19,
Mltrlent leY8IS dOII
- • • fll0hlnG l'8 1akal originate nm an1ffla1 feed • and

•• .-na-.

road

and

sawn fef1111zer8•

._.... out genend seaa ot concam
areas of miner madelal9

'kllliflldolMI and ..,...,_

are llsted a followS.

•
fflllor

�Existing Land Use. The actlvttieS wHhln the entire wal8f1hed do affeCt lake waler qually I
the watershed Is over seventy percent deWIOpld, 118 amount of "'1J8MOUS areal creatad by
roofs, pavement and parking lots, and the aasodal8d runoff II a major ooncam. Mudelale
concern Is Indicated for watersheds rangk1{, betW9en 50 and 70 percent tJevelOped.

concern Is expressed for thOS8

watarShld wllh

111111 lftJ percant ~

1111t.1mlll• has con!IPlatiw •uatr!ICI

Shoreline Development. oevek)pm81'1t of.,,,

the shoreline configuration and ves,etatlOII• Welllr1dl oll8n 819 tied and lawn tert!ll8•
road salts from the streets and
flOW dlrecllY
the lake. Lak8S wllh ahOrlllrll8

~

that are greater than 70 percent dlWlaPld
of 1111P CIIN)IIIIL $llarllW ranging
50
Ill 70 percent dav9IOP8d 819 of n,odllnll8 . - ; and al,ONln8II 181a than 50 p.,c.-il
developed are of minor COi IC8ffl.
Shoreline Wetlands.

ccn,,a,aaly, 1111188 wlll

~ amounlS of ahOralna

wellaJlds . . a

concern since Iha c1SnJP11an of
. . . . . _. dllllllbllD 111&amp; shorellM claa'8- lie
natural fillration of alllffll,illlll runQll dlll8 llr
......._ and dac:niaa nalUnll hablllll !or
bird, fish and mammal p i ~ 1... lL . . . . . .
. .. . 1t8I 70 percent wellandB ate of
major concern; 50 70 .,__. • - •
of a modetal8 COflCll"l'I. and
than 50% .,.

a minor concern.

Contributing Ryngff - • .11.-i.-• no runoff from other lak8 watarsMdSindependllffl of the
Crookad, Loon,

would be for a
nalghbortnll

chamll ...

..., 181181 Buc:lmlJN,

1111

They

are

a,,an. Pina, ~ - Pat1B.

11118 ce11gaqr o1 mnar concem. con:em

..-...-.11111n___ cannacaon

betW88II theS8 llk88 and the oll8r

IMIII .. aannealld 11r . i

_ . bo111

0111¥ nlOllenlllt a,nlllbullr',I runoff . . . . ftllOft from other lake8 wllhfn and oul8lde•the
lhn,ugh Lak8 Ponemah TlluS, watw quality
flellfl oullkle the lake watershed.

�13
LAKE WA1USHED

•

0

0

•

0

0

I

I

I

I

I

•

0

I

I

I

I

I

0

0

'•
•
•

I

•
0

•
Dollar

:rRIX

0
I

0
0

0
0
0

•

0

•

I

•

•
•
0

•
'•
•

0

0

I

•
•

0

0

0

0

I

0

0

•

0

0

�Stormwater. Water quality of
water surface area is more 801'1/h kAl•IG
large watersheds. Pine and
their relatlvely smal wat.,.,NICil

as moderate

concern.

Five categorleS of the -

lakes.

Their authority is

~

VIIV

s. A
14 on the dMIIKI

. . . . . . . - - - · · · ,. . . .

�----Nlll1'

...........-o1.........
.............

....
LuNorStrNffl8

~Ml.P.A.1ffl
Inland ..............

Id

Senaltlve Solla

Woodlanda

��Avoid disruption of

0

sensfflY8 sollS

or h

pllC8ffl8'1I o f ~

.,..

containing sensitive soRs-

Steep Slopes
o

Reier to the

Land capeblllr,.. lilld SMPSIOPN Ml!P niga,dnll OIB lacafoll

of slope8 over 12%.
0

Avoid dlsnJpllol'I of

containing steeP alOPI'·
0

Where necessatY, .,....
been issued-

•

ErOI\IOft Pennlt Ad 347 P.A. 1970 haS

����P'OYide a 1'888MI oapactty for
JQfetred population size NIIIIIIIINI
year 2010. The Townah~
-■
between 2,500 and 5,000

lncluclngthe
of-way. Thia right

hllen1lal factDr' In dallllllllnl. .
c:ommuntty COUid
primary county roadl - ·
~ detannlne WIIIIIR
lownahlp road , . .. . . .

.

following polclee
~

comm~
1)

2)

�������..

2)

Residential subdivisions shall provide

innOValve, cempact

,. -i18111ll'IIIIIII...._

public Infrastructure costs.
Housing Polley: To continue a

strong building code entorcemeRt ~ wM:11

1)

Ensure continuity of existing nelghbatbOOd quail)',

2)

Allow the conversion of

~ Y8C1111nn .....,

housing.

Housing Polley: To

preserw aalMI fam'll. aalllllla

new residential growth In aeware&amp; tak6 ....__. .,..
1)

Encourage large tot alzN ID
Plan Map.

2)

encourage 18108 tat 111111 Iii

Lakefront and

units

wm

~ _..

-

-=--k .- :·

_:::-1

�All stormwater ahal be ...,...,.,. f8tlllned IO Iller ~ tldllnarlL
Aocess to pubic roads

lbaUld be pnwillN. ,,,....,,. IMIII •- - ·

paved county prtmary ,oat
Lake

___

access shOUld be llfflll8d.

A management plan

-----

,_.,.....,
.,_.,1 - - ..,._
This ma, MClltCM a ·Clflell!III!-....,...

nutrients do not . .
tree zone.

Total I ~ . . . . . . . . raofl. sld8Wallll. l8J8l8S and parkin;g 181a
shoUld be llrnllad • .-, • ht total sft8 ~ or speaiflC measures be taken
to deCr88l8 . . ....,. ~ areas of the mats. parkinl • and 1re

Ilka.

the.-........ WIii
_ . at row teet above ,.. . . . - level.

- - ,... . . 40% C)f

- , bl pan11ftted to avoid illd preserve ~
. .--IClll,llCvfeW8•

.

and--

---abouldbeprovldld1oldf«dparhlh9;-ta.ld&amp;Hlfal ~

�MASTER PLAN

PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN
Fire: The Township has adopted a policy which will insure that there is adequate fire
protection for all parts of the Township. Future growth or development may necessitate

the addition of new equipment, facilities, manpower, or c,ntractual arrangements with
other communities.

Sewers/Water: Maximize use of existing sewer system. Discourage construction of
major new trunk lines until existing capacity is utilized.

Library: Continue participation ln the County Library System
Parks and Recreation

In order to establish a strong central focus for the community, a community center should be
created on lands in and around the Township Fire Hall and Administrative Center. Property
nt~ar the Township Hall could be utilized to allow a ten to fifteen acre focus.

The

Bowles/Mantawauka accesses will have to be redesigned to take full use of the properties.
Potential activities which could be programmed into this center might include:

0

A community library

0

A senior center

0

0

0

a

A gymnasium/auditorium complex
An Indoor/outdoor pool or Improved beach facilities
Tennis courts
Parking

Both soccer and baseball are very popular with township residents.

Yet, the only facilities

available to the community are limited. An athletic field complex consisting of two baseball
Fenton Charter Township

Page 88

�flelds. two softball fields and two aocc8f'
programs.
A bikeway/trail system

shoUld be

by means of existing roadWay&amp;

accommodate this blkeway a,8flln.
Identify the different tralL Map ti
as well as the use of tht fuue ecmllfflUIIJIIJe• .......,....., ......

..-,-..it

���This Master Plan Is 881181111accommodate future 1f1NnOand specific
will occur either with or
development and chalv,

section ldentfflea acllona

A variety of programs
Include:

�IMPLEMENTA110N
Storm Sewer Projects
Maintain existing system

Parks
o
o
o

and Recreation
Communlty/cMC center
Twenty acre softball/baseball/soccer complex
Township blkeway trail system with stgnage on existing pubHc road rtghtsot-way

Fire Service
o
Insure adequate fire protection tor the entire Township
Funding of needed capltal improvements Is alwaYS a concern.
Major county road
improvements are financed tt,rough the County Road Commission. The Township should
consider a millage eleCtlon for needed road improvements that are not high on the County's
priority list A combination County/Township collabOratlon on road improvements could stretch
local tax dollars and make improvements to deficient roads.
Sanitary and storm aewer 1mprovements are flnan08d through the creation of spocial
Improvement distrlCIS- 1l1e
County Drain Commission ls the bOndlng aul'lodty. The
Township must continue to assess . _ or mfllales to generate funds for the payment and

oenesee

operation of the sanltal'Y

8fNt8(

system.

As stated previOUIIY, fUndlnl for ~ a and civic center imp,:overnents Is nwdt men
diversified. n,e TownahiP can _ . one or any combination of sources for Its fund"ang sowe&amp;.

MIiiage, genanil

ILPII, ......... pmtall !IQll8llalll _.

generally accaptabJt ~ - - - et

Fire serv1e1 __,.....,.. . •
electlOn

~ w •IIIIIIMllll

~

IOUnda1klne

we al

fllndH10.

........ frOffl general Jund ~ r • or a 1111Uaga

.,._----would -,y •

pJO¥ided friOd1 thne

aourcea.
i'Qlhlthasbmlltmost
""81 maklaDGal 8Mt
, . . . . . ~ lnch.lta

�1)

Promoting orderly growth In a manner conallllt1t wllh land• pold• • • • •

Plan.
2)

3)

To promote attractiveness and varletY In lie T ~ __... - - • • •
providing variation In lot sizeS, ec. and allowlnG tncreased delllllas wH1e • • •:

more common open apace.
To accommodate special. complex or unique

uses llrDUfJf'I 8ldl ••111111 •

planned unit developments and speclal use pamlla.
4)

To guide development a,,ay from

ua---- ...

st.dJ •

agricultural land.
5)

To preserve and plol8Ct - accordance with the Mas181' Plan

6)

Enforce current

land

Ull8

Ulldl SUIII

zomnt ~

The zoning ordnance and offlCl8l ffllPt
long range planning pollOW Qt the TOMllfilp.
a statement of plannlnCI pollcy aid lll9 •1111111mm
policy. To adl_,. ,...........
_ _ _J_ __
to consider b

tollowll'IO.,...

•lall■

���will be extremely Important a the Townahfp
objectives contained within the Master Plan.

mcM1a

IMM

Plan Updates
This plan should not

become a static document. TIie TOlllllllfD.

attempt to re-evaluate and update portions of on
should be updated at least once evay five Y8III
goals for the review of various aactlons of 1118 Plan on

��APPENDIX A

COMIIUNITY SURVEY
QUESTIONNAIRE SUMMARY

��G)

!

i

.sa
0

C:

1u

.Q

s:.

C:

Additional apartments/townhouses/condominiums are needed

~

8-

~as~ clrcle a number below the column heading which most closely
iscribes your preference regarding each of the following statements;

G)

E

0

z

~

(46)
to/o

(129)
12%

(107}
10%

(208)
19%

(608)
55%

(331)
29%

(335)
30%

(222)
20%

(99)
9%

(137)
12%

Additional neighborhood shopping establishments such as
grocery stores, drug stores, etc., are needed . . • . . . . . . • .

(131)

(209)
18%

(109)

(259)

9%

22%

(476)
40%

Additional commercial development such as fast food, gas
station, shopping center, etc. in selected areas is needed .. .

(79)
7%

(183)

15%

(90)
8%

(230}
19%

(598)
51%

Additional industrial development is needed ..... __ ..... .

(201}

(284)
24%

(120)
10%

(135)
11%

(462)
38%

(156)
13%

(308)

8%

(467)
39%

(164)
14%

Additional senior citizen housing is needed

.. .•. •.. •. ..

~ .C - Attitudes on Commercial and

lndustrtaJ Development. If
ditional land were to become available for commercial or industrial
es, what type would you prefer? ·
11%

17%

111 D • Attitudes on Environmental Qualtty
(102)

The water quality of the Township lakes Is acceptable

26%

Q

RIiing and dredging of wetlands, swamps, and marshes should
be regulated by the Township ................••.•.

(564)
48%

(223)
19%

(70)
6%

(81)

1%

(247)
21%

)

There is overcrowding of lakes and lake properties

(855)
71%

(194}

(72)

(49)

(38)

16%

6%

4%

3%

l)

The Township should take a more active role in regulating lakes
and 1a1&lt;efront property . . . • . . . . . . • • • • • · · • • • • • • • • .

(595)
49%

(285)
24%

(121)
10%

(92)

(109)

8%

9%

l)

The Township should promote efforts to retain farming and the
rural character of the area ......•.· • , • • · · · · • • • • • • .

(739)
61%

(256)
21%

(95)
8%

(68)
6%

(48)
4%

(373)
31%

(33)
3%

(42)

(21)

61%

3%

2%

paved roads within the Township are currently adequate and
caf)able of handling existing trafffe · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · •

(99)
8%

(233)
19%

(37)

3%

(279)
23%

(560)
46%

Gf8vel roads within the Townsh!J&gt; are currently adequate and
capat,le of handling existing traffic · · · · · · · · · · · · • · · • •

(92)
8%

(280)
23%

(235)
20%

{267)
22%

(328)
27%

Township taxes sh()Uld be raised to improve roads and relieve

(64)

(121)
10%

(76)
6%

(193)

(747)
62%

'an
,Q)

!1)

~,

2.3)

•••

e . Attitudes on Township Services
Garbage and refuse collection Is satisfactory ........

'

ii

••

...

congestion •••••••.•.•.....•..••..•••••••••.
- 2 -

(746)

5%

16%

���</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008222">
                <text>Fenton-Charter-Twp_Master-Plan_1990</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008223">
                <text>Ayres, Lewis, Norris &amp; May, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008224">
                <text>1990-12</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008225">
                <text>Fenton Charter Township Master Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008226">
                <text>The Fenton Charter Township Master Plan was prepared by Ayres, Lewis, Norris &amp; May, Inc. in December 1990.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008227">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008228">
                <text>Fenton Charter Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008229">
                <text>Genesee County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008230">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008232">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008233">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008234">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008235">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038320">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54694" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58965">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/6d0a915baf8fc8ac5d92d9831410759b.pdf</src>
        <authentication>9cfe68eaec2b75407286d1f60ebd17fc</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008221">
                    <text>CITY OF FENTON, MIC

G

COMPREHENSIVE PLA
FRO ~ THE LIBRARY CW:

pi- n 113 &amp;

zn

JC

nter,

�City of Fenton, Michigan
Comprehensive Plan 1989

Prepared by the City of Fenton Planning Commission
with assistance from The WBDC Group.

Frank

ams

Kenn
E. Hanson
Ridwd&amp;al\k
Jlill'lllt11111'WIH!al

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
ELEMENT
I.

PAGE

POPULATION PROFILE
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.

II.

Historic Growth
Projections
Population Growth Scenarios
Racial Composition
Age

ECONOMIC PROFILE
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.

Employment by Industry
Employment by Occupation
Market Area Employment
Genesee County Industrial Parks
Income

III. HOUSI G PROFILE

A.
B.
C.

Housing Value
Age of Housing
Buildng Permit Data

IV. NEIGHBORHOOD PROFILE

V. TRANSPORTATION
A.
8.

C
D
E
F
G

1

Introduction
Traffic Accidents
North South Travel
Downtown Circulation
Downtown Parking
Id str al Pak Co nection
To ey Road ong L ke In I
Fre ay
Tra f V
o Pl

8
8

12
13
15
15
18
18

21
21
23
26

26
26
28
30

35

�ELEME T

v.

PAGE

TRANSPORT AT ION• con't •••
Access Management
Bike Paths
Gravel Pit Road

J.

K.
L.

VI.

39
39
39

EXISTING LAND USE
A.

Development Patterns
Image Analysis
Land Use Conflicts

8.

c.
VI I.

41

NATURAL FEATURES

51

Soils
Floodplains
Wetlands
Woodlots

51
51
53
53

A.
B.

c.
D.

VIII. HOUSING ANALYSIS

A.
B

c.
D

E
F

IX

C

A
8

41
44
48

54

Housing Conditions
Housing Mix
Housing Conversion
Hfstorfcal Homes
Hous ng or th Elderly
Future Acreage aeds
RCIAL

YSIS
e

54
55

7

5
62

�ELEME T

PAGE

x.

69

I DUSTRIAL ANALYSIS
A.
B.

c.
o.

Past Development Trends
Regional Perspective
Strengths and Weaknesses
Future Acreage Needs
COMMUNITY FACILITIES

XI.

A.
8.

c.
o.
E.
F.

Water System
Sanitary Sewer System
Capital Improvement Plan
Public Schools
Public Buildings
Parks

XII. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
ISSUES, GOALS, RECOMMENDATIONS

XIII.

A.
B.

c.
D.
E

F.
G.

XIV

xv
XVI

Transportation
Land Use
Natural Features
Housing
Connercial
Industrial
Co11111un ty Facilities
IMPLE E TATION

RECRE

ON

B BLIOGRAPHV

69
69
71

72

74
74
76
78
80
82

85

86
93

94
106

111
112

114
115
116

18

�TABLE OF TABLES

PAGE

TABLE
POPULATION GROWTH, CITY OF FENTON AND
SURROUNDING AREAS, 1950-1987

2

POPULATION ESTIMATES AND PROJECTIONS, CITY
OF FENTON AND SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES, 1987 &amp;1992

2

POPULATION PROJECTIONS, FENTON AND
SURROUNDING AREAS, TO YEAR 2010

3

4.

POPULATION GROWTH SCENARIOS, CITY OF FENTON

1

5.

POPULATION BY AGE GROUP, CITY OF FENTON, 1980

9

6.

EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY, CITY OF FENTON, 1980

11

7.

EMPLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION, CITY OF FENTON, 1980

12

8.

CIVILIAN LABOR FORCE AND EMPLOYMENT ESTIMATES,
GENESEE AND SHIAWASSEE COUNTIES (FLINT MSA)

14

INDUSTRY EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY, GENESEE AND
SHIAWASSEE COUNTIES, (FLINT MSA)

15

1.
2.

3.

9.

10. SUMMARY OF GENESEE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL PARKS, 1986
11.

HOUSEHOLD INCOME, CITY OF FENTON

16
16

12. MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME, CITY OF FENTON AND
SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES

18

13. MEDIAN HOUSING VALUE, CITY OF FENTO AND
SURROUNDING COMMUNJTIES

10

HOUSING VALUE, CITY OF FENTON, 1980

20

14

15. f(AR STRUCTUR'.£ BUilt CITY IF f!NITON

16
17.

BUILDING PERNIT DATA, CITY

If

9E- tl7

I

�TABLE OF TABLES, con't •••
TABLE

~

23.

SUMMARY OF ELDERLY POPULATION, 1987, FENTON

60

24.

PERCENT OF SENIORS NO LONGER ABLE TO LIVE
INDEPENDENTLY, 1987, FENTON

61

25.

RESIDENTIAL ACREAGE NEEDS

62

26.

EXISTING OCCUPIED RETAIL SPACE, CITY OF FENTON

64

27. COMMERCIAL ACREAGE NEEDS

68

28.

72

INDUSTRIAL ACREAGE NEEDS

�TABLE OF FIGURES
FIGURE
1.

PERCENTAGE SHARE OF POPULATION, FENTON AND
SURROUNDING Cort4UNITIES,. '80 .. 2010

2.

POPULATION PROJECTIONS TO THE YEAR 2'010,
FENTON AND SURROUND? AREA

3.

POPULATION BY AGE GROUP

4

INDUSTRY BY EMPLOYMENT SUMMARY, FLINT MSA

5

MEDIAN HOUSEHOLD INCOME, FENTON AND
SURROUNDING COMMUNITIES

I

arn

22

6

AGE OF NOUSI NG.

7.

CITY OF FENTON NEIGHBORHOODS

8

TRAFFIC ANALYSIS

9

DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC FLOW

10

EXISTING LAND US£, -,ENTON - 1917

11

IMAGE ANM.YSIS

12

NATURAL FEATURES

13

14

C

OF FEtfTOH - 1987

17

11

�•

I.

POPULATION PROFILE

A.

Historic Growth

Fenton first experienced dynamic population growth between 1860 and 1870,
when the population increased from 735 to 2,353. During the next century,
there was slow, but steady population growth. Fenton's growth rate soared
for two decades between 1950 and 1970. During those twenty years, Fenton's
population grew faster than most of the surrounding communities and Genesee
County overall.
Fenton•s population boom ceased from 1970 to 1980, as the population
decreased by 7.3 percent. Surrounding communities captured the area s
growth, during that decade, with population increases of 11.9 to 76.8
percent. Since 1980, Fenton 1 s population has increased slightly from 8,098
to 8,312 (1987 estimate).
1

Table 1 provides a comparison of growth rates for Fenton,
communities, and Genesee County between 1950 and 1987.
B.

surrounding

Projections

The 1980 U.S. Census provides the most current population benchmark for
comparing households. Effective planning, however, requires estimating the
current population and projecting into the future. Table 2 provides 1987
population estimates, and 1992 projections for Fenton, surrounding
communities, and Genesee County. This information is from National
Planning Data Corporation (NPOC), a recognized leader in preparing
small-area demographic updates and forecasts based on historic trends,
census data, and leading economic indicators.

Population projections for the Fenton area to the year 2010 have also been
prepared by regional planning commissions and the state. These projections
are shown in Table 3.

- 1 -

�Table 1
Population Growth
Cfty of Fenton and $Urrounding Areas~ ltS0-1R7
1950

CITY OF FENTON

4,226

1960

6,142

46.3 8.tM

Genesee County 270,963 374 313
Fenton Twp. ( 3) 2,153
Village of L ncten 933

4,327
1,141

Holly Twp ( 4)
1,367
Village of Holly 2,663
Rose Twp.
1,105
Jyrone Twp
1,039

2,282
3,269

r)

(l)

1,Ut

1,523

Indicates percentage g

1987 Estf 111te f
3) Fenton trownsh1
4) Holly Towns p

Source.

!L

101.0
22 8

'22' 9
8
34 t
46 Ii

�Table 3
Population Projection
Fenton and Surrounding Areas (to ,.,r 2910)

Location

1980

1990

20&amp;1

CITY OF FENTON

a.1,s

fl.Ult

11

Genesee County

450.449

441,400

Fenton Township
Village of Linden

9,510
2,174

s.,19

Holly Township

3,612
4,874
4,465

Village of Holly
Rose Township

2.1n

3,909

s.m

s.cn
1.m

4,53
s.t111
7,485

Tyrone Township
,111
&amp;,on
1 Conmunftfes 1n Ltvtngston &amp;Qaklaftd Counties hut
growth project101s between 280 aftd 2085
Source: Mt ch gan
GLS Re91
SEKCOG

Tbese project
8 840 fn the

s
Ce

!th

�Fenton Township's population is projected to nc-•~-Townshfp by 1,911 between 1980 and 2010. Pro eeted ,epultt on
Fenton and Holly Townships are
experienced between 1970 and 1980.
Figure 1 portrays each Fenton area c0R1Runity's percentage of
1980 and 2010. This figure highlights the fact that the
population base is expected to continue shifting sout-,rn
illustrates growth for the Fentoq area COhlWAities fo~ the years l
2010.
1-

�FIGUltE1
PERCENTAGE SHARE OF POPULATIO • --·• ~ii.f_l
AND SURRO
G COM..... ~,,,,. ..

�FIGURE2
POPULATION PROJECTIONS TO YEAR 2810
FENTON AND SURROUNDING AREA
1'800
15000

14000
13000

12000
11000

10080
C

00

0-.

...
N

�C

Population Growth Scenarios

Table 4 lists several population growth scenarioi tor Fent
agencies/firms using a variety of accepted projection method$
for comparison in identifying and quantifying future growth
informational purposes. the projections have bee~ averaged.
Table 4

Population Growth Scenarios
City of Fenton

A

B

C

D

E

1980

8,098

B.098

8,098

8 098

8,098

1987

8.312

NA

8,871

1,183

a.588

1992

8,407

NA

9.423

s.4t5

8,752

2000

NA

8,729

10 327

201-0

NA

B 840

11 411

Sou ce.
Scenario A:

Mat1Ma1 Plann ng

SGeu

G

1t

Q

8

�This plan will use the projections contained in Scenario E in considering
Fenton's future growth. Scenario E most closely represents the mid-range of the
various growth options.

o.

Racial Composition

The 1980 population in the City of Fenton was 99.1 percent white. Less than 1
percent of the populus were minority residents. The hispanic population
comprised .5 percent of the population.
E.

Age

Table 5 provides a breakdown of the Fenton population by age group. This
breakdown is also shown graphically in Figure 3.
Fenton, with 33.7 percent of its population in the 0-19 year old age group 1s
very similar to the state (33.6 percent). In the.20-64 age group Fenton (54.7
percent) is slightly lower than the state (56.6 percent). Fenton exceeds the
state's percentage of elderly population (65 years and over) with 11.6 percent
compared to the state's 9.8 percent. If Fenton follows the same pattern as
projected for the state through 2010, it will decline in percentage terms for
the 0-19 age group, and increase in both the 20-64, and 65 and over age groups.

II. ECONOMIC PROFILE
A. Employment by Industry
Employment by industry lists the workforce employed by sectors of t
economy, such as manufacturing, retail trade or education The Fento
fs similar to Genesee County and the state of Mich19lfl in
percentage (31 8 percent) of l:he peop e ire emp1eyetl

n th•

industry
Th-is compar•s to 39 8 percent o the Gent$• Cou
30 3 percent of the Michig1n workforce

�The service industry ranks a close second, employing 31.1 percent of the
workforce.
Service industry employment is higher than either the county or the
state, which employ 26.1 and 28.4 percent respectively.

Table 5
Population by Age Group
City of Fenton, 1980

Total Persons

A9e
Under 5 years
5 to 9 years
10 to 14 years
15 to 19 years
20 to 24 years
25 to 29 years
30 to 34 yea rs
35 to 39 yea rs
40 to 44 yea rs
45 to 49 years
50 to 54 yea rs
55 to 59 yea rs
60 to 64 years
65 to 69 years
70 to 74 years
75 years and over
.Median Age

# Minorit~

569
639
705
814
743
705
582
482
410
437
418
382
275
249
205
483

559
633
695
801
735
700
576
475
407
436
418
381
275
248
204
479

10
6
10
13

29.1

29.2

NA

* Minority includes Black, Hispanic, Other
NA - information not available
Source:

# White

U.S. Census Bureau

- 9 -

8

5
6

7
3

1
1
1
1

4

�FIGURE3
POPULATI
CITYO

BYAGEGROVP
0 .1•

�Wholesale/retail is also a strong employment industry for Fenton employing 22.5
percent of the workforce; this is higher than the county (19.4 percent), and the
state (20.1 percent).
A complete breakdown of employment by industry for the Fenton workforce fs given
in Table 6.
Table 6
Employment by Industry
City of Fenton, 1980
City of Fenton
Type of Business

i of Total Workforce*
# Employed
Fenton

Agriculture
4
Mining
7
Construction
147
Manufacturing
1,051
Transportation
106
Co1T111unications/Public
Utilities
50
Wholesale Trade
155
Retail Trade
587
Finance, Insurance, Real
Estate
110
Business and Repair Svc.
100
Personal. entertainment,
and Recreation Svc.
122
Professional and Related Svc. 806
Mealth
243
Educational

Public Administration

*
"

0.1
0.2
4.5
31.8
3.2

Genesee Co. Michigan
0.5

o.o
3.2
39.8
4.0**

1.5
4.7
17.8

16.5

3.3
3.0

4.2
3 1

4 '
3 S

3 7

2 7

24.4

20 3

34
21&amp;5

17

2 7

20 1***

454

56

1.7
0.4
4.1
30.3
5.7

Represent eo,nparfson of Fenton brea down to Coml
CodbfAes Trans ortation wt h Ccnnun ca 181\

�B. Employment by Occupation
Employment by occupation gives job characteristics for employees in the various
employment sectors. "Managerial and professional specialty occupations", and
"technical sales and administrative support" are the first and second highest
occupations of employment in Fenton with 26.8 and 23.8 percent respectively.
·As would be expected, due to the large percentage of the workforce 1n the
manufacturing industry, 19.1 percent of the workforce is employed fn
industry-oriented occupations such as operators, laborers, and assemblers.
However, since the above percentage is lower than the total 31.8 percent
employed in the manufacturing industry, many Fenton residents are employed fn a
managerial or technical sales capacity within the manufacturing sector.
A complete breakdown of employment by occupation is listed in Table 7.
Table 7
Employment by Occupation
City of Fenton, 1980
OCCUPATION
Employed persons 16 yrs. and over

I EMPLOYED

3,301

Managerial and professional specialty
Executive, administrative, managerial
Professional specialty

884

Technical sales and administrative support
Technicians and related support

786

Sales

Administrative support including clerfca1
service
Private household
Protective Service
A11 Other Service
fanning forestry, filsMfll

Precision production craf and fepa r

314

570

55

257

474
465

26

2
7

2

PERCENT

100 o
26 8

�c.

Market Area Employment

Market area employment trends tre a lead1ng
economic development out1ook ty"takfng tnt
provide a more accurate econ01111c picture thatl ju
residents. The City of Fenton 1$ located within tJ'tt fl Rt --~11:at
Fenton workforce could be working 1n Fenton or e1sewhere wt h
Similarly, many persons working or shopping in fentoa re de
Table 8 provides a 1980 and 1987 breakdollJl'I of
1•yn1Utl
Flint market area, which includes the counties of Geflessee 1
Table 8 indicates that the Flint area has ~nd•~•
workforcf between 1980 and 1987. Tbs decline has
the manuf•cturfng industry which lost nearly 13,000
service producing industries e,cperienced s11ght p ft
Wholesale and ret•11 ~ftdustrfes ncrused ~
wr,tk'l\llWll',I~•
5,000. General ser ice fndustrits p Md 2 200 du
t

Table 9 givas an emp o,ment
MetrDpoltt
Area
industry

�Ta.ble 8

C1v111an Labor Force a'ftd D_aplo.YIN'Qt Estffll es.
Genesee and Shiawas:see. Clut1t1e1 rr1t,tt
t.epol
1980 and 1987

CIYILIAN I.MGR FORCE
Elllplo.v-nt

unemplo.ymenrt
Ra1:e-

Nin1ng
Const~uct1on
Mamifae urt119

Durable Goods

Furniture and Fixtures
Lumber and Mood PrGdu:cts

!DO

�Table 9

Industry Employment Summary
Genessee and Shiawassee Counties
(Flint Metropolitan Stattstfc:a1 Aru. 1180 ..lftf1911l

Construction and Mfnfng
Manufacturing

s.100

4

70.400

S'1 HO

Trans. C0111111 1 &amp;ut111tfes

&amp;.200

4 AO

Wholesale Trade

9 200

H,100

30.700

33 ,VO

Retail Trade
Finance. Ins. Real Estate
Services
Government
Total Wage and Salary E,ftP
Note

Source.

tndllstr

�Table 10
Summary of Genessee County Industrial Parks, 1986
Park
1.

2.
3.
4.

s.

6.
7.

a.

9.

10.
11.

Name
Agree
Bishop
C11o
Commerce
Dort-Carpenter
Fenton US-23
Fenway Park
Hil 1/I-75
Holiday
Montrose
St. John

Total
Acres

Acres

Vacancy

Avail.

Ratd

43

30
15

30I

50
27

57
104
170
40
30

tOI

16
36
95

3ft

40

91S
231

14

351

50

21
29

37

37

180

701

22

73'

581
10M

12S

Source: News Report, Flint-Genesee Corporation for £eonmric Gn&gt;wth. Mey--. 1987
Table 11
Household Income
City of Fenton

Less than $7,500
$ 7,500 - $14.999

$15,000
20,000
$25,000
$30,000
$3

-

19,999

$24,999
$29 991
$34 999

16

15 S

�FIGURE4
I DUSTRY EMPLO

�Table 12
Median Household Income
City of Fenton and Surrounding Communities
Location

1979

1987

1992

CITY OF FENTON
Genesee County

$20.410
$20,996

$27,339
$27,580

$29,355
$30,500

·Fenton Twp.
Village of Linden

$26,360
$22,339

$31,032
$29,545

$34,247

Holly Twp.
Village of Holly
Rose Twp.
Tyrone Twp.

$22,279
$21,327
$26,193
$29,034

$27,179
$25,694
$32,086
$38,333

$28,888

$32,869

$27.237
$35,146
$43,143

Source: 1979 figures - U.S. Census Bureau
1987 estimate and 1992 projection - Nationa1 Planning Data Corporation

III. HOUSING PROFILE
A. Housing value.
The City of Fenton 1ncreaud by 486 heu; if
Despite a considerable number M lalcefront bas
housing units 1n 1980 we
Qccup ed ear....rltbndl-..
accounted for 75 2% of be tot.al nu11•r· ,occ:t11dilllJIIIIII

of

lower tha
ownsh1Jl)I

Fen on

�••

·····-

11

..,, a:

MEDIAN INCOME
~

0

w

C

;:,c

0

n

(fl

(I}

~

I\)

0

0

0
0
0

(fl

t.:&gt;
0

0
0
0

0
0
0

~

ff;.
0

U1
0

0
0

0
0

0

0

7.

~
0

CITY OF FENTON

z

C: tt'l
:;a:, :i::

GENESEE COUNfY

-:,

r-

i7

~o
0 t"'4

C: t::,

FENTON TWP.

C)

~~

0

"'

zzM
zo
t::, C:
r:,, 00

r►

0
::,:,

Z C C'l
C:
O&gt;:;:i::,
loo"j ~

&gt; ::C Ul

IT1

~
&gt;
n

"'?j

trj trj -

1-((i
t""

0

zo

a:

VILLAGE OF LINDEN

C")
(i tfj

(i

&gt;

0

--i
~

0

z

~
~
C:

HOLLY TWP.

~

VILLAGE OF HOLLY

~

r:,,

ROSE TWP.

TYRONE TWP.

$43134

(§I
~

\0

\0
N
,-._

"'C
~

0
~
.._,

■
1-4

\0

010
......
ti,
t:.,J

-"".l
.._,

.

�Table 13
Median Housing Value
City of Fenton and Surrounding Communities, 1980 and 1988
1980
Value

1988
Value 1

CITY OF FENToN

$42,300

61,513

Genesee County

$35,500

51,624

Fenton Twp.
Village of Linden

$56,600

82,309

Location

Holly Twp.
$41,400
Village of Holly
$38,300
Rose Twp.
$59,700
Tyrone Twp.
$66,400
1 Represents 1980 value adjusted to 1988
urban consumers.
Source:

60,204
55,696
86,816
96,560
using the Consumer Price Index for all

The U.S. Census Bureau and The WBOC Group

Considering only owner occupied, single family homes on less than 10 acres
(the classification applied by the Census Bureau in delineating value),
Table 14 details 1980 Fenton housing values.
Table 14
Housing Value, City of Fenton,1980
# of Units

Value
Less than $10,000
$10,000 to $19,999
$20,000 to $29,999
$30,000 to $49,999
$50,000 to $99,999
$100,000 to $149,999
$150,000 to $199,999
$200,000 or more

9

56
245
923
503
40

9
l

Median Value:

source.

Us. Census

$42,300
Bureau

�B. Age of Housing
Table 15 gives a breakdown of housing age. Fenton's long tenn dee
city has produced housing in a variety of age groups As ftnt&amp;n &amp; tmu
continues to age, the city may have to establish a hQWsing ,...a•~
program should evidence of deterioration occur. Fenton present y
1,200 housing units 39 years or older Figure 6 gr1ph1ca11y f11u$trate&amp;
housing stock.
Table 15
Year Structure Built
City of Fenton
Year Built
1980 to 1987

1979
1975
1970
1960

to
to
to
to
1950 to
1940 to
1939 or

Mar 1980
1978
1974
1969
1959

1949
earlier

TOTAL. HOUSING YNITS

C

Bu ld1n

U..its

Percent

315

9.9

40
263
287

408
161

Ht
8'8

1.3
8.3
9 I

12 9
21.1
10.4
27 1
100 0

�FIGURE 6
AGE OF HOUSING
CITY OF FE TO -1987

HOUSING
U ITS
1-9YRS
1O- l 8YRS
19-38YRS
39 YRS&lt;

355
550
1077
1187

3169

SOURCE·
U.S. CENSUS BUREAU. CITY OF FENTO

�Table 16

Building Penn1t Data

City of Fenton
1980 ... 1987
Year

ny

1980
1981

12

1982
1983

7
7
6

1984

4

1985
1986

32
45

85

1987
TOTAL

e

Fam l I

198 (52 9)

t

5
0
0
2
12
48
418

117 (31 3)

source· 1980-1984 Data - Genesee Count, P
1985-1987 Data - City of Fenton

IV

N!IGlifBORMOOD PROnLE

The C ty of Fertt
p

�Table 17
Population, Housing and JnCOIIII ~ltt.Ncte
By Neighborhood
City of Fenton, 1980

Ne1 hborhood

1980
1980 Housing
units
Po

n

064

772
(4)

267
{5)

{4)

065

1806

104

23CJ
(t)

1968

655

Rank 1-10
Rank 1-10

066

Renk 1-10

(2)

( 1)

216

1)

(t)

73

067
Rank 1-10

(9)

(9)

068

370
(8)

139

Rank 1-10

(8)

�UJ&lt;£..,,....,..

_rrl
--~-

FIGURE 7

CITY OF FENTON

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FENTON, MICHIGAN

NEIGHBORHOODS
(AS DELINEATED FOR THE NEIGHBORHOOD STATISTICS PROGRAM&gt;

.

.. ... -

i..ri......J

�V

TRANSPORTATION

A

Introduction

Fenton's transportation ys • bes an inrportaht
in shaping the City's uture growth. Correcttfllg
w111 enable Fenton to meft
continues to grow
The Traffic Analysis MIP (Figure 8) pPov1des naiiilli'll't t intr&amp;fflilftiillil
accident 1oe~tf ons, iltte see:t1cm -whtc.fll arw eMfu
•
areas where act1,1t1 fra ,cttia
tlfld
1ft I s 'IMl!r•IWll1,.. lllllftkt'
along the street, daily traffic
capacities, and ,,eas where• new st
conditions, and recOtm1tod1tfons teb ~ s
detail fn the fGllowfrng sections

B

Jraff1c Accidents

��Action Alternatives:
Improvements to reduce accidents at spec1f1c fnterseeitm . .,11111~·-~·...a1r
detailed evaluation of accident patterns, signal tiMing etG
analysis of traffic issues which follows addresses tk fllWd
traffic operations at most of the interseet1ons lfsted lbove.
C North - South Travel
There are two major north - south routes through F
Streets. Both are two lane roadways carrpng
vehicles per day along various segment$. Eacft
characteristics that fnfluenee their
lfned with single family res1dent1,1 h
primarily by through traffic. Leroy
often with limited setbaeks which adds siff fie.ant y
volume when added to the tbr9ugh traffic

Many JDOtorJsts use Adelaide for lon
of the access1bi1fty to tbe US. 2
compared to Leroy Str•t
u,1r,9 L•ro, Street for lo
tbe circuiito
patt
C
re

�four 90 degree turns required and traffic congestion llt.rth
Square. Also, current traffic volumes on Nortb LerQY
iie.eft
intersection with North Road and the downtotffl are approadt 9 e11.aCill'\,}tl
a two lane street

Action Alternatives:
North - south through travel routes in Fenton need to ~
acconmodate both existing and future traffic volumes &lt;•ro,• eM:
the downtown are addressed in a later section of this p1u)
Leroy along its two lane segment ts one option. However. the dart
adjacent land uses along the street 1im1ts tie J)Otelit1al
Adelaide Street has sufficient capacity to handle lddi
adjacent land uses are sufficiently setback to allow flJtu
Therefore, for planning purposes Ade1afde Street stlotl1d be
primary through north-south route in Fenton for t~
oriented to the downtown Leroy Street shou d be ¥1 d l
to adjacent land uses such as Fent111 Square ob
nearby homes

Several re1at1 ely no fi111p
in,prove traffic flow
1_per1t1 sat Ille

s ltG

�D.

Downtown Circulation:

Streets in downtown Fenton
motorists patronizing businesses. The generalized ,e
based on intersection turning movements fs shown in Figqre 9
and turning movement counts were also used to esti•te tbe
travel patterns in the downtown area, as shown 1n the followfng tab :e
Table 19
Downtown Travel Patterns
City of Fenton
Movement
1.
2.

3.
4.
5
6.

1.

a.
g

N. Leroy to/f Offl S11ffr l e Rd./Roberti
N. Leroy to - from "'-in St

To/from Fenton Square (n. etwtrance}
Silver Lake Rd - Roberts to/~Nllft Main
N. Leroy to/from s. Leroy
Silver Lake Rd - Roberts to/fr• E. Roflerts
S Leroy to Main St.
Silver Lake Rd - Roberts to/fr
Other

$(1)urce:

�FIGURE 9

CITY OF FENTON DOWNTOWN TRAFFIC FLOW
(NUMBERS BASED ON PEAK

HOUR TRAFFIC COUNTm

••
SILVER LAKE
8750

�•
•
•
•

•

Earlier studies by a traffic engineering firm and the Genesee County
Planning Department recommended a partial one-way system around Fenton
Square.
Both of the previous recommendations were to make Walnut Street
one-way northbound and South Leroy Street between Silver lake Road and the
Community Center one-way southbound. Those studies were based on downtown
traffic
volumes which were much higher than are currently being
experienced.
The studies also included other design recommendations
intended to improve circulation in and around the mall.
Few of those
recommendations have been implemented.
Action Alternatives:
Three alternatives were considered to improve traffic flow:
ALTERNATIVE A - ONE WAY SYSTEM
This alternative would require traffic around Fenton Square to use Ellen to
Wa1nut for northbound and South Leroy for southbound travel. As noted
above, the one-way system was recommended in two previous studies. Cost of
the project would be minimal, requ1r1ng only signage and intersection
modifications along South Leroy Street at Ellen and the south Fenton Square
entrance. The intersection modifications could include brick pavers across
the street to emphasize Ellen to Walnut for northbound traffic.
This alternative improves northbound travel by eliminating the difficult
movement from South Leroy Street to Roberts Road to North Leroy Street.
However, the alternative of using Walnut is already available though seldom
used.
In spite of the general perception to the contrary, Leroy Street is
not currently used as the major north-south route through Fenton, and
should not be. Rather, Adelaide Street provides a more appropriate route
for through traffic, and is currently being used in this manner.
In addition, the one-way system does little to improve those movements
causing congestion, such as Silver Lake/Roberts Road to/from Leroy Street
and to/from Main Street.

- 32 -

�ALTERNATIVE B RECONNECT LEROY STREET
This alternative would reconnect the North/South Leroy Stri
existing Fenton Square. and more specifically. Dancers Sto.r.e
would improve traffic operations at the Silve~ Like Road ar,d Le
intersection but could also have undesirable impacts.
Since travel downtown would be less congested. some of the thNHJ1t11111
currently using Adelaide would probably shift to Leroy That woutl.d
traffic conditions north of the downtown where the potenttol fer w
1s restricted. This alternative also does little to fapl:"OVe the
traffic flows. such as between Silver Lake/Roberts Road and 1ft s•--...,.
In addition. the relocation of the Dancers Store would be costly
This alternative could also have a significant adverse tmpact on
Square by increasing fragmentation of th• Squa~•s
Implementation of this alternative would require art O~--~t ef
the Square. and would likely neeessitate some restlui~ to M1 1~r-M • d •
impacts

•••••1.-

1

ALTERNATIVE C CONNECTING SILVER UK£ ROAi

TI)

HAI

This alternative would include exteftd ng S lver
railroad tracks to co11ect
Me•,~~Mafn to
Ile

�Alternative C would reduce left turns fNJIII
Leroy Street by approximately one-third, ancf-¥
from Main Street onto North Leroy Street. llJU&amp; te t
traffic. an exclusive left turn phase !for eastbtt,,nd Sf1H
required. The result would be improved traffic oper
intersections.
Traffic operations could be fiurther improved if tllte nter·~••lj!•
Leroy Street at Silver Lake Road could be den.ed to lllflfln~•
lane for westbound traffic. A one sfdecl traffic s.tpa;l s
traffic only; or a signal timed to coordfntte w tft 'the
could be considered to malte left tu.ms f
-■,- te• ._N!llbtaMIIIII
Both of these reconnendatfons were made previously by tbe
Planning Department

Implementation of Alternative
ra11roed crossing and requ1reMettt for nwttreet
the project would be much mo
than optfcm B Since the t
crossings by reducing veh1'1
tood pat• tial f
e t:ate

�The southern entrance off Leroy Street is perceived by the untrained
motorist as a continuation of the street. There are no visual features to
highlight the entrance. The southern entrance has been a particular
problem with large trucks entering the parking lot and lacking sufficient
maneuvering space to easily exit the lot.
Each entrance to the Square provides access to only one of the sevetal
parking areas. The lack of connection points between the parking areas
forces motorists to re-enter the surrounding street system if unable to
find a parking space or to visit another store during inclement weather.
This situation creates conflicts with traffic using Leroy as a through
north-south route. Moreover, the segregated parking arrangement reduces
the potential for shoppers to patronize businesses at opposite ends of the
Square.
F.

Industrial Park Connection:

Fenton's two major industrial parks, Fenway and Fenton, are located just
east of U.S. 23. Though adjacent to one another, the two parks have
separate access systems, though a connection is desirable and feasible.
Fenway Park's entrance is along Silver Lake Road, which provides convenient
access to U.S. 23. Fenton Park is south of Fenway and has three tcce
points along Owen Road: at Alloy Drive, Industrial Drive and Steel Dr1
Those three routes provide access to the OWen Road/US 23 inter:cblRge
Alloy Drive is closest to the interchange, but has 'the least sig,tt
(12 to 15 seconds) looking to the west Industrt 1 Drift 1
park's main entrance but fs obscured by the conaeN:fal uses
sfgnage on either side Steel Drive fs the lftOSt visible and ffilnd,1,

the three ae~ess points

However

and is aef'iOss f OM oane~ta, rdri e

Due to the lack of• north~
tfflt two NUS M4 parts
VS 2

r:ed ov

he

�In addition to the desirability to connect the two fndustl"ial pe
is a need for a north-south connector fer intra-city tr1,eJ. SCllll■WI
between U.S. 23 and Adelaide. Environmental conditfons 11nrf the Dlld:e1'1l!t1
alignments of such a connector. Nuch of the area east of fie:
parks contains poor soils that would have to be reptac t• • 1
construction. An extension of either Alloy Drive or tei
complicated by the crossing of an identified wetland. tldwe er, e
this constraint into consideration, the short length l!'tefU Nd
Alloy Drive and the existence of public right-of-way make tt a
project.
Extending Steel Drive could also provide the connect on
1ndustr1a1 parks and serve as a connector route between
•
Owen Roads. Steel Drive has the most potential for as tnatttre en,YN~
provides the most direct connection,
between Adelaide and U.S. 23.
G.

Torrey Road/Long Lake Road Interseetfen

Several elements make tWe ffltersectfon of Leg take
difficult for moto 1st~ to travel through llest:botnid
Lake Road have sotne probl•s retctiftg to the relit
northbound traffic, as Mhicles on Torrey load
keep pace with parallel triaff
IS
traffic are al•a a

�H.

Freeway Access:

Fenton is fortunate to have three U.S. 23 interchanges wit a ttte
limits. The convenience of the freeway increases the desirabflity
value of the industrial and commercial land. Freeway avaf1ab11fty prov1dlts
Fenton residents wfth accessibility to employment opportunttfes within
region and. conversely, affords residents outside of Fenton easy a e
jobs and businesses in the City.
However, there are operational problems wfth tbe OWen Road i
which create an uncomfortable and potentially h•zardous s tuatio~
Owen Road bridge over U.S. 23 fs narrow and bas a steep crown wt'lictl
sight distance for motorists using the ramps. TIie sight distance ,r·C)b:l,eatt.a
may be contributing to the relatively high number of accidents occurr ng a
the fnnnediate vicinity. The Michigan Department of Transportation
11 ~e
installing a traffic signal at the ramp tenninal to help relieve t e
problems. The new traffic signal will improve safety but a long ran99
improvements such as widening the bridge to four lanes a•d reconst~
of the bridge with better ramp separation are needed. The n
--~--improvements will become greater as development occurs west of u.

I

Traffic Volume to Capacity latfos.

Traffic capacity problems•
heurs of activity at etch 1n

add

�when traffic volumes exceed this capacity motor sts ~ enc. ttedth"
delays. reduced speed and maneuverability, and an increased ~ a
accidents. Generally when volumes are over 25 to 5GI of
capacity congestion becomes severe and improvements or all'D!fi"illflt~t11111
should be considered).
Comparisons between current averege daily traftic m1ames .a
desired capacities ar,e shown below and in F1~ B l1M'! table
two street segments which are current1y carryir:19 YOllllleS gN!IWtw
are designed to handle without experiencing som cOllgestf on
Street between North Road and First/Main Street and 2) O..n
Jennings to West Shiawassee. The remaining six segm,ents 1n the tale
have volumes approaching or exceeding generaltzed C:IQtat
timeframe of this study, depemttng Ofll:" tk pha ~
development in and around Fenton

Table 20
Volume to Capacity Ratios

Strut
Leroy

COIOG

�J.

Access Maftagement.

Major streets in Fenton. such as Silver 1
to 11Gve traffic Access to ad]acent lind uses,. td'n!t'IIW
residential. 1s en 1111,ortallt second:ary an111"11"'1Pft11l
1

of each driveway d1ntf~fsh the streets ca:pac ty
Careful planning of the number. location and desfp of dr11¥e1•t·
preserve the capacity of tie street. ffrts
protect the pubHc 1Mestment in the street
costly widenings or other 1mprov1111tt11ts.

-~1:-

There are examp 1es of l&gt;oth good •nd bad access un1g,B111NJ111.·

OWen Road the number and spacing of dr1¥eW.an
control 1ed

The 1ack of access ma11a9ertelft a lent 11a1.ar,
the congestion and accidents e~per enced t1ont tbat ,_.._

K

Bike Paths.

fo:r en
Biqc

�Gravel Pit Road presently provides the only good access for the land south
of West Shiawassee to the city limits. Existing development has greatly
limited opportunities for an alternative north-south access road in this
area. The road is paved but is in poor condition. The distance the road
is offset from Steel Drive at Owen Road is not ideal but could not be
realigned without the elimination of high school ball fields to the east.
We recommend that the city pursue dedication of the road to the city to
provide future access for residential development.

�VI

EXISTING LAND USE

A Development Patterns

The last detailed land use ana1Js1s c-oGducted prto
the 1975 Fenton Master Plan for Lar:ld Use. TIN! hi
that plan was conducted in larch rf l9r14 A ltedtMffl
contained 1n each land use category from the 1974
Table 21.
Existing land use for the City was updated for lh1s p1aa
and is shown in Figure 10
A bre1k...,_ &amp;J·-ac:MIHle
category and percentage of developed and bl"« 1 ncl 1
The percentage figures of total laAd froiu, the 1974 SdNef
for comparison purposes

0Yera 11 growth during the l &amp;st 13
There has been

llllilJ"li..._,

�occurring at the Owen Road/US-23 interchange
•

The number of homes in the Silver Lake SubdiY1si

In sunnary, approximately 427 acres were developed during tile
period for an increase 1n developed land of 26 5 percent. This deve e
rate represents an average annual growth rate for the per od
percent.
Table 21
Existing Land Use Acreages
City of Fenton. 1974

Land Use

Acres

Residential
One Family
Two Family
Mul t 1 Fam11 y

581.1

Business

115.8

2.7

91.8

2.1

i35 1

54

Industrial
Public

Schools
Buildings
Open Sf)ace
Parks

Quasi Publ c.

Churches I

OAS

1 of Total

552.7
10.6

13.3
12 7

It

84

17.8

51.J

72

��Table 22
Existing Land Use Acreages
C1ty of Fertton, October, 1987
Ac-res

Oct 1987

I Developed 1 o'f T««1
Land
Oct 1187

Single Family
Multiple Fam1ly 2
Colllnercial
Office
Gen Retail

156.29

Public

200.8

99

4.1

Quasi-Public
Iftdustri al

70.5
105.4

35

S2

1'
2 2

R1ghts of Way
(RR &amp;Streets}

657 8

32 3

15 1t

758.8

37 2

64 4
179.4

3.2

Z3.07-

Undeveloped
Water

2105 6

TOTAL ACRES

4353 6

1
2.

8 8

11 4
1S
41

210.9

---

I
I !

48 3

4.1

J

�A visual image analysis for the City of Fenton was conducted to help
analyze identified issues and provide a foundation for land use policies.
Specifically, Fenton's major image assets were identified so that they
could be maintained or enhanced in the future; and the City's major visual
problems were identified so that recommendations could be developed to
reduce or eliminate their negative influence. The analysis is strongly
oriented to main travel routes since they are the areas where the strongest
impressions are formed. The following narrative description correlates
with the information found on the "Image Analysis Map" (Figure 11).

Main Street Corridor:
•

The transition from agricultural to residential uses creates a pleasant
entry from the east.

•

The lumber yard has a negative visual impact on Main Street and also
the Central Business District.

Owen Road Corridor:
•

The Fenton High School athletic fields have the effect of reducing the
number of driveways along this corridor while producing positive visual
character.

•

Effective implementation of zoning controls, fer setback dr1Y
spacing, and landscaping. have resulted 1ft a pl
impression.

~est Shiawassee Corridor:

al,,.. with utstand
1~t~e~~-

�.

POTeNTIAL
RECREATION AREA

POSITIVI! ENTRY ZONES CIWIACT11R
NEGATNE l!NTRY ZONE CKARACTIR

FIGURE 11

POSITIVI CITY FOCAL POINT

CITY OF FENTON

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FENTON, MICHIGAN

( EXISTING

LAND USE)

NEGATIVE CITY FOCAL POINT
POSITI\I£ STAE£TIICAPI CHARAC1'ER

NEGATM: STRUTIICAPE CHARACflll
ltlSTORIC RIISOURCI!
NAT\IRAL RESOUIICII

PRIMARY VISUAL l!DGII

.J,ISilJL
INILll'AIII.Y

1111.11'1.1 Ml&amp;Y

CGlllallCIAL

■

CIMCII

LAND UIIIMIUAL CCMIJCf
PUILIC

··--·- ·QUAIH'lalC/liSfflll'n0tW,.

IIOll8TlaAI.

UICEVl&amp;.QIIID

�North Leroy Corridor:
•

Inadequate parking lot screening, poor signage, and high
visibility create and unattractive streetscape.

utility line

North Leroy/CBD Corridor:
•

Poor land use transition from commercial to residential uses has
resulted in an undefined image for the area. Commercial uses have
encroached into single family areas as they have expanded from the
Central Business District.

•

Poor streetscape character detracts from the

visual

quality of the

area.
•

The close proximity of buildings and exposed
roadway creates visual clutter and confusion.

parking lots to the

Silver Lake Road Corridor:
•

Silver Lake/Poplar intersection creates no "sense of entry

11

into the

city.
•

Residential

uses along Silver Lake Road generally reinforce a positive

image.
Central Business District (CBO):
•

Fenton Square is not effective as a town center focal point Poor s te
design, circulation, and access contribute to a unattractive and
non-cohesive image which negates many of the positive aspects of
adjacent buildings and spaces.

•

The government center area has many fine features including the gazebo,
Mill Pond government complex, churches, and other architectura ly
significant structures, which make 1t a very positive focal point for

the City.

- 47 -

�Dibbleville:
•

This two block commercial district, which was part of Fenton's original
business district, adds a unique character and architectural interest
to the city. Dibbleville is registered as a Michigan Historic Site.

Mill Pond and Shiawassee River:
•

A primary natural resource that has great potential
recreational resource throughout the community.

C.

Land Use Conflicts

as a visual

and

There are several land use conflicts within the community (Figure 11).
Each of these conflicts are addressed below·, with recommendations
following.
Expanded Plastics:
Expanded Plastics represents the most severe case of land use
incompatibility in Fenton. The negative impacts presented by the facility
are caused by several factors, which are listed below:
•

As an industrial use, it is incompatible with the adjoining retail
governmental, and residential uses.

•

The building is unattractive and detracts from the aesthetic quality of
the area.
It lacks sufficient

room for landscaping

-

The site 1s overbuilt.
parking and loading.

•

Trucks and truck trailers serving the company obstruct traffic movement
and routinely park within street right-of-ways.
- 48 -

�Valley Lumber:
Valley Lumber, located on Main Street next to the Michigan Bean Company,
lies at the eastern entry into the CBO. As a heavy cof!ITlercial use, the
first impression created by the lumberyard is inconsistent with the retail
character of the CBO.
Machine Tool &amp;Gear and Industrial Training Center:
These industrial uses are located on the northern edge of the CBD, on North
Leroy near Second. They negatively impact the conrnercial image in a
transition area from the Fenton Square retail core to the strip commercial
extending along North Leroy.
Best Self Storage:
The Best mini-storage is located west of North Leroy and south of Trelout.
The location between two multiple family developments results in land use
incompatibility.
Plastics Research:
Plastics Research creates a negative entry image into the Bush Community
Park. The negative image is the result of unscreened storage of materials
and truck trailers in close proximity to Jefferson Street. The east side of
the building, which is unattractive, is unscreened and in full view from
the park. As an industrial use, Plastics Research is also incompatible
with the adjacent school, park, and surrounding residential homes.
Gerych's Greenhouse:
Gerych's is located on Silver Lake Road between the CBD and U.S 23
As a
commercial business, it receives good exposure on a major traffic route.
however, land use conflict exists because it is located in a residential
area. The existing residential character along ilver Lake Road should be
maintained in this area Additional commercial development will create a
confusing image for both use types

- 49 •

�Creative Foam:
Creative Foam is an isolated industrial use located on Beach Street north
of the railroad tracks. Land use incompatibility exists, because three
sides of the building are adjacent to single family homes and a medical
facility.
Fenton Cinema:
The Fenton Cinema presents a land use conflict by its location within the
Fenway Industrial Park. Introduction of additional commercial uses in this
industrial area will undermine the integrity and image of the park.
Summary:
As short term solutions, we recommend that identified land use conflicts be
minimized through implementation of the following on-site improvements or
actions:
•
•
•

enforce existing City ordinances
eliminate uncontrolled parking of vehicles or storage of materials
encourage businesses to increase use of buffering/screening techniques

It is also recommended that the Expanded Plastics facility be relocated at
the earliest possible time. The severity of its impacts and its high
visibility within the CBD make this action necessary.
Long term recommendations are that the above listed land use conflicts be
either contained, transferred into more compatible uses, or eliminated.
Zoning restrictions should be developed to help in achieving this goal.

- 50 -

�VII.

FENTON NATURAL FEATURES

An evaluation was conducted in Fenton for soils, floodplains, wetlands, and
wood lots. Each of these natural features is discussed below and
illustrated in Figure 12.
A.

Soils

An evaluation of soil types for all undeveloped land in Fenton was
conducted to determine development limitations. The rating of each soil
type was based on information contained in the Genesee County Soil Survey
published in April, 1972. This survey was compiled by the United States
Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service with field work being
performed during the years 1962 to 1966.
All soil types were classified as having either slight to moderate
development limitations or severe development limitations.
Soils
identified as having severe limitations had some combination of the
following characteristics:
•
•
•
•

Flooding
Ponding
Low bearing strength
High shrink-swell potential

•
•
•
•

Unstable organic material
High frost heaving
High water table
Steep slopes (121 or greater)

These soils are identified as poor soils on the Natural Features Map. A
site having a soil type rated as having severe limitations does not
necessarily mean that it cannot be developed, but rather that on
site-testing of the soil, or some site alteration may be required
.Development on these soil types typically involves a higher cost of
construction.

B. Floodplains
Land areas located within the 100 year floodplain, as detennined by th
Federal Emergency Management Agency, are shown in Figure 12 Floodp1a1n
areas as shown are approximate and the official flood insurance rate caap
shou1d be referred to for 1nsuraAce purposes A 100 year floodp1a1 1

- 51 •

�FIGURE 12

CITY OF FENTON

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FENTON, MICHIGAN

[

NATURAL FEATURES

)

J.IIIIIL
•

1IO YIM l'QOD ,LMI

----....--·
------··---

Wfll.AND9

...

wooauns

�defined as an area within which there is a 1 percent chance in any year of
a 100 year flood occurring. Floodplains serve as water recharge areas and
natura1 water retention basins during periods of heavy precipitation or
Spring snow thaws. Development with the 100 year floodplain should be
discouraged.
C.

Wetlands

Wetlands were determined by the U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and
Wildlife Service through interpretation of high altitude aerial photographs
(aerial photography date: October 1978).
A wetland means 1and characterized by the presence of water at a frequency
and duration sufficient to support, and that under norma1 circumstances
does support, wet1and vegetation or aquatic life. Wetlands serve several
important natural functions including:
• Flood and storm contro1
• Provides a water recharge area
• Wildlife habitat
• Erosion control
• Natural pollution treatment system
Wetlands should be given serious attention in the master plan process
because of the importance of preserving their natural functions.
Wetlands
also impact planning through their protection under the Goemare-Anderson
Wetland Protection Act (Act 203, 1979. The Wetland Protection Act, to a
large degree, restricts or prohibits development within a wetland.
D.

Woodlots

Woodlots (large tree stands) represent a valuable natural and aesthetic
resource. In a city such as Fenton, which is largely developed and
continues to grow, they provide a natural element which offers visual
relief from an otherwise man-made environment. Woodlots can also be used
effectively as a natural buffer area between land uses or used to create
focal points. Planning and zoning measures which maximize the retention of
woodlots should be implemented.
- 53 -

�VIII.
A.

HOUSING ANALYSIS

Housing Conditions

A windshield survey of housing conditions was conducted in October 1987.
Housing was evaluated using a three category classification system. The
criteria used to assess the condition of the homes was: roof appearance,
siding appearance, foundation, and yard condition. Based on the rating of
these features, the homes were classified into one of the following three
groups:
Good to Excellent Condition
• Well maintained structure
• The yard is maintained consistent with community standard.
• If required, repairs are only cosmetic in nature.
• Roof and gutters are free from sagging.
• There is no evidence of foundation or exterior facade defects.
Fair to Good Condition
• Fairly well maintained structure.
• The yard is fairly well maintained.
• Several repairs and or maintenance tasks are required, but there is
no
evidence of significant structural damage.
• Home is in need of aesthetic improvements such as painting.
• Roof or gutters require some degree of repair.
• Upgrading the home to a "Good to Excellent ConditionN is warranted
given physical and economic considerations.
Poor Condition
• Structure is dilapidated.
• Major repairs would be required to upgrade rating classification
• Major structural deterioration. such as. roof, foundation and
exterior walls is evident.
- 54 -

�•
•

Lack of outside yard maintenance, and/or an unacceptable amount of
outside storage including junk or waste materials.
Upgrading the structure would be extremely costly, or it is beyond
repair.

The results of the survey revealed that despite an aging housing stock (By
1990, 65% of Fenton's housing units will be 30 years of age or older, and
50% will be 50 years or older) nearly all homes within the city were either
in good or fair condition. There were very few homes which warranted a
poor rating.
Based on the rating of individual homes, areas characterized by housing
within each classification were identified and delineated as shown in
Figure 13.
The "Poor Condition" classification was eliminated on the map due to the
limited number of homes rated in this category. However, the number of
homes in the poor condition category for each neighborhood is contained in
Tab e 17.
Each classification type represents the dominant character of the area, but
does not necessarily classify every structure in the area under that
rating.
Figure 13 also identifies low/moderate income blocks as noted in the report
"Community Development Block Grant Block Level Eligibility, Genesee County,
Michigan, January 1985 11 prepared by Public Demographics Inc •• These blocks
qualify for Co!ffllunity Development Block Grant assistance, since at least 51
percent of their population is classified as in the low/moderate income
group.
B.

Housing Mix

Recently there has been concern expressed about the balance between single
family and multiple family housing units within the city. There is al o
concern about how the recent increase in multiple family development will
impact the stability of what historically have been single family
residential neighborhoods.
- 55 -

�f

....

....-

I

l . . . . . . . .~._:_~

I

-

FIGURE 13

CITY OF FENTON

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FENTON, MICHIGAN

[ HOUSING CONDITIONS)

4IOOD TO llCCILLINT

MIi TO Cl0CXI

LOWIIIOmllAfll lNClca ILOClltl

•

�The 1980 census indicates that 81 percent of the city's 2,852 year round
housing units were single family homes. Multiple family housing units
comprised nearly 19 percent and mobile homes made up less than 1 percent.
Residential development
from the 1980 breakdown.
percent of new housing
housing units recording a

between 1980 and 1987 has differed dramatically
Single family housing has only accounted for 63
built during the period, with multiple family
strong 37 percent.

The change in the balance of single family and multiple family housing
which occurred between 1980 and 1987 has not substantially affected the
overall housing balance. In 1987 single family housing made up 79.3
percent of total year round housing, and multiple family housing 20.7
percent. This means that the percentage of multiple family units has
increased by only 2 percent since 1980.
If the residential trend established between 1980 and 1987 continues for an
extended period of time there will be a noticeable ~hift in the residential
character of Fenton. However, as of 1987, Fenton falls within a typical
range for percentage of multiple family housing (generally 10 to 30
percent).
There is no magic percentage for multiple family development. The city
should assess the type of residential image they wish to have, and equally
important determine if there is sufficient demand and suitable locations
for such development.
C.

Housing Conversion

The City of Fenton has many large older homes. Many of these homes exhibit
fine architectural style and some are designated as national or state
historic sites. Due to the high cost of maintenance and utilities for
these homes, owners have begun to approach the city about converting them
into multiple family units. Typically these homes are within a single
family zoning district, such as the homes along Shiawassee between Adelaide
and Owen Road. There has also been concern expressed about the impa~t
converted homes will have on the surrounding neighborhood.

- 57

�Upon first consideration it would appear that not the conversions should
not be permitted. This reaction could be based on a perception of
overcrowding, inadequate parking, or improperly maintained rental
properties; and these factors should be strongly considered. In some
cases, those perceptions may be misguided, or overstated.
Prohibiting all conversions also presents some problems. In some cases a
large home may be owned by an elderly person who has lived there for a long
period. They may wish to remain living there, but financial constraints
may prohibit or severely limit home maintenance or repairs. They are left
with two options: (1) to remain living in the house which would undergo a
gradual decline in quality, or (2) to sell or rent the home and find new
housing.
While the city should not encourage conversion of all large homes,
conversion should be permitted under very controlled circumstances. Within
the zoning ordinance, conversions could be controlled through use of the
special use permit process. Conditions could be established which would
minimize the impact of conversion on the neighborhood. For example: the
number of units could be limited to two or three per home, a minimum unit
size could be imposed, and onsite screened parking could be required.
Recognizing that some of these homes may not have resident owners and there
may be a few cases of property decline, the city could adopt a rental
property maintenance code. This code would set interior and exterior
maintenance standards which would have to be met by all rental properties.
Inspections could be conducted on an annual or bi-annual basis.
D.

Historic Homes

Historic homes are truly the essence of Fenton's character. The follo 1ng
list details all Fenton area homes listed on the state and federal register
of historic places.

- 58 -

�Federal Register:
Benjamin Bangs House
819 s. Leroy Street
Volney Church, Carlos B. Shotwell House
812 S. Adelaide Street
David B. Colwell House
901 S. Leroy Street
Colonel J. Hinckley House
210 High Street
H. N. Jennings House
800 S. East Street
Vermont House
302 N. Leroy Street

State Register:
Fenton House
302 • Leroy Street

These homes should be targeted for ongoing preservation activities
The
city should also consider other public improvements which would enhance the
neighborhoods which contain these homes.
E. Housing for the Elderly
National, statewide and county trends demonstrate the need for sen or
housing as the population of elderly (over 65) continues to rise faster
than the total population.
- 59

�Based on the low and moderate income level of $22,065 (80% of Genesee
County's median household income), we have identified 1170 households in
Fenton in the low and moderate income range and approximately 3065 persons
living in those households in 1987.
In 1980, 1212 people were identified as elderly (60 and older) in Fenton 1206 white and 6 minority. This accounted for 15% of the population. On a
national basis, approximately 16.4% of the population was 60 years and
older in 1984. Therefore, we can assume Fenton's elderly population is
about the same percentage as the national trends for 1984.
The 1987 Fenton
projections to the
that growth trends
elderly population

estimate for elderly population is based on Census
year 2030 of 26.9% of the national population. Assuming
are steady during that period, we can project Fenton's
to 17.1 percent of the 1987 population or 1,421 persons.

If we assume the low and moderate income elderly population is about the
same percent of the low and moderate income famili~s as it is with the
total population, we have identified about 524 senior citizens in the low
and moderate income category.
Table 23
Summary of Elderly Population, 1987
Fenton, Michigan
Low/Moderate
Income Elderly

Age Groups

Total Elderly

60 &amp;over

1421

524

65 &amp;over

1098

405

Source:

u. s.

Bureau of the Census, and The WBOC Group

Concerning housing needs for the elderly, many of the elderly residents
will prefer to live independently and only a few will require specialized
care. According to national figures, the percent of senior residents
requiring daily living assistance is quite low for those 65 and over

- 60 -

�Table 24
Percent of Seniors No Longer Able to Live Independently, 1987
Fenton, Michigan

Age Groups
65-69 years
70-74 years
75 years &amp; older

Requiring Living
Assistance

Requiring Living
Low/Moderate
Assistance in Fenton Elderll Reg.Asst.

2.6%
5.1%1
19.3%

8

Total:
1

3
4

12
109

40

129

47

Represents the average percentage for the three age categories: 75-79,
80-84, and 85 and older.

Source:

Real Estate Research Corporation
The WBDC Group Estimates

Based on the above, 109 senior citizens require some type of daily living
assistance while 47 of this number are classified in the low and moderate
income range requiring some kind of living assistance.
The City of Fenton has one elderly housing project (Dauner House) which has
100 elderly units. In addition, a new facility is planned just north of
the city. These two facilities should provide for the needs of Fenton in
the short term future. The elderly population will continue to grow.
Additional quantifiable data should be developed to assure future housing
provisions for the elderly.
The plan also contains several general recommendations which should benefit
the elderly in finding suitable and affordable housing. These
recommendations include: a provision for single family to multiple family
conversion, thus enabling seniors or low income households living in large
single family homes to stay in their homes because of the additional
revenue received from rental fees; that a variety of housing types and
sizes be provided in the city; and the selection of a suitable site for
manufactured housing which to date has proven to be a popular housing
choice of the elderly.

- 61 -

�F. Future Acreage Needs
Comparison of the 1974 and 1987 land use surveys provides a basis for
projecting future residential acreage needs. There were 242 acres
developed residentially during that time, resulting in an annual average of
18.6 acres.
Projecting the 18.6 acre average from a base acreage of 823 in 1987, Fenton
will require an additional 93 acres by 1992, and a total of 428 acres by
2010.
Another method of determining acreage need is to maintain the existing per
capita acreage for future population increases. Using this method, Table
25 identifies the number of additional acres needed by 2010 to meet
residential need for Fenton and surrounding communities.

Table 25
Residential Acreage Needs
PROJECTED
1987 EXISTING ACRES NEEDED
ACRES
1992
CITY OF FENTON

823

866

PROJECTED
ADDITIONAL
ACRES NEEDED ACRES NEEDED
2010
BY 2010
1,039

216

Surrounding 1
Communities
1 Surrounding Communities include Fenton Twp., Village of Linden, Holly
Twp., Rose Twp., and Tyrone Twp.
2 Value was calculated using Fenton's per capita residential acreage.
Source:

The WBDC Group

Surrounding communities are included in the above table because of Fenton's
potential to satisfy a portion of the housing need in these areas.

- 62 -

�IX. COMMERCIAL ANALYSIS
A.

Regional Perspective

The City of Fenton is located along U.S. 23 about 10 miles south of the
Flint urbanized area. Fenton, in addition to serving its own urban
population, acts as a suburban/rural retail center encompassing portions of
Genesee, Livingston, and Oakland Counties. Fenton's primary retail service
area encompasses an area within an eight mile radius around the City and
includes the Villages of Linden and Holly. The city's commercial base is
large enough to provide everyday goods and services and also capture a
significant portion of the larger comparison goods market. Still, Fenton
residents shop at regional malls in the cities of Flint, Ann Arbor,
Brighton, and Novi for some comparison goods.
8.

City-wide Perspective

The City of Fenton contains three distinct retail. districts: 1) along
North Leroy, Central Business District (CBD), and 3) along Owen Road. A
report of the Downtown Revitalization Committee prepared in December of
1984 identified the amount of occupied retail space in each of the three
districts classified in the following categories: convenience goods,
comparison goods, and general retail, as shown in Table 26.
This table provides a good general indication of the magnitude of each of
the districts as well as the merchandise types contained in each. A more
descriptive analysis of each co1m1ercial district is given below.
C.

Retail Analysis By Individual Commercial District

A description of each of Fenton's three commercial districts is given below
along with the identification of each districts strengths and weaknesses.
North Leroy District
The North Leroy District which is Fenton's largest retail district in
square feet of retail space represents a typical modern day commercial
strip center. This district is located along North Leroy from the north
- 63 -

�Table 26
Existing Occupied Retail Space
City of Fenton (Square Feet)
Total

Downtown

N. Leroy

Owen Rd.

Other

6,504
10,600

82,540
8,800

26,000
0

2,200 117,244
0 19,400

General Merchandise 8,150
Apparel/Accessories 18,070
Furniture/Appliances 1,664

53,300
13,280
3,800

0
0
0

0
0
20,000

61,450

Eating/Drinking
15,124
Places
Bldg. Mat'l/Hardware 19,625
Miscellaneous Retail 7,300

18,638
19,800
17,643

20,000
6,000
0

5,370
17,000
3,100

59,132

87,037

217,801

52,000

47,670 404,508

Convenience Goods
Food Stores
Drugstores
Comparison Goods
31,350
25,464

General Retail

TOTAL
Source:

62,425

28,043

Fenton Downtown Revitalization Committee, December, 1984

city boundary south to the CBD. Types of retail business include:
discount stores, fast food restaurants, auto service, home furnishings,
apparel, building supplies, specialty food, and general retail. This
district also contains two mini strip containing both retail and service
establishments.
Assets:
•
•
•
•

Location on the primary north-south route through the City
Largest retail district in the City.
Greatest selection of merchandise types.
North Leroy has been widened to a five-lane road.

- 64 -

�Weaknesses:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Insufficient landscaping along frontage and within parking lot areas.
High utility line visibility.
Poor building facade treatments.
Poor blending of facade materials and design from one business to the
next.
Land use conflicts (frequent intermixing).
Insufficient building setbacks.

Central Business District
The central business district, located at the City's center ranks second in
retail
floor space.
Although one district, ft contains several
distinguishable retail/office elements which include:
•
•
•
•
•

Fenton Square Mall.
Strip commercial development along North Leroy:
Predominantly medical office complex immediately west of Fenton Square.
City Government Administrative Complex immediately south of Fenton
Square.
Oibbleville historic commercial district located at West Shiawassee
and South Leroy.

Retail
and business activity in this district is characterized by
restaurants, personal services, offices, apparel shops, and specialty
shops.
Assets:
•

•

•
•

The central business district has a strong locational advantage with
all major traffic routes passing through or terminating within the
district. The CBO is also only a few minutes from the US 23 Freeway
High visibility.
Having the City of Fenton administrative offices located within t~e
district serves as a consumer draw for all commercial businesses
Office development provides a source of daytime cu~tOlfters for OBI

businesses

�•

The Mill Pond, Shiawassee River, and the park setting adjacent to the
City Hall create visual interest and are a natural draw to the area.
The Oibbleville commercial district and Fenton Square offer many fine
examples of historic structures with a variety of architectural styles.
The Fenton Hotel and the Michigan Bean Company, two of the Fenton
area's finest restaurants, are located within the district.

•
•

Weaknesses:
•

Fenton Square
Poor signage
Entrances lack signature quality and are confusing
Poor circulation within the Square
The quantity of businesses within the Square cannot be determined
from the perimeter roads.
The buildings have not been designed to work well together. Main
entrances/facades of certain buildings are not oriented to those
of others.
Conflicting architectural styles.
The Square lacks an inviting atmosphere which could be created by
a coordinated landscape design.
Difficulty in attracting customers after business hours.
•
•

•
•

Retail business mix.
Lack of parking in the Dibbleville District
Land use conflicts. Several heavy commercial or industrial uses are
incompatible with the commercial image of the CBO. The Expanded
Plastics Company located just south of the city administrative offices
is a good example of this situation.
Through traffic movements in the CBO are very difficult
Poor conmercial district image as one enters the CBD fr0111 the north
along N. Leroy.

OWen Road District
The Owen Road District is the smallest of the City's three major commerc al
districts in quantity of retail floor space This district due to t

�location at a U.S. 23 Freeway interchange.
commercial uses. Uses in this district include:
car dealerships, a bank, and a motel.

is oriented to highway
fast food restaurants,

Assets:
•
•
•

Easy entry to and exit from the U.S. 23 Freeway
Good streetscape character
Attractive business structures

Weaknesses:
•
•

Poor design of the Owen Road/U.S. 23 interchange.
Average daily traffic volumes on Owen Road exceed street capacity.

There are also assets shared by all the commercial districts. These
include: small town atmosphere, retailers know customers on a personal
basis, close proximity to the consumer population.·

D.

Future Acreage Needs

The commercial outlook for Fenton is prom1s1ng. Population within the city
and the surrounding area is projected to increase by over 20,000 by 2010.
The Fenton Downtown Revitalization committee in a 1984 report found unmet
demand in the following retail areas: drugstores, general merchandise,
furniture and appliances, restaurants, building material/hardware, and
miscellaneous retail. In their 1987 "Sourcebook of Demographics and Buying
Power", the CACI company report that people residing within the Fenton zfp
code area have an average of 15 percent greater capacity to purchase goods
in every retail category than the U.S. average.
If Fenton wishes to maintain their current per capita amount of retail
acreage, they will have to add 47 acres of commercial development ~etwen
1987 and 2010 (Table 27.)
An additional 73 acres of commercial land will be needed to meet the demand
of the growing population in the Fenton area. If the e1ty desires to
improve their position as a regional retail center. they have a good

• 67 •

�opportunity to meet regional retail needs within the t1t;
happen if commercial areas in Fenton can meet or e~ceed tile
comercia1 areas outside the city. The c1t1 should p1M for 1
50 acres of additional commercial land by 2010
Table 27
C011111ercia1 Acreage Needs
1987

Acres

179

188

Existing
Acres
Fenton

Needed
1992

221

Surround1ng 1
Connunitfes
TOTAL
1 surrounding comunitfes iftcll:lde Fenton -,.
Village of Holly, Rose Twp •• and Tyrone
2 TWJ&gt;.
Value was calculated using Fentoft's 1987 per
Source.

The WBD.C I o.up

■

�X. INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS
A Past Developa1ent Treads

on a land use survey conducted for
92 acres 1ft 1ndustrta1 cleve ..-nt.

Based
!Md

acreage was de¥el oped i the Fwtt» /U1+-~ ,cttt
the
-23 Freeway interchange 1t

u.s

development surrounding the central bat ness d1'~H~P!l~'T'
withe few scattered s tes found hroug

The existing land use survey coflducttd
reve-a ls •n ovem l nc.rea.se
1974 fbfs fncreas-e appu s 1
develnpnent in Fu on
1,acntne

in

ndt&amp;S:trf

aver;aged lf)Pll'C:JdN e1,y Ji

ac

�Fenton has good freeway access with three interchanges on U.S. 23, and I-75
being located approximately 10 miles east of the city.
Bishop airport in Flint is Fenton's closest airport.
It provides
commercial passenger travel and an air freight facility. The Detroit
Metropolitan airport located in Romulus is about an hour and a half driving
time south of Fenton.
Access to the CSX railroad, which is connected to the statewide rail system
is located nearby.
According to a 1986 survey of 11 Genesee County industrial parks, reported
in the May 1987 Flint-Genesee Corporation newsletter, the Fenton U.S. 23
Industrial Park recorded the most growth for the period 1976 to 1986 (see
Table 10 for complete survey results). It dropped from 124 to 40 acres of
uncommitted land from 1976 to 1986. The survey also indicated that there
were 54 remaining available acres combined within the Fenton U.S. 23 and
Fenway Industrial Parks.
Two independent studies have identified the Blinton
is a part, as offering the best opportunities
development within Genesee County. The Blinton area
the triangular area formed by Flint, Grand Blanc, and

area, of which Fenton
for future economic
is broadly defined as
Fenton.

The "Evaluation of Development Potential for Metropolitan Flint Michigan
report prepared by Northwestern-CUED Institute reconnends that economic
development efforts be focused on the Blinton area, and that the attract1en
of producer services should be encouraged. The report also 1ndicat•s that
successful leveraging of Bishop Airport will be the key to future eeu--••~
development.

ay

reconaeads t
Fenton serve primarily as a residential area in support of eCCti!ttl'li'i c
develo.,memt ~1t~in t~e 111~ton aNa
Thty n
hawe,er d 9Jl te the
Fenton u.s 23 and Fenway tndwstria1 Pa~is as a cent 1.Uing deve a,1111J1t
area
The Blinton Plan (draft June 21. 19.88) prepared

Sasakf

�C. Strengths and Weaknesses
Fenton's strengths in attracting industry are largely based on quality of
life and locational factors. A complete list of strengths are listed
below:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Quality of life
Good address
Small town
Good housing conditions
Historic character
Has independent image (not tied to Flint}
Property is generally appreciating faster than the rest of the county.
Can serve multiple markets
Good population base from which to draw employees, including cities of
Fenton, Flint, and Holly
• Closeness of Bishop Airport (20 minutes}
• Industrial land is available within industrial parks
• No competing industrial parks in southern Genesee County
• Flint foreign trade zone
• Effective city planning and zoning
millage passed in 1987 to fund improvements to Bishop Airport
should further enhance economic development efforts. Planned improvements
include: the addition of corporate hangars, an air freight facility,
passenger terminal expansion, and increased auto parking. Businesses whiett
require these services may now consider locating in Fenton.

A

Weaknesses in attractfng industrial business to Fenton include
• Labor union influence
• Li•ited size

Envfr0111111ent11 limitations within industrial Pl ks
• Poor design at US 23 interchanges
,,rat on af Ftmtim tt S ! 1nd fnvay

�The image and the quality of the industrial parks are being omt~• se4
by the introduction of general commercial uses which ar• 1nco,npat1
with industrial businesses.
• Poor entry image at both industrial parks

•

The first three weaknesses will be difficult to influence. however. the
final three can be corrected with proper planning and available f1n1nc1ng

o.

Future Acreage Need

Fenton is currently providing the only industrial park space in southern
Genesee County. If Fenton is to continue in the role as a regtont
industry provider, their future acreage need must be based
t
anticipated population growth not only of Fenton, bu:t of the surroutiading
communities as well.
Table 28 projects future industrial acreage Med for oth Fent
surrounding comunities. Acreage need was catculated by aJply !I Pefl Oil
current industrial per capita acreage against futur&amp; pepu1at on f eruses
Table 28
Industrial Acreage Need
1987
Existing
Acres

Fenton
SUM'OUn.diAf
C01111111n •s

Nm

105

Acres

Acres

1992

2010

Needed

110

*H~
132

M

k

IJ

�acres should be a1loeated if the city wishes to antinue t&amp;
regional industrial base. It 1s important to note that
are base on maintaining the same per capita 1ndustrila1- 'lttril
future. If the existing quarrtfty of 1ndustri« y dfV,e
considered less than fs desired for the cul'"rent popu tt ••
acreage would be needed in the future
Assuming that Fenton will continue to be the regional
Fenton's long tenn industrial land needs are for 150
land.
DeChiara and Koppelman's book •urban P1anntng
accepted source of standards in the ptanm1ng
sufficient industrial land for 50 years 1ntn
straight line projection of three acres pe~ ,-ar
acres needed based on 2010 project1on) F
industrial land by 2037 ttte,re 1s currently
vacant land remtining 1n Fentort~-s- two nd str
general development plan
Addi
al
needed for streets and portions w1
Given this long te
need ft is 1:tffPO
bufldable land left in
fndU

at:r'ft

amt
fte "Nit
tfie f un:,
(eve~

of

�XI. COMMUNITY FACILITIES
This section of the plan will prmde an
and include the following
wa1e:r •11
schools, and government buf dfng
current condition and need for i
connunfty facilities are shown. 1n F pre
A. Water System
Fenton draws their wat,r supply frM •11s locat:ed
ra1 l road tracks and west of North Road. Tile
tar
water treatment plant at the s.gie ttitt.rl loca:t1®
pumped to a 1,000,000 gallon storage tank le
1
on Denton Hill. Present1y the city 1s on '1 at
water per day (gpd) out of a c•paci ty of 3 2 11 :1 ~....,~n.:1111
c-,acfty The city averages 98 PQUft~S
which 1s high by conauon standards
h:as the ava11a~111ty of public watt,
appear to offer any defflopma11 lfJNt·flo&amp;t!·'kln

•maJ

�CITY OF FENTON

COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
P!INTON_, MICHIGAN
(

COMMUNITY Mctt.t'ltD

]

.......
---- ---

�Phase 3 involves the replacement of all watermains which are less than 4
inches in diameter (23,800 linear feet). This action was requested by lie
Michigan Department of Health due to concern over efficient water
transmission and fire protection. Their current nt1nfmutn stanh"NI
water main is 6 inches. In addition 22,000 feet of 4 inch water•·$ t
to be replaced. Phase 3 improvements totalling $275,000 of the tota1
$2,100,000 will be completed in 1988.
Phase 4 includes tapping the Westwood Subdivision fnto a 12 fnch •
This improvement is estimated to cost $15,000.

n

The city is also exploring the need for additional water storage whioh
would become phase 5. No cost estimates have been prepared.

B. Sanitary Sewer System
The City of Fenton is part of the Genesee County Sanitary Sewer Oisttict
No. 3, which treats sanitary sewage for the communities ef Fenton, f°fltOfti
Township, and Linden. The county's treatment plant, built fn 1J6S, bas
undergone several additions to increase capacity over the last 20 years
The city is responsible for maintenance of the co11ectf0ft st• eafi.:n
the treatment plant.
As Of July 6 • 1988 the dty hid pU'rehased 4.'J'',6P.'91111!'1¥1:l'Mltll

trRtment plant (I unit 1~ equ1va1ent to
90 gallons of •ater Pl!1'" capita pet"

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

I
I

Many areas of Fenton have sewer lines which are 80 years of age or older.
As expected a large number of these lines are in need of repair. The city
retained the Hycon Construction System Corporation of Clifton, New York in
1983 to conduct a survey of the physical condition of the sewer system.
A
significant infiltration problem was expected.
The survey identified the following deficiencies:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Protruding house connections
Cracked, broken and or crushed pipe
Deposits in joints
Offset and wide joints
Roots
Dips and bends in the lines
Pipe changing sizes between manholes

Cleaning
1983.

of

the

lines

and

joint repair for the system was completed in

The city, based on the findings of the Hycon study,
classification priority rating system as follows:

established

a four

Priority #1 - Critical - These areas of sanitary sewers are rated critical
because of the amount of city residents they service or the severity of the
damage to the pipes involved. These areas must be replaced to get our
system running smoothly. If any of these fail, the city will have a major
expense and lack of sewer services for sometime within areas of the city.
Priority #2 - Essential - Are areas of the city which are essential to keep
the city collection system in good working order.
Without these repairs
the city will face the problem of large expenses for repairs in the near
future.

- 77 -

�Priority #3 - Necessary - Areas in which the city has found broken pipes,
protruding connections, dips in pipes etc •• They are necessary to continue
a good collection system without too many disruptions.
Priority #4 - Replacement of all 6 inch sewer lines with 8 inch lines for
more capacity and to eliminate possible trouble areas.
The cost to implement the needed repairs contained in the above pr ority
classifications is $2,245,641. and includes 27,579 linear feet of sewer
line replacement.
The city has programmed $278,495. for 2,835 feet of sewer line replacement
in its 1988 budget. All of these improvements are priority #1
improvements. It is the city's intention to complete all priority #1
improvements before any priority #2 projects are initiated. (Consult the
1988 City of Fenton Capital Improvement Program for more detailed project
information.)
C. Capital Improvement Plan
The City of Fenton created a Capital Improvement Project Fund in 1980, thus
guaranteeing for the first time monies for infrastructure improvements
The city assesses 1.5 mils for this purpose. The city uses a five year
time frame for its capital improvement schedule, which ft updates om an
annual basis. A cap1ta1 improvement project is a major expend1tuni whfGl.b
will improve the physical plant of the city. The impro
of
a non-recurring nature and/or of long tenn benefit a

• Street construction/reconstruction
• Aequis1tfon of land
• Bui1d1ng construction
M1jor fac111ty improvements

Storm sewers

�The city has categorized the proposed capital improvements for the next
five years into four areas of concentration: streets, storm drainage,
major facility improvements and contingencies. A short discussion of need
within these areas is contained below.
Streets
Resurfacing of streets has and will continue to be a major expenditure
within the capital improvement project fund. The city has 41 miles of
streets and due to their age and condition, will need repair. Currently
the city is within a few years of resurfacing most streets within the city,
however, this activity is expected to be ongoing because of long time
period required to go through a resurfacing cycle. The city will also
concentrate on new street construction such as the widening of North Leroy
and the paving of the remaining unsurfaced streets.
Storm Drainage
A major problem in the city and therefore an area of concern for the
capital improvement program to address is storm water drainage. Large
segments of the city have either inadequate storm drainage or none at all.
At a minimum this causes unnecessary road maintenance and more seriousti
may create continual flooding problems for area residents.
Major Facility Improvements
This category entails one time projects. such as the Federel .Aid to
Systems Silver Lake Road project, which llll.Y be funded throwtb spect~
programs. Priority for these projects will have t
1
funding against the importance of other

1mplem:entat1on in a given year

�Contingencies
An important consideration of any well maneged fiffafl;tjia

p11n sb

reasonable fund balance front one year to the next. Th cS -.nsfim¥n•
be available for an~ unexpected project that uy dueloe 11be
is to carry an annual minimum fund balance of $13,000.
Projects proposed on the 1988-1992 capital 1•provenHmt $Chec'.hlli
most part include: street resurfacing, 1nsta!laticm of c1rh alild tlilffl
intersection improvements, and new storm sewer construction. E:sl
cost for these projects is $548,786. {Consult 1988 Cfty of f,enton ca,
Improvement Program for more detail on proposed prc)jects).

D

Public Schools

Schools within the City of Fenton are part of' the f;enitten Ar-et Puhl
Schools District
This district covers 35 s~u•re m11H
and -has a total enr-01 lntent of uv•r 2 7Qt ~
schmol build ngs a.re all located
th
h
maae ity- of tudent
he a
d the Ftntefl Area Pub
transported to their school on distr ct•-..ed bu
~ h..i~_.
ea: school bu11d119 ts d1scuued bl aw

�Fenton Middle School
The middle school untf1 recently served the 7th and Ith
portion of the building is being reftovated to 111a e ~
the 6th grade. This change will correspondtft01Y lllWlr
at each of the districts elementary sci'too]s lnro 1~
expected to be around 550 students Additional capacity d itbe ffllill
st111 be available as the second story wf11 not be in use
expansion plans are being considered at this t1me.
North Road Elementary
This school serves kindergarten through 5th gnadt.
about 450 students with a capacity of 500 De bu 1
sound and there are no plans for expansian

State Road Elementary
serves k nde;rgarten tttvougih
tbout 450, wi tb cap,c y of SQQ
11
tnere ,re. no Jlans fG

This

school

~

h gndt.
q 1&amp;

�The classes offered at the Center have been assimilated bact fn~
schools. No definitive plans for the building. or for relocn
made.

E Public Buildings

The following public buildings have been asse$sed as to I e
ability to meet the spatial needs for which they are intended
shown in Figure 14.
City Hall
The city hall located on South Leroy at the Mill Pond was oOl'tstruet
1976. Its location within the central business district makes
accessible to the city's residents. Prese~tly ft 1s
intended services. The building, a one stor,.v str
so that a second story could be added sho~ld the"
The building fs fo very good condftfon end there
expansion.

Police Station
The police station. censtructed A 1971 s
city hall The facflitJ is 1n tood t'Oftd1t1a

being met -n~ there
l&gt;w ld t ill~•

�I
I
I
I

I
I

I

I
I
I
I

I

'

The fire chief has indicated a need for one additional station within the
next five year period. This facility should contain 2 bays capable of
holding 4 trucks, 2 sets of doors for easy entrance and exit, meeting room,
and training room. The Owen Road/Shiawassee area has been targeted for the
new station because of rapid growth targeted in the western part of the
city. If Fenton continues with a steady growth rate, a third station would
be required within a 5 to 20 year period. This station should contain 2
bays to hold 2 trucks, an office, and small meeting room.
This station is being planned for the North and Leroy area. From this
location service to the northern part of the city could be provided without
the threat of train delay.
Fenton also supplies fire service to Tyrone Township, encompassing 36
square miles.
All service is presently provided from the Fenton Station.
If growth and the demand for fire services increases substantially in
Tyrone Township, a station may also be needed withih the Township. If this
were to happen, the building would be built by the Township and Fenton
would supply the staff and equipment.

Community Center
The community center is located on South Leroy adjacent to the Fenton
Square Ma11.
The center is commonly used for classes, meetings, and
wedding receptions.
It also provides a location for senior citizen
activities including travel, hot lunches, and card playing.
The building was built in 1937 and is in very good condition. Recent
improvements
to the building have included:
repainting, new light
fixtures, and a new sprinkler system for the grounds. Improvements to make
the building accessible to the handicapped are currently underway.
There
are no plans to expand the facility in the foreseeable future.

- 83 -

�A.J. Phillips Library
The library is part of the Genesee District
the building. but the Genesee
1
i
staff
The building WIS CMStrocQal n
There 1s not an identified need for adlditiGnt1 .,Males
there are no expansion plans for the present fac11 ty

Fenton Museum
The mwseum is currently housed
bufldfng The building is an h storic e\f'-llg..,.1h•e
building is structurally sound, attd there are no
the facility
DPW Garage
The garage 1s locetecl on L1neo1:n •t ffi'e
the build ng it not kn&lt;Mn, b
t

was not d s1gned for t
Hmitat 01s
Nin enanee
1

i!lll''NIIIFt.. u 1Hm151

�F. Parks
inventory of all ~it9 parks is ava11e1e
Master Plan. This plan 11sts all
all proposed future improvements

An

�XII. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The City of Fenton General Development Plan is shown in Figure 15. A
description of the intent for the districts shown on the Plan map is given
below.
Urban Core Residential
This district is intended primarily for single family residential
development. Existing homes within the district were built in the early
stages of Fenton's development as a city. The grid system subdivision
design and small urban lots are typical. Current density ranges from 2.6
units to 4.5 units per acre.
This district also contains a large number of architecturally significant
homes.
Future development is oriented to single family detached homes consistent
with the current density. Housing density should not exceed 4.5 units per
acre.
Conversion of large single family homes to multiple family
structures may be acceptable if appropriate zoning standards are
established and enforced.
This district is intended to recognize and maintain the older established
residential areas of the city which were developed with a consistent lot
size and development pattern. This district furthers the goal to provide
for a variety of housing types and values. The areas chosen for inclusion
in this district were based largely on existing development patterns
very Low Density Residential (Estate Residential)
This district is fntended for single family residenti1 d
large lots
Existing hous ng density is typically les
an
acre Future res dential development within this d s
exceed 2 units per acre

��This development pattern, in addition to broadening the
opportunities, is being us,ed to address environmeftal rz,• ~••n•• -.-.
southern portion of the city. Much of the l1nd -1 n
development limitations due to wetlands ant poo~ soil •
lots 1n this area allows better portions of ._ lot ,
development of a home while leaving less develo,ab e '9rtf
open space. This development density also offers nN..,.••tt •-~~--.preserve the mature woodlots that are fo~nd 1n this
The areas chosen for inclusion in this district were based
existing very low density housing and adj•cent .affe
features which would be an aesthetic eln fl~ es uer
environmental factors such as wetlands and pOlr s'011s
di
lot develofJlllent approach.
Low Density Residential

This district 1s tntended for extlusi,e s aig
development. Existing densftfes Within this d1stri~t r
fr•
per acre to 5 5 units per acre. Reeonrnended 4efts1t;r fv M
fs 2 to 4 un1ts per ere This district
eons den
t~ provide a ¥ar1ety of housing type tlld

�Areas chosen for inclusion in this district were selected for their
benefits in preserving natural features. Much of the land area within thts
district is comprised of floodplain, wetlands, poor soils, and woodlots A
density of 6 units per acre offers more opportunity to cluster housing and
thereby retain more natural features within open space. This density •lso
makes development within these restricted areas more economically feasi~la.
High Density Residential
This district is intended for multiple family residential deve1oprnent ,Wlfth
a density of 6 or more units per acre. This district would also be
acceptable for a manufactured housing park. This district is also part of
the plan goal to provide for a variety of housing types and values.
Areas designated as high density residential were selected based primarily
on existing high density development; close proximity to U.S. 23; low
impacts to Fenton streets; and soil conditions suitable for this
development type.
Industrial Park
This district is intended for general light industrial development
location of this district was detenn1ned by the existing leca
Fenton's industrial parks and to provide for a iuture an, t
150 acres of industrial land

Shore1in! Conservattpn
This dfstrjct is intended for the
wtth t

�The areas within this district were determined based on the fixed

location

of the Shiawassee River.
Planned Unit Residential Development
This district has been shown on the map as an overlay district. This
district is intended to highlight areas within the city in which developers
should be encouraged to use the planned unit development concept.
If the
PUD is not chosen the intent of the underlying district would apply.
The purpose of a PUD is to encourage innovation and flexibility in design
for residential development. A mixture of housing types are permitted as
long as they meet general design standards which would be included in the
zoning ordinance. This development district is particularly useful in
areas which are difficult to develop under conventional zoning regulations
due to environnental and other physical constraints. It is primarily for
this reason that this overlay district has been established.
A limited amount

of neighborhood commercial business would be acceptable

within the PUD concept.
Planned Mixed Use Development
The intent of this district is to encourage innovation and flexibility in
design for a mixed use development. This district recognizes that certain
combinations of residential, commercial, and industrial uses can
successfully be mixed within one development plan given specific design
standards. Such developments typically look less rigid and are
aesthetically more pleasing than developments built under the confines of
specific use zones.
This district was delineated as such because it maximizes development
opportunities for a site which is equally well suited to a variety of uses.

- 90 -

�General Commercial
This district is intended for the widest variety of retafl and service
businesses. Businesses could range from apparel shops, auto service, affll
restaurants through small commercial strip centers.
Locations for this district are based on collector or arterial frontage,
low impact to Fenton streets; existing commercial developments of as milar
type; and compatibility to adjacent uses.
Office/Service Conrnercial
This district is intended for low intensity co11111ercial uses. It 1s
designed specifically to be used along North Leroy just north of the CBD 1
where a transition of single family homes to comercial uses is occurr1dg.
This district will allow the use of single family homes for business
purposes, while minimizing negative impacts on traffic volumes and adjacent
single family homes. Businesses could include: medical office financial
office, personal services, and similar uses.
Highway Commercial
This district is intended to serve the commercial needs of the motor Ill
public Typical uses fn this district would include motels dr e-~•.,,_restaurants, and auto servie~ establfstaents

The location of this district is la'te1y d ctatd
interchanges

�This district is being shown as extending further south and east than the
existing Fenton Square because of a general need for more commercial
expansion in the city. Fenton Square has been chosen for expansion because
a number of studies as well as recent interviews with Fenton Square
business people have identified a need for a better business mix. This
cannot be satisfactorily resolved without the addition of new stores.
The area east of the Square contains an area of marginal housing which is
in a state of transition and is a logical choice for low cost expansion.
The area south of the Square was selected to create commercial uses along
the Mill Pond and make a physical connection to the government center and
its adjoining recreational uses.

- 92 -

�XIII.

ISSUES, GOALS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The following issues, goals, and recommendations have been developed to set a
framework for the implementation of the Fenton Comprehensive Plan. They have
been developed based on the numerous studies conducted for the plan,
interviews with city officials, county planners, Fenton business owners, and
Fenton residents. The issues presented in this section generally correspond
to the major components of the plan which include: transportation, land use,
housing, commerce, industry, community facilities, and future land use.
The following definitions will
section:

provide a better understanding of this

Issues
An issue is a statement of a problem, a situation for which corrective action
is recommended.
Goals
A goal statement identifies what is to be accomplished
issue.

pursuant to each

Recommendations
Are specific actions which should be taken to achieve goals. Also
identified in the recommendations section are major resources which will be
involved, time frame, and party responsible for implementation.
Each project will be prioritized as either a short or long range project
Short range projects are those which ideally should be completed between
1988 and 1995; and long range those to be completed between 1995 and 2001

�A.
I.

Transportation
ISSUE:
Presently Fenton does not have
north-south routing through the city.
GOAL:

well

defined

Improve north-south routing through the city.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

A. Recognize Adelaide as the primary north-south route
through Fenton. The intersections at North Street,
Silver Lake Road, and North Leroy should be improved to
enhance traffic flow along Adelaide. That could include
changes to both
intersection
geometrics
and
signalization.
Time frame: short range
Implementation:

City of Fenton

B. Access management should be employed along North Leroy
to control
the number, design, and placement of
driveways, thereby preserving the street's capacity as
property (re)develops.
Time Frame: short range
Implementation: Planning Commission

2.

ISSUE: The city's two industrial parks, though adjacent,
lack a desired road connection.
Construct a public road to connect the U.S. 23 and
Fenway Industrial Parks and provide a connector route
between Silver Lake Road and OWen Road.

GOAL:

- 94 -

�RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Connect Alloy Drive within the industrial parks. The
city has already acquired right-of-way for this purpose
making it the most cost effective connection. This
connection also permits truck traffic to enter and exit
the parks in close proximity to the Owen Road/U.S. 23
interchange.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton
This
Drive north to Fenway Drive.
connection is recommended even if the Alloy connection
is made because it better serves the function of an
intra-city connector route. The Steel Drive connection
would also include modification of the intersection with
Alloy Drive to favor traffic on Steel, constructing a
"signature entrance" and possibly a center turn lane
along Owen Road at the entrance.

B. Extend Steel

Time Frame: Short to Long Range
Implementation: Industrial Park Developers, and City of
Fenton
ISSUE: Downtown circulation is circuitous, confusing. and
inefficient.

GOAL. Improve the efffciency and design of the do town
circulation system
RECOMMENDATIONS

A Connect Silver Lake Road
traff c conge t1on
h r
Leroy
ee
g
t

h

in

�and associated improvements). This would require
acquisition of right-of-way and the cooperation of the
CSX Corporation to allow an additional crossing of the
rail line.
The precise alignment and design of this project would
require
detailed engineering studies addressing
horizontal and vertical grades, design speeds through
curves, the need for preemptive traffic signals
electronically linked to rail crossing gates, impact on
adjacent properties, and cost estimates etc.
Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation:
B.

City of Fenton, CSX Railroad

Install an exclusive left turn lane along Silver Lake
Road, from South Leroy Street through the intersection
with North Leroy. This may require right-of-way
acquisition.
Time Frame: Short to Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

C.

Close First Street east of North Leroy to reduce traffic
conflicts and provide additional parking for the Fenton
Hotel and other nearby businesses This improvement
would also include increasing the radius at Main and
North Leroy to allow trucks turning right onto Main from
North Leroy to successfully navigate the turn.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation C ty of Fenton

�--

0

I

fiw

I

I
I
I

-J ,,_ - ·--

'/

/

I I

I

,'

/

ti

I

,' I
I

I

,

0
0
1-

a:

I

I

z
z

w
w

I

I

I

I

/

z

1

z

I

:c

l

.::-;' " -

---- ----

0
0

N
I

~

w

..I

~

en

�D.

Remove the short east-west connection between Roberts
and Silver Lake Road (just west of South Leroy Street)
thereby forcing traffic to use the 90-degree
intersection.
This improvement should not be
implemented until the Silver Lake/Adelaide intersection
is improved.
Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

E.

Redesign the entrances to Fenton Square to reduce
congestion and confusion. This recommendation includes
the following actions:
•

The north entrance should provide separate stacking
room for vehicles exiting at the intersection through
installation of curbing.

•

The west entrance (Caroline) should be redesigned to
make it more visible, parking near that access should
be eliminated, the access should be extended east to
the center of Fenton Square and landscaping should be
provided along South Leroy Street between Silver
Lake Road and the Community Center.

•

The southern entrance should be redesigned to promote
it as an access into Fenton Square and signify South
Leroy as the through route. A new sign, curbing,
brick pavers, and landscaping are needed at the
entrance.
The project would also require some
modifications to South Leroy at this location which
would include smoothing out the curvature in the road
by the Community Center.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Fenton Square
- 98 -

�F.

Vacate Walnut or Pine Streets to allow expansion of
Fenton Square and its parking areas. As single family
housing conditions along Walnut and Pine decline, these
areas should be redeveloped as part of Fenton Square.
Fenton Square is currently restricted in their efforts
to create a successful business mix by a lack of room
for new stores. As this redevelopment occurs there will
not be a need to maintain both Walnut and Pine as public
streets. Portions of these streets could be vacated and
become part of Fenton Square. A final design decision
regarding these
streets should only be made in
conjunction with a long range master plan for Fenton
Square.
Time Frame: Long Range to Very Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Fenton Square

4.

ISSUE: Poor traffic operations
interchange ramps.

at

the Owen Road/U.S. 23

GOAL: Improve interchange design and traffic controls.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Install traffic signals at ramp terminals.
This would
involve approvals from the Michigan Department of
Transportation (MOOT), under guidelines of the Federal
Highway Administration (FHA).
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, MOOT, and FHA

B.

Relocate ramps to current accepted standard design
distance from bridge, or reconstruct bridge with lower
crown and four lane cross section, to improve motorist
sight distance.
- 99 -

�Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, MOOT, and FHA
5.

ISSUE: There are sight difficulties at the Torrey Road/South
Long Lake intersection. The problem intensifies at
night when some motorists confuse northbound U.S. 23
traffic with northbound Torrey Road.
GOAL: Improve sight visibility and eliminate confusion over
traffic patterns.
REC01MENDATIO S:
A.

Lower bridge railing along Torrey Road.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implemen ation: City of Fenton

B.

Plant landscaping along the west side of Torrey Road so
that motorists on South Long Lake Road can more easily
distinguish vehicles on U.S. 23 from those -0n Torrey
Road.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

c.

Consider installation of a blinking red/amber light at
the intersection to alert motorists of intersection
location.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton
- 100 -

�6.

ISSUE: There is a history of traffic operation problems and
accidents at all rail crossings.
GOAL: Improve traffic safety at all rail crossings.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Install rail crossing gates at
Adelaide.
Time Frame:

Leroy and

possibly at

Short to Long Range

Implementation: City of Fenton, CSX Railroad, and MOOT
7.

ISSUE: Several
capacity

streets are

currently at

or approaching

GOAL: Increase roadway capacity through improvements such as
widening streets and redesign of intersections.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Widen Owen Road, from Jennings to Shiawassee, to three
or four lanes, with turning lanes at major intersections
as development warrants.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

B.

Widen Silver Lake Road, from the west city limits
through the Adelaide intersection, to four lanes, with
turning lanes at major intersections as development
warrants.
Time Frame: Widen at
Remainder - Long Range

Adelaide

- 101 -

- Short Range;

�Implementation: City of Fenton and MOOT
C.

Widen North Road, from Leroy to Adelaide, to four lanes;
and/or redesign the intersection with Adelaide to
enhance north-south travel along Adelaide (including
left turn lanes and possible signalization).
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

D.

Widen Main Street, from the proposed intersection with
Silver Lake Road to the east city limits, to four lanes
with turn lanes at major intersections.
Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

E.

Widen Adelaide, from North Street to Shiawassee, to four
lanes.
Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

F.

Cul-de-sac Round Street north of the OWen/Shiawassee
intersection to reduce vehicle trips through the
intersection and to reduce the potential for traffic
conflicts caused by the intersection I s limited sight
distance and poor design. This recommendation should
only be implemented if Grant Street can be extended west
to Steel Drive. This extension would provide access for
the industrial uses along Grant Street through the
industrial park rather than impact homes along Grant
east of Round. The city should encourage the Grant
Street connection to Steel Drive.

- 102 -

�Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton
G.

Redesign traffic control at the Leroy and Shiawassee
intersection with a full traffic signal, and move stop
bars for northbound traffic to the north to provide
better visibility. Curb extensions should be considered
to improve safety for pedestrians crossing the streets.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, MOOT

H.

Construct a left turn lane on Silver Lake Road at
Adelaide. This could require relocating parking areas
for two businesses at the corners.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, MOOT

a.

ISSUE: New collector streets should be planned for large
undeveloped areas which may undergo development fn the
near future.
GOAL: Identify general alignment fer co11eetor s
w111 be needed in tflte futurf!

RECOMMENDAT:IONS.
A
f
be ttie primary access

11¥er
Raid
df raeted away ff'!

�Time Frame: Short to Long Range, should be in pace with
development of the area.
Implementation: City of Fenton, Private Developers
B. Construction of a collector street in the city's
northeast section as development occurs. This route
could link Eddy Lake Road with North Lemen, connect the
gap in Lemen, and thereby provide alternative routing to
Leroy and Main Streets. The city could consider
"precisely platting" the alignment.
Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Private Developers

C. Acquire Gravel Pit Road for a future collector. This
road would open up land south of w. Shiawassee to the
city limits for future residential development. If
acquired, the road should be repaved.
Time Frame: Short to Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton
9.

ISSUE: There are insufficient access management guidelines
contained within the zoning ordinance to help preserve
roadway capacity through regulation rather than street
widening.
GOAL: Improve traffic operat1mns and preserve £IP£
through the development and adoption of access
management guidelines

�•

RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

•

Adopt access management guidelines in the Fenton Zoning
Ordinance which give specifics for driveway placement,
intersections, and parking design standards etc •
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Commission

10.

ISSUE: There
system.

is

not

an

officially adopted bicycle path

GOAL: Improve routing for bicycles by establishing and
adopting an official bicycle path system.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Implementation of the city's 1984 "Bicycle Route
Evaluation"
study
recommendations,
which
include
construction of exclusive bike lanes or bike paths
along:
•

Adelaide Street from North Road to South Holly Road.

•

North Road from North Leroy to Poplar Street.

•

Silver Lake Road from Adelaide to Jennings Road.

•

Shiawassee Street from Donaldson to Adelaide and
possibly onto the library and gazebo area (extended
from the previous study).

•

Installation of signage to designate certain streets
as bicycle routes, as noted in the previous study.

•

bike
Where
possible,
incorporated along the

path segments could be
proposed Shiawasee River

- 105 -

�Corridor pedestrian linkage syst:elll. ~ t
other bike routes would be proviaed Whete fna,e11,~,.
Time Frame: Long Range
Imp1ementat 1on : City of Fenton

B. Land Use
1.

ISSUE: Screening techniques betweeo
uses and residential areas
GOAL:

Provide for adequate screeni~Jlbuff•rfng: betea
industrial

or

commerch1

11sn -t.li

resident al areas
RECOMffDATIOJtS:
The location of an industrial or
next to a resfdent al 4istr1ct in
possible
the general
are recOlllllelded

~

,n

a1 d

�Time Frame:

Imp1ementation:
2.

City of Fenton

ISSUE:

There are several cases and trends of land use
conflicts or incompatibility throughout the city.

GOAL:

Eliminate or minimize impacts of existing land use
conflicts and prevent new conflicts from occurring
through sound planning and zoning.

RECOMMENDATIONS:

A.

•

•

Short Range

Encourage those businesses which have been identified as
land use conflicts (identified in existing land use
section of the plan) to use screening or other aesthetic
measures to mitigate their impact on
surrounding
development.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, private property owners

B.

Encourage the relocation of Expanded Plastics and
redevelopment of the site. This may involve purchase of
the building, offering of tax abatement on a more
suitable site, or other relocation assistance.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

C.

Pursue a course of action which will eventually
eliminate all serious land use conflicts within the
city.
This would involve rezoning parcels for a more

- 107 -

�■
■

•

compatible use, so that such uses will not be allowed to
expand,
and establishing zoning requirements which
restrict
the expansion
or
reconstruction
of a
non-conforming use.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Commission

D.

Do not allow any commercial zoning or uses within the
Fenway or U.S. 23 industrial parks except for small
parcels fronting on Silver Lake Road at Alloy Drive.
Current commercial zoning within the industrial area
should be removed, which will
involve a zoning
amendment. This land use planning strategy is important
for the following reasons:
•

Commercial uses are incompatible with industrial uses
within an industrial park setting. The commercial
uses
compromise the industrial image which is
important
for
attracting new industry and the
creation of future permanent jobs in the city.

•

The remaining vacant land within the industrial parks
is
needed to satisfy the projected long range
industrial land needs of Fenton. This plan projects
a long term need of 150 acres. Presently, there are
only 140 buildable acres remaining in the industrial
parks.

P

~

Industrial uses will generate considerably less
traffic in the area, thus reducing traffic congestion
impact on Silver Lake and Owen Roads.
Aesthetically. industrial uses will be less offensive
than the commercial activities.
Commercial uses
depend to a large extent on extensive signage to
attract Cl1stomers.
- 108 -

�•

The industrial area, located adjacent to U.S. 23
freeway (between three interchanges) is an ideal
location for
potential
industrial
development.
Improved sites, ready access to the freeway system
and excellent visibility are only a few of the assets
of this location.

•

Some of the concerns with the development of
commercial uses in this area include the eventual
conflict of commercial and industrial traffic, the
poor access to the commercial uses along Alloy and
the mixing of commercial and industrial uses which
creates considerable congestion for both uses.

•

The city has ample commercial areas available for
development.
Therefore, infringing on the prime
industrial area of the city is not warranted.

Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Commission

E.

Do not allow further encroachment of commercial uses
into the residential strip along Silver Lake Road
between Adelaide
and
Ponchartrain.
This can be
acco~plished through appropriate master planning and
zoning.
Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Commission

F.

The intrusion of commercial uses into the residential
area along North Leroy just north of the CBD should be
contained and not be allowed to connect to the
commercial district further north.
This
can
be
accomplished through appropriate master planning and
zoning.
- 109 -

�Time Frame: Short Range

Implementation: City of Fenton. Planning O)atal s

3.

ISSUE: North Leroy has a negatiye streetse1pe tmaeter
GOAL: Make improvements and set standards wftfcll i1
the character alon9 North Lerqy end other
tho~oughfares fn the ~fty

RECOMMENDATIONS:
A. Create strict zoning requirements for d
parking •nd. b~11d 19)
sf...,,.p
a.I

Landscaping rec\fu reme
and interior landscap n1
Time Frame: Short Range

B

�■

■

Time Frame: Short to Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, private property owners
C.
1.

Natural Features
ISSUE: Adverse development
sensitive areas.

impacts

on

environmentally

GOAL: Maximize the preservation of unique and valuable
natural resources from the impacts of development.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Through zoning and flood plain ordinances restrict and
manage development within the shoreline conservation
district
and other flood plain and wetland areas
throughout the city.

8.

Use the natural features information in this plan during
site plan review. Knowing if there are environmentally
sensitive areas within a site being reviewed will allow
the planning commission to evaluate whether the proposed
plan maximizes preservation of natural features.

C.

Encourage the planned unit development concept in areas
so designated on the general development plan (Figure
15). This will give the planning commission increased
control in ensuring environmental preservation.

D.

Enforce compliance with the Goemare-Anderson Wetland
Protection Act (Act 203, 1979).

E.

Initiate a street tree management program. The focus of
this program would be tree regeneration.
This action
will prevent a particular block(s) from being clearcut
due to all trees reaching mature age at the same time.
- 111 -

�F.

Consider purchasing environmentally sensitive areas for
future passive park lands.

G.

Acquire or obtain easement rights for a trail system
along the entire length of the Shiawassee River and Mill
Pond
Time Frame: A through G, Short to Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton

D.
1.

Housing
ISSUE: Balancing the mix of multiple and
housing.

single family

GOAL: Allow a mixture of both housing types, but retain a
strong single family orientation.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Fenton should not establish a ratio standard to achieve
a proper balance between multiple and single family
development, but rather should manage multiple family
development through the allocation of land at
appropriate sites. This is accomplished through
planning and zoning.
Time Frame: Short Range

2.

Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Comissfon
ISSUE: Conversion of large single family homes into mult ple
family units.

Pennft the conversion of single family homes on a
11m ted bass with strict controls

GOAL.

- 112 •

�RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Conversions should only be permitted under a special use
permit process. Standards should be set up which would
have to be met before the conversion would be approved;
for example the number of units could be limited to 2 or
3
units per home, a minimum unit size could be
established, on-site screened parking could be required,
or converted units could be limited to no more than 20
percent of the homes on a block. The city may want to
consider conversions only within the urban core
residential district.

B. The city should consider the implementation of a rental
property maintenance code. This code would set interior
and exterior maintenance standards which would have to
be met by all rental properties. Inspectinns could be
conducted on a annual or bi-annual basis.
Time Frame: For A and B, Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Commission

3.

ISSUE: Historic Preservation for Housing

GOAL: Encourage the establishment of historic districts and
the preservation of individual historic homes as
appropriate.
RECOMMENDATIONS:

A Any housing rehabilitation effor
ho d
priority on h storic heme
A pro ty
placed on historic res
r pub c
improvements
- 11

�Time Frame: Ongoing
Implementation: City of Fenton
4.

Housing opportunities for low/moderate income
ISSUE:
families.
GOAL: Continue to provide and improve housing opportunities
for low/moderate income families and individuals.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Provide housing in a variety of types and sizes.

B.

Focus housing and infrastructure rehabilitation efforts
in low/moderate income areas as identified in Figure 13.
Time Frame: For A and B, Short to Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Planning Commission, and
Genesee County

E. Commercial
1.

ISSUE: The Fenton Square Mall is poorly designed and lacks a
cohesive image.
GOAL: Improve the image, design, cohesiveness, and vitality
of Fenton Square.
RECOMMENDATIONS:

A. A mater plan should be pr pared to guide the future
development of Fenton Square This plan should e alua e
and make recommendation
n the
1
architecture, landscaping, on-site c rculat1on sfgnage
entry treatments unification of mall stores, and
marketing strategy
114 -

�Time Frame: Short Range
Implementation: City of Fenton, Fenton Square Businesses
B.

Fenton Square should be expanded to Pine Street on the
east and to the Mill Pond on the south. The north side
of the Mill Pond should be developed commercially from
the Fire Station to East Street. A walkway should also
be built along the Mill Pond. This improvement would
require the demolition of several structures.
Time Frame: Long to very long range
Implementation: City of Fenton

F.

Industrial
Many of the improvements needed to improve the city's
industrial parks are transportation related and are addressed under
transportation recommendations.

1.

ISSUE: Zoning Requirements for the Industrial Park district.
GOAL: Establish zoning requirements which will provide a foundation
for quality industrial development and address the aesthetics of
the development as viewed from the U.S. 23 freeway.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
A.

Minimum lot size within the industrial park district should be 3
acres.

B.

A setback of at least 100 feet should be ru1ntafned along the
23 freeway.

- 115 -

�c.

Loading areas should be designed o~ s
u.s. 23 to the maximum extent possible
C can ~e achieved through Jon ng ord1M.R¢e • • • ~

T1ine Frame. Short Range
lntplementat1on. City of Fentea. Pl•~n1~g Clnlrin

G.

1.

Comunfty Faci11tfes

ISSUE: There 1s cur~ent1y ~o for1111
Fenton.

RECOMMENDATIONS.
A. Make side1111ks eligible o fuNltd
sewer c•p tal tmp ,,_,.,,. f1:md

Time Fr1111. S

rM9h Ute

�city to have their vehicle maintenance
garage for higher cost.

performed at a private

Time Frame: Long Range
Implementation: City of Fenton. Fenton Area School District.

- 117

�XIV. IMPLEMENTATION
Major steps to be taken in implementing the C1tyi of Fent-l)ft
Plan include the following:
•
•
•
•

0.,NIIMiffa

Establish priorities for transportation ud beautlf1cattat
(Incorporate into Capital Improvement Pregram).
Begin revision of zoning ordinance and map.
Assessment of funding sources.
Action strategies for specific areas fdentfffed in plam.
- Master Plan for Fenton Square
- Detailed intersection studies/preliminary engineering
- Engineering/design for road improvements
- Revise and implement bicycle plan.
- Burying utility lines.
- Street tree management program.
- Land acquisition for park lands.

pl'1ld'81~~

�XV. RECREATION
We recommend that the 1987 City of Fenton Recreation Master Plan be
recreation component of the city's comprehensive plan. The recreation p M
has been prepared to meet the Michigan Department of Natura!~-~
guidelines and makes the city eligible to apply fo~ state •IKI fide
grants.

�•
•

XVI.

BIBLIOGRAPHY

The following resources were used in the preparation of the City of Fenton
Comprehensive Plan.

Census Data, U.S. Department of Convnerce, Bureau of the Census. 1950
to 1980.
Population, Income, and Household Projections, National
Corporation, Ithaca, New York, March 1988.

Planning Data

Population Projections, Michigan Department of Management and Budget,
Office of Revenue and Tax Analysis, March, 1985.
Population Projections, Genesee-Lapeer-Shiawassee Region V Planning and
Development Commission, Flint, Michigan 1986.
Population Projections, Southeast Michigan Council of Governments, Region
1, "Small Area Forecast," Detroit, Hichigan.
Population Projections, The WBDC Group, Grand Rapids, Michigan, 1988.
Civilian Labor Force and Employment Estimates for &amp;eauee and Shia:w.ss"
Counties, 1980 and 1987, Michigan Employme11t Security Colllltssion.
Bureau of Research and Statistics - F~eld Analysts Ul.li
Michigan.

News

Repo~t

Flint-Genesee
Mi¢hig,ae 1 May 1 1:9&amp;7.

�Existing Land Use and Housing CGnditions F1e1d Sll.lrvey (Ottolle
WBDC Group, Grand Rapids, Michigan.
1975 Fenton Master P-lan for Land Use, City of Fenton Pl•n
and V11ican Leman and Associates, Fenton, Michigan.

Fenton Wetlands Map, prepared by the National Wetl.-Js IMerd~~.
Department of the Interior. Fish a11d VHcfltfe- S.rvtce, Wash "·»~"!:.,
1978.
Soil Survey, Genesee County, Michigan, U.S. Department ef Agf'icult
Conservation Service in cooperation with the Mitbip~ Agr eut
Experiment Station, Genesee, Michigan--,. 1N7. dt.!CIM•
a ,- ..~
1972.
Flood Insurance Rate Map for City ef FentN- Nation
Program, Federal Emergency Management AfeKY ·
Photography of City of Fentcm risg) e.t:esn
Pl ann1 ng Conwlrl ss ion , Flint , Mi ch Pit•

Aer1a1

llopk
Demog lph

�The Blinton Plan (Draft June
Watertown, Massachusetts.

21,

1988),

Sasaki

&amp; Associates Inc.,

1988 City of Fenton Capital Improvement Program, City of Fenton, Fenton,
Michigan.
Urban Planning and Design Criteria (Third Edition), OeChiara and Koppelman,
Van Nostrand Reinhold Company Inc., New York 1982.
City of Fenton Water System Study. Spicer Engineering,
1981.
City of Fenton Bicycle Route Evaluation,
1984.
1987 City of Fenton
Michigan.

Recreation

Saginaw,

Michigan,

City of Fenton, Fenton, Michigan,

Master Plan,

City of Fenton, Fenton,

Traffic Counts by Intersection (Counts taken on 12-17-87 and 12-18-87,
counts taken for one half hour and expanded to reflect one hour
volumes):
Leroy at Main/First
Silver Lake at Roberts
South Leroy at Silver Lake
North Leroy at Silver Lake
South Leroy at Shiawassee
North Leroy at North
North Adelaide at North
East Caroline at Walnut
South Adelaide at Shiawassee
North Adelaide at Silver Lake

- 122 -

�Persona

Interviews:

Edward B. Koryzno Jr., City Manager, City of Fenton.
Michael Cain, Administrative Assistant, City of Fenton.
Leslie P. Bland, Director of Public Works, City of Fenton.
Gerald Cattaneo, Police Chief, City of Fenton.
Bruce Dorland, Fire Chief, City of Fenton.
Ann Black, Executive Director, Fenton Area Chamber of Commerce.
Kathryn Cain, Director, Fenton Community Center.
Esther Alderman, Financial Administrative Assistant, Fenton Area
Schools.
Bob Chenowith, Developer of Fenway Plaza and co-chairman of the Fenton
Growth Resources Committee.
Jerry Mansour, Mansour Developments, Flint, Michigan.
John Mansour, J.M. Developments, Fenton, Michigan.
Jim Pushman, Pushman Manufacturing, Fenton, Michigan.
Jim Dmoch, Ideal Pharmacy in Fenton Square, Fenton, Michigan.
Lynn McClure, Dancers Store in Fenton Square, Fenton, Michigan.
Philip G. Stair, Genesee County Metropolitan Planning C01111tissfon,
Economic Development Division, Flint, Michigan.

Timothy Leonard, Principal Planner, Genesee County Metropolitan
Planning Commission, Flint, Michigan.
- 123 -

�Tom Goergen, Planner, Genesee County Metropolitan Planning Commission,
Flint, Michigan.
Jul ·e A. Hinterman, Community Development
Development Program, Genesee County
Corn~ission, Flint, Michigan.

Specialist, Conmunity
Metropolitan Planning

Anthony Schifano, Executive Director, Flint-Genesee Corporation, Flint,
Michigan.

Public Meetings on Master Plan:
October 8, 1987
January 21, 1988
February 18, 1988
March 31, 1988
May 5, 1988
June 16, 1988
September 15, 1988
November 3, 1988 (Public Hearing)
December 15, 1988

- 124 -

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008206">
                <text>Fenton_Comprehensive-Plan_1989</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008207">
                <text>City of Fenton Planning Commission, City of Fenton, Genesee County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008208">
                <text>1989-02</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008209">
                <text>City of Fenton, Michigan Comprehensive Plan 1989</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008210">
                <text>The City of Fenton, Michigan Comprehensive Plan 1989 was prepared by the City of Fenton Planning Commission with assistance from The WBDC Group in February 1989.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008211">
                <text>The WBDC Group (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008212">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008213">
                <text>Fenton (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008214">
                <text>Genesee County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008215">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008217">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008218">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008219">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008220">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038319">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54693" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58964">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/caa188fc71e9fb6b1124d5ea22846247.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2179ef5b16bed36e913364bf53265431</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008205">
                    <text>G · eral ~velopment Pia

Eri&amp; ownshi , Michi a

�IV ark A Wyck ff
400 Everett Dr.
.lansln&amp; Mich. 48915

. FROM THE Lli3HARY OF
.elanning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc.

" . .. growth cannot possibly come at once any more than a seed can
spring into a tree over night. Unless the pattern is set and followed,
proper growth can never materialize . The alternative is to pay the price
in crime, juvenile delinquency, inadequate schools, inadequate parks,
and worst of all, inadequate human beings . .. "
Justice Pau l L. Adams, Mich igan Supreme Court

December, 1974

General Development Plan

Erie Township, Michigan
Adopted November 11, 1974 by the Erie Township Planning Commission
Approved November 12, 1974, by the Erie Township Board
Approved December 12, 1974, by the Monroe County Pl an ning Commission
Johnson, Johnson &amp; Roy /inc.

Planning/ Landscape Architecture

��LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Man-Built Features Map
Landscape Zones Map
Planning Districts Map
Bay Creek Illustration
Rural Residential Development Example
Major Street Plan
Communities Facilities Map
Erie Township Center Land Use Guide
Half Way Creek Land Use Guide
General Development Plan
Regional Context
Historical Map of Erie Township
Population Change for Erie Township
Glacial Deposits
Streams of Erie Township
Hydrology Map
Piezometric Water Level Map
Soils Map
Soils Summary
Vegetation

IV

7

9
11
15
17

21

23
31

33
35
41

43

47
56
57
59

60
62
63

65

Natural Determinates
Regional Transportation Corridors
Transportation
Utilities

66
68
69

Recreation/Open Space Systems
Possible Development Strategies
Bedrock Topography
Overburden Thickness

74

71
73

76
77

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

Introduction
General Development Plan for Erie Township

3

Community Goals
Summary
Landscape Zones
Planning Districts
Investments in Public Facilities
Implementation of Planning Guidelines
Design and Development Guidelines

5
6
8

Basis of the Plan for Erie Township
Summary
Regional Context
Social and Economic Trends
Agriculture in Erie Township
The Natural Environment
The Human Environment
Three Possible Development Strategies
Appendix
Geology
Vegetation Types
Population
Housing
Economy
Government
Zoning Areas
Land Use
Planning Standards
Projected Development Capabilities
Questionnaire Results
Bibliography

,,,-----

10

20
25
31
37

39
40
42
51
52
67
74
75

76
78
80
82
88
90
91
92
93
99

100
101

V

�, tty

(!
I

;

Township Center

Q_ ~/Yi;--:.
,C

.._

d

l-

�INTRODUCTION
The following General Development Plan is the first prepared for Erie Township, Michigan . It was
prepared at this time because the Township Planning Commission realized that Erie Township is
now facing several very serious problems concerning growth and development. The flooding of
the Lake Erie shoreline, the threatened destruction of a rural way of life because of real estate
speculation, the growth of inefficient and costly "strip developments" along major highways these are just a few of the problems the Township must solve in the next few years .
The content of this plan is the result: of many meetings of the Township Planning Commission
reviewing the consultants proposals; of citizen discussions at information hearings; and of
community surveys. Considerable time has been spent to make sure this General Development
Plan reflects the needs and opportunities of Erie Town.=;hip .
The General Development Plan, properly followed, will help the Township solve these problems.
Just as importantly, it will help Township residents foresee and solve other problems which may
arise in the future.
It would be a mistake, of course, to assume that the changes and development outlined in the
plan will happen automatically. The planning process, with regular involvement of residents, must
continue in Erie Township for the plan to be effective; it must be understood by most residents
in the township and be put into action through their common sense and their willingness to work
hard .
The alternative is to permit unplanned growth, thus wasting tax dollars, requiring higher taxes,
and falling short of the "Quality of Life" that Erie residents have a right to expect through good
township government.

�No plan of this size will continue to be fully applicable, so as the years pass and attitudes change
the residents of Erie Township may be called upon to adjust the plan. The plan, therefore, has
been designed to be flexible . The main ideas of the plan and its general framework should remain
constant for Erie Township for many years to come, although certain details of the plan may
become outdated. These details can, therefore, be changed without greatly affecting the plan's
main ideas. It will be the duty of the Planning Commission and the citizens of the Township to
preserve the main ideas of the plan and to change the details when necessary. To do this, not only
the plan itself must be understood - although that is important - but, also the reasons behind
the plan must be known. Everyone involved in the planning process must become familiar with
soil types, groundwater levels, and social and economic trends affecting the Township. Everyone
must know enough about planning, and enough about the Township, to know which parts of the
plan to keep and which to alter under changing circumstances. It is for this reason that both the
"background material" for the plan and the General Development Plan itself are included in this
planning report. The first section covers the plan giving specific recommendations on how to
guide development in Erie Township, based on present knowledge of the Township .
The second section of the report is the Basis of the Plan for Erie Township, it contains the
background data that forms the basis of the plan. It shows what the Township is like, and
indicates what limitations the Erie Township environment puts on development. It gives the
reasons for particular recommendations made in the General Development Plan, and it contains
the information Township residents will need to reevaluate the plan.
There is also an Appendix to this report, following the Basis of the Plan for Erie Township . The
Appendix contains technical information on the natural environment of the Township which is
more detailed and is intended to provide technical information from which a deeper
understanding of Township geology and vegetation can be obtained .
Township residents reading this report should recognize that there are some factors affecting Erie
Township which the Township is not in a position to control. The Township must rely on the
state, for instance, to pass legislation protecting farmland from development pressures . It must
rely on the county for certain kinds of help in installing sanitary sewers. The General
Development Plan has, therefore, had to take into account different ways in which a single event
might occur. It calls for one pattern of development if sanitary sewers are installed in the
Township, for instance, and for another pattern if such sewers are not installed. This may seem
vague, but it is the most appropriate approach in light of the Township's limited control over
certain decisions.

2

��7

4

�COMMUN ITV GOALS
During the planning process, the people of Erie Township identified several major goals to guide
development planning for their community. The goals were developed over a period of time as
residents came to understand the Township, its problems, and the limits imposed by the human
and natural environment on efforts to solve those problems. Most of these goals can be achieved
by careful planning and by implementation of development guidelines. Some goals will be easier
to achieve than others, though, and some will have to be balanced against each other in particular
situations.
The community goals presented here were established upon the attitudes and desires of the
residents of Erie Township. Questionnaires, surveys and public meetings were utilized by the
Planning Commission to obtain the community's wants and aims. Many meetings were held by
the Planning Commission discussing the wording and final determination of the following
community goals:
a.

To make planning a local community effort to control the Township's own destiny, rather
than submitting to county, regional, or state control.

b.

To create a pleasing environment for living in Erie Township with a variety of housing types
for all tastes and incomes, taking into account environmental limitations on building and the
slow growth projected for the community.

c.

To preserve farming as the main industry in the Township, and to protect the Township's
rural atmosphere.

d. To use tax dollars efficiently by avoiding duplication of services, and to put government on a
sound financial basis.
e.

To orient community expansion in an east/west direction around the Township Center of
Erie and around the subdivisions along Halfway Creek, and to otherwise discourage scattered
development.

f.

To creatively utilize the Township's historic and natural resources in accordance with their
character and adaptability.

g.

To consolidate commercial services where a demand for them already exists, rather than
allowing businesses to develop in scattered spots or strips.

h. To allow industrial growth where it will least conflict with surrounding land uses, and where
public utilities will be most readily available.

i.

To restrict future development along the Lake Erie shoreline and in the floodplain to
water-related and/or f load-proofed uses.

5

�Methods of achieving some of the goals are apparent, but others may be accomplished in
unexpected ways. One efficient use of tax dollars, for instance, is to discourage scattered
development. Development concentrated in a few areas can be served more efficiently by water
lines, sewers, postal service, and even by police and fire departments. Future development should
also be planned for areas where sewer lines can be installed inexpensively near existing
development. Other indirect ways to achieve community goals also exist.

SUMMARY
The General Development Plan identifies three landscape zones in Erie Township, based on the
natural and man-made features . These three landscape zones are located in different parts of the
Township; they look different from each other, and they are suitable for different kinds of
development. For the most part, the plan calls for characteristics of the three zones to be
preserved and emphasized . The plan also uses the three landscape zones as the basis for further
subdivision into five planning districts.
The five planning districts are based on the natural and man-made environment in Erie Township,
social and economic trends, and the goals expressed by the local community. The planning
districts serve mostly to concentrate development in certain parts of the Township and
discourage it in other parts. The purpose is to allow growth only where the environment is
suitable for it and where it will not conflict with other more valuable uses of the land.
For growth to take place in Erie Township, certain investments in public facilities will need to be
made . The plan suggests necessary investments and establishes priorities among them. The plan
also deals with the implementation of development guidelines, covering four ways in which
planning recommendations can be turned into Township realities. In doing so, it describes certain
duties of the Township Board and the Planning Commission in this process.
Finally, design and development guidelines for the Township Center of Erie and the Halfway
Creek area are treated in somewhat greater detail. These guidelines are presented in the form of
sketches and diagrams to describe their potential.

6

�SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
TWO FAMILY RES IDENTIAL
HOMESTEAD

..

COMMERCIAL
IND USTRIAL
PARKS, RECREATION, RESERVES
PUBLIC AND QUASI-PLIIUC

[=:J

AGRICUl TUPAL AND VACANT

□ill""l

SCHOOL

ELECTRIC
GAS - TRUNK LINE
GAS- LOCAL
WATfl
G=d
Island

:

·--

I

«

8UUED TELEPHONE CABLE

Norfll Cape

nd

TRANSPORTATION (ROADS)
-

REGIONAL
LOCAL COLLECTOR
SECONDARY

~

MAN-BUILT FEATURES

1 Mlle

7

�r

LANDSCAPE ZONES
Erie Township is divided by natural patterns and by transportation networks into three broad but
distinct zones. Each zone, as outlined on the adjoining landscape map, has its own landscape;
each is set off from the others by a major highway or highways, and each has a different potential
for development.

Zone I lies in the northwest corner of the Township, to the west of Telegraph Road and to the
north of Temperance Road. This area is mostly agricultural, with a gently rolling landscape that is
found nowhere else in the Township. Zone I also has more trees than any other part of the
Township, and it has soils which, with certain limitations, are suitable for development utilizing
septic tank faci Iities.
Zone II lies largely between the 1-75 Expressway and Telegraph Road in the Township. This is a
very flat zone, and it is dominated by major highways, railroads, and transmission lines which
cross the Township diagonally. Buildings in this zone appear as major landmarks when seen
against the background of the flat, seemingly endless landscape.
Although most of the area in this zone is used agriculturally, it also contains the Township Center
of Erie, several school complexes, and a natural area around Halfway Creek. It is within this zone
that the Township could adopt several different patterns of development. Soils here are not
suitable for septic tank operations, but public sewer systems brought into this area would allow
development to occur.

Zone 111 lies east of the 1-75 Expressway and is dominated by the shoreline of Lake Erie. This is a
wet, marshy zone, located mostly within the Lake Erie floodplain. The organic soils here are not
suited for septic tank operation, and require foundations to be of special design. Also, nearly the
entire area is occasionally flooded by Lake Erie. Very little development can or should occur in
this zone.
What is the importance of these zones? Why include them in the plan? First, they indicate some
natural limits for development, and suggest kinds of development which are appropriate for
different areas. Also, the three landscape zones represent a natural resource of the Township - a
visual natural resource. Properly managed, they can break up the monotony experienced by the
Township resident or traveler entering the Township from the north or south_ Instead of a
constant, uniform landscape the Township can express its sharp contrasts: wild, empty marshland
along the Lake Erie shoreline; a flat sweep of rich farmland in the heart of the Township; a quiet
historic community in the Township Center of Erie; rolling countryside covered with a green
canopy of trees in the northwest corner of the Township.

8

�9

�In order to do this, the plan calls for the preservation of the orchards and woodlots in Zone I.
These trees not only protect birds and wildlife, they also set off this area from Zone 11. In the
second zone, the plan calls for development, which is now scattered along the sides of highways
to be concentrated in two planning districts, leaving the rest of the zone for farming. In Zone 111,
the plan calls for development to be restricted with only water related recreation allowed to be
developed. Most of the zone will be left in its natural state.
To discuss development and restrictions on development, it is necessary to examine the five
planning districts called for by the plan.

PLANNING DISTRICTS
The General Development Plan divides Erie Township into five planning districts. These include
one agricultural planning district and one shoreland/wetland planning district, which are to be
preserved for open space uses, and three districts in which various sorts of development will be
encouraged. The five planning districts are shown on the accompanying map.
The boundaries of these districts were not arrived at by accident. To a large extent they retlect
the boundaries of the landscape zones, which is to say they reflect the natural features of Erie
Township. Also, they reflect patterns of existing development in the Township, community goals
and social and economic trends in the area.
Planning District A has about the same boundaries as Landscape Zone I, lying in the northwest
corner of the Township. This district is unlike every other part of the Township in that some of
the soils here are suitable for septic tank operation. For this reason, residential development in
the Township should be encouraged in this district, even before public sanitary sewers are
available to the Township. Development must proceed carefully, however. Only 30% of the soils
here are suitable for septic tanks, and in some places, where the soil is sandy and bedrock lies
within three feet of the soil surface, septic tanks are likely to pollute the groundwater of th'e area.
Therefore, development in this district should proceed, but only on an individual review and
permit basis. Each site must be tested for suitability for septic tank operation before a permit is
issued.

The irregular pattern of soils in this district suggest the logic of cluster development. Residential
clusters can fit more appropriately than other patterns into a landscape otherwise used for
agriculture. The woodlots and orchards in this district represent a visual resource for the entire
Township and should be preserved. Creeks in this district need protection from pollution. They
feed into larger streams which flow through the rest of the Township and which, if polluted, will
harm the quality of life for people in districts downstream.
10

�RAUC/1 RD

i,'_~ .....

\l~ ~ (.':~\ r,l _,ij

I,

~--

L--- ;:~-,J

- -_ -

- - - -&amp;,
,.~. ~

!\ ",

......

___

Y of LUNA PIER

11-':
h,_

~

.,, :,

i
mm
p-

LAKE

ERIE

\
'

. -Ntxfll Moum•, Bey

.,.

·

)

jJ~~=~~f')~; ';
Indian lsklnd
V

(,

\J') \

~
~, ~ l l \
'- / \

~

"°'"

'(:.,

I

I

PLANNING DISTRICTS
11

�Commercial development already exists in Planning District A, in the form of three commercial
facilities along Telegraph Road north of M-151. Additional commercial facilities should be
concentrated into a small "commercial zone" so an increase in the number of access points to
Telegraph Road can be avoided. This will reduce conflict between cars entering or exiting the
highway and through traffic on Telegraph Road, resulting in increased safety.

Planning District B, one of three planning districts within Landscape Zone 11, is located in the
southern part of the Township along Halfway Creek. Soils here are not suitable for septic tank
operation, but development should still be encouraged in this district after public sanitary sewers
have been installed. Although the district, along with the others in Landscape Zone II, is located
on some of the better agricultural soils in Michigan, there are several reasons for recommending
its development. First, it already contains two subdivisions along Halfway Creek, scattered
commercial buildings along Dixie Highway, South Mason Consolidated Elementary School, and a
small mobile home park. Second, Planning District B lies directly in the path of urbanization
extending northward from Toledo and will experience its growth pressures. Third, development
can be concentrated in this district, leaving the land north of Benore Road free for agriculture .
Finally, and most important, it is likely that public sewer service will be extended into this area
from Bedford Township and possibly from Toledo.

The plan recommends that sewer service from the Bedford Township sewage treatment plant be
extended initially to the area south of Sterns Road and west of the Penn Central railroad where
additional residential development should begin.
Later, when the sewer line is extended eastward across the Penn Central railroad tracks,
residential development can occur around the elementary school and in the area around Halfway
Creek. The Sterns Road/Benore Road area should mark the northern boundary of this residential
development.
Some commercial development is possible in Planning District B, though growth trends in Erie
Township do not indicate a great need in this regard . As the population grows, however, the
development of "convenience" shopping faci Iities in this district cou Id serve nearby
neighborhoods. The commercial development should be consolidated into one or a few areas,
rather than being scattered along major highways.

12

�Industrial development is also proposed primarily in the southwestern part of the Township at
two separate locations. One of the proposed industrial areas is located west of Hagman Road,
south of Halfway Creek, east of the Penn Central railroad tracks, and north of the State Line.
The other area proposed for industrial development is located west of Dixie Highway, south of
Benore Road, extended west of Dixie Highway to the Chesapeake and Ohio (C &amp; 0) railroad
tracks, and east of the C &amp; 0 tracks and the west line of the Township. Further expansion of
industrial uses north of Benore Road to Little Lake Creek can be allowed when the areas above
approach complete development or if it can be demonstrated that the entire parcel up to Little
Lake Creek can be developed as a unit. A small area of industrial development is contained in the
General Development Plan located to the northwest of the Township Center at the northeast
corner of the intersection of Telegraph Road and Erie Road.
As development occurs in Planning District B, however, the Township will have to add certain
community facilities such as streets and parks. A public safety building is proposed in the vicinity
of Sterns Road and Suder Avenue to serve existing and future development. At the same time,
highway improvements should be undertaken to strengthen the east/west orientation of growth
along Halfway Creek .

Planning District C, also within Landscape Zone II, extends eastward from the Township Center
of Erie along Erie Road and Bay Creek to Summit Street. Because soils restrict septic tanks in
this district also, development should occur only after public sanitary facilities are installed.
Development in this district is recommended because both the Township Center of Erie and the
Mason School complex are located here. Development related to them provides a focus for life in
the entire Township. Also, the recent construction of highway interchanges at the I-75
Expressway and Luna Pier Road, and at the 1-75 Expressway and Erie Road, creates a potential
growth corridor running in an east/west direction paralleling a community goal to encourage
east/west development in the Township . Public sanitary sewer service to this area from the City
of Luna Pier may be possible in the future .
Once public sewers are installed, residential growth in this district should be encouraged around
the Township Center of Erie and around the Mason School complex. Some commercial activity
should accompany it with convenience shopping facilities concentrated within the Township
Center of Erie and highway-related service facilities within a highway service area near the Luna
Pier Road interchange of 1-75 Expressway.

13

�The Township should work to develop the Township Center of Erie as a focus for life in this
district. Its historic buildings and street pattern should be preserved. Setbacks should be required
along the streets and planted with trees. Erie Road should be narrowed between Telegraph Road
and Summit Street, sidewalks should be installed, and traffic should be rerouted to the south
around the Township Center . Every opportunity to make the Township Center a place attractive
for people to live and walk in should be pursued .
One such opportunity to increase the quality of life in the Township Center is to preserve and
expand the natural area around Bay Creek . Eventually, a park system could be developed to
provide a cool , shady area of natural beauty as a focus for the Township Center and enhance its
environment. The park system should not be confined to the Township Center of Erie, but
should wind along Bay Creek and provide a green walkway spanning east/west the width of
Planning District C.
In order to prevent traffic congestion and parking problems in this district, parking facilities in
the Township Center will need to be supplemented. Locations are suggested next to the
Township Hall and behind the commercial property on Dixie Highway .

14

�...

.r, - , 1-- I
~
I
-~

1{

l

~

i

JI

15

�The Agricultural Planning District is the third planning district located in Landscape Zone 11 .
Good soils and a long growing season combine to make this district one of the most attractive
locations for agricultural production in Michigan. It is the policy of the Comprehensive
Development Plan to preserve this area for agricultural use. Other types of development in this
district are discouraged and directed, instead, into Planning Districts A, B and C with
recommended public sewer facilities.

Within the Agricultural District, residential development should be restricted to homes on lots of
20 acres or more. Industrial and commercial development should be prohibited . However, it is
intended, under the plan, that a land owner in the district may convey a parcel less than 20 acres
to one or more of his children for their residential use. Sites of 20 acreas or more will not prevent
future subdividing of land for homesites when sanitary sewers are available . These 20 acre sites
are large enough for agricultural uses. Since soils here are generally unsuitable for septic tank
operation, an·d since no public sewer is planned for this district in the near future, it is doubtful
that much residential development can occur here, even on large lots. Farmers in this district
should be encouraged to take advantage of new tax legislation, only recently passed by the
Legislature, which allows agricultural land to be taxed preferentially- as opposed to residential,
commercial or industrial land. This can reduce tax pressures on farmers to sell agricultural land
for development. Other legislation now pending may help the Township in other ways to preserve
agricultural land.
A major community goal is to preserve farming as a way of life within the Township. This is still
another reason to guard against development in the Agricultural Planning District.

16

�New residential development maintaining rural character

~R'N l&amp;D pr;, '&lt;'.~!::Aj!ON Ce:

r 13Pe}'YAeo M,

,.,..e.e. - -,~-r-5 t

Bl7 ~

Ai- CPl:J-.l q",ACE
1.iE.w 'lot-'!½ · L•t-161-e: OR
~e.J..i

~ow .

'

,, ,SPL,/~ I-All-~
:if\tJfE:I? 10
:;,cve.t.cp• ·EN 5o..il-l1T$ ofi!: I.II~ /Aa$,)

.. .-·.

..

·-

•

•

Pt'1'EMTIAL PeVELRMe.n1-l!:#! C~61t-lAt.. F~~~iT~
C.Afi ACH!t::v~ t.$ MN-Ir t.iv;E ~· rs ,~1:£ c,,-..c.wy.iG te6
~t;, ~ f-l A ...'l'l&gt;IC,.!L, P.;te..Cf'Vl!:. tj: i4US, Ko~
U.f..v CA~ ~E ap fOt R!Sll:V'.flON AHD t6~1C t:r 'R=..

Cl.JJ$~ OF NB!v' f+~~ Qt,l C~

17

�The Shoreland/Wetland Planning District has about the same boundaries as Landscape Zone 111
and lies entirely to the east of 1-75 along the Lake Erie shoreline. Organic soils in this district are
poor for holding building foundations; septic tanks endanger the district's water quality, and the
area is flooded periodically by Lake Erie . For these and other reasons, nearly all kinds of
development should be prohibited in this district. The Shoreland/Wetland Planning District can
be of benefit, however, not only to Erie Township, but to the entire state of Michigan. The
General Development Plan calls for this district to be developed as a water recreation area serving
southeastern Michigan and northern Ohio.
Because much of the district is already contained in a private hunting club and a State Game
Preserve, a basis for a regional recreation area already exists. Other public and private land in the
district can also be converted to recreation uses. While most of the district should remain
undeveloped, a limited amount of commercial development to serve water recreation purposes
and housed in buildings which will suffer little damage from flooding, is appropriate . Marine
supply stores, boat repair services, and similar businesses are examples. Care will need to be
exercised to assure that commercial development does not pollute the water resource.
There is a small area in the Shoreland/Wetland Planning District, located along Substation Road
and Bay Creek Road - east of the 1-75 Expressway, which is not wholly within the Lake Erie
floodplain . While this land might be considered to be adaptable for residential development, the
land is cut off from the rest of the Township by the 1-75 Expressway and it would be inefficient
and expensive to supply it with sewer services, water, and other public facilities . This land clearly
relates to the rest of the Shoreland/Wetland Planning District and should be governed by the
same development guidelines.
There are a number of areas such as "Lost Peninsula," "McLeary's Point" and "Moraine Point"
which contain residential development. Portions of these areas lie within Lake Erie's floodplain.
Accordingly, the plan intends that concentrations of existing residential structures be permitted
to remain. The plan intends that improvements and additions must be protected to prevent flood
damage. In case of disaster, rebuilding of the structures must be subject to floodplain restrictions.
The plan also intends that additional residential development not be encouraged in these areas.
The preservation of this district may increase tourism in Erie Township in the not-too-distant
future. As pollution in Lake Erie is cleaned up, and the Lake becomes safer for human contact,
this district will have more and more value as a recreation area. The district also contains natural
features which deserve to be protected in their own right These, then, are the five planning
districts and the development guidelines for them. The Township's role in translating these
guidelines into reality is described in the two following sections dealing with investments in
public facilities and the implementation of development guidelines.
18

��INVESTMENTS IN PUBLIC FACILITIES
As development proceeds in Erie Township and population growth occurs, the Township will
need to make certain investments in public facilities to serve its people. The General
Development Plan identifies Township investment in transportation facilities, public sanitary
sewers, an additional Township public safety building, new schools and parks .
Transportation investments should be anticipated according to the Major Street Plan on the
accompanying page. This Plan contains most of the features of the Monroe County
Transportation Plan for the Township with some changes proposed as follows :
a.

Temperance Road should be extended as a county primary road eastward from Telegraph
Road across the Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad right-of-way to Dixie Highway and connect
with its eastern portion;

b.

Traffic should be rerouted to the south of Erie Road around the Township Center of Erie , so
that Erie Road between Telegraph Road and Summit Street will be fairly narrow and free of
through traffic; and

c.

Summit Street should be improved where it joins the ramp off 1-75.

The first priority for Township investment in transportation, though, is to expand the
establishment of setbacks along streets designated on the Major Street Plan . The width of these
setbacks is indicated on the Major Street Plan map. Interstate highways, for instance, should have
a 300 to 350 foot right-of-way; that is the highway itself, its shoulders, and the land in public
ownership on both sides of the highway should measure 300 to 350 feet, from one side to
another.
Similarly, rights-of-way along U.S. and Michigan Highways should measure 150 to 204 feet and
120 feet along county primary roads, 86 feet on collector roads and that street rights-of-way in
the Township Center of Erie should be 66 feet wide. This does not mean, of course, that
buildings will be able to be placed right at the edge of the public rights-of-way. The Township
should have ordinances requiring buildings to be set back specific distances from the right-of-way
line.
It is worth noting that the
existence. The Township
widths, rather than those
Proposed rights-of-way also
20

proposed rights-of-way are much wider than the rights-of-way now in
should require development to respect the proposed right-of-way
existing on lots along major streets and roads in the Township.
need to be correlated with existing conditions wherever feasible .

�LAKE

ERIE

PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY

WIDTH

-

INTEJtSTATEHIGHWAYS

(300-350')

-

U.S.&amp;. MICHIGAN HIGHWAYS

(1.50-204')

-

coUNTYPRIMARYROAOS

_ _ _ CQLLECTORR™-DS

•• •••••• TOWN CENTER

_ _ _ ,.o,oSEO

(120'+)
(86')

(66')
(120' +)

~

�Public sanitary sewer investments will have a major effect on how fast development will proceed

in Erie Township . The General Development Plan calls for the first sanitary sewers to be installed
in Planning Districts Band C. The public water line should also serve these districts. Basic designs
for these two systems already ex ist.
An additional Township Public Safety Building should be planned to serve residents of Planning
District B, who are not adequately served by existing public safety facilities in the Township
Center of Erie. Containing a fire and possibly a police station, it should be located near the
intersection of Suder Avenue and Sterns Road near the Halfway Creek residential area. A possible
site is along the Hooper Run Drain on Suder Avenue where the building will be well situated and
the banks of the Hooper Run Drain will be preserved and protected in public ownership . This
building is to replace the Morin Point Fire Station which will not be able to meet development
needs and which is flooded from time to time. Other community facilities, such as public meeting
and emergency shelter, could be included in the Public Safety Building, transforming it into a
Township Community Building for Planning District B.
Although schools in the Township will have to be expanded as the population grows, the land on
which the present schools are located is sufficient for future needs. Educational consultants and
school officials can indicate where new buildings and additions to existing buildings should be
placed on existing school land .
Parks in the Township are currently inadequate and will have to be greatly expanded to meet

future needs. A community of 4,500 people needs a total of 35.5 acres of recreation land. About
18 of these acres should support "passive" recreation (walking, picnicking, etc .) and the
remaining 17.5 acres should be for "active" recreation (sports and active games) .
Erie Township has a population in excess of 4,500: the 1970 census counted 4,494 people and
the population has grown since . Yet the Township has only 28 acres of developed and
programmed recreation land out of a total of 43.5 acres of public park land according to the
Monroe County Recreational Land Acreage Survey . The play areas around the elementary
schools add some recreation space to this total, but the Township still needs to expand its parks
to serve its future population adequately. The need for extra recreation land will become even
greater, of course, as the Township population increases . It can be argued that the
Shoreland/Wetland Planning District will provide more than enough recreation land for Erie
Township. But people - especially young people - need recreation land near their own
neighborhoods where they can walk to it. The Shoreland/Wetland Planning District serves a
regional need for recreation and cannot adequately satisfy local recreation needs.

22

�•

Township Hall

~ Mason Elementary

'.ulJ
C,
LAK.

Middle &amp; High School

Elementary School

F/;-IJ:.

■

Generating Plant

0

Fire Station

m

Sewage Treatment

-···- Electric
-··- Buried Telephone Cable
- - Gas-Local
- · - Existing Water Line
--- Proposed Water Line

23

�One partial answer to the Township's recreation needs would involve land along primary drains
and streams in the Township. The General Development Plan recommends that this land be
developed into long, strip-like parks . If extensive enough, they will more than satisfy the
Township's "passive" recreation needs and serve another purpose, too. By providing open space
on each side of major streams, they will reduce the rate of surface run-off into those streams
following rain storms keeping the streams from filling so rapidly with water and helping to
prevent floods. The "extra" passive recreation land produced by this park system will be of
benefit in a variety of ways.

24

�IMPLEMENTATION OF PLANNING GUIDELINES
There are four major ways in which the Township can implement the planning guidelines of the
General Development Plan:

1. Township government can adopt policies for development which reflect the development
plan;

2. Land use regulations and controls (e.g. Mobile Home Park Ordinance, Zoning Ordinance) can
reflect the purposes of the plan;

3.

The Capital Improvement Program and Budget can be drawn up in accordance with the plan
and made part of the annual Township budget; and

4. Private groups and individuals can work to implement the plan.
Following a description of these four types of implementation, the role of the Planning
Commission in the implementation process is reviewed.

1. Development policies are those policies which should be adopted by the Township Board and
the Planning Commission in order to carry out the recommendations of the plan. Both the
Planning Commission and the Township Board will need to make many decisions on development
ordinances, individual requests for action, and other matters which directly affect physical
development in the Township. General development policies will make these decisions easier to
make.
First, the Board and the Planning Commission should adopt neighborhood residential policies to
guide development. Some suggested policies are as follows:

a.

Until sanitary sewers are installed in the Township, residential development will - be
encouraged only in the northwest corner of the Township, in Planning District A. Building
permits will be issued here only after analysis of the soil shows that each site is suited for
septic tank operation.

b. Once sanitary sewers are installed, residential development will be encouraged in Planning
Districts B and C, and discouraged in the Agricultural and Shoreland/Wetland Planning
districts.
c.

Residential neighborhoods in Planning Districts B and C will receive first priority in terms of
water distribution, sewer service, and other residential services.

25

�d.

High priority will be given to developing parks to serve these two community planning
districts (Halfway Creek-Erie Tmvnship Center), and the Township will acquire easements
and property for that purpose.

e.

New streets developed to serve residential neighborhoods will be designed to discourage
through traffic.

f.

The Township will do everything feasible to encourage the development of the community
planning districts (Halfway Creek and Erie Township Center) areas as social and recreational
units and encourage people in these communities to form associations dedicated to improving
living conditions in the neighborhoods.

g.

The Township will develop and adopt a subdivision ordinance which permits clustered
residential development. Also, the Township will update the zoning ordinance to include
specific districts for multi-family housing developments, mobile home development, cluster
housing, and a shoreland/wetland planning district.

h.

In order to keep the residential zoning _
ordinances up-to-date, the Planning Commission will
review all ordinances affecting neighborhood development. It will make sure that they
incorporate the most progressive and modern methods for achieving the goals of the General
Development Plan, and it will recommend any needed changes to the Township Board .

i.

The Township will continue to mount a Township-wide attack on blighted buildings. It will
act to remove deteriorated and abandoned · buildings wherever they occur, and will use code
enforcement, neighborhood citizen action and private redevelopment to prevent blight.

A typical township residential development with public sewer and water facilities (not located in Erie Township).

26

�The Planning Commission and the Township Board should adopt commercial development

policies and agricultural development policies as fol lows:
a.

Residential, commercial and industrial development will be discouraged in the Agricultural
Planning District .

b. The Township will encourage farmers to take advantage of tax incentives established by the
Michigan Legislature to aid in preserving agricultural areas.
c.

The Township will encourage a limited amount of commercial development in two highway
service areas: one located at the Luna Pier interchange of 1-75 Expressway, the other located
at an appropriate site on the west side of U.S. 24 (Telegraph Road) north of Erie Road. These
service areas may contain gasoline stations, drive-in restaurants, and other businesses serving
highway traffic.

d. The Township will encourage a limited amount of commercial development in community
service areas in Planning Districts A, B, and C. Drug stores, hardware stores, grocery stores,
and similar businesses will be permitted in these areas.
e.

The Township will encourage a limited amount of commercial development in the
Shoreland/Wetland Planning District to serve people engaged in water recreation in this
district.

f.

All of the codes and ordinances shall be administered in these areas to provide appropriate
setbacks, avoid traffic congestion, and preserve the visual quality of the area. Businesses will
be required to have signs which fit in with the visual environment, and unsightly buildings or
activities will be screened from view.

2. Land use regulations and controls, such as the Mobile Home Park Ordinance and the Zoning
Ordinance, represent still another way in which the Township can implement the plan. Zoning is
probably the major type of land use regulation for this purpose. There are two major changes
which should be made in the Township's zoning ordinance.
First, the present zoning map should be changed to conform with the five planning districts
proposed by the General Development Plan. Residential, commercial and industrial zoning should
be confined to Planning Districts A, B, and C, and should be located in accordance with the plans
as indicated above. Also, an Agricultural Zoning District and a Shoreland/Wetland Zoning District
should be established in accordance with the plan.

27

�The second major change in the zoning ordinance involves the abolition of "cumulative" zoning,
which permits "higher" zoning uses in "lower" zoning areas . In this way conflicting land uses can
become established side by side, to the detriment of aesthetic and land values . One means of
insuring the character and quality of development is to utilize a site plan review process in the
revised zoning ordinance. Other changes in the ordinance will be necessary to resolve
inconsistencies and remedy inadequacies. The Township will probably want to make these
changes gradually, rather than all at once. Three phases of change are recommended:

Phase I would consist of immediate revision of the zoning map based on the General
Development Plan as adopted by the Planning Commission and the Township Board. During this
initial phase, basic revisions in the zoning ordinance text should be made, a Shoreland/Wetland
district should be added, and other revisions as necessary. This phase should begin immediately.

Phase II would change the zoning over the next five years. These changes are harder to predict
than those in Phase I, but many are likely to evolve from individual requests for zoning changes .
Zoning changes which "fit" with the plan should be approved; those which go against it should
be denied. For example, a request to change zoning in a residential area from commercial to
residential should be granted, while in the Agricultural Zone, a change from agricultural usage to
commercial should be denied . The net effect of many small decisions on zoning changes,
correctly made, will be to strengthen the plan.

Phase Ill includes zoning changes to be made after five years. Even harder to predict than those
in Phase 11, these changes depend on population growth and might best be postponed until
stage. Commercial development, for instance, is not currently in Planning District B, but
become necessary when the population in that district has increased considerably . Thus,
district should not be zoned for commercial uses until after the population growth has begun
the area can support the proper kinds of businesses.

this
will
the
and

Whenever possible, Township zoning ordinances should be developed in coordination with those
of the Monroe County Planning Commission. Common forms, common standards, and common
terminology should be utilized . Township zoning should also be in harmony with the zoning
practices of Bedford Township, LaSalle Township and the City of Luna Pier, so long as it is
consistent with the General Development Plan.

28

�3. The Capital Improvements Program and Budget will enable the Township to plan for needed
public improvements and pay for them with proper financing methods.
"Capital improvements" are generally defined as permanent improvements which have a value of
more than $5,000 and a life of more than 15 or 20 years. A "capital improvement program" is a
program for capital improvements to be undertaken over a period of five years and contains
annual budget projections.
The capital improvement budget, in turn, should be part of the annual Township budget adopted
by the Township Board. Each capital improvement budget should contain (a) a description of
different capital improvement projects, arranged according to priority; (b) a statement of the
basic reasons for each project and its priority; and (c) a statement of the amount each project will
cost, and of how it will be financed. Many important ·capital improvements in the Township will
be made by the County or the State with little Township control over them. But there are several
kinds of improvements the Township can determine. When considering these, the Township
should give priority to those which affect Pl,;mning District A, Planning District B around the
Halfway Creek settlement, and Planning District C, especially around the Township Center of
Erie. The following kinds of improvements should receive priority:
a.

Street improvements including right-of-way acquisitions and street tree plantings, especially

in the Township Center.
b. Improvement of the drainage areas and acquisition of park land along creeks and streams such
as Bay Creek. This can be done through purchase of land and/or easement rights.
c.

Sanitary sewer installation in Planning Districts Band C. The Township should negotiate with
the County and with Bedford Township over sewer service for Planning District B, and with
the City of Luna Pier over sewer service for Planning Districts A and C.

d.

Continuing expansion of water distribution in the Township.

e.

Land acquisition for, and later construction of, a new public safety building (fire station,
police station and community house) somewhere near the intersection of Sterns Road and

f.

Summit Street,
Acquisition of land for additional parking facilities in the Township Center next to the
Township Hall and behind the commercial property on Dixie Highway, and the paving and
landscaping of these parking facilities.

29

�4. Private groups and individuals can also help turn the General Development Plan into a reality
for Erie Township Both groups and individuals can read the plan carefully, work for its adoption
by the Township Board and the Planning Commission, and tailor private plans for development
to follow its guidelines.

The role of the Planning Commission 1n implementing the plan is a unique one . The Planning
Commission should
a.

Annually review the General Development Plan policies and recommend necessary revisions
and additions to the Township Board for formal adoption.

b. Annually prepare a prior ity list ing of proposed cap ital improvements, based on the
Township's fiscal year. This capital improvements program has been described above and
should be presented to the Township Board for inclusion in the Township's annual budget.

30

c.

Develop a standard approach for reviewing petitions to rezone areas of the Township , and
standard procedures for reviewing subdivision plans presented by developers. It would be
helpful to develop check sheets for these processes. Also, the Planning Commission should
expand its coordination with the Monroe County Planning Comm ission in this regard, and
should continue to utilize its staff.

d.

The Planning Commission should explore different ways to finance development and capital
improvements in Erie Township. State, federal, and private programs for financing should all
be explored.

e.

T he Planning Commission should develop and carry out a continuing education program for
citizens to acquaint them with planning matters in Erie Township .

�DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
The following policy plans and sketches present development guidelines for the Township Center
and for the Halfway Creek area in somewhat greater detail. Wh il e these development guidelines
need not be followed precisely, they portray the general character that the Township can achieve
in its development.

TOTAL

ACRES
EXIST.

SINGLE FAMILY
MULTI-FAMILY
PARK OPEN SPACE
INDUSTRY

60

FUTURE

45
54
23
3

ERIE TOWNSHIP CENTER

31

�ERIE TOWNSHIP CENTER

32

�TOTAL EXISTING

Fl1'URE

w

::,

z

w

&gt;

&lt;

A

TOTAL EXISTING
FUTURE

□

"'w

0

::,

&lt;I)

HALF. WAY CREEK

33

�This, then is the Erie Township General Development Plan. The basis for the plan and the reasons
behind its many recommendations are reported in the next section, The Basis of The Plan for
Erie T ownsh ip.
A full color version of this Plan is included at the back of the report.

34

�LAKE

~

ERIE

RESIOENTIAL FLOODPLAIN SPECIAL RESTRICTIONS APPLY

CITY of LUNA PIER

[::=J
c:::::J

-

MOBllE HOMES RESIDENTIAL

SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

MULTI FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL

c:::::J

HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL

c::J
c::J
c:J

PARKS.OPEN SPACE &amp; TREES

[ =::J
[JZJ

C::J

WATER RELATED COMMERCIAL

INDUSTRIAL

AGRICUL TUAAL O FLOOD PLAIN
AGRICULTURAL
LANO AREAS SUITABLE FOR
SEPTIC SYSTEMS
POTENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL REQUIRING
SEWER SYSTEM OR

EXCEPTIONALL V LARGE LOTS

UTILITY LINES ELECTRIC

COMMUNITY FACILITIES BUILDING
MAJOR ROADS

SCtiOOLS

--- -No,111 Moumt1~ Boy

Guard
Jslond

,.,
SI

,..

~$41/o

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

-

~

1 Mile

35

���SUMMARY
Because effective planning for Erie Township must be based on a thorough understanding of the
Township itself, the General Development Plan is based on this survey. It attempts to collect all
the relevant facts about Erie Township in a single document. An understanding of these facts is
necessary to any adjustment in the General Development Plan.
The survey covers several sets of facts relating to Erie Township. It examines the regional context
of the Township, community goals expressed during the planning process, social and economic
trends, the special place of agriculture in the Township, the natural environment of the
Township, and the human (or man-bu i It) environment. Because al I of these factors , have an
influence on development in Erie Township, all must be considered during the planning process.
The Basis of The Plan for Erie Township also includes a brief discussion of several different
planning strategies. The General Development Plan combines these, but the emphasis upon one or
another strategy may want to be altered in the future. The strengths and weaknesses of the
different strategies also need to be taken into account during the planning process.
There are some facts about Township geology and vegetation which are not included in The Basis
of The Plan because they have a more direct bearing on Township development and planning.
These are included in the Appendix to provide a slightly more technical discussion of some
aspects of the natural environment.

39

�REGIONAL CONTEXT
Erie Township, the "Gateway to Michigan," is a small rural area caught up in the forces generated
by two large metropolitan areas and a Great Lake . The Township is greatly influenced by Toledo,
Ohio, which is directly to the south; by Detroit and Monroe, to the north; and by Lake Erie, to
the east. One concern in se1ting forth guidelines for development is to meet Township goals and
needs while at the same time aiding the Township in fulfilling its regional role . Toledo is probably
the most important regional force affecting Erie Township. The Township depends on Toledo to
meet most of its shopping needs and to provide employment for its people . The Township is a
member of the Toledo Metropolitan Council of Governments and is considered by the U.S.
Census to be a part of the Toledo Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area. Toledo's influence also
creates problems for the Township. Its growth pressures have spilled over into Erie Township,
resulting in scattered residential development on land better suited for agriculture. Other
development has occurred in the Lake Erie floodplain, causing serious problems during high
water flood periods.
Detroit is important to the Township primarily because it forms one end of a transportation
corridor running through it connecting Detroit to Toledo . Three major highways, five railroads,
and several gas and electric lines run across the Township diagonally from northeast to southwest
cutting the Township into thin strips. Isolated from each other, their pattern is in opposition to
east/west development, including the electrical transmission lines leading west of the Consumers
Power Company generating station in Luna Pier . Strip development occurs along the major
highways creating further problems for the Township .
Lake Erie influences the Township especially during high water periods, when east winds cause
lake water to flood land along the shoreline.

40

�1

;'

;'
__/'

_

Lake

Lake

REGIONAL CONTEXT

St.Clair

Erie

41

�SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC TRENDS
In order to plan for the future of Erie Township, an understanding of its past and present and the
ways in which it is changing is necessary. This section examines Township history, growth trends
and economic trends .
Township History

Erie Township is consistently characterized in history as a rural, lightly settled area. Agriculture
and transportation have nearly always been important in the Township while trade and
commerce have usually been insignificant At one time there was a chance that the Township
might develop into a trading area, but the settling of a boundary dispute between Michigan and
Ohio in 1835 dashed the hopes of local businessmen, and agriculture remained the dominant
industry. Historical forces have also destined the Township to be severed by transportation
corridors connecting Detroit and Toledo . Erie Township was first the home of the Wyandot
Indians, a sub-group of the Huron tribe. French explorers arrived sometime after 1671 when
France claimed all the territory around the Great Lakes and were followed by French settlers
from Quebec. The French settled near Lake Erie and its tributary streams and depended on the
lake and the lush, inland forest for their food and shelter.
The French lost the area to the British in 1763 after the French and Indian War . The British in
turn relinquished the area to the Americans during the American Revolution. About 1790, the
first settlement on Bay Creek was formed.
In 1827, Erie Township was officially created, one of the first five townships organized in
Monroe County by an Act of Congress in that year. By 1828 there were 15 houses near where the
railroad bridge now spans Bay Creek, and small areas of land were under cultivation . Farm fields
became larger and larger as the years passed and as farmers in the Township discovered that the
soil was rich and the growing season long; in fact, some of the finest agricultural land in the state
was located here. There was a period in the early 1800's in which trade and commerce in the
Township promised to become more important than farming. At that time there was an intense
rivalry between Monroe and Toledo over which settlement would be the outlet for trade and
commerce for the eastern Michigan territory. If Monroe had won this contest, it might have
become a great trading center and nearby Erie Township might have shared in its commercial
success. In 1835, however, the settlement of a boundary dispute between Ohio and Michigan gave
all of Maumee Bay except Ottawa Bay to Ohio. Plans to build port and rail facilities in Monroe
fell through and Erie Township remained rural in nature.

42

�..

;

~

... t~ !:..

i;:.~:~:.

z,j § t.'?:
:?i~ j &gt;,! "
f

'z.

~

;l. !

~:;7t~~~t:'··,.s {

-~ ;

.,~ "\

..:.. ?

6

· • .....",_]fi:;,;r-z·:.:'.:~:;~:
:--;:;::;'.";~.:.::.::=:JDI""'- .~

,,t:·:~), ,..
-

·o

'.)/

:

-~~.•.•

~~e .. ~
. ':,;"••r

,lllV•uFJ ....... '\-

43

�Transportation, like agriculture, has always played an important role in Erie Township's history.
Partly because of its marsh land lake shore, which posed problems for development, and partly
because of its location between Monroe and Toledo, the Township has historically been
segmented by ever-increasingly developed transportation routes. Historic trails became roads, and
roads became high-speed expressways. Railroads came to the Township, then electric inter-urban
tracks, and these coa lesced into the main line of the Penn Central Railroad . All of these
transportation routes have run in a north/south direction across the Township dividing it and
preventing development of any sizable dimension from occurring. Sometimes the interference
with Township development was deliberate. In 1856, for instance, when the Detroit, Monroe and
Toledo Railroad track was laid one mile east of the Township Center of Erie, the Michigan
Central Railroad Company found the distance to be inconvenient and tried to establish a rival
community adjacent to the tracks. They constructed a depot and named the spot Vienna, but
nothing further developed on the site except for a combination hotel/tavern/warehouse, also
built by the company.
The Township Center originally "Bay Settlement" was named "Erie" in 1835. It contains the
only significant concentration of development in the Township. Another built-up area, formerly
a part of the Township, is now the City of Luna Pier. Incorporated in 1963, it is now governed
separately from the Township. Historically, there has been a tendency for land holding to
become concentrated in the Township. The State Department of Natural Resources owns a large
amount of land in the State Game Area along the Lake Erie shore, and a private recreation club
also owns a large parcel in this area. Consumers Power Company owns the Whiting Power Plant
and the land under its transmission corridors; the C &amp; 0 Railroad owns 900 acres where terminal
facilities formerly existed; and some families who have been in the Township for several
generations own large parcels of agricultural land.

44

��Growth Trends

For a land area immediately on the edge of a major metropolitan area, Erie Township remains
surprisingly open and sparsely settled. Growth pressures from Toledo do exist, however, and they
will have to be accommodated in the years ahead. Present population predictions call for Erie
Township to experience slow but steady growth over the next several years. I nstal lat ion of sewers
and other public utilities could cause this growth rate to increase dramatically . At present, a
substantial concentration of development within the Township is in the Township Center of Erie.
The rest of the Township is loosely settled with farms and homes scattered along roadways .
There are also a few minor residential subdivisions off Telegraph Road and Dixie Highway, and
within the "Lost Peninsula" extending from Toledo up into Michigan .
The rate of population growth in the Township is low. The last census, in fact, indicated ·that
Township population had declined to 4,494 from 5,546 in 1960. The decrease exists only on
paper, however, in that it was caused by the separation of the City of Luna Pier from the
Township in 1963. It probably conceals the slow growth that may have occurred between 1960
and 1970. A better indication of recent growth can be found in the recent levels of residential
construction in the Township:
1970
1971
1972
1973

16
37
28
30

dwelling
dwelling
dwelling
dwelling

units built
units built
units built
units built

This slow but steady growth is expected to continue, according to population predictions of the
Toledo Metropolitan Area Council of Governments (TMACOG) and the Southeast Michigan
Council of Governments (SEMCOG). The TMACOG projections are as follows :
1975
1980

5,514 people
5,854 people

35 dwelling units built per year
20 dwelling units built per year

Township population growth has already created a population level in 1970 which exceeds the
SEMCOG prediction for 1975. Growth rates are likely to increase even more once public sanitary
sewers are installed in the Township . Sewers usually increase the subdivision of land, thus
creating a greater number of building sites, usually of small size . These smaller sites can be
developed more easily with conventional financing and become more attractive to new families.
The General Development Plan must be sufficiently flexible to accommodate different rates of
growth in the Township .

46

....

�As th e Town ship grows, it will also be necessary to guide its development to meet the needs of
more types of people. Differences in income level, occupation, and language now exist among
Township residents . As the Township grows, it will be necessary to meet these needs.

"'0z
"'a:UJ
0.

10,000, 000
9, 000,000
8,000,000
7, 000, 000

-

~

6,000, 000

r

5,000,000
4,000,000

u..
0

3,000,000

-

.,,,,,..

,.......
-

2,000, 000

a:

UJ
a,

:;;
:::,

z

l, 000,000
900, 000
800, 000
700,000

600,000
S00,000
◄ 00,000

300, 000

200,000

MO~ ROE COL INTY
100, 000
90,000
80,000
70,000

--

L..--

-- ·-

:_-

--- -

f--

60,000

,o.ooo
40, 000

I/'

-

-

BElFOF D UI BAN ZED AR• •·· ...
--:;;..

-

~/

30, 000

20.000

10. 000

~

0

;;:

----

0
M

0

N

-- -

--. --

E.RIE T0' ~~ !f..-

0

0

0

0
0
0

~

~

Source: Bureau of the Cenw1

ERIE TOWNSHIP
POPULATION

CHANGE

Estimate 1: Monroe County Plann ing Commission, 1974

•1oss o f population due to Luna Pier detachment
""includes Bedford, Erie and Whiteford townships

47

�Economic Trends

For a variety of reasons, Erie Township is unlikely to experience much commercial or industrial
growth in the near future. The Township's small population and the nearby presence of industrial
and commercial areas in Toledo and Monroe, are likely to combine to limit its economic growth.
Township industrial activity is currently quite limited, even though the Township is located in a
transportation corridor between Toledo and Detroit and has access to both highway and rail
facilities. There are 1,517 acres of land in the Township which are zoned for industrial
development but little development has actua lly occurred here. A unique parcel, unique because
of its large size, is located along the C &amp; 0 Railroad. The reason lies partly in the Township's lack
of a public sanitary sewer system. Also, the existence of a better tax base just across the state line
in Ohio makes industrial prospects in Erie unattractive. There are 1,200 acres of vacant industrial
land composed of many separate parcels in Toledo waiting to be developed, and this competition
is likely to limit Erie Township industrial development for several years to come.
The future of commercial development in the Township is similarly limited. There is evidence
that Toledo and Monroe now meet, and will continue to meet, most of the major shopping needs
of Erie Township residents . In 1970, the U.S. Census reported that, of 2,005 workers living in
Erie Township, 1,029 worked in the Toledo-Lucas County, Ohio area, while 771 were employed
in Monroe County. Thus, over half the workers living in the Township work outside of it and,
likely, shop outside of it as well.
People who work in Toledo or the City of Monroe are particularly liable to do their
"comparison" shopping in these metropolitan centers. ("Comparison" shopping is for relatively
expensive goods, in which different brands and prices are normally "compared.") To a lesser
extent, Erie Township workers are also likely to do their grocery and "convenience" shopping in
the big cities, and this situation is not likely to change. The construction of two new major
shopping centers in the north part of Toledo is now pending. It can be anticipated that they will
take additional business potential away from Erie Township.
A demand for neighborhood shopping facilities in the Township exists but is already relatively
well satisfied. The 1,433 families identified in the 1970 census as living in Erie Township will
support approximately 28,000 square feet of convenience shopping facilities consuming four
acres of land for parking and circulation areas, and landscaping, as well as floor space in the
stores. In 1973, there were approximately 15 acres of commercially zoned land being used in the
Township, 11 acres more than the Township population should be able to continuously support.
As the Township population grows, there may be a need for some commercial expansion in
specific areas. Also, the need for commercial facilities to serve the regional highways which pass
through the Township will continue; current commercial development, in fact, is largely oriented
to Telegraph Road and Dixie Highway. In total, however, there is little to indicate that Erie
Township will attract any major commercial activity in the near future.
48

�What is the financial capability of the Township to meet its needs?
The total receipts in the Township General Fund have been increasing faster than inflation .
Most of this increase has been the result of increasing Federal and State shared revenues
particularly sales tax diversion and the State income tax. An increase in the property tax also
added to this addition in Township revenues as has Federal revenue sharing funds.
Year

1964-65
1965-66
1966-67
1967-68
1968-69
1969-70
1970-71
1971-72
1972-73
1973-74

Amount

$ 45,889.76
$ 88,704.59
$ 63,728.06
$ 70,274.00
$ 96,692.00
$117,372.55
$11 7,401 .51
$125,304.48
$146,816.37
$163,640.05

The main debt of the Township is the water system program approved for the $290,000 .00 bond
issue of January 1, 1973. The debt retirement program for that bond issue follows on Page 50.
A review of the general fund budget for the past several years indicates that the major capital
improvements have been road improvements, fire and park projects. The retirement of the water
bonds now becomes an important debt.
The use of bonding as a part of the capital improvements program should be limited to
non-recurring expenditures of substantial cost. Bond financing most often adds 40 to 100 percent
to the cost of the project. A general rule of thumb , admittedly conservative, is that the ratio of
ten percent indebtedness to full taxable value of the Township should prevail. In 1973, ten
percent ·of the property tax assessment of $19,236,298.00 was $192,363.00. Of course, the use
of the full-faith and credit of Monroe County will have the effect of increasing the amount of
bonded indebtedness that is reasonable. Obviously a high priority should be given to trunk line
sewers to serve the Township Center and the Halfway Creek community. Local assessments and
tap-in fees, federal and state funds should be considered for financing these sanitary sewers.
49

�The policy of the Township particularly where allocation of the shared revenues are made can
have a major and determining effect upon the growth and development of the Township. In
1973, the shared revenues of the Township from Federal revenue-sharing funds, State sales tax
diversion and State income tax totaled more than $75,000.00. If in the future some of these
funds are allocated for sanitary sewers, this allocation will be a major determination in the
increase of population and commerce in the Township .

SCHEDULE OF PRINCIPAL AND INTEREST
Requirements January 1, 1973 Bond Issue for
Construction of Water Laterals within Erie Township
Fiscal Year

Interest Due
July 1

1973-74
1974-75
1975-76
1976-77
1977-78
1978-79
1979-80
1980-81
1981-82
1982-83
1983-84
1984-85
1985-86

Principal Due
January 1

*$ 6,075.00
* 6,075.00
5,775.00
5,275.00
4,775.00
4,275.00
3,775.00
3,243.75
2,712.50
2,181.25
1,650.00
1,112.50
562.50

*$ 6,075.00
5,775.00
5,275.00
4,775.00
4,275.00
3,775.00
3,243 .75
2,712.50
2,181.25
1,650.00
1,112.50
562.50

$47,487.50

$41,412.50

Annual
Requirements

July 1

$ 15,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00
25,000.00

$ 12,150.00
26,850.00
36,050.00
35,050.00
34,050.00
33,050 .00
32,018.75
30,956 .25
29,893 .75
28,831 .25
27,762.50
26,675.00
25,562.50

$290,000.00

$378,900.00

*Funds have been set aside from the proceeds of the bond sale, and are in the custody of the
Monroe County Drain Commission to pay the first three interest payments totaling $18,225.00.
50
Source: Carlton, Longmuir, Cooley and Hehl, Report of Examination, fiscal period ended March 20, 1973, Erie Township,
Monroe County, Michigan.

�AGRICULTURE IN ERIE TOWNSHIP
Agriculture enjoys a special significance in Erie Township. Productive soils, a long growing
season, and the general availability of water in the Township make its farmland some of the best
in Michigan and, in fact, in the world. In 1973, land in neighboring LaSalle Township produced
that year's world record ~orn crop: 306.6 bushels per acre. While Erie Township has not
produced any world records, its farmland is very similar to that in LaSalle Township, and must be
ranked among the best.
The richness of Township farmland is in itself reason for it to be preserved. Additionally, the
preservation of farming as a way of li'fe in Erie Township is an important goal of the community.
Also, farmland demands fewer Township services than residential developments do. When
agricultural land is developed into home sites, demand for increased government services are
usually followed by tax increases, but the ratio of increased tax monies to the cost of services
usually decreases. Thus the Township may have to spend more money to serve new residential
development than such development will generate in taxes. It has been argued that agricultural
land should be subdivided, especially along the mile roads, but this argument ignores the
increased costs the Township would experience in providing services to the new subdivisions.
Also, other land less well suited for agriculture or adjacent to developed areas would be better
developed than the Township's valuable farmland. As was noted in the description of the General
Development Plan, the Michigan Legislature has established tax incentives for farmers who wish
to preserve their land for agriculture rather than permit its development for commercial,
residential or other uses. The Township will want to encourage farmers to take advantage of these
tax incentives.

51

�THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENT
The natural environment of Erie Township sets some real limitations on the amount and kind of
development that it can accomodate . Land in much of the Township is unsuitable for septic tank
operation because of low soil permeability and high groundwater tables, and in some places there
is a danger of septic tanks polluting bedrock aquifers. Organic soils along the Lake Erie shoreline
also have low load-bearing capacities that make building foundations difficult and expensive . The
land's capacity for development, then, is not great. Lake Erie also limits development in the
Township . Large areas along the shore line are subject to periodic flooding and flood hazards
exist along some of the creeks and streams in the Township as well . Flooding, sedimentation, and
pollution in these areas may become worse as development occurs upstream . The Township's
supply of groundwater is limited - and endangered. Extensive development and well drilling on
the edge of Toledo has caused the groundwater level to decline . Furthermore, the quality of the
groundwater is not good in the Township; dissolved minerals, odors, and pollution make it
difficult to use without extensive treatment . Pollution of the groundwater supply will increase if
septic tanks continue to be installed in inappropriate soils.
As previously discussed, the Erie Township environment is an excellent one for farming. The
glacial soils are rich and fertile, rainfall is adequate, and the nearness of Lake Erie temper the
climate and extends the growing season . Thus, the natural environment presents Erie Township
with some benefits as well as some problems.
For survey purposes, the natural environment of the Township can be subdivided into a number
of natural systems : climate, geology, topography, hydrology, soils, and vegetation. Following
descriptions of each individual element, the composite patterns they form together is reviewed.

52

�53

�Climate

Erie Township's climate is highly favorable for agriculture, due in part to the Township's
proximity to the western end of Lake Erie . This relationship has its disadvantages, too, however.
Strong easterly winds during the winter sometimes cause the lake to flood Township land.
Development plans of Erie Township need to recognize both the disadvantages and the
advantages of the local climate. Erie Township's climate is humid and continental, with a winter
season longer than the summer. Precipitation is usually adequate for growing crops, although a
severe one-month drought is experienced during one year out of every ten. With an average of 32
inches annually, the precipitation is fairly well distributed throughout the year, with 60% of it
coming in the crop-growing period between May and October. During this season, however, cro_ps
require up to 96% more water than they receive naturally in the form of precipitation . This
means that crops draw on water stored in the soil from snowfalls . About 31 inches of snow - the
lowest total snowfall in Michigan - falls in the average year with the total for any one year
ranging from 10 inches to 46 inches. Most Of the precipitation in the warm season comes in the
form of showers and thundershowers. The Township suffers occassionally from tornadoes, hail,
sleet, and ice storms, but these have rarely caused much damage.
Lake breezes are generated where the land meets the water, carrying the lake's influence inland
and making the climate milder. As a result, the first fall frost comes a week later to Erie
Township than it does to more inland locations. The average growing season is 165 to 170 days,
longer than any other growing season in Michigan with the exception of the Benton Harbor
region . Occasionally, there are temperature extremes in the Township, with temperatures
recorded at Monroe having ranged from 106°F to -21 OF. Still, these extremes are the exceptions
rather than the rule . Thus, although 78% of the minimum November through March temperatures
will be 32°F or below, only four days per year on the average will have temperatures below o°F .
Usually the lake tempers the climate and makes it more comfortable .
The lake in combination with the climate occasionally creates serious conditions for Erie
Township when the winds are from other than their prevailing westwardly direction. In the
winter, when cyclonic storms follow their usual route across the Great Lakes, strong easterly
winds may prevail for several days increasing Lake Erie's climatic influence. If water in the lake is
already high, strong easterly winds can cause severe flooding to Township lands lying in the Lake
Erie floodplain.

54

�Topography

Erie Township is characterized by flat featureless topography . Sediments deposited by glacial
lakes covering the entire Township at the end of the last ice age produced the near ly f lat
landscape we see today . The highest point in the northwest corner of the Township is about 640
feet above sea level, only 65 feet about Lake Erie. Th is produces a gradient of about 12-1/2 feet
per mile, a slope of only 0.2% in the Township. The name of Flat Creek, a Township stream,
reflects the flatness of the landscape that makes parts of the Township somewhat visually
monotonous.

55

�Geology

Geology. of the Township, when considered in detail, is complicated. Only certain geological
facts, however, are of significance to this planning survey:

t..&gt;¥e

GLACIAL-

L ~\
DeA:?SIT5

a.

The bedrock underlying the Township comes closer to the surface as one travels from the
southeast to the northwest In the northwest corner of the Township, the bedrock is very
near to the surface, even exposed on occasion, indicating places where foundation and sewer
pipe installation is restricted.

b.

In places where the bedrock is close to the surface, the groundwater level is also near. There
are places in the northwest corner of the Township where septic tanks should not be
permitted because they would drain almost directly into the groundwater, polluting it and
possibly creating health hazards for people with wells in other parts of the Township.

c.

The bedrock surface is very irregular . This means that even where it is close to the surface as
in the northwest corner, there are areas in which development can be permitted and other
areas where it cannot.

d.

Much of the soil in the Township was formed from clay deposited by the glaciers at the end
of the last ice age. On the surface , this clay has been re-worked into good agricultural soil,
but underneath it forms a stiff, water-tight layer or "hard-pan," covering the bedrock and
creating poor drainage conditions.

A~

e.

Some of the bedrock in the Township is similar to bedrock in other parts of Michigan in
which oil and gas deposits have been found. So far, however, no such deposits have been
located in Erie Township. Some oil and gas deposits occur in the Bass Island dolomites in
neighboring Bedford Township.

-..e

f.

The Bass Island dolomites have been quarried in other parts of Monroe County and may be
of some value to Erie Township . Because they are fairly close to the surface in the
northwest part of the Township and, since they can break down easily in water, they also
pose problems for construction and waste disposal in that area.

g.

One of the most noticeable products of the glaciers is the "beach ridge" in the northwest
part of the Township. Formed by Lake Algonquin, an ice age predecessor of Lake Erie, it is
important to the Township because it provides some topographical relief and visual contrast
to an otherwise level landscape.

A more technical discussion of Erie Township geology is given in Section A of the Appendix.

56

�Hydrology
Erie Township is crossed by a number of streams, some natural and others artificially created for
drainage purposes. They separate and help give identity to different land units in the Township
and offer opportunity for passive recreation. But some streams present danger of flooding to
adjacent residential development.
The streams can be classified into three types for planning purposes:
1.

Most Significant
have largest watersheds
have largest channel sizes and flows
water flows year-round, or nearly year-round
have greatest conservation and scenery potential

2.

Secondary
mostly tributaries to Class 1 (Most Significant) streams
similar to Class 1 streams, but less significant in each respect

3.

Minor
ditch-like, least significant
water flows only occasionally
have least conservation, scenery, and multiple-use potential

The Most Significant streams are those with the greatest potential for park space along their
banks. Because Halfway Creek is almost large enough to be a bay of Lake Erie, it is considered
more significant than other Township streams. The watersheds of Class 1 streams are located
largely within Bedford Township. Since the upper reaches of the streams are most sensitive to
pollution and impact from incorrect land uses, water quality in Erie Township will depend to a
large extent on controls in Bedford Township.
Many development problems in the Township involve water, in one way or another. Four kinds
of water-related problems facing Erie Township are those related to flooding, those related to
drainage, those related to groundwater availability, and those related to pollution.

Flooding, of course, has recently been a serious problem for Township residents. Nearly all of the
Township east of 1-75 lies in the Lake Erie floodplain which was subject to severe flooding during
several recent winters. It is not determinable how frequentl y this area is 1,kely to be flooded, but
the combination of a high water level and easterly winds produce conditions favorable for

~

'

""""""'°
"'-"""" "'""""""°
-rwr

(lt.a/•'Vt-Y

~11'~/{5

,t, f'«tffl0

57

�flooding. Records indicate that high water levels have occurred several times in Lake Erie since
1800. In 1952, for instance, lake levels were almost as high as those of the past several years.
The hydrology map shows just how extensive the Lake Erie floodplain is. Drawn on the basis of
information obtained during recent flooding, it reflects observations of the high water and
flotsam lines during the flooding of November, 1972, aerial photographs of high water levels near
the end of April , 1973, and direct field observation of the high water level on March 12, 1974.
The map, then, indicates where flooding has occurred before and where it could very well occur
again.
The Lake Erie floodplain is not the only area in the Township subject to flooding. A storm
drainage report prepared by the Lucas County (Ohio) Engineer indicates that some of the streams
in Erie Township are also unable to hold the runoff from a 10-year frequency storm. Because
Erie Township is so flat, these streams do not have much extra storage capacity or even a very
well-defined floodplain. During severe storms and during high water periods on Lake Erie, these
streams are likely to overflow their banks. The estimated water levels of Halfway Creek and the
Ottawa River during particular storm frequencies are shown on the hydrology map .

Drainage, generally poor in the area, is also a problem for much of Erie Township and limits its
development potential. Septic tanks in many parts of the Township are fairly likely to back up
during the wet season, creating a public health hazard for people who depend on them .
At one time, portions of the Township drained so poorly that they were part of a vast wetland
system extending through parts of Michigan, Indiana, Ohio and Ontario. The construction of
artificial drains, the drilling of drainage wells and the modifications of existing streams provided
most of the Township with sufficient drainage to make agricultural development possible. Now
most of the wetland system is gone, replaced by farmland. The areas near Lake Erie, however, are
still part of a poorly-drained wetland system and other wetland areas exist in areas of poor
drainage.

Groundwater availability from glacial deposits in the Township is limited. The soil in many parts
of the Township is very thin, with bedrock only a few feet below the surface, and much of the
area is covered with a "hard-pan." Both these factors limit the availability of groundwater.
There are confined sand and gravel aquifers in Monroe County. In places these are tapped by
wells, generally in areas above the bedrock "valleys" where the glacial drift (material deposited
by glaciers) is thick. Several areas of thick glacia l drift occur in Erie Township, but their potential
for wells is unknown. The sandy areas in the northwest.corner of the Township support a few
shallow wells but have limited ability to store water because there is always a danger of lowering
the water table; additional wells are probably not desirable.
58

�- .1

MAN-MADE DIKE

OPEN WATER

MOST SIGNIFICANT WAh:RCOl.11:SES

SWAMP/ MAASH

SECONDARY WATBlCOURSES

lAKE fLOOOPLAtN

MINOR WATERCOLRSES

HALF WAY CREEK - ESTIMATED SURFACE 10 YR. STORM
OTTAWA RIVER - ESTIMATED SUlfACE 25 YR. STORM

HYDROLOGY

~

59

�The sandy areas of the Township may have another use, however, as groundwater recharge areas
for the rest of the Township. The evidence for this is twofold. First, the sandy areas are in the
northwest corner of the Township, where subsurface water flows generally from northwest to
southeast. Second, large artesian springs issue from the bedrock in places such as a large spring
located on the Erie Shooting and Fishing Club property, suggesting that cavernous conditions
exist in the carbonate layers and that these layers are fairly permeable. If the sandy areas connect
to the carbonate strata, they may serve as conduits which guide precipitation into groundwater
aquifers. If this is the case, great care should be taken to prevent contamination of the
groundwater resource through these recharge areas. Groundwater from bedrock aquifers in
Monroe County is already too highly mineralized for public or domestic use without extensive
treatment, and further deterioration of groundwater quality would be unfortunate. Township
water has a disolved solids content of more than 1,000 parts per million, usually increasing with
depth. Groundwater from dolomite deposits also tends to contain hydrogen sulfide, giving it a
disagreeable odor. Some impairment of groundwater supplies at the Hagman Road landfil I site
has been reported (Earthview, Inc., 1973).
Unfortunately, what groundwater the Township has is in some danger of being used up . The
water pressure level in the Township drops dramatically from the northwest to the southeast,
creating a water pressure "depression" in the southeast part of the Township. This depression
exists because suburban developments in that area and high-yield wells in Toledo are removing a
lot of water from the groundwater table. Even more importantly, a downward flow of
near-surface to bedrock groundwater exists in most of the Township making surface
contamination of groundwater possible.

Pollution already exists in Erie Township: 1973 measurements by the Michigan Water Resources
Commission show that the water quality of Halfway, Silver and Shantee Creeks does not meet
State standards for total body contact or for warm water fish habitats. Halfway Creek has too
much fecal coliform, suspended solids and nitrate nitrogen to meet State standards; other streams
have additional problems. The pollutants identified so far are typical runoff pollutants, and it is
likely that most Township streams are somewhat polluted by agricultural and roadside runoff.

Pllii'U&gt;Mla!ife.lC. WA11"'2- ~li"i- MAP
(~IAN)
CONiDllR.. l ~ A L - (/MtfJLA 19~ )

60

L

10 ~

Lake Erie, of course, suffers from much worse pollution. A 1965 U.S. Public Health Service
Report examined the vast amounts of pollutants being dumped into the lake by the Detroit,
Raisin, and Huron Rivers, numerous creeks, and unsewered shore line homes. In 1965, this
pollution made hazardous all forms of water contact sports near the mouth of the Detroit River,
and other pollution sources made nearby lakes unsafe at times as well. How much of this
pollution ?ffects the Erie Township lakeshore is not known. It seems likely, however, that
lake-borne pollutants reach the area when the wind is from the north. Southerly winds may also
cause pollutants from Toledo to affect the Township lake shore as well.

�Soils
Soils in Erie Township were deposited by glacial lakes during the last ice age. These soils are
generally good for agriculture but not for development. Clay and silt soils in the Township have
poor permeability and poor drainage; organic soils have poor land bearing capacities in addition
to poor drainage. Still other soils are sufficiently permeable but, due to high water tables, provide
septic systems with no drainage. Even in the sandy northwest corner of the Township, only about
30% of the land is suitable for septic tanks.
Most of the Township lies east and southeast of a beach ridge and is covered by clayey and silty
soils, while sandy soils exist northwest of it. Organic soils and alluvium (material deposited by
rivers and streams) occur along some of the streams and in wetland areas next to Lake Erie .
The sandy soils northwest of the beach ridge are the only ones in the Township fully suitable for
septic tanks. Water tends to percolate rapidly through them, with rates of percolation ranging
from 24 minutes per inch to as fast as six minutes per inch. Still, not all of these soils are suitable
for septic systems. In some places, where bedrock lies within three feet of the soil surface,
percolation may actually be too fast, all-owing contaminants to flow into the groundwater
without adequate filtration. In other places, where water tables are too close to the surface,
percolation rates are appropriate but the sewage simply has no place to go. The Granby loamy
fine sand, for instance, has a percolation rate of six to 12 minutes per inch, but it occurs where
the water table is at or near the surface unless artifically drained. Many tile drains in the
Township help maintain a lowered water table and minimize the area in which this problem
exists.
Southeast of the beach ridge, and cover ing much of the Township, is a zone of clayey and silty
soils with the most important, the Lenawee silty clay loam and the Del Ray silt loam, having a
high silt and clay content and poor permeability. Percolation rates vary from moderately slow
(24-62 minutes per inch) in the upper layers to slow (24-300 minutes per inch) in the lower
layers. These soils also have poor surface drainage and a water table which is near the surface for
at least part of the year.
The other soils in the clayer/silty zone have severe limitations for septic systems, according to
Soil Conservation Service evaluations, because of slow percolation rates and seasonally high water
tables . Also, they genera ll y have fair to poor load bearing capacities and are subject to frost heave
and cracking. All in all, the clayey/silty zone is less than ideal for constructior;i and development.
The organic and alluvial soils which exist in the Lake Erie floodplain and along the sides of
streams are also poor for development. Subject to flooding and with water tables at or near the
surface, they are especially unsuited for septic disposal systems.
61

�I

I

L

'

0

8 -2"'to6%slopm

' 1,0t11Cun,;,llorca1oflhe10,oih""')'havc1!opc,1of

l"uff)o.,2'1,.
10 mol'YI
11 0:,1(..,lllefinc,.,nd

13 Slovnlloa"'
14

0..1 Roy,ih IOOff!

15

fuhon1ilt loom

16

Todrow loamy:.and

18

Granby loamy finotond

19

SolfridgiJ loamytond

21

lcnowcc ,iltydoy loam

22

Pcwomo cloy loom
C«unna10n:ly loam
llountclayloa,n
&amp;lounl cloy loam {$hallow vcrrionl )

24
75
26

27 ......
28

Kibble very fine t&lt;Jndy loam

29

Colwood loom

JO Sloon loom
31

madolond

33
JS

CltCO,,O!ed,af"G$

J6
◄I

I

62

SOILS

borrowpl~
Gronby,...n:I, loamy1ubsolt
Me1oa SOl'ld, coi:,...., wbsoil

I

-----·-

�'V

-

,OSSl3l.E GEDltOCt- wilt,in

,o- o: -'oc•

SU ITABLEFOlt SEPTIC

LAND CAP.4.IILlfY Cl.ASS
Thocopc,bility clos1ifl,;o1l.,,.i,09roupingol&gt;O&lt;h
ihal.hoWt.inogc"'°,ol...,yhowwilabl,;o~yorc
fotfflOltkindsoflom,lt19.

Thttosoil,c.,,.IOinfow«notimitotio...lo,rorm
..,c . ThoycMlh.sofolycuht...., ,edyoorlywirhour
ony,~loltreah'nonttocontroln;noflotcon"'r,c

the.oil.

Tho.o,oll,hc,.,oli,..;,01ion,lhotr-.ducc,t+lachoicc
of plant, or require,,_ ConMINO!ion proc;tico,,
b,,,tth&lt;tlimito•iorn.orofowc,ndrheproc1lco•cosy
toapply.
Clo•lc,r,dllM»l 1 orwinhc,..,1lyP&gt;C!be!11wihf.,.
ogrlculh.no.

SOILS SUMMARY

------

63

�Unfortunately, the unsuitability of many Township soils for septic tank systems has not
prevent~d their installation. Monroe County Health Department regulations require that no septic
tank system be installed where maximum groundwater levels or surface flooding would adversely
affect the operation of the system - but they apparently have not been fully enforced. The
Department allows septic sy$tems in soils with percolation rates as slow as 30 minutes per inch.
In clay soils with slower percolation rates, the health officer is empowered to determine what
methods, if any, can be employed to satisfy the intent of the ordinance. In other words, septic
tanks have been (and may be) legally installed in areas with severe soil limitations with special
filter bed materials. In planning for future development, the Township may wish to establish
more restrictive regulations concerning septic systems.
Development guidelines for the Township should also recognize the richness of its clayey and
silty soils, many of which have been classified by the Soil Conservation Service as having Class I
or Class II agricultural suitability .

Vegetation
Only scattered remnants of the thick forest that once covered Erie Township now exist, as
woodlots in the northwest section of the Township and in long strips along the Lake Erie shore
line. Orchards planted by early settlers also dot the northwest zone.
Because so few natural wooded areas remain, they should be treated as a valuable resource. In
addition to enhancing the Township's visual appearance, woodlots in the northwest part of the
Township reduce the amount of runoff that would otherwise occur in this area thus increasing
the potential recharge of groundwater in sandy areas and adding to the Township's groundwater
resources.
Vegetation, especially in the large woodlots, also provides shelter for wildlife. In order to
maximize this value, the Township should maintain the relative isolation provided by the larger
woodlots as well as linkage between the woodlots and other vegetation masses and water.
Stretches of scrub vegetation along drainage ditches and small streams can serve this function as
well as to stabilize the banks of streams and ditches. Maintenance of these woodlots can be
encouraged by reducing taxes and developing a management program with the help of the State
forestor.
A more technical discussion of Erie Township community vegetation types can be found in
Section B of the Appendix.

64

�y of LUNA PIER

m~,s
Plant

LAKE

t-a

ERIE

North ea,,_

_,.v

PLANO WOODS - Oo1/Hickory

-II
Ill
•,

-

TRA N.SITlONAt/MIXEO WOOD
FlOODPlAIN/W
S - Ook/Hld«&gt;&lt;y/Mopl,vCotto,,

IV. SWAMP/MARSH

_V,

ETLAND WOODS - Will

wood

ow/Mop1e/Co11o~

O:KHAR0S

~
1 Mlle

65

�Natural Environment Overview

Natural systems exist only in relation to each other . Soils, topography, hydrology and vegetation
interact on each other and together they affect the environment and its capacity for
development . These larger patterns of composite natural systems are even more significant than
their individual components.
Sandy soils, better drainage conditions, upland vegetation, and a slightly rising topography all
occur together in the northwest corner of the Township, separated from the remainder by a
glacial beach ridge (Zone I) . Similarly, organic soils, marshland and floodplain vegetation,
flooding, and high water tables all occur in the Lake Erie floodplain (Zone Ill). Still a third
cluster of natural characteristics defines a broad zone in the center of the Township (Zone I IA
and 11 B). This arrangement of natural features suggests some possible development patterns for
Erie Township that follow nature and make beneficial use of it rather than conflict with it. These
patterns form the basis for the Landscape Zones discussed in the General Development Plan and
tie in with patterns in the human environment.

66

�l
THE HUMAN ENVIRONMENT
The existing man-built environment, like the natural environment, has both negative and positive
features having implication upon development in Erie Township. Several features of the
man-built environment in Erie Township are: transportation facilities, utilities, schools, parks,
and other local government facilities.
Transportation Facilities

Regional transportation corridors cut Erie Township into a series of north/south strips opposing a
Township goal to encourage more east/west development. Planning for the Township will need to
counteract this problem.
The major highways in the Township also tend to delinerate the different natural areas. Telegraph
Road, for instance, separates the northwest corner of the Township with its unique natural
systems from the rest of the Township. Similarly, 1-75 forms a boundary to the Lake Erie
floodplain which differs in soil type, drainage and vegetation from the rest of the Township.
The most important highways in Erie Township, of course, are Dixie Highway, Telegraph Road,
and 1-75. Dixie Highway, historically the first and most important route through the Township, is
now third in importance, serving mostly as a local collector route between Toledo and Monroe.
Telegraph Road is more significant than Dixie Highway but less than 1-75, the primary route
carrying traffic between Detroit and Toledo.
The construction of the 1-75 Expressway has caused an interesting change in the Township. It has
shifted regional traffic from Telegraph Road, on the Township's western edge, to its eastern edge
along the Lake Erie floodplain . This signals a major adjustment in the physical structure of the
Township that could allow the development of an east/west corridor between Telegraph and 1-75,
th.us helping to achieve a Township community goal.
The current improvements to the 1-75 freeway will not change the accessibility pattern within the
Township but will improve the safety of the Luna Pier/Erie/Summit Street interchanges. A major
roadway change being made, however, that will affect Erie Township aevelopment involves
Alexis Road in Toledo, beyond the Township's boundary line. Alexis Road is presently being
extended and provided with an interchange with 1-75 providing industrial traffic in Toledo with
direct access to the freeway. This should reduce the impact of such traffic on Erie Township and
strengthen the basis for industrial expansion in Bedford Township and the southwestern portion
of Erie Township.

67

�Railroads in the Township run parallel to the major highways. The Chesapeake and Ohio Railroad
runs along the eastern edge of Telegraph Road while the Detroit, Toledo and Shoreline Railroad,
the Michigan Central, and the Penn Central lie between Dixie Highway and 1-75.
East/west travel in Erie Township is basically dependent on Luna Pier Road (M-151) and Erie
Road in the north, and on Sterns Road in the south. These roads may undergo changes in the
near future. Improved east/west routes across the northern part of the Toledo urbanized area are
needed and although no specific plans have been drawn up, Luna Pier Road and Sterns Road can
be expected to assume more important roles in the regional traffic pattern between U.S. 23 and
1-75.
North/south travel in the Township is supplemented by Summit Street and Suder Avenue, which
provide additional access to Toledo.

68

Regional Transportation Corridors

�RAUCH RO.

HIG~AY INTS:CHANGE
1-7S INTERSTATE HIGHWAY
U,S, HIGHWAYS
COUNTY PRIMA.RIES PAVED
LOO.L RO,.OS PA VED - - LINPAVEO
•OADWAYS WHICH PERMIT A H1GH OEGftff OF VISL"'l ACCESS TO THE PREDOMINANT CHAAACTERISllCS Of THE
AREA OU£ TO ITS POSITION
ROADWAYS WITH PREDOMINANT &amp;AARIER CHARACTERISTICS
ROADS WITH LINKING CHAAACTERISTICS
PIUMARY EAST/WEST CONNECTO!!S
LOCAL APPROACH ZONES

PREDOMINANT APPROACH ZONES
PROPOSED ROAD CONNECTION TO COMPUTE A COMMITTED DIRECTION OF MOVE-

MENT

LAKE ERIE

Nori/I Al-~~ Boy

-~~~TRANSPORTATION

�Utilities
At the present time, Erie Township has inadequate water service and no public sanitary sewer
service. Because of natural limitations on septic systems in the Township, it is particularly
important that the Township acquire sewer service, if development is to occur here in any
magnitude.
Sewage treatment facilities exist in the general area around the Township. A municipal treatment
plant is located in the City of Luna Pier, to the northeast, and Monroe County maintains a
treatment plant in Bedford Township to the southwest . There is also a water line that runs
through the Township beginning in Bedford Township, running along Dixie Highway to Co-151
(Luna Pier Road), and along Co-151 to serve the City of Luna Pier .
The possibility of using these regional facilities to provide water and sewer service for Erie
Township has been documented in The Comprehensive Plan for Water and Sewage Development,
proposed by Finkbeiner, Pettis &amp; Strout, Ltd. Existing sewage treatment facilities provide the
basis for two basic development districts; one district, in the southwestern portion of the
Township tied into the Bedford Township treatment plant and the other, in the north central
part forming an east/west development district served by the Luna Pier facility .
Although water lines and sewers are the utilities of interest to this basis for the plan, there are
also other utility lines in Erie Township. The electric transmission lines leaving the Consumers
Power Company's Whiting Power Plant, for instance, have a visual impact on the Township
which, together with several gas lines, cut across the Township and divide it into segregated land
units, having an effect like that of the regional highways. Like the highways, these utility lines
serve regional rather than Township needs.

Schools
Township educational needs are served by the Mason Consolidated School District, encompassing
all of Erie Township, the City of Luna Pier and part of LaSalle Township. The District provides
excellent facilities, including a high/junior high/elementary school complex at Luna Pier Road
and Dixie Highway, and other elementary schools at Suder Avenue and Benore Road and in the
City of Luna Pier. Another elementary school is located in LaSalle Township
As the Township grows, however, more educational facilities will have to be provided. These can
fit onto land already owned by the school district. The sites at Luna Pier Road and Dixie
Highway, and at Suder Avenue and Benore Road, are well located and large enough to permit
expansion.

70

�m

Sewage Treatment

-···- Electric
- ··- Buried Telephone Cable
- · - Gas-Local
- - Existing Water Line
--- Proposed Water Line

-·-UTILITIES

71

�Parks

Erie Township contains three park areas: Maplewood, a park in the residential area of the
Township Center of Erie; South Erie Park, an undeveloped park along the banks of the Rapideau
Drain; and a park development connected to the Mason school complex.
Together, these areas provide Erie Township with 19.5 acres of recreation space, according to the
Monroe County Recreational Land Acreage Survey. This is far less than the 35.5 acres per 4,500
people called for by general recreation planning guidelines. Because Erie Township's population
has grown since the 1970 census count of 4,494, more park and recreation land is needed.
Other Local Government Facilities

Local government facilities are inadequate in several respects and will need to be expanded if the
Township is to serve its slowly growing population . It is expected that future needs wi!I be
greatest for public safety facilities (police and fire department) and for the maintenance of streets
and utility systems. These facilities should be placed in the two basic development districts
located around sewer lines.
At present, local government facilities such as the Township Hall, the fire station and the library
are located within the Township Center of Erie. A second fire station is located on Morin Point.
The Township Hall and the fire station do not have adequate parking and therefore contribute to
congestion on nearby streets. Even though land has recently been acquired for parking facilities
around the Township Hall, additional land should be purchased for this purpose.
An analysis of library needs in the "Comprehensive Development Plan for the Monroe County
Region" indicates that the present library is inadequate in space and size of staff. Expansion
should therefore be planned.
The second fire station on Morin Point is not well located for serving the southern part of the
Township. It is too small to p'rovide the service that will be needed as the area becomes more
developed and its location in the floodway of Lake Erie is subject to periodic flooding. The
Township should program a new fire station in a new location.

72

�TY of LUNA PIER

I

I
I

suMtr~

.-Pion!

I

LAKE

ERIE

\

•

\I
I

COMMITTED
DEVELOPMENT
PRIME
AGRICULTURE
RECREATION/
OPEN SPACE

-

PRIMARY
CIRCULATION
➔ LOCAL
APPROACH
ROUTES

L

_v

RECREATION / OPEN SPACE SYSTEMS

1

Miie

:s

73

�THREE POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT STRATEGIES

Based upon the regional context of Erie Township, its community goals, social and economic
trends, and the natural and man-made environments, three alternative ways to guide Erie
Township development were considered during the planning process . Although these were
eventually combined into a single General Development Plan, as circumstances change, the
particular mix of ideas that make up the General Development Plan may no longer be appropriate
and the Township may wish to shift the emphasis to one development concern .
The three develop mer.it alternatives are the corridor development, the east/west centroid, and the
cluster pattern. All three recommend low density residential development in the Township's
northwest corner and for preservation of the shoreland/wetland area in the Lake Erie floodplain.
Their differences center around Landscape Zone 11.
The Corridor Development

The corridor development takes advantage of the strong corridor structure of the Township. It
would conform to past zoning practices allowing strip development along highways.
The difficulty of this type of development is the inefficiencies it creates. Sewer lines have to
stretch long distances to serve all the development along the highway corridor and fire engines
and police cars need to travel longer distances to get to their destinations. Because development
depends on the location of highways, new interchanges would have an unpredictable effect upon
it.
The East/West Centroid

This alternative recognizes the restructuring of regional accessibility brought about by the 1-75
expressway and the change of development pressures it brings to the Township. In a regional
sense, 1-75 maintains the pattern of north/south transportation corridors, but in Erie Township it
establishes a counter-force . By taking advantage of the interchanges at Luna Pier Road and Erie
Road, and by controlling the flow of traffic between 1-75 and Telegraph Road, the Township can
establish an east/west development pattern.
The Cluster Pattern

This development alternative clusters development around places where it already exists: the
Township Center of Erie and the developed areas between Telegraph Road and Dixie Highway.
This pattern assumes limited gro\/\!th as suggested by economic and population predictions for the
Township.
The General Development Plan is derived from the combination of the three alternative
development strategies. This combination is the result of the goals established by the township,
by existing conditons and by present and future development potentials in the township. None of
the alternatives by themselves were found to meet the township's needs, potentials, or goals.

74

��MORE ON ERIE TOWNSHIP GEOLOGY
The bedrock underlying Erie Township is part of the Michigan Basin, a geological depression
which centers in the lower peninsula of the state and extends outward to bordering states and
Canada. Different strata of this basin make up the basement rock of successive concentric rings
extending outward from the center.
In Erie Township, the basement rock dates back to the Precambrian era, over 600 million years
ago. This igneous and metamorphic rock is covered by strata formed during the Devonian and
Silurian periods, about 400 million years ago . In Monroe County, these Devonian and Silurian
strata lie in a northeast/southwest direction, and tilt upwards towards the northwest at about 50
feet per mile. Thus, younger rocks are closer to the surface in the northwest part of the country.
Two groups of Devonian and Silurian strata, the Salina group and the Bass Islands group, occur in
Erie Township. Both strata were formed by sedimentation of warm inland seas during the
Paleozoic era about 400 million years ago.
The Salina group, which covers nearly all of the Township, consists of dolomites, shales, and
dolomitic shales. These rocks are of limited mineral value, and no surface exposures of them exist
in the Township . Oil and gas deposits are often found in porous zones of these rocks, but rarely
in sufficient quantities to support producing wells. At any rate, no producing wells are known to
exist in or near the Township.

•::::: _::•:·

~

··••·

~-r~PMY
(D"TllM 1,&gt; M9AN 6"'A ~ )
cc,..n-ot.{FL l,,AI~

{ 11\J&lt;P)U.

~"1 )

-

10 f=I:!;~

I

The Bass Islands rock group consists entirely of dolomites. This group has been quarried, and is
still being quarried, in some sections of Monroe County . Sinkholes and oil and gas wells have also
been associated with the Bass Islands group, but again these only occur in other parts of the
County.
Bass Islands dolomite is fairly close to the surface in much of the northwest part of Erie
Township, and in the far northwest corner it forms outcroppings above the surface of the ground.
This could pose problems for construction and waste disposal, since Bass Islands dolomite is
prone to solution decay.
The topography of the bedrock surface underneath the Township is irregular. Valleys running
from the northwest to the southeast were apparently carved in the bedrock during the Wisconsin
glaciation, when Lake Erie was much lower than it is today and glaciers cut gashes in the rock as
they moved downhill to meet the lake.

76

�Thus, the bedrock is very near the surface in the northwest corner of the Township and along the
steep sides of the valleys. Within the valleys themselves, and in the southeast corner of the
Township, the bedrock lies far below the surface. Foundation design and sewer installations need
to consider bedrock topography in this area.
Groundwater aquifers, or underground reservoirs, may exist in the Township; if so, they are
likely to follow the bedrock topography and be related to its irregularities.
Covering the bedrock in the Township is a layer of material deposited here during the retreats
and advances of glaciers during the Ice Age. This glacial drift contains two kinds of material:
material deposited directly by the glaciers, and material spread by glacial melt water. The
material deposited directly by the glaciers is called till.
Much of the bedrock in Erie Township seems to be covered by a plain of glacial till or stiff clay,
along with some coarser material. The surface of the till has been reworked into good agricultural
soil by the action of glacial lakes, which covered the Township as the glaciers began to melt and
move north . The lower part of the till, however, seems to form a water-tight layer over the
bedrock causing poor drainage. Well drillers consider this layer a "hardpan ."
During the retreat of the Wisconsin glaciation, a series of lakes covered various parts of the
Erie-Huron lowland in this general area. One of these lakes, glacial Lake Algonquin, formed an
interrupted beach ridge in the northwest section of the Township when its water level was about
605 feet above sea level. This beach ridge provides some of the most prominent relief in an
otherwise flat area and was used for cemeteries by early settlers because of its height and sand
composition.

OVl!!!IZ-e&gt;a~DeN
CON,0{,//2. /N.,...,.,VAL--

(MI\UJU..

~ICl&lt;NE!S!E&gt;
- 10 r,,,e:-r

i"f"'f)

Glacial lakes also deposited varying amounts of sand, silt, and clay on different parts of the
Township. Northwest . of the beach ridge, the primary deposits were lacustrine (that is,
lake-deposited) sands. Southeast of the ridge, the Township was covered with lake-deposited clay
and silt. The clay and silt provided the Township with good agricultural soil, but also kept the
Township from having any significant deposits of sand and gravel.

77

�ERIE TOWNSHIP VEGETATION TYPES
Erie Township vegetation can be classified into four major community types : upland woods,
transitional/mixed woods, floodplain/wetland, and swamp/marsh vegetation. As the names
indicate, these vegetation types reflect different environments in the Township .
The upland woods vegetation mostly occurs in the northwest part of the Township and consists
largely of mature, medium-stock oaks and hickories with some more than 30 inches in diameter.
These trees form the overstory of the upland woods; the understory consists largely of dogwood
and redbud, with young maples predominating on wetter sites. Recently logged or grazed
woodlots have more hawthorn and herbaceous shrubs in the understory.
The transitional/mixed woods vegetation type is similar to the upland woods in form and
composition, but occurs on soils with more moisture and of higher clay content. There is a large
amount of maple, cottonwood, ash, box elder, and hackberry in this group, in addition to the
oaks and hickories. It occurs frequently along the sides of streams and ditches and includes much
scrub growth.
The floodplain/wetland vegetation type is associated with wetlands and in the Lake Erie
floodplain. Consisting of cottonwood, box elder, maple, ash, hackberry and black poplar; with
willow increasingly important along the Lake Erie shoreline, these woods consist of dense,
mature stands of trees.

78

�On the Woodtick Peninsula, this vegetation type consists overwhelmingly of willows, toppled by
shoreline erosion. Wild grape grows vigorously in the understory and even into the crowns of
trees.
The swamp/marsh type occurs where lake or stream waters are shallow and relatively permanent.
Trees are more scattered than in the floodplain woods, but of the same species mi x. Blade-like
plants such as reeds and rushes ex ist in large numbers, with much of this vegetation area
contiguous to Lake Erie .
All of these vegetation types ex ist because of environmental conditions. Unless these change, the
woods will remain largely as they are today. There have been, of course, some changes in
vegetation patterns since the area was settled. Hackberry and box elder are more abundant now,
due to grazing and logging activity and planted and ornamental trees have "escaped" from
cultivation and become integral parts of the woodland community.
The Township's elm, beech, willow, oak and hickory trees, however, represent remnants of the
forest which covered Erie Township before settlers first came here. While the mix of these trees
in the forest have changed because of disturbances like Dutch elm disease, the species remain the
same.

79

�POPULATION ERIE TOWNSHIP

Population Counts, 1950 To 1970

Count Of Persons By Race, 1970

Population 1950
Population 1960
Population 1970*

4,442
4,116
4,494

Count Of Persons By Sex And Age, 1970
Age Group

Under 5
5
6
7 -9
10- 13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22- 24
25- 34
35- 44
45- 54
55- 59
60 - 61
62- 64
65- 74
75 and over
Totals

Fema les

Totals

2 11
55
45
151
235
62
50
55
44
25
45
24
21
82
259
259
221
93
34
65
106
64

243
48
52
160
202
61
59
45
41
51
38
23
39
91
267
247
224
98
35
61
101
59

454
103
97
3 11
437
123
109
100
85
76
83
47
60
173
526
506
445
191
69
126
207
123

2,206

2,245

4,45 1

*This f igu re ref lects the latest correction by t he U. S.
Bureau of the Census br ing in g t he ori gina ll y reported
population f igure of 4,451 to a new tota l of 4,494.

80

4,424
12
15

Population By Country Of Origin, Nativity

Males

Source: Monroe County Plann ing Commission

White
Negro
Other Non-White

Total Population

4,451

Native of Native Parentage
Tota l Foreign

4,029
422

Native of Foreign or Mixed Parentage
Foreign Born
United Kingdom and Ireland
West Europe
East Europe
Med iterranean and Other
Asia
Americas
Africa
Other and not Reported

247
175
7
82
160
12
14
136
11

Average Household Size

Total Popu lation

3.54

Average Family Size

Tota l
Wh ite
Non-White Population

3.90
3.90
2.75

However, it was not poss ibl e to ad j ust t he other tab les
to correspond to the new tota l . Consequent ly they
are st ill based upon the earl ier count.

�Marital Status of Persons 14 Years Old &amp; Over

Now Married
Widowed
Divorced
Separated
Never Married

Mobility:

66.9%
5.5%
2.7%
1.0%
23.9%

POPULATION ERIE TOWNSHIP

Persons By Year Moved Into Unit

1970- 1969
1969-1965
1964-1960
Prior to 1960

6 16
1,226
845
1,794

Family Composition
Residency In 1965 For Population 5 And Over

Tota l Families

1,089

Husband-Wife Families
With Children under 6
With Ch il dren under 18

984
273
577

Male Headed Families
With Chi ldren under 6
With Chi ld ren under 18

38

Same Hou se
Same County
Mich igan
From North and West
From South
From Abroad and Not Reported

19

Education:

Female Headed Families
With Ch il dren under 6
With Ch ildren under 18

67
5
40

Persons Aged 3 To 34 By School Attendance

Primary Individua l
Population in Group Quarte rs

170
0

Kindergarten to 8th Grade
High School
College

2,610
836
91
325
57
141

1,092
386
85

Households With Head 62 Years Old &amp; Over

Husband-Wife Family
Other Family with Ma le Head
Family with Female Head
Ma le Primary Individual
Female Primary Individual

146
11
17
34
54

Source: Monroe County Planning Commission

81

�HOUSING ERIE TOWNSHIP

Year Round Housing Unit Characteristics

Housing Unit Characteristics
Total Housing Units

1,363

Year Built

Occupied Housing Units

1,259

1969 - 1970
1965 - 1968
1960 - 1964
1950 - 1959
1940 - 1949
19~9 or earlier

Owner Occupied Units
Renter Occupied Units
Vacant Housing Units
Vacant Year Round
Vacant for Sale
Vacant for Rent
Vacant Seasonal &amp; Migratory

999
260
92
79
8
5
13

Mobile Home Parks*

Licensed Parks
Licensed Sites

1

20

10
68
96
326
237
601

Units In Structure

1 Unit, Detached
1 Unit, Attached
2 Units.
3 - 4 Units
5 - 9 Units
10 - 19 Units
20 or more Units
Mobile Home or Trailer

1,217
57
27
15

22

Access

*This figure of 1,363 total housing units reflects the
most recent correction by the U. S. Bureau of the
Census . However, the following tables are based on
the originally reported figures for they could not be
adjusted to include the newly recognized units.
(From 1970 - 1973 an additional 111 housing units
were built.)

Source: Monroe County Planning Commission

82

With Direct Access
Without Direct Access

1,337
1

�Year Round Housing Units

Occupied Housing Units

Complete Kitchen Facilities

Tenure &amp; Race of Head

Wit h Comp lete Kitchen Fac il ities
Without Comp lete Kitchen Fac ili ties

1,292
46

Owner Occupied

1,255
83

Renter Occupied

1,278

Age Of Head

Plumbing Facilities
With All Plumbing Fac il ities
Lacks One or More Fac ility
Toilet Facilities
Flush Toil et fo r t hi s household onl y
Fl ush To il et but also used by
another household
No Fl ush To il et

3
57

Source of Water

Public System or Private Company
Individua l We ll
Other Source (spri ng, creek, river
cistern , et c.)

28
1,255

Wh ite Head
Negro Head
Other Non-Wh ite

Under 30 Years of Age
30 - 44 Years of Age
45 - 64 Years of Age
65 Years and Older
Other Family
Primary Individua l

999
994
3
2

260
258

168
339
373
96
96
187

Number of Persons in Unit
55

Type of Sewage Disposal
Pub lic Sewer
Septic Tank or Cesspool
Other Means

Wh ite Head
Negro Head
Other Non-White

HOUSING ERIE TOWNSHIP

31
1,187
120

Un its
Units
Units
Un its
Units
Units
Units
Units

w it h
with
with
w ith
with
with
with
with

1 person
2 persons
3 persons
4 persons
5 persons
6 persons
7 persons
8 or mo re

160
358
187
199
136
99
60
60

Source : Monroe County Planning Commission

83

�HOUSING ERIE TOWNSHIP

Occupied Housing Unit Characteristics, 1970

Owner Occupied Housing Unit Characteristics, 1970

Number of Persons Per Room

Year Built

1.00 or less per room
1.01 - 1.50 per room
1.51 or more per room

1,114
109
36

Year Structure Built
1969 - 1970
1965- 1968
1960 - 1964
1950 - 1959
1940- 1949
1939 or earlier

84
3 14
220
569

67

27
1,183
49

Sewage Disposal

Public Sewer
Septic Tank or Cesspool
Other Means

30
1,143
86

Source : Monroe County Planning Commission

84

67
296
151
424

Age of Head
Under 30 Years of Age
30 - 44 Years of Age
45 - 64 Years of Age
65 Years and Older
Other Family
Primary Individual

59

267
323
90
89
171

1,192

Source of Water

Public System or Private Company
Individual Well
Other Source (spring, creek, ri ver
cistern, etc.)

10
51

10

62

Plumbing Facilities

With Al l Plumbing Facilities
Lacks One or More Facil ities

1969 - 1970
1965 - 1968
1960 - 1964
1950- 1959
1940 - 1949
1939 or ear lier

Units in Structure
1 Unit, Detached
1 Unit, Attached
2 Units
3-4Units
5 - 9 Units
10 - 19 Units
20 or More Units
Mobile Home or Trailer

955
21

7

16

�Owner Occupied Housing Units, 1970

HOUSING ERIE TOWNSHIP

Home Valu e

Family Income

Percent of units in home va lue group:

Percent of homeowners in income groups:

Less than $5,000
$5,000 - $9,999
$10 ,000 - $14,999
$15,000 - $19,999
$20,000 - $24,999
$25,000 - $34,999
$35,000 or more

5.3%
21.1%
22.7%
23.5%
12.8%
8. 7%
5.6%

Less than $3,000
$3,000 - $4,999
$5,000 - $6,999
$7 ,000 - $9,999
$10,000 - $14,999
$ 15,000- $24,999
$25,000 and over

16 .98%
6.48%
8 .37%
21.58%
29 .95%
13.67%
2.94%

Owner Occupied Units Value, By Family Income

Percent of units in home value group, by income of family:

Home Value

Less than $5,000
$5 ,000 - $9,999
$10,000 - $ 14,999
$15,000 - $ 19,999
$20,000 - $24,999
$25,000 - $34,999
$35,000 or more

Less than
$3,000

48.8
27.9
19.6
2.5
15.5
25.0

$3,000
$4,999

$5,000
$6,999

$7 ,000
$9,999

$10,000
$14,999

5.5
8.8
8.0

26.6
8.3
8.2
8.5
100

11. 1
24.0
27.4
21.5
18.3
20.2
8.3

20.6
20.2
42.0
51.3
51 .3

8. 1
12.5

$15,000
$24,999

13.3
10.6
12.9
15.0
13.5
54.1

$25,000
and over

2.7
2.5
2.5
4.5
6.7

Source: Monroe County Planning Commission

85

�HOUSING ERIE TOWNSHIP

Renter Occupied Unit Characteristics, 1970
Gross Rent

Year Built

Percent of Renters Paying:

1969 - 1970
1965 - 1969
1960 - 1964
1950 - 1959
1940 - 1949
1939 or earlier

Less than $40
$40- $59
$60 - $79
$80 - $99
$100 - $149
$150 - $199
$200 or more
No Rent

2.69%
23 .76%
57.84%
13.45%
2.24%

Income

Percent of Renters in In come Class :
Less than $2,000
$2,000 - $2,999
$3,000 - $4,999
$5,000 - $6,999
$7,000 - $9,999
$10,000 - $14,999
$15,000 - $24,999
$25,000 or more

4.93%
4.03%
5.82%
16.14%
37.21%
17:04%
12.10%
2.69%

Source: Monroe County Planning Commission

86

11
17

18
69
145

Units in Structure

1 Unit, Detached
1 Unit, Attached
2 Units
3 - 4 Units
5 - 9 Units
10 - 19 Units
20 Units or More
Mobile Home or Trailer

194
31

18
12

5

Age of Head

Husband-Wife Families:
Under 30 Years of Age
30 - 44 Years of Age
45 - 64 Years of Age
65 Years and Older
Other Family
Primary Individual

109

72
50
6
7
16

�Building Permit Activity Since 1968

HOUSING ERIE TOWNSHIP

Total New Living Units

New Commercial Units

Year

Total Units

Dollar Value

Year

Total Units

Dollar Value

1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973

13
14
16
37
28
32

$288,362
314,882
407,322
912,590
740,035
861,834

1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973

2
1
3
3
2
2

$120,000
7,400
70,169
53,900
32,548
30,985

Year

Total Units

Dollar Value

1968
1969
1970
1971
1972
1973

13
14
16
37
24
28

$288,362
314,882
407,322
912,590
663,003
801,411

Single Family Dwellings

Building Permit Activity, First Six Months of 1973

Total New Living Units

Commercial

Units

Dollar Value

Units

18

$482,002

2

Dollar Value

$30,985

Source: Monroe County Planning Commission

87

�ECONOMY ERIE TOWNSHIP

Persons By Labor Force Status

Persons Employed By Occupation

Armed Forces

Professional, Technica l and
Kind red Workers
Managers and Administrators,
except Farm
Sales
Clerica l and Kindred Wo rkers
Craf tsmen, Foremen &amp; Kin dred Workers
Operat ives
Laborers , Except Farm
Farm Managers
Service Workers
Priv ate HH D Workers
Farm Laborers

In Labor Force
Employed
Unemployed

1,582
1,482
100

Not in Labor Force
Under 65
Over 65 ·

1,1 9 1
957
234

Income of Families

Percent in Income Group :
Under $2,000
$2,000 - $3,999
$4,000 - $6,999
$7 ,000 - $9,999
$10,000 - $14,999
$ 15,000 - $24 ,999
$25,000 or more

7.3%
5.5%
9.5%
27.0%
31.5%
16.3%
2.6%

Income Of Unrelated Individuals

Percent in In come Groups:
Under $2,000
$2,000 - $3,999
$4,000 - $6 ,999
$7,000 - $9 ,999
$ 10,000- $14,999
$15,000 - $24,999
$25 ,000 or more

38. 1%
·17 .2%
21.9%
14.0%
6.5%
2.3%

Source : Monroe County Planning Commission

88

86
96
91
200
362
402
44
38
18
131
14

Persons Employed By Place of Work

Total at Work
Withi n Monroe County
Outside Monroe County
Toledo SMSA, Ohi o
Wood County, Oh io
Detro it
Other Wayne Cou nty
Oakland County
Macomb County
Washtenaw County
Lenawee County
Other
Not Reported

1,520
550
934
792
32
64

14
32
36

�Equalized Assessed Valuation

Real Property
Personal Property
Total Valuation

ECONOMY ERIE TOWNSHIP

1965

1970

1971

1972

1973

1974

$11,270,582
1,712,257
12,982,839

$13,892,397
2,492,494
16,384,891

$13,991,880
2,436,140
16,428,020

$1 5 ,622,860
2,446,698
18,069,558

$16,696,750
2,539,548
19 ,236,298

$18,027 ,565
2,672,875
20,700,440

Valuation By Property Class, Percent Of Total

1972

%

1973

1971

%

$4,536,276

27.61

$4,543,690

25.14

$4,856,450

25.25

$ 5,146,590

28.55

Commercial
Real
Personal

1,240,573
289,475

7.55
1.76

1,219,160
285,420

6.75
1.58

1,394,100
330,635

7.25
1.72

1,441,650
425,250

7.99
15.91

Industrial
Real
Personal

1,167,768
507,130

7.11
3.09

1,269,970
530,970

7.03
2.94

1,144,270
605,300

5.95
3.15

823,400
662 ,375

4.57
15.91

Residential
Real
Personal

7,047,264
432,200

42.90
2.63

8,590,040
438,150

47.54
2.42

9,301,930
406,700

48.35
2.11

10,615,925
385,850

58.89
14.44

Utility
Real
Personal

1,207,334

7.35

1,192,158

6.60

1,196,913

6.22

1,199,400

44.87

Agricultural
Real
Personal

%

1974

%

Source: Monroe County Planning Commission

89

�ERIE TOWNSHIP GOVERNMENT

Millage Rates
Compa rison For Years 1972 And 1973
School District

1972

1973

Mason School (09)
Custer School
(now Mason) (14)
Bedford School (03)
Mason/Bedford School (13)

35.80

35.60

35.05
47.67
38.52

34.82
47. 69
35.23

Township

1.00

1.00

South County Water

2.70

2.80

County

7.00

6.90

1.45
23.65

1.45
23.45

22.90
35.52
26.37

22.67
35.54
23.08

Levy ing Unit

Monroe Intermed iate
Mason School (09)
Custer Schoo l
(now Mason) (14)
Bedford School (03)
Mason/Bedford ( 13)

Source: Monroe County Equa li zat ion Department

90

�Zoning Areas

Acreage Zoned

ERIE TOWNSHIP ZONING AREAS*

Residential

R-1 Residence 1
R-2 Residence 2
R-3 Residence 3
RS-1 Residence Suburban

94 .96
1,146.85
355.98
653.40

Commercial

C-1 Commercial 1

391.96

Industrial

LM Light Manufacturing
GM General Manufacturing

1.38
1,515.40

Agricultural**

AG Agricultural

14,365.42

Total

18,525.35

*As of December 1973

*"' Includes vacant land, roads, streets and right-of-ways

Source: Monroe County Planning Commission

91

�ERIE TOWNSHIP LAND USE*

Erie Township
Residential
Single Family
Two Family
Multi-Family
Commercial
Industrial
Public and Ouasi Public
Parks, Recreation and Reserves
Agricultura l and Vacant
Orchards
Forested Tracts**
Farm Lots
Vacant
Tota l Land Use

Total Sites

Total Acreage

1,367
4
2

1,025.25
4 .00
2.00

1.6020
.0063
.0031

49

87.57

.1368

5

10.71

.0167

66

1,149.03

1.7954

7

162.64

.2541

164
10
(45)
87
67

16,084.15
194.34
(535 .60)
11,318.01
4,571.80

25.1315
.3037
(.8369)
17.6844
7.1434

18,525.35

28.9459

1,664

* As of December, 1973
**Forested land has been d istributed and counted among other land use categories.

Source: Monroe County Planning Commission

92

Total Square Miles

�PLANNING STANDARDS
Residenti al Neighborhood
Access Standards for Commun ity Facil ities With in The Neighborhood
Recommended Distance, with Maximum L imit

Wa lking Distance
(one way)
From Farthest
Dwe lling

Neighborhood Facility

¼ mile* or 15 min.
¼to½ mi le
t ¼to½ mi le
'¥ ¼to½ mi le
¼to½ m il e
¼to½ mi le
§ ½ mile
§ ½ mi le

Nursery schoo!
Kindergarten
Elementary school
Playgrou nd
Park
Shopping Center
Indoor social, cultural, and recreation center
Health Center

• Where nu rsery schoo l cannot be provided with in ¼ m ile, it shou ld at least be within 15 minutes elapsed time by
pu b I ic or special t ransit.

t In exceptiona l circumstances, the limit may be¾ mi le wa lk or 20 minutes elapsed time by school bus, if children
may obtain hot lunches at school at nom inal cost.
111 One-ha lf m il e perm iss ib le on ly in p lanned neighborhoods meeting al l requirements for safe access, and where
playground is adjacent to elementary school.
Where fac ili ty ca nnot be provided w it hin neighborhood or wa lking distance it shou ld at least be within 20
minutes elapsed t im e by pub li c transit.

Source:

Committee

on the

Hygiene of

Housing, American

Public

Health

Neighborhood, (Chicago: Public Administration Service, 1960), Table 5, p. 44.

Associat ion, Planning The

�PLANNING STANDARDS

Land Area of all Neighborhood Comm unity Fac iliti es Component Uses and Aggregate A rea,
by Type of Development and Population of Neighborhood *

Type of Development

1 ,000 persons
275 fami lies

2,000 persons
550 famil ies

3,000 persons
825 famil ies

4,000 person s
1,100 families

5,000 persons
1,375 fami lies

One or
two-family deve lopment*
Area in component uses
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

Acres in schoo l site
Acres in playground
Acres in park
Acres in shopping center
Acres in general
community faci litiest

1.20
2.75
1.50
.80

1.20
3.25
2.00
1.20

1.50
4 .00
2.50
2.20

1.80
5 .00
3.00
2 .60

2.20
6.00
3.50
3.00

.38

.76

1.20

1.50

1.90

6.63
6.63
1,050

8.41
4 .20
670

11.40
3.80
600

13.90
3.47
550

16.60
3.32
530

1.20
2.75
2.00
.80

1.20
3.25
3.00
1.20

1.50
4 .00
4 .00
2.20

1.80
5 .00
5.00
2 .60

2.20
6 .00
6.00
3.00

.38

.76

1.20

1.50

1.90

7 .13
7.13
1,130

9 .41
4 .70
745

12.90
4.30
680

15.90
3 .97
630

19.10
3.82
6 10

Aggregate area
6) Acres total
7) Acres per 1,000 persons
8) Square feet per family
Mult ifam il y deve lopment:j:
Area in component uses
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)

Acres in school site
Acres in playground
Acres in park
Acres in shopp ing center
Acres in genera l
community facil itiest

Aggregate area
6) Acres total
7) Acres per 1,000 persons
8) Squa re feet per fam il y

94

*With pr ivate lot area of less than 1/4 acre per fami ly (for private lots of 1/4 acre or more, park area may be omitted).
tA ll owance for indoor socia l and cultural facilities in Section 22 (chu rch, assemb ly ha ll , etc.) or separate health center, nursery
schoo l , etc., una ll ocated above. Need w ill vary loca ll y.
:j:Or othe r development predo min ant ly w ithout pr ivate ya rds.
Source: Comm ittee on Hygiene of H ousing, Ameri can Pub lic Hea lth Associat io n , Plann ing the Neighborhood (Chicago Public
Administration Service, 1960 ), T ab le 11, p. 53.

�PLANNING STANDARDS

Standards for Recreational Activities

Type of Recreation Activity

Space Requirements For
Activity Per Population

Ideal Size of Space
Required for Activity

Recreational Area Wherein
Activity May Be Located

Active Recreation
1. Children's Play Area
(with equipment)

0.5 acre/1,000 pop.

1 acre

2. Field Play Areas for
Young Children
3. Older Children-Adult Field
Sports Activities
4. Tennis-Outdoor Basketball
Other Court Sports
5. Swimming

1.5 acres/1,000 pop.

3 acres

1.5 acres/1,000 pop.

15 acres

1.0 acres/5,000 pop.

2 acres

1 outdoor pool/
25,000

competition size
plus wading pool
2 acres
100 acres
and over
500-1,000 acres

6. Major Boating Activities

7. Hiking-Camping-Horseback

100 acres/50,000
1O acres/ 1 ,000 pop .

Riding-Nature Study
8. Golfing

Playgrounds-Neighborhood Parks
Community Parks, School
Playgrounds
Playgrounds-Neighborhood Parks
Community Parks
Playfield Community Park
District Park
Playfield-Community Pc: rk
Playfield-Community Park

District Park-Regional Park or
Reservation
Large District Park-Regional Park

1-18 hole course
per 50,000 pop.

120 acres

Community Park -District Park

4 acres/1,000 pop.
1 Lake or Lagoon
per 25,000 pop.
1 acre/1,000 pop.

varies
20 acre
water area
100 acres

All parks
Community Park
Special Regional Reservations
Large District Park or
Special Facility

1. Parking at Recreational Areas

1 acre/1,000 pop.

varies

2. Indoor Recreation Centers
3. Outdoor Theaters , Band Shells

1 acre/10,000 pop
1 acre/25,000 pop.

1-2 acres
5 acres

Passive Recreat ion
1. Picknicking
2. Passive Water Sports
Fishing-Rowing Canoeing
3. Zoos, Arboretums .
Botanical Gardens
Other

Standards for Recreational Areas
Type of Area

Acres Per 1,000 Population

Playgrounds
Neighborhood Parks
Playfields

1.5
2.0
1.5

Community Parks
District Parks
Regional Parks and Reservations

3.5
2.0
15.0

Ideal

Playfields, Community, District &amp;
Regional Parks
Community Parks
District Parks

Size of Site
Minimum

4 acres
10
15
100
200
500-1,000

2 acres
5
10
40
100
var ies

Radius of Area Served
0.5 mi les
0.5
1.5
2.0

3.0
10.0

Source : George Nez, Standards for New Urban Development - The Denver Background, Reprinted by Permission of Urban Land.
Vol 20, No. 5 Urban Land Institute, 1200 18th Street . N.W. , Washington, D.C.

95

�PLANNING STANDARDS
Standards for Neighborhood and
Community Commercial Space

Population Served
Floor Area Required
(Sales Area)
Customer Parking Area
3: 1 Ratio
Circulation Service, and
Planting Areas 25%
Total Square Feet
Total Acres Required
Square Feet Per Family
(Gross)
Maximum Walking Distance

800 Families
2,500 Persons

1,600 Families
5,000 Persons

12,000-13,000 Families
40,000 Persons

30,000-32,000 Families
100,000 Persons

20 SF/Family=
16,000 SF

18 SF/Family=
28,800 SF

25 SF/Family=
100,000 SF

20 SF/Family=
200,000 SF

32,000 SF

57,600 SF

300,000 SF

600,000 SF

12,000 SF
60,000 SF
1.4 acres

36,400 SF
172,800 SF
4.0 acres

100,000 SF
500,000 SF
10-12 acres

200,000 SF
1,000,000 SF
20-24 acres

100
½ mile

38-42
1 mile walk
15-minute drive

32-36
1½ mile walk
30-minute drive

75
¼ mile

Food Market - Should include specialty foods and
delicatessen goods

Barber Shop - Including shoeshine service
Beauty Parlor - May be combined with barber shop

Bakery Shop - May be included in food market
Drugstore fountain

Should include lunch counter and soda

Laundry and Dry Cleaning Store - Combined service,
in cluding a laundromat
Hardware - Should include household goods

Stationery Store - In cluding reading matter, tobacco
and vanity goods
Restaurant orders

96

Including table service and take-out

In cluding filling station, minor
repairs, and auto accessories

Service Station -

�PLANNING STANDARDS

The community shopping center, designed to serve a larger number of families than the
neighborhood shopping center, will contain the basic types of services and facilities required by
the neighborhood. The leading tenant of the community shopping center is the variety or junior
department store. In addition, the center should have a florist, milliner, radio and T.V . repairs,
children's shoes, gifts, candy, lingerie, liquor, women's apparel, restaurant, book store, children's
wear and toys, haberdashery, athletic goods shops.
A movie theatre may also be included. A bank and post office should be included as a public
service, if they are not available elsewhere in the neighborhood. They do not pay well, any more
than service stores do, but often in a shopping center it is more important to have a balanced
variety of stores, than a group of 100% pu Ilers.
In order to make this truly a community center it may also be advisable to include offices for
doctors and other professional men. However, it is generally considered among developers that
office workers usurp a great deal of parking space all day without drawing sufficient trade to
compensate for this. Offices are generally put on the second floor of one of the store buildings,
or in a separate building which may be used as a ·buffer between the stores and the surrounding
residences.

Community Shopping Center

�PLANNING STANDARDS
Industrial

Basic Relationships :
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)

Working
Workers
Workers
Workers
Workers

35-40%
30-35%
60-70%
30-40%

Force as a percent of total population
in industrial areas as percentage of total working force
in Heavy Industry as percentage of workers in industrial area
in Light Industry as percentage of workers in industrial area
in basic industry (manufacture of goods for export from area as percentage of

10%

theoretical community size
Worker-Area Ratios :

Present Ratios
Expected Future Rat ios

Average Number of Workers Per Gross Acre of Industrial Land
Heavy Industry
Light Industry
Industrial Park
8
28
18
6
22
16

Land Requirement of Industry:
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)

Total
Land
Land
Land

Gross Land requirement for all Industry
requirements for Light Industry
requirements for Heavy Industry
requirements for pre-planned industrial complex (Industrial Park) : *

12 acres/1 ,000 population
2 acres/1,000 population
10 acres/1,000 population
Minimum 320 acres
ldeal640 acres

(e) Requirements for industrial land reserve :
reserve land for minimum of 50 years future growth

General Requirements for Industrial Location:
(a) Fast, easy and convenient access to good transportation facilities including rail , highway and air
(bl Reasonable location with respect to labor supply, raw materials source and markets
(c) An adequate amount of suitable land, free from foundation and drainage problems with a suffi cient reserve
for future growth
(d) An adequate and reliable supply of utilities : water, waste disposal, power and fuel
(e) Protection from encroachment of residential or other land uses
(f) Location so as to minimize obnoxious externa l effects on neighboring non-industrial land uses
SOURCE : George Nez, Standards for New Urban Development - The Denver Background Reprinted by
Permission of Urban Land, Vol. 20, No. 5 Urban Land Institute, 1200 18th Street, N.W., Washington, D.C.

98

�Erie Township Center

Proposed
Acres

Units Per
Acre

Total
Units

Persons
Per Unit

Total
Population

Single Family

34

3.5

11 9

3.4

405

Multi Family

36

6.0

216

2.6

562

PROJECTED DEVELOPMENT
CAPABILITIES

967

335
Halfway Creek Community

(a)

Sing le Fami ly

129

3.5

451

3.4

1,533

(b)

Mobi le Home

17

7 .0

119

2.2

262

(b)

Single Family

154

3.5

539

3.4

1,832

(c)

Single Family

50

3.5

17 5

3.4

595

1,284
Total Units
Total Population

4,222

1,619
5,189

Recreation &amp; Open Space

(a)

East of 1-75

5,040.0 acres

(b)

Halfway Creek

1,108.0 acres

(c)

North Erie

708 .0 acres

Source: Johnson, Johnson &amp; Roy /in c.

99

�RESULTS OF THE QUESTIONNAIRE CIRCULATED AMONG TOWNSH IP RESIDENTS *
There is a strong possib ility that the uses of land in Er ie T ownship will change substantia lly within the foreseeable
future. The population of the County and the Township w ill probab ly increase at a more rapid rate than in the
past. Th ese things bring up important quest ions that shou ld be answered by the people who live in Erie Townsh ip
and own property here. The Erie Township Plann ing Commission needs your answers to the follow ing questions
so that they can act on your-beha lf in the best interests of our Township.
1.

Did you know that there are certain lega l restrictions p laced on what property owners can do with their
land?
Yes
75
No
16

2.

Are
a.
b.
c.
d.
e.

3.

ls the present use of your land substantia ll y d ifferent from the use of the surrou nding lands?
Yes
10
No
79

4.

Wou ld you like to see Er ie Township
60
remain primar ily ag ricu ltura l/r ura l
6 become more suburbanized
25 urbanize with a full range of commercial , industria l and res idential activity

5.

Regarding the wet lands along Lake Erie and the various streams, do you want these areas to be used
primari ly for water re lated uses, such as marinas, public f ishing sites, boat docks, hunt ing areas, etc-7
Yes
84
No
6

6.

Do you use t he services ava ilab le within the t own of Er ie?
Yes
62
No
22

you presently us ing your property primari ly for:
residential purposes
67
agriculture
26
commercial
2
manufactur ing
recreational
4

Would you like its image improved and more activ it ies made ava i lab le7
Yes
59
No
28

100

7.

Would you like to see commercia l development encouraged at other places in the township?
Yes
49
No
37

8.

Have you had any problem with your drinking water or sewage disposa l because of the heavy rains and
f looding last fa ll and spri ng?
Yes
19
No
72

9.

Do you th ink sewers should be considered for areas hav ing a h igh water tab le or where there are many
residences and buildings7
Yes
40
No
47

10.

Wou ld you favor having some land that is now be ing farmed zoned so that only agriculture is al lowed 7 This
m ight mean t hat the on ly bu il d in gs all owed in t hese areas wou ld be t hose the farmer needs tor his business.
Yes
66
No
19

11.

In what part of Erie Township do you live?
* T abulation as of 12/ 18/73

�Bibliography

Dorr, John A., Jr. and Donald F. Eschman, Geology of Michigan, 1970, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor,
Michigan.
Earthview, Incorporated, "Preliminary Pollution Survey - Hagman Road Landfill, Erie Township, Michigan,"
Toledo, Ohio, 1973, Typescript.
Lavoy, Lambert, "Bay Settlement of Monroe County, Michigan," 1971.
Michigan Geological Survey, "Our Rock Riches," Bulletin 1, 1964, Lansing, Michigan.
Mazola, Andrew J., "Geology for Environmental Planning in Monroe County, Michigan," Michigan Geological
Survey, Investigation 13, 1970, Lansing, Michigan.
Office of Lucas County Engineer, "Storm Drainage in the Toledo Regional Area," Regional Report 9 3, 1969,
Toledo, Ohio.
Twenter, Floyd, "General Availability and Quality of Groundwater in the Bedrock Deposits in Michigan," Water
Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey, Lansing, Michigan, map.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, "Soil Survey of Monroe County," 1970, Monroe,
Michigan.
Vaughan, R.D. and G.L. Marlow, 1965, "Report on Pollution of the Detroit River, Michigan Waters of Lake Erie,
and their Tributaries," U.S. Department of Health, Education &amp; Welfare, Public Health Service, Region V, Grosse
lie, Michigan.
Wandell, Howard D., "A Biological and Limnological Survey of a Sulfur Spring and Constructed Trout Stream,"
M.S. Thesis, Michigan State University, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, 1973, Lansing, Michigan.

�Planning Commission

Term of Office

Harold Mensing
Chairman

8/12/76
9/11 /73
Elected 6/18/74

Nei I Cousino
Vice Chairman

8/12/77
8/12/69
Elected 1/16/73

Ted Norts
Chairman
Secretary

5/16/74
1/16/73
Elected 10/1/74

Floyd Asbury
Ernest Buschmann
James Cousino
Ted Dickerson
Richard Peters
Wi lbur Smith

5/8/73
2/2/74
5/8/73
2/26/74
6/11 /74
1/28/57

8/12/76
8/12/77
8/12/75
8/12/77
8/12/75
8/12/75

4/11 /72
3/9/71
12/12/72
11 /20/72

2/12/74
1/14/74
8/12/73
9/10/74

Former Members (1972-74)

Alfred Cousino
Robert Ball
A lex Ortiz
Jeanne Pasternak

102

Township Board

Former Treasurer

Planning Coordinator

John W. Beutler, Supervisor
Jeanne M. Pasternak
Ted L. Norts, Treasurer
Martin J. Burgard, Trustee
James W. O'Neill, Trustee

Franklin J. Barron

Terry L. Jurrens ( 1973-1974, October)
William M. Cline (1974, November - )

�WW~iT#li:lffili\l•~

t

.:~~:~~i&amp;~t=wv -;•:::•:=;&gt;511£

?
,· ' 1

) '
n_,,,I

it~:(c
'

6~\\__;
'*':t

,J?_'--

[,._,,-:,

-•;
,,

"

111
:,:¥ ,-r~1-:....
t@ ;, .. :. ·.. ; .

;?
,-J

L

'·,
-~

J

..)

WOOi•

UNA

RESlDENTIA
SPECIAL RES1

~

~

\..__~((,S'

PE-TEE-

""\~ ~,.. .
-~
; 'St.\ .
- -~
- ...:-.;... 9-;

.

- - . ;;;.._ • 6.fil

:J

-

,

:... • 11

•..

-

7:.,m.

SINGLE FAMli

I

~--:~~~

'i,)

~;l
Gt

J

!

~,;

MOBILEHOM

-::,:.

CITY
OF
•)

LUNA

Nf

'"·--~L.\ ERIE

MULTI-FAMI

NEIGHBORH

PIER
ROAD

Consumers
Power Plant

..

HIGHWAY CQ

PARKS,OPE

INDUSTRIAU

I

AGRICULTU
AGRICULTU

r-:

i . .= -··.=
. ,· ·;.-....
.. :-,
.

l;l!
l~i

{

LAND ARE
SEPTIC SYS

1

J

,~__,,,,~
l.

1---1
•

'-..)",...)

'\

~
sffoAD

I

UTILITY Lil

COMMUNIT
MAJOR ROA

SCHOOLS

'

/

POTENTIA
RESIDENT\
SEWER SY
EXCEl?TIO

BENORE ROAD

Nori h M oumee Boy

C' ___ /

::iv

WATEII

c-)

Island

;

Lost

Pt111insu/a

Marino

TREAT
PLANT

/

ii!;

il:i

~

ROAD

11"' I

GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

0

ERIE TOWNSHIP
MONROE COUNTY
December, 1974

'

MICHIGAN

JJR

Johnson, Johnson &amp; Roy/ inc
303 N. Main Street
Ann J

�~

rrI
)'--//

-

- ❖·:tl'-!J\::~ ·:e.:._J!ffiif4.?l\❖::-~__ =-::~:_. -N
fJ.thllt.bITu./::Ji&amp;~=·:r W
v 4 u----._"-. ..,-1 r-::...---::
,,- _ )·
'-'

"'-:'.--

/ -~

~j

"\

c,

I

.

',

-~

\
\~

'

'
'

&gt;

,

·:•~=••··-·-

--~

(

LAKE
i'

mm

ERIE

RESIDENTIAL FLOODPLAIN SPECIAL RESTRICTIONS APPLY

-

MOBILE HOMES RESIDENTIAL
SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

[

)

MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
NEIGHBORHOOD COMMERCIAL
HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL

au

Consumers
Power Plant

WATER RELATED COMMERCIAL

PARKS,OPEN SPACE &amp; TREES

1

11

-

AGRICULTURAL@ FLOOD PLAIN

1

r ••
•.

INDUSTRIAL

• •
• •'• I• I'•,•

i : • •,.. ·I ~ • •.

1
1

AGRICULTURAL
LAND AREAS SUITABLE FOR
SEPTIC SYSTEMS
POTENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL REQUIRING
SEWER SYSTEM OR
EXCEPTIONALLY LARGE LOTS

1---1
1

•

UTILITY LINES- ELECTRIC

1 COMMUNITY FACILITIES BUILDING

)

MAJOR ROADS

SCHOOLS

North M oumee Soy

Island

Losl
P•lllnsu/a

Marina

~
0

JJR

1 Mile

Johnson, Johnson &amp; Roy/inc. Landscape Architects
303 N. Main Street
Ann Arbor, Michigan
48104

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008191">
                <text>Erie-Twp_General-Development-Plan_1974</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008192">
                <text>Johnson, Johnson &amp; Roy/inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008193">
                <text>1974-12-12</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008194">
                <text>General Development Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008195">
                <text>The General Development Plan for Erie Township was prepared by Johnson, Johnson &amp; Roy/inc. and was approved by the Monroe County Planning Commission on December 12, 1974.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008196">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008197">
                <text>Erie Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008198">
                <text>Monroe County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008199">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008201">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008202">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008203">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008204">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038318">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54692" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58963">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/2263b232d17174909bbf306f08f54ff7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>b11ca7ae496e7baebf189de03f54174f</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008190">
                    <text>Village of Empire - Zoning Districts

Village of Empire
Leelanau County

µ

S PARK ST

W FLORENCE
ST

Leelanau County, Michigan

S ZELMER RD

South
Bar Lake

DR

Y

CH A PPLE L N

W SOUTH ST

F IL
LBY R
T

L

W
S ROEN RD

S ONTARIO ST

W MICHIGAN ST

S LEELANAU HWY

S

S BAR

W AYLSWORTH ST

W O OD ST

W MICHIGAN ST

S LAKE S T

MH
ILL D
R

NT

W WILCE ST

S ERIE ST

W WILCE ST

ORCH
ARD HI
L L DR

CE
ES
CR

W

W
EH
P IR
EM

W FRONT ST

DR

S

Y

S

S UNION ST

S LARUE ST

AT
CH

W NIAGARA ST

W
S

OR

ST
S

AN

W

T

W PHILLIP ST

W PIT

EL

H

DR

W SALISBURY ST

W LAMBKIN LN

LL
HI

LE

AU

W O T TAWA AVE

SS
UN
SE

S REYNOLDS ST

Lake Michigan

S

S LACORE RD

S LA
KE M
ICHI
GAN

DR

W FISHER ST

R A CK ST

W WASHINGTON ST

LC
S WI

S W IS
NI

O

D

R

EW

SK
D
IR

-

Village Residential

General Residential

--

Mixed Residential

Gateway Corridor District

Adopted: 11/14/19; Effective: 11/25/19

--

Front Street District

Recreation/Conservation

-

Planned Unit Development
Light Industrial

This map is prepared by Leelanau County for reference purposes only. Leelanau County is not liable for any errors that may be found herein.

1 inch = 800 feet
RHerman_1.9.2020

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008174">
                <text>Empire_Zoning-Map_2019</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008175">
                <text>Leelanau County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008176">
                <text>2019-11-25</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008177">
                <text>Village of Empire-Zoning Districts</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008178">
                <text>The Village of Empire-Zoning Districts map was prepared by Leelanau County and is effective as of November 25, 2019.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008179">
                <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008180">
                <text>Zoning--Map</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008181">
                <text>Empire (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008182">
                <text>Empire Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008183">
                <text>Leelanau County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008184">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008186">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008187">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008188">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008189">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038317">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54691" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58962">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/29adcd7394ea0b73bf46ab374ae3b3c4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>1804a981260ae72776df3c21e167fdf2</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008173">
                    <text>ÿ

ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

ÿ
3456ÿ89 ÿ5 �� 9���ÿ��ÿ��9�ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

0ÿ

�ÿ

2345ÿ7899 ÿ�ÿ���8�ÿ� ���ÿ�9�ÿ
�������!"# �$%ÿ

'#()*ÿS)��-"ÿ.�T��)�ÿÿ

'#()*ÿ,�-��)�"ÿ.�##)%%)��ÿÿ

O F�ÿ1F9�E ��=5ÿ���80��ÿ
� 8ÿ34�ÿ
I�ÿ3��5ÿ���80��ÿ?234U7234@Aÿ
IJ��ÿ&lt;�����ÿ
&gt; �ÿ&gt; 28�ÿ
&lt;=�8�ÿ:�Fÿ
/��ÿD E �ÿ
/�ÿB0� 4=�ÿ
3�F9ÿI;�4;8ÿ
� ÿIQ�ÿ

/00ÿ128�ÿ
� 8ÿ34�5ÿ�678948ÿ
:��;ÿ&lt;9� ���ÿ
�=89ÿ&gt; �8�ÿ?&lt;=8�5ÿ234@Aÿ
B 998ÿC� �8�ÿ
/��ÿD E �ÿ
B�0FÿG 9��ÿ?&lt;=8�5ÿ234HAÿ
IJÿ�9� �ÿ?&lt;=8�5ÿ2345Aÿ
/�ÿB0� 4=�ÿ
���ÿI=J�ÿ

'#()*ÿK-%$*ÿ,�-�ÿ.�##)L ÿÿ

/00ÿ128�ÿ
� 8ÿ34�ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿM8�ÿ3 9Nÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ:��;ÿ&lt;9� ���ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ�=89ÿ&gt; �8�ÿ
B 998ÿC� �8�ÿ
/��ÿD E �ÿ
B�0FÿG 9��ÿ
IJÿ�9� �ÿ
/�ÿB0� 4=�ÿ
���ÿI=J�ÿ
I=8�9Fÿ/�JFÿ
� ÿO 9��P&lt;=8�ÿ

ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

ÿ
ÿ

ÿ
ÿ

ÿ
ÿ

ÿ
ÿ

ÿ
ÿ

ÿ
ÿ

ÿÿ ÿÿ ÿ
ÿ

0ÿ

ÿ

VWXYZWX[ÿ]^_`ÿZaa^a_ZbcXÿdWefÿÿ
1 Networks

Northwest

Talent / Business / Co

:���ÿ&lt;2�ÿ&lt;�Q �Rÿ78Eÿ�ÿ���8�ÿ39JNÿ

�ÿ

=&gt;?@AÿCDÿECFGAFGHÿ
ÿ

2345678ÿÿ68������ÿ
2345678ÿ�ÿ����� �ÿ2������ÿ�ÿ2�67�6ÿ
2345678ÿ�ÿ�46�84�ÿ�7���8�7�
2345678ÿ!ÿ"�4��6#ÿ�$ÿ%�$7ÿ�ÿ&amp;7�7ÿ�$ÿ'�4�7ÿ
2345678ÿ)ÿ2�8876ÿ�ÿ*�6�87ÿ%4�ÿ+�7ÿ
2345678ÿ(ÿ,����-ÿ.�4��-ÿ�ÿ/017��27�ÿ
2345678ÿ�ÿ35�73764��ÿ
ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

4557���ÿ4ÿ��4�787�ÿ&amp;57��7�ÿ
4557���ÿ6ÿ$84�68��6�87ÿ745�ÿ
4557���ÿ2ÿ�8�ÿ74�678ÿ'�4ÿ�464ÿ
4557���ÿ9ÿ:���ÿ;40�7ÿ&lt;��37���7ÿ�$ÿ87���4���ÿ
4557���ÿÿ�ÿ�7�874��ÿ'�4ÿ
4557���ÿ*ÿ;84�5�864��ÿ'�4ÿ

0ÿ

�ÿ
�ÿ
�ÿ
�(ÿ
!ÿ
)(ÿ
()ÿ
ÿ

(5ÿ
(ÿ
�ÿ
�)ÿ
�(ÿ
8!ÿ

�ÿ

2345678ÿ 3 7ÿ3��ÿ�3�7ÿ
�����ÿ�ÿ
�����ÿ(ÿ
�����ÿ2ÿ
�����ÿ7ÿ
�����ÿ*ÿ

��������ÿ!"�#�ÿ�$%&amp;ÿÿ'ÿ(&amp;�)ÿ
+#�ÿ,-./0-����ÿ
3��.�ÿ4 -/.ÿ5ÿ6��.���ÿ3��.-#ÿ
89�:�ÿ,-./0-���� ÿ
;������ÿ!��/&lt;ÿ;���0ÿ=�09�ÿ5ÿÿ
4 �:���&lt;:�/ÿ
�����ÿ)ÿ + ���ÿ3��.�"��&gt;ÿ6�0?-?��ÿ@�&gt;#�/ÿ
�����ÿ%ÿ ;������ÿ!��/&lt;ÿ3��.-#ÿ6/��.�9.ÿ

�*ÿ
�1ÿ
�1ÿ
�$ÿ
�$ÿ
(�ÿ
((ÿ

�����ÿ1ÿ ;������ÿ!��/&lt;ÿA9��:-9ÿB?�0?-�Cÿ (7ÿ
�����ÿ$ÿ 6����-#ÿ@��0ÿ,� �.ÿD�����ÿ;�E�."�0�ÿ7&amp;ÿ
F-.-/���ÿ
!"�0/ÿ�ÿ A9��:-9ÿ8:��9/ÿ�Gÿ6����-#ÿ@��0ÿ,��.ÿ7&amp;ÿ
D�����ÿ;�E�."�0�ÿ
H��ÿ�I�ÿ ;�9���ÿH��JF-���#�ÿ�GÿA:�-0�ÿ 1ÿ

0ÿ

�ÿ

3456ÿ89 ÿ5 �� 9���ÿ��ÿ��9�ÿ
ÿ

ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
0ÿ

�ÿ

ABCDEFGÿIJÿKLEGMNOPQMLÿ
012345ÿ789ÿ3 42485�ÿ89ÿ8ÿ�3��8�5ÿ3ÿ�����ÿ��5ÿ
43�38�ÿ�3��8�5ÿ8�ÿ7 ÿ8��3� 9ÿ7545ÿ2�8�5�ÿ3ÿ
�����ÿ�ÿ�8ÿ�15ÿ3ÿ789ÿ8ÿ��9�3�ÿ��1�54ÿ 7 ÿ73�ÿ
8ÿ98713��ÿ8�ÿ�8�3�ÿ7�84ÿ ÿ!8"5ÿ#3�3�8ÿ$�9ÿ
9��ÿÿ%��ÿ&amp;84ÿ!8"5�ÿ�ÿ�5ÿ�4ÿÿ�5ÿ5 �4'(ÿ
012345ÿ�8�ÿ8ÿ22��8� ÿÿ)*��ÿ�+54ÿ�5ÿ��1�54ÿ13��ÿ
��45�ÿ�7 ÿ3ÿ���,(ÿ�5ÿ22��8� ÿ5��ÿ9�842�'(ÿ
�545893�ÿ ÿ�599ÿ�8ÿ-**ÿ252�5ÿ�'ÿ���*�ÿ.ÿ�5ÿ7 ÿ
�58�59ÿ��73�ÿ/ 4��ÿ/84ÿ..(ÿ�4ÿ �54ÿ
9���3�393 9ÿ7545ÿ2�8�5��ÿ��595ÿ3 ���5�ÿ%��ÿ&amp;84ÿ
%�459ÿ8�ÿ&amp;8 09ÿ9���3�393 9ÿ� 85�ÿ8� �ÿ!8145ÿ
%455(ÿ89ÿ75��ÿ89ÿ!8"5�357ÿ8�ÿ%�95ÿ9���3�393 9ÿ
� 85�ÿ8ÿ!8145ÿ8�ÿ#2���ÿ
# 9ÿÿ�5ÿ584�'ÿ95��549ÿ7545ÿ899 385�ÿ73�ÿ�5ÿ
� 8�ÿ��1�54ÿ3��94'�ÿ�+54ÿ�5ÿ�1�54�8�9ÿ7545ÿ
584�'ÿ8��ÿ� 5ÿ8�ÿ�5ÿ98713��ÿ�95�(ÿ�5ÿ�3��8�5ÿ�9ÿ
1��ÿÿ39ÿ22��8� ÿ89ÿ18'ÿ252�5ÿ1 �5�ÿ ÿ
3�59(ÿ4ÿ ÿ57ÿ8419ÿ4�15958�95ÿ3ÿ�5ÿ
9�44��3�ÿ8458�ÿ
��5ÿ584�'ÿ�3��8�5ÿ4593�5 9ÿ3 ���5�ÿ252�5ÿ ÿ8ÿ�8435'ÿ
ÿ8� 8�3�59(ÿ3 ���3�ÿ.439�(ÿ% 9(ÿ645 �(ÿ
%8�38�38(ÿ8�ÿ&amp;5��38�ÿ��595ÿ252�5ÿ9845�ÿ
��9359959(ÿ4�84�9(ÿ8�ÿ8419(ÿ7�3�ÿ�5548��'ÿ
18�5ÿ8ÿ9� 599��ÿ4893� ÿ41ÿ8ÿ��1�543�ÿ
9�2245�ÿ�3�5�3� �ÿ ÿ �54ÿ �28� 9�ÿ
.ÿ�5ÿ���*09(ÿ012345ÿ�5815ÿ�5ÿ935ÿÿ8ÿ�34ÿ645ÿ
�895ÿ�8ÿ24�3�5�ÿ915ÿ512�'15 ÿ224�3�59ÿ
8�ÿ� 95�ÿ�5ÿ�3��8�5ÿ22��8� ÿ�'ÿ-**�ÿ��5ÿ�895ÿ
789ÿ98�5�ÿ�7 (ÿ8�ÿ�5ÿ2�895�ÿ�ÿ3ÿ����(ÿ��ÿ
18'ÿÿ�5ÿ45�45�ÿ2549 5�ÿ�8�5ÿ451835�ÿ3ÿ�5ÿ
8458�ÿ��5ÿ 4154ÿ�34ÿ645ÿ�895ÿ 7ÿ954�59ÿ89ÿ8ÿ
8� 8�ÿ284"ÿ183 58 5ÿ83�3'(ÿ73�ÿ35ÿ9589 8�ÿ
8�ÿ'58424��ÿ��93�ÿ�39ÿ ÿ�5ÿ935�ÿ���3� 8��'(ÿ
5ÿ65�548�ÿ��38� ÿ��133948� ÿ48�84ÿ�15ÿ
451839ÿ3ÿ2548� ÿ ÿ�39ÿ 4154ÿ�34ÿ645ÿ�895�ÿ
��5ÿ78� 8�ÿ884"ÿ%54�35ÿ478%5ÿ39ÿ8ÿ�393��5(ÿ39�5�8�ÿ
284ÿ ÿ�5ÿ�3��8�5ÿÿ012345�ÿ��5ÿ%�5523�ÿ&amp;584ÿ:�59ÿ
bÿ

STUVWTXYÿÿ[\]TÿU^ÿÿS_`\VYÿÿ

78� 8�ÿ!8"59�45ÿ789ÿ418��'ÿ598��39�5�ÿ3ÿ��,*�ÿ
%3 5ÿ;8�84'ÿÿ���,(ÿ�5ÿ78%ÿ8�133948��5ÿ&lt; 59ÿÿ
8�ÿ�393 4ÿ15 54ÿ�8�5ÿ25485�ÿ3ÿ8ÿ�5895�ÿ��3��3�ÿ
ÿ�5ÿ58954ÿ5��5ÿÿ�5ÿ�3��8�5�ÿ
012345ÿ39ÿ8ÿ�3��8�5ÿÿ-,�ÿ'58424��ÿ4593�5 9(ÿ
8 4�3�ÿ ÿ�5ÿ�*�)ÿ�15438ÿ111�3'ÿ%�4�5'�ÿ
��5ÿ�3��8�5ÿ 9399ÿÿ95�548�ÿ918��ÿ9589 8�ÿ92538�'ÿ
9�29(ÿ84�989(ÿ4598�48 9(ÿ�849(ÿ�8"9(ÿ24 5993 8�ÿ
&lt; 59(ÿ8�ÿ8ÿ�8435'ÿÿ4583�ÿ��9359959ÿ ÿ155ÿ�5ÿ
5�54'�8'ÿ55�9ÿÿ�5ÿ'58424��ÿ4593�5 9�ÿ
��5ÿ24595 ÿ5 13ÿ�895ÿ ÿ012345ÿ39ÿ�5ÿ5�542
�473�ÿ �4391ÿ3��94'�ÿ��5ÿ�3��8�5ÿ39ÿ59�5�ÿ3ÿ�5ÿ
13�9ÿÿ�5ÿ%�5523�ÿ&amp;584ÿ:�59ÿ78� 8�ÿ!8"59�45(ÿ
7�3�ÿ8�48 9ÿ584�'ÿ��,ÿ13��3 ÿ�393 49ÿ'584�'�ÿ��439ÿ
�3938� ÿ59�1859ÿ�8�5ÿ4395ÿ8 �8��'ÿ93 5ÿ���=�ÿ
��43���45(ÿ9253&gt;8��'ÿ822�5ÿ8�ÿ�544'ÿ4�84�9(ÿ
�8�5ÿ48�3� 8��'ÿ�55ÿ8�ÿ � �5ÿ ÿ�5ÿ8ÿ
31248 ÿ9�45ÿÿ� 8�ÿ512�'15 �ÿ#8'ÿ012345ÿ
4593�5 9ÿ 11�5ÿ�83�'ÿ ÿ�5ÿ�48�5495ÿ13'ÿ8458�ÿ.ÿ39ÿ
8�9ÿÿ31248 ÿ ÿ 5ÿ�8ÿ012345ÿ�89ÿ8ÿ�473�ÿ
�1�54ÿÿ45�4559�ÿ���ÿ�595ÿ8 49ÿ1�9ÿ�5ÿ"52ÿ3ÿ
13�ÿ7�3�5ÿ2�8 3�ÿ01234509ÿ��45�ÿ
1�8�5ÿ73��ÿ � �5ÿ ÿ �4�ÿ�ÿ59�45ÿ�8ÿ�95ÿ
�8�59ÿ245954�5ÿ8�ÿ5�8 5ÿ012345?9ÿ1 9ÿ
�5439�5�ÿ@�8�3�59(ÿ�5ÿ 11�3'ÿ1�9ÿ2�8ÿ8�ÿ
2452845ÿ4ÿ�8�5�ÿÿ

�ÿ

3455678ÿ ÿ �4�8ÿ
ÿ

Loe.art.ion Map~ Villa1ge of Empire
Fteure M

L~lanau Count.y

·,.../'

j

-~

~ _r.\

I -

r~/ D

'

;f'\_ ~-+--

..

EI-:1:8
5ta.'t6 of Mlo,h'lgan

0ÿ

�ÿ
ÿ
2��ÿ�#%����ÿ�0ÿ���ÿ4'��%�ÿ5����"�ÿ6����%ÿ7���ÿ��ÿ��ÿ
"#�$�ÿ0#�#%�ÿ$�!����'���ÿ��$ÿ����"�ÿ����%$��"ÿ��ÿ���ÿ
��''#���-9�ÿ�%��%���.ÿÿ
2��ÿ7���ÿ��ÿ�����$�$ÿ��ÿ�%�!�$�ÿ0�%:ÿÿ
;ÿ =�&gt;?@ AÿAB787?�8Cÿ2��ÿ6����%ÿ7���ÿ�%�!�$��ÿ�ÿ
���,���ÿ���"D��%'ÿ,����ÿ0�%ÿ��0�%'�$ÿ$�������D
'�*��".ÿ/���-���ÿ�0ÿ�E���"ÿ���$�����ÿ��',���$ÿ
����ÿ���ÿ"����ÿ��$ÿ��������ÿ����ÿ�%�ÿ�#�����$ÿ��ÿ���ÿ
7����ÿ����ÿ"#�$�ÿ���ÿ7������"ÿF�''������ÿ��$ÿ
5����"�ÿF�#����ÿ��ÿ���-ÿ�����$�%ÿ8����"�ÿ���ÿ
$�!����'����ÿ�������ÿ�'�%�!�'�����ÿ��$ÿ����%ÿ
'�G�%�ÿ%����"ÿ��ÿ���$ÿ#��ÿ��$ÿ$�!����'���.ÿÿ
;ÿ HIJ@7K7�Lÿ=�M85@ �58Cÿ2��ÿ7���ÿ�%�!�$��ÿ0�%ÿ
���%$�����ÿ�0ÿ�#,���ÿ�'�%�!�'����ÿ��$ÿ�%�!���ÿ
$�!����'����ÿ��$ÿ����ÿ�����ÿ���ÿ5����"�ÿ�%��%�8�ÿ
�'�%�!�'����ÿ��ÿ��''#���-ÿ0�������.ÿÿÿ
;ÿ A7B54N775OCÿ2��ÿ6����%ÿ7���ÿ��0�%'�ÿ��8����ÿ
�%���%�-ÿ����%��ÿ��$ÿ���"�,�%��"ÿ��''#����ÿ�0ÿ
���ÿ5����"�9�ÿ�%��%���ÿ��$ÿ"�����ÿ��ÿ����ÿ��ÿ���%�ÿ
��$ÿ���ÿ���ÿ��''#���-ÿ��ÿ�E�����$ÿ��ÿ"%��P
�������"ÿ���'ÿ��ÿ����ÿ0�%ÿ���ÿ#��ÿ�0ÿ�%���%�-ÿ��ÿ�ÿ
��-ÿ����ÿ��ÿ����������ÿ����ÿ���ÿ��''#���-9�ÿ!�����.ÿÿ
;ÿ Q?�7�LCÿ2��ÿ6����%ÿ7���ÿ�%�!�$��ÿ���ÿ��"��ÿ
0�#�$���ÿ0�%ÿ8����".ÿ2��ÿ6����"��ÿR����"ÿ
4��,���"ÿ/��ÿ%�S#�%��ÿ���ÿ8����"ÿ�%$������ÿ,�ÿ
,���$ÿ��ÿ�ÿ����ÿ$���"��$ÿ��ÿ'���ÿ%���$����9ÿ���$�ÿ
0�%ÿ���#%��ÿ%���#%����ÿ��#���"�ÿ%��%�����ÿ��$#��%-�ÿ
,#�������ÿ��%!����ÿ��$ÿ����%ÿ#���.ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

2345ÿ78ÿ4ÿ9485 ÿ4��ÿ

4��7�Lÿ ?B88ÿ

2��ÿ4'��%�ÿ5����"�ÿ6����%ÿ7���ÿ���ÿ$�!�����$ÿ,-ÿ���ÿ
4'��%�ÿ5����"�ÿ7������"ÿF�''������ÿ��ÿTUVT�ÿ��$ÿ
#�$���$ÿ��ÿTUVW.ÿ7#,���ÿ���#�ÿ���ÿ����%��ÿ��ÿ���ÿTUVTÿ
7���ÿ��$ÿ���ÿTUVWÿ#�$���ÿ����ÿ����%�#����ÿ0�%ÿ
��%������ÿ��%�#"�ÿ�#%!�-��ÿ��''�G��ÿ'���"��ÿ
��$ÿ0�%#'�.ÿ7#,���ÿ���#�ÿ0�%ÿ���ÿTUVWÿ#�$���ÿ���ÿ
�,�����$ÿ��%�#"�ÿ�ÿ�%�G��ÿ�#%!�-ÿ��$ÿ�#,���ÿ0�%#'�ÿ
���$ÿ��ÿ/#"#��ÿTUVXÿ��$ÿ6�%��ÿTUVY.ÿÿ7���ÿ"�����ÿ
�,Z��!���ÿ��%���"����ÿ��$ÿ0#�#%�ÿ���$ÿ#��ÿ
%���''��$����ÿ��%�ÿ$�!�����$ÿ,���$ÿ��ÿ�#,���ÿ
���#�ÿ�,�����$ÿ��%�#"��#�ÿ���ÿ�%������ÿ����-���ÿ�0ÿ
�E���"ÿ���$�����ÿ��$ÿ�%�!��#�ÿ�%ÿ%�����$ÿ�����ÿ��$ÿ
��#$���.ÿ2��ÿ7���ÿ���ÿ�%���%�$ÿ��ÿ����%$����ÿ����ÿ
�%�!������ÿ�0ÿ���ÿ6����"��ÿ7������"ÿ4��,���"ÿ/��ÿ
[7#,���ÿ/��ÿ\\ÿ�0ÿTUUY]ÿ��ÿ�������ÿ��$ÿ�%�����ÿ���ÿ
�������ÿ��0��-�ÿ��$ÿ���0�%�ÿ�0ÿ���ÿ��8���.ÿÿÿ
HL4�7K4J?�ÿ?&gt;ÿ53ÿ4�ÿ
2��ÿ4'��%�ÿ5����"�ÿ6����%ÿ7���ÿ�%�!�$��ÿ�!�%!����ÿ�0ÿ
�E���"ÿ���$����1ÿ$���#�����ÿ�0ÿ�#,���ÿ���#�1ÿ
�$�� ^����ÿ�0ÿ���#��ÿ��$ÿ����%�#����ÿ�#%%�#�$��"ÿ
$�3�%���ÿ���'����ÿ�0ÿ���ÿ��''#���-1ÿ"�����ÿ�,Z��!���ÿ
����ÿ�����'����ÿ��$ÿ�'���'������ÿ��%���"���.ÿ
_���%�� ���ÿ�0ÿ,���ÿ�%������ÿ%���!���ÿ�%�"%�'��ÿ��$ÿ
%���#%���ÿ�%�ÿ��"���"���$ÿ��%�#"��#�ÿ���ÿ7���.ÿ2��ÿ
7���ÿ��ÿ$�!�$�$ÿ����ÿ������ÿ��$ÿ������%�ÿ��ÿ0������:ÿÿ
`aÿ=�5?AbBJ?�ÿ�%�!�$��ÿ��ÿ�!�%!���ÿ�0ÿ���ÿ����ÿ��$ÿ
�%�����.ÿÿ
caÿde78J�Lÿf?�A7J?�8ÿ4�Aÿf?�5e5ÿ$���#����ÿ4'��%�9�ÿ
�����%-�ÿ���ÿ�����ÿ��ÿg������#ÿF�#��-ÿ��$ÿ���ÿ

�����ÿ���ÿ������ÿ����������ÿ�����ÿ!����"���ÿ��#� ���ÿ��$ÿ%�"����ÿ��ÿ�%����ÿ&amp;'����%ÿ�����(ÿ����ÿ'�*�ÿ%���''��$�+
���ÿ�,�#�ÿ��''#���-ÿ���#��ÿ��*�ÿ�#,���ÿ��%!�����ÿ��#���"�ÿ���#%��ÿ%���#%����ÿ��$ÿ�%�����%����ÿ���$�.ÿ/ÿ'����%ÿ
����ÿ$���ÿ���ÿ��!�ÿ���ÿ%#��ÿ�0ÿ���1ÿ������$�ÿ��ÿ����ÿ��ÿ�ÿ"#�$�ÿ0�%ÿ"�!�%�'����ÿ��$ÿ����%ÿ��''#���-ÿ��%���%�ÿ��ÿ#��ÿ
����ÿ'�*��"ÿ$��������.ÿ2�ÿ,�ÿ�3��!��ÿ���ÿ4'��%�ÿ5����"�ÿ6����%ÿ7���ÿ'#��ÿ,�ÿ�#�ÿ����ÿ�%����ÿ��%�#"�ÿ��%���%+
�����ÿ����ÿ��''#�����ÿ�%"���8�����ÿ��$ÿ�����ÿ"�!�%�'���ÿ#����.ÿ
ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

1ÿ

�ÿ

3456789ÿ8ÿ6�4ÿ���ÿ34ÿ34�4�8�ÿ�37 ÿ��4ÿ
�4��3��ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿ�7���86��9ÿ68���685ÿ
4�753��6�ÿ8ÿ4�787�6�ÿ6�4�ÿÿ
��ÿ�����!ÿ#$%&amp;�'$%ÿ�37�64ÿ8ÿ7�43�64(ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿ
8��3�ÿ�4��34ÿ�7�8ÿ(6��68ÿ��4ÿ)6��54�ÿÿ
*�ÿ+��!,�-ÿ&amp;.ÿ/,.$ÿ�01ÿ2$0%$ÿ&amp;.ÿ3!�'$ÿ6�� 4ÿ��4ÿ
�7���86��4ÿ���456 4ÿ8ÿ7��6��ÿ7�ÿ�6�4ÿ 4��ÿÿ
8�ÿ/�01ÿ9%$ÿ��� 36:4ÿ��4ÿ��3��439ÿ���49ÿ8ÿ
�7�;78ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿ�367�ÿ�8ÿ�4ÿ�7�8ÿ68ÿ��4ÿ
)6��549ÿ68���685ÿÿ34648;�9ÿ�7��43�6�9ÿ8ÿ
�7���86��ÿ��6�6;4ÿ8ÿ43�6�4�ÿ&lt;�6ÿ4�;78ÿ�7ÿ
68���4ÿ��4ÿ����34ÿ�8ÿ�4ÿ� �ÿ8ÿ6�36��ÿ
4�36�;789ÿ(�6��ÿ(6��ÿ�37�64ÿ��4ÿ6 6ÿ�73ÿ��4ÿ
=78685ÿ&gt;�8�ÿ&lt;�4ÿ����34ÿ�8ÿ�4ÿ� �ÿ8ÿ:78685ÿ
��8ÿ�73� �6:4ÿ��8ÿ57�ÿ8ÿ76?4�;�4ÿ68�7ÿ����34ÿ
�8ÿ�4ÿ�7�6���ÿ&lt;�44ÿ�7�6�64ÿ(6��ÿ64ÿ�4ÿ68ÿ
� @685ÿ4�6678ÿ78ÿ:78685ÿ��854ÿ8ÿ84(ÿ
4�4�7��48��ÿAÿ��4ÿ)6��54ÿB7�8�6�ÿ8ÿ&gt;�88685ÿ
B7��6678ÿ4C�43648�4ÿ��387�43ÿ8ÿ��854ÿ68ÿ
�4 43�6�ÿ7�43ÿ;�49ÿ��4ÿD���34ÿE8ÿF4ÿG �ÿ8ÿ
=78685ÿ&gt;�8ÿ(6��ÿ�37�64ÿÿ�6�49ÿ�78;8�7�ÿ6 6ÿ
�73ÿ�8ÿ�4ÿ4�6678ÿ� @685ÿ��37�5�ÿ��854ÿ68ÿ
��4ÿ� @4��ÿ7�ÿ4�4��4ÿ8ÿ��768�4ÿ673 9ÿ
��4346�ÿ48�7�35685ÿ��4ÿ6���4�48�;78ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿ
�7855�43�ÿ57�ÿ8ÿ76?4�;�4ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿG �43ÿ&gt;�8�ÿÿ
H�ÿI&amp;�!%ÿ�01ÿJKL$'MN$%ÿ�37�64ÿ34�7��48 ;78ÿ
�73ÿ�;78ÿ8ÿ�7�6�64ÿ���ÿ(6��ÿ 34 ÿ��4ÿ6�4ÿ
8ÿ7��73��86;4ÿ648;O4ÿ68ÿ�34�67�ÿ��8ÿ
����43�ÿÿ
P�ÿ3!�0ÿQRS!$R$0��M&amp;0ÿ�37�64ÿ8ÿ7�43�64(ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿ
)6��544ÿ4�6678ÿ� @685ÿ�3����349ÿ�4 43�6�9ÿ8ÿ
7��43ÿ�78643;78ÿ���ÿ(6��ÿ��;� �4��ÿ36�4ÿ��4ÿ
6���4�48�;78ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿ��8�ÿ&gt;�6�6�ÿ�3;�6�;789ÿ
�6�6�ÿ48554�48�9ÿ�4 43�6�9ÿ8ÿ�3�843�6�ÿ
7��73��86;4ÿ(6��ÿ64ÿ6�� 4ÿ68ÿ��6ÿ����43�ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿÿ
ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿÿ

01ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

2345637ÿ945 ÿ57ÿ67�3ÿ

945 ÿ57ÿ3������ÿ73�34���36ÿ6�563��3ÿ6�56ÿ5�3ÿ�� �636ÿ5��� ÿ4��54ÿ�� 75��3ÿ5�3ÿ�����54ÿ���ÿ ��3 �ÿ�ÿ
6�75��ÿ3������ÿ6�57���54ÿ��4���54ÿ�� 75��3ÿ5�3ÿ���6544�ÿ����37�ÿ�75��ÿ���� ��5��ÿ63���4���3ÿ35�43ÿ
� �3 3ÿ6�ÿ��3�563ÿ�ÿ�5�ÿ���� ��3!ÿ"��#3�ÿ���� 63ÿ5��� ÿ� 4��43ÿ���� �6�ÿ�� 75��3!ÿ57ÿ� �3 3ÿ
7�5"ÿ6�3��ÿ� 6��3�ÿ�53ÿ����ÿ45��3ÿ�5�#36ÿ5�35ÿ6�56ÿ7�ÿ�6ÿ��44�"ÿ��4���54ÿ�� 75��3�ÿ$ ÿ6�3��ÿ�" �ÿ���� ��3ÿ
�5ÿ�5�34�ÿ�����73ÿ544ÿ��ÿ6�3ÿ�356�3ÿ3�3 5��ÿ6�ÿ ����6ÿ3"ÿ3������ÿ337�ÿ3�3��544�ÿ��ÿ�6ÿ�5ÿ5ÿ 7��3��%37ÿ
3������ÿ�53ÿ ��ÿ5ÿ6�����ÿ&amp;�35� �ÿ6�563��3ÿ���ÿ���"6�ÿ57ÿ3������ÿ73�34���36ÿ6�56ÿ5�3ÿ�� �636ÿ5��� ÿ
���3��36ÿ�� 75��3ÿ�5ÿ6� ÿ�34�ÿ���� ��3ÿ5'�5�6ÿ57ÿ ����6ÿ3"ÿ��36�36�ÿ�5��4�6563ÿ� �3 ÿ��3�5���ÿ
57ÿ��3563ÿ5ÿ���3ÿ����3���3ÿ�3���54ÿ3�����ÿ"�6�ÿ57�565�3�ÿ��ÿ�3���54ÿ5����5��ÿ6�ÿ�45 ��ÿ57ÿ3������ÿ
73�34���36ÿ54�ÿ544�" ÿ���� ��3ÿ6�ÿ33#ÿ� 7���ÿ�5�63�����ÿ57ÿ�6�3�ÿ�3���3ÿ���ÿ���43�365��ÿ��ÿ4��54ÿ
��54ÿ����ÿ�3���54�ÿ6563�ÿ��ÿ3������ÿ73�34���36ÿ�5�63��ÿ��3ÿ�45 ÿ57ÿ67�3ÿ�ÿ(33455ÿ&amp;� 6�ÿ57ÿ6�3ÿ
�3���ÿ6�56ÿ5�3ÿ�����656ÿ�ÿ�45 ��ÿ57ÿ3������ÿ73�34���36ÿ5�����3ÿ���ÿ6�3ÿ)�445�3ÿ��ÿ*����3ÿ��473�ÿ

(33455ÿ+33�54ÿ945ÿ

�3ÿ(33455ÿ&amp;� 6�ÿ+33�54ÿ945ÿ"5ÿ73�34��37ÿ"�6�ÿ�5�����5��ÿ����ÿ65#3��473�ÿ57ÿ �6ÿ��ÿ���3��36ÿ
6������6ÿ(33455ÿ&amp;� 6��ÿ57ÿ"5ÿ57��637ÿ�ÿ,-.,ÿ"�6�ÿ5ÿ�75637ÿ945ÿ3/�3�637ÿ�ÿ,-.0�ÿ16ÿ�����73ÿ��75�3ÿ6�ÿ
6�3ÿ&amp;� 6�ÿ57ÿ�6�3�ÿ65#3��473�ÿ6�56ÿ5�3ÿ"��#��ÿ6�ÿ577�3 ÿ� 3ÿ5�� 7ÿ457ÿ 3�ÿ�� ���ÿ5����46�3�ÿ3������ÿ
73�34���36�ÿ�3��35���ÿ57ÿ56�54ÿ�3���3�ÿ16ÿ�45��%3ÿ6�3ÿ��43ÿ��ÿ7�23�36ÿ�45�3�ÿ57ÿ�3����37ÿ��3ÿ
6�563��3ÿ���ÿ�����ÿ���"5�7ÿ�ÿ5ÿ"5�ÿ6�56ÿ�3�3�6ÿ4��54ÿ56����6�ÿ57ÿ����563ÿ����3�6�ÿ����6�ÿ"��43ÿ43�3�5���ÿ
�345�� ���ÿ57ÿ�����6 ��3ÿ���ÿ��445���5��ÿ�36"33ÿ���� ��3ÿ57ÿ3/�� �ÿ���5�35�� �ÿ256�3�ÿ6�5ÿ
�����7��ÿ��3������3ÿ�3����375�� ÿ���ÿ3"ÿ73�34���36ÿ57ÿ���"6��ÿ�6ÿ�ÿ�63737ÿ6�ÿ�3ÿ5ÿ����443�34�ÿ���574
�� �ÿ��73ÿ���ÿ577�3 ��ÿ6�3ÿ� 3�ÿ��5443�3�ÿ57ÿ�����6 ��3ÿ�5�37ÿ��ÿ6�3ÿ�5�ÿ���33 �ÿ5��7���� �ÿ
� �3 3�ÿ����%6�ÿ57ÿ�6�3�ÿ65#3��473�ÿ6������6ÿ(33455ÿ&amp;� 6��ÿ

6789:;&lt;7=ÿ?&lt;7ÿ@A7ÿ6ABA7:ÿÿ

��ÿ�3���54ÿ�45 ��ÿ�3���3ÿ���ÿ4��54ÿ���3��36ÿ57ÿ���� �6�ÿ���5�35�� ÿ"5ÿ73�34��37ÿ5ÿ�5�6ÿ��ÿ
D�����5�ÿ23���54ÿ9���3��6�ÿ1��5��3�ÿ"����ÿ3���5�3ÿ4��54ÿ����563�ÿ��4���ÿ57ÿ� 4���%6ÿ�5�63�ÿ6�ÿ�73���ÿ
�3���544�454��37ÿ���"6�ÿ57ÿ��36�36ÿ6�563��3�ÿ16ÿ��473ÿ�����5��ÿ57ÿ6��4ÿ6�56ÿ�5ÿ�34�ÿ65#3��473�ÿ
577�3 ÿ� 3ÿ57ÿ ��43�36ÿ6�3��ÿ4��54ÿ734��3�5���ÿ�45 ���ÿ57ÿ73����4�5#��ÿ����3 3�ÿ�3ÿ6789:;&lt;7=ÿ"5ÿ
73�34��37ÿ��ÿE36"��#ÿE��6�"36ÿ"�6�ÿ��6ÿ57ÿ�5�63����ÿ����ÿ5ÿ�5��36�ÿ��ÿ���� �6�ÿ65#3��473�ÿ57ÿ
�3��3�ÿ��ÿ6�3ÿ��4��ÿ6�����ÿ5ÿ�63 ��3�ÿ��4 ��3�ÿ�3���4"�73ÿ���� �6�ÿ�6�35��ÿ����3 �ÿ�3ÿ��54�ÿ6�563��3�ÿ
57ÿ5��� ÿ��4737ÿ�ÿ6�3ÿ6789:;&lt;7=ÿ"3�3ÿ��46ÿ��ÿ��4��ÿ��6ÿ�35�7ÿ6������6ÿ6�3ÿ����3 �ÿ5ÿ"344ÿ5ÿ�ÿ
3/�� �ÿ57ÿ57��637ÿ��54ÿ����ÿ4��54ÿ�45 ÿ57ÿ�45 ��ÿ���5��3�ÿÿ
ÿ

+�57ÿ)���ÿ

�3ÿ+�57ÿ)���ÿ�ÿÿ5ÿ����ÿ��ÿ�3���54ÿ���"6�ÿ��46ÿ�ÿ��6ÿ����ÿ��3�ÿ.F�---ÿ�3�736ÿ�ÿG 6����ÿH33�3�ÿ+�57ÿ
�5�3�3�ÿI54#5#5�ÿ(33455�ÿ57ÿJ3/���7ÿ�� �3�ÿ�3ÿ����3 �ÿ����43637ÿ�ÿ,--0�ÿ��4737ÿ�57��45��43�ÿ
��3�%�544�4�54�7ÿ ��3��ÿ��4��ÿ"��#����ÿK3�� 5��3�ÿ6�5L�ÿ��734���ÿ57ÿ7565ÿ554���ÿ16ÿ�3 4637ÿ�ÿ6�3ÿ
343���ÿ��ÿ5ÿM��3�3��37ÿ�35���Nÿ4ÿ6�56ÿ��ÿ5ÿ���"6�ÿ�35���ÿ6�56ÿ"�47ÿ�����63ÿ6�3ÿ�543ÿ6�56ÿ"3�3ÿ�73�%37ÿ��ÿ
6�3ÿ��4���ÿ�3ÿM��3�3��37ÿ�35����Nÿ5ÿ�73�%37ÿ��ÿ6�3ÿK3�� 5��3ÿÿ57ÿ63637ÿ��ÿ5ÿ�57��45��43ÿ ��3��ÿÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ PPÿ
00ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

4567899ÿÿ4�4�5ÿ��ÿ������ÿ������ÿ����ÿ�����ÿ�����ÿ��!���"ÿ#ÿ���ÿ����#$%ÿ�&amp;�%ÿ�#�ÿ'�����%(ÿ���ÿ���&amp;�#��ÿ
������ÿ#ÿ���ÿ!�#ÿ�&amp;�%ÿ��ÿ)��'��%�ÿ*�"ÿ�#�ÿ*������+ÿ,����ÿ�!��#�%ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ���#ÿ%����ÿ�����ÿ-�ÿ���%��'��+ÿ)�%ÿ
��'����!�#�ÿ��.��#ÿ�����ÿ��/���ÿ#'�%�!�#�%ÿ#ÿ����#��ÿ-�%ÿ%��'��(ÿ%�����0%(ÿ�#�ÿ-0�ÿ����%ÿ#ÿ'�����%ÿ�#�ÿ
�&amp;�%(ÿ���ÿ%�!�ÿ#'�%�!�#�%ÿ#ÿ#��ÿ��ÿ���#��ÿ������"%+ÿ
ÿ
2 758ÿ3�8545ÿ6�874�ÿ�7�8 9ÿ�46�59ÿ�8::�64ÿ��6ÿ47ÿ:6�669ÿ�6564�;ÿ&lt;�47ÿ45ÿ47ÿ=8�&gt;�5546ÿ59ÿ45ÿ47ÿ
��77�8?8:ÿ659�@?�@:7ÿ�86 5AÿB�@ ÿ749774974�ÿ�6�@ÿ47ÿ�4895ÿ:6�6��ÿ��6ÿ2 758ÿ3�8545ÿ6ÿ�ÿ��77�8�Cÿ
Dÿ 2 758ÿ3�8545ÿ6�4954�ÿ649ÿ4746ÿ=87445ÿ��ÿ74�ÿ74976ÿ475ÿ6�4954�ÿ��ÿ47ÿ694�5ÿ�ÿÿ87�7;ÿ59ÿ8 6ÿ
@�6ÿ:��4&gt; ÿ&lt;�84ÿ47ÿ=87445ÿ��ÿ74�ÿ45ÿ47ÿ�8486ÿ875ÿ6�@:69ÿ8447ÿ47ÿ694�5Aÿÿ
Dÿ 2 758ÿ3�8545ÿ6�4954�ÿ8 6ÿ@�6ÿ74F75ÿ4�ÿ� 7ÿ474ÿ47ÿ@��4ÿ4@:�6454ÿ=874&gt; �ÿ8 6ÿG7 459ÿ�6459�ÿ59ÿ
�@475ÿ5 6&lt;5;HÿGÿ�@475ÿ�645975ÿ546�5@ 54;Hÿ59ÿÿG�6546ÿ&lt; 845ÿ��ÿ47ÿ694�5ÿ59ÿ7 459ÿ66��ÿ4�ÿ
5486AHÿ
Dÿ J7ÿ@��4ÿ:�:876ÿ96�847ÿ�46494�ÿ45ÿ2 758ÿ3�8545ÿ8 6CÿÿGJ7ÿ9 7�:@ 54ÿ��ÿ@�6ÿK�69&lt;7ÿ7�8�459ÿ
�7�879ÿ&lt;ÿ56�8699ÿHÿLMNOPQÿ59ÿG@�6ÿ@4R9ÿ8�ÿ9 7�:@ 54ÿ�7�879ÿ&lt;ÿ56�8699HÿLSTOPUÿJ7ÿ7 �4ÿ
:�:876ÿ96�847ÿ�46494�ÿ8 6ÿ474ÿ@��4ÿ58ÿ7�8�459ÿ�7�879ÿ&lt;ÿ�:649ÿ�6�@ÿV�&lt;�ÿWÿR4�&gt;59ÿ6546�ÿXYZ[ÿ
94�96 \ÿ59ÿ@�6ÿ694�57ÿ�6 8 5�ÿ�7�879ÿ&lt;ÿ&lt;8474ÿX]^[ÿ94�96 \Aÿÿ
ÿ

2 758ÿ_545�87ÿ̀6�5�@46ÿa�859&gt;�5ÿÿ

J7ÿ2 758ÿ_545�87ÿ̀6�5�@46ÿa�859&gt;�5ÿ4�ÿÿ5�5?:6&gt;�5;ÿ�7�?�8599ÿ5�5?9� 65@ 54ÿ�6954b&gt;�5ÿ59ÿ
94��65ÿ&lt;�69ÿ87��ÿ:86:��ÿ4�ÿ4�ÿ�8::�64ÿ47ÿ2 758ÿ&lt;8�45��ÿ6�@@85445ÿ&lt;5ÿ:6�49459ÿ6��866�;ÿ
:6�96@@459;ÿ59ÿ6�77&lt;�6&gt; ÿ�::�64854&gt;�ÿ474ÿ8477ÿ�4659475ÿ47ÿ6�5�@46ÿ447445ÿ��ÿ2 758ÿ&lt;8�45���ÿ
59ÿ6�@@854&gt;�Aÿc5ÿZdeY;ÿ47ÿ2 758ÿ_545�87ÿ̀6�5�@46ÿa�859&gt;�5ÿX2_`a\ÿ6�598649ÿÿ�86 5ÿ8447ÿ&lt;8�45��ÿ
�856�ÿ45ÿ47ÿ3�8545ÿ�5ÿ� 67ÿ4��8�ÿ456789459ÿ4746ÿ:66:&gt;�5�ÿ��ÿ47ÿ9 549�ÿ��ÿ9�459ÿ&lt;8�45��ÿ45ÿ2 758ÿ
3�8545ÿ59ÿ47ÿ@��4ÿ664&gt;67ÿ&lt;6646�ÿ4�ÿ4746ÿ&lt;8�45��ÿ�866��ÿ59ÿ96�847Aÿÿ
ÿ

2 758ÿf�8�459ÿg6&gt;�5ÿ3�@@4h ÿ

J7ÿf�8�459ÿg6&gt;�5ÿ3�@@4h ÿXfg3\ÿ8 �ÿ::�4549ÿ&lt;5ÿ47ÿ2 758ÿ3�8545ÿ_755459ÿ3�@@4��4�5ÿ45ÿZdei;ÿ
��77�8459ÿ�8::�64ÿ&lt;5ÿ47ÿ3�8545ÿj�69ÿ��ÿ3�@@4��4�56�AÿÿJ7ÿ3�8545ÿj�69ÿ��ÿ3�@@4��4�56�ÿ::6� 9ÿÿ�4ÿ��ÿ
6&gt;�5�k9�7�ÿ��6ÿ47ÿfg3;ÿ87467ÿ779ÿ44�ÿl6�4ÿ@ &gt;59ÿ45ÿm 5ÿZdeiAÿÿJ7ÿfg3ÿ4�ÿ5999ÿ45ÿ:6�49459ÿ45��6@ &gt;�5ÿ
59ÿ�846 67ÿ4�ÿ7�67ÿ8544�ÿ��ÿ9� 65@ 54ÿ&lt;�84ÿ&lt;6�@459ÿG7�8�459ÿ6 95Hÿ6�@@854&gt;�Aÿ
ÿ

2 758ÿ3�8545ÿJ694ÿm 6F4ÿg575�4�ÿ

gÿ6�495&gt;7ÿ4694ÿ@ 6F4ÿ575�4�ÿ8 �ÿ6�598649ÿ&lt;5ÿ6 7ÿ�44ÿ6�5�87454�ÿ259n�nBgÿ45ÿZde^ÿ��6ÿo�6478 �4ÿ
m467495AÿJ7ÿ�4895ÿ575b�ÿ9@ 59ÿ�6�@ÿ 64�8�ÿ9@�96:746ÿ96�8:�ÿ��6ÿ@87&gt;?�@475ÿ7�8�459ÿ45:�ÿ�6�@ÿ
:�45&gt;7ÿG@� 6�Hÿÿ&lt;�47ÿ45�49ÿ59ÿ�84�49ÿ47ÿ�4895ÿ6 Aÿÿ
ÿ

2 758ÿ3�8545ÿf�8�459ÿc5 54�65ÿ

f�8�459ÿ6:�64�ÿ8 6ÿ:6:69ÿ&lt;5ÿo 48�6F�ÿo�6478 �4ÿ��6ÿg5464@;ÿj5b4;ÿp7F�F;ÿ2 758;ÿ59ÿq R��69ÿ
6�85&gt;�;ÿ4�ÿ:6�49ÿ47ÿ45��6@ &gt;�5ÿ��859&gt;�5ÿ��6ÿÿ694�57ÿ7�8�459ÿ�46495;ÿ5ÿ7@ 54ÿ��ÿ47ÿr��!����0ÿ���ÿ
s��ÿr�����+ÿJ7ÿ45 54�64�ÿ:6�49ÿ5ÿ� 648ÿ��ÿ7�8�459ÿK�69&lt;47445;ÿ45:;ÿ59ÿ6�594&gt;�5ÿ59ÿ45��6@ &gt;�5ÿ�5ÿ
6749ÿ�64�6�ÿ�867ÿ�ÿ5695ÿ59ÿ465�:�64&gt;�5ÿ6��4�;ÿ 6564�ÿ59ÿ��667��86�;ÿ59ÿ7�@ 7��5��Aÿÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ
ÿ
01ÿ
ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

N:O3965ÿPQÿ1R4ST8&lt;ÿN=8U4T=8SÿO8UÿN=896R9ÿ

345ÿ789 8ÿ589��ÿ4��9���ÿ
�488�95�ÿ��8ÿ9��7ÿ��5�9�5�ÿ87�ÿ
95�57���ÿ5�58��7ÿ
����97��5�ÿ8�8�8 5ÿ�7ÿ����5ÿ
85�ÿ5�57ÿ98�57ÿ��7���ÿ7�����7ÿ
�7ÿ�87�ÿ���� 7��5�ÿ��ÿ8ÿ� �4ÿ
8�5ÿ���5�ÿ�ÿ8ÿ��8�5ÿ945ÿ���5ÿ��ÿ
����5�ÿ945ÿ�5�57�5ÿ��ÿ945�5ÿ�87�ÿ
8��59�ÿ5�5�579�ÿ8ÿ�5894ÿ��ÿ
����97�9�ÿ�7ÿ95��ÿ��ÿ�58�7�ÿ
87�ÿ�8�798�7�7�ÿ8ÿ4��4ÿ!8�9�ÿ��ÿ
��5ÿ��ÿ�9�ÿ5���579�ÿ87�ÿ����9���ÿÿ
����5ÿ��ÿ7�9ÿ��94�9ÿ�4857�5��ÿ
345ÿ���� 7�9�#�ÿ��� 8��7ÿ��ÿ
5$�5�57��7�ÿ�4�%�ÿ�7ÿ95��ÿ��ÿ8��7�ÿ
87�ÿ�58��78�9��ÿ&amp;ÿ�5��75ÿ�7ÿ945ÿ
7� 5ÿ��ÿ��7�ÿ�5��5ÿ87�ÿ
�8���5��ÿ��� �75�ÿ��94ÿ87ÿ�7'$ÿ��ÿ
5�55��ÿ48�ÿ�5895�ÿ8ÿ��5�5�ÿ
��� 8��7ÿ9489ÿ�5�579�ÿ�4857�5�ÿ
��ÿ945ÿ��8ÿ������5�ÿ&amp;9ÿ945ÿ�8�5ÿ
��5�ÿ4��4ÿ58ÿ5�9895ÿ�8 5�ÿ�8�5ÿ�9ÿ
��(� 9ÿ9�ÿ8)8�9ÿ��7�ÿ�5��5ÿ
8��ÿ9�ÿ945ÿ���� 7�9��ÿ8�ÿ�87�ÿ
85ÿ���5�ÿ�9ÿ��ÿ945ÿ4���7�ÿ
�8�59ÿ�7ÿ����5ÿ87�ÿ*55878ÿ
+�79�ÿ8�ÿ8ÿ�4�5�ÿ, 9ÿ�5���95ÿ
945�5ÿ�4857�5�-87�ÿ�7ÿ���5ÿ
�8�5��ÿ5�8�5ÿ��ÿ945�-9455ÿ85ÿ
�87�ÿ����97��5�ÿ9�ÿ57487�5ÿ
����5#�ÿ!8�9�ÿ��ÿ��5ÿ87�ÿ���5ÿ
9��8��ÿ75�ÿ����97��5��ÿ
.7�58��7���ÿ945ÿ45894ÿ��ÿ8ÿ
���� 7�9�ÿ87�ÿ�9�ÿ��957�8ÿ��ÿ
75�ÿ�7�5�9�579ÿ��ÿ945ÿ����9ÿ��ÿ
�87�ÿ�8�9���ÿ��9ÿ8��7�ÿ945�ÿ��ÿ8ÿ
4��4ÿ!8�9�ÿ��ÿ��5/ÿ5�58��7ÿ
����97��5��ÿ� 9 8ÿ8�����5��ÿ
!8�9�ÿ789 8ÿ5�� �5��ÿ87�ÿ8ÿ

�5����7�ÿ����8ÿ57���7�579�ÿ
345�5ÿ55�579�ÿ���ÿ9�ÿ8)8�9ÿ75�ÿ
5���579�ÿ9489ÿ �7�ÿ��94ÿ945�ÿ
�����ÿ�7��5��5�ÿ ��7�ÿ���5�ÿ
87�ÿ�945ÿ8��59�ÿ9489ÿ�����5ÿ945ÿ
75�5��8�ÿ��7�8��7�ÿ��ÿ75�ÿ
5��7����ÿ�7�5�9�579�ÿÿ
&amp;�ÿ945ÿ0�8�5ÿ����ÿ9�ÿ�8�798�7ÿ
87�ÿ�����5ÿ945ÿ���� 7�9�#�ÿ
!8�9�ÿ��ÿ��5ÿ94��4ÿ�877�7�ÿ87�ÿ
�5�8�7�ÿ��ÿ�487�5�ÿ�9ÿ� �9ÿ
��7���5ÿ945ÿ0�8�5#�ÿ5$���7�ÿ
��795$9�ÿ34��ÿ�48�95ÿ��ÿ������ÿ
����5#�ÿ4��9���ÿ�5��8�4��ÿ
��795$9�ÿ���� 7�9�ÿ�488�95�ÿ
��� 8��7ÿ�488�95������ÿ87�ÿ
5��7����ÿ8��59��ÿÿ

123456ÿ48ÿ9:6ÿ;6&lt;4=8ÿ

����5#�ÿ5���78ÿ��795$9ÿ����ÿ945ÿ
��7�8��7�ÿ��ÿ945ÿ���� 7�9�#�ÿ
��� 8��7ÿ957���ÿ5�����579ÿ
����97��5��ÿ87�ÿ��5�9�5�ÿÿ
345ÿ7�94�5�957ÿ5���7ÿ��ÿ
?��4��87#�ÿ��5ÿ�57�7� 8ÿ��ÿ8ÿ
�8�5ÿ��ÿ�7�5��5ÿ789 8ÿ589��ÿ
95�57���ÿ789 8ÿ5�� �5ÿ
8��59��ÿ94���7�ÿ8��� 9 8ÿ
5��7���5��ÿ�58��78ÿ5�58��7ÿ87�ÿ
5��9��ÿ87�ÿ�58@�7�ÿ
���� 7��5��ÿ345ÿ87���8�5ÿ��ÿ
��5�9��ÿ8�5��ÿ��5��ÿ��48��ÿ87�ÿ
�8�87�ÿ��ÿ��)5�ÿ��94ÿ��8�5�ÿ87�ÿ
��8ÿ���5�ÿ9489ÿ85ÿ��7���58 5ÿ
���987�5�ÿ���ÿ8�5ÿ�59����987ÿ
���� 7��5��ÿ345�5ÿ���987�5�ÿ48�5ÿ
45�5�ÿ945�5ÿ��8ÿ���� 7��5�ÿ
�48�5ÿ945�ÿ�488�95ÿ87�ÿ�5895ÿ
�7�����8ÿ��57��5�ÿ9489ÿ48�5ÿ
01ÿ

VWXYZ[ÿ][^_`ÿabcdZe[fgÿchÿi`[ÿVWXYZ[ÿ
b`^Wj[ZÿchÿbcWW[Z_[kÿ

5���5ÿ�5@5���7��5�ÿ8�ÿ
5�5�579ÿ87�ÿ5��9ÿ���� 7��5�ÿ
8�ÿ�5ÿ8�ÿ�5��8 5ÿ�8�5�ÿ9�ÿ5���5�ÿ
34��ÿ7�!5ÿ 8ÿ�488�95ÿ87�ÿ
8��5��ÿ9�ÿ�895�ÿ��5�9�ÿ87�ÿ�945ÿ
789 8ÿ5�� �5�ÿ48�ÿ557ÿ945ÿ
5���7#�ÿ�5895�9ÿ5��7����ÿ���5�ÿ
?87�ÿ���� 7��5�ÿ48�ÿ945�ÿ
5��77�7��ÿ��94ÿ945ÿ� 5ÿ
�7��9�ÿ�ÿ�5�5�ÿ8�ÿ�8A�ÿ4 �ÿ��ÿ
�895@8�5�ÿ�ÿ8�@8�5�ÿ
987���98��7�ÿB7�5ÿ945ÿ87�ÿ�8�ÿ
�585��ÿ8��� 9 5ÿ5�8�5ÿ87ÿ
5��7����ÿ��7�8��7ÿ��ÿ���5ÿ
�89�ÿ��ÿ945ÿ5���7�ÿ
C89 8ÿ5�� �5�ÿ87�ÿ 8ÿ
�488�95ÿ48�5ÿ�8�5�ÿ�59ÿ87�945ÿ
�5ÿ��7�5ÿ945ÿDEFG#��ÿ?87�ÿ75�ÿ
5���579��ÿ�7� ��7�ÿ���7�H�879ÿ
8��79�ÿ��ÿ5�55�ÿ87�ÿ�58��78ÿ
5���579��ÿ48�5ÿ���5�ÿ9�ÿ945ÿ858ÿ
9�ÿ98�5ÿ8��8798�5ÿ��ÿ945ÿ5���7#�ÿ
��8ÿ9��7ÿ87�ÿ 8ÿ��5�9�5��ÿ
�9���ÿ5�58��7ÿ����97��5��ÿ
87�ÿ789 8ÿ589��ÿI�7�5ÿJKLM�ÿ945ÿ

�ÿ

efghijÿlmÿnopqjmÿrstoimjquÿtvÿmwjÿefghijÿ
swlfxjiÿtvÿstffjiyjzÿ

3456789ÿ7 ���78ÿ��ÿ84�3��ÿ
�7��4���37�ÿ�������ÿÿ�7ÿ������ÿ
68ÿ�!�!�ÿ"6��ÿ#44��8�ÿ$78��ÿ784ÿ
7�ÿ��4ÿ���4�ÿ537"685ÿ%78�4ÿ68ÿ
��4ÿ345678ÿ�8�ÿ��4ÿ���4&amp;ÿÿ
(7"4)43�ÿ� %�ÿ7�ÿ����ÿ537"��ÿ��ÿ
7%%334�ÿ7�6�4ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿ3456789ÿ
%6�4ÿ�8�ÿ)6���54&amp;ÿ*�4ÿ�4634ÿ�73ÿ
33��ÿ�6�4���4ÿ73ÿ�7�4ÿ78ÿ��3543ÿ
�7��ÿ%7��684�ÿ"6��ÿ�6�6�4�ÿ��8�ÿ
��ÿ�8�ÿ�65�43ÿ%7�ÿ68ÿ%6��ÿ�8�ÿ
)6���54ÿ�78��364�ÿ��ÿ�4�ÿ�7ÿ
534��43ÿ537"��ÿ�8�ÿ�4)4�7�48�ÿ68ÿ
33��ÿ�34��ÿ"�6�4ÿ��4ÿ7 ���78ÿ7�ÿ
7�4ÿ%7�� 86�4ÿ34��68ÿ��58�8�ÿ
73ÿ�4%�684�ÿ�4ÿ�7ÿ��%�73ÿ68%��685ÿ
54753��6%ÿ�34��ÿ�5685ÿ7 ���78�ÿ
�8�ÿ�7 ÿ7�ÿ68� �3�ÿ73ÿ4� �7��48�&amp;ÿÿ

+,-./01,2ÿ4ÿ
56,2,786ÿ92:860;,&lt;=ÿ

$��854ÿ68ÿ��4ÿ4%787��ÿ7)43ÿ��4ÿ
�4�3�ÿ%7��684�ÿ"6��ÿ%��854ÿ68ÿ
�4)4�7�48�ÿ�?438ÿ��375�7�ÿ
��4ÿ345678�ÿ��)4ÿ���ÿ�ÿ�3����%ÿ
6� �%�ÿ78ÿ��4ÿ7 ���78ÿ68ÿ�7��ÿ
@� 634ÿ�8�ÿ#44��8�ÿ$78��&amp;ÿÿ
A45688685ÿ68ÿ�!!��ÿ��4ÿB86�4�ÿC���4ÿ
4D43648%4�ÿ�ÿ34%4 678ÿ����ÿ���ÿ��3
E34�%�685ÿ�8�ÿ�785E���85ÿ4F4%�ÿ78ÿ
4� �7��48�ÿ�8�ÿ�7 685ÿ�4��8��
�3�%��3��ÿ68ÿG6%�65�8�ÿ"�6%�ÿ

4D43648%4�ÿ���4"6�4ÿ7 ���78ÿ
�7 �ÿ7�4ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿ�65�4�ÿ3��4ÿ7�ÿ
�734%�7 34ÿ68ÿ��4ÿ8��78�ÿ
436�48���ÿ�65�ÿ84� �7��48�ÿ
3��4�ÿ�8�ÿ�7�4ÿ���8�78�48�ÿ�8�ÿ
��65��ÿ��375�7�ÿ��4ÿ���4&amp;ÿH�6�4ÿ
��4ÿ�7�ÿ4)434ÿ37��4� ÿ"434ÿ
%78%48�3��4�ÿ68ÿ3��8ÿ�34��ÿ87ÿ
�3�ÿ7�ÿG6%�65�8ÿ"434ÿ6�� 84ÿ
�37�ÿ��4ÿ4F4%�ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿ34%4 678�ÿ
�8�ÿI73��"4�ÿG6%�65�8�ÿ68%��685ÿ
#44��8�ÿ$78���ÿ4D43648%4�ÿ
6586J%�8�ÿ%��854ÿ68ÿ6�ÿ7 ���78�ÿ
4� �7��48�ÿ��8��6%�ÿ�8�ÿ�7 685ÿ
��3K4�&amp;ÿA4�"448ÿ�!!!E�!�!�ÿ
#44��8�ÿ$78��9ÿ7 ���78ÿ534"ÿ
��ÿ�L�ÿ%7� �34�ÿ�7ÿ��Lÿ537"��ÿ
�4�"448ÿ���!E�!!!&amp;ÿM8�ÿ�4�"448ÿ
�!�!E�!���ÿ��4ÿ$78��9ÿ7 ���78ÿ
534"ÿ78��ÿ�L�ÿ��4ÿ�7"4�ÿ537"��ÿ
3��4ÿ68%4ÿ�4�734ÿ���!&amp;ÿ
I7�ÿ78��ÿ�6�ÿ537"��ÿ3��4ÿ�7"�ÿ��4ÿ
%��3�%�436�%ÿ7�ÿ����ÿ537"��ÿ
%��854�&amp;ÿH�6�4ÿ��8�ÿ346�48�ÿ7�ÿ
G6%�65�8ÿNÿ�8�ÿ#44��8�ÿ$78��ÿNÿ
�4Pÿ��4ÿ���4ÿ�73ÿ�4?43ÿ4� �7��48�ÿ
7 73�86�4�ÿ7��43ÿ����ÿ
%78�84�ÿ�7ÿ34�34ÿ�8�ÿ�7)4ÿ�7ÿ
#44��8�ÿ$78���ÿ�4��685ÿ�7ÿ�ÿ
K4"4�ÿ7 ���78ÿ%��854QÿH�6�4ÿ
��4ÿ8��43ÿ7�ÿ47�4ÿ�54�ÿ�!ÿ�4�3ÿ
�8�ÿ ÿ68%34�4��ÿ��434ÿ"�ÿ�ÿ
���8���ÿ�4%�684ÿ68ÿ68�6)6���ÿ
�54�ÿ��ERR�ÿ%�6��348�ÿ�8�ÿ���6�64ÿ68ÿ
#44��8�ÿ$78��&amp;ÿÿ
G�8�ÿ7�ÿ��44ÿ$78��E"6�4ÿ
7 ���78ÿ�348�ÿ��)4ÿ�785ÿ�448ÿ�ÿ
34��6��ÿ�73ÿ��4ÿS6���54ÿ7�ÿ@� 634�ÿ
"�6%�ÿ��ÿ4D43648%4�ÿ6586J%�8�ÿ
T%���78ÿ68ÿ6�ÿ7 ���78ÿ68%4ÿ
6�ÿ7 ���78ÿ�65�ÿ7�ÿ�378�ÿU!�ÿ
47�4ÿ�3685ÿH73��ÿH�3ÿV&amp;ÿH6��ÿ��4ÿ
�7 ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿS6���549ÿ�"�6��ÿ�8�ÿ��4ÿ
���43ÿ68� �3��ÿ��4ÿ7 ���78ÿ
01ÿ

�4%�684�ÿ�7ÿ�ÿ�7"ÿ7�ÿ���ÿ47�4ÿ68ÿ
�����ÿ�ÿ8��43ÿ����ÿ53������ÿ
68%34�4�ÿ8��ÿ���!�ÿ"�48ÿ@� 634ÿ
4D43648%4�ÿ�ÿ��354ÿ�7 ÿ7�ÿ
7 ���78ÿ�4�"448ÿ��!ÿ�8�ÿ���!�ÿ
"6��ÿ��4ÿ%��685ÿ�7"8ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿM63ÿ
W73%4ÿA�4�ÿ��4ÿ%7�� 86��9ÿ��354�ÿ
4� �7�43&amp;ÿM87��43ÿÿ�37ÿ7%%334�ÿ
�4�"448ÿ�!!!ÿ�8�ÿ�!�!ÿX44ÿ*���4ÿ
�Y&amp;ÿ*�4ÿ�!�!ÿ7 ���78ÿ"�ÿ
4����4�ÿ��ÿ���ÿÿ�ÿ�65��ÿ�4%�684ÿ7�ÿ
84�3��ÿ�Lÿ68%4ÿ�!!!&amp;ÿ*�4ÿ�!��ÿ
7 ���78ÿ4����4ÿ�73ÿ��4ÿS6���54ÿ
6ÿ��&amp;ÿ

|}~|ÿ

*�4ÿ537"��ÿ3��4ÿ68ÿ#44��8�ÿ
$78��ÿ84�3��ÿ�7��4�&amp;ÿ

 ÿ

37"��ÿ3��4ÿ68ÿ#44��8�ÿ$78��ÿÿ
�4�"448ÿ�!�!E�!��ÿ
Z)43����ÿ��4ÿS6���549ÿ7 ���78ÿ6[4ÿ
��ÿ�448ÿ��63��ÿ����4�ÿ34T4%�85ÿ
54843��ÿ7 ���78ÿ�348�ÿ68ÿ
I73��"4�ÿG6%�65�8ÿ)6���54�ÿ"�6%�ÿ
��6%����ÿ4D43648%4ÿ�7"43ÿ537"��ÿ
���8ÿ��8�ÿ7�ÿ��4ÿ3456789ÿ33��ÿ
�7"8�6 &amp;ÿ\4��ÿ��4ÿ%��3�%�436�%ÿ
7�ÿ��4ÿS6���549ÿ7 ���78ÿ��)4ÿ
%��854�ÿ7)43ÿ��4ÿ�4�3�ÿ"6��ÿ
34���4�ÿ6� �%�ÿ78ÿ��3K4�ÿ�4��8�ÿ
�8�ÿ43)6%4ÿ844�&amp;ÿ

],.=^_,/:ÿ̀8a^ÿ4ÿbc^ÿ

*�4ÿ�54ÿ7�ÿ�ÿ%7�� 86��9ÿ346�48�ÿ
��ÿ6586J%�8�ÿ6� �%�ÿ78ÿ�7 685ÿ
�4��8��ÿ43)6%4ÿ844��ÿ�8�ÿ
4� �7��48�ÿ��4dÿ"�6�4ÿ�7 4�7��ÿ
6[4ÿ%�8ÿ34T4%�ÿ%��854ÿ68ÿ
%7�� 86��ÿ�4�753��6%ÿ�8�ÿ658��ÿ
�ÿ844�ÿ�73ÿ���6�78��ÿ�7 685ÿ
7�78&amp;ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

fEg6hDiE4ÿ2XD4Y3KÿSTUV[]VSZÿ
j)�9�ÿ7kÿ

ÿÿ

Wÿ
Wÿ
C
X
D
4
Y
3
ÿ
C
X
D
STUVÿ STZV[ ST\Vÿ STU4VY[3ÿ STTVÿ
STUVÿ
ST\Vÿ
�8�� ÿ ^8_ÿ L`.abÿ c^&gt;ÿ L7&gt;.dbÿ c&gt;&gt;ÿ
' ��6�7ÿ 78�`a=ÿ 7d.dbÿ 7^�88aÿ =`.̀bÿ 7d�&gt;=aÿ
#76�$ÿ
e+ÿÿ
7&gt;`�cccÿ 7c._bÿ =8`�=`dÿ c7.&gt;bÿ =c8�_d=ÿ
�������6ÿ
"7��ÿ!"ÿ#6�7�ÿ�6�ÿ=87dÿ48 ���6ÿ# 8876��$ÿ"7%$ÿ

Wÿ
CXD4Y3ÿ ]VVVÿ
ST\V[
STTVÿ
=._bÿ ca`ÿ

Wÿ
CXD4Y3ÿ ]VSVÿ
STTV[
]VVVÿ
dbÿ cacÿ

Wÿ
CXD4Y3ÿ ]VSZÿ
]VVV[
]VSVÿ
L8.̀bÿ ca&gt;ÿ

Wÿ
CXD4Y3ÿ
]VSV[
]VSZÿ
8bÿ

------------------------7`bÿ =7�77_ÿ =a.̀bÿ =7�a8`ÿ =.̀bÿ =7�_`7ÿ 7.cbÿ

-■■■■■■-■
78._bÿ =`7�^d`ÿ =7._bÿ =_a�_7=ÿ &gt;.̀bÿ c8c�=&gt;^ÿ 7.̀bÿ

ÿ Q���ÿ"7��ÿ

4ÿ6789 ÿÿ �7��ÿ�6�ÿ����ÿ�7��ÿ� ÿ7��ÿ�ÿ�6 8ÿ��ÿ�6�6�ÿÿ��ÿ�8�� ÿ������ÿ���� ÿ���6�ÿ�6��7��6��ÿ
�ÿ !"ÿ#6�7�ÿ
�ÿ 48 ���6ÿ# 8876��$ÿ"7%$ÿ
�ÿ !"ÿ&amp;7 �7ÿÿ'�9 ÿ"��(�(��ÿ
�ÿ )�����ÿ��7���ÿ����*�ÿ�ÿ# 76�$ÿ ÿ����ÿ� ������ÿ
+�6ÿ %���6�ÿ�����ÿ��,�ÿ�8� ��6�ÿ�ÿ6�ÿ����ÿ��- 6�ÿ� �������ÿ����ÿ����( 6ÿ8 ��������ÿ�6�ÿ7����ÿ
(8 ��6�ÿ8 �6ÿ����ÿ�8���9�ÿ�6 8�( 6ÿ��6,�ÿ����$�ÿ�%����9�ÿ��ÿ��ÿ������ÿ�%�.ÿ46��ÿ���6��ÿ�6ÿ��ÿ#6�7�ÿ8 �6ÿ
����ÿ�8����6�ÿ9�� 6ÿ�7 6�ÿ�6�ÿ���� ��ÿ#6�7�ÿ��ÿ6�ÿ�%����9�.ÿÿ
ÿ)�ÿ��66���ÿ/0ÿ234565ÿ��ÿ�6�7���ÿ% $ÿ78ÿ$��ÿ�ÿ8 ��7 ÿ��7��( 6�ÿ���ÿ�6�ÿ�� ÿ9����ÿ�8 ������ÿ
�6 8�( 6ÿ ÿ���ÿ� ������ÿ�6ÿ��ÿ�76�$.ÿ9��� �����$�ÿ��ÿ#6�7�ÿ:�6�ÿ 8;ÿ���ÿ � ��ÿ8 ÿ������ÿ
�6 8�( 6ÿ6ÿ�6��%��7��ÿ�7����ÿ������ ��(���ÿ�6��7��6�ÿ�6�8 �ÿ8��$8 6��ÿ�% �$�ÿ�7��6�ÿ%��7�ÿ�887�ÿ
(8 �ÿ��.ÿ"�6�ÿ=88&gt;�ÿ����ÿ�6 8�( 6ÿ���ÿ�6����ÿ9 6ÿ������ÿ% $ÿ&gt;ÿ$��ÿ9$ÿ��ÿ?@3ABCD4ÿ2E@@64BFGÿ06AH3Gÿ
I?20JKÿ�ÿ����ÿ�6(677�ÿ�8 ������ÿ�7%$ÿ�6�7���ÿ9$ÿ��ÿ#6�7�ÿ&amp;7 �7ÿ����ÿ����ÿ%6�7���$ÿ� %��ÿ���7��ÿ�6�ÿ
7�L�L���ÿ� *��ÿÿ48 ���M�ÿ�8876�(�ÿ% $ÿ$�.ÿN7�( 66�� �ÿ� ÿ8����ÿ�ÿ�ÿ��8��ÿ ÿ��� ���ÿ�ÿ9���6ÿ
�6 8�( 6ÿ�97�ÿ�7�����ÿ�6�ÿ�7��6�ÿ76���.ÿ)�ÿ�7%$ÿ� �7��ÿ�(8���ÿ ÿ��7��( 6ÿ�6�ÿ�7��6�ÿ
������ ��(��ÿ����ÿ ÿ�8���ÿ� ���ÿ�6��7��6�ÿ�����ÿ�6�ÿ��7��( 6ÿ�79� 7��.ÿN7�( 6�ÿ��O�ÿ� ÿ��8���ÿ�ÿ���ÿ6ÿ
��ÿ��66���ÿ�6�7�ÿ�6�ÿ 8.ÿÿ��(8���ÿ ÿ�8���ÿ� ������ÿ� ��ÿ� ÿ9���ÿ6ÿ����ÿ������ÿ% ÿ�ÿ&gt;L$�ÿ(8 ÿ
� ���ÿ�6�ÿ � �6�ÿ��ÿ�% ��ÿ������ ��(��ÿ% ÿ����ÿ(8 ÿ� ��.ÿP ÿ�8���ÿ� �������ÿ��ÿ8���6ÿÿ ÿ��ÿ
����.ÿ' ��6�7ÿ#76�$ÿ����ÿ��ÿ7��ÿ�6ÿ����ÿÿ�8�� ÿ����ÿ ÿ�8 ÿ������ÿ�6 8�( 6.ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ 7&gt;ÿ
ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

3456447ÿ9 9 �ÿ5�4ÿ������4ÿ���5ÿ
��������7ÿ�7ÿ74����ÿ���ÿ��4ÿ������ÿ
�7�4�ÿ5�4ÿ��4ÿ��ÿ���ÿ6���4ÿ
�4��475��4�ÿ��ÿ5���4ÿ��4ÿ� !ÿ
��46ÿ��"�5�7�����#ÿÿ$7ÿ9 �ÿ
%&amp;���4'�ÿ��������7ÿ6��ÿ���7�4�ÿ
5��7ÿ5�4ÿ(��75�'�)ÿ5��5ÿ5�47�ÿ���ÿ
��7�4ÿ�4*4��4��ÿ6�5�ÿ5�4ÿ������4'�ÿ
��������7ÿ7�6ÿ���4�ÿ5��7ÿ5�4ÿ
(��75�ÿ��ÿ�ÿ6���4#ÿÿ$7ÿ9 �ÿ5�4ÿ
��������7ÿ��ÿ5�4ÿ������4ÿ��ÿ%&amp;���4ÿ
��������7ÿ�*4�ÿ��4ÿ�ÿ6��ÿ+#,-�ÿ
��&amp;���4�ÿ5�ÿ5�4ÿ(��75�ÿ
�4��475��4ÿ��ÿ9,-#ÿ.7��ÿ�7ÿ9 �ÿ
5�4ÿ&amp;4���7ÿ��4ÿ�7ÿ5�4ÿ������4ÿ��ÿ
%&amp;���4ÿ6��ÿ�/#ÿ�4����ÿ6���4ÿ5�4ÿ
&amp;4���7ÿ��4ÿ(��75�6��4ÿ6��ÿ #,ÿ
�4���#ÿ$7ÿ9 �ÿ%&amp;���4'�ÿ&amp;4���7ÿ��4ÿ
0+#ÿ�4���1ÿ��ÿ�"�*4ÿ5��5ÿ��ÿ5�4ÿ
(��75�ÿ09#�1#ÿ24���475�ÿ��ÿ"�5�ÿ5�4ÿ
������4ÿ�7�ÿ5�4ÿ(��75�ÿ��ÿ�ÿ6���4ÿ
��4ÿ���7�3��75��ÿ���4�ÿ5��7ÿ
�4���475�ÿ�5�546��44ÿ5�4ÿ&amp;4���7ÿ
��4ÿ���ÿ5������7ÿ��ÿ6/#6ÿ�4���#ÿ7�4ÿ
&amp;4���7ÿ��4ÿ�7�ÿ��������7ÿ��ÿ5�4ÿ
��������7ÿ�*4�ÿ��4ÿ�ÿ��ÿ���84�54�ÿ
5�ÿ��7�7�4ÿ5�ÿ�7��4��4ÿ�5ÿ�ÿ����4�ÿ
��54ÿ5��7ÿ5�4ÿ95�54#ÿÿ
.�ÿ5�4ÿ��������7ÿ��4��ÿ5�4ÿ7�&amp;"4�ÿ
��ÿ�74ÿ�7�ÿ56��4���7ÿ����4�����ÿ
�7��4��4�ÿÿ�ÿ5�47�ÿ�4:4�54�ÿ�7ÿ�ÿ
�4���7�7�ÿ�*4���4ÿ����4����ÿ��;4#ÿ
&lt;464�ÿ��������4�ÿ������47ÿ�7�ÿ
��&amp;���ÿ����4�����ÿ�4��4�475ÿ
���6�7�ÿ7�&amp;"4��ÿ��ÿ=4&amp;�5�ÿ
74�54��&gt;ÿ�7�ÿ��75��"�54ÿ5�ÿ5�4ÿ
������4'�ÿ����7@�7�ÿ����4����ÿ
��;4#ÿÿÿ.5ÿ#+ÿ�4���4ÿ�4�ÿ����4����ÿ
0BBC1�ÿ%&amp;���4'�ÿ�*4���4ÿ����4����ÿ
��;4ÿ��ÿ64��ÿ"4��6ÿ5��5ÿ��ÿ"�5�ÿ5�4ÿ
.*4���4ÿ����4����ÿ��;4ÿ��ÿ5�4ÿ�5�54ÿ
09# ÿBBC1ÿ�7�ÿ(��75�ÿ0"�5�ÿ9#6,ÿ
BBC1#ÿÿ

9�&amp;4ÿ��ÿ5�4�4ÿ���7�4�ÿ�4:4�5ÿ
7�5����ÿ��4ÿ�7��4��4��ÿ��ÿ5�4ÿ3�"�ÿ
3��&amp;4��ÿ"4��7ÿ5�ÿ�4���ÿ�4��4&amp;475ÿ
��4)ÿ6���4ÿ��&amp;4ÿ���65�ÿ��7ÿ"4ÿ
�����754�ÿ���ÿ"�ÿ746ÿ�4���475�ÿ5��5ÿ
&amp;�*4�ÿ5�ÿ5�4ÿ��4�ÿ�����6�7�ÿ
�4��4&amp;475#ÿ7�4�4ÿ5�47��ÿ��*4ÿ
5�4&amp;47����ÿ�&amp;���5�ÿ�7ÿ5�4ÿ
(��75�'�ÿ6��@����4�ÿ��������ÿ�7�ÿ
�4�*��4ÿ�7�ÿ&amp;��@45ÿ�4&amp;�7��#ÿ

EFGHIJGKÿMINOKGPIJÿ

.�ÿ�ÿ��&amp;&amp;�7�5�ÿ�4754�4�ÿ����7�ÿ�5�ÿ
��5����ÿ�4��4���7ÿ�����5�7��4��ÿ
%&amp;���4'�ÿ4��7�&amp;�ÿ�7�ÿ��������7ÿ
��4ÿ������ÿ�4���7���ÿ6�5�ÿ�7ÿ�7:�Qÿ
��ÿ*���5���ÿ�7�ÿ�4���7��ÿ�4���475��ÿ
�7�ÿ����&amp;��7��7�ÿ4��7�&amp;��ÿ
���*�5��ÿ�������7�ÿ�7ÿ5�4ÿ��&amp;&amp;4�ÿ
&amp;�75��#ÿÿ
94���7��ÿ��������7ÿ:��5����7�ÿ
��47'5ÿ&amp;4����4�ÿ"�ÿ5�4ÿ(47���ÿ��ÿ
.&amp;4����7ÿ(�&amp;&amp;�7�5�ÿ9��*4�ÿ0.(91�ÿ
"�5ÿ5�4ÿ.(9ÿ��4�ÿ���75ÿ*���75ÿ
�����7�ÿ�7�5�ÿ5��5ÿ��4ÿ���ÿ
=�4���7��&gt;ÿ��4#ÿ$7ÿR44��7��ÿ(��75��ÿ
6�-ÿ0� 6ÿ�����7�ÿ�7�5�1ÿ��ÿ
R44��7��ÿ(��75�'�ÿ5�5��ÿ�����7�ÿ
�5��@�ÿ�7�ÿ6-ÿ06ÿ�7�5�1ÿ��ÿ
%&amp;���4'��ÿ��ÿ������34�ÿ��ÿ�4���7��S
��&amp;���4�ÿ5�ÿ-ÿ��ÿ5�4ÿ95�54'�ÿ5�5��ÿ
�����7�ÿ�5��@#ÿ7�4ÿ7�&amp;"4�ÿ��ÿ
�����7�ÿ�7�5�ÿ������34�ÿ��ÿ
=�4���7��&gt;ÿ�7��4��4�ÿ"�ÿ -ÿ
"456447ÿ9 9 �ÿ��&amp;���4�ÿ5�ÿ
�7��ÿ-ÿ5�5��ÿ�����7�ÿ�7�5ÿ���65�S
��@4��ÿ�4:4��7�ÿ�ÿ5�47�ÿ��ÿ
��7*4����7ÿ���&amp;ÿ�4�����7�ÿ��&amp;4�ÿ
5�ÿ�4���7��ÿ�����7�#ÿÿ
.�����7��ÿ��5�ÿ��ÿ�*����"�4ÿ���&amp;ÿ5�4ÿ
TUVWXYZ[Wÿ]^_X^`abÿcZa[Ubadÿ
eUfgdahUbÿcWgijÿ09 �1�ÿ6����ÿ
���6�ÿ���7�4�ÿ�7ÿ��������7ÿ"�ÿ
01ÿ

&amp;�75�ÿ�7ÿ4���ÿ���75�ÿ�7ÿk��5�64�5ÿ
5������7#ÿR44��7��ÿ(��75�'�ÿ
��������7ÿ��ÿ4��&amp;�54�ÿ5�ÿ�7��4��4ÿ
"�ÿ�-ÿ�7ÿ5�4ÿ��&amp;&amp;4�ÿ&amp;�75��ÿ5�ÿ
�*4�ÿ6� ÿ�4���475�#ÿ7���ÿ�7����4�ÿ
�4���7��ÿ�4���475��ÿ�*4�7���5ÿ
*���5����ÿ�7�ÿ�5�4�ÿ5��7��475ÿ
�4���475�ÿ5��5ÿ��4ÿ�5���7�ÿ�7ÿ�4��7�ÿ
��&amp;4��ÿ��&amp;�����7���ÿ2�ÿ���@��ÿ
��54���ÿ&amp;�54���ÿ"4�ÿ�7�ÿ"�4�@���5��ÿ
��l��4��ÿ�7�ÿ&amp;���7��ÿ0k��5�64�5ÿ
5������7ÿ94���7��ÿB�������7ÿ
.7�������ÿ9 ��ÿ59mÿR�7�ÿB�����ÿ
$7��5�541#ÿ$5ÿ��ÿ�&amp;���5�75ÿ5�ÿ7�54ÿ
5��5ÿ���5���ÿ*���5����ÿ�����75ÿ���ÿ�ÿ
���7�3��75ÿ�&amp;��75ÿ��ÿ%&amp;���4'�ÿ
5��n�ÿ�7�ÿ*���5���7#ÿ7�4ÿk���7��ÿ
B��@ÿ94�*��4ÿ4��&amp;�54�ÿ5��5ÿÿ�*4�ÿ
#+ÿ&amp;�����7ÿ�4���4ÿ*���5ÿ9�44��7�ÿ
34��ÿo�74�ÿ�77������ÿ6�5�ÿ+9-ÿ��ÿ
*���5�ÿ�������7�ÿ"456447ÿp�74ÿ�7�ÿ
.����5#ÿ5�7�ÿ��ÿ5���4ÿ5����ÿ
�����7�54ÿ��ÿ47�ÿ�7ÿ5�4ÿ������4ÿ��ÿ
%&amp;���4�ÿ�����7�7�ÿ���ÿ�7ÿ
47��&amp;���ÿ��������7ÿ�7�ÿ5��n�ÿ
���@4ÿ�7ÿ5�4ÿ��&amp;&amp;4�ÿ&amp;�75��#ÿ

qIOHrJsÿÿ

R�@4ÿ�5�4�ÿk��5�64�5ÿ5������7ÿ
��&amp;&amp;�7��4��ÿ%&amp;���4ÿ��ÿ
4Q�4��47��7�ÿ���7�4�ÿ�7ÿ�����7�ÿ
�4&amp;�7�ÿ�7�ÿ����5��4�ÿ��ÿ�ÿ��7�4ÿ��ÿ
�����7�ÿ�����4�ÿ5��5ÿ��4ÿ�&amp;����7�ÿ
"���74��4��ÿ��������ÿ�7�ÿ��&amp;&amp;�7�5�ÿ
*�5���5�#ÿC����7�ÿ����5��4�ÿ��4ÿ
�&amp;����7�ÿ����4�����ÿ���&amp;ÿ������ÿ
5�4ÿ�7��&amp;4ÿ��4�5��&amp;#ÿ0944ÿ7���45ÿ
5��@45ÿ.7�������ÿR44��7��ÿ(��75��ÿ
5������7�ÿ7�4ÿ5��@45ÿ95��54��ÿ
tk�*4&amp;"4�ÿ6�ÿ9 �uÿ�l��4vv
666#7456��@�7��5�64�5#���v
��4�3�4�v3�4&amp;�7��4�v6,v1ÿÿ
.ÿ7�&amp;"4�ÿ��ÿ�4�475ÿ�����7�ÿ�5���4�ÿ

�ÿ

3456789ÿ �ÿ�4���8�ÿ�8ÿ����ÿ
��������ÿ���!"ÿ# �$%�&amp;ÿ'�(��!)"ÿ
�4*83ÿ��9+5�9ÿ�,4�3�-./ÿ
��0�ÿ14�ÿ46�84.3�ÿ �46�46ÿ
288.�9�6ÿ3469/4ÿ��ÿ*8..ÿ��ÿ��68�ÿ
�8.�83ÿ4ÿ46�9�ÿ56�./ÿ4�ÿ
5493649�ÿ79./ÿ�-46ÿ89ÿ41ÿ�89�.�ÿ
�93ÿ:9ÿ41ÿ4*98�;4556083ÿ478�ÿ
*8�8ÿ549�38�83ÿ&lt;�,4�3�-.8=ÿ4ÿ
46�84.3�ÿ8��99�ÿ6938�ÿ?@A4AAAÿ
08�ÿ/8���ÿ�8ÿBACDÿE78�5�9ÿ
347769 /ÿF6�G8/ÿ�804��ÿ 8ÿ
783�9ÿ478ÿG�.68ÿ41ÿ4*98�;
4556083ÿ478�ÿ9ÿ 8ÿH..��8ÿ�ÿ
?C8@4CAA�ÿI838��.ÿ74����8ÿ
�638.98�ÿ���678ÿ:A9ÿ41ÿ 8ÿ
46�84.3ÿ95478ÿ*..ÿ-8ÿ�089ÿ49ÿ
46�9��ÿÿ
EÿBACKÿ&lt;���8ÿ7��L8ÿ�9�./��=ÿ
���8��83ÿ 8ÿ04896�.ÿ�996�.ÿ
387�93ÿ14�ÿ98*ÿ46�9�ÿ69 �ÿ9ÿ
288.�9�6ÿ3469/�ÿMÿ�4*83ÿ �ÿ
8�8ÿ7�/ÿ-8ÿ�ÿ7��L8ÿ14�ÿKDÿ98*ÿ
4*98�;4556083ÿ46�9�ÿ69 �4ÿ�93ÿ
NNÿ�89�.ÿ69 �4ÿ9ÿ288.�9�6ÿ3469/ÿ
8�5ÿ/8��ÿ �46�ÿBAC84ÿ14�ÿ
46�84.3�ÿ8��99�ÿ-8*889ÿ
?C84AAAÿ�93ÿ?8B4AAAÿ08�ÿ/8���ÿM9ÿ
O70�84ÿ 8�8P�ÿ�ÿ04896�.ÿ387�93ÿ
14�ÿDÿ98*ÿ4*98�;4556083ÿ69 �ÿ�93ÿ
CAÿ98*ÿ�89�.ÿ69 �ÿ8�5ÿ/8��ÿ14�ÿ
4�8ÿ46�84.3��ÿ
E554�39�ÿ4ÿBACQÿF�8ÿO56�.R83ÿ
H�.68ÿSFOHTÿ3��4ÿ6938G8.4083ÿ
�8�3896�.ÿ.4�4ÿ74�./ÿ.45�83ÿ9ÿ
8ÿ�8589./ÿ-6.ÿ�6-3G�49�4ÿ
��9�8ÿ�9/* 8�8ÿ1�47ÿ?CA4AAAÿ4ÿ
?:@4AAAÿFOH4ÿ* ÿ�8�ÿG�.68�U
�-4G8ÿVWXXYXXXU14�ÿ8Z�69�ÿ
46�8�ÿ.45�83ÿ9ÿ 8�8ÿ
�6-3G�49��ÿÿ�8ÿ783�9ÿG�.68ÿ14�ÿ
�..ÿ�Z�-.8ÿ0�408�/ÿ* 9ÿ 8ÿ
H..��8ÿ�ÿ�00�4Z7�8./ÿ?DN4C@A�ÿ

74�8ÿ4ÿ*4�LÿSBACDÿE78�5�9ÿ
347769 /ÿF6�G8/T�ÿt !�uÿv�!�ÿ
)�w�xy�&amp;ÿxzz�y�&amp;ÿ{�$y��y �$ÿ
�)�ÿ�!ÿ�(�%��|��ÿ�!ÿ!}�ÿ(%���&amp;�ÿ��(��~ÿ
r ÿ.���8ÿ08�589��8�ÿ41ÿ*4�L8��ÿ
5477669�ÿ4ÿ*4�L4ÿ��9�04��649ÿ
54��U 95.639�ÿG8 5.8ÿ4*98�� 0ÿ
¡¢£¤¥ÿ§¨©ÿ§¨¢ª«¬­®«­­¯ÿ°­±²¢³ªÿ
54��4ÿ168.4ÿ9�6��9584ÿ�93ÿ
989�958U7�L8ÿ60ÿ�ÿ.���8ÿ
[46�9�ÿ�,4�3�-./ÿ��68�ÿ��8ÿ 7�
�404�649ÿ41ÿ�9ÿ�G8���8ÿ46�84.3ÿ
5470469383ÿ-/ÿ��9�04��649ÿ 0
63�84ÿ 8ÿ/05�.ÿ46�84.3ÿ9ÿ
54��4ÿ��ÿ7�9/ÿ�8�389�ÿ547768ÿ 469/ÿ�0893�ÿ�-46ÿ:K9ÿ
46�38ÿ 8ÿH..��8ÿ4�ÿ3469/ÿ4ÿ 2481ÿ8.��ÿ99�564ÿ378
*4�L4ÿ�404ÿ�858G8ÿ�8�G58�ÿ4�ÿ14�ÿ 54��ÿ�.498�ÿÿÿ49ÿ��9�04��649ÿ
�544.�ÿ\�649�.ÿ3��ÿ935�8�ÿ �ÿ
46�84.3�ÿ�46.39Pÿ�0893ÿ74�8ÿ
�9ÿK@9ÿ41ÿ 8�ÿ95478ÿ49ÿ 8ÿ
547-983ÿ54��ÿ41ÿ46�9�ÿ�93ÿ
��9�04��649�ÿ]6ÿ�ÿ/05�.ÿ
46�84.3ÿ9ÿ288.�9�6ÿ3469/ÿ
EÿBACQÿ9 83ÿr�/ÿ�804�ÿ3896+8�ÿ
�0893�ÿ@N9ÿ41ÿ�ÿ4�.ÿ95478ÿ49ÿ 8ÿ54�ÿ41ÿ-��5ÿ9883�ÿ14�ÿ8�5ÿ
8ÿ547-983ÿ54��ÿ41ÿ46�9�ÿ�93ÿ 5469/ÿ9ÿ 5 ��94ÿ�93ÿ 8ÿ967-8�ÿ
��9�04��6494ÿ* .8ÿ7438��8ÿ 41ÿ46�84.3�ÿ �ÿ��8ÿ* �ÿ9 83ÿ
95478ÿ46�84.3�ÿ�0893ÿQ:9ÿ41ÿ r�/ÿ5�..�ÿE2M3Oÿoÿ�9ÿ�5�49/7ÿ14�ÿ
8�ÿ95478ÿ49ÿ 4�8ÿ*4ÿ54��ÿ E��8ÿ27 834ÿM95478ÿ349���9834ÿ
�.498ÿ�ÿ
O70.4/83�ÿE2M3Oÿ46�84.3�ÿ�G8ÿ
95478�ÿ�-4G8ÿ 8ÿ1838��.ÿ04G8�/ÿ
.8G8.4ÿ-6ÿ�6..ÿ��6��.8ÿ4ÿ�,4�3ÿ
-��5ÿ46�84.3ÿ9858��68��ÿÿM9ÿ
288.�9�6ÿ3469/4ÿ�-46ÿN9ÿ41ÿ
46�84.3�ÿ��8ÿ8�67�83ÿ4ÿ.G8ÿ9ÿ
In/ÿ08�589ÿS@A9Tÿ41ÿ288.�9�6ÿ
G8�/4ÿ�93ÿ�94 8�ÿBA9ÿ41ÿ
3469/P�ÿ*4�L14�58ÿS@4C8Aÿ*4�L8��Tÿ 04
8ÿ549�38�83ÿ4ÿ-8ÿ
*4�Lÿ46�38ÿ41ÿ 8ÿ3469/4ÿ* .8ÿ E42M63�O8�ÿr4.3�ÿÿ���ÿ78
K4BCDÿ*4�L8��ÿÿ;ÿDA9ÿ41ÿ 8ÿ0840.8ÿ 95478ÿ41ÿ?@D4CN384�ÿ�99ÿ34ÿ64�68�84.34ÿ.3ÿ
870.4/83ÿ9ÿ 8ÿ3469/ÿoÿ547768ÿ &lt;�6�GG�.=ÿ-63�8�ÿ��9�9�ÿ1�47ÿ
94ÿ 8ÿ3469/ÿ14�ÿ*4�L�ÿ�8ÿ
�-46ÿ?C84AAAÿ08�ÿ/8��ÿ4ÿ?@N4AAAÿ
0�7��/ÿ38�69�649�ÿ14�ÿ 4�8ÿ
8�ÿ/8��4ÿ7�9/ÿ46�84.3�ÿ9ÿ
5477669�ÿ46�38ÿ41ÿ288.�9�6ÿ 0
88.�9�6ÿ3469/ÿ��8ÿ5.8��./ÿ
3469/ÿ��8ÿp��93ÿ���G8��84ÿ]89R84ÿ 2
��6��.9�ÿ4ÿ7�L8ÿ893�ÿ788�ÿÿ
q�.L��L�4ÿE9�74ÿ�93ÿr8Z14�3ÿ
546968��ÿÿ�8ÿ783�9ÿ547768ÿ ÿ
678ÿ41ÿ 8ÿH..��8P�ÿ*4�L14�58ÿ�ÿC8ÿ
7968�sÿBD9ÿ41ÿ*4�L8��ÿ9ÿ 8ÿ
H..��8ÿ5477669�ÿ:Aÿ7968�ÿ4�ÿ
ÿÿÿÿÿÿ

adjlÿdl_eÿhÿ
iÿdkbldbÿ

^_`abcd_e`fdaÿhÿ
idjjkelbÿ

ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ�$%ÿYZ-/&amp;Z[(6'71ÿ2333;2389ÿÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

*,[0%ÿ2.ÿ

ÿÿ
�$%ÿ
�&amp;'()ÿ
*+%,&amp;-.ÿ
3;&lt;ÿ
G;8Hÿ
8K;2&lt;ÿÿ
2G;&lt;&lt;ÿ

�������ÿ��ÿ������ÿÿ

'5ÿ '/,01ÿ 4ÿ'5ÿ '/,01ÿ 4ÿ'5ÿ �:,4ÿ
7$%1ÿ
'/,01ÿ �')4ÿ
2333ÿ 2(30,363ÿ'71 2383ÿ �')2(30,863ÿ'71ÿ 2389ÿ �')2(30,869ÿ'71ÿ 2383;
2389ÿ
=ÿ
&gt;?ÿ @=ÿ A?ÿ
Bÿ
Bÿ
Cÿ
A@ÿ @D?ÿ I&gt;ÿ J?ÿ I&gt;ÿ J?ÿ
Bÿ
&gt;Dÿ F?ÿ
=ÿ
&gt;?ÿ &gt;Jÿ =?ÿ
&gt;FB?ÿ
EIÿ @J?ÿ FIÿ @E?ÿ IJÿ @@?ÿ CI=?ÿ

��������ÿ���� !ÿÿÿ ���#����ÿ
ÿ
233
2333ÿ 2383ÿ 2389ÿ 3ÿ 2383ÿ 2389ÿ
A?ÿ
@J?ÿ
F?ÿ
&gt;D?ÿ

D?ÿ
@A?ÿ
F?ÿ
@E?ÿ

D?ÿ E?ÿ
@I?ÿ @J?ÿ
E?ÿ Jÿ
@E?ÿ IB?ÿ

F?ÿ
@=?ÿ
@B?ÿ
&gt;A?ÿ

F?ÿ
@E?ÿ
@B?ÿ
&gt;D?ÿ

&lt;G;9&lt;ÿ @IIÿ

IA?ÿ

@DIÿ

I=?ÿ

@ABÿ

D@?ÿ

A?ÿ &gt;=?ÿ ID?ÿ I&gt;?ÿ &gt;&gt;?ÿ &gt;=?ÿ &gt;=?ÿ

9GLÿ =Jÿ
'/,0ÿ IE=ÿ

&gt;D?ÿ
ÿ

@@@ÿ
IEAÿ

IB?ÿ
ÿ

@@Iÿ
ÿ

I@?ÿ
IF?ÿ

@?ÿ @E?ÿ &gt;I?ÿ &gt;=?ÿ @&gt;?ÿ @D?ÿ @A?ÿ
ÿ
ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ ÿ

3456789ÿMNOPÿQR86S7Tÿ4RR5SUVÿ356W8Vÿ8�XRTU8�ÿ

#'(-Z7$ÿ�7Z/-ÿzÿ\%,-'7,0ÿ#'(-Z7$1ÿ2383;2389ÿÿ
*,[0%ÿ{.ÿ

ÿÿ

^_`àbcÿefÿghi_jcÿ

� ��ÿ � ��ÿ
]ÿ\��\����ÿ ]ÿ\��\����ÿ 4ÿ\��\����ÿ 4ÿ������\�ÿ��ÿ 4ÿ������\�ÿ��ÿ
#��\���ÿ #��\���ÿ #��\���ÿ #��\���ÿ #��\���ÿ���\1ÿ � ��ÿ#��\���ÿ \��\����ÿ#��\���ÿ
���\1ÿ ���\1ÿ2389ÿ ���\1ÿ2383ÿ ���\1ÿ2389ÿ 2389ÿ
���\1ÿ2383; ���\1ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ2383;
2383ÿ
2389ÿ
2389ÿ
IDEÿ

IFBÿ

@@Iÿ

@I@ÿ

IFkI?ÿ

DkF?ÿ

@AkJ?ÿ

�ÿ_
345_
6j
7c
89ÿ
ÿl3eÿmn
8�o
5p
ghi
iÿ @qB==ÿ

@q@&gt;&gt;ÿ

DD&gt;ÿ

D&gt;Iÿ

I=k=?ÿ

Ik@?ÿ

CDkI?ÿ

rccànasÿtesnuvÿ @DqJIAÿ

@Aq&gt;@Dÿ

DqF=@ÿ

Aq@BIÿ

IIkA?ÿ

@kJ?ÿ

J?ÿ

&gt;=Fqÿ&gt;DJÿ

FkI?ÿ

kI?ÿ

=k=?ÿ

wuaucÿefÿx_yp_banÿ DqAI&gt;q&gt;IIÿ DqADDqJ&gt;Bÿ &gt;FIqBE@ÿ
3456789ÿMNOPÿQR86S7Tÿ4RR5SUVÿ356W8Vÿ8�XRTU8�ÿ

ÿ01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

345678ÿ ����64ÿ
�����8ÿ��ÿ

ÿ��������ÿ3� �!�ÿ "3��#$�ÿ�%ÿ
�!&amp;3'�ÿÿ
��"���ÿÿ
*+,,ÿ./01ÿ2345444ÿ01160778ÿ 34:;ÿ
2345444?23=5@@@ÿ
A:&lt;ÿ
23A5444?2C=5@@@ÿ
3;:=ÿ
2CA5444?2B=5@@@ÿ
&lt;:&gt;ÿ
2BA5444?2=@5@@@ÿ
3C:3ÿ
2A45444?2&gt;=5@@@ÿ
@:&gt;ÿ
2&gt;A5444?2@@5@@@ÿ
;:&lt;ÿ
23445444?23=@5@@@ÿ
C&gt;:3ÿ
23A45444?23@@5@@@ÿ
3:@ÿ
2C445444ÿDEÿFDE+ÿ
3:4ÿ
G+HI01ÿJD6,+/D7HÿK1LDF+ÿ 2=&lt;53CAÿ
MD6EL+NÿC43;ÿOF+EIL01ÿPDFF61I.8ÿM6EQ+8ÿ

�!&amp;3'�ÿ��(���3&amp;ÿ ����#�#�ÿ
����)ÿ
;:&lt;ÿ
=:3ÿ
=:=ÿ
B:Bÿ
&lt;:@ÿ
@ÿ
&lt;:Cÿ
@:=ÿ
3B:Cÿ
3A:Aÿ
3=:3ÿ
C3:&gt;ÿ
33:Bÿ
33:@ÿ
C4:&lt;ÿ
3B:=ÿ
&gt;:=ÿ
A:=ÿ
=:&lt;ÿ
;:Bÿ
2;=5;&lt;&lt;ÿ
2A@543&lt;ÿ

!3�3$#�ÿ
&gt;:&lt;ÿ
A:Bÿ
33:3ÿ
34:&gt;ÿ
3=:Bÿ
3&lt;:Aÿ
3Cÿ
3C:Cÿ
=:Bÿ
B:&lt;ÿ
2A45&lt;4Bÿ

�88��4��ÿ6�4eÿ���6�ÿ%6�58ÿfÿ�487g�6e784ÿ
�����8ÿh�ÿ

�#R�'ÿ%�' �ÿ#���#�ÿ#"�'#$��SÿTUVWÿ
XD.07ÿ*0YDEÿZDEL+ÿ
ÿÿÿA?[+0Eÿ\ÿP/01]+ÿ
ÿÿÿ34?[+0Eÿ\ÿP/01]+ÿ
^F_7D8+Hÿ
ÿÿÿA?[+0Eÿ\ÿP/01]+ÿ
ÿÿÿ34?[+0Eÿ\ÿP/01]+ÿ
`1+F_7D8+Hÿ
ÿÿÿA?[+0Eÿ\ÿP/01]+ÿ
ÿÿÿ34?[+0Eÿ\ÿP/01]+ÿ
`1+F_7D8F+1.ÿa0.+ÿ
ÿÿÿA?[+0Eÿ\ÿP/01]+ÿ
ÿÿÿ34?[+0Eÿ\ÿP/01]+ÿ
MD6EL+Nÿ̀Mÿb6E+06ÿDcÿ*0YDEÿM.0d,dL,ÿ

01ÿ

����#�#�ÿ����)ÿ !3�3$#�ÿ
345;AAÿ
=5&lt;&lt;B5&lt;3Aÿ
=:&lt;\ÿ
4\ÿ
?;:C\ÿ
?C:A\ÿ
3453BBÿ
=5;A&gt;5C&gt;Cÿ
&lt;:=\ÿ
@:&gt;\ÿ
?A:;\ÿ
4\ÿ
ACCÿ
CC;5A=Bÿ
?B;\ÿ
?=;:&lt;\ÿ
?3;:B4\ÿ
?BA:&gt;\ÿ
=:@\ÿ
=:;\ÿ
?B&lt;:&lt;\ÿ
?=@:A\ÿ
?34:@\ÿ
?B=:B\ÿ

�ÿ

3456578ÿ

5 54�ÿ�ÿ
�6�7��587�6�ÿ

��ÿ�����ÿ���ÿÿ!�"#�ÿ
$��%&amp;'()%���ÿ"��ÿ(!�"ÿ���ÿ*($"+�ÿ
(,ÿ���ÿ)�"ÿ-�ÿ.��'�$ÿ/($��)ÿ0 +ÿ
12ÿ34$"�$ÿ(,ÿ.5("ÿ6�7+7*+89ÿÿ;�-+ÿ
'(0ÿ$��%&amp;'()%���ÿ"��ÿ"�&amp;"�+���+ÿ
ÿ+-#�-&lt;*��ÿ*��#�ÿ+-�*�ÿ���ÿ)�"+ÿ
(,ÿ���ÿ"�*�++-(��ÿ0���ÿ% �)ÿ&amp;�(&amp;'�ÿ
'�=ÿ���ÿ/($��)ÿ�&gt;ÿ���ÿ6���ÿ�(ÿ'((?ÿ
,("ÿ0("?ÿ�'+�0��"�9ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ0-��ÿ
'(0ÿ$��%&amp;'()%���ÿ"��+ÿ�&gt;ÿ
-�*"�+-�#ÿ*(+�+ÿ(,ÿ'-!-�#�ÿ5$+-��++ÿ
�&gt;ÿ(���"ÿ+�?��('&gt;�"ÿ-�&amp;$�ÿ,"(%ÿ
��"($#�($�ÿ���ÿ/($��)ÿ�&gt;ÿ���ÿ
"�#-(�ÿ�%&amp;�+-@�ÿ���ÿ���ÿ/($��)ÿ-+ÿ
�(0ÿ�A&amp;�"-��*-�#ÿ���ÿ(&amp;&amp;(+-��ÿ
&amp;"(5'�%Bÿ-�C+ÿ5�*(%�ÿ-�*"�+-�#')ÿ
&gt;-D*$'�ÿ,("ÿ5$+-��++ÿ�(ÿ&lt;�&gt;ÿ�&gt;ÿ
"��-�ÿ0("?�"+9ÿE �ÿ,"(%ÿ���ÿ
F-*�-#�ÿE�&amp;"�%���ÿ(,ÿ.5("ÿ�&gt;ÿ
G"(0��ÿ+�(0+ÿ����ÿ5��0���ÿ����H
���I�ÿ���ÿ�$%5�"ÿ(,ÿJ(5+ÿ-�ÿ���ÿ
/($��)ÿ-�*"�+�&gt;ÿ5)ÿ(!�"ÿ��2�ÿ
0�-'�ÿ���ÿ&amp;(&amp;$'7(�ÿ-�*"�+�&gt;ÿ5)ÿ
'�++ÿ���ÿ�29ÿ/(��"-5$7�#ÿ,*�("+ÿ
-�*'$&gt;�ÿ���ÿ'(++ÿ(,ÿ)($�#ÿ,%-'-�+ÿ
�&gt;ÿ���ÿ#-�#ÿ(,ÿ���ÿ&amp;(&amp;$'7(�Kÿ
�-#�ÿ*(+�+ÿ(,ÿ'-!-�#�ÿ-�*'$&gt;-�#ÿ
�($+-�#ÿ�&gt;ÿ�"�+&amp;("�7(�ÿ*(+�+Kÿ
'-%-��&gt;ÿ&gt;)*"�ÿ(&amp;7(�+Kÿ�&gt;ÿÿ
%-+% �*�ÿ-�ÿ���ÿ+?-''+ÿ���&gt;�&gt;ÿ5)ÿ
�%&amp;'()�"+ÿ�&gt;ÿ��(+�ÿ&amp;(++�++�&gt;ÿ5)ÿ
���ÿ�A-+7�#ÿ0("?,("*�9ÿ;��ÿ
0("?,("*�ÿ+�("�#�ÿ-+ÿ&amp;"7*$'"')ÿ
&amp;"(�($�*�&gt;ÿ-�ÿ�($"-+%H"�'��&gt;ÿ
-�&gt;$+�"-�+�ÿ#"-*$'�$"��ÿ�&gt;ÿ��'��ÿ
*"��ÿ0�-*�ÿ% ?�ÿ$&amp;ÿÿ+-#�-&lt;*��ÿ
+�"�ÿ(,ÿ���ÿ/($��)C+ÿ�*(�(%-*ÿ
*7!-�)9ÿÿ

ÿ

3LM4NO56ÿ

P&gt;$*7(�'ÿQ -�%���ÿ"��+ÿ"�ÿ�ÿ
-%&amp;("���ÿ*(�+-&gt;�"7(�ÿ,("ÿ
5$+-��++�ÿ&amp;"7*$'"')ÿ?�(0'�&gt;#�H
5+�&gt;ÿ5$+-��++�+�ÿ0�-*�ÿ(=��ÿ+��?ÿ
�(ÿ'(*��ÿ-�ÿ*(%%$�-7�+ÿ���ÿ"�ÿ
�(%�ÿ�(ÿ�ÿ�&gt;$*��&gt;ÿ0("?,("*�9ÿ
.��'�$ÿ/($��)ÿ-+ÿ�(%�ÿ�(ÿ(��ÿ(,ÿ
���ÿ%(+�ÿ�-#�')H�&gt;$*��&gt;ÿ
&amp;(&amp;$'7(�+ÿ-�ÿ���ÿ6���ÿ(,ÿ
F-*�-#�Bÿ0�-'�ÿ��2ÿ(,ÿ"�+-&gt;���+ÿ
+���0-&gt;�ÿ�!�ÿÿ5*��'("C+ÿ&gt;�#"��ÿ
("ÿ�-#��"�ÿR�2ÿ(,ÿ.��'�$ÿ/($��)ÿ
"�+-&gt;���+ÿ(!�"ÿ���ÿ#�ÿ(,ÿ�1ÿ�!�ÿÿ
5*��'("C+ÿ&gt;�#"��ÿ("ÿ�-#��"9ÿ;��ÿ
"��ÿ-+ÿ�!��ÿ�-#��"ÿ-�ÿP%&amp;-"��ÿ0��"�ÿ
112ÿ(,ÿ"�+-&gt;���+ÿ(!�"ÿ���ÿ#�ÿ(,ÿ�1ÿ
�!�ÿÿ5*��'("C+ÿ&gt;�#"��ÿ("ÿ�-#��"9ÿ
S�2ÿ�!�ÿÿ�-#�ÿ+*�(('ÿ&gt;-&amp;'(% ÿ("ÿ
�-#��"ÿ3���IÿT%�"-*�ÿ/(%%$�-�)ÿ
6$"!�)89ÿ
;��+�ÿ�-#�ÿ�&gt;$*7(�'ÿQ -�%���ÿ
"��+ÿ'-?�')ÿ"�U�*�ÿ�ÿ-�ÿ&amp;"��ÿ���ÿ'"#�ÿ
�$%5�"+ÿ(,ÿ*(''�#�H�&gt;$*��&gt;ÿ
&amp;"(,�++-(�'+ÿ���ÿ�!�ÿ%-#"��&gt;ÿ�(ÿ
���ÿ"�#-(�ÿ&amp;(+�H"�7"�%���9ÿÿ

^��ÿ(,ÿ���ÿ%(+�ÿ-%&amp;("���ÿ�($"-+%H
"�'��&gt;ÿ&gt;"-!�"+ÿ-�ÿ���ÿ_-''#�ÿ(,ÿ
P%&amp;-"�ÿ-+ÿ���ÿ6'��&amp;-�#ÿ4�"ÿE$��+ÿ
` 7(�'ÿ.?�+�("�9ÿ^!�"ÿ�9�ÿ%-''-(�ÿ
&amp;�(&amp;'�ÿ!-+-�ÿ���ÿ&amp;"?ÿ��$'')ÿ�&gt;ÿ
��"')ÿÿa$"��"ÿ(,ÿÿ%-''-(�ÿ&amp;�(&amp;'�ÿ
#(ÿ�(ÿ���ÿ6'��&amp;-�#ÿ4�"ÿE$��+ÿ
_-+-�("ÿ/����"ÿ0-��-�ÿ���ÿ_-''#�ÿ
'-%-�+ÿ(�ÿ�ÿ��$'ÿ5+-+9ÿb-��ÿ
&amp;"(%(7(�ÿ�&gt;ÿ0 "���++ÿ(,ÿ���ÿ
` 7(�'ÿc"?ÿ(�ÿ���ÿ"-+��ÿ!-+-�7(�ÿ
�+ÿ-�*"�+�&gt;ÿ&gt;"% 7*'')ÿ(!�"ÿ���ÿ
'+�ÿ���ÿ)�"+�ÿ,"(%ÿ����]�\�1ÿ
!-+-�("+ÿ-�ÿ���]ÿ�(ÿ��I�]���Iÿ-�ÿ
defgh �ÿ-�*"�+�ÿ(,ÿII29ÿ
��*"�+�&gt;ÿ!-+-�7(�ÿ�+ÿ�&gt;�ÿ�&gt;ÿ
0-''ÿ*(�7�$�ÿ�(ÿ�!��ÿ+-#�-&lt;*��ÿ
-%&amp;*�+ÿ(�ÿJ(5ÿ(&amp;&amp;("�$�-7�+ÿ�&gt;ÿ
5$+-��++ÿ"�!��$�+ÿ0-��-�ÿ���ÿ
_-''#�9ÿÿ

ijW4M��M�ÿ

b�-'�ÿ#"-*$'�$"�ÿ-�+�',ÿ**($��+ÿ,("ÿ
ÿ"�'7!�')ÿ+% ''ÿ&amp;"(&amp;("7(�ÿ(,ÿ
.��'�$ÿ/($��)C+ÿ�*(�(%)ÿ3�2ÿ(,ÿ
J(5+8�ÿ#"-*$'�$"�ÿ-+ÿÿ+-#�-&lt;*��ÿ&amp;"�ÿ
(,ÿ���ÿ/($��)C+ÿk5"�&gt;�lÿ*"�7�#ÿÿ
+��+�ÿ(,ÿ&amp;'*�ÿ���ÿ&gt;"-!�+ÿ�($"-+%ÿ
V5MWX7ÿ
�&gt;ÿ*(��"-5$��+ÿ�(ÿ���ÿ*(%%$�-�)C+ÿ
;($"-+%ÿ-+ÿÿ,($�&gt;7(�ÿ(,ÿ���ÿ
a$'-�)ÿ(,ÿ'-,�9ÿ��ÿ+$+�-�+ÿ5$+-��++�+ÿ
/($��)C+ÿ�*(�(%)�ÿ�&gt;ÿ*�+ÿ+ÿ-�+ÿ '-?�ÿ,"$-�ÿ&amp;"(*�++("+ÿ�&gt;ÿ"��-'ÿ
%(+�ÿ!-+-5'�ÿ�*(�(%-*ÿ&gt;"-!�"9ÿ
($�'��+9ÿb��C+ÿ%("��ÿ
;($"-+%H"�'��&gt;ÿJ(5+ÿ3-�*'$&gt;-�#ÿ
���"�&amp;"���$"-'ÿ,((&gt;ÿ�&gt;ÿ,"%-�#ÿ
��(+�ÿ-�ÿY��-'KÿT"�+�ÿP���"�-�%����ÿ "�'��&gt;ÿ*7!-�)ÿ�+ÿ5�*(%�ÿ�ÿ
�&gt;ÿY�*"�7(�Kÿ�&gt;ÿ
�*(�(%-*ÿ�''% "?ÿ(,ÿ.��'�$ÿ
T**(%%(&gt;7(�ÿ�&gt;ÿZ((&gt;ÿ6�"!-*�+8ÿ /($��)�ÿ*"�7�#ÿ��0ÿ-���"�+�ÿ
**($��ÿ,("ÿ��2ÿ(,ÿ���ÿ/($��)C+ÿ "�#-(�'')ÿ�&gt;ÿ+���H0-&gt;�ÿ-�ÿ'(*'ÿ
�(�'ÿJ(5+�ÿ�%&amp;'()-�#ÿ(!�"ÿ��R��ÿ ,((&gt;+�ÿ��"($#�ÿ,"%�"+ÿ% "?��+�ÿ
�%&amp;'()��+9ÿÿ;��+�ÿJ(5+ÿ"�ÿ�)&amp;-*'')ÿ 0-��"-�+�ÿ,((&gt;ÿ&amp;"(*�++-�#�ÿ�&gt;ÿ
'(0�"H&amp;)-�#ÿ�&gt;ÿ+�+(�'ÿ-�ÿ
(���"ÿ,((&gt;H"�'��&gt;ÿ�*(�(%-*ÿ
��$"��ÿ0-��ÿ!�"#�ÿ��$'ÿ
*7!-�)9ÿÿ
�"�-�#+ÿ(,ÿ[�\��]R�ÿ*(%&amp;"�&gt;ÿ�(ÿ
��$'ÿ!�"#�ÿ�"�-�#+ÿ(,ÿ[RR�]�]ÿ ÿ
,("ÿ''ÿJ(5+ÿ-�ÿ���ÿ/($��)9ÿÿ
01ÿ

ÿ

nopqrsqtuvÿpqÿÿxyzÿÿ0{|ÿ

�ÿ
TUVWXÿZ[\]^_[à]bÿÿ
T]]^cdUefec^a+ÿVgh[f^dW[g]cijeg^a+ÿXfk`[l^aÿ

ÿ

mjglÿ_[\]^_[à]ÿji^ÿ̀enegoÿp^`[qÿc_^ÿr^a^ijÿ̀s[n^iclÿU^n^ÿ̀trsUu+ÿp\cÿjgÿ^n^gÿoi^jc^iÿg\fp^iÿ[vÿ_[\]^_[à]ÿji^ÿq_jcÿ
wgec^aÿxjlÿhj``]ÿTUVWXÿyÿjgÿjhi[glfÿv[iÿT]]^cÿUefec^a+ÿVgh[f^ÿW[g]cijeg^a+ÿXfk`[l^a/ÿTUVWXÿ_[\]^_[à]ÿ_jn^ÿeg{
h[f^]ÿjp[n^ÿc_^ÿrsU+ÿp\cÿ]|`ÿ̀]ci\oo`^ÿc[ÿj}[iaÿpj]ehÿ_[\]^_[àÿg^h^]]e|^]/ÿTÿ2530ÿwgec^aÿxjlÿi^k[icÿea^g|~^]ÿc_^ÿ
h[]cÿ[vÿpj]ehÿg^^a]ÿv[iÿ^jh_ÿh[\gclÿegÿmeh_eojg+ÿjgaÿc_^ÿg\fp^iÿ[vÿ_[\]^_[à]ÿ^jigegoÿp^`[qÿc_e]ÿjf[\gcÿyÿc_^ÿTUVWXÿ
_i^]_[à/ÿÿ
ÿ

� �9�ÿ ��6� �7ÿ#��"8"9�ÿ6�7$6�:9�6ÿÿ

ÿ

� ��8�ÿ
66786ÿ
��9��6"88ÿ
��6�ÿ
9�97ÿ
:�9"6��6ÿÿ
;9�&lt;9�&lt;9ÿ
�66�99�ÿ
598��66ÿ
58��9�&lt;66ÿ
=68��7ÿ
58��8$9ÿ

56789ÿ � 6�����6�ÿ�ÿ�ÿ� ��6� �7�ÿ �ÿ�ÿ
%ÿ�7����&amp;ÿ'ÿ
��6� �7ÿ �9�6ÿ ��9�ÿ9�6ÿ����ÿ ��6� �7�ÿ8ÿ#8$�6ÿ�7���ÿ 8�9�&amp;ÿ'ÿ
���6ÿ
��6� �7�ÿÿ ! "6���ÿ
��6��� �6�ÿ
()*+),-ÿ
()0+4,,ÿ
()*+-))ÿ
(-3+53,ÿ

./01ÿ
,/)1ÿ
0/,1ÿ
,/)1ÿ

2,1ÿ
201ÿ
201ÿ
2*1ÿ

341ÿ
351ÿ
321ÿ
331ÿ

(3*+*42ÿ
(3.+3,,ÿ
(3,+.2)ÿ
(3.+2*5ÿ

(-.+-5,ÿ
(--+2))ÿ
(--+.5,ÿ
(-4+0*5ÿ

(--+534ÿ
()5+-4)ÿ
(-*+3,.ÿ
()3+4.-ÿ
()3+5.,ÿ
()3+4-)ÿ
(-3+,5)ÿ

)/)1ÿ
35/)1ÿ
0/31ÿ
33/-1ÿ
331ÿ
./-1ÿ
0/21ÿ

2-1ÿ
201ÿ
251ÿ
2-1ÿ
2.1ÿ
2,1ÿ
2-1ÿ

351ÿ
3*1ÿ
,1ÿ
3)1ÿ
3-1ÿ
3*1ÿ
3-1ÿ

(3.+,02ÿ
(3,+5),ÿ
(3,+,-2ÿ
(30+--*ÿ
(30+--*ÿ
(30+53*ÿ
(3,+3.2ÿ

(-,+0)5ÿ
(-4+-5,ÿ
(-0+05,ÿ
(-2+)-2ÿ
(--+*5,ÿ
(-3+.4*ÿ
(-*+5*)ÿ

&gt;?@ABCDÿFGHICJÿKLMNÿOPQRÿ

ÿÿ01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

UUVWXWYÿ�ZYX[\ÿ�ZY]^X_ÿ�[Y`^U]ÿ

Fÿ3#!;#�T8"ÿa?83�#?ÿ683E#?ÿ8�8"G!bÿ28ÿ5��;�5?#;ÿIGÿ3#8"ÿ#?8?#ÿ5���"?8�?ÿ18�;J#ÿJBFÿ!�ÿ&lt;,%(ÿ7�3ÿ8""ÿ5���T#ÿ!�ÿ
D�3?:2#?ÿ&gt;!5:!�8�KÿA:#ÿ8�8"G!ÿ8�8"Gd#ÿ;#68�;ÿÿ73�6ÿL83!��ÿ;#6��38H:!5ÿ�3��Hÿ7�3ÿ6�"T4786!"Gÿ:��!��ÿ?GH#ÿ
73�6ÿH�?#�T8"ÿa6�L#3bÿI�?:ÿ!�!;#ÿ8�;ÿ��?!;#ÿ?:#ÿ?�;Gÿ83#8KÿA:#ÿ5�6H"#?#ÿ?�;Gÿ8�;ÿ6#?:�;�"��Gÿ!ÿ8L8!"8I"#ÿ
��"!�#ÿ8?ÿ222K�#?2�3E��3?:2#?K�3�KÿÿÿÿeA8I"#ÿ*fÿ
ÿ34567589ÿ
977�9ÿ 977�9ÿ �6�897ÿ
�ÿ5�95ÿ9 6ÿ �6�897ÿ
4 76��6756�ÿÿÿ �9 �65ÿ �9 �65ÿ �4��6�4 �ÿ �87� 6�36�47ÿ 675ÿ
�6�97�ÿ�ÿ �6�97�ÿ�ÿ 87�4�6ÿ
�4��6�4 ��ÿ
4 76�ÿ 6756�ÿ

�6�897ÿ
�4�6ÿ�9�6ÿ

�����ÿ!��"#ÿÿ %&amp;ÿ
'(ÿ
)'*+,,,ÿ
-(.ÿ
)//,ÿ
)&amp;0+,,,ÿ
1�2#34!�5�6#ÿ ,ÿ
%/ÿ
)&lt;0+,,,ÿ
%*.ÿ
)/&lt;/ÿ
)0&lt;+,,,ÿ
786!"!#9
:��#:�";ÿ
1�2#34!�5�6#ÿ ,ÿ
%&lt;ÿ
)'(+/,,ÿ
&amp;,.ÿ
)/&lt;/ÿ
)0&lt;+,,,ÿ
=��6#3ÿ
&gt;�;#38?#4!�5�6#ÿ %/ÿ
%(ÿ
)(&amp;+/,,ÿ
/%.ÿ
)*,,ÿ
)%(*+,,,ÿ
=��6#3ÿÿ
1�2#34!�5�6#ÿ ,ÿ
*ÿ
)&lt;,+,,,ÿ
-0.ÿ
)/,,ÿ
)0/+,,,ÿ
#�!�3ÿ
&gt;�;#38?#4!�5�6#ÿ -ÿ
&lt;ÿ
)'&amp;+/,,ÿ
(&amp;.ÿ
)&amp;*/ÿ
)%&amp;*+/,,ÿ
#�!�3ÿ
@!�:#34!�5�6#ÿ *ÿ
(ÿ
)0&lt;+,,,ÿ
',.ÿ
)%+%,,ÿ )&lt;*/+,,,ÿ
#�!�3ÿ
ÿA�?8"ÿ
(-ÿ
&amp;&amp;ÿ
ÿÿ
ÿÿ
ÿÿ
ÿÿ
B��35#Cÿ&lt;,%/ÿD�3?:2#?ÿ&gt;!5:!�8�ÿA83�#?ÿ&gt;83E#?ÿF�8"G!+ÿH3#H83#;ÿIGÿ18�;J#JBFKÿJ�;#3"G!��ÿ;8?8ÿH3�L!;#;ÿIGÿ?:#ÿ
M�?#3�8"ÿN#L#��#ÿB#3L!5#OÿJBÿP#5#��!8"ÿQ#��OÿF6#3!58�ÿQ�66��!?GÿB�3L#GOÿÿ8�;ÿRSH#3!8�ÿP#5!!��ÿF�8"GT5ÿ
ÿ

�ZY]^X_ÿ9gZh`Wi^V^[\ÿ^Xÿ6jk^hUÿWX`ÿUUVWXWYÿ�ZYX[\ÿ

lÿ Fÿ:��#:�";ÿ#83�!��ÿ?:#ÿn!""8�#oÿ6#;!8�ÿ:�6#�2�#3ÿ!�5�6#ÿ�7ÿ8I��?ÿ)//+&amp;''ÿ6!�:?ÿI#ÿ8I"#ÿ?�ÿ8p�3;ÿ8ÿ:�6#ÿ

L8"�#;ÿ8?ÿ8I��?ÿ)%(,+,,,Oÿ:�2#L#3+ÿ?:#ÿ6#;!8�ÿ:�6#ÿL8"�#ÿ!�ÿ?:#ÿn!""8�#ÿ!ÿ�L#3ÿ)%0/+,,,Kÿ
lÿ ((.ÿ�7ÿ3#�?#3ÿH8Gÿ6�3#ÿ?:8�ÿ',.ÿ�7ÿ?:#!3ÿ!�5�6#ÿ��ÿ:��!��ÿ5�?Kÿÿ
lÿ M�ÿ�3;#3ÿ?�ÿ8p�3;ÿ?:#ÿ6#;!8�ÿ6��?:"Gÿ3#�?ÿ!�ÿ1##"8�8�ÿQ���?G+ÿ2�3E#3ÿ�##;ÿ?�ÿ#83�ÿ8?ÿ"#8?ÿ)%-K-'ÿH#3ÿ:��3+ÿ�3ÿ
)'(+-,,ÿH#3ÿG#83Kÿ
ÿ
00ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

3456789ÿ �6ÿ

�������ÿ�������ÿ��ÿ����ÿ����ÿ��ÿ�!!"ÿ$���%��ÿ&amp;��ÿ�'��$�(!�ÿ������)*ÿ��$ÿ(������ÿ��ÿ���ÿ���!�$�ÿ+��,��-����ÿ��$ÿ
��(��$���$ÿ������)*ÿ����ÿ�+.������ÿ��ÿ$���ÿ���ÿ$�'�����ÿ�/.��ÿ��$ÿ.�����ÿ�&amp;ÿ�'��$�(!�ÿ������)*ÿ��ÿ0�!!ÿ��ÿ���ÿ1���2
���ÿ����+�ÿ!�1�!�ÿ��$ÿ.�.�!�%���ÿ���1�$3ÿÿ

54677884� 9ÿ: �;88&lt;9ÿ4ÿ=4897&lt; �ÿ;&gt;4?;@=ÿA456789ÿ76ÿ?B8?ÿ;6Cÿ
D����!ÿ������)ÿ��ÿ&amp;��-��!�ÿ������)ÿ����ÿ��ÿ+�$�ÿ�'��$�(!�*ÿ�����)�ÿ.�(!��ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ��(��$���*ÿ��ÿ!�0Eÿ��$ÿ
+�$�����-����+�ÿ�������!$�3ÿF��$ÿ�������%���ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ������!�ÿ!�+��ÿ���ÿ����!�ÿ.����ÿ��ÿ����ÿ&amp;��ÿ�ÿ�.���2
�$ÿ��+(��ÿ�&amp;ÿ/����3ÿG'��$�(�!��/ÿ+�/ÿ(�ÿ)��������$ÿ&amp;��ÿ.����$�ÿ���)��)ÿ&amp;��+ÿHIÿ/����ÿ��ÿ.��.�����/3ÿ
J�����)ÿ��ÿ�/.���!!/ÿ�1��!�(!�ÿ��ÿ�������!$�ÿ������)ÿKILÿ��ÿ!���ÿ�&amp;ÿ���ÿ����ÿ+�$���ÿ����+�ÿMGNOP3ÿ
Q4RS48ÿA456789ÿ76ÿ?B8?ÿ;6Cÿ

D����!ÿÿ������)ÿ��ÿ&amp;��-��!�ÿ������)*ÿ!�����$ÿ����ÿ�+.!�/+���ÿ�������*ÿ����ÿ��ÿ�'��$�(!�ÿ��ÿ�������!$�ÿ0���ÿ�����$ÿ
����+�3ÿT��,&amp;����ÿ������)ÿ+�/ÿ(�ÿ������ÿ��(��$���$ÿ��ÿ����(��$���$*ÿ��$ÿ��ÿ�U��ÿ+��,���$ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ0���ÿ+�$��2
���-ÿ��$ÿ����/-!�1�!ÿ����+��ÿ!�,�ÿ��������*ÿ.�!���ÿ�V����*ÿ+�$���!ÿ�����������*ÿ�V��ÿ0��,���*ÿ��������%��ÿ0��,2
���*ÿ��$ÿ�����!ÿ��$ÿ����������ÿ���'3ÿW�����!!/ÿ�����ÿ����.�%���ÿ����ÿ�.ÿ��ÿHIILÿ�&amp;ÿ���ÿ����ÿ+�$���ÿ����+�ÿMGNOP3ÿÿ

X5::4YZÿA456789ÿ76ÿ?B8?ÿ;6Cÿ

J�����)ÿ����ÿ��ÿ+�$�ÿ�'��$�(!�ÿ��ÿ����$����ÿ0���ÿ��(��$/ÿ����ÿ��ÿ!��,�$ÿ��ÿ��..���ÿ���1����ÿ����ÿ��ÿ+����!ÿ���!��ÿ
����*ÿ�+.!�/+���ÿ��ÿ[�(ÿ�������)ÿ����������*ÿ�$$��%��ÿ�����+���*ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ���1����ÿ����ÿ��..���ÿ��$�.��$���ÿ!�12
��)3ÿ

Aÿ\766789ÿ\7??=ÿ76ÿ?B8?ÿ;6ÿ

]��ÿN�����)ÿN�$$!�ÿ��ÿ�ÿ���)�ÿ�&amp;ÿ+�$��+ÿ$�����/*ÿ+�!%-����*ÿ��ÿ�!������$ÿ������)ÿ�/.��ÿ��+.�%(!�ÿ��ÿ���!�ÿ0���ÿ
���)!�-&amp;�+�!/ÿ��+��ÿ����ÿ��!.ÿ+���ÿ���ÿ)��0��)ÿ$�+��$ÿ&amp;��ÿ0�!,�(!�ÿ!�1��)ÿ��$ÿ�+�!!��ÿ��+��3ÿO�ÿ���!�$��ÿ������)ÿ
�/.��ÿ!�,�ÿ$�.!�^��*ÿ&amp;���-.!�^��*ÿ��������/ÿ$0�!!��)ÿ�����*ÿ��$ÿ�!������$ÿ��_�)�ÿ������)ÿ$�1�!�.+����3ÿÿ
ÿÿ
a1��ÿ0�����ÿ����ÿ�&amp;ÿ�����ÿ����)�����*ÿ���ÿ�/.��ÿ��$ÿ.�����ÿ�&amp;ÿ�'��$�(!�ÿ������)ÿ1��/ÿ�����$���(!/3ÿb������ÿ����+�ÿ
!�1�!�ÿ���ÿ���$ÿ(/ÿ&amp;��$���ÿ��$ÿ������)ÿ.��1�$���ÿ��ÿ$����+���ÿ���ÿ!�1�!ÿ�&amp;ÿ�'��$�(�!��/ÿ��$ÿ���ÿ�/.�ÿ��ÿ!�1�!ÿ�&amp;ÿ��(2
��$/3ÿc��ÿ�������ÿ����+�ÿ!�1�!�ÿ(/ÿ�����/ÿ��ÿN����)��*ÿ1����ÿ0003+����)��3)�1d+��$�3ÿ
ÿ
efghijfkÿmnofjpÿeinpÿ

01ÿ

mnofjpÿeinpÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

;&lt;&lt;=&gt;?&gt;@ÿBC@?DEÿFGC?CHIGÿJK&lt;LKI&lt;Mÿ

34456768ÿ 87 ��ÿ4�7� ÿ�6�ÿ��� ���655ÿ�447ÿ� 4�ÿ�7ÿ 8����ÿ67�ÿ6����858�4�ÿ67�ÿ�4�4ÿ�4�6�7ÿ6� 7�ÿ�4ÿ
87 ��ÿ� �ÿ����67ÿ4�7���ÿ����4��ÿ �6�ÿÿ
���5 �47ÿ�7ÿ34456768ÿ 87 ÿ��ÿ�7�47�64�ÿ�7ÿ��4�7�47ÿ������ÿ�7�58�4�ÿ4��5 �47ÿ6ÿ�4ÿ34456768ÿ67��ÿ
6��7ÿ67�ÿ �4�ÿ4��5 �47ÿ6ÿ�4ÿ!�67�ÿ"�6�4��4ÿ#67�ÿ$ÿ%&amp;6�6ÿ67�ÿ����4�6ÿ'7��67�(�ÿ 8����)�4564�ÿ
�7�8���4��ÿ67�ÿ�465�ÿ�6�4�ÿ���5 �47ÿ�7ÿ 8����)�4564�ÿ�7�8���4��ÿ�7�58��7�ÿ�4ÿ*���� �6+ 7ÿ67�ÿ, �ÿ
4����4�ÿ�4� ��ÿ-46�5�ÿ67�ÿ*��.�74�6�7�47�ÿ�4��4�47�ÿ6�8ÿ/01ÿ$ÿ655ÿ4��5 �47ÿ�7ÿ�4ÿ 87 �ÿ2 �4�4��ÿ
�4�68�4ÿ4��5 �47ÿ6ÿ�4ÿ34456768ÿ67��ÿ6��7ÿ67�ÿ�4564�ÿ�8��74��4�ÿ��ÿ�874�ÿ6�ÿ3! �4�7�474ÿ4��5 �47ÿ
�84ÿ ÿ�74�����ÿ�ÿ�4ÿ!�67�ÿ"�6�4��4ÿ#67�ÿ$ÿ%&amp;6�6ÿ67�ÿ����4�6ÿ'7��67��ÿ�4ÿ6�865ÿ78��4�ÿ$ÿ�7�����865�ÿ
4��5 4�ÿ�7ÿ 8����)�4564�ÿ�7�8��ÿ��ÿ5�645ÿ ÿ�4ÿ7 6�5ÿ����4�ÿ�67ÿ�4��4��ÿ%�4�ÿ����67ÿ�7�8���4�ÿ�7�58�4ÿ
7��8�+ 7ÿ67�ÿ-465ÿ��64�ÿ46��ÿ$ÿ�����ÿ6��87ÿ$�ÿ6�8ÿ71ÿ$ÿ655ÿ4��5 �47�ÿÿ*����858�4ÿ4��5 �ÿ6�8ÿ81ÿ
$ÿ�4ÿ 65ÿ� �6$��49ÿ�8ÿ��ÿ�774�+ 7ÿ ÿ �4�ÿ�7�8���4�ÿ��85�ÿ�4ÿ7 4��ÿ6�ÿ6����858�4ÿ����4�ÿ6ÿ���7�:�67ÿ
6� 87ÿ$ÿ 8����ÿ67�ÿ47�4��4748��65ÿ6�+��ÿ�7ÿ�4ÿ 87 �ÿ
O?P@QDLEÿ
RCSQÿ F&gt;L?I?TQÿ
U&gt;=&lt;Qÿ VK&lt;L&gt;T&lt;ÿF&gt;L?I?TQÿ
6��7�ÿ
W�8X0ÿ Y7W�ZW[�\XXÿ YXXX�\W7�]/8ÿ
Y[/�\Z/ÿ
VGGCHHCP&gt;^C?ÿ&gt;?Pÿ_CCPÿU&lt;LKIG&lt;Qÿ
`àbcÿ dbeabfgabfhÿ dihacbfaijiÿ
dbhàfhÿ
7��8�+ 7ÿ
W�08]ÿ YZ0�WW7�777ÿ Y77�W0[�7Z[ÿ
YX8�/\]ÿ
-465ÿ��64ÿ67�ÿ-4765ÿ67�ÿ346��7�ÿ
W�08Zÿ YXW�80W�[0[ÿ YWX7�[WZ�7X7ÿ
Y/7�[W8ÿ
k&lt;D&gt;I=ÿlL&gt;P&lt;ÿ
egeÿ db`afjjammfÿ dhiahbbaif`ÿ
dbhafmcÿ
*����858�4�ÿ,�4���ÿ,����7�ÿ67�ÿ287+7�ÿ
870ÿ YW7�7X7�/[]ÿ Y8]�WZ]�7/7ÿ
Y/[�/Z0ÿ
2465�ÿ6�4ÿ67�ÿ ��65ÿ*����67�4ÿ
8Z/ÿ YX\�\Z8�X]Zÿ Y]]�W87�/Z\ÿ
Y[/�X[[ÿ
n�$4���765�ÿ��47+:��ÿ67�ÿ"4��7��65ÿ4����4�ÿ 808ÿ Y/8�\W8�77Wÿ Y[/�[0\�Z/0ÿ
YX7�XZ8ÿ
,�767�4ÿ67�ÿ'7�8�67�4ÿ
]87ÿ YX]�78Z�X]Zÿ Y8\�Z]7�0]Wÿ
Y[Z�Z[Zÿ
%�4�ÿ4����4�ÿ�4o�4�ÿn8�5��ÿ*���7���6+ 7(ÿ [7Wÿ YWZ�[//�]/]ÿ Y/7�0/\�X8[ÿ
Y/Z�[8Xÿ
p678$6�8��7�ÿ
[\8ÿ Y//�8/8�[7\ÿ YW/\�70[�70Wÿ
YX\�8W\ÿ
*���7���6+�4ÿ67�ÿ8���ÿ67�ÿq6�4ÿp676�4r Z\Wÿ YWX�X]7�W]Zÿ Y/7�[XZ�0\7ÿ
Y/8�87[ÿ
�47ÿ67�ÿ-4�4��6+ 7ÿ4����4�ÿ
VLDQaÿF?D&lt;LD&gt;I?H&lt;?Daÿ&gt;?Pÿk&lt;GL&lt;&gt;^C?ÿ
gchÿ deae`mamcmÿ d`fàmeacihÿ
dbmabhcÿ
q�54�654ÿ"�6�4ÿ
X[Xÿ YWW�7X0�W8Wÿ YX/�X8[�8\]ÿ
YXX�878ÿ
��8�6+ 765ÿ4����4�ÿ
/XWÿ Y[�/[]�\0Xÿ Y8�7X[�077ÿ
Y//�8[8ÿ
'7$��6+ 7ÿ
W0]ÿ YZ�/W8�/Z0ÿ YW\�W7Z�\WXÿ
YX7�8\[ÿ
p�7�7��ÿs86���7��ÿ67�ÿ%�5ÿ67�ÿ!6�ÿ�o�6�+ 7ÿ 7\ÿ Y\�[/]�/[7ÿ Y/W�\8\�8[]ÿ
Y\8�00Xÿ
"�67���6+ 7ÿ67�ÿq6�4�8��7�ÿ
7]ÿ YX�]][�[]7ÿ YW0�X0\�8[]ÿ
YX\�W\Xÿ
p676�4�47ÿ$ÿ ��67�4�ÿ67�ÿ�74�����4�ÿ WZÿ YX[Z�X[0ÿ
Y]\X�XZ[ÿ
Y/[�XWWÿ
t+5�+4�ÿ
uW0ÿ Y/]]�W]/ÿ
Y770�[7\ÿ
YX\�0/Xÿ
WW�8]7ÿ YZX0�8//�[7Wÿ YW�/88�[Z0�]/Wÿ YX]�[7\ÿ
ÿ
8��4vÿt ÿ#8�468ÿ$ÿ36��ÿ6+�+��ÿ
01ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

345678ÿ54ÿ

���ÿ��ÿ������ÿ����ÿ���ÿ��ÿ���������ÿ
��������ÿ�������ÿ������ÿ�ÿ!"ÿ�#ÿ
$���ÿ%���&amp;'(�)�*ÿ+�ÿ���ÿ�����,��ÿ
����ÿ��)ÿ)����)ÿ#��ÿ������ÿ����ÿ
����������ÿ����ÿ������ÿ(���ÿ������ÿ
�����������&amp;ÿ���������*ÿ%������&amp;�ÿ
���ÿ-������ÿ��������ÿ��.����ÿ��)����ÿ
���#��������ÿ���.�����ÿ����)���ÿ
/ ����ÿ#����&amp;ÿ�����ÿ��&amp;�����ÿ
������&amp;�ÿ�������&amp;ÿ��)ÿ���ÿ���.����0ÿ
��ÿ(���ÿ��ÿ��)����)���ÿ������ÿ����ÿ
���.�)���ÿ����)���ÿ)�����ÿ���.����*ÿ
1�����ÿ�����ÿ���.����ÿ���ÿ��ÿ�ÿ
��)����ÿ2��3ÿ#��ÿ���ÿ����ÿ�����ÿ
�����)���ÿ5������ÿ���ÿ-������ÿ��ÿ
(���'����,���)ÿ��ÿ��������6�ÿ
�����������&amp;ÿ��ÿ���ÿ���(��ÿ��ÿ
������ÿ����ÿ���.����ÿ��)ÿ)����)*ÿÿÿ

3898:;4&lt;8ÿ=&gt;?5@7A&lt;7A4ÿ

B�������ÿ��)ÿ����)���)ÿ��ÿ
��������ÿ�����������&amp;ÿ���������ÿ��ÿ
����,��ÿ�ÿ�����,,.�ÿ��.��������ÿ
#��ÿ��(ÿ��������ÿ
��.�������*ÿÿÿC������ÿ��.�����ÿ�#ÿ
�������� ����,���ÿ��)ÿ����'
����)ÿ��������ÿ���ÿ���,���ÿ��ÿ��)�&amp;D�ÿ
�������ÿ�����,���Eÿÿ����'�����ÿ
����'����)ÿF�������ÿ��#���������ÿ
��ÿ�ÿ2� ��'��.�3ÿ��ÿ�������)�,��ÿ
���ÿ�������������)�ÿ����.�,.�ÿ
�����ÿ�#ÿ��(ÿ��������ÿ���(��*ÿ
G���)����ÿ��.�ÿ�H������)ÿ���ÿ���)ÿ
#��ÿ�)���)ÿ��)ÿ#�����ÿ����)���)ÿ
��#���������ÿ�.�������ÿ��ÿ���ÿ
-������*ÿÿ

ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

=@@A4@ÿIÿ
JKKL7A&gt;8M4@ÿ

NLKA65ML&gt;ÿ85&gt;94@ÿ
O��ÿ-������D�ÿ�����,��ÿ����)�ÿ��.�ÿ
��)ÿ��)ÿ(���ÿ���,��ÿ��ÿ��.�ÿ
�����P����ÿ�������ÿ��ÿ���ÿ������&amp;�ÿ
������ÿ)����)ÿ��)ÿ.����ÿ��)ÿ��Hÿ
��.�����ÿ(���ÿ����Q���ÿ�������ÿ
��ÿ���.���ÿ)���.��&amp;ÿ��)ÿQ����&amp;*ÿÿ
+�ÿ���ÿ�����,��ÿ����ÿ��)ÿ
�������)ÿ��6�ÿ)��������ÿ)����)ÿ
#��ÿ������ÿ��ÿ�����&amp;ÿ��ÿ���Rÿ��ÿ
�������ÿ�����*ÿB���D�ÿ�����ÿ
�������ÿ�������)ÿ��6��ÿ����ÿ����ÿ
�))�,����ÿ������ÿ����ÿ(���ÿ��ÿ
���)�)ÿ�.��ÿ��ÿ��������ÿ���ÿ
������ÿ�����,��*ÿÿ+�)�ÿ��ÿ����ÿ
����)����ÿ�����ÿ��,������ÿ����ÿ���ÿ
�����ÿ#����ÿ(���ÿ�������ÿ�H������,��ÿ
���ÿ������ÿ(���#����ÿ��������*ÿO��ÿ
������&amp;ÿ��ÿ�S����ÿ�ÿ��(ÿ(���#����ÿ
(���ÿ��ÿ�������)ÿ�&amp;ÿ�����ÿ�#ÿ��.����ÿ
���������&amp;ÿ������ÿ������ÿ����ÿ��&amp;ÿ
���.���ÿ����ÿ�����,��ÿ��(ÿ
����)����ÿ#���ÿ������,��ÿ��ÿ���ÿ
����*ÿÿ
O�ÿ�)$��ÿ��ÿ��)ÿ�������ÿ#��ÿ�����ÿ
��������ÿ���ÿ-������ÿ�#ÿ5�����ÿ���ÿ
�����)��ÿ��,���ÿ����ÿ����ÿ�������ÿ
2���ÿ��ÿ������3ÿ����ÿ���ÿ������ÿ��ÿ
�����ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ���)�ÿ��)ÿ
�����,��ÿ������*ÿT��ÿ(�&amp;ÿ
���� ��,��ÿ������ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ
��ÿ������ÿ��'����ÿ���.����ÿ����ÿ
�����ÿ����ÿ���ÿ�U���)ÿ�&amp;ÿ���ÿV����ÿ
%���*ÿT����ÿ�����,.�ÿ����������ÿ
����)�ÿ����(���ÿ)�U�����ÿ�&amp;���ÿ�#ÿ
������ÿ��ÿ�������)���ÿ�������ÿ
�������)�ÿ��)ÿ��)�.�)���ÿ����ÿ��ÿÿ
������ÿ(���ÿ��ÿ��������ÿ�ÿ�����ÿ
����*ÿO����ÿ)�.����ÿ������ÿ�&amp;���ÿ
���ÿ����ÿ������ÿ&amp;�����ÿ
01ÿ

�������)�ÿ��ÿ��(ÿ����)����ÿ����ÿ
��&amp;ÿ��ÿ��.���ÿ��ÿ���ÿ����ÿ��ÿ(���ÿ
��)ÿ���ÿ�������ÿ#��ÿ�U��)����ÿ
����)��,��ÿ��,���*ÿÿT�,���ÿ����ÿ
��(�������ÿ���)��������ÿ
�����������ÿ�����&amp;ÿW���ÿ��ÿ
��������&amp;ÿ)(������ÿ�����ÿ��)ÿ�����ÿ
��ÿ�.��ÿ2,�&amp;3ÿ�����ÿ���ÿ����ÿ���ÿ
���)�ÿ�#ÿ��)��ÿ�������)��ÿ&amp;���ÿ
��������ÿ����&amp;ÿ��������ÿ��)ÿ�������ÿ
�R��ÿ��ÿ�ÿ����ÿ�U��)����ÿ�����ÿ
�����*ÿÿ

XLY?L&lt;4ÿ

O��ÿ��������ÿ�#ÿ������Z�ÿ������)�ÿ
���(��)������ÿ(���#����Z��ÿ
���)�)ÿ��ÿ������ÿ�H��,��ÿ
��������ÿ��)ÿ����ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ������ÿ
��)ÿ�S����ÿ����'��&amp;����ÿ����������ÿ
$���*ÿ[���ÿ\������ÿ%���&amp;ÿ��ÿ
�H����������ÿ����������ÿ��ÿ
���������ÿ�ÿ(���#����ÿ�.��ÿ#��ÿ
�H��,��ÿ����������ÿ���,�����&amp;ÿ
�����ÿ(���ÿ������ÿ��������ÿ���]��*ÿ
+ÿ��.�&amp;ÿ���)���)ÿ��ÿ^_`!ÿ�&amp;ÿ���ÿ
\������ÿa�������ÿ5�������ÿ
b��)�,��ÿ�)��,P�)ÿ(���#����ÿ
���������ÿ��ÿ�ÿ��&amp;ÿ����ÿ�#ÿ�������*ÿ
O��ÿ(���#����ÿ��������ÿ��ÿ�U��,��ÿ
���ÿ������ÿ�#ÿ���ÿ������ÿ#��ÿ����ÿ
����������ÿ�����ÿ(���ÿ�������ÿ
�����ÿ�����ÿ��)ÿ�H�������ÿ
�����,��*ÿ\����ÿ��)ÿ��������ÿ
��������ÿ���ÿ#������ÿ��ÿ(���#����ÿ
)�.��������ÿ������ÿ��������ÿ$��ÿ
����������ÿ������,��������ÿ��)ÿ
�����ÿ�)��,����ÿ����������0ÿ���ÿ
��ÿ���ÿ������ÿ�)$���ÿ��ÿ���ÿ������&amp;ÿ
�#ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ�����,��ÿ����ÿ��ÿ
�����������&amp;ÿ��������ÿ��,�������ÿ
���ÿ������&amp;ÿ��ÿ������ÿ��(ÿ(������ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ%���&amp;ÿ��)ÿ������ÿ��ÿ.�����&amp;ÿ
���������*ÿ\����ÿ�U����ÿ��ÿ�����.�ÿ
���ÿQ����&amp;ÿ�#ÿ��#�ÿ��)ÿ�U��)������&amp;ÿ

�ÿ

34ÿ67879ÿ3 ÿ�766ÿ��ÿ���ÿ4� 3�ÿ79ÿ
�����9ÿ9��ÿ��7��9 �ÿ4��767��ÿ
�9�ÿ�3����ÿ��ÿ�9ÿ���3�ÿ9��ÿ
�9�ÿ�3�79ÿ�393�7ÿ��87��ÿ
�6�����79ÿ��87��ÿ��ÿ�9��9�ÿ
��ÿ�9�ÿ34ÿ�6��ÿ�9�ÿ
3���97��796��79ÿ3���97�ÿ
7���38���9ÿ��3� �ÿ�8�9 ÿ�9�ÿ
4��8�6ÿ!���7�66�ÿ���79ÿ��ÿ
"�3�6���ÿ��39#$ÿ��ÿ��79ÿ��ÿ
3���97�ÿ3�����ÿ�9�ÿ
������39ÿ7���38���9 ÿ��ÿ
��387��ÿ������39ÿ�9�ÿ
�9���79��9ÿ3��39ÿ43�ÿ�66ÿ��ÿ
�9�ÿ793��ÿ6�8�6� �9ÿ����ÿ
&amp;��7��ÿ�ÿ�3��ÿ��7���6�ÿ�6��ÿ3ÿ
678�ÿ�9�ÿ�3ÿ��79� �ÿ'3�79ÿ7ÿ�ÿ
�����6��6�ÿ7��3��9ÿ3��39�9ÿ
79ÿ�����9ÿ�3����(ÿ79ÿ��ÿ)�&amp;*ÿ
��8��ÿ34ÿ)��6�9��ÿ+3�9�ÿ
��79� ��ÿ,-.ÿ34ÿ���39��9 ÿ
7��ÿ��ÿ/�8�76��767�ÿ34ÿ�03����6�ÿ
�3�79ÿ43�ÿ���63���1ÿ�ÿ�ÿ
ÿ

��7����ÿ��79� ÿ��66�9��ÿ23979ÿ
��9�ÿ��ÿ79����9�66�ÿ79����ÿ
��97�ÿ3�ÿ�663�ÿ���7�39�6ÿ�3�79ÿ
����ÿ���9��76��ÿ�9ÿ����ÿ
7��3��9ÿ��7��9��6ÿ3��39ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ��ÿ9���ÿ�9�ÿ���4���9�ÿ34ÿ
79�787���6ÿ�9�ÿ4��767�ÿ��ÿ���ÿ��ÿ
633�79ÿ3ÿ��63��ÿ79ÿ&amp;��7���ÿÿ

456789:ÿ&lt;=5&gt;?@A8B8CDÿ

'3�79ÿ�03����767�ÿ��ÿ��73�ÿ
7��� ÿ39ÿF��67�ÿ34ÿ674��ÿ63�6ÿ
��79� ��ÿ�336ÿ�9�366��9�ÿ�9�ÿ
��G ÿ�����9�ÿH��9ÿ4��767�ÿ3�ÿ
�3���36�ÿ�I���7�9�ÿ�3�79ÿ3 ÿ
38�������9�ÿ���ÿ���ÿ�ÿ79�����ÿ
�7�ÿ34ÿ43��63���ÿ3�ÿ�3��6� 9� �ÿÿ
J3ÿ�837�ÿ3 ÿ38�������9�ÿ
�3���36�ÿ���ÿ�33�ÿ3ÿ678�ÿ79ÿ
�� �9����ÿ3�ÿ38���3����ÿ
�3�79�ÿ3�ÿ���ÿ���ÿ�38�ÿ3ÿ6� ÿ
�I��978�ÿ�����3K�9ÿ����6ÿ����ÿ
�7�3�ÿ797L�9ÿ��87�ÿ3�ÿ

48:QRSTUU?ÿV9CU&gt;9UCÿ89ÿWUUB@9@6ÿX569CDÿ

���63���9ÿ3��3��97���ÿJ���ÿ
�38�ÿ���9ÿ��ÿ��79� �ÿ63�ÿ
����ÿ�3�9�ÿ� 3���Mÿ�336ÿ
�9�366��9ÿ7ÿ�� ��767N���ÿ
7����9ÿ�336ÿ���� Mÿ�9�ÿ
��G ÿ79����ÿ�ÿ��7��9 ÿ
3����ÿ793ÿ3�9ÿ43�ÿ3��ÿ�336�ÿ
�9�ÿ�3��79�ÿ
O03����6�ÿ�3�79�ÿ��66ÿ�3���ÿ
��9�6�ÿ3�ÿ��6�P4��76�ÿ�3�79ÿ
�97ÿ397�9ÿ�7�ÿ796�P4��76�ÿ
��8�63���9�3����7�ÿ�93�9ÿ�ÿ
��ÿ/�779ÿ�7��6�1����ÿ�66ÿ
��3�79ÿ�3��ÿ7��3��9ÿ79ÿ
����9ÿ��ÿ9���ÿ34ÿ��ÿ
�3��43���ÿ�9ÿ�79ÿ�3��6��39�ÿ
��66ÿ�3���36��ÿ�3�9ÿ
��34� 739�6�ÿ�9�ÿ4��767��ÿH7�3�ÿ
����ÿ���63���ÿ�� 6�ÿ3ÿ�7��ÿ
F��67L��ÿ9��ÿ�3�����ÿ796��79ÿ
��39�6ÿ�9�ÿ��34� 739�6ÿ�0Mÿ�9�ÿ
�336ÿ63�ÿ3�ÿ39ÿ9��ÿ���9 �ÿÿ
J��ÿ��767�ÿ3ÿ���ÿ���ÿ9���ÿ7ÿ

Y9ÿZ[\]�ÿ��ÿ)��6�9��ÿ��979�6�ÿ&amp;393�7ÿ*3�9���39ÿ!)�&amp;*^ÿ39�� ��ÿ�ÿ��8��ÿ34ÿ��79� ÿ3�9��ÿ79ÿ)��6�9��ÿ
+3�9�ÿ39ÿ7��ÿ796��79ÿ����7��ÿ7����9ÿ��7�ÿ��79� ÿ� � ÿ�9�ÿ�3���ÿÿ_����ÿ��ÿ6��ÿ34ÿ�8�76��6�ÿ�7�P
����ÿY9��9�ÿ��87�ÿ��9���ÿ�7�ÿ39ÿ��ÿ67�ÿ��ÿ)�&amp;*ÿ� ��67���ÿ��ÿ)��6�9��ÿY9��9�ÿ*����ÿJ���ÿ!)Y*J^�ÿ����ÿ
��ÿ34ÿ63�6ÿ�6� ��`���379��ÿ3G 7�6�ÿ���67ÿ� 3�ÿ���63���ÿ�9�ÿ63�6ÿ��79� ÿ3�9��ÿ����ÿ�7�ÿ�I��7979ÿ��ÿ
��ÿ34ÿ��3����9�ÿ��87�ÿ79ÿ)��6�9��ÿ+3�9�ÿ�7�ÿ�ÿ3�6ÿ34ÿ��8�63�79ÿ�9ÿ��39ÿ�6�9ÿ3ÿ��387��ÿ�7�P����ÿ
Y9��9�ÿ� � ÿ��3��3�ÿ)��6�9��ÿ+3�9��ÿ
Y9ÿ���9���7�ÿ�7�ÿ+399� ÿa7�7�9�ÿ)Y*Jÿ��8����ÿ)��6�9��ÿ+3�9�ÿ��7��9 �ÿ��79� �ÿ�9�ÿ����36���ÿ3ÿ
7��9�4�ÿ��3����9�ÿ9���ÿ�9�ÿ��73�7���ÿ�I�63�79ÿ43�79ÿ39ÿ)7����7��ÿO�7�6����ÿ&amp;393�7ÿ��3���7��ÿ
b38��9��9�ÿ'��6�����ÿcP\Zÿ&amp;����39�ÿ���67ÿd�4���ÿJ�6�9`H3��43��ÿe�8�63���9�ÿJ3��7�ÿ�9�ÿ+3���97�ÿ
f��97N��39�ÿ)ÿY*J#ÿ���ÿL9�79 ÿ�9�ÿ��39ÿ7�� ÿ796���(ÿ
gÿ O�39ÿ�3�ÿ�3���36�ÿ�7�3�ÿ�ÿ�3��ÿY9��9�ÿ399��39�ÿi-�j.ÿ7�ÿ�ÿ6��ÿ34ÿ�8�76��767�ÿ�ÿ��ÿ���39�ÿ
gÿ --�,.ÿ34ÿ��3�6�ÿ���979ÿ6� ÿ��9ÿkli�[[[`����ÿ���ÿ�7�3�ÿ_�3����9�ÿ��87��ÿ)��ÿ34ÿ�8�76��767�ÿ7ÿ��ÿ��3�ÿ
���39ÿ7���ÿ�3��8���ÿZ-�-.ÿ34ÿ�3�ÿ79�787���6ÿ�7�ÿ��ÿ��87�ÿ��ÿ33ÿ�I��978��ÿ
gÿ +398�9��ÿ�ÿ����9ÿ�7�ÿY9��9�ÿd��87�ÿ��387���ÿ!Yd�^ÿ��3ÿ�7���ÿ����96�ÿ30��ÿ��87�ÿ79ÿ)��6�9��ÿ+3�9�ÿ
3�ÿ�7�ÿ��ÿÿ
01ÿ

�ÿ

3454678ÿ ÿ3 8ÿ�3�7��ÿ6�7ÿ�4��ÿ
���6�ÿ��ÿ87�73��576�ÿ�7��36��ÿ
��6�37��ÿ3454678ÿ4���6���6��7�ÿ
8ÿÿ3��ÿ��ÿ87�73��7��ÿ�46�ÿ6�7ÿ
7��7�47�7ÿ��ÿ� �4�ÿ�����ÿ
77878ÿ6�ÿ�438ÿ6�7�7ÿ7�ÿ����4�ÿ
6�7��ÿÿÿ
���4�ÿ� �ÿ ÿ45���6 6ÿ4���7ÿ���ÿ
6�7ÿ��34�ÿ8��4�ÿ6�7ÿ! �67�ÿ"3 ÿ
��867�ÿ�46�ÿÿ�����ÿ�ÿÿ����4�ÿ
6�6#�ÿ$��8 37ÿ6�ÿ6�7ÿ��������7ÿ
8ÿ�54347�ÿ7�%���8�ÿ&amp;�ÿ��767ÿ
5��7ÿ�����6�4�7�ÿ���ÿ����4��ÿ6�7ÿ
'433�7ÿ��ÿ(5�4�7ÿ� ÿ���487�ÿ
�7��36��ÿ������7�ÿ6�6ÿ33��ÿ
84�7��7ÿ����4�ÿ�����ÿ6�6ÿ���6ÿ
37��ÿ6�ÿ�438ÿ 8ÿ����487ÿ7�%
���8ÿ�����)4�3�84�ÿ�763�)
���ÿ�54347�ÿ 8ÿ6�7ÿ��������7�ÿÿ
*+,-./01ÿ345/+657ÿ8+9,75:+6ÿ;ÿ
&lt;+,/.6=ÿ
(5�4�7#�ÿ5 ÿ 6��3ÿ��76��ÿ
����4546ÿ6�ÿ6�7ÿ?377�4�ÿ@7�ÿ
A�7�ÿB �� 3ÿC�7����7ÿ 8ÿ
�7��7�� 3ÿ�����6�4�7�ÿ��7ÿ
7��5���ÿ45��6�ÿ�ÿ7���54�ÿ
���46ÿ���5ÿ6���4�5�ÿÿ
&amp;���4�5ÿ��57�ÿ�46�ÿ��57ÿ���7��ÿ
�ÿ87�787�7ÿ�ÿ6���4�5%�73678ÿ
48��6�47�ÿ 6��33ÿ���7�ÿ
�7�� 346ÿ4���7��ÿD�437ÿ�6�7�ÿ3��3ÿ
5�4�4�34�7�ÿ��7ÿ���7��ÿ ��6ÿ
6�7ÿ45��6ÿ��ÿ�7�� 3ÿ����4�ÿ�ÿ
7�%���8ÿ�7�4876��ÿ6�7ÿ'433�7ÿ��ÿ
(5�4�7ÿ4�ÿ3���4�ÿ6�ÿ6�7ÿÿ
������7�ÿ7�487�7% �78ÿ
������ÿ ÿ�����4�ÿ�ÿ4���7�ÿ 8ÿ
��337�7�ÿ��7�4��33ÿ45��� �ÿ
6�7ÿ'433�7ÿ��ÿ(5�4�7�ÿE�ÿ����ÿ
�763ÿ�����ÿ�4ÿ6�7ÿ467�76ÿ
7��57ÿ5��7ÿ����3��ÿ6�7�7ÿ4�ÿÿ
���7�ÿ6�6ÿ7�ÿ����4�ÿFÿ
�����3�3ÿH$��8 37Iÿ��ÿ

RSTTUVWXÿZT[\ÿ][SST\^ÿ

H��������7Iÿ����4�ÿFÿ�433ÿ7ÿ
������78�ÿ�7678�ÿ��ÿ��78ÿ���ÿ
�7�� 3ÿ�7�4876�ÿ��ÿ�4�46����ÿ��4��ÿ
���38ÿ45��6ÿ��47��7��ÿ�����3��ÿ
8ÿ6�7ÿ'433�7#�ÿ7�%���8ÿ
����67�ÿ 8ÿ�7�7ÿ��ÿ��55�46�ÿ
E36������ÿ 7�8�633�ÿ5 ÿ'433�7ÿ
�7�4876�ÿ���ÿ����4�67ÿ4ÿ��57ÿ
6�7ÿ��ÿ�7�� 3ÿ�763ÿ���46�ÿ
����378�7ÿ6�6ÿ6�74�ÿ�76��ÿ
�4�46���ÿ7��57ÿ��6ÿ��ÿ6�7ÿ� �4�ÿ��ÿ
6�7ÿ��55�46) 8ÿ�J7ÿ�����7ÿ
6�ÿ������7ÿ��57�ÿ4ÿ6�7ÿ�7�ÿ
���4�ÿ86ÿ���5ÿ6�7ÿE57�4� ÿ
K�55�46ÿ?���7ÿ�����ÿ6�6ÿ
�7�� 3ÿ����4�ÿ�46�ÿ�7ÿ
4��7�4�ÿ6ÿÿ��67�ÿ�67ÿ6� ÿ6�63ÿ
����4�ÿ�46��ÿ�ÿ7�%���8ÿ��57�ÿ
�7ÿ74�ÿ���7�678ÿ6�ÿ�7�� 3ÿ
��57��ÿE 8ÿ�ÿ3 8ÿ 8ÿ
87�73��576ÿ���6�ÿ4��7�7�ÿ
�7�� 3ÿ����4�ÿ4��7�4�3ÿ3����ÿ
34�7ÿ6�7ÿ7�6ÿ4�7�6576ÿ���ÿ��57ÿ
�4387��ÿ��ÿ87�73��7��Lÿ�46�ÿÿ
�6���ÿ5 ��76ÿ���ÿ�7�� 3ÿ��57��ÿ
8ÿ6�7ÿ 4346ÿ6�ÿ6��ÿÿ����6�ÿ
6�7�7ÿ4�ÿ5��7ÿ4�7��7ÿ6�ÿ�438ÿ
�7�� 3ÿ��57�ÿ6� ÿ6���7ÿ6�6ÿ�7ÿ
$��8 37ÿ6�ÿ6�7ÿ��������7ÿ��ÿ
�54347��ÿÿ
E6ÿ6�7ÿ�57ÿ�57�ÿ�7�� 3ÿ�763�ÿ
8ÿ6���4�5ÿ��7ÿ ÿ45���6 6ÿ
7���54�ÿ45��6�ÿ'4�46���ÿ���ÿ
3�8�7ÿ4ÿ�7�� 3ÿ�763�ÿ��78ÿ
01ÿ

5�7ÿ6ÿ3��3ÿ��47��7��ÿ 8ÿ
����7�6ÿ�� 7��ÿ�7ÿ4�7�� �ÿ4ÿ
6�7ÿ��55�46ÿ 8ÿ45����4�ÿ 8ÿ
�7� 4346� �ÿ����7�6�ÿ&amp;���4�5ÿ
����487�ÿM���ÿ������6�ÿ3��3ÿ
��47��7��ÿ 8ÿ4N�7�7�ÿ6�7ÿ
6�7�ÿ��ÿ��557��43�ÿ��47���ÿ
�7��7�� 3�ÿ 8ÿ�6�7�ÿ�48�ÿ��ÿ
87�73��576ÿ6�6ÿ������ÿ�7�7�ÿ
D�6#�ÿ5��7�ÿ�4�46���ÿ���ÿ
7��7�47�7ÿ6�7ÿ��55�46#�ÿ�4O�7ÿ
�7�7ÿ��ÿ�3�7ÿ 8ÿ46�ÿ���4�3�ÿ
6��3�ÿ 8ÿ��36��3ÿ��76�ÿ5 ÿ
�����7ÿ6�ÿ�7�5 763ÿ�73��67ÿ
�7�7�ÿ
&amp;�7�7ÿ5��6ÿ7ÿÿ 3 �7ÿ76�77ÿ
7�����4�ÿ6���4�5#�ÿ7���54�ÿ
77�6��ÿ��437ÿ54454P4�ÿ7���7ÿ
45��6�ÿ6�ÿ6�7ÿ����3��ÿ 8ÿ
����4�ÿ5 ��76�ÿK�55�4�7�ÿ� ÿ
�7�7���ÿ���ÿ�6�7�ÿ��55�4�7�ÿF
3��33ÿ 8ÿ�����ÿ6�7ÿQ 4678ÿ
?667�) �7ÿ487��4�ÿ576��8�ÿ6�ÿ
7���7ÿ����7�ÿ 3 �7ÿ4ÿ577� �ÿ
6�7ÿ778�ÿ��ÿ7�%���8ÿ�7�4876��ÿ
�7�� 3ÿ�7�4876�ÿ 8ÿ�7�� 3ÿ
�763��ÿK�7��3ÿ�6�8ÿ��ÿ6�7ÿ4���7�ÿ
4�ÿ ÿ45���6 6ÿ�67�ÿ���ÿ6�7ÿÿ'433�7ÿ
��ÿ(5�4�7ÿ6�ÿ7�4ÿ6�7ÿ����7���ÿÿ
ÿ

�ÿ

3456ÿ89 ÿ5 �� 9���ÿ��ÿ��9�ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

AB2C395ÿDEÿ1234526ÿF9:G45H9:ÿ
345ÿ789 8ÿ5� �5ÿ�7ÿ87�ÿ
�7��7�ÿ945ÿ��8�5ÿ��ÿ����5ÿ
85ÿ8��9ÿ7�89�45�ÿ��ÿ8ÿ
���� 7�9�ÿ��ÿ�9ÿ��5�ÿ9��5�7�ÿ
�75�ÿ��5ÿ8ÿ��5ÿ��ÿ����ÿ�895ÿ
��798�5�ÿ87�ÿÿ8ÿ789 8ÿ858ÿ�7��5ÿ
945ÿ��8�5ÿ���9ÿ59ÿ�9ÿ8�89ÿ���ÿ
�945ÿ���� 7��5�ÿ87�ÿ8�9ÿ8ÿ945ÿ
��7�8��7ÿ9�ÿ����5 ÿ!8�9�ÿ��ÿ
��5"ÿÿ#�94ÿ5��579ÿ87�ÿ���9� ÿÿ
98$5ÿ8��8798�5ÿ��ÿ945ÿ���5ÿ87�5ÿ��ÿ
5�58��7ÿ����97��5ÿ8�8�8�5ÿ
�7ÿ945ÿ��59�ÿ8$5�ÿ87�ÿ958� ÿ
��94�7ÿ87�ÿ �7��7�ÿ945ÿ��8�5"ÿ
%���ÿ�7�9ÿ���ÿ945ÿ&amp;'()ÿ*895ÿ
%87ÿ��895ÿ���5 ÿ4��5�ÿ8ÿ
�987�8ÿ��757 ÿ�7ÿ�55��7�ÿ
87�ÿ57487��7�ÿ����5 ÿ789 8ÿ
5� �5�ÿ �5�ÿ5��7�579ÿ87�ÿ
����ÿ�� �ÿ�8����879ÿ
��5�45��7��ÿ8�55�ÿ9489ÿ945ÿ
��8�5 ÿ789 8ÿ5� �5�ÿ
���8��ÿ�9ÿ�58�4ÿ87�ÿ�895��79�ÿ
85ÿ87ÿ����9879ÿ���� 7�9�ÿ8 59ÿ
9489ÿ4� �ÿ�5ÿ��95�95��ÿ
�8�798�75��ÿ87�ÿ57487�5�"ÿÿ
3�ÿ57 5ÿ945ÿ��7�75�ÿ87�ÿ
57487�5�ÿ!8�9�ÿ��ÿ9455ÿ
5� �5�ÿ�9ÿ��ÿ�5ÿ����9879ÿ9�ÿ
�887�5ÿ���� 7�9�ÿ�5�5���579ÿ
755�ÿ��94ÿ57���7�5798ÿ
��7��58��7"ÿ345ÿ�575,9ÿ��ÿ �4ÿ
8ÿ�887�5ÿ85ÿ�7�58�7��ÿ�5�7�ÿ
!87�,5�ÿ�7ÿ5��7�����ÿ����ÿ
8�59��ÿ45894�ÿ87�ÿ���8ÿ�58 5"ÿ
�7���7�5798ÿ!8�9�ÿ87�ÿ
��95���7ÿ�87ÿ57487�5ÿ5��7����ÿ
�5�5���579ÿ5-�9"ÿ�75��ÿ

IJKLÿNOÿPQKKRJSTÿUKVWÿXYSKZÿOWN[ÿ\]Kÿ^[RJWKÿUQY_ÿ

5.��57��ÿ5��5ÿ945ÿÿ��9ÿ��ÿ
����9ÿ87�ÿ5���5�ÿ�4�5ÿ945ÿ
�55�8��7ÿ��ÿ!8�9�ÿ789 8ÿ
�589 5ÿ�7�585ÿ945ÿ�8 5ÿ��ÿ
�5�5��5�ÿ���5�5ÿ87�ÿ8�9ÿ8ÿ8ÿ
�8�ÿ��ÿ75�ÿ5��579ÿ87�ÿ���9� "ÿ
/7��ÿ5�57ÿ��5ÿ�7�8�5798��ÿ
�877�7�ÿ5-�9ÿ� 9ÿ��ÿ945�ÿ
789 5ÿ��7��5ÿ945ÿ57���7�579ÿ
��7ÿ�4��4ÿ945�ÿ85ÿ�85�"ÿ34�ÿ
�48�95ÿ�����5ÿ87ÿ��5��5�ÿ��ÿ
����5 ÿ789 8ÿ�589 5�ÿ9�ÿ
�����5ÿ��79509ÿ��ÿ�877�7�ÿ87�ÿ
�9 5ÿ�5�5���579"ÿ

1234526ÿ8923459:ÿ

����5ÿ�9ÿ�7ÿ8ÿ�8ÿ�85�ÿ9489ÿ
�959ÿ�79�ÿ&lt;�94ÿ#8ÿ=8$5ÿ87�ÿ
01ÿ

=8$5ÿ*��4��87"ÿ3��ÿ8�5ÿ87�ÿ
�75ÿ�95� ÿ�8�$59ÿ945ÿ�85�ÿ�7ÿ
945ÿ7�94ÿ87�ÿ�94"ÿ345ÿ87��ÿ
��ÿ�7ÿ87�ÿ8�7�ÿ945ÿ�5�5��5�ÿ
����7ÿ��ÿ945ÿ��8�5ÿ�55ÿ���5�ÿ
8ÿ945ÿ87��579ÿ8$5ÿ4�5ÿ95 8�5ÿ
87�ÿ�7ÿ8ÿ�8��8ÿ�9�84ÿ�8�7"ÿ345ÿ
4��ÿ95 8�7ÿ9�ÿ945ÿ�94ÿ87�ÿ
�94589ÿ85ÿ�8��8ÿ57�ÿ��8�75"ÿ
&gt;7�5ÿ&lt;�94ÿ#8ÿ=8$5ÿ�8ÿ8ÿ�89ÿ��ÿ
945ÿ87��579ÿ=8$5ÿ*��4��87"ÿ
?��5�5�ÿ8ÿ945ÿ87�ÿ�75ÿ�5�87ÿ
4�@�7��ÿ945ÿ���5ÿ�8ÿ�9ÿ�-ÿ���ÿ
=8$5ÿ*��4��87ÿ��ÿ945ÿ87�ÿ�5���9"ÿ
&gt;7�ÿ8ÿ�8ÿ�959ÿ��775�9ÿ945ÿ
9��ÿ8$5"ÿ
/ÿ����7ÿ��ÿ945ÿ�75ÿ858ÿ85ÿ

�ÿ

.

]^_àbÿdbefghiejbÿkf̀gl̀emÿ

34546ÿ89533 6ÿ53ÿ��859ÿ�5�ÿ
���6ÿ��653�ÿ5�ÿ53ÿ3�8�ÿ5��ÿ
6�69���6�4ÿ�ÿ4�3ÿ5�65ÿ��34ÿ�6ÿ
�ÿ8���95�86ÿ�4�ÿ4�6ÿ����3��3ÿ
��ÿ4�6ÿ34546ÿ3454�46ÿ5�ÿ�686�6ÿ
34546ÿ5�����59ÿ�ÿ5 ���ÿ4�ÿ9�859ÿ
95�ÿ�36ÿ5�ÿ����ÿ5�����593!ÿÿ

#$%&amp;ÿ()%*+ÿ,ÿ-./0ÿ1.+2ÿ
345+.5%ÿ64*$+ÿ

�466�ÿ39��63ÿ5�ÿ�9�83�ÿ��63�ÿ5�ÿ
35��ÿ�658�63ÿ5�6ÿ��5�8�ÿ6�6�9
8�5� �ÿ6������6�43ÿ4�54ÿ��34ÿ
�645�ÿ4�6�ÿ��5�8ÿ�654��63ÿ�ÿ
��6�ÿ4�ÿ���8���ÿ����6�9�ÿ�4��ÿ
4�6ÿ68�3�346�!ÿ:���ÿ4�6ÿ
�6�3�68��6ÿ��ÿ4�6ÿ��94ÿ
6������6�4�ÿ4�6ÿ��5�8ÿ�54��6ÿ
��ÿ��63ÿ5�ÿ8�53459ÿ5�653ÿ�5;6ÿ
4�6�ÿ��9�6�5�96ÿ4�ÿ�5�5�3ÿ9;6ÿ
6��3��ÿ4�54ÿ85�ÿ85�36ÿ5�56ÿ4�ÿ
���5�ÿ9�6ÿ5�ÿ����6�4�!ÿ�3ÿ3�8��ÿ
��5 96ÿ35�ÿ��63ÿ5�ÿ� �9�3;ÿ
6��3��ÿ5�653ÿ5�6ÿ�6�9546ÿ��ÿ34546ÿ
95�ÿ8��4��99�ÿ6�69���6�4ÿ�ÿ
4�636ÿ5�653!ÿ&lt;�6ÿ�4546ÿ��ÿ= 8� 5�ÿ
�6�95463ÿ95�ÿ�4��ÿ&gt;8��859ÿ35�ÿ
��6ÿ5�653?ÿ��ÿ4�6ÿ34546!ÿA���6ÿ3ÿ
���6ÿ4�ÿ����45�4ÿ5�ÿ��5 96ÿ��6ÿ
3�346�3ÿ4�54ÿ5�6ÿ�6�9546ÿ��ÿ4�6ÿ
�4546!ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ�88�� �ÿ4�ÿ4�6ÿ�BC�ÿ8��859ÿ��6ÿ

5�653ÿ���46846ÿ��ÿD5�4ÿEFEÿ
�6��636�4ÿ4�6ÿ� �634ÿ5�ÿ��34ÿ
3�68458�95�ÿ��63ÿ6G46� �ÿ59��ÿ
��8�ÿ��ÿH5;6ÿ= 8� 5�I3ÿ3���69�6ÿ
5�ÿ4�6ÿ3���63ÿ��ÿH5;6ÿ���6����ÿ
4�459�ÿ5���4ÿJK�KKKÿ58�63ÿ�ÿ3�6!ÿÿ
&lt;�6ÿ�4546ÿ��ÿ= 8� 5�ÿ�53ÿ����ÿ
4�54ÿ8��859ÿ��6ÿ5�653ÿ��ÿ4�6ÿ34546ÿ
5�6ÿ5ÿ��L�6�ÿ��6�95865�96�ÿ5�ÿ
��5 96ÿ�63���86ÿ4�54ÿ���� 6ÿ
3 � 85�4ÿ�68�65���59�ÿ68����8�ÿ
386�� 8�ÿ6�9� 859�ÿ386�8�ÿ
��45�859�ÿ6�85���59�ÿ5�8�94��59�ÿ
5�ÿ68�9� 859ÿ�6�643ÿ4�ÿ4�6ÿ
�6��96ÿ��ÿ= 8� 5�!ÿ�3ÿ3�8��ÿ
5946�5���ÿ��ÿ�36ÿ��ÿ8��859ÿ��6ÿ
5�653ÿ3�599ÿ�88��ÿ��9�ÿ��6�ÿ4�6ÿ
���468���ÿ��ÿ4�6ÿ6������6�4ÿ5�ÿ
4�6ÿ68�9��ÿ3ÿ533��6!ÿ
&lt;�6ÿ�BCÿ6�63ÿ� �ÿ�3;ÿ6��3��ÿ
5�653ÿ53ÿ4�6ÿ3���695�3ÿ��ÿ4�6ÿ
M�654ÿH5;63ÿ5�ÿ8���68��ÿ�546�3ÿ
��6�6ÿ6��3��ÿ�53ÿ�66�ÿ�88����ÿ
54ÿ5ÿ9��946��ÿ5�6�56ÿ�546ÿ��ÿ��6ÿ
���4ÿ��ÿ���6ÿ�6�ÿ�65�!ÿ&lt;�6ÿ6��3��ÿ
85�ÿ�6ÿ85�36ÿ����ÿ��6ÿ��ÿ36�6�59ÿ
�584��3!ÿN �ÿ�546�ÿ96�693�ÿ34���3�ÿ
���ÿ����ÿ�546�ÿ366�56�ÿ
3���586ÿ�546�ÿ����8�ÿ5�ÿ���34ÿ5�6ÿ
����45�4ÿ�584��3ÿ85�3�ÿ6��3��!ÿ
&lt;�6ÿ� �ÿ�3;ÿ6��3��ÿ5�65ÿ
�6�95���3ÿ6345�93�ÿ�6L��6ÿ
364�58;ÿ345�863ÿ4�ÿ���4684ÿ�6�ÿ
01ÿ

34��84��63ÿ����ÿ6��3��ÿ���ÿ5ÿ�6��ÿ
��ÿEKÿ4�ÿOKÿ�65�3�ÿ6�6� �ÿ��ÿ4�6ÿ
3�6�ÿ����6�ÿ��ÿ9��ÿ��43ÿ5�ÿ
4��6ÿ��ÿ8��34��8���!ÿP4�6�ÿ364�58;ÿ
�6L��6�6�43ÿ5�6ÿ5��985�96ÿ���ÿ
���6ÿ�634��5���3ÿ5�ÿ5 ���3ÿ4�ÿ
6G3��ÿ34��84��63!ÿÿ���ÿ�6�3��ÿ��ÿ
9�859ÿ��6���6�4ÿ56�8�ÿ�����3�ÿ
4�ÿ6�684�ÿ�34599�ÿ���6�ÿ��ÿ6�95�6ÿ5ÿ
�6��5�6�4ÿ34��84��6ÿ��ÿ5ÿ�5�869ÿ
��34ÿ��45�ÿ5ÿ�6��4ÿ����ÿ4�ÿ4�6ÿ
8���6�86�6�4ÿ��ÿ8��34��8���!ÿ

Q*RS$%&amp;+ÿ

�88�� �ÿ4�ÿ4�6ÿB5���59ÿT6495�3ÿ
U��6�4���ÿVBTUW�ÿ4�6�6ÿ5�6ÿ
5����G�5469�ÿ��6�ÿX�FKKÿ58�63ÿ��ÿ
�6495�3ÿ5�ÿ�6495�ÿ8�� ���3ÿ
�4��ÿ4�6ÿY9956ÿ9�43�ÿ9�8546ÿ
��349�ÿ��ÿ4�6ÿ653493 6�ÿ4�����ÿ
���6�5ÿC��ÿ5�ÿ���4�ÿZ5�ÿH5;6ÿ
V366ÿ6G3��ÿ5�ÿ��4��6ÿ95�ÿ�36ÿ
�5�3ÿ�ÿ�5�46�ÿFW!ÿT6495�3ÿ5�6ÿ
����45�4ÿ�654��63ÿ�ÿ4�6ÿ95�385�6ÿ
4�54ÿ���� 6ÿ���6���3ÿ�6�6859ÿ
36��863ÿ���ÿ�6��96ÿ5�ÿ���ÿ3�ÿ5�ÿ
�99�6!ÿ���6ÿ��ÿ4�636ÿ36��863�ÿ��ÿ
���8���3�ÿ�89�6ÿ���468��ÿ5�ÿ
������ÿ�546�ÿL�594��ÿ���� �ÿ
3�ÿ5�ÿ�99�6ÿ�5�4543�ÿ34���ÿ
[���546�3ÿ5�ÿ�5�45��ÿ
3���586ÿ�546�ÿ[��ÿ���ÿ��ÿ
�6��3!ÿÿH�85���3ÿ��ÿ4�636ÿ
�6495�3ÿ3���9ÿ�6ÿ8��3 6�6ÿ
��6�ÿ�95���ÿ���ÿ6�69���6�4ÿ��ÿ
��6�ÿ3�586ÿ63 �5���3ÿ53ÿ5ÿ�5�ÿ
4�ÿ���4684ÿ�6495�ÿ�63���863!ÿ

#054*S.%*ÿ

&lt;�6ÿY9956ÿ��ÿA���6ÿ3ÿ5ÿ3���69�6ÿ
8�����4��ÿ�4�ÿH5;6ÿ= 8� 5�ÿ53ÿ
43ÿ�6346��ÿ����5��!ÿ&lt;�6ÿY9956ÿ
�53ÿ\!EOÿ�963ÿ��ÿ3���69�6ÿ����456ÿ
59��ÿH5;6ÿ= 8� 5��ÿ5�ÿ\!Fÿ�963ÿ

�ÿ

34ÿ63789ÿ ÿ ��ÿ43�8��ÿ��89ÿ
�7����ÿ�����ÿ������ÿ��ÿ�389ÿ
�3��3���ÿÿ
����ÿ"#�$%&amp;�'(&amp;'��ÿ
*9�ÿ+�����ÿ34ÿ,-���ÿ��ÿ93-�ÿ83ÿ
�7��8���.ÿ��8��3����8�/ÿ����ÿ
��4 �87�87�ÿ���8�0����7/���ÿ89�ÿ
1 �3��ÿ2 �.ÿ����7ÿ
33������4ÿ�3�����.ÿ�/ÿ+�����
53���/ÿ� ��ÿ�/ÿ�87�ÿ�������ÿ
6898ÿ�3��/�ÿ�-�38�8ÿ��3�3-��ÿ
�/ÿ����3�-��8�ÿ����78��ÿ
8���ÿ��4 �87�87�ÿ�3��/��ÿÿ
� ��84ÿ34ÿ�3--7��84ÿ����78��ÿ
��7��ÿ����� 4ÿ�����ÿ����ÿ8 ���ÿ
�/ÿ�87 �ÿ��ÿ�ÿ39��ÿ����ÿ�ÿ
-3�ÿ��7�/ÿ-������ÿ�4ÿ���/��8�ÿ
89�ÿ����ÿ�3�4ÿ�37���ÿ3ÿ���--���ÿ
�33��.ÿ����ÿ��4 �87�87�ÿ��ÿ
������ÿ89�ÿ��7�ÿ34ÿ�� �4ÿ
�3��84.ÿ��89ÿ�3 ���3�/���ÿ
�������ÿ��ÿ8:ÿ����7���ÿ
;789�.ÿ�3���737�ÿ�4�8�-�ÿ34ÿ
43��8�.ÿ��8��/�.ÿ�/ÿ389�ÿ3���ÿ
��ÿ�/7��ÿ89�ÿ���ÿ34ÿ&lt;33/���ÿ�4ÿ
�3�83�����ÿ�83-ÿ� 8�ÿ7�3=ÿ�/ÿ
�3��/�ÿ�38���3�ÿ43-ÿ�83-ÿ
/- ��ÿ�/ÿ�3��3�ÿ��ÿ�3�8�ÿ
���ÿÿ8���ÿ��4 �87�87�ÿ�4�8�-�ÿ
��3ÿ�3��/�ÿ����7���ÿ���/��4�ÿ
9��88ÿ�/ÿ43�8�ÿ��3�3����ÿ
ÿÿ

/�����84�ÿÿ
1 87 �ÿ4�87��ÿ�3��/�ÿ
�����7��8�4ÿ-3�ÿ����78�ÿ�4ÿ89�4ÿ
�ÿ- ��8���/ÿ��ÿ���ÿ7��8�.ÿ�7�9ÿ
�ÿÿ�3-���:ÿ�4�8�-ÿ34ÿ�33/��/�.ÿ
��8��/�.ÿ����.ÿ�/ÿ�8�-��ÿ
��.ÿ�3����8�/ÿ�4�8�-�039��ÿ
�4� �/ÿ83ÿ�ÿ����ÿ��4 �87�87�ÿ
�4�8�-�0 �ÿ-3�ÿ�7�����47�ÿ8ÿ
- ��8�����ÿ��3�3����ÿ/�����84ÿ�/ÿ
��8���84�ÿÿ

�-389�ÿ89�ÿ9��88ÿ898ÿD7��ÿ
3����-�ÿ���/ÿ83ÿ�7����ÿ�/ÿ
��3/7���ÿÿ6�/�-��8ÿ�/ÿ��/ÿ
��8�ÿ37ÿ�74��ÿ� 8��ÿ8937�9ÿ
�83-� 8�ÿ� 4���ÿ��89ÿ�8ÿ
�78���8�ÿ�/ÿ- �4ÿ389�ÿ43-�ÿ34ÿ
�3��7�3�ÿ�7�9ÿ�ÿ��8.ÿ3��.ÿ�/ÿ��5
4��P��ÿÿÿÿ
ÿQ9��ÿ��ÿ�/ÿ��3�4��ÿ9�8ÿ89�ÿ
�37�/.ÿ89�4ÿ�87 ��4ÿ7�8 8�ÿ
8937�9ÿ89�ÿ� 89ÿ�/ÿ��9 ��ÿ89�ÿ
�37�/� 8��ÿR3����.ÿ���/.ÿ3ÿ
�-����37�.ÿ�74���.ÿ�����8ÿ89�ÿ
7�8 �3�ÿ34ÿ��ÿ3ÿ��3�ÿ��83ÿ89�ÿ
�37�/�ÿ*9��ÿ������8�3�ÿÿ���8�/ÿ
,���3�-��8�ÿD7��84ÿ� �ÿ
&lt;3��ÿ3��ÿ89�ÿ�37�/.ÿ�������ÿ7�ÿ
�/���7�/ÿ�ÿ�ÿ�-�38�8ÿ
����.ÿ�9�-����.ÿ/�8.ÿ�/ÿ389�ÿ
�3--7��84ÿ��3�84�ÿ3��ÿ3���ÿ��ÿ /
�3��78�8��ÿS7�3=ÿ89��ÿ&lt;3��ÿ��83ÿÿ
��������ÿ�/ÿ��9�����ÿ
�83-ÿ����ÿ�4�8�-ÿ3ÿ/���8�4ÿ��83ÿ
����3�-��8�ÿD7��84ÿ����7/�ÿ
ÿ���.ÿ�8�-.ÿ���.ÿ3ÿ��8��/.ÿ
�=38�ÿ83ÿ//���ÿ�83-ÿ� 8�ÿ
��ÿ�8ÿ��ÿ/���9 ��/.ÿ7�8�8�/.ÿ
7�3=ÿ�/ÿ83ÿ����878�ÿ-��7��ÿ �9
��83ÿ89�ÿ� 8�ÿ��ÿ7��ÿ43ÿ
898ÿ��/ÿ83ÿ��8�ÿ�3�8�ÿ
��������4ÿ�/ÿ�38���3�ÿ34ÿ�:�����ÿ ���--���.ÿ7�9���.ÿ�/ÿ/�������ÿÿ
S�/7����ÿ�-����37�ÿ�74���ÿ��ÿÿ
��8��/��ÿ
��84ÿ�3��/��ÿ�����7��8ÿ
E&amp;A�FÿG$&amp;��ÿH' AIÿ$Jÿ ��3�--7
��78�ÿ83ÿ� 8�ÿD7��84�ÿS3/�ÿ3ÿ
� ����ÿ�38�ÿ- ��ÿ7�ÿ89�ÿ- O3�84ÿ
"F@��KBA'%ÿE'�#$(�ÿ
34ÿÿ�3--7��84T�ÿ�-����37�ÿ
LAK��$M�ÿ
�74��ÿ�3�� ���ÿU�ÿ-3�8ÿ
6�/�-��8ÿ6ÿ����7/���ÿ��/ÿ6ÿ��ÿÿ �3--7�����.ÿ3/ÿ/�����ÿ��ÿ
- O3ÿ�74��ÿ� 8�ÿ�3��78�8ÿ898ÿ �����7��8�4ÿ��&lt;7����/ÿ�4ÿ89�ÿ
� �9��ÿ43-ÿ3/�.ÿ� ����ÿ�38�.ÿ �37�84ÿ3/ÿ�3--����3��ÿ�/ÿ�3��ÿ
�/ÿ/���� 4��ÿ6�/�-��8ÿ�/ÿ��/ÿ

"%%'�%ÿ&gt;ÿ
?@@A�&amp;' BC�%ÿ

*9�ÿ8 �/ÿ+���3�Vÿ87�/���ÿ2��������ÿ43ÿ1 87 �ÿS��37���ÿÿ
ÿ

Wÿ 238��8ÿ�/ÿ������ÿ89�ÿ� 8�ÿ��37���.ÿ43��8�.ÿ�87 �ÿ��.ÿ�/ÿ������ÿ��784ÿ34ÿ89�ÿ���3�ÿ
Wÿ 238��8ÿ37ÿ� 8�ÿD7��84ÿ
Wÿ 2�����ÿ89�ÿ������ÿ��784ÿ34ÿ89�ÿ���3�ÿ
Wÿ 3�8�ÿ� 4�ÿ83ÿ��3�ÿ�/ÿ���37 ��ÿ�����ÿ83ÿ�87�ÿ
Wÿ �ÿÿ�33/ÿ�8�� /ÿ34ÿ37ÿ43��8ÿ��37���ÿ
01ÿ

�ÿÿ

ÿ

4567869ÿ 79���ÿ�ÿ�����7ÿ���7ÿ

ÿ

�����ÿ!!�"ÿ#�ÿ$#%�"��&amp;ÿ�'()��ÿ(�$ÿ�#*��+ÿ,"-�$ÿ./ÿ#�&amp;�"(!0 �ÿ1#&amp;'ÿ&amp;'�ÿ21ÿ,ÿ(#"+ÿ1(&amp;�"+ÿ1#�$+ÿ�(�$+ÿ1(3��+ÿ
3�4�&amp;(0 �ÿ(�$ÿ#!�5ÿ6'�/ÿ("�ÿ��.7�!&amp;ÿ&amp;ÿ��#8��ÿ'(*("$�ÿ"�9(&amp;�$ÿ&amp;ÿ&amp;'�ÿ)&amp;��0(9ÿ,"ÿ&amp;'�ÿ- 3�-��&amp;ÿ,ÿ�(�$ÿ(�$ÿ
��.��8���&amp;ÿ�"�#�+ÿ1'#!'ÿ!(�ÿ"���9&amp;ÿ#�ÿ&amp;'�ÿ9��ÿ,ÿ)")�"&amp;/ÿ"ÿ��!���#&amp;(&amp;�ÿ&amp;'�ÿ"�9!(0 �ÿ,ÿ'-��ÿ(�ÿ�(�$ÿ"ÿ�#9ÿ#�ÿ
9�&amp;ÿ3�"ÿ0-�5ÿ:($1(/�ÿ(9�4ÿ&amp;'�ÿ�'"�9#��ÿ-(/ÿ�;)�"#��!�ÿ.(�&lt;ÿ�"�#�ÿ1'#!'ÿ!�&amp;"#.�&amp;��ÿ&amp;ÿ!"(!&lt;#�4ÿ(�$ÿ3�"(99ÿ
�&amp;"�!&amp;�"(9ÿ#��&amp;(.#9#&amp;/5ÿ6'�ÿ,��$(0 �ÿ,ÿ(ÿ�&amp;"�!&amp;�"�+ÿ"ÿ��$�"4"��$ÿ�09#&amp;/ÿ)#)��+ÿ#�ÿ(ÿ$���ÿ("�(ÿ-(/ÿ.�!-�ÿ,�99/ÿ
�;)��$ÿ(�$ÿ3�9��"(.9�ÿ&amp;ÿ1�(&amp;'�"+ÿ�;&amp;"�-�ÿ&amp;�-)�"(&amp;�"��+ÿ1(&amp;�"ÿ$(-(4�+ÿ"ÿ&amp;'�"ÿ��"!��ÿ,ÿ"#�&lt;5ÿ=&amp;ÿ&amp;'�ÿ&amp;'�"ÿ��$ÿ,ÿ
&amp;'�ÿ�)�!&amp;"�-+ÿ(!03�ÿ$����ÿ-(/ÿ"���9&amp;ÿ#�ÿ$�)�#0 �+ÿ1#&amp;'ÿ"($�+ÿ)("&lt;#�4ÿ9&amp;�+ÿ$"#3�1(/�+ÿ(�$ÿ�&amp;"�!&amp;�"��ÿ.�!-#�4ÿ
!3�"�$ÿ"ÿ.�"#�$ÿ#�ÿ�(�$5ÿ6'���ÿ)"!�����+ÿ(�$ÿ&amp;'�ÿ9#&lt;�9#' $ÿ,ÿ&amp;'�#"ÿ!!�""��!�+ÿ3("/ÿ$�)��$#�4ÿ�ÿ'1ÿ&amp;'�ÿ$���ÿ
1(�ÿ,"-�$+ÿ(�$ÿ&amp;'�ÿ$#%�"��&amp;ÿ!'("(!&amp;�"#�0!�ÿ,ÿ�(!'ÿ&amp;/)�ÿ,ÿ$���5ÿÿ&gt;�$�"�&amp;(�$#�4ÿ&amp;'�ÿ&amp;/)��ÿ,ÿ$����+ÿ(�$ÿ&amp;'�ÿ'(*("$�ÿ
(��!#(&amp;�$ÿ1#&amp;'ÿ�(!'+ÿ#�ÿ!��&amp;"(9ÿ&amp;ÿ())")"#(&amp;�ÿ)9(��#�4ÿ(�$ÿ$�3�9)-��&amp;5ÿÿ
=!"��ÿ,ÿ3�4�&amp;(&amp;�$+ÿ)�"!'�$+ÿ)("(.9#!ÿ$����ÿ("�ÿ9!(&amp;�$ÿ#�ÿ?-)#"�5ÿÿ6'���ÿ$����ÿ1�"�ÿ,"-�$ÿ./ÿ�&amp;"�4ÿ1#�$�ÿ(�$ÿ
�&amp;"-�ÿ&amp;'(&amp;ÿ!"�(&amp;�$ÿ(ÿ"�)�(&amp;�$ÿ��"#��ÿ,ÿ.91 �&amp;�+ÿ"ÿ�($$9�@�'()�$ÿ"ÿ&gt;@�'()�$ÿ$�)"���#��ÿ#�ÿ(ÿ�&amp;(.#9#*�$ÿ�(�$ÿ$���5ÿ
6'�ÿ"#$4��ÿ,ÿ)("(.9#!ÿ$����ÿ("�ÿ&amp;/)#!(99/ÿ3�4�&amp;(&amp;�$ÿ1#&amp;'ÿ4"(����+ÿ�'"�.�+ÿ(�$ÿ&amp;"���+ÿ1'#9�ÿ&amp;'�ÿ.91 �&amp;�ÿ#�ÿ.�&amp;1���ÿ
&amp;'�ÿ"#$4��ÿ("�ÿ���(99/ÿ3�"/ÿ)��ÿ1#&amp;'ÿ(ÿ,�1ÿ�)("��9/ÿ�!(A�"�$ÿ!9�-)�ÿ,ÿ4"(����+ÿ'�".(!���ÿ)9(�&amp;�+ÿ(�$ÿ�-�0-��ÿ
�'"�.�5ÿB("(.9#!ÿ$����ÿ("�ÿ(- �4ÿ&amp;'�ÿ- �&amp;ÿ!-- �ÿ&amp;/)�ÿ,ÿ$���ÿ�/�&amp;�-ÿ#�ÿ&amp;'�ÿC "&amp;'1��&amp;ÿD#!'#4(�+ÿ(�$ÿD(�#�&amp;��+ÿ
E��*#�+ÿ(�$ÿF��9(�(�ÿG��0��+ÿ,�(&amp;�"�ÿ�-�ÿ#-)"&amp;(�&amp;ÿ)("(.9#!ÿ$����ÿ(9�ÿ&lt;�1�ÿ(�ÿH'#4'ÿ)�"!'�$ÿ)("(.9#!ÿ$����5Iÿ
B�"!'�$ÿ$����ÿ("�ÿ,��$ÿH)�"!'�$Iÿ(&amp;)ÿ.9�%�ÿ&amp;'(&amp;ÿ3("/ÿ#�ÿ'�#4'&amp;ÿ,"-ÿKLÿ&amp;ÿMNLÿ,��&amp;ÿ(.�&amp;ÿ9(&lt;�ÿ9�3�95ÿF1ÿ)�"!'�$ÿ
)("(.9#!ÿ$����ÿ("�ÿ9!(&amp;�$ÿ�ÿ�#&amp;'�"ÿ91@9/#�4ÿ2(&amp;ÿ49(!#(9ÿ9(&lt;�ÿ)9(#��ÿ"ÿ�(�$ÿ.("�5ÿ6'�#"ÿ'#4'�"ÿ�9�3(0 ��ÿ9�(3�ÿ&amp;'�-ÿ
- "�ÿ�;)��$ÿ&amp;ÿ&amp;'�ÿ1#�$+ÿ-�(�#�4ÿ&amp;'�/ÿ!(�ÿ.�ÿ- "�ÿ(!03�ÿ(�$ÿ'(*("$��ÿ&amp;'(�ÿ91ÿ)�"!'�$ÿ)("(.9#!ÿ$����5ÿÿ
O&amp;P�ÿ#-)"&amp;(�&amp;ÿ&amp;ÿ�&amp;�ÿ&amp;'(&amp;ÿ�3��ÿ)("(.9#!ÿ$����ÿ&amp;'(&amp;ÿ())�("ÿ�&amp;(.9�ÿ!(�ÿ.�!-�ÿ���&amp;(.9�+ÿ(�ÿ�(�$ÿ!�0����ÿ&amp;ÿ- 3�ÿ
1#&amp;'#�ÿ&amp;'�-ÿ�ÿ(ÿ"�4�9("ÿ.(�#�5ÿ6'�ÿ��)"�$#!&amp;(.9�ÿ�(&amp;�"�ÿ,ÿ)("(.9#!ÿ$����ÿ-�(��ÿ&amp;'(&amp;ÿ$�3�9)-��&amp;ÿ1#&amp;'#�ÿ&amp;'���ÿ
�/�&amp;�-�ÿ�'�9$ÿ!!�"ÿ1#&amp;'ÿ!(�0 �+ÿ���$ÿ�#&amp;�ÿ)9(��#�4+ÿ(�$ÿ4 $ÿ.�#9$#�4ÿ$��#4�ÿ&amp;'(&amp;ÿ&amp;(&lt;��ÿ(!03�ÿ�(�$ÿ- 3�-��&amp;ÿ
#�&amp;ÿ!��#$�"(0 �5ÿO-)")�"9/ÿ�#&amp;�$ÿ$�3�9)-��&amp;ÿ#�ÿ��)�!#(99/ÿ'(*("$��ÿ#�ÿ'#4'ÿ)�"!'�$ÿ)("(.9#!ÿ$����ÿ$��ÿ&amp;ÿ(!03�ÿ
�(�$ÿ- 3�-��&amp;+ÿ!�)9�$ÿ1#&amp;'ÿ�"�#�+ÿ)("0!�9("9/ÿ$�"#�4ÿ�&amp;"-�ÿ(�$ÿ'#4'ÿ1(&amp;�"ÿ)�"#$�5ÿÿ
=ÿ��-.�"ÿ,ÿ"���"!��ÿ'(3�ÿ.���ÿ$�3�9)�$ÿ1#&amp;'ÿ��))"&amp;ÿ,"-ÿD#!'#4(�P�ÿG(�&amp;(9ÿQ��ÿD(�(4�-��&amp;ÿB"4"(-ÿ&amp;ÿ'�9)ÿ
!--��#0��ÿ(�$ÿ)")�"&amp;/ÿ1��"�ÿ)9(�ÿ)"(!03�9/ÿ,"ÿ&amp;'�ÿ$���ÿ�/�&amp;�-�ÿ#�ÿ&amp;'�#"ÿ!--��#0��5ÿ6'���ÿ"���"!��ÿ(�$ÿ
#�,"-(0 �+ÿ#�!9�$#�4ÿ�9#��ÿ-())#�4ÿ&amp; 9�+ÿ("�ÿ(3(#9(.9�ÿ(&amp;Rÿ
S96���TÿU5�ÿ4567869ÿ 79���ÿ�ÿV5�8WX 78ÿY �WT6�Zÿ[ÿ\�]^55_ÿU5�ÿ̀5�69ÿ\5a��� �87ÿ
1115��&amp;1 "&lt;��"&amp;'1��&amp;5"4b!(�&amp;(9"��#9#��!/ÿ
ÿ

4567869ÿ���7ÿ5UÿY �WT6��7ÿV5�8WX 78ÿ̀5X �ÿS��7�96ÿcd85��ÿY6�eÿ

'A)Rbb-�f5-()�5("!4#�5!-b())�bD()g�"#��b#�$�;5'&amp;-9h())#$i(jjkj$kM(NlmMM.((!jmnl,NMnoLkk!jÿ
ÿ

V5�8WX 78ÿ̀5X �ÿS��7�96ÿ4567869ÿ 79���ÿY6�7ÿc[��\pdÿq�9�ÿY6�ÿr X �eÿ

ÿ

'A)Rbb("!45#�bj'7?s-*ÿÿ
ÿ
` 96�6�ÿV6taÿS96�8ÿp�t6taÿS�5T�6�ÿc`VSpeÿÿ
F��9(�(�ÿG��&amp;/ÿB9(��#�4ÿ��)("&amp;-��&amp;ÿ
0011ÿÿ

�ÿ

234ÿ647839 49ÿ
�������ÿ��3ÿ�4������9�ÿ�ÿ9�4ÿ
� �43ÿ��ÿ783���ÿ78�4�ÿ�3ÿ��3ÿ
�8346ÿ783���ÿ�49�44ÿ6��4349ÿ
�4�ÿ�8ÿ8��ÿ��3�ÿ9�ÿ346��4ÿ9�4ÿ
8 ��9ÿ��ÿ�743���ÿ�3�8�4ÿ�ÿ
9�4ÿ�� ��9�ÿ

!"#$%#&amp;ÿ()$*&amp;*)+,)ÿ

. 7�34/ÿ��898�ÿ34��3�4ÿ834ÿ
� 4ÿ��ÿ�9ÿ�9ÿ8��46ÿ86ÿ
��43��46ÿ34��3�4�ÿ�4��46ÿ��3ÿ
9�4�3ÿ�48�9�ÿ86ÿ9�4ÿ34�3480�ÿ
�77�39��04ÿ9�4�ÿ73��64ÿÿ
1��443�ÿ9�44ÿ83482����6��ÿ
9�4ÿ6�4�ÿ9447ÿ��74�ÿ86ÿ
��34��4ÿ�ÿ. 7�342834ÿ��438��4ÿ
9�ÿ89�38�ÿ6�8943ÿ�4�8�4ÿ��ÿ
�8�9�3ÿ���4ÿ4�934 4ÿ�489�43ÿ449ÿ
86ÿ�4������8�ÿ73��4 4 ÿ3�4ÿ834ÿ
73�4ÿ9�ÿ89�38�ÿ�4 49ÿ86ÿ
43���ÿ�34ÿ9�8ÿ�9�43ÿ8348�ÿ86ÿ
86ÿ�ÿ48���ÿ�78�946ÿ��ÿ
644��7 49ÿ�3ÿ�� 93��0�ÿ9�89ÿ
�8ÿ6�3�79ÿ9�4ÿ89�38�ÿ73��4 ÿ��ÿ
�48��ÿ�3480�ÿ86ÿ347�4�� 49�ÿ
86ÿ8�ÿÿ4�8�43�894ÿ43���ÿ86ÿ
ÿ

�9�43ÿ�84836 ÿÿ
ÿ
5�4ÿ7�9408�ÿ�84836ÿ�ÿ9�44ÿ����6
8��4ÿ8348ÿ8�4ÿ��898�ÿ34���4�4ÿ
8ÿ�7�3989ÿ73��3�9�ÿ5�4ÿ943 ÿ
��898�ÿ34���4�4ÿ34�43ÿ9�ÿ9�4ÿ
8����9�ÿ��ÿ9�44ÿ4 �3� 49ÿ9�ÿ
7����4ÿ�8��8ÿ8:43ÿ�84836��ÿ
449ÿ���4ÿ��898�ÿ9�3 ÿ86ÿ
���6��ÿ;73���ÿ34���4�42
9�3����ÿ80��780 ��ÿ734783��ÿ��3�ÿ
347�6��ÿ9��ÿ86ÿ86870 �ÿ9�ÿ
��8���ÿ��6�0� �ÿ86ÿ34��43��ÿ
387�6��ÿ�3� ÿ�84836��ÿ449ÿ��9�ÿ
��8�ÿ68 8�42�ÿ8ÿ�4�ÿ��&lt;4�04ÿ
��3ÿ�� ��04ÿ9�89ÿ�89ÿ9�ÿ
346��4ÿ9�4ÿ��438����9�ÿ86ÿ3��ÿ
8 ���8946ÿ��9�ÿ��898�ÿ8348 ÿÿ
ÿ
. 7�34/ÿ6�4ÿ834ÿ73�94�946ÿ8ÿ
7839ÿ��ÿ9�4ÿ=80�8�ÿ&gt;83�ÿ?43��4ÿ
86ÿ��ÿ?9894ÿ�3�0�8�ÿ6�4ÿ
�4���80� ÿ@49�ÿ�9ÿ34 8� ÿ
�7�3989ÿ9�ÿ34����44ÿ9�89ÿ9�4ÿ
�9ÿ4�4�04ÿ8773�8��4ÿ9�ÿ
��898�ÿ34���4�4ÿ6�93���94ÿ
347� �����04ÿ�49�44ÿÿ�46438��ÿ
9894�ÿ86ÿ���8�ÿ8�4��4ÿ86ÿ9�4ÿ

K)$%LMN#,O,)PÿQ"RÿSTU#,%ÿV)W)&amp;"UT)+%ÿ

7�����ÿÿ
ÿ
5�4ÿ347� �����04ÿ86ÿ3��4ÿ��ÿ
���8�ÿ86ÿ���9�ÿ��43 49ÿ834ÿ
�4938�ÿ9�ÿ9��ÿ����8��3804ÿ
�38 4��3�ÿA���4ÿ9894ÿ86ÿ�46438�ÿ
8�4��4ÿ�84ÿ� 4ÿ34���89�3�ÿ86ÿ
743 �B �ÿ��93���ÿ���8�ÿ
��43 49ÿ�9ÿ98�4ÿ9�4ÿ�486ÿ�ÿ
7�8 ��ÿ86ÿ�7�4 40 �ÿ
34���4��ÿ7�����4ÿ9�89ÿ834ÿ��9�64ÿ
9�4ÿ7�3�4�ÿ��ÿ9894ÿ86ÿ�46438�ÿ
8�4��4 ÿC���ÿ�ÿ8ÿ�7�3989ÿ
7839ÿ��ÿ9��ÿ�38 4��3��ÿÿ��43��ÿ8ÿ
� �43ÿ��ÿ94���D�4ÿ9�89ÿ�8ÿ
���44ÿ9�4ÿ�78�9ÿ��ÿ
644��7 49ÿ86ÿ�489�43ÿ449ÿ
�ÿ4 �04ÿ89�38�ÿ�489�34 ÿE4�ÿ
8 ��ÿ9��4ÿ94���D�4ÿ�ÿ8ÿ
8773�8��ÿ��� ÿ8ÿ��34��4ÿ
73�94�0�ÿ49�8���ÿ�����ÿ34D��34ÿ
���43ÿ��ÿ89�38���ÿ�3����ÿ
�38 4�ÿ�3���ÿ86ÿ9344ÿ�ÿ��898�ÿ
8348 ÿ5�44ÿ49�8��ÿ�84ÿ�44ÿ
��� ÿ9�ÿ73�94�9ÿ9�4ÿ�48�9�ÿ��ÿ
9348 �ÿ�49�86�ÿ3�43�ÿ�3ÿ�8�4 ÿ
;ÿ�3643ÿ9�ÿ�4ÿ�9ÿ4�4�04�ÿ9�4�ÿ
�9ÿ�4ÿ�83�4ÿ4����ÿFGH6IHHÿ�449Jÿ

X��6�78�9ÿ644��7 49ÿ�3ÿ64��ÿFX;3Jÿ�ÿ8ÿ43�4ÿ��ÿ94���D�4ÿ9�89ÿ88�4ÿ38��8��ÿ9�ÿ�2�93894�ÿ2�943�ÿ9�34�ÿ487�Y
3894�ÿ86ÿ6498�ÿ3���ÿ���43ÿ9�ÿ�9ÿ��3�4ÿA�9�ÿX;3ÿ94���D�4ÿ�ÿ7�8�4�ÿ9�3 �8943ÿ3���ÿ�4�� 4ÿ8ÿ34��3�4ÿ389�43ÿ
9�8ÿ8ÿ�894ÿ73�6��9ÿZ�943 ÿ86ÿ38�ÿ�8334�ÿ�8ÿ�4ÿ����4�946ÿ38�ÿ�8943ÿ��3ÿ�33��80�ÿ�3ÿ8ÿ�38�ÿ�8943ÿ��3ÿ9���49ÿ
�����ÿÿ
ÿX;3ÿ8��ÿ73� �94ÿ9�4ÿ�648ÿ9�89ÿ8��9ÿ8��ÿ4�4 49ÿ��ÿ8ÿ�94ÿ7�8ÿ�8ÿ�4ÿ�46ÿ��3ÿ9�3 �8943ÿ��93��ÿ&gt;83���ÿ��9ÿ�8ÿ
�4ÿ 864ÿ��ÿ743���ÿ�3�8���ÿ 8943�8�ÿ9�89ÿ8���� ÿ9�3 �8943ÿ9�ÿ638�ÿ9�3����ÿ9�4ÿ784 49ÿ86ÿ34��83�4ÿ�3��6Y
�8943ÿ��3�4[ÿ����4ÿ3��:�7ÿ�8ÿ�4ÿ�46ÿ8ÿ7�80 �ÿ8348�ÿ�8���ÿ�7ÿ38��8943ÿ86ÿ346����ÿ3���ÿÿ
ÿ5�44ÿ94���D�4ÿ�:4ÿ��9ÿ�4 ÿ9�ÿ����6ÿ9�8ÿ9386�0�8�ÿ���46ÿ64�� �ÿ73�83���ÿ��ÿ�447��ÿ9�3 �8943ÿ�ÿ9�4ÿ
�3��6ÿ389�43ÿ9�8ÿ����6��ÿ��3893��9�34ÿ�643�3��6ÿ9�ÿ�86�4ÿ�9ÿÿ
ÿÿ

00ÿ

�ÿ

34ÿ67839 ÿ9 76ÿ9�4��ÿ7��ÿ�93ÿ
�ÿ8 �7��3��ÿ64� ���ÿ
�3� ÿ��8437�3ÿ�4����ÿ36����9 ÿ
��6�9�ÿ �9�7�4�ÿ3�73ÿ����3ÿ
�4 ���ÿ39639 ÿ �9� ÿ
���4�� �37�ÿ��8763ÿ373� �3�ÿ
37����ÿ!��9�ÿ8436�4�ÿ�4� "ÿ4ÿ
4� �7�ÿ��3�63ÿ��ÿ ����ÿ7 7 ÿ
7��ÿ644���73ÿ8 ��3ÿ$�3�ÿ �73�ÿ
�9�7�4��ÿ

%&amp;'()*'+ÿ-.+/*+)ÿ

1��7��ÿ86� ÿ7 ÿ8�7�3ÿ4ÿ7���7�ÿ
86� ÿ3�73ÿ7 ÿ�43ÿ�7��ÿ34ÿ7�ÿ
7 7ÿ7��ÿ679 ÿ��7��ÿ� 63ÿ4�ÿ
3�73ÿ7 72ÿ���4�� �3�ÿ�7�3��ÿ4ÿ
64�4���ÿ3ÿ�9�� ÿ4ÿ���7��ÿ
86� ÿ8 �3ÿ7ÿ����467�3ÿ3� 73ÿ
34ÿ3�ÿ��3��3�ÿ4ÿ�7��ÿ8�7�3ÿ7��ÿ
7���7�ÿ64��9��� ÿ7��ÿ3�ÿ
64�3�ÿ��ÿ7��ÿ749��ÿ5�8� �ÿ
6��ÿ8 �3ÿ�7����ÿ3� 73ÿ����ÿ
�93ÿ6 37��ÿ����ÿ844�ÿ���7��ÿ
86� ÿ7 ÿ 86�7���ÿ84��46ÿ7��ÿ
8 �3ÿ3�ÿ� 73 3ÿ��98�4�ÿ34ÿ
3�ÿ64�3��ÿ6� ÿ��6�9�ÿ
798�ÿ844 3��ÿ7�7���3 �ÿ
597�7�ÿ973 ÿ:��4���ÿ3�ÿ;49��ÿ
&lt;4���ÿ7��ÿ=97��7ÿ:9 ��ÿ6� ÿ
86� ÿ7 ÿ49364�8���ÿ�7��ÿ
�7��ÿ86� ÿ7��ÿ7 ÿ����467�3��ÿ
��98���ÿ3�ÿ44�ÿ6�7��ÿ7��ÿ
64�4��ÿ4ÿ87&gt;ÿ:�6���7�ÿ7��ÿ�7��ÿ
���7��ÿ�7&gt; �ÿ��ÿ�7���ÿ86� ÿ��&gt;ÿ
?7��2ÿ? 73��ÿ@4��4�ÿ?96&gt;3�4��ÿ
&lt;7��6ÿ:937��ÿ3�ÿ5� 7��ÿ3�ÿ
?4 �ÿ7��ÿA84B �ÿC�78$ �ÿ7 ÿ
�7����ÿ3 � ��49ÿ��8763ÿ4�ÿ3�ÿ
64�4��ÿ4ÿ4 3�ÿ7 7ÿ7��ÿ48�ÿ
876�ÿ
6�ÿD���7�ÿ4ÿ5�8� ÿ�ÿ�43ÿ34ÿ7ÿ
�9�� ÿ4ÿ84363�ÿ86� ÿ7ÿ9��ÿ
�����ÿ4ÿ3�4 ÿ86� ÿ49��ÿ��ÿ

8 �7�79ÿ@49�3�ÿÿ�ÿ84����ÿ��ÿ
388���Eÿ3�ÿ6�ÿ��3�ÿ86� ÿ7 ÿ
84363�ÿ9�� ÿ� 7�ÿ7��F4ÿ
373ÿ�7$ÿ�9ÿ34ÿ3��ÿ676�3��ÿÿ
A4� ÿ4ÿ3� ÿ86� ÿ��6�9�ÿ3�ÿ
1���7�7ÿ?73ÿG:�4�ÿ4�7��H�ÿ
7�36� 2ÿ6��3�ÿG@��9�ÿ8�36� �H�ÿ
7��ÿ:�6���7�ÿ�4�&gt;�IJ4$ ÿ
G:��9�9ÿ��6���7���H�ÿ
@4� �7�4�ÿ7��ÿ8�7�����ÿ�43ÿ
67�ÿ��6�9�ÿ76�4�ÿ3�73ÿ67�ÿ��8ÿ
8 ��3ÿ4ÿ����73ÿ3�ÿ8 7�ÿ4ÿ
���7��ÿ86� ÿ��ÿ4� ÿ34ÿ
8 �ÿ�43�ÿ��37�ÿ64�3�ÿ
��6 ÿ7��ÿ��4�4��67�ÿ��� �3��ÿ
3�� ���ÿ�93��3ÿ84��9�4�ÿ
3�49��ÿ34�$73 ÿ�7�7�� �3ÿ
�ÿ4�ÿ76�4�ÿ3�73ÿ64��9��� ÿ67�ÿ
37&gt;�ÿ$���ÿ64��9��3�I��ÿ
����7�� ÿ7��ÿ873� ��8ÿ67��ÿ
7��ÿ�7�ÿ� ��ÿ966 9�ÿ��ÿ
7�� ���ÿ���7��ÿ86� ÿ�9 �ÿ
K 3$4&gt;ÿ4ÿ�4�9�3 ÿ7��ÿ
���4�� �37�ÿ4�7���7�4�ÿ��&gt;ÿ
3�ÿK43�$ 3ÿ:�6���7�ÿ1��7��ÿ
A86� ÿK 3$4&gt;ÿ$4&gt;ÿ34ÿ�����ÿ
7��ÿ �4�ÿ���7�� ÿ4�ÿ89���6ÿ
848 3��ÿA ÿ64��4�ÿ���7��ÿ
8�7�3ÿ86� ÿ����4�ÿ��ÿ3�ÿ
D���7�ÿ8�639 �ÿ4�ÿ3�ÿ�E3ÿ87��ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ
ÿ

()**)+ÿ-+./01.2ÿ34/+5ÿ6728120ÿÿ

����ÿ�4��ÿ

35����ÿ��5�ÿ

34567ÿ4�6��ÿ

3���ÿ������674ÿ

�5� �ÿ%44�#��67 ÿ

�5�4�6ÿ���5�ÿ

��� ÿ��5��ÿ

$��5��� �ÿ
01ÿ

34567ÿ9 ÿ3 5 ÿ

&amp;5� ��ÿ'�67 ÿ

�5�ÿ�!���ÿ

"!� ÿ7�5!# ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

RG5,7/.ÿSTÿ3456-78ÿ9:ÿ;-:/ÿUÿD/F1/ÿ9:ÿV65N/ÿ

345ÿ7899 5ÿÿ���8�5ÿ8�ÿ5���5�ÿ
�8�4ÿ�ÿ8���5�8�95ÿ������ÿ��ÿ
��98��ÿÿ�9�5���5�ÿ��5���ÿ
�5���9ÿ85��ÿ��ÿ8���!ÿ�45ÿ
7899 5"�ÿ�8�4ÿ48���8�9ÿ45�8� 5!ÿ��ÿ
8��ÿ�� 99ÿ�8#5ÿ�5ÿ�4���5�8����ÿ�4�ÿ
�5ÿ�45�8�45�ÿ��ÿ��4ÿ�5�8�5���ÿ��ÿ
8�8����ÿ345�5ÿ��5��ÿ��5�5ÿ
���8�5"�ÿ��8��5ÿ�5��5ÿÿ�9�5ÿ��ÿ
� �ÿ ��ÿ�45ÿ���� �ÿ�ÿ
�4�4$�9!ÿ�599����8�5�5�ÿ
5���8�ÿ8�5���5���ÿÿÿ
��4��8�ÿ�5��5ÿÿ�9�5!ÿ��5��ÿ
��ÿ��� ��ÿÿ��8�5ÿ8�5����!ÿ
����8�!ÿ��ÿ9�9ÿ8�8�898��ÿ�5ÿ
&amp;5�ÿ595�5���ÿÿ�9�5� &amp;8�!ÿ�48�4ÿ
��5�ÿ9�9ÿ��5��ÿÿ�ÿ��5�5ÿ'���5ÿ
��ÿ����8��95ÿ�����8�5�!ÿ
8��� 5ÿ�45ÿ��98��ÿÿ985!ÿ��ÿ459�ÿ
�����8�5�ÿ����55�ÿ8�ÿ�45ÿ�5�ÿ
5�����ÿ(9�5� &amp;8�ÿ8� 95�ÿ
� �&amp;8�ÿ�8�4ÿ�45ÿ��5��ÿ�8�48�ÿ�45ÿ
7899 5ÿ�ÿ���ÿ�ÿ' 8��95!ÿ
�����8��ÿ������5�ÿ������8�5�ÿ
�ÿ�5�ÿ5���8�ÿ8�5���5���ÿ)�ÿ
��8� �ÿ�ÿ� &amp;8�ÿ���8�5ÿ�ÿ55�ÿ
�5'5�ÿ�9�5ÿ�ÿ985!ÿ� �&amp;!ÿ��ÿ8�8�!ÿ
5�4��8�ÿ���8�5"�ÿ�5��5ÿÿ�9�5ÿ
��ÿ��98��ÿÿ985ÿ��ÿ��5�5ÿ
������8�5�ÿ �ÿ5���8�ÿ
�559��5��ÿ�4��4ÿ���8��ÿ��ÿ
'��� �ÿÿ&amp;��95�5ÿ� �&amp;5��ÿ
��ÿ����85��ÿÿ

WXYZ[ÿ]^_ÿ̀^abÿ

4�ÿ����8���5�ÿ�ÿ�45ÿ��5� �ÿÿÿ
8��ÿ�8�����ÿ�4���5�ÿ�8�4ÿ��98��ÿÿ
985ÿ��5��ÿ�4�ÿ�5ÿ�59 5�ÿ��ÿ
�5�8�5���ÿ��ÿ8�8����ÿA�5ÿÿ
�4�5ÿ��5��ÿ�4�ÿ� &amp;5ÿ��ÿ���8�5"�ÿ
��8��5ÿ8�5����!ÿ�ÿ8�5��B5�ÿ��ÿ
���98�ÿ8����!ÿ8��9��5Cÿ
ÿ
D+566ÿ79EFÿ57+91,G/./ÿ5FHÿ
6-:/1786/ÿ
345ÿ7899 5ÿÿ���8�5!ÿ�5��8�5ÿ8��ÿ
�� 99ÿ�8#5!ÿ���ÿ�ÿÿ�5������ÿ
5���8�ÿ4��ÿ�ÿ�5�8�5���ÿ8�ÿ��4ÿ
?559��ÿ��ÿ�5�#85ÿ����5��ÿ345ÿ
I95�ÿ?&amp;5ÿ?8����!ÿ�5�8�9ÿ��ÿ
*+,-./01ÿ3456-78ÿ9:ÿ;-:/ÿ 45J�9�54!ÿÿ��5���5ÿ��5���8���5!�ÿ!ÿ���ÿ�&amp;�4�!5ÿ��ÿ��ÿ
�5�8�5�ÿ�5ÿ 89�95ÿ�ÿ��4ÿ�5��
&lt;11/71ÿÿ
����ÿ��ÿ�5��9ÿ�5�8�5���ÿ�4�ÿ
345ÿ7899 5"�ÿ9�� �ÿ8�ÿ�45ÿ
&gt; ��4�5��ÿÿ?�5�ÿ@8�48 �ÿ�58�ÿ 985ÿ�8�48�ÿ�45ÿ7899 5ÿ8��59!ÿ�ÿ�599ÿ
�ÿ8�ÿ�������8�ÿ���9ÿ�5��ÿÿ
01ÿ

K�ÿ�45ÿ��5ÿ��5!ÿ�45ÿ7899 5"�ÿ�� 99ÿ
�8#5ÿ� &amp;5�ÿ �ÿÿ�9�5�&amp;�8�ÿ
�����8��!ÿ��ÿ���8�5ÿ�5�8�5���ÿ
���5�8�5ÿ�45ÿ�85��9�ÿ�� ��45�5ÿ
��ÿ�45�ÿ�4���5�8����ÿÿ�� 99ÿ
���ÿ985�ÿÿ
L/.-75M/ÿ5FHÿG-179.-NÿNG5.5N7/.ÿ
���8�5ÿ4�ÿÿ�8�4ÿ48���8�9ÿ45�8� 5ÿ
�4�ÿ8�ÿ��99ÿ58�5��ÿ8�ÿ8��ÿ4��8�ÿ
���&amp;ÿ��ÿ���5��89ÿ��89�8���ÿKÿ
9�5ÿ�5��5�� 5ÿÿ���8�5"�ÿ
4��8�ÿ���&amp;ÿ� �ÿ��89�ÿ�5 �5ÿ�45ÿ
�8�ÿOP�4ÿ�5�����ÿ��ÿ��99ÿ�5�8��ÿ8��ÿ
48���8�ÿ�4���5��ÿ345ÿQ5�8� 5ÿ
@��5��ÿ��5�5�5�ÿ�45ÿ�����8��"�ÿ
���!ÿ�� 8�5�ÿ�ÿ�����8��ÿ55���ÿ
��ÿ�� ���8�!ÿ��ÿ99��ÿ
����5��ÿ�5�8�5���ÿ�ÿ���5��ÿ�8�4ÿ
�45ÿ7899 5"�ÿ48����!ÿ459�8�ÿ�ÿ��89�ÿ
ÿ����ÿ�5��5ÿÿ�9�5�ÿ

�ÿ

344566ÿ89ÿ545 9 ÿ
���ÿ�������ÿ���ÿ�ÿ������ÿ��ÿ����ÿ
�������ÿ�!��"�#ÿ�$$���#�"��ÿ�#%ÿ
�&amp;�#��'ÿ()$��ÿ*��!�+ÿ���%��ÿ
�!"&amp;�"��+ÿ,��"#�+ÿ()$��ÿ*��-ÿ
����+ÿ�#%ÿ����ÿ#�����ÿ����ÿ�.�!�ÿ
)�#�ÿ&amp;������ÿ��)ÿ,���#%ÿ���ÿ
����#ÿ�#%ÿ���ÿ�����'ÿ/�"�#����0
���#�1!�#�ÿ�!��"�#ÿ�$$���#�"��ÿ
��ÿ�#ÿ�&amp;��ÿ%��!"�#ÿ�����#ÿ�#%ÿ
�����%�ÿ()$��2���ÿ$���#!�ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ3���$�#�ÿ*��ÿ4�#��ÿ/�"�#��ÿ
5�6�����+ÿ5����#��ÿ7�#��&amp;�#!�ÿ
$���&amp;��+ÿ���ÿ8��ÿ9����.�ÿ3����ÿ
:����+ÿ7�����ÿ;�&amp;�ÿ�#%ÿ�ÿ&amp;�����ÿ��ÿ
�.�!"�#�ÿ�#ÿ#��,�ÿ��&amp;���ÿ7���ÿ
�.�!�ÿ��#%�%�ÿ��ÿ������#%�ÿ��ÿ
&amp;������ÿ��ÿ���ÿ���ÿ�##�����'ÿÿ
�������0��#�%ÿ�ÿ)�#���%ÿ
�!��"�#ÿ������ÿ��ÿ�%�#"1�%ÿ�#ÿ
���ÿ�������ÿ;�!��"�#ÿ8��#+ÿ�$%���%ÿ
�&amp;��ÿ1&amp;�ÿ����ÿ��ÿ,�ÿ!�)$���#�ÿ
����ÿ���ÿ9�!����#ÿ4�$��)�#�ÿ��ÿ
/�����ÿ;����!��ÿ�����)�#��ÿ��ÿ
�!��"�#ÿ$��#�'ÿ���ÿ�������ÿ����ÿ
!�#"#��ÿ��ÿ��&amp;�ÿ�#ÿ�$$�&amp;�%+ÿ
�$%���%ÿ�#%ÿ�!"&amp;�ÿ;�!��"�#ÿ8��#ÿ
�#ÿ$��!�ÿ��ÿ�)��#ÿ�����,��ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ
�!��"�#ÿ��#��'ÿÿ
=&gt;55?@AÿB5 ÿCD 56ÿE 9 &gt;ÿ
FG56H95ÿ
3� ��#%�#�ÿ���ÿ�������+ÿ���ÿ
3���$�#�ÿ*��ÿ4�#��ÿ/�"�#��ÿ
5�6�����ÿ���ÿ����,�����%ÿ�#ÿIJKLÿ
,�ÿ�#ÿ�!�ÿ��ÿ7�#����ÿ����ÿ���ÿ���%�ÿ
���ÿ5�6�����ÿ��ÿ$���&amp;�"�#ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ#�����ÿ����!��ÿ�#%ÿ��ÿ$�,��!ÿ
���'ÿ���ÿ)���ÿ$�)�#�#�ÿ�������+ÿ
�#%ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ���!�ÿ���ÿ$�6ÿ��ÿ
#�)�%+ÿ��ÿ���ÿ$�!��%ÿ%�#��ÿ
�,�&amp;�ÿ5�6�ÿ9�!����#'ÿ���ÿ%�#�ÿ
�&amp;����6�ÿ��ÿ���ÿ3���$�#�ÿ*��+ÿ
()$��+ÿ�#%ÿ8��)�%ÿ8��#�ÿ,��-�ÿ��ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ
abcdedfgbÿijbklmdnÿopÿieopkÿqkejjkÿlpÿrsclejÿ

�#����ÿ�#&amp;��#)�#�ÿ%����,��ÿ��ÿ
)�#�ÿ��ÿ�ÿ$��!�ÿ��ÿ��&amp;�ÿ�#%ÿ&amp;����'ÿÿ
����ÿ�#!��%��ÿ�ÿ����ÿ)��#���#�%ÿ
,��!�ÿ�#ÿ5�6�ÿ9�!����#ÿ����ÿ
�.�!��ÿ$��$��ÿ��)ÿ���#%ÿ���ÿ
����#[ÿ�ÿÿ%��#���#+ÿ�)���0���#ÿ
��)��$���+ÿ������!ÿ
#����,����%�+ÿ�� ��#%�#�ÿ#�����ÿ
����!��ÿ�#%ÿ�%\�!�#�ÿ$�]�)���ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ3���$�#�ÿ*��ÿ4�#��ÿ/�"�#��ÿ
5�6�����'ÿ
F94 9 ÿ
���ÿ���+ÿ�!�#�!ÿ��^#�ÿ����ÿ
�� ��#%�ÿ()$��ÿ��ÿ�#��$��,��ÿ
��)ÿ���ÿ�)���ÿ�#%ÿ���������'ÿ
P!!�%�#�ÿ��ÿ���ÿ5�#%ÿ8���!�ÿ
T#�"����+ÿ���ÿ����ÿ��!���%ÿ��#�ÿ
%����#!��ÿ��)ÿ����ÿ)���$�����#ÿ
����ÿ��&amp;�ÿ�)$���#�ÿ�!�#�)�!ÿ
,�#�1��ÿ����ÿ����ÿ��)ÿ�����ÿ��#�ÿ
%����#!��+ÿ�#!��%�#�ÿ���ÿ�$$���#���ÿ
��ÿ)�6��ÿ�#������ÿ���ÿ������+ÿ
U66D56ÿ Vÿ
��!�ÿ��ÿ�!��"�#+ÿ��!��ÿ���%�ÿ�#%ÿ
���"&amp;���+ÿ�!�#�!ÿ&amp;����ÿ�#%ÿ����ÿ
W??98D @56ÿ
���ÿ$��!�)�6�#�ÿ$����,���"��'ÿÿP�ÿ
X9YYD @8ZÿUY A5ÿ
���ÿ��)�ÿ")�+ÿ��ÿ!�#ÿ!����ÿ
()$��ÿ���ÿ��)�#%���ÿ$��!�0,���%ÿ �!�#�)�!ÿ!�����#���+ÿ�#!��%�#�ÿ
�#%ÿ�������ÿ��ÿ����ÿ������ÿ����ÿ!����ÿ %�_!��"��ÿ�#ÿ�!!����#�ÿ�%�!�"�#��ÿ
�ÿ�)$���)�#�ÿ�$$���#�"��'ÿÿ

�,���ÿMLLÿ����ÿ�,�&amp;�ÿ5�6�ÿ
9�!����#'ÿ�����ÿ�#����ÿ�������ÿ
�.�!�ÿ�&amp;�ÿI'Kÿ)�����#ÿ&amp;������ÿ
�##�����ÿ��ÿ���ÿ����#+ÿ�ÿ#�),�ÿ
����ÿ���ÿ���#ÿ���#�1!�#���ÿ��#!�ÿ
NLII+ÿ���#ÿ3���$�#�ÿ*��ÿ4�#��ÿ
���ÿ&amp;���%ÿ��ÿ���ÿO9���ÿ*���"���ÿ
8��!�ÿ�#ÿP)��!�Qÿ�#ÿS��%ÿ9�#�#�+ÿ
P)��!�'ÿ
:�ÿ)�#�ÿ&amp;������+ÿ����ÿ1��ÿ���$ÿ�#ÿ
����ÿ&amp;����ÿ��ÿ���ÿ/�"�#��ÿ5�6�����ÿ
��ÿ���ÿ�������ÿ��ÿ()$��+ÿ���!�ÿ
$�&amp;�%��ÿ��&amp;�!��ÿ��6�ÿ���+ÿ���%+ÿ�#%ÿ
��%��#�'ÿT��ÿ$�)�#�#�ÿ��!�"�#ÿ�#%ÿ
�)$���#!�ÿ��ÿ$�6ÿ&amp;������ÿ)��#�ÿ
����ÿ�#�ÿ)�#���)�#�ÿ�!"&amp;�"��ÿ
�#%���6�#ÿ,�ÿ�����ÿ���ÿ/�"�#��ÿ
8�6ÿ3�&amp;�!�ÿ�ÿ���ÿ�������ÿ��&amp;�ÿ
%��!�ÿ�)$�!��ÿ�#ÿ���ÿ����+ÿ����ÿ
����%ÿ��!���+ÿ�!�#�)�!ÿ�#%ÿ
�!�����!��ÿ�)$�!��'ÿÿÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

Qÿ V6ÿ�64 ÿS8�6� ÿ;O85�84 87&lt;ÿ
Qÿ V�5ÿWÿV 7�8�ÿM8�� ÿ

_àabcdeÿgahiÿjkdalÿmhncodhÿ̀phqalroiaÿsahtukhinailÿcdÿvwbciaÿ

3456789 ÿ4 ÿ�6 �8ÿ�6��ÿ�87�
7����ÿ87�6�8ÿ6�ÿÿ7�7ÿ78�6���ÿ
���8�ÿ���ÿÿ� �����7ÿ�76�8ÿ�7�4ÿ
��8ÿ7�8�ÿ�6��ÿ6�ÿ��8ÿ78�6���ÿ
�7�878ÿ�6��9� ÿÿ�6����ÿ�8�ÿ
��ÿ���ÿ��7�!ÿ�����8ÿ6�ÿ�874 ÿ
��ÿ��8 6��ÿ8�8#�ÿ�7�4ÿ���ÿ
7�7ÿ8$��ÿ��ÿ7�87ÿ
��44��6�8%ÿ&amp;��'ÿ4�78�ÿ
�6���8ÿ87�6��ÿ��ÿ
�88��44����ÿ4 (8ÿ6�ÿ8 687ÿ��7ÿ
786�8��ÿ��ÿ��8 ÿ8������ÿ��ÿ
845��48��ÿ�55�7���6�8ÿ�7�4ÿ��8ÿ
)6 �8%ÿ
+,-./01,2-31.ÿ51..6731./ÿ
��8ÿ5788��8ÿ��ÿ�6 66��ÿ��ÿÿ
��8ÿ�6��� ��ÿ6�8� (�ÿ��ÿ�76ÿ
��84 ÿ�78�8ÿ�7848����ÿ�6666��ÿ
��ÿ��8 ÿ��ÿ��8ÿ)6 �8'ÿ57(�ÿ
78�78����ÿ��ÿ���87ÿ5 �8� 8�ÿ
8�%ÿ��8ÿ)6 �8ÿ6ÿ �ÿ87�8�ÿ�ÿ
��8ÿ9�ÿ:78ÿ�7�5�7����ÿ
:����76��ÿ;9:�:&lt;�ÿ��6��ÿ57��6�8ÿ
#=8��7���8ÿ5� 6�ÿ�7�5�7����ÿ
�6��6�ÿ�7�878ÿ�6��ÿ��ÿ&gt;7��ÿ
�7�878ÿ������%ÿ��8ÿ78�
6���848��ÿ��ÿ��8ÿ9:�:ÿ�)6 �8ÿ
����8���7!ÿ6�8�ÿ��ÿ76��ÿ�66��7ÿ
��ÿ786�8��ÿ��ÿ��ÿ�7�4ÿ�7�878ÿ
�6��ÿ��ÿ?88 ��ÿ������ÿ�6 �8%ÿ
:��6��� ��ÿ8����6��ÿ345678'ÿ
64 �8ÿ ÿÿ�� ( 8ÿ��44��6��!ÿ

����ÿ8����8ÿ58�8�76�ÿ�7ÿ6���8ÿ
�8��ÿ��7ÿ� �87�7���ÿ�7ÿ8��ÿ
�66��7ÿ���ÿ78ÿ�7�86��ÿ6���ÿ��8ÿ
��������ÿ��ÿ���87ÿ57�ÿ��ÿ��8ÿ
��44��6��%ÿÿ
�78���ÿ8����8�ÿ� ( 66��ÿ�7ÿ
6(6��ÿ�55�7���6�8�ÿ��4 6�8�ÿ�6��ÿ
��8ÿ�8ÿ��ÿ�6�����8�ÿ@7���8ÿ
� �#��6��ÿ6���8ÿ��ÿ�85ÿ
58�8�76�ÿ��ÿ4���76�ÿ��6��8ÿ
��7����ÿ���������ÿ����ÿ �ÿ
785788��ÿ�ÿ�55�7���6��ÿ��ÿ�6�ÿ
� 78�8 ÿ��ÿ345678'ÿ@7����ÿ
��ÿ87�8ÿ ÿÿ� � 8ÿ�6�8 ÿ
���%ÿ
A1B.21B.CDEFF-G6ÿH73IE2Jÿ
K�������ÿ8�8��ÿ��8ÿ�78�ÿ
5��8�� ÿ��ÿ�4� �8ÿ8����46�ÿ
���6��9858�6 �ÿ��76��ÿ��8ÿ
�����87ÿ8 ��!LÿM8�� ÿ��ÿ
8�8��ÿ��8ÿ�6��76� �ÿ88�ÿ
645�7���ÿ6�ÿ��8ÿ)6 �8%ÿ�56�6N6��ÿ
��ÿ��88ÿ�7ÿ6467ÿ�7�6���ÿ����ÿ
��ÿ ÿ�7� ÿ��ÿ��8ÿ��������ÿ��ÿ
�85ÿ6�ÿ�8�87���ÿ78�8��8ÿ��7ÿ�� ÿ
�6�8 8%ÿO6����78ÿ��� ÿ8�8��ÿ
6����8Pÿ
Qÿ O���4�68ÿK7�ÿS�8ÿÿ
;T��7�&lt;ÿ
Qÿ :57��ÿM8�� ÿ;U �&lt;ÿ
Qÿ :����7ÿK �ÿ;T��&lt;ÿ
01ÿ

;X���87&lt;ÿ
Qÿ :7� �ÿU 7(8�ÿY �8ÿ
;Z��84 87&lt;ÿ
U ��ÿ��44��6��ÿ���6�8ÿ78ÿ
���8�ÿ��ÿ���7�6��8�ÿ�ÿ����
57�#�ÿ�7��5ÿ6�ÿ345678ÿ���ÿ ÿ��8ÿ
345678ÿ��4 87ÿ��ÿ��4487�8�ÿ��8ÿ
345678ÿ?6��ÿ��ÿ��ÿ��8ÿ345678ÿ
:78ÿ��44��6��ÿ�8��87ÿ;3:��&lt;%ÿ��8ÿ
O���4�68ÿK7�ÿS�8�ÿ��8ÿ
:57��ÿM8�� ÿ��ÿ��8ÿV�5ÿ
��ÿV 7�8�ÿM8�� ÿ78ÿ
���7�6��8�ÿ�ÿ��8ÿ��4 87ÿ��ÿ
��4487�8%ÿÿ��8ÿ345678ÿ?6��ÿ���ÿ
5��(8ÿ78(� �ÿ��ÿ��6�(8�ÿ
�6��87ÿ ÿ�8ÿ ÿÿ�87�ÿ�8ÿ
@8��8�ÿ�����ÿ6�ÿ:����%ÿ3:��ÿ
���7�6��8ÿ:����7ÿK �ÿ��ÿ��8ÿ
:7� �ÿU 7(8�5 �8ÿ���ÿ ��ÿ
4 6��6�ÿ�ÿ8487�8���ÿ����ÿ��ÿ
57��6�8ÿ#���6ÿ 6���8ÿ��ÿ���8ÿ
���ÿ��8ÿ� 8�ÿ��ÿ�7�ÿ�48%ÿÿ
H,2/ÿ-.[ÿ5\F2\,6ÿ
:7�ÿ��ÿ����7ÿ�55�7���6�8ÿ78ÿ
�76�� ÿ8����46�ÿ 8�%ÿ��8ÿ345678ÿ
:7� �ÿU 7(8�5 �8ÿ���ÿ(68�ÿ
��ÿ�8��8�ÿ��7(87%ÿ��88ÿ
�78��8ÿ��7(87ÿ78ÿ�7��ÿ��ÿ
��44��6�8ÿ�6��ÿÿ�7���ÿ8�8ÿ��ÿ
5 �8ÿ�6��ÿÿ��76�6��ÿ7���768��8�ÿ
����78%ÿ?88 ��ÿ������ÿ��ÿ��8ÿ
Z�7���8�ÿU6��6��ÿ78�6��ÿ78ÿ
��48ÿ��ÿÿ7�8ÿ��4 87ÿ��ÿ7��ÿ
��ÿ���87ÿ�6��ÿ�78��8ÿ�8��ÿ���ÿ
��ÿ8ÿ8�87�8�ÿ��ÿ8����8ÿ�6�6�ÿ
8���848���ÿ�78�8ÿÿ��6]�8ÿ
6�8����ÿ�7ÿ7���ÿ��ÿ�55�7�ÿ
��44��6��ÿ64 �8ÿ��ÿ
8��#����ÿ8^�7�%ÿÿ
ÿ

�ÿ

3456748ÿ ���6�ÿ
���ÿ�������ÿ��ÿ�� �!�ÿ�"ÿ#��$ÿ�"ÿ
%&amp;�#&amp;ÿ�"ÿ�ÿ'��$�#�(ÿ)���*&amp;�$(+,ÿ
�ÿ)���*&amp;�$(ÿ$��$ÿ���"ÿ.*"$ÿ�*$"�/�ÿ�ÿ
��.�!ÿ$�*!�"$ÿ�0!�)1�&amp;ÿ��%�ÿ�ÿ
&amp;�1�&amp;��ÿ�!%2ÿ��*!�"�ÿ�"ÿ�&amp;ÿ
�)�&amp;���)ÿ3��&amp;ÿ��!ÿ$��"�ÿ
)���*&amp;�1�"ÿ�&amp;ÿ��&amp;�!��4ÿ�&amp;/ÿ$��ÿ
�� �!�ÿ�!��ÿ�"ÿ&amp;�ÿ�5)�1�&amp;+ÿ�&amp;ÿ
67894ÿ&amp;��!�(ÿ829ÿ������&amp;ÿ�!%ÿ:�"�$�!"ÿ
"�&amp;$ÿ�&amp;ÿ�"1��$�/ÿ;899ÿ������&amp;ÿ�&amp;ÿ
��)��ÿ��$�#�(ÿ!����&amp;"ÿ#����ÿ:�"�1&amp;�ÿ
&lt;����&amp;�ÿ=��!ÿ&gt;*&amp;�"ÿ?�1�&amp;��ÿ
@�%�"��!�2ÿ���"ÿ"�&amp;/�&amp;�ÿ"* �!$�/ÿ
�ÿ$�$��ÿ��ÿ64A67ÿ.�3"4ÿ;BC2Dÿ������&amp;ÿ
�&amp;ÿ��3�!ÿ�&amp;)���4ÿ;868ÿ������&amp;ÿ�&amp;ÿ
:��*�ÿ�//�/4ÿ�&amp;/ÿ;686ÿ������&amp;ÿ�&amp;ÿ
�)�&amp;���)ÿ�*$*$ÿ�&amp;ÿ��)��ÿ��$�#�(ÿ
�)�&amp;����"ÿ"*!!�*&amp;/�&amp;�ÿ&lt;����&amp;�ÿ
=��!ÿ&gt;*&amp;�"ÿ?�1�&amp;��ÿ@�%�"��!�2ÿÿ
��*!�"�ÿ)�&amp;ÿ�� �)$ÿ)���*&amp;�1�"ÿ�&amp;ÿ
��&amp;(ÿ#�("2ÿE���*&amp;�1�"ÿ$��$ÿ
�0!�)$ÿ��!��ÿ&amp;*�3�!"ÿ��ÿ:�"�$�!"ÿ�!�ÿ
�F�&amp;ÿ��!�ÿ/�"�!�3��ÿ��)�"ÿ$�ÿ��:�ÿ
�&amp;/ÿ/�ÿ3*"�&amp;�""2ÿ���"ÿ/�"�!�3���$(ÿ
�F�&amp;ÿ�&amp;)!��"�"ÿ��&amp;/ÿ:��*�"G�ÿ
/�"�!�3��ÿ�H�)$ÿ��!ÿ��&amp;/ÿ�#&amp;�!"4ÿ
�&amp;/ÿ�ÿ/�$�!!�&amp;$ÿ$�ÿ#�!%�!"ÿ�!ÿ
�������"ÿ$��$ÿ�!�ÿ���%�&amp;�ÿ$�ÿ��:�ÿ$�ÿ
$��ÿ)���*&amp;�$(ÿ3*$ÿ�!�ÿ&amp;�ÿ��&amp;��!ÿ
�3��ÿ$�ÿ�H�!/ÿ$�ÿ/�ÿ"�2ÿÿ
I���ÿ:��*��"ÿ��ÿ$�*!�"$ÿ�)1:�$(ÿ)�&amp;ÿ
��:�ÿ�&amp;:�!�&amp;��&amp;$��ÿ�&amp;/ÿ
�&amp;�!�"$!*)$*!�ÿ�� ��)�1�&amp;"4ÿ�"ÿ
#���G�!��ÿ&amp;��"�4ÿÿ$�ÿ#�$�!ÿJ*���$(4ÿ
$�ÿ$!�K)ÿ)�&amp;)�!&amp;"4ÿ�&amp;/ÿ��!�4ÿ���ÿ��ÿ
#��)�ÿ)�&amp;ÿ*�1��$��(ÿ�H�)$ÿ$��ÿ
�&amp;$��!�$(ÿ��ÿ$��ÿ&amp;�$*!��4ÿ)*�$*!��4ÿ
")�&amp;�)4ÿ�&amp;/ÿ!�)!��1�&amp;��ÿ!�"�*!)�"ÿ
$��$ÿ/!�#ÿ����ÿ$�ÿ$��"�ÿ��)�"ÿ$�ÿ
3���&amp;ÿ#�$�2ÿ
L$��!ÿ)���*&amp;�1�"ÿ�!�*&amp;/ÿ$��ÿ

-UVWXVYÿ[\X]V^ÿ_^ÿ̀X_^YÿUYXVVYÿÿ

)�*&amp;$!(ÿ��:�ÿ���%�/ÿ�$ÿ"$!�$����"ÿ$�ÿ
�&amp;"*!�ÿ�ÿ3���&amp;)�ÿ�"ÿ�)���:�/ÿ
3�$#��&amp;ÿ�))����/�1&amp;�ÿ�&amp;/ÿ
)��$���M�&amp;�ÿ�&amp;ÿ$�*!�"�ÿ�)1:�$(4ÿ3*$ÿ
��"�ÿ%���&amp;�ÿ$���!ÿ"����ÿ$�#&amp;N"ÿ
)��!�)$�!ÿ�&amp;/ÿ#�(ÿ��ÿ����ÿ�&amp;$�)$ÿ��!ÿ
$��"�ÿ$��$ÿ��:�ÿ$��!�ÿ(��!O!�*&amp;/2ÿ
�5�� ��"ÿ��ÿ$��ÿ#�(ÿ�� �!�ÿ
3���&amp;)�"ÿ$�*!�"�ÿ#�$�ÿ%���&amp;�ÿ$��ÿ
"����ÿ$�#&amp;ÿ)��!�)$�!ÿ�&amp;)�*/�"ÿ$��ÿ
E���3�!ÿ��ÿE����!)�ÿ�)1:�1�"ÿ
$��$ÿ�5�&amp;/ÿ$��ÿ$!�/�1�&amp;��ÿ$�*!�"$ÿ
"��"�&amp;ÿ3(ÿ�&amp;)!��"�&amp;�ÿ��!%�1&amp;�ÿ��!ÿ
�)1:�1�"ÿ��!ÿ"!�&amp;�4ÿ����ÿ�&amp;/ÿ#�&amp;$�!ÿ
�&amp;/ÿ�H�!�&amp;�ÿ"�!:�)�"ÿ�&amp;/ÿ!��!��ÿ
$�!�*��ÿ��)��ÿ&amp;�&amp;O!�P$"ÿ"*)�ÿ�"ÿ
$��ÿ@��&amp;"ÿE�*3ÿ�&amp;/ÿ�� �!�ÿQ!��ÿ
E���*&amp;�$(ÿE�&amp;$�!2ÿ
��ÿ�//!�""ÿ$�*!�"�ÿ&amp;��/"ÿ�&amp;/ÿ
�� �)$"4ÿ�$N"ÿ�� �!$�&amp;$ÿ��!ÿ$��ÿ
�������4ÿ&amp;����3�!�&amp;�ÿ)���*&amp;�1�"4ÿ
$��ÿ?�1�&amp;��ÿR�!%"ÿ&lt;�!:�)�ÿ�&amp;/ÿ
!���$�/ÿ���&amp;)��"ÿ$�ÿ)����3�!�$�ÿ�&amp;/ÿ
)���*&amp;�)�$�ÿ!��*��!�(ÿ�3�*$ÿ
"��!�/ÿ!��!�1�"2ÿÿÿ
L&amp;�ÿ� !��)�ÿ$�ÿ�� !�:�/ÿ
)��!/�&amp;�1�&amp;ÿ3�$#��&amp;ÿ$��ÿ�������4ÿ
&amp;����3�!�&amp;�ÿ)���*&amp;�1�"4ÿ$��ÿ
?�1�&amp;��ÿR�!%ÿ&lt;�!:�)�4ÿ�&amp;/ÿ!���$�/ÿ
���&amp;)��"ÿ�"ÿ$�ÿ)�&amp;:�&amp;�ÿ/�")*""��&amp;"ÿ
3�$#��&amp;ÿ)���*&amp;�1�"ÿ�&amp;/ÿ���&amp;)��"ÿ
$�!�*��ÿ*3��)ÿ��!*�"ÿ$�ÿ�5��!�ÿ

)����&amp;ÿ)�&amp;)�!&amp;"ÿ�&amp;/ÿ!��!�1�"2ÿ
S�!*�"ÿ)�&amp;ÿ�&amp;)�*/�ÿ�ÿ:�!��$(ÿ��ÿ
� �!$*&amp;�1�"ÿ��!ÿ�&amp;$�!�)1�&amp;ÿ�&amp;/ÿ
�!1)��1�&amp;4ÿ�� ��"�M�&amp;�ÿ)����&amp;ÿ
�����&amp;$"ÿ��ÿ��&amp;ÿ)���*&amp;�)�1�&amp;4ÿ
�&amp;)�*"��&amp;ÿ�&amp;/ÿ)����3�!�1�&amp;2ÿ
���ÿ&lt;����&amp;�ÿ=��!ÿ&gt;*&amp;�"ÿ?�1�&amp;��ÿ
@�%�"��!�ÿ��"ÿ"$�$�/ÿ�ÿ
)����$��&amp;$ÿ$�ÿ#�!%�&amp;�ÿ
)���!�1:��(ÿ#�$�ÿ"*!!�*&amp;/�&amp;�ÿ
�!��"T)���*&amp;�1�"ÿ$�ÿ�&amp;"*!�ÿÿ
$��!�N"ÿ�ÿ��!��&amp;��*"ÿ�&amp;/ÿ
!�/*)1:�ÿ!���1�&amp;"��2ÿÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

45676895ÿ8 5�ÿ6�ÿ����97��ÿ�����ÿ!"ÿ�ÿ��7��ÿ� �67�ÿ�����6��ÿ

ÿ

`Y
ZY

XY

ZY

abcdefgÿiXY
jbkÿiZY
jlmnoleokÿi[Y
pmqorkÿiX\Y
sonlobqemfÿtfuvkqleokÿi]Y
sokqbvlbfqkÿi^_Y
soqberÿiZY
wlbfkdmlqbqemfÿi`Y

[Y

^_Y
]Y

xyzy{|ÿ~{ÿyÿ|ÿyÿ
z|ÿÿÿy|ÿyyÿ

X\Y

ABCDEFGÿIAÿJKLBMKNÿOKDPÿAFDQREFSÿTUVWÿ

����97�ÿ���ÿ��7��ÿ��$�(�6�ÿ07"ÿÿ �ÿ�����6��ÿ%9�9��67ÿ

ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

ÿ

./!0ÿ
./!&lt;ÿ
./!&gt;ÿ
./!?ÿ
./!@ÿ
./!.ÿ
./!!ÿ
./!/ÿ

�'ÿ ��7�ÿ�98(ÿ ��65�97�ÿ�)ÿ4�5�ÿ+6'ÿ ,�-�ÿ %9�9�6�ÿ
$6��ÿ%9�9��ÿ 6����ÿ�&amp;�
67ÿ
��9*�ÿ
+9*��ÿ �7���ÿ
123452163ÿ
123572997ÿÿ
129792377ÿÿ
127;92:81ÿÿ
127:82884ÿÿ
129712938ÿÿ
127:5278:ÿÿ

772654ÿ
7:237;ÿ
652159ÿ
782:46ÿ
6;25;3ÿ
7929;4ÿÿ
782;;;ÿÿ
ÿÿ 782931ÿÿ

1782479ÿ
17127;7ÿ
1662555ÿ
1162417ÿ
;723;3ÿ
1172191ÿÿ
;32475ÿÿ
5:2475ÿÿ

ABCDEFGÿIAÿJKLBMKNÿOKDPÿAFDQREFSÿTUVWÿ

01ÿ

01ÿ

1972::5ÿ
1982:6;ÿ
17:2;88ÿ
1192944ÿ
1142885ÿ
1762:5;ÿÿ
1172:88ÿÿ
18128;:ÿÿ

7:2958ÿ
7:2975ÿ
7823:3ÿ
6426:3ÿ
782::5ÿ
772398ÿÿ
652463ÿÿ
7:2;61ÿÿ

5525;9ÿ
;:24;8ÿ
5;2764ÿ
492:8:ÿ
5:2916ÿ
;72673ÿ
572:56ÿ
5129;5ÿ

6732999ÿ
67;2173ÿ
6152;96ÿ
6632953ÿ
6842158ÿ
6652535ÿ
1;32;:9ÿ
1482691ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

456789ÿÿÿ
4� 9�8ÿ�ÿ��8�9ÿ�6��ÿ��9ÿ

���ÿ�������ÿ!"#��"$ÿ�%%&amp;!'�(�#��)ÿ
*++ÿ�&amp;�$ÿ!,ÿ��"-ÿ�&amp;��.ÿ"!#ÿ
�"�/-�"�ÿ0!/#�ÿ1�&amp;ÿ2�3�4ÿ
5�6��!%(�"#ÿ%�7�&amp;"$ÿ8�#��"ÿ#��ÿ
�������ÿ��6�ÿ9��"ÿ-�#�#�-ÿ�"ÿ��&amp;��ÿ
%�&amp;#ÿ9)ÿ�#$ÿ��!�&amp;�%�).ÿ9!/"-�-ÿ9)ÿ
8�#�&amp;ÿ,��#/&amp;�$.ÿ$#��%ÿ$�!%�$.ÿ
8�#��"-$.ÿ�"-ÿ-/"�$4ÿ:!&amp;�$#$ÿ!6�&amp;ÿ
$#��%�);$�!%�-ÿ����$�-�$ÿ8����ÿ
8�#��"-ÿ6���#�&lt;!"ÿ�"-ÿ�!8��"-ÿ
8!!-$ÿ�&amp;�ÿ,!/"-ÿ�"ÿ�!8�&amp;ÿ
���6�&lt;!"$4ÿ=�#�ÿ&gt;ÿ/(/��&lt;6�ÿ(���$ÿ
!,ÿ$�!&amp;���"�ÿ!"ÿ2�3�ÿ?�����"ÿ�"-ÿ
0!/#�ÿ1�&amp;ÿ2�3�.ÿ��3�,&amp;!"#ÿ�!(�$ÿ
�&amp;�ÿ�6����9��ÿ��!"�ÿ#��ÿ$�!&amp;�$ÿ!,ÿ
9!#�ÿ2�3�ÿ?�����"ÿ�"-ÿ0!/#�ÿ1�&amp;ÿ
2�3�4ÿ
=����ÿ(�")ÿ%�&amp;#$ÿ!,ÿ#��ÿ�������ÿ�&amp;�ÿ
/&amp;&amp;�"#�)ÿ-�6��!%�-.ÿ#��&amp;�ÿ
"�6�&amp;#����$$ÿ&amp;�(��"$ÿ$��"�@�"#ÿ
�&amp;����ÿ#��#ÿ!A�&amp;$ÿ!%%!&amp;#/"�&lt;�$ÿ
,!&amp;ÿ"�8ÿ-�6��!%(�"#ÿ#��#ÿ(�)ÿ9�ÿ
"��-�-ÿ�"ÿ#��ÿ,/#/&amp;�ÿ#!ÿ(��#ÿ
�!/$�"�.ÿ�!"!(�.ÿ!&amp;ÿ$�&amp;6��ÿ
ÿ

"��-$4ÿ���ÿ,/#/&amp;�ÿ��"-ÿ/$�ÿ���(�"#ÿ �"6�&amp;!"(�"#��ÿ,��#/&amp;�$.ÿ
!((/"�#)ÿ"��-$.ÿ�"-ÿ6�$�!"ÿ
!,ÿ#��ÿ?�$#�&amp;ÿB��"ÿ���!�#�$ÿ��"-ÿ#!ÿ
#�3�ÿ�"#!ÿ� !/"#ÿ!((/"�#)ÿ$!�!; �"-ÿ�!��$4ÿÿ
�!"!(�ÿ#&amp;�"-$.ÿ&amp;���ÿ�$#�#�ÿ
XMJMNÿ�-�"&lt;@�$ÿ#��ÿ%�&amp;(�7�-ÿ
(�&amp;3�#ÿ,�#!&amp;$.ÿ#&amp;�"$%!&amp;#�&lt;!".ÿ��"-ÿ Fÿ ^
��"-ÿ/$�$ÿ,!&amp;ÿ���ÿ��!�&amp;�%��ÿ
/$�ÿ&amp;���&lt;!"$��%$.ÿ�"-ÿ!((/"�#)ÿ
&amp;��ÿ�"ÿ#��ÿ�������4ÿ���ÿ_!"�"�ÿ
6��/�$4ÿC!"$�$#�"#ÿ8�#�ÿ#��ÿ�'�$&lt;"�ÿ �
(�%ÿ$�!8$ÿ8��#ÿ�$ÿ���!8�-ÿ#!ÿ
6������ÿ��&amp;�#�&amp;.ÿ#��$ÿ%��"ÿ
! /&amp;ÿ������)ÿ!"ÿ�ÿ%�&amp;��;9);
%&amp;!(!#�$ÿ#��ÿ!"&lt;"/�&lt;!"ÿ!,ÿ#��ÿ
%�&amp;��ÿ9�$�$.ÿ̀abc`deaffÿ!,ÿ#��ÿ
(�'�-;/$�ÿ-!8"#!8"ÿ�&amp;��.ÿ
/&amp;&amp;�"#ÿ�'�$&lt;"�ÿ/$�ÿ,!&amp;ÿ#��#ÿ
%&amp;!6�-�$ÿ,!&amp;ÿ6�&amp;��-ÿ�!/$�"�ÿ#)%�$.ÿ
%�&amp;��4ÿ
�"-ÿ����8�)ÿ!((�&amp;���ÿ
-�6��!%(�"#4ÿD�!((�"-�&lt;!"$ÿ Fÿ ���ÿgShSWHÿPQMRÿSKHÿTQUÿQMRÿ
�&amp;�ÿ9/��#ÿ#�&amp;!/��ÿ�"��)$�$ÿ!,ÿ$�6�&amp;��ÿ RHKVWJULXMKÿ�-�"&lt;,)ÿ#��ÿ
%&amp;�,�&amp;&amp;�-ÿ%�7�&amp;"$ÿ!,ÿ
#)%�$ÿ!,ÿ(�%$ÿ�"-ÿ-�$&amp;�%&lt;!"$ÿEÿÿ
-�6��!%(�"#ÿ�"-ÿ
Fÿ ���ÿHIJKLMNÿPQMRÿSKHÿTQUÿQMRÿ
&amp;�-�6��!%(�"#ÿ�"-ÿ�&amp;�ÿ9�$�-ÿ
RHKVWJULXMKÿ�-�"&lt;,)ÿ#��ÿ
!"ÿ#��ÿ�!��$ÿ�"-ÿ!9i�&lt;6�$ÿ
/&amp;&amp;�"#.ÿY!"ÿ#��ÿ�&amp;!/"-.Zÿ/$�$ÿ
-�"&lt;@�-ÿ�"ÿ#��ÿ%��""�"�ÿ
!,ÿ%&amp;!%�&amp;&lt;�$ÿ8�#��"ÿ#��ÿ�������4ÿ �
%&amp;!�$$4ÿ���ÿ,/#/&amp;�ÿ��"-ÿ/$�ÿ
\"ÿ/"-�&amp;$#�"-�"�ÿ!,ÿ�'�$&lt;"�ÿ
(�%ÿ�$ÿ"!#ÿ�"#�"-�-ÿ#!ÿ9�ÿ
��"-ÿ/$�$ÿ�$ÿ"��-�-ÿ#!ÿ�"$/&amp;�ÿ
%�&amp;��ÿ$%��@jÿ,/#/&amp;�ÿ��"-ÿ/$�ÿ
#��#ÿ,/#/&amp;�ÿ-�6��!%(�"#ÿ�$ÿ
&amp;�!((�"-�&lt;!"$ÿ�&amp;�ÿ�"#�"-�-ÿ
!(%�&lt;9��ÿ8�#�ÿ#��ÿ�������]$ÿ
#!ÿ9�ÿ/$�-ÿ�$ÿ�ÿ�!"�;&amp;�"��ÿkl+mÿ
�'�$&lt;"�ÿ��&amp;�#�&amp;.ÿ
)��&amp;$n.ÿ��"�&amp;��ÿ�/�-�ÿ,!&amp;ÿ

op7q9ÿrs�q�tÿu�q�6�v9ÿ�ÿw9x6ys�ÿ8sÿ859ÿz6�89ÿ{x6�ÿ

���ÿ?�$#�&amp;ÿB��"ÿ�"-ÿ|!"�"�ÿ}&amp;-�"�"�ÿ�&amp;�ÿ�!$��)ÿ!""�#�-.ÿ�"-ÿ9!#�ÿ��6�ÿ�(%!&amp;#�"#ÿ�(%�#$ÿ!"ÿ��"-ÿ/$�ÿ�"-ÿ-�6��~
!%(�"#4ÿ���ÿ?�����"ÿ|!"�"�ÿ"�9��"�ÿ\#ÿkB\ÿ+ÿ!,ÿl++*nÿ&amp;�/�&amp;�$ÿÿ_!"�"�ÿ#!ÿ9�ÿ9�$�-ÿ!"ÿ�"ÿ�-!%#�-ÿ%��"ÿ#��#ÿ�$ÿ
-�$��"�-ÿ#!ÿ%&amp;!(!#�ÿ#��ÿ����#�.ÿ$�,�#).ÿ�"-ÿ��"�&amp;��ÿ8��,�&amp;�ÿ!,ÿ���ÿ�&lt;_�"$4ÿ���ÿ(�$#�&amp;ÿ%��"ÿ%&amp;!6�-�$ÿ�/�-�"�ÿ,!&amp;ÿ_!"~
�"�ÿ-��$�!"$.ÿ�"�/-�"�ÿ�(�"-(�"#$ÿ#!ÿ#��ÿ#�'#ÿ!&amp;ÿ#��ÿ_!"�"�ÿ(�%4ÿ\$ÿ$/�.ÿ_!"�"�ÿ�$ÿ#��ÿ(�#�!-ÿ(!$#ÿ!((!"�)ÿ/$�-ÿ
#!ÿ����6�ÿ(�$#�&amp;ÿ%��"ÿ�!��$4ÿ!8�6�&amp;.ÿ�#]$ÿ�(%!&amp;#�"#ÿ#!ÿ&amp;�!�"�_�ÿÿ#��#ÿ#��ÿ?�$#�&amp;ÿB��"ÿ�$ÿ!"�)ÿ�ÿ�/�-�.ÿ�"-ÿÿ�""!#ÿ
�",!&amp;�ÿ8��&amp;�ÿ!&amp;ÿ�!8ÿ$!(�#��"�ÿ�$ÿ9/��#4ÿ���ÿ|!"�"�ÿ}&amp;-�"�"�.ÿ!"ÿ#��ÿ!#��&amp;ÿ��"-.ÿ�$ÿ�ÿx9t6xxÿ9�sv96x9ÿx6ÿ#��#ÿ
&amp;��/��#�$ÿ��"-ÿ�"-ÿ9/��-�"�$.ÿ�"-ÿ�$#�9��$��$ÿ$#�"-�&amp;-$ÿ,!&amp;ÿ-�6��!%(�"#4ÿ
01ÿ

�ÿ

345467894 ÿ8�4���ÿ�4���43ÿ
�4��6�ÿ�4ÿ7ÿ4�84�43ÿ7ÿ
7����ÿ�ÿ�4ÿ4�ÿ����4�ÿÿÿ
���7���ÿ�4ÿ� �4�ÿ�6 �ÿ�7���ÿ
3ÿ7�4�ÿ876���4��ÿ�4ÿ�66�4ÿ7�ÿ
!98��4ÿ� 43�ÿ7ÿ667"ÿ�7�ÿ
�4�7 #64ÿ��7"�ÿ7ÿ#4ÿ
��79973 43ÿ"��ÿ9��9 6ÿ6 3ÿ
��4ÿ�7$���ÿ7�ÿ4�%54ÿ
45��794 6ÿ�98���ÿ"��64ÿ
667"��ÿ�7�ÿ�4ÿ�7% �%7ÿ7�ÿ
4���% �ÿ�7994���6�ÿ�4��34%6�ÿ7�ÿ
�4��4%7 6ÿ��4��ÿ�7ÿ8�75�34ÿÿ
�7 4�ÿ�7�ÿ�4�4ÿ����4ÿ6 3ÿ��4ÿ
34����7��ÿ���ÿ��84�ÿ��6�34�ÿ
34����8%7�ÿ7�ÿ4���% �ÿ6 3ÿ��4ÿ 3ÿ
4���#7��773ÿ&amp;84�ÿ�7�3ÿ�ÿ�4ÿ
�66�4�ÿ����4�ÿ 3ÿ7887���%4�ÿ
� ÿ�54ÿ#44ÿ�34%'43ÿ�7�ÿ4��ÿ
��4�ÿ 3ÿ����4ÿ6 3ÿ��4ÿ
34����8%7�ÿ 3ÿ�4�79943%7�ÿ
�7�ÿ�4ÿ�7667"��ÿ3������(ÿ
)ÿ +4��34%6ÿ
)ÿ ��6%864,-9�6&amp;ÿ+4��34%6ÿ
)ÿ �66�4ÿ.7�4/���43ÿ0�4ÿ
)ÿ 144�6ÿ.7994���6ÿ
)ÿ 2���ÿ33����6ÿ
)ÿ +4��4%74.7�4�5%7ÿÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

UVWXÿZ[\]Xÿ^X[VVXÿ

567ÿ9:;&lt;=&gt;ÿ
!���% �ÿ2 3ÿ0�4ÿ� 8ÿ@8�ÿABÿ'���4ÿ
CDÿ 3ÿ-���4ÿ2 3ÿ0�4ÿ� 8ÿ@8�ÿAEÿ
3ÿ'���4ÿAD(ÿÿ��4�4ÿ9 8�ÿ�4ÿ7ÿ
� 4343ÿ7ÿ#4ÿ��43ÿ7ÿ344�9�4ÿ
�4ÿ�84��'�ÿ67�%7�ÿ 3ÿ
F����3��%7 6ÿ#7�3��4�ÿ7�ÿ
"46 3�ÿ��#F4�ÿ7ÿ�4��6%7�ÿ
�34�ÿ��ÿBGB�ÿH46 3�ÿ
��74�%7ÿI�ÿ7�ÿ������ ÿJ ��6ÿ
+4�7���4�ÿ 3ÿ!5��794 6ÿ
��74�%7ÿI��ÿKLLAÿ��I�ÿAEK�ÿ�ÿ
94343ÿ7�ÿM4�%7ÿAGAÿ7�ÿ�4ÿ
�434�6ÿ.64 ÿH 4�ÿI��ÿBBÿ0�M�.�ÿ
M4�%7ÿKBAAÿNOPQNR�ÿS 6&amp;ÿ ÿ7,��4ÿ
"46 3ÿ346�4%7ÿ�ÿ54��'43ÿ#&amp;ÿ
�4ÿ������ ÿ�48�94 ÿ7�ÿ
!5��794 �ÿ1�4 ÿ2T4�ÿ 3ÿ
!4��&amp;ÿ@!12!Dÿ 3ÿ�4ÿ0�M�ÿI�9&amp;ÿ
.7�8�ÿ7�ÿ!��44��ÿ��66ÿ#4ÿ��43ÿ�7�ÿ
F����3��%7 6ÿ344�9� %7��ÿÿÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ 789:;&lt;=ÿ?@&lt;AÿB:CÿD@Eÿ ÿ

ÿ

FG9=HICÿJK

345ÿ5789 ÿ��ÿ�95ÿ���ÿ��������ÿ���ÿ�������ÿ!"�ÿ���ÿ#�"���$ÿ����ÿ"&amp;ÿ'�"'�����ÿ(�����ÿ���ÿ)�**+#�,ÿ-�ÿ�������+����#ÿ"&amp;ÿ�./
����#ÿ*+��ÿ����ÿ��ÿ������ÿ�"ÿ������ÿ��+�ÿ&amp;�����ÿ��0�*"'1���ÿ��ÿ�"1'+�2*�ÿ(���ÿ���ÿ)�**+#�3�ÿ�.����#ÿ��+�+����ÿ��0��"�1���+*ÿ
&amp;�+�����ÿ�"11����4ÿ�����ÿ+��ÿ0���"�ÿ+��ÿ#"+*�,ÿÿ
Ex isting Land Use
1

Vi:lllage of Empire
-

Com ,erci11[

-

lns11tutonal

-

Racrearu11.n1c11m;;erw1100

R:e id~"·~•

-

-

-

Public R 0 111 d/st it: c1
. , Pri vntc Strc,i:t

-

Slrc11J11

l222l E.,cls!!

g\'ie1lllllHI ;u,ea

5

ngs..,ro.,

0

01ÿ

�ÿ 345657ÿ9 ÿ ÿ
ÿ

7���ÿ��

������ÿ��������ÿ!"�ÿ#�$%�&amp;��ÿ'(��ÿ)���ÿ*+$ÿ�(,"ÿ-�+-$(#"�,ÿ($�(ÿ��ÿ!"�ÿ.�''(-�/ÿ0"�ÿ1+���-ÿ%(#ÿ�"+2�ÿ2"(!ÿ��ÿ('3
'+2��ÿ!+ÿ+,,)$ÿ'�-(''4ÿ+�ÿ(ÿ#($,�'5645#($,�'ÿ6(���7ÿ89:;8&lt;=9&gt;&gt;ÿ+*ÿ!"�ÿ,)$$��!ÿ�?����-ÿ)��ÿ*+$ÿ!"(!ÿ#($,�'/ÿ
ÿ
Zoning
Vil Iage of E mp.ire

A.
Chippewu Run
Natural Area

S.eeping Bear Oune5 Niltlorial Lakethore

00ÿ

�ÿ 456578ÿ ÿ��8ÿ� �ÿ ÿ
ÿ

���578ÿ��

���ÿ������ÿ!"#$ÿ�%�ÿ&amp;"'ÿ"#$ÿ$�%(�)'*+#%ÿ,-�./01ÿ2��ÿ34�0�44�-ÿ356�4.7ÿ80ÿ-�9�:83;�.2ÿ5.-ÿ4�-�9�:83;�.2&lt;ÿ5.-ÿ
54�ÿ=57�-ÿ8.ÿ2��ÿ&gt;85:7ÿ5.-ÿ8=?�@/9�7ÿ,-�./A�-ÿ,.ÿ2��ÿ3:5..,.&gt;ÿ348@�77Bÿ���ÿ0C2C4�ÿ:5.-ÿC7�ÿ;53ÿ,7ÿ.82ÿ,.2�.-�-ÿ28ÿ
=�ÿ354@�:ÿ73�@,A@Dÿ0C2C4�ÿ:5.-ÿC7�ÿ4�@8;;�.-5/8.7ÿ54�ÿ,.2�.-�-ÿ28ÿ=�ÿC7�-ÿ57ÿ5ÿ:8.&gt;E45.&gt;�ÿFGHIÿ1�547J&lt;ÿ&gt;�.�45:ÿ
&gt;C,-�ÿ084ÿ-�9�:83;�.2ÿ356�4.7BÿK�7,4�-ÿ4�7C:27ÿ54�ÿ.82ÿ�L3�@2�-ÿ28ÿ8@@C4ÿ,.ÿ2��ÿ.�54ÿ0C2C4�BÿÿFM53ÿ4�.-�4,.&gt;ÿ=1ÿ
N��:5.5CÿO8C.21&lt;ÿPQC5:,R5/8.ÿK�3542;�.2JBÿ
\

I

!

Future Land Use

I

Village of Empire

/

WR~

r•-•- l --•-•-•-•-•-•-•-•- ~cEST

ii

II

~

_.,,/

~

f

-'

5}1

I

~

I
I
I
I

i

I
I
I
I
I
I
•
I
I Q:- ,·

Sout/,,

Bar Lake

i ~/
; §;'
i ft
~-'
•; :s,

'; , , ,

Lake Mic/,,igavt

;

i
;

I

\
I

i
i
i
Lake Michigan
Beach Par!&lt;

f

j ~ AS&lt;

i ~~.-i;, , ,
.'

-~--~~

Ii~

:5,,,

I

I

i
I

i
,.,·

,·i

i

;

I
I

WW/LC£ ST

WWILCEST
:Z

a:
8
l ;!;
;;;

,.

,.,· i

~~

__,.;.;-'-==='-'---i's+------

r~-~

,·

c; I

: ~

I

VI I
WM/CH/GAN

j

ST

j

tn

I WSOUTH

I -ST- ,

/'v

Public Road
/ '',/ Private Road

t:..".:.."! Village Boundary

-

DEQ - Critical Dunes Wetlands
Institutional

Commercial Residential Light Industrial
Multi-Family Residential

Recreation / Parkland
Residential
Village Core - Mixed Use

Thi s map is prepare d by Leelanau County for refere nce purposes only. Leelanau Cou nty is not liable for any errors that may be found in this map.

01ÿ

RHerman_ S.13 .2019

�ÿÿÿÿ4567859 ÿ
ÿ

����ÿ���ÿ�����ÿ����������ÿ��ÿ
�������ÿ!�"ÿ#�$$���ÿ%����&amp;ÿ�'�%�ÿ
��(ÿ�)ÿ���ÿ*�$$���+�ÿ$��ÿ����ÿ��ÿ
��������,�ÿ��ÿ��������$ÿ$��ÿ%��-ÿ
.�/���+�ÿ�����'������ÿ���ÿ
/������$0ÿ���/���ÿ�)ÿ����$�ÿ)���$0ÿ
������ÿ�����ÿ����$0ÿ'%�$�ÿ
���%�ÿ���ÿ��1�2��ÿ����%�0&amp;ÿ#���ÿ
����ÿ������$01������%���&amp;ÿ$����1
$��ÿ�����ÿ$�����ÿ��ÿ���ÿ��%��#���ÿ
������ÿ�)ÿ���ÿ*�$$���ÿ34����ÿ5�$$&amp;ÿ
5�������ÿ5�$$�6&amp;ÿ����ÿ���ÿ%���ÿ����&amp;ÿ
#���ÿ7�#ÿ7����'�����ÿÿ��ÿ
.�/���ÿ5�$$�ÿ�%'�8������ÿ$�����ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ��%������ÿ������ÿ�)ÿ���ÿ*�$$���-ÿ
9��ÿ:��8��ÿ;���&lt;ÿ��������$ÿ
�8�$�/����ÿ��ÿ$�����ÿ�=�����ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ4$��/���ÿ:���ÿ*�������ÿ;�����-ÿÿ
9��ÿ�8�����ÿ��������$ÿ�����0ÿ�)ÿ
���ÿ*�$$���ÿ��ÿ?-!"ÿ%����ÿ/��ÿ����-ÿ
.@�����ÿ��������$ÿ$���ÿ8��0ÿ��ÿ��,�ÿ
)���ÿ�2@?��ÿ)���ÿ$���ÿ��ÿ���ÿ*�$$���ÿ
����&amp;ÿ��ÿ$����ÿ$���ÿ��ÿ���ÿ����ÿ���ÿ
�)ÿ4�%��ÿ:��ÿA�&lt;�ÿ�������ÿ%/ÿ��ÿ
����$0ÿ�2ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ��,�-ÿ
ÿ9��ÿ*�$$���+�ÿ��,�ÿ�$$�#�ÿ)��ÿ
��������$ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ�@���ÿ��ÿ�$���ÿ
/��@����0ÿ��ÿ*�$$���ÿ��������ÿ�%��ÿ
��ÿ/��&lt;�&amp;ÿ/$�0���%��&amp;ÿ���//���&amp;ÿ
��%�����&amp;ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ���8����-ÿÿÿB���ÿ
�)ÿ���ÿ��%����ÿ����&lt;ÿ��ÿ$�����ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ*�$$���ÿ��������$ÿ
�����'������ÿ��ÿ#�$&lt;�'$�ÿ�������ÿ
#���ÿ$�#��ÿ���C�ÿ8�$%���-ÿÿ
DE979Fÿ
9����ÿ���ÿG8�ÿ3�6ÿ,�����ÿ��������ÿ
$�����ÿ#�����ÿ���ÿ*�$$���ÿ����ÿ�$$�#ÿ
)��ÿ��������$ÿ%��-ÿ9����ÿ���ÿ
H�����$ÿI�������$ÿ3HI6&amp;ÿÿB�@�ÿ

I�������$ÿ3BI6&amp;ÿ*�$$���ÿI�������$ÿ
3*I6&amp;ÿJ$����ÿK���ÿL�8�$�/����ÿ
3JKL6ÿ��ÿ;��������$ÿI�������$ÿ
3;I6-ÿÿ
MEN679FÿOPEQRÿ
9��ÿ�2?SÿT�������ÿ;���%���0ÿ
4%�8�0ÿ��������ÿ����ÿ�����ÿ���ÿ!�"ÿ
��%����ÿ%����-ÿ��(ÿ#���ÿ�#���1
���%/��&amp;ÿ?!(ÿ#���ÿ������1
efgÿifjklfmnkopÿqrmjnisqnkrmÿkmÿntfÿukppovfÿ
���%/��&amp;ÿ��ÿ!S(ÿ#���ÿ��������ÿ
wrifÿ
8�����ÿ)��ÿ�������$ÿ%��-ÿÿ
��ÿ�����&lt;-ÿL�8����ÿ������ÿ��%����ÿ
�0/��&amp;ÿ���$%���ÿ�������ÿ$�8���ÿ��ÿ
�&lt;�$$�ÿ�%�����ÿ)���$����&amp;ÿ�����ÿ'�ÿ
����ÿ)��ÿ����ÿ/����ÿ�)ÿ���ÿ
/�/%$����-ÿ̀����ÿ�//�������ÿ��ÿ
Z7 F5ÿQ[YQP5Yÿ
������ÿ��%����ÿ�$$�#ÿ�������ÿ��ÿa���ÿ
*�$$���ÿ�����'������ÿ)���%��ÿ�ÿ��@ÿ ��ÿ/$���bÿ'0ÿ���%����ÿ����ÿ���$��ÿ
����ÿ��ÿ�����$ÿ���8����ÿ���ÿ
�)ÿ��������ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ�%����ÿ
��\����ÿ����ÿ)�����ÿ�ÿ������ÿ���$$1 �8��$�'$�ÿ��ÿ�������'$�ÿ��ÿ�������ÿ
��#�ÿ)��$-ÿ9���%���%�ÿ���ÿ�2?]ÿ $���$$0ÿ��ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ�����-ÿ
B�����ÿJ$��ÿ/������&amp;ÿ/%'$��ÿ��/%�ÿ `��ÿ#�0ÿ��ÿ����������ÿ����ÿ
�$���$0ÿ��/����,�ÿ���ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ ����ÿ��ÿ����%��ÿ���$%����ÿ�)ÿ
������ÿ���ÿ*�$$���+�ÿ���$$1��#�ÿ
a�������ÿ�� $�bÿ��%����ÿ�0/��&amp;ÿ
���������-ÿ
�%��ÿ��ÿ%/$�@��&amp;ÿ)�%�1/$�@��&amp;ÿ
��������0ÿ#�$$���ÿ%����&amp;ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ
MEN679FÿWX E96ÿ
���%�1�����0ÿ��%����ÿ�0/��ÿ����ÿ
7�����$ÿ�����ÿ��#��ÿ�����&lt;���ÿ ���ÿ����������ÿ#���ÿ����$�ÿ)���$0ÿ
��%����$ÿ��,��ÿ����ÿ����ÿ����ÿ �����'������-ÿ
��%����ÿ%����ÿ#�$$ÿ'�ÿ����ÿ���/$0ÿ `����ÿ��%����ÿ�/����ÿ����ÿ���ÿ
��ÿ��������ÿ�@�����ÿ/�/%$����ÿ ��/������ÿ��ÿ���ÿ*�$$���+�ÿ�%�����ÿ
$�8�$�^$��ÿ�$���ÿ��ÿ�\����ÿ��#ÿ ��ÿ)%�%��ÿ/�/%$����ÿ���$%�ÿ
��������&amp;ÿ�ÿ#��&lt;)����&amp;ÿ��ÿ)���$���&amp;ÿ a����������$bÿ�8�$�/����ÿ�0/��&amp;ÿ
� �����$ÿ��%����ÿ%����-ÿH�8��ÿ���ÿ ����ÿ�$$�#ÿ���$$1���$�ÿ��$%����ÿ��ÿ
*�$$���ÿ/�/%$����ÿ�����&amp;ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ �@�����ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ�����'������-ÿ
$�&lt;�$0ÿ��ÿ'�ÿ�ÿ�����%�ÿ����ÿ)��ÿ ;��8�����ÿ����$�1)���$0ÿ�����ÿ����ÿ
��%����-ÿL����ÿ��0ÿ���_&amp;ÿ
1)���$0ÿ�����dÿ�$$�#���ÿ
��#�8��&amp;ÿ)���ÿ$�����ÿ����$�ÿ)���$0ÿ ��#�
���#����ÿ��ÿ����ÿ�%�ÿ��ÿ�@���ÿ
�����ÿ��ÿ���$$��ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ�%$�1 '�
ÿ��ÿ�����������ÿ
)���$0ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ���ÿ/�/%$����ÿ '����������d
�ÿ��%���ÿ%���ÿ�������ÿ
����ÿ��ÿ��%����$ÿ��,�ÿ�����%��ÿ

U66N56ÿVÿ
WXXEYPN9756ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

34567893ÿ7 ÿ7��ÿ4��9575ÿ
7��97��3ÿ5�75ÿ�7ÿ�963ÿ�4� 3ÿ
�9�6�7893�4ÿ�78�6�7�ÿ5�ÿ
37397�ÿ�9��9�ÿ5�75ÿ43ÿ�48�7�ÿ59ÿ
���4 �3ÿ596435ÿ�99���ÿ
� !"#$%&amp;'ÿ)!*+,-.ÿ
019�72�ÿ�96343ÿ43ÿ�4 �ÿ73ÿ
�96343ÿ5�75ÿ�9353ÿ567ÿ9ÿ�33ÿ9�ÿ7ÿ
�963�9���3ÿ4�9� �ÿ87�4�43ÿ9ÿ
4�4�4�67�3ÿ5�75ÿ�7�ÿ�9 ÿ5�7ÿ567ÿ
9�ÿ5�4ÿ4�9� ÿ�9ÿ�96343ÿ7 ÿ
�934� �ÿ�935ÿ9� 26� ��ÿ
9� ÿ�963�9��3ÿ7 ÿ�935ÿ
9� 26� ��ÿ5��ÿ7 ÿ75ÿ7ÿ�43� ÿ
43�ÿ9�ÿ�9 ��936 ÿ9ÿ�9� �33 33:ÿ
9ÿ7 ÿ�9 ÿ�4���ÿ59ÿ�9�ÿ459ÿ
362357�7�ÿ9ÿ9� �9���ÿ
�96343�ÿ��4��ÿ�7ÿ�7�ÿ3 4963ÿ
4��7�53ÿ9ÿ;67�45�ÿ9�ÿ�4��ÿ3��99�ÿ
� �9�7��ÿ7�ÿ� ��&lt;243�ÿ
=6�8��ÿ�96343ÿ356�43�ÿ4��6�43ÿ
5�ÿ&gt;6?@ÿA �776ÿB965�ÿC96343ÿ
D735ÿ=7�5ÿ0 7��343ÿ7�ÿ5�ÿ
EFGHIJKFLÿNKFÿOPFÿEPQPFI�ÿ�7�ÿ
�96�ÿ34344�75ÿ3�95733ÿ9�ÿ
�96343ÿ5�75�3ÿ719�72�ÿ59ÿ�7�ÿ
�753ÿ9�ÿ5�ÿB965��3ÿ�9�6�789�ÿ
R95 87�ÿS4��73ÿ7�893ÿ5�75ÿ�96��ÿ
7�� 33ÿ5�93ÿ3�95733ÿ4��6�ÿ
� 736 3ÿ5�75ÿ�96��ÿ35 7��4 ÿ
5�ÿT943ÿ�9�33:ÿ�9�4�ÿ
36�759�ÿ36��95ÿ�9ÿ�4� 3ÿ
�96343ÿ9�893:ÿ7�ÿ�7�ÿ�7�ÿ
7�74�72�ÿ�9ÿ�4� 3ÿ�96343ÿ5��3�ÿÿ
U'$+!-$&amp;ÿV'-W$&amp;+ÿ
Xÿ7ÿ37397�ÿ�9��645�ÿ�45�ÿ
34344�75ÿ596435ÿ7�8�45�ÿ�4�ÿ
���4 �ÿ37397�ÿ 57�3ÿ7 ÿ7ÿ
4��9575ÿ�9�343ÿ9�89ÿ�9ÿ
�434593ÿ5�75ÿ�9� ÿ�45�ÿ295�ÿ
�9348�ÿ7�ÿ 378�ÿ�9��645�ÿ
4��7�53�ÿX5�3ÿ4��9575ÿ�9ÿ5�ÿ
S4��73ÿ59ÿ�98 6ÿ453ÿ4�9� �ÿ

rstuvÿxyzzÿ{|}|zt~v|suyyzÿtv|ÿtÿzv|uÿtv~ÿt|uÿ

�945943ÿ9�ÿ5�ÿ4��7�5ÿ9�ÿ
�93435 5k�9��782�ÿ�45�ÿ5�ÿ
37397�ÿ 57�3ÿ9ÿ5�ÿS4��73ÿ7�ÿ
S4��73�3ÿ��77�5 �ÿÿ
453ÿ 396�3�ÿD�43ÿ�7�ÿ4��6�ÿ7ÿ bÿ X� � 57�ÿ�96343ÿ9�893ÿ�9ÿ
356��ÿ9�ÿ235ÿ�7�8�3ÿ73ÿ37397�ÿ
5�ÿ�9��9��ÿ36��ÿ73ÿ343�&lt;
57�ÿ7�8�45�ÿ4� 733�ÿÿÿ
99�ÿ 57�3ÿ4ÿ343�&lt;�7�4��ÿ
�9� 3�ÿ9ÿ297�43ÿ�9633�ÿ
3�96��ÿ2ÿ�934� �ÿ7�ÿ
7��9� �ÿ�� ÿ633ÿ7 ÿ
\']'&amp;!^_'-Wÿ̀!-+,#'"$a!-+ÿ
�48375��ÿÿ
bÿ 8656 ÿ���9�� 5ÿ3�96��ÿ
bÿ l9 &lt; 34� 87�ÿ633ÿ36��ÿ73ÿ
�93435ÿ9�ÿ343�ÿdÿ7�ÿ5�9&lt;
��6��3�ÿ�7�3�ÿ7�ÿ�7��7 ÿ
�7�4��ÿ633ÿ7�ÿ7��339�ÿ633ÿ
7 ÿ7�39ÿ7��9�475ÿ�� ÿ
4��6�43ÿ7��339�ÿ�� ��43ÿ
57m��ÿ943�ÿ34373�ÿ7�ÿ95� ÿ
6453�ÿ37� 3�ÿ7��339�ÿ
4��7�53ÿ59ÿ7�n7� 5ÿ63ÿ7 ÿ
356�56 3�ÿ7�ÿ�9� ÿ
�4�45��ÿÿ
9��6�7893�ÿ
bÿ o 348�ÿ �49� 57�ÿ
bÿ =6�8&lt;�7�4��ÿ�� ��433ÿ7�ÿ
�756 3ÿ3�96��ÿ2ÿ�95�5��ÿ
f�43343ÿ�4���gÿ 34� 87�ÿ
� 3 ���ÿ7�ÿ �7���ÿ
5��3�ÿ4��6�43ÿ�9� 3493ÿ9�ÿ
343�&lt;�7�4��ÿ�9� 3ÿ59ÿ�6�8&lt; V'+,#'-a$&amp;ÿÿ
�7�4��ÿ�9� 3�ÿ3�96��ÿ2ÿ
� �4h �ÿ�� ÿ�93435 5ÿ�45�ÿ D�ÿp34� 87�ÿ�4354�5ÿ�9� 3ÿ7ÿ
i438 3ÿ 34� 87�ÿ��77�5 �ÿ 34344�75ÿ�989ÿ9�ÿ5�ÿS4��73�3ÿ
�7�ÿ7 7�ÿ7�ÿ43ÿ�9�75�ÿ
bÿ j4� 3ÿ�96343ÿ5��3ÿ7�ÿ
�963�965ÿ5�ÿS4��73�ÿB6 5ÿ
3 �4�3ÿ�9ÿ3 493ÿ3�96��ÿ2ÿ 5
�7�ÿ63ÿ�45�4ÿ5�43ÿ�4354�5ÿ4��6�3ÿ
7��9� �ÿ�� ÿ4��7�53ÿ7 ÿ
95�ÿ�43594�ÿ7�ÿ � 5��&lt;264�5ÿ
�48375��ÿ0�6�5ÿ�935 ÿ�7 �ÿ 2
43�&lt;�7�4��ÿ�9� 3ÿ���9��ÿ4ÿ7ÿ
733435�ÿ�4�43�ÿ3�4���ÿ6343�ÿ 3
5�ÿ�9 ÿ
7�ÿ �75�ÿ�7�5�ÿ�7 ÿ3 �4�3ÿ 34��ÿ�57�h�ÿ���ÿ7�9�9�3�ÿ�4
7 ÿ7��ÿ �337�ÿ59ÿ5�ÿ7343ÿ 7 73ÿ7�ÿ362�4�4349ÿ33ÿ43�6��8ÿ773�ÿÿ
�9�6�789�ÿ7�ÿ3�96��ÿ2ÿ
C4���ÿ���4 ÿC4��3�ÿ7�ÿq7� ÿ
� �4h �ÿ�� ÿ4��7�53ÿ7 ÿ Bo59�ÿ
��ÿ0��4897����ÿ43856897�ÿ
�48375�ÿ7�ÿ�343ÿ43ÿ

Y*W*"'ÿZ$-#ÿ[+'ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

3454ÿ4378ÿ94ÿ837854ÿ95ÿ7�3�5�ÿ
ÿ�84ÿ79�5���ÿ94ÿ�5���ÿ
������ÿ���ÿ!"�ÿ#�$%&amp;&amp;���'%�"ÿ
)85ÿ�5�ÿ�*ÿ�85ÿ+54�5,9�ÿ-4�7�ÿ
4ÿ��ÿ.9 �9 ÿ�85ÿ73 5�ÿ
54�5,9�ÿ78997�5ÿ�*ÿ�85ÿ/��9�5ÿ
�8�5ÿ0�1� �ÿ5�ÿ8�34 �ÿ
�00��3 ,54�ÿ2 �ÿ3��ÿ9�ÿ
5�515��0.5�ÿ48�3��ÿ7�0�9�5ÿ
�85ÿ405737ÿ�.54�9�ÿ9�ÿ
43�� �ÿ78997�5 4,74ÿ�*ÿ�8545ÿ
5�84�8���4�ÿÿ
58�5ÿ73 5�ÿ*94�37�35ÿ
�.�9,�4ÿ.097�ÿ�515��0.5�ÿ
�54,54ÿ9�ÿ��0546ÿ�85ÿ�54�9�5�ÿ
+54�5,9�ÿ-4�7�ÿ48�3��ÿ45ÿ
5�9 5�ÿ*�ÿ���7ÿ9�ÿ.5�3.9
�54��ÿ54�5,9�ÿ�515��0.5�6ÿ
9���ÿ��8ÿ54�5,9�ÿ: 93��;ÿ
�515��0.5�ÿ59ÿ�85ÿ��� ��� ÿ
959ÿ�ÿ4.9��5ÿ0595&lt;4, �ÿ0�9=5�ÿ
���4�ÿ-4�7�ÿ5�3�9,�4ÿ48�3��ÿ45ÿ
&gt;5&lt;4�5ÿ5�3�8ÿ��ÿ57�39�5ÿ
�515��0.5�ÿ�89�ÿ4ÿ195�ÿÿ
�54��6ÿ�9�ÿ7�159�5ÿ9�ÿ���ÿ4?546ÿ
�5�ÿ7�.09,4�5ÿ��8ÿ7�..3 ��ÿ
78997�5ÿ9�ÿ.9�5�ÿ+54�5,9�ÿ
��054ÿ7�3� �ÿ19�34ÿ45 �ÿ
8�34 �ÿ�0,�46ÿ�85ÿ.44 �ÿ
.���56ÿ9�ÿ75.5�9�ÿ
�515��0.5�ÿ��054ÿ48�3��ÿ9�4�ÿ45ÿ
7�4�55�ÿ�85ÿ7�.09,4�5ÿ��8ÿ
7�..3 ��ÿ78997�5�ÿ
@�05,54ÿ��79�5�ÿ9�A975�ÿ��ÿ
B�3�8ÿC9ÿD9E5ÿ9�ÿD9E5ÿF 78�9ÿ
*975ÿ4�.5ÿ3 G35ÿ�9�5*��ÿ9�ÿ
51�.5�9�ÿ7�4�59,�46ÿ4378ÿ
94ÿ44354ÿ7�75 �ÿ7,79�ÿ�354ÿ
95946ÿ0��57�5�ÿ4057546ÿ�5��9�46ÿ
�9�5ÿG39���ÿ9�ÿ48�5�5ÿ
0��57,��ÿ

)85ÿF3�,0�5ÿZ9.��ÿ+54�5,9�ÿ
-4�7�ÿ7�3�54ÿ���ÿ0 .9�ÿ9594[ÿ
�85ÿ��85 ÿ89�*ÿ�*ÿ�85ÿ/��9�5ÿ
9���ÿD9�5\Z485ÿB�55�46ÿ9�ÿ
45��55ÿF 78�9ÿ9�ÿ2��4���8ÿ
B�55�4ÿÿ�85ÿ4�3�85 ÿ89�*ÿ�*ÿ�85ÿ
/��9�5�ÿC��8ÿ�4�7�4ÿ7�3�5ÿ1979�ÿ
�ÿ�515��094�5ÿ0�05���ÿÿ
������ÿ���ÿ!"�ÿ#�$%&amp;&amp;���'%�"ÿ
)85ÿ.3�,9*9.��ÿ54�5,9�ÿ
�515��0.5�ÿ79�5���ÿ4ÿ�5�5�ÿ
��ÿ977�..��9�5ÿ9ÿ.&lt;ÿ�*ÿ8�34 �ÿ
��054ÿ9�ÿ�54,546ÿ7�3� �ÿ4 ��5
9*9.��6ÿ���9*9.��6ÿ9�ÿ.3�,0�59
*9.��ÿ��5���46ÿ�ÿ���4ÿ19� �ÿÿ
4?5�ÿ]�85ÿ�54��ÿ54�5,9�ÿ3454ÿ
9�ÿ.44 �ÿ.���5ÿ8�34 �ÿ��0546ÿ
4378ÿ94ÿ909�.5�46ÿ��� 8�34546ÿ
7���. 3.46ÿ9�ÿ45 �ÿ8�34 �ÿ
*97�,546ÿ.9�ÿ45ÿ9����5��ÿ
�..3 ��ÿ3454ÿ4378ÿ94ÿ09E46ÿ
78378546ÿ478���46ÿ�49546ÿÿ
75.5�5 546ÿ98�.5ÿ�77309,�46ÿ
859��8ÿ795ÿ9�ÿ4�79�ÿ4517546ÿ9�ÿ
45�ÿ9�ÿ459E*94�ÿ*97�,54ÿ.9�ÿ
9�4�ÿ45ÿ9����5�ÿÿ�84ÿ959ÿ*ÿ
�54�5�ÿ��ÿ45ÿ7�.09,4�5ÿ��8ÿ�85ÿ
54�5,9�ÿ45^ ��ÿ
ÿ

HIJKLJMNOPQRJSÿUMVRWMXKPJÿÿ
01ÿ

�ÿÿÿÿÿJ.``&lt;AZ0RSaN01O&gt;ÿP/KQ=&gt;A0RSÿ
ÿ

34556789ÿ�6�ÿ84��56ÿ����ÿ
876�ÿ4�ÿ���ÿ�795 79�ÿ4��ÿ�74��ÿ
��766��ÿ��6ÿ��766��ÿ��ÿ��6ÿ !��ÿ
84779�47�ÿÿ"ÿ7�6ÿ5 #479��ÿ4�ÿ��6ÿ
$9 �6%�ÿ84556789ÿ�6�ÿ76ÿ
48�6�ÿ4�ÿ !��&amp;ÿ�4'6(67�ÿ)6��ÿ
�74��ÿ��766�ÿ9�ÿ��6ÿ�48 ÿ�49��ÿ4�ÿ��6ÿ
$9 �6�ÿ*4�+��ÿÿ�7�9+4� ÿ
�4'��4'�ÿ'9��ÿ*�9�6��6�ÿ��ÿ
76�9�6�+ ÿ�6��ÿ�456ÿ9���ÿ
9����79ÿ�6�ÿ76ÿ�4��ÿ4��9�6ÿ
��6ÿ$9 �6%�ÿ84556789ÿ��ÿ
76�9�6�+ ÿ76��ÿÿ

-./0/1ÿ

3�676ÿ76ÿ��766ÿ84556789ÿ44�9��ÿ
�9��798��ÿ'9��9�ÿ��6ÿ$9 �6�ÿ9�8 �9��ÿ
$9 �6ÿ3476�ÿ56�67ÿ34556789�ÿ
��ÿ�9���ÿ6����79ÿ�9��798���ÿ76�9�ÿ
�67(986ÿ6��*9��56����ÿ4886ÿ��86ÿ
��ÿ4��67ÿ�7�9+4� ÿ84556789ÿ
�6�ÿ76ÿ�675996�ÿ'9��9�ÿ��6�6ÿ
��766ÿ�9��798���ÿ��689ÿ�6�ÿ
9�8 �9���ÿ*�ÿ�4�ÿ959�6�ÿ�4�ÿ
4��9���ÿ�8�44�:89�98�ÿ��ÿ4�6�ÿ97ÿ
*�9�6��6�ÿ76ÿ�675996�ÿ�ÿ��689ÿ
�6��ÿÿ
;&lt;=&gt;ÿ@A./&gt;ÿB&gt;A&lt;&lt;&gt;ÿ
3�6ÿ84556789ÿ�6�ÿ48�6�ÿ4��ÿ
)6��ÿ�74��ÿ��766�ÿ845�79�6ÿ��6ÿ
C�4'��4'�Dÿ4�ÿ��6ÿ$9 �6�ÿ��ÿ
9�8 �6ÿÿ*6��ÿ4�ÿ76�9�6�+ ÿ��ÿ
84556789ÿ�6��ÿ3�9�ÿ�9��798�ÿ
�4��67�ÿÿ��74��ÿ�6��6ÿ4�ÿ
8455 �9��ÿ��ÿ6�847�6�ÿ
�6�6��79�ÿ886��ÿ�4ÿ76�9�6�+ ÿ
�69��*47�44��ÿ��ÿ�7���ÿ�6�76�ÿ
9�8 �6ÿ845�8�ÿ�6(64�56���ÿÿ
�6��9��ÿ��ÿ77��656��ÿ4�ÿ��ÿ
�6�ÿ'�98�ÿ6�847�6�ÿ�6�6��79�ÿ

bcdeÿghijeÿkehcceÿÿlÿhcemnoÿpihcÿ

8+(9���ÿ��ÿÿ59Fÿ4�ÿ76�9�6�+ ÿ��ÿ
959�6�ÿ84556789ÿ��ÿ�6�ÿ9�ÿ
�886���ÿ84!6F9��6�86�ÿÿÿ

GHIIÿJ.AA0K.Aÿ

L�98ÿ�67(986�ÿ�8�ÿ�ÿ��ÿ��+4���ÿ
M��89ÿ9��+�+4��ÿ��ÿ56�98 ÿ
�899+6�ÿ76ÿ48�6�ÿ4��ÿ��6ÿ !��ÿ
84779�47�ÿ3�6�6ÿ�6�ÿ�67(6ÿ*4��ÿ
76�9�6���ÿ��ÿ(9�9�47�ÿ9�6�ÿÿ
34556789ÿ�6(64�56��ÿ4��ÿ !
��ÿ9�ÿ�795 79�ÿ�6�6��79�!4796��6�ÿ
'9��ÿ884554�+4��ÿ9�ÿ�74(9�9��ÿ
�47ÿ��6ÿ �4!4796��6�ÿ886���ÿ
N01O&gt;ÿP/KQ=&gt;A0RSÿ
3�6ÿ$9 �6ÿ9�ÿ�456ÿ�4ÿÿ�5 ÿ9���ÿ
9����79ÿ76ÿ48�6�ÿ�ÿ��6ÿ
�47��6��ÿ847�67ÿ4�ÿ�9��67ÿ��ÿT7�ÿ
��766�ÿ���ÿ9�8 �6�ÿÿ4��!�675ÿ
��47�6ÿ��ÿÿ�44�ÿ�74�8+4�ÿ
�899���ÿ�ÿ'6ÿ�ÿ7�6ÿ�5���67�ÿ
(9*6ÿ�47ÿ�*98ÿ768�89���ÿÿ34ÿ
��6�ÿ�4ÿ��9+4� ÿ�74�67��ÿ9�ÿ
44�6�ÿ�9���ÿ6����79�

ÿ

01ÿ

P==Q&lt;=ÿUÿ
VWW.A&gt;Q/0X&lt;=ÿ

YAR/=W.A&gt;RX./ÿJ.//&lt;ZX./=ÿ
3788ÿ4��ÿ !��ÿ876�6�ÿ84�867��ÿ
�47ÿ�6�6��79�ÿ��6���ÿ�7+8 7�ÿ9�ÿ
��6ÿ�5567ÿ54�����ÿ'�6�ÿ�788ÿ
6(6�ÿ��ÿ84��6�+4�ÿ76ÿ�9���ÿ3�6ÿ
9��67�68+4�ÿ4�ÿ !��ÿ��ÿ ![�ÿ' �ÿ
��7�6��ÿ9�ÿ7686��ÿ�67��ÿ�4ÿÿ�47ÿ
' �ÿ��4�ÿ��ÿ�74(9�6�ÿ��67�ÿ
5 7�6�ÿ�6�6��79�ÿ874��' ���ÿÿ
P/\AR=&gt;AQZ&gt;QA&lt;ÿ
"��ÿ�6'ÿ84556789ÿ*�9�6��6�ÿ76ÿ
76]976�ÿ�4ÿ�6ÿÿ76�67(6ÿM6�ÿ��ÿÿ
�795 7�ÿM6�ÿ9�ÿ47�67ÿ�4ÿ566�ÿ
76� +4��ÿ4�ÿ��6ÿL6�496!�66 � ÿ
^6 ��ÿ_6�7�56��ÿ�47ÿ�6�+8ÿM6���ÿ
3�9�ÿ8�ÿ959�ÿ4�+4��ÿ�47ÿ
84556789ÿ�6(64�56���ÿÿ
34556789ÿ�6�ÿ5 ��ÿ�4�ÿÿ76]976ÿ
�7��67ÿ9�(6�+�+4�ÿ�4ÿ�6�6759�6ÿ
��76ÿ+9��ÿ9��7��78�76ÿ�66���ÿÿ
3�9�ÿ9�8 �6�ÿ+9+6�ÿ�8�ÿ�ÿ

�ÿ

mnooÿqrstuvÿÿwxyzwÿ{wy|sxÿwu}rÿy~ÿzuqrÿ

3435678594ÿ9637ÿ96�794ÿ�9�ÿ
@�!873?�ÿ8�6�785ÿ59795637ÿ9�ÿ
5����859���ÿ���63��ÿ�854��8�ÿ 3A8�� �ÿ��84�8�ÿ�6�43��ÿ
8���ÿ9�ÿ344ÿ9�ÿ7�9��ÿ9�ÿ
�8�3 94���ÿÿ�ÿ495�ÿ��ÿ9�9849�8486�ÿ��ÿ 9ÿ B967733ÿ336�55�9�!739��ÿ39���ÿÿÿ49��59!8�ÿ
63�3ÿ���63��ÿ�9�ÿ48�86ÿ�!���ÿ��7ÿ
5���375894ÿ�3�34�!�36ÿ�7ÿ��7ÿ 9ÿ C97�8�ÿ���4�ÿ�3ÿ4�5963�ÿ6�ÿ
�3�8�ÿ696ÿ�336�ÿ"8449�3ÿ!78�78�3�ÿ 63ÿ�8�3ÿ�7ÿ�38�ÿ��84�8��ÿ
86ÿ���67336ÿ!97�8�ÿ8ÿ�7�6�ÿÿ
��7ÿ94�9�8486��ÿ
9ÿ D344��986983�ÿ�8�3 94��ÿ�7ÿ
�637ÿ����6�78E3�ÿ
679�!�769��ÿ�!���ÿ���4�ÿ
0(1(2345(,&amp;ÿ63,/7-('+83,/ÿ
5� 356ÿ5���375894ÿ��3�ÿ6�ÿ
9ÿ ;3�34�!�36ÿ���4�ÿ
73�8�3�94ÿ9739�ÿ!97��ÿ9�ÿ
955�����963ÿ5���375894ÿ
�637ÿ38���7�����ÿÿ
��3�ÿ�3�8�3�ÿ6�ÿ�37�3ÿ63ÿ 9ÿ C��485ÿ��3�ÿ�7ÿ95��8�3�ÿ��5ÿ9�ÿ
��!!8�ÿ9�ÿ�37�853ÿ33��ÿ��ÿ
5����86�ÿ3�36�ÿ973ÿ
!9��ÿ67���ÿ679&lt;5ÿ9�ÿ344ÿ9�ÿ
35��79�3��ÿ
4�594ÿ73�8�36�ÿ9�ÿ�8�86�7��ÿÿ
9ÿ B3�8��3ÿ3�87��3694ÿ
9ÿ �44ÿ��3�ÿ!37�8&gt;3�ÿ8ÿ63ÿ
�396�73�ÿ���4�ÿ�3ÿ!7�63563�ÿ
73�8�3�94ÿ�8�67856ÿ854��8�ÿ
!73�37�3�ÿ9�ÿ3 953��ÿ
�8�43ÿ9�ÿ6���9�84�ÿ
� 3448��ÿ��4�!43��9�84�ÿ
9ÿ F8�6ÿ8���67894ÿ��3ÿ��37ÿ
���8�ÿ�38�7ÿ���8�ÿ63ÿ
B!35894ÿF9�ÿG�3ÿC37�86ÿ�4��ÿ
�8��8�ÿ�8��43ÿ9�ÿ
6355('H7+2ÿI(/7-(,8+2ÿ
8573�3694ÿ�3�34�!�36ÿ
6�!3�ÿ���4�ÿ�3ÿ5��8�373�ÿ 07/&amp;'7H&amp;ÿ
3ÿ��3�ÿ973ÿ5��!9��43ÿ86ÿ J3ÿK���375894ÿL3�8�3�94ÿ�8�67856ÿ
63ÿ"8449�3?�ÿ59795637ÿ9�ÿ 854��3�ÿ!7�!37�3�ÿ94��ÿM�NN�ÿ
��3�ÿ973ÿ9!!7�!789634�ÿ
F9�ÿ��3�ÿ868ÿ68�ÿ9739ÿ854��3ÿ
�8��963��ÿ;3�34�!�36ÿ
736984ÿ�&lt;53ÿ9�ÿ�37�853ÿ��3�ÿ9�ÿ
���4�ÿ�3ÿ5��8�636ÿ86ÿ
344ÿ9�ÿ8��6���94�ÿL3�8�3�94ÿ

$%&amp;%'(ÿ*+,-ÿ./(ÿÿ

01ÿ

��3�ÿ���4�ÿ�3ÿ85�7!�7963�ÿ�7ÿ
944� 3��ÿO�84�8��ÿ973ÿ�3Pÿ6�ÿ6��
�6�783�ÿ8� ÿ86ÿ!97�8�ÿ4�5963�ÿ
8ÿ�7�6ÿ��ÿ�7ÿ6�ÿ63ÿ�8�3ÿ��ÿ
��84�8���ÿÿ
RSTSUVÿXYZ[ÿ\]Vÿ
^V_`aaVZ[Yb`Z]ÿ
J3ÿ8636ÿ��ÿ63ÿK���375894ÿ
L3�8�3�94ÿ;8�67856ÿ8�ÿ6�ÿ!7��8�3ÿ9ÿ
�97836�ÿ��ÿ�37�853�ÿ9�ÿ736984ÿ
�!!�76�8�3�ÿ��7ÿ73�8�36�ÿ9�ÿ
�8�86�7�ÿ868ÿ9ÿ3�87��36ÿ696ÿ
8�ÿ�9�3ÿ��7ÿ�385�497ÿ!3�3�6789 ÿ
9�ÿ�85�543ÿ679&lt;5�ÿK��8�379��ÿ
���4�ÿ�3ÿ�8�3ÿ6�ÿ�!!�76�8�3�ÿ6�ÿ
85�7!�7963ÿ73�8�3�94ÿ
�3�34�!�36ÿ�ÿ63ÿ�35��ÿd��7ÿ
��ÿ5���375894ÿ��84�8��ÿ�7ÿ8ÿ�637ÿ
9739�ÿ868ÿ63ÿ�8�67856�ÿ
;3�34�!�36ÿ8ÿ63ÿ�8�67856ÿ���4�ÿ
�3ÿ!3�3�6789��78363�ÿ9�ÿ
94�9�43ÿ86ÿ5��8�636ÿ
�67336�59!3e49��59!8�ÿ9�ÿ
!97�8�ÿ4�5963�ÿ6�ÿ63ÿ�8�3ÿ�7ÿ7397ÿ
��ÿ��84�8���ÿ;3�8�ÿ��ÿ��84�8��ÿ
�8�9�3ÿ9�ÿ�637ÿ�396�73�ÿ���4�ÿ
73d356ÿ63ÿ"8449�3?�ÿ�8f�3ÿ
59795637�ÿÿ

g722+h(ÿ63'(ij7k(-ÿ./(ÿ
07/&amp;'7H&amp;ÿÿ

J3ÿ"8449�3ÿK�73�M8A3�ÿG�3ÿ�8�67856ÿ
854��3�ÿ!7�!37�3�ÿ94��ÿ3�6ÿ
l7�6ÿB67336�ÿF9�ÿ��3�ÿ868ÿ68�ÿ
9739ÿ854��3ÿ736984ÿ�&lt;53ÿ�37�853ÿ
9�ÿ8��6���94ÿ��3��ÿO�84�8��ÿ973ÿ
�3Pÿ6�ÿ6���6�783�ÿ8� ÿ86ÿ
�88�94ÿ�36�95���ÿC97�8�ÿ8�ÿ
4�5963�ÿ94��ÿ63ÿ�67336�ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ

�ÿ

PQRSSTUVÿXYZÿ[V\Y]V^ÿ_]TVÿ

345467ÿ9 ÿ�7ÿ
�7����7 �� �ÿ
���ÿ������ÿ��ÿ���ÿ����!�ÿ"�#�ÿ�$ÿ��ÿ
$%&amp;&amp;�#�ÿ�'ÿ��(�%#!�ÿ���ÿ
(��)�%)��ÿ��ÿ���ÿ*�+�',%$�ÿ
(�#(��#ÿ��ÿ���ÿ'�$�#�(�-ÿ.ÿ
/��(�'ÿ/���'ÿ��ÿ#�$�'��)�ÿ�'ÿ
(�**�#(��ÿ%$�$ÿ$��%�'ÿ/�ÿ
* ������'ÿ���!ÿ0#���ÿ1�#���ÿ��ÿ
&amp;#�$�#2�ÿ���ÿ$* ��,��3�ÿ$(��ÿ�'ÿ
(�#(��#ÿ��ÿ���ÿ(�**%���4-ÿ���ÿ
0#���ÿ1�#���ÿ#�ÿ�$ÿ&amp;&amp;#�&amp;#���ÿ��#ÿ
��(#�$�'ÿ#����ÿ��ÿ���ÿ5#$�ÿ6��#7ÿ
3���ÿ#�$�'��)�ÿ/�2�-ÿ.$ÿ���ÿ
/��(�ÿ��ÿ#�$�'��)�ÿ�'ÿ
(�**�#(��ÿ%$�$ÿ(��)�%�$ÿ��ÿ
�2��2�7ÿ�$$%�$ÿ$%(�ÿ$ÿ&amp;#8��!7ÿ
$�!�$7ÿ�'ÿ���ÿ�2�#��ÿ(�#(��#ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ���!�/�#���'ÿ$��%�'ÿ/�ÿ
(��)�%��4ÿ*�����#�'ÿ�'ÿ
''#�$$�'ÿ��#�%!�ÿ9����!-ÿ
:�2���&amp;*���ÿ��ÿ���ÿ'�$�#�(�ÿ$��%�'ÿ
/�ÿ&amp;�'�$�#��,�#�����'ÿ3���ÿ$��ÿ
%��,�#�����'ÿ((�$$-ÿ

345467ÿ9 ÿ�7ÿ
�7����7 �� �ÿ
���ÿ������ÿ��ÿ���ÿK�!��ÿL�'%$�#��ÿ
'�$�#�(�ÿ�$ÿ��ÿ((�**�'��ÿ�+�$)�!ÿ
��!��ÿ��'%$�#��ÿ%$�$7ÿ�'ÿ��ÿ
��(�%#!�ÿ�'ÿ&amp;#�2�'�ÿ
�&amp;&amp;�#�%��)�$ÿ��#ÿ''�)���ÿ��!��ÿ
��'%$�#47ÿ��(�%'��!ÿ3����$��ÿ�'ÿ
3 #���%$��!ÿ%$�$ÿ$ÿ3���ÿ$ÿ
()2�)�$ÿ��8�ÿ#�$�#(�ÿ�/�#��#��$7ÿ
��!�,��(�ÿ��'%$�#��$7ÿ��!��ÿ$$�*/�4ÿ
�&amp;�#)��$7ÿ�N(�ÿ$&amp;(�7ÿ�'ÿ
(�**�#(��ÿ%$�$ÿ���ÿ$%&amp;&amp;�#�ÿ��!��ÿ
��'%$�#��ÿ()2�)�$-ÿ.()2�)�$ÿ
$��%�'ÿ���ÿ(#���ÿ$*�8�7ÿ!$7ÿ
�'�#7ÿ'%$�7ÿ���$�7ÿ�#ÿ����#ÿ
��2�#��*����ÿ�*&amp;(�$ÿ/�4��'ÿ���ÿ
&amp;#�&amp;�#�4-ÿL*&amp;(�$ÿ��ÿ�4ÿ��!��ÿ
��'%$�#��ÿ()2�)�$ÿÿ$��%�'ÿ/�ÿ
*�)!��'ÿ�'ÿ$����'�'ÿ�#�*ÿ
$%##�%�'��!ÿ&amp;#�&amp;�#)�$-ÿ
:�2���&amp;*���ÿ��ÿ���ÿ'�$�#�(�ÿ$��%�'ÿ
/�ÿ'�$�!��'ÿ3���ÿ*�$%#�$ÿ��ÿ
��$%#�ÿ&amp;&amp;#�&amp;#���ÿ2���(%�#ÿ
((�$$7ÿO#()2�ÿ/%��'��!ÿ�('�$7ÿ
&lt;=&gt;?@ÿBCDEF@G=HIÿ
�'ÿ$�!��5(��ÿ��'$(&amp;��!ÿ��ÿ
���ÿK�!��ÿL�'%$�#��ÿ'�$�#�(�ÿ��(�%'�$ÿ $����'ÿ�*&amp;(�$ÿ��ÿ�4ÿ��!��ÿ
��'%$�#��ÿ()2�)�$ÿ�#�*ÿ
&amp;#�&amp;�#)�$ÿ���ÿ#�ÿ(%##����4ÿ
2(��ÿ�#ÿ#�ÿ��*�ÿ��ÿ!#�(%��%#�ÿ $%##�%�'��!ÿ&amp;#�&amp;�#)�$-ÿÿÿ
&amp;#�(�$$��!M'�$�#�/%)��ÿ()2�)�$-ÿÿÿ
01ÿ

�ÿÿÿÿÿÿeEffO*F']ÿT)QF(FU&amp;,gÿD&amp;4hFQ&amp;,gÿ)*+ÿNOP(FQÿi)*+ÿ
ÿ

3ÿ5675ÿ89 6ÿ��ÿ6��ÿ��ÿ� ��ÿ
������ÿ6�ÿ��ÿ��ÿ5�ÿ�6�66ÿ��ÿ
��89 �ÿ��ÿ���6��ÿ����9�6ÿ
����6����ÿ���� 6� 6���ÿ�����ÿ
�����ÿ��ÿ�9�6�ÿ�96�6�7�ÿ�9����ÿ
�6�!�7ÿ���6����ÿ��ÿ���ÿ5�ÿ" ÿ
���ÿ�99��ÿ6�������ÿ��ÿ

����������ÿÿÿ
%&amp;'()*+,ÿ

-5�ÿ.6 7�ÿ��ÿ/��6��ÿ���������ÿ
5���ÿ6���� �ÿ"� ��ÿ����ÿ
-5���ÿ����9����ÿ����6��ÿ"6�6��ÿ
5�6 �ÿ�����ÿ7��9��" ��0
��6��6�7ÿ" ���ÿ1 ��ÿ��9 ��ÿ
����ÿ�9����ÿ�9��2�ÿ�������ÿ
�����!�� ÿ� 9�ÿ��ÿ5��ÿ6�ÿ5�ÿ
������!��ÿ��ÿ�6!7!��ÿ��ÿ
3���6�7�ÿÿ�� ���ÿ��ÿ�6��76� ÿ
�6�5ÿ��ÿ�6�����ÿ� ���ÿ�ÿ�������ÿ
� ��ÿ��ÿ�6� �ÿ6�ÿ5�6�ÿ� 9�ÿ
5�6 �ÿÿ

%)'&amp;45%),'&amp;6)'&amp;4ÿ

/��6��ÿ6�ÿ������ÿ"65ÿÿ�9�6�ÿ" ��ÿ
�����ÿ3ÿ788�888�7 ��ÿ
9����7��9��ÿ�����ÿ�������6�ÿ
���7�ÿ��ÿ6�ÿ�� ��ÿ��95ÿ��ÿ5�ÿ
.6 7�ÿ��ÿ9�:�ÿ7��������ÿ
������ �ÿ;�9�ÿ"��ÿ������ ÿ
����6��ÿ5�ÿ����9�6&lt;ÿ�ÿ=8ÿ7 ��ÿ
���ÿ�6�9�ÿ"�ÿÿ5�ÿ�9�6�ÿ���5�ÿ
ÿ&gt;8ÿ7 ��ÿ���ÿ�6�9�ÿ��ÿÿ78?ÿ
7 ��ÿ���ÿ�6�9�ÿ"�ÿÿ:5 �ÿ
@���ÿ��ÿA?8ÿ7 ��ÿ���ÿ�6�9�ÿ
"�ÿ��7ÿB�AAÿ���5�ÿÿ3ÿ�������ÿ
��5ÿ���6�����ÿ��ÿ�9�6����ÿ5�ÿ6�ÿ
�"�ÿ��6� �ÿ���!�ÿ��6�ÿ1��ÿ�ÿ
�6�����ÿ��ÿ��" 7��ÿ"65ÿ5�ÿ
����!��ÿ��ÿ5�ÿC�"ÿ
C�675���5���ÿ"56�5ÿ6�ÿ������ÿ�ÿ

�����ÿ�� ÿ����9�6ÿ���!�ÿ
������ÿÿ

DE(F+ÿ%),'&amp;ÿ

:�6�ÿ" ��ÿ6�ÿ������ÿ�ÿ��6� �ÿ
59���ÿ��ÿ� ���ÿ6�ÿH��I�ÿJ��1ÿ
6�ÿ5�ÿB ��ÿK6ÿ���ÿÿ��6� � ÿ
�"���ÿ��1�ÿK���9�6ÿ
����6�7ÿ�9������ÿ��ÿ�� ��ÿÿ
5�ÿ��ÿ���ÿ��ÿ;6�5��ÿ:���ÿ�ÿ
����6��ÿ���� ��ÿ� ��6��ÿ-56�ÿ
��66ÿ" �ÿ�9����ÿ�ÿ5�ÿJ�� �9ÿ
K�9� ÿ����6�7ÿ���7���ÿÿ

LF(()M&amp;ÿNOP(FQ5RO),FSNOP(FQÿ
T)QF(FU&amp;,ÿ

V���ÿA?8ÿ����ÿ��ÿ��ÿ��ÿ������ÿ
�ÿ�9�6�089�6��9�6�ÿ��66!��ÿ��ÿ
����ÿ����ÿ������!���ÿ-5���ÿ
6��9��ÿ5�ÿ@��ÿV����ÿH��ÿJ��ÿ
K���9�6ÿJ6����ÿ-�"��56�ÿW �ÿ
;6��ÿX������ÿ��66!���ÿ@9�6�ÿ
�����ÿ� 6������ÿ7�7��ÿ.6 7�ÿ
V����ÿ5�ÿ/��6��ÿ3��ÿW6���6�ÿ
B9��9��ÿ5�ÿ:���6�7ÿY��ÿX9���ÿ
C !�� ÿJ���5���ÿZ6��9�6�7ÿÿ
.6�6��ÿK����ÿ�� ��ÿ��ÿ��6� �ÿ
������ ÿ����ÿ�ÿ5�ÿ;����ÿ
H��������[�ÿ.6 7�ÿ��� ���ÿ��ÿ
����ÿ�����ÿ�ÿ"�ÿ�ÿ5�ÿ� 9�ÿ
��ÿ�"���ÿ�ÿ5�ÿJ�� �9ÿ
K���������ÿ-5�ÿ�9��9�ÿ" �ÿ
�� �6�5��ÿ�ÿ5�ÿ/��6��ÿW6���6�ÿ
:��6� ÿ��ÿ6�ÿ��ÿ��ÿ����ÿ�ÿ
/��6��ÿ-�"��56�ÿ��ÿJK����ÿÿ

NOP(FQÿD)\&amp;']ÿ

-5�ÿJ�� �9ÿK�9� ÿ:5��62^�ÿ
X������ÿ����6���ÿ��6��ÿ
�����!��ÿ���ÿ5�ÿ.6 7��ÿÿ-5�ÿH��ÿ
J��ÿ;6��ÿ��ÿ_���9�ÿX������ÿ
01ÿ

ZHJ;X[�ÿ6�ÿÿA`ÿ5�9�ÿÿ� �ÿ�����ÿ
� �ÿÿ"���ÿ����6���ÿ� 2��ÿ�ÿÿ
�9�!��ÿ�56��ÿ��ÿ� 2ÿ
�9��������ÿ�ÿÿ�� ÿ
���!�7��ÿ��ÿ���!��ÿ���������ÿ
3ÿX������ÿ�������ÿ��ÿ
���!1��ÿB6�567�ÿ1��175���ÿ��0
������ÿ��ÿ6������ÿ�ÿ�65��ÿ
�����6��ÿZ/B-�@[ÿ��ÿ��6�ÿ
����7���ÿ���6� ÿ��5�6�6��ÿ
Z/B-�Y[�ÿ-5�ÿX������ÿ���� ��ÿ
����ÿ"�ÿ� !���aÿ5�ÿ@9�6�ÿ:�� ÿ
Y96�6�7�ÿ�� ��ÿÿb`87ÿ��ÿ: �ÿ
:���ÿ6�ÿH��ÿ3�����ÿ6�ÿ� 2��ÿ�9�
!��ÿ"65ÿ���ÿ�����6�ÿ��ÿ5���ÿ
1��175��0ÿ/B-�Y�&lt;ÿ-5�ÿ;6��ÿ: !��ÿ
6�ÿ/��6���ÿ�� ��ÿÿ77c?8ÿJK����ÿ
6�ÿ� 2��ÿ�9�!��ÿ"65ÿ"�ÿ
1��175��0/B-��ÿ:56dÿ� ��7ÿ6�ÿ
97�����ÿ�9�6�7ÿ5�ÿ����ÿ
�9����ÿ���5�ÿ��ÿ��������ÿ��ÿ
�896����ÿ����ÿ�65��ÿ��ÿ��5ÿ
� !���ÿ"6ÿ�������ÿ�ÿ� �ÿ
���� � ÿ��ÿ�7�5���ÿ������6�7ÿ
��ÿ5�ÿ� 9��ÿ��ÿ��!��ÿ��ÿ��5ÿ
6��6����ÿ-5�ÿ;6��ÿ��ÿ_���9�ÿ
X������ÿ����6���ÿ3������ÿJ6��ÿ
:9����ÿZ3J:[ÿ���6� ÿ����6����ÿ
6��9�6�7ÿ�������ÿ1��ÿ175!�7ÿ
����6����ÿ��56��ÿ� �6�!���ÿ5675ÿ
�7�ÿ����9�ÿÿ5�ÿX9����ÿ����5ÿ
��ÿ����9��ÿ�9�ÿ��" ÿ����ÿ
� �6��ÿ����9�ÿ��ÿ1��ÿ175!�7ÿ���ÿ
H��ÿJ��ÿ��ÿJ��ÿB6�567�ÿ6�ÿ
�����6�!��ÿ"65ÿ5�ÿ9�:�ÿK��ÿ
H9���ÿÿ
-5�ÿC !�� ÿ@��ÿ��ÿ��������ÿ�ÿ
�9�6�ÿ��� ÿ�69!���ÿ6��9�6�7ÿ
���ÿ�����������ÿ
ÿ

�ÿ

345678945 96ÿ

��ÿ��������ÿ������ÿ��ÿ������ÿ
��������ÿ�ÿ�����������ÿ�� ���!ÿ
"��#�ÿ����ÿ�����#���ÿ�$���%ÿ�&amp;��ÿ
��ÿ����ÿ�����'��ÿ����������'�(�ÿ
���ÿ�)�'��ÿ����ÿ��������*��ÿ
���#��%ÿ������#ÿ���+�ÿ��������ÿ'�##ÿ
��ÿ���ÿ���&amp;��ÿ���ÿ,�##���ÿ��ÿ
����*-��ÿ.(ÿ���ÿ,�##���/�ÿ������#(ÿ
�������ÿ���������*��ÿ0#��!ÿÿ
2����ÿ3���'�(�ÿ4�55ÿ���ÿ4�65ÿ
���������ÿ��ÿ���ÿ������ÿ��ÿ7����ÿ
2�����ÿ���ÿ8�9���ÿ2�����!ÿ3���'�(ÿ
4�55ÿ���:����ÿ���ÿ������(ÿ�����ÿ
���ÿ��&amp;��ÿ������ÿ����ÿ���ÿ
����&amp;���(ÿ���ÿ4�65ÿ��ÿ���ÿ������(ÿ
#��)ÿ��ÿ�������ÿ8��#���&amp;ÿ9�&amp;��(ÿ���ÿ
���ÿ��:����ÿ9��(ÿ����ÿ��ÿ���ÿ����!ÿÿ
��ÿ�+���#ÿ;��ÿ&lt;=ÿ������ÿ��:�����(ÿ
���'�ÿ=!&gt;5ÿ��#��ÿ��ÿ��?��ÿ�������ÿ
���ÿ'���ÿ���ÿ������ÿ����*��ÿ��ÿ
8��.)��ÿ8���ÿ��ÿ���ÿ,�##���ÿ������ÿ
���'��)ÿ�����ÿ���ÿ�����$�����#(ÿ
&lt;!&lt;@ÿ��#��ÿ��ÿ#���#ÿ�������%ÿ�#���ÿ
'���ÿ=!AAÿ��#��ÿ��ÿ2����ÿ3���'�(�ÿ
'�����ÿ���ÿ,�##���!ÿ2����ÿ3���'�(ÿ
���+�ÿ��&amp;���ÿ��:�ÿ��*�����ÿ
�:�����ÿ���#(ÿ���+�ÿB;C Dÿ��ÿ���ÿ
�'�ÿ2����ÿ3���'�(�!ÿ4�55ÿ��&amp;��ÿ��ÿ
4�65ÿ�������ÿ=%&gt;@@ÿ;C !ÿ4�55ÿ
�����ÿ��ÿ��'�ÿ���ÿ��ÿ;C ÿ��ÿ5%5@@ÿ
�����!ÿ4�65ÿ����ÿ��ÿ��'�ÿ���ÿ��ÿ;C ÿ
��ÿ5%=@@!ÿÿ
��ÿ����ÿ���������'�(ÿ���&amp;���ÿ��ÿ
��ÿ��*�����ÿ5=ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ2����ÿ
0�����(ÿ3���'�(�%ÿE&lt;ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ#���#ÿ
�������%ÿ����ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ��?��ÿ�������%ÿ
���ÿ�'�ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ�&amp;.#��ÿ�##�(�!ÿF�ÿ�##%ÿ
G6ÿ�����ÿ��ÿ=E!6ÿ�������ÿ��ÿ���ÿ
,�##���ÿ����ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ��:����ÿ��ÿ
������ÿ���������'�(!ÿÿ

^_`àbcÿefgcÿahiÿjckalmnchmÿopÿqrs`_gÿtoluvÿ

H96IJ994KLMNÿ345678945 96ÿ YK4ÿ345678945 96ÿ

;ÿ�&amp;�.��ÿ��ÿ����������P��ÿ
����������*��ÿ�(�����ÿ�$���ÿ'�����ÿ
���ÿ����ÿ���ÿ,�##���!ÿF�ÿ����*��ÿ��ÿ
�ÿ���'��)ÿ��ÿ����'�#)�ÿ'�����ÿ���ÿ
,�##���%ÿ���ÿ2#������ÿQ���ÿ3�������ÿ
���#%ÿ�ÿ�&amp;#*�����#ÿ����#ÿ����ÿ
�$�����ÿ����&amp;��ÿ���ÿR�*���#ÿ0��)ÿ
��ÿ9#�:�#���ÿ�'�����%ÿ���#&amp;���ÿ�ÿ
��&amp;��ÿ����&amp;��ÿ���ÿ,�##���!ÿ��ÿ
4�������ÿ2��������2����ÿ������ÿ���ÿ
��)���ÿ����#ÿ��##�'�ÿ��ÿ�.�������ÿ
���#����ÿ���������'�(ÿ��ÿ���ÿ����ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ,�##���%ÿ'���ÿ������*���ÿ��ÿ���ÿ
����&amp;��ÿ���ÿ,�##���!ÿ��ÿ��&amp;��ÿ&amp;���ÿ
���ÿR������ÿ���ÿ7����ÿ2�����ÿ������
���'�(ÿ���ÿ���ÿ��&amp;��ÿ����ÿ��ÿ4�65!ÿÿ

STUVKWÿ345678945 96ÿ

��ÿ"�##���ÿQ!ÿQ�#���ÿ;������ÿ��ÿ
�'���ÿ?����#(ÿ.(ÿ���ÿ,�##���ÿ��ÿ
������ÿ���ÿ������ÿ�'�����!ÿF�ÿ��ÿ
�������ÿ.(ÿ���ÿ������ÿ;������ÿ
;&amp;������(%ÿ'���ÿ����������*:��ÿ
����ÿ.���ÿ���ÿ,�##���ÿ���ÿ
�'�����!ÿ��ÿ�������ÿ���:��ÿ���ÿ
������#ÿ������ÿ����ÿ'���ÿ�������%ÿ
�&amp;�'�(ÿ#�����%ÿ*����'��%ÿ���ÿ��ÿ
����������*:�ÿ.&amp;�#����!ÿ��ÿ�������ÿ
��ÿ#������ÿ�����ÿ��#��ÿ����ÿ��ÿ���ÿ
,�##���ÿ���ÿ�'�ÿ��#��ÿ��&amp;��ÿ��ÿ
Q��P����ÿ���#!ÿ
9��������#ÿ���ÿ���:���ÿ���ÿ���ÿ
������ÿ��ÿ���:����ÿ�������#(ÿ.(ÿ���ÿ
9����(ÿ9�����#ÿ;������%ÿ#������ÿ��ÿ
��:����ÿ9��(!ÿ

ÿ

;.�&amp;�ÿ����ÿB\Dÿ�����ÿ��ÿ���ÿ,�##���ÿ
B=!&lt;]Dÿ���ÿ��������P��ÿ��ÿ
���*�&amp;*���#ÿ��ÿ�&amp;.#��ÿ&amp;���!ÿ��ÿ
,�##���ÿ�+��ÿ���ÿC���������ÿ��ÿ
0&amp;.#��ÿ"��)�ÿ��ÿ#������ÿ��ÿ8�9���ÿ
2�����!ÿÿ��ÿ������ÿ�'�����ÿ3�##ÿ��ÿ
#������ÿ��ÿ7����ÿ2�����%ÿ'����ÿ
���:����ÿ���������ÿ����&amp;���(ÿ

��ÿ,�##���ÿ��ÿ���:��ÿ.(ÿ�ÿ���#�������ÿ
.&amp;�ÿ�(����ÿ����ÿ��)��ÿ-:�ÿ��&amp;��ÿ
�����ÿ���#(ÿ.��'���ÿ������ÿ���ÿ
��:����ÿ9��(!ÿQ&amp;�ÿ���:���ÿ��ÿ
���:����ÿ.(ÿ���ÿQ�(ÿ;���ÿ
���������*��ÿ;&amp;������(ÿBQ; ;D%ÿ
'����ÿ���:��ÿX����ÿ��:����ÿ���ÿ
8��#���&amp;ÿ9�&amp;�*��!ÿ
01ÿ

STUVKWÿZTKVNK6[7ÿ

�ÿ

4 ��6ÿ�+ÿ�4ÿ��ÿ�6ÿ�4ÿ+9��ÿ�+ÿ
$%&amp;a�ÿ)6ÿ)���4�ÿ$bÿ$%&amp;aÿ�4ÿ&gt;���974ÿ
���6���ÿ+��39���ÿ9��4�4ÿ�4ÿc9 4ÿ
c94�ÿ���ÿ+��3ÿ�4ÿ��33�`44ÿ96ÿ
d�696�3����ÿ97�44ÿ�ÿ�4ÿ��46ÿ�ÿ
96�ÿ�4��6ÿ��ÿ��796�=95�6ÿ!��ÿ��34ÿ
�4+��4ÿ�4ÿ���6���ÿ!��ÿ9ÿ�9��4ÿ!4��(
��6�4�4ÿ��96ÿ�ÿ���67ÿ�4��e�ÿ
4��6�3��ÿD��334���9�Eÿ��ÿ�4�4659�ÿ
uvwxyvxÿ{|}~ÿ{|vxÿvxÿÿwÿ}ÿvxyÿÿ
!9 4�ÿ!94�ÿ��4fgÿÿG�����ÿ�6��ÿ96ÿ
344567ÿ96ÿ446ÿ�9�4�ÿ���ÿ���94ÿI����796ÿ���4��64ÿ�49��ÿ96ÿ�4ÿ I9 4�ÿG�96ÿ��33�`44ÿ��� ��6ÿ
�6ÿ���6ÿ��44ÿ�ÿ�4ÿ��46ÿ�9�4ÿ
44�ÿÿÿ!��4ÿ�����4ÿ�ÿ�4ÿÿÿÿÿÿ ����7���ÿ�4ÿ44���346ÿ�+ÿ�4ÿ
��33�6��ÿ����9��ÿ!����ÿ�ÿ4ÿ�ÿ ���ÿ3� ÿ�4ÿ��44�4ÿ�ÿ39�69�6ÿ $%&amp;'ÿI9 4�ÿG�96ÿ�465e4ÿN�45�6ÿ
�64�7�ÿ9ÿ39"��ÿ4#�96��6ÿ�6ÿ$%&amp;'( �4ÿ�49��ÿ�+ÿH3���4Oÿ69��9�ÿ4P67�ÿÿ96ÿ��4ÿ�4�94ÿ�ÿ9ÿ!9 4ÿ!94�ÿ
$%$%�ÿ)�4�ÿ�65�5�69�ÿ�4ÿ�6���4ÿ
� 43ÿ�6����67ÿ�� ÿ�3�9�ÿ�6ÿ
�4ÿ���4ÿ*9��ÿ9��67ÿ!��ÿ9ÿ6�3�4�ÿ�+ÿ
44���346ÿ96ÿ��33�6��ÿ������ÿÿ
������4�ÿÿ

-./01.2ÿ415.6ÿ.78ÿ9.1:6ÿ

Q66056ÿ.78ÿ
RSST1/07UV56ÿ

W1.XYÿ.78ÿ95856/1U.7ÿZ.[5/\ÿ

i0/015ÿj.78ÿk65ÿ

l5m52TSn57/ÿoT76U851.VT76ÿ
&lt;4��4ÿ�ÿ39��ÿ�=4ÿ�4ÿ&gt;���974ÿ�ÿ &lt;���67ÿ�4ÿ�334�ÿ3�6� ÿ
��34ÿ�ÿ9ÿ!49��ÿ�+ÿ69��9�ÿ9�49ÿ96ÿ��6745�6ÿ�����ÿ9��67ÿ�4ÿ���39��ÿ @ÿ &lt;44���346ÿ����ÿ�4ÿ
�9�� ÿ�6����67?ÿ
��6�46ÿ!��ÿH3���4Oÿ
94ÿ��7�!9�ÿ96ÿ�4��ÿ39"��ÿ
������ÿ��9�9�4�ÿ96ÿ4#�567ÿ
@ÿ �����4!9ÿB�6ÿC9��9�ÿ��49ÿ �64�4�5�6�ÿL�9]�ÿ��6745�6ÿÿÿÿÿÿ
D�44�969�ÿ��64�96��Eÿ
96ÿ�9���67ÿ�4�M�! ÿ��ÿ���974ÿÿÿÿÿ �����67ÿ��4�ÿ
@ÿ F��6�6ÿG9��ÿÿDH3���4ÿ���6ÿ����Eÿ �4��ÿ+��3ÿ�4ÿ7��!�67ÿ6�3�4�ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ @ÿ ��4!9��ÿ��ÿ��4�ÿ6�6(3����=4ÿ
�+ÿ�9�ÿ96ÿ�4��495�69�ÿ4����4ÿ��67ÿ �96���95�6ÿ��5�6ÿ����ÿ
@ÿ �9�4ÿI����796ÿJ49��ÿG9��ÿ
�4ÿ�!6�!6ÿ96ÿ�49��ÿ9�49�ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ��664�ÿ��334���9�ÿ�4ÿ�ÿ
�4�4659�ÿ9�49 ÿ�9�� ÿ96ÿ��4�ÿ
@ÿ ��9�9ÿG9��ÿ
�ÿ�4ÿC95�69�ÿG9��ÿ96ÿ&gt;���974ÿÿÿÿ
64�7������� �ÿÿ
4#�4��46�4ÿ�6��494ÿ��95�6ÿ
@ÿ &gt;���974ÿC9��4ÿG�44�4ÿ
�44 ��96ÿ��ÿ6�6(3����=4ÿ���4ÿ @ÿ G�����ÿ�4ÿ��ÿ9�5�54ÿ���ÿ9ÿ
@ÿ ��44��67ÿJ49�ÿ&lt;�64ÿC95�69�ÿ �
��33�6��ÿ446 ÿ9�4ÿ
�9�4���4ÿDK�ÿC95�69�ÿG9��ÿ 4��34ÿ3��4ÿ�3���96�ÿÿÿ
46����974p4�4��9���ÿ���67ÿ�4ÿ
^.6/5ÿ^./51ÿQ7[1.6/10Y/015ÿ
�4���4Eÿ
d����4�ÿ49�6fgÿ
L
�
4
ÿ
&gt;
�
�
�
9
7
4
ÿ
�
�
�
�
4
6
�
�
ÿ
�
4
ÿ
6
�
ÿ
�
9
4
ÿ
9
ÿ
L�44ÿ�9��ÿ96ÿ�4��ÿ9346�54 ÿ
69�ÿ+49��4ÿ
9��67ÿ!��ÿ7�9�ÿ96ÿ��"4�54ÿ 3�6����9�ÿD��33�6��Eÿ96�9��ÿ4!4�ÿ@ÿ ��4�6���5ÿ�44ÿ4ÿ�6�����46�34
+��ÿ49��ÿ�9��ÿ9�4ÿ49��4ÿ�6ÿ�4ÿ � 43ÿ!����ÿ39�ÿ�4ÿ9ÿ��3�567ÿ+9���ÿ 96ÿ46�96�4�ÿ 4 ÿ��44�4 ÿ
&gt;���974ÿ�+ÿH3���4ÿB4��495�6ÿG�96�ÿÿ �ÿ��334���9�ÿ96ÿ�34ÿ�4�4659�ÿ
6ÿ�6ÿ�4ÿ q5Y15.VT7r9.1:2.78ÿ
�46�54ÿ46���63469�ÿ+49��4ÿÿÿÿ &gt;7�����9!74��ÿÿ9L6�4ÿÿÿ&gt;�4��947�4�ÿ���34
��64ÿ9ÿ L�4ÿB4��495�6sG9���96ÿ����ÿ
���ÿ9ÿ�4ÿ94(4�7694ÿ���5�9�ÿ +��39�ÿ!9 4ÿ!94�ÿ+433�
�96ÿ&lt;�64ÿ��49 ÿ�4ÿ���4�4ÿM��9ÿ �����ÿ�+ÿ$%&amp;_ÿ96ÿ9ÿ&gt;���997��4�ÿ�+�4�9ÿ��������ÿ�ÿ6ÿ�6���4ÿ����4��ÿ�6ÿ�4ÿ6���49 ÿ
96ÿ+9�69ÿ�4ÿ!���96 ÿ�6ÿ�4ÿ49 ÿ ��ÿ��33�`44ÿ!9ÿ+��34�ÿK��6ÿ ���64�ÿ�+ÿ�4ÿ&gt;���974tÿ9��67ÿ�4ÿ
�4ÿ�+ÿ����ÿJ9�ÿ�9�4ÿ96ÿ�6ÿ�4ÿ ��3��45�6ÿ�+ÿ��ÿ4#����9���ÿ��ÿ ���4�6ÿ&gt;���974ÿ���69��tÿ96ÿ9��67ÿ
6���49 ÿN�9�4�ÿ�+ÿ�4ÿ&gt;���974ÿ�4ÿ �4ÿ&gt;���974ÿ���6���ÿ�4�ÿ��44ÿ�4�4!ÿ �4ÿ���ÿ46ÿ�+ÿ����ÿJ9�ÿ�9�4�ÿ
�64ÿ!4 ÿÿ�+ÿ�9�4ÿ��ÿ�4ÿ�9�4ÿ
01ÿ

�ÿ

234356ÿ89 ÿ 6ÿ
�6����6 9�� ÿ

���ÿ������������!"��#ÿ��$�%��&amp;ÿ'(ÿ
#�('%��#ÿ$�ÿ����))�#�$�ÿ�*'(��%ÿ
���������ÿ+��+��$&amp;,ÿ����(ÿ-��ÿ-.$.��ÿ
���������ÿ.(�,ÿ��ÿ�$���ÿ(��('�/�ÿ
��(�.���ÿ����(0ÿ��'(ÿ"��#ÿ.(�ÿ��$�%��&amp;ÿ
1'""ÿ�""�1ÿ-��ÿ"�12'�$��('$&amp;ÿ���������ÿ
#�/�"�+)��$,ÿ�(ÿ1�""ÿ�(ÿ"�12#��('$&amp;ÿ
��('#����"ÿ.(�(ÿ���('($��$ÿ1'$�ÿ
����������"ÿ��#ÿ���(��/����ÿ.(�(0ÿ
���ÿ������������!"��#ÿ��$�%��&amp;ÿ
'����+���$�(ÿ4"��+'�%ÿ5���ÿ6.��(ÿ
7�����"ÿ8�!�(����ÿ+��+��$&amp;0ÿ��'(ÿ
+.9"'�ÿ+��+��$&amp;ÿ'(ÿ�ÿ�'%�"&amp;2/�".�#ÿ�((�$ÿ
-��ÿ$��ÿ��('#��$(,ÿ9.('��((�(,ÿ��#ÿ
/'('$��(,ÿ��#ÿ'$ÿ'(ÿ$��ÿ:'""�%�;(ÿ'�$�����ÿ
$�ÿ1��!ÿ���+����/�"&amp;ÿ1'$�ÿ$��ÿ��!ÿ
4��/'��0ÿ&lt;"(�ÿ'��".#�#ÿ'�ÿ$�'(ÿ��$�%��&amp;ÿ
'(ÿ$��ÿ:'""�%�2�1��#ÿ9�����+��!ÿ��ÿ
8�!�ÿ='��'%��,ÿ�(ÿ1�""ÿ�(ÿ&gt;���(��ÿ��!ÿ
��#ÿ4��"#�ÿ��!,ÿ��#ÿ$��ÿ?�'++�1�ÿ
�.�ÿ+��(��/�,ÿ�1��#ÿ��#ÿ+��$��$�#ÿ
9&amp;ÿ$��ÿ8��"���.ÿ?��(��/���&amp;0ÿ
6�/�"�+)��$ÿ'�ÿ��ÿ.(�ÿ�-ÿ$��ÿ
������������!"��#ÿ"��#ÿ.(�ÿ��$�%��&amp;ÿ
(��."#ÿ9�ÿ���('($��$ÿ1'$�ÿ$��ÿ:'""�%�;(ÿ
���������ÿ"��ÿ%��"(,ÿ'��".#'�%ÿ$��ÿ
%��"ÿ$�ÿ@+��/'#�ÿ��#ÿ)�'�$�'�ÿ
��)).�'$&amp;ÿ��#ÿ���������ÿ"��#(ÿ��#ÿ
-��'"'��(ÿ-��ÿ(�-�ÿ����((ÿ��#ÿ
��A�&amp;)��$ÿ9&amp;ÿ��('#��$(ÿ��#ÿ/'('$��(0Bÿ
�')��&amp;ÿ.(�(ÿ+��+�(�#ÿ'�ÿ$��ÿ
������������!"��#ÿ����ÿ'��".#�ÿ
+.9"'�ÿ��#ÿ+�'/�$�ÿ-���($�&amp;,ÿ1'"#"'-�ÿ
��9'$�$,ÿ+��!(ÿ��#ÿ���������,ÿ�(ÿ1�""ÿ
�(ÿ(')'"��ÿ�+��ÿ(+���ÿ.(�(0ÿ4����#��&amp;ÿ
.(�(ÿ'��".#�ÿ"�12#��('$&amp;ÿ��('#����"ÿ
#�/�"�+)��$0ÿ

00ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

*+,-./0ÿ23ÿÿ
567689:ÿ;8,&lt;7:ÿ=ÿ&gt;?@/ABC/7ÿ

345ÿ78ÿ95ÿ84 �549�ÿ�7�5�ÿ78ÿÿ
� �95�ÿ��4ÿ��ÿ97ÿ��7��5ÿÿ��5���49ÿ
87�ÿ95ÿ89�5�ÿ9�7�ÿ95ÿ
5�9�����549ÿ78ÿÿ����74�ÿ�7���ÿ4ÿ
7��5���5��ÿ�ÿ����74ÿ��ÿÿÿ�74��95��ÿ
��5 ÿ78ÿ95ÿ�7�� 4�9!�ÿ ��5ÿ�7��ÿ
��7��5ÿ�545��ÿ��5��74ÿ4ÿ�5��5ÿ
�ÿÿ5������74ÿ78ÿ95ÿ5���5ÿ
89�5�ÿ"5!ÿ �5��ÿ���5�ÿ4ÿ
��5��#�ÿ455��ÿ�9ÿ�5ÿ��7 ÿ�4ÿ
��7�5�ÿÿ3��5���5�ÿ�5ÿÿ94����5ÿ
�54�ÿ78ÿ��5��4�ÿ�7���ÿÿ
ÿ
"5ÿ����74�ÿ�7��ÿ4ÿ7��5���5�ÿ�4ÿ
9��ÿ� �95�ÿ�5ÿ�49545ÿ97ÿ��5ÿ
89�5ÿ5�5�7��549�ÿ�7���!ÿ
�4����5��ÿ4ÿ795�ÿ�����5�ÿ�4ÿÿ
� 445�ÿ9 9ÿ�5%5�9�ÿ95ÿ
�7�� 4�9!&amp;�ÿ��5�ÿ4ÿ���7���5��ÿÿ
Dÿ ÿ

STUVÿXYZ[Vÿ\VYTTVÿÿYTV]^_ÿU`ZaUÿ

"5�5ÿ�7��ÿ5�5ÿ5�5�7�5ÿ��4�ÿ ���549ÿ�74��74��ÿ�ÿ�����5ÿ�4ÿ
95ÿ� �95�ÿ��4ÿ'7���(55&amp;�ÿ4ÿ ��5��7�ÿ��4ÿ� �95���ÿÿÿ
�����ÿ�4�9�ÿ��5��7��!ÿ 7�95ÿ
��4�ÿ4ÿ�9 �5��ÿ4ÿ4�!���ÿ78ÿ

F���74�ÿG7���ÿ3��5���5��ÿHÿ���74�ÿ

I4ÿ7�5�ÿ97ÿ���7���95�!ÿ ��4��95�ÿ�7���ÿ7��5���5�ÿ4ÿ�9�95��5�J 4ÿ97ÿ54��5ÿ9 9ÿ��7��5��ÿ��ÿ�5�4�ÿ� 5ÿ
97 ��ÿ95ÿ�7�� 4�9!&amp;�ÿ����74J�9&amp;�ÿ���7�949ÿ97ÿ45��94ÿ95ÿ�7�5�ÿ78ÿ5�ÿ4ÿ95��ÿ�5��74���ÿ97ÿ5�ÿ795��ÿÿ
ÿ
Dÿ Kÿ
567689ÿ��ÿÿ���9�5ÿ78ÿ 5�5ÿ7�ÿ 9ÿ95ÿ�7�� 4�9!ÿ 49�ÿ97ÿ�5ÿ�4ÿ95ÿ89�5�ÿÿÿ
Dÿ ;8,&lt;
7ÿ��7��5ÿ�545��ÿ��5��74ÿ4ÿ�5��5ÿ�ÿÿ5������74ÿ78ÿ95ÿ5���5ÿ89�5�ÿ"5!ÿ �5��ÿ���5�ÿ4ÿ��5��#�ÿ
455��ÿ�9ÿ�5ÿ��7 ÿ�4ÿ��7�5�ÿÿÿ
Dÿ &gt;?@
/ABC/7ÿ�5ÿÿ�54�ÿ78ÿ��5��4�ÿ�7���ÿ4ÿ�5ÿ( �4��5�ÿÿ
Dÿ KAB89ÿL.0,./M6
/7ÿ�59ÿ87�9ÿ95ÿ��5��#��ÿ45�5���!ÿ97ÿ��7�����ÿ7��5���5��ÿ345ÿ�9�95�!ÿ���9ÿ�5ÿ�5ÿ97ÿ
��7�����ÿ� ����5ÿ7��5���5�Nÿ7�ÿ4ÿ7��5���5ÿ���9ÿ�5O��5ÿ� ����5ÿ�9�95��5��ÿ���74ÿ�9�95��5�ÿ�54�8!ÿ
����5�549�74ÿ977��ÿP��ÿ�ÿQ74�4�ÿ� 4�5�Rÿ4ÿ95ÿ��!5��ÿ�4�7��5ÿ�4ÿ�55�4�ÿ�7��ÿ4ÿ7��5���5��ÿÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

345467ÿ9 67ÿ����ÿ

���ÿ�������ÿ��ÿ�� �!�ÿ!�"�#�$ÿ�%#ÿ!�$�!"�$ÿ�ÿ&amp;'���()ÿ��ÿ����ÿ��!ÿ�ÿ#�"�!$�ÿ�!�'ÿ��ÿ
!�$�#�%($ÿ�%#ÿ*'$�%�$$�$ÿ(��(ÿ!�+�,($ÿ(��ÿ�������-$ÿ'%�&amp;'�ÿ%�('!��ÿ�%"�!�%��%(ÿ
�%#ÿ$����ÿ"������ÿ�(��$��!�.ÿ/����ÿ!�+�,0%�ÿ�$(ÿ��$(�!)ÿ�%#ÿ�'!ÿ$����ÿ"������ÿ
"��'�$.ÿ�%#ÿ(�ÿ,!��(�ÿ�ÿ�������ÿ(��(ÿ�$ÿ�,�%���,���).ÿ�%"�!�%��%(���)ÿ�%#ÿ,'�('!���)ÿ
$'$(��%�*��1ÿ

3456ÿ89:;ÿ&lt;;=495ÿ&gt;?@AÿB9C4?ÿ

01ÿ
01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

Y����ÿZÿ34567896�ÿ[���ÿ\�6ÿZÿ]696����6��ÿ
34567896ÿÿ 6�696ÿ���ÿ6����76ÿ�����6ÿ7��������ÿ7���7�6ÿ���ÿ�6��6ÿ��ÿ���76ÿÿ
�78���ÿ
�ÿ !"#$#"%#ÿ'(#ÿ)"*#+,-./ÿ01*#'ÿ2+,ÿ$2)#ÿ2'34$5(#"#ÿ)41+,ÿ6*'(*+ÿ'(#ÿ74331+*'.ÿ
�ÿ !"434'#ÿ935*"#ÿ2$ÿ2ÿ62-:2;-#ÿ74331+*'.&lt;ÿÿ
�ÿ 9=5-4"#ÿ34,*&gt;72?4+$ÿ2+,ÿ23#+,3#+'ÿ4)ÿ'(#ÿ@*--2A#ÿ4)ÿ935*"#ÿB433#"7*2-ÿC#$*,#+?2-ÿDBCEÿF4+*+AÿG*$'"*7'ÿ'4ÿ
$#52"2'#/ÿ"#&gt;+#ÿ2+,ÿ#+(2+7#ÿ,#%#-453#+'ÿ$'2+,2",$ÿ6*'(*+ÿ'(#ÿ@*--2A#ÿ7433#"7*2-ÿ74"#/ÿ*&lt;#&lt;/ÿ2-4+AÿH"4+'ÿI'"##'ÿ
2+,ÿ6*'(*+ÿ'(#ÿ7433#"7*2-ÿ74""*,4"ÿ2-4+AÿJKLLÿM*A(62.&lt;ÿÿNÿ$2)#/ÿ5#,#$'"*2+K4"*#+'#,ÿ255"427(ÿ6*'(*+ÿ'(#ÿ
@*--2A#ÿ74"#ÿ2+,ÿ'(#ÿ$2)#ÿ5#,#$'"*2+ÿ2+,ÿ%#(*7-#K;2$#,ÿ'"2+$54"'2?4+ÿ6*'(*+ÿ'(#ÿJKLLÿ7433#"7*2-ÿ74""*,4"/ÿ2+,ÿ
'(#*"ÿ74++#7?%*'./ÿ$(41-,ÿA1*,#ÿ'(*$ÿ#O4"'&lt;ÿÿ
�ÿ !"#$#"%#ÿ'(#ÿ;#21'.ÿ4)ÿ'(#ÿ+2'1"2-ÿ#+%*"4+3#+'ÿ2+,ÿ'(#ÿ%*'2-*'.ÿ4)ÿ'(#ÿ,1+#ÿ2"#2$ÿ
�ÿ !"4'#7'ÿ62'#"ÿ012-*'.ÿP;4'(ÿA"41+,62'#"ÿ2+,ÿ$1")27#ÿ62'#"&lt;ÿÿ
�ÿ B4+?+1#ÿ2+,ÿ#=52+,ÿ74331+*'.ÿ5-2+?+Aÿ5"4A"23&lt;ÿ
�ÿ !"434'#ÿ'(#ÿ5"#$#"%2?4+ÿ2+,ÿ5"4'#7?4+ÿ4)ÿ(*$'4"*7ÿ$*'#$/ÿ;1*-,*+A$ÿ2+,ÿ)#2'1"#$ÿ*+ÿ'(#ÿ@*--2A#&lt;ÿ
�ÿ 9+741"2A#ÿ-472-ÿ74331+*'.ÿ(*$'4"*7ÿ5"#$#"%2?4+ÿ2+,ÿ*+'#"5"#'2?4+$ÿ5"4A"23$&lt;ÿ
�ÿ B4+$*,#"ÿQ4+*+Aÿ7(2+A#$ÿ'4ÿ*+7-1,#ÿ,#$*A+ÿ$'2+,2",$ÿ*+ÿ-*+#ÿ6*'(ÿ'(#ÿ@*--2A#R$ÿ(*$'4"*7ÿ7(2"27'#"ÿ2+,ÿ,#%#-453#+'ÿ
52S#"+$&lt;ÿ
�ÿ I#+$*?%#ÿ#+%*"4+3#+'2-ÿ"#$41"7#$ÿ*+7-1,*+Aÿ6#'-2+,$ÿ2+,ÿ62'#"ÿ012-*'.ÿ$(41-,ÿ;#ÿ5"4'#7'#,/ÿ5"#$#"%#,ÿ2+,ÿ
#+(2+7#,&lt;ÿÿ
�ÿ B4+$*,#"ÿ45?4+$ÿ2+,ÿJ9GBÿC#,#%#-453#+'ÿC#2,.ÿB4331+*?#$ÿ;#$'ÿ5"27?7#$ÿ'4ÿ32:#ÿQ4+*+Aÿ34"#ÿ1$#"K
)"*#+,-.ÿ2+,ÿ#T7*#+'&lt;ÿ
�ÿ B4+?+1#ÿ'4ÿ"#%*#6ÿ2+,ÿ15,2'#ÿ'(#ÿQ4+*+Aÿ4",*+2+7#ÿ2$ÿ+#7#$$2".&lt;ÿ
�ÿ B4+?+1#ÿ'4ÿ$1554"'ÿ'#$?+Aÿ2+,ÿ54$$*;-#ÿ"#3#,*2?4+ÿ4)ÿI41'(ÿU2"ÿV2:#ÿ2+,ÿ52"?7*52'#ÿ6*'(ÿ'(#ÿV##-2+21ÿB41+'.ÿ
B-#2+ÿW2'#"ÿX"415&lt;ÿÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ
ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ45678ÿ9ÿ ���8�ÿ�5�8���ÿ
����ÿ��5���ÿ�5�ÿ6ÿ�6��ÿ5�ÿ�5�8���ÿ���8ÿ8�!8ÿ6��ÿ��8�� 8ÿ�5ÿ�8��ÿ�5�8���ÿ5��5�8ÿ�5�ÿ677ÿ���5" 8ÿ6�#
8ÿ�5�8�57�ÿ8�!8ÿ6��ÿ6�7�� 8ÿ�5������ÿ�5ÿ��ÿ$�776�%8ÿ8"677ÿ�5&amp;�ÿ��6�6���ÿ
'��5�8�ÿ
(ÿ *+,-,+.,ÿ01,ÿ-234,ÿ356ÿ213+320,+ÿ78ÿ,9:-;5&lt;ÿ,-03=4:-1,6ÿ5,:&lt;1=7+1776-&gt;ÿÿ
(ÿ @9A47+,ÿA7--:=4,ÿA3+05,+-1:A-ÿB:01ÿ,CA47D,+-ÿ:5ÿ01,ÿ3+,3ÿ87+ÿ17E-:5&lt;ÿ3F7+63=4,ÿ07ÿ01,ÿ47234ÿB7+G87+2,&gt;ÿÿ
(ÿ @527E+3&lt;,ÿ@CA:+,ÿH7B5-1:Aÿ07ÿ,9A47+,ÿCE4;83C:4Dÿ17E-:5&lt;ÿ:CA4,C,503;75ÿ7A;75-&gt;ÿ
(ÿ I3:503:5ÿ356ÿ,51352,ÿ01,ÿC:9ÿ78ÿ17E-:5&lt;ÿ07ÿC,,0ÿ01,ÿ.3+:,6ÿ,2757C:2ÿ5,,6-ÿ78ÿ01,ÿ27CCE5:0D&gt;ÿ
(ÿ @9A47+,ÿJ75:5&lt;ÿ2135&lt;,-ÿ07ÿ3447Bÿ366:;7534ÿ7+ÿ6:.,+-,ÿ17E-:5&lt;ÿ0DA,-ÿ01+7E&lt;17E0ÿ01,ÿK:443&lt;,&gt;ÿÿ
(ÿ @9A47+,ÿJ75:5&lt;ÿ7A;75-ÿ87+ÿ3--:-0,6ÿ4:.:5&lt;ÿ832:4:;,-&gt;ÿÿ
(ÿ @9A47+,ÿ8,6,+34Lÿ-030,ÿ356ÿ47234ÿM5352:34ÿ:52,5;.,-ÿ87+ÿ,527E+3&lt;:5&lt;ÿNE34:0Dÿ475&lt;O0,+Cÿ+,5034ÿ7AA7+0E5:;,-ÿ87+ÿ344ÿ
:527C,ÿ4,.,4-&gt;ÿ
(ÿ @9A47+,ÿ356ÿ,.34E30,ÿ-,3-7534ÿ+,5034-ÿ:5ÿ01,ÿK:443&lt;,&gt;ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ45678ÿ9ÿ ���8�ÿ�� 7��ÿ����68�������ÿ
����ÿ�6���6���ÿ����5��ÿ6��ÿ �6��ÿ�!ÿ"�776#ÿ�6��7�� 8ÿ���7����#ÿ����68�������ÿ�5�8�8���ÿ$��!ÿ�!ÿ
�5������%ÿ� �8&amp;ÿÿ
'��5�8�ÿÿ
(ÿ *+,-,./ÿ1+ÿ2/34/5ÿ6,7ÿ.8761/ÿ19/ÿ:4;;6&lt;/ÿ67+81/7ÿ*68416;ÿ=&gt;82+3/&gt;/,1ÿ?;6,@ÿ
(ÿ *+,-,./ÿ1+ÿ/B6&gt;4,/ÿ19/ÿC/6D4E4;41Fÿ+Cÿ4&gt;8;/&gt;/,-,&lt;ÿ:4;;6&lt;/G547/ÿ4,C26D12.H1.2/ÿ1+ÿ6772/DDÿ&lt;2+519ÿ6,7ÿ/,I
H+.26&lt;/ÿ/H+,+&gt;4Hÿ7/3/;+8&gt;/,1ÿ4,H;.74,&lt;JÿE.1ÿ,+1ÿ;4&gt;41/7ÿ1+Jÿ56D1/ÿ561/2ÿ+8-+,DJÿ/;/H124H6;Jÿ561/2Jÿ,61.26;ÿ
&lt;6DJÿH+&gt;&gt;.,4H6-+,DÿDFD1/&gt;DÿK4,H;.74,&lt;ÿ54GLMJÿ2+67DJÿD47/56;NDJÿÿ8.E;4Hÿ56D92++&gt;Dÿ6,7ÿ&lt;2//,D86H/D@ÿ
(ÿ ?2+&gt;+1/ÿH+,-,./7ÿH++8/26-+,ÿE/15//,ÿ19/ÿ:4;;6&lt;/ÿ6,7ÿ19/ÿO+5,D948ÿ+,ÿ8+DD4E;/ÿH+D1GD634,&lt;Dÿ4,4-6-3/D@ÿ
(ÿ PB8;+2/ÿ19/ÿC/6D4E4;41Fÿ+CÿE.2F4,&lt;ÿ.-;41Fÿ;4,/Dÿ34;;6&lt;/G547/@ÿÿ
(ÿ PB8;+2/ÿ19/ÿC/6D4E4;41Fÿ+Cÿ4&gt;8;/&gt;/,-,&lt;ÿ:4;;6&lt;/ÿ547/ÿQ&lt;2//,Rÿ1/H9,+;+&lt;FÿKD+;62Jÿ54,7JÿTPUJÿ/1HM@ÿ
(ÿ PB8;+2/ÿ6,7ÿ8.2D./ÿ+88+21.,4-/Dÿ1+ÿ4&gt;8;/&gt;/,1ÿ2/H+&gt;&gt;/,76-+,Dÿ+Cÿ19/ÿ:4;;6&lt;/ÿO26,D8+216-+,ÿ?;6,@ÿ
(ÿ *+,D47/2ÿ19/ÿ7/3/;+8&gt;/,1ÿ+Cÿ6ÿ:4;;6&lt;/ÿO2//ÿV64,1/,6,H/ÿ?;6,@ÿ
(ÿ PD16E;4D9ÿ89FD4H6;ÿD86H/ÿ1+ÿD.88+21ÿH+&gt;&gt;.,41FÿH/,1/2ÿ6H-34-/Dÿ6,7ÿ&lt;2+.8Dÿ;4N/ÿ19/ÿP&gt;842/ÿW2/6ÿ*+&gt;&gt;.,41Fÿ
*/,1/2@ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ45678ÿ9ÿ ���8�ÿ�����5���� ��67ÿ�55��6�5�ÿÿ
ÿ
����ÿÿ
�5��ÿ����ÿ8��5 �!���ÿ�5�� ��� 8"ÿ5���ÿ75�67#ÿ8�6�ÿ6�!ÿ$!�67ÿ6����8"ÿ6�!ÿ��ÿ4�6�!ÿ%�6��8ÿ&amp;6�!ÿ5$ÿ
'6�6ÿ6�!ÿ������6ÿ��!�6�8ÿ�5ÿ��6�ÿ��ÿ85 �!ÿ�55��6�5�ÿ���ÿ6���5���6�(ÿÿ
)��5�8�ÿ
*ÿ ,-./012ÿÿ4015678ÿ9ÿ40159/ÿ.91:721;&lt;6.ÿ=6:&lt;ÿ:&lt;2ÿ&gt;9?079/ÿ@91Aÿ07ÿ6;;B2;ÿ;BC&lt;ÿ9;ÿ=01A401C2ÿ&lt;0B;678Dÿ:197;.01:9E
?07ÿ04ÿF6;6:01;Dÿ27&lt;97C678ÿ9CC2;;6G6/6:HDÿ27C0B198678ÿ2C07056CÿI2F2/0.527:Dÿ2:CJÿ
*ÿ L001I679:2ÿ=6:&lt;ÿ0:&lt;21ÿB76:;ÿ04ÿ80F217527:ÿ9;ÿ9..10.169:2ÿ:0ÿ9II12;;ÿ;.2C6MCÿ5B/?NÿOB16;I6C?079/ÿ6;;B2;ÿ9;ÿ:&lt;2Hÿ
916;2Dÿ;BC&lt;ÿ9;ÿ6;;B2;ÿ12/9:2Iÿ:0ÿ/97IÿB;2ÿ./977678Dÿ12C129?07Dÿ.BG/6Cÿ;21F6C2;Dÿ01ÿ:197;.01:9?07Dÿ67C/BI678ÿ707N
50:016P2Iÿ.9:&lt;=9H;ÿ97IÿC0772C?07;Jÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

45678ÿÿ �����8�ÿ��5�5���ÿ����75�����ÿ

������ÿ��5�5��ÿ������ÿ68ÿ6�ÿ��5�5���677�ÿ��67�ÿ�5�������ÿ� ��ÿ8���5��8ÿ�����6�5�!ÿ�5���8�!ÿ6�"ÿ8�677ÿ
�8���88�8#ÿ
$��5�8�ÿÿ
%ÿ '()*+,-./ÿ12/ÿ-3345*(ÿ*6ÿ.,*)/,78)*(9/(4/()/ÿ:1*,/:;ÿ/(1/,1-4(&lt;/(18,/:1-+,-(1ÿ*=5*(:ÿ-(38*,ÿ*12/,ÿ&gt;-:4)ÿ
)*&lt;&lt;/,)4-?ÿ:/,94)/:@ÿ
ÿ
%ÿ A*(5(+/ÿ1*ÿ=,*&lt;*1/ÿ12/ÿB4??-./ÿ-:ÿ-ÿ1*+,4:18,/),/-5*(ÿ3/:5(-5*(ÿ/::/(5-?ÿ1*ÿ12/ÿ/C4:5(.ÿ-(3ÿ6+1+,/ÿ/)*(*&lt;7@ÿ
ÿ
%ÿ 'C=?*,/ÿ12/ÿ=*::4&gt;4?417ÿ*6ÿ/:1-&gt;?4:24(.ÿ6*,&lt;-?ÿ=-,1(/,:24=:ÿD412ÿ12/ÿE-5*(-?ÿF-,GÿH/,94)/ÿ-(3ÿ:+,,*+(34(.ÿ
)*&lt;&lt;+(45/:ÿ1*ÿ-33,/::ÿ:/-:*(-?ÿ4(I+Cÿ&gt;7ÿ43/(5674(.ÿ=*1/(5-?ÿ-9-4?-&gt;4?417ÿ*6ÿ:/,94)/:;ÿ:+)2ÿ-:ÿ2*+:4(.ÿ-(3ÿ
1,-(:=*,1-5*(;ÿ6*,ÿ12/ÿ:/-:*(-?ÿD*,G6*,)/@ÿ
ÿ
%ÿ A*(:43/,ÿJ*(4(.ÿ)2-(./:ÿ1*ÿ=,*&lt;*1/ÿ)*(:4:1/(1ÿ3/:4.(ÿ6*,ÿKLMMÿ3/9/?*=&lt;/(1ÿ12-1ÿ4:ÿ)*(:4:1/(1ÿD412ÿB4??-./ÿ
)2-,-)1/,;ÿ-(3ÿ1*ÿ=,/:/,9/ÿ-(3ÿ/(2-()/ÿ/C4:5(.ÿ)2-,-)1/,ÿ-?*(.ÿN,*(1ÿH1,//1@ÿ
ÿ
%ÿ '()*+,-./ÿ)*&lt;=-5&gt;?/ÿ)*&lt;&lt;/,)4-?ÿ3/:4.(ÿ:1-(3-,3:@ÿÿ
%ÿ A**,34(-1/ÿ-(3ÿ)*&lt;&lt;+(4)-1/ÿD412ÿ9-,4*+:ÿH1-1/ÿ-./()4/:ÿ6*,ÿ.,-(1ÿ*==*,1+(45/:ÿ:=/)4O)ÿ1*ÿ12/ÿB4??-./P:ÿ(//3:;ÿ
4()?+34(.ÿ12/ÿK4)24.-(ÿ')*(*&lt;4)ÿQ/9/?*=&lt;/(1ÿA*,=*,-5*(P:ÿRK'QASÿT/3/9/?*=&lt;/(1ÿT/-37ÿA*&lt;&lt;+(45/:ÿRTTASÿ
=,*.,-&lt;@ÿÿ
%ÿ F+,:+/ÿ=-,5)4=-5*(ÿ4(ÿ12/ÿK'QAÿT/3/9/?*=&lt;/(1ÿT/-37ÿA*&lt;&lt;+(45/:ÿ=,*.,-&lt;ÿ1*ÿ.-4(ÿ-))/::ÿ1*ÿ41:ÿ/C=/,4/()/ÿ-(3ÿ
G(*D?/3./ÿ&gt;-:/;ÿ&gt;/:1ÿ=,-)5)/:;ÿ-(3ÿO(-()4-?ÿ-::4:1-()/ÿ12,*+.2ÿ.,-(1:ÿ-(3ÿ*12/,ÿ6+(34(.ÿ*==*,1+(45/:ÿ4(ÿ:+==*,1ÿ
*6ÿB4??-./ÿ=,*U/)1:;ÿ.*-?:;ÿ-(3ÿ941-?ÿ-::/1:@ÿÿ
ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

45678ÿÿ �����8�ÿ�5�������ÿ��6�6����ÿÿ���6��5�8ÿ
ÿ

�������ÿ�6���6��ÿ5��ÿ�����ÿ�5�������ÿ��6�6����ÿ!5�ÿ��5�����ÿ�ÿ��8�"���8ÿ6�"ÿ��8��5�8ÿ67�#�$ÿÿÿ
���5�8�ÿ
%ÿ '()*)+,ÿ.(ÿ/.012,ÿ3(0ÿ415467+891.:ÿ;81).,)8)&lt;,ÿ(3ÿ.4,ÿ=,8&lt;4,/ÿ8)&gt;ÿ?80@/ÿ8/ÿ.4,:ÿ80,ÿ(),ÿ(3ÿ.4,ÿ;(/.ÿ21/1.,&gt;ÿ
&gt;,/*)8*()/ÿ1)ÿ.4,ÿA19985,Bÿ
%ÿ C80@,.ÿ.4,ÿA19985,ÿ8/ÿ8ÿD&gt;,/*)8*()Eÿ=:ÿ41549154*)5ÿ?0(G1;1.:ÿ8)&gt;ÿ8&lt;&lt;,//1=191.:ÿ.(ÿ.4,ÿ)8.+089ÿ,)210();,).Hÿ
1)&lt;9+&gt;1)5ÿ.4,ÿI8*()89ÿJ80@Bÿÿ
%ÿ K)/+0,ÿ.4,ÿ828198=191.:ÿ(3ÿ8;?9,ÿ50,,)ÿ/?8&lt;,ÿ;,8/+0,&gt;ÿ8581)/.ÿ?(//1=9,ÿ),Lÿ&gt;,2,9(?;,).Bÿ
%ÿ '()/1&gt;,0ÿ&gt;,/15)ÿ5+1&gt;,91),/HÿM()1)5ÿ0,5+98*()/Hÿ8)&gt;ÿ(.4,0ÿ?(91&lt;1,/ÿ.48.ÿ,)/+0,ÿ50(L.4ÿ(0ÿ&gt;,2,9(?;,).ÿ1/ÿ&lt;()/1/.,).ÿ
L1.4ÿA19985,ÿ289+,/ÿ8)&gt;ÿ&lt;4808&lt;.,0Bÿ
%ÿ '()*)+,ÿ.(ÿ4(/.ÿ8)&gt;ÿ,)&lt;(+085,ÿ,2,)./ÿ?0(;(*)5ÿ.4,ÿA19985,N/ÿ289+,/ÿ8)&gt;ÿ&lt;4808&lt;.,0Bÿ

OPQQRSTUÿWQXYÿZXYX[\]T^_[XY[ÿXT`ÿQT`ÿX[ÿabRSYQÿcXdQÿZSe\SUXTÿfXYdÿÿWQXe\ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

45678ÿÿ �����8�ÿ�����6�5�ÿ4567ÿ

ÿ

ÿ

ÿ
���ÿ��776��ÿ5�ÿ������ÿ�����6�5�ÿ�76�ÿÿÿ!����"�#ÿ�ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ

345657ÿ9 5ÿ

CVKL@OÿWXÿÿ
MNK@N@5LD45ÿ

�����ÿ���ÿ������������ÿ����ÿ���ÿ
�������ÿ�����ÿ�ÿ�������������ÿ
��ÿ����ÿ������ÿ�����!ÿ"#�����$ÿ���ÿ
%�&amp;�����ÿ'�������ÿ(�������ÿ)&amp;�ÿ*')ÿ
++ÿ�ÿ,--./ÿ��0#����ÿ���ÿ%�����ÿ
'���ÿ��ÿ��&amp;�#��ÿ�ÿ1�����ÿ����$ÿ
���2���ÿ��2ÿ����ÿ#��ÿ&amp;���������ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ#�#��ÿ����ÿ#��ÿ���ÿ������ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ1�����ÿ���!ÿ3��ÿ"#�#��ÿ4���ÿ
5��ÿ%��ÿ���ÿ������&amp;�ÿ���&amp;�������ÿ
�&amp;�ÿ��ÿ���ÿ6������ÿ�ÿ(�����ÿ6������ÿ
�����ÿ'���!ÿ3��ÿ��������ÿ����ÿ#���ÿ
���#�������ÿ��ÿ���ÿ#�#��ÿ����ÿ#��ÿ
����ÿ���ÿ���ÿ�ÿ�#���ÿ���ÿ���ÿ
��������ÿ��ÿ����&amp;���ÿ���ÿ���&amp;���ÿ
��#�����ÿ���2���ÿ#���!ÿ3����ÿ#���ÿ
&amp;�#��ÿ7���ÿ���������ÿ��ÿ��2ÿ�ÿ
���&amp;�8&amp;ÿ��������ÿ�������ÿ��ÿ�9�����ÿ
#���ÿ���ÿ��ÿ���ÿ����!ÿÿ
%���ÿ�����ÿ���ÿ��;�&amp;�7��ÿ��ÿ���ÿ
%�����ÿ'���ÿ&amp;��ÿ��ÿ���������ÿ
����#��ÿ&amp;����#��ÿ�������������ÿ
���ÿ�������������ÿ�$ÿ��ÿ&amp;������ÿ
��$ÿ���ÿ6������ÿ�����ÿ&lt;������&amp;�!ÿ
3��ÿ6������ÿ���#��ÿ��7��2ÿ���ÿ
�7��#���ÿ�9�����ÿ���#������ÿ��ÿ
���������ÿ2����ÿ���ÿ�ÿ&amp;������ÿ���ÿ
������ÿ��ÿ��&amp;�#����ÿ��ÿ
�&amp;&amp;��������ÿ���ÿ�������ÿ������ÿ�ÿ
���ÿ#�#��ÿ����ÿ#��ÿ���!ÿÿ)�ÿ����ÿ�ÿ
����ÿ��7��2$ÿ���ÿ6������ÿ���#��ÿ����ÿ
�9�����ÿ���ÿ�����������ÿ�ÿ
�����������ÿ��ÿ��7��2���ÿ
���#������ÿ��&amp;���0#��$ÿ��&amp;�#����ÿ
���=�����ÿ1�����$ÿ���ÿ��8������ÿ
�ÿ&amp;�����&amp;���ÿ1�����ÿ���#������ÿ
2�����ÿ���ÿ6������ÿ&amp;���ÿ���ÿ�����ÿ

YZ[\]^ÿ̀ab^ÿc\de\fagÿh^adeÿia]bÿ

���ÿ%=,,ÿ&amp;�������ÿ���ÿ�������ÿ#���ÿ
��7���������ÿ*'5&gt;/$ÿ����ÿ����2ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ����������ÿ����2���ÿ���ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ&amp;���#����ÿ��ÿ�����&amp;�ÿ�#���&amp;ÿ
�����ÿ���ÿ������7�ÿ���ÿ����ÿ7��#��ÿ
&amp;����&amp;������&amp;�ÿ2����ÿ����2���ÿ��ÿ
��2ÿ��7��������ÿ���ÿ
����7��������ÿ��ÿ�����ÿ����ÿ
���������ÿ������#�����ÿ��ÿÿ��8��ÿ
���ÿ����7��������!ÿÿÿ

?@A45657ÿ5Bÿ
C45B6D45 ÿ?@A45657ÿ

G���������ÿ1�����ÿ��ÿ�ÿ��&amp;���0#�ÿ
�����H��ÿ��ÿ%�&amp;�����ÿ2��&amp;�ÿ����2�ÿ
�ÿ��������ÿ�2���ÿ��ÿ7��#�������ÿ
�H�&amp;�ÿ&amp;��������ÿ��ÿ�ÿ��1�����ÿ
��0#���!ÿ3����ÿ&amp;��������ÿ������&amp;�ÿ
���ÿ��7��������ÿ�ÿ���ÿ��������ÿ��ÿ
����ÿ�&amp;������ÿ��������ÿ��ÿ���ÿ
�����&amp;���$ÿ���ÿÿÿ�#��ÿ��ÿ�I����ÿ��ÿ
���ÿ�����&amp;���J���ÿ�������ÿ��ÿ���ÿ
��&amp;��ÿ��7�������!ÿ3���ÿ��&amp;���0#�ÿ
���ÿ��ÿ#��#�ÿ��ÿ&amp;��&amp;#�����&amp;��ÿ
2����ÿ��������ÿ����&amp;��ÿ��ÿ��;�&amp;���ÿ
#���ÿ���ÿ�ÿ&amp;��&amp;���!ÿÿ

CK6L ÿ
MNKO4P@N@5LQRÿ
SO5LQRÿ5BÿTK@5B657ÿÿ

E�ÿ����ÿ&amp;����$ÿ&amp;#�����ÿ1�����ÿ����2�ÿ
��ÿ���ÿ#��ÿ�ÿ���������ÿ��ÿ�ÿ2��ÿ
����ÿ��ÿ&amp;���������ÿ2���ÿ���ÿ������ÿ�ÿ
���ÿ"#�#��ÿ4���ÿ5��ÿ%��!ÿF�2�7��$ÿ
��ÿ����ÿ&amp;����$ÿ��1�����ÿ���ÿ��ÿ U����ÿ����ÿ6������ÿ��������ÿ�����ÿ
������ÿ��ÿ����2ÿ��ÿ���ÿ��������ÿ 2���ÿ��ÿ�����������ÿ����#��ÿ1�����ÿ
#���ÿ��ÿ��7��������ÿ�����ÿ�ÿ���ÿ ��ÿ�����ÿ����&amp;���$ÿ����ÿ���;�&amp;��ÿ��ÿ
"#�#��ÿ4���ÿ5��ÿ%��!ÿÿ
01ÿ

�ÿ

62�9�5�5�ÿ�9ÿ�ÿ�5��9ÿ�2ÿ
62�7��2�9�ÿÿ23���ÿ����ÿ���ÿ
�55�3�6*�ÿÿ(�5!�5852��5��ÿ
�557��9ÿ ��ÿ��2�5���ÿ2 �5�9ÿ2�ÿ
�5852�5�9ÿ9�2��ÿ35ÿ�8��35ÿ���ÿ
5�62����5�ÿ�2ÿ6����ÿ2�����65ÿ
�5���5�5��9ÿ���ÿ����28�ÿ
��265���59�ÿÿ

8/1&gt;7.123452ÿ/70ÿ
D4EF.7ÿG7H/H.I.7&gt;ÿ

VWXYZ[ÿ]^_`abZYcdÿef^[ÿ

234567859ÿ ÿ�5���5ÿ26�ÿ
5��5�����59�ÿ�56��95ÿ92�5ÿ
5��5�959ÿ2�ÿ���285�5��9ÿ���ÿ35ÿ
5�35ÿ�2�ÿ�����ÿ�������ÿ��5ÿ� ��5ÿ
9�2��ÿ���9�5ÿ�����ÿ2��2����759ÿ
�9ÿ����2����5�ÿ��5��ÿ�2�!�����ÿ
����5�ÿ9�5����ÿ�55�9ÿ ÿ35ÿ
����5995�ÿ�ÿ��5ÿ� ��5ÿ3���5��ÿ
�6�ÿ9ÿ��2��5�ÿ������ÿ���ÿ
����59959ÿ5��5�����59ÿ�2�ÿ��6 759�ÿ
����5���65�ÿ9��"���ÿ���ÿ2��5�ÿ
����9���785ÿ���672�9�ÿÿ
$2ÿ��ÿ�ÿ��5ÿ3���57��ÿ��26599�ÿ��5ÿ
� ��5ÿ9�2��ÿ������ÿ���ÿ�����5ÿ
�9ÿ6����ÿ���285�5��9ÿ���ÿ%&amp;'()�ÿ
�6�ÿ��28�59ÿ�ÿ3�5����ÿ�2�ÿ
6����ÿ5��5�����59ÿ9�6�ÿ�9ÿ�2��9�ÿ
�7��ÿ���285�5��9�ÿ���*9�ÿ���ÿ
�5�8�ÿ5����5���ÿ+ÿ&amp;'(ÿ2,5�9ÿ
��2�����ÿ3���57��ÿ�����65ÿ�2�ÿ
� ��5ÿ�995�9�ÿ�5�9ÿ��5ÿ� ��5ÿ�95ÿ
���ÿ�585��59ÿ5"65����ÿ��9ÿ�ÿ
����9���72��ÿ���ÿ9���2��9ÿ�����ÿ
���6�72�9�ÿÿ

62�������ÿ@59�2�93 759ÿ�6��5ÿ
��2�7��ÿ���9ÿ���ÿ2�����659�ÿ
95A��ÿ���ÿ���59�ÿ����2�B��ÿ
5��5�����59ÿ���ÿ32��2 ���ÿ����ÿ
����9���785ÿ9��,�ÿ��28���ÿ
285�9���ÿ2�ÿ��36ÿ��6 759�ÿ���ÿ
2��5�ÿ��759ÿ�9ÿ�56599����ÿ$�5ÿ
&amp;2��6ÿ�92ÿ���2��9ÿ��5ÿ� ��5ÿ
(�����ÿ&amp;2��992��ÿ�6�ÿ9ÿ
6����5�ÿ ��ÿ�5852��5��ÿ2�ÿ���9ÿ
���ÿB2���ÿ2�����659�ÿ�2��ÿ ��ÿ
�585 ÿ2�ÿ�5852��5��ÿ��2�29�9�ÿ
�2��ÿ556�5�ÿ���ÿ���2��5�ÿ
5��5�9��ÿ9�2��ÿ�C5��ÿ�5����ÿ
������ÿ95992�9ÿ2�ÿ������ÿ���ÿ
B2���ÿ������5���9�ÿ359�ÿ���67659�ÿ
���ÿ5�5����ÿ���ÿ��28�785ÿ
����2�6�59ÿ�2ÿ62������ÿ
�5852��5���ÿÿÿ
$2ÿ5�9��5ÿ����ÿ��5ÿ62������ÿ9ÿ
�59�2�985ÿÿ�2ÿ62������ÿ���ÿ
�5852��5��ÿ�55�9ÿ�5ÿ
��2�567��ÿ��5ÿ��36ÿ�5����ÿ9��5���ÿ
���ÿ5���5�ÿ��5ÿ� ��5ÿ&amp;2��6�ÿÿ
(�����ÿ&amp;2��992��ÿ���ÿ9��,ÿ
9�2��ÿ5����5ÿ�ÿ�5�����ÿ2�5�ÿ
62����6�72�ÿ ��ÿ��5ÿ
62�������ÿÿ@5����ÿ�26�9ÿ��2��9�ÿ
$�5ÿ� ��5ÿ&amp;2��6ÿ9ÿ556�5�ÿ585��ÿ ��36ÿ�96�992�9�ÿ2�ÿ2��5�ÿ�2���ÿ
���5ÿ2��2����759ÿ9�2��ÿ35ÿ
�2��ÿ�5��9ÿ�2ÿ�5��595��ÿ��5ÿ

-./0.12345ÿ/70ÿ89:;4&lt;ÿ
=759&gt;ÿ

00ÿ

J�5ÿ����ÿ2�ÿ��5ÿ���K9ÿ234567859ÿ
���ÿ35ÿ����5995�ÿ���2���ÿ� ��5ÿ
�2659�ÿ2�����659�ÿ2�ÿ2��5�ÿ
�5���72�9�ÿ����ÿ2�ÿ��5ÿ�2�9ÿ���ÿ
234567859ÿ ÿ�5���5ÿ9��2��ÿ
�����5�9��9ÿ ��ÿ62������ÿ
9��*5�2�5�9�ÿ
$�5ÿ���ÿ�562��5��9ÿ���9���ÿ
�����5�9��9ÿ ��ÿ26�ÿ95�865ÿ
6�39�ÿ96�229�ÿ�2���2L�9�ÿ�5�2��ÿ
��5�659�ÿ���ÿ2��5�ÿ5859ÿ2�ÿ
�285���5���ÿ(����5�9��9ÿ3�2��5�ÿ
��5ÿ962�5ÿ2�ÿ�8��35ÿ�����ÿ�2��9ÿ
���ÿ2��5�ÿ�585��5�ÿ5�62����5ÿ
67B5�ÿ5����5�5��ÿ�ÿ62������ÿ
�678759�ÿ���ÿ5����65ÿ9��,ÿ
6���6759ÿ���ÿ5"65�659�ÿ(29935ÿ
�����5�9ÿ���ÿ�6��5Mÿ
Nÿ P55����ÿ&amp;2����ÿ
Nÿ Q5��32���ÿ���9ÿ2�ÿ
�285���5��ÿ
Nÿ R5�ÿP�*5ÿ(�36ÿS6�229ÿ
Nÿ $��85�95ÿ���ÿ+�5�ÿ'��5��5���5ÿ
S6�22ÿT9��6�ÿ
Nÿ &amp;���35�ÿ2�ÿ&amp;2��5�65ÿÿ
Nÿ Q5�2�*9ÿQ2��� 59�ÿ
Nÿ SUUTSÿ
Nÿ P55����ÿ&amp;2�95�8��6�ÿ

�ÿ

3ÿ 56789 ÿ�ÿ��88�79�ÿ�8�6ÿ
3ÿ ÿ��� 9��ÿ��6�ÿ�86�7�8ÿ
3ÿ � 6���8�ÿ�7��7��9ÿ

/,8���8ÿ68!�79ÿ�ÿ/8ÿ� 68 8-ÿÿÿ
&amp;"679�ÿ��8ÿ���9ÿ68�78�2ÿ8�86��ÿ
/,8���8ÿ�"�ÿ/8ÿ789�C8ÿ�9ÿ
�6767�*8ÿ�ÿ�9ÿ7!��8!89��� 9ÿ
!!"97�#ÿ$�� 9ÿ$�89�#ÿ
��8"�82ÿ79ÿ686ÿ�ÿ�8��ÿ��"ÿ��8ÿ
3ÿ � 6���8�869ÿ�7��7��9ÿ ��8�8ÿ ���9979�ÿ !!779Bÿ����7�#ÿ
��6"��"�ÿ��8ÿ#8�6-ÿÿ
3ÿ �7��7��9ÿ����8ÿ% "79�ÿ
&amp;8�8��!89�ÿ$"��67�#ÿ
'�8ÿD8�68�� 9ÿ���9ÿ�"�ÿ/8ÿ
68�78�8ÿ�9ÿ"���8ÿ8�86#ÿC�8ÿ
3ÿ �7��7��9ÿ&amp;8��6�!89�ÿ�ÿ
#8�62ÿ�ÿ89"68ÿ����ÿ���ÿ�68ÿ
'6�9�6��� 9ÿ
68�8��9�ÿ�9ÿ/,8���8ÿ�68ÿ/879�ÿ
3ÿ �7��7��9ÿ(�9!7�ÿ
� 68 8-ÿÿÿ
&amp;8�8��!89�ÿ 6�6�� 9ÿ
3ÿ )��86�8ÿ89�86ÿ
��6�986�7�ÿ�7��ÿ !8ÿ�ÿ��88ÿ
6��97*�� 9ÿ!�#ÿ�6�78ÿ
'�8ÿ�6�779ÿ�ÿ!"97�7���ÿ86�7�82ÿ
��"9�886ÿ���7���ÿ�ÿ7!��8!89�ÿ
79��"79�ÿ���86ÿ�9ÿ8�86ÿ
!8ÿ!���+���8ÿ�!!"97�#ÿ
�6,8��-ÿ. �"9�886ÿ����7�8ÿ�7��ÿ/8ÿ 79�6��6"��"682ÿ7ÿ98ÿ��#ÿ����ÿ!�9#ÿ
�!!"97�8ÿ� 68 ÿ6ÿ���78�8ÿ
�67����ÿ�ÿ/"7�79�ÿ�7�*89ÿ
89���8!89�ÿ�9ÿ�!!"97�#ÿ�678-ÿÿ ����ÿ���9ÿ/,8���8-ÿ)�7�8ÿ��8ÿ
.7����8ÿ�ÿ(!�768ÿ�6�78ÿ!"97�7���ÿ
'ÿ89"68ÿ����ÿ��6�986�7�ÿ�68ÿ ��
6ÿ86�7�8ÿ�68ÿ
80�789�ÿ�9ÿ818���82ÿ��8ÿ.7����8ÿ 9��ÿ8�6�2�ÿ7���9/7��8�-6ÿ#�ÿ88���8
8ÿ��8ÿ����ÿ�ÿ
!�#ÿ�7�ÿ�ÿ�9786ÿ��6�986�7�ÿ 8�86ÿ86�7�8ÿ!�#"ÿ�7!7
��688!89�ÿ����ÿ��8�6�#ÿ789��#ÿ 98�ÿ8�8��!89�ÿ�9ÿ�ÿ�� 9ÿ�6ÿ
68�97/7�7�82ÿ���"9��/7�7�#2ÿ�9ÿ 688�8��!89�2ÿ7�Bÿ7!�6��9�ÿ�6ÿ
�89���ÿ�ÿ�!!7�!89�-ÿÿ
��8ÿ.7����8ÿ�ÿ�9786ÿ��8ÿ7!����2ÿ
� �2ÿ�9ÿ��89���ÿ/898C�ÿ�ÿ
/"7�79�ÿ�ÿ8�86ÿ#�8!ÿ6ÿ
'�8ÿ�7��7��9ÿ���9979�ÿ(9�/�79�ÿ$��ÿ
UVWÿYZ[\]Wÿ^_`aWbÿ
68?"768ÿ����ÿ���ÿ���9ÿ/8ÿ68�78�82ÿ
�9ÿ"���8ÿ7�ÿ98�8 �6#2ÿ8�86#ÿ@ÿ
#8�6-ÿ)�7�8ÿ�!�68�897�8ÿ
"���8ÿ!�#ÿ9�ÿ��"6ÿ�ÿA89ÿ�ÿ
8�86#ÿ@ÿ#8�62ÿ68�"��6ÿ68�78�ÿ�ÿ��8ÿ
���9ÿ�9ÿ7�ÿ/,8���8ÿ�7��ÿ/8ÿ
7!�6��9�ÿ�ÿ89"68ÿ����ÿ��8ÿ���9ÿ
�9ÿ68���8ÿ679�9�8ÿ�68ÿ
818���82ÿ��8��86ÿ��8ÿ���ÿ�9ÿ
/,8���8ÿ�68ÿ/879�ÿ� 68 82ÿ
��8��86ÿ��8ÿ���9Bÿ��7�78ÿ�68ÿ���ÿ
68�8��9�ÿ�9ÿ���6�67��82ÿ�9ÿ��7��ÿ

3EFGH=HF6ÿFIÿ
JK6HLH954ÿM&lt;EGHL&lt;=ÿÿÿ

3456ÿ89:5;&lt;=ÿ

01ÿ

���869���8ÿ8�86ÿ#�8!ÿ�� 9ÿ79ÿ
��8ÿ.7����8-ÿ(9�7988679�ÿ�"78ÿ�9ÿ
9�79�ÿ�!!"97�#ÿ7�" 79ÿ��9ÿ
�8��ÿ��8ÿ.7����8ÿ8N��68ÿ��88ÿ7"8ÿ
�9ÿ8�86!798ÿ��8��862ÿ��8682ÿ�9ÿ
��ÿ�ÿ8N��9ÿ79�6��6"��"68ÿ�ÿ
���!! ��8ÿ98�ÿ8�8��!89�ÿ6ÿ
� 68 ÿ���86ÿ���9ÿ���ÿ�9ÿ
/,8���8-ÿÿ
O9ÿ� 7� 92ÿ��8ÿ.7����8ÿ�7��ÿ�� ÿ
�9786ÿ�6�779�ÿ� 7��9�8ÿ79ÿ
�688�ÿ�9ÿ��86ÿ"��7�#ÿ
7!�6�8!89�ÿ�7��79ÿ87�9��8ÿ
67���+�+��#ÿ6ÿ79ÿ���869���8ÿ67���
+�+��#2ÿ�86ÿ��8ÿ.7����8ÿ
'6�9�6��� 9ÿ���9-ÿ'#�7����#2ÿ��8ÿ
.7����8ÿ�7��ÿ���ÿ�ÿ��8ÿ�8�7��8ÿ�ÿ
/��79ÿ�6�9�ÿ�9ÿ��9ÿ6ÿ�7��ÿ
8��/�7�ÿ�8�7��ÿ� 8 !89�ÿ
7�67��ÿ�6ÿC9�9�79�ÿ"��ÿ
7!�6�8!89�-ÿÿ

3E&lt;=&lt;EG5PF6ÿFIÿ
QH445R&lt;ÿST5E5L;&lt;Eÿ

ÿ'�8ÿ/8�"�#2ÿ�7"��ÿ���8�6�9�82ÿ�9ÿ
�7�67�ÿ���6���867��ÿ����ÿ/82ÿ�ÿ
��8ÿ8N�89�ÿ� 7/�82ÿ�6886�8ÿ79ÿ
�9#ÿ7!��8!89��� 9ÿ81 6�-ÿÿ
ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ4556789ÿ4ÿ

66��7��ÿ���7��ÿ�78�7�6�68ÿ�56�96�ÿ
�������ÿ!�"ÿÿ
$%&amp;'()ÿ)'+,-.)/ÿÿ

0����1232�ÿÿ

F;3"723�ÿ9;�1G2�32�ÿ!�"ÿÿ
$%&amp;'()ÿ)HIJHKJL.'K,-.)Mÿ

N732�"2�2�ÿÿ

Q�?��1ÿ?9;&lt;23ÿ
$RS,L,+L.T)ÿUH-'+T)/ÿÿ
P5C�ÿP2�ÿ[�;"ÿ
ÿ

0����1232�ÿÿ
E3�V8�9ÿO�!�"�"ÿ
N732�"2�2�ÿÿ

^�87�1��ÿ6;�Z2]Gb;&gt;23ÿÿ
$%.UT-T)ÿU.eS.f,KHK).)/ÿÿ

0����1232�ÿÿ

Q�"8723h:ÿ"7�:"92ÿ
$R.L).TUÿI.JeSHL./ÿÿ

N732�"2�2�ÿÿ

456623ÿ7�!�"�"ÿ��895�2:ÿ:6�99ÿ";ÿ
62��56ÿ3�&lt;23ÿ���ÿ:"32�6ÿ8;33�=
�;3:ÿ&gt;�"7ÿ&gt;299ÿ�2&lt;29;?2�ÿ3�?�3���ÿ
&gt;;;�:@ÿ&gt;;;�9;":ÿ&gt;�"7��ÿAÿ";ÿBÿ
6�92:ÿ;Cÿ:6�99ÿ";ÿ62��56ÿ3�&lt;23:ÿ
���ÿ:"32�6:@ÿ���ÿ5?9���ÿC;32:":Dÿ
E�&lt;2:ÿ���ÿ6��2:ÿ�:ÿ7�!23��859�Dÿÿ
O�!23��"2:ÿ��ÿ8�&lt;2:ÿ���ÿ6��2:ÿGÿ
:&gt;�36��1ÿ��ÿ:533;5����1ÿ&gt;;;�2�ÿ
�32�:ÿ��ÿ�5"56�DÿP;;:":ÿ���ÿC;3=
�12:ÿ��ÿ5?9���ÿC;32:":ÿ�53��1ÿ
:?3��1ÿ���ÿ:56623Dÿ
W2�872:ÿ�9;�1ÿ:7;329��2:ÿ;Cÿ"72ÿ
X32�"ÿY�Z2:ÿ
\�9]ÿ�8V;�:ÿ"7�"ÿ;8853ÿ�9;�1ÿ
8;�:"�9ÿ�32�:ÿ�53��1ÿ"72ÿP2�ÿ[�;"ÿ
6�13�";3]ÿ&gt;���;&gt;ÿ;Cÿÿ^_`ÿAÿGÿ
40QN0^W0PÿBaÿ
4;�9:ÿ:�"53�"2�ÿ&gt;�"7ÿ8;9�ÿb;&gt;��1ÿ
:?3��1ÿ&gt;�"23@ÿC;5��ÿ�9;�1ÿ:22?�1=
2:gÿ:"32�6:ÿ���ÿ9�Z2:7;32:ÿ
4"�!�9�i2�ÿ�5�2:ÿ���ÿ!9;&gt;;5"ÿÿÿ
�32�:ÿ

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ4556789ÿÿ

�7�����������6ÿ��5�ÿ
Road Network
Vil lage of Empire
-

N

A
Shakia
Park

Staie Trunki ne

Chippewa Run

l ,100 Average Annual Deily Traffic
(2016)
-

-

Natural Area

&lt;ii

Private 5treet

t:
11.

Public St reet

F ishe SI

saws u,y or
J.unn R.
John.~on
Memorial P;irl(

illi St

ri s;

Wile• SI

c

§
Michigan

cii
~

~.

Sleeping Bear Dunes National Lakeshore

05

Networks
Northwest

01ÿ

"'

"t:fr--- -~1

Ayi&gt;Nonh SI

012)

I

.;; 1 Mie gan

81--

5

0

Wiloe

�ÿ

Wate r Service
Village of Empire

N

A

' - _._.
I
Fbrem:e

\,t

I

Shakia Park
Walei Service

I

Pa ,eel

Chippewa Run
Natu ral Area

\l!I ca nt

- 1 n st!MlonaJ
-

$

I

State TrunkJine

I
I
I

I
I

;;:;

•
8
.5

.--..

Lake Michigan
Beach Park

I

I

Village

JAme, R.
John,on
U tmorial Pa.tit

I

Sa lo l uiy

.- - 1 I

I

\ - !heJ.P :,t -

1.:1 mbk in. l.n

Pces.erve

I

"'"'

l))'r,lf

0

Q

C

J

i

~

"'
I

; '\ -

_ ~~o!h? __

- - ... - -- - . - - ...
..,

Pl-r.t',fA?P"°' l n ~

\Vashi l'M)~On. SI

✓

"'

I

I
'

"''

J·

Sleeping Bear Dunes tl ational l akes hore

-----c::=====-----------===========-----------MilH
_

0

0.125

0 2S

o..s

Networks
Northwest
......... ,

OJS

1

Tbs map I&gt; lnt=nd:&lt;l t,, ref:t~noe only anti
1=prese:nu a geogaphical interp-e\a;ion, NOT a form-al survey.

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ4556789ÿÿ

����ÿ����6�ÿ���7ÿ����ÿ
Table l
Population Change (1940-2010)

Village of Empire, Empire Township and Leelanau County
Percent

Percent

1940 Change 1950 Change
1940-50
1950-60
•.m

,., ,,

r ~

Empire Township

(excluding Village)
Leelanau County

325

Percent
Change

1960

Percent
Change

1970

1970-80

1960-70

Percent
Change

1980

Percent
Change

1990

1980-90

2000

1990-00

P ercell!
Change

2010

2000-10

-5.6

2J!

u. J

448

- 8.7

409 - 15.6 1 31 2.9

355

6.5

378

-0.8

373

-15.7

274

37.2

376

45.5

547

-16.6

456

10.3

503

40.6

707

14.4

809

8,647

7.8

9,32 1

16.6

10,872

28.8

14,007

18.0

16,527

27.8

21,119

2.8

21,708

8,436

2.5

Note: Township populations. excluding the Village, are provided in paremheses: percem change is calculated for the emire To\\11ship. including Village ponion.
Source: Northwest Michigan Council of Govemmems

Table 2
Age Distribution

Village of Empire, Leelanau Comity, State - 2000 and 2010
Age Group

Leelau,111 County

Village of Empire
2000

2010

Total

Percent

Total

Percent

0-4 y ears

8

2. 1

18

4.8

5- 17 years

51

13.5

32

8 .5

% Change
2000-2010

I

2000

20 10

State
2000

2010

Percent

Percent

125.0

5.1

4.3

6.8

6.0

-37.3

19.3

17.7

19.3

15.2

Percent

Percent

18-24 years

24

6.3

8

2.1

-66.7

5.7

5.7

9.4

9.9

25-44 years

73

19.3

63

16.8

-1 3.7

24.2

16.9

29.8

24.7

45-64 years

133

35.2

143

38.1

7.5

28.3

34.4

22.4

27.9

89

23.5

111

29.6

24.7

17.4

23.4

12.3

13.8

65 +

Total
Median Age

378

-0.8

375
49.1

56.8

I
42.6

I

I
50.3

35.5

38.9

Note: Due to rounding. percentages may not sum to I 00 percent.
Source: U.S. Bureau of the Census.

Table 3
Seasonal Housing Characteristics
Village of Empire, Empire Tov.'11Ship, Leelanau County and State of Michigan - 2010
Total Units

Seasonal Units

% Seasonal

V illage of Empue

347

113

32.6

Em pire To\vnship

1,088

442

40.6

Leelanau County

14,935

4,681

3 1.3

State of M ichigan

4,532,233

263,071

5_8

Source: US Census Bureau Census 2010

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ4556789ÿÿ

����ÿ����6�ÿ���7ÿ����ÿ���7�97�68�ÿ
Table 4
Value of Specified Owner-Occupied H ousing Units
Village of Empire - 2005-2009
Housing Yalues

Percent of Units

Less th.an $50,000

0.0

$50 ,000 - 99,000

1.7

SI00,000 • 149,000

11.3

SI S0,000- 199.000

19.1

$200,000 · 299,000

42.6

$300,000 or more

25 .2
$238,000

Median Value

Source: US Census Bureau Conununity Survey (2005-2009)

Table S
Inco me Statistics
Village of Empire, Empire Township, Leelanau Cotmty and State of Michigan
(in 2009 inflation-adj u5ted dollars)
Village of
£ moire
172

!\umber of H ouseholcls
E mpire
Townshio
563

Leelanau
Countv
9,354

44
18
34
105
124
95
57
36
33
17
43 ,973
35,109

449
299
1,098
1,064
1,436
1,789
1,258
1,169
366
426
54,451
31,874

T otal Households
Households Income Levels
Less than $10,000
30
$ 10,000 to $ 14,999
13
$ 15,000 to $24,999
22
$25,000 to $34,999
23
$35,000 to $49,999
40
$50,000 to $74,999
6
$75,000 to $99,999
18
$ 100,000 to $149,999
14
$ 150,000 to $199,999
6
$200,000 or more
0
32,045
1\Iedi an household income
28,000
Per caoita income
Source: US Census Bureau Community Survey (2005-2009)

01ÿ

State of
l\Iichigan

$ 48,700
$ 25,172

�ÿ

ÿ4556789ÿÿ

����ÿ����6�ÿ���7ÿ����ÿ���7�97�68�ÿ
Tabl e 6
Civilia n Lab or For ce Comp arisons ancl Unemploym ent
Leelanau County and State of Michigan
2006-20 10
Sta te of M icbigan
(in l ,000' s)

Leelanau County
2010
Labor F orce

2008

2006

20 10

2008

2006

10,769

11,234

11,628

4,790

4,936

5,068

Employed

9,684

10,544

11,048

4,193

4,519

4,719

Unemployed

1,085

690

580

597

4 16

350

10.1

6. 1

5.0

12.5

8.4

6.9

Unemployment
Rate %

Source: Office ofLabor Market Infonuation, Michigan Department ofTechnology, Management and Budget

Table 7
Employment by I nclus try 2009
Village and County
Village of Empire

Industry
Nwnber
Agriculrure, forestry, fishing, hunting, and mining

Percent

Leelanau County
Number

Percent

0

0.0

43 0

4.4

20

15.3

1.065

10.9

M.inufacmring

3

2.3

774

7.9

Wholesale trade

12

9.2

204

2.1

Retail trade

46

35.1

1.108

11.3

Transportation warehousing. and utilities

0

0.0

3 15

3.2

Information

3

2.3

163

1.7

Finance, insurance, real estate, rental and leasing

6

4.6

537

5.5

Professional. scientific, management, administrative. and waste
management services

2

l.S

837

8.5

Educational, health, and social services

20

15.3

2,463

25.2

Arts. entertainment, recreation, accommodation, and food services

11

8.4

1,279

13.1

Other services ( except public administration)

6

4.6

406

4.1

Public administration

2

l.S

2 11

2.2

Construction

Source: U.S. Census Bureau Community Survey (2005-2009)

01ÿ

�ÿ

ÿ4556789ÿÿ

����ÿ����6�ÿ���7ÿ����ÿ���7�97�68�ÿ
Table 8
Sleeping Bear Dunes National L akesh or e
Conmarative Annual Public Use D ata
Year

Total Vi~its

Coast Guard
Station

Dune Climb

2011
20 10
2009
2008
2007

1,348,304

30,999

96,738

1,280,934
1,165,836
1.104.597
1.134.3 12
1.147,3 14
1,2 18,4 10
1.114,6 15
1,153,962
1,170,873
1,127,107
1,195,084
1,364,834
1,298,205

30,561
27.297
22.720
2 1.986
22.120
22.466
31.402
26,307
28,580
32,549
38,182
30,274

84,738
81.320
78.928
83.3 15

2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
1996
1995
1994

1,157,6 16
1,09 1.005
1.15 1.957
1.159,676

29,049
25,745
18.434
24.958
26.217

Stocking
S. Drive
113,400
101,094

92,287
82.779
83.345
84.472

Source: U.S. National Park Service

01ÿ

Platte River Visitor Center

28,726

83,482

196,945

8 1,598
73.686
74,4 14
79.363
84.008
86,708
79,713
80,037
85,822
81 ,035
84,060
114,088
90,477

170,251
158.982
135,978
133.42 1
118,836
11 7,032
123,119
137,780
126,887
125,577
132,427
134,808
89,828

89,846
8 1,517

34,92 1
2 8.32 1
2 8.008
31.798
25.54 7
25.547
22.974
25,022
28,0 12
25,007
3 1,205
35,683
3 1,888
2 3,764
2 3,120

71 .028
70.466

97.282
125,621

2 3.477
36.047

77.566
84,301
79.213
79.289

94,853
82,527
78,837
78,753
89,278
82,327
84,297
85,74 1
82,265
50,990
90,3 16
100,660

89.080
92.593
83.474
83,645
8 1,795
73,796
66,791
93,149
98,332

Esch Road

73.278
80,987

�ÿ

Section 4.09 Schedule of Regulations

Min. Lot Area
ZoninQ
District

District Name

Area

Max_Ht of
structure

(sq. tt)

Width
(ft)

Feet (a)

Yard Setbacks
Front
(ft)

Min.
Side

Min.
Rear

{tt)

(ft)

Min.
space
btwn

Min_ Min.
Alley Water

Bldgs

General Residential

12,500

100

35

20min

10

10

10

20

20

MR

Mixed Residential

2 ac (c)

150

35

40min

20

20

20 (d)

20

40

900

I

-

Maximum
Lot
CoveraQe
%
25% (b)

1 BR- 540/

OU

40% (b)

2 BR 700/DU

VR

Village Residential

6,250

so

35

10min
20max

5

10

10

I -

CR

Commercial Residential

5,000

so

35

5 min
20 max

0 (e)
(f)

10 (f)

10

-

Light llndustrial

1 acre

100

35

20min

15 (t)

20

10

_ ,

3acres

300

35

10min

10

20

20

20

LI

01ÿ

RIC

Recreation/Conservation

PUD

Planned Unit
Development
a)
b)
c)
d)
e)
f)

g)

Key:

See Article 7

I

I
I

I

10

1 750

10 (g)
10

I 750
I NA

20

I 900

-

50"/4

-

70%

NA

60%

-

10%

See Article 7

Maximum height for an accessory building shall be 25 feet or the height of the primary structure, whichever is l ess.
Existing 50' wide (or less) platted lots shall be perm itted a maximum of 50 perce-nl building coverage.
A min imum of 8,700 square feet or lot area is requjred per dwelling unit.
Minimum setback from an internal drive serving multiµle family dwellings, shall be 10 feet.
Minimum O' side yard setback applies when a commercial use is adj acent to a commeroial use, the setback is increased to 5' for a commercial use
adjacent to a residential use, or for a residential use adjacent to another residential use.
Except when adjaoent to a different zoning di strict, the greater of the two di strict side setback standards applies .
T he minimum buildin g spacin g does not apply far the portion of a building utilizing the zero setback provision, p rovided a firewall is provided between
buildings located on the property line.

D.U. - Dwelling Unit

sq . fl -square feet

Arti cle 4 : D.istricls
Vi/Jage o f Empire Zoning Ordinance

fl -feet

4-15

Amended: De-cember 8, 2011
Effective : December 29, 2011

ÿ4556789ÿÿ
��797�ÿ����6����68��6ÿ��ÿ�6�����9�7�ÿ

GR

Min_ &amp;
Max_SF
per D.U or
Main bldg

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008157">
                <text>Empire_Master-Plan_2019</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008158">
                <text>Empire Planning Commission, Village of Empire, Empire Township, Leelanau County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008159">
                <text>2019</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008160">
                <text>Village of Empire Master Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008161">
                <text>The Village of Empire Master Plan was prepared by the Empire Planning Commission with the assistance of Networks Northwest in 2019.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008162">
                <text>Networks Northwest (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008163">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008164">
                <text>Empire (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008165">
                <text>Empire Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008166">
                <text>Leelanau County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008167">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008169">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008170">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008171">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008172">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038316">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54690" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58961">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/85fab6fe71b758fc296fd0860e3139a9.pdf</src>
        <authentication>2d0f1f3dc9e5996037a4204566844efa</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008156">
                    <text>EMMET COUNTY MASTER PLAN 1971

�-

JI

I
I
I
I
I

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
EMMET COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION

I

Emmet County, Michigan

I
I

,~
I

I
I

April, 1971

Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc.
Community Planning Consultants
29621 Northwestern Highway
Southfield, Michigan 48076

I
I
I
I
f
f

r

The preparation of this report was financially aided through a Federal Grant from
the Department of Housing and Urban Development, under the Urban Planning
Assistance Program, authorized by Section 701 of the Housing Act of 1954, as
amended, administered by the Michigan Department of Commerce.

�CONTENTS

1

INTROD\.JC: ION

2
2
4

;o, tJL~ ;ICN
lRENDS
;~Cc (_;F~OUPS
f'fl () JECTIOl\!S

5

OTHE H CHAti.ACTE R IST ICS

6
9

E XIS r1NG LAND USE:

11
12
14
16
16

riESGl.l~li:S . .

su;,.s
TO?() !~ RAPH /

W.C. Tt:R
.A.lJ R It. U l Tl JRE
8f:SIDEhl !'I.AL

19
19
20
21
22
26

.

UR8.;N DE:'JE LOPM ENT PROCESS
CCNCEPTS
DEMANDS .
Rl:: SI DUl1" IA'._ ARl:::AS PL.AN
i=iE:.COMMF:NCA TIONS

28
32
33
34

.i Hi:Or1 ET!C~ t.. l'JEl::D

SCHnOL f'L.AN~;

RECOMMEND ATIONS

36
37
39
40

f-kCR[,!l.-r ION . .
RfUlf:ATIQN Rt.SOU RCES
,_oct.,.!.. NrEDS . . .
RECO MM EN D;\ 7" 10NS

.

�-I

,~
I
1I
I
I
1I
.

,.

··r-..

I
I'

,,

'I
I

-r\

'l

,

COMMUNITY FACILITIES
COMMUNITY BUILDINGS
COURTHOUSE AND JAi L

48
48
49

FAIRGROUNDS
MEDICAL FACI LIT! ES

50
51

ROAD COMMISSION
LIBRARIES
NORTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN COLLEGE

52
53
53

AIRPORTS . . . . . . . . . .
WATER AND SEWER UTI LIT! ES
LAND FILLS . .
FIRE STATIONS

55
59
59

COMMERCIAL . .
THREE COUNTY REGION
SEASONAL VARIATION IN SALES
EXISTING RETA! L CENTERS
RETAIL CENTER PLANS

62
62
63
64
65

INDUSTRIAL
EMPLOYMENT . . .
EXISTING INDUSTRY
INDUSTRIAL PLAN

70
70
73

THOROFARES . . .
THOROFARESTANDARDS
REGIONAL ORIENTATION

79
79
79

THOROFARE DEMANDS
THOROFAREPLAN

81

82

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN

88

54

74

�TABLES

1

History of Population Growth (1900-1970)

2. Population Trends: 1930 to 1970
3
4

' '":ounty Population P:·ojections
Sumrnc.
ProJections for County Civil Divisions

5. Existing Land Use
6. Countv Soil Resources
7 Selected Farm Ctiaracter 1stics

8. Public School Capacities
9. School B1Jild1ng Data
10. Theoretical School Building Needs
11 . Projected K-12 Public Scho ol DE:mands
12. REcreatI on Land Inventory
13. Local Recreation Needs
14. Seasonal Variation of Comparison Retail Sales
15. 1960 Occupational Ctiaracteristics
16. County industrial Characteristics .
17 . Potential Industrial Land Areas
18. S:reet Classitications and Standards

2
3
5
7

11
13
17
30
31
32
34
39
40
64
71
75
77

81

�'Jr'
-,.
, ._

-·:
I

FIGURES

POPULATION IN CRITICAL AGE GROUPS

.

. 3A

EXISTING LAND USE

. SA

SELECTED RESOURCES AND INVENTORY

. 10A

SOIL RESOURCES

. . . . .

. . . ·12A

TOPOGRAPHY

. 14A

RESIDENTIAL AREAS PLAN

. 22A

RECREATION PLAN

. 35A

SCENIC AND RECREATION INVENTORY

. 37A

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

. 61A

. . . . .

EXISTING COMMERCIAL LAND USE

. 618

MINIMUM CONVENIENCE CENTERS
ALANSON CENTER
CARP LAKE CENTER

. 67A
. .

. 67B

CROSS VILLAGE CENTER

. 67C

PELLSTON CENTER

. -67D

POTENTIAL INDUSTRIAL SITES

. 75A

TRAFFIC FACILITIES AND GENERATORS

. 82A

THOROFARE PLAN

. 86A

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN

. 87A

I,

-I
I
I
Ir--\
I
I

f
I
I

\
I

I
r

I
J

�COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
WARD H WALSTROM, Chairman
DONALD HODGKISS, Vice Chairman
CHAR LES WILLS, Secretary
ROBERT CILKE, JR
JAMES C ESTERLINE
THOMAS FAIRBAIRN
SEBERON LITZENBURGER
HARRY PINTARELLI
ROBERT TRACY

COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
HUGH HEYNIG, Chairman
HUBERT BACHELOR
ROBERT Cl LKE, JR
AL FOSTER
ROBERTJ GREENWELL
ERNEST KUEBLER
DONALD D . JARDlf\'
ERNST MANTHEI
FRANK SCHMALZRIED
J. H VvEBSTER
E S. WIXSON
HARRIET L KILBORN, County Clerk

�I

10

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

FOREWORD

This report summarizes a series of Comprehensive Plan reports prepared for
Emmet County, under the terms of both a " 701" Urban Planning Assistance
Program and a Farmers Home Administration Comprehensive Water and Sewer
Planning Grant. Titled "Future Land Use Plan", this publication embodies the
findings and conclusions of twelve plan reports .
Following is a list of the supporting plan reports prepared during the course of the
program . These contain much of the detailed concepts, data, and alternative plan
recommendations considered to be part of this Future Land Use Plan:

Grant
Program

Work Element

Date

Commercial Economic Base
Resource Inventory

March, 1969
April , 1969

HUD
HUD (part)
FHA (part)

Land Use Inventory
Population Analysis

October, 1969
November, 1969

FHA
FHA

Residential &amp; School Plan

January, 1970

HUD

Community Facilities
Recreation Plan

January, 1970

HUD
HUD

Housing Study (No. 1)

March, 1970
March, 1970

HUD

Industrial Economic Base
Thorofare Plan

December, 1970

HUD

January, 1971

HUD

Housing Study (No . 2)

April , 1971

Water and Sewer Plan

April, 1970

HUD
FHA

When application was made for the HUD "701" Planning Assistance Grant, a
supplemental planning program was funded by Farmers Home Administration to
prepare a County-wide Comprehensive Water and Sewer Plan. The activation of
this two-phase planning program resulted in a more comprehensive approach to
County planning. This Land Use Plan is more complete because it benefited from

I

the plans developed under the FHA work . Conversely, the FHA Plan is more
complete because of the research completed for this plan .
The two programs dovetailed well from a technical point of view, and both were
coordinated under the auspices of the Emmet County Planning Commission.

-i-

[

�-I
INTRODUCTION

I

I
I

I
I
I

The Emmet County Planning Commission was created by Ordinance under the
terms of the County Planning Commission Enabling Act, No 282, of the Public
Acts of 1945. With the signature of the then Governor of the State of Michigan,
the nine (9) member Commission was officially established on Apr il 26 , 1967
(O rdinance No . 2) . According to the terms of the Enabling Statute, the
Commission membership " . .. shall be representative of the important segments
of the economic, government and social life and development of the County of
Emmet . . . " Guided by the broad language of the Enabling Statute, the County
Planning Commission membership represents major areas of interest in Emmet
County .
Creation of the Emmet County Plann ing Commission was a formal recognition of
the need to establish long-range guidelines for development. These guidelines were
deemed necessary to coordinate the planning endeavors of rrany County interests,

I.

government. Hence, the Comprehensive Plan portrays basic development policies

··r\

related to :

I.

I
f

I
I

I
I

including

business,

industry,

recreation,

community

services

and

local

Recreation and scen ic resources
Industrial patterns
Commercial facilities and tourist accommodations
Community services
Planning and development services
Effective traffic ci rcu la ti on
Citizen information
Work on the Comprehensive Plan began on May 1, 1968, under the financial
auspices of a Federal Comprehensive Planning Assistance Grant, funded under
Section "701" of the Federal Housing Act. Emmet County provided one-third of
the costs in order to participate in the planning program . Or iginally a two-year
planning program, funding delays have extended the work over a three-year
period, and considerable work remains in the area of development controls
(zoning, subdivisions, etc .).

-1-

�-

,

POPULATION

In November of 1959, a Comprehensive Analysis and Report of Population in
Emmet County was prepared with F.H.A. Planning Assistance Funds. The
conclusions from that report are summarized and updated herein, so that the
findings will properly relate to this Comprehensive Land Use Plan .

TRENDS
Emmet County's population in 1960 was lower than it was in 1950. Also, the
County's population in 1930 was only slightly lower than the 1960 total .
However, the 1970 Census reports show a 15.3% increase over 1960. Desp ite this
recent gain, the County reached its peak population in 1910.
The history of County population change since 1900 is summar ized in TAB LE 1.

TABLE 1
HISTORY OF POPULATION GROWTH
1900- 1970
Emmet County

t

Census Year

1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970

•....:.,

lf1u
• I

1~~
&gt;.::

I.....:

County Population

15,931
18,561
15,639
15,109
15,791
16,534
15,904
18,337

Emmet County's past growth represents a long period of population stability,
despite two World Wars, a major depression and other volitile national growth
influences. In the decades from 1930 to 1970, the population increased 14.6%,
yet the 1910 population was 230 persons higher than in 1970.
Emmet County is composed of sixteen Townships ranging in size from 185
citizens to a population of 2,450. The past growth pattern of these communities
varied from one another, some increasing gradually while others lost population .

•

-2-

-J.

�TABLE 2 illustrates the recent history of population growth among the
communities of the County . Only four townships have increased in population in
each Census year between 1930 and 1970 These are the townsh ips of Little
Traverse, Littlefield, Resort and Springvale. Bear Creek Township and West
Traverse Township have experienced consistent growth since 1940. Between 1950
and

1960, eight townships reported population decreases. Since 1960, six

townships reported declines.

TABLE 2
POPULATION TRENDS: 1930 - 1970
Emmet County &amp; Civil Divisions
60 to 70

Townsh ips :
Bear Creek
Bl iss
Carp Lake
Center
Cross V illage
Friendship
Little Traverse
Littlefield
McKin~ly
Maple River
Pleasantview
Readmond
Resort
Springvale
WaWatam
West T raverse

Change
Number Percent

1930

1940

1950

1960

1,227
399
374
442
323
336
440
691
1,121
538
165
362
656
298
298
270

1,204
421
431
425
290
428
481
835
980
540
207
440
708
371
343
245

1,756
355
524
307
228
297
575
842
845
415
114
352
387
397
319

1,859
298
464
215
140
318
602
906
843
335
198
246
748
467
368
326

591
-16
-25
134
45
78
383
360
-8
80
-74
-12
251
196
63
94

31 8%
-54%
-5 4%
62 3%
32 .1%
-24 .5%
63 6%
39 7%
-0 .9%
23 .9%
-37 4%
-4 .9%
34 9%
42 0%
17 1%
28 8%

2,450
282
439
349
185
240
985
1,266
835
415
124
234
1,009
663
431
420

7,940

8,349

8,440

8,333

1,984

23 8%

10,327

287
1,429

330
1,423

319
1,626

290
1,433

72
229

24 8%
16 0%

362
1,662

283
810
5,740

326
562
6,019

365
442
6,468

336
429
6,138

-6

-1 8%

40
204

9.3%
3 3%

330
469
6,342

7,169

7,442

8,094

7,571

433

5 7%

8,004

15,109

15,791

16,594

15,904

2,427

15 3%

18,331

727

1970

Cities &amp; Villages :

* A lanson
Harbor Springs
*Mackinaw City
(pt)
*Pellston
Petoskey City

NOTE : Villages indicated with * are included with their respective Townships,
and not added under the category subtotals for ··c1 t1es and villages"

�L

- ,.- :,..,..

y·~

r:• -;_:;j

1,; __

·-

~~ l:.~

r :· -

r.... ~,J
·-

. ·-· .J

C..

....... .

:..-"...:....·

-; ~

),:.,........._ ..

I;~~-

·-

L .J

-:~

r·.

--r

....~

[_

'

1•• ~~

i, · ,

I
I

!
50

~

40

---·-

EMM E T

CO U NTY

S TA TE

Of

50

MI C HI G AN

40

"'

Cl

.._

.....,

::,

'·
C)

0..

30

30

.,
.._"
...
...

20

"'"'
"&lt;t
"'0..

10

Cl

C,

19.0

9 .3

/ ~/,l

__,,

-

~

__,,/,:j

-1/~ /~/41

....,../41_..,/.A-~,-1

1950

19 50

.....

....,..~~/,,I

~

~

....,..
~/~/,,I

....,..~~/21

20

--

o~---

0
1940

1950

1960

UNDER -5
PR E -

SCH O OL

A GE

1960

19 4 0

15 - 2 4

5 - I4

ELEME N TARY
SC H OO L

1960

A GE

HI GH

1950

1960

1940

2 5 - 44

S CH OOL

FA MIL Y

45 - 6 4

FORM IN G

MA T URE

FAM ILI ES

AN O

POPULATION IN CRITICAL

EMMET COUNTY
19 4 0
I

65 6 OVE R
RETI R E ME NT
AGE

YOUN G AOUL T S

.

10

19 5 0

AGE GROUPS

MICHIGAN
1960

'

�Population losses since 1960 occurred

in

the townships of Bliss, Carp Lake,

Friendship, Mc Kinley, Pleasant View, and Readmond Those that experienced
increases, exceeded the growth rates of the cities and villages Little T (·averse and
Center Townships increased by a rate over 60%. WaWatam Township had the
lowest percent increase at 17 .1%, which exceeded the County average of 15.3% .
In the order of importance, the largest numerical population gains occurred in
Bear Creek Township, Little T raverse "Township, Littlefield Township, Resort
Township, Harbor Springs, Petoskey, Springvale Township and Center Township

AGE GROUPS
Some of the population age group data which characterized Emmet County in
1960 1s described below This data should be re-evaluated when the results of the
1970 Census become available .

1.

Pr-eschool Age (Under 5 Years)
In 1960, 12 4% of Michigan's population was under five years of age . West
Traverse Township had 16% In the order of highest percentage, Springvale,
Bear Cr-eek, WaWatam, Resort and F-·iendsh1p Townships also exceeded the
State average P:easantv1ew, Center and C'. oss Village Townships reported
fewer than 6% of the population 1n this age group

2.

School Age to Young Adults (5 to 24 Years)
Both the County and S1ate have 33 .7% of the ir population 1n the school age
- young adult group . E:even of the 16 townships have higher than average
proportions, with Readmond, F~1endship, West T·averse, B;iss, Center, and
Resort Townships exceeding 36%

3.

Family Forming or Young Labor Force (25 to 44 Years)
A

consistent

population

disparity

with

State

averages

in

northern

communities is the family forming or young labor force population groups
The S1.ate reported 26 .5% of the 1960 population 1n th is group, v;hile
Emmet County reported 21 8% .
Only Pleasantview Township exceeds the S 1 ate average, with 53% of the
population aged 25 to 44 years

In contrast. C· oss Village and Center

Townships have less than 16% of their population 1n this age group
-4 -

�-

,

(1

. I

rn

4.

Nearly 21% of the County population is aged 45 to 64 years, which
compares closely with the State's proportion of 19.2%. Township
proportions range from the low 11.6% in Pleasantview to the high of 26 .5%
in Center . In general, Northern Michigan communities have the higher

Jq:.:.J

IJ
In
(]
li2

·• -1

._r-;

I]

Mature Family Group (45 to 64 years)

proportions of mature family aged groups and Emmet County reflects this
pattern.
5.

Retirement Age Group (65 and over)
Emmet County has a significantly higher proportion of retirement age
citizens than the State ( 12.1% compared with 8.1%) . Only two townships
have percentages lower than the State average: Pleasantview with 3% and
Friendship with 7.9% . Cross Village has the highest proportion with 27 .1%.
A large proportion of retirement age citizens is also typical of northern area
communities.

PROJECTIONS

r'-,

( (- I
;:_~

For the purposes of the Emmet County Comprehensive Plan, four population
projections to 1990 were completed for a 22 year projection period, beginning
with 1968. These were done before 1970 Census data was available The results of
the various methods are summarized in TABLE 3.

.I -_
.

TABLE 3

'

~

l

SUMMARY OF COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS
EMMET COUNTY

:··1I
;

:

""'
Projection Method

I:'.

IrJ
I~
I,:
r .

Long-Term Ai·ithmetic
Long-Term (Dept of Commerce)
Short-Term Arithmetic
Short-Term Ratio Apportionment
Average

•

;__J

1970

1990

Population

Projection

15,904
15,904
15,904
15,904

18,331
18,331
18,331
18,331

16,700
18,180
21,890
22,000
19,940

l
I
,__,

I

1960
Population

-5-

�If the four projection methods are averaged, the 1990 population would total
19,940 persons. As a general conclusion, the short-range projection techniques
appear to be the most accurate in view of the 1970 total population . It the
current pace of growth continues, the 1990 "average'' projection figure will be
reached by 1980.
It was assumed that the Michigan Department of Commerce projections for the
Civil Divisions of Emmet County would be reasonable working estimates of future
population. These are presented along with the adjusted population for
communities in the Petoskey Area on TABLE 4, "Projections for County Civil
Divisions." The 1970 population Census strongly indicates that many Civil
Divisions are growing more rapidly than the Department of Commerce figures
indicate . In any event, it should be recognized that projections for smaller
community areas are tenuous and more subject to inaccurate results A lso, the
process of apportioning a total County population of less than 20,000 persons
among 18 communities is always a questionable procedure
With the adjustments made for Petoskey, Bear Creek Township and Resort
Township, the total projected 1990 County population is 22,500. This figure will
be used for the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan . It is reasonable, but slightly
conservative in view of the 242 .7 person per year growth experienced since 1960.

OTHER CHARACTERISTICS
1.

Commuting Patterns
According to the 1960 U.S . Census of Population, 262 workers commuted
to jobs outside of Emmet County (5 5% of the employed workers)
Comparative commuting rates in adJoinint Counties are: 6 0% 1n Otsego,
7.5% in Cheboygan, and 11.3% in Charlevoix . It may be concluded that a
comparatively high rate of persons who work in the County live in the
County. Hence, a new employment source in Emmet County will attract
employees and families into the County as well .

2.

Density
For each resident in Emmet County, there are 16.2 acres of land
Considerably less per capita area is available when the influx of tourists is
included . Based on an analysis of selected residential blocks, density reaches
the following levels by community:

-6-

�TABLE 4
PROJECTIONS FOR COUNTY CIVIL DIVISIONS
EMMET COUNTY

County Civil Divisions

I;
'

I:

1960
Population

Bear Creek Township
Bliss Township
Carp Lake Township
Center Township
Cross Village Township
Friendship Township
Little Traverse Township
Littlefield Township (Alanson)
McKinley Township
Maple River Township
Pleasantview Township
Readmond Township
Resort Township
Springvale Township
WaWatam Township
West Traverse Township
Harbor Springs (City)
Petoskey (City)
Total County

19901
Projection

1990 Projection2
Adjusted for
Petoskey Area
Projections

1,859
298
464
215
140
318
602
906
843
335
198
246
748
467
368
326
1,433
6,138

2,630
247
582
94
65
238
770
1,040
810
226
165
150
860
565
450
400
1,750
7,138

5,050

2,380
Low
3,165
Low
Low
7,520

15,904

18,180

22,502

Low
Low
4,387
Low
Low

1Michigan Department of Commerce ProJections. The 1970 U.S. Census provides
a basis for re-evaluating the projection results for Civil Divisions.
2Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc., ProJect1ons for the Petoskey Area Planning
Commission, and comments based on 1970 Census findings .

-7-

'·
I.....

�Selected
Community

Land per Dwelling

10,000 sq .ft .
12,500 SQ ft .
7,650 sq ft
15,000 sq ft .
6,600 sq .ft .
9,720 SQ ft .
12,860 SQ ft
6,000 SQ ft .
12,500 sq ft
15,000 sq .ft .

Alanson
Brutus
Conway
Cross Village
Pellston
Levering
Oden
Pon-she-wa-1 ng (Oden)
Paradise Lake
Van

Dwellings
per Acre

4 ,3
35
57
2.9
66
4.5
34
73
3.5
2.9

The foregoing density 11st is based on sample blocks 1n areas where there are no
community water or sewer systems. W1th1n each community area, 1nd1v1dual
homes may be sited on either smaller or larger sites
Households and Family Size
In 1960, there were 4,696 households 1n Emmet County as reported in the US
Census of Populat ion Dividing the population 1n households by the number of
households gives an average population per household of 3 33 persons This
compares with other commun,ties as follows :

Community

Average Number of Persons
per Household in 1960

1950 to 1960
Percent Change

3 42
3 33
3 35
349
3 31

+24 .9%
2.1%
· 03%
+ 6 5%
+21 3%

The State of M 1ch1gan
Emmet County
Charlevoix County
Cheboygan County
Grand Traverse County

Comparat ively, the County has a low population per household, and had been
decreasing through 1960 This trend may or may not be continuing through 1970,
but is probably influenced by: fewer young people l1v1ng on farms, increased
retirement age population, high proportion of retirement age citizens, and the
in-migration of students at North Central Michigan College

-8-

�~Lr,-=====

J'itaU::: · ~.ci~
.·-~0 · ,

..•
u

.

~

,gc&lt;~~~w

AlNno~

,.,,,,

:{r::

.-

·

◄
,)

•

•

.

i

.

~

l1

.....

,

u

►

.."• ..• ..

'

J

◄

..•"
.• ...

e

0

%

..,~ ..~"

J

.,
" • ..,ll ...!."'
0

~

..,

0
%

~

J
J

►

►

:,
0

◄

"'

•• ..-"
u

◄
:,

u

i

0

.."
"
0

►

L

:,

:,

~

"0 •:,"

►

z

. ..,., ....

.,
.;
" .., ..,
0:

~

u

"
◄

u

0

z

"'
"'

◄

0

:,

,

.. ..., " ..,... : " ..
"'
" .,
., ◄
.,.., .... .., "'
"'.."' ....,"
"'
.. .. ., ..
◄

·z

.,

z

0

2

Cl

◄

u

0

u

::;

:,

~

:,

◄

u

:,

ll
ll
0

u

◄

i

:,

0

!

w
en
:::&gt;
0

z

&lt;t
_J

"'
"'

&gt;(!)~

~

"'

...

....

~

..
~
~

~

..

z::,

..

0

-u

t-

...
..,

C/)t-

~
~

x2

-LI.I

w~
..
....0..x::"
.,_

.~ C
, 0

·I

I :;

~~

/

·••1
/

7

C
0

.

..

0"

E

.! ...

."
c·c

.~:

!;~

�-

I
I

-

EXISTING LAND USE

I

-

The accompanying map prepared under an FHA Planning Grant program,
illustrates the generalized land use pattern of Emmet County . TABLE 5
summarizes the acreages and proportions of uses by township areas and

I

city-vi II age areas. It is noted that, whenever city-vi IIage data is statistically

-

included . No land use data for the Cheboygan side has been tabulated; however, it

I

-

l

I

portrayed, only that portion of Mackinaw City which lies

L

Emmet County is

was inventoried on field maps. Data for Petoskey and Harbor Springs were taken
from land use studies prepared for those communities under separate "701"
Urban Planning Assistance Grants.
Inventory Techniques
The study of land use in the Comprehensive Plan has several obJectives related to
understanding the County's present development and guiding future planning
decisions. Foremost, the land use inventory provides both a graphic and statistical
picture of the County, emphasizing the impact of man-made features.
TABLE 5
EXISTING LANO USE
EMMET COUNTY

r

I

in

All Townships

Cities &amp; Villages

Total County

(acres)

(acres)

(acres)

Percent
Developed
Total

1,391
778
2,357
2 .754
7.372
203
429
374
4,830

703
_
37
154
301
206
129
114
102
635

2 ,094
815
2,511
3,055
7,578
332
543
476
5,465

9 .1%
3.6%
10.9%
13.4%
33.1%
1.5%
2.4%
2. 1%
23.9%

20,488

2.381

22,869

100.0%

Vacant, Farm &amp;
Forest
,453
Surface Water

258,932
262,415
9,485

301

88.9%
9,756

3.3%

Grand Total

288,905

6,135

295,040

100.0%

Residential
Seasonal Homes
P•.i blic
Quasi-Public
Recreation
Commercial
Industrial
Rai lroads
Roads
Total U~es

7.8%

SOURCE : Vilican-Laman &amp; A;;sociates, Inc .. f9rmers Home Admin istrat•on ComP!ehensive s.,wer and Water
Plan for Emmet County, Aoril, 1971. Field data current through November, 1969.

-9-

�-1
'. I
The inventory of existing land use was accomplished by field inspections,
conducted during the summer of 1968 However, the map was not published until
October, 1969 Each use of land was recorded on field maps and later transcribed
to base maps . The field inspection technique is not 100% accurate, since all uses
,n buildings are not apparent from the street and there may be uses 1n wooded
areas and on large private properties generally inaccessible by vehicle Common
limitations are accurate counts of apartments vv1th1n multiple-family dwellings
and seasonal homes 1n forested areas Overall, however, the field inspection
technique is a valuable means of assessing the character of uses, and it consumes
less time and cost than other inventory systems (such as reviewing all tax records
or photographic interpretation). Nevertheless, aerial photographs, U.S.G .S maps,
and interviews of local officials were used to resolve questions on property usage .
It should be noted that the use of land changes continually 1n all communities;
hence, the data must be viewed in terms of the date 1nventoried

~

Emmet County 's total land area 1s 461 square miles, which

~&amp;

squ11.,e1l~lalt to

295,040 acres . Of this area, less than eight percent 1s used for housing, business,
~

industry, community services, recreation, and transportation. Another three
percent is in major surface water area, including inland lakes and the c,ooked
River Some 88 .9% of the County 1s land classified as Vacant, Farm and Forest .
Vacant, Farm and Forest lands are most apt to be consumed by other uses as the
County develops. Soils, topography, land ownership and the economic strength of
farming will determine those lands that will be consumed first .
As an illustration of existing County development, all of the County's roads,
highways, railroads, parks. airports, and other land uses, except farmed or
forested land could roughly fit into the area of one Townsh,p (McKinley, for
example) .

At the present time, the cities and villages of the County have over 3,453 acres of
undeveloped land . It future permanent housing were to concentrate in vii Iage-city
areas where central utility services may be available or could be provided, the
County could absorb nearly 8,000 new families without losing one acre of farm
land. The townships, of course, have vast areas of open land that could be
developed .

The character of land use in the County 1s strongly oriented to tourism recreation;
however, the County also reflects some diverse development conditions

For

example, the County is a thinly populated rural area, yet there are highly
sophisticated developments (major ski resorts, exclusive vacation home
developments, jet air service, freeways, and selective retail stores) that function 1n
close proximity to farming enterprises, forest industries and mining .

· -10-

�c(

r.·] '
r~

'--

\

' .l

::J

Emmet County has a diverse resource base that is well adapted to year-around
recreation attractions. Th is fact, plus the increasing accessibility of the County to
tourists from metropolitan centers will cause accelerated development pressures
on the existing resource base . The momentum of rising tourism, crowded
metropolitan

centers,

new highways, and

irrproved

air service may well

precipitate local development related to industry and factors other than tourism
recreation .

Emmet County's resource base must be viewed as an important element of the

_~

ecological structure of Michigan and the Upper Midwest. Deer hunting, fishing,

~

natural scenery, other outdoor recreat ion, and clean waters represent major

~

attra~~ ~ ~11::'!~~iv-~·

factors in the local economy and are
demands upon the r
environment . AsJ\~ ~ o rth fre m
~ end fsl et1 e~t
.
on the County can be expected
to increase substantially .
tu...e ~ ~ J '

I

The accompanying map, "Selected Resource Inventory," illustrates deer yarding
1-...

areas, trout streams, warm water fish streams, canoeable rivers and principal
drainage basins. Generally, deer yarding areas, canoeable waters and quality trout

~

. i
•• 1

streams are concentrated in nearly the same County locations These resource
areas also provide habitat for other game species native to Northern Michigan.
The drainage patterns on the map relate rivers and streams to their principal
watershed areas It 1s important that land users in the County recognize these
drainage patterns as certain activities may contribute to stream pollution- ~
resource depletion . The County cannot afford these losses if it is to retain ~
Northern image so attractive to urban populations which tour the United States.

-11'

.

'

�I
•

'I

SOILS
The accompanying "Soil Resources" map illustrates a refinement of the County's
Land Type map, and presents ten ( 10) relatively homogeneous soi I groups. These
soil classifications are based upon their general physical similarity . Soils in a group
have similar capacity to sustain urban uses and resources development. This map
gives a broad picture of the distribution and comparative quantity of County soil
resources. Because of the generalized nature of the mapped information, it is

II
I
I

applicable to County planning as an overall development guide or reference. More
detailed soils surveys and/or on-site investigations are needed for specific uses and
site planning .
In determining the general suitability of soils in their nature state for various uses,
the following criterion are applied by soil scientists of the U.S. Soil Conservation
Service :

1. Adaptability for Agriculture
2. Adaptability for Housing (subdivision type)
3. Adaptability for Woodland and Forest Use
4. Adaptability for Recreation
A summary rating of the ten ( 10) generalized Soi I Resource Arnas is presented on
TABLE 6.
It is pertinent that about 70% of the area of Emmet County has soil conditions
suited to urban development uses. This also 1mpl1es a general suitability for
forestry, agriculture and recreation .

r--

:~:~;

}

t~n~ ,::~r d~::~:p:~~~,~~:,hi:v~~~~~.~~::~.~~%t~:~h;i~:i~i;~e:~i;:

expected to absorb most of the projected urban development in the County .
However, 1t is unfortunate that many of these same soils rated very good for
farming and forestry and

c; ~ :~g:

~

l~

~

e~ ~ L ( . L J ) £ . .~
.

~

devel~,r;p~
means that -:,;ki @nsle-ts aAd
e development can procee~with /(~ soil lim~
s. However, the :re
are other planning considerations necessary to assure that..-ReW developments do
not destroy the quality of the natural environment., vY•l=~·rel:i---gen-era1e's demanEls--f-o
~ Deer- yarding area~

~
(}A.I~~~~

µ_J-

~
~

- - - . . .½ st land areas in the central and west central portions of Emme_t C untyl\.are well
suited for

.,J

~'11 !!:f!~ r - l i K , will 1999g_

~~ AtJ\5/tWH .?'I
.d+t- ~ ~~ .-12-

1
I

�I
TABLE 6
COUNTY SOIL RESOURCES
EMMET COUNTY

I
I

Use Rating or Adaetabili!l'.

'

Agriculture

Subdividing

Woodland

Recreation

G0od
Fair-Good
Fai r-Good
Poor
Poor

Good
Good
Good
Good-Fair
Fair-Good

Hardwoods
Hardwoods &amp; Pi ne
Hardwoods &amp; Pine
Poor
Poor

Good
Good
Good
Good
Fair-P.:&gt;o r

Good
Good
Good
Fair-Good
Fair

Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor

Fair-Poor
.Poor
Poor
Poor
Poor

Pom
Poor
Fair
Poor
Poor

Fair-Poor
Good
Fair-Good
Fair-Good
Game
H3b1tat

Poor
Good
Poor
Poor
Poor

.I

1

.1

1. Sandy Loam
2. Loamy S'3nd
3. Deep Loamy Sand
4. Deep A cid Sands
5. Sand &amp; Gravel
6. Sand Gravel over
Bedrock
7. Sand D11nes
8. Silts, Clays, Sand
9 . Si lty Clay Loam
10. Organic Soil

D~

SOURCE : U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Boyne City, M ichigan

Crooked Lake, Pickerel Lake, and the Crooked River V
positioned among wet soils rated fair to poor for
intensive resort-cottage area, pollution control measures will become increasingl y
necessary and a strong need is alread y apparent .
The Cross Village area is divided among several so il types: Sandy loams, loose
sand, and organic soils. The organic soils are generally in St ate ownership and
hence, may not be a development problem . However, the loose sands, which
occur in dunes and ridges have many development limitations in terms of drifting
_ j

sand (wind, erosion) and difficu lty in establishing and maintaining cover .
Development of these soils will reduce the high scenic value of the area, as many
dunes will be leveled and existing tree stands will gradually be reduced.
The Mackinaw City area and WaWatam Township are on limestone formations
and cobbly soils. These are generally unsuitable for urban development in the ir
natural state. Carefu l and deta iled so ils ana lysis can reveal the nature of
development l1m1tations on particular sites

__,
A large proportion of the soils unsuited for development are in the north areas of
the County . Also, much of this land is currently in State of Michigan ownership,
as part of the Hardwood State Forest.

-13-

�I
TOPOGRAPHY
The accompanying topography map illustrates the slope characteristics of Emmet
County's landscape. From a County-wide view, there is a great deal of variety in
land formations, wh ich include: level lands, gently rolling, rolling to steep, and
very steep slopes. Elevation gradually increases from north to south, with some of
the highest hilltops in Pleasantview and Springvale Townships.

I

•'

•
.1

The discussion which follows describes the topographic characteristics of each
Township in the County . As a general statement, there are a number of areas that
have limitations to urban density development. However, these limitations
become scenic attractions in communities that cater to tourism-recreation
activities .
Topography in Resort Township is gently rolling with picturesque
contrasts between cultivated farm land and patches of wooded area . Some
steep landscape follows the Lake Michigan Shoreline, mostly in the

Resort -

Penn-Dixie mining area, where extensive deposits of limestone are found .
Land forms in Bear Creek Township tend to be more severe than in
Resort, but most of the steep topography lies well south and southeast of
Petoskey.

Bear Creek -

Except for areas generally within two miles of Crooked Lake,

Springvale -

Pickerel Lake, and the Minihaha Creek Valley, Springvale Township is
influenced by steep slopes
Moderate to steep slopes exist in the extreme northwest area, but
overall, there are few serious slope limitations.

Littlefield -

Little Traverse - Southern sections in this Township are generally level or gently

rolling, with incidences of steep slope . A large area of steep topography
affects the northeast area .
West Traverse - West Traverse Township varies from roll ing to steep and is steep

in most sections. The roll ing and gentl y rolling land is found north and east
of Harbor Springs.,
Friendship is characterized by moderately steep
topography . There are inc idences of level and gently roll ing land .

Friendship

-

-14-

to steep

I
I

�I:
'

I

~~

~
~

ti
~ _.

Pleasantview -

A band of nearly level land extends north-south through the

community . Steep to very steep topography is found in the areas where
Boyne Highlands and Nubs Nob are located . Moderate to steep slopes are
also present .
Maple River - The west one-third of this community has moderate to moderately

steep topography but few steep areas . The land character in the east sections
is level with some incidence of swamp . The western third is moderately
steep .
McKinley - Swamp land is positioned along the east line and level drier sections

extend along the south line. Some moderately rolling land exists in the
northwest area .
Center -

A wide band of level land (high incidence of swamp) traverses the

community from southeast to northwest, and this is flanked by moderately
steep slopes .
Readmond -

Readmond Township is characterized by moderately steep slopes

and there are incidences of swamp .Gently rolling and moderate slopes are
found in the north and west areas.
Cross Village - Steep topograph y is limited to the McCort Hill area in Section 5

and in portions of Sections 2 and 3 A steep ridge parallels the shore of Lake
Michigan from the south to the Wycamp Lake area . Roll ing sand dunes are
found in the northern sections .
_J

Bliss Township is predominantl y level to moderate with incidences of
swamp and steep slope .

Bliss -

1
--l
.,
q
d

Carp Lake -

Gently rolling to moderately rolling topograph y is present in the

southwesterl y sections. The remainder of the community is re lativel y level .
WaWatam - The topograph y map reveals onl y a gradua l fal l in elevation from the

southeast to north and northwest .

..,..
-15-

�1
The foregoing analysis of the Couniy's physiography 1s limited 1n respect to

I

•

detail. U.S.G.S. data on a County-wide scale at the twenty-foot contour interval is
effective as a general reference for slope data, but cannot illustrate the variety of
slope change that can occur w1th1n a given twenty-foot interval .

WATER
In Emrnet County, a prime use of water resources 1s for recreation, mainly in
terms of swimm ing, boating, fishing and wildlife management However, water
resources are necessary for. municipal water systems; 1nd1v1dual wells, and

.I

irr1gat1on Hence, 1t is essential tl-1at the County'~ w1ter resources be protected
trom pollution and depletion
Lake Michigan 1s a major Vvater reserve for recreation as well as a potential
municipal water supply . At. present, all domestic water supplies 1n the County are
from wel I resources.

On the basis of general state-wide data prepared by the Water Resources
Comm1ss1on of the M 1ch1gan Department of Natural Resources, most of the area
of Emrret County 1s in glacial deposit areas with fairly high yields of ground
water Low yield areas are found mostly 1n Resort Townsh,p , IN:JWatam Township
and northern Bl •ss 'T ownsh1p . However, 1nd1v1dua1 wells 1n specific locations may
have h,gri or low yields depending on local geologic cond1t1ons.
In addition to Lake M 1ch1gan and ground water resources, Emmet County has
seven (7) inland lakes, of which three are positioned 1n urban growth areas
(Round Lake. C:·ooked Lake and Pickerel L3kel A !so, the US Soil Conservation
Service has 1dent1f 1ed n·ne (9) potent,al water 1mpoundment locations on the
rivers of the County .

AGRICULTURE
Farming and agr ,cultural act •v111es have two maJor influences on each community
F 1rst 1s the income derived for rural families and other serv ices tha1 are supported
by farming . Second 1s the value of farms as a resource for open space, wildlife
support, and environmental break w•th developed urban areas
Farming has become a h ighl y complex operat,on requiring skilled operators and
huge investments 1n mechanical equ 1pment and land This ,s evidenced by the fact
that the average value of farms in Emmet County increased 135% between 1954
and 1964.
-16

1/'\

�..: .

.

. . ..

. ....

...

,.;..

-· --·

-

--

.

'7

I
I

•

Part of the trend in agriculture can be observed from TABLE 7, which
summarizes selected farm data for Emmet County . In the ten years between 1954
and 1964, the average size of farms increased by nearly fifty acres or 32% .
Overall, there was a 51% decrease in the number of farms in the County .

In
:__J

Employment also decreased markedly . In 1950, the U.S. Census listed 632
persons employed as farmers and farm managers. Bv 1960, th is occupation group
declined to 228 for a percentage loss of 64% . The results of the 1970 Census will
be interesting.
While farm size has been increasing and the number of farms and total acreage has
been decreasing, farm production has been increasing along with the average farm
value . This is a good index of the economic advantages of the large-scale farm and
why this tend is taking place - better and more productive ye ilds.

TABLE 7
SELECTED FARM CHARACTERISTICS
EMMET COUNTY

Farm Census
1954
1964

Farms by Size

1--;

l ;·i
'

!

"L0'

1~.
'

G

1954 to 1964
Change
Number Percent

1 - 99 acres
100 - 499 acres
500 - 999 acres
1,000 acres
and over

382
439
13

145
247
17

-237
-192
+4

-62%
-44%
+31%

3

4

+1

+33%

Total

837

413

-424

-51%

123,478

80,841

42%

27%

148

196

Land in Farms
Percent of County
Land in Farms
Average Size
of Farm in acres
Average Value of
Farms
Farm Operators
residing on Farm
Persons in Farm
Operator Households

-35%

+48

+32%

$7,019 $16,698 +$9,680

+136%

512

389

-123

-24%

1,682

SOURCE · U.S. Census of Agriculture

I

k i

-17-

I

I:

�I
~
Between 1959 and 1964. the value of farm crops sold increased nearly 38%,
compared with 23% t or the State of Michigan . The trend since 1954, however, Is
not as optimistic as there was a decline from 1954 to 1959, and an increase
between 1959 and 1964.

Of the two categories, livestock and crops, It Is evident that livestock farms are
most valuable . Between 1959 and 1964, I 1vestock farm product sales increased
$528,000 compared with $208,000 for crops. Dairy and poultry were the most
important growth factors, as other livestock increased slightly
Field crops accounted for over 60% of the sales increase among crops Forest
products and vegetables gained some, while fruits and nuts experienced sales
decreases
A f inal assessment of the value of agriculture to Emrnet County can be established
from a general rule of thumb, that each dollar earned In farming turns over 2 3
times Hence. the $2.07 mi ll Ion produced from farm sales in the County nas an
estimated multipl ied impact of some $4,761,000

Tn•s ,s a s1gn 1f1cant loca l

economic factor that should be retained to the extent possible

1,. is reasonable to conclude that the value of farm land wil l increase as a result of
tourist demands tor rural land . This will cause farm acreage to decline further,
lessening

the

impact

of

agriculture

as

well

On

the

other

hand ,

national-international demands for farm products may gi ve new economic
incentives for preserving and expanding vital agricultural act IvIty
In terms of the relative importance of agriculture , Emmet C.:-unty ranked 57th
among the 82 counties In farm product sales Hence , 57 count,es are agr ,culturall y
more significant Another index shows that Emmet County has a high oercentage
of non-farm income to supplement farm product sales ( 17th of 82) l his inde x
shows decreasing re!iance upon farming act 1vIty for basic income

18-

~

'
'I
I
-I
I
~.
•
•

I

•

J

:·,~~

�I
I

! !

~
I

RESIDENTIAL

By intent, the Residential P!an is quantitative to the extent of accommodating

j

projected housing demands. It. is qualitative in that residential areas should be

I

desirable places to encourage home investment and provide a sound family living
environment.

I
I
I

URBAN DEVELOPMENT PROCESS

]

I

l1
·'
;

I·,
I

The development of Township areas begins with the influx of nonfarm dwellings
which locate along paved County roads, usually on one to five acre lots. This gives
the roadside an appearance of being developed, but most of the land behing the
homes remains undeveloped for long periods of time, perhaps farmed or forested
The problems of the rural nonfarm developments which are distant from an urban
center relate to planning for resources and community services. Homes developing
along County roads are spread over a wide area, and the smaller lots w ith
driveways create numerous access points from the roadway . This reduces the
traffic efficiency of the County road by slowing vehicles, generating on-off
turning movements, and multiplies the accident potentials. In time, the solution
may be expensive road widening or by-pass proiects .

I;
The scattered growth pattern compl icates the problem of providing schools, and

I-·
1·1

shopping services. School bus services must be increased, perhaps two marginal
retail stores are required when one economically eff icient store would offer better
services, and there are public conflicts involved 1n locating school buildings, parks,
churches, and the like Each family desires to have the service nearest his home .

_,j

Ii
l

The problems of resource development and resource conservation are also
complicated by scatered rural nonfarm housing . When homes are scattered ,
community sewer and water systems become too costly; thus, septic tank effluent
increases and has a greater opportun ity to enter streams and lakes resulting 1n

I·:

pollution . Moreover, the 1nabil1ty to offer central utility services reduces the
area's potential to attract industry and business O! significance is that the

~

fract1onalization process may impact qua li t y farm and forest land and reduce the

_,

__,

County's ability to produce food and fibre for local and national markets.

I.!

..

·,

I
I

-19 -

�CONCEPTS

Emmet County's total population approximates the conceptual size of four or
five urban ne ighborriood units; hence, the strict application of neighbortiood
planning theory has less meaning than 1n urban areas Nonetheless, the principles
and objectives embodied in the concept are applicable as guides 1n nearly all
community housing situat ,ons, particularly •n and near the c 1t1es of Petoskey and
Harbor Springs.

I

Bv defin1t1on, a neignborhood unit 1s a cont iguous residential area w ith sufficient
population to support one centrally located elementary school The school
facil ity should be designed with a park and playground Heavily traveled streets.
ra ilroads

and

nonresidential

land

uses

should

not be

located

w 1th 1n a

neighborhood un it, although these uses of land may serve as logical ne ighborhood
boundaries
A ,though there are many ind•v1dual concepts and desi res regard•ng the ideal
home, most famil ies demand rousing that has urban ut il it ies, ,s near schools, 1s
close to shopping, is protected from through traffic, and ,s accessible to hosp itals.
places of wo' k and related conven,ence factors Tr,e residential areas proposed for
Emmet County are intended to meet th•s demand
The d 1scuss1on of res •dent1al concepts 1n terms o f ne ighborhood units 1s only
partly appl 1cab le to Emmet County , because of the rura l nature of the County
and the recreation qualities of the non -urban areas There 1s tar more potential
res idential land in Emmet County than what can possibl y be developed w1th1n the
foreseeable future, and substantial demands will accrue trom vacation homes
Therefore, ,t wou ld be good policy to consider th e following development
cond1t1ons ·
1

Recogn ize the fact that all land 1n the County will not and should not be
developed That which is developed should f it into logical service areas for
schools, parks. shopp ing and related

2.

Scenic resources are integral elements of the County 's economy

These

should be protected so that the characte r of the County remains attractive
and desirable for both permanent residents and v, s1tors

3.

Wtld l1fe 1s important 1n Emmet Co unty as are forest and vegetative resources
Hence, swamp lands. wooded areas, streams. and related resources must be
protected from pollution and dep letion

-20 -

J

··.:i

�t:
11,.J~
. 1

~
~
~

4.

View existing undeveloped lake-river frontages as resources to be protected .
Encourage water oriented development to form in cluster patterns, rather
than parcel off the frontage on a 100% ind 1vidual access basis

5.

County roads provide access to farms and nonfarm homes

in

rural areas .

Development usually follows existing roads until the frontage is used up and
large internal vacant areas remain . Preferably, minor service roads and cluster

, .1

developments snould extend from the County road rather than serve

i,J

individual unit frontage . The recreation community of " Hidden Hamlet" at
Nubs Nob is an example of this development concept.

17

. 1

DEMANDS
In 1960, Emmet County was a community of 15,904 persons who occupied
4,696 households (3.33 persons per household) . Since 1960, the County
population increased by 2,427 persons for an estimated 690 dwelling units In the
past ten years (69 per year) . Population projections for Emmet County show a
possible 22,500 persons by 1990. This will generate a demand for some 1,380
dwellings in the next twenty years . Past growth trends suggest that most of the
permanent housing demand wi ll impact the urban areas around Petoskey and

17

Harbor Spr ings
In 1960, Emmet County's housing census reported 2,560 seasonal housing units.
This represented some 32% of all hous ing in the County The rural nonfarm areas
had 47% of their housing class1f 1ed as seasonal . Comparable data on seasonal
dwellings constructed since 1960 is not readily available; however, a substantial
number of seasonal homes were constructed In Chalet Villages near ski resorts, on
inland lakes, and along the Lake Michigan Shore . Some of these may wel l convert
to year-around residences for permanent families of either retirement or labor
force age .
For res1dent1al planning purposes, it can be expected that urban residential
demands will be greatest
of

in

and near P8toskey, moderate

in

the community areas

Harbor Springs and A lanson, and slight 1n the outlying rural service

communities and Mackinaw City .
The type of home most in demand is tor th ree bedrooms and over (80% to 90% of

I

the market). Only 10% of the market Is for etf1c1ency, one-bedoom and/or

j

L

,

two-bedroom units. 1 There Is a strong demand for three and four-bedroom homes
for famil ies with incomes under $6,000 per y ear

1Mr . Ken Peterson, Realtor and Mr Cy Jordan, from questionnaire interviews assessing the real estate market 1n the five-year period prior to January, 1969
' .
......

-21-

�~-1
I

Recreation home demands will be strongest in those areas that have multiple
recreati on use potential. Hence, a vacation home that can offer ready access to
skiing f acilities, swimming beaches, scenic views, forests, hunting and fishing, will
be in greatest demand.

RESIDENTIAL AREAS PLAN
The "R esidential Areas Pian " map illustrates several factors that will influence the
configurations of future housing areas in the County .These are :
Resource areas that should remain

in

~~

t
-I
I

a natural condition to support broad

scale resource management programs, and ecological balance .

,1

A highly tentative alignment for a future express type highway through the
County . (See the County 's "Future Land U:-e Pian" Map for the suggested
alternate .)
The basic County road - State Highway network which interconnects the
functional land use areas ot the County .
Key resort attractions and facil 1t1es wherein seasonal home construction 1s
likely to continue
Exi sting urban communit ies and concentrated housing areas
The above factors vvere rrepped and evaluated 1n terms of soil resources,
topography, deer yard areas, quality fish streams and existing land use

On the basis of the above, a general 1zed pattern of logical future housing areas
evolved. lri the communities of Petoskey, Bear Creek Township, and Resort
T ownship, the R8s1dential P.an is based on Neighborhood and Residential P,ans
for those communities 1 These Petoskey A '. ea tina,ngs are cons idered to be a part
of the

Emmet County

Residential Pian, 1nclud1ng any mod1f1cat1ons and

amendments that may be made from time to time

On the "County Residential P; an " map, long-range urban neighborhood areas
were comb ined to form larger community areas Each ot the community 3reas
may be further d1v1ded into one or more neighborhood units The number of
neighborhoods will ultimately be determined by the density of population w1th1n
each un it and the geographic size of the community /
1 V il1can-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc, Residential Areas , Petoskey Area Planning Com -

mission, January, 1969.

22-

I

~I

�. . .

....

-.

.

.::..

1·1
•

J

,11

,1

Ii
11

Following is a discussion of the general community areas mapped on the
"Residential Areas Plan" :
1.

rJ

Petoskey Area
Area 1
Altogether, there are nine residential areas in and near the City of Petoskey

;_J

and the Townships of Bear Creek and Resort.
These units were not delineated in expectation that they will be fully
developed within

twenty

years.

It may be appropriate to view the

neighborhoods as basic long-range residential areas
Persons who build homes and purchase lots in the neighborhoods have the
knowledge that they are in logical home areas. On a long-term basis, they can
expect to be w ithin a reasonable distance from planned elementary schools,
local recreation areas, and community water-sewer-utility services.
2.

Harbor Springs A rea
Areas 2, 3, 4, and 5
The Harbor Springs A rea Residential Plan is presented in four (4) basic
areas. 1 Area 2 can probably be divided into two neighborhood units,
centered on a large resource area for open space recreat ion . Area 3 has the
potential of being divided into four neighborhoods. The exact number will
depend on actual growth, the ratio of seasonal homes to permanent
residences, and the acreage devoted to recreation-community uses. Area 4
encompasses most of the exist ing developed lands in Harbor Springs. Area 5
is positioned along Little Traverse Bay and is predominantly a recreation
home area at this time . Development will be attracted to this area by the
scenic qualities of Little T !'"averse Bay . Some negative aspects relate to the
flight path of the Harbor Springs Airport and the rather narrow shape of the

.....:

area .
Overall, Areas 2 through 5 indicate the probable impact areas for future high
density residential development. As in the Petoskey area, the capacity

!~
i......:

population of these areas exceeds the projected growth .
1f.JeJghborhoods were interpreted from the residential areas illustrated in the Harbor
Springs Comprehensive Plan .
-23-

i:

�f

I

I

'
'I.
. J

3.

~

Round Lake Area

. ,

Areas 6, 7, and

9

The Round Lake Area of Emmet County Is a sort of development crossroads
where the urban izing influence of Petoskey, Harbor Springs and A ianson

tome together. Round Lake also generates development influences by virtue
of water oriented recreation, home sites, the Petoskey State Park, the Harbor
Sp rings Airport, Conway and Highway interchanges.
Planning and arranging land uses in the Round Lake area is complicated by
the narrow highway corridors (U .S -31

and M-131) created by

Lake

, ,I

I
I

Michigan, Round Lake and Crooked Lake . Added to this is a general mi x of
existing land uses, an incidence of poorly drained soils, and absence of urban
utility services. Al so, the potential routing of a north-south freeway through
th is area wi II resu It In accelerated demands for land
4.

I

Crooked Lake Area

;_-)

Areas 8, 10 and 11
Crooked Lake is an estab lished tourist housing area The most concentrated
recreation home areas are found along the north shore In and near Oden
Pickerel Lake to the east Is also developing with seasonal homes.

I
I

The entire C:--ooked-Pickerel Lake area Is limited for development by poorly
drained soils. The problem is particularly acute along the shorel ine where the
demand for lake front home sites is greatest As a result , quant ities of sewage
effluent on the surface of the ground and in the lake have reached a poi nt of
serious pollution hazard . This is an area wh 1ch clearly demonstrates planning
deficiencies in terms of :
Carrying capacity of soils and land resources
Substandard and outmoded development standards
Inadequate traffic routes to serve local and regional traffic
Disregard for land use relat1onsh1ps (mixed uses).
Fai lure to implement central utility services prior to IntensIve use of land
The above points underscore some major problems affecting the
Oden-C:ooked Lake area, and it will likely result in expensive community
improvements to correct past mistakes
-24-

•I
,..

�5.

Alanson Area
Area 12
Retail services, the Crooked River, and a new school will attract additional
development in and near Alanson .
The Valley of the Crooked River in Alanson is characterized with soil and
drainage conditions similar to areas near Crooked Lake . Poor drainage and
swamp conditions establish unstable building cond itions that will become
more acute unless community sewer and water systems are installed . Utility
studies are currently in progress.

I:J!

6.

Pellston Area
Areas 13 and 14

l -1

Pellston is important because it is adjacent to the Emmet County Airport;

. ·•

hence, a potential source of added economic development for the County as

17
1-,

well as a major transportation terminal in the northern lower peninsula . One
manufacturing plant has located adjacent to the airport, and others may in

; I

the future.
A problem in accommodating residential growth is relating to existing
community service facilities, while avoiding the flight paths of major
runways. There 1s also a land squeeze in Pellston, because the existing Village
is surrounded by public lands, poor soil areas, a major highway, and airport

_J

1-, -1
.

'----'

approach zones. It is difficult to cluster new housing around the new

l ·-1

elementary school because of the factors Iisted above .

l

'I.. !

I-.~

7.

Mackinaw City Arna
Area 15
Mackinaw City supports a relatively low year-around population because of
the seasonal nature of the econom y .
The demand tor residential land in Mackinaw City will be determined by
success in developing industrial land, especially those activities that require
access to Great Lakes shipping lanes. Also , the extent of tourist services will
bear on added employment to sustain a larger year-around population .

-25-

�1
8.

Cross Village Area
Areas 16 and 17
Cross V i llage Is located

in

a highly scen ic area with a commanding panoramic

view over Lake Mich igan . Cross Village is also an historic Indian M1ss1on site.
Significant year-around employment opportun ities in Cross Village may be
difficult to real ize . Highway access is l1m1ted, there are no railroads, and
existing community services are oriented to rural and tourist markets.

1,

Add itional seasonal home deveiopment is the most likely economic impact
that can add to the commun ity . C:-oss V i llage has excellent Lake Michigan
orientation and it lies between the attract ion forces of Wilderness $ ;ate Park
and the ski resort areas to the south

.1

Since pleasure boating on Lake

M ichigan Is a h ighly attractive tourist activity, riarbor, beach and lake front
park developments at C:·oss Village could enhance community development
potentials

9

1
-I
~

~,
·-

Other Residential A reas
Even though tt-ie Res1den11aI Plan outlines a w ide number of potent ial
res1dent1al areas that can be planned and serviced to house concentrated
patterns of development, a large proportion of new homes (!:&gt;easonal and
non-seasonal) w i ll locate on tracts of land throughout tarm and nonfarm
areas . Although this scattering development shouid not be promoted as a
planning principle, it can be less of a problem with careful attention to
ground water resources, soi Is, and overcrowding
The problems of overcrowding and the mixed use character of developments
on C:-ooked L3ke and Paradise Lake must be avoided on the other inland
water resources of the County

1, develope rs anticipate high density

subdivision act Iv1ty, then immediate concent must be given for community
water supplies and sewage treatment services

RECOMMENDATIONS
Encourage the establishment of a County Housing Commission to . det;;iil the
housing needs of Emmet County, coord,nate research and ;mpIementat1on
programs with the ex Ist1ng Housing Commissions, and cooperate with the
housing needs of l r,d 1an tam ,hes Some low-,ncome housing assistance may
be necessary In several non -City locations and trie need may be either for
repairs or new un its .

-26-

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

�17
- .J

I

'..I

Promote minimum County-wide Zoning Regulations as a means to protect
the environment of permanent and seasonal housing areas.
Guide new housing developments in accordance with the principles of the
Comprehensive Pan . Th is will avoid the postponed costs associated with
unplanned growth so that services can be economically provided . Planned
residential areas will be a more convenient place for families and will offer a
safer environment .
As feasible, tie new housing developments to central water and/or sewage
treatment facili ties to avoid resource pollution and a more efficient use of
land.

l~i

1...:

l
'

I·:

1.-,.
. ,
~_,

I.'
;I ·,

• &gt;

. '
\': ~

.

'

_,

1

~1

:

~

._;

I ~~

I
I:

-27-

�I
'

~

I" l
~

I
__J

SCHOOLS

Emmet County has five K-12 Sc:hool Districts to serve its population and some
adjacent areas in adjoinint townships. In addition, there is one K-6 School District
to serve Cross Village Township . Four (4) of the K-12 Districts are in the
Charlevoix-Emmet Intermediate School District . The Mackinaw City Schoo ls
serve portions of Wa\t\tltam Township, but these schools are officially in the
Cheboygan Intermediate District.
ENROLLMENTS
School enrollment data for Emmet County is not completely comparable in an
historical context because of changes in some district boundaries. A lso, some
school enrollment is drawn from beyond the immediate areas of Emmet County .
However, there are some significant trends that can be observed for overall
planning purposes.
1.

The K-12 pub I ic school enrollment in the Petoskey District increased by 587
between 1960-1961 and 1968-1969. This is an annual rate increase of 73 4
K-12 pupils. At this rate, the Petoskey district will be serving nearly 3,900

I(
I·;

iJ
L.J

pupils by 1990.
2.

annual increment of 12.9 pupils, for a total proJected 1990 pupi I load of
1,040.
3.

It
~

-.J

t,

--"

The Littlefield School District has experienced gradual K-12 enrollment
increases between 1960-1961 and 1968-1969, at the rate of 12.1 pupils per
year. By 1990, the total K-12 enrollment would be 650 pupils (at the 12 1
rate) or 266 above the 384 enrolled in 1968-1969.

l

1~
-;

Kindergarten through high school enrollments in the Harbor Springs District
increased from 655 1n 1960-1961 to 758 in 1968-1969. This represents an

4.

The Pellston Schools have been affected sorrewhat by annexation The K-12
enrollment in 1968-1969 was some seventeen pupils fewer (630) than 647
pupils enrolled in the 1960-1961 school year. However, the present K-12
enrollment stands at 700 . It is significant that enrollment has increased
gradually since 1966-1967, and this trend rray continue The 1960-1969 rate
of growth averaged 5.9 K-12 pupils per year.

-28-

�5.

The total school enrollment In Mack inaw City was 292 in the 1960-1961
school year . The current enrollment stands at 277 , resulting 1n a pupi l loss
rate of 1.7 per year . For planning purposes, the 1990 enrollment Is assumed
to be 300 pupils In the past two school years, enrollments increased .

6.

Cross Village 1s a small K-6 School D1str1ct which had a total enrollment of

I

24 in 1960-1961 . The current enrollment Is 23, representing a highly stable
pupil enrollment. For planning purposes, the 1990 enrollment Is assumed to
be 24 . Based on the 1970 population census, th ,s estimate may well be
conservative.
In 1962, a C1t1zen School Study was conducted In Emmet County under the
d1rect1on of Michigan State University, College of Education 1 This report

I
I

compiled school enrollment and school census data for County schools, evaluated
building needs, projected enrollrrents and recomnended various reorganizational
actions. I nclud1ng projections, the report encompassed the years 1960 through
1967-1968. Since that time, school services In the County have changed
dramatically, particularly In terms of new buildings
The map, "School Facil1t1es'' illustrates the K-12 School District boundaries In
Emmet County, 1n addition to other pertinent school service data Petoskey,
Pellston and Mackinaw City D1str 1 cts serve rural areas beyond the area of Emmet
County . A !so illustrated are schoo l bu tidings that serve each of the districts Most
of the operating schools are 1n good to excellent physical condition, and are good
educational facil1t•es
TABLES 8 and 9 summarize pertinent informat ion on eacn school building
serving at least some portion of Emmet County Tne most s1gn1f1cant overall
conclus,on is that the urban area schools have enrollments which range from near
capacity to over capacity enrollments Petoskey appears to have the most pressing
need for new and/or expanded school fact11t Ies, part,cularly In the elementary
grades Not only is t he enrollment IncreasIng at an equivalent rate of three
classrooms per year (73 pup ils), but facilities are now In ma xi mum use 2
A t present , the elementary school has design space for less than twenty add •tional
pupils; hence, it 1s near capacity W•th an established growth rate of seven K-6
pupils per year, the school will exceed its effective capacity •n the near future .
The h1gh school has a greater surplus capac,ty and may not reach design capacity
for five to ten years.
1

Emmet Coun1 y Education Citi zens Committee, Ci r .zens Schoo l Stud y, Michigan
State Un 1ve rsIty, June, 1962

2The enrollment impact does not produce an ImmedIa te demand for 3 classrooms,
because the increases are spread over a twelve grade educational sy stem w ith many
ex 1st Ing classrooms to absorb the en ro !I ment
-29-

I

I
I

I

�,~:
I

'\

TABLE 8

;

~

PUBLIC SCHOOL CAPACITIES
EMMET COUNTY

~1

1,
IJ

Enrollmmt

Design
Capacity

Surplus
Capacity

Enrollment
Overload

•-1

I,]
17

Petoskey Area ( 1969)
Ottawa, K-6
Sheridan, K-6
Lincoln, K-6
Central, K-6
Resort, K-5
Jr.Sr. High School,7-12

26
24
17
30

286
224
217
355
125
1,004

260
200
200
325
125
1,225

221

396
362

415
400

19
38

384

425

41

'·.

L.
1.i
L..J

l :1

Harbor Springs ( 1968)
Elementary, K-6
High School, 7-17
Littlefield ( 1968)
K-12 School

', . j

Cross Village ( 1970)

t:
1:·_ ;,

j ·i
d

j-i...

i~l
t~

K-6 School

22

Elementary, K-6
High School, 7-12

156
121

180
130

24
9

350
350

360
450

10
100

4,352

4,735

480

Pellston Schools ( 1970)
Elementary, K-6
High School, 7-12
Total

t..J

...

i· :
i: .
_,

18

Mackinaw City ( 1970)

~

I~
''

40est .

-30-

97

�TABLE 9

il

SCHOOL BUILDING DATA
EMMET COUNTY
Year
Constructed

Site Remarks

Enrollments

Conditions

1964
1958
1951
1929-58
1960

Adeauate
Aoeauate
Lim ited
l f!adeauate
Adeauate
L imote0

O - er Ci!Pacity
O. er Capacity
Over Capacity
Ooer CaPacoty
A : C0Pac1ty
A ; C=Pacity

Good
G::&gt;oO
Good
Fair to Gcod
Good
Gc od

1955-59-68
1915-68

Aoeauate
Lim •ted

Near C3pacity
N 2ar Caoac •tv

Good
Gc oa

K-12 Sch oo l

1957-66

Adequate

Under CaPac •ty Good

Elementary
High School

1969
1932-39

Adequate
M,n,murn

Near Caoacitv
Goo0
u~oe• Capacity Fa, r

1900

Adeauate

Ur ae r C3oacity Fa or to Pc or

Recent

Min,mum
Adeauate

U"der C~Pac 11y F3 ,, to G-:.o0
u ,_oer Caoac •ty G?od

Petoskey
Ottavva
Sheridan
Lincoln
Central
Resort
High Sc hool
Harbor Spr ings
H .S. Elementary
H .S. Higli Sc:l, ool

l
J
J

Li t tlef ield

Cross V illage

K-6 Elementary
M3ck inaw City

K-6 Elementary
H,gn Scli ool

The Littlefield K-12 School is currentl y operating with an enrollment below it s
design capacity . However, at the current rate of growth, capacity will be reached

I
I
I

I

in four to five years, earlier if growth rates increase
Past growth in the Pellston District has tended downward, but in recent years has
increased slight ly Enro llments are well above the 1960 level , having increased at
the rate of 5.9 pupils per year. There is now substantial capacity at the high
school
In 1960-61, there were 24 pupils attending classes in the C•oss Village School .
Currently ( 1969-1970), there are 23 pupils enrol led, one of wh ich attends classes

I
I
I

in Harbor Springs . No added schoo l capacity is needed in the foreseeable future .

-31-

I

�11
I

Ill
l.

~

11
•...J

The Mackinaw City School District had a total 1969-1970 enrollment of 277
pupils, down from the 292 in 1960. Both of the District's schools have some
capacity to absorb enrollment i ncreases. The high school could go over its design
capacity with slight growth .

THEORETICAL NEEDS
Theoretical school needs were determined by appl yi ng the desirable school
attendance levels to the existing and projected public school enrollment .1 The
conclusions are considered theoretical in Emmet County because the standards do
not

reflect

limitations imposed

by

travel

distance,

existing school plant

investment, School District boundaries or the desires of indiv idual citizens .
TABLE10
THEORETICAL SCHOOL BUILDING NEEDS
EMMET COUNTY

~j
K-6 Elementary

1~1
t1

7-8-9 Junior
High School

10-11-12Seni or
H igh School

I-:

1990
Theoretical
Building Need

Number of
Existing
Schools

3 .370

5to9
schools

10

1 ,685

1 to 2
scriools

5

1,685

1 to 2
scnools

5

6 ,740

7 to 13
schools

20
Curriculum
(14 by count)

1969-1970
Enrollment

1970 Theoretical
Building Need

1990
P1·ojection

2,343

3 t o6
scnools

1.063

1 to 2
schoo ls

1,016
school

Tota!

4,422

5 to 8
schools

NOTE:
The future closure of an y ex isting private schools w i ll
largely impact the communities in the P,;,toskey Area
and Harbor Springs. However, it may be Possib le for
the Public School D istr ict s to purchase , lease, or
otherwise util ize the privat e scnool builo ings.

According to TABLE 10, Emmet County has 14 school buildings and th is exceeds
the theoretical 1990 maximum need by one This is also si x buildings beyond the
existing theoretical need . Viewing these comparisons, it appears that the County
l.d

will not require addit ional structures if onl y enrollment factors are taken into
account.
1Refer to th e Preliminary School Plan report di scussi ng Schoo l Design Standards .

-32-

�I
SCHOOL PLANS
Plans for public schools in Emmet County have been prepared by three local
planning groups. The first Comprehensive Study of County School Services was
prepared under the direction of Michigan State University, College of Education
( 1962) . During 1968-1969, a school plan was prepared for the Petoskey A rea, as a
part of the Neighborhood Unit Plan .1 Public schools were analyzed for Harbor
Springs during 1969, as a part of the Comprehensive Plan.2
The purpose of the County School Plan is to review area-wide school needs on a
long-term future basis. Existing plans and recommendations are included as
applicable .
TABLE 11 summarizes the enrollment projections for 1990, with comparative
data for 1960 and current enrollments.
There are several options or alternatives to school services in Emmet County .
Hence, depending on the structure of school districts, there will be different
school plans implemented .
Even under a single County School System , it would not be advisable to plan for
only one Central County Senior High School because of population growth ,
driving distances, and winter climate .

J
J
J

I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
1Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc., Residential Areas, Petoskey Planning Area January, 1969.
2williams and Works, Engineers, Harbor Springs Comprehensive Plan, Report No
1g59 _

-33-

I

•

�I
TABLE 11
PROJECTED K-12 PUBLIC SCHOOL DEMANDS
EMMET COUNTY
Projected
1960

1968-69

1969-70

1990

Enrollment

Enrollment

Enrollment

Enrollment

Petoskey
Harbor Springs
Littlefield
Pellston
Mackinaw City
Cross Village

1,694
655
285
647
292
24

2,281
758
384
(630)

Total

3,597

School Districts

4,423

700
277
23

3,900
1,040
650
824
300
24
6,738

SOURCES: County School Reports, School District Superintendents, and the
Petoskey Area Plan.
High school pupils in Mackinaw City could be transported to St . Ignace or
Cheboygan, but probably not Petoskey because of distance.
Elementary schools should be located to serve "rural areas" in existing centers of
population . The new schools in Alanson, Pellston, and 1\/sckinaw City would be
retained to meet out-County K-6 needs. An elementary in Cross Village should be
retained .
RECOMMENDATIONS

From an overall planning point of view, an optimum school system in Emmet
County should probably function with one or two School Districts. If so, the
following school building plan should be evaluated for acceptance by citizens in
the County, and modified in detail as necessary .

i-·~~

1.

Essentially follow the school plan recommendations for the Petoskey A rea as
presented in the Petoskey A rea Comprehensive Pian .

2.

Retain a central high school and junior high school in Harbor Springs . Unless
there is substantial unanticipated population growth, one elementary school
wi 11 be able to meet demands

I:
,

1-;
.....:

-34-

�3.

There should not be more than "one additional" high school program
outside of Harbor Springs and the Petoskey A rea . 1here are now three. It
Mackinaw City elects to educate high school pupils in Emmet County, then
Pellston would be a logical high school location to serve the area of A anson,
Pellston and Mackinaw. Levering would also be a good central location for a
north County District if Alanson were part of the Petoskey or Harbor
Springs Districts.
•

4.

Assuming a high school in Pellston, A lanson could become a central
elementary school service community . Some other options would apply in
the Alanson-Pellston communities with regard to junior high and elementary
services.

5.

I

.-I

Reta in elementary grade facilities largely in their present locations The
Cross Village fac ility could require reconstruction 1n the foreseeable future .

The School Plan for Emmet County entails relatively few changes in elementary
school service areas regardless of future consolidation efforts Some final plan
decisions may depend on action at the State level with regard to further K-12
District ing. Also, the question of whether or not the Mackinaw Schools become
part of the Emmet County system

:I
·-1

I
I
I

-35-

�-1~

Jl
~

,1
ll
.

RECREATION

The purpose of the County Recreation Plan is to serve as a guide in the
maintenance, creation and perpetuation of resources, both natural and man-made,
as they relate to the recreation environment . Emphasis is placed not only upon
resident use and enjoyment, but on the attraction potential for tourists as wel I
OBJECTIVES
The future of Emmet County as a regional focal point
recreation will depend on successes

in

in

the area of outdoor

achieving the following goals:

'

•

Accurately inventory existing recreational facilities .
Familiarize County residents and potential developers with existing resources
and environmental advantages .
Guide

in

the

identification and reservation of desirable and needed

recreation sites, recognizing that many unique areas can be diverted to other
uses.
Propose design standards for preserving and developing the County's natural
resources.
Guide future development based upon a design concept to unify the
recreational elements of the County.
Insure an equitable distribution of parks, recreation areas and facilities to
serve al I areas of the County .
Encourage comprehensive outdoor
commercial and public levels.

11

recreation

planning

at

private,

Point up the need for various means of control in natural resource
development.

i,.J

The proposed County Recreation P!an is a synthesis of the inventory, adaptable

lJ4'

recreation features, and the overall concept of recreation applicable to the
County .

I;
..,,,.

u

-36-

�RECREATION RESOURCES
Emmet County's Recreation Plan is a logical planning study in which to relate the
knowledge of natural resources and environmental conditions to all forms of land

aj

use. Experience shows that it is not sufficient to plan specific recreation uses or
attractions The community must also reconcile overall policy decisions on the
use of a!I lands as they relate to the total environment of the area Decisions are
needed on matters of uses permitted on a recreation site, the degree of
development allowable in resource areas, the key areas that influence community
character, and the ,mplernentation of development controls to attain higher
environmental standards A brief description of the County's broad scale resource

I

characteristics follows :
WATER
In addition to some 71 miles of Lake Michigan frontage , Emmet County has sorre

10,400 acres of surface water. Since Lake Mich igan is important as a factor in
regional tourist drawing power, development should be designed to permit
observation. public access and retention of its highly aesthetic image Evening
sunsets over Lake Michigan are particularly scenic . Inland lakes, rivers and streams
are secondary attraction forces and the County 's accessibility to metropolitan
areas give the inland lake primary attraction forces as well

J.
.I

Whether for wildlife management purposes or for outdoor recreation activities, all
of the County's water resources must be protected from pollut ion to retain purity
and a natural environmental image.
FISH AND WILDLIFE
As a recreational activity, as a sanctuary or preserve, as a business or aesthetic
setting, fish and wildlife are integral features of the County's environment Hence,
wildlife management practices have a direct bearing on tourism recreation and the
tou nst economy
To be most effective, wildlife management must be extended to involve the vast
acreages of private recreation land Wi ldlife in the County includes : white tailed
deer, elk, fox. rabbit, grouse, woodcock, squirrel and waterfowl B1ack bear also
inhabit some areas of the County

I
I
I
I

·I

�.:. ...

.

. ' .,...

..

_

. ·- .I,.-··-·~-· .

'~
~
-I

Lo

•

~

•

• ,. ..

..

GOVERNMENT LAND
Although private forest-farm lands fulfill open space and recreation needs, they

..

are not as permanent as public owned land . Private lands may move into or out of

•• J

recreational use in terms of the economic needs of the moment . Government
lands, therefore, can be regarded as permanent features of outdoor recreation and
they are more likely to come under Comprehensive Resource Management About

j

100 square miles of land in Emmet County are State owned . This is roughly

~j

twenty percent of the County's land area.

I:

TOPOGRAPHY
Topography in Emmet County cannot be described in simple terms, since there is

1-,

wide relief contrast among the sixteen ( 16) townships. However, the predominant
steeper slopes may be found in the central portions of the County and in the

IJ
I-~

southeast . The east and north areas are generall y level, while the entire west side
has slopes ranging from gently rolling to rolling

-·j

LAND

I

_· i

11
I;
~

Being the northernmost County In the Lower Peninsula, Emmet County has a
relatively open character, interesting land forms, scenic woodlands, and many
square miles of public land . These combine to establish a "land resource" that is
coming under increasing pressures for recreation -resort development . As the
intensity and density of development increases, the open space character will
diminish . Wood lots will be cleared for building purposes, hills leveled and
acreages subdivided into smaller and smaller units It also means hunting pressure,

~;

sanitary and refuse disposal problems, and ecological imbalance conditions .

I-~

The map, "Selected Scenic and Recreation Resources", inventories specific

:....~

~

,~

1,.
~

i-~--;
I:

recreation facilities and areas with potential for recreation development Public
lands, State forests, public access sites, local parks and playgrounds are mapped .
In addition, special or unique recreation potentials are listed . These include such
features as potential impoundment sites, historic interest areas, scenic view areas,
and related features with recreation-tourism significance .
TAB LE 12 shows that there are 405 0 acres of local park and school recreation
land in Emmet County . All of this land is owned by loca l governmental units in
the County as there are no County owned parks. In addition, there are 7,273 .1

. . ...

i.:.....:

-38-

�acres of land in major regional parks (e g., Wilderness State Park), roadside parks,
public access sites and related recreation resources State lands, largely in the
Wilderness State Forest contain some 90 square miles of land Another 2,755 7
acres of recreation land is in private and semi-private ownership, plus private
cottages, ski chalets, recreation farms, and hunting acreage
TABLE 12
RECREATION LAND INVENTORY
EMMET COUNTY
Recreation Acreage by Type
Local Regional
Total

Recreation Sponsors

Townships, Villages and
Schoo l Districts
City of Petoskey
City of Harbor Springs
State of Michigan

197 5
147 4
60 1

23 5

7,249 6

221 0
147 4
60 1
7,249 6

7,2731

7,678 .1

Totals

4050

i
~

I

SOURCE · Emmet County Comprehensive Recreation Plan
LOCAL NEEDS

Statistically, there is a sizeable local park surplus •n Emmet County, both under
current population levels and foreseeable proJections through 1990 However, the
statistical needs are not equally divided among the local units of government

I
·I
'I

Hence, the conclusions drawn from TABLE 13 should be related to individual
communities, rather than column totals

I

TABLE 13 shows that the local recreation surplus is mainl y the result of large
acreages 1n Bear Creek, Bliss and Carp Lake Townships Th e Cities of Petoskey
and Harbor Springs also reflect large surplus acreages Between 1970 and 1990,

II
I

local park needs will be felt in the Townships of Cross Village, F ·iendsh1p, Maple
River, Pleasantview . Resort, Springvale and West Traverse

-39

�•-r

. -

•

, · ~ • , . - .....•:~~••••:,;••• .

-

i.

-

••

........ --,.. ....••,..u.--........

••

.:,.

~,

-···- ............. .

•,•:-""

Ji,
'

~~

TABLE13

~

LOCAL RECREATION NEEDS
EMMET COUNTY

Ii

-ll 1
;__.

L1

Existing
Acreage

Community

2.5

50 .5
2.5
5.8
1.0
1.4
3.2
7.7

-21 .5
+32 .2
+45.3
+5 .0
-0.4
-3.2
+5.2

20.2

10.4

+9 .8

6.5

8.4

-1 .9

6.3

3.4
2.0
2.5
23 .8
5.7

+2.9
-2.0
+7 .5
-13 .8
-5 .7

20 .2

4 .5
4.0

+15.7
-4.0

Subtotal

197.5

136.8

+ 71.1

1--i

17. City of Petoskey
18. City of Harbor Springs

147.4
60 .1

75 .2
17 .5

+72.2
+42.6

I _-;

Total

405.0

229.5

+185 .9

, -l

(:L-. j

1~
'

1.,--..~-;.

1-;

:I

1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

l ~'.J

11 .
12.
13.
14
15.

1-.
,_,

tJ

.

Bear Creek Township
Bliss Township
Carp Lake Township
Center Township
Cross Village Township
Friendship
Little Traverse
Littlefield Township
and Alanson
McKinley Township and
Pellston (pt.)
Maple River Township
and Pellston (pt.)
Pleasantview Twp .
Readmond Township
Resort Township
Springvale Township
WaWatam and Mackinaw
City (pt.)
West Traverse Twp .

10.0
10.0

·,

ha

I-.
.......,

ii
R7
•

16.

29.0
34 .7
51 .1
6.0
1.0

Community or Local
Recreation Acreage Needs
1990
1990 Surplus (+)
Need1
Deficit (-)

!.

1Townships with a projected population decline show a 1990 need based upon
the 1960 population . The recent 1970 Census shows some townships with larger
population increases than what was experienced up to 1960 .
RECOMMENDATIONS

l
l

Emmet County has vast resources upon which to plan a highly diversified and
coordinated recreation system . Demands can be satisfied in terms of citizens,
tourists and others who may visit the County . The apparent abundance of
recreational opportunity makes it impossible to anticipate every public or private
-40-

�recreational service that may 9ccur in the years ahead Hence, the Recreation P•an
must be amended, updated and broadened or detailed from time to t ime
Following is a summary of the major recreation proposals that relate to Emmet
County and the communities within the County (see map oeg.nn1ng this se:;"t10, ,
"Recreation Plan "

MISSIONARIES - Promote the historically important role of the Missionary in
Emmet County . Acquire historic sites, build replicas of former missions, churches,
shrines, trading posts, Indian cultural centers, and related points of interest
INOIAN CULTURE - The life, habits and history of the Indian people are high ly
interesting facets of any area's history, especiall y Emmet County The shores of
Lake Michigan and commun ities of Petoskey, Harbor Spr ings, Midd le Vill ag e,
Cross Village and Mackinaw Cit y al l have a strong history in lnd ,an culture
Historical markers, reconstructed Ind ian V illages, museums and re lated means can
be used to express Indian history to the educational-cultural advancement of
tourists and citizens Wycamp Lake has an historical site listed in the Nationa l
Register of Historical Places.

I

AGRICULTURE - Since the County has some excellent agricultura l land , w ork
toward the cont, nuance of farm Ing enterprises Farms are necessary for basi c food
product ion , they are important economic forces, they support a higher level of
wildlife for sportsmen

i

SCENIC EASEMENT - Scenic easements are a means of preserving scenic areas
without taking title in fee Easements would be most log 1cal along rivers where
the natural image is important to canoeists and/or fishermen A 1so, along scenic
roadways where panoramic views may become obscurred by development

I

I

COUNTY PAR KS - A County level interest in recreation may well lead to the
establishment of one or more County parks I· so , these shou ld be coord inated
into the recreation system so as to supplement and operate 1n harmon y w ith

I

community parks and State parks Some recreat ional opportunities may on ly be
established through County level action

I

LOCAL PAR KS - Recreation for County residents will evolve from County
features and tourist facilities However, each community w ith ;n the Coun ty w ill
have specific local recreational demands to fulfill

County , School District ,

Township and Village lands should be given pri or• ty considerat ion as reso urces for
local recreationa l fac ilities

-41 -

II

�.

•
-II
-I .
-I:

.

. . -· .-~~
- ... -,.__.

.

,

l

j

j

;

.. , J

.,·I

FUNDING - Because of the limited funds available for recreational facilities, the
County should encourage the development of recreational facilities through
private enterprise and other public agencies. Some sources include: Bureau of
Outdoor Recreation, Michigan Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Forest
Service and others
DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS - Standards of design should be developed and
incorporated into local development controls and where possible, applied on a
County-wide basis. (zoning, subdivision regulations, scenic easements) .
TOWNSHIP AND COMMUNITY RECREATION ·
There are three basic recreation objectives that should apply to all communities in
Emmet County . These are:
Develop parks, improve parks, and generally meet the recreation services of
residents in all age groups.

:1

I: ,
1~

Acquire, promote, and/or assist with the acquisition of and appropriate level
of

i

of

local

recreation

resources,

natural

features,

historical-cultural interest areas, and related .
Give priority consideration to the expansion or development of recreational
opportunities on lands already in community ownership and use (State,
County, Township, Village)

1-.

Ii

development

Some suggested locations for community park and recreation features include:

I

~

I-;

·. ~

-'

~-;

l

~ .. ?
'-'

1.

I
I

1.

Bear Creek Township
Near the Township Hall.
. On Pickerel Lake Road at a transition point with the proposed freeway ,
proposed industrial area, and/or trailer housing areas
With planned school locations, and/or · on the sites of larger community
and regional parks.
In the Bear River Valley area .
On Round Lake to preserve open space

L....

-42-

_,

·- - ..... _,· ........

:...

�Among scenic wood

lots,

forested

areas

and

rolling

hills in the

community, especially in planned neighborhood areas
. On hillsides or sites offering outstanding panoramic views such as from
US-131 south of Petoskey and from Pickerel Lake Road
2.

Biiss Township
. Encourage the State or County to expand Wilderness State Park
southward to include the sand dune areas along the Lake Michigan Beach

d
-I

I

. Provide for local recreation use (ballfields, skating, sledding, etc), perhaps
in the vicinity of the Township Hall or in 8 1iss Center

3

J

Carp Lake Township
Retain the fifty acre Lincoln Park site on Paradise Lake In public
ownership, and add recreation facilities
Protect the scenic recreation and resource potentials of Carp River . This is
a canoe water and fishing stream .
. Establish some local recreation areas in the Township, perhaps near the
Township Hall which is in a more central location

4.

Center Township
. Maintain and improve the community ballf1eld near Larks Lake Facilities
may also be developed at the Youth Center and/or the Township Hall.
. Local and community recreation services may be provided at the
Township gravel pit, as a reuse of community resources

5

Cross Village Township

.I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Either at the school or on church property in the Village, recreation
apparatus, ice skating rinks and related active play facilities can be provided
to meet local demands
. Develop a marina and/or harbor facility on Lake Michigan A marina
would be an excellent complementary facilit y to the scenic beach

-43-

1

�. The sandy beach area in and near the Cross Village harbor area should be
used for recreation purposes, emphasizing open space characteristics.
6.

Friendship Township
. Work to acquire frontage on Lake Michigan for Township park-recreation
purposes.
. General public recreation sites may be developed at the Township Hall
location, near Stutsmanville, or in the vicinity of the Five Mile Creek
Community Center
Develop recreation uses on the 80 acres of land one mile south of the
Township Hall.

~

7.

11/

Little Traverse Township
Expand equipment and land near existing parks, and/or consider the
development of a new community park for active play .

. '

. !

I

Attempt to acquire recreation land or access easements to Little Traverse
Bay .
. A scenic community park may be developed in and near State owned
lands in the center of Section 11 off the Chadderdon Road.
. Other recreation potential sites may be developed in conjunction with the
Township Hall or some similar community areas of importance.
8.

Littlefield Township and Alanson
Continued improvements and expansions
park-playground facilities in Alanson and Oden .

at

the

small

loca l

. New recreation facil ities may be expanded on one or both of th e large
school land ownerships
9.

McKinley Township and Pellston (part)
. The Pellston High School, new Pellston Elementary School, and the
Pellston ballfield and tennis courts provide a variety of ex isting recreation
services (ballfield and tennis courts are in the Maple River Township portion
of Pellston Village) .

'._.
l

-44-

�. Van and Levering have no public recreation areas; however, small parks
for casual recreation may be needed
. A potential water impoundment exists on Van Creek and may be a good

rl

source for establishing a general community recreation area
10. Maple River Township and Brutus
. The Township Hall at Brutus is in a good central location for community
recreation facilities .
.

Local recreation may also be provided on Maple River Road and/or

Woodland Road.
. School

District and County forest lands along the Maple River are

resources for recreation
11 . Pleasantview Township
.

::-... .:

Local recreation areas may be provided at the Township Hall location; this

being a central geographic location.
The Harbor Springs School District own 160 acres of potential recreation
land west of Boyne Highlands
12.

Readmond Township
Improve, expand and/or add facilities to the lake front Township park .
Provide active type recreational uses at off-the-lake sites, as near the
Township Hall
Encourage

the

maintenance

restoration

and

accessibility

of

cultural-historical features related to Indian populations and early missionary
activities
13.

Resort Township
. An active sports recreation area may be located at the Resort School
and/or with the fire station

-45-

·I
·I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

�11
'

I·
t

11
Ir
11
11
11
I

,,
.I

I
I

. Long-range nei ghborhood recreation areas shou ld be developed in terms of
the recommendations of the Petoskey Area Plan . Some scenic natural
features in the neighborhoods are indicated as future public open space.
. Seek to acquire park-recreation areas in one or more of the following
locations.
On Little Traverse Bay, at the north end of Townline Road .
On Walloon Lake, perhaps in the vicinity of the Manthei Veneer Mill.
On the north end of Wal loon Lake at the south extremity of Cemetery
Road .
Enlargement of the public access site on Walloon Lake at Resort-Pike
Road .
Other scenic Township areas with a potential for diversified outdoor
recreation, preferably to serve all seasons of the year.
14. Springvale Township
. Local park and recreation areas may be developed near Epsilon for a good
central location . A facility on Ellsworth Road or east Pickerel Lake Road
would also be near populated areas.
. Reserve some rolling topographic areas for local recreation sledding, skiing, etc.

hiking,

15. WaWatam Township and Mackinaw Village
. Local recreational facilities in Mackinaw Village may be increased if the
rate of population growth increases. Community recreation areas should
then be provided in accessible locations for homes.
. Community recreation may also be developed on the State owned lands

I
I

I

and school forests. The Township owns 125 acres of land north of French
Lake that has recreation use potential .

-46-

�l
l
1
I
1
I
J
''·

MEDICAL FACILITIES
Emmet County is well endowed with medical services and facilities . The most
significant facilities include:

General
Facility

Location

Capacity

Petoskey

177 beds

Petoskey

70 beds

Harbor Springs

80 beds

Petoskey

80 beds

Little T raverse Hospital and
Associated Burns Ciinic
Lockwood Gene ral Hospita l
County Medical Care Unit
Beverl y Manor (nursing home)

407 beds

Total

In addition to the foregoing, plans are being readied for the construction of an
eighty bed convalescent home in Petoskey to care for ambulatory patients those not requiring acute care medical services A 1I of the maJor hospital service
facilities are in the urbanizing areas of the County Families who live in the
northern areas of Emmet County have a cho ice of coming into Petoskey for
medical service or going to St . Ignace or Cheboygan
The L itt le T•averse Hospital in combinat ion with the Burns C inic, establishes a
focal point of medical services. This is the largest hospital 1n the County and
draws patients from an area which extends from Bella ire to Newberry in the
Upper Pen insula P1ans for expanding this hospital inc lude a proposed six -story
w ing behind the existing structure Capacity wi ll increase from the present 177
beds to an estimated 325 beds in ten or fifteen years
Services at the County hospital are influenced by two characteristics of the area
Tourists have a significant impact as demonstrated by the high month usage in
July and August Moreover, 600 to 700 persons are treated at L 1ttle T -averse for
skiing injuries each year . The County also has a higher than average senior citizen
population

Th is 1s evidenced by existing and planned facilities classified as

nursing homes or convalescent homes I! retirement village developments increase
in Em met County, additional medical care type services will have to be provided
The trend toward higher proportions of elderl y c1t1zens will likel y continue

-51-

I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

�I
1.i
\ l

~
I

ROAD COMMISSION
A critical service provided 1n every County is the planning, maintenance and
construction of County roads primarily in township communities. In Emmet
County, the road maintenance problem is multiplied during winter months.
Annual snow fall levels, plus the influx of winter sports enthusiasts demand that

I

'"'

traffic move over the County road system under al I weather conditions. Added to
this is the continual expansion of the County road system for seasonal or vacati )n

I·j

:._J

home developments. Permanent home owners in townships must also commute to

Ii.J
.

work in nearby cities and villages .

'

Emmet

I,

Administrative offices and the main vehicle service garages are located in the City

County's

Road

Commission

operates

from

two

basic

facilities.

of Petoskey . Some garage and storage faci Iities are also located in Levering to
provide ready access to the northern portions of the County . Emmet County is

It
Ii
If
J

responsible for maintaining some northern portions of Interstate 75 in adjacent
Cheboygan County .
Because Petoskey is in the southern area of the County, the administrative offices

I
.; ·'!

•

and main vehicle garages are not centrally located . Hence, it would be desirable
I

and more efficient to operate one large County Road Commission service
complex at a more central location According to the County Road Engineer,
such a complex may require from forty to eighty acres of land sufficient to
consolidate all major services.

I

I

The Levering garage would probably be retained for at least winter months use in
order to serve I-75 .

1·u1

A central location for County garages involves some balance between a geographic

--

I .!
I·
~

center, and the center of County road mileage. The approximate geographic
center is one mile south of Robinson Road and one mile east of Pleasant View
Road in Pleasantview Township . This exact location is inaccessible by road and is
among swamp lands Also, this site may be too far north in view of the County
Road mileage in the southern townships

I

~

Ji
I,
.
I.

It becomes apparent that the most suitable location would be within an area
defined as being ·

'

.
;_,

.__,

l-:

;__!

East of Harbor Springs .
At or south of the Pleasantview Township Hal l .

-52-

�..

,

·.

-l

-l
West of the Fish Hatchery .
North of Round Lake

LIBRARIES
In Emmet County, there are four (4) public libraries, not counting libraries or
reading rooms in the local schools A lso, there is a small library in Mackinaw City
(Cheboygan County) to serve northern County areas The four Emmet libraries
are located as follows :
1.
2

City of Petoskey
City of Harbor Springs

3.
4

Village of A lanson
Village of Pellston

These four libraries provide reasonably good geographic coverage in the County if
their services are generally available to non-residents (either by fee or other
agreements) . Rural and township library services may be provided by a "book
mobile" system . Aiso, there have been some successful experirrents with mail
order library services in other rural counties
Small libraries and/or reading room facilities may be provided with township
halls, community buildings, and in a local school The Pellston and A anson
libraries are quite small compared with the larger services in Harbor Springs and
Petoskey .
An urban area standard used as a guide to library needs, states that one ( 1) li brary
is needed for each 15,000 to 25,000 persons in the community This is for a full
and complete library and suggests that no new libraries will be needed in Emmet
County prior to 1990, if existing libraries serve rural areas . A County-wide library
system can ensure the ava ilability of complete services to all County citizens, as
well as coordinate the resources of existing libraries

NORTH CENTRAL MICHIGAN COLLEGE
North Central Michigan College is sited LlPOn 255 acres of land io the
south-central section of the City of Petoskey The present enrollment is near 700
students and functions as a two-year community college

-53-

-I

I
.I
-I
I
I
-I
I

I

II
II
II
III
~

�. . . .... ..

1-:

-i
l

'11
lljtJ
l ;1

u

1{·1

u

l -:1

. '

In recent years, the college has been drawing about fifty percent of its student
body from Emmet County and another forty percent from surrounding counties.
The remaining ten to twelve percent came from beyond this area of the State
However, this out-area percentage has risen to about twenty percent in recent
years. This increase is partly attributable to the provision of dormitory space
The college projects its enrollment to approximately 1,000 or 1,200 students by

1980, with no need for additional land This projection has been based on the
growth trends generally reflected in the area, since it is a community college
service .
In view of the planned population holding capacity of Petoskey and its
surrounding neighborhoods, enrollment demands could lead to a sizeable increase
in the enrollment of the college, possibly bringing about a change to a four-year
institution. A four-year college would attract large numbers of non-local students.

1.

.-j

I

The skiing, swimming, and outdoor resources of the County should prove highly
attractive to prospective students. Given the curriculum, it is not unreasonable to
think of a "University" with a strong resort atmosphere . It this evolved, the area
could look to a college-university facility with land requirements of one square

&lt;

.,/

- I

mile or more and enrollments ranging from 5,000 to 10,000 An expanded site is
mapped on the "Future Land Use Pian"

AIRPORTS

1-.

I ;-l..
I·~ ~
1,-:
;__,

Emmet County has three public airports· the County Airport at Pellston, the
Harbor Springs Airport east of Harbor Springs, and the Mackinaw City Airport
north of Carp Lake

1.

Pellston
The County Airport at Pellston is the only scheduled commercial air service

,-,:

facility 1n the County, and it serves a five-county area Existing terminal

.

the larger fan jet aircraft and increasing numbers of people who use air travel

:
..;_j

facilities are inadequate to serve the increased passenger traffic generated by
service . Runway extensions are underway to accommodate 100 passenger
jets, and a new east-west runway may be necessary in the next twenty years.
A conservative projection of traffic shows a 1,000 daily passenger load by

1973

Ii

I

This

is

a volume

comparable

-54-

L..,

to existing

loads at the

Bay

�-I
City-Midland-Saginaw Airport, _
some 160 miles to the south. A new
terminal building is now under construction and will have a large lobby and
lounge with seating for 140 persons Restaurant services and parking lot
expansions are also planned .
·.

The Pellston Airport will likely remain and expand as the area's major air
traffic facility . IT Is important, therefore, that residential, industrial and
recreation developments recognize the impact of jet aircraft and runway
approach zones when locating in the area

)

I
I
.. '
.·
\

2

Harbor Springs
The role of charter type airports is rapidly expanding throughout the nation
The Harbor Springs airport is conveniently located near Little Traverse Bay,
major ski resorts, and concentrated areas of recreation homes This produces
a year-around market for private air service between Emmet County and

·I

major metropolitan centers .
As private executive-recreation air traffic continues to expand at the Harbor
Springs Airport, there may be increasing conflicts and hazards created with
surrounding lands

The combination of features that make the airport

attractive to air traffic, also affects land development. Hence, industries,
homes and seasonal-resort dwellings are attracted to the Bay area and are
clustering within a short distance of the airport AdJacent lands in glide path
areas should be kept free of development or developed with very low density
uses

3

Mackinaw City
The Village of Mackinaw City owns some 320 acres of land north of Paradise
Lake (also Carp Lake) that has been used for private-recreation air traffic
Having sod runways and no improvements, this landing field receives very
minimum use . The future of the airfield 's development Is not optimistic and
casual private use may be the extent of future demand

WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES
A complete review of water and sewer services in Emmet County is contained in a
companion report, "Comprehensive Water and Sewer P,an", April, 1971, funded
with a Farmers Home Administration planning grant 1 A "-Ummary of the plan's
findings Is included herein

1Engineering aspects of the Comprehensive Water and Sewer Plan were provided by
McNamee, Porter and Seeley, Consulting Engineers, Ann Arbor, Michigan

-55-

·I
I

I
I
I

�I

1

SANITARY SEWAGE
A number of waste water treatment facilities are being planned in Emmet County .
They include :

-I-

1.

The City of Petoskey recent awarded contracts for the construction of a new
2.5 million gallons per day waste water treat ment plant wh ich Is to be

:.J

located in Magnus Park In the City . The existing treatment plant wil l be
abandoned and the waste water pumped to the new plant by means of a
pumping station to be constructed near the ex ist ing site

I

\
:.: .j
'-

2.

Bear Creek Town sh 1p has obtained the serv ices of Wi 111ams and Works.
Consulting Engineers, to study waste water co llection and treatment In the
Township

3.

The City of Harbor Springs and Little Traverse Township have joined
together in the format ion of a waste water treatment author it y The
authority has recentl y received bids on a new treatment facil 1ty T·eatment
will be an aerated lagoon type followed by disinfection and spray irrigation
The location of the 320 acre treatment site is shown on the "Future Land
Use Plan" map .

1·

I
Idi

4.

Harbor Point and Wequetons1ng have contracted with the City of Harbor
Springs for waste water greatment

5.

Waste water from the Conway area w•II be treated at the Harbor Springs Little Traverse Authority' s facil :ty

6.

1·. ;

Because of problems around Crooked Lake and along the Crooked River, the
Village of Alanson and Littlefield Townsh 1p have jointly obtained the
services of Williams and Works tor the purpose of making a study for waste
water collect ion and treatment Work on this stud y w as begun recent ly and
no recommenda1Ions have been presented to date The feasibility of Aanson
and Littlefield Township 10In,ng the Harbor Spr ings- Little T ··averse
Authority is be ing evaluated.

,/

. ·,

ILi

7.

The firm of Johnson &amp; Anderson , Consulting Engineers for Mackinaw Cit y,
is preparing plans and spec :f1cat1ons for a new waste water treatment facility

I-:

Current plans are to abandon the existing treatment plant and pump th e
waste water to a new t reatment facility to be located on a six ty -ac re si te
southwest o f th e Cit y (re fer t o " Future Land Use P;an" map)

-56
LJ

�I'

8

Aithough the Village of Pellston is not planning sewer improvements at the
present time, it is recommended that they be considered in the near future,
should financial assistance be available.

DOMESTIC WATER SUPPLIES

I
-1

Safe and abundant drinking water is a most fundamental requirement to our
existence

There are two sources available for obtaining this water. These are

surface water sources such as lakes and rivers, and ground water sources such as
artesian and drilled wells.
1.

Petoskey 's water is supplied by an infiltration well, 17 feet deep, and a

:I

pumping station located on the shore of Little T·averse Bay within the City .
The water 1s chlorinated and fluoridated prior to entering the distribution
system I t is believed that the infiltration well is recharged from ground
wate.- flowing from the south , rather than from Little T•averse Bay, as the
normal water level 1s above that in the Bay The Petoskey water supply is of

I

a good quality and not so hard as to warrant a softening plant at the present
time

2

I
I

The Harbor Springs water system Is supplied by four wells and one 335,000
gallon ground storage reservoir In a 1966 revision of the City's Master Pian
by Williams and Works, it was recommended that three additional wells be
installed

3

One e1ght-1nch well approximately 200 feet deep and one ten-inch well 296
feet deep supply water to the Mackinaw City system It is estimated by the
City that these wells have over double the capacity of that being utilized at
the present time Storage is provided by one 100,000 gallon elevated tank

·I
;

4.

Boyne Highlands operates a private water system which is supplied by one
six-inch well, one eight-inch well and one ten-inch well Storage is provided
by a 2,000 gallon reservoir and the water is reported to be of a very good
quality

5

There 1s an existing water system in Hidden Hamlet, a development of
recreational homes located at the Nubs Nob ski area The system is privately
owned and operated by the Hidden Hamlet property owners. The system is
supplied by four 4-inch wells and one 6-inch well . There are no fire hydrants

.57.

I
.

�.,

. -- ....-· . . --·

-

I
Ii~
1

d

11

6.

.1

Ii·--·

11
11
'--J

~ ~

11

L'Arbre Croche on Little Traverse Bay between Petoskey and Harbor Springs
is constructiong a private water system which is to be supplied by two 350
feet deep wells The new system will be hydro-pneumatic.

7.

Although the Village of Pellston does not have a public water supply, the
Village maintains three (3) wells for fire protection

8.

Wequetonsing and Harbor Point have water systems supplied by the City of
Harbor Springs Bay View also has a water system and 1s included in the
Petoskey service area The remaining area of the County is served by private
wells.

It is recommended that the existing water distribution systems in Petoskey,
Harbor Springs and Mackinaw City be extended as required in the future to serve

1·~1

the areas approximating those to be served by their waste water treatment
facilities . Problems will be encountered in expanding the present systems because
of the varying terrain of the County Booster pumping stations and reservoirs will

1·1

be required to maintain adequate pressures 1n the areas of higher elevation

_:/

l·i/

Because of potential problems within the Village of Pellston, caused by the small
lot sizes, it is recommended that thought be given to a pub I ic water supply for the

__ .}

I:
I:
iLd:
I:
_j

I·:
. '!

~

IlJ~,

Vi I lage . Considering relative costs, it is recommended that a water system be given
priority over waste water col lect1on and treatment P:·1vate developments sou th of
Pellston may encourage some joint utility service connections with the Village
A public water system should also be considered in A:anson However, a waste
water collection system may be given priority at the present time
It would be desirable to have all dwellings in the County provided with waste
water collection and treatment and/or pub I ic water sui:;pl ies. However, this may
not be economically feasible even with substantial outside financial aid

I I is

recommended that the non-urbanizing areas of the County continue with private
septic tanks, drain fields and wells for the present As further development occurs
or as potential problems arise, additional sewer and/or water systems should be
studied .

..

Some rural areas that may require new or expanded services because of increasing

I~

Shores, Cross Village and the ski resort areas 1n Pleasantview Township Demands

development include : Walloon

Lake , Paradise Lake, La rks Lake, Mackinaw

in the rural townships of West T : averse, Friendship, Readmond, c,oss V illage,

i,. _.

I·;

.......,

-i

-58-

�..

.:•

-·

'

B11ss, and WaWatam would probably arise

in

areas near the Lake Michigan shore.

The other townships may remain more rural, and serivces may never be feasible
except in a few instances where concentrated development occurs. Levering, Carp
Lake, Brutus, and Van may be affected under these conditions Springvale
Township could have some potential utility service area near Crooked Lake and
Pickerel Lake

...

'
;

In general, there 1s an abundance of potable ground water in Emmet County .

LAND FILLS
Land fil l sites are 1nd1cated on the "Community Facilities" map . When needed,
additional land fill sites can nrobably be developed with ",elative" ease, because
of the rural and undeveloped nature of the County

However, it may prove

effective to operate land fills in areas where land reclamation could prove
beneficial

to

recreation

developments

or other extensive use adaptations.

Notw1thstand 1ng these objectives, care should be exercised to ensure that land fill
sites have m 1 n1mum nuisance affects to home areas, tourist facilities, and scenic
resources .
O her methods of solid waste disposal, such as incineration, probably would not
1

be considered unless serious pollution and nuisance hazards occur from existi ng
methods, or unless technological aevelopments render other methods more
feasible

FIRE STATIONS
In Emmet County, there are si x (6) tire stations located in Petoskey, Harbor
Springs, Pellston, Mackinaw City, Resort Township and Carp Lake Township
(refer to map, ··c ommunity Facilities") Forest fire equipment and surveillance is
provided by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources (Pellston , Mackinaw

.I

I
I
I
I
I

and Indian River ) hie community fire stations provide fire protection to some

I

461 square miles of land and all are rrenned by volunteers.
Ru ral fire protection systems rarely achieve favorable insurance ratings because of
the wide geographic area to be serviced, lack of public water system, perhaps less
sophisticated equipment, and

lack of full-time personnel

For example, a

township can qualify for a special "r-,1 ne protected" c1assification, if it furnishes

•

fire apparatus and maintains at least twelve trained volunteer firemen under the
superv 1s1on of a competent fire cr1 1ef However, only those areas within five (5)
public road miles of the fire station will be classified as protected 1
1commun 1t y fire pr otection systems are rated on a scale from 1 to 10 A one rating
is the r1 ghest poss ibl e rating , and a nine would be considered a minimum protected
classtf ,cat ion
1

-59J

�t :·:. . ~. :.

. '-

·.- .,::-

--

I
I~
•I
I

II

URBA N AREA FIRE PROTECTION

;)

~

The number of fire stations necessary to serve urban areas in southern Emmet
County may be minimized through mutual site planning If fire stations are too

I

11
.J

stations may be req u ired to complete the coverage

This could be costly to

citizens who must then finance duplicate facil ities .

-1
.:J

11

I
-

i,
Ii
I:

close together, there will be excessive overlap to protected areas and additional

TOWNSHIP FIRE PROTECTION
In Emmet County, township development is sparse and generally scattered over a
wide area. Growth projections indicate that 1t will be some years before
significant new development occurs 1n rural areas, which are heavily influenced by
recreation uses, farms, and forest land . Hence, a greater reliance on fire protection
agreements with nearby urban communities .
Existing township fire stations are located 1n Carp Lake and Resort Township .

. )

Like the City-Village stations, these are manned by volunteers and have service
I

-'

areas extending well in excess of the standards advocated by insurance
underwriters However, rural fire stations are provided more for basic protection
purposes than for lower insurance rates
FOR EST FI RE PROTECT ION

1-,
,..z:/

l~j-1

i·,
. ·1

Fo rest fire protection in Emmet County 1s primarily the responsibility of the
Michigan Department of Natural Resources However, the nature of forest fire
hazards requires extensive cooperation with private industry, local government
and the cit izens in general .
FIRE STAT ION PLAN

;,.,._,)

I·:

Considering the variables 1n rural fire protection systems, the following fire
station plan may provide optimum protection:

11

1.

The urban area fire protection system proposed 1n the Petoskey A :ea,
appears to give adequate protection to the area expected to receive most of
the County's new growth and development

2.

It development continues at a strong pace in the area between Harbor
Springs, the Ski Resorts, Oden, and the Petoskey State Park, a new station is

'-1

•r
~

'I

J

i-~
:

i
I

likely to be needed somewhere north of the Harbor Springs Airport

•_ ;

'
c..

-60·

�r,T

3.

Continued growth and development in the Alanson Area will increase service
demands on the existing fire station

It the existing fire station is ever

displaced, a new station can be located in almost any area of the Village.
However, a better location might be on the west up-land areas.
4.

The Pellston Fire S~ation affords excellent coverage to the County airport
and the built-up portions of the Village . Rural area coverage encompasses

~l

most of the immediate influence area of the Village and three-mile coverage
includes those areas proposed for future residential development on the

-I

Residential Areas Pian
5

The Carp Lake Fire Station prov ides rural area coverage. There is excellent

-1

rural protection overlap with the Pellston station and the two stations
operate on a mutual agreement basis High value coverage reaches the shores
of Parad ise Lake, and three mile protection is afforded to nearly all lakefront
development 1n Carp Lake Township Fire service agreements extend
westerly to serve C•oss Village

J

6

Mackinaw City's new fire station will be adjacent to the old station in the
extreme easterly area of the Vil Iage Despite this easterly orientation, there is
very good rural area coverage to WJWatam Township .

;I

7.

The northwest portions of Emmet County are without effective fire
protection A stat ion in C·oss Village could fill some of this void. The prime
function of a C· oss Village station would be to provide minimum rural area
coverage, and this could extent five-mile protection into Readmond
Township and portions of Center and B!iss Townships.

8.

Springvale Township has a geographic service gap . Substantial new growth
and development in the area of Pickerel Lake, East Pickerel Lake Road, and
Epsilon could generate a need for a Springvale facility

The need for fire stations in any area should ultimately be determined by the
most effective respon se capability

-61-

f•
,':,.--:

J
I
,I

I
I
I
'

· ..,. ,l

•
•·'I
I
_j

�.,..,

. . . :~; ' - .
~

~

-

t

'

'

I
t

_l

Ii'
'- 1
I.J
Ij
I
J
I

COMMERCIAL

Emmet County's major convenience trade area was determined to be coterminous
with the political boundaries of Emmet County 1 Hovvever, the regional
comparison trade area encompasses Emmet and Charlevoix Counties, most of
Cheboygan County and the northern edge of Orsego County
Within the County , however, there are three minor convenience trade areas based
upon the drawing power of Petoskey, Harbor Springs, and Cheboygan-Mackinaw
City . The three trade areas are superimposed on the map of "Existing Commercial

: 4

Land Use" in this section of the plan

I

THREE COUNTY REGION

1-.

Cheboygan Coun ty and Charlevoi x County are located adJacent to Emmet
County in the northern tip of the Lower Peninsula These counties have similar

~A
·.·l

development influences related to regional character, transportation, tourism,
natural resources, agricultural, and industry This three county region housed
some 43,900 persons In 1960 11 was estimated that the 1969 population of this
region is about 50,000 persons, a figure verified by the 1970 US Census
Since Emmet County's Prel im inary Commercia l Base Analysis was completed, the

I
I

1967 U.S. Censu s of Business was publ ished Without adjusting for inflation, the
sales data compare as follows:

Sales in $1,000
1958
1963
1967

Percent of Three
County Sales
in 1967

Emmet County
Charlevoi x
Cheboygan County

$24,930
$13,165
$19,738

$29,977
$17,385
$22 ,374

$38,109
$19,390
$28,900

44 1%
22 4%
33 5%

Total

$57,833

$69,736

$86,399

100 0%

A ll of the counties experienced sign1f1cant and consistent retail sales increases,
with most of the sales volume accruing to Emm et County In 1958, Emmet

...
L.,

1Vilican -Leman &amp; Associates, Inc, Central Bus iness Di strict Study, City of Petoskey,
August. 1968, pages 3 and 3A

\.......·

I

L

-62 -

�-·

•

_.._

___ ~-•·--'
-

"I

J ,·

• .,

,..

accounted for 43.1% of the regional sales volume . This share increased another
one percent by 1967 As indicated from the following data, the City of Petoskey
has regained its dominant 1958 retai I position in 1967 by accounting for 79.9% of
Emmet County's retail sales

Census of Business Years
1958
1963
1967
County Sales as a Percent
of three-county region

43.1%

43.0%

44.1%

Petoskey Sales as a Percent
of county sales

79 .0%

75.8%

79 .9%

$5,229

$7,243

$7,654

Non-Petoskey Sales Volumes
(in $1,000)

Sales in areas of Emmet County that are not 1n Petoskey increased slightly
between 1963 and 1967 After discounting for inflation, there may have been
little or no increase in the more rural areas

SEASONAL VARIATION IN SALES
The exact impact of summer residents and tourists on local retail sales cannot be
precisely ascertained . Ari estimate of seasonal variance does, however, portray a
significant tourist contribution . The estimate depicted in TABLE 14 shows that in
Emmet County and the five surrounding Counties' "comparison" retail sales run
approximately 20% higher during the months of June, July, August and
September than the Srate or Detroit Sr.andard Metropolitan Statistical Area . The
percentages were derived from 1966 Michigan sales tax records .

• •w I

·..!-.-_.•·• • .::
. JO... '

• .,

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

i

l

-63-

�'•

I
I~
.l
Ij
Ij
I
I~J
I.

'

I

TABLE14
SEASONAL VARIATION OF COMPARISON RETAIL SALES

~

.,,
.J

I

Five
Surrounding
Counties

Emmet
County
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
Total

State

5.3%
6.5%
4.9%
10.9%
4.9%
7.2%
59%
4.2%
7.1%
7 8%
89%
8 2%
13 4%
7.4%
48 1% 14.7% ·464% 8.0%
9.4%
8.4%
7.6%
8.3%
7 6%
9.0%
10.3%
14 1%

5.0%
4 .7%
5.1%
6 .0%
7.4%
9 .0%
13.4%
16.1%
9.6%
7.5%
7 3%
9 .0%

100 0%

100 .0%

32 .0%

100.0%

SOURCE: Michigan Sales Tax records, Treasury Department.

EXISTING RETAIL CENTERS
Emmet County's retail uses are illustrated on the map, "Existing Commercial
Land Use" . Uses in the Cities of Petoskey and Harbor Springs are not included on

1-,
•

i

11
11
I;
~j

. ·,
" ;,_"

I~
u

l -1,..
r

,

•

II
}

the map because the bu si nesses are concentrated in too small an area to show on a
County-wide map . Separate planning studies for these communities detail
commercial uses.
Commercial uses are reasonably concentrated in rural areas, where in some
instances, the entire shopping function is represented by a single general store
Some scattered and strip commercial is evident along US-31 between the
Mackinaw Bridge and A lanson . Beginning near Oden, the incidence of
development increases, becoming densely developed from Petoskey's CBD 10 the
Harbor Springs Road . Similarly, commercial has developed along US- 131 south of
Petoskey and on US-31 to the west.
Major concentrations of commercial uses 1n Emmet County occur in the areas
with the most year-around population Highways linking the urban centers and
rural service communities support restaurants, motels, gasoline stations, and gift

-64-

.

' -'

-

-

--

--

-

-

~

-

-

-

- - - -- ~ ~ - - -- -

�I
shops. The fact that the rural service centers are quite small is evidence that
tourist sales alone are not sufficient to support a wider range of business service in
outlying areas. The picture of commercial use suggests that the tourists gravitate
toward the larger centers of Petoskey and Harbor Springs for all but minimum
essential purchases .

RETAIL CENTER PLANS
Future retailing in Emmet County cannot be measured with the same accuracy as
past and existing trends. However, all of the projection indices of metropolitan
growth, local population increases, and tourist business projections establish a
sound economic basis upon which to plan retail center improvements. The actual
impact of future development within the major trade areas of the County will
determine which centers can be improved or expanded to the greatest degree.

'

·I
I
I

Retai ling in Emmet County has a bright future in terms of the following :
The County is a geographic terminus for tourist travel in the northern Lower
Peninsula. It is a major destination area .
Interstate freeways link the region with growing metropolitan centers. There
is good access from Detroit and Chicago and these routes are continually
being improved .
The County is centrall y located within a complex of major ski resorts and
benefits from year-round tourist business on a high level.
Local population growth is progressing at a reasonable rate, and gains have
occurred in diversified rranufacturing .

I
I
I
I
I

Although the County has experienced growth, much of the development has
concentrated in the Petoskey-Harbor Springs area . Several northern townships
are expected to hold a stable permanent population, with some slight growth. If
past trends continue, a few rural townships may lose population.
Following is a summary of retail center plans for Emmet _County:
1.

Petoskey CBD Plan
The long-range development plan of Petoskey's Central Business District is
described and illustrated in detail in the report a_nd , plan,~ of Pe.toskey's

-65-

I
I
I
I
I

�ICentral Business District, a separate "701" 1unded report. The overall
objective of Petoskey's CBD Pian is to create ·a central community area that
is attractive and can function as the comparison shopping and governmental
focal point of a wide regional area
2.

Harbor Springs
The City of Harbor Springs has a sound base upon which to plan future retail
center improvements. These relate to the high value investments in seasonal
homes in and adjacent to the City, large marine facilities and services, and
the increasing popularity of winter sports act ivities in nearby areas.
In the County Plan, Harbor Springs is classified as a major conven ience
center and has a large convenience trade area . It is expected that th e Cit y
will expand as a major retail center in the County and probab ly w ill progress
to include more comparison shopping functions.
Specific plans for Harbor Springs' retail center have not been prepared as a
part of this report , since the Cit y is engaged in a separate comprehensive
planning program .

3.

1--_.

Although the central retail area of Mackinaw City is not in Emmet County ,
this community and the City of Cheboygan exert a strong trade influence in

I-

the northern townships of Emmet . For the purposes of County 's retail
center plan, it is assumed that Mackinaw City will pursue programs to plan
and improve retail areas .

I;I
l,.: .,.

Being positioned out of the County , no specific retail center for Mackinaw
City has been prepared .

l ;:-1
►

Mackinaw City

l

4.

Minimum Convenience Centers

1 ---.
.......

lr..1.
'L-:..t

1.~

In addition to the larger City retail trade centers, there are several villages
and unincorporated places that provide minimum retail facilities . These
centers provide services ranging from a general store to several shopping
center uses, as in the Village of Alanson . In addition , the minimum
convenience centers are supported by touri st lodging facilities and perhaps
some general commercial activity as wel I

L•

I ' ..
I:·
.

'

'_,

[

I

-66-

�-

-·

I. . . . . . . . .__

Following is a description of six Minimum Convenience Centers in Emmet
County. The basic design principles expressed in these plans relate to :

·I

Consolidation of scattered retail uses into expanded retail shopping
centers.
Provision for off-street parking to increase retail sales capacity .

-i

The addition of landscaped areas and street trees to make the centers
more attractive.
a.

Alanson Center
The Village of Alanson is the third largest retail center in Emmet
County . Alanson's retail activity should be concentrated on US-31 with
parking behind the stores. If possible, a large community park should

.

J

be developed along the Crooked River. This would attract tourists,
boating enthusiasts, and fishermen who use the River. A large central
parking lot would be able to serve the retail stores as well as the park .
b.

Carp Lake Center
Retail services in Carp Lake are largely tourist oriented, and there are
numerous tourist lodging facilities situated around Paradise Lake .
Existing uses include: Gasoline stations, marina and boat livery,
sporting goods and hardware store, a grocery store, and several motels
and cabin courts. The existing pattern of development is crowded, with
little room for expansion .
Future expansion at the Carp Lake Center will be difficult and
expensive to achieve because of existing development. However, if an
expanded market is desired, two critical objectives must be reached.
First, the retail area must be enlarged to provide room for building
expansion and off-street parking . Second, some landscaped open space
should provide open views of Paradise Lake.

c.

Cross Village Center

I
I
I
I
I
·I

The retail potential of Cross Village is strongly oriented to the summer
tourist season . It is reas6nable to expect some lake lot subdivisions to
result in year-around resort dwellings. Also, there are a number of farms
located in the surrounding area to support basic services .

-67-

I
I

�.,. L____

r··.:...
.•

J

•r·

--

,,
- -i..·~--J

~ ..~..•:·-,....

('.... ...

~ r··

r·.
i.....__

.... _

-

.. --- - - ~- -·- ·-

.

-· ·---~ .J--· ., ., . ··!,: .•

t ·; ,J\

'·_ ·' .

.. . -,-- ~

·- --·:- ---'))

_ __

~
~ ~ ---.. ,
,

..

.

,. ,

,.~~

".. ~.
!,...
I" .
I

(J

□
,• •,. r

_;

i.·•

~
~

..,

·, ,

t..::::'...

!~~ , /

0

PROPOSED
EXISTING
-

SHOPPING

CENTER

COMMERCIAL

TOURIST

LODGING

~

EATING

II

~

GENERAL

COMMERCIAL

r;•·;r;-;--;i

OFFICE

PROFESSIONAL

[ _v~
X

*

SHOPPING

USE

r--P-- "'I

SHOPPING

8

( □- CABINS I

\. -

-

-

-

CENTER

COMMERCIAL

CENTER

PARKING

- ,I

~
~ BEAUTIFICATION

AREAS

DRINKING

~ INDUSTRIAL 8

[2\ZJ
!?1¥@1

I

~
~•~

~

LAND

LAN D USE

-,Ml ,u,A ■ AHOH 01 THIS G U ,t+1( WAS flNAMCIAUl
AID(O Ht•OUG H A lfOlUI GU,H I fl ..&gt;.. Tt+f OOUl~lN I
0 1 HOUSING AN O UOAH 0 f YHO,,o fl-l l . U"'OU H•l Ult
IA H ,\AN N INO AS$1S1,.t,1C l r lOGI .,. .., 4 \!l"O IIU ') I Y
UCHON 101 0 1 IH I HOUS•lolO ACIQl t•J • AS 1&gt; ,,.tNrfr,
AO"' IHl5U ll D n ' "' /IOCIIIOAN or, ... uMENI or C.O•O•t•Cf

STORAGE

RESIOENTIA L
PUBLIC
vAcANT

8

QUASI

PUBL I C

I t · CHURCHES I

Bu1Lo1NGs
0

s·

SHACKS
HISTORI C AL

S I TE

•

__ SOO---- -atOOO FT

A PPAO ll lWAl(

SC A LE

ALANSON

CENTERS '
MINIMUM CONVENIENCE
EMMET
COUNTY, MICHIGAN

vilicon · lemon 8 assoc . inc.
plannino
consul tan ts

�- -- I
t ,.
i,

'·
l·

'

I .

◊ ~~1 1 /

I'
.
1/·/ /;· ◊L,
I

o l, ~. ,. / ., I
.. ~

I

(,

Twp

HALL

. . . . STA

7

I

I

"'J

/ ~ /

I

~
tei7

• J,; ol ••II E
-; _f~-..
I(

(.°o ,'.

I

;

/

'
l?J•

' ·" .
'
A
t.: ··-~\~' I:' ,\'

~

I'...

....,,_§i

CJ□ 000'°' / L /
-- . y

[·l O O

_/

I :

A

I

;.

1:

~

l A ,c E

•. ;•

•,_; ,' -&lt;J ••

,4• .~

f.••

I

••

CJ,•

I ,r' ,:~• ~• Q,~~/
~~- .•~•i• 0 :
I -~~1;;:{ o ,.
i, -~iii_/
~ ....

0 .,

I

0

EXISTING
-

LAND

USE

SHOPPING

PROPOSED

CENTER

COMMERCIAL

TOURIST

LOO GING

IO - CA 81 NS )

~

EATING

8

~

G E,..ERAL

COMMERCIAL

OFF'I CE

PROFESS ION Al

§:::::::::~;

...

:_:;•;•:•::j

1 •

-

,- - - I
"-P- - _.,r

LAND

CENTER

SIIOPPI NG

CENTER

COMMERCIAL

"\

™

ORIN"NG

BEAUTIFICATION

PARKING

AREAS

• • • "'

'.':::::::::::J

r:•:•:•:•:•:•:~-:,:-:-:-:

tf_iti[f.{![jjfp
f:'r.,~r:!!••~(:,t;1
V
X

*

J

8

INDUSTRIAL

8

STORAGE

'1Ht

,u, . . , . . uoN

o,

THIS GU•H•C

WAS ,.,,U,NCIAU'

... IDfD JHlOUOH A HDU#ll OtloNI i'tOM T+U Df,llt lMUH
HOUSIMG ANO Utl,U• DIYIIOh•fNI \INOU IHI UI
loll'&lt;I t'lAHNtNG ASSIUANCI t'IO(;t.A/1\, AUINOl l lfO If
SfCIION 101 Of THI HOU,1"1G A(1 o, lt'j~ A$ AHINOfO ,
AO,.tl'&lt;li,1u10 If 1Hf flll(IOGAN o, ... .,,.(NI o, (0"11 .. 0ct -

o,

RESIDENTIAL
8

PUBLIC
VACANT

OUASI

PUBLIC

( I · CHURCHES I

BUILDINGS

SHACKS
HISTORICAL

0

SI TE

s-

CARP

CONVENIENCE
EMMET

... .. ...

.)
~

-- -

500

,,PROJtlMAl[

LAKE

MINIMUM

:.-

USE

SHOPPING

...... ,

-

,..____

CENTERS

COUNTY , MICHIGAN

I

•

IOOO Fl

a

SC ALE

vilicon · lemon a assoc . Inc.
plonnin9
con1uttont1

..'..,!) _ .

�C:

-- r-·-··----r
~ L ~ - ~ r . ')
- -~ .

-;

,......· _..'..._.,.

·-·

j: ,~.,....
,.· -...
.....

L:·-

-,
•
·
,
_
,
..
;·-·
-·
'

... ,_
___

-~

'_;_ _. . ~ -

L~

:..:__·-

L ~

1...:..:....·-

-

)

,·

...
I •. -~

r.

◊

~

:v;~
~ ·
~

~

~

.

.½ ◊

,,

, -;,,"' .,,

; ' '1.

~ ..

0-

•

~

LAND

r.

USE

LAND USE
SH OPPING

~

' ,
.,r

.

-

~

i' '

PROPOSED
EXISTING

~S)

/

or--

0

0

'- '

~. _,.oo"

'....
.,.•----

◊

.

"

l - '.

...

:,,,. ',0
""
.,,

.

~~

L.

~~o
~ ~ ...,~~~

o

_,~. ~ &lt;_&lt;i.\

'

.

'\'

C EN T ER

COMMERC I AL

r - - - - ...,

I

~

TOUR I ST

~

EATING

'

LODGING

6

f::0::::::3

PROFESSI O NAL

9

-- __ .,
P

I

~:Tu1@

DRIN K ING

COMMERCIAL

OFFI C E

'--

( □ - CABINS)

~ GENERAL

SHOPP I NG

SHOPPING

CENTER

COMMERCIAL

CENTER

BEAUTIFICATION

PARKING

AREAS

1 HI ,.,, ......,,10M 0, IHI$ c;u,rtuc w ... , IIH,.NCIAUY
A. 1010 l&gt;l•OUO H 4 HOUAl GU.I'll rtOM THI Ol'" UMf NI
O f "4!)0 5 1HO AiND UII AM OI YU O•l'tlHI , UHOU UII UI ,

~ I NDUSTRIAL 8 ST ORA GE

U,M

,uNM INO .. u, u .-.wc f

., oc; ■.., ....

4 Uli• O• ;lt0

11

Of IU ♦ Ai•U•U•IOtO .
AO/ltlNI SllUD IT IIU MtCHIO U• 0 "01Mf N I O f C0MMI I C L

UCUO N 101 O f I H• HOllll&gt;«J "' "

!::::::::::::::&lt;:::::::j

~

RES 10 EN T I AL
PUBLIC

co

VACANT

X

S HAC K S

*

ll

QUASI

PUBLIC

{

t- CHURCHES)

BUI L DINGS

HISTORICAL

o

!IOO

,IPPfl0 • 1MAT £

SITE

CROSS

•

10 00 n

S C.t.L [

VILLAGE

MINIMUM

CONVENIENCE
CENTERSI
EMMET
COUNTY , MICHIGAN

vilicon · lemon 8 assoc . Inc.
plonn i nQ
c on1ullonll
1'

�I

II
~•
□

□ o,r:

.

11111111
I

~

□

□

Ill

~~~~

LIBRARY

E3

; ti

.,

v□ I

..

ill:

r.

El

l
00[

•.r,r, .•
Cl

1 p :'

□□□

'o

CJ

I
I

0

G
ID

IC!I

I

XX X

EXISTING
-

LAND

X

PROPOSED

CENTER

TO U RI ST

LOO G I N G IO - CA 81 N S I

~

EATING

II

~

GENERAL

COMMERCIAL

!:=:=:=:=:~

OFFICE

PROFESSIONAL

~

c=J
ffiW.~~

8

LAND

SHOPPING

,----,
I
P
t
"-----.1

~

DRINKING

INDUSTRIAL

.

.

SHOPPING

USE
CENTER

COMMERCIAL

CENTER

BEAUTIFICATION

PARKING

AREAS

1.:
'"JHf ,u,AU,TIOH Of 1HIS GU,tlUC

STORAGE

WAS flNANCIAlLY

AIOtO IHIOU GH A HDflA\ GU.NI H,JM !Hf

o,, . . u1o1,1H

Of HOU51H0 ANO UOAN O[Vfl0PM(Nf . UHOfl THf Ut-

lAN P~ANHIHO ASSISU,NCI ,_OGIA"l AUJHO.lllO If
SfCTIOH 70 1 Of THt H0U5 1N0AC10f 19'4,,U,U&gt;fHOfO,

RESIDENTIAL

8

PUBLIC

D=:J

VACANT

X

SHACKS

*

-

COMMERCIAL

!•:•:•:;:;:::~

8

I.

X

USE

SHOPPING

I

I
O
I

AOMIHISIU[O l'l'THf MICHIG,.N 01'-l,UliHHT Of COMfOIUCL-

QUASI

PUBLIC

(I - CHURCHES I

BUILDINGS

0

HISTORICAL

APPROXIMATE:

PELLSTON

'

CONVENIENCE

MINIMUM

'5

500

SITE

•.• .

l

i-~ ~

i:.MM ET

~·

;'.1;!.-.,

_._I

CENTERS

COUNTY

, MICHIGAN

-· . . . '_j!: ___

•

IO00 H .

SCALE

vilicon • lemon ll assoc. Inc.
plonnino
con su I ton ts

·_,--·,;

.

?
j

.....

�.,~

·. -.

.

--- ·:.,

'~ 1:

. . ·~ ....

._,. ""

--

..

I
The plan for future development illustrates a gradual "filling in" of
retail uses between existing uses. Off-street parking is located so as to
serve the retail stores and act as scenic turnouts for views over Lake
Michigan . Landscaped setbacks are suggested for State Road to evolve
into a scenic route to the sand beaches and boat landing, which may be
expanded into a larger marina or harbor.
d.

Levering Center
Retail services within Levering are limted although several commercial
services are located on US-31 .
Levering's plan is based on the possible attraction force of a "Ghost
Town" . The original retail shops are mostly vacant, as former retail
enterprises have ceased or moved to US-31 . Another possibility is the
development of a pre-1900 retail street Existing buildings could be
restored to their original design . Main Street could be cobblestoned and
made to function like a pedestrian mall . All parking would then be
provided behind the stores. The restored buildings could be used for
actual retail services.
It the Old Town theme does not evolve, retail services will probably
continue to develop on US-31 .

e.

Pellston Center
Pellston is the largest village in the County and has the largest
concentration of permanent homes outside of the Petoskey-Harbor
Springs area.
The future plan for retail development is uncomplicated emphasizing
basic retail concepts. These relate to retail use concentrations, off-street
parking, and a beautification plaza or mall to act as a focal point.
Added to this would be architectural improvements and pleasing center
appearance .

:_j

I

5.

Other Minimum Shopping Facilities
The previous paragraphs described various shopping areas in Emmet County.
In ~ddition to these, there are other possible commercial locations which
may include shopping center type uses

-68-

�--1

Based upon the distribution and composition of competing retail areas in the
County, ten ( 10) other locations have been mapped to suggest possible
long-term future retail center development.
The location of the ten potential retail centers are illustrated on the map,
"Existing Commercial Land Use." Roughly in the order of their
development importance, these locations are listed below :
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.

Boyne Highlands - Nubs Nob Area
Wlderness Park
Larks Lake
Bliss Center
Resort Township (lntertown and Resort Roads)
Good Hart
West County Line on US-31
Brutus
Epsilon
Stutsmanville

The actual priority and timing at which these centers may develop, will be
dependent upon the rate of future County growth and the distribution of
that growth among the sixteen townships ..
'

-I

I
-I
..
......

:_ I

I

rt

~,
-69-

I
I

�I
INDUSTRIAL

Emmet County's industrial base is closely related to the industrial characteristics
of the northern area of the Lower Peninsula. Although the limits of a region's
economy do not necessarily

limit economic development in a particular

community, there is usually a close relationship between a region's indust rial
character and the ability of local units of government to industrialize . By and
large, the region influences the type and character of industry which is most likely
to be successfu I.
The intent of the Industrial Plan is to identify community areas which have
physical and locational characteristics adaptable to industrial use. Parallel to this
objective is the value of local industrial information to be used in programs of
industrial promotion, including the development of planned industrial districts or
parks.

EMPLOYMENT
In terms of employed labor force, TABLE 15 indicates the breakdown by
occupation within the Coun ty . These figures are converted to percentages and
compared with the State of Michigan . Those occupations contingent to farming

1

1

are somewhat higher than the state average. Craftsmen and operatives are lower
than the State. This was also found to be true in the City of Petoskey . (See
"Petoskey Industrial Study", March, 1969)
Managers, Officials, and Service Workers have higher proportions than that of the
State . This reflects in part on the motel and tourist trade in the region . The
remaining categories are relatively similar to State averages.
The categories most oriented to manufacturing industries (craftsmen, operatives,
laborers), have a smaller percentage of the employed labor force than the State
average This is partly attributed to the dominance of retail employment to serve
recreation tourist services, as well as the general lack of industrial activity .

:.....

I
I.'

An overall analysis of regional industrial characteristics shows a relative industrial
disadvantage for the northern counties of Michigan, since actual employment
levels declined . Emmet County's 1950-1960 decrease was at a rate equal to the
northwest region of the Lower Peninsula Petoskey 's loss was slightly greater than
the Emmet County rate. Some re-evaluations o·n the basis of 1970 Census
statistics should be completed .

-70-

�..: •

.

..: -

.

-·

i
TABLE15
1960 OCCUPATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
Emmet County
Michigan
Number Percent Percent

Major Occupational Groups

Professional, Technical
and Kindred
Farms &amp; Farm Managers
Managers, Officials and
Proprietors
Clerical and Kindred
Sales Workers
Craftsmen, Foreman and
Kindred
Operatives and Kindred
Private Household Workers
Service Workers
Farm Laborers and Foremen
Laborers
Not Reported
Total Employed

Relatic,n
to State

550
228

10.6%
4.4%

11 .5%
2.2%

Same
Higher

632
581
411

12.2%
11 .2%
7.9%

7.3%
13.9%
7.4%

Higher
Lower
Same

666
681
254
635
· 78
326
132

12.9%
13.2%
4.9%
12.3%
1.5%
6.3%
2 .6%

15.4%
22.2%
2.2%
8.7%
0.9% :
4.0% '
4.3%

Same
Much Lower
Higher
Higher
High~r
Higher

5,174

100.0%

.-.I

J'

100.0%

SOURCE: U.S. Census of Population, 1960.

Of the eleven ( 11) cpunties in the Northwest Economic Development District,
Emmet County has the fourth largest labor force ranking behind Grand Traverse,
Manistee, and Wexford Counties.

I

Among these four largest labor force counties in the region, Emmet ranked :

I

First In :
Private household workers
Second In :
Construction
Other Personal Services
Communications
Food
Eating &amp; Drinking
Hospitals
Other Professional

-71-

�-·

...-

.,··.

-.

,·:...:.....

I

-;

Third In: ·
Agriculture
Other Transportation
Wholesale Trade
Other Retail
Entertainment
Welfare and Religious
Industry Not Reported
Fourth In:
Forestry and Fishing
Mining
Manufacturing
Railroads
Trucking
Utilities
Bu siness Services
Repair Services
Education
Public Administration
Finance and Insurance
INDUSTRIAL PLAN ELEMENTS
Based on the existing employment characteristics of the County and general

1_j

economic conditions related to manufacturing industry, it can be concluded that:
The area's economy is premised on a retail-service trade with emphasis on
tourist spending .
The labor force of Emmet County is oriented to service-retail occupations
and is lacking in the manufacturing skilled labor .
The region is removed from the major metropolitan centers of the State and

11
'~'

'1
'

I

~

I~
.

thereby removed from large labor markets, major transport sy stems, and
market areas.
Labor diversity is a limiting factor in attracting industries that are able to
function in this economic area of the State .
Future industrial development may occur on isolated parcels until some
basic changes in transportation sy stems of the area are completed .

-72-

i.....!

�,·

•,.:.·.

_ --.!... .:~ •,. ·.: ..... .• ~..... _ .. 1••:··.:....!_.;_

-1
-1
Future population growth will be affected by future industrial development
as well as increased tourist recreation services.
It may be possible to see small scale machine shops, fabricating plants, electrical
machinery and similar industries come to Emmet County at a gradual pace as in
the past. The diversity and pace of future industrial development will be affected
by the following :

I
I

There may be a natural trend toward industrialization in the smaller urban
areas as an answer to problems of overcrowding in major metropolitan areas.
The future US-131 freeway will provide better access to the southern parts
of the state and wi 11 enhance transportation efficiency .

I

Open lands suitable for industrial development near the Pellston Airport may
spur substantial economic growth in this central region of the County .
The provision of new community water-sewer systems as well as the
expansion of existing systems .

EXISTING INDUSTRY
For the purposes of the County Comprehensive Plan, industrial uses include a
variety of activities related to manufacturing, processing, storage and
transportation . However, the key area of industrial promotion and industrial
development involves manufacturing and fabrication processes .
From industrial questionnaires, a fairly complete list of locally manufactured and
processed material can be presented . The list below illustrates the diversity of the
County's industry and it can serve as a guide to industrialists who may wish to
supply materials or utilize local products.

Welding Services
Custom machine work
Wire products (steel)
Automotive wire assemblies
Decorative hardware for automobiles
Die casting and plating
Electrical controls
Sheet metal
Foundry Products
Molded Aluminum castings

-73-

Die and design of molds
Building blocks and concrete products
Laminated hardwood products
Bakery products
Threaded fasteners
General manufacturing (custom jobber)
Limestone for cement industry
Cement
Gravel extraction
Components for Industrial
conveyor systems

I
""I
I
I
I
I
I
I

~,
I
I

�.) •

.~

... - ·•

. .J'I'"'.,.

·--

~- ~~

-·

I

Ir"\
j

II

I
I..
l

TAB LE 16 summarizes the results of the industrial questionnaire conducted in
late 1968 and early 1969. It is noted that only one industry began operating in
the County since 1960 and two date back to 1900 and earlier.
Th is suggests a high degree of permanence and stabi I ity among existing
manufacturing plants. Also, the average employment is 84 per plant indicating the
County's reliance on small industries. The Penn Dixie Cement Corporation is the

_j

largest industrial employer with some 230 employees .

'i

INDUSTRIAL PLAN

I
I

1

A favorable trend for future industrial development in Emmet County is the
recent view by government and industry, that pressures in metropolitan centers
can be reduced by encouraging rural area development. It industry is encouraged
northward, does Emmet County want it, and if so, where should 1t be located?
The accompanying map illustrates potential industrial areas in Emmet County
These lands are outlined for their general industrial site characteristics, and not
immediate economic feasibility Criteria used to delineate potential sites include:
Reasonably close access to region serving highways and airports;
Proximity to railroad services as a factor to serve industry as well as
compatible use relationships;
Level to moderately rolling topography;

_j

I

. ;
l,..·_j

Soils that are generally well drained and capable of withstanding structural
loads;
Existing industrial uses, or uses compatible with industrial activity .
Lands that do not conflict with other planned uses and offer minimum
conflicts with farming.

I

-74-

I:

I:
•

!

�TABLE16
COUNTY INDUSTRIAL CHARACTERISTICS
EMMET COUNTY

Plant
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.

Greenwell &amp; Sons
Curtis Wire Products
Petoskey Manufacturing
Control Engineering
Perm Alum
Northern Concrete
Michigan Maple Block
Michigan Bakeries
McLaughlin Company
Circuit Controls Div.
Barnum Brothers Fibre
Penn Dixie Cement

Total
Employment

Transportation Need Year moved
Rail Highway Air into County

3
60
60
125
54
8 avg. 5%
15%
60
27
5%
107
180
100
230

-

-

+90%
+90%
900/4
10%
+80% +20%
90% 100/4
5%
90%
5%
800/4
900/4
5%
95%
5%
100/4
900/4
+900/4

1946
1947
1946
1965
1952
1936
1881
1900
1958
1959
1946

Primary
Market Area
Michigan
Michigan
U.S.A.
International
U.S.A.
N. Michigan
U.S.A.
Michigan
Midwest
Canada &amp; U.S.A.
Canada &amp; U.S.A.

.J

1,014

Total

SOURCE : Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc., County Industrial Questionnaire, 1969.

The above criteria form the basis for selecting potential industrial areas. Within
these, there are specific tracts or sites with varying qua I ities that wi II affect the
type and character of industry to locate therein. These qualities can be considered
competitive features for industrial uses, both within the County and the
surrounding influence area.
Site qualities that will affect industrial development include the following :
Ownership characteristics (1.D.C. or individuals)
Community water and sewage services
Proximity to labor resources, housing areas and other community services
Existing site improvements (grading, clearing, filling, etc.)

I
I

Compatibility with surrounding uses and scenic recreational value
Rail-highway and/or air access characteristics .
The map, "Potential Industrial Sites", illustrates general areas wherein industrial
uses may be accommodated. Some ..areas will rate higher in an industrial land
market because of public water and sewage disposal services, fire protection and
other municipal services . City and urban area industrial parks would rate higher
than rural locations.

-75-

'

�The map also outlines broad community reference areas for orienting industrial
developments. These are the areas of : Petoskey, Harbor Springs, Alanson,
Pellston, and Mackinaw City.
TAB LE 17 summarizes the gross industrial acreages associated with useable land
areas within the broad potential industrial area boundaries (Refer to Pian Map) . If
all of this land were developed with manufacturing industries, it would provide
over 35,000 industrial jobs at the low density of ten workers per acre .1 To this
would be added service industries and other uses to support such a vast industrial
complex .
If Emmet County actively pursues a program of industrial development, the
following program should be considered:
Encourage the formation of an active industrial development corporation . If
organized at the County level, the group would have wide flexibility to sell
the industrial potentials which best adapt to a given industrial operation .
This could be done without regard for the normal limitations imposed by
municipal boundaries. Some particular industrial desires may include:

'

r
.j

on-rail or off-rail locations
forest research environment
agricultural environment

r

tourist-recreation access
airport or landing fields
From within the County select prime potential industrial sites, considering
the following:
-

immediate short-range development

- potential full services (water, sewer, rail, highway, air, etc .), if even
at a reasonable future time
-

avoid outstanding scenic resources and productive farm land

1 For comparison, the City of Flint reported some 37,000 jobs in manufacturing
enterprises in 1960.

-76-

- -- -

-~ --

-

--~

- - --

-

-

-----------

.=--

�TABLE17
POTENTIAL INDUSTRIAL LAND AREAS
EMMET COUNTY
Area of
Community
Orientation

Gross On-Rail
Acreage

Gross Off-Rail
Acreage

Total
Acreage

Petoskey
Harbor Springs
Alanson
Pellston
Mackinaw City

230
None
250
600
420

480
1,000
None
660
230

710
1,000
250
1,260
650

Total

1,500

2,370

3,870

.I

I
I

SOURCE: Industrial Plan Map
NOTES: 1. Acreages are gross estimated useable
areas and allowances must be made for scattered
existing homes, industrial uses, and future
internal streets and railroad spurs, if warranted.
2. The County industrial questionnaire reveals a
comparatively low level of dependence on rail
transportation among the sample industries.
However, the railroad right-of-way can continue
to be· regarded as a site location factor for
planning purposes.

Detail information relative to existing industrial potentials:
buildings (size, facilities, services, etc.)
favorable soi Is
site size
utilities and access

I
I
I
I

Plan the details of an industrial park development. Such a plan would:
- Illustrate existing parcels of industrial ownership and adjacent
community areas which influence the industrial district.
- Outline modules of land adaptable for industrial developmmt,
assuming that the modules can be further subdivided if necessary . A
single large operation may consume an entire module.

-77-

I

�I
_j

~

- Propose thorofares for the industrial district, giving due concern for
the traffic impact in adjacent areas. The industrial and community
traffic pattern must be linked, yet be functionally self contained .
-

Beautification treatment along boundary thorofares and in transition

areas .
-

Provide for manufacturing and non-manufacturing, deed restrictions

and zoning .
-

Acquire options, ownership or development rights to the key

parcels, and implement a promotional program to attract development.
The

development

corporation

can

be

selective

in

locating

manufacturing and non-manufacturing uses so that lands are utilized
effectively and efficiently
- Seek assistance from governmental agencies in funding programs to
build industrial sites, and install vital utility services.
The County Industrial Plan is intended to illustrate the overall industrial
characteristics of the County . The specifics and f inal details relating to industrial
development will rest with County-community groups interested in industrial
promotion and economic development.

~-' !

I,.!
! .l

! :

ijr"\
~

&lt;

'J
J

,''

I

-78-

. 1

~-~

- - --

- - ---

.

�,·. -

,

-

-••.• ~,
~

~

.

I
THOROFARES

Thorofare planning recognizes that there are two principle types of traffic : local
and through. Functionally different, these types of traffic should be physically
separate, but designed into a unified overall traffic system .

THOROFARESTANDARDS
Future thorofare needs in the County will depend on the ultimate amount of
future growth and development. Also, the intensit y of tourist traffic, both current
and future, will influence requi rements
Agencies

responsible

for

street

and highway

construction vary

in

their

recommendations relative to the dimensions that should characterize differing
street types. TABLE 18 indicates the basic purposes and desirable features of the
various thorofare types that were described previously . It is desirable to have
center strips on all major thorofares to allow for left turns and to separate traffic
for safety reasons.
Collector streets should have an 86 foot right-of-way width . They could have
more than the four lanes if less space were provided for sidewalks and planting in
urban areas. However, it would be better to widen such a route to major thorofare
standards if traffic demands warrant .

REGIONAL ORIENTATION
Emmet County serves regional traffic in primaril y a north-south capacity
East-west traffic through the County is restricted to the west by Lake Michigan,
and there are few major east-west traffic destination points.
With the exception of Interstate 75 at Mackinaw City , there are no freeways
located in Emmet County . However, 1-75 does parallel the County line some five
_to six miles to the east through Cehboygan County . Even though Emmet County
is not well served by 1-75, because of circuitous connecting roads, the facility is

:. i

rr\

(l

irrportant in bringing tourists and others into the County's influence area .
The regional highways which currentl y serve Emmet County are all two-lane
trunklines, and there are no immed iate plans to construct freeway s. Long-range
State Highway plans do show prelim inary concepts for ext end ing US-13 1 as a

-79-

�• i

,

.

j
J
Freeway route northward into Emmet County. The final alignment and extent of
this proposed Freeway have not been fully resolved as of this writing , and it will
be a major County responsibility to work out detailed route location plans with
the Department of State Highways.

J

l

Some regional traffic flow conclusions follow :
1.

Highway 1-7.5 from down state areas carries substantially higher average
volumes than other highways which serve Emmet County .

2.

US-131 carries slightly less volume than US-31 based on the annual counts.
Their importance are nearly equal, excepting peak tourist season demands
(winter skiing and summer).

3. , County access from 1-75 appears to be greatest via State Highways from the
Gaylord interchange.
Nearly all major community areas in Michigan are less than a five-hour drive from
Petoskey. Within a forty-mile variance, Toledo, Chicago, and Ironwood are about
equidistant from Petoskey .

I
I
I

~.
I
I

-80-

I
I
I
I
~I
I
I

�I'

I.
TABLE 18
STREET CLASSIFICATIONS AND STANDARDS

Analysis Elements

Expressway
or Freeway

Arterial or
Major Thorofare

Collector or
Secondary Thorofare

Local or
Minor

Primary

Primary

(!=unctions 1 &amp; 2
are eaual)

Secondary

None

Secondary

Long Distance
Major Regional
Land Uses
None

Long &amp; Intermediate
distances
Major municipal
&amp; regional uses
Limited

Short in urban
areas
Municipal Uses
Unlimited

Individual
Uses
Unlrmrted

4 &amp; Over

4-6

2-4

2

None
12 feet
4-25 feeta ·
300-350 feet

0-2
11-12 feet
24-60 feetb
120-150 feet

2
10-12 feet

1. Function of
Movement

2. Function of Access
3, Principal Trip
Length
4. Land Uses Served

5. On-Street Parking
6, Number of

I.

M:,ving Lanes

Primary
Short

7. Number of
Parking Lanes
8. Width of Lane
9. Median Width
10. Right-of-Wly Width

1.:
I

None
86 feet

1-2
9 feet
None
60 feet

: r-"'\
NOTES :
a.

Four feet is the minimum and should be used only with an unmountable
curb and intervening barrier. Since turn i ng movements are not allowed, these
medians may be narrower than on major thorofares. Twenty-five feet is
considered desirable as it permits emergency pull-off on the meoian.

b.

Sixteen feet may be used in instances where turning movements are l•m•ted
However, twenty-four feet is a minimum reservoir area for left turns. S•xty
(60) feet allows for inside merges W!th opposing traff ic flow. Wnere flush or
painted medians are used, this distance may be reduced to tne normal width
of a moving lane ( 11 - 12 feet).

I

__ J'

1_

I~
1
'·

r~
-.,.,

THOROFAREDEMANDS

:.-!

. 1

1-

Based on volume, traffic demands in Emmet County appear to be minimum,
except for certain critical areas in the southerly urban portions. Moreover, there

'

are several forces in the nature of modern traffic that suggest the need for higher
capacity thorofares even if volumes do not give strong justification
particularly true in respect to the following :
1.

Increased number and use of private automobi les

2.

Decline and ceasation of passenger railroad service .

3.

Long hours and inconvenient schedules characteristic of commercial bus
services

-81-

~

This is

----=---~-

�...

~

..

...

·•
•,.

- . · .-~

-:

'

....

.I

:1l
·1
:

4.

Trends toward a motoring vacation rather than spending longer periods of
time at a single location .

5.

I

The heterogeneous mix of vehicles, their sizes, speeds and purpose .

•

~

.

6.

!

'

I

Increased reliance on highway freight rather than rail transportation.

I

The above characteristics of modern traffic are for the most part applicable to
many regions of the nation . However, the impact in Northern Michigan may be
more severe in terms of seasonal fluctuation and declining bus-train services and
the nearness of major metropolitan centers. Some basic traffic information is
illustrated on the rrap, "Traffic Faci lities and Generators."

I

I
'· I

I

THOROFAREPLAN

---:--:-:1

.. '

Emmet County is a comparatively small community of 18,331 persons, according
to the 1970 Census of Population . Projections to 1990 suggest further increases at
a moderate rate, to a population of 22,500 .
Based on the foregoing, it can be stated that the County's future thorofare needs,

I
~ ,:_i
I

including County Roads, will be to correct existing physical deficiencies, continue

I

roadway maintenance, and seek continuing improvements to the regional highway
system.

I
I

US-31 FREEWAY (Proposed)
This is not an entirely firm project by the Michigan State Highway Department.
There are tentative plans, but these are long range unless accelerated funding
becomes a reality . Also, there is no decision as of this writing whether the

~

Freeway would traverse the entire length of Emmet County or even miss the
County . A recent State map shows a Petoskey bypass to Alanson .
There are three basic Freeway corridors that Emmet County can consider for
future implementation . These are described below:
Corridor A
This corridor alignment bypasses the Petoskey Area to the east, extends
northerly just west of Conway and then northeasterly to old US-31
bypassing Oden and Alanson (See "Future Land Use Plan" map) .

-82-

~

�,
.
·• I- I- I- - I- - - - - - I- - - -

'~

~

-·

-

ro:

Uf\PER PENINSULA
tl CANADA

C £CI

--{O ...~~

L

8 A Y
'tUN.

STURGEON

8

A Y

I

---------,I

L~~--r-~------Th ·

,,___JI

s

" t ..... l~
□
L
ll .
~:-----L-d~~

't
(:,

t

r.

~

~

· ~. .

'

I

l

~

~

~f--·-f--·
I

T. 37N.

I

I C

I

II

'

~----t· -:.,---7
I
I

I

a,.-~-l·,~,
I

::

E

R

.
N

f:
~

S

;-~"=:~:

u:: I

r}··-.,·····,:

11

' ~1"1
1'
'

P

..

~•t1•

r

'

!:

1,.

I

"'r~11•
N

J_J

1 --

'

,

I'

,

,

"

I

" -

: ;

-

:

-======~.~-:---·===Jr=========

L ••••

I

:

"

E

W:

.

'

"

•

~

t?

t==,.;:,,&lt;c~L__Jt_J
O-·,s~,o;r--1
11

---,.-----~~

[JI

•

''-----'I

1

~\ · LJ

V

---..-- --

-T'I ] ""' ~'""'"'

·-",

T

.

L" E

..

..

~

!

___ Ji!

!~:=:•-'°~=="="~~ p

::
II

--4r.=,==li,====!:!:o.!.

'

~
~----

II"~

r-

n

:

)~..~

[l
r

1,

D

'

I

\~~~

F

.... ~....

I

·\~~L=,.J~~---------.1;,;-,,

!

'

;

,,,,

u

:

I

::

L·

i"J•u:

I

I

,,,,
,,

NII

: It

~

L 11

":_\

I

•1

TI
II

II

II

"

T

I-· l,L~L,-J)

E

\\

LAKE

. . . .

:=Ie!!'~'!!:11= il =!==;)~-MH~-=~1='3:l=s=!,!~'... --'II

·;1 "''. □,,=I=-=·==:i
l--~~---, v,1 -:;{:_~=,~~:
~!
&lt;
.
fs.
···-f-.~-·~l:
..+--i. . . ,~_,_

.

'

rr

T

R

A

E

R

\~\E

:~ -·.

~

r,/1

I

--,·--~~~:;-~\
'.;~,:
;1

\/

. : 1l.
I

L

D

II

""...
LITTLE

II

INDIAN RIVER

1 · 75 a, BURT
LAKE

I

l

r

Tl/AVERSE

8

To :

1.40011

-',I

...

-.J

l . HN.

T ,...

A Y

KT
·-lJ

TO :
CHARLEVOIX

E

A

J

R

··· · · ··· j···-· ···· ·1
G

-· :~1 · r-·

.1

V

A

L

IE

1

L "Jw·,!

"i:$CJ,
,
••
:/ffii?:D~

I

)1

"-:-l•~" ~'Tft
c-=
""-"".:---....
•••·

/ iW
J,.-.. ' ..

Jt• • ••

1 11
~

1

11;~

.;t:k~Rg,,TY

8,300
• 67,,.

1969 ADT VOLUME

a

z

&lt;

eTO :
gWOLVERtNE

..

...

T. ~N.

~81·75

COUNTY

rw

'I. INCREASE SINCE 19~9

PAVED ROADS 8 STREETS

•

EXISTING
-not ,........no..

Of fM1$ G •A•MK w ..., ,it,041+(;1,t&gt;IU
AIOCO , ...OUG.. "flOUAl g.a,. ..,
rHt t&gt;l,.Atl/11,lHT
Of ~SUtG .\NO un.... OfVll~......1, UNIIII IHI l/41.
UH 'IANNIMG A$$1$T41+Cl r•oG•A-.. AI.HftO .. uo U

,ao,,.

UCHON 701 Of TIO ..OUIINC:H,Cf 0, I U.\. A$ "''°'"'OIO,
._""'HtHIO• IT Tltl MfC,110""' 0t,AUIIIIMJ 0, Co.Mftcl.•

.....
yilicon • lemon a ouoc. inc.
plonnin9
con aullonh

!

€lJtg

URBAN AREA TRAFFIC COMPLE~

POTENTIAL

0

SPECIFIC TRAFFIC GENERATORS :
RETAIL CENTER

2

2

INDUSTRIAL

3

3

PARK 8/0R RECREA TION

TRAFFIC
FACILITIES 8 GENERATO·RS
COUNTY

EMMET

I

�£ C I

C

L

II A y

-en~~

UM,

-••-••d

T A ll

AW A

.•'

-➔- - -

~

sruRGEON

B

u

T

+f~

~
- ----•--f
-

A

•

.,,._,_.,_ l

l

:

•-

•-,;'

.
~
~

~

~

_

_

•

•

:

•!.--

_lllJ
111:

--------:+--~ ....
:

_....--,:--,t----

I

:

I
1

•

I

----,--- .

~-

~--

. s ': s
L....,.------- i
l
• '

\i ~

iI

L

11

II -

-

..

4 r= l
II

B

t~...-

#f{
·,_J,-:,

i,

•a

()

'

-

~

+

\: - ,
.. -

~+ r

'

l - I n:;
- I
. . . --

I

-

-.;- :
'
I
:
'

•

·- f

.

-+i

~

· -

II - - - "

,,

___

_\,,,,

,_ •. 111.- - - - ·i

,

-

1

-

-

- - -

_________J\_

\.~ . ,
~---•

..,,

-~

T·s..,_,
I

I

• ""~

I

r·

1,

I
I

.._

__ _ T

i

--i------"
:
••,._ r---:~ ~ ~ _Ij ___
I

l}

I

J==-·
al

[

E
..

·-+1~r

l\..__
11

l .
"
-.;·----➔
S

N ,,

•
I"

~

:,,

H"
,, --I - -- - -- _f ___ _
/;

p

,,

i

,. I

T. Jr&amp;

..,i

___ ,_:

\!~

.
h D

.___

T

!

'

~•

E

L

1'

.,'

~

"~

....-:::

- - - -- - -

-······
. · ·1~-

I

II

i:

•

._~======== _JL..J

~

·~.::~

I

:"

E

l~

I

---

'

:-- ---1

'

C

♦

:J . ~

1

i!

---....-- -

_

~
1
~--~
1~=1 °:"J_,-_§L_~~~ -~

-\ ~] __J

I.,

c::---,...

i

~-w•

\

..

I

ir
'

....:.=-...1

:

'
1,

.,
:,

-...,,__

•1

I

1r-=-.:.::;;"~-- - --

'

\

\

r'

J:lp

..- -:;,--;.-''

L E

----

•
___ P1!9

E

V

~:

W_

.L-;

•

•

TIR

E

1

11

:

V

I -· ~--':jl !

T. . . .

/

E

. l
II

"

"

.

I . i:..
.

.

~

.

_____'"T____
-J -Ll:.= -..===JJ:--"~===s:i,p
,,
T

T

Lt1 E

1~,

11

I

R

..

·--- " --- ·----;.·----~\,j

:

~
~

LJu

....

,,

•¾

I
I

--~~~---~--G--

I

1:~=='&gt;~, " 1· p J.
';;
,,.,,.;:-:=
: - "&gt;~ ,);.~ J
II

~~

·--11--~ - __,

T

,,

_ __,.

.
i
\
• n-,

l'f

I

t'..-===-=--ae.=--,.A.

JI

J

-

'\'

S \\E

•1;

11

:~---

:!I

l!-~~-f;J
·----,----r:
:
i ::

~ 1---......-~-

...

~

: '~.:~---.;1
1
----f----·. :~
11

I

•

::l

.
1•

~--

\~- -

tt \!)
:ii~
~;.---·- ---·l ~~

..::..

-

-;...._ __ ____

---.---.---1·r--, 11 T.

. r---:

T

&gt;c

...
....

Ll77L£

TRAVERSE

tJ A T

•1
.

.,. . ·.,~J:

•

- -··- - -- - ':N
C
T

I

~"
lj

I
I

. /___ ___ -tI _______ __ !_ ___ _:
j, ___
L
A
,t
~
•
'I

·

Ji:

•

I

[

.....

-

,

I

I

:1

-...

....

......

....
STATE

TRUNKLINE

COUNTY

HI GHWAYS

MAJO,. THOROFAR(S a P'RIMARY COLLECTORS
tH, TO IZ:0 'EET OP lltl.HT - OP•WAT)
.,,,.. _...,.ltON 0, -

~

OTHER STREETS

WU -..C•••.H

_ _ .. ,........ 00.....i •-""'°'"'"·'N\'tt~Oft. -

a

ROADS

(Al MAl",ED)

...,.'°°",,,,._..,......._....,.
.,,,.-c1 ,-oo•- ,..,,- ,n• u

oP

,._ . _

SUGGESTED ROUTE EXTENSIONS , CHANGES
REALIGNMENTS

MC1t00t , . , Of,. . "°"J»G ..CTDf 1,,.-. •lA•f•O. ..
.._
•..._.,..,.,.-c_N+.,,_,o,, co---c:1.·

a /OR

.....
willco•. lelllCHI • OHOC. Ille.
ploaal111
co•••llo11ts

I

THOROFARE

EMMET

COUNTY

PLAN

~

.3
)!

0

�-I
I
I
I
I
I

Corridor B
Corridor B suggests a limited route in Emmet County . The facility would
approach Petoskey from the south, then swing easterly through Bear Creek
and Springvale Townships to 1-75 in Cheboygan County.
Corridor C
A complete Freeway extending from the south County line to 1-75 in
WaWatam Township . This route is longest, fully bypassing all populated
areas, and is illustrated on the "Residential Areas Plan" map .
From planning work completed to date, it appears that Freeway Corridor "A"
would provide the optimum needed services to the County (State-Regional needs

I

congested old US-31 from Bay View to Alanson is bypassed .

I,

US-31, PETOSKEY TO ALANSON

may vary) . This is true because Petoskey is effectively bypassed, and the highly

Existing US-31 from Petoskey to Alanson is now the most inefficient link in the

11

County's traffic system . Traffic volume east of Bay View averaged 8,300 vehicles
per day in 1969, and 8,700 at the City Limits of Petoskey . With the introduction
of new land uses (Giantway, Wicks, etc), plus existing uses, the volume will easily
reach 9,000 vehicles in 1971 Hence, there is an existing demand for a four-lane
thorofare .
Some planned solutions include:
Widen the present route to four lanes, and/or implement some phases of the
US-31 Freeway Corridor "A" . This could begin as a County Road or State
trunkline (cost factors)
The Hiawatha Trail south of Round Lake may be feasible to develop as a
trunkline thorofare, as it is not developed with uses like the existing route . It
may also serve as a one-way parallel with existing US-31 .

l·i

Local bypass corridors behind Bay View and the Country Club can reduce
congestion in the most critical high volume traffic area .

-83-

�The implementation of an improved Petoskey to Alanson corridor will ultimately
rest with State Highway Department funding and planning programs. However,
statements on preferred routings by City, Township and County Officials will
have a bearing on final route choices.
US-31 BAY SHORE TO PETOSKEY
The present route of US-31 from the West County Line to Petoskey is relatively
efficient for the volume carried . The current A.D .T . volume of 4,100 at the City
Limits is not expected to exceed 9,000 vehicles in the foreseeable future. The
major congestion points are in the City Lirrits from the west line to Mitchell
Street.
Because east-west traffic flow must pass through developing Township areas and
Petoskey, there is merit to considering a "functional" bypass route around
Petoskey. This bypass may be established as follows : Link US-31 with lntertown
Road via Lake Grove; add two (2) miles of new roadway to continue lntertown
east to Valley Road; Valley Road carried northward to Atkins Road, where one
mile of new road would link Boyle Road or Manvel Road with existing US-31.
Four to five miles of new road would complete this Petoskey circumferential
route .
US-131, SOUTH COUNTY LINE TO US-31 IN PETOSKEY
Traffic on this trunkline has increased 53% in the past ten years. When the new
Holiday Inn is open , the volume can be expected to increase substantially from
tourists, conventioneers and others.
The present route of US-131 is being improved by tbe Department of State
Highways. However, if a 131 Freeway is not in the foreseeable future, this road
should be four lanes or improved with passing lanes on hill or curve areas .
M-131, CHIMNEY CORNERS TO HARBOR SPRINGS
This State Trunkline is generally adequate to handle the current volume of traffic
(3,600 ADT) . However, volume increased by 75% from 1959 to 1969 and may
continue as ski-resort operations expand and seasonal home developments
continue . Land uses along the route are tending to mix .
The only major route change on M-131 that may evolve Is in Harbor Springs
where the City's Master Plan shows M-131 bypassing the City, interconnecting
with Lake Street immediately east of the City Line.

-84-

-~

�--I
I
I
I
I:
•. !

I

The highway could be kept efficient by controlling access, providing parallel
service roads, and establishing passing lanes in critical areas.
M-131, HARBOR SPRINGS TO CROSS VILLAGE
Although M-131 carries fewer than 700 (A.D .T .) vehicles, this portion of the
route is an impressive scenic highway with panoramic views over Lake Michigan,
a strong forest wilderness image, and a rolling landscape that changes
continuously .
Future plans for M-131 are mainly in the area of development policy , so that
future land uses and zoning regu lations respect the scenic value of the roadside
and adjacent natural resources .
At the north end of M-131 (also Lake Shore Drive) in Bliss Township, the scen ic
road function should continue easterly to connect with Pleasantview Road and
US-31 at Carp Lake .
US-31, ALANSON TO MACKINAW CITY
The highway from Alanson to the Bridge has been characterized by a dec lining
traffic volume, ranging from -7% at Alanson to -41% at Carp Lake .
With declining volume trends and a 1969 A.D .T . volume of 3,100 in Alanson,
major route developments are not likely to be necessary in the foreseeable future .
However, if a US-131 Freeway terminates at US-31 (near Alanson), US-31 should
be widened to four lanes.
Limted access status might be considered for US-31 before all of the route is
developed with scattered uses.
PLEASANTVIEW ROAD

11
. I

This road runs north-south through the center of Emmet County and is most
important as a recreation service road for Boyne Highlands, Nubs Nob, and
recreation home sites in the area .

'-"-'

-85-

I

�Functionally, Pleasantview _
Road should be a recreation route. It is scenic, and in
addition to serving some important land uses, would be excellent for tourists who
have traveled Lake Shore Drive or US-31, and wish to return by an alternate route
(or vice versa).
STATE ROAD, HARBOR SPRINGS TO CROSS VILLAGE
State Road is a direct inland connector between Harbor Springs and Cross Village.
No major design changes are foreseen, except to maintain safe traffic flow .
Normal design activity would center on sight distances, curve radius and the like.
OTHER ROUTE IMPROVEMENTS
Other alignments and route changes that may be considered are illustrated for :
Atkins Road extended into Petoskey
Howard Road extended south from the North Central Michigan College area .
Wilderness Park Drive at Mackinaw City . It may be desirable to develop a
new park access road with stronger wilderness image qualities.
New County roads will evolve with the design and development of residential
subdivisions and industrial districts.
The "Thorofare Plan" map illustrates a County-wide system of roads, streets, and
State trunkline highways that comprise the key elements of an overall traffic
system . Whether or not all of the planned routes should be major thorofares
(minimum 120 feet of right-of-way) or Collector Street (minimum 86 feet of
right-of-way) should be a matter for consideration and adoption in the years
ahead .
In general, it will be difficult to acquire rights-of-way beyond the existing 66 feet
in most instances where the roadways are already developed with even a few
scattered homes. Nevertheless, there are some priority routes and portions of
routes that should be widened to assure future traffic capacity, efficiency and
safety .
The mapped portions of the following routes should be given priority designation
for action to implement wider rights-of-way .

-86-

�Suggested
Right-of-Way
Width in Feet

t
t

120
120
120
120
86
86-120
86-120
86
120
86-120
120
120
120
120
120

Lake Grove
McDougal
I ntertown
Manvel-Valley Alignment
Howard
Sheridan
Atkins
Division
Mitchell
Pickerel Lake
West Conway
La ke
State
Pleasantview
Resort Pike

.

'

It is assumed that the State Trunklines will be 120 feet or over. Freeways would
have some 300 feet of right-of-way .

lj

I:.

,,,
1:~

'I.~;:

·- ·

I.....~
-'

I
I-

-87-

�_..

ri

rr'
_,

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN

1-~
~ ~

I

Emmet County's Comprehensive Land Use
accompanying · "Future Land Use Plan"

~

Plan is illustrated on
map, which portrays

the
the

recommendations, concepts and development goals presented in the preceeding

~

chapters of this publication . The Plan map also summarizes the findings of twelve

lJ

County development.

(12) preliminary plan reports and a Comprehensive Sewer and Water plan. Also
considered are the years of discussion at Planning Commission meetings and the
concensus of thought developed from the analysis of specific problems affecting

The completion of the Comprehensive Plan, however, is only the first step in the
Enabling Statutes directive to "make a plan" for the future development of the

-J

County . Now the plan must be studied and evaluated for adoption . The County,
through its Planning Commission, must embark on the continuing tasks of

t
I.
...:.;

implementation, re-evaluation and perhaps amending basic plan contents from
time to time.
.......

1-J

Many aspects of a County Plan fall outside of the specific jurisdictional limits of
the County . The City of Petoskey , the City of Harbor Springs, the Villages, each
of the sixteen townships, the School Districts, various other governmental and
private

fl
fr

11
1·i
1·l
'--L

___ j

f :J
-i

development

interests, w ill

r·

in

the

long-term

implementation process. However, the County should maintain a leadership role
by

encouraging

sound

development

proposals,

enlarging

the

spirit

of

inter-community cooperation, and participating in programs that need or would
benefit from County involvement . Such developments as the County Zoning
Commission, a proposed County Department of Public Works and/or County
Housing Commission are examples of vehicles through which the County Plan can
be implemented
Emmet County was among several Northern Michigan Counties that increased in
population between 1960 and 1970. This factor adds a measure of optimism to
the planning process because it reflects the workings of positive economic forces .
Moreover, the County is rich in natura l resources related to water, topography ,
and timber, and it will be a major challenge to guide future development along
patterns that will protect a natural environment that is becoming more valuable
each year.

I ·Jr---,
(:

play a major role

-88-

�- -

- -

-

•~~ MACKIN AW CIT

?-r.t·=---~.._. ..

C

E C

I

L

---~

~

t&gt;••·

·~OA'f\•",.;
~.;-=·
c..-, .. /.L tit'.,..

STURGEON

· o"

'it:~IL.rl

l:l:~

___., ~/

lf;,~t,;(:0

v -~d,'rl'
•:9

B ,&lt; y

)((.&gt;

0 ~..

..' v

~

~ I s
lL--~ lr7LJ[
n
-,

.I~

...
I.,

II_

•B

j

L

1
·-:-~cs - . ,r· •.,;;_.

I

'

·==

t

~

. ")l

i,;;

"

'

0,

~

...
.

~~

r;

~

H

S.::::

I

1~:tl1_q~

~

n

..

r~l)e.

'

i;.o,\ ,

0+, .

71

c7

:·

c.l

•

!le

.:,·.,;, J - ~ - J

•J~..,c.

t&amp;u

'-"'•!:;·'. ..:,,, .;, '

, 6:"'Vu e .:&gt; "-~

·•_,~&lt;&gt;c."'1"1:;
'~
:.,, ~
.{;;

~D_~ C.

"'-•
~t.Y

C

~

~ - ·- I.),,

T. 37N

.

'r.'
r.. {,t.

"'
---'..a.-,.C..,c;,
(.

;--.c- .., "

~

, ~ c. e ,.,"',,. t.. &lt;?
,&gt;

~ &lt;.

L-

Ir--"'= :

·c.."c.~_t.;;

(7, ~0...., (! IJl

_.._.. '""' · - . , , ,...,

E

R

~-/'"I"
~".') (&gt;,'=) c-;,

&lt;, '-' € •

,..,..,DI::"
n

N'~

~~,,

-•L'

•

.

'-· l1 .

,,,,

""¥'···,;

.. &amp;-f;=-==:,;;:_, L
-~· ,,
·s~~..:,
_;
=
t~~
.
C
.€~;:- ---: :~=-=-~',
;,s=====,I

l~--.:-=

:,

'"

,,

II

,I

~

.

Hr'r::'hl • (, - '- • -

(;'.lj

II

C "' '
s
r

j

!; ~

.

:

C ('

. Ce,~\

, ____ _ j"_ _ _ ,ll

..

II•

'•sc=~:--=-=-.:)l__JU

R I:: T E

,

lr' I

T ...

II

::

1,

Ii
11

ll

II

i-:::
i~~~

~&amp;.:~
-;·r~· ,

►~

··t.a."'wr
.I,"
~~ ~ f~i
:
I

~(;,~k~ .

','J

A'.:l!"j

L

D

T ...

"
LlrTLE

r R A V E R SE

B

A

Y

TM•

( .

.....

I

t•:•··-=-~

ED

'"TtOI

- ···''°"

Of

-.

c.-.. "'"4;

W A S

~

P'U8LIC

a

lt[CJHATION

OUAII • P'UeLIC

,-011111..l Cl,.TIU.lr. ltOAD CDIHttSSION a41u.ar.

. . . ,-OTUnlAlr. Atltl"'OltT (ll,-ANIH&gt;N Olt elr.101 PATN
COJIITIIOL .-,u. AI

ff .

... •AJtlttAI

01,..., _.., oP

....
K • \.I

•

t IXIITlttl a

Ea

,ulLIC SCHOOLS

-

COMWEltCIAL

~

TOUJttST S[ltYIC[S

tl"'IIOl'OIIED l'ITOSltlEY A•ll• lLtMIJtT4•Y I C1400LI

a

...... c .. .

a ltlSOIIITI

1911

I

FUTURE
LAND USE PLAN
EMMET
COUNTY

P'All'llt •

ITATI

,oll'[ST Altf.AS

, 01t[ST

8&gt;

l1t0,,-1Na

'IIT

wiliCQII • 1•111011 a ouoc. i11c.
plo1111l11g
• co1111tllo11t1

~
~

OTN[ft OP'f.11 SP'AC( lt(SOU,.C[I. SC [NIC lttYUt ·
LAil( COJUIDO,.S,au,,t,u . AND COMMUNITY
lt[Clt[ATION ~TINTIAL

P'ltOPOltO)

~ INDUIT-IAL
••

HOP'OltD IHJOft TMOttOP.,t(I a COLL[CTOltl

~

lt[IIDENTIAL

P'UILIC P'AltKS

•

o ,,u ,

,_,,.,..

- '"~ .. "°'·""'ef"*'~••""'·
°"'""" ,-o- ''"- C&gt;f,,...,...,~
_ ,,..to..,,... - c C:o-.cKt.·

IXIITINe 11.IJOlt TMOttO,.Alt[I • COLL[CTOltS

LOW TO M[DIUM OlNIITT •ISIO[NTIAL

lt[Clt[.ITfON

Of MOV~
. _ 1,1. . . . ,.
~
MN ..,_..,...., _ ••t•SI •...C l P-001'4' AWTl+C»IUD U

U CJ IOl,l 1 .1 Of fNI '"04./ IIIOG AC fOf lH,, Al••l -

.....
MEDIUM TO Mf8M DDtStT, •rstDIN'flAL

~

lm!1m

~

TNIS "'-.AN IS IJt T lt:titOID TO SMOW &amp;INIIULIZID L41t0 MSI 4NC&gt; .. JIIOT
IIIITUtOID TD IIIIDIC4Tt ,..tClll l lZl, . ... ,.., N DflillltSIOfil. T N[H

P•OPOl•L S •tP''-lC:T fJVTllltl LA•UH,131 lt[C-O••U•D•TIC&gt;kS •NO DO
ttOT 1111c11•••1LY 1......T SWC&gt;ltT " • - c

•1zo••··

PltOPC,S.ALI.

~

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008141">
                <text>Emmet-County_Master-Plan_1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008142">
                <text>Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008143">
                <text>1971-04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008144">
                <text>Future Land Use Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008145">
                <text>The Future Land Use Plan for Emmet County was prepared by Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc. in April 1971.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="37">
            <name>Contributor</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008146">
                <text>Emmet County Planning Commission (consultant)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008147">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008148">
                <text>Land Use--Planning</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008149">
                <text>Emmet County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008150">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008152">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008153">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008154">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008155">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038315">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54689" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58960">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/6866c4102ef27cd587d98ddabcb889bf.pdf</src>
        <authentication>287ce2aa2c2907172b924a09a9c85d31</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008140">
                    <text>COMPREHENSIVE
RECREATION
PLAN

�"· FROM THE LIBRARY OF
'Planning &amp; Zoning Center, Inc.

I

I

I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I

COMPREHENSIVE RECREATION PLAN
Emmet County

PREPARED FOR:
EMMET COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
MARCH, 1970

PREPARED BY:
VILICAN-LEMAN &amp; ASSOCIATES, INC.
COMMUNITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS
29621 NORTHWESTERN HIGHWAY
SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN 48075
CONTRACT ITEMS:
B-1, Part, B-4 and B-5

�CONTENTS

I

-F OREWORD

I

INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY INFORMATION

I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

INTRODUCTION

1

STATEMENT OF COUNTY RECREATION GOALS

2

COUNTY RECREATION ANALYSIS

5

DEVELOPMENT OF RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES

6

THE NEED FOR PLANNING STANDARDS

8

SUMMARY OF RECREATION CONCEPTS

9

COUNTY RECREATION ANALYSIS - REGIONAL DIMENSION
RECREATION TYPES

12

PRIVATE AND SEMI - PRIVATE RECREATION

14

BROAD SCALE RESOURCE INTERPRETATIONS

18

BROAD SCALE RESOURCES OF EMMET COUNTY

21

COUNTY RECREATION ANALYSIS - LOCAL DIMENSION
LOCAL RECREATION DIMENSION

25

CONCEPTS AND STANDARDS

25

POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS

27

INVENTORY AND DEMAND

28

LOCAL RECREATION PLAN

32

COUNTY - WIDE RECREATION PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS

48

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

I
I

-

ILLUSTRATIONS
SELECTED RESOURCE INVENTORY

19A

CONCEPT SKETCHES :
MICRO CLIMATES

21A

SOIL SURVEY

22A

SCENIC AND RECREATION RESOURCES

23A

NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL-PARK CONCEPT

26A

RECREATION PLAN

47A

T 'A B LES
SELECTED PRIVATE AND SEMI-PRIVATE
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES

15

2.

PUBLIC RECREATION LAND INVENTORY

29

3:

LOCAL RECREATION NEEDS

33

1.

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

I

I
I
I

FOREWORD
This is the fourth (4th) in a series of Preliminary Plan reports for Emmet
County, Michigan, and contains the analysis of recreation at both the regional
and local leveL

Preliminary Comprehensive Plan reports are published to enable ci t izens, organi zations, and others interested in the future of the County, to review initial find ings before a final plan is adopted.

Any comments or suggestions on this material

w ill be welcome subjects for discussion and consideration by the Emmet County
Planning Commission .

The preparation of this report required the cooperation of numerous officials and
agencies concerned with resources and recreation in Emmet County.

Hence,

credit for much of the resource data contained in this report and related County
planni'ng· reports must be accorded to the following :

Mr . William Grimm, District Conservationist, U.S. Soil Conservati on
Service, Boyne City
Mr . Robert 0. Dodge and Mr . Lawrence Miller, Parks Di.vision, Michigan
Department of Natural Resources, Lansing.
Mr . Edmund J . Ecker, Area Forester, Michigan Department of Natural
Resources, Indian River.
Mr . Stephen Swan, District Fisheries Biologist, Michigan Department of
Natural Resources, Gaylord.

' ' The preparation of this report was financially aided through a Federal Grant from
the Department of Housing and Urban Development, under the Urban Planning
Assistanc,e Pr·ogr·am, a _u thori'zed by Section· 701 ·o( the Housing ,Act of 1954, ?-S
amended, admi:nistered by ,the Michigan Dep'.a rtment .of Commerce. 11

�INTRODUCTION

&amp;

SUMMARY INFORMATION

�I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

INTRODUCTION
In man's attempt to flee the high density urban environment he has created, he
rushes on weekends and vacations to the countryside.

"Man depends on nature,

and since he cannot live without the natural environment or iri an environment
modified beyond certain limits, the preservation of nature and its resources
1
becomes the first and basic goal. 11

Past and current trends with regard to recreation indicate a mounting impact
upon those areas endowed with scenic natural resources.

Increases in metro-

politan population, coupled with more buying power and greater mobility, will
place new demands upon recreation facilities available to the public,.

The north-

ern region of Michigan's Lower Peninsula offers vast recreation potentials for
the future leisure-oriented public, and as highway and air traffic facilities continue to improve, tourist visitation will become larger and more frequent.

In addition to tourists, the State's northern resources offer an outstanding outdoor environment to its residents, who should assume the responsibility for
retaining the quality of the environment.

Outside pressures will be exerted in

increasing quantities throughout the region, and on;y through advance planning
and concerted action can the area avoid the depletion of environmental resources
experienced in and around metropolitan areas.

This is an exacting process that

will demand innovative approaches to recreation home subdividing, road building,
community development, and wilderness sanctuaries.

The region must be satis-

fied with being a mere reflection of development techniques used elsewhere, but
must imaginatively combine the vast recreation re&lt;Sources found among public
and private lands with the most up-to-date development concepts.

Doxiadis, Costantinos A. Emergence and Growth of an Urban Region - the
Developing Urban Detroit Area
Volume 2, Detroit Edison Company, 1967,
Page 29.

-1-

�I
I
I
I
I
I

STATEMENT

OF

COUNTY

RECREATION

GOALS

The goals and objectives of the Recreation Plan for Emmet County are presented
at two levels :

short-range and long-range.

While these goals are presented

separately, they are closely inter-related and depending upon circumstances at
the moment, a long-range goal may be implemented before a short-range goal.

SHORT - RANGE RECREATION GOALS
Improve facilities at existing community parks and expand parks to serve
citizens in the County.

I
Existing public lands owned by 'townships_,, villages

I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

i

the County and school

districts should be given priority consideration for recreation-community
facility development.

If applicable, design local parks to serve visitors and tourists as well as
community residents.
the multiple function

While local recreation demands should have priority,
concept is an important consideration.

Provide specific recreational facilities and parks to serve the needs of
children, youth, young families, adults, and retirement age citizens, as
demand indicates.

Develop necessary administrative procedures, citizen committees and/ or
official park commissions to oversee the evolvement of a complete parkrecreation system.

Desirably, a recreation system should include County

parks or coordinated local recreation systems at the County level.

Utilize available funding programs from state and federal agencies to
implement recreation plans in the County and municipalities within the
County .

I
-2-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

'

Encourage the preparation of detailed site plans and working drawings to
guide actual improvements to recreation areas.

Promote park usage with adequate signs or other measures to identify available facilities, especially when tourist interest is a factor.

LONG-RANGE AND CONTINUING RECREATION GOALS
Ad.opt zoning ordinances, subdivision regulations and other development
controls which recognize recreation and natural resources as a vital element
of community responsibility.

Promote an equitable distribution of parks, recreation areas and facilities
in the County.

Inform private recreation investors of County resources £or outdoor recreation and of proper development standards to meet present day requirements.

Guide community improvements so that gradual progress 1s made to enhance
the potential for development of private outdoor recreational facilities.
Basic improvements include :

electric power, natural gas, road improve-

ments, airports, and related .

Preserve historic areas for their cultural value in the County as well as
for their tourist appeal.

Protect wildlife habitat areas from pollution, drainage, and other depletion
acts which may alter the ecological balance between wildlife, resources
and man.

-3-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Acquire or otherwise insure the preservation of outstanding natural features
which may or may not have been inventoried in this Plan, but which fall with;,. _
in the principles of sound recreation planning for Emmet County and the
communities therein.

Coordinate over-all recreation planning and development with individual
communities, state and federal agencies, sportsmen clubs or associations,
private recreation entrepreneurs, and others, with County and regional
recreation objectives.

This suggests that each development be viewed as

part of a larger, more complete, and convenient recreation system.

Evolve a comprehensive system of park-recreational facilities in the
County and communities of the County.

be limited to; community parks, neighborhood parks, recreation buildings,
recreation structures, swimming beaches and other specific facilities
necessary to support active or passive recreational pursuits.

I

I
I

Facilities include, but would not

-4-

�&amp;£

I
I
I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

COUNTY

RECREATION ANALYSIS

The purpose of the County Recreation Plan is to serve as a guide in the maintenance, creation and perpetuation of resources, both natural and man-made, as
they relate to the recreation environment.

Emphasis is placed not only upon

resident use and enjoyment, but on the attraction potential for tourists as well.

The County Recreation Plan is a flexible guide, from which orderly growth and
dev elopment may ensue.

It is not meant to be a rigid plan of action that can be

outdated by short-range cycles in recreation desires or changing population
characteristics .

Hence, the implementation of the concepts in this study hinge

upon broad endorsement by County residents who must participate on decisions
to pre-serve the County's outstanding natural environment.

Each recreation project involves considerable detailed planning for site characteristics, use demand, cost benefit analysis and methods for financing.

A single

County Comprehensive Plan cannot and should not answer these details for each
recreational area or potential.

OBJECTIVES
The future of Emmet County as a regional focal point in the area of outdoor recreation will depend on successes in achieving the following goals:

To illustrate where recreational facilities exist.

To familiarize County residents and potential developers with existing resources and environmental advantages.

To guide in the identification and reservation of desirable and needed recre ation sites, recognizing that many unique areas can be diverted to other uses.

I
- 5-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

To propose design standards for preserving and developing the County's
natural resources.

To guide future development based upon a projected design concept aimed
at unifying the recreational elements of the County.

To insure an equitable distribution of parks, recreation areas and facilities.

To encourage comprehensive outdoor recreation planning at private, commercial and public levels with regard to site development and its compatibility
to the County as a whole.

To point up the need for various means of control in natural resource development.

This analysis of Emmet County's Recreation Plan begins with an inventory of all
major recreational features in the County including soils, topography, scenic
areas and man-made facilities.

These are viewed in terms of the County's region-

al setting and the various types of recreational activity that is in demand.

The

proposed plan is a synthesis of the inventory, adaptable recreation features, and
the overall concept of recreation applicable to the County.

DEVELOPMENT OF RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES
The provision of all recreational facilities discussed in this report lie beyond the
County's present and foreseeable financial capabilities.

However, the County, as

a unit of government, should not be singularly responsible for providing all such
facilities .

It is nontheless recognized that recreational resource potentials must

be preserved until adequate parks, trails, beaches, and water bodies are needed
and developed .

The realistic achievement of this goal will necessitate cooperative

action between various groups - only one of which will be the County.

- 6-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

,.,

To implement the County Recreation Plan, some new measures will probably be
required to enable or promote cooperative development programs among governmental agencies, quasi-public bodies and private groups.

It is intended that pri-

vate enterprise, in the form of commercial or tourism recreation, be an active
element in the realization of this plan.

To be economically feasible for development, a private resort or recreation area
must have:

The potential to serve a desired use;

A market, or demand;

Design production (number of lots, houses, rooms, facilities, etc.)
to meet a need or deficiency and to pay for the cost of development and
provide a profit to developers.

To be aesthetically successful, the resort or recreation facility must;

Retain the original characteristics of the natural environment that makes
the area desirable;

Be of a quality that co _m plements the natural environment; hence, careful
attention to architectural design, choice of materials, and methods of
construction;

Be an activity which complements or adapts to the natural environment and
adjacent uses.

-7-

�I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

To be successful in a planning sense, the resort or recreation facili t y must:

Be viewed in its total context with the County, northern Michigan and
M 'i dwest region.

Have the various physical elements designed in a coordinated and efficient
manner so as to give diversity and complementary economic support.

See these elements 1n relation to the over-all benefit of the area and the
total environment.

To attain "successful developments 11 in this sense means that we:

Do not overdevelop to the extent that the carrying capacity of the land is
exceeded;

Do not break down the existing systems of plant and animal ecology;

Must develop and meet environmental standards of design and implementation ;

Must avoid those developments that, over a period of years, downgrade
adjacent or potential uses.

THE NEED FOR PLANNING STANDARDS
To encourage sound recreation developments, the County must establish minimum
design criteria and minimum development controls .

This is more critical than

prescribing minimum park acreages per 1, 000 population and will be essential
to protect those natural amenities originally making the County desirable.

Fail -

ure to do this will result in less quality and less ability to maintain a quality
environment for future generations.

-8-

�I
I
I
I

The last twenty years have witnessed vast changes in leisure oriented activities.
There is a definite distinction between resort life in the 1950 1 s and resort life
in 1970.

The camping boom is still on the increase as are first class motor inn

complexes.

Tourist accommodations which supply quality services and quality

environment manage a successful livelihood.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Resort areas of the nation are experiencing a housing boom with regard to seasonal
or vacation homes.

Too many of these developments are carried through w it hout

planning and lack proper concepts for future development.

As a result, we see

our scarce water frontages subdivided into small lots which when built up lose
the natural character and the amenities that originally made the area saleable.
Over-crowding, pollution, poor architecture, poor site planning, inadequate roads,
extinction of the native vegetation - these are some of the factors contributing to
the depletion of what was once thought as a natural resource.

It has happened

in metropolitan areas and it will happen in Emmet County, until development
embodies standards which spell the difference between quality and
building.

11

11

just another

Too often, planning regulations are forgotten at city or village limits ;

too often, people living within scenic rural areas are oblivious to what makes the
area enjoyable until these factors are altered or disappear.

SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS IN OVERALL CONCEPTS
1.

Missionaries - Promote the historically important role of the missionar y
in Emmet County.

Acquire historic sites, build replicas of former

missions, churches, shrines, trading posts, Indian cultural centers, and
related points of interest.

This historical theme is an important c u ltural

heritage which though not unique to the County, is suited to the attractions
of recreation.

I
-9 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

2.

interesting facets of any areas history, including Emmet County.

I
I
I

The

shores of Lake Michigan and communities of Petoskey, Harbor Springs,
Middle Village, Cross Village and Mackinaw City all have a strong history
in Indian culture.

Historical markers, reconstructed Indian v illages,

museums, and related means can be used to express Indian history to the
educational- cultural advancement of tourists and citizens.

3.

Agriculture - Since the County has some excellent agricultural lands, work
toward the continuance of farming enterprises.

Marginal farms may beco·m e

economically sound by adding supplemental activities, such as camping,
hunting, fishing and vacation farm activity.

Farms are necessary for bas i c

food production, they are important economic forces, they support a higher
level of wildlife for sportsmen, and are important in maintaining open space.

4.

Scenic Easement - Scenic easements are means of preserving scenic areas
without taking title in fee.

I
I
I
I
I
I

Indian Culture - The life, habits and history of the Indian people are highl y

Easements would be most logical along rivers

where natural image is important to canoeists and/or fishermen.

Also,

along some roadways where panoramic views may become obscurred by
development.

5.

Scenic Drives - Establish a system of scenic drives to link spe cific recre ation activities and sites with one another .

The concept of outdoor recre -

ation necessarily involves the scenic quality of access routes.

Since Emmet

County benefits from the fall color season, the scenic routes may be multi functional.

At the present time, the main access to the Wilderness Stat e

Park does not present the image of a wilderness recreation area .

-10 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I

6.

establishment of one or more County parks.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

If so, these should be coordin -

ated into the recreation system so as to supplement and operate in harmony
with community parks and state parks.

Some recreational opportunities may

only be established through County level action.

7.

Local Parks - Recreation for County residents will evolve from County
features and tourist facilities.

However, each community within the County

will have specific local recreational demands to fulfill.

I

I

County Parks - A Gounty level interest in recreation may well lead to the

County, school

district, township and village lands should be given priority consideration as
resources for local recreational facilities.

8.

Important to the Recreation Plan is the resource inventory.

A more de -

tailed inventory of soils, plant and animal ecology, and active recreation
sites would strengthen the basis for detailed planning in the years ahead,
and this should be pursued.

9.

Because of the limited funds available for recreational facilities, the County
should encourage the development of recreational facilities through private
enterprise and other public agencies.

(Bureau of Outdoor Recreation,

Michigan State Department of Natural Resources, U.S. Forest Service, et c .)

10.

Standards of design should be developed and incorporated into local de v elop ment controls (zoning, easements, sul:3division regulations, as well as
boards of review) and where possible, applied on a County-wide basis.

-11-

�I

COUNTY RECREATION ANALYSIS
Regional Dimension

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

RECREATION

TYPES

Recreation is recognized as the humi3,n necessity to pursue those activities that
refresh the mind and body, be they achieved through contemplation of scenery,
v isitation of historical sites , close association with geological and biological
forces of nature, or through such activities as boating, skiing, campi.ng, hunting
and other outdoor sports or community activities.

For the purpose of this report,

recreation will be considered in terms of outdoor activities, active or passive,
which are influenced by the landscape environment of which they are a part.

Man

utilizes the landscape to test his senses and he seeks those landscapes which will
provide him with a variety of experiences.

Federal and state involvement in _ recreation is highly interdisciplinary . . It aims
toward the principle of multiple use of natural and man-made resources. Therefore,
state and federal lands, forests, and waters may be utilized for their potential
as spots of scenic beauty, wildlife refuge, or source of commercial timber. F£deral
and state programs are aimed at satisfying regional and continental demands and
usually involve recreation experiences related to conservation areas, historical
sites , natural preserves and wilderness regions.

County and local governmental bodies are, engaged in similar recreation types,
but usually on a smaller scale ,

Moreover, usage is aimed largely at area resi-

dents, except in tourist economy areas, such as Emmet County.

The objective

to satisfy tourist demands may well dominate local recreation planning and development because local needs can be satisfied in part with tourist attractions.

The private sector of outdoor recreation is highly diverse, but may be broken down
1
into the following major components :

1

Thompson , John R . , Parks and Recreation, ''The Giant Nobody Knows", March,

1968.
-12-

�Profit seeking outdoor recreation enterprises:

Ski resorts
Golf courses
Campgrounds

I

Fish and hunt camps

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Vacation farms, resorts and lodges

I
I
I

Riding stables

Swimming pools
Canoe liveries

Non-profit outdoor recreation enterprises:

Voluntary Associations - church groups, YMCA, YWCA, boy scouts, girl
scouts , boys clubs, 4-H clubs
Employee membership only
Impoundments licensed by Federal Power Commission
Private forest lands

Participant - financed outdoor recreation enterprises:

Golf and country clubs
Hunting preserves
Boat clubs
Riding clubs
Swimming and diving clubs
Athletic clubs
Snowmobiling clubs

-13-

�Some of the more interesting dominant characteristics of the private recreation-

r

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

al enterprise on a national scale are :

Average development is small - about 52 acres.
Most endeavors have a low capital investment.
Income is usually supplementary to a regular income .
The majority have no paid employees.
Very little promotion is done .

Many of these characteristics are applicable to Emmet County, and are already
developed to a high degree.

For example, the ski resorts of Boyne Highlands

and Nubs Nob rank among the finest facilities in the Midwest.

PRIVATE AND SEMI-PRIVATE RECREATION RESOURCES
TABLE 1 lists the private and semi - private recreational facilities available in
Emmet County.

Also given on the table are reference locations and approximate

acreages of each facility .

For the most part, the list inventories non-public

recreation resources, and although it may not be a 100% accurate list, it represents the spectrum of private recreation in Emmet County. 1

As a general obser-

vation, private recreational services are regional in their scope of services, and
rely strongly on tourist visitation for economic support.

Like regional public

recreation areas, they serve local needs as well.

The most dominant private recreational resources are Boyne Highlands and
Nubs Nob.

These ski resorts are complete recreation complexes that offer

scenic resources, vacation home subdivisions, con~ominium recreation dwellings,
tourist lodging, restaurant services, _golf and other activities for complete year
around recreation activity .

Snowmobiling_:_- will also become a more dominant

recreational pursuit in this area .

Both ski complexes contain more than 70

percent of the private recreation land inventoried in the County ( 1, 980 acres).
1

Data was derived from the County land use inventory, aerial photographs, County
Plat Book, and Comprehensive Plan Reports prepared for the County, Petoskey,
and Harbor Springs .
-14-

�-------

-----------TABLE

1

SELECTED PRIVATE AND SEMI-PRIVATE RECREATIONAL FACILITIES
Emmet County

,_.
u,
I

Facility ,

Location by Township
or Reference

Northland Drive-in Theatre
Hollywood Theatre
Victory Lanes Bowling
Petoskey Bay- View Count:ry Club
Emmet Sportsmens Club (US-131)
US-131 Golf Driving Range
Petoskey Bowmens Club
Camp Petosega
May Marina
Crooked Lake Yacht Club
Two (2) Trout Ponds
Ponshewaing Marina
Alanson Marinas
Petoskey Playhouse
W eq uetonsing Golf Club
Harbor Point Golf Course
Birchmont Farm Resort
Walstroms Marina
Club Ponytail
5-Mile Creek Community Center
Boyne Highlands Ski Resort
Nubs Nob Ski Resort
Trout Ponds
Boat-Rental
Indian Museum
Marina
Wilderness Golf Club
J ordans Campground
Riding Stable
Trout Ponds
Campgrounds

Resort
Petoskey
Petoskey
Bear Creek
Bear Creek
Bear Creek
Springvale
Pickerel Lake
Oden
Crooked Lake
Littlefield
Littlefield
Alanson
Oden
Little Traverse
West Traverse
West Traverse
Harbor Springs
Little ,T raverse
Friendship
Pleasantview
Pleasantview
Maple River
Larks Lake
Cross Village
Paradise Lake
Carp Lake
Paradise Lake
Wawatam
Wawatam
Mackinaw City

TOTALS

Approximate Use
Acreage
10. 0 acres

.1
•5

110. 0
30.0

5. 0
5. 0
190.0

2. 5
. 1

5

7. 0
. 5
1. 0

.6
153. 0
96.2
30. 0
4. 0

.5
5. 0
1,780.0
200. 0
20.0

.1
.3
.3
90 . 0

6.

0

5. 0
•&amp;
2. 1
2, 7 55. 7 acres

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Some other recreational services from the private sector include :

recreation

farms , golf clubs, marinas, riding stables, trout ponds, camp grounds, and
sportsmen clubs.

Intensive indoor recreati on is provided by club buildings,

bowling alleys, theatres, and playhouse,s.

Although ski i ng has exerted an e x ceptional influence on Emmet County 1 s tourist
economy and has extended the vacation season to year around prominence, summer
recrea ti on related to sand, sun and water is still the predominant tourist volume
attracti on .

Winter tourism can be expected to grow in importance since the

popularity of the snowmobile .

By the spring of 1970 , it has been estimated that there will be about 100, 000
snowmobiles in Michigan .

Add to this the machines that may come from Illinois,

Ohio , Indiana, and other states , and Michigan 1 s w"inter attraction potential looks
considerably brighter .

Emmet C o unty is excellently positioned to become a major Midwest snowmobile
center , and freeways
e x isting levels .

e x tending northward will improve accessibility beyond

The County may well be concerned about the snowmobile in

terms of:

Scenic trails
Winter- camping
Machine sales
Repair services and parts

0££- sea son storage
Servic e centers , with parking , gasoline, food, entertainment, etc.

-16-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

It may not be beyond reason to expect snowmobiling to assume resort proportions , much like ski resorts.

By 1976, winter tourism may be as big as the

summer season . 1

Such a resort could be a year around use of the vacation £arm or dude ranch
s i nce steep topography is not a requirement.

Snowmobiling to be most success-

ful , will require close public - private cooperation, because snowmobiles cover
long distances , hence , public and private lands must be packaged to provide
continuous safe trails .

At the same time resources and privacy must be insured.

The snowmobile has trend overtones, of a major outdoor sport.
are conflicts between snowmobiles and other County sports.

However, there

Therefore, County-

w i de efforts will become necessary to designate snowmobile trails, perhaps
following the early overland trails of Indians , exploit'ers and missionaries.

Some

areas and trails should be restricted so that snowshoeing, cross country skiing
and wildlife habitates are not subjected to the disturbance of motorized vehicles.
Old logging roads , pipeline right - of- ways , abondoned railroad grades, and
seasonal County roads represent resources £or snowmobile trails.

The vacation home is an important economic £actor in tourism-recreation .

Be-

cause Emmet County has vast areas of land oriented to water resources, the
vacation home is and will continue to represent an increasingly important element of local recreation - both £or working and retirement families .

A Bureau

of Outdoor Recreation Study for the Northern New England States revealed that
v acation homes averaged $10 , 659 in that area , ranging from a value of $2, 100
to over $18 , 000 .

1

In addition, the vacation home family spends about $1, 900

Mr . Kenneth Dorman , Manager , Upper Michi gan Touri st Association, Iron
Mo unta in , Michi gan . SOURCE : Iron M o untain News , January 12, 1970.

- 17-

�,t

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

annually in the community for household goods , taxes , maintenance, and local
1
travel . While Emmet County may not be New England, the gravity of metropolitan growth in Michigan plus the stature of ski resort and lake attractions,
make the areas comparable .

tory is for seasonal homes , with higher proportions in individual townships.

A major concern with the recreation home is that itbe developed into the lands c ape and des i gned so as to minimize the visual depletion of scenic resources.
Clu ster development concepts will promote this obj ective because it allows dev elopment on a more compact scale with more open space.- around and between
clusters .

I
I

Community utility services also are more feasible by this design

approach .

BROAD SCALE RESOURCE INTERPRETATIONS
The bas i s for much of the County's Recreation Plan is formulated from a review
of existing conditions ,

The Plan takes into consideration :

Regional setting
Existing resource areas (broad scale resource characteristics, potentially
developa ble or not, etc).

I
I
I
I
I

Roughly one-third of the County's housing inven-

Topography
Forests
Marshland
Riv ers , streams and flood plains
Shorelines
Farmlands
Wildlife

1

Department of Interior , Bureau of Outdoor R e creati on, Northern New England
V a c at i on Home Study, 19 6 6 .

-18 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Exi sting recreational facilities
County residents
Tourists

Needs and limitations

The following secti on discusses the resource elements embodied m the Recreation
Plan .

Resource Inventory
The resource inventory 1s an essential step in recreation planning.
likened to a stock investor's working capital.
in part , based upon his present assets .

It may be

That is, his future investment is,

"It is easy to talk about environments in

generalities , but the task of protecting and enhancing the remaining attributes
that provide diversity, requires in the first place, the task of identifying, evaluating and locating the attributes in the real , living landscape.

Without under-

standing where they are, wq.ose back-forty or urban block they are in, the nature
of the owner , in what county, state or nation they are located, etc., little can be
accompl i shed in creating new design criteria for their enhancement, nor implementation tools for their protection." 1

Two i mportant sources of resource information in Emmet County are the U.S.

I
I
I
I
I

I

Soil Conser v ation Service and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources.
These agencies can provide valuable data and management guidance on soils,
wildlife , fish , rivers and streams , forests and related resources .

Because of

t i me limitations and the scope of this study, the resource inventory as included
in th i s report , is primarily comprised of available basic data supplemented by
a vi s u al reconnaissan c e .

More pre c ise basic data would strengthen the in -

v e ntor y and permit a more factual analysis .

A c tual on site soil investigations

are prerequisi tes f o r every well conceived recreational use, whether for wildlife
management or facility construction .

1 Professor Phillip H . Lewi s, Jr ., Upper Mississippi River Comprehensive Basin
Study, U . S . Department of Inter i or, Nati onal Park Service, 1968 .
- 19-

�..

• •••••••
C £ CI

L

-~
ST(IRGEON

8 A Y

~

'lt,

t

'

(,

~

II

I
I ---,, --

'"; ;
~ li ========i_J[
. j ·I"'r-:7rf"""
!
rl
L
__ l ,
:

---,,----:I ~.

'

C
--1

I

"

IUI

D

"·---'

.JI.

• I

[JI
' [~J.fi ··~-..
I
\

f',,

r-rJ~. \\:
•

----\f ______~

..

-i

. Jr::::\_,. I' ~~ :
• =. ~ I . 1. \ :

"

'

.i

•·--

:!

"-··

i~~---·

I

•

······ ;;:f"osa'·,f-;·-p···

~~~
:\
I
II

.

•

"

~

'

"

yCL .
~

!~
.I

'\ I

I

1

1•jl

..

1:
_..J~
~:::,.=&gt;====" I

~'i. '1o•.•· - "-

i "" "-· .~..

II

~

... ..

- l.. J---,~-·-,;-----~
.. ;i

•

\ ..

l

'

,. - - - - i_

"'
Sc

"
l

I T Tl

£

TRAVERS£

8

A Y

,_,_,._ PRINCIPAL
DEER

DRAINAGE

BASINS

YARDING AREAS

TO P QUALITY
SECOND

TROUT STREAMS

QUALITY

TROUT

a

TRIBUTARIES

STRE AMS

8

TRIBUTARIES

TOP 8 SECOND QUALITY WARM WATER GAME FISH STREAMS

+

_____
......
--·.....______
,.-. ...............
..._
. _..... .... __

...

.... _ , .... , _ ... -

HI - •

,
-·. -............._,.,.,_,.
.,_,..,_,.
,

,.,.,

0
8

_"

.....

vilicon · lemon a assoc. Inc
plonninQ
consultonh

CANOEA BLE

STREAMS

" ,_., ,

. .. _

WITH

LIGHT

RIVERS

DEVELOPMENT

TO HEAVY

DEVELOPMENT

I 12 011 MOR£ D£\IELOPM£JH!I

S E L E C CTQEU D
R E S Q LJ R C E
NT Y

EMMET

STREAMS

t 2 TO II DEVELOf'M[NTS PER MILE I
MEOJUM

~~~t.1:,r,:IY~~,~~;~(\•.T

I

8

DEVELOPMENT

o,

PEIi MILE)

IUTUIIAl

IIUOUl(U , UYlOlltl Ott

INVENTORY

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Resource Characteristics
Some of the landscape characteristics that influence the recreational potentials
of Emmet County are listed below.

These should be viewed as standards to

guide the actual development of recreational attractions.

Historical Characteristics and objects.

Significant in association with past cultures

They stimulate one's imagination as well as remind us of our

pa st heritage.

Relief Characteristics -

Monotony must not prevail.

Whether moving from

city to countryside, forest to farmland, or hill to plains, the transition
should not be filled with clutter but rather delineated by contrast.

Aesthetic Characteristics -

Beauty is sought in many respects whether

scenic vistas, streams, water bodies, yegetation, topography, wildlife or
man ma.de developments.

Scientific and Educational Characteristics -

Features that have far-reaching

value with regard to the evolution of civilizations, bogs, marshes,. and wildlife areas fall into this category as ecological factors.

Archaeological ex-

cavations, geologic formations, and fossil remains must also be included.

Protective Characteristics -

Methods to obtain relief from sun, wind , snow

and rain are sought by man and wildlife.

Shelter belts, forest plantations

and ridges are among those features that make up this resource characteri-stic.

Sentimental Characteristics aside from beauty.

Landmarks and symbols of local significance

Popular affection is a strong factor in perpetuation and

maintenance of many natural and man-made features.

A wood lot, historic

building, scenic overlook, or unusual sign may fall into this category.

- 20-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I

-

BROAD SCALE RESOURCES OF EMMET COUNTY

Water
Water is an integral feature in the recreation economy of any area.

Emmet

County not only has 71 miles of Lake Michigan frontage, but also has a wide
selection of rivers, streams and inland lakes.
of surface water in the County.

There are some 10,400 acres

Lake Michigan frontage is important as a factor

in regional tourist drawing power.

Therefore, development along the lake should

be designed to permit observation, public access and retention of its highly
aesthetic image.

Evening sunsets· over Lake Michigan are a particularly scenic

natural phenomena
attraction forces.

Inland la:kes, rivers and streams are secondary regional
However, the nearness of metropolitan centers has given

some inland lake areas prir'nary,attraction fore es ( e. g., Walloon Lake).

Whether for wildlife management purposes or for outdoor recreation activities,
all of the County's water resources must be protected from pollution to retain
its purity and natural environmental image.

Fish and Wildlife
Fish and wildlife resources are fafrly aboundant in Emmet County.

As a recre-

ational activity, -as sanctuary or preserve, as a business or aesthetic setting,
the fish and wildlife are an integral part of Emmet County's environment.

Hence,

wildlife management practices have a direct bearing on tourism recreation and
the tourist economy.

To be most effective, wildlife management practice must be extended to involve
the vast acreages of private recreation land.
the following species:

The wildlife of the County include

white tailed deer, elk, fox, rabbit, grouse, woodcock,

squirrel and waterfowl.

Black bear also inhabit areas of the County.

major fish species · include: Trout, (brown, brook, rainbow and lake),
Salmon, Bass, Bluegills, Perch, Pike, and others.
-21-

Some
Coho

�I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I

Government Land
An important recreation resource in any region are state and federal lands.
Although private forest-farm lands fulfill open space and recreation needs, they
are not as permanent as public owned land.

Private lands may move into or out

of recreational use in terms of the economic needs of the moment.

G o vernment

lands, therefore, can be regarded as permanent features of outdoor recreation
and they are more likely to come under Comprehensive Resource Management.

About 100 square miles of land in Emmet County is state owned .

This is roughly

20 percent of the County's land area, and exceeds all local acreage standards for
recreation land needs .

However, the area I s recreation market includes metro-

pol i tan centers in the Midwestern states and Canada, hence, comparisons with
numbers of County residents is distorting .

Topography
The analysis of the County's physiography is limited in respect to detail.

U.S. G. S.

data on a County-wide scale at the 20 foot intervals is effective as a general reference for slope data but cannot illustrate the variety of slope change that can occur
within a given 20 foot interval.

Topography in Emmet County cannot be described in simple terms, since there
is relief variety and contrasts in each of the sixteen ( 16) 'townships.

H o wever,

the predominant steeper slopes may be found in the centra l portions of the County
and in the southeast.

The east and north areas are generally flat, while the

entire west side has slopes ranging £:vom gently rolling to rolling.

Again, m-

stances of different slopes may be found in most regions of the County .

-22-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

Land
Being the northermost County in the Lower Peninsula, Emmet County has a
relatively open character, interesting land forms,
square miles of government land.

scenic woodlands, and many

These combine to establish a "land resource"

that is coming under increasing pressures for recreation - resort development.
As the intensity and density of development increases, the open space character
will diminsh as will the broad scale resources that make the County attractive.
W o od lots will be cleared for building purposes, hills leveled and acreages subdivided into smaller and smaller units .

It also means hunting pres sure, sanitary

and refuse disposal problems, and ecological imbalance conditions.

By and

large the land resource must be protected with zoning, us es encouraged to adopt
progressive development concepts , and community efforts made to place critical
scenic and wildlife resources in public or protective ownership.

The two maps which accompany this section of the County Recreation Plan, inventory the important resource and recreation features of the County.

The map

"Selected Resource Inventory 11 illustrates basic County resources which adapt
to broad scale recreation uses and include deer yard areas, trout streams,
canoeable waters and basic dra i nage patterns.
proposed for broad scale

The map

11

These can be regarded as areas

resource and game management.

Selected Scenic and Recreation Resources 11 inventories specific recre -

ation facilities and areas with potential for recreation development.

Public lands,

state forests , public access sites, local parks and playgrounds are mapped.
addition , special or unique recreation pbtentials are listed.

In

These include such

f e atures as potential impoundment sites, historic interest areas, scenic view
1
areas , and related features with recreation - tourism significance .
lField inventory work was supplemented by preliminary data from the draft report
by the U . S. Soil Conservation Service , An Appraisal of Potentials for Outdoor
Recreational Development, Emmet County, Michigan . Also, the report by : Northwest Michigan Resource Conser v ation and Development Project Steering Committee,
Project Plan, dated 1969, prepared by the U . S. Soil Conservation Service.

- 23 -

�eil

MACK I NAW BRIDGE

HISTORIC FORT

]MI CH ILI MACK INAC

C E CI L

rL~~~'i~~ l
PROJECTS

T.JtN.

STURGEO N

8 A Y

~~ ~t:=~ff--

SAND DUNES&amp;
BEACH RESOURCE

,___JL:

~

I."¥ . . ,
. .~
F"
,.:, ~,ll&lt;'c/J
·
.J:

-,.,_

(I)

•-77 · .-,u---'' •l -

'
·

'

"

ll"Nir-+"SN,, ··
II

II•

~I

II

"

~

i

..11

1

N

•IJLJ
.. ·
.

•

~..,:i

•1j's7'J

.

~

7

'i---:

I

J

;-

,".

u

I

c

"""..

\'~

.

..

·
'...

'--

t,,'"',y..:i&gt;=-.
",,,
(,_,,,,;,iv
..J

•

""

u,"'

'

I

[===+i'
" I-

••

'

.

~~

~-

-

''\ \ "---'--'-'

•

~.~-------

·&lt;•"

~

:~

=7f~~~U~ _J

rec, :c)
"'o
-

·

.77

"'1

•

ts,

•

T 57N

I

L

,

' ••• ..

I

-··

'

~-•
;;::, ;'•..,•l" ·
~- . ,0 v&lt;':Ci
..• .

,.,:i~.)';'~
·4
.
.
'

-~: oJ)&lt;-;.l..

~~~v~
r...
~ I'"- .
Q~tJ~ ✓,

F-~11,I ~1:;,~ • " •'~
tA .,.--£1) ,'l!H I

"rt

I ,~:") '4:
",, ~-t"E.
.• ---

,,

Jt

r
l.

\

1

; \

~~

'v•.

.

-•

,, ,

I(.)',;)~

..

,

· , , ;:,l''if---'";s&lt;'c'.J,,[.i"'.'c"c~
·• ~•',,,-f"•J
C"o~•.'{;~',;\
~•JO·•.di~.•••~
C
,•
' ""'·'
1

IJ

,

=•

,,,-;;; J

k:I
0

..

•-

•;•7

F,-?~l · ··'
(;'1·
l.:&gt;s"
, L:'.:il)'•
')0.. ~ - _J;
I
'
' •C
C:.c-J

I -"
-;!?j ,

·J&gt;'.l)•:!&gt;
· •"'-

•
~-,;~(;"

~

;

I

-t-

~
IL..,..,·J1LJI

u

,~~~ cu : ~J2&lt;;

'

□···~-~-~ _

"~~;·{;6:u~•'J).
II

'

.........,

7n

r-,,,

II

II

I

_J~

'•

11

-

,•,j

•o

I

~L

5~c"'&lt;-,&lt;::~-

~

~2:J,.' · ~ . !'
~ ~

I

I[__ !

·;~I

..

•.

()

"

,I

'1@c\),•

rs 71 s

\

~

~

'v

"

i.

.,

~ ---f'~0~~0,;;""'~~~~
: o,·,···
r •

I

·"'''- ,.r

·p

~(;v'

..

L

,

slJy;:_ ,-

'&lt;'

~

.

:

.. If~~ ~

"

□

"tJ:_b
' ·.1l .....•

B

'?-

U.ol M. FOREST
H!~foR.fH

.,,,,~

.

. , • .'&lt;C
N

P -- r·-

I\ •

=&gt;=--'

11

;) ,:'
· " n i,,,

II

..

._,-~ul ;

-,--

A

I

__J~ I

•

l JL_J,I •JI-

R

/o•
\

-;,
!'

l

•

J

1 11 V

I

"

~-

r---,

LJ

~

E

,'l

,~,

::
l{J-~;----

..

1/

E-.
_J

_"___ _, 'INLAND

--

-t- ,_J;;t

fu•'

.

,

l

7

,;►i'-.&gt;cc:.~ .ll
·J~J:.~~~-j
'ti

L

WATER

..!!.Q.J!.TE
rC~R~O~O~K~E~D~

~:l[~---J~ •
-~ITT!
,,,. ""'"'"'
-·~LJl ::~gm\

I~"

l
:

T. .MN

RP';

~h~.-.r ~--

\.- ,=-..o

"""'-

1'\/J 111

...

• I

i'LJ
:

• •,1

-

---

11

p

'~·;,_"~~ r-.:-=--

'

---,

~I. -,l~ ._jLJ

,-,,

,. " r
L]'' .--~ :~"f
. /...
,\~~:II
I..\L... I
'

...,. ~

J4

j-j.I,...~

.) ~. ~.,~~,,)

~
-

1,h=:-'&gt;~

~~'°'!,:

t C'

, •

.

.

JJ

[_

RIVER

H

LOCKS

&lt;.q;_ ') ~v I""_~

....

G

""

~~~!T

,,:

T 35N

.
I

-.J

i

.di

I

I

~

.

I
I

t
I

C

~NRTUEST

nc=.=-:)W ._;

~-=·J:

~:in

..LJ . .J~~1,-~ ~, . L~. _Tl E I
slo jw
.

jr::r

R

•

"1r.----G:_].
,r 8 ,

i

••

T

.......

~, . ,
.
··'

•

J~[l□

· 1·

. ..

~

11

·

~

/4;:,. ,

l .•

~~

..

I

;

H

1
_
r.lC.,v--J,c ~LE~E!~
'

L

J.~~

~
I
I
I

'-~

1 .d

,· V

•

.

.

e." -

. ,
,o

I

~

::,, 0

&lt;&gt;6

&gt;': ,,.J

I . ,,,t:;·
:-

T 54N.

.

i

h·L.· !

1/ ~

~

'

-

I

- ·fl

~ L--1--rLJ~, .~~~r:r:J·

R. 6W.

"

~v

!I

~
HARLEVOIX

~

"itti~(E__-

I j:

~~·Ji,
1rf:•?J

\~\

,/''

0

...

-,:;

..

,-+

.

·

,. ,,

1,

-~\l_

.

•

'\1(1

j

"
'
·
DD
-. 0 jd~~
rr·
J:\ .

i~~~l.~:

I. \L. l. ~
-. \ ~.3
~~~l46JL
II

AR

~

••

LJC~~ ' -

-j1 . ' ""'

. JL_

~... IJL:_J\ .·JH

HISTORIC II
GEOLOGIC

~

1 ~~ O"; ,1,
4'""'

i

"'

...

* ~;-'Jt\.~I
0

"

RECREATION LA NO RESOURCES

CJ

PUBLIC LAN OS (COUNTY, MUNiCiPAllTY, II SCHOOL)

~

STATE FOR EST

*

- TIil Pl0AIArl0N

o,

1KIS C-,VMIC

..

~

•

W_.S f!NANCIAUY

AIDlO THI O UGH A FIOU_.,l GIANI ,_0,._ !Hf 00,UHtUll
t&lt;O'JIIHG ANO un... N OfVHO,NfHT. UNDU !Hf UI•
UN ,lANNUtG AUllUNU ,1oou-. AUI HOIIUO n
llC TIOH 701 o, Tt&lt;f "OUSIHGACT Of lf&gt;• , A) 1'""lHOlD
AO/IIINlllfUO IY THl #l CIUGAN 01, .... ,,.,tH Of cO ... M!UL~

o,

u

SOOD

IOOO

IOOCI

""' .. ....

vilican . ieman a assoc. inc.
planning
ca n1ullanll

PUBLIC ACCESS SITES II ROADSIDE PARKS
PARKS II PLAYGROU NDS (SCHOO L SiTES - 5 )
SCENIC ViEW RESOURCES
MAJOR PRIVATE II SEMi·PRIVATE RECREATION

S e Ie c t e d

Is C E N I C a RECREATION
EMMET

COUNT y

RESOURCES

11

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

-

The recreation features on the scenic and recreation resource map should also
be regarded as proposed recreation developments, subject to feasibility analysis
and implementation.

-24 -

�COUNTY

RECREATION ANALYSIS
Local Dimension

�I
I
I
I

LOCAL

The Comprehensive Recreation Plan -for Emmet County must also consider local
demands for recreational facilities.

While it is true that broad scale recreational

resources are critical elements of tourism-recreation, local community environment, and economic development, measures of local service needs are also

I

presented.

I
I
I
I

CONCEPTS AND STANDARDS

I

RECREATION DIMENSIONS

Specific types of recreational facilities in a community may vary appreciably from
facilities found in another.

Population numbers, resources, tourist demands,

philanthropic bequests, advance planning, and citizen attitudes all bear on the
quality of a given park and recreation system.

Even though there are differences

in recreation systems, there are some basic facilities which serve all communities.

These include:

Home Yard
Assured through zoning, the home yard is an important recreational facility for

I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

the pre- school aged child.

It also accommodates outdoor family activities.

Yard sizes vary.

Tot Lots
In high density residential areas and mobile home courts, tot lots usually contain
space for games, limited apparatus, a sand box and benches for supervisory
adults.

Size varies with available space.

Playgrounds
Usually adjacent to the elementary school, playgrounds serve elementary school
age children and may contain:

Playground apparatus, a shelter area and rest

rooms, open space for active play, paved areas and perhaps a tot lot area.
2 to 5 acres, plus 1 acre per 100 pupils.

Size:

A minimum of 3. 5 acres when a school

is included.

- 25-

�I
I
I
I
I

Neighborhood Parks
Neighborhood parks are intended to serve residential areas in a community.

They

are often combined with playground sites and are an excellent means for preserving natural features in subdivision areas.

These facilities are characteristically

quiet and emphasize landscaping, walkways, open lawns and scenic beauty.

Size:

one acre per 1, 000 population.

I

The accompanying illustration portrays the heighborhood -·schbol-park . conc~pt.

I

Playfields
Oriented toward the recreational needs of high school age and adult age citizens,

I

I
I

playfields are developed to meet the active recreational demands of the community.
Ball diamonds, athletic fields and recreation buildtngs are typical playfield uses.
Often these facilities are located in conjunction with a high school.

Community Parks

less space for other required facilities.

I

Regional Parks

I
I

'
~

10 acres

minimum, plus 1 acre per 100 pupils.

I
I
I
I

Size:

Intended to serve all community groups, especially the family, community parks
offer diverse recreational facilities and strive to preserve or enhance outstanding
natural features.

Typical. facilities may include swimming, picnicking, scenic

views, landscaping and similar attractions.

Size:

1 acre per 100 population,

Regional parks serve persons from a wide geographic area and may be developed
to include some community park functions, but usually emphasize resources and
conservation.

State, national and county parks typify regional parks which pre-

serve nature, offer camping, have outstanding scenic views, and/ or afford
hunting, fishing, winter sports, etc.

Size varies by type of facility, sponsor,

regional demands for park space, and the nature of the facility.

- 26-

�......................... ______ _
,.__....__ P A R K - - - - - - - - -

PARK

B~:~·p-~~
FIELD SPORTS AREA

GREEN AREA
FAMILY AREA
PICNIC A ~
QU IET RE
10

BASEBALL
BASKETBALL
VOLLEY BALL
TENNIS

u

0

rz II IT11 IJ 11

uuSCHOOL

NEIGHBORHOOD SCHOOL-PARK CONCEPT

I

vilican-leman
planning

a

assoc. inc.
consultants

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

COUNTY POPULATION CHARACTERISTICS
Emmet County had a total population of 15, 904 per sons in 19 60.
to increase to about 18,000 persons in 1970.

This is estimated

By 1990, the total County may have

22, 500 citizens depending on the success in attracting additional jobs in industry,
retailing, and tourism recreation.

Because of tourism recreation the County

Recreation Plan assumes importance beyond that of providing local recreation
services and facilities.

In 1959, the median family income in Emmet County was reported to be $4, 694.
This compares with a Michigan average of $6, 256, which was 33. 2 percent higher
than the County median.

Although ten years out of date, it is reasonable to con-

clude that an income gap still exists between the state average income and the
County average.

The income of tourists and families who visit the County for

recreation purposes is probably well above the County average.

The population density of Emmet County varies significantly from one area to
another.

For each resident, there are 16. 2 acres of land in the County,

How-

ever, in certain village and city locations (selected blocks) the density equals any
typical Midwestern . community.

The overall density question is distorted some by

the influx of large numbers of summer-winter tourists who compete with local
residents for land resources.

The age group structure of the County indicates some imbalance with general
state trends.

Significant differences include :

(a) higher proportion of ;persons

over 64 years of age ; (b) slightly higher proportion of persons in the mature
family group (ages 45 to 64); (c) a low proportion of young and middle aged
families (ages 25 to 44); (d) slightly more persons in the school age group; and
(e) fewer pre-school children.

For the pµrpose of long-range planning, the recre-

ation service must consider all population groups regardless of the community
age profile in any given year.

Individual projects, however, may emphasize ser-

vice to a given age group, depending upon available financing, citizen desires,
and/or basic lack of facilities for that age group.
-27-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

I

I
I
I
I
I

INVENTORY AND DEMAND
A general measure of recreation need 1s the standard figure of 1 acre per 100
population.

If this formula is employed in Emmet County, there would be a

recreation land need for 180 acres of community-neighborhood park land.

This

would increase to perhaps 225 acres by 1990.

There are 405 . 0 acres of local park and school recreation land in Emmet County.
All of this land is owned by local governmental units in the County as there are
no County owned parks .

In addition, there are 7, 273. 1 acres of land in major

regional parks (e . g. Wilderness State Park), roadside parks, public access sites
and related recreation resources.

State lands, largely in the Wilderness State

Forest contain some 90 square miles of land .

It is noted that the existing local

park acreage is the estimated area of use and not necessarily the total land owned
by the community.

There are another 2, 755. 7 acres of recreation land in

private and semi - private ownership, plus private cottages, ski chalets, recreation farms, and hunting acreage.

The population- acreage ratios readily point up the inadequacy of attempts to
apply a ratio standard to ascertain basic facility needs.
tials are immense ;

Open space park poten-

hence, the local recreation need will largely relate &lt;--l d 'i.m-

proved parks, expanded parks and structural facilities for recreation.

However,

added local park purchases or acquisitions should be encouraged as a means '. to
preserve natural resources and potential recreation sites that might otherwise
be lost.

For the purpose of recreation planning and the County-wide Land Use

Inventory, the park acreages listed on 'TABLE : 2,
Inventory'' apply .

- 28-

, "Public Recreation Land

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I

TABLE
PUBLIC RECREATION

2
LAND INVENTORY

Emmet County

Communities
1.

2.

Bear Creek
Township

Bliss
Township

Recreation
Feature

Recreation Acreage by Ty:ee
Local
Regional
Total

Senior High School
29.0
Rotary Park
Roadside Park (US 131)
Bay View Parks
Petoskey State Park
Round Lake Public Access---

2. 9
3. 5
16. 6
273.0
2. 0

29.0

298.0

Wilderness State Park
Township Park

6,925.0
34.7
34. 7

3.

Carp Lake
Township

Public Access Paradise
Lake
Lincoln Park
2 Roadside Parks

Center
Township

Larks Lake Public
Access
Youth Center
Ballfield (Larks Lake)

Cross Village
Township

Boat Ramp on Lake
Michigan
Wy Camp Lake Public
Access
Cross Village Park
(Historical)
Cross Village School

2.0
2. 2

53.3

5. 0
.5
5.5
5.0

11. 0

2.0
2. 0
. 2
1.0
1.0

-29-

6,959.7

.2

6.0
5.

6,925.0

51. 1
51. 1

4.

327.0

4.2

5.2

�TABLE 2 Continued

[

I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Local
6.

Friendship
Township

Roadwide Park

Regional
1.0
1.0

7.

Little Traverse
Township

Conway Beach
Conway Ballfield

Littlefield
Township and
Alanson

Alanson School
Playground near School
Alanson Ballfield
Alanson Roadside Park
and Tennis Court
Alanson Public Fishing
Oden Roadside Park
Oden Lake Access
Oden Park
Oden Ballfield
Pickerel Lake Public
Access-

ship, Pellston
(pt. ) ' Brutus and
Levering

Pellston High School
Pellston Auditorium
Public Access on River
Pellston Elementary
School

2.5
.5

.p
.3
.1
4.0
2. 0

Pellston Field
Perhton Tennis Courts
Roadside Park

11 . Pleasantview
Township

None

23.6

2. 0
4.0
2. 0

8. 5

1. 0
1. 0

7.3

6.0
.3
6.3

-30-

3.4

2. 1
.4

6.5
10 . Maple River
Township ,
Pellston (pt.),
and Van

2.5

7. 0
2. 5
4. 1

20.2

9. McKinley Town-

1. 0

.5
2. 0
2. 5

8.

Total

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

TABLE

2 Continued

Local
12 . Readmond
Township

Lake Michigan Park
Historic Park (Council
Tree)
Roadside Park

1.5
.5
2.0

1.0
3.0
4.0

Wawatam
Township

14.0

1.0
4.0

Pickeral Lake Access
2 - Public Access

5.0
15.

12.0

10.0

10. 0
14. Springvale
Township

Total

10.0

10.0
13. Resort Township Resort School
Waloon Lake Access
Roadside Park - US-31

Regional

Cecil Bay Park
2.5
(Mackinaw City)
High School
17.7
Michilimackinac Park
Cecil Bay Public Access
(State)
French Farm Lake Public
Access

5.0

15. 3

3.0
2. 0

20.2

20.3

40.5

Total Townships and Villages
Total City of Petoskey
Total Harbor Springs

197.5
147.4
60. 1

7, 273 . 1

7,470.6
147.4
60. 1

Grand Totals

405.0

7, 273. 1

7, 678. 1

16. West Traverse
Township

None

SOURCE:
Vilican - Leman &amp; Associates, Inc. Land Use Inventory, Emmet County, Summer
1968, and aerial photographs.

-31-

�LOCAL RECREATION PLAN
Statistically, there is a sizeable local park surplus in Emmet County, both under
current population levels and foreseeable projections through 1990.

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

statistical needs are not equally divided among the local units of government.
Hence , the conclusions drawn from TABLE 3 should be related to individual communities rather than from column totals .

The TABLE 3 "Local Recreation Needs" , shows that the local recreation surplus
i s mainly the result of large acreages in Bear Creek, Bliss and Carp Lake Townships .

The Cities of Petoskey and Harbor Springs also reflect large surplus

acreages .

Between 1970 and 1990, local park needs will be felt in the Townships

of Cross Village , Friendship, Maple River, Pleasantview, Resort, Springvale and
West Traverse .

Following is an outline of local recreation developments that may be pursued.
The locations of specific features are presented on the County recreation plan
map titled ''Proposed Recreation Features.

11

There are two predominant recreation development recommendations that apply
to all communities within the County, as well as the County.

1.

These are:

Develop parks, improve parks and provide recreation services to satisfy
the needs of all age groups.

2.

Acquire , promote, and/or assist in the reservation and preservation of
outstanding natural resources that exist in the County.

These involve

scarce waterfront lands , scenic timber stands, unique topography, wildlife habitat areas and the like .

- 32 -

f

However, the

�- TABLE

._.

._._.

- -

3

LOCAL RECREATION NEEDS
Emmet County
Community or Local
Recreation Acreage Needs
Community_
1.

I

w
w
I

2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12 .
13 .
14 .
15 .
16 .

Existing Acreage

Bear Cre·ek Township
Bliss Township
Carp Lake Township
C e nter Township
Cros.s Village T ownship
Friendshi p Tow nship
Little Traverse Township
Littlefield Township &amp; Alanson
McKinley Township &amp; Pellston (pt)
Maple River Township &amp; Pellston (pt)
Pleasantview Township
R e admond Township
R e s o rt Township
Springvale T ownship
Waw atam and Mackinaw City (pt)
West Traverse Township
Sub Totals

17.
18 .

City of Petoskey
City o f Harbor Spr i ngs
Totals

1

29. 0 acres
34.7
51. l

6. 0
1.0

2.5
20.2
6.5
6.3
10.0
10 . 0
20 . 2

197 . 5 acres
147 . 4
60 . 1
405. 0 acres

1990 Need 1

1990

Surplus(+)
Deficit(-)

50. 5 acres
2. 5
5.8
1.0
1.4
3. 2
7. 7
10. 4
8.4
3. 4
2. 0
2. 5
23 . 8
5. 7
4. 5
4.0

- 21. 5 acres
+ 32 . 2
+ 45.3
+ 5. 0
.4
- 3. 2
+ 5. 2
+ 9. 8
- 1.9
+ 2. 9
- 2. 0
+ 7. 5
- 13.8
- 5. 7
+ 15.7
- 4. 0

136.8acres

+ 71. 1 acres

75. 2
17. 5
229. 5 a c .1· e s

+ 72 . 2
+ 42.6
+ 185 . 9 acres

T o wnshi ps w ith a proje c t e d p o pulat i on decline show a 1990 need based upon th e 19 6 0 populat ion .

�Bear Creek Townshlp - Project-ions show a mlnlmum need for 21 . 5 acres of local
recreat l on land by 1990 .

Th-is is a local need that should be provlded for general

Townshl p recreatlon purposes and does not relate to nelghborhood needs dlscussed

I

-in the Petoskey Area Plan .

Some development objectives that should be pursued

are :

I
I
I

1.

A cqulre the federally owned radar stat-ion property in Sect-ion 23 for
recreation and general community use. Th-is fadlity is in an excellent
recreation resource area .

2.

Encourage the development of hlstorical and cultural features, that
characterlze the area, and speclfically the proposed Indian Museum and
Indian Cultural Center near the Petoskey State Park .

3.

Work with the state agendes and adjacent communitles to promote canoeing
o n the Bear River . A potential impoundment of the Bear River would also
create opportunitles £or township park development.

4.

It appears that the Townshlp could use some community ballfields, outdoor
skating rinks and related community recreation features . The only local
recreation feature i s the high school, and this serves more than the Township area .

5.

Some suggested locatl ons for specific active community recreation features
are :
Near the Townsh ip Hall
As a buffer between resldentlal lands and the buslnes s us es on
Mitchell Road at Divi s -ion
On Pickerel Lake Road at a trans-it-ion po i nt with the proposed freeway,
proposed industrial area , and/or trailer housing areas .
With planned school locations

I
I
I
I

On the s i tes of larger community and reg i onal parks

- 34 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I

Locations to consider for general community parks, that may or may not
have active sport features include :
In the Bear River Valley area
On Round Lake to preserve open space
Among scenic wood lots, forested -ar,eas and rolling hills in the
community - as at the radar site
On hillsides or sites offering outstanding panoramic views such as
from US-131 south of Petoskey and from Pickerel Lake Road
Bliss Township -

Statistically Bliss Township will have a substantial local park

surplus by 1990, as projections indicate that the permanent population will remain
stable or decline somewhat.

The 30 acre park on Lake Michigan provides ample

recreation space according to standards, however, some recreation projects may
include the following :

1.

Encourage the state to expand W_i..lderness State Park southward to include
the sand dune areas along the Lake Michigan beach. This scenic, sandwooded area is unsuited to small lot subdividing because of the erosion
hazards from the sand dunes. It is also a valuable area-wide natural resource and tourist attraction. There are some 2 miles of beach that should
go into regional park ownership, be it federal, state, county or township.
Cottages could be developed in planned clusters off of the immediate beach
area.
From 2 to 10 acres of land should be provided for local recreation use
(ballfields, skating, sledding, etc . ) . This should be in a central location,
perhaps in the vicinity of the Township Hall or in Bliss Center .

3.

Consider other recreational facilities oriented toward Wy Camp Lake,
e x isting publicly owned lands (state or county) and scenic topographic
features .

-35-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

Carp Lake Township - This community has a relatively low total population, but
receives large numbers of tourists in the summer months.

tour i st attraction, has a large number of private and tourist accommodations.
Some recreational projects may include :

1.

Retain the 50 acre Lincoln Park site on Paradise Lake in public ownership ,
and add recreation facilities in the nature of a general community park.
Minimize tree cutting to retain its natural character and improve access
roads into the site .

2.

Protect the scenic recreation and resource potentials of Carp River.
is a valuable canoe water and fishing stream.

3.

Poor soils on the south shore of Paradise Lake (Sec. 23) suggest that residential - cottage development be avoided so as to control sanitary pollution
to the lake and shorelands . This area should be used £or wildlife management purposes , as well as to retain some open space image on a lake that
is now used very intensively. Public ownership or scenic easements are
two methods of retaining the open space character.

4.

Because there are no improved local recreation areas 1n the Township, it
would be desirable to develop some general recreation areas £or active
type sports. This may be done at Lincoln Park, although undesirable tree
cutting may be necessary, or space could be provided near the Township
Hall, which is in a more central location.

5.

A future park- recreation area may be established with·9- potential water 1mpoundment on Carp Creek .

Center Township possible declines.

I
I

Paradise Lake, a big

This

Center Township is sparsely populated, and projections show
I£ so there will be a 5. 0 acre park surplus by 1990.

1.

Ma i ntain and impro v e the community ballfield near Larks Lake. Other
active sports facilities may be developed at the Youth Center and/or
the Township Hall. More diversified recreation apparatus could also be
provided.

2.

I£ the Township i s able , acquire land on Larks Lake to preserve open space
and scenic resources for local residents , cottage owners and visitors. Enco u rage cluster cottage development concepts. Seasonal home markets will
accrue from access potentials to canoeable waters, ski resorts, and open
space areas.

- 36 -

�3.

Local and community recreation services may be provided at the Township
gravel pit , as a re - use of community resources.

4.

Protect the natural and scenic qualities of the Maple River. It is a canoeable
trout stream that should not be polluted, or over developed with vacation
homes .

Cross Village Township - Relating population to available or potential recreation
land at the Cross Village School , no significant added local recreation area is
indicated .

1.

Either at the school or on church property in the Village, recreation apparatus,
ice skating ponds and related active play facilities can be provided to meet
local demands,

2.

The outstanding scenic views of Lake Michigan suggest that efforts be made
to keep vistas from the highway open for scenic drive reasons. Scenic
easements and/or government owned land can meet this need.

3.

Cross Village has the potential to develop a marina and harbor on Lake
Michigan . A marina would be an excellent complementary facility to
the scenic beach.

4.

Either through state , county or township resources, the sandy beach area in
and near the Cross Village harbor area should be developed for recreation
purposes , emphasizing scenic and open space characteristics. Some facilities and recreation apparatus could still be established.

5.

Other recreation opportunities may relate to Wy Camp Lake and/or -future
re - use of the Township's sanitary fill area for recreation.

6.

Encourage the restoration, reconstruction or replica development of Cross
Village during the early Missionary - Indian Era (cir. 1700 - 1850) . This
could be a highly interesting focal point for tour i st visitation and would preserve a valuable cultural heritage .

Friendshi p Township -

The only public recreation area m Friendship Township

is a small roadside park near Middle Village .

As a minimum, standards suggest

a need for 3 . 0 acres of recreation area by 1990 .

- 37 -

�•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

•

1.

Work to acquire frontage on Lake Michigan for township park-recreation
purposes , as well as to acquire lands which are becoming increasingly
scarce, Public access to Lake Michigan should be reserved before the
frontage is lotted ofL

2.

Active sports recreation area for Township residents is being provided in
part by the Five Mile Creek Community Center, formed by a group of
citizens, General public recreation sites may be developed at the Township
Hall location, near Stutsmanville, or in the vi:cinity of the co1nmunity building,

3,

The Township owns 80 acres of land one mile south of the Township Hall.
This is an excellent potential recreation area. It is wooded, has gently
rolling topography, and is at the base of a very rugged topographic area,
that probably should be in broad scale recreation - open space use .

4.

Other recreation potentials may be developed among the numerous scenic,
topographic and wooded areas of the community .

Little Traverse Township -

Based upon the 1990 projected population Little

Traverse Township may need at least 5. 2 acres of added recreation area.

All

existing local recreation area is in Conway, and includes a small beach access
on Crooked Lake and a ball field along the railroad .

Residents and tourists in Little Traverse have access to recreational facilities
in Harbor Springs, Bear Creek Township and Petoskey.

The Township also

borders the private ski resorts in Pleasantview Township to the north .

Local recreation may include the following :

1.

Expand equipment and land near existing parks, and/or consider the development of a new community park for active play (5 to 10 acres).

2,

Attempt to acquire recreation land or access easements to Little Traverse
Bay , This will enhance local recreational opportunities and preserve
outstanding scenic resources .

-38 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

J

3.

A scenic community park can be developed in and near state owned lands
in the center of Section 11 off the Chadderdon Road. Rolling topography,
wooded areas and large open space can be adapted to a variety of recreation
services.

4.

Other recreation sites may be developed in conjunction with the Township
Hall or other community buildings that may be provided in future years .

5.

If the Township develops into an urban area, some small neighborhood parks
may be necessary to serve smaller areas.

Littlefield Township and Alanson -

Elementary school and playground facilities

in Alanson, and a ballfield north of Oden give the residents of Littlefield Township
a fairly good recreation inventory.

According to projections there will still be a

9. 8 acre park surplus by 1990 .

Some local recreation objectives may include :

1.

Continued improvements and expansions at the four local park-playground
facilities in Alanson. If the areas population increases substantially
beyond projected levels some additional neighborhood recreation sites may
be needed.

2.

Although there are several parks, the individual facilities are on comparatively small sites (except the school), ranging from. 1 to 4. 1 acres.
Hence , new recreation services may require additional la:rid areas.

3.

New recreation facilities may be expanded on one or both of the large
school land ownerships ( 120 acre tract and 68 acre tract). These would
provide ample acreage to meet foreseeable demands and both have a good
central location .

4.

As a means to protect floodplain areas and low lands near Crooked Lake,
Pickerel Lake and along the Crooked River, attempt to acquire scenic
easements and/or public ownership of the lands in question. This will
increase open space resources as well as act to reduce lak:e - river
pollution possibilities .

5.

The sanitary fill site north of Oden may prove satisfactory for recreation
usage after fill operations are completed.

J

J

- 39-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

6.

Encourage recreation developments in relationship with the Crooked River's
potential and use as an inland water route to Che9oygan.

7.

A special feature with tourist appeal is the State Fish Hatchery west of
Oden and the historical marker dedicated to the now extinct Passenger
Pigeon.

McKinley Township and Pellston (part) -

About half or more of Mckinley Town-

ship is in government owned l a nd, including state forests, University of Michigan
forest research lands, and the County Airport.

The Township also contains the

populated areas of Pellston Village, Brutus, and Levering.

All of the local recre-

ation acreage is associated with school buildings, including an auditorium facility
in Pellston.

By 1990, there will still be a statistical recreation land surplus of

3 . 1 acres.

1.

The Pellston High School, new Pellston Elementary School, and the Pellston
ballfield and tennis court provide a variety of existing recreation services
(ballfield and tennis courts are in the Maple River Township portion of
Pellston Village.) These recreation services are among the more diverse
available to non-city residents in the County. Facility improvements and
expansions should be promt:&gt;ted at each existing facility, because they are
in areas of local population concentration. Because the Leve ring School
has been closed, a small play area should be developed to serve this area
of the Township.

2.

The small communities of Van and Levering have no public recreation area.
However, a small park area for casual recreation use, ice skating~ etc.,
may be desirable to serve families in these areas.

3.

Broader scale recreation developments should include promotional efforts
to protect G-anoeable' waters and trout streams from pollution and over
development.

4.

A potential water impoundment exists on Van Creek and may be a good
source for establishing a general community recreation area.

5.

Promote the development of historical features, perhaps reconstructing
features of the old lumbertown in Pellston.

-40-

�::..---=--·-,-_

I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

Maple River Township and Brutus - Maple River Township has experienced past
population declines, but some stability or slight growth may prevail through 1990 .
If so , the community recreation inventory should be held to the existing acreage
and perhaps increased.

All existing local recreation sites are in Pellston Village

(ballfield and tennis courts), since the Brutus school was closed and sold.

1.

The Township Hall at Brutus is in good central location, and active recreation facilities may be satisfactorily provided at this location. This could
replace the recreation services of the former Brutus School.
Local recreation facilities may also be provided on Maple River Road
and/or Woodland Road,, as these are populated Township areas. There is
very little state owned land in the Township.
School district and county forest lands along the Maple River, and the Town~
ship ' s sanitary fill area are resources for possible recreation use and
development.
A broad scale recreation objective should be to protect the Maple River
from pollution and over development. This is a canoeable water and quality
trout stream o f importance to local residents and visitors . Most of the
r i ver courses through private lands, hence, zoning standards should be
established to offer some minimum protection to the resource . Similar
protection should include the Crooked River.

Pleasantview Township -

Some two-thirds of Pleasantview Township is rn state

forest and ma j or ski resort ownership .

Hence, the community supports a very

h i gh volume tourist population which includes skiers, hunters, fisherm:en, snowmobilers and motorists .

The demands on land resources are high and increasing

rapidly .

In contrast to the high tourist visitation, Pleasantview Township is one of the
smallest communities in the County , showing a statist i cal need for only 2 . 0 acres
of local recreation land by 1990.

At present , there are no official local public

parks .

- 41 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

L

In view of the population total and the vast areas of state forest land, there
may be no need for local park facilities during the planning periodo However,
some community recreation play area ought to be available and the minimum
2 o 0 acre need may be a reasonable goaL

2o

Future local recreation area may be provided at the Township Hall location;
this being a central geographi c locationo Local active play areas may also
be dev eloped at the Chalet Village communiti es near Nubs Nob and Boyne
Highlands.

3o

Broad scale recreation objectives relate to the protection of the Maple River
(q u ality trout water), su.·stenanc~· ; of deer yarding areas and other wildlife
habitats.

4.

The Harbor Springs School District owns lfi&gt;0 acres of land west of Boyne
Highlands . This tract borders the ski resort and state forest lands and
could provide recreational opportuni ties to Pleasantview, Little Traverse
and West Traverse Townships .

Readmond Township -

South of Cross Village, Readmond Township has frontage

o n Lake Michigan which has attracted numerous cottages along the shoreline.

A

.fa i r proportion of the Township is in state forest ownership.

Although there are many tourists who visit the community, the permanent popula ti on has declined in past years and only favorable conditions will prev,ent further
declines through 1990.

Readmond Township maintains one of the very few local parks on Lake Michigan,
outs i de of Petoskey and Harbor Springs.

Statistically the community will have

s u rpl u s local recreation acreage through 19900

L

Impro v e and add fa c ilities to the Lakefront Township Park. If possible,
attempt to keep the park in a natural character , emphasizing trails and
broad s c ale recreation uses . E x pand park frontage on Lake Michi gan
as £ea sible .

- 42 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

2.

Provide active type recreational uses at off- the - lake sites in the Township.
(Ballfields , skating areas , playgrounds, etc .) . Some locations may relate
to state owned land, private lands possibly bequeathed to the Township, or
by local citizen groups . A good central location would be with the Township
Hall .

3.

Promote broad scale recreat i on concepts in terms of game management,
shorel ine protection , and pollution control.

4,

Encourage the maintenance restoration and accessibility of cultural h i stor i cal features related to Indian populations and early missionary
act i vities .

Resort Township -

By 1990 , Resort Township may be the third mo st populous

c ommunity in the County and therefore will generate comparatively large demands
for recreational services.
acres by 1990 .

Stati stically, there may be a park land deficit of 13. 8

Existing recreation services are provided by the Resort Sc-hool and

larger parks in Petoskey,

Currently , there is only one small public access site

on Walloon Lake and none on Lake Michigan.

Resort Township Recreation Plan entails the following :

1.

For general Township recreation, the acreage requirements by 1990 may
be satisfied by expandi ng the school site. An active sports recreation area
may also be located with the fiTe station on Intertown Road.

2.

Long range neighbIDrhood recreation areas should be developed in terms
of the recommendations of the Petoskey Area Plan . Parks may be sited
with elementary schools , unless there are scenic natural features (woods,
waters , topograpp.y, etc.), in the neighborhood that should be reserved as
public open space.

3.

In an effort to broaden the recreational resources of the community, seek
to acquire park- recreation areas in one or all of the following locations :
On Little Traverse Bay, at the north end of Townline Road
On Walloon Lake , perhaps in the vicinity of the Manthei Veneer Mill

- 43 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

On the north end of Walloon Lake at the south extremity of Cemetery
Road
Enlargement of the public access site on Walloon Lake at ResortPike Road,
Other scenic Township areas with a potential for diversified outdoor
recreation , preferably to serve all seasons of the year.

4.

Protect the scenic image of the T o wnship and the broad scale resource
areas for wildlife management and large scale outdoor recreation of a
passive nature,

5.

A second potential recreation resource oriented to Little Traverse Bay
may involve future land re-claimed from quarrying activities by the
Penn-Dixie Corp , This is a long term future possibility.

Springvale Township -

This community is expected to have a slight to moderate

increase in population through 1990 ,

Major recreation resources include state

forest land, Pickerel Lake, and the Minnehaha River,

Currently, there are no

Township park facilities and there will be a statistical need for 5, 7 acres by
1990,

L

Local park and recreation area may be developed near Epsilon to achieve
a good central location, A facility on Ellsworth Road or east Pickerel
Lake Road would also be near populated areas.

2.

In order to enhance public access to broad scale recreation resources,
park and recreation areas should be provided on Pickerel Lake and/ or
Crooked Lake, Existing state public access sites on these lakes could
be enlarged,

3,

Protect the Minnehaha River from over de v elopment and pollution, Estab lish scenic corridors along the river to retain the natural scenic attractions
for canoeists and fishermen,

4,

Reserve some rolling topograhpic areas for local recreation - hiking,
sledding, etc , Some steeper slope areas may have ski resort potential.

- 44 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I

'

Wawatam Township and Mackinaw Village -

Modest population increases have

been projected for the Wawatam - Mackinaw community.

With existing local

recreation areas, this will leave a 15. 7 acre surplus by 1990.

Community

recreation areas now include Mackinaw City's park on Cecil Bay and the Mackinaw
High School.

Well over half of the Township's land area is in state forest land,

and the principal access to Wilderness State Park is through the Township.

L

The nature of Wawatam Township in terms of projected growth, land use,
land ownership and traffic pattern suggest that there are no basic local
recreation deficiencies. Moreover , the major portion of the local recreation demand can be met with facilities in Mackinaw Village.

2,

Local recreational facilities in Mackinaw Village may be increased if the
rate of population growth increases and new industry is attracted into the
area. Neighborhood parks and community recreation areas should then be
provided in accessible locations.
On the basis of broad scale recreational resources, additional park
land should be acquired on Cecil Bay, before it is entirely subdivided.
Seasonal home subdivisions should then be designed in cluster developments off the immediate shore areas.

4.

Other community recreation may be developed on the state owned lands,
school forests , and perhaps on former sanitary fill lands. The Township
owns 125 acres of land north of French Lake that has broad recreation use
potential.

5.

Tourist recreation in the Wawatam - Mackinaw community is greatly enhanced by Fort Michilimackinac. This outstanding historical attraction is
an authentic re-creation of the old fort community and is a model culturalhistorical-educational facility. Mackinaw Island, the Mackinaw Bridge,
Wilderness State Park, and the Straits of Mackinaw combine with the iFort
attraction into a major tourist complex.

6.

Broad scale recreation resources in the area can contribute to tourist
stayi ng power. Frenchman ' s Lake in Wawatam Township is the site of a
wildlife flooding project and proposed state campgrounds. The Carp Lake
Riv er should be protected as a canoeable trout stream and vacation activity
area . Most of the Township is important as a deer yarding region.

- 45 -

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

West Traverse Township -

Because there are no public parks, West Traverse

Township will have a statistical need for 4. 0 acres of community parks by 1990.
Actual acreage need could go beyond this if the Harbor Springs community experience substantial amounts of new growth.

This could necessitate one

or two

neighborhood parks.

Tourist visitation and seasonal home developments are quite advanced in the
Township.

The Land Use Inventory showed 135 seasonal homes and 110 one

family homes.

The community's ready access to ski resorts, harbor facilities

and state forests makes it attractive for recreation.

Also, there are scenic woods,

some steep topographic areas, and panoramic views over Little Traverse Bay.

Some local recreation actions may include:

1.

Provision of open space resources in developing residential areas to:
break-up the urban pattern, provide neighborhood play areas (sledding,
skating, picnicing, etc.), protect scenic resource areas in their natural
or wilderness images.

2.

Attempt to secure Lake Michigan frontage for Township recreation uses.
Open land along the shoreline is scarce and it may take years to establish
a significant public open space resource on the Lake.

3.

Consider developing a central community recreation area in one or more
of the following locations : (a) the 80 acre Emmet County Winter Park
(privately owned) in Section 3, if it becomes available; (b) on lands now
utilized for sanitary fill purposes at Houghton and Quick Roads; (c) perhaps in Sections s ·and 32, at the _west end of MiadLe. Road .

4.

Another recreation resource for Township residents is the 80 acre tract
owned by Friendship Township, one-half mile north of West Traverse
Township. This tract could be jointly owned and operated for recreation
purposes by both communities.

If the Township Hall is ever moved or reconstructed on a larger site, it
could be located on a recreation area to provide community building services as well as a large town hall site.

-46-

�I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I

I
I
I

Cities of Petoskey and Harbor Springs - Both of the incorporated Cities have
statistical park land surpluses through 1990.
population .

Both are expected to increase in

As a part of the County Recreation Plan, the separate recreation

plans prepared for these two communities are hereby declared to be a part of
the C o unty Comprehensive Recreation Plan.

The separate Plans are referenced

as follows :

1.

Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc., Recreational Facilities, Petoskey
Area Planning Commission, January, 1969.

2.

Williams and Works, Comprehensive Plan, Harbor Springs, Report 1,
1969.

Because of the vast land and resource potentials of Emmet County, it is difficult
to foresee every specific local recreational need that may; evolve in the ye a rs
ahead .

Hence, it is expected that the County Recreation Plan may be amended

from time to time to reflect the optimum needs of the moment.

These may relate ,

to population •g rowth, new town developments, desire to preserve a resource not
now inventoried, and/ or to accept land bequests from philanthropic persons in
the community.

Also, the evalvement of a county park system could reli·e ve

the individual '. townships of some recreation responsibilities, or may supplement
e x isting township parks.

-47-

�C £ C I L

.
-~

8

~G . .

A

r

T.HN.

,.►
~

8
STllHGEON

~

.. y

8

r

r

~
~
~

j

'
t
~

~

-"~~--~
'. I_

'

1

71

~

jf

T 57N.

:

I
I
I
I
I

J□
-J
L_ ~
--~:, ---- -- u- : '~~
U

1

:;

H

It

H

i

-.._..,,

I

h'

.'\~. 01.
ii

lr.

, I

T

~:

I

.

:

.

;if---=--=--=-~3-~::~~,
,
J~p
:;P ,, ll
i! ••,,........

ji

v,l~w;n•

~==~
~

. r .

T

'

'

l--~ -

~ ~ L _JI . ,_---~:~~:

__]

T. 36N

I
1,.,

In

JI

1,

.....::;:~~

~

n1

;D~[ u - - c~~-_- .~
I

\I

I

-"(~.g;
~... ,.

1.. '

·i'

_

.

\I_'._

r=-=,1 ~
__, lJ

-· ..

I [-

~ .. .,,J..L ,,
- ---- : :
-:
- ..::,rr

L=-·
,. _~
,GJ ~nf]-- -------1
,1.~ut
De
,ii~D'l□C______.
.U

4~ -

,~"=-.·

1:

I

-&lt;&gt;- -&lt;&gt;- .....,..,...

• ~I

1

:=1•
~
I

~%,:- -

_J

_: _;-

II

~"'~
'i!i,~.

-

•

.

-

'if~

-

&gt;f'."'-~
w E

:--]

~~LW~
-·
L 1

0-.-,

1

T

1

- - · -·

L

j

, I , ; ·]I ••

.~ I

•

1. lra; . 1JI' - :

~ nnl ,r 1

~~~_::- .

t..,

~~

~

"'

11 dl··--J----~1

t "J

T 30N.

'{

.J

LITTLE

TRAVERSE

8

A Y

... ... 4P:-, ,F',7 '--.-

·

I"

.1

j~
1
s

"

•

II
•

1CT--=dr --

... "'=l

I ,' (\~1'' ' \ ~ :

J-!□
I

!

·

1

~cu=~-

•

\; -

2.__..!l!

.,

1I

,~ ~ ~L

I, _..

LJ-1'~LJ~]l
~s-o
~~~:·__!i j~~-·
_ ... • ·!. , 1n1 ·
.', -~
1:=J.
l- .-1-~--r__..:In
,,_ .-

:
-~
-~
_,-. 2J_l
--~~
-R
di
~l

~"=='===='Jo·-· ~

=;r=

--

- --,~
E

l

A
._J

-,

, • ·

E'

1 '"""

~o-

7

1/

~~ P&gt; •

I

I
~"-----:_.

__. ' a• l'.c=

~
H((

\\

n

....

I

~ ~

~'IL

,,I'/

~

r# I.L~&amp;•
• ,1

Of ..-,. ~

rt

~

""°"
--- ---=----,........._~
,... --•:i•.u-~

"'!.II .........

•4' ~ ·

: J l ~ N C - - - N'll"a~
. ~r-«-..
LIM ~ UUS"......cl ~ ~ • OIUE n
MCTIQll'9l ;:Jl f"!!ill«-IIJ-c.6"Ta.t•S.. U .......~
~ l ' l 'r!C ~ ~.~
CJI~~

-

-•
~

~
++

•
vifico11 ~ lemoa a oasoc.. ii,c..,
p l oa11 i 119
co111allon11

I

RECREA TION

EMMET

M

\\

~

-~
- ~ - - :~J - ~

COUNTY

[ ' "'

PLAN

II

,.

11.

COUNTY
R 4W

HARDWOOD STATE FOREST PROJECT BOUNDARY

(modifl•d tom•what to r•f l•ct land ownu1hlp a u /1t lng usu )
EX IST ING REG IONAL PARK· RECREATI ON AREAS
EX IST ING LOCAL RECREAT ION
l comrnuni ty a ac hoo I
PROPOSED REG IONAL

a

COMM UNITY -WI DE RECREA T ION

(rtur 1tr•am corridor, , lake accH1, a ruou rce protect ion)

POTENT I AL LOCAL-COMM UN I TY RECREAT I ON AREAS
( i ncl udu ol ternatt 1i h1}
POTENTI AL WILDERNESS I MAGE ACCESS TO STATE PARK

+

)\
II \\.

!.,

r
,.

~

r

I

�---,

COUNTY-WIDE RECREATION PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATIONS
1.

County Entrance Points
There are four key roadway access points that can
be regarded as County entrances, Entrance points
may feature information centers, attractive landscaping, and/or coordinated sign treatment, as
they give visitors an immediate image of the
County. Harbor areas and airports are also entrance
areas that need beautification attention.

2.

I
~

00
I

SUGGESTED ACTION

Either the County or interested groups within the
County should initiate a program to beautify County
entrances. Similar action should be taken by the
larger communities so that uncontrolled billboarding and unsightly land uses are avoided. Countywide zoning or local zoning ordinances should
support the concepts of attractive entrance points.

Historical Sites
Emmet County has significant historical areas to
interest tourists and enrich the cultural characteristics of the County . Both Catholic and Protestant
missionaries pioneered early County development
through their work with the Indians. Some dominant
historical areas which hold a potential for increased
tourism-recreation development include : ( 1) original
Indian mission sites, and early churches ; (2) Indian
burial grounds and Indian village sites ; (3) lumbering
history; (4) the cottage of the Hemmingway family, and
(5) the passenger pigeon. Former mission communities, historical villages , and lumber towns can be
successful tourist attractions, and would complement
Fort Michilimackinac.

The County should work with religious faiths, local
historical groups, the State Historical Commission
and others, to evolve a strong inter-related historical
recreation complex. It is advantageous that the
strong history of the County relates closely to the
natural attractions of the Lake Michigan shore.
Measures to safe- guard existing nistorical features
should be explored as well as methods for financing
developments . Cross Village has a particularly strong
Indian-missionary history that can be enhanced by
historical development projects. Other points of
interest along the Lake Michigan shore can be worked
into the historical area known as L'Arbre Croche
Country.

�- - 3.

Parks and Public Access Sites
Emmet County, as a unit of government does not own
or maintain any parks. The State, individual townships, and municipalities own and operate existing
facilities for outdoor recreation. Fort Michilimackinac,
Wilderness, and Petoskey State Parks attract most of
the tourist oriented recreation, although ther-e are
other public access sites and campgrounds, .
Each park site and recreation area should have a development plan which respects the carrying capacity of the
land. As the demand approaches the park 1 s carrying
capacity, then the next phase of planned development
should be implemented, and/ or another park area established. The attraction features of each park should
also be multi-faceted, so that there are items which
can interest all age groups. A campground, for example, will function best if it can provide scenic trails,
playground apparatus, historical features and monuments,
and unique natural features (rock strata, wiidlife, pla::i:r.t
life, etc.).

I

.i,.

'°
I

4.

-

The County can appoint a committee(s) to evaluate
the aesthetic and recreational qualities bf _all existing park sites. Recommendations for improvements,
expansions, and broadened services should be
made to the appropr-iate sponsoring agency.
Although Emmet County has a comparatively low
total population, it would be well to investiget:e the
desirability of establishing a County Park system,
perhaps under a County Recreation Authori_tv.
County parks could then be developed in critical _ ,
recreation and resource areas where state, township or village governments may not wish to act or
cannot act. This would broaden the County 1 s resources to develop recreation areas and preserve
scenic attractions.

Game and Fish Management
County support of State fish and game management practices is important to the encouragement of hunters
and fishermen. Land developments and land uses
which infringe upon game longevity should be avoided.
In addition to the problems of stream bank erosion
from improper building and tree cutting, and the
extension o f highways through hab itat areas , snowmobile operators should be restr ic ted from game
areas de eme d vital for gan1e management success.

Game management programs should encompass three
major land owner ships : ( l) the Hardwood State
Forest , (2) other public lands , and (3) private
recreation-forest acreages. Timber, fish and
game management practices are essential elements of ecological balance, a concern which
extends into adjacent counties as well. With the
assistance of the particular agencies respons i ble ,
periodic reports should be available on area
resource management. Moreo v er , the retention
of productive farms should be recogn ize d as an
i mportant element of game management.

�5.

The Wilderness or Northern Image
Emmet County is unique from metropolitan areas, because it is 11 up north'' and has the aura of a great outdoors and wilderness. Although there are more primitive
regions in Michigan, Emmet is readily accessible by
land, water and air from metropolitan areas. Hence,
the image of a woods, waters, open space character
must be maintained in the face of pressures to over
develop.

I
(JI

0
I

6.

Wilderness type areas in Emmet County are in
the WiLderness State Park, Wa Watam Township,
the region between Larks Lake and the ski resorts,
and in the lower half of Springvale Township.
Woods, rolling topography, and swamp areas ensure this image at present.
The state and private forest owners will be most
responsible for determining the extent and use of
wilderness type areas. Tree cutting on hill sides
and along the roads are key areas of concern.
Canoe waters should be given high priority for
scenic easement protection and efforts made to
identify and promote canoeing as a significant
recreational feature of the County. Streams
must also be protected for their value in producing fish and their role in game management.

Topographic Resources
The region including Emmet County is unique for its
rolling-hilly landscape. Of importance is the fact that
there are numerous scenic overlooks and commanding
views of Lake Michigan and wooded country side.
There are broad valleys and wide vistas in many interior county areas.

Scenic views offer exceptional recreation potential
with a high attraction for tourists and visitors
from the flat land regions of most metropolitan
centers in the Midwest. The County should
pursue a long- range program to develop and/ or
promote access to strategic hill tops. Boyne
Highlands and Nubs Nob are examples of economic use of topographic features. Hiking trails
should follow carefully planned routes to offer
variety in terms of occasional views from ridge
lines, land form, game areas, and forest types.
Scenic views from highways should also be protected from urban development. One example
is on US - 131 as it enters Petoskey from the south
(Rotary Park area.)

�7.

Winter SE_orts
Snow and climatic conditions in Emmet County have
proven the potential for a long winter sports season.
Current activities include skiing, snowmobiling, and
skating.

Winter sports activity is heavily oriented to the
major ski resorts of Boyne Highlands and Nubs Nob.
Where feasible, smaller hills in Township or City
areas should be reserved for casual winter play
activity. A good example is Petoskey' s Winter
Sports Park. Sledding, tobogganing and skiing
would be permitted. Too often the topographic
resources become developed for cottage-resort
use, and the community at large has limited
access.
Snowmobile trails should be extended throughout
Emmet County and into adjacent counties to fit
into long cross-country trails. Utility easements
(power lines and natural gas) offer good potential for long distance trails.
Cross country
skiing and snow shoe routes also afford good
active outdoor recreation. Perhaps the Wilderness Golf Course and recreation subdivision in
Ca_!p Lake Township could be diversified into
a snowmobile resort complex.

I

U1
.....
I

8.

Geologic Points of Interest and Minerals
A significant recreation attraction to area visitors are
land forms which differ from the visitors I home area.
Their importance is demonstrated by the efforts of the
N~tional Park Service to acquire and develop the
Pictured Rocks area near Munising. Emmet County
has geologic attractions, most notably the cliffs along
Lake Michigan and the limestone quarries. The
"Petoskey Stone" is a product of geologic time and is commemorated - by an historical marker in Petoskey.
Lake Michigan sand beaches are another highly attractive resource.

Geologic and physiographic interest items should
be catalogued, mapped, described in terms of unusual features, historic importance and accessibility. Efforts should also be made to reserve
and preserve scarce resources , such as the sandy
beaches which extend from the Cross Village
area to Wilderness Park. Some undeveloped
lake front still exists in the area .

�9.

Private Recreation Enter.E_rises
The variety of resources and nearness to metropolitan
areas opens the door for private recreation enterprises
for all seasons. Boat marinas, lake trolling, recreation
farms, dude ranches, guided tours, camping areas,
canoe liveries, vacation homes, and ski resorts hold
varying potentials for individual investment. Moreover,
transportation factors are improving and metropolitan
centers continue to expand, increasing the demand for
outdoor recreation.
Private recreation must be part of the comprehensive
recreation picture and the concept of multiple use encouraged. Abandoned farms, marginal farms, and
productive farms may offer year around recreation services for hunting, camping, hiking trails, vacation farm
activity, snowmobiling and the like. Boating and canoeing are also popular activities.

I

u,
N
I

10.

Research and Education
The University of Michigan operates a forest research
facility near Pellston that encompasses several square
miles of land. Within the research area are two important streams -- Van Creek and the east' branch of
the Maple River.

Private outdoor recreation is needed if the area is
to reap economic benefits from the field of tourismrecreation. Public parks and access sites represent
only part of the required services. To the extent
feasible, individual (e.g. groups or persons) developments should work into the total County
theme for recreation and must form at least one
segment in a complex of recreation opportunity.
For example, golf course locations should consider their role in the establishment of vacation
home sites, retirement villages, resort developments and related. Therefore, public
parks, historic attractions, and private tourist
attractions must recognize the importance of their
facility in terms of its total attraction potential.
Will the facility be attractive and of quality, is
it self- supporting, can it also promote the use
of other facilities, does it contribute to wild
life management and resource conservation?
Answering these basic questions will decide
whether or not a recreational facility is part of
a comprehensive recreation system.
On- site tours would prove to be an educational
experience for tourists who may have little prior
knowledge of forest management practices and
ne-w methods being employed. A complete educational complex may include an operating sawmill, examples of timber grades, and related
aspects of the timber industry. Private wood
using industries in the County could add to the
forest industry tour to demonstrate the facinating
aspects of this industry. The recreation of a logging town (perhaps Pellston) can also promote
some of these objectives.

�11.

Trails
The physiography of Emmet County is highly adaptive to
the development of scenic trails as these are necessary
to complete the access sytitem to the area's recreation
attractions. Depending on the particular site and season,
wooded trails may be designated for hiking, snowshoeing, bicycling, horseback riding, cross- country
skiing, snowbwbiling, motorcycling, and jeep tours.
One trail cannot practically satisfy all modes of transportation, but trails should be designated for most types.

12.
I
(JI
I.,.)

Cooperating groups and agencies concerned with
Emmet County and its environs, should act to develop
a diverse trail system . With renewed interest in
bicycling, it may be unique to develop a bicycle
path through part of a timber stand . The same trail
could be used in winter for snow-·shoeing or crosscountry skiing. Equestrian pack trains into the
Wilderness Park area could be an attractive ~_tourist
experience. Of interest would be historic explorer
routes, Indian trails and the cross-country routes
-of early missionaries. Several of these must exist
between Petoskey, Harbor Springs and Mackinaw
City. (L'Arbre Croche County)

Lakes, Ponds and Rivers
Water oriented recreation is a major area attraction for
tourists, summer home residents and sportsmen. As
a rule there is less water access in resort areas than
there are tourists. Over use and over development is
therefore a problem.

Protecting the water resources of Emmet County
will be a major implementation objective, and
involves the State,. County, , and private land developers . The public concern should be to encourage
better development practices so that pollution does
not occur, and water recreation opportunities are
not limited to the privileged few. The concept
of.cluster developments is one means to achieve
both pollution control and resource preservation.
Public ownership or community control of shorelines, river banks, and scarce sandy beach areas
is the best preservation measures provided an
allowance is made for private development needs.
At the present time, there are undeveloped beach
areas, river valleys, lakes, and ponds that should
be preserved for broader public enjoyment and
not subdivided into small lots.

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008126">
                <text>Emmet-County_Comprehensive-Recreation-Plan_1970</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008127">
                <text>Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008128">
                <text>1970-03</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008129">
                <text>Comprehensive Recreation Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008130">
                <text>The Comprehensive Recreation Plan for Emmet County was prepared by Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc. in March 1970.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008131">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008132">
                <text>Recreation--Planning</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008133">
                <text>Emmet County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008134">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008136">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008137">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008138">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008139">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038314">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54688" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58959">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/4fa777eaecaee78ac3072cbda68381c4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>effd17fd8a781d75ed3d0945da611d2c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008125">
                    <text>ER and WATER
· FACILITIES

�I
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FOR
SEWER AND WATER FACILITIES
Emmet County, Michigan
APRIL, 1971

PART I-A:

Population, Economic
Conditions, Public Utilities, Resources, Agriculture, Land Patterns,
Trends and Water Resources.

PART II-A:

Maps of the Planning Area,
Soils, Topography, Land
Use, Sewer and Water Systems.

B:

Financing Plan

C:

Plan Updating Proposal

PART III:

Comprehensive Sewer and
Water Plan

PREPARED FOR:
THE EMMET COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
PREPARED BY:
VILICAN-LEMAN &amp; ASSOCIATES, INC.
COMMUNITY PLANNING CONSULTANTS
29621 NORTHWESTERN HIGHWAY
SOUTHFIELD, MICHIGAN 48076
and
McNAMEE, PORTER &amp; SEELEY
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN
The preparation of this report was financially aided through a Comprehensive Sewer and Water Planning Grant fro~ the Farmers Horne Administration of the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

�COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
WARD H. WALSTROM, Chairman
DONALD HODGKISS, Vice Chairman
CHARLES WILLS, Secretary
ROBERT CILKE, JR.
JAMES Co ESTERLINE
THOMAS FAIRBAIRN
SEBERON LITZENBURGER
HARRY PINTARELLI
ROBERT TRACY

COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSTONERS
HUGH HEYNIG, Chairman
HUBERT BACHELOR
ROBERT CILKE, JR.
AL FOSTER
ROBERT J. GREENWELL
ERNEST KUEBLER
DONALD D. JARDINE
ERNST MANTHEI
FRANK SCHMALZRIED
J o H. WEBSTER
Eo So WIXSON

�C O N T E N T S

FOREWARD

l

POPULATION

1

TRENDS
AGE GROUPS
PROJECTIONS
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS

1
2
4
6

AREA ECONOMIC CONDITIONS

8

FINANCIAL CONDITIONS

9

EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITIES
AREA-WIDE TRANSPORTATION
WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES
SANITARY LAND FILLS (Solid Waste Disposal)
CENTERS OF TRADE AND COMMUNICATION
NATURAL RESOURCES
SOILS
TOPOGRAPHY
DRAINAGE PATTERNS
WATER RESOURCES
AGRICULTURE, LAND PATTERNS AND TRENDS
LA.T\JD PATTERNS
POTENTIAL FOR RECREATION AND TOURISM
TRENDS IN COMMERCIAL USES
TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL USES
EMPLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION
TRENDS IN RESIDENTIAL USES

13
13
15
17
19
23
24
27
29
30
32
35
39
40
47
47
51

WATER RESOURCES

59

LONG RANGE FINANCING PLAN

60

PUBLIC ACT 185
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
ACT 94 REVENUE BONDS
STATE AND FEDERAL AID
ACT 188
SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS

60
61
62
62
63

PLAN UPDATING PROPOSAL

64

COMPREHENSIVE SEWER AND WATER PLAN

66

WASTE WATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT
COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEMS
FUTURE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS

66
72
79

�T A B L E S

•

1.

HISTORY OF POPULATION GROWTH - 1900-1970

1

2.

POPULATION TRENDS:

3

3.

SUMMARY OF COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS

4

4.

PROJECTIONS FOR COUNTY CIVIL DIVISIONS

5

5.

RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN SELECTED AREAS

6

6.

HOUSEHOLD SIZE - 1960

7

7.

STATE EQUALIZED VALUATIONS BY COMMUNITY

11

8.

TYPICAL TOWNSHIP - SCHOOL PROPERTY TAX

12

9.

RESIDENTIAL WATER AND SEWER SERVICES

16

10.

INVENTORY OF COMMUNITY SERVICES

22

11.

COUNTY SOIL RESOURCES

25

12 .

SELECTED FARM CHARACTERISTICS

33

1 3.

VALUE OF FARM PRODUCTS SOLD

34

14.

EXISTING LAND USE

36

15.

RETAIL SALES BY YEAR

42

16.

1960 OCCUPATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS

48

17.

EMPLOYEES BY MAJOR INDUSTRY GROUP

50

18 .

PETOSKEY, MICHIGAN - COMPLETE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS
OF WATER

74

A.W.W . A. WATER QUALITY GOALS
U.S.P,H . S. DRINKING WATER STANDARDS

74

HARBOR SPRINGS, MICHIGAN - COMPLETE CHEMICAL
ANALYSIS OF WATER

75

MACKINAW CITY, MICHIGAN - COMPLETE CHEMICAL
ANALYSIS OF WATER

76

WELLS DRILLED IN EMMET COUNTY IN 1970

78

1930 to 1970

•

19.
20 .

210
22 .

�I L L U S T RA T I 0 N S

J

J

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE

22A

EXISTING COMMUNITY WATER SERVICE

22B

GENERALIZED SOIL RESOURCES

24A

TOPOGRAPHY

27A

EX I STING LAND USE

35A

RESIDENTIAL AREAS PLAN

53A

FUTURE COMMUNITY WATER SERVICE

69A

FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE

79A

�A P P E N D I X T A B L E S

J

J
J

1.
--;---

EXISTING LAND USE - SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 1

A-1

2.

EXISTING LAND USE - SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 2

A-2

3.

EXISTING LAND USE - SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 3

A-3

4o

EXISTING LAND USE - SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 4

A-4

5

EXISTING LAND USE - SUPERVISOR DISTRICTS NO'S. 5 - 11

A-5

0

�FOREWORD

J
J

This report is titled the "Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plan", for
Emmet County, Michigan, and was funded by a planning grant from the
Farmers Home Administration, U. S. Department of Agriculture.
When application was made for the Farmers Home Administration planning
grant, a supplemental planning program was funded by the U. S. Department of Housing and Urban Development to prepare a County-wide Comprehensive Land Use Plan. The operation of this two phase planning
program resulted in a more comprehensive approach to County planning.
The Water and Sewer Plan is more complete because it benefited from
detailed land use plans developed under the "70ltr work.
Conversely,
the Comprehensive County Land Use Plan will be more complete because
of the research completed for this plan.
The two programs dovetailed well from a technical point of view, and
both were coordinated under the auspices of the Emmet County Planning
Commission . This Plan was accepted and approved by a formal resolution of the Planning Commission on April 21, 1971.
It is cautioned that much of the basic statistical analysis work was
completed before any 1970 census data was available. Hence, persons
using this report should consider this unavoidable limitation.
For
some data, however, census data recently available has been trinserted"
to give a more accurate trend picture.

J

l

-

�COMPREHENSIVE SEWER AND WATER
PLAN:
PART I and PART II

�POPULATION

!Eart I

Ao 1 . )

In November of 1969, a Comprehensive Analysis and Report of Population
in Emmet County was prepared with FHA Planning Assistance Funds. The
conclusions from that report are summarized and updated herein so that
the finds will be current for this Comprehensive Water and Sewer Plan.
TRENDS
Emmet County's population in 1960 was lower than it was in 1950. Also,
the County's population in 1930 was only slightly lower than the 1960
total.
However, the 1970 Census reports show a 15.3% increase over
1960. Despite this recent gain, the County reached its peak population in 1910.
The history of County population change since 1900 is summarized in
TABLE 1.

TABLE 1
HISTORY OF POPULATION GROWTH - 1900 to 1970
Emmet County
County Population

Census Year
1900
1910
1920
1930
1940
1950
1960
1970

15,931
18,561
15,639
15,109
15,791
16,534
15,904
18,337

Emmet County's past growth represents a long period of population
stability, despite two World Wars, a major depression and other
volitile national growth influences.
In the decades from 1930 to
1970, the population increased 14.6%, yet the 1910 population was
230 persons higher than in 1970.
Emmet County is composed of 16 Townships ranging in size from 185
citizens to a population of 2,450.
The past growth pattern of these
communities varied from one another, some increasing gradually while
others lost population.

- l -

�TABLE 2 illustrates the recent history of population growth among the
communities of the County. Only four Townships have increased in population in each Census year between 1930 and 1970. These are the Townships of Little Traverse, Littlefield, Resort and Springvale. Bear
Creek Township and West Traverse Township have experienced consistent
growth since 1940.
Between 1950 and 1960, eight Townships reported
population decreases .
Since 1960, six Townships reported declines .
Population losses since 1960 occurred in the Townships of Bliss, Carp
Lake, Friendship, McKinley, Pleasantview and Readmond.
Those that
experienced increases, exceeded the growth rates of the Cities and
Villages .
Little Traverse and Center Townships increased by a rate
ov~r 60%. WaWatam Township had the lowest percent increase at 17.1%
which exceeded the County average of 15.3%.
In the order of importance, the largest numerical population gains
occurred in Bear Creek Township, Little Traverse Townsnip, Littlefield
Township, Resort Township, Harbor Springs, Petoskey, Springvale Township and Center Township.
AGE GROUPS
,Some of the population age group data which characterized Emmet County
in 1960 is described below. This data should be re-evaluated when the
results of the 1970 Census become available.
1.

Pre-School Age (Under 5 years)
In 1960, 12.4% of Michigan's population was under five years of
age . West Traverse Township had 16%.
In the order of highest
percentage, Springvale, Bear Creek, Wawatam, Resort and Friendship Townships also exceeded the State average.
Pleasantview,
Center and Cross Village Townships reported fewer than 6% of the
population in this age group.

2.

School Age to young Adults (5 to 24 years)
Both the County and State have 33.7% of their population in the
school age - young adult group.
Eleven of the 16 Townships have
higher than average proportions, with Readmond, Friendship, West
Traverse, Bliss, Center and Resort Township's exceeding 36% ~

3.

Family Forming or Young Labor Force (25 - 44 years)
A consistent population disparity with State averages in northern
communities is the family forming or young labor force population
group.
The State reported 26.5% of the 1960 population in this
group, while Emmet County reported 21.8%.
Only Pleasantview Township exceeds the State average, with 53% of
the population aged 25 to 44 years.
In contrast, Cross Village
and Center Townships have less than 16% of their population in
this age group.
- 2 -

�\---4

L.J

TABLE 2
POPULATION TRENDS:

1930 to 1970

Emmet County &amp; Civil Divisions

Township_s_:

w

Bear Creek
Bliss
Carp Lake
Center
Cross Village
Friendship
Little Traverse
Littlefield
McKinley
Maple River
Pleasantview
Readmond
Resort
Springvale
Wawatam
West Traverse

1930

__
1940,

1950
-

1960
-

1,227
399
374
442
323
336
4-40
691
1,121
53 8
165
362
656
298
298
270
7,94-0

1,204
421
431
425
290
428
481
835
980
540
207
4-40
708
371
343
245
8,349

1,756
355
524
307
228
297
575
842
845
415
114
352
727
387
397
319
8 , 4- 4-_0

1,859
298
464
215
14-0
318
602
906
8 4-3
335
198
246
74- 8
467
368
326
8,333

287
1, 4-2 9
'283
810
5,740
7,169

330
1,4-23
326
562
6,019
7, 44-2

319
1,626
365
4- 4-2
6, 4-6 8
8,094-

290
1,433
336
429
6,138
7,571

15, rog

15,791

16,534-

15,904

60 to 70 Chan~e
Number Percent
591
31. 8
- 16 - 5.4
- 5.4
- 25
134
62.3
45
32.1
78
-24.5
63,6
383
39.7
360
- 0.9
8
23,9
80
_
3
7. 4
- 74
- 12 - 4.9
· 2 51
34.9
4 2. 0
196
17.1
63
28.8
9 41,98423.8%

1970
2,450
282
439
349
185
2 4-0
985
1,266
835
415
1242 3 41,009
663
431
4-2 0
10,327

Cities &amp; Villages:
~':Alanson
Harbor Springs
*Mackinaw City (pt)
~•:Pellston
Petoskey City
County
NOTE:

-

72
229
6
40
204
4-3 3

2--;1+21

2 4-. 8
16.0
- 1.8
9.3
3. 3

s-:r
15. 3%

362
1,662
330
469
6,342
8,004
18, 3 jl

Villages indicated with* are included with their respectiv e Townships and
not added under the category 11 cities and villagesir,

�4.

Mature Family Group (45 to 64 years)
Nearly 21% of the County population is aged 45 to 64 years, which
compares closely with the State's proportion of 19.2%. Township
proportions range from the low 11.6% in Pleasantview to the high
of 26.5% in Center.
In general, Northern Michigan communities
have higher proportions of mature family aged groups and Emmet
County reflects this pattern.

5.

Retirement Age Group (65 and over)
Emmet County has a significantly higher proportion of retirement
age citizens than the State (12.1% compared with 8.1%).
Only two
Townships have percentages lower than the State average:
Pleasantview 3% and Friendship 7.9%. Cross Village has the highest proportion with 27.1%. A large proportion of retirement age citizens
is also typical of northern area communities.

PROJECTIONS
For the purposes of the Emmet County Comprehensive Plan, four population
projections to 1990 were completed for a 22 year projection period,
beginning with 1968 . These were done before 1970 Census data was
available.
The results of the various methods are summarized on
TABLE 3.

I

I
TABLE 3
SUMMARY OF COUNTY POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Emmet County

Projection Method

1960
Population

1990
Projection

Long Term Arithmetic

15,904

18,331

16,700

Long Term (Dept. of Commerce)

15,904

18,331

18,180

Short Term Arithmetic

15,904

18,331

21,890

Short Term Ratio Apportionment

15,904

18,331

22,000

Average

J

1970
Population

19,9 4 0

-

4 -

�If the four projection methods are averaged, the 1990 population would
total 19,940 persons . As a general conclusion, the short range projection techniques appear to be the most accurate in view of the 1970
total population.
If the current pace of growth continues, the 1990
"average" projection figure will be reached by 1980.
It was assumed that the Michigan Department of Commerce projections
for the Civil Divisions of Emmet County would be reasonable working
estimates of future population.
These are presented along with the
adjusted population for communities in the Petoskey Area on TABLE 4,
"Projections for County Civil Divisions".
The 1970 population Census
strongly indicates that many Civil Divisions are growing more rapidly
than the Department of Commerce figures indicate.
In any event, it
should be recognized that projections for smaller community areas,
are tenuous and more subject to inaccurate results. Also, the process
of apportioning a total County population of less than 20,000 persons
among 18 communities is always a questionable procedure.

TABLE 4
PROJECTIONS FOR COUNTY CIVIL DIVISIONS
Emmet County

County Civil Divisions

1960
Population

Bear Creek Township
Bliss Township
Carp Lake Township
Center Township
Cross Village Township
Friendship Township
Little Traverse Township
Littlefield Township (Alanson)
McKinley Township
Maple River Township
Pleasantview Township
Readmond Township
Resort Township
Springvale Township
WaWatam Township
West Traverse Township
Harbor Springs (City)
Petoskey (City)
Total County
1

2

-

1
1990
Projection

1990 Projection
Adjusted for
Petoskey Area
Projections

1,859
298
464
215
140
318
602
906
843
335
198
246
748
467
368
326
1,433
6,138

2,63Q
247
582
94
65
238
770
1,040
810
226
165
150
860
565
450
400
1,750
7,138

2,380
Low
3,165
Low
Low
7,520

15,904

18,180

22,502

5,050
Low
Low
4,387
Low
Low

Michigan Department of Commerce Projections. The 1970 U.S. Census
provides a basis for re-evaluating the projection results for Civil
Divisions.
Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc., Projection for the Petoskey Area
Planning Commission, and comments based on 1970 Census findings.
-

5 -

2

�With t he adjustments made for Petoskey, Bear Creek Township and Resort
Township, the total projected 1990 County Population is 22,500 . This
f i gure will be used for the purposes of the Comprehensive Plan.
It is
r easonable, but slightly conservative in view of the 242.7 person per
year growth experienced since 1960.
OTHER CHARACTERISTICS
1.

Commuting Patterns
Ac cording to t he 1960 U. S . Census of Population, 262 workers commut ed to jobs outside of Emmet County (5.5% of the employed workers ).
Comparat i ve commuting rates in adjoining Counties are:
6 . 0% in
Ot sego, 7. 5% in Cheboygan and 11 . 3% in Charlevoix o It may be conclu ded that a comparatively high rate of persons who work in the
County live in the County . Hence, a new employment source in Emme t
Cou nty will attract employees and families into the County as well .

2.

Dens i ty
For each resident in Emmet County there is 16.2 acres of land .
Considerably less per capita area is available when the influx
of tourists are included . The results of an analysis of density
for selected residential blocks in the County are presented on
TABLE 5 .

TABLE 5
RESIDENTIAL DENSITY IN SELECTED AREAS
Emmet County
Select ed
Commu nity

Land Eer Dwelling

Alanson
Brutu s
Conway
Cross Village
Pells t on
Lev ering
Oden
Pon-she-wa-ing (Oden)
Paradise Lake
Van

1 0,000
12,500
7,650
15,000
6,600
9,720
12,860
6,000
12,500
15,000

square
square
square
square
square
square
square
square
square
square

feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet
feet

Dwellings
:12er acre
4 o3
3. 5
5. 7
2. 9
6.6
4. 5
3. 4
7.3
3. 5
2. 9

The fo r ego i ng density l ist i s based on sample blocks in areas where
the r e a r e no community water or sewer systems . Within each community
area individual homes may be sited on either smaller or larger sites .
-

6 -

�Households &amp; Family Size
In 1960 there were 4,696 households in Emmet County as reported in the
U. S o Census of Population. Dividing the population in households by
the number of households gives an average population per household of
3 . 33 persons. This is compared with other communities in TABLE 6 .

TABLE 6
HOUSEHOLD SIZE - 1960
Community
The State of Michigan
Emme t County
Charlevoix County
Cheboygan County
Grand Traverse County

Average Number of Persons
per Household in 1960
3 . 42
3.33
3.35
3.49
3.31

1950 to 1960
Percent Change
+ 24 . 9 %
2 . 1%
0 . 3%
+ 6 . 5%
+ 21. 3%

Comparatively, the County has a low po~ulation per household, and had
been decreasing through 1960 . This trend may or may not be continuing
through 1970, but is probably influenced by: fewer young people livi ng
on farms, increased retirement age population, high proportion of
retirement age citizens, and the in-migration of students at North
Central Michigan College.

J

- 7 -

�AREA ECONOMIC CONDITIONS !PART I A. 2.)
Emmet County's location in the northwest regi0n of the State has a
direct relationship on economic conditions in the area .
From sev eral
indices, the regi0n including the County is economically behind the
State of Michigan, recogn i zing that the State economy is heav ily influenced by rapidly growing and industrialized metr opolitan areas . In
general, the northern and nonmetropolitan areas of the State are i nfluenced by resource industries (agriculture, forestry, fishing, min- ·.
ing, etc.) rather than manufacturing. Moreover, retail services a r e
highly dependent upon seasonal trade fr0m tourist recreation act iv i ty.
The result of these regional conditions are manifested by seasonal
employment fluctuations, lower wage scales, and limited job oppor t un i ties .
There tends to be a predominance of older citizens of retirement age,
community services . '.are generally inadequate - especially water and
sewer utilities, and housing has a higher incidence of substandardness .
As there are broad differences in the economic characteristics of the
State, there are economic differences among communities withi n a r egie2m .
For example, Emmet County has economic resour-ces and economic activ ities
that differ from other Counties in the Northwest Region.
Following is a summary of economic indicators that reflect on the char acter and status of Emmet County's economy.
Data sources reflect Comprehensive Plan finding, census reports, assessors records, sales tax
reports and data published for the Northwest Economic Development
District .
1.

Slightly less than the region average in acreage of commercial
forest (182,700 acres) .
This suggests that the County has a forestry economy that is t yp i ca l
of other Counties in the region .

2.

Based upon 1967 M, E . S.C . data Emmet County had a February unemployment rate of 9.5%.
This dropped to 4.5% in August (av erage 8.0 %
for 1967) .
The County has a high rate of unemployment in comparison with Stat eNational averages . Peak seasonal employment gains br i ng the Cou nty
up to the State average for a brief period in the summer .

3.

Agriculture is a _good basic economic activity, with high spec i a l ization in livestock (dairy, poultry, and other) . The average
agric ultural employment was 300 jobs according to 1 967 M. E . S . C.
U. S . Census findings reflect a declining trend in farm employment ,
bu t an increasing v alue of farm products are sold .

- 8 -

�4.

Population trends are a general index of overall economic conditions.
Emmet County has maintained a fairly stable population
level for several decades, with the 1990 population being almost
equal to the 1960 level.
Since 1960, however, growth has been
taking place and if the trend continues the 1990 population will
approximate 22,500 persons.
Urban influenced areas will absorb
most of this impact.

So

Tax collections on retail sales give a strong indication of growth
in the retail community.
Between 1962 and 1969, sales taxes collected in Emmet County increased by 68%.

6.

Real Estate values in Emmet County are also increasing at a high
rate.
From Farm Census data, it was reported that the average
value of farms has increased 136% between 1954 and 1964. This
high change results in part from farm consolidation and in part
from increased demands for land on a state wide scale.
County assessment records also indicate strong upward trends in
the value of Real Estate.
In 1968, the County's State Equalized
Valuation was $62.9 million. The 1970 S.E.V. stands at $98,0
million.

7.

Other indices of economic vitality in Emmet County show growth
trends in: wholesale trade sales, retail sales, value added by
manufacturing and bank deposits.

FINANCIAL CONDITIONS
Tpe financial ability of every community must be viewed in terms of a
particular project or community facility.
There are usually two basic
determinants of financial ability:
1.

Legal permissives or limitations on local financing.

2.

Community acceptance of policies of programs to utilize available
financing.

Legal financing limitations are determined by State Statute, and as a
rule there are fewer financing alternatives available to townships than
to cities.
However, townships are permitted to provide and maintain
various acilities, including water mains and sewage collection
systems.

1

1

With a County Department of Public Works, Emmet County could lend
its credit for up to $9.8 million worth of public works (water,
sewage and solid wastes.)
-

9 -

�A significant finding irom TABLE 7 shows that the Township communities
are accounting for an increasingly larger share of the total County
valuation . In 1968, townships accounted for 63.3% of the total and
by 1970, the proportion increased to 68.9%. Two townships with the
largest valuations are Bear Creek and Resort, and both of these communities are within the urbanizing influence of the City of Petoskey.
Also, both Resort and Bear Creek have substantial lake frontages for
cottage and seasonal home development in locations farther removed
from Petoskey.
·
Five (5) townships which are experiencing pressures from urbanization
and tourism-recreation development are Wawatam, Little Traverse, Littlefield, West Traverse and Springvale. The equalized valuations of these
communities range from 3.3% to 7.5% of the County total . These Townships also increased their share of the County total valuation (except
West Traverse). Even though Pleasantview Township houses major ski
resorts and seasonal home developments, the proportion of total County
valuation is only 2.5%.
The remaining Township communities each account for less than 3.3% of
the County's total valuation. As a general observation, the tax base
of the major urban and tourist influenced townships is broadening and
therefore a corresponding legal ability to finance public improvements
for water and sewage facilities.
Each Township in Emmet County has a different tax rate.
This is because
the local population varies, some Townships support services which others
do not (as a cemetery), local assessments of true cash value vary, and
different school district taxes are involved. TABLE 8 was prepared to
illustrate the combined affect of the variables affecting local tax
levies. The TABLE shows the theoretical situation of a $20,000 home,
and how it would be valued and assessed in each Township.
The basis of most local financial ability is the valuation of all property in the community . This data is used to determine overall bond debt
ability, which can be exceeded by extra voted millage authorized by the
citizenry. Of itself, however, the assessed valuation does not; (a)
reflect the ability of individual families to afford a given tax levy,
(b) show the need for a given project, (c) indicate citizen desires to
have the service.
TABLE 7 gives a comparative list of assessed valuations as equalized
for each community in the County since 1968. Through property reevaluation and some new development, there was a dramatic rise in the
valuations between 1968 and 1969 . However, the $4.28 million increase
between 1969 and 1970 is due largely to new development.

- 10 -

�TABLE 7
STATE EQUALIZED VALUATIONS BY COMMUNITY
Emmet County

1968
Bear Creek
Bliss
Carp Lake
Center
Cross Village
Friendship
Littlefield
Little Traverse
Maple River
McKinley

f-'
f-'

$ 5,570,465
468,150
1,439,470
492,415
635,295
613,121
2,354,045
3,980,654
786,256
1,386,190

1968
Percent
8.86%
.74
2.29

1969

1970

1.01

$10,165,720
720,779
2,803,304
670,454
1,066,485

$10,727,362
726,588
3,050,153
681,558
1,079,342

.98
3.74
6.33
1.25
2.20

1,132,554
4,368,430
6,871,040
1,474,623
2,185,315

1,152,416
4,621,860
6,674,502
1,745,664
2,590,696

•78

1970
Percent
10.94%
. 74
3.11
•70

1.10
1.18
4.71
6.95
1. 7 8
2.64

Pleasantview
Readmond
Resort
Springvale
Wa\Jatam
West Traverse
Total

1,374,852
1,021,384
13,269,882
1,149,967
2,476,770
2,751,859
$39,770,775

2.19
1.62
21.11
L 83
3. 94
4.38
63.25%

2,070,259
1,374,687
16,447,410
3,006,618
5,894,248
3,313,252
$63,564,908

2,426,763
1,447,417
16,602,352
3,284,069
7,366,710
3,405,011
$67,582,463

2.48
1. 48
16.93
3.35
7.51
3. 47
68.97%

Petoskey
Harbor Springs
Total

$19,050,075
4,055,546
$23,105,621

30.30%
6.45%
36.75%

$23,509,704
6,645,088
$30,154,792

$23,758,147
6,661,350
$30,419,497

24.23%
6.80%
31. 13 %

Emmet County

$62,876,396

$93,719,700

$98,001,960

SOURCE:

100.0%

Mr. Alan F. Behan, Director
Emmet County Equalization Department

100.0%

�TABLE 8
TYPICAL TOWNSHIP - SCHOOL PROPERTY TAX
Emmet County
$20,000 HOME AS A BASE
S.E.V. Assess.:::.
ment, 50% of
True Cash Value
Bear Creek
Bliss
Carp Lake
Center
Cross Village
Friendship
Littlefield
Little Traverse
Maple River
McKinley
Pleasantview
Readmond
Resort
Springvale
Wawatam
West Traverse

$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000
$10,000

Totals for Averaging
County Average (Townships)

SOURCE FOR TAX RATES:

Book Value for
Tax purposes
by Township
$

6,940
6,250
9,520
5,340
7,750
5,780
6,620
5,980
9,610
8,260
7,630
4,460
9,350
4,440
8,060
6,490

Typical
Tax Bill
for 1969
$

33 7 .4 2
302 . 25
355 000
307 . 58
286 . 90
342 . 11
399 , 38
349 . 90
343.27
302.65
348 . 46
342.93
326 . 03
391.83
323.32
345 098

$112,480

$5,405.01

$

$

7,030

337 . 81

Mr. Alan F. Behan, Director
Emmet County Equalization Department

The overall differential between the high and low township amounted to
$112.48 in 1969, ranging from $286.90 to $399.38. Altogether, the
township's averaged $337,81.
This illustration of a typical tax on a
$20,000 home is only theoretical.
There are other costs related to
home ownership that are not included, such as special service fees
and other private contractual fees that may include well drilling,
septic tank cleaning, garbage collection and non-county snow plowing.

- 12 -

�EXISTING PUBLIC UTILITIES

(PART I A . 3.)

AREA-WIDE TRANSPORTATION
Emmet County has access to several major area-wide transportation services.
These relate to the economy of the County in terms of tourismrecreation, industrial development and retail services.
1.

Highways
The most dominant highway feature serving the County is the I-75
Freeway. Although only a small portion of the freeway actually
enters the County, it is accessible from several major State roads
serving the northwest region of the Lower Peninsula, as well as
County roads.
I-75 is a key transportation facility for truckers
who are moving increased volumes of highway freight and tourists
from metropolitan areas who can now visit the County more often on
two day weekends. A second freeway route (US-131) is planned in
future years to enter Emmet County .
US-31 is a major State trunkline passing through the entire length
of the County. This highway links the Mackinaw Bridge (and I-75)
with the County Airport, and the urban areas of Petoskey.
It is
expected that Highway US-31 will continue as a major local facility
to serve business, industry and tourism-recreation.
Future freeways will supplement the functions of this roadway.
US-131 is a major State trunkline entering the County from the
south, and is a major regional access route from the south.
North of Petoskey, US-131 is a scenic road along Lake Michigan
and it links the Harbor Springs service center with Petoskey.

2.

Airports
Emmet County has three public airports, the County Airport at
Pellston, the Harbor Springs Airport east of Harbor Springs and
the Mackinaw City Airport north of Carp Lake.
a.

Pellston
The County Airport at Pellston is the only scheduled commercial
air service facility in the County, and it serves a fi v e Co u nty
area including Cheboygan . Existing terminal facilities are inadequate to serve the increased passenger traffic generated by
the larger fan jet aircraft and increasing numbers of peop l e
who use air travel service.
Runway extensions are underway
and a new east-west runway may be necessary in the next 20
years.
A conservative projection of traffic shows a 1,000 daily passenger load by 1973 . This is a volume comparable to existing
loads at the Bay City-Midland-Saginaw Airport, some 160 mi l es
to the south. Once the runway extensions have been completed
a major air terminal expansion will be made,
- 13 -

�The Pellston Airport will expand as the area's major air
traffic facility.
It is important, therefore, that residential,
industrial and recreation developments recognize the impact
of jet aircraft and runway approach zones when locating in
the area.
Homes, schools and industries must be planned
around the basic needs of the operating airport and new
demands for community water and sewage services may evolv e
in the area .
b.

Harbor Springs
The City of Harbor Springs owns the County's seco nd largest
air traffic facility in the County. It is primarily a chartered flying service facility, handling executive type aircraft, but no scheduled airline service.
The Harbor Springs Airport is well located near Little Traverse
Bay, major ski resorts, and concentrated areas of recreation
homes.
This produces a year-round market for private-recreational air service between Emmet County and metropolitan
centers in the Midwest.
In the recent five year period, aircraft movements have increased by more than 65%.
The combination of features that make the airport attractive to air
traffic also attract development. Hence, industries, homes
and seasonal-resort dwellings are attracted to the Bay area
and are clustering near to the airport lands.
Some industry
has located adjacent to the airport. The growing use of this
airport and the development of surrounding lands has created
the need to provide community water-sewage facilities.

c.

Mackinaw City
The Village of Mackinaw City owns some 320 acres of land north
of Paradise Lake (also Carp Lake) that has been used for private-recreation air traffic. Having sod runways and no improvements, this landing field receives very minimum use.
The
future of this land for airfield development is not optimistic
and casual private use may be the extent of demand .
Increased demands for use would be greater if an Industrial
Park area were feasible to develop in Mackinaw City or the
lands intervening the City and the Airport.
Until then this airport will have little or no impact on the
area in terms of land use or public facility requirements.

- 14 -

�3.

Lake Ports
With over seventy (70) miles of Lake Michigan shoreline, Emmet
County has access to the shipping lanes of the Great Lakes . At
present, there is only one major industrial port in the County
and this is owned and operated by the Penn-Dixie Cement Company
in Resort Township.
Penn-Dixie is a major County employer involved with mining limestone reserves along the Lake Michigan
shoreline. Another deep-water port is accessable t hrough
Mackinaw City in nearby Cheboygan County.
Recreation boating is the most dominant uses of local harbors and
marinas. This generates demands for docking facilities and a need
for facilities to handle sanitary wastes from both pleasure and
commercial boating activities. The day has passed when direct
dumping of sanitary wastes in any Great Lake can be permitted,
Recreation craft, lake carriers and foreign freighters must be
required to dump wastes in approved land based community disposal systems.
Natural water ways (rivers, lakes and oceans)
can no longer be considered the "final stage 11 in the sewage treatment process.

WATER AND SEWER UTILITIES
At the present time, complete water and sewerage utilities serve the
developed portions of the Cities of Petoskey, Harbor Springs, and the
Village of Mackinaw City.
The Bay View Association in Bear Creek Township has a water and sewage
system connected with Petoskey, but service is now provided only in
the summer months,
The Bay View water mains are above the frost level
and therefore cannot be used in winter months.
For this reason, the
Bay View dwellings are not occupied during the winter skiing season .
There are a few other water and sewer service extensions near the City
of Petoskey, but these are close to the City limits.
In the past,
Petoskey maintained a policy that services would not be extended unless accompanied by annexation. However, broader area-wide services
from the City's system are now feasible.
The City of Harbor Springs ~xtends water services westerly to serv e
the Tamarack Trails subdivisions and easterly into the Wequetonsing .
Sewage collection services closely follow areas within the City limits .
A more complete in-depth review of water and sewer services in Emmet
County will be prepared in the engineering sections of this County
Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plan.

- 15 -

�The 1960 Census of Population and Housing provided some basic data on
how County families are being served by sanitary disposal facilities
and community water supplies. TABLE 9 summarizes the significant comparisons between the State and County, including a breakdown for rural
Emmet County. This data should be re-evaluated when the 1970 Census
findings are made available.

TABLE 9
RESIDENTIAL WATER AND SEWER SERVICES
Emmet County
Dwelling Service by Number and Percent
Rural NonFarm
Rural
State of
Emmet County Emmet County Michigan

To t a l
Emmet -Count y

Source of Water
Community System

1,547
29.5%

12
2 . 2%

NIA

NIA

Individual Well

3,318
63.4%

460
82.7%

NIA

NIA

Other or None

372
7.1%
5,237

84
15.1%
556

NIA

NIA

3,746
71.4%

388
71. 2%

85.7%

6,155
77.4%

812
15.5%

64
11. 7%

8.5%

955
12 . 5%

690
13.1%
5,248

93
17.1%
545

5.8%
100 . 0%

Public-Community
System

1,038
19 . 8%

None

Septic Tank

3,272
62.5%

418
75.1%

Other or None

927
17. 7%
5,237

138
24 . 9%
556

7 ~1

Water Service
Hot and Cold Water
in Dwelling
Cold Water Only
in Dwelling
No Piped Water
in Dwelling

801
10 .1 %
7 ,951

Sewa~e Dis;eosal

SOURCE:

U.S. Census of Housing, 1860

-

16

-

94.0%

6,689
84 .1%

6 . 0%
100.0%

1,262
15 . 9%
7,951
100 . 0%

�The conclusions from TABLE 9 indicate the following:
22.5% of the County's dwelling units have only cold water piped in
the structure or have no domestic water in the dwelling (10 . 1%
none).
This condition affects 1,796 dwellings. Assuming half of
these to be seasonal homes, some 2,900 County residents are without adequate water service (900 d.u. x 3,22 per household= 2,880
persons).
801 dwellings (perhaps 400 permanent) have no water service inside
the structure.
456 dwellings (perhaps 230 permanent) do not have a private well
or community water supply.
Nearly 16% of all dwellings have no community sewer system or
septic tank, hence, either there is no sewage facility or the
dwelling has a privy. This affects an estimated 2,000 residents
in the County.
As may be reasonable to assume, most of the inadequately served units
are in rural nonfarm and rural farm areas, because community services
were not available in 1960. Overall, from 15 to 22 percent of all
dwellings have inadequate utility services, even though up to half of
these may be seasonal . However, both seasonal and permanent residences have minimum adequate facilities for sanitary health reasons
as well as to avoid resource pollution.
SANITARY LAND FILLS (Solid Waste Disposal)
Land fill sites are indicated on the ncommunity Facilities" map. When
needed, additional land fill sites can probably be developed with relative ease, because of the rural nature of the County.
However, it
may prove effective to operate land fills in areas where land reclamation could prove beneficial to recreation developments or other
extensive use adaptations. Not withstanding these objectives, care
should be exercised to ensure that land fill sites have minimum
nuisance affects to home areas, tourist facilities and scenic resources o
Other methods of solid waste disposal, such as incineration, probably
would not be considered unless serious pollution and nuisance hazards
occur from existing methods, or unless technological developments
render other methods more feasible,
In any system of waste disposal,
all communities of the County should seriously consider jointly operated disposal areas . This will reduce the number of active disposal
sites operating at a given time and will facilitate the cost of maintaining lands and equipment .

.

]

- 17 -

�Bliss, Center, Pleasantview and Readmond Townships have no sanitary
land fills operating at the present time. However, these communities
may be cooperating with an adjacent Township.
The Cross Village site
is currently unlicensed . Because of operating costs, several Townships may have to cooperate in the operation of sanitary fill areas .
Another feasible method would be to operate a County-wide system
through a County Department of Public Works,
Existing sanitary fill sites are located as follows:
Carp Lake Township, Section - 2
Wawatam Township, Section - 13 in Mackinaw City
Cross Village Township, Section - 34
West Traverse Township, Section - 3
Little Traverse Township, Section 10
Littlefield Township, Section - 17
Springvale Township, Section - 2
Bear Creek Township, Section - 8
Resort Township, served by Bear Creek
Center Township, None
Readmond Township - None
Maple River Township, Section - 3 in Pellston
McKinley Township, Section - 1
Pleasantview Township - None
Bliss Township - None
Friendship Township, served by West Traverse
As evident from the County's Land Use Inventory, there appears to be
a need for disposal areas for used automobiles and major appliances .
It would be most desirable if these waste items could be delivered
to an industry involved with converting the scrap to usable industrial
metals .
Future solid waste disposal demands will increase as a result of increasing tourist visitation and local population growth.
Some items
that will pose serious disposal problems in the future are:
depreciated mobile homes (permanent and travel vehicles).
discarded automobiles, farm implements and other vehicles.
junked appliances, sporting equipment, etc.
Based on national averages, each 1 U. S. citizen discards about 1,500
pounds of solid waste each year.
At this rate, Emmet County produces over 12,000 tons of solid waste each year .
By 1990, the rate
will be 15,200 tons plus discarded waste from tourists who v isit
the County .

•

]

1

More recent national averages indicate that each citizen discards
from six to se v en pounds of solid waste every day . This yields
more than a ton of waste per year (2,300 pounds).

- 18 -

�CENTERS OF TRADE AND COMMUNICATION
Persons who live in rural and unincorporated areas generally depend
upon nearby urban centers (Cities and Villages) for various community services. Hence, it is important for the service center communities to recognize their area-wide roles. For the most part, the
urban centers would have fewer or less adequate serv i ces to offer
were it not for the support of more or less dependent rural areas "
In Emmet County there are several centers of trade and communication
and these vary from one another in terms of size, types of services
and potential for future growth or development. Many of these rural
centers are smaller today than in previous years because of population
out-migration and improved highway access to larger centers such as
Petoskey, Harbor Springs and Cheboygan . Some basic services include:
active recreation, retailing and business services, nonfarm employment, health, education and other services of a social or cultural
nature.
It is not feasible for every Township in Emmet County to
provide all of these services, hence, a natural pattern of urbanrural communication evolves. A key index to the size and influence
of one center over another is the retail base. As~ rule, those
communities which have the highest volume of retail 1ctivity will
also be larger and offer more diverse community wide services o
Although retailing is not the only service of regional importance,
it is a fact that commercial activity is a direct reflection of the
frequency and volume of visits that people in a region make to the
community. Therefore, if people visit the retail center for shopping
purposes, they are likely to patronize such other services as the
post office, library, hospital or a medical office, bank and related
facilities.
In Emmet County, the City of Petoskey has the largest retail-service
influence, and competes effectively on a regional level with centers
as distant as Traverse City and Alpena. The second most influential
County center is the City of Harbor Springs. Of near equal importance,
but influencing the northern portions of the County most is the City
of Cheboygan in adjacent Cheboygan County.
In March, 1969, Emmet County's Commercial Economic Base Analysis was
published under the contract terms of a 11 701 11 Urban Planning Assistance
Granto This report delineated the major retail trade patterns as they
influence Emmet County and communities within the County.
Following
is a summary of findings from the Commercial Base Analysis .
Emmet County has two regional trade areas based upon the retail
potential of Petoskey's downtown shopping area o The primary trade
area was determined to be coterminus with the County boundaries
while the secondary trade area encompasses the County plus the
areas of Charlevoix, East Jordan, Vanderbuilt, Onaway, Mullett
Lake, and Mackinaw City . The larger secondary trade area is based
upon Petoskey's drawing power for major comparison shopping goods
(apparel, furniture, specialty shops, etc.).

- 19 -

�Of the three Counties, Emmet, Charlevoix and Cheboygan, Emmet
County holds a dominant retail position.
Some 43% of the 1963
retail sales in this region occurred in Emmet . Within Emmet
County nearly 76% of the retail sales volume occurred in the City
of Petoskey.
County areas outside of Petoskey which includes
Harbor Springs, increased their share of the total sales between
1958 and 1963.
Using 1963 constant dollar figures, Emmet County's 1958 retail
sales totaled $25.6 million. This increased nearly 1 7% by 1963,
for a total retail sales volume of $29.9 million . During this
same period, the County population increased by less than five
(5) percent.
This is a strong reflection of tourist drawing
power and regional trade area influence.
Population and retail sales trends suggest the high impact of
tourist sales in Emmet County.
From an estimate of "maximumtt
tourist spending, it was concluded that retail sales and services
expenditures attributed to nonpermanent households total some
$13.7 million in 1962. This increased to $22.9 million by 1966
for an overall gain of 67%.
Regardless of the methods employed,
the tourist retail sector of the economy is strong and increasing at a far greater rate than permanent household spending,
Detailed development plans for Petoskey's downtown shopping area
are published in a separate report on the City's retail economic
base. The details for Harbor Springs are also presented in a
separate 1r701n planning program.
Plans for improving the outlying retail areas of Emmet County are contained in the Emmet
County Economic Base report, under the section "Minimum Convenience Centers" . These pertain to the retail areas of Alanson,
Carp Lake, Cross Village, Levering and Pellston .
Retail sales in Emmet County will be distributed among the various
local centers, each serving a slightly different level of retail
activity,
For planning retail service improvements and enlargements, the County's retail centers were classified as follows:
Major Comparison Shopping Center
City of Petoskey
Major Convenience Shopping Centers
Petoskey
Harbor Springs
Mackinaw City

-

20 -

�Minimum Convenience Shopping Centers
Alanson
Carp Lake
Cross Village
Levering
Pellston
Minimum Retail Services (General Store or Larger)
Boyne Highlands - Nubs Nob
Wilderness Park
Larks Lake
Bliss Center
Resort Township

Good Hart
West County Line
Brutus
Epsilon
Stutsmanville

The list of retail centers classified by type is an accurate reflection
of the relative importance of one community over another as a center
for trade, communication and community services, For the most part,
these services are available to the residents of the community center
as well as persons who live in the surrounding Township units of
government .
TABLE 10 briefly lists the distribution of various community services
among selected communities of Emmet County.
Because the data on the
TABLE is derived from several sources, each employing slightly different criteria and prepared at different times, column totals are
not too meaningful. However, the 1963 U. S. Census of Business
reports are based upon consistent data and indicates that 69% of the
County's retail establishments are in the City of Petoskey, 17% in
Harbor Springs and 14% in the Townships and Villages. Tourist lodging facilities present a near opposite picture.
Some 62% of the
County's lodging places are in the Townships and Villages, and 38%
in the two Cities ,
Among the smaller Villages in the County, Alanson, Pellston, Levering,
and Cross Village offer a wider variety of community services, According to area population projections, Alanson has the greatest
potential for improving and expanding retail-community services in
the noncity areas of the County.

J

7

For those communities and County areas that have a projected population loss, and should a future loss become a reality, it is
reasonable to expect future reductions in the quantity and quality
of existing service levels.
Except for Petoskey, Harbor Springs and Mackinaw City, none of the
rural communities and villages provide public water and sewer services (refer to map "Existing Water and Sewer Systems").

- 21 -

�TABLE 10
INVENTORY OF COMMUNITY SERVICES
Emmet County

(l)
(l)

0

cu

(/)

(l)

rl

(/)

P-&lt;

:::&gt;
4-i rl
0 •rl

Selected
Communities
Petoskey

cu

• +'

0

(l)

:z; P:::

bl)

4-i i::
0 •rl
bl)

• 'D
0 0
.....:I

:z;

0

(/)

(/)

rl

•rl

0
0

H

H

H

+'

:s:(l)

..c:

!3

(/)

(/)

(l)

(l)

cu

&gt;

0

:&gt;,

0

H

i::
(l)

0

0

•rl

•rl

+'

(l)
(/)

rl

4-i
4--i

cu

cu

+'

0

0

•rl
rl
.Q
;:::l

•rl
rl
.Q
;:::l

•rl
rl
.Q
;:::l

H

·rl

.Q
•rl

P-&lt;

P-&lt;

P-&lt;

.....:I

::s

P-&lt;

J:y

cu

0

'D
(l)

0

+'
(/)

0

(/)

(l)

H

•rl

218

16

1

1

6

1

4

1

1

Harbor Springs

55

6

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

Alanson

25

1

1

1

1

1

Brutus

4

1

1

Carp Lake

6

5

1

Conway

3

2

1

Cross Village

6

2

Levering

9

5

1

Oden

4

5

1

Pellston

12

2

Mackinaw City
(Emmet Sci.de1:)

15 ~•:

18 1:

Emmet County
SOURCE:

(a)
(b)
(c)

316

58

1

1

2

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

3

13

5

11

6

1

3

Emmet County Land Use Inventory, 1968
U.S. Census of Business, 1963
Harbor Springs Comprehensive Plan, 1969

-

22 -

1

5

�I

~

~

'

\~'

'

,

,

\

\

1'

,

I

~

l

'''' ' ' '
'

1

I

I

'

~

1 1

i

C £CI L

--c
· ...

8 A Y

~•*• •-

--····-····
,.o•T
T. HN,

~

}1

I
I
I
I

t

·-1

I

'
1

I
. I

A. Ill

-·-----t--

STIIRGEON

--~------- -

7F

8

. r··---.
I~ ,
\ I
,..., (iJ .--;:
'~
i:
:
,,

A Y

LJEEb

~J.

~

'

.
,~

::a:

t
I,

'
~

r, ·

·1,

G

L

G

•,

LJ

\

~

_JI

\ 3\

,.

I -·
-'f-- · - +
I

'7
I

II

i~

___ -4

..
---- I: ---..

..

i'

~~

,~

II•

I

"

-

1

" •

·7"'
!

f

u\\

•

\'

1

'

,

•

1

,

jLJl

Ii

ts:

.

!

r:=:1 --hr.: •
s

•

1 -·

~

MC

'

I

N II

:,

.,.

11

,: K

I /

~

E i'l!..
~
ii
!:·: .....
A
...... / I
,, "IF

'

L

.

•~~-

il

') I

n

~F==--

+

I

'&lt;&gt;i"'

.,

"

..

----Jf"''"'""

1

'

=-

= ~_JI

-

. Q

___•

1 ·-·

•

[·
N

,

L

,

•!,

T

f

n

•

" '-

"
✓-~-Jul----

• ..,1ll~

----,---::'c1:-;c••Q,-_
J"•
!'
::,o
li1
"

•

i~

I';_ - .

,;?
rX,
1"

I

~

.. ;

--

~

~

i'\:
~:,
•
,',r········
,,

'" "' ::1#11
":"

I -~
1

~

-~J

~FFJJ.·l.
1

~

l ,

_ ..

7
~□

7n□i
.r7 -

T 3!5N

'I

+

TRA V E RS E

I
I

A

1..

I

-\ ~.~A~~-----,,

~

'

'

I

I
I\ I II
,---~---

l'\_ . ;\~ .
lI

_.j/ '.

T '6N

1,~_iLLLJ~='-- =;,===a~_j

-- --i•1--·-·•~\ '•

.

.....,_]~

Ri

;;

·, ,,

'

1

1, ! • i V !

1

!

__ _ J .

""

.

[JlLJr
,•]C:i...l/ •
•~-

. ~ir-----:'. ~

A.

•

''!° ____ _

"

---- \i
l ' T

'
IEl " . U~( i\\"-~l===u~~'

•

:-=e,,,,:~(I

•

-

,t,.,~ •
t---i~~~l.J..~•·

f,_1/

" --•

r---_T
J[
a l
v E Rsl\~~=~===~y=\'

-· ,I

i.,

8

□··.I~

----• --

"8'

_______

l~I

LIT T LE

,

l.t
---- ---

• '

w

in ---

~

JL

----nr™

·

· _, _.

..

REA

-.J

..

.• J

T 37N

l)
•

=~~~ ~=;r=JL~ •

..

-=t
.. I

'"!""

•JV''" ''"'"

~

,.,.

-~~-

..

• 1''

=-=-'"'L

---------

'[

-

•----

-

"--

·1

-"-- ·

-! _ 1 ·

j ..

..,'

--- ----

-

T-:--~TI·
-'--::::,
·-"
"--

!

.

,,

•---

=----------

i:J .

:

T.!IN.

~ I

.

C--------- I ( ~-

__,j

·--

..

[";

·:

"R

j

-

"

,.

· ~

I

•
•
1
' •p)1----.-----1'
' •! , . .-. r -' .
"i
I. '\,L _ ;,i
• I
.

-,

;~

.'R _,..
p •

□
h_~-t··,~·j'.7'
•.f":l□•E I .' )~-·~.•..
~ !EJ_J•□'. ' •;~~:B

.

'

I

A

•

.,

'

•

"!

ll . .

[3
.

•otu vu.I.Ml'

R

:

gp

II

i

,.

..!' JI

·7··· ·· •'-

G

',··,
· .
i !!

,

''

.

'

iTEt

N

~n ~ 1 \.

,,.y

"-- -11

E

s_1: -------- :

..

,, ·,- 1·
C

'

.

•

•

•--=,

E

u

.

'I--

•

IN

!I

'

~'----•----''---1

-

~

===---i

s

==:=lk=lr-

•

.

:

I

ip=====,=jf

·- A.

•

u

'.

:

'~

,L___ L-\,,-

I

, ,,

'

. , ·

'

V

· -~

~· •

- · ·:·

...,.~...,,

I

I"

. L..i
"---'
""7L_____J

I.........

..

,
D
.·luD- ~□□
~ -J.:10 : , _ ;
l□' ·cC::S:-,--

I.

'

'

•

5
.
.
_
.
Mr:
"
.
~
:
"
Q w.·
N·.. ,. '; r· • :______ _

..._J_

~

~l,

:n ,_ _

l(_ 1 •.
,d ~
CJ
t :
,,--- I .

~

\

f77l
~

"",.
,,,,

1

~I

r

id

I

===t . J,.____.l,._

TREATMENT

1E9E~ -

(_.J-..~
. l~~
-~[j . ~i ";:
A.

--c::,.:&amp;
,0
··~',.~II':,,
· •~
II1 -1r - E r.

_K

·-

·1-·

J1
I
I

I

r-1~.·l;-~":;;~.: : L' I
1

"

11

"

~ ·ti

"

1

..

IO

I

I.

" .

·, [J:::r : ~ -

- -~ -

,.

~

•

I! . \

LEGEND
EXISTING WASTEWl!.TER TREATMENT PLANT
MAJOR SANITARY SEWER LINES
PRESENT SEIIVIC[ IOUNOARIES

' " ' 1"11[1".ll•IITION

or

T'4tS .....

ro1t

HU CW .. [1

COU IIH' ......,o,1a1, C0 IOll $SI0N w•s '1 NUI C[O • .,

I.

I IIAIIT fllO IIII THC f AIUlll (lt°S HO ME •DMU.l!S TIU,110 N,

UNllCO STAT CS tU'A II ' "' ' " t Of 4Glt1CIJL1U•C ttl'O ·71

....

vilican · lemon a 0110c. inc.
plonnin9
con1ultanl1
MC NAMEE PORTER &amp; SEELEY
CONSULTING
ENGINEERS

I

EXISTING SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
EMMET

COUNTY

/"'

C.\LJc1
...
COUNTY

• ••

-

l

(

''ii/ . -.I . L.

R. tW

.

T :S4N

�,

' '
'
'
'
'
'
'
'
''''''''
j

j

1

j

j

C

·-~o ,. .~.~.

l

£CI L

-·· · ·-·

8 A Y

itOIIIT

T, J9N,

~

I
I

..
I

)
I
I
I

-------}--

STURGEON

,,
\I
,,

i

'
I

~-----.
I
I

8 A Y

ii

l

: rmiH~

□"'tRU ~11'.
71~.,- -. -□ l Il'.
~R7f ~a-·- - ·i .:. - - ,[~,I
L

-~

~

'

'
1

I(

-#JI!

'

~

T.'8N.

~

--='=rrffl
-~.□·□·'Ir'-,

'
~
l,

er: rt'lrf.

~□c.x::::::J
. ~~
DD~

'
t

I

I \" ~[

I

~

--;;--~

L _ ..,l ....
~ Q·-[SJ
1

. . E.:~ •□ . .t---ihJ'
'
~
.ill ~1M
\~~-" □·~ \ N
D
r i"' '"
-''
•11_,_l-':1 :..

\
nJ
· -· in-·1
·· . •

,
'-;;:_\

.

.

----

n .

II

I

..

1

~.J

L.J

·

- I ·_·.

.

,

- I -':

- - ~--:,,. ..::.. .L.:... _
ST.7
~I, If-=l r-~- " ·7
.. :
.. L_Jd-~------- - ,"_
• ,_ ,' ---.' :, ,_ L.I ...'
-·-,,

· »··

..

-

T-~'---,_L_
""""....,.
·' J _

.. .

'

II

j---~-\,~t-7: .' ;-

. ,c . • • :

J

•

•

r==L___=~u_.:::::

•

'1

I

.-;11r;·
I --.---~..:, " ' •::.-----' ' ---,-- • •

•
· •·--

~c i K

i"

T . 37N.

~

1

i -_

: -

~, , , "· .

n"""

..

I

~

_~1b,_-'--s~1~1···~~
k -==11

_IFl.[I_···:···~ .

-~-- i .
F

=~-·J-17'

\:

•

-

\

--1

m

I

1

-

Ii

,

1· . . . (

·J td

:I -

,.'

C -

II -

I

• -

'

/.

VTII , '.'\¼-f. .
,,,. j

./.§--ir~ :i i. ji ' " :, __ ,.,....,..~ Os
~rT~);
I ~IDJ
' . ' \·[r=""1ii
-~•
•
_.
:
,
_
__J
•,
□
~
~L__
j
:
,
i
:·
EJ·
•
□
·~I·□\
\-_
~:'
.
:-J~:tL
" ~•
·· "1 -- ,,-, ,....~,----•-·"•·- --~- . ___"___ ________J. •-"'r, •,. , w~~
11' , r l

"
,. .
LJLJ
-~~" ~~
ou··. Lb!"' :, Jo'~□·.f\□i ,~-J- .. "
□• " .~
f: •
J ~
c' 10
R. Lul
Rl~ , :,.(
:1~t£ll
.. "' Cl k~l 17 '· -~,. ____,,,
..

·-

[''r····... ····;:1

···~,,

1 ~ •
,,t:

.

1··

JJ

•

I' ' '
0

1

A

'

N

•

wt

_'

v

'

~

--

I

• I ~,

-

--

, - 11

-- C""..·11

-- ll •

~- _

'I

\I ,morn H\fLET

i.

1

"- ,

EJ~ ' ----- ' -----

~ ~'. ··,~

\R •

'r"&lt;
1\ _ S

,--

1~

j

E

~n

~

~

·

L

•

11 ~ , L - '

1

..

ii E

;===cc!-

i

\

-

\i

,,

L

□ -···i-·s--~,-ic\1
:: ,:

./

I,, - .. -

i

,:-

l \\

. • I r:1 ·

:

~

\I. _

_

"

"~

'

,. . ,L_jLJ[_

~\L,__&lt;L.J

-----s:~Pm--H--

~!/..--·'· ....

:J --- "\,. , ,,.

C: I

j

----- I

"

,---·-

,

·

)- ·:-

. r··· ····'-···
.!\.--~••\ !i~
'
s.\:;====:7]r'
:,
I
i' 'l

E

E

r ~- -·- · "'I
![ . [ .
71 Q Jl.:J

Q 11/ ;·-~-·L
. -j~-----··
,
~__J, '""' ,
DL__
'
,, .
••• :•
A V

,

1:

T. 31N

M . AI

, L '",,,,___J .

!!- j

I . .

j L.,.o

--f=:J□ -

I.:

no
·,,
. ··i'\ .

"{

llrTL£

-J

T 3'N

~~~-

TRAVERS£

.........

8 A r

L
~l

ii

... .......,

.I IB :,,: '
:=J5J

!•

~

. I .

. '

LJ
lo=14~lf CljDDn
'c
-~
·~.

'~

J ···

___j._

-~,.

JOU

E

.

A

R

I

. --~.
I
I

;'

_

..

.

•

,

"

"

"

•

• ow

.nl:rl · . ~ ~·
:

1

--~,:1

'IT"""

:

~

•

or

TOIi$ " " "

tOlt TH(

CO tilllll /SSION ..

T,1[ rAIINt:ll 'li

·•-

-

~

-

EXISTING WELLS
EXISTING STORAGE WITH CAPACITY

(t,l lll (T

,1.0JIIIIMISUt4Tl0W •

or ,_,l1111C1,1UUNt:

ltl0 •11

.....
l ( A\.(

I ll

,c1n

vilicon · lemon a ossoc. inc.
planning
con,ultonts
MCNAMEE PORTER &amp; SEELEY
CONSULTING ENGINEERS

•

..

I

I,

•

ll

-"

:----1,7

I

.

•

•

,s n1t1o1o1cto ., "

" 01,U.

:

tr
'r

!

I

.;::'

_.!_
"'-""'"''"o

:·

r.

•

LEGEND

l'IUl'•IIIIAIIO"'

) ~

~□,o·

~..-.

MAJOR WATER MAINS
EXISTING SERVICE AREAS

TN(

~•1

,o

•

I

~

~
.~

//

[

..

~-,... ·I-cr:£1-~ L~b
....

1,;----,

UNIUO IT&amp;TII OIP.,.IITNINT

l,

SPRINGVALE

I
I

"

CHARLE VOIX

G U1N T JltO ..

,

•

~

COUtHT

.,-. ~1ttJ-lJ
f0

~I
~((_
~ ~
•··-·· [ .......,.~.... . ·--. .. _j ..l
·•t

•

-!~

•

-

I

~

1

•

I

"

L_=.__-E

.~

L.1

u

I

EXISTING COMMUNITY WATER SERVICE
EMMET

COUNTY

~

.I

\

COUNTY

~

T 34N

�,

-

NATURAL RESOURCES

(PART I A. 4.)

Emmet County has a diverse resource base that is well adapted to yearround recreation attractions.
This fact, plus the increasing accessibility of the County to tourists from metropolitan centers will cause
accelerated development pressures on the existing resource base. The
momentum of rising tourism, crowded metropolitan centers, new highways, and improved air service may well precipitate local development
related to industrialization and factors other than tourism recreation.
The cumulative impact of the County's latent growth potential will be
accompanied by an urbanization process that will be paralleled by resource depletion . Hence, community water and sewer systems must be
provided to minimize the negative aspects of development . Wood lots
will be converted to building sites, farm lands to neighborhoods, and
lake, river, and stream frontages subdivided in lots . The character
of the County is under pressure to change and as a minimum it will
take community water-sewer systems, good zoning and subdivision control ordinances to assure the most satisfactory patterns of use and
development.
Generally, the processes of urban growth and development results in
the displacement of an area's natural environment. Game habitates,
fishing streams, wooded areas, and farms are displaced by highways,
housing developments, commercial uses and industry. Whether or not
it is feasible to accommodate urban growth and still retain the basic
natural environment remains a challenge to society.
It is known, however, that the continuing pressures of urban growth are placing even
greater demands upon resources which are within commuting distance of
metropolitan centers.
Emmet County's natural resource base must be viewed as an important
element of the ecological structure of Michigan and the Upper Midwest.
Deer hunting, fishing, natural scenery, other outdoor recreation,
and clean waters represent major factors in the local economy and
are attractions which account for the increasing demands upon the
rural environment. As more freeways develop north from Chicago and
Detroit, the impact of urban growth on the County can be expected to
increase substantially.
While it will not be possible to resolve all the County's ecological
and environmental questions in a planning study, it is an objective
of the plan to suggest development patterns that will recognize the
mutual needs of urban uses and the natural resource base.
Implementating the development patterns will be an evolving long-term program
necessitating strong cooperation among citizens of the County, resource
specialists, land developers and government.

-

23 -

�Some selected natural resources of concern in Emmet County are deer
yards, trout streams, warm water fish streams, canoeable rivers and
principal drainage basins. As a general observation, deer yarding
areas, canoeable waters and the quality trout streams are concentrated
in nearly the same County locations. These resource areas also provide habitat for other game species native to Northern Michigan.
Hence, efforts to preserve these areas in their natural state will
fulfill numerous conservation objectives including a quality outdoor
recreational environment for future generations.
The drainage patterns on the map relate rivers and streams to their
principal watershed areas . It is important that land users in the
County recognize these drainage patterns as certain activities may
contribute to stream pollution or resource depletion. The County
cannot afford these losses if it is to retain the Northern image so
attractive to urban populations which tour the United States.
SOILS
The accompanying 11 Soil Resources 11 map illustrates a refinement of the
County's Land Type map, and presents ten (10) relatively homogenous
soil groups. These soil classifications are based upon their general
physical similarity.
Soils in a group have similar capacity to sustain urban uses and resources development. This map gives a broad
picture of the distribution and comparative quantity of County soil
resources.
Because of the generalized nature of the mapped information,
it is applicable to County planning as an overall development guide or
reference, More detailed soils surveys and/or on-site investigations
are needed for specific uses and site planning.
In determin~ng the general suitability of soils in their natural state
for various uses, the following criterion are applied by soil scientists
of the U.S. Soil Conservation Service:
1.
2,
3.
4.

Adaptability
Adaptability
Adaptability
Adaptability

for
for
for
for

Agriculture
Housing (subdivision type)
Woodland and Forest Use
Recreation

A summary rating of the ten (10) generalized Soil Resource Areas is
presented on TABLE 11.
It is pertinent that about 70% of the area of Emmet County has soil
conditions that are suited to urban development uses.
This also
implies a general suitability for forestry, agriculture and recreation.

-

24 -

�' '

~

1

.

1

~

...

"I

'I

1 1J 1 i

i

•

i

'

i

'

,

i i

'

,1

1

i

I

1 1 1

C E CI L

STURGEON

8 A

r

~

'l(:,

t
(,

t

l
i• ~ l . ;:
.
[Ju.L__j
----- -----J~s&gt;-----

•

71. . . \, .

"'
"
"
L I TT l. £

TRAVERSE

8

A

r

rl
tr

~f~

·rt,
.
~-:... r . ,
~

•

If

• I.I

·-

11

.

1
~~~~L_ ltLJ,
,~
~

GR OU PS

I

'TH( •11•11 ... TlOOI 0, 1..1 WU ''"'""°°'4U
•10tllllMCk&gt;ONAUOfUl.OU... l!fO,ooTOfl'l&gt;IPIIIIMl! .. I
Of H0USttl0AHOIIUAHl&gt;t¥!10,,._l,.I. 1/l'fOU TH( Ill

ilfr:E::rf::::::·:~:~f2!;~::::.

.....
Generalized
vilicon · lemon a ouoc. inc .
plonn l nQ

con sultonta

ISOIL
EMMET

RESOURCES

COUNTY

COUNTY

EMMET SANDY L OAM

a

LOAMY SAND

2
3
4
5
6

ST. IGNACE· LON GR IE - ALPENA

7

DUNE

8
9
IQ

BLUE LAKE - LEELANAU
EA S T LAKE - BLUE LAKE - KALKASKA
RUBICON

SANO

EAST LAKE - AU GRES

LANO - DEER PARK

BRIMLE Y- BRUCE -WAI NOLA

IOSCO - THOMAS

BREVORT

CARBONDALE - TAWAS - ROSCOMMON

SOURCE : U. S . SOtL CONSERVATION

SERVICE

�TABLE 11
COUNTY SOIL RESOURCES
Emmet County

Agriculture
Good

Subdividing

L

Sandy Loam

2.

Loamy Sand

Fair-Good

Good

3.

Deep Loamy Sand

Fair-Good

Good

4.

Deep Acid Sands

Poor

5.

Sand and Gravel

6.

Use Rating or Adaptability
Recreation-Woodland

Drainage

Good

Good

Hardwoods and Pine

Good

Good

Hardwoods and Pine

Good

Good

Good-Fair

Poor

Good

Poor

Fair-Good

Poor

Fair-Poor

Fair

Sand Gravel over
Bedrock

Poor

Fair-Poor

Poor

Fair-Poor

Poor

7.

Sand Dunes

Poor

Poor

Poor

8.

Silts, Clays, Sand

Poor

Poor

Fair

Fair-Good

Poor

9•

Silty Clay Loam

Poor

Poor

Poor

Fair-Good

Poor

Organic Soil

Poor

Poor

Poor

Game Habitat

Poor

Good

Hardwoods

Fair-Good

N

u,

10.

SOURCE:

U.S. Soil Conservation Service, Boyne City, Michigan

Good

Good

�Resort and Bear Creek Townships have from 85% to 90% of their lands
in soils suited to urban development. This is important because these
communities are expected to absorb most of the projected urban development in the County.
It · is unfortunate that soils rated very good for
farming and forestry may be displaced by development in the Petoskey
area.
Vast land areas in the central and west central portions of Emmet
County are well suited for urban and recreation development.
This
means that ski chalets and summer home development can proceed with
few soil limitations. However, there are other planning considerations
necessary to assure that new developments do not destroy the quality
of the natural environment which generates demands for use~and development. Deer yarding areas and sport fishing streams will need protection.
Crooked Lake, Pickerel Lake and the Crooked River Valley through Alanson are positioned among wet soils rated fair to poor for urban use.
Since this is an intensive resort-cottage area, pollution control
measures will become increasingly necessary and a strong need is already apparent.
The Cross Village area is divided among several soil types:
sandy
loams, loose sand and organic soils. The organic soils are generally
in State ownership and hence, may not be a development problem.
However, the loose sands, which occur in dunes and ridges have many development limitations in terms of drifting sand (wind, erosi~n) and difficulty in establishing and maintaining cover.
Development of these
soils will reduce the high scenic value of the area, as many dunes
will be leveled and existing tree stands will be gradually reduced.
The Mackinaw City area and Wawatam Township are on limeston~ formations
and cobbly soils.
These are generally unsuitable for urban•development in their natural state.
Careful and detailed soils analysis can
reveal the nature of development limitations on particular sites.

A

large proportion of the soils unsuited for development are in the
north areas of the County. Also, much of this land is currently in
State of Michigan ownership, as part of the Hardwood State Forest.

- 26 -

�TOPOGRAPHY
The accompanying topography map illustrates the slope characteristics
of Emmet County's natural landscape.
From a County-wide view, there
is a great deal of variety in land formations, which include:
flat
lands, gently rolling, rolling to steep, and very steep slopes.
Elevation gradually increases from north to south, with some of the
highest hilltops in Pleasantview and Springvale Townships.
The discussion which follows describes the topographic characteristics
of each Township in the County. As a general statement, there are a
number of areas that have limitations to development in terms of
urban density development. However, these limitations become scenic
attractions in communities that cater to tourism-recreation activities.
Resort

Topography in Resort Township is gently rolling
with picturesque contrasts between cultivated farm
land and patches of wooded area.
Some steep landscape follows the Lake Michigan Shoreline, mostly
in the Penn-Dixie mining area.

Bear Creek

- Land forms in Bear Creek Township tend to be more
severe than in Resort.
From a development point of
view, it is well that the incidence of steep topography lies well south and southeast of Petosk~y and
can be avoided by expanding urban development.
Some
10 sections of land are affected by steep topography.

Springvale

- Except for areas generally within two miles of Crooked
Lake, Pickerel Lake, and the Minihaha Creek Valley,
Springvale Township is influenced by steep slopes.
Not all of this area can be considered prohibitive
to development, but it does present some severe
limitations.
The flat areas around the lakes are
separated from rolling lands by a large band of
steep slope area,

Littlefield

- Topography has almost no development limitation
on this community.
Some moderate to steep slopes
exist in the extreme northwest area.

Little Traverse - The southern tiers of sections in this Township are
generally flat or gently rolling, although incidences
of steep slope are present. A large area of steep ·
topography affects the eight sections in the northeast area,
West Traverse

- Topography in West Traverse Township varies from
rolling to steep and is steep in most sections.
The rolling and gently rolling land is found north
of Harbor Springs and east to the Township line.

- 27 -

�Friendship

- Except for some areas near Stutsmanville and Middle
Village, Friendship is characterized by moderately
steep to steep topography.
Other incidences of flat
and gently rolling land is scattered among the steeper
slope lands.

Pleasantview

- A band of flat land extends north-south through this
community.
Steep to very steep topography is found
in the southwest and southeast areas, where the Boyne
Highlands and Nubs Nob ski resorts are located. Moderate to steep slopes are found in the northwest and
northeast sections.

Maple River

The west one-third of this community has moderate to
moderately steep topography but few steep areas.
The
land character in the east sections is flat with some
incidence of swamp.

McKinley

- McKinley Township has a varied land character.
Extensive swamp land is positioned along the east line
and flat but drier sections extend along the south.
Some nine sections in the northwest portion are
moderately rolling, with very little incidence of
steep,

Center

- Rolling to moderate slope areas are found in the extreme northeast sections, while moderately steep to
steep topography influences a large area in the southwest. A wide band of flat land (high incidence of
swamp) traverses the community from southeast to
northwest.

Readmond

- Readmond Township's physiography resembles Friendship. Most of the landscape is characterized by
moderately steep slopes and there are incidences of
steep.
Gently rolling and moderate slopes are found
in the north and west areas and in the sections near
Good Hart.
There is considerably more developable
land along Lake Michigan in Readmond than in Friendship.

Cross Village

- Steep topography is limited to the Mccort Hill area
in Section 5 and in portions of Sections 2 and 3.
A steep ridge parallels the shore of Lake Michigan
from the south to the Wycamp Lake area,
Rolling
sand dunes are found in the northern sections.

- 28 -

�Bliss

- Bliss Township is predominantly flat with incidences
of swamp.
Some moderately steep landscape is located in the central, south and southeast area.
Incidences of steep slope can be found near Bliss
Center and among the sand dunes along Lake Michigan.

Carp Lake

- Gently rolling to moderately rolling topography is
present in the southwesterly seven and one-half
(7 1/2) sections. The remainder of the community
is relatively flat and there are swamp lands to the
southwest and northwest.

Wawatam ·

- Overall, Wawatam Township has the flattest topography
in Emmet County.
The topography map reveals only a
gradual fall in elevation from the southeast to
north Township Line.

The foregoing analysis of the County's physiography is limited in respect to detail.
U.S.G,S. data on a County-wide scale at the 20 foot
contour interval is effective as a general reference for slope data,
but cannot illustrate the variety of slope change that can occur within a given 20 foot interval.

DRAINAGE PATTERNS
In addition to indicating slope, topography defines the surface drainage pattern of the County. This information is useful in water-sewer
system planning, because the drainage pattern influences the extension
of sanitary sewer mains. Whenever a topographic barrier is encountered,
there are specific construction costs related to the following:
excess pipe to circumvent the barrier.
lift stations, force mains and booster pumps to overcome a change
in elevation.
costly excavations to maintain satisfactory grades on the collector
mains.
possible need for duplicate treatment facilities (lagoons, plants,
etc.).
additional time needed for installation of the system.
Following are some general observations relative to sanitary sewer
service areas based upon the County's principal drainage pattern:
A sewage system in Pellston would have the physical capacity to
serve a large regional area.
Pellston is also a potential industrial area.

-

29 -

�,
Alanson is reasonably well situated to serve a large·drainage area.
Although new industry may be limited, recreation, tourists, and
year-round home demands will be significant.
Poor soils and flat
terrain suggest a serious need for urban services in the Alanson,
Oden, Crooked Lake area.
Large areas of Bear Creek Township fall within the natural drainage
pattern of Petoskey's sewage collection and treatment system . However, east Pickerel Lake and East Mitchell Roads lie in another
drainage basin .
Most of Resort Township's drainage pattern lies in basins which do
not run toward Petoskey. Natural drainage is in the direction of
Walloon Lake .
Harbor Springs has a large drainage area, Hence, the City can be
analyzed as a source of sewage treatment for surrounding Township
areas that are urbanizing.
Cross Village is positioned just south of the dividing line of two
drainage basins.
The northernmost areas of Emmet County lie in two principal basins;
Bliss Township is in the westerly basin and WaWatam Township is
easterly. Carp Lake and Wawatam Townships are largely in the Carp
River basin. The Village of Mackinaw City is in a sub-basin.
All of the drainage basins on the map reflect large overall drainage
patterns . Within each there are small sub-basins that would affect
the detailed engineering of specific community sewage collection
systems.
WATER RESOURCES
In Emmet County, a prime use of water resources is for recreation,
mainly in terms of swimming, boating, fishing and wildlife management.
Howev er, water resources are necessary for municipal water systems,
individual wells for domestic water and irrigation . Hence, it is
essential that the County's water resources are protected from pollution and depletion.
Lake Michigan is a major water reserve for recrea~ion as well as municipal water supplies in the Petoskey area. Municipal water in Harbor
Springs is obtained from ground sources via four wells .
For the most
part, the r emaining County areas rely on individual wells .
On the basis of general state-wide data prepared by the Water Resources
Commission of the Michigan Department of Natural Resources, most of
the area of Emmet County is in glacial deposit areas with fairly high
yields of ground water.
The lower yield areas are found mostly in
Resort Township, Wawatam Township and northern Bliss Township . However, individual wells in specific locations may have high or low
yields depending on local geologic conditions.
- 30 -

�In addition to Lake Michigan and ground water resources, community
water systems may be developed from rivers and smaller lakes.
Emmet
County has seven (7) inland lakes, of which three are positioned in
urban growth areas (Round Lake, Crooked Lake and Pickerel Lake). Also,
the U. S. Soil Conservation Service has identified nine (9) potential
water impoundment locations on the rivers of the County.
For the most
part, surface water resources other than Lake Michigan, would only be
of use in recreation-resort locations, and detailed engineering
feasibility will be necessary to determine the suitability of any
surface water for domestic consumption.
Some discussion of the quality of domestic water resources is contained
in Part III of this "Sewer and Water Plan'' report .

- 31 -

�AGRICULTURE, LAND PATTERNS, AND TRENDS : (PART I A. 5.)
Farming and agricultural activities have two major influences on each
community. First is the income derived for rural families and other
services that are supported by farming.
Second is the value of farms
as a resource for open space, wildlife support, and environmental
breaks with developed urban areas.
Farming has become a highly complex operation requiring skilled operators and huge investments in mechanical equipment and land.
This
is evidenced by the fact that the average value of farms in Emmet
County increased 135% between 1954 and 1964. Also, the character of
farming i s moving in two directions, one of increasing farm acreage
and the other toward intensive farming where crops are scientifically
managed to include complete climate control. Over and above this is
the influx of artificial foods; items developed through laboratory
chemistry.
Part of the national trend in agriculture can be observed from TABLE
12, which summarizes selected farm data for Emmet County.
In the 10
years between 1954 and 1964, the average size of a farm increased by
nearly 50 acres or 32% , Overall, there was a 51% decrease in the number of farms in the County.
Employment also decreased markedly .
In
1950, the U.S . Census listed 632 persons employed as farmers and -farm
managers.
By 1960, this occupation group declined to 228 for a percentage loss of 64% .
While farm size has been increasing and the number of farms and total
acreage has been decreasing, farm production has been increasing along
with the average value per farm.
This is a good index of the economic
advantages of the large scale farm and why this trend is taking place.
Better and more productive yields are taking place.
TABLE 13 shows the value of farm products
1959, the value has increased nearly 38%,
State of Michigan.
The trend since 1954,
as there was a decline from 1954 to 1959,
and 1964.

sold in Emmet County .
Since
compared with 23% for the
however, is not as optimistic
and an increase between 1959

Of the two categories, livestock and corps, it is evident that livestock farms are most valuable.
Between 1959 and 1964, livestock farm
product sales increased $528,000 compared with $208,000 for crops.
Dairy and poultry were the most important growth factors, as other
livestock increased slightly.
Field crops accounted for over 60% of the sales increase among crops.
Forest products and vegetables gained some, while fruits and nuts
experienced sales decreases,

- 32 -

�TABLE 12
SELECTED FARM CHARACTERISTICS
Emmet County

Farms by Size
1 - 99 acres
100 - 499 acres
500 - 999 acres
1,000 acres and over
Totals

Land in Farms
% of County Land in Farms
Average size of Farms
Average Value of Farms
Farm Operators residing
on farm

Farm Census
1964
1954
382
439
13
3

145
247
17
4

-237
-192
+ 4
+ 1

-

837

413

-424

-

51%

123,478

80,841

-

35%

42%

27%

148
acres

196
acres

+ 32%
acres
+136%

$ 16,698

+$9,680

512

389

-123

1,682

U.S. Census of Agriculture

- 33 -

62%
44%
+ 31%
+ 33%

+ 48
acres

$ 7,019

Persons in Farm Operator
households

SOURCE:

1954 to 1964
Change
No.
%

-

24~

�TABLE 13
VALUE OF FARM PRODUCTS SOLD
Emmet County

All Products Sold
Farm Average
Crops

1954

1959

1964

$1,715,495

$1,311,707

$2,071,272

1,943

2,484

5,015

834,220

451,066

659,119

338,828

243,963

381,121

a.

Field Crops

b.

Vegetables

25,848

33,390

55,832

c.

Fruits and Nuts

28,744

30,376

15,751

d.

Forest Products

440,800

143,337

206,415

881,275

860,641

1,389,415

61,540

34,715

261,994

Livestock
a.

Poultry

b.

Dairy

561,606

390,355

651,230

c.

Livestock

258,129

435,571

476,191

SOURCE:

1964 and 1959 United States Census of Agriculture, U.S.
Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census, Vol . 1, Part
13, Michigan.

- 34 -

�A final assessment of the value of agriculture to Emmet County can be
established from a general rule of thumb, that each dollar earned in
farming turns over about 2.3 times. Hence, the $2.07 million produced
from farm sales in the County has an estimated multiplied impact of
some $4,761,000.
This is a significant local economic factor that
should be retained to the fullest extent possible .
In Emmet County, owner occupied farm trends may be estimated from data
on farm operators residing on farms.
The 1964 Census of Agriculture
showed that 94% of the County's farm operators resided on the farm.
Also, the average farm supports a resident population of 4.07 persons,
well above the average County household size of 3 , 33 persons.
The fu ture of agriculture in Emmet County is uncertain, because of
national events and local pressures for land that may or may not
occur. The trend, however, shows farm acreage declining, and farm
population declining.
However, the value and size of a farm is increasing.
It is reasonable to conclude that the value of farm land will increase
as a result of tourist demands for rural land.
This will cause farm
acreage to decline further, lessening the impact of agriculture as an
economic activity (employer).
Farm productivity may decline as well .
On the other hand, national-international demands for farm products
may give new economic incentives for preserving and expanding vital
agricultural activity.
In terms of the relative importance of agriculture, Emmet County
ranked 57th among the 82 counties in farm product sales. Hence, 57
counties are agriculturally more significant. Another index shows
that Emmet County has a high percentage of nonfarm income to supplement farm product sales (17th of 82). This is an index showing decreasing reliance upon farming activity for basic income.
LAND PATTERNS
The a c companying map illustrates the generalized existing land use
pattern in Emmet County. TABLE 14 summarizes the acreages and proportions of uses by Township areas and City-Village areas. APPENDIX
TABLES 1 and 5 present the detailed land use acreages for each community with totals for the principal Supervisory Districts.
It is
noted that whenever City-Village data is statistically portrayed,
only that portion of Mackinaw City, which lies in Emme t County, is
included . No land use data for the Cheboygan side has been tabulated,
however, it was inventoried and mapped. Also, data for Petoskey and
Harbor Springs were taken from land use studies prepared for those
communities under separate planning programs.

- 35 -

�-

-

-'
0
0

"

u

~

"
...
►

..
.... " ..;:;i
... ..
-'

.."'

+'
,r,

::,

~

"'

!

.."
..
-'

0

~
.J

z

0

...

..
" "'"' .,.!. z
..,
:
:, "
"
0

4iif"

.,

ID

:,

~

:,

0
:,:

~

..,

.J

;::

+'
~

¥"

z
2

~

I-

"'a:

w

.,0 "'ua:"

..

a:

0

"'u
:::;

..
ID

:,

.
QII

&lt;..,

0

0

0

'-I

,-

4

2

◄

j

;:

.."
...
..
4

z

"

@)

::,

....

"

0

...►

►

2

::,
0

"z
:;

u

.,
0

z

&lt;(

.J

u
.J

..

ID

:,

.,
"'a: "'..,a:

IIll
0
IL

..

.J
&lt;(

;:;
a:

.J

::!

a:

u
I"' :::; "" .,
., "' ::,0
:,
"'2 ;!,
.,
I&lt;(

I-

..

□~II~

~

¥'
,-

-

w

en

+"

:::)

~
r
¥"
...

0

z

~

&lt;t
_J

~

"'"'

¥"'

"'

J

,_

"'...

.,

.."'

,._

¥"'

"'

....

..

&gt;(!)~

..

z~

i=u

"'

l.:w" '

"....

Cf)t-

...

·: □

-1&amp;.1

X::E

-11--.11--

tr

,

~=:

..
+'

,,...

...

.

co.

~ /;;,:·:~)\

~

.... -

cl.
:)rr
Q-,,

z-""

J
:

.

•

I

.

~= .

.

W C

~ L

•'

:IE:
a

"" ~(~ ~
·"'&gt;r--i
~d___j •

,.:J

""

w!

~
~

/
. , ....i

/

,.

-► --'fl"

3

)I

7

•

§ ~

.
"

C

�TABLE 14
EXISTING LAND USE
Emmet County

All To'wnshiE..§_
Residential

703 acres

To·t al Counti
2,094 acres

Percent
DeveloEed Total
9.1%

778

37

815

3. 6%

Public

2,357

154

2,511

10.9%

Quasi-Public

2,754

301

3,055

13.4%

Recreation

7,372

206

7,578

33.1%

Commercial

203

129

332

1.5%

Industrial

429

114

543

2.4%

Railroads

374

102

476

2.1%

4,830

635

5,465

23.9%

Seasonal Homes

w

1,391 acres

· Cities g Villa~es

0)

Roads
Total Uses

Vacant, Farm g
Forest
Surface Water
GRAND TOTAL

20,488 acres

2,381 acres

22,869 acres

100.0%

7 . 8%

2 58,932

3,453

262,415

88.9%

9,485

301

9,756

3 . 3%

2 88,905 acres

6,135 acres

295,040 acres

100 . 0 %

�Inventory Techniques
The study of land use in the Comprehensive Plan has several objectives
related to understanding the County's present development and guiding
future planning decisions.
Foremost, the land use inventory provides
both a graphic and statistical picture of the County, emphasing the
impact of man-made features.
The inventory of existing land use was accomplished by field inspections, conducted during the summer of 1968. Each use of land was
recorded on field maps and later transcribed to base maps. The field
inspection technique is not 100% accurate since all uses in buildings
are not apparent from the street and there may be uses in wooded areas
and on large private properties generally inaccessible by vehicle.
Common limitations are accurate counts of apartments within multiple
family dwellings and seasonal homes in forested areas.
Overall,
however, the field inspection technique is a valuable means of assessing the character of uses, and it consumes less time and cost than
other inventory systems (such as reviewing all tax records or photographic interpretation). Nevertheless, aerial photographs, U. S.G.S .
maps, and interviews of local officials were used to resolve questions
on property usage.
It should also be noted that the use of land
changes continually in all communities, hence, the data must be v iewed
in terms of the date inventoried.
Use Classifications
Because there are many and varied uses of property in Emmet County,
it is necessary to calssify them into meaningful groups. This is
essential to assist in analyzing the information as well as to
simplify understanding the total picture .
Following is a list of how the County land uses were classified:
Residential

- Includes three separate categories:
One-family
dwellings, two-family dwellings, and dwellings
with three or more units.
Cottages and seasonal
homes were also inventoried.

Commercial

- For ease of statistical analysis, all retail and
business uses are grouped into one category. However, each use was inventoried and it is possible
to show shopping center uses, tourist lodging and
general commercial activities .

Industrial

- Identifies manufacturing industries, welding services, machine shops, cabinet shops, saw mills and
similar uses primarily involving the production,
processing and fabrication of goods . Also, warehouses, truck terminals, enclosed and open storage,
junk yards, bulk fuel depots, gravel pits, contractor yards, lumber yards and similar activities .

-

37 -

�Public

Quasi-Public

- All governmental uses and buildings including schools.
Includes municipal offices, hospitals, D.P.W. garages
and yards, fire stations, community buildings, libraries, post offices, the County Airport, public
cemeteries and similar uses.
Includes uses which are semipublic in nature, such
as:
churches, parochial schools, fraternal lodges,
utility substations, private cemeteries, Country
Clubs, Ski Resorts, private parks, radio and TV
Towers, etc.

Parks

- Public recreation uses, including parks, public access sites, playgrounds, roadside parks, campgrounds
and related.
Includes the Petoskey and Wilderness
State Parks, but not State Forest Land.

Streets and
Railroads

- Includes alleys, streets, roads, highways and railroads in use as of the summer of 1968.

Water

- All principal bodies of surface water including the
measurable waters of the Crooked River.
Lake
Michigan harbor waters are not included.

Vacant, Farm
and Forest

- Encompasses unused open land in tracts or lots, farm
land except dwelling areas, and forested areas.

Emmet County's total area is 461 square miles, which is equivalent to
295,040 acres.
Of this area, less than eight percent is used for housing, business, industry, community services, recreation and transportation. Another three percent is in major surface water area, including inland lakes and the Crooked River.
Some 88.9% of the County
is land classified as vacant, farm and forest,
Lands in vacant, farm
and forest are most apt to be consumed by other uses as the County
grows.
Soils, topography, land ownership and the economic strength of
farming will determine those lands that will be consumed first.
As an illustration of existing County development, all of the County's
roads, highways, railroads, parks, airports, and other land uses, except farmed or forested land could roughly fit into the area of one
Township (McKinley for example). That is if all of the urban uses
and services were concentrated. However, every community has varying
amounts of development and uses are widely scattered throughout .
At the present time, the Cities and Villages of the County have over
3,453 acres of undeveloped land.
If future permanent housing were to
concentrate in Village-City areas where central utility services may
be available or could be provided, the County could absorb nearly
8,000 new families without losing one acre of farm land. The Township's of course have vast areas of open land that could be developed.

- 38 -

�POTENTIAL FOR RECREATION AND TOURISM
The potentials for recreation and tour•ism in Emmet County must be
viewed in terms of the position of the County in Michigan, and the
availability of quality resources and existing recreation developments designed to accommodate tourists .
Situated in the northern most portion of the Lower Peninsula, Emmet
County has landscape features and environmental characteristics which
differ significantly from down state areas.
This of itself is a
major attraction force, as people from crowded metropolitan areas
travel northward to benefit from cooler climatic conditions, cleaner
outdoor air and unpolluted waters. To the extent that these resources
can be protected from despoliation, the transient tourist economy will
continue to grow at a rapid pace.
Regional Potentials
Millions of people live within a days drive from Emmet County, and
the trip becomes easier and safer as freeway construction continues
northward.
Tourists in Emmet County travel from many states and
foreign countries, but are primarily from Michigan, Ohio, Indiana
and Illinois. Regional access is provided by freeways, highways,
airports and the Great Lakes waterways.
Resource Potential
The resources of Emmet County were described in previous sections of
this report. However, the greatest potential for tourism-recreation
is related to the waters of Lake Michigan. Winter tourist visitation
is enhanced by major ski resorts developed among prominent topographic
features.
Hence, topography, climate and water oriented recreation
combine favorably in the County and improved regional access (I-75)
permits increased patronage. At this writing, some undeveloped
shoreline remains along Lake Michigan and on some inland lakes o If
these areas are "walled off" by development, the general potential
for tourism-recreation will be more restricted.
It is recommended
that the sand dune areas north of Cross Village be included in a
public recreation area. This will prevent an outstanding resource
area from the ravages of soil erosion and septic tank pollution .
The inherent recreation values of resources in the County reflect
the continued losses and depletion of resources in metr' opoli tan areas.
Strong efforts will be needed to establish water and sewer serv ices
in resource areas where recreation home development may threaten the
quality of lakes, streams and ground water.

-

39 -

�Cultural Potential
Emmet County has a history rich with cultural interest . The history
of the Indian community is colorful and relates closely with miss'ionary
activities in the region. This is substantiated by the numerous
monuments and historical markers throughout the County . Fort Michilmackinac is another major historical-cultural feature that attracts
thousands of visitors annually.
Efforts are now underway to establish an Indian Cultural Center north of Petoskey. If effectively
implemented, this center could become a major attraction feature for
tourists and at the same tj~e provide cultural educational services,
Economic Potential
If tourism-recreation is to have its full potential realized, there
must be provision for private investment. A major investment in yearround tourism development is Boyne Highlands.
Some other significant
private investments in tourism-recreation include:
Nubs Nob Ski Resort;
Country Clubs; Bay View Association; Harbor Point Association;
Wequetonsing Association; Hidden Hamlet and similar recreation home
developments; marinas; campgrounds; fee fishing ponds; and numerous
motel-hotel accommodations throughout the County.
Based on the Commercial Economic Base Analysis for Emmet County, total
tourist spending in fiscal 1962 - 1963 was estimated at about $13 . 7
million . This increased by about 50% through 1966-1967, for a total
volume of about $20.0 million. As long as metropolitan growth continues as in the past, increases of this magnitude can be expected
to continue .
Using established rates, tourist spending has been increasing at about
16% annually . If the trend continues, tourist spending may reach some
$140,000,000 by 1990. This reflects strong and continuing gains in
the tourist economy of Emmet County.
TRENDS IN COMMERCIAL USES
As a general land use standard commercial uses in urban communities
make up about three (3) percent of the developed land area,
In
Emmet County, the percentage of commercial land is 1.5%, However,
these two figures are not fully comparable because of the large
acreages of County land in roads, highways, regional community services and large recreation sites tend to distort percentage relationships.

- 40 -

�On the basis of the land use inventory several physical trends were
discernible among commercial land uses.
These are summarized:
1.

The City of Petoskey provides region-wide retail services and
has the largest concentration of commercial land use . Of some
272 retail establishments in the County, 143 are in Petoskey
(53%). Remodeling, expansion and the development of new centers
in and near Petoskey reflect the strength of this retail community.
The tourist impact is noted from numerous retail establishments that close during the winter months .

2.

Harbor Springs is another important retail center, that reflects
strong tourist activity in the summer season.
Resort homes and
harbor facilities reflect seasonal trends to a high degree.
New
and remodeled stores indicate good trade area drawing power.

3.

Alanson is in a growing market area reflected by the fair to good
condition of stores as well as traffic activity in th€ retail
center . Some market may be lost to competing centers because of
congestion and lack of convenient parking.

4.

Mackinaw City has a high tourist impact that is evident from
seasonally operated stores and numerous tourist services (motels,
restaurants, gifts, etc.).
Several new establishments reflect a
steady tourist market.

In the smaller community areas, particularly the rural townships,
commercial uses are operating on a more marginal basis.
Some stores
have been abandoned and there are fewer retail services because of a
decline in the year-round population. However, several quality tourist
services are established in rural areas.
In the urban influenced townships, new commercial uses are locating along County roads and Sta~e
Highway's. This is a reflection of broader market areas, scarcity of
land in established centers, and the need for larger business sites .
Retail Sales
One of the more accurate indices of retail-commercial trends are sales
statistics o Based on the data published in the U. S. Census of Business
Reports, Emmet County has attained a consistent record of retail
growth .

- 41 -

�TABLE 15
RETAIL SALES BY YEAR
Emmet County
Year

Reported Sales

1958
1963
1967

$24,930,000
$29,977,000
$38,109,000

SOURCE:

U. S. Census of Business

It is significant that total retail sales in Emmet County increased
by $13.2 million since 1958 . Not counting the impact of inflation
this is a gross sales increase of 52.9%.
Some other significant trends show the following:
Emmet County is holding its relative position in terms of percent
of sales retained in the three County Regi0n of Charlevoix,
Cheboygan and Emmet.
The County share of retail services increased in the three County
Region of Charlevoix, Cheboygan and Emmet.
County areas outside of the City of Petoskey attained a larger
share of the total County sales .
Retail Center Plans
Future retailing in Emmet County cannot be measured with· the same accuracy as past and existing trends.
However, all of the projection
indices of metropolitan growth, local population increases, and tour..i.st
business projections established a sound economic basis upon which to
plan retail center improvements.
The actual impact of future development within the major trade areas of the County will determine which
centers can be improved or expanded to the greatest degree.

- 42 -

�Retailing in Emmet County has a bright future in terms of the following:
The County is a geographic terminus for tourist travel in the
northern Lower Peninsula. It is a major destination area.
Interstate freeways link the region with growing metropolitan
centers . There is excellent access from Detroit and Chicago
oriented routes are improving.
The County is centrally located within a complex of major ski
resorts and benefits from year-round tourist business on a high
level.
Local population growth is progressing at a reasonable rate, and
gains have occurred in diversified manufacturing.
Although the County has experienced growth, much of the development
has concentrated in the Petoskey-Harbor Springs area.
Several northern
Townships are expected to hold a stable permanent population, with some
slight growth.
If past trends continue, a few rural Townships may
lose population.
Following is a summary of retail center plans for Emmet County:
1.

Petoskey CBD Plan
The long range development plan of Petoskey's Central Business
District is described and illustrated in detail in the report
and plan of Petoskey's Central Business District a separate
report funded by the HUD "701" Program, The overall objective
of Petoskey's CBD Plan is to create a central community area
that is attractive and can function as the comparison shopping
and governmental focal point of a wide regional area; including
rural Emmet County.

2.

Harbor Springs
The City of Harbor Springs has a sound base upon which to plan
future retail center improvements. These relate to the high
value investments in seasonal homes in and adjacent to the City,
large marine facilities and services, and the increasing popularity of winter sports activities in nearby areas .
In the County Plan, Harbor Springs is classified as a major convenience center and has a large convenience trade area.
It is
expected that the City will expand as a major retail center in
the County and probably will progress to include more comparison
shopping facilities.
Specific plans for Harbor Springs retail center have not been prepared as a part of this report, since the City is engaged in a
separate comprehensive planning program .
-

43 -

�3.

Mackinaw City
Although the central retail area of Mackinaw City is not in Emmet
County, this community and the City of Cheboygan exert a strong
trade influence in the northern Townships of Emmet County . For
the purposes of Emmet County's retail center plan, it is assumed
that Mackinaw City will pursue programs to plan and improve retail
areas .
Hence, the City will retain or increase its share of the trad e
area's retail market .
Being positioned out of the County, no specific retail center plans
for Mackinaw City have been prepared .

4.

Minimum Convenience Centers
In addition to the larger City retail trade centers, there are.
several villages and unincorporated places that provide minimum
retail facilities.
These minimum retail centers provide services
ranging from a general store to several shopping center uses, as
in the Village of Alanson.
In addition to a general store, however, the minimum convenience centers are supported by tourist
lodging facilities and perhaps some general commercial activity
as well.
Following is a description of the six Minimum Convenience Centers
in Emmet County. The basic design principles expressed in these
plans relate to:
Consolidation of scattered retail uses into expanded retail
shopping centers.
Provision for off-street parking to increase retail sales
capacity.
The addition of landscaped areas and street trees to make the
centers more attractive.
a.

Alanson Center
Behind Petoskey and Harbor Springs, the Village of Alanson is
the third largest retail center in Emmet County. Alanson's
retail activity should be concentrated on US-3 1 with parking
behind the stores. If possible, a large community park should
be developed aiong the Crooked River. This would attract
tourists, boating enthusiasts and fishermen who use the River
at Alanson. A large central park i ng lot would be able to serve
the retail stores as well as the park facility.

- 44 -

�b.

Carp Lake Center
Retail services in Carp Lake are largely tourist oriented, and
there are numerous tourist lodging facilities situated around
the Lake (Paradise Lake), Existing center uses include:
two
gasoline stations, one marina and boat livery, one sporting
goods and hardware store, a grocery store and several motels
and cabin courts. The existing pattern of development is
crowded, there being little room for expansion and very limited
parking.
Future expansion at the Carp Lake Center will be difficult and
expensive to achieve because of existing development . However,
if an expanded market is desired, two critical objectives must
be reached.
First, the retail area must be enlarged to provide
room for building expansion and off-street parking.
Second,
some landscaped open space should be provided to develop open
views of Paradise Lake.

c.

Cross Village Center
The retail potential of Cross Village is strongly oriented to
the summer tourist season. However, it is reasonable to expect
some lake lot subdivisions to result in year-round resort dwellings. Also, there are a number of farms located in the surrounding area to support basic services.
Cross Village's retail inventory includes: two gasoline stations,
two gift shops, one grocery store, a large inn, and small snack
bar. The plan for future development illustrates a gradual
"filling in" of retail uses between these basic uses . Offstreet parking is located so as to serve the retail stores
and act as scenic turnouts for views over Lake Michigan.
Landscaped setbacks are sugges~ed for State Road to evolve into a
scenic route to the sand beaches and boat landing, which may
be expanded into a larger marina or harbor.

d.

Levering Center
Retail services in Levering are limited to one hardware store,
although several other commercial services are located on US31, out of the Village's former retail center .
Levering's plan is based on the potential attraction force of
a "County Ghost Town".
The original retail shops are mostly
vacant, as former retail enterprises have ceased or moved to
US-31. Another possibility is the development of a pre-1900
retail street. Under this possibility, the existing buildings would be restored to their original design.
The main
street could be cobblestoned and made to function like a
pedestrian mall. All parking would then be provided behind
the stores (east side).
The restored buildings could then
be used for actual retail services (groceries, drugs, gifts,
etc.).
-

45 -

�If the Ghost Town or Old Town theme does not evolve, retail
services will probably continue to develop on US-31 since
there would be little attraction to pull travelers off the
highway.
e.

Pellston Center
Pellston is the largest Village in the County and has the
largest concentration of permanent homes outside of the
Petoskey-Harbor Springs area.
The future plan for retail development is relatively uncomplicated emphasizing basic retail concepts.
These relate to
retail use concentrations, off-street parking, and a beautification plaza or mall to act as a focal point. Added to this
would be architectural improvements and pleasing center
appearance.

5.

Other Minimum Shopping Facilities
The previous paragraphs described various shopping areas in Emmet
County . In addition to these, there are other locations that may
develop commercially and these may include shopping center type
uses.
Based upon the distribution and compositi0n of competing retail
areas in the County, ten (10) other locations have possible longterm future retail center development.
The location of the ten potential retail centers are listed below,
roughly in the order of their development importance:
1.

Boyne Highlands - Nubs Nob Area

2.

Wilderness Park

3.

Larks Lake

4.

Bliss Center

5.

Resort Township (Intertown and Resort Roads)

6.

Good Hart

7.

West County Line on US-31

8.

Brutus

9.

Epsilon

10.

Stutsmanville

The actual priority and timing at which these centers may develop,
will be dependent upon the rate of future County growth and the
distribution of that growth among the sixteen Townships.
-

46 -

�TRENDS IN INDUSTRIAL USES
The generalized Existing Land Use Map of Emmet County illustrates the
location of industrial uses. However, the term industry encompasses
many different types of land uses with industrial characteristics,
and is not restricted to manufacturing operations. In addition to the
manufacturing and fabrication operations, the industrial use classification includes enclosed storage, open storage, private gravel e x traction areas, junk yards and related uses.
It is important to
recognize the inclusion of uses that are by nature nonmanufacturing.
The typical urban community has about nine percent of its developed
land area in industrial type use . In Emmet County, all City and
Village communities average about five percent and the Ccunty 2.4
percent .
It is to be expected that the County and its constituent
communities would have a below average proportion because of the
County's regional location.
Nearly half of the County's developed industrial land is in the communities of Petoskey, Resort Township and Bear Creek Township. The
Penn-Dixie Cement Company in Resort Township is the largest industrial
use in the County and it supports the largest employment.
Several
smaller industrial plants have located in the urbanized area of
Petoskey, near the Harbor Springs Airport and in Pellston. For the
most part, manufacturing uses are limited in size and number . Moreover, their locational pattern reflects the attraction forces of
transportation media (airports, railroads, highways and harbors),
concentrated labor markets, housing areas and access to other urban
services such as water and sewer facilities.
EMPLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION
In terms of employed labor force, TABLE 16 on the following page
indicates the breakdown by occupation within the County . These
figures are converted to percentages and compared with the State
of Michigan.
Some general observations can be drawn from the table.
Those occupations contingent to farming are somewhat higher than the state
average .
Craftsmen and operatives are lower than the State . This
was also found to be true in xhe City of Petoskey .
(See Petoskey
Industrial Study, March, 1969).
The Managers and
than that of the
tourist trade in
similar to State

Officials group and Service Workers groups are higher
State . This reflects in part on the motel and
the region. The remaining categories are relatively
averages.

As noted on the TABLE, the categories most oriented to manufacturing
industries (craftsmen, operatives, laborers) hav e a smaller percentage
of the employed labor force than the State average . This is partly
attributed to the dominance of retail employment to serve recreationtourist services, as well as the general lack of industrial activity
in all rural regi0ns of the State.
- 47 -

�TABLE 16
1960 0CCUPATIONAL CHARACTERISTICS
Emmet County

Major Occupational Group

Emmet County
Number
Perc·ent

Michigan
Percent

Relation to
State

Professional, Technical
and Kindred

550

10.6%

11. 5%

Farms and Farm Managers

228

4.4%

2.2%

Higher

Managers, Officials and
Proprietors

632

12.2%

7.3%

Higher

Clerical and Kindred

581

11.2%

13.9%

Sales Workers

411

7.9%

7 . 4%

Same

Craftsmen, Foremen and
Kindred

666

12.9%

15.4%

Same

Operatives and Kindred

681

13.2%

22.2%

Much Lower

Pvt. Household Workers

254

4.9%

2 . 2%

Higher

Service Workers

635

12.3%

8.7%

Higher

78

1.5%

0 . 9%

Higher

Laborers

326

6.3%

4.0%

Higher

Not Reported

132

2. 6%

4 . 3%

5,174

100.0%

100 . 0%

Farm Laborers and Foremen

TOTAL EMPLOYED
SOURCE:

U.S. Census of Population, 1960

- 48 -

Same

Lower

�TABLE 17 shows the County's employed labor force by industry group,
ranked in terms of importance in a 12 County Region.
It is significant that Emmet County had the second highest employment base for
major service industries including retail trade. Manufacturing ranked
fourth and agriculture fifth.
Industrial Pl·an Elements
Based on the existing employment characteristics of the County and
general economic conditions related to manufacturing industry it can
be concluded that:
The area's economy is premised on a retail-service trade, based
primarily on tourist spending and will probably continue as such
in the future.
The labor force of Emmet County is oriented to service-retail
occupations and is lacking in the manufacturing skilled labor.
The region is removed from the major metropolitan centers of the
State and thereby removed from large labor markets, major triansport systems and market areas.
Labor diversity is a limiting factor in attracting industries that
are able to function in this economic area of the State.
Future industrial development may occur on isolated parcels until
some basic changes in transportation systems of the area are completed.
Future population growth will be affected by future industrial
development as well as increased tourist recreation services.
Emmet County is a major recreation service center in one of the most
impressive resort areas of the Midwest, which extends along the entire Lake Michigan shoreline.
The smaller and more northerly centers
that dot this shoreline rely to a heavy extent on tourist spending.
It- may be possible to see small scale machine shops, fabricating
plants, circuit production and similar industries come to Emmet
County at a gradual pace as in the past. The diversity and pace
of future industrial development will be affected by The following:
There may be a natural trend toward industrialization in the
smaller urban areas as an answer to problems of overcrowding
in major metropolitan areas.
Open lands suitable for industrial development near the Pellston
Airport may spur substantial economic growth in this central
region of the County.
This will generate both industrial and
domestic demands for community sewer and water services.

-

49 -

�TABLE 17
EMPLOYEES BY MAJOR INDUSTRY GROUP
Emmet County

'19'50
Agriculture

Rank in 12
· co·u nty_ Ar·ea_

844

7th

24

5th

3

Construction

1960

Rank in 12
COU!l,_!y Area

366

5th

10th

0

12th

420

1st

468

3rd

Manufacturing

924

2nd

681

4th

Utilities

337

2nd

336

3rd

1,195

2nd

1,447

2nd

Business &amp; Personal Services

795

1st

568

2nd

Other Services

579

1st

891

2nd

Public Administration

189

-2nd
-

183

- 2nd

5,387

2nd

5,174

2nd

16,534

2nd

15,904

2nd

Forestry &amp; Fishing
Mining

(J"1
G)

Wholesale and Retail Trade

Total Employed
Total Population
SOURCE:

U.S . Census of Population
Twelv e Counties in the Northern Region o f the Lower Peninsula.

�Other significant industrial growth areas may evolve at Mackinaw
City, and near the Harbor Springs Airport. Again sewer and water
demands will be generated.
The provision of new community water-sewer systems as well as the
expansion of existing systems.
Although not underway at this writing, a detailed Industrial Economic
Base Analysis and Plan will be prepared for Emmet County under the
11
701" Urban Planning Assistance Program. When completed, a more
precise analysis of industrial locations in the County will be available .
TRENDS IN RESIDENTIAL USES
Residential development in Emmet County assumes three basic forms.
First, is the urban density development in City-Village communities,
second, is the rural farm and rural nonfarm dwellings scattered among
the Township communities, and thirdly, the resort-vacation homes occupied on a seasonal basis, largely by families from distant metropolitan centers.
Each of these housing types exert basic pressures
for development and each type has a slightly different impact on the
lands and resources of Emmet County.
From the viewpoint of sewer and water utility services, the higher
density urban development in City-Village areas requires complete
water-sewer utilities. Competing for second priority needs are low
density housing areas close to City-Village areas and the higher
density seasonal home areas (as the one-hundred foot lots along lakes
and rivers). Rural farm and rural nonfarm homes exert lower priority
demands because of large individual building sites .
The need to promote concentrated residential development in Emmet
County is dramatized by the land to population ratio .
Emmet County's
total surface area (land and water) is 295,040 acres. Assumimg
all of this was available for use and equally divided among the County's
1970 population, there would only be some 16 acres of land per resident.
By addition in tourist demands and deducting land in forests
and nonresidential purposes, the available acreage would be much less .
In 1960, Emmet County's population was 15,904 persons occupying 4,696
households (3.33 persons per household).
Of this total, 48% of the
population lived in the urban communities of Petoskey and Harbor
Springs.
Seventy-three (73) percent of the population lived in the
County area encompassing the Townships of Bear Creek, Little Traverse,
Littlefield and Resort; and the Cities of Petoskey and Harbor Springs .
Hence, the remaining twenty-seven (27) percent of the population was
divided among the twelve remaining Townships.
This is an a v erage
350 persons per Township.

- 51 -

�Population projections for Emmet County show a possible 22,500 persons
by 1990. Of this total, some 18,510 persons are expected to live in
the six (6) urban oriented communities listed in the preceding paragraph (82% of the 1990 total).
The 1990 projection suggests an, increase of 2,060 permanent dwellings
over the 1960 total . Of these added units, only 370 are projected to
impact the Township's away from urban communities . This is an average
growth rate of about sixty permanent dwellings per year plus the repair and replacement of older depreciated units.
In 1960, Emmet County reported 2,560 seasonal housing units. This
represented some 32% of all housing in the County, both occupied and
1 The rural nonfarm areas had over forty-seven (47) perunoccupied ,
cent of their housing classified as seasonal . Comparable data on
seasonal dwelling constructed since 1860 is not readily available,
however, a substantial number of seasonal homes were constructed in
"Chalet Villages" near the ski resorts, on inland lakes, and on Lake
Michigan. Adding in trailers used for seasonal occupancy, it is
probable that more than half of the current rural nonfarm hou sing is
seasonal.
For residential planning purposes, it can be expected that urban resi_,dential demands will be greatest in and near Petoskey, moderate in
the Community areas of Harbor Springs, Alanson and Mackinaw City,
and slight in the outlying rural service communities .
The type of home most in demand is for three bedrooms and ov er (80%
to 90% of the market).
Only ten (10) percent of the market is for
efficiency, one bedroom and/or two bedroom units. 2 There is a strong
demand for three and four bedroom homes for families with incomes
under $6,000 per year.
Seasonal or recreation home demands will be strongest in those areas
that have multiple recreation use potential . Hence, a vacation home
that can offer ready access to skiing facilities, swimming beaches,
scenic views, forests, hunting and fishing will be in greatest demand,
Residential Planni~oncepts for Emmet County
Based on the analysis of County housing demands and population trends,
the following planning concepts should be used to guide future residential development in Emmet County:

1

2

According to the Emmet County Equalization Department, the proportion
of seasonal homes to permanent homes is still about one-third in 1969.
Mr. Ken Peterson, Realtor and Mr. Cy Jordan, from questionnaire
interviews assessing the real estate market in the five year
period prior to January, 1969 .

- 52 -

�1.

Recognize the fact that all land in the County will not and should
not be developed. That which is developed for residential use
should fit into logical service areas for schools, parks, shopping
and related.

2,

Scenic resources are integral elements of the County's economy .
These should be protected so that the character of the County
remains attractive and desirable for both permanent residents
and visitors.

3.

Wildlife is important to Emmet County as are forest and vegetative
resources.
Development patterns must recognize ecological factors
in the environment. Hence, swamp lands, wooded areas, streams
and related resources must be protected from pollution and depletion .
If present in the area, natural resource areas can extend into
urbanizing areas as open space wedges and recreation sites.

4.

Access to lakes and streams becomes more scarce each year .
View
existing undeveloped lake-river frontages as resources to be protected,
Encourage water oriented development to form in cluster
development patterns, rather than parcel off the frontage on a
100% individual access basis,
Cluster patterns can provide more
recreation home sites per foot of water frontage than the traditional subdividing method. Moreover, the scenic shore or river
bank will be protected.

5,

County roads normally provide access to farms and nonfarm homes
in rural areas, Traditional developments follow the existing
road patterns until the frontage is gone and large internal
vacant areas remain.
Preferably, small service roads and cluster
developments should extend from the County road rather than serve
individual unit frontage.
This will keep the roadway safer for
abutting developments and more efficient for traffic needs.

6.

Organize communities t~ promote and establish housing for low
income families and retirement age citizens. A review of housing
needs among Indian families should also be initiated .

The approach to the Residential Plan for Emmet County considers the
foregoing as concepts to guide the overall design of the Plan .
Residential Areas Plan
The "Residential Areas Plan" map illustrates several factors that
will influence the configurations of future housing areas in the
County,
These are:
Resource areas that should remain in a natural condition to
support broad scale resource management programs and ecological
balance.

-

53 -

�..."'
z

z

"'

I

....

~~iJ.,......--c==#==4==r==mr-=jt=·-;:n=

-

.,

::,
0

..

.,

..
.."' ..""

1'

"'

~
~

L

~ ~

&lt;&gt;

..
"'
3 .,..
"' ..
..
•. "' .~
I-

!

►

►

z

0
0

::,

Q

~

-

C

-

I
I
I
I

0

.••
•

..
J

--

z

1-

z

"'l-

..

o

-

.."'"
.."

'-&gt;

&lt;(
_J

a...

►

"''-&gt;

!::

CJ)

-

&lt;(

w
0:::
&lt;(

,,..

~r;·~-:--:-··· · t

_J

;:

&lt;(

:: ~ ~
::

(/) 0..

::.

11 4 0 :
,( ~ ~ ...J

}:_

:,'.,•

C

..

,, w

ii1 z

.

i!i:' !l

- -t----

"'

••

"'

~1 n
1,l

~'

t:

E

I

~
;

~
Q

-I-~

"'

"'&lt;t

ll.

~

o

i . --}r
_r

zz
w~

"',.

"

"'

~~==-,i'-=~""1n11

"'

",._

"'

o&lt;-&gt;

-

-❖:•:•:•:•.:

•

"'

,._

(/)~

,._

I

'~r.i==!'

W:E

z

a::~

0

...

~

...,

-~-;;

.o
.,_

.~Ii

~

,-

...,

............
r

•-

... -..,
r

.............

~
I

-1,,
t&gt;/

.::,
/

&gt;I/

3

)(

t,'

7

......
o -::,
o c

., 0

u

C
0

E
~ o
.c

c::·c

];
·;

Q.

�A highly tentative flignment for a future express type highway
through the County.
The basic County road - State Highway network which interconnects
the functional land use areas of the County . Some suggested
route changes have been included.
Key resort attractions and facilities wherein seasonal home construction is likely to continue.
Existing urban communities and concentrated housing areas.
The above factors were mapped and evaluated in terms of the pattern
of soil resources, topography, deer yard areas, quality fish streams
and existing land use.
These topics were discussed in previous report sections.
On the basis of the above, a generalized pattern of logical future
housing areas evolved.
In the communities of Petoskey, Bear Creek
Township and Resort Township, the Residential Plan is bas d on
neighborhood and residential plans for those communities. 2 These
Petoskey Area findings are considered to be a part of the Emmet
County Residential Plan, including any modifications and amendments
that may be made from time to time.
The methods used to delineate the urban residential areas near
Petoskey are the same as the methods used to determine urban residential areas in other County areas. Major highways, railroads,
public lands, steep topography, soils poorly suited to development
and related features were used as boundary references for residential areas.
On the 11 County Residential Plan 11 map, long-range urban neighborhood
areas were combined to form larger community areas. Each of the
community areas may be further divided into one or more neighborhood
units. The number of neighborhoods will ultimately be determined by
the density of population within each unit and the geographic size
of the community.

1

•

J

2

The mapped expressway is an interpretation of a general State Highway Department proposal. The route, however, is in an alignment
which appears to support basic planning conclusions for the County.
The final alignment may vary substantially from the tentativ e routing illustrated.
Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc., Residential Areas, Petoskey Area
Planning Commission, January, 1969.
-

54 -

�ii

Following is a discussion of the general community areas mapped on
the irResidential Areas Plan":
1.

Petoskey Area
Area 1
Altogether there are nine residential areas in and near the City
of Petoskey and the Townships of Bear Creek and Resort. These
vary in size, some containing several planned neighborhood units.
The neighborhood units, however, are not delineated in expectation
that they will be fully developed within 20 years.
It may be appropriate to view the neighborhoods as basic "planning units" or
simply as residential areas.
Persons who build homes and purchase lots in the neighborhood
areas have the knowledge that they are in logical home areas.
On a long term basis, they can expect to be within a reasonable
distance from planned elementary schools, local recreation
areas, and community water-sewer-utility services.

2.

Harbor Springs Area
Areas 2, 3, 4 and 5
The Harbor Springs Area Residential Plan is presented in four
(4) basic areas. Area 2 can probably be divided into two neighborhood units, centered on a large resource area for open space recreation. Area 3 has the potential of being divided into four
neighborhoods. The exact number will depend on actual growth, the
ratio of seasonal homes to permanent residences, and the acreage
devoted to recreation-community uses. Area 4 encompasses most of
the existing developed lands in Harbor Springs. Area 5 is positioned along Little Traverse Bay and is predominantly a recreation
home area at this time. Development will be attracted to this area
by the scenic qualities of Little Traverse Bay.
Some negative
aspects relate to the flight path of the Harbor Springs Airport
and the rather narrow shape of the area.
Overall, Areas 2 thru 5 indicate the probable impact areas for
future high density residential development. As in the Petoskey
area, the capacity population of these areas exceeds the projected
growth.

3.

Round Lake Area
Areas 6, 7 and 9
The Round Lake Area of Emmet County is a sort of development crossroads where the urbanizing influence of Petoskey, Harbor Springs
and Alanson come together.
Round Lak~ also generates development
influences by virtue of water oriented recreation, home sites, the
Petoskey State Park, the Harbor Springs Airport, Conway and Highway interchanges.
- 55 -

�•

Planning and arranging land uses in the Round Lake area is complicated by the narrow highway corridors (US-31 and M-131) created
by Lake Michigan, Round Lake and Crooked Lake. Added to this is
a general mix of existing land uses, an incidence of poorly drained
soils, and absence of urban utility services.
The potential routing of a north-south freeway through this area,
will result in accelerated pressures and demands for land . Hence,
the Townships and communities involved must allocate land resources to housing, industry, tourist lodging and general commercial before it is too late to decide the best growth pattern.
Zoning will then be necessary to enforce decisions on the best
uses of land .
4.

Crooked Lake Area
Areas 8, 10 and 11
Crooked Lake is an established tourist housing area . The most
concentrated recreation home areas are found along the north shore
in and near Oden.
Pickerel Lake to the east is also developed with seasonal homes
and new units are being constructed along undeveloped shore area.
The entire Crooked-Pickerel Lake area is limited for development
by poorly drained soils.
The problem is particularly acute along
the shoreline where the demand for lake front home sites is
greatest. As a result, quantities of sewage effluent on the
surface of the ground and in the lake have reached a point of
serious pollution hazard.
This is an area which clearly demonstrates planning deficiencies in terms of :
(a)

carrying capacity of soils and land resources .

(b)

substandard and out-moded development standards .

(c)

inadequate traffic routes to serv e local and regional traffic ,

(d)

disregard for land use relationships (mix ed uses) ,

(e)

failure to implement central utility services prior to
intensive use of land.

The above points underscore some major problems affecting the
Oden-Crooked Lake area and it will likely result in expens iv e
community improvements to correct past mistakes ,

•

-

56 -

�5,

Alanson Area
Area 12
Alanson is an incorporated Village and is the County's third
largest retail service center , Retail services, the Crooked
River, and a new school will attract additional development
in and near Alanson. School enrollment increases since 1960
are factual evidence of continued growth.
The Valley of the Crooked River in Alanson is characterized with
soil and drainage conditions similar to areas near Crooked Lake.
Poor drainage and swamp conditions establish unstable building
conditions that will become more acute unless community sewer
and water systems are installed.

6.

Pellston Area
Areas 13 and 14
The community of Pellston is an incorporated Village located in
portions 6f two Townships.
This community is important because
it is adjacent to the Emmet County Airport, hence, a potential
source of added economic development for the County as well as
a major transportation terminal in the northern Lower Peninsula .
One manufacturing plant has located adjacent to the airport, and
others may be possible in the future .
A problem in accommodating residential growth is relating to
existing community service facilities, while avoiding the flight
~aths of major runways. There is also a land squeeze in Pellston,
because the existing Village is surrounded by public lands,
some poor soil areas, a major highway, and airport approach
zones.
It is difficult to cluster new housing because of the
factors listed above.

7.

Mackinaw City Area
Area 15
Mackinaw City supports a relatively low year-round population
because of the seasonal nature of the economy . Moreover, the
community is situated in two County's: Emmet and Cheboygan .
Most of the retail services, shopping and tourist lodging
facilities are in Cheboygan County, while many of the seasonal
and year-round dwellings are on the Emmet side.

l

The demand for residential land in Mackinaw City will be determined by successes in developing industrial land, especially_
those activities that require access to Great Lakes shipping lanes .
Also, the extent of tourist services will bear on added employment to sustain a larger year-round population . Potential industrial areas are located in Emmet County and these are linked
by rail to port areas and are readily accessible from the I-75
Freeway.
- 57 -

�"'

8•

Cross Village Area
Areas 16 and 17
Cross Village is located in a highly scenic area of Emmet County .
Developed on a high bluff, there are commanding panoramic views
over Lake Michigan, views which are especially dramatic during
sunset periods. Cross Village is also an historic Indian Mission
site.
Significant year-round employment opportunities in Cross Village
may be difficult to realize. Highway access is limited, there
are no railroads and existing community serv ices are oriented
to rural and tourist markets. Additional seasonal home development is the most likely economic impact that can add to the Community.
Cross Village has excellent Lake Michigan orientation
and it lies between the attraction forces of Wilderness State
Park and the ski resort areas to the south.
Since rleasure
boating on Lake Michigan is a highly attractive tourist activity,
harbor, beach and lake front park developments at Cross Village
could enhance community development potentials.

9.

Other Residential Areas
Even though the Residential Plan outlines a wide number of potential
residential areas that can be planned and serviced to house concentrated patterns of development, a large proportion of new homes
(seasonal and nonseasonal) will locate on tracts of land throughout
farm and nonfarm areas. Although this scattering development
should not be promoted as a planning principle, it can be less
of a problem with careful attention to ground water resources,
soils and overcrowding.
The problems of overcrowding and the mixed use character of developments on Crooked Lake and Paradise Lake must be avoided on the
other inland water resources of the County . If developers anticipate high density subdivision activity, then immediate concern
must be given for community water supplies and sewage treatment
services.

-

58 -

�WATER RESOURCES

(PART I A . 6.)

The general discussion of water resources is included in the report
section covering Natural Resources.
Specific information on the
quality of ground water supplies, well logs and community water
resources is contained in PART III of this Comprehensive Sewer and
Water Plan.
PART III contains the conclusions and recommendations
of the consulting engineers who participated in the preparation of
this report, McNamee, Porter and Seeley,

- 59 -

�LONG RANGE FINANCING PLAN

(PART II B

0

)

There are various bonding approaches and financial methods that local
units of government in the State of Michigan employ for the financing
of major water system and/or sewer disposal and collection facilities .
The following are the most commonly used in Michigan:
1.

Contract Bonds sold on the provisions of Act 185, P . A. of Michigan,
1957 as amended, commonly known as the Department of Public Works
Act.

2.

General Obligation Bonds sold under the prov isions of City and
Village Charters and Act 202, P.A. of Michigan, 1943 as amended,
commonly referred tQ as the Municipal Finance Act .

3o

Revenue Bonds sold pursuant to the provisions of Act 94, P.A . of
Michigan, 1933 as amended, commonly known as the Revenue Bond Act.

4.

Special Assessment Bonds sold under the provisions of Act 188,
P.A. of Michigan, 1954 as amended, and/or the Municipal Finance
Act.

PUBLIC ACT 185
Each of the above mentioned financial arrangements has certain advantages to the issuing municipality o The one that seems to combine
all the advantages and the one that is enjoying the greatest use, at
this time in Michigan, for the financing of major capi t al improvement
water and sewer programs, is the Department of Pubic Works Legislation,
Act 185 . Under this legislation, local units of government may enter
into a contract with the County Board of Commissioners .
The contract between the County and the contracting municipality,
provides, among other things, that the local unit has the right to
pay contractual commitments for debt service charges from many and
varied sources.
Contractual obligations incurred in behalf of the
local unit of government are exempt from any charter or statutory
tax or debt limitations. This is a key advantage from the standpoint
of the small community that finds itself facing the problem of financing several new public facilities at the same time . In many instances
where communities with a low tax base are confronted with the major
capital improvement programs, it is often advisable for that community to save its local bonding capacity for those projects that
cannot be financed through the County Department of Public Works.
Article 9 of the 1963 Michigan Constitution, provides that the local
unit would have an unlimited taxing power to meet the contractual
commitment to the County.

- 60 -

�The unit of government requiring water and / or sewer serv ice may contract with the Emmet County Board of Commissioners for the acquisition
and construction of said facilities. A contract would prov ide for
semi-annual principal and interest payments to be made by the local
unit of government to the County for the liquidation of County Bonds
sold to finance the improvement. Under the provisions of Act 185,
the local unit has numerous financial alternatives whereby it can
meet the contract payments to the County. Mainly these are:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.

ad valorem taxation
water and/or sewer user charges
connection charges
debt service charges
general fund allocations.

From the foregoing, it can be readily determined that the local unit
of government has many options available to it.
These options combine the advantages of both the general obligation bond issue and
the revenue bond issue as well as the special assessment financing
arrangements . Many communities in Michigan are financing water and
sewer programs through the Department of Public Works and liquidating
the contractual obligations by both connection charges and water/sewer
user charges.
Such an approach eliminates the need to tax residents
in the community that may not be served by the proposed facility
and places the utility on a self-sustaining user pay basis .
GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS
If the local units in Emmet County were to elect to finance water and
sewer projects within their own statutory limitations, the general
obligation bond, from the marketing standpoint, is the most attractive.
However, the provisions of the Municipal Finance Act (Act 202), limits
the amount of general obligation bonds that may be outstanding at any
one time, to ten percent of the local unit's latest state equalized
valuation . Local charters may provide for a lesser bonding capacity
than the ten percent as provided by state statute . General obligation
bonds must be submitted to a vote of the people. Even though a local
unit may offer general obligation bonds, and pledge the full faith and
credit of the municipality, they could, nonetheless, employ water and / or
sewer user charges as a means of liquidating the debt and possibly
eliminate the need for an ad valorem tax spread ,

- 61 -

�J
ACT 94.

REVENUE BONDS

Many communities in the State of Michigan, because they found themselves faced with the problem of bonding capacity, turned to the provisions of Act 94 and offered revenue bonds for the acquisition of
water and sewer facilities.
The revenue bond, under the provision of
Act 94, does not require a vote of the people but is authorized solely
and only by the adoption of the bond ordinance by the looal units of
governing body.
The marketing problems inherent to the issuance of
Act 94 bonds are somewhat more rigid and consequently, interest charges
are somewhat higher than normally experienced on general obligation
bonds or Act 185 bonds.
STATE AND FEDERAL AID
As a result of the favorable "Clean Waters Bond Issue" election held
State-wide in November of 1968, the State of Michigan has monies
available with which to fund a new grant program for water pollution
control facilities.
Under the provisions of enabling legislation,
cities, villages, townships and counties may receive up to 55% of the
total project cost in the form of State and Federal Aid.
Four Federal agencies presently have grant-in-aid programs available
to municipalities for the construction of water distribution systems
and sewage disposal facilities.
These agencies are:
1.
2.
3.
4.

The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD)
Farmers Horne Administration (FHA)
Economic Development Administration (EDA)
Federal Water Pollution Control Adrninistration.(FWPCA)

Much news is being generated by the Congress, regarding inadequate
funding of the foregoing Federal programs in the past few years and
every effort is being made to remedy that situation4 At the present
time, Congress is considering substantial increases in the appropriations to once again fund the Federal programs for basic water and
sewer construction grants. The proper procedure for applying to these
agencies for financial assistance is to secure Form SF-101 of any of
the regional offices of the above mentioned Federal Agencies and
process them . Once the form has been prepared and signed by the
local unit, it should be returned to that agency, from which it came,
where it will be reviewed and assigned to the appropriate Federal
Agency having jurisdiction over the applying municipality .

- 62 -

�ACT 188 .

SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BONDS

Public Act 188 of 1954 stipulates that a township with a State Equalized Valuation of at least $7,500,000 may issue special assessment
bonds on petition signed by not less than 51% o f the district requiring
improvements, pledging full faith and credit of the township.
Only
Bear Creek and Resort Townships now qualify in Emmet County.
Act 188 Bonds may be issued in an amount not to exceed 3 % of the assessed valuation per year without a vote of the electors and with a
maximum of outstanding bonds at any time of 12% of the assessed v aluat i on . With an affirmative of the electors, the maximum 12% may be
issued in one year. These bonds are retired by special assessments
against the benefiting property.
The assessments may be spread over
a maximum period of 30 years and if any assessments default, they
revert to the Township at large.
Therefore, in order to sell the
bonds, it is necessary to have a vote of the electors to prov ide for
the necessary millage should a default arise.
If the equalized valuation of the Township is less than $7,500,000,
then the Township must use Act 116 of 1923 which requires a petition
signed by 65% of the district requiring improvements and prov ides
that no annual installment of the assessment may exceed 15% of the
assessed valuation of the property.

- 63 -

�j
PLAN UPDATING PROPOSAL

(PART II C . )

It is recommended that consideration be given to the formation of a
County Department of Public Works or similar department (as outlined
in Part II B) for the purpose of keeping the Comprehensive Sewer and
Water Plan up-to-date. This department would:
1,

Be responsible to the County Board of Commissioners, yet relieve
the Board of working on time consuming details.

2.

Be in a position to determine project priorities which may change
in response to the demands of any given future date.

3.

Keep abreast of current methods of financing and federal assistance
programs. In rural areas, the Farmers Home Administration Programs
will be important.

4.

Work with the local and state health departments in order to establish programs for achieving and maintaining the increasingly more
stringent water quality standards as established by the Department
of Natural Resources,

5.

Insure the best utilization of existing and future resources within
the County for the planning and construction of public works projects.

6.

Provide overall technical leadership for sewer and water planning,
including assurances that facilities are competently operated and
maintained by a qualified staff.

7.

Be flexible to assist smaller units of government with system
development, especially in terms of extending financial abilities
through full faith and credit backing of County valuation .

As a particular project is planned, the services of a competent bonding attorney and bonding consultant should be obtained to assist in
the financial planning of the project.
The determination of sewer and water needs is directly related to land
use . Hence, the County Board of Commissioners should establish procedures whereby the Department of Public Works or any other responsible
committee, works in close coordination with the County Planning Commission.
If there is County-wide zoning, then the County Zoning Commission will be brought into the water and sewer planning process also .
Perhaps the single most important responsibility of the DPW, outside
of its financial objectives, is to determine project priorities . To
best perform this, the County must plan and execute individual projects
within the framework of the overall County Sewer and Water Plan. Township Boards, the County Board of Commissioners, priv ate land developers,
the Health Department, and various other planning groups will initiate
many of the project proposals.
-

64 -

�l
Because of the importance of the Comprehensive Sewer and Water Plan,
efforts must be made from time to time to reappraise the Plan and update the proposals outlined therein.
The frequency with which the updating process occurs will depend on the pace of future land development, major new directives on pollution control, an~/or unforeseen
changes in the quality of existing water supplies. The Plan should
probably be given a thorough review every ten (10) years; sooner if
major new land developments impact the County.

-

65 -

�COMPREHENSIVE SEWER AND WATER PLAN:
PART III

�COMPREHENSIVE SEWER &amp; WATER PLAN
This section of the report encompasses PART III of the Comprehensive
Sewer and Water Plan, and describes the salient features of existing
systems and proposed improvements.
WASTE WATER COLLECTION AND TREATMENT
Due to the importance of the water resources in Emmet County, it is
vital that they remain of the highest quality.
To insure this
quality, improved waste water treatment facilities are required .
As a result of the Federal Water Quality Act of 1964, a number of
communities in the County have already taken steps to provide new or
improve existing waste water treatment and collection facilities.
The Federal Water Quality Act required all states to establish upto-date water quality standards,
The Michigan Water Resources Commission has complied with this act and has obtained approval from
the Federal Water Quality Administration of the standards it has
established.

J

Early in 1969, communities in the State, including some in Emmet
County, received stipulations from the Michigan Department of Natural
Resources.
These stipulations stated that these communities would
provide secondary waste water treatment, if they were not already
doing so, and would provide facilities for the removal of a minimum
of 80 percent of the total phosphates from the waste water influent
to their treatment facilities.
The stipulations also provided for
consideration of a lesser degree of treatment than would be accomplished with a secondary process. However, the Water Resources
Commission had stated that if the treatment method employed did not
achieve a minimum 5-day Biochemical Oxygen Demand removal, Federal
grant monies would not be available.
The Cities of Petoskey, Harbor
Springs and Mackinaw City have made every effort to comply with these
stipulations and each has plans and specifications for waste water
treatment improvements completed or being prepared. A large portion
of the present population will be served by these improv ements .
Following is a discussion of the existing waste water collection and
treatment facilities, existing problem areas, and proposed improvements within Emmet County.

-66 -

�Existing Facilities
At the present time, the Cities of Petoskey, Harbor Springs and Mackinaw
City have collection and treatment facilities.
The resort communities
of Harbor Point and Wequetonsing also have sewers and treatment facilities and the Bay View Association has sewers only, with treatment
being provided by the City of Petoskey.
Boyne Highlands provides waste
water treatment also.
It is estimated that approximately fifty-three
percent of the year-round residents of Emmet County are served by
these collection systems.
1.

Petoskey
The City of Petoskey is served by a separate sewer system; that is,
a sewer system for waste water and a storm sewer system for surface
water runoff.
The City's waste water is given primary treatment at
a plant located at the mouth of the Bear River.
It's location is
shown on the map, "Existing Sanitary Sewer Service." The plant
was originally constructed to use a chemical precipitation process .
However, as the degree of treatment was not appreciably increased
by the addition of chemicals, this process was abandoned and the
waste water had been given primary treatment only since November,
1969. The area presently served by the Petoskey treatment plant
is shown on the map "Existing Sanitary Sewer Service."
Harbor Springs
The City of Harbor Springs also has existing storm and sanitary
sewer systems. There is some ground water infiltration into the
sanitary sewer system and possibly some storm water connections.
Fine screening and disinfection of the waste water is prov ided
and it is then discharged into Little Traverse Bay without
further treatment. Discharge was originally at the shore line
but around 1960 the outfall sewer was extended out into the bay .
The Harbor Springs service area is shown on the "Existing Sanitary
Sewer Service 11 map.

,1

3•

Mackinaw City
Mackinaw City is served by separate sewer systems . The service
area for the sanitary system is shown on the existing service
area map, as ls the location of the City's existing treatment
plant. The existing plant is similar to an Imhoff Tank and provides the equivalent of primary treatment. Primary sedimentation
is accomplished in the upper part of the tank and solids digestion
in the lower sections.

-

67 -

�4o

Harbor Point
The community of Harbor Point provides its own waste water collection and treatment system. An Imhoff Tank followed by disinfection is the treatment process used.

So

Wequetonsing
Wequetonsing has a sanitary sewer system with treatment by means
of an Imhoff Tank.

6.

Bay View
Bay View also has a sanitary sewer system. The waste Water is
pumped to the Petoskey Plant for treatment.

7.

Boyne Highlands
Boyne Highlands provides for its own waste water treatment with
2 1/2 acres of lagoons.
Effluent from the lagoons is by infiltration into the ground through the bottom of the lagoons.

Existing Problem Areas
The existing treatment facilities discussed above, with the exception
of Boyne Highlands, are not adequate and will not meet present water
quality standards. Problems also exist in areas of the County not
served by the above sewer systems. As previously mentioned, the
areas around Crooked and Pickerel Lakes and along the Crooked River
have poorly drained soils and high ground water levels. These conditions will prevent the proper operation of septic tanks and drain
fields.
A sewer system and treatment plant to serve this area is
required . However, sewer systems of this type, around lakes, are
characteristically expensive. A greater length of sewer is required
to serve any given number of dwellings and ground water is normally
high around lakes requiring costly dewatering or trenches prior to
the installation of sewers.
A potential problem exists in Pellston. The majority of the lots
within the Village are small, 50 feet wide by 160 feet deep, particularly in the Business District where they are 25 feet wide by 150 feet
deep o These sizes do not provide sufficient area to operate both
private wells and septic tanks on the same lot without potential health
hazards.
J

•
- 68 -

�Planned Sewer Facility Improvements
A number of waste water treatment improvements in the County are being
planned at the present time. They are as follows:
Petoskey
The City of Petoskey recently awarded contracts for the construction
of a new 2 . 5 million gallons per day, design flow, waste water treatment plant which is to be located in Magnus Park in the City. The
existing treatment plan is to be abandoned and the waste water will
be pumped to the new treatment plant by means of a pumping station to
be constructed near the existing plant site. The new facility will
provide primary treatment, secondary treatment utilizing the activated
sludge process and tertiary treatment by microstraining. The treatment effluent from the new plant which will be of a very high quality,
will be discharged into Little Traverse Bay approximately 1,100 feet
from the shore line.
It is anticipated that phosphate removal will
be well ov er the 80 percent minimum requirement. The new treatment
plant, which was designed by McNamee, Porter and Seeley, Consulting
Engineers for the City, has a design capacity to serve nineteen
thousand people in the design year 2000. This design population
includes both permanent and seasonal residents in the City of Petoskey
and adjacent areas in Resort and Bear Creek Townships . The 1990 and
year 2000 service area boundaries and the location of the new treatment plant is shown on the Future Water and Sewer Service map . These
boundaries are based on anticipated future development and their
location may vary from that shown depending on where this development occurs" McNamee, Porter and Seeley have developed a General
Sewer Plan for the City of Petoskey in which provisions were made
for conducting the waste water from the townships to the new treatment plant. However, no sewers as yet have been designed in the
Townships . Plans are to continue to treat the waste water from the
Bay View Association at the Petoskey Treatment Plant.
Bear Creek Township has obtained the serv ices of Williams and Works,
Consulting Engineers, to study waste water collection and treatment
in the Township.
Harbor Springs and Little Traverse Township
The City of Harbor Springs and Little Traverse Township have joined
together in the formation of a waste water treatmen t authority . The
authority has recently received bids on a new treatment facility
which was designed for them by Williams and Works . Treatment will
be aerated lagoons followed by disinfection and spray irrigation.
The phosphates are utilized by the vegetation growth on the area on
which the lagoon effluent is sprayed . Therefore, no separate phosphate
remov al facilities are required . Spraying will be done during the
summer months with storage provided for the waste water during the
winter months. The location of the treatment facility, which is to
be constructed on a 320-acre site, is shown on the ''future Water and
Sewer Service Area" map.
- 69 -

�'

l
I

,' \ '

1'

,~.
~
,
'{
'

' '

{

J

J

J

J

1

,{

1
1
1~_, l~,- ~-' 1 1

1

l

~

l
- J

-1 _J 7

-1

C E C I l

-~·c

r

B A

A
s

r

T

.M

A

--~,,

----

u R G EON

••
•

••
~

r

B A

~

□
TI-·1'1G\
I i ~~·1-------- :

~

,~ "

'

'

~

C:Jl-6~
lo_~"C]\
il ~~ .
_i.

,£_.__j

v

.

G

•

~=~--

•
toOO!UillT

i

,

'
ii

I

~
,.

\, "

.--·

•

.

' .

'r .

1o

--ll

..

"

I

~

·

•

__:_

~-)1 ~~~L·

I

:

i ..

.o:;:, ;_ . .;

I

-T- -\----~ -------~~--\ .-

;
'

,

1

.

..

;·

I

\

;----1

TI·:

1

~'-

,

I

&gt;··: r:z1 ·

f i i

..

..,, 'h

1

~

••

i

T 37N

~. __ J

"

.

r •••

•

I

,~I1,
3

:

i!["".=
.....]_]Lr::]..IE]..' . ~\-~:::i:=
-- -jlJuyL.uuJ~~,
='=~~~.--- .- . - - - ~- JI---------] . □□'r i -+
p-

"

lJ
... ,~·o,,o·:·. ;-

.1

j

• jp ~
· S~ A
,-•;·---r---, I, l~i,. • . ,,.,
!i:, .• .-:=-"''~
L E A
I ~\ :
,.
· "~ r' ----7"
. J

I .~--\'=--+
. = ..

--1r-· .

_

..

1

I

Jnl.. I ,~1:1:
-

!S=====

·~k...

---·

~rc:7,--r- ""

1

-=""'~·_J"

-

~

s H •: 1

.....
.•

c:n·" . ,.

l i····~
, ---~:~;,-. ,,....J'i

,a

F

.

1

1

.

•

,,L---J--.- \.,--

I

I .

-------

I

100[=:T - -~': . . D

'

11

.:-~

~~B.±-~
,

.

E

j..

l

I

S"

LJ . : . E
\" . ·:. . I[ ., i .

I.,

~

---~ ,,--- ' l

. : . i···-

"
t

"B

.

~

i

· I I~-·

-~

--·1

~

N

•

..

u

u

..

..

HIDDEN

.

T

'

- - - -•• - - -

\ .

. . " - ., .°'I·-:.;~--I□\ .T--~1l~------p

1

~ ~ L' J L _ ,r7r---7
___JI

~·-

,, - - -T
•

11

R

A

v

d

a

E

'

_

5
+

~

---i\"

---,.

A.

•

~

,.

'\\

I ::

v

I

E

\\\\

,,

I

)"---

,,

1

I

~~~~~~\~,
::

I

~r[\·-.:/~-

trj?

\!-,

I

."

\: :';=====7rj --·-t--·--;
: ,:"~---.,:l i:
\~-- ~

1

I

;

,,

I\~

I

l. ~~--

I

II

::

t?

~~

!

T. 38 N.

i

CD!\\
-='

1 ='

'

,,
1:,__

V .l[ J
E W

_,{I

I

f]fl

,.,_J~l
:J

~ - !.

4J

&lt;

7DIT
'7

,_

&lt;l;

....,

L I TT L E

.

TR A VER S E

B A

-~
N
--D

r

,-~1·1r
IG:::'J\~ ~~
~JI" ; 7 ~
; .
I

L,

L. ..~ - -I

.

~ ..e--- --+ - •

-1 - ~

s

•

..

•

,

___: _

.,

l..___

"

l "

.

.
" I
-o-[

rG; . . .

, _.: : i'.·7□·:
_j

" ~ ·· ~
. . ttjl

' /

T'. ' . .. . .,--,
i :I .

. .
- ~'v.---

.i

....
. ..

.

~~.. .. ~_ Olr"JI
,·,"

\\ .0v;•f

n

H

'--·

1

,... .

_j

COUNTY
R. !!W.

R . 6W

R ••

LEGE N D
~
1'H[

o,

..

PIOl[PA ■ A1'10H

•

TIii$ ,.. ,.,. 1"011 l1'1[ [MW[T

C0UNll fL.OOtlNG C0lilMtSSI0H WI.$ r1N• ... cto . , ..
GII.UtT
l1'4[ fAlt !ij [lt's HOii[ &amp;OMINlSTR.t.TION '
UN11'(0 SlAT[S DEPIIIIHHlrlT
.t.GIIICULfUR[ •ll70 ·11

,~o•

l(&amp; L [

or

~

PROBABLE fU T URE SERV I CE AREAS
PROPOSED fUTURE WELLS
TENTATIVE FUTURE SERVICE AREAS
·IASED ON PROJECTED LAND USE .
( ENGINEERING FEASIIILITY NECESSARY
TO DETERMINE SPECIFIC SERVICE AREA
80UNDARIESJ

Ill

f l:l t

vilicon · lemon a assoc. inc.
planninQ
con1ullants
MCNAMEE PORTER &amp; SEELEY
CONSULTING
ENG INEERS

I

FUTURE COMMUNITY WATER SERVICE
EMMET

T 3 ~N

COUNTY

T S4N

�Harbor Point and Wequetonsing have contracted with the City of Harbor
Springs for waste water treatment. Waste water from the Conway area
will a l so be treated at the authority's facility . The area to be
served by the authority is shown on the map "Future Water and Sewer
Serv ic e Area''. The treatment facility is designed to serve a population of 2,500 in the winter and 4,500 in the summer to the 1990
des i gn year o
Prior t o the design of both the Petoskey and Harbor Springs - Little
Trav er se Township Projects, McNamee, Porter and Seeley, acting f8r
t he City of Petoskey, and Williams and Works, acting for the Authority,
worked jointly on a study of the feasibility of incorporating the two
proposed t reatment facilities into one larger facility which would
serv e t he entire area. A number of possibilities were studies, but
due to the distance between Harbor Springs and Petoskey and the
relatively little development between the two Cities, it was found
to be more economical to proceed independently as planned.
Alanson and Littlefield Township
Due to the problems previously discussed around Crooked Lake and along
the Cr ooked River, the Village of Alanson and Littlefield Township
hav e jointly obtained the services of Williams and Works for the
purpose of making a study for waste water collection and treatment.
Wor k on this study was begun just recently and no recommendations
have been presented to date.
Some of the possibilities being considered by the engineers are:

.,
J

J

l o

Alanson and Littlefield Township joining the Harbor Springs Littl e Trav erse Authority with the waste water from this area
being treated at the Authority's proposed facility.

2o

Alan s on and Littlefield Township contracting with the Authority
for waste water treatment at the Authority's facility.

3o

Al anson and Littlefield Township either joining or contracting
with the Authority and the Authority treating the waste water
fr om this area at a second treatment facility to be cons t r u cted in Littlefield Township.

4o

Alanson and Littlefield Township remaining independent from the
Harbor Springs - Little Traverse Authority and constructing
the i r own waste water treatment facility .

Regar dless of the results of the engineer's study as to the most
feasib l e and economical method, it is encouraging that the Village
of Al ans on and Littlefield Township recognize the present problems
and are taking steps to eliminate them .

-

70 -

�Mackinaw City
The firm of Johnson and Anderson, Consulting Engineers for Mackinaw
City, are preparing plans and specifications for a new waste water
treatment facility which is to be constructed in the near future.
Current plans are to abandon the existing treatment_ plant and pump
the waste wat er to a new treatment facility to be located on a 60
a cre s ite southwest of the City . Treatment will be by lagoons
with d isinfection and spray irrigation.
Storage will be provided
for the waste water for 6 months during the winter . The facility
will serv e the area within Mackinaw City only . The design is based
on serving a population of 6,000 people in the year 1985 .

J
J

The proposed facilities for Petoskey, Harbor Springs - Little Traverse
Township and Mackinaw City will have a design capacity to serve a
t otal of 29,500 people, which is nearly 50% greater than the 1990 projected year-round population of Emmet County .
Should Alanson and
Littlefield Township provide waste water collection and treatment,
the abov e total capacity of treatment facilities will be even greater.
A very high percentage of the present population will be provided with
waste wat er collection services and the areas most likely to experi ence t he majority of the future population growth will already
hav e been provided with this utility.
Although the Village of Pellston is not planning sewer improvements
at the present time, it is recommended that they be considered in
the near future, should financial assistance be available. It is
dou b tful t hat the Village could fund such a project without assistance . 1
There a r e many programs available, both Federal and State, which would
pay a substantial portion of the project cost.
Even with assistance
it is often d ifficult, if not impossible, for small communities to
finance ~he remaining portion .

J

Was t e wat er treatment facilities are becoming increasingly more expens iv e as more stringent treatment requirements are adopted by the
gov ernmental agencies. For example, treatment by lagooning has been
a common ly used method for small communities, as construction cost
was relatively low and very little maintenance or operations was requir ed . But then it became a requirement that lagoons could discharge
into t he r eceivi ng body of water but twice each year, once in the
spring and once in the fall . Thus, it was necessary to design lago0ns
larger t o pr ovi de for six months storage. It then became a

1

]

-

A l a r ge pr ivat e recreati on and housing development (approximately
200 unit s ) is being planned in an area south of Pellston .
If the
dev e lopment materializes, it would be desirable to consider the
feasibility of a joint community sewage treatment serv ice.

- 71 -

�-

requirement that all effluent from lagoons would be chlorinated for
disinfection and this increased the initial cost and required more
attention to operation.
It is now a requirement that 80
percent of the total phosphates in the incoming waste water be removed by the treatment.
The lagoon type treatment process is not
adaptable to phosphate removal so that the method most commonly used
is to follow the lagoon treatment with spray irrigationo A large
amount of additional land is required, an extensive network of spray
piping increases the maintenance required, and additional fencing,
tree planting and other requirements of the Health Department make
this type of treatment much more expensive than in the past.
It would be desirable to have all the dwellings in the County provided with waste water collection and treatment.
But it is not
economically feasible even with substantial financial aid.
It is
recommended that the remainder of the County continue with private
septic tanks and drain fields at the present. As further development occurs or as potential problems arise, additional sewer systems
should be studied.
Some rural areas that may require sewage services
because of increasing development and therefore increasing volumes
of sewage effluent include: Walloon Lake, Paradise Lake, Larks Lake,
Mackinaw Shores, Cross Village and the Ski Resort areas in Pleasantview Township . Demands in the rural Townships of West Traverse, Friendship, Readmond, Cross Village, Bliss and Wawatam would probably arise
in areas along the Lake Michigan shore. The other Townships may
remain more rural, and services may never be feasible except in a
few instances where concentrated development may occur or increase.
Levering, Carp Lake, Brutus and Van may be affected under these
conditions .
Springv ale Township could have some potential utility
service area near Crooked Lake and Pickerel Lake.

COMMUNITY WATER SYSTEMS
Safe and abundant drinking water is a most fundamental requirement
to our existence. There are two sources available for obtaining
this water. These are surface water sources such as lakes and river,
and ground water sources such as artesian and drilled wells. Although
there is an abundance of high quality surface water sources in Emmet
County all domestic water is obtained from wells. Petoskey, Harbor
Springs, Mackinaw City, Hidden Hamlet and Boyne Highlands all have
existing distribution systems. Pellston does not have a public water
system but does have wells and a cistern for fire protection. Alanson
has cisterns for fire protection also. The following is a discussion
of water s u pply and distribution in the County.

J

-,
.J

-

72 -

�Petoskey Water System
The present area served by the City of Petoskey water system is shown
on the "Existing C0mrnunity Water Service" map.
The water is supplied
by an infiltration well, 17 feet deep, and a pumping station located
on the shore of Little Traverse Bay within the City. The water is
chlorinated and fluoridated prior to entering the distribution system.
Storage is provided by one new 300,000 gallon steel elevated storage
tank, two 150,000 gallon concrete ground storage reservoirs and one
110,000 gallon steel standpipe, 40 feet tall.
The new 300,000 gallon
elevated tank is supplied by three high level pumps at the pumping
station on the lake shore .
These three pumps each have a capacity
of 600 gallons per minute at 500 feet total head. Also at the pumping station are located three 600 gallons per minute low level pumps
which serve the main part of the City and also supply the two 150,000
gallon ground storage reservoirs.
The water is pumped again from the
ground storage reservoirs to maintain the level in the standpipe
which supplies a second high level district , The location of the
pumping station and storage facilities are also shown on the "Existing
Community Water Service" map .

J

J
.,

It is believed that the infiltration well is recharged from ground
water flowing from the south, rather than from Little Traverse Bay,
as the level in this well is normally above that in the Bay.
This
is somewhat substantiated by the complete chemical analysis of the
City's water which is presented in TABLE 18. A surface water supply
would not be expected to have a total hardness as high as 170 parts
per million.
The Petoskey water supply is of a good quality as can
be seen from a comparison of TABLE 18 with the Water Quality Goals and
Drinking Water Standards listed in TABLE 19. The Water Quality Goals
were established in 1967 by the American Water Works Association
(A.W.W . A. ) as an outline of the characteristics of a treated water
of a high quality.
The Drinking Water Standards were established by
the United States Public Health Service (U.S.P.H.S.) in 1962 and are
endorsed by the A.W.W.A. as minimum standards for all public water
supplies , The water is fairly hard but not so much as to warrant
a softening plant at the present time .

J
.,
]

J
,,,,
:-,

J

- 73 -

�~

I

j

TABLE 18
PETOSKEY, MICHIGAN
COMPLETE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
(parts per million)
Determination

Resu l t

Determination

Color units
Odor
Turbidity units
Total solids
Silica-SIO 2
Manganese-Mn
Iron as Fe
Magnesium-MG
Sodium-Na
Calcium-Ca

0
None

Potassium-K
Nitrate-NO 3
Chloride-CI
Sulphate-SO 4
Bicarbonate-HCO3
Carbonate-CO 3
Fluoride-F
Hardness-CaCO3
Hydrogen ion-pH
Conductance-Micromhos

0
216
4
0
0.1
11
8.1

so

Result
1. 2
1. 2
16

29
170
0
0.30
170
7.4
375

TABLE 19
A oWoWoAo WATER QUALITY GOALS
U. S . P.H oSo DRINKING WATER STANDARDS
(parts per million)

j

,

..,

]

Determination
Color units
Odor
Turbid i ty units
Total solids
Iron as Fe
Manganese-Mn
Nitrate-NO3
Chloride-CI
Sulphate SO 4
Hardness
Flu oride

A . W. W. A. WATER
Quality Goals

15

3

None
0.1
200
0 . 05

OoOl
45
250
250
80
0 6-1. 2
0

]

]

U.S . P.HoS, Drinking
Water Standards

- 74 -

3
5

500
0. 3
0. 0 5
45

250
250

�1

Harbor Spr in~s
The Harb or Springs water system is supplied by four wells and one
335,000 gallon ground storage reservoir. The wells are:

II

j

Name

Depth

Capacity

Stadium Well
Bu l l Moose Well
Peffer Well
State Well

160
90
180
160

750
430
330
330

feet
feet
feet
feet

gpm
gpm
gpm
gpm

In a 1 966 revision of the City's Master Plan by Williams and Works,
it was recommended that three additional wells be installed in the
future o The locations of the existing and proposed future wells
and the ground storage reservoir are shown on the "Existing Community Water Ser•v ice" map o The area served by the system is also
shown on t he "Existing Community Water Service" map.

1
1

A complete chemical analysis of the
shown in TABLE 20 0 The water is of
is quite hard t here is no manganese
not chlorinated at the present time

Harbor Springs water supply is
a good quality and although it
or iron present. The water is
but fluoride is added.

TABLE 20
HARBOR SPRINGS, MICHIGAN
COMPLETE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
(parts per million)
Determination
Color u nits
Odor
Turbidity units
Total solids
Silica-SIO 3
Iron as Fe
Manganese-Mn
Calcium-Ca
Magne s ium-Mg
Sodium-Na

Result
0
None
0
210
8

o. o

0 0
48
16
0

L4

Determination

Result

Potassium-K
Nitrate-NO
Chloride-Ci
Sulphate-SO4
Bicarbonate-HCO3
Carbonate-CO3
Hardness-CaCO3
Fluoride-F
Hydrogen ion-pH
Conductance Micromhos

0. 5
12
0
7
210
0
185
0.30
7. 3
370

J

J
-

75 -

�Mack i naw City
One 8- i nch well approximately 200 feet deep and one 10-inch well 296
feet deep supply water to the Mackinaw City system .
It is estimated
by the City that these wells hav e ov er double the capacity of that
being utilized at the present time.
Storage is provided by one 100,000
gallon elev ated storage tank . The existing service area, wells and
storage tank are shown on the "Existing Community Water Service" map.

j

There hav e been problems in the past with an odor from the water caused
by hydro gen sulfide, but this has been successfully eliminated by
c hlori natio n o The water is not fluoridated .

TABLE 21
MACKINAW CITY, MICHIGAN
COMPLETE CHEMICAL ANALYSIS OF WATER
(parts per million)
Determi nation
Color units
Odor
Turbidity units
Total solids
Silica-S I O4
Iron as Fe
Manganese-Mn
Calcium-Ca
Magnesium-Mg
Sodium-Na

Results
5
None
2. 0
290
10
0. 2
0. 0
68
17
4

Determination
Potassium-K
Nitrate-NO3
Chloride-CI
Sulphate-SO4
Bicarbonate-HCO 3
Carbonate-co
Hardness-CaC 3
Fluoride-F
Hydrogen ion-pH
Conductance Micromhos

8

Results
0. 5

o. oo
4
19
220
0
240
0. 3
7.9
460

The complete chemical anal ysis of one of the wells, given in TABLE
21, shows the water to be very hard.
When this analysis is compared
to TABLE 19, with respect to total solids and iron, the water will
not meet A .W.W. A. Water Quality Goals, but it is well within the
U. S . P . H.S. Drinking Water Standards.
Boyne High l ands
Boyne High l ands operates its own private water system which is supplied
by one 6-inch wel l and one 8- inch well, each of approximately 250 gallons per minute capacity, and one 10-inch well that i s 650 gallons per
minut e c apacity .
Storage is provided b y a 2,000 gallon reservoir . The
water i s r eport ed t o be of a v ery go0d quality .

J
- 76 -

�,r

Hidden Hamlet

i

...-------

1

...-------

...-------

--

There is an existing water system in Hidden Hamlet, a development of
recreational homes located directly north of the Nubs Nob ski area .
The system is privately owned and operated by the Hidden Hamlet property owners. The system has no fire hydrants and fire protection is
provided by the City of Harbor Springs.
The system is supplied by
four 4-inch wells and one 6-inch well.
Present pumping capacity is
420 gallons per minute and the total capacity of the existing wells
is estimated to be over 700 gallons per minute, A 4,000 gallon ground
storage reservoir provides storage for the system .
L'Arbre Croche
This new development on Little Traverse Bay between Petoskey and
Harbor Springs is constructing a private water system which is to
be supplied by two 350 feet deep wells.
The new system will be
hydro-pneumatic.
Pellston
Although the Village of Pellston does not have a public water supply,
the Village does have three wells for fire protection . Two of these
wells are approximately 40 feet deep and the third is approximately
125 feet deep. The Village also has a 20,000 gallon cistern which
is used for fire protection .
Remainder of Emmet County
Wequetonsing and Harbor Point have water systems supplied by the City
of Harbor Springs.
Bay View also has a water system and is included
in the Petoskey service area,
The remaining area of the County is
served by private wells.
Logs of the wells drilled in Emmet
from the District Health Officer .
well logs . All Townships in Emmet
TABLE with the exception of Center
in 1970 0

County during 1970 were obtained
TABLE 22 is a tabulation of these
County are represented in the
Township which had no new wells

J

J
J
- 77 -

�-

7
TABLE 22
WELLS DRILLED IN EMMET COUNTY IN 1970

Township

....-

Bear Creek
Bliss
Carp Lake
Cross Village
Friendship
Littlefield
Little Trav erse
Maple Ri v er
McKinley
Pleasantvi ew
Readmond
Reso rt
Springv ale
Wawatam
West Traverse

Na o of
Wells
7
1
2
4
2
45
2
3
1
2
4
3
2
1

Least
Depth(ft o)

Greatest
Depth(ft .)

29

145

62
57
135
51
51
170
43

169
190
185
13 8
233
206
62

66
140
69
121

9 41 80
148
1 85
Av erage Depth

....-

..J

J
J

-

Total Wells

Average
Depth(ft.)
93
210
116
120
160
91
169
188
53
370
80
164
109
153
225
153

43

Thirty-nine of the wells list ed in TABLE 22 were constructed with 4-inch casings and the remaining four were constructed with 2-inch casings.
The varying topography within the County is illustrated by the
large range in depths of t he wells . Twenty-four of the new wells were
constructed in the six southerly Townships in the Cou nty o The logs
for these twenty-four wells indicate a clay layer of v arying thickness
and dep t h throughout most of this area . This is a desirable condition
as the clay layer acts to seal of and protect the aquifer from possib l e contamination from th e surface. The majority of these wells
draw water from a sand or grav el aquifer while a few of the deeper
wells were in shale .
Fourteen of the wells listed i n TABLE 22 were construct ed in the central
seven Townships of the Count y .
Clay and clay mixtures of sand and
grave l wer e found throughout most of the depth of these wells with
the wat er bearing strata be ing sand or gr a v el.
No rock was en countered
in any of the fourteen wells o
The remaining fi v e wells we r e constructed in the three most northerly
Townships in Emmet County . Two of the fiv e were drilled to water
bearing limestone and the other three to sand or grav el o Clay materials
were reported throughou t most of the depth o~ four of th e five wells.

- 78 -

�A.l though the wells listed in TABLE 22 cover but a small portion of the
wells within the County, they do indicate that potable water is readily
available from ground water sources in Emmet County.
Lake Michigan and
Little Traverse Bay are also available as a source for public water
supply but, to date, have not been utilized. This is not unusual as
the costs of inlet structures and long intake lines in the lake are
usually prohibitive to small communities.
It is not unlikely that as
the City of Petoskey's population grows and as Resort and Bear Creek
Townships develop that Little Traverse Bay may be utilized as a rater
source for this area in the future.
FUTURE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEMS
It is recommended that the existing water distribution systems in
Petoskey, Harbor Springs and Mackinaw City be extended as required
in the future to serve the areas approximating those to be served
by their waste water treatment facilities.
However, certain problems
will be encountered in expanding the present sys~ems.
Due to the
varying terrain of the County, booster pumping stations and reservoirs
will be required to maintain adequate pressures in the areas at the
higher elevations.
Due to the previously mentioned potential problems within the Village
of Pellston, caused by the small lot sizes, it is recommended that
consideration be given to a public water supply for the Village. As
safe drinking water is a necessity, it is recommended that a water
system be given priority over waste water collection and treatment
facilities . Construction of a water system also has the advantage
of increased fire protection.
It is recommended that a public water
system also be considered in Alanson. However, a waste water
collection system should have top priority at the present time.
As there is an abundance of potable ground water available, the
remainder of the County should remain with private wells. As these
rural areas develop, a water system, as with a sewer system, should
be considered a necessary part of that development.

J

If community sewage services are not feasible in the more rural County
areas, then water services may have to be provided when significant
increases in development occur . The need may be prompted at an earlier
time if the capacity of the soils to absorb septic tank effluent is
exceeded o Areas that may require central wa~er systems first, will
likely be in resort locations, particularly water oriented sites .
These may include: Walloon Lake, Paradise Lake, Crooked Lake, Larks
Lake, Mackinaw Shores, Cross Village and the Townships which have
frontage on Lake Michigan. At least some limited need could be experienced in any one of the rural Townships of Bliss, Carp Lake,
Center, Cross Village, Friendship, Readmond, Springvale~ McKinley,
Maple River, Pleasant View and Wawatam.
The communities of Alanson,
Pellston, Carp Lake, Levering, Brutus, Van, Oden, Conway, Bay Shore
and other locations may develop needs at an earlier time.

- 79 -

�.,

{

t~ ( i 1

r-= C

t i

.J

,--: { •

~·

-~·

'

j

,·

·1990 SERVICE
C £C I

- ~ ..W
~~

L

AREA

r

B A

~

PRO'l\OSED TREATMENT PLANT
T.ltN,

:JI ~

A

B A

T

1'

~f

If

A

·------r;::::=

",,,,,,
,,,.
l\

sTUl?GEON

r

-.'~:,.

-h.J "'

---...&lt;
I ---j,r•

II

II

.

LJL□
□
~----□·[]
~ "~~---~
~

~

e.J•J

~
('.)

'

H

ti

•

I

I

11

C ••

T. 51N.

l--"~ ,_,

'

,,,,,,,

:

'
't

!

(.,

c
r•
t
_llJ
:
'
I
I~
•[L•JiJc.~• !c • □
·\

'
~

✓[
dz::r71 .·s=JpP□----~- - · ~

\

J

A

D

M

:

N

I

D

I

•

:- l .

\~

·

~ -- ~ \

C

.

1·

"

. ·

i

.

I

.

"

.

I

"

'

I. .-.
I

, . I;

N ::t D

E

S

' ,1

"_J

H "I: - ~

p --

[

11

'

&gt;

•

,'I

•

TI

I

'
:K

MC

~ J~~
' 1

i

.,.

,

•

i

;I"--===-'"-"'~--•

•

I

c"

1J .
.., •

-

(

,.-·

! ··

~
...

c __ ____ Jlr==7"b~
.., t !

IL==='---=:!~:

•

·Jv . lLJ
]□
7d'□"
•

"

•

IOI ~- . I

-

+

•

=-·

/'~

'

"

I

,= \ - ~

w'

E

,·,,

i

•

u □.□[I

l=rl -l ' -~-~·------~--T·-----i
t--- . ,-· lJ. . . ..i 7
,
_:DO! ' .
· t ·

--~-J

•

~, -t
•

:

j "

•

"

l

1

»

~I

"

~-hi

-

---··

n. - ------_....
'

•

-

___,, --~---F-----" ' ~~·,, \I

L

•

[L ___:

S

.

\\ - --=:==;,:-

➔

\

1E

: ,:, •
I

,,~

t

11

;::.,,.,,.

,~,

~:..---.,-,

I

1I

t--- ----t-I --··l,;,a

11\

I . ~

T. MN

I

ii

V

E

_j, .

::i---

I, T

•

!;-

.
.
·
1 \
. 1:,i

,.

.---,

'

f==-,
~~·-·-==1~=~=11•
::--~~~~:

.

-,,--- _______ _J\

~

T. 37N,

1

y

E

L

N

'

ILJ.

;

I

"

-iii----'-- _

i1·

..

~

~-

~ - - ,~

.
,:
-=~
~
I ~
"
"-L"
~ :i

'I

\

I

I

+

.

-C

cl=-•1•.•"]o••--,~,t t_ __' ,]
'

__ _J

"L--JI

-

----,--

..: . " l .

:

-~]
--r

-

O

1,

I• - --;=='='•~!'==--~~---: __ _]~
I

.

'·

E

.□
u□
•
---- D

¥u,A11'

. Ir&lt;

~.-.I-!

'. \!• • " ·)c• Jr7-fl - -'-'----\ ---,,---4
• • LlJ .
' -·- i
1\
~

'

'

~-~~

I

"

1

~•

.

1

'

F

\

D
.
r~
-•··•·.... ~•· r -l~ -;
~~
u.. . ·
· :· ·'
JQ;\1.
rh· -· ··r:;

.
.lf-b.'----'

Ml.OIL(

I

:r,1
11

\L-1'i1

~ --~-- -·-----

,, ..~,

Ill

,111. - -

, "

:11 .

. l,.t,J;;;:,;-1t

..I.

B~(
~ I!: ~

--1._ _ _

!

: "''"..

~ c___,,,,.,._J

l..,

i

T 3!5N.

,-----.;(

""
~

LITTLE

-.J

Tl?AVE l? SE

8

A

r

~ J::j\:,,, ~((n•·
r==~
. . t[j~----:
- -i

o•:•:[
~ ;aa!
-r~fi
II~

.

REA

~-- t~l~J_··_

~Fl t,-1
....~

E

!t.. ,.

-

K

_

_J1

·-

·

I

~ a\

---7

:

1,1:,,:f"

17\\ :,'(

I

"

U·Gu:J·,
-~

!!""'

~I_..../,

'

..

'

.

G

PROPOSEO WASTEWATER TREATMENT PLANT

PROPOSED WAJOR SANITARY SEWERS

t ·:·':':·:·:·::';:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·:·::j PROPOSED 1990 SERVICE AREAS
PROPOSEO 2000 SERVICE AREAS

..

1•11s ... , ,011 ,Ht [ Mlit tT

Wlla

COUNT¥ f'LollOIINO C0011 1lllS10N WA$ flN AN ttO · • I.
.IIANT flt0 1t TH[ fA ll .. (ll 'S NO•t A0Ml,.IITIUTl0N ,

u,ollO

nuts

01:,.,11, ... c111 c, ..,ucu1.1u1tt • l9l'O · fl

S CALI

UI

TE NTATIVE F UTURE SERVICE AREAS
- BA SED ON PROJEC TED LAND US E.
( ENGINEERING FE A SIBILI TY N ECESSARY
TO OET ERMINE SPECIFIC SERVICE AR EA
BOUNDARIES.)

fl('T

vilicon · leman a assoc. inc.
planninQ
consultants
MCNAMEE PORTER &amp; SEELEY
CON SULTING
ENGINEERS

I

FUTURE SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
EMMET

COUNTY

A

\~

- - - - - PROPOSED MAJOR P UMPING MAINS

o,

V

L

_1E

~

____:

"

~
~~ -

LEGEND

o,t .-11t ....11 .. 1,011

-~~'

COUNTY
R 4W

-----

~
"

,·••' ',,,? •

T. 34N.

SW

■

..

�,......

-I

A P P E ND I X

.....-

,
j

�LJ

l_j

L:::J

~

~

l_J

l_J

I__J

Ld

\_J

l-1

I__J

\_J

\_J

l__J

l_J

L-1

APPENDIX TABLE 1
EXISTING LAND USE
SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 1
Emmet County
Bliss

Carp
Lake

Cross
Village

Readmond

TOTAL

--

Mackinaw
City(Pt)

DISTRICT
TOTAL

Residential

57

95

26

48

226

32

258

Seasonal Homes

14

90

30

30

164

30

194

Public Uses

85

9

2

2

98

39

137

2

97

4

4

107

17

124

Recreation

6,960

53

5

12

7,030

15

Commercial

1

32

2

8

43

20

Industrial

3

12

-

-

15

41

Railroads

-

8

-

-

8

14

422

392

197

458

1,469

--

145

1,614
17%

7,544

788

266

562

9,160ac .

353

9,513ac.
100%

3%
2%
1%
Quasi-Public

►
I
I-'

1%
7,045
74%
63
1%
56
1%
22
•

Roads
TOTALS

SOURCE:

Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc .

9.:0

Land Use Inventory, Summer, 1968,

\_J

I

�~

~

L..:J

L....:::-J

l__J

l_J

l_J

L..d

l_J

l_J

l_l

LJ

LI

L.J

'-'

LI

APPENDIX TABLE 2
EXISTING LAND USE
SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 2
Emmet County

Center

I

I'-)

Maple River

TOTAL

Pellston

DISTRICT
TOTAL

Residential

55

79

76

210

82

292

Seasonal Homes

32

4

6

42

-

42

Public Uses

63

1,450

9

1,522

16

3

6

7

16

2

Recreation

11

2

1

14

6

Commercial

1

12

28

41

5

Industrial

12

6

30

48

7

-

65

63

128

14

99

351

465

915

16

Quasi-Public

::i&gt;

McKinle_z

Railroads
Roads

TOTAL

SOURCE:

276

-1,975

685

Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc .

-2,936ac.

148

9%
1%
1,538
50%
18
1%
20
1%
46
1%
55
2%
142
5%
931
30%
3,084ac.
100%

Land Use Inventory, Summer, 1968

~

L-1

1

1

�I
APPENDIX TABLE 3
EXISTING LAND USE
SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO. 3
I:mmet County

Friendshi,E_

Little
Traverse

Pleasantview

West
Traverse

Residential

46

145

12

55

258

173

431

Seasonal Homes

60

105

28

68

261

NIA

261

Public Uses

6

131

27

31

195

16

211

Quasi-Public

9

155

1,984

97

2,245

18

Recreation

1

3

-

-

4

47

29

1

32

62

32

TOTAL

Harbor
SErings

DISTRICT
TOTAL
9%
6%

::i:,.
I

w

.)

5%
2,263
47%
51
1%
94
2%
207
4%

Commercial

(

Industrial

10

180

2

15

207

-

447

343

80

246

1,116

144

1,260
26%

579

1,091

2,134

544

4,348ac .

430

4,778ac.
100%

Railroads
Roads
TOTAL

SOURCE:
Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc.
NIA - Not available

Land Use Inventory, Summer, 1968

~

1

�!___JI

l._JJ

I_

APPENDIX TABLE 4
EXISTING LAND USE
SUPERVISOR DISTRICT NO.4
Emmet County

Littlefield

Alanson

99

221

81

82

65

147

7

175

14

189

7

92

106

198

-

Recreation

7

5

12

10

Commercial

8

1

9

13

Industrial

2

12

14

-

52

-

52

13

378

550

928

51

Seasonal
Public Uses
Quasi-Public
+

TOTAL

122

Residential

►
I

Springvale

Railroads
Roads

DISTRICT
TOTAL
302
16%
154
8%
196
10%
198
10%
22
1%
22
1%
14
1%
65
3%
979
50%

--

TOTAL

SOURCE:

918

Vilican-Leman

853

l,77oac.

&amp; Associates, Inc .

182

l,952ac.
100%

Land Use Inventory, Summer, 1968

j

�I

APPENDIX TABLE 5
EXISTING LAND USE
SUPERVISOR DISTRICTS NO'S 5-11
Emmet County

Bear Creek
Residential

0,

TOTAL

· Peto·skey

335

142

477

335

98

66

164

-

Public Uses

333

20

353

76

Quasi-Public

186

2

188

264

Recreation

298

14

312

128

Commercial

64

19

83

59

Industrial

10

150

160

66

Railroads

116

70

186

61

Roads

909

504

1,413

279

2,349

987

3,336ac.

Seasonal Homes

►
I

Resort

TOTAL

SOURCE :

Vi lican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc .

1,268

DISTRICT
TOTAL
812
18%
164
4%
429
9%
452
10%
440
9%
142
3%
226
5%
247
5%
1,692
37%
4,604ac.
100 %

Land Use Inventory , Summer, 1968

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008111">
                <text>Emmet-County_Comprehensive-Plan-for-Sewer-and-Water-Facilities_1971</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008112">
                <text>Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008113">
                <text>McNamee, Porter &amp; Seeley</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008114">
                <text>1971-04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008115">
                <text>Comprehensive Plan for Sewer and Water Facilities</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008116">
                <text>The Comprehensive Plan for Sewer and Water Facilities was prepared by Vilican-Leman &amp; Associates, Inc. and McNamee, Porter &amp; Seeley in April 1971. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008117">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008118">
                <text>Emmet County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008119">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008121">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008122">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008123">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008124">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038313">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54687" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58958">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/175b26bb9e66e031e67ef92d87f259af.pdf</src>
        <authentication>ddb5544262464a645b9226393a3803c0</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008110">
                    <text>Solon Township

Bingham Township

01

06

05

04

12

07

08

09

13

18

17

16

24

19

20

21

25

30

29

28

36

31

32

33

West
Grand Traverse
Bay

27

Grand Traverse County

--

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF ELMWOOD

Zoning Districts

Agricultural - Rural (A-R)
Residential 1 (R-1)
Residential 2 (R-2)
Residential 3 (R-3)

--

Manufactured Home Park (MHP)
Rural Resort (RR)

Municipal Center (MC)

Neighborhood Commercial (NC)

--

General Commercial (GC)
Light Industrial (LI)

Shoreline Commercial (SC)
Traverse City

Conditional Rezoning

Official Zoning Map
September 1, 2017

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008096">
                <text>Elmwood-Twp_Zoning-Map_2017</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008097">
                <text>2017-09-01</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008098">
                <text>Charter Township of Elmwood Official Zoning Map</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008099">
                <text>The Charter Township of Elmwood Official Zoning Map was created on September 1, 2017.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008100">
                <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008101">
                <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008102">
                <text>Elmwood Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008103">
                <text>Leelanau County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008104">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008106">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008107">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008108">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008109">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038312">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54686" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58957">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/bb20b6516ba72d899ef0d8228cf84472.pdf</src>
        <authentication>e932c1d0357dbe37553e7e6affb4d0b7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008095">
                    <text>Waterfront District Master Plan
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

I.

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................................................... 1
COMMUNITY AND SITE INVESTIGATION................................................................................................... 1
Region and District ..................................................................................................................................................... 1
Marina Site ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2
Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................................................................. 3
Public Design Preferences ........................................................................................................................................ 4
ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED ........................................................................................................................... 5
Waterfront District ...................................................................................................................................................... 5
Township Marina Site ................................................................................................................................................ 6
RECOMMENDED PLAN ........................................................................................................................................... 7
District Improvements Framework Plan.............................................................................................................. 7
Marina Master Plan..................................................................................................................................................... 8
IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY ....................................................................................................................... 10
Key Ideas for Moving Forward .............................................................................................................................. 11
Potential Funding Sources...................................................................................................................................... 12
Specific Next Steps ................................................................................................................................................... 14

LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Land Use
Figure 2: Access Management and Right-of-Way Improvements
Figure 3: Natural Features
Figure 4: Public Design Preferences #1
Figure 5: Public Design Preference #2
Figure 6: Public Design Preference #3
Figure 7: Public Design Preference #4
Figure 8: Public Design Preference #5
Figure 9: Public Design Preference #6
Figure 10: Waterfront District Plan Alternative A
Figure 11: Waterfront District Plan Alternative B
Figure 12: Waterfront District Plan Alternative C
Figure 13: Marina Concept Alternative A
Figure 14: Marina Concept Alternative B
Figure 15: Marina Concept Alternative C
Figure 16: Framework Plan
Figure 17: Marina Improvement Preferred Plan P1
Figure 18: Marina Improvement Preferred Plan P2
Figure 19: District Improvements Framework Plan
Figure 20: Marina Master Plan
Figure 21: Marina Plan Suggested First Phase

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012
INTRODUCTION
In the fall of 2011 the Elwood Township board selected JJR, a site planning and engineering firm specializing
in waterfront redevelopment and community planning, to prepare a plan for the M-22 waterfront corridor
through Elmwood, an area referred to as Greilickville.
The planning effort had two primary objectives:
•

•

Examine the waterfront highway corridor and develop a set of recommendations to transform the
area by encouraging new development, improving pedestrian safety, and creating a more village like
atmosphere for the area.
Prepare a site plan for the township marina property along M-22 that illustrates improvements to
boater facilities, clearer use patterns for visitors and boaters, and integration of the facilities into the
adjacent park and community.

The planning team hosted a number of workshops with community members and local stakeholders to solicit
input into the needs and priorities for the area. Initial meetings in late September 2011 focused on
developing a comprehensive list of goals and objectives for the project area, identifying the program elements
that need to be included on the marina site and overall district, and gaining an understanding of community
preferences as to the desired character of the area once the improvements are made. Based on the results of
these workshops a series of alternative concept plans were prepared at the district-wide scale, as well for the
marina site, and these planning alternatives were the subject of a second series of meetings and workshops
where participants were asked to identify preferred ideas and plan elements.
Based on the results of these workshops the consultant team refined the plans for the marina site and overall
district into a comprehensive plan for improving the corridor. The resulting plan outlines specific
improvement recommendations and provides a strategy for funding and building the vision established by the
community.

COMMUNITY AND SITE INVESTIGATION
Region and District
Elmwood Township is located on the west arm of the Grand Traverse Bay at the base of the Leelanau
Peninsula. Immediately south of the Township is Traverse City, and M-22 connects the Township to the city
to the south and upper Leelanau Peninsula to the north. Elmwood Township is both a year round
residential community (with 4,267 residents according to the 2000 U.S. Census) and a tourism focused
destination that experiences a large number of visitors to the area during the summer months.
M-22 is the primary transportation thoroughfare in the Township and along the route the majority of the
local commercial enterprises are located. The commercial portion of the route south of Cherry Bend Road,
and the residential areas immediately surrounding it, are historical known as Greilickville, so named after
Godfrey Greilick who established a saw mill in the area in the 1850’s. The population of Greilickville is 1,915
people according to the 2000 U.S. Census, or about 45 percent of the total Township population.
Page 1 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

The M-22 corridor from the southern Township boundary north to Cherry Bend Road is approximately one
mile in length. Land uses along this stretch of the road include small commercial enterprises developed in a
suburban style of land use, independent restaurants, industrial producers of fuel, offices, non-profit
organizations, private and public marinas and public open space and parks. Most of the development in the
corridor is concentrated on the west side of the road, and much of the east side of the road is open to the
bay. A Land Use Plan (Figure 1) was prepared to illustrate the land use patterns, and also highlights
underutilized parcels of land which represent “Corridor Opportunities” which demonstrate the potential for
redevelopment.
The pattern of development experience along the corridor has resulted in a large number of curb cuts or
entry drives into local businesses. The curb cuts, in conjunction with limited and unappealing sidewalk
facilities, limited signalized intersections and high rates of travel on the road (posted speed is 45 miles per
hour) has resulted in a corridor that is not particularly pedestrian friendly both for pedestrians travelling
parallel to the road and for those crossing it. The rights-of-way along the road vary in width considerably
along the corridor, complicating the development of consistent road design improvements. This study
considered the attributes of the road and adjacent land uses and proposed a series of potential access
management and right-of-way improvements (refer to Figure 2) and these ideas formed the final design and
recommendations.
The road corridor is crossed by a number of small streams which hydrologically connect the large wetland
system west of the corridor to the bay. These streams, wetlands and contiguous wood lots are valuable
environmental assets, and are illustrated on Figure 3. The streams and wetlands pose a regulatory challenge
for development in the area, but their function in providing habitat and maintaining water quality of the bay
cannot be overstated.
Marina Site
The initial investigations also included a more detailed look at the condition and function of the existing
township marina, located at the northern part of the waterfront district. Some of the key observations
include:
•

•
•
•
•
•
•

The boat launch is a valuable part of the marina, and it experiences peak demand in the summer
months (e.g., on weekends and during the Cherry Festival) which result in traffic backing up onto
M-22.
Parking for boat trailers is generally adequate, except at the peak demand times.
Parking for slip renters and their guests is not adequate.
The adjacent township park was recently renovated and is an asset to the community and to the
marina site.
There is not enough area on the land side for boater activities.
The existing building facilities are disjointed in character and do not have a waterfront character.
Maintaining vehicular connections to the development site to the north for office users and
emergency vehicles is important.

Page 2 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

•

The open water near the ramp is important to maintain as space for boats to wait for the ramp to be
available.

Goals and Objectives
As part of the participatory planning process, community members were asked to assist in the preparation of
the goals and objectives for the waterfront district and the project site. These goals and objectives include:
A. PRESERVE VALUABLE ASSETS OF THE AREA
• Water quality/stream corridors/natural resources
• Discovery Center/cultural assets
• Marina/boat launch/park
• Deep water harbor/tall ships
• Area history
• Nighttime peace
B. ENHANCE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE WATER
• Views of water
• Connected waterfront promenade
• Fishing pier at marina or park
• Access along break water
• Access for non-motorized boaters
• Bicycle parking along water
C. IMPROVE CONNECTION AND SAFETY FOR VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIANS
• Pedestrian crossing of M-22
• Path along M-22 (north-south)
• Link to key assets and TART Trail
• Curb cut management
• Intersection upgrades (signals, roundabouts)
• Shared access drive
D. IMPROVE THE EXPERIENCE AT THE MARINA
• New harbormaster and marina day use facilities
• Clear circulation into/through marina
• Courtesy dock for visitor’s dinghies
• Enhance picnic/use areas
• Bicycle parking
• Fish cleaning station
• Shared parking opportunities, including off-site parking for overflow boat trailers
Page 3 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

•
•

Improve entrance drives
Provide for boat crane/haul out

E. CREATE A WATERFRONT DESTINATION AND BRAND
• 365-day experience
• Architecture/streetscape/landscape character
• Range of water/land based uses
• Linked, compelling, cohesive experience
• Interpretative opportunities
Public Design Preferences
During the public workshops a series of six graphic boards were presented (refer to Figures 4,5,6,7,8 and 9),
each filled with images and sketches of other projects which the design team has been involved. Meeting
participants were encouraged to express their preferences and dislikes and their input guided the development
of the Waterfront District Plan and Marina Improvement Plan.
Some of the key observations from this exercise include:
•
•
•
•
•

•
•

•

There is particular support for improving the crossing of M-22 for pedestrians through the
use of islands, special paving, lighting, and landscaping.
The streetscape design for M-22 must have an “up-north” character, and not repeat design
themes and ideas more appropriate to larger cities in the south.
Support was noted for installing new interpretive learning displays and improved signage and
banner systems.
Participants liked the idea of art in the district, and preferred that such art reflect a
waterfront theme.
There was discussion related to how the district identifies itself - Elmwood Township or
Greilickville. There appeared to be some preference for identifying the district as Elmwood
Township, but not complete consensus. Participants did like the Township signage program
and discussed expanding the system to cover more of the public amenities of the district.
Participants advocated for public access to the water as a promenade at the marina, and
more direct contact at the park.
People like the existing park buildings, and indicated that new facilities should not appear
too urban. Activities for families and children along the waterfront were supported, but
should not include management intensive, high activity uses like interactive water features or
carousels.
An outdoor performance space along the water was supported, though a concern was raised
about the noise levels generated by the highway.

Page 4 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

•

•
•

•

Strong support was expressed for a fish cleaning station, but given the hours of fishing and
the noise and odors, it was suggested that such a facility should not be too close to the boat
docks.
The marina building should be designed for flexible use, including use during the off-season
for other community purposes, and should be two stories in height.
The use of the waterfront was discussed and there is a desire to support the tall ships in the
district, and support for the idea of bike rentals along the waterfront, as well as a place to
display large fresh fish catches. Participants were not supportive of new buildings being
developed on the east side of M-22.
There is a desire to build a walk along the south breakwater (or other ways to access the
water), improve the water’s edge in the marina, and maintain a more low key character in the
marina site improvements. For example, the community would prefer to avoid industrial
looking steel railings along the water and use a simple design, perhaps of wood. The
waterfront edge should integrate better treatment of stormwater and have improved lighting,
though the lighting may be low level bollards as opposed to decorative street lights.

The site investigations, goals and objectives, and community preferences and ideas combined to give shape
the planning and design efforts that are described in the following sections of this report.

ALTERNATIVES CONSIDERED
To address the issues identified in earlier parts of the study, and incorporate the program elements the
community would like to have in their waterfront, the planning team prepared three alternative concept plans
for the entire district (Figures 10, 11, and 12), and three alternative concept plans for the Township marina
site (Figures 13, 14, and 15). While there is some compatibility between a particular district plan with a
specific marina plan, the plans for district scale could be matched with any of the plans from the marina scale.
Waterfront District
At the district scale, each plan reflects the basic framework of the corridor (refer to Figure 16) and considers
variations on the following:
1. Improving the M-22 Right-of-Way to insure traffic flow while improving non-motorized access and
use.
2. Encouraging redevelopment of key parcels over the long term, with a deliberate focus on using the
placement, shape, and character of buildings to create a walkable village atmosphere.
3. Developing parking strategies for shared parking to handle marina and boat launch overflow.
4. Realigning local roads and access to the marina site, in concert with improving pedestrian crossing of
M-22.
5. Improving connectivity in the district, across the highway, and to the TART trail for pedestrians and
bicyclists. Create loops off of non-motorized trails and greenways for interpretive and educational
opportunities.
Page 5 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

6. Encouraging stewardship of environmental assets.
7. Rearranging the street grid and highway design to reduce the number of curb cuts and improve
access management along M-22.
Alternative A: Leaves the existing road network largely intact and adds a new secondary street parallel to M22. The front door of new development could then be on the internal road network, with a high image
façade remaining along M-22. The secondary street would allow for circulation within the Waterfront
District with less dependence on M-22, reducing the conflicts associated with local traffic movements within
the district. This secondary street could link to the Discovery Center Great Lakes parcel, and could extend
further south before linking back to M-22.
Alternative B: Reroutes Grandview Drive into and through the Brewery Creek development property, such
that its intersection with M-22 is aligned with the entry into Greilickville Park. The focus of new
development would be on the area immediately north and south of Brewery Creek, and links new
development to the Discovery Center Great Lakes parcel.
Alternative C: Also reroutes Grandview Drive, but aligns it to the north of Brewery Creek for a stronger
link to the Township marina site. This alternative illustrates development more closely tied to M-22, with
fewer internal drives that parallel the highways function.
The Brewery Creek development site provides some opportunities for temporary uses of the site that could
benefit the Township and existing corridor businesses while long term redevelopment plans are prepared for
improved real estate market conditions. Temporary uses supported by the community include shared parking
to support the Township marina and boat launch, and a multi-purpose area for Township activities such as
artisan markets or winter festivals.
Township Marina Site
A companion set of alternatives was prepared to address specific improvements to the Township marina site.
While any of the marina site alternatives could be matched up with any of the district wide alternatives, there
is clear compatibility between the alternatives from each scale; for example, the district wide Alternative A
lines up key intersections of M-22 and side roads with the proposed marina site entry on the marina site
Alternative A. At this level of planning the marina site alternatives broadly illustrate different locations and
configurations of site entries, internal roads and parking spaces, building locations and boat launch lanes.
Each of the marina alternatives include a primary marina facilities building, a fish cleaning station, linkages to
a fishing pier along the existing breakwater, protection and enhancement of the Brewery Creek corridor, and
dock for day visitors. Distinctions between the alternatives can be described as follows:
Alternative A: Enters the site at the existing location of the intersection of M-22 and Grandview Drive.
Boats and trailers then move to the north toward a relocated set of boat launce lanes. The primary marina
facilities building is located at the center of the site near the northernmost dock, and a separate fish cleaning
station is located closer to the ramp.

Page 6 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

Alternative B: Connects the marina site to Graelickville Park based on the idea of rerouting Grandview
Drive through the Brewery Creek site and installing a signal at the improved intersection. The boat launch
would remain in its existing location, and a new marina building would be located at the south eastern corner
of the marina site.
Alternative C: creates a new entry location to line up with a new Grandview Drive street alignment that
parallels Brewery Creek, just immediately to its north. This entry road location allows for the separation of
slip renter parking from trailer parking, and also locates the marina building at the southeast corner of the
site.
The Waterfront District and Township Marina site alternatives were presented in a public forum, as well as in
focus group meetings, and reviews with the Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT). The input
gathered from these meetings directly influenced the further development of the plans. Two versions of a
final plan (Figures 17 and 18) were prepared for review with the Township Marina Committee to solicit
further input during the final planning stages.

RECOMMENDED PLAN
As with most design processes, the plan that results from a review of the alternatives presented includes a
combination of ideas from each. The recommended plan is a result of planning and design refinement and
responds to public input and discussion.
The purpose of the recommended plan is to set a direction for the development of the Waterfront District
corridor, and to identify key improvements to the township marina site. The Implementation section of this
report outlines critical next steps to move toward construction of the recommendations, and further
refinements to the plans are anticipated as additional technical review and input is received.
District Improvements Framework Plan
The primary goal of the District Improvements Framework Plan (Figure 19) is to create a village character
along the M-22 Corridor, increase the ability for pedestrians and bicyclists to safely cross and travel along the
corridor, and to enhance the business environment for private development and non-profit organizations.
Specific initiatives proposed for the Waterfront District include the following:
1. M-22 Right-of-Way Improvements
• Engage MDOT in the study of traffic lane configuration and signalization of key
intersections.
• Install landscape enhancements to beautify the corridor while maintaining an “up-north”
character.
• Improving district wayfinding and signage.
• Implementing a corridor access management plan to reduce the number of curb cuts.

Page 7 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

•

Improve pedestrian walks along the corridor, and increase the number and safety of road
crossings.

2. Corridor Redevelopment
• Develop private-public partnerships with key stakeholders.
• Identify strategies and leverage policies in support of corridor reinvestment.
• Concentrate redevelopment efforts around a central core.
• Modify the local road network to support redevelopment, including the realignment of
Grandview Drive through the Brewery Creek development property.
• Design new architecture and street improvements with a focus on creating a walkable
waterfront village.
3. District Parking Strategies
• Develop shared parking resources; consider purchase and use of Brewery Creek
development site for parking opportunities to support district and marina.
• Utilize peak season shuttle service to support marina, non-profit centers and businesses.
• Locate parking to the rear of future site developments.
4. District Connectivity
• Enhance non-motorized infrastructure (i.e.; the TART Trail, stream corridors, and other
open spaces) to create a trail and recreation network.
• Increase public access to the bay with a passive recreation trail on the east side of M-22.
• Provide future links to the future fishing pier and onto the Traverse City Light and Power
property.
• Improve pedestrian crossings within the district, for crossings of M-22 as well as where the
TART Trail crosses local roads.
5. Environmental and Cultural Assets
• Embrace the natural resources of the district to create an authentic “up-north” experience.
• Restore and enhance the Brewery Creek stream corridor from the TART Trail to the bay.
• Utilize and interpret the district’s natural resources as education opportunities.
• Respect the history of the area, integrating the story of human use of the area into the
recreational and interpretive resources.
Marina Master Plan
The Marina Master Plan (Figure 20) balances the needs to three primary user groups- the boating community
that rents slips and moorings, the boaters that utilize the boat launch ramps, and the general public (residents
and visitors) that will utilize the marina site and adjacent park as a destination and activity area. The
competing demands of these user groups, particularly as it relates to the needs for parking, must be evaluated
Page 8 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

and assessed carefully given the limitations of the size of the marina site and the difficulty in accessing M-22,
and the desire to create a welcoming, park-like environment.
In 2010 the Elmwood Township Marina Committee made specific recommendations to the Elmwood
Township Board as to improvements for the Township marina. These recommendations have been
incorporated into the Marina Master Plan, and can be found in the program outlined below in italics.
Specific design elements of the plan include:
1. Circulation and Parking
• Relocate the existing site entries for boat ramp users to align with the existing Pico Lane
which maximizes the length of the de-acceleration/turn lane on M-22.
• Widen and improve the site exit and slip renter entry at the south end of the site. Consider
staggering a future traffic light at the Greilickville Park entry to facilitate exiting the marina
site. The location and configuration of both marina site entries and the exit are subject to
refinement based on the recommended study of traffic along M-22.
• Provide for access to Center Point parking facilities from the new boat ramp entrance.
• Install a new parking lot for slip renters and guests. Manage use of the lot with access
control measures such as an entry/exit gate.
• Reconfigure boat trailer parking to allow, building capacity in the design geometrics for truck
and trailer traffic around site.
• Provide for overflow marina visitor and fish cleaning station parking within the larger boat
and trailer parking lot.
2. Public Access
• Create a new fishing pier and public promenade along the existing breakwater south of the
marina docks. Manage fishing access to the south side of pier only to reduce conflicts
between boaters renting slips and fishing activity.
• Insure a strong pedestrian connection between the marina and Greilickville Park with links
to the new breakwater promenade and the waterfront promenade near the docks
• Renovate the pedestrian promenade along marina to include more space for walkers, better lighting
and more pedestrian amenities like benches and picnic tables.
• Create a pedestrian link through the parking area and boat ramp to connect to the fish
cleaning station
• Install sidewalks and non-motorized paths on M-22 to link the marina to the larger district.
• Provide for public restrooms in the proposed marina building, separate from boater
facilities.
3. Harbor Facilities
• Provide a floating, hinged and movable dinghy launch ramp and shopper’s dock north of the boat ramp.

Page 9 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

•

•
•

Create a new Harbor Master’s Office on the north side of the ramp to improve the Harbor
Master’s ability to manage ramp traffic. Provide for materials storage and public restrooms
in the design of the Harbor Master’s office.
Locate a new fish cleaning station at the north end of the boat trailer parking area so that it is reasonably
close to the launch ramp activity, but separate enough to minimize traffic congestion.
Provide space (and flexibility in shopper’s dock design) for seasonal haul in and out of boats along the sheet
pile wall north of the boat launch.

4. Boater Facilities
• Construct a new marina building in the south east corner of the site. The new building should include
showers and bath facilities for boaters, a boater’s lounge, a multi-purpose community room,
a second floor overlooking the bay, a small multi-purpose office, and public bathrooms as
noted above.
• Provide for picnic opportunities in a variety of settings-in the plaza area outside the marina
building, along the pedestrian waterfront promenade, and in the open space areas adjacent to
Brewery Creek.
• Provide space for a dog run to allow boater’s a convenient place to water their pets.
• Increase capacity of mooring locations east of the boat channel with star configurations.
5. Other site improvements
• Enhance the Brewery Creek corridor improvements to improve habitat value.
• Install the necessary site signage, site furnishings, and amenities to help people enjoy the
marina
• Install bike parking hoops for use by boaters and marina visitors
• Provide space for a site dumpster area to manage site trash and recycling.

IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY
For a master plan of any kind to provide a benefit to the community it must have a dedicated group of
community members willing to invest the time, energy, and expertise necessary to move it from a pretty piece
of paper to reality. Our experience in preparing this plan has demonstrated that residents, business people,
Township staff and elected officials of Elmwood Township are ready to accept this challenge.
The pages below outline a strategy for implementing the Waterfront District Plan, including the big ideas that
will move the project forward, potential sources of funding, and specific short term steps that need to be
taken in the coming months.

Page 10 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

Key Ideas for Moving Forward
1. Motivate, Organize, and Strategize: The process of preparing a Master Plan is a great way to gather
community residents and stakeholders behind a single idea or project. More difficult is maintaining
this level of enthusiasm and interest after the plan is adopted. A couple of key ideas include:
• Nurture supporters and advocates within Elmwood, building from the existing Marina
Committee, dividing into task-based subcommittees that engage additional people.
• Identify champions and leaders within the Marina Committee and Township to take
ownership of key tasks and efforts.
• Get agencies to understand your plans and adopt it as part of their own strategy; for
instance, get the agencies involved in the TART Trail to understand your interest in creating
new connections.
2. Create Excitement: Promote the Master Plan and gain local support from community groups,
agencies, and organizations that have complementary goals.
• Reach Out – Obtain regional buy-in from groups serving the region where the ideas from
the Master Plan tie into larger efforts.
• Sponsor a Local Projects Coordination Workshop to investigate how your project relates to
other ongoing efforts in the area. Too often communities and organizations are pursuing
the same or very similar goals through parallel efforts.
• Develop Partnerships to “lock in” community, agency, and business support.
• Create a “Media Blitz” and aggressively market the plan to create “buzz” about the plan.
3. Study: Most Master Plans, because of their more conceptual level of thinking, result in the need for
additional technical studies to firm up key details and loose ends. The Waterfront District Master
Plan is no different, and several follow-up efforts have been identified and are enumerated later on in
this chapter.
4. Focus and Stick to Your Plan! The Waterfront District Master Plan identifies improvements both
for the larger community along M-22 and the Township marina site itself. This creates a broad set of
goals to pursue, and the situation will require some discipline to maintain sufficient focus to be
successful. As part of the effort to maintain focus, it may be important to identify a key project or
projects which can pursued by the community as a catalytic project to demonstrate that the
community is moving forward toward achieving its larger goals. Whether or not a specific catalyst
project is pursued, it will be important for the community to pick its priorities carefully with the
awareness that attempting to accomplish too much all at once can be detrimental to maintaining
focus and energy.
5. Find the Money, Set Timeframes: Funding sources do exist for the type of projects outlined in the
Waterfront District Master Plan, but pursuing funding takes significant effort and knowledge.

Page 11 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

Specific steps include:
•
•
•
•

•

Find a funding champion within your community who can become the lead person in
obtaining the knowledge and contacts required to mount a successful campaign.
Gain and understand public funding opportunities and timing. The information contained
in this report is a starting point.
Pursue private/non-profit funding commitments for design and implementation, even those
these sources of funding may not seem like an obvious place to start.
Provide Individual Giving/Donor Program for each project that moves into implementation
stage. Opportunities to contribute should be identified at a full range of financial
commitment levels, allowing every willing person in the community can be a part of the built
project.
Set an overall implementation timeline based on community priorities and funding and
match availability.

Potential Funding Sources
The successful pursuit of project funding is both art and science, and starts with the identification of potential
funding sources. The positive aspect of a project that has such broad range of long term goals is that the
potential pool of sources is large. The downside is that each funding source has its own set of goals,
requirements, timing, match expectations, and project size to learn and work with.
The potential funding sources have several common goals they are trying to achieve as they invest in
communities, and these goals are consistent with the attributes of the Waterfront District Master Plan,
including:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Creating and improving public access to the Great Lakes.
Creating and improving wildlife habitats and restoring native landscapes.
Providing for education and learning opportunities about our natural environment and
cultural history.
Building and strengthening partnerships between governmental agencies, non-profit
organizations, institutions, and private entities.
Enhancing community character, safety, and livability through the improvement of public
road and streetscape infrastructure.
Providing for non-motorized facilities such as bike lanes and paths whose use will improve
the health and well being of community members.

Potential funding sources for implementing the Waterfront District Master Plan include:
1. Federal and State Sources
• Coastal Zone Management Grants and Waterways Program Grants; these are funding
programs managed by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment
(MDNRE). They typically require a 50% match, and are normally in the range of $10,000Page 12 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

$30,000. Though small in size, the grants can be very helpful in funding design and
engineering studies in the design phase.
•

Great Lake Fisheries Trust is a non-profit organization governed by the parties to a
settlement resulting from impacts to Great Lakes fisheries through the operation of the
Ludington Pumped Storage Project. The Trust manages the assets generated by the
settlement. The Great Lakes Fishery Trust will provide grant funds to non-profit
organizations and government entities for the following purposes:
 Research projects that benefit Great Lakes fishery resources,
 Rehabilitation of lake trout, lake sturgeon and other Great Lakes fish species,
 Protection and enhancement of Great Lakes fisheries habitat,
 Public education about the Great Lakes fishery, and
 Property acquisition for the above purposes or to provide access to the Great Lakes.

Although a match is not required, it does show support and local commitment to the project.
•

The National Fish and Wildlife Foundation (NFWF) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit that preserves and
restores our nation’s native wildlife species and habitats. Created by Congress in 1984, NFWF
directs public conservation dollars to the most pressing environmental needs and matches those
investments with private funds. The Foundation’s method is simple and effective: work with a
full complement of individuals, foundations, government agencies, non-profits, and corporations
to identify and fund the nation’s most intractable conservation challenges.

•

Boating Infrastructure Grant (BIG); a federal program administered by the U.S. Department of
the Interior and the MDNRE, which focuses on building projects that increase boating and
water access. Though little used by Michigan communities, this source of funding may be a
good fit for the Township marina.

•

Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund (MNRTF); is a reasonably broad state run program that
funds land acquisition and project construction, and could be tapped into relative to creating and
restoring natural habitat, as well as providing recreational resources such as the path.

•

Transportation Enhancement Grants; this program is federally funded and managed by the
Michigan Department of Transportation (MDOT). The program typically funds transportation
projects that fit outside the construction of road, such as streetscape improvements and multiuse paths. A local match of 20% is required; however, most successful grantees offer a local
match of 40% to 50%.

•

Land and Water Conservation Fund; a program ran by the National Parks Service which
supports projects that focus on preserving and enhancing riparian, floodplains, and wetland
habitats.
Page 13 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

•

Michigan Economic Development Corporation (MEDC): This organization can be an effective
partner in developing a strategic plan for the district and assisting in site development and
funding.

•

U.S. Senator Carl Levin and U.S. Senator Debbie Stabenow: While not a specific program or
source of funding, the U.S. Senators can be helpful in identifying funding sources and advocating
for important projects.

2. Local Organizations
• Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation
• Rotary Charities
• Traverse City Light and Power
• Kiwanis, Lions Clubs
• Grand Traverse Area Sport Fishing Association
3. Foundations
• W. K. Kellogg Foundation
• Kresge Foundation
• Oleson Foundation
• Mott Foundation
• Other private funders and foundations
• Private corporation grants
Specific Next Steps
In the immediate term, the Waterfront District Master Plan recommends that Elmwood Township and the
Marina Committee complete the following steps:
1. Approve the Master Plan for both the overall M-22 corridor district and the Township marina
site.
2. Update the Township Recreation Plan as required supporting the goals of the Waterfront
District Master Plan.
3. Meet with the appropriate state, county and regional agencies, including MDOT, Leelanau
County Road Commission, MDNR, and TART.
4. Engage regional and local community initiatives, such as the Grand Vision, to educate them as to
the project and to look for common points of interest and potential collaborations.
5. Traffic Study on M-22 Corridor to determine feasibility and the best location(s) for new traffic
signals, pedestrian crossings, access management opportunities, realignment potential for
Page 14 of 18

�WATERFRONT DISTRICT MASTER PLAN
Elmwood Township, Michigan
January 25, 2012

Grandview Drive, and the impacts these ideas may have on the proposed ingress and egress
plans for the marina site.
6. Find partners for funding the Traffic Study noted above; for instance, LCRC, MDOT, and
Grand Vision.
7. Inventory natural features in the corridor district, including wetlands and woodlands, to assist the
Township in the consideration of relocating Grandview Drive and related site improvements
suggested by the Waterfront District Master Plan.
8. Pursue and obtain ownership of land, and/or partnership agreements with land owners, to
provide for increasing off-site parking for visitors, users of the boat launch, and marina patrons.
9. Restart Greilickville Commercial Corridor Task Force, and make the approval of the Waterfront
District Master Plan a priority for the group. In conjunction with the Task Force, pursue
funding for, and implementation of, improvements to the public right-of-way for M-22 including
non-motorized trails and sidewalks, lighting, landscaping, and related streetscape and roadway
improvements.
10. Consider zoning and community master plan amendments to facilitate the implementation of the
Waterfront District Master Plan. This effort should include input from the Greilickville
Commercial Corridor Task Force, and could be charged with confirming a set of planning goals
and objectives for district development, preparing a set of design guidelines for public
infrastructure and private development, introducing amendments to the zoning code and map
that specifically address the goals and objectives for the area, and considering the potential for a
form based zoning code for the waterfront district.
11. Identify and pursue the first phase of marina improvements, such as the Public Promenade along
breakwater (with connections to the marina and park), shopper’s dock, picnic areas, and fish
cleaning station (refer to Figure 21). Some of these first phase projects may require temporary
changes to the existing site configuration to insure that the improvements work in the short and
long term.

Page 15 of 18

�Waterfront District Master Plan
FIGURES

�•
r

L

'

CEDAR LAKE

I

r
r
r

~

•

0

.

•

•

•

•

Cl

0

"

0

I

I

0

!

E. CHERRY BEND ROAD/ CO. RD. 633

•

•

"

rf'

ii

0

TRA

0

•

IL

"

'

0

(ll

ll
~
0

"'

•

0

•

•

•
0

•
t

0

•

0

--

.

0

........______

-a

"'

0

...

•

•

0

AU

._

0

c,
0

b

r

---

E. PCIO DRIVE

ti

Q

S. BRIAR DRIVE

•

0.

0

LAN

0

•

•

LEE

Q

S. SUNSET DRIVE

0

0

0

0

($

0

•

b

ti

a,

•

or

0

"

..... ,.

-,

G R A N'.,D.V.I.E...W. - .Di JlR;lliIlii.V.illE

ELMWOOD TOWNSHIP
MARINA

0

BREWERY
CREEK PROPERTY

8
\
\

G R E I L I C K V I L L E PA R K

LEELA
RAIL
NAU T

T . C . L . P.

DISCOVERY CENTER
G R E AT L A K E S

0

l

LEGEND

L

)

LAND USE

TALL SHIPS

FOREST
OPEN FIELD
COMMERCIAL

M A R AT H O N

INDUSTRIAL
0

RESIDENTIAL

•

RECREATIONAL
CORRIDOR

oy

OPPORTUNITIES

I

CARTER ROAD

I

G . T. YA C H T C L U B
A PAC H E T R O U T G R I L L E

0

N

••
••

0’		200’		400’		800’

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

ELMWOOD TOWNSHIP

M

i

c

h

i

FIGURE 1

g

a

n

WAT E R F R O N T D I S T R I C T P L A N
Public Workshop II - Oc tober 27, 2011

L~ A' N~ D1D U S E
~

' .

'''
'~'
'; ' ' '
I/\\

I

•••

'

&lt;.j

,,_/

'

�1
I

2

CEDAR LAKE

1
E. CHERRY BEND ROAD/ CO. RD. 633

LEE

3

LAN
AU
E. PCIO DRIVE

S. BRIAR DRIVE

IL

S. SUNSET DRIVE

TRA

4

2

ELMWOOD TOWNSHIP
MARINA

3
GRANDVIEW DRIVE

B R E W E RI Y
CREEK PROPERTY
•

l.tr

4

'I

'

5

G R E I L I C K V I L L E PA R K

LEELA

5

RAIL
NAU T

DISCOVERY CENTER
G R E AT L A K E S

T . C . L . P.

6

6

LEGEND
7

TALL SHIPS

t

EXISTING CURB CUT

0

I

I

'

I

I

'

.•-.
. _.
. -.
. _.

CURB CUT TO BE REMOVED

'

EXISTING INTERSECTION

I

I

'

INTERSECTION TO BE MODIFIED

I

I

M A R AT H O N

7

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN X-ING

f

PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN X-ING
RIGHT OF WAY (WIDTH FT.)
120’
100’
75’
66’

CARTER ROAD

8

G . T. YA C H T C L U B

'

8

TRANSITIONAL 100 ‘ - 75’

A PAC H E T R O U T G R I L L E

0’		200’		400’		800’

N

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

ELMWOOD TOWNSHIP

M

i

c

h

FIGURE 2

i

g

a

n

WAT E R F R O N T D I S T R I C T P L A N
Public Workshop II - Oc tober 27, 2011

A C. C E S S M A Ni\~ A GI\ Ef, M E Ntr T +
~~
Rrn! O W I~ M P~) Rrn) O V E~ M E N~\~ TJ S
~

i i\ \

.

'

, ,,·'

,' 11'

-

' ' ''
''

1.

'

-,

'

,- _}

,,, , I

,~

'

/I\
, I\ I

I /' \ / ,1

,_, '

'

•,

.,_

-''

I ' I 'I

~

,-\1/

'''
' I ' I' I
\ 11 I' VI
I, 11

/

I_ _/ I~/

I \~/

I I .'' . ' '\
' '
'Ll

'

/ :.J \

! '

LJ \ .·'

cJ

'

/~-

-''

I

,I

-,

'

I ,, ,, I
/' 1/ 11

J

\'

' '''

I i\\/j I

,,

,

..

' '
'.

I/\ I

.

\ '1

I \~/ I I

\, 1----;
\\I

1

I \I/

\ii

'~

•,

,. '(

I I '\i' I

1 /\ ,: 1\ I
-

L-::J

"

-

-=i
::J

-=i

_,
'

'

�'

,,_

I

I I

I

'

'

LEGEND
-

50 FT BUFFER

Ill VEGETATED
TARTTRAIL
WETLANDS
-

FRESHWATER EMERGENT WETLAND

-

.FRESlrlWATER FORESTED/ SHRi:JB WETLANp

D

FRESHWATER POND

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

NAfURAt FEATURES

FIGURE 3

�.,
'
.~
-U:1J&gt;!':!Y::0(D
-~i-...c--~

f

---

.--·-~,_... .;.1

-~~

•

~

..d..l

-

•
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . .
RO N r

.

.

. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . .

II

oI s r R I cr r L

!LMwooo row.Ns.H,~

wAT EHf

FIGURE 4

Public Workshop• October 1, 2011

. ..

�............................................................
PUBLIC
ELMWOOD IOWtlSH I P WATER F RO NT DISTRICT PL A N
..,. WAr'ERFR _OtfTS
•FIGURE
, , .5 , • · . Public Workshop • October 1, 2011
JJR
•

�••

DI s TR I ( T p LAN
October I, 2011
JJR

!lMWOO? TOW.HS.HI'.

wATER FRONT

FIGURE 6

Public Workshop -

,l',i;·I,~

~

D
ARIMA
,. AM~NlTTES

&amp;

�~ ACTlR &amp;

FIGURE 7

IDEN'fTTY

�I •

............. ........................................... . . . . . ....
'

:Li!w?o~ r,ow,Ns_HI~

WATERFRONT DISTRICT Pl AN

FIGURE 8

Public Workshop • October 1, 2011

JJR

COltfi.t TIVITY &amp;

-·

--

ACC£S~

�•

!L~w~o~ row.»s.tti~

WAT ERF RO NT D IS TR IC T P LA

FIGURE 9

Pub Ii c Workshop - 0 ct ob er 1. 2 0 1 1

JJ

I

1.D DWAYS &amp;
CI-flCl!_ l ATll) N

�CEDAR LAKE

'''
''
''
''
'

,,'

_,/

.....

_,,.. ~
_,/

~

:__ -- -------- ------ ----- --/

E. CHERR Y BEND ROAD / CO . RD . 633:'
''

\

~
&lt;Ii

~

&gt;

~

'

LU ;··-------•'

&gt;

a:

'
&gt; ·-------------------

a:

C,

C,

&gt;--

a:

~

V,

«:

:z:
=:,

a:

V,

""

V,

V,

'-'
Q,.

,

·--------------------- --

00

BREW ~ Y
CREEK P /O PERT Y

SHI P
A

'

''
''

'

''

'

''

''
'

''

\
''
'\
'\

GREILI CKVILLE
PARK

\

'

\

\

------------

T.C. L. P.
------

IT I M E
I if.1\"G
ALLIArh,

,,0·

'

'

''
''
'

''
''•·--- - -- - ---- - -

i ,,,,,,,,, _____ ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, _____

\,.

_.- -------- -,,

I . p-

,

''' - - - - - - - , '''
''

LEGEND
CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK

TALL SHIP S

D
D

'
'''
''
,''
''
'•'
•'
''
'' '
••
','

'
''

''

,
,'

,
,, '

0
.

G.T. YACHT CLUB

DISTRICT GATEWAY
WALKING RADII (5MIN. INTERVAL)

■
■
.

·-----------·

CARTER ROAD

DEVELOPMENTOPPORTUNITY
RIPARIAN CORRIDOR

--------.

MARATHON

PARKING

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN X-ING
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN X-ING
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL CONNECTION
EXISTING WATERWAY + BUFFER

APA CHE TROUT GRILLE

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

CONCEPT
FIGURE 10

A

�CEDAR LAKE

______ __
..-- .---- ------ -------,

(_

''
''
''
''
''
''
''

''
''
''

''
''
''

''

''

''
''
',
'',
,

,,

_,/

.....

_,,,, ~
~

_,/

:__ --------- - ------ ----- --/

E, CHERR Y BEND ROAD / CO , RD , 633
.-;a

\.1i
\

~
'11

~

~

&gt;

&gt;

er:

er:

c:,

c:,

I-

er:

0

~

&lt;

u

V&gt;

er:

:z

"-

=&gt;
V&gt;

I~

V&gt;

'

-

l,l'J
~- y

GRANDVIEW DRIVE

•,;;;

- '1·,@ ;ilJ
•l-:,.1

11

~

'I'

•i.n

df

c-,,

fl~~ 'll ', '-

1

-

JJ

,.; If,

'

-

w·oo

"
,

NSHIP
IN A

''

''
''

'

''
''
'

''
'

''

'

''
''

\

'

\

------- -''
--------'""
"'''

11 !I
~

''
'\
'\

i

I!
ff
t·

GREILI CKVILLE
PARK

\

'

\

\

--- ---------- -

T.C. L. P.
----------- -,,

'''
''
'

IT I M E
I if.1\"llALL I A}c,

''
''•·--- - -- - ---- - -

;

-------------------------- ------

'\

:'

''

''
''
''
''

'

'

'
; ----- --- ----------------------- - ----]'
''
''
''
''----------------- -------------- .--- .

LEGEND

'''
'

CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK

TALL SHIP S
.' ---- ------------.

'''
,,,'
'

D
D

'
'''
'
:-'''
••
'
'
''
''
'''
''
''
•''
•
''
'' '
••
'•'

'
•'
'
••
·-----------·•

CARTER ROAD

DEVELOPMENTOPPORTUNITY
RIPARIAN CORRIDOR

--------.

MARATHON

PARKING

0

WALKING RADII (5MIN. INTERVAL)

■
■
.

.

G.T. YACHT CLUB

DISTRICT GATEWAY

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN X-ING
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN X-ING
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL CONNECTION
EXISTING WATERWAY + BUFFER

APACHE TROUT GRILLE

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

CONCEPT
FIGURE 11

B

�CEDAR LAKE

'''
''
''
''

,,''

_,/

.....

_,,.. ~
_,/

~

:__ --------- - ------ ----- --/

E. CHER RY BEN D RO AD / CO . RD. 6 3 3 : ........ ,
'

\

'

'

~

&gt;

~

&gt;

cc:

~
&lt;ii

~

&gt;

cc:

C,

,_

C,

~

cc:

cc:
C

«:

V&gt;

z:

;·--------

0

'
·---------

,,,,
~

cc:
cc

=&gt;
V&gt;

~

V&gt;

GRAND l! IEW DRIVE

p

'

''
''

'

''

'

''

''
'

''

',,
'

''
''
'

''
'

H R"l"T"A"llALL I AN C~

LEGEND

p

CORRIDOR DEVELOPMENT BLOCK

TALL SHIP S

D
D

MARATHON

'

'
''
'
''

:-''
'
''
''
'
''
''
:
:'
'

0

DISTRICTGATEWAY
WALKING RADII (5MIN. INTERVAL)

'
''
''
·-----------·''

■

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN X-ING

■

PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN X-ING

..

CARTER ROAD

DEVELOPMENTOPPORTUNITY
RIPARIAN CORRIDOR

--------- ----- ---.

'
'''
'
'''
'
''

PARKING

.

G.T. YACHT CLUB

EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL CONNECTION
EXISTING WATERWAY + BUFFER

APACHE TROUT GRILLE

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

CONCEPT
FIGURE 12

�---- -----

r -I

II
__::
~

....,,

~

I

I

-~~-1
e
,
.
,
'
/I
/-

', ,

1

•

I i I /

I

00 ,/
'I

I

I

' I

1

'(_?7" (@

I

\

~ ~:::;:~~~2{#:e,..1

I
I
I

f

\'

I

,t

~1

=J

$i

I

!&lt;

f

~ \ ~(!J
~!
.
,~

\ i

'/:I

I

\

+

i

~

ii

Ji
I
i;,,-

I~
"1

'

J ("\

l_, 11
-!
~

~ li

!

i~
~

1

j~

f
li
'it

1~

~ B-

~~

t

()

9

"-

~

~i

'.2~ ~t
__,

L

I
I

\

I

I
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

BASE MAP

FIGURE 13

�--

··1'"-·;i

,,_!_

n~ ·t

~~ T~ 1I~
:

:1~:

- .

,~!~

~ I

I I /:

I

I

I

I

I

oo
I
-::qi
I

I,

I!

00 ,
7

/
'

'. ~ '\.'

. . j,_.

;,,,,'~\,~~

---

"\1---·~

~

.

...:----

~ ·i

i

·!1

/;

' . -i-+--

1~

(I\

h: ~1
j ' '"

~!1
·
1
+!
~

,j

l
I
\ I

- 41 I
I
I

I
•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

BASE MAP

FIGURE 14

�--

.

'

.

J1 'J

jt

j ;~
')!

"it

1~.i. . ..-~
. . ... ' . 6.

t

.

-

I
•

I

I

I

i

I

~

J

.

-

~'SI

-~
~i
·-

.

·-

'

.

'

ji i~
i

_,

,a

...
--"

!

-

-;t ~

lj

~l
1.,

.

1

--i-lil

_... I

-

r

'l '
11,

:

'

.''

!c.1.
~~1

.I

I

I .:j

I

'

'

l

r

'

~\ If!]

~

·'i"'·

-

, I

'

~-

~
.

I

•.

i"lt-"""

-- ,..-.
,

~9

~

i

9.

i

., .

I
~-

••

.
\

-

I

II
\

j
•

-

"

;\' \
I

I

!).

:~

\

58"·

'
$

G'

I

'

l

~

\

I I

..,,
~l-'
a ~

,)

\

'

~

•

1
~

~

,_;,
'

'"

'r
Ill

~

l

•

I
I

••

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

BASE MAP

FIGURE 15

�CEDAR LAKE

E. CHERRY BEND ROAD/ CO. RD. 633

LEE
LAN
E. PCIO DRIVE

IL

S. BRIAR DRIVE

TRA

S. SUNSET DRIVE

AU
ELMWOOD TOWNSHIP
M A R I N\ A

GRANDVIEW DRIVE

BREWERY
CREEK PROPERTY
,,

...... -----------------------

''
''

'
,•'

G R E I L I C K V I L L E PA R K

LEELA

T . C . L . P.

RAIL
NAU T

DISCOVERY CENTER
G R E AT L A K E S

,,,. ..

.------

...... ,,..,,.

__ ,

,,

------

,,

- -- ___ ,. , , - - - - - - - - -,,_,,.__________J

LEGEND

D

TALL SHIPS

DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY
DEVELOPMENT RESTRICTIONS
EXISTING RECREATIONAL
LAND USE

0

M A R AT H O N

DISTRICT GATEWAY
75’ RIGHT OF WAY
WALKING RADII (5MIN. INTERVAL)

-- ---------------

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN X-ING
-,
,,•
•

PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN X-ING

.

CARTER ROAD

F U LTO N PA R K

EXISTING TRAIL

.

G . T. YA C H T C L U B

PROPOSED TRAIL CONNECTION
EXISTING WATERWAY + BUFFER

A PAC H E T R O U T G R I L L E

N

0’		200’		400’		800’

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

ELMWOOD TOWNSHIP

WAT E R F R O N T D I S T R I C T P L A N

FIGURE 16

Public Workshop II - Oc tober 27, 2011

M

i

c

h

i

g

a

n

FRAMEWORK PLAN
''1\"' \

I I I\/ I

' \_I
'~'

\, 1 1 I I

I I'\

i

L_I

\ \/ I//
I 11 I\ 11 I

,_j '~'

;

'

'"
'!_.I
'
'~'
\_J
'I, I

I I\\

�_ . . - - - - - - - - - - - - NEW WALK CONNECTION TO
PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS

RECONFIGURED M-22
ROAD SECTION
(DESIGN TO BE DETERMINED)

- - - - - - - - - - RELOCATED ACCESS INTO
CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES
DINGHY LAUNCH RAMP
SHOPPER ' S COURTESY DOCK (6 SLIPS)

~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - RAMP TO SHOPPER'S DOCK (UNIVERSALLY ACCESSIBLE - TYP . )
~

, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REMOVABLE FLOATING DOCK SECTIONS
(SEASONAL IN / OUT OF BOATS)

Jl

rc\ "'.;a.u;ii •- - - - - :.t¾- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - FISH

•
•

~~

.@
-

I

CLEANING/ MARINA STORAGE BUILDING

~---=-....,..__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ EXISTING BOAT RAM PS TO REMAIN
...t.~

. - - - - - - - NEW MARINA COMPLEX

I

•

- BOATERS FACILITIES
RESTROOMS /S HOWERS

- CONCESSIONS (PUBLIC)

LAUNDRY

- MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

LOUNGE / MAP ROOM

fc!c:;=--===_==,~ - - - --;:'-- - - -

- HARBOR MASTER / MARINA OFFICE

(SECOND FLOOR)

EX I ST I NG I NFRAST RUCT URE TO REM A I N

PASSENGER VEHICLE PARKING (72)

-

•

-®~

-

@

I

-

•

--

•

-

•

-- --

-

BOAT TRAILER PARKING (92)

I

t --=-~-=
- :;-::::~~S~=~~

1
~ ..._

PUB LI C PRO M ENA DE
-

SEATWALLS

- LANDSCAPING
- LIGHTING (SHIELDED)

_.

~

,{·
I
.

,1
_-)

....

D- [

FISHING PIER &amp; PUBLIC PROMENADE

I

,I

__...
re

-

It

\I

-

I

- 10-12 ' WIDE WALK WITH RAILINGS, BENCHES

"-----ACCESSIBLE CONNECTION TO
FISHING PIER
" - - - - - - BREWERY CREEK
RESTORATION AREA

I
-....__ _ _ _ _ _ NEW SIDEWALKS (6')
&amp; LANDSCAPE BUFFER
EACH SIDE OF M-22

PARKING
EXISTING CONDITIONS
- BOAT TRAILER--------------134 SPACES
- PASSENGER VEHICLE-------- 82 SPACES
PREFERRED PLAN - Pl
- BOAT TRAILER---------------92 SPACES (-42 SPACES)
- PASSENGER VEHICLE-------- 97 SPACES(+ 15 SPACES)
LEGEND

0

NUMBER OF PROPOSED SPACES

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

eRE~ERRED PLAN

FIGURE 17

Pl

�RECONFIGURED M-22 - ~
ROAD SECTION

_ . . - - - - - - - - - - - - NEW WALK CONNECTION TO
PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS

(DESIGN TO BE DETERMINED)

- - - - - - - - - - RELOCATED ACCESS INTO
CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES
DINGHY LAUNCH RAMP
I

SHOPPER'S COURTESY DOCK (6 SLIPS)

~

ll..,..__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

RAMP TO SHOPPER'S DOCK (UNIVERSALLY ACCESSIBLE - TYP.)

- - - - - - - - - - - - - REMOVABLE FLOATING DOCK SECTIONS
(SEASONAL IN/OUT OF BOATS)

--- ~

;;:::,L.C= - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

HA RBO R MAST ER/ MA RI NA OFFI CE
FISH CLEANING STATION
STORAGE (MARINA)

I

I -

,_...
(..,..a\r, - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EXISTING BOAT RAMPS TO REMAIN
•

1+ -=~ ~ ---:-- - -----;;-- - - - EXISTING

I

I

@® ®
1t
e

•

INFRASTRUCTURE TO REMAIN

PASSENGER VEHICLE PARKING (70)

32 ·

I

•

--

38

-

-

-

- - - - - - - N E W MARINA COMPLEX

I

-

- BOATERS FACILITIES

- HARBORMASTER/ MARINA OFFICE

RESTROOMS/SHOWERS

- CONCESSIONS (PUBLIC)

LAUNDRY

- MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

LOUNGE/MAP ROOM

(SECOND FLOOR)

+ - - - - - - - - - - - PUBLIC PROMENADE
- SEATWALLS
- LANDSCAPING
- LIGHTING (SHIELDED)

- - - FISHING PIER &amp; PUBLIC PROMENADE
- 10-12' WIDE WALK WITH RAILINGS, BENCHES

"-----ACCESSIBLE CONNECTION TO
FISHING PIER
" - - - - - - BREWERY CREEK
RESTORATION AREA

lI

I
-....__ _ _ _ _ _ NEW SIDEWALKS (6')
&amp; LANDSCAPE BUFFER
EACH SIDE OF M-22

PARKING
EXISTING CONDITIONS
- BOAT TRAILER--------------134 SPACES
- PASSENGER VEHICLE-------- 82 SPACES
PREFERRED PLAN - P2
- BOAT TRAILER---------------92 SPACES (-42 SPACES)
- PASSENGER VEHICLE-------- 94 SPACES (+12 SPACES)

LEGEND

0

NUMBER OF PROPOSED SPACES

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

eRE~ERRED PLAN

FIGURE 18

P2

�Adopted by the Charter Township of Elmwood Board

CEDAR LAKE

...............
~---.............. ,-............ ,~
,,~ . ,

''
''
''
'

'I

0P

CEDAR LAKE
B OAT L A U N C H

2

E. CHERRY BEND ROAD

LEE

''
'''
'
'''
·-----·'

LAN
AU
E. PCIO DRIVE

S. BRIAR DRIVE

IL

S. SUNSET DRIVE

TRA

P
·---------·

B

W
E
R

Y
R
E

1

0P

GRANDVIEW DRIVE

C

2

RE

''
'

□

5

'

,•···\ ···········

EK

6

''
''
'

BREWERY
'' C R E E K P R O P E R T Y
'

ELMWOOD
TOWNSHIP
MARINA

2

4

''

I
I

''

P

4

I

FUTURE
FISHING PIER

P

3

,,11
""

11
11

5

6

}-:

P

DISCOVERY CENTER
G R E AT L A K E S

CORRIDOR REDEVELOPMENT
• DEVELOP PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIPS WITH KEY STAKEHOLDERS
• IDENTIFY STRATEGIES AND LEVERAGE POLICIES IN SUPPORT OF 		
CORRIDOR REINVESTMENT
• CONCENTRATE REDEVELOPMENT EFFORTS AROUND A ‘CENTRAL CORE’
• MODIFY ROAD NETWORK TO SUPPORT REDEVELOPMENT - REALIGN
GRANDVIEW DRIVE THROUGH BREWERY CREEK PROPERTY
• DESIGN ARCHITECTURE AND STREETS FOR PEDESTRIAN AND 		
VEHICLES

J

"&lt;·.

"·c,_,._

T . C . L . P.

T . C . L . P.

----.•~-----':•.

·,\

i\_. ............ .

M.H.A

D

EXISTING DEVELOPMENT

P
[OJ

PARKING
RIPARIAN CORRIDOR

MASONS

0P
P

DISTRICT CONNECTIVITY

DEVELOPMENT BLOCK

4

P

• DEVELOP SHARED PARKING RESOURCES
• UTILIZE PEAK-SEASON SHUTTLE/JITNEY SERVICE
• LOCATE PARKING IN REAR OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

LEGEND

4

4

DISTRICT PARKING STRATEGIES

GREILICKVILLE
PA R K

CHILDREN’S
MUSEUM

L

4

3

TRAI

3

ENGAGE MDOT TO STUDY LANE RECONFIGURATION ALONG CORRIDOR
LANDSCAPE ENHANCEMENTS
DISTRICT WAYFINDING AND SIGNAGE
CORRIDOR ACCESS MANAGEMENT PLAN
PEDESTRIAN ACCESS (WALKS AND X-INGS)

......... •·"\'.

ANAU

2

•
•
•
•
•

6
[]

P

"\\ .·

LEEL

DISTRICT WIDE INITIATIVES
1 M-22 RIGHT-OF-WAY IMPROVEMENTS

,,
",,

DEVELOPMENT OPPORTUNITY
VEGETATED/ECOLOGICAL
IMPORTANCE

TALL SHIPS

2

DISTRICT GATEWAY

• ENHANCE UPON RECREATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE (TART TRAIL AND
EXISTING OPEN SPACES) TO CREATE A BRAIDED TRAIL NETWORK
• INCREASE PUBLIC ACCESS TO THE BAY WITH PASSIVE RECREATIONAL
TRAIL ALONG M-22 ROW (EAST SIDE)
• PROVIDE LINKS TO FUTURE FISHING PIER AND ONTO T.C.L.P. PROPERTY
• IMPROVE PEDESTRIAN CROSSINGS WITH IN DISTRICT (TART TRAIL,
M-22)

KIGHTS OF
COLUMBUS

M A R AT H O N

-.'

ENVIRONMENTAL

EXISTING ROAD
PROPOSED ROAD
WALKING RADII (5MIN.
INTERVAL)

''

I

I
I

• EMBRACE NATURAL RESOURCES OF DISTRICT TO CREATE AN 		
AUTHENTIC UP-NORTH DESTINATION
• RESTORE AND ENHANCE BREWERY CREEK FROM TART TRAIL TO BAY
• UTILIZE AND INTERPRET THE DISTRICT’S NATURAL RESOURCES AS
EDUCATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES

EXISTING PEDESTRIAN X-ING
PROPOSED PEDESTRIAN X-ING

1

ELMWOOD TOWNSHIP MARINA / GREILICKVILLE PARK
• REDEVELOP LANDSIDE OF MARINA TO ENHANCE BOATER EXPERIENCE
AND IMPROVE FACILITIES, PARKING AND PUBLIC ACCESS
• CREATE LINKS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES THAT PROMOTES PUBLIC
ACCESS AND PEDESTRIAN SAFETY		
• INSTALL FISHING PIER ALONG EXISTING ARMOR STONE REVETMENT

□

EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL

CARTER ROAD

F U LTO N PA R K

G . T. YA C H T C L U B

EXISTING WATERWAY AND
BUFFER

A PAC H E T R O U T G R I L L E

N

0’		200’		400’		800’

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

ELMWOOD TOWNSHIP

M

i

c

h

i

FIGURE 19

g

a

n

WAT E R F R O N T D I S T R I C T P L A N

District Improvements - November 22, 2011

FRAMEWORK PLAN
'' "'

I I'\
11 I

i

' \__I
'~'

L_I

I I I\/ I

\ \/ I//
I 11 ii 11 I
\, 1 1 I I

,_j '~'

;

'

' i"i \
''~''
!....' \_J
'I, I

I

�Adopted by the Charter Township of Elmwood Board

, , - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - NEW WALK CONNECTION TO
PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS

RECONFIGURED M-22
ROAD SECTION
(DESIGN TO BE DETERMINED)

. - - - - - - - - - RELOCATED ACCESS INTO
CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES

CONFIRM GRADES PRIOR
TO FINAL DESIGN

DINGHY LAUNCH RAMP

SPECIFIC ENTRANCE LOCATION
TO BE DETERMINED PENDING
RESULTS OF TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT STUDY

SHOPPER'S COURTESY DOCK (6 SLIPS)

PICO DRIVE
ffl'.llll'illll----------------

RAMP TO SHOPPER'S DOCK ! UNIVERSALLY ACCESSIBLE - TYP.)

,•

FISH CLEANING
STATION

~ = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REMOVABLE FLOATING DOCK SECTIONS
(SEASONAL IN/OUT OF BOATS)

SHORT TERM PARKING
FOR FISH CLEANING

~ :__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HARBOR MASTER/ MARINA OFFICE

~=r,,===

GRANDVIEW DRIVE

PUBLIC RESTROOMS (2)
STORAGE (MARINA)

' .

'

1-\:=--.. !E.:/4::::::::~

I

-

l

I

.'

EX I ST I NG BO AT RAM PS TO REMA I N

D-Q-E-K-\- C

~;;:::::::::~ ,--~ -~::-7 ---------t----:----;--____;._

..

I

BO_AT TRAILER
PARKING (79)

:___________:...____

EXI STI NG I NFRA STRUCTURE TO REMA I N

@ 31@
: , : , , 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' : ' - --:---.-

L

'♦ : ♦ :'"", _- 3

t

DOG RUN
PICNIC AREA

: - D-O~

81 CNIC ARE A

B

____--:::------------~t:::~=---=~--:-------;-----:-:-7

---

PUBL I C PROM ENA DE
- SEATWALLS

BIKE PARKING

- LANDSCAPING

.
. .

- LIGHTING (SHIELDED)

NEW MARINA COMPLEX

SPECIFIC ENTRANCE LOCATION
TO BE DETERMINED PENDING
RESULTS OF TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT STUDY

• I
' I

- KEYED BOATER'S FACILITIES

I

DUMPSTER CORRAL
ACCESS CONTROL

''

PICNIC AREA

\

RESTROOMS/SHOWERS

FLEX OFFICE SPACE

LAUNDRY

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

LOUNGE/MAP ROOM

(SECOND FLOOR)

- PUBLIC FA CILITIES

.

RESTROOMS

NEW SIDEWALKS (6')
&amp; LANDSCAPE BUFFER
EACH SIDE OF M-22

CONCESSIONS
I

' - - - FISHING PIER &amp; PUBLIC PROMENADE
-

- 10-12' WIDE WALK WITH RAILINGS, BENCHES

\

BREWERY CREEK DR IVEJ

" - - - ACCESSIBLE CONNECTION TO
FISHING PIER

.

'

I

' - - - - - - BREWERY CREEK
RESTORATION AREA
I

PARKING
EXISTING CONDITIONS
BOAT TRAILER
PASSENGER VEHICLE

134 SPACES
82
SPACES

PREFERRED PLAN

0
0

BOAT TRAILER
PASSENGER VEHICLE

79
90

SPACES
SPACES

( - 42

SPACES)
8 SPACES)

(+

LEGEND

©

OFF-SITE PARKING*

■

BOAT TRAILER
PASSENGER VEHICLE

1 2 0 SPACE
11 0 SPACES

-

( + 6 8 SPACES)
( + 122 SPACES)

ACCESS CONTROL
PICNIC AREA

■

DUMPSTER CORRAL

0

BIKE PARKING

E9

* REFER TO DISTRICT PLAN FOR POTENTIAL SHARED PARKING LOCATIONS.

NUMBER OF PROPOSED SPACES

N

200'

400'

800'

O'

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

ELMWOOD TOWNSHIP
Michigan

FIGURE 20

i
'
I

'

'

.

'

.

•·.

I

I

''

PREFERRED PLAN

..

I

I

M a r i n a M a st e r PI a n - Ja n u a r y 9 , 2 O1 2

JJ R

�, , - - - - - - , - - - - - - - - NEW WALK CONNECTION TO
PEDESTRIAN UNDERPASS

RECONFIGURED M-22
ROAD SECTION
(DESIGN TO BE DETERMINED)

. - - - - - - - - - RELOCATED ACCESS INTO
CENTERPOINT PROPERTIES

CONFIRM GRADES PRIOR
TO FINAL DESIGN

DINGHY LAUNCH RAMP

SPECIFIC ENTRANCE LOCATION
TO BE DETERMINED PENDING
RESULTS OF TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT STUDY

SHOPPER'S COURTESY DOCK (6 SLIPS)

PICO DRIVE
ffl'.llll'illll----------------

RAMP TO SHOPPER'S DOCK ! UNIVERSALLY ACCESSIBLE - TYP.)

,•

FISH CLEANING
STATION

~ = - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - REMOVABLE FLOATING DOCK SECTIONS
(SEASONAL IN/OUT OF BOATS)

SHORT TERM PARKING
FOR FISH CLEANING

~ :__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ HARBOR MASTER/ MARINA OFFICE

~=r,,===

GRANDVIEW DRIVE

PUBLIC RESTROOMS (2)
STORAGE (MARINA)

' .

'

1-\:=--.. !E.:/4::::::::~

I

-

l

I

.'

EX I ST I NG BO AT RAM PS TO REMA I N

D-Q-E-K-\- C

~;;:::::::::~ ,--~ -~::-7 ---------t----:----;--____;._

..

I

BO_AT TRAILER
PARKING (79)

:___________:...____

EXI STI NG I NFRA STRUCTURE TO REMA I N

@ 31@
: , : , , 1 1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - ' : ' - --:---.-

L

'♦ : ♦ :'"", _- 3

t

DOG RUN
PICNIC AREA

: - D-O~

81 CNIC ARE A

B

____--:::------------~t:::~=---=~--:-------;-----:-:-7

---

PUBL I C PROM ENA DE
- SEATWALLS

BIKE PARKING

- LANDSCAPING

.
. .

- LIGHTING (SHIELDED)

NEW MARINA COMPLEX

SPECIFIC ENTRANCE LOCATION
TO BE DETERMINED PENDING
RESULTS OF TRAFFIC
MANAGEMENT STUDY

• I
' I

- KEYED BOATER'S FACILITIES

I

DUMPSTER CORRAL
ACCESS CONTROL

''

PICNIC AREA

\

RESTROOMS/SHOWERS

FLEX OFFICE SPACE

LAUNDRY

MULTIPURPOSE ROOM

LOUNGE/MAP ROOM

(SECOND FLOOR)

- PUBLIC FA CILITIES

.

RESTROOMS

NEW SIDEWALKS (6')
&amp; LANDSCAPE BUFFER
EACH SIDE OF M-22

CONCESSIONS
I

' - - - FISHING PIER &amp; PUBLIC PROMENADE
-

- 10-12' WIDE WALK WITH RAILINGS, BENCHES

\

BREWERY CREEK DR IVEJ

" - - - ACCESSIBLE CONNECTION TO
FISHING PIER

.

'

I

Potential First Phase Projects

' - - - - - - BREWERY CREEK
RESTORATION AREA

I

PARKING
EXISTING CONDITIONS
BOAT TRAILER
PASSENGER VEHICLE

134 SPACES
82
SPACES

PREFERRED PLAN

0
0

BOAT TRAILER
PASSENGER VEHICLE

79
90

SPACES
SPACES

( - 42

SPACES)
8 SPACES)

(+

LEGEND

©

OFF-SITE PARKING*

■

BOAT TRAILER
PASSENGER VEHICLE

1 2 0 SPACE
11 0 SPACES

-

( + 6 8 SPACES)
( + 122 SPACES)

ACCESS CONTROL
PICNIC AREA

■

DUMPSTER CORRAL

0

BIKE PARKING

E9

* REFER TO DISTRICT PLAN FOR POTENTIAL SHARED PARKING LOCATIONS.

NUMBER OF PROPOSED SPACES

N

200'

400'

800'

O'

•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••

ELMWOOD TOWNSHIP
Michigan

FIGURE 21

i
'
I

'

'

.

'

.

•·.

I

I

''

PREFERRED PLAN

..

I

I

M a r i n a M a st e r PI a n - Ja n u a r y 9 , 2 O1 2

JJ R

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008081">
                <text>Elmwood-Twp_Waterfront-Master-Plan_2012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008082">
                <text>Smithgroup JJR</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008083">
                <text>2012-01-25</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008084">
                <text>Waterfront District Master Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008085">
                <text>The Waterfront District Master Plan for Elmwood Township was prepared by Smithgroup JJR and was approved on January 25,2012.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008086">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008087">
                <text>Elmwood Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008088">
                <text>Leelanau County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008089">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008091">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008092">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008093">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008094">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038311">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54685" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58956">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/59e186078ff06ebd709c05fa9270e774.pdf</src>
        <authentication>a8c44351ff85ffb3ae5eb37a5c384c87</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008080">
                    <text>Elmwood
Township
Master Plan

Public Hearing Date: March 20, 2018
Adopted by Planning Commission: March 20, 2018

�CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF ELMWOOD
COUNTY OF LEELANAU, MICHIGAN
PC Resolution No. 2018-01
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION TO AMEND MASTER PLAN
WEREAS, the Michigan Planning Enabling Act (MPEA) authorizes the Planning Commission to prepare a Master
Plan for the use, development and preservation of all lands in the Township; and
WEREAS, the Planning Commission prepared a proposed updated Master Plan and submitted the plan to the
Township Board for review and comment; and
WEREAS, on November 13, 2017, the Elmwood Township Board received and reviewed the updated Master Plan
prepared by the Planning Commission and authorized the distribution of the Master Plan to the Notice Group entities
identified in the MPEA; and
and

WEREAS, notice, dated November 14, 2017, was provided to the Notice Group entities as provided in the MPEA;

WEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 20, 2018, after notice published in the Leelanau
Enterprise on March 1, 2018, to consider public comment on the proposed updated Master Plan, and to further review and
comment on the proposed updated Master Plan; and
WEREAS, the Planning Commission finds that the proposed updated Master Plan is desirable and proper and
furthers the use, preservation, and development goals and strategies of the Township;
THEREFORE BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Adoption of the 2018 Master Plan Update. The Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the updated
2018 Master Plan, including all of the chapters, figures, maps and tables contained therein.
2. Distribution to Township Board and Notice Group. Pursuant to MCL 125.3843 The Township Board has not
asserted by resolution its right to approve or reject the proposed Master Plan and therefor the approval granted herein
is the final step for adoption of the plan as provided in MCL 125.3843 and therefore the plan is effective as of March
20, 2018. In addition, the Planning Commission approves distribution of the adopted Master Plan to the Township
Board and Notice Group.
3. Findings of Fact. The Planning Commission has made the foregoing determination based on a review of the
existing land uses in the Township, a review of the existing Master Plan provisions and maps, input received from the
Township Board, public, and Notice Group, as well as the public hearing, and finds that the updated Master Plan will
accurately reflect and implement the Township’s goals and strategies for the use, preservation, and development of
lands in Elmwood Township.
4. Effective Date. The Master Plan shall be effective as of the date of adoption of this resolution.
The foregoing resolution was offered by Planning Commissioner Elliot. Second offered by Planning Commissioner Trevas.
Upon roll call vote, the following voted: Aye: Elliot, Trevas, Roberts, Johnston, Bechtold
Nay: None
Absent: Aprill, Prewitt
The Chair declared the resolution adopted.
________________________________________
George Prewitt, Planning Commission Secretary
2|Page

�Table of Contents
Elmwood Township—A Brief History
Existing Land Use
Natural Features
Goals, Objective &amp; Policies
Future Land Use
Plan Recommendations
Zoning Plan
Plan Implementation Resources
Appendix A – Maps
Future Land Use Map
Soils Map
Public Water System
Public Sewer System
Zoning Map
Greilickville Sub Area Master Plan-Land Use Plan
Appendix B – Demographics
Appendix C – Other Documents

4
8
15
21
31
37
43
44
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
63

3|Page

�This original plan was adopted September 7, 1999 by the Elmwood Township Planning
Commission after a public hearing on August 3, 1999. In 2009, the Elmwood Township
Board directed the Planning Commission not to review the Master Plan until the Elmwood
Township Draft Zoning Ordinance was completed. In August 2016, the Planning Commission
forwarded the Draft Zoning Ordinance to the Township Board for consideration. The
Planning Commission then began the review and update of this Master Plan. After notice
and public hearing, the draft Zoning Ordinance was adopted and became effective on
September 1, 2017. In anticipation of the Master Plan update, the Planning Commission
commissioned a survey in 2013 to be sent to Elmwood Township residents, property
owners, and business owners. The Planning Commission relied on these results in
supplementing the existing Master Plan to create this update.
The 1999 plan was the basis for the update and changes made for the 2017 update. Much of
the text is the same, only updated as necessary for the changes that have occurred in the
almost 20 years since previously written.
Elmwood Township -- A Brief History
Elmwood Township’s history and its present economic and social conditions have been
shaped and determined by its geography and its abundant natural resources. Prior to
European settlement in Elmwood Township, forests were the principal land cover, primarily
sugar maple, elm, basswood, yellow birch, hemlock, and white pine, with poor sandy soil
areas supporting jack pine and red pine barrens, including oak, aspen, red maple, and some
white pines. These forests originally provided for and spurred the economic development of
the area, first by providing the habitat for trapping and then for logging. Being located on the
Great Lakes made this area accessible first to European adventurers and mercantilism, and
later to American settlement and expansion by enabling transportation for export of the
area’s raw materials.
Although there were settlements, forts, and travel routes in the Grand Traverse Bay area
throughout this period, the effects of human activity were not significant until the nineteenth
century when inexpensive land was made available by the federal government, and the
demand for construction wood, railroad ties and trestles, and fuel in expanding communities
throughout the East and Midwest was increasing rapidly.
Seth Hall Norris was the first settler in what is now Elmwood Township.1 He arrived in
Traverse City in 1851 and set up a small saw mill on the creek flowing from Cedar Lake to
the Bay. A tannery followed, then a grist mill, an ice supply business, and finally a brick yard
in 1862.
Norris was bought out by James Markham who became the primary supplier of bricks for the
then burgeoning City of Traverse City. (The Traverse City State Bank, the Masonic Building,
the Hannah &amp; Lay Building, and many of the State Hospital buildings are some of the best1

Wakefield, 1987. Most of the material included in this section is taken from Elmwood Township, a Pictorial History
by Lawrence Wakefield.

4|Page

�known buildings built with Markham bricks). The Norris family also ran the local grocery
store which also housed the post office in what was then called "Norrisville." In 1853, the
Greilick family arrived and began a large steam-powered sawmill near the site of Norris’s
original mill and established and ran docks in West Bay. Except for the Hannah, Lay &amp;
Company, the Greilick Brothers were the largest producers of lumber in the region. They also
began a brewery on the creek in Greilickville that still bears that name. Norrisville, or
Norristown, adopted the name of Greilickville when the Norrisses moved to other parts
shortly after the Greilick family erected its large mill on the bayshore.2
Elmwood Township was also the site of some of the area’s most popular resorts: the Traverse
Beach Resort (also known as the Baptist Resort), the Spring Beach Resort, and Margie’s Court
on Lake Leelanau.3
The Township of Elmwood was organized by the Leelanau County Board of Supervisors on
December 21, 1863. Only about 200 people lived in the Township at that time (with only a
little over 2,000 in the whole county). Originally part of Solon Township was included in
Elmwood Township’s territory, but in 1871 it was reduced to 13,715 acres.4
By the early 1900s most of the virgin timber in the area had been cut over and many of the
farmsteads created on poor soils had reverted back to the state for delinquent taxes. Resale
and cut over of second growth occurred in some areas, but farming of the good lands began
taking hold. State-held properties from abandoned farmlands were being consolidated and
farmers on marginal lands were relocated. The first commercial orchard was planted in
Elmwood Township in 1916. Morgan Orchards, as it was known, was located on M-72, just
west of the present Tom’s Market property.
The railroads had expanded throughout northern lower Michigan by this time, and in 1919,
the state began highway construction with a fifty million dollar bond issue, followed in 1925
by a two-cent per gallon gasoline tax to fund highway construction.5 Also, around 1910, the
state’s urban population exceeded its rural population and was growing at a rate of
approximately 30 percent per decade, with a dramatic increase in per capita wealth as well.6
Better roads, increased incomes and more leisure time led to increased tourism in northern
Michigan. Resorts and summer vacation properties began appearing all along the Grand
Traverse Bay.
Through the 1920s the number of farms increased in the area and the planting of orchards
increased steadily on most of these farms. The largest percentage of farm acreage was used
to produce tart cherries, with apples, sweet cherries and other fruit taking up most of the
rest.
_________________________
Let’s Fly Backwards, Al Barnes, 1976.
Sprague’s History of Grand Traverse and Leelanau Counties, 1903.
4 As a result of annexation, the Township currently encompasses 12,928 acres.
5MSPO, 1995.
6MSPO, 1995.
2
3

5|Page

�During the Great Depression of the 1930s many properties, especially farms in poor soil
areas, reverted to the Michigan State Conservation Department and the U.S. Forest Service
bought thousands of acres. Much of this land was replanted by the Civilian Conservation
Corps which planted almost 500 million trees in Michigan.7 Red and white pine woodlands
are still evidence of these actions.
During the 1930s people left rural areas for the cities and rural population growth halted or
declined. In the 1950s Elmwood Township’s population began to rise again, mounting
steadily over the next decades. By the 1970s much of Michigan’s rural population expanded,
and the Traverse City area’s population in particular, began to grow much more quickly.8
The need for Township zoning was recognized in 1967 when a delegation of citizens
requested controls on increasing development. This population growth has not been in farm
population, but is dominated in Elmwood Township by retirees and others servicing the
increasing tourist trade. The average household size also began to drop dramatically, all of
which has expanded the use of land for non-agricultural purposes and has had a profound
effect on the landscape and ecology of the area.
The style and methods of farming have also changed notably. Small general farms usually
with a specialty cash crop had been the rule until the late 1940s and early 1950s. At this
time, farms began to consolidate and specialize in single commodity crops. Smaller farms
were bought out and much larger enterprises, most commonly orchards of tart and sweet
cherries, apples, plums, and other fruits, were formed. These operations were still familyrun but no longer were self-contained general farms.
In 1986, the Township Board called for the construction of a new Township Hall on Lincoln
Rd. This hall replaced the existing building on Cherry Bend Rd that was shared with the Fire
Department. The Fire Department later constructed a new fire hall immediately adjacent to
the Township Hall in 2001.
In August of 1987 in response to continued population growth in and around Traverse City
and in what the Board believed would be an action to retain the integrity and control over
its territory, the Township Board resolved to change Elmwood Township into a Charter
Township. Despite this action, in June of 1989 the City of Traverse City annexed a portion of
the southeast corner of the Township.
As a method to reduce congestion on M-22 along West Grand Traverse Bay, the Bugai Rd
extension was constructed in the mid-1990s. This connected Bugai Rd to S Lake Leelanau
Dr allowing for North-South connection to the greater Leelanau County. This also led to the
installation of a signalized intersection at Bugai and M-72 at a later date.

______________________
7Titus,
8Ferris

1945.
&amp; McVeigh, 1995.

6|Page

�In the 2000s the Total Petroleum/Marathon Oil property was decommissioned. This was
the end of using the West Grand Traverse Bay as a way to transport petroleum to the area.
All of the tanks and pipes associated with this use were removed in 2017.
The Township began to construct and expand their marina facilities in the 1990s with the
construction of Dock A. Today there are 3 docks, that have 190 slips in the marina. Twentyone are for transient uses and the remaining are for seasonal lease. In 2018, the Township
will start a 3-phase construction project on the marina to update facilities.

7|Page

�Existing Land Use
Since much of the existing land use remained the same from 1999 to 2018, only minor
changes were made to this section. There was no field survey conducted, only aerial
photography taken in 2012 and personal knowledge from Planning Commissioners
and staff.
The basic and essential data necessary for any planning study is an inventory and analysis of
existing land uses within the community. A knowledge of the existing land development
pattern and site conditions furnishes the basic information by which future residential,
commercial, industrial, and public land use decisions can be made. In the course of exercising
its zoning powers, the controlling municipality must give reasonable consideration to the
character of each area and its suitability for particular uses. An inventory of existing land use
furthers this objective.
The existing land use map and acreage tabulation, which are included in this chapter, will
also serve as a ready reference for the Township in its consideration of land use and
infrastructure improvement proposals.
Methodology
A field survey was conducted in 1998 to gather existing land use data. Each parcel of
property in Elmwood Township was inspected in the field and its use characteristics
recorded on an updated base map. Aerial photographs were used as supplementary
information to determine land use boundaries, agricultural locations, etc.
General Pattern of Land Use
Elmwood Township has four distinctive sub-areas: Greilickville, the M-22 corridor, the
Timberlee Resort area, and, finally, the rural portion of the Township which consists of the
majority of the land in the Township.
Greilickville
Greilickville, so named in the mid-1800s after a predominant lumbering family, has
developed into the primary commercial area of the Township. While the majority of
residents of Elmwood Township rely heavily on Traverse City for their shopping and
commercial needs, the Greilickville and Cherry Bend area has developed into a small but vital
commercial, office, medical and light industrial area. The activities in the harbor area are
recreation and pleasure boating with the Elmwood Marina, Greilickville Harbor Park,
Discovery Pier &amp; Harbor, Children’s Museum as well as the other marinas and docks along
the West Arm of the Grand Traverse Bay. There are also small shops, restaurants, and gas
stations in the Greilickville area. The majority of Greilickville is serviced with public sewer
and water and is also the portion of the Township that is most densely populated with many
single-family subdivisions clustered between E. Grandview and Cherry Bend Roads.
8|Page

�M-22 Corridor
With the exception of Pathfinder school, a
small motel, and rental cottages clustered
along M-22, just north of Cedar Lake, the M22 corridor has been developed as a
predominantly single-family, detached
residential corridor. M-22 is the Township’s
primary north-south road, running adjacent
to the West Arm of Grand Traverse Bay, and
leads to the Village of Northport to the north
and Traverse City to the south. The majority
of development has been individual
residential lots fronting M-22 with a
scattering of residential subdivisions including Forest Hills, La Riviera, Cedar Cove and the
Valley Estates at the northern border of the Township. Exceptional views of the Bay can be
seen while traversing M-22.
In 2016, the Township completed a traffic study on the M-22 corridor from the Township
line North to Cherry Bend Rd. The results of the survey were that a traffic signal between
Carter Rd and Cherry Bend Rd was not warranted and that to improve traffic congestion an
access management plan should be investigated. The Greilickville Sub Area Master Plan
states that parking lots should be connected to aid in the flow for traffic and allow for
reduced left hand turning movements.
Timberlee Resort
The Timberlee area is a second population node found on the west side of the Township. It
has developed with townhouse-style condominiums, single family houses, and an old lodge
that has been converted to an event center. Timberlee was developed as a ski resort in the
1970s, and is now used as a snow tubing hill, the property has remained largely intact and
under single ownership. The Timberlee area is serviced with public water making it a
desirable and scenic location for residential development.
Rural Environment
The remainder of the Township is rural in character with the exception of single-family
homes along the shoreline of Lake Leelanau and some scattered residential development and
homesites. Much of the remaining land is used for agriculture and orchard production or is
heavily wooded or wetland areas. When not in a subdivision, residential development occurs
predominantly along section line roads and on large lots.

9|Page

�Land Use Distribution
Each existing land use was placed in one of eight general land use categories. Elmwood
Township encompasses 12,928 acres, or 20.2 square miles. Data in Table 1 indicate the total
acreage occupied by each land use type and its proportion of the total land area in the
Township. A discussion of each land use is provided later in this section. From 1999 to 2018,
few developments were approved in the Township. Because of this, the existing land use
calculations were not updated with the 2018 update.

Table 1
Existing Land Use Acreage, 1999 Elmwood
Township, Leelanau County

Land Use Category

Acres

Percent of
Total

Agricultural/Orchards

3,353

25.9

Single-Family Residential

2,845

22.0

Multiple-Family
Residential
Office

74

0.6

9

0.06

Commercial

97

0.8

Industrial

111

0.9

Public

145

1.1

Vacant, Woodlands, Other

6,294

48.7

Total

12,928

100.0

Source: Wade-Trim/Elmwood Township Field Survey, January 1999.

The land use classification system used for this analysis is a derivative of the Michigan Land
Cover/Use Classification System which was developed by the Michigan Department of
Natural Resources for use in statewide current use inventories. The following defines the
land use classifications used to categorize existing land uses and describes the distribution
of those uses.

10 | P a g e

�Agricultural/Orchards
This category includes all areas where the principal land use
classification is agricultural and includes lands under
cultivation, horse farms, ranching operations, pastures,
orchards, vineyards, cherry processors, nurseries and
greenhouses and tree farms as observed from field
observation, from review of aerial photographs, and/or as
indicated by Township officials.
These lands are primarily located in areas of good agricultural
soils with no existing or planned public sewer and water
service. It is the intent of the Township to promote the
conservation of agricultural lands and protect existing farms
from the costs frequently associated with development.
There are 3,353 acres, or 25.9 percent of the total Township
land so classified. Most of this acreage is utilized for farming
purposes, orchards including vineyards and hops, or is lying
fallow. Also included in this category are the cherry grower’s
co-op found in Section 8. Small hobby farms and small crop
farms (less than ten acres) are not included in this category.
Single-Family Residential
The single-family residential category includes site-built single-family detached structures
used as a permanent dwelling, manufactured (modular) dwelling or mobile homes located
outside of designated mobile home parks, duplexes (two-family dwellings), and accessory
buildings such as garages that are related to these units. It also includes small farmsteads
and related agricultural buildings located near the primary dwelling. This category includes
a number of single-family subdivisions scattered throughout the Township. These include
Hidden Hills, Cherry Bend Heights, Harbor Hills, Cedar Lake Gardens, Leelanau Hills, Valley
Hills, Shoreside Valley, and several others.
Single-family residential development occupies 2,845 acres of land, or about 22.0 percent of
the Township’s land area. While the majority of homes are located within organized
subdivisions, many single-family homes are located on large lots which front section line
roads.
In cases where large parcels currently have only one residence, much of the parcel may be
shown as vacant land. This is done to acknowledge the possibility that this undeveloped area
may be someday developed. In cases where a large parcel (10+ acres) is part of a plat or
subdivision, the entire parcel is shown as yellow to indicate that no additional splits will be
allowed in this location.

11 | P a g e

�Multiple-Family Residential
The multiple-family residential category includes structures with more than one unit on the
same site. These may be duplexes, apartments, or townhouses developed individually or in
complexes, senior housing facilities, and mobile home parks. It also includes related lawn
areas, parking lots, and any accessory recreation facility.
Multiple-family development accounts for about 74 acres, or 0.6 percent of the land area in
Elmwood Township. Major developments include the condominiums adjacent to the old
Timberlee, the senior housing to the west of Cedar Lake, and the mobile home park in the
northwest portion of the Township. Field observations reveal that these developments are
well-maintained and in relatively good condition.
Traditionally, multiple-family developments have provided a transitional land use between
single-family areas and nonresidential developments or have been located along primary
roadways to benefit from the additional exposure offered by high traffic corridors. This is
not necessarily the case in Elmwood Township where there are only a few multiple family
developments and they are scattered throughout the community in no definable pattern
although many do have public water or sewer available.
Office
The office category includes business, financial, medical, professional
offices, and related service establishments.
Approximately nine acres, or 0.06 percent of the Township acreage is
devoted to this land use. Existing office development is relatively
confined to the Greilickville area and Cherry Bend Rd. The most
significant office development within the Township is the Center
Pointe (formally Great Lake Insurance) office building located near the
Elmwood Township Marina and Viridian (formally OneUpWeb)
building located near the intersection of Carter Rd and M-22.
Commercial
The commercial category includes convenience stores, comparison shopping centers, and
general commercial businesses.
At the present time, there are approximately 97 acres occupied by commercial uses or about
0.8 percent of the total Township land area. Most of this development is again clustered along
M-22 in the Greilickville area, just north of the Traverse City border.
Commercial development is fairly limited within the Township as residents depend
primarily on Traverse City for their commercial needs. Commercial uses within the
Township include small shops, restaurants, and mini storage.
12 | P a g e

�Light Manufacturing/Industrial
The industrial category includes manufacturing, assembling and general fabricating
facilities, warehouses, and non-manufacturing uses which are industrial in their character
(significant outdoor storage or shipping/receiving requirements).
Approximately 111 acres, or 0.9 percent of the Township land area is used for industrial
purposes. The approximately 80-acre gravel pit, located in Section 19 of the Township,
occupies the largest portion of industrial land in Elmwood. The decommissioned Marathon
gasoline storage tank farm, located in the Greilickville area, is also a primary industrial land
use within the Township.
Public
The public land use category includes publicly owned land for cultural, public assembly,
recreational purposes, educational uses (including all types of public institutions where
education is a primary use), and governmental administration and service buildings.
Privately owned lands that are best characterized as educational, religious or open land
which is used for recreational purposes and open to the public are considered semi-public
uses and, thus, included in this category. Places of worship are examples of semi-public uses.
Pathfinder, a private school, is also located within the Township, along M-22. Also included
in this category are the Township Hall, Old Fire Station, Cherry Bend Park, Brewery Creek,
DeYoung Natural Area, and TART trail.
Rotary Camps and Services owns the Discovery Center &amp; Pier, adjacent to the Township
Greilickville Harbor Park, which includes the Children’s Museum and other non-profits
participants related to the water. Grand Traverse Regional Art Campus/Leelanau Studios
acquired the old Norris School and offers a location for arts and is a semi-public location to
the community.
Approximately 145 acres, or 1.1 percent of the total land area within the Township is
categorized as public land. More details on public land within the Township can be found in
the Township Park and Recreation Plan.

13 | P a g e

�Vacant, Woodlands, Other
This land use category includes vacant land for which no specific use is evident, undeveloped
wooded areas, all dedicated rights-of-way including county roads, thoroughfares, and local
roads. Approximately 6,294 acres, or 48.7 percent of the Township falls within this
description.

14 | P a g e

�Natural Features
Natural features, such as topography, soils, wetlands, woodlands and lakes help shape a
community’s identity. New land developments can significantly impact natural features and,
consequently, effect community character. Special attention should be given to the
preservation of natural and environmentally sensitive areas in long-range planning. The
purpose of this chapter is to identify the important natural features which exist in Elmwood
Township. Knowing the location of significant natural features and understanding the
function of natural systems will enable the Township to accomplish two important
objectives. 1. The Township will be able to channel, or encourage, development into areas
which are the least environmentally sensitive. 2. The Township can work to minimize
adverse impacts to these areas.
Environmentally sensitive areas are lands whose destruction or disturbance will
immediately affect the life of a community by:
•
•
•

Creating hazards such as flooding or slope erosion;
Contaminating important public resources such as groundwater supplies or surface
water bodies; or,
Wasting important productive lands and renewable resources.

Each of these effects is detrimental to the general welfare of a community and may result in
economic loss.9
The natural features inventoried in this chapter include climate, geology, topography, soils,
and hydrological features as well as natural habitats and airsheds. The analysis of natural
features identifies which areas of the Township are most suitable for development and which
lands should remain undeveloped to conserve their natural function.
Climate
Elmwood Township’s climate is greatly affected by its location on the Grand Traverse Bay.
As is detailed in the following table, this quasi-marine climate moderates changes in
temperature and precipitation and allows a longer frost-free growing period for plants than
would be usual at this latitude. The average growing season for the Township is
approximately 120- 140 days and the average annual rainfall is 32 inches. The mean annual
temperature is 46° F. The mean number of day per year that exceed 90°F is 6 with the mean
number of days per year that fall below 32°F is 145. The average daily maximum and
minimum temperatures in January are 28°F and 16°F, and in July are 81°F and 58°F. The
average snowfall is 100 inches.10
_________________________
Charles Thurow, William Toner, and Duncan Erley Performance controls for Sensitive Lands, American
Planning Association, Planning Advisory Service Reports 307-308, June 1975
10 Great Lakes Integrated Sciences Assessments, Historical Climatology: Traverse City, MI, Updated 3/11/16
9

15 | P a g e

�First and last heavy freeze dates are of concern to growers in all areas, including Elmwood
Township. According to National Weather Service, temperatures below 29 degrees
Fahrenheit are uncommon after May 1st and before October 25th in the Traverse City area.
Table 2
Temperatures and Precipitation in Traverse City, MI1,2
Temperature
Precipitation
Average
Average
Average
Average
Minimum
Maximum
Rain
Snow
January
16.26°F
28.79°F
1.866 in
31.11 in
February
16.17°F
31.29°F
1.267 in
19.22 in
March
22.27°F
40.67°F
1.489 in
10.6 in
April
33.09°F
54.85°F
2.483 in
3.16 in
May
42.47°F
66.83°F
2.501 in
0.63 in
June
52.48°F
75.67°F
2.921 in
0 in
July
58.21°F
80.88°F
2.697 in
0 in
August
57.35°F
78.52°F
2.99 in
0 in
September 50.02°F
70.50°F
3.489 in
0 in
October
39.36°F
57.47°F
3.081 in
0.64 in
November 31.14°F
45.13°F
2.368 in
8.98 in
December 21.18°F
32.72°F
2.058 in
26.64 in
1 Great Lakes Integrated Sciences Assessments, Historical Climatology: Traverse City, MI, Updated
3/11/16
2 Michigan State Climatologist’s Office, climate.geo.msu.edu Traverse City, MI 1981-2010
Geology
An Ellsworth Shale bedrock underlies the Elmwood Township area at a depth of
approximately 400 feet. This geologic formation is the result of marine conditions that
existed approximately 325 million years ago during the Mississippian period of the Paleozoic
era.
The glacial drift that overlies bedrock was primarily deposited during the Valders Maximum
glacial event, approximately 11,500 years ago. Township lands were formed when this last
glacial ice sheet retreated and the melt waters receded to form the existing lake shorelines,
beaches, bluffs, and lake benches. Lake Algonquian shoreline dynamics (elevation 605 feet)
sculpted the drift and had a major impact on the current land formation. Lake Algonquin
resulted from the coalescence of glacial Lakes Saginaw and Chicago.

16 | P a g e

�Topography
The topography of Elmwood Township was created by the receding Wisconsin ice age
glaciers that left the Manistee moraine stretching from Kalkaska around Traverse City into
Leelanau County, forming a large plateau in the south and on the eastern edge of the
township. North of the Manistee moraine and in the northern two thirds of the township is a
large ground moraine. The ground moraine is characterized by hills (drumlins) roughly ¼ to
2 miles long and 1/8-mile-wide that rise 35 to 100 feet above the adjacent creeks and other
drainage ways. Glacial lake plains are associated with the shore areas of the Grand Traverse
Bay.
The entire Township, with the exception of the southwest sections and areas surrounding
Lake Leelanau, are relatively hilly. The majority of land north of Cedar Lake and along the
Bay has slopes greater than 20% as do Sections 29 and 32 in the southeastern portion of the
Township near the Hidden Hills development and south of Cedar Creek.
Surface elevations range from a mean lake level at the Bay of 580 feet to approximately 1,100
feet near the southern boundary of the Township, an elevation gradient of 527 feet. The
highest point in the Township (1,110 above sea level) located in the southwest corner, is also
the highest point in Leelanau County. Areas of steep topography present many challenges,
both in terms of land development and for recreation-conservation purposes. Development
in such areas should be undertaken with caution in regards to erosion and drainage hazards
that may affect adjacent properties.
Soils
Soil conditions may also present significant limitations to development and assist in
determining what land is most suitable for development and what land is most suitable for
agricultural, recreation and conservation purposes. Identification and analysis of soils aids
in determining which areas offer maximum amenities without adversely impacting natural
systems.
Most of the soils of the Township are ground up rock material laid down by glaciers,
predominately sandy, well-drained soils, ranging from 50 to 600 feet in depth, with deposits
of gravel and clay in many spots.
As reported in the Soil Survey of Leelanau County, prepared by the US Soil Conservation
Service (SCS), there are three major soil associations in Elmwood Township: East LakeEastport-Lupton, Leelanau-Mancelona, and Emmet-Leelanau. The majority of soils in the
Township are of the Leelanau-Mancelona association and are strongly sloping to very steep,
well-drained sandy soils. Specifically, these soils are found in the southeastern portion of the
Township including Sections 19, 24, 25, 29, 30, 31, 32 and 36. The soils along Lake Leelanau,
surrounding Belnap and Mann Creeks and Cedar Lake as well as those in the Greilickville
area are East Lake-Eastport-Lupton association. These soils vary from moderately welldrained on gently sloping lands to mucky, very poorly drained on lake and creek terraces.
17 | P a g e

�The balance of the soils in the northcentral portion of the Township are Emmet-Leelanau
association. The soils are well-drained, loamy and sandy soils in areas that vary from nearly
level to very steep. All of these soils can be moderately productive for forestry and are good
for woodland wildlife habitat, but only fair for habitat when left open or un-forested.
In general, the Emmet-Leelanau and Leelanau-Mancelona association have agricultural
suitability but because of their varying water retaining capacities, also vary widely in
productive capability. As depicted on the map, prime farmlands are scattered throughout the
Township with significant areas located in Sections 1, 5, 6, 12, 18 and 20.
Individual on-site study and testing should be conducted prior to site design and
construction due to the fact that many of the soils in the Township may have limitations
either because of wetness in low soil areas, steepness of the slopes, or because of seepage or
potential of poor filtering problems for septic systems.
Hydrological Features
Watersheds
Elmwood Township is located within the Lake Michigan Watershed Basin of northern Lower
Michigan, and the entire eastern border abuts the West Arm of the Grand Traverse Bay. The
main watersheds of the Township are the Belnap and Mann Creeks and the creek associated
with Cedar Lake, all of which drain about half of the Township. Areas along the Grand
Traverse Bay and Lake Leelanau are drained directly or through various small creek systems.
The southwestern area of the Township is associated with the Weisler Creek Watershed and
the Cedar Run Watershed which drain into south Lake Leelanau.
Wetlands
Wetlands can be described as marshes, bogs, swamps, potholes, sloughs, shallow lakes, and
ponds. Wetlands may be temporary, permanent, static, or flowing. They are areas of natural
vegetation growing in shallow water, hydric (saturated) soil, or seasonally flooded
environments. They may also include areas of mature tree cover commonly associated with,
but not restricted to, floodplain environments. More than any other natural landform,
wetlands are working landscapes whose ecosystem meets a variety of needs. They support
a rich variety of wildlife, purify water, help contain flooding, and provide scenic and natural
vistas.

18 | P a g e

�The majority of wetlands in Elmwood follow the valleys and course of creeks and streams
meandering through the Township. It is interesting to compare the location of wetlands to
the current development pattern. Significant development has not occurred in the
immediate vicinity of Cedar Lake, particularly the western side. Land is also undeveloped in
the southern portion of the Township in Section 33, just west of M-22 and north of the
Traverse City border. Again, on-site investigation should be conducted for a more accurate
delineation of wetland boundaries. Since the wetlands have not been delineated,
delineations should occur prior to development.
Bodies of Water
Besides their obvious aesthetic and recreational benefits, lakes and ponds serve as natural
retention areas for storm water runoff, as a groundwater recharge area, as habitat for a
number of species of animals and plants, and tend to moderate the microclimate in proximity
to the shoreline. Protection of these natural assets should be given high priority in future
land use planning decisions.
Drinking water quality is generally good in Elmwood Township and there appears to be
abundant quantity. The exception is found in some areas of the urbanized corridor, near the
Traverse City boundary. The Benzie-Leelanau Health Department depends upon well logs
and water samples from surrounding properties when making assessments for new
installations and developments.
The water resources within the Township are extensive and serve as a primary recreational
opportunity for residents of Elmwood as well as the surrounding area. Elmwood Township’s
entire eastern border, over 35,000 feet, fronts the West Arm of the Grand Traverse Bay. The
Township also has over 6,500 feet of frontage on the picturesque Lake Leelanau as well as
the approximately 250-acre Cedar Lake. There are also several streams located within the
Township including Belnap Creek, Mann Creek, and Cedar Creek.
Natural Habitats
Elmwood Township lies in the Temperate Deciduous Biome of the Eastern United States.
This biome encompasses many different natural communities. Communities are naturallyoccurring assemblages of plants and animals on the landscape that co-exist under the
influence of soil, climate, hydrology, disturbance regime, intra-species association, and other
factors. A classification of natural communities seeks to group species assemblages into
types that share similar characteristics. Elmwood Township has a number of communities
including dry-mesic northern forests, mesic northern forests, cobble beaches, northern wet
meadows and emergent marshes.
Most of Elmwood Township is found within the Traverse City subdistrict of the Leelanau
District natural region. The Traverse City subdistrict of the Leelanau District is characterized
by drumlin fields, which distinguishes it from adjacent subdistricts. These drumlins are long
narrow ridges, usually about ¼-mile-wide, and less than 100 feet high. Slopes are gently
sloping to steep, with slightly acid to acidic, sandy loams and loamy sands that are mostly
19 | P a g e

�well-drained. Swamps, marshes, and small lakes or ponds are found between some of the
drumlins. Sand, gravel, and cobble beaches occur along the Great Lakes shoreline, with
limited areas of former lake-plain. While most of the arable land in the subdistrict is used for
orchards and vineyards or is fallow shrub land, remnants of the original northern hardwood
forests remain on many of the steeply sloping drumlins.
Woodland areas are an important part of the complex ecological system, providing multiple
benefits to the environment and its wildlife and human inhabitants. Woodlands play a role
in flood protection by slowing the flow of surface run-off to allow for greater storm water
infiltration. Woodlands also reduce air pollutants by absorbing certain air borne pollutants.
In addition to providing wildlife habitats, forest vegetation moderates the effects of winds
and temperatures while stabilizing and enriching the soil. For human inhabitants, forested
areas offer a visual and audio barrier, which is considered aesthetically pleasing and offer
unique opportunities for recreation and relaxation.
Woodland resources contribute greatly to the Township's environmental quality. The
conservation of woodlands will play a positive role in maintaining and enhancing the future
environmental character of the Township. Woodland areas should be conserved, as possible.
Trees which are removed through development actions should be replaced. Of special
concern will be the fragmentation of woodland areas through parcel subdivisions in and
adjacent to wooded areas.

According to aerial photographs which were taken in the 2012, and a windshield survey
conducted, woodlands are scattered throughout Elmwood Township, with the most
significant areas found in Sections 4, 5, 7, 8, 9, 12, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 24.
Human development has fragmented and isolated former natural communities into vestiges
of their pre-European settlement patterns. Wetlands and wetland habitat is associated with
the creeks and the southern Lake Leelanau lakeshore. Deer, raccoons, and opossum, as well
as many species of birds, reptiles, and other animals and plants occupy these areas and the
forested hillsides. Connecting remaining lowland corridors and forest stands can provide
important habitat and refuge for Township wildlife.
Airshed
It is evident that despite our present relatively pristine conditions of clean air, we are not
immune to these up-wind influences nor to those we create ourselves. Great strides have
been made in reducing point-source air pollution, but non-point (or mobile) air pollution
continues to be a severe problem due to our continued increased use of automobiles and
other internal combustion engines. This pollution is injurious to the entire environment -flora, fauna, and us.

20 | P a g e

�Goals, Objectives &amp; Policies
Before a community can actively plan for its future growth and development, it must first set
certain goals and objectives that define the boundaries of its needs and aspirations and, thus,
establish a basis for the formulation of a Master Plan. Given realistic social and economic
constraints, these goals and objectives must reflect the type of community desired and the
kind of lifestyle its citizens wish to follow. Goals describe the ultimate purpose of the
Elmwood Township Master Plan, objectives outline the means to help the Township achieve
its goals, and policies recommend specific tasks to guide action.
Formulation Process
The process of developing goals and objectives for the Elmwood Township Master Plan
involved multiple steps. Initially, in early 1996, Elmwood Township conducted a community
attitude survey on several issues including land use and the future development of the
Township. Second, the Planning Commission and Township officials studied background
information on the community including the existing land use pattern, natural features, soils,
slopes, and socioeconomic characteristics of the Township and surrounding areas. Finally,
the Leelanau County General Plan was reviewed and referenced to ensure County-wide
concerns were examined and addressed.
The 2018 update was started with a survey that took place in 2013. The update was stalled
by the Draft Zoning Ordinance but once it was forwarded to the Township Board, the
Planning Commission began review and update of the Master Plan in 2016. Much of the
update was based on the existing plan as the survey did not provide a change of opinion on
the future development of the Township.
Community Attitude Survey
In early 1996, the Elmwood Township Planning Commission prepared the “Elmwood
Township Community Attitude Survey”. The survey was intended to solicit the opinions of
Township residents on various topics and issues in order to assist them in preparing a
Master Plan for the Township. In November of 1996, the Elmwood Township Board
distributed 1,800 surveys to the property owners of the Township. Seven-hundred fifteen
(715) surveys were returned and tabulated for a remarkable response rate of 40%. The
response rate alone indicates the residents intense interest in the future development of the
Township. A reoccurring theme throughout the survey results is the community’s desire to
protect the natural resources in the Township including forests, lakes, wetlands, farms, hills,
and streams. Many respondents were also adamant about limiting commercial development
within the Township and satisfied with depending on Traverse City for their shopping,
dining, and commercial needs.

21 | P a g e

�In anticipation of the 2018 update to the Elmwood Township Master Plan, the Planning
Commission prepared a survey in 2013 that was sent to all occupants, property owners, and
business owners to solicit opinions on various topics important for future development. A
total of 494 surveys were returned. The survey results showed that the respondents would
like the Township to focus on non-motorized trails and parks and encourage residential uses
in the commercial district. Respondents were in support of ordinances restricting blight and
noise, and regulations regarding septic and stormwater.
Background Studies
At a March 1998 Master Plan workshop, the Township reviewed background studies
including natural features, socio-economics, housing, and existing land use within Elmwood.
The natural features section detailed the climate, geology, topography, soils, and
hydrological features within the Township. The analysis of natural features resulted in the
identification of areas within the Township that are most suitable for development and
which lands should remain undeveloped to conserve their natural function. The socioeconomic analysis revealed that the Township housing stock is relatively new, the
population is well educated and, judging from the analysis of the age of Township residents
and the high number of people in the family formation age group, the Township is a good
place to settle and raise a family. An existing land use survey was also conducted and mapped
to illustrate the current development pattern in the Township. The survey revealed four
primary land use areas within Elmwood: Greilickville, the M-22 Corridor, the Timberlee
Resort area, and finally the rural portion of the Township.
Greilickville has developed as the primary commercial and industrial area of the Township
and is surrounded by relatively dense single-family development. With a few exceptions, M22 has developed as a single-family residential corridor with excellent views of the Bay.
Timberlee was an old ski resort that has developed into its own population node. The area is
serviced with a public water system, which helps in making the otherwise isolated area into
a more desirable hamlet. The remainder of the Township, with the exception of residential
development surrounding Lake Leelanau and Cedar Lake, and some scattered subdivision
developments, is rural in character. The Township has historically been and continues to be
a community in which farming and orchards play a significant role. The Township and its
residents are committed to supporting farming activities within the Township and
protecting them from encroaching development.
Leelanau County General Plan
The Leelanau County General Plan: Policy Guidelines for Managing Growth on the Leelanau
Peninsula is a series of working papers prepared by Leelanau County staff members to
update/revise the Leelanau County Comprehensive Development Plan. The latest County Plan
was adopted in 2012. Working Paper Number 6 of the series is entitled Goals and Objectives
for Managing Growth on the Leelanau Peninsula. The document was reviewed in the process
of developing the Elmwood Township goals and objectives to ensure county-wide issues
were considered and appropriately addressed.

22 | P a g e

�The goals and objectives described in the Leelanau County plan address the following issues:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Growth Management
Land Use Planning
Community Character
Special Environments and Open Spaces
Environmental Quality
Agriculture, Farming, Mining and Fisheries
Commercial and Industrial
Jobs and Economic Development
Housing
Public Facilities and Services
Intergovernmental Coordination

The results of the formulation steps, summarized above, is the basis of the action plan. Goals
are identified below, each of which have objectives or strategies for a means for attaining the
goal.
Planning and Growth Management
Goal:
To guide future growth and development in a manner that respects both the natural
environment and the Township’s rural atmosphere, promotes an efficient and well-ordered
land use pattern, and economizes community facilities.
Objectives:
•

Accommodate future growth within the Township while maintaining its existing
rural/residential character.

•

Ensure that new land uses are compatible and in character with existing uses.

•

Encourage the ongoing maintenance of properties, buildings, and public facilities.

•

Guide new development in a manner that conserves natural features and
environmentally sensitive areas and meets the long-term needs of the community.

•

Balance the rate of land development with the availability of public facilities and
services such as adequate roads and public water and sanitary sewer systems.
Encourage development where those types of facilities and services currently exist.

•

Promote cooperation with and among other governmental units and nongovernmental stakeholders in Leelanau County and the Grand Traverse Bay Region.

23 | P a g e

�Strategies:
•

Update the Master Plan at least every five years, with updates to objectives and
strategies as needed to ensure the plan remains current, reflects the vision of
Township residents, and encompasses new issues and planning techniques.

•

Annually update a Capital Improvements Plan for the Township with review
requirements for the Planning Commission adopted as part of the Zoning Ordinance.

•

Amend the Township Zoning Ordinance to implement the recommendations made in
this plan.

•

Continue to encourage and solicit citizen
participation and community involvement in all
facets of Township life.

•

Encourage redevelopment and infill in order to
maximize existing public utilities and decrease
sprawl.

Environmental Features and Agricultural Land
Goal:
Protect environmentally sensitive areas such as agricultural
and orchard lands, wetlands, bodies of water, steep slopes,
and groundwater recharge areas.
Objectives:
•

Encourage the retention of important farmlands,
orchards, vineyards, forest lands, open space areas, and woodlands.

•

Protect the quality of surface and groundwater resources in the Township from
development related impacts.

Strategies:
•

Encourage the retention of productive agricultural and forest lands through available
mechanisms such as open space and farmland agreements, forest stewardship
programs, and conservation easements, as well as local zoning incentives.

•

Encourage property owners to practice planned management, or stewardship, of
privately-owned forest lands, wetlands and other environmental sensitive areas.

•

Encourage the establishment of a continuous open space system that interconnects
public and private natural areas and recreational facilities, as well as providing for
24 | P a g e

�wildlife habitat.
•

Encourage the inclusion of parks, bicycle and pedestrian linkages and open space
areas in new and established developments.

•

Ensure that all county, state, and federal environmental regulations are adhered to in
the development of land.

•

Encourage land use planning and site design that provides for efficient land use and
takes into account natural features (soils, topography, hydrology, woodlands, and
natural vegetation), conserves agricultural resources, and maintains scenic vistas.

•

Adopt coordinated zoning provisions which provide adequate buffers between
agricultural and adjacent land uses to protect the future viability of the farmlands.

•

Encourage the maintenance of undisturbed natural buffers around bodies of water,
wetlands, and other sensitive environmental systems.

•

Develop site plan review regulations which will help protect the community’s
drinking water supply.

•

Discourage development on slopes greater than 18 percent and ensure adequate
development controls for construction on slopes with an incline of 12 to 18 percent.
Further, encourage hillside development to be designed in consideration of
topography.

•

Encourage development to conserve scenic views, agricultural lands, wetland areas,
bodies of water, groundwater recharge areas, steep slopes and other environmentally
sensitive areas. Encourage cluster developments.

Residential Land Use
Goal:
To maintain the current housing stock and to plan for new residential development that will
offer a variety of residential densities and styles to meet the needs of current and future
residents.
Objectives:
•

Provide for a range of residential styles and densities to meet the needs of the
Township’s diverse population.

•

Encourage the development of residential neighborhoods that are well-integrated
into the existing landscape and complement the character of existing neighborhoods.
25 | P a g e

�Strategies:
•

Encourage and guide the development of housing at densities that relate to natural
and manmade features.

•

Collaborate with other governmental units, non-governmental stakeholders and
agencies to develop opportunities for housing for the Township’s diverse population.

•

Encourage the incorporation of existing vegetation, topography, and other natural
features into the design of new residential developments.

•

Encourage new residential developments to be sited in a manner that protects the
Township’s rural character and scenic views by maintaining proper setbacks and
providing landscaping screening as appropriate.

•

Discourage a pattern of scattered rural housing development on overly large lots,
particularly in areas of productive agricultural or forest lands.

•

Through site plan review regulations, provide that the layout of new residential
developments to be logical extensions of existing neighborhoods. This shall apply to
lot layout, road extensions, and open space plans.

•

Encourage infill and higher density housing on lands that have or are planned to have
the capacity to support such development by means of public roads and utilities.

•

Encourage cluster housing and other creative forms of development to permit higher
density housing while protecting the Township’s rural character and balancing the
needs of the agricultural community with the interests of the non-farm residents.

•

Through zoning district Special Use Permit regulation, allow compatible nonresidential land uses which help build and maintain the local sense of community,
particularly in relation to future Planned Development.

•

Consideration should be given to multi-generational and workforce housing.

Commercial Land Use
Goal:
To maintain the existing commercial base and encourage only limited commercial
development that satisfies local market needs without compromising the Township’s
rural/residential character.

26 | P a g e

�Objectives:
•

Provide limited but reasonable opportunities for the establishment of commercial
uses that meet the demonstrated market needs of local residents.

•

Recognize Traverse City as a regional retail center which meets the majority of
resident needs and support the continued economic viability of downtown Traverse
City.

•

Encourage limited local commercial development to occur in the established
Greilickville area in the vicinity of M-22. Discourage commercial development from
spreading along major thoroughfares outside of that area.

•

Ensure that the architecture, landscaping, and signage associated with commercial
establishments is compatible with the established character of the Township.

•

Comply with the principles of the Greilickville Sub Area Master Plan.

•

Encourage quality construction materials, such as brick, wood and stone, that will
provide aesthetically pleasing structures. Steel structures to be located behind other
buildings to limit viability from right-of-ways.

Strategies:
•

Maintain the City of Traverse City as the commercial focal point for residents of
Elmwood Township.

•

Improve the overall aesthetics and encourage the maintenance and restoration of
structures in the Greilickville area and along M-22.

•

Review commercial architectural, landscape, and signage designs to ensure that any
such proposed uses are carefully integrated into the Township’s landscape and reflect
the character of the community.

•

Require the establishment of transitional uses and/or landscape screening between
commercial and residential, agricultural, or open space land uses.

•

Develop an access management plan for the commercial areas as recommended by
the 2016 Elmwood Township Traffic Study (see appendix).

•

Encourage development that provides efficient traffic flow by coordinating and
facilitating shared driveways and interconnected parking areas.

27 | P a g e

�Industrial Land Use
Goal:
Provide locations for limited, light industrial development which are harmonious with the
existing land use pattern and the rural/residential character of the community.
Objectives:
Ensure that the location, architecture, landscaping, and signage associated with
industrial establishments is compatible with the established character of the
community and environment.
Strategies:
•

•

Encourage industrial development which is primarily research oriented, light, and
environmentally clean.

•

Light industrial uses that might be located near existing residences shall not
negatively impact adjacent neighborhoods and shall be encouraged to provide
landscaping and other elements to minimize any potential conflict between the uses.

•

Discourage industrial development which will negatively impact environmentally
sensitive areas or require substantial changes to natural systems.

Recreation Land Use
Goal:
Continue to improve existing recreational facilities and expand recreational facilities for
Township residents.
Objectives:
•

Provide for public and semi-public use areas offering a variety of recreational
opportunities that facilitate public use.

Strategies:
•

Follow the action program set forth in the Township’s adopted Park and Recreation
Plan to the extent that local resources allow. Keep the Plan updated as required by
state statute.

•

Provide public facilities and encourage private community facilities in size, character,
function, and location suitable to the population and needs of the community.

28 | P a g e

�•

Encourage citizen participation and utilize professional expertise to determine
needed and desired public and semi-public improvements.

•

Research alternative methods and manners of providing public and semi-public
services and choose those most conducive to citizen needs and desires, considering
sound budgetary practices.

•

For Township provided facilities, plan, locate, and provide public areas based on a
long- range general plan, short-range project plans, and capital improvements
programming.

•

Assist interested semi-public and citizen groups in their efforts to help implement the
Township Recreation Plan.

•

Maximize the utilization of public buildings for multi-functional land services.

•

Encourage the establishment of a continuous open space system that interconnects
public and private natural areas and recreational facilities, as well as providing for
wildlife habitat.

•

Encourage the inclusion of parks, bicycle and pedestrian linkages and open space
areas in conjunction with new and established developments.

•

Provide access to waterfront by connecting existing facilities to the water.

29 | P a g e

�Summary
The proposals enumerated above for the Township are guidelines for the future
development of the Township. It is essential that these goals, objectives, and strategies be
seriously considered. They will help maintain an orderly, prosperous, and attractive
development pattern in the Township. These statements are suggested as a starting point
for the local officials. As the planning process progresses, the goals, objectives, and strategies
may be altered and new ones formed. Thus, these recommendations are flexible and need
constant attention. It is recommended that the goals, objectives, and strategies be reviewed
and updated as necessary, and adopted on an annual basis.

30 | P a g e

�Future Land Use
The Future Land Use Plan is designed to serve as a guide for future development and use of
property in Elmwood Township. Development of the Plan was based upon analysis of
information collected throughout the planning process including the following:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Existing Land Use Inventory
Existing Zoning Map
Natural Features Inventory
Utility Assessment
Goals and Policies
Existing Township and County Plan Documents

In order to adequately serve the needs of the Township, the Future Land Use Plan must
incorporate several important objectives, which are as follows:
1.

The Plan should encompass an extended but foreseeable time period of
approximately 20 years. The Elmwood Township's Future Land Use Plan depicts land
uses and community development strategies through the Year 2040.

2.

The Plan should be comprehensive. If it is to serve as an important decision-making
tool, the Future Land Use Plan must give adequate consideration to the sensitive
relationship which exists between all major land use categories, environmentally
sensitive properties, socioeconomic characteristics, planning and design
characteristics, goals and policies, and community opinion.

3.

The Plan should be flexible. The Future Land Use Plan may require periodic review
and revisions to reflect changes in local, state, or national conditions which are
unforeseen at this time.
For example, several major innovations in land development have occurred within
the past 40 years which have significantly impacted development patterns. Such
innovations include the initiation and expansion of the freeway system; modifications
in shopping facilities (shopping centers, enclosed malls, “big box” development);
relocation of residents and employment centers from the cities to the suburbs; and
the declining family size.
Since it is impossible to predict the variety of changes which may occur over the next
20 years, the Future Land Use Plan should be analyzed and modified periodically to
reflect changing conditions, especially the extension of centralized sanitary sewer
and water facilities and road improvements.

31 | P a g e

�4.

The Plan must be updated periodically. A comprehensive review of the Future Land
Use Plan should be undertaken approximately every five (5) years to adequately
analyze new conditions and trends. Should a major rezoning be sought which conflict
with the Plan's recommendations, it should be reviewed and amended accordingly to
reflect the current community developmental goals and policies.

The Future Land Use Plan depicts the generalized development pattern for Elmwood
Township into the middle of the 21st century. It is intended to provide the necessary
guidelines for making future land use, community facility, and capital improvement
decisions.
The Future Land Use Plan was prepared with the intention of accommodating the continuing
spillover effects from Traverse City which is essentially built out and has limited land
available for new development. The availability, quality, and distribution of public water,
sewer, and roads is also a major element of the Future Land Use Plan. Another factor, which
aided in the future land use planning process, was the carrying capacity of the land. Those
areas designated as having tillable soils coincides closely with land which is currently being
farmed. These lands are planned to either remain as farmland for agricultural production or
be carefully transitioned into residential or mixed uses. Those soils identified as having
severe building limitations, high water tables, wetlands, etc., are those areas which have been
planned for less intense developments and recreational uses. Finally, expectations of the
community assisted in shaping the Future Land Use Plan for Elmwood Township. The strong,
collective message throughout the development of this Plan was the conservation of the
natural environment and the preservation of Elmwood Township’s image as a rural
community.
This Plan recommends that factors such as clustering and permanently designated open
space, direct access to paved roads, and other measures be used to preserve the Township’s
rural character and to minimize the demand on the Township’s limited public services.
Further, a special emphasis should be placed on the visual character of developments which
will be visible from road rights-of-way and existing land uses.
Development Densities
Development density is used to provide the basis for a zoning program that allows flexibility
in residential development. Development densities are a means of describing the
recommended development intensity within different areas of the Township. References to
“development density” mean the density that results by dividing the total acreage of an area
by the number of dwelling units planned for that area—it does not mean a uniform minimum
lot size.

32 | P a g e

�Recommended development densities are determined by considering a number of location
elements. Most notable in Elmwood Township are the availability of public utilities and
potential traffic impacts. It is the recommendation of this Plan that developments in areas
that are not served with either public water or sanitary sewer system have a density of not
greater than one unit per two and one-half acres. Zoning district regulations should reflect
this policy with higher densities permitted in areas where public utilities are available or
where the developer is planning to extend or install such facilities. The Ordinance should
also provide standards whereby the Planning Commission may offer bonus density
calculations to developments that exhibit exceptional site design in terms of considering the
natural and manmade environment.
Traffic impacts will also affect density determination. In order to better assess potential
traffic problems, the Township should also incorporate into the zoning ordinance standards
identifying when and what type of traffic impact studies should be required as part of the
development review standards. One of the key triggers for identifying when an impact study
should be required is “trip generation.” The trip generation of a proposed development is
basically the number of inbound and outbound vehicle trips that are expected to be
generated by the development during an average day or during a peak hour.
Table 3 lists some of the more common types of developments and the number of trips which
could be expected to be generated by development. Following the Table are recommended
thresholds for trip generation that help identify when a traffic impact study should be
completed.

33 | P a g e

�Table 310
Examples of Trip Generation for Common Land Uses
Land Use

AM Peak hour

Size

PM Peak Hour

IDai liy T rips

Residentiat
S ingle Fami'ly

70

U1nits

52

6,9

661

S ingle Fami'ly

150

1..mns

111

149

1,4 16,

53

64

115

lllnHs

2:45

llnns

125

llnfiS

29,5

U1nits
U1nits
U1nits

Apartmen1s/C-0ndom · i urnsfliov,,
nhouses (ll.!ow Rise: 1-2 floors)
A parbnen1s/C-0ndom · i urnsfliov,,
n:houses (ll.!ow Ri s.e: 1-2 floorn)
Apartmen1s/C-0ndom· i urnsfli011,1
I n houses (Medi urn Rise)
A pm1men1s/Condom i urnsfliov,,
I n houses (Medi um Rii se)
Mbb~e Home Park

842'

113

140

305

137
1,793

45

55

106

130

36

64

1,6 05
7(10,
1,525

680,

19

14!0

Shopp ing Center ,(GFA)

5,2fl0

sqft

5

20

196,

Shlop;ping Center ,(GFA)

15,500

sqft

15

59

585

Fas Food Restaurant wl d rive-in

2,600

sqft

104

85

1,224

Fast Food Restaurant wfd rive-in

5,2.00

sqft

2(19

170

2 ,449

6,5 0

sqft

49

57

Gas Sta on with con,..enien ce·
store ,(GFA}
Banks w/ drive·- in (GFA),

1,300

sqft

99

HS

2,2fl0

sqft

21

45

Banks w/drive-in (GFA),

4 ,400

sqft

42

90

120

f OOlllS

56

n

1,003

250

i oorns

2 ,090,

Mbb~e Home Park

Gas Station with con,..enien ce
stor e ,(GFA}

Hotel

936,
1,872'
220
440,

118

150

Genera l Office

22,000

sqft

26

25

2 14

General Office

55,000

sqft

64

63

536,

Medica'l!Dootal Office

18,600

sqft

64

647

Medica'l!Dootal Office

37,000

sqft

52
1(13

128

1,288,

Hotel

Note: GLA = Gross Leasable Area; GFA = Gross Floor Area
_________________________
Rates/equations used to calculate the thresholds are from Trip Generation, 10
Transportation Engineers.
10

th

Edition, by the Institute of

34 | P a g e

�The following thresholds for requiring a traffic impact study are recommended for most
cases in Elmwood Township11:
•

Any proposed site plan or subdivision plan which would be expected to generate over
one hundred (100) directional trips during the peak hour of the traffic generator or
the peak hour on the adjacent streets, or over seven hundred fifty (750) trips in an
average day. A less detailed study (Traffic Impact Assessment) is recommended for
projects which could generate 50-99 directional trips during a peak hour or 500-749
trips during an average day.

•

Any proposed development along a corridor or segment of a corridor currently or
projected to experience significant congestion or relatively high accident rates which
would be expected to generate over 50 directional trips during the peak hour of the
traffic generator or the adjacent streets, or over 500 trips in an average day.

•

For new phases or changes to a development where a traffic study is more than two
years old and roadway conditions have changed significantly (volumes increasing
more than two percent annually).

•

A change in use or expansion at an existing site where traffic is expected to increase
by at least 50 directional trips in a peak hour.

•

Special land uses, conditional land uses, planned developments, and other uses which
are required to provide a traffic impact study in the zoning ordinance.

Wellhead Protection

As mentioned throughout this Plan, access to public drinking water and sanitary sewer
facilities in the Township is limited. This fact, combined with the amount of land which has
the potential to be developed during the life of this Plan, brings to the forefront the need to
include in this Plan protection measures for private and shared water systems.
It is the intention of this Plan to encourage shared utility systems for all developments
resulting from subdividing, condominium or planned development activity. This is especially
true if the overall density of the development exceeds one unit per acre. Even with a shared
system, however, the risk of environmental hazard is not eliminated.
_____________________
Threshold recommendations found in this section are taken from the publication Evaluating Traffic Impact
Studies, 1994, Michigan Department of Transportation, et. al.
12 National (U.S.) Research Council on Groundwater Quality Protection, National Academy Press, Washington,
DC, 1986.
11

35 | P a g e

�The most significant sources of water supply contamination are landfills, surface
impoundment areas, subsurface percolation from septic tanks and cesspools, open dumps,
injection wells and underground storage tanks.12 These uses represent both point and nonpoint contamination sources. Point source is the term used to describe contaminants which
originate in the immediate area ofthe well or tap. For example, of the above list, surface
impoundments and open dumps are good examples of point source polluters. Contaminants
from these uses may seep directly down through
the soil to the water source. By carefully monitoring land uses at the surface, much of the
potential for point source contamination may be abated.
Non-point source contamination is much more difficult to control because the cause of the
problem may actually be located a considerable distance from the well. This type of
contamination is caused by pollutants (e.g., from a leaking underground tank) filtering into
an underground aquifer and migrating slowly to off-site well and water sources. Prevention
of this type of contamination must involve a collective effort on the part of property owners
and local officials from a large geographic area.
It is the recommendation of this Plan that all existing and future wells be protected from both
point and non-point source contamination to the greatest degree possible. This may be
undertaken through a variety of means, including monitoring wells for land uses with a
potential for wide area contamination; the incorporation of wellhead protection overlays
zones into the local zoning ordinance, and careful permitting of potentially hazardous land
uses, especially in areas of shared wells and highly permeable soils.

_____________________
National (U.S.) Research Council on Groundwater Quality Protection, National Academy Press, Washington,
DC, 1986.
12

36 | P a g e

�PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
Five future land use classifications are proposed for Elmwood Township. A description of
each land use category is presented below.
High Density Residential
A total of 1,612 acres or 13.2 percent of the Township is planned for High Density Residential
land uses. This land use is intended for single-family residential development on the smaller
lots near Lake Leelanau, along M-22, and in the area adjacent to Traverse City, west of
Greilickville with the following objectives:
•

To provide lands in the Township for more urban-type residential lots of less than
one acre in size;

•

To use to public advantage the availability of public sanitary sewer facilities in the
planned development of these parcels;

•

To protect the residential character of areas so designated by excluding incompatible
activities such as, but not limited to, commercial and industrial land uses;

•

To encourage a suitable family environment by permitting appropriate neighborhood
facilities such as places of worship, schools, playgrounds, and open spaces;

•

To permit certain institutions and utilities considered compatible with residential
neighborhoods;

•

To preserve individual privacy and avoid overcrowding by requiring minimum yard
setbacks and by regulating the maximum amount of lot coverage permitted;

•

To provide for access to light and air and for privacy, as far as reasonable, by
controlling the spacing and height of buildings;

•

To protect residential areas from unnecessary traffic to the greatest degree possible;
and,

•

To encourage development within residential areas that is attractive, consistent with
family needs, and conducive to an improved environmental quality.

Most of the planned High Density Residential land in the Township is already developed
according to the recommendations of this plan, however not always with the benefit of public
utilities. This is most notably the case along the coast of Lake Leelanau and along M-22, north
of Crain Hill Road. The majority of additional, vacant area planned for this type of residential
use is located around the city of Traverse City and is served with public sanitary sewer.

37 | P a g e

�The intensity of new High-Density Residential development will be dependent upon the
availability of central utilities as well as the amount of traffic generated. Given a general
density of less than one acre, with potential density of as much as twelve (12) units per acre,
single- family residential areas should be located close to a roadway designated as either a
principal or minor arterial. Multiple family developments should be directed toward areas
where public utilities are available or planned as part of the site design.
The boundaries for the High-Density Residential area are intended to serve as a guide and
specific limits will be dependent on both natural and manmade features. This is especially
true for the properties surrounding the city of Traverse City. As the indicated area infills with
development and public utilities expand to meet demand, the boundaries of High Density
housing will also expand. As the Planning Commission considers this future expansion, they
should also be aware that not all designated areas are suitable for intense development. They
should be observant of the environmentally sensitive conditions in some locations and
encourage developers to creatively protect these areas as part of the site design.
It should be noted that this Plan recognizes the Michigan State Supreme Court holding that
manufactured housing units cannot be excluded from districts in which site-built singlefamily homes are permitted, simply because they are factory built. The Court did
acknowledge, however, that a Township had the right and responsibility to adopt adequate,
reasonable regulations to assure that manufactured units would be compatible with other
site-built housing in the vicinity. Therefore, while the Plan honors the holding of the Court
regarding placement of manufactured housing in all districts in which single-family homes
are allowed, it also recommends that Elmwood Township continue to implement adequate,
reasonable zoning ordinance provisions governing manufactured housing to assure, insofar
as possible, that such housing will meet standards of compatibility.
Medium Density Residential
Approximately 2,211 acres of land, representing 18.1 percent of the Township's area, have
been planned for Medium Density Residential development. Intended uses within this
designation would include:
•
•

single-family detached dwelling units;
various public and semi-public uses, as may be desirable.

The Medium Density Residential land use classification intended to provide locations for
building sites on lots which are greater than one acre. Lands in this classification are
currently developing with homesites on individual or platted lots which are between five
and ten acres. Although allowed, little additional subdividing is expected in areas designated
as Medium Density Residential. The attraction for residents in this area are the large, private
parcels with commanding views of the countryside. Public water and sewer facilities should
be considered in density calculations.

38 | P a g e

�Rural Low Density
Elmwood Township has historically been an agricultural community. A look at the plat map
today reveals a significant number of large parcels, many of which are currently farmed or
have been farmed at one time. As the local economy moves away from farming and young
family members seek opportunities away from the land, an increasing number of property
owners are considering the possibility of releasing their land to development. As certain
areas of the Township move through this transition, large tracts of land will likely be made
available for development. In Elmwood Township, these lands may be found throughout the
entire length of the Township and from Solon Township line to the west to Cherry Bend Road
to the east.
Because of the transitional nature of the properties in this area, the desire of residents to
retain the rural character and the current lack of public water and sanitary sewer facilities,
this future land use classification has been termed Rural Low Density.
The terrain, soils and existing land uses vary greatly throughout this classification of land.
Large tracts of farmed land are found in the relatively flat Sections of 25, 30, 31, and 36.
Wetlands are interspersed with scattered residential lots extending diagonally through
Sections 12, 18, and 20. Steep ravines and farmland are the primary characteristics of
Sections 6 and 7, and Sections 1 and 12 find the ravines leveling somewhat with more farms
and scattered residences on individual lots. Generally, lands in the Rural Low Density
category are either farmed or vacant, and wooded and hilly. The growing attraction of
northern Lower Michigan, both as home and recreation destination, has been frequently
documented. As the Township moves into the next wave of development, it is critical that
any transition of lands be conscientiously planned to protect those natural characteristics
which first attracted residents and visitors to the region. The Rural Low Density section of
this Plan will help identify methods and strategies for the Township to consider when
developing regulations for future land uses.
It is not the intent of this plan to encourage residents away from agriculture or in any way
create difficulty for those who are committed to remain in farming for the foreseeable future.
Developments occurring adjacent to those areas where farming activities are expected to
continue should incorporate appropriate design measures to minimize the impact of
development on land which is being farmed.
Although traditional parcel subdividing is often the instinct for property holders, the
Township should build incentives into the zoning ordinance which will increase the appeal
of the less- traditional clustered and/or mixed-use development.
Clustering is a form of residential subdivision that permits housing units to be grouped on
sites or lots with dimensions, frontages, and setbacks reduced from conventional sizes, with
remaining land dedicated as permanent open space. Clustering permits greater flexibility in
residential design and discourages development sprawl while permitting the owner and
developer the overall density allowed by the underlying zoning district. A condition of the
cluster design approval is that open space may not be further subdivided, and must be
39 | P a g e

�designed and intended for the common use of residents of the development. Preservation
and/or maintenance provisions for the common areas shall be clearly explained and adopted
as part of the project approval.
It is recommended that these planned developments should be primarily residential in
nature, but some mixing of uses, such as outdoor recreational uses, in Planned Developments
(PD) should also be permitted. Recreation areas, sidewalks, neighborhood retail shops, and
natural feature enhancements which are built into the plan help meet the needs of a variety
of lifestyles as well as helping to create a sense of community for residents living in the
developments. Examples of recommended retail uses would include coffee shops,
bookstores, and small grocery stores. Personal service uses may also be intermixed in the
developments. Uses with a large consumer draw and/or which have a large trip generation
rate should be avoided. Non-residential elements should, whenever possible, be designed
into the interior of the development.
Single-family condominium development can also be anticipated within this district. A
condominium is a building or group of buildings in which units are owned individually and
the structure and all the unit owners on a proportional, undivided basis own common areas
and facilities. Such ownership has long been associated with multiple-family developments.
It has recently become more popular for single-family development because the
condominium approval process allows developers to circumvent the platting procedure of
the Land Division Act (formerly the Subdivision Control Act of 1967, as amended (PA 288 of
1967), thereby reducing the length of time required to have a development approved. In
addition, local subdivision control ordinance engineering standards (such as pavement
width or composition) can be relaxed because maintenance obligations can be transferred
from the local governing body to the condominium association.
Large, outdoor recreation facilities may also be considered for properties in the Rural LowDensity classification. Golf courses, riding stables and similar uses enhance the quality life
for residents and visitors to the area while helping preserve the open, rural character of the
community.
Specific permitted development densities will depend on site conditions, availability of
public or shared water and sanitary sewer facilities and the development objectives of the
landowner. As landowners take increased measures to preserve the Township’s open spaces
and rural character and minimize public impacts, greater development densities could be
permitted. Thus, a strong incentive will exist to develop land in a responsible manner as it
relates to preserving the Township’s current character.
Another critical area of concern in this land use classification is the M-72 corridor. The 2013
Township Survey shows that the M-72/Bugai Rd area is an area where some respondents
would like to see commercial development. The Planning Commission should study this area
to determine the type of development that should be allowed in this area. It is anticipated
that this area will provide some sort of form based zoning so that the structures are visually
appealing and not steel structures. The Rural Low Density classification encompasses a total
of 6,656 acres, or 54.4 percent of the Township’s land area.
40 | P a g e

�Greilickville Service Area
Commercial, office and industrial development is an important aspect of the livelihood of any
community, in terms of offering services to residents, providing a reasonable tax base, and
having increased employment opportunities. The Greilickville Service Area in the most
southeast corner of the county has evolved into the commercial and retail center of the
Township, offering a variety of shopping, non-profits, and service-oriented opportunities for
local residents. Lands found in this classification are generally planned for more intense uses
and densities than other locations.
This is due in part to the availability of public water and sanitary sewer facilities, and the
proximity to compatible land uses in the city of Traverse City.
Examples of commercial uses recommended for the Greilickville Area include restaurants,
professional offices, personal services and convenience grocery stores. Industrial uses
should be limited to those which are generally compatible with residential uses or which
under the imposition of certain reasonable conditions may be safely and aesthetically
located in relatively close proximity to residential uses. Residential use recommendations
are similar to those in the High-Density Residential classification, with consideration given
to multiple family developments where both pubic water and sanitary sewer is available.
Commercial uses should be designed consistent with the recommendations of the New
Designs for Growth Development Guidebook. Specifically, the uses in this area should be
encouraged to provide shared access, margin access easements, and screen parking and
loading areas. Building architecture
and signage should be compatible Commercial Development Guidelines
with surrounding uses, including
residential uses.
Future commercial or industrial
rezoning requests which are not in
conformance with the Plan, must be
carefully analyzed in terms of their
..
potential effect on the existing
SPECIES THAT OCC
t,"~, 1N NEARBY WOODS ANO FIELD:
commercially
zoned
and
,,#•.ti---.. • ·
established
properties.
The
indiscriminate
rezoning
of
properties for commercial use will
diminish the integrity of quiet residential neighborhoods as well as hinder the success of
existing commercially zoned properties. The result will be a pattern of commercial
development which does not adequately serve the local and regional populations.
..

\,1,,1.:

41 | P a g e

�Timberlee
The Timberlee resort area encompasses several acres in Sections 12, 13, 18, and 24. This
area has historically been used as a resort area and should be planned for the continued use
as such. This area has developed over the years as a mix of residential and commercial uses.
Not surprisingly, some ventures in this area have proven successful, while others have not.
Currently there are a number of plats, not all developed, and a restaurant operating in the
Timberlee area. Although many lands have been platted, not all have been developed. The
topography and availability of a central water system should make this area desirable for
residential, recreational, and commercial land uses.
To take advantage of the extremes in elevation, the area lends itself naturally to both outdoor
recreation and residential land uses. Non-residential uses, including restaurants, shops and
services geared toward the local market are recommended to support the primary uses.
Site design for commercial establishments should follow the recommendations stated in the
Greilickville Service Area of this Plan and the and New Designs for Growth Development
Guidebook. In addition, non-residential uses should be located toward the center of the
development and all future development should be planned with attention to the natural
features of the area.
Residential densities in Timberlee should vary from very high density (up to twelve units
per acre) in areas served with public water and adequate road visibility to at least one unit
per 2.5 acres in areas without shared utilities or where the roadways wind and curve to
create blind access drives. Because of the unique characteristics and uses, the Planning
Commission should develop a sub-area plan for the Timberlee area.

42 | P a g e

�Zoning Plan
Section 22, (2), (d), of the Michigan Planning Enabling Act (Act 33 of 2008) requires that
Master Plans adopted after September 1, 2008 include a Zoning Plan to explain how the
future land use categories in this Plan relate to the zoning districts incorporated in the
Township’s Zoning Ordinance. The following table relates the more general future land use
categories with the zoning districts and discusses the features and factors to be considered
in reviewing requests to rezone lands in the Township consistent with this Plan.
Future Land Use
District
Greilickville Service Area

High Density Residential

Compatible Zoning
District
General Commercial
Light Industrial
Neighborhood
Commercial
Shoreline Commercial
Municipal Center
Residential 3
Residential 3
Manufactured Home
Park

Medium Density
Residential

Residential 2

Rural Low Density

Residential 1
Agricultural-Rural

Timberlee

Rural Resort
Residential 1
Residential 3

Evaluation Factors
The Greilickville Service Area is
intended to provide commercial needs
and high density needs for the
community. This area generally has
public water and sewer available.
The High Density Residential district
provides for multiple family dwelling
and higher densities with smaller lots.
Generally, in areas where public water
and sewer are available or along
waterfront.
The Medium Density Residential
district allows for single family and
two-family dwellings on larger lots.
These areas typically do not have
public water and sewer.
The Rural Low Density areas are where
large lot developments or farming
occurs.
Timberlee area is located near
Timberlee Recreation Area and may
have public water. There is a mix of
single-family dwellings and
townhomes.

43 | P a g e

�Plan Implementation Resources
The Elmwood Township Master Plan is a comprehensive community policy statement. The
Plan is comprised of a variety of both graphic and narrative policies intended to function as
benchmarks and to provide basic guidelines for making reasonable, realistic community
development decisions. The Plan is intended to be used by Township officials, by those
making private sector investments, and by all of those Elmwood Township citizens
interested in the future development of the Township.
The completion of the Plan is but one part of the community planning process. Realization
or implementation of the recommendations of the Plan can only be achieved over an
extended period of time and only through the cooperative efforts of both the public and
private sectors. Implementation of the Plan may be realized by actively:
•

assuring community-wide knowledge, understanding, support, and approval of the
Plan;

•

regulating the use and manner of development of property through up-to-date and
reasonable zoning controls, subdivision regulations, and building and housing codes;

•

providing a program of capital improvements and adequate, economical public
services by using available governmental financing techniques to encourage desired
land development or redevelopment; and,

•

developing design guidelines to implement attractive development within the
Township.

Public Support of the Long-Range Plan
Citizen participation and understanding of the general planning process and policies of the
Plan are critical to the success of the Township's planning program. A well-organized public
relations program is needed to identify and marshal public support. Lack of citizen
understanding and support could have serious implications for the eventual implementation
of planning proposals. Failure of the public to back needed bond issues and continuing
dissatisfaction concerning taxation, special assessments, zoning decisions, and development
proposals are some of the results of public misunderstanding and rejection of long-range
plans.
The validity of the Plan, as well as the right of the Planning Commission to review various
development proposals to assure their compatibility with the Township's expressed policies,
requires that the Plan be officially adopted by the Commission.

44 | P a g e

�Land Development Codes
Zoning Ordinance
Zoning regulations are adopted under the power granted from the State in the Michigan
Zoning Enabling Act for the purpose of promoting community health, safety, and general
welfare. Such regulations have been strongly supported by the Michigan courts, as well as by
the U.S. Supreme Court. Zoning consists of dividing the community into districts, for the
purpose of establishing density of population and regulating the use of land and buildings,
their height and bulk, and the proportion of a lot that may be occupied by them. Regulations
in different kinds of districts may be different. However, regulations within the same district
must be consistent throughout the community.
The intent of zoning is to assure the orderly development of the community. Zoning is also
employed as a means of protecting property values and other public and private
investments. Because of the impact which zoning can have on the use of land and related
services, it should be based on a comprehensive long-range community plan.
Zoning is an effective tool not only for the implementation of the Plan, but also benefits
individual property owners. It protects homes and investments against the potential harmful
intrusion of business and industry into residential neighborhoods; requires the spacing of
buildings far enough apart to assure adequate light and air; prevents the overcrowding of
land; facilitates the economical provision of essential public facilities; and aids in
conservation of essential natural resources.
A stable, knowledgeable Planning Commission is critical to the success of the zoning process.
The Commission's responsibilities include long-range plan formulation and the drafting of
appropriate, reasonable zoning ordinance regulations designed to implement Plan goals and
objectives. Adoption of the zoning ordinance by the legislative body then provides the legal
basis for enforcement of zoning ordinance provisions. The ultimate effectiveness of the
various ordinance requirements, however, is dependent upon the overall quality of
ordinance administration and enforcement. If administrative procedures are lax, or if
enforcement of regulations is handled in an inconsistent, sporadic manner, the result will be
unsatisfactory at best.
There are a variety of zoning approaches and techniques which may be employed to help
assure that Elmwood Township remains an attractive community in which to live and
conduct business. These techniques acknowledge the critical role of both Township officials
and staff in enforcing the provisions of the local zoning ordinance. Two key tools available to
Township officials seeking to assure quality development are special approval use
procedures and performance guarantee provisions.

45 | P a g e

�Some land uses are of such a nature that permission to locate them in a given district should
not be granted outright but should only be approved after assurances that the use will meet
certain specified conditions. These types of land uses are called special approval, conditional,
or special exception uses. The Township currently uses this flexible zoning process to permit
uses of land by following special procedures, including a public hearing and site plan review,
to ensure the compatibility of the use within the vicinity in which it is to be located. This
technique is based upon discretionary review and approval of special land uses. The site
development requirements and standards upon which these decisions are made are
specified in the ordinance as required by state law. However, additional reasonable
conditions may be attached in conjunction with the approval of a special land use including
provisions to conserve natural resources and measures designed to promote the use of land
in an environmentally, socially, and economically desirable manner.
To ensure compliance with a zoning ordinance and any conditions imposed under the
ordinance, a community may require that a performance guarantee, cash deposit, certified
check, irrevocable bank letter of credit, or surety bond, acceptable to the Township and
covering the estimated cost of improvements on the parcel for which site plan approval is
sought, be deposited with the Clerk. This performance guarantee protects the Township by
assuring the faithful completion of the improvements. The community must establish
procedures under which rebate of cash deposits will be made, in reasonable proportion to
the ratio of work completed on the required improvements, as work progresses.
Subdivision Regulations
When a developer proposes to subdivide land, he or she is, in effect, planning a portion of the
Township. To assure that such a development is in harmony with Plan objectives, the
subdivision or re-subdivision of residential or nonresidential land must be guided by the
Township in accordance with the Land Division Act (formerly the Michigan Subdivision
Control Act, Act 288, P.A. 1967, as amended).
Several direct benefits accrue from the regulation of subdivisions by a local unit of
government. By requiring the developer to install adequate utilities and improved streets,
purchasers of the lots are not later burdened with unexpected added expenses. A subdivision
without adequate physical improvements is detrimental not only to itself, but it also reduces
the opportunity for reasonable development of adjacent parcels. In addition, long-range
economy in government can be realized only when adequate improvements are provided by
the subdivider.
As a part of its review of proposed subdivisions, the Planning Commission focuses on such
features as the arrangement and width of streets; the grading and surfacing of streets; the
width and depth of lots; the adequate provision of open space; and the location of easements
for utility installations. The subdivision review process is one of the methods of
implementing the goals and policies of the community's long-range Plan.

46 | P a g e

�Capital Improvement Program
Elmwood Township created a Capital Improvement Plan in 2017 that will be reviewed and
updated annually. The Plan includes anything that is anticipated to cost more than $10,000
and lasts longer than one year. This includes any land acquisitions, new vehicles, new
structures, and infrastructure. Few communities are fortunate enough to have available at
any given time sufficient revenues to satisfy all demands for new or improved public facilities
and services. Consequently, most are faced with the necessity of determining the relative
priority of specific projects and establishing a program schedule for their initiation and
completion. The orderly programming of public improvements is to be accomplished in
conjunction with the long-range Plan for development.
In essence, the Capital Improvements Program is simply a schedule for implementing public
capital improvements, which acknowledges current and anticipated demands and which
recognizes present and potential financial resources available to the community. The Capital
Improvements Program is a major planning tool for assuring that they proceed to completion
in an efficient manner. The Capital Improvements Program is not intended to encourage the
spending of additional public monies but is simply a means by which an impartial evaluation
of needs may be made. The program is a schedule established to expedite the
implementation of authorized or contemplated projects.
Long-range programming of public improvements is based upon three fundamental
considerations. First, the proposed projects must be selected on the basis of community
need. Second, the program must be developed within the community's financial constraints
and must be based upon a sound financial plan. Finally, program flexibility must be
maintained through the annual review and approval of the capital budget. The strict
observance of these conditions requires periodic analysis of various community
development factors, as well as a thorough and continuing evaluation of all proposed
improvements and related expenditures. It is essential that, in the process of preparing and
developing the program, the Planning Commission be assigned a role in reviewing project
proposals to assure conformity with the Elmwood Township Master Plan and to make
recommendations regarding priority projects and appropriate methods of financing.
Governmental Assistance
Many sources of governmental assistance are available to aid local officials and private
interests in meeting desired land use objectives or improvement needs.
Local government must also be cognizant of enhancing the financial feasibility of private
development projects through "co-development." Co-development is simply the joint public
and private investment for a common purpose.
The participation can range from direct loans to private interests to reduce the capital
needed to develop a project, selling publicly controlled land at less than fair market value to
lower construction costs, or by issuing bonds to acquire land, construct buildings, or acquire
equipment which the Township would sell or lease to private industry.
47 | P a g e

�Design Guidelines
Elmwood Township is experiencing a transition from an agriculturally based community to
a suburban community. The accompanying population growth often occurs with only a
limited regard to preservation of environmental and scenic amenities.
The Plan can only assure what type of development occurs, not what the quality of the
development will be. Design guidelines are a way of helping to ensure the Plan's intent to
create attractive development within Elmwood Township.

48 | P a g e

�Appendix A-Maps

49 | P a g e

�t

NORTH

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF ELMWOOD
FUTURE LAND USE MAP
1111 GREILICKVILLE SERVICE CENTER
MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL L_J TIMBER LEE
HIGH DENSITY RESIDENTIAL
1111 RURAL LOW DENSITY
TRAVERSE CITY
-

TartTrait

Date: 416120 16

50 | P a g e

�0

•

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF ELMWOOD

1111 Loamy Sand 1111 Sand Muck 1111 Silty Clay Loam
1111 Sandy Loam [=:J Water
Gravelly Sandy Loam [=:J Muck
1111 Silt Loam
1111 Loam
1111 Sand
Elmwood Soils

N

A
51 | P a g e

�akeview Hills

&lt;ii

-1!:

"'

0..

QJ

Fouch

Hoxie
OJ

::,
CD

Lo g ra ch
Harrys

M 2

t

NORTH

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF ELMWOOD
Public Water System

Date : 4/17/20 17

52 | P a g e

�t

NORTH

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF ELMWOOD
Public Sewer Map

Date: 4/17/2017

53 | P a g e

�erse

27

CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF ELMWOOD

Zoning Districts

Manufactured Home PBJi { MHP) -

GeneralCommerciel { GC)

Rural Resort { RR)

-

Light Industrial (LI)

Residential 2 { R-2)

Munici?BI Center (MC)

-

Shoreline Commercial ( SC)

Residential 3 { R-3)

Neighbolhood Commercial ( NC ) -

-

~ricultural- Rural {A-R)

-

Residential 1 { R-1 )

-

-

Travase City

~

Conditional Rezoning

Offic ial Zoning Map

A

September 1, 2017

54 | P a g e

�DISTRICT WIDE INITIATIVES
1

ESTABLISH COMMUNITY PUBLIC SPACES
ACTIVITY,SUPPORTTHE
RRIDOR,ANOCREATEA

, CREATELINKSTOAOJACENTPROPERHESTHATPROMOTESPUBLIC
ACCESS ANO PEDESTRIAN SAFETY.
· INSTALL FISHING PIER ALONG EXISTING ARMOR STONE REVETMENT

2

CEOA R LA KE

ESTABLI SHAMIXAND DENSITYOF LAND USES

;·······-._.......... ...1

, OEVEtOPLANOUSESTHATSUPPORTEACHOTHERANDFIT THE

\
. ..

p
; ( l b~ l l A~ ,
: IOl ' LA U\ 0

TD

;

, : E CHE RRY BEND ROA D

3

2

,

DISTRICT PARKING STRATEGIES
, DEVHOPSHAREDPARKINGRESOURCES

, UTIUZEPEAK·SEASONSHUTTLE/JITNEYSERVtCE
, LOCATE PARKING IN REAR OF FUTURE DEVELOPMENT

4

DISTRICT CONNECTIVITY
, EN HANCE
EXISTING

, INCREAS

TRAILAL

, PROVIDE
PROPERTY

5

ENVIRONMENTAL
STRICT TO CREATE AN
REEKFROMTARTTRAIL TO BAY
J'S NATURAL RE.SOURCES AS

ELMWOO D

TO WNI HI P

LEGEND
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT

IT]

PARKING
GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE
DEVELOPMENT
OPPORTUNITY
EXISTING ROAD
PROPOSED ROAD
EXISTING TRAIL
PROPOSED TRAIL
EXISTING WATERWAY
PARCEL LINES

EB

EL MWOOD TOWNS HIP
MIC HI GAN
F,guie 6
Augult 20, 201 l

Greil1ckville Co111merc1al Corridor Sub-Area Master Plan

-~~lllllllllij

LAND USE PLAN

SMITHGROUPJJR

55 | P a g e

�Appendix B-Demographics
Socioeconomic Profile
This chapter examines the characteristics of the Elmwood Township’s population and
housing stock, identifies historical patterns, and determines future trends of the Township.
The data described in this chapter is benchmarked to county and state.
Population
Data in Table 4 indicates the decennial population count of Elmwood Township, its
surrounding townships, Leelanau County, and the State of Michigan. This data reflects the
numeric and percentage change in population of the communities listed below.

56 | P a g e

�Population by Jurisdiction
Table 4

Place

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

2015
Projection

Elmwood Township

2,240

3,004

3,427

4,264

4,503

4,566

Bingham Township

916

1,546

2,051

2,425

2,497

2,530

Centerville Township

473

709

836

1,095

1,274

1,288

Cleveland Township

393

654

783

1,040

1,031

1,046

Empire Township

547

457

503

707

807

Empire Village

409

340

355

378

375

Glen Arbor Township

571

578

644

788

859

871

Kasson Township

676

952

1,135

1,577

1,609

1,628

Leelanau Township

1,270

1,560

1,694

2,139

2,027

2,052

Leland Township

1,219

1,446

1,642

2,033

2,043

2,068

Solon Township

798

987

1,268

1,542

1,509

Suttons Bay Township

838

1,270

1,589

2,393

2,363

Suttons Bay Village

522

504

561

589

618

Traverse City in Leelanau County

n/a

n/a

39

149

192

Traverse City

18,048

15,516

15,155

14,532

14,674

Leelanau County Population

10,872

14,007

16,527

21,119

21,708

21,981

8,881,826

9,262,078

9,295,297

9,938,444

9,883,640

9,922,576

Michigan Population

57 | P a g e

�Percent Population Change by Jurisdiction
Table 5

1970-1980

1980-1990

1990-2000
Percen
Number
t
Change Change
837 24.4%
374 18.2%
259 31.0%
257 32.8%

Number
Change
764
630
236
261

Percent
Change
34.1%
68.8%
49.9%
66.4%

Number
Change
423
505
127
129

Percent
Change
14.1%
32.7%
17.9%
19.7%

Empire Township

-90

-16.5%

46

10.1%

204

Empire Village
Glen Arbor Township
Kasson Township
Leelanau Township
Leland Township

-69
7
276
290
227

-16.9%
1.2%
40.8%
22.8%
18.6%

15
66
183
134
196

4.4%
11.4%
19.2%
8.6%
13.6%

Solon Township

189

23.7%

281

Suttons Bay Township

432

51.6%

Suttons Bay Village
Traverse City in Leelanau
County

-18

Elmwood Township
Bingham Township
Centerville Township
Cleveland Township

Traverse City
Leelanau County
Population
Michigan Population

2000-2010

2010-2015

Number
Change
239
72
179
-9

Percent
Change
5.6%
3.0%
16.3%
-0.9%

Number
Change
63
33
14
15

40.6%

100

14.1%

Not Avail

23
144
442
445
391

6.5%
22.4%
38.9%
26.3%
23.8%

-3
71
32
-112
10

-0.8%
9.0%
2.0%
-5.2%
0.5%

Not Avail
12
19
25
25

28.5%

274

21.6%

-33

-2.1%

Not Avail

319

25.1%

804

50.6%

-30

-1.3%

Not Avail

-3.4%

57

11.3%

28

29

4.9%

Not Avail

n/a

n/a

n/a

n/a

110

5.0%
282.1
%

43

28.9%

Not Avail

-2,532

-14.0%

-361

-2.3%

-623

-4.1%

142

1.0%

Not Avail

Percent
Change
1.4%
1.3%
1.1%
1.5%
Not
Avail
Not
Avail
1.4%
1.2%
1.2%
1.2%
Not
Avail
Not
Avail
Not
Avail
Not
Avail
Not
Avail

3,135
380,252

28.8%
4.3%

2520
33219

18.0%
0.4%

4592
643147

27.8%
6.9%

589
54804

2.8%
-0.6%

273
38,936

1.3%
0.4%

Source: 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000, &amp; 2010 Census, Estimate from US Census Bureau, Population Division; Annual Estimates of the
Resident Population
58 | P a g e

�Over the last 40 years, all of the townships in Leelanau County, with the exception of Empire
Township, experienced significant increases in population until the 2000-2010 decade when
the increase in population slowed greatly and even declined in some Townships. Between
1990 and 2000, Townships were experiencing 20-30% growth. During 2000 to 2010 growth
was 5% with the State seeing a decrease in population. This is the result of the 2007-2008
financial crisis which greatly impacted development nationally.
The largest increases in population occurred within Townships that are connected to
Traverse City by M-22 and M-72. The close proximity of Bingham Township, Elmwood
Township, and Suttons Bay Township to Traverse City has likely influenced this population
growth. Elmwood Township, which is directly north of Traverse City, has the largest number
of residents of any township in the County, followed by Bingham Township, Suttons Bay
Township, Leelanau Township, and Leland Township.

Leelanau County Population
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

2015 Projection

59 | P a g e

�Michigan Population
10,200,000
10,000,000
9,800,000
9,600,000
9,400,000
9,200,000
9,000,000
8,800,000
8,600,000
8,400,000
8,200,000

/

/

/

/

~

1970

1980

1990

2000

2010

2015 Projection

The County’s population doubled between 1970 and 2010 with a total population of 21,981
in 2010. The State’s population only increased by 11% over the same period. The County
has seen a larger population growth than the State in every decade except the 1980s when
the population change was 18% for the County and 40% for the State.

Elmwood Township Population by
Age Group
1,600

-

1,400

0-4

1,200

5-19

1,000

20-44

800
600

45-64

400

.......... 65-74

200

........ 75+

0
1980

1990

2000

2010

60 | P a g e

�Age-life Cycle
The previous graph describes the age distribution of Township residents. For the purpose of
analysis, age levels are categorized according to life-cycle stages. In this analysis, six lifecycles are defined:
•
•
•
•
•
•

Preschool (Less than 5 years)
School (5 to 19 years)
Family Formation (20 to 44 years)
Empty Nest (45 to 64 years)
Senior (65 to 74 years)
Elderly (75 years or more)

According to the 2010 Census, the largest age group in Elmwood Township is the empty
nesters (45-65 years old) followed by the family formation (20-44 years old) age group. The
empty nester represents 33% of the population, while family formation represents 23% of
the population and is decreasing over the years. In 2000, the family formation age group was
31% of the population. All age groups over 45, have increased dramatically since 2000 with
the younger age groups decreasing.
In general, the patterns of the age-life cycle in Elmwood Township is consistent with the State
and National trends. People are living longer and the baby boomers, the largest demographic
cohort in recent years, are getting older. Currently, Elmwood Township has the greatest
percentage of individuals over 70 in the State for its population. Elmwood Township is
located close to medical facilities and Traverse City, offering great location for the older
population in retire.

61 | P a g e

�Housing
Housing Characteristics
Elmwood Township

1990

2000

2010

Total Housing Units

1518

1914

2205

Total Occupied Housing
Units
Owner Occupied
Renter Occupied

1288
1046
242

1697
1484
213

1902
1591
311

230
10
12

217
14
9

303
32
66

182
26

163
31

161
44

Vacant Housing
For rent
For Sale
For seasonal, recreational,
or occasional use
Other vacant
Source: 1990, 2000, &amp; 2010 Census

Between 1990 and 2010, the number of housing units in Elmwood Township has increased
by 45% or 687 housing units, with the 1990s seeing a larger increase than 2000s. Of the
total housing units, over 85% are occupied. Vacant housing makes up about 15% of the
housing units.
These numbers are consistent with the State of Michigan housing
characteristics. In 2010, there were 4,532,233 housing units in Michigan. Of those,
3,872,508, or 85% were occupied and 659,725, or 15% were vacant. A differing
characteristic between Elmwood Township and the State is the owner-occupied units. In
2010, 84% of the housing units in Elmwood Township were owner occupied while only 72%
of the housing units in the State were owner-occupied.

62 | P a g e

�Appendix C- Other Documents
In addition to documents previously mentioned throughout this plan, the following
documents, as amended from time to time, are incorporate by reference.
July 2016 M-22/Greilickville Commercial Corridor Traffic Study
2013 Greilickville Sub Area Master Plan
Community Park, Recreation, Open Space, &amp; Greenways Plan
2013 Community Perception Survey
Waterfront District Master Plan

63 | P a g e

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008066">
                <text>Elmwood-Twp_Master-Plan_2018</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008067">
                <text>Planning Commission, Elmwood Township, Leelanau County, Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008068">
                <text>2018-03-20</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008069">
                <text>Elmwood Township Master Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008070">
                <text>The Elmwood Township Master Plan was prepared by the Planning Commission and was adopted on March 18, 2018. </text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008071">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008072">
                <text>Elmwood Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008073">
                <text>Leelanau County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008074">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008076">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008077">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008078">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008079">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038310">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54684" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58955">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/b0b9ee12ff387cde2d31c329c4d0ee69.pdf</src>
        <authentication>982efd6a57d5401194a22b17957831d6</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008065">
                    <text>l
I_

CITY OF
EATON RAPIDS, MICHIGAN
I
l

COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

1990 - 2010

:
:

\

~--=1-..,,.,-c.o

~

8~1~residern01 c~~~pids

�COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

CITY OF EATON RAPIDS, MICHIGAN

ADOPTED BY EATON RAPIDS PLANNING COMMISSION
DECEMBER 4, 1989

GOVE ASSOCIATES INC.
1601 Portage Street
Kalamazoo, Michigan 49001

�EATON RAPIDS PLANNING PARTICIPANTS

Planning Commission
Gary Wichman, Chairman
John Schultz, Vice-Chairman
Pat Hastay
Valorie Kunkel
Clifford Dye
John Dzwiatowski
Wayne Miller
Gerald Kopack
William Vette
Alys Hoover, Secretary

City Council
Larry Holley, Mayor
Jo Hoffman
Bruce U'ren
Jean Kline
Claudia Brown

City Administration
Marietta White
Neal Hart
Howard Hillard
Michael Seeley
Richard Freer
June James
Robert Zona
David Boes
Richard Monroe

Clerk/Treasurer
Building Inspector/Assessor
Public Works Superintendent
Police Chief
Fire Chief
Librarian
Ass't. Public Works Superintendent
Wastewater Plant Superintendent
Development Director

�TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I
EXISTII-li DEVELOPMENT

SECTION I - INTRODUCTION------------------------------

1

SECTION II - DESCRIPTION OF PLANNI~ AREA
I

•

Location------------------------------------------

3

SECTION III - POPULATION
Introduction-------------------------------------Age/Sex Characteristics--------------------------Household/Family Composition---------------------Education/Occupation -----------------------------Population Projections---------------------------Synopsis ------------------------------------------

5
7

11

14
16
19

SECTION IV - HOUSING
Housing Characteristics--------------------------Synopsis------------------------------------------

20
28

SECTION V - ECONOMY
Introduction-------------------------------------Regional Economy---------------------------------Local Economy------------------------------------State Equalized Valuation------------------------Synopsis------------------------------------------

30
30
37
49
53

SECTION VI - EXISTI~ LAND USE AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Introduction-------------------------------------Natural Resources--------------------------------Land use Classifications-------------------------Analysis of Land Use Patterns--------------------Residential--------------------------------------Commercial---------------------------------------Synopsis------------------------------------------

54
54
60
62
65
67
71

�SECTION VII - STREETS AND ROADS ANALYSIS
Existing Conditions------------------------------Road Classifications-----------------------------Daily Traffic Volumes----------------------------Sidewalks, Curb and Gutter-----------------------Alternative Transportation Methods---------------Problem Areas------------------------------------Synopsis------------------------------------------

73
73
75
75
78
78
81

SECTION VIII - COMMUNITY FACILITIES/SERVICES
Municipal Administration-------------------------Public Safety------------------------------------Parks and Recreation Areas-----------------------Schools ------------------------------------------Library------------------------------------------Social Services----------------------------------Medical Services---------------------------------Solid Waste Disposal-----------------------------Cemetery -----------------------------------------Sewer/Water/Storm Sewer and Public Utilities-----Energy Conservation------------------------------Synopsis ------------------------------------------

85
85

87
88
90
90
90
91
91
91
92
92

'/

�TABLE OF CONTENTS
PART II
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

I

•

SECTION I - INTRODUCTION------------------------------

94

SECTION II - OVERALL LAND USE-------------------------

95

Incremental Development Patterns------------------

98

SECTION III - RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

Goal---------------------------------------------Land Use-----------------------------------------Qualitative Description--------------------------Implementation-----------------------------------Financing Program for Residential Development-----

106
106
108
109
111

SECTION IV - COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT

Goal---------------------------------------------Land Use-----------------------------------------Qualitative Description--------------------------Implementation-----------------------------------Financing Program for Commerical Development-----SECTION V -

113
113
114
115
119

INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

Goal---------------------------------------------Land Use-----------------------------------------Qualitative Description--------------------------Implementation-----------------------------------Financing Program for Industrial Development------

122
122
123
123
125

SECTION VI - SENSE OF COMMUNITY

Goal---------------------------------------------Land Use-----------------------------------------Qualitative Description--------------------------Implementation-----------------------------------Financing Program for Sense of Community----------

126
127
127
128
129

�SECTION VII - PARKS AND RECREATION

Goal---------------------------------------------Land Use-----------------------------------------Qualitative Description--------------------------Implementation-----------------------------------Financing Program for Parks and Recreation--------

130
131
131
132
133

SECTION VIII - TRANSPORTATION

Goal---------------------------------------------Land Use-----------------------------------------Qualitative Description--------------------------Implementation-----------------------------------Financing Program for Transportation--------------

134
135
138
139
140

SECTION IX - PUBLIC FACILITIES, SCHOOLS AND SERVICES
Goal---------------------------------------------Land Use-----------------------------------------Qualitative Description--------------------------Implementation-----------------------------------Financing Program for Public Facilities, Schools
and Services---------------------------------

141
142
145
146
147

SECTION X - COMMUNITY HEALTH AND SAFETY

Goal---------------------------------------------Land Use-----------------------------------------Qualitative Description--------------------------Implementation-----------------------------------Financing Program for Community Health and Safety -

149
150
150
151
153

SECTION XI - NATURAL RESOURCES, ENERGY CONSERVATION
Goal---------------------------------------------Land Use-----------------------------------------Qualitative Description--------------------------Implementation-----------------------------------Financing Program for Natural Resources, Energy
Conservation---------------------------------

155
157
157
157
158

IMPLEMENTATION

Development Priorities---------------------------Implementation Schedule---------------------------

159
162

CONCLUSION--------------------------------------------

165

�LIST OF TABLES
PART I
TABLE
1
2
3
4

5
6

i -

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32

EATON RAPIDS AGE/SEX CHARACTERISTICS----------EATON RAPIDS AND HAMLIN TOWNSHIPS AGE/SEX
COMPOSITION-----------------------------------CITY OF EATON RAPIDS, EATON RAPIDS AND HAMLIN
TOWNSHIPS AGE/SEX COMPOSITION-----------------YEARS OF SCHOOL COMPLETED 18 YEARS OLD AND
OVER - 1980 -----------------------------------EMPLOYMENT BY OCCUPATION - 1980 - PERSONS 16
YEARS AND OLDER-------------------------------POPULATION PROJECTIONS------------------------PLANNING AREA HOUSING UNITS-------------------HOUSING BUILT PRIOR TO 1940 (1987) ------------MEDIAN OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSING VALUE-----------MEDIAN CONTRACT RENTS-------------------------UNITS LACKING SOME OR ALL PLUMBING: 1970, 1980 EATON RAPIDS HOUSING QUALITY------------------EMPLOYMENT PROFILE BY INDUSTRY - TRI-COUNTY
REGION----------------------------------------PER CAPITA AND HOUSEHOLD INCOME - TRI-COUNTY
REGION----------------------------------------VALUE ADDED BY MANUFACTURING------------------CAPITAL EXPENDITURES IN MANUFACTURING FOR
LANSING MSA AND EATON COUNTY------------------RETAIL SALES----------------------------------PERSONAL INCOME - 1979-1984 -------------------EMPLOYMENT BY INDUSTRY - 1980 -----------------TRI-COUNTY PROJECTED POPULATION, INCOME AND
EMPLOYMENT------------------------------------MEDIAN FAMILY INCOMES - 1970-1980 -------------MEDIAN FAMILY INCOMES - COMPARABLE CITIES-----RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS AND SALES - CITY OF
EATON RAPIDS - 1963 - 1982 --------------------VOLUME OF SALES - STATEWIDE RANKING FOR PLACES
OF 2,500 OR MORE------------------------------EATON RAPIDS REAL PROPERTY - STATE EQUALIZED
VALUES----------------------------------------TAX LEVY - CITIES OF COMPARABLE SIZE 1978/1987 CITY TAX LEVIES - 1978/1987--------------------SOILS IN EATON RAPIDS AND THEIR LIMITATIONS---EXISTING LAND USE 1967, 1987 ------------------VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ON MAJOR STREETS------------PARK AND RECREATION AREAS---------------------EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES-------------------------

8
10
12
14
15
19
22
24
25
25
26
28
32
33
34
35
35
36
39
40
41
42
47
48
50
52
51
55
63
77
87
88

PART II

33
34
35

FUTURE LAND USE ALLOCATIONS-------------------SCHEDULED PHASES OF DEVELOPMENT---------------IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE------------------------

97
160
163

�LIST OF MAPS
PART I

MAP
LOCATION, CITY OF EATON RAPIDS------------------STRUCTURAL QUALITY SURVEY - 1967 ----------------STRUCTURAL QUALITY SURVEY - 1987 ----------------RETAIL MARKET AREA - EATON RAPIDS---------------EATON RAPIDS POSTAL ZIP CODE AREA---------------100 YEAR FLOOD AREA, CITY OF EATON RAPIDS-------EXISTING LAND USE-------------------------------RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS - CITY OF EATON RAPIDS STREET CLASSIFICATIONS--------------------------TRAFFIC COUNTS (YEAR) ---------------------------EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER------------------------EXISTING SIDEWALKS------------------------------DOWNTOWN PUBLIC PARKING LOTS--------------------IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED - LOCAL/MAJOR STREETS-------COMMUNITY FACILITIES----------------------------EATON RAPIDS PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT--------------

1
2

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

10
11

12
13
14
15
16

4
23
29
44
45
57
64
66
74
76
79
80
82
83
86
89

PART I I

MAP
17

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN - CITY OF EATON RAPIDS 20-YEAR INCREMENT--------------------------------

105

17a
17b
17c

5-YEAR INCREMENT-------------------------------10-YEAR INCREMENT-------------------------------15-YEAR INCREMENT--------------------------------

102
103
104

18
19

FUTURE STREET PLAN------------------------------DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES---------------------------

137
161

LIST OF FIGURES
PART I

FIGURE
1
2

POPULATION GROWTH, EATON RAPIDS AND VICINITY---POPULATION PROPORTIONS OF PARENT AREAS EATON RAPIDS AND VICINITY-----------------------

6

7

�APPENDICES

' .
l

APPENDIX A - Procedure for Land Use Survey--------

166

APPENDIX B - Community Opinion Survey

City of Eaton Rapids----------------Eaton Rapids Township---------------Hamlin Township----------------------

168
176
184

APPENDIX C - Survey Results-----------------------

192

�.-....:.;

\ :
:I .

',_.

PART I
EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ·

1
\

' --

i
I

.

�' .• J

I

•

i

i1 •'

i
i .....

SECTION I
INTRODUCTION

�INTRODUCTION

i •

1 :

,,,.--......

:~

I •

1 ·:

This Comprehensive Development Plan for the City of Eaton
Rapids, Michigan, is an update of the City's original plan
which was adopted in 1969.
While many of the City's physical
characteristics remain much the same today as they did in
1969, and the number of people living in Eaton Rapids has not
increased to any noticeable extent, change has nonetheless
occurred, and will continue to occur. Much of that change is
manifested in ways of doing business, new technologies and
changing social values.
New retail marketing techniques
that focus on specialty items, increased reliance on telecommunications technology, home videos, increased popularity of
jogging and walking and increased use of the automobile are
examples of the changes that have occurred since 1969 that
impact upon the needs and character is tics of the City.
To
effectively keep pace with, and accommodate, these changes,
the City needs to consistently review and change, as necessary, its physical, social and economic structure.
At the
same time, it is important to recognize the cultural and
architectural heritage of the City and retain that heritage
in future development.
This will ensure a community that is
both vibrant and culturally attractive.
Hence, the reason
for updating the original plan.
To continue to meet the
needs of its residents and to remain competitive as an
attractive and accommodating place to live and to conduct
business, Eaton Rapids must consistently be looking to, and
preparing for, the future while at the same time retaining
those elements of the community that make it unique and
distinctive.
This Plan is the primary means of facilitating
these responsibilities.
The following describes the
that this text addresses:

elements of

community planning

What is Community Planning?
i .

Community planning is planning by municipal government.
It
is concerned with the solving of existing physical, social and
economic problems in the community.
It also guides future
community growth and development.
Community planning operates under the general objectives established by State legislation.
It is also controlled by the voters of the community
through their elected officials.
In putting into effect the
recommendations of the Planning Commission, the governing
body has the final authority.
The Planning Commission only
recommends, but does so on the basis of facts and their analyses.
The governing body has the authority to act on land
acquisition, bond issues, and the effectuation of the public
works program recommended by the Planning Commission.
It
also has final authority on zoning and other legislation to
regulate land uses and population densities.
This is the
legal and administrative framework of community planning.
-1-

�I

l
I

I

What Can Community Planning Accomplish?
The most important function of community planning is to coordinate the various physical elements that make up the community.
Its aim is to achieve optimum compatibility and
efficiency between these elements.
Community planning can
prevent duplication of effort among the various departments
of government and avoid competition for land and funds. Even
more importantly, community planning can influence the stabilization, conservation and improvement of private property
and natural resources.
In general, it aids in furthering the
welfare of the people.
What is the Comprehensive Development Plan?
The Comprehensive Development Plan is a product of the
planning process. Through text, maps and other graphic aids,
it explains the philosophy and desires of a community towards
the future.
Each community must be viewed as a unique area
because of the variety of factors that influence its growth.
The Comprehensive Development Plan seeks to express an ideal,
yet achieveable community in terms of existing conditions,
growth potential and accepted planning concepts and standards.
At the same time, the Plan is flexible enough so that
changing future conditions in such areas as technology and
demands for services can be met by the community. To be most
effective, the Comprehensive Development Plan must obtain the
joint participation of citizens and public officials in the
orderly development of the community.
This Plan differs from the City's original comprehensive plan
in two major areas.
It includes a community attitude survey
that identifies residents' concerns and ideas regarding physical, economic and administrative elements associated with
Eaton Rapids.
It also incorporates data and analysis of the
two surrounding townships - Eaton Rapids and Hamlin - in the
realization that the activities and programs that occur in
Eaton Rapids impact the surrounding areas and vice-versa.
In
essence, this Plan is of areawide scope and is designed to
address future development on an areawide basis.

-2-

i

;

�-

i

,r·

l

I

'

•

.

SECTION II
DESCRIPTION OF PLANNING AREA

�DESCRIPTION OF PLANNING AREA

Location
The City of Eaton Rapids is located geographically within the
townships of Hamlin and Eaton Rapids in Eaton County,
Michigan.
Eaton County is part of the Lansing Metropolitan
Statistical Area as defined by the U.S. Census Bureau, along
with Ionia County, Clinton County and Ingham County.
It is a
rural county which has historically been primarily agricultural in nature.
Located approximately 70 miles from the
Ohio border, 65 miles from the Detroit Metropolitan Area, 30
miles from Jackson and 40 miles from Battle Creek, the City
is within a two hour drive of the majority of the state I s
population.
Map 1 depicts the general location of the City
within the Lansing Metropolitan Statistical Area as well as
the Great Lakes region .

.

I.

-3-

�•

,-·
\

}

i

I

\

'\

\

I

'\

'

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

'MAP 1
TRI-COUNTY REGION
CITY OF EATON RAPIDS

Gove Associates Inc •
. -4-

I

�·•·

I•
' '
;

) '

'A

1:
'..
•

..

'
I

'

r·

I

I

'.

)

'

SECTION Ill
POPULATION

�POPULATION

Introduction
People are a community's most valuable asset.
They are the
factor which allows the community to function as a complete
unit.
All other aspects of the community (i.e., government,
structures and thoroughfares) would cease to exist without
that one important element - people.
Characteristics of the City's population determine the
quality of life available within the City.
Local residents
through individual and collective efforts form the 'built'
environment (as distinguished from the natural environment).
This environment, consisting of industry, commerce, housing,
public places, streets and highways, is in turn intended to
serve those who live in and visit the City.
The built
environment and the local economy are dependent upon the
attitudes and backgrounds of local residents.
Such factors
as age, sex, education, income, life experiences and, most
importantly, attitude determine the type and quality of
lifestyle prevalent within the City.
These factors are consequently reviewed in detail below. Most of the data listed
and analyzed in this Plan is from the 1980 Census of
Population and Housing and, where possible, is updated to
current conditions using 1987 information.
It is assumed
througout the Plan that conditions have not dramatically
changed since the 1980 Census enough to substantially alter
any interpretation of that census data.
In those instances
where past trends allow for a calculated update of information, estimated figures will be used to arrive at an analysis of current conditions.
The population growth trends for the 1950-1980 period for
Michigan, the Lansing Standard Metropolitan Statistical Area
(Eaton, Clinton, Ingham and Ionia counties), Eaton County,
Charlotte, and Eaton Rapids are presented in Figure 1.
The
Lansing SMSA is located within the lower quarter of the State
of Michigan.
It is centrally located in the midst of the
area bounded by Bay City-Saginaw, Grand Rapids, Kalamazoo,
Battle Creek and Detroit. In 1980, it had a total population
of 471,565 inhabitants representing an 11.1 percent increase
over 1970.
The Lansing SMSA is a relatively homogeneous
unit.
Population growth within the entire Lansing SMSA has
occurred at a faster rate than within the City of Eaton
Rapids, as noted on Figure 2.
From the Figure, it can be
seen that the City of Eaton Rapids has maintained relatively
the same share of the total Lansing SMSA population since
1950.
The percentage has fallen only slightly during the
period studied, from 1.2 percent in 1950 to 1.0 percent in
1980. While Eaton Rapid's population increased 28.5 percent

-5-

�••

between 1950 and 1980, the City declined as a proportion of
Eaton County's total population, falling from 8.8 percent to
5 .1 percent because of population growth in the county's
townships.
The City contained 3,509 inhabitants in 1950 and
grew to 4,510 persons in 1980.
The Community's population
growth rate closely parallels that of Charlotte, the Lansing
SMSA and the State (see Figure 1).
FIGURE 1
POPULATION GROWTH
EATON RAPIDS AND VICINITY - 1950-1980
Thousands
10,000

~-

Michigan
5,000
p

1,000
0

p

500
Lansing SMSA

u
L

100
A

------

T
50
Eaton County

I
0

------

-

~

10
N

~

Charlotte
5

~

-

EATON RAPIDS
0

1950
SOURCE:

U.S. Bureau of the Census

-6-

1960

1970

1980

�FIGURE 2
POPULATION PROPORTIONS OF PARENT AREAS
EATON RAPIDS AND VICINITY - 1950-1980

25
Michigan as% of the East
North Central Region

20

Eaton County as a % of
Lansing SMSA

15

:_ ,

/
----

10
("

Eaton Rapids as a % of
Eaton County

-

r---_

5

:~

Lansing SMSA as % of Michigan
Eaton Rapids as a % of
Lansing SMSA

0
1950

SOURCE:

--

1960

1970

1980

U.S. Bureau of Census
Age/Sex Composition

Age and sex composition of the City's population is an important factor to consider in establishing the policies and programs that will best serve local residents.
Needs and lifestyles differ among various age groups.
Certain economic
factors, i.e. types of retail goods stocked and sold, are
dependent upon the proportion of men and women living in the
area.
There are several identifiable stages or cycles that individuals go through during the span of a lifetime.
These stages
each bring different predominant needs which in turn affect
other elements of life in the City, especially retail trade
and public services. The table on the following page depicts
the 1970 and 1980 age and sex composition of the City's population.
-7-

�TABLE 1
E1\TON RAPIDS AGE/SEX CCMPOOITIOO

e

I

f

Total

(%)

1970*
FanaleC%)

Male

(%)

Total

(%)

1980**
Fanale (%)

Change in Total
Age Group
1970-80
( %} Number
(%)

Male

Pre-School

I 5 and
Under

593

(11.9)

276

(10.7)

317

(13.3)

413

(9.2)

207

(8.8)

206

(9.6

(-30.3)

-180

Elarentary

6-13

904

(18.2)

476

(18.4)

428

(18.0~

678

(15.0)

315

(13. 4)

363

c16 • 9 &gt;I

&lt;-25 • o &gt;

-226

Secondary

14-18

489

(9.9)

259

(10.0)

230

c9. 7 &gt;I

430

(9.5)

210

(8.9)

220

&lt;10 • 2 &gt;I

c-12 .1 &gt;

-59

College

19-24

427

(8.6)

220

(8.5)

207

(8. 7)1

416

(9.2)

219

(9.3)

197

&lt;9. 2 &gt;I

(-2.6)

-11

Young Family

25-34

599

(12.1)

307

(11.9)

292

(12.3)1

707

(15. 7)

362

(15.3)

345

Cl6 • o &gt;I c+10. o &gt; +108

Established
Family

I 35-54 11,025 ( 20 .6)

521

( 20 .1)

504

(21.2)1

915

(20.3)

476

(20.2)

439

( 20 • 4 ~ (-10 • 7 )

-110

Mature
Family

155-641

409

(8.2)

229

(8.8)

180

c7 .6 &gt;I

379

(8.4)

211

(8.9)

168

(7.8~

(-7.3)

-30

Retired

165+

I

523

(10.5)

300

(11.6)

223

(9.4)

572

(12.7)

359

(15.2)

213

(9.9)

(+9.4)

+49

Total(%)

I

I 4,969

c100.o&gt; 2,500 c100.o&gt; 2,301 c100.o&gt; 4,510 (100.0) 2,359 (100.0) 2,151 (100.0)

(-9.2)

-459

Median Age

29.0

*Consists of Census Tract 213, City of Eaton Rapids • .Actual 1970 population for Eaton Rapids was 4,494.
**In 1980, Census Tract 213 was expanded to include portions of Eaton Rapids Township, which \\Bre in
Tract 212 in 1970.
SOURCE:

1970, 1980 U.S. Census of Population -STF3A

)

-)

-j

�Table 1 indicates that the number of residents in the 25-34
year age group and retirees ( over 65) actually increased.
These figures imply that, at least for the near future, community land uses and services that are oriented toward these
age groups might be increased in number and scope.
The
increase in the young families age group also reflect the
potential for an increase in the number of children living in
the City during the next 5 to 10 years.

I

-

Although municipal boundaries define the characteristics of
the residents of a community, they do not circumscribe the
number and characteristics of those that work, shop and play
in that community.
The volume of business and type and
quality of retail merchandise sold in downtown Eaton Rapids,
the type of labor force employed in the City and the public
services and facilities (particularly park and recreation) in
Eaton Rapids are also dependent upon the general characteristics of the population living in the immediate vicinity,
outside the City's corporate limits.
Consequently, the size
and characteristics of this population group is also an
important factor in planning for Eaton Rapids.
That is, the
City and its surrounding environs interact with, and impact
upon, each other.
Therefore the two townships (Eaton Rapids
and Hamlin) adjacent to the City are included in the analysis
of the population, housing, employment and physical characteristics of the general area.
Table 2 describes the age and sex composition of the two primary townships ( Eaton Rapids and Hamlin) within the City's
commercial market area which provide employees and customers
for businesses within the City and users of public services
and facilities within the City.

'

-

Table 2 shows that the population of the area surrounding the
City (i.e. Eaton Rapids and Hamlin townships) grew by almost
70 percent between 1970 and 1980 ( at the same time Eaton
County's population increased by 28. 2%).
New construction
permits issued for these townships since 1980 indicate that
they are continuing to grow much faster than the City.
Between 1980 and 1987, 275 permits for new residential construction were issued in Eaton Rapids and Hamlin townships,
resulting in a total residential growth rate of 99.3 percent
for these two townships combined.
The greatest population increase in Eaton Rapids Township and
Hamlin Township between 1970 and 1980 was in the 35-54 year
age group.
This age group comprised the largest portion of
the total population in 1970 and 1980.
It is interesting to
note that two age groups gained population in the City
between 1970 and 1980 - the 25-34 age group and 65 and older
age group.
Although those over 65 increased by almost 60
percent in the surrounding townships they were the fifth

-9-

�TABLE 2
EATON RAPIDS AND HAMLIN ~SHIPS
AGE/SEX Ca-1POOITION

1970

l&gt;,qe

Pre-School

1
I-'

?

I

5 and
Under

I

Falla-re- (%)

Male

Total

(%)

1980
Female (%)

Male

Total

(%)

367

(12.4)

180

(12.2)

187

&lt;12.5&gt; I

445

(8.9)

225

(9.1)

220

(%)

(%)

Change in Total
Age Group
1970-1980
(%)
Number

C8. 7&gt; I 21.3

+78

Elerrentary

6-13

428

(14.4)

200

(13.6)

228

(15.2)

812

(16. 2)

400

(16 .1)

412

(16. 2)

89.7

+394

Secondary

14-18

341

(11.5)

158

(10.7)

183

(12. 2)

539

(10.7)

246

C9. 9)

293

(11.5)

58.1

+198

College

19-24

208

(7.0)

111

(7.5)

97

(6.5)

393

(7.8)

193

(7.8)

200

(7.9)

88.9

+185

Young Family

25-34

456

(15.4)

244

(16 .6)

212

(14. 2)

812

(16.2)

418

(16. 9)

394

(15.5)

78.1

+356

Established
Family

35-54

685

(23.1)

333

(22.6)

352

(23.5)

1,274

( 25. 4)

622

(25.1)

652

(25.6)

86.0

+589

228

(7.7)

100

(6.8)

128

(8.6)

347

(6.9)

178

(7.2)

169

C6. 7&gt; I 52.2

+119

255

( 8. 6)

145

( 9. 9)

110

(7.3)

396

(7.9)

196

(7.9)

200

(7.9)

I 59.2

+141

Mature
Family

155-64

Retired

65+

I

2,968 (100.0) 1,471 (100.0) 1,497 (100.0)

Total(%)
Median Age

~)

I

I 69.1 2,050

5,010 c100.o&gt; 2,478 c100.o&gt; 2,540 c100.o&gt;

29.3

;))

.)
-

--

.l

-·-- --

!

�.....

t ••

fastest growing age group and increased at a lower growth
rate than the County's population in general.
The fastest
growing age group in the two townships is the 6-13 age group,
followed closely by 19-24 year olds and those in the 35-54
year old category.
The median age of residents in the
surrounding townships was 29. 3 years in 1980, compared to
similar 29.0 years in the City.
These were slightly higher
than in the County, where the median age in 1980 was 28. 3
years.
Table 3 depicts the age/sex composition of the entire
planning area. Overall, the City and Townships experienced a
20 percent increase (almost 1,600) between 1970 and 1980.
The largest numerical increase was in the 35-54 year age
group (established family) while the highest rate of growth
occurred in the 25 to 34 year age group (44%).
The only age
group that lost population was the pre-school (5 and younger)
group. This followed the national trend of a declining birth
rate.
Household/Family Composition
The composition of those individuals in families, single person households or group (two or more unrelated individuals)
living quarters define the socio-economic character of the
City and its surrounding area.
The number and type of
housing units and the effective buying power and purchasing
habits of local residents are a function of the type and
number of households.
Households, then, should be considered
the primary unit for evaluating and projecting housing,
retail sales and community facilities.
In Eaton Rapids,
there were 1,568 households in 1970 while at the same time
Hamlin and Eaton Rapids townships contained 905 households.
By 1980, the City's households increased by 2. 6 percent to
1,608.
The number of households in the townships increased
to 1,544 (70.6% over 1970), compared to a 69.4 percent rate
of increase in the population over that period of time.
In
effect, the City
experienced a disbursement of household
members and an increase in smaller households resulting in a
gain of housing
uni ts
and
an average decrease in the
number of persons living in each household, while in the
surrounding townships the growth in households increased at a
slightly faster rate than the growth in population.
This is
verified by the fact that the median number of persons per
household within the townships decreased from 3. 55 to 3. 22
(0.33 persons) between 1970 and 1980, while in the City the
median household decreased from 3.17 persons per household to
2. 7 9 per sons per household ( O. 3 8 per sons) during the same
period.
If existing trends continue, the need for additional
housing will continue to exist even as population within the
City declines.
Population projections, however, indicate
that the City's population will increase over the next 20
years.
-11-

�■

TABLE 3

CITY OF FATON RAPIDS, FATON RAPIDS AND HAMLIN ~SHIPS
NJF./SEX CCMPOOITION

1970

Total

p,qe

Pre-School

I
I-'
tv
I

5 and I
Older

Falla-re- (%)

Male

Total

(%)

(%)

1980
Fanale (%)

Male

(%)

960

(12.1)

456

(11.2)

504

(13.0)

858

(9.0)

432

(8.9)

426

(9.1)

(-10.6)

-102

Elem:ntary

6-13

1,332

(16.8)

676

(16.7)

656

(16. 9)

1,490

(15.6)

715

(14.8)

775

(16.5)

(ll.9)

158

Secondary

14-18

830

(10. 5)

417

(10.3)

413

(10.6)

969

(10.2)

456

(9.4)

513

(10.9)

(16.7)

139

college

19-24

635

(8.0)

331

(8.1)

304

(7.8)

809

(8.5)

412

(8.5)

397

(8.5)

(27.4)

174

Young Family 25-34

1,055

(13.3)

551

(13.6)

504

(13.0)

1,519

(15. 9)

780

(16.1)

739

(15.8)

(44.0)

464

Established
Family

I 35-54 I 1, 110

(21.5)

854

(21.0)

856

c22.1&gt;

I 2,109

&lt;23.2&gt; I (28.0)

479

Mature
Family

155-64

637

(8.0)

329

(8.1)

308

(7.9)

Retired

65+

778

(9.8)

445

(11.0)

333

(8.6)

Total (%)

SOURCE:

)
C--J

I

(I)

Change in Total
Age Group
1970-1980
(%)
Nunber

I

7,937 (100.0) 4,059 (100.0) 3,878 (100.0)

I

(23.0) 1,098

(22.7) 1,091

389

(8.1)

337

(7.2)

I (14.0)

89

555

(ll.5)

413

(8.8)

(24.4)

190

9,528 (100.0) 4,837 (100.0) 4,691 (100.0)

(20.0)

1,591

726
968

(7 .6 &gt;
(10. 2)

1970, 1980 U.S. Census of Pq,ulation - SI'F3A

JJ

·1 )

�I

\.

\..

:',. __

Each community has households consisting of married couple
families, single parent families, and individuals or two or
more unrelated persons.
These different types of households
affect the type and quantity of local services and f acilities, retail merchandise available and physical composition
of the community.
In Eaton Rapids, there were 988 married
couple families in 1980, comprising 61.4 percent of all
households. This represents a 14.4 percent decrease from the
1,154 married couple families in the City in 1970, when they
comprised 73.6 percent of all households.
At the same time,
the number of families with a female householder with no husband present almost doubled from 91 ( or 5. 8% of all households) in 1970 to 177 in 1980 (11.0%) of all households.
Between 1970 and 1980, the number of non-family households
decreased substantially from 305 in 1970 to 59 in 1980.
These figures indicate that family and non-family households
make up the major portion of the population that migrated
from Eaton Rapids between 1970 and 1980, while single parent
households are becoming an increasingly larger component of
the City's population, although husband and wife families
still comprise the majority of the City's households.
Within the surrounding townships in 19 80, there were 1,234
married couple families making up 79.9 percent of all households, compared to 718 married couple families in 1970, when
they comprised 79.5 percent of all households.
By 1980, the
number of families with a female householders and no husband
present increased to 81 (or 5.2% of all households) from 45
( 5. 0% of all households) in 1970.
Non-family households
decreased from 119 in 1970 to 27 (1.7% of all households) in
1980.
Comparison of data between the City and surrounding
townships shows that the ratio of married couple families to
total households in the townships has been much more consistent than in the City.
At the same time, families with a
female householder (most likely widowed or divorced) increased at the same rate in both areas.

-13-

�Education/Occupation
Two primary determinants of the income earning capacity and
consequent spending power of individuals and households are
the extent of formal education and the related occupations of
local residents.
Table 4 depicts the education level of
residents 18 years and older in Eaton Rapids and Eaton Rapids
and Hamlin Townships in 1980.
TABLE 4
YEARS OF SCHOOL COMPLETED
18 YEARS OLD AND OVER - 1980

Eaton Rapids City
Percent
Number
of Total
Elementary (0-8 Yrs.)
Through High School
(1-3 Yrs.&gt;
High School ( 4 Yrs.)

833

27.4

883

26. 7

1,343

44.1

1,706

51.6

517
229
122

17.0
7.5
4.0

474
138
104

14.3
4.2
3.2

3,044

100.0

3,305

100.0

College
- 1 to 3 Yrs.
- 4 Yrs.
- 5 or More Yrs.
Total
SOURCE:

Townships
Percent
Number
of Total

1980 Census STF3A

Table 4 shows that residents of the City in 1980 had more of
a tendency to have some college education than residents of
the townships (28.5% of all residents over 18 in the City compared to 21.7% of all township residents in that age group).
This fact should be reflected in a higher per capita annual
income for the · City's residents and a higher proportion of
occupations that require a formal education. The occupational
characteristics of the residents of the City, surrounding
townships and the City of Mason are depicted in Table 5.

-14-

~

;

�_.,,,-...,.

TABLE 5
EMPIDYMENI' BY OCCUPATION - 1980
PERSONS 16 YEARS AND OLDER

i '

-

\
,,

~

L

Townships
Eaton Rapids City
Percent
Percent
Number of Total
Number of Total

,·'L.,;
r·-I-.

...

f ,

L:

't
'
'-:::--

'~

'·

.

'.

City of Mason
Percent
Number of Total

Executive, Administrative,
Managerial

159

8.8

146

7.0

231

8.5

Professional Specialty

219

12.0

149

7.1

391

14.4

Technicians and Related
Support

38

2.1

32

1.5

59

2.2

Sales

163

9.0

190

9.1

289

10. 6

Clerical Support

317

17.4

355

17.0

585

21.6

Private Household Services

18

1.0

9

0.4

19

0.7

Protective Services

11

1.0

18

1.0

41

1.5

269

14.8

129

6.2

257

9.5

0

84

4.0

51

1.9

Services, Except Protective
and Household
Farming, Forestry and
Fishing

6

Precision Production,
Craft and Repair

200

11.0

377

18.1

338

12.4

Machine Operators,
Assemblers and Inspectors

287

15.8

339

16.3

225

8.3

Transportation, Material
Moving

75

4.1

140

6.7

122

4.5

Handlers, Equiprrent
Cleaners, Helpers, Laborers

55

3.0

117

5.6

105

3.9

1,817

100.0

2,085

100.0

2,713

100.0

Total Persons
16 Years and Older
OOURCE:

1980 Census STF3A

·;-.,--

'&lt;---~,,

-15-

�Table 5 shows that a higher proportion of residents of the
City tend to have professions that require a formal education
beyond high school.
That is, a larger percentage of the
City's residents than those living
in the surrounding
townships are engaged in administrative, managerial, professional specialty, and technical occupations.
At the same
time, a larger proportion of township residents than City
residents had occupations, such as production, craft and
repair,
machine
operators,
assemblers
and
inspectors,
transporters and laborers, that require less technical and
formal education.
It is also interesting to note that a
substantially larger proportion of the City's residents than
the townships' residents had service occupations in 1980
( 14. 8% compared to 6. 2%).
These are primarily associated
with commercial services and office activities.
Population Projections
The number and composition of the population of the City and
surrounding townships over the next 20 years will be the
foundation upon which community facilities and services, land
use, housing, employment and retail trade will be structured.
While it is not possible to project the composition of the
area's future population, it is possible to estimate the
number of people that will most likely live in the City and ·
surrounding townships over the next 20 years.
The following
depicts three methods used to estimate the projected population for the City of Eaton Rapids to the year 2010.
Method I:

Past Growth Trend - Based on actual Census counts
over past 30 years.
Year
Population

1950
3,509

1960
4,052

1970
4,494

1980
4,510

Growth rates vary from 15. 5% between 1950 and
1960 to 10.9% between 1960 and 1970 to 0.36% between 1970 and 1980 or an average growth rate of
8.9% over a 10 year period.
If this average is
used, the following projections will result.
Year
Population
Method II:

1990
4,911

1995
5,129

2000
5,348

2005
5,586

2010
5,824

Population projection using new housing construction and household densities.
The following are median
taken from Census data:

household

1970

3.17 persons per household

1980

2.79 persons per household

-16-

densities

�There is a decrease of .38 persons per household
between 1970 and 1980, which is equivalent to a
12 percent decrease.
It is assumed that the percentage change value will decrease one point
every 10 years until 2010. The resulting projection of household densities is as follows:

-...,

1987
2.57

1990
2.48

1995
2.36

2000
2.23

2005
2.13

2010
2.03

The number of occupied housing units in the City
for 1986 is estimated by adding the total of new
housing uni ts constructed in the City between
1980 and 1986 (discounted by 4% for average
vacancy rate), to the total occupied housing
stock in 1980.
There is an estimated total of
1,740 uni ts for 1986, compared to 1,608 in 1980
(from the U.S. Census of Housing).
The projected future occupied housing
stock
(based on the 1980-86 construction rate) is:
1987
1,761

1990
1,827

1995
1,937

2000
2,046

2005
2,156

2010
2,265

Multiplying the estimated number of occupied
units by the estimated average household density
for each year yields the following population
projection:
;

,_

.

i

'

'

Year
Population
Method

L.

III:

Year
Population

1987
4,526

1990
4,531

1995
4,571

Use Tri-County Regional
for Eaton Rapids.*
1987
4,544

1990
4,558

1995
4,582

2000
4,563

2005
4,592

Population
2000
4,606

2005
4,630

2010
4,598
projections
2010
4,655

r ·
j
I -

*Tri-County Regional Planning Commission, October 1988,
Lansing, Michigan

-17-

�Method I represents a high projected growth in population.
Method II depicts a low increase in population and Method III
can be considered the medium projection.
The accepted projection for this Plan is that shown in Method III, or the
medium projection.
The 1980 population in the two surrounding townships totalled
5,018.
Again, three projection methods can be used to estimate the future population for this area.
The first method
utilizes past growth trends for each 10 year period, which
varied from 21.5 percent between 1950 and 1960 to 69.4 percent between 1970 and 1980.
Using an average 10 year growth
rate
of
45. 5
percent,
the
following
projections
are
established:
Method I

Year
Population

1990
7,300

1995
8,962

2000
10,623

2005
13,040

2010
15,457

The second method is based on actual new housing construction
data and the change in household densities for the two
townships.
The density change in households in Eaton Rapids
and Hamlin townships between 1970 and 1980 was -0.32 persons.
That is, the average household density decreased from 3. 55
persons in 1970 to 3.23 persons in 1980.
Between 1980 and
July 1987, 275 new "stick-built" and mobile residential units
were constructed in this area.
Projecting the future average household density for the two
townships through 2010 and multiplying that by the projected
number of housing uni ts, based upon 1980-198 7 construction
permits, yields the following population projections:
Method II
Year
Population

1990
5,709

1995
5,885

2000
6,004

2005
6,437

2010
6,417

The third method, as in the projections for the City, is to
utilize regional projections. These projections, provided by
the Tri-County Regional Planning Commission, are as follows:
Method III

Year
Population

1990
7,173

1995
8,050

2000
8,926

2005
9,802

2010
10,679

In this instance, Method III, using the regional projections,
is the medium projection and will be used as the estimate of
future population for this Plan.

-18-

�Consequently, the following table recaps the population that is
projected for the Planning Area to the year 2010.
These forecasts
are
based
on past
trends
and reflect
the most
"reasonable" middle line estimates for the planning period.
TABLE 6

POPULATION PROJECTIONS
Estimate
1987

t' "'.

1990

1995

2000

2005

2010

City of
Eaton Rapids

4,544

4,558

4,582

4,606

4,630

4,655

Hamlin and Eaton
Rapids Townships

6,527

7,173

8,050

8,926

9,802

10,679

11,071

11,731

12,632

13,532

14,432

15,334

I .

'L,

'

Total
Planning Area
SOURCE:

Gove Associates Inc. Projections; Tri-County Region
Population Projections
Synopsis

Historically, the City has grown at about the same rate as the
rest of the Region. However, between 1970 and 1980, the City's
growth rate was substantially lower than in the preceding
decades.
The surrounding townships experienced a relatively
large increase in population, with a 60 percent growth rate.
Based upon past trends, the City is expected to continue to
grow, although that growth will not be significant.
At the
same time, the townships should increase by more than 4,000
people.
Overall, the need for housing will continue, in both
the City and townships, as the size of individual households
continues to decline.
While forecasts are based upon past trends, these projections
can change in response to local policies and development decisions.
For example, if the City were to actively pursue residential (including multiple-family) development within its
municipal boundaries, the rate of population growth could
increase.
Additionally, the projected growth in Eaton Rapids
Township and Hamlin Township could provide a solid base for
increased commercial development within Eaton Rapids.

-19-

l

\
I
I

l

I
I

�c-

l;

SECTION IV
HOUSING

�'

.

HOUSH~

Housing Characteristics
Many elements of a community make up its quality of life, and
housing is one of the most important elements.
Housing is
unique because it is really the only component with the community that is intimately associated with each household and
at the same time, when taken as a whole, is a primary community resource. Whereas businesses and community facilities
are important to the total perception and functioning of an
area, they are not as integral to household functioning as
individual residences.
Consequently, the quality of housing
more directly reflects the quality of life of a household.
Housing Occupancy

l.

l ..

1 •-.

Housing occupancy refers to owner-occupied, renter-occupied
or vacant housing that is available for occupancy.
In 1970
there were 1, 714 housing uni ts in the City ( of which 1,640
were year-round) and 944 residences in the surrounding
townships (of which 940 were year-round).
At that time in
the City 1,219, or 74 percent, of the year-round units were
occupied by households that owned their own residence, while
342 units (21%) were renter-occupied and 70 units (5%) were
vacant.
Compared to the surrounding townships, where owneroccupied housing comprised 81 percent of all year-round units
and renter-occupied housing made up 14. 5 percent of yearround housing, the City had a larger renter base. The City's
position as a center for rental activity increased during the
1970-1980 decade.
By 1980, even though the total number of
housing uni ts in the City actually declined to 1,700, the
year-round housing increased to 1,665, or 98 percent of the
total supply, indicating that the majority, if not all, of
the units that were removed during the 1970's were seasonal.
During the same 10 year period, the number of owner-occupied
houses decreased by 55 units while 102 new rental units were
added to the housing stock.
Eaton Rapids and Hamlin
townships experienced a
substantial increase in owneroccupied housing (to 1,366 units) while only 41 rental units
were added to the housing supply in those areas.
By 1980,
therefore, owner-occupied housing comprised 70 percent of the
City's supply of year-round housing, compared to 85 percent
for the townships.
At the same time, rental housing made up
27 percent of the City's year-round stock and only 11 percent
of the townships'.
New housing in the City between 1980 and July, 1987 continued
to be oriented toward rental uni ts.
Of the 13 7 new uni ts
built during that period, 18 were duplexes and 86 were
multiple-family apartments, while only 33 were single-family

-20-

�structures.
At the same time, 275 uni ts were built in the
townships, including 45 mobile homes.
Although no data is
available to determine the proportion of those new units that
are being rented, it is estimated (using the same proportion
of rental uni ts to year-round uni ts that existed in 1980)
that there were 215 rental uni ts in the townships in July,
1987, or an increase of 37 rental units over 1980. Table 7 Planning Area Housing Uni ts - depicts the changes that have
occurred over the past 17 years within the City and
townships.
The table also indicates that single-family homes in the
surrounding
townships
represented the largest numerical
increase in housing type within the area. Very few multiplefamily units have been built in the townships,
while
multiple-family housing increased at a faster rate than any
other housing type in the City.
As a matter of fact, the
majority of new housing units in the City between 1970 and
1987 was multiple-family housing, reflecting the trend toward
more mobility and a changing household composition (more
single persons and childless couples).
Age of Housing Stock
An important indicator of the quality and cultural significance of a community's housing stock is its age.
In 1970,
59 percent of the City's housing was built before 1940, that
is, 30 years old or older.
By 1980, 46. 6 percent of all
housing uni ts in the City were built before 1940 and, of
those, 26 percent were rental uni ts.
Almost 46 percent of
all rental units were constructed prior to 1940, compared to
almost 48 percent for all owner-occupied housing, indicating
that, in general, deteriorated housing is not concentrated
within rental units although owner-occupied housing
is
typically maintained in better condition than rental housing.
Within the surrounding
areas
(Eaton Rapids and Hamlin
townships), 50 percent of all housing was built before 1940,
as reported in the 1970 Census.
By 1980, only 33 percent of
all the townships' housing was constructed prior to 1940.
Among all rental uni ts in 1980, 50 percent were constructed
before 1940, while 30 percent of all owner-occupied housing
was 40 years or older.
According to the 1969 Eaton Rapids Comprehensive Development
Plan survey, the largest proportion of the City's oldest
housing units were located in the northwest and central sections; that is, the area bordered by Alice Street on the
south and the Grand River on the east (see Map 2).
Table 8
displays the current distribution of older housing in the
Study Area, as of July 1987.

-21-

�(

-~

M

·•·-

~

- --,-

-

-·,

, - ..,. 1

J

TABLE 7
PLANNING AREA HOUSING UNITS

City of Eaton Rapids

-

I of
1970

I of

'lbtal

70-8

I of

1980

Total Units

100.0

1,700

100.0

1,837

100.0

7.2

944

100.0

Year-Round

1,640

96.3

1,673

97.9

1,810

98.5

9.7

943

99.9

Renter--0::cupied

2 to 9
10 or M:ire
M::&gt;bile Hailes or
Trailer

I of
Ox~ied

1970

I of
Oxueied

Total

Total

July
1987

1,606

100.0

1,881

100.0

99.3

1,606

100.0

1,881

100.0

99.5

1980

I of
CX:cupied

I of
CX:cupied

1970

Total

1980

'lbtal

July
1987

2,658

100.0

3,306

100.0

3,718

100.0

39.9

97.6

3,279

99.2

3,691

99.3

42.3

2,593

I of
Ox~ied

I of
Oxupied

'of

Chart;jE

Total

70-8

I of
Oxueied

I of
Ox~ied

1,164

72.4

1,197

68.6

-1.8

766

84.8

1,366

88.5

1,604**

88 . 2

109.4

1,985

80.6

2,530

80.3

2,801**

78.6

41.l

342

21.9

444

27.6

548

31.4

60.2

137

15.2

178

11.5

215**

11.8

56.9

479

19.4

622

19.7

763**

21.4

59.3

1,360*

I of

I of

I of

I of

I of

I of

I of

I of

I of

YearRound

YearRound

YearRound

YearRound

Year-

Year-

Round

Round

YearRound

YearRound

YearRound

1,353

80.9

1,386

76.6

1.9

938*

99.5

1,447

90.l

1,677

89.2

78.8

2,298*

88.6

2,800

85.4

3,063

83.0

33.3

278

269

16.l

293

16.2

5.3

5

0.5

46

2.9

46

2.4

820.0

283

10.9

315

9.6

339

9. 2

19.8

12

23

1.4

103

5.7

758.3

0

11

0.7

11

0.6

-

12

0.5

34

1.1

114

3.1 850.0

28

l. 7

28

1.5

N/A

102

6.3

147

7.8

WA

130

4. 0

175

4.7

-

82.9

-

*Includes M'.Jbile Hailes or Trailer
*"Gove Esturates
SOURCE:

I
I of

I of

78.l

Year-Round

Sin, le-Family

Total

I of

Total

I
I of Chan;ie
80-87
Total

1,219

lb. of Units
in Structure:

I

Olan;jE

'lbtal

Owner--Ocx::upied

IV
IV

'

I of

1,714

I of
Ox~ied

I

July
1987

Eaton ~ids &amp; Hamlin '11::7wnshies

U.S. Census 1970 Census Tract Data; 1980 srF3A; Field Survey; Consuner Questionnaire; Buildin, Permit Data

-

WA

�---------------L-1

--...

~

'

.

..

~-s.

, ·

i
I
I

..
--...~

·&lt;

, _ ·_•·

I

(

~

I

· 1···
'

-'.

~ ~~

1

III--·

I
11

'

.

I

~
~

I

'

-~--~""~
-. . ·I
I

~ ~! •

"

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
Legend

.

..E;w;J

SOUND

c=J

MINOR

CD

SXJia:

MAJOR

REHABILITATION

-

MAP 2
STRUCTURAL QUALITY SURVEY - 1967

STANDARD'

REHABILITATION - DEFICIENT

SUBSTANDARD
STRUCTURAL

QUALITY

DISTRICTS

F.aton Rapids Carprehensive Developuent Plan, 1969

@

Gove Associates Inc.

-23-

: = = ; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- - -- -- - - - - - -

�TABLE 8

r:

HOUSH-13 BUILT PRIOR TO 1940 (1987)

;·-;"'

YearRound
No. of
Units

'

l

, ...,
i

% of
% of
of
No.
of
Total
Total
No.
of
Total
OwnerRenter- RenterYear- ownerRound Occu:eied Occu:eied Occu:eied Occu:eied
%

l

City of
Eaton Rapids

;
~

770

42.7

555

46.4

203

37.0

Eaton Rapids/
Hamlin Twps • 533

28.3

415

25. 9

89

41. 3

1,303

35.4

970

34.6

292

38.2

!

."
.,,

~

I
1

•

Total

SOURCE: U.S. 1980 Census STF3A; Local Building Permit Records

r

1

In general, the City's housing stock is proportionally older
than the townships, with owner-occupied housing containing
the larger percentage of older units while the townships have
a higher proportion of older rental housing than the City.
Newer housing units (those built since 1970), while not
indicative of over all housing quality, do reflect the relative growth, change and vitality of the community.
Since
1970, 353 new housing uni ts have been constructed in Eaton
Rapids, representing over 19 percent of the City's total
housing supply.
Eaton Rapids and Hamlin Townships combined
have had 586 new homes constructed since 1970 ( 31% of the
total housing stock in these areas).
Forty-five percent of
the new units constructed within the City since 1970 have
been multiple-family while the majority (76%) constructed
since 1980 have been dwellings of two or more units.
Within
the two townships, only seven percent of all new housing
since 1970 has been multiple-family ( 2 or more uni ts) and
since 1980 there have been no new multiple-family units
constructed.
Housing Value
The market value of housing, both in terms of median value
and percentage of housing under a specified value, is a good
indicator of housing quality as well as housing demand.
In
1970, the median value of an owner-occupied residence in the
City was $14,300 while the median value of an owner-occupied
house within the two townships was 9. 8 percent higher at
$15,700. At the same time, the median value of a house in

-24-

�Eaton County was $17,900 or 25 percent higher than in Eaton
Rapids Township and 14 percent higher than in the two
townships.
By 1980, owner-occupied residences in the City
had a median value of $34,200 - an increase of 139 percent
over 1970, and by 1988 the average sale price of a house in
Eaton Rapids was $51,395.
Between 1970 and 1980, owneroccupied housing in the township increased in value by 196
percent to $46,500 while within the County in general, the
value of such housing jumped by 155 percent to $45,600.
Table 9 shows these housing values.
TABLE 9
MEDIAN OWNER-OCCUPIED HOUSIN:i VALUE
AverA9e
Sale
Price

Percent
Chanqe

1970

1980

Eaton Rapids

$14,300

$34,200

$51,395

+139

+50.l

Townships

$15,700

$46,500

N/A

♦ 196

N/A

~17.900

~45.600

N/A

+155

N,!'.A

Eaton Count:z'.
SOURCE,

1988

1970-80 1980-88

1970, 1980 Census of Housinq1 Tri-County Regional

Planning co-ission

These large rates of appreciation between 1970 and 1980
occurred during a period of artifically high inflation and
housing prices during the 1980-1988 period appreciated at
about one-third the 1970-1980 rates.
These figures do,
however, show that the value of owner-occupied housing in the
City appreciated at a slower rate than within the County as a
whole, while housing in the townships realized a substantially greater increase in value than in both the City and
remainder of the County.
Median contract rent is another indicator of the quality of
housing, although it is also dependent upon the availability
of supply and the extent of local demand for rental uni ts.
Table 10 depicts the median contract rents paid to landlords
in the townships, City and County in 1970 and 1980, as well
as an average rental rate for the City for 1989.
TABLE 10
MEDIAN MONTHLY CONTRACT RENTS
Percent
Change
1970-ilO
1980-89

1970

1980

1989

Eaton Rapids

S 84

$169

$470*

+101

♦ 178

Townships

s

72

$201

N/A

♦ 179

N/A

!107

$227

N/A

+112

N/A

Eaton Count:z'.
SOURCE:

1970, 1980 Census of Housing: Local realtor

*Represents average of rents ranging fro■ $225 for one
bedroo■ apart-nt, to $720 for new three bedroom house.

-25--,

~

�i:
! .

Li

i.;

Median contract rents have changed most dramatically in the
townships, while the slowest rate of rent increases occurred
in the City.
It is interesting to note that during this 10
year period the cost of renting in the townships surpassed
the cost of renting in the City.
This comparative change in
ranking of rental rates between the City and townships
occurred in spite of the fact that there were more renteroccupied units added to the City's housing stock than to the
townships' housing stock.
The greater increase within the
townships may be due to a relatively larger proportion of new
rental housing having been built in those jurisdictions. The
increase in rental rates in the City was substantially higher
in the 1980-89 period than the period between 1970 and 1980
( 178% vs 101%).
This can partially be attributed to thehigher inflation that occurred in the early 1980's.
It can
also be attributed to a low supply/high demand factor for
adequate rental housing and the fact that the increased cost
of buying a home has caused many households to remain in the
rental market.
There is no current data available for
average rents paid in the townships.
However, based upon
1980 data and assuming a strong correlation between the rent
paid and the quality of the unit, the overall quality of rental housing in the City is lower than in the townships.

Plumbing Facilities
''

.

l.
! .

The lack of certain basic plumbing facilities is sometimes
used as an indicator to determine the presence of substandard
housing in a community.
In Eaton Rapids, 80 units or 4. 7
percent showed the lack of some or all plumbing facilities in
1970, including 48 owner-occupied, 21 renter-occupied and 11
vacant units.
By 1980, the number of these units decreased
substantially to 18, including 11 owner-occupied and six
renter-occupied. The percentage of units without plumbing is
substantially lower than either the townships, County or
State.
TABLE 11
UNITS LACKIN3 SOME OR ALL PLUMBIN3:

,-·

1970, 1980

f

No.
1970
Eaton Rapids
Eaton Rapids and
Hamlin Townships
Eaton County
State of Michigan

•

SOURCE:

% of
Total
Units

80
87

4.7
9.2
N/A

123,827

No.
1980
18
41
423
30,215

% of
Total
Units
1.1
2.6

-77.5
-47.1

1. 3
0.8

-75.7

1970, Census Tract Data; 1980 Census, STF3A

-26-

%

Change
1970-80

�Housing Quality

I
I

I

I

I

A "windshield" housing survey was conducted in the City of
Eaton Rapids in the summer of 1987. The purpose of this survey was to gather data which would identify existing land
uses and provide the basis for determining the quality of the
existing housing stock within the City.
The information
contained in this section will help to establish present and
future housing needs, goals and objectives, and will aid in
determining suitable methods for achieving future housing
requirements.
The determination of housing quality was based on the
exterior appearance of the structure. The criteria ·for identifying and mapping structures is included in the Appendix.
Essentially, the determination of the soundness of a structure was based upon the degree of deterioration observed
through visual inspection.
If a house needed relatively
little work to bring it up to standard condition, it was considered sub-standard.
If it needed serious or major modifications, it was designated as dilapidated.
As in any community, the housing stock is one of Eaton
Rapid's primary resources.
An adequate supply of good
quality housing, available to families at all income levels,
is important to the general health and well being of the
City's residents.
An adequate housing stock is also an
important resource for attracting new development to the area
and for maintaining an aesthetically pleasing residential
environment within the City.
The results of the windshield survey, combined with derived
estimates of total housing units, shows that approximately 25
percent of the structures within the City are sub-standard or
dilapidated (Table 12).
Approximately 375 structures were
estimated to be in a sub-standard condition, while 80 were
estimated to be in a dilapidated condition.
Sub-standard
structures would require minor rehabilitation to be restored
to a standard condition.
Dilapidated structures would
require major rehabilitation to be restored to a standard
condition.

-27-

A .i

�TABLE 12
EATON RAPIDS HOUSIN3 QUALITY
f .......

Classification
Standard
Sub-Standard
Dilapidated
Total
SOURCE:

\
' •.

No. of Structures

% of Total

1,380
375
82

75.1
20.4
4.5

1,837

100.0

Gove Associates Inc.; Land Use Survey, 1987

Generally speaking, the overall quality of the housing stock
in Ea ton Rapids is good.
The majority of sub-standard and
dilapidated housing is located on the west side of the Grand
River, north of Grand Street and northwest of Michigan
Street.
These are the older residential neighborhoods with
smaller building lots and housing units. Most of the housing
in standard condition is located in the eastern section of
the City.
3 describes the general locations of concentrations of
dilapidated and sub-standard housing, as well as those areas
that are primarily or entirely developed with housing in
standard condition.

Map

Synopsis

l.

l

l ..

Eaton Rapids is experiencing a transition from a housing
stock that is predominantly sing le-family owner-occupied to
one that is expanding with rental uni ts, especially apartments.
Because the City has been the center of development
and settlement in this portion of the county, its housing
stock
is
generally
older
than
the
housing
found
in
surrounding
townships,
where
development
is
relatively
recent.
Since about 80 percent of the City's housing uni ts
were built before 1970, it is likely that many residences in
Eaton Rapids are not in conformance with current standard
housing codes.
The age of these uni ts, combined with the
fact that many are on smaller lots, has resulted in a relatively lower median value compared to housing in surrounding
areas.
Overall, however, most of the City's housing is in
fair-to-good condition, with pockets of one or more uni ts
that are deteriorating.
A primary objective should be to
protect and enhance the housing that now exists in the City
while rehabilitating those units that are worth saving.
The
resulting impact should be an improved and quality-oriented
inventory of housing.

-28-

�EATON RAPIDS#

.
.I

\

II

I

I

'

. - • • • • "11

HII

I

~~~'

filfilllil llllll

- ·~ ·

\

._______
~l_
..._I .

I

L.

WC

1/,

-~

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

MAP 3
STRUCTURAL QUALITY" SURVEY - 1987

legend

UOlilllllli

STANDARD

Wffe./41
it,:,'A

MINOR REHABILITATION

scx.mcE:

MAJOR REHABILl~ATION

Eaton Rapids rana. Use

Gove Associates Inc.

survey, 1987
-29-

�r
l

j'

I .·
r

j :

l ..

\.'

\

\
\
t

•

\

SECTION V

'

i

L --

)
I

'

,

ECONOMY

�ECONOMY
Introduction
The development of a community is influenced to a great
extent by economic activity within and near its boundaries.
Studies of the local and regional economy are therefore
essential as a basis for forecasting the type, amount and
timing of the growth that will occur in the community and
consequently the public facilities that will be required.

Regional Economy
The economy of a community is heavily influenced by regional
trends.
In large part, when the reg ion is prospering, this
prosperity is reflected in local communities.
For this
reason, regional economic trends need to be assessed before
local trends are evaluated.

, .,
I

!I

•

',... .

As mentioned previously, the City of Eaton Rapids is in Eaton
County, which is part of the Lansing-East Lansing Metropolitan Statistical Area (MSA), consisting of Eaton, Ingham,
Ionia and Clinton counties.
The City of Lansing, the state
capital,
is located in the northwest portion of Ingham
County, less than 20 miles north of Eaton Rapids.
Because of
the City's proximity to Lansing and its location within the
Lansing MSA, the economic trends of the MSA directly affect
the economy of Eaton Rapids.
The Tri-County Region•sl
economic base has historically been
associated with automobile manufacturing and state government
employment.
Although the automobile industry has been
declining it still remains a major employment source within
the Reg ion.
As with the country as a whole, the Reg ion's
economy is becoming increasingly oriented toward nonmanufactur ing ind us tries, such as professional services, motel and
restaurant employment.
The Lansing-East Lansing area is the economic as well as
political center of the Reg ion.
The three major employers
are the State of Michigan, employing 22,200 people, Michigan
State University,
with
9,500
employees
and the BuickOldsmobile-Cadillac Group of General Motors, which employs
23,000 people.
Auto related manufacturing firms in the area

1 The Lansing-East Lansing MSA encompasses Eaton, Clinton,
Ing ham and Ionia counties, while the Reg ion consists of
Eaton, Clinton and Ingham counties.

-30-

�also employed about 14,000 persons in 1984.
In addition,
6,000 people are employed in agriculture or agriculturalrelated industries within the three county area.

,,,-....
'?'

The characteristics of employment in the Region, as mentioned
earlier, have changed over time from a strong emphasis on
manufacturing to a nonmanuf actur ing employment base.
Table
13, which shows the profile of regional employment in 1979,
1984 and August 1987, reflects that change.
As depicted in Table 13, the Reg ion experienced an overall
decrease in employment between 1979 and 1984, when inflation
and unemployment were high and a recession in effect.
The
recovery from that period of economic downturn is displayed
by the increase in the Reg ion's employment between 1984 and
1987.
Among those major industrial sectors identified in
Table 13, federal government employment increased at the
fastest rate between 1979 and 1987, followed by wholesale
trade and retail trade.
The largest decrease occurred in
construction employment, which declined by 28 percent between
1979 and 1984 and has pretty well stabilized since that time.
Manufacturing also lost a relatively large proportion of its
employment base during the 1979-1984 period but experienced a
slight gain between 1984 and 1987.
The net loss in manufacturing -jobs over the 1979-1987 period was the largest among
all sectors.

-31-

,,,,--....

,.

�TABLE 13

n.

EMPLOYMENI' PROFILE BY INDUSTRY
TRI-&lt;X&gt;UNTY REX:;ION*

}
~

!l

r-

'

l .

%

r-:

Change
1979-84

%

August
1987

%

Change Change
1984-87 1979-87

1979

1984

State and weal Governrrent

55,198

53,933

2.3

56,200

+4.2

+1.8

Manufacturing

40,527

34,892

-13.9

36,000

+3.2

-11.2

Services

37, 769

42,985

+13.8

37,100

-15.9

-1.8

Retail Trade

31,077

30,615

-1.5

31,900

+4.2

+2.6

Finance, Insurance,
Real Estate, Banking

12,693

14,140

+11.4

11,700

-21.0

-7.8

Construction

8,446

6,046

-28.4

6,000

Agriculture

6,673

6,396

-4.2

N/A

Transportation, Utilities

5,668

4,983

-12.1

5,100

+2.3

-10.0

Woolesale Trade

5,775

5,274

-8.7

7,000

+32.7

+21.1

Federal Governrrent
(Civilian)

2,449

2,875

+15.0

3,100

+7.8

+24.0

i

Military

1,067

1,275

+19.5

N/A

l ,.

Other (Industry classification not available)

2,611

3,708

+42.0

28,800

210,003

207,122

-1.4

222,900

+7.6

+6.1

L_~
'

\

..__.,.

ra

!L~
r.
:

l ;
f

•

i'

0

-29.0

I

I •

f
L ••

Total

I•
;·

~ -··•

* In 1985, Benchmark adjustrrents were made to civilian labor force errployrrent and
unerrployrrent figures to reflect new population controls and errployrrent count
adjustrrents. Consequently, direct carparisons between pre-1985 and post-1985
data are not necessarily achieved. In addition, the 1987 data is fran the
Michigan E:cployment Security Carmission Lansing Labor Market Review while 1979
and 1984 data are taken fran Michigan Departrrent of Ccmnerce data.
Therefore
'other' errployment figures are not carparable.
SOURCE:

Michigan Departrrent of Ccmnerce, Econanic Profiles of Clinton, Eaton and
Ingham Counties

-32-

�Household incomes are another indicator of tne strength of
the regional economy.
Tanle 14 describes the per capita and
average household incomes for the Region for 1980 and 1985.
TABLE 14
PER CAPITA AND HOUSEHOLD INCOME
TRI-COUNTY REGION
1980-85
%

Per Capita
Household
SOURCE:

1980

1985

Increase

$7,609

$10,943

43.8

$23,278

$31,066

33.4

1985 Local Population Estimates, U.S. Census

The Region's per capita income of $10,943 in 1985 was 0.4
percent higher than the 1985 statewide per capita income of
$10,902. ·
Dollar Value Added by Manufacturing - This measure is one of
the best and most accurate means of analyzing the importance
of manufacturing in a region.
The dollar value added by
manufacturing is the amount of income which is derived from
all manufactured goods after all expenses for the cost of
materials, supplies, containers, fuel, purchased electricity
and contract work have been subtracted from the value of
shipments of manufacturing establishments.
Between 1967 and 1982, the total dollar value added by manufacturing in the Lansing-East Lansing MSA increased by 158
percent.
A smaller increase (127%) occurred at the state
level.
Eaton County has a minor portion of the dollar value added
by manufacturing in the state and in the MSA.
Three per
cent of the total state figures and 6. 3 percent of the MSA
value was produced in Eaton County in 1982.
However, in the
County,
the
dollar
volume added by manufacturing
has
increased faster than both the state and the Region at 246
percent.

-33-

�TABLE 15
VALUE ADDED BY MANUFACTURING
Million Dollars
Lansing
State

i '

l

.t

~A

% of
State

% of
calhoun State

Eaton

% of
State

Jackson

% of
State

1982

$39,ll8 -l

$1,892.4

4.8

$1,049.5

2.7

$119.4

0.3

$481. 7

1.4

1977

37,566.0

1,435.5

3.8

944.2

2.5

ll2.4

0.3

542.9

1.4

1972

23,377.4

981.4

4.2

635.0

2.7

59.9

0.3

377.9

1.6

1967

17,241.6

733.0

4.25

473.4

2.7

34.5

0.2

277.9

1.6

scx.H:E:

Census of Manufacturers

New Capital Expenditures in Manufacturing - This is another
good indicator of manufacturing activity within an area.
New
capital expenditures represent the money spent for permanent
additions and major alterations to industrial plants, as well
as for new machinery and equipment. New capital expenditures
in the Lansing MSA and Eaton County are shown in Table 16.

r.
I

I

New capital expenditures
increased considerably in the
Lansing MSA and Eaton County between 1958 and 1963. Spending
on capital items depends somewhat heavily on the national
economy.
In 1958, there was a national recession and new
capital expenditures everywhere were low.
In 1963, the
national economy was doing very well and new capital expenditures were much higher.
By 1982, capital expenditures for
manufacturing in the Lansing MSA had increased substantially, but did not keep pace with the state's increase in
expenditures between 1963 and 1982.
Eaton County, on the
other hand, experienced a very small capital expenditure
increase and fell almost to the same proportion of the state's capital expenditure that it accounted for in 1958.
In
essence, Eaton County did not keep up with industrial growth
within the Lansing SMSA between 1963 and 1982, decreasing
from 27 percent of the region's capital expenditures in 1963
to eight percent in 1982.
It would appear that much of the
increase is located in Delta Township due to the Lansing Mall
and BOC Plant V.

-34-

�TABLE 16
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES IN MANUFACTURIOO FOR LANSIOO MSA AND
EATON COUNTY

Lansing MSA
($1,000,000)

Year

%

Eaton County
($1,000,000)

of State

%

of State

1958

$ 9.916

2.2

$ 0.962

0.2

1963

35.502

4.7

9.482

1. 2

1982

127.1

SOURCE:

U.S. Bureau of Census, Census of Manufacturers,
1958, 1963, 1982

3.6

10. O

0.3

Retail Sales - Retail sales is another important indicator of
business activity in an area.
In Table 17, the retail sales
for the Lansing MSA and Eaton County are shown.
TABLE 17
~

RETAIL SALES

,,,--._

($1,000)
I Increase
1967-82

County
Clinton

1967

Per
capita

Per

capita

74,U7

$1,483

$

1977

C,apita

ll4,306

$2,130

Per

Per

capita

Total C,apita

$ 151,303

$2,738

217.5

160.5

1982

$ 47,661

$1,051

Eaton

89,031

1,410

190,601

2,619

337,887

4,095

463,840

5,264

421.0

273.3

Ingham

486,702

1,978

666,457

2,525

1,000,941

3,691

1,274,798

4,692

161.9

137.2

Iooia

55,601

1,235

79,443

1,689

139,309

2,785

161,887

3,122

191.6

152.8

Total $678,995
Lansing-Fast
Lansing l\SA

$1,699

$1,010,628

$2,330

$1,592,443

$3,428

$2,051,828

$4,394

202.2

158.6

SClR:E:

$

1972

Per

Census of Retail Trade: Census of Population: Galle Associates F.st.urates

Table 17 shows that, relative to the other counties in the
Lansing-East
Lansing
MSA,
Eaton
County's
retail
sales
increased rather dramatically between 1967 and 1982, both in
terms of total sales and per capita sales.
In 1967, retail
sales in the County represented only 13 percent of the MSA's
total sales and by 1982 the County's portion of retail sales
in the four county area increased to 22. 6 percent.
Eaton
County's retail trade economy, therefore, is a strong factor
in the County's economic base.

-35-

~

�.
{
I

z
_.

,_-

Income Characteristics
Personal income is a key barometer of the economic condition
of an area.
Personal incomes determine the amount of money
available for retail expenditures, housing purchases and
local
investments.
These expenditures
and
investments
directly and
indirectly determine
the
amount of money
available for public facilities and services, primarily
through the local property tax base.
Table 18 depicts the
personal incomes in each of the Lansing-East Lansing MSA
counties and the state during the years 1979-1984.

TABLE 18
PERSONAL INCOME - 1979-1984
($1,000)

% of

County
Clinton

$

Eaton
Ingham
Ionia

Total
Lansing-East
Lansing M3A
Michigan
l -

SOURCE:

1979

M3A

% of
State

467,485

11.6

0.5

804,349

20.0

2,389,218

% of

%
% of Increase
State 1979-84

1984

M3A

657,049

11.6

0.6

40.5

0.9

1,137,792

20.1

1.0

41.5

59.2

2.8

3,335,266

59.0

2.9

39.6

369,455

9.2

0.4

519,648

9.2

0.5

40.7

4,030,507

100.0

4.7

5,649,755

100.0

4.9

40.2

100.0

$114,534,498

100.0

34.0

$85,447,655

$

u:x::a1 area personal incane; Personal incanes in all Great Lakes
Region; U.S. Deparbrent of Carmerce

According to Table 1'a , the counties in the Lansing-East
Lansing MSA increased at comparable rates over the six year
period.
The MSA as a whole saw a greater increase in personal incomes during that time than did the state.
Eaton
County experienced the highest growth rate among the four
counties and was the only one to increase, although slightly,
as a proportion of the MSA for personal incomes.

-36-

�Local Economy
An assessment of the local economy of Eaton Rapids provides
an insight into the role that the City plays in the Region.
The local economy will be analyzed according to major
employers, labor force, household income, retail trade and
assessed valuation.
Major Employers

l

Eaton Rapid's close proximity to Lansing creates a situation
whereby many residents living in and around Eaton Rapids are
employed in the Lansing area.
Many of these residents work
for the state or General Motors-B.O.C. Group, the Lansing
area's two major employers.
Within and near Eaton Rapids,
service and manufacturing industries provide the largest
employment base.
Major service employment includes Eaton
Rapids Public Schools (279 employees), Eaton Rapids Community
Hospital (180 employees) and the VFW Home (84 employees) and
the City of Eaton Rapids (46 employees). Major manufacturers
in and around Eaton Rapids consist of Eaton Technologies
Company
(250
employees),
Green Bay Food Company
(150
employees), Michigan Packaging Company (100 employees) and
Landalet Manufacturing Company (25 employees) and Dowding
Tool Products in Springport (40-45 employees).
In addition,
there are approximately 350 employees of retail businesses
within the City.
Labor Force
The 1980 labor force in the Eaton Rapids area consisted of
3,899 persons, including 1,187 in Eaton Rapids Township,
1,019 in Hamlin township and 1,817 in the City.
This represented 41 percent of the area's 1980 population.
The City's
labor force in 1980 also represented 40 percent of the City's
population, which was an increase over 1960 when 38 percent
of the City's population was in the labor force. The primary
reason for that increase in the labor force rate is the
number of women that have joined the labor force over the
last two decades.
In 1960, women made up 35 percent of the
City's labor force, compared to 44 percent in 1980. Also, in
1980, women comprised 41 percent of the areawide labor force
- that represented approximately 52 percent of all women over
16 years of age in the planning area.
The survey questionnaire results indicate that, within the
planning area, over 77 percent of all employment is full ~time
and the balance (23%) is part-time.
The proportion of fulltime to part-time employment ranges from 70 percent fulltime per 30 percent part-time in Eaton Rapid's Township, to
80 percent full-time per 20 percent part-time in the City of
Eaton Rapids.
The survey also showed that, on the average
1.56 persons per household were employed full-time and 1.18
persons per household were employed part-time in the planning
-37-

.i

�area, indicating that most households had at least two
employed people.
The questionnaire also showed that,
areawide, almost half (45%) of all full-time employed residents work in Lansing and over half of all part-time
employees work in Eaton Rapids.

1

•

'-·

Table 19 displays employment by industry for the City and two
townships for 1980.
While these figures do not obviously
reflect current conditions because of changes in economic
structure over the past nine years, they do indicate the
general importance of each sector in the local economy.
Table 19 shows that in 1980, nondurable goods manufacturing
was the predominant industry in which residents of the
planning area were employed.
Retail trade and educational
services were also major sectors of the area's economy. With
the substantial downturn in manufacturing, finance, insurance, real estate, construction and transportation and utilities employment between 1979 and 1987 at the regional level
(see Table 13), it is assumed that local employment in those
sectors has also decreased since 1979.
At the same time,
this Plan assumes that employment increases over the past
eight years in some sectors, particularly federal government
and wholesale trade, is reflected in those employment characteristics in the planning area.
Table 20 is an excerpt from the Tri County Region 1987
Overall Economic Development Program and displays projections
at the regional level in employment.
In general, regional
employment is expected to increase at the highest rate
between 1985 and 1990 and increase at a lower rate for each
five year period after 1990.
Manufacturing employment is
expected to continue to decrease, although between 1984 and
1987 it actually increased slightly, while other sectors
including retail trade and public sector employment are
expected to increase.
Eaton County and the Eaton Rapids
area, as a portion of the Region, and with many local residents employed in the Lansing Area, should also follow those
trends.

-38-

�,,,.-...._

TABLE 19

t!"-'

EMPLOYMENI' BY INDUSTRY - 1980
City of
Eaton
Rapids

Industry

% of
Paton
Twp.
Rapids
City
Total Township Total
% of

% of
% of
Hamlin Twp. Total Area
Township Total Area Total

9

0.5

58

4.9

49

5.5

116

3.0

60

3.3

59

4.9

40

4.5

159

4.1

131
457

7.2
25.2

36
371

3.0
31.2

45
276

5.0
30.8

212
1,104

5.4
28. 3

Transportation

42

2.3

37

3.1

32

3.6

111

2.8

Cannunication,
Utilities

17

0.9

20

1. 7

18

2.0

55

1. 4

Wholesale Trade

64

3.5

40

3.4

26

2.9

130

3.3

225

12.4

183

15.4

115

12.8

523

13.4

Finance, Insurance,
Real Estate

56

3.1

34

2.9

30

3.4

120

3.1

Business and Repair

67

3.7

36

3.0

11

1.2

114

2.9

Personal Entertainment 67

3.7

38

3.2

16

1.8

121

3.1

Health Services

173

9.5

74

6.2

57

6.4

304

7.8

Educational Services

236

13.0

83

7.0

72

8.0

391

10. 0

75

4.1

25

2.1

20

2.2

120

3.1

138

7.6

93

7.8

88

9.8

319

8.2

1,817

100.0

1,187

100.0

895

100.0

3,899

100.0

Agriculture, Forestry,
Fisheries
Caistruction
Manufacturing
- Durable Goods
- Nondurable Goods

Retail Trade

Other Professional
Services
Public Admi.n.
Total
SOURCE:

1980 Census - STF3A

. -39-

r'\

.......

�··-

►

~ -

·1)

' .

.---..

--

J

·-

. ···-~
t .

,.,,

. . .,
;I

7

l~

.;

~

--.1 ~

TABLE 20
TRI COUNTY REGION
PROJECTED POPULATION, INCOME AND EMPLOYMENT
1980-2005
Actual

1980

1985

1990

1995

2000

2005

406,811
-3.08

421,743
3.67

429,379
1.81

438,164
2.04

446,183
1.83

406,811
-3.08

405,522
-0.32

412,865
1.81

421,312
2.05

429,022
1.83

20.20

19.22
-4.85

19.21
-0.05

18.75
-2.39

18.00
-4.00

17.24
-4.22

35,436

33,072
-6.67

31,215
-5.62

28,018
-10.24

25,805
-7.90

23,360
-9.47

Retail
% change*

26,535

27,484
3.58

29,119
5.95

30,408
4.43

31,474
3.51

32,535
3.37

Government

48,267

43,371
-10.14

44,225
1.97

44,607
0.86

44,686
0 .18

44,762
0.17

88,552

88,711
0 .18

95,152
7.26

100,294
5.40

105,522
5.21

110,625
4.84

198,790

192,639
-3.09

199,710
3.67

203,326
1.81

207,486
2.05

211,283
1.83

Population

High

% change*

419,750

-

Estimated

Low

% change*
Total Personal
Income (1972 $)**
% change*
Employment
I

""'

0

I

Manufacturing

% change*

% change*
Other
% change*
Total

% change*

* % change from previous period
** hundred million dollars
Source :

Tri-County Regional Planning Commission, "Work Paper 116, Assumptions and
Equations for Employment Projectsions (1985-2005) ," July 1984.

·;
"

I

�Family Income
Family income is an important barometer of the economic well
being of an area.
Family income may be analyzed best in two
ways, via median household income data and by distribuiton by
income categories.
Median Family Income - Table 21 indicates 1970 and 1980
median family incomes of Eaton Rapids, surrounding townships,
Eaton County and the three county region.
TABLE 21
MEDIAN FAMILY INCOMES - 1970-1980

1970

1980

Eaton Rapids

$10,210

$21,727

112.8

Eaton Rapids Township

$10,633

$25,360

13-8.5

Hamlin Township

$ 9,420

$22,069

134.3

Eaton County

$11,423

$24,574

115.1

Reg ion

$11,213

$23,278

107.6

SOURCE:

%

Increase

Reg ion IIIA; 1980 Census STF3A

Table 21 indicates that the City's median family income was
the second lowest of the five jurisdictions in 1970 and by
1980 was the lowest, with Hamlin Township's median household
income surpassing the City's.
The Eaton Rapids area as a
whole, however, enjoyed a greater increase in median family
income levels over the 1970-1980 period than either the
County or Region.
It is also useful to compare median family incomes in Eaton
Rapids with such incomes in surrounding communities of comparable size. All of the cities in Table 22 had 1980 populations of between 4,000 and 8,500.

-41-

�TABLE 22
MEDIAN FAMILY INCOMES - COMPARABLE CITIES
Median Family Income
Poeulation
1980
1970
Eaton Rapids
St. Johns
Mason
Grand Ledge
Charlotte
Average
(unweighted)
SOURCE:

4,494
6,669
5,467
6,033
8,242

4,510
7,376
6,019
6,920
8,251

%

1970
$10,210
$11,357
$10,656
$11,175
$10,025
$10,685

1980
$21,727
$22,726
$21,744
$21,668
$19,599
$21,493

Increase
112.8
100.1
104.0
93.9
95.5
101.3

Tri County Regional Planning Commission;
1980 Census of Population

As displayed in Table 22, Eaton Rapids had the second lowest
median family income among comparable cities in 1970. By 1980,
however, the City had experienced the largest growth rate in
family incomes among these communities and actually had the
third highest median family income.
The survey questionnaire asked respondents for household income
ranges. The results indicate that, areawide the largest single
group of respondents earn between $10,000 to $20,000 annually.
In Hamlin Township and the City, 21 percent and 20.8 percent,
respectively, of the respondents had incomes in that range,
while only 15. 7 percent of Eaton Rapids Township residents
declared incomes in that range.
The City has the highest proportion of residents earning less than $10,000 and over 53 percent of its respondents say they have household income of less
than $30,000.
At the same time, only 37.3 percent of Eaton
Rapids Township respondents and 34.6 percent of Hamlin Township
residents report income of less than $30,000.
Assuming the
survey results are indicative of the entire population, residents of the City therefore tend to have lower incomes than
their counterparts in the townships.
That conclusion is also
verified in Table 21.
Retail Trade

Retail trade is an important segment of Eaton Rapids' economy,
although it has decreased over the past decade as a result of
substantial competition from suburban shopping malls in the
Lansing, Jackson and Battle Creek areas.
In 1984, the City commissioned a downtown redevelopment plan
that included an analysis of the City's retail market area.
In
the process of putting that plan together, a survey questionnaire was distributed to local residents in communities
-42-

�-'
··- i
I

considered to be part of the Eaton Rapids area of retail
influence.
Map 4 depicts the outline of that market area.
Most of the residents of that area do not do most of their
comparison (major appliances, automobiles, etc.) or even convenience (groceries, hardware, gasoline, etc. ) shopping in
Eaton Rapids.
These people may occasionally be drawn to
Eaton Rapids to make a particular major purchase or because
of a special sale.
This is also the same general area in
which the weekly shopping guide is distributed. Eaton Rapids
is, however, a major shopping area, especially for convenience i terns, for residents of the City and Eaton Rapids
and Hamlin Township.
The 1984 Market Study identified this
primary market area as the area that is covered by the Eaton
Rapids' postal zip code (see Map 5). The following analysis
of the Market Area's population is an except from the 1984
redevelopment plan:
Eaton Rapids Area Composition Analysis:
More than
half of the residents in the Eaton Rapids Zip Code
have above average or high spending potential.
About
one-quarter
have
below average
spending
potential, principally blue collar households of
average income. The following population categories
in the Eaton Rapids Zip Code merit special attention
in terms of marketing, sales and advertising.
Average Education, Two Income Households, Homes
Built in the 60's and 70's:
2,726 people or 21 percent of the Eaton Rapids Area are in this category.
These people have high purchasing potential and are
attracted by convenient (evening) store hours due to
the high incidence of two-paycheck households.
Young, Married Homeowners, with Larger Families and
Children:
3,854 people or 29.6 percent of the
Eaton Rapids area is in this category.
The median
age of adults in this group is 34.0 or 39.9 years
and between 49.0 and 50.4 percent of households have
children. In addition, 80 percent of this group are
homeowners.
Generally, this group of people is
attracted by events and sales promotions involving
children.
Although
they
have
above
average
purchasing potential, they generally seek wholesome,
inexpensive entertainment for the family. Moreover,
they are likely to attend church on at least a semiregular basis.
They are likely to have discretionary income for shopping at specialty stores and
crafts shops.
These people are often attracted by
good
general
merchandise
stores
where
school
supplies, hardware and similar items are available.
Based upon the consumer surveys, these people do

-43-

-,
I
)

�,--~

]

__,- 7

,r
i

f&lt;

I
I
I

:[

I

j :
!

:

.I.

i

l

I

~l

I
I

•

\

Lf
,·' ''

i,

i .

,I

:~
t -

I-96

,,

,
,
,

"'I
"'
~

CHARLOTTE,

,,
,
,

,

'

I
I

_ . _ _j~ '

I
I
I

I

POTTERVILLF.,

I

J
l

-- -

~

I

'--t.

''

\

~

,,,,

I

I

EATON
RAPIDS

l

L

- ·7

'\ \

1

MASON

I

\
\

''•

'
•ILESLIE
'

'

I

I

I

I

I
- - --I
I
l

I-94

JACKSON

l

I

I

l

Il-

l

r-N
rl

- - _____...,___ __l
en
:=&gt;

·1

'-------------------------------------EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

MAP 4
RETAIL MARKET AREA
EATON RAPIDS

Gove Associates Inc.

-44-

�r

•.

w

,,

i
.

i

~. aw.nn::a:a:a
I I

L'

_:::z

H

.:- -:--:;--L--....,.
4 ·' · ~~ 1

• L.. \'

~
g·:

;

.~

!'

•:

I

,. 1

I

·" "ii
· \•

~
~

,-== ,,
,...,

__

:-• ,·

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

MAP 5
POSTAL ZIP CODE AREA
EATON RAPIDS

(48827)

Gove Associates Inc.

-45==;
~

�i

;

'.

!' '

r ..,

j'
L.....e

I
l

.

most of their comparison shopping at regional malls
in the Lansing area.
There, sho[)ping, eating and
perhaps attending a movie, create an entire day of
entertainment.
Although many of these people will
visit downtown to feed the ducks or walk around the
island, there is not enough attraction to hold their
interest.
Events that entail par tic ipa tion . f ram
schools and contests involving children are typically most successful in changing these persons'
perceptions
about
downtown
and
in
ultimately
altering their shopping patterns.
Blue Collar Workers, with Children, Homeowners in
Rural Areas:
3,087 or 23. 7 percent of the Eaton
Rapids Zip Code is in this category.
Eight out of
every 10 of these households are homeowners and
about half have children.
In addition, more than 40
percent are blue collar households.
These people,
who have average purchasing potential, buy fewer
expensive goods than the previously described category and they have little discretionary income for
S[)ecialty store items,
including meat and fish
markets,
bakeries
and
expensive
crafts
shol?S.
Cultural events and art shows generally do not
attract this group of people. Rather, they are most
often attracted by events involving non-rock music,
affordable food and events involving children.
Table 23 compares the number and associated sales volumes for
different types of retail establishments in the City in 1963
and 1982.

-46-

�r

TABLE 23

•·
RETAIL ESTABLISHMENTS AND SALES
CITY OF EATON RAPIDS - 1963-1982
1963

1982
Sales
Estab. ($11000)

lisl'lllents

Sales
($11000)

Lunber, Building Materials,
Hardware

7

$ 640

4

General Merchandise Group

6

216

ll

Est.ab-

I Change
1963-1982
Estab.

Sales

$ 990

-42.9

54.7

l

(D)

-83.3

(D)

2,665

4

13,045

-63.6

389.5

3

1,850

2

(D)

-33.3

(Dl

Servic:e Stations

ll

938

5

6,089

-54.5

549.l

Apparel, .Accessories

6

368

2

CD)

-66. 7

(D)

Furniture, lbne Furnishings

l

2

(Dl

100.0

(Dl

Eating, Drinking Places

8

9

(D)

12.5

(Dl

Drug and Proprietary Stores

2

3

(Dl

50.0

(Dl

Miscellaneous Retail

9

10

(D)

11.l

(D)

Type

Food Stores
Auto Dealers
Gas

Total

(D)

284

(D)
Sil

42

64

-34.4

(Dl Data is suppressed or deleted due to small nUlliler of establishllents in that
category.

SOORCE:

Census of Retail Trade, Michigan; U.S. Departllent of Ccmnerce

In 1982, Eaton Rapids was ranked 144th in Michigan for
volume of retail sales for places of 2,500 or more inhabitants.
This put Eaton Rapids behind Alma, St. Johns,
Charlotte, Ionia, Albion and Mason and ahead of Grand Ledge
and DeWitt.
The City's total retail sales volume for that
year was $35 .1 million ( see Table 24).
When compared to
those communities in terms of retail sales per capita,
however, Eaton Rapids fares well, with $7,873 in sales per
person in 1982.
A high retail sales per capita does not
necessarily mean that the residents of Eaton Rapids spend
more in the City then residents of other areas do in their
own communities, but quite likely reflects the fact that
people living outside of Eaton Rapids spend a portion of
their income in Eaton Rapids.
That is, the City is a retail
center for residents living in outlying areas, even though
the number of retail establishments in the City decreased
between 1963 and 1982.

· -47-

•I

�. .:
'· .

TABLE 24
VOLUME OF RETAIL SALES
STATEWIDE RANKIN3 FOR PLACES OF 2,500 OR MORE
(Selected Areawide Cities of Comparable Size to Eaton Rapids)
1982

City
Alma
St. Johns
Charlotte
Ionia
Albion
Mason
Eaton Rapids

I''

SOURCE:

Sales
($1,000)
73,615
64,337
62,482
50,195
39,133
37,928
35,135

Rank

Estimated
1982
Population

Sales
Per
Capita

81
89
92
111
138
140
144

9,511
7,454
8,430
5,933
10,820
6,166
4,463

$7,740
8,631
7,412
8,462
3,617
6,151
7,873

U.S. Department of Commerce - 1982 Census of Retail
Trade

By 1984, the number of retail establishments in Eaton Rapids
consisted of 24 miscellaneous retail outlets, seven automotive establishments, three food and grocery stores and nine
restaurants and taverns for a total of 43 retail establishments, which is consistent with the 1982 Census of Retail
Trade tabulation.
In 1982, 345 paid employees were working
in retail establishments in the City.
The Eaton Rapids, Hamlin and Eaton Rapids township survey
responses
indicated a general dissatisfaction with the
current mix and lack of variety of stores in the downtown
area. This reaction may be based on a negative perception of
downtown Eaton Rapids compared to what is available in suburban shopping malls in Lansing and Jackson.
There appears to
be a concern among local residents regarding the rate of
turnover of new businesses in the downtown area.
This turnover can be attributed to a lack of business volume which in
turn is due to the inability of the downtown area to compete
effectively with newer, more modern retail facilities and
merchandising techniques in larger urban areas.
The key to
downtown Eaton Rapids success as a retail center will lie in
its ability to find and establish an appropriate 'niche' in
the area's retail and service market, which will require
structural (physical) alterations and improvements and new
or different organization and merchandising techniques.

-48-

�r

State Equalized Valuation
The State Equalized Valuation on real property is very important to a community since it is the basis for local property
tax revenues, one of the primary sources of revenue to meet
government expenses.
Equalized Value
Equalized value is a barometer of the economic activity
occurring in an area.
Equalized value reflects market value
of real property and hence a comparison of equalized values
of real property classifications over time will indicate the
relative strengths of the various types of property in the
community.
Table 25 displays the change in real property values and
number of parcels for each major property type for the
planning area over a 10 year period between 1978 and 1987
The table shows that, compared to surrounding townships, the
City's equalized valuation for all real property grew at a
relatively slow rate.
The townships also created a larger
number of new parcels than did the City.
Residential
valuation increased more than any other property class, commensurate with the rather large increase in the number of
residential parcels.
In 1978, the average residential parcel
had an assessed value of $8,478, or a true cash value of
$16,957.
By 1987, that average valuation increased to
$17,455, or a true cash value of $34,910.
Residential property valuation in Eaton Rapids Township increased from
$11,192 per property to $23,571 per parcel, and in Hamlin
Township the average assessment per residential parcel
increased from $6,562 to $20,000.
The number of commercial
parcels in the City increased only slightly over that 10 year
period.
In addition, only three commercial properties were
added to the township's tax rolls. Of all property classifications in the planning area, commercial parcels and commercial assessments showed the lowest rate of growth.
In 1978, the City's tax levy for municipal operations
(including general operation, parks and sanitary landfill)
was 13. 75 mills.
At
an assessed valuation of $17,116,400
for real property, the City collected $235,350 from its local
real property base, representing 10. 2 percent of the City's
total budget of $2,313,291.
In 1987, the City was operating
at 10.6557 mills (for general operations and parks) with a
real property assessed valuation of $34,975,600, capturing
$372,690 from real property taxes, or 8.4 percent of the
City's total budget of $4,447,620.
~

- -49-

�t

I

~Agriculture
No. of Parcels

I

I

l~i,-,-

EATON RAPIDS REAL PROPER'

$

-•

~r-

s-1-::,E

%

.... .,...,,

, .....

55.5
6

$

0
0

~: .:AL}_.:,.)

Paton Rapids 'lbwnship

Paton Ra_eids

lJl
0

J

_._... ...... _
-

J..., ,..,,,

.... ., .... ,

-

Vt·~~

ES

t ••

.i

'J

Hamlin 'lbwnshi_e

%

·--

... .,,_

-

... ., ... ,

'),,

·1

I

'lbtal Area
%
•--.-

_.,,

·-

.... .,..,,

_..........

%
...,_

$4,208.0
273

$8,792.2
281

108.9
2.9

$2,588.7
294

$8,220 . 0
313

217.5
6.5

$6,852.2
573

$17,012.2
594

148.3
3.7

Coomercial
No. of Parcels

3,210.1
173

5,256.1
177

63.7
2.3

287.4
14

414.6
15

44.3
7.1

84.5
20

282.1
22

233.0
10.0

3,582.0
207

5,952.8
214

66.2
3.4

Industrial
No. of Parcels

1,472.5
21

2,158.1
35

46.6
66.7

87.9
7

142.8
8

62.5
14.3

87 . 6
3

84.5
5

-3.5
67.0

1,648.0
31

2,385.4
48

44.7
54.8

Residential
No. of Parcels

12,378.4
1,460

27,561.5
1,579

122.7
8.2

7,946 . 0
710

22,840.4
969

187.4
36.5

3,510.6
535

14,179.9
409

303.9
32.5

23,835.0
2,705

64,581.8
3,257

171.0
20.4

23.8

16

114

31.0

Exempt No . of Parcels

Total
No. of Parcels
SOURCE:

63
$17,116.5
1,723

78
$34,975.7
1,869

IDcal Equalized Valuation Analysis

104.3
8.5

$12,529.3
1,020

27
$32,190.0
1,300

68.8

8

156.9 $6,271.4
860
27.5

9

$22,766.5
758

12.5
263.0
23.0

87
$35,917.2
3,603

$89,932.2
4,227

150.4
17.2

�r-

Table 26 depicts tax levies for cities of comparable ·size for
1978 and 1987. The S.E.V. in the table represents total real
and personal property.
Eaton Rapids has the lowest millage
of all the cities identified and experienced the largest
decrease in millage C-22.5%) between 1978 and 1987.
City
residents and businesses also paid the second lowest total
tax rate (58.27 mils), although the total millage increased
by almost 10 percent over the 10 year period - the third
highest growth rate among the cities analyzed.

~
- I

Table 27 displays the actual personal and real property tax
by those municipalities in 1978 and 1987.
In 1978, Eaton
Rapids had the second lowest property tax revenue and by
1987, the City's property tax revenue was the lowest of the
seven municipalities, due to the combination of its relatively low S.E.V. and tax rate.
TABLE 27
·CITY TAX LEVIES - 1978-1987
Estimated
Population
1987
1978

City

Taxes
1978

Taxes
1987

Taxes Population
%
%
Chan:Je Chan:Je
~

Charlotte

8,250

8,880

$ 943,478

$1,129,302

19.7

7.6

DeWitt

2,674

3,556

229,894

451,514

96. 4

33.0

Eaton Rapids

4,506

4,526

318,036

422,982

33.0

0.4

Grand I.ed:_;;e

6,743

7,258

522,686

930,101

77.9

7.6

Mason

5,909

6,534

397,431

816,879

105.5

10.6

Ionia

6,008

5,970

423,765

726,952

71.5

-0.6

St. Johns

7,235

7,649

845,526

1,118,348.8

32.3

5.7

SOURCE:

State Tax Cornnission, Michigan Departrrent of Treasury, 1978-1987
Gove Associates Populations Estimates; U.S. Census of Population,
1980; Population Estimates (1986) and Per capita Incone for
Selected Towns and Townships and Incorporated Places - U.S. Census
Bureau; Tri-county Ra;Jion Population Projections

-51-

)

;

�:· •--. -,
l, .

' ~

-.

~

,.i

-~:; ~ - .1

TABLE 26
TAX LEVY - CITIES OF COMPARABLE SIZE 1978-1987
'lttal. 'la&gt;es

S.E.V. ($1 100))

O:ll1ty '1aK Rite

City '1aK Rite

%

Ci

1978

Crerld:te 48,383.5

1987
73,188.7

%

1978

1987

51.3

5.50

6.75

9:h:ol '1aK Rite*

(MIIS)

(MIIS)

1978

1987

15.43 -~.9

32.86

38.~

1987

Z2.1

19.50

(MIIS)

%

%

1978

'llDeS ($1.!CXX))

Rite

(MIIS}

%

%

1978

1987

18.4

57.86

61.00

1978

1987

5.6

2,W.5

4,470.4

e

W.8

U:witt

15,429.2

34,598.7 124.2

5.70

5.00

1.8

14.~

13.(6 -12.4

41.45

47.39

14.3

62.(6

f6.24

6.8

957.4

2,291.9 139.4

Eatrn

23,129.8

39,695.0

71..6

5.50

6.75

Z2.1

13.75

1D.f6 -Z2.5

33.78

4l.87

21.0

53.03

58.27

9.9

l,~.6

2,ID.l

00.6

Grarrl
I..a:ge

:rl.692.0

55,862.7

82.0

5.50

6.75

Z2.1

17.03

16.65

-2.2

39.55

44.16

11.7

62.00

ol.%

8.8

l,~.4

3,774.0

~-1

Mi9:I1

:r&gt;, ro0.9

59,W.6

94.4

7.94

7.63

-3.9

12.92

13.f6

5.7

38.00

47.15

21.3

59.74

f6.44 11.2

1,837.7

4,092.7 l'Z2.8

Iroia

27,339.3

43,523.0

59.2

5.15

5.25

1.9

15.50

16.70

7.7

35.84

-:Il.32

39.0

47.49

59.27 24.8

1,298.5

2,579.7

~-i

St:. •.J::t-IB

44,501.4

78,625.7

76.7

5.70

5.00

1.8

19.00

14.Z2 -25.2

:ll.33

~-70

21.0

55.03

%.72

3.1

2,448.9

4,459.9

82.l

R:pi.d,

I
U1

N

I

*School TaX Rate includes local public school and internediate school district rates
SCXJOCE:

State

Tax

Conmission, Michigan I:epartnent of Treasury, 1978-1987

,. '

]

�....

Synopsis

l

Economic development is the key factor in community growth
and the quality of life available to local residents.
Employment,
family
income,
retail
sales
and
property
valuation, all reflect the viability of the areawide and the
community's economy.
Eaton Rapids' economy is healthy in terms of personal incomes
and employment opportunities available to local residents.
That condition is, however, tempered by the relatively lower
incomes of the City's residents when compared to the
surrounding townships and the fact that most residents of the
area are employed outside of the area, primarily in Lansing.
Total retail sales in Eaton Rapids are not at the level of
other ,comparably sized communities in the general Lansing
area and that is reflected in the slow growth in the total
number of new commercial establishments.
Retail sales per
capita, however, indicate that the City is still a viable
center of commercial activity for City residents and those
living outside the City.
Property valuations are increasing
at a slower rate than in the surrounding townships. However,
that is to be expected because of the relatively developed
character of the City compared to the amount of undeveloped
land in the surrounding townships. The city's relatively low
total tax levy, while not maximizing local revenues for
municipal capital improvements and operating costs, does
potentially help to create a more favorable business climate.
In essence, the City's economy is a mixed picture, with the
Lansing
area
providing
the
major
resource
for
local
employment, and with a continuing growth in new households in
the City's surrounding townships, which could potentially
help to increase retail activity in Eaton Rapids.
The
nucleus appears to be in place for expanded commercial activity in the future.

-53-

J

rr---- I1

~
'·

I

�r·

'; .'
I

:

·•

'

..

,.
l.

SECTION VI
!

'

-•

EXISTING LAND USE
AND NATURAL RESOURCES

�......

'

.,

EXISTIN'.i LAND USE AND NATURAL RESOURCES
Introduction
Any decisions that impact upon or change the physical development of the City must be done in the framework of existing
development.
Residential, commercial, ind us trial and other
land use patterns will greatly influence such decisions.
Of all the data required for the Comprehensive Development
Plan, the study of existing land use has perhaps the widest
variety of applications.
Following are some of the basic
applications of the analysis of existing land use that local
officials may find useful:
defines principal traffic generators.
can be used to estimate
municipal services.

existing

needs

for

shows areas and particular locations of incompatible land uses.
provides an understanding of physical features
and their relationship to the development of
various land uses.
can be used in the day-to-day
zoning and subdivision review.

problems

of

Along with the relationship of various land uses within the
planning area, the strengths and weaknesses of land use patterns will be analyzed. Major problems in land development,
including drainage, destruction of scenic areas, strip commercial development, and other natural and man-made problems
will be identified.
On the other hand, inherent positive
resources, such as woodlands and scenic areas, will also be
discussed.
I ..

In collecting information to be used in developing this
plan, the Planning Commission conducted a survey of all
structures and vacant lands within the City during the
summer of 1987. This information, combined with aerial photography from 1985, provides a composite of the planning
area's existing land use mix.
Natural Resources
The specific land uses of any area are often determined, in
a large part, by the existing natural resources.
This
includes factors such as topography, soil types, climate,

-54-

�vegetation, groundwater, and wildlife. Because Eaton Rapids
is a part of a much larger area - i.e., Eaton County and the
south-central region of the State - many of its features are
similar to the surrounding areas, and may be dealt with in
general terms (i.e. climate).
Other resources, such as
wetlands and forest areas, are much more specific to various
parts of the City, and can be mentioned independently.

I

The City of Eaton Rapids covers approximately three square
miles, with a fairly level topography throughout. The Grand
River runs through the center of the City, with Spring Brook
branching from it. The residential portions of the City are
located around a central business district, and there are
dispersed woodlots, wetlands, and agricultural areas toward
its periphery.
i

Soils

,I

An important consideration when determining the use of land
in most areas are the various soil types available.
Soils,
and their various associations, are related to geology, land
forms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area.
Each soil type and/or association has defined limitations
for specific types of development, and is, in turn,
reflected in the analysis and establishment of the land use
plan.
Eaton Rapids has eight different soil types, primarily consisting of the Boyer Series (approximately 50% of the City).
The following table describes each soil type and their limitations.
TABLE 28

SOILS IN EATON RAPIDS AND THEIR LIMITATIONS

Type

Boyer wamy Sand
Boyer Sandy IDain
Cohoctah Fine Sandy
IDain

Gilford Sandy IDain
Houghton Mucle
OWosso-Marlette Sandy
I.Dams

Shoals-Sloan
wasepi Sandy
SOURCE:

I.Dams

IDain

Shallow
Excavations

Dwellings
Without
Basements

Dwellings
With
Baserrents

Severe
Severe

M:rlerate
M:rlerate

Slight
Slight

Slight
M:rlerate

M:rlerate
M:rlerate

Severe
Severe
Severe

Severe
Severe
Severe

Severe
Severe
Severe

Severe
Severe
Severe

Severe
Severe
Severe

Slight
Severe
Severe

M:rlerate
Severe
Severe

Slight
Severe
Severe

M::xierate
Severe
Severe

M:rlerate
Severe
Severe

Soil Survey of Eaton County, Michigan
· -55-

IJ:Jcal
Small
Comercial Roads &amp;
Buildings Streets

�L

j

,. ... ..,
I

Of those soils listed, the Boyer series is generally best for
residential and commercial development.
This is consistent
with much of the existing land use in the City, as the residential and commercial areas are concentrated primarily on
the Boyer soils.
Most other areas are suitable only for
agriculture.
Although some building on these soils may be
possible, it generally is restricted to residential developments in limited areas.
'·; .

Topography

L
'l. .
..

(

The topography of the City is representative of the county
and surrounding areas in general.
The relatively flat land
varies only from a low point of 871 feet above sea level at
Main and State Streets, to a high of 928 feet above sea level
in the northwest corner of the City (Kemler and Dexter
Roads).
Generally, elevations range around 880 to 900 feet
above sea level. The lower elevations tend to be centralized
in the City, primarily where the Grand River and Spring Brook
intersect to form the Central Business District Island. This
is also the area of highest commercial density.
Moving outward toward the periphery produces higher elevations, but
also larger open areas used for residential and agriculture
purposes.
Some quarrying and mining, along with wetland
areas, do exist on the west side of the City, resulting in
lower elevations in these locations.
Water

r

'I
j

•

The Grand River enters the City from the southeast (Hamlin
Township), and flows toward Lansing to the northeast (Eaton
Rapids Township).
The river runs through the City from the
south to the north, on the eastern side of the Central
Business District. Spring Brook, which is a tributary of the
Grand River, branches off east of North Main Street toward
the southwest.
This effectively leaves a portion of the
Central Business District on an island surrounded by Spring
Brook on the north and the west, the Grand River on the east,
and a channel between the two on the south. The Grand River
has two islands east of the Central Business District, the
largest (Island Park) which acts as a focal point in the City
and a linkage to the downtown.
Map 6 is a copy of the Flood Insurance Rate Map for the City
(October, 1982).
Shown on the map are areas containing the
100 and 150 year flood boundaries.
Primarily, flooding in
the Grand River is during the winter and spring, although
heavy summer thunderstorms may also cause flooding.

I-,

-56-

�~

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
MAP 6
100 YEAR FLOOD AREA
CITY OF EATON RAPIDS

Gove Associates Inc.

-57-

�Three dams, which act as flood protection measures and
electrical generation backwater retension, are located
Grand River.
Two are positioned below the Knight
Bridge and impound water for Island Park.
The third
at State Street, and a diversion canal to Spring Brook
a hydroelectric plant in the City.

hydroin the
Street
dam is
serves

I _

r-•
1

;I

-.

't

-f

•

L.'

One mile southeast of Eaton Rapids is the Smithville Dam,
which is also used for hydroelectric generation.
This facility is the main source of flood control for the City, while
only one of the smaller dams in the City can be opened to
send water downstream in case of severe high water.
The following zones apply to the Flood Insurance Rate Map 6
(Flood Insurance Study, City of Eaton Rapids).
ZONE

EXPLANATION

A

Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and
flood hazard factors not determined.

AD

Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths are
between one Cl) and three (3) feet; average depths
of inundation are shown, but no flood hazard factors
are determined.

AH

Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths are
between one Cl) and three (3) feet; base flood
elevations are shown, but no flood hazard factors
are determined.

A-l-A30

Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and
flood hazard factors determined.

A99

Areas of 100-year flood to be protected by flood
protection system under construction; base flood
elevations and flood hazard factors not determined.

B

Areas between limits of the 100-year flood and 500year flood; or certain areas subject to 100-year
flooding with average depths less than one (1) foot
or where the contributing drainage area is less than
one square mile; or areas protected by leaves from
the base flood.
(Medium shading)

C

Areas of minimal flooding.

-58-

(No shading)

�Climate

Because Eaton Rapids is inland within the State, the influence of the Great Lakes' is small.
Lake Michigan's most
noticeable influence is increased cloudiness, which moderates
the minimum temperature during cold spells late in the fall
and early in the winter.
The City's climate is continental.
Daily, seasonal, and annual temperature changes recorded at
weather stations in the county (e.g. at Charlotte) are larger
than those recorded at stations at a similar latitude near
the Great Lakes.
Because the day-to-day weather is controlled largely by the movement of pressure systems across
the nation, prolonged periods of hot, humid weather in
summer, and extreme cold in winter, are seldom experienced.
Temperatures will range from an average daily low of 14°F in
January, to 84 °F in July.
The annual average in the County
is 58.8°F for a high, and 36.4°F for a low.
Precipitation averages approximately
majority falling in June (almost 4").

32"

a

year,

with

the

Eaton Rapids will also receive approximately 68 days a year
which have at least one inch or more of snow cover.
Vegetation

When areas around Eaton Rapids were first settled, lumbering
was second in importance to farming.
Several forest types
occurred on soils of certain similar characteristics.
The
moderately coarse textured, well drained soils - such as the
Boyer - supported oak-hickory type forests that locally included beech, sugar maple, elm, ash, and walnut.
The finer
textured, well drained and moderately well drained soils such as Owosso-Marlette - supported maple-beech type forests.
Another hardwood forest type occurred on the somewhat poorly
drained, and very poorly drained mineral soils such as
Gil£ ord.
Here, elm, ash, so£ t maple, hickory, and swamp
white oak have been the dominant species.
Only a few woodlots of second growth timber remain, mostly on
the poorly drained mineral soils.
This second growth timber
is about the same as the original vegetation.
Many areas
which have been pastured support a thorny undergrowth.
The tree coverage which does exist in the City is relatively
scattered.
The largest groupings occur in the north along
the City boundaries, in the southeast at the Grand River as
it comes into the City from Hamlin Township, and in the
southwest at the Spring Brook-Hobart Drain area and extending
up into the central-western portion of the City.

-59-

·,I

�Land Use Classifications

r
\

,

A classification of land uses is necessary to insure a
common understanding of the material presented.
Land use
can be grouped into major categories such as residential,
commercial, industrial, open land uses and others. However,
these categories are not precise enough for planning purposes
and further division of the major categories is necessary.
The following is a description of the various land use
classifications used in this plan.
Residential
This indicates an area in which dwellings with their
accessory buildings occupy the major portion of the land and
including the following subcategories:
Single-Family Residential - An area in which a singlefamily dwelling unit and its accessory buildings are
located.
Duplex - A building containing two separate
quarters for occupancy by two households.

living

Multiple-Family - An area in which there are three or
more dwelling units per residential structure or lot,
consisting primarily of apartments.
Mobile Homes - Year-round or seasonal mobile homes.
Commercial
These uses are land areas, with or without structures, where
goods are distributed or personal business services are provided, including the retail sale of goods and services to
local residents and highway oriented uses.
Offices
This category would include such uses as professional
offices, real estate offices, banks and insurance companies.
Public and Quasi-Public
Land areas and facilities which are available to or used by
all of the people within a particular service area, such as
schools, libraries and government buildings, are in this
category. Also included in this classification are areas and
buildings which are used by a limited number of persons with
particular interest and nonprofit organizations.
They are
uses such as churches, clubs and other activities.

-60-

�Recreation and Open Space
.I

This category includes land areas with or without structures
that cater to the recreation needs of the public.
Such land
uses include parks, recreation areas and similar uses.

I

_}

Warehousing and Storage
This classification applies to land areas which are used for
the open storage of materials, such as concrete block, coal,
junk cars or other waste materials, or enclosed storage
areas, such as storehouses, depots or other warehousing.
Manufacturing and Utility Plants
Manufacturing includes land areas with or without buildings
where new or semif inished material is processed, fabricated
and/or manufactured.
Utilities include both public and private uses for providing general utility services, such as
electric power stations, gas regulator stations and other
facilities of this nature.
Transportation
This category is comprised of all dedicated surface rightsof-way, includin~ highways and railroads, which are used for
the movement of people and goods and parking areas.
Agricultural Land
This classification is applied principally to land areas used
for crop land, permanent pasture land and land lying fallow
but which indicates cultivation at an earlier date.
Due to
the variations in the agricultural practices of farmers in
terms of land cultivation, this classification is flexible
for specific parcels.
Vacant Land
Vacant land is land not used for any purpose heretofore
listed in built-up areas or undeveloped portions of the
planning area and includes scrub areas and vacant lots within
built-up subdivisions.

-61-

'
.I

�Analysis of Land Use Patterns

''

...

The land use categories as defined above were used in mapping
the results of the field survey as shown on Map 7.
The map
is a generalization of the various patterns of land use
within the City as of the summer of 1987. The purpose of the
map is not to show every detail of development within the
area.
Instead, land uses that display similar characteristics are grouped into categories.
Patterns are thus
discernible and analysis is made possible.
An acreage summary of the land uses is presented in Table 29.
During
the _summer of 1987, the Eaton Rapids Planning
Commission conducted a "windshield" survey of land uses
within the City.
The purpose of that survey was to obtain a
current inventory of the type, location and condition of the
primary structures on each lot,
excluding the Central
Business District.
The Central Business District was
excluded, as recent data on the CBD was available from other
sources.
Using vehicles, the Planning Commission surveyed structures
in all other sectors of the City, denoting the use of primary
structure
(residential,
commercial,
office,
industrial,
church, etc.), the number of stories in that structure and
the general condition (good, deteriorated or dilapidated) of
the structure.
This data was then transferred from field
maps to a composite base map to establish a comprehensive
overview of existing land uses.
Map 2 reflects the results
of this survey relative to structural condition.
The composite base map was compared to a 1985 aerial photograph of
the City and adjusted accordingly.
The result is the
existing land use map (Map 7).
The procedure used on conducting the land use survey is identified in more detail in
Appendix A.

-62-

�I'.:"""\ ;

TABLE 29
EXISTIOO LAND USE
EATON RAPIDS, MICHIGAN - 1967, 1987
Acreage
land Use
Residential
Single-Family
Multiple Residential

1967

1987

332

487

16.0

23.5

330*

469

13.5

22.6

2

17

0.1

0.8

Duplex
Canrercial
Office
Public and Quasi-Public

Percent of Total
1967
1987

1

0.01

31

38

1.5

1.8

2

7

0.1

0.3

112

134*

5.4

7.9

Recreation and Open Space

22

54

1.1

1.2

warehousing and Storage

17

19

0.9

0.9

Manufacturing

44

50

2.1

2.4

Transportation

229

229

11.0

11.1

1,198

969

58.0

46.8

water

85

85

4.1

4.1

Total

2,072

2,072

100.0

100.0

Agriculture an Vacant

*Includes duplex units.
**Includes 58.7 acres general public/semi-public, 30.l acres schools,
42.4 acres cemetery, 2.6 acres public parking.

SOURCE:

1969 Eaton Rapids Comprehensive Plan;
Gove Associates Inc. Estimates (1987)

-63-

.

,-__

:

�J

~)
Ii\•

~

&gt;

•

&gt;

',,~.

&gt;

•
&gt;

&gt;

"
&gt;

eu

w

~~ ,
,;,;/

I I

1)'
,

1
. . F,; ~1 J.il•t&gt;=::tcu::

I

• •• -, I

~--1

1

~

..

•IL.~~iflll~~~ll
lf~;~
I,I~i•~n

- " 'CC[
. - . . •• .
~
I i rmr-r,.rrr:rrr--i

L";-··, ...r.,-

I
!a&amp;~ · ·.
~~1/U'.~..; ~!-,i. ;~C~
I

-i
~ ffl !

-,,,n,-,,-, ,-,,,:,--,-·11.--,
'--- • ~
r ·«.f'
,--_
~~~~~

. ·,.· --

.

.

~

□

• ~- •

\

=-~•.• ., '/•,

~t...,,:-w~~ifm~
r~~ . -~- ~~- · --~;.
' -:71#Jlfl~E(~rl_L :~,;..~
,.,

.,.. • . ·,
~ 1• .

'..J~
.• - - - - ~
~;

, j;)' . ,

ti •

•

1

-

'i='i!i~
I~ : •· ': • ...

E-~
,.if/

~

;~~

I •

/ifJil "

,-.- '-

&gt;

I

I~•..,;•
~

•. ej'i•fro•.. :&gt;'.!
I,

.

J; •'·• ...:I t.o1.
:':,.;;; ',;..~., er

,; .

•~

~-.

-

:==:~

.

.

6

-~

&gt;: . _. ..·.~- ,~. ,. ~~ ..

'&lt;.

:•

•

·!,

'. . '

.---·'-:- _;
•

. .,

6

••

'•..

--..-.,.~-

..

.

•

'•

//

~•

'

1'/;l~!I#j,._..

ISi

.i,I:

a,

,&gt;.,__

t----------,

:~·u·.
l ~1t1·~~-: □ !~ I . .
.·••:!!
'·-)~·• &amp;
:f

s

I

IIElil! ~~ !~~~;-1h~·:r:.--cp

- ' ·

I

. ··

"', ,,

i -,mTwo•

- •• - , •

""

;,...-or

..
✓-

I

/

..•

N

!
.. .. 0)

I

,.ft" t'',.~ • I
'

ij

~I

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
I
O'I
~

I

MAP 7
EXISTING LAND USE
EATON RAPIDS

legend

□

Residential
Retail Cannercial

~ W:lrehouse

Q School

lS)

Office

l!l!llllffiPublic Facility

T

Manufacturing

·~·f.'~.....~
{!iJ.':t;.~'&lt;t
Park/Recreation
t
.,~.'-') \_r .., ,. ~ ~"

~ Off-Street Parking
i::o;o::o::o::o:o:;

..

•

:::::::;:::::::
!bsp1 tal
•,.o,.o,..o,..o.,o ,. o...,o

@

I

Gove Associates Inc.

�Residential
Single-Family Residential
I

\

•

'

i ;

Within Eaton Rapids, 469 acres or 22.6 percent of the City's
area is devoted to single-family use ( see Map 8).
Three
distinct areas of single-family use are discernible.
One
area is in the northwest part of the City. Another is to the
south of Spring Brook and to the west of the Grand River.
The third area is to the east of the Grand River.
The first residential area is divided by major highways, M-99
and M-50.
This has fragmented residential development so
that a cohesive neighborhood has not developed.
Mixing of
commercial and industrial land uses in this area has tended
to downgrade single-family development.
Some single-family
homes within this area are substandard.

'
'

..

'

The second residential area is also divided by several major
transportation arteries.
South Main Street (M-50 and M-99)
and Water Street (M-188) create an east-west division.
Furthermore, the prevalence of small blocks with alleys
causes a disproportionally large acreage in transportation
facilities.
A mixture of land uses occurs in Area II.
Commercial uses
have located along South Main Street and warehousing and
storage has located along the former railroad. As in Area I,
some single-family homes are substandard and this area will
become more deteriorated unless corrective measures are
taken. In the far southwest portion of Area II, new residential areas have developed.
The third area, on the east side of the Grand River, is not
fragmented by transportation arteries.
While State Street
di vi des the area into north and south, it also acts as a
collector street for residential development.
Single-family
development to the north of State Street represents early
residential development in Eaton Rapids.
Most of the single
family homes in this area are basically in sound condition,
with a few units showing signs of deterioration. A number of
multiple family complexes are located in the area.
Property
on the City's eastern boundary north of State Street has
recently been subdivided and is projected to be the area
where most new residential development will occur in the near
future.

•

The area south of State Street has both old and new development. Overall, this section of the City has the highest rate
of housing in good condition .

-65-

�•-•-•.:.....•-•-•~--•-•

...,,,..---.~-====-==~~L

AREA
111

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

MAP 8
RESIDENTIAL NEIGHBORHOODS
EATON RAPIDS

Gove Associates Inc.

-66-

�Multiple Residential

'

,

Land area devoted to multiple family housing has increased
substantially from two acres to 17 acres between 1967 and
1987.
The greatest concentration of such development is in
Area III, adjacent to State Street. The high cost of housing
coupled with changing lifestyles will create a more intense
demand for multiple family housing, consisting of both condominium units and rental apartments.

i .•
t,j __

Other Residential

I

•

t .

Other residential property consists of mobile homes and
duplexes.
There are an estimated 28 mobile homes in the
City, encompassing a total of about five acres. The majority
of these units are located within one mobile home park. Most
of the City's duplexes are concentrated in Area I and encompass one or two acres of land.
Most of the units are older
and located next to single-family housing. In addition, nine
new duplex units have recently been built in Area III.
Mobile homes and duplexes are not uses that conflict directly
with single-family housing although they are not necessarily
always compatible with single-family housing.
By law,
however, mobile homes are allowed to be located in 'stickbuil t' single-family areas.
A 148-uni t Manufactured Home
Community is being planned on Hyatt Street in the southwest
part of the City.
Commercial
These uses in the City represent about 38 acres, an increase
of seven acres over 1967.
Two separate types of commercial
development exist and will be discussed individually.
Central Business District
This is the core area of the City and encompasses about five
acres.
Retail stores, offices, entertainment and dining
spots and service establishments are congregated in one location.
The past several decades have witnessed the general
decline of central business districts due primarily to obsolescence,
traffic congestion,
and shopping center competition.
Eaton Rapids' CBD is no exception to the above
problem.
Obsolesence of the CBD is apparent.
The buildings
are old and sometimes not cared for, especially the rear of
the stores.
The back of stores becomes important when
Customer parking is to the rear of buildings as it is in
Eaton Rapids.
Vehicular traffic has ready access to the CBD by Main Street
(M-99, M-50).
Parking as well as movement of vehicles are
primary considerations in a CBD. Parking is essential.
The

-67-

�west side of Main Street has parking lots behind the stores
fronting on Main Street, as well as a parking lot off of Hall
Street. The east side of Main Street has less parking behind
stores.
Also, the loading and unloading of trucks may cause
a problem on the east side of Main Street since alleys are
narrow and parking does not abut all stores.
The Eaton Rapids CBD has one major physical advantage that up
to the present has been largely ignored.
This natural asset
is water.
The Central Business District is virtually an
island.
The only effort to attract shoppers to the CBD has
been the redesign and landscaping on Hamlin Street between
Main Street and Island Park.
For the most part, businesses
have turned their back to the water and fronted onto Main
Street.
Island Park provides an excellent beginning in developing a scenic area in conjunction with the CBD.
Further
emphasis should be placed on integrating existing and potential park areas with the CBD.
There is currently an effort
underway to redevelop the block north of Knight Street,
including the old Horner property on the corner of Main and
Canal as a central market place emphasizing the river.
Done
properly, the redevelopment can act as a major emphasis for
commercial growth downtown.
Non CBD Commerical
In every city, there are commercial uses that are not
located in the Central Business District. These uses include
gas stations, motels, drive-in eating establishments, and
similar commercial uses that rely on passing motorists as
their customers and locate along major highways.
Such uses
are found along South Main Street, Dexter Road, and Michigan
Street Call state trunklines).
Unless properly controlled, commercial developments along
major highways can create several problems.
These commercial
establishments cause turning movements onto and off the highway.
Such movements conflict with through traffic, slowing
the traffic and creating a safety hazard.
Service roads and
limitation of driveway permits would minimize this problem.
If not properly controlled, such commercial development can
have a depressing effect on contiguous residential land.
Adequate buffering from residential development is necessary.
Warehousing and Storage
This land use is primarily located in relation to industries
and the abandoned Penn Central Rail Line.
Approximately 19
acres are devoted to such use.
When storage is located along
with industry, the effect upon the remainder of the community
is negligible.
However, when warehousing and storage mixes

-68-

&gt;

;
I

,I

�with residential property, as it does in Eaton Rapids,
particularly in Area I, then it causes a deteriorating
influence
on
residential
homes.
To
prevent
further
deterioration, warehousing and storage should be removed and
relocated in the City's Industrial Park, or buffered from
residential areas.
Greenbelts or ornamental fencing should
be provided to protect the property values of surrounding
residential development.
Manufacturing and Utility Plants

I ,

l.

The City of Eaton Rapids has 50 acres in industrial use, an
additional 6 acres over 1967. The older manufacturing plants
have located in the southern portion of the City near the
former Penn Central Railroad and new industrial park.
The
City's industrial park encompasses a total area of 23 .16
acres adjacent to Hamman Road. The site contains an improved
entrance road, water and electric service.
Approximately
nine acres are developed with existing ind us tries, leaving
almost 14 one-half acres available for future development.
Whenever an industrial area is contiguous to a residential
area, an adequate buffer strip, maintained by the industry,
should be provided.
This also applies to utility transformers in residential areas.
Several manufacturing plants
are located adjacent to residential subdivisions.
Plant
traffic uses residential streets as access to the plant and
this produces a large volume of traffic on residential
streets, creating a traffic hazard.
Transportation

r.

I

I "

Approximately 229 acres or 11 percent of the City's land area
is in transportation use. Transportation uses demand a large
proportion of the land area, and if not properly planned, the
transportation system can consume valuable land needlessly.
The road rights-of-way are the largest single land use in the
transportation category.
Those areas in Eaton Rapids that
were developed around the turn of the century have a high
proportion of their area in roads and alleys.
The newer
residential areas have larger blocks with less of their area
in streets and alleys in these areas have been eliminated.
Three state highways go through the City.
While the poor
condition of M-99 north of the CBD is serious, the Michigan
Department of Transportation is currently realigning M-99 and
M-50 at the corner of Canal and Main Streets to provide a
safer intersection. M-99 from this intersection to the north
City limits is also being widened to three lanes.

-69-

�The Grand River, Spring Brook, and the channel connecting
them, present a natural barrier to transportation.
To unify
Eaton Rapids, bridges had to be constructed. Two bridges for
vehicular traffic currently cross the Grand River and connect
residential development on the east side of the River to the
CBD and Main Street on the west side of the River.
An additional bridge should be constructed across the Grand River
north of the CBD to access the residential areas east of the
Grand River.
Office
Approximately seven acres are devoted to office use, compared
to two acres in 1967.
The largest share of this total is in
the CBD and constitutes bank, insurance and professional
offices.
Office uses are becoming increasingly important to
CBD's since offices attract workers who use the various services in the CBD. Other offices in the City are used in connection with industrial firms and the City's Municipal
offices are located in one building on the corner of Hamlin
and Main Streets.
Public and Quasi-Public
These uses represent 7. 9 percent of the City's area or 164
acres.
The largest uses are the sewage treatment plant, a
cemetery and schools.
There are seven churches in the City,
covering about 14 acres, with property ranging in area from
6,600 square feet to 10 acres. Public uses, such as schools,
the hospital, and municipal offices are further analyzed as
to adequacy,
location and site size in the Community
Facilities Services Section.
Churches have historically located wherever church officials
desired.
In Eaton Rapids most churches are located on local
streets in residential areas.
Several nuisance factors can
be associated with church development. For example, churches
generate traffic, especially on Sunday and off-street parking
often is inadequate with overflow of parking on Sunday
generally occurring on local streets.
City officials should
insure that church sites are large enough to provide for adequate off-street parking.
Recreation and Open Space
Such land area is essential to a community.
In the City of
Eaton Rapids about 54 acres are devoted to such use.
(This
does not include recreation uses associated with schools).

-70-

.J

�.,...

The other developed recreation area is the old athletic field
north of Spring Brook.
This field is low and marshy and
seems best utilized for recreation space.
In addition, the
marshy areas along the Grand River in the northern part of the
City and other wet, lowland areas could become recreation
space.

l

Open land between McArthur River Drive and the Grand River
acts as a scenic greenbelt.
Similar greenbelt space should
be encouraged as much as possible on both sides of the river.

l '

Vacant Land
'
L

Nine hundred sixty-nine acres are in vacant, water or agricultural use.
While a small amount of this land is used for
agricultural purposes, it can be expected that, with rising
property values, agriculture will not long remain a land use
within the City.
Very little land is forested.
Wherever stands of trees do
-exist, an effort should be made to preserve them as woodland
provides a refreshing contrast to open land.
Also, much of
the City's area, (85 acres), is water.
The natural beauty
and recreation value of the river has not been fully
realized.
Concentrated efforts should be made to integrate
water resources with urban development in Eaton Rapids.

Synopsis

l '

The City of Eaton Rapids may be divided into three distinct
single-family residential areas, one on the north and northwest of the Central Business District, one to the south and
one to the east.
The first two areas evidence a mixture of
land uses with commercial and industrial uses interspersed
with
the
residences;
the
third area
has
a
few nonresidentially related uses and it contains the bulk of the
City's
newer
subdivisions.
Apartment
development
is
increasing, especially in the eastern portion of the City.
The majority of new residential development is expected to
take place in this area.
The bulk of the commercial and office uses are concentrated
in the Central Business District, which is in need of
substantial revitalization to promote a restructuring of its
niche in the greater Lansing market.
The unique position of
the downtown surrounded by water offers a substantial potential as an attractive shopping area.
One hundred eighty-eight acres are devoted to public, semipublic, recreation and open space uses.
They are discussed
in the Community Facilities Study.

-71-

�Properties bordering the southern segments of Main Street
(M-99) are in the process of making the transition from residential to commercial land use, creating potential traffic
problems and contributing further to the decline of business
in the CBD. Proper designation of land use in this area is a
key component of future land use planning.

I
-,

i
I

warehousing and manufacturing uses are located adjacent to
the Central Business District of the City, and on the south
side of the City within residential areas.
The development
of the City's new industrial park on Kinneville Road is a
step in the right direction to concentrate industries in an
appropriately designed area.
Almost half of the City is still vacant, particularly along
the northern and eastern perimeters, providing an excellent
opportunity to plan for the future development of the City.
A large portion of vacant land in the western part of the
City is in low lying topography, and susceptible to 100 year
flooding.
These areas should be set aside for open space or
recreation.

-72-

�I

•

I

I

'
~·-.,

''I

.

t, .;,
t .

r ,
I

l

.

-

'

i

'l ',•
I '

!~

,..
'

'

SECTION VII
STREETS AND ROADS ANALYSIS

�, ....

STREETS AND ROADS ANALYSIS

Existing Conditions
:
I

:

'

.

{
l

The primary road in Eaton Rapids is Main Street (M-50/M-99)
which bisects the commercial core of the downtown.
On the
north, the street turns west toward Charlotte (becoming
Dexter/M-50),
and
northeast
toward
Lansing
(Canal;
Michigan/M-99).
South of the Central Business District,
Water
Street
( M-18 8)
intersects
with Main
Street and
Spicerville Highway and Kinneville Road intersect at the
south end of the City.
The remainder of the roads are primarily local streets which serve residential neighborhoods.
State Street is a primary road on the east side.
Road Classifications

The network of streets in Eaton Rapids may be defined in a
functional hierarchy, by evaluating the size and use of the
road, and the land uses it serves. This includes:
'

\

.

Arterial (e.g. M-99):
Relatively high capacity
roads which provide unity throughout a contiguous
urban area; medium speed/capacity roads for intracommunity travel as well as access to rest of
county-wide arterial highway system.
Should have
minor access control and channelized intersection.
Four miles of arterial roads exist within Eaton
Rapids.
Collector
(e.g.
State
St.):
Relatively
low
speed/low volume street, typically two lanes, for
circulation within and between neighborhoods.
The
roads serve generally short trips and are meant to
collect trips from local streets and distribute
them to the arterial network.
The City currently
contains 6.7 miles of collector streets.
I

•

Local Streets (e.g. Leonard St. ) :
Low speed/low
volume
roads
which
provide direct
access
to
abutting land uses.
Nonconducive to through traffic.
There are currently 19.95 miles of local
streets in the City.
It should be noted that M-50, M-99,
Michigan/Main,
and
Water
Streets,
designated as State trunklines.

-73-

and M-188 (Dexter,
respectively),
are

�:s

2

'"

. I

A

I1

I

l
I

I

I

I
1-CITY OF

EATON RAPlbS
EATON COUNTY, MICHIGAN

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
legend
MAP 9
STREET CLASSIFICATIONS

ARTERIAL
'11.Z ZZZ ZZZZZ COLLECTOR

@

·LOCAL
-74-

Gove Associates Inc.

J

�i. ...;.

Daily Traffic Volumes
Exact 24-hour traffic counts in Eaton Rapids have been somewhat sporadic over the years, as shown on the next page.
However, from this we can determine where the majority of
traffic is entering and/or leaving the City.
This breaks
down as:

i..:

.
;

.
J.

Michigan Street (M-99)
South Main Street (M-50/M-99)
Dexter Road (M-50)
Spicerville Highway
Water Street (M-188)

40%
28%

21%
7%
4%

Evidently, the Lansing area on the north and Charlotte on
the west exhibit the greatest influence on the City of Eaton
Rapids. This primarily reflects individuals traveling to and
from work, and shopping in the other communities.
Map 10
identifies traffic counts in different years, primarily along
Main Street .
As shown on Table 30, vehicular traffic on major streets
have, in general, increased slightly over the part 10-15
years.
The most noticeable increase has occurred on Brook Street and
on Main Street just north of Hamlin.
This would tend to
indicate that a greater amount of activity (new construction,
more jobs and other attractions) have occurred on the western
side of the City.
However, it is likely that this has
levelled off in the past five years, and more traffic is and will be - generated on the eastern side of the City. New
developments in this location and a general tendency for the
City to expand in an eastern direction may increase traffic
volumes on all streets in this area, although not by a significant amount.
With the redevelooment of the Old Horner
Woolen Mill site, additional traff i"c will be added to the
Canal/Main street area which is already one of the highest
traffic volume areas in the City.
Sidewalks, Curb and Gutter
Except for approximately 2,000 linear feet,
the City's
streets are essentially paved or seal-coated.
Of the
approximately 31 miles of streets within the City, approximately 47 percent are improved with curb and gutter.
These
are primarily located within the older, more established portion of the City, including the Central Business District,
the residential area between North River Street and East
Street, and north of, and along, Dexter Street, as well as
residential areas south of King Street between Water Street

-75-

�-

I
►

~

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

MAP 10

TRAFFIC COUNTS

Gove Associates Inc.

-76-

�TABLE 30
'

'

VEHICULAR TRAFFIC ON MAJOR STREETS

! ;
' ,

Vehicle
Count for
24 Hr. Period

\'.'

Vehicle
Count for
24 Hr. Period

Year
Count
Taken*

%

Charge/Yr

3,810

1973

4,362

1986

984

1975

1,447

1982

4.6

7,003

1973

9,695

1986

2.1

11,877

1973

14,596

1986

1.4

1,913

1977

1,828

1982

-.89

M:iin/Hamlin

lU,546

1977

13,015

1982

3.8

M:iin/Broa.d

13,783

1973

15,139

1986

.69

M:iin/W. Plain

11,396

1973

11,852

1983

.16

1,171

1973

1,112

1986

-.39

71U

1974

89Y

1986

1.8

' .

Dexter Road

r~.

Brook Street

(

Year
Count
Taken*

.97

.

M:iin/Dexter
.~·

M:iin/Sprin;; Brook

I·.,

,

: ....

W. Hamlin

W3.ter/W.

s.

W:l.ter

*lt&gt;te:
SOURCE:

Plain

Counts not available for sorre years in all locations
Michigan Cepartnent of Transportation

-77-

�r---,. i

and Hale Street (see Map 11).
The majority of curb and gutters are along collector streets such as State Street, Hall
Street and East Street.

I

'·

There are 16.02 miles of sidewalk within the City.
As with
curb and gutter, the majority of sidewalks are located in the
older, more developed portion of Eaton Rapids (see Map 12).
While most areas that are improved with sidewalks, contain
sidewalks on both sides of the street, there are several
streets that have sidewalks on one side.
The majority of
those streets do not have curb and gutter.
In essence, while
about 50 percent of the City contains curb and gutter and/or
sidewalks, the majority of streets away from the core of the
City, and which were built at a later time period, do not
have curb gutter and sidewalk improvements.
Alternative Transporation Methods
Other than by private vehicle, Eaton Rapids only other form
of transit is via the EATRAN Public Bus System. Rail service
is no longer available in the City, and the closest commercial airport is in Lansing CCapital City Airport) approximately 25 miles north. The small Charlotte municipal airport
is 10 miles to the west.
The EATRAN system works on a reservation-required basis only.
Although residents may be picked up almost anywhere in the
City,
a
one-hour
reservation
is
needed
to
join
a
"Dial-A-Ride" route between Eaton Rapids and most adjoining
communities.
Rides to other outlying areas require a reservation 24 hours in advance, since only one vehicle is allocated for this service.
Connections to the Capital Area
Transit Authority (CATA) are also offered, which services the
greater Lansing Area.
In total, EATRAN serves Eaton Rapids
with 14 scheduled bus routes daily, although no specific
pickup and drop points are provided.
Problem Areas
The most often cited problem areas for traffic evolve around
the core of the downtown.
Individuals looking for parking
spaces, specific establishments, or simply as through traffic, tend to slow down and add congestion to the overall flow
of traffic.
If vehicular control devices (stop signs,
lights, etc.) are poorly placed, the problems are magnified.
Most readily identifiable is the Hamlin/Main Street intersection.
Vehicles traveling east on Hamlin have trouble maki~g
a left on Main to proceed north.
Many residents have asked
for a traffic signal in this location, but the number of left
turns attempted has not been sufficient for the state to
authorize a traffic signal at this time.
Another problem
area is in the vicinity of the Main Street and Marlin Street
intersection, due to left-turn traffic.

-78-

(

I

�l

I
I

,

..

~=--'ii

I

□

. m.:::===~=::;:::J
'

c:5 CJ

________.....__~,

p

•

[:J[] [if :
~~
,I

~□~~

~U

oi:m~

r i

''

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

MAP 11
EXISTING CURB AND GUTTER
•'

@
-

-79-

Gove Associates Inc.

�I

r

. !
I

;

.

r-:=---~··

-,~
ciJD
:
~~□□

I

.

••

::~
•

~□

. . qg - "'- "-~
~og

□□'
C
i;:;i

~bJ□CT~._________...U o□r;-

•

I

~~
EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

.
legend

-

MAP 12
EXISTING SIDEWALKS
AND PUBLIC PARKING

SIIEWALKS
PUBLIC PARKIN;

@
-80-

~

Gove Associates Inc.

_j

�........
i

'

l

..

:

,

,._'
I •

'\ ....

A potential problem may also develop further north on Main
Street as the old Horner Woolen mill site is redeveloped.
A
project at this location may add a great deal of traffic to
the existing system, and at a er i tical point in the City
(M-50/M-99/Main Street intersection).
Vehicular parking is also a concern in the City, especially
to individual merchants.
A lack of parking close to a consumers destination is often enough discouragement to forego
"one-stop" shopping.
Other times, parking spaces which are
close enough are generally filled - sometimes by employees of
the stores, other times by commuters, car pools, etc.
The
City does not allocate lots (or portions of them) specifically for long term ( 2 hours or more) vehicular parking.
There are seven off-street public parking areas in the
Central Business District between Spicer Street and the old
Horner property.
In addition, there are also nine private
off-street parking lots in this area (see Map 13).
The City's Department of Public Works identified a little
over three miles of streets in Eaton Rapids that needed some
type of improvement ( right-of-way realignment, storm sewer
improvement, paving) as of June 1988.
The majority of these
are local streets located in the eastern and southern portions of the City (see Map 14).
In response to the question" ... how would you rate ... services and facilities in Eaton Rapids?", residents ranked
streets as the third worst overall.
This may include not
only the condition of the streets, but also vehicular control
devices employed (turning lanes, speed limits, signs, lights,
etc. ) .
Ranked fifth worst was the City sidewalks, which
would assume not only their condition, but lack of existence
in many areas.
This provides a handicap to many alternative
forms of movement (walking, bicycles, etc.).

Synopsis
The
State
Department
of
Transportation
is
currently
completing work on two improvements/expansions to specific
streets within Eaton Rapids.
These include:
1.

M-99 project from N. Main to the north City
limits, including the realignment at Main
Street and Canal Street and the widening of
Canal Street and Michigan Street to three
lanes.

2.

Extension of North Street south to Dexter/
M-50 as part of the M-99 project; this would
also include the termination of Division
Street at North Street.

-81-

�EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

.

legend

pp

MAP 13
DOWNTOWN PUBLIC PARKING LOTS
PUBLIC PARKIN;
PRIVA'IE PARKIN:;

wrs

0'

wrs

@
-82-

Gove Associates Inc.

�,-

i ...

.. 'l

--,1]

e_,.._;r_o_N_R_A_P_1o_s_c_o_M_P_R_E_HE_N_s_1v_e_o_e_v_e_L_OP_M_E_N_T_P_L_A_N_ _ _ _ _

-

a . . 1_ _ _ _ _ _

,,

,,..

MAP 14
IMPROVEMENTS NEEDED
LOCAL/MAJOR STREETS

@
-83-

Gove Associates Inc.

�-,

i
_,I'

3.

In addition, streets in the Irish Downs
Subdivision 1-4 have been completed.
These
will connect with existing Union/Connemara,
Knight, and Miller Drive (This is being
constructed by a developer and is not a
project being administered or constructed by
the Michigan Department of Tranportation).

.,
II
I

These projects, and those of the future, should be considered
in relation to the proposed goals and objectives, and their
methods of implementation.
By doing this, existing problems
and concerns may be alleviated, and potential ones avoided.
The addition of sidewalks, curb and gutter on residential
streets that currently do not have these facilities would
contribute substantially to the City's attractiveness and
quality of life, as would bicycle pathways/lanes within the
City.

I

!
I
I

-84-

I

�.-- ..
'

,I

•

.

'
' ..

I ·.
I

~

i -

'.
I
i

L .~-

SECTION VIII
COMMUNITY FACILITIES/SERVICES

')

:
',

.....

�._ J

COMMUNITY FACILITIES/SERVICES

Municipal Administration
The City is constituted as a Home Rule City, with a Council/
Manager form of government. Local decision-making is made by
a five member City Council with several Council appointed
boards
and
commissions,
consisting
of
the
Planning
Commission,
zoning
Board of Appeals,
Board of Review,
Advisory Park Board; Library Board, Mechanical Board of
Appeals,
Housing
and Building
Board of Appeals, Local
Officers Compensation Commission and the Downtown Development/Tax Increment Finance Authority.
The day-to-day operation of the City are guided by a City Manager, including the
overview of various departments and divisions.
There are 42
full-time and four part-time City employees.
The City Hall of Eaton Rapids is located downtown on the
corner of South Main and West Hamlin Streets.
It contains
the offices of the City Manager, City Clerk-Treasurer, and
the Building Inspector.
It also houses the City Council
Meeting Room. Although the City Hall is old (built in 1912),
it is presently adequate for the City's needs.
Its &lt;:entral
location is well suited for the public's convenience.
No
relocation plans are now under consideration. However, owing
to the age of the building, it is likely that a new building
will be warranted in the future.

I

j

•

Eaton Rapids contains four DPW buildings.
The Garage, which
was built in 1960 houses City vehicles plus offices and a
service area.
The two Pole Buildings, one constructed in
1967 and the other in the 1980's, function for the storage of
seasonal equipment, vehicles and job materials.
The Salt
Building, also erected in 1987, is used for street salt
storage.
All four buildings are in excellent condition.
They will adequately service the City in the future.
Public Safety
The City's Fire Department includes its chief and 17 volunteers, and it utilizes nine vehicles to serve the City.
The
fire department now services only the City of Eaton Rapids.
The City Police force consists of a chief and a staff of
seven sworn officers.
They make use of three vehicles,
replacing one annually, and issue 1100-1200 citations per
year.
Approximately 60 citations per year are for drunk
driving, with about 1/3 of them going to residents of Ea.ton
Rapids.
State Street and Dexter Street near the schools are
where most speeding citations are issued. There are very few
major crimes in the City; primarily vandalism and local noise
enforcement is handled by · the department.
Eaton County
Sheriff Department and Michigan State Police assistance are
provided on an as-needed basis.

-85-

�[fil

3

1
[fil

i

legend
Schools D
7:"""1rorthwestern Elementary (Playground and Nature Study)
2. Union Street Elementary (Playground)
3. Eaton Rapids High School (Ball Fields, Stadiwn, Track,
Tennis Courts)
4. Southeastern Elementary (Playground)
s. Eaton Rapids Middle School (Pool)
6. King Street Adult Education
7. School Administration/Bus Garage
Municieal Facilities A 0
City Hall, Police Department
9. Fire Oepartment
10. Library
11. Cemetery
12. Sewage Treat Plant
13. Water Plant
14. Pub lie Works Garage
15. Public Restrooias

a.

Park - Recreation O
16. Old Athletic Field
17. Hall Street Park
18. Island Park
19. McArthur River Park
20. Hemori al Park
21. Biggs Park
22. Senior Citizens Center

23.

MAP 15
COMMUNITY FACILITIES

•

""

Hospital

@
-86-

_Gove Associates Inc. ·

�Parks and Recreation
The City's parks and recreation areas are located primarily
near the center portions of the City, and to the north of the
downtown.
McArthur River Park, a neighborhood park along the
east side of the Grand River at McArthur River Drive, is the
farthest point south in the City provided for recreation.
TABLE 31
PARK AND RECREATION AREAS

Description

Name

Size
(Acres)

Location

Amenities

Northwestern
Elem. School

Playground

6.0

Dexter Rd.

Play Equipment

Southeastern
Elem. School

Playground

8.0

Greyhound
Drive

Play Equipment

Union St.
Elem. School

Playground

5.0

Union St.

Play Equipment

Island Park

Community

2.0

DowntownGrand
River

Picnic Facilities
Play Equipment,
Gazebo

Old Athletic

Community

W. Knight
Street

All-purpose Tennis
Courts, (tennis/
basketball/dances)
5 Ball Fields,
Pavilion, Tables,
Grills, Horseshoes

Hall St. Park

Neighborhood

0.8

N. Hall
Street

Grills, Benches
Tables

McArthur
River Park

Neighborhood

1.0

McArthur
Drive

Playground, Grills,
Tables, Boat Launch

Memorial Park

Neighborhood

S. Main
Street

Veterans Memorial,
Shuffleboard

Biggs Park

Neighborhood

Senior
Center

Community

SOURCE:

30

.25
0.5

Gove Associates Inc.
-87-

Montgomery
Street

Gr ills, Swings,
Picnic Tables,
Play Area

Grand &amp;
Hall Sts.

Senior Citizen
Services

�';

Schools
The Eaton Rapids School District ( see Map 16) has, as of
September 1988, 2944 students.
This is an 8.7 percent
decline from 1967-68, and consists of 1262 pupils in kindergarten through the fifth grade, 592 pupils in grades six
to eight, 831 pupils in grades 9-12, 159 adult education students and 100 special education students.
The following facilities
educational purposes:

are

currently

being

utilized

for

TABLE 32
EDUCATIONAL FACILITIES

Building
Size
Size
(Sg. Ft.) (Acres)

Name/Ty:ee
Northwestern Elem.
Southeastern Elem.
Union Elem.
E.R. Middle School
E.R. High School
King St. - Adult Ed.
Maint./Board of Ed.

30,121
37,175
22,500
120,000
119,000
31,386
12,200

40
10
20
20
20
3.5
3

Year
Built

Site
Enrollment
se12t. '88

1958/66 Add.
1969
1962
1969
1963/69 Add.
1938
1952/1968
Total

533
452
313
619
852
159
2,928*

*Total enrollment by school does not equal total school districk enrollment as some students (special ed.) are not
assigned to a specific school.
SOURCE:

Eaton Rapids Public Schools

The school district's administration includes 16 special
education teachers for the gifted, talented, and learning
disabled and emotional children.
Additionally, vocational
students attend classes at Lansing Community College, and the
county cooperative schools allow students to travel and
attend classes elsewhere if they are not available at the
home school.
The school system requires a $40.00 fee of students to enter
the athletic program, with all of the activities handled
through school.
The facilities available include:
elementary playground equipment; swimming pool in the middle
school; gymnasiums; softball and baseball diamonds, track;
football and soccer fields.
-88-

~

I

l

�----------------r-----------~------------------1

I
I

....

I

BENTON

DELHI

--------------1

►---------------r
I
I
I
I
I

r·

EATON

EATON

RAPI

AURELIUS

I

I
I
I
I
I
I

-------~

---1~-----

I

I
I
I

I
I
I
I

BROOKF ELD

I
I

I
I

I

I

I
I
I
I
I

----...lI

f

-'"-----Dl

I

I

I

I
I

---------------·I
I

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
MAP 16

legend
EATON RAPIDS
PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT

~

-~ SCHOOL DISTRICT LIMITS
----- TOWNSHIP LIMITS

@
-89-

Gove Associates Inc.

�There are no private or parochial schools within the City.
The nearest private school is the Eaton Rapids Christian
Fellowship Academy, located about three miles west of the
City on M-50.
This school consists of grades K-12 and
currently has 12 students, including four from Eaton Rapids.
Library
The library is located in a building downtown which is rented
by the City near City Hall.
It contains over 20,000 volumes,
and has cooperative privileges with the Capital Area Library
Cooperative.
Its total circulation in 1988 was 55,253 volumes. Because of the cooperative privileges, audio and video
tapes are also available, although no computer aids are
supplied.
The library has a five member board, and its serves the City
plus Eaton Rapids
and Hamlin townships,
and half
of
Brookfield Township. Funding is received from general funds,
State aid and penal fines.
Social Services
The Veterans of Foreign Wars (VFW) National Home is located
approximately four miles southeast of Eaton Rapids.
The
facility has a national scope, with two programs relating to
the care of veterans:
1.

The national parent
and children).

program

( Single

parents

2.

Residential (State licensed) - children without parents.

The complex originated in 1925, and now has 640 acres and 63
buildings (including 36 single and two-story homes). Present
residents include 81 children, 13 parents, and 15 scholarships.
There are also 84 staff members/employees, plus consultants.
Medical Services
The Eaton Rapids Community Hospital (1500 s. Main Street) has
41 beds and was built in 1957 with community support.
An
additional wing was added in 1977.
The hospital receives no
federal funding, but does have a high degree of cornmuni ty
support.
Of 150 employees at the hospital, four are doctors, under
contract, 42 are registered nurses, and there are 15 LPN's.
Approximately 90 physicians from the general area (including

-90-

~ '

�Lansing) have access to the hospital I s facilities.
Twentyfour hour emergency service is available, in addition to
surgery, laboratory, pathology, internal, pharmacy, pediatrics and others specialties.

t--:',

I

The Eaton Rapids Professional Building, located across from
the hospital, is a privately run practice.
This clinic has
18 employees and four physicians.
It specializes in internal
medicine and family practice.
Some out-patient services include therapy, radiology, stress
tests, laboratory, cardiology, and health education.
An
advance life support ambulance service attended by paramedics
is provided through a Charlotte-based ambulance company.
Solid Waste Disposal

\ ...

r,
\

I
I .'

The City does not provide for refuse pickup for its citizens.
Residents and businesses contract with three private hauling
firms in the area for this service.
Residential waste is
collected via curbside pickup on specified days each week,
while commercial waste is deposited in 'dumpsters' for pickup
by packer trucks.
Refuse is then trucked to the C&amp;C Landfill
in Calhoun County.
The Eaton County Solid Waste Management
Plan calls for landfilling to be the primary method of waste
disposal over the next five to twenty years, with the possibility of a drop-off or curbside collection system for
recycling.
A central recycling processing facility is proposed for the county which will collect, segregate and ship
recyclable mater i als to various markets.
Leaf composting in
municipalities will also be encouraged.
Cemetery

Rosehill Cemetery is the only cemetery within the
located in the southwest corner off of West Street.
approximately 45 acres in size.

City,
It is

Sewer/Water/Storm Sewer and Public Utilities

The water system in Eaton Rapids contains six wells, 172 fire
hydrants and 1700 service connections.
The water tower capacity is 250,000 gallons, and the normal water consumption in
the City is approximately 500,000 gallons minimum per day.
The maximum consumption rate the system can handle is
3,600,000 gallons/day.
The primary wastewater treatment plant, with a 1.2 million
gallons per day design capacity and a 2.0 million gallons per
day maximum capacity, had a three million dollar secondary
expansion in 1978.
The City has two sanitary sewer lift stations with 22.5 miles of sanitary sewer line ranging from 6"
to 21", and 381 manholes.
The City also has 17. 6 miles of
storm sewer lines ranging from 8" to 36", two storm sewer
lift stations, 163 storm sewer manholes, and 410 catch basins.
-91-

�Eaton Rapids owns a 2,400/4,160 volt wye electrical distribution system consisting of approximately 179 miles of primary
and secondary conductors.
Electrical service is supplied to
the City by Consumers Power Company at a substation near the
center of the City.
In addition, the City has 413 fixtures
which light the streets, parks, athletic fields, parking
lots, and the downtown district.
They are made up of a
variety of high intensity lamps.
Natural gas service throughout
Consumers Power Company.

the

City

is

provided

I

• I

'

I

by

Energy Conservation
The high cost of energy impacts upon the cost of municipal
operations as well as household, commercial and industrial
expenses.
The City purchases electricity from Consumers
Power and bills local residences and businesses accordingly.
It is up to individual users to practice energy conservation,
including
adding
insulation,
improving
window openings,
changing to more efficient furnaces, etc.
The City has practiced energy conservation by upgrading the
windows in City Hall for better thermal insulation. In addition, over the past 10 yea-rs the fire station has been
upgraded with insulated overhead doors, new thermopane windows, removal of windows and closure of window and door openings, downsizing of windows and replacement of furnaces with
energy efficient units.
Any future upgrading of City Hall
would also include energy conservation measures.

Synopsis
The City contains a full range of public facilities and services needed for daily activities that occur within its
jurisdiction. Administrative procedures are defined by state
statutes, although decision-making processes reflect local
preferences.
Administrative facilities, while adequate to
meet present needs, may need to be updated to accommodate
greater efficiency and continuing changes in administrative
procedures and technologies. Public safety, including police
and fire services and facilities also appear to be adequate.
Public facilities near the Grand River and public access to
the river are available but limited.
The Grand River is a
major asset to the community and presents a prime opportunity
for public recreation as well as enhancement of the Central
Business District.
A full range of educational facilities
and services are available in Eaton Rapids through the Eaton
Rapids Public Schools.
In addition, easy access to higher
education in Lansing and East Lansing contributes to the
comprehensiveness of formal education available to local
residents.
All of the existing school buildings are relatively modern and should meet the needs of the school system

-92-

.~

�I.

through the twenty-year plan period.
The library is an
important component of the cultural and educational character
of the area, and as such, should be promoted within the City
and townships.
The location of the Eaton Rapids Community
Hospital within the City is a positive element of the City
and surrounding area.
However, with the current f inane ial
problems that many hospitals face, the Community Hospital
will likely have to expand its capabilities while operating
at reduced budgets in order to remain competitive. There are
a number of sewer, water and stormwater improvements that
should be made in order to maintain and improve the public
infrastructure as the City develops. Coordination with development adjacent to the City in surrounding townships should
also be encouraged.

t •.
I

.

!
i"
I ~

i
i

r
I

.,

\

'

Overall, the major problem in providing for the expansion,
improvements, or in some cases, retention, of public facilities and services, is the acquisition and allocation of
financing for those facilities and services.
Efforts to
raise revenue for public and quasi-public entities should
involve an annual cooperative effort between the public and
private sectors to guarantee financing to retain and improve
those types of community assets.

f .,

-93-

�PART 11
' .

!..

ri

l..
l -i
I

'
, __

I

FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLAN

�,, "

I.

l'_,;'

I.

\l --'

I

•

I

1

1

i

L.

_SECTION I
INTRODUCTION

ii

�INTRODUCTION

Up to this point, the text has defined and analyzed past and
present data and information that comprises the City of Eaton
Rapids and its immediate area.
In Part I, the City's
characteristics relative to population, housing, economy,
land use, natural resources, and community facilities were
described individually as well as bein:; integral components
of the area's total economic, human resource and physical
(land use) system.
Part II relies on that analysis to formulate a development plan for the next 20 years.
This plan
sets forth the various components that will comprise the City
of Eaton Rapids, given the opportunities that are currently
available and will likely be available at some future time
for residents and elected and appointed officials.

,..
I

In general, the City will not grow substantially in terms of
quantity ( new residents and new businesses).
The intent of
the development plan, therefore, is to promote and set forth
change - that is, the revitalization of those elements that
now comprise the City to consistently improve and maintain
the area's quality of life.
The format for describing that
development plan consists of identifying its individual components - i.e., the individual plans and programs for residential, commercial, industrial, transportation, parks and
recreation, community facilities and services, overall land
use, natural resources conservation and improvement, and
overall sense of community.
Each component is described in
terms of its goal, objectives and policies, land use pattern,
narrative description, and implementation program.

'
L.

-94-

.....

�'j

L
J....,

l

\.

'
'

.

I

'

'

i

!,, _ .•.

SECTION II
OVERALL LAND USE

.

�OVERALL LAND USE

i.

'-·

Over the next 20 years, Eaton Rapids' municipal boundaries
should remain as they are today, as there is enough vacant
developable land within the City to accommodate expected
growth.
The majority of the City's land area (approximately
991 acres, or 48%) will be devoted to single-family or duplex
residential development.
Another 69 acres will be allocated
to multiple-family housing in various locations, particularly
in the eastern and northern portion of the City as well as
near the downtown core.
Both sing le-family and multiplefamily
housing
may
also
be
located
in
Planned
Unit
Development areas, which will encompass 140 acres near the
City's northern boundaries.
In addition, multiple-family
housing may also be combined with offices in designated areas
that cover over 17 acres, primarily just north of the Central
Business District.
These uses are intended to complement
the City's downtown commercial area and create higher density
activity in the CBD.
Mobile homes, are for the most part, to
be concentrated in a 36 acre planned mobile home development
in the southwest portion of the City.
In total, residential
land uses will occur at various densities on approximately
1,100 acres of land, or 55 percent of the City's total area.
Commercial land use will continue in the existing downtown
area, with an emphasis on redevelopment and revitalization.
That includes redevelopment/reuse of the Old Horner property
as well as storefront and building renovation along Main
Street, streetscape improvements and occupancy of existing
vacant buildings.
More defined commercial uses will be
allowed along South Main Street, between South Street and
Park Street on the West side, and between Plain Street and
Haven Street on the east side, and between Marlin Street and
the southern City limits on the east side.
These will be
primarily automobile oriented businesses that will have their
own off-street parking facilities.
There will be a total of
54. 2 acres devoted to commercial use, with approximately 30
percent ( 16. 5 acres) being in the Central Business District
and 70 percent (37.7 acres) along South Main Street.
Industrial land use will comprise over about 127 acres, most
of which is in the City's southern boundary, including 23
acres in the City's industrial park.
It is the City's intent
to concentrate these activities as much as possible in one
area, realizing that some existing industrial activities will
continue to exist outside of this area.
Industrial land uses
will include manufacturing, assembly and warehousing operations.
Public
facilities,
including
municipal
administrative
offices, police and fire station, Department of Public Works
garage, sewage treatment plant, well field and school grounds

-95-

�and buildings will cover over 110 acres.
Because these
facilities are considered to be adequate to accommodate the
City's needs over the next 20 years, the amount of area
devoted to public facilities will not be expanded.
The seven churches currently serving the City encompass
almost 16. 5 acres.
While there are no existing plans for
additional churches, it is possible that additional land will
be set aside for such uses in the future.
Typically,
churches and church-related facilities are located within
residential or commercial areas.
Eaton Rapids Community
Hospital covers over seven acres.
There are no plans for
expansion of this facility and the Plan proposes the same
amount of land be devoted to the hospital over the next 20
years.
Open space and recreation will play a major role in forming
the quality of life in Eaton Rapids. Linear greenbelts adjacent to the river as well as neighborhood and community parks
and natural preservation areas will cover almost 174 acres.
These areas will, in some cases, include playground and
recreation/entertainment facilities,
and in other cases
remain essentially undeveloped.
They will take advantage of
the City's major resources primarily the Grand River, to provide a full range of passive and active recreation activities
for the City's residents and visitors.
Streets and sidewalks, including curb and gutter, will continue to require expansion and improvement over the next 20
years.
New development, on large vacant parcels, particularly in the northern and eastern portions of the City,
will likely include additional local, and perhaps even
collector, streets.
Those residential portions of the City that do not contain
curb and gutter and/or sidewalks on at least one side of the
road will be areas in which such improvements should be concentrated. Additional sidewalks, curbs and gutters should be
constructed on M-99 south to the City limits and along M-50
to the western City limits.
Separate walking /biking paths
would be constructed within the linear greenbelt along the
Grand River and in the natural area on the western boundaries
of the City. Bike lanes on existing road rights-of-way would
connect these walking/biking paths.
This is the proposed land use distribution that the City wiJ l
attempt to achieve over the next 20 years.
In reality, not
all land that is designated for the various types of development scheduled in this Plan will actually be developed.
It
is expected that at the end of the planning period, vacant
lands will still exist within the City.
Obviously, the
extent to which land is developed depends upon the overall
economic, social and physical attractiveness of Eaton Rapids
to new businesses and residents.
-96-

-.
i

i

�i

Table 33 depicts the general allocation of future land uses
proposed in this Plan.
1

TABLE 33
FUTURE LAND USE ALLOCATIONS
,

.

'

Acres

Land Use

Percent of Total

Residential

,

..

- Single-Family
- Multiple Family
- Mobile Home Parks

991
69
42

47.8
3.3
2.0

Office/Multiple-Family

17

0.8

16
38

0.8
1. 8

127
109
16
7
174
241
85
140

6.1
5.3
0.8
0.3

Commercial
Central Business District
- South Main Street
Industrial/Warehouse
Public Facilities
Churches
Hospital
Open Space/Recreation
Streets
Water
Planned Unit Development*
Total

8.4

11.6
4.1
6.8

2,072

*Area includes streets, recreation, residential and/or commercial development.
A Planned Unit Development is a type
of development on a larger site that requires the total
development concept, land use patterns, circulation, landscape and structure design, utilities and other site amenities to be identified prior to approval and development.
The Planned Unit Development concept allows flexibility in
design, platting, street layout, and other elements relative
to standard development controls, such as zoning and subdi vis ion regulations.
The result is a more efficiently
designed development that creatively utilizes the environmental conditions of the site on which it is located.
A
Planned Unit Development can consist of all residential land
use, all commercial land use, or industrial land use, or a
combination of land uses.
Typically, Planned Unit Development contains open space/recreation areas.
SOURCE:

Gove Associates Inc.
-97-

�I

-

I

/""·..; '

Incremental Development Patterns

l

As with any community, the development of Eaton Rapids will
occur in various phases over time. This development will not
likely be consistent, but rather the City will experience
change in II spurts 11 , typically in conjunction with regional,
state and national economic fluctuations.
To achieve the
results (goals) called for in this Plan, the City will have
to develop programs to direct and guide growth in the desired
manner.
While it is not possible to determine with any certainty where and to what extent development will actually
occur within the City, this Plan has attempted to describe,
in graphic form, the patterns of development for the City in
five year increments over the next 20 years.
Maps 17, 17a,
17b, 17c depict the most desirable (preferred) land use
patterns at 5, 10, 15 and 20 year stages.
These depictions
are general and, in reality, actual land uses at specific
locations may very well differ from what is proposed.
Overall, changes will consist of new developments occurring
in existing vacant areas near the outer perimeter of the City
as well as redevelopment of existing "built-up" areas.
The following briefly describes the progressive changes,
depicted in the development maps, by land use category:

•

I

.J
.,,
I
I

as

r, '.

Year 0-5

During the first five years, single-family residential will
continue to be predominant, with infill of vacant buildable
lots in existing residential neighborhoods.
A new mobile
home park is being constructed east of Hyatt Street.
Commercial development over the first five years will consist
of retaining the Central Business District between State
Street and Brook Street and making continued improvement to
the buildings and public facilities in the area.
Some 'highway• oriented commercial infill will occur south of Marilyn
Street and Spicerville Highway as well as the intersection of
Elizabeth and Main streets.
Off ice development will be concentrated in an area between
Division and Brook streets during the first five years of the
Plan.
Multiple-family housing will also be allowed in this
area.
Industrial land uses will, for the most part, be concentrated
in the area east of Jackson Street ( south of Haven Street)
and in and around the City's industrial park.
In two
instances, industries will remain in their current location
outside the area of industrial concentrations with limited
expansion to allow for buffering between these activities and
adjacent residential areas.
These are the properties located

-98-

�•·.-.

I •

,l

&gt;

I ,

'l' ..

&gt;

r •

on the corner of Brook and Main streets and the area between
Plain, Hall, Hyatt and Elizabeth streets.
The general area
bounded by Kinneville Road, Jackson Street, Haven Street and
Water Street will be infilled with industrial activities over
the 20 year plan period. These industrial activities will be
required to include natural or man-made buffers to separate
them from conflicting residential development.
In the next
five years, the City's industrial park, bordered by Hamman
Drive, Hults Drive and Kinneville Road will begin to attract
smaller light industrial operations located on separate parcels.
Community facilities will, for the most part, remain
intact, with expansion of utilities (such as wastewater
treatment) as necessary to accommodate future demand.
A r i verwalk along the west side of the Grand River running
north from State Street to a point northeast of Mill Street
will be constructed to allow greater pedestrian access to the
river in the downtown area. It is expected that this walkway
will 'open up' the backside of the buildings in this area to
pedestrian access and consequently enhance the rear facade of
these buildings.
Year 5-10

,.

'',
r .•

Between the 5th and 10th year, additional "infill" in
existing single-family neighborhoods will occur and new
single-family development will take place west of West
Street ( north of the cemetery), near the southeast corner
of the City, east of the Grand River and in the northwest
quadrant, north of Knight Street and east of Kerry Street.
These will vary in intensity from one-fifth or one-four th
acre lots to one acre or larger single-family sites.
Development of multiple-family housing will be concentrated
in a block area bounded by Minerva, Division, Canal and
Lansing streets, as well as Market Street to and along
Michigan Street to a point beyond Wood Street.
By the 10th year, the property at the corner of Canal Street
and Main Street will be converted from warehousing to mixed
commercial/office and additional 'highway' commercial businesses will be constructed along Main Street between Plain
Street and Elizabeth Street.
Redevelopment activities wi 11
continue within the Central Business District.
By the 10th year, the area east of canal, southeast of Market
and west of the Grand River will also be developed as mixed
office/multiple-family.
Between the 5th and 10th year, the City's industrial park
will be almost, if not completely, developed.

-99-

�.J
.

Recreation and open space development between the 5th and
10th year consist of a riverwalk/linear greenbelt adjacent to
the Grand River from the mill race near the Horner property
to State Street.

'
i

-:-l
.J

Year 10-15
By the 15th year, new single-family housing development will
take place primarily in the northwest corner of the City,
along Dexter Street, west of Canal Street and north of
Lansing Street.
Additional multiple-family development will
take place west of N. River Street, adjacent to the Grand
River (condominium development would be the highest and best
use at that site) and west of Greyhound Drive, across from
the Junior High and High Schools.
By the 15th year, a higher density commercial activity will
occur between Plain Street and Alice Street, primarily along
Main Street but also adjacent to Jackson Street.
Industrial
activity
(primarily
light
manufacturing
and
'high-tech' businesses) and warehousing will expand from the
City's industrial park north and east to incorporate much of
the vacant property north of Hammon Drive and east of Holts
Drive.
This development should occur as an expansion of the
indusrial park concept initiated by the City, although it
could occur as either a private for-profit venture or as a
public or non-profit industrial development.
Between the 10th and 15th year, the area surrounding Spring
Brook will be formally retained as open space/recreation,
including the establishment of a bicycle/pedestrian path.
A
large open space area west of Lake Street will also be developed as well as an ext ens ion of the r i verwalk/g reenbel t on
both sides of Grand River north of Union Street, including a
large open space area north of the City's wastewater treatment plant.
Year 15-20
By the 20th year, inf ill in existing neighborhoods will be
substantial with only a few buildable lots likely remaining.
New single-family housing will occur at varying densities on
the outer perimeter of the City, including Planned Unit
Development west of Canal Street and north of Dexter Street
( this will be predominantly single-family and within a 'L'
shaped parcel east of East Street. This latter P.U.D. parcel
will be a ·combination of resort/hotel, multiple-family and
single-family development. Multiple-family housing will also
be constructed north of Brook Street near the City's west
boundary.

-100-

.

.

-

�By the 20th year, 'highway' commercial will be in place between w. Plain and Alice streets on the east side of Main
Street and between South Street and Park Street on the west
side of Main Street.
Additional highway commercial on the
east side of Kyle Street will also take place.
I

!'.'.

j

'

'L...

By the 20th year of the planning period, the entire area in
the south central 'triangle' will be devoted to industrial/
warehousing land use.
Open spaces will be distributed
throughout this area and greenbelt buffers will be located
around the perimeter to minimize or mitigate conflicts between industrial activities and surrounding residential and
commercial land uses. Most industrial and warehousing operations will be aggregated within the industrial 'triangle'.
By the year 2010, another park/open space area will be
established between the Grand River and Water Street (across
from Haven Street).
The foregoing descriptions are intended to reflect and identify the most desirable timing and location of land use
development and redevelopment.
In reality, given the projected population growth for the City, it is likely that
there will, by the end of the 20 year planning period, be
some land on the City's perimeter that will remain undeveloped.
Nevertheless, the desired 20 year plan land use pattern represents the optimum distribution of activities for
the entire City as it will look when fully developed.

-101-

�i '

·---

.

!. ..

.....

i .
I

I

.•

!L

I

'1
I .
' '

l
I

:

'

L

SECTION Ill
RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

�ILi
)

)

I

' .- -----·-----.....~
.,
:·

-

=--=---:.t~=r.=.
, --

~11

!
I

-,L-✓
.
□
~I □.
.."'

.

~

L•MSluG

____......,.

"/JI

...

I

:,:

.,..1
-•

•

US£L

lllti!.OII

:_:·~L,

'&lt; A

,.

Ill

·--~ ~- , lf3-□ Ef Rrf\1
'

.LL.!!''H
y

l(__J

.J{lNICHT

II

_

. ~

.w□D

~ □□

.

1ITT□fl
•· ···· ·---"'

dLJJ'

I

t ------

$Tar~

I □□-_· _·

1 '"''"

,r_~_ ;·

. ,fl □■ u~\\~J 11l(ONARD 11

-- -

1

~

~

n-=--\~..........__---------..:.~~-lu.r1
~, □□ CJ
I

i

[I'~~~[.~~
nno[J1~11

~ UJ . '

KAir(~

!f---

'" ~I

,.•

:-;I

-l
I

"-'-~

~[N

~09~[~~
, l~lfi □
~

D

_] ·- -

,o

',iilil

I
I

ILIIID

ill LI!.:.

f-=1[?~

~

,.J

,.......,,OR
~
~

5PICCK~tLL£ H_!~-~

,--~

-~)

- - - - --

~

·---

I

•

~-SP- - - -~

, -.

!

-- - - - _ . .

I

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
5-VEAR PLAN

I

D

SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

-

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

-

MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

-

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

MAP 17a

MULTI-FAMILY /OFFICE

-

MOBILE HOME PARK

. , , CEMETERY

RETAIL/SERVICE COMMERCIAL

-

_PUBLIC OPEN SPAC.E/RECREATION

WAREHOUSING

1.2:::-3

BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PATH

-

legend -

,~l!,I
-

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
CITY OF EATON RAPIDS

INDUSTRIAL
:

PUBLIC FACILITIES

@

Gove Associates Inc .

�)

)

)
~~

...

-- -. ,-, -

::::::::=!~:..=!::::

V

I

~1i/
!,

:1
:1

11

I'

.I

11

j 11
:S' ' I

~i'
~·I

0]:
ii I

..._,..., _JI
a:'-&gt; ..

!

i

~

.

LUC

_,,
17~I.
~~

I

;, \

~

w□D
~□□

l!fil

r

z

:.

lotllN

"ii,

□ :~ &gt;
., .~
- -~- ~RgtlQ:.·_:: /1.- }-=:J_,~...:,·.:.__ ~r
~ ""

,-IIfJt-·--=-- ,,.~

,·

Id _gi,

1

1

--

"'

1 .;,:

=....:_::::-::1

□ fl ~~
- S:::::

--..-,·

r\\

-

[]rl~
- --.,-~-

~,-1.Jlc
□•

[]] .- .

..

"" . ii]
I,,.,z:7

II _..::,••,

u....u...'I

Ix\~,

cf

useL

r~

.:

; ;

0 Q []

,

~•.

-l

□·

I

cill~~
~I ,
..

I

l~;i

I

D

~-'

/11HO

_ ] __ _

'&lt;· ,;;.

!ULJQ
'/' 1,lr,,

~--

SPIC(HVILL[ H_!q1

~

',•

•·

"'- '~

~

't'~ _

0~

~

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
\

I

10-YEAR PLAN

I e ge

nd

I. l

SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

-

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

-

MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

-

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

MAP 17b

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
CITY OF EATON RAPIDS

-

MULTI-FAMILY /OFFICE

-

PUBLIC FACILITIES

-

MOBILE HOME PARK

-

CEMETERY

-

RETAIL/SERVICE COMMERCIAL

-

_PUBLIC OPEN SPACE/RECREATION

I-~-

WAREHOUSING

12::3

BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PATH

-

INDUSTRIAL

@ I Gove Associates Inc.

�·· --- , .-· --:·:

--i

)

)

-

---

)

.,,.!."'-~

-

~111I•

I

.1

:,:1

ii1·

,I

Iii

I•

~:il

t::,

~!11

,c-}1 . . ◄

~F

LANSING

~

cf

. ii I '._

- -1

"

&amp;

~Jc'
u:J □
5
,..::·
... , I

I I

I I

'I.\

\\\

Ii

--· ·--

I]

. □'.~:i D
W
-~~:· 1
I\

~ BO
~

····-

~

~

~

j

I . . " , .,.

11

.I ~ {- ., .,

z:;:_ IIJ□llli~~~

!'&lt;

:~~·w
:

·~□□• □~,;·"
~.:~11111.i ~,:;
·-□ ~1GAtfM
OJ [J ,h, I i11 ·~
~ Q~-,
1,.,_, ..........?::. . .

r~
- i- .
.
;;;
,/

j/-

.

.l
I

w ,_
,.
~

. D

:,~n

__ J ·- - -

,,

I
I

ll.MIII

'J

-.-,

~L!!

IL II iif:i:i

!Ir

- .~

SPIC[K~ILL( H•t

~

I

I

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
15-YEAR PLAN

D

SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

-

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

-

MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

-

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

-

MULTI-FAMILY /OFFICE

-

PUBLIC FACILITIES

MOBILE HOME PARK

-

CEMETERY

-

RETAIL/SERVICE COMMERCIAL

-

.PUBLIC OPEN SPACE/RECREATION

l~ l

WAREHOUSING

Fl

BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PATH

MAP 17c

legend ·-

-

INDUSTRIAL

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
CITY OF EATON RAPIDS

@ I Gove Associates Inc.

�)

)

)
I

1:

•· l.
·--··-;t

11ji .
I

I

I!
Ii

I:

:s:'
+
"1·1
r:;1,

~J:

.~I,

e1f

"~,~II

'~ Ii

, , Ir, .

.,., .. .;:,:':~

~

,,.., I f

I I

\ I I\\

I I

I I

I I

•·

f;

:.• , ..;_

~•U''~"""~~ ,_ ,, . . .,, ,,

.7r,1a\\ ~~

J
1111

. ,_. ,'

'

&gt;

,,

!

·~-.._-.In ~

,.,·•'

. ,,.

Ir'

hlJ eL

'·.l.,

". r;/
'f l!IL
Ml

,,accawiu

$I

,t··

I

I

EATON RAPIDS COMPfU~HENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
20-YEAR PLAN

L:;;;.l : ,. _. , SINGLE-FAMILY

RESIDENTIAL

-

PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT

-

COMMUNITY FACILITIES

MAP 17
-

MULTI-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL

-

legend ·-

·

MULTI-FAMILY /OFFICE

-

PUBLIC FACILITIES

MOBILE HOME PARK

-

CEMETERY

RETAIL/SERVICE COMMERCIAL

-

,PUBLIC OPEN SPACE/RECREATION

E3

BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PATH

1-:~~!Mffl WAREHOUSING
-

FUTURE LAND USE PLAN
CITY OF EATON RAPIDS

INDUSTRIAL

@ I Gove Associates Inc.

�RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT

Goal
High quality residential development which will fulfill the
needs of the various population segments in the area.
Objectives

.

A.

Provide decent housing for persons of all e c onomic
levels.

B.

Provide a range of housing types
housing conditions in the City .

C.

Obtain coordinated and balanced housing development
among the City of Eaton Rapids and the surrounding
townships (Eaton Rapids and Hamlin).

while

improving

)

I .

Policies
1.

Encourage home ownership in
and
duplexes,
condominiums
designated areas.

the area, including
modular
homes
in

2.

Encourage, directly or indirectly, rehabilitation of
substandard dwellings and preservation of quality
older homes.

3.

Encourage demolition of severly dilapidated housing
and develop, adopt and administer a citywide housing
code to ensure adequate code enforcement of existing
housing.

4.

Encourage new developments to be built in a manner
sensitive to the physical character of the Eaton
Rapids area, including the infilling of vacant lots
in established residential areas through the use of
architectural design ordinance and flexible zoning.

5.

Encourage
continued
single-family
residency
established single-family neighborhoods.

in

Land Use
The definition of the
be consistent with the
dential development to
lation segments in the
objectives.

residential future land use plan must
goal of obtaining a high quality resifulfill the needs of the various popuCity of Eaton Rapids with its specific

-106-

�The City of Eaton Rapids will experience an increase in population of approximately 2. 4 percent over the next 20 year
planning period (refer to Table 6 "Population Projections",
Part I).
Because of this, new housing stock must be made
available, and in a variety of forms, to suit household needs
and financial requirements.
The future land use plan reflects the new and proposed
single-family development on the eastern side of the City.
Additional single-family residential areas are proposed on
Michigan Street as it runs north to the City limits, and as
"inf ill" in scattered vacant areas which are now predominately residential.
However, in an effort to achieve greater
compatibility among adjacent land use, some existing singlefamily areas have been designated for other uses.
This
includes various areas on Main Street (from State Street
south) and a portion on Brook Street at the western City
limits.
New multiple-family housing units are designated for Canal
Street an~ along Michigan Street, along with a large section
of land on the north side of Brook Street (west of Vaughn).
Other smaller areas of existing multi-family housing uni ts
have been slightly expanded in the Plan, which includes portions on State Street and McArthur River Drive.
One location in the City is set aside by the Land Use Plan
specifically for mobile homes, to be located on Hyatt Street
in the southwest corner of the City.
Adjacent uses include
single-family residential lots, a cemetery and public open
space. Currently, mobile homes are primarily concentrated in
the three acre Hickory Haven Trailer Park located on Haven
Street.
Presently there are many areas which have a smattering of
various residential types - primarily duplexes and low density multiple-family mixed with single-family.
The proposed
land use plan would segregate the uses somewhat by lumping
areas together, which will also help create buffers between
single-family residential and other uses of high intensity.
Specific areas are designated in the Plan for a combination
off ice and multiple-family use.
Located northwest of the
Central Business District at Brook,
Cherry and Dexter
streets, the area will serve as a buff er from the singlefamily residential on the north to the industrial and Central
Business District area in the south.
Farther north, and
along the corporate line, are two larger areas set aside for
Planned Unit Development (PUD).
This may include a variety
of residential types, along with compatible off ice and commercial uses.

-107:-

V

�Qualitative Description
The quality of the City's housing stock is a prime component
of the overall attractiveness of the community - both to
individual residents and potential employers.
To attain a
desirable level of quality, existing housing in various portions of the City needs to be upgraded and design and
construction standards that promote quality need to be
encouraged.
Existing housing that is deteriorated or dilapidated, especially those concentrated in certain locations or "pockets"
need to be upgraded to meet housing codes.
Such upgrading
should be the City's top priority in addressing the quality
of its housing, as no individual or household should live in
a unit that is, or is close to being, uninhabitable.
At the
same time, the upgrading of these units should not make them
unaffordable for those residents that are on limited or fixed
incomes.
This is a critical factor in meeting the objective
of providing decent housing for persons of all economic
levels.
In addition, housing that is in good condition and
affordable for low-income first-time buyers should be made
available within the City.
These sing le-family uni ts typically 800-1,200 square feet in area could be publicly financed
and partially subsidized with the stipulation that the units
are sold back to the lender at a fixed rate of inflation to
be resold at a lower price to another first-time home buyer.
Such a program would: 1) make available decent affordable
housing for first-time homebuyers on a continuing basis and
2) allow those homebuyers a reasonable return on their
investment to purchase a larger home over time. One restriction may require the purchaser to agree to buy the second
home in Eaton Rapids when he or she sells the first home.
Additional housing would include a wide range of multiplefamily projects that meet higher yet affordable site plan
standards, medium to luxury priced condominium units and
single-family housing in planned unit developments. The City
should keep abreast of up-to-date concepts in housing development and analyze each concept to determine its applicability to Eaton Rapids.
Flexibility in design and regulation
should be adhered to.
For example, local development standards should be adopted
for 'site' condominium development.
Site condominium development essentially allows single-family detached homes to be
built on separate condominium 'envelopes', or parcels, with
streets, sidewalk and open spaces considered as belonging to
the condominium association.

-108-

�Mobile home park development should be encouraged,
if
designed, constructed and maintained with an emphasis on
quality.
That includes circular streets, relatively larger
mobile
home
sites,
landscaping,
open
space,
on-site
recreation and continued maintenance.
such standards can be
retained while making the uni ts affordable to low/ moderate
income households.
The overall intent of the City's approach to residential
activities should be to accommodate the housing needs of its
residents, including changes in lifestyles and age groups,
while promoting quality development, including housing for
low income households.
Implementation
The actions related to housing in the City of Eaton Rapids
deal basically with the rehabilitation of neighborhoods, the
preservation of quality older homes, and the supply of housing uni ts for households with different income categories.
In any case, actions should respond to the clear identification of the needs of the City of Eaton Rapids, as well
as those of its surrounding townships.
The City of Eaton Rapids could implement the following
actions in order to obtain high quality residential development which will fulfill the needs of the various population
segments in the area:
o

Contact private developers and study the
possibility of establishing a public-private
partnership to develop multi-family projects
for low/moderate income households and senior
citizens.
Although the majority of housing in the United
States is provided by the private sector, it
is possible for the public sector to influence
the market and increase the supply of subsidized housing units.
The City must develop
an entrepreneurial attitude in originating or
taking a lead role in the development, using,
for instance, city-owned parcels or other
assets to participate in joint ventures with
private developers.
Often, the City may have
to assume much of the risk involved in the
projects, however, this leadership role has
the advantage that once the projects have been
completed, the City could also share in their
benefits. Furthermore, any successful project
is an incentive for additional developments in
the area.

-109- -

1

1

�\.

0

Give priority processing to those projects
that provide housing uni ts for moderate and
low income households.

0

Determine a percentage of units (10 or 15 percent, for example) that each new development
shall dedicate for occupancy by very low, low,
and
moderate
income
households
prior
to
granting approvals and permits.
An alternate requirement, such as the dedica tion of land to the City for future public
facilities, should be established when the
developer · cannot include low/moderate units
inthe project.

0

Promote ownership of housing units among residents.
This action could be implemented through the
promotion of programs among landlords aimed at
giving incentives to renter households to
become owners.
Preferences could be given to
occupants willing to make improvements to the
house and with a long-term period of occupancy.
Inc en ti ves such as setting aside a
portion of the annual rent to be used, after a
specified number of years, as a down payment
could be effective for the renter household.

0

Establish a nonprofit housing development corporation that could, among other things, take
possession of deteriorated housing and through
the Michigan Department of Social Services,
repair and sell those units to qualifying low
income households.

0

Promote the creation of community development
corporations and other types of communitybased non-governmental organizations related
to neighborhood development.

0

Encourage the maintenance of quality older
homes,
the
rehabilitation of deteriorated
housing uni ts, and in some cases the demolition of severely dilapidated housing units.
The City Council and the Building Inspection
Department could implement this action by
creating
special incentives such as communitywide recognition for well maintained
older homes, or assist owners in identifying

-110-

�available resources for housing and neighborhood rehabilitation, and organizations such
as the Local Initiatives Support Corporation
(LISC) and the proposed Michigan Neighborhood
Builders Alliance, whose main objective is to
improve the conditions of neighborhood life by
supporting local community development.
Financing Program for Housing
At the federal level, housing developers in the City of Eaton
Rapids can apply for loans offered by the Farmers Home Administration (FmHA) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. That
agency ch·a nnels credits to rural residents and communities;
considering as rural areas those located in rural communities
with population under 10,000, which is the case in Eaton
Rapids (there are currently several projects in the area).
Some Farmers Home Administration programs that could be utilized in Eaton Rapids include the following:
Section 502,
which provides loans to buy, build or rehabilitate adequate
but modest housing; Section 504, which gives loans and grants
to low income applicants who lack repayment ability for a 502
loan; and Section 515 loans, which can be used to build rental housing units to be occupied by low and moderate income
households.
The eligible applicants for those loans are
individuals with low or moderate incomes who are or will be
owners/occupants of the dwelling in rural areas and who cannot obtain credit elsewhere.
Another federal aid program for housing is the Housing Development Action Grant, administered by the U.S. Department of
Housing and Urban Development.
Its objective is to stimulate
rehabilitation of deteriorating urban areas through a partner shp of the public sector, community groups, and private
industry.
Grants are given to applicant communities, who in
turn distribute funds to private developers. Eligible applicants for these grants are cities with physical and economic
distress (poverty, low per capita income, population growth
decline, etc.), willing to implement projects related to
neighborhood revitalization and rehabilitation of residential
structures.
At the state level, the Michigan State Housing Development
Authority (MSHDA) is the public agency that has been created
to address the housing needs of low and moderate income
citizens. The MSHDA has several housing programs to meet the
needs of the community, including loans, grants and different
types of subsidies.
The following are some of the existing
housing programs of the MSHDA:
Home Improvement loans,
Michigan Energy Bank, Section 8 rental assistance and rental
rehabilitation.

· -111-

�l

•.

r .

,. .....

' .

I
L...

Home Improvement Loan Programs are designed to provide below
market interest rate loans for home improvements.
The MSHDA
offers three alternative programs:
the Home Improvement
Program (HIP), the Neighborhood Improvement Program (NIP),
and the Community Home Improvement Program (CHIP).
It is
important to stress that these programs are not mutually
exclusive, they are all possible simultaneously and open to
lenders and communities.
In no case can these funds be used
for luxury and/or recreational improvements.
MSHDA housing projects are funded through the Community
Development Block Grant (CD.83) program, as well as sale of
bonds through the State of Michigan.
The Community Block
Grant program in Michigan has two major components:
one for
economic
development
reJ:ated
projects
(managed
by
the
Michigan Department of Commerce) and the other for housing
projects (administered by the MSHDA).
Eligible applicants
for the Housing Grant Programs are small cities, townships
and villages of less than 50,000 population.
Resources in
this program are dedicated to projects related to home
improvement
programs,
rehabilitation
of
rental
units,
homesteading of vacant properties, programs for the homeless
and public facilities' improvements linked to targeted home
improvement programs •

•

•
-112-

�..
&lt;
•

l

• •

&lt;' •

I

i\ . ,

:~
l. I .

!.

SECTION IV
COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT

�COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT
. -[

Goal
Continued development of Eaton Rapids as the commercial/
service center of the southeastern portion of Eaton County,
while meeting the shopping and employment needs of local
citizens.
Objectives
.
'

I
l

;'

'

A.

Attract visitors and shoppers to the area.

B.

Reinforce
the
role
of
Eaton
Rapids
as
the
commmercial/service center of the southeastern portion of Eaton County.

C.

Improve the "mix" of retail and commercial service
businesses to meet the needs of local citizens.

-

.

Policies

I

1.

Encourage future commercial development to occur
within or near already developed commercial areas.

2.

Attract businesses into the Eaton Rapids area that
will provide for the best commercial/service "mix"
and which will meet known deficiencies.

3.

Formulate a "partnership" between all levels of
government and the Eaton Rapids Business Community.

4.

Take steps to enhan.c e Downtown Eaton Rapids' position
as
a
comparison
shopping
area,
while
encouraging downtown to provide a wide variety of
competitively pr iced convenience i terns designed to
meet the needs of the area residents.

5.

Initiate an aggressive campaign by which to utilize
vacant or obsolete industrial facilities within
the City for commercial retail, service and office
activities.
Land Use

The proposed land use plan should provide the City of Eaton
Rapids with enough space to achieve the general goal and the
specific objectives defined in the commercial development
plan.

-113-

�1· ,.~.

I

•

! .

The proposed land use plan distributes commercial activities
in three separate areas along Main Street and the first block
to the east and/or west of Main (this varies by location).
Proposed commercial land uses run from Canal/Main street
intersection (east side) on the north to State Street, from
Plain Street to Alice Street and from Marlin Avenue to the
southern City limits on the south.
At present, the southern
eight blocks of Main Street are predominately residential
with some commercial establishments interspersed.
The greatest concentration of proposed commercial land use is
on Main Street at Knight, Hamlin and Spicer.
This follows
existing developmment as the highest commercial densities are
found in this three block area.
However, as mentioned
earlier, a Planned Unit Development proposed for a northern
section of the City may also include some commercial activity.
Although this would be rather limited and intend to
primarily service the surrounding residential uses.
Qualitative Description
Eaton Rapids' commercial development is probably the greatest
single physical element that defines the image of the City to
outside visitors. The current image of downtown Eaton Rapids
to many residents is not very positive.
Yet, the natural
environment and physical setting of the Central Business
District offers the potential for establishment of a positive
image as a unique commercial _d istrict.

f

I

i._

The central business core, from Canal Street to State Street,
will be the center of the City's commercial and service
activity. However, to maximize that potential, modifications
and alterations and repairs to existing buildings, particularly storefronts, are needed.
These include replacing
rotted wood, repainting masonry joints, removing metal rust,
repainting
buildings,
adding
new
or
additional
trim,
improving interiors and performing structural alterations as
needed to ensure the soundness of the building.
The City
should strive to retain those buildings that have archi tectural and historical integrity, while modifying or removing
those that have outlived their useful life and do not fit
into the overall historical integrity of the downtown area.
An appropriate mix of specialty retail shops, service commercial and entertainment facilities, including restaurants and
performing arts theatre, should be the primary components of
the Central Business District.
Upper floors of buildings
that as structurally sound, or can be renovated, should be
converted into mid-price to luxury apartments. To complement
building
renovation
and
alterations,
the
City
should
establish a downtown streetscape improvement program.
Such a
program could include, but not be limited to:
sidewalk redesign using brick pavers, street lamps, tree, shrub and flower

-114-

�I'.

planters, street furniture, historical or theme signage,
landscaped off-street parking and other similar improvements.
Redevelopment of the old Horner property at the intersection
of Canal and Main streets should be accomplished using a
theme that will complement the remainder of the buildings in
the downtown core area.
This property should be redeveloped
into a retail/service/office complex, but should not detract
from the revitalization of the balance of the Central
Business District.
Emphasis should also be placed on the
Grand River and Spring Brook, with river walks, lighting,
landscaping, boating and outdoor restaurants adjacent to the
river, with retention of, and improvement to, Island Park.
The overall intent of revitalization of the downtown core
should be to establish _ a pedestrian-oriented area that
attracts customers and patrons from the greater Lansing area.

I ....

,·.

!

1,·
I

The two other commercial areas bordering South Main Street
will be highway or auto-oriented commercial districts.
They
will be larger retail/service outlets into a linear "minimall" configuration or larger discount or grocery stores in
individual buildings.
These buildings will contain their
own off-street parking.
The businesses in these areas will
not compete with the specialty stores in the Central Business
District but will rather serve the daily needs of consumers.
Typical businesses would include larger chain discount
stores,
supermarkets,
fast-food
restaurants,
appliance
stores, auto repair facilities, laundromats and similar
outlets. The design integrity of these commercial facilities
can be controlled by the City to a certain extent through
site plan review, which could require certain standards in
signage, parking and landscaping, as well as buffers between
commercial and residential land uses.
Implementation
Those actions recommended to achieve the commercial development goals and objectives are aimed basically at reinforcing
downtown, attracting investment to the City, promoting the
expansion of local businesses, and improving public facilities related to the commercial development of Eaton Rapids.

i -

I .•

•

Commercial activity plays a key role in the economic development process of the City.
However, the volume of commercial
activity in the Central Business District has decreased
during the last decade, following the general behavior of
Central Business Districts around the country.
According to
surveys conducted in the area, Downtown Eaton Rapids needs to
improve its current mix of businesses, as there is a negative
perception of downtown among local residents. The perception
is that Eaton Rapids is not competitive when compared to the
variety of stores located in shopping malls in Lansing and
Jackson.

-115- -

�•

The following are some of the actions recommended to improve
the commercial conditions of the City of Eaton Rapids:
0

!'

The "Managing Downtown" Market Study identified some businesses that could fit into
downtown's "niche", which are the following:
meat market/deli selling quality meats and
selected
ready-to-eat
foods,
children's
clothing stores, big and tall men's shop,
retail bakery, an · antique mall, and a sit down
restaurant.

·.

0

The City Council could establish a program of
incentives to attract investment to the City,
and at the same time encourage the expansion
of locally owned business.
The following are some of the incentives that
could be established: purchase or acquisition
of tax deliquent properties to be used by the
City as leverage for new or expanded commercial development (land "writedowns"); entering
into a
public/private partnership with a
qualified developer ( such an arrangement can
vary
from
offering
municipal
funds
for
"start-up" costs to a full partnership in
which the City and developer share assets and
liabilities); improvement of public facilities; and the retention and expansion of local
development corporations, such as the Ea ton
Rapids Alliance for Community Development.
In
addition, development and investment plans for
the Horner property should continue to be
pursued.
Some financial assistance for these
actions could be obtained from the Community
Development Block Grant and Small Business
Administration programs.

l

!

Contact private developers in order to promote
the market possibilities that types of businesses have in the area.
This should be done
by the Downtown Development Authority (DDA).

!

0

DOA and other City organizations should be
involved
in
the
construction
of
new
parking facilities, the promotion of special
events
to
attract
people
downtown,
the
rehabilitation of deteriorated facilities, the
demolition of
delapidated facilities,
the
occupancy of vacant structures, and the adequate provision of public services,
such as

-116-

�police
protection,
fire
protection,
snow
removal, etc. Street level spaces in downtown
buildings should be oriented toward commercial
retail and service businesses while second and
third floor areas should be limited to office
and apartment uses.
0

The

DDA and downtown property owners

should

work together within a committee structure to

ensure that vacant retail
are filled accordingly.

'I

spaces

The search committee could serve an important
function as a DDA clearing house for inf ormation on business opportunities in Eaton
Rapids.
The committee could handle initial
inquiries but would particularly be helpful as
a group to which inquiries from prospective
new business operators could be directed.
Information
about
such
contacts/inquiries
would then be given to the DDA for further
follow-up.
Business
people
should
be
encouraged to keep any negative opinions they
may have to themselves and to direct inquiries
instead to the search committee.
The committee should poll local business operators frequently to elicit intormation on inquiries or
expressions of interest which they may have
had from friends, business associates in other
towns, or information on potential new business operators who might be contacted as
prospective occupants of space. Membership on
this committee should consist of realtors,
bankers, etc.

_·.

! '

[

and off ice

l

i •. :J

One class of occupants for additional floor
space are Central Business District businesses
which may be in need of expanded space.
The
revitalization of downtown business is also in
part a function of the ability of the downtown
area to serve as a breeding ground for new
commercial enterprises.
One way to plan for
this type of commercial growth is to encourage
and facilitate the expansion of existing businesses, which not only promotes the growth of
established firms but opens up smaller commercial spaces for new businesses. The potential
barriers to transfers of this sort, such as
the prospect of having to pay a higher rent or
having
to
make
substantial
interior
and
perhaps exterior improvements, may be overcome
with local initiatives.

�•

. -{

A source of potential tenants for local commercial space consists of established independent operations currently located in nearby
cities and towns out of the market area. Many
established independents may have found that
they have grown to the limits of their market
at their present location.
Establishing an
additional office or store in the downtown
area can be presented as an advantageous means
of expanding their businesses.
A business
search committee can begin the process of
targeting
potential branch operations for
downtown by making
exploratory trips
to
surrounding towns . and cities with an eye to
spotting healthy small businesses of types not
currently represented in Eaton Rapids.
In
addition, it can assist in promoting negotiations between owners and prospective downtown
"relocatees" or new tenants and in
developing proposals which would include provisions for · building improvements and for
linking increased rental income to the growth
in sales realized by the new or
relocating
business, as well as
looking for new innovative businesses to locate, or expand: i.e.,
auto mall for service to auto while people
shop and work is an example, or a previously
owned auto dealership ·.
The ini~ial task of this committee is getting
(and then updating) hard facts about all
available properties in the DDA area.
This
information which should be issued per iodically to property owners and brokers who
market the space, includes every unit of
retail, off ice or other space available for
sale or rent. The data includes property status (in pre-leasing, ready-to-go, or needs
work),
floor
level
of
the
space,
area
available, approximate rental Cidentified in
categories, i.e., $2-$3.99/sq. ft., $4-$5.99/
sq. ft., $6-$7.99/sq. ft., etc.), utilities,
parking
availability,
carpeting,
air
condi tionim;,
and
adjoining
vacant
expansion
space. This committee should also mail a promotional package to all appropriate businesses
within the Eaton Rapids Market Area. The committee should follow-up on leads and get them
actively interested in downtown.
The promotional package should stress the positive
features of downtown. First, it should stress
that Downtown Eaton Rapids is a fun place to

-lIA-

�visit and is active, colorful and interesting.
Secondly, it should explain that downtown
businesspeople are working together to exploit
market opportunities and target marketing and
sales efforts.
Thirdly, it should stress the
concept of quality goods and services, as
opposed
to
mediocre
or
cut-rate
i terns.
Fourthly, it should emphasize that the DDA is
providing resources by which private investment is supported with a public commitment.
It should be a high priority of a search committee to assure that upper floor spaces are
being utilized for their best and highest use.
Within the commercial area, most buildings
have upper floors which are used for storage
or business purposes.
These would also support offices or
small retail
businesses.
Physical
improvements
through
CDB3 /Housing
Funds in the upper floor space for housing,
offices or retail space will improve the
quality of tenants and add to potential clientele.
Financing Programs for Commercial Development

·. "'9

While there are many programs related to economic development, the majority of them are oriented to financing projects
that support business activity, especially infrastructure
(sewer, water, streets, etc.). Many of the programs directly
related to economic development are aimed at the promotion of
small businesses, due to the recognized importance of these
types of businesses for regional (and national) economic
development.
At the federal level, the Small Business Administration is
the agency that provides loans and loan guarantees to help
small businesses.
The SBA has several different programs,
such as:
Section 7(a):
Regular Small Business Loans.
Their
objective is to aid small businesses that are unable
to obtain financing in the private credit market.
Besides the independently owned small businesses,
state and local development companies can apply for
loans, for projects such as construction, purchase
of buildings, equipment and material, and working
capital.
Section 8(a): Business Development Program, ensures
participation of businesses owned and controlled by
disadvantaged persons in federal contracting, in
their process to become independent.

_lJ.9-

�i

'

l

•

At the state level, the principal program directly related to
economic development is the Michigan Community Development
Block Grant CCDBG), which is administered by the Michigan
Department of Commerce.
The primary criterion for economic
development grants is the number of jobs that the project
will generate.
The program also addresses economic development planning, community redevelopment and economic development related infrastructure.

L

i.

Section 503:
Certified Development Company Programs.
Their objective is to stimulate the growth
and expansion of small businesses by providing them
with long-term financing.
Activities such as
acquisition of land and buildings, construction,
expansion,
renovation and modernization can be
financed by this program; however, some restrictions apply for applicants.

I

Two specific programs offered by the CDOO for commercial
development are:
Commercial/Retail Loan,
and Downtown
Development and Emergency Community Assistance.
At the local level, the City has financial resources that
could be used to promote commercial development. Besides its
normal revenue sources, the City of Eaton Rapids could use,
and has in place, Tax Increment Financing.
In addition,
Public/Private Partnerships and Special Assessment Taxes
could be used.

i

'

'

Tax Increment Financing programs can be used to redevelop
Central Business Districts that are experiencing declining
property values and create and improve public facilities and
buildings for industrial development.
These programs, under
P.A. 198, the Downtown Development Authority Act, or P.A.
450, the Local Development Finance Authority Act are not tax
abatements, as long as they do not lower any tax rates.
Basically, the idea is to establish a project area and
"freeze" all property valuations (assessments) of the project
area at the beginning of the TIF, and all increases in
assessments due to property improvements are either pledged
for bonds or used directly for making further public improvements in the TIF district.
Once the TIF program is
completed, future tax revenues are returned to the full tax
base of the community.
Public/private co-development is another tool to induce commercial growth.
One form of co-development is ground
leasing, whereby the City leases land or buildings it owns to
a developer or business for a minimum base payment plus a
percentage of the income generated by the project or business or some other arrangement.
There are several advantages to ground leasing
as a means of public/private
partnership in commercial development.
If the project is
-120-

�successful, the City can recover all of its costs plus additional revenues.
Ground leases can be subordinated - the
City can mortgage its interest in the property as security
for a development loan to the business or developer.
The
smaller capital investment required for leasing a space will
give a developer a better return on his or her investment.
Leasing also allows the City control over the way the property is developed or used, and offers flexibility by structuring
payments
to
meet
the
needs
of
the
project's
requirements for cash flow.
,- ,

' .

Special assessment taxes are another means of financing
public improvement which, in turn, can lead to further private development.
Special assessment districts require the
approval of the majority of the property owners in the proposed district.
Since this is, in essence, a self-imposed
tax, there is little likelihood of approval of a downtown
assessment district unless the projects it is intended to
fund are regarded by those property owners as necessary.
Such a district is beneficial if the improvements lead to
increased business, and it is established only for a specified period of time, unless it is approved by the property
owners as an ongoing assessment.
Another way to finance programs and promote small business
development at a local level is the creation of a Community
Development Corporation (CDC), which is a nonprofit, private
and city-based organization.
Its main purpose is to involve
low income residents in the long-term and comprehensive
development of their communities.
CDCs participate in programs related to housing rehabilitation, commercial revitalization, infrastructure development,
job
training,
planning,
and
financial
and
technical
assistance for small businesses.
Some of the advantages of this type of organization include
no bureaucratic constraints, use of local initiative to
address local needs, use of private development techniques
for public purposes, attraction of private resources and
reinvestment in the community.
The Alliance for Community
Development could be expanded to become a community wide CDC.
Neighborhood areas could also create their own neighborhood
development corporation.

-121-

�•

I

;

'
\

.

SECTI.ON V
INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

�INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT

Goal
Provide for substantial and diversified clean industrial
growth in the Eaton Rapids area through orderly placement of
land uses and strengthened local organization.
Objectives
A.

Increase the
the area •

B.

Increase industrial employment.

C.

Prevent or minimize polluting effects of industrial
developments.

l ..

.,
'

L .. 1

number of diversity of

industries

in

Policies
the
use
the
and

1.

Encourage noncyclical industries to locate in
Eaton Rapids area in
accordance with the land
plan and at a rate which is consistent with
ability to provide housing, services, utilities
amenities.

2.

Locate industrial uses in areas which have the
necessary transportation carrying capacities, while
preventing industrial development in environmentally
sensitive areas such as wetlands and adjacent to the
Grand River.
Land Use

The general
provide the
diversified
of land uses

goal of the industrial development plan is to
City of Eaton Rapids with a substantial and
clean industrial base through orderly placement
and strengthened local organizations.

The proposed land use plan denotes approximately twice as
much area to industrial use than what currently exists.
Primarily this is in the southeastern portion of the City
utilizing the existing industrial area, including the City's
ind us trial park and a large vacant tract.
The only other
ind us trial activity in the City will occur on the parcel
located on Brook Street between the intersections of Brook
and Knight streets and Brook and Main Street.
This is currently occupied by Michigan Packaging Company and several
single-family homes. The designation of this entire block as
industrial allows for additional expansion of the existing
industrial activities as necessary.
In addition, a parcel
that is currently used for warehousing on W. Knight Street
north of the Old Athletic Field will continue to be used as
such.
-122-

�Locations in the City which are currently devoted to warehouse uses are to remain relatively unchanged under the new
plan. Land containing warehouse uses are oriented around the
railroad tracks (no longer in use) and on the northwest
corner of the Central Business District (with industrial
uses).
Qualitative Description
The City's industrial activities, aside from the manufacturing and warehousing parcels on w. Knight and Brook
streets, will be concentrated in the southeastern portion of
the City.
This includes the 23 plus acre City industrial
park on Hamman Drive. Light manufacturing facilities are the
preference of local residents and this area should be devoted
primarily to such industry. Approximately 20 percent of this
97-1/2 acre area (or about 20 acres) should be set aside for
heavy
industry
to
be separated from light
industrial
activity.
The City's industrial park should be completely developed or
have development commitments before additional improvement
for industrial developments are made adjacent to the park.
The City, or a private developer, or nonprofit corporation,
should then purchase and, improve the property north of
Hamman Road for an industrial park, including street, water,
sewer and storm sewer improvements. The existing industrial
park currently has water, sanitary sewers and electric service.
Storm sewers should also be extended into this area.
Standards for landscaping, building design and noise and
vibration should be adopted and administered.
A buffer between the industrial area and surrounding land uses should be
maintained.
Such a buffer should consist of vegetation,
along with an adequately high earth berm.
In addition, heavy
industry should be separated from light industry by a major
entrance road and more strict setback requirements.
In effect, every effort should be made to limit, within
reason, negative environmental impacts associated with manufacturing activity within the industrial park and to maintain
high standards for design and siting of industrial buildings
and landscaping.
Implementation
The actions proposed to promote industrial development within
the City of Eaton Rapids are very similar to those proposed
for commercial development, in the sense that they are both
intended to attract investment into the City, and/or expand
businesses and industries already located in Eaton Rapids.

-123-

:::.:"

�At least two factors should be considered before any action
is implemented:
first, the need to identify the types of
industries
that
are
most
conducive
to
the
economic,
employment and physical characteristics of the Eaton Rapids
area; and secondly, an analysis should be conducted to identify the ef f ect:s (i.e. , environmental, social and economic)
these industries could have on the City.
Some of the actions recommended
goal are the following:
0

to

achieve

the

industrial

The EDC, or local development corporation,
should identify industries with a potential for
success within the area, and then contact
prospective companies - especially nonpolluting
industries - in order to promote their location
in Eaton Rapids.
Any marketing plan to promote the City must
consider the factors that affect the decision
of a firm when conducting a business location
search and selecting a site.
The necessity of
a new plant could be the result of an anticipated capacity shortfall, or any other factor
such as too many workers of an existing plant,
new production technology that requires a new
facility, improved proximity to markets, etc.
Although the selection process is different
depending on the factor that motivates the new
location, there are some common factors that
concern companies when making their decisions.
There are, among others: labor costs, transportation costs and facilities, proximity to raw
material sources, proximity to existing company
facilities and quality of life in the area.
For this
reason
it is
important
for the
City to maintain updated information about its
socio-economic conditions, and to prepare a
brochure that could be sent to prospective companies when required.
The effort to attract new industries into the
City should include a campaign with direct
mail, brochures with information, phone calls
to staff members of prospective companies and
even personal visits to the company.

0

Create some incentives in order to attract
industrial investment into the City, and retain
and expand those industries already located in
Eaton Rapids.
-124-

�The following are some of the incentives that
could be established: real property tax reduction, industrial revenue bonds, federal loan
guarantees, joint ventures and investment tax
credits.
The City currently has established
Tax Increment Finance programs for the downtown
area and industrial park.
o

Encourage industries to enter into voluntary
agreements to give hiring preferences to local
residents and to improve training programs.

Financing Programs for Industrial Development
Most of the financing programs mentioned for commercial
development could also be used to finance industrial development.
There are some programs, however, that are specific
for industries, such as the Base Industries Loan which is
offered by the Michigan Community Block Grant (CDB3).
At the local level, Industrial Development Bonds are used by
local governments for public improvements and industrial
projects.
Under Act 62 of 1963, local governments are
authorized to issue bonds whether an economic development
organization exists in the area or not. These types of bonds
do not require voter approval, as the principal and interest
of the bond is paid back through the revenue received from
the project after it is completed.
Other types of bonds are
general obligation bonds, which in most cases require approval by the voters, and special assessment bonds, which
require a public hearing before approval and are used to pay
for specific improvements to designated properties.

-125-

�,-·-

.

!

:.~

r-~

'.

r,

~

'r.

l:
I ,

t.

,!
l

I
i

i. ..•
t

i,

.

l- ~.

SECTION VI

'
I

•

SENSE OF COMMUNITY

�l.
,

SENSE OF COMMUNITY

r~
I

'

'

Characteristics such as size, configuration, architecture,
lakes, rivers, history, economy and public relations, makes a
city specific and unique.
They create a feeling of identity
among its residents and a sense of community that is required
to achieve social and economic development.
Goal
Preserve and encourage a strong sense of
the Eaton Rapids area.

"community" within

Objectives
L,

A.

Increase residents' participation
decision-making process.

in

the

City's

B.

Promote coordinated action among different community
entities in order to promote the economic development of the area.

c.

Retain and improve the aesthetic and architectural
characteristics of the City, preventing the destruction of landmark buildings and sites.

D.

Preserve the City's small town atmosphere.

Policies
1.

Provide residents from within each section of the
Eaton Rapids area the opportunity for input into
the decision-making process by periodically surveying
surrounding
township
residents
regarding
their concerns and impressions and establishing a
"town meeting" format for residents of the City.

2.

Provide guidance to local commissions and boards
regarding their responsibilities and functions while
improving coordination among these bodies.
Coordinate with other units of government, nonprofit
agencies
and
developers/investors
to
promote
economic development in the Eaton Rapids area.

3.

Periodically review and update this comprehensive
plan to make it current with community needs and
conditions.

4.

Encourage
sites.

preservation

of

landmark

buildings

and

�Land Use

Each community has its own particular physical and environmental characteristics that give it its own unique identity.
Eaton Rapids has a distinct advantage over many other communities because of the
'island' on which the Central
Business District is located, the potential of its older commercial buildings and the quality of some of its residential
areas.
The City needs to capitalize upon these elements to
retain and enhance its sense of community.
Improving and
rehabilitating the downtown area, appropriately emphasizing
the Grand River and Spring Brook with walkways, boardwalks,
landscaping, boating facilities and improvements to the rear
of buildings in the Central Business District, concentrating
upon retaining and improving and expanding residential neighborhoods to make them more cohesive and identifiable, providing additional public and private recreation activities in
defined neighborhoods as well as the downtown area, creating
commercial areas on south Main Street that are compatible
with the small town environment Eaton Rapids desires to maintain and creating a district industrial area appropriately
designed and landscaped are all land use applications
intended to achieve a sense of commmunity.
Qualitative Description
Eaton Rapids currently retains a certain sense of community.
That is, its residents can identify with, and relate to, the
entire City as a unique area.
That sense of community,
however, is not as positive or as strong as it could be. The
major deterrents to a strong sense of community consist of:
a deteriorating Central Business District; lack of competition, choice and quality in commercial businesses;
absense, or lack of maintenance of some residences; an inadequate local employment base; inadequate recreation/entertainment f ac ili ties;
inadequate communication between local
government and residents.
This Plan proposes that those deterrents be eliminated or
minimized through coordinated efforts of the public and private sector.
Local citizen involvement in the formation and
operation of nonprofit community development organizations,
neighborhood organizations, and community sponsored volunteer
groups is a primary component in efforts to garner resident
investment in community development and increase overall
sense of community.
Local government related organizations,
such as the Downtown Development Authority and an Economic
Development Corporation can use state enabling legislation to
initiate improvements to commercial and industrial areas and
solicit potential commercial and industrial tenants.
The
City can help organize and advertise these organizations, as
well as promote overall coordination among these groups to

-127-

,r-"\

�to maximize efficiency and communication.
If these measures
are initiated and/or improved upon, the result will be
tangible, identifiable improvements to the physical and
social composition of the entire City.
These in turn will
create and enhance a positive sense of Eaton Rapids' unique
character.
i

' ,

Implementation
Recommended actions for the City of Eaton Rapids to achieve a
stronger sense of community are:
0

Once community organizations and committees
are established, the City should develop a
coordination progr·am whereby these groups are
continuously apprised of each others activities
and hold meetings at a specified time where
these organizations, as a whole, can provide
feedback and recommendations to the City,
including
the
City
Council
and
Plannin~
Commission.

0

The Planning Commission should define those
character is tics that make the City of Eaton
Rapids specific, authorizing only those new
developments that are compatible with them.

0

The Planning Commission should identify sites
and buildings that could be considered as
landmarks in order to prevent their des truetion.

0

The City Manager and the City Council could
promote the creation of nonprofit organizations
and committees formed by residents to participate
in
neighborhood
rehabilitation,
planning, economic promotion, etc.

0

Besides the preservation of the sense of community
related
with
the
physical
characteristics of the City, it is essential to
motivate citizen's participation in the decision making process.
Economic development
should be coordinated between the local government and private sector.
The ODA should provide the link between the City and downtown
businesses while separate groups be formed
representing the interests of non-CBD commercial businesses.
An EDC or Local Development
Finance Authority should be formed to oversee
the development and financing of industrial
activities in the City.

t·:-

•
-·(~
•·~

'·

i

-128-

�Financing Programs for Sense of Community
Various opportunities are available for enhancing a sense of
community within Eaton Rapids. The Local Initiatives Support
Corporation (LISC) is a nonprofit organization established to
provide funding and support to local nonprofit community
development corporations for housing and economic development.
LISC has recently established a statewide off ice in
Michigan.
The Michigan Community Builders Alliance is a
state program designed to fund various community economic and
social development efforts, including neighborhood revitalization.
Again, nonprofit community development corporations
play a key role in this program.
Local tax-generated revenues
for
downtown and industrial
improvements
can be
generated through Tax Increment Financing, via a DDA and/or
Local Development Finance Authority.
Other funding programs
designed to ultimately enhance community life and provide a
sense of community include United Way and the Michigan
Community Development Block Grant program.
The City should
continuously keep abreast of the various programs available
and orchestrate them into an overall strategic approach
toward community development.

-129-

�,.....
'\ .
L

•

,r--I
\.

'

,
!

'

l.. .
, ..
f

I

•

\..

SECTION VII
PARKS AND RECREATION

�•

PARKS AND RECREATION

Goal
Provide the City with an open space system, parks and
recreation facilities that are accessible, affordable, safe
and attractive to all residents.
f'"'

Objectives

r-

A.

Use existing spaces to provide outdoor
for the citizens of Eaton Rapids.

B.

Provide access for all to recreational activities
and facilities regardless of interest, age, sex,
income, cultural background, housing environment, or
handicap.

c.

Create parks and recreation facilities to meet the
needs of local residents of all ages.

D.

Integrate public recreation with all other public
services, such as education, heal th, and tr ansportation.

E.

Make recreational
requirements.

l

l.'

facilities

adaptable

recreation

to

future

Policies

I
\._.

1.

Evaluate and improve ( if necessary) existing park
sites,
and undertake annual evaluations,
maintenance,
and
adequate
replacement
of
existing
recreational facilities as needed.

2.

Develop municipal park and recreation facilities in
appropriate areas in accordance with concentrations
of population,
easy access,
environmental sensitivity and natural attractiveness.

3•

Encourage
the
development
recreational facilities.

4.

Design parks to enhance
recreation functions.

5.

Establish a network of trails (pedestrian, bicycle,
etc.) throughout the City, linking parks and recreation areas.

-BO-

of

private

neighborhoods

and

sector
serve

�6.

Develop a requirement for any new residential development to dedicate land or pay a park fee for public
parks, based upon the impact of that development on
capacity of existing park facilities.

7.

Create a park logo and a consistent design for park
signs and furniture.
Land Use

The proposed land use plan provides the City with elements
that are necessary to achieve the goal and the objectives
associated with parks and recreation.
The overall goal of
the parks and recreation plan is to provide the City with an
open space system and with parks and recreation facilities
that are accessible, affordable, safe and attractive to all
residents.
The existing park and recreation system in the City will
remain intact under the new Plan, along with the dedication
of a number of additional areas.
Primarily, this includes
adding a large tract of land along the City's western border
- contiguous with the existing athletic fields and including
Spring Brook.
This site is essentially to remain as a
natural open space area, to include a pedestrian/bike path.
A large parcel along the Grand River between North East
Street and a residential section on North Michigan Street is
also to be reserved as natural open space.
Another vacant
parcel on the Grand River off of Water Street, south of
Blake, is proposed as an additional open space area, and a
large parcel between Lake Street and the City's western
boundary is to be set aside as open space.
Over 170 acres
( 8. 4% of the City's incorporated area) are scheduled to be
devoted to recreation and natural open space, not including
school facilities. This is an increase of 150 acres over the
existing area allocated to recreation and open space use.
The land use plan also proposes a bike/pedestrian route
throughout the
.aol:
cit ·rvoi ;fewv efEf-:,i-:,..1 hhn ·f; oit
location of parks and river areas, providing easy access to
various social and cultural amenities throughout the area.
Qualitative Description
The intent of this Plan is to identify and formalize those
areas of the City that are to be used for recreation and o~en
space preservation.
The improvement and use of the City's
natural resources for the enjoyment of the City's residents
and visitors will substantially add to the quality of life in
Eaton Rapids.
Areas where soils will not allow development,
such as the large open space site adjacent to Spring Brook on
the City's western boundary, are best preserved and utilized

-131-

�as natural areas for the enjoyment of the general public.
The construction of pathways in these areas, perhaps with
interpretive sig nage, would open those areas to the community. Obviously, policies and programs must be adopted and
administered to minimize abuse and vandalism.

,__

,...
I

•

A major component of the City's park/open space system is the
development of a linear parkway/open space area adjacent to
the Grand River.
While it may not be possible to construct
hiking/biking paths along the entire length of the City's
river system, efforts should be made to make those improvements wherever possible.
Particular attention should be
paid to the downtown area, where boardwalks, lighting and
outdoor dining/entertainiment should be developed, emphasizing the river.
Controlled nonmotorized boating on the
river should also be encouraged in this area.
Private recreation facilities, roller skating rink and other
similar indoor activities, should be encouraged to locate
within the City, preferably the Central Business District.
Implementation
Open space, parks and recreation facilities are very important for a community, in the sense that they make life in the .
City more enjoyable and attractive.
The following are some
programs that should be implemented by the City.
0

i'
I

Eaton Rapids should rehabilitate or develop
much of its open space, creating parks and
various types of recreation f ac ili ties, such
as bike paths, jogging and walking courses,
playgrounds, etc.
To ensure those facilities, the City should
establish a recreation capital improvements
program, identifying specific projects and
their associated costs and revenue sources as
well as project phasing.
Those capital improvements should be in conjunction with the
recreational improvements identified in the
future land use element and be built upon the
City's Park and Recreation Plan.
This includes a proposed paved bike path,
which can also be used as a jogging and
walking course.
This bike path would connect
different parks and open spaces within the
City, using the abandoned railroad right-ofway and following the City waterways through a
linear open parkway.

-132-..

�0

The City Council could create incentives for
the private sector to develop recreation facilities around the City, including requiring
recreational facilities to be included in residential developments as a prerequisite for site
plan approval, if it is determined such development would create additional recreation demands that the City cannot immediately provide.

In addition, in 1989 the Parks and Recreation Department has
established the following projects to be completed in both the
short-and long-term.
Short-Term:
1.

Rebuild Island Wall.
Get the community involved in fund
raising.
Locate additional funding through grants, foundations, etc.

2.

Purchase the railroad property at the Old Athletic Field.

3.

Establish green areas in the south end, to include the
intersections of Kyle &amp; s. Main St. and Kyle &amp; Kinneville.

Long-Term:
1.

Purchase the railroad property across
from the Old
Athletic Field.
Expand the r i verwalk from Spring Brook
to W. Plains Street.

2.

Provide lighting and fencing on diamond #5.*

3.

Expand the riverwalk, to include DDA plans.

4.

Establish a roadside park in the Industrial Park on lots
A, B, or C.
*Short-term goal #2 must be accomplished before this can be
done.
Financing Programs for Parks and Recreation

At the state level, projects related with recreation can be
financed using the Michigan Natural Resources Trust Fund
(N.R.T.F.), which replaced the Michigan Land Trust Fund in
1985.
The overall goal of the NRTF is to financially assist
both the purchase of land for recreation uses, or the protection of the land because of its environmental importance or
scenic beauty.
Local funding sources for land purchase and/or site improvements include fraternal organizations, a locally generated
recreation trust fund, and general obligation bonds.
-13'.l-

�i

t ..

. -'I

t
(.

r

\.

' .·

f .

!
L.,_

SECTION VIII
TRANSPORTATION
,.
\
I

f
'

��TRANSPORTATION
' .

i
I

Goal

'

Provision of safe, efficient, and accessible transportation
methods and facilities available to all residents of the community which are compatible with land uses and minimize
intermodel conflicts and negative environmental inputs.
I

•

I

Objectives
A.

the efficient use of existing transportation facilities . while providing for a variety of
public-transportation modes
as
desirable
alternatives to the automobile.

B.

Develop an integrated network of streets,
and pedestrian paths in the community.

C.

Implement street standards for new development which
promotes optimum, safety and design relationships
and result in construction and maintenance economies.

D.

Improve and maintain the City's road system.

L.

/'"

i

Maximize

bikeways

Policies

'

1.

Make every effort
to insure that the transitdependent public will be served, including efficient
inter-system scheduling.

2.

Provide higher levels of transit service to the community by improving the routing, headways, transit
facilities, hours of operation, and the structure of
public transportation.

3•

Upgrade, improve and maintain parking areas in and
around commercial areas, while amending the zonin3
ordinance to apply specific parking standards and
requirements for all types of development within the
City.

4.

Prepare and implement a plan to improve the accessibility,
convenience,
and
efficiency
of
public
transportation in the City, and investigate various
alternative methods for financing transportationrelated improvements.

5.

Prepare, adopt, and keep up-to-date
parking plan for the City.

.

,.,

l

I

I

.

,· -

-134-

a

traffic

and

�6.

Provide bicyclists with a safe and convenient means
of traveling to, through, and within the City.

7.

Create a barrier-free environment
and avoids intermodel conflict.

8.

Develop a sidewalk plan that contains standards and
guidelines specifying where, when, and what type of
facilities should be provided (including barrierfree),
including
improving
pedestrian
crossing
safety and convenience.

9.

Create a pedestrian/transit/bicycle oriented CBD and
limit the use of all alleyways to delivery vehicles,
bicyclists, and pedestrians.

10.

Increase the efficiency of intersections through
improved signalization procedures and construction
of turning lanes.

11.

Include a bicycle lane in each direction along
major roads.

12.

Continue to require and construct path ramps at all
intersections and crosswalks on new sidewalks and
streets.

13.

Improve existing municipal,
in a cost-effective manner.

14.

Expand the City's road system to allow for easy
access to proposed residential areas and accommodate
future residential and commercial development as
needed.

15.

Improve transportation connections between the east
and west sides of the City.

that discourages

new

county and state roads

Land Use

The transportation plan for Eaton Rapids is formulated to
achieve the goal of providing the City with safe, efficient
and
accessible
transportation
methods
and
facilities
available to all residents of the community, being compatible
with land uses and minimizing intermodel conflicts and negative environmental impacts.
The objectives of the transportation plan are:
1.

maximize the efficient use of existing transportation facilities while providing for a
variety of public-transportation modes as
desirable alternatives to the automobile;

-135-

�2.

develop an integrated network of streets,
bikeways ana pedestrian paths in the community.

3.

implement street standards for new development
which promote optimum safety and design relationships and result in construction and maintenance economies; and

4.

improve and maintain the city's road systems.

,r.

l .J

'

I.

\

&lt;

.

The major street plan is essentially the transportation element of the Comprehensive Plan, based primarily on the Street
and Road Analysis completed earlier in the text.
This element is structured to prqvide general transportation goals
for all transportation-related activities in the City, along
with specific objectives, strategies and actions.
Because of its obvious importance in the functioning of
today's society, a solid transportation analysis and plan
must be integrated with the land use plan.
The planning of
an efficient road network in Eaton Rapids, and recommendations for solving existing traffic problems, will help
ensure a system which is able to accommodate future traffic
as the City changes and grows.
Overal~, the City's existing composition of artery, collector
and local streets will remain intact, with the major changes
associated with extensions of local streets into undeveloped
areas and the possible upgrading of some local streets to
become collector streets, as future development warrants.
Since a great deal of Eaton Rapids is still undeveloped, a
specific street system does not exist along the perimeter of
most of the City.
Roads which have been recently added on
the east for new development, and those proposed for the
future, are all local streets.
Angling (nonlinear) street
systems should be encouraged in future residential development to contribute to design aesthetics and deter excess
speed.
All existing unpaved streets should be paved, and
improved with curb and gutter.
Assuming a general increase in traffic volumes for each area
of the City in the near and distant future, a much more indepth traffic analysis should be undertaken by the City.
This is especially critical for areas of the City which are
designated for more commercial development and higher density
residential uses, which will generate more traffic.

•

A study with greater detail will also be able to include specific planning principles.
This involves the development of
certain standards for the various types of streets
(width,
parking, movement, signage, etc), and the coordination of a
local plan with adjacent municipalities and with regional and
state planning agencies.
-136-

�,i._ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

@

----hi

I

usn.

• I

I

l
I

I

I

I

-r-CITY OF

EATON RAPlbS
EATON COUNTY, MICHIGAN

EATON RAPIDS COMPREHENSIVE DEVELOPMENT PLAN
legend

MAP 18
FUTURE STREET PLAN

STREET CLASSIFICATIONS

ARTERIAL
Z2.ZZZllZZ2Z

COLLECTOR

@

LOCAL

- 137-

Gove Associates Inc.

�,_,.

.

'
r

,: J

..

As part of a thorough traffic analysis, a detailed investigation of existing and future parking demands is needed.
As
the City grows and more activities take place, an increased
parking demand will be felt by both residents and visitors.
Because of the possible diversity of activities in the City,
the demands for parking will fluctuate (i.e., the greatest
demand for parking spaces will not always occur during business hours).
Specific points in the City will have to be
identified and improved as vehicular parking lots and new
development (or alterations to existing structures) should
meet approved parking requirements as presented in the text
of the Zoning Code.
Downtown merchants have already voiced
their concern regarding an inadequate parking system.
The construction of sidewalks, curbs and gutters along
existing streets that do · not contain these improvements,
should be a priority item related to street improvements.
At the same time, all new development should be required to
include these amenities.
Sidewalk maintenance programs,
funded by both the City and property owners, should be used
to ensure safe and functional walKways.

i

'

Because a transportation plan is not limited solely to individual vehicular traffic,
mention should also be made of
public transportation, bicyclists, service/delivery vehicles
and pedestrian walkways.
Although these four forms of
transportation account for only a small portion of the area's
total traffic volume, they are an integral part of any City
fabric - especially in a community the size of Eaton Rapids.
The harmonious functioning of these elements are essential to
the City so that it does not become predominately vehicularoriented.
As City streets are constructed or expanded, ample
provision should be made to accommodate bicyclists and
pedestrians. Further, the land use plan calls for a bicycle/
pedestrian path throughout
the City which
is free of
motorized vehicles.
To serve those residents who prefer (or
are dependent upon) public transportation, the City should
explore and maximize the most efficient use of these
facilities.
Qualitative Description
The previously completed Street and Road Analysis identified
a number of problem areas in the City.
It also presented
goals and objectives, strategies and actions to follow which
will help remedy these situations and guide the City in the
future.
In summary, this includes:

•

Problem Areas:
Vehicular congestion downtown
1.
Conflict between various forms of traffic
2.
Poor street alignment
3•
Lack of sufficient parking
4.
Poor condition and/or lack of pedestrian walks
5.
-138-

�6.
7.

Community is too 'vehicular-oriented'
Lack of
standards/regulators
to guide trafficrelated issues during and after development and
during short- and long-range planning.

Proposed Changes:
Build new bridge across Grand River to connect
1.
Michigan Street with North East Street.
Explore and establish new parking standards and
2.
requirements
Identify and use specific areas for parking lots,
3.
ramps, etc., making use of various forms (i.e., permit parking, metered, commuter lots, shoppers only,
etc . )
Establish and institute standards for pedestrian
4.
walks and bicycle paths
Provide for maximum use of EATRAN and other public
5.
transportation facilities
Purchase available Michigan Central railroad right6.
of-way for construction of local and collector
streets between Hyatt and West streets and as an
extension of Kimbark Avenue southeast to the City
Limits.
Implementation
Improvements in transit facilities such as streets, sidewalks, sig nali za tion, lighting and parking spaces, are a
prerequisite for economic development.
For this reason it
is important to implement the following actions:
o

The City of Eaton Rapids should improve street
conditions.
According to recent information provided by
the City of Eaton Rapids there is a total of
24,495 feet of streets that require improvements, which represents around 16 percent of
the total street area in the City.
These
improvements should be included in a street
and
roads
capital
improvements
program.
Special assessments, Act 51 revenues, and tax
increment financing programs, as well as allocations from the City's general fund represent
various
means
of
conducting
street
and
sidewalk repairs and improvements.

0

The City Council could create a program to
increase the number of parking spaces in and
around commercial areas of the City of Eaton
Rapids.

�Such a program should include the identification of possible sites and a study of
the feasibility of purchasing those sites and
their adaptation to parking spaces.

1,

0

;

'

.

• ••t.

A comprehensive bike route should be laid out
within the City, utilizing separate bike paths
and bike lanes in appropriate areas.
The construction of bicycle routes within the
City, connecting downtown with some neighborhoods around the City, is a complementary
action associated with both transportation and
recreation.
The development of this system
should be identified in a long-range capital
improvements program, specifying those increments to be constructed or designated during
each year of the program.
Financing Programs for Transportation

The U.S. Department of Transportation provides funds that can
be used to develop a community's infrastructure and improves
its communications network.
Funds are available through the
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and the Urban Mass
Transportation Administration (UMTA).
Two of its programs
are the Capital Improvement Grant, which helps finance the
purchase, construction, reconstruction and improvement of
equipment and facilities for use in mass transportation service in both urban and nonurban areas; and Section 5, Capital
and Operating Assistance Formula Grants, which has the same
purpose as the Capital Improvements Grant Program, but provides additional aid for payment of operating expenses.
Publicly and privately owned operators of mass transportation
services are eligible to apply for this program.
The Michigan Transportation Economic Development Fund is a
recently passed piece of legislation that provides revenues
to meet the demands that economic development places on highways, roads and streets.
This program is available to local
government units (such as Eaton Rapids) having roadway
responsibility as well as to the Michigan Department of
Transportation.
There are six categories that qualify for
funding:
1) highway projects related economic development
projects; 2) additions to the state trunkline system; 3)
reduction of congestion on primary county roads and major
city streets within counties with a population greater than
400,000; 4) road improvements in counties with a population
of 400,000 or less to create an all-season road network; 5)
construction/reconstruction of roads essential to development
of commercial forests; and 6) road and street improvements in
cities in counties with a population of 400,000 or less.
Categories one and six would be applicable to Eaton Rapids.
-·140-

�,., ...

'!.·.·

I .

I .

l
\

~

I

i.

!.

SECTION IX
PUBLIC FACILI.TIES, SCHOOLS, SERVICES

�PUBLIC FACILITIES, SCHOOLS AND SERVICES

Goal
' ,

Improve the area's existing public and cultural facilities to
accommodate existing needs and provide additional facilities
and services to serve present and future population.
Objectives

l.
f

i

A.

Provide adequate public facilities
(i.e. water,
sewer, etc.) to allow vacant areas to develop as
indicated on the proposed land use plan.

B.

Ensure that all public facility improvements provide
Eaton Rapid's residents with the highest social and
economic benefits and the least amount of negative
impacts on the environment (air, water, noise,
etc. ) •

C.

Maximize the extended use of existing public facilities for year-round and evening use.

D.

Promote the development of schools and institutions
for post-high school education.

E.

Provide transportation and recreation opportunities
in proximity to centers of student population.

F.

Encourage use of public school sites for
and - after - school child care.

i .:

before

Policies

\

1.

Construct feeder systems for water and sewer to
serve selected vacant areas, to be paid for by those
who would benefit in an equitable manner.

2.

Reduce any sewage
Grand River.

3.

Provide separate sanitary and storm sewers for all
new development, and take action to separate any
existing combination systems.

4.

Ensure that the Planning Commission reviews all
public works projects for environmental, economic,
social and land use impacts.

5.

Place new elementary school sites in centrally
located areas of residential development; schools
should not be located on arterials.

l

'-

overflows

-14!.;._

or

dumping

into

the

�6.

To provide adequate space for cultural
for which there is a demonstrated need.

activities

7.

Provide for adequate office and maintenance facilities for City government functions, which are easily
accessible to the general public.
Land Use

Public Administration
The City should see little to no change in its form and hierarchy of municipal administration.
As the City expands in
both development and population, additional employees will
probably be required, especially in public safety and public
service (e.g. blue collar employment} jobs. However, at this
time the primary concern seems to be the consolidation of
City facilities and buildings.
It has been indicated
that
grouping of services and employee work stations/offices would
provide a greater benefit to the public as a whole.
Public Safety
The City police and fire departments should have relatively
few changes in the future, other than to maintain their
existing facilities and remain up to date in their procedures. They may face the possibility of an expanded staff in
the future, as the population of the City rises.
Schools
Assuming the number of school children in the Eaton Rapids
system increases proportionally to the projected total population of the area, the City will contribute an additional
131 students in the next twenty years ( 4. 3% increase).
The
existing facilities should be adequate to accommodate this
increase.
However, looking at the total planning area which includes Hamlin and Eaton Rapids Townships - an addition of approximately 645 students could be realized.
This
may produce a significant change among teachers and apministrators, as well as cramped facilities and resources.
Educational administrators and staff should now be looking at
different areas in the City and Townships where new development is likely to occur.
These areas should be given high
priority for the establishment of a neighborhood school concept.
At the same time, consideration should be given to
design standards for additions and/or new facilities at
existing structures and grounds.

-142-

�Library
I,

The Eaton Rapids library could be significantly more successful with a little more community involvement and a reactivation of former support groups.
With the space opportunities for expansion possible, more supplies and materials
could be available for library users.
Additionally, cooperative privileges
could be
expanded,
providing
greater
resources for the residents of the area.
To help produce a higher quality and more successful library,
funds should be collected from the Townships.
This will
supplement the current funding sources: general fund, state
aid, and penal fines.
A concentrated effort should also be
made to reestablish - and maintain - specific support groups
such as the Friends of the Library.
Social Services
The Senior Citizen Office in Eaton Rapids appears to be successful in serving senior citizens in the area, as a wide
range of programs and activities are offered to older citizens.
A variety and diversity of events (luncheons/dinners,
educational seminars, trips, home meal delivery, counseling,
etc.) are scheduled to appeal to a wide range of the seniors
in the community.
Funding for these programs, however, is
inadequate at this time, particularly in regard to staffing
at the Center.
Revenues are provided through the United
Fund, Tri-County Office of Aging, the City of Eaton Rapids,
Eaton Rapids Public Schools, and various capital producing
projects which the citizens stage themselves.
The VFW National Home appears to be adequately serving its
purpose, although on a much larger scale. Located outside of
the City, the Home still impacts upon the residents of the
area as it provides housing, schooling, and other services to
single parents and children.
Volunteer ism is becoming a more important element in providing social services to the general public, particularly at
a time when federal programs devoted to social programs are
decreasing.
To coordinate and facilitate volunteer efforts
in Eaton Rapids, local nonprofit social service organizations
should form a "volunteer bank".
Such a program would act as
a clearinghouse for residents who wish to provide their time
and effort in the community.
Medical Services
Existing medical services appear adequate to serve the community.
This includes the hospital on south Main Street,
ambulance service from Charlotte, the Springport Medical
Clinic, and the Eaton Rapids Medical Clinic.
-143--

�Water Supply and Distribution Network
The existing system has an "excess capacity of approximately
800 persons, which could be increased to approximately 1,700
persons by replacing the plant's high service pumps with new
units.
This project would cost between $50 and $75 thousand
(1988 dollars).
With respect to the distribution system,
the existing
transmission main network (8, 10, 12 inch water mains)
requires several improvements to complete the arterial
transmission loop around and through the City water service
area.
Additional storage capacity is also required to
supplement
the
present
250,000
gallon
storage
tank.
Accordingly, the Water Distribution Network Analysis2 recommended the construction of a storage facility (at Greyhound
Drive)
in conjunction with the proposed southern loop
transmission main (8, 10, 12 inch). The project has an estimated cost of $1,425,000 (1987 dollars).
Storm Sewer System
The storm sewer master plan for the City of Eaton Rapids was
presented in 19783, but as little has been done, the plan is
still valid.
In this plan the City is divided into eleven
sections and each one is analyzed according to the existing
sewer system, recommending some improvements when they are
required.
There are three developments that need special
attention:
construction of a trunk sewer in Jackson Street
in order to attend the needs of the industrial area,
construction of a new trunk sewer along Forest and Leonard
streets, and construction of a sewer in Hall, Knight and Mill
streets, to solve problems in the downtown area.

2capitol Consultants, "Water Distribution Network Analysis
for the City of Eaton Rapids, Michigan".
(May, 1987)
3capitol Consultants, "Storm Sewer Master Plan, City of Eaton
Rapids, Michigan".
(March, 19 78)

-144-

�t ..•

Sanitary Sewer System
According to the capacity of the wastewater treatment facilities, prepared by private consultants for the City of Eaton
Rapids (March, 1988) 4, all interceptor sewers have adequate
capacity to handle present flows, except the River Crossing
sewer.
The siphons of this sewer should be replaced with
larger siphons, with an estimated cost of between $75,000 and
$100,000 (1988).
On the other hand, the wastewater treatment plant has to be
upgraded in order to expand its hydraulic loading and its
organic treatment capacity, which is overloaded due to
industrial waste.
An alternative action to reduce organic
loadings (and costs) is the implementation of the Industrial
Pretreatment Program ( IPP).
Costs without IPP would be in
the range of $740,000 and $1,050,000, while implementing IPP,
costs would be reduced to the range of $305,000 to $485,000
(1988 dollars).
Solid Waste Disposal

iI '.

In the future, the City may wish to consider public pickup
of the solid waste generated by residents and businesses.
This is generally funded through property taxes, although
various alternatives are available.
However, at this time,
private hauling of waste appears acceptable for the City.
Residential, commercial and industrial recycling should be
encouraged.
To facilitate recycling, the City should study
the feasibility of providing a collection facility for
recyclable materials to the general public.
Cemetery

', ..

Rose Hill Cemetery adequately serves the community's needs,
and should continue to do so in the future.
If expansion is
ever necessary, enough land is available on different sides
to significantly increase the cemetery size.
Qualitative Description

I '

i

i..

The City's infrastructure must be maintained to ensure
existing residents and businesses are adequately served and
expanded to meet future demand as well as to promote the City

4capitol Consultants, "Capacity Evaluation water Supply and
Wastewater Treatment Facilities, City of Eaton Rapids,
Michigan."
(March, 1988)

-145-

�• I

in attempts to attract new development and investment.
At
the same time, Eaton Rapids, as other cities, has limited
financial resources to provide such facilities and services.
Consequently, each facility and program that is proposed
requiring municipal funds should be thoroughly reviewed to
determine if it can be efficiently utilized for more than one
purpose.
All of the City government's real property should be maintained and improved to meet changing demands and functional
design requirements.
City Hall should be a priority in a
municipal program for capital improvements.
The existing
facility should be studied to determine if it could or should
be renovated and remodeled, or if a new City Hall should be
constructed.
Aside from the City Hall, police station,
library and all other municipal facilities should be adequate
to serve the City's needs over the next 20 years.
Maintenance and ( in the case of water, stormwa ter and sanitary
sewer lines) expansion of existing facilities should be the
primary focus of municipal operation over the planning
period.
Implementation
To maintain, expand and, in some cases, upgrade the City's
facilities
and
services,
the
following
implementation
measures are suggested:
o

Develop
a
five
year
capital
improvements
program, utilizing City officials and private
sector representatives to provide recommendations for specific projects.

o

Review and revise, as necessary, the City's
policies and standards for new residential,
commercial and industrial development as they
pertain to municipal infrastructure.

o

Work with the City's senior center and areawide
Council on Aging to increase the level of
funding available to the Center. One possibility would be to expand funding sources to
include the townships of Eaton Rapids and
Hamlin, since seniors living in these townships
have access to the Senior Center.

0

Coordinate with Eaton Rapids Public Schools to
maximize the use of the school district's
resources, including education and recreation
facilities
and
programs,
for
the
City's
residents.

-146- ·
:::;

�0

Meet with school representatives to discuss
the establishment of an after-school day care
program for children of working parents using
school facilities.
Study the potential of
utilizing senior citizens (particularly those
associated with the Senior Center) to staff
after-school day care.

0

Require that all major public works capital
by
the
improvement
projects
be
reviewed
Planning Commission for coordination of consistency with this Comprehensive Plan.

0

Establish an annual survey of City residents to
obtain feedback on attitudes and ideas and to
provide a mechanism for positive public relations.
Financing Programs for Public Facilities, School and
Services

The U.S. Department of Agriculture, through the Farmers Home
Administration, offers two different programs related to
public facilities and infrastructure.
These are, Community
Facility Loans and Water and Waste Disposal Systems for Rural
Communities. The first program is aimed at the construction,
extension, or improvement of community facilities that provide essential services to rural residents.
The second
program provides project grants and direct loans for new and
improved water and waste disposal facilities for rural communities (open country or towns with less than 10,000
population).
Public bodies and nonprofit corporations are
eligible applicants for these programs, however, there are
additional restrictions that have to be reviewed before
applying for a program.
At the state and local levels there are some programs that
have been mentioned before that could be used by the City of
Eaton Rapids to finance public facilities and infrastructure
related
projects.
Community
Development
Block
Grant
Programs, administered by the Michigan Department of Commerce
and MSHDA, provides resources for infrastructure and public
facilities improvements when linked to either economic development or targeted home improvement programs.
It has to be
stressed that the economic development grants administered by
the Michigan Department of Commerce are awarded based on the
impact the project will have on job creation.
Therefore,
those projects looking for financing resources from the CDBG
program have to be presented in a way that shows their linkages to the economic development of the community.

-147-

�A state program that can be used to finance local projects is
the Michigan Municipal Bond Authority (MMBA).
This program
was designed to provide Michigan municipalities with low
interest
bonds
by
using the state's high bond
market
rating.
The MMBA is authorized to issue bonds to make loans
to local communities through the purchase of municipal obligations.
This way municipalities do not have to enter the
bond market on their own, but combine with other local units
to gain access to highly rated low interest bond financing.
These resources could be especially useful to finance
infrastructure related projects such as water and sewer
system improvements.
At the local level the City could finance its infrastructure
and public facilities projects using local tax revenues, combined with federal and state loans and grants. General obligation bonds, special assessment bonds and revenue bonds
could be issued by the City to finance these programs.
In
addition, special tax assessments could be used.

..
l

0
'

-148-

�•

I

......
i .'
[
I

' .
!

' .

;
I

l

L .

'

.

'

.

'

SECTION X
COMMUNITY HEALTH AND SAFETY

�COMMUNITY HEALTH AND SAFETY

Goals

Provide adequate public health and safety programs facilities
and equipment through coordination among the City's service
providers.
Eliminate the hazards to health and safety that
may exist in the City.
Provide effective and economical
police, fire and emergency services to residents.
Ensure
that cost-effective social services are available in response
to public needs. Make adequate medical services available to
all residents.
Objectives
A.

Eliminate 75 percent of all existing hazards in the
City by 1995 which are detrimental to the heal th,
safety, and welfare of the residents.

B.

Prohibit potential hazards from developing.

C.

Increase public awareness of fire and other natural
hazards, and of methods to avoid or mitigate the
effects of these hazards.

D.

Insure that critical facilities will function during
and after a disaster.

E.

Ensure quality fire prevention and protection facilities and equipment,
and maintain or
increase
current performance levels of police, fire and
emergency personnel.

F.

Work with health providers to ensure consistent,
high quality health care to the City's residents and
promote health maintenance programs and events.

G.

Encourage volunteer ism within the community to
assist in providing health care to the elderly and
economically disadvantaged.

H.

Incorporate fire and crime protection measures into
development planning.

I.

Encourage the continuation and expansion of social
services necessary to serve Eaton Rapids residents,
including financially supporting these services provided locally that are determined to be costeffective in meeting local needs.

-149-

�Policies
1.

Coordinate information and programs with the City's
volunteer fire department to ensure that the department is aware of the most recent training, technology and equipment available.

2.

Establish an implementable and practical communitywide disaster response plan utilizing citizen input
and make every effort to educate the public about
the plan.

3.

Work with local health care providers to encourage
community-wide events that promote health maintenance for all age groups.

4.

Initiate a volunteer program that encourages local
health care professionals to donate time to provide
limited free examinations to economically disadvantaged residents.

5.

Work with the hospital to ensure continued operation

of

the

facility

and

expansion

of

health

care

programs.

6.

Encourage community-wide health and fitness programs
through public and private promotion and development
of public recreation/exercise facilities.
Land Use

The City has a valuable resource in the Eaton Rapids
Community Hospital.
That f ac il i ty should form the nucleus
for heal th care activities in the City and private medical
offices should be located adjacent to the hospital.
The
expansion of the City's recreation/open space areas will also
impact community health by providing facilities for walking,
jogging and biking.
School facilities should continue to be
available for recreation by local residents.
The fire
department and police department should remain within the
downtown area, to be easily accessible to all parts of the
City.
Senior centers and nursing care homes should be
located in areas designated for multiple-family development
and be within quick response distance to the hospital.
Qualitative Description
The provision of health and safety facilities and services is
a major component of community living.
An effective police
and fire department, as well as quality medical service, is
very important to most residents, particularly senior citizens.
The proliferation of crime, particularly in large

-150-

�,-

..,

cities, has made small community and rural living more
attractive to many people.
The perception of a particular
community as safe is one of the more important er i ter ia. a
person or household will use in the process of deciding to
relocate into that community.
Therefore, in attempt to
accommodate new development, the City should achieve and
maintain a reputation as a safe place in which to live.
At
the same time, every effort must be made to increase er ime
prevention measures to combat the predictable increase in
crime associated with increasing population.
Consequently,
the City, and its police and fire departments, should develop
programs to include the general public in crime prevention,
including education, and to work with th.e area's youth to
institute
alternatives
to
crime-related
activities
and
behavior.
Health maintenance should be strongly encouraged
within the City.
To promote heal th maintenance, the City
should work with the Eaton Rapids Community Hospital and
local physicians to establish a "health fair", to be held
over a one or two day period each year, with booths, displays
and exhibits regarding health care and health maintenance
principles, along with more conventional fair rides, food
booths, etc.
The City should also encourage a local organization to sponsor local exercise and fitness events, such as
a walk, fun-run and other similar activities.
The City should also adopt a housing maintenance code, with
inspection of rental units and possible inspection of owneroccupied uni ts upon sale of · the house.
A community-wide
disaster plan should be developed and widely advertised
throughout the community.
Other local events that promote
health and safety and increase the community's awareness of
health and safety practices should be encouraged and, as
necessary, initiated by the City, involving volunteers.
Implementation

The following actions related to heal th and safety, education, hazard prevention and social service effectiveness are
recommended:
1.

Identify existing hazards (i.e., poor intersections, high fire areas, etc.) and prepare an
elimination program by 1990,
involving
the
Planning Commission working with the Police,
Fire, and Engineering Departments to identify
alternative solutions and cost estimates.

2.

Implement and enforce various procedures and
standards
for
handling,
transporting,
and
disposing of hazardous materials throughout its
City.

-151.-

�3.

Review
all
new
developments
to
identify
possible safety and health hazards and impacts
on future capacity.

4.

Establish and enforce standards for noise, air,
and water quality/supply for existing and proposed development, and continue to monitor
their level of quality.

5.

Maintain an updated disaster response plan that
identifies and provides for essential emergency
facilities to ensure that they will function in
the event of a disaster.·

6.

Allow land uses in areas prone to natural
hazards only with appropriate mitigation procedures.

7.

Cooperate with other public agencies to store,
organize, distribute, and administer emergency
medical equipment, supplies, services, and communication systems.

8.

Have the Police Chief and Fire Chief annually
review the performance of their respective departments and other departments from which the
City
obtains
emergency
services
(i.e.,
paramedics).

9.

Expand the annual police and fire reports to
include a performance evaluation which would
cover such areas as response times, information
on public relations, lives saved or protected,
etc., and note any possible trends or future
problems due to new developments, shifting
population, etc.

10.

Ensure that the Police and Fire Departments
continue to train personnel in first aid and
CPR, and that classes in these areas be promoted through the schools.

11.

Require any agencies requesting funding to submit an annual performance report to the Council
and City Administrator.

12.

Prepare a
report which investigates costeffective alternatives in providing for the
needs of the public.

13.

Provide local information and referral service
for parents seeking child care.

-152-

�14.

Establish a volunteer network that will link
programs that require volunteer efforts with
local residents that desire to provide their
time and services.

15.

Establish a panel comprised of the police
chief, fire chief, building inspector and private
residents
to
develop
and
promote
a
community-wide disaster response and hazard
elimination plan.
Such a plan should identify
solutions to eliminate most existing hazards in
the City within a 10 year period.

16.

Adopt and enforce a municipal housing code that
is applicable to rental and owner-occupied
units.
vacant rental and owner-occupied units
should be inspected for code violations.

17.

Meet with Eaton Rapids Community Hospital
officials and local physicians to discuss the
possibility of establishing a "health fair".

18.

Meet with
local
businessmen and volunteer
groups to determine interest in establishing
and sponsoring an annual "fun-run".
Meet with
school and hospital officials to encourage them
to
co-sponsor
community
physical
fitness
programs and periodic physical fitness events.

19.

Meet with Ea ton Rapids Community Hospital and
physicians and their staff to encourage them to
donate their time ( annually or semi-annually)
to provide free health checkup services to
those residents that are economically disadvantaged.
The City or school district could Qrovide the facilities and promotional effort for
such a program.

20.

Establish a household hazardous waste collection program, whereby residents are encouraged
to drop-off their household hazardous wastes at
a specified time and location.
This should be
undertaken
in
conjunction with
the County
Health Department.

21.

with the fire and pol ice departments to
define and establish annual performance goals
and standards.
Work

Financing Programs for Community Health and Safety
As in the other elements called for in this Plan, financing
for community health and safety programs will consist of a

.:.J.53--

�combination of public and private funding sources.
Police
and fire capital and operation expenditures are included in
the City's annual budget.
Revenue is comprised primarily
from local property taxes and state shared revenue.
At the
present time, there are no available state and federal
programs designed specifically to assist in funding police
and fire protection.
Therefore, the primary source of revenue for these public safety components will continue to be
generated locally.
Major capital improvements, if needed,
could be funded through a general obligation bond issue.
This should, however, be a means of last resort.
The potential also exists of encouraging the judicial system to allow
the police department to confiscate the property of convicted
drug felons and sell such property for drug enforcement
revenue, and to require those convicted of driving under the
influence of alcohol to reimburse the community for the costs
of arrest and prosecution as well as victims of any accident
resulting from drunk driving.
Most of the programs and projects identified in this section
would be financed primarily from business and individual
contributions and volunteer labor.
In conjunction with this
local resource, fund-raising events, such as arts and craft
sales,
walk-a-thons
and
similar
activities
could
be
established.
The City should work with these volunteer
groups to encourage fund-raising events for health and safety
programs and ensure that they are coordinated.

-154-

�r

.
.

'·

tf
I -

!

;'
I

I

SECTION XI
NATURAL RESOURCES,
ENERGY CONSERVATION

�NATURAL RESOURCES, ENERGY CONSERVATION

Goal
To have a harmonious relationship between the natural environment and the activities of the Eaton Rapids community,
minimizing negative impacts of one upon the other to the
benefit of both.
Objectives
f -·

;

A.

Continue to develop recreational and cultural opportunities along the Grand River and Spring Brook in a
manner sensitive to the environment •

B.

Preserve and protect the rivers and streams in Eaton
Rapids in their natural state as open spaces,
natural resources, and habitats.

C.

Use waterways as a starting /focal point when considering
adjacent
land
uses,
redevelopment
of
existing areas, and new development.

D.

Regulate, provide, and monitor controls on urban
development relative to soil conditions, ground
cover, and climate in Eaton Rapids.

E.

Recycle solid waste when possible and promote
conservation of nonrenewable energy resources.

..

'

,I@
,.

the

Policies
1.

Continue to emphasize the Island Park and its linkage to the downtown.

2.

Adopt appropriate modifications
(i.e.
control plan), and institute a flood plain
ment ordinance to reflect requirements
Federal Flood Insurance Program,
along
natural resources management plan.

3.

Maintain wetland areas (marshes, swamps, bogs, etc.)
as a naturally occurring habitat for many biotic
species.

4.

Provide for the retention of natural vegetation in
all areas of the City, primarily in areas with new
development, and establish screening requirements
for all new developments.

5.

Carefully control all activities and development in
the floodway and floodplain.
-155.:.

erosion
manageof the
with a

�r----.
6.

Improve the quality of water in the Grand River and
its tributaries, while monitoring water levels and
reducing peak flood flow rates, as necessary.

7.

Encourage water-orientated activities/recreation in
and around waterways, including river routes for
biking, jogging, etc.

8.

Emphasize and ensure public access to the waterways
in Eaton Rapids, where feasible.

9.

Provide safe and adequate access across waterways
for motorists, bicyclists, and pedestrians.

10.

Identify specific areas in the City which would
provide greater visibility to the waterways, and
develop the areas accordingly.

11.

Encourage and ·manage public and private plantings to
create and preserve tree cover in the ·City, while
maintaining the functional aspects of plant materials (microclimate).

12.

Provide land use controls (zoning, site plan review)
which permit appropriate flexible design responses
to existing soil conditions and problems.

13.

Preserve and protect the waterways in the City by
monitoring existing and proposed development for the
type and amount of waste/discharge of any kind into
the rivers.

14.

Continue to provide specific open areas in the City
(primarily undeveloped land due to poor soils,
heavily wooded areas, etc.).

15.

Investigate the aquisi tion of property rights, and
provide specific development controls to protect
environmentally sensitive areas.

16.

Promote solid waste recycling.

17.

Encourage conservation of energy consumption.

18.

Establish
gram.

19.

Encourage volunteer interest and involvement in recycling.

an

areawide recycling

-156-

facility

and pro-

�Land Use

r,
j .

The future land use element of this plan identifies those
areas of the City that are to be set aside for open space and
recreation.
The majority of that land (150 acres) or about
86 percent of all land devoted to open space and recreation
will be preserved in its natural state.
Linear greenbelts
along both sides of the Grand River and surrounding Spring
Brook are major components of the open space system.
The
intent of preserving these areas as natural open spaces is to
protect encroachment of development upon the City's river
system while opening them up to public use, as well as define
those areas that are undevelopable and establish them as formal natural preserve areas for use by the community.

\.

Qualitative Description

The system of open space and recreation land within the City
will be designed to integrate formal active and passive
recreation with open space preservation and conservation.
The City's existing parks will continue to exist and contain
amenities such as ball diamonds, playground equipment and
picnicing facilities.
About one-half of the area designated
as natural, open space will be limited to hiking/biking
trials, interpretive signage and limited picnicing facilities.
More specifically, pathways should be constructed
where possible, along the Grand River within the linear
greenbelt, primarily from State Street north to the City's
northern limits.
The linear. greenbelt on the southside of
Spring Brook and the large acreage designated as open space,
west of Hyatt Street will be preserved as natural open area,
with improvement limited to a walking/biking path, interpretive signs and possibly picnic areas.
The open space area
west of Lake Street will in essence remain undeveloped and
possibly linked to the open space site south of Brook Street
at a later point in time.
The designated open space areas
east of north Michigan and east of Water Street will also
remain unimproved for the duration of the Plan.
New development will be reviewed for approval utilizing established criteria and standards for preserving open spaces within such
development.
Implementation

To establish a coordinated open space/recreation system, the
City should take the following steps:
1.

Establish a citizen committee to recommend specific sites that should be preserved as open
space.

-157-

�2.

The committee should undertake a detailed
analysis of the general areas (as well as other
possible sites) identified in this Plan to
determine their desirability and potential as
open space/natural areas.

3.

The City should accept and review the results
of the committee study and recommendations and
establish a schedule for acquisition.

4.

The resultant acquisition projects should be
incorporated into the City's capital improvement programs.

5.

The City will establish site plan review standards for new planned residential, commercial
and
industrial
development
that
considers
natural preservation of appropriate areas on
the site.

Financing for Natural Resources, Energy Conservation
Acquisition of larger parcels for greenbelt and open space
preservation should utilize the Michigan Natural Resources
Trust Fund as a primary funding source.
Other statewide
environmental organizations should also be contacted to
determine the potential for obtainin9 their financial or professional assistance.
Private developers required to provide open space within
their developments will incur the costs of preserving these
areas (i.e. opportuntiy costs that have been lost by not
utilizing the land for its maximum development potential).
The City should set aside a certain portion of its annual
budget to make energy conservation improvements to City
facilities as needed.

-J.58-

r'\

�.

'

\ .

r- .
i

I ••

r ·.
i

! •

IMPLEMENTATION

�DEVELOPMENT PRIORITIES

f '
I

'

'

I _;

Now that the future development plan, including the proposed
land use plan,
has been described, the implementation
of the Plan is facilitated by the establishment of a schedule
for phasing the development program over the life of the
Plan.
Such a schedule should be based on the most immediate
needs and demands of the City, a realistic assessment of the
capacity of each phase of the program to be implemented
(usually cost is the major factor) and the overall impact of
the program on the quality of life in the City.
The phasing program for the City of Eaton Rapids Comprehensive Plan is established according to 'development areas'.
The programs are scheduled to be completed in five year
increments over the 20 year life of this Plan.
That is,
Phase I improvement areas are scheduled for development
within the first five years, Phase II areas are to be
improved during years 6 through 10, Phase III areas during
the 11th through 15th year and Phase IV from years 16 through
20.
These development areas and projects are identified in
the following table and depicted on Map 19.
These priorities are intended as general guidelines for the
City in establishing scheduling of projects and undertaking
detailed analysis and evaluation of those projects.
The
City's Capital Improvement Plan and Program should follow
this sequence of phasing for area development.
The Planning
and Zoning Commission should undertake more specific projects
that define the recommendations in this Plan in greater
detail and in accordance with this schedule.
In effect, this
schedule is an important component of the implementation
efforts associated with this Plan and should be referred to
as a guide for further detailed planning and programming.

l .. ,

-159-

�TABIE 34

SCHEDULED PHASES OF DEVEWPMENT

Developnent Area
( 1)

M::&gt;bile Hone Park
Hyatt Street

Infrastructure or Public
Irrprovenents Needed

Phase

Public Inprovenent Planni~

Phase I

(2) MUltiple-Family/Office None - City Utilities in Place Private Inprovenents Necessary
Brook/Dexter

Phase I

(3) Cormercial Errphasis
S. ?-Bin

Phase I

( 4)

DOA Ri verwalk

None - City Utilities in Place Private Inprovenents
Public Irrprovenents Needed
and Land Acquisition
North
South

(5) Cornnunity Developnent

&amp;
&amp;

W=st Section
East Section

Phase I
Phase II

Possible Expansion of City
Utilities - Private Developnent

Phase II

None - Utilities in Place
Private Irrprovenents

Phase II

Michigan Avenue
( 7)

Recreation Area
S.W. City Limits

Public Irrprovenents Needed
Sone Land Acquisition

Phase III

( 8)

Recreation Area
N.E. City Limits

Public Inprovenents Needed
City Owns Property

Phase III

( 9)

Recreation Area
water Street

Public Irrprovenents Needed
Land Acquisition

Phase

IV

Needs Expanded Utilities

Phase

IV

Needs Expanded Utilities

Phase

IV

Horner Property
(6) MUltiple-Family

(10) P.U.D.

Northeast City Limits
( ll)

P.U.D.
N.W. City Limits

OCOURCE:

EATON RAPIDS PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION

-160-

�•

CJ

C

f l)

a,

.....

fl)

w

E
a:

·-

a:

fl)
fl)

w

~
a,

~

CJ

0

Q

.,..

0,

1□

r.

·0

'[~ ' .. f _,ii:=:~G~--,,§

::::==;:;:;~:?
.

,OXIAfO

"

~

l

¥

% □=D"'rJIL
- . ·[JLI ,

--__. ..-...;,_~- - . ; ; ~ ~ ~ '

..,,,

~

Uft ·
]Oo l

&gt;

·W

C

~
i ·

, . . . . . ..

•

:

//
1/

j

g

.

LU

;

.' • .ffl ' •'i •

□□Li~~D
UJ•

-

LU

a:

a.
:E

0

I

z

1000 00 000000000 •
00000

0 0 00

0000~ o....o.....o0o0o0o0o~o,,_~o..
. ---t--

~

&lt;1&gt;

LU

J:

a:

t) O OO OO OOOOOOOOC

000 0 0000000000 ,

_

-"'

&lt;(

10 00 00 000000000

00 0 0.0 0 00000000

---~-

LU

&gt;
z

"'-aC.

-

ooo o ~ooooooc
000000 •
oooooooo c

·

C

u

t&gt; ooo o ooooooooo c

0 00 00 000000000 ,

&gt;
LU

'I)
tff
1

~

t

I

00

I

000000000000 0 0 0 0 0

000000000000000

09P090090Q.£&gt;~O~o~o~o~o= ....-,:t:!,.~

@) I

:E
a.

l':'"J~ '. ; ~6~

· E'j ·••.

q-

I .....

f.
~
- -- -·-.:.
-:=::=
.::--,-=-=+---~ ,.,_'~"-:.;.:=
..======c=-.-:=
..,,.n,
0

w

a.

;; ·::- . . DD@ □□□ ~CJgi .. .,.~q □
-··· 11~_~ ·. ·.
□p1 ~DE!r1o~D§J

1...-...,,.=-·- . . .
·-·
.{?~: : ..

C,

..J

zLU

~
C_j

:&gt;

0

0

1-

l

...z

:e :e
0.

z
&lt;
.J

&amp; '--=:,

~)II

CJDOI ' '"" 100
□ D
. . ,.

~

0.
c(

0.

- . _ _ _1·

!

0

~

LU

._

I

-161-

�Implementation Schedule
-.
I

•

I .'

I.'

The following Implementation Schedule relates recommended
programs
to
participants,
project phasing
and
funding
sources. The programs are in conformance with the suggestions
and recommendations identified in the various sections of
this Study, while the action associated with each program is
a more specific performance or exercise intended to carry out
that program.
The participants that are responsible for
undertaking each action are identified.
In those instances
where more than one participant is involved, coordination is
necessary.
The time or phasing of each action is stipulated
in years.
Funding sources are identified for each action as
primary or secondary.
Primary sources are those that should
supply the majority of the financing for a particular action.
Secondary funds are intended to supplement the primary revenue sources.
Special assessments refer to either a tax
assessment levied against specified properties by the City
for a particular public improvement or by the Downtown
Development Authority or
the Local Development Finance
Authority sponsored activities.
Contributions refer to personal or group voluntary contributions as well as fees and dues, etc., levied against
merchants or groups.
The list of funding sources is by no
means exhaustive and should be added to and updated as new
sources are found and existing financial programs change.
This chart is to be used as a general guide and its utility
lies in its ability to unify and coordinate the various
recommendations associated with this Plan.

-162-

�PARTICIPANIS

TIMIN:;

FWOm:;SCXJiCB

• P r ~ _O ~~-'~-

TABLE 35

~

11
YEAR-

IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE
I

POLICllS
LAND USE __

. _ .. _ ___ __ _ _

~~

.1Cl'Im
. __ __

Pericafcilly review land use procedures - SAME
C.OOrdina~ land use plan with ne!_g_hbor- - Pr!:5ram ~iodic ueetings bet"Ween
ing- tc,.mships
tD,.mship and city r~resentatives
Prroote areas suitable for different
- Contact developers
~ of develcpient

Iii I I I ~±I tt t1~tl
b.Ji!,lil

I I I I . . . . . ., I •

RESIDENTIAL

I
r-'
O'I

w
I

Create a CcmnunityDevelo;rrent _~iporati'Oll
Study ]pisibility of est.ablishlng a
I public private _partnership to develop
multi-family projects
Prcm:,te naintenance of quality older
hcrres
PrCJTOte deTOiiHon of seve:-ely
dilapidated housing units

- Solicit local interest in fanning
neighborhocd or areawide CDC's
- Stud:t: housinq needs in the ci tyz
cxmtact_private developers

l&amp;I I I I I I I__L~ I I I I Ill

~ 11 ~ I ~LLLL~m

- O:rnnunit
1t en for well
uaintain 0 er
- Use powers of condemnation (cnly
as last resort)

I I -

COMMERCIAL

Prarote develqxrent of the CBO

Develop incentives for rehabTI1tat1cn
an..!.£reservation of do.mt.a..n

- Establish a TIF plan and r29ram ·
- Purchase and rehabilitate:reircdel
deteriorated prc:perties and sell
at l0w narket rate
- Prem:&gt;
1 events
- Form
tee to solicit
ures

~~

11

ru.

t

- Acqw

pr

111111

Ir

the city

.
Research and establish tax incre:rent
financing ~ram

I ■

-·
~

sewer an water sys
t etc.
- St~:t:.advantages~disadvantages - i f ~ ]
p:,s1tive, establish a Iocal Devel-

· · · · · ~ HI

I I I I I I ..i

~ ~~r:s~rll~::=urage I I I I I I 11

I I I I laa

I I I I 1· 1 FT~•

finance _p_rCQram

)

)

)

�J

:-····•- .

)

1/

""""'
PARTICIPrwu,3

-~

Prarote industrial develocrrent
Prarote local e,oloVITEnt

O'I
~

I
c,,:,t.tc,,:,

n,:,

-

'•~

··

OPEN SPACE. PARKS AND RECREATION
Rehabilitate ~ snace

TRANSPORTATION
Tnnrove transnortation facilities

'
T1

..

~nhl ~ ~ -

health and safl"tv

I

I

.~~ ![
li~!ili ~ E~
:1 ~ l
.

IJ 1i

lllii

Iii

t

.

.

~ ~ ,,

~

!

p!
II
►.

r~

1
.

~~

~
;

IE
~

t

,

:

e

• [

~

• ljj

l
.A

i

t
i

~· ·~

~

f,

i· !

~

.

5

!

~

-

-

11

•

■

■

■

•

.;,·

Create sense of carmunitv

COMM!JNITY HEH ,TH

•I

•

I~

" It

11111,1

·,
- Identify types of industries that
are JJOSt conducive to the ~il!l.l
characteristics of the ci tv1
identitv effects of those industrie!
· en the citv (envlron.rrental. ec:oncrn.i C • social)
·· - Cbntact or----:'"~ve industries
I.&amp;
- Prcrrote aqreenents to aive hlrina
oreferences to local residents, ·
innroverent of trainina oroarans

I

I

~,

c~~

I

I

~ ~ ~ -~ .

1I CJ ,.·
~

FI.NDDGrrSCXlRCB.
Pdlll'lr,

t

~~

!!

i . I ~ ~~El;::;;tu
6 I~ ~ ~ · ~
l
E ; I~ s t
~
~I" ~I~
M ~

1--'

•

111

1~

ii i,;
I~

~~

ACTIClf

'l'IMOG

~

~

1•

INDUSTRIAL
Prarote industrial develo;:rrent in the
citv
-..

)

'. j

'

a11m

- Prcrrote creaticn of citizen c:i::m-mi ttees or CDCs for neiahborhood
rehabilitation. olannina. etc.J
encouraqe orivate and public
nartnershios in addressina loca.J.
social service needs.
- Construct narks and recreational
facilities: create incentives for
the onvate sector to develoo
recreation facilities

:i

.A
_..

llli

IJ

,a

~-

•

_.
l.t

- Irrole-nent oroqrams to inorove
I_.
na;or and local streets1 increase
number of narkina facilities
around i::cmrercial areas:
desian and construct bikeoath
_..
'-"Stem, strioe bikelane d..long side
of roadwav

&amp;

.t

~ ... ~
~ _ _

•

,_ -

;

.._ ... .._

I

~

...

~

111111

•

cc

• •

,....

,..

-

la

■

&lt;:aJ:&gt;l"'l'V
_,:

Maintain an uroated citv clfc,,.e+•o~
resnonse rilan
- Maintain educational
()n
health and safety

A

~

•

•

•

a

J

�CONCLUSION

�r .
I
I

APPENDICES
.

'I

APPENDIX A - PROCEDURE FOR LAND USE SURVEY

•

I -

APPENDIX B - COMMUNITY OPINION SURVEY

,·

I'
ir

l •

l

I

t ..

•

APPENDIX C - SURVEY RESULTS

�,·-

l
.....i ....

r.
·'
t

L

APPENDIX A

•

PROCEDURE FOR LAND USE SURVEY

,.
f

'l

.

\_

L
,.

5

i

•

I.
I

'
L.

I

�I

•

I

,..,..

PROCEDURE FOR CONDUCTING A LAND USE SURVEY FOR
CITY OF EATON RAPIDS
Purpose:

In order to develop a community plan, or to establish and retain a
current inventory of activities within the community, it is
necessary to conduct a land use survey. This survey can be used as
a tool for analyzing problems and potentials associated with individual parcels and the spatial relationship between parcels as well as
between whole sectors of the City. Patterns of past, present and
future development can be determined and assessed, and a comprehensive overview of the activities occurring within the corranunity at
any one point in time can be attained.

General Approach: To conduct a land use survey efficiently, the planning
area should be divided into sectors and each surveyor (or team of
two or more surveyors) is assigned a particular sector or sectors.
Each individual or team should cover their assigned sector(s) over a
specified period of time (say 1 or 2 weeks). Each person (team)
will be given a map of his/her assigned sector(s), along with
instructions for identifying and recording land uses. Either a
windshield survey (by car) or a walking survey is acceptable. If
vehicles are used, at least two people per vehicle is desirable one to drive and one to record on the map. The map should be
attached to a clipboard for stability.

r --

L

Equipment: A base map of the City, containing the road system and,
if possible, lot splits; clipboard or other hard surface, several
pencils, erasures.
Procedures: Beginning at one of the corners of the assigned sector, drive or
walk through the area in a predetermined pattern that will minimize
repetition or "back-tracking". If in a car, drive at a slow enough
speed to allow the person recording to register appropriate information on the map. When recording a structure on the map, the surveyor may often have to estimate as closely as possible the location
of the structure within a particular block or section. Each
recorder will use the following symbols in conducting the survey:

11

0 Single-Family Residence

'iJ

Manufacturing

&lt;D Multiple-Family
(3 or more units per building)

X

Warehouse

□

School (Specify Elementary, Junior High,
High

f&gt;

Public Facility (Specify)

e
''

.

Duplex

0 Mobile Home

□
0

Retail Commercial

□

Office

Church

H Hospital

-166-

�Only the primary structure needs to be recorded. For example, for a parcel
that contains a house and a pole barn, or other accessory building, only the
house needs to be identified on the map. If a commercial building contains,
for example,. a retail store on the first floor, offices on the second floor,
and apartments on the third floor, the following symbol would apply:

§
That is, where a structure can be identified as housing more than one activity, record the primary activity that's occurring on the 1st floor, the primary activity on the second floor, etc., using the appropriate combination of
symbols, as in the example above.
Identify the number of stories in a building with a small subscript (1,2,3,4,
etc.) outside the symbol on the lower left. Identify the condition of the
structure with either an A, 8, or Con the lower right, outside of the symbol.
"A" indicates the structure appears to be in good condition, with little or no
repair/fix-up needed; "8" indicates the structure is somewhat deteriorated and
needs minor-to-moderate repair; "C" indicates the structure is dilapidated and
needs major repair or is beyond repair. This is a subjective evaluation, so
everyone conducting the survey should agree as to what constitutes minor and
major repair.
Combining these symbols will result in a process that identifies the type of
dwelling, the number of stories, and its general structural condition.

(D
For example, a symbol such as~ 6 depicts a multiple-family residence that
contains 3-stories and is somewhat deteriorated. Even in the instance of a
multiple story structure that has different uses on each floor (such as the
retail/office/apartment building depicted above) the total number of floors
should be noted in subscript. This helps to identify vacancies.

0

□

For example the symbol 4DA depicts a 4-story building in good condition that
contains three different uses on 3 floors, with no use (or vacancy) on a 4th
fl oar.
If a primary building is vacant, the symbol representing that structure should
be lightly shaded in. This obviously does not need to be done in the example
cited immediately above.
In cases where a particular land use, such as a golf course, airport, park or
other similar type of activity covers a large area, the land use can be written down without using a symbol. Also, if the surveyor believes a particular
structure or site has any significant historical or cultural value, he or she
should reference that in a brief notation on a separate note pad, with
reference to a letter o~ number that would identify the site on the ma~.
Once all the participants have completed their surveys, they will be combined
into one composite map by the consultant and presented to the Planning
Commission as a body for review and corrections as necessary .

._167-

�,-

)

I

-r,
[

APPENDIX 8
COMMUNITY OPINION SURVEY

r
l

•

I

L
I
:

I.

' .

\

L

�CITY OF EATON RAPIDS
COMMUNITY OPINION SURVEY
(Total Surveys 375)
1. To what age group do you belong?

L:
2.

r·

i

(1)

21

18-25

(2)

(4)

~

46-55

(5) _£__ 56-64

_lLless than 1 yr.

(1)

f •

(4) .2!_11-20 years

' .

I

:.

1. ·_.

·,

26-35

(3)

87 36-45

(6) 103 65 and older

How long have you been a resident of the City?

\

I

74

(2) _g_l-3 years

(3) ~4-10 years

(5) 177 over 20 years
( 2)

rent

Do you own your home or are you renting?

4.

How many individuals in the following age groups reside in your household?
110 0-5

(1)

(5) 272 . 36-54
5.

6.

(2) 199 6-18

(3)

(6)

(7)

79 55-64

(1) 293 own

77

3.

66 19-25

nL

(4) 142 26-35

65 and older

In what type of housing are you living now?
(1) 306 single-family House

(2) __!_!_ duplex

(3)

(4)

~

apartment/townhouse

5 mobile Home

No Answer 4

Please indicate the appropriate range of your household income before taxes
last year.
(1)

~

less than $10,000

(2) Z!._ $10-$20,000

(3) .§!_ $20-$30,000

l

i -

(4) _2! $30-$40,000
7.

~

$40-$50,000

(6) 42 over $50,000
u No answer

(2) ..11._ part-time

What are the occupations of employed members of your household?
Manager-IO; Prof. Specialty-9; Technician-8; Sales-3;
Clerical-17; Protective Services-I; Services-I;
Precision Production, Craft, Repair-2; Machine
(1)
full-time (identify) Operators-14; Transportation-4; Handlers, Laborers-IO;
(2)

9.

~

How many employed people are in your household?
(1) 384 full-time

8.

(5)

part-time

Manager-1; Prof. Specialty-3; Sales-4; Clerical-2;
(identify) HH Services-2; Services-6; Handlers, Cleaners, Laborers-

In what City do the employed members of your household work?
(1)

full-time

Eaton Rapids-88

Lansing-131

Other-67

(2)

part-time

Eaton Rapids-45

Lansing-22

Other-19

-1-168-

�10.

How many people in your household have:
(1) 409
(3)

completed high school only

85 have a college degree

(1) 119 retired

(2) 180 have 1 to 3 years of college
(4)

53 have completed more than 4
- - years of college

(2) _l.L planning to retire within the next 5 years

11.

Are you:

12.

How long do you expect to reside at your present residence? - - - - - - - - -

13.

Do you plan to move out of town sometime?

14.

If yes, what type of housing would you be looking for:
(1) 114

single-family Home

(1) 124 yes

(2) 203

no

(2) _7_ duplex

(3) ..1Z_ apartment

(4)

6 mobile home

( 5) other

------------------

15.

16.

Do you believe that most new single-family houses in Eaton Rapids should be:
(1) _7_ approximately less than 800 square feet

(2) 109

(3)

(4) 140 don't know

~

over 1200 square feet in size

800 to 1200 square feet

Which of the following residential types should be promoted in the City of
Eaton Rapids? (Please check all desired types)
(1) 299
(3)

single-family house

(2) 139 multi-family (apartments)

60 mobile homes

(4) 154

(5)

86 modular homes
- - (prefabricated single-family)

(7)

~

condominiums

-2-

duplexes (two-family)

(6) 125 townhouses

�,.,

17. Which of the following residential types should be promoted in Eaton Rapids and
Hamlin Townships? (Please check all desired types}
(1) 297
(3)

(2) 128 multi-family (apartments}

single-family House

(4) 139

79 mobile Homes

(5) 109 modular Homes
- - (prefabricated single-family)

(7)

duplexes (two-family)

(6) 103 townhouses

86 condominiums

I.,

18.

Are there any additional comments you care to make about residential development?
Various comments - not much has devefoped; housing is difficult to find; keep
taxes at a reasonable percent of valuation; the town is not interested in

.
i

growth; take better care of what we have; Inverness and Raeburn Street area needs

(

'

repaving, curb and sidewalk; need owners that take pride in appearance and maintenance of property.
19.

a.

Do you feel there is sufficient commercial development in Eaton Rapids?
(1)

b.
'

l

.l

, ..

( 2) 299

no

If you answered "no", where should commercial development be encouraged?
(3)

.

_§!_ yes

~

downtown area only

(5) 150 along M-99 south of downtown
20.

(4) 199

along M-99 north of downtown

(6)

other sections of the City

45

We would like to have any comments you care to make regarding commercial
facilities or services in Eaton Rapids •
Various comments - encourage all businesses, allow franchises to operate; more
men's or men's/women's apparel stores; medium priced restaurant; greater
variety of shopping; fast food restaurants; need tax incentives to encourage
more downtown commerce in available office space; prices are too high; put
commercial development on Kennyville Road; need fine dining restaurant; there
are no job opportunities - no incentive to stay; supermarket north of CBD specialty stores downtown; because Eaton Rapids is between Jackson and Lansing,
it should grow like Holt.
-3-

,.__

-170-

�21.

How do you feel about industrial development in Eaton Rapids?
(1)

22.

(2)

69

limited development
should be encouraged

(3) 161 major industrial development should
- - be encouraged

(4)

63 should be limited to the
- - City's industrial park

(5) 206

(6)

61 heavy industry should be
- - encouraged

light industry should be encouraged

Should Eaton Rapids attempt to attract:

(Indicate, 1st, 2nd and 3rd choices)

(1)

health oriented service industries
- - 1st 2nd 3rd
74 4I 27

( 3)

( 5)

( 7)

23.

22 there is sufficient amount already

high-tech Industries
- - 1st 2nd 3rd
109" 25" zr

(2)

manufacturing industries
1st 2nd 3rd
86 o(Y --zg-

(4)

agricultural-related
industries
1st 2nd 3rd
7:8 47 """)6"

(6)

a 11 of the above
1st 2nd 3rd
80 7o 7r

(8)

tourists
1st 2nd

7U"

~

3rd
-z7

educational institutions
1st 2nd 3rd

9

30

73

other (describe)
1st 2nd 3rd - - - - - - - --, -3 4

Are there any particular restrictions you would care to place on Industrial
Development in Eaton Rapids, such as location; size, amount and type of
pollutants; aesthetics, etc?
Various comments - no pollution; no chemical companies; should be localized,
not necessarily in industrial park; no noise; no odor; locate outside resid.
areas; no restrictions - needs jobs; ensure attractive building fronts; grounds,
etc.; discourage heavy industry; should enhance the community

24.

Are there any additional comments you care to make about future Industrial
Development?
Various comments - electrical power is sufficient only for small ind~stries;
develop more jobs

-4-

�Should there be any restrictions on Development along the Grand River in the
City:
(1)

(2)

267 yes

61

no

If yes, should development be restricted to:
(1)

90

(3)

~

low density residential

(2) 176

low density commercial

(4) 149 outdoor recreation

(5) other
26.

Should not detract from area; proper mix; proper facilities/restrooms

How far back from the river's edge should such restrictions apply?
(1)
(3)

18 within 25 ft.
~

within 100 ft.

(2)

63 within 50 ft.

(4)

85 within more than 100 ft.
(Specify)

1.

27.

---------------

Should the City strive to develop more public park and recreation opportunities
in Eaton Rapids?
(1)

l ,

scenic open space

215 yes

(2) 101

If yes, where?

no

Old fair grounds, near downtown; along river; corner of Main

and Canal, near hospital; State and Main Streets
What type?

Picnic area/playground, canoeing outdoor ampitheatre; nature

center; nature walks; benches and shade; family type recreation
r

I
\

,,.I

'

28.

With which of the following land uses would you prefer to see Eaton Rapids
develop in the future? (Please check 1st, 2nd and 3rd choices)
1st
120

-sr

manufacturing

79

82

59

(4)

services (offices, etc) 16

recreational

47

46

68

(6)

no new development

(1)

residential

(3)
(5)
29.

3rd
48 (2)

m

2nd 3rd
47 52

1st 2nd 3rd
BIT 94 Lf5"

8

36

49

1

5

1st 2nd 3rd
54 89 36

( 2)

commercial

47

(4)

services (offices,etc) 12

17

39

50

54

(6)

agricultural

15

28

3

8

(1)

residential

( 3)

manufacturing

78

78

( 5)

recreational

38

( 7)

no new development 5

'

·-

;

-5..~.

commercial

With which of the following land uses would you prefer to see Eaton Rapids and
1st

'9

2nd

-172-

19

�·30 ·.

Are you satisfied with the way Eaton Rapids has been growing and developing up
to now?
(2) 213 no
If no, why not? Various comments ( 1) .!!l_ yes
needs a larger tax base; lack of school financial support; little progress
made; businesses come and then leave; lack of variety in stores; no fast food or
teen places; roads in need of repair or expansion; need more office space; fix
up old homes; 20 years behind time; empty storefronts; too many people go else.

where for entertainment and shopping; need to coordinate development
31.

On a scale of 1 to
Eaton Rapids?
1
2
3
(1)

5 how would you rate the following services and facilities in
=
=
=

very good
more than adequate
adequate

4 = less than adequate
5 = very poor

(2) 2.46 library

3.01 housing

(3) 2.54 EATRAN

(4) 2.66 medical services

(5) 2.57 law enforcement

(6) 2.47 emergency rescue unit

(7) 3.65 recreational facilities

(8) 3.17 zoning &amp; building code enforcement
(10) 3.03 sanitary sewer facilities

(9) 2.77 water supply facilities
(11) 2.99 storm sewer facilities

(12) 2.75 public education

(13) 2.47 school facilities

(14) 2.57 fire protection

(15) 3.92 streets

(16) 3.31 curb &amp;gutter

(17) 3.49 sidewalks

(18) 3.13 public buildings (specify)

(19) 3.85 City Government
- - communication with the
public

(20) 3.84 City Government responsiveness to
- - public needs/problems

(21) 3.33 attempts at building
- - community pride

(22) 3.12 historic preservation

(23) 2.86 community beautification

(24) 2.61 community involvement by nonprofit
- - organizations and service clubs

(25) 2.56 trash and garbage service (26) 3.11 street cleaning
(27) 2.72 snow removal

(28) 2.72 electric facilities

(29) 2.32 cemetery maintenance

(30) 4.29 other (identify) businesss community I";"
support; planning for future; new store
fronts, City management; tourist and
industrial promotion; senior facilities
-6-°173-

I

�..,
32.- From the items in question 31, which three items do you believe are most
important?
1st 2nd 3rd
(1)
34 26
Law enforcement

«

1st

33.
I ,
I -

2nd 3rd
79 u

(2)

«

(3)

1st 2nd 3rd
29 24 u

Streets
City Government Comm.

What type of recreational activities (public
developed or improved?
( 1)

49

(2) 105

bowling

(4) 223

bicycle/walking/jogging paths

baseball/softball/football

( 6)

soccer

teen center

(8) 198 movie theatre

golf

(3) 138 canoeing
(5)

~

(7) 210
( 9)
(11)

33 tennis
~

&amp; private) would you like to see

32

(10) ..11_ racquetball

other-hunting and fishing; basketball; boating; swimming; shuffleboard;
roller skating; outdoor concert; comedy club; ice rink; mini-golf;
cross-country skiing; health spa

..

I

'

34.

What type of public and private cultural activities would you like to see
developed?

'

f

(1) .!.l!:!_ performing arts theatre

(2) _29__ art gallery

( 3) 137 museum

(4)

19

other (identify) sports area; home

tours; dinner theatre; teen activities
35.

Is Eaton Rapids a place you would like to live on a long-term basis?
(1) 300 yes
Why?

(2)

39

no

Various comments - (yes answers) - nice people; close to Lansing;

quiet; small town; potential for great schools; born here; safe, low crime
rate; pretty setting;
(no answers) - needs to grow with the times; offers nothing; City is stagnating

-7-174-

�36.

Is Eaton Rapids effective in solving its problems?
If no, how could it be more effective?

(1)

107 yes

(2) 176 no

Various comments - needs more effective

leadership; needs to convnunicate with the public; should be more aggressive
in solving problems; need public input into problem solving; need new City
Council members; residents should vote on major issues; needs newspaper; should
be more responsive to voters

37.

Would you like more input to the City's decision-making process?
(1)

J2§__ yes

(2) 100 no

If yes, by what means?

Various comments - keep people informed; have open.

forum, conduct surveys for large expenditures, through commercial, service and
manufacturing leaders; newspapers; flashes

38.

How can Eaton Rapids better serve its residents?
Various comments - have its own newpaper; provide more recreation and
cultural activities; improve the school system; provide apartments/duplexes;
improve in-town businesses; reduce property taxes; keep the public informed;
activities for young people; fast-food restaurants; take this survey seriously;
be more helpful to new businesses; stimulate business growth; build on
uniqueness of small town; river.

-8-

-175-

�EATON RAPIDS TOWNSHIP
COMMUNITY OPINION SURVEY
Total Surveys 102
1.

To what age group do you belong?

;':

(1)

2 18-25

(2)

21

26-35

(3) _1L 36-45

.- ,

(4)

20 46-55

(5)

19

56-64

(6)

10 65 and ·older

1

No Answer

I

2.
, .-

How long have you been a resident of Eaton Rapids Township?
1 less than 1 yr.

(1)

(2) _9_1-3 years

(4) -.£Z_ll-20 years
I

(3) ..J.L4-10 years

(5) ~over 20 years

3.

Do you own your home or are you renting? (1)

own (2)

4.

How many individuals in the following age groups reside in your household?

~

2

rent

1 No Answer

i .., _

5.

·-~

;~

(1) ~0-5

(2) 71

6-18

(3) 16

(5) ~36-54

(6) 33

55-64

(7) 21

(4) 39

26-35

65 and older

In what type of housing are you living now?
(1)

6.

19-25

~

single-family House

(2)

0

duplex

(3) _0_ apartment/townhouse

(4)

3

mobile Home

1 No Answer

Please indicate the appropriate range of your household income before taxes
last year.
(1) _6_ less than $10,000
(4) .!!_ $30-$40,000

(5)

(2) 1§._ $10-$20,000
~

$40-$50,000

(6)

(3) 1§._ $20-$30,000
~

over $50,000

7.

How many employed people are in your household?

(1) 115 full-time

8.

What are the occupations of employed members of your household?

16 No Answer
(2) ~part-time

Sales-2; Clerical-?; Protective Services-I; Mgmt-11;
Farmer-2; Prof. Specialty-IO; Technician-14; Precision
Production, Craft-4; General Services-4; Machine
(1) _jJ__ full-time (identify) Operators-9; Transportation-4; Handlers-2
(2)
9.

~

part-time (identify) Technician-1; Sales-5, Prof. Specialty-I; Clerical-6;
Services-?; Machine Operator-I

In what City do the employed members of your household work?
(1)

f u11 - ti me _ _L_a_n_s,_·n_g~-_4_8___E_a_t_o_n_R_a__p_i_d_s_-1_7___0_t_h_er_-_1_9_

( 2)

part-ti me _ _E_a_t_on_R_a.._p_id_s_-_1_4_ _L_a_ns_,_·n....g__-_7___0t_h_e_r_-_7_ _
-1-176-

�10~

How many people in your household have:
(1) 130 completed high school only

(2)

~

(3)

(4)

10 have completed more than 4
- - years of college

22

have a college degree
(1)

11.

Are you:

12.

How long do you expect to reside at your present residence?
0-2 Yrs

13.

3

retired (2)
answer

3-5 Yrs

5

19

6-10 Yrs

planning to retire within the next 5 years

10 11-20 Yrs

48

20+ Yrs

3

No Ans

33

Do you plan to move into Eaton Rapids sometime?
(1) _8_ yes
Why?

14.

22

-rr- no

r

have 1 to 3 years of college

(2)

89

no

No Answer 5

--------------------------------

If yes, what type of housing would you be looking for:
(1)

single-family Home

~

(3) _3_ apartment

(2)

2

duplex

(4)

0

mobile home

(5) other

87
------------------

15.

Do you believe that most new single-family houses in Eaton Rapids Township
should be:
(1) _5_approximately less than 800 square feet
(3) ~over 1200 square feet in size

16.

(4) 27

(2) 35 800 to 1200 square feet
don't know

No Answer

7

Which of the following residential types should be promoted in the City of
Eaton Rapids? (Please check all desired types)
(1) _JJ__ single-family house

(2)

(3)

(4) ___li_ duplexes (two-family)

(5)
(7)

12 mobile homes
23 modular homes
- - (prefabricated single-family)
22

condominiums

-2-177-

46 multi-family (apartments)

(6) ..ll.__ townhouses

�17.

Which of the following residential types should be promoted in Eaton Rapids
Township? (Please check all desired types)
(1)

87 single-family House

(3)

26

....J

(5)

(7)
18.

mobile Homes

33 modular Homes
- - (prefabricated single-family)

(2)

22

multi-family (apartments)

(4)

35

duplexes (two-family)

(6)

18 townhouses

15 condominiums

Are there any additional comments you care to make about residential development?
Various comments - do not allow houses to deteriorate; have landlords clean up
homes and businesses on M-99 N; large apartments, townhouses not needed; can
build on any size lot; housing or trunklines may be destroying possible

'.

business and industrial locations; more independent housing for elderly;
develop in southern part of Eaton Rapids •

...

•

19.

a.

Do you feel there is sufficient commercial development in Eaton Rapids?
(1)

b.

_1L yes

( 2)

84

no

No Answer

3

If you answered "no", where should commercial development be encouraged?
(3)

24

downtown area only

(4)

(5)

41

along M-99 south of downtown

(6)

57

along M-99 north of downtown

16 other sections of the City
Wriere?

-----------

20.
!

.

We would like to have any comments you care to make regarding commercial
facilities or services in Eaton Rapids.
Various comments - need family type restraints; discount store; theatre; fix
up store fronts and develop theme; needs: shopping center, community radio
station, high quality dining, fast food restaurants, department store, men 1 s
store, shoe stores, newspaper; do not develop any more than is; has been no
major effort to expand development; need more competition; need large bowling
alley; City is pushing commercial businesses outside of town by not working
with them

-3-

-178-

�30~

Are you satisfied with the way Eaton Rapids has been growing and developing up
to now?
(2) 55 no
No Answer 12
If no, why not?
(1) 2L yes
--No vision; bad streets; growth too tightly controlled; need more employment; too
much inferior housing, not enough commercial development; no "new" money; businesses come and go; not enough services, growing too slow; businesses fold
because of lack of support from people; no places for recreation and entertainment; no place for teens.

31.

On a scale of 1 to 5 how would you rate the following services and facilities in
Eaton Rapids?
1 = very good
4 = less than adequate
2 = more than adequate 5 = very poor
3 = adequate
Average
Average
(1) 2.94 housing
(2) 2.49 library
(3) 2.60 EATRAN

(4) 2.96 medical services

(5) 2.90 law enforcement

(6) 2.60 emergency rescue unit

(7) 3.71 recreational facilities

(8) 2.99 zoning &amp; building code enforcement

(9) 2.73 water supply facilities

(10) 3.00 sanitary sewer facilities

(11) 3.04 storm sewer facilities

(12) 2.84 public education

(13) 2.56 school facilities

(14) 2.79 fire protection

(15) 3.54 streets

(16) 3.05 curb &amp;gutter

(17) 3.09 sidewalks

(18) 3.24 public buildings (specify) _ _ __

(19) 3.87 City Government
- - communication with the
public

(20) 3.83 City Government responsiveness to
- - public needs/problems

(21) 3.26 attempts at building
- - community pride

(22) 3.12 historic preservation

(23) 2.72 community beautification

(24)

2.71 community involvement by nonprofit
- - organizations and servi~e clubs

(25) 2.78 trash and garbage service (26) 2.92 street cleaning
(27) 2.76 snow removal

(28) 2.85 electric facilities

(29) 2.46 cemetery maintenance

(30) 4.57 other (identify) teen center;
restaurants; education
. -6-

-181-

----

�\.

,'

32.· From the items in question 31, which three items do you believe are most
important?
Law Enforcement-16; School Facilities-11; Housing-9; City Govt. Commission-8;
(1) Public Education-a

f. .

School Facilities-14; Medical Services-13; Fire P:rotection-10;
(2) Law Enforcement-10
(3) Law Enforcement-16; Medical Services-12
33.
! •

What type of recreational activities (public
developed or improved?
(1)

_9_ golf

(3)

~

(2)

22

bowling

(4) _.2§___ bicycle/walking/jogging paths

canoeing

•

....

(5) ...1i._ baseball/softball/football

l'.•.·

(7)

53 teen center

(9)

14 tennis

(11)

12 other

1

&amp; private) would you l i ke to see

( 6)
(8)

6 soccer
50 movie theatre

i

(10) _6_ racquetball
all; cross-country skiing; swimming; mini-golf; areas for girl
scouts

What type of public and private cultural activities would you like to see
developed?
(1) -1!_ performing arts theatre

(2) ...1i._ art gallery

( 3)

(4)

32 museum

9 other (identify) all; high school
band; camping; teen center

35.

t

Is Eaton Rapids Township a place you would like to live on a long-term basis?
(1)
Why?

~

yes

(2)

10

no

No Answer

6

Friendly people; enjoy country living; away from City; quiee, grew up

here; lived here all my life; little or no commercial development; good roads;
good place to raise family; good school district; no - getting too populated;
not if it keeps deteriorating

-7-182-

�'

36~

Is Eaton Rapids effective in solving its problems?
No Answer

(1)

~

yes

(2)

52

no

25

If no, how could it be more effective?

City and Townships, must work together;

resolve fire department situation to benefit of taxpayers; more open forums for
people to express views; better communication; better convnunity involvement;
expecting better government in charge in City Council

37.

Would you like more input to the City's decision-making process?
(1)

....!§_ yes

(2)

23

If yes, by what means?

no

No Answer 33

inform public; more public involvement; City and

Townships should work together, newspapere; opinion pools, questionnaires
and surveys

38.

•--

How can Eaton Rapids better serve the area?
Encourage new businesses and industry to locate in area; more recreation; better
restraints; improved schools, listen to public; be cooperative and open to
new ideas; install pride back into community; provide more jobs and entertainment; community preservation and beautification; townships and City should work
together; police should serve surrounding area - Sheriff takes too l~o_n=g_t_o___
respond

-8-

-183-

I

�HAMLIN TOWNSHIP
COMMUNITY OPINION SURVEY
Total Surveys 81
l ,
I

1. To what age group do you belong?

-

2.

..

f

2 18-25

( 2)

(4)

23 46-55

(5)

8 26-35
11

( 3) _g_,Q_ 36-45

56-64

(6)

16 65 and older

How long have you been a resident of Hamlin Township?
(1)

_2_1ess than 1 yr.

( 2) _7_1-3 years

( 3) .!§__4-10 years

(5) ~over 20 years

(4) ~11-20 years

'I

l ·~•

(1)

own

1 rent

Do you own your home or are you rent.i ng?

4.

How many individuals in the following age groups reside in your household?

(1)

79

( 2)

3.

~ ~

(1)

.!.L_0-5

( 5) ~36-54
1·
1

5.

r~
~
6.

7.

,

'

(3) 19

( 6) ~55-64

( 7)

19-25

~

(4) ~26-35

65 and older

(1) _2L single-family House

(2)

(3) _0_ apartment/townhouse

(4) _O_ mobile Home

1

duplex

Please indicate the appropriate range of your household income before taxes last year.
(1) _5_ less than $10,000

(2) .!Z_ $10-$20,000

(3) _6_ $20-$30,000

(4) ..!.!_ $30-$40,000

(5) .!§__ $40-$50,000

(6) 12

over $50,000

How many employed people are in your household?
85 full-time

(2) _JJ_ part-time

What are the occupations of employed members of your household?
Management-6; Prof. Specialty-13; Technician-6; Sales-2;
Clerical-9; Services-2; Farming, Forestry-2; Precision
full-time (identify) Production, Craft, Repair-5; Machine Operators-13;
Transportation-2

(1)

Prof. Specialty-4; Technician-4; Clerical-5; Household
part-time (identify) Services-2; Services-4; Machine Operators-1; Transportation-1; Laborer-1

(2)
9.

6-18

In what type of housing are you living now?

(1)
8.

(2) 38

In what City do the employed members of your household work?
(1)

full-time

Eaton Rapids-20

Lansing-31

Other-12

(2)

part-time

Eaton Rapids-15

Lansing-1

Other-5

-1-

-184-

�10.

How many people in your household have:
(1)
(3)

completed high school only

~

17 have a college degree

11. Are you:
12.

(1)

~

retired

(2)

(4)

40

have 1 to 3 years of college

20 have completed more than 4
- - years of college

12 planning to retire within the next 5 years

How long do you expect to reside at your present residence?
0-2 Yrs

13.

(2)

0

3-5 Yrs 4

6-10 Yrs

7

11-20 Yrs

Do you plan to move into Eaton Rapids sometime?

32
( 1)

20+ Yrs

3

yes

(2)

No. Ans

35

no

Why?

14.

If yes, what type of housing would you be looking for:
(1) _6_ single-family Home

(2) _2_ duplex

(3) _4_ apartment

(4)

0 mobile home

(5) other

69
------------------

15.

16.

Do you believe that most new single-family houses in Hamlin Township
should be:
(1) _l_approximately less than 800 square feet

(2) 19 800 to 1200 square feet

(3) ~over 1200 square feet in size

(4) 30

don't know

Which of the following residential types should be promoted in the City of
Eaton Rapids? (Please check all desired types)
(1)
(3)
(5)
(7)

~

single-family house

(2)

16 mobile homes

41

multi-family (apartments)

(4) ..1!_ duplexes (two-family)

23 modular homes
- - (prefabricated single-family)
18 condominiums

-2-185-

(6)

22

townhouses

�c. ..-;

•

.

~

17 • Which of the following residential types should be promoted in Hamlin Township?
(Please check all desired types)

t.

~·

18.

(2)

18 multi-family (apartments)

mobile Homes

(4)

23

(6)

13 townhouses

~

( 3)

21

( 5)

27 modular Homes
(prefabricated single-family)

( 7)

14

r-

i.

single-family House

(1)

duplexes (two-family)

condominiums

Are there any additional comments you care to make about residential development?
Various comments - need for lower income housing; existing M.H. Park is ghetto;

r

leave it up to the individual; in Hamlin Township - too many houses on small

I..

lots; Townships are growing - what CBD doing to accommodate that growth?; place

t

restriction on house size, lot size, house placement, compatability with other

r

houses

L

[ij

19.

a.

Do you feel there is sufficient commercial development in Eaton Rapids?
(1)

\'.

b.

[

_8_ yes

If you answered

(2)
11

70

no

no 11 , where should commercial development be encouraged?

(3) ....ll_ downtown area only

(4) _iL along M-99 north of downtown

(5) _l]__ along M-99 south of downtown

(6)

r.

1

20.

19 other sections of the City
Where?

We would like to have any comments you care to make regarding commercial
facilities or services in Eaton Rapids.
Various comments - need anolther major grocery store; not enough commerical;

,.
\

re-do downtown; nice craft shops; clean-up old IGA parking lot; need to go to

I

•

Lansing to buy specialty items; Eaton Rapids has discouraged business expansion;

l

need: family dining, fast-food restaurants; movie theatre

-3-186-

�36.

Is Eaton Rapids effective in solving its problems?
If no, how could it be more effective?

(1)

~

yes

(2)

48

no

Various comments - be more cooperative

with the townships; get rid of police department and dope pushers; quit driving

out what business you have; more public voice in government; more communication;
work toward the common goal

37.

Would you like more input to the City's decision-making process?
(1)

__R_yes

(2)

26 no

If yes, by what means?

Various comments - open meetings; citizens

advisory board; work through township officials

38.

How can Eaton Rapids better serve its residents?
Various comments - Take power from manager and give to Council; beautification;
bypass around Main Street; let people have a voice; eliminate police harrassment; check for drug pushers in Eaton Rapids schools; allow more business
competition; upgrade the school system; provide more housing; make City
officials responsible for their actions; encourage well-known, established
commercial businesses/franchises for long-term growth; encourage cooperation
between city and townships; build up the town, have more activities; give
people the freedom to do what they want

-8-

-191-

�I

I
i )

APPENDIX C
SURVEY RESULTS

I&lt;

'
'• ,.

I

�EATON RAPIDS SURVEY RESULTS
,' ..

i

i '

,

.

Distribution and Return Rate - The total 1987 population of the Planning
Area (Eaton Rapids, Eaton Rapids Township, Hamlin Township) is 10,107. The
City distributed 1,640 questionnaire surveys. Using an average areawide
household density of about 3.0 persons, approximately 4,900 persons, or
almost 50 percent of the area's population, was covered in the questionnaire mailing. Of the 1,640 questionnaires that were distributed, 285
(17.4%) were mailed to Eaton Rapids Township residents, 297 (18.1%) were
sent to Hamlin Townshp residents and the balance, 1,058 (64.5%) were sent
to the City of Eaton Rapids households.
The overall return rate was relatively high, with 558 (34%) questionnaires
being completely or partially filed in and returned. Of the 558 returns,
102 were from Eaton Rapids Township (a 35.8% return rate for that
Township), 81 were from Hamlin Township (a 27.3% return rate) and 375 were
returned from City residents (a return rate of 35.4%). The 558 returns
result in a confidence level for areawide results of 99 percent.!. 5 percent.

Tabulation Results - The following is a synopsis of the tabulation results
for the entire area and each of the jurisdictions.
Question 1 - Age Groups of Respondents:
Areawide - The largest single age group among respondents was the
36-45 year group (24.5%), followed by those 65 and over (23.1%).
City - Senior (65 and older) were the largest single group of
respondents (27.5% of the total), followed by the 36-45 group
(23.2%)
Eaton Rapids Township - The 36-45 age group (28.4%) made up the
single largest category, followed by the 26-35 year age group at
20.5 percent.
Hamlin Township - The 46-55 year age group comprised 28.4 percent
of all respondents, followed by the 36-45 year age group at 24.7
percent.
Question 2 - Years as Resident:
Areawide - By far the largest category of respondents have lived
1n the area for 20 or more years (44.5%), followed by those living
here between 11 and 20 years (20.2%). Only five percent have
lived here less than one year.
City - 47.2 percent of all City respondents have lived in the City
20 or more years, followed those who have lived here between four
and 10 years (16.5%) and 11 and 20 years (15.5%).

-192-

�Eaton Rapids Township - 42.2% of all Township respondents have
lived in the Township over 20 years, while 26.5 percent have lived
there from 11 to 20 years and 21.6 percent between four and 10
years.
Hamlin Township - 35.8 percent of all respondents have resided in
the Township over 20 years, with one-third (33.3%) having lived
there 11 to 20 years.
Question 3 - Own or Renting:
Areawide - 84.4 percent own, while 14.3 percent rent.
City - 78.1 percent own, while 20.5 percent rent.
Eaton Rapids Township - 97.1 percent own, while 2 percent rent.
Hamlin Township - 97.5 percent own, while 1.2 percent rent.
Question 4 - Age Categories of Residents (in percent)
0-5

6-18

19-25

26-35

36-54

55-64

65+

9.7

20.4

6.6

13.2

29. 2

9.1

11.8

11.0

19. 9

6.6

14 .2

27.2

7.9

13 .1

Eaton Rapids
Township

7.7

24.8

5.6

13.6

29.4

11.5

7.3

Hamlin
Township

6.5

16.5

8.2

8.2

37.0

11.3

12 .2

City

9.2

24 .5

9.2

15.7

20.3

8.4

12. 7

Townships

8.9

26.8

7.8

16.1

25.3

6.9

8.1

Areawide
City

Census:

Question 5 - Type of Housing Living In:

(percent)

Single-Family

Duplex

Apartment

Mobile

Areawide

86.6

2.1

8.8

1.4

City

81.6

2.9

13 .1

1.3

Eaton Rapids Township

96.1

0

0

2.9

Hamlin Township

97.5

1.2

0

0

City

75.4

Townships

89 .2

1987 Count:

·?.....__.

0
30
-193-

7.8

I

�•

Question 6 - Income Categories (percent)
0-$10,000 $10-$20,000 $20-$30,000 $30-$40,000 $40-$50,000 $50,000+
Areawide

12 .3

19.9

15.4

14 .8

14.0

12.5

City

15.5

20.8

17.1

14.4

12.5

11.2

Eaton Rapids
Township

5.9

15.7

15.7

17.6

14. 7

14. 7

Hamlin
Township

6.2

21.0

7.4

13.6

19.8

14 .8

Question 7 - Persons Employed:
Full-Time
% of Total
Employment
Areawide

Ave./Household

Part/Time
% of Total
Employment

Ave./Household

77 .4

1.56

22.6

1.18

City

80.5

1.57

19. 5

1.06

Eaton Rapids Twp.

70.1

1.55

29.9

1.53

Hamlin Township

75.9

1.51

24 .1

1.12

Question 8 - Three most often mentioned:
City - Clerical, Operators, Managers, Labors, Services, Sales, Specialty
Eaton Rapids Twp. - Technicians &amp; Related Support, Professional Technicians,
Machine Operators
Hamlin Township - Professional Specialty, Machine Operators, Clerical
Question 9 - City of Employment:
'

f

I

I

•
t

Full -Time
Eaton Rapids Lansing

Other

Part- Time
Eaton Rapids Lansing

Other

Areawide

27.7%

45.2%

27.1%

51.4%

27.9%

20.7%

City

30.8%

45.8%

23.4%

52.3%

25.6%

22 .1%

Eaton Rapids
Township

57.1%

20.2%

22.6%

50%

25%

25.0%

Hamlin Twp.

31.7%

49.2%

19%

71.4%

4.8%

23.8%

-194-

�Question 18 - Additional Comments About Residential Development.
There were a variety of comments offered - some in direct conflict with each
other (for example, one respondent said people should be able to build on any
size lot while another thought restrictions should apply to size of house,
size of lot, placement of the house and compatibiliity with the surrounding
area). While a general concensus is not readily available, it could be
inferred that those who made additional comments on this subject generally
believe that additional and more varied housing should be constructed and
more multiple-family housing, especially for the elderly, is needed.
Existing housing needs to be maintained better than it currently is.
Question 19 - Is There Sufficient Commercial Development?

(percent)

Where Should Commercial Development Be?
Downtown
Other
Answer
Area
M-99N
M-99S
No

Yes

No

Areawide

13.8

81.2

5.0

17.2

40.7

31.1

11.0

City

14.4

79. 9

5.9

18. 6

41. l

31.0

9.3

Eaton Rapids Twp.

14.7

82.4

2.9

17.4

41.3

29. 7

11.6

9.8

86.4

3.7

12.7

42.1

36.6

18.8

Hamlin Township
Question 20 -

Comments regarding commercial facilities or services in Eaton Rapids.

~

f

While there were various comments about commercial facilities and services, a
number were stated more frequently than others. These include the need for
family or medium priced restaurants, fast food restaurants, a supermarket, a
movie theatre; the need for more competition; the City has discouraged commercial development. Other notable comments include the need for tax incentives to encourage more downtown commerce in available office space; the need
for specialty stores; and the need to fix up store fronts and develop a theme.
Question 21 - Perceptions About Industrial Development in Eaton Rapids?
Sufficient

Limited
Develop.

Major
Develop.

Limit to
Ind. Park

(percent)

Light
Indus.

Heavy
Indus.
( %)

( %)

( %)

( %)

( %)

( %)

Areawide

3.6

11. 7

28.2

11. 5

35.0

9.9

City

3.8

11.9

27.7

10.8

35.4

10. 5

Eaton Rapids Twp.

3.8

10 .1

2.5

14.6

32.9

10.1

Hamlin Township

2.9

12. 9

30.2

10.1

36.0

7.9

Many respondents gave more than one answer to this question about industrial
development. Over a third of all respondents feel the City should encourage
light industry, while a slightly lower percentage believe that major
industrial development should be encouraged. These responses are fairly consistent among all jurisdictions and indicate that, in general, major
industrial development containing light manufacturing is preferred.
-197-

'

�•
i'

i .;
,, _..
i

L

Question 22 - Types of Businesses Eaton Rapids Should Attempt to Attract.
Respondents were requested to give their 1st, 2nd and 3rd choices for preferred businesses. The total number of responses given for 1st, 2nd and 3rd
choices for each business category were tabulated. The total number of 1st
choice responses for each category was then multiplied by a weight factor of
1
3 1 ; the total number of 2nd choice responses was multiplied by a 1 2 1 and the
total number of 3rd choice responses for each business category was multiplied
by a factor of 1 1 1 • The composite score (total 1st, 2nd, 3rd place answers
multiplied by appropriate weight factors) was calculated for each business
category. On an areawide basis the three categories that accumulated the
highest total points are: 1) manufacturing industries; 2) high-tech
industries; 3) all of the industries identified in the questionnaire. Based
on raw data tabulation, high-tech industries received the most 1st choice
responses, all industries received the next highest number of 1st choice
responses and manufacturing industries received the 3rd highest number of 1st
choice responses.
Among City respondents, the most popular choices based upon the calculation
method identified above are: 1) high-tech industries; 2) manufacturing
industries; 3) agricultural-related industries. High-tech industries
received the largest number of 1st choice responses, manufacturing
industries received the 2nd highest number of 1st choice responses, and all
of the industries mentioned received the 3rd highest number.

•
I.

I

;

'·.
' .

.1
',

For Eaton Rapids Township, results of the weighted calculations indicate
that all industries and manufacturing industries received the highest
point total, agriculture-related industries had the 2nd highest accumulated
point total and educational institutions received the 3rd highest point
total. For 1st choices, all industries, manufacturing industries and hightech industries received the largest number of responses.
Among Hamlin Township residents, weighted calculations result in the
following choices: 1) high-tech industries and all industries; 2) manufacturing industries; and 3) agricultural-related industries. The most popular
1st choice are all industries, high-tech industries and manufacturing
industries.
Question 23 - Restrictions that should be placed on industrial development.

J \

The overwhelming popular concensus is that any industry locating in the area
should be non-polluting or pollution should be minimized. Other responses
include keeping industries away from residential areas; residents should have
a strong voice in the planning and location of industries; industries should
be limited to the industrial park; consider appearance.
'

.

'
! .

'

Questin 24 - Additional Comments Regarding Future Industrial Development.
Most respondents are in favor of industrial development, as long as it do~s
not pollute. Various comments include the suggestions of planting pines in
front of the industrial park, using present facilities before building more,
not giving tax abatements, and not over-developing with industry.

• -·•

-198-

�~-'

Question 31 - Rate facilities and services in Eaton Rapids.
Respondents were asked to rate various facilities and services on a scale
of 1 (very good) to 5 (very poor). An average score was calculated for each
response, with the following results:

- I
I

Five hi!hest ratings
(w1th i having the
highest average score)

Five lowest ratings
(w1th il having the
lowest average score)

Areawide

Eaton Rapids

1. Cemetery maintenance
2. Emergency rescue

1. Cemetery maintenance
2. Library

1. Cemetery maintenance

3. Library, school
faci 1 ities
4. Eatran

3. Emergency rescue,
school facilities
4. Eatran

3. School facilities

5. Trash service
1. City government
convnunication
2. City govt. response
3. Streets
4. Recreational
facilities
5. Sidewalks

Eaton Rapids Township
2. Library

Hamlin Township
1. Emergency rescue

2. School facilities,
Cemetery maint.
3. Library
4. Eatran

5. Trash service

4. Emergency rescue,
Eat ran
5. Nonprofit/service
involvement

1. Streets
2. City government
communication
3. City govt. response
4. Recreational
facilities
5. Sidewalks

1. City government
convnunication
2. City govt. response
3. Streets
4. Recreational
facilities
5. Public buildings

l. City government

5. Nonprofit/service
involvement

2. City govt. response
3. Streets
4. Recreational
facilities
5. Bui 1ding - comrmiun i tJ
pride

I
I"":

~

Question 32 - Three most important services/facilities
Using the weighted scoring system, on an areawide scale, law enforcement,
City government communication and medical services are considered the three
most important community facilities/services. Items receiving the most
responses on 1st choice are: 1) law enforcement; 2) streets; 3) City government communication. Among City responses, cumulative scores placed law
enforcement, streets and medical services and City government responses as
the 1st, 2nd and 3rd most important services/facilities. Law enforcement and
streets received the most responses as the 1st choice while City government
communication and school facilities were mentioned second and third most
frequently as most important. Eaton Rapids Township responses, when
weighted, result in law enforcement, school facilities and medical facilities
receiving the three highest scores. Law enforcement, school facilities and
housing were most frequently mentioned as most important. In Hamlin
Township, the cumulative weighted scoring system results in City government
communication, city government response, law enforcement and medical services
having the highest points, with City government communication, law enforcement and City government response being mentioned most frequently as the
primary facilities/services.

~201-

�Question 33 - Preferred recreational activities:
Areawide
Golf
Bowling
Canoeing
Bicycle/jogging path
Baseball/softball/football
Soccer
Teen Center
Movie theatre
Tennis
Racquetba 11
Other

l

l.

Eaton Rapids

(%)

(%)

4.0
9.5
13.2
19.7
5.4
2.7
18 .5
17.5
3.1
2.3
4.0

4.4

Eaton Rapids
Township

Hamlin
Township

(%)

(%)

3.2
7.7
15.1
19.4
4.9
2.1
18. 7
17 .6
4.9
2.1
4.2

9.4
12.4
20.0
5.0
2.9
18. 9
17.8
3.0
2.1
4.1

3.4
12.3
14.4
18.6
7.6
2.5
16.9
15.7
1. 7

3.8
3.0

Responses were consistent among all jurisdictions. Bicycle/jogging/walking
paths, a teen center, a movie theatre and canoeing appear to be the most
popular choices. Other types of activities mentioned include hunting and
fishing, basketball, boating, swimming, shuffleboard, roller skating, outdoor concerts, ice rink, mini-golf, cross-country skiing, health spa,
fishing, family playground, campground.
Question #34 - Preferred public and private cultural activities.

•
r
I

l.,

,

-

i

Areawide
Performing Arts Theatre
Art Gallery
Museum
Other

Eaton Rapids

(%)

(%)

35.5
15.5
41.2

36.4
15.4
42.3
5.9

7 .8

Hamlin
Township

Eaton Rapids
Township
(%)
37.5
15.9
36.4

(%)

29.5
15.3
42.3
12 .8

10. 2

Responses to this questiori are also relatively consistent among jurisdictions. A museum and performing arts theatre are the most popular choices.
Other suggestions include discussion groups, gourmet dining, good newspaper,
more adult education, high school band, home tours, dinner theatre, activities for teens.
Question #35 - Is City/Township place you want to live long-term?
Areawide
Yes
No
No Answer

•

Eaton Rapids

·Eaton Rapids
Township

Hamlin
Township

(%)

(%)

(%)

(%)

81.7
9.3
8.9

80.0
10.4
9.6

84.3
9.8
5.9

86.4
3.7
9.9

A large majority of respondents said they would like to live in their jurisdiction for a long time. Township residents tend to be slightly more
affirmative about this question than City residents. When asked why,
various responses include friendly people, have lived in the jurisdictions a
long time, convenient location; Township residents like the country, like
their township government, think the townshi·p is a good place to raise a
family. City respondents like the quiet, small town environment, potential
for great schools, pretty setting and low crime rate.
-202-

�Question 36 - Effectiveness in problem solving.
Areawide
(%)

Yes
No
No Answer

25.4
49.4
25.2

Eaton Rapids
(%)
28.5
46.9
24.5

,r--..,_

Eaton Rapids
Township
(%)
24. 5
51.0

24.5

Hamlin
Township
(%)
12.3
59.3
28.4

i

.. /

Overall, about one-half of the respondents do not believe the City is effective in solving its problems. City residents tend to believe the City is
effective more frequently than Township residents. Hamlin Township respondents responded most negatively, with a relatively small proportion indicating yes to this question. Various suggestions given for improving the
City's techniques for problem solving include being more cooperative with
the Township, more public voice in government decision-making, more communication, being more aggressive in problem-solving, establishing a
newspaper.
Question 37 -

Yes
No
No Answer

More input into City's decision-making process.
Areawide
(%)
45.6
26.7
27. 7

Eaton Rapids
(%)
46.9
26.7
26.4

Eaton Rapids
Township
(%)
45.1
22.5
32. 4

Hamlin
Township
(%)
39.5
32.1
28.4

(\

A little less than half of all respondents desire more input into helping
the City make decisions. City respondents have a slightly greater desire
than Eaton Rapids Township residents and substantially more than Hamlin
Township respondents. Many Township residents do not believe it is their
responsibility to become involved in the City's decisions. Various
suggestions for more input include keeping people informed, having open
forums, conducting surveys when large expenditures are proposed, having
input through commercial, service and manufacturing leaders, using newspapers, distributing questionnaires, having a citizens adversary board.
Question 38 - How can Eaton Rapids better serve its residents?
Various answers include letting people have a voice in decision-making,
checking for drug dealers in Eaton Rapids schools, allowing more business
competition, providing more housing, encouraging commercial business
franchises; encouraging cooperation between the City and townships,
upgrading the school system, more recreation, providing more jobs, more
entertainment, community preservation and beautification; having police
department serve surrounding area, having its own newspaper, providing
apartments/duplexes, improving in-town businesses, reducing property taxes,
having activities for young people, fast-food places, and building
an uniqueness of being a small town with the river.

-203-

1;;;;;::::::::::::::::::::::::--------================---=-=-=-=-=---=----=------_-_-_-:_-i:._

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008051">
                <text>Eaton-Rapids_Comprehensive-Development-Plan_1989</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008052">
                <text>Gove Associates, Inc.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008053">
                <text>1989-12-04</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008054">
                <text>City of Eaton Rapids, Michigan Comprehensive Development Plan 1990-2010</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008055">
                <text>The City of Eaton Rapids, Michigan Comprehensive Development Plan 1990-2010 was prepared by Gove Associates, Inc. and adopted by the Eaton Rapids Planning Commission on December 4, 1989.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008056">
                <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008057">
                <text>Eaton Rapids (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008058">
                <text>Eaton County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008059">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008061">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008062">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008063">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008064">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038309">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54683" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58954">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/8ae527172bd59dfad951288ad040c9a4.pdf</src>
        <authentication>915e46deb000d8c2f4c5e7c5c9b789f7</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008050">
                    <text>Railroad

i

•

■

ijn•m•nllllli=

Manistee County
001-DR

Eastlake Zoning

Streams

CJ Water Bodies
CJ Parcels
CJ Eastlake Village ROW

R-2

010-00

E

C-1

Date

500

002-00

024-00
011-10

024-00

007-00

PR

006-00

010-00

1,000 Feet

023-00

BRICKYARD RD

012-10

0
0-0
03

003-00

RD

0

020-00

018-00
003-20

021-00

013-00

LAKE

017-00

015-00

0
028-0

0
027-

0
2-0
03

0
3-0
03

026-00

IC

D
AR
KY

001-DR

014-00

BR

031-00

RIVER

003-00

003-10

003-10

018-10

008-00

RR

008-00

Dan Janicki, Eastlake Village President

009-00

S-1

250

001-DR

R-1

This Zoning Map for the Village of Eastlake is effective as
of December 18th, 2013.

0

¬
«

019-00

This Zoning Map was adopted at a meeting of the Village
Council on December 11th, 2013.

Roads

,........., Eastlake Village

001-DR

M-55

ST

001-DR

This is to certify that this is the Official Zoning Map referred to
in the Zoning Ordinance of the Village of Eastlake, section 1802.

LABEL

Highways

IN

001-DR

Legend

MA

RIVER

N

Official Zoning Map
of the
Village of Eastlake

025-00
022-10

022-00

RIVER

"

036-00

\\
OLSON RD

035-00

039-00

047-00

003-DR

017-00

037-00

003-DR

047-10

\

038-00
048-10
049-00

047-15

044-00

0
4-0
00

SP
LE
GI L

C&amp;O RR

050-00

IE S

009-00

010-00

005-00

T
BR

IC

RD

D
AR
KY

047-20

044-05

034-00

048-00

001-00
015-00

042-10

019-00

030-00

080-00

085-00

087-00

086-00

032-13

032-11

032-09

006-00

051-00

043-00

007-00

006-00

005-00

004-00

002-00

010-00

011-00

012-00

004-00

006-00

007-00

015-00

FOURTH ST

001-00

004-00

005-00

009-00
009-10
012-00

012-00

027-00

013-00

011-00

009-00

025-10

011-50

FIFTH ST

020-00

021-00

014-00

001-10

001-20

001-00

N

005-05

¬
«
M-55

000-00
002-00

030-00

019-00

042-00

041-00

033-00

009-00

007-00

012-00

012-00

.

003-00

DIVISION
. ST'

001
-

00

014-10
016-00

020-00

005-00

011-00
010-00

040-10

004-00

031-00

035-00

039-00

040-00

002-00

034-00

038-00

045-50

HWY

000-00

028-00

029-00

036-00

037-00

043-00

045-00

079-00

026-00

002-00

003-00

N

A
SS
AI

001-70

DR

AVENUE C

046-00

086-00
085-00

THIRD ST

048-00

072-00
073-00
0

RE

018-00

018-00

011-00

014-00
010-00

039-00

056-00

040-00

015-00

029-00

041-00
022-00

022-05

044-00

022-01

094-00

097-00

096-00

048-00

098-00

032-05

032-03

029-10

005-00

006-00

024-00
025-00

END ST

026-00

032-07

028-00

007-00

046-10

095-10

RD

RD

045-00

095-00

009-00

023-00

042-00

093-00

091-00

004-00

021-00

END ST
032-15

008-00

022-00

CANFIELD ST

089-01

092-00

055-00

060-00

061-00

089-00

090-00

081-00

083-00

057-00

068-00

084-00

088-00

010-00

CE

008-00

078-00

079-00

017-00

036-00

038-00

053-00

064-30

CANFIELD ST

077-00

001-00

SIXTH ST

031-00

035-00

002-00

AVENUE A

016-00

054-00

065-00

067-00

075-00

076
-0

066-00

029-00

007-00

027-00

I

066-00

073-00

034-00

001-10

021-20 021-15

FIRST ST

064-00

071-00

025-00

028-00

063-00

SECOND ST

S MAIN ST
C&amp;O RR

069-00

033-00

PINE CREEK RD

037-00

062-00

070-00

074-00

049-00

050-00

SECOND ST

062-00

018-00

022-00

026-00

MILL ST

072-00

088-00

034-00

032-00

059-00

060-00

FIRST ST
014-00

016-00

007-00

024-00

084-00

027-00

063-00

016-00

M
S

0

0

AI
N

ST

01
80

01
90

015-00

032-00

PINE CREEK RD

Y

013-00

021-00

003-00

RD

HW

012-00

023-00

077-10

001-00

017-00

004-00

010-00

064-00

0

078-00

060-00

AE
RF

0650

009-00

069-00
068-00

052-00

059-00

057-00

BE

014-00

008-00

ST

081-00

077-00

003-00

FF

020-00

083-00

056-00

CA

0

006-00

051-00

S MAIN ST

012-0
5

GO

0

005-00

002-00

071-00

ST
MA
IN

0

057-00

0

001-00

053-00

021-00

017-0

001-00

022-00

0
5-0
01

008-00
RD

.1 , 1111
AVENUE B

067-00

00
70

002-00

041-00

0
030
-0

026-00

0
012
-0

AV
E
F
BL
UF

00
60

l

011-00

053-00

WALL ST

003-00

00
50

003-00

025-00

010-00

041-00

008-00

ST

052-00

080-00

FF

028-00

045-00

070-00

030-00

GO

0

I I J:J
042-00

024-00

0
3-0
01

00
40

010-00

039-00

054-00

030-00

035-00

042-00

.----,...--=,-11~=~=-=-=-=-::.J. ;=-=-~~~=-;=-=-=-=-~=-;.=-=-=-~::.:::;;::::.. t- L- . .!. L_ _J_____L_~L.... ;,;J. ,1,1:----n_____l __

089-00 008-00

0

045-00

009-00

011-00

035
-1

036-00

029-00

031-00

031-DR

056-00 055-00

031-DR

033-00

002-00

046-00

011-00

054-00

UNKNOWN

RD

034-00

032-01

007-10

032-10
036-00

\\

006-00

\
i

005-00

I

)

I

007-00

EA

032-10

AK
L
ST

E

RD

033-00

RA

D
ST

VA

E
AV

NE
037-00

008-00

2
475-0

033-20

................

HARRIS RD

C&amp;

475-04

RR

475-04

O

006-00

006-00

002-00

001-00

001-00

009-00

038-00

E
AV

E
AV

EE

IA

SS

R

RN

0R

FO
LI

C&amp;

N
TE

CA

NE

DA

035-00

IR

\

C

O
OL

DR
TH

\

DO

OREGON AVE

\

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008035">
                <text>Eastlake_Zoning-Map_2013</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008036">
                <text>2013-12-18</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008037">
                <text>Official Zoning Map of the Village of Eastlake</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008038">
                <text>The Official Zoning Map of the Village of Eastlake went into effect as of December 18, 2013.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008039">
                <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008040">
                <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008041">
                <text>Eastlake (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008042">
                <text>Manistee Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008043">
                <text>Manistee County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008044">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008046">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008047">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008048">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008049">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038308">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
  <item itemId="54682" public="1" featured="0">
    <fileContainer>
      <file fileId="58953">
        <src>https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/198f3fec62b9229b224c6313d10da4b7.pdf</src>
        <authentication>61d2f9aba0efc321d88af6b48142276c</authentication>
        <elementSetContainer>
          <elementSet elementSetId="4">
            <name>PDF Text</name>
            <description/>
            <elementContainer>
              <element elementId="52">
                <name>Text</name>
                <description/>
                <elementTextContainer>
                  <elementText elementTextId="1008034">
                    <text>VILLAGE OF EASTLAKE
Master Plan and

Recreation Plan
February 2012

Let Our Resources Work For You.

r:r:.i
Northwest Michigan
~ , Councll of Govemments
Workforce • Business • Community

Prepared by:
Northwest Michigan Council of Governments
PO Box506
Traverse City Ml 49685-0506
231-929-5000
www.nwm.org

�Eastlake Village Master Plan &amp;
5-Vear Recreation Plan
Eastlake Village Council

Eastlake Village

Dan Janicki, Village President
Patricia Baumbach
David Drew
Dawn Kramer
Patricia Schmidt
Jason Stamp
Sue Vasquez

Planning Commission

Eastlake Village
Master Plan Committee
Phil Adamski
Bob DeYoung
David Drew
Ritchie Gillette
Dan Golden
Kayla Janicki

Bob DeYoung (through June 2011)
Ritchie Gillette, Chair
Phil Adamski
Patricia Baumbach
Dan Golden
John Franklin
Kayla Janicki

Administrative Staff
Sharon Janicki, Treasurer
Janet Golden, Clerk
Loretta Staff

Prepared by:
Let Our Resources Work For You.

~ Northwest Michigan
, Councll of Govemments
Workforce • Business • Community

2

�Contents
Chapter 1: Introduction........................................................................................................................ 1
Planning Process ....................................................................................................................................... 2
Organization of the Plan ........................................................................................................................... 4

Chapter 2: Existing Conditions and Context .......................................................................................... S
History and Regional Context ................................................................................................................... 5
Population Characteristics ........................................................................................................................ 8
Economy .................................................................................................................................................. 10

Chapter 3: Natural Resources ............................................................................................................. 15
Natural Resources Inventory .................................................................................................................. 16
Issues and Opportunities ........................................................................................................................ 19

Chapter 4: Recreation •...••..•.••..........•......•.......•........•.•.........•.•.•........•...•...........••..•.•....•..•.....•....•....••• 21
Recreation Inventory .............................................................................................................................. 22
Regional Recreational Assets .................................................................................................................. 24
Administration, Funding, and Budgeting ................................................................................................ 27
Issues and Opportunities ........................................................................................................................ 28
Recreation Action Plan ............................................................................................................................ 31

Chapter 5: Land Use ••.•..•......•..................•....•...............•...........•....•...•...•...........••••..........••.•......•..•..... 33
Residential ............................................................................................................................................... 34
Commercial ............................................................................................................................................. 34
Industrial ................................................................................................................................................ 34
Community Facilities and Services ......................................................................................................... 36
Transportation ........................................................................................................................................ 37
Issues and Opportunities ....................................................................................................................... 38

Chapter 6: Goals, Objectives, and Action Strategies ........................................................................... 43
Chapter 7: Future Land Use &amp; Zoning Plan ......................................................................................... 50
Residential 1 ............................................................................................................................................ 51
Residential 2 ............................................................................................................................................ 51
Rural Residential ..................................................................................................................................... 51
Commercial ............................................................................................................................................. 52

�Shoreline ................................................................................................................................................. 52
Public/Recreation .................................................................................................................................... 53

Chapter 8: Plan Implementation ....................................................................................................... 55
Zoning Plan .............................................................................................................................................. 55
Rezoning and Conditional Rezoning ........................................................................................................ 56
Leadership and Public Input .................................................................................................................... 56
Partnerships and Citizen Engagement .................................................................................................... 58
Plan Updates ........................................................................................................................................... 59

Appendices ............................................................................................................................................
2011 Community Survey Results ................................................................................................................
Legal Notices - Recreation Plan ..................................................................................................................
Resolution of Adoption - Recreation Plan ................................................................................................. .

�Chapter 1: Introduction
Since it was founded in the 1870's, the Village

The purpose of the Eastlake Village Master Plan

of Eastlake has changed from a bustling lumber

is to set forth a strategy for the Village to guide

town to a quiet residential community along

future development and change according to

the shores of Manistee Lake. With close con-

the community's priorities. The plan is in-

nections to industrial activity along the shore-

tended to provide for:

line and with the City of Manistee, the Village is

•

known as a bedroom community with access to

Informed decisions: The Master Plan provides a stable, long-term basis for informed

incredible fishing and boating opportunities, a

decision-making. Analysis of existing condi-

small town atmosphere, and historic character

tions, combined with the goals and policies

and heritage.

that are outlined in the Plan, help guide the
Planning Commission and Village Council as
they consider zoning, new development,

To ensure that Eastlake's cherished qualities

capital improvements, and other matters

are preserved and maintained, while allowing

relating to land use and development.

for added investment that will enhance the
local economy and quality of life, the commu-

•

nity must plan and prepare for change.

Optimizing Investments: The Plan provides
for coordination of public improvements

The Eastlake Village ~aster Plan was ere~
ated by the Eastlake Village Planning Commission, with assistance from the Northwest Michigan Council qf Governments. The
P.lan was _
prepared in accordahce with provl~
sions of the Michigan Planning Enabling Ace
(Publi c Act 33 of 2008) to e~hanc~ and pro-

.

Page 1

Village of
East Lake

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

and private development, and also helps
the Village prioritize improvements to com-

The Eastlake Village Master Plan was devel-

munity facilities.

•

Planning Process

Predictability: The Master Plan informs
citizens, property owners, and neighboring
communities of the Village's priorities and
goals, as well as where and how the community is expected to grow-allowing them
to plan for the use of property in a way
that is consistent with the community's

oped by the Eastlake Village Planning Commission and a master plan subcommittee, with
assistance from the Northwest Michigan Council of Governments. The 2011 Master Plan provides background information and public input,
with strategies designed to address changing
population, economic, and land use trends.

vision.

•

Zoning: The Master Plan provides the legal

In order to ensure a broadly representative

foundation for zoning. The Michigan Zoning

planning process and recommendations, public

Enabling Act requires the zoning ordinance

input was obtained from a variety of sources.

be based on a plan designed to meet resi-

Two public forum/visioning sessions were held

dents' needs for natural resources, hous-

on March 3, 2011, and a community survey was

ing, recreation, industry, business, service,

mailed to all property owners and addresses in

and other uses.

the Village, and was also made available and
publicized online.

Survey summaries and re-

sponses, along with information relative to

Page 2

�Introduction

r.evio~§ studies and plans have inform
ntof the Eastlake Village Mast
~vant elements of'the foUowii:ig ·plans _an s u ,es are hi h~ghted/identifiecfthrougho
er Plan:

Manist~e (:ounty Master Plan (2()00) includes poli!=Y base&lt;( on the natur,al ~apabiliti~s.ofthe
la~d to·su·stain development; future ne_eds for variou s types_of development; the relationsfiip

of agricultural and undeveloped land on the eommunit'(s chara·cter and e~onomy the desires
and needs of residents and officials .
•

•

r,,

.

,

-

-

~

'

.~

"

',:&lt;

~

:-

· EnVision Manistee (2005), a county-wiEfe vision for land use ana transportation, was created
.. witb input from a variety of commuoity,stakeholders and provides a clear and citizen-led.focus · •
for a wide range of community re$ourc~s and n~eds, including culture, recreation, economy,
employmE!nt, education, governm1nt growt~/c;hange, health,' public safety, soda(environment~
infrastr;ucture, and natu,raJ resoqrc.e s/environment..
-;f

•

'

,

~

New Designs for (irowth is a best-practice resource guide fo,r local govemrrie!lts and develop;;
ers in Northwest tower·Michigan. New Designs for Growth builds on the ten tenets of smart
gtowth to provide design guidelines thijt preserve·the r~gion's unique character, scenic beauty,
and natui::al resource~.
The Comprehensive,Economic Development Str~tegy (2010) assesses the economic conditions
ofthe region and provides a strategy for buildin·g on strengths and overcoming cha.llenges.

,

,

.

Regional Non:Motorized Comprehensive Strategy (2008) is a facilities stl"ategy for 13 c9unties·

=

in northwest lower Michigan that identifies priority non-motorized transportation projects to
help guide MDOT's investment.in the region',s non-m~toriz~d tr~nsportation system.

•

Benchmarks Northwest (2004) evaluate quality oflife indicators in Northwest Michigan 'by.of. fering secondary data and public perception .(survey) -information that provides a snapshot of
. community strengths anci-challenges, The reports integr~te enviro.nmental, ecpnon,ic, and social factors in a way-that demonstrates the interconnectivity of issues 'impacting regional quality

~Ii~. .

.

'

~

-

, Six Pillars of Prosperity are economic sectors that 't he People and Land/La_nd Policy ln~itute

f6r

h~ve identified as'&lt;-pri_o rity ~reas
Michigan's success in the.·New Economy: Attractive Cities
· and Neighborhoods, Highly Competitive Scho~ls and tifelol')g L~arning Opport_
uriities,· Kn.owl- ~
. edg~ BasJd Technologies, Thriving A~ricµlture, ~atµral ~e,sourc~s for: Recrea(ion a~d Joo Crea;'t i9n, Inclusive an&lt;! Entrepreneurial CUiture.

Page 3

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

public events, are included in the plan appendi-

5.

Land Use. This chapter summarizes the

ces. Plan goals, objectives, strategies, and fu-

character, types, and location of the vari-

ture land use recommendations were devel-

ous land uses found in the village, including

oped based on public input obtained through-

residential, commercial, and community

out the process, analysis of existing conditions,

facilities and services.

and previous or related plans and studies.

6.

Goals, Objectives, and Action Strategies.

Goals, Objectives, and Action Strategies will
address the issues and opportunities iden-

Organization of the Plan

tified in previous plan chapters.

The Eastlake Village Master Plan provides over-

7.

Future Land Use Map and Zoning Plan will

views of existing conditions, discussion of pub-

formalize goals and objectives into future

lic input, identification of issues and opportuni-

land use policies that will be used in mak-

ties surrounding different elements of the com-

ing decisions on zoning changes and new

munity, and goals, objectives, and action state-

development. The map and zoning plan

ments/implementation strategies. Descriptions

will provide a stable, continuous basis for

of best practices, relevant programs, and exam-

land use decision making through changes

ples from other communities are highlighted

in the makeup of elected and appointed

throughout the plan. The plan is divided into

boards, and therefore encourages the im-

sections and chapters as follows:

plementation of the long-term goals and

1.

objectives of the Master Plan.

Introduction provides an overview of the

process and contents.
2.

8.

Plan Implementation, Leadership, and
Civic Engagement. This chapter will provide

Existing Conditions and Context discusses

an overview of the Village's decision mak-

Eastlake's history, its place in Manistee

ing structure, leadership, and other consid-

County and the region, and issues that are

erations that will ultimately drive the im-

relevant across the spectrum of the com-

plementation of the plan. Public participa-

munity, including demographics and eco-

tion, civic engagement, leadership, and

nomics indicators.

partnership opportunities will be discussed
3.

Natural Resources discusses the topogra-

in this chapter.

phy, soils, water resources, and green infrastructure available in and around the Village.
4.

Recreation. This chapter serves as the Vil-

lage's 5-year recreation plan, and discusses
existing recreational facilities and future
needs.
4

Page4

�Chapter -2:
Existing Conditions and Context
with villages and small cities that are consider-

History &amp; Regional Context

able distances from larger metropolitan com-

Eastlake is defined in part by its setting along

munities. These distances have shaped the

the lakeshore and by the natural resources that

character of these small communities and cre-

surround it, as well as its proximity to the City

ated

of Manistee and the surrounding region. This

recognized as retirement and resort destina-

regional context and access to natural re-

tions, as well as desirable year-round commu-

sources have been the drivers for much of the

nities.

individual

identities

that

are

well-

Village's development and economic patterns,
and continue to provide much of the Village's
recreation, service, and employment opportu-

The rural character and access to water, forest,

nities.

and other natural resources has been the region's greatest economic driver. Many communities-Eastlake among them-were built up

Northwestern lower Michigan is a place of in-

around the lumber industry, or served as major

credible natural beauty, tremendous natural

hubs for water-based or rail-based transporta-

resource assets, thriving agricultural econo-

tion. Eastlake had its beginnings in the logging

mies, seasonal recreation and resorts, and year

boom of the nineteenth century, with the con-

-round communities. The landscape of forests,

struction of a sawmill on the shore of Manistee

lakes, rivers, orchards and farmland is dotted

Lake in 1870. The Village later became a stop

Pages

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

on the Pere Marquette Railroad, which supported the logging industry and contributed to
the growth of the Village, which was incorporated in 1912.

In many parts of the region, once the land was
cleared, agriculture became an economic foundation for some parts of the region, while others developed economies around other natural
resources such as oil and gas. In the Manistee
area, however, water- and rail-based shipping
opportunities supported a variety of industries,
particularly along the Manistee Lake waterfront, which provided access to commercial
shipping.

The area's history as a thriving industrial center
and commercial port has resulted in a fairly
stable population base in Manistee County,
when compared to the rapid growth witnessed
in other parts of the region. Between 1920 and
2010, the population in many parts of the region

has

more

than

doubled.

Manistee

County's population, on the other hand, has
increased by about 18% during that time period.

Much of the growth in the region and the
County is the result of retirees and seasonal
residents that have moved to the area to take
advantage of the region's small town and rural
lifestyles, outdoor recreation, and natural
beauty.

However, most of those population

increases-along with the new development

Page 6

�.
:
.
4
~1l:"
~
.
f~~
l1·
, , .,, ,i~j,-'\ _ .. .. . ,

Manistee County
Michigan

-

,~ -·:.· ,:;:;
.
~ ' r-i.A

I,

J•,~( 1

--~p;•""·"

0

-

Upland,Openland
Upland Deciduous Forest
Upland Coniferous Fore~

-

water
l.JMfand Forest

-

Non-forested W!tlands

· ·--• - -

·

~~
. Oj

~

.

.,.,

'

~

.

•""""1

·. --~·

t. 1 .

~

"

1

._,,

,jir,~~, r ~ -- .. . . .

l . ,., .
• ..

.
~;;

.

. I ··

- , .- - - - . - -

.

~

~::-:,11-,.

.

"~t.~f\

.

It .· -·· - ~
,..

. ,iiJ

: . ; - ~ .. ,~....... , ,
1t~

Liil_.J,

'

f .~

"~
__., ~'
)II••,':'-"-.
JI" •k
'
· .

·t:...~~irti,_. ~
--iJllis
J,,.~. ~, .,~~·.·

. . .,..,.i;•," ·-.-~~ •.. •,al' .

•.1

,

.

, .;~

-

,...

,;.rr,;,,- ~.r.
. •~-. •'

&gt;"

',l'~-•·• , I. ,... ~· .

~.-.':.Ji. . .. "f-R..,.

"
: 1

'

,,

'

-~""'w·~. . , ·,,.
~t C

!I'~

- ? '.:!

·· ~"

••~

•II- , .
·• •· • . ,• - .

f . :'" ~,

- •
! -

.

,...-; ,

I

•,

ll, rl ,.

,--: .,)
•

"'-

......

•

C

..

•

C

, ,. -

m

. 't

'.

X

r

q

•'
...

/'

•

"' ·

j • .

S

~ '" Pau

.. .• • .,. .. ...
, .11

.,

.. ~

•"'

"l

❖,

•

...

•

•·

.. ~..

.

~
~.. .

........ .

iiT.
;

'1

Mason County

Data Sources: Land Cover Data &amp; Other data• MichiAan Canta, for GaoAraphic lnfomwti&gt;n, Michiflan GaoAraphic Framoworl&lt; \Atrsion 4b

·.

••·

'
.

.

"'
Ji
• . _·•· ~

,/

~,_:___

..&lt;

.,.

,'f·

~-:. ~. ,"' . . '

•

r•

.

,,

A ..... J:."-''!':
t.&amp;a.!

.. . . . _

:::s

~
'·•:, .
:l.le-. .

, : ,.

-

OQ
I

,··:t ... ,,· I'

... ..._I~~••.
• .•
·,, , ...I' t:l' · ,.,• , • ~,
9«:;.:&lt;:.:,' 1f•1f'9
-t tl.'r
,• :
' :·
·~. •· .
., • .
,.
•
. . '
.
~
. ,,w,
•.
'
.
rr,.'
...
,, I·
•"
r'
,I

~-

•,J

,.. . •

'• .
. :•,~.- ~.' '
.·· •·.......
·,.--:·
.'• ~ ·
·· ,;·.;_•'tr,,

\.
·A. ·,' ..,.
.

•• • ,

•

, •:.,~·•,. '

- - - - --"'- ~ - ~;:.._ ·:" ~ . ·

~

•
...

·

•:, ;·

.

;,,

I~,-,. .'
.,

-~\ . -:~."i

'r

..•:

•

..,;· -

.

•
.•

'

,r

iii'

•

,., . ,&amp;.,,,:-...~•~;ii' .
·, ,WY. ...,~ . .
.

/r ·t.,:,~ ,- ·~• 9&lt;!~'.-:~
'-•·
.':1 ~ ~·::._ - ~ , , .
'..,

..

:~r'1 . --.-J.aa..~~~~•J'amft,.i;~, ,df. }! •b '.

~~'. .~\ ~~•"'Jr
.. ·
:/Y {""_lj , .
~.....•:r(I r-..,.,.. •.•-- I.~ ..!I,:
•111, .,.•
·t•k,,,-._,.
·· ;.• ·./·~.•·•·
llo: 1 : ~·
·" · '
~ ..
·• ·•.•
-- ,,'.!. ~ • ' ?"
••
•

.

-

,,_. ••

•"

!... .

};

• '-

·~m~- 1./,:
..~~. , .~ ~....,, . ,,,,. ~""~ . ~!·. '":' -~~t.:. _,._ ?is .....~ ;.:.:. . . .

J

.,1..q!:

s

.

4

/ )&gt; ·• ' ,
.
r. -,
.

V

. .,

. ,,

0 · :, ,

;, C~ .

~

.1!111,

.•,. · ··1 . . ····.

r.
.. - ~~ -~ . .,_.•. '"'~~- . ....1.,.;,.~;-/ .:: .......... . .~
~: · &lt;J tf ~~~~~ ..,,.:'t!fil~~l '"':J'• ·~:' ~ ·i-:m, ... ":~~~J
A
']':¥
. m~ ~ J.~!-;~~~"?~.a&lt;1l~
if.
.
.... ~. !.,;.:..
~ft..i ,·"'- · , .. , ·( :,..- . t.JJ~.', i~llll'· &lt; · · · .. B~...
l ._.· ·•,.,,:·,""~.P~~..-~~- . ~ ,k ;~ '- -,~,-.; ,:1~.:.t:·!~. -i r" · :»
/ -~ ..i,A.,, J- 1 &gt;'~,,~&amp; ..a:1 11N•'"' i -~~ • :· ·...;. r •• ·1;~ r- - \

/~'!e- ._. ' '

N

··~"'11'1111

•

) .:, ..._ _..-.,,~~,!;,sP ~~1ii,ii~l1 ' , si~c
,
t
, -r ; !. ],... ~ • _,:~~ M
na.."1"\.1.- liiii'i•-:· : ·~ ! .
.. .
'f..• '. /
~~
. . .ff ~-~'
r·"1o··
..,.
.:•- .
'.11 ....... ~ ._,I • .,.,.
,
'Ji!
._~.
'1!~; ."~ 1 •P.b
't.,
,
.
..
""-'
•••1t."
· ., .. '
11p"""
4
, " • • ·~.r.~-.,~ . - . ....,,, ..... ,
"'
/ _. · ~ 1•r
,._
-~-~, ~ • • : l ,· -•.. • ~ ...1 •.'i&gt;ij
·I ..,.} ~ . .. ~ ~
., ~ '1111
,
,rq .
.
"
,
· . . • . . ,"9\~,;, . ~'
1• : ,. ',.
., .
. . . . ~i/ ✓
i,·'~--.
.. .
~
7 ),.:,
\•
,·;t-~•.,.
i,..;_.- ""'· ._;.,r:..,
-4
..
.. . • ..- .
:..
"
•

*0

~=:==--

.

~···1

·~_.,~~l'.t~
- ~ ..2[1~·.
Tt;:; ... ..,~,.,.. dU

~~· ~··.

· ·
. : ', 4.. ~ ,1,''L,..~•·
iJiwJ,.flt
_ .'. • .11_, ~ ;t,,

-'• -

! ' s~'\. .

. &lt;,

-.J

apon :2l0dl:lltr:!)OI

l!/z. ~~i ~
..... . :,;

..

,l +~\.~~~~',tr~~

Ill

lllpPID&lt;lktdtv:

1 ·,

ff "'~~~-·

~

4r.tlaa

·"

il~•/:,,;i~...,...,,..Jni~ •. . . ·.~ . -fjpJ..
.1L.•
·-~ - · - ~ - - 'i~adl..l. .fl. l. ~
'(!If,
.,t&gt;,. ;
'.
r
_..,
•. lll , .,·.i,;.
,•,,,
't J,.,,;~
. , •~l•·
I..~ .
,.,. . - · 'f ~.,.,_,~
. . ' ..~ .,.
·"'--;" • •~
~• .

.'-

-

2

_j

J_•·

l••~_;; :~-.-,.c.r,.~-..., ~'r . t

f!'f~.-~'J•..,1!►-t:~
•••

•

,-.,,.,.J·.- ij~ ·

. ·_:0 ; ~ ; r ,·

'

""._l.,t . . .

" - ' Stare Trunklines

0

.•

18
.,.f, . ,
.
.f·..,_i.t;."'"~.•·~(~.........., . ,.., ··;. .
.-.-r;. . ·., . :
.•...' ~ ,,;_~. ,..
~~~,1~_,.'-""=l"~~a.-i'!· . ~f!1:·~ -~n:~-a
~:·,,.!'- .. , ·;.. ..:.!~ ·. rr,; _· ·~

Bare/Sparse Vegetated
"-..,Roads

"'C

1

·,~ti,~'r',p

1, . N

1~'!iliri"''
~,..
..
. Al , .Ill ~.

-

0

....

j'

Land Cover (2001')
Urban

.,

i~~.; · .1rr-~=t-.,J ·.~iiw.t,.·· ~. ••· ' - ,. .. ·'.:~··•_,:·~.:-'+::.i · .· ·.~.... ·(···~~t;.i. ?.?•~~
-~·\,•m-.i·,n
. lflatl':1'1·.J:t. "
.'.,•/•f .~'.-it{:'•: · /,iq
i. -1E,-.~-~~ ,,: ·,5s'.~-,·., • &lt; . .· ~'11:·n.-, ".· . .l(~~~ •~!9~1

Legend

Aoncullural

'li' ~.;c._,,,. ,·i='~·=·cc..,,;~·-·

_

11
r-,ffll:.i..,;-.~
..
~ .. ·
~
i
lrr;;P.~"i.:;'
.
f.·~
«
~M~~1rj·,
flll"· ·~~ .t~ - -,.&lt;., _.,.-:-; , ~ • ir-:. 1 . llfi~rt·.d
' -~ ~ M ~ · ,..«.:
'· · ·.
,'{;~: ~• ~""'11~'!-:l

"1

..,..

eff

-

·
•

:k-1~~

,t '·•.Mlt ._;']~

0

· , .·-· 7 ~
.

~~;;· : ;, "

I
\

I

. · ·. ·.. o-, ." . •~ ·
:. ,:" •
, 9-· --•c;,;..
•...... • ~ •. .•

~

• ..,.'·-&lt;!;\•.~:

~s.J~f~-- · '"*. ~-:...
-r·;]Z,;;_
.

•

,

•.,;. ··

•;J~1:1!
' ~1 ·· " .'.
.'!.:-·,~. ·_'1l lt
e•

n

0

:::s
a.

a:0

:::s

VI

Q)

,

:::s
a.

n

0

:::s

c t)

~

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

NW Lower 132,183 116,900
Michigan
Manistee
20,899 17,409
County
Eastlake
Village

675

392

129,031

135,488 139,017 158,333 208,286 230,962 281,468 297,912

18,450

18,524

19,042

20,094

23,019

412

376

436

512

514

that follows population growth-have occurred
outside of cities and villages. The desire for rural lifestyles or homes on larger lots, combined
with limited land supply and higher costs in city
and village boundaries, has led to greater
growth and development in rural areas, while
city and village population levels remain stagnant or decline.

21,265 24,527
473

441

24,733
512

Population Characteristics
Household Size and Age
The age of a community's residents has significant impacts on housing demand, service
needs, and employment base; while household
size can reflect changes in community demographics and signal a need for additional housing options.

In part because of these new development
trends, but in large measure as a result of the
decline of logging and other industries, the
population of Eastlake has dropped substantially since its peak in the late 19th century,
when it was home to around 3,500 residents.
With the end of the logging boom, the number
of Eastlake residents dropped to 675 by 1920.
Since that time, the population has fluctuated,
with a low of 376 in 1950. The 2010 population
of Eastlake was 512-a 16% increase from
2000, likely reflecting the construction of new
dwelling units in the Village over that time period.

At 2.22 people per household (PPH), Eastlake's
average household size has declined about 5%
since 2000. The decline in household size is
generally linked with the aging of the population. As the baby boomers-the country's largest population group-reach retirement age,
the number of one- and two-person households increase, as do median age and percentage of the population over age 65. In the Village of Eastlake, between 2000 and 2010, the
number of residents over the age of 65 increased by over 50%. 148 residents, or about
22% of the Village's population, were over the
age of 65 in 2010.

Page8

�Existing Conditions and Context

39,946
ani~te
ounty
ity of M
:tee
State

20%

121,200.

86,500

34,208

125,500

77,400

37,721

30,351

108;600

66,500

48,700

44,667

9%

147,500

Sourer~: 2000 Census &amp; 2009 American Community Survey

cent
Eastlake's population is representative of the

is black or African American. Another

5.6% are of two or more races.

County as a whole, in terms of median age and
percentages of those over aged 65. The median
age in Eastlake is 46.8 years, compared to 47
County-wide.

In 2010, the male-female distribution was 245
to 267, respectively, or about 48% male and
52%female.

Despite the increase in the number of those
over age 65, the number of school aged chil-

Education

dren has remained stable over the last 10

Educational attainment provides an important

years, with about 19% of Eastlake's population

context when considering local workforce ca-

under the age of 18.

pacities and the community's economic vitality,
and plays a role in determining which types of
industries or business may choose to locate in

Sex and Race

or near the community.

The population of Eastlake is slightly more diverse than the County or regional population.
About 90% of the Village's population is white,
compared to 92% in the County and 95% in the
region. About 3% of Eastlake's population is

About 89% of Eastlake residents have a high
school degree or higher, a greater percentage
than surrounding communities and the state.
However, the percentage of those in Eastlake

American Indian, and about one half of a per-

Page9

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

Community Survey, was about 8%, compared
to 12.6% county-wide.

Housing Values
In 2009, the median home value in Eastlake
was $72,900, compared to the County median
home value of $125,500.Median monthly rent
was slightly lower as well, at $559 per month in
Eastlake, compared to $607 for the County.
with a bachelor's degree or higher-about 3% is substantially lower than neighboring commuAbout 42.8% of Village renters, and 34.3% of

nities and the County.

homeowners with a mortgage in the Village,
paid 30% or more of their household income
for housing. When households spend over 30%

Income
Education and income levels are closely correlated, with higher education levels generally
translating into higher incomes. The median
household income in the Village of Eastlake in

of their income on housing, they're considered
"cost overburdened," which puts them at
higher risk of foreclosure, homelessness, overcrowding, or occupying substandard housing.

2009 was $36,042 - slightly below income levels in nearby City of Manistee and significantly

Eastlake overburden rates are consistent with

below County median household income of

regional affordability issues, with over 44% of

$48,690.

Income levels in Eastlake grew by

renters paying over 35% of their household

about 14% between 1999 and 2000, a slower

income for rent and 26.3% of homeowners ex-

rate than regional income growth, but higher

periencing cost overburden on a regional level.

than statewide income growth. However, despite lower overall incomes, poverty rates in
Eastlake were significantly lower than in surrounding communities. The percentage of people in Eastlake with incomes below the poverty
level in 2009, as reported by the American

Economy
Employment Sectors
The American Community Survey reports that
Eastlake has a workforce of about 239. The

Page 10

�Existing Conditions and Context

J\grii:urture, forest

fishir:i

Construction
Manufa.cturing i

Retail ~rade
:fran.sportatio.n and warehausing, and utilities
Information
F-inance ao~ insurance, and real estate and rent.ii
and leasing
Professional, scientific, and management, and administrative aria waste management services
Educatio.nal services, and health care and social assistance .
Arts, entertai
,
recreation, an
dation and fooa services
Ottier services, except public adminfsb"ation

largest employment sectors in the Village were

health and social assistance and arts, entertain-

production, transportation, and material mov-

ment, and recreation.

ing occupations (29.7%), sales and office occupations

(27.2%),

and

service

occupations

(25.5%). The largest industries, in terms of

Eastlake's-and

Manistee

County's-

number of employees, were manufacturing

employment trends are tied to statewide eco-

and retail, followed by educational services/

nomic issues. Michigan has lost hundreds of
thousands of manufacturing jobs since 2000.

Page 11

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

Industry Sectors, Manistee County and the State of Michigan, 2010
Data from Bureau of Labor Statistics
■

'7. !:&gt;late Jobs

Because of the state's traditional reliance on

in Manistee County was 12.7% - slightly higher

manufacturing employment, these job losses

than the statewide rate.

have created a long-lasting recession with
enormous repercussions, resulting in unemployment rates that have persistently been the

It is expected over the short term that the state

highest in the country for the last several years.

and the region's unemployment rates will re-

Northwest Michigan's unemployment rates

main higher than the nation's; however, the

have generally followed state trends, while Ma-

region and the state as a whole are experienc-

nistee County, with its historical importance as

ing growth in several sectors, reflecting an eco-

an industrial and manufacturing community,

nomic transition.

has experienced more job losses than the re-

County's economy through 2020 show growth

gion as a whole. Between 1998 and 2009, ac-

in the finance industry, as well as in agricul-

cording to the US Census, the number of estab-

ture, fishing, forestry, and hunting.

lishments with paid employees in Manistee

•

Projections for Manistee

Knowledge- and skill-based employment is

County declined by 10%, compared to a 5.8%

experiencing significant growth in Manistee

decline statewide; and in 2010, the average

County. The finance industry is expected to

unemployment rate over the course of the year

have the County's greatest increase in em-

Page 12

�Existing Conditions and Context

~ge I
n an

.

.,

Is· orAc ensus is not availa_b

so

ghol!lt

_
nnIa US C:

~he Mast

conducted eve·

to measure population

6asit demographic informs1tion for all geographies in.the countiy.~Hi~torically, the Census "long ··
form" also recorded more detailed information on,individual liousenold charact_
eristics,-includi~g income, employment; poverty, housing value, commute time, et-c. ,Beginning in 2005, tliat· •"
intormation is -instead collected ,eve~ 5 years b¥ the ,American Community Survey.
,,._

The-American Community Survey (ACS) is a large, continuous demographic survey conducted

-

by the Census Bureau-that will eventually pr:ovide accui:ate and up-t~date profiles of America's
, .

~

.

communities eyery year. Questionnaires are mailed to

asample of.addresses to obtain informa-

tio n about hous_eholds and housing units. The survey produces estimates of poi!u.lation and
• housing charact.eristics data for small areas, including tracts and popu1ation s~bgroups. Questions asked are similar,to those on the i:lecennial census long form. Estimates for small geo,graphic areas are based on data collected over a 5-year time period, and represent the average •

QI

1.

'

1!':-

er.istks over that time p.er
,

•

r

.

Bureau of Labor Statist1cs is a unit of the US Department ot Labor that collects, processes,
analyses, and disseminates statistical data regarding current social and economic issues. Data is
availablt? for county geographies, metropolitan statistical areas, and micr'opolitan statistical ar.

•

•

I

ployment, both in terms of total number of

centrations of government employment

jobs (201) and percent growth (26%)

are much higher than statewide percent-

through 2020.

ages (27% vs. 13%, respectively). Government employment is expected to grow by

Manufacturing was identified as a declin-

about 4% through 2020.

ing sector of the County's economy; employment is predicted to drop slightly by

•

another 2% by 2020.

•

•

Employment in agriculture, fishing, for-

estry and hunting is significantly higher

Government employment is the largest
employment sector for the County. Con-

Page 13

than statewide concentrations in this sector, and is one of the largest employment

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

sectors in the County. Employment in this
industry is expected to grow by about 20%
through 2020.
•

The trade, transportation, and utilities
industry is one largest industries in the
county, and is expected to see limited
growth (about 2%) through 2020.

•

Leisure and hospitality employment, one

of the County's biggest employment sectors, is expected to remain at similar levels
through 2020, with about 2% growth.

Employment Location and Commute Time
Because there are few commercial or industrial
uses within the Village limits, much of the community's workforce is employed in nearby communities. Almost all of the workforce drove to
work, either alone or in a carpool; less than half
a percent reported working from home. According to the American Community Survey,
about 89% of Eastlake's workforce was employed within Manistee County, with the remaining 11% commuting outside the County
for employment. The mean travel time to work
was about 17 minutes.

Page 14

�Chapter 3: Natural Resources
The natural resources in and surrounding the
Village of Eastlake are some of its most important economic and quality of life assets. Regional industries rely on access to the area's
natural resources for both raw materials and
shipping needs. Manistee Lake is of regional
and statewide significant for its fishing, boating
and industrial shipping opportunities. A state
game area is located immediately to the north
of the Village, and just outside the Village limits, the state and national forestland covers

To ensure the continued and enhanced quality
of these resources, it will be important to balance community development needs with environmental considerations. The benefits of such
a balance are increasingly being quantified in
economic, public safety, health, and social
measures. Environmental quality and protection can enhance economic opportunities, increases the value of developed properties, and
acts as a draw for new residents and visitors.

over 120,000 acres of the County. These resources are key to Eastlake's quality of life, and
both residents and visitors take advantage of

This Chapter will discuss natural resources

the recreation

and economic opportunities

within the Village, to provide context for plan-

available in the forests, lakes, and streams

ning and future development that considers

within and surrounding the Village.

overall environmental quality.

Page 15

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

acres of Plainfield sands with 35-70% slopes.

Natural Resources Inventory

These areas have severe building constraints

Topography and Soils

and are prone to erosion.

Soils in the area are predominantly sandy soils
with flat or gently sloping topography. Nearly
70% of the Village's land area is covered by

Lakes and Streams

However,

The Village of Eastlake is bounded on the west

because of steep slopes along the Manistee

by about 1.5 miles of shoreline along Manistee

Lake shoreline, much of the Village is located

Lake, a 930 acre lake that serves as the conflu-

within a state-designated high-risk landslide

ence for the Manistee River and Little Manistee

area. Soils along the shoreline include about 22

River watersheds. The lake drains into the Ma-

Plainfield sands with 0-6% slopes.

East Lake
Soil Types

East 1,ake Village
Lakes
Coloma sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Coloma sand, 18 to 35 percent slopes
Coloma sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes

Covert sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Covert-Dair con.,lex, 0 to 6 percent slopes

Dair muck
Gorvan-Houghton-Glendora complex

Histosols and Aquents, ponded

Pits, sand and gravel
Plainfield sand, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Plainfield sand, 12 to 35 percent slopes
Plainfield sand, 35 to 70 percent slopes
Plainfield sand, 6 to 12 percent slopes
Udipsamments, nearly level and undulating

Witer

Page 16

�Natural Resources

nistee Harbor of Lake Michigan through a 1.5

eludes 23 acres under ownership of Little River

mile long channel, and also provides access to

Band of Ottawa Indians, and is the site of the

the Manistee River. As wildlife habitat, recrea-

Little River Band Natural Resources building.

tion opportunity, and commercial waterway,

The Penny Park Campground and boat launch

Manistee Lake is a cornerstone of the econ-

are located along the northern Eastlake shore-

omy, quality of life, and natural environment in

line.

Eastlake and the greater Manistee area.
The industrial history around the lake has reThe lake provides habitat for a wide variety of

sulted in

species, including

lake sturgeon, a state-

oils, brines, resin acids, arsenic, and mercury,

threatened species. Manistee Lake is consid-

and petroleum compounds- in the lake and

ered a high-quality fishing opportunity, and as

shoreline. Brownfield remediation efforts have

such is a critical element of the local economy

been ongoing, and have addressed contamina-

and is significant statewide in terms of its im-

tion within the Village and at other sites around

portance to tourism. According to a 2010 fish-

the shoreline; but elevated levels of contami-

eries report conducted by the Michigan Depart-

nants still exist in some areas of the lake. How-

ment of Natural Resources, the number of an-

ever, according to the DNR, areas near the

gler trips on Manistee lake runs as high as

mouths of the Manistee and Little Manistee are

20,000 per year.

high levels of pollutants-including

not as affected due to the effects of the flow of
the rivers.

Since the logging boom of the nineteenth century, the shoreline along Manistee Lake has
been heavily used by industry. The shoreline
still hosts forestry processing, salt production,
chemicals plants, and power plants, which depend on the commercial shipping opportunities
available through the deep water port in Lake
Michigan. Freighters are able to access factories along Manistee Lake through the Manistee
River Channel, which is regularly dredged to
allow for shipping traffic.

Wetlands and Floodplains
Wetlands-often called marshes, swamps, or
bogs-are areas where water is found, either
on or near the surface, at any time during the
year. These areas are invaluable natural resources for a variety of factors: they offer important wildlife habitat, along with opportunities for recreation such as fishing, hunting,
boating, and birdwatching. They improve water
quality by removing and sequestering excess
nutrients and sediments found in rivers and

Historical industrial uses along the shoreline
within the Eastlake Village limits have been
removed; the former industrial area now in-

streams; and reduce potential for floods by
acting as natural "sponges," slowing down
flood and storm waters. About 87 acres of wet-

Page 17

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

lands-including large cattail marshes-are

some concern that the dike may have adverse

located in the north and northwest corner of

impacts on water levels and fish habitat.

the Village, along the Manistee Lake shoreline.
This area provides important wildlife habitat
and marks the western limits of the Manistee

Green Infrastructure

River State Game Area. Within the State Game

The term "green infrastructure" refers to con-

Area, just to the north of the Village bounda-

nected systems of woodlands, wetlands, rivers,

ries, is a diked area called Peter's Bayou. The

and streams that are valuable in providing a

dike was installed to create waterfowl habitat

variety of benefits to a community's economy

and hunting opportunities; however, there is

and environmental quality. Because greenway
spaces like trails and natural areas are often

Village of East Lake
Green Infrastructure
~

tlon-MD1Dnt110Tllli•

"-'Slalltl'l\ltlldii"'
,...___, Ollle1 ll01111•

~·

1ur...

~ PQttttt1,1t flood PruneAte1ts

Q
t:SJ

0
0

Pubht:lMnd

Other P11ll11t l'"'ll&lt;
SOUIDI.I 'W!IIIW 1Jf0tt!Ghun A,(1215

V\lrtlltlNd Pra1f:tdnm ArBM

~ tt.gh Rt~ l itn1511Jfl AHUls

~\ - '°'flt,CuDutall_,

Map Olte: 15 November 2010
Map Procb:od By:

______

..._

~-~\½~

0.5

1

Mies

Page 18

�Natural Resources

seen as more valued amenities by residents

ents and other forms of pollution such as salt,

than even golf courses or swimming pools,

oil, and anti-freeze.

green infrastructure can increase the value of

smother the habitat that aquatic organisms

nearby property, with corresponding increases

need to survive and reproduce.

Sediment and sand

in tax revenues. And, continuous systems of
forests, wetlands, and other open areas reduce
the risk of flooding by controlling stormwater
runoff, and provide protection from storm
damage and erosion in coastal areas. Green
infrastructure systems also provide invaluable

Normally, these contaminants are filtered out
through rain and snowfall, which naturally filtrate through the earth and recharge the
groundwater. However, on paved, or impervious, surfaces, precipitation instead flows over

wildlife habitat and foster ecological diversity.

the ground, picking up chemicals, dirt, and
other pollutants, then flowing into a storm
Open space and forestland cover about half of

sewer system or directly into a lake, stream,

the Village's land area. About 440 acres of for-

river, or wetland, where it is discharged, un-

ested areas are found throughout the Village.

treated, into nearby water resources. Reducing

Along the boundaries of the Village, forestland

impervious surfaces such as roads, driveways,

generally connects with larger tracts of forest

and parking lots can provide significant benefits

and open space.

to water quality, while also reducing the potential for erosion.

Issues &amp; Opportunities
Water Quality
As noted, historical industrial activity has led
to high levels of contaminants in some parts of
Manistee Lake. Some contamination sources,
including sites in Eastlake, have been or are
being addressed through brownfield remediation activity.

Another contaminant that has been identified
as an issue in some areas of Manistee Lake is
sediment, a surface water pollutant that
washes from roads, parking lots, and driveways
through stormwater runoff, which carries nutri-

Page 19

�Master Plan

Page 20

�Chapter 4: Recreation
Parks, playgrounds, community events, trails,

Because of its importance to all parts of the

and recreation programming bring residents

community, recreation is a focal point in the

and visitors together and foster opportunities

planning process. This chapter will explore

for cultural expression, education, and civic

Eastlake's existing recreation facilities and op-

engagement. They promote public health and

portunities to enhance and improve its parks,

wellness by encouraging opportunities for

culture, and recreation opportunities. This

physical activity. And they act as economic driv-

chapter will also serve as the Village's 5-year

ers, raising property values, drawing new resi-

Recreation Plan.

dents to the community, and encouraging new
development

and

tourism.

Enhancing

Eastlake's recreation opportunities will thus
help create an engaged, healthy, socially vital
and economically vibrant community.

What is a Recreati'on Plan?
Through its recreation grants program, currently funded through the Michigan Natural Resources
Trust Fund and the federal Land and Water Conservation Fund, the Michigan Department of Natural
Resources (DNR) provides financial assistance to communities that are would like to purchase land
for parks, or are planning to improve or develop recreation facilities. To be eligible to apply for these grant programs, a community must have a 5-year recreation plan, approved by the DNR, that
meets certain requirements. DNR-approved recreation plans must include the following components:
•

Community Description and Planning Considerations

•

Administrative Structure

•

Recreation and Resource Inventory

•

Description of Planning and Public Input Process

•

Goals, Objectives, and Action Program

This chapter of the Master Plan serves as the 5-year Recreation Plan for the Village of Eastlake.
Some recreation

plan components will be included in other chapters of the Master Plan.

Page 21

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

R,creatioh; An tmpartant

Recreation Inventory

Gommu:y.t;nity A$S"et
.
-

Several important recreation opportunities are

,,.

.

.-.

:'..

"

,J

,,(

At their -most basic, parks, recreation facilities,

available within Eastlake; and Village residents

· and community events prov,ide an environment

and visitors also have access to a variety of op-

ir:i which residents and visitors can g~ther ai:ld

portunities beyond the Village limits. The fol-

interact in an informal . setting; Qut par:ks also ·

lowing recreation inventory was completed

pro~ide a number of health and economic ben-

with information provided by Eastlake Village

efit s t &amp; the community:

officials and field visits, and provides discussion

• :. Parks ~nca'urag~ J?hysical activity, whict:1 is
critical in staying healthy, r~ducing' stress,

on recreation facilities, as well as regional assets, and their place in the community.

fighting obesity, and preventing chronic ,
conditions that lead to heart disease~ high
··: blood press~re, aAd dia~etes.

Penny Park, located along Manistee Lake, is the

Parks ·and trails are safe c:&gt;ptions for non- ,
motorized transport~tion,:-whi~b is especially itnpon:apt

tor those tt';at d~n't own a,

~ar t&gt;t cai;i't drive due to ag~, disapllity, or ·

.

Village's largest and most frequently used park.
The park includes 38 campground sites, half of
which offer electrical hookup capacity. The
park also includes restrooms and showers for
campers, a picnic area, fish cleaning station,

'

opportunities. ,attract visit0rs,
,. ir\creasiAg local toarism revenues.
•
l
.•
•

Penny Park

"

'

~

•

,a

and boat launch facility. The park is regionally
significant as an access to Manistee Lake, which

Demographic groups with: ,expendable ihcome a~d significant c1mbu.rits, of leisure
time, such as retirees an~ - young profes- ~
, sional, of.t;~n
.felocate to co~munities, with
.
· ,. oriented", lifestyle and a hi
',

also provides access to the Manistee River and
Lake Michigan. Fishing in these water resources
is considered world-class, and as such Penny
Park attracts a large number of visitors to the
community in the spring and summer months.

Penny Park is owned by the Michigan Department of Natural Resources {DNR), and is leased
to and maintained by the Village. The lease
agreement requires that all fees collected for
usage of the park be held separately and dedicated solely to improvements, maintenance,
and staffing at Penny Park.

Page 22

�Recreation

"\ . ,. ,,.
'

.Prio
r ~'Bi.Jou
~

~

1""'

Village of East Lake

Village of Eastlake
Recreation
Inventory

" - ' State Trunklines
~

atier Roads

.............,Railroad
Lakes &amp; Ponds
-·~-

'

~

Rivers &amp; Creeks

. . Public/Recreational

M.,,,.s Irr Lnlw

Village of
East Lake
t

"'

Illa

Page 23

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

Accessibility Assessment: Some of the park's
facilities meet accessibility guidelines.

Regional Recreational Assets
Natural Resource Areas

Johnson Field
baseball diamond,

The Village is surrounded by hundreds of thou-

basketball court, and playground. The park was

sands of acres of national forest, lakes, and

donated by Village resident Art Johnson. Origi-

streams. These natural resources and outdoor

nally used by local softball and baseball

recreation opportunities are prized assets for

leagues, usage of the park has dropped off over

the Village, the County, and the region as a

the years.

whole. 276 miles of rivers and streams in Man-

Johnson Field includes a

istee County-including 45 miles of wild, sce-

Accessibility Assessment: Some of the park's
facilities meet accessibility guidelines.

nic, or natural rivers-wind through the County, offering quality fishing, canoeing, and
kayaking experiences. Additional fishing and

Nature Walk

boating opportunities, along with swimming

The nature walk is located on Village-owned

access, are available in the County's many in-

property in the southern end of the Village, and

land lakes-which total over 9600 acres of sur-

includes a loop through forest area, totaling

face water-and along the 25 miles of Lake

about 2 miles of trails.

Michigan shoreline.

The Nature Walk is

maintained by local scout groups.

Accessibility Assessment: None of the park's
facilities meet accessibility guidelines.

About 73% of the County, or about 253,200
acres, is forested; much of this acreage is accessible to the public as part of the Manistee
National Forest. These areas, both within and

Eastlake Playground
The Eastlake Playground, located on a small lot
behind the Village Hall, was developed in 2011
and includes a new play structure. The park
was developed with donations in an effort led
by Village residents. Additional improvements,
including landscaping and seating, are planned.

surrounding the Village, lend themselves to
outdoor recreation activities like fishing, snowmobiling, hunting, skiing, hiking, and mountain
biking. Access to areas is available for snowmobilers, ORVs, cyclists, skiers, hikers, and others
through several trail systems including the
North Country Trail.

Accessibility Assessment: None of the park's
facilities meet accessibility guidelines.

Nationally significant regional recreational op-

Page 24

�Village of East Lake
Green Infrastructure
~ Non-Motortzed Trals

" ' - ' state Trunkline
~ OlherRoads

RivelS
"'

Lakes

~ Potential Flood ProneAreas

GJ
(?

0
0

Public Land
other Public Lands

Source \Miter Protection Areas
IM!llhead Protection Areas

~ High Risk Landslile Areas
"0

Ill

°di

00
M

V'.9tlands
Forested Land
AgricuMural Land

N

u,
.·' 'l&gt;.~

,!1l1
,·

Map Date: 15 N011ember 2010
Map Produced By:
u.-, u...~~thiol. fuf'IU.4

-

....... NorthW..t Michigan
Councl cl GkMllrv'INtntl

~i

~"kf&lt;lfH

Aln,w,,1 , t""1munll y

f~V7~

:;IC

ct&gt;

n

0.5

\

m
Q)

1

MHes

tt
0
::,

�m
DJ

~

DJ
'7'
It)

Green Infrastructure
~

~

Non-Motorized Trails

DJ
OQ

~ state Trunkllne
~

It)

County Roads

s:

Rivers

DJ
Ill
r+

Lakes

~

Potential Flood Prone Areas

Q

PUblic Land

0

Other Public Lands

Q

0
~"\5

Wellhead Protection Areas
High Risk Landslide Areas
WeUands

l4

Forested Land

"

"'
~
N

Q\

~-

0

4
Miles

Map Date: 26 January 2010
Map Pruduced By:
,r.O,,,..Zf":"""$!\-l'ef.fl!I ~""'· -

~-

" ' Council
Nodllwelt
f,flchlgan
~j
afG~enneull
~i,;,v:r•
~w,i,,r','•(0,1'

•Ill&gt;!\&lt;

-,

Manistee County

Source Water Protection Areas

f::'.],

It)

""C
DJ

::::,

�Recreation

portunities-including the Sleeping Bear Dunes

The seven-member Village Council is elected

National Lakeshore in Benzie and Leelanau

every two years to adopt budgets, approve

Counties-are located within an hour's drive

contracts, adopt policies, and oversee staff.

from the Village and are easily accessible to

Budgets, planning, staffing, and other issues

Manistee residents.

related to the parks and other Village facilities
are overseen by the Village Council.

Snowmobile and ORV Trails

Snowmobiling is a popular winter activity for

Staff &amp; Volunteers

both residents and visitors. In addition to desig-

Parks are maintained by Village maintenance

nated trail systems, within the national forest,

staff, which includes one full time employee. A

snowmobiles and off-road vehicles (ORVs) are

park attendant for Penny Park is employed sea-

authorized to use Village street right-of-ways.

sonally.

Some maintenance is conducted by

volunteers or community services groups.

Private Recreation Facilities
Private golf courses, campgrounds, and other

Funding &amp; Budgeting

amenities are available throughout the Village

Funding for park maintenance, improvements,

and County.

and activities comes from several Village funds.
Penny Park improvements, maintenance, and
staffing is supported by campground fees,

Administration, Funding and
Budgeting

which are deposited in a park fund dedicated
solely to Penny Park activities. In 2010, about
$14,000 was budgeted for Penny Park.

Village Council

Page 27

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

Maintenance for the Nature Walk is supported

Maintenance and improvement activities at

by a percentage of funding from the Major

Johnson Field are supported by funding from

Street and Local Street Program. Funding is set

the "general maintenance" fund; $1,000 was

annually based on federal guidelines for the

budgeted for this fund in 2010.

maintenance and upkeep of off-road areas.

$5,049 was budgeted for off-road street
maintenance in 2010; funds cover both nature
walk maintenance and landscaping along the
tunnel of trees.

Issues and Opportunities
How does Eastlake build on its recreation assets? Where are improvements needed? What
is missing from the recreation system? What
types of recreation opportunities do residents
need and want? To begin to answer some of
these questions, issues and opportunities have

Recreation Priorities:
~~

been identified for consideration in goal

201-:t Survey Results

setting, action planning, and policy developThe 20P Maste~ Plan Surve,y asked respond- , ment.
ents abo1:Jt the importance of the devel9pment ,
or enh~neement of the following types of rec~:
reation. Follawirig are the percentage or

sponse~ that indicated that _these acti~ities, are .
"very important" or "somewhat important."·

1

Demographics

re-, .

!

Different population groups have different rec-

'

reation needs and interests; so when planning
for

recreation

facilities,

the

community's

growth trends, age, and income levels are imfis~in~ access

91%
,,

portant factors to consider. Eastlake has seen

Boating access

86%

some population shifts over the last ten years,

Playground equipment

68%

Athletic f.ields/tennii co~rts

56%

drop in the number of family households, and

Hiking/skiing trails

52%

increasing numbers of seniors. As individuals

Swimming

51%

as noted in Chapter 2, Existing Conditions and
Context, with a decreasing household size, a

age, needs increase for facilities that accommoUniversal accessibility features ·46% ,
Snowmobile/ORV use of Vil- 41%
. lage streets
(,

. -Snowmobile/O~V trail$

date passive recreation such as walking and
boating. Barrier-free access to recreation is particularly important for an aging population, and
the provision of barrier-free recreation will become an increasingly high priority as the population ages.

Page 28

�Recreation

With nearly a quarter of the Village's population under the age of 18, youth-oriented recreation opportunities will continue to be important both for current residents and as an

Planning Process
The recreatiort plan was developed with guidance from the Eastlake Village Planning Commission and Master Plan Committee, with assistance from the Northwest Michigan Council of

amenity to draw new families to the Village.

Governments (NWMCOG).
In addition to age considerations, it's also important to ensure that activities and amenities

Public Input

in the community are within the financial

Public input was obtained through Committee

means of the majority of residents. Because

input, a Village Master Plan Public Forum held

per capita and median household income in the

in March 2011, and a community survey that

Village are lower than the County and the State

was mailed to all Village addresses and proper-

of Michigan, the need for free activities or low-

ty owners in March 2011.

er prices to accommodate families and those
with moderate incomes may be important.

Recreation Plan Comment Period
Notices were posted relative to the availability

Penny Park

of the plan for review on November 25, 2011

Public input shows that Penny Park activities-

and December 23, 2011. No comments were

namely boating and fishing-are considered

received during the plan comment period.

important priorities, and the 2011 Master Plan
survey showed that a majority (78%) of residents would support overall improvements to

Public Hearing and Adoption

the park. Support was even higher for specific

Public hearings were held on January 11, 2012

improvements relative to boating and fishing,

and February 8, 2012. The Planning Commis-

with a significant majority of respondents

.sion recommended adoption of the Recreation

(91%) answering that development or enhance-

Plan to the Village Council on January 11, 2012.

ment of fishing access was somewhat or very

The Village Council approved the plan on Feb-

important. 86% felt that boating access im-

ruary 8, 2012.

provements or enhancements were important.

In addition to support expressed in the survey,

Page 29

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

discussions at the March 2011 public forums
recreation comments were centered on Penny
Park improvements, as follows:

Johnson Field
2011 survey results and forum comments indi-

•

Dredging canal to improve fishing access

•

Floating dock to enhance accessibility

with only 16% of survey respondents stating

•

Linkages to the Village and other parks

that they use the park. A low percentage of

through a trail or stairway from Johnson

survey

Field to Penny Park

they're satisfied with the park. At the public

cate that Johnson Field usage is generally low,

respondents

(25%)

indicated

that

forums, residents discussed low usage, con•

Landscaping, maintenance, and general
improvements to address issues and needs

for lighting, waste, signage, and landscaping.
•

cerns over maintenance of the park, and an
interest in improvements to the ball fields, dugouts, and lighting, to encourage greater usage
by local softball and baseball teams, including

Improvements to restrooms and showers,

Little League.

including universal accessibility features
•

Swimming access is not currently available

on Manistee Lake, due to marsh areas

Nature Walk and Trails

along the shoreline. A number of beaches

The Nature Walk lacks linkages to other trail

that provide swimming access to Lake

systems, which may contribute to relatively low

Michigan are available in nearby Manistee.

usage levels.

Access to Penny Park is currently only available
from an access drive located outside of the Village's primary residential area. A trail and stairway from Johnson Field to the lakefront and
Penny Park were identified in the public forum
as possible recreation improvements that
would enhance access and usage for residents.
Public discussions also included linkages to existing snowmobile and other trails within the
National Forest, with parking availability. Connections such as these between Penny Park,
Village neighborhoods, other Village parks, and
surrounding trail systems could enhance use of
the community's resources and attract visitors

Page 30

�Recreation

Timeframe

Goal/ Action
General Improvements

2012

Install security cameras

2012+

Provide accessibility features at all parks
Provide for parking and landscaping improvements at all parks
Penny Park

Dredge canal

2012

Implement general park improvements to campsites, access,

2012

signage, and park facilities
Develop a floating dock

2012+

Provide electric hookups for all campsites

2012+

Johnson Field

Improve lighting at the ball fields

2012+

Provide for parking

2012

Develop a gazebo or picnic area

2012+

Nature Walk

Provide for parking

2012

Pursue trail expansions and/or linkages with nearby trail sys-

2012+

terns
Eastlake Playground

2012

Landscaping and seating improvements
Other

Develop a "snowmobile route" with posted signage from trail

2012+

throughout the Village
Explore and consider implementation of a trail or walkway
providing access to Penny Park/Manistee Lake shoreline from
Village residential areas

Page 31

2012+

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

looking for mountain biking, snowmobiling, or
other trail-based recreation opportunities.

Community Events
Discussion at public forums included comments
about historical community events and declining participation. Festivals and other community events to celebrate local history could help
build public pride and community engagement.

Page 32

�Chapter 5: Land Use
An understanding of existing land use patterns

ment and redevelopment, and are based

is required to ensure that any future develop-

on the goals and objectives of the commu-

ment or redevelopment is compatible with the

nity, as identified in the planning process.

Village's existing character, environmental fea-

The future land use map is not intended to

tures, community needs, and vision and goals.

be parcel specific; future land use recom-

The Master Plan addresses land use through

mendations are intended be used as a long-

analysis

portrayed

range (20+ years), general guide for devel-

through several types of maps and descrip-

opment patterns. Desired results are not

tions:

expected to occur in the near future.

•

and

recommendations

The existing land use map and descriptions
identify the current, "on the ground," uses
of properties within the Village, regardless
of what is permitted by zoning or recommended by the Master Plan.

•

sions, this chapter includes descriptions of existing land use and neighborhood types found
in the Village, as well as issues and opportuni-

Zoning identifies the permitted land uses
for development and redevelopment for

ties that have been identified for each use.

each geographic area in the Village. The

Residential

zoning map shows what is allowed to occur

A sizable majority of Eastlake's developed land

legally on a parcel-by-parcel basis, regard-

•

To provide a context for future land use deci-

area consists of residential uses. The 2010 Cen-

less of the current existing use for that par-

sus reports that there are 266 housing units in

cel.

the Village, of which 231 units (87%) are occu-

The future land use map and descriptions

pied.

identify the preferred patterns of develop-

Eastlake Zoning Ordinance &amp; Relation to the Master Plan
The Master Plan and Zoning Ordinance are closely connected, and both have important impacts on
'land use and development. The Michigan Zoning Enabling Act {PA 110 of 2006) requires zoning to
be based on ari adopted plan that is designed to promote the health, safety, and general welfare of '
all citizens. The master plan provides guidance for zoning decisions, including amendments to the
text or the zoning map. As such, zoning is the method most commonly used to achieve master plan
goals. However, it's important to recognize that the Master Plan is only a guide, and does not have
the rule of law and cannot enforce where or how something is built. The Zoning Ordinance, on the
other hand, is a legally enforceable law that regulates land and buildings, and establishes standards
for development.

'
Page 33

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

Commercial
Commercial land uses make up only a small
percentage of the Village's land area. One commercial establishment, a restaurant, is located
on M-55, a second is located within a residential neighborhood, and a third is located along
the Manistee Lake shoreline. However, significant acreage is currently zoned for commercial
development along M-55.

Industrial
According to the 2009 American Community

There are currently no industrial uses within

Survey, Eastlake's housing stock primarily con-

the Village. However, significant acreage along

sists of owner-occupied single family homes

the shore of Manistee Lake has historically

and mobile homes.

been used for industry. This area, which currently has access to rail service and has been

•

Single Family Residential: The majority -

86% - of the Village's housing stock consists

considered for new industrial development, is
zoned for industry.

of single-family detached homes.
•

Mobile Homes: A mobile home park, the

The Village of Eastlake also owns 10 acres in

Village's newest housing development, is

the Manistee Industrial Park Renaissance Zone.

located on the south end of the Village.
According to the American Community Survey, about 7.8% of the Village's housing
stock consists of mobile homes.
•

Multi-Family Residential:

Community

Facilities

and

Services

About 5% of
Community facilities and services play an im-

housing units are 2 or more units.

portant role in the Village's vitality, and serve
health, recreational, and government needs of
Over half of the Village's housing stock was

the Village. The quality of these services and

built before 1960, and about a third was built

facilities is linked inextricably with the Village's

prior to 1940.

quality of life. These uses are closely aligned

Page 34

�Land Use

. Eastlake Housing Stock
Occupied and Vacant Housing Units
#

Occupied Housing Units
Vacant Housing Units

For rent

231

86.8%

35

13.2%

16

45.7%

Rented, not occupied

0

For sale only
Sold, not occupied
For seasonal, recreational, or occa-

5

14.3%

1

2.9%

sional use

6

17.1%

All other vacants

7

20%

Source: 2009 American Community Survey

Year Structure Built
Source: 2009 American Community Survey

1990to
1999

earlier
31%

--1%
1980-1989
4%

1970to 1979
8%
6%
9%

Page 35

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

with residential areas, and are often considered

Eastlake has no central water or sewer system.

to be part of the neighborhood. There are sev-

Homes and other structures are serviced by

eral public facilities in the Village, including

private wells and septic systems.

parks, Village offices and service areas, the
Little River Band Natural Resources building,
and the Eastlake Post Office. Other critical ser-

Other Facilities and Services

vices and facilities that meet community

Many essential services are available nearby in

health, educational, and other needs are locat-

Manistee City and Township:

ed nearby in the City of Manistee and Manistee
Township.

•

Medical Facilities: The West Shore Medical
Center, a 25-bed nonprofit, acute care criti-

Village Hall

cal access hospital that provides emergen-

The Village Hall, an historic structure located in

cy, diagnostic, treatment, and rehabilita-

the center of the Village, serves as community

tion services, is located on Parkdale Avenue

meeting and event space, and houses adminis-

in Manistee Township, about 4 miles out-

trative offices. The hall was built in the late

side the Village of Eastlake.

nineteenth century.

•

Schools: Eastlake is located in the Manistee
Area Public School District.

•

Village Services

Libraries: Manistee County operates several libraries, in Arcadia, Bear Lake, Kaleva,

The Village Fire Department is a volunteer fire

Manistee, Onekama, and Wellston.

department. The department, formed in 1881,
is one of the oldest in the state.

A Village-

owned storage building houses fire equipment.

Transportation
Highways and Streets

Other Village-owned property include the leaf
dump/compost site, four parks, and open land.

M-55, an east-west state highway, bisects the

About 80 acres of Village-owned property are

northeast quarter of the Village.

located near the southern Village boundary.
Parks are addressed in detail in Chapter 4, Recreation.

The Village maintains 8.47 miles of streets, including 2.55 miles of major streets and 5.92
miles of local streets.

Utilities

Page 36

�Land Use

All-terrain vehicles and off-road vehicles, in-

is located on Village-owned property in the

cluding snowmobiles, are permitted in the Vil-

south of the Village.

lage street rights-of-way.
Transit

Air and Rail

The Village's public transit needs are served by
Regional air service is available nearby at the
Manistee-Blacker Airport, located three miles
northeast of the City of Manistee. A new terminal built in 20007, along with new security
fencing and instrument landing system, have
enhanced the services of the airport.

the Manistee Transportation Authority, a private nonprofit corporation.

Established in

1975, it receives funding from state and federal
sources along with county tax revenues from a
dedicated transportation millage that supports
public transportation services.

MCT provides

dial-a-ride service within a service area of
Rail lines are located in the Village of Eastlake
along the shore of Manistee Lake. Freight is

about 544 square miles; in 2010, over 109,000
passengers were served by MCT.

the primary usage of the rail system, which currently provides services to Manistee industries.

Public transit is most frequently used by four
groups: those with low incomes, seniors, individuals with disabilities, and households with

Non-Motorized Transportation

limited access to vehicles. About 40% of MCT's
Some residential streets are served by side-

total ridership is comprised of seniors and per-

walks. The Nature Walk, a non-motorized trail,

sons with disabilities.

Page 37

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

and population ages, it's important to provide a

Issues and Opportunities

variety of housing types and sizes to accommo-

Residential Character &amp; Development

date the needs of smaller households and an

Public input expressed a strong desire to maintain and enhance the primarily residential character of the Village, with survey results and
public discussions both stressing an interest
and priority in preserving the existing mix of
land uses. 92% of respondents to the community survey indicated support for maintaining the

aging population.

Currently, the majority of

housing stock for sale consists of mobile
homes. Additional housing options and land
available for residential use will be an important consideration.

New Commercial Development

primarily residential character of the Village. As

Public input throughout the planning process
included discussions about opportunities for

might be expected from these responses, there

new commercial development. Survey respons-

was also strong support for new single family

es showed low levels of support for general
commercial development; but when more spe-

home development.

cific questions were asked relative to neighborhood commercial development- i.e. small re-

Household Characteristics and Housing
Demand

tail, services, or offices-support increased to
59%. Just over half of respondents supported

Trends toward shrinking household sizes mean
that more housing units will be needed simply

the idea of additional highway commercial such
as gas stations and retail. In public forums, dis-

to maintain existing population levels. Changes

cussions expressed an interest in small scale

in demographics will also result in changes in
housing demand. As household size declines

commercial

uses that could meet residents'

basic shopping needs, such as a small grocery

1

Best-Pr~c;tice: Planned Unit Devel9pments
.

'

A planned unit development (PtJD) is a zorting techoiqu~ that acts a~ a type of overlay or supplement to existing zoning. PUDs allow some flexibility in terms of use, density, and site layout, but
also include a special review process, in which the site plan is reviewed in the context of adopted
community goals or standards that are included jn the PUD ordinance. This technique is often used
. in creatihg iarge-scale, mixed-use developments, as they provide a certain level

of flexibilfty that is

.balanced with community involvement and accountability.

The tei:rh
"PUD"
is often used interchangeably t9
,.
.
zoning regu1ation.

.

mean both the development itself, as well as the.
.

'

Page38

�Land Use

store or convenience store. Responses and discussions generally appear to support the idea
of some small scale commercial development,
but only if it allows the Village to retain its residential character.

New industrial development
The 2011 Master Plan survey showed very low
levels of support for industrial development,
particularly relative to heavy industry (about
8% positive responses). However, there were
more positive responses for light industrial activities like high-tech electronics and computer
-related manufacturing, with about 51% indicating they would support this type of development.

ing units of government, including Manistee
County, Manistee Township, and Little River
Band on some initiatives. Several comments in
the surveys and public forums addressed the
potential for partnership with other communities on some issues.

Village hall
Due to its age, the Village Hall needs some rehabilitation. An energy efficiency audits was
completed in 2011, and indicated needs for
new lighting and improvements to building envelope, systems (including heating), and controls, in order to improve efficiency and reduce
energy consumption and costs. Some structural
improvements may also be necessary.

Partnerships
The Village of Eastlake has successfully implemented partnerships in the past for community
services such as maintenance and beautification efforts. There has been discussion on exploring opportunities to partner with neighbor-

Page 39

�Village of Eastlake Zoning

Pine Creek

Legend
""'-.,Roads

(ii

East Lake Village

£3,

Lakes

""-- Rivers

Zoning

~ Commercial
Agriculture

~ Industrial
~ Public Purpose

15th

..;
~

Residential
16th

(=:) Residential 2

The information included in this map was provided by the Village of Eastlake in
2011, and may not reflect the most current conditions. Please contact the Vil-

Single Family
Discretionary

lage for the official Eastlake Village Zoning Map.
Created: June 2011

Page40

�Village of Eastlake: Existing Land Use

Pine Creek

Legend
,.,.__ Rivers
~ Roads

Lakes
Existing Land Use
. . eommercial

orestfOpenSpace
ubliC

Page41

�Page 42

�DRAFT 9-13-11
Chapter 6: Goals, Objectives,

&amp; Action Statements
The goals, objectives, and action strategies in
this chapter are intended to guide future devel-

Land Use

opment, policy initiatives, and other activities

Goal:

in a manner that reflects the community's val-

and design that meet the needs of existing

ues and priorities. These goals were developed

and future land uses, while maintaining and

using public input, previously adopted plans

enhancing Eastlake's sense of place.

and studies, and analysis of current conditions,

Encourage balanced land use patterns

Objective

as discussed in previous plan chapters.
Improve the quality of existing housing stock.

•

Provide consistent enforcement of Village
ordinances.

In order to appropriate!
b~ing made towards the community's vision-it's important to undetsta
'

-

, ~

~

1'~

their relatiao~hip to ~~ch other.

Goals

descri tion o t e e

provide g_eneral direction and se •

issues .and spe~ific ne

ibjectives

t ar4;! broad in s

are a ~eans of ~diieving·goals, !3n~ are attainable.

Gtion Strategies

fih the 51&gt;ecifits nece;a

'igbt be qs~d to a.ceomplis,h multiple_objectives; or
ie_s, /\ctio~ strategi

·· ' implementation tool

Page43

·
-·

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

•

Work with community partners to provide

with minimal noise, lighting, emissions, or

and promote housing rehabilitation pro-

environmental impacts to adjacent uses.

grams and incentives.
•

•

•

Allow for some low-impact commercial

Continue and enhance enforcement of ex-

type uses such as home occupations, cot-

isting nuisance and land use regulations.

tage industries, or office space in nonconforming buildings, provided impacts to
neighboring residential properties are minimal.

Review staffing and administration to ensure regular enforcement of existing regulations.

Objective
Provide for a range of housing types, sizes,

Transportation

and prices.

Goal:

•

Continue to provide for a range of housing

transportation system.

densities throughout the Village.

Objective

Encourage high-quality housing infill devel-

Provide a balanced, high-quality, multi-modal

opment in existing residential areas.

transportation network that provides safety
and efficiency for all users.

•

•

Consider zoning changes to allow for a
range of housing sizes or types that are

Provide a safe, efficient, and balanced

Action Strategies

consistent with existing residential
•

neighborhoods and character.

system to provide for traffic flow that is

Objective

safe and efficient for all users, including

Provide for a range of uses to support the service, shopping, employment, and recreation

vehicle/truck traffic, pedestrians, bicyclists,
and others.

needs of residents and visitors.

•

Action Strategies
•

shoulders on street pavement for bicycles.

Regularly review, and if necessary, update,
•

•

Explore the creation of nonmotorized linkages to nearby trail systems, parks, and

to ensure ...

neighboring communities.

Provide for commercial uses that meet the
basic needs of residents and visitors, with

Create separate bike/walking paths, where
needed and feasible. Consider safe, wide

Village zoning and other land use policies

•

Maintain and improve the existing road

•

Develop private road standards to accom-

minimal impacts to residential neighbor-

modate small-scale developments. Stan-

hoods.

dards should address road width, design
specifications, surfacing types, and mainte-

Provide for well-designed industrial uses

Page 44

�Goals, Objectives, and Action Statements

: Village'Charact:er
av~ trees on Bullfrog

-

eed a g~ea\~r sen.se of Rlc!c
egative image ,
etter upkeep -=-_maintain or i

s tG celebrat~

"Mai'ntain residential character

-prov_efi~hi~g

·Keep :f be V.illage 'the,s~·me as it
efficiency,

acilities ,:·services

•

_ ~~ndscaping/pla_
n ting with native plan
Beautification -flowers, trees, etc

fiotentiaJ for sale or development of
owned land. _

separ,ate fr om Manist

- Use prison or jail workers for com"!u

br-ate hetJtage
-Market and advertise assets "

Provide improvements to Village
his!ori c character

Keep walkable, safe and quiet
•

Preserve Bullfrog Alley

_Organize more comrnunity events - community
yard sales, picnics, art fairs, softball; "8tc.
·

Management of government employees ·

Restore sense of community

ome a charter city

•

Attract' more young families

•

Need more jo'bs tC? attract new residents

ntial partilership opporturait-ies wi

•

,Make safer routes to bus stops
Fire department upgr;de - own building ·

Vision:.Recreation &amp; Natural Resources ·

Renewable}alternative energy sources for local
su.stainability

OP,en up y,,ater way ta Penny Park
-·

#I'

Build stairway from ball field to Penny Park.
•

Basic-recreation improvements

Vision: Land Use

Upgrades at Johnson Field - lighting, dugouts,
parking

•

•

flshi,ng dock-floating docks?
••

Condos
Restaurant' _
0

•

•

Dredging_
-Fishinglpknic/water access
·

rails ,,,_

L-i~ht industry- home business, live/work
Mini-mart on M-55

t:

Kee.p the buffer between the industria·1park and
the Village

k impr6vements -: Ian $Cap111g, re ,
imming opporfuoities,. increased infraure i.eAfa~dica-p a
· ·· '

Stnall-scaJe comme'ricial uses

ming area possibilit

Resjdentiai'and com'Cmercial growth couldincrease:revenue
~

Botential for nea

- - mercial dev.e

Keep residential ~tmosphere

with DNR
de snowmobile/ORV _
.
ot and trail int
reet. Regulate

Small light quiet. commerce/industry ,
II grocery, gas station, bait st9re,.·

.

~ ta.national

Page45

.

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

nance agreements, at a minimum.
•

•

opportunities in civic spaces.

Support the region's public transportation
system.

Encourage and support arts and cultural

Objective
Preserve Eastlake's historic and unique char-

Quality of Life &amp; Sense of

Action Strat egies

Place
Goal:

acter

•

necessary.

life and small-town character of the Village of
Eastlake.
Objective

Maintain willow tree "tunnel of trees"
along Bullfrog Highway, replanting when

Maintain and enhance the quality of

•

Celebrate heritage with community events.

•

Encourage and support historic preserva-

Encourage citizen engagement in local govern-

tion programs and efforts at the Village Hall

ment and community events.

and in Village neighborhoods.

Action Strategies

•

Promote and encourage the use of parks

Natural Resources

and civic space for community events and
festivals.

Goal:

Protect and promote Eastlake's natu-

ral features
Objective
Preserve and enhance natural areas such as
wetlands, floodplains, and woodland areas
Action Strategies

•

Support and participate in the development of a Manistee Lake plan that addresses water quality and other environmental issues within the lake and along the
shoreline

•

Work with DNR and other stakeholders to
pursue habitat restoration in bayou area of
Manistee Lake

•

Page46

Work with Little River Band on shoreline

�Goals, Objectives, and Action Statements

redevelopment .
•

provements at all parks

Continue to work with Manistee Lake
stakeholders toward water quality im-

•

Dredge Penny Park canal

•

Implement general Penny Park improve-

provement measures.

ments to campsites, access, signage, and
park facilities
•

Develop a floating dock at Penny Park

•

Provide electric hookups for all campsites

nities for all ages and abilities, that meet the

•

Improve Johnson Field lighting

community's existing and future needs .

•

Provide for Johnson Field parking

Objective

•

Recreation
Goal: Provide a variety of recreation opportu-

Develop a gazebo or picnic area at Nature
Walk

Maintain and improve existing parks.
•

Action Strategies

Provide for parking at the Nature Walk

•

Install security cameras

Objective

•

Provide accessibility features at all parks

Consider trail linkages and expansions to en-

•

Provide for parking and landscaping im-

hance access to additional recreation and
transportation options

Page47

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

Action Strategies
•

•

•

Community Facilities &amp;

Pursue trail expansions and/or linkages
with nearby trail systems

Services

Develop a "snowmobile route" with posted

Goal: Provide cost-effective, responsive, effi-

signage from Nature Walk trail throughout

cient services and facilities that adequately

the Village

meet the community's existing and future

Explore and consider implementation of a
trail or walkway providing access to Penny
Park/Manistee Lake shoreline from Village
residential areas

needs.

Objective
Maintain and improve existing community
buildings, facilities, and services.

Objective

Action Strategies

Provide cost-effective, responsive, efficient
recreation services and facilities

Action Strategies

•

Improve public building facades.

•

Update Village hall interior and implement
energy audit recommendations and necessary structural improvements.

•

Appoint a 5- to 7-member recreation com-

•

web presence.

mittee to oversee park improvements and
activities and make recommendations on

Develop and promote an effective Village

Objective

park activities and budgets to the Village
Provide cost-efficient, effective Village ser-

Council.

vices.

•

Maintain an updated 5-year recreation
plan.

Action Strategies
•

Implement energy efficiency features in
community buildings and facilities.

•

Work with other community organizations
to address improvement or expansion
needs.

•

Pursue grant funding and donations for
projects when applicable and available.

Page48

�Goals, Objectives, and Action Statements

on areas of mutual concern.

Partnerships, Cooperation, &amp;
•

Civic Engagement
Goal:

Partner with nonprofits and community
groups on fundraising and implementation
activities.

Work closely and collaboratively with

neighboring communities, stakeholder groups,

•

Coordinate with service groups, nonprofits,

and the public to implement shared goals and

schools, and other community partners to

objectives.

encourage civic engagement and volun-

Objective

teerism in the implementation of community goals.

Pursue partnerships that provide greater costeffectiveness and efficiencies

Action Strategies
•

Continue the Village's working relationship
with neighboring jurisdictions to coordinate planning and other Village activities.

•

Engage in regular communications with
neighboring communities and stakeholders

Page49

�Chapter 7:
Future Land Use &amp; Zoning Plan
The Future Land Use Map and district descrip-

long range guide that describes the intended

tions translate the Plan's goals, objectives, and

character of the Village's neighborhoods and

action statements into future land use policy.

districts, and portrays a general land use ar-

Future land use district boundaries and recom-

rangement.

mendations are based on existing land use, environmental conditions, social and economic
characteristics, and community goals and ob-

The map and descriptions included in this chap-

jectives.

ter are intended to ensure that existing land
uses can continue while allowing for wellplanned growth and investment that protects

The map and district descriptions identify de-

and enhances local assets. As such, the Future

sired future land use development patterns

Land Use Map and district descriptions will

and approximate locations for each district.

serve as a guide for the Village, residents, prop-

The map is not intended to be parcel-specific

erty owners, developers, and other stake-

and as such does not reflect the precise

holders when considering new policies, current

boundaries or dimensions of future develop-

issues, land use and zoning decisions, public

ment. Rather, the Future Land Use Map is a

improvements, and community investments.

Page 50

�Future Land Use &amp; Zoning Plan

Future Land Use Designations &amp;

schools, daycares, etc), and do not detract from
the residential character of the neighborhood.

Zoning Plan

Any non-residential uses must limit impacts
such as traffic volumes, lighting, and signage.

Residential 1
Existing Conditions
The Residential 1 category includes a range of

Residential 2

medium- to high-density single family residen-

Existing Conditions

tial areas, most of which is located in or near
the central core of the Village. Most homes are
of traditional nineteenth-century design or single-level mid-20th-century homes. Some nonresidential uses, including small-scale business,
parks, and governmental uses, currently exist in
this district.

The Residential 2 district includes existing single family homes and some undeveloped property to the south of the Village core. Existing
development

consists

of

medium-density

manufactured homes in Eastlake Estates, a
small subdivision.

Future Land Use Intent

Future Land Use Intent
The intent of the Residential 1 district is to preserve the single-family residential character of
existing neighborhoods while offering a range
of housing types, prices, and sizes. New singlefamily residential development should be com-

The intent of this district is to support the continued development of the planned residential
subdivision and allow for additional singlefamily home development in a variety of sizes
and densities.

with historic development patterns,

New development should be consistent with

and should be well-connected to adjacent

the design and architectural styles of existing

neighborhoods, commercial districts, and ser-

Village residential areas, and should be con-

vices via sidewalks, trailways, and streets.

nected to adjacent neighborhoods via streets,

patible

trailways, or sidewalks.
This Plan recognizes that some non-residential
uses in this district provide important services,

Rural Residential

employment, and recreation opportunities to

Existing Conditions

residents. Accessory uses, home occupations,
two-family dwellings, public or community

The Rural Residential district includes much of

uses, and small scale services may be appropri-

the Village's undeveloped areas, as well as

ate if the use supports the needs and functions

some existing low- to medium-density single

of the neighborhood (i.e. parks, churches,

family homes. Existing homes in this district are

Page 51

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

of a variety of architectural styles, and many

commodate existing uses and residential devel-

are on larger lots that are somewhat separated

opment, while providing additional opportuni-

from the Village core. Homes and lots have a

ties for small-scale retail, office, or service uses.

more rural or forested character than residen-

Uses that serve basic shopping or service needs

tial lots within or near the Village core.

for residents and visitors are encouraged.

Future Land Use Intent

New development should include considera-

The intent of this district is to allow for some
additional residential development in a more
rural setting, in a variety of sizes and densities.
Development should be consistent with the
rural and forested character of the area. Development should provide for both vehicular and
non-motorized transportation connections with
other parts of the community. Private roads or
other infrastructure may be necessary to serve

tion of best practices for site design in order to
encourage safe and efficient traffic flow. Parking areas should be designed to minimize impervious surfaces and the amount of roadway
frontage devoted to parking. Parking lots
should be screened and/or located to the side
or rear of buildings, and requirements relative
to the amount of parking should be flexible.
Lighting should be designed so as not to encroach upon neighboring properties. New de-

some areas of the Village.

velopment should be well-connected to other
parts of the Village through streets, sidewalks,
Best practices for site design, including open

or trailways.

space conservation, non-motorized connections or trailways, and environmentally sensitive development patterns, should be considered.

Shoreline
Existing Conditions
As one of the Village's most important assets,
and in consideration of existing environmental

Commercial

conditions, the Manistee Lake shoreline has

Existing Conditions

been designated a special land use category.

The Commercial district includes one existing

The Shoreline district includes a mix of uses

commercial use and surrounding acreage along

along the shoreline, including Penny Park, the

M-55.

Little River Band Natural Resources administration building, and a boat storage/warehouse
building, along with rail, road, and water trans-

Future Land Use Intent

portation access. Significant amounts of wet-

The intent of the Commercial district is to ac-

lands and steep slopes create environmentally

Page 52

�Future Land Use &amp; Zoning Plan

sensitive conditions that may impact development, and some portions of the district have
been identified as brownfield sites.

Public/Recreation
Existing Conditions
The Public/Recreation district includes proper-

Future Land Use Intent

ties that are permanently protected due to

The intent of the Shoreline district is to allow

status as environmentally sensitive areas, rec-

for continued use of the waterfront while pre-

reational uses, or government-owned proper-

serving and enhancing the Village's natural re-

ties, including Village-owned parks, wetlands,

sources and sensitive natural features. Devel-

and the former Village dump.

opment may be permitted in this district, but
because of existing conditions, may be subject
to additional state and federal regulations per-

Future Land Use Intent

taining to sensitive natural features or brown-

The intent of the Public/Recreation district is to

field conditions.

allow for preservation of the Village's natural
areas and to accommodate and enhance rec-

Uses that protect and enhance the Village's

reation opportunities and community facilities.

natural resources and recreational activities,
such as natural areas, trailways, and parks, are

Uses that protect and enhance the Village's

encouraged. Some residential, commercial, or

natural resources and recreational activities,

light industrial development may be appropri-

such as natural areas, trailways, and parks, are

ate, provided that the area's natural resources

encouraged. Any recreation-related develop-

are protected. Any new development should

ment should consider best practices that limit

consider best practices that limit negative im-

negative impacts to the natural environment,

pacts to the natural environment, such as natu-

such as natural landscaping, shielded lighting,

ral landscaping, shielded lighting, use of native

use of native vegetation, and low impact or

vegetation, and low impact or environmentally

environmentally sensitive development tech-

sensitive development techniques. Any indus-

niques.

trial or commercial development should be low
-intensity, with low emissions, noise levels, and
limited impacts to adjacent uses or natural resources. New development should be compatible with surrounding neighborhoods and wellconnected to other parts of the Village through
streets, sidewalks, or tra ilways.

Page 53

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

Draft Future
Land Use Map

""-" State Trunklines
~

Other Roads

~

Railroad

l akes &amp; Ponds
,.rv-• -

Rivers &amp; Creeks

Fu1ure Land Use
(

\

. . Corrmercial
. . PubficJRecreati onal
Residential
Residential 2
. . Rural Residential
. . Shoreline

Page 54

�Chapter 8:
Plan Implementation
an appropriate mix of uses is permitted.

Zoning Plan
Zoning has traditionally been the primary

•

Special or conditional use provisions, to

means of implementation for most master

allow for higher-intensity uses, such as in-

plans. Further, the Michigan Planning Enabling

dustry, while ensuring that impacts to sur-

Act (PA 33 of 2008) requires the Master Plan to

rounding neighborhoods are minimal.

include a zoning plan, showing how land use
categories on the future land use map relate to

•

Site plan review language insures that development is in compliance with the zoning

the zoning map. The Future Land Use Map and

ordinance and other requirements, and

district descriptions act as the Village of East-

provides a review mechanism that ensure

lake Zoning Plan. The proposed land uses illus-

that new development is well-designed

trated on the future land use plan map are a
guide and not intended to indicate the precise

with minimal negative impacts to sur-

boundary between uses. These uses could vary

rounding neighborhoods.

depending on how a specific proposal relates

•

Lighting standards can limit impacts of

to existing uses, environmental conditions, and

lighting to adjacent properties while pro-

to the plan.

viding energy savings and reducing sky
glow (light pollution).

Many goals and objectives in the Master Plan

•

Private street or road standards regulate

can be addressed through administration and

private road design, with engineering speci-

implementation of, or changes to, the Village

fications and guidance for continued main-

Zoning Ordinance. Because the Village has not

tenance. Private roads can provide access

completed a comprehensive update of the zon-

to larger undeveloped properties, thereby

ing ordinance in some time, it may be neces-

offering additional development opportuni-

sary in many cases to amend the zoning ordi-

ties

nance or map in order to accommodate the
desired intent of the future land use map. The

•

Access management is a best practice that
guides the placement of driveways and

Village should thoroughly review and update

traffic circulation, in order to ensure safe

existing zoning regulations in order to ensure

and efficient traffic flow.

that they are consistent with the adopted
Master Plan. In particular, some zoning policies

•

signed to allow for flexibility in parking in

the Village may wish to review, update, or de-

order to reduce impervious surfaces.

velop include:

•

Parking standards should be carefully de-

Zoning district classifications, boundaries,

•

and uses, should be updated to ensure that

Planned unit development regulations allow options and flexibility for large or
mixed-use developments, while accom-

Page 55

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

plishing a number of community goals or

dresses expenditures for facilities, mainte-

objectives.

nance, staffing, and other administrative functions.

Rezoning and Conditional Rezoning
In many cases, current zoning allows for the
use of properties in a way that is consistent
with the intent of the Future Land Use Map.
However, in some cases, rezonings may be
needed to allow for the intended uses or development types of the Future Land Use Map.

To aid in the budgeting process, the Village
should consider a capital improvements plan
{CIP) that provides a blueprint for capital expenditures such as roads, utility improvements,
parks, and heavy equipment. The CIP would
help maximize tax revenues, encourage efficient administration, and aid in grant applications.

Conditional zoning is a technique permitted in
Michigan which allows a property owner to
voluntarily attach conditions to a rezoning re-

Leadership and Public Input

quest. These conditions restrict the develop-

The Master Plan is implemented in part by de-

ment of the property to that scenario proposed

cisions that are made by Village leadership on

by the applicant, and

must be offered by the

issues including zoning, budgets, policy, and

applicant-not imposed by the local govern-

capital improvements. Village leadership in-

ment. This technique may be useful in circum-

cludes the Village Council, Planning Commis-

stances where possible impacts to adjacent

sion, Zoning Board of Appeals, and appointed

uses are a concern.

staff. Each group plays a different role in the
implementation of the Master Plan.
Village Council

Capital Improvements, Grants, &amp;

The Village Council is elected every four years

Spending

to represent the community. Responsibilities

While many Village planning goals will be implemented through zoning or other policies,

include:
•

Appointing the Planning Commission

expenditures. Because some expenses or im-

•

Adopting plans and ordinances

provements may be eligible for grant funding,

•

Setting tax rates

•

Authorizing expenditures and borrowing

spending needs will be addressed in the Village

•

Hiring administrative staff

budget, which is adopted annually and ad-

•

Providing oversight of public facilities

some projects or objectives will require local

the Village should pursue grant opportunities
as

appropriate.

Other,

non-grant

funded

Page 56

�Plan Implementation

•

Actively enforce the zoning ordinance and

•

ing regulations

related Village Ordinance
•

Acting on requests for variances from zon-

Other duties as necessary.

•

Acting on requests for interpretation of
zoning regulations

Village Planning Commission
The Village Planning Commission is appointed
by the Village Council and is charged with:
•

Development of plans and zoning ordionances

Zoning Administrator
The Zoning Administrator is a staff or volunteer
position appointed by the Village Council. Re-

•

Administration of the Zoning Ordinance

•

Advising the Village Council on proposed
rezonings or zoning ordinance changes

sponsibilities include:
•

Review and investigate applications to ensure compliance with zoning ordinance

•

Review of development proposals

•

Regular review (at least once every 5
years), and, if necessary, update of the Village Master Plan

•

Issue zoning permits, when appropriate

•

Investigate alleged zoning violations

•

Conduct site plan reviews and prepare staff
reports on zoning applications

Zoning Board of Appeals
The Zoning Board of Appeals is appointed by

Elected and appointed leadership, as well as

the Village Council and is responsible for:

any paid or volunteer staff, should attend regu-

•

Hears appeals on zoning decisions

lar training sessions on planning and zoning

Page 57

�Eastlake Village Master Plan

While many of the plan's objectives may be
addressed through Village policies, ordinances,
or other regulations, many of the goals and
objectives will require strong partnerships with
community stakeholders.

The plan recommends pursuing partnerships
with local service clubs, schools, nonprofits,
regional agencies, and other levels of government. Partnerships broaden the scope of available grant dollars and other revenue, encourage citizen engagement in community activities, and enhance staff capacities and efficiencies. Possible partners may include:
•

Manistee County

•

Little River Band of Ottawa Indians

•

Manistee Township, City of Manistee, and
other neighboring units of government

•

Local service groups

•

Student groups

•

Alliance for Economic Success

•

Northwest Michigan Council of Govern-

fundamentals, best practices, and emerging
and innovative approaches to community development.

To ensure that the Village is responsive to
community and development needs while protecting the public health, safety, and welfare,
the Village Council, Planning Commission, and
staff should engage in regular, open communication with the community. Regular focus
groups, public discussions, or other forum type

ments
•

Michigan Department of Natural Resources

•

Michigan State Housing Development Authority

•

Michigan Department of Transportation

•

Michigan Economic Development Corpora-

opportunities should be considered as a means
to continuously obtain input and feedback.

Partnerships and Citizen Engagement

tion

Partnerships with some of these organizations

Page 58

�Plan Implementation

may provide volunteer capital to implement

The Recreation Plan, which is included in this

some small-scale community projects. Volun-

Master Plan, should be reviewed and updated

teer activities will be critical to building citizen

every five years, to ensure that goals are rele-

engagement and community pride.

vant and objectives are being addressed.

Joint planning with neighboring units of government may also offer some important opportunities for efficiency in planning and administration. Joint planning activities could include
shared master plans or recreation plans, shared
planning or zoning staff, or planning for issues
of intergovernmental concern, such as water
quality or watershed plans.

Plan Updates
The Michigan Planning Enabling Act requires
that all plans be reviewed, and updated if necessary, every 5 years. While comprehensive
updates may not occur as often as every 5
years, regular review of the plan and its objectives will be important to ensure that the plan
and related ordinances are effective, whether
the goals and objectives are being addressed,
whether the plan's policies are still relevant
and appropriate, and which objectives remain
to be addressed.

During the plan review, several objectives
should be identified and prioritized as an implementation schedule, in order to help focus
the Planning Commission's activity throughout
the year.

Page 59

�Eastlake Village Master Plan Public Input: Executive Summary
In 2011, the Village of Eastlake began efforts to develop a Village Master Plan and Recreation Plan. The purpose of the
Village Master Plan is to provide guidance for land use, zoning decisions, and other community policy; while the
Recreation Plan is intended to provide a five-year action plan for recreation improvements and enhancements. As part of
this effort, the Eastlake Village Master Plan Committee has worked to obtain public input as a foundation for the plans.
Two public forums were held on March 3, 2011, with participation from about 30 residents total. In addition, a survey was
mailed to all addresses within the Village and to out-of-town property owners in February 2011. Following is a summary of
consistent themes that emerged from community discussions and survey results.

Village Character and Quality of Life
Comments at the March 3 forum reflect the desire to maintain Eastlake's small town atmosphere and sense of community,
which are highly valued by Village residents. However, there was some discussion regarding a decline in attendance or
participation in community or social events. Participants also discussed concerns relative to junk or blight, and how these
issues contribute to a negative image.
These sentiments were reflected in the Village survey, which indicated that relatively low numbers of respondents feel that
the social environment (25%) and overall Village appearance (38%) are "good" or "excellent. 92% of respondents would
like the Village to remain primarily residential. Survey results also stressed the interest on the part of respondents
regarding enforcement of junk or nuisance ordinances, with only 18% indicating that they are satisfied with current
enforcement activities, and 77% answering that these activities are somewhat or very important. 86% would support
enforcement initiatives in the future. This issue was also addressed in several written comments in the survey

Recreation &amp; Natural Resources
Recreation and natural resources were identified as important community assets at the forum. Recreation discussions at
the forum focused on potential improvements to Penny Park, which attracts the most usage of the three Village parks.
Improvements to Penny Park - including restroom improvements, dredging of the canal, and accessibility improvements
for boating and fishing - attracted more support than other identified recreation improvements. Other recreation
discussion and comments included trail linkages to public forest land; providing for pedestrian accessibility to Penny Park,
such as the development of a stairway to the water; and improvements or enhancements to Johnson Field.

Community Facilities and Services
Surveys addressed current levels of satisfaction and importance levels for Village facilities and services. Maintenance
activities - particularly winter maintenance - were identified as the most important, and several comments in the surveys
addressed this issue, along with the potential for partnership with other communities on some issues. Discussion at the
forum included comments such as addressing access to the leaf dump, partnership opportunities, improvements to the
Village hall, fire department building upgrade, and addressing maintenance costs. Apart from historic preservation efforts
(i.e. Village Hall), support in the survey for these items appeared to be split, with support for these initiatives at around
50% and significant amounts of neutral responses. These issues appear to be areas that will require careful consideration
and discussion in the future.

Land Use
Responses regarding satisfaction with the community's current mix of land uses were nearly evenly divided between
negative, positive, and neutral, but most participants in both the survey (92%) and at the March 3 forum would like to see
the Village retain its primarily residential character. However, there is an interest in some small scale commercial. There
was discussion and interest at the forum regarding a "neighborhood store" that would serve residents' basic shopping
needs. While general survey results don't show substantial support (38%) for general commercial development, that
support grows to 59% when specific commercial uses are identified - i.e. neighborhood commercial (small retail, services,
offices). Similar results are apparent when respondents are asked about highway commercial (gas stations, retail, dining,
etc), which had 54% support in the survey. This holds true for light industrial as well, which had 51% support when
specifically identified, compared to very low levels of support for general industrial development. Based on input, it seems
that there is interest in commercial or industrial development but at a small scale that serves residents needs.

1

�March 3 Eastlake Village Master Plan Public Forum
Public Input Summary
Two Eastlake Village Master Plan Public Forums were held on March 3 at the Village Hall; about 30 people
participated (total). After presentations on Village planning history, demographics, and plan basics, participants
worked in small groups to discuss the following questions:
•
•

What are the Village's most important qualities and assets? What are strengths and weaknesses? Why?
What are your hopes and priorities for the future of the Village? What's your vision?

Some themes were apparent, based on wrap-up discussions at the forum and on notes from facilitators. The
Village's high quality of life and quiet, friendly, safe, small town atmosphere; and parks, open spaces, and
recreation emerged as the most important Village assets. Natural resources, including lake frontage, proximity to
the Manistee River, and national forest were also cited frequently as Village assets, particularly in relationship to
recreation opportunities.
Concerns focused on the local economy and Village aesthetics, along with some issues relative to usage or
amenities at Village parks. "Main ideas" or themes relative to community vision were as follows,:
•
•
•

Maintain the Village's residential character and small town feel, while improving or enhancing the sense
of community
Maintain and improve the Village parks and recreation opportunities
Allow for/encourage some small-scale, low-impact commercial uses that meet needs of residents and
visitors

Focal points from the discussion included the Village character or image and quality of life; recreation and natural
resources; community facilities and services; and land use. Following are summaries of assets, challenges and
visions for each of these focus areas.

Village Character and Quality of Life
Assets: The residential character and quiet, friendly, safe, small town atmosphere were seen as the Village's biggest
asset. There was discussion regarding the family friendly environment and sense of community and safety - i.e. knowing
your neighbors and neighbors looking out for each other. The Village's historic character and Bullfrog Alley, proximity to
Manistee (city assets without city), walkability, and affordable living opportunities were also considered important
attributes.
Challenges: Junk and maintenance issues create a negative image. There is a lack of services or basic businesses for
residents - i.e. bank, grocery, gas station - and for visitors, primarily lodging. Community events that have been held in
the past have been "losr - there is a lack of participation and momentum to organize events, and an overall lack of
engagement from residents in Village activities. There was some discussion regarding lack of enforcement on some
Village issues, such as traffic speeds on Village streets.
Vision:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Save trees on Bullfrog or replace if necessary.
Need a greater sense of place to counteract negative image
Better upkeep - maintain or improve image
Maintain residential character
Keep the Village the same as it is but with better efficiency
Landscaping/planting with native plants
Beautification - flowers, trees, etc
Keep separate from Manistee
Celebrate heritage
Market and advertise assets
Keep walkable, safe and quiet

1

�•
•
•
•

Organize more community events - community yard sales, picnics, art fairs, softball, etc.
Restore sense of community
Attract more young families
Need more jobs to attract new residents

Recreation &amp; Natural Resources
Assets. Penny Park campground and fishing access are important to the community. Thousands of acres of national
forest and the world class Manistee River are nearby.
Challenges: There is a lack of swimming opportunities or access for pedestrians to the water. Johnson Field is not well
maintained. The Village is not connected via trails to the surrounding forest. Sand deposits from Manistee River and
impacts to water flow in the lake from the Milwaukee boat affect fishing opportunities.
Vision:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Open up water way to Penny Park
Build stairway from ball field to Penny Park.
Basic recreation improvements
Upgrades at Johnson Field - lighting, dugouts, parking
Fishing dock - floating docks?
Dredging
Fishing/picnic/water access
Maintain trails
Penny Park improvements - landscaping, dredging, swimming opportunities, increased infrastructure i.e.
handicap accessibility and showers.
Swimming area possibilities
Work with DNR
Provide snowmobile/ORV trail for access to natural areas. Parking lot and trail into state land on 6th street and N
street. Regulate snowmobile use.
Provide trail linkages to national forest
Maximize Manistee Lake and River connectiosn to the Village
Improve land and water quality
Better park maintenance
Focus on parks/roads/playgrounds
Festivals or events to celebrate heritage/history
Dredging could improve fishing access

Community Facilities and Services
Assets: Village leadership is invested in the community as residents. Not a lot of rules/regulations provides for flexibility.
Quality fire department/EMT. Village owns 80 acres of undeveloped land.
Challenges Low revenues create difficulties meeting needs. Ordinance enforcement, maintenance costs, and employee
management were cited as concerns, as were natural gas/infrastructure expenses for residents.
Vision:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Potential for sale or development of Village-owned land.
Use prison or jail workers for community service
Provide improvements to Village hall - preserve historic character
Preserve Bullfrog Alley
Address access to leaf dump.
Management of government employees
Become a charter city
Potential partnership opportunities with tribe
Make safer routes to bus stops
Fire department upgrade - own building
Renewable/alternative energy sources for local sustainability

2

�Land Use
Assets. The Village's primarily residential character is seen as an asset. Large lots allows for space between homes and
privacy.
·
Challenges. No commercial uses means that residents have to drive to Manistee for basic needs. Mobile home park may
impact new residential development.
Vision:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Condos
Restaurant
Light industry - home business, live/work
Mini-mart on M-55
Keep the buffer between the industrial park and the Village
Small-scale commercial uses
Potential for nearby commercial development
Keep residential atmosphere
Residential and commercial growth could increase revenue
Small light quiet commerce/industry
Small grocery, gas station, bait store, mom and pop store - something both residents and visitors could use
More housing
Opportunities for vacant land - housing developments?

3

�Village of Eastlake
2011 Master Plan Survey
The Village of Eastlake released a Master Plan survey in February 2011, as part of the Village's master plan and recreation plan development efforts, in order to
better understand the community's preferences for the Village. A total of 335 surveys were mailed the week of February 21 to all addresses in the Village of
Eastlake, as well as to property owners that do not reside in the Village; surveys were also made available online. Recipients were asked to return their surveys
by March 18. 63 surveys were returned. Using the mailing total for a base, this would equal a response rate of about 19%.

Age of Survey Respondents

Based on answers provided in Part 4 of the survey, which asked for basic demographic information, most
survey respondents are Village residents (86%), and an even higher percentage were property owners (95%).
Most were age 45 or older (77%), and 36% were age 65 or older. Only 2 respondents were younger than 25.
The age of remaining participants was fairly evenly in terms of percentage.
This report summarizes survey results, with a focus on the strongest positive/negative responses overall and
for each survey section, in order to determine areas of community priority and consensus.

Agreement Areas
Several issues in the survey attracted a significant level of positive responses. Survey questions that received
over 80% positive responses are considered "agreement areas" as they have strong community support.
Planning, zoning, or operational issues that the community faces now or in the future should take these areas
into consideration, as they appear to be important to the community and will assist Village leaders in setting
current priorities and will provide a direction for the future. Strong negative responses, on the other hand,
clearly identify which current conditions and future directions are not acceptable to most residents.

Respondents clearly indicated their interest in retaining the residential character that they think the Village already has, and indicated which Village activities
should take priority - i.e. maintenance, improvement of fishing access, and efforts to address the Village quality of life and overall appearance of the community.

Areas of divided opinion are reflected in response rates that are fairly evenly divided between positive, negative, and neutral responses. These "toss up" questions
can signal the need for careful analysis or community discussion surrounding these issue areas.

1

�The responses below Include questions which received a total positive response (includes somewhat important and very important, somewhat agree and strongly
agree, somewhat satisfied and very satisfied, and yes responses) of 80% or more. Strong negative responses include a total negative response ("not very
unimportanf' and "very unimportant," somewhat disagree and strongly disagree, somewhat dissatisfied and very dissatisfied, needs improvement and poor, and no
responses) of 60% or more. Toss up questions are identified in commentary on each relevant section.
Agreement Areas - Strong Positive Responses:
• A total of 92% answered that they would like to see the VIiiage remain a primarily residential community (57% strongly agree, 35% agree somewhat).
• 92% consider Village maintenance to be important. 79% indicated that winter maintenance activities are "very important." An additional 13% considered
winter maintenance to be "somewhat" important (total 92% positive responses). 48% felt that summer maintenance activities are "very important," and an
additional 44% answered that this activity is "somewhat important" (total 92% positive responses)\
• 92% would support private foundation grants or donations
•
91 % indicated that It's important for fishing access to be developed/enhanced In the Village
• 90% would support grants for recreation funding.
• 89% feel it's important for the Village to address the overall quality of life.
• 88% feel it's important for the Village to address overall VIiiage appearance, and 86% think it's important to address Village services and facilities.
• 86% answered that it's important to develop or enhance Village boating access.
Agreement Areas - High Level of Negative Responses:
• 84% do not use Johnson Field
• 78% would not support heavy industrial development in the Village
• 71 % do not use the nature walk
• 67% would not like to see more Industrial growth in the Village
• 61% expressed dissatisfaction with ordinance enforcement (34% were "very dissatisfied" and 27% were "somewhat dissatisfied")

2

�Part 1. Current Village Services, Facilities, and Qualities
Questions in Part 1 of the survey asked participants to indicate the level of satisfaction with current services and identify areas that should be considered current
priorities. Three questions were asked relative to satisfaction, importance, and quality of current facilities or aspects of the Village. Seven specific services,
facilities, or Village aspects were identified for each question. In general, levels of satisfaction or perceptions of current quality were somewhat lower than the
levels of importance assigned to the features listed.

HowsatisfiedareyauwillllhefalkMingamnWlagesavices•faa'ilies?
[::J) ~ot sure/not applicable
Ver)' Satisfied D
c::J Very Dissatisfied
Sulmewhat Satisfied
D Somewhiat Dissatisfied

80 %

410%

20%

0%
·Gerieral wirnter
main,tenarjce
activ ~'ies (plowing,

General
s prirngl':s um mer.Ifall

Recre.it ion
mairr.tern;moe

Leaf d111m pf pick up
serv ices

-Ordinarnoe
ernf,c,rcement

m-.iinternanoe

etc)

3

6

Question 1. How satisfied are you with the
following current VIiiage services or
facilities? Responses in Question 1 indicated
fairly positive views of most current Village
services or facilities. Winter and summer
maintenance activities received the highest
number of positive responses, with 64% and
66% of respondents selecting positive
responses on these questions, respectively.
Ordinance enforcement was not viewed
positively: only 18% expressed satisfaction with
current ordinance enforcement activities, and
61% of respondents indicated that they are very
dissatisfied or somewhat dissatisfied with these
efforts. Other activities - including recreation
maintenance, the Village hall, and leaf
dump/pick-up services were more evenly
divided, reflecting a "toss up" or split community
opinion. Significant numbers of respondents
selected "not sure/not applicable" for these
questions (over 20% for each question).

�How importmd are lhei:AMing Wlage services 4)1 a:iliies to you?

c::J Ver,i Unimportant

q

Not s urelnot applicable

, Somewhat Important

Very Important

N10t very Important

80 %
1

60%

40%

20%

mairutemsnoe

nra.i nten;;noe

Zoning
ordinance

up ser11 ices

a,c,~i11ities
(plowing, ero)

cll.inges

Question 2. How important are the following
Village services or facilities to you? Despite

varying levels of satisfaction with the services or
facilities identified in Question 2, there is fairly
clear consensus that all current activities are
important to Village residents, with positive
responses ranging from 64% to 92% for each
question. Maintenance activities were by far
considered the most important Village service,
with 92% of respondents selecting "somewhat' or
"very" important for both questions. 79% of
respondents indicated that winter maintenance
activities are "very" important - the highest level
of strong agreement (i.e., "very important,"
"strongly agree," etc.} for any question in the
survey. While the majority has expressed
general satisfaction with this service, there is
somewhat of a disconnect here with how
important respondents believe this activity to be
(92% }, compared with how satisfied they are with
current services (64%}. Several comments in
Part 5 discussed maintenance issues.
Other priority services or facilities, indicated by
strong levels of support, are ordinance
enforcement and leaf dump/pick up services.
Ordinance enforcement had a high percentage
of positive responses (77%} in terms of its
importance. As with maintenance activities, there
is a disconnect with the level of importance
assigned to the activity and the current level of
satisfaction with this activity (18%}.
Respondents also consider the Village hall and
zoning changes to be important, with 74% and
75% positive responses, respectively.

4

�Please rate the curreatqllillity mlhefallawing aspects

[:=J Poor

«the lJiillage.

l:::J Needs Improvement C::i Neutral

Exoellent

Question 3. Please rate the current quality of
the following aspects of the Village. In respect
to the current quality of various aspects of the
Village, responses reflect some "toss up" areas
and relatively low levels of positive responses.
The highest positive response was relative to the
overall quality of life (65%), followed by natural
environment (55%). Positive ratings for the
community's social environment and economy
were low, both under 30%. There were significant
percentages of neutral responses (30% or
greater) in this section for questions including the
mix of land uses, social environment, and
economy.

80 %

60%

40%

20 %

0%
n,crcoatic,n
opportunities

Mix of 13ml
1.1ses! deve!opme
r.t opportuniti!!!

Socisl
env iror.m ent

env ironment
(i.e .• •comn:11111it1
ac:tiv ities , s,oci:il
e.-ent: ,
nei9nborhooi!I

appearanee

identity}

5

�Part 2. Planning for the Future
Questions in Part 2 were asked to will help the Village determine priorities for land use planning and Village services in the future. Four questions were asked in
this section relative to potential future initiatives, how the Village should grow or change in the future, what types of development respondents would support, and
how important it is for the Village to address certain issues. Responses generally reflect importance, quality, and satisfaction levels identified in Part 1.

Would you ■UIJllllll--illcllling iiniiaiiwes?

0

No

Not Sure

Cl Yes
Question 4. Would you support the following
Initiatives? Participants were asked to select
yes/not sure/no responses for a variety of community
activities. The highest rated initiatives were
enforcement of junk, blight, and nuisance
ordinances, as might be expected from the high level
of importance assigned to this activity in Question 2.
Historic preservation activities also attracted
significant support. Outside of these two initiatives,
there were significant numbers of neutral responses.
Partnership with other communities and Village hall
improvements both received support from just over
half of respondents. The lowest-rated activities were
additional Village maintenance staff and Village pickup of leaf and yard waste at taxpayer expense.

Enforcement Regular hours Vi113;e pickR0Utin11
Historic
of j11nk. bTigl!,t , of operati11n up of leaf and
voluntt:er
preservati:m
or nuisance
for leaf dump yard waste at access to 'lesf efforts - i.e..
ordinl!lm:ies
(operated by
taxpayer
dump
Vill=l!Je Hall,
volunteers}
expense
v1iUow trees

Additiolllll
Villa11e
m-lliinteruinee

staff

Pmne!SJlip lmprovemants
with ott.er
to !he \filla; e
communit~
Hall
for prwis io11
of ! omeser.. .

6

�Howwouldyoulike theVillagelugrowgc:IBlgBOV111"lml'IBllt20,-s? Plmaeiiniicam....._yauagreeg
dis;vmwillllmilllcMinJ,sta..,. ..

q

Stro"9ly Oi.sagr,ee
Disagree s,omewhat

I W&lt;illllllil lilce to see
t'he V ill!lgie ,re ma im
a p ri rm arily
residltrrtial «:,&gt;mm . ..

O

No opioo

,Agree Somewhat

mo11e oom merc ial
growt h in the

I WCli!ld ,lik:e to s~
more in:lll!t&gt;ri!!I
gro\'lth in the

I would Jike to see
t h&gt;e resj denti31
populn ion of the

V,illa;a.

V illage.

Vill!l;e 1increme.

I wo 1:1ld lik:e to s ee

Strongly Agree

I wo lill::! like to see I wo 111ltl like to s ee
t llie res idential
t~ res.illli!:ntial
p0p11l:.t iom of the
popul!!tion of t he
V illage decrease. \llillB;e Stary l!m, ·s ...

7

Question 5. How would you like the VIiiage to
grow or change over the next 20 years? There
was clear consensus in support of the Village
remaining a primarily residential community - 92%
indicated agreement with that statement. Support
for other changes was not consistent, with positive
responses ranging from 3% to 49% . There was
fairly strong consensus against industrial growth,
with 67% of respondents disagreeing with the
statement that they would like to see more
industrial development. Slightly fewer respondents
supported additional commercial development
(38%) than those that disagreed that there should
be more of this type of development (44%).

While respondents were clear that the Village
should retain its residential character, there was
not a clear direction in terms of whether that
residential population should increase or stay the
same. While there was fairly strong agreement
against a population decline, with only 3%
indicating support for a population decrease and
57% opposed, opinions on whether the population
should increase or stay the same were split, with
less than 50% support for both questions.

�What types of additional w IIIM'deftlapment-..dd JaJSlftlllll in the VilageclEml ale?

r::::J No

Nel!Jlrborhood
commercial
(s.m i ll retail,

sel'Vlic:es.
offit&gt;es)

No opinion

Highway
litlht ind11s11y
He.ivy
comm·ercial (i.e. high te::h
industry
(gas stations. electronics,
(energy
retail, di ing,
00mp11terproduction,
etc}
rel;;tell
m-,mufacturiri,;
m;;nufacturi .. .

)

r::::J Yes

Hotels ,
motels , inns,
bed and
bre,1kfast
facil~ies

Sin!Jle-family
resi z!lenti31

Multi-family
resillent il!'I

deve lopment

deve lopm-ent
(apsrtments,

oomlos,
townhouses}

8

Other rple;,se specify

Question 6. What types of additional or new
development would you support In the VIiiage of
Eastlake? As might be expected from responses to
Question 5, the greatest support for additional
development was for single family residential, with
63% answering that they would support additional
single family homes.

Despite fairly low levels of support for additional
commercial development in Question 5, there was
nearly as much support for neighborhood and
highway commercial development in Question 6
(59% and 54%, respectively) as there was for
additional single family homes. The higher levels of
support likely occur due to the level of specificity in
the question: residents may support additional
commercial or industrial development, but only if it
allows the Village to retain its residential character.
This can be observed in responses to questions on
industrial questions as well. Despite strong
disagreement with general industrial growth in
Question 5, just over half of respondents would
support light industry. Heavy industry, however which typically involves more impacts to the
surrounding community - was viewed negatively,
with 78% indicating they would not support this type
of development.
Other development options listed in Question 6 multi-family residential and hotels/motels - were not
widely supported by respondents.

�In your opinion. how impadanl is itfurlhe Village ID adlhss lhe iJlcMmg aspects alhe CXllfflllnly?
c::J Very Important
r:;:::;:J No ,opinion
_ :Somewhat Important
Ver/ Important
- ·Some,uhatlmportant

80 %

60 %

20%

0%
Parlts and
recreation
,c:,pponu ities

Ill ix of lallll
uses/develop
ment
opponimities

Nat11ral
enviror,m er,t

Social
EconomyJjob
environment oppon111nities
(i. e..
oomm1mity
-3Ctil•ities.
socil!I ever.ts.
neighborhood
identity)

9

Question 7. In your opinion, how important
is it for the Village to address the following
aspects of the community? Participants
were asked to indicate whether it was
important for the Village to address a variety of
community issues, some of which were listed
in Part 1, Question 3, which asked
respondents to rate the current quality of
various aspects of the Village. The majority of
the responses for Question 7 indicated that it
is important for the Village to address those
aspects. There was substantial consensus in
particular regarding the importance of Village
efforts to address the overall quality of life,
overall Village appearance, Village services
and facilities (89%, 88%, and 86% positive
responses, respectively). Support for efforts to
address the natural environment and parks
and recreation was also high (79% and 76%,
respectively). These high levels of support
reflect the importance assigned to these
features and current levels of satisfaction
identified in Part 1. Lower levels of support or
split responses were found for "social
environment" and "economy/job opportunities"
which haven't traditionally been considered
the purview of local government.

�Part 3. Parks and Recreation
Part 3 asked 5 questions to help the Village determine current and future priorities for Village parks and recreation. Questions addressed usage rates, satisfaction
levels, and potential improvements to existing parks, and also asked what types of improvements or developments are important and would be supported by
respondents.

I~

100

HawaalialiedJUU_lllilll._......, .....,
Very dissatisfied
l:;;;::l No opinion . . . Somewhat Satisfied
- ~ Somewhat Oisslitisfied

H-aftendoym_ . . .,..... .....,
Never
Rarely c:i Sometimes Often

%
---------··
'

-

.....

100 %

:

,

'

!

'.~ ' ~J

11

I

.

80%

I

,' . ' ,.

60 %

. ... -,

.,. ~' ... ,. ~

~

.

llljlfl,Ver, Satisfied

I

&gt;

24

~--- .. ·- --· ..~· -- ___J
40%

40%

47

20%

21
0%

Johnson Fiold {blll&lt;a!b•Uoawt. b&gt;slll»U

N~lure w,alk

Penny Park:

di!lftorn:I. pl&gt;yground equiplftent)

Question 8. How often do you use the following parks?
Johnson Field and the nature walk are rarely used by survey
respondents. Penny Park is used most often, with about 55%
of respondents indicating that they "sometimes" or "often"
use that park.

JMM-Oft Field (lwketb&gt;ll ... ~. bneboll
dillfflon&lt;I, piay1jround equipment)

N.111.1r.t wa·lk

Question 9. How satisfied are you with the following
parks? Responses in question 9 included significant
numbers of neutral answers for Johnson Field and the nature walk, reflecting the low levels of usage indicated in Question
8. Penny Park, the most frequently used Village park, had
58% positive responses.

10

�In your opinion. how important is le . . . . .llartd&amp;ICEIIBIIJhtalkMing types ar 1ec.eaia.1it, Easlae?
y
Very Unimportant
Q
No Opinion
Somewhat Important
. ,1Very Important
Somewnat Unimportant

Untversal
Atll1etic
.accessibility fields/tennis
features {i.e.
oouits
r,:;imps,
paved sid,,.

Fishing

Boating

access

access.

Hit ir,g!s·kiing
trails

Swimming

Snowmobile/ Snowmobile/ P,13ygrllunm
ORV trails ORV use of equipment
Vill,,ge
streets

11

Question 1O. In your opinion, how important
is the development or enhancement of the
following types of recreation in Eastlake? As
might be expected from the higher usage rates
indicated for Penny Park, fishing access and
boating access were considered to be important
by a clear majority of respondents (91 % and 86%
respectively). Support for improving or enhancing
other types of recreation was more lukewarm,
with responses ranging from 46% to 68% support
for activities such as universal accessibility
features, athletic courts, and playground
equipment. Snowmobile/ORV usage of streets
and trails had a nearly equal amounts of positive
and negative responses, showing some level of
divided opinion over these activities.

�Would you suppadlaefalCMing ~ lo Village .-b?
Not s ure c;:::J Yes
Other improvements -please
c:;J No

Question 11. Would you support the
following improvements to Village
parks? Improvements to boating, camping,
and fishing at Penny Park had the greatest
amount of positive responses, with 78%
answering that they would support these
activities. The high level of support for
Penny Park improvements - including 70%
support for dredging the canal for dock
installation and 63% support for restroom
improvements - reflects the greater usage
rates at this park along with the high level of
importance assigned to fishing and boating
access.

specify in Part5, Additional
Comments
100 %-r-------,,:-----.--- - ---.---,,- - - - - ,

80%

58

40%

0%
Install fJcating dock
for I~111ii~
accessibility at
:Penny Park

Overall
Dredge can31for
improvements to
dock install:ticn at
accessibttity for
Penny Park
b03,tirn9, c3mpir\g,
fishi"'IJ at Penny P...

Restroom
improvemeJ!IIS at
Penny Park

Exp11ns ion cf the

Improvements to

mm1re trail

play,; rournd
e :i111ipm1:nt

12

�Wouldyousupportusingthefalolllingtypes d b d n g f a r ~ '-WlaaelBlm md1a.ealion?
[:=J No

Not Sure

c;J Yes

Other- pleasespecify in
Part5, Additl onal Comments

1,00 %- . - - - - - - - ,

19

60%

90

92

40% -

Grants

Village general fund

M illa3i!

Pri~ate foundaticin grants or

donations

13

Question 12. Would you support using the
following types of funding for Improvements
to VIiiage parks and recreation? Most
respondents would support using grants or
donations for recreation improvements, while a
slight majority (56%) would oppose the use of a
millage. Support for the use of the Village general
fund for recreation improvements was split.

�Part 4. Demographic Information.
As noted, the survey asked general demographic questions relative to age, residency, and property ownership. Questions were also asked regarding
computer/Internet access and whether respondents would access Village ordinances or other information online. 70% answered that they do have Internet
access, and of those, 76% would access Village information online if it was available.

Part 5. General Comments
Over half of the participants provided additional comments (35). 17 provided names and/or contact information. Comments relative to the master plan or
recreation plan processes addressed issues including:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•

Mobile homes
Fundraising
Recreation opportunities
Ordinance enforcement
Convenience store
Junk cars/general junk and maintenance issues
Village hall
High speed internet
A number of comments addressed specific recreation improvements, including:
o Dredge Penny Park canal
o Install a "Bell Park"
o Skating rink
o Reduced camping rates for Village residents
o Cut recreation
o Improve area west of Johnson Field with bench and handicap access
o Clear out woods for junior area at Johnson field
o Develop bayou into marina
o Pier heads and breakwaters to provide a harbor entry into the bayou
o Nature walk needs maintenance and better signage

There were also a number of comments relative to community service issues. About 9 comments were related to fire department issues, and about 8 comments
addressed issues with Village maintenance - plowing in particular.
•
Penny Park waste issues
• SEV
•
Enforcement of speed limits and dog leash laws
• Access to jobs
•
Leaf dump access
• Snowmobile ordinance/enforcement of speed limits

14

�15

�</text>
                  </elementText>
                </elementTextContainer>
              </element>
            </elementContainer>
          </elementSet>
        </elementSetContainer>
      </file>
    </fileContainer>
    <collection collectionId="62">
      <elementSetContainer>
        <elementSet elementSetId="1">
          <name>Dublin Core</name>
          <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
          <elementContainer>
            <element elementId="50">
              <name>Title</name>
              <description>A name given to the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998780">
                  <text>Wyckoff Planning and Zoning Collection</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="39">
              <name>Creator</name>
              <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998781">
                  <text>Planning &amp; Zoning Center (Lansing, Mich.) (Organization)</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998782">
                  <text>Wyckoff, Mark A.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="41">
              <name>Description</name>
              <description>An account of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998783">
                  <text>Municipal master plans and zoning ordinances from across the state of Michigan, spanning from the 1960s to the early 2020s. The bulk of the collection was compiled by urban planner Mark Wyckoff over the course of his career as the founder and principal planner of the Planning and Zoning Center in Lansing, Michigan. Some additions have been made to the collection by municipalities since it was transferred to Grand Valley State University.</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="38">
              <name>Coverage</name>
              <description>The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998784">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="40">
              <name>Date</name>
              <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998785">
                  <text>1960/2023</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="48">
              <name>Source</name>
              <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998786">
                  <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="47">
              <name>Rights</name>
              <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998787">
                  <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="49">
              <name>Subject</name>
              <description>The topic of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998788">
                  <text>Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998789">
                  <text>Comprehensive plan publications</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998790">
                  <text>Master plan reports</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998791">
                  <text>Zoning--Michigan</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998792">
                  <text>Zoning--Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998793">
                  <text>Maps</text>
                </elementText>
                <elementText elementTextId="998794">
                  <text>Land use--planning</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="45">
              <name>Publisher</name>
              <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998795">
                  <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Special Collections &amp; University Archives</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="43">
              <name>Identifier</name>
              <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998796">
                  <text>RHC-240</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="42">
              <name>Format</name>
              <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998797">
                  <text>application/pdf</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="51">
              <name>Type</name>
              <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998798">
                  <text>Text</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
            <element elementId="44">
              <name>Language</name>
              <description>A language of the resource</description>
              <elementTextContainer>
                <elementText elementTextId="998799">
                  <text>eng</text>
                </elementText>
              </elementTextContainer>
            </element>
          </elementContainer>
        </elementSet>
      </elementSetContainer>
    </collection>
    <itemType itemTypeId="1">
      <name>Text</name>
      <description>A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text.</description>
    </itemType>
    <elementSetContainer>
      <elementSet elementSetId="1">
        <name>Dublin Core</name>
        <description>The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/.</description>
        <elementContainer>
          <element elementId="43">
            <name>Identifier</name>
            <description>An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008018">
                <text>Eastlake_Master-and-Recreation-Plan_2012</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="39">
            <name>Creator</name>
            <description>An entity primarily responsible for making the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008019">
                <text>Northwest Michigan Council of Governments</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="40">
            <name>Date</name>
            <description>A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008020">
                <text>2012-02</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="50">
            <name>Title</name>
            <description>A name given to the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008021">
                <text>Village of Eastlake Master Plan and Recreation Plan</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="41">
            <name>Description</name>
            <description>An account of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008022">
                <text>The Village of Eastlake Master Plan and Recreation Plan was prepared by the Northwest Michigan Council of Governments in February 2012.</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="49">
            <name>Subject</name>
            <description>The topic of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008023">
                <text>Recreation--planning</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008024">
                <text>Master plan reports</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008025">
                <text>Eastlake (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008026">
                <text>Manistee Township (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008027">
                <text>Manistee County (Mich.)</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="48">
            <name>Source</name>
            <description>A related resource from which the described resource is derived</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008028">
                <text>&lt;a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/870"&gt;Planning and Zoning Center Collection (RHC-240)&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="47">
            <name>Rights</name>
            <description>Information about rights held in and over the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008030">
                <text>&lt;a href="http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/NoC-US/1.0/"&gt;No Copyright - United States&lt;/a&gt;</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="51">
            <name>Type</name>
            <description>The nature or genre of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008031">
                <text>Text</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="42">
            <name>Format</name>
            <description>The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008032">
                <text>application/pdf</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="44">
            <name>Language</name>
            <description>A language of the resource</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1008033">
                <text>eng</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
          <element elementId="45">
            <name>Publisher</name>
            <description>An entity responsible for making the resource available</description>
            <elementTextContainer>
              <elementText elementTextId="1038307">
                <text>Grand Valley State University. University Libraries. Lemmen Library and Archives</text>
              </elementText>
            </elementTextContainer>
          </element>
        </elementContainer>
      </elementSet>
    </elementSetContainer>
  </item>
</itemContainer>
