177 24 5790 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/7a22e2467d61bf85a5baf53ee08635c5.pdf ccb6e87a7f86d6033f4f985d9fce8e69 PDF Text Text SUGGESTED MEETING DATES FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 22, 1991 FRIDAY, JANUARY 10, 1992 FRIDAY, JANUARY 31, 1992 FRIDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 1992 FRIDAY, MARCH 27, 1992 FRIDAY, APRIL 24, 1992 FRIDAY, MAY 22, 1992 FRIDAY, JUNE 26, 1992 FRIDAY, JULY24, 1992 FRIDAY, AUGUST 28, 1992 FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 25, 1992 FRIDAY, OCTOBER 23, 1992 FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 20, 1992 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1991_CM_1991-10-31_Suggested-Meeting-Dates Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting suggested meeting dates Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting suggested meeting dates. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49411 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1991-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/7ecc3c816fbe21978c1636d54ca00d9b.pdf 954a478e5659add5a43fb585015bca17 PDF Text Text MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION Mrs. Michelle Engler, Chair Michigan Community Service Commission Olds Plaza Building, 4th Floor 111 S. Capitol Avenue P.O. Box 30015 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Mr. Eugene Proctor 2804 Mulford Drive SE Grand Rapids, Michigan 49546 (H) 616-942-1587 (W) 616-456-8593 *Baxter Community Center Mrs. Diana Algra, Ex. Director Michigan Community Service Commission Olds Plaza Building, 4th Floor 111 S. Capitol Avenue P.O. Box 30015 Lansing, Michigan 48909 (W) 517-335-4295 Mr. Darin A. Day 4374 Okemos Rd., Apt. B216 Okemos, Michigan 48864 (H) 517-347-7812 (W) 517-355-8266 (W) 517-353-5038 *MSU Student Dr. Mary Ellen Brandell 619 E. Chippewa Street Mt. Pleasant, Michigan 48858-17 41 (H) 517-773-9403 (W) 517-774-6448 *Central Michigan University Mr. Terry Langston 669 South Wonders Hall Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan 48825 (H) 517-353-2558 (W) 517-353-5038 *MSU Student Dr. Joel Orosz 4300 Old Field Trail Kalamazoo, Michigan 49008 (H) 616-372-3366 (W)616-968-1611 *W.K Kellogg Foundation Ms. Vernie N ethercut 1139 Washington Alpena, Michigan 49707 (H) 517-356-0353 (0) 517-356-9021 ext. 271 *Alpena Community College �Ms. Lisa Hitch Murray Fox Office Center 2211 Woodward Detroit, Michigan 48201-3400 (W)313-983-6420 *Little Caesar Enterprise Mr. Terry Pruitt, Jr. 1469 Allendale Drive Saginaw, Michigan 48603 (H) 517-792-1511 (W) 517-496-8320 *Trustee-Saginaw Area Community Foundation Mr. Henry C. Gaines 2836 Mallery Street Flint, Michigan 48504 (H) 313-232-1672 *Local 559 UAW Ms. Geneva Jones Williams, President United Community Services of Metropolitan Detroit 1212 Griswold Detroit, Michigan 48226-1899 (W) 313-226-9444 *United Community Services Dr. WilliamS. Stavropoulos 5310 Sunset Drive Midland, Michigan 48640 (H) 517-631-7019 *President of Dow USA Mr. Paul Hubbard New Detroit, Inc. One Kennedy Square, Ste. 1000 Detroit, Michigan 48226 *New Detroit President Ms. Judith Reyes 7344 Heyden Detroit, Michigan 48228 (H)313-336-5359 *Madonna University Media Center Dr. John DiBiaggio Office of the President Michigan State University 450 Administration Building East Lansing, Michigan 48824-1046 (W) 517-355-6560 *President of MSU Ms. Judith Riedlinger 24404 Catherine Ind. Novi, Michigan 48375 (H) 313-540-4673 *Small Business Owner Mr. James Kalil 1527 Kinmore Street Dearborn Heights, Michigan 48127 *Retired Command Inspector of Wayne County Sheriffs Office Ms. Dorothy Johnson Council of Michigan Foundation 1 South Harbor Avenue, Ste. 3 P.O. Box599 Grand Haven, Michigan 49417 (W) 616-842-7080 *Council of Michigan Foundation �. t YES AMBASSADORS Cynthia Scherer Olds Plaza Bldg.. , 4th Floor 111 S. Capitol Avenue P.O. Box 30015 Lansing, Michigan 48909 (W) 517-373-1376 *Points of Light Trabian Shorters Olds Plaza Bldg., 4th Floor 111 S. Capitol Avenue P.O. Box 30015 Lansing, Michigan 48909 (W)517-373-0617 *Points of Light DEPARTMENT LIAISON Mr. Doug Stites Michigan Department of Labor Governor's Office on Job Training 201 N. Washington Square Victor Building, 4th Floor Lansing, Michigan 48933 (W) 517 - 373-6227 Ms. Nancy Crandall, Director Office of Services to the Aging 611 W. Ottawa Street P.O. Box 30026 Lansing, Michigan 48909 (W) 517-373-7876 Ms. Roberta Stanley Asst. Supt. for State & Federal Regulations Department of Education Ottawa Street Office Building South Tower 608 West Allegan P.O. Box 30008 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Mr. Joseph Graves Department of Social Services Director of Program Support Family Service Administration P.O. Box 30037 Lansing, Michigan 48909 (W) 517-651-1173 3 �l ' Ms. Elaine Gordon Partnership for Education Department of Education Ottawa Street Office Building South Tower 608 W. Allegan P.O. Box 30008 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Mr. Gary Cass Project Outreach Department of Education Ottawa Street Office Building South Tower 608 West Allegan P.O. Box 30008 Lansing, Michigan 48909 Ms. Teresa Staten Associate Superintendent for Instruction Service Department of Education Ottawa Street Office Building South Tower 608 West Allegan P.O. Box 30008 Lansing, Michigan 48909 4 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1991_CM_1991-10-31_Roster Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting roster Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting roster. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49410 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1991-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/26f42607a70d60d405c9819ab87588e5.pdf e18b036f6cd5a7e01fbb87fc2f61fc67 PDF Text Text National Community Service Act �INTRODUCTION In 1990 embracing the words of the late Martin Luther King Jr ., "Everyone can be great because everyone can serve," Congress passed the National and Community service Act. On November 16, 1990 it was signed into law by the President. To accommodate certain constitutional objections raised by th~ President, the act was amended by P . L. 102-10 and signed into law on March 25, 1991 . A compromise among the Senate, House and Administration the Act was designed to strengthen the American ethic of community service and to help translate this ethic into meaningful action. Under the Act, state and local governments, schools, colleges and nonprofit organizations are eligible to receive funding for full and part time service programs . In the following pages an outline of the Act has been provided. The Act also created the Commission on National Community Service to administer the Act. The Commission was appointed on July 22, 1991. The National Commission met for the first time on September 25, 1991. A second Commission meeting was held on October 20 & 21, 1991. The Commission expects to provide $73 million to eligible service programs in fiscal year 1991, including $22.5 million for school and community based youth and college programs, $22.5 million for youth corps, and $22.5 million for state sponsored full and part time service programs, with $5. 5 million yet to be allocated. Draft regulations regarding the appropriation of funds are expected to be released in mid November. A final draft of the regulations are expected to be ready by mid January of 1992. Applications for the funds will be due shortly after this time. 1 �AN OVERVIEW COMMUNITY SERVICE LEGISLATION A new l egislation and private initiat ives offer a broad r an ge of service opportunities for Amer i can citizens, wi th pri ority on youth and older adults as volunteers. FEDERAL LEGISLATION The National and Community Serv i c e Act of 1990 conta i ns three key Titles: Title I NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE STATE GRANT PROGRAM Provides broad opportunities for service state. Programs funded include those for college students, and school drop-outs . available for full- and part-time service over the age of 15. by citizens o f a school-aged youth , Also, fund i ng is corps for person s Authorizations (Note: the FY 1991 appropriation for a ll programs matches the authorization): $ 56 million in FY 1991 $ 95.5 million in FY 1992 $105 million in FY 1993 Title II MODIFICATION OF EXISTING PROGRAMS Requires the federal Department of Education to work wi t h institutions of higher education to more widely publicize the student loan deferral program that encourages college graduates to serve in nonprofit organizations . Also t he legislation creates Youthbuild, a program that involved youn g people in the building and rehabilitation of home and servic e sites (providing health, recreation, child care) for lowincome families. Authorizations: $1 million in FY 1991 $2 million in FY 1992 $5 million in FY 1993 2 �Title III POINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION Authorizes a new private quasi-governmental foundation , closely associated with the activities of the White House , to stimulate service geared toward significant social problems. T·,.;o initiatives already supported are "StarServe '' and the "One to One Project." Authorizations $ 5 million in FY 1991 $ 7 million in FY 1992 $10 million 1n FY 1993 The grant programs are administered by a Federal Commissi on on National Service. The members of the Commiss1on are aooo1nted b y the P~esident. !he Commission will establish the rules and regulations regarding the applications for funding and t he evalua:ion criteria of the funded programs. ANALYSIS The next section questions: I 1 1 1 I analyzes the legislation answering these What is the overall intent? What funding is available? How can organizations receive funds? What types of programs can be funded? What special requirements or priorities must be included in the programs? 3 �ACLOSER LOOK NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE ACT TITLE I NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE STATE GRANT PROGRAM Intent. This grant program is designed to expand oppcrtuni ties for citizens in their communi t i es , with priority given to involving youth and older Americans. serv1c e spec i a l Funding. $54 million is authorized for FY 1991 for the state gran t program. States are required to provide a 10% match in FY 1 9 91 , a 20% match in FY 1992, and a 30% match in FY 1993. States may apply to the Commission on National service to fund an y or all of the programs authorized in the legislation. If states do not apply for funds, then local agencies may apply directly to th e National Commission for funding of certain program. These ar e identified in the description that follow. Program. Programs created under this Title represent a continuum o f service opportunities for youth, college students and young adults , and older Americans. The programs include school-based and community partnerships, college service programs, and full- an d part-time human service and conservation corps. SCHOOL-AGED SERVICE FOR STUDENTS AND OUT-OF-SCHOOL YOUTH Intent. The goal of this program is to provide all young people with an opportunity to serve their community, whether they are students or have dropped out of school. The legislation also encourages adults to become more involved as volunteers in schools. Funding. A total of $16.5 million is authorized for this program and the higher education program (a description of this program follows). The Commission on National Service will decide what portion of the funds will be available to states for the schoolaged service program. Funds for this program will be administered by the state departme~t of education and are allocated to states based on one of two criteria: 1) if the annual appropriation is less than S20 million, then states apply directly to the Commission for funding on a competitive basis; or 2) if the appropriation is more than $20 million, then the funds are allocated to states according to a formula. If states do not offer school-aged service programs and do not apply to the National Commission for funding, then local agencies may apply directly to the Commission for local program support. 4 �Funds may be used to pay for the supervision of participants, program administration, training, transportation, insurance, and reimbursement for the out-of-pocket expenses of participants. Program. Programs and activities that may be funded under this section are: 1 State planning and capacitv building. States may use 10% of the funds received under this section to improve the ability of their agencies and communities to deliver volunteer service programs. Funding can be used for training , design of service-learning curriculum, research and evaluation, and outreach and dissemination of information. These activities can be delivered by the state department of education or by contract to other agencies. I School-based service learning programs. At least 60% of a state's grant under this section must provide assistance to local applicants for the implementation, operation, or expansion of school-based service learning programs. servicelearning programs must: • Provide students with an opportunity to learn and develop through active participation in thoughtfully organized service experiences that meet actual community needs and that are coordinated in collaboration with the school and community; • Be integrated into the students' academic curriculum and provide structured time for a student to think, talk or write about what the student did or saw during the service activity; • Equip students to use newly acquired skills and knowledge in real-life situations in their own communities; and • Enhance what is taught in school by extending student learning beyond the classroom and into the community and to help foster the developm~nt of a sense of caring for others. Grants are available to partnerships of local educational agencies and community organizations. The partnerships must include a nonprofit organization and may include a for-profit business. 5 �I Community service Programs targeted to out-of-sch o o l yout h. These funds are earmarked for you~g people who fall outsi d e the school system, using positive service experiences a s incentives to get them back into school. At least 15% of a state grant must be used to fund these communi ty -bas ed programs for youth. Partners must be public or pri v a t e nonprofit organizations that will make service opportun i t ies available. Schools and for-profit businesses can be involv e d in the program. I School-based adult volunteer and partnership prooram. Not more than 10% of these funds are earmarked for programs t h a t involve adult volunteers within the school system , especial ly those that include a partnership with a business group a nd benefit disadvantaged youth . Educational agencies must be involved in the partnership . Other partners can be public or organizations or for-profit businesses. private nonprofi t Requirements. Eligible programs must meet specific criteri a outlined in the legislation. Many of the requirements reflec t "principles of good practice" identified by practitioners an d academicians in the fields of education, youth development , community development and voluntarism (refer to the program section, pgs. 25-26). For example, priority will be given t o school-based service learning and community service programs tha t involve participants in the program design, target low-income yout h and involve students from diverse backgrounds, are integrated into the academic program, and focus on substance abuse or school dropout prevention. With regard to adult volunteer programs , priority will be given to applications that involve older Americans or parents as volunteers; include business as a partner; and focus on substance abuse and school dropout prevention, nutrition education, or the improvement of basic skills and reduction of illiteracy. Also, programs must explain how local partnerships will be developed, the extent to which disadvantaged children receive services, and the training and supervisory elements of the program. HIGHER EDUCATION INNOVATIVE PROJECTS FOR COHHUNITY SERVICE Intent. The purpose of this program is to encourage the involvement of young people in community service during their college years. 6 �Funding. There is no separate appropriation for the Higher Education Innovative Projects. Funds for these projects are part of the allocation for the school-aged service programs. The exact amount available for this program will be determined by the National Commission on Service. Application for funding are made directly to the National Commission and applicants must demonstrate either an in-kind or cash match equal to 50% of the grant. Program. The range of activities that may be funded is broad , including community service projects designed by students, service integrated into the college curriculum, and training for teacher s and other community leaders on how to design and implement service programs. Program applicants may be either higher education institutions or public and private nonprofit organizations working in partnership with higher education institutions. FULL-TIME YOUT.ff SERVICE CORPS Intent. This program encourages the expansion of full-time or summer youth human service or conservation corps for young adults ( 15-25 years of age). Corps programs are comprehensive and meet participants' educational, social, and employment needs. Funding. The FY 1991 authorization is $16.5 million . States and several federal agencies (including the Secretary of Agriculture, the Secretary of the Interior, and the Director of ACTION ) are eligible to apply for grants from the Commission. If a· state does not apply for funding, local agencies may apply directly to the Commission. federal funds may not exceed 75% of the total program costs. Program. Full-time youth corps programs provide involve young people, ages 16-25 a living allowance and training and education services. The summer programs are limited to youth 15-21 years of age. Priority in both programs is given to indi victuals without high school diplomas and disadvantaged youth. The legislation encourages the development of youth corps to perform a variety of activities. Conservation corps undertake such projects as: the conservation and rehabilitation of wildlife, parks and recreation areas; tree planting in rural and urban areas; road and trail maintenance; emergency relief for natural disasters; energy conservation; and improving access to public facilities for persons with disabilities. Human service corps activities include work in governmental agencies, nursing homes, senior citizen centers, child care centers, schools, and nonprofit social service agencies. Of particular importance are projects that improve public facilities, provide literacy training to the economically disadvantaged, teach drug and alcohol use awareness, and address issues of poverty. 7 �Funds are provided for pre-service, in-service, and post-service training and educational opportunities. Programs may anroll a limited number of participants who would otherwise not be eligible to participate, but who possess unique skills related to the projects of the corps. These people may include older Americans. Programs may use 2% of the funds to conduct joint programs with senior citizen's organization to serve as mentors for corps members. NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE Intent. This section of the legislation authorizes demonstration projects that provide service opportunities for adults (17 years of age and over) who do not meet the eligibility requirements of the human service/conservation corps programs, specifically employed adults and college-bound youth. There is a special· emphasis on involving order Americans in volunteer service. Funding. The FY 1991 authorization for this program $16.8 million. States must apply to the National Commission for funding. The application may be part of a single grant request under the National and Community Service Act of 1990. The states must pay $2,500 for full-time and $1,000 for part-time participants, an amount which will be matched by the National Commission. In FY 1991, only eight states will be eligible to receive funding for demonstration projects. Program. Participants will perform services that meet either educational, human, environmental, or public safety needs, especially those related to poverty. States may limit the type of service to a particular category of need, consistent with state priorities. There are three options for state programs, which may be administered through grants or contracts to public or private nonprofit organizations (at least two of the states receiving funding must include all three types of programs): 1 Full-time. Participants perform community service for either one or two years, serving not less than 40 hours per week. They must have a high school diploma or agree to achieve the equivalent during the service period. They will receive a living wage stipend and a post-service benefit of $5,000 per year of service, with half paid by the Commission and half by the state. The benefit must be used to pay for student loans, education, or training. 1 Part-time. Participants perform community service for not less than three years, serving two weekends each month and two weeks during the year. Priority is given to applicants who are currently employed. A post-service benefit of $2,000 is paid annually, half from the Commission and half from the state. The benefit must be used for a first home, or payment of student loans or tuition for postsecondary education. 8 �I Special Senior Service. Participants over 60 years of age may in demonstration service projects. If volunteering full-time, they are eligible for the living wage stipend; if part-time, volunteers may receive a pro-rated stipend. These volunteers are not eligible for the postservice benefit. ~articipate INNOVATIVE AND DE}10NSTRATION PROGRAMS AND PROJECTS Intent. This section of the legislation expands volunteer activities beyond the school and community-based partnerships , full- and part-time service corps, and national demonstrati on projects. Model programs are also created that serve Peace Srops and VISTA volunteers, youth living in rural communities , an d retired persons. Funding. Congress created but did not authorize funding for t hese special programs. I~ the event that funding becomes available , the Commission on National Service will award the grants. Program. Program legislation are: areas created under this section of the I Governor' Innovative Service Programs. States may apply for grants to develop demonstration projects, conduct research, and provide technical assistance, training, and staff development to expand service programs. I Peace Corps. The Commission may make grants to the of the Peace Corps or ACTION to fund the last two undergraduate study for fifty college students. In for the education benefit, the students serve three Peace Corps or VISTA volunteers. I Additional volunteer programs. The Commission may provide funding for a variety of model service programs involving youth in rural communities, connecting foster grandparents with Head Start programs, and developing employer-based retiree volunteer programs. TITLE II director years of exchange years as MODIFICATION OF EXISTING PROGRAMS Intent. This Title creates "Youthbuild," a program that involves young people in the rehabilitation of housing or community facilities. In addition, this Title requires the federal government to actively publicize a student loan deferment program for college graduates involved in community service. Funding. In FY 1991, $1 million is authorized for the federal ACTION agency to expand Youthbuild. There is no funding authorized for the education campaign to promote the student loan deferment. 9 �• Program. Youthbuild provides disadvantaged young adults with opportunities to meet the needs of the homeless and low-income families while acquiring valuable job skills. Youth participants rehabilitate housing for the homeless or community facilities that provide health, education, and social services for low-income people. Participants must be between 16-24 years of age, have dropped out of school, and have reading and mathematics skills below the 8th grade level. Full-time participants serve between 6 and 18 months and receive a living wage stipend. Program. Peace Corps and VISTA volunteers are able to defer payments or student loans while they are participating in the service program. Although a similar provision applies to certain college graduates working in a nonprofit organization, very few students take advantage of the program because it is not widely publicized. The legislation requires the Department of Education to publicize the deferment to students and college financial aid offices. Nonprofit organizations may receive the information by contacting local college financial aid offices. TITLE III POINTS OF LIGHT FOUNDATION Intent. the legislation fulfills the President's commitment to expanding volunteer service activities by creating a private quasigovernmental foundation. The Points of Light Foundation will work with the White House Office of National Service. Funding. The FY 1991, $5 million was authorized for the Points o: Light Foundation. Program. The Foundation will serve as a catalyst to expand the public commitment to voluntarism through increased media coverage and by connecting the private sector to specific initiatives. 10 �KEY POLICY ISSUES There are several key policy issues t hat program spons o rs a nd policy leaders must address in order to de ve lo p strong collaborative proposals. These are leaders hi p , program pri orit i es , and f unding . In this section, key i ssues are identified that mus t be cons i dered in the development of serv i ce programs . STATE LEADERSHIP Very few states ha ve experience in supporti ng statew i de volunteer service initiat i ves . Less than twelve states current ly fund service programs . In those states where volunteer service i s a priority , support from the governor, legislature , and top a ge ncy officials have been key. The involvement of communit y-base d organizations have also been crucial. Their participation has allowed states to develop more comprehensive programs that resp ond to community needs and involve large numbers of volunteers . Role of state ~overnment . The federal legislation allows states to submit a single application to the National Commission for fund i ng of the school-based programs, full- and part-time service corps , and national demonstration projects. If states do not submit a n application, then the legislation allows local agencies to appl y directly to the Commission for funding . Since funding for the programs is very limited, many states may not respond to th e initiative. State aoolication for federal funds. If they apply for the federal funding, governors must designate the state agency or agencies responsible for submitting the application for funds . The legislation allows, but does not require states to submit a "single" state application for funding . This provision allows a variety of state agencies to submit requests for the various programs. In fact, the legislation requires funding for schoolaged children to be administered by the state department of education, but it does not require the department of education to administer the other programs. In Pennsylvania, where the key official responsible for volunteer service is the secretary of labor and industry, the state program is oriented toward a full-time youth corps . If no single agency is designated to develop the comprehensive plan, then coordination will be a key issue. In developing the application, the following criteria need to be considered in the state strategy: 11 �I Support for a continuum of service that invites partic i pat i on by people of all ages. I Recognition of the role of community-based organ i zation, as experts in working with volunteers and providers of servi ces . I Integration of service as a response to critica l state a nd community needs. I Involvement of young volunteers. people, older Americans , and act i ve Note: Applications for the college-based program must be ma C..e directly to the National Commission. Most of these applicati ons will be made by institutions of higher education, althoug h community-based agencies may also apply for funding. Colle ge programs should complement the overall strategy, resulting in a coherent system allowing young people to volunteer at any age. Coordination and consultation with interested parties. The legislation encourages states to appoint a state advisor y committee. If a state advisory committee is designated, the n membership on the committee should be broad and diverse. In addition, strong state application will depend on the involvemen t of all key payers in both designing the application and deliverin g the programs. Enhancing private ini tia ti ves. State strategies shculd invol ve leaders from programs funded through private initiatives. Stat e plans should complement these efforts by enhancing but no t duplicating these programs. COMMUNITY LEADERSHIP Leadership for the creation of service program must be developed a t the community level. The strength of the state applications for funding will rely on the ability of communities to involve a large number of people and organizations in the planning process, develop a service strategy that reflects a continuum of service opportunities for people of all ages, and maximize public and private funds from the local, state, and national levels. Developing local programs -- apolrinq to the state for funding . Local communities will need to work with the state agency or agencies responsible for submitting the application to the National Commission for federal funds. The success of community plans will depend on the participation of agencies which have a track record in the development of volunteer and yo uth development programs. The most competitive proposals will be those that demonstrate collaboration among agencies, and those that coordinate services and programs for children, youth, and older adults . .12 �Coordination and consultation. The federal legislation requires communities to form local advisory commi~tees in order to receive funding for the school- and community-based programs. The advisory committee must include representatives of community-based agencies , those receiving service, youth serving agencies, youth, parents, teachers, school administrators, agencies that serve older adults, school board members, labor, and business. The role of the committee could be expanded to provide leadership on the development of programs in response to the other initiatives. PROGRAM AND FUNDING PRIORITIES States and communities will need to identify priorit:es programs and funding as service initiatives are developed . federal legislation gives broad discretion to the states identify priorities. A key issue for states will be whether operate programs statewide and manage the limited funds at state level or target the funds to community-based programs. for The to to the Program strategies. The federal legislation does not mandate program priorities, however the National Commission is required to give priority to school- and community-based programs that focus on substance abuse or school dropout prevention. Therefore, states could target the federal funds toward programs that respond to pressing state priori ties. For example, states may view the service initiatives as part of an effort to increase the effectiveness of public education. Others may choose to target the service funds toward "youth at-risk" programs that combine service with job skill development and employment training. Funding strategies. States and communities will receive funding for the private initiatives directly from the sponsoring agencies. With regard to the federal funding, the legislation does not stipulate how funds will be spent at the local level. States may follow a competitive bid process and conceivably could fund very few projects; or states could decide to operate statewide programs that don' t target the funds to the communities but respond to statewide priorities. 13 �NATIONAL RESOURCE AND COLLABORATION ORGANIZATION ACTION 1100 Vermont Ave. NW Washington, DC 20525 202-634-9135 Jean Burkhardt, Consultant 709A W. 25th Street Minneapolis, MN 55405 612-870-7338 Campus Compact 25 George St., Box 1975 Providence, RI 02912 401-863-1119 Campus Outreach Opportunity League (COOL) 386 McNeal Hall, University of Minnesota St. Paul, MN 55108-1011 612-624-3018 The Congressional Award 6520 Georgetown Pike McLean, VA 22101 703-761-6150 703-761-6154 (fax) Council of Chief State School Officers 400 North Capitol NW, Suite 379 Washington, DC 20001 202-393-8159 Federal Student Aid Program P.O. Box 84 Washington, DC 20044 1-800-333-4630 Fund for the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE) 7th and D Street SW, Room 3100 Washington, DC 20202-5175 202-732-5750 The Independent Sector 1828 L St. NW Washington, DC 20036 202-223-8100 14 �The Johnson Foundation Inc. Racine, WI 53401-0547 414-681-3344 414-681-3325 (fax) National Association of service and Conservation Corps 1001 Connecticut Ave. NW, Suite 827 Washington, DC 20036 202-331-9647 National Crime Prevention Council 1700 K St. NW, 2nd Floor Washington, DC 20006 202-466-6272 National Governors Association 444 North Capitol St., Suite 250 Washington, DC 20001-1572 202-624-5300 National Youth Leadership Council 386 McNeal Hall 1985 Buford Ave. St. Paul, MN 55108 612-631-3672 Office of National Service White House Old Executive Office Building, Room 100 Washington, DC 20500 202-456-6266 One to One Project 2550 M Street NW, Suite 500 Washington, DC 200337 202-862-0121 202-728-0935 (fax) People for the American Way 2000 M St., NW #400 Washington, DC 20006 202-467-4999 Points of Light Foundation 736 Jackson Place NW Washington, DC 20006 202-408-5162 The President's Volunteer Action Awards P.O. Box 37488 Washington, DC 20013 15 �• Public/Private Ventures 399 Market Street Philadelphia, PA 19106-2178 215-592-9099 Seabreeze Awards National Assembly of National Voluntary Health and Socia l Welf ar e Organization 1319 F Street NW, Suite 601 Washington , DC 20004 202-347-2080 StarServe 701 Santa Monica Bl vd., Suite 220 Santa Monica, CA 90401 213-452-1414 United Way of America 701 North Fairfax Street Alexandria, VA 22314 703-836-7100 Yoshiyama Award Hitachi Foundation 1509 22nd St. NW washington, DC 20037 202-457-0588 Youth Service America 1319 F Street NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20004 202-783-8855 202-347-2603 (fax) Youth Service America Youth Volunteer Corps of America 1080 washington Kansas City, MO 64105-2216 816-474-5761 816-472-4207 (fax) VOLUNTEER - The National Center 1111 North 19th St . , Suite 500 Arlington, VA 22209 703-276-0542 16 �COMMISSION OF NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE. P.L. 101-610 woul d establish a Commi::>sion to administer certain programs authorized by the bill. The bill would also establish a Board of Directors . The President would appoint, with Senate Confirmation, 21 individuals to the Board. The Board would have to include seven individual s nominated by the Speaker of the House and seven individuals nominated by the Majority Leader of the Senate. Membership on the Board would have to be balanced according to race, ethnicity, age and gender. Not more than eleven members could belong to the same political party. P.L. 102-10 changes that part of P.L. 101-610 which purported t o limit the President's authority under the appointments clause of the Constitution by mandating Congressional participation i~ the appointment of Commission members and prescribing the Commission 's composition. As amended, the law provides that only the President may make appointments to the Commission. And while no prescription is made as to the Commission's composition, the President is encouraged to appoint members with experience in community service and who represent diversity in terms of experience, age, race, ethnicity and political affiliation. The Commission's duties would include designing and administering the new programs under the Act, arranging for the evaluation of these programs, and advising the President and Congress about developments in community service. The Board could delegate authority to administer these programs to any agency or entity of the Federal government. As amended by P.L. 102-10, each member of the board shall serve for a term of three years, except that seven of the initial members shall serve for one year and seven shall serve for 2 years. The President, acting through the Commission, would be authorized to make Presidential awards to: (1) individuals for outstanding community service; ( 2) outstanding service programs; ( 3) outstanding teachers in service-learning programs. In addition, the President would be required, by January 1, 1992, to submit, to specified Congressional committees, a report recommending improvement of the administration and coordination of service programs administered by ACTION, the Commission, and other Federal entities. 17 �• Sec. 437. (1) The appropriation in section 101 for administration of the national and community service commission program in the department of labor is based on the expectation that federal funding will be available to finance the program for the entire fiscal year. (2) The appropriation in section 10 1 to the national community service commission grants shall be distributed after the department of labor, in conjunction with the department of natural resources, the department of education, and the department of social services, submits an application to the United States department of education for federal dollars authorized under the national and community service act of 1990. Public Law 101-610, 104 Stat. 3127. Within 30 days after submission of the application, the department of labor shall send a copy of the application to the regulatory subcommittees of the house and senate appropriations committees and the house and senate fiscal agencies. (3) Within 7 days after the department of labor receives the decision of the United States department of education regarding the application described in subsection (1), the department shall notify the regulatory subcommittees of the house and senate appropriations committees of the decision. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1991_CM_1991-10-31_National-Community-Service-Act Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting National Community Service Act Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting National Community Service Act. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49409 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1991-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/b53d55e56ef336a46b25f2612acff372.pdf 308e6cdf9fb5795a097ece0c4114ffce PDF Text Text MEMORANDUM lD: FROM: Frank Dirk DATE: August 19, 1 RE: Draft Recommendations to the Michigan youth service commission As promised you will find a compilation of the work produced during the June youth service conference and the subsequent planning meetings. This includes an outline of · proposed recommendations for the state youth service plan. I have also included a copy of the UCS survey that Geneva Williams mentioned on July 15. I will revise this draft document based on the comments that I receive from you. A final report will be submitted to the state youth service commission in early September to serve as both background and base for their planning. Youth Service America will continue to provide technical assistance to the commission through the end of the year. The fmal report will contain more detailed recommendations than those contained in this draft. The final recommendations will include technical reference to provisions contained in the Act. The outline before you however reflects the basic tone and approach accepted by a consensus of the members of the planning meetings. Please feel free to raise whatever questions or concerns that you may have regarding the outline. The final report will also contain extensive appendixes that include the written comments submitted at the July 31 meeting, copies of the letters sent to the Nonprofit Forum. the most current summary of strategies adopted by other states, and certain survey instruments. If there is anything else that you believe should be included. please let me know. Sixteen of the National Commission members have been confirmed by the Senate. We anticipate that they will meet soon to discuss administrative requirements. We still expect that FY91 funds will be carried over. We estimate that the application process should begin well into the Fall. The extra time will help to strengthen Michigan's efforts. With a Governor's Commission, the fine support of the First Lady, two Youth Ambassadors from the Points of Light Foundation, and the impressive work of each of the contributors this planning and development effort the state is well on the way to making youth service an enduring pan of life in Michigan We will try to get the final report to the state commission by no later than September 10. Please tty to get your comments to me by September 4. You can call or write to me with your comments and further suggestions at: (202) 783-8855 Youth Service America 1319 F Street N.W. Suite 900 Washington, D.C. 20004 �INTEREST GROUP CAUCUS DISCUSSIONS Groups from five youth service interest areas, Community-Based Organizations, K-12, Service and Conservation Corps, Higher Education, and Youth Involvement, met to discuss youth service issues in their respective fields and opportunities for program development Below is a summary their recommendations. COMMUNITY BASED ORGANIZATIONS The group representing Community-Based Organizations began their discussion by identifying common goals. They were most interested with developing means for drawing youth into their organizations. They recognized youth service as both a method of youth development and a practical approach for recruiting youth into their organizations. Common Goals: • • • • • • • • Design a system that values young people as resources Promote educational development and growth Encourage young people to commit to community service Involve young people in issue areas that concern them Recognize service as pan of personal development Identify collaboration links and program resources Expand positive opportunities for young people Recognize the shon- and long-term value of youth service The group produced a ten point list for developing opponunities for youth service. The group emphasized the imponance of training and state-wide, inter-organizational network development They also stressed the imponance of providing meaningful opponunities for youth to share in this process. There should be a sustained and coordinated connection between youth service programs and broader volunteer efforts. Points for DevelQpment: • • • • • • • • • • Training programs for adults, youth, and agencies Inter-organizational information networks Youth Ownership Community agency ownership Long-tcrnl, broad-based community suppon Instirutionalize youth service Evalua~e individual and state-wide programs Voluntecl' Recognition Criteria for program development Link youth service and other voluntary efforts Limited training, staffing, and funding are seen as challenges to attaining these goals. Young people must also have visible leadership roles.. The task of increasing youth leadership opportunities in these effons without causing concern among adults in established roles requires careful attention. �Challenges: • • • • • • Limited training resources Limited staff Creating youth ownership Turf issues Limited funding Involving youth who are not students K-12 EDUCATION This group looked at ways of institutionalizing service in the schools. Common Goals: • • • Service opportunities in every middle and high school Service integrated into the curriculum Service as an important consideration for college admission Each local school program should be allowed to develop according to its owns needs. However, all schools should participate in the public promotion of youth service, emphasize multi-cultural programming, and establish formal evaluation processes. Workshops and conferences should be conducted for youth and agency contacts. Transportation assistance and liability coverage issues require further consideration. Points for Development: • • • • • • • • Create local ownership by principals, counselors, teachers and students Promote model programs Emphasize multi-cultural programs Develop means for qualitative program evaluation Conduct workshops for schools and agencies on collaborative youth service program development State conferences for young people involved in community service programs Develop a transportation infastructure Establish a standard policy for volunteer liability SERVICE AND CONSERVATION CORPS This group concentrated on new directions for corps programs. Sustained funding is a major concern. 'The group recommended that a bipartisan swe commission on youth service explore creative funding strategies drawing on public and private resources. Future program viability will also depend on strong local community support, including the private sector. Youth service needs greater recognition; a leader and spokesperson to carry the youth service message across the state. On a more philosophical level. the definition of youth service must be inclusive. �Points for Development: • • • • • • • • • • Joint (MCC/NBA) use and development of resources and programs Create a state-wide youth corps advisory council Involve educators in corps efforts Increase leveraging of JTPA, Vocational Education, CDBG, and Vocational Rehabilitation funds Develop overall (MCCINBA) coordination Identify a spokesperson for youth service Explore the feasibility of a state-wide youth service corporation Create a bipartisan state commission with representatives from corporations, corps, community-based organizations, foundations, youth, labor, and state agencies Involve the private sector in funding, personnel, training, and mentoring Improve private sector local suppon Additional Points: • • Ensure that the definition of service includes corps programs Explore broad collaborations based on more than those suggested in the National and Community Service Act HIGHER EDUCATION Representatives from colleges and universities drew up a list of imponant points that will advance service in their instirutions. Youth community service should be fully integrated into all aspects of campus life. Colleges and universities should increase their collaboration with other organizations that are involved in youth service. Special emphasis should be made in linking campuses to the communities around them. Training workshops and community service programs on all campuses throughout the state are also priorities. Points for Develm>ment: • • • • • • • • Push for a Governor's comprehensive youth service plan Promote an integrated service cmriculum Promote service research Promote collaborative programs with K-12, teacher training, community activities, and youth leadership Create new service approaches such as: College srudent corps programs Involving non-traditional srudents Internships Develop active programs on all Michigan campuses Use college students in building other programs Instirutionalize service learning in the university structure YQU1H INYOL YEMENI The youth attending the conference came up with three broad categories of interest: service opponunities. quality and quantity of programs, and ways to instill a lifetime ethic of service. �Organizations should work collaborativly to establish regional and state networks and clearinghouses to assist in spreading information. Increased youth involvement in policy development and implementation would allow young people to feel a sense of ownership in their programs. Greater participant diversity will improve the educational value of programs. Common Goals: • • • • • Create a state-wide Volunteer Clearinghouse Agency that would promote: Infonnation and dissemination on youth service Program networking Volunteer recognition Local and regional clearinghouses State and community coalition building Youth involvement in policy development and implementation Diversity of participants Service and Conservation Corps, school-based, mentoring, and community-based programs should be expanded. Broader training opportunities and common quality standards for all programs are imponant. Points for Development: • • • • • • • Expand service and conservation corps programs Improve school based programs: Integrate service into the curriculum Train school coordinators aware of service opportunities Strengthen community-based programs Develop collaborative models among community-based programs, service corps, and school programs Develop mentoring programs: Students as mentors Peer to peer relationships Link service reflection to learning about relevant social issues Broadly implement quality standards accepted by the youth service field The development of a lifetime ethic of service is an overarching goal. The importance of youth service, for the community and young people should be demonstrated by recognizing achievement, forgiving and/or deferring student loans, and promoting career opponunities in the non-profit, public service sector. PromorinK a Lifetime Commitment: • • • • A wards and recognition Loan forgiveness and deferral for students involved Evaluation and reflection which allow young people to understand the significance of their actions Encouragement of youth to enter careers in the non-profit and public service sector. �COLLABORATION CAUCUS GROUP DISCUSSIONS On the second day conference participants were divided into four inter-interest groups to collaborativly explore future directions for youth service in Michigan. The recommendations of the four groups shared similar themes. Therefore the summary combines group repons into three thematic categories: diversity, youth leadership, and educational issues. DIVERSITY Youth service programs should emphasize diverse participation. Diversity should reflect gender, age, culture, race, and class. Intergenerational and mentoring programs are important models with which to connect. The caucus groups indicated that young people, Native Americans, youth service program operators, and people from northern communities and Detroit should have greater representation in future youth service activities. Increase Participation of: • • • • • Youth, including at-risk Metro Detroit Northern Communities Native American communities Youth service program operators Consider Linkin&: • • • • Intergenerational projects Mentoring programs Joint projects (Higher Ed. and K-12) Collaborative community action councils YOUTH LEADERSHIP Community agencies must develop and display ttust in young people. Community organizations and schools should be encouraged to take risks and try new things to involve young people. Public relations campaigns to highlight positive contributions of youth service can improve perceptions about the value of youth contributions to the community. Agencies shouJd create development tracks for young people to grow into positions responsibility. Young people should be involved in program planning. Youth should be allowed to share in program ownership by contributing to projects from inception through implementation. Youth involvement should not be limited to established youth leaders. Youth service can develop new leaders among young people. Enhancin& Community A&ency-youth Relations: • • • • Give project operators and schools room to try new things Create a broad range of opponunities for youth Promote youth accomplishments Establish local advisory groups to ensure projects meet local needs �• Develop roles for young people that allow them to grow in responsibility Advancine Youth Leadership Opportunities: • • • • Young people should be seen as resources Young people need to be able to advance issues and ideas of interest to them Development of Youth Action Councils Establishment of regular youth conferences and workshops Mini-grants to fund innovative ideas Use service as an opponunity to develop new youth leaders EDUCATIONAL ISSUES A important goal of youth service is to teach civic responsibility. The concept of service needs to be expanded to include various types of programs. Service must become a part of the curriculum. Goals: • • • Instilling civic responsibility as goal of youth service should be emphasized in all service reflection activities Use service to enhance the teaching of values Expand the definition of service to allow all communities to participate Points for DevelQpment: • • Expand to view of educators to include the world outside the classroom Integrate service into the curriculum �COLLABORATION CAUCUS RECOMMENDATIONS SHORT-TERM The most important step for Michigan take at this time is the formation of an advisory committee to determine the state's plan for applying for federal funds available through the National and Community Service Act of 1990. The committee should decide on goals and draft a comprehensive proposal for the federal funding. The committee should seek reaction from various organizations and individuals before submitting the application and continue to seek the advice and counsel of program practitioners in future initiatives. Goals of steerin~ committee: • • • • Review notes from conference Draft proposal of state-wide youth service plan Circulate proposal to various groups Draft final plan for federal funds and long-term strategy Conference participants expressed concern that steering committee membership should be diverse ba~ed on age, geography, and program background. Young people should be included An appropriate size for the group should be 15 people. The committee should be a working committee. Lansing is an appropriate central meeting location. Committee membership: • • • • Should be 15 Must be include people of various backgrounds The committee should be a working Must be include young people Groups and individuals should be encouraged to fonn local coalitions in their communities. Information from the conference should be shared with non-participants. Activities outside the Committee: • • • Formation of local coalitions Spreading of information to conference non-participants YSA will Disseminate follow-up materials to all participants LONG-TERM Although the conference participants could not anticipate the results of the federal funding process, they began formulating long-term goals for the state's youth community service initiative. The steering committee should evolve into a bipartisan, state task force with responsibility of coordinating technical support for all programs throughout the state. Assistance necessary includes state-wide training and networking conferences for youth and agencies, �a research group to develop new programs, legislation to limit volunteer liability, the creation of a mini-grant program to fund innovative projects, a coordinated public relations campaign to share success stories, and the implementation of a quality control efforts. Diversity of programs and participants should be increased whenever possible. Participation of young people in planning should continue. Long-term goals: • • • • • • • • • Formation of a bipartisan Task Force Conferences for youth and agency representatives to provide training and networking Passage of volunteer liability legislation Creation of a mini-grant program Beginning of public relations activities Creation of a newsletter for agencies Development of a quality control program for individual and state-wide programs Diversity of opportunities-a program for everyone Youth involvement in planning and implementation �THE FIRST FOLLOW-UP PLANNING MEETING July 15, 1991 at the Holiday Inn, Lansing, Michigan Hosted by the Council of Michigan Foundations On July 15, 199 1 the Council of Michigan Foundations hosted a day-long meeting in Lansing for self-selected panicipants of the June 10-11 conference and additional interested parties to continue planning for the Michigan youth service initiative. Dorothy Johnson, the President of the Council of Michigan Foundations welcomed panicipants and called the meeting to order. Ms. Johnson and members of her staff including Kathy Agard and Jim McHale were joined by representatives of the meeting's co-sponsoring organizations: Diana Algra, Executive Director of the Michigan Campus Compact; Maryellen Lewis, Executive Director of the Michigan NonProfit Forum; Roberta Stanley, Executive Assistant Superintendent for State and Federal Relations, Michigan Department of Education; and Frank Dirks, Field Organizer for Youth Service America. · The special guest for the meeting was Michelle Engler, the First Lady of Michigan. Ms. Engler was accompanied by Stephanie Comai-Page, Social Welfare Policy Advisor from the Governor's Office. Maura Wolfe, Youth Engaged in Service Coordinator for the Points of Light Foundation also attended the meeting. After Ms. Johnson's opening remarks, Ms. Engler outlined the state's response since the June Conference. • Governor Engler will appoint a commission on youth service. • Michelle Engler will chair the commission. • The commission will develop Michigan's funding application to the National and Community Service Commission. • Michigan's commission will focus on youth service. • The commission will be housed, at least initially, in the Executive Office of the Governor. • The commission should be appointed by mid-August. • Projections of size range from 15 to 21 commission members. • The commission will be representative of the diversity of the state. • The commission will have an indefinite term. It will be created by executive order and can only be ended with an executive order. • Initially, commission members will have staggered tenns- 1/3 for 1 year, 1/3 for 2 y~ and 1/3 for three years. Ultimately, membership will be three years. • Meeting participants should submit nominations for commission members to Stephanie Comai-Page. The Governors Office has already collecting names. • Young people will be represented on the commission. • Provisions are being made to staff the commission. The Governor's Office is also seeking names for the position of Executive Director for the commission. • The participants of this and the June meeting will serve as an informal advisory group for the commission. Following Ms. Engler's comments the co-sponsors offered some remarks. �Robena Stanley • The State Board of Education is interested in youth service. • The State Board is holding a conference in September on related issues. • Michigan's congressional delegation is imponant to the future of federal funding suppon for and implementation of this initiative. The delegation in Washington needs to become aware of the state's increasing interest in youth service. DianaAlgra • Service is important issue for college and university presidents in Michigan. • Program parmerships linking colleges and communities are will be valuable to promote. Maryellen Lewis • The Forum is disseminating infonnation throughout its network. Frank Dirks (Mr. Dirks served as facilitator for the rest of the meeting.) • The task of this planning meeting is to begin to formulate a series of recommendations for the state commission to consider for the state plan. The planning tirneline will be very short. • The appointment of the state commission advances Michigan to a strong position among the states developing youth service plans. • The White House is supposed to submit National Commission nominees to the Senate for confirmation before the August recess. • State applications could be due as early as early October. • YSA anticipates a carry-over ofFY '91 funds that have not been spent • The federal legislation provides the context for this discussion but should not be a limiting factor. The development of a statewide youth service plan is the right thing to do whether or not there is federal funding. • The National Commission will have 21 mem~rs serving 3 year terms. Initially. tenns will be staggered. The Secretaries of Education, Health and Human Services. Labor, and Agriculture, and the Director of AcnON will serve as ex-officio members. • This group should continue to advise the new state commission and serve as a broader pool of program technical resources. The group reviewed and discussed the funded titles in the National and Community Service Act and the status of other state development efforts. Infonnation related to this review is reflected in the appendix. �The group reviewed the basic themes drawn from the June conference. • • • • Promote collaboration. Build program capacity. Ensure program sustainability beyond suppon through the Act. Draw on the strength and experience of existing programs and organizations. • Consider new and alternative program and organizational approaches and arrangements. • Promote program and participant diversity. The group then reviewed issues of particular interest to the National Conunission that should be addressed in a state application. • The plan should be comprehensive. • The plan should promote and suppon program and organizational collaboration. • The plan should be sustainable. • Funding drawn from the Act must supplement not supplant current . state funding for programs targeted in the plan. The group recessed for lunch. The luncheon speaker was Maura Wolfe, of the Point of Light Foundation. She provided an overview of the Foundation's activities and introduced the Youth Ambassador program. The Points of Light Foundation efforts to promote and encourage volunteerism across the generations include: • National advertising campaigns. • Coordinating and mobilizing existing resources including corporate leaders to promote volunteerism. • Identifying effective programs disseminating information about them. One of the administrative divisions at the Foundation is called Youth Engaged in Service (YES). YES is about to launch a major new program to promote youth service, the YES Youth Ambassadors. The program will be piloted for one year in three states beginning in September 1991. Michigan is being considered as one of the three states. Below is a summary of the program. • 1be goals are to connect people, build coalitions, and share informacion at state, regional and national levels. • Two young people will be serve as full-time state liaison/organizers for the Foundation. • They will be assigned to work for a lead state agency/organization, such as the Governor's new commission. • They will host a minimum of two Points of Light Action Forums to inform state groups about youth service. • They will actively work to involve youth in service. • They will help to organize a data bank of services and resources. • They will be trained by Points of Light in Washington. • They need to be on the job by September. �• They should reflect diverse youth panicipation. • Points of Light is looking at Michigan as a model of state development • The state organization/agency to which the ambassadors are assigned must: -Provide them with office space, -Provide direction and guidance for works plans and activities. -Make a one-year commionent to the program. -Provide assistance in "opening doors ". The group re-convened after lunch to continue discussion of considerations imponant to a state plan. These considerations can be broken into four broad categories- the process for and structure of the youth service initiative in Michigan; youth empowerment through program and process design; education and training for program practitioners and policymakers; and best approaches for program design. A summary of issues raised and recommendations made in each of these categories follows. · PROCESS/STRUCTURE Can the state commission members represent organizations that will want to be funding recipients? How will this potential question of conflict of interest be handled? Ensure that the state process encourages local groups to build coalitions in order to pursue funding through local initiatives. The term "community service" carries connotation of alternative service for adjudicated violators of law. The language needs to be clarified. Emphasize family involvement .. many students need family members to provide transportation... youth service can be a way of involving families in volunteerism. Ensure that the efforts developed through the initiative creates a "seamless" state youth service structure. Local neighborhood service activities are preferred among young people because of transponarion concerns, time barriers, and the reward that comes from seeing the result of efforts in your own neighborhood. Programs and projects should come from the community rather than being imposed from the top. Longevity is dependent upon this ownership. Labor union involvement is imponant Youth service must not be seen as a way of supplanting jobs. Representatives of organized labor need to be a part of the process. What is the goal of the Act- youth development or community development? The federal support should be used to jump-start sustainable programs/projects. Include Michigan's many resources for long-term planning and support. Don't just rely on the federal money. �Develop incentives and rewards for local collaboration. Volunteer Action Centers can play important roles by serving as information clearinghouses, providing student mini-grant, and coordinating new project development. Funding must flow directly to local levels. Require collaboration in mini-grant requests at the local level. Consider developing a competitive grant process. Guidelines need to be shared on principles of good practice with the service organizations. Make volunteerism more accessible for "at risk" youth and families. Set up mechanisms for local communities to solve problems on their own. Ensure that people from the grass-roots can contribute to the planning process. Ensure that students, teachers, and agencies can contribute. Create a state service and conservation corps advisory committee. Creatively use and involve the 4-H and community college systems. Look at the strengths and weakness of the Minnesota model. Learn what happened with the state volunteer clearinghouse under Gov. Miliken. Develop a centralized data system with direct local access and satellite local data systems. Create incentives that emphasize the value and importance of service and volunteerism Teach volunteers to develop a volunteer portfolio of experiences. Include corporations as a strategy for long term planning. K-12/corps/service relationships. YOUTH EMPOWERMENT Use the resources of groups like those represented in this room to survey young people across the state on how grant request should be structured and use those responses in the application. Establish local community panels that include youth to assess local projects and service opportunities. Train organizations in the development and implementation of volunteer programs to make them "volunteer friendly". Need to be "youth friendly". Involve Youth at-risk �• Impvrtant to allow youth to participate in problem and solution identification. The youth perspective important. EDUCATION/TRAINING Special efforts must be made with MEA and other unions to assure that the schools are welcoming to youth volunteers, youth service curriculums and education. Be sure to recognize and answer concerns about job potenital displacement. Education and training should be a theme including opportunities for youth reflection and civic responsibility. Youth volunteer jobs should have an educational component. Make sure we have peer-tutoring/counseling links For practitioners at the state level we need: -training for management of volunteers -educators -program operators Intermediate school districts could be an excellent source for teacher training/service learning curriculum Higher education mini-grants for: Service/Learning curriculum Teacher Training May need some training re: -process for applying for funds -regional team training -volunteer program steps- "how tos" -applying for money Technical assistance/experts Mentoring/parmerships PROGRAM DESIGN The quality of experience is important -Students should not be used for meaningless work -Jobs should have learning potential -reflection/potential component should be included -evaluation must be built into process -provision of a variety of experiences -clearinghouse for volunteers -youth empowerment and involvement important Neighborhood efforts/local- "hard services" need to see the product Over arching issues: -K-12 training -remember 5-6 million dollars available �-inter-c~ganizational youth collaboration At the state level the following could be possible: -clearinghouse of collaborative projects -training of community educators and agencies -linking community projects with schools (corps/schools connected) -model job descriptions record keeping/evaluation of programs Need for intergenerational programming Incentives: -Scholarships -Work The group was left with the following tasks for the next meeting. • • • • Review the draft repon from June 10 and 11. Review minutes of July 15. Review the Act summary. Come to the next meeting prepared to answer the following questions: - What principles should guide the state commission's planning? - What should be the measurable outcomes? - What should be the organizational structu:re of the state commission? - What resources could your organization contribute to the initiative? �THE SECOND FOLLOW-UP PLANNING MEETING July 31, 1991 at the Kellogg Center, East Lansing, Michigan Hosted by the Michigan Nonprofit Forum On the afternoon of July 31, 1991, Maryellen Lewis of the Michigan Nonprofit Forum hosted a second planning meeting at the Kellogg Center on the campus of Michigan State University. Ms. Lewis was joined by representatives of the meeting's co-sponsoring organizations: Kathy Agard, Program Director for the Council of Michigan Foundations; Diana Algra, Executive Director of the Michigan Campus Compact; Robena Stanley, Executive Assistant Superintendent for State and Federal Relations, Michigan Depamnent of Education; and Frank Dirks, Field Organizer for Youth Service America. Stephanie Comai-Page, representing the Governor's Office was also in attendance. Participants had been asked in a memo sent to them prior to the meeting to record their responses to the questions posed at the end of the July, 15 meeting. The following in a summary of the questions and the written answers that were submitted. What are principles you believe should guide the Governor's Commission to create a youth service plan for Michigan? • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Build upon success while encouraging innovation. Consider the benefits for participants and the state. Quality is more important than quantity. Include all sectors in planning and programming. Involve young people in planning. Ensure that youth are members of the commission. Encourageinnovation. Consider a variety of programs from a variety of areas. Ensure geographic representation. Link to existing business and education partnerships. Give special attention to urban areas. Ensure local community suppon and ownership. Promote outcome driven efforts. Maintain realistic expectations of financial and human requirements and availability. Address real community needs. Institutionalize new programs and expand established programs. Ensure that youth service experiences are meaningful for youth. Give priority to actual projects over clearinghouse models. Collaboration must be defined as involving community residents, not just community agencies. Maintain consistent and broadly disseminated standards for program practice. Involve youth in community partnerships. What are measurable outcomes that should be specified for a successful local collaboration for youth community service under the Michigan youth service plan? • • • • • Project progress. Impact on participants. Value of work accomplished. Number of persons effectively served. Program efficiency. �• • • • • • • Long term effect. Diversity of participants and agencies, and services provided. Leadership roles taken by youth. Extent of business partnerships. Retention of youth in programs. Sustainability of programs. Level of youth involvement in program planning and decisionmaking • The scructure, intent, and practice of youth advisory councils. • The level and quality of local community agency support. What should be the commission's development plan and the process for fund distribution? • Grant applications should demonstrate- the buy-in of local partners, youth involvement in planning process, and should include expected outcomes, an operating plan, and a monitoring system. The grant review process should be inclusive and measure against the items above. • Use funding to support the formation of a program development infrastructure. Match existing resources. Local programs should be responsible for sustainability. • Support regional clearinghouses that promote the development of local coalitions and provide technical assistance and support that: - trains youth for service opportunities. - trains agencies to provide quality service experiences. - trains coalitions to raise funds to become self-supporting. • Utilize existing networks. Do not create a new bureaucracy. • The Governor's Commission should determine the criteria for grant proposals and selection. The Governor Romney, Janet Blanchard, Michelle Engler co-chaired Coordinating Committee on Voluntarism should have an equal role in selecting local grantees. Local grantees should demonstrate the implementation of a local inter-agency committee on youth initiatives and the role of young people in the design and implementation of~ local program. What are resowces your organization or network will contribute towards the success of the Michigan youth service plan? Staff Expertise in: Program development Statewide program implementation and operation Administration Sub-granting Experience with past and present highly successful programs Information dissemination Access to student volunteers Limited Staff Support Expertise on and access to resource materials �Information on colb.~ration models Video tape and handbook/guide may be reproduced and distributed Programmatic statistics and information may be shared Grantsmanship expenise Technical assistance to communities wishing to develop youth action councils Identification of local individuals and organizations The above questions served to frame the group discussion. Frank Dirks, of Youth Service America served as facilitator. Listed below is a summary of the points raised during the discussion. GUIDING PRINCIPLES Use existing systems, build on strength while encouraging innovation. Involve youth at all levels. Respond flexibility to local circumstances. Involve local coalitions. Applications should be judged on a point system where points are earned for each type of collaboration Youth Educators Business and private industry councils Seniors Handicapped Churches Collaboration requires community residents not just community agencies. Expand from existing programs. Outcomes should be based on community needs assessment Broadly target "at risk" youth by giving additional points to those proposals. Involve those served in the planning and evaluation process. Make the process easy to understand and accessible. Make it easy for youth inpul Ensure that suppon is not exclusively directed toward strong and well established programs. Mixture merit and potential. Suppon sustainable programs. Maintain a long-range plan. Emphasize quality over quantity. �OUTCOMES There is very little research on the effect of service on youth development. Building a research base for youth service should be integrated into the plan. Research will help advance the initiative and guide new program development. Head Start research has influenced policy development. A sampling of suggested measures: Continued volunteer service. Service impact on the community. Attitude changes among youth servers and community members. Leadership roles taken by youth servers. Level of community agency involvement Measures must look at the effect on servers and the community served. Use research to educate funding sources and win their support Consider a "human service unit" served. formul~ for instance, how many older Americans are Consider measures for the type of service provided. Enlist an independent evaluator to assess state-wide initiative. Establish an easy, yet uniform, reporting mechanism in order to build a comprehensive database. Link this to the independent evaluator. Include service benefits for youth: employability, group process skills, education goals. Link to national education goals. Research should not drive projects. Overall outcomes: community awareness, willingness to continue project, increased local funds for youth service programs. · RESOURCES TO BE SHARED Council of Michigan Foundations - Community and funding resource information and training. Department of Education - Information on successful school-based programs • Michigan Campus Compact - Information on successful college programs, experience in making service mini-grants. Detroit Compact - Training. �4H staff- Community program collabon1tors, extensive network resources, technical assistance, and training. Bloomfield Hills School District- Program development experience in school-based programs. Catholic Youth Organization in Detroit - Information on "Youth on Board" program and information on leadership development. Volunteer Center Network- Assistance in volunteer management, convening local networks. Neighborhood Builders Alliance - Assistance in program organization, local grant-making procedures, and project evaluation. Michigan State University Service Learning Center- Materials on program operation, and evaluation support and guidance. United Community Services- Training, volunteer management database, and training for community assessment and planning. Nonprofit Forum - Promotion in connection with the Michigan Association of Broadcasters, linkage to Year of Volunteers in 1992, and will dedicate newsletter to youth · service in Michigan. Michigan United Way- Training and local fundraising support. Campus Outreach Opportunity League- Support in organizing college student coalitions to promote service. Michigan Association of Secondary School Principals - Information dissemination, and support in recruiting speakers and advocates. Children's Charter- Information on youth involvement on boards. Urban League Network- Infonnation, referral, facilities, recruitment, and advocacy. ELEMENTS FOR A STATE PLAN Use the grant-making research and experience of Department of Education mini-grant programs. Use the experience of the Michigan Campus Compact venture grant program and explore linkages. Make application process easy so a group of students could apply (through a fiscal agent). Establish different categories for grants. Some grants should be large enough to provide significant support. Do not allow a term like "mini-grants" to define the program. Some grants should not be mini. Support noc only sustainable programs but also specific projects that may have a limited duration. �Consider funding networks to support program development Look at how local projects fits into larger strategic plan-- they relate to the long-term goals of the initiative. Involve youth in aJI elements of the initiative. PARTICIPANTS July 31. 1991 Donna Clarke Michelle Strasz C.J. Howell Paulette Ethier Les Schrich Darryl White Neil Davis Dana Cole Mary Cady Kate Stuttnaner Beth Gibbs Jim Vollman Jim McHale Ross Dodge Michigan Non-profit Forum Children's Charter Youth Advisory Council United Community Services 4H Youth Program Volunteer Centers of MI Battle Creek Area Urban League Governor's Office MI Association of Volunteer Administrators Catholic Youth Organization (Detroit) Bloomfield Hills Public Schools Detroit Compact Council of MI Foundations MI Dept of Natural Resources/MI Civilian Conservation Corps MI Campus Compact Urban League of Aint ACTION Aint Youth Service Corps/Urban LEague United Way, Grand Rapids . Grand Rapids Public Schools Ml ASIOCition of Seconct.y School Principals Ml Auociation of Na.Publ.ic Schools Uniaed W"'J of Ml Greaw Kalamazoo United Way MSU Service Learning Center MSUACilON MI Dept of Education . MI Labor Dept Neighborhood Builders Alliance Muskegon County DET Council of MI Foundations Governor's Office DianaAlgra Harold W. Jones Stanley Stewart Jacquline Tortr Alida Zeilstra Fritz Crabb Jack Bittle Billie Kops Wi11'11Jla' Gene Keilitz Brenda Hint Mary Edens Darin Day Robena Stanley Deborah Grether Rick Balllld Glen Jenkins Kathy Alpnt Stephanie Cornai-Page � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1991_CM_1991-10-31_MI-Youth-Service-Commission-Draft-Recommendations Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting Michigan Youth Service Commission draft recommendations Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting Michigan Youth Service Commission draft recommendations. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49408 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1991-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/506e64f81cd48edf6e29a7d65b9ccdf2.pdf 7e789bb3511f9787eb65dfccd8b66d32 PDF Text Text Michigan Community Service Commission Thursday, October 31, 1991 Olds Plaza, 2nd Floor Lansing, Michigan 10:00 a.m. - 2:00 p.m. MINUTES MEMBERS PRESENT: Michelle Engler, Chair Dr. Mary Ellen Brandell DarinA Day Dr. John DiBiaggio Hemy C. Gaines Paul Hubbard Dorothy Johnson Terry Langston Lisa Ilitch Murray Vernie Nethercut Dr. Joel Orosz Eugene Proctor Terry Pruitt, Jr. Judith Reyes Judith Riedlinger Geneva Jones Williams Diana R Algra MEMBERS ABSENT: James Kalil Dr. William S. Stavropoulos OTIIERS: Jocelyn Vanda, Dept. of Social Services Stacie Smith, Executive Assistant to the First Lady Trabian Shorters, YES Ambassador Cynthia Scherer, YES Ambassador Paulette Ethier, Senior Mgr. Public Relations , U.C.S. Judith Keely, Dept. of Labor Stephanie Comai-Paige, Governor's Office 1. Openin~ Address Governor John Engler made a brief welcoming address to the Commission members. He expressed his strong support of this initiative and wished the Commission well in its upcoming work. He stressed that coordination of services on a statewide basis was very-important to him and that he would look to the Commission for suggestions on how this could be accomplished. �2. Call to Order The meeting was called to order by Chairperson Michelle Engler. Mrs. Engler provided the members with a brief history of how we came to establish a commission on community Service. The initial thrust came from the signing of the National Community Service Legislation by the President. Once that took place, Youth Service America (YSA) approached a number of key organizations in Michigan to suggest the formation of a statewide coalitions to prepare the ground work for the development of a statewide plan. Thereafter, three meetings were held in the summer of 1991 where representatives of K-12, Higher Education, Community Based Organizations and Youth Corps and youth came together to begin dialogue of youth service programs across Michigan. By the time of the second meeting in July 199 1, the Governor was committed to the formation of a statewide commission on Community Service. This commission would be designated the lead agency in coordinating the effort to develop a statewide youth service policy. The summer meetings also produced preliminary recommendations for the Commission to consider in developing a statewide youth service plan. These can be found in your notebook. Mr. Frank Dirks of Youth Service America will be joining us at our November 22, 1991 meeting to review this with us in more depth. 3. Introduction of Commissioners The Chairperson, Mrs. Engler requested that each member of the Commission do a self-introduction. Each member introduced him or herself and shared some personal background on themselves and their interest in the field of service. 4. Briefin~ on the National Le~islation The Chairperson also informed the Commission that four major departments will serve as government liaisons to the Commission. These are Department of Education (DOE), Department of Labor (DOL), Department of Social Services (DSS), and the Department of Management & Budget, Office of the Services to the Aging (DMB I OSA). 2 �Each representative of these departments will attend the Commission meetings, and serve as resources to the Commission as the need arises. Diana Algra then provided the Commission with a general overview of the National Legislation. Noting that until regulations are finally out, some changes could still occur. The National and Community Service Act of 1990 is divided into the following titles: TITLE I THE NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE STATE GRANT PROGRAM • SubtitleA States apply to the Commission on National and Community Service to fund one or some combination of the following program options in one consolidated application. Local applicants must seek funding from the state. If a state does not apply, local applicants may apply directly to the Commission for funding. • Subtitle B: School-Aged Service (a) Part I- School and Communities -Based Programs for Students and Out of School YouthPrograms and activities that might be funded under this section are: 1. State planning and capacity building. 2. School based service learning. 3. Community service programs targeted to out-ofschool youth. 4. School-based adult volunteer and partnership programs. Funding Level- 1992 is at $16.8 million. (b) Part II - Higher Education Innovative Projects for Community Service. Programs and activities that might be funded under this section are: 3 �1. Community service projects designed by college students. 2. Service integrated into the college curriculum. 3. Training for teachers and other community leaders on how to design and implement service program. Funding Level- 1992 is at $5.6 million. • Subtitle C: Full-time and Summer Youth Service and Conservation Corps. Such programs offer full-time productive work with visible community benefits in a natural resource or human service setting and give participants a mix of work experience, basic and life skills, education, training and support service. Funding Level - 1991 is at $22.5 million. • Subtitle D: National and Community Service Full/Part-time Programs. These are to be civilian service programs that can address unmet educational, human service, environmental service, or public safety needs in a community. Funding Level- 1992 is at $22.5 million. • Subtitle E: Innovative and Demonstration Programs and Projects. Part I - Limitation on Grants: the Commission shall make grants for not fewer than three programs authorized in this subtitle. Programs under this section can cover the following: Part II - Governor Innovative Service Program: E.g. conduct research, provide technical assistance training and staff development to expand service programs. 4 �Part III - Peace Corps/VISTA Demonstration Program Commission can and may provide grants to PEACE CORPS or ACTION to fund 2 years of undergraduate study for 50 college students. They must, however, serve 3 years as a PEACE CORPS or VISTA volunteer. Part IV- Other Volunteer Programs: 1. Rural Youth Service Demonstration Project. 2. Foster Grandparents in Head Start programs. 3. Employer-based retiree volunteer programs. Funding Level - 1992 has not been determined at the present time. At our next meeting we also hope to have a representative of the Govemor's Washington office attend our meeting and assist us in a more in-depth review of the legislation. 5. Update on the National Commission and Federal Grant Time Line. The Chairperson outlined for the Commission the following tentative time lines regarding the funding. • Mid-November 1991 -Preliminary regulations out with a 30-45 day comment period. • January 1, 1992 -Final guidelines for states to begin their process. • Mid-January 1992 -State must declare its intent to seek funds. • Mid-March 1992 -Deadline for state application to National Commission. • May 1, 1992- Awards announced. Again, these are tentative. The Chairperson did encourage all the members of the Commission to take the opportunity to comment on the regulations once they were available. 5 �Commissioner Williams requested that copies of the regulations be made available to all the members and also encouraged some guidance from staff with regard to issues that could be addressed or raised, in order that the Commission would comment with a united voice. Commissioner Orosz was in agreement with the above request. Trabian Shorters suggested that the review of concerns with specific guidelines would be an agenda item for the next Commission meeting. 6. Review of Commissioner Briefing Notebooks The Executive Director walked the Commissioners through the various sections of their briefmg notebooks. 7. Discussion of Goals and ObJectives of the Commission. Chairperson Engler emphasized that we would not deal in-depth with development of goals at this meeting. However, by the next meeting the staff would draft proposed goals and objectives for the Commission to look at and use as a basis for the development of our goals and objectives. Commissioner Orosz addressed the concern of how to convey the message that the Commission is not interested in replacing or taking over those programs already in existence and doing excellent work. Diana Algra responded by saying that all of the participants in our summer meeting would be informed of the creation of the Commission and its members, and that the Commission would help to strengthen the work already being done by many of the participants. Chairperson Engler discussed meeting dates, times of the meeting and the issue of having alternate representatives and proxies. After much discussion, it was decided that the Commission staff will prepare draft operating procedures for the Commission which will outline issues of quorum, meeting dates and absentees. A motion was made that the Commission wait until the next meeting to approve procedures. All Commissioners approved the meeting dates except for the April, 1992 date. All Commission meetings will be held in the mornings beginning in January 1992. The motion was seconded by Paul Hubbard and passed unanimously. 6 �The chairperson mentioned that the Commission would appreciate having Commission members offer to host Commission meetings at a location other than the Olds Plaza building in Lansing. At that point, Usa Ilitch Murray offered to host a meeting at the Fox Theater, Dr. Orosz at the Kellogg Foundation and Dr. DiBiaggio at either MSU Kellogg Center or the Troy Management Center. Discussion then turned to proposed working subcommittees for the Commission. Chairperson Engler suggested the following ones for consideration: 1. 2. 3. 4. Community Partnership Corporate Involvement Philanthropic Involvement Outreach Network The Commission members felt it might be premature to establish any subcommittees at the current time. Commissioner DiBiaggio suggested that we wait until our state plan is developed and then consider what needs we have before we develop subcommittees. All present agreed. 8. Introduction of Youth Engaged in Service Ambassadors. Cynthia Scherer and Trabian Shorters. The Ambassadors introduced themselves and outlined their goals and objectives. Trabian then introduced Mr. Chuck Supple from the Points of Light Foundation. Mr. Supple talked about the Youth Engaged in Services Program and the YES Ambassadors in Michigan. Mr. Supple outlined that the Points of Light Foundation's mission is to help make direct and consequential community service aimed at serious social problems central to the life of every American and to increase the opportunities people have for that kind of service through their workplaces, schools, houses of worship and civic organizations. The foundation also serves as a catalyst in the creation of new voluntary service initiatives. He also stated that the Ambassador Program is a pilot program and that the youth ambassadors are a resource to their host organization (Michigan Community Service Commission) and should be called upon to assist the Commission in its initiatives. 7 �9. Next Meetln~ The Chairperson adjourned the meeting at 2:00p.m. It was announced that the next meeting would be held November 22, 1991 from 1:00- 4:00p.m in the Olds Plaza Building in the Governor's Cabinet Room. An agenda and other meeting details will follow. A motion was made, seconded and approved to adjourn the meeting at 2:00 p.m. 8 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1991_CM_1991-10-31_Minutes Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting minutes Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting minutes. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49407 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1991-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/7fcb453521286e138d1c92c0e970c0ae.pdf fefadf85079576cd9773795e66056605 PDF Text Text 1. October 31, 1991 - held (Lansing) 2. November 22, 1991- held (Lansing) 3. January 31, 1992- held (UCS of Metro Detroit) 4. February 28, 1992 - held (MSU) 5. March 27, 1992- held (New Detroit) 6. May 22, 1992- held (CMU) 7. June 26, 1992- cancelled 8. July 24, 1992- held (Tippy Dam Camp) 9. August 28 , 1992- cancelled 10. September 25, 1992- held (Battle Creek) 11. October 23, 1992 -held (Lansing) 12. November 1992 -Retreat in Albion 13. January 22, 1993- held (Midland) 14. April 23, 1993- held (Lansing) 15. July 23, 1993- held (Madonna University) 16. October 22, 1993 changed to October 29, 1993 - held (Alpena) 17. January 27, 1994 changed to March 23, 1994- held (Lansing) 18. May 20, 1994- held (Flint) 19. September 23, 1994- held (Grand Rapids) 20. December 2, 1994- held (Detroit) 21. February 24, 1995 22. May 19, 1995 23. August 25, 1995 24. December 1, 1995 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1991_CM_1991-10-31_Meeting-Schedule Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting meeting schedule Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting meeting schedule. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49406 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1991-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/5cc31f1f7e052e73862cc37187c63083.pdf 2bad1affd81e1d4700c13f70269e8a04 PDF Text Text t' -' . STATE OF /v/ICHIGA LV JOHN ENGLER GOVERNOR EXECUTIVE ORDER No. 1991·25 MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION WHEREAS, this administration is committed to encourag in g a ll citizens, organizations and institutions in Michigan to help in solving our most critical problems by volunteering their time, effort, energy and service; and WHEREAS, the increasing demands for services and limited financial resou rcas of the State have contributed to the need to call upon the energy, compassion, inventiveness and the entrepreneurial spirit of all citizens to help solve many of the problems facing their communities; and WHEREAS, it is the desire of this administration to discover and to encourag e new community service leaders, to promote individuals, organizations and institution s that serve as outstanding examples of a commitment to serving others, and to convince all Michigan citizens that a successful life includes serving others; and WHEREAS, significant issues facing the State can be addressed by the collaborative efforts of committed citizens volunteering their time and talents, volunteer centers, community organizations, business and labor groups and a host of other community and State agencies; and WHEREAS, the establishment of a commission would promote voluntee ris m through a ~h~lping hands effort" in which the Governor and the First Lady of Michigan lend their personal support to volunteer organizations and local communities that identify cultural, educational and social programs in need of assistance or funding, as committed by the Governor in his State of the State message; and WHEREAS, Public Law 101-610, the National and Community Service Act of 1990, was enacted to promote an ethic of civic responsibility to enable all Americans, and particularly young Americans, to make a substantiaJ commitment to service resulting in an unprecedented level of citizen participation; and WHEREAS, it is the intent of the federal National and Community Service Act to build upon the existing organizationaJ framework of federal, state and local agenci es by Increasing cooperation and expanding full-time and part·time service opportunities for aJI citizens; and WHEREAS, the Act establishes a system of federal grant programs for: (1) Students and Out-of-School Youth to Serve America; (2) Higher Education Innovative Projects for Community Service; (3) An American Conservation and Youth Corps; (4) NationaJ and Community Service; and (5) Innovative and Demonstration Programs and Projects; and WHEREAS, the goals of this administration and of the National Act are facilitated by creation of an organization within the State of Michigan designed to promote these objectives and to secure available federal funds for the purposes indicated. �NOW, THEREFORE, I, John Engler, Governor of the State of Michigan, pursuant to the powers vested in me by the Constitution of the State of Michigan of 1963 and th laws of the State of Michigan, do herc;~by order the establishment of the Michigan Community Service Commission within the Department of Labor. The Commission is charged with the following responsibilities: (1) Develop a coordinated, unified state plan in response to the National and Community Service Act of 1990; (2) Establish policies and procedures for the use of federal funds; (3) Develop initiatives to promote community service in coordination with existing programs. The Commission shall be composed of 21 members who shall be appointed by the Governor, who shall designate the Chairperson of the Commission. The term of appointment shall be 3 years, except that of those initially appointed, 7 members shall be appointed to terms expiring on October 1, 1992; 7 members to terms expiring on October 1, 1993; and 7 members to terms expiring on October 1, 1994. The Commission shall function indefinitely and shall provide the Governor with an annual report which describes its activities during the preceding year. Annual reports shall be submitted not later than 60 days after the close of each fiscal year. The Commission shall have an executive director and such additional staff as may be required to carry out its mandate. The executive director of the Commission shall report directly to the Governor and to the Commission for the purpose of giving advice and making recommendations on programs and laws related to volunteerism and community service. All state departments and agencies shall cooperate with the Commission in the performance of its responsibilities. The Commission may request, and state agencies and departments shall provide, such policy and technical information as is required by the Commission in the discharge of its responsibilities. ":. ~ . .. ·_ / ·, ' ' ; ,, ....... . - t . '. BY THE GOVERNOR: ~~~ SECRETARY OF STATE Given under my hand and the Great Seal of the State of Michigan this 2---1 day of October, in the Year of our Lord, One Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety-One, and of the Commonwealth, One Hundred Fifty-Five. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1991_CM_1991-10-31_Executive-Order Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting Executive Order Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting Executive Order. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49405 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1991-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/9a59157f5e7de97ddc50b844b12b11af.pdf a101fcd6e7ca454d995ecf334caf7a54 PDF Text Text MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY (DRAFT) The Michigan Community Service Commission, in recognition of potential conflict of interest situations, adopts the following policy to guide its work: 1. Members of the Commission are asked to declare actual or potential conflict of interest situations at the start of each meeting where the agenda indicates such a conflict will occur. If a conflict of interest situation develops during Commission discussion, the commissioner with the conflict is expected to notify the Chairperson. Conflicts of interest include situations where a member of the Commission serves as a Trustee, Board member, staff member, or committee member of an entity which is requesting approval of a grant from the Michigan Community Service Commission. Or any other relationship which the Commissioner, in his/her own discretion deems a conflict of interest. 2. Any members of the Commission with a conflict will be called on by the Chairperson to discuss details and share any information about the proposed grant at the time of the individual grant request discussion. The Commission member will then be excused by the Chairperson while other members of the Commission discuss the application and vote its acceptance or denial. Following action on the grant request, the Commissioner may return to the Commission work. 3. Michigan Community Service Commission members who are unsure about a conflict of interest situation should discuss their concerns with the Chairperson prior to the meeting where the conflict might occur. In general, the Michigan Community Service Commission wants to err on the side of too stringently enforcing conflict of interest policies in order to assure that both the fact and the perception of any unethical conduct is avoided. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1991_CM_1991-10-31_Conflict-of-Interest-Policy Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting Conflict of Interest Policy Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting Conflict of Interest Policy. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49404 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1991-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/20cd820f4baf409b3531068242782055.pdf 4c05da382e9ca2d44f1b5ffbee7eae53 PDF Text Text Commission on National and Community Senice P.O Box 33119 WashingtL .1, D.C. 20033-0119 Mrs. Joyce M. Black Executive Director Governor's Office for Voluntary Service Two World Trade Center 57th Floor New Yor~ NY 10047 (212) 417-2255 Fax: (212) 417-4709 Mrs. Frances Hesselbein President and CEO Peter F. Drucker Foundation for Nonprofit Management 656 Fifth Avenue lOth Floor New York, NY 10103 (212) 399-1710 Fax: (212) 399-4426 Reverend William James Byron. SJ. President The Catholic University of America Washington, DC 20064 (202) 319-5100 Fax: (202) 319-4441 Mr. Alan Khazei Commission Vice Chair Co-Founder City Year 11 Stillings Street Boston, MA 02210 (617) 451-0699 Fax: (617) 695-0562 Mr. Thomas Ehrlich President Indiana University Bryan Ball 200 Bloomington, IN 47405 (612) 855-4613 Fax: (812) The Honorable Daniel J. Evans 1111 Third Avenue Suite 3400 Seattle, WA 38101 (206) 447-4700 Fax: (206) 447-4701 Ms. Maria Hernandez Farrier Executive Director for Special Programs Southwest Independent School District 11914 Dragon Lane San Antonio, TX 78252-2647 (512) 622-9908 Fax: (512) 622-5428 Dr. Reatha Clark King Commission Vice Chair President and Executive Director General Mills Foundation Post Office Box 1113 Minneapolis, MN 55440 (612) 540-7890 Fax: (612) 540-4925 Dr. Leslie Lankowsky President and Chief Executive Officer Hudson Institute Herman Kahn Center Post Office Box 26-919 Indianapolis, IN 46226 (317) 545-1000 Fax: (317) 545-9639 �Mr. Jack A MacAllister Chairman of the Board U.S. West, Inc. 9785 Maroon Circle Suite 332 Englewood, CO 80112 (303) 649-4346 Fax: (303) 649-4526 The Honorable Paul N. McCloskey Commission Chair 3000 Sand Hill Road Building One, Suite 170 Menlo Park. CA 94025 (415) 854-7770 Fax: (415) 854- ; ;87 Mr. Wayne W. Meisel Executive Director The Corelia and Bertram Bonner Foundation 22 Chambers Street Post Office Box 712 Princeton, NJ 08542 (609) 924-6663 Fax: (609) 683-4626 Mr. Richard Frederick Phelps 122 Peashway South Bend, IN 46617 (219) 232-6486 Fax: (219) 239-8231 The Honorable George Romney 1840 East Valley Road Bloomfield Hills, MI 48013 (313) 642-5011 Fax: (313) 642-4418 Mrs. Patricia Rouse Co-Founder The Enterprise Foundation 500 American City Building Columbia, Maryland 21044 (301) 964-1230 Fax: (301) 964-1918 Ms. Shirley Sagawa Commission Vice Chair Senior Counsel National Women's Law Center 1616 P Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 328-5160 Fax: (202) 328-5137 The Reverend Johnnie Smith 2510 Wave Hampton Blvd. Suite 8 Greenville, SC 29165 (803) 292-5600 Fax: (803) 268-3009 Dr. Glen W. White Director of Training Research and Training Center on Independent Living 4089 Dole Building University of Kansas Lawrence, KS 66045 (913) 864-0590 Fax: (913) 864-5323 Mrs. Gayle Wilson Office of the Governor State of California Sacramento, CA 95814 (916) 445-2841 Fax: (916) 445-4633 �,.. -··---- - - -- t Mr. Robert L Woodson President National Center for Neighborhood EnteQrise 1367 Connecticut Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202) 331-1103 Fax: (202) 296-1541 Ms. Karen Young National Meetings Director Campus Outreach Opportunity League 356 McNeal Hall 1985 Buford Avenue St. Paul, MN 55108 (612) 624-3018 Fax: (612) 625-5767 . Catherine Milton Commission Interim Director cjo ACfiON 1'100 Vermont Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20525 (202) 606-4880 Fax: (202) 606-4928 - - -- � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1991_CM_1991-10-31_CNCS-Roster Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting National Community Service roster Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting National Community Service roster. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49403 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1991-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/01fa903a0a68cf0ee5322ace72a68c20.pdf d83826658ff8e4a59f1024028d686c55 PDF Text Text THE WHITE HOUSE OFFICE OF NATIONAL SERVICE BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON NOMINEES TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE COMMISSION ON NATIONAL AND COMMUNITY SERVICE The President announced the nominees to the Board of Directors of the Commission on National and Community Service on July 22, 1991. The Commission's mandate is to design and administer new programs under the National and Community Service Act of 1990, to evaluate apd assess the programs within its jurisdiction, and to advise the President and Congress about developments in community service. JOYCE M. BLACK, of New York, New York. Ms. Black ' is the Executive Director of the Governor's Office for Voluntary Service in New York. The first woman President of Big Brothers/Big Sisters of America, Ms. Black has served on the boards of numerous voluntary health and welfare organizations. Ms. Black is the President of the National Assembly of Health and Welfare Organizations and of the Council of Children and Families in New York State. Past President of the Hospital Trustees of New York State, she holds a B.S. Degree from Skidmore College. WILLIAM J. BYRON, of Washington, D.C. Father Byron is the President of The Catholic University of America. He has held numerous directorships, trusteeships, professorships and is widely published in many fields. He is Director of The Sister . Thea Bowman Black Catholic Education Foundation, Director of the National Association of Independent Colleges and Universities, and former Chairman of the Division III Subcommittee of the National Collegiate Athletic Association President's Commission. Father Byron was President of the University of Scranton from 1975-1982, and serves on the boards of many education, health and civil organizations. He received a Ph.D. in Economics from the University of Maryland. THOMAS EHRLICH. of Bloomington, Indiana. Mr. Ehrlich is the President of Indiana University. He currently is Vice President of and serves on the Executive Committee of Campus Compact - The Project for Public and Community Service. He has served as President of the Legal Services Corporation, a non-profit organization supporting legal assistance for poor people. Former Dean of stanford Law School, Mr. Ehrlich graduated magna cum laude from both Harvard University and Harvard Law School. �QANIEL J. EVANS, of Seattle, Wash~ngton. Governor Evans is the President of Daniel J. Evans Associates in Seattle. A former Governor and Senator from Washington State, he has gained nationa 1 recognition as a statesm'an. After a distinguished military career and 13 years as a professional engineer, Governor Evans was elected in 1956 to the Washington state House of Representatives. As Governor, he served three consecutive terms, passing up a potential fourth term for the Presidency of The Evergreen State College. He was elected to the Senate by special election in 1983, and served until 1988. Governor Evans received both his B.A. and Master of Science degrees in Civil Engineering from the University of Washington. HARIA HERNANDEZ FERRIER. of San Antonio, Texas. Ms. Ferrier is the Executive Director for Community Services in the Southwest Independent School District. She is responsible for initiating several programs including the first S.A.D.D. Chapter for elementary students in the u.s.; "Safety Kids", a school abduction prevention program; the award winning and model Nimitz Community Education program for at-risk students, and is cofounder of the SWISD/Kelly AFB mentoring partnership which was recognized as one of the President's "1000 Points of Light." Among other awards, she has received the National Community Education's Minority Leadership Award and the United Way's Volunteer of the Year Award in Education. She holds a B.A. in sp~ech and a M.Ed. in Guidance and Counseling from Our Lady of the Lake University in San Antonio, as is presently completing her doctorate at Texas A & M University. FRANCES HESSELBEIN, of Easton, Pennsylvania. Mrs. Hesselbein is President and CEO of the Peter F. Drucker Foundation for Nonprofit Management and Chairman of the Board of Governors of the Josephson Institute for The Advancement of Ethics. She serves on the Board of the Mutual of America Life Insurance Company. She was Chief Executive Officer of the Girl Scouts of the U.S.A. from July 1976 to February 1990. Mrs. Hesselbein also served on the Presidential Advisory Committee on the Points of Light Initiative Foundation, and has received five Honorary Degrees. She attended the University of Pittsburgh. ALAN KBAZBI. of Boston, Massachusetts. Mr. Khazei is Co-Founder and co-Director of City Year, a model national service program that unites young adults from diverse backgrounds for a year of full-time community service. Since its launch, City Year has provided more than 100 community agencies with over 160,000 hours of community service. He serves on the Board of Directors of Share our Strength · (s.o.s.), a national hunger relief organization, and on the board of the Massachusetts Youth Service Alliance. Mr. Khazei graduated magna cum laude from Harvard College in 1983 with a B.A. in Government, and received a J.D., cum laude, in 1987 from Harvard Law School. �REATHA CLARK KING, of St. Paul, Minnesota. Dr. King is the President and Executive Director of the General Mills Foundation. She was involved in the early formation of Campus Compact, a national organization which promotes service-learning by college students. A former St. Paul United Way President and current Minneapolis United Way leader, Dr. King also served 11 years as President of Metropolitan State University. She holds a B.S. · degree in Chemistry and Mathematics from Clark College, a Masters and Doctorate in Chemistry from the University of Chicago, and an MBA from Columbia University. LESLIE LENKOWSKY, of Indianapolis, Indiana. Dr. Lenkowsky is President and CEO of the Hudson Institute in Indianapolis. He previously served as President of the Institute for Educational Affairs in Washington, D.C., Director of Research at the Smith Richardso~ Foundation, and has authored numerous publications. In 1985 Dr. Lenkowsky was a resident fellow of the American Enterprise Institute, and a consultant to Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan. He graduated from Franklin and Marshall College and holds a Ph.D. from Harvard University. · JACK A. MacALLISTER, of Englewood, Colorado. Mr. MacAllister is the Chairman of the Board and former CEO of U.S. WEST, Inc. He is the former President of Northwestern Bell. In the early 1980s, he was named National Minority Advocate of the Year by the Small Business Association. Mr. MacAllister is a member of the bciard of trustees at the University of Northern Colorado, as well as the boards of the National Park Foundation and The st. Paul Companies. He graduated from the University of Iowa in 1950. PAUL N. McCLOSKEY. JB., of Menlo Park, California. Congressman McCloskey is a Partner in the Law Offices of Paul N. McCloskey, Jr. A former Congressman from the 12th Congressional District in California, he served as Deputy District Attorney, Alameda County, California, before practicing law in Palo Alto from 1955 through 1967. Congressman McCloskey's community involvement includes service as President of the Palo Alto Fair Play Council and on the Board of Family Services Association. He also founded the s~anford Area Youth Plan, a college/high school counseling program which has spread across the nation. Congressman McCloskey has a distinguished record of military service in the United States Marine Corps, and graduated from Stanford University in 1950 and Stanford Law School in 1953. WAYNE w. MEISEL. of Minneapolis, Minnesota. Mr. Meisel is Executive Director of the Corella and Bertram F. Bonner Foundation. Prior to his work at the Bonner Foundation, Mr. Meisel founded Campus Outreach Opportunity League (COOL), a nonprofit organization designed to build and champion a national youth movement based on community service. Mr. Meisel designed and directed HAND (House and Neighborhood Development), which facilitated and institutionalized student and campus activities in the cambridge community. He attended the Lawrenceville school, and is a graduate cum laude of Harvard University. �RICHARD FREDERICK PHELPS. of South Bend, Indiana. Mr. Phelps was the Head Basketball Coach at the University of Notre Dame from 1971 to 1990. Named Coach of the Year in 1971, 1974, and 1987, Mr. Phelps has the most wins of ariy ba~ketball coach in Notre Dame history. An active volunteer with the Special Olympics program, he helped pick the 1984 Olympic team and has worked on the legislative committee of the National Association of College Basketball Coaches. Mr. Phelps currently serves on the Citizen's Stamp Advisory Committee of the Unites States Postal Service. He received his B.S. in Commerce and his M.A. in Business Education at Rider College. GEORGE WILCKEN ROMNEY. of Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. Governor Romney is the founding chairman of The National VOLUNTEER Center. His business career includes serving as Chairman and CEO of American Motors. Elected to three terms as Governor of Michigan, George Romney was a Presidential candidate in 1968 and the Secretary of Housing and Urban Development under President Nixon. Throughout his life, Governor Romney has been an active civic leader and volunteer, from helping to organize the first federated fund-raising campaign in the nation in 1948 to membership on the President's Advisory Board on Private Sector Initiatives in 1986. He is a current and founding member of the Board of Directors of the Points of Light Foundation. PATRICIA TRAUGOTT ROUSE, of Columbia, Maryland. Mrs. Rouse is the co-founder of The Enterprise Foundation and serves as Secretary/Treasurer and member of the Board of Trustees. The Enterprise Foundation was created to provide decent, affordable housing for the poor. She is a member of the Board of Directors of the Health and Welfare Council, Inc. of Maryland, as well as of the Boards of the Jubilee Enterprise of Greater Washington, Inc. and the National Low Income Housinq Coalition. Ms. Rouse . graduated magna cum laude from sweet Briar College, and pursued graduate work in Urban Studies at Old Dominion University. SHIRLEY SACHI SAGAWA. of Alexandria, Virginia. Ms. Sagawa is Senior counsel and Director of Family and Youth Policy for the National Women's Law Center. As Chief Counsel !or Youth Policy to the Senate Labor and Resources Committee from 1987 to 1991, Ms. Sagawa was responsible for national and volunteer service, education, Head Start and children's issues. A volunteer at the carpenter's Shelter for the Homeless, Ms. Sagawa is Public Policy Chairman of the Organization of Pan Asian American Women. She received an A.B., magna cum laude, from Smith College, -an M.Sc. from the London School of Economics, and a J.D., cum laude, from Harvard Law School. · �GLEN W. WHITE. of Lawrence, Kansas. Mr. White is the Director of Training at the Research and Training Center on Independent Living at the University of Kansas. He has done extensive research in the area of rehabilitative and therapeutic medicine, as evidenced by his many publications and presentations. His community service efforts include serving as President of the · Rochester Center for Independent Living, Inc., and as founding member and board member of Rochester Area Disabled Athletics and Recreation, Inc. Mr. White holds a B.A. in Psychology and Sociology from Winona State University, and an M.A. in Developmental and Child Psychology from the University of Kansas. GAYLE EDLUND WILSON. of Sacramento, California. Mrs. Wilson is the First Lady of the State of California, wife of Governor Pete Wilson. She is a current sustaining member and former President of the Junior League of San Diego. Mrs. Wilson has also served as a Board Member at the Center for Excellence in Education and on the Executive Committee at the Shakespeare Theatre in Washington, D.C., in addition to being active in ~mateur musical theater in San Diego. Mrs. Wilson launched the San Diego Chapter of Achievement Rewards for College Scientists (ARCS). She was a Phi Beta Kappa graduate from Stanford University. ROBERT L. WOODSON, of Washington, D.C. Mr. Woodson is President o~ the National Center for Neighborhood Enterprise and Chairman of the Council for a Black Economic Agenda. A former Resident Fellow and Director of the American Enterprise Institute's Neighborhood Revitalization Project, Mr. Woodson has also directed national and local community service programs that include work among a broad cross-section of Americans. He received a B.S. from Cheyney State College, an M.S.W. from the University of Pennsylvania and attended the University of Massachusetts doctoral program. KAREN SUSAN YOUNG. of Fremont, California. Ms. Young is the Communications Director of The Campus Outreach Opportunity League (COOL) • She has an extensive background in community service, including recruiting non-profit organizations to participate in workshops encouraging youth service and serving as head counselor at a camp for children with disabilities. Ms. Young was founder and Project Director of Global Education, Youth Education Services (YES), and a Project Director of Nutrition tor Kids, where she developed a series of 16 nutrition education presentations for low-income children. She received a B.A. in Home Economics from Humboldt State University. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1991_CM_1991-10-31_CNCS-Board-of-Directors-Nominees-Info Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting National Community Service Board of Directors nominees information Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting National Community Service Board of Directors nominees information. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49402 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1991-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/c7f4655433bf08228ddec4b3898c3e9b.pdf b3701d6bb26f838f42ef04ae10441bee PDF Text Text MICHIGAN COMMUNITY SERVICE COMMISSION .. AGENDA OCTOBER 31, 1991 OLDS PLAZA, 2ND FLOOR CABINET ROOM 10:00 A.M. - 2:00 p.M. 1. Welcome and Brief Remarks by Governor Engler 2. Introduction of Commissioners 3. Briefing on the National Community Service Act 4. Update on National Commission and Federal Grant Time lines 5. Review of Commissioners Briefing Notebook 6. LUNCH 7. Remarks by Chuck Supple, Vice President, Points of Light . Foundation. ~outh Engaged in Service (YES) _and an introduction of the Michigan YES Ambassadors Cynthia Scherer, and Trabian Shorters 8. Next Steps for Commission A. Goals and Objectives B. Subcommittee Structures 9. 10. Establishing Meeting Schedules Public Comments � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_MCSC_1991_CM_1991-10-31_Agenda Title A name given to the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting agenda Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Michigan Community Service Commission Description An account of the resource Michigan Community Service Commission 1991-10-31 commission meeting agenda. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Michigan Community Service Commission. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Community Service Commission Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1991-10-31 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/a240b1c6c28af1b6180f740de9172591.pdf dd47715f5817e1d5ad8f0d66f7b541fe PDF Text Text Council of Michigan Foundations K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project Plan of Work Goals, Objectives, Staff Assignments Fall 1999 WORK PLAN AND PROGRAM DETAIL i �Council of Michigan Foundations K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project Draft Plan of Work Goals, Objectives, Staff Assignments Fall 1999 Program Goals: 1. 2. 3. 4. Curriculum Development and Lesson Plans Teacher Professional Development School Improvement Parents Involvement, Youth Groups, and Congregations Support Goals: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Related Systems Dissemination Public Relations and Marketing Self-Sufficiency/Funding Steering Committee/Governance/Staffing Evaluation ii �Overview Mission and Goals MISSION The K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project will help perpetuate a civil society through the education of children about the independent sector, and will achieve their commitment to private citizen action for the public good. PROGRAM GOALS 1. Curriculum Development and Lesson Plans: Develop an original K-12 curriculum to be infused into the core academic curriculum of schools. The curriculum will teach children about philanthropy and will inspire them to continue as active volunteers and citizens. 2. Teacher Professional Development: Orient practicing and new teachers to the philanthropy curriculum, encourage their writing of additional lesson plans, and assist them in developing expertise in teaching philanthropy. 3. School Improvement: Work with school systems to promote school improvement through encouraging school-community-parent interaction and in implementing experiential educational opportunities in the community. 4. Parent Involvement, Youth Groups, and Congregations: Develop and implement programs with parents, schools, youth groups, and religious congregations to support and extend the teaching of philanthropy within the full ecology of a child's life. SUPPORT GOALS 1. Related Systems: Develop and collaborate on strengthening related systems that support the teaching of philanthropy to the next generation. 2. Dissemination: Disseminate the teaching of philanthropy in Michigan, nationally, and internationally. 3. Public Relations and Marketing: Provide ongoing public relations and marketing visibility to key educational and philanthropic audiences in Michigan, across the nation, and internationally. 4. Self-Sufficiency/Funding: Develop and implement a plan to make the project self-sufficient by 2010. 5. Steering Committee/Governance/Staffing: Continue Steering Committee leadership and involvement in the project planning and in implementation. Build professional resources to accomplish the tasks assigned 6. Evaluation: Implement and report on appropriate evaluation for the project. iii �Summary GOALS and OBJECTIVES Program Goals 1. Curriculum Development and Lesson Plans Develop an original K-12 curriculum to be infused into the core academic curriculum of schools. The curriculum will teach children about philanthropy and will inspire them to continue as active volunteers and citizens. Develop and Increase the Lesson Pool Complete the Curriculum Themes Complete the Standardized Assessment Develop and Increase Teacher Support Materials Develop and Increase Student Support Materials Infuse the Curriculum in Michigan Complete Responsibilities for Phase I 2. Teacher Professional Development Orient practicing and new teachers to the philanthropy curriculum, encourage their writing of additional lesson plans, and assist them in developing expertise in teaching philanthropy. Summer Residential Institutes Teacher Consultants Michigan I.S.D. Consultants Teachers of Philanthropy Membership Association Colleges of Education Discipline Based University Courses Centers on Philanthropy/Colleges of Education K-16 Philanthropy Education Teachers' Fellowship Program Teachers' Fellowship Summer Student Internships Teacher Development Videos 3. School Improvement Work with school systems to promote school improvement through encouraging school-community-parent interaction and in implementing experiential educational opportunities in the community. 4. Parent Involvement, School Improvement, Youth Groups, and Congregations 2 �Develop and implement programs with parents, schools, youth groups, and religious congregations to support and extend the teaching of philanthropy within the full ecology of a child's life. Parent Involvement Youth Groups Religious Congregation Support Goals 1. Related Systems Develop and collaborate on strengthening related systems that support the teaching of philanthropy to the next generation Local Advisory Committees Service-Learning 2. Dissemination Disseminate the teaching of philanthropy in Michigan, nationally, and internationally. Indiana Education Initiative Youth Educators Institute Advanced Seminars Ten Key States Ten Key Nations Curriculum "Kits" Web-site Dissemination CD-ROM Dissemination Sponsorship Localized Dissemination Journal Dissemination Conference Conference and Speakers Endorsement and Inclusion 3. Public Relations and Marketing Provide ongoing public relations and marketing visibility to key educational and philanthropic audiences in Michigan, across the nation, and internationally. Newsletter Membership Organization Conferences 3 �Web-site Publications Article Placement Video General Media 4. Self-Sufficiency/Funding Develop and implement a plan to make the project self-sufficient by 2010. 5. Steering Committee/Governance/Staff Resources Continue Steering Committee leadership and involvement in the project implementation. Build professional resources to accomplish the tasks assigned. Office Space Additional Staff Consultant Pool Volunteers Internships Graduate Student Research CMF Support 6. Evaluation Implement and report on appropriate evaluation for the project 4 �GOALS AND OBJECTIVES DETAIL 1. Curriculum Development and Lesson Plans Develop an original K-12 curriculum, to be infused into the core academic curriculum of schools. The curriculum will teach children about philanthropy and will inspire them to continue as active volunteers and citizens. Objectives: Develop and Increase the Lesson Pool  Involve practicing classroom teachers in research, writing, pilot-testing, field-testing and approving an ever-expanding pool of high quality original classroom lessons, K-12, that teach the four new themes of philanthropy education. Assure that each lesson ties directly into the Standards and Benchmarks currently promulgated for educators and that they can be infused into the academic core curriculum of a variety of public and private.  Complete at least two lessons for each grade-level component of the four curriculum themes. Complete the Curriculum Themes  Refine and publish an initial K-12 Philanthropy Curriculum organized around four themes, with learning objectives specified at grades 5, 8, and 11. The four themes to be developed are: A. Defining the Philanthropic Sector B. Philanthropy and Civil Society C. Philanthropy and the Individual D. Skills and Experience in Volunteerism and Service. Complete the Standardized Assessment  Write, pilot-test, field-test, and set benchmarks for standardized assessment tools of student learning about philanthropy at grades 5, 8, and 11. Finalize and distribute three different test booklets at each of the grade levels. Develop and implement a process for scoring and reporting. 5 �Develop and Increase Teacher Support Materials  Develop and disseminate high quality, K-12 focused, teacher support materials related directly to the expectations of the new curriculum and support the lessons. This includes: A. Briefing papers regarding the body of knowledge about philanthropy B. "Textbook"-like resources at early elementary, late elementary, middle school and high school C. Arts related media support including original music, drama, and analysis of literature D. Teacher oriented support materials such as models, bibliographies, and lexicons E. Work with other teacher discipline organizations (Michigan Geographic Alliance, Economics America etc). Infuse the Curriculum in Michigan  Provide incentive grants for a curriculum coordinator and materials for six school districts to infuse the lessons (K-2), (3-5), (6-8), and (9-12).  Document this process for replication in other schools and states.  Complete responsibilities for Phase I. 2. Teacher Professional Development Orient practicing and new teachers to the philanthropy curriculum, encourage their writing of additional lesson plans, and assist them in developing expertise in teaching philanthropy. Objectives: Summer Residential Institutes  Provide week-long summer residential institutes for teachers new to teaching philanthropy Summer 1999 One institute in Michigan for 30 teachers Summer 2000 Two institutes in Michigan for 50 teachers each (100 teachers total) One institute outside of Michigan for 50 teachers Summer 2001 Three institutes in Michigan for 50 teachers each (total of 150 teachers) Four institutes outside of Michigan for 50 teachers each (100 teachers) Summer 2002 One Advanced Institute for Experienced Philanthropy Teachers Three basic institutes for 50 Michigan teachers Eight institutes outside of Michigan Summer 2003 One Advanced Institute for Experienced Philanthropy Teachers Three basic institutes for 50 Michigan teachers Sixteen institutes outside of Michigan 6 �Four Advanced Institutes outside of Michigan  Provide week-long summer institutes for arts educators on teaching philanthropy and service-learning Summer 2000 One institute for 15 teachers in Michigan Summer 2001 One institute for 15 teachers in Indiana Summer 2001 One institute for 30 teachers in Michigan Summer 2001 One institute for 50 teachers in Michigan Summer 2002 One institute for 30 teachers in Indiana Summer 2002 One institute for 15 teachers in two other states Teacher Consultants  Initiate a new Teacher-Consultant pool composed of successful original project teachers, and successful graduates of the summer institutes. Each Teacher-Consultant will provide three in-service professional development experiences to colleagues each year. Michigan Intermediate School District Consultants  Support ten regional consultants housed at Intermediate School Districts as consultants on philanthropy education and service learning for the schools within their regional service area (2000-2003). Teachers of Philanthropy Membership Association  Initiate an international "Teachers of Philanthropy" organization to provide ongoing materials and support to teachers interested in continuing professional development related to teaching philanthropy. 1) The Teachers of Philanthropy organization will hold one state conference in 2000 2) One state conference, and one national conference in 2001 and thereafter 3) The Teachers of Philanthropy organization will have a newsletter, and journal. Colleges of Education  Involve each of the major teacher education colleges in research related to the K-12 project. Develop an elective course in philanthropy education for pre-service teachers. Discipline Based University Courses  Involve each of the social studies discipline organizations at the college level (economics, geography, government (political science), and history) in writing K-12 resource materials for teachers. Encourage the development of discipline based courses for majors that will include pre-service teachers. Centers on Philanthropy/Colleges of Education 7 � Encourage national university based Centers on Philanthropy to work together with their teacher colleges in joint courses regarding teaching philanthropy. K-16 Philanthropy Education in Michigan  Develop a joint proposal with Campus Compact regarding the K-16 implementation of service learning that includes the philanthropy content as the academic component. Teachers' Fellowship Program  Develop and institute a Philanthropy Teachers' Fellowship Program for four Michigan teachers each year (one from each grade band) 2000 At Indiana Center on Philanthropy 2001 At Indiana Center on Philanthropy and the Center on Philanthropy at Grand Valley State University (eight fellowships) Fellows will be required to research, write, and produce original teacher support material that extend the teaching of philanthropy K-12. Summer Student Internships  Hire pre-service teachers who have demonstrated potential for leadership in education as summer interns to the project. Teacher Development, Videos Develop videos at each of the four grade levels as a teacher development tool 3. School Improvement: Work with school systems to promote school improvement through encouraging school-community-parent interaction and in implementing experiential educational opportunities in the community. Objectives:  Identify the major school improvement efforts currently in favor in Michigan. Analyze the ties to philanthropy education.  Become involved in school improvement oriented organizations and efforts in Michigan. Look for opportunities to infuse the philanthropy curriculum. 4. Parent Involvement, Youth Groups, and Congregations Develop and implement programs with parents, schools, youth groups, and religious congregations to support and extend the teaching of philanthropy within the full ecology of a child's life. 8 �Objectives: Parent Involvement  Research, develop, field-test and implement a thoughtful strategy and materials for parent involvement in their children's education, particularly around the teaching of philanthropy.  Continue to connect with major school improvement efforts such as the Middle-Start program, Character Counts, service learning, school-to-work, Comer Schools, the Schools of the Twenty-first Century, and the Mott after-school program. Youth Groups  Research, develop, and implement the youth group strategies developed by Community Partnerships with Youth (a component of the Habits of the Heart project) in the seven youth development partner organizations and others throughout Michigan.  Provide mini-grants to youth groups. Religious Congregations  Research, develop, and implement the religious congregations strategies developed by the Search Institute (a component of the Habits of the Heart project) in religious congregations throughout Michigan.  Provide mini-grants to congregations. Support Goals 1. Related Systems Develop and collaborate on strengthening related systems that support the teaching of philanthropy to the next generation Objectives: Local Advisory Committees Develop and strengthen local advisory committees to philanthropy education, including community foundations, United Ways, business partnerships, and volunteer centers. Collaborate with other initiatives such as school-to work, and Communities in Schools.  Provide an incentive to Youth Advisory Committees of community foundations to encourage adoption of the new lessons. Service-Learning Participate in strengthening and extending service learning as a teaching tool in Michigan schools 9 �A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. 2. build on the 1999 survey of the status of service-learning build and extend the utilization of the service-learning web-site provide direct technical assistance to teachers in selected schools systems involve Learn and SERVE grantee schools in the Summer Institute continue professional development of service-learning school coordinators through the Summer Institute require each philanthropy unit to offer a service-learning component active involvement in issues of public policy in Michigan related to service-learning collaborate on a statewide youth workshop drawing together the youth volunteer systems in Michigan. Dissemination Disseminate the teaching of philanthropy in Michigan, nationally, and internationally. Objectives:  Indiana Education Initiative In cooperation with the Indiana Humanities Council and the Habits of the Heart project, develop and implement a strategy for infusing the teaching of philanthropy into school systems in the State of Indiana.  Youth Education Institute In cooperation with the Indiana Center on Philanthropy through the Habits of the Heart project, provide a series of summer institutes called "Youth Educator Institute". Participants would come as community teams composed of school teachers, religious instructors, youth group leaders, community leaders, and parents to be trained as teams on how a community can intentionally transmit the philanthropic tradition. A. Summer 2000 at Indiana University B. Summer 2001 at Indiana University C. Summer 2002 at Indiana University Replicated at a Michigan university Replicated at a partner state university.  Advanced Seminars Advanced seminars on philanthropy for all youth educators (teachers, religious instructors, community leaders, parents, and youth workers) A. Summer 2001 at Indiana University B. Summer 2002 at Indiana University C. Summer 2002 at a Michigan University  Ten Key States 10 �Identify and organize statewide leadership to replicate all of the components of the K-12 Education in Philanthropy project in 10 states in the United States. Utilize multiple networks such as community, private, corporate, and family foundations; educational professional organizations; universities; and the State Service Commissions. A. 2000-2001 add three states B. 2001-2002 add three states C. 2003-2003 add four states.  Ten Key Nations Identify and organize national leadership to replicate all of the components of the K-12 Education in Philanthropy project in 10 nations: 4 in Europe and the former Soviet-bloc nations, 2 in Africa, 2 in South America, 2 in Asia. A. work in collaboration with international funders such as private foundations, and the International Youth Foundation, CIVICUS, and the European Foundation Center B. utilize the internet as an international communications vehicle C. research, write, pilot-test, and field-test lessons and assessment instruments that translate into the cultures of the nation's with an interest in teaching philanthropy.  Curriculum "Kits" Develop and publish curriculum "kits" for individual schools and teachers interested in implementing the curriculum and lessons.  Web-site Dissemination A. disseminate individual lessons and teacher support materials through the web-site for ease of access throughout the world. B. connect web-site with colleague web-sites in Indiana (Habits of the Heart, Community Partnerships with Youth, Indiana University Center on Philanthropy). C. Where to put it.  CD ROM Dissemination Develop and disseminate the pool of lessons, curriculum themes, and teacher support materials via CD-ROM for ease in mailing and distribution.  Sponsorship Develop a relationship with a long-term sponsor for the project. An organization with an international reach and local memberships throughout the world such as the Rotary, Kiwanis, or other service organization. 11 � Localized Dissemination Develop and implement a local, geographic strategy for disseminating the project and for the professional development and support of the classroom teachers. A. Develop the local approach in Calhoun County, Michigan B. Use the Intermediate School District Consultants in Michigan C. Test the local approach throughout the counties in Michigan D. Pilot the strategy in the initial 10 states E. Pilot the strategy internationally.  Journal Publish a Journal of K-12 Philanthropy on a semi-annual basis. Develop a "juried" process for submission and acceptance that assures a high quality to the materials made available.  Dissemination Conference Hold a dissemination conference in 2003 for educators from throughout the world.  Conference and Speaker Circuit A. Attend and present materials regarding the philanthropy curriculum at all key educational and philanthropic conferences in Michigan and across the United States. Utilize the teacher-consultants as authentic presenters at these meetings. Utilize Steering Committee members as keynote speakers. B. Plan with Indiana partners joint presentations to identified audiences with interests common to all project participants such as: Independent Sector, Society for Experiential Learning, CIVICUS, etc. Each area will present individually to groups organized specifically in their areas of interest (education, religion, youth development, graduate philanthropy education), humanities councils).  Endorsement and Inclusion Seek the formal endorsement of the key educational and philanthropic organizations in Michigan, in each state, and across the United States. Engage these organizations in the dissemination of the project ideas and materials. 3. Public Relations and Marketing Provide ongoing public relations and marketing visibility to key educational and philanthropic audiences in Michigan, across the nation, and internationally. (* Items are important, others are either we publish or we don't items). Objectives: Newsletter*  Implement a quarterly newsletter with substance Conferences 12 � Develop, implement, and monitor presentations at all key conferences and seminars Publications  Publish and promote sales of lessons, curriculum themes, background papers, teacher support materials, Journal, institute materials, bookmarks, and other materials of the project Article Placement  Place articles in key, strategic, newsletters, journals, and the publications of other organizations Video  Develop a short high quality video about the project  Develop with the Indiana partners a video on all components of the project General Media*  Develop and implement strategies with the state and national general media including print, public radio, public television, and commercial television 4. Self-Sufficiency/Funding Develop and implement a plan to make the project self-sufficient by 2010. Objectives: Income Sources  Membership Fees  Publications and Royalties  Sponsorships  Web-site Income  Project Grants  Institute Fees  Government Contracts  Tuition splitting with Universities  Endowment Income  Scoring and Reporting of Standardized Tests  Fellowships  Professional Development Conference Fees  Fees from Schools on Implementation 13 �5. Steering Committee/Governance/ Staff Resources Continue Steering Committee leadership and involvement in the project implementation. Build professional resources to accomplish the tasks assigned. Continue with key committees and assignments Utilize Steering Committee members as speakers and presenters Office Space  Solve issues of office space Additional Staff  Add staff as needed and funded Consultant Pool  Utilize a pool of consultants as adjunct staff for special services. Volunteers  Utilize volunteers, students, "Teach for America", and Americorps/Vista workers Internships  Utilize summer internships Graduate Student Research  Utilize graduate student assistance on research needs. CMF Support  Provide for support costs from CMF President, Vice President-Finance, Accountant, Auditor, Public Relations 6. Evaluation Implement and report on appropriate evaluation for the project Formative and regular reporting Summative (Michigan and Habits of the Heart) Longitudinal 14 �Fall 1999 Work Plan Program Goals GOAL 1: CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND LESSON PLANS L = Responsible to lead accomplishment of Task C = Must be consulted I = Should be informed NI = Not Involved  = Potential Revenue Stream Develop an original K-12 curriculum to be infused into the core academic curriculum of schools. The curriculum will teach children about philanthropy and will inspire them to continue as active volunteers and citizens. Objectives: Develop and Increase the Lesson Pool  Involve practicing classroom teachers in research, writing, pilot testing, field-testing and approving an ever-expanding pool of high quality original classroom lessons, K-12, that teach the four new themes of philanthropy education. Assure that each lesson ties directly into the Standards and Benchmarks currently promulgated for educators and that they can be infused into the academic core curriculum of a variety of public and private schools.  Complete at least two lessons for each grade level component of the curriculum themes. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date 100 approved lessons with all the standards inserted-Terry final approval on standards 100 approved lessons final edit, and design I L C I I August 1999 C C L I I Sept. 1999 High school approved lessons on web site I I L I I Sept. 1999 Middle school approved lessons on web site I I L I I Sept. 1999 Elementary school approved lessons on web site I I L I I Oct. 1999 Printing of lessons for formal publication and sale/marketing plan C C L C C Nov. 1999 Assure 100 piloted lessons ready for Sept 1999 field-test as units I L I C C Sept. 1999 100 piloted lessons prepared for field-testing I L I C I Sept. 1999 C C I L I August 1999 Increase Preparation of field-test expectations) packet (cover letter, evaluation, 1 FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET �ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 Field-testing of 100 approved lessons, and 100 piloted lessons until 3-5 evaluations received of each unit (Mailing, tracking, stipend, thank you notes) Analysis of returned evaluations of field-tested lessons I I I C L I I I L I Sept. 1999 Mailed/ June 2000 Done June 2000 50 new units for piloted in classrooms in the fall of 1999 C L I C I Sept-Dec. 1999 Teacher volunteers for economics units I L I I I Sept 1999 Teacher training for economics units (schedule training, expectations for finishing) Scheduling and providing due dates for a normal rhythm for future developing, piloting, field-testing, approval, and placement of new lessons Schedule and hold Fairness Review Committee Meetings on Lessons as appropriate Assure at least two units are approved for each learning expectation in the themes Schedule and hold Curriculum Committee Meetings to approve units for adoption prior to Steering Committee meetings I L I I I Fall 1999 C L C C C December 1999 Forward C C I L I As needed C L I C I June 2003 C L I C I April of each year 2001-2002 2002-2003 Complete the Curriculum Themes  Refine and publish an initial K-12 Philanthropy Curriculum organized around four themes, with learning objectives specified at grades 5, 8, and 11. The four themes to be developed are: A. Defining the Philanthropic Sector B. Philanthropy and Civil Society C. Philanthropy and the Individual D. Skills and Experience in Volunteerism and Service. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 Final draft of themes ready for publication L C C C C Sept. 1999 Put themes on the web-site and publish C C L I I Oct. 1999 Question items realigned to new edited version of the themes L C C C C Sept. 1999 Approved lessons coded to the outcome items in the themes/holes identified C L I C I Sept. 1999 Field-testing lessons coded to the outcome items in the themes/holes identified C L I C I Sept. 1999 Pilot lessons coded to the outcome items in the themes/holes identified C L I C I Sept. 1999 2 2001-2002 2002-2003 �Indiana University background papers coded to the themes L C C C I Sept. 1999 Mini-grants to academic researchers to write further briefing papers L C C C I June 2000 Complete the Standardized Assessment  Write, pilot-test, field-test, and set benchmarks for standardized assessment tools of student learning about philanthropy at grades 5, 8, and 11. Finalize and distribute three different test booklets at each of the grade levels. Develop and implement a process for scoring and reporting. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 Staff item and test development committee of teachers I C I L I 2001-2002 2002-2003 Sept-June 1999 Develop and Increase Teacher Support Materials  Develop and disseminate high quality, K-12 focused, teacher support materials related directly to the expectations of the new curriculum and support the lessons. This includes: A. Briefing papers regarding the body of knowledge about philanthropy B. "Textbook"-like resources at early elementary, late elementary, middle school and high school C. Arts related media support including original music, drama, and analysis of literature D. Teacher oriented support materials such as models, bibliographies, and lexicons. E. Work with other teacher discipline organizations. ACTIVITY Kathy Briefing Papers Universitie s Dr. Joe Stoltm an Rick Kelly Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 "Textbook" Original Children's Music Original High School Drama Analysis of Literature Teacher Materials Dr. Ed Uehlin g Consultant s 3 2001-2002 2002-2003 �Develop and Increase Student Support Materials  Develop and disseminate high quality, K-12 focused books, CD-ROMs, and materials for students directly related to the content and expectations of the new curriculum. This includes: A. Student oriented classroom materials such as visual timelines, and photographs B. Original storybooks, poems, drama, and music. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 CD-ROM of Lessons and Themes Timelines Photographs Biographies Historic Events Student developed storybooks, poems Infuse the Curriculum in Michigan  Provide incentive grants for a curriculum coordinator and materials for six school districts to infuse the lessons (K-2) (3-5), (6-8), and (9-12).  Document this process for replication in other schools and states.  Complete responsibilities for Phase I. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 Select six school districts Offer incentive grants Provide staff in-service development Infuse into the school's social studies curriculum an articulated set of lessons Publish the results as case studies 4 2001-2002 2002-2003 �GOAL 2: TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Orient practicing and new teachers to the philanthropy curriculum, encourage their writing of additional lesson plans, and assist them in developing expertise in teaching philanthropy. Objectives: Summer Residential Institutes  Provide week-long summer residential institutes for teachers new to teaching philanthropy ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Summer 1999-One institute in Michigan for 30 teachers Summer 2000-Two institutes in Michigan for 50 teachers each (100 teachers total) One institute outside of Michigan for 50 teachers Summer 2001:Three institutes in Michigan for 50 teachers each (total of 150 teachers) Four institutes outside of Michigan for 50 teachers each (100 teachers) Summer 2002 One Advanced Institute for Experienced Philanthropy Teachers Three basic institutes for 50 Michigan teachers Eight institutes outside of Michigan Summer 2003: One Advanced Institute for Experienced Philanthropy Teachers Three basic institutes for 50 Michigan Teachers Sixteen institutes outside of Michigan Four Advanced Institutes outside of Michigan  Provide week-long summer institutes for arts educators on teaching philanthropy and service-learning ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 Summer 2000:One institute for 15 teachers in Michigan 5 2001-2002 2002-2003 �Summer 2001: One institute for 15 teachers in Indiana Summer 2001: One institute for 30 teachers in Michigan Summer 2001: One institute for 50 teachers in Michigan Summer 2002: One institute for 30 teachers in Indiana Summer 2002: One institute for 15 teachers in two other states Teacher Consultants  Initiate a new Teacher-Consultant pool composed of successful original project teachers, and successful graduates of the summer institutes. Each Teacher-Consultant will provide three inservice professional development experiences to colleagues each year. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Teacher Consultants Organize teacher-consultants in Michigan C L I C I WKKF I Sept. 1999 Forward Sept. 1999 Forward Sept. 1999 Identify teacher-consultants including those to be dropped from current teacher pool Policy on teacher-consultants work for CMF C L I C I C L I C Manual for teacher-consultants L C I C I Sept. 1999 Policy to Steering Committee L C I WKKF C I Sept. 1999 Teacher-consultant pay and paperwork C C I I L L I I I C L I I I Sept. 1999 Forward Sept. 1999 Forward Sept. 1999 Schedule teacher-consultants within budget /approve presentations at schools, ISD's, workshops and conferences Presentation materials (initial program) C Replenish materials and supplies I I I I L Annual teacher-consultant advisory committee C L I I I WKKF WKKF Sept. 1999 Forward Sept 1999 Michigan Intermediate School District Consultants  Support ten regional consultants housed at Intermediate School Districts as consultants on philanthropy education and service learning for the schools within their regional service area (2000-2003). ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 6 2001-2002 2002-2003 �ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Teachers of Philanthropy Membership Association  Initiate an international "Teachers of Philanthropy" organization to provide ongoing materials and support to teachers interested in continuing professional development related to teaching philanthropy. A. B. C. ACTIVITY The Teachers of Philanthropy organization will hold one state conference in 2000 One state conference, and one national conference in 2001 and thereafter The Teachers of Philanthropy organization will have a newsletter, and journal. Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Colleges of Education  Involve each of the major teacher education colleges in research related to the K-12 project. Develop an elective course in philanthropy education for pre-service teachers. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Discipline Based University Courses  Involve each of the social studies discipline organizations at the college level (economics, geography, government (political science), and history) in writing K-12 resource materials for teachers. Encourage the development of discipline based courses for majors that will include pre-service teachers. 7 �ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Centers on Philanthropy/Colleges of Education  Encourage national university based Centers on Philanthropy to work together with their teacher colleges in joint courses regarding teaching philanthropy. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2002-2003 K-16 Philanthropy Education in Michigan Develop a joint proposal with Campus Compact regarding the K-16 implementation of service learning that includes the philanthropy content as the academic component. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 Teachers' Fellowship Program  Develop and institute a Philanthropy Teachers' Fellowship Program for four Michigan teachers each year (one from each  grade band) 2002 2003 At Indiana Center on Philanthropy At Indiana Center on Philanthropy and the Center on Philanthropy at Grand Valley State University (eight fellowships) Fellows will be required to research, write, and produce original teacher support material that extend the teaching of philanthropy K-12 8 2001-2002 2002-2003 �ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Summer Student Internships  Hire pre-service teachers who have demonstrated potential for leadership in education as summer interns to the project. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Teacher Development, Videos  Develop videos at each of the four grade levels as a teacher development tool ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 9 2001-2002 2002-2003 �GOAL 3: SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT Work with school systems to promote school improvement through encouraging school-community-parent interactions and in implementing experiential educational opportunities in the community.  Continue to connect with major school improvement efforts such as the middle-start program, Character Counts, service learning, school-to-work. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 10 2001-2002 2002-2003 �GOAL 4: PARENT INVOLVEMENT, YOUTH GROUPS, AND CONGREGATIONS Develop and implement programs with parents, schools, youth groups, and religious congregations to support and extend the teaching of philanthropy within he full ecology of a child's life. Objectives: Parent Involvement  Research, develop, field-test and implement a thoughtful strategy and materials for parent involvement in their children's education, particularly around the teaching of philanthropy. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2002-2003 Infuse the philanthropy curriculum and service learning into the core social studies academic curriculum of Michigan schools. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2001-2002 2002-2003 Continue to connect with major school improvement efforts such as the Middle-Start program, Character Counts, service learning, school-to-work, Comer Schools, the Schools of the Twenty-first Century, and the Mott after-school program. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 11 2001-2002 2002-2003 �Youth Groups  Research, develop, and implement the youth group strategies developed by Community Partnerships with Youth (a component of the Habits of the Heart project) in the seven youth development partner organizations and others throughout Michigan. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2002-2003 Provide mini-grants to youth groups. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Religious Congregations  Research, develop, and implement the religious congregations strategies developed by the Search Institute (a component of the Habits of the Heart project) in religious congregations throughout Michigan. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  Provide mini-grants to congregations. 12 2001-2002 2002-2003 �ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 13 2001-2002 2002-2003 �GOAL: CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT AND LESSON PLANS Develop an original K-12 curriculum, to be infused into the core academic curriculum of schools. The curriculum will teach children about philanthropy and will inspire them to continue as active volunteers and citizens. Objectives: Local Advisory Committees  Develop and strengthen local advisory committees to philanthropy education, including community foundations, United Ways, business partnerships, and volunteer centers. Collaborate with other initiatives such as school-to work, and Communities in Schools. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2002-2003 Provide an incentive to Youth Advisory Committees of community foundations to encourage adoption of the new lessons. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 Service-Learning  Participate in strengthening and extending service-learning as a teaching tool in Michigan schools A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. build on the 1999 survey of the status of service-learning build and extend the utilization of the service-learning web-site provide direct technical assistance to teachers in selected schools systems involve Learn and SERVE grantee schools in the Summer Institute continue professional development of service-learning school coordinators through the Summer Institute require each philanthropy unit to offer a service-learning component active involvement in issues of public policy in Michigan related to service-learning collaborate on a statewide youth workshop drawing together the youth volunteer systems in Michigan. 14 2001-2002 2002-2003 �ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 Survey Finalize State Survey L NI C NI NI September 1999 Print and Distribute Survey C NI L I C September 1999 Develop and distribute PowerPoint of results C NI L I NI September 1999 Decide on next data steps L C C C NI October 1999 Finish MDE web site and Listserv I I L I NI August 1999 Complete grant to Jackson and pay I I L NI C August 1999 Arrange for continuation grant with MDE C I L NI NI August 1999 Make second grant to new grantee(s) C I L NI NI August 1999 Lego's permission for MDE graphics I NI L NI NI August 1999 Lego's explanation on web site I NI L NI NI August 1999 Spring Report L C NI NI NI July 1999 Next Grant request L C NI NI NI July 1999 Billing issue resolved L NI NI NI NI July 1999 Connie Jones/Other consultants L C NI NI NI September 1999 Aspen Research Application L NI NI C NI September 1999 WKKF Grant/CMF L NI NI NI NI September 1999 Support Letter to MDE L NI NI NI NI August 1999 Policy Meeting follow-up L I NI I NI September 1999 State plan and follow-up L I NI I NI September 1999 Web site Service-learning, TA Service-learning Leadership Council 15 2001-2002 2002-2003 �GOAL: TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DELOPMENT Orient practicing and new teachers to the philanthropy curriculum, encourage their writing of additional lesson plans, and assist them in developing expertise in teaching philanthropy. Objectives:  Indiana Education Initiative  In cooperation with the Indiana Humanities Council and the Habits of the Heart project, develop and implement a strategy for infusing the teaching of philanthropy into school systems in the State of Indiana. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2002-2003 Youth Education Institute In cooperation with the Indiana Center on Philanthropy through the Habits of the Heart project, provide a series of summer institutes called "Youth Educator Institute". Participants would come as community teams composed of schoolteachers, religious instructors, youth group leaders, community leaders, and parents to be trained as teams on how a community can intentionally transmit the philanthropic tradition. A. B. C. D. E. Summer 2000 at Indiana University Summer 2001 at Indiana University Summer 2002 at Indiana University Replicated at a Michigan university Replicated at a partner state university. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 Advanced Seminars Advanced seminars on philanthropy for all youth educators (teachers, religious instructors, community leaders, parents, and youth workers) A. Summer 2001 at Indiana University B. Summer 2002 at Indiana University C. Summer 2002 at a Michigan University 16 2001-2002 2002-2003 �ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2002-2003 Ten Key States Identify and organize statewide leadership to replicate all of the components of the K-12 Education in Philanthropy project in 10 states in the United States. Utilize multiple networks such as community, private, corporate, and family foundations; educational professional organizations; universities; and the State Service Commissions. A. 2000-2001 add three states B. 2001-2002 add three states C. 2003-2003 add four states. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2002-2003 Ten Key Nations Identify and organize national leadership to replicate all of the components of the K-12 Education in Philanthropy project in 10 nations: 4 in Europe and the former Soviet-bloc nations, 2 in Africa, 2 in South America, 2 in Asia. A. work in collaboration with international funders such as private foundations, and the International Youth Foundation, CIVICUS, and the European Foundation Center B. utilize the internet as an international communications vehicle C. research, write, pilot-test, and field-test lessons and assessment instruments that translate into the cultures of the nation's with an interest in teaching philanthropy. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  Curriculum "Kits" Develop and publish curriculum "kits" for individual schools and teachers interested in implementing the curriculum and lessons. 17 2001-2002 2002-2003 �ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2002-2003 Web-site Dissemination A. B. disseminate individual lessons and teacher support materials through the web-site for ease of access throughout the world. connect web-site with colleague web-sites in Indiana (Habits of the Heart, Community Partnerships with Youth, Indiana University Center on Philanthropy). ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2001-2002 2002-2003 CD ROM Dissemination Develop and disseminate the pool of lessons, curriculum themes, and teacher support materials via CD-ROM for ease in mailing and distribution. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2002-2003 Sponsorship Develop a relationship with a long-term sponsor for the project. An organization with an international reach and local memberships throughout the world such as the Rotary, Kiwanis, or other service organization. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 18 2001-2002 2002-2003 � Localized Dissemination Develop and implement a local, geographic strategy for disseminating the project and for the professional development and support of the classroom teachers. A. Develop the local approach in Calhoun County, Michigan B. Use the Intermediate School District Consultants in Michigan C. Test the local approach throughout the counties in Michigan D. Pilot the strategy in the initial 10 states E. Pilot the strategy internationally. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2002-2003 Journal Publish a Journal of K-12 Philanthropy on a semi-annual basis. Develop a "juried" process for submission and acceptance that assures a high quality to the materials made available. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2002-2003 Dissemination Conference Hold a dissemination conference in 2003 for educators from throughout the world. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2002-2003 Conference and Speaker Circuit A. B. Attend and present materials regarding the philanthropy curriculum at all key educational and philanthropic conferences in Michigan and across the United States. Utilize the teacher-consultants as authentic presenters at these meetings. Utilize Steering Committee members as keynote speakers. Plan with Indiana partners joint presentations to identified audiences with interests common to all project participants such as: Independent Sector, Society for Experiential Learning, CIVICUS, etc. Each area will present individually to groups organized specifically in their areas of interest (education, religion, youth development, graduate philanthropy education), humanities councils). 19 �ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2002-2003 Endorsement and Inclusion Seek the formal endorsement of the key educational and philanthropic organizations in Michigan, in each state, and across the United States. Engage these organizations in the dissemination of the project ideas and materials. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 20 2001-2002 2002-2003 �GOAL: PARENTS INVOLVEMENT, SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT, YOUTH GROUPS, AND CONGREGATIONS Develop and implement programs with parents, youth groups, and religious congregations to support and extend the teaching of philanthropy within the full ecology of a child's life. Objectives: Parent Involvement  ACTIVITY Research, develop, field-test and implement a thoughtful strategy and materials for parent involvement in their children's education, particularly around the teaching of philanthropy. Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 21 2001-2002 2002-2003 �GOAL: related systems Develop and collaborate on strengthening related systems that support the teaching of philanthropy to the next generation. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 GOAL: DISSEMINATION Disseminate the teaching of philanthropy in Michigan, nationally, and internationally. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 22 2001-2002 2002-2003 �GOAL: PUBLIC RELAIONS AND MARKETING Provide ongoing public relations and marketing visibility to key educational and philanthropic audiences in Michigan, across the nation, and internationally. Objectives: Newsletter  Implement a quarterly newsletter with substance ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Membership Organization  Develop and implement the membership association: Teachers of Philanthropy ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Conferences  ACTIVITY Develop, implement, and monitor presentations at all key conferences and seminars Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 23 2001-2002 2002-2003 �ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Web-site  Develop, monitor, and continue to enrich the web-site ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Publications  Publish and promote sales of lessons, curriculum themes, background papers, teacher support materials, Journal, institute materials, bookmarks, and other materials of the project ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Article Placement  ACTIVITY Place articles in key, strategic, newsletters, journals, and the publications of other organizations Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 24 2001-2002 2002-2003 �Video  Develop a short high quality video about the project ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001  2001-2002 2002-2003 Develop with the Indiana partners a video on all components of the project ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 General Media  ACTIVITY Develop and implement strategies with the state and national general media including print, public radio, public television, and commercial television Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 25 2001-2002 2002-2003 �GOAL: SELF-SUFFICIENCY/FUNDING Develop and implement a plan to make the project self-sufficient by 2010. Objectives: Income Sources  Membership Fees  Publications and Royalties  Sponsorships  Web-site Income  Project Grants  Institute Fees  Government Contracts  Tuition splitting with Universities  Endowment Income  Scoring and Reporting of Standardized Tests  Fellowships  Professional Development Conference Fees  Fees from Schools on Implementation ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 26 2001-2002 2002-2003 �GOAL: STEERING COMMITTEE AND GOVERNANCE Continue Steering Committee leadership and involvement in the project implementation. Continue with key committees and assignments Utilize Steering Committee members as speakers and presenters ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 27 2001-2002 2002-2003 �GOAL: STAFF RESOURCES Build professional resources to accomplish the tasks assigned. Office Space  Solve issues of office space ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Additional Staff  Add staff as needed and funded ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Consultant Pool  Utilize a pool of consultants as adjunct staff for special services. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 28 2001-2002 2002-2003 �Volunteers  Utilize volunteers, students, "Teach for America", and Americorps/Vista workers ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Internships  Utilize summer internships ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 2001-2002 2002-2003 Graduate Student Research  Utilize graduate student assistance on research needs. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 CMF Support  Provide for support costs from CMF President, Vice President-Finance, Accountant, Auditor, Public Relations 29 2001-2002 2002-2003 �ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 30 2001-2002 2002-2003 �GOAL: EVALUATION Implement and report on appropriate evaluation for the project. ACTIVITY Kathy Terry Rita Tom Judy Due Date FUNDERS 1999-2000 BUDGET 2000-2001 31 2001-2002 2002-2003 �PROPOSED ORGANIZATIONAL CHART 32 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG_1999_Draft-Plan-of-Work-and-Program-Detail Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give 1999 draft plan of work and program detail Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give 1999 draft plan of work and program detail. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49402 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1999 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/b92c9892d9b369d3af1d45b803bab9e3.pdf 62b669861a24221537e6ce017e0d7946 PDF Text Text Date: September 29, 1998 To: Dorothy A. Johnson Russell G. Mawby From: Kathy Agard Re: K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project Budget I met with Dave Lindberg regarding the core budget for the K-12 Project. The budget actually looks pretty good. We saved money (a mixed blessing) when some of the schools were unable to find substitute teachers last fall. This was a "big ticket" item and was not expensed as planned. We also have been saving money on meetings by meeting on Saturdays, saving substitute teacher costs, and by meeting at schools rather than hotels. We have 18 months left in the Kellogg Grant. The line items as of August are: Personnel: 17 months of money left, expensed at the current rate (This does not include raises in April 1999. Also, we may have contractual issues with Terry and Judy. In their appointment contracts we may have assured employment through February 2000. These will cause some minor shrinkage in the total amount available…but worst case we have from 15-17 months of money for salaries [October 1999].) Office: 28 months of money left We have saved because of the Muskegon Area Intermediate School District (MAISD) and the National Board for Professional Teaching Standards (NBPTS) offering us inexpensive space. We could transfer some money from this line item if needed. Curriculum Development: We have $182,156 left. This is the largest budget area and is where all expenses related to the lesson plans and teachers occur. We will pay for the first round of field testing from this line item, as well as all teacher meetings, etc. While the field-testing will be an expensive item, there is a substantial amount of money left. Page - 1 - �Grants: We have $44,015 left These are mini-grants given on a matching basis to the project schools to help defray any expenses associated with service learning or the new lessons. We have four more grantmaking periods and will probably use most of this money. Travel: We have $13,398 left in travel. Our presentations at national meetings will begin to eat at this line item. But we will be able to make it easily until February 1999 when our report is due and any adjustments can be requested. Dissemination: We have $16,720 left We will need to request further funds to cover the newsletter. This amount will cover the brochures and the initial costs for developing the newsletter. Technology: We have 10,756 left The Michigan State University (MSU) contract for this year is for $73,000. I will try to negotiate this down some, and we should start to think about another alternative for the third year. But, I don't think we can pull away from MSU yet. We still need their technical support and they own the computers for another year. At the end of the third year they are depreciated from MSU's inventory and become legally the property of the teachers. (MSU has a policy that they will not compete with private computer vendors. This was one way to accomplish what we requested without violating their policy.) An option would be to see if MSU would wave their administrative fee for this contract this year. Almost half of the contract is the university overhead. In short, the budget looks healthier than I had anticipated. The following chart gives some indication where we are related to the other potential funding. Cc: David R. Lindberg Page - 2 - �Research, Writing, Testing, Dissemination in Michigan, Assessment 1997/98 1998/99 1999/2000 2000/2001 PERSONNEL Kathy WKKF WKKF Anonymous WKKF Anonymous Anonymous Terry WKKF WKKF WKKF Anonymous WKKF Anonymous Anonymous Judy Linda Frank Tom Hirsch Surdna Lilly WKKF Anonymous WKKF Anonymous Surdna Lilly Anonymous McGregor Skillman Ford Lilly Anonymous McGregor Skillman Ford Anonymous Anonymous McGregor Skillman Ford McGregor Skillman WKKF WKKF McGregor Skillman WKKF McGregor Skillman WKKF McGregor Skillman WKKF McGregor Skillman WKKF WKKF WKKF WKKF WKKF WKKF WKKF WKKF WKKF WKKF Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous Anonymous 1/2 Time Support and Parenting Marketing OFFICE LESSONS Teachers Minigrants Library Books School Grants Teacher Meetings Field Testing Continued Integration in Michigan on National Dissemination 2001/2002 Anonymous Page - 3 - 2002/2003 Continued National Integration, International Dissemination 2003/2004 2004/2005 2005/2006 �Research, Writing, Testing, Dissemination in Michigan, Assessment National Conf. Foundation Lessons Standards Software Continued Integration in Michigan on National Dissemination Ford Ford Ford Ford Ford Ford Anonymous Ford Ford Anonymous Ford Ford Anonymous Ford Ford PARENTING McGregor Skillman McGregor Skillman McGregor Skillman PUBLICATIONS Ford Ford Ford DISSEMINATION Mott WKKF Mott WKKF Mott COMMUNITY Mott Mott Mott TEXTBOOK PLANNING Mott Mott Mott SERVICE LEARNING CONSULTING Michigan Deparment of Education Michigan Deparment of Education Michigan Deparment of Education INSTITUTES Train Trainers McGregor Skillman Page - 4 - Continued National Integration, International Dissemination �EVALUATION Research, Writing, Testing, Dissemination in Michigan, Assessment Lilly Lilly Lilly McGregor McGregor Skillman Skillman Continued Integration in Michigan on National Dissemination Continued National Integration, International Dissemination Skillman McGregor COMPUTERS WKKF WKKF WKKF RANDOM INCOME CMU CMU CMU CMU Teachers' dues Teachers' dues Ford Teachers' dues While there is partial funding requested from each of the funders listed by line item, not every line item will be fully funded even if the requested grant funds are received. Other funding possibilities are: Kauffman Packard Return to Carnegie? Lilly Endowment in the Spring Department of Education Corporate Funders? Ameritech Page - 5 - � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG_1998-09-29_Internal-Financial-Report Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give 1998-09-29 internal financial report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give 1998-09-29 internal financial report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 1998-09-29 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/aec7c7719400537a214b059d77d51396.pdf b82597f7114a5650901d6bf10bddf21d PDF Text Text ARCHETECH LLC 4200 Wisconsin Ave. NW Washington DC 20016 202-966-2830 PROPOSAL TO PROVIDE PROFESSIONAL SERVICES Purpose The purpose of this proposal by Archetech LLC (AT) is to present the K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project (EPP) a systematic approach to maximizing business opportunities in support of and consistent with the project’s mission 1. This objective is in accord with both the conclusions reached at a Strategic Planning Meeting of the EPP held on December 7, 1999, chaired by Dr. Russell Mawby, and with EPP’s goal of planning for the long term teaching of philanthropy beyond grant funding. Background In Phase 1 of its business operations, EPP successfully demonstrated the existence of a market for philanthropy education products and its ability to access the market through the K-12 educational system. In addition, EPP’s value added approach to teaching philanthropy by infusing it into existing curriculum was validated in Phase One as a viable methodology. In its next stage of development, EPP’s primary business challenge will be to assure the project’s long term sustainability by commercializing aspects of the project that permit EPP to transition from grant funding to earned income. This objective needs to be accomplished without compromising EPP’s current and future not-for-profit franchise value. Toward that end, EPP has adopted a business strategy utilizing the World Wide Web as a primary access and distribution channel for EPP products and services. This business model positions EPP to: • maintain and sustain its not-for-profit identity in the short and long term • generate revenues through commercialization of marketing and distribution activities • maintain its operational focus on the design and creation all components of philanthropy education including lessons, books, learning tools, collateral materials etc. • maximize the scale and scope of the project while minimizing exposure to high level of risks associated with startup businesses. 1 The K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project (EPP) seeks to perpetuate a civil society by the education of children about the independent sector, and to inspire their commitment to private citizen action intended for the common good. �2 PROPOSAL Archetech LLC will assist EPP to identify strategic partnerships to fund and develop a philanthropy education vertical portal to serve as a hub for information dissemination and commerce. Partnership Criteria AT will target cornerstone companies for partnership who: • place a high value on reaching the educational community marketplace • offer products or services compatible with EPP mission • offer premier name or branding value to partnership • premier companies who value stewardship identity These partnerships will be structured to provide EPP with: • revenue sharing as a result of advertising and products or services sold • symbiotic or other non-monetary value such as desired technology or intellectual property • new content or other collateral material AT will not solicit partnerships from any companies that produce or advocate products that are harmful to children, illegal, discriminate or are deemed inappropriate by social practice. In addition to its own resources, AT will aggregate and coordinate priority contact information from the EPP and CMF communities as necessary to expand and refine project sales activities. Deliverables To achieve this objective, Archetech LLC will deliver EPP a mix of professional services in stages as described below. While this schedule and action plan serves as a starting point, uncertainties in the development process require the plan to thought of as a fluid work in progress at all times. STAGE I Deliverable 1 Archetech will solicit partnerships with cornerstone companies in the form of joint venture or licensing arrangement to underwrite: 1. Yr 2000 curriculum content creation - This funding would allow EPP to accelerate and complete content creation, and ($1 million projected) 2. Stage II business plan development costs - legal, sales, promotion, travel, professional fees, web site development etc. ($200,000 projected) �3 Deliverable 2 AT will take the lead (rationale and content) in developing collateral materials necessary to support Stage I sales and promotional activities including a: • one page document describing history and progress to date • two page document describing development plan • computer PowerPoint sales presentation Deliverable 3 AT will initiate activities to identify a national strategic partner (service clubs such as Rotary, Kiwanis or Lions) to promote EPP services and products offerings at the community level. Deliverable 4 AT will identify and recommend individuals for membership on a business advisory board to provide support to various aspects of the project Deliverable 5 AT will prepare a written report of Stage I activities which will include recommendations for Stage II activities. STAGE II To successfully implement this strategy, a business plan, consistent with the EPP mission, needs to be developed to guide management near and long-term decisionmaking. This plan would describe in detail: • how the not-for-profit and for-profit entities will relate to one another • EPP and partnership Internet marketing strategies including: 1. Market analysis 2. Market research 3. Marketing positioning for various audiences (1 or 2 Web sites?) 4. Competitive analysis • description of the core functionality of the web site including; 1. How the web site will be integrated with the written curriculum 2. Underwriting support for designing, developing, serving and maintaining the commercial Web site • financial projections for the venture Stage II activities would be triggered by fulfillment of Stage I funding goals. STAGE III Stage III activities would operationalize the business plan developed in Stage II. Time for Performance and Personnel Performing the Work Archetech estimates performance of Stage I activities will be completed within 120 days of the date a letter of engagement is executed by the parties. Work will begin immediately on that date. Messrs. Ed Stone, Paul Baker and Doug Monroe will perform tasks of the proposal for Archetech LLC unless otherwise mutually agreed, except for certain secretarial/ administrative functions. �4 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG-BP_ARCHETECH-Proposal Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give ARCHETECH proposal Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give ARCHETECH proposal. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49425 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d949286b6fda0e0398be9fdcfc987b0c.pdf 7adb237269cfb3a9cd5484aaf74677f1 PDF Text Text A Sponsorship Opportunity Three years ago, the Council of Michigan Foundations created a project without precedent to revolutionize the way students learn about the power of personal giving. The project began in response to the marked decline in civility in American society, as documented in such works as “Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community” by Robert D. Putnam. The project, initially known as the K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project, set out to expand the popular definition of philanthropy to include the giving of time and talent as well as money by people of all ages and from all strata of society. At the heart of the project was the desire to educate a new generation of young people about the value and historic role of the nation’s not-for-profit sector, which includes civic clubs and volunteer groups of all types. The visionary nature of the project has uncovered a hunger for education about making individual contributions. The project has evolved into a movement that can make a vital contribution to America’s future as a civil society. Already, it has spawned successful courses in philanthropy. The council’s research identified schools as the only viable conduit for reaching children in all parts of society and all parts of the country. The goal of the project is to create a demand for its materials and to make all the material available at little or no cost on an Internet portal. After its initial three-year phase, which was largely funded by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the project is moving into a bolder phase. It plans to grow nationally and has adopted a new name: Learning To Give. Much of the needed coursework and many of the supporting materials have been developed during the research and development period. Many teachers have been trained and plans have been created to train more on the Web. The first generation website is already on the Internet and will be expanded to serve teachers, students, parents and communities as the project progress. The project has formed a not-for-profit entity to oversee the growth of the program, from its initial phase. Learning To Give is now seeking corporate sponsorship to make the move onto the national stage. Sponsors will receive the extraordinary benefit of playing a leading role in a national movement to teach young people the best of American traditions, with the goal of perpetuating a civil society. Sponsorships will be based on the principles developed for Public Broadcasting System sponsors. Learning To Give is well established in Michigan. Soon it will move into California. It has been successfully replicated in courses at an Atlanta prep school and a major private university in the South. An enormously positive experience is available to the right sponsor. We invite and urge your participation in this vital undertaking. For further information, please contact: Kathryn Agard, Ed.D. Executive Director Learning to Give 630 Harvey Street • Muskegon, Michigan 49442-2398 Tel: (231) 767-7206 • Fax: (231) 773-0707 E-Mail: kagard@remc4.k12.mi.us • Website: www.LearningtoGive.org � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG-SP_2001-01_Sponsorship-Opportunity_2 Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give 2001-01 sponsorship opportunity 2 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give 2001-01 sponsorship opportunity 2. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49476 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-01 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/04825d15a011dd82aace4f3ff4ce3886.pdf 09402b010c96350b656fcee8d23649a9 PDF Text Text A Sponsorship Opportunity In times of unprecedented prosperity at the dawn of the 21st century, America faces a civic crisis. A troubling undercurrent has entered our national culture—a failure to transmit the social and democratic values of civic engagement from one generation to the next. This breakdown poses a significant threat to our tradition as a civil society. Three years ago, the Council of Michigan Foundations created the K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project (now known as Learning to Give). The purpose of the project is to perpetuate a civil society by educating children about the independent sector and to inspire their commitment to private citizen action intended for the common good. In its initial phase of operations, the Project demonstrated its power to mobilize the great change agents of American life—our youth. Learning to Give is now seeking corporate support to launch the program onto the national stage. Corporate sponsorship will enable us to:  Implement a national dissemination plan to offer schools and communities access to Learning to Give resources;  Complete and test a comprehensive K-12 curriculum that can be adapted to any educational environment; and  Build understanding of civic responsibility and individual community service by young people. Sponsors will be actively and positively associated with a grassroots national movement to create an enhanced sense of community among our youth. Specifically, Learning to Give will:  Prominently credit sponsors in all print and media materials publicizing the Project;  Acknowledge sponsors as national corporate citizens in hundreds of state and national venues;  Ensure that sponsors receive branded presence on all multimedia presentations that we develop;  Recognize sponsors for their stewardship role formally and informally at meetings of national educational and philanthropic organizations;  Credit sponsors with integrating Learning to Give into their employee development programs; and  Encourage sponsors to participate in Project advisory groups and other affiliated organizations promoting the Project in the media. At a time when key traditions important to our way of life are endangered, Learning to Give will transmit fundamental American values of civic responsibility and community service to our youth. By doing so, the Project will not only add meaning and abundance to their lives, but will also renew our nation’s tradition of individual commitment to the common welfare. For further information, please contact: Kathryn Agard, Ed.D., Executive Director Learning to Give 630 Harvey Street • Muskegon, Michigan 49442-2398 • Tel: (231) 767-7206 • Fax: (231) 773-0707 E-Mail: kagard@remc4.k12.mi.us • Website: www.LearningtoGive.org � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG-SP_2001-01_Sponsorship-Opportunity_1 Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give 2001-01 sponsorship opportunity 1 Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give 2001-01 sponsorship opportunity 1. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49475 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-01 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/96f67a3a4092e2de1a0f211d482ed5de.pdf 476d21ab1618a905d8d3884a7c9daf0a PDF Text Text The “Learning to Give” Project The Learning to Give Project is seeking funding to extend and expand the work of the K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project to a national scale. With sufficient funding in place the Project will bring a renewed understanding of the value of community involvement through personal giving back into communities throughout the United States. Applying the Sponsorship Model. The Learning to Give Project is designed to be supported by private philanthropy provided by corporate and foundation sponsors. While the Project will exploit to the extent appropriate any revenue-generating opportunities created during the course of the Project, it is expected that sponsorships will constitute the bulk of future Project funding. The Project's approach to its sponsors will be guided by principles first developed by American public broadcasting to manage sponsors and underwriters of television and radio programming. Those principles, modified for this project, are that:    Editorial control of the Project and its component parts will rest solely with the Project's principals (its management and governing bodies). No funding arrangements will create the perception of editorial control by anyone other than project principals or that the Project has been inappropriately influenced by its funding sources. All rights to the Project and its component parts shall remain with the Project's principals. Within these limits, sponsors and underwriters will be afforded every opportunity to associate their activities with the vision, mission and goals of the Project and to extend the level of the association through all appropriate venues. The Learning To Give Project will be designed to generate a high, positive public relations profile to support its national outreach objectives. The Project will work to actively raise the awareness of the significance of public philanthropy among many targeted constituencies as a way to build support for the Project and its local partners. This environment will provide potential sponsors with significant opportunities to associate themselves with this attractive, positive, community-focused effort. Specifically, the Project will make sponsorship an attractive promotion opportunity by:      Generating significant print, Internet and other media materials that will allow sponsors to receive supporting credit, Providing the sponsors with a path to building image awareness with American youth, Actively positioning the Project favorably with opinion-leading demographic groups, among business leaders and other key constituencies, Promoting the Project aggressively in national media, and Creating a positive association between the sponsor and a positive, community-building program with a nationwide audience. The Project represents an opportunity of unassailable merit for corporate stewardship by using the economic power and influence of the private sector to fuel this critical action for the common good through the independent sector – the nonprofit arena that has produced so many benefits for civic life in America. �-2Companies and other sponsors that become associated with the Project, through sponsorship, will accrue both prestige and a large measure of national good will. Proposed Application of Funds Funds received to support of the Project will be used to:  Complete, validate, and distribute the full K-12 philanthropy curriculum begun by the K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project,  Establish a national network of regional Project coordinators to facilitate and support state-based Learning to Give organizations,  Create and disseminate testing tools and textbooks in support of classroom teachers integrating the Project into their classrooms,  Rebuild and substantially extend the Internet presence of the Project and its utility to teachers, students, and other interested parties, and  Guide a national movement to develop renewed interest in applying the principles of personal philanthropy at the community level. The Project is designed to expand the conventional concept of philanthropy (financial giving) to include volunteerism (the giving of time and talent to help others). It will also,    Mobilize the natural change agents of American life, its children and youth, Educate these children about the value of the independent, not-for-profit sector to their communities and to society, and Empower children to contribute to that society through their own personal philanthropy. Learning to Give will also leverage today’s communications technologies to create, distribute and support a set of educational tools and other resources intended help local communities teach their children the value of personal philanthropy – the value of giving, serving and taking personal action for the common good of their community. The Project will work with local supporters and through public schools to integrate a complete philanthropy curriculum into the existing courseware at all grade levels. The goal is to make an understanding and appreciation of the value of personal giving a fundamental part of each child’s core education. �-3The Operating Plan Establish a 501(c)(3) Entity The Project will establish itself as a new 501(c) (3) not-for-profit organization and will assume all of the existing assets and liabilities of the K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project with the concurrence and support of Council of Michigan Foundations -- founders of the original Project. This change is intended to allow the Project to easily establish itself as a “national” entity and enable it to pursue national funding. Establish A Board of Directors A Board of Directors with eleven members will provide governance to the Project. The Board will include at a minimum:    The Executive Director of the Council of Michigan Foundations The Senior Executive of the Learning To Give Project, and A representative named by each of the three largest financial supporters of the Project. It is expected that the Board will meet monthly during the first two years operations and will meet thereafter as determined to be necessary by the Board. Establish Additional Advisory Boards A National Content Advisory Board will be established to review and provide advice on all content developed by the Project. Members of the Board will be expected to publish articles in professional journals and other research related to K-12 philanthropy education in support of the Project. A State Coalition Advisory Board will be established once the Project’s state-based support system is in place. Members of the Board will be selected from members of the state coalitions participating in the Project. A system will be adopted to assure that all states have a voice on this Board and that membership rotates among participating states. The Board will advise the Project on areas of mutual concern and serve as a communications path between the state-based organizations and the national Project. Identify National Project Management All normal management and Project executive responsibilities for the Project will reside with a National Executive Director who will be selected by and directly accountable to the Board of Directors. The Director will be empowered to create the national staff necessary to accomplish the Project’s objectives consistent with budgets approved in advance by the Board. Learning To Give will utilize the substantial foundation created by the K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project. From this existing infrastructure the Project it will expand its operating base in 4 distinct areas consistent with available resources: 1. Management and Operations, �-42. Curriculum Development, Testing and Assessment, 3. Regional - State Project Dissemination, and 4. Promotion, Development and Professional Training. Management and Operation Plan National leadership for Learning To Give will be drawn from the experienced staff brought together to execute the Education in Philanthropy Project. That core staff will be expanded in several key skill areas to bring additional operating expertise into the Project. This core staff, structured to be operational effective and financially efficient, will be expected to utilize a wide circle of sustaining advisors, consultants and subject matter experts to guide and direct the “national” execution of the Project. The following chart presents the proposed Functional Organization for the national Project. Funded By Learning to Give Funded By State Coalitions Organizational development will proceed according to a Project Timeline from 2001 to 2005 and will be designed to:       Complete the development, testing and assessment of the courseware needed to support an entire K-12 curriculum, Establish a validated procedure for revising and refreshing these materials using outside experts and feedback from those using the materials in the field, Optimize the use of the internet as the preferred method of distributing content, class materials and other Project information to 3 distinct audiences: students, parents, and educators, Develop and support a national project dissemination strategy through a regional office structure that will stimulate and support state-based Project Coalitions, Support the professional growth of educational professionals actively teaching Learning To Give principles in any environment, and Build national awareness of and support for the concept of teaching the principles of philanthropy giving, serving and taking personal action for the common good. The Project expects to make extraordinary use of new internet-based communications tools to make Project materials available to the widest audiences possible. Project Web sites will be  Curriculum Development, and  Testing and Assessment Plan. The Project will build upon the “value added” approach to philanthropy education established by K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project. This approach infuses the existing school curriculums with philanthropic enhancements, thereby eliminating the need for teachers to materially change their existing lesson plans. �-5Content creation takes place in several stages:  First, intellectual content needed for the Project will be drawn from academic work in progress at graduate schools throughout the country. As the Project scales up to the national level, it will foster strategic relationships with key universities working in the fields needed by the Project. These relationships will be essential as an ongoing source of academically sound history, economics, political science, and geography content related to philanthropy education.  Second, operating within stringent protocols, Project teacher panels will translate the academic content to age appropriate K-12 lessons and plans. Lessons will continue to be added to the pool of resources by teachers in professional development institutes, by summer writers, and consultant writers.  Additionally, teaching support material will continue to be written, such as briefing papers on key ideas, people, and organizations. The Project will acquire all existing materials from the earlier project and expand that work into a complete curriculum and supporting materials. Over 750 lessons have been written or are in various stages of development. Each completed lesson meets state educational requirements. Every existing lesson has been reviewed by an independent Fairness Committee and has been field-tested by at least 5 teachers who have taught the lesson who submit a written evaluation of it to the Project. The Project will continue the practice of creating quality assurance protocols to govern all content development and learning outcomes. Project Dissemination Plan The project will develop an activist, multi-front plan to promote and disseminate the Project to all potential interest groups. Specifically, the Project will:    Create a nationwide network of regional offices supporting state-based coalitions in all 50 states and the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and the Virgin Islands, Exploit the Internet and the world wide web as communication and information dissemination tools to maximize the reach and economic efficiency of the Project, and Develop substantial outreach and communications programs to broaden the interest in philanthropy education to interested public service organizations and others. Regional Offices Simultaneous with the completion of the curriculum the Project will move to establish a nationwide outreach and support infrastructure to disseminate the Project throughout the country. National dissemination will be organized around ten regions, each led by a Regional Director and managed at the national level by a National Dissemination Director reporting to the Project Executive Director. �-6The role of regional directors is to stimulate and organize leadership coalitions in states in their regions. They will also be responsible for coordinating the efforts of the states and regions into the national program and providing state organizations with technical assistance. Each Regional Office will be funded with Learning To Give resources. Each state coalition (grouped in 5-6 states to make a region) will be locally funded and responsible for leading and funding the integration of the curriculum into classrooms in their respective states. Learning To Give national and regional resources will be focused on supporting these state organizations. Internet Portals The Project will expand the existing K-12 Web-site so that it can serve as a comprehensive resource for all audiences interested in the creation and uses of philanthropy education content and collateral materials. While curriculum materials are being developed within the framework of contributing to a formal K-12 Educational system, they are applicable to many other environments. They can be equally valuable to youth groups, churches, families, and the service organizations. Project Web sites will be designed to optimize access to the whole body of materials created by the Project by all interested parties. The Web site will contain five sets of directions for specific constituency groups to use in leading the development of a philanthropy education coalition in their state including a nonprofit guidebook, a corporate guidebook, a foundation guidebook, a university guidebook, and an educational organization guidebook. When completed, the Learning To Give portal will host three interactive Web sites that will distribute philanthropic educational content to teachers, students and parents and create online environments where a national dialogue about individual philanthropy can take place. Additional Dissemination Strategies To complement regional efforts and the Web site the Project will execute a broad publication and outreach plan designed to bring information about the project to the widest possible audience. The Project will:     Publish and distribute newsletters to key educational, philanthropic audiences, and the general media, Publish collateral materials that support the philanthropy curriculum and spread interest in the project, such as posters, bookmarks, tablemats, and pictures for student drawings. Deliver conference workshops at strategic national conferences related to philanthropy and education Continue the Philanthropy Education Network launched by the K-12 Project to develop a professional identity among the teachers active in the field. In addition, the Project will assist interested parties mobilize “on the ground” resources to support the Project’s mission at the grassroots level. The project will help organize and consult with state and community- based coalitions (comprised of organizations such as service clubs like Rotary International), universities, philanthropy groups, state associations, teachers and others) who wish to be involved with the Project. The Objective of this dissemination model is to combine the depth and commitment of a flexible state and community- based implementation model (thus creating local demand among vested parties) with the �-7unparalleled power of the Web and collateral technologies (to meet demand using the most cost-efficient and effective delivery systems currently available). Promotion, Development and Professional Training The success of the Project will depend on the success of its efforts to raise awareness about the need to renew American interest in personal philanthropy and develop support for that effort throughout the country. To achieve this goal the Project will undertake a significant promotion campaign to bring the Learning To Give Project to the attention of many critical constituencies. That campaign will include a national promotion campaign to build awareness of the program among the general public, a campaign to attract interest in participating in the Project among local, regional and nation organizations, and a program for developing continuing profession interest in the Project among classroom teachers. These efforts will be supported by an active campaign to print and distribute as widely as possible the materials created by the Project and to leverage the Internet as a content distribution medium. The Financial Plan All funds raised in support of the Project will be applied to the general operating expenses consistent with operating budgets adopted by the Project’s Board of Directors. For planning and budgeting purposes the Project has established a “preliminary operating budget” that reflects the operating plan outlined above. Exact details of final spending plans will depend on the priorities set by the Board in the Project’s Adopted Operating Budgets. Summary Budget Salaries & Benefits Technical Support State Coalition Development Web and Internet Publications & Promotion Test Development/Assessment Rent & Office Logistics Pilot Program Other, Miscellaneous Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Total $1,620,000 216,000 397,000 368,000 265,000 185,000 195,000 130,000 170,000 $3,540,000 $1,790,000 225,000 550,000 300,000 275,000 240,000 200,000 135,000 342,000 $4,056,000 $2,075,000 235,000 555,000 280,000 75,000 140,000 210,000 140,000 325,000 $4,021,000 $5,485,000 676,000 1,502,000 948,000 615,000 565,000 605,000 405,000 831,000 $11,620,000 �-8Regional Office/State Coalition Schedule 2001 Region V Michigan Minnesota Ohio Illinois Indiana Wisconsin Region IX California Nevada Arizona Hawaii Region VI New Mexico Oklahoma Texas Arkansas Louisiana 2002 Region X Washington Oregon Idaho Alaska Region I Connecticut New Hampshire Maine Rhode Island Massachusetts Vermont 2003 Region II New York New Jersey Puerto Rico Virgin Islands Region III Pennsylvania West Virginia Maryland Delaware Dist. of Columbia Region IV 2004 2005 Mississippi Georgia Kentucky Florida Tennessee Alabama N. Carolina S. Carolina Region VII Nebraska Kansas Iowa Missouri Region VII Montana North Dakota South Dakota Wyoming Utah Colorado �-9- MaineStream Media 419 North Lincoln Street Arlington, Virginia 22201 E-mail - ltl@MaineStreamMedia.com C-Phone - 703.597.6946 Fax - 703.528.4941 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG-SP_2000-11-07_Sponsor-Proposed-National-Rollout Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give 2000-11-07 sponsor proposed national rollout Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give 2000-11-07 sponsor proposed national rollout. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49474 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2000-11-07 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/f11fad9bcd9c5628fd840019af08227f.pdf 09a08e4513dce79e8ab6a42bcad565ba PDF Text Text Date: To: Learning to Give Steering Committee From: Kathy Agard, Executive Director Re: News Enclosed are two items that we thought you might find interesting. The first is a front page, “People Section”, report on the project from the Lakeshore Edition of the Grand Rapids Press. The reporter did a nice job of capturing the project. The second is a thank-you letter from one of our teachers, Kathy Veenstra, who won our new lesson plan competition. During the next month a new Search Engine will be on the web-site. It will allow a visitor to search by academic topic (history, economics etc), grade level, key word, Michigan standard and benchmark, or philanthropy strand. We will have the prototype for our teacher meeting on Saturday, January 13, 2001. The search engine should be on the site shortly thereafter. In addition, we will soon have the first set of Foundation Profiles in the Resource Room. These are short vignettes on the founders of private foundations. They include a picture, a short history, a quote or two, and then link to the foundations’ website. We will continue to build this resource as the foundations provide us with their stories, pictures, and permission to use the materials. In early February a monograph written for Family Foundations, based on the lessons and selected resource materials, if being published by CMF. We look forward to sending you a copy. Best wishes as we enter this new year! � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG-SC_Memo Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give steering committee memo Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give steering committee memo. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49473 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/cc666c3c69e0346b18c295c33d56fed6.pdf d06f07b69599d9d85cfd9564cf80ec4d PDF Text Text Learning to Give Steering Committee Dr. Russell G. Mawby, Chairman Chairman Emeritus W.K. Kellogg Foundaion Ms. Barbara J. Getz Executive Director The Gerber Foundation Dr. Valerie A. Becker Senior Manager, National Education Programs DaimlerChrysler Corporation Committee Chair, Mich. Chamber of Commerce Mich. Business Leaders for Educ. Excellence Ms. Elizabeth Gibbs Community Service Coordinator Lahser/Andover High School Dr. Dwight F. Burlingame Associate Executive Director Center on Philanthropy Indiana University Ms. JoMarie Goerge Program Associate The Fetzer Institute Dr. Anne L. Hansen Education Consultant Mr. Kyle Caldwell Executive Director Michigan Community Service Commission George W. Romney Building, 4th Floor Ms. Dorothy A. Johnson President Alhburg Company President-Emerius, Council of Michigan Foundations Mr. C. David Campbell President McGregor Fund Mr. James A. Kelly Educational Consultant Former President National Board for Professional Teaching Standards Mr. Robert S. Collier President Council of Michigan Foundations Ms. Julie F. Cummings Trustee Max M. and Marjorie S. Fisher Foundation Ms. Adrian Davis Executive Associate, Assessment Development National Board for Professional Teaching Standards President-elect National Council for Social Studies Mr. Thomas Dolan Curriculum Director Romulus Community Schools Mr. David O. Egner President Hudson-Webber Foundation Ms. Susan Kelly Director-Public Affairs Hudson's Mr. John S. Lore Volunteer Former President National Society of Fund-Raising Executives Mr. Ken Mareski Instructor East China Schools Representative Michigan Council for Social Studies Dr. Susan Meston Deputy Superintendent Muskegon Area Intermediate School District Dr. Joel J. Orosz Program Director W.K. Kellogg Foundation �Learning to Give Steering Committee Ms. Linda B. Patterson Executive Director Dyer-Ives Foundation Dr. John W. Porter President Urban Education Alliance, Inc. Trustee, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Ms. Sheila Potter English/Language Arts Consultant Michigan Department of Education Ms. Stella Raudenbush Director, K-12 Service Learning Center Educational Studies Department University of Michigan Staff: Dr. Kathryn A. Agard Executive Director Ms. Barbara Dillbeck Teacher-in-Residence Ms. Rita Higgins Marketing and Public Relations Director Ms. Judy Wright Executive Secretary Mr. Jim Sandy Director, Education Excellence Program Michigan Chamber of Commerce Mr. Sam Singh President Michigan Nonprofit Association Ms. Kathleen Straus Chair, State Board of Education Michigan Department of Education Ms. Karen R. Todorov Social Studies Consultant Michigan Department of Education Ms. Susan Wally Vice President of Education Ewing Marion Kauffman Foundation � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG-SC_Members Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give steering committee members Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give steering committee members. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49472 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/58ced021fe5d6d1934691423358910ab.pdf 92d6dbb88c0507dbe5f1f050bae03cbc PDF Text Text LTG_Proposed Reach Worksheets New Teachers Trained through Institutes Cumulative Numbers of Teachers Trained Teachers Reached through In-service Workshops New Teachers Trained Online Cumulative Number of Teachers Trained Online Total Teachers Involved 450 450 13,500 1,500 1,500 17,400 2001 Number of States Total Teachers Involved Elementary Students Secondary Students Total Students Reached in Classrooms Parents Reached Nationwide 15 17,400 261,000 1,305,000 1,566,000 750 1,200 36,000 2,500 4,000 44,450 1,020 3,220 96,600 3,400 7,400 111,640 2002 2,003 10 9 44,450 111,640 666,750 1,674,600 3,333,750 8,373,000 4,000,500 10,047,600 1,260 3,480 104,400 4,200 11,600 124,940 1,560 5,040 151,200 5,200 16,800 179,800 2,004 2,005 8 10 124,940 178,396 1,874,100 2,675,940 9,370,500 13,379,700 11,244,600 16,055,640 3132000 8001000 20095200 22489200 Audience 2001 States and Territories 15 Potential State Market Total Teachers Involved 17,400 Potential Teacher Market Total Students Reached Nationwide 1,566,000 Potential Student Market in States for that year 21,428,000 Potential Parent Market in States Reached for that year 43,000,000 Total Parents Reached Nationwide 3,132,000 Total 4,715,400 2002 10 2003 9 2004 8 44,450 111,640 124,940 4,000,500 4,105,000 8,000,000 8,001,000 12,045,950 10,047,600 7,246,000 14,000,000 20,095,200 30,254,440 32111280 5,040 13,390 401,700 16,800 41,300 478,230 Total 52 476,826 7,152,390 35,761,950 42,914,340 85828680 2005 Total 10 178,396 52 52 478,230 Percent Reached 100% 17% 3,178,000 11,244,500 16,055,640 42,914,340 9,460,000 3,842,000 46,081,000 19,000,000 7,000,000 92,000,000 22,489,200 32,111,280 85,828,680 33,858,640 48,345,316 129,221,250 93% 93% Estimates based on the proposed plan as rolling-out in phases. The total numbers would be reached in the first two years with sufficient funding. The number of teachers by state his not readily available. The estimates include public schools only. Private schools and home schooled numbers of teachers and children will expand the potential market. December 1 of 2 �LTG_Proposed Reach Worksheets The numbers do not include Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, or Washington DC. The market is larger than indicated as a result. Parents are roughly estimated as two parents per child. This number would be modified because more than one school-aged child would be in a family, but is also modified by the fact that many children only have one parent involved in their schooling. Number of Teachers Involved Number of States New Teachers Trained through Institutes Cumulative Numbers of Teachers Trained Teachers Reached through In-service Workshops New Teachers Trained Online Cumulative Number of Teachers Trained Online Total Teachers Involved 2001 15 450 450 13,500 1,500 1,500 17,400 2002 10 750 1,200 36,000 2,500 4,000 44,450 2003 9 1,020 3,220 96,600 3,400 7,400 111,640 2004 8 1,260 3,480 104,400 4,200 11,600 124,940 2005 Total 10 52 1,560 5,040 5,040 13,390 151,200 401,700 5,200 16,800 16,800 41,300 178,396 478,230 Teachers Trained Through Institutes Institutes are face-to-face three day professional development experiences that orient classroom teachers to the teaching of giving and serving. These graduates then become “Teacher Consultants” in their state. Cumulative Teachers Trained Each year new teachers are added to the teacher pool and the teachers who are already Teacher-Consultants remain involved through the Philanthropy Education Network. In-service Workshop Each Teacher-Consultant commits to providing at least two in-service experiences for other teachers. For the purpose of example, it is assumed that 30 teachers per state per year will go through the professional institute and that each of the graduates will provide two further in-service experiences with 15 teachers in each in-service. Online Education The institutes will be translated to an online environment for teachers nationwide to have access to an online tutorial regarding using the lessons. Continuing education and graduate education credits will be sought for this online training. It is estimated that a minimum of 100 teachers per state per year will be involved in online education. December 2 of 2 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG-RCH_Proposed-Reach-Worksheets Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give proposed Reach worksheets Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give proposed Reach worksheets. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49471 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/641eb686ab9a90edc0c5402b9e3b682f.pdf 23e775e69192ab7049f9f533b77a9500 PDF Text Text LTG_Proposed Reach Estimates Reach Assumptions Partner Organizations Member Member Total Multiplier Total Annual Monthly Organizations Individuals Individuals Multiplier Conference Newsletter Independent Sector 800 100 8,000 1,000 8,000,000 950 YES Association of Fund-Raising Professionals 154 20,000 20,000 200 4,000,000 1,000 YES United Way of America 1,900 100 190,000 50 9,500,000 1,000 YES National Council of Nonprofit Associations 39 20,000 200,000 50 10,000,000 500 NO Council on Foundations 1,000 50 50,000 10 500,000 2,500 YES National Education Association 13,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 YES February 2001 National or Regional Systems Consortium of Systems Individuals Serving Organizations National System State Coalitions of Organizations National/Regional Organizations National Organization of Individuals Page 1 of 1 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG-RCH_2001-02_Proposed-Reach-Estimates Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give 2001-02 proposed Reach estimates Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give 2001-02 proposed Reach estimates. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49470 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2001-02 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/a3701bae14ba3e267866fe24392a070d.pdf 27d79f44c0947efe00bb9d0911a186d7 PDF Text Text Background Data Education Week January 2000 Estimated Reach of the Project These are direct reach estimates and the number do not include the casual use access to the materials available on the web-site. Audience States and Territories Potential State Market Total Teachers Involved Potential Teacher Market Total Students Reached Nationwide Potential Student Market in States for that year Potential Parent Market in States Reached for that year Total Parents Reached Nationwide Total 2001 2002 15 2003 2004 10 9 2005 8 Total 52 10 Percent Reached 100% 52 17,400 44,450 111,640 124,940 478,230 178,396 17% 3,178,000 1,566,000 4,000,500 10,047,600 11,244,500 16,055,640 42,914,340 21,428,000 4,105,000 7,246,000 9,460,000 3,842,000 46,081,000 43,000,000 8,000,000 14,000,000 19,000,000 7,000,000 92,000,000 3,132,000 8,001,000 20,095,200 22,489,200 32,111,280 85,828,680 4,715,400 12,045,950 30,254,440 33,858,640 48,345,316 129,221,250 Estimates based on the proposed plan as rolling-out in phases. The total numbers would be reached in the first two years with sufficient funding. The number of teachers by state his not readily available. The estimates include public schools only. Private schools and home schooled numbers of teachers and children will expand the potential market. The numbers do not include Puerto Rico, Virgin Islands, or Washington DC. The market is larger than indicated as a result. Parents are roughly estimated as two parents per child. This number would be modified because more than one school-aged child would be in a family, but is also modified by the fact that many children only have one parent involved in their schooling. Number of Teachers Involved 2001 2002 Number of States 15 10 2003 2004 9 2005 8 Total 10 52 93% 93% �New Teachers Trained through Institutes Cumulative Numbers of Teachers Trained Teachers Reached through In-service Workshops New Teachers Trained Online Cumulative Number of Teachers Trained Online Total Teachers Involved 450 750 1,020 1,260 1,560 5,040 450 1,200 3,220 3,480 5,040 13,390 13,500 36,000 96,600 104,400 151,200 401,700 1,500 2,500 3,400 4,200 5,200 16,800 1,500 4,000 7,400 11,600 16,800 41,300 17,400 44,450 111,640 124,940 178,396 478,230 Teachers Trained Through Institutes Institutes are face-to-face three day professional development experiences that orient classroom teachers to the teaching of giving and serving. These graduates then become “Teacher Consultants” in their state. Cumulative Teachers Trained Each year new teachers are added to the teacher pool and the teachers who are already Teacher-Consultants remain involved through the Philanthropy Education Network. In-service Workshop Each Teacher-Consultant commits to providing at least two in-service experiences for other teachers. For the purpose of example, it is assumed that 30 teachers per state per year will go through the professional institute and that each of the graduates will provide two further in-service experiences with 15 teachers in each in-service. Online Education The institutes will be translated to an online environment for teachers nationwide to have access to an online tutorial regarding using the lessons. Continuing education and graduate education credits will be sought for this online training. It is estimated that a minimum of 100 teachers per state per year will be involved in online education. Cumulative Number of Teachers Trained Online Each year new teachers are added to the teacher pool and the teachers who are already Teacher-Consultants remain involved through the Philanthropy Education Network. Student Reach 2001 Number of States Total Teachers Involved Elementary Students Secondary Students Total Students Reached in 2002 2003 2004 2005 Total 15 17,400 10 44,450 9 111,640 8 124,940 10 178,396 52 476,826 261,000 666,750 1,674,600 1,874,100 2,675,940 7,152,390 1,305,000 3,333,750 8,373,000 9,370,500 13,379,700 35,761,950 1,566,000 4,000,500 10,047,600 11,244,500 16,055,640 42,914,340 �Classrooms For the sake of projection, it is estimated that half of the teachers would be in K-5 environments reaching 30 children each year in their classroom. Half of the teachers would be in grades 6-8 environments where children move from classroom to classroom. A secondary teacher would reach approximately 150 children per year. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG-RCH_2000-12_Proposed-Reach-Estimates Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give 2000-12 proposed Reach estimates Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give 2000-12 proposed Reach estimates. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49469 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2000-12 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/185d37d01fc2d42c91878d24a8537459.pdf 0c791f4d3a992067d98c2f5a5388f167 PDF Text Text Diane, Executive Summary-Overview We would like the Executive Summary as it is without any additional charts. The fact that the report is separately bound from MSU helps us a lot with our funding, and it is well written as is. If we could have 100 copies that would be great (if this is more than you are funded for….let me know and we will pick up the additional cost). If you are comfortable, I would love to report the data on outcomes as either a separate component or an addendum to this report. It is the one we will use to new funders. Full Report 2-4 pages of outcomes (attached) Indiana’s report (we do not have electronically, I will ask Judy to retype and send it to you via e-mail as an attachment) Susan’s abstract (I will ask her to send) In the full report, if Brian could review some of the charts to report out the top two responses rather than just the top one response….that should dramatically change the perception from the casual reader re: the effectiveness of the Project without massaging the data too much. If, as a researcher, he would like to keep the single response reports….that would be ok as long as the follow-up charts are added showing the top two responses. (If this doesn’t make sense…give me a call). Quantity 100 Overviews 50 Full Reports Thanks. �K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project Council of Michigan Foundations Report on Outcomes 1997-2000 Curriculum Development 1997 Identified student learning outcomes None in philanthropy by grade level Developed and edited four strands Developed and edited nineteen standards Developed and edited 107 benchmarks per grade level (321 total) Created framework for K-12 philanthropy education K-12 Lessons and Units Teaching None the Philanthropy Benchmarks 120 lessons K-12 completed and online 90 lessons in final edit 300-500 in draft form Created lesson template including service-learning component and parent involvement components Reorganized MDE social studies benchmarks for State Pool of field-test teachers evaluating None philanthropy lessons K-12 900 teachers in 36 states evaluating lessons 120,000-140,000 students exposed to a lesson in their classroom Lexicon of Key Terms in Curriculum Initial draft completed None Briefing Papers on Concepts, People and Organizations Eighteen papers published 100 papers in progress Created template for briefing papers None Standardized Tests on Philanthropy Initial test format framed Test questions drafted None �Teacher Professional Development K-12 Teachers in Philanthropy None 120 K-12 Teachers trained as philanthropy Teacher-Consultants Teacher in-service training in None philanthropy education 1999 Summer institute CMU 2000 Summer institute CMU 2000 Summer institute Kansas City 2000 Summer institute Berrien County, Michigan Secured graduate credit CMU and U of Missouri Secured continuing ed. credit from MDE Created and tested teacher professional development curriculum Identified and secured faculty Created and published teacher professional development materials Classroom Support and Original Teaching Materials History/Philanthropy Timelines U.S. History Michigan History World History Almost None Annotated bibliography of children’s literature by grade level Calendar of philanthropic events during the year Bookmarks of philanthropists New book for Family Foundations that uses the curriculum Three original songs on philanthropy for students “Student Service in Philanthropy Project” curriculum donated to the site Arizona Community Foundation middle school curriculum donated to the site Philanthropic quotations Speeches and Interviews Specifically for the Project John Gardner-Why Teach Philanthropy in Schools Bill Richardson-Teaching Philanthropy Curt Meadows-The Philanthropic Tradition �Multiple links to related web-sites High school textbook, CD-Rom, web-site material under development: including a teacher guide, student guide, and parent guide Other Resources Original research on parent involvement initiatives completed and due to be published Baseline research on the status of service-learning in Michigan being completed � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG-EVAL_2000-2003_Report-on-Outcomes-Data-for-Final-Report Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give 2000-2003 report on outcomes data Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give 2000-2003 report on outcomes data. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49468 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2000/2003 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/379365c42152618890901f30adc6368b.pdf d6bb7d99eee955d98cf15d020c65c19a PDF Text Text K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project Evaluation Report: Journals Round 5 Spring 2000 Mark Wilson, Ph.D. Michigan State University The K-12 Education in Philanthropy Project engages teachers from across the state in the development of educational programs and materials. As part of the evaluation process we ask teachers periodically to write about their experiences. The aim of the journals is twofold, first, to capture feedback from teachers about the process and content of their work, and second, to provide an opportunity for participants to reflect on the progress of the project. The journals provide a chronicle for us to understand the progress of the project, as well as to identify the factors important to its success. Round 5 asks 4 questions, all seeking written comments. In addition, Round 5 surveyed existing and joining teachers, with two similar questions directed to each group and remaining questions targeted to the experiences of the Matrix and Summer teachers. Responses came from 24 Matrix teachers and 10 Summer teachers. The questions and a summary of responses are detailed in this report. Q1. In your students do you see any evidence of their understanding or actions resulting from the philanthropy elements of the curriculum? This question was directed to both groups of teachers, with little difference between the responses. Not surprisingly, the Matrix teachers had implemented their lessons over a longer period and reported more examples. Teachers report students being interested, excited and engaged by the lessons on philanthropy. Students are more aware of themselves and their communities, and their ability to make a contribution to making their schools and neighborhoods better. Overall, the evidence cited can be listed in several categories. First, students recognize and use the terms associated with philanthropy, with comments from teachers such as; “They understand and use (philanthropy) correctly. They use it appropriately and apply it to subject areas other than the one they learned it in.” “Frequently, I hear my students cry out ‘That’s philanthropy’, during the reading of a piece of literature or an event in history. What pleases me is that I never ‘set up’ these responses. The students recognize philanthropy quite naturally now.” 1 �“Students are using the term philanthropy. Students understand actions that are philanthropic.” “The students are quick to identify examples of philanthropic activity, their own and others. Some students can identify philanthropy (without prompts) in a historical context.” “Students are relating philanthropy (and service learning) to units on economics and geography. It has become almost routine for many of my students to look for solutions when confronted with problems.” “They can point to it on the playground, in the classroom, and at home.” “..students used the word philanthropy in their writing for the MEAP.” A second set of achievements relate to students putting philanthropy into action in their schools and communities: “My students are actively involved with helping others through fundraising, donating their time and talent, tutoring, picking up trash, sweeping floors etc.” “This term 3 students lost their homes to fire but were still willing to help others by raising dollars for the March of Dimes. They stated that they felt they should still help because other groups, like the Red Cross, were helping them right now.” “The students are invariably finding their own ways to implement philanthropy in their daily lives.” “There has been an explosion of volunteer activity in the school – many factors are probably involved – but the lessons on philanthropy are definitely one factor.” The third set of factors is broader, associated with students’ own personal development and the way that understanding philanthropy has shaped personal growth. For example: “I have students doing very poorly at the middle school level but who are attending regularly so they will be able to ‘tutor’ their kids and help them.” “They show a caring attitude – desire to please but also do actions to support others when we do a philanthropy unit. They quickly forget kind acts unless repeat lessons are used.” “Students have learned valuable lessons of life from these lessons.” 2 �“Students are more aware of opportunities to volunteer and also seem to understand the importance of volunteerism and philanthropy to our society.” “Students have become involved in YAC – community foundation work. Students have given much to their community.” “Respect, caring for one another, sharing concern for others’ safety, happiness, and general well-being.” Q2a What stand out as the major lessons learned from the project? (Curriculum development, computers, philanthropy . . ) The Matrix teachers were asked this question to sum up their overall experience in the project. Many note that the entire project was significant for many reasons, with the following quotes capturing common themes: “The whole process was fascinating to watch as it developed – the group forming and working hard towards a common goal – the struggle to learn how to use a computer, develop curriculum and assessment – a very valuable personal and professional experience.” “As an educator I have learned so much from the others I have worked with. The diversity of this group and what it has accomplished underscores the importance of honoring and valuing a broad diverse population. It is a group rich in talent, expertise and commitment to a very worthwhile project.” The responses can be classified into four groups. First, teachers identify their knowledge of philanthropy as the major lesson from the Project. “The definition of philanthropy – a deeper understanding of what it is.” “I have gained a better understanding of how important philanthropy has always been in my life. I have never identified quite in the same way before.” “A greater understanding of the nonprofit sector. Namely that it is a viable career option.” “Philanthropy has been the medium, therefore much has been learned about philanthropy.” Second, the knowledge of computers remains a significant lesson for teachers. After the trials of learning and using computers and the Internet, the technology is now recognized as an important element of their learning: “Learning to use the computer as a user friendly tool.” 3 �“Computers, definitely! I never would have gotten ‘comfortable’ with them otherwise (I’m really not comfy enough yet!). “Computers, computer, computer. I had no knowledge of the computer. Now I am doing much better at locating valuable information. I wish I had more time to explore.” “Computer knowledge – great progress made from illiterate to functional.” “Computers – I was forced to step out of my box.” “There was no way I could have learned the bare basic computer skills I now have (without) being assisted in getting my lessons into this format.” The third set of lessons stems from the process of developing the curriculum, and the professional development that was integral to the design and implementation of the project. In addition to the lessons on philanthropy, many teachers valued highly their ability to understand and develop curriculum and assessment tools. Comments included: “I have learned to analyze and understand lesson plans 9especially paying attention to cultural fairness). I have also learned a lot about assessment (how to write fair questions and organize a ‘standardized’ assessment.)” “Curriculum development. They teach us in undergrad but when do we ever use it? This was a great applied teaching tool!” “I have gained a better understanding of working on and developing curriculum.” “It caused me to reevaluate what others were marketing. I now adapt lessons rather than taking them at face value.” Q2b Looking back, how do you assess the Summer Institute? Do you have any recommendations to make for organization or content of future Institutes? This question was directed to the Summer teachers to learn of their experience with the Summer Institute several months after its completion. Teacher comments are divided into two groups, overall assessment, and recommendations for the next institute. In general, all experiences seem to have been very positive and supportive of the program, with comments such as: “It was very complete and first class all the way.” “For me it was a fabulous experience. Well organized and well planned.” 4 �“Philanthropy – I was basically clueless when we started this. Now I know a lot, and so do my students.” “Outstanding – it was an inspiring professional experience providing great learning and collaborative opportunities.” “Excellent!” “I learned an awful lot at the Institute.” In terms of the next seminar there were several suggestions made, usually concerning having more time for assignments and collaboration. Recommendations include: “Time to work together to clean up lesson plans and ideas.” “I would have liked more information/preview about my role as a lesson plan writer. Had I brought resource/teaching materials with me, I feel I would have been more productive and efficient.” “We may need to spend a little more time on presentation technique for nonexperienced presenters.” “I wish there was more time during the Institute to develop all of the lessons and units. Too much left undone.” “Hold back a little content. One day’s worth was overwhelming .. . the week’s worth became hard to manage.” “Your way of doing things is incredible, but there’s no-one to even ask for help near me.” “I think an (optional0 session on grant writing would be helpful.” Q3. Do you use the Listserv? How could it be more useful for you? The Listserv does not seem to receive a lot of attention from teachers or to be a significant part of the project’s infrastructure. This question was directed to both groups of teachers. Of the Summer teachers, more than half do not use the system. Several noted that they did not know how to use it, while others said they did not have the time to access the Internet. For the Summer teachers, only several made recommendations and comments, suggesting that it will be used more when lessons are implemented, and that it may be necessary to promote its use. The Matrix teachers used the Listserv more often, but again the sense was that it was not a central resource. There seemed to be some confusion in responses, seeing the Listserv as the same as e-mail. 5 �Those who used the Listserv found it valuable when collaborating on lessons or projects, and note that it is an efficient way to communicate: “I have used it during the time we were meeting once a month on curriculum and assessment.” “The Listserv is great – I could no longer go back to mail or fax. E-mail is the most efficient use of communication, and Listserv is an even more efficient use of my time.” “I use it to reply to other members, but do not readily send information to all participants.” “Yes – it saves lots of time.” The lack of use seems to stem from uncertainty about how the system works and what it should be used for. While not stated by teachers, the reticence about Listservs may be associated with the general need for comfort with computers discovered during the first stage of the project. Comments about use/non-use of listserv include: “Originally I used it often, but that was before others understood the concept. Many still do not understand the value of communicating ideas and asking questions on a Listserv. I think the idea was foreign for the majority of project members. It would become useful only if more people used it.” “I do not use except for receiving incoming e-mail messages.” “I would use the Listserv if I had more examples of appropriate uses for it. Currently, it seems like the most I know about it is that it shouldn’t be abused.” “As people get their own e-mail address it may be easier to communicate as it was hard to get through to MSU.” “I have used it rarely because I am still not sure of the advantages.” “It is difficult for me to get online during normal hours.” The comments on use of the Listserv suggests that it is not well understood as a system, and that time may be needed at project meetings to discuss how and when to use the Listserv. A second issue may be problems getting online or not being a regular e-mail user. The value of e-mail, in particular, depends upon a critical mass of any organization being regular users. That way, when messages are sent out the, senders know that their colleagues will see their message. Also, Listserv users will know to check their e-mail as it is likely that they will have mail. If a Listserv is used sporadically, it does not appear to be a current or useful resource. 6 �Specific recommendations for the Listserv are to break it down to more specific, easily defined subsets of the Project. This would increase the relevance of traffic and emphasize the value of the system: “Update list and curriculum appropriate age levels – geographic.” “Could it be broken down by grade levels, geographic areas etc?” Q4a In the coming year, what are your plans for continuing philanthropy education in your school? Without exception, every teacher noted that they plan to continue teaching about philanthropy and continuing to be active supporters of the projects mission. Many also state that they will go beyond the teaching of the prepared lessons, to develop further materials and to extend the work that they started under the project. Among the plans for the coming year are: “I hope to continue with the service learning project with the curriculum. We have multi-age ‘angel groups’ that meet once a month in our school. We meet with a project to do monthly … for a local soup kitchen.” “I believe in the project and the value of teaching philanthropy. I will continue to incorporate my lessons in the curriculum.’ “I will continue finding pieces that will add to and enrich what I have already started.” “It has become the theme of our grade level and I have the support of the team of teachers I work with.” “I want all students to be lifelong philanthropists. I will teach, show, give, help from the heart and hope my students will role model after me.” “Continue teaching students about philanthropy and providing opportunities for practice.” “The lessons will be incorporated into 3 required classes at the high school; government, American history, and integrated social studies.” Q4b What form of meeting works best for you? How often would you like to meet as a group in the coming year? This question was directed to the Summer teachers. The responses suggest that 2-3 meeting per year would be best, with several suggesting a meeting each semester with one meeting in the Summer. In general, the Saturday meetings seem to be working, with no-one saying it was not a good choice of meeting day. One teacher suggested that a computer lab be one of the elements of the meetings to improve computer skills and to offer one on one instruction. 7 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF-LTG-EVAL_2000-2003_Journals-Round-5-Evaluation-Report Title A name given to the resource Learning to Give 2000-2003 journals round 5 evaluation report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Learning to Give Description An account of the resource Learning to Give 2000-2003 journals round 5 evaluation report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Records Fundraising Council of Michigan Foundations Learning to Give Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49467 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2000/2003