626 24 26018 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/6a98297010e33a412f8bda07c218909f.pdf 4c64b9835683dc46fad4e0dd4f48ee7c PDF Text Text CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Date: February 13, 2009 Memo to: Melonie Colaianne, Chairperson, and Members of the Board ofTrustees From: Phil Peters, Chair, CMF Audit Committee Dave L indberg, Vice President Finance RE: CMF 12-31-08 Internal Financial Statements Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve the CMF and Supporting Organizations Internal Financial Statements for December 31, 2008 as recommended by the CMF Audit Committee. On February 9, 2009, the CMF Audit Committee met and approved the attached financial report. Core Operations Note 1: Membership The proj ected amount includes the following anticipated payments. Steelcase Foundation Conway Family Foundation The Tiscomia Foundation Harry A. & Margaret D. Towsley Foundation $9,600 500 1,100 7,200 Note 2: Additional Member Contributions The bulk of this category is the $150,000 grant from Kellogg. See attached detailed report for other contributions. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Financials 12-31-0S.doc �Note 3: Other Grants 2008-09 is the final year of a three year $25,000 per year grant from The Skillman Foundation to support the occupancy costs for the Detroit office. It appears Skillman will be providing a grant for at least one more year to support this office. Includes the following· Skillman Detroit Office Support Yr 3 (Final) Transfer Fatherhood meeting revenue to special grant dollars $25,000 (2,308) Note 4: Conference & Meetings Revenue & Expenses As of 12-31-08 the annual conference has contributed $140,000 to staff time to produce the conference vs. a budget of $123,000, which was the result of attendance being greater than anticipated. Total staff time to produce the conference is estimated at $225,000. The additional contribution is due to attendance exceeding expectations. Note 5: Investment Income While the rate of return on the money market account has dropped below 2% vs. 5% for last year, overall income has remained on budget due to the $1.3 million in ECIC money that was held through 8-15-08. With the transfer of the ECIC money it appears we may fall short of our investment earnings goal by $43,000 by year-end. $30,000 of the year to date amount is the result of the income transferred from the Core Operations Endowment Fund. Note 6: Wages The projected variance from budget is due to the following items. Director of Corporate Services - position not filled till Nov 2008 Additional time to Philanthropy 3D project Additional time on Diversity project ECIC Project ending August of 2008 S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Financials 12-31 -0S.doc $36,000 3,000 16,000 (5,800) �Note 7: Equipment & Furniture $ 1,500 of this amount is for carpet purchased for the board room. Due to the projected surplus and the fact that the President' s car lease is expiring, a replacement car (Saturn Hybrid) was purchased in late January. Due to the current auto industry crisis leasing has increased significantly so the monthly payments over a three year lease equal the purchase price of the car. Since depreciation is not a cash expense and not booked until year-end, the savings on the monthly internal financial statements is the lease cost of approx imately $700 plus any gas savings. Note 8: Communications/Publications $ 12,000 of the projected variance is due to the Board Chair publication that was funded by a grant from the C.S. Mott Foundation and distributed to members at no charge. The remaining variance is due to a couple of publications that have been put on hold. Note 9: Professional Services Line Item Newsclip Service Public Affairs Legal - Clark Hill Audit Fees Mise - Matrix Budget 2008-09 Actual 4/1/2008 12/31/2008 4,500 18,000 11,000 4,500 2,000 3,939 13,500 6,925 4,594 2,440 40,000 31,398 Projected 1/1/2009 3/31/2009 2008-09 4,500 4,000 8,500 3,939 18,000 10,925 4,594 2,440 39,898 S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Financials 12-31-0S.doc �William Allen Fund This fund supports staff travel and complimentary Foundation Directories for the annual legislative trip to Washington D.C. Because of the increase in fees charged by COF for the Hill visits ($95) in March 2009, CMF is passing along the registrations fees to the members. Russell G. Mawby Fund The following current year budgeted items have not been committed to at this point: GVSU Family Chair Establishing & Admin Scholarship Programs Corporate Giving Program State of Michigan Giving Total $18,000 5,400 5,400 9,700 $38,500 The following expenditures have been paid to date: Association Dues & Sponsorships MNA Sponsorship Super Conference Michigan Women' s Foundation - Women of Achievement Dinner National Center for Family Philanthropy Online service Association ofFundraising Professionals- National Philanthropy Day sponsorship MNA Nonprofit Day sponsorship Governor's Service Award Video ofCMF awardees $1,000 500 3,600 500 500 2,500 Professional Services MNA 2008 Economic Impact Study 50% Due Legal work L3C Legal Work Establishing a Charitable Foundation $6,328 4,262 2,599 Travel Dinner Mawby Award winner Facing Racism travel expenses $536 1,059 S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Financials 12-31-0S.doc �Ruth & Russ Mawby Fund for Kids This fund supports the YAC summer intern and the Summer Youth Conference for youth grantmakers. The final b illing from U ofM for the June 2008 Summer Youth Conference was finally received and paid in December. Dorothy Johnson Educational Fund Other Grant Due to the drop in the market value of this endowment fund and the fact that the attendance at the annual conference exceeded expectations only $39,000 of this fund was used to support the CMF Annual Conference. Community Foundation Endowment Fund At this tim e it appears total expenses should remain within budget for the current fiscal year. CFYP Endowment Fund This fund supports Y AC Program Associate position. $ 1,500 of the Training & Registration line item covered the registration fees for the youth that attended the CMF Annual Conference. Riecker Leadership Fund T he fund supports 65% the Public Policy Fellow position. William Richardson Endowment Fund 35% of the Public Policy Fellow's wages are being charged to this endowment fund. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Financials 12-31-0S.doc �Community Foundation Technology Endowment Fund This fund primarily covers the support provided to FIMS sites by Bill Nethercut, software consultant. Carl Reitz Endowment Fund This fund supports investment educational events for foundation staff and trustees at the CMF Annual Conference. CMF Core Services Endowment Fund $30,000 was transferred from this fund to CMF Core Services. This represents the 5% spendable income available from this fund on an annual basis. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Financials 12-31 -0S.doc �that the Kresge Foundation had invited a proposal for $250,000. There was agreement to proceed with the recommendation and inform the whole Board about this development. Upon motion duly made, supported, and unanimously carried, it was RESOLVED that CMF enter into a Memorandum of Agreement with the Michigan Department of Energy, Labor and Economic Growth to contract with McKinsey & Co. for up to $1 million for the Michigan' s Advanced Energy Economy Initiative for the period February 16, 2009 to May 15, 2009 with the following conditions: • at least three members of CMF participate in this collaborative with grants in excess of $500,000, • a Steering Committee with representatives from Michigan's univer sities, nonprofits, business and foundations meets at least twice a month during this period, • the State is successful in securing Federal stimulus funds to implement the goals of the Initiative, and • low income populations are involved as beneficiaries of programs of the Initiative such as job creation Attitudes and Perceptions Survey of CMF Trustees and Staff Mr. Collier reviewed the purpose of the Attitudes and Perceptions Survey as a new baseline tool tor the D iversity and Inclusion Initiative developed by the Community Research Institute at Grand Valley State University. He indicated that because of recent emails, it was apparent a number of Trustees have completed the Survey from the perspective of their Foundation and not as CMF Trustees. There was agreement that the Survey should be resent to all Trustees before the February 24 Board Meeting with a request that they complete it again from the perspective of a CMF Trustee. President's Performance Review Chairperson Colaianne reviewed the process used last year for evaluating the President. There was consensus by the Committee to continue this process. There being no further business the meeting adjourned at 2:45 p.m. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Financials 12-31-0S.doc �Council of Michigan Foundations & Supporting Organizations Consolidated Balance Sheet December 31, 2008 II CMF Core & Spec ial Projects ASSETS Cash & Equivalents Investments Grants Receivable Due From Other Funds Property, Plant & Equipment - Net Other Assets Total Assets LIABILITIES Accounts Payable Grants Liabilities Deferred/Other Liabilities Total Liabilities NET ASSETS (FUND BALANCE) Unrestricted & Temp Restrict. Endowment Funds KYIP Fund Total Net Assets Total Liabilities & Net Assets S :\Finance\Finandat Statements\08-09\CMF FS 12-31-08 $5,653,295 3,637,401 (3,334, 731) 397,783 32,487 $6,386,235 $24,700 0 84,346 109,046 Endowment Funds $193,292 12,787,968 (145,515) $12,835,745 Supporting Organizations Michigan AIDS MCFV LTG Fund $5,274 ,811 $16,377 $2,223,269 3,397,680 1,987 179,397 $8,674,478 $2,419,043 $360,887 390,795 (96,832) 6,972 8,637 $670,458 $ 0 6,277,189 20,000 64,000 84,000 0 0 3,403,004 179,738 2,239,305 586,458 Total $11,498,662 15,011,237 4,028,196 (1) 406,742 41,124 $30,985,959 $24,700 20,000 148,346 193,046 6 ,277,189 12,835,745 5,271 ,474 8,674,478 2,419,043 586,458 10,446,389 15,075,050 5,271,474 30,792,913 $6,386,235 $12,835,745 $8,674,478 $2,419,043 $670,458 $30,985,959 12,835,745 �Counc il of Mic higan Foundatio ns & Supporting Organizations Co ns olidat ed Statem ent of Activities and Changes in Net Asset s 4-1-08 to 12-31-08 II Council of Michigan Foundations Supporting Organizations Michigan A IDS MCFV LTG Fun d CMF Core Services Revenues Spendable Income Membership Investment Additiona l Member Contributions Other Grants Conference Income Publications Other Income Investment Income Total Revenues Program/Admi n Expenses Wages & Benefits Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Depreciation Technology Dues & Sponsorship Books & Subscriptions Communications!Publications Professional Services Travel Training & Seminars Conference & Meeting (GainVLoss sale of fixed assets Overhead Allocation to Spec Proj Total Program!Admin Special Endowment Funds Projects $0 $0 $722,200 982,1 09 167,060 22,692 654,421 14,698 83,694 $722,200 982, 109 167,060 1,482,795 600 200 1,924,875 CMF Total 10 1,483,405 100 23,525 1,170 22,145 !3,795,667! !3.026,527! 250,800 ~24,201 3 75,001 1,219,901 66,640 14,096 1,930 10 2,875 267,596 733 1,930 6,310 16,281 3,954 24 1 1,976 0 119 510 11 ,702 1,250 11 ,610 45,819 42,360 978 41,025 51 ,707 2,033 s 381,753 9,903 32,777 29,125 $722,200 678,546 15,868 22,345 3,711 ,963 717,247 51,066 14,574 235,058 1,000 3,460 1.505,587 $25,1 56 !682,449! 1657,279! 5,756 3,026 1,625 596 9 ,707 31 ,397 478,305 35,928 982,109 167,060 676,709 2,458,252 3,811 678,546 15,882 22,345 4,266,400 680,521 57,795 191,899 29,409 1,520,431 96,049 18,204 4,800 3,936 172 12 (750) 1,388 5,147 1,388 2,033 41,022 s 14 6,670 18,767 3,g54 1,226 2,870 1,631 25,794 1,388 1,690 3,723 3,317 600 51 ,588 61,260 3,622 3,622 51,707 550,727 186,160 6,428 122,575 865,890 313 3,488 78 3,489 25,957 1,008 11,679 609 ,022 46,409 423,753 3 ,480,965 3,886,603 3,886,603 22,125 26,165 5,676 2,890 5 ,967 5,530 56,000 84,218 14,096 593,776 818,127 382,705 2 ,719,341 291 ,462 115,507 71 ,600 71 ,600 187,107 187,107 2,525,891 905,000 268,605 2,525,891 905,000 268,605 0 !975! 8,313 48,958 8,118 1,226 18,300 531,809 ~ .518,509 Combined Total 200 113,976 15,304 0 (975 975 GRANTS Challenge Grants Mini· Gra nl s Computer Grants Other Grants Total Grants Excess Revenues Over Expenditures Beginning Net Assets Transfer from MCFV Cha nge in Net Assets Ending Net Assets s vc.........,.,_..,. s,_ .,.'".o...::~o~F FS 11·)1-ot 115,507 406,366 549,771 2,810,920 2,510,133 (3,480,832) (2,524,696) (2,442 ,352) (1 ,608,688) (11,838) (6,587,572) 17,681 ,330 23 ,002,382 11 ,1 16,830 4,027,731 598,295 38,745,238 !4,203,032! $ 13,478,298 (3,246,896 19,755,487 !2,442,352! p ,608,688! $8,674,478 $2,419,043 p1,838! $586,458 31,435,466 0 406,366 549,77 1 $3,217,285 $3,059,904 (7,309,772 �Council of Michigan Foundations Core Services Internal Statement of Activities 4-1-08 to 12-31-08 12 Month Budget 2008-09 Revenues Membership Investment Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Conference & Meetings Publications Other Income Investment Earnings Total Revenues Program/Admin Expenses Wages & Benefits Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Depreciation Technology Dues & Sponsorship Books & Subscriptions Communications/Publications Professional Services Travel Training & Seminars Conference & Meetings (Gain)/Loss Sale of Fixed Assets Overhead Allocation to Spec Projects Total Program/Admin 9 Month Budget 12/31/2008 $ 1,006,000 166,000 25,000 598,000 15,000 2,000 138,000 1,950,000 1,014 ,000 68,000 13,000 3,000 20,000 30,000 6,000 $ 988,000 166,000 25,000 553,000 11,300 2,000 11 1 ,000 1,856,300 760,400 51,000 9,600 2,200 14,900 22,500 6,000 9 Month Actual 12/31/2008 $ 982,109 167,060 22,692 654,421 14,698 200 83,694 1,924,875 Note 1 Note 2 Note 3 Note 4 717,247 51 ,066 9,903 1,930 6,310 16,281 3,954 2,033 Note 6 74,000 34,500 5,000 88,000 40,000 63,000 9,000 484,000 55,500 32,900 3,700 66,000 31,200 47,300 6,700 449,400 32,777 29,125 3,026 41 ,022 31 ,397 35,928 5,676 531 ,809 (1 ,500) 1,950,000 (1,200) 1 ,558, 100 (975) 1,518,509 Grants Challenge Grants Mini-Grants Computer Grants Other Grants Total Grants 0 0 0 Excess Revenues Over Expenditures 0 298,200 406,366 1,224,597 0 1,224,597 298,200 1,224,597 406,366 1,224,597 1,522,797 $1 ,630,963 Beginning Net Assets Excess Rev over Exp. Transfer to Core Endowment Ending Net Assets S:\Finance\Financial Statements\08·09\CMF FS 12-31·08 Projected 2008-09 Note 5 Note 7 Note 8 Note 9 Note 4 $994,000 167,000 23,000 650,000 18,000 1,000 95,000 1,948,000 970,000 70,000 13,000 2,500 14,000 22,000 4,000 30,000 67,000 33,000 5,000 66,000 40,000 63,000 9,000 536,000 (1 ,300) 1,943,200 4,800 �CMF Endowment Fu nds Consolidated Statement of Act ivities and Cha nges in Net Assets 4-1-08 to 12-31-08 Endowment Funds Revenues Spendable Income Membership Investment Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Conference Income Publications Other Income Investment Income Total Revenues Russell G. M aw by Johns on Allen Maw by Educational Fund Fund Fund For Kids 8,600 $ 73.000 $ 4 2,000 Fund $ 49,000 Community Foundation E ndowment MCFYP Rie cker hchnology Richardson Public Inves t. Endowment Fund Fund Policy Education ' ' 358,000 Comm Fdn 57.000 ' 56,000 ' 24.000 ' 22,000 Re itz ' 2.600 12 Month ' 30,000 100 23,600 (200) 125 1,170 22,145 (45,897) (391 ,078 (225.209) 37. 297 316,908 159.609 Program(Admin Expenses wages & Benefits Occupancy TelephOne Equipment l ease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Ins urance Equipment & Furniture Depreciation TechnolOgy Dues & Spons orship Books & Subscriptions 251 .428) 202.428 4 ,729 "' 37 195 8,600 100 234 39 Budget CMF Core ~ To tal ' 722,200 100 23,525 1.170 22.145 3 .795.667) 722,200 3.500 36, 100 1.919,035) 307.633) (304,172) (121.523) (95,091) (11 .556) 1.539,090 250.508 248,072 97.523 73,091 8.956 158,413 30.204 25.156 1,000 929 1,574 957 3.460 1,500 215 52 100 119 510 1,100 475 1.250 11.610 11,000 14.100 978 26,600 75, 100 675 2,810 100 100 (123,045) 93,045 16,556 3 .026.527 761.800 235,058 362,000 1.000 200 500 CommunicationsiPublications Professional Services 705 13,188 Travel Training & Seminars Conference & Meeting 17,704 1,594 3,249 4 9.148 9,007 2,610 6,454 1.956 1.795 12 23.658 57,572 199,307 36.505 75 Total Program/Ad m in 10,133 GRANTS Challenge Grants Mini-Grants Computer Grants Other G rants 561 41 ,025 10,359 1,050 ( 175) 38,974 10.133 16,556 26 ,165 5.530 31,000 56,000 95, 100 622,200 382.705 4 .000 20,000 39,000 Total G rants 2.600 39.000 Excess Revenues O ver Expenditures (37,297) Beginning Net A sset s Transfer from Other Funds Ex cess Revenues over Ex penditures Ending Net A ssets 212,485 45.897 $166.588 S :\Finance\Finandat Statements\08·09\CMF FS 12- 31- 08 (340.566) 1,819,686 413 ~6a) $ 1,406.1 20 (2 17,181) 1,044,771 259.181 $785,590 (241.428) 1,207,662 2.600 (1.738,397) (287.013) 8.877,491 1,425.335 (290.~28) (2.096.~97) (344.~13 $917,234 $6,781,094 $1.081.322 (287,046) 1.436,583 343,.;.6) $ 1.093,537 ( 107,656) (89,647) 568,371 (131 .~56 $436.71 5 30,000 30,000 ( 11.556) (123 ,045) 456,336 56.959 575,651 111 ,~7) (14 ,;56 153,045 $422,606 $344 ,689 $42.803 71 ,600 71 ,600 119,600 139,600 (3 ,480.832) 17,681,330 17,681,330 (4,203.~32 13 .478.298 ~ �CMF Council of Michi an Foun~ations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. Date: February 13, 2009 Memo to: Melonie Colaianne, Chairperson, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Rachel Mraz, CMF Trustee and Investment Committee Member and David R. Lindberg, Vice President Finance & Administration Re: December 31, 2008 Investment Report The following Resolution is presented fo r consideration: R ESOLVED that the December 31, 2008 Investment Report be accepted as presented. On a quarterly basis, the combined Investment Committees for the Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF), Midwest Community Foundations' Ventures (MCFV), Learning to Give (LTG) and the Michigan AIDS Fund (MAF), meet to review the investment performance for the operating and permanent endowment funds. New Business On February 12, 2009, the Investment Committee reviewed and approved the enclosed report. Since the October 13, 2008, CMF Board meeting, the Investment Committee has addressed the following items: After careful analysis the committee approved the remainder of the CMF Endowment Pool Investments be moved into the TIFF Multi Asset Fund. The CMF Executive Committee approved this recommendation on February 9, 2009. See attached memo. CMF also has a $1 million private equity commitment with the Commonfund of which $150,000 has been called to date. CMF also holds a $3 million endowment fund for the Learning to Give/LEAGUE project that is scheduled to be turned over to the LEAGUE by 20 10. Due to the entry and exit fees for the TIFF Multi Asset Fund this endowment fund will remain invested in standard asset allocation funds that CMF has used in the past. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\lnvestment Report 12-31 -08.doc �Investment Report Page 2 Alternative vs. Standa rd Allocation Investment Pools With the addition of the TIFF and Commonfund alternative products, the CMF Endowment Pool now has standard and alternative asset allocation pools. The standard allocation pool is rebalanced on a quarterly basis to the targeted asset allocation noted in the attached report. The TIFF investment product rebalancing is handled by TIFF. The combined allocation of the standard and alternative allocation pools will be monitored on a quarterly basis by the Investment Committee with adjustments between the two pools being made as the Committee deems appropriate. The combined investment return for the CMF Standard and Alternative Pools will be calculated as the various periods become available. The enclosed Investment Report is presented in the fo llowing two sections: Investment Performance Report & Asset Allocation The benchmark is based on the targeted asset allocation noted in the attached report using the following return information: Asset Class S&P 500 S&P 400 S&P 600 EAfE Lehman Bros. Aggregate Allocation 39.0% 10.0% 6.0% 14.0% 3 1.0% Investment Perfor mance Comparison Report In addition to the Cambridge & Associates, Inc. pool of colleges, universities, and foundations, the committee has recently added the TIFF Multi-Asset fund for comparative purposes. The TIFF product is unique in the fact that it offers smaller foundations access to alternative investment products which have enhanced returns over the last several years. The reason this report lags the CMF Investment Report by one quarter is due to the time it takes Cambridge & Associates to collect the results from the pool participants. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\lnvestment Report 12-310S.doc �Council of Michigan Foundations Investment Report December 31, 2008 Investment Balanc e 12-31-08 Actual Asset Allocation Money Mkt Tar geted Asset Allocation Money Mkt. Operating Funds CMF Operating & Special Projects $2,960,431 100% 100% MCFV Special Projects $3,356,354 100% 100% KYIP Fund $5,271,474 100% 100% Michigan AIDS Fund $264,055 100% 100% Learning to Give $179,737 100% 100% Note: All operating funds are invested in money market accounts. CMF Combined Endowment Pool -Asset Mix Market Value Equities Fixed Income Real Estate Alternatives Cash Total $7,873,775 3,866,136 13,604 1,034,455 78,880 12,866,850 % 61 .2% 30.0% 0.1 % 8.0% 0.6% 100.0% Endowment Pool Compound Annual Rate of Return One Year Three Year Five Year 10Year Ac tual Investment Return -26.31% N/A N/A N/A Blended Benchmark -24.37% N/A N/A N/A The CMF Endowment Pool has been broken down into two separate pools, a standard pool and an alternative pool. The asset mix listed above represents the combination of both pools. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\lnvest Report 12-31-08 �Council of Michigan Foundations Investment Report December 31, 2008 CMF Standard Endowment Pool- Asset Mix Market Value LargeCap MidCap SmaiiCap International Real Estate Equity Trust Total Equities $3,328,564 815,278 584,474 1 ,285,165 Cash Equivalents Short Bond Fund Bond Fund High Yield Bond Total Cash & Fixed Income Grand Total $ Actual % Target % 6,013,481 35.6% 8.7% 6.3% 13.8% 0.0% 64% 37% 9% 6% 13% 5% 70% 78,880 1,380,249 1,320,009 550,315 3,329,453 0.8% 14.8% 14.1% 5.9% 36% 0% 13% 13% 5% 30% 9,342,934 100% 100% Standard Endowment Pool Compound Annual Rate of Return One Year Three Year Five Year 10 Year Actual Investment Return -26.28% -3.88% 1.24% 2.68% Blended Benchmark -24.37% -3.91 % 0.89% 2.07% S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\lnvest Report 12-31-08 �Learning to Give Investment Report December 31, 2008 LTG Endowment Fund -Asset Mix Market Value LargeCap MidCap SmaiiCap International Real Estate Equity Trust Total Equities $837,969 209,606 138,276 311 ,571 Cash Equivalents Short Bond Fund Bond Fund High Yield Bond Total Cash & Fixed Income Grand Total Actual % $ Target % 1,497,422 37.3% 9.3% 6.2% 13.9% 0.0% 66.7% 37% 9% 6% 13% 5% 70% 23,418 302,140 309,800 113,907 749,265 1.0% 13.4% 13.8% 5.1 % 33.3% 0% 13% 13% 5% 30% 2,246,687 100% 100% Endowment Pool Compound Annual Rate of Return One Year Three Year Five Year 10Year Actual Investment Return -26.39% N/A N/A N/A Lipper Median Benchmark -24.37% -3.91 % 0.89% 2.07% Investment of this new endowment fund took place in May 2006 This fund was established with a $3,000,000 grant from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\lnvest Report 12-31-08 �Council of Michigan Foundations Investment Performance Comparison 9/30/2008 Actual Returns Period Ending Quarter One Year Blended Benchmark -7.42% CMF Cambridge Pooled Pool Funds (Median) -6.75% -10.80% TIFF Multi Asset -1 0.88% -14.15% -13.91% -14.20% -1 2.95% Three Years 1.89% 2.54% 3.80% 4.96% Five Years 6.07% 6.85% 7.90% 9.92% Ten Years 5.20% 6.04% 7.40% 8.39% Period Ending One Yr Three Yrs -21.3% 0.6% -22.0% 0.2% -18.0% 0.9% 0.6% 4.2% 1.1% -30.5% 4.9% 3.2% Five Yrs 6.0% 5.2% 8.1% 3.8% 9.7% 3.4% Bench Marks W ilshire 5000 S&P 500 Russell 2500 LB Aggregate MSCI EAFE CPI-U Qtr Ending -8.7% -8.4% -6.7% -0.5% -20.6% 0.0% Asset Categories Cambridge Pool US Equities International Equities Fixed Income (less high yield) Cash Other Total Other· Detail Real Estate Hedge Funds Distressed Securities Arbitrage Venture Capital Private Equity Oil & Gas Partnerships High Yield Bonds Other NMAA Absolute Return Commodities Othe r 23.6% 18.6% 17.7% 3.0% 37.1% 100.0% Asset Allocation CMF Target 55.0% 14.0% 26.0% 5.0% 100.0% 3.8% 13.4% 2.1% 5.3% 1.7% 3.8% 1.5% 0.2% 0.6% 1.4% 3.3% 37.1% Ten Yrs 4.0% 3.1% 9.0% 5.2% 5.0% 2.9% TIFF Multi Asset 49.1% Includes Inti & Resource 16.5% 34.4% 100.0% 0.4% 5.0% 1.6% 5.0% 22.9% 3.9% 5.6% 34.4% • Represents the latest return numbers available from Cambridge & TIFF. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materia ls\lnvest Report 12-31-08 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2009_BB_2009-02-24_Financials Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book financials Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book financials. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50760 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2009-02-24 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d042d7179f88fd31d48957d593d68e55.pdf d00285afc643fd2737f6197acfbe4c6c PDF Text Text SYMPOSIUM CMF ~ Council of Michigan Foundations Diversity &Inclusion 'IV in Philanthropy Serving grantmokers. Advancing giving. THE MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE MARCH 2- 4, 2009 Diversity Philanthropy I DETROIT, MI FINAL DRAFT PROGRAM OUTLINE EVENT GOALS & OBJECTIVES Goals: To explore how increasing diversity and inclusive practice within Michigan's philanthropic sector can increase effectiveness and improve social impact. To identify opportunities for inspiring and supporting action across the sector in Michigan and the nation. Objectives: Discover the existing strengths in Michigan's philanthropic sector for increasing diversity and inclusive practice Build a shared vision for a diverse and inclusive philanthropic sector Commit to individual and/or collective action DAY 1 -MONDAY, MARCH 2, 2009 Objectives: Establish expectations & context Begin building a community of practice TIME 1:30p.m. AGENDA ITEM/ DESCRIPTION Registration Opens 3:00p.m. Symposium Opening: Goals, Objectives, Agenda, Participants & Expectations/ Ground Rules 3:20p.m. Building Our Community- Self Introductions 4:00p.m. Welcome Statements 1. Our Partnership for Diversity & Inclusion Rob Collier, president & CEO, Council ofMichigan Foundations Henry A. J. Ramos, director, Diversity in Philanthropy Project 2. Michigan & Beyond: Promoting Voluntary Action for Diversity & Inclusion Sterling Speirn, president & CEO, W.K. Kellogg Foundation Carol Goss, president & CEO, The Skillman Foundation 4:30p.m. Our Own Stories -Individual & Small Group Work 5:00p.m. Reflections on Individual & Collective Aspirations 5:30p.m. Break 6 :00p.m. Reception & Dinner 7:00p.m. Dinner Presentation: Michigan a s a Context for our Work: Populations, Policies, Challenges and Opportunities Linda Parker, former director, Michigan Department ofCivil Rights (invited) Rob Collier, president & CEO, Council ofMichigan Foundations Breannah Alexander, member, Michigan Community Foundation Youth Project Committee Moderator: Karen Aldridge-Eason, foundation liaison, Office of the Foundation Liaison to the Governor 7:30p.m. Facilitated Table Discussions: The Promise of Statewide Philanthropic Action 8:30p.m. Adjourn for the Day �DAY 2- TUESDAY, MARCH 3, 2009 Objectives: Develop a shared vision of enhanced inclusivity and effectiveness for Mich igan and its philanthropic sector, building on collective assets Explore new frameworks, rationales and promising practices for building and maintaining d iverse and inclusive foundations TIME 7:00a.m. AGENDA ITEM/ DESCRIPTION Breakfast- Optional Roundtables 8:00a.m. Welcome Back & Today's Agenda 8:10a.m. Reflections 8:30a.m. Mapping Our Collective Strengths An exploration of t he group's collective strengths, experiences, resources and tools 9:30a.m. Understanding our Starting Point for Diversity in the Philanthropic Sector 1. Findings: Michigan Foundation Staff & Trustee Demographics Evaluation Team: David Bleckley, research coordinator, and Mary McDonald, former director, Community Research Institute at The Johnson Center for Philanthropy, Grand Valley State University 2. The National Picture Larry McGill, senior vice president for research, Foundation Center 10:15 a .m. Break 10:45a.m. Toward a Common Vision: Diversity & Inclusive Practice for Greater Community Impact A world cafe dialogue to explore a comm on vision for Michigan's philanthropic sector 12:00 p.m. Lunch 1:00p.m. Inside Foundations: Leadership, Culture & Practice 1. Leading Organizational Change: The Promise and Challenge of Diversity & Inclusion in Foundations Dr. Lynn Wooten, clinical associate professor, Ross School of Business, University of Michigan Dr. Mary Ellen Capek, consulranr, Diversity In Philanthropy Project 2. 2:30p.m. Reflection & Dialogue: Explore t he tipping points and motivators that build the will to focus on diversity, the opportunities to catalyze change, and t he organizational roadblocks to overcome. What's Happening in Michigan Foundations? 1. A Policy Review Evaluation Team: David Bleckley, research coordinator, and Mary McDonald, former director, Community Research Institute at The Johnson Center for Philanthropy, Grand Valley State University 2. Themes and Stories from the Field Jessica Bearman, consultant, Diversity in Philanthropy Project 3:30p.m. Breakout Discussions on Strategies & Practices Participants will participate in breakout sessions, led b y national resource people, focusing on a deeper investigation of specific aspects of diversity and inclusive p ractice in foundations, including: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Staff Diversity & Cultural Competency Organizational Policy & Practice (HR, Comm unications, etc.) Leadership for Organizational Change - the role ofthe b oard and executive leadership Stakeh older Engagement & Grantmaking Con necting Effectiveness and Diversity Other (TBD) 5:30p.m. Synthesis & Reflection for the Day 5:45p.m. Break 6:30p.m. Dinner & Discussion 8:00p.m. Adjourn for the Day �DAy 3 - WEDNESDAyI MARCH 4, 2009 Objectives: Explore opportunities/ challenges of organizational change from individual roles Identify opportunities in role-alike (trustees, CEOs, Program staff, etc.) groups Develop preliminary commitments to action (individual, foundation, group and CMF) TIME 7:15a.m. AGENDA ITEM/ DESCRIPTION Breakfast- Optional Roundtables 8:15a.m. Welcome Back: Thoughts & Reflections from Previous Day 8:45a.m. Role-Alike Group Dialogue/ Report Out Functional groups to examine specific opportunities, strategies, and needs (trustees; CEOs, program staff, administrative staff, etc). 10:15 a .m. Break 10:30a.m. What Now? Foundation Teams Commit to Next Steps/Report Out Foundation teams reflect on the last day and a half and articulate commitments and needs going forward. 11:15a.m. Discussion: What do we want to make happen collectively? What is CMF's role in making that happen? 12:00p.m. Final Reflections & Closing Comments 12:30 p.m. Adjourn (Optional Lunch) �SYMPOSIUM CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. ~ Diversity & Inclusion 'II' in Philanthropy THE MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE MARCH 2 - 4 , 2009 Diversity Philanthropy I DETROIT, M I PARTICIPANT ROSTER AS OF 2.13.09 Ms. Karen Aldridge-Eason Foundation liaison Office of Foundation liai son PO Box 30013 111 South Capitol Avenue Lansing Ml48909-7513 517-241-1689 aldridgeeasonk@michigan.gov Ms. Ronna Alexander Alexander Ink PO Box 1073 Douglas Ml 49406-1073 269-857-7633 pink@accn.o rg Ms. Breannah Alexander YAC Member Saginaw Community Foundation 52406 Pheasant Run Dr Saginaw Ml 48638-6398 breannahalexander@hotmail.com Ms. Tonya Allen Vice President of Program The Skillman Foundation 100 Talon Centre Dr Ste 100 Detroit Ml 48207-4266 313-393-1185 tallen@skillman.org Mr. Ron Ancrum President Associated Grant Makers 55 Court St Ste 520 Boston MA 02108-2104 617-426-2606 rancrum@agmconnect.org Ms. Jessica Bearman Consultant 519 East B Street Moscow ID 83843 208-882-1678 jessica.bearman@gmail.com Mr. David Blackley Research Coordinator Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy 401 Fulton St W C/0 Grand Valley State University Grand Rapids Ml 49504-6431 616-331-6692 blecklda@gvsu.edu Ms. Jacquelynne Borden-Conyers Communications Manager W.K. Kellogg Foundation 1 Michigan Ave E Battle Creek Ml49017-4005 269-969-2313 ibconyers@wkkf.org Ms. Crystal Coleman Human Resources Director The Kresge Foundation 3215 W Big Beaver Rd Troy Ml 48084-2818 248-643-9630 cycoleman@kresge.org Ms. Renee Branch Director Diversity & Inclusive Practices Council on Foundations 2121 Crystal Dr Ste 700 Arlington VA 22202-3706 703-879-0625 branr@cof.org Ms. Terreance Coleman Program Associate Community Foundations Council of Michigan Foundations 100 Talon Centre Dr Ste 150 Detroit Ml 48207-4465 313-566-2444 tcoleman@michiganfoundations.org Ms. Kimberly Burton Vice President of Corporate Services Council of Michigan Foundations 100 Talon Centre Dr Ste 150 Detroit Ml 48207-4266 313-566-2444 kburton@michiganfoundations.org Mr. Robert Collier President & CEO Counci l of Michigan Foundations 1 S Harbor Dr Ste 3 Grand Haven Ml49417-1385 616-842-7080 rcollier@michiganfoundations.org Ms Mary Ellen Capek Philanthropy and Nonprofit Research Capek & Associates 280 Dixon Rd Corrales NM 87048-7722 505-890-6466 mecapek@me.com Mr. Phil D'Anieri Program Director Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation 301 N Main St Ste 300 Ann Arbor Ml48104-1133 734-663-0401 pdanieri@aaacf.org Ms. Caroline Chambers President Comerica Charitable Foundation PO Box75000 Detroit Ml 48275-0001 313·222-3571 caroline chambers@comerica.com Mr. Paul Doyle Chair Grand Rapids Community Foundation 185 Oakes St SW Grand Rapids Ml 49503 616-454·1751 doylpt@sbcglobal.net Ms. Melonie Colaianne President MASCO Corporation Foundation 21 001 Van Born Rd Taylor Ml48180-1340 313-792-6378 melonie colaianne@mascohg.com Mr. Garland Doyle Founder Doyle Fund - Nonprofit Workforce Capacity Building 247 Samburu St Pontiac Ml48341-1063 248-346-3917 gdoyle@doylephilanthropy.com Ms. Andrea Cole Executive Director & CEO Ethel and James Flinn Foundation 333 W Fort St Ste 1950 Detroit Ml 48226-3154 313·309-3437 acole@flinnfoundation.org Participant Roster - 1 Ms. Cheryl Elliott President and CEO Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation 301 N Main St Ste 300 Ann Arbor Ml48104-1133 734-663-0401 info@aaacf.org �SYMPOSIUM CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. ~ Diversity & Inclusion 'II' in Philanthropy THE MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE MARCH 2 - 4 , 2009 Diversity Philanthropy I DETROIT, M I PARTICIPANT ROSTER AS OF 2_13.09 Ms. Dolores Ennis Trustee Ruth Mott Foundation 111 E Court St Suite 3C Flint Ml 48502-1649 810-233-0170 Ms. Deborah Higgins Program Associate The John E. Fetzer Institute 9292 West KL Avenue Kalamazoo Ml49009-5316 269-375-2000 dhiggins@fetzer.org Mr. Sylvester Jones Jr. Program Officer Ruth Mott Foundation 111 E Court St Suite 3C Flint Ml 48502-1649 81 0-233·0170 sjones@rmfdn.org Mr. Robert Espinoza Director of Research Funders for Lesbian & Gay Issues 116 E 16th St FIG New York NY 10003-2163 212-475-2930 robert@lgbtfunders.org Ms. Kathi Horton President Community Foundation of Greater Flint 500 S Saginaw St Ste 200 Flint Ml 48502-1804 810-767-8270 Mr. Tom Kam Deputy Director of Programs Arcus Foundation 402 E Michigan Ave Kalamazoo Ml 49007-3888 269-373-4373 tom@arcusfoundation.org Ms. DaDe Esque President & CEO Nokomis Foundation 161 Ottawa Ave NW Ste 305C Waters Building Grand Rapids Ml49503-2710 616-451-0267 desgue@nokomisfoundation.org Ms. Susan Howbert Director Family Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations 100 Talon Centre Dr Ste 150 Detroit Ml 48207-4465 313-566-2444 showbert@aol.com Ms. Christee Khan Human Resources Manager The John E. Fetzer Institute 9292 West KL Avenue Kalamazoo Ml 49009-5316 269-375·2000 ckhan@fetzer.org Ms. Jeri Fischer Director Membership & Special Projects Council of Michigan Foundations 1 S Harbor Dr Ste 3 Grand Haven Ml 49417-1385 616-842-7080 jfi scher@michiganfoundations.org Ms. Sonya Hughes VP of Diversity Initiatives and Programs Grand Rapids Chamber of Commerce 111 Pearl St NW Grand Rapids Ml 49503-2804 616-771-0321 hughess@grandrapids.org Mr. William King President Minnesota Council on Foundations 100 Portland Ave Ste 225 Minneapolis MN 55401-2575 612-335·3557 bking@mcf.org Mr. Andrew Gatewood Program Officer The Kresge Foundation 3215 W B ig Beaver Rd Troy Ml 48084-2818 248-643-9630 argatewood@kresge.o rg Ms. Wendy Jackson Program Officer The Kresge Foundation 3215 W Big Beaver Rd Troy Ml 48084-2818 248·643-9630 wljackson@kresge.org Mr. Mike Goorhouse Program Associate Community Foundations Council of Michigan Foundations 14259 Spruce Hollow Dr. Holland Ml 49424 616-842-7080 mgoorhouse@michiganfoundations.org Ms. Jan Jaffe Project Leader Grant Craft Ford Foundation 320 E 43rd St New York NY 10017-4801 212-573-5287 j.jaffe@fordfound .org Ms. Carol Goss President and CEO The Skillman Foundation 100 Talon Centre Dr Ste 100 Detroit Ml48207-4266 313-393-1185 mailbox@skillman.org Mr. Johnny Jenkins Jr. Michigan Program Officer Arcus Foundation 402 E Michigan Ave Kalamazoo Ml49007-3888 269·373-4373 johnny@arcusfoundation.org Participant Roster - 2 Mr. Edmund Lewis Program Associate Max M. and Marjorie S. Fisher Foundation 2 Towne Square Ste 920 Southfield Ml 48076 Ms. Valerie Lies President and CEO Donors Forum 208 S La Salle St Ste 1540 Chicago IL 60604-1000 312-578-0090 vlies@donorsforum.org Mr. David Lindberg VP Finance and Administration Council of Michigan Foundations 1 S Harbor Dr Ste 3 Grand Haven Ml49417-1385 616-842·7080 dlindberg@michiganfoundations.org �SYMPOSIUM CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. ~ Diversity & Inclusion 'II' in Philanthropy THE MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE MARCH 2 - 4 , 2009 Diversity Philanthropy I DETROIT, M I PARTICIPANT ROSTER AS OF 2_13.09 Ms. Dana Linnane Public Policy Fellow Council of Michigan Foundations 1 S Harbor Dr Ste 3 Grand Haven Ml49417-1385 616-842-7080 dllnnane@michiganfoundations.org ltm@fdncenter.org Ms. Donnell Mersereau Director Community Foundations Council of Michigan Foundations 1 S Harbor Dr Ste 3 Grand Haven Ml49417-1385 616·842-7080 dmersereau@michiganfoundatlons.or Ms. Monica Lonk Human Resource Manager Battle Creek Community Foundation 34 Jackson St W One Riverwalk Ctr Battle Creek Ml49017-3505 269-962-2181 monical@bccfoundation.org 9 Mrs. Mary Maurer Secretary St. Ignace Area Community Foundation 160 Church St PO Box 315 Saint Ignace Ml 49781-1602 906-847-3701 info@st.ignace.com Mr. Wesley Maurer Jr. Trustee Mackinac Island Community Foundation 359 Reagon St PO Box277 Saint Ignace Ml 49781-1134 906-643-9150 wes@stignacenews.com Ms. Mary McDonald Ph.D. Assistant Professor University of San Diego 5998 Alcala Park San Diego CA 92110-2492 619-260-2747 marymc@sandieqo.edu Mr. Jason McGill Director of Member Services New York Regional Association of Grantmakers 79 Fifth Ave 4th Floor New York NY 10003-3034 212-714-0699 imcgill@nyrag.org Mr. Lawrence McGill Senior VP for Research Foundation Center 79 5th Ave New York NY 10003-3034 212-807-3634 Mr. Lawrence Moon Chairperson Community Foundation of Greater Flint 906 W Flint Park Blvd Lawrence E Moon Funeral Home Flint Ml 48505-3154 810-789-6666 lemoonfh@bignet.net Ms. Dawn Moore-Dixon Asst Director Third Millennium Init. The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University 719 Indiana Ave Ste 370 Indianapolis IN 46202-3176 317-278-8991 dawnmoor@iupui.edu Ms. Sandra Murphy Director of Donor Services Community Foundation of Greater Flint 500 S Saginaw St Ste 200 Flint Ml 48502-1804 810·767-3653 smurphy@cfgf.org Mr. Patrick Naswell VP of Community Impact Community Foundation of Greater Flint 500 S Saginaw St Ste 200 Flint Ml 48502-1804 810-767-3504 pnaswell@cfgf.org Mr. Robert Neumann Photographer Big Event Studios 312 Ellsworth Ave Grand Rapids Ml 49503 616·454-1001 rneumann@bigeventstudios.com Ms. Mariam Noland President Participant Roster - 3 Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan 333 W Fort St Suite 2010 Detroit Ml 48226-3134 313-961·6675 cfsem@cfsem.org Ms. Rebecca Noricks Communications Manager Council of Michigan Foundations 1 S Harbor Dr Ste 3 Grand Haven Ml 49417-1385 616-842·7080 rnoricks@michiganfoundations.org Ms. Danielle Olekszyk Chief Financial Officer & Treasurer The Skillman Foundation 100 Talon Centre Dr Ste 100 Detroit Ml 48207-4266 313-393·1185 dolekszyk@skillman.org Ms. Carol Paine-McGovern President Paine Family Foundation 2445 Hall Street SE Grand Rapids Ml 49506-3504 616-285-0409 painemcgov@aol.com Ms Anna Pond Consultant Anna Pond Consulting 95 Saint Marks Ave Brooklyn NY 11217-2410 718-789-0187 annapond@aol.com Mr. Henry Ramos Principal Mauer Kunst Consulting 9750 Random Canyon Way Creston CA 93432-9604 805-438-4 737 mauerkunst@yahoo.com Ms. Marcia Rapp Vice President of Programs Grand Rapids Community Foundation 185 Oakes St SW Grand Rapids Ml 49503 616-454-1751 mrapp@grfoundation.org Ms. Kimberly Roberson Program Officer Charles Stewart Mott Foundation 503 S Saginaw St Ste 1200 �SYMPOSIUM CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. ~ Diversity & Inclusion 'II' in Philanthropy THE MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE MARCH 2 - 4 , 2009 Diversity Philanthropy I DETROIT, M I PARTICIPANT ROSTER AS OF 2_13.09 Mott Foundation Building Flint Ml 48502-1807 810-238-5651 kroberson@mott.org Participant Roster - 4 �SYMPOSIUM CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. ~ Diversity & Inclusion 'II' in Philanthropy THE MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE MARCH 2 - 4 , 2009 Diversity Philanthropy I DETROIT, M I PARTICIPANT ROSTER AS OF 2_13.09 Ms. Vicki Rosenberg VP Education, Comm. & External Relations Council of Michigan Foundations 1 S Harbor Dr Ste 3 Grand Haven Ml49417-1385 616-842-7080 vrosenberg@michiganfoundations.org Mr. Chris Smith Program Officer Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan 333 W Fort St Suite 2010 Detroit Ml48226-3134 313-961·6675 csmith@cfsem.org Mr. Randall Ross Senior Program Officer Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan 333 W Fort St Suite 2010 Detroit Ml48226-3134 313-961-6675 rross@cfsem .org Mr. Sterling Speirn President and CEO W.K. Kellogg Foundation 1 Michigan Ave E Battle Creek Ml 49017-4005 269-968-1611 sterling.speirn@wkkf.org Ms. Beverly Spriggs Program Associate Council of Michigan Foundations 100 Talon Centre Dr Ste 150 Detroit Ml 48207-4465 313-566·2444 bspriggs@michiganfoundations.o rg Ms. Gloria Royal Director of Communications Arcus Foundation 402 E Michigan Ave Kalamazoo Ml49007-3888 269-373-4373 gl oria@arcusfoundation.org Mr. Douglas Stewart Executive Director Max M. and Marjorie S. Fisher Foundation 2 Towne Square Ste 920 Southfield Ml 48076 248-415-1432 Ms. Catherine Ryan Producer luna Productions 1210 Masonic Ave Apt 3 Berkeley CA 94706-2354 510-526-9500 catherine@lunaproductions.com Ms. Diana Sieger President Grand Rapids Community Foundation 185 Oakes St SW Grand Rapids Ml 49503 616-454-1751 grfoundation@grfoundation.org Ms. Kathy Szenda Wilson leadership Officer Battle Creek Community Foundation 34 Jackson St W One Riverwalk Ctr Battle Creek Ml 49017-3505 269-962·2181 kathy@bccfoundation.org Mr. lan Slattery Sound Recordist luna Productions 121 0 Masonic Ave Apt 3 Berkeley CA 94706-2354 510-526-9500 ian@lunaproductions.com Ms. Lori Villa rosa Executive Director Philanthropic Initiative for Racial Equity 1700 N St NW Washington DC 20036-2907 202-375-7772 villarosa@racialeguit v.org Mr. l arry Smith Director Millennium Initiative The Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University 719 Indiana Ave Ste 370 Indianapolis IN 46202-3176 317-278-8979 larrsmit@iupui.edu Ms. Vernetta Walker Director of Consulting BoardSource 1828 l Street NW Suite 900 Washington DC 20036-5114 202-204-7966 vwalker@boardsource.org Participant Roster - 5 �SYMPOSIUM CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. ~ Diversity & Inclusion 'II' in Philanthropy THE MICHIGAN EXPERIENCE MARCH 2 - 4 , 2009 Diversity Philanthropy I DETROIT, M I PARTICIPANT ROSTER AS OF 2.13.09 Dr. Alice Warner-Mehlhorn Program Director in Policy W.K. Kellogg Foundation 1 Michigan Ave E Battle Creek Ml49017-4005 269-969-2229 alice.warner@w kkf.org Mr. Gary Weimberg Director Luna Productions 121 0 Masonic Ave Apt 3 Berkeley CA 94706-2354 510-526-9500 gary@lunaproductions.com Ms. Adrienne Wells Education Initiative Project Assistant Ohio Grantmakers Forum 37 W Broad St Suite 800 Columbus OH 43215-4198 614-224-1344 awell s@ohioqrantmakers.org Mr. Steven Wilson Executive Director Ruth Mott Foundation 111 E Court St Suite 3C Flint Ml48502-1649 810-233-0170 swilson@rmfdn.org Ms. Lynn Wooten Clinical Associate Professor University of Michigan 701 Tappan Ave Ann Arbor Ml48109-1234 lpwooten@umlch.edu Participant Roster - 6 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2009_BB_2009-02-24_Diversity-in-Philanthropy Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book diversity in philanthropy Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book diversity in philanthropy. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50759 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2009-02-24 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/8f1c140bf374d85d2b264c5239357d74.pdf f7a0104c022528213945c3ce9619e10f PDF Text Text CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Serving grontmokers. AdVancing giving. February 15,2009 Memo to: Melanie Colaianne, Chairperson, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Carol Goss, Chairperson Governance Committee and Chair Initiative Advisory Committee Vicki Rosenberg, Vice President, Education, Communications External Relations Re: Transforming Michigan Philanthropy Through Diversity & Inclusion (TMP) - Progress from October 2009 through January 2009 TMP is a five-year initiative approved by the CMF Board of Trustees at its Feb. 2008 meeting with a goal to increase the effectiveness and accountability oforganized philanthropy in Michigan. The purpose of this memo is to highlight progress since the last Board Meeting in October. Highlights by Objective 1: Become a model regional association and resource to national field Research & Data Collection - Organizational, Board & Membership Development • Demographic survey of tmstees, staff and youth advisory council (YAC) members in Michigan completed (Attachment A) • Review of CMF internal, board and member policies completed (Attachment B) • Attitudes & Perceptions Survey of CMF employees completed; survey of Trustees being redone in late February 2009 at the direction of the Executive Committee • Identification of organizational and board development consultants and resources National Outreach • Member of national leadership team formed by Diversity in Philanthropy Project (DPP) to design a national strategy to advance diversity and inclusive practice through the national infrastructure for philanthropy and project leader for ?-regional association team • Subject of articles in DPP e-newsletter and ofDPP documentary to premier at COF annual conference • Resource for foundations (most recently St. Paul Foundation and Denver Foundation), organizations (Aspen Institute) and others 2: Increase member awareness, understanding, action Communications & Education • Special area of website with history, advisory committee, board actions, goals, objectives and activities launched Oct. 2008 �Diversity & Inclusion Report February 2009 Page 2 3: Help 20 member foundations achieve their goals forD & I and social equity • Landscape scan (interviews and policy review) underway of goals, objectives, policies and practices of CMF member foundations participating in March 2009 Symposium on Diversity & Inclusion in Philanthropy: The Michigan Experience • 85 CMF members, trustees and staff; national experts and DPP leaders attending March 2-4, 2009 CMF-DPP co-sponsored Symposium on Diversity & Inclusion in Philanthropy: The Michigan Experience to launch peer learning network (Agenda Attachment C) 4: Increase the diversity of foundation staff, trustees, execs. • Research on effective models and outreach to potential partners in higher education, ethnically based professional associations and other groups underway to inform final strategies and tactics Internal Progress • New Director of Diversity and Inclusive Practice created and filled in November by Kimberly Burton • Internal management team formed with three vice presidents (team charter attached) • Social equity added to objectives 2 and 3 • FY09 work plan drafted for Advisory Committee input March 2, 2009 • $35,000 grant received from Skillman Foundation • $1,350,000 in decisions pending at Kresge and Kellogg Foundations � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2009_BB_2009-02-24_Diversity-and-Inclusion Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book diversity and inclusion Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book diversity and inclusion. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50758 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2009-02-24 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/db4676295ca8a67d7f356a8d882419bb.pdf e08a17310afeb7c5e308e576d9590fe7 PDF Text Text Policy Review: Council of Michigan Foundations' Transforming Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative Prepared November 2008 by: The Community Research Institute The Johnson Center at Grand Valley State University �Policy Review - CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... .......................... .... 3 Purpose ........... ........................................................................................................ .......................... ......................... 3 Methodology ................................................................................................................................ .............................. 3 Discussion of Policies O verall ......................................................................................................... .............................. 4 Necess ity ofPolicies ............................................................................................... .......................... ........................ .4 CMF's Policies O verall ............................................................. .................................................. ............................. .4 Incorporation of Diversity and Inclusion in CMF's Policie s ..... .................................................. ............................. .4 Discussion of Staff-related Policies ............................................................................ .......................... ......................... 5 HR Procedure .............................................................................................................................. .............................. 5 Employee Handbook ................................................................................................................... .............................. 5 Equity ........ ......................................................................................................... ..................... .............................. 5 Inclusion .................................................................................................................................. .............................. 5 Discussion of Board-related Policies ............................................................................................................................. 6 Trustee Conflict of Interest/Code of Conduct ......................................................... .......................... ......................... 6 Bylaw s ......................................................................................................................................... .............................. 6 Discussion of Me mber-related Po licies ............... ..................................................................................................... ..... 7 Membership Criteria ............................................................................................... .......................... ......................... 7 Bylaw s ......................................................................................................................................... .............................. ? Discussion of Diversity and Jnclus ivity o f Policy-make rs ............................................................... .............................. 7 Diversity of Policy -makers ........................................................ ............................. .......................... ......................... 7 Inclusion of Staff in Policy De ve lopment. ................................................................................... .............................. 7 Diversity Efforts as Organizational Change ........ ............................................................................ .............................. 8 Leadership ..... ..................................................................................................... .... ..................... .............................. 8 Organizational Culture ............................................................................................................................................... 8 The Role of Policy in CMF' s Transforming Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative ......... 9 Appendix I: List of Resources ..................................................................................................................................... 10 Appendix JJ: Rubric for Rev iew ing Policies ................................. .................................................. ............................ 11 Appendix JJI: Interview Questions .............................................................................................................................. 12 Appendix TV: Literature Review of Organizational Cu lture, Organizational Change, and Diversity ......................... 13 Organizational Culture ............................................................................................................................................. l3 Dive rsity ................................................................................................................. ................................................. 13 Organizational Change ........................................................................................... ..................... ............................ 14 Leadership and Change ................................................................................................................ ............................ l4 Organizational Culture and Organizational Change ............................................... ................................................. 15 Jnclusiv ity and Organizational Change ............................................................... ..................................................... l5 The Role of Diversity and Inclus ion in Organizational Culture and Change ..... ......................... ............................ 15 Conclusion ........................................................................................................... .................................................... 17 References .............................................................................................................. ..................... ............................ 18 2 �Policy Review - CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative Introduction Purpose The Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF) approached the Community Research Institute (CRT) at the Johnson Center at Grand Valley State University to undertake research and evaluation associated with CMF's Transforming Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative. Several specific elements make up the body of the research, including: a survey of M ichigan foundations to quantify the demographics of organized philanthropy's staffs and boards, a survey of CMF's staff and board regarding their attitudes and perceptions of diversity, tracking of CMF's external activities surrounding diversity, tracking of recognition ofCMF as a leader in diversity, and a review ofCMF's policies to determine how integral diversity and inclu sion are thereto. This report focuses on that policy review; CRTdeveloped the methodology below to examine CMF's policies and policy development processes. Methodology CRT conducted a comprehensive rev iew of the literature surrounding diversity in organizational policies and established that there is no standard format for reviewing the role of d iversity in policy. CRT then looked to the philanthropic literature to examine the potential for diversity in policy (please see Appendix I for a list of some of the resources). T his literature review allowed CRI to outline best practices in the sector and to form these practices into a rubric to be used when reading CMF's policies (please see Appendix II for this rubric). One key finding is that d iversity and inclusion should permeate multiple policies rather than acting as a standalone policy. CRT then read and analyzed all of the written policies which CMF had provided. While the rubric was a useful tool in this process, CRT focused mainly on the following two questions: In this section or e lement of the policy, is there a way that diversity and inclusion should be incorporated? If there is a way that d iversity and inclusion should be integrated into this section of the policy, to w hat extent does CMF take the oppornmity to incorporate them? Beyond the examination of the policy documents themselves, CRT interviewed the entire staff of CMF as well as the Council' s Board Chair, immediate past Board Chair, and Governance Committee Chair (p lease see Appendix III for interview questions). The purpose of these interviews was to assess: how included staff and board are in policy development, how accessible policies are to staff and board members, and how d iverse the policy makers are. 3 �Policy Review- CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative Discussion of Policies Overall Necessity of Policies One way to analyze policies is to focus on how they facilitate the way people work together for a unified cause in the organization and the extent to which the policies ensure that people are moving in the same d irection. Policies can take the form of rules, regulations, standards, decisions, and visions. Written policies serve as a skeleton to support the work of an institution and can solidify informal practices to prevent divergent work. Moreover, policies can also communicate an organization's values and methods to external audiences. Policies work to formalize and document the work of an institution and are therefore affected by organizational culture, internal environmen t, and leadership. Written policies can strengthen, reinforce, and even catalyze these means of guiding an organization's practices. Clearly w ritten, policies allow an organization to have a precise, unified understanding of expectations and standards, and can provide a means for accountability (assuming that policies are implemented equitably). CMF's Policies Overall The most immediately noticeable aspect ofCMF's policies is that they are brief and few in number. The Bylaws and the Emp loyee Handbook comprise the bulk of written policies, and interviewees stated that they are comfortable with accessing these documents on the organization's shared drive and receiving annual updates via email and meetings. The limited quantity of policies is intentional. During the course of the interviews it became c lear that many of the staff thought that increased policies would be burdensome. The limited nature of the policies allows for flexibility and nimbleness, which many interviewees cited as critical to CMF's ability to react to increased community diversity in the future. This type of fluidity is specifically stated in the Employee Handbook: " In order to retain the flexibility necessary to the effective administration of policies and procedures, CMF reserves the right to change, revise, or eliminate any of the policies ... described in th is 'Handbook' ... " While there are benefits to having policies which are small in scale, some anecdotes from the interviews suggest that a minimal emphasis on policy has created some confusion about policies and feelings that certain informal practices are not adequately documented-therefore potentially inhibiting equitable implementation. Incorporation of Diversity and Inclusion in CMF's Policies Considering CMF's relatively limited number of policies, it is no t surprising that some of the policies includ ed in best practice models for incorporating diversity and inclusion are not present. For instance, CMF does not have a policy stating that it strives to deal with diverse vendors, but there are no policies related to vendors at a ll. It is important to note that a lack of policy does not necessarily translate to a lack of practice-CMF may very well make every effort to do business with diverse vendors. Stated policies, however, can help solidify and nurture practices, especially if they are associated with defined goals (to continue the vendor example, a goal may be to receive 30% of supplies and services from diverse vendors). With this in mind, the policies CMF does have varied in the degree to which they incorporate diversity and inclusion. Most of the policies integrate gender inclusive language and some of them encourage inclusivity in practice such as hiring and holiday time off. In fact, one of CMF's values is Inclusion, and the organization has a c lear, multifaceted "Value on Inclusion" statement. The next three sections of this report deal with the role of diversity and inclusion in policies specifically related to CMF's staff, board, and membership. They are broken up into present strengths of the policies' incorporation of diversity and inclusion and potential areas to become even more inclusive. 4 �Policy Review- CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative Discussion of Staff-related Policies HR Procedure P resen t: The document entitled Policies and Procedures Handbook and labeled " HR Procedure" is a brief two-page overview ofCMF's procedures for hiring and exiting. One element of this policy is especially strong regarding diversity and inclusion, while some other statements could be augmented to better incorporate these values. T he policy specifically states that job postings will be sent to "publications that target minority candidates." This is evidence that CMF is actively attempting to attract a d iverse workforce. Poten tia l: To improve further, the policy could state the extent to which questions pertaining to d iversity and inclusion are to be included in interviews (both pre-selection and exit). Further enhancing the section on interviews, CMF could state that applicants will be interviewed by a diverse panel, as d ifferent points of view may provid e a richer insight as to wh ich candidate would be optimal. Stating that new employees receive copies of the employee handbook and diversity and inclusion value statement on their first day of work would also help exemplify CMF's value of inclusion in the "HR Procedure" section. Employee Handbook The employee handbook comprises one of the largest parts of CMF's written policies. The areas of this document pertaining to diversity and inclusion can be roughly divided into two classifications: equity and inclusion. Equity Presen t: There are several sections of the employee handbook that deal with diversity as it relates to fairness or dictated by law. CMF' s equal employment opportunity policies are mentioned on the employee acknowledgement form at the front of the handbook. Later in the document, the "Equal Employment Opportunity" section discusses CMF's anti-discrimination policy and describes how an employee can report discrimination, but there is no mention of encouraging diversity. The section on harassment is exemplary. It prohibits harassment based upon numerous factors (race, ethnicity, age, religion, national origin, sexual orientation, gender identity, etc.) in addition to sex and protects employees w ho report threatening treatment. The policy goes on to state that no t only is the harassment of one staff member by another forbidden, an employee's mistreatment of anyone w hile o n CMF business o r a member or vendor's harassment of a CMF staff member will also face disciplinary or legal action. This policy is strong in its commitment to humane, equitable treatment for all stakeholders and community members. P otential: There is a difference between preventing and punishing discrimination and actively promoting diversity; the "Equal Employment Opportunity" section could mention that CMF strives for a diverse staff. The "WhistleBlower/Code of Conduct" section could add inclusion to the list of values ("respect, fairness, and integrity"). The policy related to harassment could be more inclusive by amending the section proscribing sexual harassment using CMF computer resources to state that hate-related/discriminatory material of any kind, regardless of basis, is forbidden. Inclusion P r esen t: In addition to the more equity-related policies, the employee handbook has several sections that successfully incorporate inclusivity. At the start of the handbook, CMF states its Mission, Goals, and Values. As mentioned above, inclusion is one ofCMF's Values, and the handbook goes on to spell out specific points of th is value. CMF allows staff time off to celebrate holidays and to opt out of paid holidays. This type of benefit shows a sensitivity toward employees who celebrate culturally- or religiousl y-specific holidays and also provides an 5 �Policy Review- CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative opportunity for staff members to discuss their religions or cultures at work, encouraging cultural competency. A further strength of the employee handbook is that it uses gender-inclusive language throughout. Potential: The employee handbook also had a few areas which could be improved to better showcase CMF's value of inclusion. The "Work Schedules" section could add a statement regarding scheduling flexibility for religious, cultural, or personal reasons. The " D ress Code" could encourage individuals to feel comfortable wearing ethnic clothing. There is no mention of whether or not fathers or adoptive parents may use short-term disability benefits for pregnancy, birth, and adoption purposes. While policies are in place providing professional development and tuition reimbursement for all staff members, a statement encouraging employees who are traditionally underrepresented in management positions to take advantage of these benefits would help highlight of methods used by CMF to create a pipeline for diverse leadership. Lastly, the immigration section could reiterate CMF's value of inclusion of persons of diverse national origins. Discussion of Board-related Policies Trustee Conflict of Interest/Code of Conduct Potential: The 2008 Trustee Conflict of Interest/Code of Conduct Policy is a one page document followed by a space in which trustees can report potential conflicts of interest. This brief policy uses gender inclusive language, but there are a couple of areas which could be strengthened to better exemplify CMF's value of inclusion. The "Statement of Position" allows trustees to comment on their opinions, regard less of conflict of interest. This section could be expanded to highlight that CMF values diverse opinions and encourages trustees from diverse backgrounds to participant in all discussions. This document could also include a statement regarding trustees' duty to uphold CMF's value of inclusion when dealing on CMF's behalf. Bylaws Potential: A large portion ofCMF's bylaws deal with its board of trustees and various committees. Diversity and inclusion are not nearly as incorporated into this document as they are in the employee handbook. When describing the qualifications of trustees, officers, and committees, there is no mention of encouraged diversity. This may be because these individuals are selected through voting rather than an application process. If this is the case, CMF could still state that it encourages members to be cognizant of d iversity in their voting, thereby nurturing an organizational culture that values inclusion. The bylaws call for one youth trustee under 30, but given generational differences in viewpoints, it may be more effective to have both a young adult trustee and a youth trustee (such as a YACer). However, CMF may deem this unnecessary, given the youth involvement in the Michigan Community Foundations' Youth Project Advisory Committee. CMF is heavily focused upon diversity and inclusion, and it may be advisable for the board to establish a Diversity and Inclusion Committee. In the statement that the Board is responsible for compensation decisions, there could be a sentence stating that the Board is conscientious to provide equitable pay to all. The final recommendation for the bylaws dealing with trustees is that the word "Chair" would be more inclusive than "Chairman." 6 �Policy Review - CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative Discussion of Member-related Policies As a membership organization, CMF's membership affects (and is often at the heart of) the organization's policies. As mentioned above, the members' voting on the Board may prevent CMF from including a diversity statement in its bylaws related to trustee selection. Some interviewees mentioned that because CMF is a membership organization with a constituency covering the full spectrum of political, cultural, and other viewpoints it is often difficult for the organization to move in any given direction without upsetting some part of the membership. T his is a constant concern in the minds of staff and board members. Membership Criteria Potential: The Criteria for Membership document outlines what types of organizations may be members of CMF. There a few considerations the organization may wish to discuss to encourage a more inclusive membership. First, CMF may want to require members to have an internal anti-discrimination or diversity statement regarding its grantmaking and/or board and staff. Second, the minimum annual grantmaking amount may deter new foundatio ns from traditionally underrepresented populations from becoming members. Lastly, some ethnic groups practice less formal methods of philanthropy which cannot be covered by CMF's current membership criteria. IfCMF could develop a way to include practitioners of these types of philanthropy, it could greatly diversify its membership. Bylaws Potential: CMF's bylaws begin by focusing on membership. This opening section does not specify intentional efforts to attract diverse members or to address issues of less formal philanthropic practices. The sections devoted to member voting and participation do not specifically state that CMF encourages the inclusion of diverse member voices. Discussion of Diversity and lnclusivity of Policy-makers Part of the interviews with staff and board members focused upon the diversity of those involved in policy development and how included interviewees felt their voices were in policy making processes. Diversity of Policy-makers One way to demonstrate transparently that an organization values diversity is to have a diverse group of policymakers. An interesting finding from the interviews was that there was no common definition of the policy development process. There were a number of unique perspectives on who makes policy. Despite the heterogeneity of responses, the re was still general consensus that those involved in policymaking are not very diverse, but there is a certain amount of generational difference and some d iversity of thought among policy makers. It was also pointed out that a recent audit of the personnel policy was undertaken by a group that was diverse in terms ofrace and sexual orientation. Inclusion of Staff in Policy Development A key differentiator between diversity and inclusion is that inclusion actively draws upon the diverse backgrounds of present stakeholders-including staff-in the development of policies and practices. About half of CMF's staff feel that they are included or their voices are part of the policy development process, while the other ha lf does not feel involved in the process but would feel comfortable voicing their opinions and needs if they thought it were necessary. Further, there was very little mention of policy being overly top-down or of staff members' worrying of repercussions should they recommend policy change, suggesting the environment nurtures the inclusion of board and staff. 7 �Policy Review- CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative Diversity Efforts as Organizational Change An institution's effort to d iversify its staff and board and/or to become more culturally competent can be considered a type of organ izational change. A review of the literature suggests that among the many facets of an organization that can affect organizationa l change, two of the most critical are: 1. L ea d er ship - Effective organizational change is driven from the top-down. The leader of the institution 1 must be dedicated to the change and inspi re the rest of the staff to join in the effort • 2. O r ga n ization a l C ult u re - The definition of organizational culture is somewhat broad, encompassing the many factors which can influence how it develops in different institutions. Generally, o rganizational cul ture consists of a variety of influences deemed relevant and given meaning by the organization, includ ing symbols (words a nd objects), heroes and heroines (people who characterize the insti tution's 2 mission and goals), rituals wh ich fulfill a particular role within the organization, and unspoken values • The interviews of staff and board members did not deal d irectly with leadership and cu lture. These themes did, however, arise during the course of the interviews. Leadership Policies are inextricably related to leadership. A leader may d irect an organization's work by setting policy, while at the same time being beholden to the same body of policies. Components of leadership and its relationship to policies were a theme in the interviews. There was some mention of inequity in the implementation of policies or ad hoc decisions made which are perceived as preferential treatment, which may stem from the aforementioned relatively small scale of CMF's policies. While interviewees cited this small quantity of policies as beneficial for increased flexib ility, they also mentioned that limited policies or inconsistent implementation thereof can affect team unity. Interviewees also discussed communication. It is perceived by some interviewed that CMF's various leaders have different communication and overall leadership styles. These differences-especially in a small organization-can be confusing to stakeholders and impair unity. This communication carries over to CMF ' s Transforming M ichigan P h ilanthropy through D iversi ty and Inclusion Ini tiative. While some interviewees offered praise for the leadership of this initiative, others were confused, citing a lack of c larity in the communication of what these efforts mean, especiall y to the day-to-day operations of CMF. Leadership needs to be sure that they tru ly und erstand diversity and can clearly explain this to staff and board members. Finally, there were some mentions about the d iversity of the leadership itself. Some interviewees stated that th ey would appreciate a more diverse leadership, would like to continue to bring diverse youths' voices into CMF, and/or would like to develop a p ipeline to help you ng stakeholders move up into leadership positions. Organizational Culture The literature suggests that an organization must have a unified cu lture if it is to move forward and undertake organizational change. The leader should be able to enhance cultural e lements which are conducive to the desired change and minimize those which detract from the goal. W hile the interviews focused upon policy a nd diversity, it was c lear that interviewees did not share a common culture. There are three main factors creating factions among staff and board members. First, C MF has two maj or offices (in G rand Haven and Detroit). Interviewees noted the difficulty of maintaini ng a sense of unity w ith two offices which interact minimally and have mi nimal duplication in job ro le. Second, w ithin each of these offices there are strong, separate a llegiances along ro le, generation, and p hysical location lines. Third, there is a pervasive sense of internal and external staff. Internal staff takes care of the day-to -day operations of CMF but have little interaction with the Board or members. External staff mem bers, on the o ther hand, are very focused upon the Board and membership. The perpetuation of these two d istinct foci hamper the unification of stakeholders needed to undertake an effort to increase d iversity, inclusion , and cu ltural competency. 1 Lakomski, G. (200 I). Organizational change, leadership, and learning: culture as cognitive process. The International Journal of Educational Management. 15(2), 68-77. 2 Waters, L V. (2004). Cultivate corporate culture and diversity. Nursing Management. 35(1), 36-37, 50. 8 �Policy Review- CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative The Role of Policy in CMF's Transforming Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative The ultimate question for this research must be: how well do CMF's policies set the organization up for success in the Transforming Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative? CMF's policies are limited in scale-a quality which several interviewees identify as being critical to the organization's nimbleness. This a lso means that many of the organization's stances are manifest in practice rather than in policy. Whi le organizations can effectively balance policy and practice in many ways, if practices are not standardized using policies, the organization must be sure that practices are aligned using some other mechanism. As mentioned above, a lack of standard practices can lead to perceived inequity and, ultimately, can hamper organizational cultural unity. Therefore, as CMF focuses upon an ambitious initiative such as Transforming Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion, which requires cultural unity, it may be advisable to be certain that all policies and practices are executed in a standardized manner. In addition to uniting the organization's culture in general, CMF must also be sure that this culture is supportive of the organization' s diversity and inclusion efforts. Organizational change to build an exemplarily diverse and inclusive organization will be best served through a process that is transparently diverse and inclusive. To facilitate this, CMF should be sure to include staff and board members in developing its d iversi ty and inclusion efforts and communicate clearly where the organization is in the development-implementation-completion continuum. This process will insure the highest level of organ izational stakeholder and constituent buy-in. Some interviewees noted that as CMF undertakes the Transforming Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative the organization has an opportunity to model best practice by increasing internal diversity. They recommended seizing that opportunity. Some asked how CMF would be able to promote diversity externally when the organization is not internally diverse and incl usive. Efforts are definitely being made to increase diversity and inclusion CMF's staff and board, but nearly all in terviewees ci teclthe organization's heaclcp!arters' location (G rancl Haven) as a roaclhlock to increasecl in ternal diversity . These assertions are not unfounded. The 2000 United States Census data show that 4.8% of the population of Grand Haven, and the four surrounding townships (Crockery, Grand Haven, Robinson, and Spring Lake Townships) are persons of color. The number of persons of color age 25 and over with a Bache lor's Degree or higher in that region in 2000 was approximately 250. Regardless of these low numbers, CMF must not allow Grand Haven's demographics to prevent the hiring of future diverse staff members. Successfully uti lizing satellite offices or relocating the office would be two potential solutions to work around Grand Haven's relative homogene ity. 9 �Policy Review- CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative Appendix 1: List of Resources The Annie E. Casey Foundation. (n.d.). Race matters: Organizational Self-Assessment. Baltimore: The Annie E. Casey Foundation. Brown, W.A. "Inclusive Governance Practices in Nonprofit Organizations and Implications for Practice". Nonprofit Management and Leadership 12(4), Wiley Periodical2002, 369-385. Burbidge, L. C., Diaz, W. A., Odendahl, T., & Shaw, A. (2002). The Meaning and Impact ofBoard and Staff· Diversity in the Philanthropic Field. Joint Affinity Groups. Daley, J. M. (2002). "An action guide for nonprofit board diversity". Journal ofCommunily Practice, 10(1), 33. The Denver Foundation (2003). Inside Inclusiveness: Race, Ethnicity and Nonprofit Organizations. Denver: The Denver Foundation. Marquis, J.P., Lim, N., Scott, L. M., Harrell, M. C., & Kava naugh, J. (2008). Managing Diversity in Corporate America: An Exploratory Analysis. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. Pless, N. M. & Mack, T. (2004). Building an Inclusive Diversity Culture: Principles, Processes and Practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 129-147. Pond, A. (2008). The Business Case for Diversity in Health Care Interviews with Health Care Executives on Behalf ofthe California Endowment. Thomas, D. A. & Ely, R. J. (1996). Making Differences Matter: A New Paradigm for Managing D iversity. Harvard Business Review. September-October, 79-90. Whatcom Council ofNonprofits. (n.d.). Best Practices for Executive Directors and Boards of Nonprofit Organizations. Bellingham, W A : Whatcom Council ofNonprofits. The following internal documents: The Center for Effective Philanthropy- Diversity and Inclusiveness Policy NYRAG - Best Practices & Resources United Way Capital Area- Inclusiveness Policy Heart of West M ichigan United Way- Diversity Policy Kalamazoo Community Foundation - Diversi ty Policy Kalamazoo Community Foundation- Inclusiveness Statements Surdna Foundation: Resources: Inclusiveness and D iversity Diversity - The San Francisco Foundation Contacts made to find further resources: - Alliance for Nonprofit Management's Cultural Competency Institute - Renee Branch -The Denver Foundation - Gardenswartz and Rowe - Larry McGill -Minnesota Council on Foundations -Nationa l Network of Consultants to Grantmakers 10 �Policy Review- CMF's T ransforming Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative Appendix II: Rubric for Reviewing Policies £ :g ~ <>., g_l! <~ Aspect of Policy ~ 0. § ~ .I> < i .... 0 """ i i < < 1]~ .:!: <>., ~§ .... 0 00 » ll) ~ ~~ .5 ~ -2 0 -I 0 -I -2 0 0 0 -I -I -I -2 -2 -2 0 -I -2 0 0 -I -I -2 -2 0 0 -I -I -2 -2 The nre;Jlninlfinn lnoks In rtiverse cnnslilucnl '- :mrt vnlunlecrs for pnlenlilll St:lffmem hers. 0 -I -2 Diversity is emphasized in the o rganization's: Staff Exte rnal Stakeholders (C lients, grantees, members, beneficiaries, etc.) Committees/subcommittees 0 0 0 -I -I -I -2 -2 -2 Diversity is cornerstone to progr.1m development- sensitive to the diverse needs of diverse •roups. The organization is actively responsive to cultural differences in the community. Diversity is emphasized in the organization 's: Consultants/panelists/speakers/presenters Vendors Resources and communicat ion materials Financial investments 0 0 -I -I -2 -2 0 0 0 0 -I -I -I -I -2 -2 -2 -2 The organizat ion incorporates diversity into its internal and external communication tools. The organizatio n provides learning opportunities fo r the community regarding diversity The o rganizatio n's stance on diversity is publicized. and the community is e n 'aged in discourse on diversity. The organization engages di verse g roups within the Jar 'er community to understand how the or ·, anization 's work impacts and is relevant to each •roup. The o rganizatio n seeks partnerships and collabor.1tions to reinfo rce its diversity focus and to e ncour.1ge that focus in partners. 0 0 0 0 0 -I -I -I -I -I -2 -2 -2 -2 -2 The or •anization has a diversity advisory committee Diversity efforts are measured and monitored 0 0 -I -I -2 -2 Diversity is treated as a ho listic process included in many facets of the or •anization's policies rather than as a separate pro •ram. Diversity is treated as going beyond the presence of persons from various demographic groups to the appreciation of differences as a means to promote new, creative insi •hts. Participation and communication are viewed as essential to diversity/inclusivity. V isions of diversity/inclusion are specified. Example: zero tolerance of hate/harassment. Diversity is recognized within d iverse groups. Example: socio-economic differences exist within specific rac ial groups Diversity is seen as a top-down phenomenon with emphasis placed on board recm iting, training, and retention. Board diversity emphasizes diverse skillsets and backgrounds in addition to diverse demog raphics. The organization looks to diverse constituents and volunteers for potential board members. Diversity is emphasized in the organization's board. Diversity is fully integrated into recm itment, retention, advancement, development, and all other aspects of human resource management. Human resource po licies are balanc<..>d emphasizing rec ruitment, retention, and advancement equally. II �Policy Review- CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative Appendix Ill: Interview Questions I. How familiar are you w ith the organization's written policies? a. 2. What steps does the organization take to make policies accessible? In what ways does the organization successfully create a culture and env ironment that embraces diversity? a. Are these successes rooted in the organization's policies? 3. In what ways does the organization fall short of creating a culture and environment that embraces diversity? 4. Who is involved in developing the organization's policies? a. How diverse is this group of policy makers? 5. How included do you feel your voice is in the policy development process? 6. Do you know the organization's policies that are specifically related to d iversity? 7. How well does the organization communicate its d iversi ty policies to staff members? 8. Does the organization facilitate the interaction of diverse sta keholders? H ow? a. 9. Are these methods incorporated in the organization's policies? Do the o rganization's policies a llow it the flexibility to evolve with the needs of a diverse and dynamic community? 12 �Policy Review- CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative Appendix IV: Literature Review of Organizational Culture, Organizational Change, and Diversity Diversity and organizational culture play crucial roles in the functioning of an organization. Organizational culture helps define the way an institution accomplishes its goals based on typically unspoken rules and regulations. The degree to which a culture embraces diversity can determine how effective an organization is-not only within its own premises, but a lso beyond its doors and in the community. M ishandling the issue of diversity can potentially stifle institutional growth. Stratification of individuals based on social and economic status happens within the larger society and is equally possible in organizations. This prevents individuals at various levels within an organization from actively contributing, thereby inhibiting potential institutional growth. T he presence of stratification or the lack of true diversity w ithin an organization calls for change. Organizational culture and diversity play important ro les in organizational change, which is often necessary if an institution is to run as efficiently and efficaciously as possible. This literature review attempts to explore all of these aspects of organizational life in g reater depth, to he lp achieve a better understanding of culture, diversity, change, and-ultimately-the inseparability of these crucial factors in organizational functionality. Organizational Culture The culture of an organization defines the way staff and stakeholders interact and the way business is done. Even when the existence of a culture is not clearly acknowledged, it still has a large impact on organizational life (Alvesson, 2002). T he definition of organizational culture is somewhat broad, encompassing the many factors which can influence how it develops in different institutions. Generally, organizational culture consists of a variety of influences deemed relevant and given meaning by the organization, including symbols (words and objects), heroes and heroines (people who characterize the institution's mission and goals), rituals which fulfill a particular role within the organization, and unspoken values (Waters, 2004). Organizational culture is also strongly influenced by the personal cultures of the individuals who make up the organization (Waters, 2004). The factors influencing a culture stretch beyond those already mentioned. Cultures are heavily defined by the society in w hich they exist, as outside norms, values, and even current events can help shape the functioning of an o rganization (Collins, 1998). For this reason, organizational cultures are always changing and adapting in response to different c ircumstances and in differing settings (Waters, 2004). This evolution and flexibility are v ital in ensuring an organization's ability to be effective and accomplish the goals it strives to achie ve. This adaptability can also help promote diversity. Diversity is a very important part of the functioning of an organization, and can lead to great progress and change. Diversity There are many benefits to embracing diversity within an organization. In this context, diversity refers to both racial/ethnic diversity and also diversity of ideas and backgrounds (though certain scenarios may emphasize one over the other). No matter what the situation, diversity opens many doors for an organization and helps it to have a larger and more powerful voice within the community. It is important for all organizations-especially ones with g lobal constituencies-to embrace cultural and subcultural differences (Waters, 2004). In the process of diversifying an organization, it may well be found that there is a common shared value system among its members, and putting these values into practice can help an organization create its own unique multicultural identity and unified organizational culture (Waters, 2004). Diversifying can help an institution find its own niche withi n the community and create an identity by wh ich community members will be sure to remember it. Diverse individuals within an organization bring differing perspectives because of their unique experiences and insights, which p lay a key role in decision-making and the progress of an organization (Wilson, 1994). Groups with diverse members, as well as groups in which a variety of different ideas and opinions are expressed, tend to exhibit more creativity than average (Leung, Maddux, Galinsky & Chiu, 2008), and managers make better decisions and have better ideas when their colleagues are more diverse (Allen & Montgomery, 200 I). Diversity challenges organizations and helps them make necessary and important changes in the way they function. 13 �Policy Review- CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative The impacts of diversity stretch well beyond an organization itself and can impact a w ide variety of people outside the boundaries of an organization. The creative brainstorming, ideas, and contributions w hich arise through d iversity can help lead to improved and more effective policies which address the needs of a diverse population (Wilson, 1994). An organization may find itself w ith more clients or beneficiaries if it diversifies, since diversity of group members can help an organization learn how to appeal to a more diverse populace (Allen & Montgomery, 200 I ). Sometimes the change brought about in an organization due to diversity can lead to certain tensions; there may be resistance to new ideas which have never been shared before. It is important to incorporate acceptance of change into an organization's culture and move beyond an "either/or" or " right versus wrong" approach for looking at ideas. Instead, organizations should view diverse ideas constructively and collectively, wor king together to promote change (Bond, 1999). Organizational Change Organizational change is a necessary process that must take place in order for an organization to continue functioning efficiently with the passing of time. External environmental forces and issues may incite change. T he culture of an institution itself may be in need of restructuring, or its very nature may help encourage the rebuilding of an organization to occur. E ither way, change is a necessary part of the equation, and it is important to understand context in order to understand how change occurs and to know the best way to go about effecting change. Sometimes the underly ing symbols of an organization's culture can be examined and used in ways which promote o rganizational change (Aivesson, 2002). It is important to look at the relationship between organizational culture and performance, especially in terms of how th is relates to performance in individuals (Alvesson , 2002). After all, a c learly defined culture helps bring a group together to work towards common goals, stimulating individuals to feel more motivation to contribute to the organization (Aivesson, 2002). When one feels like s/he has a place within her/his organization, one is more likely to work for improvement and change. Individuals take more pride in their work when they have a voice w ithin their organization, and they will be driven to help the institution grow. An organizational culture that promotes teamwork and also gives its staff room for individuality, will not only enhance performance but also make individuals more willing to adapt to change, as well as create it. The same rules which app ly to understanding group member interactions in the context of culture also apply to understanding leadership. To truly understand how managers w ithin an organization lead and w hy they manage the way they do, it is critical to examine this relationship within a particular cultural context (Alvesson, 2002). Not every leadership style is the same, and it is usually strongly influenced by an organization's culture. Some cultures are more conducive to change than o thers, but the level of change that occurs often lies in the hands of those actually leading an organization. The relationship between culture and organization members' interactions can help explain why an organization changes o r is s low to change and can also help suggest effective ways to help promote change. In striving to achieve organizational change, a common m istake is often made. Rather than attempting to change an organization itself, leaders often attempt to change individuals within the organization instead. This over-simplifies a rather complicated issue, as it is the interrelationships and interactions between group members-in addition to aspects of individual behavior-which need closer examination (Katz & Kahn, 1966). The norms (i.e. the culture) which regulate the interactions within an o rganization should be targeted, since these make the system run as it does (Burke, 2002). Undertaking organizational change may be pointless if members of the institution with the most power are not attempting to change their own methods, as well as the workings of the organization itself. The process of change does not lie in the hands of the employees at the bottom of the power ladder but predominantly in the hands of management. Leadership and Change Organization leaders play a crucial role in organizational change. They often accomplish goals and create change by using an organization's culture to help shape the beliefs and behaviors of their subordinates (Lakomski, 2001 ). In spite of these methods, it is important for managers to be aware that they cannot control organizational c ulture because it is created, to a large extent, by individual employees who bring their own ideas, values, beliefs, and identities to the organization (Collins, 1998). This re-emphasizes how important it is to use the strong points of an organization's culture to push for change. Therefore, the leader's ab ility to understand the culture, the aspects 14 �Policy Review- CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative thereof that can be changed, and the aspects thereof which can be enhanced to encourage change is vital to successfully undertake organizational change. The type of culture a leader encourages and supports is an important determinant of how much change will occur within an organization. Organizations in which avoidance of conflict is encouraged (a unitarist frame of reference) and managers s imply communicate m les and objectives are likely to experience little change (Collins, 1998). Conversely, organizations with management that deals directly with conflict (a pluralist frame of reference) experience cooperative communication between all group members and are more like ly to experience productivity and change (Collins, 1998). A pluralist frame of reference is the most conducive to honest and d irect communication between organization members, giving them an opportunity to give feedback and honest opinions in relation to how an institution is running. This is clearly a useful frame of reference to incorporate into the culture of any organization that is looking to improve and grow. Another very important management practice is the acknowledgement of leadership's personal biases. Managers who recognize their biases towards certain groups of people can help prevent discriminatory behavior aimed at these groups (Wilson, 1994). Leaders hold a great deal of power in shaping an organization's culture. Leaders who conscientiously use their positions within their institutions will be able to shape and help create organizational cultures which are open and conducive to change. Organizational Culture and Organizational Change There are three major aspects of organizational culture w h ich can help lead to organizational change: the ab ility to adapt, members' willingness to adopt new behaviors and mindsets, and goal sharing/team building among group members. Adaptation is a particularly important aspect of organizational culture . A good organization is able to adapt to internal and external threats and opportunities, which not only helps performance but also shows a strong bond and a certain level of trust among organizational members (Aivesson, 2002). An organization that is ab le to adapt through changes is very likely to succeed in the dynamic world. In the context of group interactions throughout all levels of an organization, it is sometimes necessary to make certain small changes within individuals to help the institution be more effective. When this is done, applicable behaviors must be targeted for change. As individuals fo llow through with these behaviors, they will begin to understand the logic behind them and w ill adopt the rationale needed to justify their actions, thus influencing the ir willingness to work for the benefit of an institution (Burke, 2002). This process involves internalization of an institution's goals, wh ich is a much more effective route to organizational change than telling individuals how to think before explaining how they are expected to act (Burke, 2002). Internalization of institutional goals is one of the surest ways to produce organizational change. Change is more likely to occur not only when group members share at least one common goal, but also when they participate in team-building activ ities (Burke, 2002). This solidifies the bond among team members knowing that they are all striving to accomplish the same ends. lnclusivity and Organizational Change There is yet another very critical point to achieving long-lasting organizational change. Including a ll team members (specifically those at the bottom of the power ladder) in the process of organizational change can lead them to be less resistant to change, give them a feel ing of purpose, and help them to be more effective in their work (Burke, 2002). The implications are that giving all team members a share in the institution boosts their morale not only because they feel like they matter to their superiors but also because they feel like the organization is in a sense "theirs". Giving group members ownership of their workplace to the extent that they can participate in ma king important decisions can also be good for the institution because employees can provide a diverse array of ideas which may have never arisen otherwise. This is a win-win situation for both the organization and its employees. The Role of Diversity and Inclusion in Organizational Culture and Change While d iversi ty is a very important aspect of organizational culture, it is o ften mishandled by management. In an attempt to appear nond iscriminatory, management often ignores d iversity, which can do more harm than good. In an attempt to avoid "seeing" race and gender (thus appearing unprejudiced), there is a press for sameness, and this approach in itself is one practiced and imposed by the dom inant culture (Bond, 1999). This can stifle creativity 15 �Policy Review- CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative among organization members, thus harming the progress of an institution (Bond, 1999). Unintentional discrimination could even occur in the attempt to appear "neutral"; prejudiced attitudes need not be present (Bond, 1999). Embracing diversity rather than ignoring it can lead to many benefits for an organization. Including d iverse groups in work activities and problem-solving can give employees a sense of belonging and participation, thus increasing the productivity of an organization, reiterating the aforementioned point on morale (Wilson, 1994). Boosting morale in diverse groups through inclusion can make an organization more productive and more accessible to a diverse population outside of the organization. For all of these reasons, it is very beneficial to embrace, rather than ignore, diversity w ithin an organization. Still, diversity programs rarely produce the intended results (Allen & Montgomery, 200 I). They may urge institutions to give more opportunities to minori ties, but to truly be effective and promote diversity, organizations must make serious changes to aspects of the culture which inhibit the recognition of diversity (Allen & Montgomery, 200 I). The overwhelm ing focus on trying to do what is perceived to be the right thing rather than attempti ng to truly include traditionally underrepresented voices can lead to a breakdown in communication, and therefore, fai lure to achieve the goal of true equality (Bond, 1999). This is good for nei ther the organization nor its members. Stratification based on social and economic class is just one more way in which organizations fall short of true diversity and inclusion. Stratification deters certain groups of people from having the same opportunities as those belonging to a group holding more power socially or economically. Women and racia l m inorities are particularly vulnerable as they are more likely to be placed in entry-level and lower midlevel positions in a workplace (Bond, 1999). Differences of opportunity exist at a ll levels w ithin organizations, especially at the top (Bond, 1999). It is much more competitively difficult to attain a position at the top of an organization, and such positions are usually reserved for those who hold more social and economic power. This kind of stratification may also be more e vident in some countries than others. Some societies (such as the U.S.) which show higher power distance tend to have organizations which practice this same cultural "value" and o perate in a rather authoritarian manner (Collins, 1998). This illustrates how culture outside of an organization can influence organizational culture, but these influences c learly are not always positive ones. Such stratification can place barriers between group members, thus preventing wh ite-collar workers from associating w ith lower prestige workers to avoid the appearance of lowering their status, while those with less prestige avoid commu nication with white-collar workers so they do not appear to make the assumption they have equal status (Katz & Kahn, 1966). All in all, this not only produces tension between group members, but it also greatly reduces the productivity of an organization through failure to promote open communication between all individuals regardless of social and economic status. In the process of fai ling to be inclusive by s ilencing the voices of certain organization members based on their status, an institution is really fai ling at promoting diver sity. The variety of ideas and insights which could be provided by those coming from d iffering backgrounds is a large part of what makes an organization d iverse. Silencing the voices of certain employees hinders the mission of an institution. Fortunately, if organizations make a serious attempt to get at the root of the culture enough to change the detrimenta l aspects, serious progress can be made. Recognizing how stratification works within an organization can lead to change that w ill not only positively impact individuals but the organization as well. In attempting to eliminate the culture of stratification w ithin an organization, it is crucial to examine the vertical dimension ( i.e. the hierarchy based on based on power, privilege, prestige, and rewards), rather than the horizontal dimension, w hich refers to the flow of work in one particular area of an organization (Katz & Kahn, 1966). In doing so, change can occur at all levels of an organization rather than just one. Along with the stratification of employees within an organization, sometimes employees also feel demeaned by the labels given to different organization members. For example, the labels of"management" versus "general employees" can decrease the self-worth of those with lower prestige in an organization, dimin ishing their sense of ownership and willingness to actively participate in the organization (Reynolds & Platow, 2003). There are ways to give employees more power within an organization, thereby helping them feel more motiva ted. All employees, no matter what level of prestige they hold, should be given decision-making powers in order to help them internalize the goals of the institution, thus making them more efficacious and helping the organization grow (Reynolds & Platow, 2003). In addition to this, it is especially important to show employees that their positions are based on achievement rather than ascription; if this is not accomplished, then it is difficult for employees wi th lower 16 �Policy Review- CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative status in an organization to share the same interests as their superiors, and thus, they have trouble internalizing the goals of the organization (Katz & Kahn, 1966). This is understandable from the point of v iew of an employee who feels s/he is at the bottom of the power ladder. Ifs/he feels as if it is impossible to move up this ladder, why would s/he want to bother trying to perform to her/his full capacity? Among other methods, one particular method stands out as being one of the best to provide organizational change: peer groups. Peer groups allow group members to observe interactions and behavior among others of their own status w ithout management's imposition, making it easier to find solutions and achieve real change (Katz & Kahn, 1966). This also provides a much more comfortable environment in which the organization can change. Conclusion All of the research makes it clear that for the most effective organizational change to occur, management must take the reins and create change starting from the top and moving downwards. O ne particular example given by Mats Alvesson (2002) illustrates this point: the founder of IBM was walking through an IBM plant with a few managers, and a subordinate told him to follow safety rules. The managers were about to reprimand her for telling the founder what to do, but the founder told them to let it go, that he should have to follow the rules just like everyone else. This example shows how the mindset and behavior of someone who holds a large amount of power within an organization can influence policies and the way every day interactions are carried out, while empowering those in lower in the hierarchy. Organizational and cultural changes truly start w ith organizations' leaders. The link between organizational culture, diversity, and change is almost inseparable, and often cyclical. The culture of an organization can determine the likelihood of change to occur, how it will occur, and what aspects of the organization wi ll change. Change is necessary in order to keep an organization up to date w ith recent events and to keep it running efficiently. Diversity is integral to organizational culture because it helps foster openness, and creates a vaster pool from which to draw a variety of ideas. Being open to diversity means accepting and acknowledging group members from all backgrounds, including economic and social classes. An organization's culture, especially one that encourages diversity, can contribute to growth and change within an organization. Diversity leads to organizational change by bringing in a variety of backgrounds and thus, a variety of experiences and ideas. It helps shape an organization's culture. In turn, organizational culture and change can also impact diversity. Through the encouragement o f openness, acceptance, and inclusion among members of an institution, organizational change occurs, and d iversity is promoted. When speaking of organizational culture, change, and d iversity, it is difficult to make reference to one of these variables without some combination of intluence(s) from the others. 17 �Policy Review - CMF's Transfom1ing Michigan Philanthropy through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative References Allen, R.S., & Montgomery, K.A. (200 I). Applying an organizational development approach to creating diversity. Organizational Dy namics. 30(2), 149- 161. Alvesson, Mats (2002). Understanding organizational culture. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd. Bond, M.A. ( 1999). Gender, race, and class in organizational contexts. American Journal of Community Psychology. 27(3), 327-355. Burke, W.W. (2002). Organization change: The01y and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Ltd. Collins, D. ( 1998). Organizational change: Sociological perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge. Katz, D., & Kahn, R.L. (1966). The social psychology oforganizations. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Lakomski, G. (200 I). Organizational change, leadership, and learning: culture as cognitive process. The International Journal ofEducational Management. 15 (2), 68-77. Leung, A.K., Maddux, W.W., Galinsky, A.D., & Chiu, C. (2008). Multicultural experience enhances creativity: the when and how. American Psycholog ist, 63(3), 169-18 1. Reynolds, K. J., & Platow, M. J. (2003). On the social psychology of power and powerlessness: Social power as a symptom of organizational division. InS. A. Haslam D. Van Knippenberg, M. J. Platow, & N. Ellemers (Eds.), Social identity at work: Developing theory for organizational practice. Hove, Great Britain: Psychology Press, Ltd. Waters, L.V. (2004). Cultivate corporate culture and diversity. Nursing Management. 35(1), 36-37, 50. Wilson, P.A. ( 1994). Cultural diversity: an organizational asset. The Public Manager. 23(3), 27-30. 18 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2009_BB_2009-02-24_Diversity-and-Inclusion-Policy-Review Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book diversity and inclusion policy review Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book diversity and inclusion policy review. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50757 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2009-02-24 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/46686e3866252e1d1239412c809a31a7.pdf 0c01a2d16bc5737cbf2b6c5e4fc110fd PDF Text Text CMF Council of Michigan Founaations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. February 13, 2009 Memo to: Melonie B. Colaianne, Chairperson Members of the Board of Trustees From: Kimberly Burton, Vice President, Corporate Services and Director of Diversity and Inclusive Practices cc: Caroline Chambers, Chairperson, Corporate Committee Re: Proposed 2009/2010 Corporate Committee Work Plan Goal: To provide resources to CMF Corporate Members that support CMF recruitment and retention goals by enhancing current involvement with SE Michigan members formed as the Business Contributions Council (BCC), and bridging connections to enhance outreach among corporate members and prospects in all parts of the State. Objectives: I. Provide Resources to Corporate Foundation Members • Establish Bi-Monthly Meetings for CMF/BCC members in a more Central location. (Identify relevant topics and appropriate presenters/speakers) • Create Communication Resources and Information Services for Corporate Members 1. Conduct Training Assessment Survey of current corporate members and need for additional training in the field of philanthropy. 2. Conduct annual charitable contribution plan/program survey. 3. Create Corporate ListServe to enhance communication and information sharing. 4. Create web-based on-demand survey results. II. • Promote Corporate Participation at CMF Annual Conference 1. Partner with I.S. (Independent Sector) on Corporate networking opportunity • Host One Day Corporate Conference and/or Network Opportunity (20 10) Retain Current Corporate Foundation Members • Establish partnership between CMF and Detroit Renaissance by providing resources to enhance experience of Business Contributions Council (DR Members) • CMF to invite BCC members to participate in ongoing and new programming opportunities; (DAG, CMF Webinars, Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship) • Expand CMF/BCC membership to include Corporate Foundations from Western and Central Michigan. �Corporate Committee Report February 2009 Page 2 • • III. Access to CMF Foundation Liaison; V.P. Corporate Services Conduct Member N eeds Assessment Survey Recruit New Corporate Giving Programs to Become CMF Members Conduct Research to Establish Recruitment Goals Within the State (Benchmark peer associations corporate member ratios; Identify number of Fortune 1000 companies in state and evaluate current giving outreach, etc.) • Outreach to Non-members on the Benefits of Membership through Current Member Call Plan and/or other method regarding benefits of Advocacy, Networking, Education/Knowledge, News and Information; Partnership with Small Business Association of Michigan (SBAM) Resources and Research. • CMF Colleague "Member Retention Call to Action - Contact corporate members who have discontinued their membership. Phone Calls; E-mails; ENews; Websites • Next Steps: • • • • Meeting with Detroit Renaissance/BCC to propose a work plan for SE MI (Late February I Early March) Research and Data Gathering to present at first meeting (Q 1) Communication to all current and prospective Corporate members regarding meeting plan and Invitation to Kick Off Meeting- central location (Q2) o Presentation of first round of benchmark resources Active engagement in CMF/IS joint conference plan (Begin Q2) Key Resource Partners • Detroit Renaissance • Boston College Center for Corporate Citizenship • The Conference Board • Other Regional Associations of Grantmakers � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2009_BB_2009-02-24_Corporate-Committee Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book corporate committee Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book corporate committee. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50756 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2009-02-24 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/904b071f36dfd10563e5e1a9a583a7fc.pdf ba3121fdb7ac5052e91533164a52c6f5 PDF Text Text CMF Council of Michigan Founcfations Serving grontmc*ers. A:lvonciflg giving. February 15, 2009 Memo to: Melonie Colaianne, Chairperson, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Rob Collier, President Re: 371h Annua l Conference Update - Integration with IS Attached is the latest DRAFT of the Memorandum of Understand ing (MOU) with Independent Sector (IS) on integration of our 3 71h Annual Conference with their Annual Conference on Wednesday, November 4 to Friday, November 6, 2009. I hope, with Melanie's approval as noted in the Minutes of the Executive Committee Meeting, to sign this MOU before the Board Meeting in order to keep the process moving. Given the economy and Michigan's history and current status with IS, this is the time to try th is new collaboration. CMF will fonn a small Conference committee to focus on the following responsibilities: A Michigan Themed Plenary just for Michigan grantmakers on Wednesday, November 4 from I I :00 a.m. to I :00 p.m. Development of 9 concurrent sessions focusing on grantmakers- family foundations, community foundations, investment issues, etc. Development of six issue based site sessions for Thursday aftemoon between 2:30 and .5:30p.m. Development of one workshop for experienced gra ntmakers on Th ursday aftemoon - most likely in partnersh ip with GrantCraft Managing the Host event at the Detroit Institute of Arts on Wednesday evening, November 4, and Conducting our Annual Members Meeting Thursday moming at breakfast. In addition, 5 CMF members and 4 Michigan Nonprofit Leaders, plus me, are on the IS Program Committee, and 6 CMF members plus me are on the IS Host Committee, so there is great opportunity for collaboration on all fronts. I attended the IS {Program Committee Meeting on February 13 and reinforced the need for sessions on communications and diversity and incl usion - to name just two of our mutual priorities. The Host Committee still needs to raise $ 150,000 as Michigan's share and CMF must raise $IOO,OOO for our core budget, so I am grateful and fortunate to have Dave Lindberg and Kathy Ginocchio's help in keeping a c lose eye on the numbers. Through this collaboration, I am hopefu l that we will add more value for CMF members as well as help IS attract more grantmakers to its Annual Conference. Whi le the Opening and Closing Plenaries are still being developed by IS, I will confirm that an invitation has been sent to President Obama to join us all in Detroit. I look forward to responding to any questions you may have at the Board Meeting. �CMF Council of Michigan Fou ncfat ions Serving grantmaket$. AdM:Jncing giving. INDEPENDENT SECT OR A vir~ I voirP (()r 11' ::~1 MEMO RAN DUM OF UN DERSTAN DI NG Between Independent Sect or a nd Council of Michigan Foundations For Condu cting a Joint Co nferen ce February 13, 2009 It is the intention of Independent Sector (IS) and the Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF) to collaborate in bringing together their annual conferences for a jointly held gathering in 2009. This memo outlines the understanding of both orga nizations in relation to the roles and responsibilities of each in o rganizing, promoting, and financing the conference. DATE: November 4, 2009 to November 6, 2009 LOCATION: Detroit, Michigan PRIMA Y VENUE: Marriott Renaissance Hotel The J oint Confer ence IS and CMF agree that collaboration on the 2009 conference offers several benefits to our members and to the organizations. These include, but are not limited to: o Participants and potential sponsors of both organizations benefit from a single con ference registration fee. o Participants of both organizations benefit from the opportunity to interact with leaders they might not otherwise meet. o Participants of both organizations benefit from the programmatic experi ence of two organ izations. o IS benefits from the depth of reach and the reputation of the CMF in Michigan. o CMF benefits from the broad national reach and reputation of IS. o IS benefits from CMF's co nnection to local vendors, wh ich may help to reduce conference expenses, and IS has relationships with national vendors. As outlined in this memo, in some cases IS will "take the lead" in organizing activities and in some cases CMF wi ll " take the lead." When this language is used, it refers to which organization will have respo nsibility for initiating, maintaining the timeli ne for and overseeing details for any particular set of activities. �"In coordination with" refers to the expectation that wh ichever organization is initiating an activity, that organization wi ll communicate with and seek feedback from the other partnering organization. The conference will be referred to onsite and in all onsite materials as the 2009 Independent Sector & Council of Michigan Foundations Annual Conference. This wi ll be the language featured on on-site conference supplies including tote bags, signs, the program book, bio book and lanyards, etc. Both logos will appear on all materials. All conference registrants will have access to all open sessions, whether organized by IS or CMF- this includes plenary sessions, off-site sessions and break out sessions, except for the following: o The CEO Track is open to heads of member organizations of IS. There will be a cap of 40 participants for each regu lar CEO session, which will be marketed first to IS members (including those with joint IS I CMF membership). 10 seats in each session will be reserved for CMF members. All CEO sessio n registration is on a first-come basis. The CEO Summit will be fully open to all CEOs of IS and CMF members. o IS invitation only events include the President's reception and a special reception in honor of the Gard ner awardee. o CMF invitation only events: CMF Wednesday Plenary Lunch, Reception for Fo rum of African Americans in Philanthropy, CMF Board meeting & CMF Advisory cabinet meeting Program Development Attachment B shows an outline of the preliminary program schedule as of Jan. 28, 2009 The plenary sessions for the joint conference will be as follows: o Opening plenary on Wed nesday, November 4; beginning at I :30 pm o Conversation with a Sector Leader, on Thursday, November 5 o Luncheon plenary, on Thursday, November 5 o Awards dinner, on Thursday, November 5 o Closing plenary, on Friday, November 6 With input from CMF, IS will take the lead in developing conference plenary sessions. IS will seek input from CMF and keep CMF infom1ed of the overall design of plenary sessions but reserves the right to make the final decision on topics and plenary speakers. CMF leadership will have a ro le in the official opening and closing of the conference. There will be 5 time periods for break out sessions. o IS will take the lead in organizing 25 sessions which includes CEO sessions and Future Labs. �o CMF will take the lead in organizing 9 sessions, I workshop and 6 off-site sessions. The preliminary schedule of breakout sessions is as follows: IS Sessions Wed. PM Thurs. AM Thurs. PM I Thurs. PM 2 Fri. AM 3 3 2 3 2 Breakouts; 2 CEO; I Future Lab Breakouts; CEO Summit; I Future Lab Breakouts; 2 CEO; I Future Lab Breakouts; I CEO; I Future Lab Breakouts; I CEO; I Future Lab C M F Sessions 3 Breakouts 3 Breakouts 6 Off Site Cont inued 6 Off-Site 3 Breakouts IS and CM F will coordinate the topics, timing and speakers for the breakout sessions in an attempt to ensure that there is no duplication and that the overall program is coherent. However, IS and CMF each reserve the right to make the final decisions on topics and speakers for the break out sessions each designs. . IS and CMF will hold separate business meetings for their respective members during the breakfast plenary on Thursday, November 4. CM F will take the lead in organizing topics, speakers, location s and transportation for o ff-site sessions. CMF will have the final say on off-site session locations, topics and speakers. Any pre-conference programming (activities or sessions held prior to I :30 pm, Wednesday, November 4) will be organized separately by IS or CM F and pa id for through special registration or dedicated sponsorship funds . These separate sessions w ill be integrated into the registration system. • Pre-confe rence act ivities that are open to all participants at an additional cost include: the Public Policy Action Institute and the Globa l Issues Dinner. The CMF Opening Luncheon is limited to CMF members only and will be paid for separately from additional conference registration fees. NGEN pre-conference activities will be paid for with dedicated sponsorship funds and will be limited to participants under the age of 40. All conference attendees under the age of 40 are eligible to register for and attend NGen sessions. Logistics llotel Contract IS holds the contract with the Marriott Renaissance for all conference related activities. IS will provide a copy of the contract in full to CM Fin advance of completing th e ~o tJtL__ _____ _____ _ _________ Co mment [SRl]: We are m the process o f CJompleting the addendum neg01•at1ons \\'llh the hotel and ~Nill pro...-ide a copy of the contract as soon a~ 11 In coordination with CMF, IS will take the lead in working with the hotel to allocate meeting space for all sessions of the joint conference and any pre-conference 1S complete. �activities. The IS Conference Director will be the point person with the hotel in developing menus, providing guarantees, placing A V orders, etc. and will review final plan with CMF. A CMF staff person will be assigned to work on site with the IS Conference Director. • Hotel G uestroom Block: IS and CM F acknowledge the following gues troo m rates: $184.00 Single/D ouble (excl uding 15% tax) $204.00 Triple (excluding 15% tax) $224.00 Q uad (excluding 15% tax) • JS will take the lead and manage, in coordination with CMF, the sleeping room block for the joint con ference. • Jn addition to the assigned sleeping rooms, one hospitality suite will be reserved for CM F Family Foundations • IS and Ci\!1 F agree tO the following guestroom block: D ate 11/1/09 11/2/09 11/3/09 11/4/09 11/5/09 11 /6/09 11/7/09 TOTAL Day Sun Mon Tue Wed T hu Fri Sat IS Block 10 20 134 32 1 325 60 3 873 IS Upgrad e 0 0 5 5 0 0 IS Suites 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 15 3 5 CMF CMF CMF Block 0 0 40 120 120 0 0 280 Suites Up grades 0 0 0 2 1 1 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 6 T otal 10 20 167 530 534 60 3 1,179 • JS and CMF agree to pay, as part of the conference costs, liqu idated damages. Liquidated damages are defined as the difference between [80%] of the room night co mmitment f1 ,324] and the joint conference actual usage, multiplied by the average group rate. Any damages will be considered as part of the joint conference expenses. The food and beverage minimum agreed to with the hotel is $130,000 . O ther L<>gistics IS will take the lead in working with irs production company tO create the staging and produce (lighting, audio and visual) the plenary sessions. IS will seek inp ut from CM Fin developing the overall look o f the staging. IS will be responsible for making the final decisions on staging and use of the production company. In coordination with IS, CMF will take the lead in working with the Host Reception venue to develop menu s, decor, entertainment and transportation. �Both IS and CM F will provide on site staffing to manage all logistical and programmatic aspects of the conference. In advance of the conference IS and CMF will work together to develop a staff assignment plan, and work out the detai ls of superv ision. IS and CMF will work together to develop a staff resource guide and briefing materials. E xhibit Ha ll • Jn coordination with CM F, JS will take the lead managing the registration p rocess and o nsite activities related tO the conference exhibitio n and exhibitors. Th e exhibit hall features and activities include: Confere nce Books tore Cyber Cafe N etwork ing Lounge Confere nce Materials distribu tio n area Coffee Break s Receptions Book Signings With input from IS, CMF w ill take the lead in locating and managing the cyber cafe vendor and the bookstore. The bookstore is a local book seller, generally with broad access to publishers and authors that focus on the nonprofit sector. The store is located in the exhibit hal l. CMF will work with the store to especially make availab le the books offered by conference speakers and will work with thei r publishers to organize any book signings. JS's contracted vendor, Free man, will serve as the o fficial vendor for supplying exhibit booths, as well as the exhibition entrance u nit, lo unge fu rniture and o cher fu rnishing needs. Ex pense Budget IS and CMF will agree to a Master Budget that incorporates all direct conference related expenses (Attachment B). o Any additional expenses incurred by either organization will be the individual responsibility of that organization. This includes but is not limited to salary, benefits and indirect costs. For the purpose of determining whether a surplus or budget exists after all revenues and expenses are accounted for, the actual expenditures related to the Master Budget will be compared to the total of registration fees, exhib it fees, program advertisements and any funds ra ised jointly by IS and CM F. o If these so urces do not cover the actual expenditures, IS and CM F will be required to cover any deficit proportional to the number of registrants attributed to each organization. It will be assumed that all Michigan based �o foundations will be considered CM F registrants and all others will be IS registrants. If there is a surplus of funds from registration fees, exhibit fees, program advertisements and any sponsorsh ip funds raised jointly, the funds wi ll be distributed to IS and CM F proportional to the number of registrants attributed to each o rganization. It will be assumed that all Michigan based foundations wi ll be considered CMF registrants and all others will be IS registrants. IS will manage the expense budget and will pay all expenses incurred ou t of the conference proceeds which include but are not limited to registration fees, exhibit fees, program advertisements, and any funds raised. o IS will provide projected budget expense updates to CMF momhly. o IS will infom1 CMF in advance of any potential changes to the budget that increases or decreases a line-item by 15% or more if the impact is greater than $1 ,000. o IS and CMF w ill work together to find ways to minimize expenses. Shortly after December 31 , 2009 IS will provide a preliminary accounting to CM F of all expenses incurred against the Master Budget and will provide an update shortly afier January 31, 20 I 0. IS will provide CM F with detail expenses as requested. lf CMF receives an invoice for joint conference expenses the invoice will be sent to IS for payment. Any out of pocket expenses incurred by CM F th at nrc part of the joint conference budget shall be reimbursed by IS monthly. Scholarships for conference participants will not be part of the joint budget. Registration and Exhibit Fees One registration site will service all conference registrants. IS will contract with the registration company to develop a single site th at can be accessed through either the IS websi te o r the CM F website. All acti vities for the joint conference and any special pre-conference activ ities will be listed on this s ite~ L---~~--~~-IS will engage CMF in discussion of what elements to include on the site 0 and will share draft copy for comments. o CMF wi ll provide draft copy for any portions of the site specific to its special pre-con ference activities or break out sessions, as appropriate. o Any changes to registration deadlines, rates or offering of special registration rate programs will be decided jointly by IS and CM F. o IS and C M F will work w ith the registration vendor to find an acceptable way to incorporate CMF member data into the registration system for processing. Comment [SR2]: The regis1ra1ion llltt conneCIIi to the IS conference "'eb!>ite. ll1s no1the u:me site. �IS and CMF will have full access to the administrative sections of the registration site so that both organizations ca n view progress on registrations, revenue and view the list of registrants. Revenue intended as support for the Master Budget - including registration fees, exhibit fees-- will be collected by IS by check or credit card from individual regisn·ants to cover direct conference expenses. (See above for distribution of any surplus or handling of any deficit). IS will share with CMF its weekly compilation ofregisn·ation data. See Attachment C fo r proposed registration and exhibito r fees. Speakers will not be charged a registration fee to attend the conference session at which they are speaking. If they elect to attend any other sessions, they will be requ ired to pay the appropriate rate .. Fundraising IS and CMF will develop and agree to a list of local and national donors to include in a joint fundraising strategy and wh ich donors each organization wi ll approach separately. (Sec Attachment D for joint prospects and individual prospects- TO BE ATTACHED) IS and CMF will develop a coordinated strategy, set of messages and approaches for joint fundraising and wi ll keep each other informed of separate proposals to ensure there is no duplication or overlap. Funds raised as part of the j oint strategy will be allocated to support the direct conference costs as spelled out in the Master Budget. Any surplus funds raised jointly will be allocated to each organization proportional to the number of registrants attributed to each organization. It w ill be assumed that all Michigan based foundations will be co nsidered CMF registrants and all others will be IS registrants. Promotions In coordination with CMF, IS wi ll take the lead in developing the graphic look and content for conference promotional and marketing materials. IS will be responsible for managing designers, printers, copywriters and any other vendors that will be a part of creating marketing/promotional materials for the annual conference. IS and CMF will work together to effectively blend the graphic standards of their individual organization brands into the overall design of conference materials .. CMF will be given the opportunity to review promotional materials to ensure �accuracy in the graphic look and copy content and positioning of CM F programming. IS wi ll have final approval of promotional materials. Marketing materials for the joint con ference will be written and designed so that IS and CMF can adapt the conference name/title when distrib uting to their respective audiences. Uses for targeting to each organization 's stakeholders include: IS & CMF websites, electronic post cards, emails, and letter distribution, flyers/handbill distributions, speeches, etc. CMF will have final approval of promotional materials going to Michigan foundations, which are not IS members. IS may send materials to its existing members in Michigan. Distribution of marketing materials will be handled in the following way: o o o CMF will promote to CMF members and non-member Michigan foundations IS will promote to its membership which includes Michigan based fo undations Each organization will use its own existing distrib ution methods; print materials will be paid for from the joint budget The acceptable con ference names to be used in promotional materials distributed in advance of the conference arc: o 2009 Independent Sector Annual Conference in Partnership with the Council of Michigan Foundations o 2009/S Annual Conference in Partnership with CMF o 2009 Council of Michigan Foundations Annual Conference in Partnership with Independent Sector o 2009 CMF Annual Conference in Partnership with IS The acceptable conference name on-site wi ll be: 2009 Independent Sector & Council of Michigan Foundations Annual Conferences In coordination with CMF, IS will take the lead on materials d istributed to conference participants, including the program, and speaker bio book. Materials distrib uted to conference participants wi ll be co-branded, dual logos, equally balanced. For information distinct to CMF- organization description and background information, session descriptions, and speaker bio information CMF wi ll provide copy to IS to incorporate into the full prof,•Tam. IS will send preliminary copy of the full program to CMF for comment and input. IS reserves the right to final decision on program copy. In coordination with CMF, IS will take the lead in developing methods for surveying conference participants, including the development of a questionnaire distributed to registrants at the conference's conc lusion. �Both IS and CMF will receive copies of audio and visual materials resulting from the conference, including photographs taken by the conference photographer, video and audio tape of plenary sessions, and transcripts of plenary sessions. CMF will take the lead in locating and hiring a photographer for the conference. CM F and IS will coordinate developing a list of desired shots in advance of the conference, and the photographer's schedule shall be negotiated between the organizations and finalized one week prior to the conference. IS and CMF will share their respective media outreach plans by May I. Media outreach activities include calendar announcements, interviews (pre-conference, during, and post-conference), editorial board visits, press conferences, etc. IS's CEO will serve as the p rimary media spokesperson for any media interviews generated by IS staff or board members. CMF's CEO will serve as the primary media spokesperson for any media interviews generated by CM F staff or board members. ,IS staff wi ll alert CM F to any med ia outreach plans or unanticipated opportunities in Michigan. The authorized representatives of IS and CMF agree to the terms of this Memorandum by signing below: For Independent Sector Date For Co uncil on Michigan Foundations Date � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2009_BB_2009-02-24_Conference-Committee Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book conference committee Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book conference committee. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50755 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2009-02-24 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/82ac901876ef5ab7e8cabd397a4763aa.pdf 97de2d411e6b91828f1507ee21813c4c PDF Text Text CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Date: February 13, 2009 Memo to: Melonie Colaianne, Chairperson, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Phil Peters, Chair, CMF Audit Committee, and Dave L indberg, Vice President Finance & Administration RE: CMF 2009-10 Budget Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees accept the 2009-10 CMF Core Services and Endowment Funds Budgets as recommended by the CMF Audit & Executive Committees. Background On February 9, 2009, both the Audit Committee and Executive Committee had m eetings and approved the enclosed budget. As noted in the Minutes of the Executive Committee, both Committees also approved the following Core Member Services Surplus Sharing Plan on a trial basis for 2009-10, in light of the wage freeze that management proposed. RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve a one year operating surplus sharing system for 2009-10 in which all CMF staff working at least 16 hours a week, except for those staff dedicated 100% to special projects, are eligible to share equally in up to $10,000 of any Core Member Services surplus. In conducting the annual review of the CMF personnel policies, management reports that there are no changes proposed that have a financial impact on the 2009-10 budget. Health insurance premiums have increased 13% effective January 1, 2009. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Budget Memo.doc �CMF Core Member Services Revenue Note 1: Membership Investment Based on payments received through 12-31-08 it appears membership will total $994,000 for 2008-09, which is the fifth year of the current dues structure. Based on the investment market results we have estimated members' assets to decrease by 25% from the 12-31-07 level, which would drop many members into a lower dues category, potentially reducing revenue by $ 120,000. As part ofthe renewal process we will ask members to remain at their 2008-09 dues level if possible and have estimated this would result in an additional $21,000, primarily from the larger members. Revenue is budgeted to change due to the following items: ($120,000) Decrease in members' asset levels Members remain at 2008-09 level even those 21,000 whose assets result in lower dues category Net new members 0 @ $each 0 Total $99,000 The Membership Committee has been reactivated to help staff with efforts to retain members as well as look at possible new member classifications. Note 2: Additional Member Contributions The bulk of this category includes the $150,000 contribution from Kellogg. 2009-10 is the final year of the current five-year $150,000/yr grant commitment from Kellogg. Several years ago we had success requesting additional funds with the membership renewal request to cover specific items such as technology equipment, special publications, etc. , and have budgeted to generate an additional $25,000 for types of items in 2009-10. Note 3: Other Grants In November 2005 CMF received a 3-year $25,000/yr grant from The Skillman Foundation to support the occupancy cost for the Southeast Michigan office, which is located at Skillman. 2008-09 represented the final year of this grant. Skillman has given CMF the verbal approval to occupy the current space for one more year and this commitment should be fonnalized by the end of February. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Budget Memo.doc �Note 4: Conference & Meetings The decrease in revenue and expenses is due primarily to the anticipated reduction in attendees and sponsorship for the November 2009 Annual Conference. The Annual Conference is budgeted to provide $100,000 to support a portion of the staff time to produce this event vs. the $142,000 that was generated from the October 2008 conference. Total staff time for the conference has been estimated at roughly $200,000 and is not currently charged to the conference expense line item. Note 5: Publications Income The 16111 Edition ofthe Michigan Foundation Directory is budgeted to be ready for sale in the summer of2009 listing only those foundations that accept applications vs. all foundations as in prior editions. A print-only version will be produced, dropping the CD for this edition. In addition, we have budgeted to sell for the first time Creating and Managing a Family Foundation and are projecting 130 sales at $75 each. Publication 161n Edition Michigan Foundation Directory Creating & Managing a Family Foundation Mise sales Total Revenue $48,000 10,000 1,000 $59,000 The overall surplus budgeted for the Directory is $37,000, which is produced every two years. Note 6: Investment Earnings Due to the drop in the market value of the Operating Endowment Fund, less income will be available for spending in 2009-10. The remaining interest from the operating funds, which is invested in a money market account, should remain consistent with 2008-09. Expenses Note 7: Wages & Benefits No cost of living adjustment or merit increase has been budgeted for 2009- 10. $37,000 in Core wages has been allocated to potential future special projects. $15,000 in savings has been budgeted for the reductions in hours of the Director of Technology's position. These two items are partially offset by the VP of Corporate Services position which was filled in mid-November 2008. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Budget Memo.doc �Note 8: Equipment & F urniture The reduction is primarily due to the President's car that was purchased in 2008-09. Note 9: Dues & Sponsorships $21 ,000 of this amount represents the dues payment to the Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers. Note 10: Communications/Publications The change from the prior year is due to the following items: Reduction in use of Editorial Consultant Product costs 16tn Edition of Michigan Foundation Directory ($19,000) 21 ,000 While a reduction in the hours of Mike Gallagher, our editorial consu ltant, is being recommended, he will still focus on NewsWire. In addition, there is the potential to involve his services through funding provided by Special Projects. Senior staff will be asked to do more w riting both for the webs ite and CMF publications. Note 11: Professional & Contracted Services The decrease from the prior year is due to the cancellation of the newsclip service since we can now access member news via the internet. Expenses for 2009-1 0 Lobbying/Advocacy - Michigan - Public Affairs Assoc. Legal - Clark Hill Audit Fees Mise Total $18,000 10,000 5,500 500 $34,000 Note 12: Travel By reducing travel to national conferences we have been able to reduce this line item by approximately 40%. There is no reduction in travel within Michigan because it would impact our ability to serve members. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Budget Memo.doc �Endowment Funds Spendable income is budgeted based on a 5% twenty-quarter rolling average spending policy. Because the value of the 4 quarters that were dropped out of the 2009-10 calculation were significantly lower than the four quarters added, spendable income has actual increased for the coming year. The spendable income projected for 2010-11 assumes the market remains flat for 2009. William W. Allen Fund The purpose of this fund is to further the understanding of private philanthropy in federal and state legislative and regulatory matters. The fund was established with contributions from CMF members in honor of William Allen, who was the first CMF Government Relations Committee Chainnan. Spendable Income Spendable Income Spendable Income 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 $8,600 $9,000 $8,500 Budgeted Expenses: 161n Edition of Directories to legislators CMF staff travel including Public Policy Fellow COF Hill visit registrations fees for CMF Members Cost to be passed along to members ZIP to District Matching file Misc. expenses 2,700 $2,000 3,500 900 400 Russell G. Mawby Fund to Improve and Increase Philanthropy The fund was established to honor Dr. Mawby's contributions to Michigan philanthropy. The purpose of this fund is to improve and increase philanthropy by continuing and expanding CMF's efforts to enhance philanthropy and expand charitable resources available in the State ofMichigan. Spendable Income Spendable Income Spendable Income 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 $73,000 $77,000 $73,000 S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Budget Memo.doc �Budgeted Expenses: Dues & Sponsorship: NCFP Online Governor's Service Awards- Mawby Award Video Michigan Women' s Foundation Award Dinner MNA Nonprofit Day W. Michigan Chapter Nat' ] Philanthropy Day MNA Grantmaker/Grantseeker Conference Mise Books & Subscriptions 1611 Edition Directories to Legislators (1 38 @ $85) Professional Mise projects Travel & Training Dinner for Members at Governor's Service Award Event Diversity Training 3,600 2,500 500 1,000 500 500 11,700 11,700 1,000 4,000 Ruth & Russ Mawby Fund for Kids This fund was established in December of 1995, with a $500,000 directed contribution from the W. K. Kellogg Foundation, by Ruth and Russ Mawby. The purpose of this fund is to improve and increase philanlhrupy Lhruugh yuulh invulvt:mt:nl in Lht: Slalt: of Michigan. Spendable Income Spendable Income Spendable Income 2008-09 2009-10 2010- 11 $42,000 $44,000 $42,000 Budgeted Expenses: Summer Intern Wages & Benefits Travel & Training Intern & Program Assoc. Summer Youth Conference (Revenue $25,000) YAC Advisor Training Emerging Practitioners in Philanthropy meeting 5,500 4,700 41 ,400 500 500 Dorothy A. Johnson Educational Fund The Dorothy A. Jolmson Endowment Fund was established in 1999 to honor the work of our founding President. The purpose of this fund is to support speaker expenses at the Annual Conference and promote the principles and practices of effective grantmaking. Spendable Income Spendable Income Spendable Income 2008-09 2009- 10 2010-11 $49,000 $49,000 $47,000 S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Budget Memo.doc �Budgeted Expenses: I CMF Annual Conference support $49,ooo I Community Foundation Endowment Fund The purpose of this fund is to support CMF's technical assistance to community foundations in M ichigan. Spendable Income Spendable Income Spendable Income 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 $358,000 $375,000 $359,000 There is a separate detailed budget sheet for this Fund. MCFYP Endowment (Michigan Community Foundation Youth Project) This fund was established from the surplus challenge grant dollars that remained at the end of the community foundation youth challenge grants. The purpose of this fund is to support the ongoing technical assistance and training needs of the 86 community foundation Youth Advisory Committees (YACs) in Michigan. Spendable Income Spendable Income Spendable Income 2008-09 2009- 10 2010-11 $57,000 $60,000 $58,000 Budgeted Expenses: Youth Program Associate Telephone & Supplies Technology Travel & Registration Fees MCFYP Committee meetings YAC Adv isor Calls Mise meetings $24,000 1,300 5,000 2,000 2,700 500 300 Margaret Ann (Ranny) Riecker Leadership Fund This fund was established in September 2002 to honor the leadership Ms. Riecker provided in her 26 years as trustee and two terms as Chair of CMF. The purpose of this fund is to support innovative leadership that increases, enhances and improves philanthropy in the state of Michigan - at this time the work of the Public Policy Fellow. Spendable Income Spendable Income 2008-09 2009-10 S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Budget Memo.doc �I Spendable Income 1 2o1o-11 $56,ooo 1 Budgeted Expenses: Public Policy Fellow salary Fellow Telephone $55,000 2,000 Community Foundation Technology Fund In February 2003, the CMF Board of Trustees established this fund from the accumulated interest earnings and repaid loans of the Kellogg Computer Grant. The purpose of this fund is to support the on going technology needs of Michigan community foundations. Spendable Income Spendable Income Spendable Income 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 $24,000 $24,000 $23,000 Budgeted Expenses: FIMS Support- Consultant - Bill Nethercut Mise Technology. $16,000 8,000 William C. Richardson Endowment Fund In October 2005 the CMF Board of Trustees approved the establishment of this endowment fund from a $400,000 designated gift from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation by Dr. Richardson. The purpose of this fund is to support the ongoing involvement in an intern/fellowship role at CMF by students from Michigan colleges or universities who are interested in careers involving the nonprofit sector and public policy. Spendable Income Spendable Income Spendable Income 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 $22,000 $20,000 $18,000 Budgeted Expenses: Public Policy Committee meetings, net of registration fees Public Policy Briefings (net of registration fees) Legal work (L3C) etc. Public Policy Fellow Travel 2,000 2,800 7,000 $15,000 Carl F. Reitz Fund for Investment Education S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Budget Memo.doc �On December 19, 2005, the CMF Executive Committee approved the establishment ofthis fund from a $25,000 gift from the Besser Foundation and a matching $25,000 transfer from CMF's Core Fund balance. The purpose of this fund is to honor Mr. Reitz's long time service to CMF as a trustee and the interest he has in investment education for foundation staff and trustees. Spendable Income Spendable Income Spendable Income 2008-09 2009- 10 2010-11 $2,600 $2,500 $2,200 Budgeted Expenses: I Investment Session at Annual Conference $2,5oo I CMF Core Services Endowment Fund In March 2007, the CMF Board approved the establishment of an endowment fund to support ongoing member services using $600,000 from the surplus dollars that have accumulated over the years. 2008-09 is the first year that income is available for spending. Spendable Income Spendable Income Spendable Income 2008-09 2009-10 2010- 11 $30,000 $27,000 $25,000 S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\2.24.09 Meeting Materials\Budget Memo.doc �Council of Michigan Foundations Core Member Services Budget 2009-10 Budget 2008-09 Revenues Membership Investment Additional Member Contributions Other Grants- Detroit Office Conference & Meetings Publications Other Income Investment Earnings Operating Fds. Investment earnings Endow Fd Total Revenues Program/Admin Expenses Wages & Benefits Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Depreciation Technology Dues & Sponsorship Books & Subscriptions Communications/Publications Professional Services Travel Training & Seminars Conference & Meetings (Gain)/Loss Sale of Fixed Assets Overhead Allocation to Spec Projects Total Program/Admin Projected 2008-09 $1,006,000 166,000 25,000 598,000 15,000 2,000 108,000 30,000 1,950,000 $ 994,000 167,000 23,000 650,000 18,000 1,000 65,000 30,000 1,948,000 1,014,000 68,000 13,000 3,000 20,000 30,000 6,000 970,000 70,000 13,000 2,500 14,000 22,000 4,000 30,000 987,000 71,000 12,000 2,500 13,000 20,000 4,000 74,000 34,500 5,000 88,000 40,000 63,000 9,000 484,000 67,000 33,000 5,000 66,000 40,000 63,000 9,000 536,000 64,000 32,000 4,000 71,000 34,000 41,000 3,000 360,000 (1 ,500) 1,950,000 (1 ,300) 1,943,200 (1 ,500) 1,717,000 Grants Challenge Grants Mini-Grants Computer Grants Other Grants Total Grants Excess Revenues Over Expenditures Beginning Net Assets CHANGE IN FUND BALANCE Ending Net Assets S:\Finance\Budgets\09-10\Core 09-10 Budget 2009-10 Note Note Note Note Note 1 2 3 4 5 Note 6 Note 6 Note 7 Note 8 Note 9 Note 10 Note 11 Note 12 Note 4 0 0 4,800 0 1,815,112 0 1,815,112 1,815,112 4,800 1,819,912 1 .819.91 ~ 1,819,912 I �Council of Michigan Foundations Allen Fund Budget 2009-1 0 12 Month Projected 2008-09 Revenues Spendable Income Endowment Fund Member Contributions Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Conference Income Publications Other Income Investment Income Total Revenues Program Expenses Wages & Benefits Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Depreciation Technology Dues & Sponsorship Books & Subscriptions Communications/Publications Professional & Contracted Services Travel Training & Seminars Conference & Meeting Overhead Total Program Grants Challenge Grants Mini-Grants Computer Grants Other Grants Total Grants Excess Revenues Over Expenditures Beginning Fund Balance Transfer to Spendable Income Activity Ending Fund Balance S:\Finance\Budgets\09-1 0\Endowment Funds 09-10 Budget 2009-10 8,600 9,000 2,850 3,000 0 11,450 12,000 400 400 900 900 2,700 2,000 2,000 3,325 3,500 6,625 9,500 0 0 4,825 2,500 212,485 (8,600) (41 ,175) $162,710 162,710 (9,000) 2,500 $156,210 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2009_BB_2009-02-24_Budget Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book budget Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book budget. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50754 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2009-02-24 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/bbbb33a4c69485148a93b7dd78d631e7.pdf b2ac423a9048a531264b4955bc2d0e75 PDF Text Text CMF Councilof Michi an Foun~tions Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. Board of Trustees Meeting Tuesday, February 24, 2009 10:00 a.m.-3:00p.m. University Club ofMSU (directions in front pocket) Rooms B106 & 107 3435 Forest Road Lansing, MI 48909 517.353.5111 AGENDA I. Tab Call to Order/Introductions Melonie Colaianne, Chairperson ACTION ITEMS II. Consent Agenda Minutes of October 13, 2008 Board Meeting Minutes of the February 9, 2009 Executive Committee Meeting Treasurer' s Report Investment Committee 1 III. 2009-10 Plan of Work Rob Collier 2 IV. 2009- 10 Budget Phil Peters & Dave Lindberg 3 V. Membership Committee John Colina 4 VI. Government Relations Andrea Cole & Carol Paine-McGovern 5 �Board Meeting Agenda February 24, 2009 Page 2 REPORTS VII. President's Report • 37th Annual Conference • Diversity & Inclusion Initiative Carol Goss, Vicki Rosenberg & K imberly Burton • Public Policy Dave Egner & Dana Linnane 12:30 p.m. VIII. Break for LUNCH in Dining Room Special Briefing: M ichigan's Response to the Federal Stimulus Package • • IX. 6 Regina Bell Director of Policy, Office of Governor Jennifer Granholm Stanley "Skip" Pruss Director, Michigan Department of Energy, Labor & Economic Growth (DELEG) (bios in back pocket) Adjournment Next Meeting Dates: Board of Trustees Meeting Date: Thursday, June 4, 2009 Location: MASCO Corporation Foundation, Taylor 3ih Annual Conference - November 4--6, 2009 Date: November 5, 2009 Time: 2:30- 5:00 p.m. Location : Detroit Marriott �CMF Council of Michigan Founaations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. Executive Summary of2.24.09 Board Agenda TAB I. Call to Order & Introductions- Melonie Colaianne, Chairperson ACTION ITEMS II. Consent Agenda Minutes of October 13,2008 Board Meeting Minutes of the February 9, 2009 Executive Committee Meeting Treasurer's Report Investment Committee 1 RESOLVED that the October 13, 2008 Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes, the February 9, 2009 Executive Committee Minutes, the December 31, 2008 Financial Statements and the December 31, 2008 Investment Committee Report be accepted as presented. III. 2009-10 Plan of Work 2 RESOLVED that the Plan of Work for 2009-10 be approved as recommended by the Executive Committee. IV. 2009- 10 Budgt:l 3 RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees accept the 2009-10 CMF Core Services and Endowment Funds Budgets as recommended by the CMF Audit & Executive Committees. AND RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees approve a one year operating surplus sharing system for 2009-10 in which all CMF staff working at least 16 hours a week, except for those staff dedicated 100% to special projects, are eligible to share equally in up to $10,000 of any Core Member Services surplus. V. Membership Committee 4 RESOLVED that the following grantmakers be approved for membership: • The Gerald C. Timmis and Dorothy S. Timmis Foundation, Novi • Foellinger Foundation, Fort Wayne, IN • Citizens Banking Corporation Charitable Foundation, Flint AND RESOLVED that the Membership Committee recommends that the 21 delinquent members as listed below be dropped from the CMF membership as of March 31, 2009. AND RESOLVED that each Trustee and other volunteers from the membership be invited to call three members each between March and May 2009 with a goal to promote the value of membership in CMF. �Board Agenda Summary February 24, 2009 Page 2 TAB AND RESOLVED that the seven Guidi1tg Pri1tciples that are a condition of membership be amended for Corporate Giving Program members to: 1. Adhere to the highest standards of ethical behavior in all corporate giving actions. 2. Honor the charitable giving intent of the corporation. 3. Have an identifiable active group within the company that sets and regularly reviews policies impacting grantmaking, including: conflict of interest, self dealing, finance and communications. 4. Be accessible by having basic grantmaking information readily available regarding funding priorities and application requirements. 5. Build constructive relationships based on mutual respect, candor, confidentiality and understanding with the public, applicants and grantees. 6. Strive to include the perspectives, opinions and experiences of the broadest possible cross-section of people to inform the corporate giving program through its advisors/consultants, its business practices, and other interactions with the nonprofit community. 7. Support continuous learning by both corporate staff responsible for giving programs and grantees. VI. Government Relations 5 RESOLVED that CMF support the addition of Goals to its 2009 Legislative Priorities Statement that address the issues of: orphan trusts, community foundations distributing designated federal funds, a formal position with goals for the Estate Tax in 2010 and promotion of a White House Conference on Philanthropy in 2010 as summarized. REPORTS VII. President's Report • 37th Annual Conference • Diversity & Inclusion Initiative Carol Goss, Vicki Rosenberg & Kimberly Burton • Public Policy Dave Egner & Dana Linnane 12:30 p.m. Break for LUNCH in Dining Room VIII. Special Briefing: Michigan's Response to the Federal Stimulus Package 1:15- 3:00p.m. • Regina Bell Director of Policy, Office of Governor Jennifer Granholm • Stanley "Skip" Pruss Director, Michigan Department of Energy, Labor & Economic Growth (DELEG) (bios in back pocket) IX. Adjournment 6 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2009_BB_2009-02-24_Board-Agenda Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book board agenda Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009-02-24 board book board agenda. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50753 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2009-02-24 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/a06c9aa92947f07db64cd552215533e4.pdf f753543031aa1134270a6542f1612027 PDF Text Text CHALLENGING TIMES NEW OPPORTUNITIES 0' INDEPENDENT SECTOR AND g COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS C"'' ANNUAL CONFERENCE A VItal voice fo r. us all Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. �Working together to help all children succeed. One of our toughest challenges today is creating a world where all children can thrive. Too many kids in Detroit and beyond are growing up without access to quality education, health care and other supports that help them grow and develop into contributing members of society. Cereal industry pioneer WK. Kellogg believed that ideas are the fuel of innovation. As stewards of this legacy, we are always searching for solutions that work on behalf of children, families and communities. We welcome creative thoughts from members of Independent Sector and look forward to continuing conversations that emerge from this conference. ra W.K. KELLOGG FOUNDATION Our Children. Our Mission. Our Future. www.wkkf.org �Dear Colleagues, Welcome to Detroit and the 2009 Independent Sector and Council of Michigan Foundations Annual Conference! We are delighted by our organizations' partnership in bringing the charitable and philanthropic community together for what promises to be three days of dynamic and thought-provoking discussions. In light of the challenges that we have all faced over the past 18 months or so, we have been working together closely and pooling our resources in an effort to provide a community forum where you have access to the best ideas and experiences available in our sector. We hope this gathering also offers you an opportunity to collaborate in fresh new ways, learn " best practices," and form mutually beneficial partnerships that reinvigo rate your organization and its ability to fulfill its mission. This year's conference features insightful, gifted speakers. It also promises to connect members of our community from around the country in a deeper way with the great work being done here in Michigan .We believe you will come away inspired by the talent and expertise of your colleagues and enriched by a renewed commitment to our shared vision of creating a more just and compassionate world. Thank you for joining us. Diana Aviv President and CEO Independent Sector President and CEO Council of Michigan Foundations Challenging Times, New Opportunities 3 �Schedule at a Glance Pre-Conference Sessions-Tuesday, November 3 I0:00 a.m.-S:30 p.m. Public Pol icy Action Institute (Cadillac Ballroom) 7:00-9:00 p.m. Global Civil Society Dinne r (Richard Room) 7:30-9:00 p.m. NG e n W e lcome Re ce ption and Speed N e tworking (LaSalle and Cadillac Rooms) Pre-Conference Sessions-Wednesday, November 4 8:00-8:4S a.m. NG e n Orie ntation (Cabot Room) 8:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m. 9:00-11 : IS a.m. Public Policy Action Institute (Cadillac Ballroom) NG e n Workshops (Richard and Bru fe Rooms) 9:30-1 I:00 a.m. Strategic Deve lopment Activitie s in a Trouble d Economy (Nicolet Room) I0:00-1 I:00 a.m. Newcome rs Confe re nce Orie ntation (Marquette Room) I0:00 a.m.- I:30 p.m. Marketplace and Exhibit Hall Grand Ope ning (Ontario Exhibit Hall, Level 3) I I :30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. IS Ne w Membe r Orientation (Nicolet Room) I I :30 a.m.-1 :00 p.m. Special Lunche on Ple nary for Michigan Grantmake rs: Ach ieving High e r Impact in the "New" Opportunities in Michigan's N ew Economy (Cartier Room) I I :30 a.m.- I:00 p.m. NG e n Keynote Lunch (Cabot Room) Conference Opening-Wednesday, November 4 I:30--4:00 p.m. Ope ning Ple nary: Navigating Change Togethe r (Columbus Room) 4:00--4:30 p.m. N e tworking Break in the Marke tplace (Ontario Exhibit Hall-East, Level3) 4:30-6:00 p.m. Bre akout Sessions • • • • • • • By 2020, Non profits' Use ofTechnology Has Transformed Society (Ontario Hall-West) Census 20 I0: Can We Get the Count Right? (Ambassador Salon 3) Community Foundations' Leadership Agenda: Now or Never (Marquette Room) Family Foundations: Doing More with Less (Nicolet Room) Information As a Core Community Need (Richard Room) Reinventing Foundations: Shifting Practices for Maximum Impact (Ambassador Salon I) What Works: Assessing and Achieving Impact (Ambassador Salon 2) CEO Track • Conversation with Diana Aviv (LaSalle A Room) • The Evolving Role of Nonprofit Boards (LaSalle B Room) 7:00-9:00 p.m. Host Reception at the De troit Institute of Arts (More information on pages 8 and 20.) Thursday, November 5 7: IS-8:30 a.m. Bre akfast Buffet (Renaissance Foyer) 7:4S-8:30 a.m. IS A nnual Me mbe rs' Mee ting and Breakfast (Columbus Room) 7:45-8:30 a.m. CMF Annual Me mbe rs' Meeting and Breakfast (Cabot Room) 8:30-9: IS a.m. Ple nary Session: Conve rsation with jeff Raike s, Gates Foundation (Columbus Room) 9: IS-9:4S a.m. N etworking Break in t he Marke tplace (Ontario Exhibit Hall-East, Level 3) Bre akout Sessions 9:4S-II : IS a.m. • Avoiding Family Foundation Missteps: Polic ies and Tools for Good Governance (Marquette Room) • By 2020, Nonprofits Facilitate Broad Civic Engagement that Fuels Our Democracy (Ontario Hall-West) • Corporate Philanthropy: Evolution and Transformation (Ambassador Salon 3) • Diversity Management and Inclusive Culture as a Vehicle for Creating Excellence in Organizations: From Vision to Action (Nicolet Room) • Forging the Nonprofit Community's Policy Priorities for 20 I0 (Ambassador Salon 2) • Improving Urban Food Deserts: Local Agriculture, Food Rescue, and Better Public Policy (Richard Room) • Nonprofit Survival Strategies (Ambassador Salon I) CEO Track • CEO Summit: Innovative Leadership, C ritical T hinking for Critical Times (Cadillac Ballroom) I I: IS-I I :4S a.m. Networking Break in the Marketplace (Ontario Exhibit Hall-East, Level 3) I I :4S a.m.- I :30 p.m. Luncheon Ple nary: Fashioning Our Future Toge the r (Columbus Room) 4 Challenging Times, New Opportunities �Thursday, November 5 (continued) I :30-2:00 p.m. Ne tworking Bre ak in the Marketplace (Ontario Exhibit Hall- East, Leve13) 2:00-3:30 p.m. Breakout Sessions • How Can Volunteers Help Your Organization ? Or Is That The W rong Q uestion? (Ambassador Salon I) • The Nonprofit Community and Health Care Reform (Ambassador..Salon 3) CEO Track • Organizational and Executive Compensation (LaSalle B Room) • Organizational Restructuring in Turbulent Times (LaSalle A Room) 2:00- 5:00 p.m. Breakout Session • Futu re Lab: By 2020, Non profits Lead the Way on Inclusion (Ontario Hall-West) 2:00-5: 30 p.m. Workshops • Advanced Practice Workshop with Jan Jaffe (Nicolet Room) • Better Presentations, Stronge r Leadership (Monet Room) Site Sessions (More information on pages 24-25) • Creativity- A Corridor for Integrating New and O ld • Immigration-Everybody Counts in O ur Revitalizat ion • The New (Green) Economy • Navigating the Economic Recovery Topic I: Navigating the Financial C risis 2009 Topic 2: Economic Recovery-Are We There Yet? • Reclaiming Community Assets • W ater is the New Oil 3:30-4:00 p.m. Networking Break in the Marketplace (Ontario Exhibit Hall-East, Level 3) 4:00-5:30 p.m. Breakout Sessions • Advocacy, Coalitions, Communications:W hat Does It Take to Change Policies and Practices? (Ambassador Salon I) • Leadership that Cultivates Innovation (Ambassador Salon 2) • W orking Effectively with the Administrat ion (Ambassador Salon 3) CEO Track Nonprofit CEO Re newal (LaSalle Room) 5:30-7:00 p.m. Wine and Cheese Reception (Ontario Exhibit Hall-East) 7:00-9:00 p.m. John W. Gardner Leadership Dinner (Columbus Room) 9:00- 11 :00 p.m. After Hours Social Event (Cabot Room) Friday, November 6 8:00-9: 30 a.m. Continental Breakfast (8:00- 9:00 a.m. located in Ontario Hall-East; 9:00-9:30 a.m. located in the Renaissance Foyer) 8:00-9:00 a.m. 8:00-9:00 a.m. NGen Closing Breakfast (Cadillac Room) Hot Topic Round Table Discussions and Breakfast (Ontario Exhibit Hall-East, Leve13) 8:00- 9:00 a.m. Breakout Session • Communicating Goals and Strategies for Impact: N onprofit Effect iveness Advisory Group Meeting (Brule Room) 9:30-1 I :00 a.m. Breakout Sessions The Bigger Picture (Ontario Hall-West) Caring to Change- Enabling Enduring Social Improvements (Marquette Room) Corporate Philanthropy Programming Best Practices (Richard Room) Diversity in Nonprofit Leadership: Problems and Solutions (Ambassador Salon I) Family Foundations: Documenting Your Legacy (Nicolet Room) The Road to Economic Recovery:W hat Do Foundations and Nonprofits Need to Do Now ? (Ambassador Salon 3) • St ars, Seals, and Beyond: Getting Nonprofit Impact Rat ings Right (Ambassador Salon 2) • • • • • • CEO Track • Conversation with the Gardner Leadersh ip Awardee-Geoffrey Canada (LaSalle A Room) I I:30 a.m.- 1:30 p.m. Closing Luncheon Plenary: Strengthening Communities Together (Columbus Room) Challenging Times, New Opportunities 5 �2009 CONFERENCE SPONSORS W e thank th e following spon sors for th eir fin ancial support of the Annual Conference. DISTINGUISHED LEADERS SUPPORTERS Ford Foundation W.K. Kellogg Foundation* John S. and James L. Knight Foundation The Kresge Foundation C harles Stewart Mott Foundation Aetna Foundation The California Well ness Foundation ccs A merican Express Foundation Bank of America* Max M. & Marjorie S. Fisher Foundation* lies Group at Merrill Lynch Kellogg Company Marguerite Casey Foundation* MASCO Corporation Foundation McGregor Fund* CONVENERS CONTRIBUTORS T he Annie E. Casey Foundation Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan DTE Energy Foundation H udson-Webber Foundation Skill man Foundation* W ai-Mart Foundat ion Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation Comerica Bank,Wealth & Institutional Management Quicken Loans LEADERS FRIENDS Clark H ill Commongood Careers Plante & Moran, PLLC PRESENTERS T he C leveland Foundation T he Joyce Foundat ion * Supporters ofthe 2009 Scholarship Program 2009 LEADERSHIP AWARD SUPPORTERS The American Express Foundation is the generous sponsor of the American Express Building Leadership Award. The William Randolph Hearst Foundations is a generous sponsor of the 2009 We thank the generous supporters of the 2009 John W. Gardner Leadership Dinner. • Stanley Druckenmiller and the HCZ Board of Trustees • Target John W . Gardner Leadership Award. 6 Challenging Time s, New Opportunities �,.... 2009 ANNUAL CONFERENCE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Thank yo u t o the o rganizations that made special contributions to the conference. For providing scholarships for more than I 00 emerging and experienced nonprofit leaders from Detroit, the state of Michigan, and beyond: I1.. Max M. & Marjorie S. Fisher Foundation Marguerite Casey Foundation McGregor Fund For supporting the NGen: Moving Nonprofit Leaders from Next to Now program: For serving as the conference susta.inability partners: Commongood Careers For helping administer a scholarship program for Michigan-based talented and innovative nonprofit leaders: For providing entertainment for the John W. Gardner Leadership Dinner: • • Detroit Institute of Arts • Detroit Symphony Orchestra, supported by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation • American Express Foundation For supporting the Michigan community foundation scholarships: For their artistic contributions: • Council of Michigan Foundations' Community Foundation Endowment Fund For supporting the Public Policy Action Institute: • The Cleveland Foundation • The Joyce Foundation Mosaic Youth Theatre of Detroit For hosting and performing at the Host Reception: Michigan Nonprofit Association For supporting the inaugural year of the NGen Fellows Program: • Bank of America • Wai-Mart Foundation . ccs • • Architects of Group Genius • lmaginatik • • The Annie E. Casey Foundation • • The Isles Group at Merrill Lynch For the generous in-kind contributions to the Envisioning Our Future Initiative and the Future Lab: • W.K. Kellogg Foundation • Bank of America • Skillman Foundation • • • For supporting sessions focused on public policy: Students from the Entertainment Arts and Illustration Departments of the College for Creative Studies in Detroit For helping to promote environmentally sustainable practices at our conference: • Student Conservation Association Challenging T im es, New Opport unities 7 �IMPORTANT INFORMATION Registration Hours W e dnesday, Novem ber 4: Thursday, Nove mbe r 5: Friday, Nove mbe r 6: 8:00 a.m.- 5:30 p.m. 7:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m. 7:00 a.m.- 12:00 p.m. Receiving Messages, Fax \( Detroit Marriott at the Renaissance Center Renaissance Center Drive Detroit , Michigan 48243 (313) 568-8000 Phone (313) 568-8 146 Fax Name Badge Please wear you r name badge at all times. Your badge allows access to conference sessions and also helps you get acquainted. Public Policy Action Institute Tuesday, Nove mber 3, I0:00 a.m.-5:30 p.m. and W e dne sday, Nove mber 4, 8:00 a.m.-12:30 p.m. Fee: ISICMF Member $195; Nonmember $270 Global Civil Society Dinner Tuesday, November 3, 7:00-9:00 p.m. Fee: $95 Strategic Development Activities in a Troubled Economy Wedne sday, Nove mbe r 4, 9:30-11:00 a.m . Host Reception: An Evening at ~t he Detroit Institute of Arts Tickets Wednesday, Nove mbe r 4, 7:00-9:00 p.m. Please present tickets included in your registration packet as you enter special sessions. Media, Photography, and Videotaping Reporters representing general and philanthropy media will attend many conference sessions. Reporters are required to check in at t he registration counters located in the Renaissance Ball room Foyer to obtain a press pass and a med ia kit . Conference sessions wi ll be videotaped and photographed for educational and promotional purposes. Hotel Map A map of t he hotel and meeting rooms is available on page 65. No Solicitation Rule The conference is designated t o bring together the leadership of the entire charitable community. To maintain the spi rit of t his unique meeting ground-where leaders from the grantmaking community and leaders from public charities co me together as peers-we ask that you respect the "no solicitation" rule. Please look for further details in your registration packet. 8 Pre-Conference Sessions and Special Events Reconnect with colleagues and meet new ones w hi le exploring the Detroit Institute of Arts, America's fifth largest museum of fine arts. W e are pleased to present a special performance by t he Detroit Symphony Orchestra, sponsored by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. One ticket for the host reception included with each full registration. Additional tickets can be purchased at the conference registration counters. Fee: $1 00 Host Reception Transportation Schedule Buses begin leaving from the Detroit Marriott Renaissance Center Hotel to the Detroit Institute of Arts (DIA) at 6:30 p.m. from the Motor Coach Lobby. Buses wi ll run on a cont inuous transportation loop between the hotel and the DIA from 6:30 to 9:00 p.m., approximately IS minutes apart. Parking at the Detroit Institute of Arts If you choose t o drive to the D IA, secured self-parking is available direct ly behind the museum on John R Street. Rates: $8/car for valet; $4/car self park john W. Gardner Leadership Award Dinner Thursday, November 5, 7:00-9:00 p.m . One ticket included with each full registration. Additional tickets can be purchased at the conference registration counters. Fee: $150 Challe nging Times, New Opportunities �In the Exhibit Hall (Ontario Exhibit Hall, Level 3) Take time between sessions to visit the Marketplace, located in the Exhibit Hall, and browse the latest resources and services available to nonprofit sector leaders presented by exhibitors. Enjoy complimentary coffee, soft drinks, and snacks with your fellow attendees. Independent Sector and Council of Michigan Foundations Onsite Visit the lndependen! Sector and Council of Michigan Foundations booths to learn about membership and programs, sign up for special services for members, and discuss how you can get more involved. Hall Hours W ednesday, November 4 I 0:00a.m.- I:30 p.m. Marketplace Grand Opening 4:00-4:30 p.m. Marketplace Break Cyber Cafe Visit the Cyber Cafe to check your email or access internet resources. Thursday, November 5 9: 15-9:45 a.m. Marketplace Break I I: 15-1 I:45 p.m. Marketplace Break I :30-2:00 p.m. Marketplace Break 3:30-4:00 p.m . Marketplace Break 5:30- 7:00 p.m. Wine and Cheese Reception (see page 29) Friday, November 6 8:00-9:00 a.m. Continental Breakfast 8:00-9:00 a.m. Hot Topic Round Tables Book Signings Thursday, November 5, 5:30-7:00 p.m . Visit the bookstore to meet the following authors and have their recent works signed. o Paul Brest, Money Well Spent: A Strategic Guide to Smart Philanthropy o David Horth, The Leader's Edge o Frances Kunreuther, Working Across Generations: Defining the Future of Nonprofit Leadership o Bob McKinnon, Actions Speak Loudest o Jonathan Schick, The Nonprofit Secret NGen Lounge NGen: Moving Nonprofit Leaders from Next to Now is dedicated to improving the nonprofit talent pool by developing the leadership skills of nonprofit professionals under the age of 40. The NGen Lounge, sponsored by Com r:n ongood Careers, provides young leaders with a dedicated space to network with peers, contribute ideas and insights to the NGen Facebook discussion, and check Twitter posts throughout the conference. We encourage NGen partipants and supporters to visit the NGen Lounge and add your voice to the conversation. Message Board A message bulleti n board is available in the Exhibit Hall to facilitate communication with other attendees. Conference Online Conference highlights-speeches, video clips, photos, and more- will be available on the IS website at www.independentsector.org and the C MF conference website at conference.michiganfoundations.org. Challenging Times, N ew Opportunities 9 I I �This year's conference has been designed to heighten engagement and allow every voice to be heard. Innovative formats will tap into the "collective genius" within the group so that together we can discover new and uncharted solutions. In addition to panel discussions, conference sessions wi ll be presented in one .of the formats described below. Note: Because the value of these formats depends heavily on the material covered during the initial minutes, we strongly encourage you to arrive promptly. \( PechaKucha* lnsightXChange A rapid fire presentation format that allows big ideas to be shared easily, concisely, and efficiently. A lively exchange between panelists that includes and engages the audience. In this format, five discussion leaders shape a compelling dialogue by each presenting 20 slides-no text, only pictures-for 20 seconds apiece.When the leaders have concluded their presentations, participants move into smaller groups with the discussion leaders for an in-depth exchange. A small group of speakers share their opinions on thought-provoking topics, with the audience encouraged-and expected-to interact with the panelists and with each other. ·~· ... I'.• • Limited to 75 participants on a first-come basis. ldeaZLab Participants consider ideas and solutions to core questions or challenges on a specific topic or theme. •·~· ,*• ••• These sessions begin with eight discussion leaders offering their ideas on an element of the session's theme. At the conclusion of the presentations, each leader adjourns to a table, to be joined by participants for an intimate exchange. Limited to 80 participants on a first-come basis. ••• •• • • • Future lab Special sessions that engage participants in identifying and testing ideas to dramatically increase the impact of the nonprofit community by 2020. These sessions focus on the changing landscape as it relat es to the future of the nonprofit sector. Highly interact ive sessions enable small groups to explore · old assumptions and new opportunities. Limited to I 00 participants on a first-come basis. * PechaKucha is Japanese for the sound of conversation or chit-chat. It was conceived in 2003 by Astrid Klein and Mark Dytham as a space for designers to meet, network, and show their work in public. There are many examples of PechaKucha in action available on the internet. 10 Challe ngingTime s, New Opportunities �Greening the Conference Thanks to the support of conference sponsors, Tuesday, November 3 7:00-9:00 p.m. Independent Sector and the Council of Michigan (Location: Richard Foyer) Foundations continue building on our efforts to be environmentally responsible in all facets of our joint conference operation: The Wai- Mart Foundation generously provides reusable water bot tles for all participants to refill at drink stations and custom USB flash drives to reduce paper use. As part of its commitment to best practices in sustainable printing, Bank of America generously sponsors the printing of all conference publications with soy-based ink on FSC-certified paper. Eco-friendly conference tote bags are sponsored by the Aetna Foundation . The bags are made from jute, a natural and sustainable fiber, and come from a fair trade company in Kolkata, India. Quicken Loans sponsors the conference lanyards that are made from I 00% recycled material. Global Civil Society Dinne r Join Rey Ramsey of O ne Economy Corporation for an exploration of how the cu r rent economic cr isis requires nonprofits and foundations to engage communities across the world in new ways. One Economy's innovative approach to empowering and connecting individuals from Detroit to Durban with the tools they need to enter the economic mainstream illustrates how vision, action, and leadership can strengthen communities and improve lives. Keynote Speaker: Rey- Ramsey, chief executive officer, O ne Economy Corporation Moderator: DavidYarnold, executive director, Environmental Defense Fund We are delighted to partner with the Marriott Renaissance Center Hotel, which has an imp ressive Requires special registration; $95 per ticket. "green" program. T he hotel is also arranging a food donation to Forgotten Harvest , metro Detroit's food rescue organization. With support from Bank of America, we have Twitter at the Conference partnered with the Student Conservation Association and Detroit urban youth to further promote We are eager to learn your thoughts during the conference. environmentally responsible practices. Please visit Tweet your ideas and reactions using the official conference hashtag: the association 's exhibit booth to learn more about this year's expanded conference greening effort, Detroit-based major environmental projects, and the association's programs that help reduce , reuse , and recycle. #iscmf09 NGen participants can also use the hashtag: #isngen Challenging Times, New Opportunitie s II �(Location: Cadillac Ballroom) Independent Sector's sixth annual Public Policy Action Institute will bring together nonprofit leaders, policy advocates, and communications professionals to develop winning strategies that influence legislation and regulations affecting the ability of nonprofits and foundations to serve their communities. Participants in ,the Institute will explore the 20 I0 political landscape at the state and federal levels, join in compelling roun_dtab les on policy issues confronting today's nonprofit sector, and discuss the most effective communications and advocacy strategies to convey key messages to lawmakers and other government officials. Supported by The Cleveland Foundation and the joyce Foundation II Tuesday, November 3 10:00 a.m. Welcome and Introductions I:30 p.m . Tax Reform and the Nonprofit Commumty 10:15 a.m. The 20 I0 Political Landscape at the State and Federal Level Several tax provisions enacted in 200 I and 2002 are set to expire next year, setting off a major effort by Congress to examine and reform federal tax policies. How will th~se changes impact the nonprofit and philanthropic community, and what do we need to do to prepare? Three members of the U.S. House of Representatives plan to join this discussion if schedules allow. A team of Capitol Hill veterans will also be on hand to share insights for addressing these critical issues. As the new administration and I I Ith Congress wrap up their first year, Nick Giordano, partner with Washington Council Ernst & Young, wi ll review what was accomplished, what remains to be done, and what can be expected in the year ahead. Meagan Dorsch, public affairs manager for the National Conference of State Legislatures, will discuss how states are addressing the fiscal crisis, as well as the political challenges and issues, states will face in 20 I0. 11:30 a.m. Senate Finance Committee: A View from the Inside Senator Debbie Stabenow (invited), a member of both the Senate Finance Committee and the Budget Committee, will share her views on the implications of the fiscal challenges facing the federal government, as well as other issues affecting the work of foundations and nonprofits in the com ing years. 12:00 p.m. Deli and Discussion Grab some lunch and join a tabletop discussion to share lessons about and design strategies for addressing such issues as the national broadband plan and its implications for foundations and nonprofits, restrictions on lobbyists and lobbying, the 20 I 0 census and redistricting efforts, health care reform, tax incentives for charitable giving, and reforming the government contracting process. 12 2:45p.m. Break 3:00p.m . Making the Case for Investing in Advocacy Policy advisors and advocates are always making the case for their organizations to invest- or keep investing- in advocacy. This can require convincing a board, a donor, and even senior management. A panel of experts will discuss research and techniques that help make the case that investing in advocacy can produce real progress . toward the outcomes an organization seeks. Speakers An-Me Chung, program officer, Charles Stewart Matt Foundation Aaron Dorfman, executive director, National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy Jared Raynor, senior consultant,TCC Group Challe ngingTime s, New Opportunities �'!'.(.-·~ y • • fz ;~·:PUBLIC POLICY ACTION INSTITUTE 4: 15p.m . Using Networks to Build Capacity for Policy Advocacy A strong network is essential to achieving real policy change-but what does it take to build an effective, lasting coalition? Learn from three outstanding leaders about the strategies they have used to build successful policy networks and coalitions. Speakers Ellen Buchman, vice president of field operations, Leadership Conference on Civil Rights AnnMaura Connolly, senior vice president, City Year Jennifer Kottler, senior political director, Sojourners 5:30p.m. Wrap-Up Wednesday, November 4 10:00 a.m. Evaluating Advocacy There has been tremendous creativity and growth in the field of advocacy evaluat ion ove r t he last several years, and there are now multiple tools and a growing base of experience to help funders and nonprofits assess their lobbying and advocacy efforts. Th ree experts who have been at the center of these efforts will draw from their experiences to explain the value of different approaches to evaluation. Participants will wal k away with a starter kit of tools, methods, and resources for advocacy evaluation. Speakers: Gigi Barsoum, health policy specialist, The California Endowment Julia Coffman, senior consultant, Harvard Family Research Project Ehren Reed, senior associate, Innovation Network II: IS a.m. 8:00a.m. Continental Breakfast The Role of Communications in Advocacy 8:30a.m . Building Effective Relationships with State Government State governments have significant authority to regulate foundations and nonprofits, and make critical decisions about how programs and services will be funded and delivered. This session will examine the approaches taken in three different Midwestern states to build stronger relationships between the nonprofit community and state governments. Speakers: Karen Aldridge-Eason, foundation liaison to the governor, State of Michigan Laurel O'Sullivan, senior director, public policy, Donors Forum Jon Pratt, executive director, Minnesota Council of Non profits What communications strategies wi ll best enhance our lobbying and advocacy effo rts? This session w ill ex plore how various communications too ls-from traditional media to e-communicat ions to social networking-have helped or hindered nonprofits and fou ndations in conveying their value an d their policy positions effectively. Speakers: Candy Hill, senior vice president of social policy, Catholic C harities USA David Morse, vice president of communications, · Robert Wood Johnson Foundation 12:30 p.m. Wrap-Up and Adjournment 9:45 a.m. Break Challenging Times, New Opportunities 13 �Developing the next generation of nonprofit leaders is critical to the ability of charities and foundations to improve lives around the world. The 2009 NGen: Moving Nonprofit Leaders from Next to Now program brings together 200 talented professionals under the age of 40 for the following special sessions that will enhance their knowledge, expand their networks, and address issues of importance to them. Sponsored by the Annie E. Casey Foundation, CCS, and Commongood Careers The NGen program is free to under-40 conference participants who have pre-registered for each session. Please visit the registration counter to sign up. Tuesday, November 3 7:30-9:00 p.m. NGen Welcome Reception and Speed Networking (Location: LaSalle and Cadillac Rooms) NGen participants arriving in Detroit by Tuesday evening are invited to jumpstart the conference experience by meeting other emerging nonprofit leaders during a casual reception and structured networking event. Wednesday, November 4 8:00-8:45 a.m. NGen Orientation (Location: Cabot Room) The opening session will provide more details about the NGen program and its participants to set the stage for getting the most out of the conference. Facilitators: James Siegal, vice president of nonprofit sector programs and practice, Independent Sector Kristen Cambell, chair, Independent Sector NGen Advisory Group; program director, National Conference on Citizenship 9:00-1 0:00 a.m . NGen Workshops PlanningYour Career and Moving Up (Location: Richard Room) Are you new to the nonprofit sector or looking to move up in your organization? This practical and participatory workshop will provide you with tools for pursuing a meaningful, sustainable, and well-compensated career in the nonprofit sector. It will examine such strategies as.\defining core competencies, clarifying goals, pursuing professional development opportunities and graduate degrees, networking, and negotiating a competitive compensation package. Speakers: James Weinberg, founder and CEO, Commongood Careers Moderator: Kasey Gagnon, director of partnership development, Commongood Careers After Moving Up, What's Next? (Location: Brule Room) Many young leaders spend their early careers achieving their initial goals-becoming a senior manager, leaders, or starting an organization-only to wonder, "now what?" This session will answer that question by exploring: (I) · the skill sets needed to change fields or integrate into a new organization; (2) how to manage your personal brand apart from that of your organization; and (3) the role of peers and mentors in bolstering your career. Speakers: David Simms, managing partner, Bridgestar, The Bridgespan Group Michael Watson, senior vice president of human resources, Girl Scouts of the USA Moderator: Michael Smith, vice president of social innovation, The Case Foundation �NGEN: MOVING NONPROFIT LEADERS FROM NEXT TO NOW I 0: IS-II: IS a.m. NGen Workshops Fundraising Strategies for a Changing Economy II :30 a.m.- I :00 p.m. NGen Keynote Lunch (Location: Brule Room) It is critical in any economic environment to understand the practices that help charitable organizations maintain powerful fund raising programs. This session will analyze the current philanthropic landscape and provide a case study on a local innovative fund raising campaign. Join a discussion to learn best practices on how to adopt new, innovative fundraising strategies and position your organization for a successful future. Speakers: Kevin Cherep, vice president, CCS David Ripple, vice president for development and alumni affairs,Wayne State University Moderator: Dierk Hall, vice president, City Connect Detroit Working Effectively with Every Generation (Location: Richard Room) What tools do emerging leaders need to thrive in their organizations? How can they develop productive working relationships with both those they report to and those they supervise? Join this session for ideas on how to better understand multi-generational leadership within your organization, develop mutual mentoring and peer coaching opportunities, and structure work projects to meet your needs and the needs of your organization. Featured in this session will be a recent study by the Building Movement Project and ldealist.org, with support from the American Express Company, about ways to work more efficiently and effectively across generations. Speakers: Christine Rhee, manager, American Express Company Frances Kunreuther, director, Building Movement Project, Demos: A Network for Ideas and Action Moderator: Trish Tchume, director of civic engagement, Building Movement Project, Demos: A Network for Ideas and Action (Location: Cabot Room) Connect with your NGen ·colleagues at an inspiring keynote presentation prior to the start of the main conference. This will also be the first opportunity for participants to engage with established IS leaders serving as NGen Ambassadors throughout the conference. Emcee: Brian Gallagher, chair, Independent Sector; president and CEO, United Way Worldwide Speakers: Richard Brown, vice president of philanthropy, American Express Company Rev. Peg Chemberlin, executive director, Minnesota Council of Churches; president-elect, National Council of Churches J.D. Hokoyama, vice chair, Independent Sector; president and CEO, Leadership Education for Asian Pacifies Keynote Speaker: Joshua DuBois, executive director, White House Office of Faith-Based and Neighborhood Partnerships Friday, November 6 8:00- 9:00 a.m. NGen Closing Breakfast (Location: Cadillac Room) Join you r NGen colleagues and IS president and CEO Diana Aviv to examine what you've learned during the conference and explore ideas for building on your conference experience. Facilitator: C?iana Aviv, president and CEO, Independent Sector NGen participants have opportunities to network with NGen Ambassadors, established leaders who have agreed to serve as a resource to the next generation of leaders during the conference. In addition to table discussions at the Keynote Lunch on Wednesday, NGen participants and Ambassadors are encouraged to gather near the NGen Lounge during the conference-wide Wine and Cheese Reception on Thursday, 5:30-7:00 p.m. The NGen Lounge, a place for emerging leaders to connect, recharge, and share, is located in the exhibit hall. Challenging Times, New O pportunities IS �I WEDNESDAY, NOVEMBER 4 '-~ CONFERENCE SCHEDULE I I :30 a.m.-12:30 p.m. IS New Member Orientation 8:00- 8:45 a.m . NGen Orientation (Location: Nicolet Room) Learn more about Independent Sector and how t o get involved.This orientation is both for new members and those considering joining. Please see page 14 for more details. 9:00- 11: IS a.m. NGen Workshops Please see pages 14-1 5 for more details. 9:30- 1 I:00 a.m . Strategic Development Activities in a Troubled Economy Facilitators: Michael Piraino, ch ief executive officer, National CASA Luz Vega-Marquis, secretary, Independent Sector; president and CEO, Marguerite Casey Foundation I I :30 a.m.- I:00 p.m. NGen Keynote Lunch Please see page IS for more details. (Location: Nicolet Room) Pre-conference session for CMF-member community foundations With the economic downturn, community foundations are experiencing increased demand for services and grantmaking at a time of smaller asset values and decreased funding. This session will explore strategic ways to raise funds that provide the resources t o address the needs of the regions your community foundation serves. Speaker: Robin Ferriby, vice president, philanthropic services, Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan I0:00-1 I:00 a.m. Newcomers Conference Orientation (Location: Marquette Room) Join an orientation to the "meeting ground" provided by the IS/CMF conference and get a head start on the issues on the agenda for the next three days. Facilitators: Hassan Jaber, executive di rector, Arab Community Cent e r for Economic and Social Services Mariam No land, IS board member; president, Community Foundation for Southeast Mich igan Sherry Rockey, vice president of organization effectiveness, Independent Sector 16 Challe nging Time s, New Oppo rtunitie s ��c 4:30-6:00 p.m. BREAKOUT SESSIONS (CONTINUED) Wha Work :As s and Achieving Impact (Location: Ambassador Salon 2) Format: ldeaZLab Join a wide-ranging conversation on how individual organizations, and our community as a whole, can focus on activities that have the greatest impact.While financial pressures are forcing organizations of every size and miss ion to re-evaluate allocation of limited time an d resources, donors and other stakeholders are increasingly looking to nonprofits and foundations for reliable information on the impact oftheir work.This session will examine how organizations assess what's working- and what's not- and adapt their work accordingly. Discussion Leaders: Anan Ameri, director, Arab American National Museum Phil Buchanan, president, The Center for Effective Philanthropy Laura Callanan, philanthropy practice expert, McKinsey & Company Daniel Cardinali, president, Communities In Schools James Firman, president and CEO,The National Council on Aging Inca Mohamed, executive director, Management Assistance Group Heather Peeler, managing director, Community Wealth Ventures Andreas Rickert, director, Bertelsmann Foundation Facilitator: Jacob Harold, program officer,The William and Flora Hewlett Foundation wersation with Diana Aviv (Location: LaSalle A) The CEO Track is open to heads of IS and CMF member organizations. Participan~s must register for each session. Join IS president and CEO Diana Aviv for a wide-ranging discussion about current and future conditions in the nonprofit and philanthropic community, including our role in shaping a better future . S e e Diana Aviv, president and CEO, Independent Sector Brian Gallagher, chair, Independent Sector; president and CEO, United Way Worldwide CEO Track: The Evolving Role o o p of ards (Location: LaSalle B) , The CEO Track is open to heads of IS and CMF member ·' organizations. Participants must register for each session. Are the fundamental responsibilities and composition of nonprofit boards evolving in response to changing times? As expectations of an organization increase, its board must adapt its work to current conditions. The demographic and economic shifts in American society suggest that members of a board should also look different and provide new skills and knowledge to a 21st century organization.Take part in a wide-ranging disc ussion that examines these areas. S ea ers. Neel Hajra, president and CEO, Nonprofit Enterprise at Work John Morning, trustee, Charles Stewart Matt Foundation Lorie Slutsky, IS board member; president,The New York Community Trust ode r Linda Crompton, president and CEO, BoardSource Wednesday, November 4, 7:00-9:00 p.m. Host Reception at the Detroit Institute of Arts Reconnect with colleagues and meet new ones while exploring the Detroit Institute of Arts, America's fifth largest museum of fine arts. Within the DIA's newly renovated and expanded building, attendees will enjoy galleries featuring American and Impressionist art, a photography exhibit by Richard Avedon, the elegant Great Hall, and the Detroit Industry fresco cycle by Mexican muralist Diego Rivera, the finest example of his work in the United States. We are pleased to present a special performance by the Detroit Symphony Orchestra, sponsored by the John S. and James L. Knight Foundation. Buses begin leaving from the hotel Motor Coach Lobby at 6:30 p.m. Please see page 9 for more details. 20 Challenging Times, New Opportunities �THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5 7: 15-8:30 a.m. 9:45-11: IS a.m. Breakfast Buffet BREAKOUT SESSIONS (Location: Renaissance Foyer) Avoiding Family Foundation Missteps: Policies and Tools for Good Governance 7:45-8:30 a.m. IS Annual Members' Meeting and Breakfast (Location: Columbus Room) Help set the direct ion of the Independent Sector coalition for the coming year, vote on board members, and hear updates on impo rtant IS activities. The agenda will be distributed at the meeting. CMFAnnual Members' Meeting and Breakfast (Location: Cabot Room) CM F members are invited t o gather to elect new CMF trustees and hear reports on finances and accomplishments. (Location: Marquette Room) This session features the outstanding " CMF Family Foundation Players," a five person acti ng troupe co mposed of trustees from diffe rent family foundations, who were a big hit at the 2008 annual conference. Misst eps of t he fictional Jordan Family Foundation at it s annual board meeting wi ll help attendees learn the policies to practice and the tools to use for good governance. Speaker: Marguerite G riffin, senior vice president and national director of philanthropic services, Nort hern Trust Bank By 2020, Nonprofits Facilitate Broad Civic Engagement that Fuels Our Democracy (Location: Ontario Hall- West) Format: FutureLab FutureLabs are designed to help nonproftts and foundations chart a course to increase dramatically our impact by 2020. How do we get here? C ivic engagement, vo lunt eering, communit y problem solvi ng, voter mobilization, and polit ical participat ion have increased exponentially in the last decade.The result is an active citizen ry regularly involved in public de bate on issues of local, national, and international concern, pushing government at all levels to become more proact ive in seeking and responding to communit y input. D riving much of this progress have been nonprofits and foundations, which have coordinated and strengthe ned formerly disparate civic engagement efforts, and significantly broadened the scope and reach of civic engagement activities. Sponsored by the john S. and james L. Knight Foundation Moderator: Miles Rapoport, president, Demos: A Network for Ideas and Action Challenging Times, New Opportunities 21 �9:45- 11 : 15 a.m . BREAKOUT SESSIONS (CONTINU ED) Forging the Nonprofit Community's o ic Pr"o 1 0 0 (Location: Ambassador Salon 2) Format: ldeaZLab Corporate Philanthropy: o o r for ation T he legislative and policy decisions Congress and the new administration will make in the year ahead will have a tremendous impact on t he work of foundations and (Location: Ambassador Salon 3) Format: lnsightXChange Even before t he global economic cris is diminished resou rces, co r porate philanthropy was facing increased pressures to demonstrate social impact. Examine how the business community can move beyond today's economic and political dis r uptions and support the work of non profits in commun ities around the world. This discussion wi ll also identify exceptional opportunities for collaboration between the pr ivate sector and the nonprofit community. SpeakersRichard Brown, vice president, philanthropy, A merican Express Company Evan Hochberg, national director of community involvement, Deloitte & Touche USA, L.L.P. Ker ry Herlihy Sullivan, president, Bank of America C haritable Foundation Dennis W hite, president and CEO, Metlife Foundation Moderator: Charles Moore, executive di rect or, Committee Encou raging Corporat e Philanthropy D versity Management and Inclusive Culture as a Vehicle for Creating Excellence in Organizations: rom Vision to Action (Location: Nicolet Room) This working session will help participants understand how to transform their vision of diversity management and inclusive culture and provide them with too ls for creat ing strategic diversity management pr actices in their organization. T he session is designed around five key stages: r eflection, awareness and assessment; strategy building; creating an inclusive culture; building capabilities; and measuring impact. nonprofits. Hear per spect ives on the key issues facing our community-tax refor m, re-defining tax exemption, lobbying rights, the estate tax, charit able giving incentives, nonprofit capacity-bu ilding-and help shape t he policy priorities for our comm unit y. Sponsored by lies Group at Merrill Lynch Discussion Leaders. Cecilia Garcia, executive director, Benton Foundation AudreyTayse Haynes, senior vice president and chief government affairs officer, YM CA of t he USA 'Chuck Marr, director of feder al tax policy, Center on Budget and Policy Priorit ies D rummond Pike, founder and CEO ,T ides Center and Tides Foundation William Roberts, director of U.S. advocacy, T he Atlantic Philanthropies Douglas Rutzen, president, Int ernational Center for N ot-For-Profit Law Jay Spector, president and CEO,J EVS Facilitator: Kyle Caldwell, president and C EO, Michigan Nonprofit Association Improving Urban Food Deserts: . Local Agriculture, Food Rescue, and Better Public Policy (Location: Richard Room) Hear from a panel of experts who will discuss better public policy for complementary strategies that include the charitable food supply; food rescue; access to fresh, high-nutrition and locally grown food; and food as a public benefit. Speakers: Speaker. Lynn Wooten, cl inical associate professor, St ephen M. Ross School of Business, University of Michigan Moderator. Susan Goodell, executive director, Forgotten Harvest Rebecca Salminen W itt, president, Greening of Detroit Oran Hester man, president and CEO, Fair Food Network Moderator: Guy Williams, principal, G.O.Wi lliams &Assoicates, L. L.C. Sylvest er Jones, progr am officer, Ruth Matt Foundation 22 Challenging Times, New Opportunitie s �THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5 Nonprofit Surv1val Strategies (Location: Ambassador Salon I) Format: PechaKucha Nonprofits today are facing unprecedented challenges that are fo rcing them to adapt in order to survive and th rive. Hear practical, t hought-p rovoking ideas for leading and managing during an economic crisis, and engage in deep dialogue about how we can maximize our impact despite the o dds. Discuss on Leaders: Dione Alexander, vice president of the midwest region, Non profit Finance Fund To ni Heineman, executive director, A Home Withi n Stephen Hoffm an, president and C EO, Jewish C om munity Federation of Cleveland Jane Smith, executive di rector, Center for Leadership and C ivic Engagement, Spelman College Rick Sperling, founder and C EO, Mosaic Youth Theatre of Detroit Facil"tato : Bill Strathmann, chief executive officer, Network fo r Good CEO Summit: Innovative Leadership, Crit"caiThin ·ng for Critical Times (Location: Cadillac Room) The CEO Track is open to heads of IS and CMF member organizations. Participants must register for each session. T he turbu lent economy is forci ng CEO s to find innovative ways to sustain their organizations an d deliver powerful results. Often the best path comes not from leading through constriction but by choosing a more expansive way of thinking and acting. Join David Horth, an expert on the confluence of design, creativity, and leadership, to learn how t o ach ieve strategic growth through new methods and explore tools, techniques, and processes for t ransforming ideas into innovation practice. Speaker: David Magellan Horth, senior designer, Center for Creative Leadersh ip Moderator: Gene Cochrane, Jr., president, The Duke Endowment Challe ngingTimes, New Opport unities 23 �The Nonprofit Community and Health Care Reform 2:00- 3:30 p.m. BREAKOUT SESS IONS How Can Volunteers Help Your Organization? Or Is That The Wrong Question? (Location: Ambassador Salon I) Format: PechaKucha At a time when nonprofits are struggling with limited resources, the economic crisis has flooded the market with potential volunteers. The Serve America Act has also created an increased momentum for volunteerism. How can we ensure that this wave of volunteerism and the enthusiasm it generates lead to greater impact for organizations and their mission areas? Discussion Leaders: Greg Baldwin, president,VolunteerMatch AnnMaura Connolly, chief external affairs officer and senior vice president, City Year Brian Gallagher, chair, Independent Sector; president and CEO, United Way Worldwide Ketny Jean-Francois, board co-chair, CommunityVoices Heard Lester Strong, chief executive officer, Experience Corps Sondra Youdelman, executive director, Community Voices Heard Facilitator: Michael Balaoing, senior vice president of programs, Entertainment Industry Foundation CEO Track: Organizational and Executive Compensation (Location: LaSalle B) The CEO Track is open to heads of IS and CMF member organizations. Participants must register for each session. Creating an effective compensation system is difficult even when times are good-and it's even harder now. Learn how to develop comprehensive compensation systems that work for the organization, your executives, and your staff's career development. Speakers: Charles Quatt, president, Quatt Associates Sally Sterling, consultant, Spencer Stuart Moderator: Susan Berresford, IS board member 24 (Location: Ambassador Salon 3) Format: lnsightXChange Many proposals. have been advanced to fix our broken health care system, and Congress is moving ahead to implement changes. What will these changes mean for the work of non profits and foundations as employers, as providers of health and human services, or as advocates for disease prevention and improved health? Join this discussion for an update on the latest on health care reform and the work that lies ahead. Sponsored by lies Group at Merrill Lynch Speakers: Juan Figueroa, president, Universal Health Care Foundation of Connecticut John Rother, executive vice president of policy, AARP John Seffrin, chief executive officer,Amercan Cancer Society Moderator: Ralph Neas, chief executive officer, The National Coalition on Health Care CEO Track: Organizational Restructuring in Turbulent Times (Location: LaSalle A) The CEO Track is open to heads of IS and CMF member organizations. Participants must register for each session. Financial realities are forcing CEOs to consider restructuring their organizations in order to survive. T his session looks at the key issues to consider in making such decisions, what can be done to mitigate undesirable effects of lay-offs, mergers, closures, and whether there are less drastic alternatives. Speakers: Sterling Speirn, CM F board member; president and CEO, W.K. Kellogg Foundation Jeanne Bell, executive director, CompassPoint Nonprofit Services Moderator: Ralph Everett, IS board member; president and CEO, Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Challenging Times, New Opportunities �THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5 2:00- 5:00 p.m . BREAKOUT SESSION 2:00- 5:30 p.m. WORKSHOPS By 2020, Non profits Lead the Way on Inclusion Advanced Practice vti jafl J ffe (Location: Ontario Hall- West) Format: FutureLab FutureLabs are designed to help nonprofits and foundations chart a course to increase dramatically our impact by 2020. (Location: Nicolet Room) Nonprofit and foundation leaders, whether seasoned or new to their positions, often find themselves in challenging situations with high stakes and no easy answers.This advanced practice workshop will help you tune up to: (I) Recognize soft challenges, situations that have no technical solutions and leave even experienced practitioners feeling confused or ineffective; (2) Draw on a new framework for effective personal strategy-using the linked concepts of role, self, and system; and (3) Think and work like a natural by using a framework that makes the tacit strategies of high ly effective leaders explicit and accessible. How do we get here? Nonprofits have activated new and existing networks to ensure that staff, board members, volunteers, and donors represent the rich diversity of our country and world. Expanded leadership pipelines have been key to this new culture of inclusion. In addition, organizations are working together in innovative ways and benefitting from breaking down barriers such as geography and mission-area silos. For example, U.S. nonprofits are better integrated with the international N GO community and coordination has increased between faith-based and secular groups. By fundamentally rebuilding the way we recruit individuals and connect organizations, the nonprofit community has powerfully increased our individual and collective impact, and become a model for the nation as a whole. Sponsored by the john S. and James L. Knight Foundation Moderator: Kyle Caldwell, president and CEO , Michigan Nonprofit Association rkshop ~\ Speaker: Jan Jaffe , project leader, GrantCraft Better Presentations, Stronger Leadership (Location: Monet Room) Great leaders recognize how important powerful communication is to inspiring change. Join Bill Hoogterp, speaking coach to top executives around the world, for an interactive, entertaining training session that will strengthen your communication and presentation skills. Dramatically improve presentations and meetings by learning how the brain processes information and how to engage and "listen to" an audience. Participants wi ll practice concrete techniques individually and in pairs and teams, receiving feedback through video and group evaluation . peaker: Bill Hoogterp, chief executive officer, The LEAGUE Advanced registration required. Please visit the registration counter. IS/CMF Members: $1 00; Non-members: $120 Challe nging Times, New Opportunitie s 25 �2:00-5:30 p.m. SITE SESSIONS Pre-registration required. Please visit the registration counter to sign. Transportation will depart from the Marriott Renaissance Hotel Motor Lobby. Creativity-A Corridor for Integrating New and Old (Location Offsite: University Cultural Center, Arts League of Ml, Detroit Economic Growth, College of Creative Studies, N'Namdi Gallery) Discover Detroit's creative corridor with multiple stops at cultural institutions, art districts and the new design school at the College of Creative Studies. Engage public officials, nonprofit leaders, and private developers on their experiences in developing public/private partnerships to build out the corridor. A panel discussion with CEOs of Detroit's leading cultural institutions will wrap up the tour. During the tour, participants will hear from the following chief executives: Sue Mosey, CEO, University Cultural Center; Oliver Ragsdale, CEO, Arts League of Michigan; George Jackson, CEO, Detroit Economic Growth; Rick Rogers, CEO , College of Creative Studies; and George R. N 'Namdi, CEO, N' Namdi Gallery. Limited to 50 participants-pre-registration required Speakers: Graham Beal, chief executive officer, The Detroit Institute of Arts Bob Bury, executive director and C EO , Detroit Historical Society Maud Lyon, chief executive officer, Cultural Alliance of Southeastern Michigan Juanita Moore, president and CEO, C. H.Wright Museum of African American History Kevin Prihod, chief executive officer, Detroit Science Center Moderator: Laura Trudeau, program director, The Kresge Foundation Immigration-Everybody Counts in our Revitalization (Location Offsite: Freedom House) This session will discuss the burgeoning philanthropic interest in the link between immigration and city-wide revitalization arid explore how philanthropy can play a catalytic role in starting the engine of private investment that is intimately connected to the welcoming of immigrants. A tour of either the Southwest or Hamtramck communities will be included. Limited to 50 participants-pre-registration required. Speakers: Jonathan Bowles, director, Center for an Urban Future Sam Singh, senior policy consultant, Public Policy Associates Rosemary Smith, chief executive officer, The Kitchener and Waterloo Community Foundation Steve Tobocman, co-director, Michigan Foreclosure Task Force, Community Economic Development \ Association of Michigan · Moderator: Edward Egnatios, senior program officer for good neighborhoods, Skillman Foundation The New (Green) Economy (Location Offsite: NextEnergy) The alignment of emerging industries, alternative and efficient energy opportunities, and the state's natural resources and manufacturing infrastructure make Michigan a prime location for a new, green economy. Business opportunities and job creation in fields across the energy spectrum-including smart grid/smart home efficiencies; nuclear and cleaner coal technologies; and alternative wind, solar, and battery sources-are poised t o strengthen a culture of lasting entrepreneurialism in Detroit and Michigan. Join us at NextEnergy, a Detroit Tech Town center of alternative energy excellence and Michigan's leading alternative and renewable energy business incubator and accelerator, to hear from Michigan's green energy leadership. Limited to 50 participants-pre-registration required Speakers: Keith Cooley, chief executive officer, NextEnergy Lois DeBacker, program director, The Kresge Foundation Kate Gordon, vice president for energy policy, C enter for American Progress Steven Kurmas, president, Detroit Edison Moderator: David Egner, C MF board member; president and CEO, Hudson-Webber Foundation 26 Challenging Time s, New Opportunities �THURSDAY, NOVEMBER S Navigating the Economic Recovery Reclaiming Community Assets (Location Offsite: Federal Reserve Bank) This session will tour the Federal Reserve building in Detroit, which was the first federal building constructed after September I I. Following the tour the local Federal Reserve economist will provde insight into the latest federal policies and how they might affect the economy. Two concurrent investment sessions will take place during the final part of this visit. (Location Offsite: Rosedale Baptist Church, Brightmoor Community) Reclaiming vacant and abandoned land is integral to the success of community dev~ lopment initiatives all across Detroit.Vacant and abandoned property could be the city's biggest asset, if it is reclaimed, redeveloped and returned to productive use.We'll visit the Brightmoor Community to learn how it has created a land-use plan to respond to the staggering amount of vacant land. Limited to I 00 participants-pre-registration required. Limited to 50 participants--pre-registration required Speakers: Speaker: Samuel Kahan, senior economist, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago's Detroit Branch Moderator: Stephen Nedwicki, relationship manager for foundations, Comerica Bank Topic I: Navigating the Financial Crisis 2009 This session will focus on the impact of the 2008 recession. It will address implications of the Investment Policy Statement on current asset allocation targets and the effects on spending policies. The session will offer insights to investment committee members on riskreturn metrics and their application in today's financial markets. Speakers: Alan Ochalek, vice president, Comerica Asset Management Ashok Rajan, director of investment management and guidance, Merrill Lynch Moderator: Scott Schropp, vice president of investments, lies Family Conservation Scholarship Fund Topic 2: Economic Recovery-Are We There Yet? The recession of 2008-2009 has taken a tremendous toll on the local, national, and global economies. Are we poised for a recovery or does our trip through these difficult times still have a ways to go? Join leading economists in discussing the road map to recovery for the state, the country, and the world. Speakers: Dana Johnson, chief economist, Comerica Bank Mark Perry, professor of economics and finance, University of Michigan School of Management AI Bogdan, principal and owner, AAB Development Strategies, LLC John O'Brien, executive director, Northwest Detroit Neighborhood Development Dan Pitera, executive director, Detroit Collaborative Design Center Jerome Warfield, pastor and chair, Mount Vernon Missionary Baptist Church Moaerator: Tonya Allen, vice president of programs, Skillman Foundation Water is the New Oil (Location Offsite: Dossin Great Lakes Museum) Globally, water supplies are strained by pollution and population growth and threatened by climate change. The Great Lakes contain 20 percent of the world's fresh surface water. Learn how existing and proposed Great Lakes water policies respond to issues including climate change, green energy, water quality, and water rights. Are these policies adequate? What are the political, economic and social implications? How can the pol icymaking process be improved? Join us at the Dossin Great Lakes Museum (on Belle Isle Park, a Frederick Law Olmstead-designed island park in the Detroit River and the largest island park in the U.S.) for this fascinating and timely discussion. Limited to 50 participants--pre-registration required Speakers: James Clift, policy director, Michigan Environmental Council Tim Eder, executive director, Great Lakes Commission Maureen Taylor, chair, Michigan Welfare Rights Organization Moderator: Moderator: Jonathan Hohn, assistant vice president, Citizens Banking Corporation Charitable Foundation Jodee Fishman Raines, vice president of programs, Erb Family Foundation Challenging Times, New Opportunities 27 �~ ~': THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 5 i 4:00- 5:30 p.m . BREAKOUT SESSIONS Leadership that Cultivates Innovation Advocacy, Coalitions, Communications: What Does ltTake to Change Policies and Practices? (Location: Ambassador Salon I) Format: PechaKucha What are the most effective approaches for changing the behavior of individuals and communities? When does change result from changing public opinions, and when does it require changing public policy? Explore the power of new approaches to communications, coalition building, and advocacy that are shifting the ways foundations and nonprofits are creating positive changes in behaviors and practices. Sponsored by lies Group at Merrill Lynch Discussion Leaders: Sharlonda Buckman, executive director, Detroit Parent Network Ann Christiano, senior communications officer, Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Maya Enista, chief executive officer, Mobilize.org Andre Oliver, consultant, Cause Communications Nina Ozlu Tunceli, chief counsel of government and public affairs, Americans for the Arts Facilitator: Marta Tellado, vice president for communications, Ford Foundation CEO Track: Nonprofit CEO Renewal (Location: LaSalle A, B) The CEO Track is open to heads of IS and CMF member organizations. Participants must register for each session. Nonprofit CEOs face mounting challenges, both personal and professional. Coping with the pressures that accompany the making of tough decisions is crucial if you are to avoid burn-out while managing your staff, clients, and organization's future . Explore stress management techniques to help you cope with the responsibilities that come with being a CEO. Speaker: Sandra Finkel, manager of stress management services and executive health program, University of Michigan Cardiovascular Center Moderator: (Location: Ambassador Salon 2) Format: lnsightXChange A culture of innovatio.n can help maximize organizational impact-but cr,eating that atmosphere is a challenge.This session will examine how, at a time of great uncertainty, nonprofit leaders can encourage and manage innovation within their organizations in order to overcome challenges and maximize impact. Speakers: Michele Jolin , senior advisor for social innovation, The Domestic Policy Councii,White House Trabian Shorters, vice president of communities program, John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Kim Syman, managing partner and director of the Action Tank, New Profit Lynne Vaughan, senior vice president and chief innovation officer, YMCA of the USA Moderator: Edward Henry, president and CEO, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation Working Effectively with the Administration (Location: Ambassador Salon 3) Format: lnsightXChange The Obama administration has implemented many changes in the ways the executive branch interacts w ith private philanthropy and nonprofits.What do these changes really mean for our community and the people we serve? How can we best ensure that all parts of our community are able to share their ideas and concerns with the administration? Can we overcome the inherent tensions among our competing political and social agendas to work most effectively with the administration? Sponsored by lies Group at Merrill Lynch Speakers: Eric Rodriguez, vice president, Office of Research, Advocacy and Legislation, National Council of La Raza, Rev. Larry Snyder, IS board member; president, Catholic Charities USA Luz Vega-Marquis, secretary, Independent Sector; president and CEO, Marguerite Casey Foundation Moderator: Ellen Alberding, IS board member; president, The Joyce Foundation Ruth Wooden, IS board member; president, Public Agenda 28 Challe nging Times, New Opportunities �THURSDAY, NOVEMBER S 5:30-7:00 p.m. Wine and Cheese Reception 9:00- 1 I :00 p.m. (Location: Ontario Exhibit Hall-East) This must-attend networking event provides light hors d'oeuvres and the opportunity to make new connections. It will highlight ideas that have emerged from an online conversation hosted by the firm lmaginatik about how the sector can increase its impact; attendees can try out this tool by sharing their opinions on. key ideas for the future of the sector. After Hours Social Event (Location: Cabot Room), Meeting, mingling and Motown! "Get Ready" for a musically-inspired after hours event that invites you to relax, unwind and reconnect with colleagues. Thursday, November 5 7:00-9:00 p.m. (Location: Columbus Room) john W. Gardner Leadership Dinner How are the leaders of the charitable community demonstrating impact? This evening celebrates exceptional nonprofit leaders and recognizes the remarkable achievements of John W Gardner, Independent Sector's founding chair and a champion in the areas of philanthropy, education, and politics. Independent Sector presents the award each year to an individual whose leadership in or with the nonprofit community has been transformative and who has mobilized and unified people, institutions, and causes that improve people's lives. Independent Sector will honor Geoffrey Canada, president and CEO of Harlem Children's Zone, with the 2009 John W. Gardner Leadership Award in recognition of his groundbreaking success in helping children and families in Central Harlem to break the cycle of generational poverty. The dinner will also feature the presentation of the American Express Building Leadership Award to Community Voices Heard, which empowers low-income people in New York City and state to advocate for public policy changes that improve their lives. Entertainment provided by the Mosaic Youth Theatre of Detroit Presenters: Margwerite Kondracke, IS board member; president and CEO, America's Promise Alliance Rev. Larry Snyder, IS board member; president, Catholic Charities USA limcee: Debbie Dingell, co-chair, Annual Conference Host Committee Invocation: Imam Mohammad Mardini, American Muslim Center Remarks: Richard Brown, vice president of philanthropy, American Express Company Challe nging Times, New Opportunities 29 �8:00-9:00 a.m. BREAKOUT SESSION 8:00- 9:30 a.m . Continental Breakfast (8:00- 9:00 a.m. located in Ontario Hall East; 9:00-9:30 a.m. located in the Renaissance Foyer) 8:00-9:00 a.m . Hot Topic Round Table Discussions (Location Ontario Exhibit Hall- East) Join a roundtable discussion organ ized by one of your colleagues on a key issue facing the sector. Topics to date include: Are We Over-Thinking Board Governance? Jonathan Schick, president, GOAL Consulting and author, The Nonprofit Secret Corporate Representation on Nonprofit Boards Cultural Data- The Value of the Arts Communicating Goals and Strategies for Impact: f'lonprofit Effectiveness Advisory Group Meeting (Location: Brule Room) How can your organization better articulate how your short-term objectives and recent accomplishments are connected to your long-term goals and strategies for lasting, meaningful impact? Join this meeting of Independent Sector's Advisory Group on Nonprofit Effectiveness to discuss a new initiative to develop a common language and framework for organizations seeking to communicate what impact they seek to achieve, their strategies for achieving it, and how they assess their progress along the way.The meeting is open to all conference attendees. ·biscussion Leader: EngAGEment Initiative: A New Look on Aging Going to Scale- Ways to Work International Solutions to Organizational Challenges in Times of Crisis- Scott Beale, executive director, Atlas Service Corps James Firman, chair, Independent Sector Advisory Group on Nonprofit Effectiveness; president and CEO, The National Council on Aging 8:00-9:00 a.m. NGen Closing Breakfast Please see page IS for more details. K-12 Education and all that Stimulus Money Michigan Grantmakers for Women & Girls- Economic Security Campaign Mission-Focused Management in Tough Economic Times, Wm. Patrick Nichols, president, Transition Leadership International Nonprofits Online: How to Win Money and Mobilize People! Michael Smith, vice president of social innovation, Case Foundation; Kari Saratovsky, vice president of social innovation, Case Foundation; Kristin !vie, program associate of social innovation, Case Foundation Online Tools to Generate Collaboration and Inspiration- Peter Propp, vice president of marketing, lmaginatik 30 ChallengingTimes, New Opportunities �FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 6 9:30- 1 I :00 a.m . Corporate Philanthropy Programming Best Practices BREAKOUT SESSIONS The Bigger Picture (Location: Ontario Hall-West) Format: FutureLab FutureLabs are designed to help nonproftts and foundations chart a course to increase dramatically our impact by 2020. What do we want society to look like in 2020 and what will it take to get there? In this session, several thought leaders will offer specific goals for society in 2020 and identify what the nonprofit and philanthropic community will need to do to get us there. Key to this discussion will be identifying our sector's current blind spots and emerging opportunities-and ways to address them. Sponsored by the John $. and James L. Knight Foundation Moderator: Jeffrey Bradach, managing partner and co-founder, The Bridgespan Group Caring to Change-Enabling Enduring Social Improvements (Location: Marquette Room) How can today's foundations, which account for less than three percent of the nonprofit sector's annual revenue, have the greatest impact? How do we define our relationships with other institutions that share our values? Building on the results of more than I 00 interviews, join colleagues in an ongoing conversation about the continuous search for strategies that will help foundations better promote the common good. Speakers: Mark Rosenman, director, Caring to Change Tessie Guillermo, president and CEO , ZeroDivide Karen Zelermyer, Joint Affinity Group Jee Kim, program director, Surdna Foundation (Location: Richard Room) In order to respond to the changing needs of our communities it is especially important for funders to stay connected and support successful programming.This workshop, designed especially for corporate grantmakers, will cover best practices, insights and challenges associated with sustaining strong community initiatives from a dynamic presenter from the Kraft Corporation-a company with philanthropic contributions of $18.3M for hunger-relief, healthy lifestyles, humanitarian aid, and employee involvement programming. Speakers: N icole Robinson, senior manager of focused giving, Kraft Corporation Moderator: Carpline Chambers, president, Comerica Charitable Foundation CEO Track: Conversation with the Gardner Leadership Awardee-Geoffrey Canada (Location: LaSalle A) The CEO Track is open to heads of IS and CMF member organizations. Participants must register for each session. Join a conversation with 2009 Gardner Award recipient Geoffrey Canada and examine the promise of a comprehensive community strategy for poor children. Speaker: Geoffrey Canada, president and CEO, Harlem Children's Zone Interviewer: Edward Skloot, chair; IS Annual Conference Program C ommittee; IS board member; director, Center for Strategic Philanthropy and C ivil Society, Duke University Moderator: Nicholas Deychakiwsky, program offi cer, Charles Stewart Matt Foundation Challenging Time s, New Opportunitie s 31 �9:30-1 I:00 a.m . BREAKOUT SESSIONS (CONTINUED) The Road to Economic Recovery: What Do Foundations and Nonprofits Need to Do Now? Diversity in Nonprofit Leadership: Problems and Solutions (Location: Ambassador Salon 3) (Location: Ambassador Salon I) Format: PechaKu cha Despite our community's stated commitment to d iversity, women and people of color are underrepresented at the executive level of nonprofits and foundations. Hear provocative perspectives on the obstacles to diversifying our community's leadership, and consider methods for navigating or demolishing barriers. Speakers and Discussion Leaders: Gisselle Acevedo, president and CEO, Para Los Nines Susan Taylor Batten, president and CEO, Association of Black Foundation Executives Aaron Dorfman, executive director, National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy Jan Masaoka, director and editor-in-chief, Blue Avocado Paul Schmitz, chief executive officer, Public Allies Moderator: Barbara Arnwine, executive director, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law Family Foundations: Documenting Your Legacy (Location: Nicolet Room) It's important that family foundations permanently capture and document the history, origins and values of their founders. This session will present various methods and tools families can use such as capturing oral histories, creating historical exhibits, establishing a document archive and videotaping interviews of the founders . Attendees also will hear stories and see examples of what several family foundations have done. Speakers: Kristine Boll Mestdagh, executive director, John A. & Marlene L. Boll Foundation Heidi Connor, collections manager, Edward Lowe Foundation Kelley Hamilton, vice president of development, Detroit Public Television Moderator: Daniel Wyant, CMF board member; president and COO, Edward Lowe Foundation 32 Format: lnsightXChange The federal government has spent billions of dollars to help move our country out of the economic crisis. Where are we seeing signs of success? What gaps remain? This session will examine how nonprofits and foundations have worked with government and independently to advance economic recovery efforts, and how the lessons we have learned can point the way ahead to ensure that recovery reaches all communities. Sponsored by lies Group at Merrill Lynch Speakers: Joaquin Alvarado, senior vice president for diversity and innovation, Corporation for Public Broadcasting Ronn Richard, president and CEO, The Cleveland Foundation Geneva Williams, president and C EO, City Connect Detroit Moderator: Mariam Noland, IS board member; president, Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan Stars, Seals and Beyond: Getting Nonprofit Impact Ratings Right (Location: Ambassador Salon 2) Format: lnsightXChange How-beyond simple metrics of financial ratios o r program outputs-should nonprofit impact be measured? What is in sto re for the next generation of charity effectiveness rating systems? With revenues down but expectations up, impact continues to be the watchword of many charities and foundations . Join an insightful conversation as key leaders challenge current rating systems and discuss what is on the horizon for rating nonprofit impact. Speakers: Ken Berger, president and CEO, Charity Navigator Robert Ottenhoff, president and CEO, GuideStar USA Art Taylor, president and C EO, BBBWise Giving Alliance Moderator: Leslie Crutchfield, co-author of Forces for Good: The Six Practices of High-Impact Nonprofits, and philanthropic advisor, Arabella Philanthropic Investment Advisors Challe nging Time s, New Opportunities �Challenging Times, New Opportunities 33 �Recognizing that the leaders of tomorrow are already making important contributions today, Independent Sector launched the American Express NGen Fellows Program this year to honor 12 under-40 leaders at IS member organizations. Selected from more than 70 applicants, this accomplished and diverse inaugural cohort will collaborate on a six-month project, have opportunities to interact with seasoned leaders, and plat an even larger part in addressing critical challenges facing our communities. Supported by the American Express Foundation An unmet community need became a calling, and now Bridget Clark Whitney provides daily "sack suppers" to hundreds of food-insecure children in Kent County, ~==::!~ Michigan. Bridget is executive director of Kids' Food Basket. For David McKinney, leadership means managing for results and producing change by engaging thousands of talented young adults to create community solutions. David is vice ....,.._ _.,.......~ president of programs for Public Allies. An eye for innovation helped Kevin Bolduc lead the design of the Center for Effective Philanthropy's groundbreaking Grantee Perception Report. Kevin is CEP's vice ....;;;,;:..__.;;..;.;.;;.......~: president of assessment tools. Larry Smith has guided the Third Millennium Initiative to strengthen efforts to involve youth, women, and people of color in philanthropic leadership. Larry is director of I..;;;;;;;;;;..::;;.;_...J the Third Millennium Initiative at the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University. An experienced nonprofit CEO at age 26, Maya Enista encourages and inspires the millennia! generation to contribute to civic conversation and participate in the _ _ _ _.... political process. Maya is chief executive officer of Mobilize.org. The aftermath of Hurricane Katrina revealed the even greater daily damage caused by poverty, and Monica Maggiano now works to educate, _ __ .......J inform, and inspire citizens to respond to meet the needs of low-income people. Monica is director of the Campaign to Reduce Poverty in America for Catholic Charities USA. 34 Neel Hajra incorporates insights from the private and government sectors to support the success of the nonprofit community in areas such as governance, technology, ,;;;;;;;;,..,;;;;~;;..~ and resources. Nee I is president and chief executive officer of Nonprofit Enterprise at Work (NEW). Rahsaan Harris has employed grantmaking, programs, and education to advance social justice principles in philanthropy, with a particular focus on racial equity. Rahsaan is a ,;;;;;;;;.;...;;;;;,,;;;;;;;;.J program executive at The Atlantic Philanthropies. A firm believer in the benefits of collaboration, Roopal Saran leads efforts to match funders and child-serving nonprofits in order to provide all children great places _...;..;_;;;;.....;;;;.~ to play. Roopal is director of client services for KaBOOM! Scott Beale used his years of international experience to develop an innovative fellowship program that enables nonprofit leaders to work in other countries. Scott is : =: ;=.. CEO and founder of Atlas Service Corps. Toby Chalberg pushed his organization to become involved in public policy, helping it participate in the development of proposals signed into law as part of the Serve America _......;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;,.s Act this year.Toby is chief strategy officer and vice president of Points of Light Institute. As an employee and as a volunteer, Trish Tchume seeks to support and connect individuals and organizations that are working for social change.Trish is director of .;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;;.a civil engagement at the Building Movement Project (Demos). ChallengingTimes, New Opportunities �is proud to partner with .: and to support the and ' 1 I Recognizing the significance of strong leadership in the nonprofit sector, American Express is focused on ~ supporting best methods, programs and partners that ~ train high potential emerging leaders to tackle II - impo~tant issues in the 21st century. �MARKETPLACE EXHIBITORS (Ontario Exhibit Hall) Accenture Commongood Careers (Booth# 405) Accenture is a global management consulting, technology services and outsourcing company. We are the ideal ally to bring leading practices into nonprofits' operations, to improve the lives of individuals based on better execution and real, measurable performance- turning vision into reality for nonprofits. www.accenture.com/nonprofit (Booth # 209) Commongood Careers enables today's most innovative nonprofits to build strong organizations through the recruitment, n:;tention, and development of outstanding talent. Founded and staffed by nonprofit professionals, Commongood Careers offers personalized, engaged services to jobseekers and organizations, as well as access to a wealth of information about careers in the social sector. www.cgcareers.org AARP/Office ofVolunteer & Civic Engagement (Booth # 403) AARP Create The Good is a volunteer and civic engagement network of programs, ideas and opportunities- for people with any amount of time to give. Organizations are invited to post opportunities at CreateTheGood.org. With a wealth of skills, experiences and energy,AARP members, families and friends are eager to help! www.aarp.org Bizdom (Booth # 40 I) Bizdom U is an entrepreneurial development program that Dan Gilbert opened in the city of Detroit. Our mission is to train aspiring entrepreneurs to launch innovative, growth-oriented, Detroit-based businesses. www.bizdom.com Common Grants (Booth # 202) Wh ile many services focus on raising money from donors, CommonGrants was launched to help nonprofits improve their fundraising success with Grantmakers. The CommonGrants Platform matches your organization with Grantmakers that are likely to fund your program and allows you to apply to all of them with a single application. · www.commongrants.com Council of Michigan Foundations (Booth # 303) Visit the Council of Michigan Foundations booth to learn about membership and programs, sign up for special services for members, and discuss how you can be more involved. www.michiganfoundations.org Bromelkamp Company ForeSee Results (Booth # 304) More than just software, Bromelkamp Company supports grantmakers through technology and advice that enables effectiveness and innovation . Distinguished by unparalleled technical support, our Pearl database products are user-modifiable, customizable and fully integrated. Our online donor statements and online grant applications communicate directly with your constituents. www.bromelkamp.com (Booth# 406) ForeSee Results is the market leader in using online voice-of-customer data to help organizations increase website satisfaction, loyalty and value. Using the methodology of the University of Michigan's American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI), ForeSee Results identifies the improvements to websites with the greatest ROI. With more than a quarter of a billion of completed customer surveys, 30+ benchmarks and nearly 600 online measures across dozens of industries, ForeSee Results' nonprofit clients include AARP, Goodwill Industries, Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Memorial SloanKettering Cancer Center. ForeSee Results is located in Ann Arbor, Michigan. www.ForeSeeResults.com Comerica Bank (Booth # 307) Comerica Bank is a diversified financial services company founded in 1849.We offer a broad array of Master Trust, Custody and Investment Management services, but we're also very aware of the unique issues facing foundations and nonprofit organizations. Let us tell you about our solutions tailored specifically to your industry. www.comerica.com 36 Cha lle ngi ng Times, New Oppo rtunities �Fund Evaluation Group (FEG) lmaginatik (Booth# 404) Fund Evaluation Group (FEG) provides objective investment advice and outsourced asset management to assist institutional investors in achieving their investment decisions.With more than 20 years of experience, FEG assist s clients with asset allocation & portfolio construction, investment manager due diligence & searches, and enhancing their fiduciary oversight. www.feg.com (Booth # 208) lmaginatik is the leading provider of Innovation Management and Collective Intelligence solutions. The best companies in t~e world use our consulting services and software platfo rm to identify and develop the important ideas and strategies that will drive the future of their business. www.lmaginatik.com. ldeaEncore Network (Booth # 305) ldeaEncore Network is an online learning marketplace for nonprofits to share, buy and sell information resources (e.g.: policies, how-to manuals, presentations, plans, spreadsheet templates, etc.) that improve their effectiveness and efficiency. By aligning individual and organizational incentives, including earned income, we reduce "reinvention of the wheel" and increase both the social and financial return on philanthropic investment. www.ldeaEncore.com lies Group at Merrill Lynch (Booth # 206) The lies/Brice Consulting Group provides independent, nonproprietary consulting and advisory service to nonprofits, endowments and foundations within the Michigan nonprofit sector. Merrill Lynch's institutional consulting services are designed to support virtually the entire portfolio management process. In addition, our group provides board and donor educational programs on philanthropic trends and planned giving. www.ml.com Independent Sector (Booth # 20 I) Independent Sector is the leadership forum for charities, foundations, and corporate giving programs committed to advancing the common good in America and around the world. Our nonpartisan coalition of approximately 600 organizations leads, strengthens, and mobilizes the charitable community in order to fulfill our vision of a just and inclusive society and a healthy democracy of active citizens, effective institutions, and vibrant communities. wwW>independentsector.org IPEX (Booth# 204) IPEX-Investment Performance Evaluation Xperts-is an independent, full service, investment consulting firm . IPEX advises foundations in evaluating their investment programs, thereby ensuring that they fulfill their fiduciary responsibilities. IPEX maintains no affiliation with any money manager or brokerage firm , enabling the firm to maintain complete objectivity. www.ipexusa.com lssueLab (Booth # 207) lssueLab is an open access archive for nonprofit research. Our mission is to help non profits and foundations more effectively share their knowledge through open licensing, digital archiving solutions, and online dissemination. Search, download, and c"ontribute research today. www.issuelab.org Lawrence Technological University Making a difference in the community one client at a time. quickenloans.com (Booth # 21 0) Lawrence Technological University Lawrence Technological University in Southfield, Mich., is a premier private university providing superior education through innovative programs, cutting-edge technology, small class sizes, and a commitment to theory and practice. Its Center for Nonprofit Management offers an online MBA or graduate certificate. www.ltu.edu/management! nonprofit.asp Challenging Times, New Opportunities 37 �MARKETPLACE EXHIBITORS (CONTINUED) Pathvvay Partners Tides (Booth# 411) Pathway Partners insulates portfolios from market fluctuations and provides peace of mind. We provide straightforward financial advice to allow your business to succeed and your individual portfolio to reach your goals. Leverage our expertise in designing an asset allocation model that can withstand the rigors of today's everchanging market conditions. www.pathwaypartners.com (Booth# 306) Tides has been working for over 30 years to make the world a better place. We partner with philanthropists, foundations, activists, and organizations across the country and globe to promote economic justice, robust democratic processes, and provide a healthy and sustainable environment where human rights are preserved and protected.With offices in San Francisco and New York City, we have collaborated with over 15,000 individuals and organizations that have touched millions of lives across the country and around the globe. www.tides.org. Plante & Moran, PLLC (Booth # 407) Plante & Moran is the nation's 12th largest certified public accounting and business advisory firm, providing clients with tax, audit, risk management, financial, technology, business consulting, and wealth management services. The firm has a staff of more than I ,600 professionals in 21 offices throughout Michigan, Ohio, and Illinois. www.plantemoran.com Raffa, P.C. (Booth # 402) From tax, audit, accounting and HR administration, to IT services, benefits, and wealth management, Raffa experts provide the support and back office solutions nonprofits need to succeed. Through our recent merger and expansion of services, RAFFA now also provides sophisticated tax and estate planning support to businesses and their owners and believes in leading the private sector by example. www.raffa.com Voices for National Service (Booth # 303) Voices for National Service is a coalition of national service programs, state commissions, and individual champions committed to expanding opportunities for Americans to serve by educating the public and our nation's leaders about the power and impact of service. Founded in 2003 , the coalition is the leading "voice" for national service on Capitol Hill and plays a critical role in disseminating information, legislative updates, and mobilization oppo rtun ities to the field through enewsletters and voicesforservice.org. Voices for National Service organizes the annual Friends of National Service Awards Reception and the National Service Capitol Hill Day. www.cityyear.org Student Conservation Association (Booth # 409) The Student Conservation Association (SCA) is America's conservation corps. Our members protect and restore national parks, marine sanctuaries, cultural landmarks and community green spaces in all 50 states. SCA provides college and high school-aged members . with hands-on conservation service opportunities in virtually every field imaginable, from tracking grizzlies through the Tetons to restoring desert ecosystems and teaching environmental education at Washington, D.C.'s Urban Tree House. We are truly building the next generation of conservation leaders. cumen WEALTH & INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT Sponsor of the Conference Bookstore SCA Detroit's largest program is the Conservation Leadership Corps, a six week summer green job program. I I0 teens spend the summer working on dynamic conservation projects and building the skills that will help them become employable, educated, advocates for themselves, their city, and their environment. www.thesca.org 38 Challenging Times, New Opportunities �2009 Independent Sector Conference Attendees Welcome to Detroit Engage. Learn. Enjoy our great city. communityfoundation FOR SOUTHEAST M ICHIGAN 333 West Fort Street, Suite 2010 Detroit, Michigan 48226-3134 313.961.6675 I www.cfsem.org Follow us on Twitter @cfsem and join our Fan Page on Facebook. �2009 ANNUAL CONFERENCE HOST COMMITTEE Debbie Dingell Oran Hesterman Sandra Rupp Co-chair President and CEO Fair Food Network President United Way ofWashtenaw County Mariam Noland ~~,I\ Co-chair Neelav Hajra Miguel Satut President Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan President and CEO NEW (Nonprofit Enterprise at Work) Program Director W.K. Kellogg Foundation Kathryn Ann Agard Hassan Jaber Executive Director Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Leadership Executive Director Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services Senior Vice President for Programs and Communications Charles Stewart Matt Foundation Michael Brennan CEO Emeritus and Co-Founder Focus: HOPE President and CEO United Way for Southeastern Michigan Eleanor Josaitis Ron Kagan Maureen Smyth Sterling Speirn President and CEO W.K. Kellogg Foundation Shirley Stancato President and CEO New Detroit, Inc. Kyle Caldwell Executive Director and CEO Detroit Zoological Society President and CEO Michigan NonprofitAssociation Katie Burnham Laverty David Campbell President Society for Nonprofit Organizations Executive Director and CEO Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation President McGregor Fund Lt. Colonel Norman Marshall Margaret Tal burtt Carolyn Cassin Divisional Commander The Salvation Army Executive Director James A. and Faith Knight Foundation President and CEO Michigan Women's Foundation Patricia Mooradian Reid Thebault Robert Collier President The Henry Ford President and CEO YMCA of Metropolitan Detroit President Council of Michigan Foundations Faye Alexander Nelson Urvashi Vaid David Egner President and CEO Detroit Riverfront Conservancy Executive Director Arcus Foundation President Hudson-Webber Foundation Anne Parsons Ray Waters President and Executive Director Detroit Symphony Orchestra President ShoreBank Enterprise Detroit Brenda Price William White Carol Goss Program Director John S. and James L. Knight Foundation President and CEO Charles Stewart Matt Foundation President and CEO Skillman Foundation Rip Rapson Geneva Williams President and CEO The Kresge Foundation President and CEO City Connect Detroit Susan Katz Froning Special Assistant to the President and CEO W.K. Kellogg Foundation 40 C hallenging T imes, New Opportunities Ira Strumwasser �During challenging times, innovators collaborate in an effort to maximize their effectiv~ness.ln 2009, Independent Sector and the Council of Michigan Foundations have come together to provide an unparalleled meeting ground for drawing on the true genius that exists w ithin the non profit community. ' CMF INDEPENDENT SECTOR Council of M ichiga n Foundations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. A vital voice for us all Independent Sector is a nonprofit, nonpartisan coalition of charities, foundations, and corporate philanthropy programs, co llectively representing tens of thousands of charitable groups in every st ate across the nation. CM F is a membership associat ion of more than 350 foundations and corporate giving programs whose mission is to strengthen, promote, and increase philanthropy in Michigan. MARKYOUR CALENDARS NOW Independent Sector Annual Conference Council of Michigan Foundations Annual Conference O ctober 20-22, 20 I 0 O ct ober I0- 12, 20 I 0 Atlanta, Georgia Traverse C ity, Mich igan Challenging T im es, N ew Opport unities 41 �INDEPENDENT SECTOR BOARD OF DIRECTORS Brian Gallagher Stephanie Bell-Rose yvendy Puriefoy Chair President The Goldman Sachs Foundation President Public Education Network President and CEO United Way Worldwide Susan Berresford Edward Skloot Ralph Everett Director Center for Strategic Philanthropy and Civil Society Duke University J.D. Hokoyama Vice Chair II\ I President and CEO Leadership Education for Asian Pacifies Lorie Slutsky Gary Yates Treasurer President and CEO The California Wellness Foundation Luz Vega-Marquis Secretary President and CEO Marguerite Casey Foundation Diana Aviv President and CEO I (ex-officio) i President and CEO Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies Barry Gaberman Chair BoardSource Rev. Larry Snyder Stephen Heintz President Rockefeller Brothers Fund At-Large Member Executive Committee President Public Agenda Ellen Alberding President The Joyce Foundation Marguerite Kondracke President and CEO America's Promise Alliance President and CEO Hawai'i Community Foundation Arturo Vargas President and CEO National Council of La Raza Mariam Noland President Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan Andrew Plepler Global Corporate Social Responsibility and Consumer Policy Executive Bank of America 42 President Catholic Charities USA Kelvin Taketa Janet Murguia Ruth Wooden President The New York Community Trust ChallengingTimes, New Opportunities Executive Director National Association of Latino Elected and Appointed Officials Educational Fund Judy Vredenburgh Former President and CEO Big Brothers Big Sisters of America William White President and CEO Charles Stewart Mott Foundation �COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS BOARD OF TRUSTEES Melonie Colaianne Andrea Cole David Page Chairperson Executive Director and CEO Ethel and James Flinn Foundation _Trustee The Jewish Fund President MASCO Corporation Foundation Robert Collier President and CEO Council of Michigan Foundations Caroline Chambers Vice Chair, Corporate Philanthropy Thomas Cook Carol Paine-McGovern Executive Director Cook Family Foundation President Paine Family Foundation David Egner Thomas Porter President and CEO Hudson-Webber Foundation President Porter Family Foundation President Comerica Charitable Foundation Rev. Louis Felton David Sebastian Elizabeth Cherin Trustee Kalamazoo Community Foundation Executive Director Sebastian Foundation Vice Chair, Community Foundations President and CEO Fremont Area Community Foundation Russell Gabier Sterling Speirn Secretary and Trustee Irving S. Gilmore Foundation President and CEO W.K. Kellogg Foundation Betsy Upton Stover Allan Gilmour Margaret Thompson Vice Chair, Family Philanthropy President The Gilmour-Jirgens Fund Trustee Harry A. and Margaret D. Towsley Foundation Trustee Frederick S. Upton Foundation Carol Goss John Colina Secretary President and CEO Skillman Foundation Amanda Van Dusen Senior Principal Miller, Canfield, Paddock, and Stone, PLC President Colina Foundation Brenda Hunt Phillip Peters President and CEO Battle Creek Community Foundation Christian Velasquez Wesley Maurer,Jr. Trustee Dow Corning Foundation Treasurer Vice President of Administration Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Hugo Braun, Jr. Trustee Mackinac Island Community Foundation President Harvey Randall Wickes Foundation Russell Mawby Susan Broman Chairman Emeritus W.K. Kellogg Foundation President Steelcase Foundation Rachel Mraz Daniel Wyant President and COO Edward Lowe Foundation Trustee Eileen and Brian DeVries Family Foundation Challenging Times, New Opportunities 43 �2009 IS ANNUAL CONFERENCE PROGRAM COMMITTEE nan·el Olias Silverman or1perts d Skloot Chair Director of the Center for Strategic Philanthropy and Civil Society Duke University President Civic Ventures L.. Director of Communications - The James Irvine Foundation or e Director of Public Policy Big Brothers Big Sisters of America Executive Director Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Leadership Grand Valley State University e Executive Direct or Arab Community Center for Economic and Social Services y· Vice President of Resource and Business Development Leadership Education for Asian Pacifies Vice President of Programs Skillman Foundation dhry President and CEO Silicon Valley Education Foundation President and CEO Council of Michigan Foundations er President Hudson-Webber Foundation President and CEO Nonprofit Enterprise At Work S san V at1 Froning Special Assistant to ,the President and CEO WK. Kellogg Foundation Vice President National Child Labor Committee "1ay Executive Vice President and COO National Wildlife Federation ,.. oy President Everyday Democracy ric Schwarz President and CEO Vice President, Strategic Initiatives hn S. and James L. Knight Foundation 44 Citizen Schools Cha llenging Ti m es, New O pportu nities Suza ne S1skel Director of Social Justice Philanthropy Ford Foundation aureen Smyth Senior Vice President for Programs and Communications Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Conme Steward Vice President and Chief Learning Officer Habitat for Humanity International Iizabeth Sullivan Vice President of Community Investment Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan en a .A/ Iiams President and CEO City Connect Detroit c rd M. Wizansky Senior Director for Institutional Advancement Student Conservation Association �2009 CMF ANNUAL CONFERENCE PROGRAM COMMITTEE Brenda Price Kimberly Houston-Philpot Bradley Patterson Co-Chair President D ow Corning Foundation Vice President of Program Capital Region Community Foundation Program Director John S. and James L. Knight Foundation Jodee Fishman Raines Sylvester Jones, Jr. Program Officer Ruth Mott Foundation Co-Chair Vice President of Programs Erb Family Foundation Director Community Relations Quicken Loans Katy Locker Program Director Hudson-Webber Foundation Andrea Cole Executive Director and CEO Ethel and James Flinn Foundation Kate Levin Markel Program Officer McG regor Fund Crystal Coleman Human Resources Director The Kresge Foundation Karla Hall Vice President DT E Energy Foundation Jonathan Hohn Vice President Citizens Banking Corporation Charitable Foundation Program Officer Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Wendy Kemp TonyaAIIen Vice President of Program Skillman Foundation Kimberly Roberson Stephen Nedwicki Relationship Manager for Foundations Comerica Bank Pauline Pasch YAC Advisor and Program O fficer Capital Region Community Foundation Challenging Times, New Opportunities Scott Schropp Vice President Investments lies Family Conservation Scholarship Fund Bette Sebastian Spouse Sebastian Foundation Douglas Bitonti Stewart Executive D irector Max M. & Marjorie S. Fisher Foundation Karen Wilson President Karen Colina Wilson Foundation Daniel Wyant President and COO Edward Lowe Foundation 45 �WELCOME TO DETROIT Detroit is one of the U.S. communities where Knight Foundation helps create transformational change. r ~ ~r John S. ·and James L. Knight Foundation www. kn ig htfou ndati on .a rg The John 5. and James L. Knight Foundation advances journalism in the digital age and invests in the vitality of communities where the Kn ight brothers owned newspapers. Knight Founda t ion focuses on projects that promote commun ity engagement and lead to transformational change. For more, visit www.knightfoundation.org . �We are proud to partner with nonprofit organizations to create access and opportunity in underserved communities, improve the health of low-income people, support artistic expression, assist in the revitalization of Detroit, and advance methods for coping with global climate change. THE KRESGE FOUNDATION 3215 West Big Beaver Road I Troy, Michigan 48084 I 248.643.9630 I www.kresge.org �volunteer 5 minutes volunteer 5 volunteer hours \~ - --. -- - �Aetna is proud to support Independent Sector for its work in advancing the nonprofit community. We want you to know ® fAetnff ©2009 Aetna Inc. l]BCBSM +.' ~~~;h~~r~~ FOUNDATION Blue c ross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundati<m ~~~ic:~~,:~,.;:t~u:~~~r::~~~:~~~-nsee A nonprofit corporation and independent licensee of the Blue Cross and Blue Shield Association Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan and the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Foundation are proud to support collaboration, philanthropy and the nonprofit sector. �THERE ARE HUNDREDS OF WAYS WE HELP NOT·FOR-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS. HERE ARE EIGHT OF THEM. \ • Audits & tax consulting • Personnel assessment • Financial services • Real estate advisory services • Operations assessment and management • Human capital & development We do all that and more. Sue Perlin 248.223.3411 plantemoran.com CPAs I Business Advisors THRIVE. �Community Commitment ... it speaks volumes. At DTE Energy, being part of a community is more than simply doing business there. It's about doing our part to help the community and our customers thrive. We wrote the book on community commitment. That's why we believe employee volunteerism, contributions and sponsorships, community involvement and environmental stewardship are so important. At DTE Energy, enhancing the communities we serve is not just a chapter in our bookit's a never-ending story. , The Power of Your Community DTE Energy® e=DTE® �Find Out How to Increase Donations, Volunteers & l-oyalty Online You may struggle with how to quantify the impact of your website and email outreach on your nonprofit organization. ForeSee Results can help you by measuring customer satisfaction with your online experience and how it affects site visitor behaviors that are critical to your success. ~ Did you know that a highly satisfied visitor to a nonprofit's website is:* • 49% more likely to donate to the nonprofit & 38% more likely to volunteer • 57% more likely to have a favorable impression of the organization • 49% more likely to recommend th~~ nonprofit to others ~ How Do You Increase Satisfaction? ForeSee Results can help you understand the needs and expectations of different online constituents and where making improvements can increase donations, membership, and loyalty. We identify high priority areas for improvement that will yield the greatest return on satisfaction and investment, while fostering word-of-mouth recommendations and return visits to the site. \~ Our clients include the American Cancer Society, U.S. Holocaust Memorial Museum, Child Fund International, National Public Radio, American Association of Retired People, and the Smithsonian. Our methodology is based on the University of Michigan's American Customer Satisfaction Index (ACSI)- the only cross-industry methodology proven to link satisfaction with financial results. ~ Visit Our Booth at the Independent Sector Annual Conference For more information call (Boo) 621.2850 or visit us online at www.ForeSeeResults.com. IIi ~ Powered by the FORESEE . American Customer Soti,,ooCoo 'od•x" *From ForeSee Results' original research "Trends in Constituent Satisfaction with Nonprofit Websites: Building Membership, Donations, and Loyalty through the Web Channel" available at www.ForeSeeResults.com www.ForeSeeResults.com R E S U l TS �IF YOU SAVE ONE THING FROM THIS CONFERENCE PROGRAM, IT SHOULD BE THIS PAGE. ------- ----- ---- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I '\ I Smarter grantmaking I I I I isn't just nice, it's a necessity. Join hundreds of grantmakers at GEO's 2010 National Conference as we explore how philanthropy can best support a vibrant nonprofit sector. I I I I I I I I I April 12-14, 2010 I Pittsburgh To learn more and to register, visit www.geofunders.org. I I \ I ... __ _ ' ____________ .,. in partnership with Grantmakers of Western Pennsylvania I ��The Annie E. Casey Foundation Helping Vulnerable Kids and Families Succeed www. aecf.org �Building a truly sustainable business. We believe being a profitable business and a good steward of the environment go hand in hand. Since 2005, we have been working throughout our operations and supply chain to innovate toward three goals: • To use 100% renewable energy • To create zero waste • To sell products that sustain our resources and the environment To find out more, go to walmartstores.com/sustainability. Walmart The "Spark" Design(~~~}. Wa!mart and Save Money. Live Bettec are marks and/or registered marks ofWai~Mart Stores, Inc. ©2009 Wai-Mart Stores, Inc., Bentonville, AR . �ALEADER IN FUND-RAISING CONSULTING AND MANAGEMENT Fund Raising· Development Services · Strategic Consulting To learn more about CCS contact us at 800.223.6733, or visit us at www.ccsfundraising.com Established in 1947, CCS provides fund-raising consulting and management services to extraordinary non-profit organizations nationwide. ' Helping Extraordinary People Champion Insp irational Causes IS er Max M. & Marjorie S. Fisher Foundation is pleased to sponsor the 2009 Independent Sector & Council of Michigan Foundations Annual Conference www.mmfisher.org �~~ ~ .. THE ILES GROUP of MERRILL LYNCH Applauds the COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS And INDEPENDENT SECTOR For helping to make a difference in our community. And that inspires us all. 989-791-8493 or 1-866-260-6235 THEILES GROUP ofMERRILL LYNCH 4805 TOWNE CENTRE ROAD, SUITE 200 SAGINAW, MI 48604 ~ Mel'l'ill Lynch © 2007 Merri ll Lynch, Pierce, Fenne r & Smith Inc. Member, SIPC. �Our Mission Marguerite Casey Foundation exists to help low income families strengthen their voice and mobilize their communities in order to achieve a more just and equitable society for all. Our Vision marguerite casey foundation chang e is possible." \ We imagine a just and equitable society for all, where all children are nurtured to become compassionate, responsible and self-reliant adults; where families are engaged in the life of their communities, the nation, and the world; and where people take responsibility for meeting today's needs as well as those of future generations. Immersed in community spirit. Masco Corporation Foundation salutes the Council of Michigan Foundations for its thoughtful and progressive leadership of Michigan's philanthropic community. ~co �''CHALLENGING TIMES, NEW OPPORTUNITIES'' Congratulations Independent Sector & CMF, on your 2009 Annual Conference CIIAI\l,ES STEWART MOTT FOUNDAJ'!ON www.mott org New Assessment Tool for Family Foundations is one of only 20 firms in the U,S, to complete training necessary to lead a family foundation through the National Center for Philanthropy's Pursuit of Excellence assessment process, Find out how your family foundation measures up in five key areas: NEITHERCUT PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS • • • • • ({lff Neithercut Philanthropy Advisors, Mission and legacy Governance Family roles and dynamics Grantmaking Financial and administrative accountability Creating strategies for effective, rewarding philanthropy LLC • Foundations • Charitable Individuals • Professional Advisors Now in Chicago and Detroit and at neithercutphilanthropy.com Chicago 312-316-9511 I Detroit 313-568-9000 I Contactusforaconsultation. EXPERIENCE • PERSPECTIVE • INTEGRITY �CLEV_liLAND J6undation The Cleveland Foundation salutes Independent Sector and its 29 years ofoutstanding philanthropic leadership. We are also proud to sponsor the Public Policy Action Institute. www.clevelandfoundation.org TheJoyceFomulation Proud Sponsor ofthe Public Policy Action Institute �The- California Wellness Foundation'" salutes the Independent Sector for promoting opportunity and responsibility among nonprofit and philanthropic communities. �LEVEL 4 LEVEL 5 Challenging Times, New Opportunities 65 �Independent Sector For encouraging new ideas and innovative approaches to the challenges and opportunities that confront our world. Best wishes for a successful 2009 conference. ��INDEPENDENT SECTOR A vital voice for us all 1602 L Street, NW, Suite 900 Washington, DC 20036 202-467-6100 202-467-610 I fax www.independentsector.org CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. One South Harbor Avenue, Suite 3 Grand Haven, Ml 49417 616-842-7080 616-842-1760 fax www.michiganfoundations.org The printing of this publication on FSC-certified paper is generously sponsored by BankofAmerica~ Bank of Opportunity· � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2009_AC_Program Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009 annual conference program Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2009 annual conference program. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50752 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2009 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/8ffe307c5af1c74e50aefc60db981d96.pdf 5d8e20d005855cd71b12ab2ca026e810 PDF Text Text MICHIGAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS DATA BOOK ────────────────────────────────── 2008 �MICHIGAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONS DATA BOOK ─────────────────────── 2008 GRAND HAVEN OFFICE One South Harbor Avenue, Suite 3 Grand Haven, MI 49417 Phone: 616.842.7080 Fax: 616.842.1760 www.michiganfoundations.org www.youthgrantmakers.org SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN OFFICE 100 Talon Centre Drive, Suite 150 Detroit, MI 48207 Phone: 313.566.2444 Fax: 313.566.2445 www.forgoodforever.org www.growingcf.org �Section I Michigan Community Foundation Update �MICHIGAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Annual Survey - 2008 Data Summary and Verbatim Responses (N=52) Assets, grants and gifts by Community Foundation (listed by asset size) Community Foundation Assets Grants Made Gifts Received ($) ($) ($) Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan Kalamazoo Community Foundation Grand Rapids Community Foundation Fremont Area Community Foundation Community Foundation of Greater Flint Community Foundation for Muskegon County Battle Creek Community Foundation Capital Region Community Foundation Midland Area Community Foundation Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation Saginaw Community Foundation Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation Community Foundation of St. Clair County Bay Area Community Foundation Community Foundation for Northeast Michigan Jackson Community Foundation Charlevoix County Community Foundation Berrien Community Foundation Community Foundation of the Upper Peninsula Sturgis Area Community Foundation $ 609,969,961 $ 46,515,184 $ 146,978,091 $ 287,717,771 $ 16,219,055 $ 17,059,485 $ 233,515,221 $ 8,181,742 $ 21,950,399 $ 223,902,475 $ 10,571,158 $ 2,564,269 $ 119,846,027 $ 4,824,663 $ 4,098,886 $ 119,839,724 $ 3,331,065 $ 10,650,661 $ 105,705,910 $ 3,276,828 $ 9,371,521 $ 65,446,243 $ 2,452,828 $ 4,863,685 $ 65,187,246 $ 1,561,750 $ 2,156,413 $ 52,855,762 $ 3,747,839 $ 4,035,514 $ 45,580,786 $ 1,159,692 $ 2,835,947 $ 42,076,379 $ 1,242,577 $ 3,425,371 $ 36,007,250 $ 2,474,367 $ 8,305,110 $ 34,277,380 $ 2,145,070 $ 7,405,799 $ 33,117,151 $ 1,339,680 $ 1,139,558 $ 27,906,922 $ 955,067 $ 1,900,674 $ 26,862,848 $ 1,416,478 $ 589,124 $ 23,793,270 $ 1,036,971 $ 2,219,389 $ 23,735,460 $ 1,086,734 $ 2,051,824 $ 22,522,849 $ 1,511,926 $ 2,285,754 $ 19,885,010 $ 1,617,762 $ 2,058,117 $ 18,561,453 $ 395,381 $ 4,051,323 Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �MICHIGAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Annual Survey - 2008 Data Summary and Verbatim Responses (N=52) Assets, grants and gifts by Community Foundation (listed by asset size) Community Foundation Assets Grants Made Gifts Received ($) ($) ($) Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation Hillsdale County Community Foundation Greenville Area Community Foundation Lenawee Community Foundation Barry Community Foundation Allegan County Community Foundation Marshall Community Foundation Four County Community Foundation Marquette Community Foundation Lapeer County Community Foundation Mt. Pleasant Area Community Foundation Cadillac Area Community Foundation Michigan Gateway Community Foundation Roscommon County Community Foundation Tuscola County Community Foundation Gratiot County Community Foundation Dickinson Area Community Foundation Albion Community Foundation Mackinac Island Community Foundation M & M Community Foundations Branch County Community Foundation Community Foundation of Monroe County $ 18,065,535 $ 640,537 $ 1,733,168 $ 17,232,977 $ 454,480 $ 1,813,700 $ 15,653,224 $ 722,668 $ 2,021,939 $ 14,666,670 $ 628,403 $ 5,715,578 $ 13,029,195 $ 3,349,629 $ 2,568,553 $ 12,824,114 $ 283,362 $ 82,997 $ 10,948,139 $ 423,821 $ 424,397 $ 10,613,041 $ 458,431 $ 124,525 $ 9,836,494 $ 164,490 $ 104,415 $ 8,173,321 $ 201,933 $ 312,527 $ 7,562,877 $ 277,274 $ 1,195,660 $ 6,555,272 $ 138,221 $ 145,523 $ 6,165,612 $ 205,332 $ 172,702 $ 6,160,685 $ 240,018 $ 125,355 $ 6,144,097 $ 311,878 $ 221,954 $ 5,819,996 $ 134,329 $ 281,367 $ 5,785,874 $ 152,324 $ 244,878 $ 5,501,356 $ 228,879 $ 202,024 $ 5,393,671 $ 123,322 $ 562,362 $ 5,242,650 $ 309,911 $ 635,227 $ 5,212,049 $ 348,606 $ 244,591 $ 5,109,657 $ 359,416 $ 1,124,065 Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �MICHIGAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Annual Survey - 2008 Data Summary and Verbatim Responses (N=52) Assets, grants and gifts by Community Foundation (listed by asset size) Community Foundation Assets Grants Made Gifts Received ($) ($) ($) Keweenaw Community Foundation Sanilac County Community Foundation Shiawassee Community Foundation Southfield Community Foundation Leelanau Township Community Foundation Otsego County Community Foundation Manistee County Community Foundation Huron County Community Foundation Baraga County Community Foundation Greater Frankenmuth Area Community Foundation Community Foundation of Greater Rochester Three Rivers Area Community Foundation SUMMARY AVERAGE $ 4,211,594 $ 72,902 $ 445,521 $ 3,686,324 $ 114,481 $ 283,901 $ 3,530,317 $ 147,944 $ 94,044 $ 2,767,881 $ 73,577 $ 489,063 $ 2,659,954 $ 291,956 $ 204,560 $ 2,380,522 $ 90,227 $ 69,230 $ 1,955,546 $ 327,651 $ 642,186 $ 1,688,306 $ 32,731 $ 239,951 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ 0 $ $ 128,372,551 2,468,703 $ $ 284,522,877 5,471,594 $ 2,462,890,048 $ 47,363,270 Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �MICHIGAN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION Annual Survey - 2008 Data Summary and Verbatim Responses (N=52) ASSETS: $2,463,752,576 Over $100M 7 50+ – 100M 3 20+ – 50M 10 10+ – 20M 10 5+ – 10M 14 1 – 5M 8 GRANTS: $128,432,303 Over $5M 4 1 – 5M 17 500K+ – 1M 4 100K+ – 500K 23 Under 100K 4 GIFTS: $283,101,650 Over $10M 4 1 – 10M 23 500K+ – 1M 5 Under 500K 20 Community foundations often have impacts on their communities that may or may not involve specific grants. Please choose one from the following list of leadership roles as the most important leadership role filled by your community foundation last year. Leadership role played by community foundation # % Involvement in community planning for the future. Convenor for community discussions. Serving as a neutral partner, bringing diverse groups together to solve common problems. Leveraging or brokering funds to meet community needs. Providing technical assistance to nonprofits. Catalyst for needed change. 7 11 16 25 4 8 5 5 9 18 11 11 Stimulating public/private partnership. Responding to community emergencies. Developing community leaders. 1 2 2 2 4 4 Total Responses: 45 100 Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �Michigan Community Foundations August 2008 Annual Survey Asset Category Over $100 M $50+ to $100 M $20+ to $50 M $10+ to $20 M $5+ to $10 M Up to $5 M Total Functional Expenses Per IRS Form 990 * Number of Program Management Foundations Grants Less Grants & General Fundraising Total 7 3 10 10 14 5 77.9% 68.9% 71.3% 76.5% 57.1% 54.0% 10.0% 18.0% 10.0% 7.0% 15.7% 4.6% 7.9% 9.8% 14.1% 12.6% 23.8% 34.8% 4.2% 3.3% 4.6% 3.9% 3.3% 6.6% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 49 75.6% 10.4% 9.8% 4.2% 100.0% * Figures are from the latest IRS Form 990 which in most cases will be the 2007 return. Gift Type Break Down ** Cash Securities Other Total 78.5% 19.8% 1.7% 100.0% ** Based on 51 foundation responses S:\Communications\Surveys\CF Survey\2008\Raw Data\cf survey 2008 990 & Gift & Grant Data �Michigan Community Foundations August 2008 Annual Survey Investment Rates of Return As of 12-31-07 Foundation 1 Foundation 2 Foundation 3 Foundation 4 Foundation 5 Foundation 6 Foundation 7 Foundation 8 Foundation 9 Foundation 10 Foundation 11 Foundation 12 Foundation 13 Foundation 14 Foundation 15 Foundation 16 Foundation 17 Foundation 18 Foundation 19 Foundation 20 Foundation 21 Foundation 22 Foundation 23 Foundation 24 Foundation 25 Foundation 26 Foundation 27 Foundation 28 Foundation 29 Foundation 30 Foundation 31 Foundation 32 Foundation 33 Foundation 34 Foundation 35 Foundation 36 Foundation 37 Foundation 38 Foundation 39 Foundation 40 Foundation 41 Foundation 42 Foundation 43 Annualized Rate of Return 1 Year 3 Years 5 Years 10 Years 8.5% 10.7% 13.9% 2.1% 7.2% 11.1% 7.7% 9.1% 11.9% 6.0% 6.7% 10.2% 14.5% 7.5% 10.2% 10.4% 13.6% 7.1% 9.2% 12.7% 6.4% 7.8% 9.2% 12.1% 6.5% 5.8% 8.7% 7.0% 9.5% 12.8% 6.9% 9.1% 10.1% 13.8% 7.8% 8.4% 11.9% 10.0% 7.0% 8.5% 11.9% 9.2% 8.8% 9.5% 12.5% 9.3% 6.0% 8.5% 8.9% 8.7% 10.7% 14.0% 7.2% 8.4% 9.8% 12.8% 6.7% 9.4% 12.3% 8.1% 10.5% 13.8% 8.0% 10.1% 13.1% 8.2% 8.8% 9.0% 9.5% 10.5% 12.5% 8.2% 6.0% -1.0% 7.4% 4.9% 0.0% 12.0% 6.9% 9.2% 12.6% 8.9% 8.7% 10.3% 13.4% 8.7% 8.3% 10.0% 12.9% 7.1% 9.9% 12.3% 0.0% 8.4% 4.2% 7.1% 6.8% -2.2% -3.5% 5.7% 7.4% 6.8% 7.7% 11.0% 9.1% 7.0% 8.3% 9.8% 16.2% 15.2% 10.9% 11.1% 12.0% 9.9% 8.5% 8.3% 6.9% 8.7% 7.2% 7.9% 5.6% 8.1% 8.4% 9.7% 9.7% 6.5% 8.2% 10.2% 7.4% 5.8% 9.6% 10.3% 13.3% S:\Communications\Surveys\CF Survey\2008\Raw Data\cf survey 2008 990 & Gift & Grant Data �Michigan Community Foundations August 2008 Annual Survey Grants -- Field of Interest Breakdown Code B P A E O S N C W T L X Z J K D G F I V M U H R Q Description Education/Instruction Human Service-Multipurpose/Other Arts, Culture, Humanities Health, General and Rehabilitative Youth Development Community Improvement/Capacity Building Recreation, Leisure & Sports, Athletics Environmental Quality, Protection and Beautification Public Affairs/Society Benefit Philanthropy, Voluntarism & Grant Making Foundations Housing, Shelter Religious Related/Spiritual Development Do Not Report (Supporting Organizations, etc) Employment Jobs Food Nutrition, Agriculture Animal Related Activities Disease/Disorder/Medical Disciplines Mental Health/Crisis Intervention Public Protection, Crime, Justice, Legal Services Social Sciences Public Safety/Disaster Preparedness & Relief Science & Technology Medical Research Civil Rights, Social Action, Advocacy International/Foreign Affairs & National Security Amount $ 27,161,579 13,934,310 9,927,276 5,038,239 4,627,243 3,913,425 3,427,992 3,088,393 2,372,569 1,921,374 1,838,946 1,704,547 1,559,848 1,029,225 674,788 576,132 495,032 475,203 440,420 351,004 328,052 202,750 175,780 139,183 20,288 % 31.8% 16.3% 11.6% 5.9% 5.4% 4.6% 4.0% 3.6% 2.8% 2.2% 2.2% 2.0% 1.8% 1.2% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% $ 85,423,598 100.0% Based on 42 foundation responses As of the foundation's latest fiscal year end. S:\Communications\Surveys\CF Survey\2008\Raw Data\cf survey 2008 990 & Gift & Grant Data �Michigan Community Foundations August 2008 Annual Survey Grants -- Request Type Breakdown Code Description 40 Program Development 10 General/Operating 25 Endowment Funds 21 Building/Renovation 20 Capital Campaign 53 Scholarship Funds 91 Scholarships to Individuals 15 Annual Campaigns 24 Land Acquisition 22 Equipment 0 Not Specified: Not Specified 50 Student Aid 30 Emergency Funds 46 Seed Money 47 Curriculum Development 70 Technical Assistance 27 Collections Acquisition 87 Foundation Programs 41 Conferences/Seminars 80 Program Related Investment 23 Computer Systems 49 Exhibitions 42 Faculty/Staff Development 26 Debt Reduction 48 Performance/Production. 60 Research 45 Publication 85 Employee Matching 44 Film/Video/Radio 43 Professorships 90 Grants to Individual 51 Fellowship Funds 52 Internship Funds 83 Trustee Discretion 86 Employee Scholarship 92 Fellowships to Individuals Amount $ 39,925,182 25,028,090 13,244,828 10,080,538 7,534,968 4,607,405 3,612,629 2,867,653 2,722,850 2,324,377 2,109,351 1,628,567 938,519 847,164 700,821 597,704 501,544 437,024 349,240 301,253 301,084 289,916 286,550 216,681 215,361 181,584 100,521 64,532 54,387 43,911 24,445 10,996 7,500 4,725 0 0 % 32.7% 20.5% 10.8% 8.3% 6.2% 3.8% 3.0% 2.3% 2.2% 1.9% 1.7% 1.3% 0.8% 0.7% 0.6% 0.5% 0.4% 0.4% 0.3% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% $ 122,161,900 100.0% Based on 39 foundation responses As of the foundation's latest fiscal year end. S:\Communications\Surveys\CF Survey\2008\Raw Data\cf survey 2008 990 & Gift & Grant Data �Michigan Community Foundations – Examples of the most important leadership role designated by each community foundation Albion Community Foundation Convenor for community discussions - Our foundation was without an executive director for the majority of the year, but did host a Nonprofit Forum in Nov. 2007 to discuss the capacity issues of nonprofits in the community, as well as what type of support the nonprofits needed most from the Foundation, in addition to funding. Allegan County Community Leveraging or brokering funds to meet community needs. Foundation Pairing donor advised funds with community needs Ann Arbor Area Community Convenor for community discussions - Convened partners to Foundation transition program from nonprofit going out of business. Barry Community Foundation Convenor for community discussions - Provided funding for a community capacity survey that was distributed through the free local paper to every household, via placemats at restaurants, internet and intranet, email etc. Battle Creek Community Foundation Bay Area Community Foundation Leveraging or brokering funds to meet community needs Assisted the Calhoun County Conservation District in acquiring 326 acres of relatively untouched green space in Southwest Michigan. The acquisition of the Harts Lake property by the Calhoun Conservation District dedicated it to public land and provides public access preserving the property/environment and the unique habitats that exist there. The opportunity for research and study with the collective expertise of various environmental professionals of the area has created a vibrant collaboration to assist in the management of the land. Involvement in community planning for the future - Bay Area Community Foundation & United Way of Bay County Non-Profit Leadership Training Phase II: Organizational Assessment Overview & Process Berrien Community Foundation Cadillac Area Community Foundation Leveraging or brokering funds to meet community need Leveraging or brokering funds to meet community need Our $20,000 Grant to the OASIS Family Resource Center renovation of the Women's Shelter allowed the grantee to apply for a $100,000 grant from the state, which they received and which allowed the needed renovation. Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �Michigan Community Foundations – Examples of the most important leadership role designated by each community foundation Capital Region Community Foundation Charlevoix County Community Foundation Community Foundation for Muskegon County Community Foundation for Northeast Michigan Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan Leveraging or brokering funds to meet community need - In 2007, based on a recent community needs analysis and strategic plan, the Capital Region Community Foundation (CRCF) targeted economic development and youth development as its top priorities. This resulted in CRCF joining the board during the formative stages of the Lansing Area Economic Development Partnership (LEAP), and creating a Capital Region Community Youth Initiative. The CRCF and the Capital Area United Way (CAUW) convened a series of community dialogues with experts in the area of youth programming investment and approximately 20 funders to determine the most effective way to invest in our region's youth. Providing technical assistance to non-profits - Many nonprofit organizations and citizen groups in smaller communities are hampered by a lack of staffing, technical capability, or both to administer and manage a sizeable capital campaign. During 2007, our community foundation served in that role for four capital campaigns that all met their goals and raised almost $2.5 million. Convenor for community discussions - The Community Foundation has hosted a number of discussions with other nonprofits in an effort to create a Culture of Learning in Muskegon County. This culture would be reflected in higher graduation rates, lower high school drop out rates, increased mentorship and increased access to higher education. Convenor for community discussions - The Community Foundation for Northeast Michigan has called meetings of the area funders to talk about what we can do together to help our area nonprofits. Convenor for community discussions - In late 2006 and into 2007, the Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan hosted a sixsession learning series, “Healthy Children, Healthy Communities” addressing the childhood obesity epidemic in conjunction with the University of Michigan School of Public Health. The six sessions were captured on video and edited, along with the related training materials, by the Michigan Public Health Training Center. The entire series will soon be available to the public as an on-line Web course. Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �Michigan Community Foundations – Examples of the most important leadership role designated by each community foundation Community Foundation of Greater Flint Community Foundation of Monroe County Community Foundation of St. Clair County Catalyst for needed change - CFGF entered a partnership with local developers to purchase 2 abandoned buildings on Flint's main street and renovated them to include relocation of our offices, 2 loft apartments, and a future commercial enterprise. The renovation has sparked the community's imagination and is helping the community understand that downtown's revitalization is possible. Convenor for community discussions - Convened groups such as Community Impact Roundtable Discussions, Monroe Area Grantmakers Roundtable discussions & Land Use Committee, War of 1812 Bicentennial. Catalyst for needed change - St. Clair County is tied to the auto industry and is experiencing a very challenging economy. The Foundation is focusing staff resources in addition to funding to help local communities. Current Priorities: Community Development Education Arts & Culture Community Foundation of the Involvement in community planning for the future - In 2007 Holland/Zeeland Area The Community Foundation of H/Z made the largest discretionary grant in our history. A $100,000 strategic investment went to Lakeshore Advantage, who facilitated a tremendous partnership between Pfizer and Michigan State University. This project is one of economic development importance: The MSU Bioeconomy Institute. This project transforms Pfizer's world class laboratory into a state of the art facility for biological research. Community Foundation of the Providing technical assistance to non-profits - The Upper Peninsula foundation's FIMS Hub provides administrative support to nine affiliate foundations and five independent community foundations throughout Michigan and Wisconsin. This service has saved these entities thousands of dollars in operational costs, while receiving the benefit of using FIMS for their financial, donor and grant management. It also allows their limited staff more time to further the work of their foundation and with fund development. Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �Michigan Community Foundations – Examples of the most important leadership role designated by each community foundation Dickinson Area Community Foundation Four County Community Foundation Fremont Area Community Foundation Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Grand Rapids Community Foundation Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation Serving as a neutral partner, bringing diverse groups together to solve common problems - Through our Civic Improvement Fund, strong personalities are brought together to work on community-based projects that benefit three diverse neighboring communities. Over the past several years, the three communities have joined together to work on projects that never would have been addressed had it not been for the involvement of the Foundation and funding we brought to the table. Stimulating public/private partnership - We have produced an events brochure which highlights area festivals & fairs, orchards, farm markets, parks, museums, & nature centers. This assists in "buy local" activities and increases awareness of the activities available in our area for residents and visitors. We have increased networking between the various organizations and events, especially in regard to agriculture. Our area farms have been greatly reduced over the years and replaced with residential and commercial development. Our efforts are assisting area agricultural businesses. Convenor for community discussions - We are working with a local municipality and a large employer to assist in job retention and growth. Additionally we assisted a local school district to bring groups together to develop the 211 network in Newaygo County. Convenor for community discussions Catalyst for needed change - After more than a decade of failed efforts to improve the connection between Health & Human Services and schools due to bureaucratic constraints, the Kent School Services Network represents an unprecedented alliance of the community's major health and human services providers to collaborate in support of the schools. The Grand Rapids Community Foundation played a significant community leadership role in the development of the Network. They convened the key public and private groups, funded research to inform the project, provided significant seed funding and maintained pressure on systems that serve children to work together. Within the first partial year, student attendance has increased markedly. Students and families can access health, mental health, referral and other services on-site. Developing community leaders Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �Michigan Community Foundations – Examples of the most important leadership role designated by each community foundation Gratiot County Community Foundation Greenville Area Community Foundation Hillsdale County Community Foundation Huron County Community Foundation Jackson Community Foundation Kalamazoo Community Foundation Keweenaw Community Foundation Lapeer County Community Foundation Developing community leaders - Tina Travis, Executive Director, is a member of the Leadership Gratiot program training new and emerging leaders in Gratiot County to become actively engaged in improving the quality of life for residents of this community Convenor for community discussions Convenor for community discussions Providing technical assistance to non-profits - We can help non-profits determine their long term financial goals and if endowments fit into those goals. Serving as a neutral partner, bringing diverse groups together to solve common problems - These leaders in Jackson studied models and consulted national experts to propose a different future for Jackson County’s youth, resulting in the formation of the Jackson Legacy Program. Annually, the Jackson Legacy Program will provide scholarships for Jackson County high school graduates commencing at one of Jackson County’s institutions of higher learning, including those that offer vocational training or technical certification, with opportunities for continued support for a full four years. The mission is to cultivate productive citizens through effective, relevant education; provide Jackson County high school graduates with opportunities to further their education; and to revitalize Jackson County. Catalyst for needed change Convenor for community discussions Involvement in community planning for the future - The Foundation organized and implemented Envisioning Lapeer County's Future which brought together over 70 community leaders of all ages in the areas of health care, education, government, transportation, and economy. Through a committee process the groups met and developed priorities and summaries of what they would like to see in the future for Lapeer County in each of these fields. After several members attended a Harvard University Community Problem Solving course, we then formed a VIC (Vision Implementation Committee) to carry the vision's message to the rest of the county including government, educational and leadership entities. Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �Michigan Community Foundations – Examples of the most important leadership role designated by each community foundation Leelanau Township Community Foundation Lenawee Community Foundation M & M Community Foundation Mackinac Island Community Foundation Manistee County Community Foundation Marquette Community Foundation Marshall Community Foundation Michigan Gateway Community Foundation Midland Area Community Foundation Convenor for community discussions - Created the Future by Design program whose goal is to create a sustainable coastal community. Providing technical assistance to non-profits - We played a key role in the Human Services Council, sponsoring a Bridges out of Poverty workshop, hosting a Good to Great discussion, & serving in a leadership capacity; we re-developed our county's volunteer center (which had gone out of business), & provided a resource guide for nonprofits to utilize with their clients; we also provided facilitation for strategic planning, and worked one-onone with nonprofit directors to solve issues they were facing. Providing technical assistance to non-profits - We provide one or two seminars designed for non-profits free of charge. We brought in speakers who spoke on: fundraising, board development, growing an endowment, writing effective grants, managing your board, getting your message to the community. Leveraging or brokering funds to meet community need Helping local non-profits benefit from the generosity of our many donors. Assisting them with the grant applications and identifying needs which can be met through our funds. Leveraging or brokering funds to meet community need - In 2006 the MCCF catalyzed enVision Manistee County, the first county-wide, community-driven effort to outline goals, strategies and actions to meet the needs of Manistee County. MCCF sought and received grants from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Oleson Foundation, State of Michigan and others to help implement enVision. MCCF also provided assistance to other local organizations in seeking and leveraging resources to further enVision goals and strategies. Involvement in community planning for the future Convenor for community discussions Convenor for community discussions - We brought various members of separate communities together to discuss cooperation around marketing the tourist and historic opportunities of our region. Participants included city planners, tourism council leaders, chambers of commerce representatives, and regional tourism staff. Responding to community emergencies - Project from MACF took leadership role in addressing teen dating violence after a violent death took place in a relationship. This occurred on a high school campus. Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �Michigan Community Foundations – Examples of the most important leadership role designated by each community foundation Mt. Pleasant Area Community Foundation Otsego County Community Foundation Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation Roscommon County Community Foundation Saginaw Community Foundation Sanilac County Community Foundation Shiawassee Community Foundation Southfield Community Foundation Involvement in community planning for the future - The community is conducting community planning "Vision 20/20". Foundation representatives serve on all of the Vision 20/20 committees but most notably on the Leadership Committee. We are developing a Leadership Matrix for the community. We also serve on the Community Leadership Institute's Steering Committee. Responding to community emergencies - Emergencies, in this case means financial emergencies for several organizations and effective programs in Otsego County. MSU Extension, Big Brother/Big Sisters and Northern Family Intervention, as examples, all lost traditional funding for programs that really work and benefit our community. Serving as a neutral partner, bringing diverse groups together to solve common problems - We convened a group of diverse organizations and individuals concerned about youth substance abuse in our community. Individuals and organizations that attended the convening formed the SAFE in Northern Michigan (Substance Abuse Free Environment) group which now meets monthly to share information and brainstorm community-wide strategies. A youth group has been formed that has already conducted successful projects to help reduce substance abuse during peak times such as prom and homecoming. The SAFE group also hosted a well attended Town Hall meeting to raise awareness. Our Community Foundation has been providing the majority of the funding to support the SAFE projects. Serving as a neutral partner, bringing diverse groups together to solve common problems - We have a partnership with Weyerhaeuser Company to distribute their "gently used" computers to worthy non-profit organizations. We keep a list of what is needed and do the distribution from our office. It saves Weyerhaeuser the expense of shipping them somewhere else, and it helps many non-profits get the computers they need at no expense to their organization. Catalyst for needed change - Participating on county committees to address these needs. Convenor for community discussions Convenor for community discussions Convenor for community discussions Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �Michigan Community Foundations – Examples of the most important leadership role designated by each community foundation Sturgis Area Community Foundation Tuscola County Community Foundation Convenor for community discussions - Involved in a variety of Economic development issue through cooperation with the EDC and also education based economic development with area leaders Leveraging or brokering funds to meet community need Planned community information seminars are established announcing how the community foundation can help local communities with their variety of needs via the grant management process. These sessions are held every six months. Hundreds of individuals across the county have participated. Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �Michigan Community Foundations – Examples of the single grant distributed through the past fiscal year with the most impact on each community Community Foundation Albion Community Foundation Allegan County Community Foundation Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation Barry Community Foundation Battle Creek Community Foundation Bay Area Community Foundation Cadillac Area Community Foundation Capital Region Community Foundation Charlevoix County Community Foundation Community Foundation for Muskegon County Community Foundation for Northeast Michigan Grant Description Grant Amount: $5,000 - Free clinic services for Albion residents Grant Amount: $10,000 - The community rallied to raise the remaining $3500 needed to buy a Jaws of Life device to extricate victims from wreckage in car crashes. Grant Amount: $30,000 - Childcare training. Grant Amount: $5,513 - This grant will implement 16 new elementary school programs for youth to learn about entrepreneurship through JA. It is one of our goals through the Hometown Partnership Initiative that will impact many residents through youth and their families. Grant Amount: $165,000 - Funds provided sustainability for senior programming as the Battle Creek Community Foundation secured the facility by creating a title holding corporation and secured an additional $900,000 to complete the restructuring of the Senior Center into a sustainable operation. Grant Amount: $10,600 - Purchase native plant species for a selfsustaining rain garden that will be located on the school property. Grant Amount: $20,000 - Shelter Home renovation - new roof, windows, bathrooms, kitchen and utility rooms. Our grant allowed the grantee to apply for a State Housing grant of $100,000 which provided the needed funds to make the renovations to the Women's Shelter. Grant Amount: $625,000 - Three year 0-5 school readiness project. Grant Amount: $5,500 - This grant proposal supports the creation of a new program, the Entrepreneurial Division, within Northern Lakes Economic Alliance, dedicated to helping entrepreneurs create new jobs and retain existing jobs. The grant applies to the first year of a three year implementation plan and focuses on three main components: 1)Establishing a multi-community, networked incubator program with a wide range of business support services; 2)Continuation of the Creating Entrepreneur Communities (CEC) program to nurture and retain entrepreneurs; 3)Expansion of current individual business counseling efforts. Grant dollars would be used to employ a staff person to accomplish the outlined goals of the new division. Grant Amount: $7,000 - To support the start up of Family Resource Centers in area schools. The Family Resource Centers offer coordinated delivery of service at a centralized location (school) for families in need. Grant Amount: $162,000 - We assisted with the cost of purchasing a hyperbaric chamber for the hospital. Not only will be in incredibly important in diving accidents, it will also be used for wound treatments for diabetic patients. Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �Michigan Community Foundations – Examples of the single grant distributed through the past fiscal year with the most impact on each community Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan Community Foundation of Greater Flint Community Foundation of Monroe County Community Foundation of St. Clair County Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Community Foundation of the Upper Peninsula Dickinson Area Community Foundation Four County Community Foundation Fremont Area Community Foundation Grant Amount: $700,000 - The New Economy Initiative for Southeast Michigan is an innovative philanthropic effort that will help restore southeast Michigan to a position of leadership in the new global economy. Ten national, regional and local foundations have committed $100 million to this unprecedented eight-year initiative. The New Economy Initiative is the one of the largest philanthropic initiatives focused on regional economic development in the country. The New Economy Initiative is philanthropy’s response to the declining economy of Metropolitan Detroit. The goal of the initiative is to accelerate the transition of metro Detroit to an innovation-based economy that expands opportunity for all. Grant Amount: $38,787 - Support for school-based community health service clinic. Grant Amount: $2,000 - Purchase of American Red Cross emergency vehicle Grant Amount: $250,000 - In conjunction with the comprehensive incentive package offered to Chrysler to locate a facility in St. Clair County, a $500,000 training grant was included. The Community Foundation of St. Clair County awarded $250,000 toward the training package and the grant was matched by the Citizens First Foundation. The plant will be a highly technological facility and is expected to be operational for the 2009 line of cars. The grant opened the door for St. Clair County Community College to work with Chrysler to determine the best method with which to redevelop and train a local workforce. The facility will bring approximately 900 new jobs to the community. Grant Amount: $100,000 - The MSU Bioeconomy Institute grant was the largest in our history. The grant will help turn Pfizer's world class labratory into Michigan State Unversity's biologocial research institute, where partnerships and collaborations will result in economic growth and leadership in the new green markets. The institute will focus on creating new materials with fuels and chemicals from plants instead of petroleum, yielding significant benefits on many levels, including economic vitality and environmental sustainability. Grant Amount: $108,746 - Distribution from fund, which affected many departments within the city and the community of Gladstone from recreation to maintenance and improvements to public facilities. Grant Amount: $5,800 - Jump surface replacement for water ski club. Grant Amount: $18,000 - Purchase of a 12 lead EKG machine for an advanced life support vehicle. This allows data to be transmitted while patient is being transported. The team is ready at the hospital when the ambulance arrives. Grant Amount: $100,000 - Mobile food pantry trucks delivered through community partners to various locations throughout Newaygo County. Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �Michigan Community Foundations – Examples of the single grant distributed through the past fiscal year with the most impact on each community Grand Rapids Community Foundation Gratiot County Community Foundation Huron County Community Foundation Jackson Community Foundation Kalamazoo Community Foundation Lapeer County Community Foundation Leelanau Township Community Foundation Lenawee Community Foundation M & M Community Foundations Mackinac Island Community Foundation Marquette Community Foundation Michigan Gateway Community Foundation Midland Area Community Foundation Mt. Pleasant Area Community Foundation Otsego County Community Foundation Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation Roscommon County Community Foundation Saginaw Community Foundation Tuscola County Community Foundation Grant Amount: $486,000 - School-based program that coordinates and delivers health and human services to students and families. Grant Amount: $3,000 – Provided support for a community based dental clinic. Grant Amount: $500 - Youth Homeless Awareness Grant Amount: $40,000 - Operational Support to improve the capacity of local nonprofits. Grant Amount: $153,209 - A comprehensive family literacy program Grant Amount: $20,000 - Energy and water conservation Grant Amount: $340,000 - An operational grant to open a early childhood education program. Grant Amount: $10,000 - Training the Trainers to spread youth assets Grant Amount: $7,000 - Provide prescription drugs to individuals with no or little health insurance. Grant Amount: $3,100 - Meals on Snowmobiles Grant Amount: $10,000 - Construct a permanent skate park in Marquette Grant Amount: $4,750 - Brought in a speaker to two local High Schools to talk about Teen Pregnancy Prevention. The message will be incorporated into the overall environment of the daily school activities. Grant Amount: $7,500 - Food backpacks Grant Amount: $6,300 - Provided furnishings for teen center Grant Amount: $2,780 – To MSU for their “Playgroup Program” for 60 new mothers and mothers with toddlers. Grant Amount: $6,625 - SAFE is related to our strategic initiative of tackling youth substance abuse. We made several grants to SAFE last year to support community awareness projects such as a Town Hall event. Grant Amount: $2,500 - Side Scan Sonar training for Dive Team of the Roscommon County Sheriff Dept. This equipment is used to help with Search and Rescue when there are drownings in our lakes. So far the bodies of 2 people have been found. Grant Amount: $10,000 - Provide funds for a multi-purpose barrier free athletic complex with a custom designed synthetic turf athletic field for youth and adults with physical and mental challenges. Grant Amount: $10,000 – To assist in the construction of a home for a needy family in Tuscola County. Community Foundation Annual Survey 2008 Report to the Field �Section II Michigan Community Foundations’ Youth Project Update �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC Assets, Grants and Gifts by Community Foundation Name Lead or Affiliate Assets ($) Grants 07-08 ($) # of Grants Gifts Received ($) Grants Total ($) Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation Lead 2,852,172 82,170 21 8,115 1,300,000 Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan Lead 2,478,209 29,200 5 2,655 654,005 Lead 2,432,516 105,331 15 150 998,933 Lead 2,389,331 123,000 41 0 1,100,000 Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Lead 2,200,000 64,527 24 3,958 800,000 Allegan County Community Foundation Lead 1,974,145 42,933 21 0 540,000 Community Foundation of Greater Flint Lead 1,902,758 30,375 11 0 673,762 Marshall Community Foundation Lead 1,746,345 53,810 17 0 370,000 Grand Rapids Community Foundation Lead 1,723,743 56,750 16 15 791,798 Bay Area Community Foundation Lead 1,676,417 61,465 16 550 1,000,000 Kalamazoo Community Foundation Lead 1,663,362 90,000 21 100 1,200,000 Community Foundation for Muskegon County Lead 1,629,767 51,991 26 265 1,000,000 Battle Creek Community Foundation Lead 1,488,957 24,245 14 1,500 871,663 Midland Area Community Foundation Lead 1,416,334 37,895 12 176 242,502 Hillsdale County Community Foundation Lead 1,351,337 50,339 27 2,052 670,040 Fremont Area Community Foundation Lead 1,335,178 66,305 11 950 492,708 Community Foundation of St. Clair County Lead 1,305,901 61,897 47 1,226 647,861 Cadillac Area Community Foundation Lead 1,300,000 56,700 8 0 340,000 The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC Assets, Grants and Gifts by Community Foundation Name Lead or Affiliate Assets ($) Grants 07-08 ($) # of Grants Gifts Received ($) Grants Total ($) Community Foundation for Northeast Michigan Lead 1,262,741 59,174 60 0 861,635 Capital Region Community Foundation Lead 1,215,548 55,200 52 1,800 550,000 Barry Community Foundation Lead 1,209,840 28,300 13 4,233 265,113 Jackson Community Foundation Lead 1,199,861 66,156 60 5,000 726,000 Berrien Community Foundation Lead 1,194,000 56,000 11 400 1,000,000 Tuscola County Community Foundation Lead 1,141,839 44,897 18 250 162,700 Saginaw Community Foundation Lead 1,114,513 58,426 21 12 822,130 Charlevoix County Community Foundation Lead 1,081,919 52,392 27 1,000 619,000 Greenville Area Community foundation Lead 1,077,149 56,335 16 500 368,904 Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation Lead 1,069,147 62,209 28 3,160 762,956 Lenawee Community Foundation Lead 1,056,187 30,000 13 0 380,000 Sturgis Area Community Foundation Lead 918,618 41,750 18 600 229,484 Four County Community Foundation Lead 866,750 25,762 30 0 340,848 Branch County Community Foundation Lead 823,770 10,744 6 1 372,659 Mt. Pleasant Area Community Foundation Lead 773,021 36,355 26 2,335 286,890 M&M Area Community Foundation Lead 755,300 32,395 16 600 205,000 Shiawassee Community Foundation Lead 695,573 24,942 14 92,097 164,339 Southfield Community Foundation Lead 640,435 44,226 YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field 3,600 �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC Assets, Grants and Gifts by Community Foundation Name Lead or Affiliate Assets ($) Grants 07-08 ($) # of Grants Gifts Received ($) Grants Total ($) Lapeer County Community Foundation Lead 579,737 13,699 4 500 37,058 Michigan Gateway Community Foundation Lead 568,242 10,300 7 1,300 180,000 Community Foundation for Oceana County Affiliate 560,024 28,046 54 200 628,035 Dickinson Area Community Foundation Lead 531,471 20,611 14 0 125,357 Keweenaw Community Foundation Lead 490,568 24,785 16 0 48,556 Marquette Community Foundation Lead 477,207 43,500 17 1,391 148,786 Community Foundation for Delta County Affiliate 477,191 18,881 27 800 282,694 Gratiot County Community Foundation Lead 433,777 1,900 7 1,311 61,868 North Central Michigan Community Foundation Affiliate 383,184 15,845 19 0 137,812 Crystal Falls Area Community Foundation Affiliate 369,269 16,387 9 0 42,509 Community Foundation for Mason County Affiliate 352,780 17,678 20 400 120,000 Albion Community Foundation Lead 341,205 9,468 11 610 88,176 Mackinac Island Community Foundation Lead 339,133 6,840 5 200 37,688 Leelanau Township Community Foundation Lead 325,821 10,837 11 300 94,390 Coopersville Area YAC Affiliate 316,848 9,650 12 950 110,792 Chippewa County Community Foundation Affiliate 311,206 18,100 9 100 58,399 Homer Area Community Foundation Affiliate 305,831 6,738 10 3,004 41,000 Mecosta County Community Foundation Affiliate 295,506 13,385 12 425 145,828 YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC Assets, Grants and Gifts by Community Foundation Name Lead or Affiliate Assets ($) Grants 07-08 ($) # of Grants Gifts Received ($) Grants Total ($) Fenton Community Fund Affiliate 283,862 8,950 5 2 117,328 Iosco County Community Foundation Affiliate 278,986 13,089 9 62 99,752 Roscommon County Community Foundation Lead 275,729 11,727 20 2,650 45,120 Community Foundation of Monroe County Lead 271,167 14,924 11 1 Osceola County Community Foundation Affiliate 267,389 10,274 7 450 156,331 Huron County Community Foundation Lead 204,880 5,477 9 694 52,500 Ionia County Community Foundation Affiliate 181,484 4,000 3 0 68,292 Clio Area Community Fund Affiliate 177,019 5,310 7 0 34,437 Les Cheneaux Community Foundation Affiliate 162,919 6,850 7 77 38,113 Bedford Community Foundation Lead 151,104 3,000 2 4 20,000 Alger Regional Community Foundation Affiliate 149,851 10,794 10 0 31,697 St. Ignace Area Community Foundation Affiliate 144,748 6,862 9 0 38,467 Grand Blanc Community Fund Affiliate 134,826 0 0 0 10,121 Negaunee Community Fund Affiliate 131,910 6,335 8 100 35,936 South Haven Community Foundation Affiliate 129,585 9,537 6 0 40,000 Schoolcraft County Community Foundation Affiliate 123,754 5,056 10 0 20,819 Straits Area Community Foundation Affiliate 101,010 5,933 9 680 37,532 Ishpeming YAC Affiliate 93,938 4,500 11 1,815 28,242 YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC Assets, Grants and Gifts by Community Foundation Name Lead or Affiliate Assets ($) Grants 07-08 ($) # of Grants Gifts Received ($) Grants Total ($) Norway Area Community Foundation Affiliate 87,343 3,404 5 0 21,613 Wyoming Community Foundation Affiliate 71,909 2,500 3 100 23,956 Athens Area Community Foundation Affiliate 68,609 500 1 55 14,655 Otsego County Community Foundation Lead 65,776 4,451 4 0 22,500 Constantine Area Community Foundation Affiliate 65,169 4,000 5 1,200 18,109 Clare County Community Foundation Affiliate 65,125 1,150 2 200 4,900 Sparta Community Foundation Affiliate 48,655 1,500 3 255 16,909 Manistee County Community Foundation Lead 47,484 2,000 2 675 10,000 Tahquamenon Area Community Foundation Affiliate 34,483 0 0 0 500 Southeast Ottawa Community Foundation Affiliate 32,508 1,263 3 0 12,187 Sanilac County Community Foundation Lead 22,000 21,680 19 2,647 91,127 TOTAL AVERAGE YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field $ 62,294,909 $ 2,335,912 $ $ 741,606 27,808 1236 $ 160,457 15 $ 1,910 $ 25,311,022 $ 301,322 �YAC 2008 Annual Survey Data Summary MEMBERSHIP How many NEW YAC members started this year? # Total 739 Average 9 How many total YAC members? # How many total YAC members? Total 1886 22 # of YACs Average 41 45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 26 15 <15 15-30 30< Total members MEETINGS How many times did your YAC meet during the last school year? # (Average) How many times did your YAC meet during the last school year? 10 50 42 # of YACs 40 30 25 20 13 10 0 <9 9--15 # of meetings YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field 15< �YAC 2008 Annual Survey Data Summary FUND DEVELOPMENT Did your YAC engage in Fund Development Activities? # % Yes 29 35 No 53 65 Yes 35% No 65% NEEDS ASSESSMENT Did you conduct a Needs Assessment in the last 3 years? # % Yes 56 69 No 25 31 No 31% Yes 69% What are the top three issues from your most recent Needs Assessment? Issue # of times appeared in top 3 1. Alcohol/ Drug Abuse Awareness 52 2. Lack of activities for youth 3. Stress 4. Teen Pregnancy 5. Pressure to Succeed 6. Peer Pressure 19 17 14 8 8 YOUTH ON BOARD Does your CF have a youth as a voting member of their board? # % Yes 39 47 No 44 53 No 53% Some Community Foundations have more than one YAC member serving on their board, which means that collectively, MI community foundations have 50 young people serving as full voting trustees. YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field Yes 47% �YAC 2008 Annual Survey Data Summary YAC ADVISOR Do you have a YAC Advisor who is also a CF staff member? # % No - volunteer Yes - Staff 47 57 No – Volunteer only 35 43 STAFF How m any hours do staff YAC Advisors devote to the YAC each m onth? 35 Yes - staff 57% VOLUNTEER ONLY How m any hours do volunteer YAC Advisors devote to the YAC each m onth? 32 30 30 28 25 25 20 13 15 10 # of YACs # of YACs 43% 20 15 10 7 5 5 0 0 Staff <30 Staff 30< # of hours YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field Vol. <10 Vol. 10< # of hours �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC examples of high-impact and creative grantmaking: Community Foundation Albion Community Foundation Alger Regional Community Foundation Allegan County Community Foundation Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation Athens Area Community Foundation Barry Community Foundation Battle Creek Community Foundation YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field Grants The YAC granted $2,000 to purchase musical instruments that low income middle school students can use so that they may participate in the band program. A grant to "Life of Lake Superior", with experiential educational programs for youth and their parents to learn hands-on about where they live. This comprehensive learning experience includes arts, culture, economy, geography, history, natural resources and science. $3500 was granted to the Wings of Hope Hospice and Palliative Care organization in Allegan County for the Seabiscuit program that was created and designed for junior high and middle school students who are having adjustment problems related to unresolved grief. Traditional grief programs didn't reach those young people so they created a program matched to their learning styles. Professional artists work with the kids on writing projects, creating music on drums and using "junk" to make sculptures. Medicare doesn't pay for these classes but they are so successful that additional schools are requesting them. Improved attendance, better grades, and fewer behavioral issues are direct outcomes of this program. The most significant grant was the 2nd year of a 3-year, $75,000 grant to the Neutral Zone (Ann Arbor's Teen Center) for new programming at their new location. This grant was part of a larger grant (total of $150,000 over three years) made in collaboration with AAACF's Distribution Committee. This will allow NZ to focus on new program offerings to teens in the community as well as provide time for NZ to develop a strategy for long-term program sustainability. New members were very supportive of this grant even though they were not on YC when the 3 year commitment was made. Michigan Youth In Government. Through this program, the students learn the democratic process - the responsibilities of leadership, honesty, and community involvement. In Lansing, they must attend all sessions and work for bill passage or be an attorney in a mock trial. The club is led by students at the local, district, and state levels. They write bills, prepare a trial case, debate, and take on leadership roles such as committee chairs, representatives, senators, and lawyers. They also hold fundraisers to help pay for their state conference in Lansing. The experienced students mentor the new members. This year one of the youth (a senior) ran for Governor and was elected. This was truly a great example to the other youth in the community. Hastings High School SADD - The purpose of the grant was to sponsor & host a community wide Teens Against Tobacco Use training. Michigan Youth Challenge Academy: This grant paid for increased counseling services to youth that are most at risk. The grant was written by youth that had the benefit of counseling and those that still desired to get it. These young people are choosing to turn there lives around often with little or no support systems. The YAC was impressed with the extreme effort put forth and wished to reward it. �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC examples of high-impact and creative grantmaking: Community Foundation Bay Area Community Foundation Bedford Community Foundation Berrien Community Foundation Branch County Community Foundation Cadillac Area Community Foundation Capital Region Community Foundation YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field Grants United Way of Bay County requested funding for the American Dream Initiative to support a holistic program that assists parents and caregivers of elementary school children to become strong, stable, and healthy. All funding from the Youth Advisory Committee will be used to provide direct services to families. Services and activities for these families include: - Providing holistic case management services to assist parents and caregivers that will include assessment, advocacy, goal setting, evaluation, and one-on-one instruction. - Teaching Budgeting/Financial Management, Homemaking, and Parenting Skills via individual and group sessions. - Promoting education and assisting caregivers to select and enroll in college/vocational training or obtain a high school diploma to further their employment opportunities. - Providing financial incentives and supports to assist with gas, car repair, childcare, class enrollment, GED testing, and other barriers that exist for these families. - Assisting caregivers to efficiently access other needed services and resources. Boy Scout Troop 777 awarded $2,000 for their shed project. READY-Martial Arts Program: Funding provided to help reclaim some of the youth that have been lost to gang violence, school truancy, and general apathy within their environments through an established disciplined martial arts program. The Colon Community Park Project will ultimately have the greatest impact on the youth in our community both during the construction phase and once the project is completed. The park was originally designed as a community center, and the YAC had granted money to assist in the construction of the building, but after evaluation of the plan and project, the community center organizers determined a park to be a more viable option. Following this decision, earlier this year, YAC reevaluated the project and granted approximately $7,000 to assist in the creation of a park. The new park will be conveniently located in downtown Colon and will include basketball courts, picnic areas, a pavilion, tennis courts, walking trails, a skate park and an amphitheater. The YAC members also plan to volunteer their time to help physically build this park, and upon completion, the entire community will be able to enjoy the Colon Community Park. The Cadillac & Kellogg for Youth Committee showed their support for the proposed Cadillac Area YMCA through grant awards of $30,000 during this time period for the building fund of the Y. The survey carried out by the Youth Committee in 2006 showed a need in our community for recreation and specifically more programming for local teens. The new YMCA will provide those opportunities and many more for the entire community. We granted $2,500 to the Help A Willing Kid Foundation (H.A.W.K) to help cover the cost of medical (including insurance) and registration fees to the USA Amateur Sports Association for underprivileged children. �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC examples of high-impact and creative grantmaking: Community Foundation Charlevoix County Community Foundation Chippewa County Community Foundation Clare County Community Foundation Clio Area Community Fund Community Foundation for Delta County Community Foundation for Mason County Community Foundation for Muskegon County Community Foundation for Northeast Michigan YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field Grants One grant that has a large impact in our community provides weekly playgroups for families with children between the ages of birth and 48 months. Playgroups provide parents/caregivers with child development education, age appropriate toys and activities for different age and skill levels, parenting techniques and information on, and referral to, available community resources. Playgroups also provide participants the opportunity to develop a support system of other parents/caregivers with young children in their community. Last year, over 135 families attended playgroups in Charlevoix County. Many of these families are new to the area, without the support of their family and friends, increasing the sense of isolation in a rural area. Playgroups provide an invaluable service at a minimal cost. There are no eligibility requirements for playgroup participation, creating a diverse mix of families from all socio-economic backgrounds. Soo Theatre Grants - over 200 youth have been served by these grants. One of the results of the Search Institute Survey - 40 assets - showed the lack of Fine Arts opportunities for youth. These grants allowed students to participate in several summer camps and dance lessons. The Clare YAC granted money to the Harrison Summer Reading Program. This program is a great way to impact youth in the summer months. The library does a great job of finding fun and exciting things for kids to learn about in the summer. I think this grant made a great impact. For the 2007-2008 year the grant with the most impact in the Clio area would be the YWCA Chill Program grant that helped to support the cost of incentives and supplies for an anger management/ violence prevention program for Clio High School Students. The grant to the Lutheran Social Services of Wisconsin and Upper Michigan for the Voices for Youth Transitional Living Program. This program provides temporary housing for youth age 17-21 that are homeless. The program helps to find them jobs, teaches them how to live on their own, and helps them finish their high school education if necessary. It has a great impact on those youth and the community because it provides them a safe place to stay while giving them the necessary skills to be productive members of the community. Gave $6,000 to the City of Ludington to finish a youth skate park. The YAC selected Teen Pregnancy as a major focus area for the 2008 grant year and as part of that, they heard from a number of agencies that impact teenage pregnancy in Muskegon County. One agency, Catholic Charities West Michigan, received a $9,605 grant from the YAC to help support their teen parent program which provides ongoing support for teenage parents. One of the most impressive things about this program is that it is open to both male and female teenage parents. The program is free of charge and helps teen parents manage duties such as childcare, schooling, infant supplies, etc. The YAC especially liked this grant because of the broad range of students that are served in Muskegon County and the idea of both female and male parents being helped. The YAC members recommended a grant of $2,300 to a Children's Mural Art Project for Cancer Survivors. This project is expected to involve 60 children in the production of a permanent "mural of hope" to express the community's on-going care for residents of all ages who have been touched by cancer. The children in our region will produce a mural to be permanently installed in the outdoor garden area at the Alpena Cancer Center. This artwork will be reproduced on a mobile banner for use throughout the region. �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC examples of high-impact and creative grantmaking: Community Foundation Grants Community Foundation for Oceana County A local camp, Camp Miniwanca (American Youth Foundation), not historically known for interacting with local youth, decided to create a Youth Leadership Institute. They invited high school youth from one of the county's school districts (Shelby High School) to come to the camp one day / month for the entire school year. The youth were engaged in leadership activities and at the conclusion of the year, led the district's 4th grade students in a day-long leadership program at the camp. Many students were impacted by this program and the camp is now expanding the program to 2 more school districts. The Oceana YAC granted twice to this program. A $15,000 grant was awarded in September ‘07 to the city of Wayne to support the construction of a fully accessible playscape. This amount was supplemented by additional funds from the Access to Recreation Initiative, resulting in a grant award totaling $40,000. The project is unique in that it is positioned to serve both as a neighborhood park as well as the playground for a school located in that neighborhood. The school, which serves children with special needs from the entire district, did not have playground equipment at the school site to accommodate all of the children. The youth were involved in the concept and design process from the very beginning, culminating in a community build to construct the playground itself. The grant award had a significant impact on the youth it serves, the neighborhood at large, and city’s policies in regard to playground construction. The project also allowed CFSEM to expose YAC participants to a broader set of foundation activities by introducing them to the Access to Recreation Initiative. The grant that probably had the most impact on the community would be the Help Stuff A Backpack Campaign that provided school supplies for 269 needy families and also supported the Newspaper in Education program for area elementary schools. Whiteford Agricultural Schools - $1250 Challenge Day grant Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan Community Foundation of Greater Flint Community Foundation of Monroe County Community Foundation of St. Clair County Constantine Area Community Foundation Coopersville Area YAC YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field The YAC gave a $25,000 grant to St. Clair County RESA to help fund a full time higher education counselor. The counselor will help students from all St. Clair County High Schools prepare for college- ACT/SAT testing, stress management, time management, etc. We have not seen the impact yet, but I do believe this will have the largest impact on our youth as public schools are struggling with budgets and staffing. It seems counselors have been overwhelmed with day to day activities and do not have enough time and resources to properly assist the students in preparing to go to college. Grant to Constantine Middle School to bring in the assembly "Behind the Faces" for students in grades 6-11, and for the community in the evening. This was a wonderful production that sent the kids some very strong messages. The program was appreciated by all who attended and received great reviews. The major topics addressed were bullying and substance abuse. The Coopersville Area Reading Bus. The program started this year and a used school bus was outfitted for library materials. It goes out to the outlying areas and brings reading materials to youth that are not able to get to the community library. It has been received well by all and its user numbers continue to grow. �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC examples of high-impact and creative grantmaking: Community Foundation Crystal Falls Area Community Foundation Dickinson Area Community Foundation Fenton Community Fund Four County Community Foundation Fremont Area Community Foundation Grand Blanc Community Fund Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Grand Rapids Community Foundation Grand Traverse Regional Community Foundation Gratiot County Community Foundation YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field Grants The grant that has had the most impact on the Crystal Falls Community this past grant cycle was the money given to the City of Crystal Falls to help build a soccer field/youth football field at the Runkle Lake Park complex. For seven years, the youth of Crystal Falls have been a part of the SAY Soccer Association. The Crystal Falls area has approximately 140 children that participate in soccer yet the community did not have a field to play on until now. Granting funds to the Dickinson County Water Ski Club for jump pad resurfacing. Many area youth participate in the Ski-ters program which attracts visitors to the area throughout the summer months. There were actually three grants that combined impacted a significant number of youth in the South Lakes Area. The grants were to support Project Graduation at three separate high schools in the area. Over 300 youth were potentially impacted. SERVE (Students Enriching Romeo through Volunteer Experience) Program student lead events. We support special events planned with Senior Citizens through out the year which the SERVE students plan and conduct. Approximately 450 students and senior citizens participate in events through the year. Examples of events include: a senior prom which has featured the high school jazz band and a DJ and they teach each other dance steps from their generations; a Christmas Dinner demonstrating music, dancing and drama performed by the students & the students serve the seniors their meal; theme and game luncheons are also held. The interaction of the youth and seniors is a positive experience for all. The Fremont YAC supported a grant of $12,500 from the Youth Endowment Fund of the Fremont Area Community Foundation toward the support of "The Refuge" bike park and hiking trails. The youth were excited about having a multi-use park in the area. YAC members were particularly interested in the uniqueness of this type of park to the area, with the possibility of attracting people from outside the area as well. Because the YAC was in need of rebuilding, there were no grants made during this period. The new members that were recruited during this time period were initially invited to participate on the YAC of the lead Foundation - county-wide YAC of Greater Flint. They will start as the active Grand Blanc group and help to recruit and train new members in September 2008. In 2007, 92 Tri-Cities youth were reported as homeless, 70 of whom were between the ages of 16 and 19. A grant from the Youth Fund is supporting the efforts of the Youth Homelessness Task Force in raising community awareness and engaging local service providers to create a service plan designed for these vulnerable youth. The YGC supported a youth program at New Hope Church that partnered youth with residents of a senior living facility in the neighborhood. Together, the youth and seniors made picnic tables for the senior center to provide an area for visiting and enjoying the outdoors. Host Homes for Homeless Youth, through Catholic Human Services, was a program that received support from each of the five counties in our Youth Grantmaker program. A group of middle school art students received a grant to fund painting windows in downtown businesses for the annual Highland Festival. The scenes of Scottish hillsides and pipers connected businesses, community and tourists together for the event. �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC examples of high-impact and creative grantmaking: Community Foundation Hillsdale County Community Foundation Homer Area Community Foundation Huron County Community Foundation Ionia County Community Foundation Iosco County Community Foundation Ishpeming YAC Jackson Community Foundation YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field Grants $4,000 proactive grant based on a desire and a need to beautify local communities within Hillsdale County. The YOUTH pondered various projects we could fund that would make a significant impact throughout the entire county. Modeling our idea after a program currently in existence in the city of Detroit, called “Summer in the City Detroit”, the YOUTH opted to support our local communities by providing small, proactive mini-grants to encourage beautification projects. One of our members learned about the Detroit-based community service organization last summer at the Youth Grantmakers Summer Leadership Conference, and brought the idea back to the other members, who were very excited about the concept. This was truly a county-wide initiative, with a huge geographic area able to directly benefit. $500 per area will greatly help out some of our communities, and it has enabled us to create a relationship with our local government officials, who we don’t normally interact with in our regular grant application processes. To the Homer Public Library for a summer reading program to keep the fun of reading going all summer long with special presentations. The Youth Advisory Committee committed $2,000 as a partial down payment on a homeless youth home. Kenny's Inc, a local non-profit is seeking to purchase a home in the heart of Huron County and help troubled teens get back on track and graduate from high school. The YAC are active participants in the Huron County Homeless Coalition and this project can have a large impact on homeless teens. Providing support for a year-end "prom" for special education/special needs high school students. YAC awarded a grant to fund guest speakers (Dr. Michael Fowlin, Eric Hipple, Ben Glenn, and others) to perform before a middle and high school audience. I attended the presentation as a site visit. The messages were serious, yet incredibly thoughtprovoking and inspiring. After each presentation, the entire student body gave both Dr. Fowlin and Ben Glenn a standing ovation – without suggestion from any adults. I've never seen so many teenagers fixated and enthralled by someone! This grant seemed to really open the eyes of many students and the reviews that came back were amazing. The entire day focused on most of the important issues YAC has identified through its needs assessment. We granted funding to a local agency to assist children with disabilities to learn to ride a bicycle without training wheels. During the holidays, our YAC offered a challenge to the 17 school districts in Jackson County. Any district that held a food drive could designate a food pantry or organization to receive a $1,000 donation from the YAC. All 17 districts participated, so besides thousands of food items collected, $17,000 was distributed to organizations. This challenge not only validated the charitable efforts of youth in Jackson County, but also promoted awareness of the YAC. �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC examples of high-impact and creative grantmaking: Community Foundation Kalamazoo Community Foundation Keweenaw Community Foundation Lapeer County Community Foundation Leelanau Township Community Foundation Lenawee Community Foundation Les Cheneaux Community Foundation M&M Area Community Foundation YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field Grants The grant the group decided to nominate as a MCFYP Great Grant went to Reach and Teach Alternative High School for an afterschool remodeling project. Although those attending this school have been expelled from their home school, alternative teaching styles have proven to be successful for a high percentage of Reach and Teach students. The school recently moved into a new facility with large open spaces that needed to be turned into smaller classrooms. Our grant for $4,497.00 is for tools and materials to build walls for the classrooms to be used by volunteer retired construction workers and students in creating these spaces. The students are learning a valuable trade; the retired carpenters enjoy mentoring the students. They expect the students will take better care of their classrooms, showing pride in the work they did in creating spaces. This is a direct impact on a small group of youth who attend the school, however by giving youth who are more at risk to negative behaviors a positive experience and skill, the entire community benefits! Grant given to the Tamarack City Park Committee to purchase playground equipment for a new park in Tamarack City. Going Green Maple Grove Elementary Student Council Recycling Program: This is a pilot program for recycling in one of the elementary schools in our largest school district as a partnership with the "Green School" designation from the State of Michigan. Interest has already been generated at one of the high schools to follow this pattern. With 11 school buildings in the district, this can have a significant impact on the environment and hopefully carry over to a county-wide program which does not currently exist in Lapeer County. This was also one of the summary points from the education section of our Envisioning Lapeer County's Future done in 2007 in which our YAC President participated. Funded the purchase of the video series "The Color of Fear" which teaches cultural sensitivity. The LYC funded a 12 step program for teens. Originally the agency received funding for one group, but it quickly became apparent that there was need for two groups: one for males and another for females. The LYC funded the program for two 12 step support groups for teens battling substance abuse issues. The adult programs are not appropriate or safe places for teens to go and substance abuse has been identified as a critical issue in our community. A $1,000 grant to start an elementary branch of the YAC that teaches philanthropy to elementary students. The youth members mentor the younger students about philanthropy and grantmaking. It serves as a way to introduce what YAC is for future recruiting efforts as well. The YAC made a $2,500 grant to the Healthy Youth Coalition to fund a media campaign. The goals were: - Educate youth and adults in our community on the dangers of alcohol, tobacco, drugs, and violence through youth developed radio spots, billboards and print campaigns. - Begin to change community norms and attitudes about alcohol use and violence. - Build our youth's self confidence, self respect, self reliance, resistance skills and responsibility through positive peer and adult influences. - Provide youth with creative activities and a community that values youth. - Provide leadership opportunities to all high school youth from the twin counties we serve. - Utilize youth as a resource by having them develop and record radio spots, research and design billboards and write newspaper articles. �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC examples of high-impact and creative grantmaking: Community Foundation Mackinac Island Community Foundation Manistee County Community Foundation Marquette Community Foundation Marshall Community Foundation Mecosta County Community Foundation Michigan Gateway Community Foundation Midland Area Community Foundation Mt. Pleasant Area Community Foundation YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field Grants A Program to bring a deaf rapper to the school. This young man awed the students with his story of overcoming the adversity of his handicap. Showing them how hard work and perseverance can pay off, as in his national recording contract. The Very Special Arts grant in the amount of $1,200 had great impact. It involved teaching special education students how to use various art mediums to create a beautiful work of art that enhanced the community. It also increased the public’s awareness of the talents of people with disabilities. They worked with multiple schools and have learned new techniques that they will continue to teach and apply. The YAC granted funding of $10,000.00 to an organization which will build a permanent skate park in the City of Marquette. I believe the YAC grant impacting our community the most was the $17,424 grant to fund "After School Arts Workshop" programs at the Marshall District Library. The YACkers were committed to offering very positive after-school programming to area youth. A grant to District Health Department #10 for the "Girls On The Run Program". This program provides an opportunity for low income girls to participate in this program to improve their bodily condition and enhance their self esteem. Big Brothers/Big Sisters: The grant was to create 20 mentorships dedicated to south Berrien County and to establish 2 partnerships with area firms to encourage employees to serve as mentors to children. "Literacy Magazine": Midland's Creative Spirit Arts Center was awarded $700 to assist with the costs associated with the publication of "Beat the Drum!” a new, student-led literary magazine. This project was initiated by a local 9th grade student who was interning at the Creative Spirit Arts Center. In addition to publishing creative writing and pen-and-ink drawings from the youth in Midland County, the magazine also provided leadership experience for the youth who sat on the editorial board, the contributors, and the youth who edited and distributed the publication. An excerpt from the grant application describes why publishing creative works by youth is so important: "For some young people, these times of transition can be puzzling, stressful, and even painful, as social systems and institutions deliver surprising and unfamiliar challenges. For students with a literary or artistic temperament, writing, drawing, and painting help to communicate their experiences both to themselves and to others. Sharing with peers helps them muster the resilience needed to negotiate what lies ahead." The YAC awarded 4 grants to the Health Department. Collectively, they supported disease prevention & several health and safety issues affecting children & their families. One project called the "Photovoice Project" has not been completed but may have an important impact. Student volunteers from local high schools will be recruited for the project with 3 goals: Photovoice gives young people 1) The opportunity to record and reflect (with photos they take and narratives they write) their community strengths and problems. 2) Promotes discussion about important issues through group discussion and the photographs. 3) Gets the attention of policymakers to encourage needed change. The project empowers youth to have their needs noted and discussed. Individual pictures accompanied by narratives are powerful messages; however, the collection and presentation of hundreds of youth pictures and related narratives all in one place (community presentation) can have a significant effect on community opinions and goals for youth. �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC examples of high-impact and creative grantmaking: Community Foundation Negaunee Community Fund North Central Michigan Community Foundation Norway Area Community Foundation Osceola County Community Foundation Otsego County Community Foundation Petoskey-Harbor Springs Area Community Foundation Roscommon County Community Foundation YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field Grants To the Negaunee High School for a Peer Coach Community Experience, which teaches youth to be community leaders Each YAC (Crawford, Ogemaw, and Oscoda County) awarded a grant to River House Shelter (for protecting women and children against domestic violence) to purchase toys, a basketball court, and security cameras. This facility serves a large geographical area and YAC members felt it was truly important for children living at the shelter to be able to have healthy activities that would help them be physically active, provide learning opportunities, and feel safe during their time there. Child abuse is among the issues identified as needing funding by NCMCF's last needs assessment. One of our most important uses of our grant money was the "Mock Accident" presentation. It was a very dramatic way to teach the youth of our community the consequences of their choices when choosing to drink and drive. This presentation involved the whole community. Mini-grants for educators: This grant benefits youth in every section of Osceola County by working with the schools. It also covers all age groups by involving programs from K-12 grade levels. All schools in Michigan are faced with serious budget problems. The Mini-grants for Educators program helps with equipment and materials that the schools budgets are not capable of funding. Friendship Shelter Youth mentoring: Furniture, computers and supplies, plus pay for the mentoring for children lodged at the Friendship Shelter. There was no opportunity for them to keep up. The grant to the local YMCA for equipment and financial scholarships for their summer day camp has had a tremendous impact. It may not be a visible impact, but this kind of support for working families or single parents in the summer time is invaluable. Our YAC has been providing this annual support since inception of the Y summer camp about four years ago. Summer time is a very difficult time for working parents or single parents with little kids. School may be out for the kids, but mom and/or dad still need to work full-time jobs to make ends meet. Many summer activity options in our community are financially out of reach for many families/parents. The Y day camp is affordable and they are able to provide financial assistance to those moms and/or dads (or grandparents!) who need it. Our YAC recommended funding for the Houghton Lake Little League to pay for the siding, electrical and plumbing for the new concession stand at our new Sports Complex. This is part of a "Special Project Fund" at the RCCF that was started in memory of a local Houghton Lake student who was killed by a drunk driver while riding his bike. He was only 10 years old. The Sports Complex is being funded by donations to the Ryan McDonald Memorial Fund and most of the work is being donated by local contractors in Ryan's memory. The Sports Complex will allow the Houghton Lake Little League to host regional tournaments which will not only allow our local youths to play, but will also allow teams from many other areas to get to use our complex. It will also help our local economy, which relies almost solely on tourism. The concession stand was part of Phase I of the project so that they will have some income available to help toward the rest of the project. �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC examples of high-impact and creative grantmaking: Community Foundation Saginaw Community Foundation Sanilac County Community Foundation Schoolcraft County Community Foundation Shiawassee Community Foundation South Haven Community Foundation Southeast Ottawa Community Foundation Sparta Community Foundation St. Ignace Area Community Foundation Straits Area Community Foundation Sturgis Area Community Foundation YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field Grants I think the Youth Farm Stand Project had the most impact. FORCE made a grant to a neighborhood coalition that built a community garden. It was planted and grown by youth. After the vegetables were ready to pick, students sold them at the Farmer's Market. They had a prime location there where they got to share the story of their success, which came to them at a huge cost. Soon after the garden was planted, it was vandalized. The story in the newspaper talked about how the kids were upset, but that they weren't going to stay down. With several community members stepping up with new donations, the youth restored their garden and saw great results! M.O.V.E. Program which was awarded to the Sanilac County ISD to purchase equipment to assist severely handicapped students to become more independently mobile. Although this program assists a small number of young people, the impact it has had on those lives has been tremendous. Central Park Grant - $2,000.00 grant which was matched $6,000.00. Development of Central Park in Manistique that will serve all of Schoolcraft County. Youth will finally have facilities to swim, fish, play tennis, basketball, shoot archery, etc. The summer pantry grants for our American Red Cross helped in addressing the growing demand for food for those in need during the summer (not just during the holidays). Youth and Company, a summer park program. To provide scholarships to participate in the Miles for Mentoring 5K and a Mentoring Weekend. These events recruited new mentors for unmatched youth and provided activities for mentoring matches in Southeast Ottawa. To target 1st through 3rd grade free or reduced lunch students who are significantly below grade level in reading, writing, and spelling but do not qualify for special education services and who attend a Sparta Public Schools. A grant to the city St. Ignace for new tennis courts. The courts were in major disrepair and are widely used by everyone in the community. YAC awarded a mini-grant to the special education program at Wolverine Community Schools called "Bringing the Classics to Life". The grant provided funding for classic books that were adapted in a way that would make them easier to read and comprehend for special education students. To date, this was the first grant YAC had awarded to this population of youth. Grant to Sturgis Middle School for a program called "Be the Change: Challenge Day"-all 7th graders in our community attended this 2 day program which addressed issues such as bullying; racial issues; violence; substance abuse etc. Parent and adult volunteers from the community also participated and the program was extraordinarily well received by everyone involved. It includes follow up via the group's website to keep the students focused on the changes discovered through the program. �YAC 2008 Annual Survey YAC examples of high-impact and creative grantmaking: Community Foundation Grants The Community Foundation of the Holland/Zeeland Area Our YAC identified the Lakeshore Honors Basketball League as their "Great Grant" for the CMF YAC Conference and I also think that this grant has had, and will continue to have, a tremendous impact on youth in our area. The Lakeshore Honors Basketball League offers at-risk youth the opportunity to participate in a team sport while removing many of the barriers that often stand in the way of their participating in team sports through the school system. Being a member of one of the League's teams provides young people with a peer support group that will challenge them to do their best on and off the court, connects them with the positive influence of coaches who care about them and serve as role models, and helps them to develop a healthy sense of identity and self-worth. The Lakeshore Honors Basketball League seeks to ensure that every youth has access to the team sports experience and the benefits that can develop out of that experience. A project entitled "Oceans Alive!" was granted to Kingston Elementary School. The grant totaling $2,450.00 helped to bring a salt water ocean into the elementary school which had a positive learning impact on 360 children in the building. A 100 gallon salt water fish tank was purchased and filled with angelfish, scallops and all kinds of unique and amazing ocean fish. Students no longer have to wonder what an ocean looks like; they can see it in the 4th grade classroom of Mr. Lane Walker. This joint effort with the community foundation YAC included a local bank, parent teacher organization and local business. These organizations made this special project come to life. A grant was made to Planned Parenthood to impact the rate of teen pregnancy. Tuscola County Community Foundation Wyoming Community Foundation YAC 2008 Annual Survey Report to the Field �The Council of Michigan Foundations is a membership association of nearly 400 grantmaking organizations working together to strengthen, promote, and increase philanthropy in Michigan. ────────────────────────────────── GRAND HAVEN OFFICE One South Harbor Avenue, Suite 3 Grand Haven, MI 49417 Phone: 616.842.7080 Fax: 616.842.1760 SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN OFFICE 100 Talon Centre Drive, Suite 150 Detroit, MI 48207 Phone: 313.566.2444 Fax: 313.566.2445 www.michiganfoundations.org www.youthgrantmakers.org www.forgoodforever.org www.growingcf.org � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_Data-Book Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008 Data Book Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008 Data Book. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50751 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/dba820a6cc8d631f341f0223c3b6a8cb.pdf f367b9ae577e46f91b4ba2bbddce8d06 PDF Text Text Thinking About College Access What is College Access? Why is College Access so Important? Why Create a College Access Network? "It would be very difficult for you to affect and change a student's family income or his/her parents' education level. But you can help a student to go to college knowing that after college that student will experience success at the same rate as his/her seemingly more advantaged peers." Changing the Face of Education 3 National College Access Network �Thinking About College Access Thinking About College Access What is College Access? Why is College Access so Important? For our purposes, we will use "College Access" to mean the provision of hands-on, one-on-one advising to individuals to encourage and help them pursue and complete education beyond high school. Typically, a college access program serves students of tradit ional high school or college age who, because of various challenges including low socioeconomic status, lack of college educated role models, under-resourced high schools, etc. are unlikely to make a successful transition from high school to college without some outside assistance. Many college access programs also serve adults seeking to return to or enroll in college for the first time. In addition to providing counseling assistance, many college access programs provide "last dollar" scholarships to the students they serve. NCAN's goal is simple. We assume yours is as well: to help more low-income, first-generation or underrepresented students go on to college. "College" when used here refers to a Pell-eligible educational institution heyond th~ high school l~v~l. including thos~ th;,t off~r apprenticeship programs, certificates, and associate and/or bachelor degree programs. We use the word "college" because it is more familiar to most people and less pedantic than "postsecondary study." In the 21st century's information-driven service economy, a college education is critical to achieving professional and personal success. Those individuals who have a bachelor's degree (or higher), for example, earn $19,000 more per year (in 2006 dollars) than those with a high school diploma and encounter only about half the unemployment rate of those with just a high school diploma. Increased income of approximately $1 ,000,000 over a lifetime is just one of many rewards for the average college graduate when compared to someone with only a high school education. This is why we often call the decision on whether or not to go to college the "$1 ,000,000 decision." The rate at which students enroll in and complete college is dramatically influenced by their parents' education level, fam ily income, course selection and high school performance. However, after completing college, there is no difference in the success of those who are the first generation in their fam ilies to attend c:oll~ge ilS comp;,red with those whose p;,r~nts who have degrees. Advantages of a College Degree (U.S. Department of Education) • • • • • • • • • • • • Increased earnings Greater fringe benefits Better working conditions Better ability to select appropriate savings instruments Better health and longer life Lower disability rates Fewer unwanted children Better health of children Tendency to select spouse with higher earning potential Tendency to make more informed purchases Tendency to raise children in ways that enhance the effects of formal schooling Increased chances that children will attend college Guide to Creating a Statewide College Access Network National College Access Network 4 �Thinking About College Access Why Create a College Access Network? There are many ways to guide students toward achieving college access. A statewide Network is a unique college access support system that is usually focused on the creation and sustainability of community-based college access organizations. Unlike other member organizations and associations, a Network not only concentrates on supporting its members but also focuses on replicating successful college access programs across the entire state. The Network staff analyzes the college access needs of the state, identifies existing programs and then creates a plan to fill the gaps in services to lowincome, first generation potential college students. If your plan is to limit the scope of your services to those attending a particular school district or living in a certain county, you should build a college access program. If you want to reach students throughout the state, you should create a statewide college access network. This guidebook will not tell you how to build various college access programs; other NCAN guidebooks are devoted to that (visit www.CollegeAccess.org to view additional guidebooks). Rather, this guidebook will describe how you can build a Network that will create and support multiple college access programs. Education, Earnings, and Tax Payments Median Earnings and Tax Payments by Level of Education, 2003 Professional Degree $26,700 $95,700 Docrorate Degree $21,200 $79,400 ============I $14,900 $59,500 Master's Degree Bachelor's Degree Associate Degree $11,900 $49,900 ======~ I $8,600 $37,600 I Some College, No Degree $8,100 $35,700 Taxes Paid After-Tax Income I High School Graduate $6,700 $30,800 I Not a High School Graduate $4,300 $21,600 I $0 $20K $40K $60K $80K $100K Notes: Includes full-t ime, year.round workers age 25 and older. Tax payments are based on 2002 tax rates and do not incorporate the 2003 feOOral income tax reductions. Source: U.S. Census Bureau, 2004, PINC-03: Internal Revenue Service, 2003, Table 3: Mcintyre, et al, 2003: calculations by the authors. Sollee: Baum, Sandy & Payea, Kathleen. Education Pays 2004: The Benefits o f Higher Education for Individuals and Society, Trend in Higher Education Series, The College Board, Revised Edition 2005, p10. Changing the Face of Education 5 National College Access Network � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Thinking-About-College-Access Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book thinking about college access Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book thinking about college access. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50750 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/71ec6eb1a634564ba1ffcabaaf75251c.pdf 271494e1c33a88dc4399d9b89cc464dd PDF Text Text CMF Counci l of Michi an Foun:fations Serving grantmakers. Advandn9 giving. October 1, 2008 Memo To: Diana Sieger, Chairperson and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Susan Broman, David Egner, Carol Goss - Public Policy Committee CoChairs and Dana Linnane, Public Policy Fellow Re: Public Policy Report As highlighted below, since the May 2008 Board meeting: • affinity groups have hosted a number of meetings; • numerous policy-related articles have been published; and • the fall/winter schedule of meetings, conferences, and briefings is shaping up. I. Meetings since the May 2008 Board Meeting • Michigan Grantmakers in Aging o Michigan EngAGEment Initiative Briefing at the Flint County Community Foundation (June 24). Funders and community leaders from Genesee, Lapeer, and Shiawassee Counties joined together, along with geriatrician Dr. Matthew Weiss, and worked to create a vision of possibilities for addressing current and future needs of older adults. o GIA 2009 spring conference committee planning meetings (June 30, July 30, August 25, and September 29) • Arts Affinity Group o Meeting with Arts Affinity Group members and representatives from the Department of Histories, Arts, and Libraries and the Pew Charitable Trusts to discuss Michigan's implementation of the Cultural Data Project (July 25) o Cultural Data Project Task Force Meetings (June 30, August 5, August 18, and September 15). A memo sent in May to the CMF Community Foundation Committee regarding the Cultural Data Project is enclosed as ATTACHMENT A. • Funders on Michigan's Economy o Foreclosure Briefing (June 4) • Michigan College Access Network o Network Workgroup Meetings (July 15, August 6, and September 18) o At the August MCAN meeting, representatives from the National College Access Network presented the national access model. Information shared with funders regarding the NCAN model is enclosed as ATTACHMENT B. • Michigan Land Use Funders' Meeting (June 9 and August 21) • Michigan Access to Recreation Policy Advisory Committee Meeting (September I I) • K-16 Education Funders o Leadership Planning Meeting (May22) o Funders Meeting (September 22). Chuck Wilbur, senior policy advisor to Governor Granholm, briefed funders regarding the new 21st Century Schools Fund legislation. lnfonnation regarding 21 st Century Schools Fund included as ATTACHMENT C. �Public Policy Report Page 2 • Michigan Grantmakers for Women & Girls o The White House Project Funders Reception & Go Run Training (May 30) o Funders Annual Meeting (June 12) II. Public Policy Communications Since the May Board Meeting, CMF published eleven policy-related News Wire articles and shared 21 public policy resources via the monthly E-News. CMF NewsWire 9/ 16/08 New Senate Philanthropy Caucus To Help Foundations & Congress Work Together • 9/ 12/08 Governor Asks Foundations' Help In Replacing Large, Ineffective High Schools • 8/20/08 New Housing Bills Expected To Help Michigan Deal With Its Foreclosure Crisis 8/ 13/08 New State Advisory Council For Promising Prisoner Re-Entry Initiative • Granholm Announces Invest Michigan! Fund To Spur Economic Development; 8/6/08 • Foundations Asked To Help • 7/ 16/08 Kellogg Foundation-Funded Report Used As Key Document in State Education Budget Discussions 6/27/08 Environmental Threats Impacting Young Girls & Women, Say National Experts • Devastating Impact of Michigan's Foreclosure Crisis 6119/08 • Congress Passes New & Extended Charitable Legislation; IRA Charitable 6/6/08 • Rollover Fate Still Pending • 5/ 19/08 Foundations Working To Reduce Foreclosures in Western Michigan • 5/ 16/08 Redesigning Detroit's Food Systems Will Help ln1prove Health, Economy • E-News August 2008 • Outline of Changes to the Michigan Tax System • Health Insurance Coverage of Young Adults • Population Changes Across U.S. Counties • Community Smart Growth Readiness Assessment Tool • Revitalizing Arts Education Through Community-Wide Coordination July 2008 • Reforming the System of Care: A Review of Literature on Housing and Service Arrangements for Homeless Populations • A Complex Systems Approach to Understanding and Combating the Obesity Epidemic • Closing the Achievement Gap Series • Exploring Rural Context and Opportunities: A Report to the National Fund for Workforce Solutions • New Economic Development Tools June 2008 • Citizens Research Council: Michigan's Fiscal Future • Growth in Michigan' s Corrections System: Historical and Comparative Perspectives �Public Policy Report Page 3 • • • • The Economic Impact of Health Care in Michigan IT as Public Policy: The Case of Municipal Wireless Initiatives Michigan in the National KIDS COUNT Data Book 2008 Why Supporting Advocacy Makes Sense for Foundations May 2008 • Educational Access: Technology Counts 2008 • The Housing and Transportation Affordability Index • Michigan Strategic Opportunities for Rural Health hnprovement • Arts & Culture Advocacy Toolkit • Life After Lockup: Improving Reentry from Jail to Community III. Upcoming Meetings The following meetings are planned or in development: • Food Policy Funders Meeting in Lansing (October 22) • Michigan Grantmakers in Aging attend National GIA conference (October 28-31) • CMF Public Policy Cmmnittee Meeting (November) • K-16 Education Data Summit (November) • Michigan Land Use Funders' Meeting (November) • EngAGEment Conference in Lansing (May 2009) �CMF Council of Michi an Foun~tions Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. Date: May 20, 2008 To: Brenda Hunt, Chair, CMF Community Foundation Committee From: Jaclyn Miel-Uken, Public Policy Fellow Re: Cultural Data Project Last month, the CMF Arts Affinity Group explored the Cultural Data Project (CDP) and charged an Advisory Group with the task of detem1ining if and how the project should come to Michigan. On May 13, the Advisory Group, co-chaired by Warren Goodell of the Southfield Community Foundation, determined that the project was desirable and feasible. This summer and fall, a series of regional presentations on the CDP and a fundraising campaign will begin. The Advisory Group would like to invite community foundations to participate in these regional briefings. About the CDP The Cultural Data Project was founded and is administrated by the Pew Charitable Trusts. The Cultural Data Project is a data-collection system that is standardized, statewide and securely Web-based. Nonprofit arts and culture organizations fi le their organizational and financial information online once a year and then use the information to apply to grants. Arts and cultural organizations can also use the data to benchmark themselves against other organizations using a variety of searchable criteria (type, size, geography, audience, etc.) The online data system eases the burden for both grantmakers and grantees. Grantmakers have ready access to the requisite information for due diligence and can get a sense of how their grantees measure up; grantees only have to file their infom1ation once annually instead of each time they apply for a grant. Furthem1ore, the CDP provides a powerful basis for advocacy. One noted problem in Michigan is that the data aren 't standardized or reliable and therefore campaigns, for example, about the economic impact of the sector, are not effective. The CDP data in other states has supported successful advocacy campaigns around this and other topics. The Cultural Data Project is expanding nationally. The CDP is currently operating in California, Maryland and Pennsylvania. Arts and culture organizations in these states can benchmark against each other as well as their instate counterparts. New York, Ohio, and �now Michigan, are planning to launch new statewide projects. Since the data are standardized, this tool has the potential to become comparable at the national level. For more information, please visit the Pew Charitable Trusts at http://www.pewtrusts.org/our work detail.aspx?id=20 and contact the CMF public policy fellow at jmieluken@michiganfoundations.org. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Public-Policy Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book public policy Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book public policy. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50749 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/8916ee7a58a058e24fdfe9dc9d08b8db.pdf ee6c34f64a87602547cb759f03ca8191 PDF Text Text CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes Tuesday, May 20, 2008 Ziibiwing Center, Mt. Pleasant The Meeting of the Board of Trustees of the Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF) was held at the Ziibiwing Center on Tuesday, May 20, 2008, pursuant to written notice duly given. Chairperson Diana R. Sieger called the meeting to order at 2:00 p.m. Trustees and Officers present: Caroline E. Chambers Robert S. Collier Thomas B. Cook Wesley H. Maurer, Jr. Rachel Mraz Phillip H. Peters Carol Paine-McGovern Thomas S. Porter DavidS. Sebastian Christian A. Velasquez Daniel J. Wyant Guests: Karen Aldridge-Eason, Foundation Liaison Shirley Martin Decker, Mt. Pleasant Area Community Foundation Steve Martineau, Mt. Pleasant Area Community Foundation Dr. Mike Rao, Central Michigan University Stan Rathburn, Mt. Pleasant Area Community Foundation Joe Sowmick, Saginaw Chippewa Indian Tribe Staff: Susan Cuddington, Executive Assistant to the President Jeri Fischer, Director, Membership & Special Projects Mike Gallagher, Editorial Consultant Mike Goorhouse, Program Assistant, Youth Philanthropy Susan Howbert, Director, Family Philanthropy David Lindberg, Vice President, Finance & Administration Dana Linnane, Public Policy Fellow Becky Noricks, Communications Manager Surabhi Pandit, Russell G . Mawby Intern Vicki Rosenberg, Vice President, Education, Communications & External Relations ACTION ITEMS Consent Agenda Upon motion duly made, supported and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the Consent Agenda items be approved: February 12, 2008 Board of Trustees Meeting Minutes May 2, 2008 Executive C ommittee Minutes �Board Mi nutes May 20,2008 Page 2 Financial Report/Internal Statements for March 31, 2008 Investment Committee Report for March 31, 2008 Treasurer's Report/ Year E nd Audit Treasurer Phil Peters and Dave Lindberg presented the 2008-2007 Audit Report, noting the report was not available for print until the morning of the Board Meeting. He reviewed CMF's eleven endowment funds and the new Board designated fund approved in May 2007. Due to the late distribution of the Audit Report, the motion to approve the Audit was tabled until the next regularly scheduled Board Meeting. Upon motion duly made, it was RESOLVED to postpone the motion to approve the Audit Report until the next scheduled Board Meeting, October 13, 2008. Amendments to Articles and Bylaws re: Electronic C ommunication Rob Collier introduced the amendments to the Michigan Nonprofit Corporation Act now signed into law that pennit the use of electronic transmission, such as email for notices, waivers of notice, proxies, written consents and voting when participating in a meeting by remote communication. Dave Lindberg noted a I 00% response rate is required to take action if the vote it is presented by electronic means. Depending on how a foundation's articles or bylaws are written, amendments may need to be made. CMF will be sending out an announcement of this change to the membership. Upon motion duly made, supported and unanimously approved, it was RRSOT ,VRD that the Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws be amended as attached and prepared by legal counsel to respond to changes in the Michigan Nonprofit Corporation Act to allow for electronic communication. Membership and Dues Increase Marketing Plan Rob Collier presented the Membership Report. In an effort to reach out and recruit more corporate giving programs, the Membership Committee recommended lowering the threshold criteria for corporate giving programs to $25, 000 over a five year period. Upon motion duly made, supported and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the criteria for membership for the category: C orporate Giving Programs and Consultant Service Business be changed from "Must make annual grants to charitable organizations in excess of $50,000 ... " to "Must make grants to charitable organizations of $25,000 over a five year period." Government Relations Committee Co-Chair Carol Paine-McGovern presented the Government Relations update. Thirty-five members participated on the visit to Capitol Hill in March. Ms. Paine-McGovern reported the Mott Foundation has issued a grant to CMF to retain Cambridge & Associates to perform an analysis on what the current revenue neutral number should be to simplify the excise tax to a flat tax. To support this effort, Goal 4 from the approved CMF Legislative Goals Statement needs to be changed. �Board M in utes May 20, 2008 Page 3 Upon motion duly made, supported and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that Goal 4 be amended from repeal of the excise tax on private foundations to support simplification of the excise tax on private foundations. Ms. Paine-McGovern presented a recommendation that CMF, as the leading regional association of grantmakers, take a position on legislation initiated by the Greenlining Institute in California that they are trying to get introduced in four additional states and with Congress. The Board discussed the widespread opposition to the bill by the Council on Foundations, Independent Sector, and the California regional associations of grantmakers. RESOLVED that the Council of Michigan Foundations joins with the Northern California Grantmakers, Southern California Grantmakers and San Diego Grantmakers - the three California Regional Associations and the Council on Foundations in opposing California Assembly Bill 624 because this legislation: • ignores the commitment of many of our members to better reflect, represent, and serve all populations through the impact of the operations - governance, staffing, business practices and grantmaking- of organized philanthropy, • mandates the collection of data related to the diversity of our boards, staff and grantees that may be impossible to accurately collect, and • has the potential to both negatively impact the very diverse populations and communities it seeks to serve, and to slow-rather than grow - philanthropy and philanthropy's commitment to serve such populations. RESOLVED further that, in recognition of both CMF's Board approved Diversity and Inclusion Initiative and the appropriate balance between the voluntary decisions of individual grantmakers with the sector's responsibility to serve the common good and all of society, the Council of Michigan Foundations supports the call to action from the Council on Foundations that all of philanthropy join in a growing commitment to respond to the appropriate concerns about our lack of progress to date and our collective commitment to increasing our value for and leadership to the importance of diversity and inclusiveness in all that we do. Ms. Paine-McGovern shared that further amendments to the Michigan Nonprofit Corporation Act are moving through the Legislature and recommended that CMF take a position on HB 568 1 that addresses issues recommended by the Nonprofit Panel convened by Independent Sector. RESOLVED that CMF support HB 5681, sponsored jointly by Majority Floor Leader Steve Tobocman and Representative Bill Huizenga, to amend the Michigan Nonprofit Corporation Act to accomplish the following: • The board of directors of a nonprofit corporation would need at least three directors. Currently, the act requires "one or more" directors. Under the bill, an existing corporation would need to have at least three directors beginning 180 days after the bill's effective date. • A corporation that is a "charitable purpose corporation" could not provide loans to or guarantee an obligation of an officer or director of the corporation or �Board Mi nutes May 20, 2008 Page 4 a subsidiary, unless the officer or director is also a client of the corporation and the loan or guaranty is necessary to carry out the corporation's charitable purposes. • A charitable purpose corporation that is dissolved would have to provide notice of the dissolution to the attorney general within 60 days after the date of dissolution and could not dispose of any of its assets without written approval of the attorney general. Public Policy Committee Public Policy Fellow Jaclyn Miel-Uken introduced Dana Linnane, incoming Public Policy Fellow, who will begin work at CMF on June 23. Ms. Miel-Uken noted the Public Policy Committee met last month with a forecasting presentation by the Citizens Research Council. She encouraged all Trustees to attend the June 4 Foreclosure Briefing in Lansing. Karen Aldridge-Eason, Office of the Foundation Liaison (OFL), added that she is looking forward to having Dana work two days a week with the OFL. Rob Collier presented a request from the Michigan Association of United Ways that CMF support legislation to enable residents to donate to the United Way using their income tax form, similar to the check off now available for donations to the Children' s Trust Fund. Upon motion duly made, supported and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the Council of Michigan Foundations support HB 6025 & 6026 and SB 1287 that would provide Michigan residents with an income tax check off option to voluntarily donate to the United Way. On behalf of the co-chairs of the Public Policy Committee, Collier asked for support of the following resolution recognizing Jaclyn Miel-Uken for her service as Public Policy Fellow. RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees of the Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF) extends it appreciation to Jaclyn Miel-Uken for her dedicated service including: coordinating Public Policy Briefings with the Office of the Foundat ion Liaison; organizing groups of funders such as the Arts Affinity Group; managing special projects such as the EngAGEment Initiative with Grantmakers in Aging; working with policymakers both in Lansing a nd Washington on new opportunities for philanthropy such as the L3C bill; conducting research for new collaboratives such as the Access to Recreation Initiative; and working with the staff and the Board of Trustees of CMF to strengthen, promote and increase philant hropy in Michigan. Annual Conference Conference Co-Chairs Caroline Chambers and Rachel Mraz presented the great selection of sessions that will be offered with the emphasis on diversity. Vicki Rosenberg noted the programm ing has been aligned in accordance with past suggestions. This year's theme is Achieving Michigan 's Transformation. Programming modifications include a later start on Sunday October 12 with a later end time on Tuesday, October 14. The 1-clickers will be back for �Board Minutes May 20,2008 Page 5 the town hall meeting. Trustees are encouraged to refer sponsorship opportunities to Dave Lindberg. Rob Collier introduced the proposed overlap/collaboration with Independent Sector's (IS) 2009 Annual Conference in Detroit on November 4-6. IS and CMF staff are recommending that the CMF Conference start first with a day of overlap on Wednesday, November 4 through Thursday lunch on November 5. Upon motion duly made, supported and unanimously approved, it was RESOLVED that the 2009 Annual Conference ofCMF be scheduled for Tuesday afternoon, November 3 through Thursday afternoon, November 5 in Detroit with joint programming with Independent Sector on Wednesday afternoon, November 4 through Thursday afternoon, November 5. Executive Session Chair Sieger excused all CMF staff from the room for a closed Executive Session to discuss the results of the annual performance review of the CMF President. President's Report Susan Howbert noted they have added overflow hotels for the Family Foundation Retreat June 13 - 15 on Mackinac Island. The first ever geocashing team event will be held as well as a boat cruise under the Mackinaw bridge with Tom Kelly from the Inland Seas. Ms. Howbert reported Trustee Dave Sebastian hosted a Be Ready By Five meeting at the Grand Rapids Children's Museum. Mike Goorhouse, Program Assistant for Youth Philanthropy introduced Surabhi Pandit, the new Mawby intern. She is a junior at the University of Michigan, past member of the MCFYP Board and fanner YACer from the Southfield Community Foundation. Vicki Rosenberg noted the Logic Model on Diversity & Inclusion included in the Board Materials. Jeri Fischer reported the winners of the Russell G. Mawby Award- Ronda Stryker & Bill Johnston and the Community Foundation Philanthropy Award winner is Walter North. Both awards will be presented as part of the Governor's Service Awards on June 19, 2008. Adjournment There being no further business to come before the Board, Chair Sieger adjourned the meeting at 4:15p.m. Diana R. Sieger, Chairperson Robert S. Collier, President � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Previous-Board-Minutes Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book previous board minutes Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book previous board minutes. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50748 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/8b24b4d2f2688c786243b5ce621934ef.pdf 97309c7f12c68851ac2a579455ff7717 PDF Text Text CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. October 3, 2008 Memo to: Diana Sieger, Chairperson and Members of the Board ofTrustees From: Rob Collier, President Re: President's Report This Report highlights activities since the May Board Meeting by key goal and strategy. In preparing this summary I am reminded of the global reach CMF has thanks to your support and the support of key members. Staff news follows the summary along with a special update on the Diversity and Inclusion Initiative. I. ADVOCACY STRATEGY- To advocate for goals in Legislative Statement supporting a legislative and regulatory environment conducive to philanthropy Activities under this Goal are included in the Government Relations Committee Report II. EDUCATE STRATEGY- To provide programs, resources and technical assistance In addition to the many activities highlighted in the Public Policy Report, the following are noted: May 14- Be Ready by Five-Family Foundations Early Childhood Initiative Fifteen "Be Ready by Five" members met on May 14 at the Frey Foundation in Grand Rapids. The meeting included: a site visit to the Grand Rapids Children's Museum to learn about the "Come on Over" Emmy winning, locally-produced children's television show, discussion with Liz Goodenough, creator/producer of the documentary film " Where Do the Children Play?" on how to catalyze conversations between early childhood and environmental funders in their local communities and across Michigan, and a presentation on the Kent County Medical Home Initiative by Maureen Kirkwood, the project manager. June 12 - Family Philanthropy Teleconference- Family Foundations and Advocacy: Making Your Grant Dollars Go Further Abby Levine, Foundation Advocacy Counsel for the Alliance for Justice, defined advocacy, why it is important, and how fami ly foundations can fund and engage in advocacy in order to create systemic change. June 13 - 15 - Tenth Annual Family Foundations Retreat, Mackinac Island Over 170 adults and youth ages 3 to 95, representing 27 Michigan family foundations, gathered on the Island for the biggest and best ever Retreat. Highlights included: leaming new ways to craft and share fam ily stories to benefit all generations, experiencing the Great Lakes with a educational cruise led by Captain Tom Kelly from the Inland Seas and Helen Taylor from the Nature Conservancy, sharing �President's Report October 3, 2008 Page 2 foundation strategies and vision by answering questions strategically placed around the Island for the Geocaching Philanthropy Hunt done on bicycle and by horse carriage, and decorating the spectacular Family Philanthropy Float and riding in the Lilac Festival Grand Parade, the largest horse hitch parade in the world! June 9, 11& 20: Four Connecting Points Webinar with Andy Goodman Andy Goodman, a nationally known expert on communications, led the first in a series of three Webinars CMF is offering in partnership with the Donors Forum (Illinois), Indiana Grantmakers Alliance and the Communications Network. Twenty participants were introduced to the basics of strategic communications through this highly rated two-part webinar workshop. June 26- Institutionalizing Deep Diversity & Gender Equity Workshop As part of Transforming Michigan Philanthropy Through Diversity and Inclusion, CMF hosted a workshop on deep diversity and gender equity in grantmaking with Diversity in Philanthropy Project (DPP) consulting team member, Mary Ellen Capek, author of the prize-winning book Deep Diversity and Gender Equity in Grantmaking. Eleven members attended this highly engaging workshop which covered: an introduction to what "deep diversity" means, what it looks like in a foundation context, how it can increase the effectiveness and impact of your grantmaking and what resources are available to help you achieve your goals as well as a facilitated discussion among participants about their foundations' efforts- both successful and unsuccessful- to become more diverse and inclusive. July 9- Cultural Competency Institute for Grantrnakers Ten members attended this one-day, intensive workshop on cultural competency for grantmakers cosponsored by CMF and the Alliance for Nonprofit Management on July 9 as part of ANM's lOth anniversary national conference at the Hyatt Regency in Dearborn. Learning objectives were to increase capacity to think critically about the cultural dynamics at play in grantmaking and grantseeking; gain tools and skills for engaging more effectively historically underresourced cultural groups; and increase capacity to assess and influence institutional practices July 10 - Family Philanthropy Teleconference- Passing the Baton: Generations Sharing Leadership Alice Buhl, Director of Philanthropic Services, Lansberg, Gersick & Associates, discussed succession issues for the senior generation of foundation trustees and offered options for shared, multi-generational leadership. August 14 - Family Philanthropy Teleconference- Multi-Generational Philanthropy: Supporting the Next Generation of Philanthropists Nathan Dungan, Founder and President, Share Save Spend, led a conversation on how to encourage philanthropy in the next generation and outlined w ays families can teach the skills that will help young people become successful philanthropists. September 2. 9 & 17 - Deciding on Design Webinar w ith Andy Goodman Fifteen foundations staff from across the country, including three CMF members, participate in a threepart W ebinar series led by Andy Goodman in the second of three such workshops CMF is hosting in partnership with Donors Forum (Illinois), Indiana Grantmakers Alliance and the Communications Network. The course objective was to prepare those without design training make informed and effective choices regarding the use of graphic design to convey important messages to key audiences. This second Goodman webinar series again earned high praise. To accommodate registrant needs, CMF added an independent study option which allowed those interested in participating yet unable to attend all session times to access the recorded webinar at a time of their preference, submit their homework to �President's Report October 3, 2008 Page 3 Andy by a deadline. These Webinars have been an important test for what we expect will become a more common delivery mode for a variety of CMF programming. September 4 - Family Philanthropy Teleconference- Executive Transitions: Helping Your Grantees Through Leadership Changes Patrick Corvington, Annie E. Casey Foundation, and Tim Wolfred, CompassPoint Nonprofit Services, shared strategies for how foundations, small or large, can support grantees during executive succession planning and transition. September 9 and 18 IRS 2008 Forn1 990 Conference Calls Plante Moran highlighted key sections of the form that have changed from the 2007 version along with prov iding guidance on policies and procedures foundations should review to make sure they will be in compliance with the governance questions included in the new form. September 16 - Detroit Area Grantmakers - Friendly Funding Practices for Unfriendly Times Seventy grantmakers gathered to hear Clara Miller, president and CEO, Nonprofit Finance Fund, present methods funders can use to help strengthen and protect the nonprofit community during periods of economic downturn. Ms. Miller's presentation focused on nationally-accepted best practices that encourage both fiscally and socially responsible solutions to Michigan's economic woes. October 1 - How Grantmakers Learn Fifteen highly experienced grantmakers joined CMF and Jan Jaffe, project leader GrantCraft, a project of the Ford Foundation, for the fourth session held w ith CMF members to inform a future guide in the GrantCraft series. We are grateful to trustee Carol Goss and her staff at The Skillman Foundation for hosting this event. CMF is working with GrantCraft staff on the development of a strategic partnership through which our members will have early notice of new guides, opportunities to contribute to their content through onsite events such as How Grantmakers Learn, online surveys and other electronic means. YAC Fall Regional Trainings This fall, Mike Goorhouse and his MCFYP Committee will be conducting 12 regional trainings throughout the state of MI. These trainings provide orientation fo r new members, allow experienced members to receive focused training on complicated issues, and facilitate dialogue amongst advisors. Over 175 Y AC members and advisors from 19 different YACs have participated in the first 6 trainings which have already taken place. Upcoming Events November 20 - A Roundtable Discussion on General Operating Support Kathleen Enright, president & CEO, Grantmakers for Effective Organizations (GEO) will return to Michigan on Nov. 20 to lead a present the latest research findings on general operating support and to lead a roundtable discussion with CMF members on the pros and cons of such support. We are looking forward to welcoming Kathleen back to Michigan for her third roundtable with our members. December 8- 10 - Essential Skills and Strategies for New Grantmakers (ESS)- 2008 Institute Karen Aldridge-Eason, foundation liaison; Dave Egner, president, Hudson-Webber Foundation, chair, CMF Public Policy Committee and CMF Trustee; and Tonya Allen, vice president of program, The Skillman Foundation have agreed to serve as lead faculty for the 2008 delivery of Essential Skills and �President's Report October 3, 2008 Page4 Strategies for New Grantmakers, the standard national orientation for those new to foundation staff or board roles. ESS was developed through a partnership between the Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers and the Council on Foundations with leadership from CMF and Grantmakers of Western Pennsylvania. Now being used across the country, this is CMF's second offering of the program. Judie Donaldson, a co-author of the program with CMF Vice President Vicki Rosenberg, will serve as lead facilitators. January 19-20- Second Annual Heart ofthe Philanthropist Series Alumni Reunion Alumni of the two-year Heart of the Philanthropist Retreat Series hosted by CMF and the Fetzer Institute from 2004-2006, will come together at Gilchrist, a Fetzer Institute retreat center, to continue a self-guided reflection of the connection between their professional roles in philanthropy and their personal values. The first reunion held in 2008 has generated an upcoming article and an anticipated breakfast roundtable at the 36111 annual conference to share the experience and identify other CMF members interested in joining alumni for annual convenings. March 2-4, 2009- Symposium on Becoming a Diverse and Inclusive Foundation Teams from up to 20 CMF member foundation selected to participate in our first diversity and inclusion Community of Practice, leaders from the Diversity in Philanthropy Project consulting team, CMF trustees, members of the Governance Committee and Advisory Committee for Transfonning Michigan Philanthropy, CMF staff and select national guests will come together for a deep exploration of diversity and inclusive practice in foundations. The program wi ll be informed by the specific aspirations, needs and interests of participants. The Symposium is being co-developed and co-hosted by CMF and its partner, The Diversity in Philanthropy Project. Please save the dates and join us! Spring 2009- Web 2.0 and Digital Media Programming A working group of CMF members who lead communications, digital media and information technology is working with Kathy Ginocchio, CMF director of technology and Vicki Rosenberg on a series of three workshops Communications Network-Michigan will offer in 2009 on Web 2.0 and Digital Media. The first will focus on the connection between Web 2.0 and digital media for communications and IT staff; the second for communications and program staff; and the third on communications and grants management staff. The working group includes Dianne Price, director of public affairs, W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Mitch Hurst, team leader-new media, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, Scott Robinson, media manager, W.K. Kellogg Foundation, Gavin Clabaugh vice president information services, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation and Cynthia Shaw, communications director, The Kresge Foundation. III. INCREASE STRATEGY - To provide programs, resources and technical assistance to build the capacity of community foundations June 27-29,2008 Youth Grantmakers Summer Leadership Conference More than 225 youth grantmakers and advisors representing 37 YACs from Michigan and 8 YACs from around the country gathered for a weekend to discuss issues surrounding youth philanthropy at the University of Michigan. By learning from each others' experiences, and creating new memories each day, participants were able to engage in conversations about the amazing things they do and the challenges they face. This year's theme, "I Am Only One: One Individual, One Community, One Vision," was reflected through each day' s programming. The sessions allowed participants to strengthen individual leadership skills as well as gain insights on teamwork and community building. One of the �President's Report October 3, 2008 Page 5 highlights was the "One Community" aspect of the conference where YACers participated in Box City, a community building activity. Given a few guidelines, tons of random materials, and the opportunity to use creativity to the maximum capacity, participants were asked to plan and build the ideal city. In addition, the following new youth and adult members were added to the Michigan Community Foundations Youth Project Committee (MCFYP) a standing committee of CMF: Added to class of2010: • Madelynne Wager- Senior, Greenville Area Community Foundation • Colleen Knight - Advisor, Branch County Community Foundation Class of 20 11 : • Christian Birky- Senior, Allegan County Community Foundation • Bryan Lewis- Senior, Southfield Community Foundation • Kyle Musolf- Freshman, Lenawee Community Foundation • Mackenzie Price- Junior, Hillsdale Community Foundation • Scott Dane- Advisor, Capital Region Community Foundation IV. LEAD STRATEGY- To educate members through programs and resources The Public Policy Report previously referred to and earlier in the Board Agenda covers many of these activities. A special update on the Transforming Michigan through Diversity and Inclusion Initiative is included as Attachment A. In addition, it is valuable to note that CMF's role in collaborative responses to issues has been supported by the following special grant support since the May Board Meeting. • 2008 EngAGEment Matching Grant - $5,000 from Grantmakers in Aging for 1 year beginning 6/30/08 • Office ofthe Foundation Liaison- Phase Ill- $190,000 from 3 Funders for 3 years beginning 10/ 1/08 • Land Use Funders Group - 9 Funders $18,500 for 2009 event • Nonprofit Council for Charitable Trusts to the Office of the Attorney General- $70,000 from the Herbert H. & Grace A. Dow Foundation for 2 years beginning 6/30/08 • Annual Meeting of the Michigan Women & Girls Affinity Group- $7,500 from the Ceres Trust for the May 2008 event STRATEGY - To contribute to national and global dialogues on advancing community philanthropy Donnell Mersereau, Director, Community Foundations, and Executive Director ofMCFV, traveled to Europe to participate in two Transatlantic Community Foundations Network (TCFN) events and to provide consulting services to TCFN member community foundation staff and trustees. The first TCFN Peer Exchange in Prague focused on Bequests as a long-term asset development strategy and was hosted by the Community Foundation Euroregion Labe (Czech Republic) in partnership with Presov Community Foundation (Slovakia). The 24 participants from nine countries explored how community foundations can use bequests to develop assets, especially in environments where there is �President's Report October 3, 2008 Page 6 scant understanding of the idea of a philanthropic bequest. As part of the social program, participants enjoyed a reception at the residence of the Ambassador of the United States, Richard W. Graber, who engaged in an in-depth conversation about the role of community foundations locally and internationally. The second TCFN event- the Berlin Milestone Meeting-marked the closing ofTCFN Phase III and the beginning of a transition period that will result in the transfer of the network to Community Foundations of Canada (CFC). The evolving transnational dimension of community foundation activities and its potential for the future development of organized philanthropy was the cross-cutting theme for the conference. The new TCFN book "Local Mission- Global Vision. Community Foundations in the 21 st Century" was premiered at the conference and Lucy Bernholz, Blueprint Research and Design, and contributor to the book, was a keynote speaker. Ms. Mersereau received a special recognition at the conference for her 9 years of participation as a TCFN Ambassador, working group leader, community foundation consultant, on-site host to TCFN members visiting Michigan, and network member. Ms. Mersereau consulting itinerary included working with the staff and trustees of the Community Foundation for Ireland, YouthBank staff of the Community Foundation for Northern Ireland, and the 5 largest and oldest Gernmn community foundations on issues of growth and transitional roles of boards and staff. IV. NETWORK STRATEGY- To provide programs and resources linking grantmakers and grantmakers with grantseekers CMF's major networking activity, the Annual Conference, is highlighted in an action item earlier in the Agenda. CMF provided staff support to the annual Michigan Nonprofit Day on September 24 which featured 200 nonprofits and a number of CMF members as participants. MOU with National Communications Network This fall, CMF finalized a Memorandum of Agreement with the Communications Network to guide the work we will do together through the Communications Network-Michigan, the first state affiliate of the Network. VI. PROMOTE STRATEGY - Provide leadership for coordinated regional/national communications on the sector Philanthropy 3D/Michigan & Midwest- Update In January 2008, CMF received a $75,000 grant from The David & Lucille Packard Foundation to design and pilot Philanthropy 3D/Michigan whose goal isfor influential leaders in Michigan to appreciate and seek partnerships with foundations to improve the quality of life in Michigan. The Forum of Regional Associations ofGrantmakers (Forum) also provided a grant of$20,000 to CMF to test the 3D model in a small and mid-sized regional association (Donors Forum of Wisconsin and Indiana Grantmakers Alliance) to inform a final model and tools that can be used by regional associations across the U.S. �President's Report October 3, 2008 Page 7 • A May 1 meeting of senior communications executives from CMF member foundations. The meeting generated a high level of interest in participating in the p ilot which is designed to coordinate the development of common messages about the transformational value Michigan foundations provide to solving priority needs in our state. For purposes of this pilot, the priority need is "increasing Michigan's economic competitiveness." Next steps infonned by the May 1 meeting are as follows : • • • • Interviews of21 trustees ofCMF member foundations and 44 leaders from Michigan 's public, private, nonprofit and higher education sectors indentified by those trustees to understand their perceptions of how foundations are "increasing Michigan's economic competitiveness." Interviews will be conducted by the 3D evaluation team from the Community Research Institute (CRI), Johnson Center for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Management, Grand Valley State University. Data collection and interviews of CEOs and communications directors of member foundations engaged in strategic grantmaking (i.e., those that convene key stakeholders, advocate for public policy reforms and collaborate or partner with other foundations and public, private and nonprofits to achieve their grantmaking goals) in the Public Policy Committee and Office of the Fou ndation Liaison priority areas, i.e. healthcare, K-16 education, land use, corrections, economic development/workforce development. Audit of messages being used by member foundations (discussed above) in communications with trustees and external audiences about their work to "increase M ichigan's economic competitiveness" Development of common messages about the value and impact of Michigan foundations for use in CMF and member communications Design of a strategic plan for CMF's first "State of Philanthropy Report" which will launch the new message platform on the value and impact of Michigan foundations collectively. The report will be one of the major products of the 3D project. Michigan Philanthropy Oral History Project The 24 full digital recordings of member stories captured through the Michigan Philanthropy Oral History Project will be launched this fall as ;~ part of the Johnson Center online digital archives in the Grand Valley n 0 State University library. The recordings will be available to scholars, IO~AL H I S TO R Y PROJECT 1 students and others and a third round of recordings is scheduled for the end of October 2008. Plans are also underway to review this next set of recordings with Tamar Charney of Michigan Radio for additional broadcast opportunities similar to fall 2007. M~t,( HW/-. ~~~G A Nl h i I a n t h r py STRATEGY- Publish articles, reports and studies As noted in the Government Relations Report, CMF commissioned Cambridge Associates with support from the C.S. Mott Foundation to complete an analysis of the excise tax on private foundations that was released in early September. In partnership with the Michigan Nonprofit Association, CMF is co-producing this fall the third Economic Impact of the Nonprofi t Sector Report, prepared by Public Sector Consultants STRATEGY - Provide financial support for high profile events �President's Report October 3, 2008 Page 8 As noted earlier, CMF provided financial as well as staff support for Nonprofit Day in Lansing on September 24. CMF is again providing financial support for the Annual West Michigan Philanthropy Day on November 6, 2008 which this year is recognizing CMF member the Wege Foundation. CMF has also donated save the date postcards featuring the Detroit Institute of Arts for the November 46, 2009 Independent Sector Annual Conference taking place in Detroit. STRATEGY - Engage in media relations The Office of the Foundation Liaison was mentioned in an August 18, Washington Post article titled Some Nonprofits Push for Increased Federal Involvement. CMF was mentioned in a September 22, article in the Grand Rapids Business Journal titled Community Foundations guard nearly $1 billion. Staff News Grantmakers for Education Convening on Peer Learning Networks Vicki Rosenberg participated in an invitational convening hosted by Grantmakers for Education (GFE) in Minneapolis in May that examined lessons learned about effective funder networks. Kresge Foundation Program Officer Wendy Lewis Jackson joined Vicki and other regional association and foundation representatives to share stories and discuss case studies. The event was designed to inform GFE's strategic plan for working more closely with regional associations and other infrastructure organizations. WINGS Peer Learning Event Vicki Rosenberg participated in an intensive three-day training program on Emergent Learning Mapping (ELM) in September sponsored by the Worldwide Initiatives for Grantmaker Support (WINGS). ELM is a process designed to help diverse stakeholders develop theories of change and action plans for solving common problems. CMF plans to employ the ELM process at the Symposium on Diverse & Inclusion Foundations it is co-sponsoring with the Diversity in Philanthropy Project on March 2-4, 2009. Forum of Regional Associations (Forum)/Council on Foundations (COF) Working Group on Grantmaker Education Vicki Rosenberg will serve on a new Forum/COF working group charged with developing recommendations for collaborative work the two organizations can undertake together. CMF member and COF Trustee, C. David Campbell, president, McGregor Fund w ill represent COF. The first meeting will be October 21 , 2008. Communications Network Vicki Rosenberg presented the Philanthropy 3D/Michigan project, a regional pilot of the Philanthropy Awareness Project funded by the David & Lucille Packard Foundation, at the Communications Network Annual Conference in Chicago on Sept. 25. Her co-presenters were Mark Sedway, project director, PAl and Eric Brown, communications director, Will iam & Flora Hewlett Foundation. �President's Report October 3, 2008 Page 9 Forum Summer Conference Vicki Rosenberg presented CMF's work on Transforming Michigan Philanthropy Through Diversity and Inclusion in a plenary session at the Forum Summer Conference. Her co-presenters were Anna Pond, consultant, Diversity in Philanthropy Project and Renee Branch, director of inclusive practice, Council on Foundations. Kellogg Action Lab Convening on Communications Rebecca Noricks, CMF communications manager, participated in a Kellogg Action Lab Convening on communications on August 7-8, 2008. Topics covered included strategic communications planning and using Web 2.0 and digital media to reach target audiences more effectively. 2"d Annual ARNOVA-COF Conference on Diversity & Foundation Effectiveness- Oct. 15-17, 2008 Vicki Rosenberg will participate in this invitational meeting in a series designed to explore research topics related to diversity in philanthropy. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Presidents-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book presidents report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book presidents report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50747 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d2cdb0e5e5407f32e5fbed3c2cbc12b0.pdf ba39712218b363bd2ab5d8b94c44fd3a PDF Text Text CMF Councilof Michi an Fou n:fat ions Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. Date: October 1, 2008 Memo To: Diana Sieger, Chairperson, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: John Colina, Chair, Membership Committee, Rob Collier, President, & Jeri Fischer, Membership & Special Projects Director Re: Membership Report The following resolution is presented for action. RESOLVED that the following grantmakers be approved for membership: Doyle Fund for Nonprofit Workforce Capacity Building, Detroit GarlandS. Doyle, founder • Donor adv ised fund at the Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan, created in 2008. Felpausch Foundation, Battle Creek Kim Brubaker, trustee • Family foundation created in 2007 with assets of $ 1.9 million and grantmaking of $42,500. The Jones Family Foundation, Belleville Tammi Carr, director • Family foundation created in 2007 by Wayne D. Jones and Shelly Jones, not yet funded. Center for Arab-American Philanthropy, Dearborn Jamie Kim, director • National public charity that pools the charitable resources of Arab-Americans to foster giving and civic engagement in American society. ElMa Private Foundation, Delaware Tim May/eben, president • Private family foundation through FoundationSource with assets of $ 1 million and grantmaking in Ann Arbor I. Activity Summary for period April 1, 2008 through October 1, 2008 Memberships at 4/ 1/08 New Mem bers Dropped Membership at 1011 /08 Renewals# Renewal % Revenue (renewals & new) Additional # Additional $ 397 5 25 377 3 11 83% $ 960,555 25 $ 10,260 �Membership Report October I, 2008 Page 2 II. Summary of current membershiQ Private: Family Foundations Independent Foundations Community: Foundations Affiliates Donor-Advised Funds Corporate: Foundations Giving Programs Public: Foundations Donor-Advised Funds Out-of-State Associate: Private Foundations Community Foundation Totals: 212 158 54 96 55 33 8 41 24 17 19 18 9 8 1 377 377 III. DroQQed from MembershiQ The majority of these foundations are small family foundations that have not responded to repeated efforts to contact them. American Axle and Manufacturing (no corporate giving at this time) T he Campbell F und (member of Association of Small Foundation - no interest expressed) Benn and Kathleen Gilmore Foundation (have not endowed foundation) Howard Miller Foundation (no interest expressed) William and Sarah Seidman Foundation (out of state AZ, no participation) Berrien C ommunity Foundation (have chosen to join COF) Verizon (no interest at this time due to the economy) Citizens Bank-Flint (no interest at this time due to the economy) Detroit Lions (no interest at this time due to the economy) T he Ruffner Foundation (no interest) Peter Mason Charitable Foundation (no interest) Shubeck Mansour Foundation (no interest) Bingham Family Foundation (no interest) T he Summers Foundation (no interest) Henry C. and Audrienne M urray Foundation (no interest) Klopcic Family Foundation (no interest) T he Samaritan Foundation (no interest) Amy Foundation (no interest) W.B. McCardell Family Foundation (no interest) River City Foundation (no interest) Amherst and Janeth T urner Foundation (no interest) Amos Nordman Charitable Trust (no interest) Samuel Higby Camp Foundation (no interest) The John and Elizabeth Whiteley Foundation (no interest) Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan (corporate foundation member already, second membership not needed) � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Membership-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book membership report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book membership report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50746 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/21b3a54f9477c7441f5bddb5bfa20548.pdf 0fed3ff2731901a3fdff8d5067dbb584 PDF Text Text Council of Michi an CMF Foun~ations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. October 3, 2008 To: Diana Sieger, Chairperson and Members of the Board ofTrustees From: Andrea Cole and Carol Paine McGovern, Co-Chairs Government Relations Committee cc: Rob Collier, President Re: Report of the Government Relations Committee The Annual Meeting ofthe Government Relations Committee was held on September 17 with participation by 12 of the 28 members either by phone or in person. All participants in Foundations on the Hill are invited to participate in the Government Relations Committee. The following report with recommended action is presented for your consideration. I. Update of Legislative Goals Statement RESOLVED that the Legislative Goals Statement, as attached, be adopted for 2008-09 as recommended by the Government Relations Committee. B ackground - National and State Legislative and Regulatory Issues Mr. Collier reviewed the proposed Action Goals for National Legislative Issues: simplification of the excise tax on private foundations to a revenue neutral number; extension of the IRA Charitable Rollover; reinstatement of the federal state estate tax credit; and exemption from UBIT when investing in securities that involve debt. He noted that extension of the IRA Charitable Rollover may still occur in 2008 and shared the conclusions of Cambridge Associates in doing their analysis of a revenue neutral number on the Excise Tax. He then reviewed the proposed Action Goals for State Legislative Issues: monitoring the community foundation tax credit; updating the Unifonn Management of Institutional Funds Act (UMIFA); amending the LLC Act to create the Low-profit limited liability corporation (L3C), and monitoring the activ ities of the Greenlining Institute in possibly introducing legislation in Michigan. Duane Tarnacki from Clark Hill, CMF legal counsel, commented on the L3C legislation and the two bills passed this year to update the Michigan Nonprofit Corporation Act. II. Update from Office of the Foundation Liaison and Public Policy Fellow Karen Aldridge-Eason and Maura Dewan summarized the activities of the Office of the Foundation Liaison in Lansing with the Governor' s Office and State Departments as noted in the attachment to the President's Report and Dana Linnane commented on the Public Policy Activities summarized in the Public Policy Report also included in the Board of Trustees materials. �Government Relations Report October 2008 Page 2 III. Other Issues and 2009 Foundations on the Hill Mr. Collier shared information from three national partners. First, the Council on Foundations has noted the September 8 Roundtable discussion on College Endowments held by Senator Grassley and Representative Welch. This issue is being monitored because of the likely impact it will have on community foundations if a required payout is introduced. Second, the Alliance for Charitable Reform has noted the continued efforts by the Greenlining Institute to have more states introduce legislation dealing with required reporting on diversity by foundations and their grantees and vendors. He noted that the Board of CMF took a position on this issue at its May Meeting and it has been added to our state goals. Third, the Daily Policy Digest from Independent Sector highlighted a speech by the tax legislative counsel to Senator Grassley in which she stated that the Senator intends to make a "hard push" to review all of the charitable provisions in the tax code as Congress attempts to accomplish tax refonn. Co-Chair Andrea Cole noted the tone of the article from The Chronicle of Philanthropy supports this and recommended that all read "Paying it Forward and Back." Co-Chair Carol Paine-McGovern invited all to save the dates of March 24 & 25, 2009 for CMF's 31st annual trip to Washington to meet with members of our Congressional Delegation noting that this will be a vital year for tax policy. �CMF Council of M ichigan Founcfations Serving grontmakers. Advancing giving. 2008-09 Legislative Goals Statement The purpose of the Government Relations Cmmnittee of the Council of Michigan Foundations is to seek support for legislative and regulatory changes at both the state and national levels that will help to strengthen, promote and increase foundation and corporate philanthropy. The CMF Board of Trustees approved the initial Legislative Statement on March 1, 1979. Revised statements were approved September 19, 1980; January 27, 1982; May 10, 1983; June 14, 1985; April 12, 1988; February 25, 1992; November 4, 1992; November 8, 1995; October 30, 1996; March 13, 1997; November 4, 1998; October 14, 1999; October 2, 2000, October 2, 2001, September 29, 2002, November 10, 2003, November 3, 2004, October 10,2005, October 17,2006, October 22,2007, and October 13, 2008. Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................page 1 National Goals Accomplished•...•.. ....•......•........•.......page 2 State Goals Accomplished ........................................page 3 National Legislative Issues- Action Goals ................... page 3 National Legislative Issues- Ongoing Goals.. ............•.. page 6 State Legislative Issues- Action Goals ....................... page 11 State Legislative Issues- Ongoing Goals ....................page 13 I. INTRODUCTION Foundation and corporate giving has long been a unique part of American society, supported by appropriate federal and state legislation and regulations. While there have been reforms at both levels of government to encourage giving, there have also been provisions in past legislation, such as the 1969 Tax Act, and regulations that serve as disincentives for the creation of new foundations, as well as discourage charitable donations to existing foundations. Because the mission of CMF is to strengthen, promote and increase philanthropy in Michigan, the Board of Trustees has adopted as one of six operating goals - to advocate *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page I �for a legislative and regulatory government conducive to philanthropy. In 1977, the Members ofCMF directed the Board ofTrustees to develop a public information program that would support and encourage Michigan foundation philanthropy and include communication with public policymakers. A Government Relations Committee, representing foundation and corporate giving program members, was established to implement the program and has continued to represent CMF Members on their legislative interests and priorities. In 1978, CMF began an annual activity of taking a group of foundation representatives to meet with each member of the Michigan Congressional Delegation in Washington. Known as Foundations on the Hill, 2008 marked the 301h year of this activity now shared by other regional associations of grantmakers across the country in partnership with the Council on Foundations and the Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers. In addition to these organizations, CMF works with the Michigan Nonprofit Association, Independent Sector, and other nonprofit organizations to enhance the understanding of public policymakers at the federal and state level about philanthropy and to bring about appropriate legislative changes in laws and regulations. In part because CMF and its community foundations have been successful in making the community foundation tax credit permanent in the state tax code, CMF retains the firm Public Affairs Associates to assist in Lansing with its educational efforts with state policymakers. As a result of these efforts by CMF and others, the following goals have been accomplished. II. NATIONAL GOALS ACCOMPLISHED • • • • • • • • • • • Reduction of mandatory pay-out requirement for private foundations to 5% Excise Tax on private foundations reduced from 4% to 2%, and in some cases 1% Terminated .65 limit on grant administrative expenses for private foundations Fair regulations on private foundation lobbying issued Full deductibility of gifts to private foundations of publicly-traded stock made permanent Gain portion of gifts of appreciated property not subject to the alternative minimum tax Affidavit process for simplifying private foundations grants to non-U.S. charities instituted Private & community foundations allowed to own S-Corporation stock Protected charitable gift annuities as attractive giving vehicle for donors Premiums paid for D&O liability insurance not treated as compensation for trustees Regulation passed indicating U.S . foundation grants to nonresident aliens would be taxed, depending on the place where the research or study takes place *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 2 �• • • • • • Community foundations permitted to administer pooled income fund Due date of first estimated private foundation tax payment on investment income changed to coincide with the due date of the Fonn 990-PF Generation-skipping transfer law pertinent to the predeceased parent exclusion, extended for charitable lead and remainder trusts Legislation passed eliminating Charitable Split Dollar Insurance Plans Estate tax phased out between 2002 and 2010 Legislation passed in 2006 providing for a two year pilot for 2006 and 2007 for a Charitable IRA provision and renewed in 2008 for the years 2008 and 2009. III. STATE GOALS ACCOMPLISHED • • • • • • • • • • State inheritance tax repealed Community foundation tax credit for individuals and businesses made permanent Definition of community foundation strengthened in tax code Tort liability of volunteers of nonprofit corporations limited Michigan Intangibles Tax repealed 501(c)(3) organizations allowed to have an insurable interest in the life of an individual who has given written consent Legislation (three separate bills) passed allowing gifts and bequests received by units of local government (cities, villages, counties, public libraries and schools), to be gifted to community foundations Nonprofit Corporation Act amended to allow youth ages 16 and 17 to serve on boards of nonprofit corporations with vote Legislation passed for distribution of $20 plus million in 2001-2003 tobacco settlement funds to state-certified community foundations for healthy youth and healthy seniors programs Nonprofit Corporation Act amended in 2008 in two bills - first to allow for electronic communication, and second to require a minimum number of three trustees, no loans to officers, and notification of the Attorney General on dissolution. IV. NATIONAL LEGISLATIVE ISSUES ACTION GOAL S 1. Goal: Support simplification of the excise tax on private foundations to a flat tax that is revenue neutral for the federal government. Explanation : The 1984 Tax Act allows the excise tax on investment income to be reduced from two to one percent if a foundation's payout for the year in question equals or exceeds an amount equal to the year's assets, times the average payout percentage for the five years, plus 1 percent of the foundation's net *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 3 �investment income. Private foundations are the only 50 1(c)(3) organizations that currently pay this federal tax. The current formula is difficult to administer and can limit charitable giving. While CMF has been advocating simplification of the tax to a flat one percent, as a result of the 2008 Foundations on the Hill, CMF was encouraged by members of the Michigan Congressional Delegation to have an outside firm complete an analysis of what a revenue neutral number would be for a flat excise tax. Cambridge Associates completed the analysis in September 2008 and recommends a revenue neutral number of 1.32%. This analysis has been shared with members of the Michigan Congressional Delegation as well as the Council on Foundations with a goal of attaching simplification to a tax bill in the remaining 2008 Congressional session if an expedited analysis by the Joint Committee on Taxation can be completed. If not, action in 2009 with the new Congress will be sought. 2. Goal: Pennit tax-free distribution from individual retirement accounts (IRAs) for charitable purposes. Explanation: It is proposed that direct gifts from an IRA to a charitable organization would not be taxed as income to the account-holder who has attained the age of 59 Y2 years of age, if the disbursement is made directly to either a qualified charity or a qualifying deferred giving plan. It is anticipated that such a law would increase contributions to many charitable organizations, including community foundations. This issue has continued to receive bi-partisan support in both the House and Senate. Michigan Representative Dave Camp and both Senator Levin and Senator Stabenow played key roles in the inclusion of the IRA Charitable Rollover in the final version of the Pension Bill signed into law by the President in August 2006. The provision allows individuals age 70 Y2 to make contributions of up to $100,000 tax free from IRAs to charitable organizations, except donor advised funds and private foundations, in both 2006 and 2007. CMF through its supporting organization, Midwest Community Foundations' Ventures, played a leading role in the development of the Charitable IRA Portfolio distributed in September 2006 to all community foundations nationwide that meet national standards for community foundations. CMF has promoted inclusion of the Donor Advised Fund, no cap, and an age of 591/2, in the IRA Rollover, as introduced in HR 1419 and SB 819 in 2007. However, due to the pay go rules in Congress, the initial results of the research by the National Planned giving Council on the IRA, and the ongoing investigation by Treasury into the use of Donor Advised Funds, the immediate priority is *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 4 �extension of the IRA Charitable Rollover Provision that expired in December 2007 with no changes in its terms. While legislation has been passed in both the House and Senate in favor of extending the Rollover Provision, it has been combined with a number of extenders stuck in a filibuster due to a difference in philosophy over the pay go rules of the House. The Extenders package was added to the Bailout package passed by the Senate on October 1 2008, and action is expected by the House on October 3, 2008. The IRA Charitable Rollover Provision will now be available through December 31, 2009. The Michigan Congressional Delegation remains supportive of extending the Provision. 3. Goal: Monitor the impact of estate tax legislation passed in 200 I on creation of new foundations and gifts to existing foundations and promote reinstatement of the federal state estate tax credit. Explanation: The "Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of2001" passed by the Congress and signed into law by the President in June 200 I, phases out the Estate Tax between 2002 and 2010. Full repeal however is only in effect for the year 2010. The estate tax then reverts, unless new legislation is passed, to the 2000 tax code status. President Bush has indicated that it is a priority to make repeal of the estate tax permanent. It is estimated by the Congressional Budget Office in a July 2004 Report titles Charitable Bequests and the Repeal of the Estate Tax, that full repeal of the estate tax would annually cost the nonprofit sector $17 billion in charitable bequests. Independent Sector (IS) supports a compromise of an exemption rate of $3.5 million for an individual and a 35% tax rate. At this rate it is believed that nearly all family fanns and family-owned businesses would be exempt from the estate tax. The estate tax would only apply to 0.3 percent of Americans as opposed to only 2 percent of estates today. The Congressional Budget Office further estimates in a July 2005 Report titled Effects ofthe Federal Estate Tax on Farms and Small Businesses, that the IS position would decrease charitable giving by about 3 percent or $7.4 billion as opposed to $17 billion with total repeal. While it is the position ofCMF to not support or oppose legislation that has a broad impact beyond the charitable field, 2009 is anticipated to be a major year for tax policy in the new Congress, CMF will monitor the potential impact on philanthropy of new legislation and future changes that might be made in the estate tax. *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. PageS �This goal is now tied to Goal 9 under State Legislative Issues - opposing reinstatement of a state inheritance tax. Michigan was receiving funds from the federal state estate tax credit that more than offset repeal of the state inheritance tax in 1993 - a CMF Goal. The federal credit has now been phased out, and a bill introduced in 2007 to reinstate a State Inheritance Tax not acted on because reinstatement w ill encourage residents to again transfer their place of residency to homes in Florida and other states. 4. Goal: Support legislation that allows tax-exempt entities to invest in securities and commodities that involve indebtedness w ithout being subject to unrelated business income tax. Explanation: Congressman Sander Levin introduced H.R. 3501 in 2007 to exempt tax-exempt entities from Unrelated Business Income Tax (UBIT) when investing in securities that involve debt. The original intent ofUBIT was to prevent nonprofits from competing against for-profit entities in a business that is not substantially related to its exempt purpose. Over the last twenty years, foundations and universities have invested in hedge funds and other alternative investments to increase their investment returns and reduce the volatility of their investment portfolio. Many times these investments involve leverage (debt) that would subject the foundation to UBIT but based on Private Letter Rulings from the IRS, foundations are able invest in this area through offshore corporations as limited partners and avoid UBIT. The key issue is tax-exempt institutions should not be taxed on passive leveraged investments . While the House added HR 3501 to the Extenders Package it passed in 2008, the Senate did not include HR 3501 in its Extenders Package that is still being debated in September 2008. This issue will need to be reintroduced in the new Congress in 2009. ONGOING GOALS 1. Goal: Maintain the private foundation payout rate at not more than 5 percent to protect the real value of foundations' grantmaking capability. Explanation: In order to preserve the "real" grantmaking capacity of a private foundation, it is important that all historical financial data be taken into consideration. History has shown that a portion of the annual return should be returned to principal. (Reilly/Skadden, University of Michigan Graduate School of Business Administration study sponsored by CMF, 1981- Private Foundations: The Payout Requirement and Its Effect on Investment and Spending Policies, and a DeMarche Associates, Inc. study "Spending Policies and Investment Planning for Foundations," 1995, sponsored by the Council on Foundations.) A CMF sponsored study, completed in May 2000 and updated in 2004 by Cambridge Associates, Inc. of the actual *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 6 �performance of a group of Michigan endowed private foundations, confirms the position of maintaining the payout rate at no more than 5 %. While efforts to increase the payout of private foundations to more than 5% seem to be quiet at this time, the Senate Finance Committee has held a hearing in September 2008 on the issue of university and college endowments which could result in legislation being introduced to mandate a payout for such endowments. All public charities holding endowments, including community foundations may be involved in such legislation. CMF has a position to support a collective payout rate of 5(!/o for the donor advised funds held by community foundations. 2. Goal: Change the limitation on gifts to a private foundation from 20 percent to 30 percent of AGI for gifts of appreciated property and from 30 percent to 50 percent of AGI for gifts of cash. Explanation: Under existing law, the amount deductible by an individual taxpayer for contributions to private non-operating foundations is computed as a percentage of the donor's contribution base (in most cases, his or her adjusted gross income). An individual may deduct only 20 percent of the gifts of appreciated property or 30 percent of gifts of cash. On the other hand, an individual taxpayer can deduct up to 50 percent of their contribution base for cash (and 30 percent for appreciated property) for gifts to public charities. 3. Goal: Increase the deduction allowed a taxpayer for a gift to a private foundation of certain capital gain property. Explanation: Individual taxpayers may deduct the full fair market value of a gift to a private foundation of appreciated property in the fonn of publicly-traded stock, if the gift is less than 10 percent ofthe outstanding stock of the company. However, in other cases, such as privately held stock, the amount of deduction continues to be limited to the donor's cost or basis in the stock if the gift is to a private non-operating foundation. The same gift to a public charity entitles the taxpayer to a full fair market value deduction. 4. Goal: Prevent further efforts to reduce the usefulness of the charitable deduction and repeal the three percent floor on itemized deductions. Explanation: In 1990, after initially considering a cap on all itemized deductions, Congress approved a three percent floor in deductions. This floor was scheduled to expire at the end of 1995, but in 1993 was made permanent. 5. Goal: Limit lineal descendants who are "disqualified persons" at the level of grandchildren. *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 7 �Explanation: In 1984, the law was amended to limit "disqualified persons" to substantial contributors to a foundation and their children, grandchildren, great grandchildren, and their spouses. The amendment provided that substantial contributors will no longer be considered "disqualified persons" if, over a ten-year period, they meet certain requirements to distance themselves from the foundation. However, there is still no logical rationale- - or examples of abuse- to justify the inclusion of lineal descendants beyond the level of grandchildren. 6. Goal: Modify the law to penn it the "out of corpus" requirement to be met by a foreign grantee if sufficient documentation is provided showing that the full amount of the grant was spent for the specified purposes within 12 months after the year the grant was made. Explanation: When making grants to some foreign charities, private foundations are required to treat them as private foundations. Any grant from a private foundation to another private foundation requires that the amount granted "flow through" the grantee and out as qualifying distributions that are made "out of corpus" by the end of the following year. The purpose for this rule is to prevent a foundation from avoiding the payout rule by having one private foundation give to another, who then simply adds the grant to its endowment (corpus), with charitable grantees receiving no benefit. In the foreign grant context, the grantee rarely has any endowment and totally misunderstands the concept of"out of corpus." 7. Goal: Secure passage of legislation providing a charitable deduction for nonitemizers. Explanation: Most taxpayers no longer file the long tax form that pennits itemized deductions; instead they file the short form that allows only a standard deduction. From 1983 to 1986 non-itemizers were permitted to take the standard deduction plus itemize charitable contributions within certain limits, but the deduction expired January 1, 1987. Because the Senate Fiscal Agency has evaluated the cost of the non-itemizer and deemed that it will cost the federal government more than it will generate in new charitable giving, efforts to attach this goal to legislation were dropped in 2007 and are not expected to be continued in 2008 or the new Congress in 2009. 8. Goal: Support reasonable limits on the degree to which foundations and charities can lobby or otherwise influence public policy decisions and oppose unreasonable limits that adversely affect grantmaking. *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 8 �Explanation : Continuous monitoring is essential to oppose unreasonable and unnecessary regulatory reporting burdens on both foundations and their grantees. Independent Sector (IS), on behalf of foundations and public charity nonprofits, has taken the position that 50l(c)(3) and 50l(c)(4) organizations should not be included in the definition of political committees. Political committees are prohibited from raising money from corporations (including nonprofit corporations) or unions or from using contributions in excess of$5,000 from an individual to pay for electioneering activities. Political committees must also disclose names of contributors in regular reports to the Federal Election Commission (FEC), and contributions to such committees are not tax-deductible. IS makes the following points: • • • 9. Current tax law already limits the lobbying and partisan political activities of these groups. The FEC should maintain its current, clear distinction between "express advocacy" communications (those that clearly call for a vote for or against a particular candidate or political party) and other nonpartisan communications. It should not adopt IRS standards for partisan advocacy, which were designed for a different regulatory and enforcement regime. Voter registration and get-out-the-vote activities should only be considered political expenditures if they are clearly tied to a candidate or party. Activities targeted to specific populations (e.g., women, African Americans, a particular neighborhood, members of a particular organization) should not be considered pol itical "expenditures" simply because those populations may be "more likely" to vote for a particular candidate or party. Goal: Support legislation to eliminate the classification of realized gains and income, derived from leveraged real estate investments by foundations, as unrelated business taxable income. Explanation: Foundations and nonprofit organizations are significant investors in the real estate market. However, income derived from leveraged real estate investments, owned directly or through partnerships, is currently taxed as unrelated business taxable income (UBTI). Private foundations should be treated in the same manner as educational organizations and qualified pension plans, which since 1980 have been exempt from the debt-financed property rules with respect to the acquisition of certain real property. 10. Goal: Avoid excessive regulations on corporate giving. Explanation : CMF supports public accountability, but not excessive regulation, which would require costly administration by corporations. CMF continues to *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 9 �monitor proposed legislation like the House version of the 2002 Corporate and Accounting: Accountability and Transparency Act that included three reporting provisions (all Board service by officers, directors, and significant fami ly members; all gifts of$10,000 or more; all transactions valued at $10,000 or more) that would have a negative impact on corporate philanthropy. There has been no similar legislation introduced since 2006 and none is expected in the 2008 Congressional session. 11. Goal: Support efforts to incorporate philanthropy as an objective of legislation providing financial resources to character education and other K -12 educational initiatives. Explanation: CMF was successful through the Learning to Give initiative in having the word "giving" added to the definition of character education in the 2002 Education Bill signed by President Bush. Learning to Give, now through its new affiliation with The League, is assisting when appropriate national partners, such as the Corporation for National and Community Service, in efforts to ensure that giving is incorporated in new character education programs and other appropriate federal initiatives. 12. Goal: Support legislation requiring a five percent payout for Donor Advised Funds. Explanation: In 2005 and 2006, staff of the Senate Finance Committee advocated for a required payout for Donor Advised Funds, defined simply as Funds at public charities that primarily make grants to charitable beneficiaries pursuant to advice provided by the donor. This proposed required payout is caused by concerns of members of Congress that some Donor Advised Funds administered by organizations such as the Fidelity Gift Fund never make a charitable distribution and that university and college endowment funds make less than a five percent payout while the cost of higher education continues to escalate for students. Because the five percent payout is recommended by both M ichigan and national standards for community foundations, CMF supports such legislation. The National Panel convened by IS at the request of the Senate Finance Committee has recommended this payout requirement for Donor Advised Funds in its final Report presented on June 22, 2005 to Senator Grassley, Chair of the Senate Finance Committee. A payout for Donor Advised Funds will be considered by the Department of Treasury in its study of Donor Advised Funds required in the Charitable Reform Section ofHR 4 - the Pension Bill, signed into law in August 2006. The results of this Study are expected to be released in late 2008. *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 10 �13. Goal: Support efforts to make the IRS fom1s 990 and 990PF more useful to the public, foundations, charities and regulators as prime sources of reliable information on the nonprofit sector. Explanation: The IRS is concluding efforts on a new Form 990 effective in 2009 which CMF has contributed to through work led by the Council on Foundations, Independent Sector, the Foundation Center, and the National Center on Charitable Statistics. A review of 30 990PF returns by CMF staff in January 2004 confirmed the problems filers are having with the current forms. The 2005 Report to the Senate Finance Committee by the National Panel convened by Independent Sector recommended that the Internal Revenue Service revise these forms. CMF is prepared to contribute to the 990PF update once the IRS begins work on it. 14. Goal: Support efforts to limit tax shelters in which charities receive little or no benefit. Explanation: The Senate Finance Committee has identified through Hearings held in 2004 and 2005, examples of tax shelters providing little benefit to charity. As a result Senator Grassley introduced S 993 in 2005 to place excise taxes on insurance contracts in which certain exempt organizations may hold an interest. This Bill received support from the Council on Foundations, Independent Sector and CMF. The issue of insurance contracts has been included in the Refonn Provisions ofHR 4 passed in 2006. V. STATE LEGISLATIVE ISSUES ACTION GOALS 1. Goal: To monitor administration of the permanent community foundation tax credits for individuals, fami lies and businesses and their relationship to current and proposed tax credits. Explanation: As a result of term limits CMF staff continually work with legislators to explain the tax credit and the role of community foundations in building permanent endowments. There is an on-going effort by other nonprofit sector groups such as hospitals, schools and community development corporations to obtain targeted tax credits for endowments without acknowledgement of the potential to meet their needs through the existing community foundation tax credit. In addition, CMF staff assists Treasury Department staff to insure that the re-certification process is working with certified community foundations that cover all 83 counties. *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 11 �The community foundation tax credit has been included in the new Michigan Business Tax (MBT) that took effect in 2008. However, a new credit for endowment gifts to K-12 education foundations has been added to the section of the MBT covering the community founda tions tax credit. E fforts continue to separate this new credit from the community foundation tax credit as part of additional legislation on the MBT. 2. Goal: To support legislation to replace the Uniform Management oflnstitutional Funds Act (UMIF A) with the Uniform Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act (UPMIFA), including language that UPMIFA does not affect a community foundation's ability to exercise its variance power. Explanation: Senate Bills 392 & 393 were introduced in 2007 to replace UMIFA, which governs how foundations manage their investments with UPMIFA as recommended by the National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws. The Council of the Probate and Estate Planning Section of the Michigan State Bar discussed this legislation in April 2007 and suggested two changes to the proposed legislation. a. Make it clear that this does not affect community foundations in trust fonn which are governed under other laws. b. This should not affect the community foundation's ability to exercise variance power. The key differences from UMIFA, include: • Elimination of"historic dollar value" rule • Gives primary consideration to donor intent • Notify Attorney General if plan to exercise variance power (see revision noted above). • Investments should be diversified. Efforts to move these Bills will continue in 2009. 3. Goal: Amend the State Limited Liability Company Act to create a "Low-profit Limited Liability Company" (L3C). The purpose of this new investment vehicle would be to generate modest profit while carrying on a business that serves a charitable purpose. Explanation: The L3C is a new concept: a special type of limited liability company created to enhance the flow of philanthropic investments and economic development activities such as creating jobs in economically depressed areas or supporting community revitalization. Vermont is the first state to adopt this legislation. The L3C has been adopted as a priority by the COF Public Policy Committee. *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 12 �In many cases before a private foundation can undertake a program-related investment, it must engage in a complicated analysis which often includes obtaining a private letter ruling from the IRS at considerable time and expense. The proposed state legislation would closely track the Internal Revenue Code requirements for a private foundation to make a program-related investment. Once the state legislation is enacted, the Council on Foundations believes it can approach the IRS and/or Congress to obtain appropriate federal recognition. The amendment to the LLC statute would require an L3C to engage only in business activities that significantly further a charitable purpose and that have only the incidental goal of producing income or capital appreciation. Given those restrictions, foundations could take an equity interest in or make grants or loans to L3Cs and have the distributions included in the 5% minimum distribution requirement. This legislation would also benefit community foundations and other public charities engaged in economic development by pennitting them to invest in a business that is structured primarily to accomplish a charitable goal. Senator Jason Allen has introduced SB 1445 and SB 1446 to amend the state's LLC Act to allow for creation of the L3C structure. The Senate Commerce Committee met in September 2008 to approve the two bills for consideration by the Senate. 4. Goal: To oppose efforts by the Greenlining Institute, as they did in California, to legislate at the state (or federal) level reporting requirements on diversity for foundations, their grantees and vendors. Explanation: California Assembly Bill 624 would require all foundations (30) in California with more than $250 million to provide annual documentation on the ethnic diversity of foundation trustees, staff, as well as grantees and vendors. While there has been widespread opposition to this Bill, it did pass the Assembly and is now awaiting action by two committees of the California Senate - one which will meet next week. Staff of the Greenlining Institute of Berkeley California, author of the legislation, has met with Congressman Rangle, Chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, to encourage introduction of this legislation at the federal level. The Institute has also indicated that it intends to have this legislation introduced in New York, Pennsylvania, Florida and Texas. As CMF Chairperson Diana Sieger wrote in her recent Memo to Members letter, we heard from Steve Gunderson at the Council on Foundations that our field must either lead or be legislated. Through our Diversity and Inclusion Initiative CMF has taken the position to be a leader. At the recent COF Summit, Congressman Becerra of California stated that Congress needs to be able to justify the $32 billion earmark that is gives for gifts to foundations. While not endorsing this California Bill, he made it clear that *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 13 �diversity is also a matter of class and he along with others in Congress want to know how foundations are helping the neediest. Therefore at the May 22, 2008 CMF Board Meeting the following two resolutions were approved. RESOLVED that the Council of Michigan Foundations joins with the Northern California Grantmakers, Southern California Grantmakers and San Diego Grantmakers - the three California Regional Associations and the Council on Foundations in opposing California Assembly Bill 624 because this legislation: • ignores the commitment of many of our members to better reflect, represent, and serve all populations through the impact of the operations - governance, staffing, business practices and grantmaking - of organized philanthropy, • mandates the collection of data related to the diversity of our boards, staff and grantees that may be impossible to accurately collect, and • has the potential to both negatively impact the very diverse populations and communities it seeks to serve, and to slow-rather than growphilanthropy and philanthropy' s commitment to serve such populations. RESOLVED further that, in recognition of both CMF's Board approved Diversity and Inclusion Initiative and the appropriate balance between the voluntary decisions of individual grantmakers with the sector' s responsibility to serve the common good and all of society, the Council of Michigan Foundations supports the call to action from the Council on Foundations that all of philanthropy join in a growing commitment to respond to the appropriate concerns about our lack of progress to date and our collective commitment to increasing our value for and leadership to the importance of diversity and inclusiveness in all that we do. ONGOING GOALS 1. Goal: Monitor and support the continued granting of property tax exemption by local units of government to foundations and nonprofit charitable organizations. Explanation: CMF, working with partners such as the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), is mon itoring cases that could adversely impact foundations where nonprofit organizations are being forced by local tax authorities to appeal their tax exemption status to the State Tax Tribunal, and if needed, consider filing letters of support w ith the Tax Tribunal. A landmark case in the State of Minnesota adversely impacting a nonprofit day care operator is being monitored by MNA and state nonprofit associations nationwide. *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 14 �2. Goal: Support legislation encouraging a tax-deduction for charitable contributions from individuals. Explanation: Other states have found that a tax deduction mirroring the federal tax code does motivate additional gifts by individuals to charities. While the introduction of legislation in tough economic times is unlikely, the Michigan Nonprofit Association continues to identify this as a legislative priority. 3. Goal: Monitor and report to the state on the use of tobacco settlement funds distributed to certified community foundations in 2001-2003 for health youth and healthy senior purposes. Explanation: Michigan's share of the national tobacco settlement ($206 billion over the next 26 years) between 46 states, five commonwealths and territories and the District of Columbia with five tobacco companies, representing 97.5% of the industry, is $8.3 billion. The master settlement agreement did not specify how states may spend their settlement payments. Between 2001 and 2003 CMF distributed from the state more that $20 million of interest earned on the tobacco settlement funds not used for the Merit Scholarship Program and earmarked annually through the Department of Career Development budget to certified community foundations for both pass through grantmaking and to endow Healthy Youth and Healthy Senior Funds. Because of the State's financial budget problems, no funds were appropriated for this effort in 2004 and 2005. The legislature passed legislation in 2006 with the Governor's support to securitize a major portion of the tobacco settlement to create the 21 st Century Jobs Fund. The balance of the tobacco settlement allocation was securitized by the state in 2007 to balance the budget. 4. Goal: Support legislation to simplify the Charitable Solicitations Act- SB 507. Explanation: Community foundations are required, as well as other charitable nonprofits, to file for an annual solicitation license. The licensing, enforcement, and appeal processes are not considered user friendly by nonprofits and do not reflect the changing cost in fundraising. The Michigan Nonprofit Association is leading the effort on this issue. Legislation proposed by Senator George is still being developed. 5. Goal: To assist the Charitable Trust Section of the Attorney General's office, an important source of information about charitable giving and the nonprofit sector in Michigan. Explanation: CMF has always worked with the Charitable Trust Section of the Office of the Attorney General. With the election of Attorney General Cox in *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 15 �2004, CMF and the Michigan Nonprofit Association proposed a more formal relationship to the Attorney General which he approved. As a result, the Nonprofit Council to the Charitable T rust Section, led by his Deputy Attorney General Carol Isaacs, was created. CMF has three representatives on the Council, which is considered a national model and is now being replicated by other Attorneys General. The Committee meets twice a year and assists the Section on issues related to charitable giving and charities. In addition, the staff leader of the Section attends the CMF Annual Conference. This relationship is vital because there are recent cases in which state attorneys general have initiated litigation against foundations for excess compensation and self dealing abuses and there are examples of unfavorable state legislation initiated by attorneys general 6. Goal: To support revisions to the Nonprofit Corporation Act Explanation: There have been no major amendments to the Act since it was adopted in 1982. A major revision of the Act has been completed by a Taskforce of the State Bar Association with the support ofCMF and MNA. However, due to tenn limits and the complexity of the total update of the Act, it has been detern1ined to update the Act in stages. The first step was successful passage of SB 123 now Public Act 9 of 2008 effective February 29, 2008 to permit the use of electronic transmission, such as email, for notices, waivers of notice, proxies, written consents and voting when participating in a meeting by remote communication. These amendments have the potential of streamlining the procedures for providing notices, obtaining signatures for written consents, and conducting meetings. In August 2008 the Governor signed into law HB 5681 which requires a minimum number of three T rustees instead of the present one for a nonprofit corporation, prohibits loans to staff, and requires nonprofits that are dissolving to notify the Attorney General within 60 days and obtain the written approval of the Attorney General for the disposition of assets- three priorities identified by the Nonprofit Panel convened by Independent Sector at the request of Senator Grassley and Senator Baucus. 7. Goal: To provide educational resources to members of the State legislature and the Office of the Attorney General on the issue of donor intent. Explanation: As a result of an investigation into the Ford Foundation by the Attorney General, HB 6351 was introduced by Representatives Dillon and Huizenga in June 2006 to redefined donor intent as a pattern of grantmaking in the first three years of a foundation's existence and the specification of a defined place, like the state of Michigan, in the founding documents. Due to vigorous opposition by CMF, the bill was not considered by a committee. *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 16 �In addition, CMF had two documents prepared, by the law finn Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone PLC during the summer of 2006 which were delivered to the two representatives and Deputy Attorney General Isaacs in September 2006. The first document is a review of existing laws that confirm the Attorney General does not need new legislation to oversee donor intent with regard to private foundations. The second document provides an introduction to donor intent from the perspective of a policy maker. Despite these efforts, in September 2006 HB 6535 the Charitable Foundations Accountability Act was introduced by Representative Huizenga without the support of Representative Dillon. CMF indicated its opposition to this bill and provided a Media Response Statement to members should the media ask about it. Representative Huizenga indicated that this Bill would not advance and was only introduced at the request of the Attorney General. There have been no further efforts in 2007 or 2008 by the Legislature to deal with the issue of Donor Intent. 8. Goal: To oppose reinstatement of a State Inheritance Tax, repealed in 1993 with support from CMF. Explanation: HB4377 the Michigan Estate tax act was introduced in March 2007 by Representative Paul Condino as part of a strategy to balance the states structural fiscal crisis. While this Bill was not considered by Committee, due to the state's continued structural financial crisis, CMF will monitor efforts to reinstate an Inheritance Tax at the state level. Based on documented data from the early 1990s, families of wealth will transfer their residency to their second homes in places like Florida if such a tax was reinstated. *Bolded text signifies 2008 update. Page 17 � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Government-Relations-Committee-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book government relations committee report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book government relations committee report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50745 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/0ed79cdb3ce331469e04a7068ef739f4.pdf f8aa8d84a4e184a51c9990f706ef92db PDF Text Text October 3, 2008 To: Diana Sieger, Chairperson and Members of the Board ofTrustees From: Carol Goss, Chairperson, Governance Committee cc: Rob Collier, President Re: Report of the Governance Committee- Action Requested The Governance Committee met by conference call on August 4, August 19 and on September 19 for three purposes: • • • To present Trustees for the Class of2011 for election by the membership, including three new Trustees, To discuss the Board's role in the Diversity and Inclusion Initiative, and To discuss the Board Development section of the October 13 Agenda The Governance Committee looks forward to discussing the results of our work and the following recommended Resolutions with you at the Board Meeting. I. Special Tribute As you know we lost two valued leaders and CMF Trustees this year with the passing of Lloyd Yeo, President of the Wickson-Link Memorial Foundation in Saginaw, and Gerald Smith, President & CEO, ofYouthVille Detroit. We will note their passing at the Annual Members Meeting on Monday morning October 13 before the Board and are asking for your approval of the following resolutions of tribute. RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees extends its appreciation to the family of Lloyd Yeo in gratitude for his dedicated service as trustee, treasurer, member of the Audit Committee and for his many years of leadership in strengthening and increasing philanthropy in Saginaw and Michigan. RESOLVED that the CMF Board of Trustees extends its appreciation to the family of Gerald Smith in gratitude for his dedicated service as trustee, co-chair of the 351h Annual Conference, officer of the Michigan AIDS Fund, member of the Public Policy Committee and for his visionary and tireless leadership on behalf of the youth of Detroit as founder of the Detroit Youth Foundation. II. Term Limited Trustee The bylaws of CMF limit trustees to nine years of service. This year we must report that Diana Sieger, our Board Chairperson, completes her nine years of service to CMF and is therefore term limited. In recognition of her outstanding leadership, we offer the following resolution for your consideration and approval. �RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees of the Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF) extends it appreciation to Diana Sieger, President of the Grand Rapids Community Foundation, for her nine years of dedicated service as a Trustee of CMF, including: chairing the Community Foundations Committee, supporting the transition of our supporting organization to Midwest Community Foundations' Ventures, leading development ofthe Cultural C ompetency Plan and Organizational Analysis, and chairing the Board of Trustees for the two years 2006 to 2008, and we welcome Diana' s continued involvement with CMF and advocacy for philanthropy as a member of CMF' s Advisory Cabinet. III. Class of 2011 The membership has approved the election of the slate of trustees as attached for the Class of2011. We are grateful to the following six trustees for agreeing to serve again: • • Melonie B. Colaianne, President, MASCO Corporation Foundation, Taylor David 0. Egner, President and CEO, Hudson-Webber Foundation, Detroit • • Russell L. Gabier, Secretary/Trustee, Irving S. Gilmore Foundation, Kalamazoo Phillip H. Peters, V.P. Administration, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, Flint • Margaret E. Thompson, Trustee, Harry A. and Margaret D. Towsley Foundation, Midland • Christian A. Velasquez, Trustee, Midland Area Community Foundation, Midland After considering a number of qualifies candidates, the Comm ittee is pleased that the following three individuals have agreed to serve: • Hugo E. (Ted) Braun, Jr. , President, Harvey Randall W ickes Foundation, Saginaw • Andrea M. Cole, Executive Director & CEO, Ethel and James Flinn Foundation, Detroit • Brenda L. Hunt, President and CEO, Battle Creek Community Foundation, Battle Creek Therefore, we ask fo r approval of the following resolution: RESOLVED that the actions of the Governance Committee on the Class of 2011, as detailed in the attached ballot (Attachment A), be accepted. IV. Board Development Opportunity for the October 13 Meeting We are delighted to have Ralph Smith, Chair of the Council on Foundations, as our guest at the Board Meeting on October 13. A copy of Ralph's bio is in your Board book, along with his priorities as Chair ofCOF, and a section from the Council on Foundations Strategic Plan that specifically addresses the relationship with regional associations of �grantmakers. As CMF moves forward with the Diversity and Inclusion Initiative, our conversation with him will be both challenging and inspiring. V. Diversity and Inclusion Initiative The Governance Committee has been charged with oversight of the Initiative and along with several other CMF members serves as the Advisory Committee for the Initiative. As noted in the Initiative update under the President's Report, we had our first meeting in June immediately after a very successful CEO Roundtable facilitated by Mary Ellen Capek, a lead consultant with the Diversity in Philanthropy Project. As part of the baseline data collection, Chair Sieger, immediate past Chair Fisher Cummings and Committee Chair Goss have been interviewed about CMF Policies and Practices relative to diversity and inclusive practice by Initiative evaluators from the Community Research Institute, Johnson Center for Philanthropy & Nonprofit Leadership, at Grand Valley State University. At the September 19 Committee Conference Call the Committee reviewed the proposed required capacities and scope of work for potential consultants to help the Board in its training, policy and process reviews. The Committee also reviewed the proposed text for the introduction to the Diversity Perceptions Survey that the Community Research Institute w ill be completing later in October. All Trustees are asked to complete this 15 minute survey. As we will discuss at the Board Meeting, we encourage all Trustees to save the March 2-4, 2009 dates for the Knowledge Symposium on Becoming a Diverse and Inclusive Foundation. Finally, the Committee recommends that the Board ofCMF adopt the following DRAFT resolution incorporating the five principles from the Diversity in Philanthropy Project (DPP) included with this report as Attachment B. This Resolution supports CMF Guiding Principle number 6, one of the 7 Guiding Principles required of membership: "Strive to include the perspectives, opinions, and experiences of the broadest possible cross-section of people to inform the foundation through its grantmaking, through the composition of its Board, committees, staff and advisors/consultants and through its business practices." RESOLVED that we encourage all foundation leaders to embrace the following common principles that promote a broad approach to diversity, equity and inclusion as a matter of fairness and effectiveness in our profession by believing in: • Mutual Respect - fundamentally valuing and respecting experiences different from our own, • Freedom and Flexibility- respect for each individual foundation ' s commitment to address those aspects most germane to its mission, • Knowledge and Creativity- becoming more creative and informed investors • An Intentional Approach -formalizing meaningful goals in our governance and programming • Transparency - regularly reporting progress and lessons learned �October 6, 2008 To: Diana Sieger, Chairperson, and Members of the Board ofTrustees From: Carol Goss, Chairperson, Governance Committee cc: Rob Collier, President Re: Slate of Officers for 2008-09 On behalf of the members of the Governance Committee, I am pleased to present the following slate of officers for approval for the next year. Slate of Officers for 2008-09 RESOLVED that the following individuals be elected to the offices as specified for a one-year term effective October 14, 2008. Chairperson - Melonie Colaianne, President, MASCO Corporation Foundation Vice Chair Community Foundations - Elizabeth Cherin, President, Fremont Community Foundation Vice Chair Family Foundations- Betsy Upton Stover, Trustee, FrederickS. Upton Foundation Vice Chair Corporate Foundations- Caroline Chambers, President, Comerica Charitable Foundation Secretary- John Colina, President, Colina Foundation Treasurer- Phillip Peters, Vice President- Administration and Secretary, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation President- Robert Collier We are grateful to Melonie for agreeing to serve as Chair of the Board and to Libby, Betsy, and Phil for agreeing to continue their service as officers. We welcome Caroline and John to the Executive Committee and appreciate their willingness to serve. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Governance-Committee Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book governance committee Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book governance committee. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50744 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/ee6ffdb5b668b14d5e31a69b593a6319.pdf 0404f1cab2f5bef06886e018c984f483 PDF Text Text CMF Council of M ichi an Foun~ations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. Date: September 30, 2008 Memo to: Diana Sieger, Chairperson, and Members of the Board of Trustees F rom: Phillip Peters, Audit Committee Chair Dave Lindberg R E: CMF 8-31 -08 Internal Financial Statements R ESOLVED that the 8-31-08 Internal Financial Statements be accepted as recommended by the CMF Audit Committee. On September 29, 2008, the CMF Audit Committee met and accepted the enclosed internal financial report as of August 31, 2009. Core Operations Note 1: Additional Member Contributions The bulk of this category is the $150,000 grant from Kellogg. Note 2: Conference & Meeting Revenue With registrations for the Annual Conference remaining strong, the revenue goal of $500,000 and surplus of $123,000 appear to be on target. Note 3: Investment Income While the rate of return has dropped below 2% vs. 5% for last year, overall income has remained close to budget due to the $ 1.3 mill ion in ECIC money that was held through 815-08. With the ECIC funds now disbursed the year to date budget will probably fall $20,000-$30,000 short of the overall goal of $138,000. Note 4: W ages & Benefits The variance from budget is due to the following items. I Director of Corporate Services - position not filled S:\Boards and Committees\C MF\Board\2008-09\ 10.13.08 Meeting Material s\Treasurer's Report 8-31-08.doc $25,89o I �I Additional time to Philanthropy 3D and Diversity projects 2,976 1 Note 5: Postage The credit balance is due to the refund received on the funds remaining in the old postage machine which was replaced in April 2008. Note 6: Technology The variance from budget is due to projects which have not started. Note 7: Communications/Publications The variance from budget is due to projects which have not started. Note 8: Professional Services Line Item Newsclip Service Lobbying- Public Affairs Legal Audit .Fees Mise Total Actual 4-1-08 to 8-31-08 $2,844 7,500 4,709 4,450 2,440 $21,943 Budget 08-09 $4,500 18,000 11,000 4,500 2,000 $40,000 The misc. amount was used to provide Matrix Management training for CMF staff. .William Allen Fund This fund supports the members' spring legislative trip to Washington DC. Russell G. Mawby Fund Association Dues & Sponsorships MNA Sponsorship SuperConference Michigan Women's Foundation - Women of Achievement Dinner National Center for Family Philanthropy Online service Association ofFundraising Professionals- National Philanthropy Day sponsorship MNA Nonprofit Day sponsorship $1,000 500 3,600 500 500 S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\ 10.13.08 Meeting Materials\Treasurer's Report 8-31-08.doc �ra.uth & Russ Mawby Fund for Kids This fund supports the YAC summer intern and the Summer Youth Conference. The major billing from the University of Michigan for the Summer Youth Conference has not been received as of 8-31-08. Community Foundation Endowment Fund 1 At this time it appears total expenses should remain within budget for the current fiscal year. MCFYP Endowment Fund This fund supports the YAC Program Associate position. Dorothy Johnson Educational Fund The plan is to use $10,000 of this fund to support the Family Foundation Summer Retreat which took place in June 2008, w ith the remaining $39,000 supporting the CMF Annual Conference. iecker Leadership Fund The fund supports 65% the Public Policy Fellow position. William Richardson Endowment Fund This fund supports the remaining 35% of the Public Policy Fellow' s wages. Community Foundation Technology Endowment Fund This fund primarily covers technical support provided to FIMS sites by Bill Nethercut, software consultant. arl Reitz Endowment Fund This fund supports investment educational events for foundation staff and trustees. S:\Boards and Committees\C MF\Board\2008-09\ 10.13.08 Meeting Material s\Treasurer's Report 8-31-08.doc �CMF Core Services Endowment Fund $30,000 was transferred from this fund to CMF Core Services. This represents the 5% spendable income available from this fund on an annual basis. S:\Boards and Committees\C MF\Board\2008-09\ 10.13.08 Meeting Material s\Treasurer's Report 8-31-08.doc �Council of Michigan Foundations & Supporting Organizations Consolidated Balance Sheet August 31, 2008 II CMF Core & Spec ial Projects ASSETS Cash & Equivalents Investments Grants Receivable Due From Other Funds Property, Plant & Equipment - Net Other Assets Total Assets LIAB ILITIES Accounts Payable Grants Liabilities Deferred/Other Liabilities Total Liabilities NET ASSETS (FUND BALANCE) Unrestricted & Tern p Restrict. Endowment Funds KYIP Fund Total Net Assets Total Liabilities & Net Assets S :\Finance\Finandat Statements\08-09\CMF FS 8-31-08 $5,440,394 3,369,172 (3,033,258) 397,783 32,216 $6,206,307 $22,860 0 43,131 65,991 Endowment Funds $20,853 16,538,255 (27,661) $16,531 ,447 Supporting Organizations Michigan AIDS MCFV LTG Fund $6,096,906 $17,078 $3,028,565 3,087,235 1,989 219,309 $9,186,130 $3,264,952 $601,641 177,351 (24 5,625) 6,972 13,112 $553,451 $ 0 6,140,316 0 0 48,000 64,000 112,000 3,930,259 3,264,952 441,451 Total $ 12,176,872 19,566,820 3,546,523 0 406,744 45,328 $35,742,287 $22,860 48,000 107,131 177,991 6 ,140,316 16,531,447 5,255,871 9,186,130 3,264,952 441,451 13,776,978 16,531,447 5,255,871 35,564,296 $6,206,307 $16,531,447 $9,186,130 $3,264,952 $553,451 $35,742,287 16,531 ,447 �Counc il of Mic higan Foundatio ns & Supporting Organizations Co ns olidat ed Statem ent of Activities and Changes in Net Asset s 4-1-08 to 8-31-08 II Council of Mich igan Foundations Supporting Organizations Michigan A IDS MCFV LTG Fun d CMF Core Services Revenues Spendable Income Membership Investment Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Conference Income Publications Other Income Investment Income Total Revenues Program/Admi n Expenses Wages & Benefits Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Depreciation Technology Dues & Sponsorship Books & Subscriptions Communications!Publications Professiona l Services Travel Training & Seminars Conference & Meeting (GainVLoss sale of fixed assets Overhead Allocation to Spec Proj Total Program/Admin $0 893,529 Special Projects Endowment Funds $0 $722,200 607,664 600 23,275 159,760 22,692 364,378 10,288 200 69, 164 1,520,011 400,554 29,209 4,821 864 (990) 8,482 3,954 10 608,274 575 12,659 !277,245! 481,464 128,430 135,536 8,389 35 0 207 840 0 1,32 1 435 197 1,662 17,054 27,594 11,702 2,050 1,625 410 21,682 9,107 21,943 21,360 4,602 153,700 0 !542! 717,999 746 6 ,250 CMF Total $722,200 893,529 159,760 630,356 388,253 10,863 12,859 208,071 2.609,749 664,520 37,598 6,177 864 (348) 9,519 3,954 1,662 29,592 s Combined Total 79,707 280,507 (38.312! !38, 142! 3,120 157,157 $722 ,200 893,529 159,760 985,349 388,253 10,877 12,859 163,556 2 ,2 87,071 59,701 2,083 106,110 15,588 2,224 1,348 888 16,652 1,388 1,690 832 ,414 53,186 8,573 2,212 552 30,568 8,118 3,352 433 3,500 1,231 31,689 500 6,284 2,834 200 3,464 82,261 11,974 508 1,388 39,469 2,460 30,789 54 2 ,525 60,354 8 ,250 182,168 200,800 $156 s 154 ,037 14 172 (750) 1,388 433 12 5,147 1,388 14,294 14,910 1,780 18,551 35,469 2,460 30,789 400,271 45 ,414 7 ,542 177,403 540,325 194,020 (542 1.452,344 114 ,698 542 25,887 243.750 1,836,679 51,786 51,786 71 ,600 71 ,600 123,386 123,386 2,096,391 2,096,391 698,750 698,750 70,250 70,250 2 ,988,777 2,988,777 (762,779) (156,843) (1 ,816,185) 598,294 38,102,681 364,034 9,144 1,160 5,152 0 53,709 132 (87) GRANTS Challenge Grants Mini· Granls Computer Grants Other Grants Total Grants Excess Revenues Over Expenditures Beginning Net Assets Transfer from MCFV Cha nge in Net Assets Ending Net Assets $'1.,..,c.IF.,aftt.... S'-eeiO'".ot'Ct.IFFSI·)1.QI 802,012 16,163 215,844 1,034 ,019 1,224,597 0 802,012 $2,026,609 4 ,097,544 17,037,803 22 ,359,944 11 ,1 16,712 16,163 $4,113,707 !506,356! $ 16,531 ,447 311 ,8 19 22,671 ,763 p ,930,582! !762,779~ $9,186,130 $3,264,952 (1 ,930.582) 4 ,027,731 !'56,643! $441 ,451 (2,538,385 $35,564 ,296 �Council of Michigan Foundations Core Services Internal Statement of Activities 4-1-08 to 8-31-08 12 Month Budget 2008-09 Revenues Membership Investment Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Conference & Meetings Publications Other Income Investment Earnings Total Revenues Program/Admin Expenses Wages & Benefits Occupancy Telephone Equipment Lease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Insurance Equipment & Furniture Depreciation Technology Dues & Sponsorship Books & Subscriptions Communications/Publications Professional Services Travel T raining & Seminars Conference & Meetings (Gain)/Loss Sale of Fixed Assets Overhead Allocation to Spec Projects Total Program/Admin 5 Month Budget 8/31 /2008 $ 1,006,000 166,000 25,000 598,000 15,000 2,000 138,000 1,950,000 $ 5 Month Actual 8/31 /2008 935,000 161,000 25,000 225,000 6,300 500 75,000 1,427,800 $ 893,529 159,760 22,692 364,378 10,288 200 69,164 1,520,01 1 Note 3 Note 4 30,800 28,600 2,100 36,700 19,400 26,300 3,800 87,300 17,054 27,594 2,050 21 ,682 21 ,943 21 ,360 4,602 153,700 Note 6 (700) 718,700 (542) 717,999 422,500 28,400 5,300 1,300 8,300 12,600 6,000 74,000 34,500 5,000 88,000 40,000 63,000 9,000 484,000 (1 ,500) 1,950,000 0 0 0 Excess Revenues Over Expenditures 0 709,100 802,012 1,224,597 0 1,224,597 709,100 1,224,597 802,012 1,224,597 1,933,697 $2,026,609 S:\Finance\Financial Statements\08·09\CMF FS 8-31..08 Note 2 400,554 29,209 4,821 864 (990) 8,482 3,954 1,662 1,014 ,000 68,000 13,000 3,000 20,000 30,000 6,000 Grants Challenge Grants Mini-Grants Computer Grants Other Grants Total Grants Beginning Net Assets Excess Rev over Exp. Transfer to Core Endowment Ending Net Assets Note 1 Note 5 Note 7 Note 8 Note 2 �CMF Endowment Fu nds Consolidated Statement of Act ivities and Cha nges in Net Assets 4 -1-08 to 8-31-08 Endowment Funds Russell G. M aw by Johns on Allen Maw by Educational Fund Fund Fund For Kids Revenues Spendable Income Membership Investment Additional Member Contributions Other Grants Conference Income Publications Other Income Investment Income Total Revenues 8,600 $ 73.000 $ 4 2,000 Fund $ 49,000 Community Foundation E ndowment MCFYP Rie cker hchnology Richardson Public Inves t. Endowment Fund Fund Policy Education ' ' 358,000 Comm Fdn 57.000 ' 56,000 ' 24.000 ' 22,000 Re itz ' 2.600 12 Month Budget CMF Core ' 30,000 ~ To tal ' 722,200 722,200 23,275 575 12.659 (277.245) 36, 100 3.500 23,600 (200) (125) 575 12 ,659 (3,373) 5.227 Program(Admin Expenses wages & Benefits Occupancy TelephOne Equipment l ease & Maintenance Postage Supplies Ins urance Equipment & Furniture Depreciation TechnolOgy Dues & Spons orship Books & Subscriptions 28,871 44,704 (17.532) 48.068 17,272) 31 ,728 4 ,729 37 62 (140,656) 229,803 (22.580) 34.295 (22,177) 33,823 89,980 15,305 16.298 831 490 35 39 100 100 196 350 450 150 6.1 00 8.947) 15.053 (6,952) 15,048 (769) 1.831 (8,11 6) 21,884 9,224 481.464 761,800 135.536 362,000 1.321 1,500 435 197 1,100 746 200 6 .250 11,000 14.100 14,294 26,600 75, 100 500 CommunicationsiPublications Professional Services 8,691 Tral'el Training & Seminars Conference & Meeting Total Program/Ad min 1,142 699 75 7,048 1,270 4 19.104 232 7,255 24,706 108,171 GRANTS Challenge Grants Mini-Grants Computer Grants Other G rants 5,603 20 1 245 (225) 16.492 5,820 14 ,910 1.780 18,551 190 ( 564) 22,569 5.603 9,224 194.020 31,000 4 .000 95, 100 622,200 20,000 39,000 Total G rants 39.000 Excess Re.,enoes O l'er Expenditures 5,227 37.449 23.362 Beginning Net A sset s Transfer from Other Funds Ex cess Re...enoes Ol'er Ex penditures Ending Net A ssets 202,292 1,737,4 15 1,009,982 3.373 $198,919 S :\Finance\Finandat Statements\08·09\CMF FS 8 -31-08 (35 ~51 ) $ 1,701 .864 18.638 $991 ,344 (7,272) 1,15 1,574 (56;72) $1 .095.302 121,632 17.803 11,254 9.450 5,824 8.580,765 1,380.440 1.37 1,052 543,312 431 ,484 236,368 $8.344 ,397 (39, ;97) $1 ,341.243 44,;46) $ 1.326,306 (14.~50) $528.762 16,;76) $41 5,308 2.600 30,000 2.600 30,000 (769) (8,11 6) 71 ,600 71 ,600 215.844 53.836 575,651 17,037,803 (3,;69 38,11 6 $ 537,535 506.356 16 .531 .447 $50.467 119,600 139,600 17,037,803 ~ �CMF Council of Michi an Foun~ations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. Date: September 30, 2008 Memo to: Diana Sieger, Chairperson, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Rachel Mraz, CMF Trustee and Investment Committee Member and David R. Lindberg, Vice President Finance & Administration Re: June 30, 2008 Investment Report The following Resolution is presented fo r consideration: RESOLVED that the June 30,2008 Investment Report be accepted as presented. On a quarterly basis, the combined Investment Committees for the Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF), Midwest Community Foundations' Ventures (MCFV), Learning to Give (LTG) and the Michigan AIDS Fund (MAF), meet to review the investment performance for the operating and permanent endowment funds. New Business On September 5, 2008, the Investment Committee reviewed and approved the enclosed report. Since the May 20, 2008, CMF Board meeting, the Investment Committee has dealt with the following issues: • On May 15, 2008, Munder notified CMF of its plan to liquidate the Real Estate Investment Fund by June 27, 2008, due to Comerica's plan to liquidate its investment in the Fund, which represented more than 50% of the Fund's assets. Shortly after this notification CMF liquidated its share of this investment which totaled approximately $709,000 and reinvested this balance in the TIFF MultiAsset Fund. • Due to problems experienced by some money market vehicles in the past several months the CMF money market accounts were transferred to the JP Morgan US Treasury Plus money market accounts, which are invested in U.S . Treasury Repurchase Agreements, Notes & Bills. • A meeting has been scheduled for October 15, 2008 with TIFF to talk further about the TIFF products and consider possibly investing a larger portion of the CMF Endowment Pool in the Multi-Asset Fund. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\ 10.13.08 Meeting Materials\Investment Report 6-3008.doc �Investment Report Page 2 Alternative vs. Standa rd Allocation Investment Pools With the addition of the TIFF and Commonfund alternative products, the CMF Endowment Pool now has standard and alternative asset allocation pools. The standard allocation pool is rebalanced on a quarterly basis to the targeted asset allocation noted in the attached report. The TIFF investment product rebalancing is handled by TIFF. The combined allocation of the standard and alternative allocation pools will be monitored on a quarterly basis by the Investment Committee with adjustments between the two pools being made as the Committee deems appropriate. The combined investment return for the CMF Standard and Alternative Pools will be calculated as the various periods become available. The enclosed Investment Report is presented in the fo llowing two sections: Investment Performance Report & Asset Allocation The benchmark is based on the targeted asset allocation noted in the attached report using the following return information: Asset Class S&P 500 S&P 400 S&P 600 EAfE Lehman Bros. Aggregate Allocation 39.0% 10.0% 6.0% 14.0% 3 1.0% Investment Perfor mance Comparison Report In addition to the Cambridge & Associates, Inc. pool of colleges, universities, and foundations, the committee has recently added the TIFF Multi-Asset fund for comparative purposes. The TIFF product is unique in the fact that it offers smaller foundations access to alternative investment products which have enhanced returns over the last several years. The reason this report lags the CMF Investment Report by one quarter is due to the time it takes Cambridge & Associates to collect the results from the pool participants. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\ 10.13.08 Meeting Materials\Investment Report 6-3008.doc �Council of Michigan Foundations Investment Report June 30, 2008 Investment Balanc e 6-30-08 Actual Asset Allocation Money Mkt Tar geted Asset Allocation Money Mkt. Operating Funds CMF Operating & Special Projects $4,822,595 100% 100% MCFV Special Projects $2,577,454 100% 100% KYIP Fund $5,544,563 100% 100% Michigan AIDS Fund $342,357 100% 100% Learning to Give $751 ,188 100% 100% Note: All operating funds are invested in money market accounts. CMF Combined Endowment Pool -Asset Mix Market Value Equities Fixed Income Real Estate Alternatives Cash Total $10,892,422 4,456,217 69,457 1,263,890 74,636 16,756,622 % 65.0% 26.6% 0.4% 7.5% 0.4% 100.0% Endowment Pool Compound Annual Rate of Return One Year Three Year Five Year 10Year Ac tual Investment Return -4.51 % N/A N/A N/A Blended Benchmark -6.01 % N/A N/A N/A The CMF Endowment Pool has been broken down into two separate pools, a standard pool and an alternative pool. The asset mix listed above represents the combination of both pools. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\ 10.13.08 Meeting Materials\lnvest Report 6-30-08 �Council of Michigan Foundations Investment Report June 30, 2008 CMF Standard Endowment Pool- Asset Mix Market Value LargeCap MidCap SmaiiCap International Real Estate Equity Trust Total Equities $4,668,849 1,217,242 760,501 1,537,011 Cash Equivalents Short Bond Fund Bond Fund High Yield Bond Total Cash & Fixed Income Grand Total $ Actual % Target % 8,183,603 38.8% 10.1% 6.3% 12.8% 0.0% 68% 37% 9% 6% 13% 5% 70% 74,636 1,613,003 1 ,560,129 607,038 3,854,806 0.6% 13.4% 13.0% 5.0% 32% 0% 13% 13% 5% 30% 12,038,409 100% 100% Standard Endowment Pool Compound Annual Rate of Return One Year Three Year Five Year 10 Year Actual Investment Return -6.20% 6.33% 9.08% 5.85% Blended Benchmark -6.01 % 5.77% 8.46% 5.14% S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\10.13.08 Meeting Materials\lnvest Report 6-30-08 �Learning to Give Investment Report June 30, 2008 LTG Endowment Fund -Asset Mix Market Value LargeCap MidCap SmaiiCap International Real Estate Equity Trust Total Equities $1,173,784 312,950 179,921 387,813 Cash Equivalents Short Bond Fund Bond Fund High Yield Bond Total Cash & Fixed Income Grand Total Actual % $ Target % 2,054,468 38.5% 10.3% 5.9% 12.7% 0.0% 67% 37% 9% 6% 13% 5% 70% 16,457 408,143 408,867 159,149 992,616 0.5% 13.4% 13.4% 5.2% 33% 0% 13% 13% 5% 30% 3,047,084 100% 100% Endowment Pool Compound Annual Rate of Return One Year Three Year Five Year 10Year Actual Investment Return -6.82% N/A N/A N/A Lipper Median Benchmark -6.01 % N/A N/A N/A Investment of this new endowment fund took place in May 2006 This fund was established with a $3,000,000 grant from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\10.13.08 Meeting Materials\lnvest Report 6-30-08 �Council of Michigan Foundations Investment Performance Comparison 3/31 /2008 Actual Returns Period Ending Quarter One Year Blended Benchmark -5. 17% CMF Cambridge Pooled Pool Funds (Median) -5.37% -4.50% TIFF Multi Asset -3.40% -2.05% -2.47% 3.40% 6.38% 7.08% 7.35% 10.30% 11.99% Five Years 11.56% 11.76% 13.40% 15.86% Ten Years 5.67% 6.01% 7.70% 8.28% Three Years Bench Marks W ilshire 5000 S&P 500 Russell 2500 LB Aggregate MSCI EAFE CPI-U Qtr Ending -9.5% -9.4% -9.4% 2.2% -8.9% 1.7% Asset Categories Cambridge Pool US Equities International Equities Fixed Income (less high yield) Cash Other Total Other· Detail Real Estate Hedge Funds Distressed Securities Arbitrage Venture Capital Private Equity Oil & Gas Partnerships High Yield Bonds Other NMAA Absolute Return Commodities Othe r 24.5% 21.4% 17.1% 2.7% 34.3% 100.0% Period Ending One Yr Three Yrs -5.8% 6.4% -5.1% 5.9% -1 1.3% 6.0% 7.7% 5.5% -2.7% 13.3% 4.0% 3.4% Asset Allocation CMF Target 55.0% 14.0% 26.0% 5.0% 100.0% 4.7% 12.6% 1.4% 5.4% 1.4% 3.3% 1.0% 0.2% 0.4% 3.9% 34.3% Five Yrs Ten Yrs 12.5% 3.9% 11.3% 3.5% 15.7% 6.9% 4.6% 6.0% 2 1.4% 6.2% 3.0% 2.8% TIFF Multi Asset 51.4% Includes Inti & Resource 12.4% 36.2% 100.0% 1.5% 5.0% 1.8% 5.0% 20.8% 4.2% 7.9% 36.2% • Represents the latest return numbers available from Cambridge & TIFF. S:\Boards and Committees\CMF\Board\2008-09\10.13.08 Meeting Materials\lnvest Report 6-30-08 �Date: October 3, 2008 Memo to: Diana Sieger, Chairperson, and Members of the Board of Trustees From: Phillip Peters, Audit Committee Chair David Lindberg RE: CMF March 31, 2008 & 2007 Audit Report The following Resolution is presented for approval. RESOLVED that the March 31, 2008 & 2007 Audit Report be accepted as presented. Approval of the Audit was deferred to the October 13 Meeting at the May 22 Board Meeting because the Audit Report was not available for review in advance of that Meeting. Differences between Internal Statements and Audited Statements Due to the multi-year grant commitments received from Kellogg for their additional membership dues and Skillman for the Detroit office we will have a difference between the internal and audited statements for CMF Core Operations until both of these grants end. The accounting rules require multi-year grants to be booked as revenue in the year the grant commitment was made, even though the revenue supports future year activities. Grant Kellogg Additional Member Contribution ($750,000 for 2005-06 to 2009-201 0) Skillman Detroit Office Support ($75,000 2006-07 to 2008-09) Additional Revenue Booked Per Internal Statements $150,000 25,000 For audit report purposes the total amount of both grants were booked as revenue in 2005-06. �Combined Statement of Financial Position Cash The decrease from the prior year is due to the reduction in cash held for special projects, primarily the Early Childhood Investment Corporation and Access to Recreation grants from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Investments The establishment of the CMF Core Services Endowment Fund increased investments by $600,000 for 2007-08, but was offset by the negative investment earnings for the same period. Grants Receivable The decrease from the prior year is due primarily to the balances remaining on the following grants that were awarded in 2006-07. Grant Access to Recreation Early Childhood Investment Corporation A/R 3-31-08 $ 1,475,000 2,950,000 AIR 3-31-07 $7,285,000 4,250,000 (a!, Grants Payable $ 1,300,000 of the increase is due to an outstanding grant due to the Early Childhood Investment Corporation. Other Liabilities The increase from the prior year is due to the 2008-09 membership dues collected prior to April I , 2008. Net Assets- Unrestricted- CMF C ore Services Endowment Fund This fund was set up in May 2007. Net Assets- Temporarily Restricted The decrease from the prior year is due to reduction in balances of the following special projects. Grant Access to Recreation Early Childhood Investment Corporation KYIP (Kellogg Youth Initiative Project) Learning to Give support for The LEAGUE Balance 3-31-08 $4,696,685 3,060,500 4,741 ,580 725,000 Balance 3-31-07 $ 10,954,694 4,213,907 6,456,130 1,381,250 �Combined Statement of Activities Grant Support The decrease from the prior year is primarily due to the following grants that were awarded in 2006-07: Access to Recreation Early Childhood Investment Corporation $14,767,161 6,339,775 Publications- Expense The decrease from the prior year is due to The Michigan Foundation Directory which is produced every other year. Professional Fees The increase is due to the Government Perfonnance Improvement Initiative (GPII) which is new in 2007-08. �REHMANN ROBSON Certified A member of T H E Public Accountants RE HMA NN GROU P May 19, 2008 To the Board of Directors of Council of Michigan Foundations Grand Haven, Michigan We have audited the financial statements of the Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations (the "Organization") for the year ended March 31 , 2008, and have issued our report thereon dated May 19, 2008. Professional standards require that we provide you with the following infonnation related to our audit. Our Responsibility Under Auditing Standards Generally Accepted in the United States of America and Government Auditing Standards As stated in our engagement letter dated May 1, 2008, our responsibility, as described by professional standards, is to express opinions about whether the financial statements prepared by management w ith your oversight are fairly presented, in all material respects, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Our audit of the financial statements does not relieve you or management of your responsibilities. As part of our audit, we considered the internal control of the Organization. Such considerations were solely for the purpose of determining our audit procedures and not to provide any assurance concerning such internal control. As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of the Organization 's compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grants. However, the objective of our tests was not to provide an opinion on compliance with such provisions. Planned Scope and Timing of the Audit We performed the audit according to the planned scope and timing previously communicated to you in our meeting about planning matters on April 28, 2008. ~ ilnndepenllentmember~tf BAKE R TILLY INTERNATIONAL 2330 East Paris Avenue, SE •P.O. Box 6547 • Grand Rapids. Ml 495 16 • 6 16.975.4 100 • Fax 6 16.975.4400 • www.rehmann.com �Significant Audit Findings Qualitative Aspects ofAccounting Practices Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. In accordance with the terms of our engagement letter, we will advise management about the appropriateness of accounting policies and their application. The significant accounting policies used by the Organization are described in Note 1 to the financial statements. No new accounting policies were adopted and the application of existing policies was not changed during the year. We noted no transactions entered into by the governmental unit during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative guidance or consensus. There are no significant transactions that have been recognized in the financial statements in a different period than when the transaction occurred. Accounting estimates are an integral part of the financial statements prepared by management and are based on management's knowledge and experience about past and current events and assumptions about future events. Certain accounting estimates are particularly sensitive because of their significance to the financial statements and because of the possibility that future events affecting them may differ significantly from those expected. The most sensitive estimate affecting the financial statements was: • Management's estimate of the useful lives of depreciable capital assets is based on the length of time it is believed that those assets will provide some economic benefit in the future. We evaluated the key factors assumptions used to develop these estimates in detennining that they are reasonable in relation to the financial statements taken as a whole. Difficulties Encountered in Performing the Audit We encountered no significant difficulties in dealing with management in performing and completing our audit. Corrected and Uncorrected Misstatements The attached schedule summarizes uncorrected misstatements of the financial statements. Management has determined that their effects are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. In addition, none of the misstatements detected as a result of audit procedures and corrected by management were material, either individually or in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. �Disagreements with Management For purposes of this letter, professional standards define a disagreement with management as a financial accounting, reporting, or auditing matter, whether or not resolved to our satisfaction, that could be significant to the financial statements or the auditor's report. We are pleased to report that no such disagreements arose during the course of our audit. Management Representations We have requested certain representations from management that are included in the management representation letter dated May 19, 2008. Management Consultations with Other Independent Accountants In some cases, management may decide to consult with other accountants about auditing and accounting matters, similar to obtaining a "second opinion" on certain situations. If a consultation involves application of an accounting principle to the Entity's financial statements or a determination of the type of auditor's opinion that may be expressed on those statements, our professional standards require the consulting accountant to check with us to determine that the consultant has all the relevant facts. To our knowledge, there were no such consultations with other accountants. Other Audit Findings or Issues We generally discuss a variety of matters, including the application of accounting principles and auditing standards, with management each year prior to retention as the governmental unit's auditors. However, these discussions occurred in the normal course of our professional relationship and our responses were not a condition to our retention. This information is intended solely for the use of the governing body and management of the Council of Michigan Foundations and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. Very truly yours, �Council of Michigan Foundations Comments and Recommendations For the Year Ended March 31, 2008 In planning and perfonning our audit of the fmancial statements of the Council of Michigan Foundations (the "Organization") as of and for the year ended March 31, 2008, in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, we considered the Organization's internal control over financial reporting (internal control) as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization's internal control. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the Organization's internal control. A control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the entity's ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report financial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity's financial statements that is more than inconsequential wi ll not be prevented or detected by the entity's internal control. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in more than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected by the entity's internal control. Our consideration of internal control was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph and would not necessarily identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. We did not identify any defici encies in internal control that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. Other Matters Processing ofCheck Deposits Checks received in the mail are processed using a check scanner through the bank's web access site. There is a risk that the person scanning the checks could scan a particular check and then take the paper check to another bank and cash or deposit the check again. This is possible because the person scanning the checks is also responsible for applying the restrictive stamp "For Deposit Only" to the back of the checks received. To convert the check, this person would have to omit the stamp on checks that were to be cashed twice. We recommend that the receptionist who opens the mail be responsible for applying the restrictive stamp. * * * * * -1- �Council of Michigan Foundations Schedule of Adjustment< Passed (SOAP) For the March 31, 2008 Audit In accordance with the provisions of SAS 89, Audit Adjustments, we have prepared the following schedule of proposed audit adjustments, which we believe arc immaterial both ind ividually and in the aggrcgalc. Also in accordance w ith SAS 89, we arc providing this schedule to both managcmcnl and the audit committee- to receive their assurance that lhcy agree that the amounts listed below arc not material to the financial stalcmcnts, either individually or in the aggregate, and do not need to be recorded. Effect of Passed Adjustment • Ovcr(Undcr)Statcmcnt Beginning Assets Unposted prior accrual for compensated absences payable, including FICA taxes payable Liabilities Fund Balance (36,966) Current year change in compensated absences payable and FICA on that ba lance 11,444 PY overaccrual of unemployment claims payable · no probable risk 53,000 CY adjLtStment of unemployment claims payable · no probable risk (22,000) PY overstatement of prepaid Fourm dues CY overstatement of prepaid forum dues Cummulative Effect Expenses/ Expenditures 36,966 11,444 (53,000) (22,000) 5,156 5,05 1 5,051 Revenue 5, !56 (5,05 1) 5,478 (10,878) ( 10,451) �CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Serving grantmokers. Advoncing giving. May 19,2008 O iu" R. §je!-~• C[..,,;.. G,.~d R..Jpids c.:U,unrt(;.iry l'IHJr.dtuinn llliuhl:'ch /1, r.h.rrin, Vi"-'Chtrtr; (..'IIJI(IIffurtil)' l;,.,,..wt~'fl f'r<mOI'o( " " " c.... munhy t'<o•u•<l~rion Rehma nn Robson M.oo";~ !\.<"•~·""'"'· v;,Cwi• r;..,.,..,.,.nif.oll·'lll'f 2330 £ast Paris Avenue, SE M.\SCO WJooc><ion fourocl>t;on Grand Rapids, MI 49546 Hc:uy UpC6tl Sri)\rC'r, Yi& CJ>.,;n Fred~rid: p.-..lt, r'IJI~AJ~ S. t1prDn Found;~rlt'lfl Am;au:.b V:m Owen.• .l"«7T'ell7 Mille<, unlkld. Pndd""k :ill<~ Sl""<· l'.LC Pblllip H . Pr:<m, :r"''"''"' ~ Srt"'WArr Mur. f''ftUrtJ-..,ivlt Rt.lkn S. CDLli.t.•r. l 8t'lllf,J.,t r.ncn<"if n()lli.r;W.::.u ll,NnJc.tiom: Sn"' n 1<.. lircJm;ul :ict.,_.J..:~ F~umb.tivt• ('.nrnfint' fi. C:barnJxti evn\~tiC~ C.:~lil·:~~hl.- Fnirnd~K~Inl Jull• C.nllao CnliN !:o~rinn 'J1l0n"US B. Cvolc C".ook l'wnilr n ...,d.uion DowidO. l'.s:na H""""J•· Wo:bl-,..· l'ooadotkol We are providing this letter in connectioo with your audit(s) of the sta.tement(s) of financial position of Council of Michigan Foundations as of March 31, 2008 and the relatC<i statements of activities, and cash flows for the year(s) then ended for the purpose of expressing an opinion as to wheth~r the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the respective fmancial position, chm1ges in net assets, and cash tlows of the Council of Michigan Foundations in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. We confirm that we are responsible for the fair presentation in the financial statements of frnancial position, changes in net assets, and cash flows in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in tht: United States of America.. We are also responsible for adopting sound accounting policies, establishing and maintaining effective internal control, and preventing and detecting fraud . l'i.ov.J. Lnuls l'tl""' Klllllmu•uo QommWlity l'oundM.inn R...,-..tiL.G;biot INiD,l; ~- Oilrnilrc ~auu~.u.i~'ltl We confirm, to the best of our knowledge and belief, as of May 19,2008, the following representations made to you during your aud!t. l\llan D . Gilm<>:u Ce:nl'l"'l'''~'l(y 1-'ounduthm rur S.:.,~ht~t Mie:hit:-'ft ). The financial statements referred to above are fairly presented in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted io the United States of America and include all assets and liabilities under the Organization's control. 2. We have made avajlable to you all- C..'OJ A.O""' T11t ~.o(iUtrw~n fmlnd;a!~~o~r• Wo<Jcy ~1. M"""'''·J • ~tlcicinu h~ ('.Atnmuniqt ~lPuAdliCion lll!lll..,fl (l. jlbwbt CMr 1\dvl<ory Oohln« .81och.l P.U..• I Ilam ;uki l\ri110 l)r;Vri~~ f ;llit.ily r,,~l'ldacian O.Vid 1.{. P._., a. F'inancial records and related da.ta_ b. Minutes of the meetings of Board of Directo~ or summaries of actions of recent meetings for which minutes have not yet been prepared. Tho j,..;,b futtd C.UOJ t'l'...M\C'-Mr(~,"un l'oinC' fo.ul nlr r:.,...n~dcm ) 'f.lmN ~. Pnr«r Puett~ F.:no.Hy fau1il!.1ciN"i 0..•1~ S. .sd:oos~'" 11oc: ~'-tlon f<>undoriun 3. G.:o.ld K. Smir~ ~~mit" Vouch l-'CJUfl~IUion There have been no communications from regulatory agencies concerning noncompllance with, or deficiencies in, financial reporting practices. S<orli•s"- Sf'<lrn W.K. K.!lot:<; l'<o"n<lc.cion M'•rs.ucr g.. 'l,nun~n .H.uq A. wtal Mlrr)!l:oln:t D, "roW:(ley fowW~:nn Cbri.u:i~n A. VdllAtlnt"t M id land ALW Gnnm&&aitr •'f·ltnda.rhJn 4. There are no material transactions that have not been properly recorded in the accounting records underlying the financial statements. DMiriJ. W)lllnt ttclw.ud t..,r...lll' r"nmcl:n r~ UwtdJ. Y.o Wk~i\tt'••lln\c M:::mod<\1 J:'o,,n.r.:Jo.ti.on Main Offi ce: One Svurh H:trbor A>~c, ~u icc _}, Gund Ilnvcn, Ml 49117 p 6 16.84 2.7090 f 61 t;.R42.1760 Southea.<t .MicbJg:an Ot'fico;: l nn Tahnl Cenrrc D riv<, Su ire !50, J.)emJit. Ml 4·1i107 p ,; 13.}66.244·1 f ) 1). 566 .2445 www. m ichlJ: nn rrm r'Jac ion.s .or!= �Rehmann Robson May 19, 2008 Page 2 of4 5. We believe the effects of the uncorrected financial statement misstatementS summarized in the att!iChed schedule are immaterial, both individually and in the aggregate, to the financial statements taken as a whole. 6. We acknowledge o ur responsibility for the design and implementation of programs and controls to prevent and detect fraud. 7. We have no knowledge of any fraud or suspected fraud affecting the Organization involving: a. Management, b. Employees who have significant roles in internal control, or c. Others where the fraud could have a material effect on the financial statements. 8. We have no knowledge of any allegations of fraud or suspected fraud affecting the Organization received in commwtications from employees, former employees, analysts, regulators, or others. 9. The Organization has no plans or intentions that may materially affect the carrying value or classification of assets, liabilities, or net asset balances. I 0. The following, if aoy, have been properly recorded or disclo~d in the financial statements: a. Related party transactions, including revenues, expenses, loans, transfers, leasing arrangements, and guarantees, and :amounts receivable from or payable to related parties_ For the purposes of this letter, relat-ed parties mean affiliated or financially interrelated Clrganiz.ations; e ntities for which investments are accounted for by the equity method by the organization; trusts fur the bene fit of employees, such as pension trusts that are managed by or under the trusteeship of management or the governing board; members of the organization' s mana~:,rement and governing board and their immediate families; and otb.er parties with which the organization may deal if one party controls or can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the other to an extent that one of the 1ransacting parties might be prevented from fully pursuing its own separate interests.• such as significant contributors. Another party also is a related party if it can significantly influence the management or operating policies of the transacting parties or if it has an ownership interest in one of the transacting parties and can significantly influence the other to an extent that one or more of the transacting parties might be prevented from :fully pursuing its own separate interests. Additional related parties may include certain national and local affiliates and a separate entity with officers or di rectors also on the nonprofit organization's ~oveming board. b. Guarantees, whether written or oral, under which the Organization is contingently liable. c. A ll accounting estimates that could be materio.l to the financilll statements, including the key factors and significant assumpt ions underlying those estimates, and we beliove the estimares are reasonable in the circumstances. �Rehmann Robson May 19,2008 Page 3 of4 I I. There are no estimates that may be subject to a materia.! change in the near tenn that have not been properly disclosed in the financial statements. We underst:<tnd that near tenn means the period within one year of the date of the financial statements. In addition, we have no knowledge of concentrations existing at the date of the financial statements that make the Organization vulnerable to the risk of severe impact that have not been properly disclosed in the frnaocia.l statements. 12. We are responsible for compliance with the laws, regulations, and provisions of contracts and grant agreements applicable to us; and we have identified and disclosed to you all laws, regulations and provisions of contracts and grant agreements that we believe have a direct and material effect on the detcm1ination of financial statement amounts, or other financial data significant to the audit objectives. 13. Council of Michigan Foundations is an exempt organization under SeGtion 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code, Any activities of which we are aware that would jeopardize the OrgaJ'Iization' s taX-exempt status, and all activities subject to tax. on unrelated business income or excise or other tax. have been disclosed to you. All required filings with tax authorities are up-to- date. l4. There are noa. Violations or possible violations of Jaws &nd regulations and provisions of contracts and grant agreements whose effectS should be considered for disclosure in the financial statements, as a basis for recording a loss contingency, or tor reporting on noncompliance. b. We are not aware of any pending or threatened litigation, claims, or assessments or uoasserted claims or assessments that arc required to be accrued. or disclosed in the financial statements in accordanc:e with Fina ncial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Statement No. S, and we have not consulted a lawyer concerning litjgation, claims, or assessments. c. Other liabilities or gain or loss contingencies that are required to be accrued or disclosed byFASB Statement No. 5. d. Designations of net assets disclosed to you that were not properly authorized and approved, or reclassifications of net assets that have not been properly reflected in the financial statements. 15. The Organization has satisfactory title to all owned assets, and there are no liens o r encumbrances on such assets nor has any asset been pledged. 16. We have complied with all restrictions on resources (including donor restrictions) and aJJ a~pects of contractual and gram agreements that would have a material effect on the financial statements in the event of noncompliance. This includes complying with donor requirements to mailltain a specific asset composition necessary to satisfy their restrictions. �Rehmann Robson May 19,2008 Page 4 of4 No events have occurred subsequent to the statement of financial position date and through the date of this le~ ~ustment to, or disclosure in the financial statements. #~ s;;t'~~f~ Signature Title Title �COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS AND SUPPORTING ORGANIZATIONS GRAND HAVEN, MICHIGAN CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION FOR THE YEARS ENDED MARCH 31, 2008 AND 2007 ~4 REHMANN ROBSON Certified Public Accountants �Council of Michigan F oundations and Supporting Organizations Table of Contents PAGE Independent Auditors' R eport Consolidated Financial Statements for t he Years E nded March 31, 2008 and 2007 Consolidated Statements of Financial Position Consolidated Statements of Activities Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 2 3-4 5 6-15 Supplementary Information for the Years Ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 Consolidating Statements of Financial Position 16-19 Consolidating Statements of Activities 20-27 Indep endent Auditors' R eport on Internal C ontrol over Financial R eporting and on Compliance and Other Matters Based on an Audit of Financial Statements P erformed in Accordance with Government A uditing S tandards 28-29 �REHMANN ROBSON Certified A member of T H E Public Accountants RE HMA NN GROU P INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT May 19, 2008 Board of Directors Council of Michigan Foundations Grand Haven, Michigan We have audited the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position of the Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations as of March 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of activities and cash flows for the years then ended. These consolidated financia l statements are the responsibility of the Organization's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America, and the standards applicable to financia l audits contained in Government Auditing Standards issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions. In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations as of March 31, 2008 a nd 2007, and their changes in net assets and cash flow s for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles gene rally accepted in the United States of America. In accordance with Government Auditing Standards, we have also issued our report dated May I 9, 2008 on our consideration of Council of Michigan Foundations' internal control over financial reporting and our tests of its compliance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements and other matters. The purpose of that report is to describe the scope of our testing of internal control over financial reporting and compliance and the results of that testing, and not to provide an opinion on the internal control over financial reporting or on compliance. That report is an integral part of an audit performed in accordance with Government Auditing Standards and should be considered in assessing the results of our audit. The supplementary information on pages 16 through 27 is presented fo r purposes of additional analysis and is not a required part of the basic financia l statements. T he information has been subjected to the auditing procedures applied in the audit of the basic financial state ments and, in our opinion, is fairly stated in all material respects in relation to the basic financial statements for the years ended March 3 1, 2008, 2007 and 2006 taken as a w hole. ~ ilnndepenllentmember~tf BAKE R TILLY -12330 East Paris Avenue, SE •P.O. Box 6547 • Grand Rapids, Ml 495 16 • 6 16.975.4 100 • Fax 6 16.975.4400 • www.rehmann.com INTERNATIONAL �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Consolidated Statements of Financial Position March 31 2008 2007 Assets Cash and cash equivalents Investments Grants and contributions receivable Prepaid expenses and other assets Property and equipment, net $ 13,650,242 20,236,904 5,942,594 85,866 406,743 $ 15,832,6 11 20,296,232 13,083,58 1 79,637 456,683 T otal assets $ 40,322,349 $ 49,748,744 Liabilities and net assets Liabilities Accounts payable Grants payable Other liabilities $ $ 287,464 20,500 94,832 T otal liabilities Net assets Unrestricted Undesignated Board designated: Community Foundation Endowment Fund Community Foundation Technology Fund CMF Core Services Endowment Fund Total unrestricted Temporarily restricted Permanently restricted T otal net assets Total liabilities and net assets 355,093 1,4 14,500 364,091 2,133,684 402,796 3,651,479 3,927,4 19 8,580,767 543,3 12 575,651 8,756,546 568,371 13,351,209 16,745,303 8,092, 153 13,252,336 28,001,459 8,092,153 38,188,665 49,345,948 $ 40,322,349 $ 49,748,744 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined fi nancial statements. -2- �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Consolidated Statement of Activities Unrestricted Support and revenue Member contributions Grant support Conferences Publications Other income Investment income, net of fees Net unrealized and realized losses on investments Net assets released from restriction $ For The Year E nded March 31, 2008 Temporarily Permanently R estricted Restricted 1,001,918 350,538 427,103 28,964 15,195 1,431,994 $ (7 ,656) 1,999,399 107,650 $ Total $ 760,448 994,262 2,349,937 534,753 28,964 15, 195 2, 192,442 (846,923) 13,195,841 (920, 156) (13, 195,841) ( 1, 767 ,079) Total support and r evenue 15,604,630 (11,256,156) 4,348,474 Expenses Grants Conferences Publications Fundraising Professional fees Depreciation Programming/administrative 10,652,318 635,964 110,785 136,082 1,226,963 12 1,941 2,621,704 10,652,3 18 635,964 110,785 136,082 1,226,963 121 ,941 2,621,704 Total expenses 15,505,757 15,505,757 Change in net assets Net assets, beginning of year Net assets, end of year 98,873 (11,157,283) (11,256,156) 13,252,336 28,001 ,459 $ 13,351 ,209 $ 16,745,303 $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements. -3- 8,092, 153 49,345,948 8,092,153 $ 38,188,665 �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Consolidated Statement of Activities Unrestricted Support and revenue Member contributions Grant support Conferences Publications Other income Investment income, net of fees Net unrealized and realized gains on investments Net assets released from restriction Total support and r evenue Expenses Grants Conferences Publications Fundraising Professional fees Depreciation Programming/administrative Total expenses Change in net assets Net assets, beginning of year Net assets, end of year $ For The Year E nded March 31, 2007 Temporarily Permanently Restricted Restricted $ 949,387 489,375 4 13,817 72,542 5,6 18 1,153,416 63,655 22,48 1, 192 152,505 $ T otal $ 471 ,464 1,0 13,042 22,970,567 566,322 72,542 5,618 1,624,880 524,728 12,277, 107 619,933 (12,277, I 07) 1, 144,661 15,885,990 11,511,642 27,397,632 9,788,975 564,307 17 1,154 157,883 I ,043,795 159,800 2,707,430 9,788,975 564,307 17 1, 154 157,883 I ,043,795 159,800 2,707,430 14,593,344 14,593,344 1,292,646 11 ,511,642 11 ,959,690 16,489,8 17 $ 13,252,336 $ 28,001,459 12,804,288 $ The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined financial statements. -4- 8,092, 153 36,541 ,660 8,092,153 $ 49,345,948 �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For The Year Ended March 31 2007 2008 Cash flows from operating activities Change in net assets Adjustments to reconci le change in net assets to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: Realized and unrealized losses (gains) on investments Loss on the sale of property and equipment Depreciation Changes in assets and liabilities which provided (used) cash: Grants and contributions receivable Prepaid expenses and other assets Accounts payable Grants payable Other liabilities $ (1 1, 157,283) Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities $ 12,804,288 1,767,079 5,366 12 1,941 (1,144,661) 6,757 159,800 7, 140,987 (6,229) 67,629 1,394,000 269,259 (9,930,7 16) (9,541) 160,809 (339,375) (48,642) (397,251) 1,658,719 Cash flows from investing activities Purchases of property and equipment Purchases of investments Proceeds from sale of investments Proceeds from sale of property and equipment (77,367) (7,992,970) 6,285,219 (118,806) (5,130, 165) 1,290,006 6,689 Net cash used in investing activities {1 ,785,11 8) {),952,276} Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents (2,182,369) (2,293,557) 15,832,611 18,126, 168 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year Cash and cash equivalents, end of year $ 13,650,242 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these combined fi nancial statements. -5- $ 15,832,611 �Council of Michigan F oundations and Supporting Organizations Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICI ES Organization ami Consolidation The Council of Michigan Foundations ("CMF"), an association of foundations and corporations making grants for charitable purposes, was incorporated in 1975 to enhance, improve and increase philanthropy in Michigan. The Midwest Community Foundations' Ventures ("MCFV"), the Michigan AIDS Fund ("MAF") and Learning to Give ("LTG") are Type I supporting organizations of CMF under the provisions of Internal Revenue Code section 509(a)(3). The accompanying financial statements of CMF have bee n prepared on a consolidated basis to include its supporting organizations. CMF's Board of Trustees exercises significant control over these organizations through the appointment of board members. References to the "Organization" refer to the consolidated group. Basis of Presentation The Organization reports information regarding its financial position and activities according to three classes of net assets depending on the existence or absence of donor-imposed restrictions: unrestricted net assets, temporarily restricted net assets and permanently restricted net assets. Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents consist of checking accounts and money market funds, which are carried at fair value. The Organization maintains demand deposits in banks, and in the normal course of business, amounts may exceed federally insured limits. Management believes the Organization is not exposed to any significant interest rate or other financial risk on these deposits. In vestm ents Investments are carried at estimated fa ir value, using quoted market prices. Net realized gains and losses and unrealized increases or decreases resulting from changes in the market value of investments are included in the consolidated statements of activities and changes in net assets. The realized gain or loss on the sale of investments is the difference between the proceeds received and the cost of specific investments sold. Property and Equipment and Depreciation Property and equipment are stated at estimated fair value at the date donated or at cost if purchased. Such donations are reported as unrestricted support unless the donor has restricted the donated asset to a specific purpose. Major improvements are capitalized while ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed. Management annually reviews these assets to determine whether carrying values have been impaired. Depreciation is computed by the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. -6- �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Grants Payable Grants are recognized as an expense when approved by the governing boards of CMF and its supporting organizations if unconditional, or when the related conditions are met by the recipient, if conditional. Grants payable recorded in the accompanying consolidated statements of financial position are generally expected to be paid within one year. As of March 31 , 2008 and 2007, CMF had $ 14,893,395 and $13, 146,880, respectively, in grant awards, for which related conditions have not been met by the intended recipients. Net Asset Classifications The net asset groups used for reporting purposes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements are as follows : Unrestricted Net Assets- Consist of contributed assets that have not been restricted as to use by donors. Certain of these assets have been designated by the governing boards of CMF and its supporting organizations to be used for a specific purpose. These board-designated funds include investment income earned on MCFV Challenge grant assets that will be used to fu nd community foundation programming and technical assistance. Temporarily Restricted Net Assets- Consist of contributed assets for which the use by CMF and its supporting organizations has been limited by donors for a specific time period or purpose. Permanently Restricted Net Assets- Consist of contributions with donor-imposed restrictions that do not expire and that allow, in certain cases, only the income earned thereon to be expended. Income earned that is restricted for a period of time or purpose is recorded as a temporarily restricted net asset. Grant Support Grant support includes contributions from federal and private sources. Grant support received is recorded as unrestricted, temporarily, or permanently restricted support depending on the existence and/or nature of any donor restrictions. A ll grant support is considered to be available for unrestricted use unless specifically restricted by the donor. When a donor restriction expires, that is when a stipulated time restriction ends or purpose restriction is accomplished, temporarily restricted net assets are reclassified to unrestricted net assets and reported in the statement of activities as net assets released from restrictions. Contributions ami Un conditional Promises to Give Contributions received are recorded as unrestricted, temporarily restricted or pennanently restricted support depending on the existence and/or nature of any donor restrictions. Unconditional promises to give are recognized as revenues in the period the promises are received. Contributions that are restricted by the donor are reported as increases in unrestricted net assets if the restrictions expire in the year in which the contributions are received. All other donor-restricted contributions are reported as increases in temporarily or permanently restricted net assets depending on the nature of the restrictions. When a restriction has been satisfied or expires, temporarily restricted net assets are reclassified to unrestricted net assets. -7- �Council of Michigan F oundations and Supporting Organizations Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Use of Estim ates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Income Taxes CMF and its supporting organizations, LTG, MCFV and MAF, are not-for-profit organizations exempt from income taxes under Section 50 I (c )(3) of the Internal Revenue Code and are also exempt from similar state and local taxes. Un employment Claims As a nonprofit organization, CMF has the option of paying for unemployment claims on a reimbursement basis versus making quarterly payments to the Michigan Bureau of Workers & Unemployment Compensation pool. In November 2005, CMF established a policy of self-fu nding possible claims by establishing an accrual based on the current rate for new employers provided by the Michigan Bureau of Workers & Unemployment Compensation. The balance of this accrual at March 31, 2008 and 2007 was $3 1,000 and $53,000, respectively. 2. SUPPORTING ORGANI ZATIONS Midwest Community Foundations' Ventures In November 1993, the Midwest Community Foundations Ventures (MCFV) was incorporated under the name of the Michigan Community Foundations' Youth Project {MCFYP), as a supporting organization of the Council of Michigan Foundations. The main purpose o f MCFYP was to administer theW .K. Kellogg Foundation Youth Challenge grant program. As the need for community fo undations to collaborate more on a regional basis became apparent, MCFV was re-purposed in October 2005 to support collaborative activities by community foundations in Michigan, Ohio, Indiana and Illinois that will contribute to growth in assets, economies of scale, and meeting and maintaining national standards. MCFV has a separate board of trustees appointed by CMF's Board of Trustees to oversee their grantmaking and programming activities. Michigan AIDS Fund CMF formed the Michigan AIDS Fund (MAF) for the purpose of managing a collaborative funding grant program previously administered by CMF. This program acts as a vehicle for CMF members and others to cooperatively fund AIDS-related projects in Michigan. MAF was incorporated in November 1993, with a separate board of trustees appointed by CMF, to oversee the growing activities and grant-making responsibilities of this program. -8- �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Learning to Give Launched in 1997 by the Council of Michigan Foundations, with funding from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation and the Lilly Endowment, the primary purpose of Learning to Give (LTG) is to educate youth, ages 5-18, about the independent sector and developing giving and volunteering skills through free teacher developed and tested lesson plans about philanthropy and volunteerism, which can be accessed at www.learningtogive.org. LTG has since expanded to work with colleges of education on teacher training. Although the work of this project has primarily foc used in Michigan and Indiana, LTG became a supporting organization of the Council of Michigan Foundations on November I , 2004, with the purpose of expanding both nationally and internationally. On March 2, 2006, LTG signed a licensing agreement with a New Jersey based nonprofit tax-exempt organization called the LEAGUE, that has developed a model for schools to compete through a system of points received for volunteer services provided by students throughout the year. In the summer of 2006, the LTG staff was hired by the LEAGUE to provide the training and curriculum that will help insert volunteerism and philanthropy into the LEAGUE's activities occurring throughout the year. LTG current holds two major grants from the Lilly Endowment and W.K. Kellogg Foundation that are being used to support the combined work of LTG and the LEAGU E. 3. ENDOWMENT FUNDS CMF maintains eleven endowment funds. The principal amounts of eight of these funds have been permanently restricted by their donors, whereas the investment income earned on the assets of these funds is either temporarily restricted for the stated purpose of the fund or unrestricted: Russell G. Mawby Endowment Fund to Improve and Increase Philanthropy The Russell G. Mawby Endowment Fund to Improve and Increase Philanthropy was established during 1995 to honor Dr. Mawby's contributions to Michigan philanthropy. Dr. Mawby, former Chairman and CEO of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, was one of the founders of the Council of Michigan Foundations and served as its first chairman in 1972. The purpose of this Fund is to improve and increase philanthropy by continuing and expanding CMF's efforts to enhance philanthropy and increase charitable resources. Ruth & Russ Mawby Fund for Kids In December of 1995, the W .K. K ellogg Foundation contributed $500,000 to set up the Ruth a nd Russ Mawby Fund For Kids, with the expressed purpose of improving and increasing philanthropy through youth involvement in the State of Michigan. William W. Allen Endowment Fund The purpose of this Fund is to further the understanding of private philanthropy in federal and state legislative and regulatory matters. The endowment was established with restricted contributions from the member foundations of CMF given in honor of a former CMF board member who was also the first Government Relations chairman. -9- �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Dorothy A. Johnson Educational Fund In 1999, the Dorothy A. Johnson Educational Fund was established to honor the founding President and CEO of the Council of Michigan Foundations for her 25 years of service to philanthropy and volunteerism in Michigan and nationwide. The purpose of this fund is to support two objectives: speakers for CMF's Annual Conference, and specialized educational seminars for CMF members. Michigan Community Foundations' Youth Project Endowment Fund In April 2001, the CMF Board of Trustees established the Michigan Community Foundations' Youth Project Endowment Fund through a $1,055,505 contribution from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation. Previously, these funds were restricted by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation for the challenge grant program. With the program objectives nearing completion, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation approved the transfer of the remaining Challenge grant donation of $ 1,055,505 to the Michigan Community Foundation Youth Project Endowment Fund. The purpose of this fu nd is to provide technical assistance to the 86 community foundation youth advisory committees throughout Michigan that were established through the Kellogg Youth Challenge program. Margaret Ann Riecker Leadership Fund In recognition of 26 years of service as a founding Trustee and Chair of the Council of Michigan Foundations, the Margaret Ann Reicker Leadership Fund was esta blished in September of 2002. This fund will be used to support CMF 's leade rship role in increasing, enhancing and improving philanthropy in Michigan. William C. Richardson Endowment Fund In recognition of former W.K. K ellogg Foundation CEO Dr. William C. Richardson' s service to philanthropy in Michigan and his leadersh ip in advancing the engagement of philanthropy in public policy, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation made a $400,000 gift to establish this fund. The purpose of this Fund is to support the ongoing involvement in an intem /fellowship role at CMF by students from Michigan colleges or universities, who are interested in careers involving the nonprofit sector and public policy. Carl F. Reitz Fund for Investment Education In recognition of Mr. Reitz's long time service to C MF and philanthropy in Michigan, the Besser Foundation made a $25,000 gift to establish this fund which was matched by $25,000 from CMF. The purpose of this fund is to support ongoing investment education opportunities for Foundation staff and trustees. -10- �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Market Value March 31 2008 2007 CMF Endowment Funds Russell G. Mawby Endowment Fund to Improve and Increase Philanthropy Ruth & Russ Mawby Fund for Kids William W. Allen Endowment Fund Dorothy A. Johnson Educational Fund Michigan Community Foundations' Youth Project Endowment Fund Margaret Ann Riecker Leadership Fund William C. Richardson Endowment Fund Carl F. Reitz Fund for Investment Education $ 1,737,414 1,009,981 202,292 1,151 ,574 $ 1,819,686 1,044,771 2 12,484 1,207,662 1,380,441 1,371 ,052 431,484 53,835 1,425,335 1,436,583 456,336 56,959 The principal amounts of the follow ing funds have been set aside on the statement of net assets as board designated funds: Board Designated - Community Foundation Endowment Fund On October 12, 1995, the Michigan Community Foundations' Youth Project (MCFYP), now known as the Midwest Community Foundations' Ventures (MCFV), Board of Trustees established the Community Foundation Endowment Fund from the interest earned on the grant dollars recei ved from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation to establish the Kellogg Youth Challenge. In October 1999, MCFYP transferred this fund to the Council of Michigan Foundations. Board Designated - Community Foundation Technology Fund In February 2003, the CMF Board of Trustees established the Community Foundation Technology Fund from the accumulated interest earnings and repaid loans from the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Computer Grant in accordance with the original grant proposal. The purpose of this fund will be to help support the ongoing technology needs of community foundations in Michigan. Board Designated- CMF Core Services Endowment Fund In May 2007, $600,000 was transferred from the accumulated core services surplus fund balance to establish this fund . The purpose of this fund is to support and enhance the core services provided to CMF members. Market Value March 31 2008 2007 Board Designated -Community Foundation Endowment Fund Community Foundation Technology Fund CMF Core Services Endowment Fund -11- $8,580,767 543,312 575,651 $8,756,546 568,371 �Council of Michigan F oundations and Supporting Organizations Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Learning to Give maintains one endowment fund . Learning to Give Endowment Fund In February 2006, the W.K. Kellogg Foundation awarded a $3 million endowment grant that will be used to secure the work of Learning to Give in defining and creating school-based K-12 philanthropy education by teaching children in schools and youth organizations the concept about giving their time, talent, and treasure for the common good. The fund had a market value of $3,082,509 and $3,330,4 13 as of March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. 4. I NVESTMENTS Investments are presented in the Consolidated financial statements at their aggregate market value and are composed of the following at March 3 I: 2007 2008 Cost Market Cost Market Equity investments Fixed income investments $10,865,970 5,046, 108 $ 15, 154,286 5,082,618 $11 ,171,439 6,036,936 $1 4, 189,925 6, 106,307 T otal $15,912,078 $20,236,904 $17,208,375 $20,296,232 5. GRANTS AND CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVABLE CMF recognizes pledges from donors as revenue when they become unconditional. An unconditional promise represents a promise made by grantors/donors to give specified amounts to CMF in the fumre which are not contingent on CMF performing any specific substantive actions (e.g., raising matching amounts). Multi-year pledges expected to be collected in more than one year are discounted to present value of future cash flows. Management believes that all grants and contributions receivable will be fully collected. CMF's grants and contributions receivable consist of unconditional promises by donors to be received as follows as of March 31: 2008 2007 Less present value discount (at 5.25%) $5,757,546 195,000 5,952,546 9,952 $ 8, 154,630 5,365,980 13,520,610 437,029 Total $5,942,594 $13,083,581 Receivable in less than one year Receivable in one to five years The majority of the grants and contributions receivable represent funds that will be regranted to other tax exempt not-for-profit public charities in future years. -12- �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT Property and equipment is summarized as fo llows at March 31 : 2008 2007 Less accumulated depreciation $ 482,704 824,365 172,405 1,479,474 1,072,731 $ 482,704 874,604 175,215 1,532,523 1,075,840 Total $ 406,743 $ 456,683 Buildings Equipment Furnishings 7. LEASES Council of Michigan Foundations leases office space in Detroit under operating lease agreements which expire on March 31, 2009. The Organization also leases other space under a month-to-month lease agreement w ith monthly payments of $ 1,700. The Organization leases an automobile and a copier under lease agreements which expire in April 2009 and April 2012, respectively. Total rentals paid during the years ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 on these leases totaled approximately $70,000 and $71,000, respectively. The following is a schedule of annual future minimum lease payments required under operating leases with initial or remaining noncancelable lease terms in excess of one year as of March 3 1, 2008: Year Amount 2009 2010 2011 2012 $ 42,099 Total minimum payments due $ 50,919 2,940 2,940 2,940 -13- �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 8. RESTRICTED NET ASSETS Temporarily restricted net assets consist of the following at March 31 : 2008 C MF Tobacco Settlement Individual Development Accounts Technology Project Foundation Liaison CMF Endowment Funds Infrastructure Support Detroit Office Support Early Childhood Diversity & Inclusiveness Miscellaneous Total CMF $ MCFV Kellogg Youth Initiative Partnership Access to Recreation Miscellaneous Total MCFV MAF Public Policy Mpowennent Miscellaneous Total MAF LTG Lilly Endowment Fund Support LTG Kellogg LTG Endowment Fund M isce11aneous Total LTG Total -14- 152,946 7,483 50,623 146,933 2,179,984 292,344 25,000 3,060,500 141 ,292 244,905 6,302,010 2007 $ 152,946 133,074 12 1,430 434,784 2,503,026 450,000 50,000 4,213,907 106,066 8,165,233 4,74 1,580 4,696,685 5 1,605 9,489,870 6,456,130 10,954,694 99 180 17l510,004 2,092 69,267 39,746 llll105 64,061 155,684 5 1,573 271l318 34,809 725,000 82,509 842l318 343,242 1,38 1,250 318,947 11 ,465 2l054l904 $16z745z303 $28z001z459 �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements Permanently restricted net assets, which are held in the various endowment funds as disclosed in note 3, consist of the following at March 31, 2008 and 2007: CMF Russell G. Mawby Endowment Fund to Improve and Increase Philanthropy Ruth & Russ Mawby Fund for Kids William W. Allen Endowment Fund Dorothy A. Johnson Educational Fund Michigan Community Foundations' Youth Project Endowment Fund Margaret Ann Riecker Leadership Fund William C. Richardson Endowment Fund Carl F. Reitz Fund for Investment Education Total CMF LTG Learning to Give Endowment $ 1,0 12,893 502,609 70,537 983,127 1,055,505 1,0 17,482 400,000 50,000 5,092,153 3,000,000 Total $ 8,092,153 9. ANNUITY PLAN CMF has established a tax-deferred annuity plan that covers substantially all employees and enables eligih le employees to contrihute :l portion of their s:Jlary to the p lan, suhject to an annual limitation as prescribed by federal tax regulations. CMF also contributes, for the benefit of each employee, an amount equal to 8% of each eligible employee's salary, plus an additional dollar for dollar match up to 2% of the eligible employee's annual salary. CMF recognized contribution expense of $131 ,593 in 2008 and $ 137,464 in 2007 related to the p lan. 10. MANAGEMENT SERVICES AGREEMENT CMF provides accounting and administrative services to the Michigan AIDS Fund. The revenues and related expenses for these services charged to MAF are eliminated in the preparation of the consolidated financial statements. 11. RESTATEMENT For the year ended March 3 1, 2007, grant support revenue and grant expense for the Michigan Aids Fund were increased by $119,075 to properly reflect the payment of stipends to Americorps program employees by the National Aids Fund. Inclusion of these stipends is necessary to report the total actual cost of running this program. Because these stipends were actually paid by a third party supporter of the program, they were recorded as an expense and offsetting revenue. ***** -15- �SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Consolidating Statement of Financial Position March 31 , 2008 (with comparative totals as of March 31, 2007) Council of Michigan Foundations Assets Cash and cash equivalents Investments Grants and contributions receivable Due from other funds Prepaid expenses and other assets Property and equipment, net Total assets Liabilities and net assets Liabilities Accounts payable Grants payable Due to other funds Other liabilities $ 8,336 3,079,344 $ 940,050 6,452,028 4,662,699 77, 104 397,784 1,987 $ 29,789,523 $ $ 355,093 1,342,500 5,226,895 330,091 $ Total liabilities 4,027,730 $ 11 ,11 6,714 $ 7,254,579 Net assets Unrestricted U ndesignated Board designated Community Foundation Endowment Fund Community Foundation Technology Fund CM F Core Services Endowment Fund 1,44 1,05 1 185 ,4 12 1,626,844 11 , 140,78 1 6,302,0 10 5,092, 153 185,4 12 842,3 18 3,000,000 1,626,844 9,489,870 22,534,944 4,027,730 11 ,116,714 8,580,767 543,3 12 575,651 Total unrestricted Temporarily restricted Permanently restricted Total net assets Total liabilities and net assets 6,573,703 17, 157,560 5,583,372 $ Learning to G ive M idwest Community Foundations' Ventures $ 29,789,523 - 16- $ 4,027,730 $ 11 ,116,714 �Michigan AIDS Fund $ 616, 175 Consolidated Elimination s $ 2008 $ 359,222 13,650,242 20,236,904 5,942,594 2007 $ 15,832,6 11 20,296,232 13,083,58 1 (5,602,749) 8,762 6,972 $ 991,131 $ $ (5,602,749) $ 72,000 375,854 34,000 (5,602, 749) 481,854 (5,602,749) $ 40,322,349 $ 49,748,744 $ 355,093 1,41 4,500 $ 287,464 20,500 364,09 1 94,832 2,133,684 402,796 3,65 1,479 3,927,41 9 8,580,767 543,3 12 575,65 1 8,756,546 568,371 398, 172 111 ,105 13,351,209 16,745,303 8,Q92, 153 13,252,336 28,00 1,459 8,092, 153 509,277 38,188,665 49,345,948 398,172 $ 79,637 456,683 85,866 406,743 991,131 $ (5,602,749) $ 40,322,349 $ - 17- 49,748,744 �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Con solidating Statement of Fin ancial Position March 31 , 2007 (with comparative totals as of March 31, 2006) Council of Michigan Foundations Assets Cash and cash equivalents Investments G rants and contributions receivable Due from other funds Prepaid expenses and other assets Property and equipment, net Total assets Liabilities and net assets Liabilities Accounts payable Grants payable Due to other funds Other liabilities $ 35,740 3,288,057 $ 7,403 ,730 11,21 1,070 1,897,725 72,0 16 422,470 18,368 $ 38,095,540 $ $ 287,464 $ 5,221,522 $ 18,633,168 $ 13,007,290 94,832 Total liabilities 13,389,586 Net assets Unrestricted U ndesignated Board designated Community Foundation Endowment Fund Community Foundation Technology Fund 2, 123,65 1 166,6 18 1,123, 164 11 ,448,568 8, 165,233 5,092,153 166,6 18 2,054,904 3,000,000 1,123,164 17,510,004 24,705,954 5,221 ,522 18,633,168 8,756,546 568,371 Total unrestricted Temporarily restricted Permanently restricted Total net assets Total liabilities and net assets 7,805,324 17,008, 175 12,787,555 $ Learning to G ive M idwest Community Foundations' Ventures $ 38,095,540 - 18- $ 5,221,522 $ 18,633,168 �M ichigan AIDS Fund $ 587,8 17 Consolidated Elimination s $ 2007 $ 296,026 15,832,6 11 20,296,232 13,083,58 1 2006 $ 18,126, 168 15,311,412 3,152,865 ( 13,108,795) 7,62 1 15,845 $ 907,309 $ 20,500 101 ,505 $ (13,108,795) $ 49,748,744 $ 37,171,664 $ $ 287,464 20,500 $ 126,655 359,875 ( 13, 108,795) 94,832 143,474 402,796 630,004 3,927,4 19 3,336,41 1 8,756,546 568,37 1 8,097,800 525,479 5 13,986 27 1,3 18 13,252,336 28,001,459 8,092, 153 11 ,959,690 16,489,817 8,092, 153 785,304 49,345,948 36,541,660 122,005 (13, I 08,795) 5 13,986 $ 70,096 5 11 , 123 79,637 456,683 907,309 $ (13,108,795) $ 49,748,744 $ - 19- 37,171,664 �Council of Michigan F oundations and Suppor ting Organizations Consolida ting Statement of Activities For T he Year E nded M arch 31, 2008 (with comparative totals for the year ended March 31, 2007) Unrestricted Supporta nd revenu e Member contributions Grant support Conferences Publications Other income Investment income, net of fees Net unrealized and realized losses on investments Net assets released from restriction $ 1,001 ,9 18 ( 1,753) 427, 103 28,943 4 1,39 1 890, 147 Council of Michigan Foundations Temporarily Permanently Restricted Restricted $ (7,656) 1, 185,431 107,650 $ Total $ 546,024 994,262 I , 183,678 534,753 28,943 41 ,39 1 1,436, 171 (846,923) 3,078,843 (6 15,829) (3,078,843) ( 1,462,752) Total support and r evenue 4,619,669 ( 1,863,223) 2,756,446 Exp enses Grants Conferences Publications Fund raising Professional fees Depreciation Programming/administrative I ,539,289 584,979 I 07,089 56,849 629,830 96,687 1,907,273 I ,539,289 584,979 107,089 56,849 629,830 96,687 I ,907,273 Tot.a l expen ses 4,921 ,996 4,921,996 Deficien cy of revenues under expenses Transfers C ha nge in net assets Net assets, beginning of year Net assets, end of year (302,327) ( 1,863,223) (2, 165,550) (5,460) (307,787) (5,460) ( 1,863,223) (2, 171 ,0 10) I I ,448,568 8, 165,233 5,092, 153 24,705,954 $ 11,140,781 $ 6,302,0 10 $ 5,092, 153 $ 22,534,944 -20- �Unrestricted Lea rning to Give T empor a rily Per ma nen tly Restricted Restricted $ $ $ M idwest Com m unity Foundations' Ventures Temp orarily Un restricted Restricted Total $ $ 21 21 21 21 27,292 214,424 (304,327) ( I, 122,683) (304,327) 1,150,017 ( I ,212,586) $ 482,839 8,000 496,666 241,7 16 1,122,683 $ 31,529 5 14,368 8,000 496,666 8,502,973 (8,502,973) (62,569) 9,039, 168 (8,020, 134) 8 14,250 4,293 8 14,250 4,293 7,915,204 9,234 7,915,204 9,234 1,58 1 I ,581 3 11,099 3 11,099 486,229 16,38 1 113,900 486,229 16,381 113,900 1,131,223 1, 13 1,223 8,540,948 8,540,948 18,794 (1, 193,792) ( I ,2 12,586) 498,220 (8,020, 134) 5,460 $ T otal 18,794 ( I ,2 12,586) 166,61 8 2,054,904 3,000,000 5,22 1,522 842,3 18 $ 3,000,000 $ 4,027,730 185,412 $ (1, 193,792) 503,680 $ I ,019,034 (7,52 1,9 14) 5,460 (8,020, 134) (7 ,5 16,454) 1, 123, 164 17,5 10,004 18,633,168 I ,626,844 $ 9,489,870 $ 11, 116,7 14 Continued ... -2 1- �Council of Michigan F oundations a nd Supporting Organizations Consolidating Statement of Activities (Concluded) For The Year Ended March 31, 2008 (with compar ative totals for the year ended March 31 , 2007 Michigan AIDS Fund Temporarily Restricted Unrestricted Supportandrevenue Member contributions G rant support Conferences Publications Other income Investment income, net of fees Net unrealized and realized losses on investments Net assets released from restriction $ $ 320,741 Total $ 331 , 129 Eliminations $ 651,870 (34, 196) 17,889 17,889 491,342 (491,342) Total support and revenue 829,972 (160,213) Expenses G rants Conferences Publications Fund raising Professional fees Depreciation Programming/administrative 383,575 37,458 3,696 79,233 119,323 8,873 313,628 383,575 37,458 3,696 79,233 119,323 8,873 313,628 Tot.al expen ses 945,786 945,786 Deficiency of revenues under expenses (34, 196) 669,759 (115,8 14) (160,213) (276,027) C ha nge in net assets (115,814) ( 160,213) (276,027) Net assets, beginning of year 513,986 271 ,318 785,304 (I 0,000) (24, 196) (34, 196) Transfers Net assets, end of year $ 398, 172 -22- $ Ill , 105 $ 509,277 $ �Unrestricted $ 1,001 ,918 350,538 427, 103 28,964 15, 195 I ,431 ,994 Consolidated Temporarily Restricted Permanently Restricted $ $ (7,656) 1,999,399 107,650 Totals 2008 $ 760,448 994,262 2,349,937 534,753 28,964 15,195 2, 192,442 2007 $ I ,0 13,042 22,851 ,492 566,322 72,542 5,6 18 I ,624,880 (846,923) 13,195,841 (920, 156) ( 13,195,841) (1 ,767,079) 1,144,661 15,604,630 ( 11,256, 156) 4,348,474 27,278,557 2,621,704 I 0,652,318 635,964 110,785 136,082 I ,226,963 12 1,94 1 2,621 ,704 9,669,900 564,307 171 , 154 157,883 I ,043,795 159,800 2,707,430 15,505,757 15,505,757 14,474,269 I 0,652,318 635,964 110,785 136,082 1,226,963 121,941 98,873 (1 1,256,156) ( 11,157,283) 12,804,288 98,873 (1 1,256, 156) ( 11, 157,283) 12,804,288 13,252,336 28,001 ,459 8,092, 153 49,345,948 36,54 1,660 $ 13,35 1,209 $ 16,745,303 $ 8,092, 153 $ 38,188,665 $ 49,345,948 -23- �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Consolidating Statement of Activities For The Year Ended March 31, 2007 (with comparative totals for the year ended March 31, 2006) Unrestricted Supporta ndrevenue Member contributions Grant support Conferences Publications Other income Investment income, net of fees Net unrealized and realized gains on investments Net assets released from restriction $ 949,387 6,500 4 13,817 65,452 43,526 564,970 Council of Michigan Foundations Permanently Temporarily Restricted Restricted $ 63,655 7,066,720 152,505 $ Total $ I ,0 13,042 7,073,220 566,322 65,452 43,526 892,734 327,764 969,4 14 524,728 4,751,545 444,686 (4,751 ,545) Total support and revenue 7,319,925 3,303,785 Expenses Grants Conferences Publications Fund raising Professional fees Depreciation Programming/administrative 3,207,900 539,223 166,798 51 ,983 466,089 119,587 I ,987,066 3,207,900 539,223 166,798 51,983 466,089 119,587 I ,987,066 Total expen ses 6,538,646 6,538,646 C ha nge in net assets Net assets, beginning of year Net assets, end of year 10,623,7 10 781,279 3,303,785 I 0,667,289 4,86 1,448 5,092,153 20,620,890 $ I I ,448,568 $ 8,1 65,233 $ 5,092, 153 $ 24,705,954 -24- 4,085,064 �Unrestricted Learning to Give Temporarily Permanently Restricted Restricted $ $ 1,020 7,090 1,776 54,806 $ $ 91,675 92,695 143,700 7,090 1,776 198,506 175,247 (695,508) 175,247 695,508 760,200 (284,886) $ Total $ 14,931 ,66 1 507,714 14,93 1,661 507,7 14 6,54 1,01 7 (6,541 ,0 17) 475,3 14 7,048,73 1 8,390,644 2 18,750 6,296 2,207 2 18,750 6,296 2,207 6, 124,000 1,736 6, 124,000 1,736 85,029 85,029 401 ,207 401 ,207 433, 190 29,4 12 70,621 433,190 29,4 12 70,621 7 13,489 7 13,489 6,658,959 6,658,959 46,71 1 $ $ Total Midwest Community Foundations' Ventures Temporarily Unrestricted Restricted (284,886) (238, 175) 15,439,375 389,772 8,390,644 8,780,416 119,907 2,339,790 3,000,000 5,459,697 733,392 9, 119,360 9,852,752 166,618 $ 2,054,904 $ 3,000,000 $ 5,22 1,522 $ 1, 123, 164 $ 17,5 10,004 $ 18,633, 168 Continued ... -25- �Council of Michigan Foundations and Supporting Organizations Consolidating Statement of Activities (Concluded) For The Year Ended March 31, 2007 (with comparative totals for the year ended March 31, 2006) Michigan AIDS Fund Temporarily Unrestricted Restricted Supporta ndrevenue Member contributions Grant support Conferences Publications Other income Investment income, net of fees Net unrealized and realized gains on investments Net assets released from restriction $ $ 481,855 Total $ 391,136 $ 872,991 (39,684) 25,926 25,926 289,037 (289,037) Total support and revenue 796,818 102,099 Expenses Grants Conferences Publications Fund raising Professional fees Depreciation Programming/administrative 238,325 17,052 2, 149 I 05,900 78,387 10,80 1 269,320 238,325 17,052 2,1 49 105,900 78,387 10,801 269,320 Total expen ses 721,934 721 ,934 898,917 C ha nge in net assets 74,884 I 02,099 176,983 Net assets, beginning of year 439,102 169,2 19 608,32 1 Net assets, end of yea r Eliminations $ -26- 5 13,986 $ 271 ,318 $ 785,304 (39,684) (18,900) (20,784) (39,684) $ �Unrestricted Consolidated Temporarily Restricted Permanently Restricted $ $ $ 949,387 489,375 41 3,817 72,542 5,618 1,153,416 63,655 22,481 , 192 152,505 Totals $ 47 1,464 524,728 12,277,107 619,933 ( 12,277, 107) 15,885,990 11,511,642 2007 I ,013,042 22,970,567 566,322 72,542 5,6 18 I ,624,880 2006 $ I ,6 18,995 10,121 ,585 496,683 30,672 59,209 I ,535,442 1, 144,66 1 9 15,843 27,397,632 14,778,429 9,788,975 564,307 171,154 157,883 I ,043,795 159,800 2,707,430 9,788,975 564,307 17 1, 154 157,883 I ,043,795 159,800 2,707,430 4,883,982 5 15,673 164, 141 125, 166 973,7 15 183,268 3,075,8 10 14,593,344 14 ,593,344 9,92 1,755 12,804,288 4,856,674 1,292,646 11,511 ,642 11,959,690 16,489,8 17 8,092, 153 36,541 ,660 3 1,684,986 $ 13,252,336 $ 28,00 I ,459 $ 8,092, 153 $ 49,345,948 $ 36,541 ,660 -27- �INTERNAL CONTROL AND COMPLIANCE �REHMANN ROBSON Certified A member of T H E Public Accountants RE HMA NN GROU P I NDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT O N INTER NAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL R EPORTING AND ON COMPLIANCE AND OTHER MATTERS BASED ON AN AUDIT OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS P ERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH GOVERNMENT AUDITING STANDARDS May 19,2008 Board of Directors Council of Michigan Foundations Grand Haven, M ichigan We have audited the consolidated financial statements of the Council of Michigan Foundations as of and for the year ended March 3 1, 2008, and have issued our report thereon dated May 19,2008. We conducted o ur audit in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the U nited States of America and the standards applicable to financia l audits contained in Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the Un ited States. Internal Control Over Financial Reporting In planning and performing our audit, we considered the Council of Michigan Foundations' internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing our auditing procedures for the purpose of expressing our opinion on the financial statements, but not for the pu rpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control over financia l reporting. Accordingly, we do not express an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity's internal control over financial reporting. A control deficiency exists when the desig n or operation o f a control does not allow management or employees, in the nonnal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a contro l deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, that adversely affects the entity's ability to initiate, authorize, record, process, or report financ ial data reliably in accordance with generally accepted accounting princ iples such that there is more than a remote likelihood that a misstatement of the entity's financial statements that is more than inconsequential will not be preven ted or detected by the entity 's internal control. A material weakness is a significant deficiency, or combination of significant deficiencies, that results in m ore than a remote likelihood that a material misstatement of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected by the entity's internal control. Our consideration of internal control over financia l reporting was for the limited purpose described in the first paragraph of this section and would not necessarily identify all deficiencies in internal control that might be significant deficiencies or material weaknesses. We d id not identify any deficiencies in internal control over financial reporting that we consider to be material weaknesses, as defined above. ~ ilnndepenllentmember~tf BAKE R TILLY -282330 East Paris Avenue, SE •P.O. Box 6547 • Grand Rapids, Ml 495 16 • 6 16.975.4 100 • Fax 6 16.975.4400 • www.rehmann.com INTERNATIONAL �C omplia11 ce a11d Other Mlltters As part of obtaining reasonable assurance about whether the Council of Michigan Foundations' financial statements are free of material misstatement, we performed tests of its compl iance with certain provisions of laws, regulations, contracts and grant agreements, noncompliance with which cou ld have a direct and material effect on the determination of financial statement amounts. However, providing an opinion on compliance with those provisions was not an objective of our audit and, accordingly, we do not express such an opinion. The results of our tests disclosed no instances of noncompliance or other matters that are required to be reported under Government Auditing Standards. This report is intended solely for the infom1ation and use of the Board of D irectors, management, federal awarding agenc ies and pass-through entities and is not intended to be and should not be used by anyone other than these specified parties. -29- � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Financials Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book financials Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book financials. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50743 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/5ce84da29ef3c1db4a6e5c00cb4ca2ac.pdf bfb0f2c119162f4aa54c503bdfdf7b0a PDF Text Text National Analysis of Federal Excise Tax on Capital Gains Prepared For: Council of Michigan Foundations September 12, 2008 �National Analysis ofFederal Excise Tax on Capital Gains Prepared For: Council of Michigan Foundations September 12, 2008 Bruce Myers Paige R oberts Copyright© 2008 by Cambridge Associates LLC. All rights reserved. This report may not be displayed, reproduced, distributed, transmitted, or used to create derivative works in any form, in whole or in portion, by any means, without written permission from Cambridge Associates LLC ('CA' ). Copying of this publication is a violation of federal copyright laws (17 U.S.C. 101 et seq.). Violators of this copyright may be subject to liability for substantial monetary damages. The information and material published in this report are confidential and non· transferable. This means that authorized members may not disclose any information or material derived from this report to third parties, or use information or material from this report, without prior written authorization. An authorized member may disclose information or material from this report to its staff. trustees, or Investment Committee with the understanding that these individuals will treat it confidentially. Additionally, information from this report may be disclosed if disclosure is required by law or court order, but members are required to provide notice to CA reasonably in advance of such disclosure. This report is provided for informational purposes only. It is not intended to constitute an offer of securities of any of the issuers that are described in the report. This report is provided only to persons that CA believes to be ' Accredited Investors' as that term is defined in Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933. When applicable, investors should completely review all Fund offering materials before considering an investment. No part of this report is intended as a recommendation of any firm or any security. Factual information contained herein about investment firms and their returns which has not been independently verified has generally been collected from the firms themselves through the mail. CA can neither assure nor accept responsibility for accuracy, but substantial legal liability may apply to misrepresentations of results delivered through the mail. The CA manager universe statistics, including medians, are derived from CA's proprietary database covering investment managers. These universe statistics and rankings exclude managers that exclude cash from their reported total returns, and for calculations including any years from 1998 to the present, those managers with less than $50 million in product assets. Returns for inactive (discontinued) managers are included if performance is available for the entire period measured. Performance results are generally gross of investment management fees. CA does not necessarily endorse or recommend the managers in this universe. Cambridge Associates, LLC is a Massachusetts limited liability company with offices in Arlington, VA; Boston, MA; Dallas, TX; and Menlo Park, CA. Cambridge Associates Limited is registered as a limited company in England and Wales No. 06135829 and is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority in the conduct of Investment Business. Cambridge Associates Limited, LLC is a Massachusetts limited liability company with a branch office in Sydney, Australia (ARBN 109 366 654). Cambridge Associates Asia Pte Ltd is a Singapore corporation (Registration No. 2001 01063G). �ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL EXCISE TAX ON CAPITAL GAINS Prepared For: COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS Conclusion Currently, most private foundations pay a tax on net investment income, which is commonly referred to as an excise tax. The tax is 2% of net investment income unless certain factors permit a reduction to I%. We have been asked to calculate the unified or "flat tax" rate that would be revenue neutral to the Treasury. Based on an analysis of the most recent five year period for which substantive date is available (2000 2004), we have concluded that the revenue neutral percentage is 1.32%. Methodology The following exhibits summarize in graphical or tabular form information taken from the online postings of the Internal Revenue Service's Statistics of Income Division ("SOl"). SOl publishes (with a multi-year lag) inforn1ation taken from the Form 990 returns on all foundations. We have, in turn, used this infonnation to make a series of basic calculations as they pertain to the excise tax. Analysis Derived from IRS Statistical Sample of Return Data The infonnation presented here is based on the fi ve years ending with fiscal year 2004, which is the last year currently available to the public in online form. We should note that while ilie SOl data attempts to represent the aggregate effects of the excise tax (and other 990 line items), it is not derived from simply adding the numbers found on more than 50,000 returns. Rather, the SOl has stratified the foundation universe by size and, using generally accepted statistical methodology, has derived data for the universe based on the sample. We have, in turn, taken the SOl's results as presented and done additional analysis based on their statistical samples. Non-Operating Foundations are the Primary Source of Excise Tax Revenue Additionally, we based our analysis on the non-operating segment of the SOl private foundations data files. A small number of private operating foundations are considered exempt organizations under the Internal Revenue Code and are not subject to the tax on net investment income. Since the operating foundation segment of ilie IRS data includes both exempt and non-exempt operating foundations, any analysis of aggregate excise tax receipts that includes operating foundations would skew the results. Non-operating foundations (the data for which is the subject of this study) represent approximately 90% of all foundations numerically, and an even greater percentage of excise tax receipts. ©Cambridge Associates LLC �2 ANALYSIS OF FEDERAL EXCISE TAX ON CAPITAL GAINS Prepared For: COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS (continued) For the sake of completeness, we have shown the data for operating and non-operating foundations in Exhibits 6 through 10. In addition to segmenting the Form 990 data into operating and non-operating foundations, SOl also segments out grant making and Nongrant making categories, although the grant making function has no impact on the excise tax calculation. Nonetheless, data from these segments can be found in Exhibits 6 through 10 as well. ©Cambridge Associates LLC �3 EXHIBIT 1 This chart calculates a "revenue neutral" excise tax rate for tax years 2000 through 2004, as well as a five-year average, for all non-operating foundations. While the amount of revenue generated from the excise tax was highly variable over these five years (see exhibit 2), the effective rate of the tax was far less so. • The effective tax rates for years 2000, 2002, and 2003 were at or near the five year average rate of 1.32%. The rate was significantly lower in 2001 and correspondingly higher in 2004. In both years, the behavior of the largest tier of foundations influenced the average for all foundations. • While there are differences from year to year, in general the excise tax is somewhat recessive, with smaller foundations more frequently paying higher effective rates than larger foundations, and the largest foundations typically paying the lowest effective rate. The numbers here were derived by dividing the aggregate tax paid by the amount of aggregate net investment income. ©Cambridge Associates LLC �4 EXH IBIT I COUNCIL OF M I CHI GAN FOUNDATI ONS N O NOPERATING FOUNDATI ONS Excise Tax Paid (As 'Yo of Net Investme nt Income) Total Nonoperating By Size: 2000 1.32% 2001 1.2 1% 2002 1.35% 2003 1.32% 2004 1.41 % Zero or unreported $ 1 to $99,999 $ 100,000 to $999,999 $ 1,000,000 to 9,999,999 $ 10,000,000 to 24,999,999 $25,000,000 to 49,999,999 $50,000,000 to 99,999,999 $ 100,000,000 or more 0.00% 1.52% 1.51% 1.44% 1.41% 1.39% 1.36% 1.26% 0.00% 1.52% 1.42% 1.34% 1.35% 1.32% 1.28% 1.12% 1.00% 1.25% 1.69% 1.44% 1.34% 1.3 1% 1.28% 1.31 % 1.00% 1.53% 1.51 % 1.44% 1.47% 1.40% 1.31 % 1.25% 1.64% 1.13% 1.53% 1.50% 1.51 % 1.43% 1.46% 1.37% 1.80% 1.70% 1.60% 1.50% 1.40% 1.30% 1.20% 1.10% 1.00% Five Year Ave rage 1.32% 1.2 1% 1.39% 1.53% 1.43% 1.42% 1.37% 1.34% 1.26% ~-----------~~---------------------------· -2000 -1---\-----,~~~~~-~=~----------' - 2001 ~---~ct~tSfS~~~~~~::~~~~~~~~ - 2002 --J-----YJPIT-t-t-----------=""""-~~~::=-------i ~-~-+~rf--------------------------~~---, ~---~~----------------------------------- 2003 - 2004 - Five Year Average +-_L--~---,----,-----,----,----,-----,----, ©Cambridge Associates LLC �5 EXHIBIT 2 This chart summarizes the revenue generated by the excise tax from non-operating foundations in the five years under analysis as well as the average amount of revenue for the 5-year period. The SOl breaks down the data based on the size stratifications shown. • Revenue generated by the excise tax is highly variable over time, notwithstanding the fact that the effective rate was relatively stable over the same period (as shown in Exhibit 1.) • Level of revenue generated tends to follow the economic and business cycle, with a peak in revenue in 2000 followed by a sharp decline, and then a gradual rebuilding with the return of more favorable market conditions in 2003 and 2004. • A comparison of Exhibits 1 and 2 would indicate that the absolute level of revenue generated by the excise tax is more sensitive to the market cycle than it is to the effective rate of the excise tax. Indeed, in year 2002 the absolute level of revenue declined even though the effective rate of the excise tax increased. (Compare total non-operating foundation results for 2001 and 2002 on Exhibits 1 and 2.) ©Cambridge Associates LLC �6 EXHIBIT 2 C OUNCIL O F M IC HIGAN FOUNDATIONS NONOPE RATING FOUN DATIO NS Revenue Generated from Excise Tax (In Thousands) Total Nonoperating By Size: 2000 601,196 2001 297,100 2002 224,698 2003 316,484 2004 456,435 Five Yea r Average 379,183 Zero or Unreported $1 to $99,999 $100,000 to $999,999 $1 ,000,000 to 9,999,999 $10,000,000 to 24,999,999 $25,000,000 to 49,999,999 $50,000,000 to 99,999,999 $100,000,000 or More 2 639 13,438 82,213 51 ,810 55,733 51 ,541 345,821 17 1 11,522 47,988 28,729 26,243 24,358 158,089 33 459 12,641 33,787 22,727 18,057 18,754 118,24 1 161 1,018 7,810 41,937 32,597 26,652 26,441 179,868 3 875 9,407 52,350 42,392 39,865 4 1,812 269,731 50 632 10,964 51 ,655 35,65 1 33,310 32,58 1 2 14,350 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% • $100,000,000 or More • $50,000,000 to 99,999,999 • $25,000,000 to 49,999,999 • $1 0,000,000 to 24,999,999 • $1,000,000 to 9,999,999 D $100,000 to $999,999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Five Year Average • $1 to $99,999 D Zero or U nreported ©Cambridge Associates LLC �7 EXHIBIT 3 • Foundations with assets of $100 million or more consistently represent 50 to 60% of all revenue from the excise tax. • Foundations with assets under $10 million represent a significant portion of aggregate receipts due to the large number of foundations in that size category (Exhibit 4) and the generally higher effective tax rate (Exhibit I). ©Cambridge Associates LLC �8 EXHIBIT 3 COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS NONOPERATING FOUNDATI ONS Distribution of Revenue Gener ated from Excise Tax 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 Total Nonoperating By Size: 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0% Five Year Average 100.0% Zero or unreported $ 1 to $99,999 $ 100,000 to $999,999 $ 1,000,000 to 9,999,999 $ 10,000,000 to 24,999,999 $25,000,000 to 49,999,999 $50,000,000 to 99,999,999 $ 100,000,000 or more 0.0% 0.1 % 2 .2% 13.7% 8.6% 9 .3% 8.6% 57.5% 0.0% 0.1% 3.9% 16.2% 9.7% 8.8% 8.2% 53.2% 0.0% 0.2% 5.6% 15.0% 10.1 % 8.0% 8.3% 52.6% 0.1 % 0.3% 2 .5% 13.3% 10.3% 8 .4% 8 .4% 56.8% 0.0% 0.2% 2.1% 11.5% 9.3% 8.7% 9.2% 59.1 % 0.0% 0.2% 3.3% 13.9% 9.6% 8.7% 8.5% 55.9% YEAR 2001 YEAR2000 0.0% 53.2% 8.2% YEAR 2003 YEAR 2002 10.1 % 52.6% 56.8% .4% 8.3% FIVE YEAR AVERAG E YEAR 2004 55.9% [] Zero or unreported • s1 to $99,999 C $ 100,000 to $999,999 • $1,000,000 to 9,999,999 • $ 10,000,000 to 24,999,999 • $25,000,000 to 49,999,999 • sso,ooo,ooo to 99,999,999 • $100,000,000 or more 7% ©Cambridge Associates LLC �9 EXHIBIT 4 This exhibit shows the number of non-operating foundations that paid the excise tax in the year indicated. This is usually a number slightly less than that shown by SOl for all non-operating foundations filing a Fonn 990, indicating that there are a small number of foundations each year which do not generate net investment income taxable under the excise tax rules. • It is instructive to compare the number of returns filed by foundations with assets of less than $10 million (typically more than 90% of all returns filed) with the modest amount of revenue (Exhibit 2) derived from this same group. • This raises the question of whether the resources allocated by both the foundation community in preparing these filings and paying the tax, and by the Service in processing these returns, could be employed to other (more productive) efforts. ©Cambridge Associates LLC �10 EXH IBIT 4 C O UNC IL OF M ICHIG AN FOUN DATIONS NONOPERATING FOU NDATIONS Num be r of Ret ur ns Filed Total Nonoperating By Size: 2000 52,34 1 2001 51 ,414 2002 52,440 2003 53,602 2004 57,8 15 Five Year Average 53,522 Zero or unreported $ 1 to $99,999 $ 100,000 to $999,999 $ 1,000,000 to 9,999,999 $ 10,000,000 to 24,999,999 $25,000,000 to 49,999,999 $50,000,000 to 99,999,999 $ 100,000,000 or more 299 8,971 22,763 16,083 2,292 965 472 496 10,253 20,960 16, 135 2,218 932 457 459 427 10,291 22,399 15,453 2, 137 854 445 434 497 8,456 23, 135 17,075 2,420 1,008 5 12 498 596 9,830 24,255 18,251 2,652 1, 111 569 552 364 9,560 22,702 16,599 2,344 974 491 488 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% • $ 100,000,000 or more • $50,000,000 to 99,999,999 • $25,000,000 to 49,999,999 • $ 10,000,000 to 24,999,999 • $1,000,000 to 9,999,999 D $ 100,000 to $999,999 • $ 1 to $99,999 D Zero or unreported 2000 200 1 2002 2003 2004 Five Year Average ©Cambridge Associates LLC �II EXHIBITS 5-10 Exhibit 5 presents the methodology used by SOl in segmenting the data on private foundations. As noted earlier, private non-operating foundations are the largest segment, and are free of the distortions caused by the potential inclusion of operating foundations that are exempt from the excise tax. For that reason we have based this analysis on the data for non-operating foundations. In Exhibits 6 through 10 we show a fuller range of the underlying data d isclosed by SOl and use this data to calculate the lost revenue per year (and by size tranche) if the excise tax were simplified to a flat 1%. Additionally, we would like to point out that: • The current two-tiered (1 %/2%) structure encourages foundations subject to the excise tax to periodically reduce programming, limit realization of gains where possible, and reset the starting point for qualification for the lower I% rate. • When the need for a "reset year" coincides with the need for emergency programming, the desire to respond to community needs is placed in conflict with the desire to maintain a prudent level of payout. • A simplified rate would preserve existing levels of revenue while eliminating the incentive to restrict programming in order to qualify for favorable tax treatment. • A simplified rate would also eliminate the recessive nature of the current structure which results in smaller foundations typically paying a higher effective rate of excise tax. ©Cambridge Associates LLC �12 EXHIBIT 5 PRIVATE FOUNDATION UNIVERSE AS SEGMENTED BY THE STATISTICS OF INCOME DIVISION OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE Tax Year 2003 Numbers slww11 above box es are as f ollows: *The first number is the number of returns filed for that segment in Tax Year 2003 *The second number is the mean excise tax percentage paid by the segment in Tax Year 2003 60,560 I 1.30% Private Foundation Universe 56,577 1 1.32% 3,983 I 0.97% Non-Operating Foundations Operating Foundations ~JI31% 1\'on-Operatmg Non-Grantmakmg Foundations Non-Operating Grantmaking Foundations Operating Gran tmaking Foundations Operatmg Non-Grantmaking Foundations ~5,661 1 1~ A ll G rantmaking Foundations I I Data used for A nalysis in this Study Segment Data Not Disclosed by IRS ©Cambridge Associates LLC �13 EXH IBIT 6 COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS EXC ISE T AX ANALYSIS YEAR 2000 Net Investment Income Excise Tax Percent Return(#) Amount($) Return (#) Amount($) Amount(%) All Foundations Total ......................................................... 57,699 48,830,268 55,733 625,047 1.28 *299 *22 *299 *[2] Zero or unreported .............................. $1 under $1 00,000... .. ...................... 10,47 1 43,396 9,275 664 1.53 24,849 24,4 14 14,081 1.52 $100,000 under $1 ,000,000 ... 925,769 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 17,220 5,998,782 16,997 85,960 1.43 2,733 56,868 1.37 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 2,788 4, 135,985 1,022 4, 142,780 1,001 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .. 57,156 1.38 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 503 3,918,702 488 1.34 52,399 547 29,664,831 525 357,919 1.21 $100,000,000 or more.............. ................... Nonoperating Foundations 45,653,535 52,341 601,196 Total.. ....................................................... 54,019 1.32 Zero or unreported ... *299 *22 *299 *[2] $1 under $1 00,000 ............................. 10, 167 42, 17 1 8,971 639 1.52 23, 198 890,614 22,763 13,438 1.51 $100,000 under $1,000,000 1.44 $1,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 16, 117 5,706,424 16,083 82,213 3,684,767 51,810 1.41 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 2,30 1 2,292 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 966 4,017,040 965 55,733 1.39 473 3,795,868 472 51 ,541 1.36 $50,000,000 under S I 00,000,000 $1 00,000,000 or more ......... 27,5 16,629 496 498 345,821 1.26 Opcr:lting Foundations 3,391 23,851 0.75 3,680 3, 176,732 Total.. ....................................................... Zero or unreported ............................... $1 under $1 00,000... ........................... *304 * 1,225 *304 *25 $1 00,000 under $1 ,000,000 .................... 1,65 1 35,155 1,65 1 643 1.83 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 1, 103 292,358 914 3,747 1.28 $1 0,000,000 under $25,000,000 .................. 487 451,218 441 5,058 1.12 $25,000,000 unde1 $50,000,000 .................. 56 125,740 36 1,422 1.13 30 122,834 16 0.70 $50,000,000 under $1 00,000,000 ... 857 2, 148,202 12,098 0.56 $100,000,000 or more...................... 49 29 G rant making Foundations 47,206,505 Total.. ....................................................... 5 1,420 50,239 603,813 1.28 *299 *[2] Zero or unreported ... *299 *22 $1 under $1 00,000....... .................. 8,97 1 35, 164 8,074 1.42 499 880,710 21 ,602 13,373 1.52 $100,000 under $1,000,000 2 1,782 $1,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 . ................... 16,046 5,482,737 1.41 15,993 77,279 2,3 17 52,511 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 ... 2,340 1.39 3,784,998 962 55,514 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 97 1 4,027,815 1.38 482 3,754,750 475 50,060 1.33 $50,000,000 under S I 00,000,000 517 354,576 $1 00,000,000 or more....... 29,240,309 1.21 529 G rant making-Nonopcratiog Foundation Total... ...................................................... 49,282 45,034,341 48, 176 589,525 1.31 *299 *22 *299 *[2] Zero or unreported .............................. $1 under $1 00,000... 8,97 1 1.42 .. ...................... 499 8,074 35,164 20,341 848,262 20,1 6 1 12,785 1.51 $100,000 under $1 ,000,000 ... $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 15,501 5,360,801 15,482 75,595 1.41 50,314 1.40 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 2,264 3,606,395 2,256 943 943 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .. 3,979,790 55,051 1.38 466 49,680 1.34 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 467 3,702,791 496 27,501, 116 495 345,601 1.26 $100,000,000 or more.............. ................... G r antmaking-Opernting Foundations 14,288 0.66 Total.. ....................................................... 2,137 2, 172, 163 2,063 Zero or unreported ... $1 under $1 00,000 ........................ $100,000 under $1,000,000 1,44 1 32,448 1,441 589 1.82 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 544 121,936 51 1 1,684 1.38 76 178,602 61 2, 197 1.23 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 463 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 28 48,025 0.96 19 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 51,959 9 380 0.73 15 $1 00,000,000 or more ......... 1,739, 193 33 22 8,976 0.52 • Estimate should be used with caution because of the small number of sample returns on which it is based. New Excise Tax at 1% Amount($) E xcise Tnx Differ ence Amount (S) 488,303 136,744 434 9,258 59,988 4 1,360 4 1,428 39, 187 296,648 230 4,823 25,972 15,508 15,728 13,212 61 ,271 456,535 144,661 422 8,906 57,064 36,848 40, 170 37,959 275, 166 2 17 4,532 25, 149 14,962 15,563 13,582 70,655 3 1,767 -7,916 352 2,924 4,5 12 1,257 1,228 2 1,482 291 823 546 165 -37 1 -9,384 472,065 13 1,748 352 8,807 54,827 37,850 40,278 37,548 292,403 147 4,566 22,452 14,661 15,236 12,513 62,173 450,343 139,182 352 8,483 53,608 36,064 39,798 37,028 275,0 11 147 4,302 2 1,987 14,250 15,253 12,652 70,590 21 ,722 -7,434 324 1,219 1,786 480 520 17,392 265 465 4 11 -1 7 -1 40 -8,4 16 © Cambridge Associates LLC �14 EXH IBIT 7 COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS EXC ISE T AX ANALYSIS YEAR 2001 Net Investment Income Excise Tax Percent Amount($) Return (#) Amount($) Amount(%) Return(#) All Foundations Total ......................................................... 57,536 25,719,096 55,584 305,294 1.19 Zero or unreported .............................. $1 under $1 00,000... 12,8 17 13, 124 11 , 108 ........................ 1.55 204 22,825 834,151 22,825 11,885 1.42 $100,000 under $1 ,000,000 ... $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 17,495 3,786,196 17,365 50,428 1.33 30,039 1.34 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 2,400 2,243,971 2,348 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .. 1,000 2,066,457 1.31 978 27,069 496 2,023,353 479 25,163 1.24 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 $100,000,000 or more .............. ................... 504 14,751,845 482 160,506 1.09 Nonoperating Foundations 24,482,873 51,4 14 297,100 1.21 Total.. ....................................................... 52,722 Zero or unreported ... $1 under $1 00,000 ............................. 11 ,535 11 ,232 10,253 17 1 1.52 $100,000 under $1,000,000 20,960 813,782 20,960 11 ,522 1.42 $1,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 16, 147 16,1 35 1.34 3,582,729 47,988 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 2,224 2, 125,976 2,2 18 28,729 1.35 26,243 1.32 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 1,991 ,290 935 932 460 1,901 ,762 457 24,358 1.28 $50,000,000 under S I 00,000,000 $1 00,000,000 or more ......... 462 14,056, 103 459 158,089 1.12 Opcr:lting Foundations 8,194 0.66 4,8 13 1,236,223 4, 170 Total.. ....................................................... Zero or unreported ............................... $1 under $1 00,000... ........................... *1,282 * 1,892 *854 *33 1,865 20,368 1,865 363 1.78 $100,000 under $1,000,000 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 1,348 203,467 1,230 2,440 1.20 $1 0,000,000 under $25,000,000 .................. 176 117,995 130 1,3 10 1.11 $25,000,000 unde1 $50,000,000 .................. 65 75,167 46 826 1.10 0.66 $50,000,000 under $ 100,000,000 ... 36 121,591 22 805 $100,000,000 or more ...................... 42 695,742 23 2,4 17 0.35 G rant making Foundations 25, 120,794 49,379 Total.. ....................................................... 49,885 297,966 1.19 Zero or unreported ... $1 under $1 00,000....... .................. 8,972 9,776 8,544 153 1.57 20,8 14 81 7,954 20,8 14 11 ,561 1.41 $100,000 under $1,000,000 46,019 $1,000,000 under $ 10,000,000. ................... 15,9 13 3,499,390 15,889 1.32 2,246 29,213 1.34 2,268 2, 174,626 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 ... 25,964 1.30 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 956 1,990, 150 945 476 1,968, 146 466 24,833 1.26 $50,000,000 under S I 00,000,000 $1 00,000,000 or more ....... 14,660,752 475 160,224 487 1.09 G rant making-Nonopcratiog Foundation Total... ...................................................... 47,462 24,2 14,597 47,02.4 292, 107 1.21 Zero or unreported .............................. $1 under $1 00,000... 8,544 8,1 17 153 ........................ 9,748 1.57 $100,000 under $1 ,000,000 ... 19,561 804,840 19,561 11,343 1.41 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 15,330 3,397,660 15,330 44,396 1.31 28,419 1.35 2, 193 2, 109,136 2,1 88 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .. 1,951 ,887 919 1.31 920 25,507 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 455 1,893,820 452 24,235 1.28 459 14,047,507 457 158,054 1.13 $100,000,000 or more .............. ................... G r antmaking-Opernting Foundations 0.65 Total.. ....................................................... 2,423 906,196 5,859 2,356 Zero or unreported ... $1 under $1 00,000 ........................ 427 28 427 *[2] $100,000 under $1,000,000 1,253 13,114 1,253 2 18 1.66 101,730 1,623 1.60 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 583 560 75 65,49 1 794 1.21 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 58 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 36 38,263 26 457 1.19 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 21 74,326 14 597 0.80 $1 00,000,000 or more ......... 613,245 28 2,170 0.35 18 • Estimate should be used with caution because of the small number of sample returns on which it is based. New Excise Tax at 1% Amount($) E xcise Tnx Differ ence Amount (S) 257,191 48,103 131 8,342 37,862 22,440 20,665 20,234 147,5 18 73 3,543 12,566 7,599 6,404 4,929 12,988 244,829 52,271 112 8, 138 35,827 2 1,260 19,9 13 19,0 18 140,561 59 3,384 12, 161 7,469 6,330 5,340 17,528 12,362 -4,168 204 2,035 1, 180 752 1,2 16 6,957 159 405 130 74 -4 11 -4,540 251 ,208 46,758 98 8, 180 34,994 2 1,746 19,902 19,68 1 146,608 55 3,381 11 ,025 7,467 6,063 5,152 13,6 16 242,146 49,961 97 8,048 33,977 2 1,091 19,5 19 18,938 140,475 56 3,295 10,4 19 7,328 5,988 5,297 17,579 9,062 -3,203 131 1,0 17 655 383 743 6, 132 87 606 139 74 -1 46 -3,962 © Cam bridge Associates LLC �15 EXH IBIT 8 COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS EXC ISE T AX ANALYSIS YEAR 2002 Net Investment Income Excise Tax Percent Return (#) Amount($) Amount(%) Return (#) Amount($) All Foundations Total ......................................................... 58,632 17,647,6 18 55,839 233,674 1.32 *427 *3,277 *427 *33 Zero or unreported .............................. $1 under $1 00,000... 10,717 .. ...................... 13,277 489 1.27 38,586 $100,000 under $1 ,000,000 ... 24,22 1 767,435 24,22 1 12,981 1.69 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 16,501 2,488,704 16,380 35,4 10 1.42 23,528 1.33 2,329 1,770,079 2,271 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .. 1,446,230 894 18,721 1.29 912 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 485 1,563,269 472 19,764 1.26 $100,000,000 or more .............. ................... 481 9,570,038 457 122,749 1.28 Nonoperating Foundations 52,440 224,698 Total.. ....................................................... 54,547 16,666,035 1.35 *3,277 *427 *33 *427 Zero or unreported ... $1 under $1 00,000 ............................. 12,424 36,742 10,291 459 1.25 22,399 749,301 22,399 12,641 1.69 $100,000 under $1,000,000 $1,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 15,4 12 2,342,221 15,453 33,787 1.44 2, 145 1,690,873 2, 137 22,727 1.34 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 857 1,377,879 854 18,057 1.31 445 1,462,812 445 18,754 1.28 $50,000,000 under S I 00,000,000 $1 00,000,000 or more ......... 434 118,24 1 1.31 9,002,929 438 Opcr:lting Foundations 981,583 3,399 8,976 0.91 4,085 Total.. ....................................................... Zero or unreported ............................... $1 under $1 00,000... ........................... *853 * 1,843 *427 *3 1 $1 00,000 under $1 ,000,000 .................... 1,82 1 18,134 1,82 1 340 1.88 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 1,088 146,482 927 1,623 1.11 $1 0,000,000 under $25,000,000 .................. 184 79,206 134 801 1.01 $25,000,000 unde1 $50,000,000 .................. 55 68,35 1 40 664 0.97 40 100,458 27 1,010 1.00 $50,000,000 under $ 100,000,000 ... 43 567, 109 23 4,508 0.79 $100,000,000 or more ...................... G rant making Foundations Total.. ....................................................... 52,481 50,763 230,727 1.33 17,358,906 Zero or unreported ... $1 under $1 00,000....... .................. 10,291 35,694 8,585 438 1.23 12,892 1.69 $100,000 under $1,000,000 22,526 763,000 22,526 $1,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 . ................... 15,673 2,418,562 15,714 34,477 1.43 1.34 1,7 13,911 2, 164 2, 188 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 ... 22,883 867 18,474 1.30 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 876 1,422,887 463 1,519,380 456 19,206 1.26 $50,000,000 under S I 00,000,000 $1 00,000,000 or more ....... 464 9,485,471 452 122,357 1.29 G rant making-Nonopcratiog Foundation Total... ...................................................... 49,914 16,586,255 48,238 223,342 1.35 Zero or unreported .............................. $1 under $1 00,000... 10,291 35,694 8,585 438 1.23 ························ 20,828 745,529 20,828 12,565 1.69 $100,000 under $1 ,000,000 ... $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 14,968 2,308,745 15,009 33, 167 1.44 2, 102 22,436 1.34 2, 107 1,673,799 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .. 845 1,373,971 843 1.31 17,979 18,558 1.28 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 440 1,452,272 440 435 8,996,245 432 118, 198 1.31 $100,000,000 or more .............. ................... G r antmaking-Opernting Foundations Total.. ....................................................... 2,567 772,651 0.96 2,525 7,385 Zero or unreported ... $1 under $1 00,000 ........................ $100,000 under $1,000,000 *1,698 *17,47 1 * 1,698 *327 $1,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 1,3 10 705 109,818 705 119 81 40,112 62 446 1.11 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 31 48,916 24 495 1.01 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 23 67,108 16 647 0.96 $1 00,000,000 or more ......... 489,226 29 20 4,159 0.85 • Estimate should be used with caution because of the small number of sample returns on which it is based. New Excise Tax at 1% Amount($) E xcise Tnx Differ ence Amount (S) 176,476 57,198 386 7,674 24,887 17,701 14,462 15,633 95,700 104 5,307 10,523 5,827 4,259 4, 131 27,048 166,660 58,038 367 7,493 23,422 16,909 13,779 14,628 90,029 91 5,148 10,364 5,81 9 4,278 4, 126 28,212 9,816 -840 181 1,465 792 684 1,005 5,67 1 !59 !58 9 -1 9 5 - 1, 164 173,589 57,138 357 7,630 24, 186 17, 139 14,229 15, 194 94,855 81 5,262 10,292 5,743 4,245 4,012 27,502 165,863 57,479 357 7,455 23,087 16,738 13,740 14,523 89,962 81 5, 110 10,079 5,698 4,239 4,036 28,236 7,727 -342 1,098 401 489 67 1 4,892 2 12 45 6 -24 -734 © Cam bridge Associates LLC �16 EXH IBIT 9 COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS EXC ISE T AX ANALYSIS YEAR 2003 Net Investment Income Excise Tax Percent Amount($) Return (#) Amount($) Amount(%) Return(#) All Foundations Total ......................................................... 60,560 25,192,997 57,095 327,882 1.30 *796 *16, 142 *497 *161 Zero or unreported .............................. $1 under $1 00,000... .. ...................... 11 ,34 1 1,048 !.53 68,658 9,35 1 25,34 1 545,647 24,567 !.50 $100,000 under $1 ,000,000 ... 8,188 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 18,272 3,051,123 17,994 43,674 1.43 33,932 1.45 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 2,628 2,333,520 2,566 1,044 1,066 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .. 27,121 1.37 1,977,309 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 563 2,237,043 546 28,962 1.29 $100,000,000 or more .............. ................... 553 14,963,555 529 184,795 1.23 Nonoperating Foundations 24,022,642 53,602 316,484 Total.. ....................................................... 56,577 1.32 *16, 142 *497 *161 Zero or unreported ... *796 $1 under $1 00,000 ............................. 10,445 66,69 1 8,456 1,0 18 !.53 23,754 518,668 23, 135 7,8 10 !.51 $100,000 under $1,000,000 $1,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 17,127 2,911,250 17,075 41,937 1.44 1.47 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 2,426 2,210,220 2,420 32,597 1,01 1 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 1,905,465 1,008 26,652 1.40 514 2,024,333 512 26,44 1 1.31 $50,000,000 under S I 00,000,000 $1 00,000,000 or more ......... 14,369,872 503 498 179,868 1.25 Opcr:lting Foundations 11,398 0.97 1, 170,354 3,493 Total.. ....................................................... 3,983 Zero or unreported ............................... $1 under $1 00,000... ........................... *895 * 1,966 *895 *3 1 $1 00,000 under $1 ,000,000 .................... 1,587 26,980 1,432 1.40 379 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 1, 145 139,873 918 1,737 1.24 $1 0,000,000 under $25,000,000 .................. 202 123,299 146 1,335 1.08 $25,000,000 unde1 $50,000,000 .................. 55 71,844 36 469 0 .65 $50,000,000 under $ 100,000,000 ... 212,710 34 2,52 1 49 1.18 50 31 4,928 0.83 $100,000,000 or more ...................... 593,682 G rant making Foundations Total.. ....................................................... 55,661 24,593,688 320,320 1.30 52,879 *161 Zero or unreported ... *796 * 16, 142 *497 $1 under $1 00,000....... .................. 9,650 62,4 12 7,859 1.48 925 23,538 536,977 23,023 8,0 19 1.49 $100,000 under $1,000,000 1.43 $1,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 . ................... 17,10 1 41 , 128 2,883,395 16,982 2,452 32,110 1.45 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 ... 2,478 2,208,363 26, 163 1,027 1,898,412 1,0 16 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 1.38 538 2, 113,758 529 27,222 1.29 $50,000,000 under S I 00,000,000 $1 00,000,000 or more ....... 534 14,874,230 521 1.24 184,592 G rant making-Nonopcratiog Foundation Total... ...................................................... 53,459 23,782,225 50,842 311,827 1.31 *796 *16, 142 *497 *161 Zero or unreported .............................. $1 under $1 00,000... 7,461 .. ...................... 9,252 61,632 9 16 1.49 22,468 510,792 22,005 7,654 1.50 $100,000 under $1 ,000,000 ... $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 16,555 2,810,735 16,503 39,967 1.42 31 ,218 1.46 2,382 2, 139,330 2,377 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .. 997 1,862,276 995 25,822 1.39 26,251 1.30 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 510 2,014,814 508 500 14,366,504 496 179,837 1.25 $100,000,000 or more .............. ................... G r antmaking-Opernting Foundations Total.. ....................................................... 2,202 8 11 ,464 8,492 1.05 2,037 Zero or unreported ... $1 under $1 00,000 ........................ *398 *780 *398 *8 26,185 1,0 19 365 1.39 1,07 1 $100,000 under $1,000,000 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 546 72,660 479 1,160 1.60 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 69,033 75 891 1.29 96 36, 136 21 341 0.94 30 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 28 98,943 21 97 1 0.98 $1 00,000,000 or more ......... 34 507,726 4,756 0.94 25 • Estimate should be used with caution because of the small number of sample returns on which it is based. New Excise Tax at 1% Amount($) E xcise Tnx Differ ence Amount (S) 251 ,930 75,952 687 5,456 30,5 11 23,335 19,773 22,370 149,636 362 2,732 13, 163 10,597 7,348 6,591 35, 160 240,226 76,257 667 5, 187 29, 112 22, 102 19,055 20,243 143,699 35 1 2,623 12,825 10,495 7,597 6, 198 36, 169 11,704 -305 270 1,399 1,233 718 2, 127 5,937 109 338 102 393 - 1,009 245,937 74,383 624 5,370 28,834 22,084 18,984 2 1, 138 148,742 301 2,649 12,294 10,026 7, 179 6,084 35,850 237,822 74,005 616 5, 108 28, 107 2 1,393 18,623 20, 148 143,665 300 2,546 11 ,860 9,825 7,200 6, 103 36, 171 8, 115 378 262 727 690 361 989 5,077 103 434 201 -20 -1 9 -322 -250 © Cam bridge Associates LLC �17 EXHIBIT 10 COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS EXC ISE T AX ANALYSIS YEAR 2004 Net Investment Income Excise Tax Percent Return(#) Amount($) Return (#) Amount($) Amount(%) All Foundations Total ......................................................... 6 1,845 34,019,443 58,780 468,672 1.38 *596 *183 *298 *3 Zero or unreported .............................. $1 under $1 00,000... .. ...................... 10,922 79,836 9,233 905 1.13 25,706 634,202 24,984 1.53 $100,000 under $1 ,000,000 ... 9,672 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 19,359 3,665,652 19,1 39 54,476 1.49 43,855 1.50 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 2,863 2,926,024 2,799 1,1 49 1.41 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .. 1, 178 2,897,457 40,985 616 3,045,351 602 43,242 1.42 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 605 20,770,738 577 275,535 1.33 $100,000,000 or more.............. ................... Nonoperating Foundations 32,288,893 456,435 1.41 Total.. ....................................................... 57,8 15 55,576 *3 Zero or unreported ... *596 *183 *298 $1 under $1 00,000 ............................. 9,830 77,472 8,439 875 1.13 $100,000 under $1,000,000 24,255 616,755 23,737 9,407 1.53 $1,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 18,25 1 18,241 52,350 150 3,495,780 2,647 42,392 1.51 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 2,652 2,798,824 1,1 03 39,865 1.43 1, 111 2,787,491 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 569 2,865,497 568 41 ,812 1.46 $50,000,000 under S I 00,000,000 $1 00,000,000 or more......... 19,646,891 544 269,731 552 1.37 Opcr:lting Foundations 4,030 1,730,551 3,204 12,237 0.71 Total.. ....................................................... Zero or unreported ............................... $1 under $1 00,000... ........................... *1,092 *2,364 *794 *29 1,452 17,447 1,247 265 1.52 $100,000 under $1,000,000 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 1, 108 169,873 898 2, 126 1.25 $1 0,000,000 under $25,000,000 .................. 211 127,199 152 1,464 1.15 $25,000,000 unde1 $50,000,000 .................. 67 109,967 46 1, 120 1.02 $50,000,000 under $1 00,000,000 ... 47 179,853 34 1,430 0.80 0.52 33 $100,000,000 or more...................... 1, 123,848 5,804 53 G rant making Foundations Total.. ....................................................... 56,261 33,456,091 462,973 54,236 1.38 *3 Zero or unreported ... *596 *183 *298 $1 under $1 00,000....... .................. 8,638 74,099 7,347 8 11 1.09 1.52 $100,000 under $1,000,000 23,732 619,528 23,426 9,398 3,571 ,504 $1,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 . ................... 18,2 17 1.49 18,279 53,258 2,821 ,230 2,687 42,328 1.50 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 ... 2,714 2,847,089 1,1 12 40,551 1.42 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 1, 126 590 2,952,401 584 42,738 1.45 $50,000,000 under S I 00,000,000 $1 00,000,000 or more....... 20,570,056 565 273,886 1.33 585 G rant making-Nonopcratiog Foundation Tohll ......................................................... 54,090 32,179,754 52,414 454,430 1.41 *596 *183 *298 *3 Zero or unreported .............................. $1 under $1 00,000... 7,943 1.09 6,850 790 72,596 ························ $100,000 under $1 ,000,000 ... 22,95 1 605,534 22,696 1.52 9,192 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 17,779 3,468,964 17,768 51 ,869 1.50 2,6 13 41 ,494 1.51 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 2,618 2,753,588 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 .. 1,084 1.43 1,089 2,775,215 39,664 41 ,743 1.46 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 565 2,861 ,395 564 549 19,642,280 541 269,673 1.37 $100,000,000 or more.............. ................... G r antmaking-Opernting Foundations Total.. ....................................................... 2,171 1,276,337 1,822 8,543 0.67 Zero or unreported ... $1 under $1 00,000 ........................ *695 * 1504 *496 *21 13,994 73 1 206 1.47 781 $100,000 under $1,000,000 $1 ,000,000 under $ 10,000,000 .................... 501 102,540 449 1,388 1.35 67,643 74 834 1.23 $10,000,000 under $25,000,000 96 71 ,873 28 886 1.23 $25,000,000 under $50,000,000 37 $50,000,000 under $100,000,000 25 91,006 20 995 1.09 $1 00,000,000 or more......... 24 4,2 13 36 927,777 0.45 • Estimate should be used with caution because of the small number of sample returns on which it is based. New Excise Tax at 1% Amount($) Excise T nx Differ ence Amount (S) 340,194 128,478 798 6,342 36,657 29,260 28,975 30,454 207,707 107 3,330 17,819 14,595 12,010 12,788 67,828 322,889 133,546 775 6, 168 34,958 27,988 27,875 28,655 196,469 100 3,239 17,392 14,404 11 ,990 13, 157 73,262 17,306 -5,069 174 1,699 1,272 1, 100 1,799 11 ,238 91 427 192 20 -369 -5,434 334,561 128,412 741 6, 195 35,7 15 28,2 12 28,47 1 29,524 205,701 70 3,203 17,543 14, 116 12,080 13,214 68,185 321,798 132,632 726 6,055 34,690 27,536 27,752 28,6 14 196,423 64 3, 137 17, 179 13,958 11 ,912 13, 129 73,250 12,763 -4,220 140 1,025 676 7 19 910 9,278 66 363 158 167 85 -5,065 © Cambridge Associates LLC � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Federal-Excise-Tax Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book federal excise tax Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book federal excise tax. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50742 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/58b527ddf2c9a22bad2ed7d8940aade1.pdf d0e73ee930de101d8ce1f09e728d9ba0 PDF Text Text Diversity Philanthropy he Diversity in Philanthropy Project (DPP) celebrates a year of success in uniting leading philanthropic sector executives, CEOs, trustees, and research experts behind a shared commitment to leverage more ful ly diverse talents and perspectives in our profession and society. DPP builds on a long tradition of efforts by forward-looking inclusiveness advocates to improve our sector's relevance and impact. Our current efforts are intended to encourage more field-wide gains on these issues. DPP exists because we believe diversity can add value to independent sector organizational staffing, programming, grantmaking, contracting, operations, and planning. Last year the project began with an historic series of standing-room only sessions at the 2007 Council on Foundations Meeting in Seattle. Panelists and participants explored the full spectrum of diversity issues - from organizational effectiveness to asset management strategies. efforts to articulate principles and practices that can guide our future work, forge effective partnerships, and encourage new thinking and promising practices to realize our full potential in a rapidly changing world. • Hundreds of attendees shared realworld experiences and offered candid dialogue on the myriad of challenges and opportunities that diversity poses for our organizations and society. - These initial sessions demonstrated a clear. shared desire to continue the conversation and work collaboratively to faci litate change. Building on this promising start. our mandate has been to join with our peers in exploring new frameworks for research and action as well as sharing best practices on diversity and effectiveness. In this Council on Foundations Summit briefing, you'll learn more about our communities -. �Advisory Board Our Strategy and Progress Robert K. Ross, MD (Chair) President and CEO. The California Endowment The Diversity in Philanthropy Project is dedicated to shaping the future of philanthropy by strengthening the diversity of perspectives and voices within our field. Susan Batten Senior Associate. Annie E. Casey Foundation Renna 0. Brown President. New York Regional Association of Grantmakers Our strategy combines an exploration of common commitments. advocacy for pioneering research, and shared learning to enhance our work and impact. Jessica Chao Vice President. Rockefeller Philanthropy Advi sors Victor De luca Voluntary Initiatives Partnerships and Learning Circles A core element for long-term impact is the development of guiding principles and practices that philanthropic leaders can employ to advance diversity and effectiveness in their organizations. DPP has also helped to create important new partnerships and encouraged learning circles with other diversity and effectiveness stakeholder groups. President and CEO. The Jessie Smit h Noyes Foundation Louis Delgado Trustee. Needmor Fund Linetta Gilbert Senior Program Officer. The Ford Foundation Steve Gunderson President. Council on Foundations Sandra R. Hernandez, MD President and CEO. The San Francisco Foundation St ephen B. Heintz President & CEO. Rockef eller Brothers Fund Gara LaMarche President & CEO. The Atlantic Philanthropies Thomas C. Layton President and CEO. Wallace Alexander Gerbode Foundation Carol Lewis President and CEO. Philanthropy Northwest Valerie S. Lies President and CEO. Donors Forum of Chicago Jane Isaacs Lowe Senior Program Officer. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Terry Mazany President and CEO. Chicago Community Trust Lawrence McGill Vice Prc~idcnt f or Rcsc:Jrch, Foundation Center Hugo Morales Trustee. Rosenberg Foundation John Morning Trustee. Charles Stewart Matt Foundation Based on broad field consultation. DPP has drafted statements of voluntary operating principles and practices to concretely help funders achieve more meaningful and measurable gains in diversity, while respecting their individual missions and interests. We look forward to further refining these documents with our advisors and partners. encouraging organizational adoption, launching a campaign to inspire commitment to meaningful inclusivity initiatives, and creating spaces for funders to undertake mutual support efforts. Research Mary Mount castle Trustee. Z. Smith Reynolds Foundation Gary D. Nelson, Ph.D. President and CEO. Healt hcare Georgia Foundation Peter H. Pennekamp Executive Director. Humboldt Area Foundation Joy Persall Executive Director. Native Americans in Philant hropy Lata N. Reddy Vice President and Secretary. Prudential Foundation Linda E. Reed Executive Director. Montana Community Foundation Miguel Satut Program Director. W.K. Kellogg Foundation Michael S. Seltzer Board Member. Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers Ruth Shack President and CEO. Dade Comm unity Foundation Unmi Song President and CEO. Lloyd A. Fry Foundation Arturo Vargas Trustee. Council on Foundations Luz Vega-Marquis President and CEO. Marguerite Casey Foundation Elsa Vega-Perez Trustee. The Saint Paul Foundation Cole Wilbur Trustee. David and Lucile Packard Foundation Richard Woo CEO. Russell Family Foundation In partnership with the Council on Foundations and Grantmakers for Effective Organizations. DPP recently assembled nearly a dozen leading philanthropy anchor organizations to explore collaborative opportunities to leverage diversity. Participating groups included the Forum of Regional Associations of Grantmakers. Change Action Partners (formerly Joint Affinity Group), the Race & Equity in Philanthropy Group, and the Center for Effective Philanthropy, among others. Allied efforts have sparked alliances with other important stakeholder groups including Philanthropy Northwest. Common Vision, and the Diversity-Focused Funders Project. DPP has convened a working group of leading independent sector researchers to develop a long-term research agenda and improvements in field data that inform more inclusive strategies and increase impact. Led by researchers from the Foundation Center, the Council on Foundations, ARNOVA, Independent Sector, and an impressive group of university· based scholars and field advocates. the Data and Research Working Group is convening leading practitioners to promote sector-wide collaboration and better tracking and reporting of foundation diversity performance. Finally, the Council of Michigan Foundations and DPP have formed a special partnership to strengthen the link between diversity and effectiveness in our field. Together we will develop new knowledge, tools, and supports for increasing diversity and inclusive practices among funde rs. We think this substantive regional program will have influence in encouraging comparable efforts in other key regions of t he national grantmaking field. Tools and Resources In September 2007, DPP launched an online resource to support field leadership education and exchange on diversity issues. At www.diversityinphilanthropy.org field leaders can access the latest news, events, and a comprehensive list of resources aimed at advancing dialogue and action. • �Common Principles and Promising Practices The following principles and practices originated from the philanthropic sector executives, CEOs, and trustees of the Diversity in Philanthropy Project. They express the unity of our intention while respecting that our approaches may vary. The principles and practices outlined here in draft form are not meant to be prescriptive; rather they represent a collective, voluntary effort to lift our field to a higher standard of operating practice. They can be employed in whole or in part to help philanthropic institutions more effectively achieve their missions. We share these ideas as a work-in-progress to stimulate discussion across our field. Our leadership group came together originally to focus on diversity of race, ethnicity, gender, sexual identity, disability, educational background, age, geographic location, and religious belief. However. we welcome all partners working on these and/or other dimensions of diversity. Our Principles Promising Practices We seek to encourage all foundation leaders to embrace the following principles intended to promote diversity as a matter of fairness and effectiveness in our profession. We seek to advance diversity by encouraging voluntary pract ices that include: Mutual Respect Within the parameters of our core values and charter requirements. we are committed to diversity, equity, and inclusion; and we fundamentally value and respect experiences that are different from our own. Freedom and Flexibility We promote a broad approach to diversity while respecting each individual foundation's commitment to address those aspects most germane to its mission. Knowledge and Creativity By increasing diversity, equity, and inclusion, we believe we will access more expansive and varied ideas. information, and perspectives, making us more creative, informed investors. Strategic Approach To achieve our aims. we believe it is necessary to be strategic and intentional in forma lizing and pursuing meaningful diversity goals as central aspects of our governance and programming. Transparency We believe we have a responsibility to society and our sect or to achieve our goals with honesty and transparency, regularly reporting progress and lessons learned along the way. Internal Diversity Assessments Conducting periodic assessments of board and staff appointments. grantmaking, and contracting to help institutional leaders identify priorities, recognize strategic opportunities, and enhance their diversity performance. Diversity Plans Developing and implementing diversity plans to help leaders design specific and concrete steps to expand representation and engagement from diverse communities in their mission and work. Field Development and Coordination Supporting more integrated and coordinated planning, investment, and action to expand the field 's overall capacity for change. Peer Support Building peer networks, both forma l and informal, to help individuals, their institutions, and the larger field achieve greater diversity. Periodic Progress Reporting Tracking progress, communicating accomplishments, and sharing lessons learned to establish field-wide performance benchmarks and enhanced transparency and public accountability. Public Leadership Exercising visible leadership by encouraging others to join, publicly promoting the benefits of diversity, and identifying new strategies that lead to greater effectiveness. • ~~~n~dG~~~e;rch Alan J. Abramson The Aspen Institute Elizabeth T. Boris Urban Institute Renee B. Branch Council on Foundations Mary Ellen Capek Capek & Associates Michael Cortes Independent Researcher/Consultant Aaron Dorfman National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy Barry Gaberman Worldwide Initiat ives for Grantmaker Support (WINGS) Lisa R. Jackson Center for Effective Philanthropy Nadine T. Jalandoni Independent Sector Thomas G. Jeavons ARNOVA Judith Kroll Council on Foundations Steven Lawrence The Foundation Center Kien S. Lee, Ph.D. Association for the Study and Development of Community Lawrence T. McGill The Foundation Center Ricardo A. Millett Independent Consultant/Researcher Scott Nielsen Alexander Nielson Consulting Michael Omi University of California Joel J. Orosz Grand Valley State University Kenneth Prewitt Columbia Universit y School of International & Public Affairs Henry A. J. Ramos Mauer Kunst Consulting "Diversity, as we embrace it. is not about promoting quotas or varying standards of excellence. Rather. it is about optimally tapping, growing. and aligning the still-to-be-utilized assets we have available to us within our institutions and society to improve the human condition in the United States and elsewhere across the planet." - Cole Wilbur, Trustee, David and Lucile Packard Foundation �Take Action Join Us The Diversity in Philanthropy Project envisions a future in which the diversity of our fie ld and the larger society is an essential consideration in funders· day-to-day strategic decisions and actions. We believe our sector is ready to take important next steps to embrace diverse cultures and advance our quest to be more effective grantmakers. We invite you to join our community of practice and work with us to achieve the full depth and breadth of the many possibilities before us. Our combined efforts will lead to: • Organizational Effectiveness. Research shows that diverse teams create more effective solutions to complex problems. Evidence from philanthropy and other sectors suggests that diversity can improve employee relations, productivity, and customer satisfaction. • External Impact. Globalization is redefining the landscape that shapes our work. When foundations harness diversity, we draw more deeply on the plurality of human experiences and backgrounds, and better equip ourselves to tackle both our nation's and the world's increasingly challenging issues. • Public Responsibility. Societal and political expectations are rising. Maintaining the nation's confidence in our sector requires leadership, accountability, and transparency. We have a public responsibility to demonstrate broader sector-wide commitment to these issues. Inform • Find out more about the independent sector's past and current diversity initiatives, and its thought leadership on inclusivity and effectiveness • Learn more about diversity initiat ives in other sectors • Sign-up for our e-newsletters to stay informed Involve • Attend conferences, workshops, and diversity discussions • Join a learning circle • Participate in sect or-wide diversity surveys Inspire • Share what you learn with your networks • Post your comments and case studies on our website • Find out how your foundation can partner with DPP To learn more about the Diversity in Philanthropy Project and what you can do to get involved, visit www.diversityinphilanthropy.org. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Diversity-in-Philanthropy Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book diversity in philanthropy Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book diversity in philanthropy. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50741 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/b9b543b5f9b853804dc545c13b5c1c7e.pdf 22ca439705c602dd2e4bba07631ab6be PDF Text Text Counci l of M ichi an CMF Foun~ations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. October 3, 2008 To: Diana Sieger, Chairperson & Members of the Board ofTrustees From: Caroline Chambers, Rachel Mraz & Milt Rohwer, Annual Conference Co- Chairs Vicki Rosenberg, Vice President, Education, Communication & External Relations Re: Achieving Michigan 's T ransformation - 36th CMF Annual Conference This year's annual conference builds on last year's theme of Transforming Michigan by examining ways in which Michigan foundations can work with the public, private and nonprofit sector and higher education to Achieve Michigan's Transformation. A copy of the final program is enclosed. There are a number of new elements this year. Most importantly, we are trying to be a "Green" Conference so please help us in reinforcing that goal. For example, for the first time we will not have a conference bag. The program w ill include pockets for materials. We have met our primary Goals for this Conference. First, we have exceeded registration projections with: Member full Non Member full 40 I 4 405 Full Member daily Non Member daily 241 16 257 Daily Second, we have met sp onsorship and exhibitor r evenue ta rgets with: Sponsorship $232,000 Exhibitors 13 @ $17,750 T hird, we h ave a substa ntive a nd diverse program. Feature, concurrent and site session will address: • Grantmaking issues including health care, education reform, climate change, family violence, racial equity grantmaking, African-American and Latino men and boys and neighborhood development • Foundation administration, communications, governance, investments and leadership • Family foundation administration, governance and grantmaking • Community foundation administration, donor development, marketing, grantmaking and operations • An experienced grantmaker workshop on foundation strategy Nationally recognized keynoters will address Michigan's transformation from a variety of perspectives. �• • • • • Journalist Dan Rather will open the conference speaking on the impact of the Presidential Election on Michigan' s Transformation Scott Page, professor, University of Michigan; Ralph Smith, executive vice president, Annie E. Casey Foundation and chair, Council on Foundations; and CMF trustee and W.K. Kellogg Foundation president & CEO, Sterling Speirn will highlight the Monday luncheon p lenary on How Do You Store the Ketchup? an examination of benefits of diversity for foundation effectiveness Breannah Alexander, member, M ichigan Community Service Commission and Craig Ruff, senior policy fellow, Public Sector Consultants, will host Tuesday' s Town Hall on Our Scorecard for Achieving Michigan 's Transformation Bruce Katz, vide president, Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings, Angela Glover Blackwell, founder ofPolicyLink, and Rip Rapson, president, The Kresge Foundation will headline Tuesday' s luncheon p lenary on Our Blueprint for Michigan 's Prosperity And to close the Conference, Tom Beech, president of The Fetzer Institute, will facilitate a conversation with Artist/Philanthropists Judy Coll ins and Ruby Dee on the role of creativity and activism in transformation. We ask that you join us in thanking the more than 30 members of the Conference Committeeeach with a special ribbon on their name badge- for their great help in developing this outstanding program. Finally, this Conference would not be possible without the financial investment of sponsors, members- a number of you- and exhibitors. While they are all listed in the Program and on key signage, please join us in thanking them when you see them during the Conference. �CMF Council of M ichi gan Foundations , Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. ' ' Reforming Healthcare ~ {y~It Annual Conference Mie.hi5a:n '~ T:raan~fo:ramaho:n October 12-14, 2008 ,.., Amway Grand & DeVos Place ....., Grand Rapids Program Guide 4 Learning Journal �Welcome to Grand Rapids and the Council of Michigan Foundations' 36th annual conference. Our theme Achieving Michigan's Transformation builds on our 2007 conference theme and emphasizes the impact philanthropy can have in solving the critical issues facing our state. Just like bees pollinating apple blossoms, Michigan philanthropy uses its expertise, influence, knowhow and relationships to develop new solutions, supported by better policies, resulting in stronger communities. Foundations are well positioned for the challenge of transforming Michigan. If we work together and remain committed to Michigan's future, our efforts will be realized in a bountiful harvest of a revived economy, stronger schools, reformed healthcare, pristine Great Lakes and more. A talented group of your peers serving on the conference committee designed an exceptional program to introduce you to new ideas and ways of working, build your knowledge and skills, inspire you and provide time to reflect and connect with colleagues. Be sure to visit Resource Central to participate in a service project, learn more about CMF and its partners and to talk with each of our exhibitors, all professionals with experience serving foundations. Many thanks go to our sponsors and foundation supporters- their generosity has made it possible to offer such an excellent conference experience. Please join us in thanking them. Enjoy the conference! Caroline Chambers Comerica Charitable Foundation Rachel Mraz Eileen and Brian DeVries Family Foundation Milt Rohwer Frey Foundation f I'.....,.. mich iganfoundations.org �Honorarq l.Htair~ The l!ouneil of Mwfti~m f oundaiion8 i8 plea8e4 io reeo5Tiize '()ill Joftn8{on Ronda ~Hrqker of IU!mnmzoo rut4 Warier Norift of St I5Tiaee a8 Ronorarq l.!ftair8 of Ute 3bift Amzual l.!onferenee. ana Bill Johnston and Ronda Stryker are recipients of the 2008 Mawby Award for Philanthropy. Named for Russell G. Mawby, president emeritus of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, the award recognizes individuals demonstrating a lifelong commitment to encouraging private action for the public good through philanthropy. Bill and Ronda are advocates for philanthropy in southwest Michigan and philanthropic supporters as well through The Ronda E. Stryker and William D. Johnston Foundation. While Bill focuses on supporting scholarships and creating economic development, Ronda is committed to education with a focus on women and nontraditional students. She serves on the boards of Kalamazoo and Spelman Colleges. Bill works closely with Western Michigan University and Southwest Michigan First They are staunch advocates for the Kalamazoo areafund raising; creating new programs to support the Kalamazoo Promise; su pporting endowments for service-learning and the WMU College of Business; and playing a huge role in hundreds of other initiatives to create opportunities where each citizen's dreams can be achieved. Former State Senator Walter North is the recipient of the 2008 Community Foundation Award for Philanthropy that recognizes the thousands of volunteers now involved in building community philanthropy through a network of 65 community foundations serving all 83 Michigan counties. Walter has actively participated in the creation or support of five community foundations - four in the Eastern Region ofthe Upper Peninsula. Known as a terrific mentor, his collaborative spirit is best exemplified by his service on the Community Foundation of the Upper Peninsula Board, on which he successfully led the effort to achieve national standards. Walt's government experience has been instrumental in helping forge new public-private partnerships, supporting the growth of community endowment funds. He understands the value of engaging youth in community building and has underwritten efforts for high school youth grantmakers to attend regional trainings. Walter exemplifies community philanthropy by using his time, talent and financial resources t o make all the communities he touches better. mi ch iganfou nd ation s. org �Our Annual eonf eren~e Ju~i 4oi 4 reener This year. in an effort to be more socially and environmentally responsible. CMF strived to make the conference as green and earth-friendly as possible. This is just another small way we can all participate in transforming Michigan. Here are a few ways we've greened things up: Paper-less, but not Paper-free Biodegradable Pens and Conference Banners While not yet paper-free, we tried to lessen the amount of paper used and distributed in the following ways: The bio-pen attached to your program guide is 80% biodegradable and our large conference banners are printed on biodegradable vinyl. - Conference Program, learning Journal & Roster Plastic Nametag Reuse The program guide is printed on recycled paper and a participant roster was e-mailed to participants prior to the event instead of being included in the print program, reducing the number of program pages by half. Each year, we reuse the plastic nametags returned at the registration booth after the conference. Be sure to stop by and turn yours in at the close of the conference. Recycling - Session Handouts Speakers were asked to refrain from printing session handouts and instead make them available for download on our conference web site. This effort improves the quality, availability and timeliness of handouts and resources and enables participants to print the handouts that are right for them either at home, the office or in the Cyber Cafe during the conference. - Recycling bins for paper, plastic and glass are located throughout the conference for your use. linen & Towel Reuse Program If you are staying at the Amway Grand, we encourage you to use their linen and towel reuse program in your guest room, saving water and energy. Glass & Porcelain for Beverages Bottled water and paper cups will not be used during the conference. Instead, glass and porcelain cups will be available during coffee and snack breaks. - Marketing Our online registration brochure viewer enabled us to print fewer brochures and use a tree in our conference theme instead of using trees to print brochures. Postcards were printed on FSC mixed sources (recycled wood and fiber and wellmanaged forests). michiganfoundations.org �Manq T.furrnk~ ~o our Sp~m~or~. f oundahon Suppor~er~ { Exitibrfor~ General Information .. .. .. . .. . .. .. .. . .. .. . ... ..5 fiVE STAR Resource Central .. .. ..... . .. .. .. ..... .. . .. .. .5 Frey Foundation W.K. Kellogg Foundation Conference At a Glance .. . ...... . .. . ... . .. .. .6-7 Conference Schedule YOUR STAR Sunday, October 12 ............ . .......... ...8 Monday, October 13 .. . ... . .. . .. . ... . .. . ..8-14 Tuesday, October 14 ......................14-19 Site Sessions .. . .. . ... . .. . ...... . .. .. .. . .. .12-13 Acknowledgements ...........................19 Annual Conference Committee . ......... ......20 CMF Staff ...... . ...... .... ...... . ...... . ... ..20 The lies Group at Merrill Lynch THREE STAR Comerica Bank, Wilson Kemp & World Asset Management Comerica Charitable Foundation DTE Energy Foundation The Fetzer Institute MASCO Corporation Foundation Steelcase Foundation The Wege Foundation Officers & Board of Trustees ..................21 Hotel Floor Plan ..............................23 For 2009 sponsorship or exhibitor opportunities, please contact Dave Lindberg at 616.842.7080 or TWO STAR Allegiant Asset Management Charles Stewart Matt Foundation Grand Rapids Community Foundation JPMorgan Chase Foundation & JPMorgan Asset Management The Kresge Foundation Legacy Trust dl indberg@m ichiganfoundati ons.org. ONE STAR Clark Hill PLC Plante & Moran, PLLC Williams Group EXHIJ)ITORS Immersed in community spirit. The Masco Family of Companies salutes the Council of Michigan Foundations for its thoughtful and progressive leadership of Michig~m's philanthropic community. masco.com mic higa nfoundations.org MASCO Allegiant Asset Management BoardSource Bromelkamp Company, LLC Comerica Bank Fifth Third Bank Fund Evaluation Group, LLC Hammond Associates IPEX, Inc. Legacy Trust The lies Group at Merrill Lynch Pathway Partners, LLC Plante & Moran, PLLC Russell Investments New space, New viewsame vision. This fall, t he Grand Rapids Communit y Foundation is �& • . Cyber Cafe Amway Grand Plaza Hotel Check your email or download conference materials in the Ruby room. Printers are also available. Parking Resource CentralYour Knowledge & Networking Hub! Self-parking is available for$16/night and valet parking for $25/night Both parking types offer 24-hour in-and-out access. - __ , ' ' I ' ' ~- Head to the West Concourse/Crown Foyer to do the following: Amenities - Visit exhibitors, each of whom has a proven track record of serving grantmakers. Fill your exhibit card t o be eligible for exciting prizes. This full-service luxury hotel offers boutiques, art galleries, business services and unlimited use of the fitness center for $5/day, per room for up to 4 guests. Wireless Internet is available in common areas. - Shop and browse at the Conference Bookshop & Publication Tables featuring the latest from conference speakers, CMF and our members. A r~w - Experience Vantage Point, a special photo exhibit featuring the Access to Recreation (A2R) projects of the Community Foundation of St. Clair County. A2R is a special initiative of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation, administered by Midwest Community Foundations Ventures', dedicated to providing recreation opportunities for people of all ages and all abilities. - Participate in an AmeriCorps service project to make fleece blankets for children and youth entering foster care. AmeriCorps members and program staff will be on hand to lead the activity. - Get the latest information and resources from CMF partners, including the Attorney General's Office-Charitable Trust, Johnson Center for Philanthropy at Grand Valley State University and Michigan Nonprofit Association. - Mor~ T.ftin~s ... Name Badges- Please welcome new CMF members, wearing "New Member" ribbons and first-time attendees, wearing gold star stickers. Message Center - For messages, please go to the Conference Registration desk located in the Center Concourse of the Amway Grand Plaza Hotel. Special Services -In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, CMF will make all reasonable efforts to accommodate persons with disabilities. If you need assistance or have dietary restrictions that you did not note on the conference registration form, please see CMF staff at the Conference Registration desk in the Center Concourse at the Amway. We will make every effort to accommodate your request. Non-Solicitation Policy- CMF policy prohibits conference participants and vendors from any form of solicitation of its members during the conference. This policy does not apply when a member explicitly invites a solicitation. Grab a beverage or snack during noted break times. Photographer- Please contact Becky Noricks at CMF (616.842.7080) by October 24, 2008 if you prefer not to have photos in which you appear used in CMF informational or promotional publications. s mich iganfoundations.org �3:00 to 7:00p.m.- Conference Registration Open DeVos Lobby 4:00 to 5:00p.m.- Opening Keynote: The Presidential Election and Michigan's Transformation Steel case A Speaker: Da n Rather, award-winning journalist, author and philanthropist 5:00 to 6:00 p.m.- Break 6:00 to 7:00 p.m.- Opening Reception Secchia Lobby 7:00 to 9:30p.m.- Dinner & Capitol Steps Performance Steelcase B 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.- Conference Registrati on Open Center Concourse - Communications Skill Building 101 - Vandenberg B Bridging Your Family Foundation's Generational Divide - Pearl Family Violence as an Unseen Cost of Michigan's Failing Economy - Emerald A Racial Equity Grantmaking - Gerald Ford 11:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m.- Community .·~~ Foundation Concurrent Sessions ~ Governance 101 for Trustees - Haldane Becoming the "Go To" Place for Charitable Gifts - Grandview Development Essentials - Thornapple 12:30 to 2:00 p.m. - Luncheon Keynote: How Do You Store the Ketchup? - Ambassador Ballroom Speaker & Responders: Scott Page, professor of complex systems, political science and economics, University of Michigan; Ralph Smith, executive vice president, Annie E. Casey Foundation, and chair, Council on Foundations; Sterling Speirn, president & CEO, W.K. Kellogg Foundation 2:00 to 2:30 p.m.- Break Cyber Cafe Open - Ruby 2:30 to 5:00p.m.- CMF Board Meeting - Pearl 7:30 to 8:15a.m.- Newcomers Orientation Breakfast Vandenberg B 7:30 to 8:45a.m.- General Breakfast and Annual Members' Meeting - Ambassador Ballroom 8:45 to 6:00 p.m.- Resource Central Open West Concourse/Crown Foyer 8:45 to 9:00 a.m.- Break 9:00 to 10:30 a.m. - Feature Sessions - Alig ning Forces for Health Quality - Vandenberg A Funding Public Education Reform - Gerald Ford - The Impact of Climate Change on the Great Lakes - Governors 10:30 to 11:00 a.m. - Break 11:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m.- CMF Advisory Cabinet Meeting 11:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m.- Concurrent Sessions Navigating Today's Investment Issue M aze Va ndenberg A Starting and Ending the Employment Relationship Right - Emerald B mic higa nfoundations.org 2:30 to 5:00 p.m.- Site Sessions A Holistic Approach to Ed ucation - Dr. M artin Luther King J r. Leadership Academy Community Information in the Digital AgeGrand Rapids Public Library Foreclosure's Impact on Michigan Families and Neighborhoods- Inner City Christian Federation How Geographic Information Systems lGIS) Technology Informs Local Decision MakingJohnson Center for Philant hropy and Nonprofit Leadership In This Together .. . Learn, Share, Laugh- Gilda's Club Grand Rapids The Medical M ile- An Economic DriverSpectrum Hospital Meijer Heart Center 2:30 to 5:00 p.m. -Workshops Assessing and Strengthening Your Foundation's Strategy - Emerald A Community Foundation Op~rating Models ·~ l2:30 to 4:00 p.m.) - Grandv1ew · 2:30 to 5:00 p.m.- User Groups 2:30 to 4:00 p.m. - Pearl User Group - Emerald B 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. - eGrant.net User Group Emerald B �Mondaq. Octobe-r 1~. Ai A dlan~e- <:5J{q Amwaq dram[ Plaza Hoie-1 ', _ j._.} ~ ---- -~ 9:00 to 10:30 a.m.- Community "NJ,• Foundation Concurrent Sessions . :llTt. Community Leadership for Smaller Foundations Grandview A De-Mystifying School Financial Aid for College and Post-Secondary Education - Thornapple Using Generational Messages to Reach Donors of All Ages - Grandview B-C 4:00 to 5:30 p.m. - Community Foundation -~ CEO Meeting - Haldane 5:00 to 6:30 p.m.- Break 6:30 to 9:30 p.m.- Green Gala at the GRAM Grand Ra pids Art Museum 8:00 p.m. - Community Foundation Reception _. at the Grand Rapids Community Foundation -~ 10:30 to 11:00 a.m. - Break (pre-registration required) 11:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. -Concurrent Sessions Considering International Grantmaking as a Family Foundation - Emerald A Funders Collaborating on Neighborhood Development - Governors Michigan Philanthropy in 3-D - Vandenberg B Office Policies, Procedures and Protocols Roundtable - Vandenberg A Transforming Evaluation - Strategies for Results Pearl Project Streamline: Drowning in Paperwork, Distracted from Purpose- Emerald B Tue-sdaq. Odobe>r 14. A~ A l1hrnee> Amwaq l1ran.d Plaza_~{e>l ,~ 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. ' -Lea<~<' Conferenc e Registration Open - Center Concourse Resourc e Centra l Open - West Concourse/ Crown Foyer Cyber Cafe Open - Ruby 7:00 to 8:00 a.m. Breakfast and Roundtables Ambassador Ball room Community Foundation Program Officer 11:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m.- Community --~• Foundation Concurrent Sessions ..ftliiJl7._ 15 Great Marketing Ideas - Haldane ...,_ Building Unrestricted Endowment Assets Grandview Matching Donors with Community Needs - Berkey Breakfast - Haldane 8:00 to 8:45a.m.- Town Hall Keynote: Our Scorecard for Achieving Michigan's Transformation - Ambassador Ballroom Moderators: Breannah Alexander, member, Mic higan Community Servic e Commission and CMF's Michigan Community Foundations' Youth Project Committee; Cra ig Ruff, senior policy fellow, Public Sector Consultants 12:15 to 12:30 p.m.- Break 12:30 to 2:00 p.m.- Luncheon Keynote: Our Blueprint for Michigan's Prosperity - Ambassador Ballroom Speakers: Angela Glover Blackwell, founder & CEO, PolicyLink; Bruce Katz, vice president, Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings; Rip Rapson, president, The Kresge Foundation 8:45 to 9:00 a.m.- Break 9:00 to 10:30 a.m. - Concurrent Sessions 10 Essential Responsibilities of Foundation Board Chairs - Emerald A Family Foundation Missteps - Staying out of Hot Water - Pearl Funding Strategies to Improve the Lives of African-American and Latino Men and Boys Imperial Ballroom Global Sustainability Investing - Emerald B How Grantmakers Can Join the Web 2.0 Revolution - Vandenberg B Unlocking Creativity and Inspiring Ideas through Improvisation - Berkey 2:00 to 2:30 p.m.- Break 2:30 to 4:00 p.m.- Closing Keynote: Transformation Requires Creativity and Activism - Pantlind Ball room Speakers: Judy Collins, singer, songwriter & philanthropist; Ruby Dee, actress & philanthropist; Thomas Beech, president & CEO, The Fetzer Institute 1 mich iganfoundations.org �Sun.daq. Odobe-r 12 Pe-Vo~ Plawe- eonve-niion ee-nie-r Mon.daq . Od obe-r 13 Amwaq dram[ Plaza Hoie-1 3:00 to 7:00p.m. - Conference Registration Open 7:00a.m. to 6:00p.m. Conference Registration Open- Center Concourse Cyber Cafe Open- Ruby DeVos Lobby 4:00 to 5:00 p.m. - Opening Keynote: The Presidential Election and Michigan's Transformation Steelcase A Award winning journalist, author and philanthropist. Dan Rather will discuss the upcoming Presidential Election and what it might mean for Michigan. A veteran White House correspondent, who covered President Ford, and author of The American Dream, Rather confirms what our founding fathers always believed: "that we are a country of visionaries, in ways big and small." How is vision essential to Michigan's transformation- especially when it is a national vision led by a new president? Launching our conference theme of Achieving Michigan's Transformation, this session will address how we can all be visionaries for Michigan and the nation. Speaker: Dan Rather, award-winning journalist, author and philanthropist Moderator: Milt Rohwer, president, Frey Foundation 7:30 to 8:15a.m. - Newcomers Orientation Breakfast Vandenberg B (pre-registration required) New CMF members and 1st time conference attendees will meet CMF staff and learn more about available member benefits. At 8:15 the group will join the Annual Members' Meeting. 7:30 to 8:45 a.m. - General Breakfast and Annual Members' Meeting- Ambassador Ballroom 8:45 to 6:00 p.m. - Resource Central Open West Concourse/ Crown Foyer 8:45 to 9:00 a.m. - Break Head to Resource Central to visit with exhibitors and partners, buy a few books at our Conference Bookshop or participate in an AmeriCorps service project. Or, check your e-mail in the Cyber Cafe in the Ruby room. Underwritten by the Frey Foundation 9:00 to 10:30 a.m.- Feature Sessions 5:00 to 6:00 p.m. - Break Aligning Forces for Health Quality- Vandenberg A 6:00 to 7:00p.m.- Opening Reception- Secchia Lobby 7:00 to 9:30p.m.- Dinner & Entertainment Steelcase B Enjoy an original scripted show on the 2008 Election by the Capitol Steps- a musical theatre group composed of former Senate staffers satirizing the very people and places that employed them. They've been putting the mock in democracy since 1981. Underwritten by the Grand Rapids Community Foundation mic higa nfoundations.org Across America and Michigan there are serious differences by region and race between the health care people should receive and the care they actually receive. While poor health care is a national problem, fixing it requires local solutions and local cooperation. Join representatives from Michigan's two sites in the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's Aligning Forces for Quality national initiative to discuss how diverse teams are coming together to try t o make a difference. Speakers: Vernice Davis Anthony, president & CEO, Greater Detroit Area Health Council; Bruce Siegel, director, Center for Health Care Quality, George Washington University; Lady Zwarensteyn, president, Alliance for Health Moderator: Marianne Udow, director, The Center for Healthcare Quality and Transformation �9:00 to 10:30 a.m.- Feature Sessions cont 11:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. - Concurrent Sessions Funding Public Education Reform- Gerald Ford Improving public education is a national priority, but the education system is complex and public dollars far exceed private investment. Effective grantmakers need to think carefully about how they can affect change by using and leveraging private foundation funding . Learn new ways to improve your philanthropic efforts and ideas that might change your assumptions about engaging in education reform. Speakers: Kati Haycock, president, Education Trust; Ralph Smith, executive vice president, Annie E. Casey Foundation, and chair, Council on Foundations Moderator: Carol Goss, president & CEO, The Skillman Foundation Underwritten by The Skillman Foundation Navigating Today's Investment Issue Maze Vandenberg A The recent credit crisis emphasized the importance of understanding investment risk. Learn how various investment classes are affected by the ever changing market environment and what you and/or your investment committee need to do to ensure the security of your investments. Speakers: Bruce Konstant, vice president, Institutional Portfolio Strategist, Bank of America; Alan Ochalek, vice president, Comerica Asset Management Moderator: Diane Wynsma Hyland, vice president & trust officer, U.S. Trust, Bank of America Underwritten by the Carl F. Reitz Fund for Investment Education The Impact of Climate Change on the Great Lakes Governors The Earth's climate is warming, and scientists agree that observed temperature increases are the result of human activity. Explore the predicted impacts of climate change on the Great Lakes region, including ramifications for economic sectors, communities, people and wildlife. Learn how and why people from diverse walks of life are involved in the search for solutions and how philanthropy can help. Speakers: Rosina Bierbaum, dean, School of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Michigan; Larry Schweiger, president and CEO, National Wildlife Federation Moderator: Lois DeBacker, program director, The Kresge Foundation Underwritten by The Kresge Foundation 10:30to 11:00 a.m.- Break Head to Resource Central to grab a snack, visit with exhibitors and partners, buy a few books at our Conference Bookshop or participate in an AmeriCorps service project. Or, check your e-mail in the Cyber Cafe in the Ruby room. Starting and Ending the Employment Relationship Right- Emerald B What legal and employment policies are necessary to guide your organization through its relationships with employees? Walk through a model processapplication, interview, hiring, discipline and termination- learning best practices and policies to recruit top-notch employees, manage your relationships with them and reduce organizational risks. Speakers: Jennifer Buckley, member, Clark Hill PLC; Anne-Marie Welch, associate, Clark Hill PLC Moderator: John Schneider, member, Clark Hill PLC Allegiant Asset Management Company proudly supports Michigan Foundations. For more inf orm ation on A llegiant , please contad: ~~ Keith Weigel 248-729-831\11 Craig Haynes 248-729-831\3 legian . Allt:giant ~t Managt:mc:nt Comruny is an SECrt:gisu::r«< im~Stnl<"ntadvisor. Cl2008 CS-30AS2 11:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. - CMF Advisory Cabinet Meeting mic higa nfoundations.org �11:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. - Concurrent Sessions cont Communications Skill Building 101 -Vandenberg B Develop your skills and get advice from leading communications professions on a range of topics including web sites, annual reports, media relations and more. Speakers: Michael Gallagher, editorial consultant, Council of Michigan Foundations; William Hanson, director of communications & technology, The Skillman Foundation; Mitchell Hurst. team leader new media, C.S. Mott Foundation; Wesley Maurer, publisher, St Ignace News and trustee, Mackinac Island Community Foundation; Gloria Royal, vice president marketing communications, Kalamazoo Community Foundation; Cynthia Shaw, communications director, The Kresge Foundation; Bruce Trachtenberg, executive director, Communications Network; Michael VanBuren, communications manager, W.K. Kellogg Foundation Moderator: Dianne Price, director of public affairs, W .K. Kellogg Foundation Bridging Your Family Foundation's Generational Divide- Pearl Family foundations often struggle with being "multi-generational." Learn about the generational characteristics related to philanthropy, participate in interactive exercises to help your family bridge the generational divide and hear one family's story about how they are addressing these challenges. Speakers: Betsy Upton Stover, trustee, FrederickS. Upton Foundation; Roberta King, vice president public relations and marketing, Grand Rapids Community Foundation Moderator: Lisa Cripps, director, FrederickS. Upton Foundation Family Violence as an Unseen Cost of Michigan's Failing Economy- Emerald A Families under stress react in various ways when the head of the household loses a job or a significant amount of income. In certain circumstances, women and children are the likely targets of violence as a result. Hear more about the documented risk of mic higa nfoundations.org violence and opportunities for action to protect families in Michigan's current and difficult economic times. Speakers: Rosa lynn Bliss, director, KidsFirst at St John's Home; Shannon Garrett, Michigan field director, The White House Project Moderator: DeDe Esque, president & CEO, Nokomis Foundation Racial Equity Grantmaking- Gerald Ford Race is one component to consider in diversity and inclusive practice, dominating much of the public discourse. Debates range from the efficacy of colorblind decision making to institutional barriers, overt racism, to personal responsibility. An interactive panel will discuss the age-old question: "what's race got to do with it?" and how racially diverse boards, leadership, staff and cultural competency can increase grantmakers' effectiveness and ability to serve racially diverse communities. Speakers: Susan Batten, senior associate, Equity, Diversity & Inclusion, Annie E. Casey Foundation; Lisa Jackson, vice president, research, Center for Effective Philanthropy; Johnny Lee Jenkins, Jr., Michigan program officer, Arcus Foundation Moderator: Renee Branch, director, Diversity and Inclusive Practices, Council on Foundations Our commitment to the community... is a never-ending story. At DTE Energy, we believe being part of a community is more than simply doing business there. lt's about doing our part to help that community and our customers thrive. That's w hy through ongoing employee volunteerism, environmental stewardship, educational resources, corporate d onations and sponsorship activiti es at the grassroots level, we will continue to support programs and initiatives that strengthen and enhance the communities we serve .. . so we can all live happily ever after. T he Powe r of Your Comm uni ty ~!!n~~;j:J e a DT• • �11 :00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m.- Community-· Foundation Concurrent Sessions · ' Governance 101 for Trustees - Haldane This "must attend" session will address the common areas all trustees, new or seasoned, inquire about: job description, responsibilities, legal requirements and board "best practices." Speakers: Pete Christ, CMF community foundation consultant & interim director, The Grantmaking School, Johnson Center for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Leadership; Barbara Willyard, executive director, Community Foundation for Northeast Michigan Moderator: Ann Tabor, president, Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Becoming the "Go To" Place for Charitable Gifts Grandview Learn the ins-and-outs of some of the more complicated, but rewarding scenarios that can make your community foundation the number one "go to" place for charitable gifts of all types and sizes. Eight donor case studies on topics like international grantmaking, real estate gifts, planned giving and more will be presented in this interactive session. Speaker: Bryan K. Clontz, senior consultant. Ekstrom & Associates Moderator: Jonse Young, planned and major gifts director, Grand Rapids Community Foundation Development Essentials - Thorn apple Learn about asset development fundamentals - gifts acceptance, prospecting, professional advisors, planned gifts, donor relations, etc. - from two seasoned development professionals, one urban and one rural. Speakers: Ann Fergemann, vice president donor relations, Kalamazoo Community Foundation; Bonnie Hildreth, president Barry Community Foundation Moderator: Robert Jordan, philanthropic services officer, Fremont Area Community Foundation 12:30 to 2:00 p.m. - Luncheon Keynote: How Do You Store the Ketchup? - Ambassador Ballroom Author of The Difference, Professor Scott Page believes that when we peer out of our silos and see people doing strange things with the ketchup, we should see opportunity and possibility. He shows- using logic not meta phor - that progress depends as much on our collective differences as it does on our individuai iQ scores. Page will share his fundamental insightthat in problem solving, diversity is powerful stuff- with foundation leader panelists in a provocative discussion that will change the way we think about diversity and its role in Michigan's Transformation. Speaker: Scott Page, professor of complex systems, political science and economics, University of Michigan Responders: Ralph Smith, executive vice president, Annie E. Casey Foundation, and chair, Council on Foundations; Sterling Speirn, president & CEO, W.K. Kellogg Foundation Moderator: Diana Sieger, president, Grand Rapids Community Foundation Underwritten by Comerica Bank and the WK. Kellogg Foundation 2:00 to 2:30 p.m. - Break Head to Resource Central to visit with exhibitors and partners, buy a few books at our Conference Bookshop or participate in an AmeriCorps service project. Or, check your e-mail in the Cyber Cafe in the Ruby room. 2:30 to 5:00p.m. - CMF Board Meeting - Pearl 11 mi chiganfoundations.org �2:30 to 5:00p.m. - Site Sessions (pre-registration required) Sign-up at conference registration if you are not already registered. Buses and walking guides for all sessions will depart from the Pantlind Lobby at 2:30 p.m. Buses underwritten by Dyer-lves Foundation, Fremont Area Community Foundation and The Sebastian Foundation. A Holistic Approach to Education- Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Leadership Academy Experience a brand new pre-K-8 school (complete with rooftop garden) with a range of programs to provide multiple services to children and their families, including tutoring, after school programs and access to cultural experiences. Speakers: Bernard Taylor, superintendent, Grand Rapids Public Schools; Carrie Tellerico, principal, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. Leadership Academy; Kurt Unangst, family resource specialist, Michigan Department of Human Services Moderator: Ron Koehler, assistant superintendent for organizational and community initiatives, Kent Intermediate School District Community Information in the Digital Age Grand Rapids Public Library Public libraries are "go to" information hubs in communities. Explore how libraries are using new methods of collecting, organizing and providing access to information and how residents can be empowered as content creators using Web 2.0 tools. Speakers: Kolene Allen, web branch manager, and Marcia Warner, executive director, Grand Rapids Public Library; Laurie Cirivello, executive director, and George Wietor, web 2.0 project director, Grand Rapids Community Media Center Moderator: Lynne Ferrell, program officer, Frey Foundation Foreclosure's Impact on Michigan Families and Neighborhoods- Inner City Christian Federation Neighborhood revitalization throughout Michigan is now jeopardized by the foreclosure crisis. The cost to the neighborhood and community let alone the family in dealing with foreclosure is huge. How can foundations help keep families in their homes? What mic higa nfoundations.org are strategies for dealing with abandoned homes? These questions and more will be tackled during this visit to the historic, LEED-certified and newly restored Inner City Christian Federation headquarters -the former D.A. Blodgett Home for Children. Speakers:Tracie Coffman, financial counseling manager, Home Repair Services; Wendy Lewis Jackson, program officer, The Kresge Foundation; Jeff Jahr, senior program officer, Fremont Area Community Foundation; Sue Ortiz, director of housing and family services, Inner City Christian Federation Moderator: Laurie Craft, program director, Grand Rapids Community Foundation In This Together... Learn, Share, Laugh- Gilda's Club Grand Rapids See the lovely pastoral campus of Gilda's Club Grand Rapids- an organization providing a community space for people diagnosed with cancer and their loved ones to gather for support, education and fun. Learn about recent research demonstrating the importance of social and emotional support in successful cancer treatment and a new Children's Grief Program for children dealing with loss. Speakers: Leann Arkema, president, Gilda's Club Grand Rapids; participants from Children's Grief Program and Sister-to-Sister Support Group Moderator: Dave Sebastian, trustee, The Sebastian Foundation How Geographic Information Systems (GIS) Technology Informs Local Decision Making Johnson Center for Philanth ropy and Nonprofit Leadership The GIS tool provides rich data that can drive planning and programming decisions. Learn how mapping has helped West Michigan nonprofits and grantmakers as they work collaboratively t o solve community challenges and try your hand at mapping your community. Speakers: Jeremy Pyne, GIS specialist, and Gustavo Rotondaro, associate director and GIS manager, Community Research Institute, Johnson Center for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Leadershi p Moderator: Lee Nelson Webber, program director, Dyer-lves Foundation �Mondaq. Octobe-r 1~. ooni. - Amwaq 4rand Plaza Hofe-1 2:30 to 5:00 p.m. - Site Sessions cont. The Medical Mile - An Economic Driver Spectrum Hospital Meijer Heart Center Check out the new Meijer Heart Center and the activity next door as the new DeVos Children's Hospital rises from the ground. Discuss the regional economic impact of these facilities and others including the Lemmon-Holton Cancer Pavilion, Van Andel Institut e and Michigan State University medical school and how this collaborative life sciences corridor is driving innovation. Speakers: Michael Freed, executive vice president & CFO, Spectrum Health; Steve Heacock, chief administrative officer and general counsel, Van Andel Institute; Marsha Rappley, dean, Michigan State University College of Human Medicine Moderator: Ginny Vander Hart executive director, Douglas and Maria DeVos Foundation 2:30 to 5:00 p.m. - Workshops Assessing and Strengthening Your Foundation's Strategy- Emerald A How do foundations maximize their impact? What is the role of strategy? Is your foundation strategic? Are you? This interactive workshop, based on the Center for Effective Philanthropy's (CEP) ground breaking research on decision making at foundations, will help you answer these questions and more. Learn the four categories of decision makers ranging from nonstrategic to strategic, where you currently sit on CEP's strategy continuum and practical solutions for getting to where you'd like to be t o increase your foundation's impact and effectiveness. Speakers: Lisa Jackson, vice president, research, Center for Effective Philanthropy; Scott Page, professor of complex systems, political science and economics, University of Michigan Moderator: Jenee Velasquez, executive director, Herbert H. and Grace A. Dow Foundation Community Foundation Operating -Models (2:30 to 4:00p.m.) - Grandview Many community foundations, including the Grand Rapids Community Foundation, are using operating models for donor development, grantmaking, fiscal oversight and leadership. These models enable users to discover and analyze how they spend their time with development efforts vs. other activities like strategic planning, board visioning and financia l sustainability. Learn how your foundation could use these models in this highly interactive session. Speaker: Bryan Clontz, senior consultant, Ekstrom & Associates Moderator: Jonse Young, planned and major gifts director, Grand Rapids Community Foundation 2:30 to 5:00p.m.- User Groups 2:30 to 4:00p.m. - Pearl User Group - Emerald B Fifty Michigan foundations use First Pearl, Community Pearl and Pearl to manage operations. Share your experiences with others using this grant fundraising and accounting software or learn if it's right for you. Hear about a new free update that includes Filter Builder- a tool for designing filters with little technical knowledge and integrating information from Guidestar.org and Outl ook into Pearl - and preview a new concept called Workflow Processing in its beginning stages. Speaker: Henry Bromelkamp, president, Bromelkamp Company, LLC 4:00 to 5:00p.m.- eGrant net User Group- Emerald B Several Michigan f oundations have chosen eGrant.net for managing online scholarship and/or grant applications. Come discuss how your application cycle fared this year, ideas for enhancements, or questions about online applications and reports. Speaker: Henry Bromelkamp, president. Bromelkamp Company, LLC 4:00 to 5:30p.m.- Community -Foundation CEO Meeting - Haldane · Underwritten by the Williams Group · 5:00 to 6:30 p.m. - Break mi ch ig anfou nd ati on s.org �6:30 to 9:30p.m.- Green Gala at the GRAM Grand Rapids Art Museum Enjoy a special evening of local food, visual arts, music from the Emmy-nominated Grand Rapids Symphony and learn more about the Grand Rapids Art Museum's (GRAM) certification as the first LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) certified art museum in the world. The GRAM is a short walk from the Amway. CMF staff will be available at the registration desk to provide directions. Limited transportation will be available for those who do not wish to walk. Please inquire at the registration desk for more details. Underwritten by the Wege Foundation 8:00 p.m. - Community Foundation Reception at the Grand Rapids Community Foundation (pre-registration required) -'·~· ~ The Grand Rapids Community Foundation invites community foundation staff and trustee colleagues to a private reception and tour at its new office housed in a historic and restored building called the " Icehouse" (185 Oakes St. SW). Underwritten by the Grand Rapids Community Foundation Tue>gdaq. Odobe>r 14 Amwaq 4rand Plaza Hofe>l 7:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. Conference Registration Open- Center Concourse Resource Central Open- West Concourse/ Crown Foyer Cyber Cafe Open - Ruby 7:00 to 8:00 a.m. - Breakfast and Roundtables Ambassador Ballroom Grab some breakfast at the buffet and sit at a table with a table tent on a topic you'd like to discuss. Don't see a topic you like? Choose your own! Markers and blank table tents will be available. 7:00 to 8:00a.m. - Community Foundation -~ Program Officer Breakfast- Haldane · · t 8:00 to 8:45a.m.- Town Hall Keynote: Our Scorecard for Achieving Michigan's TransformationAmbassador Ballroom In spring 2007, the Center for Michigan began asking residents how well Michigan is transforming its economy, government and social systems during this complex time of change, challenge and global competition as part of its Michigan's Defining Moment (MDM) campaign. In this session, conference attendees will participate in an MDM Community Conversation and become part of the 10,000 residents the campaign plans to engage by 2010. An Envision Michigan story contest winner will also share his essay of hopeful vision for Michigan's future. Moderators: Breannah Alexander, member, Michigan Community Service Commission and CMF's Michigan Community Foundations' Youth Project Committee; Craig Ruff, senior policy fellow, Public Sector Consultants Host: Caroline Chambers, president, Comerica Charitable Foundation Underwritten by the Come rica Charitable Foundation 8:45 to 9:00 a.m. - Break Head to Resource Central to visit with exhibitors and partners, buy a few books at our Conference Bookshop or participate in an AmeriCorps service project Or, check your e-mail in the Cyber Cafe in the Ruby room. Manq Hmnk~ io ~--·._._ our Annual {, ~: eonfe-:re-nee- eommi:He-e-. mic higa nfoundations.org �9:00 to 10:30 a.m.- Concurrent Sessions 10 Essential Responsibilities of Foundation Board Chairs- Emerald A Becoming a board chair can be both daunting and exciting. And, few roles are more significant in ensuring a foundation's success. In response to member requests, CMF partnered with BoardSourcethe nation's number one source on board governance -to create a new resource called 10 Essential Responsibilities for Foundation Board Chairs. Learn about the 10 essential responsibilities and dig deeper into this topic with colleagues. The session will be helpful for new board chairs or as a refresher for more seasoned board chairs. Speaker: Marla Bobowick, consultant, BoardSource Moderator: John Colina, president, Colina Foundation Speakers:Tonya Allen, vice president program, The Skillman Foundation; Randell McShepard, director of community affairs, RPM International, Inc.; Phillip Thomas, senior program officer, Community Development, Chicago Community Trust Moderator: Lisa Cylar Miller, special projects officer, The Skillman Foundation For making a difference M ERRILL LYNCH Family Foundation Missteps - Staying out of Hot Water- Pearl Most mistakes family foundations make are inadvertent. Self-dealing dos and don'ts are often counterintuitive. Explore some of the basic areas where family foundation board members might get into trouble through a skit developed, written and performed by family foundation trustees. Speaker: Marguerite Griffin, senior vice president & national director of philanthropic services, The Northern Trust Company Moderator: Elizabeth Dole, vice president & secretary, Dole Family Foundation applauds the COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS for helping to make a difference in our community. And that inspires us all. 989-791-8493 Funding Strategies to Improve the Lives of AfricanAmerican and Latino Men and Boys - Imperial Ballroom Hear about several foundations' efforts in Detroit, Cleveland and Chicago to improve the lives of AfricanAmerican/Latino men and boys in the U.S. and the results of a recent public policy think tank report examining the anti-educational messages many African-American youth face and proposed strategies to combat those messages. Afterwards, discuss possible collaborative opportunities for Michigan funders to serve this population in the future. OR 1-866-260-6235 MERRILL LYNCH 4805 TOWNE CENTRE ROAD, SUITE 200 SAGINAW, Ml 48604 THE ILES GROUP ~ Merrill Lynch ©2007 Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated. Member, SIPC. 1S mich iganfoundations.org �Tue>gdaq. Odobe>r 14. oont - A.mwaq 4ranJ Plaza Hoie>l 9:00 to 10:30 a.m. - Concurrent Sessions cont. Speaker: Mary Jane Pories, president, Fish ladder Inc. Moderator: Shannon Polk, associate program officer, C.S. Mott Foundation Underwritten by the W.K. Kellogg Foundation Global Sustainability Investing- Emerald B Sustainability in investing is the degree to which a company addresses the social and environmental needs of the present without compromising the quality of life of future generations. This investment approach involves rewarding companies who proactively and positively address human rights, environmental, governance and other issues instead of boycotting "sin stocks." Learn how to incorporate this area into your investment policy and how to find companies meeting these criteria. Speakers: Peter Jacobs, senior vice president, Northern Trust Investments; Eric Fernald, director of research, KLD Research and Analytics, Inc. Moderator: Tamara Bailey, vice president, Northern Trust Bank, FSB 9:00 to 10:30 a.m.- Community - Foundation Concurrent Sessions · · · Community Leadership for Smaller FoundationsGrandview A This nuts and bolts session will give CEOs and trustees a checklist for determining when your foundation is ready to tackle a community initiative, pitfalls to avoid and a hands-on plan requiring little time, money or staff, to guide your foundation successfully and smoothly into a community leadership role. Speaker: Ann Tabor, president, Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Moderator: Chris Smith, program officer, Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan How Grantmakers Can Join the Web 2.0 Revolution Vandenberg B Web 2.0 tools and technology offer tremendous opportunities for foundations to reach and interact with target audiences. Come take a closer look at Web 2.0 and its exciting potential for your foundation. Speakers: Lynn Labieniec, CEO, Beaconfire Consulting; Amanda St. Pierre, PR & marketing specialist, Grand Rapids Community Foundation; Susan Trabucchi, senior program officer; The Fetzer Institute Moderator: Mitch Hurst, team leader-new media, C.S. Mott Foundation De-Mystifying School Financial Aid for College and Post-Secondary Education - Thornapple Learn about the college/university financial aid process, including how FAFSA results are used and how financial aid packages are put together. Presenters will assist foundation scholarship administrators with how to best evaluate an applicant's financial need and how to maximize foundation scholarship impact. Participants will then explore how financial aid departments and scholarship providers can best work together to improve student access to post-secondary education. Speakers: Justin Draeger, assistant director for communications, National Association of Student Financial Aid Administrators; JoAnn Litton, associate director of financial aid, Grand Valley State University Moderator: Marcy Joy, program officer and scholarship coordinator, Community Foundation for Muskegon County Unlocking Creativity and Inspiring Ideas through Improvisation- Berkey Leaders today need to be agile, innovative, collaborative and able to deal with the unexpected. This highly interactive session will explore how the tools of improvisation can unlock new ways of thinking, communicating and "being" -leading to heightened innovation, improved communication and less stress and negativity. Participants will learn exercises to foster creative risk-taking and teamwork, improve decision making and encourage new ideas in the workplace. mic higa nfoundations.org 16 �9:00 to 10:30 a.m. - Community -Foundation Concurrent Sessions cont. · u · ' Using Generational Messages to Reach Donors of All Ages- Grandview 8-C Knowing why people of different generations think and behave differently is important to effective donor communications. Learn about the traits of five American generations as they relate to philanthropy: what events shaped them, what they value and what motivates them in their giving. Speaker: Roberta King, vice president public relations and marketing, Grand Rapids Community Foundation Moderator: Jonse Young, planned and major gifts director, Grand Rapids Community Foundation 10:30to 11:00 a.m.- Break Head to Resource Central to grab a snack, visit with exhibitors and partners, buy a few books at our Conference Bookshop or participate in an AmeriCorps service project. Or, check your e-mail in the Cyber Cafe in the Ruby room. 11:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m.- Concurrent Sessions Considering International Grantmaking as a Family Foundation- Emerald A More family foundations are making grants internationally, discovering that a small amount of money can make a big impact. Trends suggest that next generation trustees are also highly interested in grantmaking abroad. Hear success stories from several families who are already giving in Africa, the Middle East, Latin America and Europe. Learn about international grantmaking's unique attributes, how your foundation can start giving internationally and how larger private foundations can be important partners in the process. Speakers: Marguerite Griffin, senior vice president & national director of philanthropic services, The Northern Trust Company; Carol Paine-McGovern, president, Paine Family Foundation; Douglas Bitonti Stewart, executive director, Max M. & Marjorie S. Fisher Foundation Moderator: William F.L. Moses, senior program officer, The Kresge Foundation Funders Collaborating on Neighborhood Development Governors Learn about the intricacies of partnerships among foundations, municipalities and community partners to advance a common neighborhood agenda. Gain insight into challenges facing decaying neighborhoods and why resources from multiple sources are necessary for systemic change. Panelists will share stories about taking risks in partnerships, high stakes grantmaking and the importance of credibility with stakeholders. They will also address the need for state and regional level grants to address issues in targeted communities. Speakers:Tonya Allen, vice president program, The Skillman Foundation; Christine Kageff, vice president philanthropy and community relations, JPMorgan Chase Bank; Laura Trudeau, program director, The Kresge Foundation Moderator: Neal Hegarty, director of the Flint area program, C.S. Mott Foundation Michigan Philanthropy in 3-D- Vandenberg B Recent polls indicate that few civic leaders understand the multifaceted work or value of foundations. Why does this matter t o your foundation and t o philanthropy's efforts t o transform Michigan? Learn about an innovative state pilot to engage outside leaders in Michigan philanthropy and what your foundation can do t o help. Speakers: Mark Sedway, director, Philanthropy Awareness Initiative; Karen Aldridge-Eason, foundation liaison, Office of the Foundation Liaison; Vicki Rosenberg, vice president education, communications & external relations, Council of Michigan Foundations Moderator: David Egner, president & CEO, Hudson-Webber Foundation Job well done! J.P. Morgan Asset Management is pleased to recognize t he Council of Michigan Foundations. We applaud your efforts to enhance philanthropy in the state of Michigan. Michael Barry 313-225-1249 J.P. Morgan Asset Management is the marketing name for the asset management businesses of JPMorgan chase & co. and it affiliates worldwide. ll 2008 JPMorgan chase & co. 11 J.P. Morgan Asset Management mich iganfoundations.org �Tue>gdaq. Odobe>r 14. oont - A.mwaq 4ranJ Plaza Hoie>l 11:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m. - Concurrent Sessions cont Office Policies, Procedures and Protocols Roundtable Vandenberg A Administrative and support staff often have the most experience with solving workplace operational challenges since they serve on the front lines each day. Join support staff colleagues to share ideas and solutions you've implemented in your organization in areas like using technology to effectively manage projects, creative human resources approaches, unique document retention policies and more. Moderator: Heather Dombrowski, operations manager, The Skillman Foundation Transforming Evaluation- Strategies for Results Pearl Logic models provide a supportive technique for evaluation design. Learn how to best structure information collection and reporting requirements and clarify evaluation questions to grantees. Speakers: Meg Blinkiewicz, president Michigan Association for Evaluation; Lisa Wyatt Knowlton, partner, Phillips Wyatt Knowlton, Inc. Moderator: Randall Eberts, executive director, W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research Project Streamline: Drowning in Paperwork, Distracted from Purpose- Emerald B Are you frustrated with inefficiencies in grant application and reporting processes? Project Streamline, a collaboration among eight philanthropic and nonprofit organizations, is working to develop standards for the documentation required in these processes. Session participants will provide input from their experiences, and consider recommendations for improving grantmaking practice. Speaker: Teresa Crawford, grants manager, Frey Foundation Moderator: Andrea Cole, executive director & CEO, Ethel and James Flinn Foundation 11:00 a.m. to 12:15 p.m.- Community - Foundation Concurrent Sessions · · · · <:: mic higa nfoundations.org 15 Great Marketing Ideas- Haldane This fast paced session promises that you'll leave with at least five great marketing ideas you can implement immediately! Each speaker will take 2 minutes (yes there will be a gong!) to outline a successful marketing effort they implemented in their community and "how to" handouts will detail all15 ideas. Moderator: Ann Tabor, president, Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Building Unrestricted Endowment Assets Grandview In 2004 the Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation undertook a five-year asset development initiative to raise $15 million in gifts and pledges for unrestricted endowment funds to support its broad community grantmaking program and another $10 million in new documented bequests to ensure future funding. As they prepare to celebrate the success of the Fund the Future campaign, hear what they learned about the myths and realities of targeted asset development and donor interest and responsiveness. Speakers: James Buhr, Fund the Future chair and former trustee, Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation; Cheryl Elliott, president and CEO, Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation; Judith Peters, development director, Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation Moderator: Chris Smith, program officer, Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan Matching Donors with Community Needs Berkey How do you best match current donors with community needs to maximize your foundation's grantmaking impact? Learn techniques to make this process easier and obtain communications tips and tools for program and development staff to use when talking to donors about opportunities. Speakers: Phil D'Anieri, program director, Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation; Richard Lord, treasurer, RNR Foundation; Jennifer Poteat, fund advisor, Jennifer R. Poteat Fund, Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation Moderator: Robert Jordan, philanthropic services officer, Fremont Area Community Foundation �12:30 to 2:00 p.m.- Luncheon Keynote: Our Blueprint for Michigan's Prosperity- Ambassador Ballroom 2:30 to 4:00 p.m. - Closing Keynote: Transformation Requires Creativity and Activism - Pantlind Ballroom America has become a connected nation of 363 metropolitan areas - defining a blueprint for America's prosperity. More than two-thirds of Michigan's 10 million residents live in five metro area counties. Join a conversation about the role philanthropy can play in the four vital ingredients necessary for prosperous metro areas and Michigan's transformation: innovation, human capital, infrastructure and quality places. Speakers: Angela Glover Blackwell, founder & CEO, Policylink; Bruce Katz, vice president, Metropolitan Policy Program, Brookings Moderator: Rip Rapson, president, The Kresge Foundation Underwritten by The Kresge Foundation and C.S. Matt Foundation The media reminds us that this is a time of great adversity for Michiganders. How can one individual or one foundation make a difference and be involved in Michigan's transformation? Join legendary activists and philanthropists in an inspirational conversation about creativity and activism and how both are vital to overcoming adversity and capitalizing on opportunities for transformation. Speakers: Judy Collins, singer, songwriter & philanthropist; Ruby Dee, actress & philanthropist Moderator:Thomas Beech, president & CEO, The Fetzer Institute Underwritten by The Fetzer Institute and the Dorothy A. Johnson Educational Fund 2:00 to 2:30 p.m. - Break Head to Resource Central to visit with exhibitors and partners, buy a few books at our Conference Bookshop or participate in an AmeriCorps service project Or, check your e-mail in the Cyber Cafe in the Ruby room. "WE CANNOT LIVE ONLY FOR OURSELVES. A THOUSAND FIBERS CONNECT US WITH OUR FELLOW MENj AND AMONG THOS.: 1 SY~ :fT~SET~g A<!!know le-J5e-me-nh ~IIDI,READS, OUR CMF extends its sincere thanks to all those who contributed to creating the 36th annual conference: the 33 members of the Conference Committee; our co-chairs Caroline Chambers, Rachel Mraz and Milt Rohwer; our generous sponsors and foundation supporters; and to each member of the CMF staff. ACTIONS RUN AS CAUSES, AND THEY COME BACK TO US AS EFFECTS. Herman Melville A special thank you also goes to the W.K. Kellogg Foundation for supporting the Take a Promising Future Leader to the CMF Annual Conference pilot program. steelcasefoundation.org 19 michiganfoundations.org �Caroline Chambers, co-chair, Comerica Charitable Foundation GRAND HAVEN OFRCE Rachel Mraz, co-chair, Eileen & Brian DeVries Family Foundation Robert S. Collier, president & CED Milt Rohwer, co-chair, Frey Foundation David R.lindberg, vice president finance & administration Tamara Bailey, Northern Trust Bank, FSB Vicki J. Rosenberg, vice president education, communications & external relations Arn Boezaart, Community Foundation for Muskegon County Andrea Cole, Ethel and James Flinn Foundation lisa Cripps, Frederick S. Upton Foundation lisa Cylar Miller, The Skillman Foundation Phil D'Anieri, Ann Arbor Area Community Foundation lois DeBacker, The Kresge Foundation Elizabeth Dole, Dole Family Foundation Heather Dombrowski, The Skillman Foundation Randall Eberts, WE. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research DeDe Esque, Nokomis Foundation lynne Ferrell, Frey Foundation Neal Hegarty, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation Wendy lewis Jackson, The Kresge Foundation Jennifer Bodrie, administrative assistant Susan J. Cuddington, executive assistant to the president Barbara A. Dryer, information services specialist & grants manager Jeri L Fischer, director, membership & special projects Kathleen N. Ginocchio, director, technology Michael Goorhouse, program associate, youth philanthropy Dana Unnane, public policy fellow laura l. Terhaar, accounts payable administrator Donnell S. Mersereau, director, community foundations Rebecca l. Noricks, communications manager Tammie S. TenBroeke, payroll-benefits administrator Mary Trimbach, data applications specialist Robert Jordan, Fremont Area Community Foundation Roberta King, Grand Rapids Community Foundation Salvatore Maiorana, JPMorgan Chase Foundation JeneferO'Dell, WK. Kellogg Foundation Shannon Polk, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation SOUTHEAST MICHIGAN OFFICE Terreance Coleman, program associate, community foundations Susan B. Howbert, director, family philanthropy Beverly Spriggs, program associate Dianne Price, WK. Kellogg Foundation Ellen Satterlee, Wege Foundation John Schneider, Clark Hill PLC CONSULTANT: Michael B. Gallagher, editorial consultant David Sebastian, The Sebastian Foundation Chris Smith, Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan CONFERENCE MATERIALS DESIGNED BY: Robin Smith Design Ann Irish Tabor, Grand Haven Area Community Foundation Jenee Velasquez, Herbert H. and Grace A. Dow Foundation GRAPHIC CREDITS: Ronna Alexander Randy Walainis, Metro Health Foundation lee Nelson Weber, Dyer-lves Foundation Diane Wynsma Hyland, U.S. Trust, Bank of America Jonse Young, Grand Rapids Community Foundation Innovation in support of philanthropy. www.legacygr.com 616.454.2852 mic higa nfoundations.org �OHi~fbrs { J)oar.d of Trus~fbfbS Diana R. Sieger, chairperson Grand Rapids Community Foundation Elizabeth A. Cherin, vice chair- Community Foundations Fremont Area Community Foundation Melanie B. Colaianne, MASCO Corporation Foundation vice chair- Corporate Foundations Betsy Upton Stover, vice chair- Private Foundations FrederickS. Upton Foundation Amanda VanDusen, secretary Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C. Phillip H. Peters, treasurer Charles Stewart Mott Foundation RobertS. Collier, president Council of Michigan Foundations Susan K. Broman, Steel case Foundation Caroline E. Chambers, Comerica Charitable Foundation John Colina, Colina Foundation Thomas B. Cook, Cook Family Foundation For sponsorship or exhibitor opportunities or to serve on the 37th Annual Conference Planning Committee, call616.842.7080 or e-mail conference@michiganfoundations.org. David 0. Egner, Hudson-Webber Foundation Rev. J. louis Felton, Kalamazoo Community Foundation Russelll. Gabier, Irving S. Gilmore Foundation Allan D. Gilmour, Community Foundation for Southeast Michigan Carol A. Goss, The Skillman Foundation Wesley H. Maurer, Jr., Mackinac Island Community Foundation 2009 VISIT TO WASHINGTON, D.C. Foundations on the Hill March 24 & 25,2009 Rated one of the best experiences CMF offers! Russell G. Mawby, CMF Advisory Cabinet Rachel Mraz, Eileen and Brian DeVries Family Foundation David K. Page, The Jewish Fund Carol Paine-McGovern, Paine Family Foundation Thomas S. Porter, Porter Family Foundation • Registration will begin in January. • A block of rooms has been reserved at the Helix Hotel (1430 Rhode Island Ave) • Contact Rob Collier or Sue Cuddington at 616.842.7080 with questions DavidS. Sebastian, The Sebastian Foundation Sterling K. Speirn, WK. Kellogg Foundation Margaret E. Thompson, Harry A. and Margaret D. Towsley Foundation Christian A. Velasquez, Midland Area Community Foundation Daniel J. Wyant, Edward Lowe Foundation mich iganfoundations.org �TakefAdYrottcge: ifT!teJe:Jvtember 13e:;ujitJl - ADVOCACY Rely on us ro: Work on your behalf with legislators in Lansing and Washingron, D.C. on rhe laws and regulations affecting your giving. • Inform and respond ro the media about the issues affecting Michigan foundations. SUPPORTING COLLABORATIVE RESPONSES TO CRITICAL STATE NEEDS Connect with colleagues and state leaders on issues like aging, rhe arcs, early childhood, rhe economy, K-16 education, land use, women & girls and workforce development. SAVINGS & DISCOUNTS EDUCATION & NETWORKING Develop your skills and network with other grantmakers in your local community, region or across the state - either in-person or through our convenient teleconferences and Webinars, including: • Statewide Annual Conference Family Foundations Retreat • Community Foundation CEO and Program Officer Retreats • Teleconferences and Webinars on investments, communications and more! NEWS & INFORMATION Get the latest Michigan philanthropy news and resources for your work through: • michiganfoundations.org Weekly News\¥1ire • Monthly E-News • Mmw to Memben newsletter three-times a year with Family Philamhropist insert for family foundations Insut'ttnce 10% premium credit on Directors' & Officers ' insurance through a partnership with rhe Council on Foundations Guides & Subscriptions • 20% off GranrCraft guides and resources • $15 off Stanjot·d Social Innovation Review yearly subscription Software • 10% off MicroEdge products • 4-12% offBromelkamp products Memberships • $50 off Communications Network membership Services & Technical Assistance • Complimentary job postings on michiganfoundarions.org 6.5 cents a minute conference calling without a reservation DISCOUNTS THROUGH PARTNERSHIP WITH THE SMALL BUSINESS ASSOCIATION OF MICHIGAN (SBAM) Insut'ttnce (life, health, dental, vision, COBRA administration, health reimbursement arrangements, health savings accounts, section 125 plans, flexible spending and dependent care reimbursement plans) • Human Resources (free hotline, employee handbooks, job assessment tools, background checks) • Legal (free fact-based answers from Clark Hill PLC) Opet'tttions (payroll services, merchant services, overnight shipping, identiry theft prorecrion) • Technology (web sire and e-mail hosting) RESOURCES & RESEARCH • Customized research from our librarian • Access ro legal and accounting expertise • Sample documents such as bylaws through our online knowledgebase • Sample policies like conflict of interest • lending library of rhe most current books and journals on giving and nonprofits CMF Council of Michigan Foundations Serving grantmakers. Advancing giving. Mission: To strengthen, promote and increase philanthropy in Michigan. ONE SOUTH HARBOR AVE., SUITE 3, GRAND HAVEN, Ml 49417 P 616.842.7080 100 TALON CENTRE DRIVE, SUITE 150, DETROIT, Ml 48207 P 313.566.2444 michiganfoundations.org F 616.842.1760 F 313.566.2445 �Ho{el Map E le •ators A Kendall Grand View D =Accessable only from Rocro Exhibitors Building Elevu1ors or s tairs . These areas are not level with the 2nd and 3rd floors ofthe rest of the Hotel. Third Floor Exhibitors Building Enclos.ed Walkway to Convention Center Tala -tl n.:tot:S b }' L~or.. SttHt Er..>:t:mce . , U>O ;·--F~~~~~~· I•..__. . .r------...,.-'T"'"--Lv,_0-:-es"'!:n-:-:-:e---, fT ~ rt" lhe A. "!. : .S.h,,op,.s. "·-·· m i" L ?l~~~e - Shops Vandenberg Room B L:_ _j~ ~· Pearl Room Ambdssador Ballroom West Center Concourse East -·· T\·· -·;r· .. -.....;.__ Imperial Ballroom Pearl S~reer Second Floor Concourse Level Elevators Enclosed Walkwo Pearl Street Po k. y to Lyon Street Entrance lyon ! ~......,.-... ] GPSpom River LHoPsj THE Atrium Stair ··-.. ~ ' Tower l ,___" PLAZA • r tng Romp Loading Dock Entrance __,_ Soulh Concourse ~ Crown Foyer Elevators _ ,_ Soles and Calering Office l Slreet "'"c<D ~ The 19 13 Room Eleva~ors [')__:__ e j~ - The G rd l Monroe Avenue Lobby Entra nc e !"resident Gerald R. Ford Ballroom First Floor Lobby Level 2'"5 Imperial Ballroom Elevators mich iganfoundations.org � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Conference-Committee-Report Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book conference committee report Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book conference committee report. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50740 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/d62e2c57aa9902a15fd28870be9d342b.pdf 893ed12eb143febfc976f7b3ad3335fb PDF Text Text CMF Council of Michigan Fou ncfations Return via fax: 616.842.1760 by October 10, 2008 SeNing grantmakers. Advancing giving. Annual Meeting of Members Notice and Board of Trustees Ballot August 28, 2008 In accordance with the bylaws of t he Council of Michigan Foundations (CMF), notice is hereby given that the Annual Meeting of Members will be held on Monday, October 13, 2008 at 8:00a.m. at the Amway Grand Plaza Hotel in Grand Rapids for the purposes of electing Trust ees, reporting to the members on the business of CMF, and such other business as may properly be brought before the meeting. CMF is governed by a Boa rd of individuals who represent private, family, community, public and corporate f oundations, in addition to corporate giving programs. The foll ow ing nine individuals have been nominated by the Governance Committee for election to t he Boa rd of Trustees for a three-yea r term beginning Octo ber 13,2008. The undersigned hereby appoints Amanda Van Dusen, Secretary of CMF, and Senior Principal at Miller, Canfield, Paddock, and Stone, PLC, as proxy of the undersigned, w it h power t o appoint a substit ute, and authorizes her to vote at the meeting on behalf of the undersigned as indicat ed below. The proxy will use her discret ion as to any matters that may come before the meeting. Please vote and return your marked ballot on or before Friday, October 10, 2008 either by fax to 616.842.1760, by mail to 1 S. Harbor, Suite 3, Grand Haven, Ml 49417, or download the ballot at http://www.michiqanfoundations.org/ballot. complete and email it to scuddinqton@michiqanfoundations.org. t:J Elect all the following nominees or Cl Elect only those nominees indicated below For Re-election to the Board Class of 2011 __ Melanie B. Colaianne, President, MASCO Corporation Foundation, Taylor __ David 0. Egner, President and CEO, Hudson-Webber Foundation, Detroit __ Russell L. Gabier, Secret ary/Trustee, Irving S. Gilmore Foundation, Kalamazoo __ Phillip H. Peters, V.P. Administration, Charles Stewart Mott Foundation, Flint __ Margaret E. Thompson, Trustee, Harry A. and Margaret D. Towsley Foundation, M idland __ Christian A. Velasquez, Trustee, Midland Area Community Foundation, M idland New Nominees to the Board Class of 2011 (bios provided on the reverse side of this ballot) __ Hugo E. (Ted) Bra un, Jr., President, Harvey Randall Wickes Foundation, Saginaw __ Andrea M . Cole, Executive Director & CEO, Ethel and James Flinn Foundatio n, Detroit __ Brenda L. Hunt, President and CEO, Battle Creek Community Foundation, Battle Creek CMF Member Organization Name Tit l e Main Office: One South Harbor Avenue, Suite 3, Grand Haven, M l 49417 p 616.842.7080 f 616.842.1760 info@michiganfoundations.org Southeast Michigan Office: 100 Talon Cent re Dr., Suite 150, Detroit, Ml 48207 p 313.566.2444 f 313.566.2445 www.michiganfoundations.org �New Nominees for the Board of Trustees Hugo E. (Ted) Braun, Jr., President- Harvey Randall Wickes Foundation Ted's commitment to community is evidenced in the hundreds of hours per year of pro bono legal work he does for small nonprofit agencies through the law firm of Braun, Kendrick & Finkbeiner. Wearing his President's hat for the Harvey Randall Wickes Foundat ion, Ted is always open to listening t o new ideas, giving guidance on funding options and championing operational funding for strong local agencies. He has provided leadership over the years, sharing his time, treasure and talent with the Boys and Girls Club, United Way, Saginaw Community Foundation, Child and Family Services, Saginaw Valley State University, Saginaw General Hospital and many more organizations. Ted's legal expertise, business acumen and philanthropic endeavors enrich the Saginaw area and the state of Michigan. Andrea M. Cole, Executive Director and CEO- Ethel and James Flinn Foundation Andrea Cole is the new Executive Director and CEO of the Detroit based Ethel & James Flinn Foundation. The Foundation is committed t o improving the quality of life of those with mental illness by improving the quality, scope and delivery of mental health services in Southeast Michigan. Andrea was previously the CFO of The Skillman Foundation where she was responsible for all financial and administrative operations. She currently serves as CMF's Governance Committee Co-Chair and has been a member of CMF for 20 years. Andrea received both her Master's degree and Bachelor of Science degree in finance from Wayne State University. She is actively involved in her community and serves on several boards. She is also a member of Grantmakers in Hea lth, Council on Foundations, National Black MBA Association, Institute of Management Accountants, Foundation Financial Officers Group, Association of Black Foundat ion Executives and Women in Philanthropy. Brenda L. Hunt, President and CEO- Battle Creek Community Foundation Brenda is known throughout the state for her collaborative approach to addressing community and regional needs, including her work with fourteen community foundations in southwest Michigan and helping five community foundations work together in Calhoun County. She has also taken a proactive role in helping to align and catalyze the nonprofit health sector within Calhoun County . Recently, Brenda has been instrumenta l in leading an effort to develop a Michigan College Access Network. She has provided leadership and guidance in fostering public-privat e partnerships and has been instrumental in bringing about the refocusing of area initiatives to be more collaborative and inclusive. Currently Brenda serves on the Council of Michigan Foundation's Finance Committee and as the Chair of the Community Foundation Committee. Current Board of Trustees by Class Class of 2009 RobertS. Collier, President Council of Michigan Foundations Grand Haven Rev. J. Louis Felton, Trustee Allan D. Gilmour, Trustee Kalamazoo Community Foundation Community Foundation fo r Southeast Michigan Kalamazoo Detroit Carol A. Goss, President & CEO Rachel Mraz, Trustee The Skillman Foundation Eileen and Brian DeVries Family Foundation Detroit Grand Rapids David K. Page, Trustee DavidS. Sebastian, Trustee Sterling K. Speirn, President & CEO The Jewish Fund The Sebastian Foundation W.K. Kellogg Foundation Detroit Grand Rapids Battle Creek Amanda Van Dusen, Senior Principal M iller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, PLC Detroit Susan K. Broman, Executive Director Steelcase Foundation Grand Rapids Caroline E. Chambers, President Elizabeth A. Cherin, President & CEO Comerica Charitable Foundation Fremont Area Community Foundation Detroit Fremont John Colina, President Thomas B. Cook, Executive Director Colina Foundation Cook Family Foundation Southgate Owosso Wesley H. Maurer Jr., Chairman Carol Paine-McGovern, President Thomas S. Porter, President Mackinac Island Community Foundation Paine Family Foundation Porter Family Foundation Mackinac Island Manistee Ann Arbor Betsy Upton Stover, Trustee Daniel J. Wyant, President FrederickS. Upton Foundation Edward Lowe Foundation Benton Harbor Cassopolis Class of 2010 In addition, we are privileged to have Dr. Russell G. Mawby, Chair Emeritus of the W.K. Kellogg Foundation and Co-Chair of the CMF Advisory Cabinet, as an ex-officio member of the Board Trustees. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Board-Ballot Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book board ballot Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book board ballot. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50739 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/76459e2742882df0ec6aafedade9cedb.pdf 156b4b4fe2a9f4ab2a2cd650a987850e PDF Text Text October 3, 2008 To: CMF Board of Trustees From: Diana R. Sieger, Chairperson Robert S. Collier, President cc: Dav id Lindberg Vice President, Finance & Administration New Board of Trustee Nominees Re: Monday, October 13, 2008 Board of Trustees Meeting Amway Grand Hotel Pearl Room @ 2:30 p.m. We are pleased to enclose the Agendas and materials for both the Board of Trustees Meeting and Annual Meeting of the Supporting Organizations that will take place on Monday, October 13 following the conclusion of the luncheon plenary with Scott Page, Ralph Smith & fellow trustee Sterling Speim. We hope you can join us during the following special activ ities: Sunday, October 12 2:30-3:30 p.m. Monday, October 13 7:45 a.m.- 8:45 a.m. Tuesday, October 14 Time & location to be announced at Board Meeting Special reception with plenary speaker, Dan Rather Location: Gerald R. Ford Museum (walking map enclosed) Annual Members Meeting Location: Ambassador Ballroom (Please stand when we introduce you) Special Reception with plenary speakers Judy Collins & Ruby Dee Please let Rob or Sue Cuddington know if you have any questions about the Conference. We thank you for your continued support! � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_Board-Agenda Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book board agenda Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book board agenda. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50738 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13 https://digitalcollections.library.gvsu.edu/files/original/a1e0500f0d0dd226476b6c14fc8f821e.pdf b921c3a47c426d6293c9fc6e274f80b9 PDF Text Text 21st Century Schools Fund Summary: Small High School Infrastructure Program (Sec. 11n ofSB11 07) SB 1107 appropriates $15.0 million for start up and implementation grants ofup to $3.0 million over 4 years for each newly-configured school with at least an average 75 pupils per grade and not more than 110 pupils per grade. The intent of the program is to replace large impersonal high schools that have failed to achieve graduation and academic achievement goals with small, personalized high schools based on rigor, relevance and relationships. Districts with a graduation rate less than 70% (or PSAs with a majority of students residing in such a district) would be el igible. New schools created through the Fund must have the goal of graduating at least 80% of their students. 80% of graduating students must enroll in a postsecondary institution. If a school fails to achieve these goals, districts will be required to refund Y2 the grant funding. The grant applicant should commit to incorporating a relationship-building goal between the teaching staff, administration, pupils, and parents. Schools will be site-based managed. Building principals will control staffing decisions and must involve the teaching staff in key decisions about teaching and learning. The grant applicant must have a commitment of private matching funds at least equal to the amount of the grant. �21st Century Schools Fund Overview 1. $15 million in state funding authorized in FY09 School Aid Act. 2. The Administration will seek equal or greater appropriations in future budgets. 3. All grants from the 21st Century School Fund require a dollar for dollar cash match. 4. The intent is to fund this initiative with a combined $180 million in public and private funds over a six year period. 5. Eligible school districts are those with graduation rates below 70% based on new cohort data. 6. Grants will be used to create small learning environments serving not more than 110 students per grade level. 7. Preference will be given to proposals for schools that serve grades 6-12 or that have middle school strategies. 8. Grants can be used for planning, operations and capital needs and can be up to $3 million per school over a four year period. 9. Districts must use evidenced based designs with the goal of achieving an 80o/o graduation rate and 80% post secondary attendance rate by the school's third graduating calls. 10.The Michigan Department of Education will ask the State Board of Education to add grant criteria including site-based management, bargaining unit involvement in planning and the use of intermediaries/school developers by grantees. 11.The MDE will create a collaborative grant-making process that will examine proposals in the context of applicant districts' overall high school reform plans and which involves the foundation community and other community partners. � Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Title A name given to the resource Our State of Generosity Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Grand Valley State University. Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Description An account of the resource Collection contains the records of four Michigan nonprofit organizations: Council of Michigan Foundations, Michigan Nonprofit Association, Michigan Community Service Commission, and the Johnson Center for Philanthropy at GVSU. The documents are compiled by the Johnson Center for Philanthropy, and records document the history of the organizations from the 1960s to the 2010s. Coverage The spatial or temporal topic of the resource, the spatial applicability of the resource, or the jurisdiction under which the resource is relevant 1968-2014 Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Nonprofit Association Michigan Community Service Commission Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Michigan Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 49401 Contributor An entity responsible for making contributions to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations; Michigan Nonprofit Association; Michigan Community Service Commission Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04 Language A language of the resource eng Text A resource consisting primarily of words for reading. Examples include books, letters, dissertations, poems, newspapers, articles, archives of mailing lists. Note that facsimiles or images of texts are still of the genre Text. Dublin Core The Dublin Core metadata element set is common to all Omeka records, including items, files, and collections. For more information see, http://dublincore.org/documents/dces/. Identifier An unambiguous reference to the resource within a given context JCPA-04_CMF_2008_BB_2008-10-13_21st-Century-Schools-Fund Title A name given to the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book 21st Century Schools fund Creator An entity primarily responsible for making the resource Council of Michigan Foundations. Board of Trustees Description An account of the resource Council of Michigan Foundations 2008-10-13 board book 21st Century Schools fund. Records are compiled in the Our State of Generosity collection by the Johnson Center, along with the files of the Michigan Nonprofit Association (MNA), the Michigan Community Service Commission (MCSC) and the Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy. Originals are at the Council of Michigan Foundations. Subject The topic of the resource Dorothy A. Johnson Center for Philanthropy Charities Philanthropy and Society Fundraising Records Council of Michigan Foundations Michigan Format The file format, physical medium, or dimensions of the resource application/pdf Type The nature or genre of the resource Text Language A language of the resource eng Publisher An entity responsible for making the resource available Grand Valley State University Libraries, Special Collections and University Archives, 1 Campus Drive, Allendale, MI, 50737 Rights Information about rights held in and over the resource <a href="http://rightsstatements.org/page/InC/1.0/?language=en">In Copyright</a> Source A related resource from which the described resource is derived <a href="https://gvsu.lyrasistechnology.org/repositories/2/resources/515">Our State of Generosity collection, JCPA-04</a> Date A point or period of time associated with an event in the lifecycle of the resource 2008-10-13