199 24 5790 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d21881b093160d2388640fc81b0acab4.pdf acdaa8b19994695fb0b66a7bfd73ec47 PDF Text Text October 20, 2001 Memo To: C. David Campbell, Chair and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Maureen H. Smyth, Chair CMF Supporting Organization Committee Re: Minutes of the Supporting Organization Committee The Supporting Organization Committee conducted its annual meeting with representatives of the two supporting organizations to the Council of Michigan Foundations- the Michigan AIDS Fund (MAF) and Michigan Community Foundations' Ventures (MCFV)- on October 18, via conference call at 4:30p.m. Committee members in attendance included; C. David Campbell, Gil Hudson, Elizabeth Sullivan, Rob Collier and Mariam Noland, who also represented Jack Hopkins, Chair ofMCFV. Leonard Smith, Chair ofMAF also participated. Michigan AIDS Fund Mr. Smith noted that the Board ofMAF is losing three trustees this year who have completed nine years of service - three successive terms of three years each - Ira Strwnwasser from the Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation, Barb Getz from the Gerber Fow1dation, and Glenn Kossick from the Metro Health FoWldation. He indicated that Gerald Smith has agreed to serve as the new CMF Trustee replacing Ira Strumwasser. Elizabeth Sullivan and Rob Collier will continue to serve as the other two of three required CMF Trustees on the MAF Board. He noted that two new individuals are being recommended as Trustees for consideration by the Supporting Organization Committee: Dr. Nora Malloy, Senior Program Officer of the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation, and Larry Washington, Vice President with Dow Chemical. Upon motion duly made, supported and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the following individuals be presented to the Board of Trustees of CMF for appointment to the Board of the Michigan AIDS Fund for a three-year term as the Class of 2004. • Elizabeth SuUivan, Kresge Foundation • Rob CoUier, Council of Michigan Foundations • Gerald Smith, Detroit Youth Foundation • David Swenson, Saginaw Community Foundation • Dr. Nora Maloy, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation • Larry Washington, Dow Chemical Company Mr. Collier and Ms. Sullivan abstained from the vote. Mr. Smith noted that Glenn Jack, Executive Director ofMAF, would join him, for the annual report to the CMF Board on October 31. �CMF Supporting Organization Minutes October 18, 200 I Page 2 Michigan Community Foundations' Ventures Mariam Noland, Vice Chair ofMCFV, noted that Jack Hopkins, Chair ofMCFV, was returning from the Annual Community Foundations Conference in Vancouver, which was why he was unable to be on the call. She indicated that the Class of 2004, includes herself, and that each of the recommended trustees currently serves and is eligible to be appointed for another three year tem1. The three CMF Tmstees required to be on the MCFV Board are D iana Sieger, President oft:he Grand Rapids Community Foundation, Olivia Maynard, Tmstee of the Les Cheneaux Community Foundation, and Neeta Delaney, President of the Jackson County Community Foundation. Patty Reynolds, President of the Capital Region Community Foundation, serves on the MCFV Board and is being elected to the CMF Board as a replacement for Neeta Delaney. Upon motion duly made, supported and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the following individuals be presented to the Board of Trustees of CMF for appointment to the Board of Michigan Community Foundations' Ventures for a three year term as the Class of 2004. • Brenda Hunt, President, Battle Creek Community Foundation • Mariam Noland, President, Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan • Victor Papale, President, Community Foundation of Greater Flint • Jeanne Snow, President, Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation • David Woodworth, President, Upper Peninsula Community Foundation Alliance. Ms. Noland abstained from the vote. She noted that Mr. Hopkins planned on being at the October 31 CMF Board Meeting to make the annual report on MCFV. Mr. Collier added that MCFV had sponsored a booth in the exhjbit area at the Community Foundations Conference in Vancouver with the products from Phase II of the Venture Products Fund. He indicated that there is great interest in the identity system, ads, and other products. Ms. Noland added that MCFV is fulfilling its mission of supporting collaborations by community foundations that will contribute to both their continued growth and economies in operations. There being no further business the call was adjourned at 4:50 p.m. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Supporting-Organization-Committee Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book supporting organization committee Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book supporting organization committee. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50440 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/ba7417f6b91e4fe15ba4c6cca0be7993.pdf 9a49fe5b4d39bbd59db2b6fd1abbeac2 PDF Text Text so September 24, 2001 Memo To: C. David Campbell. Cbainnan and Board ofTrustees From: Vicki Rosenberg RE: Strategic Planning: Next Steps Following the October 2"d Board meeting, CMF staff. working with Phase II Task Forces and Committees, will complete the strategies and tactics needed to complete the 20022006 Strategic Plan. Following are: (I) a summary of key dates during the remainder of 2001; (2) a discussion of the role and composition of the Long-Range Planning Committee during the final phase of planning; and (3) a summary of goals for each of the Task Forces and Committees. Key Dates • • • October: o Revisions to plan based on actions taken at October 2nd Board meeting o Meetings of the Marketing-Communications, Services. and EducationNetworking Task Forces to proceed toward achieving all goals o Strategic Plan Update to Board of Trustees at October 31 meeting November: o Presentation of strategic plan update and components to members at the Annual Conference including logo and positioning statement, website homepage, Rapid Response System, and on-line education program plan with demonstration in Resource Central. o Meetings of the Marketing-Communications and Technology Task Forces o Meeting ofU1e Long-Range Planning Committee (tentative) o First stage work on CMF 2002 budget December: o Meetings of the Marketing-Communications and Technology Task Forces o Development of CMF 2002 budget Long Range Plannin g Committee Involving a broad spectrum ofCMF members and Trustees in the development of guidelines. policies, strategies, and tactics for the 2002-2006 Strategic Plan has proven to be a very successful strategy. Trustees who chair the Task Forces and Comm ittees have provided invaluable guidance and direction to CMF staff. Members and Trustees serving �51 as members of these groups have provided hig hly informed input on ways in which CMF can increase its value to members and achieve its mission and newly articulated vision. To complete this process, CMF wishes to maximize the added value of Trustee leadership by expanding the current Long-Range Planning Committee to include Trustees serving as chairs of Phase 1I Task Forces and Committees and select CMF staff who have served as lead staff for these groups. The expanded Committee would meet in late fall to look at all of the recommendations that will be forthcoming from the Task Forces on Education/Networking, MarketingCommunications, and Services and from Committees on Government Relations and Membership. Its goal will be to provide leadership on the integration of these recommendations into a comprehensive plan for CMF's future. The Committee's fmal recommendations wilJ inform the Technology Task Force. Phase ll Task Forces & Committees Following the October 2, 200 I Board meeting, CMF staff. guided b) Phase II Task Forces and Committees, will complete their recommendations as articulated in the Strategic Planning Update found under Tab One. �Values Statements We Build Relationships to Last - with our members first- and with the philanthropic, non-profit, private, and public sectors, and the general public second - through advocating and networking. Our goal is to know every member well, to represent every individual engaged in organized, Michigan-based philanthropy, and to include a diverse group of members in our thinking and planning. Our existing and future relationships with leaders in all sectors are built to bring added value to our members individually and collective!y. We Act as A Servant-Leader for organized philanthropy - by promoting and increasing philanthropy in Michigan. We serve by understanding and meeting members' individual needs. We lead by anticipating and then meeting members' collective needs. In this role, we espouse the highest ethical standards. Our success is measured by the health and vitality of organized philanthropy in Michigan and by the level of civil society in our state- now and in the future. We Have, Share, and Seek Knowledge - with members and in support of membersthrough education and networking. Our knowledge is personjfied by staffwith deep expertise in philanthropic principles and best practices worldwide - from the technical to the topical to the philosophical, and with skills in research and communications; by members who continually redefine best practices and represent expertise in a vast array of subjects and on a wide range of issues; and by partners and collaborators who enrich our understanding oft he needs for and impact of organized philanthropy. We Strive for Excellence io Everything We Do - through a strong infrastructure-- clear goals, strong leadership, expert staff and effective management systems - that enable us to be nimble, entrepreneurial, and good stewards of our resources. These qualities allow us to provide our members with the best, most comprehensive services available to organized philanthropy anywhere. We believe to achieve excellence requires CMF as a who le-- each staff member and the Board of Trustees -- to reflect, innovate, communicate, grow, and improve. Our goal is to have all members recognize CMF as the most valuable association to which they belong. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Strategic-Planning Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book strategic planning Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book strategic planning. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50439 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d6bdf49adb18ef4919792353f7d50a10.pdf 3da672897a2471340c26691fc0a836a0 PDF Text Text 2 September 24, 2001 Memo To: C. David Campbell, Chairman and Board ofTrustees From: Vicki Rosenberg, COO RE: Update on CMF Strategic Planning Process: May 2001 Board Meetings & Phase IT Work- May through September, 2001 May 10, 2001 Board Meeting On May I0, 2001 , the Board of Trustees participated in a strategic planning work session. At the meeting, staff reported on findings from the data-gathering process, and presented a draft Vision Statement and draft Values Statement for comment and revision. The approved Statements are provided below. • Vision Statement "To be the premier philanthropic association." • V nlues S tatement We build relarlonships to last. We act as a Servant-Leader for organized philanthropy. We have, seek, and share knowledge. We strive for excellence in everything we do. During the discussion of values, tbe issue of diversity was raised. The Board expressed its commitment to djversity and inclusion and agreed that that commitment required more than additional language in the first part of the four part Value Statement. Please see Tab 8 for a fuller discussion of thjs issue. Finally, Board and staff worked in small groups to review CMF's purpose statements, and to develop one goal, strategy, and tactic for each. The results of that work follow. �3 Update on Strategic Plan September 24,2001 Page2 Revised Purposes, Goals, Strategies & Tactics Advocate: To represent Michigan philanthropic interests and concerns with state and national government. 2- Yr Goal: For CMF Members and leaders to have effective relationships with state and federal officials Key Strategy: Develop a network of CMF members who have annual contact with key state leaders of both parties in executive and legislative branches, and all federal Michigan delegates. Tactic: Hold annual state legislative day. E ducate: To help grantmakers be highly effective by providing educational resources and services. 5-Yr Goal: To have 75% of members participate in high-quality CMF education programs built on global best practices Key Strategy: Develop education programs based on member needs. Tactic: Develop programs in coUaboration with national affinity groups. Increase: To grow philanthropy in Michigan. 5-Yr Goal: To engage 350 new philanthropists in Michigan. Key strategy: Build strong alliances with financial advisors. Create an advisors' network. Tactic: Lead: To facilitate and support philanthropic responses to critical needs in the state. 5-Yr Goal: To have 35% of CMF members participate in the evaluation of opportunities for coordinated response. Key Strategy: Create a system for member involvement in decision making about opportunities for coordinated action. Action Idea: To create and test a rapid response method over the next two years. �4 Update on Strategic Plan September 24, 2001 Page 3 Network: To provide the means for regular sharing of ideas and experiences among grantmakers and with grantseekers. 5-Yr Goal: To have 75% of members participate in networking opportunities Key Strategy: Offer expanded networking opportunities (regional, topical, statewide, national). Hold a series of regional networking events. P romote: To help M ichigan citizens understand and appreciate the role of philanthropy. 5-Yr Goal: To help members partner with grantees to be effective communicators of philanthropy's on quality of life, and develop working relationships with the state's media. Key Strategy: Engage members, grantees, and the media in promoting philanthropy. Tactic: Conduct workshops, editorial roundtables, and media advisories. Membership To conduct alJ activities necessary to operate the premier philanthropic association. & Operations: 5-Yr Goal: To have capacity and resources that match our needs, purposes, and vision (including revenue, marketing, technology) Key Strategy: Increase internal capacity including: revenues, marketing, technology. �5 Update on Slnltegic Plan September24, 2001 Page4 May 11, 2001 Board Meeting At the May 11,2001 Board meeting, staff provided Trustees with a summary of the results of the May 10, 2001 Board session. In addition, a plan for Phase II of the Strategic Planning process was presented and approved. That plan called for the creation of special task forces and expanded Committees to be led by Board members, comprised of a representative mix of members, and supported by staff. Their charge would be to develop promising strategies and tactics in six key areas through a highly inclusive, participatory process. By late June, the Task Forces and Committees were fooned. They are generously served by 54 members, 15 Trustees, and Bob Tobin who is a member of the MarketingCommunications Task Force. In addition, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the Kresge Foundation and the Charles Stewart Mott Fooodation generously agreed to serve as coconveners of the Technology Task Force. For your information we have included the Task Force and Committee Rosters and a calendar of Task Force and Committee meetings. In May and June, CMF staff consolidated all aspects of the Strategic Plan to define and articulate the purpose, scope of work, goals, and timelines for each Task Force and Committee. An orientation document was provided to Chairs who were convened via conference call to develop a common vision for moving forward with Phase II. 'In addition, staff examined the six areas to be covered by the Task Forces and Committees as step one in the process of preparing Briefing Papers that have been provided to each group to inform and guide their work. Finally, CMF management met with the Technology Task Force co-conveners to review organizational goals and priorities. In July, August and September, Task Forces and Committees met in person and via conference call to begin developing recommendations. Most groups have met twice. The Technology Task Force had its first orientation conference call in September. The Membership Committee will have its first all-day meeting on September 28lh. An overview of the six Task Forces and Committees. their chairs and goals follows. �6 Update on Strategic Plan September 24, 200 I Page~ MARKETING & COMMlJNJCATIONS, Chair, Neeta Delaney Purpose to Address: Membership & Operations Goal: To Make Recommendations Regarding: Communications: • Target audiences: members, non-members, grantseekers, public, other • Graphic identity including logo • Website (content, look, other) • Regular publications (type, content, frequency) • Special publications • Other Marketing: • • • • Target Audiences: members, potential members, etc. Marketing Messages Marketing Strategies Appropriate percentage of budget to be allocated to marketing EDUCATION & NETWORKING TASK FORCE, Chair, Elizabeth Sullivan Purposes to Address: Education, Network, Increase · Goal: To Make Recommendations Regarding: • Education/networking programs to keep, eliminate, revise • New education/networking programs to develop & offer • Schedule of offerings for programs to be repeated (annual, bi-annual, etc.) • Evaluation methods for education/networking programs • Process for periodic review/revision to offerings • Related ideas for Technology and Marketing/Communications Task Forces MEMBERSHIP COMMITTEE, Chair, Gil Hudson Purposes to Address: Membership & Operations Goals to Accomplish: Recommendations Regarding: • Member benefits to be provided automatically with dues • Membership categories and descriptions for new ones • Membership retention strategies • Annual membership growth goals and related campaign strategy • Dues structure • Related ideas to Technology and Marketing/Communications Task Forces �7 Update on Strategic Plan September 24, 2001 Page6 SERVICES TASK FORCE, Chair, Dave CampbeU Purpose to Address: Membership & Operations Goals to Accomplish: Recommendations Regardjng: • Policy for providing services to non-members and grantseekers • Current or new services to be offered on a fee basis • Fee structure for services to members, non-members, grantseekers • Related ideas for Technology and Marketing/Communications task forces TECHNOLOGY TASK FORCE, Chair, Dick Rappleyc Purposes to Address: Membership & Operations Goals to Accomplish: Recommendations Regarding: • Long-term technology plan for CMF • Process for on-going review/revision of CMF technology platform • Use of technology for specific programs, products, services, (drawing on recommendation from other task forces) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Strategic-Planning-Update Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book strategic planning update Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book strategic planning update. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50438 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/93c806f29bfbcaf100f720d0dd44ba09.pdf 869b4d044dafb6e5b842e05ef0ff30c7 PDF Text Text 47 September 24,2001 Memo To: C. David Campbell, Chairman and Board ofTrustees F rom: Vicki Rosenberg, COO Re: Measuring Our Progress: Now and in the Future CMF's Strategic Planning process has been guided by questions developed by the Board at its October 2000 meeting. Measuring our progress against answering these questions is an important step in completing Phase n of our process. Once CMF begins implementing the 2002-2006 Strategic Plan, it wiU important to measure progress in meeting the goals set out in that Plan. The Vision Metrics that constitute an important component of the Plan have been in draft form since winter 2000/01. Therefore, during the October 2, meeting, Bob Tobin will guide t he Board through a discussion about: • • Our progress in successfully addressing the Board's October 2000 Guiding Questions; and T he draft Vision Metrics and changes needed to more closely tie those to t he evolving Stra tegic Pla n. To inform our discussion, the following background materials are provided: • The Board's Guiding Questions • The current draft Vision Metrics • Board and Member Desires & Aspirations for CMF • Opportunities identified through the SWOT Analysis G uiding Questions: October 2000 I. How can we best serve the evolving needs of an increasingly diverse, special ized membership? 2. Are we a state, regional, national, or international organization? 3. What is our desired relationship with state government? 4. How do we define and manage our evolving role as an intermediary? 5. How do we resolve tensions between our dual roles of membership service and philanthropic leader? 6. What is our hierarchy of roles and initiatives relative to our mission? 7. What metrics are most important to us as we look into the future? �48 Vision Metrics: Winter 2000-01 o o o o o Philanthropic Resources: annual philanthropic giving by CMF members Leverage Factor: total $ flowing through CMF per member dollar New Foundations: created between 2001 and 2006 Market Share: %of eligible members who belong to CMF Member Satisfaction: % of members reporting "excellent" value Board & Member Desires for CMF to: Boa rd • Grow as a successful conduit/vehicle for philanthropy • Increase its capacity to be flexible and responsive to member needs • Increase emphasis on education/capacity building [infonnation development, training, technical support] • Include more diverse representation • fncrease philanthropic resources of state with emphasis on financial support and knowledge transfer • Advance cooperation of all resources to advance public good (connect silos) • Develop sustainable, long-tenn funding [new revenue streams other than dues] • Be the premier RAG • Advocate for/build legislative environment conducive to our "best" work • Strengthen promotion to build positive awareness • Help 30-and 40-someUlings become engaged/active in philanthropy • Help advance intergenerational transfer of philanthropic interest in fam ily foundations • Brand "philanthropy" and/or "foundation" in ways that connect with public • Develop clear membership criteria - including issue of single purpose organizations • Build strongest possible relationships with professional advisors to wealthy Members (via Focus Groups & S urvey) • Design ways to involve members in decision making about intermediary opportunities • Increase philanthropy in a way that balances the c reation of new family foundations with the c reation of new funds in community foundatio ns • Be alert to tbe impact membership g rowth may have on tbe quality of the membership cxpencnce • Increase the number and type of networking opportunities (a highly valued service) including by issue, within regions, and for member-to-member exchange • Strengthen conununications including: promotion ofCMF. web and print based products, member to staff communication, and clarification of purpose statements • Make members our highest priority by: building value to members into every activity, knowing every member and meeting their needs, and providing equitable service across member type, asset level, and location (of most concern to corporate givers and famil y foundations) �49 • Promote principles and best practices through education, technical assistance, and sharing of best practices from in and outside of Michigan with members and others "Key Trends Analysis" (January 200J) Member Expectations of High Performing Associations • High quality, customized programs and services based on generational preferences • Help brokcring partnerships and collaborations • Proactive servant leadership On-demand access to information and services • Effective advocacy with state government • Leadership for best practices and standards Organizational Cha racteristics: • Shared decision making • Customer focused • G lobal Mindset • Entrepreneurial, nimble SWOT Analysis (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) Opporttmities What We Don't Have but Want • More Market Share (members, service utilization) • More members/more d iverse members (next generation, people of color) • New categories of members • Partnering with competitors • Higher revenue generation via dues, fees for service. packaged product sales • Equitable services for all member types and asset levels • Effective marketing (including capacity, programs, resources) • Expanded role as connector of constituents • Regular self-assessment and planning (e.g., every three years) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Progress-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book progress report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book progress report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50437 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/742d9988203504d8974bb3a231ca3df8.pdf 0322ef676432ac12998431127b9b78f1 PDF Text Text Minutes of the Special Meeting of the Board of Trustees Council of Michigan Foundations October 2, 2001 The meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF) was held at the University Club ofMSU in Lansing, Michigan, on Tuesday, October 2, 2001 pursuant to written notice duly given. The m eeting was called to order at 10:00 a.m. by C. David Campbell, Chair. Trustees and officers present in addition to Mr. Campbell: Robert S. Collier Gerald K. Smith Julie F. Cummings Maureen H. Smyth Ira Strumwasser Neeta M. Delaney Elizabeth C . Sullivan Herbert D. Doan Richard K. Rappleye Richard T. Groos William C. Richardson Gilbert Hudson S. Martin Taylor Donald R. Parfet Margaret (Ranny) A. Riecker Amanda Van Dusen Kari Schlachtenhaufen Lloyd J. Yeo CMF Staff & Guests: Vicki J. Rosenberg, Vice President & Chief Operating Officer David R. Lindberg, Vice President Finance & Administration Judy M. Carl, Director, Marketing & Communications Jeri L. Fischer, Director, Membership Services Donnell Mersereau, Di rector, Community Foundations Gail Powers-Schaub, Director, Technology and Infom1ational Services Bob Tobin, Williams Group Karl Olmsted, Olmsted Associates I. Special Items of Business September 11 Chairman Campbell opened the meeting with a moment of silence in honor of those lost and those affected by the September 11 tragedies. Mr. Collier reviewed the electronic survey of members resulting in the posting of members' responses on the CMF website. A two-page summary of resources and ideas for helping was distributed to all members with the new Annual Report. At the request of State Superintendent of Education Tom Watkins, the Learning to Give Project developed six lessons plans, on both responding to tragedies and the diversity of our society, that he will be delivering to all public schools in Michigan. �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes of October 2, 2001 Page 2 Family Foundation Retreat Vice Chair Julie Cummings reported on the successful Retreat held September 28-30 at the Crystal Mountain Resort for 75 trustees, staff and children from family foundations. Annual Conference Mr. Collier noted that Grants Manager Barb Dryer has taken on the added responsibility of Conference Coordinator in light of Sandy Katt's departure. He encouraged each Trustee to register and help promote the Conference with their colleagues. Emergency Homelessness Prevention Project Mr. Lindberg indicated the need for a formal Board resolution indicating our willingness to receive $22,000 from the Michigan State Housing Development Authority (MSHDA) to help cover our administrative expenses on the $1 million Emergency Homelessness Prevention Project with community foundations. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the Council of Michigan Foundations accept $22,000 for administrative expenses from the Michigan State Housing Development Authority as part of the Emergency Homelessness Prevention Project. Nominating Committee Report Conm1ittee Chair Maureen Smyth presented the Nominating Committee Repott. She reported the ballot has been mailed to the CMF membership, which included the new nominees in addition to the current trustees up for re-nomination to represent the class of 2004. She also indicated that Bob Aronson and Rev. Lewis Felton would be presented for appointment by the Board on October 31, 2001 to complete the tenns of Ralph Gerson and James Greene. II. Strategic Plan Update Ms. Rosenberg reviewed the results of the Board's Strategic Planning Session on May 10 in Midland and noted that four Special Task Forces and two Committees involving 54 members and 15 trustees, have met since then to advance the Strategic Planning process. • Government Relations Committee Mr. Collier presented the two action recommendations of the Committee for Committee Co- Chair Libby Maynard. He noted that three more goals have been completed and moved to the accomplishments list. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the Legislative Goals Statement be approved with the following changes noted (a copy of which is attached to these minutes): �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes of October 2, 2001 Page 3 National Legislative Issues Revision of Goal 4: To repeal the excise tax on private foundations, replacing the previous goal of reducing the excise tax to a flat one percent. State Legislative Issues Addition of new Goal to support simplification of the Charitable Solicitation Act. Mr. Collier than reviewed the Committee's recommendation that the Board endorse the concept of supporting the creation of a bi-partisan philanthropy caucus by the leadership ofthe State Legislature. The goal is to have a core group of legislators familiar with philanthropy who can help educate new colleagues arriving in the Legislature. This concept is on response to term limits. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that CMF encourage formation of a Philanthropy Caucus by the leadership of the State Legislature as a bi-partisan group of up to 20 state legislators representing both the Senate and the House who can inform their colleagues about the work of foundations and corporate giving programs and encourage them to use CMF as a resource. • Education-Networking Task Force Task Force Chair Elizabeth Sullivan reported! on the work of her Task Force and the two recommendations on educational programming. She also reviewed the Decision Making Criteria endorsed by the Task Force to assist staff in reviewing member requests for education programming. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approves a Core Curriculum for 2002 that will cover five key competency areas (grantmaking, governance, finance, administration, and communications). Ms. Sullivan led the discussion about issue programming and the Task Force's recommendation that up to three topics be covered each year. She noted that the issues re listed are examples rather than an all-inclusive list. Upon motion duly made, supported! and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that CMF offer educational programming on up to three issue areas of high concern to members each year. • Technology Task Force Task Force Chair Dick Rappleye reported on the initial work of the three co-convenors of this Task Force and the recognition that their work would begin after the other Task Forces and Committees have completed their assignments. He noted that the CoConvenors are assisting staff in responding to three short terms needs related to the 2001 �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes of October 2, 2001 Page 4 Annual Conference. Gail Schaub offered a brief demonstration of the Zoomerang system being recommended and commented that the anticipated cost of the pilot in 2002 should not exceed $2,000. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that a " Rapid Response System" to obtain member feedback on time sensitive issues be piloted in 2002. Trustee Julie Cmmnings noted the importance of increasing the use of technology, specifically email, for staff/Board communication. • Services Task Force Services Task Force Chair C. David Campbell led the discussions of the three recommendations being presented for action, noting that their value in helping staff with time allocation was more important than revenue generation. The services will not be broadly marketed during the pilot because there is not sufficient staff capacity to respond. It was noted that the Membership Committee will be consulted on fees. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that a pilot program be approved to charge members fees for individualized technical services on board training, grantmaking guidelines and program d evelopment, strategic planning, exec.utive searches, and other services with guidelines for setting fees to be developed with input from the Finance Committee. Campbell also noted the role that CMF plays in helping to create foundations and that it cannot be taken for granted that a new foundation will become a member. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the provision of the following services to eligible nonmembers be offered as an enticement to membership: a) complimentary consultation on foundation establishment, limited to providing a "how to" guide and verbal orientation. b) If requested, foundation establishment services for a fee with a membership dues rebate possible upon joining CMF. Finally, Campbell noted the Task Force's discussion of individual services being provided to grantseekers and members strong feeling that such requests should not include individual searches but be limited to copies of the complimentary "Survey and biformationfor Seeking" publication and a referral to one of the Foundation Center Cooperating Collections. RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the elimination of any individualized service to grantseekers beyond the current "Survey and Information for Seeking" now used. �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes of October 2, 2001 Page 5 • Marketing/Communications Task Force Task Force Chair Neeta Delaney explained the initial work of the Task Force in reviewing all of the many publications produced by CMF and the recommendation that the current logo and positioning statement be updated, given the growing competitive marketplace for philanthropic membership associations. She introduced Karl Olmsted of Olmsted Associates in Flint whose fim1 has done award winning work for the C.S. Mott Foundation, and has been retained to assist with these tasks. Olmsted presented three options for a revised logo and three options for a new positioning statement. He also introduced four color palettes - the existing light b lue, a royal blue, a blue green and a light green. During lunch, the Trustees had the opportunity to vote on their first choices. Ms. Delaney noted that there was consensus on the logo and color palette. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that an updated logo and color (as attached to these minutes) be adopted for use beginning at the 29th Annual Conference. Ms. Delaney then led a discussion with Mr. Tobin's help about the role of the positioning statement. There was consensus by the Board that such a statement had to recognize the organization's role as a support to both foundations and corporations. A vote was held on the three statements w ith the most votes, but not a majority of those present, for "Supporting a Culture of Giving'' Mr. Campbell indicated that the feelings of the Board would be shared with the Task Force with the hope of still having a new positioning statement to share at the Annual Members Meeting on November 1, 2001. • Membership C ommittee Conm1ittee Chair Gil Hudson shared the results of the Membership Committee Meeting, and the four proposed resolutions for consideration. He noted that the Committee was still working on a number of issues, including those members that do not pay the recommended dues amount. He reviewed each of the membership categories before introducing a resolution to amend four categories and eliminate two as noted below. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve the following changes in membership criteria as endorsed by the Membership Committee and recommended by the Community Foundation Committee where appropriate: • Modify the criteria for Community Foundations to reflect the current state law for community foundations eligible for the community foundation tax credit. �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes of October 2, 2001 Page 6 • Redefine Community Foundation Affiliate to be limited to those participating in the Kellogg Youth Challenge and to further revoke their voting privileges as a CMF member. • Eliminate the category of Community Foundation Donor Advised Fund by grandfathering current members and closing the category to new members. • Eliminate the category of "Friends" of CMF. • Change the language in the Out-of-State Associates criteria from "must" to "should" have a grantmaking presence in Michigan. • Amend the criteria for Public Foundations to include "have a permanent endowment" and "make substantial grants for broad charitable purposes." Mr. Hudson reviewed the status of 66 members that are now more than two years delinquent in paying dues, noting that despite best efforts to have their memberships renewed by the end of the fiscal year on April! , 2002, up to 50 members could be lost. He indicated the Committee's recommendation to terminate the membership of those two years behind as of April 1, 2002 and that the Board adopt such a tennination policy. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED further that a policy be approved to terminate membership for non-responsive members that are more than two years delinquent on membership dues. Mr. Hudson summarized the Committee's Membership Retention Plan and Development Plan for 2002 (attached to these minutes) with a five-year goal of 578 by 200617. He explained that the goal had been well crafted with staff and reflects projected membership gains and losses including the anticipated loss of 50 non-dues paying members. Trustees can look forward to being asked at the February 2002 Meeting to assist with membership recruitment in 2002. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED further that the Membership Development Plan/Campaign for 2002, including the goal of 578 by 2006/7 be approved. Mr. Collier then introduced a three-part resolution from the Membership Committee. He noted that there was consensus by the Committee that our two lowest dues categories of $ 150 and $360 paid by 107 members are too low, and that the minimum dues should be raised to $500. In addition, there was consensus that the dues categories should be examined with the idea of reducing the ranges in the categories to better capture the growth in assets that will occur over time by members. Finally, there was agreement by �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes of October 2, 2001 Page 7 the Committee that the Finance Committee should examine a dues increase as projected budgets are developed for 2002 and beyond. After discussion on these three points, the Board decided to defer action for further analysis by the Finance Committee. Policy on Inclusion Mr. Tobin and Ms. Rosenberg facilitated a brief discussion on a statement on inclusion for CMF to adopt as part of the Strategic Planning Process. In reviewing six sample components, there was consensus that a policy statement needed to be action oriented and that inclusion needs to be better reflected in CMF's values statement. The item was referred for further discussion at the next Board Meeting. Next Steps Mr. Campbell indicated that because there was not sufficient time, we would defer discussion of the October 2000 Guiding Questions and the vision metrics to the next meeting. He noted the inclusion of the fall calendar for Next Steps in the Board book and that he plans on asking Task Force and Committee Chairs in 2002 to join with the members of the Executive Conunittee in expanding the Strategic Planning Committee into an ongoing Long Range Planning Committee. The next scheduled meeting of the Board of Trustees will be held October 31, 2001, at the Marriott Renaissance Hotel in Detroit from 9:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. There being no further business to come before the board, Chair, C. David Campbell adjourned the meeting at 3:00p.m. C. David Campbell, Chair 1:\Scuddington\ Board of Trustees\M inutes200 liM inutes0ct2nd.doc Robert S. Collier, President � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Previous-Board-Minutes Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book previous board minutes Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book previous board minutes. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50436 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/9c00a2f41bf27c361bce0329b48e6590.pdf d052382a75ac963bdba5450526919c47 PDF Text Text October 20, 2001 Memo to: Dave Campbell, Chair, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Rob Collier Re: President's Report Because my last Report was sent to you on July 31, with the Audit Report, this Report features activities s ince August 1. Please let me know if you have any questions about any of these items . All of your staff at CMF greatly appreciate the extra time contributed by Trustees and more than 50 members to the Task Forces and Committee Meetings held as part of our Strategic Planning Process. As we all learned at the Special Board Meeting on October 2, much progress has been made and continues to be made on the Strategic Plan. Response to September 11 CMF sent out a special resource sheet to all members on September 14. In addition, we surveyed members and have created a September 11 response section on the cmif.org website. A copy of this section is included at the back of your Board book. In response to a call from State Education Superintendent Tom Watkins, Kathy Agard and her team at Learning to Give pulled together six lesson plans that have now been disseminated statewide by Tom's office. The lessons focus on giving in a time of crisis as well as recognizing the diversity of our state population. We continue to provide individual assistance to members in planning their individual responses to the tragedies of September 11. Conferences and Meetings August 22-23 Grantmaking Basics. Ypsilanti Thirty-eight staff from a diversity of members participated in this Grantmaking Basics seminar that took the place of what we used to call the Institute for New Trustees and Staff. We appreciated the efforts of a fine guest faculty, including John Marshall who Jed the discussion on Principles and Best Practices. September 13 - Michigan Municipal League, Battle Creek Three community foundation grantmakers joined me for a session with 75 city and village officials at the League's Annual Conference. We hope this session will strengthen partnerships between community foundations and municipal officials. September 13- Alliance of United Way Community Services Executives Retreat - Port Huron �President's Report October 200 I Jeri Fischer represented CMF on a panel to discuss state trends and their impact on philanthropy before this group of Agency Executives from southeast Michigan. �President's Report October 200 I September 19 -Michigan IDA Partnership State Conference More than 140 practitioners from the 30 program sites and three regional coordinating organizations were joined by a small group of funders for the first ever IDA Conference in Michigan. The Partnership has now funded 580 accounts through the program sites, and I am working with interested members to raise the needed $4 million private match. Executive Director, Eric Muschler was invited to participate in a national meeting held by the Annie E. Casey Foundation on Federal Funding for the Savings for Working Families Act. September 28-30 Family Foundation Retreat Our thanks to Julie Cummings and Susan Howbert for producing a remarkable Family Foundation Retreat. The 75 plus participants and their children remarked on the special family feeling that was conveyed by the faculty and the setting at Crystal Mountain. Publications In August you should have received the summer issue of The Michigan Scene as well as the CMF 2001 Annual Report. Three new publications (Copies in the back of your Trustee book) have been completed in September. Make A Difference Produced by our Mawby Sununer Intern, Kari Pardoe, this colorful, six page tri-fold responds to the many requests received for an orientation piece for new youth grantmakers. Each of the 86 community foundation youth advisory committees in Michigan has received 10 copies for use with their fall recruitment of new Y AC members. The publication will also be posted on the youth grantmakers website www.mcfyp.org for use by interested groups outside of Michigan. Youth Grantmakers Contribute to Community Foundation Growth This four-page brochure by Karin Tice, our community foundation evaluator, responds to the many requests received from conununity foundations nationally about the role that youth grantmakers have played in helping with the fund development of Michigan community foundations. Copies were recently distributed at the Council on Foundations Annual Community Foundations Conference in Vancouver. This brochure will also be on the www.mcfyp.org website. Standards For Community Foundations: Challenges and Lessons Learned This eight-page publication, also by Karin Tice with contributions by Dottie Reynolds, our range rider for three years, was a highlight of the Community Foundations Conference in Vancouver earlier this month. As community foundations nationwide begin the process of being in compliance with standards set forth by the Council on Foundations, they are eager to learn from our experiences in Michigan. As with the previous publication, production is possible thanks to special support from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. This document is located on the CMF website at www.cmif.org. �President's Report October 200 I Community Foundations as Environmental Stewards In addition, Mark Ducker, a filmmaker from Lansing completed production on the 11 minute video Community Foundations as Environmental Stewards. Produced with support from the Great Lakes Protection Fund, this video tells the story of the Community foundation for Muskegon County in becoming a successful environmental grantmaker. Copies of the video are being provided to every community foundation in the USA and Canada as well as placed on the CMF website and the Great Lakes Environmental Network website. It is hoped that the video will motivate community foundations to use their convening and grantmaking abilities to attract new donors interested in supporting environmental grantmaking. Also following this report is the article on Learning to Give featured in the August issue of Association Management. Partnerships & Dissemination Great Lakes Community Foundation Environmental Collaborative - Phase III Notice has been received from the Great Lakes Protection Fund of a two-year grant for $250,000 to work with 17 new shoreline community foundations in the Great Lakes Basin. Consultants for the Collaborative will continue to be Sheila Leahy from Buffalo and David Hahn Baker from Buffalo. August 15 - New York State I spoke at a special meeting in Albany, New York, convened by the lskol and Alexander family foundations with representatives of community foundations statewide, to explore the feasibility of a statewide youth grantmaking initiative. August 20-22- Arkansas We hosted a team from the Arkansas Community Foundation for three days to discuss how to implement a statewide youth initiative. Marv King, our Youth Project Consultant, organized the tour with the help of several community foundations and their YACs. September 11 - Strengthening Nonprofit Advocacy Project - Detroit CMF assisted MNA in organizing a group offunders to participate in a focus group as part of the National Advocacy Project being conducted by the Lincoln Filene Center at Tufts and OMB Watch. September 26 - Non Profit Day- Lansing CMF joined with the Michigan Nonprofit Association in sponsoring this annual Day of seminars and networking in Lansing for more than I 00 nonprofit organizations. October 3- Land Use Funders- Lansing With special grant support, CMF assisted the Land Use Funders in hosting 100 of their grantees from throughout Michigan to discuss strategies for joint public policy work on land use issues. Guest speaker, Patrick Noonan, President of the Conservation Fund, indicated that he knows of no other state where grantmakers are bringing their grantees together for such a dialogue. �President's Report October 200 I October 8 - 9 - Devolution Seminar - Lansing With special grant support from the Skillman Foundation, and the help of Pat Babcock from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, CMF worked with Public Sector Consultants in organizing a special seminar to discuss devolution, T ANF reauthorization and strategies for grantmaking. We will assist Skillman in distributing a report on the proceedings. October 9-12 - International Delegations from Brazil and Mexico After three months of planning by Julia Szanton, our International Coordinator, and with grant support from the C.S. Mott Foundation, two international delegations arrived for intensive site visits on community philanthropy. Four guests from Mexico used Ann Arbor as their base. Four guests from Brazil were based in Grand Rapids. On Saturday, October 13 both teams flew to the Council on Foundations Community Foundations Conference in Vancouver. Special thanks to the six community foundations that made these site visits a great success! October 15 City Connect, Detroit The first meeting of the permanent board of City Connect was held with Kari Schlachtenhaufen, first Board Chair, and Geneva Williams, Chief Operating Officer for the United Way Community Services of Southeastern MI, elected the first President. This marks the end of a two-year planning initiative staffed by Susan Howbert. October 13-19 Coalition of Community Foundations for Youth, Council on Foundations Annual Community Foundations Conference, WINGS-TCFN- Vancouver four primary activities to report on: • • • • Two youth grantmakers (Saba Gashugi from the Berrien Community Foundation and Josh Forhart from the Community Foundation of Delta County) joined me for the Annual Conference of Community Foundations for Youth and then presented in a session at the Conununity Foundations Conference. Donnell Mersereau presented our work on standards in a session at the Conference and attended the WINGS-TCFN Meeting of international support organizations to community philanthropy and chaired a five-day meeting of the governance working group of the Transatlantic Cornnmnity Foundation Network. More than 50 Michigan grantmakers participated in the annual Michigan evening with the extra bonus of 50 plus international guests thanks to the C.S. Mott Foundation. The Community Foundation Research and Development Incubator of Michigan Community Foundations' Ventures (staffed by the Williams Group) sponsored three focus groups and led a concurrent session on new research, products and communication tools. Special Activities CMF has been retained by the Jackson County Community Foundation to assist with the search process for a President to succeed Neeta Delaney in January 2002. Ads have been placed in regional newspapers as well as the Chronicle of Philanthropy. Resumes are being received until November 15. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Presidents-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book presidents report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book presidents report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50435 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/4ed77e330e60c5f56de295289fc17d5d.pdf 15666b0ded436bff19b6f208e774ba77 PDF Text Text 39 September 24, 2001 Memo To: C. David Campbell, Chairman and Board of Trustees From : Vicki Rosenberg RE: CMF Statement on Inclusion and Diversity At its February and May 2001 meetings, Trustees identified inclusion and diversity as issues of high importance to CMF. Presently, diversity is addressed in only one key CMF document, the 1997 Statement of Principles and Best Practices. (see below for the particular statement.) The May discussion focused on whether to include a statement on inclusion and diversity in the first point in the Values Statement that addresses relationships. The Board agreed that expanding that section to include language about inclusion and diversity would not be sufficient. It asked that further discussion be held on this issue toward identifying the best way to communicate and implement an organizational commitment to these principles. During the Octoher 2nd Roard meeting, Rob Tobin will facilita te a discussion on diversity and inclusion toward developing a policy statement and effective strategies for its implementation. To inform that d iscussion, the following are provided for review: • CMF Documents: (a) 1997 Statement from CMF's Principles & Best Practices Document; and (b) relevant section from CMF's new Values Statement. • COF & Donors Forum of Chicago policy statements on diversity and inclusion • Key Findings from "Building a Better Foundation: A toolkit for creating an inclusive grantmaking organization." Donors Forum of Chicago, Minnesota Council on Foundations, Northern California Grantmak,e rs, and New York Regional Association of Grantmakers, 2001. • Key Recommendations from "Diversity Practices in Foundations: Findings from a National Study". Joint Affinity Groups, 200 I . • Sample Diversity Statements from Select Associations and Corporations. �40 CMF DOCUMENTS Principles & Practices (1997) Draw on the full range of human talents available for board service, staff, and consultants. o o Some grantmakers have established a diversity policy to help them in considering how to obtain the best qualified individual for each task. Some grantmakers consider the demographics of their geographic area served when nominating board members and selecting staff. Values Statement (2001): Item One We build relationships to last: o With members first o With the philanthropic, non-profit, private, and public sectors, and general public second. o Through advocating and networking. o Our goal is to know every member well, to represent every individual engaged in organized, Michigan-based philanthropy, and to include a diverse group of members in our thinking and planning. o Our existing and future relationshlps with leaders in all sectors are buill to bring added value to our members individually and collectively. �41 COF & DONORS FORUM OF CIDCAGO Policy Statements on Diversity & Inclusion DONORS FORUM OF CIDCAGO (1996) Inclusiveness Policy The Donors Forum of Chicago, recognizing the diversity of Chicago's population and the value of having diverse perspectives and participation, is committed to providing equal opportunity to all people without regard for race, color, religion, gender, age, disability, national origin, marital status, sexual orientation or veteran status, in all aspects of its own organizational operations. The Donors Forum promotes inclusiveness in order to ensure that a range of perspectives, opinions and philosophy, are an integral part of the work carried out to fulfill the organization's mission. The Donors Forum shares the perspective that all people are pivotal to the improvement of the quality of life and need to be participants in the decision making process which involve issues that affect them. COUNCIL ON FOUNDATIONS lnclusivity Statement The Council on Foundations was formed to promote responsible and effective philanthropy. The mission requires a commitment to inclusiveness as a fundamental operating principle and calls for an active and ongoing process that affums human diversity in its many forms, encompassing but not Jjmited to ethnicity, race, gender, sexual orientation, economic circumstance, disability and philosophy. We seek diversity in order to ensure that a range of perspectives, opinions and experiences are recognjzed and acted upon in achieving the Council's mission. The Council also asks members to make a similar commitment to inclusiveness in order to better enhance their abilities to contribute to the common good of our changing society. Management Support and Resources The Council provides technical assistance, information and resources to assist members in making their organizations better able to address the needs of the diverse society in which we live. �42 DISCUSSION QUESTIONS FROM " Building a Better F oundation: A toolkit for creating an inclusive grantmakiog organization." Donors Forum of Chicago, Minnesota Council on Foundations, Northern California Grant:makers, New York Regional Association of Grantmakers, 200 I 1. How do you determine your priorities? Whose input do you seek? 2. Do you involve members in assessing your organization's funding process, accessibility, and understanding of their needs? 3. Do you have a diverse network of advisors, however formal or informal? How frequently do you add new people to your network? 4. How have the demographics of your communities changed over the last five years and what are the future projections? What impact will those changes have on your priorities? 5. What barriers do your members face in reaching diverse populations? Can you help them sunnount these barriers? Are some of these barriers evident in your own operations? 6. Does your membership process have requirements that serve as barriers to newer, emerging groups and communities? 7. What's the commitment of your board of directors and top management to diversity? 8. Does your organization have clear strategies for increasing its diversity? 9. How could your organization benefit from diverse perspectives brought by diverse staff, consultants, or trustees? I 0. How could the values of your organization be better achieved through inclusive employment and board-selection practices? II. How well do you know the different facets of your membership and its leaders and how well do they know your mission and staff? 12. Does your policy on inclusion and diversity extend to your investments and vendor relationships? �43 KEY RECOMMENDATIONS FROM "Diversity Practices in Foundations: Findings from a National Study" Joint Affinity Group, 2001 Include a commitment to diversity in key statements. Develop or refer to written materials that communicate diversity objectives. Committed organizations articulate the importance of diversity through their insitution' s mission, vision, values... Statements and organizational policies that reflect the centrality of diversity, formalize institutional commitment and establish a standard of accountability." Implement the Policy with these steps in mind: • Inform board and trustees about the value of diversity; • Undergo or provide traitllng to board, management, staff to increase understanding and improve communications at the outset of any diversity initiative. • Plan, dedicate needed resources, and evaluate progress as diversifying takes time, energy, and perseverance. • Gatht:r data through focus groups, surveys, and/or diversity audits to assess your organization' s diversity climate, and to identify areas of concern and desired outcomes. • Establish clearly defined internal goals, responsibilities and accountability mechanisms to design the initiative and identify professionals required. • Hire consultants, if expert and impartial help is needed. • Anticipate some failures, internal resistance, and departures and be willing to change systems and remove institutional barriers if necessary. �44 SAMPLE DIVERSITY STATEMENTS FROM ASSOCIATIONS & CORPORATIONS AMERICAN ZOO AND AQUARIUM ASSOCIATION Diversity Statement AZA recognizes and embraces the values of human diversity. We accept the moral and practical imperatives of our changing society, as well as the impacts of these changes on our personal and professional lives. We value and seek the strengths of human variety with respect to age, culture, gender, national origin, personal values and beliefs, physical abilities, race, religion and sexual orientation. In principle and in practice, AZA will commit time and resources to increasing diversity of our workforce. To serve our member institutions, AZA will assemble and provide resources on diversity programs, trends and issues. This statement applies to the Association's offices and its employees. It acknowledges that Association members may have their own statements or policies. It also acknowledges that a Diversity Special Committee has been established that will address diversity issues for the Association and its members �45 AUSTIN HUMAN RESOURCES MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION Mission To provide programs and resources that promote diversity as a strategic component in the individual and organizational success of Austin Human Resource Management Association members (AHRMA). Objective To reflect the greater Austin community in membership demographics, program topics and issues, community involvement, and broader sponsorship. We plan to do this by: Increasing the diversity of AHRMA membership within currently underrepresented groups through active recruitment; Disseminating information about and promoting the use of Historically Underutilized Businesses among AI-IRMA members; Supporting community events which facilitate selection, development and retention of a diverse workforce; Sharing practical information from local business leaders who have a visible commitment to diversity in the workplace. Strategy Our strategy is to position diversity as a component critical to our individual and organizational success as human resource professionals by: a. Acknowledging diversity as part of everything we do as opposed to a "stand alone" or "something extra" that we'll do if we have time. This means that diversity must be reflected in the philosophy, policies and practices of AHRMA as well as communicated through local best practices. b. Providing members with tangible skills and competencies in managing and maximizing diversity. This means information communicated to members through newsletters, programs, conferences must have a high "practical application quotient." c. Connecting diversity to bottom line performance measures that all members can identify, understand and commit to �46 HEWLETT PACKARD Diversity: Is the existence of many unique individuals in the workplace, marketplace and community that includes men and women from different nations, cultures, ethnic groups, lifestyles, generations, backgrounds, skills, and abilities. We welcome many dimensions of diversity to HP. We want every HP employee to come to work in an environment that welcomes who he or she is, so that in tum, they can contribute their best to HP's success. Inclusion: Is the work environment we are creating where everyone has an opportunity to fully participate in achieving business success and is valued for the distinctive skills, experiences and perspectives they bring to the workplace. Work/life navigation: Tools and resources • • • • E-tools for doing work Dependent care referral Employee assistance program Education assistance program Flexible, supportive environment to manage work and personal life demands • • • • Flexible time off opt ions Flexible work arrangements Telecommunting Job-sharing � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Policy-on-Inclusion-and-Diversity Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book policy on inclusion and diversity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book policy on inclusion and diversity. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50434 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/7a7541e722e0f8a7ea563f4bec622f1a.pdf 4916be639b169d54b063ac9e961a587c PDF Text Text 1 September 22, 200 I Memo to: C. David Campbell, Chair and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Maureen H. Smyth, Chair, CMF Nominating Committee Re: New Trustees for the Class of2003 and 2004 The Nominating Committee met in August and September via Conference Call to review the five vacancies occurring in the Board of Trustees. After much discussion we have presented three outstanding individuals to the membership for the Class of2004: • • • Betsy Upton Stover of Lansing, Associate Trustee, Frederick S Upton Foundation, St. Joseph Sandra E. Ulsh, Vice President and Executive Director, Ford Motor Company Fund, Dearborn Patricia Reynolds, President, Capital Region Community Foundation, Lansing These new nominees replace Lynn Feldhouse, who has retired from the DaimlerChrylser Corporation Fund, Neeta Delaney, who has announced that she is leaving the Jackson County Community Foundation in February, and Maureen Smyth, Vice President- Programs, Charles Stewart Mon Foundation, who has served the full three terms and is ineligible to continue as a trustee. We are delighted that the following six trustees have agreed to serve again: • C. David Campbell, President, McGregor Fund, Detroit • Allan D. Gibnuur, President, The Gilmour fund, Detroit • Ann K. Irish., President & Trustee, The Elizabeth Kennedy Fund, Harbor Springs • William C. Richardson, President, W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek • Olivia P. Maynard of Goodrich, Trustee, Les C heneaux Area Community Foundation, Cedarville • S. Martin Taylor, President, DTE Energy Foundation, Detroit There are two vacancies in the C lass of2003. James Greene from Pharmacia in Kalamazoo has indicated that he is retiring effective October 31 ,2001 and Ralph Gerson from Guardian Industries has indicated that the pace of his travel makes it difficult to serve. Both men have submitted resignations effective October 31 , 200 I. We will recognize all five of these trustees at the Board Meeting on October 31 and the Annual Members Meeting on November I. To complete the two-year terms we are pleased to reco mmend two distinguished individuals: • Rober1 Aronson, Assistant to the Chairman of Guardian Industries, Auburn Hills. Bob oversees the philanthropy of William Davidson, CMFs Annua I Conference honoree the last time we were in Detroit, and he serves as Chief Executive Ofiicer oftl1e Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detro it. • J. Louis Felton, Trustee of the Kalamazoo Community Foundation s ince 1998. Reve rend Felton also serves as Pastor o f the Galilee Missionary Baptist Church. Assuming these recommendations meet with your approval, we would like to invite each of them to attend the October 3 1 Board Meeting and November I Annual Meeting as our guests. Their first official Board meeting is February 19, 2002. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Nominating-Committee-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book nominating committee report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book nominating committee report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50433 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/7dd9db07afca4d418fd59e757037729c.pdf c97432fed72e8d4519df33673b72ab51 PDF Text Text October 24, 200 1 Memo to: C. David Campbell, Chair and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Maureen H. Smyth, Chair, Nominating Committee Re: New Trustees for the Class of 2003 and 2004 I am pleased to report that, based on ballots returned to CMF, the membership has elected the following trustees to the Class of 2004. • C. David Campbell, President, McGregor Fund, Detroit • • • • Allan D. Gilmour, President, The Gilmour Fund, Detroit Ann K. Irish, President & Trustee, The Elizabeth Kennedy fund, Harbor Springs William C. Richardson, President, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Battle Creek Olivia P. Maynard of Goodrich, Trustee, Les Cheneaux Area Community Foundation, Cedarville S. Martin Taylor, President, DTE Energy Foundation, Detroit Betsy Upton Stover of Lansing, Associate Trustee, Frederick S. Upton Foundation, St. Joseph Sandra E. Ulsh, Vice President and Executive Director, Ford Motor Company Fund, Dearborn Patricia Reynolds, President, Capital Region Community Foundation, Lansing • • • • The election will be announced at the Annual Members Meeting on November 1 at 11:30 a.m. Congratulations to all! As you know, our October 31 Board Meeting w ill be the fmal meeting for Ralph Gerson and James Greene. The Nominating Committee presents the following two individuals as candidates for Board appointment to complete their two-year terms. • Robert Aronson, Assistant to the Chairman of Guardian Industries, Auburn Hills. Bob oversees the philanthropy of William Davidson, Chairman of Guardian and a past CMF Honorary Conference Chair. He also serves as Chief Executive Officer of the Jewish Federation of Metropolitan Detroit. • Reverend J. Lewis Felton is Pastor of the Galilee Missionaty Baptist Church in Kalamazoo and has served as Trustee of the Kalamazoo Community Foundation since 1998. RESOLVED that Robert Aronson and J. Lewis Felton be each appointed to serve twoyear terms as members of the Board of Trustees Class of 2003. We look forward to welcoming these five new Trustees and to introducing them to our Members on November 1! � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Nominating-Committee-New-Trustees Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book nominating committee new trustees Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book nominating committee new trustees. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50432 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/fa4b4e9ecc4fb58917ba9e21fd1eb1bf.pdf 9ccaa4cca8487a03880bbc01f54c919f PDF Text Text October 22, 200 I Memo to: C. David Campbell, Chair and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Leonard Smith, MAF Chair Glen Jack, MAF Executive Director Re: 2001 Annual Report Michigan AIDS Fund Michigan AIDS Fund A decade of compassion. A new era of hope. Mission To help reduce the spread and alleviate the suffering caused by HIV/AIDS by serving as an intermediary support organization between philanthropy and HlV/AIDS organizations and those affected by the epidemic in Michigan. Board of Trustees Leonard W. Smith, Chair Ira Strumwasser, Vice Chair Susan K. Broman, Treasurer Frederick W. Bryant, Secretary Robert S. Collier Carolee Dodge Francis Elan Garonzik Barbara J. Getz A. James Heynen Eric JirgensBarbara Jones Jay Kaplan Glenn F. Kossick Judith D. Rumelhatt Elizabeth C. Sullivan David K. Swenson Terri D. Wright Mary Fisher, honorary trustee Since it was formed by a group of grantmakers in 1989, the Michigan AIDS Fund (MAF) has distributed more than $6 million from 100 plus grantmakers in funding and resources to block the spread ofHlV/AIDS in Michigan. It has supported programs with demonstrable success such as peer education, outreach to runaways, homeless and incarcerated youth, and testing and counseling for women. MAF exceeded its fundraising goal for the year and awarded grants totaling $614,297 to 21 organizations located throughout the state. Four examples of these grants are: $8,400 to Community AIDS Benefit Services in Kalamazoo $ 10,000 to the Keweenaw Bay Indian Community in Baraga $16,000 to Alternatives for Girls in Detroit $17,000 to Wellness Networks- Grand Traverse Area in Traverse City As a result of a Strategic Planning process, the Board of MAF determined that it was time for the organization to become fully independent with its own Executive Director, aft.er ten years of nurturing from the Greystone Group in Grand Rapids. After a search process, Glen Jack statted on January I as Executive Director, and he opened MAF's new office in Southfield in May. The Board bas appointed Jim Heynen, President of the Greystone Group, to a vacant seat. �The work of the Michigan AIDS Fund continues because: there are at least 1, 100 new .infections every year in our state; nearly 6,000 residents have died from AIDS, at least 13,000 neighbors and friends are living with the disease in Michigan. �Michigan AIDS Fund Board of Trustees Terms of Office The Bylaws allow for a Board of up to 17 members Class of 2001 - 2004 -(6) • Elizabeth Sullivan, Kresge Foundation • Rob Collier, Council of Michigan Foundations • Gerald Smith, Detroit Youth Foundation • David Swenson, Saginaw Community Foundation • Dr. Nora Maloy, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation • Larry Washington, Dow Chemical Company Class of 2003 - (5) • Susan Broman, Steelcase Foundation • Carolee Dodge Francis, Dickinson County Community Foundation • Barbara Jones, City of Detroit Health Department • Jay Kaplan, Michigan AIDS Alliance • Terri D. Wright, W. K. Kellogg Foundation Class of 2002 - (6) • Dr. Fred Bryant, Michigan State Medical Society • Elan Garonzik, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation • James Heyen, Charles Anthony Foundation • Eric Jirgens, The Gilmour Fund/Community Foundation of Southeastem Michigan • Judith Rummelhart, Harry A. & Margaret D. Towsley Foundation • Leonard W. Smith, The Flinn Family Foundation � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Michigan-AIDS Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book Michigan AIDS Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book Michigan AIDS. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50431 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/91fbb31320c9a3cc8fa5526df7014775.pdf b3846588e7703016dc4cc75a1844da1d PDF Text Text October 22, 2001 Memo To: C. David Campbell, Chair and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Rob Collier, President, and Vicki Rosenberg, COO RE: Recommendations on Diversity & Inclusion, Positioning Statement and Strategic Plan Update DIVERSITY & INCLUSION Introduction At the October 2nd Special Board Meeting, Trustees engaged in a brief, but lively, discussion about diversity and inclusion, facilitated by Bob Tobin our strategic planning consultant. Although time did not permit a full exploration of these issues, there was consensus about the need to strengthen CMF's commitment to these values, both in principle and practice. To begin this process, the Board asked staff to: • • Expand the definition of "diversity" presented at the meeting; Prepare a draft value statement with implementation plan for discussion at the October 31, 2001 Board meeting; and The following expanded definitions are presented for your consideration. Diversity is men and women from different nations, ethnicities, races, and cultures, of different generations, religions, backgrounds, and sexual orientations, and with different skills, abilities, lifestyles, and beliefs. Inclusion: An environment where everyone has an opportunity to fully participate and is valued for the distinctive skills, experiences, and perspectives they bring to this environment. Action Item The following items are presented for discussion and approval: RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve the following values statement: We Strive for Diversity & Inclusion-in our staff, our membership, our Board and our activities. Our goal is to understand the range of philanthropic perspectives held and traditions followed by our members and to share those with grantmakers through our programs and publications. By diversity, we �Diversity & Inclusion Memo to the Board of Trustees Page 2 mean men and women of all cultures, ethnicities, lifestyles, ages, beliefs, backgrounds, skills and abilities, races, and sexual orientations. We encourage members to join with us by developing their own commitment to diversity and inclusion for the future of philanthropy in Michigan. Based on the discussion of the above resolution, staff would move forward as follows: • • • Gather data through focus groups and interviews with selected members to identify areas of concern, desired outcomes, and suggested actions. Present the results of the data gathering effort to the expanded Long-Range Planning Committee for discussion and recommendation. Present the final action plan to the Board for review and action. POSITIONING STATEMENT At the October 2 Special Board Meeting, three possible positioning statements were presented: • Advancing Charitable Giving • Supporting (Creating/Advancing) A Culture of Giving • Advancing the State of Charitable Giving (Philanthropy) Wbtm lht: vult: was lakt:n, "Supporting a Cullurt: ufGiving" haJ lht: must vutt:s but nut from a majority of Trustees present. The discussion reminded us of our servant leadership role, and we returned to the Marketing/Communications Task Force for more discussion. The Committee has spent more time on this and considers "Serving Givers, Advancing Giving" as an alternative. There is some concern, however, that using the word givers is too similar to the United Way. It has been recommended that the word grantmakers replace givers for the statement to read " Serving Grantmakers, Advancing Giving." If the Board feels comfortable with this recommendation, a motion to adopt it as the Positioning statement is in order. If not we would recommend referring this matter back to the Marketing/Task Force for more discussion with Bob Tobin our consultant. STRATEGIC PLAN UPDATE At the October 2"d meeting, the Board approved expanding the Long-Range Planning Committee (LRPC) to include its original members (Executive Cornn1ittee and Collier, Fischer, Katt, Lindberg, and Rosenberg) plus Task Force and Committee chairs (Neeta Delaney, Gil Hudson, Libby Maynard, and Elizabeth Sullivan), and staff (Judy Carl, Susan Howbert, Donnell Merseareau, and Gail Powers-Schaub). The goal of this expanded group will be to provide leadership on the integration of the Phase II recommendations into a comprehensive plan for CMF's future. The Committee's final recommendations will inform the work of the Marketing -Communications and Technology Task Forces. �Diversity & Inclusion Memo to the Board of Trustees Page 3 The next steps to complete the strategic plan are as follows: • • • • • November: Consolidation o f Phase II Recommendations into draft Strategic Plan December: Meeting of Expanded Long-Range Planning Committee to: review and make recommendations on final strategic plan including revised vision metrics (implementation benchmarks), implementation timeline, and instructions for Marketing-Communications & Technology Task Forces. Preparation of CMF FY02 Budget Meeting of Marketing-Communications Task Force. January: Presentation of FY02 Budget to Finance Committee. Market research with corporate members conducted. Meeting of Technology Task Force February: Meeting of Marketing-Communications Task Force Presentation of Budget and Final Plan to Board Meeting of Technology Task Force April I : Implementation of Strategic Plan begins. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Memo-to-Board Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book memo to board Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book memo to board. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50430 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/4ab0cc3d921f92fdb79105acd8fa5276.pdf 00b2a287774bd3af351d3b273ac6d23a PDF Text Text October 19, 2001 Memo to: C. David Campbell, Chair and Board of Trustees From: Gilbert Hudson, Chair, Membership Committee Re: Membership Report I. Total of Approved Members as of 5/11/01 491 II. Applications for Membership received since 5/ll/01 +10 III. Approved Application and Termination at 5/11/01 Meeting Family Foundation Application: Clannad Foundation, Wilmington, NC Annie West Graham, Recording Secretary Corporate Giving Program Termination: Ernst & Young, Grand Rapids (not using CMF services/no longer has nonprofit clients) N. Applications since May 11, 2001 -- 10 Family Foundation: M. E. Davenport Foundation, Grand Rapids Kathleen M. Sneden, President The Glancy Foundation, St. Clair Shores Alfred R. Glancy III, Chairman Mackey Foundation, Grand Blanc Bruce Mackey, Secretary Sid Mittra & Bani Mittra Family Foundation, Rochester Hills Sid Mittra, President Werner & Ruth Nartel Foundation, Grand Blanc Evelyn Nartelski, Vice President Sage Foundation, Brighton John J. Ayaub, Secretary Amherst & Janeth Turner Foundation, Ann Arbor Janeth Turner, President Independent Foundation: Scofield Memorial Scholarship Foundation, Battle Creek Michael C. Jordan, Attorney Out-of-State Associate: �Membership Report October 19,2001 Page 2 Community Foundation of St. Joseph County, South Bend, IN Rose Meissner, President �Membership Report October 19,2001 Page 2 Applications since May 11, 2001 continued: Public Foundation: Grand Rapids Jaycees Foundation, Grand Rapids Martin J. Hillard, President V. - 6 Memberships Terminated After 5/11/01 Ave Maria Foundation (Unresponsive. Single purpose operating foundation.) Detroit Tigers (Tigers Care program) (no longer operating a grantmak in g program) The J. Paul Getty Trust (closed Michigan office) International Youth Foundation (no grantmaking in Michigan) SPX Foundation (company sold; moved out of state) Wigginton Educational Foundation (Single purpose; donor deceased & relationsh ip void) Total Membership as of 10/19/01 VI. Current membership composition is as follows: Private: Family Foundations Independent Foundations 56@ 11% 38@ 8% 5@ 1% Corporate: Foundations Giving Programs 32@ 7% 4 1@ 8% Public: Out-of-State Associate: Private Foundations Community Foundation Individual Philanthrop ist: VII. 287 58% 99 20% 73 15% 30 6% 4 1% 2 495 0% 100% 220@44% 67@ 14% Community: Foundations Affiliates Donor-Advised Funds Foundations Donor-Advised Funds 495 28@ 6% 2@ -0- 3@ 1% 1@ -02@ -0495 100% Total new members since 4/1/01 17 �Membership Report October 19,2001 Page 2 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Membership-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book membership report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book membership report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50429 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/607f28618b15cc17906588177199bcb6.pdf 317f191855c44c02e77bc5cc74c63de1 PDF Text Text 33 Date: September 24. 2001 Memo To: Dave Campbell, Chairman and Board ofTrustees From: Gil Hudson, Chairman, Membership Committee Re: Work of the Membership Committee The Membership Committee is meeting on September 28 and has an ambitious agenda. The following list highlights issues being tackled by the Committee, and we hope to present many of these issues to you for discussio n and action on October 2. • • • • • • To redefine Community Foundation Affiliates and revoke voting privileges, To grandfather the current four members in the Community Foundation Donor Advised Funds category and eliminate the category, To adopt a Membership Development Plan for 2002, including delinquent members and those not contributing at the recommended dues level , To set a membership goal of578 by 2006 targeting Independent and Family Foundations with assets exceeding $1 million, To agree on core member benefits, and To discuss a dues increase for 2002, including an expansion of dues categories Background The chart that follows this memo summarizes all of the membership categories. The Community Foundation Committee has recommended the actions noted above concerning Affiliates and Donor Advised Funds. CMF has about 65 members that are more than two years delinquent in paying dues The Committee will be discussing strategies for renewing their membership by March 31 , 2002 with a recommendation to drop non-responsive members as members effective April I, 2002. At the same time, we look forward to involving all Trustees in the Membership Development Plan for 2002. Staff is recommending to the Committee that there are sufficient non-members above one million dollars in assets in the independent and family foundation groups to meet the five-year goal of 578 As CMF develops its first marketing brochure, it is necessary to define core membership benefits. Also following this memo is a list of member benefits the Committee is discussing. Finally, it has been six years since CMF increased member dues. Inflation has increased by at least 18% in that time, and coupled with other economic factors, this is an issue that needs to be discussed. �li1 EM8EI\SIIIP CRITERIA '<T M Memb. Category Catcgor} Ocfinition Communny Foundations Community foundation Affiliate Communrty foundation Donor Advised fund Supponmg Organizations Community foundation A communny foundation is a tax-exempt public charit} organized and operated as a permanent collection of endowed funds for the long-term benefit of a defined geogrophic area. A community foundation afliliate is organrzed and operated as a permanent endowment for the long-tenn benefit of a defi ned geographic area that may have its own 501 0 (3) status. A community foundation donor advised fund is held by a community foundation where the donor, or a commiuee appointed by the donor, may recommend eligible charitable recipients for grants from the fund The community foundation's governing body must be free to accept or reject the recommendations. A supponing organization is a charity that is not required to meet the public suppon test because it suppons a community foundation. To be a supponing organization, a charity muSI meet one of three complex legal tests that assure, at a minimum, that the organization being supponed has some inOuence over the actions of the supponing o rganization. Supponing organizations are distinguishable from donor advised funds because the) are distinct legal entities. (No Definition) Corporate foundations Corporate Grving Programs, Non-Consultant Corporate Giving Programs, Consultant Service Business Friends or CMf Individual Philanthropists Out-OtcState Associate Private foundations Family Private foundations Independent Private Foundations Operating Public foundations ~lojor Revoke Voting Privilege Ehmmote A corporate giving (direct giving) program IS a grantmaking program established and adminiSiered within a profit-making company. Gifts or grants go directly to charitable organizations from the corporation. Corporate giving programs do not have a separate endowment; their expense is planned as pan of the company's annual budgeting process and usually is funded with pre-tax income. A consultant service business corporate giving (direct grving) program is a grantmaking program administered within profit-making companies, such as law firms, financial services and agencies. Gifts or grants go directly to charitable organiz.Gtions from the corponuion. Corporate giving programs do not have a !tt:pardte endowment. Retired grantmakers who have been associated with CMf, but are no longer afliliated wrth a CMf member. Individuals whose giving is done in an organized, systematic manner and who can evidence a ;ignificant degree of commonality with other Cf members. A foundation whose headquaners is located m a state other th3ll Michigan. A family foundation is one whose funds are derived from members of a smgle family. Famrly members represent the majority of the board, and control the board. Trustees usually serve on a voluntary basis, receiving no compensation; in many cases, second- and third-generation descendants of the original donors manage the foundation. Most family foundations concentrate their giving locally, in their communities. Independent toundations are usually founded by one individual, often by bequest. The members from the founding family, ifany, represent a minority of the board Md do not control the board. Many large independent foundations are no longer governed by members of the original donor's fam il), but are run by boards made up of community, business and academic leaders. Independent foundat.ions are occasionally termed "non-operating" because they do not run their own programs. An operating foundation is a private foundation that uses the bulk of its income to provide charitable services or to run charitable programs of its own It makes few. if any, grants to outside organizauons To quahfy as an operating foundation, specific rules, rn addition to the applicable rules for private foundallons. must be followed. Public foundations are recognrzed as public charities by the IRS. Although they may provide direct charitable services to the public as other nonprofits do, their primary focus is on grantmaking. Changes I �Momb. Ca rc~:ory Public Foundation Donor Advised Fund Supponmg Organizations Public Charity Cu rc~or} Odinilio n A public foundation donor advised fund is held b) a public toundation where rhe donor, or a committee appointed by the donor, may recommend eligible charitable recipients for grants from the fund The public foundation's governing bod) must be free to accept or reJect the recommendations A supponing organization is a charity that is not required to meet the public suppon test because u suppons a public charity. To be a supponing organization, a c harity must meet one of the three complex legal tests that assurf, at a min unum, that the organization being supponed has some innuence over the actions of the supponing organization. Supponing organizations are distinguishable from donor-advised funds because the~ are distinct legal entities. 1\lnjor Changes �36 Benefits of Membership Benefits provided to members for dues include: • Resources & Information Services: the monthly Memo to Members newsletter, the CMF website with its Members Only section, the quarterly The Michigan Scene magazine, constituency based newsletters including Yakety Yak for youth grantmakers, the Family Philanthropist, and newsletters for Community Foundations and Corporate givers, listserves for targeted member audiences, research services, a lending library, book buying, newclippings, mailing labels, sample documents, and resources and connections via the CMF website. • Advocacy with State and Federal Officials: periodic interaction, testimony to Committees, assistance drafting legislation, special issue briefings and reports, and public-private partnerships. In some instances, CMF conducts its advocacy work in partnership with MNA or other organizations. • Convening/Facilitating: affinity group meetings for Michigan K -1 2 Education Funders group, Land Use Funders, etc; regional members meetings (spring regional members meeting, Detroit Area Grantmak.ers); special topic meetings (Philanthropy and the Media with Dot Ridings from COF), users groups (First Pearl software) and special meetings as requested by members (devolution). • Leadership with the Nonprofit Community via collaborations and serving as an intermediary: partnerships with MNA (Grantmaker/Grantseeker Biennial Conference), the Michigan Community Service Commission, Family Independence Agency (IDA Partnership), Michigan State Housing Development Authority (Homeless Prevention), Michigan AIDS Fund, the Tobacco Settlement (healthy youth and seniors), and the Great Lakes Collaborative (environmental protection). • Project Facilitation for member driven programs such as City Connect Detroit. • Technical Assistance: funder searches (for members and for grantees of members), accounting, administrative, and legal assistance, investment advisory, common grant forms, speech writing, meeting and retreat facilitation, assistance to members' consultants, board training. • Services/Group Benefits: Directors & Officers Liability insurance, group health (pending), the Detroit Office, and possibly others. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Membership-Committee-Work Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book membership committee work Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book membership committee work. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50428 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/f865f7b5ab4cfbe244d1bdd1b1a648bc.pdf aab07013c772b04d205727e425e1d552 PDF Text Text Date: October 1, 2001 To: Board ofTrustees From: Gil Hudson, Chair Membership Committee Re: Membership Recommendations The Membership Committee met on Friday, September 28, 2001 to review membership category definitions and criteria, membership retention and recruitment and dues. The following action items are presented for discussion and approval: RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve the following changes in membership criteria as endorsed by the Membership Committee and recommended by the Community Foundation Committee where appropriate: • Modify the criteria for Community Foundations to reflect the current state law for community foundations eligible for the community foundation tax credit. • Redefine Community Foundation Affiliate to be limited to those participating in the Kellogg Youth Challenge and to further revoke their voting privileges as a CMF member. • Eliminate the category of Community Foundation Donor Advised Fund by grandfathering current members and closing the category to new members. • Eliminate the category of "Friends" of CMF. • Change the language in the Out-of-State Associates criteria from " must" to "should" have a grantmakiog presence in Michigan. • Amend the criteria for Public Foundations to include "have a permanent endowment" and "make substantial grants for broad charitable purposes." RESOLVED further that a policy be approved to terminate membership for nonresponsive members that ar·e more than two years delinquent on membership dues. RESOLVE D further that the Membership Development Plan/Campaign for 2002, including the goal of 578 by 200617 be approved. RESOLVED further that minimum dues be established at a level of $500 and that the dues categories be expanded with a dues increase to be considered by the Finance Committee as the budgets are prepared for 2002 and beyond. �Background There was consensus by the Committee that we can have "Friend ofCMF" without making it a distinct membershlp category. Attached is the Retention Plan to deal with the current 66 delinquent members. It is important to note that we may drop as many as 50 members by implementing the recommended policy in 2002. Also attached is the proposed Membership Development Plan for 2002. We look forward to your participation. The most desirable targets for membership are the 99 Independent and 2 15 Family foundations with assets of $1 million or more. It costs CMF $495 to service each member. A review of existing membership dues indicates that $500 is the common minimum. We presently have 107 members that pay dues at the level of$150 or $360. In making the recommendation to raise the minimum dues level to $500, we recognize that CMF may lose some of these members. ljfiscberBoarcJ9.28 ..() I membershiprecommendatioo.s �Retention Strategies Several membership retention strategies are recommended. By implementing these and other strategies being developed by the Phase ll Strategic Planning Task Forces, delinquencies can be significantly minimized and member satisfaction increased thereby reducing the number of voluntary non-renewals. Those suggested strategies are as follows. The status of each strategy (continue, expand, or add) is also indicated. • Track individual members' membership history (including records of key contacts on status of membership, dues, etc.), participation in programs, use of services, and purchases of reports and other products to support more personalized service. (expand) • Make personal contact with each member annually to ask about their satisfaction with CMF services and to solicit feedback about their needs. Every other year, make this contact through a visit to the foundation's offices. (expand) • Send new members a welcome letter, a membership packet describing CMF programs, products, and services available to members, invitations to serve on committees within eight weeks of membership initiation, and, per recommendations forthcoming from the Services Task Force, assign a "member buddy" or mentor to new members from among active, current members in the same membership category. (expand) • Feature new members in Memo to Members. (add) • Provide new members with a special orientation at the annual conference. (continue) • Contact new members at least twice during their first year of membership to highJight services. (add) • Feature renewing members in publications through stories on best practices, quotes, and special mentions on five-year membership anniversaries (I 0, 15, 20, etc.). (expand) • Contact non-renewing members to encourage them to renew, and, if unsuccessful, to determine reasons for termination. (continue) ** Additional strateg ies will be forthcoming from Strategic Planning task forces. �Membership Development Campaign: 2002 The proposed 2002 Membership Development Plan has three steps: 1) identification of potential members; 2) working with recruitment volunteers; and 3) staff reporting and recruitment. These are described more fully below. Identifying Potential Members CMF uses reports published by the IRS and the Foundation Center to identify potential new members. Both sources publish reports identifying newly established foundations and providing contact and asset information for each. The IRS report is published quarterly. The Foundation Center report is made available to CMF upon publication of its Michigan Foundation Directory, a biennial publication. In December of each year, CMF's Director of Membership and Special Projects conducts research and develops a target list of potential members for distribution to the Membership Committee and recruitment volunteers (Membership Committee and the Board). Specific steps in the campaign are as follows: • January-- IRS and the Foundation Center reports reviewed to identify CMF eligible foundations not currently members ofCMF. These include established and newly formed family and independent foundations. Staff do targeted mailing to eligible family foundations that includes a special invitation letter and a copy of The Family Philanthropist newsletter. • February-o A chart showing all eligible candidates for membership with foundation name, contact person, address, city, and asset information is presented to the Membership Committee for review and discussion; o Board members and general members are recruited as volunteers to help with development effort; o Volunteers select candidates they will contact from the chart discussed above; o Each volunteer is provided with the list of candidates s/he has offered to contact along with a summary of prior contacts, a brief description of each eligib le fou ndations' characteristics (type, asset size, year formed, etc.), a timeline for making contact, and key points to discuss with potential members; o Membership Committee members are encouraged to recruit 3 new members, Board members to recruit I to 2 new members, and volunteers from the general membership to recruit I new member. • March/ April --The Director ofMembership & Special Projects carefully monitors the recruitment effort, contacting each recruitment volunteer to check on progress, offer assistance, etc. Immediately following each successful invitation, the Director follows up with a phone call and letter to the new member. �• May - Recruit ment volunteer work completed. Recruitment records are updated for future recruitment (who contacted, how many times, how and what were results-- comments, for example, "not ready, please re-contact in six months.") For future campaigns, CMF will develop new marketing materials informed by recommendations forthcoming from the Marketing-Communications Task Force. The following is a sample of the format previously used to track recruitment by membership committee volunteers. This format allows for reporting on the progress of each volunteer, as well as each foundation. COUNCIL OF MICIDGAN FOUNDATIONS 2002 Membership Campaign Contact Activity Form CMFMember Membership Candidate Date of Last Contact Who Contacted and Method of Last ContactLetter, Phone, Visit Notes, Follow-up Plan and Deadline �MEMBERSHIP CRITERIA Memb. Cate~or) Category Definition Communi!) Foundauons Communi!\ Foundatiot; Affiltatc A commwtity foundation is a ta.x..:xempt public charity organized and operated as a permanent collection of endowed funds for the long-tcnn benefit of a dcfmed geographic area. A communi!) foundation affiliate, served by a lead community foundation, is organized and operated as a permanent endowment for the long-term benefit of a defined geographic area that has recerved funds through the CMF-W.K. Kellogg Foundation Youth Challenge. A communi!)• foundation donor advised fund is held by a community foundation where the donor, or a committee appointed by the donor, may recommend eligible charitable recipients for grants from the fund. The community foundation's aovemina body must be free to accept or re'ect the recommendations. A supporting organization is a charity that is not required to meet the public support test because it supports a community foundation. To be a supporting organization. a charity must meet one of three complex legal tests that assure, at a minimum, that the organization being supported has some influence over the actions of the supporting organization. Supporting organizations a.re distinguishable from donor advised funds because they arc distinct legru entities. A corporate (company-sponsored) foundation is a private foundation that derives its grantrnaking funds pnmanly from the contributions of a profit-making business. The company-sponsored foundation often maintains close ties with the donor company, but it is a separate, legal organization, sometimes with its own endowment, and is subject to the same rules and re~n~lations as other private foundations. A corporate giling (direct giving) program is a grantmaldng program established and admirtistered within a profit-making company. Gifts or grants go directly to charitable organizations from the corporation. Corporate giving programs do not have a separate endowment; their expense is planned as part of the company's annual budgeting process and usually is funded with pre-tax income. A consultant service business corporate giving (direct giving) program is a grantmaking program administered 11ithin profit-making companies, such as law firms, financial services and agencies. Gills or grants go directly to charitable orgamzations from the corporation. Corporate giving programs do not have a separate endowment. Reured grantmakers who have been associated with CMF. but are no longer affiliated witlt a CMF member. lndl1iduals whose giving is done in an organized, systematic manner and who can evidence a significant degree of commonality with other CMF members. A foundation whose headquarters is located in a state other than Michigan. Communi!) Foundation Donor Ad1·ised Fund Supporting Organizations Commumt) Foundation Corporate Foundations Corporate Gi1 rng Programs, Non-Consultant Corporate Gi1 ing Programs. Consultant Ser~ tce Business Fnends of CMF lndilidual Philanthroprsts Out-Of-State Associate Pnvate Foundations Family Pnvate Foundations Indcpenden t Private Foundations Operating A famrly foundation is one whose funds arc derived from members of a single family. Family members represent the majority of the board, and control tlte board. Trustees usually setve on a voluntary basis, recei1ing no compensation; in man) cases, second- and third-generation descendants of the original donors manage the foundation. Most family foundations concentrate their giving locally, in their communities. Independent foundations are usually founded by one individual, often by bequest. The members from the founding family, if any, represent a minority of the board and do not control the board. Many large independettt foundations are no longer governed by members of the original donor's family, but are run by boards made up of commumty. business and academic leaders. Independent foundations are oceasionally termed •non-operating' because they do not run their own programs. An operating foundation is a private foundation that uses the bulk of its income to provide charitable services or to run chantable programs of its own. It makes few, if any, grants to outside organizations. To qualify as an operating foundation, specific rules, in addition to the applicable rules for private foundations, must be followed. Major Ch anges Re•·oke Voting Privilege Eliminate Eliminate ·- �35 ,---- Mcmb. CateAor·~ Category Definition Public Foundauons Pubhe Foundauon Donor Advtscd Fund Supporttng Organwuions Pubhc Chant) Public foundations arc recognized as pubhc chanties by the IRS Al~tough they may provide direct charitable se" tees to tbe pubhc as other nonprofits do, their primary focus is on gmntmaking. A pubhc foundation donor advised fund is held by a public foundatJon where the donor. or a committee appomtcd b} the donor, may recommend eligible charitable recipients for grants from ~le fund. The public foundation's governing body must be free to accept or reject the recommendations. A supporting organization is a charity that is not required to meet the public support test because it suppons a pubhc chanty. To be a supporting organization. a charity must meet one of the three complex legal tests that assure. at a minimwn. that the organl7.ation being supported bas some influence over the actions of the supporting orgaruzation. Supporting organizations arc distinguishable from donor-ad\ ised funds because they arc dtstinct legal entities. Major Changes � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Membership-Committee-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book membership committee report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book membership committee report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50427 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/cf3dcc67e1e6f9d1ba6a53913bded9ea.pdf f919e38b20166d40b49e90a3113214dd PDF Text Text Jllli ACTION Of' Tl1fl HeART A I"ROJSCT FORTH£ HIND Date: October 16, 2001 To: Council of Michigan Foundations Board of Trustees From: Dr. Russell G. Mawby, Chairman, Learning to Give C. David Campbell, Steering Committee Member Julie F. Cummings, Steering Committee Member Dorothy A. Johnson, Steering Committee Member RobertS. Collier, Steering Committee Member Re: Learning to Give Update Lilly Endowment Grant The Lilly Endowment has granted $1 million over two years (2002-2004) to Learning to Give (LTG) to support the national launch of LTG to five demonstration states (Michigan, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Texas and California), and to add depth and breadth to the Web-site. This grant was made in anticipation of a companion grant of $900,000 from The Atlantic Philanthropies. A decision from The Atlantic Philanthropies is pending. In addition, CMF has been working to secure federal funding through the national education budget. If this funding is authorized and appropriated as planned, an additional four states will be added to the demonstration pool {Ohio, Wisconsin, Florida, and New Hampshire). If neither The Atlantic Philanthropies nor the federal funding are secured, the Lilly Endowment will entertain a revised work plan. LTG should know about funding over the next few months. Michigan Department of Education At the request of the Michigan Department of Education, twelve units (three at each grade level) have been placed on the MOE web-site in support of the Child 2 Child campaign launched by the department to help children affected by the recent terrorist attacks on the United States. The lessons and LTG are very prominently displayed on the site. The lessons speak to service and sacrifice for the benefit of the community, and also to tolerance in a diverse society. I 0-16-0 l Report �Detroit Free Press Article The Detroit Free Press published an article and a picture of the students learning lessons on philanthropy at VanZile Elementary school of the Detroit Public Schools. A copy of the out-state version of the article, which was almost the full front page of the People Section, is enclosed. National Partnerships and Endorsements National partnerships with nonprofit umbrella organizations, and endorsements from national educational organizations have been secured. The list of partners and endorsers follows at the end. There will be a meeting of the partners and endorsers in Washington, sometime in the early winter. LTG will work with and through the national partners in order to disseminate philanthropy education nationwide. National Content Advisory Committee A National Content Advisory Committee of scholars and reflective practitioners has been selected. Through the support of The Fetzer Institute, the committee will meet once a year for three years to review and enhance the philanthropy education content. A list of the members follows. Nine of the scholars represent each of the universities that are considering working with LTG as the lead institution in their state for dissemination. The committee will meet for the first time October 24, 25, and 261h at Season's on the campus of The Fetzer Institute. Progress Report Philanthropy Themes and Benchmarks These are scheduled for review by the National Content Advisory Committee. Units, Lessons, and Assessment Over 300 lessons are on the LTG Web-site. Almost 100 additional lessons were written this summer. By spring 2002, over 500 lessons are expected to be posted on the site. We are very close to having a sample lesson for each of the philanthropy benchmarks, and also a sample philanthropy lesson that meets the Michigan Education Assessment Program (MEAP) benchmarks for social studies. The assessment test questions have been reviewed by the Fairness Committee. By spring sample questions will be available on the Web-site for teachers to download to create their own tests, or they may use a sample test developed by LTG. A valid standardized test will not be available for a few more years. Pilot and Demonstrations Schools Almost 30 schools have committed a building to teaching two philanthropy units each year at every grade level for at least three years. Two school systems, Muskegon Catholic Central and Muskegon Mona Shores, have committed their districts K-12 and all buildings. The pilot schools will participate in the evaluation research of LTG being led by Michigan State University. This includes formal �field-testing of lessons, completion of teacher and student surveys, teacher journals, three de-briefing meetings each year, and submission of all philanthropy student work. The list of pilot schools follows. We are still recruiting a Detroit Public Schools High School. In addition, several schools have asked to be demonstration sites. These schools are committed to teaching the units at each grade level, but they will not be participating in the research study because more than enough schools have already volunteered for the research. A final list of demonstration schools will be available by mid-year, many are in the final decision stages. Teacher Support Materials Briefing Papers Twenty-one new graduate student produced briefing papers were received in the spring. They are in the final editing process and will be placed on the Web shortly. This brings the total number of papers to forty. The first literature briefs have been received, analyzing the relationship of the books: My Antonia, Great Expectations, The Grapes of Wrath, and The Education of Little Tree, to LTG philanthropy themes. High School CD ROM and Textbook Supplement The outline has been completed for some time. We are awaiting a decision from the Association of Fund-Raising Professionals foundation regarding matching the Charles Stewart Mott Foundation challenge grant for this new resource. Professional Development Masters Degree in Education with a Philanthropy Endorsement The online M.A. in Education with a philanthropy concentration is well underway in partnership with Ferris State University. There will be two summer residential sessions for 12 credit hours held in Grand Rapids, which are required to meet the university accreditation requirements for offering a Masters Degree. The other 24 credit hours will be available online. In addition, a certificate in philanthropy will be available for people who do not wish to have the M.A. or the teaching certification, but are interested in the philanthropy content. With luck, the first summer residential session will be held during the summer of 2002. Summer Institutes Summer institutes, 2002, for teachers are planned in Michigan and Ohio, with the possibility of a third institute in New Hampshire. The Ohio Institute will be held again at the Mandel Center at Case Western Reserve. Dissemination and Publicity Web-site The Web-site continues to be developed. If the funding components fall into place the site will be enhanced by adding components for students, parents, and community leaders. Then the whole site will become more interactive. �Newsletters/Brochures The basic brochure has been reprinted, and is included for your use. Newsletters are produced bi-annually. The fall newsletter is due to be mailed in mid-November. National Publicity LTG has been recently mentioned or highlighted in: Foundation News and Commentary The Association Management Magazine Corporation for National Service online newsletter Conference Presentations Many school district and state presentations about LTG have been given. The larger groups include presentations completed or planned this fall: National Educational Computing Conference-Chicago Governor's Education Summit National Association of State Charity Officials-Baltimore Michigan Association of School Boards State Conference INDEPENDENT SECTOR-Atlanta (we will also have a booth) National Council for Social Studies-Washington Keynote speaker-Dan Moore from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Panel discussion-Kathy Agard from CMF/LTG Four workshop sessions by Michigan LTG teachers Michigan Association of Secondary School Principals-State Conference Women in Philanthropy Conference-Dallas Publications Learning to Give-Family Foundation booklet continues to sell well In final editing statesHandbook in philanthropy education for parents Handbook in philanthropy education for educators Handbook in philanthropy education for foundation program officers (These grow out of the parent involvement grant from the McGregor Foundation). The next Steering Committee meeting is scheduled for May, 2002. �Learning to Give Council of Michigan Foundations Pilot Schools Grade Level School Building School District Crowell Elementary (urban) Open School (urban) Maplewood Elementary (suburban) Churchill Elementary (suburban) Lincoln Park Elementary (suburban) Ross Park Elementary (suburban) St. Michael's Elementary (urban) Onekama Elementary (rural) Twin Lake Elementary (suburban) Barth Elementary (urban) Cory Elementary (urban) Hale Creek Elementary (urban) Merriman Elementary (urban) Romulus Elementary (urban) Wick Elementary (urban) Douglas Elementary (urban) Albion Public Schools Albion Public Schools Holland Public Schools Mona Shores Public Schools Mona Shores Public Schools Mona Shores Public Schools Muskegon Catholic Central Onekama Consolidated Reeths-Puffer Public Schools Romulus Public Schools Romulus Public Schools Romulus Public Schools Romulus Public Schools Romulus Public Schools Romulus Public Schools Saugatuck Public Schools Black River Public (urban)· Mona Shores Middle School (suburban) Muskegon Catholic Central Thurston Middle Schools (Suburban) Holland Charter School Mona Shores Public Schools Muskegon Catholic Central St. Charles Community Black River Public (urban) Mona Shores High School (suburban) Muskegon Catholic Central Holland Charter School Mona Shores Public Schools Muskegon Catholic Central Elementary Schools Middle Schools High Schools �Learning to Give Council of Michigan Foundations National Partnerships and Endorsements • • • • • • • • National Partnerships Association of Fund Raising Professionals Council on Foundations Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers Independent Sector National Center on Nonprofits and Philanthropy, The Urban Institute National Council for Social Studies National Council on Black Philanthropy National Council of Nonprofit Associations • • • • • • • • • • • • National Endorsements Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development (ASCD) Center for Civic Education Center for Partnership Studies Council of Great City Schools Educators for Social Responsibility National Alliance for Business-Business Coalition for Education Reform National Alliance of Black School Educators National Association of Elementary School Principals National Association of Secondary School Principals National Conference of State Legislatures National School Boards Association Social Science Education Consortium �Learning to Give Council of Michigan Foundations National Content Advisory Committee Chair: Eugene Tempel Executive Director Center on Philanthropy Indiana University Robert H. Bremner Professor of History Emeritus The John Glenn Institute Public Service and Public Policy Ohio State University Sarah Jane Rehnborg RGK Center for Philanthropy and Community Service LBJ School of Public Affairs University of Texas at Austin Grant Cioffi Associate Professor Department of Education University of New Hampshire Thomas H. Sander Executive Director The Saguaro SeminarCivic Engagement in America Harvard University John F. Kennedy School of Government Robin Douthitt Dean, School of Human Ecology Center for Women in Philanthropy University of Wisconsin-Madison JoMarie Goerge Program Officer The Fetzer Institute David Lawrence Jr. President Early Childhood Initiative Foundation Florida International University Wayne Muller Executive Director Bread for the Journey Brian O'Connell Professor of Public Service University College of Citizenship and Public Service Tufts University Lincoln Filene Center Joel Orosz Distinguished Professor in Philanthropy Dorothy A. Johnson Center on Philanthropy Grand Valley State University Marilyn Page Penn State University Frank E. Scott Assistant Professor of Public Administration Public Administration Program College of Behavioral and Social Sciences San Francisco State University Andrea Walton Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Indiana University Mark Wilson Associate Professor Geography/Urban and Regional Planning and Institute for Public Policy Research Michigan State University Ex Officio Russell G. Mawby Chairman, Learning to Give Chairman Emeritus W .K. Kellogg Foundaion RobertS. Collier President Council of Michigan Foundations Kathryn Ann Agard Executive Director, Learning to Give Council of Michigan Foundations Barbara Dillbeck Teacher-in-Residence, Learning to Give Council of Michigan Foundations �LESSON IN CARING: THE ABCS OF GIVING STUDENTS LEARN SOME OF THE BASICS OF PHILANTHROPY Detroit Free Press (MI) By JULIE ROSS FREE PRESS EDUCATION WRITER Date: October 4, 200 I; Page: I8 Edition: METRO FINAL; Section: NWS Illustration: Photo HUGH GRANN UM/Detroit Free Press Memo: AMERICA RESPONDS IN CLASSROOMS Teacher Ramona Purdy scrawled the word on a yellow strip of paper over the chalkboard and asked her two dozen students to define it. Philanthropy. Fil-an-thro-pee. A tough concept for adults, sure, but try it on fourth- and fifth-graders. Most stared blankly at the board inside Detroit's VanZile Elementary School. "Let's take ourselves back to the World Trade Center, when people came out to volunteer together for the common good," she said as she scribbled the definition underneath the yellow strip. "What were they giving? Their time, talent and treasure. "That's philanthropy," she said, "the giving of one's time, talent or treasure." Schools, to varying degrees, have for years taught the hows and whys of helping others, but the character lessons have taken on a new importance after last month's ten·orist attacks. Now the state is renewing interest by promoting pre-packaged lesson plans on its Web site-plans that are easy for teachers to download and follow, take up about 45-minute blocks of class time and match the state's learning goals. The "Learning to Give" plans are available for every grade level and were written by Michigan teachers three years ago under grants from the W.K. Kellogg, Ford, Surdna, and Ewing Marion Kauffman foundations and the Lilly Endowment. The project was organized by the Council of Michigan Foundations. Grosse Pointe, Plymouth-Canton and Romulus schools have used the Michigan lesson plans, and teachers in Indiana, Pennsylvania, Texas and Ohio are creating similar packets. �"If we, as a system, don't become better at teaching children that it's not about me, but what I can do for others, we've tmly lost it," said Purdy, who wrote Wednesday's lesson for the project. "It's something we've gotten away from and we need to get back to, especially after last month's events." The lessons cover everything from nonprofit organizations to the difference between being a hero and being famous. �Kindergartners might talk about sharing their toys while sixth-graders may read biographies of children who lived in Japanese internment camps following the Pearl Harbor attacks. High school students are encouraged to research nonprofit agencies and volunteer their time after school. "Many people think of philanthropy as an older fellow who digs in his pockets and gives money," said Janice Peterson, who teaches preschool at Woodward Elementary School in Detroit. "But even the littlest ones have the capacity to be productive and to help their community. If we get to them early and teach about caring, it is an investment that pays off in the long run." As part of their philanthropy lesson, Peterson has her students clean the school playground each year. She then has them discuss their feelings of accomplislunent to reinforce the idea of feeling good after giving. Purdy's students offered several examples of how they and their families help others. "My mom said it was real important to help people when the planes crashed. She doesn't know if it's going to happen again, so she gave some money," said 10-year-old Keisha Joyce. John Kirk, 9, said he gives lost motorists directions and delivers messages within his apartment building for disabled neighbors. "Some don't have food or family, so if we give them money or food, they'll be happier and might forget they don't have family," he said. T.J. Bucholz, a department of education spokesm an, said the state also is collecting money to send to the September 11th Fund in New York, eannarked to aid children, and providing information to school administrators on how to help students deal with last month's attacks. "It is just as important to teach philanthropy as it is to teach social studies or math or science," he said. "Learning to Give"lessonplansareat/child2child/index.htm.">www.state.mi.us /mde/child2chi ld/index.htm. Contact JULIE ROSS at 313-223-4534 or ross@freepress.com. �Caption: Ramona Purdy, a teacher at VanZile Elementary School in Detroit, teaches her students the importance of giving. Schools are starting to emphasize lessons in philanthropy. At VanZile Elementary, Purdy helps her students define philanthropy, using volunteers at the site of the World Trade Center as an example. "What were they giving? Their time, talent and treasure. That's philanthropy." This electronic version may differ slightly from the printed article. The Detroit Free Press archives are stored on a SAVE (tm) newspaper library system from MediaStream, a Knight Ridder company. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Learning-to-Give Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book Learning to Give Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book Learning to Give. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50426 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/2d76a95c0b2c86294e81f044078cea04.pdf e58806713ff087887bf023321fd85b40 PDF Text Text 15 September 22, 200 l Memo To: C. David Campbell, Chairman and Board ofTrustees From: Libby Maynard and David Kennedy, Co-Chairs Government Relations Committee Re: Annual Review of Legislative Goals Statement and other business The Government Relations Committee met on August 17, 2001. The Committee completed its annual review of the Legislative Goals Statement; examined the charitable provisions ofH.R. 7 at the federal level; discussed strategies for increasing philanthropy's presence in Lansing with David Haynes of Public Affairs Associates, and met with Pat Babcock, Director of Public Policy at the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, on the charge for CMF's new Public Policy Committee. A copy of the minutes ofthe meeting with related documents are attached. Based on the work of the Committee we are presenting two recommended actions for discussion and approval. I. Annual Approval of Legislative Goals Statement RESOLVED that the Legislative Goals Statement be approved with the following changes noted in the copy attached to this resolution: National Legislative Issues Revision of Goal4: To repeal the excise tax on private foundations, replacing the previous goal of reducing the excise tax to a flat one percent. State Legislative Issues Addition of new Goal to support simplification of the Charitable Solicitation Act. Background ~A-9~ The Committee feels that simplification of the ~e tax is an intermediate step with the goal being an ultimate repeal. This new position supports the position of the Council on Foundations. Because community foundations are subject to the Charitable Solicitation Act, the Committee supports the addition of this Goal, which is also a Goal of the Michigan Nonprofit Association. �16 Govemment Relations Memo September 22, 2001 Page2 The Committee wants to highlight that three Goals have been completed and have been moved to the accomplishments list • The old National Goal 13 to support elimination ofthe Charitable Split Dollar Insurance Plan • The old State Goals 3 and 4 on legislation to strengthen the definition of a community foundations in the state tax code and to allow for the transfer of gifts received by public school systems to community foundations Finally, the Committee approved language updating the explanation of the goals to reflect the current legislative efforts in Lansing and Washington. II. Creation of a Philanthropy Caucus in the State Legislature €t\.W V~ ~~If\"\~~ tJ. ~ t& RESOLVED that CMF suppe~catiollof a Philanthropy Caucus, a bi-partisan (_ group of up to 20 state legislators representing both the Senate and the House, with ~ o.Ll a purpose to share the work of foundations and corporate giving programs with ~ their colleagues and to refer questions to CMF. ~6a.S ..rc-9-- Background The State Legislature is again undergoing great transition due to term limits with more than 2/3 of the State Senate being new in the 2002 election. While CMF and our members can continue to work on educating new legislators, we need to consider using those legislators that both understand philanthropy and are positioned on key committees to help us help their colleagues better understand the role that philanthropy plays in Michigan. We believe that there is such a group oflegislators on both sides of the aisle and in both Chambers that understand the work of foundations and corporate giving programs in our State. .• As a next step, staff and the Co-Chairs of the Government Relations Committee would work with David Haynes, CMF's lobbyist from Public Affairs Associates in Lansing to identify likely co-chairs of such a PbiJantbropy Caucus. Because much of the legislature's work involving philanthropy comes from the tax and finance areas, two examples of such legislators are Representative Patti Birkholz (Republican from Holland), a member of the House Tax Policy Committee, and Senator Bob Emerson (Democrat from F lint), a member of the Senate Finance Committee. �17 Council of MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS Suite 3/0ne South Harbor Avenuc/P.O. Box 599/Grand Haven, Ml 494 17/(616) 842-7080/ FAX (616) 842'-1 760 cmf@cmif.org · www.cmif.org COUNCIL OF MICIDGAN FOUNDATIONS Legislative Goals Statement The purpose of the Council of Michigan Foundations' Government Relations Committee is to seek support for legislative changes at both the state and national levels that encourage the role and effectiveness of foundation and corporate philanthropy. The CMF Board of Trustees approved the initial Legislative Statement on March I, 1979_ Revised statements were approved September 19, 1980; January 27, 1982; May 10, 1983; June 14, 1985; April l2, 1988; February 25, 1992; November 4, 1992; November 8, 1995; October 30, 1996; March 13, 1997; November4, 1998; October 14, 1999; October 2, 2000, and October 2001. I. PIDLANTHROPY IN MICIDGAN AND AMERICA Foundation and corporate giving has long been a unique part of American society. ln 1999, foundations and corporations in America donated more than $ 1.1 billion for charitable causes and services, including the arts, United Way, colleges and universities, libraries, and programs for the elderly and the needy. Today, with a slowing in the economy, foundations and corporations are being challenged to increase their support and charitable donations in the face of program changes initiated by national, state, and local governments, as wel l as increased needs_ ln the face of this challenge, it is apparent that more can and should be done to encourage the creation and growth of new foundations and corporate giving programs as well as to reduce the operating regulatory burdens on existing foundations and corporate giving programs. Unfortunately, the 1969 Tax Act, while introducing a number of reforms, also erected a number of major barriers to foundation philanthropy_ These include the provisions that serve as dis incentives for the creation of new foundations, as well as provisions that discourage charitable donations to existing foundations. It has become apparent that a number of Internal Revenue Service Code regulations, based on the 1969 Tax Act, have proven to be unnecessarily restrictive on the grantrnaking effectiveness ofMichigan's more than 1,600 foundations, as well as the more than 48,000 other foundations in communities across the United States. If foundations and corporations are to expand their support of important social needs and programs, the Council of Michigan Foundations must work actively to inform the general public_ as well as state and federal legislators, and other policymakers on these important issues. In 1977, the Members ofCMF directed the Board ofTrustees to develop a public information program that would support and encourage Michigan foundation philanthropy and include communication with public policymakers. A Government Relations Committee was established to implement the program and has continued to survey CMF Members on their legislative interests and priorities on a timely basis. rlll t lssocialion rifl'runulolirii/S IIIUf Crlljlflmliulls .1/ttldng (,mntsjiJr Charitu/Jie PIIIJI"-'es. �18 CMF has worked with foundation and corporate Members, the Council on Foundations, other regional associations of grantmakers and the Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers, Independent Sector, Michigan Nonprofit Association, and other nonprofit organizations to enhance the understanding of public policymakers about foundation philanthropy and to bring about appropriate legislative changes in laws and regulations. As a result of these efforts by CMF and others, the following twenty-five goals have been accomplished: U. NATIONAL GOALS • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Reduction of mandatory pay-out requirement for private foundations to 5% Excise Tax on private foundations reduced from 4% to 2%, and in some cases 1% Private foundation .65 limit on grant administrative expenses terminated Fair regulations on private foundation lobbying issued Full deductibility of gifts to private foundations of publicly-traded stock made permanent Gain portion of gifts of appreciated property not subject to the alternative minimum tax reduction Affidavit process for simplifying private foundations grants to non-U.S. Charities instituted Private & community foundations allowed to ownS-Corporation stock Protected charitable gift annuities as attractive giving vehicle for donors Premiums paid for D&O liability insurance not treated as compensation for trustees Regulation passed indicating U.S. Foundation grants to nonresident aliens woul9 be taxed, depending on the place where the research or study takes place Community foundations permitted to administer pooled income fund Due date of first estimated private foundation tax payment on investment income changed to coincide with the due date of the Form 990-PF Generation-skipping transfer law pertinent to the predeceased parent exclusion, extended for charitable lead and remainder trusts Legislation passed eliminating Charitable Split Dollar Insurance Plans Estate tax phased out between 2002 and 20 I0 ill. STATE GOALS • • • • • • • • • State inheritance tax repealed Community foundation tax credit for individuals and businesses made pennanent Definition of community foundation strengthened in tax code Tort liability of volunteers of nonprofit corporations limited Michigan Intangibles Tax repealed 501 (c)3 organizations allowed to have an insurable interest in the life of an individual who has given written consent Legislation (three separate bills) passed allowing gifts and bequests received by units of local government (cities, villages, counties, public libraries and schools), to be gifted to community foundations Nonprofit Corporation Act amended to allow youth ages 16 and 17 to serve on boards of nonprofit corporations with vote Legislation passed allowing distribution of tobacco settlement funds to state-certified community foundations for healthy youth and healthy senior programs 2 �19 IV. NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE ISSUES 1. Goal: Maintain the private foundation payout rate at not more than 5 percent to protect the real value of foundations' grantmaking capability. Explanation: In order to preserve the "real" grantmaking capacity of a private foundation, it is important that all historical financial data be taken into consideration. History has shown that a portion of the annual return should be returned to principal. (Reilly/Skadden, University ofMichigan Graduate School of Business Administration study sponsored by CMF, 1981 -Private Foundations: The Payout Requirement and Its Effect on Investment and Spending Policies, and a DeMarche Associates, Inc. study "Spending Policies and Investment Planning for Foundations, " 1995, sponsored by the Council on Foundations.) CMF sponsored study, completed in May 2000, by Cambridge Associates, Inc., of the actual performance of a group of Michigan endowed private foundations confirms the position of maintaining the payout rate at no more than 5 percent. 2. Goal: Change the limitation on gifts to a private foundation from 20 percent to 50 percent. Explanation: Under existing law, the amount deductible by an individual taxpayer for contributions to private non-operating foundations is computed as a percentage of the donor's contribution base (in most cases, his or her adjusted gross income). An individual may deduct only 20 percent of the gifts of appreciated property or 30 percent of gifts of cash. On the other hand, an individual taxpayer can deduct up to 50 percent of his contribution base for cash (and 30 percent for appreciated property) for gifts to public charities. 3. Goal: Increase the deduction allowed a taxpayer for a gift to a private foundation of certain capital gain property. Explanation: Currently, individual taxpayers may deduct the full fair market value of a gift to a private foundation of appreciated property in the form of publicly-traded stock, if the gift is Jess than 10 percent of the outstanding stock of the company. However, in other cases, such as privately held stock, the amount of deduction continues to be limited to the donor' s cost or basis in the stock if the gift is to a private non-operating foundation. The same gift to a public charity entitles the taxpayer to a full fair market value deduction. 4. Goal: Repeal the excise tax on private foundations. Explanation: The 1984 Tax Act allows the excise tax on investment income to be reduced from 2 to 1 percent if a foundation 's payout for the year in question equals or exceeds an amount equal to the year' s assets, times the average payout percentage for the five years, plus 1 percent of the foundation ' s net investment income. Private foundations are the only 50 I ©(3) organizations that currently pay this federal tax . The current formula is difficult to administer and can limit charitable giving. 3 �20 While simplification to a flat one percent is an acceptable intermediate step and is in H.R.7 passed the summer of2001, the Senate has introduced SB 1300 that calls for repeal of the tax. 5. Goal: Prevent further efforts to reduce the usefulness of the charitable deduction and repeal the 3 percent floor on itemized deductions. Explanation: In 1990, after initially considering a cap on all itemized deductions, Congress approved a 3 percent floor in deductions . This floor was scheduled to expire at the end of 1995, but was made permanent effective in 1993. 6. Goal: Limit lineal descendants who are "disqualified persons" at the level of grandchildren. Explanation: In 1984, the law was amended to limit "disqualified persons" to substantial contributors to a foundation and their children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, and their spouses. The amendment provided that substantial contributors will no longer be considered "disqualified persons" if, over a ten-year period, they meet certain requirements to distance themselves from the foundation. However, there is still no logical rationale- -or examples of abuse-- to justify the inclusion of lineal descendants beyond the level of grandchildren. 7. Goal: Modify the law to permit the " out of corpus" requirement to be met by a foreign grantee if sufficient documentation is provided showing that the full amount of the grant was spent for the specified purposes within 12 months after the year the grant was made. Explanation: When making grants to some foreign charities, private foundations are required to treat them as private foundations. Any grant from a private foundation to another private foundation requires that the amount granted "flow through" the grantee and out as qualifying distributions that are made "out of corpus" by the end of the following year. The purpose for this rule is to prevent a foundation from avoiding the payout rule by having one private foundation give to another, who then simply adds the grant to its endowment (corpus), with charitable grantees receiving no benefit. In the foreign grant context, the grantee rarely has any endowment and totally misunderstands the concept of "out of corpus." 8. Goal: Secure passage of legislation providing a charitable deduction for non-itemizers. Explanation: Most taxpayers no longer file the long tax form that permits itemized deductions; instead they file the short form that al lows only a standard deduction. From 1983 to 1986 non-itemizers were permitted to take the standard deduction plus itemize charitable contributions within certain limits, but the deduction expired J anuary I, 1987. In July 200 I the House passed H.R. 7 that includes a phased in deduction over ten years from $25 to $100. Senator Gramm has introduced S. 35, which contains a provision that would phase in a l 00% deduction by 2006. 4 �21 9. Goal: Support reasonable limits on the degree to which foundations and charities can lobby or otberwise.influence public policy decisions and oppose unreasonable limits that adversely affect grantmaking. Explanation: Continuous monitoring is essential to oppose unreasonable and urmecessary regulatory reporting burdens on both foundations and their grantees. 10. Goal: Support legislation to eliminate the classification of realized gains and income, derived from leveraged real estate investments by foundations, as unrelated business taxable income. Explanation: Foundations and nonprofit organizations are significant investors in the real estate market. Income derived from leveraged real estate investments, owned directly or through partnerships, is currently taxed as unrelated business taxable income (UBTI). Legislation would have private foundations treated in the same manner as educational organizations and qualified pemsion plans, which since 1980 have been exempt from the debt-financed property rules with respect to the acquisition of certain real property. 11. Goal: Permit tax-free distribution from individual retirement accounts (JRAs) for charitable purposes. Explanation: It is proposed that direct gifts from an IRA to a charitable organization would not be taxed as income to the account-holder who has attained the age of 59- 112 years of age, if the disbursement is made directly to either a qualified charity or a qualifying deferred giving plan, known as the IRA - Charitable Rollover Bill (H. R. 13 11 , S. 1086). It is anticipated that such a law would increase contributions to many charitable organizations, including community foundations. H.R. 7, passed by the House in July 2001, includes the IRA Rollover at age 70 1/2. Efforts are underway to have the Senate support similar legislation introduced by Senator Hutchison asS. 205. 12. Goal: Avoid excessive corporate giving regulations. Explanation: CMF supports public accountability, but not excessive regulation, which would require costly administration. While legislation was introduced in 2000 which would require public companies annually to disclose to their shareholders the charities to which they made contributions and U1e amount of each contribution if a corporate officer or spouse is on the grantee's board, it has never received suflicient Committee support to be considered by the House or Senate. 13. Goal: Monitor the impact of estate tax legislation passed in 200 I on creation of new foundations and gifts to exiting foundations. Explanation: The "Tax ReliefReconciliatioo Act of2001" passed by the Congress and signed into law by the President in June 2001, phases out the Estate Tax between 2002 and 20 I 0. Full repeal however is only in effect for the year 2010, and the estate tax then reverts, unless new legislation is passed, to the 2000 tax code status. 5 �22 While it is the position of CMF to not support or oppose legislation that has a broad impact beyond the charitable field, it is necessary to monitor the impact on philanthropy of this legislation and future changes that might be made in the estate tax. V. STATE LEGISLATIVE ISSUES 1. Goal: Monitor changes to tax policy pertaining to community benefits as it relates to non-profits. Explanation: Legislation has been proposed in Colorado, Pennsylvania and Texas, which threatens the tax exemption of charitable organizations. CMF, working with partners such as the Michigan Nonprofit Association, will closely monitor any related efforts in Michigan. 2. GoaJ: Support legislation encouraging a tax-deduction for charitable contributions from individuals. Explanation: Other states have found that a tax deduction does help encourage additional gifts by individuals to charities. While the introduction oflegislation in tough economic times is unlikely, the Michigan Nonprofit Association is taking the lead in promoting this issue with the legislature. 3. Goal: Monitor legislation necessary for a portion of the state tobacco settlement funds to be annually granted to CMF for distribution to certified Michigan community foundations for the establishment of Healthy Youth & Healthy Senior Funds. Explanation: Michigan's share of the national tobacco settlement ($206 billion over the next 26 years) between 46 states, five commonwealths and territories and the District of Columbia with five tobacco companies, representing 97.5% of the industry, is $8.3 billion. The master settlement agreement does not specify bow states may spend their settlement payments. Distribution of tobacco settlement funds by CMF to 64 certified community foundations for 2000 and 2001 equals $15.8 million. Another $5.9 mHlion has been approved as part of the Department of Career Development's $6 million allocation to CMF for the State's 2001-2002 fiscal year. Annual monitoring of this legislation is required to insure that the Legislature understands the valuable role the community foundations play. 4. Goal: Support legislation to simplify tbe C haritable Solicitations Act. Explanation: Community foundations are required as well as other charitable nonprofits to file for an annual solicitation license. The licensing, enforcement, and appeal processes are not considered user friendly by nonprofits and do not reflect the changing cost in fundraising. CMF bas joined MNA in supporting proposed legislation that Representative George is considering introducing with support from the Attorney General's Office. Approved by the CMF Board ofTrustees, October 2, 2001 6 �23 Minutes of the Government Relations Committee August 17,2001 In attendance: Co-Chairs Libby Maynard and David Kennedy, Maureen Smyth, Leonard Smith, Fred Woodruff, Jack Hopkins, Pat Babcock and Rob Collier Special Guests: David Haynes of Public Affairs Associates and Julia Szanton, International Coordinator for CMF The Meeting was called to order at 10:05 a.m. by Co-Chairs Maynard and Kennedy. Special Lansing Initiatives David Haynes led a discussion on strategies for increasing the visibility of CMF in Lansing in light of term limits. The three strategies discussed included: a philanthropy day, a philanthropy caucus, and targeted meetings with legislators. There was consensus that CMF should move forward in encouraging development of a philanthropy caucus. Once the Board approves the concept, Collier will develop a draft statement for the Committee to review that Haynes will use to help present the caucus idea to key legislators. There was consensus that it is prematwe to consider a special philanthropy day. However, Haynes recommends that key legislators on the attached Circle oflnfluence list be matched with grantmakers. Collier will provide the Committee with a suggested match list to discuss. Legislative Goals Statement A. Federal Goals The Committee approved three actions related to the federal goals. • Goal 13 on elimination of the charitable split dollar insurance plans has been completed and moved to the accomplishments list • Goall4 concerning monitoring the estate tax continue to be kept on the list of ongoing goals • Goal4 on the excise tax be amended to recommend full repeal of the tax with simplification added to the explanation section. B. State Goals The Committee approved two actions: • Goals 4 and 5 concerning community foundations have been completed and moved to the accomplishments list • A new Goal be added to support modification to the Charitable Solicitation Act because community foundations are subject to this Act. �24 Government Relations Comminee Minutes Augustl 7,200 1 Page2 Committee Job Description The Committee approved the updated job description (attached) on condition that a Michigan Philanthropy Day in Lansing be deleted as a proposed activity. Public Policy Committee Pat Babcock, Director of Public Policy for the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, reviewed the proposed charge for the Public Policy Committee. There was consensus that the charge was appropriate and that there should be a common member to both Committees. Mr. Babcock will k eep this Committee informed of the activities of the Public Policy Committee. There being no further business, the meeting adjourned at 1:00 p.m. �25 Community Foundations & State Leadership Circle of Influence Our circle of influence should include those key decision-makers that can have a positive affect on our goals and objectives. This circle should include leadership in both chambers; committee members on chambers tax policy committees, and other legislators who we have identified as supportive of community foundations. House Leadership peaker of the House, ruck Johnson Majority Floor Leader, Bruce Patterson Minority Leader. Kwame Kilpatrick Mino rity Floor Leader, Gilda Jacobs Senate Leadership Majority Leader, Dan DeGraw Majority Floor Leader, Joanne Emmons Minority Leader. John Cherry Minority Floor Leader, Bob Emerson Future Sentite Leadership Sen. Ken Sikkema Sen. Thaddeus McCotter House Tax Policy Committee Rep. Nancy Cassis, Chair Rep. Steve Vear Rep. Patti Birkholz Rep. Jennifer Faunce Rep. Bob Gosselin Rep. Mike Kowall Rep. Tom Meyer Rep. Gary Newell Rep. Randy Richardville Rep. Gary Woronchak Senate Finance Conmuttee Sen. Joanne Emmons, Chair Sen. Bev Hammerstrom Sen_B ill Bullard Rep. Nancy Quarles Rep. Ray Basham Rep. Bob Brown Rep. Derrick Hale Rep. Jack Minore Rep. Bill O'Neil Rep. Paul Wojno Sen. Gary Peters Sen. Bob Emerson �26 CMF Government Relations Committee P urpose: to seek support for legislative changes at the state a nd national levels that enconrage the role and effectiveness of foundation and corporate philanthropy. Key Activities l. Regularly communicate with elected officials at federal, state, and local levels about foundation activities and concerns. 2. Encourage and support Member foundations in reporting grants and activities to government officials, beyond the reports required by law, such as through published annual reports or guidelines. 3. Encourage Members in each Congressional District to meet as a group with their legislator, when the legislator is in District, to discuss the local contributions of community and private foundations, and corporate giving. 4. Encourage meetings with local editorial boards and the media about foundation activities and concerns. 5. Develop state legislative network by House and Senate districts and enhance communication with key committee leadership. 6. Regularly communicate with the Michigan Attorney General' s Office regarding community and private foundation concerns. 7. Meet periodically with the Executive Branch of state government regarding foundation issues and concerns 8. Sponsor periodic seminars for state legislators, department heads, and their staffs. 9. Hold an annual "Washington Day" for members to meet with each member ofthe Michigan Congressional delegation. I 0. Support creation of a Public Policy Committee to assist CMF staff in educating members about public policy issues affecting grantmaking priorities and opportunities for publicpri vale partnerships. 11. Support crea tion of a Mjchjgan Philanthropy Caucus with a bi-partisan group of up to 20 legislators familiar a nd supportive of phila nthropy. Reviewed by the CMF Government Relations Committee 8/ 17/0 1 with # 11 subject to Board approval. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Government-Relations-Committee-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book government relations committee report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book government relations committee report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50425 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/6d110698532047b9a1690b9e3268a1cd.pdf f9ad0310ba01ab0a7817f5fb661f16b9 PDF Text Text October 22, 200 1 Memo to: CMF Board of Trustees From: Richard K. Rappleye Chair, Audit & Finance Committee RE: CMF & Supporting Organization 9-30-01 Financial Statements Core Operations Note 1: Member Contributions The variance from budget is primarily due to timing issues. In comparing the 9-30-01 numbers to last year, we had received $555,000 through 9-30-00. Based on the projected numbers that were run for the Membership Task Force, the $705,000 still appears to be a reasonable goal. Note 2: Conference Income & Expenses R egistration numbers for the Annual Conference are running significantly below the original projection. Management is looking at several areas to cut costs while still providing attendees with the same high quality experience they are used to. We have already reduced the number of tours and cut back on head counts for meals. Pending the outcome of final negotiations with the hotel, we are estimating a final loss of $50,000-$75,000. As of October 18, 2001, 400 people were registered for the conference, which is roughly half of previous years. Note 3: Publication Income The variance from budget is due to sales of the Directory falling off sooner than anticipated. Following the Annual Conference we will under take a special promotion to move the remaining directories. Inventory at the end of September was as follows. Book -1,071 CD's- 394 S:\Boards and Committees\CM F\Board\200 1-02\ 10.3 1.0 I Meeting Materials\ FinanceCttee I 0-3 1-0 I a.doc �Note 4: Investment Income The variance from budget is due to money market rates falling into the 3% range, which is 40% below last year' s rates. This reduction could potentially result in a $33,000 reduction in interest income for the current year. Note 5: Salaries The favorable variance is due to the following: Admin support for MCSC grants Downstairs receptionist position not filled Detroit office assistant not hired Staff wages charged to Dissemination Wages to MHSDA project CMF Admin other Special Projects Reduction of overtime & temp staff $9,600 18,600 4,300 3,100 5,500 7,600 14,900 Note 6: Computer Due to the delay in upgrading the iMIS software (membership & meeting data base) last year, $21,000 in expenses that were budgeted for 2000-01 h it our current fiscal year. Currently, $45,000 that was budgeted this year to purchase an on-line registration module for iMIS, is being used to purchase software and equipment that will allow staff remote access to their desk top computers; with the potential to provide internet training to our members down the road. Note 7: Travel The variance from budget is partially due to the increase in air travel and fuel costs experienced this year. Also the CMF core budget is covering a greater portion of the auto costs for the President which is split with the WKKF III Grant. Air Auto Meals Hotels $3,380 12,390 1,442 5,627 S:\Boards and Committees\CM F\Board\200 1-02\ 10.3 1.0 I Meeting Materials\ FinanceCttee I 0-31 -0 I a.doc �Endow ment Funds Note 8: Other Grants- MCFYP Endowment The W.K. Kellogg Foundation approved the transfer of $ 1,060,000 ofunused challenge grant funds to the MCFYP Endowment Fund to support the YACs of community foundations. Note 9: Professional Fees - Russell G. Mawby Fund The Russell Mawby Fund has been used to support strategic planning expenses which include the following expenses. Williams FERA Instrumented group FERA members survey Conference calls, mise $26,807 2,500 14,765 1,348 S:\Boards and Committees\CM F\Board\200 1-02\ 10.3 1.0 I Meeting Materials\ FinanceCttee I 0-3 1-0 I a.doc �Council of Michigan Foundations & Supporting Organizations Consolidated Balance Sheet September 30, 2001 II Supporting Organizations I CMF Core & Special Project s ASSETS Cash & Equivalents Investments Due From Other Funds Property, Plant & Equipment- Net Other Assets Grants Receivable Total Assets LIABILITIES Accounts Payable Other Liabilities Grants Payable Total Liabilities NET ASSETS (FUND BALANCE) Unrestricted & Temp Restrict. Endowment Funds KYIP Fund Total Net Assets Total Liabilities & Net Assets dlindbergffsstate/fs9798/FS 9-30-01-1 $2,856,836 1,243,727 499,528 17,250 2,097,434 $6,714,775 Endowment Funds MCFV $402,889 9,188,011 (222,258) $9,368,642 Mich igan AIDS Fund $6,346,943 10,498,274 (974,563) 15,954 1,384 $539,739 (46,906) 1,762 454,829 $949,424 $15,887,992 $ 58,716 265,456 324,172 $ 0 6.390.603 47,524 234,213 234,213 478,991 526,515 5,014.863 422.909 Tota l $10,146,407 19,686,285 0 517,244 18,634 2,552,263 $32,920,833 $47,524 58,716 978,660 1,084,900 6,390,603 9,368,642 10,638,916 15,653,779 422,909 11,828.375 9,368,642 10,638,916 31,835,933 $6,714,775 $9,368,642 $15,887,992 $949,424 $32,920,833 9,368,642 �Council of Michigan Foundations & Supporting Organizations Consolidated Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Assets 4-1-01 to 9-30-01 Core O(!eratlons Council of Michigan Foundations CMF Sp ecial En dowment Funds P roJects II CMF To tal Supporting Organizations Michigan AIDS MCFV Fund Combined Total Revenues Member Contributions Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Conference Income Publications & Library Services Other Income Investm ent Income Total Revenues s 540,700 37,346 3,417 7 1,618 22,785 (225) 28,299 703,940 $0 $ 1,653,140 3,990 67,053 1,724,183 1,093,884 1,340 225 1,600 (573,174) 523,875 $540,700 37,346 2,750,44 1 76,948 23,010 1,375 (477 ,822) 2.951,998 $509,150 13,565 919 15,000 (552,949) (1 4,315) $724,889 8,917 733,806 $540,700 37,346 3.984,480 90,513 23.929 16,375 (1 ,021,854 3,671,489 Program/Admin Expenses Salaries & Benefits Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Computer Association Due s Books & S ubscriptions Publications & Printing Professional & Contracted Services Travel T raining & Seminars Conh::!r~ l u.;e & Meeliny Ovemead Allocation to Spec Proj Total Program/Admin 299,379 19,336 1 1,003 3,619 17,534 9,585 6,053 1,6 12 44,962 16,501 3,235 24,323 24,213 22,839 2,633 1 18,503 (16,9921 608,338 467,917 2,720 2,890 11,516 10,612 2,043 4 ,93 1 2,24 1 2 1,446 334,837 31 ,987 1,705 42,096 16,992 953,933 174,851 327 6,149 1,227 6,016 1,976 2,432 64,644 3,762 942, 147 22,383 20,042 4,846 35,066 22,173 8,485 3,655 59.733 16,601 5,635 45,769 406,644 55,308 4,338 164,361 254,915 1,817,186 9,840 100 159 47,594 482 9,189 97,518 6,652 6,391 420 1,645 8 ,354 992 12,301 11,985 6,578 70,453 2 1,569 4,331 48,506 55 2,880 36,634 5,723 475 5,019 1 '104,309 29,035 27,687 5 ,266 37.470 34,923 9,477 15,956 80.907 16.601 5,690 55,227 513.731 82,600 9, 144 217,886 231 ,679 197,044 2 245 909 1.254 759 4,396 GRANTS Mini Grants Challenge Grants Affiliation Mini-Grants Computer G rants Computer Loan Other Grants Total Grants Excess Revenues Over Expenditures 0 0 0 0 0 800 800 94,802 2,741 ,381 2.741 ,381 (1 ,971 .131) Beginning Net Assets Transfer from MCFV 1 .065,278 7,201 ,654 Change in N e t Assets 94,802 $ 1,160,080 (1 ,971 ,131) $5.230,523 Ending Net Assets 34,000 34,000 8,310 8,310 2,742, 181 2.742 .181 1,253,950 1,296.260 698,938 698.938 4,695,069 4.737,379 268,960 (1 ,607,369) (1 ,542,254) (162,176) (3.311 ,799) 9,01 4,976 84,706 268,960 $9.368,642 17,281,908 84,706 (1 ,607,369) $ 15,759,245 17,280,739 (84,706) (1,542,254) $15,653,779 585,085 35.147.732 (162,176) $422.909 (3.311 ,799) $31 .835,933 �CMF Endowment Funds Consolidated Statement of Activities and Changes in Net Assets 4-1-0•1 to 9-30-01 Allen Fund Revenues Mem ber Contrib utions Additional Membe r Contrib utions Other Grants Conference Income Publications & Library Services Other Income Investm ent Income Total Revenues Russell G Mawby Fund s s Mawby Fund For K ids Endowment Funds Johnson Community Educational Foundation Fund Endowment s $ $ $ 33,834 50 MCFYP Endowment $ 1,060,000 1,340 225 (11 ,476) (11 ,476 Program/Ad m in Expenses Salaries & Benefits Occupancy Telephone Equipment lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Computer Association Dues Books & Subscriptions P ublica ti ons & P rinting P rofessional & Contracted Services T ravel T raining & Seminars Conference & M eeting Total Program/Adm in (82,903) 82,628 (43,648) 42,308 1.600 (50,822) 49,222 13,566 47,506 47.506 17 13.583 3,4 66 3,466 (322,272) (288,4 38) (62,053) 997,947 131,655 327 5,809 1,227 6,016 1,936 2 ,432 29.630 9, 130 100 159 710 88 216 123 159.2 18 Six Month Budget 913012001 Total 340 40 1.093,884 1,340 225 1,600 (573, 174 523,875 1,090,800 26,000 174,851 327 6 ,149 1,227 6 ,016 1,976 2,432 184 ,500 500 8,000 1,000 6,000 5,000 2 ,500 500 6 ,200 500 9,840 100 159 426,900 1,543,700 266 47,594 4 82 11,200 55,000 4 ,500 156 31.142 3,762 254.915 19 ,500 304,900 GRANTS - M i r~ iGumt:s Challe ng e G rants Affiliation Mi ni· Grants Computer Grants Computer loan Other Grants Total Grants Excess Revenues. Over Expenditures (11 ,476) Begi nni ng Net Assets Tra nsfer from Other Assets Excess Revenues. over Expenditures Ending Net Assets 173.633 d llnd berglfinslat/98-99/FS 9 -30-01-3 (130,1 34) 1.441,288 (11 ,476) (130, 134) $ 162, 157 $1,311,1 54 (55 .891 ) (52.688) 784 ,31 1 886,026 (55 ,891 ) $728.420 (52.688) $833.338 Note 8 (447 ,656) 966.805 268,960 1,238.800 5.729,7 18 84,706 (447,656) $ 5.366.768 9,014 ,976 84,706 268,960 $9.368.642 9,014.976 966,805 $966 .805 1,238,800 $ 10 .253,776 Note 9 �Council of Michigan Foundations Core Operations Internal Statement of Activities 4-01-01 to 9-30-01 Budget 6 Month Actual 6 Month Budgeted 2001 -02 9/30/2001 9/30/2001 12 Month Revenues Member Contributions Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Conference & Meetings Publications & Library Services Other Income Investment Earnings Total Revenues 705,000 260,000 516,800 94,000 1,000 90,000 1,666,800 Program/Admin Expenses 717,000 Salaries & Benefits Occupancy 42,000 Telephone 32,000 Equipment Lease & Maintenance 5,000 45,000 Postage 35,000 Supplies Insurance 6,600 Equipment & Furniture 31,000 Computer 77.000 Association Dues 18,500 Books & Subscriptions 7,000 66,000 Publications 40,000 Professional & Contracted Services Travel 34,000 Training & Seminars 6,000 538,700 Conference & Meetings Overhead Allocation to Spec Projects (34,000) Total Program/Admin 1,666,800 $540,700 37,346 3.417 71,618 22,785 (225) 28,299 703,940 299,379 19,336 11,003 3,619 17,534 9,585 6,053 1,612 44.962 16,501 3,235 24,323 24,213 22,839 2,633 118,503 (16,992) 608,338 $575,000 25,000 Note 1 244,000 50 ,000 500 45,000 939,500 Note 2 Note 3 363,000 21 ,000 16,200 2,500 22,500 17,500 6,600 9,000 17.400 15,700 3,600 33,000 26,000 17,000 3,000 158,700 (17,000) 715,700 Note 5 Grants Mini-Grants General Purpose Challenge Grants Affiliation Mini-Grants Computer Grants Computer Loan Other Grants Total Grants 0 800 800 0 Excess Revenues Over Expenditures 0 94,802 223,800 1,065,278 1,065,278 94,802 $1 ,160,080 1,065,278 223,800 $1,289,078 Beginning Net Assets CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE Ending Net Assets dllndberblfsstaUfs99001FS 9-30-01.xlsl-4 0 1,065,278 Note 4 Note 6 Note 7 Note 2 �October 22, 200 1 Memo to: CMF Board of Trustees From: Robert E. Swaney, Jr. Chair, Investment Committee Re: CMF 6-30-01 Investment Report Resolved: That the CMF Board of Trustees accept the June 30, 2001 Investment Report as recommended by the CMF Investment Committee. On a quarterly basis, the combined Investment Committee for the Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF), Michigan Community Foundations' Venture (MCFV) and the Michigan AIDS Fund (MAF), meet to review the investment performance for the operating and pennanent endowment funds. The reports contained in this section were reviewed by the Investment Committee on August 16, 2001. The next Investment Committee meeting is scheduled for November 19, 2001 to review the September 30, 2001 investment results. The enclosed Investment Report has been broken down into three sections. Investment Performance Report The bench-mark is based on the targeted asset allocation fonnula listed below. S&P 500 S&P 400 S&P 600 International Short Bond Bond Cash 40% 10% 6% 14% 15% 15% 0% Since the equity portion of the permanent funds is invested in index funds, the variances from the bench-marks are primarily due to investment management fees (which are roughly 21 basis points), and the variance in the asset allocation mix from the target established by the Investment Committee and approved by this Board. On November 19, 2001 the Investment Committee will be meeting with the investment managers to review the allocation of international equities. S:\Boards and Commiltees\CMF\Board\200 1-02110.31 .0 IMeeting Mmerials\ lnvestmenti0-3 1-0 l .doc �Asset Allocation Report The Investment Committee has approved an asset allocation re-balancing policy that instructs the CMF VP of Finance to rebalance the endowment fund portfolios on a quarterly basis. To keep administrative time to a minimwn CMF maintains one checking account to pay all endowment fund expenses. The negative cash balances are due to endowment fund expenditures from the CMF checking account, which are periodically reimbursed, by transferring cash from the endowment funds back to CMF. The high concentration of cash in the William Allen Fund is due to an influx of cash during the month of June, which was invested in July. On May 11 ,2001 the CMF Board ofTrustees approved the establishment ofthe Michigan Conununity Foundation's Youth Project (MCFYP) Endowment Fund. A permanent endowment fund as approved by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, by using the grant dollars remaining from the Round 12 challenge grant. The purpose of this fund is to support the ongoing technical assistance and training needs of community foundation youth advisory committees in Michigan. Thi s fund is being invested over a six month period ending December 2001. Investment Performance Comparison Report The variances from the Cambridge actual one-year rate of returns, are primarily due to the returns in the venture capital and private equity market, which are categories not allowed under our current investment policy. You will note that over a three-year period the endowment funds that have been fully-invested during this period, track relatively close to the Cambridge pool. The Committee will continue to monitor the differences with the Cambridge pool carefully, and consider adjustments to the asset allocations where appropriate. S:\Boards and Commiltees\CMF\Board\200 1-02110.31.0 IMeeting Materials\ lnvestmenti0-3 1-0 l .doc �46 Council of Michigan Foundations Asset Allocation June 30-2001 Investment Balance 6/30f01 Actual Asset Allocation Targeted Asset Allocation Endowment Funds Russell G. Mawby Endowment Fund to Improve & Increase Philanthropy and Ruth & Russ Mawby Fund for Kids Cash Equivalents Fixed Income Equities $ (71,824) 701,839 1,648,002 $ 2,278,017 -3.2% 30.8% 72.3% 100.0% 0% 30% 70% 100% $66,313 29,562 83,482 $179,357 37.0% 16.5% 46.5% 100.0% 0% 30% 70% 100% $119,605 1,722,986 4,129,185 $5,971,776 2.0% 28.9% 69.1% 100.0% 0% 30% 70% 100% $46,912 3,373,719 8,365,585 $11 ,786,216 0.4% 28.6% 71.0% 100.0% 0% 30% 70% 100% -0.1% 29.7% 70.4% 100.0% 0% 30% 70% 100% 67.0% 9.9% 23.1o/o 100.0% 0% 30% 70% 100% William Allen Endowment Fund Cash Equivalents Fixed Income Equities Community Foundation Endowment Cash Equivalents Fixed Income Equities KYIP Fund Cash Equivalents Fixed Income Equities Johnson Educational Fund Cash Equivalents Fixed Income Equities ($1 ,056) 275,234 651,675 $925,853 MCFYP Endowment Fund Cash Equivalents Fixed Income Equities dlindberg/board/cmf/0 1-02/Brdrpt 10-31-01 .xls-1 $705,415 104,189 243,492 $1,053,096 �47 Council of Michigan Foundations Asset Allocation June 30-2001 Investment Balance 6/30/01 Actual Asset Allocation Targeted Asset Allocation Operating Funds CMF Operating Fund $2,659,487 100% 100% MCFYP Operating & Special Projects $7,357,739 100% 100% $519,918 100% 100% Michigan AIDS Fund Note: All operating funds are invested in money market accounts. dlindberg/Board/CMF/01-02/Brdrpt 10·31-01.xls �48 Council of Michigan Foundations Permanent Funds Investment Performance Report June 30, 2001 William Allen Fund One Year Actual Bench Return Mark -5.78% -4.61% Compound Annual Two Year Actual Bench Return Mark 1.06% 1.61% Three Year Actual Bench Return Mark 5.24% 5.30% Mawby Endowment Funds -4.97% -4.61% 1.97% 1.61% 5.44% 5.30% Community Found Endowment -4.51% -4.61 % 2.24% 1.61% 5.59% 5.30% KYIP Fund -5.15% -4.61% 1.12% 1.61% 5.74% 5.30% Johnson Educational Fund -4.09% -4.61% N/A N/A N/A N/A MCFYP Endowment Fund N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Bench Mark Is based on the various indices that the portfolio is attempting to duplicate, using the targeted asset allocation adopted by the Investment Committee. Actual Returns Bench marks are gross offees, actual returns are net of fees (21 basis points). , dlindberg/Board/cmf/0 1-02/Brdrpt 10-31-01.xls-3 �49 Council of Michigan Foundations & Supporting Organizations Perman ent Funds Investment Performance Comparison Report 6130/01 I Quarter Ending 6-30..01 I Actual Return Cambridge Foundation Pool One Year Ending 6-30..01 Cambridge Actual Foundation Retum Pool I Three Yea rs Ending 6·30..01 I Actual Retum Cambridge Foundation Pool MawbyFunds 3.96% 3 .70% -4.97% ·2.10% 5.44% 6.80% Allen Fund 4.24% 3.70% ·5.78% ·2.10% 5 .24% 6.80% Community Foundalion Fund 4.20% 3.70% -4.51% ·2.10% 5.59% 6.80% KYIP 4.10% 3 .70% ·5.15% ·2.10% 5.74% 6.80% D. Johnson Educational Fund 4.07% 3 .70% -4.09% ·2.10% N/A NIA NIA N/A NIA MCFYP Endowment Fund N/A N/A N/A OAJ Fund was not fully invested until July 2000, MCFYP Endowment was established in May 2001 BenchMarks Wilshire 5000 S&P 500 Russell2500 LB Aggregate CPI-U 7.5% 5.9% 13.7% 0.6% 1.0% -15.3% ·14.8% 2.5% 11.2% 3.2% 3.5% 3.9% 8.5% 6 .3% 3.0% Note: Cambridge returns are based on a pool of 277 foundations, colleges and universities. Cambridge returns reported are median numbers. Asset Allocation Cambridge CMF Target Pool US Equities International Equities Fixed Income Cash Other Total Other Real Estate Venture Capital Private Equity Hedge Funds High Yield Bonds Oil & Gas Partnerships Distressed Securities Arbitrage Other 42.8% 11.9% 25.1% 3.9% 16.3% 100.0% 56.0% 14.0% 30.0% 0.0% 0.0% 100.0% 3.1% 2.1% 1.4% 5.3% 0.7% 0.3% 0.7o/o 2.2% 0.5% 16.3% • Represents the latest retum numbers available from Cambridge. Cambridge notes that venture alternative investments accounts for the difference in the one year retums. They also noted that these retums tend to be Clelayeel an<IOlaY. lum arounelln the next year. dllndberg/committee/invesV2000/M111901f.xls·1 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Financials Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book financials Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book financials. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50424 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/c097a386e55181488ef95d2c186e2edc.pdf 87b3956858b40953a6c621874768b5b6 PDF Text Text October 22, 200 1 Memo to: C. David Campbell, Chair, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Rob Collier, President Julie Cummings, Program Committee Co-Chair Re: 291h Annual Conference Update With ten days to go, registration is at 519 for the Conference - 326 fu ll registrants and 183 partial registrants. This number is made up of: 172 from community foundations, 40 from corporations, 49 from family foundations, and 94 from independent foundations. We shall provide you with an update at the Board Meeting. The Annual Conference features many outstanding speakers in addition to the Plenary Speakers. We want to bring your attention to the following individuals from outside Michigan and ask for your assistance in making them feel welcome. Wednesday afternoon Les Lenkowsky, Chief Executive Officer, Corporation for National and Community Service, Washington Sandy Hughes, Chief Knowledge Officer, National Center for Nonprofit Boards, Washington Robert LaFleur, Chieflnvestment Strategist, Northern Trust Bank, Chicago Thursday Rob Buchanan, Director International Programs, Council on Foundations, Washington Steve Rochlin, Director, Research & Policy Development, Boston College Center for Corporation Citizenship K.C. Connors, Vice President, Jeffrey Slocum & Associates, Minneapolis Friday morning Marc Owens, Caplin & Drysdale, Washington Bruce Katz, Director Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Brookings Institute, Washington, D.C. Deborah Katz, Health Policy Analyst, Community Catalyst, Boston Charles Scott, Executive Director, Association of Small Foundations, Bethesda David Salem, President, The Investment Fund for Foundations, Charlottesville, VA Michael Leon, Vice President, Northern Trust Bank, Chicago � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Conference-Committee-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book conference committee report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book conference committee report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50423 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/3fff1da84c849a208d6d6e4e771f3b8f.pdf 79cccff78d0f52de20f31e2be867f51f PDF Text Text October 12, 200 1 To: C. David Campbell, Chair, CMF Maureen Smyth, Chair, Supporting Organization Committee From: Jack Hopkins, Chair, MCFV Donnell Mersereau RE: 2001 Annual Report Michigan Community Foundations' Ventures Mission: To support joint programs of community foundations that result in economies of operations and growth in assets. Board of Trustees Jack Hopkins, Chair Mariam C. Noland, Vice Chair Robert G. Tambellini, Secretary/Treasurer Lucy R. Allen Elizabeth A. Cherin Neeta M. Delaney Sandi Dobbins Brenda L. Hunt Olivia P. Maynard Chris A. McGuigan Victor J. Papale Patricia A. Reynolds Diana R. Sieger Jeanne Snow David A. Woodworth The Community Foundations' Ventures Products Fund, with primary support from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation and the C.S. Mott Foundation, continues to be the primary project of MCFV. Activities this year have focused on: Minimum standards-47 community foundation boards have validated that their community foundations meet standards on governance, finance and administration, donor relations, grantmaking, communications and convening. A common identity system-All Michigan community foundations now include the word community in their name. Many are now presenting their name in a common way while retaining local logos. A capacity building curriculum- Trustees and staff participated in a series of four interactive distance-learning sessions on marketing. A statewide professional advisor marketing campaign-Ads placed with statewide profess ional periodicals, and magazines like Business Week have been complemented by local activities for advisors. �MCFV Annual Report October 12, 2000 Page2 Regional marketing activities-Six regions in the state are working collaboratively on regional marketing activities that will build a greater and more consistent marketing presence, create efficiencies in operations and help community foundations better serve their communities. New FIMS tracking- FIMS is the infonnation management software used by 32 Michigan community foundations. A new donor and advisor database was designed to allow for automatic tracking and reporting of activities related to the Venture Product Fund advertising campaign. Products from the ftrst phase of the Venture Products Fund, such as the PowerPoint presentation, What is a Community Foundation?, and the tag line "For Good. For Ever. ", are now being used by community foundations throughout the United States. The work of the Venture Products Fund is being continued in 2001 and 2002 as the Community Foundation Research and Development Incubator, overseen by a national advisory committee including Michigan community foundations, and funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the C.S. Mott Foundation and Michigan community foundations. The Incubator will continue the mission of the Venture Products Fund to be a responsive, representative, entrepreneurial and high-value initiative supporting the growth of community foundations through activities contributing to these goals: 1. 2. 3. To conduct research that will result in a better understanding of target audiences and how to better meet their needs and wants, To develop products and tools that will aid in continued asset growth and leadership of community foundations, and To develop communication tools, promotions and processes that will enhance the work of community foundations in reinforcing their identity and role with target donor groups, advisors and the public. Working together, community foundations in Michigan are proving that "it's about leveraging our collective strength to benefit each community foundation." i :\dmerserlmcvf\mcfvannualrepot1200 l.doc �Michigan Community Foundations' Ventures Board of Trustees Terms of Office Class of 2004 Brenda L. Hunt, Battle Creek Community Foundation Mariam C. Noland, Community Foundation for Southeastern Michigan Victor J. Papale, Community Foundation of Greater Flint Jeanne Snow, Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation David A. Woodworth, Upper Peninsula Community Foundation Alliance Class of 2003 Jack E. Hopkins, Kalamazoo Community Foundation Diana R. Sieger, Grand Rapids C01mnunity Foundation & CMF Trustee Lucy R. Allen, Saginaw Community Foundation Olivia P. Maynard, Les Cheneaux Community Foundation, & CMF Trustee Sandra J. Dobbins, Marshall Community Foundation Class of 2002 Chris A. McGuigan, Community Foundation for Muskegon County Elizabeth A. Cherin, Fremont Area Community Foundation Patricia A. Reynolds, Capitol Region Community Foundation Robert G. Tambellini, Charlevoix County Community Foundation Neeta Delaney, The Jackson County Community Foundation & CMF Trustee I:\Scuddington\Board ofTrustees\Supporting Org\MCFVTerms200 l.doc � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Community-Foundations Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book community foundations Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book community foundations. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50422 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/fe21c7c40460b53721999ff93f208e7a.pdf 9ecc2bf20f754d295bcdb2dfb7ea43c7 PDF Text Text Board of Trustees Wednesday, October 31, 2001 Marriott Renaissance Detroit Michelangelo, Level 4 8:30 a.m. Breakfast with Staff 9:30 a.m. Board Meeting 11:30 a.m. Adjourn with Board Picture AGENDA L TAB Call to Order C. David Campbell Introduction ofNew Trustees ACTION ITEMS II. Approval of Minutes May 11, 2001 Board ofTrustees Meeting July 23, 2001 Executive Committee Meeting October 2, 2001 Special Board ofTrustees Meeting III. Treasurer's Report Richard Rappleye 2 IV. Investment Committee Robert Swaney, Jr. 3 v. Nominating Committee Maureen Smyth 4 VI. Membership Committee Gil Hudson 5 �Board Meeting Agenda I 0/3 1/0 I Page 2 TAB VII. Supporting Organization Committee Maureen Smyth Michigan AIDS Fund 6 Leonard Smith, Chair Michigan Community Foundations' Ventures Jack Hopkins, Chair VIII. Strategic Planning Vicki Rosenberg 7 REPORTS IX. 29th Annual Conference Julie Cummings 8 X. Learning to Give Russ Mawby 9 XI. President's Report Rob Collier 10 XII. Fuh1re Meeting Dates February 19, 2002 University Club, East Lansing June 15 & 16,2002 Meijer Gardens, Grand Rapids September 30, 2002 Grand Hotel, Mackinac Island XIII. Other Business XIV. Adjournment � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-31_Board-Agenda Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book board agenda Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-31 board book board agenda. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50421 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/f2b7700ecee7762d90b62d34fe9741ff.pdf eccbc4411ac20c8edfa5cad2ba6cdac7 PDF Text Text Minutes of the Meeting of the Board of Trustees Council of Michigan Foundations May 11,2001 The meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF) was held at the Ashman Court Hotel in Midland, Michigan, on Friday, May 11 , 2001 , pursuant to written notice duly given. The meeting was called to order at 8:30a.m. by Margaret A. (Ranny) Riecker, Chair. Trustees and officers present in addition to M s. Riecker: C. David Campbell Olivia (Libby) P. Maynard RobertS. Collier William C. Richardson Kari Schlachtenhaufen Julie F. Cummings Diana R. Sieger Neeta M. Delaney Gerald K. Smith Herbert D. Doan Maureen H. Smyth Lynn A. Feldhouse Ira Strumwasser Richard T. Groos Elizabeth C . Sullivan Gilbert Hudson Amanda Van Dusen Allan D. Gilmour Ann K. Irish Lloyd J. Yeo Russell G. Mawby CMF Staff: Kathryn A. Agard, Executive Director, Learning to Give Project Susan Cuddington, Executive Assistant to the President Jeri L. Fischer, Director of Membership Services Susan Howbert, Director, Family Philanthropy Services, Detroit Office Sandra G. Katt, Assistant Vice President, Corporate Services and Education David R. Lindberg, Vice President of finance & Administration Kari Pardoe, Russell G. Mawby Intern Gail Powers-Schaub, Director of Technology and Informational Services Vicki J. Rosenberg, Vice President & Chief Operating Officer I. ACTION ITEMS Approval of Minutes The minutes of the February 15, 2001 Board of Trustees meeting were presented for approval. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the February 15, 2001 Board of Trustees minutes be accepted as presented. �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes ofMay II , 2001 Page 2 Treasurer ' s Report Dave Lindberg announced that the audit by PriceWaterhouseCoopers had just been completed, and a final report will be mailed under separate cover to the Board. Mr. Lindberg presented the March 31, 2001 Financial Statements for CMF and its two supporting organizations as reviewed by the CMF Audit and Finance Committee. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that Council of Michigan Foundations' Board of Trustees approve the March 31, 2001 Financial Statements as recommended by the CMF Audit and Finance Committee. Endowment Funds Rob Collier discussed the need for additional funds to continue to provide technical assistance to the Community Foundation Youth Advisory Committees across the state of Michigan. While the Mawby Fund for Kids endowment provides some assistance, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation has approved CMF's request to establ ish the MCFYP Endowment Fund, with the remaining funds from the Kellogg Youth Challenge grant funds. He also noted the need to retroactively approve the work of the Executive Committee in creating the Dorothy A. Johnson Education Fund. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approve the establishment of the Michigan Community Foundations' Youth Project (MCFYP) Fund, a permanent endowment fund as approved by the W .K. Kellogg Foundation, by using the grant dollars remaining from the Round 12 challenge grant, with a purpose to support the ongoing technical assistance and training needs of community foundation youth advisory committees in Michigan, And RESOLVED further, that the Board of Trustees approve, retroactively as of November 1999, establishment of the Dorothy A. Johnson Education Fund, as a permanent endowment fund created from the gifts of many foundation and individuals to honor the work of CMF's President Emeritus, Dorothy A. Johnson, with the Fund being used to support speakers for CMF's Annual Conference and special training activities promoting Principles and Best Practices for grantmakers. Investment Report Committee Chair Ted Doan presented the March 31, 2001 Investment Report. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that C ouncil of Michigan Foundations' Board of Trustees accept the March 31, 2001 Investment Report. �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes ofMay II , 2001 Page 3 Nominating Report The Board recognized Ranny Riecker, Chair, for her excellent job leading CMF through its transition period over the past two years. Committee Chair, Maureen Smyth presented the slate of officers for 2001-2002. Rob Collier noted the proposed combination of the Secretary/Treasurer position is in accordance with the CMF Bylaws. The Nominating Committee will evaluate a recommendation to nominate a youth grantmaker to serve on the CMF Board. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the following individuals be elected to the offices as specified, for a one-year term effective May 11, 2001. Chair: Vice Chair- Private Foundations: Vice Chair- Community Foundations: Vice Chair - Corporate: Secretary/Treasurer: President: C. David Campbell President McGregor Fund Julie F. Cummings Trustee The Max M. and Marjorie S. Fisher Foundation Diana R. Sieger, President The Grand Rapids Community Foundation Lynn A. Feldhouse Vice President & Secretary DaimlerChrysler Corporation Fund Richard K. Rappleye Vice President Field Services, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Robert S. Collier Council of Michigan Foundations Membership Report Conm1ittee Chair, Gil Hudson, introduced Jeri Fischer, CMF Director of Membership Services, to present the Membership Committee report. Rob Collier reviewed the CMF Accomplishments document (distributed to the Board at the meeting) that will be sent to all members as part of the membership renewal campaign. The Membership Committee will present a proposed plan for membership renewal at the fall Board Meeting. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the report of the Membership Committee be accepted as presented. �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes ofMay II , 2001 Page 4 Strategic Planning Update Rob Collier highlighted the results of the May 10 Strategic Planning Meeting (PowerPoint presentation attached). The Board discussed and approved the revisions recommended in the purpose statements. Mr. Collier discussed the next steps for Phase II of the Strategic Plan, including the continued involvement of Bob Tobin from the Williams Group. He noted the Strategic Planning process is on schedule for completion and also for presentation to the membership at the 291h Annual Conference in Detroit. Upon motion duly made, supported!, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that $45,000 from the 2000-2001 Core Budget Fund balance be allocated for Phase II of the Strategic Plan. Connect Michigan Alliance Rob Collier requested the Board's counsel regarding CMF's position on the Connect Michigan Alliance, a new statewide nonprofit organization that will be the key entity for promoting volunteerism in Michigan. This Alliance will be funded by the income from a $20 million endowment campaign; a $10 million allocation from the Legislature has been approved and must be matched by the private sector. The Board asked Rob to resign from the Campaign Cabinet due to the fact that a number of CMF members will be asked to financially support this campaign. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees support the creation of the Connect Michigan Alliance as a unique public and private statewide organization to promote, strengthen, and sustain volunteerism for the residents of Michigan. II. DISCUSSION ITEMS 291h Annual Conference Update Conference Program Committee Co-chair Julie Cummings updated the Board on the 291h Annual Conference to be held October 31 - November 2, at the Marriott Renaissance Hotel in Detroit. Jackie Joyner-Kersee & her husband, Bob Kersee, are confirmed plenary speakers. Detroit's 3001h Anniversary will play a large role in the Conference, with Mayor Archer scheduled to open the conference. Family Philanthropy Vice-Chair, Julie Cummings, presented the Family Philanthropy Report and highlighted the upcoming events: the Regional Family Foundation Luncheon in Ann Arbor, the Trustee Leadership Seminar with the Association of Small Foundations in Bloomfield Hills, and the Second Annual Family Foundation Retreat at Crystal Mountain Resort. �CMF Board of Trustees Minutes ofMay II , 2001 Page 5 Learning to Give Report Russ Mawby highlighted the activities of the Learning to Give Project. More than 500 lesson plans have been created by teachers for all grade levels. Many pilot school districts are coming on board, as well as Ferris State University, which offers a Master's Degree with a concentration in philanthropy. The Project has been working with lobbyist, Alcalde & Faye, and as a result, the word "giving" has been added to the definition of the Character Education Bill. "The White House Conference on Philanthropy" videotape, narrated by Paul Newman, has been disseminated to all middle school & high school libraries in the state of Michigan with two lesson plans developed for Project teachers. Because the majority of the Project's funding ends between December 3 1, 200 I and March 31, 2002, the Steering Committee is focusing on future funding strategies. Corporate Services Lynn Feldhouse, Vice Chair Corporate Services, highlighted the philanthropy articles in the latest issue of the Michigan Forward magazine. Ms. Feldhouse announced that she and Mark Neithercut are the newly-appointed Co-chairs of the Detroit Area Grantmakers Committee. President's Report Mr. Collier reviewed the upcoming CMF events included in his written report. Mr. Collier shared that For Good. For Ever. is now federally protected, and he distributed the For Good. For Ever. luggage tags, designed by Williams Group. Susan Howbert reported on the activities of the Detroit office. Trustee Kari Schlachtenhaufen reported that Pat Babcock has been a great asset to the City Connect project. The Board of Trustees held an Executive Session that adjourned at 11:55 a.m. The next scheduled meeting of the CMF Board of Trustees will be held October 31, 2001 , at the Marriott Renaissance Hotel in Detroit, MI. There being no further business to come before the board, Chair, Ranny Riecker adjourned the meeting at 12:00 p.m. and officially presented the gavel to new Chair, Dave Campbell. Margaret A. Riecker, Chair Robert S. Collier, President � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-02_Previous-Board-Minutes Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-02 board book previous board minutes Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-02 board book previous board minutes. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50420 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-02 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d7949749eb6e7cef6d657ba2ef90a30f.pdf 6deb155004eba408a972c3710657dc4e PDF Text Text Council of MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS ~uite 3/0ne South Harbor A\·enue/P.O. Box 'i99/Grand Ha\en. \II 4911~/(6161 H l l-~OHO/h\.\ ((116) H-1.!-1-htl c:mfSlcmif.org • www.cmif org Special Board of Trustees Meeting Tuesday, October 2, 2001 The University Club ofMSU Ballroom 3435 Forest Road East Lansing, MI 48909-7157 (5 17) 353-5111 (Map Enclosed) AGENDA 9:30a.m. TAB Refreshments I. Call to Order C. David Campbell A. Nominating Committee Report Maureen H. Smyth II. Strategic Planning Update Vicki Rosenberg & Bob Tobin Ill. Phase ll Committee & Task Force Reports - Q&A 1 A. Government Relations Olivia P. Maynard Action Items Legislative Statement State Philanthropy Ca11cus 2 B. Education-Networking Elizabeth C. Sullivan Action Item Core Education Framework 3 C. Technology Richard K. Rappleye Action Item Rapid Response System 4 D. Services C. David Campbell Action Items A pilot program for charging fees Establishing a Foundation -serving advisors/clients Policy on serving grantseekers 5 ·~ An Association of Foundations and Corporations Waking Gmnts for Charitable Purposes. �C MF' Board Meeting Agenda October 2, 200 1 Page 2 12:00 p.m. LUNCH Phase II Reports continued ... E. Membership Gilbert Hudson Discussion Items Changes to Membership Categories Membership Plan for 2002- retention and new Confirmation of Benefits of Membership F. Marketing/Communications Neeta M. Delaney Action Items Logo and position statement for CMF 6 7 TV. Policy on Inclusion for CMF: Clarifying our Position & Designing Next Steps Bob Tobin 8 V. Measuring Progress on Strategic Plan Implementation: Revisiting Guiding Questions & Draft Vision Metrics Bob Tobin 9 VI. Next Steps PhaseD planning continues Presentation at November 1 Annual Members Meeting Rob Collier VII. Adjournment Next CMF Board Meeting Wednesday, October 31,2001 9:30 a.m. - 11 :30 a.m. 1 29 h Annual Conference Marriott Detroit Renaissance 10 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-10-02_Board-Agenda Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-02 board book board agenda Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-10-02 board book board agenda. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50419 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-10-02 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/8a04007776901761669f2a212406f623.pdf 1d968dcbfa494e8f1390a5e59a969ae8 PDF Text Text 1 Board of T rustees Strategic Planning Session May 10,2001 I :30 p.m. to 5:00p.m. Ashman Court Hotel Midland, Ml AGENDA 1:00 p.m. Report & Discussion: Work Completed to Date • Data Gathering Results Action: Determine if more data collection is needed and if so, in what areas. o Focus Groups o Member Survey • Situational & Trends Analysis Results Action: Reach consensus on final Vision & Values Statements and on vision metrics and stakeholder perceptions o SWOT Analysis o Vision Statement & Vision Metrics o Values Statements & Stakeholder Perceptions 2:30 p.m. Break 2:45 p.m. Small Group Work: Six Purpose Areas Action: Validate or refine descriptions of each purpose area Develop at least one major goal for each purpose area Group # 1 - Advocate Group #4 - Promote Group #2 - Educate Group #5- Network Group #3 - Lead Group #6- fncrease 3:45p.m. Small Group Reports & Consensus Building Action: Reach consensus on descriptions of/major goal(s) for purpose areas 4:15p.m. Presentation & Discussion oflnfrastructure Goals & Strategies • Marketing & Communications • Education & Net\vorking • Member Services 5:00p.m. Conclude A summary ofthe day 's work will be presented to the Board the next morning, to ensure that those members not present on May J{jh are informed. �2 Summary of CMF 2000/2001 Strategic Planning Process History: Phase I In June 2000, the Board of Trustees approved a strategic planning process and allocated funds to retain the Williams Group (then Williams Marketing) to assist it in that process. Phase I of planning - covering September 2000 through April2001- included Board and Executive Committee meetings, data gathering via focus groups and a Member survey, and intensive staff work. Major accomplishments of Phase I include: • Completion of internal and external factors and trends reported in " Writing the Next Chapter" (Tobin), " Key Trends Affecting CMF" (stall), and the analysis ofCMF's Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats (SWOT) (Board and staff). • Completion and analysis of focus groups and surveys to obtain member input involving: a focus group of eight members from family, corporate. community, and independent foundations in the southeastern region; four focus groups with 19 "next generation" family foundation members, and a Member survey to which 235 members responded. • Completion of a draft strategic plan comprised of a new vision statement, beliefs/values statements, major goals and key strategies to achieve those, and benchmarks or metrics to be used in measuring CMF's success in achieving its new goals. Phase II of the Strategic Plan will occur between May and October 200 I. Key objectives for this phase are: • • • Refining aJI components of the plan based on Board input obtained at its May 2001 meeting. The major focus of the refinement will be finalizing major goals and adding key strategies and tactics to achieve those. Completing a plan for the internal reorganization of CMF to strengthen its infrastructure in support of achieving the new strategic plan. Presenting the plan to members at the Fall 200 1 Annual Conference. �ATTACHMENT A 3 Minutes of March 22. 2001 Executive Committee Strategic Planning Session On March 22, 2001 , members of the Executive Committee, Board and CMF staff, met for a strategic planning session. Vicki Rosenberg opened the meeting and then turned it over to Bob Tobin, who facilitated the session. Data-gathering. The first issue discussed was the status of data-gathering efforts. Members briefly discussed: (1) FERA's report ofthe February 1, 2001 focus group in Detroit that involved nine members representing corporate, independent, fam ily, and community foundations; and (2) the final version of the Member Survey which was distributed to CMF's key contact person in each member organization. As a result of this discussion, members requested that CMF find ways to collect data from "next generation" family foundation members. SWOT Analysis: The second issued discussed was the draft SWOT analysis (SWOT= strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats). Members suggested the following changes to the analysis: • • • • Strengths: (1) change "Michigan's strong base of organized phHanthropy" to Michigan's strong culture of philanthropy; (2) add collegiality; (3) change "comprehensive knowledge" to "global knowledge". Weaknesses (1) add "imbalance of influence and service based on member type and size." Opportunities: (1) add "CMF's roJe as an effective connector of different constituency types". Threats: (I) add "segregating members by type "which members believe threatens member to member exchange and learning; (2) add "for profit competition for members and member services", and (3) change "diminished relationship with state legis lature due to terms limits" to" diminished relationships with state government". Values: The third issue discussed was the list of values drafted by CMF staff. Members suggested the following regarding this Hst: (I) remove "nonpartisanship" and consider replacing it with "neutrality"; (2) add "common good"; (3) keep "servant-leadership"; (4) remove "relationships" because it is implicit in "inclusivity" which was also on the list. Vision: The fo urth issue discussed was a draft vision statement. Members discussed several key ideas to be included in the vis ion statement, including "civility", "common good", and the difference between the work of CMF and the work of its members. A final suggestion was made to revise the statement to read "To engage the citizens of Michigan in effective philanthropy, contributjng to the common good." There was agreement that this was an improvement over the previous version, but needed additional work. Vicki Rosenberg thanked the Committee for its input and assured them that staff would followup on their request to gather data from "next generation" family foundation members and continue working on the SWOT, values, and vision statements for review at the May I 0, 200 I Strategic Planning session in Midland. I ewp vjroscnberg/2001/ExccComm.SummJ-22 �4 ATTACHMENT B Date: April 27, 200 I Ranny Riecker, Chair and Members of the CMF Board of Trustees To: From: Vicki J. Rosenberg Robert S. Collier Re: Summary of Data Gathering Focus Group & Member Survey Introduction In winter 2001, CMF hired Formative Evaluation Research Associates (FERA) to design and implement two data gathering efforts to provide significant member input to the strategic planning process. These included: • A February 1, 2001 focus group held in Detroit with nine CMF members representing independent, community, and family foundations and corporate giving programs ranging in asset size from under 5 million dollars to $100 million or more with I to over I 0 years experience. Members included paid and volunteer staff, trustees, and one donor. • A Member s urvey disseminated to CMF's key contact person, in all487-member organizations, requesting responses from at least two individuals-- a senior staff member and trustee, or, for family foundations, two trustees ifthere were no paid staff. Attachment 2(A) provides aggregate data on: o The importance of and CMF's effectiveness in addressing its six purpose areas; o The importance ofCMF serving as an intermediary o The importance ofCMF sharing information outside of Michigan o Member satisfaction overall ("Are there ways CMF can better serve members?") o Overall value of membership in CMF ("Perceptions of overall value") o ProfiJes of respondents by: ( 1) foundation type, asset size, and years in existence; and (2) respondents' role and years in the field. • In April 200 I, Susan Howbert and Vicki Rosenberg of CMF conducted four " next generation" family foundation focus groups via conference call to obtain these members' unique perspectives. Participants included 18 family members and one staff member. In total, 263 individual members, representing close to 200 foundations, provided direct input into CMF's strategic planning process. A consolidated summary of findings from the February I Focus Group and Member survey follows. A separate summary of the "Next Generation" focus groups and a list of those participants serves as Attachment 2 (B). �5 Summary of Key Findings Overall, the majority of CMF members: • • • • • • • • Get "excellent" or "good" value for their membership Endorse the current mission Need clarification of our purposes, particularly increase, promote, and lead Expect members to be our highest priority, with emphasis on: o Every action being of benefit to members first o Knowing every member and their needs o Meeting every members' needs while recognizing the diversity of those needs o Providing equitable service across membe.r types, asset levels, and location, with the stronger calls coming from corporate givers and famil y foundations Endorse the value of principles and best practices, with emphasis on: o Education o Technical assistance o Dissemination of knowledge developed in Michigan and elsewhere Want improved communication, with a focus on: o Better promotion of CMF o High quality web and print based products o More ways for two-way communication between staff and members o More ways to access infonnation Endorse networking as one of the most valuable purposes, with a focus on: o More issue-focused opportunities relevant for all members regardles:; of type o More opportunities for member-to-member exchange and peer education o Expanded regional and statewide offerings Question the intermediary role, with a focus o n: o The role of members in the decision making process o Costs/benefits to members and CMF o Clarity of connections to mission and purposes The data-gathering also identified tension points around two issues: • Increasing Philanthropy in Michigan. What's the appropriate balance between encouraging and assisting in the creation of new family foundations vs. growing the assets of community foundations? • Membership Growth. What are the costs/benefits of continuous growth in membership on the quality of the membership experience? A fuller presentation of findings will be presented at the Board Strategic Planning Session on May 10. If you would like a full set ofthe data, p lease contact Vicki Rosenberg. �6 Date: April27, 200 1 Ranny Riecker, Chair and Members of the CMF Board of Trustees To: From: Vicki J. Rosenberg Robert S. Collier Summary of Key Findings Next Generation Family Foundation Conference Call Focus Group Series Re: Introduction Between April 17 and 26,200 1, Susan Howbert and Vicki Rosenberg conducted four conference call focus groups invo lving 18 next generation family foundation trustees and one family foundation staff member residing in six states. Our goal was to gather input regarding this group of members' experiences, ideas, and needs to inform the strategic planning process. The calls focused on five key issues: I . How participants first learned about CMF 2. How participants believe CMf has helped them with their philanthropic work 3. How participants believe CMF could improve its support to next generation members 4. How CMF might attract new fam ily foundation members 5. What CMF might consider regarding the strategic planning process Each call was very active, animated and informative, providing us with valuable insights into next generation members' experiences, interests, and needs. Key Findings • • • • Most participants learned about CMF from relatives or friends Most participants placed highest value on CMF for: o Networking and educational opportunities, particularly the annuaJ conference and last year's family foundation retreat. As a result of hearing others' comments about the conference, an out-state member plans to attend her first this year o Resources and publications, particuJarly "how-to guides" to LrUstee respons ibilities and foundation operations o Events that encourage cross-generational discussions among family members. Having issues as focal points of discussions provides common ground for families struggling with communication and control issues All participants identified generational inclusion and transfer of control as their greatest concern Participant requests for new services included: �7 Summary of Key Findings: Next Generation Family Foundation Focus Groups Page2 o o o • • A primer on family foundation trusteeship for next generation members More accessibility to resources via the web More structured opportunities for networking among next generation members in one day or weekend workshops o Workshops on improving communication and trust-building between generations o Delivery of publications to their homes rather than foundation offices Participant ideas for attracting new family foundation members included: o Offering free trial memberships o Asking members to contact nonmembers o Working with advisors to the wealthy and placing ads in trade publications o Offering discounts to first time conference attendees o Offering free conference registration with sponsorship from a member o Offering more retreats/events for family foundations only Participant thoughts for the strategic planning process: • Hold annual conference the ftrst week in October every year • Work with a marketing ftrm to broaden awareness ofCMF • Provide a place on the conference registration form for indicating interest in particular sessions to inform conference planning (repeating popular sessions is one example) • Encourage more diversity among conference speakers • Convene more conference calls for networking and outreach to members -they enjoyed talking with us and their peers! �8 Family Foundations Next Generation Conference Call Focus Group Series Participants Mary Frey Bennett Third Generation Member. The Frey Foundation Robert & Cheryl Binda Trusteec;, Guido A. & Elizabeth H. Binda Foundation Lori Colina-Lee Trustee, Colina Foundation Jennifer Flores Trustee, Harry A. & Margaret D. Towsley Foundation Jomaric Goergc Trustee, Colina Foundation Diane Hullet Trustee, Alden & Vada Dow Fund Carol Paine--McGovern President, Paine Family Foundation Bonnie K. Mills Program Coordinator, A lden and Vada Dow Fund Mark Morley Trustee, Morley Foundation Thomas Paine Trustee, Paine Fami ly Foundation Leann Rowland Secretary/Treasurer, Drake-Quinn Family C haritable Foundation Suz Scbalon-Till mann Secretary. Schalon Foundation Deborah 0. Stephens Director, Ransom Fidelity Company Betsy Upton lover Junior Trustee, Frederick S. Upton Foundation Robin Terry Trustee, Gordy Foundation, Inc. Margaret E. Thompson Trustee. Harry A. & Margaret D. Towsley Foundation Michael M. Upton Trustee, Frederick S. Upton Foundation Ca rrie Byrns Viii Trustee, Frederick S. Upton Foundation I cwp tlcpnr1mcntsi20011Famll~ FdnsJFocus Group 'ih List �FE1tA 9 Formaove Evaluation Research Associates Council of Michigan Foundation's Member Survey 2001 Key Findings The Council of Michigan's Foundation mission is: 196 (86%) Great as is 29 ( 13%) Needs to be refined 2 (I%) Needs to be changed SomeVolue 25% r PoorValue 1% Excellent Value 45% Perceptions of ove.r all value Are there ways CMF can better serve members? Good Value 47% Importance of CMF's Purposes and Effectiveness in each area (N=235) Scale: 1 = Very, 2 = Quite, 3 =Somewhat, 4= Not Too, and 5 = Not At All Importance Effectiveness (Mean) (Mean) 1.4 1.7 1.5 1.9 2.4 2.1 Lead 2. 1 2.2 Network 1.7 2.0 Promote Phtlanthropy 1.7 2.4 2.5 N/A 2. 1 NI A Advocate Educate Increase Resources Serve as lnlcrmcd mry ,__ Sh::~ rc lnformatron CMF M,•mbcr S"'''<'1 lOfJI 1\1'1' Fmcliog' I I I I - -- Page I �FEftA 10 Formam·e Emluation Research Associates CMFPlan Information about Respondents Otha N><6(3%) Pub he Chanty Na9 (4'/o) Types of Respond ants Independent N• 36(15%) 1 l Less than 2 Ycan N~ll (S%) Affiliate N:l S (6%) Cofllorate/Corporatc giving program N"'24 ( 10%) -Community N~S I (35%) Organization Asset Levels In Mlllions SI M ·SSM N><6S(28%) 2toSYcars N=26(11%) Organizations' Ytars in Exlstance 5 to 10 Years N-43 (19*/o) More than 10 Years N• IS2 (66Yo) Yea rs Respondents have Served in Field of Philanthropy 2 to 5 Years N=40(18%) S to 10 Years N=49(21%) Staff Member (68YoCEOs) Respondents' Roles N~129(55%) Trusrce/ Board Member N- 112 (48Yo) C/1/F Memher Sum.'y 200/ Key Findings Page2 �11 ATTACHMENT C Date: April27, 2001 To: Ranny Riecker, Chair and Members of the CMF Board of Trustees From: Vicki J. Rosenberg Robert S. Collier Re: Draft Vision & Values Statements Background The most recent additions to the draft strategic plan are revised draft vision and values statements. These statements reflect input from CMF Staff and Board Members. The vision statement articulates what we hope to achieve by the end of the next five years. We believe that the draft vision is doable, measurable, motivational, and distinctive to CMF. The values statements express what CMF is and hopes to be within the next five years. These statements, developed by Staff and Board Members, will guide our day-to-day work, and, we hope, represent how our members and key stakeholders know us. These statements have evolved from an initial list of six words -- learning, innovation, servantleadership, excellence, inclusivity, and relationships to the four presented below. The explication of each value draws on our beliefs and ties directly to one or more of our six purposes. For ease of reference, the purposes are underlined. Revised Vision Statement: Making Michigan the best state for organized philanthropy. Revised Values Statements We Build Relationships to Last - with our members first- and with the philanthropic, non-profit, private, and public sectors, and the general public second - through advocating and networking. Our goal is to know every member well, to represent every individual engaged in organized, Michigan-based philanthropy, and to include a diverse group of members in our thinking and planning. Our existing and future relationships with leaders in all sectors are built to bring added value to our members individuaJiy and collectively. We Act as a Servant-Leader for organized philanthropy - by promoting and increasing philanthropy in Michigan. We serve by understanding and meeting members' individual needs. We lead by anticipating and then meeting members' collective needs. In this role, we espouse the highest ethical standards. Our success is measured by the health and �12 Draft Vision & Values Statements Page 2 vitality of organized philanthropy in Michigan and by the level of civil society in our state -- now and in the future. We Have, Share, and Seek Knowledge- with members and in support of members through education and networking. Our knowledge is personified by staff with deep expertise in philanthropic principles and best practices worldwide - from the technical to the topical to the philosophical, and with skills in research and communications; by members who continually redefine best practices and represent expertise in a vast array of subjects and on a wide range of issues; and by partners and collaborators who enrich our understanding of the needs for and impact of organized philanthropy. We Strive for Excellence in Everything We Do - through a strong infrastructure-- clear goals, strong leadership, expert staff and effective management systems- that enable us to be nimble, entrepreneurial, and good stewards of our resources. These qualities allow us to provide our members with the best, most comprehensive services avaiJable to organized philanthropy anywhere. We believe to achieve excellence requires CMF as a whole -- each staff member and the Board of Trustees -- to reflect, innovate, communicate, grow, and improve. Our goal is to have all members recognize CMF as the most valuable association to which they belong. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-05-10_Strategic-Planning Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-05-10 board book strategic planning Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-05-10 board book strategic planning. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50418 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-05-10 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/19274c00a0b0d9bc1e5696bb304a8945.pdf c98d40d906cde185675429616b3b166f PDF Text Text ~36 ) Date: April 27,2001 Memo to: Ranny Riecker, Chair, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Rob Coltier & Vicki Rosenberg Re: Additional Support for Strategic Planning Process The fo llowing resolution and background information related to the Strategic Plan is presented for your consideration and action. RESO L VE D tha t $45,000 from the 2000-2001 C ore Budget fund ba la nce be allocated .f or additional stra tegic planning services. Background At the June 2, 2000, Board Meeti ng a resolution was passed approving a one-year contract with Williams Marketing Services of Grand Rapids, now the Williams Group, for $45,000 for strategic planning services. The Strategic Planning process is on schedule for completion and presentation to the membership at the Fall Conference in Detroit. We are pleased with the leadership skills provided by Bob Tobin of the Williams Group for this process. In order to complete this process and allow for Mr. Tobin to assist the staff with implementation task forces, we would like to extend this contract to November 30, 2001 and increase the dollar amount to $72,500. We want to add that Mr. Tobin's planned activities were expanded by his facilitation of three planning days with staff. This has been a valuable learning experience for staff, who have made a significant contribution to this planning process! The balance of $ 17,500 included in this request wi U be used to reimburse FERA (Formative Evaluation Research Associates) of Ann Arbor for their services in leading a focus group of members in February in Detroit and for design, dissemination, and tabulating the membership survey. We look forward to discussing this matter with you and appreciate your participation in the strategic p lanning process. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2001_BB_2001-05-10_Strategic-Planning-Memo Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-05-10 board book strategic planning memo Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2001-05-10 board book strategic planning memo. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50417 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-05-10